HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-1-95Subject: PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION & REZONING APPLICATION
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD -1 -95 be received;
2. THAT the proposed revised Plan of Subdivision 18T -87057 dated
December 3, 1992, as further red -line revised, as per
Attachment No. 3, be Approved subject to the conditions
contained in this report;
3. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized, by by -law, to execute
a Subdivision Agreement between the Owner and the Municipality
at such time as the agreement has been finalized to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and the Director
of Planning;
4. THAT the attached amendment to By -law 84 -63 be Approved and
that the "Holding (H)" symbol be removed by By -law upon
execution of a Subdivision Agreement;
5. THAT a copy of this Report and Council's decision be forwarded
to the Region of Durham Planning Department; and
6. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any
delegation be advised of Council's decision.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 Applicant: Schickedanz Bros. Limited
1.2 Agent: Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd.
1.3 Rezoning Application:
from "Agricultural (A)", to an appropriate
zone to permit the development of a proposed
plan of subdivision.
0
P E"
PAPEL ECYC E
—i1 en 1e 1 nN DEC— FD PAPER
REPORT NO. PD -1 -95 PAGE 2
1.4 Subdivision: proposing to develop 45 single family dwelling
units, 37 lots for semi - detached /link
dwellings (74 units) , 45 street townhouse
units for a total of 164 units.
1.5 Land Area: 9.95 Ha (24.58 Acres)
2. LOCATION
2.1 The subject property is located in Part Lot 10, Concession 2,
Former Town of Bowmanville. The property is generally located
north of the Canadian Pacific Railway line and on the east
side of Regional Road 14 (Liberty Street).
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 An application for Zoning By -law Amendment was originally
received by the Planning and Development Department in July of
1987, with notice, from the Region of Durham, of the
application for a proposed Plan of Subdivision following
shortly thereafter. Public Meeting for the rezoning
application was undertaken in accordance with Council policy
and the requirements of the Planning Act and held on September
21, 1987. The original application proposed a slightly
different road pattern with 93 semi - detached /link units for
186 dwelling units.
3.2 In April of 1990, the Planning Department was advised of a
revised subdivision application. The revised application has
reduced the proposed number of dwelling units by 22, while
providing a greater overall unit mix.
3.3 The revised subdivision and rezoning applications were
circulated concurrently in May of 1990. Due to the
significance of the changes proposed and the time elapsed a
second Public Meeting was required for the revised
application. Said meeting was held in January of 1991.
r . .
�� . 3
REPORT NO. PD -1 -95 PAGE 3
4 EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES
4.1 The subject lands are currently vacant and have been used for
agricultural production in the past.
4.2 Surrounding land uses include:
South: the Canadian Pacific Railway and lands currently
being developed residentially through registered
plans 1OM -829 and 10M -830.
East: agricultural land containing a residential unit, as
well as lands subject to Draft Approved development
application (18T- 89064).
North: existing units fronting of Liberty Street as well
as vacant lands subject to development applications
(18T- 90036).
West: existing strip residential fronting on Liberty
Street, lands subject to development application
(18T- 92004), and existing residential development
on the west side of Liberty Street.
5. PUBLIC MEETING AND RESPONSE
5.1 Pursuant to Council's resolution of July 26, 1982 and the
requirements of the Planning Act, the appropriate signage
acknowledging the application was installed on the subject
lands for both the initial notice as well as the revised
application. In addition notice was mailed to all residents
within the prescribed distance.
6 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
6.1 Within the Durham Regional Official Plan the subject property
is designated "Living Area ". The living area policies encourage
residential development with a variety of housing mix and
type. The application would appear to conform.
6.2 Within the former Town of Newcastle Official Plan, Bowmanville
Major Urban Area the subject property is located in
....4
U
REPORT NO. PD -1 -95 PAGE 4
Neighbourhood 112C" and is designated "Low Density
Residential ". Said neighbourhood has a population target of
5500 people. The 164 units is considered to be in general
conformity with the neighbourhood population target.
Furthermore, it would be in conformity with the 30 unit per
net hectare maximum for low density designation development.
7 AGENCY COMMENTS
7.1 In accordance with departmental procedure the subject
application was circulated to a number of agencies and
departments for comment.
