The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPSD-046-05 " , . C/JJl-!lJglon REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 Report #: PSD-046-05 File #: PLN 34.2.12, PLN. 34.5.2.69 and PLN. 34.5.2.70 f<'-t'~ fJ {];;7;/ ;:S4-rYC By-law #: Subject: PROPOSED HERITAGE DESIGNATIONS OF JOHN COLE HOUSE AND ALBERT WASHINGTON HOUSE RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-046.05 be received; 2. THAT in lieu of the heritage conservation easement as per Resolution GPA-452-03 that heritage designation of the exterior of these buildings be accepted as an alternative for the long term care and maintenance of the buildings; 3. THAT the request of the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee to designate John Cole House, 4675 Bethesda Road and the Washington House, 6585 Regional Road 34 (Enfield Road) as historical structures, be approved; 4. THAT the Clerk prepare the required notices of intent pursuant to the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act and report back to Council following the prescribed notification period; and 5. THAT the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee and the interested parties listed in this report be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: o ,( l'C.....~. -.J. <:-> Reviewed by: ~ ~ '^' Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer ILlFLldf 18 March 2005 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623.3379 F (905)623.0830 698 REPORT NO.: PSD.046-05 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 On December 8, 2003, Planning Services Report PDS-148-03 was presented to the General Purpose and Administration Committee. A copy of the report is included as Attachment 1. During the following meeting of December 15, 2003, Council approved recommendation #GPA-452-03 which included a grant in lieu of the municipal development charges in exchange for the owner entering into a conservation easement over the exterior fayade of the heritage homes. 1.2 Since the approval of the recommendations in Report PSD-148-03 two heritage houses which were on lands owned by the Ministry of Transportation have been acquired and moved to new locations. The Albert Washington house was located at 5541 Washington Road, Lot 27, Concession 5, former Township of Darlington. In February of 2004 it was relocated to 6585 Regional Road 34, Part Lot 30, Concession 6, Former Township of Darlington. The John Cole house was located at 5690 Acres Road, Part Lot 5, Concession 5, former Township of Darlington. In October of 2004 it was relocated to 4675 Bethesda Road, Part Lot 6, Concession 4, former Township of Darlington. The owners of these buildings have completed their grant application forms and are now requesting a refund of the municipal development charge which they paid at the time of building permit issuance. 1.3 At the time of the writing of PSD-148-03 it was unclear whether the buildings in their new locations would be eligible to be designated as heritage buildings. In addition, it was felt that a heritage conservation easement would be a better tool for ensuring the long term protection and maintenance of the building. Sample agreements were subsequently received from Ontario Heritage Foundation. 1.4 Upon further review with the owners and representatives of LACAC it became clear that heritage designation of the homes was desired by both parties. In addition, the sample conservation easement agreements addressed interiors, landscape features and other areas beyond what the Municipality is looking to protect. The Municipal interests in long term care, maintenance and the owners interest in being able to make changes to the designated building can be addressed by the process that LACAC has in place for designated buildings. The caveat that will be added to these designation Bylaws is that the designation will not be removed at the request of the this or any subsequent owner without due consideration of the municipal investment that has been made towards the building. 