The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2026-02-09 Planning and Development Committee Post Agenda Date:February 9, 2026 Time:5:00 p.m. Location:Council Chambers or Electronic Participation Municipal Administrative Centre 40 Temperance Street, 2nd Floor Bowmanville, Ontario Inquiries and Accommodations: For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations for persons attending, please contact: Laura Preston, Temporary Committee Coordinator, at 905-623-3379, ext. 2106 or by email at lpreston@clarington.net. Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Collection, Use and Disclosure of Personal Information: If you make a delegation, or presentation, at a Committee or Council meeting, the Municipality will be recording you and will make the recording public on the Municipality’s website, www.clarington.net/calendar. Written and oral submissions which include home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses become part of the public record. If you have any questions about the collection of information, please contact the Municipal Clerk. Cell Phones: Please ensure all cell phones, mobile and other electronic devices are turned off or placed on non-audible mode during the meeting. Copies of Reports are available at www.clarington.net/archive The Revised Agenda will be published on Wednesday after 12:00 p.m. Late items added or a change to an item will appear with a * beside them. Pages 1.Call to Order 2.Land Acknowledgment Statement 3.Declaration of Interest 4.Announcements 5.Presentations/Delegations 5.1 Delegation by Manus Boonzaier, Algoma Orchards, Regarding a Request to Install an Irrigation Pipe Under the Road on Concession Road 5, Orono 4 5.2 Presentation by David Perkins, Municipality of Clarington and Martina Braunstein, Dillon Consulting, Regarding PDS-006-26 - Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy 6 6.Consent Agenda 6.1 PDS-006-26 - Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy 9 6.2 PDS-015-26 - Intention to Pursue Heritage Designation – Multiple Properties on Centre Street, Bowmanville 196 6.3 PDS-017-26 - Applications for a Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision for 53 residential units at 1430 Prestonvale Road in Courtice 217 7.Items for Separate Discussion 8.New Business 9.Public Meetings (6:30 p.m.) *9.1 Public Meeting for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision 247 Applicant: GHD on behalf of Brookfield Residential (Ontario) Limited Location: 1350 Courtice Road, Courtice Planner: Tyler Robichaud Planning and Development Committee Agenda February 9, 2026 Page 2 9.1.1 PDS-016-26 - Applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision to Facilitate the Development of 62 Residential Units at 1350 Courtice Road in Courtice 252 10.Confidential Items 10.1 LGS-008-26 - OLT Appeal - Lambs Road School Property Ltd. Municipal Act, 2001 Section 239 (2) (e) 11.Adjournment Planning and Development Committee Agenda February 9, 2026 Page 3 From:no-reply@clarington.net To:ClerksExternalEmail Subject:New Delegation Request from Boonzaier Date:Wednesday, January 28, 2026 2:31:06 PM EXTERNAL A new delegation request has been submitted online. Below are the responses provided: Subject Horizontal Directional Drilling Request Action requested of Council Asking for approval on request. Date of meeting 2/9/2026 Summarize your delegation Asking for approval on HDD to install irrigation pipe. Have you been in contact with staff or a member of Council regarding your matter of interest? Yes Name of the staff member or Councillor. Mariano Perini Will you be attending this meeting in person or online? In person First name: Manus Single/Last name Boonzaier Firm/Organization (if applicable) Algoma Orchards Job title (if applicable) Farm Operations Manager Page 4 Address Town/Hamlet Bowmanville Postal code Email address: Phone number Do you plan to submit correspondence related to this matter? No Do you plan to submit an electronic presentation (i.e. PowerPoint)? If yes, the file must be submitted to the Municipal Clerk’s Department by 2 p.m. on the Friday prior to the meeting date. No I acknowledge that the Procedural By-law Permits seven minutes for delegations and five minutes for Public Meeting participants. Yes [This is an automated email notification -- please do not respond] Page 5 From:no-reply@clarington.net To:ClerksExternalEmail Subject:New Delegation Request from Perkins, Braunstein Date:Wednesday, January 28, 2026 11:01:16 AM EXTERNAL A new delegation request has been submitted online. Below are the responses provided: Subject Clarington Waterfront Strategy Action requested of Council Receive presentation Date of meeting 2/9/2026 Summarize your delegation Presentation from Clarington Staff and its Consultant regarding the draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy Have you been in contact with staff or a member of Council regarding your matter of interest? Yes Name of the staff member or Councillor. David Perkins Report number (if known) PDS-006-26 Will you be attending this meeting in person or online? In person First name: 1. David 2. Martina Single/Last name 1. Perkins Page 6 2. Braunstein How to pronounce your name: 1. [Blank] 2. Mar TEE na Firm/Organization (if applicable) 1. Municipality of Clarington 2. Dillon Consulting Job title (if applicable) 1. Principal Planner 2. [Blank] Address 1. 2. Town/Hamlet 1. Bowmanville 2. Bowmanville Postal code 1. 2. Email address: 1. 2. Phone number 1. 2. Do you plan to submit correspondence related to this matter? No Page 7 Do you plan to submit an electronic presentation (i.e. PowerPoint)? If yes, the file must be submitted to the Municipal Clerk’s Department by 2 p.m. on the Friday prior to the meeting date. Yes I acknowledge that the Procedural By-law Permits seven minutes for delegations and five minutes for Public Meeting participants. Yes [This is an automated email notification -- please do not respond] Page 8 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: February 9, 2026 Report Number: PDS-006-26 Authored by: David Perkins, Principal Planner, Community Planning Submitted By: Darryl Lyons, Deputy CAO, Planning and Infrastructure Services Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: Resolution Number: File Number: PLN 15.17 Report Subject: Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy Recommendation: 1. That Report PDS-006-26, and any related delegations or communication items, be received for information; 2. That staff be authorized to host a Public Information Centre in the Winter of 2026 regarding the draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy and continue finalizing the Clarington Waterfront Strategy as outlined; and, 3. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-006-26 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Page 9 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report PDS-006-26 Report Overview th 1. Introduction and Purpose 1.1 Clarington’s Lake Ontario shoreline is a diverse 34 km long expanse of beaches, bluffs and rocky outcrops that offer residents and visitors alike opportunities to enjoy the splendor of nature at its finest. In the next 30 years Clarington’s three lakeside communities of Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle are expected to experience growth, which will put pressure on the waterfront lands. 1.2 The draft Strategy (see Attachment 1) is a forward-thinking, long-term roadmap that outlines the Municipality of Clarington’s vision, goals and priorities of the future of Clarington’s waterfront. It is a high-level framework that will guide future decision making and resource allocation needed to implement the vision. The draft Strategy is not a document which focuses on short-term specific tasks, or which outlines ongoing administrative operational decisions. 1.3 The purpose of the draft Strategy is to weave together the varied waterfront landscapes and interests into a unified vision and provide a path forward to implement this vision which will guide the development of future amenities while protecting natural landscapes and processes across the entire Clarington waterfront over the next 30 years. 2. Background 2.1 The Clarington Waterfront Strategy was originally adopted in 1993, setting the foundation for how the 34-kilometre-long waterfront along the northern shore of Lake Ontario will be enjoyed and protected. Throughout the 1990’s and early 2000’s, significant progress was made to implement the original strategy including new policies being introduced and new development facilitating strategic land acquisition in the area. Page 10 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report PDS-006-26 2.2 In May 2022, Council authorized staff to finalize the project’s Terms of Reference (PDS- 026-22) to ensure appropriate focus and priority be given to the Bowmanville Harbourfront Waterfront area, while guiding the preparation of an updated comprehensive strategy that will set a long term plan and priorities for all of Clarington’s waterfront. 2.3 In early 2023, staff were directed to prioritize developing the Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan (PRCMP). The PRCMP was approved by Council in the fall of 2024 (CAO-007-24). It includes key considerations and one recommendation for the update to the Waterfront Strategy. 2.4 Input received through the PRCMP’s consultation process reinforced the importance of the Municipality’s waterfront areas. The waterfront was commonly identified as one of Clarington’s greatest natural assets that is enjoyed by both residents and regional visitors. Public input emphasized the need to preserve and enhance the strengths of the waterfront such as the open spaces and trails. The PRCMP noted that the Waterfront Strategy should consider the input received and the recommendations identified through the PRCMP, including enhancing amenities such as fitness equipment, playgrounds, seating, shade and other design elements, while promoting multi-use opportunities for all ages and protecting sensitive natural areas. Key priorities include improving trail connections, exploring event and cultural spaces, securing waterfront access, supporting local economic development, and implementing strategies to preserve environmental features. In May 2025, a Clarington Waterfront Strategy Update report PDS-024-25 was presented to the Planning and Development Committee. The update report introduced the draft Vision, Guiding Principles and Focus Areas to shape the future of Clarington’s waterfront. The report also outlined next steps including community engagement, preparing draft concepts for the Bowmanville and Newcastle Waterfronts, and to prepare and present the draft Strategy. The report also outlined key considerations and recommendation for the Waterfront Strategy from the PRCMP. 2.5 In October 2025, the What We Heard Report, (PDS-045-25) was presented to the Planning and Development Committee. 3. Community Engagement Consultation Process – Key Community Priorities 3.1 The Waterfront Strategy update process has included public engagement through multiple channels (survey, public open houses, signage along the waterfront and pop-up booths) over three phases. The first phase took place during the latter part of 2022, the second phase through the preparation of the PRCMP, and the third phase through a survey conducted during the summer of 2025. The highlights of the first two phases were outlined in Section 2 of the May 12, 2025 Clarington Waterfront Strategy Update staff report PDS-024-25. The survey results were reported to Council through the ‘What We Heard’ report PDS-045-25 in October 2025. Page 11 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PDS-006-26 3.2 The Summer 2025 survey was conducted to collect feedback on the draft Waterfront Vision, Guiding Principles and Five Distinct Experiences and the key themes including the need to preserve nature and heritage, ensure equitable and inclusive public spaces, avoid privatization, engage Indigenous communities, and plan realistically for infrastructure and growth. In addition to the survey, the public also had the option to email their feedback. 3.3 602 survey responses were received and they consistently prioritized environmental protection and community benefits, maintaining public access and avoiding over commercialization. Many of the respondents supported a vision that enhances quality of life through sustainable growth, while expressing concerns about overdevelopment and the loss of natural and community character. 3.4 Received feedback has informed revisions to the Waterfront Vision, Guiding Principles and Five Distinct Experiences in the draft Strategy and are discussed in more detail in Section 4 below. 3.5 Subject to Council direction, further community engagement is being planned for Winter 2026 including a survey and an Open House/Public Information Centre which will seek input from the community and key stakeholders regarding the draft Strategy. 3.6 When the project was initiated in 2022, the Williams Treaty First Nations and other Indigenous communities were provided information about the Waterfront Strategy initiative. When the project restarted in 2025 the same groups were again contacted. Staff provided them with a short summary and advised that they would be provided with a copy of the draft Strategy for engagement following presentation to Council. 3.7 The draft Strategy will be provided to the Williams Treaty First Nations and other Indigenous communities following presentation of the draft Waterfront Strategy to Council. 3.8 In addition, the Municipality is currently collaborating with the other lower-tier municipalities in Durham Region to create an Indigenous Engagement Guide for Durham Region area municipalities, informed by Durham Region’s Braiding Pathways framework and upcoming engagement with the Williams Treaty First Nations and other Indigenous Peoples. The above noted Indigenous Engagement Guide may inform further engagement actions. 4. Vision, Guiding Principles, and Distinct Experiences 4.1 Based on the results of public engagement, feedback from Staff and from technical analysis to date, the following is a summary of the revisions to the Draft Vision, Guiding Principles, and the Five Distinct Experiences. Page 12 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report PDS-006-26 The Draft Waterfront Vision 4.2 The Vision has been revised based on input from the online survey, resulting in less emphasis being placed on land development due to concerns expressed regarding the environmental impact of overdevelopment and related issues such as traffic, parkin g, noise and crowding as well as access and infrastructure constraints. 4.3 The Vision has also been revised based on input from members of the Waterfront Steering Committee, resulting in a stronger emphasis on the protection of natural systems and design excellence which addresses natural hazards such as erosion and flooding as well as climate change. The revised Vision is below: “Clarington's waterfront is a publicly accessible space that connects our community; protects natural systems, climate resilience and biodiversity; and honours our history and cultural heritage. Our shoreline flourishes with interconnected trails and diverse recreational opportunities while placing environmental stewardship at the forefront. We grow our waterfront sustainably protecting the important coastal functions and landscapes, while also ensuring public safety and accessibility over time.” 4.4 This input reinforced the idea that the waterfront connects our community and that there should be opportunities for the public to access and enjoy the waterfront through trails, connected spaces and services while also protecting the natural environment. The Guiding Principles 4.5 To support the Waterfront Vision, five guiding principles were developed to establish a framework and set priorities for future decisions. As a result of input, one additional guiding principle ‘Cultural Histories and Traditions’ was added. Additions and refinements to each of the other guiding principles were made and are detailed below. 4.6 Based on input from the public and the Waterfront Steering Committee members, Climate Resilience was added as a theme to the Environmental Stewardship guiding principle, with added wording addressing natural hazards, climate change and biodiversity. supported the principles overall, with small changes to the wording emphasizing the protection of biodiversity. 4.7 Revisions were made to the Public Access, Connection and Enjoyment guiding principle recognizing public ownership of the waterfront as a priority, as well as ecological connectivity and public trail connections as a result of input from stakeholders. 4.8 The additional guiding principle Cultural Histories and Traditions was added to address input to emphasize the importance of engaging Indigenous Peoples, and to not only recognize and protect cultural heritage, but to celebrate it. 4.9 Economic Viability was revised to ‘Community Scaled Economic Viability’ based on input from the public, including avoiding over-commercialization and strongly preferring small-scale, locally owned businesses that complement the public uses on the waterfront. Page 13 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report PDS-006-26 4.10 Design Excellence and Cultural Heritage Preservation was revised to Design Excellence and Community Centred Planning based on input from the public identifying the importance of meaningful resident involvement in future planning and decision - making processes. Cultural Heritage Preservation was included in the new theme Cultural Histories and Traditions The Guiding Principles are: “Environmental Stewardship and Climate Resilience: Protect, restore, and enhance the natural environment, including the Lake Ontario shoreline, wetlands, and wildlife habitats, while actively planning for flood and erosion hazards, climate change adaptation and protecting biodiversity. Public Access, Connection and Enjoyment: Ensure equitable, safe, and inclusive access to the waterfront for all residents and visitors, prioritizing public ownership and enjoyment of shoreline lands, recognizing the waterfront as a continuous and integrated corridor that supports ecological connectivity, including wildlife movement and sediment transport along the nearshore, and enhances public trail connections and natural spaces. Cultural Histories and Traditions: Celebrate the layered cultural histories and traditions on the waterfront lands, creating a culture of inclusiveness and belonging, and through the historic interpretation of public spaces through design and local stori es. Community-Scaled Economic Viability: Foster a sustainable waterfront economy that supports small-scale local businesses, creates employment opportunities for the community, and encourages tourism that complements the natural environment and enhances public enjoyment. Design Excellence and Community-Centred Planning: Create high-quality and impactful public and private realms through thoughtful, sustainable design that reflects the local character and is guided by transparent and meaningful community engagement.” The Five Distinct Experiences 4.11 Five distinct waterfront destinations, linked by the Great Lakes Waterfront Trail, offer a diverse range of experiences that reflect the revised Vision and Guiding Principles. Based on input from the survey and emails from the public as well as from the Waterfront Steering Committee members, the amenities proposed for the Courtice Waterfront Park, the Bowmanville Waterfront, the Newcastle Waterfront and the Agricultural Heritage area were revised. The proposed park designs are long term concepts that will need to be evaluated through a more detailed design and budgeting process. Construction is intended to be phased and will be subject to available funding. Proposed connections to existing trails to the north will link the Waterfront Trail to the Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle communities. Page 14 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report PDS-006-26 Courtice Waterfront Park 4.12 The Courtice Waterfront Park experience is envisioned as a public vibrant, family- friendly destination where residents and visitors can enjoy nature, recreation and connect to the community. With its scenic waterfront setting and integrated trail network, the park is designed to support a large range of passive and active uses – from walking and cycling to picnicking and educational exploration to kayaking and canoeing via access to Lake Ontario near the eastern end of the park. See Figure 1. 4.13 The development of this waterfront park will provide needed amenities for a rapidly growing population across Clarington. Connection to the broader trail networks will improve accessibility and recreation opportunities. 4.14 Based on feedback received from the public, commercial/mixed uses were shifted to lands north of the park as part of the Courtice Waterfront Secondary Plan. The design of the park was modified with a stronger emphasis on the planned waterfront park with its various amenities. Please refer to Figures 8, 9 and 10 in the attached draft Strategy (attachment 1) for more information regarding these amenities. Figure 1. Courtice Waterfront Park Concept Bowmanville Waterfront 4.15 The draft vision for the Bowmanville Waterfront continues to emphasize the protection and improvement of the environmentally sensitive landscapes and natural heritage areas, particularly the Westside Marsh. The vision also includes the improvement of recreational amenities in both West Beach and East Beach Parks, with a new pedestrian and bicycle friendly bridge connecting the two areas, which will also improve the Waterfront Trail experience. See Figure 2. 4.16 New amenities are planned to include a boardwalk, a playground, sport courts and a small building that could support water sport rentals, a boat launch, and a gathering/event space and stage, entrenching the Bowmanville destination as the anchor of the five waterfront experiences. Connections to existing amenities in the area such as the boat launch, dog park and the Conservation Area will be supported. Page 15 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report PDS-006-26 4.17 Based on feedback from the same stakeholders, a bridge connecting the West and East Beach areas for active transportation uses has been included in the concept. Please refer to Figures 11 and 12 in the attached Waterfront Strategy for more information regarding these amenities. Figure 2. Bowmanville Waterfront Concept. Newcastle Waterfront 4.18 Similar to Bowmanville, the draft vision for the Newcastle Waterfront includes two distinct areas. Lakebreeze Park and Bond Head Parkette. Lakebreeze Park is envisioned to include flexible park space and enhanced trails, while improving natural defenses against erosion and protecting and promoting biodiversity. 4.19 Due to considerable public concern expressed in the online survey, the vision to position Bond Head Parkette as a primary boat launch area has been removed. The existing boat launch area will remain, and enhanced vehicle and trailer parking is proposed. Please refer to Figures 13 and 14 in the attached draft Strategy (attachment 1) for more information regarding these amenities. Page 16 Municipality of Clarington Page 9 Report PDS-006-26 Figure 3 – Newcastle Waterfront Concept Agricultural Heritage Area 4.20 The lands along the waterfront between Newcastle and Port Granby are envisioned as an agricultural heritage area which will be celebrated with agri-tourism opportunities, continuing environmental stewardship and enhancing natural habitats while respecting erosion hazards. 4.21 Maintaining active agricultural operations while encouraging them to interact with the public preserves local traditions and supports local food production as well as public educational opportunities. It also enhances natural habitats, encouraging biodiversity and ecological resilience. 4.22 Based on input from the public and from the Steering Committee, the amenities in this area are proposed to include an enhanced Waterfront Trail and open spaces that are set back from the bluffs but provide intentional informal views of Lake Ontario, instead of access points to the shoreline Page 17 Municipality of Clarington Page 10 Report PDS-006-26 Port Granby Nature Reserve (PGNR) 4.23 The PGNR covers 175 hectares of land in the southeast corner of Clarington. Working in collaboration with local area residents, the Municipalities of Clarington, Port Hope and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority a proposal was prepared to create a nature reserve in the Port Granby area made up of the 175 hectares of surplu s Federal lands 4.24 The PGNR provides an opportunity for continuing environmental restoration while providing enhanced education and public access to this natural resource exists where residents and visitors can experience the beauty of a preserved natural ar ea including forests, meadows and wetlands through trails and minimal structures to minimize any adverse environmental impacts. 4.25 Strong support of the vision for the PGNR experience was received from the public, emphasizing the need for minimal impact to the natural environment. controlled access and the preservation of ecological integrity. 5. Implementation Plan 5.1 The 12 recommendations within the Implementation Plan section of the draft Strategy focus on sustainable waterfront planning through ecological and climate adaptation approaches, while promoting education, community engagement, and Indigenous participation. The recommendations prioritize phased implementation aligned with municipal strategic plans, multi-year budgeting, and asset management updates. 5.2 This section also includes 31 actions which implement the 12 recommendations. Key actions include enhancing and expanding the Great Lakes Waterfront Trail, securing long-term funding, conducting background studies, and adapting plans to climate impacts. Regular reviews every decade ensure alignment with evolving policies and successful outcomes. 5.3 Implementation of the Waterfront Strategy is divided into three phases, over a 30 -year time horizon, each with a specific focus and priority. The phases and timefram es for each are outlined below: Phase 1 - Foundational Steps (Years 1 – 5): This phase focuses on actions that set the groundwork for the Waterfront Strategy. Actions include planning for and completing ‘quick win’ projects, incorporating the Strategy into the Official Plan, undertaking feasibility studies, establishing a Waterfront Strategy Implementation team, fostering partnerships and facilitating education. Examples of ‘quick win’ projects could include trail extensions, basic amenities at lookouts to Lake Ontario, waterfront-specific wayfinding and signage, and planting and other naturalization initiatives . Page 18 Municipality of Clarington Page 11 Report PDS-006-26 Phase 2 - Keystone Initiatives (Years 6 – 15): This phase involves initiating major “keystone” projects and launching significant initiatives based on the foundational work from Phase 1, including the phased construction of all 3 of the urban waterfront parks. It also includes the development of the waterfront branding and tourism strategy. Phase 3 – Waterfront Legacy (Years 16 – 30+): This phase focuses on completing the long-term transformational projects that will define the waterfront’s legacy. This includes the fulsome connectivity of the Waterfront Trail including the pedestrian bridge connecting the east and west Bowmanville beach areas an d trails connecting it to the communities to the north, and the full build out of the five distinct experience destinations. 5.4 Please note that acquisition, carrying, maintenance and other types of operating costs, as well as some soft and contingency costs, are not fully considered in the approximate costs outlined in the draft Strategy. 6. Next Steps Community Engagement: 6.1 Building on the extensive community consultation already completed, staff will continue to engage with the community, key stakeholders and Indigenous communities. 6.2 A survey and an Open House/Public Information Centre are being planned to take place in Winter 2026 to gather information from the community on the draft Waterfront Strategy. Prepare and Present the Final Strategy: 6.3 Staff will consider input received from consultation on the draft Strategy and intend to bring a report with the final Waterfront Strategy to a future Planning and Development Committee meeting. 7. Financial Considerations 7.1 The Waterfront Strategy was funded by Council in 2022 through resolution #C-124-22 (FSD-020-22 and PDS-026-22. 7.2 Once the final Strategy is approved, staff will report back to Council with an action plan and any necessary funding for implementation . 8. Strategic Plan 8.1 G.3.3 Enhances Clarington’s Waterfront. The specific action identified to address this priority includes Completion of the Waterfront Strategy. Page 19 Municipality of Clarington Page 12 Report PDS-006-26 9. Climate Change 9.1 Sustainability and resilience have been identified as a cornerstone of waterfront planning and development. Sustainable development has been identified in the draft Vision and several of the draft Guiding Principles including Environmental Stewardship, Public Access and Enjoyment and Economic Viability. 9.2 A long-term commitment to sustainability with resilient infrastructure was identified as a priority for the waterfront. A recommended action in the Implementation Plan is to build sustainability and climate resiliency into the development of all the waterfront lands. This will be considered throughout the duration of the Implementation Plan. 10. Concurrence 10.1 Development of draft Waterfront Strategy includes staff from across the Corporation. 11. Conclusion 11.1 It is respectfully requested that the recommendations contained in this report be approved. Staff Contact: David Perkins, Principal Planner, Community Planning Division, 905-623-3379 ext. 2453 or dperkins@clarington.net; Lisa Backus, Manager, Community Planning Division, 905-623-3379 ext. 2413 or lbackus@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 – Draft Waterfront Strategy Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 20 December 2025 The Corporation of The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Strategy Draft DRA F T Attachment 1 to Report PDS-006-26 Page 21 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 1 DRA F T Page 22 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements Acronyms, Abbreviations, Definitions 1.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Document Structure ................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Policy Direction and Plans.......................................................................................... 5 1.2.1 Municipality of Clarington Waterfront Study and Land Use Strategy, 1993 ......... 5 1.2.2 Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 ................................................................... 6 1.2.3 Envision Durham: Regional Official Plan, 2024 ................................................... 6 1.2.4 Clarington Official Plan, 1996 (2024 Consolidation) ............................................ 7 1.2.5 Municipality of Clarington Strategic Plan 2024-2027 ........................................... 7 1.2.6 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan, 2024 ......................................... 8 1.2.7 Courtice Waterfront Secondary Plan (Draft), 2025 .............................................. 8 1.2.8 Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan, 2024............................................... 8 1.2.9 Clarington Transportation Master Plan, 2016 ...................................................... 9 1.2.10 Clarington Active Transportation Master Plan (in progress) ................................ 9 1.3 Engagement Highlights ............................................................................................ 10 2.0 Waterfront Lands Analysis ....................................................................................... 12 3.0 One Connected Waterfront, Five Distinct Experiences .......................................... 19 3.1 One Connected Waterfront ...................................................................................... 21 3.2 Guiding Principles .................................................................................................... 24 3.3 Five Distinct Experiences ......................................................................................... 25 3.3.1 Courtice Waterfront Experience......................................................................... 26 3.3.2 Bowmanville Waterfront Experience .................................................................. 37 3.3.3 Newcastle Waterfront Experience ..................................................................... 45 3.3.4 Agricultural Heritage Experience ....................................................................... 51 3.3.5 Port Granby Nature Reserve Experience .......................................................... 55 3.3.6 Waterfront Park Cost Estimates ........................................................................ 60 4.0 Implementation .......................................................................................................... 66 4.1 Implementation Plan ................................................................................................ 69 4.1.1 Phase 1: Foundational Recommendations (Present to 2030) ........................... 70 4.1.2 Phase 2: Keystone Initiatives (2030 to 2040) .................................................... 73 4.1.3 Phase 3: Waterfront Legacy (Beyond 2040) ...................................................... 75DRA F T Page 23 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | iii Figures Figure 1: Waterfront Lands Boundary .................................................................................. 3 Figure 2 Strategic Direction - Character Areas ................................................................... 15 Figure 3: Strategic Direction - Five Sub-Areas ................................................................... 16 Figure 4 Strategic Direction - Regional Wildlife Habitat Corridor ........................................ 17 Figure 5 Strategic Directions - Identity and Placemaking ................................................... 18 Figure 6: One Connected Waterfront, Five Distinct Experiences ....................................... 22 Figure 7 Courtice Waterfront Park Concept (Draft Courtice Waterfront Park Secondary Plan, 2025) ......................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 8 Courtice Waterfront Park Vision - West Area (Draft Courtice Waterfront Park Secondary Plan, 2025) ....................................................................................................... 30 Figure 9 Courtice Waterfront Park Vision - East Area (Draft Courtice Waterfront Park Secondary Plan, 2025) ....................................................................................................... 31 Figure 10 Courtice Waterfront Park Vision - Additional Potential Park to the North (Draft Courtice Waterfront Park Secondary Plan, 2025) ............................................................... 32 Figure 11: Bowmanville Waterfront Vision .......................................................................... 36 Figure 12: Bowmanville Parks Concept .............................................................................. 40 Figure 13: Newcastle Waterfront Concept .......................................................................... 44 Figure 14: Newcastle Waterfront Parks Concept................................................................ 48 Figure 15 Port Granby Lands ............................................................................................. 56 Figure 16: Illustrative Concept for Port Granby Nature Reserve, 2010 .............................. 59 Tables Table 1: Waterfront Lands Analysis Highlights ................................................................... 14 Table 2 Definitions for One Waterfront, Five Distinct Experiences Figure .......................... 23 Table 3 Courtice Waterfront Park Cost Estimate ................................................................ 63 Table 4 Bowmanville Waterfront Parks Cost Estimate ....................................................... 64 Table 5 Newcastle Waterfront Parks Cost Estimate ........................................................... 65 Table 6 Clarington Waterfront Strategy Implementation Phases ........................................ 67 Table 7: Phase 1 Implementation Categories and Actions ................................................. 70 Table 8 Phase 2 Implementation Categories and Actions .................................................. 73 Table 9 Phase 3 Implementation Categories and Actions .................................................. 75 Appendices Appendix A – Community Engagement Summaries Appendix B – Waterfront Lands AnalysisDRA F T Page 24 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | iv Acknowledgements Steering Committee Members Lisa Backus, Manager, Municipality of Clarington Alicia Da Silva, Planner, Municipality of Clarington Jamie Davidson, Director, Watershed Planning and Natural Heritage, Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Cory Harris, Watershed Services Coordinator, Ganaraska Conservation Sylvia Jennings, Planner, Municipality of Clarington Andrei Micu, Parks Design and Development Manager, Municipality of Clarington Sarem Nejad, Development Planner, Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Mariano Perini, Director of Public Works and Fire Chief, Municipality of Clarington David Perkins, Principal Planner, Municipality of Clarington Jennifer Smith, Manager of Parks Services, Municipality of Clarington Municipality of Clarington Kaitlin Keefer, Communications Officer Melissa Westover, Communications Manager Leanne Walker, Supervisor, Marketing and Engagement Consulting Team Jaysen Ariola, Landscape Architect, Dillon Consulting Limited Evelyn Babalis, Landscape Planner, Dillon Consulting Limited Martina Braunstein, Project Lead and Urban Designer, Dillon Consulting Limited Ian Dance, Landscape Architect, Dillon Consulting Limited Amy Greenberg, Project Coordinator and Planner, Dillon Consulting Limited Paddy Kennedy, Project Advisor and Planner, Dillon Consulting Limited Kristin Lillyman, Engagement Specialist, Dillon Consulting Limited Paolo Mazza, Geographic Information System Specialist, Dillon Consulting Limited Eha Naylor, Landscape Architect, Dillon Consulting Limited Peter Thoma, Economic and Market Analyst, urbanMetricsDRA F T Page 25 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | v Acronyms, Abbreviations, Definitions AMP Asset Management Plan ATMP Active Transportation Master Plan CLOCA Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority COP Clarington Official Plan GRCA Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority MNRF Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry POPS Privately-owned publicly accessible spaces PPS Provincial Planning Statement PRC Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan ROP Regional Official Plan SMP Shoreline Management Plan SWOT Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats TMP Transportation Master Plan DRA F T Page 26 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 1 1.0 IntroductionDRA F T Page 27 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 2 Where Clarington meets Lake Ontario, a 34-kilometre shoreline unfolds as a living, thriving waterfront area with a shared legacy. Valued by Indigenous communities, residents, visitors, and regional biodiverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, it is among the most natural waterfronts along Lake Ontario’s shoreline. More than half of the waterfront lands fall within the Greenbelt’s Protected Countryside and Urban River Valleys, complemented by provincial parkland, protected natural heritage features, and open spaces. Clarington’s shoreline also carries deep Indigenous histories and long-standing ties to agriculture, port and rail activity, and industry—roots that have evolved into today’s advanced manufacturing and energy sectors. As waterfront places like Courtice, Bowmanville, and Newcastle provide for planned growth and guided change, the immanent public access and ecological biodiversity at the water’s edge shape the next chapter of Clarington’s waterfront. The exchange of knowledges and perspectives, and partnerships between the Municipality, interest groups, industries, public, First Nations and Indigenous communities, neighbouring municipalities, the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) are critical drivers in the creation of a more resilient lake’s edge. The purpose of the Clarington Waterfront Strategy (Strategy) is to weave all valued components that shape the waterfront lands into a unified vision guiding future enhancements, parks and recreation, culture, tourism, environmental protection, policy and land development along Clarington’s shoreline for the next 30 years. The Strategy builds on the ecosystem approach to land use planning established in the Municipality’s 1993 Waterfront Study and Land Use Strategy with current planning context, priorities, best practices and community values. Land Acknowledgement The Municipality of Clarington is situated within the traditional and treaty territory of the Mississaugas and Chippewas of the Anishinabeg, known today as the Williams Treaties First Nations. Our work on these lands acknowledges their resilience and their longstanding contributions to the area now known as the Municipality of Clarington. DRA F T Page 28 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 3 Figure 1: Waterfront Lands Boundary DRA F T Page 29 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 4 Figure 1 illustrates the waterfront lands boundary for the Strategy - they are generally located south of Highway 401, spanning the full west to east length of the municipal boundary along Lake Ontario’s shoreline. The urban area boundaries - as set in the Municipalities land use policies - Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle extend south to the lake, as outlined below in white. 