7.2 The Municipality of Clarington Public Works Department has
advised that they have no objection to the application in
principle, however numerous comments relating to conditions of
draft approval have been provided. Public Work Staff have
provided considerable discussion with respect to service
connections required for the development. The servicing of
this development will require the installation of sidewalks on
Liberty Street which are external to the plan of subdivision.
Should the application be approved, one of the condition of
approval would require that prior to the development being
permitted to proceed the Municipality has approved the
expenditure of funds for the installation of the Liberty
Street sidewalk.
The Public Works Department has advised the applicant that it
is his responsibility financial and otherwise to provide a
satisfactory connection to the existing infrastructure of
roads and sidewalks. As a result this development will be
responsible for the full, reconstruction of the Liberty
Street /Meadowview Boulevard /Street B intersection. In
addition this work will require the purchase of road widenings
at the north -east and south -west quadrants of the intersection
to facilitate the re- construction of the intersection.
....5
REPORT NO. PD -1 -95 PAGE 5
The developer must satisfy the Director of Public Works and
the Director of Planning and Development that they have made
every effort to acquire these road widenings. In the event
that the developer is unable to acquire the required road
widenings and the Director's of Public Works and Planning and
Development are satisfied that all reasonable efforts have
been made by the developer to acquire these lands, the
Municipality may consider expropriation as a means to resolve
the required acquisition.
The developer will be responsible in the form of unconditional
and irrevocable letters of credit,for all monies to:
a) appraise the value of the property;
b) purchase the road widenings, including costs of
expropriation;
C) road reconstruction including sidewalk installation
costs; and
d) administration and any other cost deemed necessary by the
Directors of Public Works and Planning and Development.
The developer is responsible for a lot grading and drainage
plan, detailing both major and minor storm drainage. The
developer is responsible for the construction of all
stormwater management works required for this sub - watershed,
in accordance with the West Branch of the Soper Creek Master
Drainage Study, dated May 1991. Prior to the detailed
engineering submission, the developer's agent shall submit a
Stormwater Management Implementation Report detailing all
storm quantity and quality control facilities, erosion
protection measures, conveyance of storm drainage, both major
and minor systems from the site, as well as the proposed
location of the storm connection. The developer shall pay his
share of the Soper Creek Erosion Control Works and shall pay
all legal costs associated with the preparation and execution
of a pipe crossing agreement between the Municipality and the
C.P.R Railway for the installation of the storm sewer beneath
the railway tracks. .... 6
REPORT NO. PD -1 -95 PAGE 6
In addition to the above comments and conditions, a number of
standard conditions of draft approval regarding, reserves,
service locations, road radii, etc were requested and will be
reflected in the conditions of draft approval.
7.3 The Community Services Department advised they have no
objection to the application. The parkland dedication for
this application will be based on the equivalent of 1 ha of
land per 300 dwelling units. Block 98 will be accepted as a
parkette, with any under dedication being received as cash -in-
lieu of parkland. Grading for the pond (block 97) will not be
accepted on the park block, and will not be part of the
parkland dedication. Block 97 shall be accepted gratuitously
as open space and be appropriately graded and grassed. The
grading of block 97 will be such that it may accommodate a
flat pedestrian access from the south -west to north -east (18T-
89064) to the satisfaction of the Director of Community
Services. Block 99 and 100, requiring berming shall also be
developed and landscaped to the satisfaction of the Director
of Community Services.
7.4 The Fire Department advised they have no objection to this
proposal provided all access routes comply with the Ontario
Fire and Building Code.
7.5 The Peterborough Victoria Northumberland and Newcastle
Separate School Board advised that the students generated from
this development can be accommodated in the existing or
proposed schools (18T- 82037) and therefore have no objection.
7.6 The Northumberland and Newcastle Board of Education advised
that they have some concern with the proposal. The Board
requires sidewalks on the interior roads and sidewalks on
Liberty Street.
X06 ....7
REPORT NO. PD -1 -95 PAGE 7
7.7 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority has not
provided formal comments on the revised plan of subdivision.