2.0 HERITAGE DESIGNATION REQUESTS The Planning Services Department has received requests from the property owners of 6585 Regional Road 34 and 4675 Bethesda Road to designate their buildings as having historic and/or architectural value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. Both houses have been identified in the Clarington inventory of heritage resources as Secondary buildings and their inventory numbers are H121 and H112, respectively. The cultural heritage descriptions of these properties are included as Attachment 2 for 6585 Regional Road 34, and Attachment 3 for 4675 Bethesda Road. The Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee (LACAC) reviewed these requests at their March 15, 2005, meeting and are in support. o~ the ~e9i9n~tions. REPORT NO.: PSD-046.05 PAGE 3 The Ontario Heritage Act empowers a municipality to pass a by-law designating a structure to be of historic and/or architectural value or interest. The Act stipulates that the owner of a structure so designated cannot alter the structure where such alteration is likely to affect the reasons for designation without the written consent of Council. Council is required to consider any application for alteration of a designated property in consultation with the LACAC. Both of these buildings were on properties owned by the Ministry of Transportation and both were slated for demolition if they could not be moved off the sites. Although it is always preferable to preserve heritage homes in their original location, it is better to move them to another property than have them demolished. The owners of these buildings have incurred considerable expense to preserve the structures by having them moved. The designation of the buildings on their new locations will ensure that the buildings will continue to be preserved. The Ministry of Culture has confirmed that the buildings would qualify for designation under the Ontario Heritage Act at their new locations. The LACAC and staff support the designation of the structures under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, as having historic and/or architectural significance. 3.0 CONCLUSIONS It is recommended that the Municipality accept heritage designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act as meeting the same requirements as conservation easements for these two properties. It is also recommended that the Clerk prepare, send and publish the required notices of intent to designate 6585 Regional Road 34, and 4675 Bethesda Road, pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and report back to Council following the prescribed notification period. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Report PSD-148-03 Attachment 2 - Description for designation of 6585 Regional Road 34 Attachment 3 - Description for designation of 4675 Bethesda Road Interested parties to be notified of Council's and Committee's decision: Victor Suppan Jennifer Knox Jim Coombes 6-9 9 {) 0 1 ATTACHMENT 1 Clm:#!glOn REPORT PLANNING SERVICES Meeting: Date: Report #: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE . , Monday, December 8, 2003 \ PSD-148-03 File #: PLN 34.15.2 By-law #: Subject: GRANT IN LIEU OF DEVELOPMENT CHARGES CONSERVATION OF HERITAGE HOMES RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD-148-03 be received; 2. THAT Grants in lieu of the municipal portion of development charges for Heritage Homes that are being removed from the lands owned by the Province be provided on an interim basis for the next 18 months to be financed from the working Funds ReserJe Account 2900-1-X; 3. THAT the Grants only be in place until the review and passage of the Development Charges By- law at which time, specific types of developmEnt can be exempted as part of the By-law. if deemed appropriate; 4. THAT the Municipality be granted a conservation easement over the exterior fa~de of the Heritage Homes receiving such grants; 5. THAT the Region of Durham be requested to either a) review the Development Charges By-law to consider an exemption for the relocation of Heritage Homes affected by the 407 b) or provide a grant in an equivalent amount to the Regional Development Charge applicable; and 6. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: Nancy a or Director 0 Finance NT/FL*DJC.sh December 2, 2003 Reviewed by: /' 'J ILa~_tLQ~ ~\4. ~nklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Submitted by: CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET. BOWMANVILLE. ONTARIO L 1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830 69910 '699002 . . REPORT NO.: PSD-148"()3 PAGE 2 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 In preparation for the construction of Highway 407, the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) has purchased a number of properties in the alignment area of the previously preferred route. Regardless of whether the Highway will or will not require these properties they are now owned by MTO. MTO is currently accepting bids for the removal of these heritage homes. Previously MTO's practice was demolish the homes they had purchased; however, members of the Clarington community intervened with respect to heritage homes and have worked with MTO to revise their policy. Of the MTO owned