Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-281-89TOWN OF NEWCASTLE SING: General Purpose and Administration Committee DATE: November 6, 1989 ,4Y4 PD- 8 . 281-7 FILE iL- /,7 e, File # Res. # By -Lava # SUBJECT: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION - FILE: OPA 89 -47/N REZONING /SITE PLAN APPLICATION - FILE: DEV 89 -57 PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM - FILE: 18CDM -89 -015 APPLICANT: J. SCHWARTZ TEMPERANCE AND WELLINGTON STREETS, BOWMANVILLE RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PD- 281 -89 be received; 2. THAT the Town of Newcastle recommend to the Region of Durham that the application to amend the Town of Newcastle Official Plan (Bowmanville Major Urban Area) submitted by J. Schwartz on behalf of Specialty Paper Products Limited to permit the development of a twenty -one (21) unit residential building with 2323 square metres (25,000 sq.ft.) of commercial floor space be APPROVED; 3. THAT the proposed Zoning By -law Amendment to the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By -law 84 -63, as amended, be APPROVED; 4. THAT the amending by -law be passed at such time that the Official Plan Amendment has been approved by the Region of Durham and the applicant has entered into a Site Plan Agreement with the Town; 5. THAT a copy of this Report and Council's decision be forwarded to the Region of Durham Planning Department; and 6. THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. ...2 1. APPLICATION DETAILS: 1.1 Applicant: J. Schwartz on behalf of Specialty Paper Products Limited 1.2 O.P.A.: from "Community Facility" to "Commercial" 1.3 Rezoning: from "Urban Residential Type One Exception (R1 -12)" to an appropriate category to permit a twenty -one (21) unit residential building of condominium tenure with 2323 sq.m. (25,000 sq.ft.) of commercial floor space. 1.4 Area: 0.53 ha (1.30 acres) 2. BACKGROUND: 2.1 In May, 1989, the Town of Newcastle Planning and Development Department received an application to amend the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By -law 84 -63, as well as for Site Plan approval. The commercial component would comprise the first two floors, and the residential units on the third and fourth floors. The applicant has also submitted an Official plan Amendment application, the purpose of which is to allow the development of the four (4) storey mixed use commercial- residential building. Should the principle of the residential /commerical use be approved, the applicant will be required to enter into a Site Plan Agreement. 2.2 The applicant has additionally submitted an application for condominium approval. Staff would note that a subsequent report on the condominium application would be prepared at such time as the initial applications have been duly processed. 3. LOCATION: 3.1 The subject site is an irregular shaped parcel, approximately 0.53 ha (1.30 acres) in size, located on the southeast corner of Temperance Street and Wellington Street. ...3 F -7 A J/ 11 4. EXISTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: 4.1 Existing Use: Industrial - Specialty Paper Products Ltd. 4.2 Surrounding Land Uses Include: North: residential on north side of Wellington Street South: residential, church, firehall and parking lot East: residential - multiple unit, rental West: residential and library on west side of Temperance Street 5. OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES: 5.1 Within the Durham Regional Official Plan the subject area is designated "Main Central Area ". These areas shall provide a full integrated array of shopping, personal and business services, office, institutional, community, recreational and residential uses. Residential uses are permitted in the Main Central Area in conjunction with commercial development up to the allowable floor space index of 2.50. The proposal has an index of approximately .350 therefore, appears to be in compliance. Notwithstanding the above, the maximum floor space index is not binding on Council, which must also be satisfied that the proposed density is in harmony with the existing and future development in the Bowmanville Central Area. 5.2 The lands are located within the designated "Main Central Area" in the town of Newcastle Official Plan and are further designated in Schedule 8.2 as "Community Facilities ". The predominant use of lands for those areas designated "Community Facilities" shall be social, educational, governmental and recreation activities, hence, the requirement of an Official Plan Amendment. ...4 1- 7 � * � 1i l 6. COMMENTS AND CIRCULATED AGENCIES: 6.1 The initial application, the Official Plan Amendment, was circulated by Staff at the Region to various agencies and departments for comments. 