HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-62-89DN: 13.
i
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
MEETING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
5 (k)
/,0. 3o. r �'
F le #, .o, 0 e
Res. #
By -Law #
DATE: Monday, March 6, 1989
REPORT #: PD -62 -89 FILE #: OPA 87 -29 D DEV 87 -88, 18T -87076
SIRJECT: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING & SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS
APPLICANT: 542985 ONTARIO LIMITED
PART LOT 15, CONCESSION 3, FORMER TWP. OF DARLINGTON
FILES: OPA 87 -29/D, DEV 87 -88, AND 18T -87076
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD -62 -89 be received; and
2. THAT the official Plan Amendment submitted by 542985 Ontario Limited to
permit the development of a seven (7) lot estate residential subdivision
be DENIED; and
3. THAT the accompanying Rezoning and Subdivision applications be DENIED; and
4. THAT the Region of Durham, the applicant and the applicant's agent be so
advised.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 On May 27, 1987, the Town received notice from the Region of Durham of an
application submitted by 542985 Ontario Limited to amend the Durham
Regional Official Plan to permit the creation of seven (7) estate
residential lots in Part Lot 15, Concession 3, Darlington Township (see Key
...2
580
'a" • v • :'
PAGE 2
Map). Subsequently, on November 2, 1987, the applicant submitted an
application to rezone the subject lands to permit the proposed development.
The site is also the subject of a subdivision application 18T- 87076.
1.2 On January 4, 1988, the General Purpose and Administration Committee
resolved to refer the applications submitted by 542985 Ontario Limited
back to staff pending resolution of various concerns.
2. OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS
2.1 The lands are designated "Major Open Space" with indications of
"Hazard Lands" and "Environmental Sensitivity" in the Regional
Official Plan. The lands are zoned "Agricultural (A)" and
"Environmental Protection (EP)" within the Town's Comprehensive Zoning
By -law 84 -63. The subject site has a total area of 5.4 ha of which
only 2.5 ha is proposed for residential development. The remainder of
the lands corresponds to lands associated with the floodplain of
Bowmanville Creek.
3. PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS
3.1 No public submissions have been received to date.
4. CIRCULATION
4.1 The subject application was circulated by the Town of Newcastle and
Region of Durham to various agencies and departments to obtain
comments. The following agencies /departments offered no objection to
the proposal:
- Public School Board
- Separate School Board
- Ministry of Agriculture & Food
The following agencies /departments offered no objection to the
principle of this proposal, but did outline conditions for Draft
Approval:
- Newcastle Public Works Department
- Newcastle Community Services Department
- Regional Works Department
- Regional. Health Services
581 ...3
4.2 The Town of Newcastle Fire Department expressed concern to the
PAGE 3
application. This development represents seven (7) residential units,
which will result in a population increase of approximately 21
persons. The part-time Fire Department (4 fulltime firefighters) will
not be able to maintain the existing level of emergency service,
considering all of the development that is taking place throughout the
Municipality.
This development is within the five mile limit of Station 1 for
insurance purposes. Water will be supplied by Fire Department tanker.
4.3 The Ministry of Natural Resources noted that the Bowmanville Creek
and associated valley system are located on the western portion of
this property. The watercourse is a significant cold water trout
stream which is sensitive to water quality degradation. On site
activities which may cause erosion must be carefully controlled to
prevent excess sedimentation of the creek. The Ministry further noted
that they support the "Major Open Space", "Hazard Land", and
"Environmental Sensitive Area" designations of the Durham Region
Official Plan and the "Environmental Protection (EP)II zone of the Town
of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63, corresponding to the
Bowmanville Creek and associated valley system.
4.4 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority notes that it received
a report dated June, 1988 from Hydroterra Limited which addresses
their previous concerns. However, the need for raised tile fields due
to high groundwater has not yet been completely evaluated. Central
Lake Ontario Conservation Authority noted that this concern can be
addressed through conditions of draft approval.
Finally, the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority asserted:
...4
582
REPORT NO.: PD -62 -89 PAGE 4
"We wish to recommend to the Town that it adopt specific
rural - residential and estate - residential policies before entertaining
further such applications. The relevant policies of the Regional
Official Plan specify that estate developments are to be limited in
number, scale and location, and to be of a nature such that the
character of the natural environment is maintained. Many of our
concerns for forests, wildlife habitat, streams, and areas of high
water table are centred in the rural area, which is where these
developments occur.
If a given number of well spaced estate developments was to be
appropriately located across the countryside, it may very well be that
associated environmental impacts would be minimal, or clearly of a
nature which could be mitigated through development control.
Experience has shown, however, that these types of subdivisions tend
to cluster after the approval of the initial application, to form
larger blocks of semi -rural development. Each individual plan is
produced on its own to meet established environmental criteria,
however, when clustering rather than a spacing of developments
occurs, the degree of environmental impact that the immediate area
must absorb is not only greater, but also more difficult to assess and
effectively mitigate. This is of concern to the Authority because
many of these developments have and are being proposed in areas of
coldwater streams, significant wildlife habitat and /or high water
table.
The policies we are recommending be prepared should, among other
matters, clearly distinguish between estate and rural subdivisions,
limit each with regard to number, scale and location, and direct
development into areas which meet the "area of rolling topography"
requirement of the Regional Official Plan. This should avoid most
areas of poor drainage and high water tables."