heritage homes in Clarington, four are fieldstone and one is brick, all are listed in the municipality's inventory of heritage resources. Three fieldstone houses are on the secondary list (5541 Washington Road, 5690 Acres Road, 5681 Acres Road); their inventory numbers are H121, H112 and H111 respectively. A fourth fieldstone house is on the Primary List and is located at 5531 Bethesda Road; its inventory number is H043. The" brick home at 5415 Solina Road is designated under the Ontario Heritage Act and through By-Law 89-187; MTO intends to tenant this property in order to protect it from vandalism. The structures are advertised on the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO) website as being available to be moved. 2.0 HERITAGE CONSERVATION 2.1 At the October 2003 meeting of LACAC a resolution stating: 'THA T Council amend the De\'elopment Charges By-law to exempt the municipal development charge ill regards to Clarington heritage buildings that are to be relocated; subject to the owner entering into a heritage conservation agreement." In addition, the Chair of LACAC has submitted a letter to the Director of Planning Services (attachment 2) highlighting the intent of the committee. To ensure future protection of these homes in their new location it is advisable to obtain a heritage conservation agreement for the exterior fac;:ade of the home. Such an agreement will not limit the owners with regard to either renovating or restoring the interior; however, a conservation agreement rather than designation is a better tool to ensure the long term interests of the municipality for the protection and maintenance of the exterior of the building and against future demolition. Samples of conservation agreement (easements) have been requested from the Ontario Heritage Foundation. They have employed this type of legal agreements to protect specific features. The agreement is registered on title of the property. 3.0 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES 3.1 Clarington's Development Charges By-law does not provide for any exemptions for these circumstances. During the next review of the bylaw specific exemptions may be 6990U3 . . REPORT NO.: PSD-148"()3 PAGE 3 examined. The schedule for review of the bylaw will begin in the summer of 2004 and be completed by August 2005. As an interim measure, until the Development Charges Bylaw is reviewed in its entirety, staff are proposing a grant in lieu of the municipal portion of development charges. This interim measure will meet the timeframe of MTO and the purchasers, as relocation of at least two of the structures is scheduled for this winter; further, it facilitates the expedient moving of the homes (before further vandalism occurs, and while the ground is frozen). The maximum exposure for the Municipality is approximately $38,435 ($7687 x5); should all five homes be relocated within the next 18 months. 4.0 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGES 4.1 The Region of Durham Finance Department has been contacted to determine whether there is any exemption under their new Development Charges By-law. Unfortunately, no exemption was contemplated in their recent review and therefore no exemption is currently available. It is recommended that Clarington Council request the Regional Council review the issue of either amending their by-law to incorporate an exemption, or provide a grant in the amount equivalent to the applicable Regional Development charge; in order to conserve homes with heritage or architectural significance that are in threat of demolition. 5.0 CONCLUSION 5.1 Four of the homes purchased by MTO are historically andlor architecturally significant and would, in their original setting warrant heritage designation; the fifth home is dezignated. To encourage the relocation, of all the homes rather than demolition; staff is recommending an incentive in the form of a grant in lieu of the municipal portion of the development charges as an appropriate interim measure until the new development charges bylaw is formulated. The exposure of the Municipality over the next 18 months would be $38,435 for the five heritage homes. At this point only two of the homes have been purchased and are being relocated; one will be tenanted in it's current location. During the review of the Development Charges Bylaw a further examination of potential exemptions will be undertaken and the Bylaw written accordingly. Attachments: Attachment 1 - ACO listing of the four homes Attachment 2 - Letter from LACAC 699004 : ACO IIALP ATTACHMENT 1 November 2001 INominator: IPenny Young, Ontario Ministry of Transportation IName/Info: Ilpicture: 1855, one-and-a-half storey Neoclassical farmhouse. E. Pascoe House, , Newcastle IFeatures: It is a 3 bay fieidslone conslruclion fealuring lhe original Venetian windows, stone window sills and fronl entranceway. A line of small stones around the house above first floor windows may indicate the presence of a veranda at one time. Iconservation Work: IThe east fac;ade has been stuccoed probably due to exposure damage. There is a new loutside chimney. Under-eave moulding and bargeboard are intact. IBuilding Address~.. 