Comments previously received on the original proposed plan of
subdivision (May 30, 1989) advised the subject lands are
located in the area being investigated by the Soper Creek
Tributary Master Drainage Plan. (Said Study has since been
completed). The drainage plan had identified increased
flooding and erosion downstream of Concession Street as a
result of development in the watershed. It has been
determined that site specific flood and erosion control
facilities will not be required on this site. However,
downstream controls and /or easements should be in place before
development of this plan. The Authority provided no objection
to the approval of the application subject to a number of
conditions. During more recent verbal discussion with CLOCA
representatives, Staff were advised of concerns regarding the
proposed pond which required attention prior to issuance of
Draft Approval. Public Works Staff have no objection to the
pond subject to conditions of approval.
7.8 The Canadian Pacific Railway has provided comments opposing
the application as it abuts their rail corridor . However,
they further advised should the application be approved they
have requested a number of conditions be imposed at Draft
Approval. This includes a berm, or combination berm and noise
attenuation fence; clauses registered on title and included
in the purchase and sale agreements of specified dwellings
warning of the noise and vibration; minimum dwelling setback
of 30 metres; and various conditions with respect to the
construction of the proposed dwellings.
7.9 The Ministry of the Environment has provided comment on the
application and noise study prepared by Marshall Macklin
Monaghan Limited (July 1990) and find it to be consistent with
provincial policy on noise. The Ministry has provided no
objection to draft approval of the application subject to
conditions of approval. ••••8
.. �Uf
REPORT NO. PD -1 -95 PAGE 8
7.10 The Ministry of Natural Resources has reviewed the revised
proposal and provided no objection to the development subject
to conditions of approval. This includes conditions of
approval with regard to stormwater management, erosion and
sediment control and alterations to the watercourse.
7.11 Regional Public Works have commented that the proposed plan of
subdivision is within zone II water supply system for
Bowmanville. Sanitary Sewer can be provided from existing
services on the south side of the C.P.R. tracks. Furthermore,
they noted the need for 5.12 m road widenings and 12 x 6 metre
sight triangles on Liberty Street.
8 STAFF COMMENTS
8.1 The plan of subdivision proposes to create 164 residential
units and blocks for six future residential units. The
subdivision will have two access points to Regional Road 14.
8.2 Staff have raised concerns with regard to the proposed north
access to Liberty Street as it relates to intersection design
and safety. The proposed street "B" road allowance is offset
from Meadowview Boulevard on the west side of Liberty Street.
The applicant's engineer has designed an intersection which
attempts to align the road pavement while minimizing the area
required for road widening (Attachment No. 2) . Liberty Street
is under the jurisdiction of the Regional Works Department.
Staff have been advised that Regional Works are satisfied with
the design proposed. The Municipality's Public Works
Department also concurs with the submitted design..
8.3 In October Staff forwarded letters to the homeowners that
would be impacted by the proposed widening. A copy of
Attachment No. 2 was included in the correspondence to better
illustrate the potential impact. Staff have not been
contacted by either of the home owners in response to the
....9
REPORT NO. PD -1 -95 PAGE 9
letter. The proposed conditions of Draft Approval would
provide the Municipality sufficient security for the road
widening and associated construction costs.
8.4 The proposed road connections from the subdivision to the
north and east, Draft Approved plans 18T -90036 and 18T -89064
respectively, appear to be consistent. The plan has a good
mix of units, proposing larger singles abutting existing
singles on Liberty Street, semi - detached link units generally
buffering between the singles and the townhouse units, and the
townhouse units are predominantly located on a single sided
road. The subdivision has been designed without having
residential units backing onto the railway tracks.
8.5 The C.P.R. rail corridor provides the largest noise impact on
the subdivision, with Liberty Street being identified as a
second source. Noise fencing is not required for the receiver
area (rear yard) of the townhouse units as a result of the
design of the subdivision, however these units must be
constructed with air conditioning units to mitigate noise
levels. Acoustical fencing will be required in the side and
rear yard locations for the first four lots abutting the open
space block and closest to the railway (lots 70 to 66), for
protection from the railway. Fencing will also be required
for the rear and side yards of the lots abutting Liberty
Street (lots 35 and 45).
8.6 Block 98 will provide for a small parkette, while the majority
of the neighbourhoods park needs are being provided through
adjacent and existing developments. Block 98 has been red-
line revised to remove the area required for grading of the
pond. The open space block will have a minimum 3:1 slope for
water containment, however provision will be made for a
pedestrian walkway from street A to lands to the east and
north.
