HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-240-89 AddendumTOWN OF NEWCASTLE
.�.
MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
E
MUM.
October 23, 1989
ADDENDUM TO
PD- 240 -89 FILE #:
DEV 89 -05 (X /REF:
18T- 86069)
REZONING APPLICATION - TUNNEY PLANNING
PART LOT 12, CONCESSION 2, TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE
OUR FILE: DEV 89 -05 (g /REF.: 18T- 86069)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1• THAT Report PD- 240 -89 be received;
2. THAT Report PD- 240 -89 be lifted from the table; and
3• THAT the recommendations contained in PD- 240 -89 be APPROVED.
1• BACKGROUND:
1.1 At the meeting of October 2, 1989, Staff prepared a report PD-
240-89, recommending approval of Subdivision application 18T-
86069 and Rezoning Application DEV 89 -05. The applications
Proposed a total of seventy -one (71) units, forty -six (46) of
which are semi - detached /link units.
1.2 Two (2) residents appeared before Committee noting concerns
with the application. These related to the number of units
...2
J
now proposed; seventy -one (71), as opposed to fifty -two (52)
as originally submitted, and the ability to connect to
services should the development adversely effect the existing
septic system.
1.3 Committee decided to table the application to the next General
Purpose and Administration Committee meeting to allow the
applicant to meet with Staff and the concerned residents to
resolve the issues. The meeting requested by Committee was
held immediately following the Committee meeting. Mr. Macklin
agreed that Linmac Inc. would hook up the Lutenburg residence
to the sewer system at the same time as the servicing of the
Linmac property and a reasonable cost would be arranged. The
design revisions of the application were further discussed in
terms of the surrounding development proposals and the
rationale for introducing semi - detached /link units as
transition from the singles.
1.4 This discussion and explanation appeared to satisfy both Mr.
Lugtenburg and Mr. Sturrock thereby alleviating what concerns
they had. Both residents later provided letters (see
attached) withdrawing any objection previously made.
1.5 In light of these proceedings, Staff would recommend that PD-
240 -89, be considered as submitted.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
� � I
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P. Lawrence
Director of Planning Chief Ad
and Development Officer
CP *FW *jip
October 10, 1989
r,nl)
J U I L
Kotseff
istrative
...3
ADDENDUM TO REPORT NO.: PD- 240 -89 PAGE 3
INTERESTED PARTIES TO BE NOTIFIED OF COMMITTEE AND COUNCIL'S
DECISION:
Tunney Planning
Suite 200
340 Byron Street South
WHITBY, Ontario
L1N 4P8
Mr. Gordon Sturrock
210 Scugog Street
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario
L1C 3J8
Mr. Peter Lugtenburg
191 Scugog Street
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario
L1C 3J9
€� n,
I
j