5541 Washington Road on lhe east side south of Concession Road 6. Localed easl of Cily of Oshawa and just west and south of hamlet of Solina, town of Newcaslie, Regional Municipality of Durham. ISuggested Uses: I IResidence I IHeritage Status: I Listed under Part IV of the Onlario Heritage Act. Town of Newcastle Heritage Properties secondary status. IInquiries: For more information contact Penny Young, Regional Archaeologist at 416- 235-5541 Architectural Conservancy of Ontario Suite 204, 10 Adelaide St. East, Toronto M5C 1J3 Tel: (416) 367-8075 Fax: (416) 367-8630 Email: <lcQ@On.aipn.com IASking Price: I lother Info: email: Penny.Young@mlo.gov.on.ca 416-235-5541 Fax: 416-235-4940 6990U5 1- ...... . I f.. _. _.. t..:_~ ................. J ^ r'r'l f1........1....1D...............n./~ ......1""'" 'ht.,....., 171?17003 . ACO HALP December 2001 INominator: Penny Young, Ontario Ministry of Transportation IName/lnfo: IIPicture: 1855, one and one half storey Neoclassical farmhouse John Cole House 5690 Acres Rd., Town of C1arington, RM of Durham IFeatures: It is a 3 bay fieldstone construction featuring lhe original Venetian windows, slone windowsills and front entranceway. Iconservation Work: --.J A lwo storey addilion has been added to lhe back of the house (west side) and a new enclosed porch to the front of the house. IBUilding location: I 'West side of Acres Road south of Concession Road 6 (Con 5, Lot 5 former TownShip of I Darlington). Just easl and south of hamlet of Tyrone UIM co-ordinates are: 685500E, 4873450N Isuggested Uses' , IResidence I IHeritage Status: I INot deslgnaled I IInquiries: ! pen I'!y...yg u I'! 9 @mto.Qov.on.ca 416-235-5541 Architectural Conservancy of Ontario Fax: 416-235-4940 Suile 204, 10 Adelaide 51. Easl, Toronto M5C 1J3 Ministry of Transportation Tel: (416) 367'8075 Planning and Environmental Office Fax: (416) 367-8630 3rd Floor, Building D Email: aco@on.aibn.com 1201 Wilson Avenue Downsview, ON M3M U8 , IASking Price: I I I lother Info: I I I 6990GG ,. '-"I'l.M 1 f~_l_l~u..J_.. ,~...__ 1') n n()(), . . 'ACO HALP August 2003 INominator: IPenny Young, Ontario Ministry of Transportation IName/Info: IIPicture: Cole Farm House 5681 Acres Rd., Town of Clarington, RM of Durham One and one half storey Neoclassical farmhouse I!:eatures: J [Ii: is a 3 bay fieldstone construction featuring stone windowsills and front entranceway. l Iconservation Work: I A restored front entranceway, restored 6over6 windows, rear porch added, 3 front dormers added, rear wing sided and windows reslored. IBUilding Location: Easl side of Acres Road south of Concession Road 6 (Con 4, Lot 5 former Township of Darlington). JUst easl and south of hamlel of Tyrone Isuggested Uses: I IResidence l IHeritage Status: I Town of Newcastle Herilage Properlies Primary slatus IInquiries: I Pen ny. YOYng@mto.gov.on.ca 416-235-5541 Fax: 416-235-3446 Ministry of Transportation Planning and Environmental Office 3rd Floor, Building D 1201 Wilson Avenue Downsview, ON M3M 1J8 IASking Price: I lother Info: Proposals are to be submitted and prospective owners must cover complete cost of moving the structure off-site. Architectural Conservancy of Ontario 5uile 204, 10 Adelaide 51. East, Toronlo M5C 1]3 Tel: (416) 367'8075 Fax: (416) 367-8630 Email: aco@on.aibn.com Email: aC_Q.@on._ailm.co!TI 699007 , . '" r'I^"_ _I If'. _1_(lI.....'H:___/~_..1~... l......... nnnnn, 'ACO HALP August 2003 INominator: ICharlton Carscallen, Ontario Ministry of Transportation IName/Info: Ilpicture: One and one half storey Neoclassical farmhouse Werry House 5531 Bethesda Rd., Town of Clarington, RM of Durham IFeatures: loriglnal eave returns and barge board. Original brick cornices and door Iinlels. Iconservation Work: One storey field stone side wing not original but constructed to match very closely the original house. IBUilding Location: I East side of Bethesda Road, south of Concession Road 6, Lot 6 Con. 5 ISuggested Uses: I jResidence ~ IHeritage Status: I Heritage Buildings, Darlinglon Township ~ries: I ~ha rlj:on.Ca rscallel1@mto,Qov ,on~cJl. 416-235-5489 Fax: 416-235-3446 Architectural Conservancy of Ontario Suite 204, 10 Adelaide St. Easl, Toronlo M5C 1J3 Tel: (416) 367-8075 Fax: (416) 367-8630 Email: aco@on.aibn.com Ministry of Transportation Planning and Environmental Office 3rd Floor, Building D 1201 Wilson Avenue Downsview, ON M3M 1J8 IASking Price: I IOther Info: Proposals are to be submitted and prospective owners must cover complete cost of moving the structure off-site. Email: aCc:.