Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-21-90 Addendum 4 UNFINISHED TOWN OF NEWCASTLE BUSINESS u kt; REPORT File #�v . 7 , ro Res. # By-Law # _ SING:GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE DATE: APRIL 23, 1990 REPORT #WD-21-90 ADDENDUM FILE #: SUB,JECT:miLL STREET AND MILL STREET BRIDGE - HAMPTON RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report WD-21-90 Addendum be received; 2. THAT Report WD-21-90 be approved; and 3. THAT Council approve the by-law attached to Report WD-21-90 Addendum. ------------------------------------------------------------ REPORT 1.0 ATTACHMENTS No. l: Report WD-21-90 No.2: Information Centre Register No. 3: By-Law to Amend By-Law 75-23 No.4: Correspondence from Mr. Laverne Clemens No.5: Correspondence dated April 4, 1990 from Mr. Raymond Farrow 101 . . .2 REPORT NO. : WD-21-90 ADDENDUM PAGE 2 2.0 BACKGROUND 2 . 1 On Friday, March 9, 1990, the General Purpose and Administration Committee passed Resolution #GPA-170-90: "THAT the Mill Street footbridge project be tabled until such time as another public information meeting has been held, and that a subsequent report be forwarded to the General Purpose and Administration Committee. " 3.0 REVIEW AND COMMENT 3. 1 An Information Centre was held from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Hampton Community Hall at which time displays were available to explain the 5 alternatives for Mill Street and the Mill Street Bridge which were outlined in Report WD-21-90 . Register sheets (see Attachment No.2) were available and the residents were asked to indicate on the register sheets the alternative which they preferred. 3.2 The number of signatures on the register sheets for the five options were as follows: Signatures Alternative 1: Footbridge only 23 Alternative 2, 3 and 4 0 Alternative 5: Construction of the previously designed 96 box culvert, inlet structure and spillway, located on the future two lane roadway alignment north of the existing crossing, together with 130 m± of single lane, rural cross-section roadway to connect the approaches . This alternative also includes widening the west approach embankment to the north to accommodate a pedestrian walkway at the top of the existing embankment grade. . . .3 11 202 REPORT NO. : WD-21-90 ADDENDUM PAGE 3 3.1 Four-Way Stop at the Mill Street/McCallum Street/Ring Street Intersection There are three houses at this intersection which are very close to the streetline thereby creating poor visibility for vehicular traffic. Several residents voiced their concern about this and they were advised that Council will be asked to pass a by-law (see Attachment No3) to provide for a "Four-Way Stop" at the intersection. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 . 1 Based on the results of the Information Centre it can be concluded that the majority of the residents prefer Alternative No. 5. It is, therefore, recommended that Report WD-21-90 (Attachment No. l) be lifted from the table and approved and that Council approve a by-law to provide for a Four-Way Stop at the Mill Street/King Street/McCallum Street intersection. Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee, ----------------------.- P---- � --------- r--------- Walter A. Evans, P.Eng , Lawrence, . Kotseff, Director of Public Works Chief A nistrative Officer WAE*llv April 5, 1990 Attachments 12 05 " y . TOWN OF NEWCASTLE REPORT File # Res # By-Law # hTf (ING: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION MEETING MARCH 9 , 1990 fz� N: WD-21-90 FILE ##: SUIUCT: MILL STREET AND MILL STREET BRIDGE — HAMPTON RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1 . THAT Report WD-21-90 be received; 2 . THAT the Director of Public Works be authorized to proceed with the construction in 1990 of the Mill Street Bridge and the widening of Mill Street, in accordance with Alternative 5, as outlined in Report WD-21-90 and summarized as follows : a) Concrete box culvert, inlet structure and spillway, located on the future two lane roadway alignment north of the existing crossing of Bowmanville Creek. b) 130 m+ of single lane, rural cross-section roadway to connect the approaches . c) Widening of the west approach embankment to the north to accommodate a pedestrian walkway at the top of the existing embankment grade; . . . 2 ATTACIT"IENT 'N0 .1 WD-21-00 ADDENDUM REPORT NO. : WD-21-90 PAGE 2 3 . THAT Item 4 : MILL STREET FOOTBRIDGE (HAMPTON) of the proposed 1990 Capital Budget be amended to read as follows : 4 . MILL STREET BRIDGE AND ROADWAY (HAMPTON) Gross Expenditure $375 , 000 Account Name : Road Capital Reserve $ 75 , 000 Lot Levies $300 , 000 4 . THAT Mr. Ken Fitzgerald, Ms . Yvonne Lindeburg and the other residents of Hampton be advised of Council 's decision. ---------------------------------------- REPORT 1 . 0 ATTACHMENT No. l : Report dated February 22, 1990, from Totten Sims Hubicki Associates . 2 . 0 BACKGROUND 2 . 