1.1 Document Structure This document is organized into four key sections. Section 1.0 Introduction frames the purpose and scope, outlines policy direction across provincial, regional, and municipal plans, and summarizes engagement highlights. Section 2.0 Waterfront Lands Analysis documents current conditions, opportunities, and constraints along the shoreline to ground the vision in evidence. Section 3.0 One Connected Waterfront, Five Distinct Experiences sets the overarching vision and guiding principles, then provides place-specific directions for Courtice, Bowmanville, Newcastle, Agricultural Heritage, and the Port Granby Nature Reserve, along with high-level cost estimates. Section 4.0 Implementation translates the vision into a phased action plan—Foundational (present–2030), Keystone (2030–2040), and Legacy (beyond 2040)—to guide delivery, partnerships, and priorities. The following sections provide a high-level overview of the policy framework and engagement completed to date.Section 1.2 synthesizes the direction from provincial, regional, and municipal plans that shape waterfront development and conservation in Clarington.Section 1.3 highlights critical feedback and priorities from residents and stakeholders that directly informed the Strategy’s key directions, vision and experiences.DRA F T Page 30 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 5 1.2 Policy Direction and Plans The Strategy is informed by a comprehensive framework of existing policies, plans, and strategies at the provincial, regional, and municipal levels. These documents help establish the legislative basis and strategic direction for land use planning, environmental protection, community development, and public investment along the waterfront. To understand this direction, the following key documents were reviewed directly shaping the vision, principles, and recommendations of the Strategy. Courtice Waterfront Secondary Plan (2025 Draft) Parks, Recreation, and Culture Master Plan (2024), including its Five-Year Action Plan (Report CAO-015-25, September 2025) and implementation strategy (Attachment 1 to Report CAO 015-25) Clarington Official Plan, 1996 (2024 Consolidation) Envision Durham: Regional Official Plan (2024) Municipality of Clarington Strategic Plan 2024-2027 Provincial Planning Statement (2024) Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan (2024) Clarington Transportation Master Plan (2016) Municipality of Clarington Waterfront Study and Land Use Strategy (1993) Other background documents reviewed in the development of the Strategy, include: Draft Lake Ontario Shoreline Hazard Summary, Risk Assessment and Management Plan (2022) Corporate Climate Action Plan (2021) Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan (2020) Port Darlington Shore Protection Concepts (2018) Draft Proposed Port Darlington (West Shore) Shoreline Management Report (2018) Shoreline Terrestrial Features Background Report for the GRCA Watershed Portion of Clarington (2018) Port Granby Nature Reserve: Realizing the Vision (2015) Port Darlington Neighbourhood Secondary Plan (2014) Bowmanville and Westside Marshes Conservation Area Management Plan (2006) Port Darlington Secondary Planning Area Implementation Strategy (1992) 1.2.1 Municipality of Clarington Waterfront Study and Land Use Strategy, 1993 This foundational document established the first comprehensive, long-term vision for Clarington’s waterfront, introducing key principles that continue to guide its management. DRA F T Page 31 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 6 The Strategy is built on this strategic document by: Carrying forward the "ecosystem approach" to land use planning as one of the core key directions and informing the new Environmental Stewardship and Climate Resilience Guiding Principle; Carrying forward and adapting the waterfront character sub-areas, waterfront greenway, waterfront places and principles to form the new Vision and Guiding Principles; Assessing the successes of this strategic document, and updating the planning context, priorities and community needs; and, Establishing the implementation plan for the next 30 years. 1.2.2 Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 The 2024 Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) provides overall policy direction on matters of provincial interest in land use planning. As the primary provincial planning document, all municipal strategies must be consistent with its direction. The PPS provides the foundational direction for the Strategy, reflecting its mandates by: Prioritizing resilient design and directing development away from hazardous lands, particularly shorelines susceptible to flooding, erosion, and dynamic beach hazards, which is critical for building long-term resilience - this is a cornerstone of the Strategy’s ‘Environmental Stewardship and Climate Resilience’ Guiding Principle; Strengthening the protection of natural heritage features and areas for the long term, including significant wetlands and bluffs, through the Strategy’s overall ecologically based approach and specifically for the West Beach Area; Mirroring the promotion of healthy, active communities through the ‘Public Access, Connection, and Enjoyment’ Guiding Principle, which champions a continuous and accessible public shoreline (e.g., parks, open spaces, and trails); and, Incorporating climate change resilience as a core Guiding Principle for ‘Environmental Stewardship and Climate Resilience’, and recommendations for green infrastructure and adaptive management. 1.2.3 Envision Durham: Regional Official Plan, 2024 The 2024 Regional Official Plan (ROP) sets the broad, high-level vision for growth, land use, and environmental protection across Durham Region. With the Region’s transition to an upper-tier municipality without planning responsibilities, Clarington is now empowered to integrate these regional objectives directly into its local vision. DRA F T Page 32 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 7 The ROP provides the regional direction and context for the Strategy by: Envisioning Clarington’s ‘Waterfront Areas’ as accessible lake fronting experiences within a biodiverse ecological system; Supporting development at the waterfront in Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle as envisioned through the waterfront park concepts in the Strategy; Supporting the ongoing development of a continuous waterfront trail and connectivity into the regional-wide trail system, as envisioned through all visionary concepts for the Strategy. 1.2.4 Clarington Official Plan, 1996 (2024 Consolidation) The Clarington Official Plan (COP) is the Municipality's primary tool for managing growth and land use. It translates the broad principles of foundational documents, like the 1993 Waterfront Study and Land Use Strategy, into specific land use designations and policies that guide the Strategy. The COP provides the most current local planning framework. The Strategy builds on the COP’s framework by: Carrying forward the foundational concepts from the 1993 Waterfront Study and Land Use Strategy, particularly the ‘Waterfront Greenway’ and ‘Waterfront Places’, through the Strategy’s Vision; Reinforcing high-quality, mixed-use urban environments for the waterfront communities of Courtice, Bowmanville (Port Darlington) and Newcastle (Port of Newcastle) through the Strategy’s Vision; Adopting the COP’s key objectives to shape the Strategy’s Vision and Guiding Principles, such that the Strategy's recommendations deliver a waterfront that is clean, green, connected, open, accessible, useable, diverse, and attractive; and, Prioritizing the long-term objective of a continuous waterfront trail and the protection of the Lake Ontario waterfront as an important ecological and cultural heritage landscape. 1.2.5 Municipality of Clarington Strategic Plan 2024-2027 This is the Municipality's highest-level guiding document, outlining Council's priorities and linking them directly to the municipal budget and action plans.DRA F T Page 33 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 8 This plan gives the Strategy its direct mandate and ensures its recommendations are aligned with Council's top priorities by: Fulfilling the explicit corporate priority to complete Strategy, and providing the actionable recommendations to begin implementation; Reinforcing Council’s vision for a "resilient, sustainable, and complete community" through the Strategy’s Guiding Principles; and, Aligning the Strategy with a sustainable financial framework for implementation that meets the Council’s commitment to strategic investment in municipal assets. 1.2.6 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan, 2024 The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan guides the development of a new community directly north of the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. This secondary plan provides a framework for land use, environmental protection, and connectivity that will directly interface with and support the broader waterfront vision. The Strategy considers this plan by: Envisioning the future growth and vibrancy of the neighbourhood, as well as connectivity to the Waterfront Trail. 1.2.7 Courtice Waterfront Secondary Plan (Draft), 2025 The Courtice Waterfront Secondary Plan provides the detailed planning framework for the municipally owned lands along the waterfront that are adjacent to Darlington Provincial Park, setting the stage for a major new park and community. Key takeaways for the Strategy are to: Adopting its vision for a mixed-use area and complete waterfront community; Incorporating the new municipal-wide park as a cornerstone of the entire Strategy, by positioning it as a regional destination with a range of year-round recreational and cultural amenities; and, Helping ensure that recommendations for this area are fully aligned, by creating a single, unified vision for the future of the Courtice waterfront. 1.2.8 Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan, 2024 The Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan (PRC Master Plan) provides a comprehensive, long-term (15-year) vision for the future of Clarington’s parks, trails, recreation facilities, and cultural services. It is a foundational document for the Strategy, DRA F T Page 34 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 9 providing recommendations for short, medium, and long-term actions for Clarington’s waterfront. The Council endorsed a specific 5-Year Action Plan (Report CAO-015-25) that details the short-term priorities (2024 to 2028), their financial implications, and the staff resources required to implement them. The Strategy is built on the PRC Master Plan findings by: Integrating the key recommendations for the waterfront (e.g., preserving sensitive areas, enhancing passive recreation and access, and adding amenities) into Vision, Guiding Principles and concepts; Implementing the recommended investments, such as public feedback as a clear mandate for the Strategy's recommended investments; and, Providing event space, picnic areas, outdoor fitness equipment, and non-motorized watercraft launches in waterfront park concepts. 1.2.9 Clarington Transportation Master Plan, 2016 The Clarington Transportation Master Plan (TMP) provides a comprehensive assessment of the Municipality's long-term (to 2031) transportation system needs across all modes, aiming to guide decisions amidst significant anticipated growth. The Strategy's recommendations for connectivity are informed by the TMP by: Proposing an interconnected trail system, including the 'Circle of Green' concept, that links to the key north-south corridors identified in the TMP (e.g., Nash Road and Baseline Road); and, Aligning its destination hubs, such as the Bowmanville Waterfront, with the planned GO Rail extension to improve transit accessibility. 1.2.10 Clarington Active Transportation Master Plan (in progress) The Active Transportation Master Plan (ATMP) is being developed concurrently with the Strategy, sharing aspirations for a resilient and sustainable community, a safe and connected network, and inclusive, accessible and vibrant communities. Key takeaways will be incorporated into the final Strategy.DRA F T Page 35 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 10 1.3 Engagement Highlights In providing fair, balanced and ongoing engagement opportunities, the Municipality deployed a variety of tactics to inform, educate and engage residents, environmental authorities and interested groups about the Strategy. The community’s values and priorities were received over multiple phases of the project and build upon prior feedback over time. Additionally, as part of Clarington’s commitment to strengthen Indigenous partnerships, First Nations communities have been invited to learn about the project and provide feedback through dedicated outreach to help shape the Strategy. Initial engagement, conducted in 2022, included a vision intercept survey, community pop- ups, and meetings with Councillors and stakeholders to introduce the project and gain early insights into the waterfront vision and needs. This was complemented by public consultation on the waterfront lands for the PRC Master Plan where the waterfront was identified as the top priority for facility investment (e.g., open space, parks, trails) with 85 percent of survey respondents supporting waterfront improvements. Early feedback indicated that the waterfront is a highly valued asset in Clarington, and that creating a connected, accessible, and active waterfront with a focus on environmental protection was important to the community. In 2025, a robust engagement process was undertaken to ensure the community had meaningful opportunities to learn about and shape the draft Vision, Guiding Principles, and concepts that inform the Strategy. DRA F T Page 36 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 11 The key emerging themes from all stages of engagement informing the development of the Strategy are as follows (note: not listed by any hierarchy or priority): Strong Public Support for Investment:The waterfront is highly valued, with strong public support for continued recreation and community use investment in parks, water play, family-friendly amenities, music venues and gathering spaces. Environmental Protection is the Top Priority:Protecting and enhancing the biodiversity, natural habitats, and shoreline integrity received strong support. An Accessible & Connected Waterfront for All:There is clear enthusiasm to build a continuous waterfront and trail network that is safe, inclusive, and barrier- free for people of all ages and abilities. Community-Focused, All-Season Recreation:The community desires family- friendly, low-impact, and year-round recreational activities that respect the waterfront's natural character and well-established communities. A Scaled Approach to Economic Activity:Support is for small-scale, local businesses (e.g., cafés, markets), with strong opposition to large-scale commercial or residential development. Infrastructure Must Match Growth:Providing adequate infrastructure— including parking, public transit, and washrooms—to support increased use of the waterfront. Preserve the Unique Character and Heritage of the Waterfront:A tailored, site-specific approach is required to address local community needs and concerns, while maintaining the waterfront’s peaceful character and protecting the site’s cultural and Indigenous histories. Community priorities call for a nature-first approach that avoids over commercialization and safeguards sensitive ecosystems; a people-centered waterfront that prioritizes inclusive, accessible public spaces; and a long-term commitment to sustainability, with resilient infrastructure and active stewardship to benefit future generations. For a fulsome summary of ‘what we heard’ through engagement, please refer to Appendix A. Additional public engagement will be rolled out following the presentation to Clarington Council in early 2026. The feedback from this future engagement will inform the final Strategy. DRA F T Page 37 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 12 2.0 Waterfront Lands AnalysisDRA F T Page 38 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 13 Over the last 30 years, the Municipality led the implementation of the 1993 Waterfront Study and Land Use Strategy through the establishment and implementation of COP policies and land use planning decisions, increasing Municipal land ownership and waterfront access through the land acquisition strategy, and partnerships with CLOCA and GRCA to protect the natural heritage system and Lake Ontario shoreline. Further, the Municipality led the planning and development of waterfront parks and communities, vehicular and active transportation improvements for the overall connectivity of and to the waterfront. These remarkable outcomes highlight the Municipality’s leadership and investment in advancing a connected and accessible waterfront. In preparing the Strategy, it was important to use a framework to simply organize and communicate complex information gathered from the background documents and waterfront lands analysis that spans over a 34 kilometres shoreline – it is referred to as Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis. The SWOT analysis offers a focused understanding of the current conditions enabling informed decisions on the future direction for Clarington’s waterfront lands - key feature and vital public resource. The SWOT was completed at the onset of the project, in 2022, in concert with the background document review, mapping, and an assessment of the economic opportunities. Table 1 provides key highlights of the analysis - the detailed SWOT analysis and economic opportunities assessment are included in Appendix B. In completing the SWOT and analysis diagrams of Clarington’s waterfront lands (see Appendix B), four key strategic directions emerged, as shown in Figure 2,Figure 3, Figure 4, and Figure 5, describing Clarington’s unique context along Lake Ontario and acting as the impetus for the Vision in Section 3.0. DRA F T Page 39 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 14 Table 1: Waterfront Lands Analysis Highlights STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES OPPORTUNITIES THREATS  Incremental public waterfront access since 1993.  Strong policies on environmental protection new development directed away from areas of natural or human-made hazards.  Diverse existing uses.  Courtice Waterfront and Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood secondary plans, with sustainable design guidance.  Well established water, storm sewer and sanitary sewer networks within Bowmanville and Newcastle urbanized areas. Sanitary sewers located near or through public lands.  Home to many natural heritage features and hydrologically sensitive features, as well as endangered species and threatened species.  Established coastal hazard mapping, summaries and recommendations.  Highway 401 and railways as physical barriers separating terrestrial and waterfront ecosystems, as well as vehicular and active transportation routes.  Irregular access to amenity spaces enhancing the user experience (e.g., signage, seating, shade, washroom facilities, etc.).  Limited natural land cover within two kilometres of shoreline, with agriculture as the dominant land use within the GRCA watershed.  Transit service gaps.  Existing shoreline development located within hazardous areas coastal hazard works due to greater risk for flooding, erosion and unstable slopes  Lack of urban design guidance and heritage protection Port of Newcastle.  Limited public access due to private ownership (i.e. community, agriculture, etc.), utility and large industrial lands.  Bowmanville Creek and Graham Creek channels infilling, limited navigability for boating.  Future GO Stations and expanded transit services to Bowmanville waterfront.  Acquisition of additional lands to protect sensitive areas, ecological approach to shore protection.  Focused public realm improvements around established waterfront places and future growth areas including cultural heritage landscape protection.  Established scalable commercial villages in Bowmanville and Courtice.  Additional waterfront amenities, commercial incubators, improved seasonal experience, tourism, placemaking and accessibility.  Integrated and shared marina use with municipal wide parks, and more suitable boat locations.  Increased public access to ecological, cultural and recreational areas.  Improved trail linkages, hydro-corridor connections, off-road Waterfront Trail links, including cycling infrastructure.  Expansion of open space system, restoration and increase of natural habitat in Port Granby Nature Reserve.  Increasing ‘green’ land cover, sustainable development features, management of invasive species, etc. to improve the ecological integrity of the Regional wildlife habitat corridor (2 km) and coastal habitat.  Reflected history, traditions, stories and heritage on public lands.  Use of sediment that is hydraulically dredged from navigational channels to nourish sediment supply on beaches.  Climate change impacts - warmer water can lead to increase in winds which leads to an increase in wave action, impacting coastal vegetation communities, erosion to bluffs and sensitive bluff vegetation and animal life.  Undesirable crossings across Highway 401.  Privatization of shoreline access (physical and visual) and population growth’s recreational demand on the waterfront lands.  Existing shoreline development located within hazardous areas and the risk is greater for: low lying areas more vulnerable to flooding, and development on bluffs are more vulnerable to erosion and slope stability issues.  Shoreline hardening (i.e., etc.) and sediment deficit in some beaches.  Continual swings in high and low lake levels observed to continue, potentially impacting increased flood and erosion risks (e.g., decreased ice cover which exposes the shoreline to more winter storms, more intense storms and higher storm surges).  Higher 100-year flood elevation, shoreline bluffs and beaches eroding (e.g., average annualized recession rate in portions of the waterfront lands can be as high as 0.6 metre of erosion/top of bluff loss per year along the Bond Head bluffs as per the 2020 Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan (Lake Ontario SMP).  Proximity of trail system to the eroding beach and bluff shorelines, requiring abandonment should erosion threaten the existing trail.  Rider safety without road shoulders to provide buffer.  Failing infrastructure, structural and property damage.  Cost of implementation.DRA F T Page 40 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 15 Figure 2 Strategic Direction - Character Areas Figure 2 illustrates two primary character areas along Clarington’s waterfront as urban and countryside, with unique physical and regulatory requirements. The ‘urban interface area’ recognizes the urban context, significant natural heritage features and diverse land uses, linking to the communities of Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle north of Highway 401 and offering direct lake access near historic harbours. The ‘countryside interface area’ recognizes the predominantly agricultural land use of the area, natural heritage features, steeper slopes, and the ‘Protected Countryside’ Greenbelt Planning Area designation.DRA F T Page 41 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 16 Figure 3: Strategic Direction - Five Sub-Areas Figure 3 illustrates the updated 1993 Waterfront Study and Land Use Strategy landscape sub- areas - they provide a simplified visual reference for the landscape sub-area characterization of Clarington’s waterfront based on common land uses, policies and environmental characteristics. The five landscape sub-areas provide insights into the diverse uses of the waterfront lands, such as the vast area for conservation lands and resiliency nodes which support the natural shoreline functions. Figure 3 figure also highlights the existing landscape-based sub-areas that reflect the large areas for industrial and residential uses. Collectively the sub-areas provide an important ecological corridor, although each sub-area requires a distinct ecologically based approach towards climate resilience with which to inform the Strategy.DRA F T Page 42 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 17 Figure 4 Strategic Direction - Regional Wildlife Habitat Corridor Figure 4 illustrates Clarington waterfront’s regional wildlife habitat corridor, which encompasses the two-kilometre coastal buffer that functions as both the east-west and north-south natural corridor. It also provides critical staging, breeding, movement and habitat types for both aquatic and terrestrial communities. In Clarington, this constitutes a high level of biodiversity and complex ecological functions within the concentrated area. (e.g., the dynamic barrier beaches, coastal dune and bluff communities, etc.). The regional wildlife habitat corridor informs the strategic direction for Clarington’s waterfront as an essential protection of the terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity and habitat.DRA F T Page 43 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 18 Figure 5 Strategic Directions - Identity and Placemaking Figure 5 provides a simplified illustration of the existing and potential identity and placemaking nodes that unify Clarington’s 34-kilometre shoreline. The nodes consist of geographically clustered amenities and landscape features that highlight aspects of historic identity, community well-being, enjoyment of public space, pride and stewardship, investment and tourism opportunities. The strategic connection of the Waterfront Trail across Clarington’s waterfront destinations connects urban boundaries, publicly owned lands, and natural heritage areas to create a distinct, comprehensive shoreline identity, while also embracing a series of experiences along the Lake Ontario shoreline. In conclusion, the four strategic directions work together as a collective blueprint, illustrating the framework to create a unified and resilient waterfront through this Strategy. The two character areas, five landscape sub-areas and regional wildlife habitat corridor focus on the classifications of land through use and function, while also weaving clusters of waterfront activities. The multi- layered direction reflects the complex urban, natural and social systems that guide the development of Clarington’s overall Strategy Vision.DRA F T Page 44 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 19 3.0 One Connected Waterfront, Five Distinct ExperiencesDRA F T Page 45 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 20 The overall Vision emerged from four strategic directions that were formed through the synthesis of policy, community feedback and analysis findings presented in Sections 1.0 and 2.0. As a strategic diagrammatic Vision,Figure 6 illustrates the convergence of the four strategic directions into One Connected Waterfront, Five Distinct Experiences. The following sections offer a detailed description of the key components of this Vision.Section 3.1 provides a detailed description for the ‘One Connected Waterfront’ aspect of Clarington’s Vision, as well as ecological and adaptation planning approaches.Section 3.2 presents the five (5) Guiding Principles for the implementation of the Strategy, and Section 3.3 outlines the five (5) distinct experiences in Clarington, including visionary concepts. One Connected Waterfront, Five Distinct Experiences Courtice Waterfront | Bowmanville Waterfront | Newcastle Waterfront | Agricultural Heritage | Port Granby Nature Reserve Clarington's waterfront is a publicly accessible space that connects our community; protects natural systems, climate resilience and biodiversity; and honours our history and cultural heritage. Our shoreline flourishes with interconnected trails and diverse recreational opportunities while placing environmental stewardship at the forefront. We grow our waterfront sustainably protecting the important coastal functions and landscapes, while also ensuring public safety and accessibility over time. DRA F T Page 46 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 21 3.1 One Connected Waterfront Clarington’s waterfront lands will provide a continuous biodiversity and people movement corridor, in congruence with adjacent geographic boundaries and features. The connected waterfront will link people and places with a unified and accessible road and active transportation network, while also supporting wildlife movement, natural coastal processes (e.g., sediment transport), and ecological and biodiverse systems. ‘One Connected Waterfront’ will be established through ecological and adaptation-based approaches to land use planning and land management, in recognition of Clarington’s high shoreline erosion and flooding risks. The approaches, outlined below, will lead future decision making in the next 30 years, aligning with the 2020 Lake Ontario SMP. Avoid development within the hazard areas while also acknowledging the community desire to access the shoreline. This reduces exposure by ensuring that new development does not occur on hazardous land, recognizing that vulnerability to coastal hazards can also be significant for legacy developments. Development setbacks for erosion and flooding embrace the principles of ‘avoid’ and are based on a 100-year planning horizon, as per PPS. Adopting a longer planning horizon would increase the longevity of the “avoid” strategy and the overall resilience of the shoreline. Accommodate allows for continued occupation of coastal properties while changes to human activities or infrastructure are made to reduce coastal hazards and vulnerability. For example, raising the foundation of a flood-prone building will reduce vulnerability and may enable continued occupation of the site. In general, this applies to existing development, not proposed development. Retreat decision to withdraw or relocate assets exposed to coastal hazards when the costs to accommodate or protect are either not affordable, fail to produce a positive benefit-cost ratio, fail to adequately reduce the risk, or are not permitted due to regulations or legislation. For this approach to be successful, voluntary property acquisition programs with participation and contributions from senior levels of government may be required. Protect people, property, and infrastructure as the traditional approach used in the Great Lakes and often the first considered. For example, use of grey infrastructure (i.e., armour stone revetments and seawalls, and nature-based solutions such as building coastal dunes, planting vegetation or nourishing beaches). For this strategy to be successful it must be shown that the site-specific risks can be effectively mitigated for the duration of the planning horizon, as per the PPS. This is costly and should be the last option to be considered if other strategies cannot be met. DRA F T Page 47 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 22 Figure 6: One Connected Waterfront, Five Distinct Experiences Experience DRA F T Page 48 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 23 Table 2 Definitions for One Waterfront, Five Distinct Experiences Figure Legend Reference Definition Resiliency Nodes Areas prone to flooding due to their environmental characteristics such as ravines, marshes and Lake Ontario’s shoreline - they support important aquatic and terrestrial will require special consideration for habitat protection, infrastructure upgrades and development buffers. Waterfront Spaces Both private and publicly owned lands along the waterfront for residential, commercial and amenity areas, such as parks and open spaces. Natural Areas Areas that feature natural heritage features, such as the Darlington Provincial Park, Bowmanville Westside Conservation Area, Samuel Wilmot Nature Areas and the proposed Port Granby Nature Reserve. Agricultural Lands Lands characterized by their existing agricultural land uses as well as their relationship with the Greenbelt Planning Area. Industrial Areas Existing areas which include Darlington Nuclear Generating Newcastle Industrial Park, and Port Granby Federal site. These areas have very limited public access. ANSI Areas Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) are designated regions of land and water containing important natural landscape of features. Circle of Green Trail Conceptual long-term strategic vision for an interconnected network of green spaces and looped pathways throughout Bowmanville. Urban Trail Paved and multi-use path designed for non-motorized travel, separated from vehicle traffic. Biodiversity and People Movement Two-kilometre coastal edge supporting the east-west and north-south natural corridors, sediment transport, and staging, breeding, movement and habitat types for wildlife along the coastal zone, as well as multi-modal movement of people and sense of place.DRA F T Page 49 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 24 3.2 Guiding Principles The following five (5) guiding principles translate the Vision into clear direction for day-to- day decision making and long-term investments across Clarington’s waterfront. Grounded in community priorities and aligned with provincial, regional, and municipal policy, these principles set expectations for climate-resilient stewardship, equitable public access, community-scale development and sense of place. The Guiding Principles serve as a practical compass for planning, design, programming, partnerships, and stewardship, ensuring the vision is consistently advanced from concept to implementation along the Lake Ontario shoreline. Environmental Stewardship and Climate Resilience: Protect, restore, and enhance the natural environment, including the Lake Ontario shoreline, wetlands, and wildlife habitats, while actively planning for flood and erosion hazards and climate change adaptation and protecting biodiversity. Public Access, Connection, and Enjoyment: Ensure equitable, safe, and inclusive access to the waterfront for all residents and visitors, prioritizing public ownership and enjoyment of shoreline lands, recognizing the waterfront as a continuous and integrated corridor that supports ecological connectivity, including wildlife movement and sediment transport along the nearshore, and enhances public trail connections that link communities and natural spaces. Cultural Histories and Traditions:Celebrate the layered cultural histories and traditions on the waterfront lands through acts of reconciliation, a culture of inclusiveness and belonging, and through the historic interpretation of public spaces through design and local stories. Community-Scaled Economic Viability: Foster a sustainable waterfront economy that: supports small-scale, local businesses, creates employment opportunities for the community, and encourages tourism that complements the natural environment and enhances public enjoyment. Design Excellence and Community-Centred Planning: Create high-quality and impactful public and private realms through thoughtful, sustainable design that reflects the local character and is guided by transparent and meaningful community engagement. DRA F T Page 50 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 25 3.3 Five Distinct Experiences The ‘Five Distinct Experiences’ were developed through strategic guidance by the Strategy’s Vision and Guiding Principles – they are a mosaic of diverse experiences for all, connected by the waterfront and regional trails and linked through in-between spaces that provide unique secondary experiences. Each is envisioned as a distinct experience, as illustrated in the simplified depiction at the bottom of the Vision in Figure 6. Of these five (5) experiences, three (3) pertain to the ‘urban interface’ and two (2) pertain to the’ countryside interface’ with the Lake Ontario shoreline. The three (3) ‘urban interface’ waterfront experiences (i.e., Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle) support the coastal ecology and resiliency of the dynamic shoreline, while providing direct visual and physical access to the lake, amenities and connections to the northern urban trails, future GO stations and the historic downtowns. The two (2) ‘countryside interface’ waterfront experiences (i.e., agricultural heritage and Port Granby Nature Reserve) also contribute to the protection of the coastal ecology and dynamic shoreline resilience, while offering visual access to the lake due to the contrasting topography of the shoreline bluffs and enjoyment through nature-based activities and programming, and tourism. Collectively, all five (5) waterfront experiences and their interconnectedness through movement of people, wildlife and natural processes align with the Guiding Principles. Next sections explore each location’s waterfront experience and vision, as well as high- level cost estimates for Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle waterfronts. DRA F T Page 51 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 26 3.3.1 Courtice Waterfront Experience DRA F T Page 52 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 27 Note, these images are for illustrative purpose only (from left to right). 1. Betsy Patterson Square, www.mansfieldmdp.org/betsy-paterson-square 2. Assembly Row Urban Plaza Rendering, https://copleywolff1.squarespace.com/all- projects/assembly-row 3. Lake Wilcox Park Splash Pad, www.vacationnorth.ca/listings/312790 4. Great Divide Nature Interpretation, www.tripadvisor.ca/Attraction_Review-g154912-d1738994- Reviews-Great_Divide_Nature_Interpretation-Lake_Louise_Banff_National_Park_Alberta.html 5. Nouveaux aménagements à la plage de l’Est, https://estmediamontreal.com/nouveaux- amenagements-plage-est-pointe-trembles/ 6. Park Shelter, https://srpshelter.com/inspirations/sunset-park-id 7.Quai des Cageux (Cageux Wharf) observation tower, Quebec The future Courtice Waterfront Park is located along the shoreline of Lake Ontario, between Darlington Provincial Park and Courtice Shores Road. It is a new park that is planned as part of the Courtice Waterfront Secondary Plan. The vision for this area will be integrated into the Strategy, following its approval by Council. The new municipal-wide park and secondary plan area is envisioned as a vibrant, family- friendly destination where residents and visitors alike can spend the day enjoying nature, recreation, and community connection. With its scenic waterfront setting and integrated trail network, the new park will support a wide range of passive and active uses—from walking and cycling to picnicking and educational exploration. Park programs and design are being confirmed through a parallel design process, with a strong emphasis on recreation, ecological integrity, inclusive access, and long-term stewardship of the waterfront landscape. 3.3.1.1 Courtice Waterfront Park Concept The Courtice Waterfront Park will include areas that support gatherings, commercial uses and events towards the west, and more naturalized areas for trails, outdoor education, and accessing the water towards the east. There are also additional lands to the north where the park may be expanded to include additional natural landscapes east of Tooley Creek. More detailed descriptions of how the Concept addresses the Guiding Principles is described below and illustrated in Error! Reference source not found.DRA F T Page 53 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 28 Actively plan for erosion hazards and focus shoreline stability interventions where a balance between accessibility, safety, environmental integrity, and cost eﬀectiveness can be achieved. Protect, restore, and enhance the natural environment, including the shorelines, wetlands, woodlots and areas prone to flooding. Improve climate resilience and management of the waterfront’s connected landscape in all areas. Include signiﬁcant new segments of the Waterfront Trail connecting to the Courtice Shores Trail to new communities to the north. New trails bridge the Tooley Creek valley and connect the park to areas north of the rail line. Provision of new park recreational amenities that are designed to meet the needs of a new and diverse community through all seasons of the year. Town Square, Central Active Zone and Event Pavilion envisioned as a community gathering hub accommodating small business activities, community events, picnic pavilions and enhanced waterfront experiences. Street D, as identified in the secondary plan, provides additional opportunities to blur the line between commercial retail uses and the park edge. Additional opportunities at the Nature Hub East where canoe, kayak, and stand-up paddleboard rentals can be accommodated, as well as concessions. Create high-quality and impactful public and private realm, through thoughtful, sustainable design that reﬂects the local character and is guided by transparent and meaningful community engagement. Design elements and materials to be selected for durability and sustainability while contributing to a high-level of design consciousness.DRA F T Page 54 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 29 Figure 7 Courtice Waterfront Park Concept (Draft Courtice Waterfront Park Secondary Plan, 2025) DRA F T Page 55 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 30 Figure 8 Courtice Waterfront Park Vision - West Area (Draft Courtice Waterfront Park Secondary Plan, 2025) DRA F T Page 56 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 31 Figure 9 Courtice Waterfront Park Vision - East Area (Draft Courtice Waterfront Park Secondary Plan, 2025) DRA F T Page 57 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 32 Figure 10 Courtice Waterfront Park Vision - Additional Potential Park to the North (Draft Courtice Waterfront Park Secondary Plan, 2025) DRA F T Page 58 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 33 3.3.1.2 Courtice Waterfront Specific Recommendations Village Square Located at a prominent intersection in the planned Courtice Waterfront neighbourhood and nestled within the proposed commercial-retail and mixed-use core of the community, the Village Square is planned to serve as a prominent gateway to the park. The Square is envisioned as an active programming zone oﬀering opportunities for community events and gatherings while being well connected to parking, park access points, gardens and shade tree planting and the linear urban Street D, as per the secondary plan, promenade. Village Interface The street at the northern edge of the park is envisioned as a shared use promenade that creates a welcoming transition between the proposed mixed use, commercial and residential uses to the north, and the new waterfront park to the south. This linear promenade balances urban streetscape uses (vehicle travel, parking, activation areas, tree planting) while blurring the interface between the street and the park. Central Active Zone The Central Active Zone, located at the heart of Courtice Waterfront Park, is designed to make the park a true destination for visitors. It incorporates active features like a playground, upland beach, splash pad, fitness hub, and potentially sport courts. The area is easily accessible from local streets and parking and connects to the Waterfront Trail. The design incorporates open lawn and picnic spaces throughout, ideal for smaller events and gatherings. Additional adaptable areas, such as seating nodes, grassy slopes and open areas provide versatility for seasonal activities and community use. Event Pavilion and Grassy Slope The proposed events pavilion and grassy slope takes advantage of naturally existing site topography. The event pavilion is proposed to include washrooms, a warming feature for the winter and a shade canopy for the summer. It will be the focus point for special events and performances throughout the year while providing convenient access to both the grassy slope and the Central Active Zone. Flexible Picnic Areas Flexible use picnic areas are integrated throughout the site to provide the community opportunities to organize food and celebration-based events within a waterfront park environment. Picnic areas are proposed to be equipped with barrier free picnic tables, DRA F T Page 59 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 34 BBQ’s, picnic shelters (various sizes) with electrical and water service and ﬁre pits in some locations. Nature Hub West Nature Hub West is located near the centre of the Courtice Waterfront Park, reﬂecting the community’s desire for a passive, naturalized space. This area oﬀers opportunities for relaxation, play, and education, and can be the focus of Indigenous Place Keeping initiatives. The location adjacent to the Tooley Creek Valley, is beautiful and peaceful, lending itself to educational, contemplative and spiritual activities. The design of the area should be developed in collaboration with local First Nations. The design proposes several gathering nooks with seating and bike parking, all centrally positioned and connected to the internal trail network and the Waterfront Trail. These connections provide easy access to the active family zone, the beach access ramp, and the kayak drop-oﬀ point. Additionally, this space could feature an outdoor classroom for learning activities and interpretive signage to enhance educational experiences. It is also envisioned as a potential location for a communal gathering area, such as a ﬁre pit. Nature Hub East And Beach Access Nature Hub East and Beach Access Area provide connections to Courtice Shores Road, the Waterfront Trail and direct access to the beach. The area is proposed to include a shade structure with winterized washrooms, a small outdoor education/gathering area, bike parking, drop-oﬀ loop, canoe /kayak/ stand-up paddle boarding short term storage, parking, access to the Waterfront Trail and barrier-free beach access ramp. The area also includes access to a beach overlook feature. Potential Municipal Nature Park North of The Courtice Waterfront Park on the east side, lies a newly identiﬁed parcel envisioned as a potential municipal park as illustrated in Figure 10. The design intent prioritizes preserving the site’s natural character, ensuring minimal disruption to existing vegetation and ecological features. Access and circulation parking is available at both ends of the park, providing convenient entry points for visitors. From these entrances, a network is proposed of 2.1-meter-wide limestone trails winding through the landscape, traversing Environmentally Protected Areas lands and crossing Tooley Creek via a bridge. These trails would connect seamlessly to Courtice Shores Drive, Street D as per the secondary plan, and theDRA F T Page 60 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 35 regional Waterfront Trail, creating an integrated loop that links the Courtice Waterfront Park and surrounding areas. Parking Parking has been thoughtfully distributed across the entire site. This approach supports multiple entry points and reduces congestion, making it convenient for families, pedestrians, and visitors arriving by car. Approximately 170 parking spaces are planned for, including regular accessible spaces to accommodate daily use and seasonal events. Lookouts The bluffs at the shoreline make physical access to the water’s edge very challenging. Creating visual and barrier-free opportunities for park visitors to engage with Lake Ontario will be important in enhancing the waterfront park experience. Three lookout locations are proposed - each with a unique conﬁguration and elevation to provide a variety of experiences. The lookouts are proposed to be cantilevered overtop the erosion hazard areas with abutments and other supports being constructed outside of the hazard aﬀected areas. DRA F T Page 61 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 36 Figure 11: Bowmanville Waterfront Vision DRA F T Page 62 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 37 3.3.2 Bowmanville Waterfront Experience DRA F T Page 63 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 38 Note, these images are for illustrative purpose only (from left to right). 1. Base 31, Dillon Consulting 2. Harish Forest Park, https://landezine.com/the-harish-forest-park-by-bo-landscape-architecture/ 3. Rattray Marsh, www.ontarioconservationareas.ca 4. Dundas Place, https://londonlive.ca/tags/Dundas-Place 5. Port Stanley, www.shutterstock.com 6. Kincardine Beach, www.kincardine.ca 7. Lake Wilcox Park, Dillon Consulting 8.Landscape Design,www.nycgovparks.org The Bowmanville waterfront is located within the valleys of the Soper and Bowmanville Creeks, nestled within the Bowmanville Marsh with natural heritage links to the Bowmanville Westside Marsh. Its vision is anchored by three (3) connected public spaces at the centre of Bowmanville Creek that create an iconic gateway to one of the most unique experiences along Clarington’s shoreline – an ecological corridor with flourishing biodiversity, habitat and community connections to the marshes, West Beach Area, East Beach Area and the bluffs. The Bowmanville waterfront will be celebrated for its provincially significant coastal natural heritage area, expansion of the Waterfront Trail, local business village, public boat launch and connectivity north of Highway 401 – as per Figure 11. Bowmanville’s waterfront features enhancements to both West Beach Park and East Beach Pars. More detailed descriptions of how the Concept addresses the Guiding Principles is described below. Enhanced naturalization of the dynamic barrier beach, protecting and restoring the Flood Damage Area resilience to coastal and marsh flooding, erosion and hazard. Improved climate resilience and management of the waterfront’s connected landscape in all directions. New Waterfront Trail at the east edge of Bowmanville Marsh towards the dynamic barrier beach at Lake Ontario, crossing Bowmanville Creek with a new pedestrian bridge towards East Beach Park. Connections from Waterfront Trail to the new Circle of Green trail system across Highway 401. Revitalized waterfront parks with new amenities and facilities sensitively integrated into the shoreline’s connected landscape.DRA F T Page 64 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 39 Rooted in the design and experience of the waterfront lands are the layered Indigenous voices, knowledge and traditions to be shared through reconciliation, as well as the site’s working harbour and cottaging cultural remnants. Established Local Business Village north of East Beach area supporting community small-scale commercial activity offering an improved public and visitor experience of the waterfront. Additional economic viability with picnic pavilion rentals, boat launch and community events/festivals. Community-led design process. Invested commitment to design excellence, place making and sustainable design for waterfront lands. 3.3.2.1 Bowmanville Parks Concept The Bowmanville Parks Concept, presented in Figure 12, illustrates an ecologically diverse and climate resilient approach to parks design, while also incorporating spaces for new programming and improvements to public amenities. These three public spaces include: The Bowmanville Marsh is the natural anchor of this portion of the Waterfront. Although managed by CLOCA, the Municipality will need to coordinate conservation efforts and partnership opportunities to protect and restore the ecological integrity of the Marsh overtime. Edge conditions, access by trails and roads, stormwater infrastructure tie-ins, lighting, boating practices and outdoor storage will all have environmental impacts to the Marsh. It will be important for the Municipality to address potential adverse impacts to the Marsh as recommended projects progress as part of the Parks Concept. The West Beach Area is envisioned as Clarington’s main beach, a restored dynamic barrier beach, with amenities that support ecologically sensitive park programming and reflect the cultural histories of the place. The transition to a fully naturalized barrier beach will be phased over time, honouring the existing cottage lease holders. Waterfront connectivity will be enhanced by a strategically sited pedestrian/cycling bridge linking West Beach to East Beach across the harbour outlet. The East Beach Area and Village is envisioned as a pedestrian-oriented active shoreline zone with improved park amenities, local-scale commercial area, boating access, parking, and open space. The East Beach Area Parks will allow for more formal programming for events and is linked to the boat launch and storage located directly to the north.DRA F T Page 65 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 40 Figure 12: Bowmanville Parks Concept DRA F T Page 66 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 41 3.3.2.2 Bowmanville Parks Specific Recommendations Pedestrian Circulation and Bridge In the West Beach area, the Waterfront Trail is designed to extend beside West Beach Road to the west and along the future service road towards the Waterfront Trail Bridge Connection to the East Beach area. The bridge unifies the eastern and western park areas, enabling the west end to support the natural and evolving landscape of the dynamic barrier beach and hazard lands, and focusing on providing additional amenities in the East Beach area, outside of the hazard zone. The bridge will be accessible and provide appropriate height clearance for recreational boating and dredging equipment between the harbour and Lake Ontario, as determined in future feasibility studies. In the East Beach area, the Waterfront Trail extends east from the bridge and towards Port Darlington Road. The meandering boardwalk along the north side of the future access road is designed as the main pedestrian access to the West Beach from the north and east, with occasional scenic views to the marsh from seating and lookout areas. As the boardwalk is located within sensitive and hazard lands, the feasibility of its design will be determined in relation to all-year public access and safety, environmental impact and engineering, material and placement considerations. The boardwalk enables educational opportunities for the public on the biodiversity and functions of the Bowmanville Marsh, an important Provincially Significant Wetland. An opportunity for a single marsh access point along the boardwalk should be considered with a seasonal floating dock, offering access to the water with non- motorized watercraft. A second pedestrian connection is also envisioned along the publicly accessible areas of the West Beach, looping back to the access road and boardwalk, and in the long-term planning horizon have a continuous informal path along the beach. A flexible streetscape along Port Darlington Road, between the commercial village and East Beach Park, will enable a pedestrian-oriented environment that complements the scale of the streetscape and weaves the park and vibrant commercial activities. The flexible streetscape is designed to accommodate pedestrian movement during community events during peak seasons as a vibrant public space, while lowering traffic speeds and expanding mobility options. Lookouts and Open Spaces A series of lookouts and open spaces are featured, including heritage commons commemorating the multiple layers of history, traditions and heritage; grassy picnic areas as overflow parking; open picnic areas at the water’s edge; gathering space with a small stage; sport courts or flexible active recreational area; picnic pavilions requiring seasonal facility rental permits, and open area / patios / privately-owned publicly accessible spaces (POPS) extension to the north of the flexible street. DRA F T Page 67 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 42 The West Beach Area serves as passive recreational space in recognition of the coastal hazards and protection of the sensitive natural heritage features. No formal gathering or programmed zones should be encouraged while the existing cottage residential uses remain as the predominant use of the area. Within the East Beach Area existing play facilities and new community amenities become the central focus, creating a recreational waterfront hub appealing to residents and visitors. Further design of the East Beach area should consider the seasonal day versus peak time utilization. Screening planting is features where adjoining private lands to the parkland converge, featuring a mix of deciduous and coniferous planting species. Parking The West Beach Area retains the existing West Beach Road access to the existing cottages, supporting park operations access and accessible drop off area and parking. The main and overflow (for seasonal peak demand periods) permeable parking area is intentionally located at the periphery of the West Beach Area to minimize vehicular traffic along the southern access road, protecting the dynamic barrier beach landscape and encouraging pedestrian movement throughout the site. Parking in the East Beach Area is provided along Port Darlington Road, extending along the northern edge of the park. The main and overflow (for seasonal peak demand periods) parking area is intentionally located to the northeast to service the boat launch, local business village and the East Beach Park – park users can also use this parking to access the Waterfront Trail Bridge Connection and West Beach Area. The parking locations encourages pedestrian movement throughout the site. Note:further study will be required to mitigate impacts of overflow parking in green/open space areas, specifically related to stormwater runoff and filtration. Beach Areas The West Beach Area is a dynamic barrier beach, and its adaptive management provides an educational / interpretive opportunity around the natural feature functions and sensitive landscapes. The dynamic beach is expanded and restored through planting and beach management best-practices to its natural ecological landscape. The heritage commons, and West Beach Area in general, feature a culturally significant interpretation of the Indigenous knowledge, use and traditions on this land, harbour and industrial history, and use as seasonal cottages. Access to the beach is also provided at the west end by the parking, with a seasonal watercraft rental facility, and mid-block connections from West Beach Road. West Beach also features beach volley-ball courts. DRA F T Page 68 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 43 The East Beach Area features a waterfront promenade and lookout, and no access to the lake. Gateways Key gateways provide a welcoming entrance and distinct sense of place to users of the waterfront, while also contributing to improved wayfinding and navigation along the waterfront lands. Gateways should be visible and allow for a combination of structure, wayfinding signage, planting, lighting, low walls, interpretive signage and/or allow for space for potential public art commissions. Both West and East Beach Areas feature gateways that are an intersection between park entrances and bridge with Waterfront Trail. Park Facilities The West Beach Area includes a seasonal building for watercraft rentals. Building on the existing facilities in the East Beach Park, the area also features picnic pavilions and a public boat launch, as well as play fields. The concept for the East Beach Park also includes an gathering space with a natural informal stage platform for smaller local events and performances. Public Boat Launch A new public boat launch is proposed in the northern portion of the East Beach Area, with enhanced circulation and parking lot and edge docking along the harbor outlet. The location of the public boat launch will be determined upon further strategic actions by the Municipality, discussions with CLOCA, community consultation and feasibility studies. Note: All proposed elements of the Bowmanville Parks Concept, including the bridge, parking, public boat launch and rental facilities, are visionary and subject to further detailed technical studies to confirm feasibility, ensure public safety, and evaluate the significant long-term investment and maintenance required.DRA F T Page 69 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 44 Figure 13: Newcastle Waterfront Concept DRA F T Page 70 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 45 3.3.3 Newcastle Waterfront Experience DRA F T Page 71 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 46 Note, these images are for illustrative purpose only (from left to right). 1. Vancouver Waterfront Master Plan + Park, www.pwlpartnership.com/projects/vancouver- waterfront-master-plan-park 2. Cincinnati’s Smale Riverfront Park, https://kzf.com/portfolio/smale-riverfront-park/ 3. Intergenerational Playscale at Beverly Park, www.legacyparks.org 4 Outdoor Gym Images, www.pikwizard.com 5. Scenic Fall, www.kincardinewelcomes.ca/scenic-fall 6. Food Truck Evening, www.stockcake.com 7. Destination Ontario, www.ontariobybike.ca/family-fun-bike-rides-exploring-toronto/ The Newcastle Waterfront is nestled in between Wilmot and Graham Creeks. Existing parks include Lakebreeze Park, Bond Head Parkette and newly acquired lands. The vision for this area is closely aligned with the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan (2024), which guides development in the adjacent community and emphasizes new trail connections and view preservation that will integrate with the waterfront. The Newcastle waterfront will be celebrated as a residential marina village hub, with public realm access and design excellence: Lakebreeze Park is envisioned as a resilient shoreline park with flexible park space, outdoor fitness equipment and naturalization settings. Bond Head Parkette is envisioned as a community space, integrating the cultural histories of the place with naturalization. Newly acquired lands are envisioned as a gateway park with public art, plaza with mobile food services, and a multi-generational play space. 3.3.3.1 Newcastle Waterfront Parks Concept The Newcastle waterfront promotes amenities and access to the waterfront with routes for pedestrians, key gathering and lookout spaces, beach access, park amenities and enhancements to the public launch facilities. The trail network is envisioned as a loop, utilizing the hydro corridor for an off-road connection to the north and a southern route along the waterfront, connecting back up to Toronto Street. The Bond Head Park offers beach, open space and boating facilities, while areas to the west include natural meadows, parkland, play areas, an arrival plaza, gathering nodes and lookout points. Trail routes connect throughout the landscape with links northward to a connection across the harbor. Public support facilities including parking and washrooms are proposed on both sides of the waterfront lands. Figure 13 illustrates the vision for the waterfront lands, with descriptions of the key features below. DRA F T Page 72 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 47 Transformed Lakebreeze Park into a resilient shoreline park with flexible passive space and naturalization by enhancing natural defenses against erosion and flooding while protecting and promoting biodiversity throughout the creek valleys. Expanded local trail system, utilizing both the hydro corridor and the southern waterfront route to better connect the community to the natural environment. This network will also integrate various amenities, including beach access, a public boat launch, and key gathering and lookout spaces. Continually explore ways to highlight Indigenous history through the Waterfront amenities, particularly in the harbour and marina, as well as community based cultural acknowledgement of the lands surrounding the shoreline. Fostered sustainable waterfront economy by activating the newly acquired lands as a gateway park featuring a plaza with a mobile food service area, creating small-scale, local economic opportunities and encourage tourism that complements the natural and recreational assets of the marina village. Created high-quality and impactful public and private realm reflecting the character of a residential marina village. All design elements, from the arrival plaza and park amenities to the trail links, will be guided by transparent and meaningful community engagement to ensure design excellence. 3.3.3.2 Newcastle Waterfront Parks Concept Newcastle waterfront surrounding Bond Head Park will build upon its current programming and site amenities to become an enhanced gathering space along the shoreline. This section of the waterfront will be oriented to community amenity enhancement and improvement of the coastal landscape. Improvements should support the continued operations of the marina, as illustrated in Figure 14. The Newcastle Waterfront Parks Concept features light-touch improvements and naturalization to Lakebreeze Park to the west, and a new park with mobile food services, multi-generational playgrounds, flexible open space and washroom facilities south of the marina with planting screening and landscape buffer. The Bond Head Park features improvements to the Waterfront Promenade and path system, lookout areas, shaded central plaza, building with washrooms facilities and food services, and naturalized shoreline. Improved access and gateway features along Boulton Street will create a heighted sense of place along the eastern side of the waterway. DRA F T Page 73 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 48 Figure 14: Newcastle Waterfront Parks Concept DRA F T Page 74 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 49 3.3.3.3 Newcastle Waterfront Specific Recommendations Bond Head Park Enhancements The Bond Head Park provides a waterfront park with enhanced naturalized park areas and access to a small beach. The small beach is protected with shoreline improvements and an enhanced waterfront promenade with a defined edge of shoreline naturalization. The western portion of the park will continue to support a public boat launch with enhanced circulation and parking for car and trailer movement. Shoreline docking along the harbour outlet supports the launch facilities with several spaces for mooring. Lakebreeze Park Naturalization The western portion of Lakbreeze Park, located on sensitive erosion hazard lands, features a restored landscape (e.g., meadow) and no-mow zones following best management practices to create habitat for biodiversity, including migratory pollinator pathways. The low meadow landscape maintains views from the residential lands, as well as from the Waterfront Trail and lookouts to Lake Ontario. The meadow landscape once established will be a low maintenance area with occasional management. The long grasses will also assist the landscape in up taking runoff and reducing edge erosion. Integrated along the Waterfront Trail is a natural outdoor fitness station that offers a range of exercise options along the meadow setting, to be applied further west along Lakebreeze Park. Parking On the west end, a drop off loop and roadside parking along Lakebreeze Drive supports community access to the western Waterfront Trail, new park and its shoreline amenities. The Bond Head Parkette includes public parking as part of the boat launch, as well as layby parking along Boulton Street. Lookouts and Open Spaces At the south end of the Lakebreeze Drive roundabout, a small plaza area is included to support programmed activities, gathering area and location for mobile food services, with nearby new washroom facilities. An overhead trellis is proposed to provide pedestrian comfort and gateway into the lake. Additionally, pockets of natural seating are included just south of the multi-generational play area. At the east end, Bond Head Park features an enhanced waterfront promenade, extending eastward that terminates in a gathering plaza with a shade trellis structure, seating and cultural interpretive signage. This lookout along the outlet provides view over to Bond Head Park and will offer some of the most unobstructed views of the eastern shoreline and Lake DRA F T Page 75 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 50 Ontario. Additionally, the park features a lookout at the base of the eastern pier with seating and shade offering protected views of Lake Ontario, and a smaller lookout on the east side of the park. Gateways Two key gateways in the western area are located at pedestrian intersections at Lakebreeze Drive and Shipway Avenue providing links northward into the community and to the Waterfront Trail to the east. These locations also act as visual portals to the trail and Lake Ontario. Along the eastward trail an open space is provided for picnicking and informal recreation. The trail also includes access to playgrounds, seating nodes, and interpretive information on the heritage of the Newcastle Waterfront. Note: All proposed elements of the Newcastle Parks Concept, including the washroom facilities, enhanced parking, outdoor fitness, and lookouts, are visionary and subject to further detailed technical studies to confirm feasibility, ensure public safety, and evaluate the significant long-term investment and maintenance required. DRA F T Page 76 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 51 3.3.4 Agricultural Heritage Experience DRA F T Page 77 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 52 Note, these images are for illustrative purpose only (from left to right). 1. Clarington shoreline, Municipality of Clarington 2. Tourism Association, https://buchung.urlaub-hamburg-altesland.de/de/719038/rad-touren- altes-land 3. Ocean Beach Esplanade, https://onetreewellness.ca/yoga 4 Cycling Safety, www.escarpmentmagazine.ca/recreation/cycling-safety/ 5. Cycling View, urbanMetrics 6.Picnicking, https://conservationhamilton.ca/activities/picnicking/ Most of the waterfront lands east of Newcastle towards Port Granby represent a unique and sensitive interface between a dynamic natural environment and shoreline, and a productive agricultural landscape. Characterized by agricultural heritage—vast, active farming operations that define the local identity and economy—the lands require careful stewardship towards adaptation and resilience. As this area falls within the Protected Countryside Greenbelt Planning Area, and due to the inherent hazards of the eroding shoreline and bluffs, long-term investment into the waterfront public space amenities is not recommended within the erosion hazard limits. The strategic intent for the agricultural heritage waterfront lands is to provide low-key open spaces and rest-stops along the on-road countryside Waterfront Trail network and visual access to Lake Ontario. The overall strategy is defined by a commitment to resilience, passive use, and tourism through existing agricultural practices. Access is defined by maximizing the enjoyment of open spaces through environmentally sustainable design, while explicitly avoiding new structural investment that conflicts with the area's sensitive ecology and increasing erosion of the bluff shoreline, and planning for potential future abandonment of established natural amenities. Very natural and low-impact interventions on such public waterfront lands can integrate the multi-layered cultural heritage, histories and traditions of the region. Outlined below is a set of Guiding Principles that maximize public benefit through passive access while respecting the physical constraints and cultural values of the land.DRA F T Page 78 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 53 A long-term adaptation approach to help recognize the need for a public safety buffer along the erosive bluff shoreline, suggesting flexible decommissioning of paths rather than hard infrastructural protection. Education and partnership with local landowners on agricultural best practices and working with Conservation Authorities to identify and close gaps in the regional wildlife habitat corridor. Strategic, safe, and publicly accessible rest stops along the Waterfront Trail and lookouts that are set back well beyond the hazard line of the sensitive bluffs. No water access. Rooted in the experience of the waterfront lands are the layered Indigenous voices, knowledge and traditions to be shared through reconciliation, as well as the countryside interface area’s blended and preserved local tradition and food production communities. Celebrated as an agricultural heritage hub. Agri-tourism (i.e. cidery, spirits, apple-picking routes, permitted open spaces with views, etc.) opportunities and tourism. Passive use of space, no new structural investment. Environmentally sustainable products to support shorter life-cycles of features proposed to support the passive use of these public lands. Pedestrian Circulation and Cycling Lakeshore Road is as a multimodal road active transportation and maximizing the user experience within its physical parameters. It serves as a vital on-road section of the Great Lakes Waterfront Trail cycle route, accommodating cyclists, as well as potential walking and jogging pedestrians, while supporting essential access for interspersed properties. Future active transportation networks along the rural roads feature separated lane road profile and/or visibly marked shared roads to prioritize user safety. Open Spaces and Lookouts To support the cycling routes and passive enjoyment of the agricultural landscape and viewsheds to Lake Ontario, the public lands feature nature-based seating (e.g. armourstone, wood and grass) and enhanced open spaces that are set-back from bluffs, the plan will provide intentional, informal view nodes of Lake Ontario. These stops are designed for cyclists and pedestrians to pause and gather briefly, maximizing public benefit while strategically avoiding costly, high-impact infrastructure in the sensitive, eroding area. DRA F T Page 79 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 54 Parking Despite the prominent cycle route and significant vistas, public parking is intentionally avoided along Lakeshore Road due to the dominant agricultural land use provides minimal demand, and the rapidly eroding bluffs prevent the safe development of other features that would deem parking necessary. DRA F T Page 80 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 55 3.3.5 Port Granby Nature Reserve Experience DRA F T Page 81 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 56 Note, these images are for illustrative purpose only (from left to right). 1. Ontario Hiking, https://ontariohiking.com/island-lake-conservation-area/ 2. Tourism Association, https://buchung.urlaub-hamburg-altesland.de/de/719038/rad-touren- altes-land 3. Vicki Barron Lakeside Trail, https://ontariohiking.com/island-lake-conservation-area/ https://bestrussm.click/product_details/38439887.html 4 and 5. Picnicking, https://conservationhamilton.ca/activities/picnicking/ 5. Forest School by Pinar.Alt.Un https://www.instagram.com/p/Cj3X_o 1Lbbh/ Figure 15 Port Granby Lands DRA F T Page 82 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 57 The Port Granby Nature Reserve is a vast expanse of federal lands established because of a collaboration between the Municipalities of Clarington and Port Hope, the GRCA and the Port Granby community. It is a proposal to the Government of Canada to transfer ownership of federally owned lands surplus to the Port Granby Project to local agencies for ecological restoration and preservation. These surplus lands represent the Port Granby Nature Reserve and are located in the southeast corner of Clarington at the boundary with Port Hope. The surplus federal reserve lands have an established concept plan previously endorsed by Council. The lands represent a unique opportunity for environmental restoration, education and public access. This remains a significant, long-term project that will be a significant public asset once larger conversations regarding final ownership and management are complete and the lands are made accessible. The description of each feature and how it falls within the Guiding Principles is outlined below. Large nature reserve along Clarington’s waterfront. Natural oasis and public education site that highlights sensitive environmental characteristics of the site, including enhanced wetlands, forests, meadows, agricultural pastures and trails. Publicly accessible as a destination, and a rest stops along the Waterfront Trail with lookouts that are set back well beyond the hazard line. No lake water access. Rooted in the experience of the waterfront lands are the layered Indigenous voices, knowledge and traditions to be shared through reconciliation, as well as location’s legacy of past practices and clean-up initiatives. A trail and other physical structures will promote passive recreation and encourage eco-tourism. Trail design outside of hazard and erosion areas but still providing view of Lake Ontario.DRA F T Page 83 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 58 Trails The Port Granby Nature Reserve will connect to the Waterfront Trail along Lakeshore Road. Additionally, the nature reserve will feature primary accessible trails and a secondary more advance trail network through the various proposed landscape ecologies. Open Spaces and Lookouts Open spaces will feature interpretive signage and designated day-time picnic shelter areas for daily enjoyment and organized educational groups/sessions. Topographical mounds will feature elevated lookout points to Lake Ontario, and the surrounding context. Access, Gateway and Parking Access to the Port Granby Nature Reserve, from Lakeshore Road, will feature a gateway and parking lot to safely welcome visitors. The size and location of the parking lot will be determined based on forecasted visitor demand. The design of the parking lot should feature Low Impact Development features, with planting enhancements to minimize urban heat island effect and loss of natural cover. The gateway should accommodate a rest -stop for cyclists on Lakeshore Road and be designed as an important marker of arrival to the nature reserve. DRA F T Page 84 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 59 Figure 16: Illustrative Concept for Port Granby Nature Reserve, 2010 DRA F T Page 85 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 60 3.3.6 Waterfront Park Cost Estimates Cost estimates were prepared for Bowmanville and Newcastle waterfront parks using a comparative value for waterfront parks. Park improvements and enhancements in existing parks (i.e., Bond Head Park, Lakebreeze Park, etc.) are itemized in the tables below, and new parks feature both itemized features and allowances for park areas that maintain a high-level of conceptual design - new park construction was prepared with a per acre cost. Both costing approaches are based on 2025 construction and supplier costs, and cost estimates for comparable waterfront park improvements in other Ontario municipalities. A detailed cost estimate will be determined upon further site investigation, such as servicing, geotechnical, natural environment assessments, waterway bathymetry and fluvial geomorphology and topographic surveys. Cost estimate exclusions and assumptions are presented below. 3.3.6.1 Cost Estimate Exclusions and Assumptions The itemized cost estimate for Bowmanville and Newcastle excludes the following items: 1.Soft costs (i.e., consulting services from landscape architecture, engineering, etc. professions); 2.Site assessments (i.e., survey, geotechnical, site security, vegetation inventory, etc.); 3.Site servicing to proposed facilities (i.e., water, sewer, electrical, etc.); 4.Permitting/approval costs (i.e., CLOCA, GRCA, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Species at Risk Act, permit to work, etc.) 5.Stakeholder, community and Indigenous engagement; 6.Disposal of soils/contaminated soils and associated reporting; and, 7.Contract administration and site observation of construction works;DRA F T Page 86 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 61 Bowmanville Waterfront Parks Concept – Park Specific Assumptions 1.Gateway features are assumed to be two (2) masonry clad concrete masonry unit columns, footings and excavations. 2.Lookout features are assumed to be a maximum of 60 squared metres, made of lumber with guard rails, post and footings and associated excavations. 3.Boardwalks are assumed to be a raised lumber deck, without guard rails. Includes post and footings and associated excavations. 4.Washroom facilities are assumed to be one (1) floor when determining square footage. Includes interior mechanical work, foundation walls, but does not include site utilities (assuming water/sewer/electrical will be tied into an existing on-site source) 5.Heritage Commons unit rate per acre is based on the average per acre cost of multiple destination park developments. 6.Beach volleyball cost is based on the average cost of multiple volleyball court installations, includes sand, edging, base material, nets and posts, concrete and excavation. 7.Waterfront Trail bridge is based on previous pedestrian bridge costs, plus a factor of 3x to account for the extended approach slab and raised height to allow passage of motorized water vehicles. Includes trail tie-in, approach slabs, railings, bridge abutments, retaining elements, bridge superstructure, excavations and de-watering. 8.Natural restoration assumes the upper end cost of wild seed mix, topsoil and fine grading only. 9.Plaza/patio cost assumes a large, custom semi-circular shade structure, footings and patterned concrete and excavations. 10.Sports courts assume an average per meter unit rate of $168, based on the average cost of other, similar court installations. Assumes topsoil and fine grading, turf, line painting and associated equipment (i.e., nets, etc.) 11.Boat launch costs assume a concrete ramp and prefabricated, floating dock, excavations, shoring piles, trail tie-in and rough grading. Does not include any retaining wall/shore break elements.DRA F T Page 87 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 62 Newcastle Waterfront Parks Concept 1.Outdoor fitness assumes multiple fitness stations, no moving parts. This includes the equipment, surfacing, subsurface drainage within the fitness area footprint, curbs and associated excavations. 2.Plaza/gathering space in Bond Head Park assumes the cost of paving and associated excavations only. All other features (i.e., washroom, lookout) are accounted for in other line items. 3.3.6.2 Courtice Waterfront Park Cost Estimate Cost estimate will be included in the final Strategy. 3.3.6.3 Bowmanville Parks Concepts Cost Estimate A rough order of magnitude cost estimate for Bowmanville Waterfront Parks is $19.5 million, representing the approximate construction costs to implement the vision as illustrated in Figure 12. It factors featured areas within West Beach, East Beach, new boat launch and parking, and new local business village – this totals a park improvement area of approximately 17.4 acres. 3.3.6.4 Newcastle Park Concept Cost Estimate A rough order of magnitude cost estimate for Newcastle Waterfront Parks is $6.5 million, representing the approximate construction costs to implement the vision, as illustrated in Figure 14. It factors in the proposed areas within Lakebreeze Park, new parkland and Bond Head Parkette – this totals a park improvement area of approximately 7.84 acres.DRA F T Page 88 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 63 Table 3 Courtice Waterfront Park Cost Estimate Description Qty.Unit Unit Amount Combined Total Cost estimate will be included in the final Strategy. DRA F T Page 89 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 64 Table 4 Bowmanville Waterfront Parks Cost Estimate Description Qty.Unit Unit Amount Combined Total West Beach Area Gateways 2 each $25,000.00 $50,000.00 $10,477,604.00 Lookout 1 each $40,000.00 $40,000.00 Trail (3 m wide)213 linear metre $500.00 $106,500.00 Boardwalk (5 m wide)2154 m2 $2,500.00 $5,385,000.00 Dock 1 lump sum $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Washrooms/ Rental Facility 1 lump sum $475,000.00 $475,000.00 Gravel Parking 882 metre squared $75.00 $66,150.00 Open Parking 882 metre squared $65.00 $57,330.00 Heritage Commons (allowance)2 acre $928,186 $2,285,193.93 Beach volleyball 2 each.$300,000.00 $600,000.00 Restoration 21874 metre squared $20.00 $437,480.00 Tree plantings / Screening 1114 metre squared $175.00 $194,950.00 Waterfront Trail Bridge 1 Lump sum $750,000.00 $750,000.00 East Beach Area Gateway 2 each $25,000.00 $50,000.00 $5,809,190.00 Lookout 2 each $40,000.00 $80,000.00 Trail (3 m wide)950 linear metre $500.00 $475,000.00 Boardwalk (5 m wide)1395 metre squared $800.00 $3,487,500.00 Boat Launch 1 lump sum $250,000.00 $250,000.00 Gravel Parking 2398 metre squared $75.00 $179,850.00 Open Parking 2176 metre squared $65.00 $141,440.00 Sports Courts 2 each.