....10
���)9
REPORT NO. PD -1 -95 PAGE 10
9 CONCLUSION
9.1 In consideration of the above noted comments Staff would
recommend approval of the application for the proposed Plan of
Subdivision to permit the development of a total 164 units,
subject to the conditions contained in Attachment No. 3. As
well, staff would recommend approval of the attached zoning
by -law amendment, subject to the removal of the holding symbol
at such time as the appropriate subdivision agreement has been
executed.
Respectfully submitted,
t,
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P.
Director of Planning
and Development
CP *FW *cc
Reviewed by,
W. H. - Stoc],;�wel l
Chief Administrative
Officer
Attachment No. 1 - Key Map
Attachment No. 2 - Proposed Intersection Design and Widenings
Attachment No. 3 - Conditions of Draft Approval
Attachment No. 4 - Zoning By -law Amendment
December 23, 1994
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's
decision:
John Kennedy
Marshall Macklin Monaghan
Limited
275 Duncan Mills Road
DON MILLS, Ontario M3B 2Y1
Bob Schickedanz
Schickedanz Bros. Limited
3311 Bayview Avenue
Suite 105
WILLOWDALE, Ontario M2K 1G4
David Payne
227 Liberty St. N.,
Bowmanville, Ont. L1C 2M6
Randy Norrish
239 Liberty St. N.,
Bowmanville, Ont. L1C 2M6 -
Leonard Goodmurphy
223 Liberty St. N.,
Bowmanville, Ont L1C
2M6
Jim A. Colville
245 Liberty St. N.,
Bowmanville, Ont L1C
2M6
Peter Murdock
243 Liberty St. N.,
Bowmanville, Ont L1C
2M6
Elgin & Elizabeth Martin
244 Liberty St. N.,
Bowmanville, Ont L1C
2M6
5 i 0
ATTACHMENT ,#`1
DEVm 87�051;7
,
FUTURE SIDEWALK
W
w
cr-
U)
H
LaJ
m
mj
L_ - - - -1
,
1 ,
1 1
1 I
j EXISTING HOUSE
I �
I i ---
1 I
,
,
r-
, , r
EXISTING DRIVEWAY
STREET 'E3 I
i
•
•
H
H
n
H
N
EXISTING ROAD AND CURBING
-- PROPOSED ROAD -: —:- EXISTING SIDEWALK
PROPOSED ROAD WIDENING _> PROPOSED SIDEWALK
••••• ULTIMATE ROAD WIDENING / / / / / / //: ULTIMATE SIDEWALK
ATTACHMENT ,#`3
DN: DEV87059.GPA
PLAN IDENTIFICATION
1. That this approval applies to draft Plan of Subdivision 18T -87057 prepared by Marshall
Macklin Monaghan Limited dated (revised) December 3, 1992 (and further revised in red
as per the attached plan) showing 45 lots for single family detached dwellings, 37 lots (74
units) for semi - detached or linked dwellings, 7 blocks (45 units) for townhouse development,
Block 98 for park, Block 97 for Open Space, Blocks 99 and 100 for noise attenuation and
various blocks for reserve, road widening, site triangle etc.
FINAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS
2. That all streets within the Plan of Subdivision shall be dedicated as public highway and
shown as such on the final plan.
3. That all streets shall be named to the satisfaction of the Municipality of Clarington and
shown on the final plan.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
4. That the Owner shall retain a qualified landscape architect to prepare and submit a
Landscaping Plan to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and
Development for review and approval. The Landscaping Plan shall reflect the design criteria
of the Municipality as amended from time to time.
5. That the Owner shall retain a qualified landscape architect to prepare and submit a Park
Site Master Plan to the Director of Community Services for review and approval. The said
Plan shall reflect the design standard of the Municipality as amended from time to time.
2
-2-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
11111FRIF 1174 1 111
6. That the Owner shall retain a professional engineer to prepare and submit a Master
Drainage and Lot Grading Plan to the Director of Public Works for review and approval.
All plans and drawings must conform to the Municipality's Design Criteria as amended from
time to time.