1 Mr. Ken Fitzgerald appeared as a delegation at a meeting of Council held on January 29, 1990 . Mr. Fitzgerald stated that he had circulated a petition in Hampton concerning Council ' s decision made in November of 1989 that a "footbridge only" be constructed on Mill Street to replace the bridge which was removed in 1988 . 2 . 2 The petition contained three statements as follows : Number of Signatures 1 . We the undersigned like the decision made by Council and would like it to be a walkway bridge. 13 2 . We the undersigned are not pleased with the decision made by Council concerning the Mill Street Bridge. We would like a Two Lane Bridge 82 . . . 3 X2 05 REPORT NO. : WD-21-90 PAGE 3 Number of Signatures 3 . We the undersigned are not pleased with the decision made by Council concerning the Mill Street Bridge. We would like a One Lane Bridge 132 2 . 3 In response to the presentation made by Mr. Fitzgerald, Council passed the following resolution: "THAT the issue of reinstatement of the Mill Street Bridge be referred back to the Director of Public Works for the preparation of a report in which the acquisition of land from the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority for a footpath is addressed; and THAT the delegation of Mr. Fitzgerald be acknowledged and he be advised of Council 's decision. " 2 . 4 At a meeting on February 12 , 1990, Council approved Recommendation #GPA-106-90: "THAT the concerns of Yvonne Lindeburg and petition from residents stating their preference for a footbridge in Hampton, be addressed in future reports on this matter and the delegations be acknowledged and advised. " 3 . 0 REVIEW AND COMMENT 3 . 1 Previous Report WD-86-90 On November 20, 1989, the General Purpose and Administration Committee considered Report WD-86-89 which recommended: "THAT the Director of Public Works be authorized to proceed with the construction of a foot bridge on Mill Street at an estimated cost of $150, 000 . " (Alternative 1) . . 4 1206 REPORT NO. : WD-21-90 PAGE 4 The Committee recommended to Council that the report be approved and Council adopted the Committees recommendation at a meeting held on November 27, 1989 . 3 .2 Report WD-86-89 also discussed another option of constructing a two-lane bridge and roadway and a sidewalk on the north side of Mill Street. The estimated cost for this alternative was $850, 000 (Alternative 2 ) . 3 . 3 In response to Council 's resolution, three other alternatives have been examined: ALTERNATIVE 3 Construction of a single lane bailey bridge aligned with the existing single and approach embankments with a pedestrian walkway and footbridge on C.L.O.C.A. lands north of the road embankment, at the floodplain level . ALTERNATIVE 4 Construction of a single lane bailey bridge with a cantilevered sidewalk, aligned with the existing single lane approach embankments . Pedestrian traffic west of the bailey bridge will be accommodated by widening the existing approach embankment to the north and constructing a pedestrian walkway at the top of existing embankment grade; ALTERNATIVE 5 Construction of the previously designed concrete box culvert, inlet structure and spillway, located on the future two lane roadway alignment north of the existing crossing, together with 130 m+ of single lane, rural cross-section roadway to connect the approaches . This alternative also includes widening the west approach embankment to the north to accommodate a pedestrian walkway at the top of the existing embankment grade. . . . 5 1. 207 REPORT NO. : WD-21-90 PAGE 5 3 . 4 The pros and cons of Alternatives 3, 4, and 5 are discussed in detail on pages 4 to 7 of the Totten Sims Hubicki Associates Report (Attachment No. 1) . Following is a summary of the five alternatives which have been considered. ALTERNATIVE 1 • Footbridge only a) Estimated Cost b) Advantages $150, 000 - Lowest cost of all alternatives . Prevents through traffic from using King Street and McCallum Street, which are residential streets . C) Disadvantages All vehicular traffic must use Taunton Road to get to and from the east and west sides of Hampton. Is not the preferred alternative by the majority of the residents of Hampton. ALTERNATIVE 2 : Two lane bridge, two lane road and a sidewalk on the north side of Mill Street. a) Estimated cost b Advantages 850, 000 ntages It is the ultimate solution and provides for both vehicular safety and pedestrian safety. C) Disadvantages High cost Encourages through traffic to use King Street and McCallum Street, which are residential streets . ALTERNATIVE 3: Single lane bailey bridge aligned with the existing single lane approach embankments, with a pedestrian walkway and footbridge on C.L.O.C.A. lands north of the road embankments, at the flood plain level. . . . 