HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAO-009-13 Cladiwit REPORT
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
Date: September 9, 2013 Resolution #: By-law#:
Report#: CAO-009-13 File #:
Subject: MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON'S COMMENTS ON THE REVIEW OF
ONTARIO'S LONG TERM ENERGY PLAN (LTEP)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended to the General Purpose and Administration Committee:
1. THAT the submission as set out in Report CAO-009-13 be approved as the
Municipality's comments on the review of Ontario's long term energy plan.
Submitted by: -
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
CC:FW
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379
REPORT NO.: CAO-009-13 PAGE 2
1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to set out the Municipality's comments on the
review of Ontario's long term energy plan.
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 The Province is receiving comments until September 16th on the review of the
2010 Long-Term Energy Plan (LTEP). It has issued a 32 page Discussion
Guide titled "Making Choices" to enable a discussion to determine what updates
should be made to the plan including the role of nuclear energy.
2.2 The review of the 2010 plan is in large part prompted by the fact that overall
energy demand is lower than forecasted in 2010. This is because the economy
has not recovered to the extent forecasted, major energy users experienced
business challenges and conservation increased. Peak demand by 2030 is now
forecasted at about 30,000 MW, down from 2010 forecast of about 33,000 MW,
although a "low growth" scenario could see this as low as 22,000 MW which is
lower than actual demand today.
2.3 The Municipality therefore needs to make a convincing case that the 2010 Plan -
which envisioned the Darlington refurbishment and New Build proceeding -
should be implemented.
2.4 With the Clarington Board of Trade, staff has studied the experts' review of the
supply and demand scenarios, attending a number of technical briefings
sponsored by the ministry and the OPA. Listening to these officials and
discussing with them has helped to build the Municipality's understanding of how
the government is viewing this complex subject, what is important to them and
how to frame the Municipality's submission effectively. We then meet with
experts in the nuclear industry and distilled their many contributions to bring
forward what it we have learned to be the relevant facts and arguments in a
language that will be effective in this particular context.
2.5 We also helped co-host a meeting of the Nuclear Technology Mayors' Council,
co-chaired by Mayor Foster with Oakville Mayor Rob Burton to learn more about
the perspectives of leaders of communities in the nuclear supply chain.
2.6 The Municipality also needs to build an effective relationship with this particular
ministry as its decisions have significant impacts on the community. It has
started that with two meetings with senior staff of the Ministry and the Minister's
staff. At the AMO conference, this included a meeting with the Minister himself.
REPORT NO.: CAO-009-13 PAGE 3
This meeting included the Mayor and Councillors Hooper, Novak, Partner and
Woo. This too has assisted with understanding how the ministry views the
issues and how the Municipality can best assist the ministry to arrive at a
mutually beneficial decision.
3. CONCLUSION
The attached submission seeks to put forward Clarington's position on matters
that are important to the Municipality and relevant to the Ministry. The deadline
for submissions is September 16th, and Council does not meet again until the
evening of the 16th thus GPA is asked to accept this report as Council's position.
CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — The recommendations contained in this
report conform to the following priorities of the Strategic Plan:
X Promoting economic development
Maintaining financial stability
Connecting Clarington
Promoting green initiatives
Investing in infrastructure
X Showcasing our community
Not in conformity with Strategic Plan
Staff Contact: Curry Clifford, MPA, CMO, Corporate Initiatives Officer
Attachment: Municipality of Clarington comments on the review of Ontario's long-term
energy plan
ATTACHMENT NO.1 TO
REPORT CAO-009-13
September 2013
Julie Green
Senior Policy Advisor
Ministry of Energy
Municipality of Clarington's comments on the review of Ontario's Long Term Energy Plan- EBR
Registry number 011-9490
Dear Ms. Green:
Please accept this as the Municipality of Clarington's comments on the review of Ontario's Long
Term Energy Plan- EBR Registry number 011-9490. This submission has been endorsed by our
Council. Please note that a parallel submission will follow from the Clarington Board of Trade
(CBOT).
Listening
This submission has the advantage of being informed by two recent meetings afforded
Clarington's elected and appointed officials with the Minister, his staff and Ministry staff. We are
grateful for the time provided Clarington for discussing the Long Term Energy Plan (LTEP) and
its importance to our community and our Province. We hope that is the start of a productive
relationship between the ministry and the municipality. We also much appreciate the ministry's
willingness to agree to Mayor Foster's request to add a meeting in our area to the province-wide
consultation on the LTEP. This September 12th meeting affords an accessible opportunity for
our residents, businesses and institutions to be heard.
Conservation
At the outset, we want to note our strong endorsement for the statement in the LTEP discussion
paper Making Choices that "the government is putting conservation first in our planning". We
couldn't agree more. Clarington's Council in the last year agreed to: invest $480,000 in energy
conservation retrofits of our own facilities that will return our investment within five years;
encouraging energy conservation in new residential construction in an innovative pilot study
funded by the MOE and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities; formed the Sustainable
Clarington Community Advisory Committee.
