The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/24/2013Clarl'ngton Leading the Way 1. 2. 3. 4. N GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE DATE: June 24, 2013 TIME: 9:30 A.M. PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEETING CALLED TO ORDER DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST ANNOUNCEMENTS ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING(S) (a) Minutes of a Regular Meeting of June 10, 2013 4 -1 PUBLIC MEETINGS (a) Application to Amend the Zoning By -law 84 -63 5 -1 Applicant: Stephen Krezanowski Report: PSD- 040 -13 DELEGATIONS (Draft List at Time of Publication — To be Replaced with Final 6 -1 List) (a) Michael Hackenberger, Co- Owner, Bowmanville Zoo, Regarding Noise Complaints and Giraffes (b) Kenneth Kerrigan, Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (c) Leslie Kerrigan, Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (d) Jarett Hebert, Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (e) Tricia Hebert, Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (f) Brian Crow, Adam Breitkreuz, Shannon McNevan, Chris Paterson, Republic Live, Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 G.P. & A. Agenda - 2 - June 24, 2013 7. PRESENTATIONS (a) Nicole Granzotto or Carlos Salazar, Regarding Report PSD- 043 -13, Official Plan Review Growth Management and Draft Land Budget 8. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) PSD- 040 -13 An Application to Amend the Zoning By -Law to Allow for 8 -1 the Severance of an Existing Single Detached Dwelling from Lands to be Retained for Future Development Applicant: Steve Krezanowski (b) PSD- 041 -13 Policies for Telecommunications Antenna and Towers 8 -10 (c) PSD- 042 -13 Designated Heritage Property Minor Alterations 8 -23 (d) PSD- 043 -13 Official Plan Review 8 -26 Growth Management and Draft Land Budget (e) PSD- 044 -13 Noise Fence for Lots on West Side of Vivian Drive 8 -88 9. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) EGD- 021 -13 Monthly Building Report Activity for May, 2013 . 9 -1 (b) EGD- 022 -13 Cost Recovery for Entrance Installations 9 -8 (c) EGD- 023 -13 Proposal to Close and Convey Two Adjoining Right -of 9 -13 Ways Situated in Lot 17, Concession 2, Former Township of Darlington (Hampton) (d) EGD- 024 -13 Proposal to Close and Convey a Portion of a Road 9 -17 Allowance (McKnight Road) Situated Between Lots 26 & 27, Concession 1, Former Township Of Darlington (e) EGD- 025 -13 Engineering Services Projects Update 9 -22 10. OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT (a) OPD- 011 -13 Winter Budget Report 10 -1 11. EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) ESD- 005 -13 Emergency and Fire Services — 2012 Annual Report 11 -1 12. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT No Reports G. P. &A. Agenda - 3 - June 24, 2013 13. MUNICIPAL CLERK'S DEPARTMENT (a) CLD- 023 -13 Appointments to Newcastle Arena Board 13 -1 14. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) COD - 017 -13 Tender CL2013 -08, 2013 Surface Asphalt, Various 14 -1 Locations (b) COD - 018 -13 Fire Hall #4 —Communications Tower Co- location 14 -8 Agreement 15. FINANCE DEPARTMENT No Reports 16. SOLICITOR'S DEPARTMENT See Confidential Reports 17. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE (a) CAO- 006 -13 "Value Added Service" Audit 17 -1 (b) CAO- 007 -13 Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 17 -7 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park 18. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 19. OTHER BUSINESS 20. COMMUNICATIONS None 21. CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS (a) Verbal OMB Appeals — Prestonvale Heights Limited Report from Municipal Solicitor 22. ADJOURNMENT Leading the SVuy General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 Minutes of a meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on Monday, June 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers. 121014 wof c Present Were: Mayor A. Foster Councillor R. Hooper Councillor M. Novak Councillor J. Neal Councillor W. Partner Councillor C. Traill Councillor W. Woo Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu Municipal Solicitor, A. Allison Director of Engineering Services, T. Cannella (until 5:07 p.m.) Director of Community Services, J. Caruana (until 5:07 p.m.) Director of Planning Services, D. Crome Director of Operations, F. Horvath (until 5:07 p.m.) Director of Finance/Treasurer, N. Taylor (until 5:07 p.m.) Director of Emergency & Fire Services, G. Weir (until 5:07 p.m.) Municipal Clerk, P, Barrie Committee Coordinator, J. Gallagher (until 4:17 p.m.) Mayor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest stated at this meeting. ANNOUNCEMENTS Councillor Traill announced the Samuel Wilmot Nature Area will be holding the annual Birds of Prey Event on Saturday, June 15, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in the Toronto St. Parking Lot. Councillor Woo announced the following upcoming events: • The Heart & Stroke Big Bike Event today, June 10, 2013 between 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. at the Kelsey's Restaurant in Bowmanville. • Clarington Day on Sunday, June 16, 2013 at the Courtice Flea Market. - 1 - 4 -1 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 Councillor Hooper announced the following events: Doors Open Clarington on June 8, 2013. Rockin' Rotary Ribfest, June 7 to 9, 2013, at the Garnet B. Rickard Recreation Complex. Councillor Hooper announced the following upcoming events: • Annual Historic Downtown Bowmanville Business Improvement Area's Summerfest and Rick Patterson Memorial Car Show between June 20, 2013 and June 22, 2013 in Downtown Bowmanville. • Rotary Park's Concert in the Park series starting on Thursday, June 13, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. • Official Groundbreaking Ceremony of the Durham Regional Police Service - Clarington Police Complex on Monday, June 10, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. at 2210 Bloor Street. ® Clarington Master Fire Plan Public Meeting on Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers. Councillor Novak announced the following events: Doors Open Clarington on June 8, 2013. Rockin' Rotary Ribfest, June 7 to 9, 2013, at the Garnet B. Rickard Recreation Complex. Councillor Novak announced the following upcoming events: • Official Groundbreaking Ceremony of the Durham Regional Police Service - Clarington Police Complex on Monday, June 10, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. at 2210 Bloor Street, Courtice. • Clarington Day on Sunday, June 16, 2013 at the Courtice Flea Market. • Official Launch of the Durham Region Transit PULSE Bus Rapid Transit Service on Friday, June 14, 2013. ® Enbridge Open House - Line 9 Reversal Project on Wednesday, June 19 between 5:00 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. at the Clarington Beech Centre. Councillor Partner announced the following upcoming events: Girls Night Out on Thursday, June 13th between 6:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. in downtown Orono. Orono Horticultural Society Celebration of the Construction and Completion of the Living Wall at the Clarke Museum in Kirby on Friday, June 14, 2013 at 5:00 p.m. -2- 4 -2 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 Giant Yard Sale on Saturday, June 15, 2013 at the Kendal Community Centre. Legends of the Autobahn on Saturday, June 15, 2013 and Sunday, June 16, 2013 at the Canadian Tire Motorsport Park, Mayor Foster announced the success of the Rockin' Rotary Ribfest, June 7 to 9, 2013, at the Garnet B. Rickard Recreation Complex, Mayor Foster announced the following upcoming events: • Official Groundbreaking Ceremony of the Durham Regional Police Service - Clarington Police Complex on Monday, June 10, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. at 2210 Bloor Street, Courtice. • Holy Trinity Catholic Secondary School in Courtice 10th Anniversary Celebration today, Monday, June 10, 2013 at 5:00 p.m. • Pathfinders Awards at Faith United.Church tonight, Monday, June 10, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. • St. Marys Cement 7th Annual Open House on Saturday June 15, 2013 between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. • Safe Communities Advisory Committee Cleanup'of Bowmanville Valley Lands on Saturday, June 15, 2013 between 9:00 a.m. and noon. • Clarington Museums and Archives' Puppet Show on Saturday, June 15, 2013 between noon and 2:00 p.m. MINUTES Resolution #GPA- 340 -13 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT the minutes of the regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on May 27, 2013, be approved. CARRIED PUBLIC MEETING There were no public meetings held. -3- 4 -3 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 ,> DELEGATION OF • M WOODS REGARDING REPORT WALKWAY Tom Woods was present to share his concerns regarding Report EGD- 020 -13, Trudeau Walkway. Mr. Woods stated that he is concerned that not all interested parties received notification of Report EGD- 020 -13. He referred to the email, dated June 8, 2013, from Eric Guenette, who had researched other walkways around Bowmanville. Mr. Woods added that Mr. Guenette has concluded that the Trudeau walkway has more issues than the other walkways. He urged that Report EGD- 020 -13 be re- evaluated to contain the opinions of the 100 persons who asked for the walkway to be closed. Mr.. Woods asked that the report be deferred until everyone is notified properly. He asked that any signs to be installed should include times for enforcement. Mr. Woods stated that the Trudeau Drive Walkway is not a school drop off zone and should not be used as such. He stated that he feels that the opinions of 100 petitioners have been stifled. Mr. Woods urged Council to close the walkway. He relayed an area incident which took place on Saturday, May 4, 2013 where a neighbour was verbally and physically assaulted by someone who was allegedly intoxicated. DELEGATION OF NIK PAPANIKOLAS REGARDING REPORT EGD- 020 -13, TRUDEAU WALKWAY Nik Papanikolas was present regarding Report EGD- 020 -13, Trudeau Walkway. Mr. Papanikolas stated that he had attended all of the meetings but yet did not receive an email notification regarding Report EGD- 020 -13. He stated that he found out about the report from Mr. Tom Woods. Mr. Papanikolas questioned the partial distribution of the report and placement on an agenda before complete notification. He stated that he believes that the report is biased. Mr. Papanikolas is concerned that the report failed to recommend the closure of the walkway despite a petition from 100 residents requesting the closure. He is concerned about the omission, in the report, of a petition to keep the walkway open. Mr. Papanikolas urged that all the information is necessary for Council to make a fair and equitable decision. He noted that the report is missing an examination of the relocation of the walkway to the east; costs associated with the recommendations, including the costs (and revenue) as a result of additional enforcement; cost of video surveillance; and cost savings for closure. Mr. Papanikolas noted that the report indicated that if the walkway was moved it may be moving a problem instead of eliminating the problem. 4 -4 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 Resolution #GPA- 341 -13 Moved by Councillor Traill, seconded by Councillor Partner THAT the delegation of Mr. Papanikolas be extended for an additional five minutes. CARRIED Mr. Papanikolas is concerned with the statement in the report that it would take a further year to close the walkway, which he termed as "fear mongering ". He asked that the Committee consider the privacy and threat -risk assessment surrounding the implementation of a video surveillance program and to ensure the individual's privacy is protected. Mr. Papanikolas read an excerpt from the Ontario Privacy Commissioner guidelines r elated to video surveillance. He added that he found it disturbing that video surveillance was at the top of the report and that he believes the cost of this measure is not accurately reflected in the report. RECESS Resolution #GPA- 342 -13 Moved by Councillor Traill, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT the Committee recess for 10 minutes. CARRIED The meeting reconvened at 11:05 a.m. /1lk�21itCIW_Cr7�r•17 =1 Resolution #GPA- 343 -12 Moved by Councillor Traill, seconded by Councillor Neal THAT the agenda be altered to consider Report EGD- 020 -13 at this time. CARRIED -5- 4 -5 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 THAT Report EGD- 020 -13, regarding Trudeau Walkway, be referred back to Staff, until the General Purpose and Administration Committee meeting of September 9, 2013, for Staff's best efforts to address: ® All issues raised during the delegation of Mr. Nik Papanikolas ® The nine issues contained in the email correspondence, dated June 8, 2013, from Mr. Eric Guenette ® The issues and concerns raised during the delegation of Mr. Tom Woods; and THAT the Municipal Solicitor be directed to address the privacy implications, legal and cost wise, of video surveillance on the Trudeau Drive Walkway. CARRIED PRESENTATIONS There were no presentations. Councillor Woo chaired this portion of the meeting. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INFORMATION FOR NEW HOME BUYERS Resolution #GPA- 345 -13 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report PSD- 030 -13 be received; THAT the revised New Home Sales Facilities Policy (Attachment 2 of Report PSD- 030 -13) be approved; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD- 030 -13 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED LATER IN THE MEETING (See following motion) M 4 -6 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 Resolution #GPA- 346 -13 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Traill. THAT the foregoing Resolution #GPA- 345 -13 be amended by adding the following after the second paragraph: "THAT the notice, referred to in paragraph 1.1 of Report PSD- 030 -13 relating to train noise, be provided to any purchasers of houses within 500m of a railway as a separate document." MOTION LOST The foregoing Resolution #GPA- 345 -13 was then put.to a vote and carried. AN APPLICATION TO CREATE A COMMON ELEMENT CONDOMINIUM AND REMOVAL OF HOLDING SYMBOL APPLICANT: PORT OF NEWCASTLE EAST LANDS Resolution #GPA -347 -13 Moved by Councillor Partner, seconded by Councillor Neal THAT Report PSD- 038 -13 be received; THAT the request to deem the subject application exempt from Section 51 (Public Meeting) of the Planning Act be considered appropriate in the circumstances as authorized by Section 9(7) of the Condominium Act; THAT the application for proposed Plan of Condominium C -C- 2013 -0001 submitted by Port of Newcastle East Lands be supported; THAT the application to remove the Holding (H) symbol be approved, and the By -law attached to Report PSD - 038 -13 to remove the Holding (H) symbol for the subject lands be passed upon execution of the condominium agreement; THAT the Durham Regional Planning Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PSD- 038 -13 and Council's decision; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD- 038 -13 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED AS AMENDED LATER IN THE MEETING (See following motion) -7- 4 -7 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 Resolution #GPA- 348 -13 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Traill THAT the foregoing Resolution #GPA- 347 -13 be amended by adding the following as the fourth paragraph: "THAT, following installation of Regional services, the condominiums be disbanded at the developer's cost; and THAT the land be conveyed to the adjacent property owners at no cost." CARRIED The foregoing Resolution #GPA- 347 -13 was then put to a vote and carried as amended. DESIGNATED HERITAGE PROPERTY THE WALBRIDGE HOUSE 483 KING AVENUE EAST, NEWCASTLE APPLICANT: BRIAN AND AUDREY JOSE Resolution #GPA - 349 -13 Moved by Councillor Partner, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report PSD- 039 -13 be received; THAT permission be granted for works to stabilize the foundation and structure on the property identified as 483 King Avenue East, Newcastle, in accordance with Section 33(4) of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter 0.18; THAT the Director of Planning Services be authorized, on behalf of Council, to permit further alterations to the property identified as 483 King Avenue East, Newcastle, in accordance with Section 33(15) of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter 0.18; and THAT the Ontario Heritage Trust, the Clarington Heritage Committee, the property owner, and all interested parties listed in Report PSD- 039 -13 be advised of Council's decision. 4 -8 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 I -a 2101 Resolution #GPA- 350 -13 Moved by Councillor Partner, seconded by Councillor Traill THAT the Committee recess for lunch for two hours. CARRIED The meeting reconvened at 2:43 p.m. with Councillor Novak in the Chair. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT - Continued Resolution #GPA- 351 -13 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Neal THAT Report EGD- 019 -13 be received; THAT the proposal for the construction of sidewalk on the east side of Courtice Road from Moyse Drive to Nash Road be approved; THAT construction of the recommended sidewalk be completed in 2013; THAT funding in the amount of $75,000 for the works be allocated from the Development Charges Roads and Related Reserve Fund; and THAT, upon completion of the sidewalk works, the crossing guard at Moyse Drive and Courtice road be relocated to the intersection of' Nash Road and Courtice Road. CARRIED Report EGD -020 -13 was considered earlier in the meeting. (See Page 6) Councillor Partner chaired this portion of the meeting. 4 -9 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT CEMETERY BY -LAW AMENDMENT Resolution #GPA- 352 -13 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT Report OPD- 010 -13 be received; THAT the Cemetery By -law amendment as outlined in the proposed draft by -law (Attachment 1 to Report OPD- 010 -13) be approved; THAT the costs be expensed against the Operating Budget Account for Cemetery Maintenance, resulting in an over expenditure in 2013; and THAT Council recognizes that this cost be included in future annual budgets. CARRIED EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. Councillor Neal chaired this portion of the meeting. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CLARINGTON OLDER ADULT ASSOCIATION — ALTERNATE HOME Resolution #GPA- 353 -13 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Mayor Foster THAT Report CSD- 007 -13 be received; THAT the Terms of Reference for the Beech Avenue Community Liaison Committee be approved (Attachment 1 to Report CSD- 007 -13); and THAT all interested parties listed in Report CSD- 007 -13 be advised of Council's decision. -10- 4 -10 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 Resolution #GPA- 354 -13 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Partner THAT Report CSD- 008 -13 be received; THAT the Purchasing By -law be waived for the sale of hockey artifacts; THAT staff be authorized to sell the approximately 1,300 hockey artifacts to Mr. Garry Meyer and Mr. Mike Wigston for the amount of $50,000; THAT the funds received through the sale of the artifacts be deposited into the C.S. Capital Reserve Account; THAT the Municipality of Clarington be responsible for shipping costs of the Hockey Artifacts to Edmonton, Alberta; and THAT Mr. Garry Meyer and Mr. Mike Wigston be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED SCHEDULE OF' RATES AND FEES 2013/14 - 2014/15 Resolution #GPA- 355 -13 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report CSD- 009 -13 be received; and THAT Attachment 1 of Report CSD- 009 -13 Schedule of Rates and Fees for the two (2) year period, September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2015 be approved. CARRIED Councillor Traill chaired this portion of the meeting. - 11 - 4 -11 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June .10, 2013 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT Report CLD- 020 -13 be received; THAT the resignation of Andrew Kozak be received, with regret, and that he be thanked for his contribution to the Clarington Heritage Committee; THAT Joseph Earle be appointed to the Clarington Heritage Committee for a term concurrent with the term of Council; THAT Kim Vaneyk be appointed to the Abandoned Cemeteries Board for a term concurrent with the term of Council; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report CLD- 020 -13 be advised of Council's decision. W1 NAMING OF NEW NEWCASTLE FIRE STATION Resolution #GPA- 357 -13 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Partner THAT Report CLD- 021 -13 be received; THAT the name of the new fire station at 3333 Durham Highway 2 in Newcastle be "Alfred Alldread Newcastle Fire Station "; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report CLD- 021 -13 be advised of Council's decision. .- J -12- 4 -12 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 Resolution #GPA- 358 -13 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Mayor Foster THAT Report CLD- 022 -13 be received; and THAT the by -law attached to Report CLD- 022 -13, A By -Law To Regulate The Use of Municipal Boulevards, be approved. CARRIED AS AMENDED LATER IN THE MEETING (See following motions) Resolution #GPA -359 -13 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Partner THAT Report CLD- 022 -13 be tabled until the matter of parking on boulevards is addressed. MOTION LOST Resolution #GPA- 360 -13 Moved by Councillor Partner, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT the foregoing Resolution #GPA- 358 -13 be amended by adding the following: THAT the by -law be amended by adding the word "vegetables" to the end of the definition of "vegetation ". CARRIED The foregoing Resolution #GPA- 358 -13 was then put to a vote and carried as amended. Mayor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. -13- 4 °13 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 FINANCE DEPARTMENT There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. SOLICITOR'S DEPARTMENT The Solicitor's Department report was considered under the Confidential Reports section, later in the meeting. (See Page 19) CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER The Chief Administrative Officer's report was considered under the Unfinished Business section, later in the meeting. (See following) UNFINISHED BUSINESS INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER Resolution #GPA- 361 -13 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Addendum to Report CAO- 005 -13 be received for information. CARRIED LATER IN THE MEETING (See following motion) Resolution #GPA- 362 -13 Moved by Councillor Traill, seconded by Councillor Neal THAT..the foregoing Resolution #GPA- 361 -13 be amended by adding the following at the end: "THAT the Staff be directed to prepare a report to address the following questions arising from particular sections of Addendum to Report CAO- 005 -13: Part A: 3.1 "Hence, it is feasible to retain the services of an Integrity Commissioner used by another Municipality" =What would this process look like? -14- 4 -14 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 -How much do the other Municipalities' Integrity Commissioners charge? • Pickering • Toronto • Port Hope • Markham 3.3 "....we recommend funds be set aside in the 2014 budget. At a minimum, $25,000 hopefully is sufficient to cover three (3) complaints annually." -How much have the four (4) other Municipalities spent on complaints in a calendar year, i.e. 2012? -Why set aside funds when we do not know that there will be any complaints? -Why use an OHSA complaint as basis for an Integrity Commissioner complaint? There are far fewer procedural steps outlined in Code of Conduct than under OHSA. 3.5 "Hence, the number of complaints received by any municipality in a given year would not be helpful to assist Council to estimate the number of complaints that will be anticipated in Clarington." -This statement is conjecture. Knowing how many complaints have been lodged in the four (4) Municipalities who have Integrity Commissioners — 3 of which are larger than Clarington — would provide important data to members of Council regarding costs and frequency. - Council specifically requested this data.- Please provide the data regarding the number of complaints that Municipalities with Integrity Commissioners have had in a calendar year and the approximate cost of investigating these complaints, including the fees charged by the four (4) Municipalities so that members of Clarington Council can make an informed decision. 4.2 "Due to the infrequent nature in the use of an Integrity Commissioner..... the only option available would be to obtain services through contracting a third party.....ln fact, this is common practice in municipalities that have an Integrity Commissioner." - Please provide the details regarding the "common practice in (four) municipalities that have an Integrity Commissioner. This is the information that Council requested. -15- 4 -15 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 -Who does each of the four Municipalities use as an Integrity Commissioner? -Do these Municipalities have a "roster" as proposed in Addendum to Report CAO- 005 -13? 4.4 "Matters to be Considered in the RFP" -a) and b) — See Above. What are the required qualifications for the Municipalities who use Integrity Commissioners? Please provide the details regarding who these Municipalities are using, the fees they charge (i.e. the hourly rate for the Integrity Commissioners for Port Hope, Markham and Toronto, and the salary for the Pickering Integrity Commissioner) and what the protocol is for filing complaints with these Integrity Commissioners. MOTION LOST The foregoing Resolution #GPA- 361 -13 was then put to a vote and carried. RECESS Resolution #GPA- 363 -13 Moved by Councillor Partner, seconded by Councillor Neal THAT the Committee recess for 10 minutes. CARRIED The meeting reconvened at 4:25 p.m. OTHER BUSINESS REVIEW OF CLARINGTON'S FIREWORKS BY -LAW 92 -160 Resolution #GPA- 364 -13 Moved by Councillor Traill, Seconded by Councillor Partner WHEREAS Clarington's Fireworks By -law 92 -160 is very short and is not as comprehensive as many other Ontario Municipalities; AND WHEREAS Clarington's Fireworks By -law has not been updated since 1992; -16- 4 -16 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 AND WHEREAS fireworks have changed significantly in composition, size, manufacture, height and loudness over the years; AND WHEREAS the safety of Clarington residents is of paramount importance; AND WHEREAS the Municipality should take steps to enhance the safety of all Clarington residents by ensuring that our by -laws are up -to -date and comprehensive, particularly with respect to private, i.e. residential use of fireworks; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: THAT Staff undertake a review and update of Municipal By -law 92 -160 exclusively with respect to private use of fireworks by private individuals; THAT Staff look to the Fireworks By -laws of the City of London; the City of Ottawa; the City of Hamilton and the City of Windsor in updating and developing new provisions in the Clarington By -law; and that Staff incorporate provisions from these By -laws as necessary; THAT the following concerns, provisions and issues be considered and addressed by Staff in drafting the new By -law; a. Providing a list of Prohibited Fireworks. This may be achieved by contacting other Municipalities with lists and fireworks manufacturers in order to obtain information regarding: i. Noise Levels ii. Height iii. Assessment of "danger" level iv. Country of Manufacture v. Debris from firework (i.e. does the firework spray "confetti "; leave excessive debris, etc.) b. Setbacks from adjoining properties; vehicles and structures in residential neighbourhoods; c. Prohibition of deployment of fireworks on urban and residential streets, roadways, and sidewalks; d. Prohibition of "firecrackers "; e. Implementation of a 10:00 p.m. curfew for fireworks on "school nights" 17- 4 -17 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 f. Preparation of a scheme of graduated fines for violations of the various provisions of the By -law, including description of enforcement mechanisms and the preparation of a scheme of fines for the parents /guardians of youth found to be illegally setting off fireworks; g. Protocols for the safe storage, handling and ignition of fireworks including: i. Mandating the presence of a fire extinguisher and water source; ii. Guidelines for the safe storage, handling and ignition of fireworks; h. Providing an application and permitting process to allow for the deployment of fireworks in specifically, Municipally- approved locations; and i. Amendment of the number of days to set off fireworks to "two" days before /after Victoria Day and Canada Day, unless Canada Day falls on a Wednesday, in which case "three" days is permissible. THAT the aforementioned concerns, provisions and issues do not comprise an exclusive list, and that Staff be permitted to address any other issues, concerns or considerations in drafting the new By -law; THAT By -law Enforcement, KPRDSB, Emergency and Fire Services, Durham Regional Police, and MPP John O'Toole be notified and invited to provide input into the development of the new By -law; and THAT Staff use its discretion to determine an appropriate method of inviting public input on the above issues and proposals and solicit that public input. CARRIED Resolution #GPA- 365 -13 Moved by Councillor Traill, seconded by Councillor Partner THAT Clarington Council request provision of the draft Veridian agenda and financial statements at least one week prior to the Annual General Meeting. CARRIED General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 Resolution #GPA- 366 -13 Moved by Councillor Traill, seconded by Councillor Partner THAT the foregoing Resolution #GPA- 365 -13, with respect to the distribution of the draft Veridian agenda and financial statements, be distributed to all four shareholder municipalities. CARRIED Kci►iwri iilP►1X"A IWLF There were no items considered under this section of the Agenda. CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS BONNYDON LIMITED APPEALS TO ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND REZONING DURHAM HIGHWAY 2, COURTICE Resolution #GPA -367 -13 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT the recommendations contained in Confidential Report LGL- 004 -13, regarding Bonnydon Limited appeals to the Ontario Municipal Board Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning Durham Highway 2, Courtice, be approved. CARRIED LATER.IN THE MEETING (See following motion) CLOSED SESSION Resolution #GPA- 368 -13 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT, in accordance with Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, the meeting be closed for the purpose of discussing a report from the Municipal Solicitor. regarding Bonnydon Limited appeals to the Ontario Municipal Board Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning Durham Highway 2, Courtice, a matter that deals with advice that is subject to solicitor - client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose. CARRIED -19- 4 -19 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes June 10, 2013 RISE AND REPORT The meeting resumed in open session at 5:21 p.m. with Mayor Foster in the Chair. Mayor Foster advised that one item was discussed in "closed" session in accordance with Section 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001 and no resolutions were passed. The foregoing Resolution #GPA- 367 -13 was then put to a vote and carried. ADJOURNMENT Resolution #GPA- 369 -13 Moved by Councillor Partner, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT the meeting adjourn at 5:22 p.m. MAYOR 4 -20 WIN MUNICIPAL CLERK PUBLIC MEETING REPORT# PSD- 040 -13 STEPHEN KREZANOWSKI NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION F,eading the YYay AND PUBLIC MEETING The Municipality of Clarington has received a Complete Application for a proposed Zoning By -law Amendment: APPLICANT. Stephen Krezanowski PROPERTY. 3289 Cour-tice Road, Courtice Part of Lot 28, Concession 3, former Township of Darlington PROPOSAL: An application to, rezone lands to allow for the severance of an existing single detached dwelling on.a lot having an area of 2,867 square metres (0.7 acres), resulting in a vacant parcel to be held for future- development. No new buildings or structures are proposed. FILE MO.., • ZBA 2013 -0015 A Public Meeting to receive input on the application will be held on: DATE: Monday, June 24, 20113 TIME: 9:30 a.m. PLACE: CoUnCil ChaMberS, 2,d Floor, Municipal Administrative Contra, 40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario Additional information relating to the application is available for inspection between 8 :30 a.m. and 4:30 P.m. (during July and August 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.) at the Planning Services Department, 3rd Floor, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville', Ontario L1C 3A6, or by calling Anne Iaylor Scott (905) 623- 3379, extension 2414 or by e -mail at ataylorscott @clarington.net. If you cannot attend the Public Meeting on this application you can make a deputation to Council at their meeting on Tuesday, July 2, 2013, commencing at 7 :00 p.m. Should you wish to appear before Council, you must register with the Clerks Department by noon on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 to have your name appear on the Agenda. APPEAL If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions- to the Municipality of Clarington, Planning Services Department before the by-law is passed, the person or public body: i) is not entitled to appeal the decision of Clarington Council to the Ontario Municipal Board; and ii) may not be added as a party to the hearing of'an appeal before the Ontario Municipal. Board unless, in the opinion of the Board, ,there are reasonable grounds to do so. Dated at t unicipality of Clarington' this 24th day of May, 2013. �� tom- . • , David �t, P., R.P.P. 40 Temperance Street Director of Planning Services Bowmanville, Ontario Municipality of Clarington - L1C 3AS Cc: LDO DRAFT LIST OF DELEGATIONS GPA Meeting: June 24, 2013 (a) Michael Hackenberger, Co- Owner, Bowmanville Zoo, Regarding Noise Complaints and Giraffes (b) Kenneth Kerrigan, Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (c) Leslie Kerrigan, Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (d) Jarett Hebert, Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (e) Tricia Hebert, Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park M Brian Crow, Adam Breitkreuz, Shannon McNevan, Chris Paterson, Republic Live, Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park rI PLANNNG SERMCES DEPARTMENT PU UCH MEETNC MeetInge GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 24, 2013 Res®llufion #e Dy °11aw #o Reporrt#: PSD -040 -13 File #o ZBA 2013 -0015 Subject: AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE ZONING BY-LAW "' TO ALLO W FOR THE SEVERANCE OF AN E,'.ISTING SI NGLE DETACHED DWELLING FROM LANDS TO JF RETAINED FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: STEVE KREZANOWSKI It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD - 040 -13 be received; 2. THAT the applications to amend Zoning By -law 84 -63, submitted by Stephen Krezanowski for the future severance of an existing residential dwelling continue to be processed and that a subsequent report be prepared; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD - 040 -13 and any delegations be advised of Council's Submitted by: ATS /C P /df 17 June 2013 r av,d'�J. Crome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services Reviewed by:C3 Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 EMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 REPORT NO PSD 14 PAGE aPPLI�,�TIU�J DETr�ILS 1.1 Owner: Katherine Krezanowski (Estate) 1.2 Applicant: Stephen Krezanowski 1.3 Proposal: To rezone lands to allow for the severance or an existing single detached dwelling. The balance of the lands are to be retained for future development 1.4 Area: 4.8 ha (11.83 acres) 1.5 Location: Part of 28, Concession 3, former Township of Darlington, 3289 Courtice Road, Courtice 2.1 The subject lands are within the Hancock Neighbourhood in Courtice. The Hancock Neighbourhood Design Plan (NDP) was approved on April 17, 2013 and shows how the lands can be developed with residential uses,.roads, and the areas that require protection. 2.2 Stephen Krezanowski has submitted an application to amend the Zoning By -law to facilitate the severance of an existing single detached dwelling on a lot having an area of approximately 2,867 square metres (0.7 acres) from the balance of the property. 2.3 No buildings or structures are proposed to be built on the balance of the property at this time. 2.4 The subject dwelling is serviced by municipal water and a private septic system. There are no plans to extend sanitary services in.the vicinity of the subject lands at this time. Extension of sanitary services will depend on future development applications, complete with supporting studies. 3.1 A single detached dwelling (1952) exists on the subject lands. A Provincially Significant Wetland and forested area account for approximate 70% of the property's area. The remainder of the lot is maintained as lawn. ._ REPORT N®.: PSD- 040 -13 PAGE 3 FOGURE 1 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North - Residential dwellings on existing lots of record; Draft approved plan of subdivision (18T- 94027) South - Residential dwellings on existing lots of record; future alignment of George Reynolds Drive; agricultural operation East - Servicing corridor & trail system; significant woodlot and Provincially Significant Wetland West - Residential dwellings on existing lots of record; Provincially Significant Wetland c; Low Density Residential •- .�,.•, . ��'�'�:.�. - -- ` i' N v Medium Density Residential hl,' OEnvironmental Protection Areas Provincially Significant Wetland Existing Residential CS Future Convenience Store ?8T- -94027 �`•; Ems;.: I. 0 of w U H U }r I .:l Special ^� Study \- Area 7 ,�.�� ±c= ;.:`',• -se ` �• -dog .Rr ` -= `!'r Potential Severed Lot t�ti;-"'r` �„.' �t ;;-: •. .�:3, •.ate � �; l=��. R` \•:1�; �� \.1: "`.. 1`�.. 4 �'.�. �_1�'�.':�: EP CS ti •' Subject Lands Owned By Krezanowski Future Alignment of George Reynolds Drive I EXTRACT FROM HANCOCK NEIGHBOURHOOD DE' SIGN;PL�AN�. ::`:.` -�' 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North - Residential dwellings on existing lots of record; Draft approved plan of subdivision (18T- 94027) South - Residential dwellings on existing lots of record; future alignment of George Reynolds Drive; agricultural operation East - Servicing corridor & trail system; significant woodlot and Provincially Significant Wetland West - Residential dwellings on existing lots of record; Provincially Significant Wetland c; F°EF'OR O PAC 04 1: PAGE 4 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) promotes growth in settlement areas. The availability of suitable existing or planned infrastructure and public service facilities required to accommodate projected needs must be taken into account. Planning authorities are required to provide for a range of.housing types and densities. Development and site alteration shall not be permitted on lands adjacent to significant natural heritage features unless the ecological function of those natural heritage features have been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts. 4.2 Provincial Growth Plan The Provincial. Growth Plan directs growth to built -up areas where the capacity exists to best accommodate the expected population. The guiding principles include building compact, vibrant and complete communities while optimizing the use of existing and new infrastructure to support growth in a compact efficient form. 5.1 Durham Regional Official Plan The Durham Regional Official Plan designates the property Living Area with an indication of Key Natural Heritage and Hydrologic Features. Lands designated Living Area are to be used predominantly for housing with a wide variety of types, sizes and tenure. Intensification of existing areas is encouraged. The natural environment, including Key Natural Heritage and Hydrologic Features shall be given paramount consideration in light of their ecological functions and scientific, educational and health values. 5.2 Clarington Official Plan The property is designated Urban Residential and Environmental Protection in the Clarington Official Plan. A Medium Density Residential symbol applies with the intention that lands fronting on to Courtice Road can be developed at a higher density (townhouse units or low -rise apartment buildings, for example). The predominant use of lands designated Urban Residential shall be for housing purposes. The property has frontage on Courtice Road, which is identified as a Type A Arterial Road. These roads are designed to move large volumes of traffic and have a right -of -way width ranging from 36 to 50 metres. Environmental Protection Areas are recognized as the most significant components of the Municipality's natural environment. As such, these areas and their ecological functions REPORT NO.: PSD-040-13 PAGE are to be preserved and protected from the effects of human activity. The precise limits of these Areas are to be determined in consultation with the Conservation Authority. The property is within the Lake Iroquois Beach and contains, as well as being adjacent to a wetland, significant valleylands, and a tributary of Farewell Creek. The wetland is part of the Harmony - Farewell Iroquois Beach Provincially Significant Wetland. An Environmental Impact Study is required for any development within 120 metres of any natural heritage feature. Ov ZOO fl Ii! MATA Lam, 6.1 Zoning By -law 84 -63 zones the subject lands Agricultural (A) and Environmental Protection (EP). The current "A" zone does not support the creation of the new lot. rm,AEEUXJTKJKI��M 11,00126, 7.1 Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject site. A Public meeting sign was installed on the property by May 24, 2013. At the time of writing this report no members of the public have contacted staff about this application. ;i3) 8.1 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority ( CLOCA) CLOCA identifies the Natural Heritage System on the subject, lands, including a Provincially Significant Wetland and a tributary of the Black Creek. This system, including any associate buffers, is to remain free from development activities. Any development within 120 metres of the wetland boundary would require an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) to be completed. CLOCA requires a minimum of 30 metre buffer from the boundary of the wetland. However, since no new construction is proposed, and the new lot would be in excess of 30 metres from the wetland boundary, CLOCA has no objection'to the rezoning. CLOCA recommends that the Natural Heritage System be rezoned Environmental Protection. The entire parcel is within an area regulated by CLOCA and a permit is required prior to any development activity. 8.2 Region of Durham Regional Planning has identified that the lands are designated "Living Area" and has no objection to the application. The Region also highlights that the lands are connected to municipal water, and a private sewage system. The residence was connected to municipal water under the Region's "Well Interference Policy ". Under this policy, as part of the future severance application, Regional watermain frontage charges will be REPORT NO. FSD- 040 ':_; PAGE applicable to the severed land prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant will also be required to convey a road widening across the frontage of the severed and retained lands along Courtice Road. 8.3 OfherAgencies Rogers has no objection to the application. 