HomeMy WebLinkAboutPUB-001-26Staff Report
If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To: General Government Committee
Date of Meeting: March 2, 2026 Report Number: PUB-001-26
Authored By: Slav Potrykus, Traffic Engineering Supervisor, Public Works
Submitted By: Lee-Ann Reck, Deputy CAO, Public Services
Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO
By-law Number: Resolution Number:
File Number:
Report Subject: Social Awareness Crosswalk Maintenance
Recommendations:
1.That Report PUB-001-26, and any related delegations or communication items, be
received;
2.That Council support the recommendations contained in Report PUB-001-26 for the
ongoing maintenance and replacement of crosswalks designed to promote social
awareness;
3.That Council direct staff to include the ongoing maintenance financial requirements
in future operating budget requests;
4.That Council direct staff, where future social awareness crosswalks are approved or
implemented, the ongoing maintenance, renewal, and replacement costs associated
with those crosswalks be identified and incorporated into future operating and capital
budget submissions, as applicable;
5.That Council acknowledges enhanced crosswalk treatments require ongoing
lifecycle funding to ensure safety, visibility, and program sustainability,
6.That future approvals be considered in alignment with available budget capacity,
and;
7.That all interested parties listed in Report PUB-001-26, be advised of Council’s
decision.
GG-051-26
Municipality of Clarington Page 2
Report PUB-001-26
Report Overview
This report provides Council with an overview of the maintenance and resource implications
associated with Social Awareness Crosswalks within the Municipality of Clarington as
requested through report CAO-019-25, presented on November 3, 2025. While these
crosswalks support community recognition and inclusion, they also function as regulated
traffic control features and require enhanced cost and maintenance beyond the required
standard pavement markings.
With the expansion of the program, increasing costs and operational implications, this report
outlines the implications of sustaining the program under current practices and identify the
need for additional operating funding to ensure continued safety, visibility, and integrity.
1. Background
Social Awareness crosswalks in Clarington
1.1 Provincial traffic pavement markings specifications, as outlined in the Ontario Traffic
Manual series of books, do not specifically provide any details on the use of colours for
pedestrian facilities or for social awareness crosswalks. Therefore, any of the non-
standard colours and materials are considered custom and carry a significantly higher
installation, maintenance, and replacement cost. Sourcing these materials has become
increasingly challenging due to the dependence on materials sourced from the United
States which may be subject to tariffs and price escalation.
1.2 Currently, Clarington has three social awareness crosswalks, which include:
• Rainbow crosswalk at the south leg of Mearns Avenue and Apple Blossom
Boulevard
o Installed in May 2019
o Cost at time of installation was approximately $9,000
• Orange crosswalk at the south leg of Temperance Street and Church Street
o Installed in September 2022
o Cost for the initial materials was $5,200, installed internally, as per the
manufacturer instructions
o Crosswalk material failed over the Winter and due to the construction
activities at the old Canada Post building, and was removed and reinstalled
with another type of material in July 2023
Municipality of Clarington Page 3
Report PUB-001-26
o Cost of the removal, and reinstallation with different supplier was
approximately $15,000
• Veteran crosswalk at the north leg of Temperance Street and King Street
o Installed in September 2025
o Cost at the time of installation was approximately $28,000
o The crosswalk is already showing signs of wear and damage caused by
winter operations. It will require attention as soon as practicable.
1.3 These social awareness crosswalks were installed across Clarington as a visible
commitment to inclusion, equity, and representation. Their presence reflects the efforts
of community members who mobilized for change, advocating for spaces that affirm
identity and celebrate diversity. These crosswalks are symbols of belonging and
respect and are visible reminders that reinforces that Clarington is a place where
everyone can feel seen, valued, and safe.
2. Public Works Considerations
Rainbow Crosswalk
2.1 The Rainbow crosswalk has experienced a high number of vandalism incidents,
including tire marks from burnouts or from intentionally aggressive braking. This
unfortunate behavior is in line with the experiences of many other road jurisdictions and
their Rainbow crosswalks. The City of Burlington Council approved the removal of all
their Rainbow crosswalks due to the ongoing vandalism and unsustainable
maintenance costs. The recognition continues with the new Rainbow pole wrap
program instead.
2.2 While initially there was enough pavement marking material to allow for pressure
washing and removal of the tire marks, the crosswalk currently is showing significant
deterioration and fading. The crosswalk has surpassed its life cycle, and a complete
removal and replacement is required if the program is to continue in its current format.
2.3 Council recently approved Report CAO-019-25, which further detailed the current state
of the Rainbow crosswalk.
2.4 As the crosswalk has reached its end-of-life cycle, it is required to be removed entirely
and replaced with new material. The estimated removal cost at the current prices is
approximately $10,000, and the installation cost is approximately $25,000. This cycle
should be repeated every 4-6 years.
Municipality of Clarington Page 4
Report PUB-001-26
Orange Crosswalk
2.5 As mentioned in Section 1.2, the Orange crosswalk has demonstrated a premature
failure with the initial product and due to the overlapping construction activities at the
time. Consideration should also be given to the original condition of the pavement that
the crosswalk is applied to. Temperance Street asphalt surface is old and shows signs
of pitting and oxidizing. Any future replacements of the Orange crosswalk may require
a section of the asphalt to be removed and replaced, like the Veteran crosswalk that
was installed just to the south.
2.6 The Orange crosswalk is currently in good condition. However, the maintenance or
replacement cost for it may escalate, as the asphalt surface is not suitable for any
subsequent direct reinstallations. Therefore, any future maintenance costs should
include the cost of the crosswalk removal at approximately $10,000 and the installation
at approximately $15,000 and the cost of the removal and installation of asphalt at
approximately $15,000. After the asphalt is replaced, the subsequent crosswalk
maintenance cost would only include the removal and installation of the Orange
crosswalk every 4-6 years.