$185,000.00 $370,000.00 Plaza / Patios 1 Lump sum $210,000.00 $210,000.00 Tree plantings / Screening 2088 metre squared $175.00 $365,400.00 Natural Restoration 10000 metre squared $20.00 $200,000.00 Sub-Total $16,286,794.00 Contingency (20%)$3,257,359.00 Total $19,544,153.00DRA F T Page 90 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 65 Table 5 Newcastle Waterfront Parks Cost Estimate Description Qty.Unit Unit Amount Combined Total Lakebreeze Park $466,250.00 Gateway features 1 each $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 Lookout seating 6 each $ 2,500.00 $ 15,000.00 Lookouts 3 each $ 40,000.00 $ 120,000.00 Outdoor fitness station 1 lump sum $ 85,000.00 $ 85,000.00 Tree planting 15 each $ 750.00 $ 11,250.00 Natural Restoration 10500 squared metre $ 20.00 $ 210,000.00 New Park Open Space restoration (allowance)2.524 ac. $ 928,186 $ 2,342,742.00 $2,417,742.00Gateway features 3 each $ 25,000.00 $ 75,000.00 Bond Head Park Gateway features 1 each $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $2,561,475.00 Boardwalk 455 squared metre $ ,500.00 $ 1,137,500.00 Lookouts 2 each $ 40,000.00 $ 80,000.00 Parking 1220 squared metre $ 75.00 $ 91,500.00 Washrooms/food services 1 lump sum $ 850,000.00 $ 850,000.00 Plaza/gathering space 1 lump sum $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Natural Restoration 2705 squared metre $ 20.00 $ 54,100.00 Tree planting/landscaping 1505 squared metre $ 175.00 $ 263,375.00 Sub-Total 5,445,467.00 Contingency (20%)$1,089,093.00 Total $6,534,560.00DRA F T Page 91 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 66 4.0 ImplementationDRA F T Page 92 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 67 Over the next 30 years, Clarington’s waterfront will thrive as One Connected Waterfront, Five Distinct Experiences (see Section 3.0) – a publicly-accessible and ecologically nurturing waterfront that leads to quality-of-life improvements, scalable economic growth, tourism, and assessment values while generating social, inclusionary, health, environmental and community benefits. Table 6 Clarington Waterfront Strategy Implementation Phases Phase 1: Foundational Recommendations (Present to 2030) Focused on actions that set the groundwork for the Strategy and completing ‘quick win’ projects on Municipal lands. Phase 2: Keystone Initiatives (2030 to 2040) Focused on completing high-impact public projects within the five distinct waterfront experiences in Clarington. Phase 3: Waterfront Legacy (Beyond 2040) Focused on completing transformational projects that unify and achieve the full Vision for Clarington’s waterfront.DRA F T Page 93 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 68 The implementation of the Strategy is structured around an incremental three-phase process, each with a specific focus and priority level, as described in Table 6, and associated actions in Section 4.1. The actions are aligned with the Vision and Guiding Principles of this Strategy (see Section 3.0) and provide the road map to the Municipal staff, Council, community and its partners. They are organized into the following five categories to facilitate easier navigation and tracking of the implementation: 1.Capital Projects, Infrastructure and Funding 2.Policy, Zoning, and Regulatory Requirements 3.Studies, Master Planning, and Design 4.Internal Processes and Programs 5.Partnerships The following section provides the implementation plan for the Strategy within three (3) phases and organized into the five categories discussed above. Phase 1 implementation is presented in Section 4.1.1. Phase 2 implementation is presented in Section 4.1.2. Phase 3 implementation is presented in Section 4.1.3.DRA F T Page 94 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 69 4.1 Implementation Plan The following section outlines general recommendations and 31 actions within a three- phased timeline to implement the Strategy. Adopt ecological and adaptation (i.e., avoid, accommodate, retreat and protect) approaches to longer-range waterfront planning and land management Create educational materials for school boards, researchers and visitors to continuously promote and advance evolving trail system, health, ecological and environmental impacts to the community. Continuously engage with the community and stakeholders to help prioritize implementation of the park, and to advance detail design for the Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle park concepts; Ensure that Indigenous interests are provided an opportunity to engage with the Municipality on all work involving the waterfront lands. Safeguard processes towards the Municipality’s reconciliation goals and actions with Indigenous communities through the implementation of the Strategy. Determine priorities for the implementation of the Strategy for all future Municipality’s Strategic Plans, supported by multi-year budget process; Update cost estimate and associate capital budget planning for park enhancements and new park projects as they get defined through future feasibility studies, servicing needs, master planning and detailed design; Promote the Waterfront Trail and actively enhance and expand the trail system in partnership and alignment with the Waterfront Regeneration Trust plans. Secure a long-term funding source for ongoing waterfront maintenance and programming. Update Asset Management Plan (AMP) to include new waterfront assets and evaluate the condition of existing assets. Also, update core and non-core asset conditions and priorities on the waterfront lands, aligning implementation of key projects with the replacement/ repairs needs; Complete background studies (i.e., survey existing site conditions, soils stability, contamination, servicing,etc.) for actions in each phase of implementation; Adapt and reprioritize uncompleted actions at the start of each implementation phase in response to changing erosion, flood and other unforeseen climate impacts, and update funding strategy in accordance with next phases of the Strategy; and, Review the Strategy after every 10 years of implementation to confirm alignment with the planning and policy frameworks and regulations at the time, and successes to date. Note, numbered actions do not imply importance of one action over the other. DRA F T Page 95 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 70 4.1.1 Phase 1: Foundational Recommendations (Present to 2030) Table 7: Phase 1 Implementation Categories and Actions Recommended Action Capital Projects, Infrastructure and Funding 1.Plan (i.e., capital planning, funding, partnerships, etc.) and complete ‘quick-win’ projects listed below to kick-off the implementation of the Strategy: a. Establish ‘no-mow’ zones and naturalization of linear waterfront edge parks (e.g., Lakebreeze Park and Lakebreeze Waterfront Park), with shaded tree lookouts, seating and natural outdoor fitness equipment. b. Extend Waterfront Trail south to Courtice Shore Drive and p parking lot and trail access connecting to Courtice Shores Trail. c. Provide waterfront lookout areas on existing countryside public lands with appropriate setbacks, restoration planting, natural materials and low- maintenance features. d. Expand waterfront-specific wayfinding at key entry points and decision- making locations, ensuring consistency with the overall municipal wayfinding system, in alignment with the Wayfinding System Strategy. e. Engage in naturalization and habitat restoration projects in partnership with CLOCA and GRCA for the non-occupied cottage parcels in West Beach and formalizing natural paths and signage to the dynamic beach. f. Implement priority action(s) from the new ATMP, enhancing the east-west and north-south connectivity and access to the waterfront. 2.Prepare a multi-year capital plan and various funding sources for the Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle park concepts to guide large investments at each location. 3.Develop a funding strategy, and secure funding opportunities to advance Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle waterfront park priorities to detailed design development and construction: a. Provincial and Federal government funding, and in partnership with local conservation authorities; b. Joint venture partnerships with local private sector partners for the financing, design and construction of commercial space in Bowmanville; c. Corporate and personal sponsorship for supporting new investment and promotion of tourism/economic development on Clarington’s waterfront lands (e.g., recreational facilities, signage, etc.); and, d. Recognize that fundraising and stewardship programs are continually changing. DRA F T Page 96 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 71 Recommended Action Policy, Zoning, and Regulatory Requirements 4.Implement the Strategy into the COP. 5.Consider zoning classifications and specific regulations for the public waterfront lands during the comprehensive review of the Municipality’s zoning by-law. 6.Undertake feasibility studies for a washroom facility, parking, north waterfront promenade and boat dock, new boat launch location and pedestrian bridge for the implementation of the Bowmanville Waterfront Parks Concept. 7.Build sustainability and climate resiliency into development of all waterfront lands to support the ecological and adaptation planning approaches. Secondary plans for waterfront lands have established sustainability guidance. Studies, Master Planning, and Design 8.Formally coordinate the Vision and implementation actions (i.e., studies, capital projects, etc.) stemming from this Strategy with the concurrent implementation, capital priorities and recommendations of other plans and master plans (e.g., PRC Master Plan, Active Transportation Master Plan, Transportation Master Plan, Transit Master Plan, etc.). 9.Create (or update existing) timeline for the implementation of the Port Granby Nature Reserve project, in alignment with the Strategy. 10.Update the Municipality’s 2018 Urban Forest Strategy to establish baseline and target canopy cover for the urban interface and countryside interface waterfront lands as they require different approaches (e.g., street tree planting and closing wildlife corridor gaps). This will allow the Municipality, in partnership with others, to apply for tree planting funding. 11.In partnership with CLOCA and GRCA, use best management practices and update standards with new adaptation-based approaches (i.e., abandoning a trail, etc.) and preparedness for climate resilience (i.e., natural buffers), including rest area intervals, emergency preparedness, lighting, waste management and shoreline safety. These will guide the detailed design and construction of all the future improvements in the waterfront, as well as operations and maintenance. 12.Conduct operational feasibility studies for establishing small-scale, seasonal commercial opportunities (e.g., watercraft rental building) as part of the strategy for all five (5) distinct waterfront experiences.DRA F T Page 97 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 72 Recommended Action Internal Processes and Programs 13.Establish a dedicated, multi-departmental Waterfront Implementation Team to champion, coordinate, and report on the implementation of the Strategy. This team will be the central point of accountability. 14.Land acquisition as outlined within the Waterfront Strategy will be supported by the updated COP’s objectives to improve and create new open spaces through parkland dedication. This would highlight protection of Lake Ontario shoreline, creating a continuous trail system and public realm improvements (i.e., lookouts, parks, public amenities, natural areas). 15.Prepare a monitoring plan for the Strategy to allow the Waterfront Implementation Team to periodically measure and track the success of the overall implementation, in concert with the local CLOCA and GRCA watershed monitoring and protection efforts and standardized watershed report cards. Partnerships 16.Establish connections for new off-road Waterfront Trail routes in utility corridors, in collaboration with Hydro One, and other private easements to improve overall connectivity. Provide acknowledgement of advancement of trail networks through shared infrastructure and agency partnerships. 17.Continue to collaborate with adjacent municipalities on enhanced trail system connections. Provide signage and wayfinding to raise awareness of extent of trail system. 18.Build new (or strengthen existing) partnerships with key partners to help implement the Strategy, including community groups, key stakeholders, Region of Durham, conservation authorities for joint habitat restoration and shoreline management projects, and Indigenous communities towards co-stewardship and place-keeping along the waterfront lands.DRA F T Page 98 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 73 4.1.2 Phase 2: Keystone Initiatives (2030 to 2040) Table 8 Phase 2 Implementation Categories and Actions Recommended Action Capital Projects, Infrastructure and Funding 1.Begin phased construction of the Bowmanville Waterfront improvements, focusing on the West Beach enhancements, trail connections, and initial park amenities. 2.Begin phased construction of the Newcastle Waterfront improvements, focusing on the new park along Lakebreeze Drive and Bond Head Park enhancements. 3.Establish and complete phased construction the Courtice Waterfront Park in line with the approved Courtice Waterfront Secondary Plan and detailed design. Policy, Zoning, and Regulatory Requirements 4.Initiate a Cultural Heritage Landscape study of the waterfront lands to identify, protect, and celebrate significant tangible and intangible elements, building on the COP direction. Studies, Master Planning, and Design 5.Prepare and implement a waterfront branding and tourism strategy that: a. builds upon existing municipal strategies by creating a unified brand identity for the ‘One Connected Waterfront, Five Distinct Experiences' that aligns with the broader municipal brand; b. promotes the waterfront as a tourism destination, with a focus on the unique experiences of the five distinct destination areas in the Municipality’s tourism materials; and, c. Includes programming for waterfront events and festivals to help establish vibrancy and locally scaled attractions to the waterfront lands. 6.Evaluate the market, economic and community needs for boating, docks and marine facilities with environmental regulations, and their ownership and operation models. 7.Advance next steps in the implementation of the Port Granby Nature Reserve project, in alignment with the Strategy, including partnerships and funding opportunities.DRA F T Page 99 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 74 Recommended Action Partnerships 8.Partner with local Indigenous communities to co-develop and install interpretive signage and public art that shares their history and stories related to the waterfront. DRA F T Page 100 Draft Clarington Waterfront Strategy | December 2025 | 75 4.1.3 Phase 3: Waterfront Legacy (Beyond 2040) Table 9 Phase 3 Implementation Categories and Actions Recommended Action Capital Projects, Infrastructure and Funding 1.Complete the construction of the Waterfront Trail Bridge in Bowmanville, which requires significant studies and funding. 2.Construct any remaining phases or elements of the five (5) distinct waterfront experiences. 3.In partnership with federal agencies, facilitate the public opening of the Port Granby Nature Reserve with its trail network and interpretive program. Policy, Zoning, and Regulatory Requirements 4.Update the Strategy to align with the future COP policies, regulatory frameworks, economic drivers, waterfront study area conditions, funding opportunities, and science on climate change and shoreline resilience. Partnerships 5.Establish a permanent Waterfront Trust or foundation to oversee long-term stewardship, programming, and fundraising for waterfront enhancement projects. DRA F T Page 101 Appendix A B Community Engagement Summaries DRA F T Page 102 THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 DRA F T Page 103 Table of Contents i The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 Table of Contents Execuve Summary 1.0 Introducon 1 2.0 Engagement Acvies 2 2.1 Engagement Acvies ......................................................................................................2 3.0 What We Heard 4 3.1 Council Interviews ............................................................................................................5 3.2 Visioning Workshops ........................................................................................................5 3.3 Online Survey ...................................................................................................................8 3.4 Community Pop-ups .........................................................................................................9 3.5 Stakeholder Meengs .....................................................................................................10 3.6 Targeted Youth Engagement ..........................................................................................10 3.7 Parks, Recreaon and Culture Plan (2024) ......................................................................10 4.0 Next Steps 11 Tables Table 2-0 Engagement Activities ........................................................................................................ 2 Table 3-0 Engagement Summary ....................................................................................................... 4 Table 3-1 Mural Board Summary ....................................................................................................... 6 Table 3-2 Mentimeter Summary ........................................................................................................ 7 Table 3-3 Online Survey Summary ..................................................................................................... 8DRA F T Page 104 Executive Summary ii The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 Execuve Summary The Municipality of Clarington (the Municipality) is developing the Clarington Waterfront Strategy (the strategy) with a renewed vision for the 34-kilometre stretch along Lake Ontario. Dillon Consulting Limited (Dillon) and urbanMetrics Inc. have been retained by the Municipality, to assist in the preparation of the strategy. This new strategy builds on past successes and aligns with key plans such as the Clarington Strategic Plan, Official Plan, the 2020 Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan, Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan (2024), and active transportation initiatives. The approach is guided by fundamental principles rooted in Clarington’s 1992 Waterfront Strategy and the Crombie Commission. The focus is on providing diverse and usable spaces that are safe and inclusive for people of all ages and abilities while ensuring efficient use of resources. Building on Clarington’s cultural and natural heritage assets and previous planning initiatives, the Municipality aims to understand the needs and desires of the community and stakeholders for the waterfront. Clarington’s expansive shoreline, with its diverse and evolving land uses, can support a range of experiences and flourish as a regional destination along the waterfront. To enable the alignment of social, environmental, cultural, and economic values, extensive engagement has been carried out with residents, stakeholders, visitors, businesses, and other interested parties. During the first round of engagement in 2022, a variety of in-person and online activities were conducted to share information and gather input. Engagement activities included two stakeholder visioning workshops, a youth engagement activity, interviews with the Mayor and Council, additional stakeholder meetings, and Indigenous outreach. To gather feedback from the broader public, online methods of engagement were utilized, including creating a project website, social media posts, and an intercept survey. Community pop-ups at key locations were held along the waterfront to build project awareness, engage directly with participants, and advertise the online survey. Through the engagement activities and events with the public and stakeholders, several key themes emerged. These themes were deduced from the valuable insights gathered during the interactions and reflect the primary concerns, interests, and ideas shared by participants and include: Increasing accessibility and connecvity across and to the waterfront. Safety for trail users and traﬃc calming measures. Commercial development including restaurants and retail. Creang a desnaon on the waterfront to aract visitors and residents. Waterfront infrastructure and amenies to support recreaon such as bike parking, equipment rentals, and washrooms. Trail improvements such as year-round maintenance and wayﬁnding. Opportunies for paid parking for visitors and potenally residents. Waterfront recreaon opportunies including passive and acve recreaon. Preserving green spaces, protecng natural heritage and wildlife habitats. DRA F T Page 105 Executive Summary iii The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 The project was paused in November 2022 and has since been reinitiated in early 2025. The updated schedule for the project reinitiation will be presented to Council on May 12thth, 2025, including key strategy elements such as the draft vision, proposed “big moves”, and community input to date. Additionally, public consultation on the strategy will resume in spring/summer 2025, focusing on gathering feedback on the vision and “big moves”. DRA F T Page 106 1.0 Introduction 1 The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 1.0 Introducon The Municipality of Clarington (the Municipality) is currently undertaking the development of the Clarington Waterfront Strategy (the strategy). The strategy is the first comprehensive update since 1992 and builds on Clarington’s successes while aligning with other relevant plans including the Clarington Strategic Plan, Official Plan, the 2020 Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan, Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan (2024), and active transportation initiatives. To accomplish the Municipality’s desired objectives and outcomes, there are fundamental principles and best practices that guide the approach, these principles are shaped by Clarington’s original 1992 Waterfront Strategy and the Crombie Commission: Clean: Posively contribute to a healthy environment. Green: Protect and enhance natural, cultural and built heritage features. Connected: Create a network of linkages for people to enjoy the waterfront. Open: Frame waterfront views and vistas. Accessible: Priorize safe and publicly accessible design for people of all ages and abilies. Usable: Ensure supporve and compable public and private uses. Diverse: Ensure an oﬀering varied opportunies for residents and visitors are available. Aﬀordable: Make eﬃcient use of public and private sector resources for all. Aracve : Strive for excellence in design. The Municipality is looking to build upon its cultural and natural heritage assets, planning successes and relationships with the community and key stakeholders, while recognizing the existing and future needs of a growing and aging community, Indigenous peoples, and visitors to Clarington. Clarington’s long shoreline with adjacent mixed and evolving land uses needs to support diverse experiences and thrive as regional destinations along the waterfront - the social, environmental, cultural and economic values need to align. To confirm the alignment of these values, extensive engagement in Round 1 has been conducted with area residents, stakeholders, businesses, and interested parties. This first round of engagement was conducted in June to October 2022 before the pause to the project; as of January 2025, the project has been reinitiated. Since 2022, several other projects have gathered input related to the waterfront, including the Active Transportation Master Plan (in progress), 2024- 2027 Strategic Plan, and the Parks, Recreation, and Culture Plan (2024). The feedback received through these initiatives will be considered for the development of the waterfront strategy. The following summary looks at what has been completed so far in Round 1 of engagement and the key themes of feedback.DRA F T Page 107 2.0 Engagement Activities 2 The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 2.0 Engagement Acvies A series of activities to support public and stakeholder engagement were held throughout Round 1. The activities were designed to provide multiple opportunities to gather feedback on various aspects of the project. The following section provides a table with a synopsis of the approaches used to gather input in round 1 of engagement. The input received from the activities below is summarized in Section 3.0 What We Heard. 2.1 Engagement Acvies Table 2-0:Engagement Acvies Engagement Activity Summary Project Introduction and Website Update June 2022 The project was formally launched to build awareness and notify interested parties. This included a website update with project information and how to get involved. Stakeholders were also informed of the project, and how to sign up for updates. Communications June – October 2022 In addition to the website, additional communications included: Social Media: Posts on social media directed people to the website, online survey, and promoted the community pop-ups. Coroplast Signs: Signs were posted along the waterfront and included a QR code to direct users to the online survey. Informaon Sheet: A handout with a summary of the strategy purpose and engagement opportunies was available. Postcard: A handout created to raise awareness and direct to project website. Indigenous Communities Outreach and Engagement August -October 2022 Outreach to Indigenous communities was to introduce the project and the vision, build relationships, and to understand how communities wanted to be engaged. Council Interviews #1 July - August 2022 The 2022 Council and Mayor were interviewed to introduce the project, and seek input on the vision, strategy, and engagement activities. Visioning Workshops with Steering Committee, Agencies, Community Stakeholders (virtual) October 6th, 2022 2:00 – 4:00 p.m. 6:30 – 8:30 p.m. seek input on vision, priorities, opportunities and constraints. Workshop attendees included: Municipality of Clarington (Infrastructure Engineering – Capital Works, Public Works – Parks and Cemeteries, Tourism, Planning – Policy and Secondary Plans, Municipal By-Law Enforcement) Waterfront Regeneraon Trust Ontario Power Generaon Region of Durham – Planning and Works Ministry of the Environment, Conservaon and Parks - Ontario Parks DRA F T Page 108 2.0 Engagement Activities 3 The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 Engagement Activity Summary Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry St Mary’s Cement Clarington Board of Trade Region of Durham – Economic Development Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Ganaraska Region Conservaon Authority Intercept Online Survey August 22 – October 3, 2022 An online survey was conducted to understand the community’s collective vision, priorities, and the opportunities along the waterfront. Questions sought to gain insight into the public’s current use of the waterfront, preferences for the future of the waterfront, and top priorities for the updated Clarington Waterfront Strategy. In total, 419 people answered the survey and the open-ended questions each received between 105 and 134 responses. Five Community Pop-Ups August – September, 2022 The following community pop-ups were held to introduce the project, raise awareness, and advertise the online survey, answer questions, and seek input on the strategy. Port Darlington East Beach – August 24, 2022 Cource Shores Rd (Trailhead) – August 27, 2022 Bond Head Parkee – August 27, 2022 Chronicle Brewery – September 17, 2022 Newcastle Harvest Fesval – October 1, 2022 Stakeholder Meetings July – September, 2022 The following stakeholder meetings were held to inform participants and gather input: Parks Ontario / Ministry of Environment, Conservaon and Parks (re: Darlington Provincial Park) – June 27, 2022 Ontario Power Generaon – July 12, 2022 Waterfront Regeneraon Trust – July 12, 2022 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (re: Wilmot Creek Crown Lands) – July 14, 2022 Clarington Acve Transportaon and Safe Roads Advisory Commiee – September 7, 2022 Accessibility Advisory Commiee – September 7, 2022 Samuel Wilmot Natura Area Management Advisory Commiee – August 9, 2022 Diversity Advisory Commiee – September 22, 2022 Targeted Youth Engagement Activity #1 August 1, 2022 A targeted youth engagement activity was held through the Clarington Summer Camps to introduce the project and seek input from youth. An activity ‘Drawing the Waterfront’ aimed to understand what participants would like to see developed at a future waterfront destination.DRA F T Page 109 3.0 What We Heard 4 The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 3.0 What We Heard The following sections provide a summary of what we heard through each of the various engagement activities in Round 1. The table below provides a high-level summary of the key takeaways and themes from the input received from all the variety of engagement activities: Table 3-0:Engagement Summary Key Themes Takeaways Increasing Accessibility and Connectivity The importance of an accessible, public-oriented waterfront. Accessibility was identified as a challenge on the waterfront and ideas included a wheelchair accessible beach access point and trail system. There was desire for safe active transportation and transit options to access the waterfront. Safety Safety was a major concern across the waterfront, with a particular focus on improving pedestrian access through better sidewalks and off-road options. Additionally, traffic calming measures are needed to address speeding in high-traffic areas and shared road locations. Commercial Development There was support for commercial businesses along the waterfront, especially in Bowmanville. Seasonal ventures like food trucks, paddleboard rentals, small retail shops, a cidery, and restaurants are seen as acceptable, with a particular desire for more food and beverage options, such as hot dog and ice cream stands. Destination Nodes & Placemaking The primary focus for the next five years should be on Bowmanville, with efforts directed towards positioning it as a key tourism destination. As parks become more crowded, there is also a demand for additional waterfront destinations, and Clarington could look to other municipalities for inspiration in developing a "destination" waterfront. Waterfront Infrastructure Support for a boat launch if it is economically viable and, in the meantime, space for boat launches for non-motorized vessels. Other infrastructure to support the waterfront included access to washrooms, bike parking, rental equipment options, and other basic amenities. Trail Improvements There should be more all-season trails, where the community supports them. The location of the waterfront trail during the OPG New Build was a key topic, with an emphasis on improving accessibility and signage. Safety for trail users, especially on shared road sections, is a major concern across the waterfront. Parking There is support for charging non-locals for parking, with some desire for charging locals as well. Parking was noted as a challenge for the waterfront.DRA F T Page 110 3.0 What We Heard 5 The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 Key Themes Takeaways Waterfront Recreation Opportunities There is value in both active and passive recreation opportunities along the waterfront, such as non-motorized watercrafts, playgrounds, birding, pathways, and benches. A desire for better beach access and designated swimming areas. Natural Environment Preservation Preserve natural wildlife habitats along the waterfront. Desire for protecting and enhancing existing natural areas and the opportunity to educate through signage. Minimize development to protect natural areas and green spaces. 3.1 Council Interviews Key themes from the interviews with the Mayor and 2022 Council included the following: Emphasized an accessible, public-focused waterfront with focus on projects that beneﬁt all. More commercial business should be supported at the waterfront, parcularly at Bowmanville. Seasonal commercial enterprises such as food trucks, paddleboard rentals, small retail, cidery or restaurants are acceptable. The biggest focus should be on Bowmanville for the next 5 years. Should be the “desnaon” focus, tourism node, focus on trails. More all-season trails, but only in targeted places that the community supports. There is support for charging non-locals for parking, some support for charging locals. Support having a boat launch if economically feasible and support boat launches for non-motorized in the meanme. Recognion that the Bowmanville Pier needs serious work, but challenge is ﬁnancing. No support for the Municipality owning/operang a marina, unless it generates revenue. 3.2 Visioning Workshops The following charts are summaries of the two visioning workshops with stakeholders that were held to confirm the strategy principles, review the existing conditions, identify opportunities and challenges, and gather input to inform the development of a vision for the waterfront. The following chart is a summary of what participants said for each identified sub area that was gathered through a Mural Board activity, followed by results from Mentimeter polling questions.DRA F T Page 111 3.0 What We Heard 6 The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 Table 3-1:Mural Board Summary Sub-Area Opportunities Challenges Vision Ideas Waterfront Spaces Samuel Wilmot Nature Area (SWNA): Commercial opportunies/aracons, parking Year-round acvies and year-round public washrooms Garden Tourism Protected natural space along waterfront Create natural beach area Compeve cycling hub o Dining by the water o Downtown connecon o Green building design o Ecosystem based approach to planning o Connuous hiking trail Planning around CN rail and 401 highway Maintaining bond head parkee Increased traﬃc causing erosion/damage Keeping everyone safe around traﬃc Balancing economic development with environment Erosion and ﬂooding safety Ensuring there is adequate public land and shoreline access for the future Avoid losing heritage Getting to waterfront without driving, restaurants, open space, event space, beach volleyball courts, historical interpretive displays, extend waterfront trail, water related recreation opportunities, inclusive and accessible washrooms, robust connected wildlife corridor, enough amenities to spend a day: food, exercise activities, bike lockups waterfront rentals. Lands Natural garden development Ecotourism Increased signage/wayﬁnding Recreaon opportunies (e.g. birding, photography, geocaching) Restrict areas for natural development Interpreve displays with natural & cultural info Expand conservaon land sub areas Idenfy areas of wildlife movement and protect/enhance Parking Invasive plant species Maintaining wildlife populaon with increased human traﬃc Bluﬀ safety Increased potenal for polluon Protecng natural environment Integraon with provincial park Preserve migratory habitat, variety of trails, limit human access in some areas, make provincial park more accessible to areas residents, promote indigenous culture, and expand natural areas. Resiliency Nodes Public educaon: on connected watershed, invasive species and spring ﬂooding levels Indigenous uses of land perspecves Highlight natural areas along waterfront with educaon signage Increase awareness of hazards and direct development away from hazards Priorize land acquision where appropriate Assess climate vulnerability and target restoraon Appropriate public uses like trails Control of contaminants Waterfront bluﬀ erosion Ensure system is resilient to climate change Overcome invasive species with integrated strategy, balance nature and humans, promote indigenous history and culture. Industrial Areas Aract business to the community Engage industry stakeholders, inﬂuence their community stewardship programs Plant more trees Create marine conservaon area Provide beer transit/acve mobility access to area employment Promote green roofs with bird/pollinator friendly plants Screen development from adjacent areas Make hydro one corridors linear trails Reducing industrial polluon Maintaining east west connecvity Land use compability Screening industrial areas from recreaon uses Limit/eliminate industrial by the waterfront, more naturalized space near developments, recognize industry is important to the community.DRA F T Page 112 3.0 What We Heard 7 The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 Sub-Area Opportunities Challenges Vision Ideas Agricultural Lands More support for farmers Dark night sky areas for migratory species Preserve these areas as natural buﬀers Agri-tourism Allow farmers to vercally integrate their farms Require low light polluon Orchard camping Incenvize parcular agricultural land uses Apple picking Create public hiking trail based on European models Ensure farming methods don’t damage adjacent areas Liming amount of ferlizer/pescides that leach into water Protecng lands from development Lack of public amenies in these areas Keeping people away from damaging agricultural lands Erosion in Bond Head Bluﬀs area Farm to table agribusiness, preserve agriculture, allow some return to natural meadows, use land to increase local food source, maintaining/establishing natural setbacks from the lake. Table 3-2:Menmeter Summary Question 2:00 pm - 4:00 pm Session 6:30 pm - 8:30 pm Session (top 3 results) Where are you participating from today (top 3 results)Outside of Clarington: 10 Bowmanville: 4 Courtice: 2 Bowmanville: 4 Outside of Clarington: 3 Newcastle: 2 What type of organization are you representing (top 3 results)Municipal/Regional Government: 9 Other: 5 Provincial Government & Conservation authority: 3 Ratepayers Association: 3 Advisory Committee of Council: 3 Environmental Interest group & Other community group: 2 Are you familiar with the Clarington Waterfront Strategy (top 3 results)Somewhat familiar: 12 Very familiar: 5 Familiar: 4 Somewhat familiar: 5 Very familiar: 4 Familiar: 2 Top 3 words to describe your vision for the Clarington Waterfront (top 3 results)Recreation, accessible, connected Biodiversity, natural, access Top priority you want addressed in the Clarington Waterfront Strategy (top 3 results)Green- protects and enhances natural, cultural and built heritage features: 36% Connected- creates a network of linkages for people who enjoy the waterfront: 32% Accessible- safe and publicly accessible for all & Usable- supportive and compatible public and private uses: 14% Connected- creates a network of linkages for people who enjoy the waterfront: 42% Green- protects and enhances natural, cultural and built heritage features: 25% Diverse- offering varied opportunities for residents and visitors: 17% Do you think the 1992 principles are still relevant today (top 3 results)Somewhat agree: 15 Neutral: 4 Strongly agree: 3 Somewhat agree: 9 Strongly agree: 2 Neutral: 2 Do you the presented commercial business opportunities reflect what you would like to see on waterfront lands (yes/no) Yes: 14 No: 5 Yes: 7 No: 5 Which business opportunities would be the most exciting to experience in Clarington’s waterfront (top 3 results) Canoe, kayak, paddleboard rentals: 5 Agri-tourism (e.g. apple picking): 5 Destination cycling: 4 Accommodation/retreat venue: 3 Canoe, kayak, paddleboard rentals: 2 Bike and mobility supportive businesses: 2 Share one word for what you think will be the biggest challenge facing the waterfront over the next 30 years Accessibility, climate, urbanization Erosion, keeping it natural, parking Share one word for what you think will be the biggest opportunity for the waterfront over the next 30 years Tourism, restoration, recreation Tourism, diversified uses, attractive spaceDRA F T Page 113 3.0 What We Heard 8 The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 3.3 Online Survey An intercept public survey was available between August 22nd and October 3rd, 2022. Questions sought to gain insight into the public’s current use of the waterfront, preferences for the future of the waterfront, and top priorities for the updated Clarington Waterfront Strategy. Key themes and main takeaways from the survey include the following: Table 3-3:Online Survey Summary Key Themes Feedback Raised Demographics Of the 419 people surveyed, a majority are visitors to the waterfront area, either from other parts of Clarington or from outside the Municipality. A notable number of respondents were also local residents. General Feedback Respondents’ top priories for the updated strategy were that it be clean, green, and connected. Most respondents expressed a desire to improve the exisng features of the waterfront rather than make drasc changes. Many respondents were against the idea of addional housing by the water, as it appeared to privaze the waterfront. A few respondents strongly advocated for the reopening of the Bowmanville Marina. There were repeated requests for clearer boundaries between public and private property on Port Darlington West Beach. Recreation The waterfront’s most popular features are its natural beauty, the Great Lakes Waterfront Trail, hiking or walking opportunies, and the beaches. While respondents generally wanted most areas to remain natural, there was a strong desire for dining opons. Speciﬁcally, there was interest in a restaurant with a waterfront pao in Bowmanville or possibly Cource, as well as small-scale opons like an ice cream truck at Bond Head. Many respondents menoned that they enjoy non-motorized watersports and expressed a desire for more locaons to parcipate in these acvies, as well as more places to rent equipment. Some respondents expressed a desire for a more vibrant waterfront, featuring beachside retail, sports facilies (such as tennis courts and skateparks), and other waterfront aracons. There were requests for more spaces where people could enjoy the natural beauty of the waterfront, such as areas for picnics. Maintenance Many respondents expressed a desire for enhanced beach areas, including more frequent clean-ups and possibly using beach combing to remove rocks and create sandy areas. There was interest in enhancing basic amenies along the waterfront, including more frequent garbage pick-up.DRA F T Page 114 3.0 What We Heard 9 The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 Key Themes Feedback Raised Circulation & Ease of Access Parcipants expressed desire for safe and accessible opons for acve transportaon. This included improved and more visible connecons along the waterfront, as well as enhanced links between downtown areas and the waterfront to allow easier access to the lake without the need for driving. The need for increased parking was not a major concern. While respondents preferred not to pay for parking, they were open to the idea of non-residents paying for parking. A few respondents requested the addion of wheelchair-accessible beaches, trails, and playground equipment. There was a request for improved acve transportaon access, parcularly in Cource, with a priority on creang a cross beneath the 401. Safety Parking and boang areas should be disnct from spaces for children and acve transportaon to enhance safety. The congeson at Bond Head was frequently highlighted as a safety concern. A few parcipants strongly supported the idea of increased enforcement regarding parking, speeding, trespassing, and overall patrolling. There were requests for traﬃc calming measures near East Beach and Bond Head. Natural Preservation The tranquility and serenity of the waterfront are among its most valued qualies. While respondents are open to some development, preserving the natural green spaces is their top priority. Most parcipants preferred green areas to remain natural, with minimal development. Only a few respondents expressed interest in having the green space more manicured and landscaped. 