Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-46-92 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE DN: KINGSBERRY.GPA REPORT M General Purpose and Administration Committee o eetina: File# Li_a�- y Date: Monday, March 2, 1992 Res. 17 ADDENDUM TO By-Law# s?' Report#: File #: DEV-go-0-7-6 (X-REF: 18T-90035 & NPA 90-08/CS) Subject: REZONING APPLICATION & PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION KINGSBERRY PROPERTIES PART LOT 31, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON FILE: DEV 90-076 (X-REF: IST-90035 & NPA 90-08/CS) Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT the Addendum to Report PD-46-92 be received; 2 . THAT Report PD-46-92 be lifted from the table; 3 . THAT the recommendations contained therein be APPROVED. 1. BACKGROUND 1. 1 Report PD-46-92 was TABLED by the General Purpose and Administration Committee on February 17 , 1992 in order to allow Staff to address various concerns expressed in a letter submitted by Joseph McKenna. The concerns expressed by Mr. McKenna related to the following: a) tree preservation b) dust control measures c) removal of non-hazardous solid construction debris 1.2 With respect to the issue of Tree Preservation, Staff note that the applicant has submitted a Tree Preservation Plan to the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority and that the Plan has been found to be acceptable. In addition, although municipal staff has not reviewed this plan as yet, Condition No. 7 of the Conditions of Draft Approval contained in report PD-46-92 require the applicant to prepare and submit a Tree Preservation Plan to the Director of Planning and Development. 2 W6 V3 11f P ADDENDUM REPORT NO. PD-46-92 PAGE 2 1. 3 With respect to the issue of the removal of non-hazardous solid construction debris and dust control measures, Staff would confirm that the Town's subdivision agreement contains provisions which confirm the Owner/builder's responsibility for the removal of construction garbage and debris from the lands in an orderly and sanitary fashion. Additionally the agreement addresses the Owner/builder/s responsibility of maintaining all internal roads in a condition acceptable to the Director of Public Works, ensuring the roads are free of dust and mud. Staff advise that Condition No. 8 of the Conditions of Draft Approval contained in Report PD- 46-92 requires -the applicant to enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Town and to agree to abide by all terms and conditions of the agreement. 2 . CONCLUSION 2 . 1 In view of the comments contained within this Addendum Report, Staff recommends that Report PD-46-92 be lifted from the table and that the recommendations therein be APPROVED. Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee 2� Fran in Wu, M.C.I.P. tawrenco Kotseff Director of Planning Chief d 'nistrative and Development Officet WM*FW*cc *Attach 21 February 1992 Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: Mark Foley Joseph L. McKenna Kingsberry Properties 13 Poulton Crescent 319 College Avenue Courtice, Ontario P.O. Box 11 LlE 2H4 Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7K8 l ^p � � QJ THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE DN: KINGSBERRY.GPA REPORT Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File# Date: Monday, February 17 , 1992 Res. # PD-46-92 DEV 90-076 (X-REF: 18T-90035 & NPABDIbaw0-9/.C.S�. Report#: — File #: &jbject: REZONING APPLICATION PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION KINGSBERRY PROPERTIES PART LOT 31, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON FILE: DEV 90-076 (X-REF: 18T-90035 & NPA 90-08/CS) Recommendations: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PD-46-92 be received; 2 . THAT the Region of Durham be advised that the Town of Newcastle recommends approval of the draft plan of subdivision 18T-90035 dated November 26, 1990 as revised in red, subject to the conditions contained in Attachment No. I to this report; 3 . THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized, by By-law, to execute the Subdivision Agreement between the owner of the proposed draft plan of subdivision 18T-90035 and the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle at such time as an Agreement has been finalized to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and Development; 4. THAT the attached amendment to By-law 84-63 be APPROVED and that the Holding (H) symbol be removed by By-law upon execution of the Subdivision Agreement; 5. THAT the proposed Neighbourhood Plan Amendment application be DENIED; and 6. THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. 1. APPLICATION DETAILS 1. 1 Applicant: Kingsberry Properties 1. 2 Subdivision: Seeking approval for twenty-two (22) two family dwelling units and forty (40) townhouse units for a total of sixty two (62) dwelling units. REPORT NO. PD-46-92 PAGE 2 1. 3 Rezoning: From in part "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ( (H)R1) " and in part "Environmental Protection (EP) " to an appropriate zone or zones in order to implement the above noted development. 