Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-74-89 TOWN OF NEWCASTLE REPORT File # Res. # By-Law # MEETING: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 1989 j REPORT #: WD-74-89 FILE #: SUB.ECT: MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE LANEWAYS GRACE, TREWIN AND URIADKA RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Adminstration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report WD-74-89 be received; 2. THAT the Town enter into an agreement with Mr. Arthur Trewin to provide for dedication to the Town of a 21.65 m (661) wide roadway more or less centered on the existing laneway including sufficient land at the end of the laneway to construct a turn-around circle, at no cost to the Town other than survey and legal costs, and that the Town agree to dedicate this land as a public highway; 3. THAT an agreement be entered into with Mr. Harry Grace to provide the Town to perform year-round maintenance of his laneway until such time as the property changes hands, after which time the Town will no longer carry-out any maintenance of the laneway and that this agreement be registered on title; 4. THAT $14,000 be provided in the 1990 Budget to cover survey and legal costs and the upgrading of the Trewin and Grace laneways to acceptable standards for year round maintenance; and I I I i 03 . . .2 REPORT NO.: WD-74-89 PAGE 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. THAT a copy of this report be sent to Mr. Arthur Trewin, Mr. Harry Grace and Mr. Mecola Uriadka. REPORT 1.0 ATTACHMENTS No.l: Report WD-45-88 dated September 6, 1988 No.2: Drawing showing the location of the Trewin laneway and the road allowance between Lots 14 and 15, Concession 8. N0.3: Drawing showing the location of the Grace laneway and the unopened road allowance between Lots 32 and 33, Concession 10. No.4: Drawing showing the location of the Uriadka laneway and the unopened road allowance between Lots 28 and 29, Concession 10. No.5: Letter from Mr. A. Trewin No.6: Letter from Mr. H. Grace 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 On September 6, 1988, Report WD-45-88 was adopted by the General Purpose and Administration Committee and subsequently approved by Council on September 23, 1988 (See Attachment No.1) . 2.2 On October 31, 1988, Mr. Trewin and others appeared as a delegation before the General Purpose and Administration Committee and testified to the claim that several years ago, an unwritten agreement was made between Mr. Trewin and the Darlington Township Council that the Township would provide year round maintenance to the Trewin laneway rather than make extensive repairs to the road between Concessions 7 and 8, northerly to the Trewin farmhouse. (See Attachment No.2) REPORT NO. : WD-74-89 PAGE 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.3 Claims have been made in the past that the same type of unwritten agreement was made by the Darlington Tbwnship Council for the maintenance of the Grace and Uriadka laneways. (See Attachments 3 and 4) 3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT 3.1 1 have advised Mr. Trewin, Mr. Grace and Mr. Laskowsky, who is Mr. Uriadka's solicitor, that in order to solve this problem, I am prepared to recommend either of the following two alternatives to Council: 1) By agreement between the Town and the property owner, registered on title, the Town provide year round maintenance to the laneways, until such time as the property changes hands. 2) The property owner dedicate to the Town, for the sum of two (2) dollars, a strip of land sixty-six feet in width, centered more or less on the laneway, and sufficient land at the end of the laneway to provide for a turn-around circle, and that this land be dedicated by the Town as a public highway. 3.2 Mr. Trewin has chosen Alternative 1 and Mr. Grace has chosen Alternative 2. (Attachment No.'s 5 and 6) 3.3 Several attempts have been made to obtain an answer from Mr. Uriadka as to which of the two options he would prefer with no success. Rather than hold up this report any longer, it has been decided to proceed with the report at this time and deal with Mr. Uriadka's laneway at a later time. 040 .. .4 REPORT NO.: WD-74-89 PAGE 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4.0 COST 4.1 The estimated cost to the Town for survey and cost.and upgrading the Trewin and Grace laneways in $14,000. 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 The following recommendations are made based on the above: 1. THAT the Town enter into an agreement with Mr. Arthur Trewin to provide for dedication to the Town of a 21.65 m (661) wide roadway more or less centered on the existing laneway including sufficient land at the end of the laneway to construct a turn-around circle, at no cost to the Town other than survey and legal costs, and that the Town agree to dedicate this land as a public highway. 2. THAT an agreement be entered into with Mr. Harry Grace to provide that the Town perform year-round maintenance of his laneway until such time as the property changes hands, after which time the Town will no longer carry-out any maintenance of the laneway and that this agreement be registered on title. Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee, Walter A. Evans, P. Eng. , Lawrence E' Kotseff, /I Director of Public Works. Chief Admi 4strative officer. WAE*llv April 12, 1989 Attachments cc: Mr. Harry Grace Mr. Mecola Uriadka R.R. #2 c/o Mr. Anthony E. Laskoswky Blackstock, Ontario Barrister, Solicitor, Notary LlC 3K2 P.O. Box 772 Oshawa, Ontario Mr. A. Trewin LlH 7D49 R.R. #1 Bowmanville, Ontario LlC 3K2 nA 1 i OF NEWCASTLE REPORT File # jr�'=f/� `'� ♦ . , .. . . .. Res. # By-Law # MEETING: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION MEETING (ATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 REPORT #: WD-45-88 FILE #: SLEECT: MAINTENANCE OF LANSWAYS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration .Committee recommend to Council the following; 1. THAT this report be received; and ~2. :THAT' the' decision made by Council on November .28, 1983 that the Town will discontinue ,carrying. out maintenance on the Worboy (now Uriadka) , Grace and`.Trewin laneways be confirmed; and 3 THAT a copy of-:this, report be forwarded to: 1• ...'Mr.tAnthony E. Laskowsky 'Barrister, Solicitor, Notary P.O. Box 772 Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7M9 2. Mr. A. Trewin R.R. #1 Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3K2 3. Mr. H. Grace j R.R. #2 Blackstock, Ontario LOB lBO ATTACK 1Ei�f T WO= 1 1042 W-74-39 . . .2 i Page 2 WD-45-88 1 REPORT 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 At the meeting of Council held on February 8, 1988, Resolution #C-96-88 was passed as follows: "THAT the correspondence dated January 19, 1988, from Anthony E. Laskowsky, Barrister, Solicitor, Notary, P.O. Box 772, Oshawa, L1H 7M9 requesting that the road allowance on the easterly limit of lands owned by Uriadka in Part of Lots 29 and 30, Concession 9, Darlington, be maintained by the Town be received and referred to the Director of Public Works for review and subsequent report." 1.2 The letters from Mr. Laskowsky are attached {Attachment No.l(a) & 1(b) }. J 2.0 COMMENTS 2.1 At the regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on November 21, 1983, Resolution #GPA-931-83 was passed as follows: "THAT the recommendations in Report WD-98-83 be endorsed; and 1. THAT this report be received; and 2. Pending receipt of written confirmation of their agreement with same, Council agree to have the Works Department continue to provide winter maintenance on the following roadways on private property until, and including, the winter of 1984-85; i) Mr. R. Worboy, Part Lot 30, Conc. 9, Darlington" ii) Mr. A. Trewin, Lot 15, Conc. 8, Darlington iii) Mr. H. Grace, Part Lots 33 & 34, Conc. 9, Darlington By Resolution #C-886-83 the resolution passed by the General Purpose and Administration Committee was approved by Council. 2.2 A copy of report WD-98-83 is attached to this report (Attachment N0.2) . 11 043 . . .3 Page 3 WD-45-88 J i 2.3 The location of the Worboy (now Uriadka , the Trewin and the Grace laneways are illustrated on Attachments 3, 4 and 5. 3.0 PROBLEM 3.1 The problem is that for some reason the Town has discontinued maintenance on the laneway owned by Mr. Worboy (now Uriadka) but has continued to carry out maintenance on the Trewin and Grace laneways. 4.0 COMMENTS 4.1 On October 20, 1983, Mr. Dupuis wrote to Mr. Worboy suggesting that the Town maintain the laneway up to and including the winter of 1984/85 (Attachment No.6) . On October 28th, 1983, Mr. Worboy wrote to Mr. Dupuis agreeing to this arrangement (Attachment No.7) . l 4.2 On November 5, x.985, Mr. David Gray, Deputy Director of Public Works, J wrote to Mr. Grace and Mr. Trewin advising them that the Town would maintain their •laneways for the 1985/86 season (Attachment No.'s 8 & 9) . 4.3 Prior to writing to Council on this matter, Mr. Laskowsky had discussed this matter with staff of the Public Works Department. The matter was referred to Mr. David Sims, Town Solictor, who provided a written opinion on the matter on January 18, 1988. (Attachment No.10) . Mr. Sims advises that the Town is not obligated to maintain the laneway and states that "the question of whether or not the plowing ought to continue is purely a political, as opposed to legal question" . 5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECC%IMENDATION 5.1 A review of the correspondence and of the legal opinion received from Mr. David Sims, leads to the conclusion that the Town is not liable to maintain the Uriadka, Trewin and Grace laneways. It is, therefore, recommended that the decision made by Council on November 28, 1983 to discontinue maintenance on the Uriadka (formerly Worboy) , Grace and Trewin laneways be confirmed and that a copy of this report be forwarded to Mr. A.E. Laskowsky, Mr. A. Trewin and Mr. H. Grace. i . i . i Page 4 Report WD-45-88 i Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee, r Walter A. Evans, P. Eng. , Lawrence E K tseff, Director of Public Works. chief Adminis rative officer. ;llv August 9, 1988 I 1045 I REGIONAL RD. 'j 20 " IL n n TREWIN u LANEWAY n i y I to Y UNOPENED a o F5 ROAD z °i W ALLOWANCE w N Q C� II I CONCESSION RD. 8 F- ATTACHIMEJ NO, 2 � WD-74-h9 1046 CONCESSION RD. IO n n n I� u n 'I GRACE u (� ,,,�LANE WAY a u II it .I u �I �I u I I' l u u 4 II' UNOPENED ROAD ALLOWANCE 0 J W_ Z W i i I i C ATTACKIEff NO, 3 j � ENFIELD CONCESSION RD. 9 Milli i i BOUNDARY RD. CPR i 4 0 CONCESSION RD. 10 ci 0 J W LL. -w--�NOPENED Z ROAD W URIADKA LANEWAY ALLOWANCE i i ATTACKIE[IfF NO, 4 1048 W-74-89