3.4 Community Pop-ups Key themes from input provided at the community pop-ups included the following: Safety was a key concern across the waterfront. Safer pedestrian access is needed including beer sidewalks and oﬀ-road opons. Measures to reduce speeding at high traﬃc areas are needed. Access to the waterfront is diﬃcult: limited parking, lack of safe acve transportaon routes, and a lack of transit. More waterfront desnaons are desired as parks are geng busier. More commercial expansion is desired, especially food and beverage opons. More boat launches should be a priority. Clarington could follow the examples of other municipalies to create a “desnaon” waterfront.DRA F T Page 115 3.0 What We Heard 10 The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 3.5 Stakeholder Meengs Key themes from input received through the various stakeholder meetings included the following: Waterfront trail locaon during the OPG New Build was a key topic. Mulple stakeholders voiced the need for beer north-south waterfront connecons both for recreaon and wildlife, especially in Cource. Stakeholders appreciated informaon and look forward to connued involvement in the consultaon process. Beer accessibility and signage on trails would be appreciated. Safety for trail users, especially shared road secons, a concern across the waterfront. 3.6 Targeted Youth Engagement Key themes from the input provided through the Clarington Camp activity included the following: Valued both acve and passive recreaon opportunies at the water, including playgrounds, paths, and benches. More opons for food such as hot dog and ice cream stands. More access to the beach and places to swim. No menon of water sports or sports ﬁelds. 3.7 Parks, Recreaon and Culture Plan (2024) Feedback from the Parks, Recreation and Culture Plan included that the Municipality’s waterfront is highly valued by the community and there is potential for enhancement to encourage greater use such as passive recreation opportunities, including trails and outdoor spaces for special events, performing arts, and more. Public input related to enhancing the waterfront included the following: Build upon the trail network, including connecons to exisng trail systems and the greater acve transportaon system, as well as public waterfront access points (parcularly in Cource). Provide space for picnics and special events, cultural acvies such as performing arts, outdoor skang, personal watercra launch, public art, and parking. Establish a greater commercial presence such as retail and restaurants. Protect and preserve the environment along the waterfront.DRA F T Page 116 4.0 Next Steps 11 The Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Round 1 Engagement Summary Updated April 2025 – 22-4327 4.0 Next Steps The Municipality and Dillon will prepare and present an update and revised project schedule for the project reinitiation to Council on May 12, 2025. The Council will provide direction on moving forward with the strategy and public consultation. Public consultation is anticipated for spring/summer 2025 and will include virtual and in person opportunities for public and stakeholder engagement. For more information on project development and next steps, please visit:Clarington Waterfront Strategy - Clarington DRA F T Page 117 Municipality of Clarington Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary Report Clarington Waterfront Strategy August 2025 Table of Contents Background of Engagement Strategy ......................................................................... 2 Overview ................................................................................................................. 2 Tactics and Timelines ............................................................................................. 3 Response Rates ...................................................................................................... 3 Best Practices - Surveys .......................................................................................... 4 Survey Results The Vision ............................................................................................................... 5 Themes ................................................................................................................... 6 The Guiding Principles .......................................................................................... 8 Environmental Stewardship - Rating ........................................................................ 8 Economic Viability - Rating ...................................................................................... 9 Public Access, Connection and Enjoyment - Rating .............................................. 10 Design Excellence and Cultural Heritage - Rating ................................................. 11 Guiding Principles - Themes ................................................................................. 12 What Principle is Missing? .................................................................................... 14 The Five Distinct Experiences ............................................................................ 16 Courtice Waterfront Park - Rating and Themes .................................................... 16 Development to Support a Park - Rating and Themes .......................................... 19 Bowmanville Waterfront - Rating and Themes ...................................................... 21 Newcastle Waterfront - Rating and Themes ......................................................... 24 Agricultural Heritage .............................................................................................. 27 Port Granby Nature Reserve - Rating and Themes .............................................. 30 Additional Feedback ............................................................................................ 32 Themes: thoughts, ideas or feedback about the Waterfront Strategy ................... 32 Demographics ...................................................................................................... 34 What area of Clarington do you live in? ................................................................ 34 How long have you lived in Clarington? ................................................................. 35 Age group ............................................................................................................. 36 DRA F T Page 118 Page 2 Engagement Strategy Background Overview The renewed Clarington Waterfront Strategy will serve as a bold, long-term vision that builds on the foundation of the original 1992 strategy and sets the course for the next 30 years. Early stages of the project included a vision intercept survey, community pop- ups, Councillor interviews, and stakeholder meetings beginning in 2022. In 2025, a robust engagement process was undertaken to ensure the community had meaningful opportunities to learn about and shape the draft Vision, Guiding Principles, and Five Distinct Experiences that will inform the draft Waterfront Strategy. This document provides an overview of the input received during this second phase of community engagement. Additional efforts to solicit feedback will be made once the draft Waterfront Strategy has been developed to receive community input prior to finalization. The information and suggestions included in this report should not be interpreted as recommendations. Ratings and themes based on community input have not been altered even in instances where comments incorrectly reflect the Municipality of Clarington’s actual policies, practices or levels of provision. It should also be recognized that the requests and suggestions expressed by residents, stakeholders and staff may not result in recommendations within the Waterfront Strategy. The comments collected from these community engagement efforts will be considered in other inputs, including analysis that will be undertaken in the next phase to identify community needs related to the Waterfront Strategy. DRA F T Page 119 Page 3 Tactics and Timelines: To ensure broad and meaningful participation in shaping the renewed Clarington Waterfront Strategy, a community feedback survey was made available both online at www.clarington.net/WaterfrontStrategy and in person at Clarington Connected kiosks located in municipal recreational facilities, community complexes, and administrative centres. Following a public presentation of the draft Vision, Guiding Principles, and Five Distinct Experiences in May 2025, the survey ran from June 25 to July 30, 2025—strategically timed to coincide with the summer season, when lakefront recreation is top -of-mind for many residents. To reach as many people as possible, the following tactics were deployed: •Press release distributed to Clarington.net subscribers and local media outlets. •Survey promotion featured in the Summer 2025 Clarington Connected newsletter, mailed to every household in Clarington. •Social media campaign shared via Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn (paid and unpaid). •Advertisements displayed on all digital reach screens in the Municipal Administrative Centre, recreational complexes, and community centres. •H-frame signage installed along the Waterfront Trail in five distinct areas. •Posters and postcards distributed in libraries, recreational complexes, and community centres; also provided to Councillors for optional constituent distribution. •18 radio ads aired across KX96, The Rock, and CKDO. •Survey featured as the lead banner on the Clarington.net homepage. •Direct emails sent to the Interested Parties List for the Courtice Waterfront, Energy Park Secondary Plan, and Waterfront Strategy projects . •Survey available in-person at all Clarington Connected kiosks located in municipal facilities. •Google Ads campaign launched targeting Clarington residents searching for waterfront activities. •Lead story featured in the June edition of Growing Clarington Together newsletter. •Email invitation sent to registered ActiveNet users. Response Rates: •From June 25 – July 30, 2025, more than 4,700 people visited www.clarington.net/WaterfrontSurvey webpage. •602 people filled out the survey (making it Clarington’s second-highest survey for responses to date). Best Practices (Surveys): DRA F T Page 120 Page 4 Several tactics were deployed to ensure that Clarington solicited quality feedback from a high number of respondents, including: •Asking respondents to register for Clarington Connected to participate in the survey. This additional step helps eliminate “AI bots” that seek and fill out online surveys that offer incentives and prizes. This also ensured respondents could only submit feedback once, which eliminates multiple responses from the same person or IP address, providing more reliable data. •Offering a modest, neutral incentive ($250 VISA gift card) to solicit feedback. This common practice is used by many municipalities and researchers for a few reasons: o Increased response rates: Research on best practices for survey design and distribution shows that incentives and lotteries contingent on completion of surveys provide a higher response rate by providing additional motivation to complete the survey. o Diverse respondent pool: Research shows that providing incentives can impact the demographic composition of the completed survey sample, by encouraging more people to participate. The use of gift cards, which can be used by everyone, helps to reach a wider range of participants and ensures a more varied, unbiased pool of respondents. ▪For example: prizes like recreational passes can reduce interest from respondents who either already have access to Clarington’s recreational facilities or aren’t interested in recreational incentives. DRA F T Page 121 Page 5 Survey Results The Vision – Ratings and Themes A clear vision is essential, as it sets the long-term direction and unites around a shared purpose. It inspires action, guides priorities and ensures that all decisions contribute to a cohesive, future-focused outcome. The Vision: Clarington’s waterfront is a vibrant, accessible destination where community, nature, parks, and heritage meet. Our shoreline thrives through ecological resilience, connected trails, diverse recreation, and economic vitality. By focusing on sustainable growth, cultural preservation, and public access, we’re creating a legacy that enriches the lives of residents, captivates visitors and establishes a legacy of stewardship for generations to come. Q.1: How much do you agree with the overall vision for the Clarington waterfront? On a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents rated the overall Vision for Clarington’s waterfront 3.84. DRA F T Page 122 Page 6 Q2: What aspects of the Clarington waterfront vision do you find most appealing or concerning, and why? The community envisions Clarington’s waterfront as a publicly accessible, ecologically resilient, and culturally respectful space that prioritizes nature preservation, connected trails, and inclusive recreation over intensive residential or commercial development. Residents overwhelmingly support a vision that enhances quality of life through sustainable growth, while expressing concerns about overdevelopment and the loss of natural and community character. Key Themes Environmental Stewardship & Ecological Resilience •Strong support for preserving natural habitats, biodiversity, and shoreline integrity. •Calls for prioritizing “natural assets” as critical infrastructure. •Concerns about environmental degradation from increased traffic, boating, and development. Connected Trails & Public Access •Widespread enthusiasm for expanding and connecting trails for walking, biking, and recreation. •Emphasis on accessibility for all ages and abilities, including shaded areas, seating, and safe crossings. •Desire for year-round use and improved connectivity between communities. Recreation & Community Use •Support for parks, splash pads, music venues, and family-friendly amenities. •Interest in community gathering spaces and sm all-scale local businesses (e.g., cafés, markets). •Preference for low-impact enhancements that maintain the waterfront’s peaceful character. Concerns About Residential Development •Strong opposition to waterfront housing, especially high-density or luxury developments. •Fears of increased traffic, noise, pollution, and strain on infrastructure and services. •Desire to preserve small-town charm and avoid turning natural areas into service corridors. Bond Head Boat Launch Concerns •Resistance to designating Bond Head Parkette as a primary boat launch. •Infrastructure limitations, environmental risks, and community disruption cited. DRA F T Page 123 Page 7 • Suggestions to relocate boat launch to better-equipped areas like Bowmanville Marina. Cultural Preservation & Heritage • Mixed views on cultural preservation; some see it as vague or underprioritized. • Requests to protect historic cottages and integrate Indigenous and local history meaningfully. Community Priorities • Preserve nature first: Avoid over-commercialization and protect ecosystems. • Build for people, not profit: Focus on inclusive, accessible public spaces. • Think long-term: Ensure sustainable infrastructure and stewardship for future generations. DRA F T Page 124 Page 8 The Guiding Principles – Ratings and Themes To support the implementation of this draft Waterfront Vision, four guiding principles have been developed to establish a framework and set priorities for future decision - making. They include: • Environmental Stewardship: Protect and enhance the natural environment, including the Lake Ontario shoreline, wetlands, and wildlife habitats. • Economic Viability: Foster a vibrant and sustainable waterfront economy that supports local businesses, attracts investment and tourism, and creates employment opportunities. • Public Access, Connection and Enjoyment: Ensure equitable, safe and inclusive access to the waterfront for all residents and visitors. • Design Excellence and Cultural Heritage Preservation: Create high-quality and impactful public and private realm, while also recognizing, protecting, and celebrating the rich cultural heritage of the waterfront. Q.3: How much do you agree or disagree with the draft guiding principle of Environmental Stewardship? On a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents rated the Guiding Principle of Environmental Stewardship 4.37. DRA F T Page 125 Page 9 Q.4: How much do you agree or disagree with the draft guiding principle of Economic Viability? On a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents rated the Guiding Principle of Economic Viability 3.73. DRA F T Page 126 Page 10 Q.5: How much do you agree or disagree with the draft guiding principle of Public Access, Connection and Enjoyment? On a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents rated the Guiding Principle of Public Access, Connection and Enjoyment 4.29. DRA F T Page 127 Page 11 Q.6: How much do you agree or disagree with the draft guiding principle of Design Excellence and Cultural Heritage Preservation? On a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents rated the Guiding Principle of Design Excellence and Cultural Heritage Preservation 3.88. DRA F T Page 128 Page 12 Q.7: What aspects of the draft guiding principles do you find the most appealing or concerning, and why? Residents broadly support the guiding principles of Clarington’s waterfront strategy, especially those emphasizing environmental stewardship, public access, and inclusive design. However, there is concern that economic development and residential expansion could undermine the natural character, accessibility, and long-term sustainability of the waterfront. Key Themes Environmental Stewardship •Most widely supported principle. •Residents want strong protections for wetlands, wildlife habitats, and shoreline ecosystems. •Concerns about habitat loss, pollution, and erosion due to overdevelopment and increased traffic. Public Access, Connection & Enjoyment •Strong desire for safe, inclusive, and barrier-free access to trails, beaches, and green spaces. •Emphasis on accessibility for all ages and abilities, including washrooms, shaded areas, and mobility-friendly paths. •Public access must remain a priority over privatization or exclusive development. Cultural Heritage Preservation •Mixed reactions: some support celebrating Indigenous and local history, while others question vague or performative approaches. •Calls for authentic storytelling, Indigenous consultation, and preservation of historic sites like West Beach cottages. Economic Viability •Support for small-scale, local businesses (e.g., cafés, markets, rentals) that complement public use. •Strong opposition to large-scale commercial or residential development, especially condos and high-rises. •Concerns about increased traffic, loss of green space, and strain on infrastructure. Design Excellence •Support for thoughtful, sustainable design that enhances natural beauty and community use. •Desire for charming, well-integrated spaces—not overbuilt or overly commercialized environments. Community Priorities DRA F T Page 129 Page 13 • Preserve nature first: Environmental protection must guide all decisions. • Access for all: Ensure equitable, safe, and inclusive public use. • Limit commercialization: Focus on community benefit, not profit. • Celebrate heritage meaningfully: Engage Indigenous voices and protect historic character. DRA F T Page 130 Page 14 Q.8: What principles do you think might be missing from the current draft? While the current draft guiding principles are broadly supported, residents identified gaps to be addressed to ensure the waterfront strategy is inclusive, sustainable, and community driven. These missing principles reflect a desire for stronger environmental protections, Indigenous engagement, infrastructure planning, and long-term stewardship. Key Themes Climate Resilience & Environmental Integrity •Calls to expand environmental stewardship to include climate adaptation, erosion control, and protection of biodiversity. •Emphasis on natural assets as essential infrastructure. •Strong opposition to overdevelopment and privatization of green space. Indigenous Engagement & Cultural Inclusion •Requests for explicit inclusion of Indigenous voices, history, and stewardship. •Desire for co-design, land acknowledgment, and cultural education. Community-Centered Planning •Principle of resident-first development: protect existing communities, avoid one- size-fits-all approaches. •Need for community trust, transparency, and ongoing engagement in decision - making. •Concerns about displacement, gentrification, and lack of consultation. Infrastructure & Accessibility •Missing focus on transit integration, safe bike/pedestrian access, and parking. •Suggestions for universal design, shaded areas, washrooms, and year-round usability. •Calls for safety measures like lighting, emergency access, and enforcement. Local Economic Support •Support for small-scale, local businesses over large commercial ventures. •Requests for year-round economic viability through tourism, recreation, and community events. Youth & Education •Desire for child-friendly spaces, youth engagement, and educational programming. •Suggestions for school partnerships, nature education, and interactive learning zones. Community Priorities DRA F T Page 131 Page 15 • Protect nature and heritage: Avoid irreversible damage to ecosystems and historic sites. • Include all voices: Indigenous, youth, seniors, and residents must be part of the process. • Plan realistically: Infrastructure, safety, and accessibility must match growth. • Keep it public: Guard against privatization and ensure equitable access for all. DRA F T Page 132 Page 16 One Connected Waterfront – Five Distinct Experiences: Courtice Waterfront Park The vision: a new waterfront community featuring a prestigious (min) 16-hectare/39- acre Courtice Waterfront Park – bigger than the former Bowmanville Zoo lands. The park would significantly increase public access to Lake Ontario, offer year -round recreational opportunities, preserve the entire shoreline, and enhance the existing trail network. Q.9: How much do you agree or disagree with the vision for the Courtice Waterfront Park? On a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents rated the vision for the Courtice Waterfront Park 4.03. DRA F T Page 133 Page 17 Q.10: What aspects of the Courtice Waterfront do you find most appealing or concerning, and why? The Courtice Waterfront is seen as a rare and valuable opportunity to create a landmark public space that balances environmental preservation, recreational access, and community well-being. While many residents are excited about the potential for trails, year-round activities, and shoreline protection, there are concerns about overdevelopment, infrastructure strain, and the loss of natural character. Key Themes Environmental Preservation •Widespread support for preserving the shoreline, protecting habitats, and enhancing natural features. •Concerns about loss of biodiversity, disruption of ecosystems, and greenwashing. •Desire for naturalized landscapes, shade, and minimal interference with existing nature. Public Access & Recreation •Enthusiasm for year-round recreational opportunities, including trails, splash pads, and family-friendly amenities. •Calls for safe, inclusive access via walking, biking, and transit—especially across barriers like Hwy 401 and rail lines. •Interest in connecting Courtice to broader trail networks and waterfront destinations. Opposition to Housing & Overdevelopment •Strong resistance to high-density housing, condos, and commercial sprawl near the waterfront. •Fears of traffic congestion, infrastructure overload, and loss of peace and quiet. •Preference for parks over residential expansion, especially south of Hwy 401. Balanced Economic Activity •Support for small-scale, local businesses (e.g., cafés, ice cream shops) that complement public use. •Concerns about over-commercialization and prioritizing profit over public benefit. Community Priorities •Preserve nature first: Protect shoreline and ecosystems from overuse. •Build for people, not profit: Prioritize public access and recreation. •Design for long-term use: Ensure infrastructure supports growth sustainably. •Keep it local: Avoid turning the waterfront into a tourist-only destination.DRA F T Page 134 Page 18 Making the Courtice Waterfront Park a Reality The Clarington Waterfront Strategy is a long-term vision, but some key decisions are already on the horizon—like the draft Courtice Waterfront and Energy Park Secondary Plan. The draft plan includes the creation of the prestigious 16-hectare/39-acre Courtice Waterfront Park noted in the previous question. To bring this park to life, a new residential neighbourhood (2,500 residential units for 4,800 residents) would need to be developed – similar to how other waterfront parks in Clarington were made possible. Why? Only a small portion of the Courtice waterfront is publicly owned. The rest is privately held, and the municipality cannot afford to purchase the land outright without placing a significant financial burden on taxpayers. However, through the development of a new neighbourhood, Clarington would be able to: • Secure the Courtice waterfront and protect the environmentally sensitive lands • Create a vibrant waterfront park and expand the trail network • Support essential infrastructure, including transportation and sewer/water upgrades New communities help fund the parks, trails, infrastructure, and public spaces that improve the quality of life for everyone. Q.11: How much do you support or oppose the creation of a new residential community (including shopping, dining, and services) to help fund and acquire land for the 16-hectare/39-acre Courtice Waterfront Park? On a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents rated support for the development of a new residential community 3.36. DRA F T Page 135 Page 19 Q.12: What factors influenced your level of support or opposition to this proposal? Residents are divided on the proposal to fund the 16-hectare Courtice Waterfront Park through the creation of a new residential community. While the majority support the idea in principle—recognizing the need for funding and infrastructure—others express strong opposition due to concerns about environmental impact, overdevelopment, and loss of public access. Key Themes Support for the Park, Caution About the Trade-Off • Broad support for the Courtice Waterfront Park itself—especially its potential for public access, recreation, and shoreline preservation. • Many residents are willing to accept development if it guarantees the park’s creation and protects sensitive lands. • Others feel the park should not be contingent on residential growth, especially near the shoreline. Concerns About Residential Development • Strong opposition to high-density housing, especially condos and tall buildings near the waterfront. • Fears of loss of natural character, increased traffic, and strain on infrastructure (schools, healthcare, roads). • Worries that development will privatize access or prioritize profit over public benefit. Mixed Views on Shopping & Dining • Some support small-scale, local businesses that enhance the park experience. • Others oppose commercialization, preferring nature-focused amenities and quiet public spaces. Environmental & Infrastructure Priorities • Calls for strong environmental safeguards, including habitat protection and sustainable design. • Emphasis on phased infrastructure delivery—schools, transit, and services must come first. • Desire for transparent planning, community oversight, and enforceable commitments from developers. Community Priorities DRA F T Page 136 Page 20 • Park First: Guarantee the waterfront park before any residential development. • Protect Nature: Preserve shoreline, wetlands, and wildlife habitats. • Build Responsibly: Ensure infrastructure matches growth and avoids overburdening services. • Keep It Public: Maintain open access and avoid exclusive or gated communities. DRA F T Page 137 Page 21 Bowmanville Waterfront The vision for the Bowmanville waterfront includes three key elements: • Protect and improve environmentally sensitive landscapes and natural heritage areas, including the Bowmanville Westside Marshes Conservation Area. • Position Port Darlington West Beach Park as Clarington's main beach, with excellent access to the water and passive/active onsite programs and amenities (i.e. beach volleyball, boardwalks, playground).  • Reimagine Port Darlington East Beach Park as an enhanced and accessible waterfront park.  Q.13: How much do you agree or disagree with the vision for Bowmanville waterfront? On a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents rated the vision for the Bowmanville Waterfront 3.98. DRA F T Page 138 Page 22 Q.14: What aspects of the Bowmanville waterfront vision do you find most appealing or concerning, and why? The Bowmanville waterfront vision is widely supported for its emphasis on environmental protection, improved public access, and recreational amenities. However, residents raised critical concerns about infrastructure limitations, environmental risks, and the need for clearer planning and community consultation. Key Themes Environmental Protection •Strong support for protecting the Bowmanville Westside Marshes Conservation Area and other sensitive landscapes. •Concerns about erosion, habitat disruption, and the impact of increased human activity. •Calls for naturalized design, shoreline restoration, and restrictions on motorized watercraft. Beach & Recreation Enhancements •Enthusiasm for making Port Darlington West Beach Clarington’s main beach, with amenities like boardwalks, volleyball courts, and playgrounds. •Support for reimagining East Beach as a more accessible and inclusive space. •Suggestions for year-round programming, food vendors, and family-friendly features. Marina & Boat Launch •Many residents want the Bowmanville Marina revitalized and a primary boat launch located here instead of Newcastle. •Concerns about the decrepit state of the marina, lack of dredging, and missed opportunities for waterfront tourism. Infrastructure & Accessibility •Repeated concerns about limited road access, parking, and traffic congestion, especially at West Beach. •Calls for sidewalks, bike paths, public transit, and improved signage. •Emphasis on accessibility for seniors, children, and people with disabilities. Community Impact & Preservation •Mixed views on development—some support small businesses and amenities, others oppose commercialization or displacement of residents. DRA F T Page 139 Page 23 •Strong desire to preserve heritage cottages, maintain quiet natural areas, and avoid over-tourism. Community Priorities •Protect nature first: Marshes, wetlands, and shoreline must be preserved. •Make it usable: Clean beaches, safe access, and inclusive amenities. •Revitalize smartly: Restore the marina, improve infrastructure, and avoid overbuilding. •Respect residents: Engage locals, preserve heritage, and balance tourism with livability. DRA F T Page 140 Page 24 Newcastle Waterfront Newcastle waterfront's vision includes a vibrant marina village with waterfront living and enhanced public spaces: •Create a municipal-wide gateway park to the waterfront, featuring public art installations, a boardwalk, food services, passive/active water programs. •Position the Port of Newcastle Park on Lakebreeze Drive as a resilient shoreline park with flexible program spaces (i.e. outdoor fitness areas). •Position Bond Head Park as a primary boat launch area. Q.15: How much do you agree or disagree with the vision for Newcastle waterfront? On a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents rated the vision for the Newcastle Waterfront 3.76. DRA F T Page 141 Page 25 Q.16: What aspects of the Newcastle waterfront vision do you find most appealing or concerning, and why? The Newcastle waterfront vision—featuring a gateway park, resilient shoreline, and primary boat launch—has sparked both enthusiasm and concern. While many residents support improved public spaces and amenities, there is strong opposition to designating Bond Head Parkette as a primary boat launch due to its size, infrastructure limitations, and impact on the local community. Key Themes Public Space & Recreation • Broad support for a municipal-wide gateway park with boardwalks, public art, food services, and water programs. • Interest in outdoor fitness areas, splash pads, and family-friendly amenities. • Desire for connectivity between waterfront areas via trails and boardwalks. Bond Head Parkette Concerns • There is opposition to making Bond Head Parkette a primary boat launch: • Too small to accommodate increased traffic and trailers. • Limited parking, narrow roads, and no sewage infrastructure. • Environmental risks to mature trees, wildlife habitats, and shoreline. • Loss of community character and peaceful atmosphere. • Safety concerns due to speeding, congestion, and lack of enforcement. Local Economy & Amenities • Support for small-scale commercial development (e.g., cafés, restaurants, shops). • Calls for revitalizing the marina, improving boat docking, and adding waterfront dining. • Concerns about over-commercialization and preserving Newcastle’s small-town charm. Environmental Stewardship • Emphasis on resilient shoreline design, erosion control, and habitat protection. • Requests for clean beaches, better waste management, and ecological education. • Calls to preserve natural areas and avoid excessive development. Infrastructure & Accessibility • Concerns about parking shortages, traffic, and lack of public transit. DRA F T Page 142 Page 26 •Need for accessible washrooms, seating, and senior-friendly design. •Suggestions for bike paths, pedestrian bridges, and trail connectivity. Community Priorities •Protect Bond Head: Preserve its heritage, peace, and ecological integrity. •Build smartly: Ensure infrastructure matches growth and avoids overburdening services. •Enhance public use: Focus on inclusive, nature-friendly recreation. •Respect residents: Engage locals, avoid displacement, and maintain livability. DRA F T Page 143 Page 27 Agricultural Heritage The waterfront lands between Newcastle and Port Granby are envisioned as a celebrated agricultural heritage hub with preserved food production traditions, opportunities for agri-tourism, continued environmental stewardship and public access to the waterfront. New access points to the shoreline will include enhanced and accessible waterfront trails, rest stops, lookouts, public event spaces and passive activities to enjoy the scenic beauty of the Lake Ontario shoreline. Q.17: How much do you agree or disagree with the vision for an Agricultural Heritage area? On a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents rated the vision for the Agricultural Heritage area 4.01. DRA F T Page 144 Page 28 Q.18: What aspects of the Agricultural Heritage vision do you find most appealing or concerning, and why? Position Statement The vision to celebrate Clarington’s agricultural heritage along the waterfront is widely supported, especially for its focus on preserving farmland, enhancing public access, and promoting environmental stewardship. However, residents expressed a need for clarity, balance, and protection—ensuring that development does not compromise the area's rural character or ecological integrity. Key Themes Preservation of Farmland & Food Traditions •Strong support for protecting fertile farmland and maintaining local food production. •Calls to prevent urban sprawl and subdivision development on agricultural lands. •Interest in educational opportunities, such as farm tours, signage, and community gardens. Public Access & Trails •Enthusiasm for accessible waterfront trails, lookouts, and rest stops. •Desire for passive recreation that respects the natural landscape. •Suggestions for bike paths, shade structures, and washroom facilities. Agri-Tourism & Local Economy •Support for farmers markets, local food vendors, and seasonal events. •Interest in celebrating agricultural diversity and connecting urban residents to rural traditions. •Concerns about over-commercialization and ensuring affordability and authenticity. Environmental Stewardship •Emphasis on protecting natural habitats, shoreline resilience, and biodiversity. •Requests for native plantings, wildflower gardens, and low-impact design. •Concerns about pollution, erosion, and impact on Port Granby Nature Reserve. Concerns & Considerations •Need for clearer definitions of “agricultural heritage hub” and “agri-tourism.” •Worries about traffic, parking, and garbage in rural areas. •Calls for community consultation, especially with local farmers and residents. DRA F T Page 145 Page 29 Community Priorities •Preserve farmland and protect food-producing landscapes. •Enhance access through trails and scenic lookouts, not large-scale development. •Support local agriculture through markets and education. •Respect nature and rural character—avoid overbuilding or disrupting ecosystems. DRA F T Page 146 Page 30 Port Granby Nature Reserve Through the previously endorsed Port Granby Nature Reserve Concept Plan, there are opportunities for continued environmental restoration, education and public access to this natural area. Here, residents can experience the beauty of a nature reserve through protected and preserved forests, meadows, wetlands, pastures and trails. Q.19: How much do you agree or disagree with the vision for Port Granby Nature Reserve? On a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), respondents rated the vision for the Port Granby Nature Reserve 4.14. DRA F T Page 147 Page 31 Q. 20: What aspects of the Port Granby Nature Reserve vision do you find most appealing or concerning, and why? Position Statement The Port Granby Nature Reserve vision—focused on environmental restoration, education, and public access—is widely supported. Residents value the opportunity to experience protected natural landscapes, but many emphasize the need for minimal impact, controlled access, and preservation of ecological integrity. Key Themes Environmental Restoration & Protection •Strong support for preserving forests, wetlands, meadows, and pastures. •Emphasis on restoration of previously contaminated lands and ongoing monitoring. •Calls to avoid overdevelopment and maintain the area’s wild, untouched character. Public Access & Trails •Enthusiasm for low-impact trails, lookouts, and quiet nature experiences. •Support for educational signage, birdwatching, and passive recreation. •Concerns about garbage, vandalism, and overuse if access is not well-managed. Education & Stewardship •Interest in environmental education, especially for youth and schools. •Suggestions for Indigenous-led programming and interpretive features. •Desire for community involvement in stewardship and conservation efforts. Concerns & Considerations •Worries about public access compromising ecological restoration. •Requests for clear boundaries, limited infrastructure, and no commercial development. •Need for accessibility features for seniors and people with disabilities. Community Priorities •Preserve nature first: Restoration and protection must remain the top priority. •Limit impact: Trails and access should be light-touch and respectful of wildlife. •Educate & engage: Use the reserve as a platform for learning and stewardship. •Keep it quiet: Avoid turning the reserve into a busy recreational or tourist hub. DRA F T Page 148 Page 32 Final Thoughts Q.21: What thoughts, ideas, or feedback would you like to share about the overall Waterfront Strategy? The overall Waterfront Strategy is met with enthusiasm and cautious optimism. Residents appreciate the vision for connected, accessible, and environmentally responsible waterfronts, but stress the importance of preserving nature, limiting overdevelopment, and ensuring community-driven planning. Key Themes Environmental Protection First • Strong calls to prioritize nature, protect wetlands, forests, and wildlife. • Concerns about residential development, especially near sensitive areas like Courtice and Bond Head. • Emphasis on climate resilience, shoreline restoration, and green infrastructure. Public Access & Recreation • Support for trails, boardwalks, rest stops, and waterfront parks. • Desire for year-round amenities like splash pads, skating rinks, and outdoor fitness. • Requests for accessible design for seniors, children, and people with disabilities. Community Engagement & Equity • Calls for ongoing public consultation, especially with waterfront residents and Indigenous communities. • Emphasis on inclusive spaces for families, youth, and diverse cultural groups. • Concerns about over-tourism, affordability, and preserving local character. Development & Infrastructure • Mixed views on housing—some support smart growth, others oppose waterfront residential expansion. • Need for better infrastructure: parking, transit, washrooms, and traffic management. • Suggestions for small businesses, farmers markets, and local economic opportunities. Connectivity & Vision • Strong support for a connected waterfront trail linking Courtice, Bowmanville, and Newcastle. DRA F T Page 149 Page 33 •Desire for distinct experiences across districts, unified by a shared identity. •Calls for bold, creative planning that reflects Clarington’s unique landscape and heritage. Community Priorities •Protect nature before expanding access or development. •Design for people: safe, inclusive, and accessible public spaces. •Think long-term: sustainable growth, climate adaptation, and cultural preservation. •Listen to residents: meaningful engagement, transparency, and responsiveness. DRA F T Page 150 Page 34 Demographics: Q.22: What area of Clarington do you live in? Most respondents reside in Bowmanville (37%), followed by Courtice (30%), Newcastle (23%), rural (4%), and Orono (1%). 