HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-140-89MPQ�41 lain
REPORT
METING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: Monday June 19, 1989
o
REPORT #: PD- 1401 -89 FILE #: DEV 89 -35, 18T 8901301
SUBJECT: APPLICATION TO AMEND BY -LAW 84 -63
APPLICATION FOR PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
KALEE INVESTMENTS LTD. (GRAHAM DALLAS)
PART LOT 19, CONCESSION 8, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
File #6
Res. #
By -Law #
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD- 1401 -89 be received;
2. THAT the application submitted by Graham Dallas on behalf of Kalee
Investments Ltd. for rezoning to implement a residential Plan of Subdivision
be referred back to Staff for a subsequent Staff report pending receipt of
all outstanding comments; and
3. THAT the applicant and applicant's agent be so advised.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 On March 22, 1989 the Planning and Development Department received an
application submitted by W. G. Dallas on behalf of Kalee Investments
Ltd., to amend By -law 84 -63. The By -law amendment would change the
current "Agricultural (A)" zoning on a 12.4 hectare parcel to an
appropriate zone to implement a twenty (201) lot Plan of Subdivision,
located within the Hamlet of Enniskillen.
...2
. 51�
REPORT NO.: PD- 140 -89
PAGE 2
2.1 Members of Committee may recall on February 6, 1989, Staff Report
PD- 146 -89 recommended approval of an application to amend the
Development Plan for the Hamlet of Enniskillen. The amendment allowed
for the expansion of the Hamlet boundaries for Enniskillen to include a
12.4 hectare parcel to permit the development.
2.2 In the Durham Region Official Plan Enniskillen is designated as a Hamlet
for growth and is allowed a maximum of 200 units. In considering the
expansion to the boundaries, Staff reviewed alternate locations and had
resolved that the subject property would be the most appropriate
location for expansion. In addition an Engineering Study also supported
the area chosen for expansion noting that soils were suitable for
individual waste disposal systems.
2.3 The proposal was approved as a modification to the Enniskillen Secondary
Hamlet Plan, noting that Section 9 (Hamlets) of the Town of Newcastle
Official Plan had been approved by Regional Council, as of January 11,
1989. Section 9, however, has not yet been approved by the Ministry.
3. LOCATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USE
3.1 The subject lands are located on the west side of Old Scugog Road, 1/2
kilometre north of Regional Road 3, being Part Lot 19, Concession 8,
former Township of Darlington.
3.2 The existing
To the north:
To the west:
To the east:
To the south:
land uses adjacent to the proposed development area
26 ha parcel in agricultural production
12 ha parcel in agricultural production
12.6 ha parcel in agricultural production
Estate Residential Subdivision - phase one Hilltop
Estates.
519
...3
REPORT NO.: PD-140-89
4. PUBLIC NOTICE
PAGE 3
4.1 Pursuant to council's resolution of July 26, 1982 and the requirements
of the Planning Act, the appropriate signage acknowledging the
application was installed on the subject lands. In addition, the
appropriate notice was mailed to each landowner within the prescribed
distance.
4.2 As of writing of this report, no written submissions have been received.
5. AGENCY COMMENTS
5.1 In accordance with departmental procedures the application was
circulated to obtain comments from other departments and agencies. The
following departments/agencies in providing comments offered no
objection to the application as filed:
Ministry of Natural Resources
Ministry of Agriculture and Food
Separate School Board
5.2 The Town of Newcastle Public Works Department offered no objection to
the proposal, provided all concerns are addressed with respect to road
widenings, reconstruction and drainage. All other aspects will be dealt
with through the Subdivision Agreement.
5.3 The Town of Newcastle Fire Department offered no objection, however,
noted a concern with the level of service provided, given the increased
growth in the Town.
5.4 The Town of Newcastle Community Services Department offered no objection
to the proposal, however, requested the applicant pay to the Town of
Newcastle 5% cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication.
...4
520
REPORT N0.: PD-I40-89 PAGE 4
5.5 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority offered no objection to
the principle of the development, however, recommended that the DIau be
revised such that the rear limits of Iota 7 to lI (inclusive) be amended
to coincide with the top-of-bank and be rezoned Environmental Protection
(8D). The Conservation Authority also suggested that the vaIleylanda be
deeded to one of the tableland lots. This would place the entire
valIeylaud block into single ovmzerablp and would minimize impacts on the
slope and valleylaoda.
5.6 The Health Services Department requires further information prior to
providing more detailed comments. The applicant will be required to
submit soil tests, revised site plans indicating location of septic
systems and wells and a final lot grading plan.
5.7 Through the circulation of the Hamlet Plan Amendment the Ministry of
Environment provided comments with respect to the nitrate levels in the
ground water. The Ministry requires that a bydcogeolw]icaI study be
provided to determine the number of lots suitable for development. The
Ministry will require the study prior to approval of the Plan of
Subdivision. The Ministry's comments were not received until after the
Hamlet modification was approved, therefore the results of the
BydcogeologioaI Study will be required prior to draft approval being
granted.
5.8 Comments are utlII outstanding from the following agencies:
- Regional Works
- Public School Board
6. STAFF'COMMENTS
6.1 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority's proposal to place the
valleylaudo under one ovmzecobip appears to result in an odd lot
configuration in the PIou of Subdivision and may reduce the lots size
...5
J�|
REPORT NO.: PD-140-89
PAGE 5
and/or number of lots in the Plan of Subdivision. The applicant has been
asked to discuss the concerns with the Authority.
7. RECOMMENDATION
7.1 As the purpose of this report is to address the requirement of a Public
Meeting pursuant to the requirements in the Planning Act and in
consideration of the outstanding comments, it is recommended that
the application be referred back to Staff for further processing.
Respectfully submitted,
.
�,Fra klin C
r C.I.P.
. Director of Planning & Development
CRV*FW*cc
*Attach.
June 6, 1989
Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
Lawrence E. Kotseff
Chief Administrative Officer
Interested persons to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Graham Dallas Mr. Glen Easton
c/o Kalee Investments Ltd. Proctor and Redfern Ltd.
R.R. # I Consulting Engineers and Architects
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario 45 Green Belt Ave.
LlC 3K2 DON MILLS, Ontario M3C 3K3
522
b
-. � I
r
UY • � � .z # . � � � '�.1' \, •1iVU� • � �..' G':J� ►s �`. '� I ail
sy ®r ^yw �� • . a
��• �►� +'"ice � � ,��' .
r
• • ►• • • •i't •
__