7. That the Owner shall retain a qualified consultant to prepare and submit a Tree
Preservation plan to the Director of planning and Development for review and approval.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
8. That the Owner shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Municipality and agree
to abide by all terms and conditions of the Municipality's standard subdivision agreement,
including, but not limited to, the requirements that follow.
9. That all easements, road widening, and reserves as required by the Municipality shall be
granted to the Municipality free and clear of all encumbrances.
10. That the Owner shall dedicate Block 98 as red -lined revised for park purposes and further
agrees to pay to the Municipality at the time of execution of the subdivision agreement,
cash -in -lieu of parkland dedication, equal to 1 ha per 300 dwelling units for the under
dedication of land. No building permit beyond 25% of the entire subdivision shall be issued
until such time as the park has been conveyed to the Municipality in a graded condition to
the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services.
11. That the Owner shall pay to the Municipality,. the development charge in accordance to the
Development Charge By -law as amended from time to time, as well as payment of a portion
of front end charges pursuant to the Development Charge Act if any are required to be paid
by the owner. ... 3
-3-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONTU
12. That the Owner shall provide and install sidewalks, street lights, temporary turning circles
etc. as per the Municipality's standards and criteria.
13. That the Owner shall cause all utilities, including, hydro, telephone, Cable TV, etc. to be
buried underground and that the developer assumes all costs for provision, installation and
location of Community Mailboxes to service this subdivision.
14. That the Owner shall provide the Municipality, at the time of execution of the subdivision
agreement unconditional and irrevocable, Letters of Credit acceptable to the Municipality's
Treasurer, with respect to Performance Guarantee, Maintenance Guarantee, Occupancy
Deposit and other guarantees or deposit as may be required by the Municipality.
15. That the Owner shall adhere to architectural control requirements of the Municipality.
16. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Owner shall, through its acoustic
engineer, to provide a certification to the Director of Planning, certifying that the Builder's
plans are in accordance with the Noise Control Report as approved by the Ministry of the
Environment and the Municipality of Clarington.
17. That prior to the issuance of building permits, access routes to the subdivision must be
provided to meet Subsection 3.2.5.2(6) of the Ontario Building Code and, that all
watermains and hydrants are fully serviced and the Owner agrees that during construction,
fire access routes be maintained according to Subsection 2.5.1.2 of the Ontario Fire Code,
storage of combustible waste be maintained as per Subsection 2.4.1.1 and open burning as
per Subsection 2.6.3.4 of the Ontario Fire Code.
...4
�j 1 J
-4-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONTD)
18. This development shall not proceed until such time as the Municipality's Capital Budget has
been approved, including the expenditure of funds for the installation of the Liberty Street
sidewalk and any other external works, as deemed necessary by the Director of Public
Works to service this development.
19.a) The developer will be responsible for a road connection to Liberty Street (Regional Road
14), and a sidewalk connection to the future extension of sidewalk referred to in condition
# 18. This work will include the full reconstruction of the Liberty Street/Meadowview
Boulevard /Street "B" intersection. In addition, this work will require the purchase of road
widenings at the north -east and south -west quadrants of the intersection to facilitate the
installation of sidewalks in their ultimate location.
b) The developer must satisfy the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and
Development that the developer has made every effort to acquire these road widenings.
Accordingly, all written communications between the developer and the abutting property
owner should be copied to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and
Development for their information.
c) Should the developer be unable to obtain the required road widenings for the road and
sidewalk connection works and the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning
and Development are satisfied that the developer has made all reasonable efforts to acquire
these lands, then the Municipality may consider "expropriation" as a means to resolve this
road widening acquisition concern on behalf of the developer.
d) The developer would be responsible for the necessary security (in the forms of
unconditional and irrevocable letter of Credit), for all monies to: (a) appraise the value
of property; (b) purchase the road widenings, including costs of expropriation; (c) road
construction costs; and (d) administration and any other costs as deemed necessary by the
Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and Development.