4% of respondents reside outside of Clarington. DRA F T Page 151 Page 35 Q.23: How long have you lived in Clarington? Most respondents are long-term residents that have lived in Clarington for 25+ years (30%), followed by 5-14 years (30%), and 15-24 years (20%). DRA F T Page 152 Page 36 Q.24: Age Group The survey collected feedback from a wide range of age groups: from 15 years old to 85+. Most respondents fell between 30-49 years old. DRA F T Page 153 Appendix B C Waterfront Lands Analysis DRA F T Page 154 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington Clarington Waterfront Strategy 2022 SWOT and Land Analysis DRA F T Page 155 Waterfront Strategy Study Area Clarington Waterfront StrategyDRA F T Page 156 Clarington Waterfront Strategy Achievements 1992 2022 DRA F T Page 157 Clarington Waterfront Strategy Achievements 1992 20222022 DRA F T Page 158 Bridging the Strategy Carry Forward •Ecosystem approach to land use planning (principles) •Identifying waterfront character sub-areas Update Content •Study area boundary •Purpose •Planning context •Vision & priorities •Context & profile •Goals & objectives •Greenway system •Park & tourism focal nodes •Trails New Content •Summary of 1992 waterfront strategy outcomes •SWOT analysis •Key strategic directions •Three waterfront place conceptual designs •Design guidelines & standards •Cost estimate & phasing •Recommended strategies & policy directions •Implementation plan Clarington Waterfront StrategyDRA F T Page 159 •Ecosystem land use planning approach •Principles 1.Clean – natural processes 2.Green – healthy ecosystem 3.Connected - greenways 4.Open - views 5.Accessible – nodes and areas 6.Useable – public/private sector mix 7.Diverse – landscape and land uses 8.Affordable – all opportunities and facilities 9.Attractive – experiences Clarington Waterfront Strategy 1992 Waterfront Strategy Principles DRA F T Page 160 Existing Uses Clarington Waterfront StrategyDRA F T Page 161 Clarington Waterfront Strategy SWOT Analysis – Policy & Land Use Planning •Strong policies on ecological landscape approach and vision •Waterfront Places as Priority Intensification Areas •Cultural Heritage Landscape Importance •Courtice Waterfront and Energy Park Secondary Plan •Lack of design guidelines (Port Darlington and Courtice) •Some residential development subject to significant erosion and flood hazards •Insufficient hazard mapping in Official Plan •Strengthened policies on the high quality public realm, tourism node, continuous open space system, •Implementation of Secondary Plans •Port Granby Nature Reserve proposal •Lack of urban design guidance •Regulatory Shoreline Area subject to natural hazards •Potential land use compatibility issues with waste / wastewater infrastructure Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats S W O T DRA F T Page 162 Natural Heritage System Clarington Waterfront StrategyDRA F T Page 163 Clarington Waterfront Strategy SWOT Analysis – Natural Heritage System •Protection and conservation of the Lake Ontario Shoreline •Protection of Natural Heritage features and sustaining ecological health •Protection of Provincially Significant Wetlands and ANSIs •Highway 401 and railways as physical barriers separating terrestrial and waterfront ecosystems •Lack of natural land cover •Impacts of agriculture and urban land uses •Restoration of the surplus Federal lands at Port Granby •Investment in wildlife/people movement corridors to Lake across physical barriers •Regional wildlife habitat corridor (2 km) and coastal habitat improvements •Diverse land use and recreational uses impact coastal wetlands, habitat, vegetation and beach communities •Development of Energy Park may impact wildlife corridor Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats S W O T DRA F T Page 164 Coastal Functions Clarington Waterfront StrategyDRA F T Page 165 Clarington Waterfront Strategy SWOT Analysis – Coastal Functions •Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan (2020) - coastal hazard mapping, summaries and recommendations for each Reach within Clarington •Shoreline development located within hazardous areas, greater risk for flooding, erosion and unstable slopes •Individual coastal hazard works •Failing infrastructure •Channels infilling •Restricting development and shoreline hardening •Avoid > Accommodate> Retreat > Protect •Public education and building resiliency •Continual swings in high and low lake levels observed; higher 100 year flood elevation •Higher erosion and flood limits •Failing infrastructure •Structural and property damage Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats S W O T DRA F T Page 166 Parks, Open Space & Placemaking Clarington Waterfront StrategyDRA F T Page 167 Clarington Waterfront Strategy SWOT Analysis – Parks, Open Space and Placemaking •Increase in municipal waterfront lands •Proposed Port Granby Nature Reserve - expansion of open space system •Allocation of park lands in waterfront urban areas •Limited navigability of channels in Bowmanville Creek and Graham Creek •Limited public access around large industrial / utility waterfront facilities •Lack of transportation, parks development and parking strategy •More suitable boat launch location(s) •Acquisition of additional lands •Placemaking and visitor amenities at key destinations •Improving physical accessibility, telling the indigenous history, and signage •Privatization of shoreline access (physical and visual) •Natural hazard impact on public spaces and park infrastructure •Population growth Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats S W O T DRA F T Page 168 Cultural Heritage Resources Clarington Waterfront StrategyDRA F T Page 169 Clarington Waterfront Strategy SWOT Analysis – Cultural Heritage Resources •Listed built heritage resources, cemeteries and archaeological sites •Significant indigenous history •Lack of guidance and protection for Port Granby, Port Darlington and Port of Newcastle, significant waterfront landscapes and views to Lake Ontario •Lack of awareness of indigenous knowledge and historical waterfront uses •Recommendations on strengthening protection of Clarington’s cultural heritage resources •Interpretation and education on waterfront’s history •New development or redevelopment of significant waterfront landscapes •Loss of cultural heritage resources Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats S W O T DRA F T Page 170 Vehicular Access Clarington Waterfront StrategyDRA F T Page 171 Transit Access Clarington Waterfront StrategyDRA F T Page 172 Clarington Waterfront Strategy SWOT Analysis – Vehicular & Transit •Future connections to the GO Stations (Courtice Rd. and Bowmanville Ave.) •Expanded transit services to growth area in Bowmanville towards the waterfront •Numerous Highway 401 road crossings •Highway 401 and railways are a physical barrier •Transit service gaps •Resolution of Highway 401 conflicts conceptually at Courtice Waterfront and Energy Park •Establishment of transit routes to gateway nodes •At-grade crossings with the CN Rail •Single lane underpasses (CN Rail) •Narrow underpasses (Highway 401)) Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats S W O T DRA F T Page 173 Active Mobility Clarington Waterfront StrategyDRA F T Page 174 Clarington Waterfront Strategy SWOT Analysis – Active Mobility •Part of larger vision for the Great Lakes Waterfront Trail (GLWT) •Continuous west-east GLWT, with three connections to the Regional Cycling Network •Recent north-south connection via Bowmanville Creek Valley •Limited access for a continuous GLWT along the shoreline •Limited north- south and off-road trail connections •Irregular access to amenity spaces •Additional north-south trail linkages •Improvement to signage and use safety •Hydro One Corridor trail and park connections •Improved experience •Rider safety without road shoulders to provide buffer •Proximity of trail system to the eroding beach and bluff shorelines Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats S W O T DRA F T Page 175 Servicing Infrastructure Clarington Waterfront StrategyDRA F T Page 176 Clarington Waterfront Strategy SWOT Analysis – Servicing Infrastructure •Independent stormwater management facilities located in existing developments •Well established water sewer and sanitary sewer networks within Bowmanville and Newcastle urbanized areas •Sanitary sewers located near or through public lands •Little to no urban storm sewer network •Increased complexity with infrastructure crossing over Highway 401 and railway lines •Low Impact Development; stormwater viewed as a resource •Run water network along publically owned land to make it easier to tie into existing networks •Challenges related to coordination with other landowners for water and sanitary servicing •Impacts to Species at Risk for new or expanding developments Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats S W O T DRA F T Page 177 Economic Opportunities Assessment (draft) October 4,2022DRA F T Page 178 Guiding Principles of this Assignment Identify Market Opportunities Establish Key Activity Nodes Stimulate DiscussionDRA F T Page 179 A unique waterfront that reflects the needs of Clarington DRA F T Page 180 Opportunity Incubators Existing components of Clarington’s Waterfront have the potential to be kernels for developing landmark destinations within the municipality’s waterfront plan. • • • ••• • • •DRA F T Page 181 Opportunity Incubators Future growth in the south-end of Clarington will generate public demand for additional amenities along the municipality’s waterfront. • • • • • • • •• DRA F T Page 182 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES SOURCE: Region of Durham DRA F T Page 183 Clarington’s waterfront has a foundation of recreation trails that are already used for biking activity. On-going investments that improve the municipality’s trail network, particularly along the waterfront would increase visitor traffic, stimulate active transportation and expand the profile of cycling-oriented tourism. Cycling Tourism SOURCE: Canadian Cycling Magazine DRA F T Page 184 Cycling Market • • • • •DRA F T Page 185 Bike Supportive Businesses •SOURCE: Bicycling.com DRA F T Page 186 Apple Orchards • • • DRA F T Page 187 Hard Cidery / Hard Cider Mill Ontario is one of the largest craft cider-producing provinces in Canada. There is an absence of a dedicated Hard Cidery in Clarington. • • • • • • • • • • •DRA F T Page 188 Mobile Food Services (Food Trucks) Mobile food services can be used to help fill the void in areas that are not well -served by restaurants. Working in partnership or under a co-ordinated umbrella, they provide a unique and scalable destination point. •Future South Courtice Village Core •Port Darlington Road Vacant Lands •Food Truck Alley, Bowmanville •181 King Street East, Bowmanville •Food Corral –North OshawaDRA F T Page 189 RECREATIONAL NODES SOURCE: Municipality of Dysart et al. DRA F T Page 190 Water Activities • Focus on select areas along the Clarington Waterfront that allow the public to safely access Lake Ontario. Provide opportunities to host activities and diversify offerings available for visitors to the area, transient boaters and other more occasional users. • • • • DRA F T Page 191 Garden Tourism Garden tourism continues to be a popular travel segment.It involves visits or travel to gardens, places or events which celebrate excellence in horticultural practices. It can provide opportunities to leverage the attraction of a garden experience, product, festival or event, raising the profile of an area as a destination. • • • • • • •DRA F T Page 192 MARINA OPERATIONS & FACILITIES SOURCE: Google Earth Imagery DRA F T Page 193 Marina, Boat Charters & Waterfront Experiences The Clarington Waterfront caters to seasonal boaters but could benefit from more diverse offerings for other visitors. • • • • • •DRA F T Page 194 A variety of distinct activities or special events can also provide an opportunity for municipal revenue generation but also create an opportunity to attract people to the waterfront through a featured experience. There are numerous events and facilities the municipality could offer to generate and draw individuals to the waterfront. Other Commercial Opportunities DRA F T Page 195 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: February 9, 2026 Report Number: PDS-015-26 Authored By: Alicia da Silva, Planner I, Community Planning Submitted By: Darryl Lyons, Deputy CAO, Planning and Infrastructure Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: Resolution Number: File Number: Report Subject: Intention to Pursue Heritage Designation – Multiple Properties on Centre Street, Bowmanville Recommendations: 1. That Report PDS-015-26, and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That the Clerk issue a Notice of Intention to Designate the following properties as a cultural heritage resource as individual designations under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; a. 38 Centre Street, Bowmanville b. 50 Centre Street, Bowmanville c. 54 Centre Street, Bowmanville d. 64 Centre Street, Bowmanville 3. That the Clerk prepare the necessary by-laws if no objection(s) are received within 30 days after the date of publication of the Notice of Intention or staff will report back to Council regarding objection(s); and 4. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-015-26 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Page 196 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report PDS-015-26 Report Overview The subject properties have been identified as containing significant heritage attributes, indicating they meets the designation criteria outlined in O.Reg 9/06 based on cultural heritage evaluations and consultation with the Clarington Heritage Committee (CHC). Municipality of Clarington Staff recommend the designation of the following properties under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act: 1. 38 Centre Street, Bowmanville 2. 50 Centre Street, Bowmanville 3. 54 Centre Street, Bowmanville 4. 64 Centre Street, Bowmanville Council holds the responsibility to designate a property when it concludes that the property meets the criteria outlined in Ontario Regulation 9/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act, indicating cultural heritage value or interest. Designation ensures the future of these significant cultural resources are appropriately conserved and continue to be an integral part of Clarington’s history. Report PDS-015-26 recommends the subject properties be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. 1. Background Introduction 1.1 Cultural heritage is important to reflect the history, traditions, and values of a community. It also contributes to a sense of place that fosters a community's identity and cohesion. 1.2 Clarington’s two Official Plans, Envision Durham, the Region of Durham Official Plan and the Clarington Official Plan contain policies that promote the protection and conservation of significant cultural heritage resources. These policies align with the goals of enhancing community health and safety and improving the quality of life for residents. 1.3 Council holds the responsibility to designate a property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) when it concludes that the property meets the criteria outlined in Ontario Regulation 9/06 (O.Reg 9/06), indicating cultural heritage value or interest. A property is required to meet two or more criteria outlined in O.Reg.9/06 to be designated. Bill 23 and the Municipal Register 1.4 The OHA was amended by the More Homes Built Faster Act (Bill 23), which came into effect on November 28, 2022. Bill 23 amended the OHA in that a non-designated listed Page 197 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report PDS-015-26 property on the Municipal Register must be removed from the Register after two years if no Notice of Intention to Designate has been issued. 1.5 Clarington has 49 listed properties on the Municipal Register that must be evaluated and a Notice of Intention to Designate the property (if warranted) given prior to January 1, 2027 or they will be automatically removed from the list. Evaluation of the listed properties is underway in accordance with the criteria under the OHA. 1.6 In the past months, three separate Staff reports have recommended designating a total of 23 properties under Part IV of the OHA including: a. PDS-035-25 which recommended designation of five properties, b. PDS-067-25 which recommended designation of one property, and c. PDS-003-26 which recommended designation of 17 properties. 1.7 The Clarington Heritage Committee (CHC) is actively reviewing the 33 remaining listed properties and will provide recommendations to Council to ensure all properties are assessed before the legislated deadline. Council provided budget for the completion of the evaluations in 2023. Properties Proposed to be Designated 1.8 The Clarington Heritage Committee (CHC) conducted a preliminary evaluation of the following properties which are listed on the Municipal Register. See Figures 1-6 below. Page 198 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PDS-015-26 Figure 1: Map of Subject Properties in Bowmanville, Ontario Page 199 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report PDS-015-26 1.9 Using the CHC subcommittee’s preliminary evaluation information as a foundation, Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. (ARA) conducted their own assessments and completed Cultural Heritage Evaluation Reports for the subject properties. Each ARA report concluded that the property possessed significant heritage attributes, met the designation criteria outlined in O. Reg. 9/06, and recommended that the property be designated under Part IV of the OHA. 1.10 The Statement of Significance and List of Character-Defining Features for the subject properties can be found in Attachments 1-4 of this report. 2. Protecting Cultural Heritage Resources 2.1 The conservation of significant natural, cultural, and archaeological resources is a matter of provincial interest identified in the Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) 2024, which is reinforced by the OHA. Figure 2: 64 Centre Street Figure 3: 38 Centre Street Figure 4: 54 Centre Street Figure 5: 50 Centre Street Page 200 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report PDS-015-26 2.2 The PPS includes policies that promote the protection of heritage properties. According to Section 4.6, protected heritage properties can contain both built heritage resources or cultural heritage landscapes and shall be conserved. Planning authorities are encouraged to develop and implement proactive strategies for conserving significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes. Designation provides a mechanism to achieve the necessary protection. 3. Legislation Ontario Heritage Act 3.1 The OHA empowers a municipality to pass a by-law to designate properties that it considered to be of cultural heritage significance, in consultation with its Heritage Committee. The CHC supports the designation of the subject properties. 3.2 The OHA outlines the process to designate a property. Now that the CHC has recommended the designation to Council, the next step in the designation process (should Council support the designation) is publishing the Notice of Intention to Designate in the locally circulated newspaper and the municipal website. A summary description of the heritage designation process is found in Attachment 5 of this report. 3.3 Once a property is designated by by-law under Part IV of the OHA, the property owner is required to obtain consent for any proposed significant alterations to the building’s heritage features that are listed in the designation by-law, or for demolition of all or part of the structure, or its significant attributes. Envision Durham: Durham Region Official Plan 3.4 Envision Durham, the Durham Region Official Plan, outlines objectives for complete communities, which includes promoting the conservation, protection and enhancement of built and cultural heritage resources and landscapes. This section encourages municipalities to utilize the OHA to conserve, protect and enhance the built and cultural heritage resources of the municipality. 3.5 Envision Durham prioritizes the recognition, conservation, and enhancement of cultural heritage such as downtowns, historical areas, scenic lookout areas, archaeological sites or natural elements that are valued together for their interrelationship, meaning or association with the community. Clarington Official Plan 3.6 Promoting cultural heritage conservation is identified as a goal to foster civic pride and a sense of place, strengthen the local economy and enhance the quality of life for Clarington residents. Section 8 of the Clarington Official Plan, 2018 directs the designation of cultural heritage resources under Part IV of the OHA, with assistance from the CHC, in support of achieving the Municipality’s cultural heritage objectives. Page 201 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report PDS-015-26 4. Communications 4.1 Prior to completing the Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report for the listed properties, a letter was sent to the property owners of the subject properties in September 2024 inviting them to a heritage information session which took place in October 2024. They were also notified that the municipality was starting the heritage evaluation process for their property. 4.2 Staff communicated with the subject property owners via registered mail sharing that Cultural Heritage Evaluation Reports had been completed on their properties and offering to provide a copy of the reports. Property owners were invited to contact Planning and Infrastructure Services staff to discuss the consultant’s evaluation. They were also invited to attend the Clarington Heritage Committee meeting either virtually or in-person when the report was being discussed. 4.3 Property owners have been notified of the CHC’s recommendations and that a staff report would be presented to the Planning & Development Committee February 9, 2026, recommending the designation of the subject properties under Part IV of the OHA. One property owner has engaged with Staff, and none of the subject property owners have expressed objection to designation. 5. Properties Recommended for Designation 5.1 This section provides an overview of each property recommended for designation. 64 Centre Street 5.2 64 Centre Street is located on the west side of Centre Street in Bowmanville. The property contains of a two-storey brick building constructed between 1877 and 1886 in the Second Empire architectural style. 5.3 The property has design value as a rare and representative example of a residential building constructed in the Second Empire architectural style in Bowmanville. The property is also important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape along Centre Street, located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. 5.4 The Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report indicates the property meets the designation criteria and recommends the property be designated. The report was circulated to the CHC and was reviewed by Staff. 5.5 The CHC passed Motion 25.76 in December of 2025 to recommend to Council the designation of the property under Part IV of the OHA. Staff notified the property owner of the Committee recommendation. 5.6 See Attachment 1 for the detailed Statements of Significance and List of Character- Defining Features. Page 202 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report PDS-015-26 38 Centre Street 5.7 38 Centre Street is located on the west side of Centre Street in Bowmanville. The subject property contains a two-storey building constructed between 1879 and 1891 in the Italianate architectural style. 5.8 The property has design value as a representative example of a residential building constructed in the Italianate architectural style. The property is also important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape along Centre Street, located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. 5.9 The Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report indicates the property meets the designation criteria and recommends the property be designated. The report was circulated to the CHC and was reviewed by Staff. 5.10 The CHC passed Motion 25.77 in December of 2025 to recommend to Council the designation of the property under Part IV of the OHA. Staff notified the property owner of the Committee recommendation. 5.11 See Attachment 2 for the detailed Statements of Significance and List of Character- Defining Features. 54 Centre Street 5.12 54 Centre Street is located on the west side of Centre Street in Bowmanville. The subject property contains a two-and-a-half storey building constructed in circa 1934 in the Tudor Revival architectural style. 5.13 The property has design value as a representative example of a residential building constructed in the Tudor Revival architectural style. The property is also important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape along Centre Street, located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. 5.14 The Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report indicates the property meets the designation criteria and recommends the property be designated. The report was circulated to the CHC and was reviewed by Staff. 5.15 The CHC passed Motion 25.79 in December of 2025 to recommend to Council the designation of the property under Part IV of the OHA. Staff notified the property owner of the Committee recommendation. 5.16 See Attachment 3 for the detailed Statements of Significance and List of Character- Defining Features. Page 203 Municipality of Clarington Page 9 Report PDS-015-26 50 Centre Street 5.17 50 Centre Street is located on the west side of Centre Street in Bowmanville. The subject property consists of a two-storey, red brick Italianate building constructed circa 1881. 5.18 The property has design value as a representative example of a residential building constructed in the Italianate architectural style. The property also has associative value for its direct association with William Browning Couch, a Bowmanville merchant and business owner who played a significant role in the commercial and civic matters and helped shape the community’s educational system in the late 19th century. The property is also important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape along Centre Street, located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. 5.19 The Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report indicates the property meets the designation criteria and recommends the property be designated. The report was circulated to the CHC and was reviewed by Staff. 5.20 The CHC passed Motion 25.80 in December of 2025 to recommend to Council the designation of the property under Part IV of the OHA. Staff notified the property owner of the Committee recommendation. 5.21 See Attachment 4 for the detailed Statements of Significance and List of Character- Defining Features. 6. Financial Considerations 6.1 Potential future financial consideration may be to hire external heritage consultants to provide evidence at the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) in support of designation if an appeal is made. External legal services may also be required in the event of any appeals to the OLT. 7. Strategic Plan 7.1 The Clarington Strategic Plan 2024-27 outlines the objectives to cultivate a strong, thriving, and connected community where everyone is welcome. Designation of the subject properties contributes to achieving one of the priorities (Connect 4.1) that promotes and supports local arts, culture, and heritage sectors. 8. Climate Change 8.1 Not Applicable. 9. Concurrence 9.1 Not Applicable. Page 204 Municipality of Clarington Page 10 Report PDS-015-26 10. Conclusion 10.1 The Clarington Heritage Committee and Staff are in support of the designation of the following properties under Part IV of the OHA: 1. 38 Centre Street, Bowmanville 2. 50 Centre Street, Bowmanville 3. 54 Centre Street, Bowmanville 4. 64 Centre Street, Bowmanville 10.2 Should no objections be received by the Municipal Clerk within 30 days of publishing the Notice of Intention to designate, the proposed by-law designating the properties will be forwarded to Council for approval. Alternatively, if an objection(s) is received, Staff will provide a report to Council. 10.3 Upon designation, the owners of the properties will be presented with a bronze plaque signifying the significance of the properties to the community and the Municipality as a whole. 10.4 It is respectfully recommended that the Recommendations be adopted as presented . Staff Contact: Alicia da Silva, Planner I, adasilva@clarington.net, 905-623-3379 ext. 2340 and Lisa Backus, Manager of Community Planning, lbackus@clarington.net, 905 -623-3379 ext. 2413. Attachments: Attachment 1 to PDS-015-26 Attachment 2 to PDS-015-26 Attachment 3 to PDS-015-26 Attachment 4 to PDS-015-26 Attachment 5 to PDS-015-26 Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 205 Attachment 1 to Report PDS-015-26 64 Centre Street, Bowmanville Statement of Significance and List of Character-Defining Features Description 64 Centre Street is located on the west side of Centre Street in Bowmanville, Municipality of Clarington. The property contains of a two-storey brick building constructed between 1877 and 1886 in the Second Empire architectural style. Physical/Design Value 64 Centre Street has design value as a rare and representative example of a residential building constructed in the Second Empire architectural style in Bowmanville. 64 Centre Street is a two-storey, three-bay, brick building coursed in what appears to be a Flemish bond on the façade and constructed overtop a fieldstone foundation. The Second Empire style is expressed in the style’s distinctive hip mansard roof with co ncave roof shape punctuated by arched dormers which creates a complete second storey. The ornate wide overhanging eaves showcasing an ornamental cornice with rhythmically placed wood brackets are also key characteristics of the Second Empire style, which draws its inspiration from the Italianate style. The main building follows an L-shaped plan with a balanced but asymmetrical composition. The rhythmically placed segmentally arched window opening showcase brick voussoirs laid in soldier bond and stone sills which are all features in keeping with the Second Empire architectural style. The building showcases a rectangular window topped by a segmentally arched transom with a decorative stain glass window and a one-storey canted bay window with bracketed cornice and segmentally arched windows both of which add to stylistic features of the building. 64 Centre Street was constructed between 1877 and 1866 and according to local historians, the building’s mansard roof, which is the quintessential characteristic of the Second Empire Style, is rare within the Town of Bowmanville. Contextual Value 64 Centre Street is important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape along Centre Street, located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. The lot lines and block layout of the historic Town was well established in the late -19th century as reflected in the commercial core found along King Street and the large presence of residences located along several side streets. The development of the residential area, which includes Centre Street, during this time played a significant ro le in the social and economic development and reflected the growth of the historic Town of Bowmanville. Located off or parallel to the commercial area along King Street, the buildings in the Town’s historic residential area are comprised of predominantly one to two-and-a-half storey residences, primarily brick construction and often showcase Page 206 2 ornate details. The location of the subject property on a along Centre Street, combined with unique stylistic features and legibility as a late -19th century style, support the character of the Centre Street streetscape and by extension the broader historic residential area. The historic character is reinforced by the presence of large mature trees and vegetations which consistently line both sides of Centre Street. When in bloom, the tree canopy is so robust it created a tunnel which reinforces the areas mature character, strengthens the continuity and relationship among houses, and provides an aesthetic appeal to the streetscape. 64 Centre Street was constructed between 1877 - 1886 and exhibits massing, style, and decorative details consistent with cohesive late 19th century and early 20th century character of the Centre Street streetscape which is further reinforced by the presence of a mature tree canopy. Description of Heritage Attributes 64 Centre Street has design value as a rare and representative example of a residential building constructed in the Second Empire architectural style in Bowmanville. The property contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: - Two-storey building constructed in the Second Empire architectural style - Brick construction - L-shaped plan with a balanced but asymmetrical composition - Hip mansard roof with concave roofline and arched dormers - Wide eaves with decorative cornice showcasing rhythmically placed wood brackets and arched dormers - Segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs - Main level of façade showcases a rectangular window topped by a segmentally arched transom with a decorative stain glass window - One-storey Bay window with hip roof and bracketed cornice 64 Centre Street is important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape associated located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. The property contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: - Two-storey building constructed in the Second Empire architectural style - Overall form, massing, and setback - Location on Centre Street The following heritage attributes were provided by the Clarington Heritage Committee at their meeting on December 16th, 2025: - U-shaped window crowns, single-storey front porch, and stone foundation - Notable past residents David and Roberta Higgon: o David Higgon was the Superintendent of the Ontario Training School for the Boys in the 1950s. Page 207 Attachment 2 to Report PDS-015-26 38 Centre Street, Bowmanville Statement of Significance and List of Character-Defining Features Description 38 Centre Street is located on the west side of Centre Street in the Town of Bowmanville, in the Municipality of Clarington. The subject property contains a two - storey building constructed between 1879 and 1891 in the Italianate architectural style . Physical/Design Value 38 Centre Street has design value as a representative example of a residential building constructed in the Italianate architectural style. 38 Centre Street is a two -storey, red brick building coursed in Flemish bond and finished with buff brick detailing w ith a balanced but asymmetrical composition. The buff brick detailing is not only on the voussoirs but is found along foundation line, under roofline, on the stepped quoins which frame the building and is a design feature often associated with the Italiana te style. The hip roof with wide overhanging eaves showcases rhythmically placed wood brackets which are the key characteristics of the Italianate style. The projecting section along the façade, and side elevation, showcase paired segmentally arched window openings accented with buff brick voussoirs on the upper level and a one -storey canted bay window topped by a truncated hip roof with slightly overhanging eaves and bracketed cornice on the main level which have tall, narrow windows accented by buff brick voussoirs in keeping with Italianate stylistic features. The prominent rectangular entrance opening is topped by a rectangular transom and flanked by a sidelight on one side only and protected by a small two-storey porch supported by large, wood columns with decorative capitals and includes wood railing. The remaining rhythmically placed windows have segmentally arched or rectangular window opening with buff brick voussoirs and are in keeping with the Italianate architectural style. Contextual Value 38 Centre Street is important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape along Centre Street, located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. The lot lines and block layout of the historic Town was well established in the late -19th century as reflected in the commercial core found along King Street and the large presence of residences located along several side streets. The development of the residential area, which includes Centre Street, during this time played a significant role in the social and economic development and reflected the growth of the historic Town of Bowmanville. Located off or parallel to the commercial area along King Street, the buildings in the historical Town located along the side streets are comprised of predominantly one to two-and-a-half storey residences, primarily brick construction and Page 208 2 often showcase ornate details. The location of the subject property fronting towards Centre Street, combined with unique stylistic features and legibility as a late-19th century style, support the character of the Centre Street streetscape and by extension the broader historic residential area. The historic character is reinforced by the presence of large mature trees and vegetations which consistently line both sides of Centre Street. When in bloom, the tree canopy is so robust it created a tunnel which re inforces the areas mature character, strengthens the continuity and relationship among houses, and provides an aesthetic appeal to the streetscape. 38 Centre Street was constructed between 1879 and 1891 and exhibits, massing, style, and decorative details consistent with the cohesive 19th century and early 20th century character of the Centre Street streetscape which is further reinforced by the presence of a mature tree canopy. Description of Heritage Attributes 38 Centre Street has design value as a representative example of a residential building constructed in the Italianate architectural style. The property contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: - Two-storey building constructed in the Italianate architectural style - Red brick construction with buff brick detailing o Buff brick detailing is found on voussoirs, foundation line, under roofline, and on stepped quoins - Balanced but asymmetrical composition - Hip roof with wide eaves with decorative cornice showcasing rhythmically placed wood brackets - Rectangular entranceway opening topped by a rectangular transom and flanked by a sidelight on one side only and protected by a small two-storey porch supported by large, wood columns with decorative capitals and includes wood railing - Bay windows with truncated hip roof, bracketed cornice and tall, narrow, window openings with buff brick voussoirs, topped by paired segmentally arched window with buff brick voussoirs found on façade and on side elevation - Rectangular and segmentally arched window openings with buff brick voussoirs 38 Centre Street is important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape along Centre Street, located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. The property contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: - Two-storey building constructed in the Italianate architectural style - Overall form, massing, and setback - Location on corner lot fronting towards Centre Street Page 209 3 The following heritage attributes were provided by the Clarington Heritage Committee at their meeting on December 16th, 2025: - Notable resident Doctor Keith Slemon o Dr. Slemon operated his medical practice from a dedicated space within the home, accessible through the side door on the north side of the property. - Two trees on the property which are over 30 centimetres in diameter o One tree fronting Centre St. o One tree fronting Lowe St. Page 210 Attachment 3 to Report PDS-015-26 54 Centre Street, Bowmanville Statement of Significance and List of Character-Defining Features Description 54 Centre Street is located on the west side of Centre Street, Bowmanville, in the Municipality of Clarington. The subject property contains a two-and-a-half storey building constructed in circa 1934 in the Tudor Revival architectural style. Physical/Design Value 54 Centre Street has design value as a representative example of a residential building constructed in the Tudor Revival architectural style. 54 Centre Street is a two-and-a-half storey, red brick building coursed in stretcher bond that follows a rectangular plan. The subject building is topped by a hip roof intersected by the distinctive jerkinhead featur e with boxed in return eaves along a portion of the façade. The Jerkinhead includes half timbering with stucco infill and paired windows openings with simple trim surrounds, which are distinguishing features associated with the Tudor Revival aesthetic and composition. The wide overhanging eaves showcase a simple cornice with plain frieze board and an ornate single stack brick chimney, with buff brick detailing is found on the side elevation adds to the Tudor Revival aesthetic. 54 Centre Street showcases a variety of window openings on the side elevations, however the notable façade ribbon windows include a four window ribbon accented by decorative trim and dentils on the main level which, while the upper level showcases an unadorned three window ribbon composition. In keeping with the Tudor Revival style, the off-centre formal entranceway has a rectangular opening topped by an ornated arched transom which is further accentuate by the classical inspired gable portico design that accentuates the arch and supported with ornate brackets. Contextual Value 54 Centre Street is important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape along Centre Street, located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. The lot lines and block layout of the historic Town was well established in the late-19th century as reflected in the commercial core found along King Street and the large presence of residences located along several side streets. The development of the residential area, which includes Centre Street, during this time played a significant role in the social and economic development and reflected the growth of the historic Town of Bowmanville. Located off or parallel to the commercial area along King Street, the buildings in the historical Town located along the side streets are comprised of predominantly one to two-and-a-half storey residences, primarily brick construction and often showcase ornate details. The location of the subject property on a along Centre Page 211 2 Street, combined with unique stylistic features and legibility as a late-19th century style, support the character of the Centre Street streetscape and by extension the broader historic residential area. The historic character is reinforced by the presence of large mature trees and vegetations which consistently line both sides of Centre Street. When in bloom, the tree canopy is so robust it created a tunnel which reinforces the areas mature character, strengthens the continuity and relationship among houses, and provides an aesthetic appeal to the streetscape. 