6 I REPORT NO. : WD-21-90 PAGE 6 a) Estimated Cost $385, 000 b) Advantages - Pedestrian and vehicular traffic are separated. C ) Disadvantages - High cost in relation to Alternatives 4 and 5 - does not provide a permanent solution to the problem - The footbridge would be susceptible to damage caused by flooding of the Bowmanville Creek due to its location in floodplain. - Probable high maintenance costs of the footbridge. - The bailey bridge cannot be obtained by loan from the Ministry of Transportation. - The bailey bridge cannot be obtained by loan from the Ministry of Transportation ALTERNATIVE 4 : Single lane bailey bridge with a cantilevered sidewalk aligned with the existing single lane approach embankments . Pedestrian traffic west of the bailey bridge will be accommodated by widening the existing approach embankment to the north and constructing a pedestrian walkway at the top of existing embankment grade. a) Estimated Cost $290,000 b) Advantages Second lowest cost of the 5 alternatives . Satisfies the wishes of the majority of the residents in the area (according to the petition) . c) Disadvantages Does not provide a permanent solution Does not solve the problem of two-way traffic on a narrow roadway. Does not provide flexibility of future widening of Mill Street. 1. 209 REPORT NO. WD-21-90 PAGE 7 - The. bailey bridge cannot be obtained by loan from the Ministry of Transportation ALTERNATIVE 5 : Concrete box culvert, inlet structure and spillway, located on the future two lane roadway alignment north of the existing crossing, together with 130 m+ of single lane, rural cross-section roadway to connect the approaches . This alternative also includes widening the west approach embankment to the north to accommodate a pedestrian walkway at the top of existing embankment grade. a) Estimated Cost (including improvements to streetlighting) $375, 000 b) Advantages It is the ultimate solution for the crossing of Bowmanville Creek. In effect, it is the phasing of Alternate 2 . - Provides for pedestrian traffic . C) Disadvantages Relatively high cost. 4 . 0 CONCLUSIONS 4 . 1 The petition submitted by Mr. Ken Fitzgerald indicates that the vast majority of the residents of Hampton do not approve of the footbridge only alternative. i 4 . 2 Based on the foregoing, my preference is Alternative 5, which provides for the ultimate structure over Bowmanville Creek, provides for widening of Mill Street to provide for pedestrian traffic and is compatible with the future widening of Mill Street to provide for two lanes of traffic plus a sidewalk for pedestrian traffic . I I . . . 8 1 ') ifl REPORT NO. : WD-21-90 PAGE 8 5 . 0 RECOMMENDATIONS 5 . 1 It is, therefore, recommended that Alternative 5, construction in 1990, of a concrete box culvert, inlet structure and spillway, located on the future two lane roadway alignment north of the existing crossing, together with 130 m+ of single lane, rural cross-section roadway to connect the approaches . This alternative also includes widening the west approach embankment to the north to accommodate a pedestrian walkway at the top of the existing grade; . 5 . 2 THAT the funds for the estimated cost of $375, 000 be obtained from the Roads Capital Reserve ( $75, 000) and from the Lot Levy Reserve ( $300,000) ; and 5 . 3 THAT Mr. Ken Fitzgerald, Ms . Yvonne Lindeburg and the other residents of Hampton be advised of Council 's decision. Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee, - ------------------------ ---------------------------- Walter A. Evans, P. Eng. , Lawrence E . Kotseff, Director of Public Works. Chief Administrative Officer. WAE*llv March 5, 1990 Attachment cc: Ms . Yvonne Lindeburg General Delivery Hampton, Ontario LOB 1J0 Mr. Ken Fitzgerald Box 155 Hampton, Ontario LOB 1J0 X211 G.L.TOTTEN B.Sc.,P.Eng. R.E.SIMS B.A.Sc.,P.Eng. ❑ J.M.HUBICKI BA.Sc.,OAA,P.Eng. R.L.WINDOVER M.Sc.,P.Eng. P.C.EBERLEE BA.Sc., P.Eng. CONSULTANTS TOTTEN SIMS HUSICKI ASSOCIATES(1961)LIMITED 1500 HOPKINS STREET,WHITBY,ONTARK1 CANADA,UN 2C3 totten sims hubicki associates (4111)888-9353 Fax:888.0221 February 22nd, 1990 Mr. W. A. Evans, P. Eng. Director of Public Works " ��-. "'°°-�-�-�- A t TES I I{�N +� OF hEpt@ and Flk Town of Newcastle NEWCAS�� niscus< with 40 Temperance Street ��+ lQ� � �,. Bowmanville, Ontario �1©wAns%et _ L1C 3A6 MAR 01 E'JW Note&Rlatam to�P ! C�Jpleo M tn�stigate and Ripon I Re: Mill Street, Hampton, PUBLIC WOP Town of Newcastle ®EPA ', ` tabs APlp�iate Actron. gym.. .- •�—,_...w..,-.�.�... � ., ...a . IDear Sir: As requested at our meeting of February 16th, 1990, this letter will summarize ( the preliminary engineering studies carried out to determine the feasibility and economics of three (3) alternative proposals for the construction of a replacement structure over the Bowmanville Creek, and associated approach Iworks, to accommodate a single lane of vehicular traffic, as well as pedestrian traffic, on the Mill Street right-of-way, in Hampton, the Town of Newcastle. Background In the Spring of- 1989 the existing 12.2 m span temporary Bailey bridge at the Mill Street crossing of the Bowmanville Creek was removed by the Town's forces ` because of erosion and undermining of the Bailey bridge foundations. In July 1989, the Town directed Totten Sims Hubicki Associates to investigate the