1.3 Neighbourhood Plan Amendment: Seeking approval for the redesignation of a portion of the subject lands from "Minor Open Space" to "Residential" in order to implement a portion of the above noted development. 2 . BACKGROUND 2 . 1 In September of 1990, the Town of Newcastle Planning and Development Department was advised by the Region of Durham of an application for approval of a Plan of Subdivision submitted by Kingsberry Properties. In September of 1990, the applicant also filed an application with the municipality to amend the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law in order to implement the proposed plan of subdivision. 2 .2 The subject property is a 2 .753 hectare (6.8 acre) parcel located on the west side of Trull's Road, south of Highway No. 2 but is more formally described as Part Lot 31, Concession 2, in the former Township of Darlington. 3 . PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS 3 . 1 Pursuant to Council's resolution of July 26, 1982 and the requirements of the Planning Act, the appropriate signage acknowledging the application was installed on the subject lands. In addition the appropriate notice was mailed to each landowner within the prescribed distance. . . . 3 120 REPORT NO. PD-46-92 PAGE 3 3 . 2 As of the writing of this report, Staff have received two (2) written submissions which expressed concerns regarding tree preservation, rear yard setbacks and fencing. The Planning and Development Department advised the area residents that the applicant would be required to submit a tree preservation plan and that the zone categories requested by the applicant would require a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metre (24. 6 feet) . However, the Planning Department also advised the area residents that the municipality does not require developers to provide fencing when the proposed use abuts a similar use (i.e. residential abutting residential) . In this case, the applicant is proposing to develop street townhouses abutting street townhouses and link dwellings abutting link dwellings. Therefore, the provision of fencing is not required ' by the municipality. 4 . OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY 4. 1 Within the existing Durham Regional Official Plan, the subject property is designated Residential while the recommended Durham Regional Official Plan designates the subject property as a Living Area. The application would appear to conform to both the existing and the recommended Durham Regional Official Plan. 4 . 2 Within the Courtice Major Urban Area, the Town of Newcastle Official Plan establishes a maximum of 15 units per net residential hectare for Low Density Residential development, a maximum of 40 units per net residential hectare for Medium Density Residential development and a maximum of 80 units per net residential hectare for High Density Residential Development. The applicant is proposing to develop the 2. 753 hectare (6. 8 acre) parcel at an overall density of 42 .75 units per net residential hectare which falls within the high . . . 4 X206 REPORT NO. PD-46-92 PAGE 4 density range as defined by the Town of Newcastle Official Plan. The Neighbourhood Development Plan for Courtice South does not identify specific areas for medium and high density development in order to permit greater flexibility in subdivision design. High density residential development is intended to be located adjacent to medium density residential development and in close proximity to the Community Central Area. 4.3 The Planning and Development Department has also evaluated the proposed 62 unit plan of subdivision in relation to the target population of the 112B" Neighbourhood. Staff have determined that the density proposed by the applicant would serve to exceed the target population. 5. ZONING BY-LAW COMPLIANCE 5. 1 Within the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84- 63 , the subject property is zoned in part "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ( (H)R1) " and in part "Environmental Protection (EP) " . The current zone categories would permit the development of a portion of the subject lands with single and two family dwellings. As the applicant proposes to develop street townhouses and to develop a portion of the subject property zoned "Environmental Protection (EP) " , the applicant has applied to amend the zoning by-law accordingly. 6. AGENCY COMMENTS 6. 1 The application for a proposed 62 unit plan of subdivision was circulated to various agencies by the Durham Regional Planning Department. Concurrently, the Town of Newcastle Planning and Development Department undertook a circulation of the proposed zoning by-law amendment. The following provides a brief synopsis of the comments received. . . . 5 1 2 o. REPORT NO. PD-46 -92 PAGE 5 6.2 The Ministry of Natural Resources has advised that the subject property is located within the Black Creek and Robinson Creek watersheds. In order to prevent fish habitat destruction, the Ministry has requested that the Owner prepare a preliminary stormwater drainage and erosion control report to address concerns regarding, pre, during, and post construction water quality. The Owner has complied and the report has been found to be satisfactory. Therefore, the Ministry offers no objection to the proposal. 6. 3 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority has advised that the subject site is traversed by a headwater tributary to Robinson Creek and that the Owner has proposed to channelize the watercourse and fill the surrounding lands in order to contain the floodprone area within the open space block. The Authority has reviewed the associated tree preservation report and engineering report and have found them to be acceptable. Therefore, the Authority offers no objection to the proposal. 6. 4 The Town of Newcastle Public Works Department has advised that they have no objection to the proposal subject to the Town's standard conditions. In addition, the Public Works Department has noted that the applicant owns additional lands at the intersection of Strathallan Drive and Trulls Road. The Public Works Department has advised that once these additional lands develop the Town will require a 5. 1 metre road widening along Trulls Road and that the subdivision agreement between the Town and the Owner will include a "Staging Plan" including the sequential development of these additional lands. 6.5 The Community Services Department has advised that they have no objection to the proposal subject to the following . . . 6 REPORT NO. PD-46-92 PAGE 6 conditions. Firstly, that Block 20 and Block 21 be accepted gratuitously and secondly that the applicant be required to provide 5% cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication with the funds realized credited to the Parks Reserve Account. 6. 6 The Ministry of Transportation has advised that they have no objection to the proposed plan of subdivision, however, the Ministry will require that all new buildings be set back a minimum distance of 32 metres (105 feet) from the centerline of Highway # 2 . Staff note for the Committee's information that the application proposes a minimum set back of 32 . 906 metres (108 feet) . 6. 7 The balance of the circulated agencies which provided comments were Town of Newcastle Fire Department, Regional Planning Department, Regional Works Department, Public School Board, Separate School Board, Ontario Hydro, Bell Canada and Ministry of the Environment. None of the aforementioned agencies provided objectionable comments with respect to the proposal. 7. STAFF COMMENTS 7. 1 Staff have reviewed the application in relation to the proposed density, the density of the surrounding area, the residential density policies contained within the Official Plan, the target population of the Official Plan and the surrounding land uses. 7.2 The applicant is proposing to develop a sixty-two (62) unit plan of subdivision at an overall density of 42 . 75 units per net residential hectare. This density is substantially higher than the density of the westerly abutting registered plan of subdivision 10M 839 which developed at an overall density of 30. 1 units per net residential hectare. The proposed higher . . . 7 _ - Y 0� Ju . L REPORT NO. PD-46-92 PAGE 7 density would actually satisfy certain policies of the Town of Newcastle Official Plan which require a transition of densities from the Community Central Area. (See Attachment #1) However, as stated earlier in this report, the proposed density would serve to exceed the target population. 7 .3 Therefore, in an effort to maintain a density which is compatible with the westerly abutting registered plan of subdivision and maintain the target population for the 2B Neighbourhood, the Planning Department has red-lined the proposed plan to a total of 55 units. Firstly, the applicant proposes to develop Block 13 with 8 townhouse units. Staff have red-lined Block 13 to provide 4 single family dwellings with frontages of 12 . 75 metres. This would serve to both reduce the number of units and provide a wider housing mix since the applicant's submission did not provide any single family dwellings. 7 .4 Secondly, Staff have expanded and red-lined the Open Space Block to incorporate Block 12 which the applicant proposed to develop with three (3) townhouse units. Block 12 is currently zoned "Environmental Protection (EP) "and designated as Minor Open Space within the Courtice South Neighbourhood Development Plan. This block is the subject of an application to amend the Neighbourhood Plan to residential. The open space (block 12) is a continuous open space linkage to other open space blocks previously obtained by the Town in the subdivisions to the west and must be maintained to protect the integrity and continuity of the open space linkages. Staff cannot support the neighbourhood plan amendment and hence delete the proposed three (3) townhouse units on Block 12 . . . .8 '; 2 10 REPORT NO. PD-46-92 PAGE 8 7.5 The proposed plan of subdivision, as red-line revised, would now yield an overall density of 37.93 units per net residential hectare. This density, would fall within the medium density range as defined by the Town of Newcastle Official Plan and is more compatible with the westerly abutting Registered Plan 10M-839 . Although the density of the red-line revised plan is approximately 8 units per net residential hectare higher than the abutting plan, the higher density would be permitted by the policies of the Official Plan which would allow for a transition from lower to higher density as development approaches the Community Central Area on the east side of Trulls Road. 7. 