9.1 Engineering Services Engineering Services has no objection, in principle, to the rezoning. Development on the vacant parcel will require subsequent development applications and further study. No development is to occur on the future vacant parcel. 9.2 Emergency and Fire Services Emergency and Fire Services has no concerns. 9.3 Building Division The Building Division has no objections. 10.1 The proposed rezoning to facilitate a future severance does not conflict with the recently approved Hancock Neighourhood Design Plan. The proposed rezoning is not achieving the ultimate density for the development of the land however it would not impede the future development of the lands. 10.2 Planning Staff and CLOCA have discussed the proposal and determined that while the rezoning /severance would be within 120 metres of a natural heritage feature, the proposed lot is in excess of 30 metres from a feature, and no new development and /or site alteration is proposed as a result of the two applications. The applicant maintains that the future severed lot containing the dwelling would not be further developed at this time, while the balance of the lands would remain vacant. As no new construction is proposed at this time, an Environmental Impact Study is not required as part of this application, but will be required as part of any future development applications in accordance with the Natural Environment and Resource Management policies of the Official Plan. 10.3 Further to Item 10.2, prior to drafting a recommendation report, Staff will explore the appropriate mechanism to prohibit construction of a dwelling on the balance of the lands to ensure no new construction and /or site alteration takes place on the balance of the lands. Future development applications and supporting studies, including.an Environmental Impact Study, will be required. REPORT NO.: PSD-040-113 PAGE 7 10.4 The proposed rezoning, if approved, would facilitate the creation of a lot with a depth of 94 metres. The intent is to ensure the future severed lot would have frontage on the future north -south road that is shown on the Hancock Neighbourhood Design Plan. Then, at such a time as the road and services are extended, lots could be further severed fronting on the new north -south road. The exact alignment of the new north -south road has not been determined at this time. Further discussion on the future alignment of this stretch of road may be required as part of this application. 10.5 Consistent with the recent approval of Official Plan Amendment No. 80, portions of the subject lands will be rezoned Environmental Protection to align with the Environmental Protection designation of the Official Plan. The limits of the Environmental Protection Zone may be refined during the review of future development applications. 11. CONCURRENCE — Not Applicable 12. CONCLUSION 12.1 The purpose of this report is to provide background information on the proposed rezoning application submitted by Stephen Krezanowski for the Public Meeting under the Planning Act. Staff will continue processing the application including the preparation of a subsequent report upon resolution of the identified issues. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Anne Taylor Scott, Planner 11 Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 -. Sketch of Area to be Rezoned List of interested parties to be notified of Council's decision: Steve Krezanowski I 0 N Property Location Map QCoauu-tpe6' N 8 . 3359 3351 6 3339 Subject Sites ' 3325 a i 3301 s 8 L a 3289 0 94.Om R 1�Ra Q 3265 Subject Site ® Proposed Severance ' L I jl U ry 3233 'i O i� Z A 20113 ®00115 Zoning By-law Ameuvdmeni! ih 3201 3191 .applicant: Stephen Krezanowski j J 0 x CD 0 �D rt ❑ n CD 4-1, 0 C? ID W - b L U UK 112 T N CD O D o3 m c� �h W M. IREP(o)[27 GAL A WING D -RMC S DE's. A, RTMF51T Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE.AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 24, 2013 Res®llution4: Cry -iaw : Reporrt# -: PSD- 041 -13 Gnu [leg: PLN 18.7 Suldjecta POL110ES FOR TELECOM MUN11CAT0NS ANTENNA AND TOWERS It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD - 041 -13 be received; 2. THAT the attached revised policy be approved; and 3. THAT the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and Industry Canada and any other parties listed in Report PSD - 041 -13 be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: ,'~ 7` I5avi J. Crome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services MM /CP /df /nl 17 June 2013 Reviewed by:(:j Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1 C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 MIZ i. 1.1 Advancements in wireless telecommunication technology have resulted in the rapid growth of the telecommunications industry. Industry Canada, under the Radio - communication Act is responsible for radio and telecommunications in Canada. In addition to issuing licences to radio and telecommunications carriers, they also approve the installation of the infrastructure, including antennas and towers. Local municipalities do not have the constitutional authority to prohibit telecommunication antenna or towers through the Planning Act. 1.2 The role of the Municipality is to issue a letter of concurrence or non - concurrence to Industry Canada and the proponent of installation proposals when municipal consultation is required by applicable federal policies. The Municipality must review the proposal for appropriateness of the proposed installation and oversee the public consultation process, where required. 1.3 There are many telecommunications antenna and towers (antenna systems) in the Municipality of Clarington, the majority of which have been erected in the last fifteen years. In the early 2000's, Planning Services Staff met with'representatives from Industry Canada to explore opportunities to minimize the impact of antenna and towers and notify the public of proposed towers. Industry Canada encourages municipalities to develop protocols to assist proponents in seeking the optimal locations for towers and to provide a procedural framework for notification, public consultation and obtaining concurrence with the proposal. In 2002, Clarington Council adopted the current policy for "New Telecommunications Antenna and Towers ". 1.4 The purpose of this report is to: • Provide an overview of federal procedures'with respect to establishing new antenna systems; • Provide an overview of current practices regarding applications for new antenna systems in Clarington; • Provide an overview of the recent Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Antenna System Siting Protocol Template publication; • Discuss how the Clarington Policy is proposed to be modified to conform with Industry Canada policies and procedures and the new FCM, protocol. 2.1 Industry Canada approves and licenses the location, installation and operation of antenna systems (including towers) based on federal policy and procedures. Proponents wishing to establish new Federally Regulated towers and significant antenna must do the following: consult with the local land -use authority, where required; REPORT O Pte) L14 PAGE consult with NAV Canada and Transport Canada to ensure antenna structures comply with painting and lighting requirements for aeronautical safety, where required; ensure that telecommunications facilities are installed and operate in a manner that complies with Health Canada's limits of exposure to radio - frequency fields emissions (Health Canada Safety Code 6); and comply with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2.2 Consultation with Local Land -use Authorities (LUA) Industry Canada wants to work together to find mutually agreed upon locations for new antenna systems. As such, it has defined roles for the local land use authorities, the proponent and itself. However, there are situations that are excluded from the requirement for consultation with the LUA and the public. The land -use authority has an opportunity to influence the location of towers over 15 metres tall, not only from a land -use compatibility perspective but from the community's perspective. It cannot however, prohibit the installation of an antenna system. The proponent is required to consult with the municipality on the proposal, consider local concerns and, if required, seek alternative solutions. The carrier must provide a written confirmation to Industry Canada that they have consulted with the local authority and have obtained their concurrence. The carrier must also outline any concerns and how they were addressed. Industry Canada approves the location of an antenna system. If the carrier and the land - use authority cannot reach an agreement, then Industry Canada will ultimately decide as to what actions need to be taken based on the information provided by both parties. Industry Canada expects the land -use authority.to make its views known to a proponent within 60 days. All aspects of the consultation should be completed within 120 days. 2.3 Industry Canada encourages municipalities to create policies to ensure there is a relatively consistent manner in which antenna systems are evaluated acid the public is notified. .This provides direction for optimal location of towers and antenna, site design and layout, public consultation process and approvals. There are a number of municipalities in Ontario with existing protocols. FCM has recently created an Antenna System Siting Protocol Template to assist municipalities across Canada in developing policies and protocols that are consistent with, Industry Canada procedures. 3.1 The current telecommunications antenna and tower policy is more than 10 years old. The purpose of the Council Adopted Policy.for "New Telecommunications Antenna and Towers" is to provide direction for selecting appropriate locations for antenna systems, which ultimately minimizes the number of such facilities and their visual impact, allowing for public input and providing a straight - forward process for the proponent for the installation of these facilities. Staff prepared this policy to ensure that installation of 8 -12 REPORT NO.: PSD-041-13 PAGE. 4 antenna systems are treated and processed in a consistent manner. Staff consulted with representatives of Industry Canada and four major carriers on several occasions throughout drafting these policies. � EC �-� TEP rza S''STE 1 SITI G Ff�L�T��CC�L_ TE ' F'L�TE 4.1 On February 28, 2013, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association announced a joint protocol, named the Antenna System Siting Protocol Template. The purpose of this protocol template is to provide municipalities with a tool to develop customized protocols for the siting of antenna systems within their municipality, according to the FCM Antenna System Siting Protocol Template publication. It goes on to say that, as the template was developed jointly by the FCM and the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association (CWTA), and is consistent with Industry Canada rules on antenna systems consultations, its use should result in consistent and predictable antenna system siting protocols. 4.2 The objectives of the FCM protocol are as follows: • To establish a siting and consultation process that is harmonized with Industry Canada's policies and procedures for reviewing land use issues associated with antenna system siting proposals; • To set out an objective process, criteria and guidelines that are transparent, consistent and predictable for the evaluation of antenna system siting proposals; • To provide an expeditious review process for antenna system siting proposals; • To establish a local land use consultation framework that ensures the Municipality and members of the public contribute local knowledge that facilitates and influences the location, development and design of antenna systems within the Municipality; • To contribute to the orderly development and efficient operation of a reliable, strong radio communication network in the Municipality; and . • To provide the Municipality with the information required to satisfy the requirements of Industry Canada regarding local land use consultation, resulting in an informed statement of concurrence, concurrence with conditions, or non - concurrence from the Municipality to Industry Canada at the end of the process. 1 so 5.1 The Clarington "New Telecommunications Antenna and Towers" policy already fulfils the core objectives of the new FCM protocol. Given that our policy was created more than ten years ago, it is appropriate to make minor modifications to bring it in line with the current Industry Canada procedures and the new FCM protocol. The proposed revised policy, renamed "Antenna Systems ", is contained in Attachment 1 to this report. 5.2 Proposed changes to the Clarington "New Telecommunications Antenna and Towers" policy are intended to harmonize our current policy with Industry Canada policy and procedures and the language contained therein. The structure of our policy and MM REPORT MO.: PSD-041-13, PAGE 5 procedures has not changed, though some of the wording and procedures. have. The revised policy. (Attachment, 1) is more consistent with language and procedures commonly used by the industry. 5.3 The following are the section headings of our current policy with highlights of proposed changes noted under each: Introduction Updated wording to conform with Industry Canada and FCM protocol language (e.g. replace "telecommunications facilities" with "antenna systems "). Purpose Remove language that reflected the newness of our current policy, as it was written over ten years ago; Updated wording to conform with Industry Canada and FCM protocol language, adding clarity, and strength to the statements therein. Policies - Deletion of old definitions (in part or in whole) and addition of new definitions (or parts thereof) based on those contained within the FCM protocol template; • Proposed definitions are consistent with those used by the industry; • Word "carrier" replaced by "proponent ", recognizing that it is no longer only the carriers who construct, own, and maintain. antenna systems; • Setback from road right -of -way removed, recognizing that in many cases it may not be desirable or possible to locate an antenna system 15 metres or greater away from a road; • Language added'to strengthen our policies regarding locating antenna systems in developing areas and other areas of prominence within the Municipality. Procedures • Updated wording, as in other sections; • Justification report submitted by proponent must address compliance with Health Canada's Safety Code 6; • Public consultation is not required (by Industry Canada) for antenna systems less than 15 metres in height or where the height of an antenna system is being increased by 25% or less; • Where a circulation area for public notice includes a mditi- tenant property (condominium, apartments etc.), all tenants shall be given notice; • Additions to the list of information to be included in the public notice; • Public notice to be delivered further in advance of the Public Information Centre, where required; • Letter of "Recommendation" renamed Letter of "Concurrence or Non - concurrence"; and • Requirement for payment of cash -in -lieu of parkland dedication deleted, as antenna systems are not processed as applications under the Planning Act. L REPORT J PSD-041-113 PAG = :, 5.4 While the purpose of this report is to discuss antenna systems policy and procedure, staff did inquire about fees collected by the other lakeshore municipalities in Durham. The intention of this was not to prompt a review of our,fees but to report on how we compare to other municipalities for information purposes only. The fees collected are as follows: Clarington - $5,395, Oshawa - $2,898 plus $0.30 per square metre of leased area, Whitby- $3,000, Ajar(-$7,145 and Pickering $2,700. None of the neighbouring Durham lakeshore municipalities collect additional fees or payments on top of those listed here. 6e CONCURRENCE — Not Applicable 7, CONCLU =M AND RECOMMENDATOONS 7.1 In consideration of the comments and discussion contained in this report, Staff respectfully recommend that the revised policy contained in Attachment 1 be approved. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN The'recommendations contained in this report conform to the following priorities of the Strategic Plan: X Promoting economic development Maintaining financial stability X Connecting Clarington' - Promoting green initiatives Investing in infrastructure Showcasing our community Not in conformity with Strategic Plan Staff Contact: Mitch Morawetz, Planner I Attachments: Attachment 1 - "Antenna Systems" Policy List of interested parties to be notified of Council's decision —' Not Applicable L; __ Attachment 1 To Report PSD- 041 -13 SUBSECTION: DEVELOPMENT GENERAL SUBJECT: ANTENNA SYSTEMS PSD -00008 APPROVED BY: Council DATE APPROVED: REVISED: November 25, 2002 • July 2, 2013 II-ZIIILeiZ9LW11 LOW F In order to keep pace with the demand for telecommunications service, there has been an increase in the number of telecommunications towers erected across the Municipality of Clarington and more are anticipated in the coming years. Industry Canada, the approval authority for regulating antenna systems, ensures that municipalities are consulted prior to the erection of towers and significant antenna structures unless the proposal falls within the exclusion criteria of the Industry Canada procedures. The role of the Municipality of Clarington is to provide comments with respect to land use compatibility and, where required, issue a letter of concurrence or non - concurrence regarding a specific proposal. The Municipality has no constitutional authority to regulate or prohibit telecommunications facilities. PURPOSE: To maintain policies and procedures that are harmonized with Industry Canada procedures and protocols for the installation of antenna systems, which emphasize the following: • Minimize the number of new antenna sites by encouraging co- location; • Encourage designs that integrate with existing and planned surrounding land use and public realm and minimize visual impacts; • Allow input from the public; and • Provide a straight - forward, objective process for the installation of antenna systems. POLICIES: 1. Definitions Antenna System shall mean an exterior transmitting device —.or group of devices — used to receive and /or to transmit radio - frequency (RF) signals, microwave signals, or other federally - licenced communications energy transmitted from, or to be received by, other antennas. Antenna Systems include the antenna, and may include a supporting tower, mast or other supporting structure, and an equipment shelter. Alternative Tower Structures shall mean man -made support structures that camouflage or conceal the presence of antennas or towers such as flagpoles, clock towers, church steeples, street lights, artificial trees and other everyday features. Co- location shall mean the placement of antennas and equipment operated by one or more proponents on a telecommunications Antenna System operated by a different proponent, thereby creating a shared facility. Equipment Shelter shall mean a structure containing equipment necessary to transmit and receive signals. Freestanding Antenna System shall mean a structure (tower, mast, etc) built from the ground for the MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Page 1 8 -16 SUBSECTION: DE L ®SENT GENERAL SUBJECT: ANTENNA SYSTEMS APPROVED BY: Council DATE APPROVED: REVISED: November 25, 2002 July 2, 2013 express purpose of hosting an Antenna System(s). Structure /Building- Mounted Antenna System shall mean an Antenna System mounted on an existing structure, which could include a building wall or rooftop, a light standard, water tower, utility pole or other. 2. Site Selection For New Antenna Systems a) The installation of new antenna systems is discouraged unless all other options within the proponent's search area have been explored and are considered not viable. The preferred methods of achieving additional capacity are: i. Co- location on existing Freestanding Antenna Systems or Structures /Buildings; ii. Location on hydro transmission towers; iii. Location of towers within or adjacent to hydro transmission corridors; and iv. Use of Alternative Tower Structures. b) Antenna Systems shall be located in a manner that minimizes visual impacts. When locating a new antenna system, the following shall be considered: I. There shall be no negative impact on significant natural features or hazard land areas; ii. Distances shall be maximized from residential areas, community and institutional uses, historical downtown areas, and waterfront areas; iii. Terminal vistas from existing and future roads and areas of topographical prominence will be avoided; iv. Locations and heights within urban areas or hamlets where Transport Canada will require lighting the tower should be avoided; v. Towers shall not be located on properties within the urban areas where development or redevelopment is contemplated as a present or future land use within the Clarington Official Plan; vi. Alternative Tower Structures should be used wherever possible, particularly in urban and hamlet areas; and vii. Towers shall generally be setback 100 metres from any residential building. c) Telecommunication facilities shall not be permitted on private property that is only accessible by an unopened road allowance. 3. Site Design and Layout a) New Telecommunication Facilities The following shall be considered in the site design and layout of new antenna systems: i) Planting of trees and shrubs around the perimeter fencing to mitigate the visual impact of the antenna system and equipment shelter; ii) An identification sign identifying the name and contact information of the carrier(s) must be installed and maintained at the location of the antenna system, in compliance with the Sian B MUNICIPALITY OF GLARINGTON L PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Page 2 DEVELOPMENT GENERAL r_D , 0 APPROVED BY: Council SUBJECT: ANTENNA SYSTEMS DATE APPROVED: REVISED: November 25, 2002 July 2, 2013 law, subject to the issuance of a sign permit from the Municipality of Clarington; and iii) Where alternative tower 'structures are not feasible, antenna systems and equipment shelters shall blend in with the character of the surroundings, including both colour and design. b) Roof Tops or Existing Structures When locating telecommunications facilities on rooftops or existing structures, carriers shall endeavour to minimize the visual impacts of such facilities by considering the following: is Utilizing alternative tower structures; ii. Screening should be provided such that the antenna system is not visible from the ground, to the extent possible; iii. Equipment shelters on roof tops should be setback from the roof edge not less than 5 metres; and iv. The colour and architectural style of the antenna and equipment shelter should blend in with the building or structure. 4. Other a) Owners shall remove antenna systems that have not been in use for two years. b) The Municipality will encourage buildings greater than 10 storeys to be designed to accommodate antenna systems. , rl 1. Pre - consultation a) Prior to the installation of antenna systems, proponents are strongly encouraged to consult with the Municipality's Planning Services Department, and Engineering Services Department to discuss the site search area, site. selection, including land use compatibility, sensitive visual areas and vistas, existing and proposed land uses and other potential impacts. Consultation with the Chief Building Official may also be required. b) The proponent is required to consult with adjacent municipalities within 500 metres, measured from the tower base, or the outside perimeter of the supporting structure, whichever is greater. The proponent shall provide written confirmation of this consultation to the Director of Planning Services. 2. Submission Requirements For the purposes of administration and processing, proponents will be required to complete an application for site plan approval. The application shall be submitted to the Municipality of Clarington Planning Services Department with the appropriate fees. Such applications are not processed under, Section 41 of the Planning Act. a) New Freestandinq Antenna Systems MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Page 3 8 -18 SUBSECTION: DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PSD -D0008 APPROVED BY: Council SUBJECT: ANTENNA SYSTEMS DATE APPROVED: REVISED: November 25, 2002 July 2, 2013 All proposals for new Freestanding Antenna Systems, where consultation with the Municipality is required by Industry Canada, will include the following information: i. Written justification from the proponent as to the need for the Antenna System and that the proposed location for the new tower is the preferred alternative. Structure /Building - mounted Antenna Systems, Co- location, Alternative Tower structures and compliance with Health Canada's Safety Code 6 shall be addressed in the justification; ii. A site plan showing the subject property, including the existing property lines, and /or the leased area (as applicable), site grading, existing'and proposed buildings, fences, buffering, existing and proposed landscaping, access, parking and type and height of the proposed Freestanding Antenna System; iii.' Pictures of the location and the proposed Freestanding Antenna System and associated facilities superimposed on the picture from four directions; north, south, east and west; iv. Two sets of stamped engineered drawings to identify the Freestanding Antenna System design; and v. A map showing the horizontal distance between the Freestanding Antenna System installation and the nearest residential zone and /or residential "dwelling. b) Structure /Building- mounted Antenna Systems All proposals for Antenna Systems'on structures and buildings, where consultation with the Municipality is required by Industry Canada, will include the following information: i. A plan showing the location of the proposed Antenna System and associated facilities on the structure or building; ii. Two sets of stamped engineered drawings to identify the Antenna System and associated facilities on the structure or building and anything required by the Clarington Chief Building Official; and iii. Pictures of the structure or building with the proposed Antenna System and associated facilities superimposed on the picture from four directions; north, south, east and west. c) Alterations to existing Antenna Systems Where modifications to an existing Antenna System are proposed, that are not excluded from municipal consultation, an amendment to the approved plans may be required and the corresponding fee must be remitted. 3. Public Consultation Process a) Public consultation may not required by the Municipality in the following situations: i) Roof top installations of Antenna Systems; ii) Additions or modifications, of existing Antenna Systems where the original height of the structure is not being increased by more than 25% and where the existing Antenna System is at least 15 metres in height; and iii) Antenna Svstems that are less than 15 metres above ground level. MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Am PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Page 4 SUBSECTION: DEVELOPMENT GENERAL SUBJECT: ANTENNA SYSTEMS PSD -D0000 APPROVED BY`: Council DATE APPROVED: REVISED: November 25, 2002 July 2, 2013 The Director of Planning Services may also exempt the proponent from the public consultation requirement following ,pre- consultation with the Planning Services Department and the proponent. Exemptions will generally be considered where towers are proposed adjacent to 250 kv or 500 kv hydro towers. b) Required Public Consultation i) Notice Requirements For proposed new Antenna Systems or significant additions or modifications to Antenna Systems, the proponent shall give written notice, by regular mail or hand delivered, to the owners and /or tenants of the lands within the circulation area of the subject property or leased area, adjacent Municipalities (where required), the Director of Planning Services, the Municipal Clerk, and all Members of Clarington Council. The circulation area for the notice is as follows: Within Urban Areas, except for — 120 metres or 4 times the height of the tower Future Urban Residential Areas whichever is greater In all other areas — 500 metres Where the circulation area extends onto a property with multiple tenants or residents (apartments, condominiums, commercial areas etc.) all of those tenants or residents must be notified of the proposal. 'The notice shall include the following information: • The location of the subject property, the leased area (if applicable) and the proposed location of the Antenna System on the subject property; • A plan that shows the Antenna System type, height, design, colour, associated structures, access locations and fighting; • A confirmation that the Antenna System will comply with Health Canada's Safety Code 6, which sets safe radiofrequency emission levels for these devices; • The rationale, including height and location requirements, of the proposed Antenna System; • Date, time and location of Public Information Centre; • The name and telephone number of a contact person employed by the proponent and the municipal contact person; and • A deadline date for the receipt by the proponent of public responses to the proposal. The Municipality shall provide a mailing list to the proponent. ii) Public Information Centre The Public Information Centre (PIC) shall be held no sooner than 30 days and no later than 45 days of the notice being mailed or hand delivered. The format of the PIC may be determined by the proponent however the date, time and location for the PIC shall be.agreed upon by the Municipality and the proponent. MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Page 5 8 -.20 SUBSECTION: DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PSD -D0008 APPROVED BY: Council SUBJECT: ANTENNA SYSTEMS DATE APPROVED: REVISED: November 25, 2002 July 2, 2013 At the Public Information Centre the proponent shall be responsible for displaying all the necessary drawings and pictures. Subsequent to the Public Information Centre the proponent shall provide to the Planning Services Department the following: • A record of names, addresses and telephone numbers of attendees; • Notes of the meeting which include issues and concerns that were raised by the public; and • A letter indicating how the proponent will address the concerns and issues raised by the public at the PIC. Staff from the Planning Services Department shall attend the Public Information Centre for observation purposes only. 4. Approvals a) Letter of Concurrence or Non - concurrence The Director of Planning Services will issue to Industry Canada, the proponent and Members of Clarington Council a Letter of Concurrence stating that the proponent has satisfactorily consulted with the Municipality. Such letter will be provided within 60 days from the date the application is submitted and deemed complete by the Planning Services Department (120 days where public consultation is required) or, in the case where a Letter of Undertaking is required, when a Letter of Undertaking has been completed to the Municipality's satisfaction. ii. If the Municipality of Clarington is not satisfied with the proposal, then the Director of Planning Services will issue a letter of non - concurrence to Industry Canada, the proponent and Members of Clarington.Council indicating the reasons why the Municipality is not satisfied with the proposed Antenna System. b) Letter of Undertaking Letter of Undertaking is required in situations where: • a new, non - excluded Antenna System is constructed; • a new equipment shelter is to be constructed on a roof -top; and • a new equipment shelter is to be constructed to accommodate co- location on an existing Antenna System. ii. When the Municipality of Clarington is satisfied with the site location, layout and design, the proponent will provide a Letter of Undertaking, in the Municipality's prescribed format, to address the following issues as they are applicable: • Site Plan and Landscaping drawings; • Building Permits; • Entrance Permits from the road authority; • Sign Permits from the Municipality of Clarington; • Security deposits for site works: MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 8 -21 PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Page 6 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Page 7 8 -22 C11-//1 & r� I Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 24, 2013 Resollul uon#: BY-11aw #: Repor W: PSD- 042 -13 M110e PLN 34.5.1. Subject: - DESiGNATED HER9TAGE PROPERTY M11NOR AL TERA IONS It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD- 042 -13 be received; 2. THAT the Director of Planning Services be authorized to approve minor alterations to designated heritage properties in consultation with the Clarington Heritage Committee, in accordance with Section 33(15) of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter 0.18; and 3. THAT the Ontario Heritage Trust, the Clarington Heritage Committee, and all interested parties listed in Report PSD- 042 -13 be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by KK/FL /av /df June 18, 2013 Dd id W. Crome, MCIP, RPP . Director of Planning Services Reviewed by: Jf Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 8 -23 REPORT O PSD-042-13 NAGS 1.1 Designated heritage property owners undertake necessary repairs, renovations and upgrades to preserve and enhance the heritage character of their buildings. In early 2013, Council approved seed funding for a heritage incentive grant program to assist designated property owners with the higher costs of keeping their structures historically accurate. Most applications are for structural repair, mortar replacement, maintenance of wood siding, etc; however some grants include alterations of relatively minor significance, with regard to the reasons. for heritage designation. 1.2 To streamline the process with regard to the heritage incentive grants and minor alterations, Council could delegate the responsibility for approval of these applications to the Director of Planning Services, who would consult with the Clarington Heritage Committee on minor alterations. KNEEN. 11 ILI T,LI ` O HF — R11 Ts,' E sCTI 2.1 The Ontario Heritage Act empowers a Municipality to pass a by -law designating a property to be of cultural heritage value or interest. 2.2 The Ontario Heritage Act stipulates that the owner of a property designated under Part IV cannot alter the property where such alteration is likely to affect the reasons for designation without the written consent of Council. Council is required to consider any application for alteration of a designated heritage property in consultation with its heritage committee. 2.3 Where a municipal heritage committee is established, Section 33(15) of the Ontario Heritage Act permits the delegation of the power to consent to alterations to an employee or official of the municipality. Section 33(16) directs that the scope of delegation of this power be defined as to whether it be applicable to all or certain alterations. 2.4 At their June 18th, 2013 meeting, the Clarington Heritage Committee (CHC) passed the following motion in support of the delegation of the .power to consent to minor alterations to the Director of Planning Services: "THAT Council delegate the power to authorize minor alterations to designated heritage properties to the Director of Planning Services in consultation with the Clarington Heritage Committee ". 3e STAFF COMMENTS 3.1 It is recommended that the power to consent to minor alterations for designated heritage properties be delegated to the Director of Planning Services in consultation with the Clarington Heritage Committee. This delegation of approval will ensure that there is no unnecessary delay for heritage property owners who wish to undertake projects of a minor nature in relationship to the features that have been designated. , REPORT N I J. P S D -04 - 1 J PAGE 4. CONCURREMC E — Not Applicable 5 CCLUSIOO J! 5.1 The Clarington Heritage Committee's function under the Ontario Heritage Act is to provide advice and assistance to Council on matters of heritage conservation. The CHC is in support of the delegation of power to consent to minor alterations to the Director of Planning Services for designated heritage properties. 5.2 Staff recommend Council approve delegation of power to consent to minor alterations to the Director of Planning Services who, for designated heritage properties will in consultation with the CHC, review the proposed alterations. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN The recommendations contained in this report conform to the general intent'of the following priorities of the Strategic Plan: Promoting economic development Maintaining financial stability Connecting Clarington Promoting green initiatives Investing in infrastructure X Showcasing our community Not in conformity with Strategic Plan Staff Contact: Kristy Kilbourne List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Clarington Heritage Committee Jim Leonard, Registrar, Ontario Heritage Trust Bert Duclos, Heritage Advisor, Ministry of Culture, Tourism, and Sport 8 -25 Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 24,2013 Resolution #: By ®law #: File #: PLN 38.7.3 OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW GTOWTH MANAGEMENT AND DRAFT LAND BUDGET N ii A �. It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD- 043 -13 be received; and 2. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD- 043 -13 be notified of Council's decision and advised that Report PSD- 043 -13 is available online at www.clarington.net /ourplan. Submitted b : Reviewed by: Y D i . Crome; MCIP, RPP Franklin Wu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer NG /COS /sn /df 18 June 2013 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 REPORT NO.: PSD-043-13 PAGE 2 Executive Summary Based on the requirements of the Growth Plan and the Regional Official Plan: • Clarington is required to plan for a 72% increase in urban population (additional 52,000 people), which is approximately 22,000 new residential units. • Clarington is required to plan for approximately 6,200 intensification units within the 2006 Built Boundary as defined by the Province between 2015 and 2031 • Even though the Municipality is required to Plan on this basis, the growth figures would appear to be optimistic based on previous experience • Based on Hemson's population and housing for Clarington and the analysis in this report, future growth will be distributed as follows: 0 Courtice 22% 0 Bowmanville 53% 0 Newcastle 21% 0 Orono/Rural 4% • Average annual population growth rates (rounded) through the five year intervals are as follows: 0 2006-2011 1400 0 2011-2016 1900 0 2016-2021 2500 0 2021-2026 2800 0 2026 -2031 3300 Designated Greenfield Areas • Designated Greenfield Areas are those lands designated for urban growth but not occupied as of June 2006. These include: 0 Lands in draft approved plans of subdivision 0 Lands in plans of subdivision under construction but not occupied as of June 2006 0 Lands where homes have been constructed since 2006 0 Land with a development proposal under consideration 0 Vacant lands currently farmed but inside the urban boundary • There are 13,500 new residential units in Greenfield Areas required to conform. These are to be distributed as follows: 0 Courtice - 2,400 0 Bowmanville - 8,000 0 Newcastle - 3,100 REPORT NO.: PSD-043-13 PAGE 3 • 47% of the required units to 2031 are already in the development pipeline (vacant lots, draft approved or proposed units total 9,306 for the Urban Areas). This is equal to approximately 10 years of supply. • Average annual growth rates (rounded) for new housing through the five year intervals are as follows: 0 2006-2011 600 0 2011-2016 750 0 2016-2021 1000 0 2021-2026 1100 0 2026-2031 1200 Intensification • Intensification units are any units constructed within the Built Boundary • The Provincial methodology for the Built Boundary has made Clarington's job easier as larger tracts of primarily vacant land were included in the Built Boundary, including lands on the west side of Lambs Road (Far Sight Investments and the Training School/Camp 30 lands), the Bowmanville waterfront, Courtice Town Centre) • Intensification Areas are to be identified to accommodate the majority of the intensification and include Town Centres, Regional Corridors, Waterfront Places and Transit Stations • Intensification units are proposed to be distributed between Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle on the same ratio as their share of population at 2031 but adjusted to account for the lack of intensification sites in Newcastle • Intensification units planned for each community are: 0 Courtice - 2100 0 Bowmanville - 3600 0 Newcastle - 500 Land Supply • The slower than projected growth since 1996 (30,000 fewer people), the higher densities that are now being implemented in Newcastle than planned for in the 1996 Official Plan and the requirements of the Growth Plan (32% of the future units between 2015 and 2031 being within the Built Boundary) results in minimal additional land supply required prior to 2031. • Urban Area unit growth from 2013-2031 was distributed on the basis of the Region's total household growth as follows: Urban Area Courtice Bowmanville Newcastle Total Built-up Area Units 2,055 3,602 524 6,181 Designated 2,643 7,763 3,056 13,462 Greenfield Units Total 4,698 11,365 3,580 19,643 REPORT PAGE 4 Summary The land budget process is only a mathematical basis for conformity to the Growth Plan. The important issue for Clarington is not about simply meeting these targets, but should focus on creating high quality urban design and community character. 1-1129VI REPORT NO.: PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 5 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The purpose of this report is to present a draft residential land budget analysis for Clarington's Urban Areas (Courtice, Sowmanville and Newcastle). The analysis in this report will form the basis for Clarington's Official Plan Amendment (OPA). This report examines the land capacity and demand in Clarington and evaluates if Clarington is able to meet the Provincial targets and Regional requirements. The OPA will contain phasing policies as part of the Municipality's Growth Management Strategy and must conform with the goals and objectives of the Province's Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2006) and the Region's Official Plan. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 Shaping the Future of Growth Municipalities across the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH) have seen significant planning challenges arise from the conventional suburban form of development, often referred to as "urban sprawl ". This traditional pattern of development has created many environmental, social, and economic problems and will continue to do so if traditional methods and attitudes do not shift towards a more compact and pedestrian oriented design. Some of the issues created by traditional suburban developments are listed below. There has been an increase in the number of automobiles travelling over longer distances which has resulted in clogged transportation corridors. This delays the movement of goods and services which costs Ontario upwards of $5 billion in lost GDP each year (source: Ministry of Infrastructure); Traffic. Gridlock on Highway 401 Source: Copyright Queen's Printer for Ontario, photo source: Ontario Growth Secretariat, Ministry of Infrastructure Traditional suburban development patterns require more infrastructure (road and water /waste water lines), which requires not only more upfront capital costs, but also more operational, maintenance and eventual replacement costs. According to a recent study, the upfront cost for infrastructure is about one third less for compact or smart growth developments. Additionally, infill developments often .use existing infrastructure, lowering upfront costs even more (subject to the capacity available); ® Urban sprawl contributes to the degradation of the natural environment, air quality and water resources, as well as consumption of agricultural lands and other natural resources, critical to the future economy and sustainability of our communities; 1 REPORT NO.: PS®- 043 -73 PAGE 6 Public square next to a downtown municipal building Source: Copyright Queen's Printer for Ontario, photo source: Ontario Growth Secretariat, Ministry of Infrastructure Traditional suburban development patterns can cost, on average, about 10% more for the ongoing delivery of public services such as police, ambulance, and fire service. This is because the configuration of a community greatly affects the delivery of service. Also, the success of public libraries or community centres depends largely on how connected they are to the residents in the area. Better neighbourhood connections lead to higher usage of community facilities; Attractive and efficient public transit is more costly and difficult to introduce into sprawling communities leading to increased operational and- user costs and reduced service levels; ® Traditional forms of commercial and residential development generate less tax revenue than more compact forms of development, such as mixed use developments. This is because traditional suburban form consumes large amounts of land and quickly exhausts the municipal's constrained land supply; Left: Commercial sprawl along an arterial road (Wellington St., Aurora). Right: pedestrian - oriented retail, live -work, and townhouse units (Lakeshore Rd., Port Credit Village, Mississauga) Source: Copyright Queen's Printer for Ontario, photo source: Ontario Growth Secretariat, Ministry of Infrastructure Suburban developments can appear homogenous and uninspiring. By incorporating more diversity and interest into streetscape designs this can maize it more attractive to both residents and other businesses; 8 ®31 REPORT NO.: PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 7 Design improvements to a hypothetical arterial road to make it more pedestrian, transit, and bicycle friendly Source: Copyright Queen's Printer for Ontario, photo source: Ontario Growth Secretariat, Ministry of Infrastructure ® Studies show that there is a statistical relationship between urban sprawl developments and human health and obesity. Urban design elements can be applied to increase physical activity for residents and create a more inviting and less institutionalized community (public parks instead of commercial gyms). Transportation systems that give priority to walking, cycling, and transit use and combinations of these modes also encourage physical activity and can improve a person's overall health. There is a strong need to improve our strategy for land use and development patterns in order to provide high quality infrastructure, public services and improve the environment. The Province of Ontario produced the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe in order to address some of the issues related to these historical development patterns. 2.2 Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2006) The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (the Growth Plan) was passed under the Places to Grow Act, 2005 and came into effect on June 16th, 2006. It is a 25- year plan that sets a new direction as to how municipalities will develop in the future. The Growth Plan needs to be read in conjunction with the Provincial Policy Statement (2005) and the Provincial Greenbelt Plan. In the event of conflict between the Provincial documents, the Growth Plan prevails, except where the policies of the other documents speak to the protection of the natural environment and human health. The policies that provide more protection to the natural environment and human health will prevail. 2.2.1 Goals and Key Concepts The Growth Plan aims to curb urban sprawl, revitalize downtowns, create complete communities, protect natural resources and increase housing and transportation choices by providing clear and specific policy direction. 8 -32 REPORT NO.: Psc -043 1: Pr:,rE The Growth Plan encourages intensification throughout the settlement areas in municipalities. Intensification refers to development or redevelopment of lands at a higher density than what currently exists, including infill development, brownfield development, and expansion or conversion of existing buildings. The Growth Plan directs upper -tier municipalities (such as Durham Region) to designate specific areas as the focus for intensification including Town Centres, Major Transit Stations, and Intensification Corridors. The Intensification Areas are to be the focus for higher density housing and employment. Within the Growth Plan, there are several primary themes which address the challenges that are facing the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH). These include: • Encourage the development of complete communities with a diverse mix of land uses, a range and mix of employment and housing types, high quality public open space and easy access to local stores and services in a development pattern that is compact in form; • Optimize existing and /or planned infrastructure (including roads, public transportation, water /waste water, community facilities, etc.) in a cost efficient manner. This can be done by directing growth to the Built -Up Areas where infrastructure may already be in place; • Revitalize downtowns by encouraging infill development; • Protect natural features and preserve agricultural lands; • Protect employment areas and plan for a balance of jobs and housing to reduce the need for long- distance commuting; • Promote, transit- supportive urban environments that reduce the dependence on the automobile. 2.2.2 Growth Plan The Built -Up Area is defined by the Growth Plan as the area inside the Built Boundary. The Built Boundary is the limit of the developed urban area as defined by the Province and reflects the built -up portion of an urban area as of June 2006. Designated Greenfield Areas are lands situated between the Urban Area Boundary and the Built Boundary. These lands have been designated for development but have not yet been built upon. They are mostly the undeveloped areas within the Urban Boundary. In Clarington, this area is predominately designated 'Future Urban Residential' in the Official Plan. To assist with the understanding of the terminology introduced by the Growth Plan, a glossary of terms has been provided in Attachment 1. ROWN REPORT NO.: PSD- 043-13 PAGE 9 Visualization of Built Boundary The following diagram illustrates the Region of Durham's Built -Up and Designated Greenfield Areas as conceptualized in the Growth Plan. / Urban Growth Centre 407 Expansion Agricultural and Rural Areas Greenbelt Area Designated Built Up Area Greenfield Area Ilp Urban Grovdth Centre I Drownfield/ Greyfield — Intensification Corridor Greenbdt Area (Ontario Regulation 59/05) and Dural Area Designated sSr -eerrt sell Area SuHt -up Area i I i Settlement Areas 8-34 REPORT O PSD-043-13 PAGE 10 2.2.3 Population and Employment Forecasts The Growth Plan has assigned growth forecasts for population and employment for each Regional Government and the City of Toronto in the Greater Golden Horseshoe area. Based on these forecasts, the Region of Durham is expected to grow to a total amount of 960,000 people and 350,000 jobs by 2031.. Through the Growing Durham Study, the Region determined which communities in the Region can accommodate this forecasted growth. The Region has used these forecasts for long range planning and managing future growth. Growth in the Region cannot exceed these allocated growth forecasts. 2.2.4 Accommodating Growth In addition to setting out the forecasts, the Growth Plan also provides direction as to how growth should be accommodated. Generally the Growth Plan seeps to shift traditional patterns of suburban development to more compact and denser urban forms all within existing Urban Boundaries. Three Growth Plan policies in particular, provide the direction in which growth must occur; At least 40% of annual residential development must be located within the Built -Up Areas of each upper -tier municipality by 2015 and each year thereafter. Designated Greenfield Areas must be developed at an average gross density of 50 people and jobs combined per hectare, measured across the geography of the upper -tier municipality. The area to which this density applies excludes lands constrained by environmental features. Ensure future jobs by protecting employment lands from conversion to non-. employment uses, such as residential. Rural Settlement areas are not considered to have any Greenfield Areas since they have not been assigned a Built Boundary by the Province. These areas have limited capacity for new development because they are not fully serviced. Although the Province has assigned a Built Boundary to-Orono, given the servicing constraints of the' area, the implementation of the Growth Plan Policies into Clarington's Official Plan will focus on the other three urban areas of Clarington (Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle). 2.2.5 Employment Areas Protection of employment lands while accommodating population growth is also a main priority in the Growth Plan. Employment policies in the Growth Plan ensure that there is an adequate supply of land available to meet the employment forecasts assigned in the Growth Plan. The employment forecasts are a combination of projected jobs to be created in employment lands and jobs driven by population growth (such as retail and schools). Municipalities must also ensure that the necessary infrastructure (such as water, waste water, and transit) is provided to support the future employment needs. REPORT t O O _ 043-13 PAG Under the Growth Plan, major retail commercial uses are generally not permitted in designated employment areas. This type of employment should be located closer to residential'areas to meet the resident's daily needs without having to travel long distances. 2.3 Durham Region Official Plan In keeping with the requirements of the Places to Grow Act, 2005, the Region of Durham amended their Official Plan to reflect the policies of the Growth Plan. The recent amendments represent the Region's interpretation of conformity with the Growth Plan as approved by the Ontario Municipal Board. As part of the update to Clarington's Official Plan, it is a requirement that the policies of the Clarington Official Plan are in conformity with the Growth Plan as well as the Durham Region Official Plan. 2.3.1 Regional Official Plan Amendment (ROPA) Process and Outcome In 2007 the Region of Durham undertook the "Growing Durham Study" to develop an approach to implement the Growth Plan. The process involved public,. municipal, and agency consultation that resulted in amendment number 128 to the Regional Official Plan, also referred to as ROPA 128. Regional Council adopted the amendment on June 3rd, 2009. The amendment was forwarded to the Province for final approval. A draft decision was issued by the Province on March 12, 2010, which included 113 modifications to the policies and schedules. On October 27, 2010 the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing issued their final. decision, however, the Region did not agree with this decision and appealed it to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) in November of that year. . Moreover, there were 32 individual appeals made to the OMB regarding the amendment. The Municipality of Clarington was one of the parties that appealed the Ministry's final decision. On January 9th, 2013, the OMB issued an order in accordance with a settlement reached between the Region, the Province of -Ontario and other key stakeholders. The approval represents a compromise of the various major appeals. The Regional Official Plan Amendment now has full approval and is in full force and effect. 2.3.2 Final Decision on Clarington Appeals The final decision regarding Clarington's appeals are as follows: • Approval of the "Living Area" expansion to the Courtice Urban Area; • Denial of the expansion to the Urban Area for the Courtice Employment lands; • Deferral of the expansion to the Orono Employment lands, until such time as it is considered further in accordance with Policy 3.4,4 of the Greenbelt Plan; • Refusal of the. Newcastle Urban Area expansion. Special Study Area 2 will remain as designated on June 2, 2009; • Approval of the Urban Area expansion for "Living Area" between Bowmanville and Newcastle, south of Highway 401 (Wilmot Creek Phase 8). mm REPORT NO.: PS©- 043 -13 IMAGE- 12 The map below shows the locations of the above decisions. t AGREEMENT ON MINISTER'S DECISION ROpA 128 e OCTOBER 2012 I } ' j Urban Area-Boundary Expansions Refusecl Special Study Area 2 Refused Non- Decisions Defer approval Refuse Remains I • r .�„ ;..,. ;•,..:.: Approval 2.3.3 Regional Official Plan (ROP) Forecasts The Regional Official Plan provides a policy framework, which allocates population and employment forecasts and sets specific density standards for development. The total growth for the Region as allocated by the Provincial Growth Plan is distributed among all lower -tier municipalities. As shown in Table 1 the Region has allocated a total growth of 21,895 households, 52,360 people, and 15,845 jobs for Clarington between 2011 and 2031. Ell REPORT NO.: PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 13 Table 1 m Population, Households and Employment Allocated to Clarington to 2031 Of the total household growth for Clarington, 6,181 units are to be built within the Built - Up Area for the time period between 2015 and 2031. 2.3.4 Key Concepts The Regional Official Plan has been strengthened in order to implement the Growth Plan. Some of the concepts concentrated on policies to: ® Create communities that are complete, healthy and sustainable; • Support active transportation; ® Support food security for all residents of the Region; and ® Protect employment lands. As directed by the Growth Plan, the Region as a whole shall accommodate a minimum of 40% of all new residential units within the Built -Up Areas. This will be calculated each year, starting in 2015. The Region has given Clarington a specific minimum intensification target of 32% of our total unit growth which will contribute to the Region's overall goal of 40 %. The remaining 8% was directed to other municipalities such as Whitby which has a minimum intensification target of 45 %. In terms of economic development policies, the Regional Official Plan has recognized the importance of key economic drivers that will influence the future growth and development of the Region, including the Clarington Energy Park, Clarington Technology Park and the Darlington Nuclear Facility expansion. These areas are to generate the majority of employment growth in Clarington for the next 20 years. 2.3.5 Intensification Areas To establish a complete, sustainable and compact urban system, the Region has developed an urban structure which includes: ® Regional Centres, ® Regional Corridors, Waterfront Places, and ® Transit Stations. MM 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 Growth % Change 2011 -2031 from 2011-2031 Urban 72,705 81,665 92,635 111,915 124,685 51,980 72% Population Rural 15,275 15,380 15,465 15,565 15,655 380 2% Population Total 87,950 97,045 108,100 127,480 140,340 52, y69 6®% Population Households 30,225 34,025 39,170 46,585 52,120 21,895 72% Employment 22,575 26,895 32,150 36,070 38,420 15,845 70% Of the total household growth for Clarington, 6,181 units are to be built within the Built - Up Area for the time period between 2015 and 2031. 2.3.4 Key Concepts The Regional Official Plan has been strengthened in order to implement the Growth Plan. Some of the concepts concentrated on policies to: ® Create communities that are complete, healthy and sustainable; • Support active transportation; ® Support food security for all residents of the Region; and ® Protect employment lands. As directed by the Growth Plan, the Region as a whole shall accommodate a minimum of 40% of all new residential units within the Built -Up Areas. This will be calculated each year, starting in 2015. The Region has given Clarington a specific minimum intensification target of 32% of our total unit growth which will contribute to the Region's overall goal of 40 %. The remaining 8% was directed to other municipalities such as Whitby which has a minimum intensification target of 45 %. In terms of economic development policies, the Regional Official Plan has recognized the importance of key economic drivers that will influence the future growth and development of the Region, including the Clarington Energy Park, Clarington Technology Park and the Darlington Nuclear Facility expansion. These areas are to generate the majority of employment growth in Clarington for the next 20 years. 2.3.5 Intensification Areas To establish a complete, sustainable and compact urban system, the Region has developed an urban structure which includes: ® Regional Centres, ® Regional Corridors, Waterfront Places, and ® Transit Stations. MM REPORT NO.: PSD-043-13 PAGE 14 In addition, the Regional Plan directs higher densities to these areas. Refer to Attachment 2 for detailed maps delineating these areas as well as the Built -Up Area and Designated Greenfield Area in Courtice, Bowmanville, Newcastle and Orono. It should be noted that in Clarington, centres, corridors; waterfront places and transit stations can be located within the Built Boundary and the Designated Greenfield Areas. However, development within the Designated Greenfield Areas does not count towards our "Intensification Target ". Regional Centres, such as the Bowmanville West Town Centre, are to develop at a density of 75 units per gross hectare, at full build out. They are to contain a full array of institutional, commercial, major retail, residential, recreational, cultural, and office uses. The housing units should be a mix of mostly high -rise and some mid -rise developments. Regional Corridors, (i.e. Durham Highway 2 through Courtice) are to be developed as high density, mixed use areas that support high order transit. As a corridor, it should achieve a density of 60 units per gross hectare. Waterfront places shall be developed as focal points along Lake Ontario providing for a mix of uses integrated with the Greenlands system designation. The density target for this area is 60 units per gross hectare. Transit will be planned at locations with a range of uses concentrated around higher order transit hubs such as GO rail stations. The extent of the boundaries and land use designations are to be detailed in area municipal official plans. The density for this area is 120 units per gross hectare. A more detailed description of the urban structure components of the Regional Official Plan as well as the standards and densities are detailed in Attachment 3. Centre and Corridor policies shall provide for higher density development, while at the same time protect the integrity of historic downtowns. To integrate intensification, phasing policies will be developed to guide a smooth transition. 2.3.6 Secondary Plan Policies and Phasing Another key direction of the Regional Official Plan is the ability to manage growth through Secondary Plans. Development of Greenfield Areas that are greater than approximately 20 hectares shall only proceed in accordance with an approved Secondary Plan. Development of Living Areas or Employment Areas that are less than 20 hectares, may only proceed in the absence of a Secondary Plan, if the municipality is satisfied that the watershed components have been addressed through studies and that other conditions are satisfied. Such conditions include servicing, orderly development, transportation needs, land use compatibility, protection of natural features, variety of housing needs and mix of uses, and provision of public open spaces. The Regional Official Plan establishes the minimum requirements for the preparation of a Secondary Plan including: a watershed plan, plans for full municipal services, and analysis of key natural heritage features. REPORT NO.:, PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 15 Given that Clarington has three shoreline urban areas, development can occur simultaneously in Courtice, Bowmanville, and Newcastle. Clarington will also have to develop more detailed phasing policies to guide the Secondary Planning process, including the consideration of the amount of available land, infrastructure and public facilities over a minimum of 5 years. Secondary Plan Areas shall be substantially developed to their planned capacity (generally 75% of the residential land area) prior to the approval of development in adjacent Secondary Plan Areas. 2.3.7 Employment Land Policies There is a strong need to create and maintain a balanced relationship between residents and jobs for each local municipality. The Regional Official Plan employment forecasts allocated to each local municipality need to, be accomplished in order for the Region to achieve its Growth Plan employment target. The-Region has allocated 38,420 jobs to Clarington, a growth of approximately 15,854 from 2011 to 2031. Out of the 15,854 growth in jobs, the number of jobs to be created in designated employment lands is approximately 7,736. The balance of the jobs are considered population related jobs and are to be created in other areas of the Municipality, mainly in schools,, commercial retail, and offices. Municipalities must ensure at least 50% of the total forecasted employment growth occurs within designated Employment Areas. 2.4 Clarington Official Plan Reviews The Municipality has.been undertaking a comprehensive Official Plan Review. coincidently with the Region's conformity to the Growth Plan. As part of the Plan review, a series of discussion papers have been prepared to form the basis of the land budget analysis. These papers have been released to the public and public information sessions have been held throughout the community. Relevant papers on growth management include: Forecast and Employment Projections, Hemson Consulting The Forecast and Employment Projections Report was released in March 2010 and then later updated in January 2013 to reflect the 2011 Census data release. These outcomes will be discussed in the land budget analysis section of this report. Economic Ease and Employment Lands Discussion Paper The Economic Base and Employment Lands Discussion Paper was released in July 2010. Conclusions from this paper include: • Clarington has a sufficient employment land supply to accommodate forecasted employment growth to 2031, however the lack of servicing will limit growth potential; • Less than 10% of the vacant employment lands in Clarington are serviced; • Clarington's economic development and investment attraction efforts are being hampered by a low supply of serviced vacant employment lands. 1 REPORT MO.: PSD-043-13 PAGE IM Intensification Discussion Paper This Intensification Discussion Paper was released in September 2011 and deals with the impacts of intensification policies and how to properly plan and manage the orderly growth within Intensification Areas. The Regional Official Plan identifies a basic urban structure for Intensification Areas comprising of designated Centres and Corridors. The suggested strategy to accommodate intensification is as follows: • Establish general OP policies; • Identify specific intensification priority areas (phasing strategy); and • Implement an action plan. Some key priorities for Clarington are also discussed in the repot: • Address servicing constraints along Durham Highway 2, within the Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan; • Support historical downtown Bowmanville by reducing surface parking and creating multilevel parking structures freeing up valuable land for infill development and promoting residential uses downtown to support the local commercial districts; and • Protect Newcastle Village Centre by maintaining the area's existing scale, form and function. Intensification shall be directed mainly to the key growth areas (Centres, Corridors, Waterfront Places and Transit Stations). These places offer the best potential for transforming neighbourhoods within Clarington. Intensification can also take the form of infill in already established neighbourhoods but on a limited scale and only where it is complementary to the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. The policies in the Official Plan Amendment should encourage infill in Intensification Areas but also recognize that neighbourhoods are stable, but not static. A general policy should be developed to articulate how the Municipality will make infrastructure investments to support intensification. Transportation policies will need to be modified to also include connections between Intensification Areas using active transportation and transit. Growth Management Discussion Paper The Growth Management Discussion ,Paper was released in May 2012 and explores how and where Clarington should continue to grow. It examines historical growth patterns, current development plans, infill and intensification opportunities as well as infrastructure opportunities and constraints. This Discussion Paper provides three growth scenarios for Clarington: 1. Current Trend, Scenario 9: This scenario presents a continuation of the current growth pattern with respect to location, density and mix of uses. As this scenario does not meet the new policy framework it only provides a base to compare the other'two scenarios. This scenario assumes a 16% Municipal -wide intensification 8-41 rate (the historic rate between 2001 and 2006) with development spread across REPORT NO.: PSD-043-13 PAGE 17 vacant sites throughout the three main urban areas, with no concentration of higher densities within centres or corridors. Scenario 1 results in a need for 807 gross hectares of Greenfield land and 6 gross hectares of land within the Built Boundary. 2, Growing Durham, Scenario 2: This scenario uses the Region's growth management strategy, Growing Durham, as the foundation for density and intensification targets. This scenario incorporates the Regional densities for centres, corridors and waterfront places. The intensification rate is 32% (6,181 units) across the three urban areas. However, these densities are unrealistic for Clarington. This scenario does not present a detailed land need analysis for Clarington as it was a Regional wide exercise. It was anticipated that local municipalities would undertake a more detailed. analysis of the densities which better suited the local character. . 3. Reinforcing Communities and Retaining Local Character, Scenario 3: This Scenario is more reflective of the local character and nuances in Clarington. More specifically it represents the three urban areas and the qualities that make each of them unique. While Growing Durham is the starting point for establishing the urban structure and targets, consideration is also needed for these centres and corridors to offer the best potential for transforming neighbourhoods within Clarington into more vibrant, mixed use, pedestrian- oriented and transit supportive areas. Using an average density for Greenfield Areas of 19 units per gross hectare (upgh) and 70 upgh for Built -Up Areas, this Scenario results in a need of 480 gross hectares of Greenfield land and 50 gross hectares of Intensification lands, for a combined total of 530 gross hectares. Planning Services is proposing a modified version of Scenario 3 for the Comprehensive Official Plan Review which incorporates recent Census data (2011) and more modest changes to gross densities in Greenfield and Built -up Areas. 3.1 Methodology. The Growth Plan policies, in conjunction with the Region's forecast and intensification target allocations, are used for Clarington's land budget analysis. This land budget analysis is based on information as of January 1, 2013 and includes updated census data. It examines the amount of land required to accommodate the forecasted population and the population - related employment growth.'This background assessment will then be used as a basis for an amendment to Clarington's Official Plan which will be presented to the public and Council this year. Residential development is limited in rural areas and Orono. Although the Provincial Growth Plan recognizes Orono as an urban area, it is not included in the land budget analysis because of the significant servicing constraints of the area. As a result, this land budget analysis focuses on Clarington's three main urban areas: Courtice, Bowmanville, and Newcastle. REPORT NO.: PSD-043-13 PAGE 18 It is also important to clarify that this land budget analysis is not intended to identify specific development potential for specific sites but instead identify that development potential will be defined through the development review process. Even though this report establishes average densities for the unit calculations, the average densities will vary on a site by site basis. The Provincial Government has not developed a methodology for land budgets under the Grown Plan. This has resulted in various land budget approaches used by regional and municipal governments. OMB decisions have also added confusion to the way new land budget methodologies are conducted because of the different approaches that can be used. Rather than setting targets for Clarington's urban areas, the upcoming Official Plan Amendment-will propose a phasing strategy based on this land budget analysis and will allow market flexibility to adjust to high densities and intensification given Clarington's character. This flexibility is important since higher densities can only take place with the corresponding provision of services such as water and transit. Moreover, the amount of residential development contemplated in the Region's forecasts for Clarington will only be met when accompanied by job creation and the provision of services. Currently 90% of Clarington's employment lands are not serviced. The analysis of the land budget for Clarington is based on a comprehensive supply /demand approach for residential growth which is comprised of three steps: 1. Residential Land Supply: Is determined by the number of residential units that are committed (draft approved or registered vacant) and proposed in current subdivision applications plus the inventory of vacant developable residential land (uncommitted lands) in each urban area. This land supply is then classified into two groups: Built - Up-Area and Greenfield Area. To calculate the amount of vacant developable land, the environmental protection areas, as illustrated in the schedules of the recent Natural Heritage System Discussion Paper are excluded. The capacity of the uncommitted vacant land, as well as the timing of when the lands expect to be developed, were conducted to.determine the maximum number of units by 2031. The- densities were calculated based on the Growth Plan's minimum density of 50 people and jobs per gross hectare and the Regional Official Plan allocated densities for Centres, Corridors, Waterfront Places and Transit Stations. By analyzing the total land area and units in the Greenfield and Built -Up Areas for all three Urban Areas we were able to calculate an overall average density of 16 upgh for Designated Greenfield lands (Greenfield density) and 30 upgh for lands within the Built -Up Areas. 2. Residential Demand: The second step involves determining the land requirements to accommodate growth, which will be based on population and unit projections over the planning period from 2011 to 2031 by urban area. This information is based on a combination of the forecasted growth by Hemson and the Region. The average density assumptions are then applied to determine the amount of land required to meet the housing unit forecast in the Built -Up Area and Designated Greenfield Areas. _r REPORT NO.: PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 19 3. Land Needs: The last step compares the total supply of residential units and land area available minus the total demand for Clarington over the next 18 years. The results indicate whether Clarington's urban areas have a sufficient amount of land to accommodate the forecasted growth within the Built -up Area and the Designated Greenfield Areas. This analysis is also carried out for each of the urban areas and adjustments are made based on land supply factors. 3.2 Residential Land Supply 3.2.1 Committed and Proposed Units The supply of committed residential units (registered vacant, draft approved, and proposed) is monitored on an ongoing basis to ensure Clarington has a minimum three year supply of residential units in progress. The inventory of residential units in a plan of subdivision is monitored and updated every six months by the Planning Services Department. The average number of building permits issued for residential units over the past ten years is tracked by the Building Department. This average is based on the monthly information reported to Council by the Building Department. The past ten year average for Clarington is 704 units.per year. Another key policy is that municipalities shall maintain a residential land supply for a minimum of 10 years on lands designated and available for residential development. Municipalities shall also ensure that the residential unit supply within draft approved and registered plans of subdivision provide for a minimum supply of 3 years. Based on the inventory of committed and proposed residential units and the past ten year average, Clarington as a whole would have a supply of units that would last 13 years based on the current trend. However, the actual supply changes as we look closer at each urban area and future forecasts. As illustrated in Table 2, Courtice has a six year supply, Bowmanville has 15 years, and Newcastle has 19 years, while the supply for the Orono /rural areas is only three years. However, there is a limited supply of land and this trend will not apply in the future given the new policies of the Growth Plan. Table 2 e Current Supply of Committed and Proposed Units as of December 31St, 2012 8 -44. Courtice Bowmanville Newcastle Orono /Rural Clarington Draft Approved 677 4138 1711 54 6580 Registered Vacant lots /blocks 103 207 81 40 431 Proposed 385 1439 566 26 2416 Total 1165 5784 2358 120 9427 10 yr average 174 376 120 34 704 Years of supply 6 1 15 19 1 3 13 Years of Supply Using Hemson Forecast 5 11 13 3 10 8 -44. REPORT RIO.: PSD- 043 ®13 PAGE 20 Another method is to look at the years of supply based on Hemson's forecasted units instead of the past 10 year average. Below is a chart which shows the comparison. By using Hemson's forecasted units, Clarington is expected to issue about 1,000 units per year on average, which decreases the years of supply. Years of Supply for Committed and Proposed Units �+."'w'� •'�, � - - v.?�..�__z- :�s.�> -ate. - v #: -.'s ......Mss_ �xw_ar.__��.. -..�- — _ - -__� 11 r' G ^dr_' l S t l Oroi RLIrLlI C.Islrlrlp,toll ;1 2013 2015 2.017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 ❑ Buwd on 10 yedr werzige n Bds d on Unit foreu� isl 3.2.2 Uncommitted Units (Based on Vacant Land Inventory) An analysis was undertaken to determine the supply of vacant and potential developable residential land available within each neighbourhood. Once the land supply inventory was completed, a thorough analysis of the Natural Heritage Systems in these areas was carried out. As. mentioned before, the layers that create the Natural Heritage Systems (proposed Environmental Protection Areas) of these lands was excluded from the calculations of land inventory. Refer to the Natural Heritage System Discussion Paper for the methodology to define the proposed Environmental Protection areas of Clarington. The result is referred to as the "Total Residential Designated Land ". In order to determine the realistic amount of land that could be available for development, a neighbourhood by neighbourhood analysis was conducted which reduced the amount of available area for development if there were constraining elements such as: • Multiple large lots with existing dwelling units; • Size and configuration of the lots; and • Whether lands were fragmented by proposed Environmental Protection areas which would be difficult to access. . Assumed a normal market vacancy (eg. Owners not willing to explore development). REPORT NO.: PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 21 After analyzing the land area available for development based on these constraints, we arrived at the "Gross Developable Area ". It is at this stage that the average densities are applied to determine future capacity. Overall the Municipality has approximately 130 and 535 hectares of Gross Developable Land within the Built -Up Area and Greenfield Area, respectively. Table 3 summarizes the land supply in Clarington both within the Built -up Area and in the Designated Greenfield Area. Table 3 e Current Land Supply Available in Clarington for Uncommitted Knits An additional "take -out" of land could be made to arrive at a "Net Developable Area." This is the actual amount of land to be used for residential development (buildings, parking) after. subtracting 50% of the land which will be dedicated to roads, schools, parks, and commercial development. For the purposes of this land budget analysis, the land densities have been calculated at the "Gross Developable Area" since there is greater variability when calculating at the "Net Developable Area ". 3.3 Residential Demand This section explains the growth forecasted by population and unit projections for each of the Urban Areas to 2031. Consideration is also given to the intensification target to be accommodated within the Built -Up Areas of Clarington. The analysis is based on the forecasted growth completed by Hemson as well as the Region's allocations in the Regional Official flan. This is a top down analysis for the distribution of units. 3.3.1 Hemson Population and Unit Forecasts Hemson's forecast reflects the changes in population, household size and housing unit data collected from the 2011 Census information. The report finds that Clarington's population has grown steadily over the last 10 years and will continue to grow at around the same rate to 2031 (see Attachment 2 for the Hemson Report). Table 4 indicates that Clarington will grow by 52,700 people from 2011 to 2031, similar to the Region's forecast. Hemson's forecast shows that Newcastle will grow at a faster rate than Courtice and Bowmanville. Total EP Residential Gross Total Land Land Designated Developable Area (ha) (ha) Land Area Area (ha) ha Built-Up Area land supply 274 84 190 130 Designated Greenfield 1,005 278 727 535 Area land supply Total land supply 1,279 362 917 665 An additional "take -out" of land could be made to arrive at a "Net Developable Area." This is the actual amount of land to be used for residential development (buildings, parking) after. subtracting 50% of the land which will be dedicated to roads, schools, parks, and commercial development. For the purposes of this land budget analysis, the land densities have been calculated at the "Gross Developable Area" since there is greater variability when calculating at the "Net Developable Area ". 3.3 Residential Demand This section explains the growth forecasted by population and unit projections for each of the Urban Areas to 2031. Consideration is also given to the intensification target to be accommodated within the Built -Up Areas of Clarington. The analysis is based on the forecasted growth completed by Hemson as well as the Region's allocations in the Regional Official flan. This is a top down analysis for the distribution of units. 3.3.1 Hemson Population and Unit Forecasts Hemson's forecast reflects the changes in population, household size and housing unit data collected from the 2011 Census information. The report finds that Clarington's population has grown steadily over the last 10 years and will continue to grow at around the same rate to 2031 (see Attachment 2 for the Hemson Report). Table 4 indicates that Clarington will grow by 52,700 people from 2011 to 2031, similar to the Region's forecast. Hemson's forecast shows that Newcastle will grow at a faster rate than Courtice and Bowmanville. REPORT NO.: PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 22 Table 4 - Hemson Population Forecast for Clarington from 2011 to 2031 2011+ 24,900 36,100 8,300 a 6 1 ill 18,400 11`c J 87,700 2031 36,600 64,200 19,300 20,300 140,400 Growth 2011 -2031 11,700 28,100 11,000 1,900 52,700 Growth 2011- 47% 78% 132% 10% 60% +Based on 2011 Census data Population is total population including Census net under - coverage (Source: Hemson Consulting Inc.