54 Centre Street was constructed in 1934 and exhibits, massing, style, and decorative details consistent with cohesive late 19th century and early 20th century character of the Centre Street streetscape which is further reinforced by the presence of a mature tree canopy. Description of Heritage Attributes 54 Centre Street has design value as a representative example of a residential building constructed in the Tudor Revival architectural style. The property contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: - Two-and-a-half storey building constructed in the Tudor Revival architectural style - Red brick construction - Hip roof with wide overhanging eaves - Jerkinhead has boxed in eaves and includes half timbering with stucco infill and paired windows openings - Single stack red brick chimney, with buff brick detailing o Façade ribbon windows Four window ribbon accented by decorative trim and dentils on the main level o Unadorned three window ribbon composition on upper level - The off-centre formal entranceway with ornate arched transom - Classical inspired gable portico with arched design supported with wood brackets 54 Centre Street is important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape along Centre Street, located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. The property contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: - Two-and-a-half storey building constructed in the Tudor Revival architectural style - Overall form, massing, and setback - Location on Centre Street The following heritage attributes were provided by the Clarington Heritage Committee at their meeting on December 16th, 2025: - Charles Corner Stenhouse, a prominent architect active in both Oshawa and Bowmanville, designed the home in the 1930s. - Tree on the property which is over 30cm in diameter. Page 212 Attachment 4 to Report PDS-015-26 50 Centre Street, Bowmanville Statement of Significance and List of Character-Defining Features Description 50 Centre Street is located on the west side of Centre Street in Bowmanville, in the Municipality of Clarington. The subject property consists of a two -storey, red brick Italianate building constructed circa 1881. Physical/Design Value 50 Centre Street has design value as a representative example of a residential building constructed in the Italianate architectural style. 50 Centre Street follows a two-storey, three bay, massing and is constructed with red brick coursed in Flemish and Common bond. The subject building has a hip roof with wide overhanging eaves that showcase a simple cornice with plain frieze board and rhythmically placed wood brackets which are key defining characteristics which represent the Italianate style. The balance d but asymmetrical composition includes tall, narrow, paired rounded arch window openings with brick voussoir detailing located above and one -storey canted bay window which also houses tall narrow window openings and showcases a decorative cornice with dentil trim are also features associate with Italianate design. The centrally placed formal entrance is topped by a rectangular transom and flanked by a single sidelight is located under the open one-storey front porch with classical influences. The building also has rhythmically placed segmentally arched, windows with flat or “jack” voussoirs which are also in keeping with the Italianate architectural style. The building’s massing, composition, window placement, roofline and details make it legible as being of the Italianate architectural style. Historical/Associative Value 50 Centre Street has associative value for its direct association with William Browning Couch, a Bowmanville merchant and business owner who played a significant role in the commercial and civic matters and helped shape the community’s educational system in the late 19th century. W.B. Couch was born in Cornwall, England in 1879, and immigrated to Hampton in 1857, where he worked as a tailor. He eventually moved to Bowmanville and worked at the McClung Bros. general store before purchasing the store from the McClungs in 1882 and operating a dry goods and general store known as Couch, Johnston, & Cryderman with two other partners. The store remained in operation for several decades demonstrating the longevity his store had during the growth of Bowmanville throughout the late 19th and early 20th century. Page 213 2 W. B. Couch was also active in public and civic development of Bowmanville, particularly with the educational system. W.B. Couch joined the Bowmanville Public High School Board around 1882 and assisted in the planning and opening of a high school which was constructed in 1890. He also oversaw its replacement, which was built in 1929. He began serving as the school board’s chairman in 1906 and remained in that role for 25 years until his death in April 1931. W.B. Couch was active in the community, as Honourary President of the Canadian Men’s Club, a Freemason, active with the Trinity United Church. At the time of his passing, on April 13, 1931, W. B. Couch was Bowmanville’s second oldest resident, and his business was the oldest in Bowmanville. To honour his contributions in the community, a portrait of W.B. Cou ch, housed in the Bowmanville High School library, was unveiled at that location in December 1931. Contextual Value 50 Centre Street is important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape along Centre Street, located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. The lot lines and block layout of the historic Town was well established in the late -19th century as reflected in the commercial core found along King Street and the large presence of residences located along several side streets. The development of the residential area, which includes Centre Street, during this time played a significant ro le in the social and economic development and reflected the growth of the historic Town of Bowmanville. Located off or parallel to the commercial area along King Street, the buildings in the historical Town located along the side streets are comprised of predominantly one to two-and-a-half storey residences, primarily brick construction and often showcase ornate details. The location of the subject property on a along Centre Street, combined with unique stylistic features and legibility as a late -19th century style, support the character of the Centre Street streetscape and by extension the broader historic residential area. The historic character is reinforced by the presence of large mature trees and vegetations which consistently line both sides of Centre Street. When in bloom, the tree canopy is so robust it created a tunnel which reinforces the areas mature character, strengthens the continuity and relationship among houses, and provides an aesthetic appeal to the streetscape. 50 Centre Street was constr ucted circa 1881 and exhibits, massing, style, and decorative details consistent with cohesive late 19th century and early 20th century character of the Centre Street streetscape which is further reinforced by the presence of a mature tree canopy. Description of Heritage Attributes 50 Centre Street has design value as a representative example of a residential building constructed in the Italianate architectural style The property contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: - Two-storey building constructed in the Italianate architectural style Page 214 3 - Red brick construction coursed in a Flemish and Common bond - Asymmetrical but balanced composition - Hip roof with wide eaves adorned with decorative cornice showcasing rhythmically placed wood brackets - Two exterior, red brick chimneys, on west and north elevation finished with a corbelled cap and appear to be double fluted - Formal entranceway opening topped by a rectangular transom and one sidelight - Projecting section of façade’s main level contains a one-storey bay window with truncated hip roof and dentil trim in cornice, with tall and narrow rectangular window openings while the upper level has paired rounded windows with brick voussoirs - Rectangular, rounded, and segmental arch window openings with brick voussoirs - One-storey bay window on side elevation with decorative cornice with dentil trim, tall and narrow rectangular window openings and finished with truncated hip roof 50 Centre Street has associative value for its direct association with William Browning Couch, a Bowmanville merchant and business owner who played a significant role in the commercial and civic matters and helped shape the community’s educational system in the late 19th century. The property contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: - Two storey building constructed in the Italianate architectural style - Overall form, massing, and setback - Location on Centre Street 50 Centre Street is important in supporting the 19th and early 20th century residential streetscape along Centre Street, located within the historic Town of Bowmanville. The property contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: - Two-storey building constructed in the Italianate architectural style - Overall form, massing, and setback - Location on Centre Street The following heritage attributes were provided by the Clarington Heritage Committee at their meeting on December 16th, 2025: - Constructed as or near-identical counterpart to 21 Beech Street - Notable residents John McClung, W.B. Couch, and Dr. Charles Cattron - Upper window o Was originally a door with an external railing - Brick columns are most likely not original features - Working shutters Page 215 Designation Proposed Council consults with the Heritage Committee Council Decision: Proceed with Designation? Notice of Intention to Designate: Designation by-law passed Notice of Designation: •Served on property owner •Served on the Ontario Heritage Trust •Right to objection •Published in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act •Served on property owner •Served on the Ontario Heritage Trust •Served any person who objected •Right to appeal •Published in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act NO YES If NO objection within 30 days NO IF Property not designated If objection within 30 days Council to Reconsider Designation of Property Notice of Withdrawal Appeal to Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) within 30 days after publishing the Notice of Designation OLT Hearing and Decision Council Decision: Designate property YES If NO appeal the Designation By-Law comes into effect Attachment 5 to Report PDS-015-26 Designation Process by Municipal By-Law Page 216 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: February 9, 2026 Report Number: PDS-017-26 Authored by: Nicole Zambri, Principal Planner Submitted By: Darryl Lyons, Deputy CAO, Planning and Infrastructure Services Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: Resolution Number: File Number: ZBA2024-0008 and S-C-2024-0005 Report Subject: Applications for a Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision for 53 residential units at 1430 Prestonvale Road in Courtice Recommendations: 1. That Report PDS-017-26 and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That the Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted by Delpark Homes (Prestonvale) Inc., attached to Report PDS-0017-26, as Attachment 1, be approved; 3. That the Region of Durham Community Growth and Economic Development Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PDS-017-26 and Council’s decision; and 4. That all interested parties and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Page 217 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report PDS-017-26 Report Overview This report is recommending approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment submitted by Biglieri Group Ltd., on behalf of Delpark Homes (Prestonvale) Inc., to facilitate a proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision which proposes a total of 53 residential units. The Draft Plan of Subdivision shows 41 single detached lots, 12 townhouse units, an expansion to a part lot in Phase 1, the extension of Rosswell Drive, a new public road (Street A), a road widening along Prestonvale Road, and 0.3 m reserves. The proposed application would change the zoning on the subject lands from an Agricultural (A) Zone to several Urban Residential Zone Exception Zones to facilitate the development. Each zone is proposed to have site-specific performance standards. The subject lands are located on the west side of Prestonvale Road and south of Bloor Street in Courtice. The proposal is also within the Southwest Courtice Secondary Plan Area. 1. Application Details 1.1 Owner: Delpark Homes (Prestonvale) Inc. 1.2 Applicant: Biglieri Group Ltd. 1.3 Proposal: Zoning By-law Amendment To rezone the subject lands from: “Agricultural (A) Zone” to “Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-67) Zone” “Agricultural (A) Zone” to “Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-94) Zone” “Agricultural (A) Zone” to “Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-95) Zone” “Agricultural (A) Zone” to “Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-96) Zone” “Agricultural (A) Zone” to “Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R3-84) Zone” to permit the proposed residential development. Draft Plan of Subdivision Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision to permit 53 residential dwelling units consisting of 41 single detached units and 12 street townhouse units. 1.4 Area: 2.72 hectares (6.75 acres) 1.5 Location: 1430 Prestonvale Road, Courtice (see Figure 1) 1.6 Roll Number: 1817-010-070-02680 Page 218 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report PDS-017-26 Figure 1 – Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Surrounding Context Page 219 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PDS-017-26 2. Background 2.1 On July 5, 2024, the Biglieri Group Ltd., on behalf of Delpark Homes (Prestonvale) Inc., submitted applications for a zoning by-law amendment and draft plan of subdivision to permit the development of 60 residential units consisting of singles detached and street townhouse dwellings. 2.2 A Statutory Public Meeting was held on December 9, 2024, to provide background information regarding the applications and to obtain public comments. No one spoke in opposition of the application at the Public Meeting but a number of comments were received by Planning Staff. 2.3 Several discussions with the applicant and Staff occurred in an effort to address comments and resolve issues. The proposal was revised to increase the lot frontages for the single detached dwellings and reduce the number of townhouses proposed from 18 units to 12 units. The current Draft Plan now shows a total of 53 residential units. 2.4 The proposal is the second phase of the Millwood Trails community, with the first phase registered in October 2021 (40M-2704), see Figure 2. At that time, the rezoning and subdivision plan for the second phase was deferred given that the Southwest Courtice Secondary Plan update had not been completed and that the original Secondary Plan identified these lands as Future Urban Residential due to servicing constraints. 2.5 Since that time, the Southwest Courtice Secondary Plan has been approved, however Phase Two is still dependant on the timing of the delivery of the new sanitary sewer trunk from the Courtice Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP). Phase One had an opportunity to connect to services on Roy Nichols Drive but due to the topography of the site, Phase Two required the trunk sewer from the Courtice WPCP. In addition to this, water and stormwater to service this proposal is dependent on the development to the south (S-C-2022-0002 – Tribute Prestonvale Ltd.) to bring the services to the subject lands. Page 220 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report PDS-017-26 Figure 2 – Phases of Development Proposal; source: The Biglieri Group Ltd. 3. Land Characteristics and Surrounding Uses 3.1 The subject lands are located on the west side of Prestonvale Road and south of Bloor Street in the Courtice Urban Area. The lands are currently vacant with some treed areas along the north property line and bisecting the property. The subject lands have frontage on Prestonvale Road and the future extension of Rosswell Drive. 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North - Phase 1, which consists of single detached and townhouse dwellings. East - Prestonvale Road and beyond that, South Courtice Recreation Complex, single detached dwellings (including a designated heritage dwelling), agricultural lands (Prestonvale Tree Farm), and the Robinson Creek. South - Cultivated agricultural lands subject to development applications (SC-2022- 0002 and ZBA-2022-0003). Both of these applications have been approved. West - Natural heritage features (including a wetland) and a stormwater management pond beyond. Page 221 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report PDS-017-26 4. Provincial Policy Provincial Planning Statement (2024) 4.1 The Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) encourages planning authorities to create healthy, livable, and safe communities by accommodating an appropriate range and mix of housing types and development patterns, while making efficient use of land and infrastructure. Opportunities for redevelopment and intensification are to be promoted where it can be accommodated. 4.2 The PPS encourages a minimum density target of 50 residents and jobs per gross developable hectare in designated growth areas. The proposal would be achieving a gross density of approximately 53 people per hectare. 4.3 Healthy and active communities should be promoted by planning public streets to be safe, and meet the needs of pedestrians, foster social in teraction, and facilitate active transportation and community connectivity. Compact and diverse developments promote active modes of transportation such as walking and cycling. 4.4 The proposal is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement. 5. Official Plans Durham Region Official Plan (Envision Durham) 5.1 The Durham Region Official Plan designates the subject lands as “Community Areas.” 5.2 Community Areas are to be planned for a variety of housing types, sizes, and tenures, including singles and townhouse dwellings. These areas can also include population- serving uses and shall be developed in a compact form through higher densities and by intensifying and redeveloping existing areas. 5.3 To the west of the subject lands, are natural heritage features which is designated “Major Open Space Areas”. These lands are to be protected, enhanced, and conserved to ensure their ecological value is maintained. Development or site alteration is not permitted in Key Natural Heritage and Hydrologic Features, including any associated vegetation protection zone, as determined through an Environmental Impact Study. 5.4 An Environmental Impact Study was prepared by GeoProcess Research Associates Inc., dated June 6, 2024, in support of the applications. It should also be noted that the natural heritage features and associated minimum vegetation protection areas identified in the previous study were dedicated to the Municipality as part of Phase One. 5.5 The proposed development is also within an Ecologically Significant Groundwater Recharge Area and a Source Water Protection Area which are areas identified to protect groundwater systems and aquifers. Agency and Department comments indicate that they are satisfied that there will be no negative impacts to the Ground Water Recharge Area or the Source Water Protection Area as a result of this development. Page 222 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report PDS-017-26 5.6 The proposal conforms to the Regional Official Plan. Clarington Official Plan 5.7 The Clarington Official Plan (COP) designates the site Urban Residential and is within the Courtice Urban Area. The predominant land use within the Urban Residential designation is for housing purposes. A variety of densities, tenure and housing types are encouraged, generally up to 3 storeys in height. Detached dwellings, semi-detached dwellings, and townhouses are permitted, as proposed. 5.8 Prestonvale Road is identified as a Type C Arterial Road in the Region and Clarington Official Plan. There are no direct vehicle connections proposed to Prestonvale Road from this development. 5.9 The minimum density along arterial roads is 19 units per hectare and 13 units per hectare internal to the neighbourhood. The proposal has a density of 20 units per hectare and locates the denser built forms (townhouses) adjacent to the arterial road (Prestonvale Road). 5.10 The COP policies state that multi-unit residential development will be developed on the basis of the following site development criteria: a) Suitability of the size and shape of the site; b) Compatibility with the surrounding neighbourhood in terms of scale, massing, height and siting; c) Minimize impact of traffic on local streets; d) Multiple and direct vehicular accesses from public streets, without reliance on easements; e) Townhouses shall not be sited on opposite sides of the street in order to allow for sufficient on-street parking; f) Achieve a mixture of housing types and shall not replicate the same built form; and g) Street townhouses shall generally not comprise more than 6 attached units. 5.11 The proposed development meets the multi‑unit residential policies, with lot sizes consistent with Phase One and a mix of frontages supporting varied building types. It also conforms with the townhouse requirements, limiting blocks to six attached units and avoiding townhouses on opposite sides of the street. 5.12 An Environmental Impact Study (EIS) was prepared by the applicant given that wetlands and woodlands are present adjacent to the site (to the west). An EIS was prepared as part of the first phase of this development. The limits of the open space lands were determined through the study. These lands were dedicated to the Municipality as part of the registration of the first phase. An addendum report was prepared for the second phase and demonstrates that the proposed development is outside the natural heritage features and minimum required vegetation protection area (refer to Figure 3). Page 223 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report PDS-017-26 Figure 3 – Phases of Development in Relation to the Natural Heritage Features; Source: Savanta 5.13 About 0.5 hectares of cultural woodland will be removed as part of the second phase. The COP considers woodlands within settlement areas significant only when they exceed 1 hectares. Despite CUW1 not providing ecological function and not being included in the forest cover calculation of the subwatershed study, the addendum letter recommends that reforestation should be considered to areas identified as natural heritage system as compensation for the removal of the low quality woodlands. This will be a condition of the subdivision approval. 5.14 Section 23 of the Clarington Official Plan also provides criteria to evaluate the approval of residential developments in an urban area, including draft plans of subdivisions: a) Ensure sequential development of neighbourhoods b) Proposed development is adjacent to Centres or Built-up Aras c) The economical use and extension of all infrastructure and services d) Ensure it offers intensification; and e) Increase density for new neighbourhoods having regard for proposed measures to integrate into existing stable residential areas. Page 224 Municipality of Clarington Page 9 Report PDS-017-26 5.15 The policies in the Official Plan indicate that the Municipality may declare a residential draft plan of subdivision premature if the capital works and services required to service the lands are not within the Municipality’s current capital budget or 10 -year capital forecast. In this case, while there are a number of infrastructure expansion projects to service the proposed development, the timing of the services are within the current or 10 year capital forecast. 5.16 The proposal conforms to the Clarington Official Plan. Southwest Courtice Secondary Plan Area (Bayview Neighbourhood) 5.17 The subject lands are designated Low Density Residential in the approved Southwest Courtice Secondary Plan. The Secondary Plan was approved by the Region in November 2022. 5.18 Single detached and townhouse dwelling units are permitted up to three storeys. Townhouses are to account for 20% of the total number of units in the low-density residential designation, while singles and semi-detached dwellings are to make up 80%. This is an overall target for the entire designation in the Secondary Plan. The proposal consists of 22% townhouses and 78% singles, which is generally in conformity with the policies of the Secondary Plan. Private streets and private lanes are not permitted within the low-density designation. The proposed units will all have vehicle access off of Street A, which is proposed to be a public road. 5.19 The Secondary Plan also requires every development application to include a policy implementation monitoring report as part of a complete application. The monitoring report assesses the individual application in conjunction with the entire Secondary Plan in terms of density, estimated population, number of units, and amount of non - residential space and number of jobs. The applicant has provided the Policy Implementation Monitoring Report as part of the Planning Rational Addendum letter. 5.20 The proposal conforms to the Southwest Courtice Secondary Plan Area. 6. Zoning By-law 6.1 Zoning By-law 84-63 zones the subject lands as “Agriculture (A)”. A Zoning By-law Amendment is required to permit the proposed development which consists of single detached dwellings and street related townhouses. 6.2 The proposed rezoning would change the zoning on the subject lands from an “Agricultural (A) Zone” to various “Urban Residential Type Two (R2) Exception Zones” for the single detached dwellings and an “Urban Residential Type Three (R3) Exception Zone” for the street townhouse units. Each zone is proposed to have site-specific performance standards. 6.3 The proposed zoning by-law amendment includes a Holding (H) Symbol. The Holding would remain on the lands until the necessary conditions of draft approval and development agreements are in place for the Draft Plan of Subdivision. 6.4 A draft Zoning By-law is included as Attachment 1. Page 225 Municipality of Clarington Page 10 Report PDS-017-26 7. Summary of Background Studies Planning Rationale Report, prepared by Biglieri Group, May 2023, and Planning Rational Addendum Letter, Sept. 10, 2025 7.1 A Planning Justification Report was submitted by the Biglieri Group and an Addendum Letter was later submitted to address various comments. The report indicated that the applications represent an appropriate form of development, consistent with the upper- level Provincial policies, the Clarington Official Plan, the Southwest Courtice Secondary Plan and represents good planning. Urban Design Brief, prepared by Biglieri Group, April 2023 7.2 The Urban Design Brief states that the proposed development maintains the character of the surrounding context and prioritizes pedestrian safety and a sense of place through the proposed road network and pedestrian connections which have been designed to connect with the surrounding existing and future planned network. The proposal shows various lot sizes, similar to the lots within the first phase and the lots in the draft plan of subdivision to the south. The report states that the proposal is an appropriate development that represents good planning. Environmental Impact Study, prepared by GeoProcess Research Associates, May 8, 2023, revised June 6, 2024 7.3 An updated Environmental Impact Study (EIS) has been prepared by GeoProcess and includes the original EIS prepared by Savanta (revised August 2019) as an appendix. The report was prepared to determine if the development limits are appropriate in consideration of the natural heritage features identified on the lands adjacent to the site. A constraints map was provided and the updated report indicated that the open space lands dedicated to the Municipality as part of Phase One remain appropriate. The extension of Roswell Drive represents the development limits on the west side of the site. 7.4 There is also a treed area within the subject site that was assessed and determined to be less than the minimum size requirement to be considered a significant woodland to be protected. The EIS further supports that the treed area does not provide a significant ecological function and was not included in the forest cover calculation of the subwatershed study. The addendum letter recommends that reforestation should be considered to areas identified as natural heritage system as compensation for the removal of the low quality woodland. Page 226 Municipality of Clarington Page 11 Report PDS-017-26 Sustainability Report, prepared by Biglieri Group, May 8, 2023, revised June 27, 2024 7.5 The Sustainability Report demonstrates how the development will ensure energy efficiency, protection of air and water quality, the management of solid waste, protection of the natural environment, and education of residents of these sustainable principles. It includes an analysis of the proposed development in relation to the Clarington Priority Green Development Framework checklist for Draft Plans of Subdivisions. Some key components are:  Minimize road lengths to facilitate better pedestrian connectivity;  Provide a mix of dwelling units;  Provide rough-ins for future installation of EV charging stations;  Planting an additional 98 trees; and  Visual connections to the natural heritage area along Roswell Drive. Noise Impact Study, prepared by YCA Engineering Ltd., April 2023, revised Feb. 2024 7.6 The subject site is located adjacent to Prestonvale Road, which is designated as a Type ‘C’ Arterial Road in the Clarington Official Plan and is a source of transportation noise. This study was prepared to assess the impacts of noise generated from the road and determine mitigation measures to reduce the noise impacts and the appropriate noise clauses to be added to the offer of purchase and sa le agreements for future home buyers. The recommendations of the report indicate that noise levels in the outdoor amenity areas for the units which face Prestonvale Road exceed the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks criteria without any mi tigation measures. It recommends a 1.8 m acoustic fence be installed along the exterior side yards to bring the noise levels at an acceptable level to meet the Ministry requirements, in addition to the recommended warning clauses. Hydrological Assessment and Geotechnical Investigation Addendum, prepared by GHD, May 14, 2024 7.7 Field investigations and test holes for both phases were conducted; however, the original report only identified the Phase 1 lands as being subject to the geotechnical development recommendations and the hydrogeological component did not include a water balance for the Phase 2 lands. As a result, an addendum letter was prepared to address the gaps between the Report and information required for the development application of the Phase 2 component of the subdivision. 7.8 The addendum letter recommends basement floors should be placed at least 1 m above the depth where this condition is noted or be provided with under slab drainage, as recommended in the report where such conditions are noted during basement excavations. Page 227 Municipality of Clarington Page 12 Report PDS-017-26 7.9 The Hydrogeological Assessment concludes that, based on the information collected during the investigation, development at the site is feasible from a hydr ological perspective as the water can be handled with appropriate engineering techniques. The addendum report indicates that there is evidence of artesian zones which are to be avoided. It is expected that these permanent groundwater zones will be below th e depth of the future development. Through the development process, consideration of groundwater conditions and implementation of various management plans and monitoring will ensure compliance with local and provincial regulations. Appropriate LID and sediment and erosion control measures can be implemented to mitigate impacts. Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, Candevcon East Ltd., April 2023, revised August 2025 7.10 The Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management report identifies how the site would be serviced and how the stormwater will be managed post development. The subject lands rely on connections to the future sanitary and watermain proposed in the development to the south on Rosswell Drive (Tribute Community). 7.11 The report indicates that the site will be drained to the proposed future stormwater management facility to the south within the Tribute Communities development. The future stormwater management facility will provide sufficient quantity, quality and erosion control for the proposed development. Arborist Report Amendment Memo, prepared by GeoProcess Research Associates, Sept. 13, 2022, revised Aug. 22, 2025 7.12 The original arborist report was submitted in September 2022 and was revised in August 2025. An addendum letter was later submitted to respond to Municipal comments related to retention of trees along the perimeter of the site and to preserve one tree within the minimum vegetation protection area of the woodlot. The report recommends removal of all identified trees within Phase Two, which totals 54 Trees. The trees around the perimeter need to be removed to support the proposed grading plan and road widening. The arborist recommends that the tree within the minimum vegetation protection area should be removed because the health of the tree is in decline and it could pose a safety hazard given its close proximity to the future extension of Roswell Drive. Archeological Assessment – Stage 1-2, prepared by Archaeological Assessments Ltd., Oct. 12, 2017 7.13 A Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment was prepared for the site. The assessment concluded that the subject property would not require any further archeological investigation as the site did not contain any cultural heritage value or interest and the report has been accepted by the Ministry. Page 228 Municipality of Clarington Page 13 Report PDS-017-26 Phase One and Two Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by GHD, dated Aug. 22, 2019, updated April 22, 2024 7.14 The Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was submitted to determine if there were any potential contaminants located on the subject lands which are proposed to be redeveloped for residential uses. 7.15 A Phase Two ESA from 2015 was submitted for the first phase of this development. Updates to the Phase One/Two ESAs were completed in 2019 and were accepted by the Region as part of the Registration of the first phase. The April 2024 Phase One Update Letter prepared by GHD as part of the second phase of the subdivision provides an investigation of the land uses on the subject site since the preparation of the original Phase Two ESA and concludes nothing has changed on the site since 2015 and that no further work is required beyond completing an update letter within 18 months of registration of the subdivision as a condition of draft plan approval. 7.16 To rely on the environmental work performed, Staff will also require the completion of a Reliance Letter and Certificate of Insurance forms. These conditions would also need to be completed before removal of the Hold symbol in the Zoning. 8. Public Notice and Submissions 8.1 Given the postal strike at the time of the public meeting, Public Notice was hand delivered to approximately 65 residents within 120 metres of the subject lands, and 13 notices were sent out by courier to the landowners who resided outside of subject area. Two signs were installed on the subject lands fronting Prestonvale Road and Rosswell Drive. 8.2 Details of the proposed application were also posted on a dedicated webpage (www.clarington.net/PrestonvaleCourtice) and in the Clarington Connected e- newsletter. 8.3 The Public Meeting was held on December 9, 2024 and Staff received four submissions from the public regarding active transportation connections, preservation of trees on the property, mitigation measures during construction to reduce nuisances, and increase in traffic. These comments and concerns are addressed in Section 10 of this report. 9. Department and Agency Comments 9.1 Various agencies and internal departments were circulated for comments on the applications. Attachment 3 to this report is a chart that provides the list of circulated parties. Page 229 Municipality of Clarington Page 14 Report PDS-017-26 10. Discussion 10.1 The site is located within the Courtice Urban Area and is considered Greenfield development. It is located along Prestonvale Road, which is a Type C Arterial Road. Environmental features are adjacent to the property, on the west side and an Environmental Impact Study was prepared to address any potential impacts from the development. The applicant has proposed a total of 53 units consisting of 41 singles and 12 street related townhouses, as well as a part lot proposed to be melded with a lot in Phase One. The proposal is the second phase, of what is referred to as, the Millwood Trails subdivision. Pedestrian Connections and Park 10.2 Prestonvale Road is currently in the Municipality’s Development Charges Study to be urbanized as development moves forward. The applicant will be responsible for completing Prestonvale Road upgrades along the frontage of the site from the Jack Potts Way to the limit of the south property line. This includes the construction of a 3.0 - metre-wide multi-use path. The proposed development also incorporates sidewalks along Rosswell Drive and east-west connections to the multi-use trail. 10.3 The plan currently shows a sidewalk internal to Street A, however, Durham Region Transit has requested that the sidewalk be shown on the outer side of Street A to avoid street crossings in order to access the multi-use path on Prestonvale Road. The applicant has indicated that this was not feasible due to the grades of the site. These details will be further reviewed at the detailed design stage of the subdivision application. 10.4 No parks are proposed within this development given the close proximity to Rosswell Park and the South Courtice Recreation Complex. Payment in lieu of parkland will be required for this proposal and will be addressed through the conditions of draft plan approval of the subdivision. Reduced Lot Frontages in Relation to On-street Parking 10.5 The draft plan provided by the applicant shows four of the single detached units will have 9.1 metre frontages, and the 12 townhouse units are proposed to have 6 metre frontages. A Council resolution from 1999 (resolution#GPA-472-99) supports the recommendations in a Staff report (PD-36-99) to address parking and subdivision design to minimize on street parking issues. The recommendation gave direction that townhouses which front on a public road shall have a minimum frontage of 7 metres, as opposed to 6 metres. The minimum frontage established was an attempt to address concerns regarding not enough adequate on-street parking and increase landscaped open space in the front yards. In the past, Clarington has also consistently required singles to have a minimum frontage of 10 metres, however more recent approvals have deviated from this requirement. Page 230 Municipality of Clarington Page 15 Report PDS-017-26 10.6 The applicant has worked with Municipal Staff and revised the draft plan which now shows up to 70% of the lots to meet Clarington’s standard minimum lot frontage requirements. This was increased from the previous design which showed only 65% of the lots meeting this standard. The previous draft plan showed 27 single detached lots which had less than 10 metres of frontage. The revised draft plan now shows only four. This will allow for increased landscaping in the front yard, increased snow storage area, and less conflicts related to on-street parking. 10.7 The draft plan was also revised to decrease the amount townhouse units from 18 to 12 and increased the number of single detached lots that have frontages of 11.3 metres, which will provide more parking on the lot and support less conflicts with driveway locations and on-street parking. Also, a portion of Street A, which is a Cresent, will not have driveway entrances on the sides of the flanking lots. This will provide a greater amount of on-street parking. Staff are satisfied with the revisions made to the draft plan and support the improvements made to address the parking issues. Soft Landscaping in the Front Yard 10.8 In June of 2024, Municipal Staff initiated a Zoning By-law Amendment to address the amount of soft landscaping required in the front yard. This work was completed in response to the number of complaints received from residents regarding the hard landscaping in the front yard, typically done to allow for more parking on the driveway. 10.9 Prior to the By-law Amendment which introduced the soft landscaping requirement, the minimum requirement for landscape open space was 30% and it applied to the entire lot. The definition of landscape open space can include hard surface areas. By introducing the soft landscaping in the front yard to a minimum of 40%, it makes it difficult to achieve two outdoor parking spaces, walkways, etc, especially on lots with smaller lot frontages. 10.10 Through further discussions with the applicant, Staff are supportive of the reduction to the soft landscaping in order to balance the need of providing two outdoor parking spaces on the lot for the single detached units. At the time this By-law Amendment was passed, the applicant had already completed their first submission of the Stage 2 pre - consultation review and was targeting a landscape open space of 30%. 