4.5 In order to address the potential noise impact of Regional Road 57,
the Regional Planning Department have requested that the applicant
provide an Acoustical Report prior to draft approval.
5. COMMENTS
5.1 The applicant submitted a Groundwater Assessment Report prepared by
Hydroterra Limited. It is the opinion of the consultant that adequate
area appears available on the lots to permit the installation of a
raised bed mantle. Furthermore, sufficient dilution of sewage
effluent should occur to maintain drinking -water standards to flow
583
`
REPORT 0O.: PD-62-89 PAGE 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ceonbiog deep aquifers and discharging along the slopes of the
Bovmnaoville Creek valley. & survey of area wells indicates that the
deep overburden and bedrock aquifers underlying the proposed
development would provide sufficient quantities of water, although the
water is expected to be very hard and to contain excessive amounts of
iron and possibly chloride, as well as variable amounts of methane
gas. Treatment of the water may therefore be required to provide
suitable supplies. The report concludes that there should not be any
noticeable impact on the quality and quantity of water available to
neighbouring wells.
A further report received June, 1988 by the Central Lake Ontario
Conservation Authority addresses their previous nouoecuo, however,
additional field work and teat drilling would have to be conducted
before any results could be considered conclusive.
5.2 As mentioned within the Rural Residential Development Information
Report, this proposed subdivision lies within an area of oouoezu.
This application proposes to increase the concentrated residential
development north of BovxnauvilIe from 134 existing estate-residential
units to 141 estate-residential units. This application would further
extend this suburban area and is contrary to Section 10.3.1.3 of the
Regional official Plan which states:
"A limited number of estate-residential subdivisions on large lots may
be permitted by amendment to this Plan. The limits to the numbers of
such estate-residential subdivisions aboII be established by their
scale and location, their financial implications for the Region and
their effect on the Region's transportation facilities and utilities."
Further residential development in this area can no longer be
considered limited.
Concentrated estate residential development such as these will:
distort municipal service priorities (i.e. parkland and schools);
likely invoke premature zegoaat for extension of municipal services
(i.e. water and/or sanitary sewer); compound environmental impacts
which are difficult to mitigate; and impede the orderly urban growth of
BovmanvilIe.
-
JO4 /�O� ...G
6.
'1' • '1 • 0
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In view of the concerns raised by the Central Lake Ontario
PAGE 6
Conservation Authority and the Town of Newcastle Fire Department and
the issues examined within the Rural Residential Development
Information Report, Staff are unable to support this application and
would respectfully recommend that the various applications by 542985
Ontario Limited for an Seven (7) lot estate residential subdivision be
DENIED.
Respectfully submitted,
^ G
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P.
Director of Planning & Development
JB *DJC *FW *jip
*Attach.
February 22, 1989
CC: 542985 Ontario Limited
c/o Bas VanAndel
429 Lakeshore Drive
P.O. Box 1642
PORT PERRY, Ontario
LOB 1NO
D.G. Biddle & Associates
96 King Street East
OSHAWA, Ontario
L1H 1B6
Mr. Sam Gust
138 Queen Street
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario
L1C 1M9
Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
eff
tive Officer
LOT 16 LOT • LOT 13
AM
m
;'..
- ■ ■■
REBECCA
y� !e
LOT 12 LOT II LOT 10
GL
MARYLE.
ANDELW000
BOWMANVILLE URBAN AREA BOUNDARY --�
.• 1000
EXISTING ESTATE RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED ESTATE RESIDENTIAL
SUBJECT SITE
� f� Est � •-
M
Z
0
W
z
0
Council Minutes - 10 - May 8, 1989
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Resolution #C- 344 -89
O.P.A., Rezoning Moved by Councillor Deegan, seconded by Councillor Hannah
& Subdivision
542985 Ontario THAT Report PD -62 -89 be lifted from the table;
Limited
THAT Report PD -62 -89 be received;
RECESS
BY -LAWS
c
THAT the Official Plan Amendment submitted by 542985 Ontrio 6 Z
Limited to permit the development of a six (6) lot estate
residential subdivision be approved;
THAT the accompanying Rezoning and Subdivision applications
approved subject to meeting all of the Region of Durham and
of Newcastle's requirements; and
THAT the Region of Durham, the applicant and the applicant
agent be so advised.
Resolution #C- 345 -89
Moved by Councillor Hannah, seconded by Councillor Hamre
t
THAT the Director of Works and the Director of Community
Services be requested to bring forth a joint report on ho
-deal -w ~th the swales and water courses we=arte acquiring in,
the course of development, uo i b ccie( .
1
"CARRIED"
Resolution #C- 346 -89
Moved by Councillor Hamre, seconded by Councillor Deegan
THAT Council recess for 10 minutes.
"CARRIED"
The meeting reconvened at 10:33 a.m.
Resolution #C- 347 -89
Moved by Councillor Stapleton, seconded by Councillor Wotten
THAT leave be granted to introduce the following by -laws, and
that the said by -laws be now read a first time:
89 -72 being a by -law to amend By -law 84 -63, the Comprehensive
Zoning By -law of the Corporation of the Town of
Newcastle (Definition of Family Dwelling Unit and
Semi - Detached Dwelling)
89 -73 being a by -law to amend By -law 84 -63, the Comprehensive
Zoning By -law of the Corporation of the Zbwn of
Newcastle (Belton Masonry)