HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-73-89DN: 3.
METING: COUNCIL
REPORT 2
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
REPORT File#
Res. #` o/
By -Law #
DATE: Monday, March 13, 1989
REPORT #: PD -73 -89 FILE #:
SUB,JECT: STATUS REPORT WITH RESPECT TO COMPLAINTS BY MR. STEWART AND
MR. NEWMAN CONCERNING MR. RYAN HELMER'S DOG AT LARGE AND
STORAGE OF DERELICT VEHICLES ON SITE
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD -73 -89 be received for information.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 At its General Purpose and Administration Committee meeting of March 6,
1989, Mr. Stewart and Mr. Newman of Stewart Road, Newtonville appeared
before the Committee indicating their family members were being harassed by
their neighbour's dogs, apparently owned by Mr. Ryan Helmer. In addition,
Mr. Stewart also advised that his sheep were killed by the dogs and that Mr.
Helmer has kept many derelict vehicles on site in contravention to the
Town's By -law.
1.2 The Committee subsequently instructed Staff to undertake all necessary
action forthwith and to report back to Council.
...2
REPORT NO.: PAGE 2
®__________®_____________®____________®_______-_ ____-- ________- _-- _____________
2. ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE TOWN
2.1 Dogs at Large
Paper work has been completed for a summon which will be served by the
Durham Police to Mr. Helmer to have Mr. Helmer's dogs destroyed. A copy
of the Animal Control Officer's report and a copy of the summons are
attached.
2.2 Storage of Derelict vehicles
The Acting By -law Enforcement Officer has ordered Mr. Helmer to remove
all derelict vehicles on site by March 18, 1989. The Acting Officer
has been instructed to lay charges forthwith if the Order to Comply is
ignored. Copy of letter is attached.
3. POLICE REPORT
At the direction of the General Purpose and Administration Committee,
Staff contacted the officer at the Durham Regional Police and was able
to obtain a copy of the police incident report (copy attached) which
indicates Mrs. Stewart was confronted by Mr. Helmer's dogs on her own
property. No charges were laid by the Police and the Animal Control
Officer was notified.
Respectfully submitted,
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P.
Director of Planning & Development
*FW*jip
*Attach.
March 8, 1989
Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
_-____ ®_- _____ -®
cLawrenc' Kotseff
Chief Administrative Officer
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
OFFICERS REPORT
IN THE MATTER OF:
OCC. NO.: I
TIME: 9 ,C) to PIA
DATE:
PA" 0, I'll t
1) J t.
i-, f't e-) r, P Tr I Ll- + in e el- t-4 r I i ci V) r)
OFFICER
, -
tl
R qllP1:PVTqAD .
T
S U -M M 0 N S' U N D, E R SECTION 2 5"0 F THE
PROVINCIAL OFFENCES ACT
PROVINCIAL in respect to an application under the Form No. 106a
OFFENCES COURT Dog Owner's Liability Act Provincial Courts Act
PROVINCE OF ONTARIO
To ....e xfi� ... oc ................................. of ......
(name of owni?)
-� ................ I ..................................
4v-b
Whereas it has been alleged before me that you are the owner ofi-&Aoguhich bit or attacked- n, namely,
X. .......... ..................... .............. I ..........
at.
... 0. <.. Q N VrI /C ..............
(location)
on or about the f3 �?.. day of ...t E: 6 U.7q P--'l 19.87
AND whereas a proceeding has been commenced in the Provincial Offences Court of the
........ of :60 )?-.N "/..• ............. for an order
requiring the dog to be destroyed in a manner to be provided in the order; or
(b) requiring the owner of the dog to take any steps that the court orders for the more
effective control of the dog;
the court being authorized to make this order by subsection 40 of the Dog Owner's Liability Act.
THEREFORE, you are commanded in Her Majesty's name to appear before the provincial offences court
at.. 1,5 2'. ...........................
on the ...../.3.:........ day of .......... . 19 at 9. Q M., at ......../ .. .............
courtroom
and to appear thereafter as required by the court in order to be dealt with according to law.
,
Issued at ..... this Li.. day of rn.OP—Cl-f 19
.......... ...... ..
Provincial Judge or Justice of the Peace
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT
You may appear personally, or by agent or counsel.
If you do not appear the trial may proceed, evidence may be taken, and an order may be made in your absence.
If you do appear,
a) the trial may proceed; or
b) you, or the applicant, may ask the court to adjourn your case to another date. The court may
grant or refuse such a request.
CO 154 (rev. 07/85)
CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
February 16, 1989.
Mr: & Mrs. -Ryan Helmer
3439 Stewart -Road
Newtonville, Ontario
IAA 1,70
Dear- sir:
40 TEMPERANCE STREET
BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO
L1 C 3A6 TELEPHONE 623 -3379
re: Operation of a Repair Garage in an A -1
Zone at 3439 Stewart Road, Concession 3,
Part Lot 6, Newtonville - File: 10.13.230
Please be advised that 'a.recent inspection of .the above noted property namely,
3439 Stewart Poad, Concession 3, Part Iot 6, Newtonville, indicated the outside
storage and repair of notor vehicles (cars) in an A Agricultural zone.
Zhis type of use is not permitted in an Agricultural Zone and is in contravention
of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle Zoning By -law #84 -63, Section 6.4.1.
You are hereby notified to _cease operation. at the above noted property within 30
days, that being March 18, 1989, so that it. will not be necessary for further
action to be taken by this office.
Yours truly,
7,Gary
Han ch, Supervisor
Plans and Examination Inspection.
GH /df
cc: Franklin Wu, Director of Planning & Development
DRP 1 REV 12/86