6.2 Town Staff undertook a joint circulation of the Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning /Site Plan applications. The condominium application; being received at a later date was circulated as an addendum to the preceeding applications. 6.3 The Peterborough- Victoria - Northumberland and Newcastle Roman Catholic Separate School Board, Ministry of Natural Resources, and Newcastle Electric Hydro Commission noted no objections to the proposal. Newcastle Fire Department offered no objections, noting that the proposed development must conform to the applicable sections of the Ontario Building Code and Ontario Fire Code for mixed Group C and Group E occupancy. Demolition of the existing building will be required to comply with Subsection 1.1.3 of the Ontario Building Code. It is noted that a demolition permit of the existing building has been issued to the applicant. 6.4 Newcastle Community Services Department offered no objection to the proposal, however, noted that approximately seventy - seven (77) persons generated from such a proposal would be located within the central core which has an inadequate provision of parkland for the existing population. Pursuant to Town standards /policies, Community Services Staff would request that the land dedication requirements for both the residential and commercial development as contained in the Planning Act and Town's Official Plan be accepted as cash -in- ...5 V5 !•• U PAGE 5 lieu and the funds realized be credited to the Parks Reserve Account. 6.5 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority had no objections to the proposed use. It was confirmed that a more thorough review would take place at the site plan process. Nevertheless, the site is subject to Ontario Regulation 161/80; and consequently permits must be obtained prior to any filling or grading on the lands. 6.6 The Bowmanville Central Business Improvement Area endorsed a resolution at the May 9, 1989 meeting which stated that they wished to go on record as having no objection to the proposal to amend the Official Plan to permit the proposed development. The B.I.A. reconfirmed that they have always taken the position of supporting the Official Plan which provides for the location of some 500,000 sq. ft. of commercial and personal service space in the Bowmanville Central District. 6.7 The town of Newcastle Public Works Department Staff offered no objections to the principle of development but requested that the applicant prepare a conceptual site servicing report to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. This requirement has been met and the applicant is required to ensure that any and all works are completed in accordance with the Town of Newcastle's Design Criteria and Standard Drawings. 6.8 Additional Town Public Works Department requirements included the following items: any easements required are to be granted free and clear of all encumbrances. ...6 �. .� the applicant /owner will bear the costs of any works on Wellington and Temperance Street which are necessitated as a result of the development (i.e.: intersection improvements, turning lanes, utility relocation, sodding, entrance construction, sidewalk construction) the applicant /owner contributes to the cost of reconstructing Wellington and Temperance Street in accordance with Town Policy. Staff would note that the majority of the above items will be addressed at the site plan agreement stage, should the principle of development and the Official Plan Amendment be approved. 6.9 The Regional Works Department has no objections to the proposal. They have requested that any approval be made subject to the applicant and the Region entering into an Agreement to ensure that their requirements are satisfied. The exact servicing requirements would be examined during the process of site servicing approval. 6.10 Regional Planning Staff has requested that an amending by -law not be passed until the related Official Plan has been dealt with by both Town and Regional Councils. 7. PUBLIC MEETING AND RESPONSE: 7.1 Pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, a Public Meeting was scheduled and held on July 17, 1989. 