-@Qn.ailm.com ACO @ 2003 6990G8 l' _ ~__u/""""^I1._1_f\1,~~,I;....rl.......,h-t.......... 12/2/2003 ATTACHMENT 2 November 24, 2003 Mr. David Crome Director of Planning Services Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Streel Bowmanville, Ontario LlC3A6 Dear Mr. Crome: RE: Development Charges for Relocated Heritage Buildings Al the Oclober 21 ,t meeting of the LACAC the committee discussed the fale of threatened herilage buildings localed lhrough-out lhe municipality. This discussion was prompted by the MTO purchases of four heritage properties that have been recorded by lhe M).micipalilyas herilage resource buildings. The buildings were acquired by MTO as poteniially they are within lhe route of the proposed Highway 407. All are currently vacanl and as such have been vandalized. The Minislry's practice has been to demolish buildings that they have purchased. However, lhese four lhey have offered as available to be moved. These are not the only heritage buildings that are lhreatened with demolilion. There are heritage structures throughout Clarington located on lands that are designaled for industrial or commercial use that may be demolished to make room for new development. Moving any of lhese buildings can be very cost prohibitive depending on Ihe number of factors involved, such as taking down hydro lines, traversing bridges, or crossing railway lracks. There is also the expense of meeting the requirements to obtain a building permit and development charges to place the house on another lot. The LACAC's underslanding is thaI the Municipalily would apply lhe development charge 10 moving any ofthese herilage homes 10 lots that can accommodate them. It is also the LACAC's understanding lhat lhe intent of the 101 developmenl charge is to accommodate lhe need to provide services for an increase in residential development. Our reasoning is lhat ifthe house is laken from one lot and lransferred 10 anolher lot there is no increase in residential use and lhe lot developmenl charge should not be applicable. If, as in lhe case of the 407 properties, lhe highway does not go through and lhe lot is sold for residenlial use, anyone building on Ihe property would be introducing a new residenlial use and would have to pay the appropriale fee. 699009 To this effect, the LACAC passed motion number 03-69 during their October 21, 2003, meeting which states the following: · THAT Council amend lhe Development Charges By-law to exempt the municipal development charge in regard to Clarington heritage buildings lhal are to be relocated; subjecl to the owner entering inlo a heritage conservalion agreement. The molion includes a reference to the owner enlering into a herilage conservation agreement to ensure that the heritage integrity oflhe home's facade is maintained after it is moved to its new location. The agreement can be in the form of a herilage easement or any olher legal document that lhe Municipality deems appropriate to serve lhis purpose. The LACAC has been informed that the houses in the route of the 407 are to be moved, or possibly demolished, within the near future. We have also been informed thaI the Municipality's Lot Developmenl Charges By-law will not be reviewed until 2004/5. The LACAC is concerned that the houses being offered for sale by the 407 are in an urgent threat areas and would like the Municipality to consider a means to provide assistance to lhe new owners of these buildings prior to the review of the Lot Developmenl Charges By-law. During the review of the Development Charges By-Law we would recommend that an exemption be provided for heritage homes Ihat are being relocated regardless of whether they are related to the 407 or other development work. Thank you. Yours lruly, \.J (". (- .