HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-236-89DN: SCH /BR
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
REPORT File #ra�.�
Res. #
By -Law #
STING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: Monday, October 2, 1989
REPORT #: RD- 226 -29 FILE #: DEV 89 -801, OPA 89- 57 /D /N
SUBJECT: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATIONS
SCHICKEDANZ BROS. LTD.
PART LOT 7, CONCESSION 1, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
FILE: DEV 89 -801, OPA 89- 57 /D /N
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD- 236 -89 be received;
2. THAT Official Plan Amendment Application 89- 57 /D /N and Rezoning Application
DEV 89 -801 be DENIED as premature;
3. THAT the Region of Durham and the applicant be so advised and forwarded a
copy of the Report PD- 236 -89; and
4. THAT the delegations and interested parties be informed of Council's
decision.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 Two applications have been submitted by Schickedanz Bros. Ltd. with
respect to a 46.06 hectare parcel in Part Lot 7, Concession 1, former
Township of Darlington The applications are as follows:
...2
r-- 4
� I Wt
REPORT NO.: PD-236-89 PAGE 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) An Official Plan Amendment application which seeks to amend the
Durham Region and the Town of Newcastle official Plan to extend the
Bowmanville major Urban Area to incorporate these lands and permit
the development of a residential subdivision containing 216 single
family dwellings, 310 semi-detached dwellings and a commercial
block;
(ii) A rezoning application which seeks an appropriate zoning to
implement the Official Plan.
1.2 The subject site is located on the north side of Highway No. 2 and on
the west side of Lamb's Road. Surrounding land uses include as follows:
i) north - former correctional institute;
ii) south - rural residential and vacant lands south of Highway No. 2;
iii) east - rural - agricultural;
iv) west - proposed residential development, Bowmanville Zoo and Soper
Creek Valley.
2. OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS
2.1 The subject lands are currently designated in the Durham Region Official
Plan as 'Permanent Agricultural Reserve', and 'Major open Space' with
'Hazard Lands' and 'Environmentally Sensitive' characteristics. The
Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 places an
"Agricultural (A)", "Agricultural Exception (A-1)" and "Environmental
Protection (EP)11 zoning on this site. Both planning documents state
that the predominant use of lands under this designation and zoning
shall be for agricultural and farm related uses. The portion of the
lands shown on the Official Plan as 'Hazard Lands' and zoned
'Environmental Protection (EP)' correspond to Soper Creek and its
Tributary.
2.2 The subject lands are not currently within the Bowmanville Urban Area
and consequently not covered by the land use designations and policies
of the Town of Newcastle Official Plan. Nevertheless, should the
proposed official Plan Amendment be approved and the subject lands
incorporated into the Urban Area, the policies in the Town's Official
Plan would apply.
..3
REPORT NO.: PD-236-89
2.3 The application proposes a 1.52 ha commercial block which could support
between 4500 and 5500 sq. m of retail and personal service floorspace.
This commercial use would be considered in the context of a Local
Central Area. The Town's Official Plan (Section 7.2.5.2. ii (g)) states
that applications for an amendment to designate additional Local Central
Areas, regardless of scale, shall be accompanied by a retail analysis to
justify the need for and to identify the effects of such proposed Local
Central Area upon the viability of any existing Central Areas designated
on the Bowmanville Land Use Schedule.
A retail analysis has not been submitted with the application.
3. PUBLIC NOTICE
3.1 In accordance with Town's procedures and the requirements of the Planning
Act, the appropriate signage acknowledging the application was installed
on the subject lands and written notice was circulated to property owners
within 120 metres of the subject site.
4. PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS
4.1 A letter of concern was received from Mr. and Mrs. Mery Marshall. The
Marshalls object to this proposal, in that they believe that the
designated future development area north of Bowmanville should be
considered before the subject site to the east of Bowmanville is
considered.
4.2 Two letters were received from residents who object to the development
of the rural area and are concerned with the ability to provide
educational and recreational services to this area.
5. CIRCULATION
5.1 The subject applications were circulated to various agencies and
departments to obtain comments. The following agencies/departments
offered no objection to the proposal:
- Ministry of Transportation -915
- Newcastle Hydro
5.2 The Community Services Department has commented that the park (1.62 ha)
suggested by the applicant is physically too small to provide a full
range of park activities. The Community Services Department further
suggests that the applications be deferred pending an Official Plan
Review to expand the urban area of Bowmanville. Through a Plan Review
park and school requirements can be addressed more thoughtfully.
5.3 The Fire Department note that this site, combined with all other
proposed growth in Bowmanville, will put a strain on all services
available to residents. Furthermore since Highway No. 2 is two lanes in
this area, response times may be affected by the volume of traffic, which
will be realized with the growth in this area.