7.2 A total of eight (8) individuals voice their concerns and opposition to the proposal. A petition with approximately two hundred (200) names was circulated by one of the speakers. ...7 7R � a 7.3 In summary, the concerns as expressed included the following: - development would adversely impact traffic - a more desirable alternative being a park for senior citizens - premature and should receive input from residents - prefer residential rather than commercial - development not compatible with surrounding homes - concerns of garbage, traffic and noise - loss of a historical building - should be rehabilitated and incorporated into new project - parking facilities inadequate - oppose commercial aspect as Wellington Street is residential - convince stores and fast food outlets will create an intrusion on surrounding residences causing parking and traffic hazard 7.4 Subsequent to the Public Meeting, a request was made of Committee that a further meeting be held between the developer and the residents. As a result, an "Open House - Residents Meeting" was held on September 20, 1989. This session was to provide the residents a further opportunity to review the proposal with the developer and Town Staff. A total of two hundred and ten (210) notices were mailed advertising the second meeting date. Approximately thirty (30) residents attended. The predominant concerns put forth substantiated those expressed to Committee (i.e. questionable need for commercial development, traffic, noise, garbage and parking). 7.5 In addition to the two ( 2 ) scheduled meetings, a number of written submissions in opposition to the proposal were also received by the Department. 7.6 The Town of Newcastle L.A.C.A.C. indicated that while they had no objection to the proposed zoning change, they did strongly object to the approval of any plan which would ultimately lead ...8 F-7n J / I to the demolition of the building. The Committee further urged Council to ask the developer to present a plan which would involve the restoration of this building. 7.7 Mr. Irwin Hamilton, Solicitor, on behalf of Mr. M. Preston, the owner of the property immediately to the south indicated that although he is in general support of the application and design of the building, he has concerns as to the amount of commercial space. It was suggested that the entire second floor of the project be made residential and the portion of the ground floor fronting on to Wellington Street be made residential. Furthermore, the design of the building be such that the entrance to the commercial area be obtained only through the parking area and not from Temperance Street. 7.8 The Town of Newcastle Library Board opposes the application inasmuch as it has the effect of decreasing the amount of lands designated "Community Facility ". The Board further notes that until a new central Library facility site is identified by the Board and Town Council, their opposition must remain. In addition, concern was expressed as to the lack of parking and compatibility of certain commercial uses. 7.9 A letter of opposition was submitted by Mr. Robert Kent and Mr. Karl Kent listing concerns of garbage, policing, noise and compatibility of commercial and residential uses. 8. STAFF COMMENTS: 8.1 As noted earlier in the report, the application for Official Plan Amendment involves the request for a redesignation to permit a combined residential /commercial building. In both Official Plans, the subject site is within the "Main Central ...9 �runrrlI U�1 Area" designation. Both Plans note that there should be a full integrated array of commercial, institutional, community and residential uses within the Main Central Area. Residential uses are permitted in the Main Central Area in conjunction with commercial development up to an allowable floor space index of 2.50. The proposal is well below this figure. 8.2 In consideration of the general scope of the comments submitted, Staff requested that a traffic and parking study be submitted by the applicant as supporting documentation. Staff have reviewed the study and have generally no objections to the report and conclusions drawn from same. It is Staff's opinion that the traffic congestion concerns and parking needs have been adequately addressed in the Study. 8.3 A conclusion within the report noted that in consideration of the number of community facilities (Library, Town Hall, Community Services, Post Office and Court House) within a two (2) block walking distance, it is expected that the development would generate a large percentage of walk -in traffic in which people have cars parked in other locations. As well, the commercial facilities would be used by the condominium owners who will not require additional parking spaces. Under these conditions, the number of parking spaces provided should be adequate for most periods. For peak periods, alternative parking is available either in Town parking lots or designated on street parking areas. Staff would note that the site plan has been designed to permit pedestrian access via a walkway/ stairway abutting the town parking facilities to the southeast. ...10 REPORT •. PD- 11 8.4 Staff would note for the committee's information, that the applicant originally contemplated the possibility