HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-156-89DN: STOLP
1
ME fING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: Monday, July 3, 1989
RBUT #; PD- 156 -89
FILE #: DEV 89 -41, 18T 89037 & 89- 32 /D /N
WBJECT: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION - FILE: 89- 32 /D /N
REZONING APPLIATION - FILE: DEV 89 -41
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION: FILE: 18T 89037
APPLICANT: STOLP HOMES (NEWCASTLE) DEVELOPERS INC.
PART LOT 35, CONCESSION 1, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD- 156 -89 be received;
2. THAT Official Plan Amendment Application 89- 32 /D /N, Rezoning Application DEV
89 -41 and Subdivision Application 18T 89037 submitted by Stolp Homes
(Newcastle) Developers Inc., be referred back to Staff for further
processing and the preparation of a subsequent report upon receipt of all
outstanding comments; and
3. THAT a copy of Council's decision be forwarded to the interested parties
indicated hereto.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 Three applications have been submitted by Stolp Homes (Newcastle)
Developers Inc. for a 30.5 ha parcel in Part Lot 35, Concession 1,
former Township of Darlington. These applications are as follows:
...2
- i�n1
JU!
REPORT 0O.: PD:I56-89
PAGE 2
(i) The Official Plan Amendment application seeks to exneud the Durham Region
and the Tcnou of Newcastle Official Plans to include the subject lands in
the Courtice Urban Area.
(ii) The Subdivision Application proposes the creation of 282 single fsuniIv
homes, 56 semi-detached homes, 2 medium density tVvmzbouae blocks with a
total of 154 townhouse units, and a 5.8 bo park block associated with a
tributary of Robinson Creek.
(iii) The rezoning application seeks an appropriate zoning on the subject
lands to implement the proposed subdivision.
1.2 The subject site is located on the south side of Regional BOad 0o. 22
(Bloor Street) immediately east of TownIiue Road. Surrounding land uses
include a proposed plan of subdivision to the north within the Coortioe
Urban Area, vacant agricultural lands to the south and east and existing
residential development to the west in the City of Oshawa.
1.3 The northern 8.3 bu of the lands were previously subject of Official Plan
Amendment AppIication87-l2/D/N submitted by Gatehouse Holdings which
proposed the creation of single family lots and a medium density
townhouse block. J\ number of area residents submitted a petition in
objection to the proposed medium density block. 8toIo Booxea subsequently
acquired the property and withdrew the application.
2. PUBLIC NOTICE AND GOIMIGGIO0G
3.1 In accordance with Council's procedures and the requirements of the
Planning Act, the appropriate signage acknowledging the application was
installed on the subject Iooda. In addition, the appropriate notice was
mailed to each landowner within 120 metres of the site.
REPORT NO.: P0- 156 °89
The Official Plan Amendment application seeks to amend the Durham Region
and the Town of Newcastle Official Plans to include the subject lands in
the Courtice Urban Area.
(ii) The Subdivision Application proposes the creation of 282 single family
homes\�56 semi - detached homes, 2 medium density townhouse blocks with a
total of\154 townhouse units, and a 5.8 ha park block associated with a
tributary \of Robinson Creek.
(iii) The rezoning application seeks an appropriate zoning on the subject
lands to impleme\i\lt the proposed subdivision.
1.2 The subject site is' located on the south side of Regional ROad No. 22
(Bloor Street) immediately east of Townline Road. Surrounding land uses
include a proposed plan`,of subdivision to the north within the Courtice
Urban Area, vacant agricultural lands to the south and east and existing
residential development to the west in the City of Oshawa.
1.3 The northern 8.3 ha of the lands. were previously subject of Official Plan
Amendment Application 87- 12 /D /N submitted by Gatehouse Holdings which
proposed the creation of single family lots and a medium density
townhouse block. A number of area residents submitted a petition in
objection to the proposed medium density, \block. Stolp Homes submitted a
petition in objection to the proposed medium density block. Stolp Homes
subsequently acquired the property and withdrew the application.
2. PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS
2.1 In accordance with Council's procedures and the requirements of the
Planning Act, the appropriate signage acknowledging the application was
installed on the subject lands. In addition, the appropriate notice was
mailed to each landowner within 120 metres of the site.
..3
t np
JUL
REPORT NO.: pD-156-89 PAGE 3
______________________________________________________________________________
3.1 The subject lands are currently designated 'General Agriculture' by the
Durham Regional official Plan with 'Hazard Lands' associated with the
tributary of Robinson Creek.
3~2 The subject lands are not currently within the CouzticeUrban Area and
consequently not covered by the land use designations and policies of
the Town of Newcastle Official Plan. Nevertheless, obooId the proposed
official Plan Amendment be approved and the subject lands incorporated
into the Urban Area, the policies in the Town's official Plan »moId
apply.
The Town's official Plan (Section 6.1.2 iv)a) states that low density
residential development in the Cooctioe Urban Area shall not exceed o
density of 15 units Dec net residential hectare. The subject
subdivision application proposes a density of 21.9 units per net
residential hectare in the single family and semi-detached portion of
the proposed development.
The Town's Offioal Plan (Section 6.1.2 iv)b) further specifies that
medium density development shall not exceed n density of 40 units per
net residential hectare, and shall be generally located at the periphery
of the residential neighbourhood with direct aooeao to collector or
arterial roads. The proposed townhouse blocks conform to the Official
Plan's requirements in respect of density and location.
The Town's official Plan (Section 6.1.2 iii)a) further requires
Neighbourhood Development Plans tobe prepared and approved byCouncil
prior to the oppzuvuI of plans of subdivision. In this regard, should
the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved, the overall
development pattern for the subject lands and other lands in the area
would need to be determined in the context of a neighbourhood
Development Plan prior to approval of the subdivision application.
3.3 The lands are currently zoned 'Agricultural (&) by By-law 84-63, with
'Environmental Protection (EP) lands associated with the Robinson Creek
4
- � 0 � ^^^
JUJ
REPORT NO.: PD- 156 -89 PAGE 4
----------------.-------- _---- .--- _-------- -.- -.- ---- .---- .- ----------- - - - --- - - - -.-
4 AGENCY COMMENTS
4.1 in accordance with departmental procedures, the applications were
circulated to obtain comments from other departments and agencies.
4.2 The Town of Newcastle Fire Department indicated that it would be
difficult for Station No. 4 on Trull's Road to maintain a high level of
service to the subject lands. Response time from the station would be 8
to 10 minutes.
4.3 The Town of Newcastle Community Services Department expressed concern
with the shape and location of the park block in the proposed
subdivision plan.
4.4 The Ministry of Agriculture and Food noted that the proposed development
is located in an agricultural area with high quality soils. Section
3.14 of the Foodland Guideline requires documentation to be submitted
evaluating the need for using an agriucltural area for non- agricultural
purposes. Until such justification has been submitted, the Ministry
cannot support the proposed amendment.
4.5 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority noted that the subject
site is situated within the Robinson Creek watershed. The development
proposal is not within the Courtice Urban Area and as a result the
impacts of the proposal on the Robinson Creek watershed have not been
assessed by the Courtice Storm Water Management Study. A master
drainage study must be conducted to determine the development impacts on
the creek and the manner in which urban storm water management should
be addressed. The Authority is endeavouring to initiate a preliminary
overview study of the watershed, and is reserving comment on the
applications pending completion of the study.
4.6 The Ministry of Natural Resources noted that the three intermittent
tributaries of Robinson Creek which traverse the site which allow for
the production of warm water species of bait trout. The Ministry
recommended that the 'EP' zoning on the lands adjacent to the tributary
be retained.