-5-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
20. That the developer is responsible for the costs of all construction works (roads, sewers,
utilities, etc.) required for the connection of Regional Road 14 to the internal streets. the
developer will be responsible for all costs (including road widening land acquisition, legal,
survey, etc.) associated with the intersection reconstruction of Regional Road 14, Street "B"
and Meadowview Boulevard (both east and west sides). All necessary approvals associated
with this reconstruction must be obtained from the Region of Durham and submitted in
writing to the Director of Public Works;
21. That horizontal radius on Street "A" in the vicinity of lot 42 be increased as shown in red
on the attached plan to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works;
22. That 0.3 m reserves (shown on the plan as Blocks 101, 102, 105, 107 and 108) abutting
Streets A, B, C, E and F are transferred to the Municipality for the purpose of controlling
access and for the sequential development of lands abutting these streets;
23. That both sides of all internal street be fully serviced with water, sanitary sewer, hydro,
telephone and cable television for any future lots which may front onto any internal streets;
24. That temporary turning circles are provided at the terminus of Streets B, C and E and that
Lots 26, 27 and 46 to 50, inclusive, be frozen until such time that these streets are extended
and a finished urban roadway including asphalt paving, curb and gutter, sodded boulevard,
sidewalk and street lighting has been constructed abutting these lots;
25. That the developer's engineer prepares a Lot Grading and Drainage Plan that details the
conveyance of storm drainage, both Major and Minor systems from this site. In addition,
this grading and drainage plan should specify the location of the storm connection and to
which existing storm sewer system the developer proposes to connect. Further comments
may be necessary for to deal with this matter.
W
26. That the developer is responsible for the construction of all stormwater management works
required for this sub - watershed, in accordance with the West Branch of Soper Creek Master
Drainage Study, dated May 1991, prepared by Marshall Macklin Monaghan and as finally
approved by the Director of Public Works. This will require the installation of oversized
stormwater drainage works (ie. storm sewers and stormwater management facility).
27. That prior to the detailed engineering submission, the developer's engineer prepares a
Stormwater Management implementation Report that details all storm quantity and quality
control facilities, erosion protection measures, conveyance of storm drainage, both o the
and minor systems from this site. In addition, the report should specify the location
storm connection and to which existing storm sewer system the developer proposes to
connect. This report shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works.
28. That the developer is required to pay to the Municipality his share of the costs of the Soper
Creek Erosion Control Works. The costs will be included in the development agreement
and payable upon execution of the agreement.
29. That a pipe crossing agreement be entered into between the Municipality and the Canadian
Pacific Railway for the installation of storm sewer beneath the railway tracks, which are
required to service this plan of subdivision.
30. The developer will be responsible for all legal costs associated with the preparation and
execution of this agreement and the design and construction cost for this storm sewer, to
the satisfaction to the Director of Public Works;
ATTAC1l MENT #4
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY -LAW NUMBER 95-
being a By -law to amend By -law 84 -63, the Comprehensive Zoning By -law for the former Town
of Newcastle.
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington has recommended
approval to the Region of Durham of proposed red -line revisions to draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-
87057.
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable
to amend By -law 84 -63, as amended, of the former Town of Newcastle to implement the red -line
revised draft Plan of Subdivision.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the
Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows:
1. Schedule "3" to By -law 84 -63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone
designation from:
"Agricultural (A)" to "Urban Residential Type One - Holding ((H)Rl) ";
"Agricultural (A)" to "Urban Residential Type Two - Holding ((H)R2) ";
"Agricultural (A)" to "Urban Residential Type Three - Holding ((H)R3) "; and
"Agricultural (A)" to "Environmental Protection (EP)';
as shown on the attached Schedule "A" hereto.
2. Schedule "A" attached hereto shall form part of this By -law.
3. This By -law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the
provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act.
BY -LAW read a first time this
BY -LAW read a second time this
day of 1995.
day of 1995.
BY -LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of
L I
1995.
MAYOR
CLERK
This is Schedule "A" to By -law 95-
passed this—day of—,1995A.D.
LOT 10
N71*47'10"E 356-49
�jj /�
:,
45-727
/ / % % % % % % % / %� %� / % %O / /%%
z NW04'40"E 290-38
W X
W Ch
•
ow
Jt
U)
Lo
N71o(
W ...
_j
41 18z
X. X
CONCESSION 2
ZON I NG CHANGE FRO MW TO'(H)
R I'
'1 'TO'(H)R3'
'A'TO,'EP'
Mayor
Clark
fin,. a
�/ .