6 In addition, the applicant has retained two blocks at the intersection of Strathallan Drive and Trulls Road. These two blocks are located directly across from the Community Central Area and could have the potential for Medium or High Density development in the future. However, the applicant should be aware at this time that these two blocks are currently zoned for single family and/or link dwellings and that the population allocation for the 2B Neighbourhood is at capacity. Therefore, if the applicant decided at a later date to pursue the development potential of these additional lands as a High/Medium Density site, the applicant would be required to file application to amend the Town's Zoning By-law and the Town's Official Plan. 7 . 7 The proposed plan of subdivision as red-line revised is a logical extension of Registered Plans 10M-839 and 10M-820 which are located to the west and the south of the subject property. Additionally, the plan utilizes the service lane concept along Highway # 2 as opposed to reverse lot frontages hence providing pedestrian access to Highway #2 and at the REPORT NO. PD-46-92 PAGE 9 same time enhancing the urban streetscape. In addition, developing the subdivision in this manner provides for a more attractive design and reduces the need for possible noise abatement measures. 7 .8 The Town of Newcastle Public Works Department has advised that a temporary turning circle is required at the south end of Bushford Street. The plan will also be red-lined so that Lots 9 to 11 and Block 16 will be put on hold until development proceeds southerly. 8 . CONCLUSION 8 . 1 In consideration of the comments contained within this report, the Planning and Development Department would have no objection to the approval of the proposed Plan of Subdivision, subject to the conditions of draft approval as contained in Attachment No. 1 annexed hereto. 8 .2 Furthermore, the Planning and Development Department would have no objection to the approval of the attached zoning by- law amendment, to implement the red-lined plan. The amending zoning by-law would provide for the appropriate zone categories to implement the above noted Plan of Subdivision (18T-90035) . Staff note that the removal of the "Holding (H) " prefix will require Council approval, at such time as the Subdivision Agreement is registered. A rezoning application to remove the holding symbol will be required at a later date. 8. 3 Finally, Staff advise that the plan of subdivision, as red- line revised, conforms with the Courtice South Neighbourhood Plan. Therefore, the proposed amendment to the Courtice South Neighbourhood Plan should be denied. . . . 10 REPORT NO. PD-46-92 PAGE 10 Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee (JJ141� kk�� Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P. Lawrence Kotseff Director of Planning Chief Ad istrative and Development Officer WM*FW*cc *Attach 6 February 1992 Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: Mark Foley Kingsberry Properties 319 College Ave. P.O. Box 11 OSHAWA, Ontario L1H 7K8 � 17 DN: KINGSBERRY.GPA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION PLAN IDENTIFICATION 1. That this approval applies to draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-90035 prepared by J. D. Barnes dated November 26, 1990 (and further revised in red as per the attached plan) showing Lots 12 to 15 inclusive for single family detached dwellings, Lots 1 to 11 inclusive for semi-detached or linked dwellings, Blocks 16 to 19 for street townhouses, Block 20 for Open Space, and various blocks for reserve, road widening, site triangle etc. FINAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS 2 . That all streets within the Plan of Subdivision shall be dedicated as public highway and shown as such on the final plan. 3 . That all streets shall be named to the satisfaction of the Town of Newcastle and shown on the final plan. REQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 4 . That the Owner shall retain a qualified landscape architect to prepare and submit a Landscaping Plan to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and Development for review and approval. The Landscaping Plan shall reflect the design criteria of the Town as amended from time to time. 5. That the Owner shall retain a qualified Engineer to prepare and submit a Hydrogeologist Report to the Director of Planning and Development to demonstrate that the proposed development will not adversely impact the existing wells in the surrounding areas. 