Veteran Crosswalk
2.7 The Veteran Crosswalk was installed in time for the unveiling on September 30, 2025.
A section of the road was required to be removed and replaced to allow for the detailed
custom graphics to be applied. Due to the complexity of the graphics, any future repairs
may require grinding a portion, or potentially the entire crosswalk graphic to maintain
the crosswalk within acceptable appearance and condition.
2.8 Since the Veteran crosswalk is very new, and already includes new asphalt surface, it
is anticipated that the recurring maintenance costs would be approximately $10,000 for
the removal of the crosswalk, and approximately $35,000 for the reinstallation, every 2-
5 years.
Standard Type Crosswalk
2.9 For comparison, a standard 3-metre-wide crosswalk with two white lines and a vehicle
stop line is significantly less dependent on the pavement condition and can be applied
on virtually any hard surface. It also has a longer life expectancy than any of the
coloured pavement markings, typically 5-10 years or beyond. The cost is currently
under $500 per crosswalk.
Summary
2.10 Based on site inspections, staff findings, and market conditions, it is estimated that the
total maintenance cost of the three social awareness crosswalks would be sustainable
with a starting budget of $35,000 and an annual recurring budget of $20,000.
Municipality of Clarington Page 5
Report PUB-001-26
2.11 Public Works is responsible for the maintenance of existing infrastructure within
budgetary provisions. Given the exponentially high costs of the social awareness
crosswalks when compared to a standard crosswalk, Public Works would require an
increase to existing operating budgets to maintain social awareness crosswalks.
3. Financial Considerations
3.1 Due to the disproportionally high capital and maintenance costs of any non-standard
pavement markings, their financial needs are not being covered by the regular
operating account. An initial financial investment of $35,000 to address the immediate
replacement needs is required, with a $20,000 annual budget.
3.2 When approving additional social awareness crosswalks, an initial cost of
approximately $35,000 and an annualized replacement cost of approximately $10,000
per crosswalk should be anticipated. If operating budgets are not increased,
maintenance service levels cannot be sustained.
3.3 The Deputy CAO/Treasurer recommends that funds be included in future budgets,
rather than funded as an in-year allocation. The budget process has already concluded,
and these are resources which should be looked at in accordance with overall financial
requests.
3.4 From an insurance standpoint, these installations are relatively new. While all three
crosswalks include the required white edge-line elements outlined in the Ontario Traffic
Manual – Pavement, Hazard and Delineation Markings (Book 11), the addition of a full-
surface graphics and coloured treatments introduces uncertainty. Because these
features fall outside standard crosswalk design, the potential insurance implications,
should an incident occur in or near a non-standard crosswalk, remain unclear.
3.5 As identified in the Fall, there are alternatives that are more cost effective, providing the
Municipality with the ability to reach more people with lower costs. Given financial
restrictions and the desire to maintain lower operating budgets, the non-standard
crosswalks are not as cost effective as other actions that the Municipality may
undertake to meet the same outcome.
4. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Considerations
4.1 It is the position of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) team, that these
crosswalks speak to positive representation, active inclusion, and increased visibility for
members of equity-deserving groups. As we continue to foster a sense of belonging in
our community, the presence of these crosswalks speak to the strength of community
mobilization around social issues.
4.2 The installation and maintenance of these social awareness crosswalks align with the
Connect pillar in Clarington’s Strategic Plan which aims to cultivate a strong, thriving,
and connected community where everyone is welcome.
Municipality of Clarington Page 6
Report PUB-001-26
4.3 Given the involvement of the community in each of the three crosswalks, such as the
initial fundraising plan to raise capital for the Rainbow crosswalk by the students of
John M. James Public School, the commitment of the Veterans from the Royal
Canadian Legion Branch 178 providing the design and support for the Veteran
crosswalk, and by the involvement of Indigenous community members in the Orange
crosswalk. The DEI team supports their maintenance in principle, while understanding
that financial and operational realities must be considered as part of ongoing
decision-making.
4.4 For future social awareness initiatives, the DEI team will continue collaborating with the
community to explore actions, symbols, and approaches that are both meaningful and
cost-effective. The positive reception of the Pride pole wrap concept (introduced as an
alternative to installing an additional rainbow crosswalk), demonstrated how creative,
lower-cost options can still offer strong visibility and impact with increased community
reach. Building on this model, we will keep identifying thoughtful alternatives that
meaningfully reflect and support our diverse community.
5. Strategic Plan
The social awareness crosswalks align with C.3.1 – to recognize and celebrate the
growing diversity of the community.
6. Climate Change
Not Applicable.
7. Concurrence
This report has been reviewed by the Deputy CAO/Treasurer and Director of Strategic
Initiatives who concur with the recommendations.
8. Conclusion
The Social Awareness Crosswalk Program reflects the Municipality’s ongoing
commitment to community safety, inclusion, and recognition. As the number and
prominence of these crosswalks increase, so too does the need for consistent, high-
quality maintenance to preserve visibility, ensure compliance with applicable safety
standards, and uphold the symbolic intent of each installation.
Should Council decide to sustain the program over the long term, maintenance
requirements must be formally integrated into existing operational practices and
supported by adequate financial resources. An increase in the Public Works operating
budget would be required to address the enhanced maintenance demands, mitigate
risk, and ensure these assets remain safe, respectful, and meaningful for the
community. Proactive investment would support program sustainability and the intent
behind the program.
Municipality of Clarington Page 7
Report PUB-001-26
Staff Contact: Slav Potrykus, Traffic Engineering Supervisor, 905-623-3379 extension 2315 or
spotrykus@clarington.net.
Attachments:
Not Applicable
Interested Parties:
There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision.