HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSD-067-04
.-
,
,
Cl!1lmglOn
REPORT
PLANNING SERVICES
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
Date: Monday, June 7, 2004
Report #: PSD-067-04
File#: PLN 17.9.4
(ks --Grit ;Jrtl--o'f .
B I #. . 02c:n<f - /5;).
y- aw ';Jcoq -N7 aoo<(-nS'3
~<f--/o<f -'JrflY-1 S'S'
Subject:
MUNICIPAL ROSTER OF CONSULTANTS FOR THE PREPARATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDIES
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT report PSD-067-04 be received;
2. THAT Council endorse the document entitled "Municipality of Clarington - Guidelines
for the Preparation for the Preparation of Environmental Impact Studies", as attached to
this Report as Attachment No.1;
3. THAT the Roster of Consultants for the Preparation of Environmental Impact Studies,
as indicated in Attachment NO.3 of Report PSD-067-04 be approved, and remain in
effect for the period from July 1, 2004 to July 1, 2007;
4. THAT Council authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign the necessary by-laws to engage
the consultants on the EIS roster; and
5. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of
Council's decision.
687
REPORT NO.: PSD-067-04
Submitted by:
)
~
arie Marano
Director of Corporate Services
FL/DJC/df
2 June 2004
PAGE 2
Reviewed by: ~;.)
1.. Franklin Wu,
iF;! Chief Administrative Officer
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1 C 3AB T (905)623- 3379 F (905)623-0830
688
REPORT NO.: PSD-067-04
PAGE 3
1.0 BACKGROUND
1.1 Section 4.3.8 of the Clarington Official Plan requires that an Environmental Impact
Study be prepared for any development application located on or adjacent to a Natural
Feature identified on the Natural Features Map of the Official Plan. The Municipality is
to retain qualified professional expertise to undertake the Study, with the cost of the
Study to be borne by the developer.
1.2 The Guidelines for the Preparation of Environmental Impact Studies, was approved by
Council in October 1996. Over the past eight years, many Environmental Impact
Studies have been undertaken and completed. In addition, a number of development
applications have been checked to determine whether an EIS would be required. Staff
have reviewed and revised the Guidelines in light of these experiences and modified the
Guidelines and prequalification process to improve their effectiveness. These
modifications are based on the experience from working with the process, consultants.
and conservations authorities. Staff have also taken into consideration the comments
and suggestions from consultants. In addition, a review of other municipalities best
practices and processes were undertaken. Attachment #1 "Municipality of Clarington -
Guidelines for the Preparation for the Preparation of Environmental Impact Studies" is
the modified process staff is recommending.
1.3 The EIS Guidelines originally approved by Council in October 1996 have been revised
to reflect the new process for selection of the EIS roster and to reflect what is occurring
in actual practice. The major revisions that have been made to the Guidelines include:
. Refinement to address preparation of a study for development of lands located
within the Oak Ridges Moraine;
. Clarification that an EIS is required for proposed development activity when it is
within or adjacent to a natural feature;
. Requiring a Steering Committee only for major applications or where deemed
necessary by the Director of Planning Services;
. Providing that the applicant can assist in preparing the Terms of Reference for an
EIS study but clarifying that the Terms of Reference are to meet the
requirements of the Planning Services Department and Conservation Authority
staff; and
. Requirement for a public meeting only when necessary and elimination of
reporting on the findings of the EIS to Council unless the study was conducted in
support of an application that would require a decision by Council.
2.0 CONSULTANT SELECTION
2.1 The Municipality issued Pre-qualifications Proposal on May 4, 2004 with submissions
due May 25, 2004. A total of seven Expressions of Interest were received (see
Attachment 2). This translates into 5 expressions of interest in each of the 3 categories.
Some of the Expressions of Interest incorporate sub-consultants in order to provide the
range of environmental expertise required by the Municipality.
689
"
REPORT NO.: PSD-067-04
PAGE 4
,
2.2 In consultation with the Manager of Purchasing and staff from Central Lake Ontario
Conservation Authority and Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, Planning staff
reviewed all submissions. As a result of the review, the firms listed in Attachment 3 are
recommended for inclusion on the Municipality's Roster of Consultants for the
Preparation of Environmental Impact Studies in the three categories of Terrestrial
Resources, Earth Sciences and Hydrogeology Resources; and Aquatics and Fishery
Resources.