Ministry setting the record straight on nuclear
Second, Clarington wants to make clear that we appreciate the ministry helping to set the record
-1-
straight about the benefits of nuclear by leading your section on Nuclear in Making Choices
with the statement: "Because of its reliability, safety and zero GHG emissions, the government
is committed to ensuring that nuclear energy provides a significant portion of Ontario's electricity
generation."
Answering your questions
Third, we wish to answer the questions you've posed about nuclear"Nuclear power provides
over half of Ontario's generation. What are your views on refurbishing existing nuclear units?
How should we proceed with nuclear new build?" Clarington shares the views of others who
have looked closely at the demand and supply scenarios and concluded that the plans for
nuclear refurbishments and nuclear replacement build in the 2010 Long Term Energy Plan were
well founded and should continue to be implemented. Please note, we suggest that it is more
accurate to refer to "new build" as "replacement build" as the proposal to build two reactors at
Darlington would replace the supply provided by Pickering Nuclear Station that is being
decommissioned in the not too distant future.
The ministry has the benefit of witnessing what can happen when demand for public
infrastructure is underestimated or decisions put off, whether it is in power supply in other
jurisdictions, e.g., California, or in other public infrastructure in Ontario. As community leaders
and infrastructure planners, we've learned that best value comes from taking an investment and
longer-term perspective when making choices for future generations. We would urge that here.
Now.
Importance of Nuclear to Clarington and Ontario
Fourth, it is critical that government know that the LTEP and the prominent role that nuclear
energy needs to play in it are very important to our community. And they are each very
important to Ontario's success. You will hear this from a diverse range of people, including:
• mayors representing communities across Ontario who have come together to create the
Nuclear Technology Mayors' Council under the co-chairmanship of Clarington Mayor
Adrian Foster and Oakville Mayor Rob Burton
• women who have brought their talent, care and dedication to the nuclear industry and
are represented through the organization Women in Nuclear
• academic institutions that are working with the nuclear industry to create well trained
professionals and continue Ontario's international leadership in this vital field
• large energy consumers - and job creators - represented by Canadian Manufacturers
and Exporters
• the nuclear industry, represented by the Organization of Canadian Nuclear Industries
(OCI) as well as by the Canadian Nuclear Association (CNA).
The Nuclear Advantage
From these many different interests the Ministry will have heard that nuclear is the cheaper,
cleaner,jobs creating choice for Ontario. The OCI put numbers to this: "Continued
investment in base-load nuclear generation will result in the best outcome for Ontario's
economy (up to 20% lower electricity prices, 100,000 more jobs and $60B economic benefit)
and the environment (100,000 MT less GHG emissions).
-2-
The detailed studies on these subjects are convincing and we encourage all who care about
Ontario's future to review and discuss these by contacting these organizations.
Community Support in Clarington for Nuclear
What the ministry may not hear as much about from these organizations is the depth and
breadth of community support here in Clarington for nuclear. It is part of the fabric of our
community. It has been for more than a generation —the atomic energy sign is in fact in our
Coat of Arms. Successive municipal councils have supported nuclear to our community and
before federal and provincial regulatory bodies.
There are well established, effective mechanisms in place to resolve any issues including the
Darlington Community Advisory Committee and the Durham Nuclear Health Committee. In fact
Mayor Foster has been asked to advise other municipalities on how to develop effective
community engagement on nuclear projects. And in another part of our municipality - Port
Granby -we are involved with the federal government in supporting a low level nuclear waste
project.
There is a very strong and productive relationship between our Municipality and the OPG in all
aspects of municipal administration -financial, planning, service delivery, e.g., joint fire services
and emergency preparedness training. We've taken that experience into our leadership in the
Canadian Association of Nuclear Host Communities and in the Nuclear Technology Mayors'
Council.
And the Clarington Board of Trade (CBOT) is actively involved with CNSC hearings, CNA, the
Darlington Community Advisory Committee and the nuclear supply chain to support industry.
The CBOT hosts an annual Energy Summit each fall to educate and foster collaboration with
the nuclear industry and have invited the Minister and Ministry to participate on November 7th
The University of Ontario'Institute Technology (UOIT) and Durham College have developed
educational programs directly related to nuclear and energy systems. We are also working to
build an understanding of the significant opportunities to optimize the OPG Training Centre to
showcase and train the world.
Summary and Conclusion
The dialogue to date with the ministry is appreciated and helps to builds a strong future for
Clarington and Ontario. It has assisted us to see the alignment of our shared interests around
conservation and the benefits of nuclear. And it has helped us to better understand the supply
and demand scenarios, confirming for us that the plans for nuclear refurbishments and nuclear
replacement build in the 2010 Long Term Energy Plan were well founded and should continue
to be implemented. We owe it to future generations to take this long-term perspective.
Dialogue with a wide range of people makes clear that nuclear is the cheaper, cleaner, jobs
creating choice for Ontario. Clarington is the place where this choice can be optimized. There
is wide and deep community support for nuclear. It is woven into the fabric of our community.
This contrasts sharply with what the government has experienced in many parts of Ontario with
other energy supply choices.
Clarington and Ontario would be well served by sticking with the 2010 plans for nuclear at
Darlington.
-3-