HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-128-94DN: COFA.GPA I REPORT
Meeting:
Date:
Report #:
General Purpose
Monday, October
PD- 128 -94 File
and Administration Committee
17, 1994
A94/038 to A94/040
File #
Rey. #
By-Law #
Subject:
MONITORING OF THE
DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE
OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR THE MEETING
OF OCTOBER 6, 1994
FILE: A94/038
AND A94/040
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD- 128 -94 be received;
2. THAT Council concur with the decision of the Committee of
Adjustment made on October 6, 1994; and
3. THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario
Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of
Adjustment in the event of an appeal.
1.1 In accordance with Section 45 of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990,
all applications received by the Municipality for minor
variance are scheduled to be heard within 30 days of being
received by the Secretary Treasurer. The Committee heard
three (3) applications for minor variance approving one and
tabling two. Details of each application and decision of the
Committee is attached for information.
1.2 Application A 93/038 and A 94/039 were TABLED by the Committee
of Adjustment. One of the residents in opposition to the
applications questioned the accuracy of the circulation
notice. In addition, the applicant was not present in support
of the application. Staff will confirm the accuracy of the
original circulation and re- schedule the application to the
next available meeting.
....2
936
THG 5 PRIMED - RECYCLED PAPER
REPORT NO.: PD- 118 -94 PAGE 2
1.3 Staff have reviewed the Committee's decision and are satisfied
that they conform to the general intent of the Official Plan
and the Zoning By -law are minor in nature and desirable.
1.3 Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment
decisions is required in order to afford Staff's official
status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an
appeal of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment.
Respectfully submitted,
`o.
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P.
Director of Planning
and Development
CP *FW *cc
*Attach.
7 October 1994
Reviewed by,
W. H. Stockwell`
Chief Administrative
Officer
5 3 �
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A94/038
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
APPLICANT: ROTON INVESTMENTS LTD.
AGENT: ALDO FIRMANI
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
MILL STREET S., NEWCASTLE, ONT
PART LOT: 27 CONCESSION: BF
TOWNSHIP: CLARKE
ZONING: RC1 & Al
HEARING DATE: 6- Oct -94
DECISION: TABLED
APPEAL DATE: 5- Nov -94
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CREATE A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LOT HAVING
A FRONTAGE OF 45M (147.6 FT.), MINIMUM REQUIRED 50M (164 FT.)
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICANT WAS NOT IN ATTENDANCE AT THE MEETING, THE
APPLICATION BE TABLED TO ALLOW THE APPLICATION TO BE RE- CIRCULATED
AND HAVE THE APPLICANT ATTEND THE MEETING
538
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A94/039
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
APPLICANT: ROTON INVESTMENTS LTD.
AGENT:' ALDO FIRMANI
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
MILL STREET S. NEWCASTLE, ONT.
PART LOT: 27 CONCESSION: BF
TOWNSHIP: CLARKE
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: RC1 & Al
HEARING DATE: 6- Oct -94
DECISION: TABLED
APPEAL DATE: 5- Nov -94
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CREATE A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LOT,
HAVING A FRONTAGE OF 45M (147.6 FT.), MINIMUM REQUIRED 50M (164
FT.)
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICANT WAS NOT IN ATTENDANCE AT THE MEETING, THE
APPLICATION BE TABLED TO ALLOW THE APPLICATION TO BE RE- CIRCULATED
AND HAVE THE APPLICANT ATTEND THE MEETING
539
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FILE NUMBER: A94/040
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
APPLICANT: MARGARET BEAUPRE
AGENT: HARRY SCHILLINGS
PERIODIC REPORT
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
3730 CONCESSION ROAD 81 ORONO, ONT.
PART LOT: 24 CONCESSION: 8
TOWNSHIP: CLARKE
I!jRANi��i��i:
ZONING: Al
HEARING DATE: 6- Oct -94
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 5- Nov -94
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CREATE A LOT HAVING A LOT AREA OF 10.072
HA (24.89 AC), AS OPPOSED TO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED 40HA.
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION WAS DEEMED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY -LAW, THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED AS
APPLIED FOR.
54U