& Census Canada) Hemson's dwelling unit forecast is based on past Census data trends. The number of forecasted households is determined by flaking the total forecasted population and dividing it by the expected future average household size. It should be noted that longer planning time frames can often result in greater market uncertainty and timing risks. Table 5 indicates that in 2011 Clarington's housing stock consisted of 29,940 units and is expected to grow to 49,880 units by 2031, an increase of 19,940 units. The distribution of Clarington housing units to each urban area is shown below. Table 5 - Hemson Household Unit Forecast for Clarington to 2031 3.3.2 Comparison Between the Regional Forecasts and Hemson Forecasts The total housing units predicted by Hemson's forecasts are slightly lower than what the Region has allocated to Clarington. The Region expects Clarington to grow by an additional 21,895 units by 2031, compared to the Hemson forecast of 19,940 units, a difference of 1,955 units. One of the main reasons for the difference is that Hemson's forecast is based on recent 2011 Census information while the Region's forecast was sourced from the 2001 Census information. Moreover, the Region does not provide a breakdown of the distribution of households by urban area within Clarington, whereas Hemson does. There is also a difference between the Region and Hemson's forecasts for the rural area. As part of the Countryside Discussion Paper, currently being prepared by the Planning Services Department, an analysis of the projections and capacity for additional units within the rural hamlets and areas, will be presented. Household composition is a very important factor affecting demand for housing units. In general, a high percentage of the population is aging and family structures are mm 0 0 } ; o o 0 2,830 6,580 29,940 2011 8,020 12,510 2031 12,200 23,380 6,810 7,490 49,880 Growth 2011- 4,180 10,870 3,980 910 19,940 2031 52% 87% 140% 14% 67% Avg. Person Per Unit (PPU) at 2031 3.0 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.8 3.3.2 Comparison Between the Regional Forecasts and Hemson Forecasts The total housing units predicted by Hemson's forecasts are slightly lower than what the Region has allocated to Clarington. The Region expects Clarington to grow by an additional 21,895 units by 2031, compared to the Hemson forecast of 19,940 units, a difference of 1,955 units. One of the main reasons for the difference is that Hemson's forecast is based on recent 2011 Census information while the Region's forecast was sourced from the 2001 Census information. Moreover, the Region does not provide a breakdown of the distribution of households by urban area within Clarington, whereas Hemson does. There is also a difference between the Region and Hemson's forecasts for the rural area. As part of the Countryside Discussion Paper, currently being prepared by the Planning Services Department, an analysis of the projections and capacity for additional units within the rural hamlets and areas, will be presented. Household composition is a very important factor affecting demand for housing units. In general, a high percentage of the population is aging and family structures are mm REPORT NO.: PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 23 changing. Current trends in Ontario indicate a decrease in the average number of people per unit (ppu). The decrease in the average household size in Ontario is somewhat offset in Clarington because there is a greater in- migration of young families. Clarington is more attractive to younger families because of the relatively large housing supply, affordability, and its proximity to Toronto. Due to this factor, Clarington has a higher ppu than the Region's average. The population forecast from Hemson and the Region are relatively the same, the difference is in the number of units. However, the Region's forecast is a legislated forecast, therefore, to conform to the Regional Official Plan the land supply analysis will use the overall forecast as set by the Regional Official Plan. Hemson's forecast will be used to determine the land supply by urban area. Forecasted Unit Demand Before determining the unit forecast, it is necessary to devise a method which redistributes the difference in units between Hemson's and the Region's forecast of 1,955 units and the intensification target of 6,181 units among Clarington's urban areas. Staff's approach is to distribute these units based on the total share of population as of 2031 for each urban area given in Hemson's Community Forecast for Clarington. This is shown in Table 6. Based on this approach Bowmanville will receive 53.5% of both additional units and intensification target units. This approach is in keeping with the Official Plan which states that Bowmanville is the predominant urban centre. This method will be used for any other adjustments of units /land through the Official Plan Review process. Table 6 — Population Shares Based on Hemson Forecast and Distribution of Units To ensure data consistency with the December 2012 committed and proposed units, another step in determining the forecasted unit demand is required to account for the 1,399 units built between January 2011 and December 2012. This step determines the demand of housing units in the Designated Greenfield and Built -Up Areas in each of the three communities, after taking out the units already built between 2011 and 2012. This will result in the total number of units Clarington is expected to grow by from 2013 to 2031, which is 20,496 units. Table 7 illustrates the unit allocation to each urban area. L-IM-1i REPORT NO.: PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 24 Table 7 — Unit Allocation by Urban Area 2013 -2031 "Based on Table 6 + +from Building Division's Annual Permit Report ++ + does not account for rural units 3.4 sand Budget for Intensification Areas The Regional Official Plan has set an intensification target of 6,181 units between 2015 and 2031. The current supply of committed (registered vacant, draft approved) and proposed units includes a number of projects within the Built Boundary. The committed and proposed units within the Built -Up Areas of Clarington stands at 3,039, which leaves 3,142 uncommitted units to plan for in order to achieve the intensification target. See Table 8. The land supply for the Built -Up Area does not include any future grayfield /brownfield redevelopment or secondary units. As a result, provided that the transit, regional and municipal infrastructure, and soft services (e.g. seniors centres, libraries) are available, the Municipality will likely exceed its intensification target if the Built -Up Areas are built at higher densities. Based on the neighbourhood by neighbourhood analysis and the densities of past subdivision applications, staff has applied an average density of 30 upgh for Built -Up Areas. This density is equivalent to about 66 people per gross hectare (using Hemson's 2.2 ppu for medium and high density households in 2031). Of the 6,181 Intensification units, there are 3,142 remaining units that need to be accommodated on vacant lands. Using a density of 30 upgh, Clarington would need 105 ha to accommodate our intensification target (refer to Table 8 below). Since the available land supply is approximately 130 ha, we would still have about 25 ha of surplus land within the Built Boundary in Clarington. Table 8 — Gross Area Required for Clarington's Intensification Units (2015 -2031) Intensification Units Required (2015-2031) 6,181 Committed and proposed Units within the Built -Up Area Hemson forecast units 2011 -2031 - _ 4,180 -- 10,870 - - - -=- = 3,980 910 - 19,940 Additional Allocation 1,955 units from 595 1,045 315 0 1,955 Region¢ Total Unit Allocation 2011 -2031 4,775 11,915 4,295 910 ' 21,895 Units built in 2011 & 2012 ++ 488 650 204 57 1,399 Remaining Unit Growth 2013 -2031 4,287 11,265 4,091 853 20,496 Targeted Intensification Allocation 3,30 4 993 0 6,181 Units, 2015 -2031¢ Greenfield Allocation Units, 2013 -2031 2,403 7,961 3,098 0 13,4162{ `+ "Based on Table 6 + +from Building Division's Annual Permit Report ++ + does not account for rural units 3.4 sand Budget for Intensification Areas The Regional Official Plan has set an intensification target of 6,181 units between 2015 and 2031. The current supply of committed (registered vacant, draft approved) and proposed units includes a number of projects within the Built Boundary. The committed and proposed units within the Built -Up Areas of Clarington stands at 3,039, which leaves 3,142 uncommitted units to plan for in order to achieve the intensification target. See Table 8. The land supply for the Built -Up Area does not include any future grayfield /brownfield redevelopment or secondary units. As a result, provided that the transit, regional and municipal infrastructure, and soft services (e.g. seniors centres, libraries) are available, the Municipality will likely exceed its intensification target if the Built -Up Areas are built at higher densities. Based on the neighbourhood by neighbourhood analysis and the densities of past subdivision applications, staff has applied an average density of 30 upgh for Built -Up Areas. This density is equivalent to about 66 people per gross hectare (using Hemson's 2.2 ppu for medium and high density households in 2031). Of the 6,181 Intensification units, there are 3,142 remaining units that need to be accommodated on vacant lands. Using a density of 30 upgh, Clarington would need 105 ha to accommodate our intensification target (refer to Table 8 below). Since the available land supply is approximately 130 ha, we would still have about 25 ha of surplus land within the Built Boundary in Clarington. Table 8 — Gross Area Required for Clarington's Intensification Units (2015 -2031) Intensification Units Required (2015-2031) 6,181 Committed and proposed Units within the Built -Up Area 3,039 Draft approved, vacant registered, proposed) Remaining Intensification Units 3,142 Gross Area Required 30 upgh) 105 ha Land Supply 130. ha Surplus 25 ha REPORT NO.: GAS®- 043 -1 3 PAGE 25 However, the land supply picture for the Built -Up Areas changes when the analysis is carried out by urban area as shown in Table 9. Bowmanville has the largest amount of committed and proposed intensification units within the Built Boundary, close to 73% of its allocation, while Courtice only has 14 %. The analysis also demonstrates that Courtice and Bowmanville have surplus land to accommodate the targeted intensification units. Moreover, the supply - demand analysis shows that Newcastle does not have enough land to accommodate its allocation of uncommitted Intensification units; Newcastle can only accommodate about 150 more units within the Built Boundary. However Court-ice and Bowmanville have an excess supply of lands within the Built Boundary. If Clarington adjusts the remaining intensification units that need to be accommodated in Newcastle to Courtice and Bowmanville, we will be able to achieve the intensification target for Clarington as a whole. To protect the character of Newcastle and given the lack of available sites, the intensification unit allocation has been reduced for Newcastle and reallocated to Bowmanville and Courtice based on the method of share of total population as explained in Table 6. By adjusting Newcastle's Intensification units, Courtice will still have an excess supply of 18 hectares and Bowmanville will have an excess supply of 7 hectares. Overall, Clarington will possess an excess supply of 25 hectares within the Built Boundary. Table 9 reflects these calculations. Table 9 — Land Budget to Meet Intensification Intensification Allocation units, 2015 -2031 1,854 3,304 993 6,181 Total Committed and Proposed Units within 260 2,405 374 3,039 the Built Boundary Total Units Remaining 1,624 899 619 3,142 Land required (Density as per analysis 30 54 30 21 105 upgh ) Cross developable land available 78 47 5 130 Surplus /deficit land within the Built Boundary 24 17 d6 Redistribution of Newcastle Intensification 171 208 A769 Units Revised Remaining Units to be located within 1,795 1,197 1ii0 the Built Boundary Land area required to accommodate 60 40 5 105 remaining units (Density as per analysis 30 upgh ) Gross developable land available 78 47 5 130 Surplus land within the Built Boundary . 18 7 0 25 Another factor to consider is that between 2013 and 2014 some units will be built within the built boundary but will not count towards the intensification target of 6,181 units. Last year (2012), a total of 78 units were built within the Built Boundary. If multiplied over the next two years, Clarington will have 156 units that will be built by 2015. 156 units translates to about 5 ha of land that will be taken up by 2015, which will leave about 20 ha of excess land beyond 2031. 8 °50 REPORT NO.: PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 26 3.5 Land Area Budget for Designated Greenfield Areas From the previous table (Table 7), the total remaining units to be accommodated in Greenfield Areas is 13,462, between 2013 and 2031. Table 10 below, shows that after subtracting the committed and proposed units Clarington requires about 450 ha of land to accommodate the remaining 7,195 Greenfield units for the next 18 years. i ame I e Land rsudciet for uiarinciton's (ireentiew units (zui;j -zU;37 Greenfield Units Required (20132031) 13,462 Committed and Proposed Greenfield Units 6,267 (Draft approved, vacant registered, proposed) Remaining Greenfield Units 7,195 Cross Area Required (16 upgh) 450 ha Land Supply 535 ha Surplus 85 ha The average density of 16 upgh for Greenfield Areas is in keeping with the Growth Plan target of 50 people and jobs combined per gross hectare. Using Hemson's average of 2.7 people per unit, there would be 43 people per gross ha and 7 population related employment jobs. There are primarily two forms of population related employment, individuals that the work at home and commercial employment that grows in proportion with residential population growth. - To illustrate the concept of densities, the following are images of compact suburban development patterns which the Growth Plan is striving to achieve in Designated Greenfield Areas. Examples of compact, pedestrian oriented homes Source: Copyright Queen's Printer for Ontario, photo source: Ontario Growth Secretariat, Ministry of Infrastructure Table 11 below shows the land supply by Urban Area for Designated Greenfield Areas. Bowmanville has the largest amount of committed and proposed units at 3,379, while Courtice only has 904 units. The analysis also demonstrates that Courtice has the greatest surplus of land for additional Greenfield units. 8 °51 REPORT NO.: PSD -04313 PAGE 27 I able I I— Land Needs for (ireenTlela Areas py urpan Area Greenfield Allocation Units 2,403 7,961 3,098 13,462 Total Committed and Proposed Greenfield 904 3,379 1,984 6,267 Units 2.5 1.6 0.0 4.1 Total Remaining Greenfield Units 1,499 4,582 1,114 7,195 Land required (Density as per analysis 16 94 286 70 450 upgh ) 2.4 29.6 4.8 0.0 Gross useable developable land available 194 274 67 535 Surplus /deficit land for Greenfield 100 -12 -3 85 Development Redistribution of Bowmanville and 240 -198 -42 Newcastle Greenfield Units Revised Remaining Greenfield Units 1,739 4,384 1,072 7,19:1 Land required (Density as per analysis 16 109 274 67 450 upgh ) Gross developable land available 194 274 67 535 Surplus land for Greenfield 85 0 0 85 Bowmanville and Newcastle have a slight shortfall of Greenfield land to accommodate the expected growth which means some of the forecasted growth will need to be adjusted and directed to Courtice, which has 100 ha of excess supply of Greenfield land available. After these adjustments have been made, Courtice will have an excess land supply of 85 ha. 3.6 Commercial Land Needs It is also necessary to have an understanding of the need for commercial lands since commercial development is an integral component of residential development. As part of the Official Plan Review, the Municipality asked UrbanMetrics to undertake a Commercial Market Update to determine the amount of land required to accommodate commercial uses to 2031. Based on the chart below, Clarington only requires an additional 36.8 ha of commercial land to 2031. The need for more commercial lands will not be required until 2021, at which time the five year review of the Official Plan can address where the new commercial lands should be located. Courtice will be well served for commercial lands for the next few years. Meanwhile, allocating new commercial lands will be needed in Bowmanville and Newcastle. Some of the commercial development needs will be accommodated through the designation of new neighbourhood centres in the proposed secondary plan areas. Table 12 - Additional land area required for Commercial Uses 2016 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2021 0.0 2.5 1.6 0.0 4.1 2026 0.0 16.3 3.2 0.0 19.5 2031 2.4 29.6 4.8 0.0 36.8 Source: Commercial Market Analysis Update, Municipality of Clarington: Completed by UrbanMetrics Inc. 8 -52 REPORT NO.: PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 23 Although no new commercial lands are required within the next few years, there are geographical and market dynamics that need to be taken into account. From a geographical perspective Newcastle, has very little designated commercial land available for new businesses. From a local market perspective, even though Clarington's urban areas seem to be well served, small professional businesses continue to express difficulty in finding suitable sites in which to locate. From a market dynamics perspective the retail and office sector is changing at a fast pace (eg. fewer larger format retailers) and although we have enough supply, new commercial land may be required in certain areas to respond to unique opportunities. 4. CONCLUSION 4.1 Overall, Clarington has an excess supply of land available for residential development. More specifically, Clarington has 25 ha of excess land within the Built -Up Areas and 85 ha of excess Greenfield land. This indicates that Clarington will be able to meet its growth forecasts and targets. Table 13 gives the overall summary of the land budget analysis. Table 13 — Land Budqet Summary for Clarington's Urban Areas *Totals do not include rural units or areas Tables 14 and 15 give the final Intensification and Greenfield unit allocations for the three urban areas in Clarington, after accounting for Newcastle's deficit of land area within the Built Boundary and the Bowmanville and Newcastle deficit in the Greenfield Areas. Table 14 —Final Land Budget for Intensification Units by Urban Area Units within the Built Boundary (2015 -2031) Greenfield Units (2013 -2031) TOTAL* Required Units 6,181 13,462 19,643 Committed and Proposed Units 3,039 6,267 9,306 Remaining Units 3,142 7,195 10,337 Gross Area Required for Remaining Units 30 upgh /16 upgh 105 ha 450 ha 555 ha Supply 130 ha 535 ha 665 ha Surplus 25 ha 85 ha 110 ha *Totals do not include rural units or areas Tables 14 and 15 give the final Intensification and Greenfield unit allocations for the three urban areas in Clarington, after accounting for Newcastle's deficit of land area within the Built Boundary and the Bowmanville and Newcastle deficit in the Greenfield Areas. Table 14 —Final Land Budget for Intensification Units by Urban Area 8 -53 Total Urban Courtice Bowmanville Newcastle Areas Intensification Allocation Units, 2015 2031 2,055 3,602 524 6,181 Total Committed and Proposed Units 260 2,405 374 3,039 Total Units Remaining 1,795 1,197 150 3,142 Land required (Density as per analysis 30 upgh) 60 40 5 105 Gross developable land available 78 47 5 130 Surplus land within the Built Boundary I '18 1 7 1 0 1 25 8 -53 REPORT NO.: PSD- 043 -13 PAGE 29 Table 15'— Final Land Budqet for Greenfield Units by Urban Area The land budget presented in this report clearly demonstrates that Clarington can meet the growth forecast and intensification target as set out by the Region. The land budget analysis concludes that there is sufficient capacity within the overall Built Boundary and Designated Greenfield Areas to accommodate the forecasted population and units. This is in conformity with the policies of the Growth Plan and the Regional Official Plan and progresses towards a compact, pedestrian and transit supportive community designed to achieve an average minimum density of 50 people and jobs per ha in the Designated Greenfield Areas and a minimum intensification target of 6,181 units. The upcoming Official Plan Amendment will need to provide policies which achieve the Region's forecasts for Clarington's 140,340 people and 52,120 households, while providing a well integrated urban form that is compatible with the existing character of each respective community. 4.2 Challenges for Clarington Accommodating intensification will be a challenge. Although land supply is available, Clarington is on the periphery of the Region and does not have the same resources (e.g. sewer, water) and advantages (e.g. GO Train, Bus Rapid Transit, proximity to Toronto) as other municipalities to attract new residents that would choose to live in higher densities. Should these services continue to not be available, Clarington will have difficulty meeting the intensification target. Moreover, Clarington's contribution to the Regional intensification targets will be limited due to the large rural areas and the low density form of most neighbourhoods. The Municipality will need to more than double its Intensification rate to meet the Region's targets. Consequently, it might be necessary to supplement our current development charge incentives for intensification. Given the nature of uncertainty in long range forecasting, another precaution is necessary. Overestimating the density assumptions in the Designated Greenfield Areas may misrepresent the actual amount of residential development lands in Clarington. At the same time the Intensification density assumptions are uncharacteristically high for Clarington and would not conform to the local character of most neighbourhoods. So it is not just necessary to have services and market demand for intensification, it is also necessary to have community acceptance and support for this type of compact development. The Official Plan needs to provide clear guidance through urban design policies and guidelines as to how intensification will take place while respecting the 8 -54 Total Urban Courtice Bowmanville Newcastle Areas Greenfield Allocation Units 20132031 2,643 7,763 3,056 13,462 Total Committed and proposed Units 904 3,379 1,964 6,267 Total Units Remaining 1,739 4,304 1,072 7,195 Land required (Density as per analysis 16 upgh ) 109 274 67 450 Gross developable land available 194 274 67 535 Surplus land within Greenfield Areas 35 0 0 05 The land budget presented in this report clearly demonstrates that Clarington can meet the growth forecast and intensification target as set out by the Region. The land budget analysis concludes that there is sufficient capacity within the overall Built Boundary and Designated Greenfield Areas to accommodate the forecasted population and units. This is in conformity with the policies of the Growth Plan and the Regional Official Plan and progresses towards a compact, pedestrian and transit supportive community designed to achieve an average minimum density of 50 people and jobs per ha in the Designated Greenfield Areas and a minimum intensification target of 6,181 units. The upcoming Official Plan Amendment will need to provide policies which achieve the Region's forecasts for Clarington's 140,340 people and 52,120 households, while providing a well integrated urban form that is compatible with the existing character of each respective community. 4.2 Challenges for Clarington Accommodating intensification will be a challenge. Although land supply is available, Clarington is on the periphery of the Region and does not have the same resources (e.g. sewer, water) and advantages (e.g. GO Train, Bus Rapid Transit, proximity to Toronto) as other municipalities to attract new residents that would choose to live in higher densities. Should these services continue to not be available, Clarington will have difficulty meeting the intensification target. Moreover, Clarington's contribution to the Regional intensification targets will be limited due to the large rural areas and the low density form of most neighbourhoods. The Municipality will need to more than double its Intensification rate to meet the Region's targets. Consequently, it might be necessary to supplement our current development charge incentives for intensification. Given the nature of uncertainty in long range forecasting, another precaution is necessary. Overestimating the density assumptions in the Designated Greenfield Areas may misrepresent the actual amount of residential development lands in Clarington. At the same time the Intensification density assumptions are uncharacteristically high for Clarington and would not conform to the local character of most neighbourhoods. So it is not just necessary to have services and market demand for intensification, it is also necessary to have community acceptance and support for this type of compact development. The Official Plan needs to provide clear guidance through urban design policies and guidelines as to how intensification will take place while respecting the 8 -54 REPORT t '=D 0 PAGE character of stable neighbourhoods. Community awareness and education on the benefits of compact development is necessary as well as a clearly defined urban design polices to ensure community character is maintained and enhanced. Another concern for Clarington is that a large portion of the committed Greenfield development does not have sufficient services allocated to them and would require these services before development can proceed. The cost of providing these services in combination with the amount of excess land, means that Clarington will need to prepare a phasing strategy which will examine access to municipal and regional servicing and the financial implications of servicing these lands. Another challenge that Clarington faces in planning for 52,000 people and 22,000 greenfield and intensification units is the impact of this growth on our natural environment. The community has established the protection of the environment as the first priority of the Official Plan Review. Accordingly, the Natural Heritage system that is being proposed reflects this priority. In addition, the PRIORITY GREEN Clarington project initiated recently by Council and funded by the Ministry of Environment and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities Green Fund will look into how development from site plan to building construction, will support conservation of our natural resources while fostering our quality of life. It is important to recognize that there will be additional opportunities to examine the land budget for Clarington to 2031. In accordance with the Planning Act, the Official Plan is to be reviewed every five years after the date the comprehensive review of the Official Plan comes into force and effect. As a result a minimum of three such reviews will occur before the 2031 planning horizon, which provides an opportunity to revisit assumptions, and respond to market conditions and new legislation. While there are many challenges that Clarington will face over the next 20 years, the policy changes introduced in the Growth Plan are important for the success of the Municipality to meet the growing needs of our aging population, to provide vibrant, diversified, and active environments (good quality of life), to obtain economic efficiency on the growing infrastructure costs (including public transit), and to rethink the traditional form of our communities. "The real challenge is not to do away with suburbs, as some critics seem.to imply, but to adapt them more effectively to changing needs and circumstances and to changing public attitudes and expectations about suburban development, suburban environment, and the suburban way of life. In this respect, Canadian suburbs, and hence Canadian cities, must forever remain in transition, " (Canadian Cities in Transition, 2006: Chapter 12 — Suburbs, Peter J. Smith) REPORT i) PS G -04 1 3 PAGE 1 CONFORMITY WITH 'SiRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Carlos Salazar and Nicole Granzotto Attachments: Attachment 1 — Glossary/Definitions Attachment 2a — Courtice Urban Area Structure Attachment 2b — Bowmanville Urban Area Structure Attachment 2c — Newcastle Urban Area Structure Attachment 2d — Orono Urban Area Structure Attachment 3 — Regional Official Plan Characteristics of Each Urban Component Attachment 4 — Hemson Community Forecast Report for Clarington, January 2013 List of interested parties to be notified of Council's decision: List of interested parties can be obtained from the Planning Services Department. 8 -56 Attachment 1 To Report PSD- 043 -13 Settlement Area Boundary: The boundary of land that have been designated for urban development in an Official Plan. Built Boundary: The limits of the developed urban area as defined by the Ministry of Infrastructure on April 2nd, 2008, Designated Greenfield Area: The area between the settlement boundary and the built boundary that has been approved for development but is currently vacant. Built -up Area: all land within the built boundary. Intensification Areas: Area within the built boundary but further identified by the municipality. Urban Growth Centres: These areas are identified in the Growth Plan and are generally downtowns of large and mid -size cities. Intensification Corridor. Intensification areas along major roads, arterials or higher order transit corridors that have the potential to provide a focus for higher density mix -use development consistent with planned transit service levels. Major Transit Station Areas: The area including or around any existing or planned higher order transit station within a settlement area, or a major bus depot in an urban core. Floor space index (FSI): means the ratio of gross floor area of a building to its respective lot area. For example, a lot with an area of 10,000 square metres would support a building of 25,000 square metres or more, based on a FSI of 2.5 (ratio of 2.5:1). Gross density: is a means of measuring the ratio of people, jobs and units to a broad land area (e.g. Greenfield areas). For the purposes of the Regional Official Plan, the measurement excludes significant natural heritage features (wetlands, coastal wetlands, woodlands, valley lands, areas of natural and scientific interest, habitat of endangered species and threatened species, wildlife habitat and fish habitat), and major infrastructure that is built or approved under the Environmental Assessment Act (provincial 400 series highway rights -of -way, hydro corridors, hydro generation stations and airports). Net density: is a means of measuring the ratio of people, jobs, or units to the developable parcel level. For the purposes of this Plan, approximately 45% of the gross land area has been used to calculate the net density (REGION definition) ry 0 0 12� W z 0 n a (-JHj] BUILT-UP AREA DESIGNATED GREENFIELD AREA i REGIONAL CORRIDOR 0 REGIONAL CENTRE TRANSIT STATION Attachment 2a 'j-0 F-Zepol-t PSD-043-13 man law Mon flows NO ■ soon _o W z 00 0 U) ry COURTICE BUILT BOUNDARY Attachment 2b To Report PSD- 043 -13 Attachment 2c r„ Qon„r+ oQn_nn'�_.l� .1 0 O U) C) 0 S'Wr!ON O tY Attachment 2d To Report PSD-043-13 TAUNTON ROAD 0 01.. LL ;k a j4A u ui TAMBLYN RD 0 2 f?dHILL A OIVSI-' f IN T F A E - tMfpM::qwA rzrZT-----i I -- I- M CO S-T PRINCES e `7 .'�.JI ..Gbl3 DICK --A-k I j i CONCESSION ROADS ff (Lj� �R' . L PO ND RD W H] � I ORONO I BUMT BOUMDA P-%Y BUILT -UP AREA E)E-SIGNATED GREENFIELD AREA Attachment 3 To Report PSD-043-13 ME& Density Floor Urban Structure Location per 'Space Built7Form Gross ha*—, Index Regional Centres: 1. Courtice Town Centre 75 residential 2.5 Mix of mostly high-rise These areas are to be planned 2. Bowmanville West Town units and some mid-rise as the main concentration of . Centre , developments. urban activities but generally at 3. Bowmanville East Town a smaller scale than Urban Centre Growth Centres providing a 4. Newcastle Village Centre. fully integrated array of institutional, commercial, major Note: These areas were retail, residential, recreational, already designated in the cultural, entertainment and previous Official Plan. major office uses. They should -function as a symbolic and physical interest for the residents and provide identity to the local area, Local Centres: To be identified by the 30 2.0 A variety of mid-rise Shall be detailed in area Municipality as part of the residential and some low and municipal official plans. Clarington Official, Plan units high buildings. Review process. Regional Corridors: 1. Highway 2 (Courtice) 60 2.5 Living Areas along the These areas are to be planned 2. Courtice Rd. from residential Regional Corridors for higher density mixed use Highway 2 to 401 units are to be developed developments that will support (Courtice) for higher density higher order transportation 3. Bloor St. (Courtice) mixed use services and pedestrian 4. King St. (Bowmanville) developments. oriented built forms. The Regional corridors provide *King St. and Highway 2 efficient transportation links to were designated as Urban Growth Centres and Regional Corridors in the Regional Centres as well as previous Official Plan. other centres within the municipalities. Local Corridors: May be designated as of the 30 2.0 The built form should Shall be detailed in area Clarington Official Plan residential be a wide variety of municipal official plans, Review process. units mid-rise buildings. Waterfront Places: 1. Port Darlington 60 2.0 The built form should Waterfront places shall be 2. Port of Newcastle residential be sensitive to the developed as focal points along units natural environment. the Lake Ontario waterfront Note: These areas were providing for a mix of uses, already designated in the integrated with the "Greenlands previous Official Plan. System" designation. Uses include residential, commercial, marina, recreational, tourist, and cultural and community facilities, ME& Urban Structure Location Density'_ per .; Gross ha* Floor Space Index Built Form Transit Stations: 1. Future Courtice GO Rail 120 n/a Areas surrounding These areas are major travel Station Area: residential these transit stations destinations and facilitate 2. Future Bowmanville GO units are to be developed transfers between different Rail Station Area. for higher densities modes of travel or between and a mix of uses at transit services. The extent and Note: These areas may be an appropriate scale delineation of the boundaries designated in Clarington's and context. The built and land use designations shall Official Plan. form should be be detailed in area municipal designed in a way official plans. which reduces walking distances to transfer facilities and supports non -auto modes by reducing surface parking. *refers to the overall long term density target calculated to a broad land area and not to a specific site Attachment 4 To Report PSD- 043 -13 Re: Claringt®n Co' mm xngty Forecast Update 2013 HEMSONC.nsulting Ltd. 30 Saint. Patrick Street, Suite 1000 Toronto, ON, M5T 3A3 January 25, 2013 MM HEMSON Consulting Ltd. 30 St. Patrick Street, Suite 1000, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 3A3 Facsimile (416) 595 -7144 Telephone (416) 593 -5090 e -mail: hmson@hemson.com To: Carlos Salazar From: Russell Mathew, Stefan Krzeczunowicz Date: January 25, 2013 Re: Clarington Community Forecast Update 2013 In 2009, as part of planning for long -term growth and to assist with. the implementation of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (the Growth Plan) and the Durham Regional Plan, Hemson Consulting Ltd, was retained by the Municipality of Clarington to prepare growth forecasts. The forecasts were of population, housing and employment for the entire municipality as-well as for the. three urban communities of Bowmanville, Courtice and Newcastle, and the rural area within Clarington. Statistics Canada has recently released population, households and housing data collected as part of the 2011 Census. Given the need for up -to -date growth forecasts for land use planning, the Municipality has retained Hemson to review and update the 2009 population and housing forecasts. This memorandum summarizes the results of the review. Employment data from the 2011 Census is not scheduled to be released until the spring of 2013. Therefore, the review does not update the 2009 employment forecast. M. I A. MUNICIPALITY -WIDE POPULATION FORECAST WILL BASED ON LEGION'S 2031 POPULATION ALLOCATION The Growth Plan establishes population and employment forecasts to 2031 for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH) and its constituent upper- and single -tier municipalities, including the Region of Durham. On November, 2, 2012, the Province released a proposed amendment to the Growth Plan that would update the forecasts. Of importance to this review is that: ® the proposed amendment extends the forecasts for the Region of Durham to 2041; the forecasts are premised on slightly higher population growth in the Region. than what is anticipated under the current Growth Plan - 970,000 people under the proposed amendment versus 960,000 people in the Growth Plan; and ® notwithstanding the slightly higher population growth, the 2031 population and employment forecasts for the Region under the proposed amendment would remain the same - 960,000 people and 350,000 employment —as in the current Growth Plan. Under the proposed amendment, upper -tier municipalities would still be responsible for allocating the forecasts provided in the Growth Plan to local municipalities. Given that Durham's 2031 population forecast remains 960;000, it has been assumed in this review that the Region's population allocation for Clarington of 140,300 by 2031 would also remain unchanged.` The updated population forecast is shown in Table 1. ' The 2031 forecast allocated to Clarington. represents the "total' population, in that it includes an estimate of Census net under- coverage (or undercount). Total population is distinct from the Census population, which excludes the undercount. 3 Table 1 Clarin ton Population Growth Forecast Total Growth Compound Annual 2009 Forecast Growth Rate 1986 35,400 — — 35,400 1991 51,400 16,000 7.8% 51,400 1996 63,000 11,600 4.1% 63,000 2001 72,600 9,600 2.9% 72,600 2006 80,900 8,300 2.2% 80,900 2011 87,700 6,700 1.6% 89,700 2016 97,100 9,400 2.1% 100,800 2021 109,800 12 600 2.5 % 114,100 2026 123,900 14,100 2.5% 127,600 2031 140,400 16,500 2•.5% 140,300 Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Canada and Hemson Consulting Ltd, Note: Population is total population including Census net under - coverage. B. MUNICIPALITY -WIDE HOUSEHOLD FORECAST IS LOWER THAN 2009 REFLECTING UPDATED DEMOGRAPHIC ASSUMPTIONS The forecasts in the proposed Growth Plan amendment include updated assumptions about fertility, mortality and migration and project higher population growth for nearly every municipality in the GGH. However, in most cases the forecasts do not result in a corresponding increase in housing units to accommodate the added population. This is because the two biggest factors influencing higher growth — higher fertility and longer life expectancy —do not result in a corresponding increase in housing units: © Higher fertility rates contribute to a higher population forecast for the GGH and Region of Durham. However, much of the additional population (i.e. children) will be accommodated within existing households. o Increased life expectancy also contributes to a higher population forecast for the GGH and Region. This tends to extend the term of existing two - person households and reduce the growth of single - person households among the elderly. As a result, fewer additional households are created. LIM M In effect, higher fertility and life expectancy will lead to higher household sizes in Durham, which reduces the growth of households and housing units. The population of 970,000 forecast for' Durham in 2031 is projected to be accommodated within 336,160 households. In contrast, the new Regional Official Plan (based on the currently proposed settlement of the Seaton . and ROPA 128 Ontario Municipal Board hearings) is based on 960,000 people being accommodated within 356,610 households by 2031.' The effects of higher fertility and mortality on the forecasts for Clarington are similar. While the 2009 forecasts anticipated the 2031 population of 140,300 being accommodated in 50,700 households,' the forecast update projects the same population being accommodated in 49,800 households (see Table 1), Table 2 Clarington Household Forecast 2012 Forecast Update 2009 Forecast Total Growth Annual Average Total Average Households Rate Household Households Household Size Size 1986 10,900 - - 3.07 10,900 3.07 1991 16,400 5,500 8.5% 2.98 16,400 2.98 1996 20,100 3,700 4.2% 2.98 20,100 2.98 2001 23,200 3,100 2.9% 2.97 23,200 2.97 2006 26,900 3,700 3.0% 2.87 26,900 2.87 2011 29,900 3,000 2.2% 2.80 30,200 2.82 2016 33,600 3,700 2.4% 2.76 34,600 2.77 2021 38,400 4,800 2.7% 2.73 39,900 2.72 2026 43,800 5,400 2.7% 2.70 45,400 2.68 2031 49,800 6,100 2.6% 2.69 50,700 2.66 Change 19,900 (0.11) 20,500 (0.21) 2011 -2031 (3.9 %) (7.3 %) Source: Statistics Canada, Census of Canada and Hemson Consulting Ltd. Note: Average household size is calculated by dividing the Census population by the total number of households. 2 For more discussion see Hemson Consulting, Greater Golden Horseshoe Forecasts to 2041, November 2012, at www.hemson.com. ' Note that the Regional Official Plan is based on Clarington achieving 52,100 households by 2031. 5' The approach to forecasting households in Clarington remains consistent with 2009 forecast and is based on the following steps: o A household forecast for the Greater Toronto Area and Hamilton (GTAH) is prepared by applying age- specific household formation rates to the GTAH population forecast in the proposed Growth Plan amendment; o The household forecast is converted into a forecast of housing units by type; o The- new housing units are allocated to the Region of Durham based on factors such as historical patterns, the effects of planning policies, the land available to support development, and the capacity (environmental and infrastructure) of the Region to accommodate the forecast growth. o The housing units forecast for the. Region are allocated to the lower -tier municipalities based on similar factors. Clarington's forecast share of the Regional housing market is shown in Table 3. Household and housing by unit type figures have been updated to reflect 2011 Census data and (for the post - Census day 2011 period) building permit data provided by the Municipality. In this way, the forecast growth in housing units by type takes account of recent and anticipated shifts in unit types at the local and regional,level. Table 3 Clarington Share of Durham Re ion Housing Unit Com letions by T ype Single Semi- Rows Apartments Total Detached Detached 1 986 -91 20.4% 4.5% 11.1% 9.3% 17.6% 1991 -96 27.8% 20.7% 27.8% 3.7% 22.7% 1996 -01 17.7% 2.5% 17.6% 11.0% 18.4% 2001 -06 21.8% 0.9% 8.6% 34.7% 16.1% 2006 -11 17.66/. (6.5 %) 8.7% 29.4% 15.9% 2011 -16 22.0 %_ 5.0% 16.0% 13.0% 17.7% 2016 -21 19.0% 10.0% 16.0% 12.5% 16.7% 2021 -26 18.0% 12.061. 16.0% 12.5% 16.0% 2026 -31 17.1% 15.0% 16.0% 12.0% 15.5% Source: C;MHC: and Hemson Consulting Ltd. The table shows that Clarington is forecast to maintain its current market share for single- detached housing and slightly increase its shares of the regional semi- detached and row house market. As in 2009, the Municipality's share of the regional apartment market is forecast to decline over the period to 2031. ._ z C. ALLOCATION TO COMMUNITIES REMAINS BASED ON HOUSING MARKET SHARES The distribution of the overall Clarington housing forecast to its local communities is based on a similar approach to the distribution method to Durham and its constituent lower -tier municipalities. It is generally assumed that the ultimate land capacity in each community remains the same as in 2009. However, the unit types within the ground- related (i.e. non - apartment) units have been shifted to account for changes in the demand as evidenced by the 2011 Census as well as changes in near -term supply as shown in the registered, draft approved and subdivision application information provided by the Municipality. As in 2009, most of the forecast housing unit growth in the Municipality is anticipated to occur in the urban areas of Bowmanville, Courtice and Newcastle. The Municipality's rural area, consistent with both market expectations and planning objectives, is not forecast to accommodate significant growth. The distribution of the Clarington housing market t6 the local communities results in an overall forecast of households by community, which is shown in Table 4 below. Table 4 Clarington Households by Community Bowmanville Courtice Newcastle Rural Total 2006 10,650 7,360 3,030 5,860 26,900 2011 12,510 8,020 2,830 6,580 29,940 2016 14,410 9,100 3,370 6,760 33,640 2021 16,920 10,260 4,260 6,980 38,420 2026 20,000 11,220 5,390 7,220 43,820 2031 23,380 12,200 6,810 7,490 49,880 Growth 2006 -31 12,700 4,800 4,100 1,300 23,000 Source: Statistics Canada Census of Canada and Hemson Consulting Ltd. Note: The Newcastle community includes the Wilmot Creek neighbourhood. The Rural area in this analysis is slightly different from that used by the Region in its population figures for the Clarington Rural area in ROPA 128. The main difference is that Orono is part of the rural area for this analysis, but is part of the urban area in the Region's work. 1 I The population forecast for each community is prepared by applying household size factors (persons per unit or ppu) by unit type to the household forecast, resulting in a forecast of the household population by community. To this, a small component of non - household population is added and the resulting figure is adjusted to account for the Census net under- coverage. The total population forecast by community is shown in Table 5, Table 5 Clarin ton Po ulation by Community Bowmanville Courtice Newcastle Rural Total 2006 31,600 23,200 8,900 17,200 80,900 2011 36,100 24,900 8,300 18,400 87,700 2016 40,500 28,100 9,800 18,700 97,100 2021 47,100 31,300 12,200 19,100 1.09,800 2026 55,100 33,900 15,300 19,600 123,900 2031 64,200 36,600 19,300 20,300 140,400 Growth 32,600 13,400 10,400 3,100 59,400 2006 -31 103% 58% 117% 18% 74% Source: Statistics Canada Census of Canada and Hemson Consulting Ltd. Note: Population is total population including Census net under - coverage. Appendix A provides details of the housing unit forecast for each community including all ppu. assumptions. D. OVERALL GROWTH OUTLOOK FOR CLARINGTON I5 SIMILAR TO 2009 Based on the analysis undertaken for this review and summarized above, the following conclusions can be reached: o Clarington's population is projected to grow steadily to 2031 and at a rate consistent with that anticipated in 2009. Most growth will continue to be focused in the Municipality's urban communities. o Household growth in Clarington will be slower than anticipated in 2009- 23,000 households between 2006 and 2031 versus 23,800 households. Increased fertility and longer life expectancy will lead to higher than anticipated household sizes, which will reduce the growth in households and housing units. Overall household size in the Municipality is forecast to decrease by 0.11 ppu over the period, continuing a long- standing pattern of gradual decline, though at a more moderate rate than forecast in 2009. k k f. • ® Population and household growth in Bowmanville and Newcastle is forecast to be slightly lower than anticipated in 2009, with correspondingly higher growth expected in Courtice and the rural areas. This reflects the pattern of recent construction in the Municipality. The updated population age structure forecast for the Municipality is presented in Appendix B.4 The overall aging of the population in the Municipality is a demographic trend that is typical of most Ontario communities (and much of Canada). In Clarington, the effect of higher fertility rates will result in a greater number of children in the population than was anticipated in 2009. These trends could have the following implications for municipal servicing: Demand for parks, recreation, library and other cultural services will likely increase faster than the rate. of overall population growth, with slightly increased emphasis . on youth programs and, especially in the 2020s, programs for seniors. ®' Demand for fire services is likely to grow faster than the overall population as the high- demand elderly age group grows. This will be especially true of more mature neighbourhoods in Clarington's urban communities as well as neighbourhoods experiencing adult lifestyle developments. Demand for road infrastructure is unlikely to be affected by the forecast change in population age structure, although an increase in the number of seniors in Clarington may result in higher transit ridership during the later part of the forecast period. 