Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSD-049-04 " CJ. ~ L~!J!n]gla REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Monday, May 3, 2004 Report #: PSD-049-04 File #: A2004/011 & A2004/012 (J.,M ~.2;, 'b'-t> '+ By-law #: Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF APRIL 15, 2004 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-049-04 be received; and 2. THAT Council concurs with the decision of the Committee of Adjustment made on April 15, 2004 for applications A2004/011 and A2004/012 and that Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment. Submitted by: D i Crome, MCIP, R.P.P. Director of Planning Services /j~ \~ Reviewed by: \..... ~ , Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer TW*L T*DJC*sh April 16, 2004 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 601 REPORT NO.: PSD-049-04 PAGE 2 1.0 APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 All applications received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled for a hearing within 30 days of being received by the Secretary-Treasurer. The purpose of the minor variance application and the Committee's decisions are detailed in Attachment 1. The decisions of the Committee are detailed below. DECISIONS OF COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR APRIL 15, 2004 Application Number Staff Recommendation Decision of Committee A2004/011 Approve A2004/012 Approve Approved Approved 2.0 COMMENTS 2.1 A2004/011 was to permit the reduction of the exterior side yard setback to facilitate the construction of a new semi-detached dwelling with the model chosen by the applicant's client. Staff recommended that the application be approved and the Committee concurred. 2.2 A2004/012 was to permit the construction of an addition in the rear yard of a single detached dwelling. Staff recommended that the application be approved and the Committee concurred. 2.3 Staff has reviewed the Committee's decisions and is satisfied that the applications that received approval are in conformity with the Official Plan policies, consistent with the intent of the Zoning By-law and are minor in nature and desirable. Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment decisions is required in order to afford Staffs official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an appeal of any decision of the Committee of Adjustment. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Periodic Report for the Committee of Adjustment 602 ATTACHMENT 1 ~{lJ!mgton PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: OWNER: PROPERTY LOCATION: PERDUE, JOHN / LEGENDS CONSULTING ST. STEPHENS ESTATES 120 HUTTON PL. BOWMANVILLE PART LOT 8, CONCESSION 2 FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF BOWMANVILLE A2004/0 11 FILE NO.: PURPOSE: TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SEMI-DETACHED DWELLING BY REDUCING THE EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 6 M TO 5.14 M. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED BY REDUCING THE EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 6 METRES TO 5.14 METRES AS IT IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AND IS DEEMED TO BE MINOR AND DESIRABLE DATE OF DECISION: April 15, 2004 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: May 5, 2004 603 Clfllmgton PERIODIC REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICANT: OWNER: PROPERTY LOCATION: GOULAH, JOSEPH AND MARY GOULAH, JOSEPH AND MARY 317 MILL ST.N., NEWCASTLE VILLAGE PART LOT 28, CONCESSION 2 FORMER TOWN(SHIP) OF NEWCASTLE VILLAGE A2004/012 FILE NO.: PURPOSE: TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 7.5 METRES TO 6.14 METRES TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING DWELLING. DECISION OF COMMITTEE: THAT APPLICATION BE APPROVED TO REDUCE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 7.5 M TO 6.14 M TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING DWELLING AS IT IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OP & ZBL & IS DEEMED TO BE MINOR & DESIRABLE DATE OF DECISION: April 15, 2004 LAST DAY OF APPEAL: May 5, 2004 604