of preserving and rehabilitating the structure. An Engineering Report /Statement severly doubted any realistic possibilities of same in consideration of the age and present condition of the building. It is noted that the structure has suffered the effects of past fire damage. The engineer's response was that the structure could not sustain the alterations necessary for the redevelopment of the site. 8.5 At the initial public meeting, the applicant advised Committee that this prestige development would not be condusive to convenience stores or fast food outlets. Staff would note that, the Town's Comprehensive Zoning By -law was amended (By- law 87 -170) to prohibit the establishment of convenience commercial establishments in the "General Commercial (C1)" zone being within the Main Central Area. Convenient store, therefore, will not be permitted in this proposed development. 8.6 It is Staff's opinion that the approval of a "prestige development" as noted by the applicant, through site plan approval, would adequately address the concerns /comments as submitted to the Town. The various Town Department requirements would be included in the site plan drawing, as well as in the development agreement. 9. CONCLUSIONS: 9.1 In consideration of the comments contained within said report, Staff would have no objections to the approval of the recommendations contained within this Report. c n ) J01/_ r •� ;. Respectfully submitted, Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P. Director of Planning and Development LDT *FW *jip October 26, 1989 Recommended for presentation to the Committee Lawrence Kotseff, M.C.I.P. Chief Administrative Officer 1, INTERESTED PARTIES TO BE NOTIFIED OF COMMITTEE AND COUNCIL'S DECISION: Mr. Jayson Schwartz 2040 Yonge Street 3rd Floor TORONTO, Ontario M4S 1Z9 Ms. Barbar Baker Newcastle Public Library Board 62 Temperance Street BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 3A8 Mr. Harry Cooke 74 Division Street BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 2Z7 Mrs. Phyllis Dewell L.A.C.A.C. Chairperson Box 255 BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 3L1 Hamilton and Associates Barristers & Solicitors P.O. Box 39 1 Division Street BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 3K8 rn ...12 REPORT NO.: PD- 281 -89 PAGE 12 Mr. L.E. Goertzen 94 Wellington Street BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 1V7 Mr. & Mrs. Wilson 6 High Park Blvd. TORONTO, Ontario M6R 1M4 Mr. H. Nind 46 Division Street BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 2Z6 Mr. Lloyd Grovun 86 Wellington Street BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 2Z6 Ms. Evelyn Stroud 89 Little Avenue BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 1J9 Jane Ekells 38 Concession Street West BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 1Y5 Jacques L'Abbe' c/o NRS L'Abbe - Sachs Realty Inc. Madison Centre 4950 Yonge Street Suite 310 NORTH YORK, Ontario M2N 6K1 Mr. Doug Dewell 72 Temperance Street BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 3A9 Carmen Irwin 48 Division Street BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 2Z6 ...13 REPORT NO.: PD ®281 ®89 PAGE 13 R. Walters 45 Division Street BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 3Z5 Karl Kent 28 Lowe Avenue BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 1X5 Robert Kent 30 Lowe Avenue BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L1C 1X5 X85 PROPOSED AMENDMENT OFFICIAL PLAN BOWMANVILLE MAJOR URBAN AREA PURPOSE: The Purpose of this Amendment is to permit the development of a twenty -one (21) unit residential building with 2323 square metres of commercial floor space on the southeast corner of Wellington and Temperance Street, in Part of Lot 12, Concession 1, Bowmanville. BASIS: The amendment is to facilitate the development of a mixed residential and commercial building within the Main Central Area of Bowmanville as a result of a development application. ACTUAL AMENDMENT: The Town of Newcastle Official Plan ( Bowmanville Major Urban Area) is hereby amended as follows: 1. Schedule 7 -2 is amended by changing the "Community Facility" designation to "Commercial" designation of the property as identified in Schedule "B" attached hereto. IMPLEMENTATION: The provisions set forth in the Town of Newcastle Official Plan ( Bowmanville Major Urban Area) with respect to implementation, shall apply to this Amendment. INTERPRETATION: The provisions set forth in the Town of Newcastle Official Plan ( Bowmanville Major Urban Area), as amended, regarding the implementation of the Plan shall apply in regard to this Amendment. 1■ ■ ■. ■ ■ ■ ■.l ........... 589 R z G) 0 z rr rr Dev. 89-57, O.P.A. 89 -47/N �qn ki