'Note that the age structure applies only to the Census population as the age structure of the un- enumerated population is unknown. 8 °72 �) ON .,_ 10 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON NUMBER OF UNITS AND SHARES OF CLARINGTON TOTAL HOUSING MARKET 2006 - 2031 BY COMMUNITY Shares Units Bowmanville Newcastle Singles Semis Rows A ts. All Units 2006 33% 82% 56% 63% 40% 2011 36% 88% 57% 64% 42% 2016 36% 84% 56% 68% 43% 2021 37% 76% 57% 67% 44% 2026 39% 69% 59% 66% 46% 2031 40% 64% 61% 65% 47% Newcastle Bowmanville Singles Semis Rows Apts. All Units 2006 12% 2% 2% 6% 10% 2011 10% 1% 3% 10% 9% 2016 11% 2% 6% 9% 10% 2021 12% 8% 8% 10% 11% 2026 13% 12% 9% 11% 12% 2031 15% 16% 9% 12% 14% Bowmanville Newcastle Sin les Semis Rows Apts. All Units 2006 7,178 805 1,135 1,530 10,648 2011 8,523 820 1,332 1,835 12,510 2016 9,447 876 1,706 2,386 14,414 2021 10,838 1,050 2,223 2,809 16,921 2026 12,418 1,302 2,850 3,427 19,997 2031 14,093 1,649 3,500 4,137 23,379 Newcastle Courtice Singles Semis Rows Apts. All Units 2006 2,497 15 50 135 2,697 2011 2,470 5 80 ' 274 2,829 2016 2,848 21 195 307 3,371 2021 3,434 108 313 404 4,260 2026 4,172 234 424 559 5,389 2031 5,148 407 517 736 6,808 Courtice Rural Singles Semis Rows Apts. All Units 2006 27% 12% 38% 25% 27% 2011 27% 8% 36% 20% 2.7% 2016 28% 11% 35% 17% 27% 2021 '28% 14% 33% 17% 27% 2026 27% 17% 30% 17% 26% 2031 25% 19% 29% 18% 24% Rural Courtice Singles Semis Rows A ts. All Units 2006 28% 5% 3% 6% 23% 2011 26% 4% 4% 7% 22% 2016 25% 3% 3% 6% 20% 2021 23% 3% 2% 6% 18% 2026 21% 2% 2% 6% 16% 2031 20% 1% 2% 6% 15% Courtice Rural Singles Semis Rows A ts. All Units 2006 5,885 115 765 595 7,360 2011 6,529 75 849 568 8,021 2016 7,308 110 1,079 601 9,098 2021 8,070 198 1,291 698 10,256 2026 8,513 323 1,475 904 11,215 2031 8,903 497 1,661 1,141 12,201 Rural 8 ®74 Singles Semis Rows Apts. All Units 2006 5,934 45 65 155 6,199 2011 6,262 35 90 192 6,579 2016 6,407 35 90 225 6,756 2021 6,597 35 90 257 6,979 2026 6,789 35 90 309 7,223 2031 7,000 35 90 368 7,493 8 ®74 11 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON NUMBER OF UNITS AND SHARES OF CLARINGTON TOTAL HOUSING MARKET GROWTH 2006 - 2031 BY COMMUNITY Shares Units _ _. Bomanville Newcastle Singles Semis Rows Apts. All Units 2006 -11 59% -33% 59% 67% 61% 2011.16 42% 52% 52% 85% 51% 2016 -21 48% 50% 61% 65% 52% 2021.26 54% 50% 68% 60% 57% 2026 -31 52% 50% 70% 60% 56% Newcastle Bomanville Sin les Semis Rows Apts. All Units 2006 -11 -1% 22% 9% 31% .4% 2011 -16 17% 15% 16% 5% 15% 2016 -21 20% 25% 14% 15% 19% 2021 -26 25% 25% 12% 15% - 21% 2026.31 30% 25% 10% 15% 23% Bomanville Newcastle Sin les Semis Rows Apts. All Units 2006 -11 1,345 15 197 305 1,862 2011 -16 924 56 374 551 1,904 2016 -21 1,391 174 517 424 2,506 2021 -26 1,580 251 628 617 3,076 2026 -31 1,675 347 650 710 3,382 Newcastle Courtice Singles Semis Rows Apts. All Units 2006 -11 (27) (10) 30 139 132 2011 -16 378 16 115 32 542 2016 -21 586 87 119 98 889 2021 -26 738 126 111 154 1,129 2026 -31 976 174 93 178 1,419 Courtice Rural Singles Semis Rows A ts. All Units 2006 -11 28% 89% 25% -6% 22% 2011 -16 35% 33% 32% 5% 29% 2016 -21 26% 25% 25% 15% 24% 2021 -26 15% 25% 20% 20% 18% 2026 -31 12% 25% 20% 20% 16% Rural Courtice Singles Semis • Rows Apts. All Units 2006 -11 14% 22% 7% 8% 13% 2011 -16 7% 0% 0% 5% 5% 2016 -21 7% 0% 0% 5% 5% 2021 -26 7% 0% 0% 5% 5% 2026.31 7% 0% 0% 5% 4% Courtice Rural Singles Semis Rows A ts. All Units 2006.11 644 (40) 84 (27) 661 2011 -16 779 35 230 32 1,077 2016 -21 762 87 212 98 1,158 2021 -26 443 126 185 206 959 2026 -31 390 174 186 237 986 Rural Singles Semis Rows Apts. All Units 2006 -11 328 (10) 25 37 380 2011 -16 145 - 32 177 2016.21 190 - - 33 223 2021.26 192 51 243 2026 -31 211 59 271 12 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE 2006 - 2031 BY COMMUNITY Rmvmanville Newcastle Singles Semis Rows Apts. All Units 2006 3.02 2.82 2.56 2.01 2.81 2011 2.96 2,87 2.57 1.89 2.76 2016 2.93 2.84 2.56 1.86 2.70 2021 2.90 2.82 2.54 1.85 2.67 2026 2.88 2.80 2.52 1.84 2.65 2031 2.88 2.79 2.52 1.84 2,64 Newcastle Cnurf irr Singles Semis Rows . Apts. All Units 2006 3.24 2.67 2.42 1.90 3.15 2011 2.91 2.82 2.53 1.86 2.80 2016 2.88 2.80 2.52 1.83 2.77 2021 2.86 2.77 2.50 1.82 2.73 2026 2.84 2.75 2.49 1.81 2.70 2031 2.84 2.75 2,49 1.81 2.69 Cnurf irr Rural Singles Semis Rows A ts. All Units 2006 3.16 2.95 2.68 2,10 3.02 2011 3.09 3.00 2.69 1.98 2.97 2016 3.06 2.97 2,68 1.95 2.94 2021 3,03 2.95. 2.66 1.93 2,91 2026 3.01 2.92 2.64 1.92 2.87 2031 3.01 2.92 2.64 1.92 2.86 Rural • . Singles Semis Rows A ts. All Units 2006 2.67 2.65 2.40 1.88 2.65 2011 2.67 2.59 2.32 1.70 2.63 2016 2.64 2.56 2.31 1.68 2.60 2021 2.62 2.54 2.29 1.67 2.58 2026 2.60 2.52 2.28 1.66 2.55 2031 2.60 2.52 2.28 1.66 2.55 • . 13 1' M Al Age/Sex Forecast Note that the age structure applies only to the Census population as the age structure of the un- enumerated population is unknown. ROM W Municipality of Clarington 2006 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 39,830 40,160 79,990 0 -4 2,500 2,320 ,4,820 5 - 9 2,930 2,900 5,830 10 -14 3,560 3,400 6,960 15 -19 3,250 2,940 6,190 20.24 2,230 2,210 4,440 25 •29 2,260 2,220 4,480 30 -34 2,650 2,690 5,340 35 -39 2,970 3,310 6,280 40.44 3,990 4,090 8,080 45.49 3,440 3,230 6,670 50 -54 2,580 2,540 5,120 55 -59 2,150 2,150 4,300 60.64 1,fi40 1,660 3,300 65.69 1,150 1,270 2,420 70.74 1,000 1,040 2,040 75.79 780 940 1,720 80.84 480 710 1,190 85 -89 210 380 590 90+ 60 160 220 W Municipality of Clarington 2011 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 42,280 42,850 13 85,0 0.4 2,500 2,360 4,860 5.9 2,770 2,550 5,320 10.14 3,040 3,040 6,080 15 - 19 3,670 3,370 7,040 20-24 2,710 2,440 5,150 25-29 2,310 2,400 4,710 30 -34 2,610 2,760 5,370 35 -39 2,830 2,920 5,750 40 -44 3,010 3,420 6,430 45 -49 3,940 4,070 8,010 50.54 3,470 3,290 6,760 55.59 2,540 2,560 5,100 60.64 2,130 2,170 4,300 65-69 1,660 1,680 3,340 70-74 1,160 1,260 2,420 75-79 890 980 1,870 80 -84 630 770 1,400 115-89 320 540 860 90+ 90 270 360 W j 2011 Age Structure I 90t I 85 -89 - -- -- -- 80.84 _I 75.79 `•_ - 70 -74 _- 65-69 55-59 .. -_'- .. - 50-54 1 I 1 I 1 _J .. nkmale 40-44 3539 25-29 . �- - 15.19 1. 10 -14 I T. - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 • - 2006 Age Structure 909 _ 85 -89 -- - 80.84 J 70.74 65.69 '• '.....f__ J. I.._�� • - - _ -I 60 -64 55.59` 45-49 35-39 _ .._ J .. ,I I :, 1 .. 1 .. 30-34 25-29 20-24 10-14 1 1 �I 1 1 1 - - 5 9 0 4 ...., �. 1 _. I J- 1 .. • 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 j 2011 Age Structure I 90t I 85 -89 - -- -- -- 80.84 _I 75.79 `•_ - 70 -74 _- 65-69 55-59 .. -_'- .. - 50-54 1 I 1 I 1 _J .. nkmale 40-44 3539 25-29 . �- - 15.19 1. 10 -14 I T. - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 • - • ... 1 15 2016 Age Structure 80.84 a, 50.54 40-44 - ! Male 20.24 10-14 L -- 0 4 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 - Municipality of C arington 2016 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 45,840 47,680 93,520 0.4 2,590 2,450 5,040 5.9 2,690 2,550 5,240 10.14 2,950 2,720 5,670 15-19 3,910 3,660 7,770 20 -24 4,320 4,220 8,540 25.29 3,160 3,220 6,380 30 -34 2,540 2,770 5,310 35 -39 2,600 2,930 5,530 40 -44 2,860 3,060 5,920 45.49 2,980 3,460 6,440 50 -54 3,830 4,030 7,860 55 -59 3,270 3,190 6,460 60 -64 2,360 2,500 4,860 65 -69 1,970 • 2,100 4,070 70.74 1,520 1,620 3,140 75.79 1,000 1,170 2,170 80.84 710 840 1,550 85 -89 390 580 970 90+ 190 410 600 • ... 1 15 2016 Age Structure 80.84 a, 50.54 40-44 - ! Male 20.24 10-14 L -- 0 4 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 - Municipality of C arington 2021 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 51,480 54,270 105,750 0 -4 3,050 2,890 5,940 5 -9 2,890 2,720 5,610 10 -14 3,040 2,850 5,890 15 - 19 3,760 3,530 7,290 20 -24 4,740 5,010 9,750 25-29 5,200 5,410 10,610 30.34 3,640 3,790 7,430 35.39 2,660 3,050 5,710 40.44 2,770 3,180 5,950 45 -49 2,970 3,200 6,170 50.54 2,960 3,470 6,430 55.59 3,650 3,920 7,570 60 -64 3,070 3,100 6,170 65.69 2,220 2 420 .4,640 70.74 1,860. 2,030 3,890 75-79 1,380 1,520 2;900 80-84 840 1,030 1,870 85 -89 490 650 1,140 90+ 290 500 790 • ... 1 15 2016 Age Structure 80.84 a, 50.54 40-44 - ! Male 20.24 10-14 L -- 0 4 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 - Municipality of Clarington 2026 Age Strudure Male Female Total Total 57,820 61,550 119,370 0 -4 4,030 3,820 7,850 5 - 9 3,350 3,160 6,510 10.14 3,270 3,020 6,290 15 • 19 3,720 3,550 7,270 20.24 4,530 4,680 9,210 25 -29 5,670 6,270 11,940 30 -34 .5,680 6,000 11,680 35 -39 3,760 4,050 7,810 40 -44 2,830 3,300 6,130 45 -49 2,900 3,330 6,230 50 -54 2,970 3,190 6,160 55 -59 2,810 3,360 6,170 60.64 3,460 3,820 7,280 65-69 2,920 3,010 5,930 70 -74 2,110 2,370 4,480 75 -79 1,690 1,910 3,600 80 •84 1,140 1,350 2,490 85 -89 590 790 1,380 90+ 390 570 960 • ... 1 15 2016 Age Structure 80.84 a, 50.54 40-44 - ! Male 20.24 10-14 L -- 0 4 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 - Municipality of Ciarington 2031 Age Structure Male Female , Total Total 65,310 69,900 135,210 0 -4 5,190 4,910 10,100 5 - 9 4,340 4,090 8,430 11-14 3,740 3,460 7,200 15 - 19 3,960 3,730 7,690 20 -24 4,51 0 4,750 9,260 25.29 5,500 5,980 11,480 30 -34 6,180 6,880 13,060 35 -39 5,810 6,280 12,090 40 -44 3,940 4,310 8,250 45-49 2,970 3,460 6,430 50.54 2,91 0 3,330 6,240 55.59 2,820 3,100 5,920 60-64 2,63 0 3,270 5,900 65 -69 3,31 0 3,720 7,030 70-74 2,790 2,930 5,720 75 -79 1,940 2,220 4,160 80 -84 1,440 1,690 3,130 85.89 850 1,070 1,920 90+ 480 720 1,200 • ... 1 15 2016 Age Structure 80.84 a, 50.54 40-44 - ! Male 20.24 10-14 L -- 0 4 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 - T_.- -_ -_- - - -� - -- 2026 Age Structure 901 �- 80.64 _� l 70 -74 60 -64 3 - _ r 1 � 50.54 7 40.44 30.34 20.24 10 -14 J - I i 0-4 - 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 2031 Age Structure 80 -84 i 70.74 - :..!_• , __-. 60.64 - 1 40 -44 30.34 -_:J - �. ±30 -14 - 1- 6,000 7,000 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 • 8,000 o kmale o Male d kmale Male IC 2006 Age Structure 90. - 80.84 -;'-- 70.74 ! 60-64 50.54 40.44 30 34 20.24 1 !' .I. -. 10.14 0-4 • 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2011 Age Structure 901 ' 80 -84 60.64 - .1 50.54 - !. ::.,.. I __.. - L -I... 40-44 t,• J -. I i 1� r 30 34 20 24 3' 10.14 , I ...� -_.. I. _ ,'J _ _J_- I...- I,:..• . 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 oeemete Male .female Mile NMI] Bomanvil e 2006 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 15,650 15,960 31,610 0.4 ,,120 ,.050 2,170 5 -9 1,260 ,,240 2,500 10 -14 1,360 1,290 2,650 15- 19 1,210 1,080 2,290 20 -24 890 930 1,820 25 -29 1,180 1,150 2,330 30.34 1,290 1,290 2,580 35 -39 1,270 1,400 2,670 40 -44 1,510 1,5.50 3,060 45 -49 1,230 1,120 2,350 50 -54 880 890 1,770 55 -59 710 740 1,450 60 -64 540 560 1,100 65-69 350 420 770 70-74 330 350 680 75-79 250 380 630 80-84 170 280 450 85 -89 80 170 250 90+ 20 70 90 IC 2006 Age Structure 90. - 80.84 -;'-- 70.74 ! 60-64 50.54 40.44 30 34 20.24 1 !' .I. -. 10.14 0-4 • 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2011 Age Structure 901 ' 80 -84 60.64 - .1 50.54 - !. ::.,.. I __.. - L -I... 40-44 t,• J -. I i 1� r 30 34 20 24 3' 10.14 , I ...� -_.. I. _ ,'J _ _J_- I...- I,:..• . 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 oeemete Male .female Mile NMI] Bomanville 2011 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 17,160 17,810 34,970 0 -4 1,270 1,220 2,490 5 -9 1,230 1,130 2,360 10 -14 1,280 1,280 2,560 15 • 19 1,440 1,310 2,750 20 - 24 1,040 970 2,010 25 -29 1,120 1,220 2,340 30 - 34 1,360 1,420 2,780 35 -39 1,330 1,370 2,700 40 - 44 1,280 1,430 2,710 45 - 49 1,460 1,550 3,010 50 -54 1,200 11170 2,370 55 -59 860 950 1,810 60 - 64 720 770 1,490 65.69 540 590 1,130 70-74 360 390 750 75-79 300 360 660 80-84 210 330 540 85 -89 130 230 360 90+ 30 120 150 IC 2006 Age Structure 90. - 80.84 -;'-- 70.74 ! 60-64 50.54 40.44 30 34 20.24 1 !' .I. -. 10.14 0-4 • 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2011 Age Structure 901 ' 80 -84 60.64 - .1 50.54 - !. ::.,.. I __.. - L -I... 40-44 t,• J -. I i 1� r 30 34 20 24 3' 10.14 , I ...� -_.. I. _ ,'J _ _J_- I...- I,:..• . 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 oeemete Male .female Mile NMI] =11 17 2016 Age Structure 70-74 60-64 20-24 10-14 r_, l J 0 4 - 200 400 600 800 I;00o 1,200 1,400 1,600 Bomanville 2016 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 18,740 20,100 38,840 0 -4 1,250 1,180 2,430 5 -9 1,340 1,310 2,650 10 -14 1,290 1,200 2,490 15 - 19 1,630 1,620 3,250 20 -24 1,670 1,650 3,320 25.29 1,210 1,290 2,500 30 -34 1,210 1,390 2,600 35.39 1,360 1,510 2,870 40 -44 1,330 1,430 2,760 45.49 1,250 1,450 2,700 50 -54 1,400 1,540 2,940 55 -59 1,120 1,140 2,260 60.64 790 940 1,730 65-69 660 750 1,410 70-74 490 580 1,070 75-79 310 380 690 80.84 240 310 550 85 -89 120 260 380 90+ 70 170 240 =11 17 2016 Age Structure 70-74 60-64 20-24 10-14 r_, l J 0 4 - 200 400 600 800 I;00o 1,200 1,400 1,600 Bomanvi e 2021 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 21,690 23,470 45,160 0 -4 1,410 1,340 2,750 5 -9 1,400 1,320 2,720 10 -14 1,520 1,460 2,980 15-19 1,700 1,610 3,310 20-24 2,050 2,210 4,260 25-29 2,120 2,260 4 :380 30 -34 1,450 1,580 3,030 35.39 1,270 1,530 2,800 40 -44 1,440 1,630 3,070 45 -49 1,390 1,500 2,890 50 -54 1,250 1,450 2,700 55-59 1,320 1,490 2,810 60 -64 1,030 1,100 2,130 65-69 740 910 1,650 70 -74 630 740 1,370 75-79 450 550 1,000 80-84 260 340 600 85 -89 170. 240 410 90+ 90 210 300 =11 17 2016 Age Structure 70-74 60-64 20-24 10-14 r_, l J 0 4 - 200 400 600 800 I;00o 1,200 1,400 1,600 Bomanvi e 2026 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 25,290 27,610 52,900 0.4 1,800 1,710 3,510 5 -9 1,590 1,500 3,090 10 -14 1,630 1,500 3,130 15 -19 1,930 1,880 31810 20 -24 2,170 2,310 4,480 25-29 2,620 2,970 5,590 30 -34 2,410 2,620 5,030 35.39 1,530 1,740 3,270 40 -44 1,370 1,680 3,050 45 -49 1,520 1,720 3,240 50 -54 1,390 1,500 2,890 55 -59 1,160 1,390 2,550 60 -64 1,220 1,450 2,670 65-69 69 970 1,070 2,040 70-74 710 900 1,610 75-79 580 700 1,280 80 -84 380 490 870 85 -89 180 260 440 90+ 130 220 350 =11 17 2016 Age Structure 70-74 60-64 20-24 10-14 r_, l J 0 4 - 200 400 600 800 I;00o 1,200 1,400 1,600 Bomanville 2031 Age 51ructure Male Female Total rota 29,430 32,220 61,650 0 -4 2,390 2,260 4,650 5 - 9 1,990 1,870 3,860 10-14 1,820 1,680 3,500 15- 1 9 2,030 1,910 3,940 20-24 2,390 2,580 4,970 25 -29 2,730 3,060 5,790 30-34 2,910 3,330 6,240 35 -39 2,490 2,780 5,270 40-44 1,640 1,890 3,530 45 -49 1,450 1,770 3,220 50 -54 1,530 1,730 3,260 55 -59 1,310 1,450 2;760 60 -64 1,070 1,350 2,420 65 -69 1,160 1,410 2,570 70-74 930 1,050 1,980 75 -79 660 850 1,510 80-84 -490 620 1,110 85 -89 280 390 670 90+ 160 240 4011 =11 17 2016 Age Structure 70-74 60-64 20-24 10-14 r_, l J 0 4 - 200 400 600 800 I;00o 1,200 1,400 1,600 a FemaN Ma+e 1,800 2,500 - 500 11000 11500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 f i I dfemale e Male n F-I. Male 2031 Age Structure 70 74 1 •' 60-64 50-54 ... _1 .. � ... 4- Male 30-34 1 10-14 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 2026 Age Structure 2021 Age Structure 90+ EaI- 80 -84 - -� I 80- 84' 70-74 ? -_- • 1. . _ 70.74 t 30-34 j 20 24 SO -14 � - J •' I t- 1 10-54 1 I 30,34 _. -J. .. .. i 20-24 1014 0-4 ! I + - -._- • 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 a FemaN Ma+e 1,800 2,500 - 500 11000 11500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 f i I dfemale e Male n F-I. Male 2031 Age Structure 70 74 1 •' 60-64 50-54 ... _1 .. � ... 4- Male 30-34 1 10-14 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 2026 Age Structure 90+ 80 -84 - -� I 70-74 50-54 40-44 30-34 j 20 24 SO -14 � - J •' I t- 1 a FemaN Ma+e 1,800 2,500 - 500 11000 11500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 f i I dfemale e Male n F-I. Male 2031 Age Structure 70 74 1 •' 60-64 50-54 ... _1 .. � ... 4- Male 30-34 1 10-14 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 in 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 Courtice 2006 Age Structure Male Female -�• Total Total 11,500 11,650 23,150 0 -4 750 690 1,440 5-9 890 880 1,770 10 -14 1,140 1,150 2,290 15-19 980 920 1,900 20 -24 640 610 1,250 25 -29 590 590 1,180 30 -34 760 780 1,540 35 -39 930 1,070 2,000 40 -44 1,290 1,310 2,600 45 -49 1,060 1,020 2,080 50-54 730 700 1,430 55.59 580 590 1,170 60-64 390 400 790 65-69 270 280 550 70 -74 220 230 450 75-79 140 160 300 80-84 90 150 240 85 -89 40 80 120 90+ 10 40 50 in 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 Courllce 2011 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 11,905 12,290 24,195 0.4 660 640 1,300 5 - 9 830 810 1,640 10-14 960 940 1,900 15 -19 1,160 1,100 2,260 20 -24 820 720 1,540 25-29 620 670 1,290 30 -34 710 790 1,500 35 -39 820 870 1,690 40 -44 900 1,120 2,020 45.49 1,240 1,280 2,520 50 -54 1,040 1,000 2,040 55-59 660 640 1,300 60 -64 510 550 1,060 65-69 370 360 730 70 -74 230 260 490 75-79 160 210 370 80 -84 130 130 260 85 -89 60 130 190 90+ 25 70 95 in 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 tl Ferr ak Male ' u female Male 2011 Age Structure 80- 84^'T.' 70.74 60-64 " !' 50-54 40.44 30.34 20 -24 L I 10-14 0 -4 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 tl Ferr ak Male ' u female Male • • 19 Courlice 2016 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 13,250 13,900 27,150 0 -4 760 720 1,480 5 •9 730 700 1,430 10 -14 900 870- 1,770 15 - 19 1,260 1,210 2,470 20 -24 11400 1,390 2,790 25 -29 980 980 1,960 30 - 34 700 790 1,490 35 - 39 710 840 1,550 40 -44 840 920 1,760 45 -49 900 1,130 2,030 50 -54 1,220 1,260 2,480 55 •59 980 970 1,950 60.64 610 620 1,230 65 - 69 470 530 1,000 70 - 74 340 350 690 75 - 79 200 240 440 80 - 84 130 180 310 85 -89 80 100 180 90+ 40 100 140 • • 19 Courlice 2021 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 14,730 15,580 30,310 0 - 4 890 840 1,730 5 - 9 830 780 1,610 10 - 14 810 770 1,580 15 - 19 1,080 1,050 2,130 20 -24 1,450 1,470 2,920 25 -29 1,600 1,660 3,260 30 -34 1,090 11110 2,200 35 - 39 730 860 1,590 40 - 44 750 900 1,650 45 •49 860 950 1,810 50 -54 890 11130 2,020 55 -59 1,170 1,230 2,400 60 -64 930 940 1,870 65 - 69 580 600 1,180 70.74 440 510 950 75 - 79 310 330 640 80 - 84 170 210 380 85 -89 90 140 230 90+ 60 100 160 • • 19 CouIce 2026 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 15,880 16,820 32,700 0 -4 1,140 1,080 2,220 5 - 9 920 870 1,790 10-14 870 810 1,680 15 - 19 880 840 1,720 20 -24 1,160 1,170 2,330 25 •29 1,540 1,600 3,140 30 -34 1,640 1,720 3,360 35 -39 1,100 1,130 2,230 40 -44 750 880 1,630 45-49 49 760 910 1,670 50 -54 850 940 1,790 55 -59 870 1,110 1,980 60 -64 1,130 1,210 2,340 65 -69 890 920 1,810 . 70-74 540 580 1,120 75-79 400 480 880 80-84 250 290 540 85 -89 1 120 160 280 90+ 70 120 190 • • 19 Courtice 2031 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 17,190 '18,140 35,330 0 -4 1,360 1,290 2,650 5 -9 1,160 1,100 2,260 10-14 950 890 1,840 15 • 19 930 870 1,800 20 -24 950 940 1,890 25 -29 1,250 1,290 2,540 30-34 11590 1,650 3,240 35 -39 1,650 1,740 3,390 40.44 11110 1,150 2,260 45 -49 760 890 1,650 50 -54 750 910 1,660 55 -59 830 930 1,760 60 -64 840 1,090 1,930 65 -69 1,090 1,180 2,270 70.74 850 880 1,730 75-79 500 540 1,040 80-84 340 420 760 85 -89 190 230 420 90+ 90 150 240 • • 19 • 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 m 2026 Age Structure 80 - 907 70.74 I- 60-64 I I I 1 I I 1 40-44 .1 I - • -.- �. 30 34 213 24 I' 10-14 0-4 - -- 200 400 600 Boo 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 1,800 2,000 u Female a mate u Female aMak 2016 Age Structure 80 -84 - 60 -64 40-44 30-34 20.24 10-14 0-4 r -. 1.-_1--_I_.-- �--'- -- • 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 m 2026 Age Structure 80 - 907 70.74 I- 60-64 I I I 1 I I 1 40-44 .1 I - • -.- �. 30 34 213 24 I' 10-14 0-4 - -- 200 400 600 Boo 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 1,800 2,000 u Female a mate u Female aMak 20 2006 Age Structure 90+ 70.74 -._.. •_ .L.____ f 60 -64 I _ 50 54 1 1 I 1 30-34 '. 1 20,24 10.14 - 3 I 3 - I so 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Newcastle 2006 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 3,720 3,740 7,460 0 - 4 250 220 470 5 -9 250 240 490 10 -14 310 260 570 15 -19 280 260 540 20.24 170 170 340 25-29 29 160 160 320 30 -34 220 230 450 35.39 260 280 540 40 -44 340 340 680 45.49 310 300 610 50.54 240 250 490 55 -59 210 210 420 60 -64 170 170 340 65 -69 140 180 320 70-74 140 130 270 75 -79 130 150 280 80 -84 90 120 210 85 -89 40 60 100 90+ 10 10 20 20 2006 Age Structure 90+ 70.74 -._.. •_ .L.____ f 60 -64 I _ 50 54 1 1 I 1 30-34 '. 1 20,24 10.14 - 3 I 3 - I so 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Newcast e 2011 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 3,980 4,125 8,105 0 - 4 240 210 450 5-9 280 240 520 10 - 14 250 230 480 IS - 19 270 270 540 20 -24 220 210 430 25-29 180 180 360 30 -34 220 230 450 35-39 260 270 530 40 -44 260 300 560 45 -49 320 340 660 50 -54 320 310 630 55.59 260 270 530 60 -64 240 260 500 65 -69 200 230 430 70-74. 170 200 370 75 -79 130 130 260 80 -84 90 130 220 85 -89 50 80 130 90+ 20 35 55 20 2006 Age Structure 90+ 70.74 -._.. •_ .L.____ f 60 -64 I _ 50 54 1 1 I 1 30-34 '. 1 20,24 10.14 - 3 I 3 - I so 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 HEMSON u rtmale Ma= gfemalt Male .-. 2011 Age Structure 90+ 80 70-74 J L 1 60 40,44 L J 30-34 I 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 HEMSON u rtmale Ma= gfemalt Male .-. • • 21 Newcastle 2016 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 4,570 4,890 9,460 0-4 240 230 470 5-9 280 250 530 10-14 320 280 600 15- 19 430 400 830 20 -24 420 450 670 25-29 320 370 690 30 -34 230 250 480 35 -39 220 260 480 40-44 270 290 560 45 -49 260 310 570 50 -54 310 340 650 55.59 290 290 580 60 -b4 230 260 490 65-69 220 250 470 70.74 190 220 410 75-79 79 150 180 330 80-84 100 110 210 85-119 60 90 150 90+ 30 60, 90 • • 21 Newcastle 2021 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 5,650 6,170 11,820 0 - 4 340 320 660 5 ' 9 310 290 600 10 - 14 360 310 670 15 - 19 510 460 970 20.24 620 660 1,280 25 - 29 620 •720 1,340 30 -34 430 500 930 35 -39 260 310 570 40 - 44 260 320 580 45 -49 300 330 630 50.54 260 320 580 55 -59 280 320 600 60 - 64 260 280 540 65 - 69 210 250 460 70.74 210 240 450 75 - 79 170 210 380 80 - 84 130 160 290 85 -89 70 90 160 90+ 50 80 130 • • 21 Newcastle 2026 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 7,020 7,780 14,800 0 -4 550. 520 1,070 5 - 9 420 390 810 10 - 14 410 370 780 15.19 540 500 1,040 20 - 24 710 760 1,470 25 - 29 860 990 1,850 30 - 34 750 870 1,620 35 -39 460 570 1,030 40 -44 300 380 680 45-49 300 360 660 50 -54 310 330 640 55 -59 230 300 530 60-64 250 300 550 65-69 240 270 510 70-74 210 250 460 75 -79 190 230 420 80-84 140 190 330 85 -89 90 120 210 90+ 60 80 140 • • 21 Newcastle 2031 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 8,790 9,850 18,640 0 - 4 810 770 1,580 5- 9 640 600 1,240 10-14 530 480 1,010 15- 19 610 580 1,190 20 -24 770 850 1,620 25 -29 990 1,140 2,130 30 -34 1,010 1,170 2,180 35 -39 790 960 1,750 40 -44 520 650 1,170 45-49 350 430 780 50-54 310 360 670 55 -59 270 310 560 60-64 190 280 470 65-69 230 290 520 70-74 230 270 500 75-79 190 240 430 80-84 170 210 380 85 -89 110 150 260 90+ 70 110 180 • • 21 450 500 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 2026 Age Structure 96 80 -84 70.74 60.64 50 -54 > ... .. 20-24 I 10-14 I 1 I 0-4 [_ ❑Female I Male u Female Male Female Male ��- 200 400 -600 800- 4000 1,200 - - - -J 2031 Age Structure 90a I i 80.84 70.74 60 -64 40.44 30 -34 IfF l _ L I ... T; I 20.24 10.14 I I 0 -4 .4 . 200 400 600 Boo 1,000 I 1,200 1,400 vremaie Male 2021 Age Structure 206 Age Structure 80-84 BO -84 70-7, 60-64 50 -54 1 _ 40 44 30-34 20 24 I . . L:: 1 0 4 1 l _ - 50 100. 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 2026 Age Structure 96 80 -84 70.74 60.64 50 -54 > ... .. 20-24 I 10-14 I 1 I 0-4 [_ ❑Female I Male u Female Male Female Male ��- 200 400 -600 800- 4000 1,200 - - - -J 2031 Age Structure 90a I i 80.84 70.74 60 -64 40.44 30 -34 IfF l _ L I ... T; I 20.24 10.14 I I 0 -4 .4 . 200 400 600 Boo 1,000 I 1,200 1,400 vremaie Male 2021 Age Structure BO -84 60.64 1 l _ 50.54 40 -44 30-34 20 10-14 450 500 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 2026 Age Structure 96 80 -84 70.74 60.64 50 -54 > ... .. 20-24 I 10-14 I 1 I 0-4 [_ ❑Female I Male u Female Male Female Male ��- 200 400 -600 800- 4000 1,200 - - - -J 2031 Age Structure 90a I i 80.84 70.74 60 -64 40.44 30 -34 IfF l _ L I ... T; I 20.24 10.14 I I 0 -4 .4 . 200 400 600 Boo 1,000 I 1,200 1,400 vremaie Male 22 100 200 300 400 Soo 600 700 800 900 1,000 2011 Age Structure 80 70 74 60-64 - Il 50.54 , 40-44 1 ci J 1 _I J 20-24 0-14 -- L L•. 1 -..��_ 1 041 • 100 200 300 400 Soo 600 700 800 900 1,000 u F—Il Mare .N-4 Male • • . Rural 2006 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 8,960 8,810 17,770 0.4 380 360 740' 5 - 9 530 540 1,070 10-14 750 700 1,450 15-19 780 680 1,460 20 -24 530 500 1,030 25 -29 330 320 650 30 -34 380 390 770 35-39 510 560 1,070 40 -44 850 890 1,740 45-49 840 790 1,630 50 -54 730 700 1,430 55 -59 650 610 1,260 60 -64 540 530 1,070 65 -69 390 390 780 70-74 310 330 640 75-79 260 250 510 80-84 130 160 290 85 -89 50 70 120 90+ 20 40 60 22 100 200 300 400 Soo 600 700 800 900 1,000 2011 Age Structure 80 70 74 60-64 - Il 50.54 , 40-44 1 ci J 1 _I J 20-24 0-14 -- L L•. 1 -..��_ 1 041 • 100 200 300 400 Soo 600 700 800 900 1,000 u F—Il Mare .N-4 Male • • . Rural 2011 Age Structure Male Female Total Tota 9,235 8,625 17,860 0 - 4 330 290 620 5 - 9 430 370 800 10.14 550 590 1,140 15 - 19 800 690 1,490 20 - 24 630 540 1,170 25 - 29 390 330 720 30 -34 320 320 640 35 - 39 420 410 830 40 -44 570 570 1,140 45 -49 920 - 900 1,820 50 -54 910 810 1,720 55 -59 760 700 1,460 60-64 660 590 1,250 65 -69 550 500 1,050 70-74 400 410 810 75-79 . 300 280 580 80-84 200 180 380 85 -89 80 "0 "0 90+ 15 45 60 22 100 200 300 400 Soo 600 700 800 900 1,000 2011 Age Structure 80 70 74 60-64 - Il 50.54 , 40-44 1 ci J 1 _I J 20-24 0-14 -- L L•. 1 -..��_ 1 041 • 100 200 300 400 Soo 600 700 800 900 1,000 u F—Il Mare .N-4 Male • • . `i 23 Rural 2016 Age Structure Male female Total Fotal 9,280 8,790 18,070 0 -4 340 320 660 5.9 340 290 630 10 -14 440 370 810 15 - 19 590 630 1,220 20 - 24 830 730 1,560 25 - 29 650 580 1,230 30 -34 400 340 740 35 -39 310 320 630 40 - 44 420 420 840 45.49 570 570 1,140 50 -54 900 890 1,790 55 -59 880 790 1,670 60 -64 730 680 1,410 65.69 620 570 1,190 70-74 500 470 970 75-79 340 370 710 80-84 240 240 480 65 -89 130 130 260 90+ 50 80 130 `i 23 Rural 2021 Age Structure, Male Female Total Total 9,410 9,050 18,460 0 - 4 410 390 800 5 - 9 350 330 680 10-14 350 310 660 15- 19 470 410 880 20 -24 620 670 1,290 25.29 860 770 1,630 30 -34 670 600 1,270 35 -39 400 350 750 40 -44 320 330 650 45-49 420 420 840 50 -54 560 570 1,130 55 -59 880 880 1,760 60 -64 850 780 1,630 65-69 690 660 1,350 70 -74 580 540 1,120 75-79 450 430 880 80 -84 260 320 600 85 -89 160 180 340 90+ 90 110 200 `i 23 Rural 2026 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 9,630 9,340 18,970 0.4 540 510 11050 5.9 420 400 820 10.14 360 340 700 15 -19 370 330 700 20.24 490 440 930 25 -29 650 710 1,360 30.34 880 790 1,670 35.39 670 610 1,280 40-44 410 360 770 45-49 320 340 660 50.54 420 420 840 55.59 550 560 1,110 60.64 860 860 1,720 65-69 820 750 1,570 70.74 650 640 1,290 75-79 520 500 1,020 80.84 370 380 750 85 -89 200 250 450 90+ 130 150 280 `i 23 Rura 2031 Age Structure Male Female Total Total 91900 9,690 19,590 0 -4 630 590 1,220 5 - 9 550 520 1,070 10 -14 440- 410 850 15-19 390 370 760 20.24 400 380 780 25 -29 - 530 490 1,020 30.34 670 730 1,400 35 -39 880 800 1,680 40 -44 670 620 1,290 45 -49 410 370 780 50 -54 320 330 650 55 -59 410 410 820 60 -64 530 550 1,080 65-69 830 640 1,670 70-74 780 730 1,510 75 -79 590 590 1,180 80-84 440 440 880 85 -89 270 300 570 90+ 160 •220 380 `i 23 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 2021 Age Structure 90+ 80-84 1 70 74 L.1 50-54 :.. J1. I - ! 1 I 40-44 J I 1 20-24 10-14 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 F-1. .W. .Female Mala 2026 Age Structure 2016 Age Structure 90+ 9o+ 1 80 84 1 80 -84 60.64 .., 50-14 _ 70.74 40 44 I ,_ Male 30 -34 _! 50 -54 1 -' - 1 I' I -� 1 10-14 � 1 I _ 40 44 - 1,000 1 I 30-34 J :, r ,I 10-14 I i I- I f1 1 . ..I II I 0-4 �.. ... .I : •� 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 2021 Age Structure 90+ 80-84 1 70 74 L.1 50-54 :.. J1. I - ! 1 I 40-44 J I 1 20-24 10-14 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 F-1. .W. .Female Mala 2031 Age Structure 80-84 I l 7074 �.� �I _ I J _•1 .. t 60.64 50.54' 40.44 .! .. i 1 30.34 20.24 1 L- 10 -14 0-4 ... ._I _ - J • 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 I'm M 2026 Age Structure 9o+ 1 80 84 1 60.64 .., 50-14 _ 40 44 I ,_ Male 30 -34 20 24 10-14 � 1 I _ 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 - 1,000 2031 Age Structure 80-84 I l 7074 �.� �I _ I J _•1 .. t 60.64 50.54' 40.44 .! .. i 1 30.34 20.24 1 L- 10 -14 0-4 ... ._I _ - J • 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 I'm M 62'(9-M h6mlfl REPT)RU Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 24, 2013 Resollu on#: By- Ilaw -M Rep ovt e PSD- 044 -13 File #.- S -C -2007 -0002 Subject- NOpSE FENCE FOR LOTS ON WEST SIDE OF VW AN DR11VE RECO�IiMENDATiONS. It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD - 044 -13 be received; and 2 THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD - 044 -13 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: CP /df /nI 18 June 2013 Reviewed by: David' J. Crome, MCIP, RPP Franklin VVu, Director of Planning Services Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 EMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 Raw 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 A letter and petition dated May 28, 2013, was submitted by Mr. Franklin regarding noise levels for the properties on the west side of Vivian Drive, abutting Trulls Road. The letter states that the study dealing with noise for this development was done in the past and "since all the dwellings have now been constructed and occupied, residents have raised concerns with the noise reduction means provided, namely a chain link fence and cedar hedge ". The letter also requests a further noise study be completed as traffic has increased over the last two years. The subdivision was marketed as Courtice Homestead. 20 DDSCUSSS ON 2.1 The noise attenuation study for the - referenced subdivision was prepared in December 2007 with revisions completed in January and,June of 2009. The study was based on a forecasted average annual daily traffic (AADT) volume for Trulls Road of 16,000 vehicles on a four (4) lane road. Based on 2009 counts and allowances for yearly increase in traffic volume, the current AADT on Trulls Road is estimated to be approximately 4500 vehicles on a two (2) lane road, well below the forecasted volumes utilized in the study. The number of vehicles forecasted for Trulls Road is considered to be well in excess of existing actual trips and the noise study and its updates are considered, to be valid. 2.2 In keeping with the Council approved Noise Attenuation Design Guidelines, the use of a noise fence along the arterial road, Trulls Road frontage, was avoided through the subdivision review and approval process. The front lawn, veranda, or combination thereof depending on the model, were used to provide the minimum required amenity area for noise mitigation. The lots on the west side of Vivian Drive are 13.5 and 15 metres wide. The front yard setback to the dwelling was increased from the more typical 4.0 metres to the dwelling to 7.5 metres and 6.5 metres respectively to provide for the minimum 56 m2 MOE required amenity area protected from noise. 2.3 The subdivision agreement required the Owner to advise the purchasers of the 13 lots abutting Trulls Road "that in order to achieve acceptable noise attenuation levels . . . the outdoor amenity area is located in the front yard and /or veranda of the dwelling." The developer has recently confirmed that this did occur during closing of all the lots in question. 2.4 Conditions of draft approval required the recommendations of the noise report to be implemented; including the use of warning clauses registered on -title advising that sound levels from road traffic may interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupant. The developer was required to install 1.2 m high chain link fence abutting Trulls Road and to plant cedars having a minimum height of 1.8 metres. Furthermore, through the purchase and sale agreement, landowners were advised that they would be responsible for maintenance of the hedge. . ., REPORT MO.:' PSD-044-13 PAGE 3 2.5 The chain link fence installed by the developer is actually. 1.5 m tall and the cedars vary in height. The chain link fence and cedars were not intended to provide for noise attenuation, but rather delineate the property line and provide for a more natural screen to the rear yards. The cedars were planted late last fall and need time to flake root and fill out. Although that aspect of the subdivision has not been a formally accepted and put on maintenance, municipal staff have recently viewed the planted cedars and determined that they have been planted consistent with the approved plan. 2.6 Based on the 2009 noise study, should a fence be used to attenuate noise, the fence would need to be 2.75 m (9 ft) high to reduce rear yard noise levels to meet Ministry of Environment requirements. Approximately 210 metres offence would need to be constructed to cover the full length of the Trulls Road frontage, as well as wrap around sections to tie back into the dwellings at the corners. A 2.75 m tall noise fence is 0.6 to 0.95 m taller than typical noise fences and has an approximate cost of $375 per metre. Therefore to install noise fencing now Would cost in the range,of $80,000. In addition, there would be cost to removing the existing chain link fence. 2.7 The subdivision was approved with amenity areas in the front yard and /or veranda of the dwelling in compliance with Ministry of Environment criteria for noise. Based on the requirements of the subdivision agreement, the purchasers were advised that the front yard and /or veranda of the lot were providing amenity area. 3. CONCURRENCE — Not Applicable 4. -CONCLUSION 4.1 The purpose of this report is to provide background information on the noise issue identified by the residents through the petition. Based on the conditions of approval provided, staff recommends no further action be taken. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Carlo Pellarin Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: George Franklin Courtice Homestead Land Corp., •I Property Location Map (Courrrtioe) u Subject �J Sites Off Subject Site Al 3Courtice Homestead Subdivision S-C2007-0002 Lots requesting noise fence 1 m 0 D o 3 p CD %J � r Meeting GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 24, 2013 Resolution #: By-law : Report EGD- 021 -13 File #: r • °, Wrd 4 V_ � It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD- 021 -13 be received for information Submitted by: A. S. Cannella, C.E.T. Director of Engineering Services ASC /bb Reviewed by. C--� Franklin Wu Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623 -3379 F (905)623 -1824 REPORT 1 <- PAGE 2 ,� -, 1.1 With respect to the Building Permit Activity for the month of MAY 2013, Staff wish to highlight the following statistics for the information of Committee and Council. 2013 1 2012 BUILDING CATEGORY 2013 2012 NUMBER OF PERMITS BUILDING CATEGORY NUMBER OF PERMITS VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF PERMITS VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION % CHANGE OF VALUE 2013 -2012 Residential 56 $8,329,176 76 $15,650,197 - 46.8% Industrial 2 $1,905,000 2 $762,500 149.8% Government 0 $0 0 $0 N/A Commercial 6 $1,521,000 6 $525,600 189.4% Institutional 2 $602,300 0 $0 N/A Agricultural 4 $318,732 1 $42,000 658.9% Demolition 6 $0 4 $0 N/A TOTAL 76 $12,676,208 89 $16,980,297 2013 1 2012 BUILDING CATEGORY NUMBER OF PERMITS VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF PERMITS VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION % CHANGE OF VALUE 2013 -2012 Residential 270 $40,020,638 315 $71,683,189 - 44.2% Industrial 12 $11,359,090 5 $5,078,360 123.7% Government 0 $0 2 $25,442 N/A Commercial 25 $14,110,880 16 $3,482,500 305.2% Institutional 8 $682,300 3 $3,411,625 - 80.0% Agricultural 6 $388,732 8 $431,978 - 10.0% Demolition 25 $0 37 $0 N/A TOTAL 346 $66,561,640 386 $84,113,094 - 20.9% AM 1`1121-4001 ilia Z riiii'mZeT1713WRIF 1.2 With respect to building permit activities (over $250,000) and large residential building permit activities, the details are provided as follows: Owner / Applicant Construction Type Location Value 2316057 ONTARIO LTD. Car Dealership (Nissan) 23 Spicer Square, Bowmanville $1,400,000 KAWARTHA PINE RIDGE Addition to John M 175 Mearns Avenue, Bowmanville $ 307,800 DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD James Public School KAWARTHA PINE RIDGE Addition to Dr Ross 45 West Side Drive, Bowmanville $ 294,500 DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Tilley Public School REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY Energy from Waste 72 Osborne Road, Courtice $1,065,000 OF DURHAM Facility Foundation (Grizzly Building /Conveyor Enclosure ) ONTARIO POWER Platforms for Mock -Up 5 Energy Drive, Darlington $ 840,000 GENERATION Facility REPORT NO.: EGD- 021 -13 IMAGE 4 The following is a comparison of the types of dwelling units issued for the month of "MAY" and "YEAR TO DATE ". 0 Semi- Detached 0% Dwelling Unit Type "MAY" 2013 _... 4 0 Apartment 0% t-'Single Detached 21 t-? Sem i- Detached 0 a Townhouse 4 Apartment0 L tt S r 21 Single Detach ed 84% Dwelling Unit Type "YEAR TO DATE 2013" 6 Apartment 4% Townhouse 19% L� Z 1; `•, 61 t, r Single 7` Detached 42% 50 Single Detached 61 Semi - Detached t Semi - Detached 50 35% luTownhouse27 Apartment6 The following is a historical comparison of the building permits issued for the month of "MAY" and "YEAR TO DATE" for a three year period. Historical Data for Month of "MAY" $50,00 111 - $45,00 -- a 111 - $40,00 -- 111-- $35,00 111 - $30,00 -- 111 - $25,00 111 � $20,00 ■ �■ ■ ■ $15,00 $10,00 $5,00 y � N - - 111 - - - -- a 111 - -- 111-- 111 - - - -- 111 - -- 111 � ��■ ■ ■ �■ ■ ■ ■ ■ _ ■ $10,000,000 2013 2012 2011 Value $66,561,640 $84,113,094 $82,405,152 REPORT NO.: '1 9 -5 2013 2012 May Year to Date May Year to Date Building Inspections 617 2,794 823 3,121 Plumbing & Heating Inspections 787 3,659 833 3,582 Pool Enclosure Inspections 43 51 12 14 TOTAL 1,447 1 6,504 1,668 6,717 9 -5 '2013 2012 May Year to Date May Year to Date Single Detached 21 61 44 184 Semi - Detached 0 50 2 12 Townhouse 4 27 0 19 Apartments 0 6 1 4 TOTAL 25 144 47 219 9 -5 r YEAR: AREA 2013 (to end of May) 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 Bowmanville 73 291 360 282 98 340 451 609 307 587 468 Courtice 35 179 312 236 113 134 82 126 241 173 180 Newcastle 27 34 165 37 24 60 77 84 202 191 123 Wilmot Creek 0 2 5 8 9 30 16 15 15 25 29 Orono 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 Darlington 3 6 5 8 6 10 6 7 14 15 13 Clarke 3 10 8 6 11 5 11 12 13 10 ' 16 Burketon 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Enfield 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Enniskillen 0 3 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 Hampton 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 Haydon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kendal 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Kirby 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leskard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maple Grove 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Mitchell Corners 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Newtonville 2 6 3 7 5 7 2 2 4 5 3 Solina 0 3 1 1 5 0 6 3 3 3 3 Tyrone 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 TOTALS 144 537 863 593 274 593 655 1 861 802 1,015. 843 M-1 RM 2. CONCURRENCE -Not Applicable CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN Not Applicable Staff Contact: Rick Pigeon, Chief Building Official 9 -7 Date: June 24, 2013 Resolution #: By-law #: Report#: EGD- 022 -13 File #: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD- 022 -13 be received; 2. THAT Council pass By -Law No. 2013 -_ to amend Schedule `A' of By -Law 2006- 105 (being a by -law to regulate the construction of driveway entrances upon highways under the jurisdiction of the Municipality of Clarington) to address cost recovery for the construction of entrances in the Municipality; and 3. THAT all interested parties listed in Report EGD- 022 -13 be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Submitted by: ASC /LJB /dv June 5, 2013 A. . Cannella, C.E.T. Director of Engineering Service 5rvaTh, B.A., R.D. .R., R.R.F.A Director of Operations Reviewed by: 6 Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 -623 -3379 ._i '' 1.1 The Municipality's By -Law No. 2006 -105 regulates the construction of driveway entrances onto the highways under the jurisdiction of the Municipality. The Municipality has been regulating access onto Municipal roads since 1981. The By- Law ensures that entrances from private property onto Clarington roads are constructed in a safe location and to municipal standards. Property owners shall apply for an entrance when: -The use of the entrance changes from temporary to permanent -A new building is to be constructed on vacant land -An entrance is desired to vacant property where no entrance exists -An existing land use changes to another land use -A temporary access is required 1.2 Entrance applications are jointly processed by both the Engineering Department and the Operations Department. Engineering is involved in the technical process of assessing sight lines, ensuring compliance with zoning and site plans and ensuring that an on- street parking spot is not lost (in the case of applications to widen a driveway). The Operations Department physically inspects the site to ensure that field conditions meet Clarington's policy for entrances and checks sightlines and clearances for utilities. In rural areas, Operations determines culvert sizing based on water flows in the area and known history for flooding issues. In the case that an entrance requires a culvert size larger than Council approved pricing , Operations will provide a cost estimate to the owner and schedule the work to be completed following payment. In the case of urban entrances, the Municipality contracts for curb cutting services. ItIiZK91,1i7 2.1 Schedule `A' of the By -Law provides for cost recovery to the Municipality. The fee schedule outlined in Schedule 'A' of the existing By -Law is seven years old, and staff recommend that the by -law be amended to ensure full cost recovery for both rural and urban entrances. =1 • • 1 .. 