feasibility of installing a temporary Bailey bridge or pedestrian footbridge at the site. Geotechnical, hydraulic and structural investigations were carried out and in November 1989 a Feasibility Study Report for the Temporary Crossing of Bowmanville Creek was presented to the Town. Subsequently, in February 1990, the Town directed Totten Sims Hubicki Associates to investigate the feasibility of the following additional alternatives: ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS 1212 i 2 _ i) Construction of a single lane bailey bridge aligned with the existing single lane approach embankments, with a pedestrian walkway and footbridge on CLOCA lands north of the road embankment, at the floodplain level. ii) Construction of a single lane bailey bridge with a cantilevered sidewalk, aligned with the existing single lane approach embankments. Pedestrian traffic west of the bailey bridge will be accommodated by widening the existing approach embankment to the north and constructing a pedestrian t walkway at the top of existing embankment grade. iii) Construction of the previously designed concrete box culvert, inlet structure and spillway, located on the future two lane roadway alignment north of the existing crossing, together with 130 m± of single lane, rural cross-section roadway to connect the approaches. This alternative also includes widening the west approach embankment to the north to accommodate a pedestrian walkway at the top of existing embankment grade. (( Geotechnical Investigations 1. ( Subsurface investigations in the area of the proposed crossing were carried out and reported on by Site Investigation Services Limited in June 1976, August 1989, and January 1990. i 1 The initial 1976 Soils Report recommended that the cast-in-place concrete culvert and spillway structure could be satisfactorily founded on the inorganic native stony silty sand till or the underlying silt soils. The subsequent 1989 Soils Report investigated soil .conditions after the erosion and washout of the existing structure, and provided recommendations for the construction of a temporary structure crossing.. I The latest Soils Report (January 1990) reviewed the geotechnical conditions at the crossing site relative to the installation of a pedestrian footbridge and the proposed armour stone channelization works. t totten sims hubicki associates 113 f. 3 - Hydraulic Investigations I Concrete_Culvert_and_Spillwav Structure J A hydraulic investigation was carried out in February 1989 to.-provide recommendations for the design of a permanent concrete culvert and spillway structure at the subject site. The purpose of the hydraulic investigation was to i) determine a structure i opening capable of conveying the 50 year design flood discharge without overtopping the road during the 100 year flood, and without producing f significant upstream water level increases for the 50 year, 100 year and Regional Storm floods, and ii) determine the spillway structure geometry required to dissipate the 50 year and 100 year flood flow energies from a Isupercritical state to a subcritical state. The recommended culvert structure is a 4.6 metre span by 3.3 m rise concrete box culvert. The recommended spillway structure drops through a total of 4.0 metres through two inclined sections constructed at a 2:1 slope. Energy dissipator blocks located at the inlet of the concrete culvert and lower spillway section will dissipate the excessive amount of kinetic energy carried in the design flows. The recommended culvert and spillway are illustrated on Dwg. No. Z5. Armour_Stone_Chaunelization Works f . Further hydraulic investigations, for the design of channelization works to be constructed in conjunction with a bailey bridge replacement structure, were carried out in August 1989. The purpose of the hydraulic investigation was to i) determine the channel profile required to transition the streambed invert through a 4.0 m± vertical 1 drop, and ii) determine the erosion protection measures necessary to ensure the structural integrity of the proposed bailey bridge. The channel profile and lerosion protection were designed for the 50 year Design Storm Flow. '12 14 f totten sims hubicki associates I _ 4 _ The recommended channel profile, as illustrated on Dwg. No. Z4, consists of a series of three (3) basins designed to dissipate the energy created by the 4.0 m± drop in streambed elevation, and thereby reduce the potential for erosion of the stream channel. A steel sheet pile cut-off wall is required at the upstream end of the channel works to prevent degradation of the upstream channel. The recommended channel section consists of a rectangular channel i approximately 5 m wide with vertical walls. Despite the implementation of the control basins, the design velocity will be a 4 relatively high 3.64 m/sec. (12 ft/sec) and substantial erosion protection will be required on the channel bottom and banks. Three (3) types of erosion protection methods/materials were considered; i) large