6. That the Owner shall retain a professional engineer to prepare and submit a Master Drainage and Lot Grading Plan to the Director of Public Works for review and approval. All plans and drawings must conform to the Town's Design Criteria as amended from time to time. T 7 - 1 2 1 �� . . . .2 -2- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D) 7. That the Owner shall retain a qualified consultant to prepare and submit a Tree Preservation plan to the Director of Planning and Development for review and approval. REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 8. That the Owner shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Town and agree to abide by all terms and conditions of the Town's standard subdivision agreement, including, but not limited to the requirements that follow. 9. That all easements, road widenings and reserves as required by the Town shall be granted to the Town free and clear of all encumbrances and in a form satisfactory to the Town's solicitor. 10. That the Owner shall pay to the Town at the time of execution of the subdivision agreement, five percent (5%) cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication. 11. That the Owner shall pay to the Town, the Development Charges required by the Town Development Charge By-law in accordance with the Town payment schedule and shall pay any other charges in effect at the time of execution of this agreement. 12 . That the Owner shall provide and install sidewalks, street lights, temporary turning circles etc. as per the Town's standards and criteria. 13 . That the Owner shall cause all utilities, including, hydro, telephone, Cable TV, etc. to be buried underground for both primary and secondary services. . . .3 -3- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D) 14. That the Owner shall provide the Town, at the time of execution of the subdivision agreement, unconditional Letters of Credit, with respect to Performance Guarantee, Maintenance Guarantee, Occupancy Deposit and other guarantees or deposit as may be required by the Town. 15. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Owner shall retain an architect to prepare and submit an Architectural Control Plan to the Director of Planning and Development. The architect shall further certify that the said Plan has achieved the objectives of providing: a variety of housing style; attractive streetscape treatment; harmony of colour, style and exterior materials used, etc. 16. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Owner shall, through its acoustic engineer, to provide a certification to the Director of Planning, certifying that the Builder's plans are in accordance with the Noise Control Report as approved by the Ministry of the Environment and the Town of Newcastle. 17. That prior to the issuance of building permits, access routes to the subdivision must be provided to meet Subsection 3 .2 .5. 2 (6) of the Ontario Building Code and, that all watermains and hydrants are fully serviced and the Owner agrees that during construction, fire access routes be maintained according to Subsection 2 .5. 1. 2 of the Ontario Fire Code, storage of combustible waste be maintained as per Subsection 2 .4. 1. 1 and open burning as per Subsection 2 . 6. 3 . 4 of the Ontario Fire Code. . . .4 -4- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONTID) 18. The Owner agrees that where the well or private water supply of any person is interfered with as a result of construction or the development of the subdivision, the Owner shall at his expense, either connect the affected party to municipal water supply system or provide a new well or private water system so that water supplied to the affected party shall be of quality and quantity at least equal to the quality and quantity of water enjoyed by the affected party prior to the interference. 19. That Open Space Block 20 and Walkway Block 21 be dedicated to the Town gratuitously. 20. That all works and services be designed and constructed in accordance with the Town of Newcastle Design Criteria and Standard Drawings, all applicable legislation and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 21. That the applicant assume all costs and conform to all applicable standards for the installation and construction of Community Mailboxes servicing this development. 22 . That a temporary turning circle be constructed at the south limit of Bushford Street, directly abutting Lot 9. 23 . That building permits will not be available for Lots 9, 10 and 11 and Block 16 until such time that Bushford Street is extended to the south and a finished urban road, including curb and gutter, sodded boulevard, and sidewalks where applicable, has been constructed abutting these lots and blocks. 24 . That the storm drainage works necessary for this plan of subdivision are constructed in accordance with the "Draft" Robinson Creek Master Drainage Study, dated January 1991, prepared by G. M. Sernas and Associates and as finally approved by the Director of Public Works. _ • . •5 -5- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)- 25. That the storm drainage for this plan of subdivision is in accordance with the Courtice Heights South Master Drainage Plan. 26. That the applicant, pay the Town for the cost of oversizing the storm sewer and the storm management works to service the. drainage of this plan of subdivision. The amount of the payment shall be as defined in the Newcastle Co-Tenancy Cost Apportionment Report, dated October 1991, prepared by G. M. Sernas and Associates Limited and as finally approved by the Director of Public Works. 