2.2 The following changes are proposed to the fee schedule (including HST): Inspection Fee $50.00 currently $75.00 proposed 400mm X 7m culvert $1400.00 currently Scu o $1800.00 proposed 450mm x 7m culvert $1400.00 plus actual cost difference between 400mm culvert and 450mm culvert currently $1900.00 proposed 600mm x 7m culvert $1400.00 plus actual cost difference between 400mm culvert and 450mm culvert currently $2000.00 proposed Curb cut $25/m currently $30 /m proposed These proposed fees are for cost recovery for the culvert, granular material, lead hand, flag persons, Y2 ton trucks, gradall and operators, tandem trucks and operators and administration. 3.1 Recent enquiries regarding fees for culvert installation revealed the following: Port Hope $200.00 inspection fee $1200.00 installation fee for 450 mm x 7 m culvert Scu o $2000.00 for up to 450 mm x 7 m culvert Oshawa -no standard fee - individually priced by supervisors - average cost $2500.00 for 400 mm x 7m culvert Durham Region $3400.00 for 450 mm x 7 m culvert 3.2 The increases proposed in this report are considered by staff to be reasonable and are proposed only for reasons of full cost recovery. 4.1 Staff recommend that the fees for culvert installation and curb cut services outlined in Attachment 1 be approved and that Schedule 'A' of By -Law 2006 -105 be amended to, reflect the proposed fees. .1"M 5.0 CONCURRENCE —Not applicable CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN Al. The recommendations contained. in this report conform to the general intent of the following priorities of the Strategic Plan: (Place an "X" in the box for all that apply) Promoting economic development X Maintaining financial stability Connecting Clarington Promoting green initiatives Investing in infrastructure Showcasing our community Not in conformity with Strategic Plan Staff Contact: Leslie J. Benson, Transportation & Design Manager Attachments: Attachment 1 - Schedule "A" List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Not applicable 9 -11 Al" T AGI'AMENT NO. -1 Notes: All "Time and materials + 35 %" works will be'estimated by the Director of Operations or his designated representative. The estimated sum must be paid to the Municipality prior to the approval of the Application for Property Access and or the commencement of works. 9 -12 DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TYPE PAYABLE TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Inspection Fee $75.00 1. 7m — 400mm pipe (replacing 15" x $1800.00 24' 2. 7m — 450 mm pipe (replacing 18" x $1900.00 24' 3. 7 m — 600 mm pipe (replacing 24" x $2000.00 24' 4. Entrance — no culvert Time and materials + 35% (minimum charge $200.00 5. Entrance — Extension Time and materials + 35% (minimum charge $200.00 6. Entrance — Relocation Time and materials + 35% (minimum charge $200.00 7. Entrance — Temporary Time and materials + 35% (minimum charge $200.00) 8. Curb cutting $30.00 /m minimum charge $125.00 per cut Notes: All "Time and materials + 35 %" works will be'estimated by the Director of Operations or his designated representative. The estimated sum must be paid to the Municipality prior to the approval of the Application for Property Access and or the commencement of works. 9 -12 Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 24, 2013 Resolution: By-law: Report#: EGD- 023 -13 File #: Subject: PROPOSAL TO CLOSE AND CONVEY TWO ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAYS SITUATED IN LOT 17 CONCESSION 2, FORME- .... • OF DARLINGTON (Hr °•. I�x•�•TI�I1�1I��I�7_��C�71�[� It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD- 023 -13 be received; 2. THAT Council approve in principle the closure and conveyance of two adjoining unopen right -of -ways being two lanes created by Plan H50066 and Plan H50067 situated in Lot 17, Concession 2, former Darlington Township (Hampton); 3. THAT the applicant pay all advertising, legal, appraisal and land costs associated with this transaction; and 4. THAT 562503 Ontario Limited and Honey Harbour Estates Ltd. be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: ASC /LJB /dv �P Reviewed by: A.S. Cannella, C.E.T. Director, Engineering Services 0 Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 9 -13 M091 1 0XIMNN 1.1 562503 Ontario Limited and Honey Harbour Estates Ltd. are the owners of lands situated on both sides of two adjoining municipal right -of -ways in Lot 17 Concession 5, former Township of Darlington; specifically, running north and west from Ormiston Street in Hampton (see Attachment 1). The north -south right -of -way is approximately Urn x 523m. The adjoining east -west right -of -way is approximately 5m x 150m. These right -of -ways were lanes created by Plan H50066 and Plan H50067, but the lanes were never opened nor used for Municipal purposes. 1.2 In 2010, Clarington Council approved an Official Plan Amendment and a Rezoning to the then -owner of the lands in order to allow for the future development of eight residential lots. In September 2012, the owner applied to Durham Region to sever the lands into eight lots, retained lands and opens space (to be retained by the owner). The Municipality required (among other things) that the applicant apply to Clarington to close and convey the unopen right -of -ways since the Director has determined that the right -of -ways are unlikely to be required for municipal purposes. The closure and conveyance would eliminate the existence of the unmaintained municipal lands which would be added to two residential lots and the open space. 1.3 An application has been received to close and convey these right -of -ways, and the applicable application fee has been received. 2.1 In accordance with the Municipality's Policy and Procedure for Road Closures, in addition to the submission of the application and the payment of the application fee, the following procedure must occur: • Council must approve, in principle, the closure and conveyance. • The applicant must pay all legal and appraisal fees. • The applicant must submit the written consent of the abutting property owners (none in the case). • Staff must circulate the application to all Clarington departments, Durham Region, agencies, utilities, Conservation Authority and all other authorities in the Policy's circulation list. • The applicant must submit an R -Plan for the right -of -ways which are to be closed and conveyed. • The Municipality will retain a qualified land appraiser to conduct the appraisal and provide a report. • The applicant must pay the appraised value of the land to the Municipality. • A public Notice must be advertised which outlines Council's intention to close the right -of -ways. • Council must give final approval of the closure and conveyance, and pass the necessary by -law to authorize the Municipal Solicitor to finalize the transaction. 9 -14 141e7 :% 9 r 1 [9 m;[ rl 9a I y_. � N E c 1 ■ 3.0 CONCURRENCE - all Municipal Departments through the circulation process. 4.1 The Director of Engineering Services has required, through the application for severance, that 562503 Ontario Limited and Honey Harbour Estates Ltd. apply to close and convey the unopened right -of -ways currently situated in their lands. The applicant has paid, or will pay prior to processing their application, all fees required to proceed with the application. The applicant will be supplied with a copy of the appraisal report for the lands, and the value of the lands must be paid to the Municipality prior to any further action. Subsequent to the receipt of the payment for lands, a final report to Council will be prepared for its approval of the closure and conveyance of the two adjoining right -of -ways and for the passing of the necessary by -law. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Leslie J. Benson, Development Engineering Traffic Manager Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map and Location Plan List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: 562503 Ontario Limited and Honey Harbour Estates Ltd. 9 -15 Date: June 24, 2013 Resolution #: By-law #: Report #: EGD -024 -013 Flle #: Subject: PROPOSAL TO CLOSE AND CONVEY A PORTION OF A ROAD ALLOWANCI (MCKNIGHT ROAD) SITUATED BETWEEN L'E'TS 26 0,27, CONCESSION FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON * It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD- 024 -13 be received; 2. THAT Council approve in principle the closure and conveyance of McKnight Road from the south side of Courtice Court to the south end at Highway 401; 3. THAT the applicant pay all advertising, legal, appraisal and land costs associated with this transaction; and 4. THAT Waste Management of Canada Corporation be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Reviewed by: A.S..Cannella, C.E.T. Franklin Wu, Director of Engineering Chief Administrative Officer Services ASC /LJB /dv June 12, 2013 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 �Ilaiw _ I wt 1.1 Earlier this year, a representative of Waste Management of Canada Corporation (WMCC) contacted municipal staff with respect to the potential closure and conveyance of an open portion of McKnight Road from the south side of Courtice Court south to the dead end at Highway 401. The road is approximately 20m X 200m (see Attachment 1). WMCC lands are located on the east side of the subject road which only serves those lands. Vacant lands on the west side of McKnight Road were created through severance applications. There is a 0.3m reserve along the frontage of the lands on the west side of McKnight Road as there was never any intention of the Municipality to permit access to these lands off McKnight Road: only Courtice Court. 1.2 WMCC has applied to close and convey the road allowance in light of the recent expropriation notice from MTO for a portion of WMCC'S lands (see Attachment 2) which are required for the construction of the Highway 407 East Durham Link. The expropriation will necessitate the relocation of the weigh scales which are located on the south side of the transfer station (see Attachment 2). A representative of WMCC has stated that there is not sufficient area on site to relocate the scales due to turning movements required for incoming and exiting trucks (some as long as 60ft). WMCC proposes to locate the scales on the road allowance at the south end which will weigh loads prior to trucks making a. left turn into the WMCC property to access the transfer station. 1.3 The Director of Engineering Services has determined that this portion of McKnight Road is not required to be maintained as part of the Municipality's road network as it only serves one property: the applicant. 2.1 In accordance with the Municipality's Policy and Procedure for Road Closures, in addition to the submission of the application and the payment of the application fee, the following procedure must occur: • Council must approve, in principle, the closure and conveyance. • The applicant must pay all legal and appraisal fees. • The applicant must submit the written consent of the abutting property owners (none in this case.) • Staff must circulate the application to all Clarington departments, Durham Region, agencies, utilities, Conservation Authority and all other authorities in the Policy's circulation list. • The applicant must submit an R -Plan for the road allowance which is to be closed and conveyed. Y _; • The Municipality will retain a qualified land appraiser to conduct the appraisal and provide a report. • A Public Notice must be advertised which outlines Council's intention to close the right -of -ways. • The applicant must pay the appraised value of the land to the Municipality. • Council must give final approval of the closure and conveyance, and pass the necessary by -law to allow the Municipal Solicitor to finalize the transaction. 3.0 CONCURRENCE - all departments through the circulation process This report has been reviewed by the Director of Operations who concurs with the recommendations. 4.1 As a consequence of an MTO notice of expropriation for the construction of a portion of the Highway 407 East Durham Link, WMCC has applied to close and convey that portion of McKnight Road from the south side of Courtice Court to the dead end at Highway 401 in order to relocate their weigh scales. The Director of Engineering Services has determined that this portion of McKnight Road is not required to be maintained as part of the Municipality's road network. Staff, therefore, recommend that Council approve, in principle, the closure and conveyance of this portion of McKnight Road to Waste Management Canada Corporation and authorize staff to process the application. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Leslie J, Benson, Development Engineering. and Traffic Manager Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map and Location Plan Attachment 2 - WMCC Lands Subject to Expropriation List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Waste Management Canada Corporation, George Field =111 P11 Baseline Road 0 Courtice Court WASTE MANAGEMENT....::' :': :: ....CANADA. CORPORA TI®l it ;':':':'r :'•::':: : 0.30m RESERVE TO EE :'.CONVEYS ®':',:':r; :,r•:'.r',•:r'::.r: r "IghwaY 409 DRAWN BY: E.L. DATE: June 12, 2013 REPORT EGD- 024-13 KEY MAP ATTACHMENT NO. 1 G:1Attachments\McKnight Road Closure.mxd - -- _ '+ry- _ ��' ? " P a, 7 F' �� `S r�, I '• f�„ � i ,j'I : _r, � � r' ... .. - - I r�,4,�,, �^,7+�'.eF�� r w'?' �' ''Y-,"R,r}o r� �' � r r. i. Y•5: q ,...�wr,.,l, is �'�: . {.;� � " `" ,�.�✓$ �� ,� �r:ai .. ... ti � '�"•+r � �.'iA","' c •+;. �', i, ,.::,,. •':vj��,,,4'•?..l".)q,. ..�_. '.., :�+5 �� 1. tia %+''� .. `�J :a � :,n: : -: .f �, � .. ... +'�i� t ,Tyr�'tir ;r . � � �' �ru.1"�`''f,'r"'`.. - - ,. - 4k n' �"?• ! 7.�"t�'`,.'k .':7 , r t.' rl% .M"f"r -. r . V ',` a, ri ! _ � .. tx� A �..✓'�' : _ '��1 "„ fwd L`Y7 _ ��' � ,F� � _ 4 _ _ "rI!+v. 1i- �^.�tF[, _.. ' 4t' fiz3 �.�".�'a `yi �'L fj��?�.;L!,T.rp� '� •� r }�. "��...`, ..'� tf"n4y,, _ L• Y, ,�G,S �:.,� .i S'• r �_ r;:r'il' - ,' •' .. �,'C` 'ta. ry w � s r C $w `.� r - - : � f,. ai '� +'��' f �.��1rr.l - - • .. I.y„riY y ' fi't Jt. F - EL ROA 7 k r d ti d j t � Ry � w V y Aia F Ar 4�� • � �- r 7� :.. ti• k -. ,ri�,ra,��yn�JN* r"? � ,...:�+�}��AI�7C8"I a7`iY1LCaS e r - _ .nrt'". co °- rF d • �: e. .: .. .' °n Rya' :-;,:: ., r .• .'M .. . - - 'J - - .. }'.. - , - -.� -_ . -,r. _ - _ � 4.a .- � � - �a .:T a ��' � tu: = •,�' ..3 f is . Legend Waste Management Canada Corp. .2 Highway 407 Corridor DRAW BY. C.L: DAiE. JJU 20 CO _ � I' REPOM f��/?? 1® °'�_`1 13 If'�iEh�OtIO � E- `G (32 � u 3 ENERGY DRIVE " V VG � F uV�� uN0.t W1 ff, rilt � Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COM Date: June 24, 2013 • It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: THAT Report EGD- 025 -13 be received for information. Submitted by: ASC /RA/jb /dv Reviewed by: A.S. Cannella, C.E.T. Director of Engineering Services Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 9 -22 REPORT O.: D- 025 -13 PAGE 2 1. INTRODUCTION To serve Council in their understanding of our projects, we have decided that going forward we will provide a full up -date twice per year in June and then again in December /January, which lists our programs and provides a description and status update. Certainly we encourage you to review our reports and contact us with any questions you may have. To begin, it should be understood that 2013 is an exceptional year in its size and scope, specifically because of the timing of some major, one -time projects and also because we were able to partner with other funding sources, (ie. The Region), where that partnership provided an exceptional opportunity to realize significant financial benefit for the Municipality. As part of our twice yearly report we will also provide- Council with details of our involvement in other projects, which while not a part of our Capital Budget program, do require our input and expertise. Residential and non - residential development proposals, major projects undertaken by external agencies that affect our infrastructure, as well as programs managed by other Municipal Departments, all require significant staff an input and support. A brief discussion of all projects will be presented in our bi- annual reports. To begin we would like to identify the major projects that will be undertaken in 2013. Some will be major Clarington projects and others will be major projects managed by external agencies /developers within Clarington's boundaries. We outline Clarington's projects below: Bridge Green Road CP Rail and Green Road Construction from Boswell Drive to Aspen Springs Drive This project has been identified as a key transportation network link for some time. Work will involve constructing Green Road from Aspen Springs Drive to Boswell Drive, building a temporary rail diversion and replacing the existing railway bridge with a larger bridge to accommodate the future ultimate 4 lane cross of Green Road including sidewalks. This project is very complex and requires a high degree of co- ordination with the Canadian Pacific Railway. The project is estimated to start construction this fall and be completed in the fall of 2014. The estimated project cost is $8,000,000. Once completed this road will provide for a much needed improved grid road network system for the west part of Bowmanville. mmw Identified in the Municipality's Strategic Plan as a high priority to open up the waterfront to public, the development of the Port Darlington East Beach was approved in the 2013 Capital budget. In order to provide the space with better function we will be relocating a portion of East Beach Road which will lie within the park north roughly 50 m as well as closing the south portion of Port Darlington Road for the same length. The works will also include erosion protection of the bluff from the park's eastern limits to the existing beach to the west, construction of a splash pad, walkways, play structure, waterfront trail and public washroom building. The park is in the final design stage and we will commence construction this summer. The majority of the work will be finished by the end of this year with final landscaping being completed in the spring of 2014. The park will be open for use in the summer of 2014. The estimated cost of this project is $3,000,000. Through the public consultation and site review process staff determined that the preferred location for this site was at our South Courtice Community Park on the east side of Prestonvale Road south of Bloor Street. Through consultation with user groups and the trend of playing seasons starting earlier and ending later in the year staff determined that there was a need to include an artificial turf field to our inventory of sports fields. This premier venue will allow for practice and play outdoors for longer periods during the year and would be available for play regardless of weather conditions. The provision of this field will also help preserve the conditions of our natural turf fields that are currently being extensively used. The detailed design for this field is being finalized and it is anticipated that construction will begin this summer and be completed in November of 2013. The estimated cost of this project is $1,500,000. In addition to dealing with our own Capital Works program the Engineering Services department also provides input into other major initiatives that are undertaken but other external agencies or large developments. We get involved in order to protect our short and long term interests and to ensure that our vision for the Municipality is not negatively impacted by these major projects. Energy Drive — Courtice Road to Osborne Road, Clarington Energy Businesm Park I The $7M construction of Energy Drive, realignment of Courtice Road and Darlington Park Road in association with the servicing requirements for the York Durham Energy Centre is another major project that we have been involved with over the past year. Staff has provided design review to ensure that our standards and specifications are met. This road and associated storm water conveyance system will become Clarington's infrastructure once the works are completed by 9 -24 the Region of Durham and accepted by the Municipality of Clarington. Work is scheduled to start in the fall of 2013 with completion in 2014. Port Associated This project has been ongoing for some time now and over the last year we have seen the road improvements required to support this large initiative by the Government of Canada completed. Engineering, Planning and Legal staff provided extensive input into the final design and specifications for the construction of Elliott Road including level crossing improvements at the CNR, rehabilitation of Newtonville Road, Concession Road , all of which were completed in 2012 and are in use for the project now. Currently staff are working with Canada to finalize the Lakeshore Road realignment and underpass construction which is anticipated to go out for tender later this year with construction carrying over into 2014. In order to prepare for the upcoming refurbishment of the Darlington Nuclear Station, OPG, in cooperation with the Ministry of Transportation, will be replacing the existing partial interchange at Holt Road with a full movement (access to and from Hwy. 401 in all directions) interchange including a roundabout design to eliminate the need for signalization. This work will also incorporate the relocation of South Service Road and portions of the waterfront trail between Holt Road and Solina Road. All of this work is required to accommodate the expected traffic associated with the refurbishment as well as potential future demands associated with New Build should it move forward. The road and bridge work is in the detailed design stage and construction is anticipated to be completed by 2016. Staff are working with OPG and Ministry staff to ensure our needs are met on the relocated roads and waterfront trail. In addition to providing a benefit to the future Darlington Nuclear Station improvements it will also improve access to and from Hwy. 401 for the residents of Clarington. Highway 401 Corridor Studies - 1) Brock Road to Courtice Road & 2) Courtice Road to East Townline Both of these projects being undertaken by M.T.O. are on -going and staff in cooperation with Region of Durham staff have been involved in providing input and critical review for both of these studies. It is expected that the Ministry will being completing the Courtice Road to East Townline Study in the near future with the other corridor study being completed late this year. There have been and continue to be some challenges in dealing with Ministry staff in accepting some of the input we have provided, specifically including the future Lambs Road interchange as part of their Environmental Assessment when reviewing options and impacts for the project. Both Durham Region staff and Clarington staff have voiced this concern but with no positive response from the Ministry. Staff will continue to follow up on this matter and press to have the issue addressed. 9 -25 Highway 407 East Extension - Phase I to Harmony Road ani Phase and Taunton to Hwy. 401 Although Phase 1 of this project does not occur in Clarington, staff have argued that Clarington roads will be negatively impacted by the phasing of the project which staff have recently, reported on to Council. We will continue to collect traffic data on our roads in order to be able to track anticipated impacts once Phase 1 of the 407 East extension is completed to Harmony Road. The Ministry of Transportation is starting to move forward with the detailed design of Phase 2, which is almost entirely in Clarington, and is anticipated that construction could start in 2015 with the extension planned for full operation in 2020. As design plans are developed Clarington staff will provide input on our required design standards, special requirements for cycling and pedestrians, review of impacts of construction and operation on our road network. It will be important for staff to ensure that the phased approach proposed by M.T.O. does not put an undue burden on the Municipality of Clarington from both a liability or fiscal perspective. Although Metrolinx has pushed back the timelines for the completion of this work, which is now in their "Next Wave" list of projects, staff still continue to be a part of the municipal consultation process that Metolinx has set up. In addition staff have taken into consideration the future needs of the Rail Extension project when designing the works for the Green Road rail bridge and roadway. We will continue to participate in this working group and provide Council with updates as they become available. Another critical and time consuming function that Engineering Services staff provides is input and review of development proposals ranging from individual lot severances to large scale site developments including both residential and non- residential applications. To date in 2013 Engineering. staff have provided input on: ® 22 Preconsultations for potential development proposals ® 14 Site plan applications ® 15 rezonings /Official Plan amendments ® 1 Plan of Subdivision ® 1 Condominium application; and ® 25 Land divisions. 9_26 The input staff provides ensures that either operational or infrastructure impacts created by these development applications are identified as being addressed through the process, that future infrastructure needs are not compromised and our engineering standards and specifications are met. The above review is in addition to the review of detailed design submissions for previously approved residential subdivisions and construction inspection of the same which also adds $9,000,000 to $10,000,000 of infrastructure to the Municipality of Clarington's inventory annually. In addition to managing the Engineering Services Capital Budget projects our department also provides technical and project management expertise to other departments in the form of detailed design, tender preparation and contract administration. These projects range in scope from sidewalk bay replacements at our facilities to road and watermain design to support the development of a new fire hall in Newcastle and everything inbetween. The following is a summary of some of the more notable projects that we have worked on over the last year and their status: ® Level Crosssing Surface improvements at Riley Road and Metcalf Road (Operations Dept., Status: Design Complete, awaiting approval from CNR) ® Glennabbey Drive Retaining Wall Rehabilitation (Operations Dept., Status: Preliminary design stage) ® Sidewalk Inspection (Trip Hazards), Inventory and Tender Preparation (Operations Dept., Status: Inspections 95% complete, preparation of sidewalk replace, grinding, mud jacking and interlocking brick contracts underway) ® Orono Library Parking Lot and Walkway (Operations Dept., Status: Design and Construction Summer 2013) ® Urban Street Tree Inventory (Operations Dept., Status: In progress, anticipate inventorying 10,000+ trees to assist with maintenance program) ® Newcastle Fire Hall Road Widening and watermain extension. (Emergency Services Dept., Design and Tender Complete, awaiting final approval from Region of Durham) ® Garnett B. Rickard Emergency Exit Staircases (Community Services Dept., Status: Complete) 9 -27 - -' The Engineering Services Department would like to continue and expand the range services we provide and do more if we have the available resources to do so. In addition to the $12.5M included in the 2013 Capital Budget for the special projects noted earlier, the remaining $8.39M in the Capital Budget includes for many of the routine but essential works that Engineering Services is responsible for in order to ensure that our infrastructure is maintained and improved in a safe and sustainable manner. This work includes but is not limited to sidewalk replacements and extension, road rehabilitation and reconstruction, bridge and culvert rehabilitation and replacement, street lighting enhancements and many others. A summary of the Construction Projects which Engineering Services will be managing in 2013 for both our department and others is provided for on Attachment No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in both table and map format. 7. CONCURRENCE — Not applicable Although the 2013 is proving to be an exceptional year as it pertains to projects in the Municipality of Clarington, Engineering Services staff are managing to get the projects to construction while still providing the necessary support required of the department to facilitate the continued growth of the Municipality of Clarington. As we move forward in the near future, the department will continue the trend of undertaking additional design and construction administration while assisting other Departments. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN The recommendations contained in this report conform to the general intent of the following priorities of the Strategic Plan: Promoting economic development X Maintaining financial stability Connecting Clarington Promoting green initiatives X Investing in infrastructure Showcasing our community Not in conformity with Strategic Plan am Staff Contact: Ron Albright, Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Works Attachments: Attachment 1 — List of 2013 Construction Projects Attachment 2 — Map 1 of 2013 Construction Projects Attachment 3 — Map 2 of 2013 Construction Projects Attachment 4 — Map 3 of 2013 Construction Projects Attachment 5 — Map 4 of 2013 Construction Projects List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: None 9 -29 ', Municipality of Clarington 2013 Construction Projects Attacment No. 1 to Report EGD- 025 -13 Ref # raJt ........... ............................... ...................................:................:::.................#?.......................:........................... pes�ri fr,t��E 3mifs of 1tltrk ..:...:........:............ ............................... ............................... •............ •....... Seltul.......:.:... Street Lights 1 Intersection Lighting Intersection lighting and infill of dark spots at various locations, May 2013 2 Walkway Lighting East side of RR 57 from Baseline Road to Waverley Road and from John Scott Court to RR 57 June 2013 3 Osborne Road South Service Road to south limit August 2013 4 Energy Drive Osborne Road to east limit 5 Rotary Park Improvements to lighting July - August 2013 Parks 6 Longworth Park Phase 2 Expansion of park at Longworth Avenue east of Swindells Street including water play area July - October 2013 7 Tooley's Mill Park New park at Farewell Creek south of Highway 2 in Courtice July - October 2013 8 Artificial Turf Sports Field New artificial turf sports field behind the South Courtice Sports Complex including expansion of parking lot July October 2013 9 Port Darlington Waterfront Park East Beach Phase 1 Re- alignment of East Beach Road, shoreline protection and installation of park features such as splash pad, waterfront trail, and parking lots. July 2013 to Spring 2014 10 Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Trail Improvement Alignment improvements at Toronto Street in Newcastle Summer 2013 Bridges and Culverts 11 Green Road Grade Separation 100 m north of Aspen Springs Drive - Replace and upgrade bridge under railway Fall 2013 to Fall 2014 12 Mearns Avenue 400 m north of Concession Road 4 - Re -line culvert August 2013 13 Old Scugog Road 200 m south of Concession Road 9 - Replace concrete bridge July - August 2013 14 Peters Pike 20 m south of RR 4 - Replace culvert July - August 2013 15 Bragg Road 350 m north of Concession Street East - Repair concrete bridge July - August 2013 Pavement Rehabilitation 16 Sunset Road Vanstone Court to 40 m south 17 Apple Blossom Boulevard Tucker Road to Glanville Crescent 18 Mann Street At Herriman Street intersection 19 Black Ck Trail, Windsor Valley Gate, Carriage Lane, & Windsor Valley Place Full length 20 Old Scugog Road RR 57 to Concession Road 4 May - November 2013 21 Mearns Avenue King Street to Concession Street East 22 Concession Road 3 At Liberty Street intersection 23 Concession Road 10 RR 20 to Mosport Road 24 Mosport Road Concession Road 10 to RR 20 25 Highway 2 Widening Addition of turn lanes at new Fire Hall west of Rudell Road in Newcastle June - July 2013 Surface Asphalt 26 Stevens Road Green Road to RR 57 27 High Street First Street to Fourth Street 28 First Street Elgin Street to High Street 29 Third Street Elgin Street to High Street July - October 2013 30 Fourth Street Elgin Street to High Street 31 Baseline Road Darlington Creek to West Side Drive 32 Green Road Highway 2 to Stevens Road Roadside Protection (Guide Rail) Roadside Protection Program Installation of new steel beam guide rail - locations to be determined Fall 2013 to Fall 2014 9 -30 Municipality of Clarington 2013 Construction Projects Attacment No. 1 to Report EGD- 026.13 9 -31 ...... Sctledu [�::::::::;:::::::..::.:_::: Road Reconstruction 33 Duke Street Nelson Street to Argyle Street 34 Nelson Street Hunt Street to Ontario Street May - October 2013 35 Green Road Aspen Springs Drive to Boswell Drive Fall 2013 to Fall 2014 36 Wilmot Street North Street to Mill Street Fall 2013 37 Trulls Road George Reynolds Drive to Billett Gate Fall 2013 38 Given Road King Avenue to new cul -de -sac 150 m west of King Avenue Fall 2013 Railways Railway Level Crossing Safety Improvements Various locations - Signage, painting, minor surface adjustments and brush clearing July - November 2013 39 Metcalf Street / CNR Level Crossing Improvements Re- paving on each side of the crossing Summer 2013 40 Riley Road / CNR Level Crossing, Improvements Profile improvements and re- paving on each side of the crossing Summer 2013 Other 41 Energy Drive Streetscaping Osborne Road to east limit Summer 2013 42 Glenabby Drive Retaining Wall Remove and replace existing retaining wall at Townline Road Summer 2013 43 Orono Library Parking Lot Paving of existing parking lot Summer 2013 44 Trulls Road Ditching Billett Gate to Pebblestone Road - West side Fall 2013 Bike Lane Painting Various locations -to be determined Summer 2013 Sidewalks Sidewalk Replacement - Unspecified Remove and replace sidewalk at various locations 45 Courtice West Park Walkway Remove and replace asphalt walkway 46 Baseline Road New sidewalk - Simpson Avenue to Mearns Avenue - North side 47 Pethick Street New sidewalk - Prince William Boulevard to Highway 2 -West side July - October 2013 48 Trulls Road New sidewalk - Nash Road to George Reynolds Drive - East side Connections to Transit Stops New sidewalk at various locations to complete links between transit stops and existing sidewalk network 49 Osborne Road New sidewalk - Energy Drive to south limit of OPG property - East sid August 2013 50 Energy Drive New sidewalk - Osborne Road to east limit - South side 51 Courtice Road Moyse Drive to Nash Road - East Side August 2013 Traffic Signals 52 Longworth Ave Intersection Pedestrian Signal Brooking Street intersection August 2013 Erosion Control 53 Bowmanville Creek Erosion Control Jackman Road bridge - new armour stone and crib wall upstream of bridge July - August 2013 9 -31 Attachment 2 to EGD- 025 -13 c / z 35 31 33 32 31 30 291 2a 271 26 251 24 231 22 211 20 191 19\ 171 16 151 14 131 12 11 °1 10 9 1 6 7 1 6 5 1 4 3 1 2 LOT w I_ E.- ...z.— pp z i EI g ! CUNCE IoNPOAD z i `{ 1 X (� � n :� 35 34 33 32 311 30 291 28 271 26 251 21 23 COI - .� - ... E .: bao •' I a :V : E ' '{ I E Ea ..__.._ . . .. .:.......... .aS....�•- .-- �. - -... I Z O W zU O U Z O tNn W U Z O U N 2 vj U (' ZO U u _ EI 1 (.EE R ATTACHMENT No. No. 2 TO EGD- 025.13 1 l 2013 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (RURAL AREA) Lighting — Road Reconstruction Road Surface Asphalt Parking Lot 0 Erosion Control Works Road Rehabilitation seso • Road Ditching Works Structures (Bridges, Culverts) Q Parks 6 Related Inirastrw New Sidewalk Retaining Wall ........ Streetscape Works -- -- - - Regional Jurisdiction Roa WORKS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PUBLISHED DATE: J— 10, 2013 z S. It1IU Uke Ontarlo i �lar.�tg�on LenAing !Ge il'ay_- 0-32 Ge weasm]t]rpvaWj VOU CmWtcran,�tlkGUU 11•Vre.- EODz]]�]_ _____— ____ 17 R '%x I i l 2013 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (RURAL AREA) Lighting — Road Reconstruction Road Surface Asphalt Parking Lot 0 Erosion Control Works Road Rehabilitation seso • Road Ditching Works Structures (Bridges, Culverts) Q Parks 6 Related Inirastrw New Sidewalk Retaining Wall ........ Streetscape Works -- -- - - Regional Jurisdiction Roa WORKS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PUBLISHED DATE: J— 10, 2013 z S. It1IU Uke Ontarlo i �lar.�tg�on LenAing !Ge il'ay_- 0-32 Ge weasm]t]rpvaWj VOU CmWtcran,�tlkGUU 11•Vre.- EODz]]�]_ _____— ____ i 1 ! 1 i1 ` i ! : ! I PEa1lEtTn1E AD �-- 9 i �ws � i E�rAnosnme d[p M( ��AE6 yy q$qf F �aps`COVR1q� �PxFEtO lEt� 5T N�W.'D8 �}Cr:. soap 3 I� Ic g ? WE cecA I M Y a oE«Uu Ai:pARC A�D 46 =rl�ar Ll z i IEY GP�4tPS°A IE � O �¢ i AY] � n d Dla+l 90 G A �. Im+o - aft b� v:oy�� I nlvuE �xo n ! f0"°' GnrDE ucns m g . nsauwE naAa+s D:EnueEY. � AAaflEAMGI � �� :.I I i .EDP; .,AEET �� '• i - -- ��; At1F3WONIAAY E�S�Ai; I I{ .� COURTICE .- I.=� — L COURTli 9 -33 Attachment 3 t® EGD- ®25 -13 Attachment 4 to EGD- 025 -13 € t I c c.i. p g�oDo� ®k - Qoo$ �q r.ro «,. gg rr---- 1 °Interso�iUont� - ' EE %\ • O ��,� � F `I 8r n x` $+<' g ;I�c ICJ g a `� �u egc �a ;a �d 3v / 31LJ� c1��.- d.:�Q.•,.. c d N .y '1l 'tf 'O S � �� LJ sau.,nur wvE uaar g t n AA k�r> a t �E BOWMANVILLE I f q011 a D / Lending the Woy 9 -34 9 ®35 OI 5 l Ss � i cruorowuE Oy rrnE ; G � u.vxsu sir r�."ES°i sr�usr ,' y = I G G oP, k cErn siE ? oPNruu oT � rwooAVE� F sTwE.ST � „u1AOT G owner Y" ul Er51 aAHU41�61rNAY2 Its10 AVENUE WEST N��E - ruwu 3 3 s NES EAST p Q I I� NEWCASTLE I ' i sure =_rev rw l 9. ;� sYEA9r 333 sUN9ET LURNEwPO� " n.rxEY , ORO.NO AlE— I � k sTPEET Ii T�oxTp � oNST t k .I¢ANKEST D sr , ry � _ E o coNCeasax woos I , —Taus ..�. sPeEr— EVN eR v. W ;. I ' LTJ (� OI Ss u vaES�xr i � 3 { y Tuurxro 3 3 I '«�<T " n.rxEY , ORO.NO AlE— sr , ry � _ E o coNCeasax woos I vvrExro ii I❑ o+o I( RFnETI PO'a II ;. Athichment 5 to E-G®- 025 -13 11T Date: June 24, 2013 esoluti ®n #: By-law #: ep® : OPD- 011 -13 File #: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report OPD- 011 -13 be received for information. Submitted by: k:j R eviewed by: ..,. FfbAerick Horvath, Director of Operations FH /I<r dy t-.� �- a� Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 10 -1 MU 1.1 As of June 7, 2013, from January 1St to June 7th the Operations Department incurred 3,374.5 hours of total overtime for winter maintenance activities. The following is a comparison of overtime costs for the same period over five years: Year Over Time Double Lieu Time Total Hrs Cost Hrs Time Hrs Hrs 2009 1,420.5 1,109.0 999.5 31529.0 $168,463.24 2010 750.5 335.5 799.5 1,885.5 $82,306.63 2011 2,204.5 1,213.0 1,211.5 4,629.0 $217,242.00 2012 1,589.0 357.5 1,022.0 2,968.5 $128,255.47 20131 1,985.0 412.0 )77,51 3,374.5 $162,142.10 1.2 During the first four month period the Operations Department provided 39 responses, which included 28 snow clearing; 6 freezing rain /ice; and 5 for drifting /cleanup. Please note in the following table the total number of our responses for the 2013 winter season compared to the previous five years: Spring clean up of winter sand was completed by June 7th 2.1 For 2013 Council approved a winter maintenance budget of $1,842,569; plus $165,000 for sidewalks and parking lots and a Senior Snow Clearing contract of $50,000. 10 -2 OEM Spring clean up of winter sand was completed by June 7th 2.1 For 2013 Council approved a winter maintenance budget of $1,842,569; plus $165,000 for sidewalks and parking lots and a Senior Snow Clearing contract of $50,000. 10 -2 i 2.2 Winter Maintenance: 2.3 As of June 7th, 2013, the following table illustrates the expenditures incurred. Winter Control 2013 Budget 2013 Actual Variance Winter Mtce $1,525,100 $1,158,394 $366,706 Winter Mtce $317,469 $306,228 $11,241 Other Total 1 $1,642,569 $1,464,622 $377,947 There were 4 (four) snow removal operations between January and March of 2013 compared to zero (0) snow removal operations for the same period in 2012. The variance of the 2013 winter annual maintenance budget to actual up to June 7th of $377 -,947 includes an estimated sand /salt end of season inventory value of $130,341.60. Sidewalk Snow Clearing Contract: The total budget for this program for 2013 is $165,000 with an actual expenditure of $93,278 as of May 31 Sc 2012 - 2013 Senior Citizens and Physically Disabled Sidewalk Program: The total budget for this program for 2013 is $50,000 with an actual expenditure of $30,006 as of May 31St, based on the 241 registrants received. Below is a table of call -out statistics for this program from January 2011 to April 2013: 10 -3 January February March April November December Total 2011 8 12 3 0 0 7 30 2012 8 5 1 0 0 5 19 2013 4 11 4 0 n/a n/a 19 10 -3 2.5 2012 - 2013 Senior Citizens and Physically Disabled Sidewalk Program Statistics: Area 2012 -2013 Season New lteturnin Total. Bowmanville 21 93 114 Burketon 0 1 1 Courtice 24 54 78 Enniskillen 0 2 2 Hampton 0 3 3 Newcastle 9 20 29 Newtonville 0 4 4 Orono 1 9 10 Totals 55 186 241 3. CONCURRENCE - Not applicable X 4.1 The current surplus reflected in this report is based on year to date actual. Final annual results will therefore be impacted by November and December 2013 winter conditions. Staff will continue to provide storm updates to you throughout the fall and winter and will report to Council in early 2014 on the costs of the 2013 winter maintenance program. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Fred Horvath, Director of Operations List of Interested Parties: None WIM, RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report ESD- 005 -13 be received for information. Submitted by: `" Reviewed by: ordon Weir, AMC,T, CMM111 Director Emergency and Fire Services GW *jm a(-g'� ---) 4-) � Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905- 623 -3379 F 905 - 623 -6506 1 1 -1 REPORT NO: ESD- 005 -13 1.0 COMMENT Page 2 1.1 Staff has prepared the 2012 Annual Report (Attachment #1) and would like to highlight three key items, for your information: (a) The Department experienced a 2.8% reduction in total calls. The largest numbers of fires were in the Vehicle Category at 49 %, followed by Group C — Residential at 34% and Miscellaneous Structures /Property Fires at 8 %. (b) Our Fire and Public Education Programs continue to be very successful. Programs such as our Family Safety Day, Junior Firefighter Program and Racing Against Drugs and numerous other programs continue to be well attended. (c) Staff delivered "The Operational Planning Report: An Official Guide to Matching Resource Deployment and Risk Report" to Council which suggested the matrix to be used in the delivery of the 3rd line of defense. Fire Suppression Services are now delivered efficiently by aligning our responses to the recommendations. 