•
H
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
31. That the developer enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Municipality including all
requirements of the Public Works Department regarding the engineering and construction
f all internal and external works and services related to this plan of subdivision. In addition,
the Subdivision Agreement will include a "Staging Plan" or any other provisions that will
control the sequential development of this subdivision in conjunction with the installation
of sidewalk on Regional Road 14 and the construction of the intersection of Liberty Street,
Meadowview Boulevard and Street "B ", to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
32. That the developer construct a pedestrian walkway system from Street "A" to tie in with the
proposed pedestrian link in Draft Approved 18T -89064 to the satisfaction of the Director
of Community Services.
33. That the applicant provide the Municipality in CAD format a copy of the proposed plan of
subdivision as Approved.
34. That the developer satisfy the requirements financial and otherwise of Central Lake Ontario
Conservation Authority.
35. That the developer satisfy the requirements financial and otherwise of Ministry of Natural
Resources.
36. That the developer satisfy the requirements financial and otherwise of Canadian Pacific
Railway.
t
CD
UTHO'RIZ4110N
' • yt • ' �l��• / • - � • .:�: , <+r wu�a •aa�enreiw+ M �.��tr r?\.
VACANT
' - 4,. •'t•ar..L.. '4, ..ems,•- ,� •�• •C•ANO � •� •:Sxt•. "•..:.:' -
;:: ° -t ,;•. , y -. i.;r t; �f,SURV. �ERTIFICAI E , y: e-
r'/ "+ � �� Q�tfT pYiit �dn6: >�M l:w'�o eC saeniu y
. a. _4= • +' .:>' :�'" •.s .:.. a1w rGiawo Tu.wta"s-�o.M•ormR U•a• ••[
'f� /'�1{'/y. ~� ♦•• mumv'acw .x•ws :m � rw or awm e.
~' 1.• . � I -: : �..; •.l ' •tar!<�: 'vmw Yowwy4N�o'NeRm'Mtm wit a:Mn : 4«••,..a
~ {;' ~''.�• .� '7., . {r''� ': i:: 1- ufl,ESIGt�EF}.S:'CEE2TIF�CATE• 3',p•<•'�e �-,g
/' LC " -' 3' r / ~ °.s�M' �`� .: ! _i •.�YUUy1y w�f�� �outaul p1 . k At�N- j ,,...
.. •-rte ••rr. -anr t•to•e - .weaw•r <..n.w••.
:y 'w k 1 a • i,t ' •-jti,� � a /�* (y�AR•Cid+..K?k..yl�nw6,� �. SddTRIL702K
Emu
- , • ,
slim
9
aisi.
tsau.mzmwwm
.sae.
.
,��tr�'r"��f�
J
a�os...ri�
...u..aw
st � =Y�;�
/ � • � 1 1 - ,
r
JIVA
��
...
11) IVR; Ell
Will
WN
ZMA
UTHO'RIZ4110N
' • yt • ' �l��• / • - � • .:�: , <+r wu�a •aa�enreiw+ M �.��tr r?\.
VACANT
' - 4,. •'t•ar..L.. '4, ..ems,•- ,� •�• •C•ANO � •� •:Sxt•. "•..:.:' -
;:: ° -t ,;•. , y -. i.;r t; �f,SURV. �ERTIFICAI E , y: e-
r'/ "+ � �� Q�tfT pYiit �dn6: >�M l:w'�o eC saeniu y
. a. _4= • +' .:>' :�'" •.s .:.. a1w rGiawo Tu.wta"s-�o.M•ormR U•a• ••[
'f� /'�1{'/y. ~� ♦•• mumv'acw .x•ws :m � rw or awm e.
~' 1.• . � I -: : �..; •.l ' •tar!<�: 'vmw Yowwy4N�o'NeRm'Mtm wit a:Mn : 4«••,..a
~ {;' ~''.�• .� '7., . {r''� ': i:: 1- ufl,ESIGt�EF}.S:'CEE2TIF�CATE• 3',p•<•'�e �-,g
/' LC " -' 3' r / ~ °.s�M' �`� .: ! _i •.�YUUy1y w�f�� �outaul p1 . k At�N- j ,,...
.. •-rte ••rr. -anr t•to•e - .weaw•r <..n.w••.
:y 'w k 1 a • i,t ' •-jti,� � a /�* (y�AR•Cid+..K?k..yl�nw6,� �. SddTRIL702K