2.3 Based on the review committee's experience with the firms the interview process was
waived. The Review Committee evaluated the consulting firms based on the evaluation
criteria as set out in the proposal call. The recommended consultants are set out for
each category of EIS in Attachment 3 and listed in order based on the points received
for each submission. The top 3 consultants for each category are the EIS roster for that
specific area of study and will be approachEld in the order listed, if the higher listed firm
does not have time available to do the study or has a conflict of interest, the next firm on
the list will be approached.
3.0 CONCLUSION
3.1
Subject to Council's approval, the Roster of Consultants will come into effect
immediately and remain in effect until June 30, 2007.
,
3.2 A competitive bid process was used for the selection of the firms and the Expressions of
Interest included hourly rates, which are in force for the term of the Roster as set out in
the proposal call and contract. This process complies with Purchasing By-law #94-129,
in that a competitive bid process was part of the review and evaluation along with the
qualifications of the firms previous related experience, knowledge of Clarington and
OMB experience.
3.3 By-laws appointing the Mayor and Clerk to sign standard agreements with all the
consultants on the Roster are attached to streamline the process over the life of the
Roster.
:5
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - "Municipality of Clarington - Guidelines for the Preparation for the
Preparation of Environmental Impact Studies",
Attachment 2 - Expressions of Interest Received
Attachment 3 - EIS Roster by area of expertise
Attachment 4 - By-laws for the EIS roster consultants
690
"
REPORT NO.: PSD.067-04
PAGE 5
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Ms. Lisa Backus
Central Lake Ontario Conservation
100 Whiting Avenue
Oshawa, ON L 1 H 3T3
Mr. Rob Franklin, Planner
Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority
P.O. Box 328
Port Hope, ON L 1A 3W4
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates
513 Division Street
Cobourg, ON, K9A 5G6
Attention: Will McCrae
Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited
80 Commerce Valley Dr. East
Thornhill, ON L3T 7N4
Attention: Jeff Warren
Aquafor Beech Limited
14 Abacus Road
Brampton, ON L6T 5B7
Attention: David Maunder
Niblett Environmental Associates Inc.
1484 Highway 7A, P.O Box 160
Bethany, ON LOA 1AO
Attention: Phil Niblett
LGL Limited
Environmental Research Associates
22 Fisher Street
King City, ON L7B 1A6
Attention: Robert Nisbet
Morrison Environmental Limited,
1087 Meyerside Drive, Unit 1
Mississauga, ON L5T 1 M5
Attention: David Sawicki
Natural Resources Solutions Inc.
50 Westmount Road, Unit 230
Waterloo, ON N2L 2R5
Attention: David Stephenson
691
ATTACHMENT 1
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
The Natural Heritage System Maps of the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan
identifies the location of known permanent cold and warm water streams, wetlands,
significant woodlands, significant valleylands, Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest,
other natural heritage features, and the Oak Ridges Moraine and Lake Iroquois Beach.
Chapter 4 of the Official Plan requires that environmental studies be conducted prior to
consideration of development within or adjacent to features of the natural heritage
system. The purpose of these Guidelines is to set out a process for the implementation
of these studies.
Section 23.9 of the Official Plan requires a study to be prepared prior to development of
existing lots on the Oak Ridges Moraine if the lot is within 120 metres from a natural
heritage feature (Official Plan Amendment #33 - when approved).
2.0 PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
2.1 Determination of Need for a Study
2.1.1 A study shall be required when development is located within or adjacent to a natural
heritage feature. The natural heritage feature may be identified on the Natural Heritage
System Maps contained within of the Official Plan or it may be identified during review
of an application for development.
2.1.2 When initially considering development, the landowner should consult with the Planning
Services Department to determine if a study needs to be prepared.
2.1.3 Planning Services Department Staff will determine if the area subject to the proposed
for development is located within or adjacent to any of the natural heritage features
identified on the Natural Heritage System Maps contained within of the Official Plan.
Planning Services Department Staff will consult with Staff of the relevant Conservation
Authority, if necessary, to determine the need for a study. The following matters shall
be considered in this regard:
o The extent and nature of the proposed development;
o The significance and sensitivity of the natural heritage feature;
o If the proposed development is located on the Oak Ridges Moraine; and
o Opportunity for mitigative measures to be identified and implemented through
other approval processes.
692
"
2.1.4 Unless otherwise defined in Table 4-1 of the Official Plan, the lands subject to proposed
for development shall be considered as being adjacent to a natural heritage feature if
the area subject to development subject lands are located within:
o 120 metres of the edge of a wetland or wetland complex;
o 120 metres of the edge of a tableland woodlot;
o 120 metres of the top of bank of fhe valley for a cold water or warm water
stream;
o 120 metres of the edge of an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest;
o 25 metres of the edge of the Lake Iroquois Beach.
2.1.5 If the review of the proposed development by Planning Services Department Staff
indicates that a study pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Official Plan is required, the Planning
Services Department shall notify the applicant in writing:
o to advise that a study pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Official Plan is required;
o to advise of the process for preparing a the study;
o to request the applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Services Department
advising of their willingness to participate in and fund the preparation of a the
study;
o to advise that Planning Services Department Staff, in consultation with the
relevant Conservation Authority and other agencies as appropriate, will require a
Terms of Reference for the study;
o to advise the applicant that to facilitate advancing the process the applicant and
their consulting planner can draft a Terms of Reference for review, modification
and approval by the Planning Services Department;
o to advise of the matters that will be taken into consideration in the preparation of
the Terms of Reference, including:
. the matters outlined in Chapter 4 of the Official Plan;
. the extent and nature of the proposed development;
. the need for a scoped/site-specific or comprehensive study;
. the need for a four-season study.
o to advise that the Planning Services Department shall retain a consultant to
undertake a study in accordance with Section 4.2 of these Guidelines.
o to advise that if a study is not prepared for the development, the Planning
Services Department will recommend to the appropriate approval authority that
the development not be approved.
2.1.6 If the review of the proposed development by Planning Services Department Staff
indicates that a study is required pursuant to Section 23.9 of the Official Plan, the
Planning Services Department shall notify the applicant in writing of the need for the
study and address the same matters as set out in Section 2.15 above, with the
exception that the applicant will be required to select and retain the consultant to
undertake the study.
693
2.1.7 The Planning Services Department shall retain a consultant to undertake a study in
accordance with Section 4.2 of these Guidelines with the following exceptions:
o Existing lots of record on the ORM where an individual house is being proposed,
or
o an addition to an existing house within the ORM.
In these cases the landowner may select a suitable qualified consultant.
2.2 Steering Committee
2.2.1 For major development applications or where otherwise deemed appropriate by the
Director of Planning Services, a Steering Committee shall be created to administer the
preparation of the study identified in Section 2.1.65 of these Guidelines. The Steering
Committee will be comprised as follows:
o Clarington Planning Services staff;
o Clarington Public Works staff (if necessary/appropriate);
o Durham Region Planning staff (if necessary/appropriate);
o Conservation Authority staff;
o developer representative;
o citizen representative (if necessary/appropriate).
Planning Services staff will contact a citizens' group, the residents in the area of the
development application, and/or any other groups in order to identify an appropriate
citizen representative to sit on the Steering Committee. Appointment to the Steering
Committee is at the discretion of the Director of Planning Services.
2.2.2 The Steering Committee shall review the consultant's reports and provide constructive
comments and input to assist the consultant in finalizing the study.
2.2.3 Every effort will be made to help the members of the Steering Committee reach a
consensus regarding the consultant's reports. However, in the event of a disagreement
between or among the members of the Steering Committee regarding the consultant's
report, the final decision shall rest with Clarington Planning Services Staff.
2.2.4 Section 2.2 of these guidelines is not applicable for studies undertaken in accordance
with Section 23.9 of the Official Plan.
2.3 Public Participation
2.3.1 For major development applications or where otherwise deemed appropriate by the
Director of Planning Services, a Public Information Centre will be held after the
submission of the first draft of the study. The purpose of the Information Centre will be
to present and explain the study to the public, and to receive the public's comments on
the study.
694
2.3.2 The Public Information Centre will be attended by the consultant and appropriate staff
from the Municipality of Clarington.
2.3.3 Notice of the Public Information Centre will be advertised in appropriate newspapers
and mailed to all persons on the Notification List for the subject development
applications, a minimum of two weeks prior to the Public Information Centre.
2.3.4 The Public Information Centre will be held on a weekday evening at a location within or
as close to the affected community the lands subject of the development application as
possible.
2.3.5 Section 2.3 of these guidelines is not applicable for studies undertaken in accordance
with Section 23.9 of the Official Plan.
2.4 Study Findings and Reporting to Council
2.4.1 The consultant's final report shall address the requirements of Chapter 4 of the Official
Plan, assess whether the development proposed would have an unacceptable impact
on the natural heritage feature or its ecological functions, and make recommendations
regarding measures to implement the findings of the study. Recommended measures
may include:
o modifications to the proposed development, including the identification of areas
to be preserved in their natural state;
o engineering techniques;
o conditions of draft approval for a proposed plan of subdivision;
o conditions of site plan approval;
o specific policies and/or designations in the Official Plan;
o specific provisions in the implementing zoning by-law;
o monitoring programs;
o construction techniques and management.
2.4.2 If a study is prepared in association with an application for Official Plan Amendment,
Rezoning, Plan of Subdivision or Plan of Condominium, then the findings of the study
shall be documented within a recommendation report for the subject application to be
presented at a regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee.
2.4.3 If needed, the consultant may be required to make a presentation on the findings of the
study at a regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee.
2.4.4 Notice of the presentation will be mailed to all persons on the Notification List a
minimum of two weeks prior to the meeting. This provision is not applicable for studies
undertaken in accordance with Section 23.9 of the Official Plan.
695
3.0 STUDY FUNDING
3.1 The developer shall be responsible for the full cost of the study, including consultant's
costs, the advertising of notices, rental of meeting rooms, but excluding Municipal Staff
costs.
3.2 At such time as a consulting firm has been selected to undertake the study and a cost
for the entire study has been determined, the applicant shall provide funding for an
amount equal to the full cost of the study.
3.3 A contract between the Municipality and the consulting firm to undertake the study shall
not be finalized until such time as the necessary funding for the entire study has been
secured.
3.4 Items 3.2 and 3.3 of these Guidelines are not applicable for studies undertaken in
accordance with Section 23.9 of the Official Plan.
4.0 CONSULTANT SELECTION
4.1 Developina a List of Consultants
4.1.1 The Planning Services Department will develop and maintain a roster of qualified firms
or consulting teams to prepare the studies. Only those consultants on the roster will be
contacted by the Municipality to submit proposals for the preparation of individual
studies.
4.1.2 The Municipality, in consultation with the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority
and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, will request a number of qualified
consulting firms to submit Expressions of Interest or Prequalifications. The consulting
firms will be requested to indicate the following:
o qualified personnel within each of the major environmental disciplines (Earth
Science and Hydrogeology; Terrestrial Resources; and Aquatic and Fishery
Resources);
o sub-consultants;
o ratio of timelrates per hour anticipated to be spent on a study for each member
of the consulting team;
o capability to assist the Municipality in developing and maintaining environmental
information in a GIS environment;
o capability to communicate the results of their studies.
4.1.3 The Planning Services Department will review the Expressions of Interest or
Prequalifications in consultation with the Conservation Authorities and the Municipality
of Clarington Manager of Purchasing. On the basis of this review, Staff will recommend
to Council the selection of three consulting firms for each area of discipline. These firms
696
will comprise the Municipality's roster. The Municipality will renew the list every three
years or as required (eg. key personnel leaving one of the consulting firms).
4.1.4 Upon approval by Council of the EIS roster, by-laws will be passed authorizing the
Mayor and Clerk to execute contracts with the firms listed on the roster.
4.2 Selecting a Consultant for Individual Studies
4.2.1 When Staff determines that a study is required, the Planning Services Department in
consultation with the Conservation Authority, will determine the key area of
environmental discipline to be studied, and then from the roster determine which firm or
consulting team will be invited to submit a proposal.
4.2.2 Planning Services Department Staff and staff from the appropriate Conservation
Authority will review the proposal submitted by the consultant and, on the basis of this
review, will recommend that the study proceed. If the selected consultant declines, or
the proposal is not acceptable, the Planning Services Department will offer the next
team on the roster the opportunity to undertake the study.
4.2.3 The Director of Planning Services is authorized to approve a specific study proposal by
a consultant on the roster provided that funding to cover the full costs of the study has
been provided by the applicant.
697
ATTACHMENT 2
EIS Pre-Qualifications Proposal - Firms Submitting and Categories
o Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, 513 Division Street, Cobourg, ON, K9A 5G6
With Morrison Environmental Limited
Earth Sciences and Hydrogeology Resources
o Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited, 80 Commerce Valley Dr. East, Thornhill, ON,
L3T 7N4
Earth Sciences and Hydroge%gy Resources, Aquatic and Fishery Resources, Terrestria/
Resources
o Aquafor Beech Limited, 14 Abacus Road, Brampton, ON, L6T 5B7
Earth Sciences and Hydrogeology Resources, Aquatic and Fishery Resources, Terrestria/
Resources
o Niblett Environmental Associates Inc., 1484 Highway 7A, P.O Box 160, Bethany, ON,
LOA 1AO with Geo-Logic Inc.