gradation rock protection, ii) gabions, and iii) armour stone. Armour stone is recommended because it has the greatest resistance to the anticipated erosive and hydraulic forces. The recommended channelization works are illustated on Dwg. No. Z4. Proposed Improvements 1 Three (3) additional alternative proposals for a vehicular and pedestrian crossing capable of accommodating a single lane of vehicular traffic and safe pedestrian passage have been considered. The three alternatives are summarized as follows: Alternative No_ 1 s Alternative No. 1 consists of the construction of a singl e lane 21 3 m p an bailey bridge together with the armour stone channelization works. The bailey bridge is aligned with the existing approach embankments in order to minimize the required roadworks. However, the roadworks should include the repaving of I, the existing approach roads, from the King Street intersection to a point approximately 16 m east of the proposed bailey bridge. Pedestrian traffic would be accommodated with a separate 15.24 m span pedestrian footbridge and i walkway constructed in the floodplain on an alignment north of and parallel to 1 the roadway embankment. See Dwg. Nos. Z1 and Z4. Preliminary Estimated Cost: $385,000.00. { totten sims hubicki associates 1 115 i, 5 - i i A copy of the Breakdown of Preliminary Cost Estimates is attached. Alternative No. 1 is not considered practical or economically feasible, based on the following: _. i) High construction cost ($385,000.00) in relation to Alternatives No. 2 and 3. ii) The construction of the footbridge and pedestrian walkway on lands owned by the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority north of the existing roadway embankment would require approval of the Authority. iii) The footbridge and walkway would be susceptible to damage caused by flooding of the Bowmanville Creek on a frequent basis due to the location in the floodplain. To avoid structural damage to the footbridge, the superstructure would have to be removed during periods of intensive runoff. iv) As the proposed ali footbridge/walkway nment is located within the limits g of the old mill pond, the existing subsoil conditions will likely consist of a deposit of silt and organic materials. The walkway would be subject to continued deterioration and damage resulting in excessive maintenance costs. Alternative No_ 2 Alternative No. 2 consists of a 21.3 m span single lane bailey bridge with a cantilevered sidewalk, constructed in conjunction with the recommended armour stone channelization works. The proposed bailey bridge is aligned with the existing approach embankments east and west of the crossing. To provide improved safety for pedestrians, the west approach embankment from west limit i of the Old Mill pond to the bailey bridge will be widened to the north to accommodate a 1.5 m wide asphalt walkway constructed on a grade to match the i - totten sims hubicki associates 1216 i I - 6 - existing road. The existing single lane west approach will be repaved in conjunction with the asphalt walkway construction, and a line of timber guide posts installed between the north edge of the driving lane and the pedestrian walkway. The lateral limits of the driving lane and walkway .should be line j painted to provide further delineation. The proposed bailey bridge, channelization works and approach works are illustrated on Dwgs. No. Z2 and Z4. Preliminary Estimated Cost: $290,000.00. A copy of the Breakdown of Preliminary Cost Estimates is attached. 1 ' It is noted that Alternative No. 2 does not provide flexibility for the future widening of Mill Street. When compared to a concrete structure crossing, this alternative would also have higher annual maintenance costs and the bailey bridge components would have a shorter life span due to corrosion and fatigue. It is also noted that the bailey bridge components for Alternatives No. 1 and 2 ( cannot be obtained on loan from the Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, because the Ministry considers these alternatives to be permanent installations. Refer to the copy of the letter from the Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Approvals Section, dated February 21st, 1990, contained in the Appendix. As a result, the cost estimates for these alternatives include an allowance of $80,000 for. the cost of purchasing the bailey bridge components, in addition to the erection costs. f Alternative No. 3 Alternative No. 3 consists of a concrete box culvert and spillway constructed on a new roadway alignment north of the existing embankment. This structure concept was previously designed in 1989 by TSH as part of a proposed reconstruction of Mill Street to a two lane urban cross-section extending from King Street to Old Scugog Road. For Alternative No. 3, the proposed roadworks would be limited to constructing 130 m± of new single lane rural roadway to connect the new structure with the existing approaches east and west of the 1 creek