5.4 The Ministry of Agriculture have responded that they can not provide
favourable comments until such time as the need of this land for
purposes other than agriculture be justified and documented as per
section 3.14 of the Food Land Guidelines.
5.5 The Ministry of Natural Resources have no objections to the principle of
the amendment but support the retention of the 'open Space' designation
as it creates a buffer between the developable lands and the water
course. The ministry have also suggested conditions of draft approval of
the subdivision, once the application is submitted.
5.6 Comments have not been received from the Ministry of the Environment,
Ontario Hydro, Durham Region Public Works, the Public School Board and
the Separate School Board.
6. COMMENTS
6.1 The applicant is seeking to expand the urban area boundary of
Bowmanville to provide additional residential lands and some
neighbourhood commercial services. The two fundamental questions to be
addressed are:
...5
516
REPORT W0.: PD-236-89
PAGE 5
_ the need to designate additional lands for residential development at
the present time;
- the most appropriate direction for the BovmmuviIIe Urban Area to
expand at such time as additional lam] is required. Agricultural
capability, environmental sensitivity, urban structure, transportation
routes, proximity to community facilities, and ease of servicing are
among the factors considered in this review.
0.2 With respect tothe need to designate additional lands for residential
development, the applicant has not submitted the justification report as
required under the Foodland Guidelines of the Ministry of Agriculture.
Nevertheless, Staff have examined the questioned of need through two
different methodologies.
i) Population Projections
At the presnet time, the population for the Bowmanville Urban Area is
approximately 14 700 geronoa. At maturity within the presently
defined limits for the Bovmauville Urban Area, the planned population
is 42 500 persons. Bowmmuville would contain approximately 45% of
the total Town of Newcastle population at maturity under the current
official Plan.
The Regional population focoast (prepared in 1987) projects a
Newcastle population of 64 350 in 2011. Given this and assuming an
even distribution of population growth aozoaa the Town, Bowmauville'a
population would be approximately 30 000 persons in year 2011.
Consequently, on the basis of the most recent population forecast
available, it would appear that BovmauviIIe would not require
additional residential lands within the next twenty years.
7
J|
�i/
REPORT NO.: PAGE 6
At the present time, approximately 7 000 new residential units are
approved or are subject of active plans of subdivision or site plan
applications. In addition, there is vacant residential that could
accommodate a further 1500 new residential units. This yields a
potential supply of 8 500 units excluding redevelopment
opportunities.
Over the last four years during the record housing construction
boom, the average rate of construction in Bowmanville has been 235
units annually. Assuming that future housing construction could
proceed at double the present rate (an average annual demand of 500
units), there would still be a 17 year supply of residential land
within the existing urban area as defined in the Official Plan.
6.3 The Provincial Policy Statement on Land Use Planning for Housing requires
that Official Plans designate enough land for to provide a 10 year supply
of residential land. Staff's review of the need for additional
residential land using two different methodologies indicates that the
Bowmanville Urban Area can meet the residential land requirements for
much more than 10 years. As a consequence, staff do not consider the
subject application necessary nor desireable. In this regard, the
designation of the subject lands would disrupt the orderly planning of
the presently designated residential areas by potentially "drawing off"
residential growth that would otherwise fill out the existing planned
neighbourhoods. This would tend to spread growth rather than allowing
for the efficient staging of growth. It could make it more difficult to
efficiently provide municipal services such as parks, schools and
potentially transit. Moreover, the overdesignation of lands for urban
purposes would prematurely take land out of active agricultural
production.
6.4 With respect to the most appropriate direction for the growth of the
Bowmanville Urban Area, this question is clearly premature until such
time as the need is established.
�A
REPORT NO.: PAGE 7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Z I Z t;8 k, romroji, 1.9
7.1 The Bowmanville Urban Area can accommodate residential growth well beyond
the 10 planning timeframe, possibly enough for even the next 20 years.
As a consequence, it is recommended that official Plan Amendment
application 89-57/D/N, and Rezoning application DEV 89-80 submitted by
Schickedanz Bros. Ltd., be DENIED AS PREMATURE.
Respectfully submitted,
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P.
Director of Planning & Development
JDB*DC*FW*cc
*Attach.
September 14, 1989
Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
- ----- - -----------------
wrence Kotseff
Chief A m' istrative Officer
Interested persons to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Templeton-Lepek Ltd. Mr. Matt Yeatman
Suite 232, 5050 Dufferin St. 19 Barley Mill Road
DoWnSView, Ontario Bowmanville, Ont.
M3H 5T5 LlC 4E6
Schickedanz Bros. Ltd. Ms. Marianne Brown
3311 Bayview Ave., Suite 105 19 Barley Mill
Willowdale, Ontario Bowmanville, Ont.
M2K 1G4 LlC 4E6
Mr. & Mrs. M. Marshall
852 Masson Street
OSHAWA, Ontario
LlG 5A
1 ,. s �.
..
• OPA 811