HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-28-95It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD -28 -95 be received;
2. THAT the zoning amendment application and Neighbourhood Plan
amendment application be referred back to staff for further
processing and the preparation of a subsequent report following the
receipt of the outstanding agency comments;
3. THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any
delegation be advised of Council's decision.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 Applicants: Dekkema - Gervais Development Corporation
Sandbury Building (Courtice) Corporation
1.2 Neighbourhood Plan: From "Minor Open Space" to "Residential" in
the Courtice South Neighbourhood Plan in order
to permit the development of two (2) single
family dwelling units.
1.3 Zoning: From "Environmental Protection" to an
appropriate zone in order to implement the
above -noted development.
1.4 Area: .249 hectares (.615 acres)
- 516
RECYCLED ECYCIE
PANS P0.NTMM RECYCLED PAPER
REPORT NO. PD -28 -95 2
BACKGROUND
2.1 The subject property was created as Block 149 through the approval
of Registered Plan of Subdivision 10M -839. Notwithstanding the
Neighbourhood Plan designation and the zoning on the property the
applicant opted to retain ownership of Block 149 for possible
future development.
2.2 In January of 1995, the Planning and Development Department
received an application to amend the Courtice South Neighbourhood
Plan and Comprehensive Zoning By -law 84 -63 in order to permit the
development of two (2) single family dwelling units.
2.3 The proposal is situated on a .249 hectare (.615 acre) parcel of
land located at the south -east bend of Poolton Crescent but is more
formally described as Block 149 on Registered Plan 10M -839.
3. PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS
3.1 Pursuant to Council's resolution of July 26, 1982 and the
requirements of the Planning Act, the appropriate signage
acknowledging the application was installed on the subject lands.
In addition, the appropriate notice was mailed to each landowner
within the prescribed distance.
3.2 As a result of the public notification process, the Planning and
Development Department has received one (1) telephone inquiry and
three (3) written submissions with respect to the proposal. The
telephone inquiry requested more detailed information regarding the
proposal while the three (3) submissions all voiced objections to
the proposal. In addition two (2) of the three (3) submissions
indicate that the residents were under the impression that the
Block would be eventually developed into a playground.
4. OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY
4.1 Within the Durham Regional Official Plan, the subject is designated
as a "Living Area ". The primary use of lands so designated shall
be for residential purposes. In view of the foregoing, the
`0, u p
K
application would appear to comply with the Durham Regional
Official Plan.
4.2 Within the Official Plan of the former Town of Newcastle, the
subject property is located within the 2B Neighbourhood and
designated Residential. Section 6.1.3 (iv) of the Plan encourages
infilling on existing road frontages. Accordingly, the application
appears to conform with the Official Plan for the former Town of
Newcastle.
5. NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN CONFORMITY
5.1 Within the Courtice South Neighbourhood Plan, the subject property
is designated Minor Open Space. Lands so designated are intended
to preserve, wherever possible, unique or important elements of the
natural environment having local significance such as woodlots and
minor watercourses associated with stormwater management. As the
applicant is proposing to develop two (2) single family dwellings
on the property, an amendment to the Courtice South Neighbourhood
Plan is required.
6. ZONING BY -LAW COMPLIANCE
6.1 Within Comprehensive Zoning By -law 84 -63 of the former Town of
Newcastle, the subject property is zoned "Environmental Protection
(EP)". As the applicant is proposing to develop two (2) single
family dwellings on the subject property, an amendment to the
zoning by -law is required.
7. AGENCY COMMENTS
7.1 The application was circulated to various departments and agencies
by the Planning and Development Department. The following provides
a brief summary of the comments received to date.
7.2 The Community Services Department has reviewed the application and
has no objection to the proposal subject to the rear portion of the
lands being deeded to the Municipality being graded and sodded to
the satisfaction of the Municipality.
0
7.3 The Public Works Department has reviewed the application and has no
objection to the proposal subject to the Municipality's standard
conditions regarding service connections, lot grading, access and
street tree planting.
7.4 The only other agency which has responded to the circulation is the
Fire Department which had no objection to the proposal. Comments
remain outstanding from the Regional Planning Department, the
Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority and the Ministry of
Natural Resources.
8. STAFF COMMENTS
8.1 The subject property was created as Block 149 through the approval
of Registered Plan of Subdivision 10M -839. At the time of approval
a stormwater management pond did not exist for the watershed to
accommodate flows from the development. As an interim measure, a
two chamber underground vault was constructed within Block 149, of
which the applicant retained ownership. The underground vault was
intended to accommodate the stormwater flows until such time as the
permanent pond was constructed. The stormwater management pond has
now been finalized and the tributary of Robinson Creek has been
rechannelized. As a result, the applicant contends that Block 149
has sufficient tableland to accommodate two (2) single family
dwelling units. Staff note for the Committee's information that
the subdivision agreement between the Municipality and the
applicant states that Block 149 will be deeded gratuitously to the
Municipality should the applicant be unable to develop Block 149 on
or before the release of the agreement.
8.2 With respect to the issue of the development of Block 149 into a
playground, staff advise for the Committee's and the resident's
information that Block 149 is not intended to the developed as a
playground or parkette. Should the Municipality eventually obtain
0
ownership of Block 149, the Community Services Department has
advised that the Block would be incorporated into the
Municipality's open space system.
8.3 Nevertheless, as the purpose of this report is to provide the
status of the application for the public meeting and consideration
of the outstanding comments, it would be in order to have the
application referred back to Staff for further processing.
Respectfully submitted
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P, RPP
Director of Planning &
Development
00122011sa
Attachment #1 - Key Map
Attachment #2 - Survey
Reviewed by
W.H. Stockwell '
Chief Administrative
Officer
Interested Parties to be notified of Council and Committee's Decision.
Dekkema- Gervais Development Corp.
100 Allstate Parkway
Suite 501
MARKHAM, Ontario
L3R 6H3
Pernell Roberts
33 Poolton Crescent
COURTICE, Ontario
L1E 2H5
Heather Whittall
37 Poolton Crescent
COURTICE, Ontario
L1E 2H5
John Carter
82 DeRose Avenue
BOLTON, Ontario
L7E 1A8
ATTACHMENT +1,
SUBJECT SITE
OTHER LANDS OWNED BY APPLICANT
LOT 32 LOT 31 LOT 30
Fj..
�R I
N
Z
0
(n
W
V
Z
0
V
COURTICE
KEY'MAP
• 100 200 500
50
DEVn 95�00 OL]
1 521
t
C9
f
Z f
LU
-x I --------
— — — — — — — ---
- - - - - - - - - -
iE)LC .3
4P ti
L
g 7 �� loo
BE9CK 149
.4111 ll
L -n
88 7.
89 - I
131 f / % r 1 _ -
101 t I i\ as ;-z
IC8 I
a,
I'l I. Qkkm SE%;ER
!1 ��. ice/ i l�
L—wa
I t
R. INV. '2&365 top
E)LPSA SIONE
PE rAININC WALL--\
Ica. Ex-'INTE�C NG