crossing, repaving the remainder of the existing west approach to the t totten sims hubicki associates { 1 '217 - 7 - King Street intersection, and widening the west approach embankment to accommodate a 1.5 m asphalt walkway on the north side of the existing roadway, similar to the walkway proposed for Alternative No. 2. The proposed culvert; spillway and approach works are illustrated on Drawings No. V and Z5, contained in the Appendix. Preliminary Estimated Cost: $365,000.00. A copy of 1 the Breakdown of Preliminary Cost Estimate is attached. i It is noted that Alternative No. 3 will accommodate the future widening of Mill Street on a preferred horizontal alignment. The concrete culvert and spillway I are permanent structures with an approximate 50 year plus life expectancy and minimal maintenance costs. Considering the location of the site within the Village of Hampton, the aesthetic characteristics of this alternative are more appealing than a bailey bridge. I Recommendations Following an evaluation of the results of the preliminary engineering studies, it is recommended that the alternative consisting of a concrete box culvert and spillway be implemented based on economic, practical and aesthetic considerations, and the ability to accommodate the future widening of Mill Street. Although the preliminary estimated cost for the bailey bridge and cantilevered sidewalk alternative is initially less than the preliminary estimated cost for the recommended alternative, the advantages of the concrete box culvert and spillway more than offset this initial cost difference. All three alternatives considered in this Report will accommodate only a single 1 lane of vehicular traffic at present. It is recommended that consideration be given to the installation of automatic signals to safely control vehicular traffic crossing the single lane bridge and west approach. The preliminary ball-park estimate of the additional cost to supply and install automatic signals at a location just east of the King Street intersection and immediately east of the proposed bridge is $30,000.00. I totten sims hubicki associates 1 � 1 � C- 8 - IIt is further recommended that consideration be given to improving the existing lighting system on Mill Street between King Street and the east side of the Bowmanville Creek. The preliminary ball-park estimate of the additional cost I for street lighting is $10,000.00. I We trust that the foregoing will be satisfactory for your requirements and we would be pleased to elaborate on any aspect of this Report as may be required. Yours very truly, G. L. Aleong, P. Eng. M. G. Shallhorn, P. Eng. Vice-President, Structural Project Manager ( GLA/dh RUFE� 10 < ';-..., <)6G I totten sims hubicki associates 1219 l f fMILL STREET, HAMPTON TOWN OF NEWCASTLE -` FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT fVEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OF BOWMANVILLE CREEK f . APPENDIX Breakdown of Preliminary Cost Estimates: - Alternative No. 1: Bailey Bridge and Pedestrian Footbridge - Alternative No. 2: Bailey Bridge with Cantilevered Sidewalk l - Alternative No. 3: Concrete Culvert and Spillway Letter by Mr. M. Holowka, P. Eng. , Head, Approvals Section, Ministry of `_. Transportation, Ontario, dated February 21st, 1990. fDwg. No. Z1 - Alternative No. 1: Bailey Bridge and Pedestrian Footbridge, Site Plan Dwg. No. Z2 - Alternative No. 2: Bailey Bridge with Cantilevered Sidewalk, Site Plan Dwg. No. Z4 - Alternatives No. 1 and 2, Bailey Bridge: Channelization Works f . , Dwg. No. Z3 - Alternative No. 3: Concrete Culvert and Spillway, Site Plan Dwg. No. Z5 - Alternative No. 3: General Arrangement f I f ) )) (ll L ll i February 22nd, 1990 MILL STREET, HAMPTON TOWN OF NEWCASTLE BREAKDOWN OF PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE: Alternative No. 1 - Bailey Bridge and Pedestrian Footbridge I Item Estimated Unit No Description of Item Quantity Price Total i 1. Supply 21.3 m Span Bailey Bridge Lump Sum $ 77,500.00 2. Erect 21.3 m Span Bailey Bridge Lump Sum $ 45,000.00 3. Channelization Works Lump Sum $ 55,000.00 4. Pedestrian Footbridge Lump Sum $ 80,000.00 5. Pedestrian Walkway Lump Sum $ 22,500.00 6. Roadworks Including Repaving ( Existing West Approaches Lump Sum $ 40.000.00 I Sub-Total $320,000.00 Contingencies and Engineering $ 65.000.00 TOTAL PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE - ALTERNATIVE NO. 1* $385,000.00 1 *Excluding Lighting and Signalization Costs totten sims hubicki associates 12. 