27. That the construction of Bushford Street, from Lot 10 southerly to the existing portion of Bushford Street, shall be constructed in conjunction with the development on Block 136 of Plan 10M 820 and cost shared by the applicant and the owner of Block 136 on Plan 10M-820. 28. That the development of this plan of subdivision proceeds at such time that the Town Council has approved the expenditure of funds for the provision of the reconstruction of Trulls Road and any external works or services which are included in the Town's Development Charge By-law and which are deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works to service this development. 29. That the applicant enter into a development agreement with the Town including all requirements of the Public Works Department regarding the engineering and construction of all internal and external works and services related to this plan of subdivision. In addition the subdivision agreement will include a "Staging Plan" and all necessary provisions that will control the sequential development of this subdivision in conjunction with the construction of Trulls Road and any external works or services necessary to service this development to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. o 6 � f__ 18 . . . -6- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D) 30. That the applicant meet all the requirements of the Public Works Department, financially or otherwise. 31. That the Owner shall meet all the requirements of Bell Canada, financially or otherwise. 32 . That the Owner shall meet all the requirements of Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, financially or otherwise. 33 . That the Owner shall meet all the requirements of the Ministry of Natural Resources, financially or otherwise. 34 . That the Owner shall meet all the requirements of the Ministry of Environment, financially or otherwise. 35. That the Owner shall meet all the requirements of the Ministry of Transportation, financially or otherwise. 36. That the Owner shall meet all the requirements of Ontario Hydro, financially or otherwise. r � 1219 Attachment Noe 1 HIGHWAY No. 2 U): C6 : w w U U Z O Z I till I till Q Q; v S?IRLING AVENUE w w Y STRATHALLAN DRIVE 0 Cp : t- o o , � : U STEPHEN AVENUE LL . a Z o : O : z D : � : 0 Q 2 J • Q O: o. � N to J i— w o ' HILLHURST P� PP��v CRESCENT COMMUNITY CENTRAL AREA POTENTIAL HIGH/MEDIUM DENSITY SITES MEDIUM DENSITY- 38 UNITS PER NET RESIDENTIAL HECTARE MEDIUM DENSITY- 30 UNITS PER NET RESIDENTIAL HECTARE 2 20 o� y� POOLTON CRESCENT r9r Mc MANN CRESCENT REG/ TEREO 7 � � P 61 1 G3 62 6/ co 9 5B 57 56 5 54 9 SZ 5,50 4 47 w n TO y BLOCK ,4.9 �� '� 84 B,w 77 76 5 lal 2 o g BUSHFORD s STREET 0 g BUSH FORD STREET 7� + 2 MCMANN CRESC PART iy D ,�r t•- w n p . R t a C '^ = ADDITIONAL LANDS x O x ADDITIONAL P L ANDS Y tP...� - O OM 5 PART oN� r3 I �� IEX/ST/N — �EG 57 RED PL N E ; / j� a C= -RES IDENT/ G �- t BLOCK m BY T 1 !-'� N m si'd N ies'�o'w 4 © a n 0 33 Ii IE 3 PROP05tUR L�DRAFf PLAN 8Y OTHERS I, l }_ '\J (�'� F..-....3 J LJ IOR-1693 I �`-�N �✓OWN r T L�Ll APPLICANT _9� i�� �'CF APPLICANT I l � f �_ I 03 W ----�I✓✓/i'J a TRULLS N°�RTO ROAD ROAD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN LOTS 30 AND 31 CONCESSION } Z • 1 � I n O � W '* tat Z 0 DN: HRl-HR2.BL THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE BY-LAW NUMBER 92- being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By- law for the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle. WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle to implement a draft Plan of Subdivision. WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle recommends to the Region of Durham for approval of draft Plan of Subdivision 18T 90035, as red-line revised. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle enacts as follows: 1. Schedule 114" to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)" "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Type Three ((H)R3)" 2. Schedule "A" attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 3. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 35 of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 1992. BY-LAW read a second time this day of 1992. BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 1992. MAYOR CLERK This is Schedule "A" to By-law 92 --, passed this day. of , 1992 A.D. H GH`�•� N; —� WAY © .. ZONING CHANGE FROM f—k 11(H)RI" TO "(H)R3" LOT 31 k L . �� ZONING CHANGE FROM CONCESSION 2 II (H)RI TO (H)R2 STN , ZONING TO REMAIN"(H)RI" k 'o }g J ZONING TO REMAIN 11EP" $ *.., 0 25 50 IOOm R� 50 40 302010 0 IJ °1 ' •ttarorm SAM]4/NGNAM Mayor Clerk LOT 32 LOT 31 LOT 30 N R1 ( NASH ROAD !I V 1 I EP R1 !RI R4 HIGHWAY R 1 N8 2 I "� 1 \� of C2 U R1 I N R2 i=z 0: 0 — oNf Ci 5 R1 ( 1 I J I w RI 0 _ I ' it z I I N (H R5 EP Rl i EP W W R" (H)R1 Z a R2-2 EP R2 0 I R33 V R2 R s R2-2 i I 0 80 100 200 500m COURTICE y So�"��