Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-290-89T _,�, ­'111" -,,. TOWN OF NEWCASTLE TOWNH . GPA REPORT F i l e Res. # By -Law # PUBLIC MEETING MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee DATE: Monday, November 20, 1989 T #: PD- 290 -89 FILE #: DEV 89 -55 SUB.ECT: PUBLIC MEETING FOR REZONING FOR A PROPOSED FOUR (4) UNIT TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT AT 36 CHURCH STREET, VILLAGE OF NEWCASTLE. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PD- 290 -89 be received; and 2. THAT application to amend the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By -law 84 -63, as amended, submitted by Edmond Vanhaverbeke be referred back to Staff for further processing and the preparation of a subsequent report upon receipt of all outstanding comments; and 3. THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. 1. APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: Edmond Vanhaverbeke 1.2 Rezoning: From "Urban Residential Type Two (R2)" To: an appropriate zone to permit the development of four (4) street Townhouses. 1.3 Area: 631.6 m2 (6798.7 sq. ft.) ...2 REPORT PD- 290-89 PAGE 2 2.1 On July 3, 1989, Mr. Edmond Vanhaverbeke submitted a rezoning application to permit four (4) Street Townhouses to the Town of Newcastle Planning Department. 3. LOCATION 3.1 The subject site is located in Part Lot 28, Concession 1, former Township of Clarke, Part Lot 3, Block 1 of the Hanning Plan, 36 Church Street in the Village of Newcastle. 4. EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES 4.1 Existing Uses: Vacant - the house that was previously located on the lot was destroyed by fire in 1989. 4.2 Surrounding Uses: East: Vacant lot and residential West: residential South: residential North: 280 m2 Commercial and four (4) apartment units (DEV 87 -72). 5. OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 5.1 The subject site appears to be located in the area designated as "Main Central Area" within the Durham Regional Official Plan. This designation encourages the development of shopping, office, community, personal and business service as well as residential uses. 5.2 The property in question is within the "Medium Density Residential" Predominant Use Area in the "Main Central Area" of Newcastle Village. Section 8.2.5.2 i) e) iv) of the Town of Newcastle Official Plan states that: ...3 REPORT .D_ 290-89 PAGE 3 "The Medium Density Residential Designation provides for higher density development within the Main Central Area adjacent to the main concentration of retail and personal service use." In this respect, it appears that the proposed development complies to the Town of Newcastle Official Plan. 6. PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS 6.1 Pursuant to Council's resolution of July 26, 1982 and the requirements of the Planning Act, the appropriate signage acknowledging the application was installed on the subject lands. In addition, the appropriate notice was mailed to each landowner within the prescribed distance. As of the writing of this report, no written submissions have been received. However there have been a limited number of verbal enquiries expressing concerns about this development. Such concerns include: the number of units proposed on this small lot; and the lack of conformity of this proposal with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. 7. COMMENTS FROM AGENCIES 7.1 In accordance with departmental procedures, the application was circulated to obtain comments from other departments and agencies. The following departments /agencies in providing comments, offered no objection to the application as filed: - Town of Newcastle Fire Department - Newcastle Hydro Electric Commission - Durham Regional Health Department 7.2 Staff notes that the Town of Newcastle Community Services Department requested that the park dedication be accepted as cash - in -lieu on the basis of one (1) hectare per 300 dwelling units. ...4 REPORT NO. : PD- 290-89 PAGE 4 7.3 The Town of Newcastle Public Works Department asked that the applicant will bear the costs (100 %) of any works on Church Street which are necessitated as a result of this development and that monetary contributions are made to the reconstructing /upgrading of Church Street (320.00 m x 31.4 m = $10,048.00). In addition, it was requested that a satisfactory lot grading plan be submitted and that a performance guarantee estimates for the following be required: storm sewer extension to existing system; storm sewer connections; and restoration costs on Town property. The Public Works Department also asked that any easements required by the Town be granted free and clear of any encumbrances and that an application for property access be made. 7.4 Durham Regional Planning Department noted that the proposal may be permitted provided that the overall residential density is considered. The Region did note that the existing Regional water supply services are insufficient to accommodate the proposed development. Hence the applicant is responsible for the cost of the watermain extension to service this property. In addition, the applicant will be required to enter into a servicing agreement with the Region. 7.5 At the time of writing this report, comments have yet to be received from the following agencies: Northumberland Newcastle Public School Board and the Peterborough- Victoria - Northumberland and Newcastle Roman Catholic Separate School Board. 8. STAFF COMMENTS 8.1 Staff completed an extensive examination of the number of residential units located in the "Main Central Area" and compared this to the designated population as depicted on Schedule 8 -1 of the Town of Newcastle Official Plan. From these calculations, it appeared that the "Main Central Area" can support an additional 26 units. Thus provided that there is sufficient servicing available 5 r ri • • PAGE 5 REPORT PD- on the site for these four units, Staff will be willing to support this application based on the provisions of the Official Plan which provides for higher density development in the Main Central Area (Section 8.2.5.2 i) e) iv)). 9. CONCLUSION 9.1 As the purpose of this report is to address the requirements of a Public Meeting under the Planning Act and in consideration of the comments outstanding, Staff recommends the application be referred back to Staff for further processing. Respectfully submitted, Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P. Director of Planning and Development HM *FW *cc *Attach 8 November 1989 Recommended for presentation to the Committee Lawrenc . Kotseff Chief A nistrative Officer Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: Edmond Vanhaverbeke 214 King St. E., Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 1P3 t ,m pluLki i R1 -3 0hANAVjl, rwq 0