21 February 22nd, 1990 MILL STREET, HAMPTON TOWN OF NEWCASTLE BREAKDOWN OF PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE: Alternative No. 2 - Bailey Bridge With Cantilevered. Sidewalk Item Estimated Unit No. Description of Item Quantity Price Total 1. Supply 21.3 m Span Bailey Bridge With Cantilevered Sidewalk Lump Sum $ 80,000.00 2. Erect 21.3 m Span Bailey Bridge With Cantilevered Sidewalk Lump Sum $ 47,500.00 3. Channelization Works Lump Sum $ 55,000.00 4. Earth Borrow 300 m3 $ 10.00 $ 3,000.00 5. Roadworks Including Pedestrian Walkway Lump Sum $ 52,000.00 Sub-Total $240,000.00 Contingencies and Engineering $ 50,000.00 TOTAL PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE - ALTERNATIVE NO. 2* $290,000.00 *Excluding Lighting and Signalization Costs I totten sims hubicki associates 1 February 22nd, 1990 MILL STREET, HAMPTON TOWN OF NEWCASTLE BREAKDOWN OF PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE: Alternative No. 3 - Concrete Culvert and Spillway Item Estimated Unit No Description of Item Ouantity Price Total I 1. Concrete Culvert and Spillway Lump Sum $240,000.00 �. 2. Earth Borrow 500 m3 $ 10.00 $ 5,000.00 3, Roadworks Including Pedestrian J Walkway Lump Sum $ 60,000.00 t Sub-Total $305,000.00 Contingencies and Engineering $ 60.000.00 TOTAL PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE - ALTERNATIVE NO. 3* $365,000.00 f *Excluding Lighting and Signalization Costs f 1. f 1 1 2 2 3 totten sims hubicki associates f , Ontario IMinistry of Structural Office Transportation and 7th rloor, Atrium Downsview, Ontario Communications M3X 1JS February 21, 1990 Mr. G. L. Aleong, P. Eng. Totten Sims Hubicki Associates 1500 Hopkins Street Whitby, Ontario LIN 2C3 RAE: Mill Street, Hampton, Town of Newcastle M.T.O. Site 021-560 Vurther to your letter of February 7th, 1990 concerning the use of ( a bailay bridge at the above location, our comments are given below; l 1. Our central stores are ourrently clouted for inventoty1 however, i I believe all the materials requited for a standard width bridge are available except for the footwaik bearer for the cantilevered sidewalk which is a special order. The availability can be checked with the supplier, Acrow (Canada) Ltd. , 249.8697. 2. The total cost of the bailey material in $65,000.00 including F.S.T. and P.S.T. The total weight of the material is about 14 tonnes. Since this is for a permanent installation, the Town �._ would be charged for the material at the replacement cost of $65,000.00. I3. All transportation, erection, and dismantling costs as well as the timber decking costs are the responsibility of the user. 4. It you decide to use the bailey bridge, the District should be contacted concerning your request. 5. The use of bailey material, at a unit cost of almost $4,500.00 per tonne, seems to be an expensive option. The use of concrete culverts, one has already been approved for this site, or the use I of prefabricated trusses may be a more economic and esethically pleasing solution. If I can be of further assistance, please call. Yours truly, I I M. Holotlka Bead, Approvals Section hd 1224 ww. n Mnt7�11 MILL STREET HAMPTON INFORMATION CENTRE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE ALTERNATIVE FOOTBRIDGE ONLY - ON ALIGNMENT OF EXISTING ROAD, ESTIMATED COST: $} 150 000 I/WE THE UNDERSIGNED SUPPORT THE SUBJECT DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENTSi Name Address Remarks P m �t;ll , 11 5 i J Vtb QRM. tS i dN� ST qMN r T 0 p 2 oRM ISTo rI sr. D , �6 �'�t (0 5 Y�o Ca�.e•r. St• i)aot- rcccLisizz-0, c C .Lt.r, S7 .i 6- �2E F41Z wR rs ^ry SA •�q o wR iA X QoLz/41zs ATTACHIENT N0 ,2 --•-------•---------•--^•_--. _—__.—__^-----5-_ _- -=.;.t..:�.a/.•• ',...(' �-""�'y'`'�(_� It '. MILL STREET HAMPTON 1 NFORPA ION OEN THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE �ALTERN E `" I TWO LANE UCTURE)1 INCLUDIINGAAES SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH S NORTH DE OF OF EXISTING S7R MILL STREET, g50 000 ESTIMATED COST : /WE THE UNDERSIGNED SUPPORT THE SUBJECT DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENTS,m Name Address � --- MILL STREET HAMPTON INFORMATION CENTRE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE ALTERNATIVE SINGLE LANE BAILEY BRIDGE CONSTRUCTED ON ALIGNMENT OF EXISTING ROAD AND FOOTBRIDGE WITH PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY CONSTRUCTED ON CENTRAL LAKE ONTARIO REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY PROPERTY PLACED AT THE FLOODPLAIN LEVEL. ( NORTH OF EXISTING BRIDGE) ESTIMATED COST. $ 385 000 V/WE THE UNDERSIGNED SUPPORT THE SUBJECT DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENTSr Name Address Remarks I I i l I MILL STREET HAMPTON INFORMATION CENTRE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE ALTERNATIVE 411 SINGLE LANE BAILEY BRIDGE (WITH A CANTILEVERED SIDEWALK) CONSTRUCTED ON ALIGNMENT OF EXISTING ROAD. WIDEN NORTH SIDE OF EXISTING MILL STREET EMBANKMENT (WEST OF BRIDGE SITE) AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMODATE A PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY. ESTIMATED COST: 290000 I/WE THE UNDERSIGNED SUPPORT THE SUBJECT DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENTSr Name Address Remarks l MILL STREET HAMPTON INFORMATION CENTRE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE ALTERNATIVE S 1 TWO LANE BRIDGE ( BRIDGE DESIGN AND LOCATION SIMILAR TO ALTERNATIVE 2 ) INCLUDING WIDENING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EXISTING