~ ' I L~' Mavis Carlton LACAC Chair cc: Faye Langmaid Isabel Little 699010 The Anthony Washington House 6585 Regional Road 34, Part Lot 30, Concession 6, Darlington Attachment 2 This fieldstone farmhouse was constructed in the NeoClassical style for Anthony Washington and his wife, Elizabeth Annis. The house was originally located on a large farm lot at 5541 Washington Road which Anthony Washington acquired in 1834. In 1882 Thomas and Margaret Pascoe purchased the property. In 1890 the Pascoe farm was awarded the silver medal for the best producing farm in Durham County. Lewis Pascoe inherited the property from his father Thomas and carried on farming with his wife Emma Jane. In 1892 ownership was transferred to Isaac Hardy, who was also an expert farmer. The property became known as "Hardivue" after Isaac switched from beef cattle to purebred Holsteins. It remained in the Hardy ownership until Isaac retired in 1937. The Ministry of Transportation is the current owner of 5541 Washington Road and the fieldstone farmhouse was moved to 6585 Regional Road 34 in 2004 to save it from demolition. This one and one half storey house was built in the 1850s. It is three bays wide and three bays long and still retains its raised german white pointing in the south fac;:ade above the old porch line. The south fac;:ade's granite stone is white, pink, and black random colour Ashlar with a square faced cut laid in a course uneven pattern. The east and west fac;:ades' granite stone is square faced and laid in a coursed uneven pattem. The north fac;:ade is faced with rubble with no coursing. It has also been covered with concrete and a white top coat of stucco. This stone farmhouse is recommended for designation at its new location under the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage significance and the following exterior architectural features: Exterior: . The Ashlar granite stone of the south facade . The east and west fac;:ades' square faced granite . The north fac;:ade's random rubble · The main entrance rectangular transom and sidelights View of Anthony Washington House from Regional Road 34 699Gl1 South and east facades West and south facades East and north facades 699012 Lot 32 iJl [ill] I ~ m ~ .. w ~ ~ ~ ~ Lot 31 I ~ ONC~"ON ,t) I Lot 30 ~ fulJ m N w ;::: - - Lot 29 lL ~ m ~ m ~ w ~ ~ w ~ .. ~ 6904 6840 6839 6BOO 6758 6683 6622 6582 6545 6534- 6513 CD 6492 C ~ 0 .- en 6400 I en G) u c ~ 6358 0 634 6325 0 6318 6272 ,--- 6228 618e 6171 6160 6144 ~ ~ ~ 0 N .. W ~ ~ :il ~ ~ ~ 60C - , I ~ , ~ ~h ;;; II ~ I m ~ ~ ~ ~ " II t Subject Site. H121 6585 Regional Road 34, Darlington 699013 The John Cole House Attachment 3 4675 Bethesda Road, Part Lot 5, Concession 5, Darlington This fieldstone three bay by two bay farmhouse was constructed for the Cole family in approximately 1855. It is one of three similar stone houses that were located along Acres Road. The house sat on a 100 acre lot on 5690 Acres Road which had been owned by James Bates. James bequeathed the property to his wife Elizabeth and their children on July 19th, 1832. Charles Bates, possibly the son of James and Elizabeth, became the owner of the lands by 1845. Charlesville, which is now called Haydon, was called such in honour of Charles Bates as he built a mill there that encouraged settlement. Charles Bates sold the property to Roger Cole, who is reputed to have donated the funds to build an Anglican Church in Bowmanville. When Roger died in 1861 his son John Cole became the owner. In 1886 John willed the property to his son John RR Cole. The property remained in the Cole family until 1962. The Ministry of Transportation is the current owner of 5690 Acres Road and the fieldstone farmhouse house was moved to 4675 Bethesda Road in 2004 to save it from demolition. The front and north side of the farmhouse was constructed of Ashlar cut stone, hammered into square and rectangle styles and set in a broken range. The stones range in colour from black to white to pink. The south wall is rubble hammered into a faced stone set in a random coarse pattem. The east wall is split rubble set in a random pattern. An enclosed frame porch covers approximately 30% of the front far;ade. Approximately 60% of the east wall is covered by a frame addition and there is also evidence of previous addition. The farmhouse is recommended for designation at its new location under the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage significance and the following exterior architectural features: Exterior: . The Ashlar cut stone of the north and west facades . The south facade's hammered rubble · The east far;ade's random split rubble Front fayade facing Bethesda Road 699(;14 South and east facades North and east facades , Lot 8 Lot 7 Lot 6 Lot 5 n ~ 00 ItfuJ JL ~ ~ " ctJ ~ m ; ~ " ~ m m ~ " ~ " m " " 4601 "lit " ~ c ~ ~ 4537 ~ ~ 0 " " " , .- 44.38 ;;; en 4414 ~ en " CJ) t) C 4353 0 ~ U 0 ~ ~ " 0 ~ . " z 4 0 ~ ~ " m " " N " 0 " ~ " ~ ~ ~ m " " " " . I '110". 4120 ELINE) 4100 (PIPELINE) o " ~ ~ ~ ~ " " II t ~~I ~ ~ ~ ~ c-. ~ Subject Site - H112 4675 Bethesda Road, Darlington 69SJ1:l