2.0 CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Mark Berney, Deputy Fire Chief Attachments: Attachment 1: Clarington Emergency and Fire Services 2012 Annual Report List of Interested Parties: None 11 -2 L Mi� EL-- 5 0 F' 0 E� F Ec I By ensuring that buildings have the required fire protection systems, safety features e.g. every home in Ontario must have a working smoke alarm on every storey and outside all sleeping areas. F- Emergency response is the failsafe for those times when fire does occur.. find Mro SerAc es I U / , J r 11 -3 -Woo 2- WAYS OWT of EVERY Room. Roodn 3ot1 s Residents educated to take responsibility for their own fire safety and to take the steps R o Room necessary to prevent fires. - L;� ;nq i2oorn PlacePlace q , Porch 8i9QO\t`` Tree y Enforcoimen'(� By ensuring that buildings have the required fire protection systems, safety features e.g. every home in Ontario must have a working smoke alarm on every storey and outside all sleeping areas. F- Emergency response is the failsafe for those times when fire does occur.. find Mro SerAc es I U / , J r 11 -3 MaNngWn t =mer gency and dove Serve cea We are DEDICATED to a ME SAFrE COMMUMTY To ensure we deliver SERVICE EXCELLENCE through response EverY meHlber of OaHngton Emergency and FH're Services uphollds the traco Lion of a corn p o sole department and BOUNDARY 11 -4 Message from Director of Emergency and Fire Services /Fire Chief 1 Organizational Structure 2 Fire Station Locations 3 Response Types 4 Response Statisitics 5 Fire Statisitics g Fire Prevention and Public Education 11 Training and Professional Developmet 12 Emergency and Fire Services Budget 13 Service Medals 14 Acknowledgements / Announcements 15 Career Employees — Past and Present 16 Volunteer Firefighters — Present Day 17 .�n,`a Your Worship Mayor A. Foster and Members of Council: The information contained in this report is a summary of the activities of Clarington Emergency and Fire Services (CEFS) for the year ending December 31, 2012. The number of incidents reported to the Ontario Fire Marshal's Office was 3,410 a reduction of 2.8% from 2011. Fire responses totaled 207, approximately 6% of the Department's total calls. Fire losses are estimated at $3,796,100. As a result of fire, there were 5 civilian injuries. Highlights in 2012 included: • Construction of the new fire station for Newcastle began • Staffed delivered The Operational Planning: An Official Guide to Matching Resource Deployment and Risk report to Council • The Open Air Burning Bylaw application and permit process changed • Council approved a new Master Fire Plan be completed in 2013 • Staff have been actively involved in the NextGen Radio System project, developing the foundation for Dispatch Services to be provided by Oshawa Fire • 553 homes were visited during the annual Alarm for Life Program • 200 children participated in the Junior Firefighter Program • Staff attended numerous community events and school fun fairs, provided many safety lectures and station tours to community groups • Staff again joining forces with Durham Regional Police and the Ontario Provincial Police for the Christmas "Ride" season, assisting officers in spreading the important message of "Don't Drink and Drive" • Delivery of a new pumper truck and two light duty trucks In summary, staff worked hard through 2012 providing extraordinary services to the residents, businesses and visitors of Clarington. The coming year will prove challenging for staff as they work to reduce the risk of fire in Clarington and participate in several key projects including construction of the Newcastle Fire Station, partnering Fire Dispatch Services, meeting the goals of NextGen and analyzing service delivery. Thank you for your support of the Department. Gord Weir Director of Emergency and Fire Services /Fire Chief 11 -6 $1�0, WO EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION CHART 2012 Gord 2 �O — ° -- - - - .................................... Bill Hesson Mark Beene] i I SUPPRESSION MAINTENANCE TRAINING FIREPREVENTION I ?'$rjT1}ti CAPTAINS _.._.._.._.._.__.._ TECHNICIAN .— .._.._....._. OFFICER _.._.._.._.. OFFICER _. �.:. Jo -Ann Macdonald D. Chambers George Schroer Tim Calhoun _.._.._.._.._. Rand Reinert R.IQosinsw y „t P. Lomax FIRE N PREVENTIO _ _ _CLERKI _ — Trixie G. Oliver INSPECTORS G. Dusseldorp _ Bill Re d T. Ruder Jacquelyn Hill -Borer M. (Reich JenniferDelane Vacant RESPONSIBILITIES: DISPATCHERS_ EmergencyResponse SUPPRESSION Alec hlamiltorr Emergency Planning hTR......ERS '. AZevado ra. Laoroweur !T. Murr .. Mallory Ayer Fire Prevention Public Education Matt Schroer - Fire Suppression 3. &adtey IR. McCrxcheonjA Fodlls Sam Graham - Communicationst0is alch :. Coatham jP. 07fere jE01on Matt Hoo &teen ?.Conan :S. Wcherdson,D. Worrell Is Complement I. Dmsson !B. Rogers !D. Glaspell .::E$11 T?pE'x$ 4 :. Day jP. Rowan jR. Gardner `1tl;�tiiNEkS +• Union - Italicized 59 k Dennis IF Shcherbak I& proctor 5 District Chiefs Part-time 0 Donnelly 'R. Staples 'M. Oliver ostler !R. Vanderkoat !D. 20 Captains 129 ryte 100 Firefighters Total 192 >. Ferguson I D. While 6. Mercer 4 Jr. Firefighters Henson T. Santos IS. Snowden Department Head Backup- '. Speakman IS. Faeroe U. Gibson - Deputy I.Pellerin :A WC-kay Vacant Crouch I M walks 1 2 �O Five fire stations are strategically located throughout the Municipality: Station 1 — 2430 Highway 2, Bowmanville Station 2 — 247 King Avenue East, Newcastle Station 3 — 5708 Main Street, Orono Station 4 — 2611 Trulls Road, Courtice Station 5 — 2354 Concession Road 8, Enniskillen 11 -8 Location of new Station 2 3333 Highway 2, Newcastle �t i 5 d Suppression staff responded to a variety of calls including: Fire and Explosions: Instance or destructive and uncontrolled burning involving structures, vehicles and open area fires, including explosion of combustible solids, liquids or gasses which may or may not have resulted in a dollar loss or an explosion or rupture as a result of pressure, no fire. Outdoor, No Loss Fires: Uncontrolled fires, outdoors, that did not result in a loss, injury or fatality and is not suspected to be caused by arson, vandalism or children playing. Pre Fire Conditions: Incidents with no fire that involve heat or potential pre fire conditions e.g. pot on stove, cooking - smoke or steam, lightning, fireworks. Burning (controlled): Complaint call related to outdoor controlled burning, authorized or unauthorized. Fire Department did not take suppression action. False Fire Call: Alarm activation or fire call that when investigated, is determined to be as a result of equipment failure, malicious /prank, perceived emergency, accidental activation of alarm by a person. CO (carbon monoxide) False Call: a call where it is determined that the detection equipment malfunctioned or there was a perceived emergency - no CO leak. Public Hazard Call: Includes a response for spills and leaks of a hazardous product such as natural gas, propane, refrigerant, miscellaneous /unknown, gasoline or fuel, toxic chemical, radio - active material, power lines down or arcing, bomb, explosive removal standby, CO (carbon monoxide) or other public hazard. Rescue Call: a call for a person in danger due to their proximity to the occurrence and who is unable to self evacuate and is assisted by Fire Department personnel i.e. vehicle accident, building collapse, commercial /industrial accident, home /residential accident, persons trapped in elevator, water rescue or water /ice rescue. Medical Call: Includes a response to a patient(s) suffering from asphyxia, respiratory condition, convulsions, epileptic, diabetic seizure, electric shock, traumatic shock, heart attack, stroke, drug related, cuts, abrasions, fractures, burns, person fainted, nausea and pre - hospital care such as administering oxygen, CPR, defibrillation or first aid. Other Calls: Assistance to other Fire Departments, calls cancelled on route, non fire incidents where an illegal grow operation or drug operation was discovered. 12 �O The chart below illustrates the year end totals by month for fires, outdoor no loss fires and non fire calls. Month Fires Outdoor, No Loss Fires Non Fire Calls Totals January 13 0 290 303 February 8 1 219 228 March 5 19 264 288 April 5 33 247 285 May 11 17 295 323 June 9 9 265 283 July 16 6 267 289 August 8 2 301 311 September 7 1 249 257 October 9 7 276 292 November 5 4 243 252 December 8 4 287 299 Totals 104 103 3203 3410 The chart below illustrates the 3 -year trend in Call Volume by month ■ 2012 ■ 2011 ❑ 2010 350 325 300 275 250 225 200 11 -10 CU L Q .Q Q C ¢ O s= s= O U > U Q O O O Z r-) 5 The following chart illustrates the percentage of calls to the Response Types 8% 10% 5% 49% ❑ Fires /Explosions 6% ■ Pre -Fire Conditions 1 % ❑ Burning Complaints 4% ❑ False Fire Calls 10% ■ Co False Calls 5% ❑ Public Hazard Calls 5% ■ Rescue Calls 12% ❑ Medical Calls 49% ■ Other Responses 8% The following chart illustrates the 3 -year trend in Response Types Response Types 2012 2011 2010 Fires /Explosions 207 187 173 Pre Fire Conditions 48 59 50 Burning Complaints 122 90 114 False Fire Calls 331 327 295 CO False Calls 164 196 203 Public Hazard Calls 154 148 131 Rescue Calls 425 443 388 Medical Calls 1682 1813 1,683 Other Responses 277 240 237 Total Number of Calls 3410 3503 3274 % Change -2.8% +7% -1.5% C.1 The Department's fleet of emergency vehicles responded 5,106 times, a decrease of 6 % from the previous year. Pumper 1 (now Pump 10) was the busiest truck in the fleet responding to 2,234 calls. 7 11 -12 Occupancies are categorized using the Ontario Building Code as follows: Group A: Assembly occupancy units. Assembly occupancies means the occupancy or the use of a building, or part thereof, be for gathering of persons for civic, political, travel, religious, social, educational, recreational, or like purposes, or for the consumption of food or drink i.e. Production/Viewing Performing Arts, Museum /Art Gallery /Auditorium, Recreation /Sports Facilities, Education Facilities, Transportation Facilities, Other Assemblies, Arenas /Swimming Pools, and Participating/Viewing Open Air Facilities. Group B: Care or Detention occupancy units. Care or detention occupancy means the occupancy or use of a building, or part thereof, be for persons who (a) are dependent on others to release security devices to permit egress, (b) receive special care and treatment, or (c) receive supervisory care . i.e. Persons under restraint facilities, persons under supervisory care facilities, care facilities, group /retirement homes Group C: Residential occupancy units. Residential occupancy means the occupancy or use of a building, or part thereof, by means for whom sleeping accommodation is provided but who are not harbored or detained to receive medical care or treatment or are not involuntarily detained. i.e. Detached /Semi /Attached Residential, Dual Residential /Business, Rooming /Boarding, Multi Unit Dwelling, Hotel /Motel /Lodging, Other Residential Group E: Mercantile occupancy units. Mercantile occupancy means the occupancy or use of a building, or part thereof, for the displaying or selling of retail goods, wares, or merchandise. i.e. Food /Beverage Sales, Department Store /Catalogue /Mail Outlet, Specialty Stores, Other Mercantile Group F: Industrial occupancy units. Industrial occupancy means the occupancy or use of a building, or part thereof, for the assembling, fabricating, manufacturing, processing, repairing or storing of goods and materials. i.e. Vehicle sales /service, Utilities, Manufacturing or Processing Facilities, Storage Facilities, Other Industrial Facilities Structures /Properties not classified by the O.B.C.: Mines or Wells, Transportation /Communication Facilities, Open (outdoor) Storage, Miscellaneous Structures and Property, Structures classed under the National Farm Building Code. Vehicles: Road Vehicles, Rail Vehicles, Watercraft, Aircraft, Miscellaneous /Specialty Vehicles The number of fire loss occurrences was largest in the Vehicles and Residential property types 49% 1% 2% ❑ Group A - Assembly 1 % 3% 8% ® Group B - Institutional 2% ❑ Group C - Residential 34% 34% ❑ Group D - Business & Personal Services I% ■ Group E - Mercantile 2% ❑ Group F - Industrial 3% ■ Miscellaneous Structures /Property 8% ❑ Vehicles 49% The chart below illustrates the Area of Origin for fire. Functional areas include of a home including living areas, sleeping areas, dinning and cooking areas. Vehicle areas include the ❑ Functional Area ■ Storage Area ❑ Building Services /Support 5% Area 2% ❑ Structural Area 8% ■ Outside Area ❑ Vehicle Areas ■ Miscellaneous engine area, electrical systems, fuel systems, operator /passenger areas and trunk areas. 9 COQ 11 -14 The chart below illustrates Fire Cause statistics. Intentional fires include those set by arson, riot /civil commotion, suspected vandalism, and suspected youth vandalism (ages 12 m 17) 43% I d°/ 6% ❑ Intentional 14% ❑ Design /Construction /Maintenance Issue 2% 14% ❑ Misuse of Ignition Source /Material Ignited 14% ❑ Mechanical /Electrical Failure 21% ® Other Unintentional 6% ❑ Other /Undetermined 43% The Chart below identifies the fires with a dollar loss greater than $75,000 10 Extinguishing a fire before it ignites through public education programs and code enforcement are the first two lines of defense and this Department's goal. Every member of Emergency and Fire Services contributes daily to this goal. Inspections arising from complaints, requests, } �' r retrofits, or self - initiated inspections in accordance with the Fire Protection and Prevention Act and Departmental policies¢' traditionally keep staff from proactively;,„,' - scheduling regular inspections. In addition,_ with :► ___ the completion of the Operational Planning report in 2012, staff will utilize the report to prioritize the inspection of risks within the community. New construction inspections and plans review of buildings under construction in matters respective of fire protection systems and life safety within buildings are conducted in accordance with the Building Code, Ontario Fire Code and applicable by -laws. 'Zero tolerance' remains our motto for offenders of the Ontario Fire Code. Examining and investigating fire scenes and interviewing witnesses in an effort to determine cause and origin of fires and provide the foundation for public educational programs. 553 homes were visited through the Department's Residential Smoke Alarm Program. L h P. 1 N G r Pt pill . Junior Firefighter Program September 29, 2012 was Family Safety Day in Clarington. This year's event will take place on Saturday, September 28, 2013 and will again feature community- minded safety organizations providing awareness to everyone on personal safety and emergency preparedness. 2012 marked the 18`h anniversary of this program. Students in the weeklong camp learn valuable skills in firefighting, personal safety, police and emergency medical services. The program provides 200 Clarington children with a memorable opportunity. 11 11 -16 ,c ^�� Training and Professional Development of the Department's career and volunteer firefighters is the responsibility of the Training Officer. Developing personnel to the Ontario Fire Service Standards, industry best practices, Occupational Health and Safety Regulations, and the expectations of Council requires an extraordinary commitment. Highlights in training and professional development included training in the following areas: ■ All firefighters received Positive Pressure Attack training — great success with implementation and on improving safety and property conservation ■ Hydrogen Cyanide was delivered to all staff ■ Fulltime Officers obtained Blue Card Incident Commander Certification ■ Fulltime firefighters completed IMS — 100 through Emergency Management Ontario ■ Fulltime Officers and Acting Captains participated Incident Command Training at Wesleyville ■ All firefighters received a complete review and testing on Department and Corporate Policies and Guidelines, Section 21 Guidelines, Occupational Health and Safety Guidelines ■ All Drivers completed NFPA Road Course training ■ Selected Officers obtained Incident Safety Officer Certification at the Ontario Fire College ■ OFM Pump Ops certification is still on -going throughout the Department ■ Tanker shuttle accreditation and certification was successfully completed ■ All firefighters participated in live fire training at Wesleyville and the Oshawa Airport ■ All firefighters completed a Defensive Driver Training program (CEVO) ■ All firefighters received Chainsaw training ■ 12 new recruits completed 160 hours of recruit training. 12 In 2012, Clarington Emergency and Fire Services operating budget totaled approximately $9,713,809. This graph illustrates the Department's operating budgets over the past three (3) years: 1000000 950000 900000 850000 6500000 2012 Emergency and Fire Services 2012 Budget Allocation 8.9% 2011 2010 Emergency and Fire Services 2012 Operating Budget by Division 1 8.8% 0.4% , . ❑ Salaries & Benfits 91.1% ®Other Expenditures 8.9% ❑ Administration 14.7% ■ Prevention 5.9% ❑ Suppression 62.5% ❑ Training 1.5% IJ Communications 4.69/6 ❑ Mechanical 1.4% Q Part -Time Stations 8.8% ❑ MEOC 0.4% 13 11 -18 9% ro-loxill Fire Services Exemplary Service Medal The Fire Services Exemplary Service Medal program, created on August 29, 1985, honours members of a recognized Canadian fire service who have completed 20 years of service, ten years of which have been served in the performance of duties involving potential risks, and were employed on or after the date-of creation of the medal. Exemplary service is characterized by good conduct, industry and efficiency. The Fire Services Exemplary Service Medal was awarded to the following individuals in 2011: Captain Gary Dusseldorp • Captain Roy Pfister • Firefighter Ray Charron =' \f-W.' • Firefighter Ed Donnelly - - Firefighter Lonny Gibson ,.si • Firefighter Marc Ladouceur • Firefighter Tony Van Mill" Ontario Fire Services Long Service Medal First awarded in 1971, the Ontario Fire Services Long Service Medal is an appreciation and recognition of uniformed staff for 25 years - r of dedication and hard work within the Ontario fire service. += At 30 years of service and every 5 years thereafter, a service bar may be requested and added to the medal's ribbon. Spouses of medal recipients receive a companion brooch. The Ontario Fire Services Long Service Medal was : _'.;, awarded to the following in 2011: ' -�1 °; • Captain Peter Lomax • Firefighter Murray Dennis • Firefighter George Schroor In addition, three firefighters achieved the following milestones: 30 year Provincial & Federal Bar — Fire Chief Gord Weir 35 year Provincial Bar — District Chief Don Holmes The dedication and commitment these firefighters have given to our Municipality is truly appreciated. 14 *119 Clarington Emergency and Fire Services would like to acknowledge the following: • Ontario Power Generation, for their continued support of the Junior Firefighter Program, Family Safety Day and the training and professional development of the Department's front line staff. • Durham Regional Police and Inspector Kluem for their efforts in providing community safety and their continued support of our firefighters during emergencies. • Durham Emergency Medical Services and Chief Armstrong for their continued support of our firefighters during emergencies. • Salvation Army and Major Roland Murphy for their continued support of our firefighters during emergencies. • Tim Horton's in Bowmanville for their continued support of our firefighters during emergencies. • To all the agencies, businesses and organizations that make Family Safety Day in Clarington the success it is. • Civilian Letters of Commendation to ■ Daniel and Tim Sargent ■ Matt Ferguson • Congratulations to Randy Cowan, promotion to Captain • Congratulations to Ken Ostler, promotion to Training Officer • Congratulations to Matt Hoogsteen, new dispatcher. • Thank y e • e Du to our new volunteer firefighters: Robert McQuay, Station 1 Sean Blanchard, Station 2 Jeff Piersma, Station 2 Robert Williams, Station 3 Jordan Ritchie, Station 3 Jordan Trolley, Station3 Simeon Devries, Station 3 • Jason Speight, Station 4 • Matthew Neely, Station 4 • Ryan teBogt, Station4 • Paul Keys, Station 5 • Pierce Warwick, Station 5 • Matt Ferguson, Station 5 • A special thank you to Firefighter Harold Huitema, Station 4 who resigned after many years of accumulative service to our community. Thank you Harold. • A special thank you to District Chief John Pittens who resigned after 33 years service to our community. Thank you John. 15 11 -20 16 Jim Hayman, Fire Chief, Retired 41 Bob McCutcheon, Firefighter Michael Creighton, Fire Chief Retired 42 Paul Rowan, Firefighter Huge Doherty, Deputy Chief Resigned 43 Marc Ladouceur, Firefighter Sheila Roman, Retired 44 Jay Hansen, Firefighter Ann Marie Cook, Retired 45 Rob Staples, Firefighter Trixie Wright 46 Paul O'Hare, Firefighter Jo -Ann Macdonald 47 Bryan Rogers, Firefighter 10 Graydon Brown, Captain, Retired 48 Bill Speakman, Firefighter 11 Bill Lyle, Captain, Retired 49 John Genereau, Dispatcher, Resigned 12 Rob Payne, Captain, Retired 50 Stew Richardson, Firefighter 14 Trent Elyea, Captain, Resigned 51 Darryl White, Firefighter 15 Gord Weir, Fire Chief 52 Bill Reid, Inspector 16 Bill Hesson, Deputy Chief 53 Dan Pellerin, Firefighter 17 Mark Berney, Deputy Chief 54 Tony Santos, Firefighter 18 Gary Oliver, Captain 55 Jacquie Hill- Bower, Inspector 19 Don Chambers, Captain 56 Duane Tyte, Firefighter 20 Ted Ruiter, Captain 57 Dwayne Glaspell, Firefighter 21 Murray Dennis, Firefighter 58 Aidan McConkey, Firefighter 22 Ron Klosinski, Captain, Retired 59 Rob Gardner, Firefighter Bryan Piggott, Firefighter, Resigned 60 Dan Worrall, Firefighter 23 Randy Reinert, Fire Prevention Officer 61 Steve Valk, Inspector, Resigned 24 Owen Ferguson, Firefighter 62 Stephen Proctor, Firefighter 25 Peter Lomax, Captain 63 Matt Oliver, Firefighter 26 Ken Ostler, Training Officer 64 Aaron Pudlis, Firefighter 27 George Schroor, Maintenance Technician 65 Eric Dion, Firefighter 28 Grant Bradley, Firefighter 66 Michael Kalita, Firefighter 29 Tim Calhoun, Senior Training Officer 67 Tyler Muir, Firefighter 30 Randy Cowan, Captain 68 Kyle Crouch, Firefighter 31 Paul Shcherbak, Firefighter 69 Scott Snowden, Firefighter 32 Mark Ulrich, Captain 70 Brent Pearce, Firefighter 33 Rick Vanderkooi, Firefighter 71 Bryan Mercer, Firefighter 34 Jeff Dawson, Firefighter 72 Jennifer Delaney, Inspector 35 Ed Donnelly, Firefighter 73 Matt Gibson, Firefighter 36 Gary Dusseldorp, Captain 74 Alec Hamilton, Firefighter 37 Richard Day, Firefighter 75 Matt Schroor, Firefighter 38 Frank Azevedo, Firefighter 76 Mallory Ayer, Firefighter 39 Steve Richardson, Firefighter, Deceased 77 Sam Graham, Firefighter 40 Carl Coatham, Firefighter 78 Matt Hoogsteen, Firefighter 79 Chris Carnovale, Firefighter 80 Craig Forsey, Firefighter 16 Station 1 Bowmanville Station 2 Newcastle Station 3 Orono Station 4 Courtice Station 5 Enniskillen District Chief District Chief District Chief District Chief District Chief Langley, Jeff Holmes, Don Forrester, David Brady, Troy Gassmann, Henry Captain Captain Captain Captain Captain Kay, Timothy McQuat, Drew Brown, Graydon Amey, Robert Christie, Tom Morrison, Don Koerssen, Harry Chad, Stephen Prest, Dan Osborne, Richard Noble, Tim Wood, Robert Lamers, Harold St. Pierre, Denis Pfister, Roy Yeo, Scott Pollock, Brent Stephens, Todd Tillson, Norm Firefighters Firefighters Firefighters Firefighters Firefighters Berney, Mike Almond, Brad Bugden, Jeff Bickle, John Beck, James Diensthuber, Holly Bandstra, Ryan Christian, Aaron Burns, Johnathon Davidson, Jamie Grani, Chris Beenan, Ray Devries, Simeon Christie, Neil Hall, Jeremy Green, Phil Blanchard, Sean Di Lella, Michael Change, Jesse Ferguson, Matt Jeffs, Brett Cavers, James Easa, Ben Hubley, Kristian Fox, Robert Marano, Tom Charron, Ray Griffin, Richard Kekki, Dave Keys, Paul Meaker, Kyle Bickle, Kent Heeney, Michael Lucas, Ryan Link, Dean Murray, Michael Gibson, Lonny Hutchison, Paul McKellar, Peter Mason, Robert Oliver, Mike Hunt, Graydon Lauzon, Bradley Mossing, Barry Mastrangelo, Pat Ortins, Manuel Jordan, Phil Lynde - Sinclair, A Neely, Matthew Millson, Brad Pitney, Noel Lawson, Dave McKelvie, Mike Smith, Jeffery O'Neill, Richard Staples, Chris Teaz, Martin Mercer, Jason Soles, Bradford Page, Robert Stone, Thomas McCool, Larry Ritchie, Jordon Speight, Jason Pannekoek,.Jason Suess, Michael Moore, Chris Scott, Kevin Stano, Erasmo Payne, John Taylor, James Powell, Taylor Trachsler, Martin Stephenson, Paul Pollard, Dale Taylor, Jesse Piersma, Jeff Trolley, Jordan teBogt, Ryan Warwick, Pierce Van Mil, Tony Rose, Darryl Walker, Mark Wolla, Stein Warwick, Roy Vanderbruggen,P Rowley, Cory Williams, Robert Froats, Jordan Woodcock, Jeff Willsher, Todd Stafford, John Worona, Ed Littlejohn, Frank Yarwood, Jon Schmahl, Bill Cameron, Scott McQuay, Robert Wright, Don Carnovale, Chris Forsey, Craig Lathangue, Mark Prevent Coo ` atch What You Heat 11 -22 REPOR b� ' i nj MUNICIPAL CLERK'S DEPARTMENI)' Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 24, 2013 Resolution #: By -law #: N/A Report#: CLD- 023 -13 File #: C12.NEWCASTLE ARENA BOARD Subject: APPOINTMENTS TO NEWCASTLE ARENA BOARD It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CLD- 023 -13 be received; 2. THAT the resignation of Jo -Anne Raymond be received, with regret, and that she be thanked for her contribution to the Newcastle Arena Board; 3. THAT be appointed to the Newcastle Arena Board for a term concurrent with the term of Council; and 4. THAT all interested parties listed in Report CLD- 023 -13 be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Reviewed by: AP Wbdr MO Franklin Wu, Muhi6pal Clerk Chief Administrative Officer PLB /jeg CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 13 -1 REPORT NO.: CLD- 023 -13 -• 1.1 Newcastle Arena Board PAGE 2 The Newcastle Arena Board is a volunteer Municipal Service Board established by the Municipality of Clarington Council in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended. The goal of the Newcastle Arena Board is to operate the Newcastle Memorial Arena. The composition of the Board is as follows: 9 persons, 2 of whom shall be members of Council Committee members are ultimately responsible to the Municipality of Clarington Council and are bound by By -law 2008 -037, appointing the Newcastle Arena Board. Meetings are held the second Tuesday of each month, at 7:00 p.m. The term of appointment will be concurrent with the term of Council. 2. CURRENT SITUATION 2.1 Resiqnation of Jo -Anne Raymond Jo -Anne Raymond was appointed to the Newcastle Arena Board in January, 2011. The Municipal Clerk's Department received her resignation on June 10, 2013. Following Council's appointments in 2011, all unsuccessful candidates were advised that their applications would remain on file for consideration should a vacancy occur on the Newcastle Arena Board. Accordingly, the Municipal Clerk's Department contacted previous applicants (and any additional applications received since the appointments were made) to the Newcastle Arena Board to determine whether they wish to put forward their name for consideration. At the time of writing of this report, the following have confirmed with the Municipal Clerk's Department that they wish to be considered for appointment to the Newcastle Arena Board: Patrick Lange Shea -Lea Latchford' NOTE: Shea -Lea Latchford is currently appointed to the Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee Applications for the above -named applicants have been circulated under separate cover (Attachment 1) as they contain personal information about these applicants. 13 -2 REPORT • ! 1 PAGE 3 It is respectfully recommended that Jo -Anne Raymond be thanked for her contribution to the Newcastle Arena Board. In order to fulfill the requirements of the Terms of Reference, it is recommended that one of the following be appointed to the Newcastle Arena Board, for a term concurrent with the term of Council: • Patrick Lange • Shea -Lea Latchford CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk Confidential Attachments (Distributed Separately): Attachment 1: Newcastle Arena Board Applications List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Jo -Anne Raymond Patrick Lange Shea -Lea Latchford Gord Lee, Chair, Newcastle Arena Board 13 -3 Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 24, 2013 Resolution: y °law: recommend to Council the following: THAT Report COD - 017 -13 be received; 2. THAT Coco Paving Inc., Oshawa, Ontario, with a total bid in the amount of $519,328.41 (net of H.S.T. Rebate), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2013 -08 be awarded the contract for 2013 Surface Asphalt, Various Locations, as required by the Municipality of Clarington, Engineering Department; and 3. THAT the funds required in the amount of $581,000.00 (which includes $519,328.39 for construction, material testing, contingencies and net HST) be drawn from the following Engineering Department 2013 Capital Accounts: Surface Asphalt Accounts: 110 -32- 330 - 83408 -7401 ........................................... ............................... $129,000 110 -32- 330 - 83296 -7401 ........................................... ............................... $183,000 110 -32- 330 - 83298 -7401 .......................................... ............................... $107,000 110 -32 -330- 83332 -7401 ............................................. ............................... $89,000 110 -32- 330 - 83409 -7401 ............................................. ............................... $20,000 110 -32- 330 - 83331 -7401 ............................................. ............................... $22,000 110 -32- 330 - 83236 -7401 ............................................. ............................... $31,000 TotalFunding ........................................................... ............................... . 5 100 $ 8 0 Submitted by: ®" _ Marie Marano, H.B.Sc., AMCT Director of Corporate Services �iSlrNancy Taylor, BBA, CPA, CA Director of Finance/Treasurer Reviewed byd Franklin Wu, MAOM Chief Administrative Officer MM \JDB \mc CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1 C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 14 -1 ... i 1.1 Tender specifications were prepared by the Engineering Department for the 2013 Surface Asphalt, Various Locations. 1.2 Tender CL2013 -08 2013 Surface Asphalt - Various Locations was advertised in the Daily Commercial News as well as electronically on the Municipality's website and the Ontario Public Buyer's Association website. Subsequently, tenders were received and tabulated as per "Attachment 1 ". r° 2.1 A total of four (4) submissions were received in response to the tender call. All submissions were deemed compliant. 2.2 After further review and analysis of the compliant bids by the Engineering Department and Purchasing, it was mutually agreed that the low bidder, Coco Paving Inc., Bowmanville, Ontario be recommended for the contract for the 2013 Surface Asphalt - Various Locations. A copy of the recommendation memo from the Department of Engineering is appended as "Attachment 2 ". 2.3 The low bidder has provided similar services to the Municipality of Clarington in the past and the level of service has been satisfactory. 2.4 Queries with respect to the department needs, specifications, etc. should be referred to the Director of Engineering. r 3ir1_\iC3 /_1 3.1 The total project cost is $581,000.00. The funding required for the project is outlined in the memo from Engineering Services ( "Attachment 1 "). 3.2 Funding for this project will be drawn from the following 2013 Engineering Capital accounts: Surface Asphalt Accounts: 110 -32- 330 - 83408 -7401 ........................................... ............................... $129,000 110 -32- 330 - 83296 -7401 ........................................... ............................... 183,000 110 -32- 330 - 83298 -7401 ....... ............................... ............................... $107,000 110 -32- 330 - 83332 -7401 ............................................. ............................... $89,000 110 -32- 330 - 83409 -7401 ............................................. ............................... $20, 000 110 -32- 330 - 83331 -7401 ............................................. ............................... $22,000 110 -32- 330 - 83236 -7401 ............................................ ............................... $31,000 TotalFunding ..................................... ............................... .......................$581,000 HM .•` • 1 .. This report has been reviewed by Tony Cannella, Director of Engineering Services who concurs with the recommendations. WO 5. CONCLUSION 5.1 To award the contract to Coco Paving Inc., Bowmanville, Ontario for the Surface Asphalt - Various Locations. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — The recommendations contained in this report conform to the general. intent of the following priorities of the Strategic Plan: Promoting economic development Maintaining financial stability Connecting Clarington Promoting green initiatives X Investing in infrastructure Showcasing our community Not in conformity with Strategic Plan Staff Contact: Jerry Barber, Manager of Purchasing Attachments: Attachment 1 - Summary of Bid Results Attachment 2 - Recommendation Memo from Engineering Services 14 -3 ATTACHMENT # I to Report COD-017-13 L "I � l ' 301 1 IS' U-11-Imp BIDDER TOTAL BID Total Bid (HST included) Net of HST Rebate Coco Paving, $576,668.73 $519,328.41 Bowmanville, ON Ashland Paving Ltd. $745,563.12 $671,402.70 Concord, ON Royel Paving Limited $761,255.12 $685,533.82 Lindsay, ON Miller Paving Limited $783,580.89 $705,638.87 I iWhitbv, ON I WWI _t TO: Jerry Barber, Purchasing Manager ATTACHMENT #2 to Report COD - 017 -13 FROM: Ron Albright, Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Works DATE: June 17, 2013 RE: 2013 Surface Asphalt, Various Locations CL2013 -8 Tenders for the above project were opened at the Municipal Offices on Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 2:00 p,m.The Engineering Services Department has reviewed the submissions for CL2013 -8 and offers the following comments. The scope of the project deals with placing the surface lift of asphalt on recently constructed roads that have been left at base asphalt for the past few years to allow for any minor settlement which typically occurs with most road construction involving the installation of underground infrastructure within the roadway. The Municipality of Clarington has worked with Coco Paving Inc. on many projects in the past and they have completed the work satisfactorily. We recommend award of the contract to Coco Paving Inc. in the amount of $576,691.33, inclusive of HST, or $519,328.41 net of HST rebate. Due to past experiences on similar projects, a contingency amount of 10% is carried forward. The attached cost apportionment shows the total project costs including contingencies and material testing, and the budget for each site. Total project cost for each section is within the available budget. The total project cost for all sites is $581,000.00. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Regards, Ron Albright, P. Eng. Manager, Infrastructure and RA/sb /dv Attachment ks Pc: Nancy Taylor, Director of Finance A.S. Cannella, Director of Engineering Services hl'Del_ ailment \Capital Works\ 2013 \CSA 2 .013.1 \Correspondence \Alamo to Purchasing ie Tendrr Award 012013 -8, 20i3 Suiface Asphalt doc 14 -5 ^p. () N r o O W 1 C) cn P O cn r- 0 n N L V N ME Q .A .. / x 0 JACNn,.. WVIEW FOUR. VANSTONE CT BV '` ST CAMPLING: O � (III �/ COURT m R .� Q D "l w ' SUMMERFIEL� 9JNSET V x �W ��,`. _ 55y 'J .VVCN 3 All ._ M .��y 'HaI�IR�,. CT 5TRE11�1'OAD r :NACON 'W IRELAN \ TZoMI< °. �. LUVERME CT C FR �' ym d BLOSSOr R y '7Z0 p1 gROpA7/i WrF 3 LLBGVD o HIGH.STRECT � TLLEY" ��IIEDERI y t; SURFACE•ASPHALT m EDSALLA' EC NOF ST V� ROAD o z RRA NE R IFRO �. U K y FD AVENUE I "d FViS Si. SAUNDERS m I j TUCKER RD N>' h L J o STEVENS ROAD r o mSURFACE ASPHALT STEVENS ROAD fiNUFJ I0DE1 BORLANDLL CUR lu °qa A \� (((�' m w C T�EVEN ROAD h0� I �w ¢ DAD GREEN ADAD x tj URFACEASPHALT y, U OIN AVE. w TRU OR CT p G�� ORI LOWE gT LOVERS IA - a + CIONq p/y tl 6 FL m �y�' < 'HIGHWAY2 BV SONATHONCR` DRIVE Z �-z ��{[Y�• . �_ Si�R 6 y a J O� U- LIBERTY�� CT _J 0 O 0 W w .> Yddd J Cx� CDL �NZ °� A /�✓Gyr�c(�� RLISLEAV O ° 0 xp i R VOOD p PRINCE WILLIAM - BOULEVARD ° v TREYJIN pR i �E I�pVENU \\ O� ��`� F m 5781K'cAV l \U OJ'F. ¢ < ¢ �2 RF�'C'F �� a' Yf •(9- \\ I CHURCH Si CLIAiIF� U OJW _� 0�0 NY� LANE K K I py,Lt,' P O SpRINC+` H' G I m .❑ L1 KING STREET CT � .EAST xa � ` LAWRENCE .o G.ipN �a LL I ��" �E ❑ MEADOWS < HART, ELL w HpL' VfO�p'i 7 m Y HOBBS DRIVE SIREN QppF z All +J DOREEN �iyF °.p F`pM' . o` STREET Legend Surface CR x CAN D'. ��`)) g �� CR cBRIDEAV U �ESTON�'AY ' � �� ¢ Ri PRINCESTREET ;C ASHOALE OUINN oC2 s O DEERPE m R 'YO 0E S ART K STREET � L F q `'S Asphalt � � 'S. w' Z g F x g • 6Iu AGN `.MsrnF1CA5T1E Dft CRIVE., HIOIi. E 0 ` F t„ I tl i+u�E C7• B wYiN O �'T PENFOUND Q A NNA EFt ALO �i' _JJANE NE _ F v O �0<21/ P F 5 w o � y �G`JF EET Q ?' HODBS ORNE STR �r'S' xm m0 G -� _ >N� y Tf�'� cry U L.dil g the IYay PR0.IECT P REM 11 ipNR R DRIVE z SER� SPRY' S AV �, MORGAN OA _ 3 O i—�f� '` SOPER 0 KIMBLE' E L�,ST 1 CIRCLE mA • UTBWAiE COURT S 0 S a CARRUTHERSDR RK AY CR PARK Sr FSC a ®9J VARIOUS LOCATIONS SURFACE ASPHALT ST McBHAILA x JIIRRE mi• CHPNS 0� �DODDS K �� O �z GS BA^uELiNEROAD Im oO.o ROSER CR SURFACE•ASPHALT ffi .¢ 'M '�y ANN 5T x o T.� L+?'COMBE DR z r PARKWAY AV - /MHO CTa�V - PINE w i p U BASELINE ROAD ❑ CL2013. DRAWING LOCATION SITE _ BASELINE ROAD SPICER I WELT BASELINE ROAD EAST I w Y . rc � �9�` .N DRAWN•DY: E1ISINSKI ClIECKEDBY. PROJECTNa. B�$ �® g6� ® 4q�� ANVI�:LE ? o m� Y DESIGNED DY: 'APPROVED BY. ORAWINGNIk I scAtd I'M& GnrE AIAY RDt3 LOCI () N r o O W 1 C) cn P O cn r- 0 n N L V N ME Q Municipality of Clarington 2013 Surface Asphalt, Various Locations Cost Apportionment Based on Low Bid Contract CL2013 -8 14- Jun -2013 -P ( J Baseline Rd Reconstruction Stevens Rd Extension Green Rd North Reconstruction High St Reconstruction First St Surface Asphalt Third St Surface Asphalt Fourth St Surface Asphalt Account Number 110 -32 -330- 83408 -7401 110 -32 -330- 83296 -7401 110 -32 -330- 83298 -7401 110 -32 -330- 83332 -7401 110 -32 -330- 83409 -7401 110 -32 -330- 83331 -7401 110- 32 -330- 83236 -7401 Construction Costs Contract CL2013 -8 Section'A' - Baseline Road $ 113,358.10 $ 113,358.10 Section'B'- Stevens Road $ 161,151.70 $ 161,151.70 Section'C' - Green Road $ 93,799.62 $ 93,799.62 Section 'D'- High Street $ 78,260.79 $ 78,260.79 Section'E' - First Street $ 17,665.56 $ 17,665.56 Section'F' - Third Street $ 19,141.58 $ 19,141.58 Section 'G' - Fourth Street $ 26,968.96 $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ $ 26,968.96 Sub -Total Construction Costs (excl. HST) $ 510,346.31 $" 113,358.10 $ 161,151.70 $ 93,799.62 $ 78,260.79 $ 17,665.56 $ 19,141.58 $ 26,968.96 Net HST @ 1.76% $ 8,982.10 $ 1,995.10 $ 2,836.27 $ 1,650.87 $ 1,377.39 $ 310.91 $ 336.90 $ 474.66 Total Construction Costs (Net of HST Rebate) $ 519,328.41 $ 115,353.20 $ 163,987.97 $ 95,450.49 $ 79,638.18 $ 17,976.47 $ 19,478.48 $ 27,443.62 Other Costs Material Testing (Estimate, Net of HST Rebat $ 10,176.00 $ 2,259.07 $ 3,205.44 $ 1,872.38 $ 1,556.93 $ 356.16 $ 386.69 $ 539.33 Pro-rated based on Low Bid. 10% Contingencies (Net of HST Rebate) $ 51,495.59 $ 11,387.73 $ 15,806.59 $ 9,677.13 $ 7,804.89 $ 1,667.37 $ 2,134.83 $ 3,017.05 Rounded Total Other Costs (Net of HST Rebate) $ 61,671.59 $ 13,646.80 $ 19,012.03 $ 11,549.51 $ 9,361.82 $ 2,023.53 $ 2,521.52 $ 3,556.38 Total Project Cost $ 581,000.00 $ 129,000.00 $ 183,000.00 $ 107,000.00 $ 89,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 31,000.00 Budget $ 750,000.00 $ 170,000.00 $ 206,000.00 $ 155,000.00 $ 130,000.00 $ 23,000.00 $ 31,000.00 $ 35,000.00 Estimated Unexpended Budget $ 169,000.00 $ 41,000.00 $ 23,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 41,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 4,000.00 -P ( J Sub June 24, 2013 COD- 018 -13 FIRE HALL #4 — COMMUNICATIONS TOWER CO- LOCATION AGREEMENT It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report COD - 018 -13 be received; 2. THAT a lease (co- location) agreement between the Municipality of Clarington and Bell Mobility for the installation and co- location of a communications tower at Fire Hall #4 Trulls Road, Courtice, be approved, subject to an agreement acceptable of the Municipal Solicitor; 3. THAT the funds required for the removal of the current antenna if necessary be taken from account # 110 -16- 162 - 81610 -7401; and 1, THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary agreement. Submitted b Y MM /JB /mc Nancy Taylor, BBA., CPA, C.A., Director of Finance/Treasurer Reviewed by: Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 IMF WT MM 1.1 The Trulls Road Fire Hall #4 currently has a 150 ft communications tower installed at the rear of the building. This tower is a self supporting tower and currently houses antennas used by the Municipality for transfer of signals between the Oshawa Fire Dispatch (Crysis System) the Municipal Administration Building, South Courtice Arena, Hampton Operations Depot and Courtice Community Centre. A photo of the current tower is provided as Attachment 1. 1.2 In the late fall of 2012, Standard Land Company Ltd.; representing Bell Mobility approached the Municipality with a proposal to install a tower at the Fire Hall on Trulls Road in Courtice. 1.3 The proposal provided for the installation of a new tower adjacent to the current tower location on the understanding that the Municipal antennas would be located on the new tower. On completion of the new installation the old Municipal Tower would be disassembled and available to the Municipality for installation at a future date and location, if required. 2.1 Staff was aware of the need for improved coverage by Bell Mobility in the Coutice area as a result of communication issues that have been evident since we started dealing with Bell Mobility in 2008. It is anticipated that the new installation will improve wireless communication in the Courtice area. 2.2 When first approached by Bell the first question asked was can the Bell antenna be installed on the current tower? However, due to the weight and type of antenna the current tower is to light to house the Bell antenna as well as the Municipal antenna currently in place. 2.3 The Bell proposal was to install new tower that was of sufficient strength to house not only Bell's antenna and the Municipality's but may support additional 3rd party antennas at some future date. 2.4 In situations involving antenna co- location there are concerns about interference with signals caused by conflicting signals. Although there is little likelyhood of this occurring in this situation due to the differing band width of the antennas this is being addressed in the agreement. It is understood that testing will be conducted before any installations to ensure signal interference is not an issue. Should interference occur after installation it is the responsibility of the offending party to correct the problem or remove the antenna. 2.5 The proposed installation falls within the current Council approved Municipal policy regarding Communications Towers in that co- location is preferred in order to minimize the number of towers located throughout Clarington. _, 2.6 The proposed tower, referred to as a monopole tower, will be more pleasing to the eye than the current tower. An illustration of the proposed tower is provided as Attachment 2. 