MILL STREET EMBANKMENT (WEST OF BRIDGE SITE) AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMODATE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY. WEST APPROACH ROADWAY TO REMAIN FOR USE AS SINGLE. LANE., ESTIMATED COST $ 375000 (INCLUDING IMPROVEMENTS TO STREETLIGHTING) 1/WE THE UNDERSIGNED SUPPORT THE SUBJECT DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENTS1 Name Address Remarks 4 �a s-i S� Tdr-jr/-OCIY e-?Ca/anGL'6OA S' y Sf a o s r3 M �\f6L j5V EELS Se GOG Sr DD Al L E Al,L Ae / T " I'DS� WD ' r 093 0-(26 � 5 a 9 �J�w �•� sl A5q-x,1.4 G a so\ -��5 ?.AL aN SGUC.00. I sccrot O i 6 o o Sc cwt +, r MILL STREET HAMPTON INFORMATION CENTRE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE -ALTERNATIVE 5 TWO LANE BRIDGE ( BRIDGE DESIGN AND LOCATION SIMILAR TO ALTERNATIVE 2 ) INCLUDING WIDENING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EXISTING MILL STREET EMBANKMENT (WEST OF BRIDGE SITE) AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMODATE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY, WEST APPROACH ROADWAY TO REMAIN FOR USE AS SINGLE. LANE•, ESTIMATED COST: $ 375000. (INCLUDING IMPROVEMENTS TO STREETLIGHTING) I/WE THE UNDERSIGNED SUPPORT THE SUBJECT DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENTS, Name Address Remarks /114/ GJZx-r r- 4/ra C" •� a F CY-e /'D/l d 1/t!( /.A�JQ-(�,�lt..-�� / �•!/��7 /X//LiA/1171 .,_-�' N/-/Y1"�//J�, Y D� IJ'i �a �L!r��wp" GQ G ��IJ /Z/,I`1'seAIt , T✓ � I'LL ent- T MILL STREET HAMPTON INFORMATION CENTRE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE ALTERNATIVE 5 t TWO LANE BRIDN WIDENING ON BRIDGE THE NORTH SIDE OF EXISTING ELPEDESTRIANMWALKWAY.T INCLUDING WIDE (WEST OF BRIDGE SITE) AS NECESSARY TO ACC WEST APPROACH ROADWAY TO REMAIN FOR USE AS SINGLE, LANE,. ESTIMATED COST $ 375000 (INCLUDING IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENTS: I/WE THE UNDERSIGNED SUPPORT THE Remarks Name Address -- i Ce�l�h r �yu6AJ SET vc--K TNAni jo VIrJEO J7T lJ/aw1 m ��`- _ 6-"r*j (AJ 6 S� e 6 o�ck MILL STREET HAMPTON INFORMATION CENTRE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE AL-TEIRrNJ IVE 5 1 ALTERNATIVE 2 TWO LAN BRAD(WIDENING( NORTH SIDE OF EXISOTINGMMILL S� EET EMBANKMENT INCLUDING (WEST OF BRIDGE RSITE) AS TO REMAIN FOR ASE ASDASINGLE, LANE. WEST APPROACH: WALKWAY. O ESTIMATED COST $ 375000 (INCLUDING IMPROVEMENTS E TSDEOSCR•IBEDT IMPROIVEMENTS, I/WE THE UNDERSIGNED SUPPORT TH Remarks Name Address f �' �� /dy To Whom it May Concern: Having lived my 82 years in Hampton, I am particularly interested in seeing the Mill Pond Bridge replaced again for vehicular and pedestrian traffic . This has been the main connecting route between the east and west side of the pond for the past 100 years . Thanks M. Laverne Clemens ATTACHIE11T NO .4 10-21-90 ADDENDUM 17 , Hampton, Ontario April 4, 1990 To Whom it May Concern: resent at the hearing today, but I have a I will be unable to be p few comments to make. uestion just this morning and find First: I viewed the area in q ears my family a most disgusting mess . For over d have eY o ed fishing and I have lived on mill Street N thereisnothing but and the view from the bridge• holes, and a gaping holes a pile of rocks, no fishing where a road used to be and should be. As a matter of saving lives, last week an ambulance made an error to pick-up a patient atient on the other side of the Consequently by the time the ambulance retrace village. the patient could have been more seriously its routs, ill. seconds count. Afire call from Third: In case of fire, longer route to the scene by going Enniskillen means a long via Taunton Road. others will find a walkway beneficial seniors or Fourth: How many from one side to the other. to them when traversing Fifth: Mill Street is in dire need i bridge and road would be I maintain a one-way or two-way more satisfactory to more residents . In conclusion may I add that delay causes a waste of money and perhaps lives . Sincerely Raymond Farrow ,'ITT AUMEMT dO 0!3 '40-21-00 ADDENDUM 124 �tiE C�;tZpOEtT+P ION OI•' 1'HF; 'POwtJ OF NE47CAS1'LE. 75-23 being a by-law tieing a E17-1>'� to amend By within the Chwayration Hate certain 9 °Throog h Hig s., of the Town of Newcastle as Corporation of the 'Down of m Newcastle dees th 75-23• F:A•,; tk;; Covnc.,il f �`1-la*" „ 1 of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle F tr! THE'REF'ORE 'rho +--ounr_i follows enacts as : -g^ to By-law 75-23 is amended under Item #2 1) Schedule r,,ference: by deleting the followin4 COLUMN 2 COLUMN UMN l BETwEEIN Y'PF: tlIGtl'Jr.Y limit of Durham The north Road 4 and the Street and King Street Regional the Old 2 kin Combinatiofl) west limit. of Scugog Road. on receiving the approval of law shall coma into force when signs to the effect 2) The Region", Municipality the are erected- 1990. time this day of 2y-Law read a fir 1990• this day of a second time 1990 By-Law read this day third t of 1�y _Law read a ime and finally passed -------" MAYOR Ag ACi AE!1-j 110