Earth Sciences and Hydroge%gy Resources, Aquatic and Fishery Resources, Terrestrial
Resources
o LGL Limited, Environmental Research Associates, 22 Fisher Street, King City, ON,
L7B 1A6
Aquatic and Fishery Resources, Terrestria/ Resources
o Morrison Environmental Limited,1087 Meyerside Drive, Unit 1, Mississauga, ON,
L5T 1 M5
Earth Sciences and Hydrogeology Resources
o Natural Resources Solutions Inc., 50 Westmount Road, Unit 230, Waterloo, ON,
N2L 2R5
Aquatic and Fishery Resources, Terrestrial Resources
698
"
ATTACHMENT 3
Municipality's Roster of Consultants for EIS (Environment Impact Studies) based on the
categories of specialty set out in the proposal call.
Earth Science and Hydrogeology Resources'
1. Aquafor Beech Limited
2. Totten Sims Hubicki (TSH) with Morrison
3. Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited (MMM)
Terrestria/ Resources'
1. Aquafor Beech Limited
2. Niblett Environmental Associates
3. Marshall Macklin Monahan
Aquatic and Fishery Resources'
1. Niblett Environmental Associates
2. Aquafor Beech Limited
3. LGL Limited, Environmental Research Associates
. Wetlands may fall into any of the three categories (the areas of specialty) and will be
determined during the preparation of the terms of reference.
699
ATTACHMENT 4
"
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW 2004-
being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation of the Municipality
of Clarington and Totten Sims Hubicki Associates. 513 Division Street. Cobourg,
ON, K9A 5G6 to enter into an agreement for consulting services for the Environmental
Impact Studies Roster in the area of Earth Sciences and Hydrogeoiogy Resources as
per their proposal of May 25, 2004
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS
FOllOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation
of the Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation Seal, a contract between.
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates. Cobourg, Ontario, and said Corporation.
By-law read a first and second time this
day of
2004
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this
day of
2004
John Mutton, Mayor
Patti L Barrie, Municipal Clerk
699001
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON
BY-lAW 2004-
being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation of the Municipality of
Clarington and Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited. 80 Commerce Valley Dr. East,
Thornhill ON, l3T 7N4 to enter into an agreement for consulting services for the
Environmental Impact Studies Roster in the area of Earth Sciences and Hydrogeology
Resources, and Terrestrial Resources as per their proposal of May 25,2004
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS
FOllOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute. on behalf of the Corporation
of the Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation Seal, a contract between,
Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited, Thornhill, Ontario. and said Corporation.
By-law read a first and second time this
day of
2004
BY-lAW read a third time and finally passed this
day of
2004
John Mutton. Mayor
Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk
699002
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW 2004-
being a By-law to authorize a contract betWeen the Corporation of the Municipality of
Clarington and Aquafor Beech Limited, 14 Abacus Road, Brampton, ON, l6T 5B7 to
enter into an agreement for consulting services for the Environmental Impact Studies
Roster I the area of Earth Sciences and Hydrogeology Resources. Terrestrial
Resources, and
Aquatic and Fishery Resources as per their proposal of May 25. 2004
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS
FOllOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the Corporation
of the Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation Seal, a contract betWeen,
Aquafor Beech Limited, Brampton, Ontario, and said Corporation.
By-law read a first and second time this
day of
2004
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this
day of
2004
John Mutton, Mayor
Patti L. Barrie. Municipal Clerk
699003
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW 2004-
being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation of the Municipality of
Clarington and Niblett Environmental Associates Inc., 1484 Highway 7A. P.O Box 160.
Bethany. ON, LOA 1AO to enter into an agreement for consulting services for the
Environmental Impact Studies Roster in the area of Terrestrial Resources Aquatic and
Fishery Resources as per their proposal of May 20, 2004
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS
FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute. on behalf of the Corporation
of the Municipality of Clarington and seal with the Corporation Seal. a contract between,
Niblett Environmental Associates Inc., Bethany, Ontario. and said Corporation.
By-law read a first and second time this
day of
2004
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this
day of
2004
John Mutton. Mayor
Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk
699004
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON
BY-lAW 2004-
being a By-law to authorize a contract between the Corporation of the Municipality of
Clarington and LGL Limited, Environmental Research Associates, 22 Fisher Street.
King City. ON, l7B 1A6 to enter into an agreement for consulting services for the
Environmentallmpacl Studies Roster in the area of Aquatic and Fishery Resources as
per their proposal of May 25, 2004
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ClARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS
FOllOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute. on behalf of the Corporation
of the Municipality of Clarington and seal w~h the Corporation Seal, a contract between,
lGl limited, Environmental Research Associates. King City. Ontario, and said
Corporation.
By-law read a first and second time this
day of
2004
BY-lAW read a third time and finally passed this
day of
2004
John Mutton, Mayor
Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk
699005