2.7 Although the lease is not finalized there is a general understanding of the proposed content and the position of both parties under the proposed lease. However, this lease is still being developed to meet the Municipal requirements. 2.8 Due to the timing, Bell has a target installation date of September 2013. Given that Council will be in summer recess after July 2, 2013, staff is seeking approval of the installation, authority to complete negotiations and authority for the Mayor and Clerk to execute the agreement in order to meet Bell's timeline for a September start. K � 3.1 The co- location agreement will provide the Municipality with a revenue stream for up to 4 five year terms with an inflation factor built into the agreement. Provision is also made for the sharing of revenue generated by the addition of third party antenna at no cost to the Municipality. 3.2 The only cost to the Municipality should this agreement be approved will be the cost to dismantle the current antenna. This cost is estimated at $5000.00 and funds are available in account # 110 -16- 162 - 81610 -7401 IT Hardware. 3.3 Due to the confidential nature of the agreement particularly relating to the lease rates, this report indicates that the rates are fair and when viewed over the term of the agreement, substantial. More detail of the lease rates will be provided by means of a confidential memo distributed to all members of Council and interested staff. �Wel Ll 14491:4 :4 :110 159N 4.1 This report has been reviewed by Gord Weir, Director of Emergency Services and David Crome, Director of Planning Services who concur(s) with the recommendations. 5.1 The Municipality has received an offer to enter into a lease agreement involving the installation of a tower at our Trulls Road Fire Hall that will enable improved communications and coverage of wireless capability without adding additional towers to the area. This installation will accommodate our current antenna and will result in a steady revenue stream for a period of up to 20 years. In view of the co- location opportunity and the addition of a revenue source it is recommended that the lease agreement be pursued and finalized. 14 -10 ONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC P The recommendations contained in this report conform to the general intent of the following priorities of the Strategic Plan: Promoting economic development X Maintaining financial stability X Connecting Clarington Promoting green initiatives Investing in infrastructure Showcasing our community Not in conformity with Strategic Plan Staff Contact: Jerry Barber, Manager, Purchasing Services Attachments: Attachment 1 - Photo of the current Trulls Road Tower Attachment 2 - Photo of the proposed monopole tower 14 -11 ATTACHMENT # 1 TO REPORT CO®- 013 -13 Curren T6'ulls Road Tower IGO foot Wdwaovver 4 -12 ATTACHMENT # 2 TO REPORT COD - 018 -13 Proposed Monopole Tower 46 Metres 14 -13 Clarington REPOR' Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 24, 2013 Resolution By-law #: Report: CAO- 006 -13 File #: Subject: "VALUE ADDED SERVICE" AUDIT It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CAO- 006 -13 be received for information. Submitted by: Franklin Wu, M.A.O.M. Chief Administrative Officer CC:FW CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 17 -1 REPORT NO.: CAO- 006 -13 PAGE 2 1. PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this report is to respond to Resolution #GPA- 336 -13 of May 27th .1 THAT Staff be directed to prepare a report to the General Purpose and Administration Committee before summer recess on how a "Value Added Service" audit can be performed with a view to questioning if certain services can be subcontracted." QNNNFRTIWI-- B 2.1 Our Understanding of "Value Added Service Audit" In our research on municipal literature and practice we were unable to find a clear definition of "value added service audit ". However, given the context of the discussion and the face value of the term, we assume it to mean a service delivery review. This term is defined in the municipal sector as "an evaluation process in which a specific service is systematically reviewed to determine the most appropriate way to provide it ". This is the term and definition used in Making Choices: A Guide to Service Delivery Review for Municipal Councillors and Senior Staff, a joint publication of four Ontario municipal organizations: The Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario, the Municipal Finance Officers' Association of Ontario and the Ontario Municipal Administrators' Association. 2.2 Best Practices for Undertaking Municipal Service Delivery Reviews The review process set out in the Guide referenced above "draw on best practices" from processes tested in Ontario and internationally. The basic framework set out in that Guide is shown in Attachment 1 and it suggests that a service delivery review answer the following 10 questions: 1. Do we really need to continue to be in this business /service? 2. What do citizens expect of the service and what outcomes does Council want for the service? 3. How does current performance compare to expected performance? 4. Do the activities logically lead to the expected outcomes? 5. How is demand for the service being managed? 6. What are the full costs and benefits of the service? 7. How can benefits and outputs of the service be increased? 8. How can the number and costs of inputs be decreased? 9. What are the alternative ways of delivering the service? 10. How can a service change best be managed, implemented and communicated? iii% 2.3 Options for How to Undertake a Review There are two broad options for how to undertake a review: (a) contract a consultant to undertake the review or (b) provide the review internally. The matter posed by the resolution — questioning whether certain services should be subcontracted - would be a matter that either a consultant or an internal review could address. This is Question #9 above and "Stage 4 Option Two" of the attached flow chart. Experience elsewhere revealed that the key considerations in choosing whether to contract a consultant to undertake a review or to undertake it internally tend to be: 1. impartiality 2. cost 3. expertise 4. time 3.1 Level of Impartiality Expected The level of impartiality expected in carrying out these reviews is a key consideration in choosing whether to contract a consultant to carry them out or conduct them internally. Of course, having a party independent of the Department can bring greater acceptance of the results of the review by some stakeholders, regardless of whether maintaining the status quo or something close to it or far from it is suggested by the review. It limits perceptions of a biased review that may be held if the review is provided internally. 3.2 Cost of the Review There are few municipalities of Clarington's population size and responsibilities that have undertaken a service delivery review. Three examples were found: Grey County (pop. approx. 85,000) hired a consultant at cost of about $92,000 to undertake a review of its transportation services that went into organizational matters, businesses process as well as matters of contracting out certain components. It is estimated that an equivalent or greater amount of internal staff time was also devoted to supporting this work, e.g., information collection, analysis, reporting, project management over about a two year period. The County has since decided to allocate $75,000 annually for regular departmental reviews. ® Port Hope (pop. approx 16,500) using its own staff undertook a review of a wide range of services (using some of the 10 questions) over a 14 month period. They note that the cost of the review is difficult to ascertain, given it was done in -house and literally almost all of the 17 -3 791-TCTAM Department Heads, managers, supervisors and front line staff were involved in the review — so a lot of man hours over and above regular work flows. This review includes suggestions that in turn there be a review of contracting out in two areas: (1) the marina ( "to review opportunities for privatization or contracting the service or a partnership') and (2) outsourcing of funeral set up service at non - municipal cemeteries. ® Brockville (pop. approx. 20,000) hired 'a consultant at a $75,000 cost to conduct a review primarily focussed on three areas: general administration, fire services and economic development. Contracting -out was not examined in these reviews. This review took about six months. 3.3 Expertise Closely related to cost is the availability of in -house expertise.if internal review is the preferred option. Experience elsewhere indicates that expertise is required in: program evaluation, financial analysis, operational analysis, cost accounting, service management and labour relations. This type of expertise needs to be come in tandem with management skills required to assess how best to ensure efficiency and effectiveness in service delivery. Clarington does not have any staff with all of the above skill set and experience to undertake service delivery reviews. However, if using a team approach drawing on the expertise from various departments, then undertaking an individual service delivery may be doable depending on the time and timing of the review and the ability to forego other work. 3.4 Time Required to Undertake the Review The amount of time required for the review is also an important and interrelated consideration. The amount of time involved is a function of (1) the scope of the review (many or just one service), (2) the number and nature of the questions being asked (the 10 questions from the Guide or something more or less than that) and (3) the scale and complexity of the particular service(s) under review. The time required for the three examples are noted in 3.2 above. More generally, it has been found that for municipalities of any size: ® that contract a consultant to do a comprehensive review, generally undertake them over the course of one to two years, although the time required varies based on availability of municipal staff to provide background information, data requested by consultants, the complexity of the service under review and availability of comparable data. 17 -4 ® that contract a consultant to review one service can complete it in as little as 90 days and as long as a year. Of course the cost the municipality is willing to pay can also determine the amount of time to undertake the review, with a trade -off to some extent between time and money. ® that choose to do an internally led review focussed on one service have ranged in time from a few to several months depending on the complexity of the review. Again, unlike with a consultant, all the municipal staff expertise is not able to be pulled off exclusively or all at the same time to focus on the review. 4.1 This report has set out to answer the question about how to undertake service delivery reviews. There are two broad options: (a) contract a consultant to undertake the review or (b) provide the review internally provided it is a single service that is to be reviewed. 4.2 If Council wishes to undertake a review, the next steps will be to' identify a particular service(s) to be reviewed, the questions it would seek to have answered by the review, whether to undertake the review using a consultant or internally and the municipal cost /time it is willing to incur to undertake a review. 4.3 Service delivery reviews are time and resource intensive exercises and may involve sensitive local issues with accountability resting with Council for determining the service(s) to be reviewed, the desired service levels and performance standards (against which the service delivery options would be assessed) and ultimately deciding whether to adopt the review's recommendations in whole or in part. Before beginning a review, Council must be committed to seeing it through, provide the necessary resources, give staff clear direction and wholeheartedly support the process. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — The recommendations contained in this report conform to the following priorities of the Strategic Plan: Promoting economic development X Maintaining financial stability X Connecting Clarington Promoting green initiatives Investing in infrastructure Showcasing our community Not in conformity with Strategic Plan Staff Contact: Curry Clifford, MPA, CMO, Corporate Initiatives Officer Attachment 1 - Flow Chart For Service Delivery Reviews 17 -5 v I C" Getting Organized For Service Delivery Review Establish Performance 2Standayds Outcomes and Service I ' �. Understand And Evaluate �, m Current Performance U� t5/� How does current performance compare to your performance targets? ° What is current performance versus targets? ° Do outputs logically lead to preferred outcomes? How is demand being managed? ° What are the full costs & benefits? How efficient is the service? Develop performance measures Set performance targets Option One uConsider Internal Improvements Could internal improvements be made in a cost - effective mannerto meetthe desired service levels and outcomes? Increase the number of benefits Increase the number of outputs Decrease the number of inputs ° Decrease the cost of inputs If internal improvements are successful in achieving service targets and performance outcomes, go to Stage 6. If they are not, go to Stage 4, Option 2 O 11 K How Mal vt For Service DeUvery Review, Option Two lnvestigate Other Feasible VD Service Delivery Methods Select Service Provider � r$ implement, Evaluate and Report_ Identify range of delivery methods Direct delivery ° Purchase of services (including in -house bids) ° Municipal business corporations Municipal service boards and other local entities Partnerships ° Licensing Privatization Identifybarriersto changing methods Assess suitability of feasible methods Use thefour analytical tools ftom Stage 3 to analyze the suitable methods Define scope of work Prepare and circulate bid document Evaluate bids Prepare and negotiate the contract Execute implementation plan for delivery of the service Implement Evaluate Report on any improvements and barriers to improvements as per section 300 of Municipal Act 2001 � a m o a D m oz 0 0 z m O N w F° 0 Clarington R, , CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICI Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: June 24, 2013 Resolution : By -law : Report : CAO- 007 -13 File #: Subject: Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsoort Park It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CAO- 007 -13 be received for information. Submitted by: 0 - t ~� Franklin Wu Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 17 -7 r • �! II 1.1 In August 2012, Republic Live Inc. successfully staged its first Boots & Hearts Music Festival at Canadian Tire Motorsport Park. A second Festival is scheduled to take place August 1 - 4, 2013. 1.2 The purpose of this Report is to provide Council with an update regarding the 2013 Festival. �� =0 7ITi 1 IT1I A ►l>f 2.1 All of the individuals and companies responsible for organizing the Festival (primarily Republic Live Inc.) have been in discussions with Municipal staff, Durham Regional Police Service, Regional Health Department, Lakeridge Health, and St. John's Ambulance Service for several months. 2.2 A Special Event Permit under By -law No. 91 -56 will be needed in order for the Festival to proceed. This Permit will not be issued unless and until several matters have been satisfactorily addressed including, ® signed agreement with DRPS respecting additional police protection services (with security deposit); ® fire safety plan; ® signed agreement with Clarington Emergency & Fire Services respecting the delivery of fire protection services (with security deposit); ® confirmation from the Region's Medical Office of Health that all public health and sanitation requirements are have been met; ® property damage deposit; ® signed agreement to monitor sound levels; ® evidence of appropriate insurance; and ® an indemnification agreement with the Municipality. 2.3 At this point, all discussions with the Festival organizers have been productive and staff anticipate that the Special Event Permit will be issued on or before July 12, 2013. 2.4 In addition to the Special Events Permit, a Fireworks Permit was requested. On February 11, 2013, Council approved the issuance of this Permit. 2.5 On February 11, 2013, Council also granted a temporary variance to the Noise By -law to allow for a 60 dBA maximum level of audible sound between Friday, August 2 to Sunday, August 4, 2013, during the hours of midnight and 2:00 a. m. for the 2013 Festival when the secondary stage will be in operation. The highest level of sound measured at the 2012 Festival was 56.4 dBA from the main stage on the Saturday night. IN A •' I P, • A 9 9-11 • 11 2.6 In May of this year, staff became aware of plans by the Festival's organizers to provide camping for Festival guests on a piece of property owned by Ryeland Farms approximately 2 kilometres south of the Park (Parcel 2 on Attachment No. 1) and run regular shuttle buses to and from the Park. In a letter dated May 15, 2013, the Municipal Clerk advised Republic Live that the Municipality's zoning by- laws did not permit camping anywhere other than in the Park. Republic Live advised staff that they were unaware of the zoning restriction, and offered to immediately do whatever was necessary to correct the oversight. , 2.7 On June 10, 2013, Republic Live applied for an amendment to Zoning By -law 2005 -109 to temporarily (three years) allow certain properties to be used for outdoor camping and parking in connection with the Boots & Hearts Music Festival (ZBA 2013 - 0016). The owners of the properties (Darclarke Properties Corp. and Ryeland Farms) consented to the submission of the application. The lands included in the application are Shown in Attachment No. 1. Parcel 1 is owned by Darclarke Properties Corp. Parcels 2 and 3 are owned by Ryeland Farms. Approximately 2,000 tent sites and 1,500 day parking spots can be located on Parcel 1. Approximately 2,000 tent camping sites and 500 RV camping sites can be located on Parcel 2. Parcel 3 is intended to be used for camping in subsequent years. 2.8 Given the timeframes associated with processing a rezoning application (i.e. 30 days to review the application to determine whether it is complete, a minimum of 21 days' notice prior to the required statutory public meeting, and a recommendation report following the public meeting), it is not possible to bring a recommendation report on the application to Council before the 2013 Festival occurs. 2.9 Consistent with normal practice, the Municipality will not pursue by -law charges relating to the zoning issue pending the outcome of the rezoning application. 2.10 Given all that has happened, it is apparent that the Darclarke Properties and Ryeland Farms properties are going to be used for camping. In order to protect public safety and other Municipal interests, staff are working with Republic Live to ensure that, (a) appropriate arrangements are made through Engineering Services (Road Closure Permit) to ensure that the movement of pedestrians, shuttle buses and local traffic along Mosport Road is properly managed; (b) there is adequate policing in all camping areas and along the shuttle route; and (c) the fire plan addresses issues related to all camping areas and shuttle route to the satisfaction of Clarington Emergency & Fire Services. 17 -9 2.11 Discussions are on -going respecting the Road Closure Permit. As part of this Permit, Republic Live will have to provide additional insurance and post additional security respecting the use of, and possible damage to, the portion of Mosport Road that is to be temporarily closed. 2.12 Republic Live has advised staff that its intention is to see this event grow and perhaps extend over a period of two weekends in the future. They have committed to filing in the fall of this year all land use planning applications that may be required to facilitate their long term plans. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN - Not applicable Attachment No. 1: Location Map 17 -10 e Property Location Map (CDarke) N x Boots and Hea is Musics Festival Owners: Canadian Motorsport Ventures Parcel 1, Darclarke Properties Corp Parcel 2, Ryeland Farms Parcel 3, Ryeland Farms D D n 2 m z z O 0 To: Mayor Foster and Members of Council From: Anne Greentree, Deputy Clerk Date: June 21, 2013 Subject: GENERAL PURPOSE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA — JUNE 24, 2013 — UPDATE File: C05.GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION Please be advised of the following amendments to the GPA agenda for the meeting to be held on Monday, June 24, 2013: 6. DELEGATIONS See attached Final List. (Attachment #1) 8. (d) Report PSD- 043 -13 Please find attached a replacement page for Page 2 and 3 of Report PSD- 043 -13 (Attachment #2) 13. (b) Appointment to the Sustainable Clarington Community Advisory Committee After forwarding information to the School Boards, the Municipal Clerk's Department received the attached confidential application from Kira Nowick (Rigelhof) as a youth representative on the Committee, for a term concurrent with the term of Council. (Attachment #3) 19. (a) Marriage Ceremony — October 26, 2013 Request to perform a civil marriage service on October 26, 2013 at the Deer Creek G ff an an .pit Facility. (Attachment #4) A ne Grreentree, Deputy Clerk AG /jeg cc: F. Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Department Heads CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 F 905- 623 -6506 Attachment #1 of Update Memo FINAL LIST GPA Meeting: June 24, 2013 (a) Michael Hackenberger, Co- Owner, Bowmanville Zoo, Regarding Noise Complaints and Giraffes (b) Kenneth Kerrigan Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (c) Leslie Kerrigan Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (d) Jarett Hebert Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (e) Tricia Hebert Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (f) Brian Crow, Adam Breitkreuz, Shannon McNevan, Chris Paterson, Republic Live, Regarding Report CAO- 007 -13, Boots & Hearts Music Festival 2013 Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (g) Shirley Crago Regarding Clarington Energy Park (h) George Franklin Regarding Report PSD- 044 -13, Noise Fence for Lots on West Side of Vivian Drive (i) Carolyn Molinari, Planner, CM Planning Inc., on behalf of Fourteen Estates Ltd., Regarding Report EGD- 023 -13, Proposal to Close and Convey Two Adjoining Right -of -Ways Situated in Lot 17 Concession 2, Former Township Of Darlington (Hampton) Based on the requirements of the Growth Plan and the Regional Official Plan: • Clarington is required to plan for a 72% increase in urban population (additional 52,000 people), which is approximately 22,000 new residential units. • Clarington is required to plan for approximately 6,200 intensification units within the 2006 Built Boundary as defined by the Province between 2015 and 2031 • Even though the Municipality is required to Plan on this basis, the growth figures would appear to be optimistic based on previous experience • Based on Hemson's population and housing for Clarington and the analysis in this report, future growth will be distributed as follows: o Courtice 22% o Bowmanville 53% 0 Newcastle 21% o Orono /Rural 4% • Average annual population growth rates (rounded) through the five year intervals are as follows: 0 2006 -2011 1400 0 2011 -2016 1900 0 2016 -2021 2500 0 2021 -2026 2800 0 2026-2031 3300 Designated Greenfield Areas • Designated Greenfield Areas are those lands designated for urban growth but not occupied as of June 2006. These include: o Lands in draft approved plans of subdivision 0 Lands in plans of subdivision under construction but not occupied as of June 2006 o Lands where homes have been constructed since 2006 o Land with a development proposal under consideration o Vacant lands currently farmed but inside the urban boundary • There are 13,500 new residential units in Greenfield Areas required to conform. These are to be distributed as follows: 0 Courtice - 2,400 0 Bowmanville - 8,000 0 Newcastle - 3,100 REPORT • 47% of the required units to 2031 are already in the development pipeline (vacant lots, draft approved or proposed units total 9,306 for the Urban Areas). This is equal to approximately 10 years of supply. • Average annual growth rates (rounded) for new housing through the five year intervals are as follows: 0 2006 -2011 600 0 2011 -2016 750 0 2016 -2021 1000 0 2021 -2026 1100 0 2026 -2031 1200 Intensification • Intensification units are any units constructed within the Built Boundary • The Provincial methodology for the Built Boundary has made Clarington's job easier as larger tracts of primarily vacant land were included in the Built Boundary, including lands on the west side of Lambs Road (Far Sight Investments and the Training School /Camp 30 lands), the Bowmanville waterfront, Courtice Town Centre) • Intensification Areas are to be identified to accommodate the majority of the intensification and include Town Centres, Regional Corridors, Waterfront Places and Transit Stations • Intensification units are proposed to be distributed between Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle on the same ratio as their share of population at 2031 but adjusted to account for the lack of intensification sites in Newcastle • Intensification units planned for each community are: 0 Courtice - 2100 o Bowmanville - 3600 o Newcastle - 500 Land Supply The slower than projected growth since 1996 (30,000 fewer people), the higher densities that are now being implemented in Newcastle than planned for in the 1996 Official Plan and the requirements of the Growth Plan (32% of the future units between 2015 and 2031 being within the Built Boundary) results in minimal additional land supply required prior to 2031. Urban Area unit growth from 2013 -2031 was distributed on the basis of the Region's total household growth as follows: Urban Area Courtice Bowmanville Newcastle Total Built-up Area Units 2,055 3,602 524 6,181 Designated Greenfield Units 2,643 7,763 3,056 13,462 Total 4,698 11,365 3,580 19,643 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE RESOLUTION # DATE June 24 2013 • 00 SECONDED BY ATTACHMENT # TO WHEREAS on December 13, 2004, Council passed By -law 2004 -253 to "opt in" to providing civil marriage services; AND WHEREAS the authority to provide the civil marriage services extended to those services held Monday to Friday in the Municipal Administrative Centre only; AND WHEREAS the fee for civil marriages was set at $250 to cover the cost of staff time and use of the Municipal Administrative Centre; AND WHEREAS the Deputy Clerk has received a request to perform a civil marriage service outside of the parameters set by By -law 2004 -253; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON THAT the Deputy Clerk be authorized to perform a civil marriage service on October 26, 2013, at Deer Creek Golf and Banquet Facility, 2700 Audley Road North, Ajax, Ontario; THAT the $250 fee be waived in these instances; and THAT the appropriate by -law be forwarded to Council. Application By: Stephen Krezanowski An application to rezone lands to facilitate the severance of a lot Claringmn Planning Services Department rV Property Location Map(Courtice) 8 3359 e 3351 6 3339 Subject Sites 3325 GEORC£REVND�LS DR S 3301 li 8 � a 3289 6 e oR Cl) 94.Orn ❑ 3265 Q Subject Site Q ® Proposed Severance LLI U 3233 H [X O U ZBA 2013-0015 Zoning By-law Amendment 3201 Applicant: Stephen Krezanowski 3191 — d t q y y Mir rya Subject Property �7 - , ..err,► K _ Potential Future Severed Lot ` r ,p dt Till,' � GECJR6E-F EYNGLDS DFr YNoo t) ' R ; y r SKINNER C F e V21 i Y" Y GLENVIEVV IN LU r , r Hwy Q. h Low Density Residential `•t - ;,a. a' N 0 Medium Density Residential Environmental Protection Areas Provincially Significant Wetland ®Existing Residential CS Future Convenience Store 18T-94027 �k y- R EP 0 o= W U 0!Ir O 0 y 4° k+� Special Study Fe Y Area 7 h Yw �• �, Sep�cin Comfc�or (Pe eStLTrart) •°+'C'ti.h�^n"` Y °'.a � �"' '+`mow.t ... � � � Potential Severed Lot yi'0•�:1 i"•+A 0.5m 94.0m �� :mow „� t ti 4 ^� °�"° ■ ■ CS "Y Subject Lands Owned By Krezanowski Future Alignment Of George Reynolds Drive I3 k.k•t« N .�"1 tl,Ya yi�. EXTRACT FROM HANCOCK NEIGHBOURHOOD DESIGN _ti.w� Agency/Staff comments • Public input • Planning comments 1 S •t e ti photos L :1 F i5`ft X rV Property Location Map(Courtice) 8 3359 e 3351 6 3339 Subject Sites 3325 GEORC£REVND�LS DR S 3301 li 8 � a 3289 6 e oR Cl) 94.Orn ❑ 3265 Q Subject Site Q ® Proposed Severance LLI U 3233 H [X O U ZBA 2013-0015 Zoning By-law Amendment 3201 Applicant: Stephen Krezanowski 3191 9015 Mosport Road Kerrigan Family `r v Cos s Submitted by: Ken Kerrigan For the General Purpose and Administration Committee June 24, 2013. CTMP outgrows venue engulfing rivate land p Note: ' OF r yr s� i Parcel 2 and 3 if fully . . occupied could hold an estimated 10,000 sites 90 (4-8 per site = 40,00( •• '• to 80,000 campers ) based on the 15'x25' lot size stated on the B&H Narrow single Web site. lane ONLY access Parcel 2-a Conclusion... B&H is simply too large for CTMP � Parcel 2-b too— y FiTw' , i t v. � F South end of-park Home is completely Wilmot creek & well isolated Single lane Mosport road 9015 Home Neighbor , Start of campground s Parcel 2a Parcel 2b r To Mosport road - ' -r - - Mosport road from my home Wilmot creek ,& well water - � Neighbor _ My Home Home to Mosport Road Neighbor Concession i to start of c Concessi access - - -' Camp, CTMP & Home Start of Campsite � ��•-��rcel 3 Parcel 2b Home Extreme width of this is amazing Massive size of parcel 2h 3 -40 Pfrom ome parcel 2b to parcel 2a Tree,de-lir�abing Viand prep'ar�tio.n (CTM :& h ) .w s�a.rted iri'the I�te fall of 2012 . j_ Fes. This was a corn field last year ; " Parcel 1 Sipe ofp�rcel 2a �%��; °�N� � A�cess'to MoSpor�road ` k -`View back to start of carry `t ite ...t�� NEW---4 - 2U� -. j MoXo _ Mosport Roa i e buses s and personal access. Neighbor j Which way ? a My Home Neighbor MyHome Based on less than %2 of the road available and 4 people wide with 5 ` a' to 6 feet between each foursome ' the line will be between 4 and 5 Parcels 2&3 III ' kilometres long ... (Imagine 20-50 THOUSAND kard - That's larger than Bowmanville I I) g . k .. Ares• r - i ' Conc -_8 Issues, Risks & Objections • CTMP sold out and now growing beyond CTMP for additional profit (greed) • Planning for the 'Range' started last fall not a month ago, can't be trusted • The application wants 6 days/ 5 nights of camping (Not including prep time) in August to grow into an annual event over multiple weekends and tens of thousands of more campers. NOT acceptable, you imprison my family and risk our safety on every occasion. • No environmental assessment has been done (area of HIGH AQUIFER Vulnerability), possible contamination of my well water, the moraine and possibly severe damage to my property • No curfew, alcohol permitted leading to unpredictable behaviour through all hours • Impossible access from campsite on Mosport road to CTMP leading to thousands of campers walking at all hours and many inebriated on a public road (Mosport). Thousands of ILLEGALLY intoxicated campers who could be charged and fined. • EMS and personal access severely restricted, there is NO other access other than Mosport Road to my property. Any outbreak will leave us completed isolated.... Absolutely unacceptable to put us in a potentially dangerous situation. • I've written John O'Toole MPP, MOE, ORTA, Newspapers, councillors and more ... . • BOTTOM LINE — this application would infringe on my property rights and endanger our personal health (water) and safety and should NOT be permited �riir OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW Compass to our�"uture Growth Management F± Draft Land Budget Planning Services Department cllmingwn June 24tH, 2013 Overview l�f Growing planning challenges ; =` Provincial Growth Plan policies aim to: curb urban sprawl, - "" revitalize downtowns, create complete communities, r protect natural resources and agriculture r ��i'o and increase housing and transportation choices. ��a n ""i Ililll q. - 1II - �Mli Throu h com act oriented develo ment A;� `Y' #� p, g p p �.. I' Nil Land Budget Analysis - Policy Basis DURHAM ftwi6 ��o�AL OFFICIAL PLAN OFFICIAL PLAN i d y i Population Forecasts Hierarchy , 2031 GROWTH PLAN Durham Region Share: 960,000 people DURHAM REGION Clarington Share: OFFICIAL PLAN 140,340 people CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN forecasts Courtice Bowmanville Newcastle Orono/Rural- 367600 647200 197300 207300 mmmmmmmmmwmmm loll Durham Region Official Plan Forecasts Clarington 2011 2031 Growth % Change from 2011 to 2031 Urban Population 72,705 124,685 51 ,980 72% Rural Population 15,275 15,655 380 2% Total Population 879980 1409340 52,360 60% Households 309225 529120 21 ,895 72% Employment 229575 389420 15,845 70% do Designated _ ;$ r • . , Greenfield Area Built-Up Area i Intensification : • ' . Area 6, 181 32% r IV -Built-Up Area _ "ems I .01 -•�. \ -. - , ! r Nil Forecasted Units to 2031 Intensification Greenfield 1ntensificatiMrw6,jL8jL units Greenfield Target Forecast Committed and U 3039 �� Proposed 49% se Remaining 3442 Remaining 7� 195 Intensification 51% Greenfield 53% mmmmmmmmmmmwmOmw loll Number of years current committed and proposed (9 , 247) units will last 6 years cLir�i 5 years Bow ma ivi c, years 1 years 11 Newcast e 9 years 13 years 3 years Oron'D/RL,ral y ars E rii7ki7 13 years 10 ye rs 2013 2015 2D17 2019 201 2C'2.} 20 H 102-7 "-02,D 2031 1 Based on 11) yejraverage ■ Based o n fie son's U n I o e(,%Ii"Il There are no easy ways to Land Budget "This is that critical point in the planning process where the planning staff hashes out the issues so that they are all on the same page." Nil Current Supply of Gross Developable Land ( ha ) , as of January 2013 Total remaining units: 10,337 300 274 ha Total land available: 665 ha 50 00 194 ha -, U) 0 150 MBuilt-Up Area (D r ■GreenField 100 - 78 a 67 ha 5j47ha 1 5 han Courtice Bownianville Newcastle Land Supply vs. Demand to 2031 Built - Up Area ■ Land Supply Lana Required 2031 9Q So S 70 6o Go 40 40 a� _ 3 20 10 0 Courtice Bowman ille Newcastle Land Supply vs. Demand to 2031 Greenfield Area Land Supply Land Required 2031 300 274 274 250 200 194 a) 150 109 a) 1+D� — 67 67 50 0 Courtice Bowmanville Newcastle 1110:�:i'i1i�lIL:17�I1�1■■�If■��r:GYiiar_�� s�.y ■ i._ �.. n r .■ URBAN STRUCTURE �Li m�a�114``l1 �11►.r�i1 IIN - ■'__■ 111116111' �■�til= 111�1{1� 5 111111 F J ` � I - �� s � � N n 1 � ■, • *Growth _= M. Forecasts 2031 Population 14700 ■ IeG�, • 71 ' • ■sl : • � y MA LEAH fl,AUNUS CR IRT B LAND WO [GAUD w GATE nv� lle f 0 l URBAN 'SEW IN CON SI A c r '--v z v (12 LU STRUCTURE +`, L L O r cc 0 a Z W Z F C ON S RE Growth - J� 1 Forecasts2031 � - i Intensification 3,602 units - Greenfield 7, 63 units Total units 11, 365 OESIGNGTEG GREENRIELG B REi. -r/ REGIONAL CORRIDOR aREGIORRL C-RE BOWMANVILLE TRRRSR STATION BUILT BOUNDARY ®:3E ewcM ie I a Z p IY Y 0 c� 0 URBANIW' 0 0 J S RE T ES STRUCTURE C 7-----� °o Lu r lI � LU m _j p I� m tc p x� ray a A ROWVIE ROAD Growth �2 0 Forecasts Population 141 1 1 _ v 0 1 Intensification 524 units ' Y o J Greenfield 3,056 units N Total units 3, 580 BUILTIIPAREA DESIGNATED GREENFIELD AREA 0 REGIDNALCENTRE NEWCASTLE VILLAGE O WATERFRONT PLACES BUILT BOUNDARY ®EMPLOYMENT LANDS Nil Managing Growth : Secondary Plan Policies and Phasing Development of Greenfield Areas that are greater than approximately 20 hectares shall only proceed in accordance with an approved Secondary Plan. Clarington will also have to develop more detailed phasing policies to guide the Secondary Planning process including: the consideration of the amount of available land infrastructure and public facilities costs fiscal capacity of the municipality Chattenges Accommodating intensification will be a challenge for Clarington Municipality will need to more than double its Intensification rate to meet the Region's targets community acceptance and support for compact development Large portion of the committed Greenfield (draft approved and proposed) development does not have sufficient services Overall . . . . Clarington has sufficient land to accommodate the Regional Official Plan population forecasts and intensification targets for the Community. Adoption of sustainable land development principles and building practices is vital to reducing the potential environmental pressures of growth. There will be a need for strong urban design polices to ensure community character is protected and enhanced. r An application to rezone lands to facilitate the severance of a �oo°� a N 8 3359 3351 6 3339 3325 3301 8 � 3289 0 CO 94. Om Q 3265 Of lJ1 U H 3233 O U 3201 3191 Property Location Map (Courtice) IV I —� T_ — — LI Subject Sites Q Subject Site ® Proposed Severance ZBA 2013 -0015 Zoning By -law Amendment Applicant: Stephen Krezanowski \ 4 '1., cci * �• � r< �.'� +, '�' •. tY'�!! �.�si:^I� `fie :.. y4, '. Dui•' _ �, � � rte. ► , ' . 11, wo 3 r 91219199 Property Location Map (Courtice) 0 N 8 3359 3351 L � — — 6 3339 Subject , Sites 3325 3301 — - 5 3289 � M 94.Om Subject SISi: t e Q 3265 0 ® Proposed Se verance H W U 3233 D O U ZBA 2013 -0015 Zoning By -law Amendment 3201 Applicant: Stephen Krezanowski 3191 �t 9015 Mosport Road Kerrigan Family Submitted by: Ken Kerrigan For the General Purpose and Administration Committee June 24, 2013. CTMP outgrows venue engulfing private land Note: Parcel 2 and 3 if fully occupied could hold an estimated 10,000 sites (4 -8 per site = 40,000 to 80,000 campers) based on the 15'x25' lot size stated on the B &H Web site. Conclusion... B &H is simply too large for CTMP ------------------- v Narrow single ; lane ONLY access •------------- - - - - -� Nome Location Home to Mosporl Road Concession 8 to start of campsite Massive size of parcel 2b a 3 I This was a corn field last year ! a - Parcel 2a View of ONLY 10,000 [50 %1 of the campers leaning at the end of the concert Issues, R!SkS a Objections • CTMP sold out and now growing beyond CTMP for additional profit (greed) • Planning for the `Range' started last fall not a month ago, can't be trusted • The application wants 6 days/ 5 nights of camping (Not including prep time) in August to grow into an annual event over multiple weekends and tens of thousands of more campers. NOT acceptable, you imprison my family and risk our safety on every occasion. • No environmental assessment has been done (area of HIGH AQUIFER Vulnerability), possible contamination of my well water, the moraine and possibly severe damage to my property • No curfew, alcohol permitted leading to unpredictable behaviour through all hours • Impossible access from campsite on Mosport road to CTMP leading to thousands of campers walking at all hours and many inebriated on a public road (Mosport). Thousands of ILLEGALLY intoxicated campers who could be charged and fined. • EMS and personal access severely restricted, there is NO other access other than Mosport Road to my property. Any outbreak will leave us completed isolated.... Absolutely unacceptable to put us in a potentially dangerous situation. • I've written John O'Toole MPP, MOE, ORTA, Newspapers, councillors and more .... • BOTTOM LINE — this application would infringe on my property rights and endanger our personal health (water) and safety and should NOT be permited 1 lc.Lillilil6 LJL,l V JL%,k J Lt,.IGLl 1.1116111 Clar;wgtoit June 24th, 2013 �JyBrVTSW/ o Growing plannong challenges o Provincial Growth Plan policies aim to: acurb urban sprawl, revitalize downtowns, ®create complete communities, protect natural resources and agriculture and oncrease housong and transportation choices. Through compact oriented development Land Budget Analysis - Policy Basro.11--*.", Gmwth Plan Twit YtIYn J f,t,a �•�tn r_4.4:tl5i1 �:. DURHAM REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN C6^.36UJ<T164 .� JuuEw.lji, P U N I C I V A: I I Y 0 I A - F OFFICIAL PLAN t,�l1�IiP~dl➢i� Population Forecasts Hierarchy, 2031 GROVAITH PLAN DURHAM REGION OFFICIAL PLAN CLARIN T CAN OFFDCIAL PLAN forecasts Courtice 36,600 .• 64,200 It . rn Regio 960,000 people Claringtcn Share- 140,340 pecp e Newcastle 19,300 Orono /Rural: 20,300 Durham Official Plan Clarington 2011 2031 Growth % Change from 2011 to 2031 Urban Population Rural Population 721705 15,275 124,685 15,655 51,980 380 72% 2% Total Population 87,980 1409340 52,360 60% Households 30,225 523120 213895 72% Employment 229575 389420 15,845 70% Lo r a, in }T (e- ��1 arnJ 13 u i fit- U A � Greenfield density A minimum of 40 % of 50 people /jobs per ha residential building permits within the Built -Up Area Greenfield Development I,_FD'esignated 13) 462 units ree-nfield Area 68% � 4.4--; tA�' r- daN 4jj1t 50 77 Intensification within Built -up Area 6,181 Units 32% �o��c Units to 2031 Committed and 3,039 Proposed 49% Remaining 3,142 Intensification 51% Greenfield Number of years current committed and proposed (9,2-47) units IM last Courtice Bol, winviIIe 01roro'R iraI 3 201.9 11011 2'Oj9 7021 )'02; ) 025 2101"7 2029 2031 Dosed on 10 year average ■ Based on Hemson's Unitforecast 9 years There ar- - .t "This is that cr of -ica� point on the planning process where the p�anniing stare hashes out -the issues so that they are all on the same page." .... .tip' � �•::;� ti_�s� _•�. .a,[�5:1i;�;.,� ri..�, Current Supply of Gross Develo I(E a� �a h as of January 20013 -50 cz M N150 No FUM ;(-) M 194 ha Total remaining unite 10,337 274 ha Total land available: 665 ha 47 ha P9 C'ourtice B01VII1a11ville 67 ha l 5 ha Newcastle ■Euilt -Up Area ®t TreenField Lan,d, Supp�y vs.- Demand to 2031 go 80 70 6o Cn 50 M 40 CD r 30 20 10 0 Land Supply Land Required 2031 Courtice Bowman ille Newcastle fi Dem aid to 1 L-7 ram 11 � t_4�'r m 250 200 150 50 E Land Supply Land Required 2031 67 67 Courtice Bowmanville Newcastle ■IIC�i7JS i�'iiLrl�:T.1111�j1��If S11�ZIV:�6_ �� _ �r �� — ■: �Illuli;�T Ii `I {I�u a ull►f1'll ON MOM f o .' Will i 1 1"24 1 Fin Al gip,1 1111%VJLJL7111VQ1.1V11 _i."lJc W U Z W ❑ O a 1�\ i V CE6S L- ^/ REGIO ATED CREENFIELDARE. 0. �OIOR.L CORRIDOR PGGONAL CGMRf BOWMANVILLE TR,RSR ST.TRH � W.TBIF0.0NTPLACE6 BUILTBOUNDARY Q6MLOYPi1R LARDf MARS LEAH TAUNUS 1 CR $CRT AND LWOO IGAUD ¢ C W J GATE ❑ 1 - % _ Fl I - I ❑'i LLt w C7 f'I i1 �I Fin Al gip,1 1111%VJLJL7111VQ1.1V11 _i."lJc W U Z W ❑ O a 1�\ i V CE6S L- ^/ REGIO ATED CREENFIELDARE. 0. �OIOR.L CORRIDOR PGGONAL CGMRf BOWMANVILLE TR,RSR ST.TRH � W.TBIF0.0NTPLACE6 BUILTBOUNDARY Q6MLOYPi1R LARDf Intensification 524 units Greenfield 3,056 units Total units 3, 53o io WWI' 1 'Ij \ �.��... At BUILT4JP AREA DESIGNATED GREENFIELD AREA NEWCASTLE VILLAGE WATERFRONT PLACES BUILT BOUNDARY no 171 ac- Sri c Grz)'�A�,tnc O (C: t �,B 5 a7 ri do I P h n, s T n Ioeveloprnent of Greenfoeld Areas that are greater than approx�rnately 20 hectares shall on0y proceed on accordance with an approved Secondary Plan. Clarington will also have to develop more detailed phasing poNcoes -o guide the Secondary Gllanning process o�c0��lo�e o the consideration of the amount of avOab e hand F infrastructure and public facilities costs fiscal capacity of the municipality Accommodating intensofr catoon v \ ;H be a challenge for Clarington Municipality will need to more than double its intensification rate to meet the Region's targets o community acceptance and support for compact development Large portion of the committed Greenfield (draft approved and proposed) development does not have sufficient services Overall.... Clarington has sufficient land to accommodate the Regional Official Plan population forecasts and intensification targets for the Community. Adoption of sustainable land development principles and building practices is vital to reducing the potential environmental pressures of growth. There will be a need for strong urban design polices to ensure community character is protected and enhanced.