'50 -4
...5
REPORT N0.: PD-156-89 P&OB 5
_______________________________________________________________________________
4.7 The Northumberland and Newcastle Board of Education, Newcastle Hydro and
Bell Canada indicated no objection to the proposed development.
[onuneuto are outstanding from the following agencies:
- Town of Newcastle Public Works Department
- Region of Durham Works Department
- Ontario Hydro
- Separate School Board
- Ministry of Transportation
- Ministry of the Environment
- C. P. 8oiI
5° COMMENTS
5.1 The principle of developing the subject lands must beestablished through
the Official Plan Amendment Application prior to decisions being made
with respect to the subdivision and rezoning applications. In this
regard, the following issues would need to be evaluated in reviewing the
proposed expansion to the Courtioe Urban Area:
- the need todesignate additional lands for residential development at
the present time;
- the most appropriate direction for the Cnortioe Urban Area to expand
at such time as additional laud is required. Agricultural capability,
environmental sensitivity, ocbmo atcuotuca' transportation routes,
proximity to community facilities, and ease of servicing are among the
factors considered in this review;
- the overall pattern of development for the lands south of Regional
Road 22;
- the findings and recommendations of special studies such as the
Robinson Creek Watershed Study.
5.2 As noted in the comments from the Ministry of Agriculture and Food' a
proposed development on good quality agricultural lands moat be
justified under Section 3,14 of the FoodIaod Guidelines. This
JVJ
documentation must justify the proposed land use in terms of a number of
issues, including projected population growth, land area currently
designated for development and alternative locations for development.
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 It is recommended that Official DImn Amendment Application 89-32/D/0'
Rezoning Application DEV 89-41 and Subdivision Application I8T 89037
submitted by GtoIp Homes be referred back to Staff for further
processing and the preparation of a subsequent report upon completion of
the required studies and receipt of all outstanding comments.
Respectfully submitted,
Franklin WO" yY.C.Z.P.
Director of Planning 6 Development
JAS*DC*FW*oo
*Attach.
June 14, 1989
Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
-----------------
Lawrence Lawceo Kotaeff
Chief &d�i iotcative Officer
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
8toIp Homes Developers Inc.
4950 lyonge Street
Suite 1501
NORTH YORK, Ontario M2N 6K1
Touney Planning
340 Byron Street S.,
Suite 200
WHITBY, Ontario LlN 4P8
Mr. J. 8Iemkn
R. R. # 4
OSHAWA, Ontario LlH 7K6
Ma. Elsie Mayne
B.R.#4
OSHAWA, Ontario LlH 7K6
Mrs. Gillian Jnrnbiuoou
7956 Down Crescent
O3EAWA, Ontario
LlB 7Yl
Mr. George Mc0ob
748 Dnvnz Crescent
OSHAWA, Ontario
LOT 35
BLOOR STREET EAST _
r t i96rr� r.tY 6i�• r �_'"'r��I• n«,�}? •i
-r- � t r� Y y r r •!err •i t 3
r
TOWNHOUSE I
�_�- I t� t Y t r r r ,• I(DEVELOPMENT�
Y io. (2.286 ha)
e -Y• r. s- '..til i I r I ti
6 r r.. r •t r/ ' •• y r r y r n r r r y ii r '. I�
r
'�• I �r i �, • r I{ e t • t 0 t t III I it •} .I
c n
,I t y r • I at
\` y r y Y 1
O r
cn ,• '• '� � I "I z
w
O A ,d
t _ /( I I I W
()
z
z �9, `, I .I
z� I ►I
t t t PARK �I
( 5.812 ha) it
MEDIUM
DENSITY
UJ DEVELOPMENT
3 (1.986ha)
r I ( I ® SUBJECT SITE
35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27
M-SH ROAD
Aj
je�I
t 1 1
►- - -- ` 3 A
U '
I 1
k 1 i i O
2 c�
1 '
O.P.A. 89- 32 /D /N Dev.89 -41
INTERIM CONTROL -
18T -89037 -�`"� 132
KEY MAP ' w