10.11 There have been many discussions with the Owner, Applicant, and Staff to try to meet the minimum 40% soft landscape open space now within the Clarington 84-63 By-law. The applicant has provided an analysis to demonstrate that they can come close to meeting the 40% soft landscaping in the front yard, however they would need some flexibility to account for stairs, walkways, patios, etc. 10.12 The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment for each specific exception zone introduced will maintain a soft landscape provision in the front yard in order to meet the intent of the provision when it was introduced in 2024, however the percentage of the soft landscaping will be reduced to 35%, increasing from the 30% that was allowed previously, with the main difference being that it now has to be soft landscaping. This would also only apply to the lots which have le ss than 11.3 metres of frontage. Page 231 Municipality of Clarington Page 16 Report PDS-017-26 Servicing 10.13 This proposed subdivision is dependent upon municipal sanitary and water expansion projects as well as the extension of local sanitary sewers and watermains through the proposed Tribute (Prestonvale) Limited development, south of the subject site. The following is a brief description of the infrastructure required to service the proposed development:  A Baseline Road Sanitary Sewer Pumping Station (SSPS) and Forcemain.  The design assignment for the Baseline Road SSPS, forcemain, and watermain has commenced. Construction timelines will need to be reviewed and coordinated as all work moves forward.  A secondary water supply, provided in part via a Zone 1 400mm diameter feedermain extended within the Baseline Road R.O.W. from Prestonvale Road to Trulls Road. Continuing within the Prestonvale Road S. R.O.W. from Baseline Road to be reduced for a connection to an existing 300 mm dia. watermain.  The Applicant shall coordinate with the adjacent developer Tribute (Prestonv ale) Limited development and submit a General Plan of Services that includes proposed sanitary sewers and watermains to the Roswell Drive and Prestonvale Road intersection. Environmental Protection and Tree Preservation 10.14 The Environmental Impact Study verified that no feature and/or functions associated with headwater drainage features are present on the ground and/or there is no connection downstream. It also confirms that the Phase 2 development will not impact the woodlands or wetlands west of the site, which have already been dedicated to the Municipality as part of the first phase. 10.15 There are some trees, mostly along the perimeter of the site that will need to be removed in order to match existing grades of adjacent lands and accommodate the proposed road network or road widenings. The Arborist report recommends the removal of 54 trees, five of which are dead and could be a safety hazard if they are not removed. It is recommended that live trees are compensated for at a 2 to 1 ratio. Therefore, 98 new trees are to be planted and shown as part of the landscaping plan at the detailed design stage of the subdivision. There are opportunities for trees to be planted along Prestonvale Road and within the open space areas associated with the Robinson Creek. Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment 10.16 A rezoning is required to facilitate the development and rezone the lands from “Agricultural (A)” to various Urban Residential Exception Zones. A hold symbol is proposed for the subject lands and will be removed once the Applicant fulfills the conditions of the subdivision. The conditions of the subdivision will be prepared at a later date, provided Council supports the recommendations in this report. Page 232 Municipality of Clarington Page 17 Report PDS-017-26 Vehicle Access and Traffic 10.17 Concerns were raised from the public regarding increased traffic. The amount of traffic generated by the proposed development does not warrant any further road improvements or intersection improvements to accommodate the additional 53 units. The site proposes to have vehicle access via a new proposed local road, Street A, which will connect off the extension of Roswell Drive. Roswell Drive will be extended further south, into the Tribute Prestonvale lands and then continue east to connect with Prestonvale Road. 11. Financial Considerations 11.1 The capital infrastructure required for this development will be built by the developer and assumed by the Municipality upon acceptance. The Municipality will include the new capital assets in its asset management plans and be responsible for the major repair, rehabilitation, and replacement in the future. 12. Strategic Plan 11.2 The proposed development has been reviewed against the three pillars of the Clarington Strategic Plan 2024-27. Clarington’s Strategic Plan prioritizes applications resulting in the creation of growing, resilient, sustainable, and complete communities and connecting residents through the design of safe, diverse, inclusive, and vibrant communities. The proposal aligns with Clarington’s Strategic Plan. 12 Climate Change 12.1 The applicant has prepared a Sustainability Analysis. This proposal considers climate risks by implementing sustainable design techniques, features and attributes that will include active and passive strategies reducing energy and water consumption through building materials and fixtures, protecting water quality though enhanced storm water management strategies and low-impact development (LID) measures and reducing the urban heat island effect through landscaping measures. 13. Concurrence 13.1 Not applicable. Page 233 Municipality of Clarington Page 18 Report PDS-017-26 14. Conclusion 14.1 In consideration of the review of the detailed plans, all agency, staff and public comments, it is respectfully recommended that the Zoning By-law Amendment included in Attachments 1 be approved. The (H) Holding provision will be removed once the applicant fulfills all the conditions of the subdivision. The conditions for the subdivision will be issued after Council makes a decision on the rezoning application . Staff Contact: Nicole Zambri, Principal Planner, (905) 623-3379 x 2422 or nzambri@clarington.net Attachments: Attachment 1 – Draft Zoning By-law Amendment Attachment 2 – Draft Plan of Subdivision Attachment 3 – Department and Agency Comments Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 234 Attachment 1 to Report PDS-017-26 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-law Number 2026-__ Being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington. Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA-2024-0008 Now therefore the Council of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Section 13.4 “Special Exceptions – Urban Residential Type Two (R2) Zone” is hereby amended by adding thereto, the following new Special Exception Zone 13.4.94 as follows: 13.4.94 Urban Residential Exception (R2-94) Zone Notwithstanding Sections 3.1 g. i), iv), 3.16 c. iii), 13.2 a., b., c. i), ii), iii), e., h., those lands zoned R2-94 shall be subject to the following regulations and the applicable provisions not amended by the R2-94 zone: a. Lot Area (minimum) 270 square metres b. Lot Frontage (minimum) i) Interior Lot 9.1 metres ii) Exterior Lot 12.0 metres c. Yard Requirements (minimum) i) Front Yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport; 4.0 metres to dwelling; 2.0 metres to porch ii) Exterior Side Yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport; 4.0 metres to dwelling; 2.0 metres to porch iii) Interior Side Yard 1.2 metres on one side, and 0.6 metres on the other side Page 235 d. Lot Coverage (maximum) i) Dwelling 45 percent ii) Total of all Buildings and Structures 50 percent iii) Notwithstanding the above lot coverage provision, a covered and unenclosed porch/balcony having no habitable floor space above it, shall be permitted subject to the following: a) In the case of an interior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 12.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage. b) In the case of an exterior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 20.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front and/or exterior side yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage. e. Front Yard Soft Landscaping (minimum) 35 percent f. Driveway Width (maximum) 4.6 metres g. Garage Requirements i) All garage doors shall not be located any closer to the street line than the dwellings front wall or exterior side wall or covered porch projection. ii) The outside width of the garage shall be a maximum of 40% of the width of the lot frontage. h. Height of floor deck of unenclosed porch located in the front yard (maximum) 1.0 metres above finished grade i. Special Yard Regulations i) Bay windows with foundations may project into any required yard to a distance of not more than 0.75 metres with the bay window having a maximum width of 3.0 metres, but in no instance shall the interior side yard be reduced below 0.6 metres. ii) Steps may project into the required front or exterior side yards, but in no instance shall the front or exterior side yard be reduced below 1.0 metre. iii) Visibility Triangle (minimum) 3.0 metres Page 236 2. Section 13.4 “Special Exceptions – Urban Residential Type Two (R2) Zone” is hereby amended by adding thereto, the following new Special Exception Zone 13.4.95 as follows: 13.4.95 Urban Residential Exception (R2-95) Zone Notwithstanding Sections 3.1 g. i), iv), 3.16 c. iii), 13.2 a., b., c. i), ii), iii), e., h., those lands zoned R2-95 shall be subject to the following regulations and the applicable provisions not amended by the R2 -95 zone: a. Lot Area (minimum) 300 square metres b. Lot Frontage (minimum) i) Interior Lot 11.0 metres ii) Exterior Lot 14.3 metres c. Yard Requirements (minimum) i) Front Yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport; 4.0 metres to dwelling; 2.0 metres to porch ii) Exterior Side Yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport; 4.0 metres to dwelling; 2.0 metres to porch iii) Interior Side Yard 1.2 metres on one side, and 0.6 metres on the other side d. Lot Coverage (maximum) i) Dwelling 45 percent ii) Total of all Buildings and Structures 50 percent iii) Notwithstanding the above lot coverage provision, a covered and unenclosed porch/balcony having no habitable floor space above it, shall be permitted subject to the following: Page 237 a) In the case of an interior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 12.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage. b) In the case of an exterior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 20.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front and/or exterior side yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage. e. Front Yard Soft Landscaping (minimum) 35 percent f. Driveway Width (maximum) 5.5 metres g. Garage Requirements i) All garage doors shall not be located any closer to the street line than the dwellings front wall or exterior side wall or covered porch projection. ii) The outside width of the garage shall be a maximum of 53% of the width of the lot frontage. h. Height of floor deck of unenclosed porch located in the front yard (maximum) 1.0 metres above finished grade i. Special Yard Regulations i) Bay windows with foundations may project into any required yard to a distance of not more than 0.75 metres with the bay window having a maximum width of 3.0 metres, but in no instance shall the interior side yard be reduced below 0.6 metres. ii) Steps may project into the required front or exterior side yards, but in no instance shall the front or exterior side yard be reduced below 1.0 metre. iii) Visibility Triangle (minimum) 3.0 metres Page 238 3. Section 13.4 “Special Exceptions – Urban Residential Type Two (R2) Zone” is hereby amended by adding thereto, the following new Special Exception Zone 13.4.96 as follows: 13.4.96 Urban Residential Exception (R2-96) Zone Notwithstanding Sections 3.1 g. i), iv), 3.16 c. iii), 13.2 a., b., c. i), ii), iii), e., h., those lands zoned R2-96 shall be subject to the following regulations and the applicable provisions not amended by the R2-96 zone: a. Lot Area (minimum) 360 square metres b. Lot Frontage (minimum) i) Interior Lot 12.2 metres ii) Exterior Lot 14.3 metres c. Yard Requirements (minimum) i) Front Yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport; 4.0 metres to dwelling; 2.0 metres to porch ii) Exterior Side Yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport; 4.0 metres to dwelling; 2.0 metres to porch iii) Interior Side Yard 1.2 metres on one side, and 0.6 metres on the other side d. Lot Coverage (maximum) i) Dwelling 45 percent ii) Total of all Buildings and Structures 50 percent iii) Notwithstanding the above lot coverage provision, a covered and unenclosed porch/balcony having no habitable floor space above it, shall be permitted subject to the following: Page 239 a) In the case of an interior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 12.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage. b) In the case of an exterior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 20.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front and/or exterior side yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage. e. Front Yard Soft Landscaping (minimum) 40 percent f. Garage Requirements i) All garage doors shall not be located any closer to the street line than the dwellings front wall or exterior side wall or covered porch projection. ii) The outside width of the garage shall be a maximum of 6.4 metres. g. Height of floor deck of unenclosed porch located in the front yard (maximum) 1.0 metres above finished grade h. Special Yard Regulations i) Bay windows with foundations may project into any required yard to a distance of not more than 0.75 metres with the bay window having a maximum width of 3.0 metres, but in no instance shall the interior side yard be reduced below 0.6 metres. ii) Steps may project into the required front or exterior side yards, but in no instance shall the front or exterior side yard be reduced below 1.0 metre. iii) Visibility Triangle (minimum) 4.0 metres 4. Section 14.6 “Special Exceptions – Urban Residential Type Three (R3) Zone” is hereby amended by adding thereto, the following new Special Exception Zone 14.6.84 as follows: 14.6.84 Urban Residential Exception (R3-84) Zone Notwithstanding Sections 3.1 g. i), iv), 3.16 c. iii), 14.1, 14.3 c. ii), iii), e., h., those lands zoned R3-84 shall only be used for street townhouse dwellings, subject to the following regulations and the applicable provisions not amended by the R3-84 zone: a. Yard Requirements (minimum) i) Interior Side Yard 1.2 metres, nil where a building has a common wall with a building on an adjacent lot located in an R3 zone Page 240 ii) Exterior Side Yard 3.0 metres b. Lot Coverage (maximum) i) Dwelling 52 percent ii) Total of all Buildings and Structures 55 percent iii) Notwithstanding the above lot coverage provision, a covered and unenclosed porch/balcony having no habitable floor space above it, shall be permitted subject to the following: a) In the case of an interior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 10.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage. b) In the case of an exterior lot, an unenclosed porch/balcony up to a maximum area of 15.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front and/or exterior side yard of the lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage. c. Front Yard Soft Landscaping (minimum) 35 percent d. Driveway Width (maximum) 3.0 metres e. Garage Requirements i) All garage doors shall not be located any closer to the street line than the dwellings front wall or exterior side wall or covered porch projection. f. Height of floor deck of unenclosed porch located in the front yard (maximum) 1.0 metres above finished grade g. Special Yard Regulations i) Bay windows with foundations may project into any required yard to a distance of not more than 0.75 metres with the bay window having a maximum width of 3.0 metres, but in no instance shall the interior side yard be reduced below 0.6 metres. ii) Steps may project into the required front or exterior side yards, but in no instance shall the front or exterior side yard be reduced below 1.0 metre. iii) Visibility Triangle (minimum) 3.0 metres Page 241 5. Schedule ‘4’ to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone from: “Agricultural (A) Zone” to “Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-67) Zone” “Agricultural (A) Zone” to “Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-94) Zone” “Agricultural (A) Zone” to “Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-95) Zone” “Agricultural (A) Zone” to “Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-96) Zone” “Agricultural (A) Zone” to “Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R3-84) Zone” as illustrated on the attached Schedule ‘A’ hereto. 6. Schedule ‘A’ attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 7. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 and Section 36 of the Planning Act. By-Law passed in open session this ___ day of February, 2026 __________________________ Adrian Foster, Mayor _________________________ June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk Page 242 Page 243 12.85 30 . 2 2 30 . 2 2 30 . 2 2 30 . 2 2 30 . 2 2 30 . 2 5 31 . 0 6 30 . 2 2 11.30 11.30 11.30 9.15 9.15 9.50 9.50 7.69 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 8.04 8.04 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 10.45 15.71 11.00 11.30 11.30 11.00 12.23 12.20 12.50 12.50 12.20 15.51 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 32 33 8 31 BLOCK 42 Townhouse 6 Units BLOCK 43 Townhouse 6 Units BLOCK 45 Lot Expansion 0.01 ha BLOCK 44 Road Widening 0.08 ha 7 9 30 18 19 BLOCK 47 0.3m Reserve BLOCK 48 0.3m Reserve BLOCK 49 0.3m Reserve BLOCK 50 0.3m Reserve 1716151413121110 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 BLOCK 46 0.3m Reserve RO S S W E L L D R I V E EX T E N S I O N STREET A STREET A ST R E E T A 23.00 23.00 18 . 0 0 18 . 0 0 23.00 15.00 15.00 18 . 0 0 5 x 5 5 x 5 5 x 5 5 x 5 42.6839.73 32 . 9 8 ℄r=110 ℄r= 2 0 0 5.00 RO S S W E L L D R I V E ( 2 3 m ) Block 72 Plan 40M2704 26 . 9 5 20. 5 4 25 . 2 2 Future Residenti a l Future Residen t i a l Existing Residen t i a l Existin g Enviro n m e n t a l Protec t i o n A r e a PR E S T O N V A L E R O A D ( 1 6 m ) 5 x 5 29 . 1 8 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 30 . 0 0 29 . 9 9 15.00 11.30 11.30 11.30 11.30 11.30 11.30 11.30 11.30 11.30 13.11 11.30 11.30 11.30 11.30 11.30 11.30 11.30 11.30 13.1211.3011.30 22.49 PR E S T O N V A L E R O A D HIGH W A Y 4 0 1 RO S E W ELL D R BLOOR ST LOOR ST TO W N L I N E R D S N.T.S . I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE BIGLIERI GROUP LTD. TO PREPARE AND SUBMIT THIS DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO THE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LANDS TO BE SUBDIVIDED AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE ADJACENT LANDS ARE ACCURATE AND CORRECTLY SHOWN AS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 51(17) OF THE PLANNING ACT R.S.O. 1990. No.Description Date Int. SCALE: DATE: PROJECT No.: March 1, 2023 1 2 3 REVISIONS DRAWING No.: TITLE: CHECKED BY:DRAFTED BY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: KEY PLAN: REQUIRED INFORMATION: SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: OWNER'S CERTIFICATE: APPROVAL STAMP: DATE DATE 4 5 1:400 17473 DP-01 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 1430 &1500 PRESTONVALE ROAD EC DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION MP DELPARK HOMES PRESTONVALE INC. (a) SEE PLAN (b) SEE PLAN (c) SEE KEY MAP (d) SEE SCHEDULE OF LAND USE (e) SEE PLAN (f) SEE PLAN (g) SEE PLAN (h) MUNICIPAL PIPED WATER AVAILABLE AT TIME OF DEVELOPMENT (i) SEE SOILS REPORT (j) SEE PLAN (k) GARBAGE COLLECTION & FIRE PROTECTION (l) SEE PLAN NOTE: CONTOURS RELATE TO CANADIAN GEODETIC DATUM PART OF LOT 24, CONCESSION 1 (DARLINGTON) AND BLOCK 72 OF PLAN 40M2704 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM BLOCK 72 OF PLAN 40M2704 SUBJECT PROPERTY 2023/04/05 DELPARK HOMES PRESTONVALE INC. DAVID COMERY, O.L.S. IBW SURVEYORS LTD. REVISED LOT AND BLOCK WIDTHS MP 2023/04/12REVISED LOT AND BLOCK WIDTHS EC 2024/02/07REPLACED TOWNHOUSES WITH SINGLES MJ 2024/05/01UPDATED LOT FRONTAGES EC 2472 Kingston Road, Toronto 21 King Street W, Suite 1502, Hamilton (416) 693-9155 thebiglierigroup.com BIGLIERIGROUP 2024/06/17UPDATED LOTS AND BLOCKS EC Attachment 2 to Report PDS-017-26 Page 244 Attachment 3 to Report PDS-017-26 Attachment 3 – Agency and Department Comments The following agencies and internal departments were circulated for comments on the applications. Below is a chart showing the list of circulated parties and whether or not we have received comments to date. Department/Agency Comments Received Summary of Comment ☒ Region’s ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ Page 245 Department/Agency Comments Received Summary of Comment French Public Board: Conseil Scolaire Viamonde ☐ No comments. French Catholic Board: Conseil Scolaire Catholique Mon Avenir ☐ No comments. Clarington Engineering Development Division ☒ Clarington Engineering has no objection to the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment. Remaining comments can be addressed at the detail design stage of the subdivision process. Clarington Emergency and Fire Services ☒ Clarington Emergency and Fire Services has no objection to the Zoning By-law Amendment. Clarington Building Division ☒ Clarington Building has no objection to the Zoning By-law Amendment. Enbridge Gas ☒ Enbridge Gas has no objection to the Zoning By-law Amendment. Hydro One ☒ Hydro One has no objection to the Zoning By- law Amendment. Bell ☒ Bell has no objection to the Zoning By-law Amendment. Rogers Cable ☒ Rogers Cable has no objection to the Zoning By-law Amendment. Canada Post ☒ Canada Post has no objection to the Zoning By-law Amendment. Canada Post will provide mail delivery service to this development through Community Mailboxes. The location of the community mailboxes will be determined at the detailed design stage of the subdivision application. Page 246 Owner: Brookfield Residential (Ontario) Ltd. Applicant: GHD Application Details: Applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision •To create a total of 62 residential units consisting of 44 single detached dwelling units and 18 street townhouse dwellings. •Creation of a medium density regional corridor block. •A neighbourhood park, environmental protection block, local and collector roads and a road widening are also proposed. •Site area: 6.28 hectares Statutory Public Meeting COPA2024-0006 ZBA2024-0030 and S-C-2024-0016 Location: 1350 Courtice Road, Courtice Meeting Date: February 9, 2026 Page 247 Untitled M ap Write a description for your map. Legend 900 ft N➤➤N Image © 2026 A irbus Image © 2026 Airbus Image © 2026 Airbus The Power of Commitment Public Meeting Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications 1350 Courtice Road, Courtice, Municipality of Clarington File no: COPA2024-0006, ZBA2024-0030 and S-C-2024-0016 February 9, 2026 Brookfield Residential Page 248 Public Meeting I 1350 Courtice Road, Courtice - Municipality of Clarington I February 9, 2026 01 Site Context Untitled Map Write a description for your map. Legend 900 ft N➤➤N Image © 2026 Airbus Image © 2026 Airbus Image © 2026 Airbus SUBJECT LANDS Co u r t i c e R o a d Tr u l l s R o a d Bloor Street Courtice Flea Market Place of Worship Woodlot Agricultural lands Preschool Agricultural lands Page 249 Public Meeting I 1350 Courtice Road, Courtice - Municipality of Clarington I February 9, 2026 02 Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan - Schedule A Schedule A – Land Use - Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan - 4 4 4 Meadowglade Road Bloor Street Gr a n v i l l e D r i v e Tr u l l s R o a d Fa r m i n g t o n D r i v e Sandringham Drive Ha n c o c k R o a d Co u r t i c e R o a d Highway 2 Watercourse Environmental Constraint Environmental Protection Area 4 Parkette Medium Density Regional Corridor Legend NP NP NP NP NP NP NP P P NP P P P Environmental Study Area** Adopted Schedule A – Land Use - Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan - 4 4 4 Mead o w g l a d e R o a d Bloor Street Gr a n v i l l e D r i v e Tr u l l s R o a d Fa r m i n g t o n D r i v e Sandringham Drive Ha n c o c k R o a d Co u r t i c e R o a d Highway 2 Watercourse Environmental Constraint Environmental Protection Area Stormwater Management Facility (SWF)* Elementary School4 Parkette Neighbourhood Park Low Density Residential Medium Density Regional Corridor High Density/Mixed Use SECSP Boundary Legend NP NP NP NP NP NP NP P P NP P P P NP P Environmental Study Area** Note: *Final SWF locations to be determined by Robinson Tooley Subwatershed Study / Landowners **Area subject to further environmental studyProminent Intersection Adopted Schedule A – Land Use - Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan - 4 4 4 Mead o w g l a d e R o a d Bloor Street Gr a n v i l l e D r i v e Tr u l l s R o a d Fa r m i n g t o n D r i v e Sandringham Drive Ha n c o c k R o a d Co u r t i c e R o a d Highway 2 Watercourse Environmental Constraint Environmental Protection Area Stormwater Management Facility (SWF)* Elementary School4 Parkette Neighbourhood Park Low Density Residential Medium Density Regional Corridor High Density/Mixed Use SECSP Boundary Legend NP NP NP NP NP NP NP P P NP P P P NP P Environmental Study Area** Note: *Final SWF locations to be determined by Robinson Tooley Subwatershed Study / Landowners **Area subject to further environmental studyProminent Intersection AdoptedSUBJECT LANDS Bloor Street Tru l l s R o a d Page 250 Public Meeting I 1350 Courtice Road, Courtice - Municipality of Clarington I February 9, 2026 03 Draft Plan of Subdivision 18.0 18 . 0 28.5 28.5 11 . 2 15 . 0 2.11 127.3 40 . 0 80.0 11 0 . 7 102.0 PARK BLOCK 50 (1.42 ha - 3.51 ac) STREET 'C' CO U R T I C E R O A D STREET 'A' MEDIUM DENSITY REGIONAL CORRIDOR BLOCK 49 (1.16 ha - 2.86 ac) 3.101 0.03 30.3 'D' TEERTS 'D' TEERTS 27 . 1 28 . 9 BLOCK 45 4 T.H. BLOCK 47 4 T.H. BLOCK 46 5 T.H. BLOCK 48 5 T.H. 'B' TEERTS FUTURE SCHOOL 133.4 23.0 18.0 18.0 PARK BLOCK 46 0.5 ha - 1.23 ac ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AREA BLOCK 42 4.53 ha - XX ac ROAD WIDENING BLOCK 53 xx ha - xx ac POTENTIAL SECONDARY SCHOOL BLOCK 49 5.16 ha - XX ac 23.7 19.3 17.3 1.51 497.7 4.721 'C' TEERTS 29.529.5 29.1 28 . 8 29 . 4 29 . 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 30 . 0 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 0.3 m RESERVE BLOCK 53 0.3m RESERVE BLOCK 54 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BLOCK 51 (0.22 ha - 0.53 ac) 0.3m RESERVE BLOCK 55 ROAD WIDENING BLOCK 52 (0.08 ha - 0.2 ac) E ytomail@ghd.com W www.ghd.com KEY PLAN-Not to Scale PROPOSEDDRAFT PLAN ScaleDate Drafting Check Design Check Project Manager Project No. DesignerAuthor ARCH DSize Status Code IssueNo.DateCheckedApproved Client SCALE 1:1000 AT ORIGINAL SIZE 20100 40 50m30 Project BROOKFIELDRESIDENTIAL SOUTH EAST COURTICE AS SHOWN P.R.P.R. S.W. OCT 2025 12610596 NOV 2024S.W.P.R.1ST SUBMISSIONA OCT 2025S.W.S.W.P.R.2ND SUBMISSIONB A PART OF LOTS 29 & 30 CONCESSION 1 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON OF SUBDIVISION OF NOW IN THE GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON SCHEDULE OF LAND USES: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOT/BLOCK UNITS AREA (ha) +9.15m DETACHED DWELLINGS 1-44 44 1.33 6.0m STREET TOWNHOUSES 45-48 18 0.38 TOTAL BLOCK/UNITS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 48 62 1.71 TOTAL AREA LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1.71 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BLOCK AREA (ha) MEDIUM DENSITY REGIONAL CORRIDOR 49 1.16 LAND USE BLOCKS BLOCK AREA (ha) PARK 50 1.42 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 51 0.20 ROAD WIDENING 52 0.08 0.3m RESERVES 53-55 0.02 TOTAL AREA LAND USE BLOCKS 1.72 ROADS LENGTH AREA (ha) 11.5 m R.O.W. (11.5m on other side of site boundary)478 0.55 15.0 m R.O.W.77 0.14 18.0 m R.O.W.425 0.71 23.0 m R.O.W.126 0.29 TOTAL ROAD LENGTH/AREA 1106 1.69 TOTAL AREA OF SUBMISSION 6.28 ha LEGEND: Deatched Dwellings Street Townhouses Medium Density Regional Corridor Park Environmental Protection Road Widening Page 251 Public Meeting Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: February 9, 2025 Report Number: PDS-016-26 Authored By: Tyler Robichaud, Senior Planner Submitted By: Darryl Lyons, Deputy CAO, Planning and Infrastructure Services Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO File Number: COPA2024-0006, ZBA2024-0030, S-C-2024-0016 Resolution#: Report Subject: Applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision to facilitate the development of 62 residential units at 1350 Courtice Road in Courtice. Purpose of Report: The purpose of this report is to provide information to the public and Council. It does not constitute, imply or request any degree of approval. Recommendations: 1. That Report PDS-016-26 and any related communication items, be received for information only; 2. That Staff receive and consider comments from the public and Council with respect to the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications submitted by GHD and continue processing the applications including the preparation of a subsequent recommendation report; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-016-26 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Page 252 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report PDS-016-26 Report Overview The Municipality is seeking the public’s input on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, 1. Application Details Owner: Brookfield Residential (Ontario) Limited Applicant: GHD Proposal: Official Plan Amendment To amend the Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan (SCSP) and the Clarington Official Plan (COP) by increasing the number of townhouse units on a block from 50 to 88 units; reference OP Policy 9.4.5 h), reducing the minimum percentage of the total number of single detached dwellings in a low density residential designation from 80% to 71% and increasing the maximum percentage of townhouse units from 20% to 29%; reference SCSP Policy 4.5.3 and reducing the minimum Neighbourhood Park size from 1.5 hectares to 1.42 hectares; reference OP policy 18.3.7 and SCSP Policy 7.2.5 a). Zoning By-law Amendment To rezone the subject lands from “Agricultural (A) Zone” to an Urban Residential Exception (R3-XX) Zone with a Holding provision to facilitate the development of single detached and street townhouse dwelling units. Part of the proposed draft plan proposes to rezone Block 51 to Environmental Protection (EP) to protect the natural heritage features and reflect the open space lands. Delegated: Draft Plan of Subdivision Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision to facilitate the development of 44 single detached dwelling lots, 18 street townhouse dwelling units, one open space block, a 1.42-hectare neighbourhood park and a Medium Density Regional Corridor block. The plan also shows proposed local and collector roads and a road widening along Courtice Road. Area: 6.28 hectares Page 253 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report PDS-016-26 Location: 1350 Courtice Road, Courtice Part of Lots 29 & 30, Concession 1; Within the Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan Area Roll Number: 1817-010-050-05800 2. Background 2.1 On December 2, 2024, GHD submitted a Clarington Official Plan Amendment, Zoning by- law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision for the subject lands along the west side of Courtice Road and south of Bloor Street (see Figure 1 and Attachment 1). A pre- consultation meeting was held on June 15, 2023, where preliminary comments from external agencies and internal departments were received. 2.2 The applications were deemed complete on January 23, 2025, and circulated to external agencies and internal departments for comments. Because the proponent’s initial submission was not consistent with several SCSP policies, concerns regarding access and availability of infrastructure, Staff recommended deferring a public meeting to coincide with the second submission. 2.3 On November 10, 2025, GHD submitted the second submission. The second submission incorporated revisions to address Staff’s comments on the initial proposal and is currently under review by Staff, applicable agencies and departments. 2.4 A list of supporting materials is available on the project webpage: www.clarington.net/1350CourticeRd Page 254 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PDS-016-26 Figure 1 – Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision 3. Land Characteristics and Surrounding Uses 3.1 The subject lands are located on the west side of Courtice Road and south of Bloor Street within the Courtice Urban Area. The lands are currently vacant and are situated within the SCSP area. The southern portion of the property, which borders the SCSP, is located within the Council-adopted Courtice Transit-Oriented Community Secondary Plan Area. The site exhibits a topographic high point along its western boundary, with grades that generally slope downward toward the southeast, in the direction of Courtice Road. The property has frontage on Regional Road 34 (Courtice Road), which is identified as a Type ‘A’ Arterial Road and Regional Corridor in the Clarington Official Plan. Page 255 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report PDS-016-26 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North: Directly north of the subject property is an existing agricultural operation, along with multiple places of worship and a small number of rural residential dwellings fronting onto Bloor Street. East: East of the property on the east side of Courtice Road, are vacant agricultural lands within the ‘Whitebelt’, consisting of cultivated farmland and areas within Clarington’s Natural Heritage System adjacent to Tooley Creek and its tributaries. South: The portion of the property south of the proposed development is within the Courtice Transit-Oriented Community Secondary Plan Area and is comprised of vacant agricultural lands with pockets of natural heritage features, and an existing rural residential dwelling. West: Directly abutting to the west are undeveloped agricultural lands planned for redevelopment in accordance with the SCSP. Further to the west are lands within the SCSP area currently being developed to accommodate a low- density residential plan of subdivision fronting onto Trulls Road. 4. Provincial Policy Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) 2024 4.1 The Provincial Planning Statement 2024 (PPS) provides policy direction on land use planning and development for matters of provincial interest. This includes protecting Provincial resources, public health and safety, and the quality of the natural and built environment. These objectives are to be achieved through efficient land use planning. Municipal official plans and secondary plans, through their land use designations and policies, serve as the primary tools for implementing the PPS. 4.2 The Provincial Planning Statement focuses growth and development within urban and rural settlement areas. Development within these areas must meet the full range of current and future needs of its population by employing efficient development patterns and avoiding significant or sensitive resources and areas that may pose a risk to public health and safety. Land use patterns should promote a mix of housing, including affordable housing, employment, recreation, parks and open spaces, and transportation choices that increase the use of active transportation and transit before other modes of travel. 4.3 The proposal is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement. Page 256 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report PDS-016-26 5. Official Plans Durham Region Official Plan (Envision Durham) 5.1 The Durham Region Official Plan (Envision Durham) designates the subject lands as “Community Areas”. The eastern portion of the development, adjacent to Courtice Road is designated as “Regional Corridor”. 5.2 Community Areas are to be planned for a variety of housing types, sizes, and tenures, including single detached and townhouse dwellings. These areas can also include population-serving uses and shall be developed in a compact form through higher densities and by intensifying and redeveloping existing areas. Development within this area shall be planned to achieve a minimum density target of 53 people and jobs per hectare. The applicant has indicated the proposal yields a net density of 36.3 units per hectare, conforming to the policies of the Low-Density Residential designation. 5.3 It is the policy of Council to recognize Regional Corridors generally as appropriate locations for higher density and mixed-use development. Encouraging built form along Regional Corridors to be multi-storey, compact, pedestrian-friendly and transit supportive, and apply the relevant transit-oriented development design principles, in accordance with Policy 8.1.4. 5.4 The proposal conforms with the Regional Official Plan (Envision Durham). Clarington Official Plan 5.5 The Clarington Official Plan designates the subject lands “Urban Residential” and “Regional Corridor”. Per Map B, the subject lands are within a Greenfield Area and per Map C, the subject lands are within the completed SCSP. Permitted uses within the Urban Residential designation include townhouses and single detached dwellings. The minimum density target within the Urban Residential designation internal to a neighbourhood is 13 units per hectare and 19 units per hectare along the edge of neighbourhoods; bu ilt form shall be between 1-3 stories. Courtice Road is a Regional Corridor and the net density within this area adjacent to the right of way is 85 units per net hectare; buildings can range from 3-12 stories. 5.6 Within the Regional Corridor designation, permitted uses include apartments and mixed- use buildings. Minimum height is 3 storeys to a maximum of 12 storeys. Townhouses are not specifically listed within the Regional Corridor in the Clarington Official Plan, however low rise-built forms are permitted between 3-4 storeys and the direction for this area has been implemented through the approved Secondary Plan. Multi-unit residential development is subject to Section 9.4.5 of the Clarington Official Plan. Policy 9.4.5 h) requires townhouses sited on blocks to not exceed 50 units; the proponent is seeking an Official Plan amendment to increase the maximum number of townhouses units within the Medium Density Regional Corridor block from 50 to 88 units. Page 257 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report PDS-016-26 5.7 Neighbourhood Parks are to serve the basic active and low intensity recreational needs of the surrounding residents. Neighbourhood Parks shall be of a size between 1.5 to 3 hectares depending on the area served and the activities to be provided. The proposal includes a 1.42-hectare Neighbourhood Park which does not conform with the parent Plan and Secondary Plan’s minimum policy requirement. 5.8 The proposal does not conform with the Clarington Official Plan. Staff are continuing to process the development application and working with the applicants to address the above noted policies. The following general criteria shall apply to the review of all Official Plan Amendment applications: a) Conformity to the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan, the Durham Regional Official Plan, and Provincial policies and plans. b) Suitability of the location for the proposed use; c) Compatibility with existing and planned land uses in the surrounding area; d) The impact on the natural environment; e) Need for the proposed use; f) Availability of supporting capital works and services; g) Fiscal impact on Municipal capital works and services; h) Comments of public agencies; i) Any other specific requirements of the Municipality; and j) Contribution or enhancement toward healthy neighbourhood design. Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan (SCSP) 5.9 The subject lands are within the SCSP. Within the Secondary Plan, the subject lands are designated “Medium Density Regional Corridor” and “Low Density Residential” as shown on Schedule A of the Secondary Plan. The SCSP designates the western portion of the lands as “Neighbourhood Park”. The locations of Neighbourhood Parks are shown on Schedule A. The precise size and location of Neighbourhood Parks are determined through the development review process and based on the park policies within Section 18 of the Clarington Official Plan. 5.10 The intersection of Bloor Street and Courtice Road is identified as a “Prominent Intersection”. Bloor Street and Courtice Road are to have dedicated bicycle lanes. An east- west collector road is also proposed along the northern boundary of the site. This collector road is to extend further west and intersect with Trulls Road. Within the Medium Density Regional Corridor designation, buildings and townhouses less than 4 storeys in height are not permitted within 50 metres of the intersection of Courtice Road and the future East - West Collector located south of Bloor Street. Page 258 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report PDS-016-26 5.11 The “Medium Density Regional Corridor” designation permits a mix of housing types in mid- rise building forms. Retail and service uses shall be provided to achieve a variety of land uses within walking distance to the residential areas. Permitted uses include apartment buildings, townhouses, and dwelling units within mixed use buildings. Retail and service uses are only permitted on the ground floor of a mixed -use building and entrances oriented to the arterial road. 5.12 The parent Official Plan Urban Residential (low density) targets are consistent with the density targets pertaining to the SCSP. However, the Secondary Plan varies slightly from the parent Official Plan policy relating to the Medium Density Regional Corridor designation. The Secondary Plan permits a minimum density target of 60 un its per net hectare (for an individual development application) yet maintains the vision to achieve an overall average density of 85 units per hectare within this designation. Additionally, the Secondary Plan permits a maximum height of 6 stories within the Medium Density Regional Corridor. In this instance, there is an inconsistency with the parent Plan, therefore the Secondary Plan will prevail. 5.13 Low Density Residential shall have a minimum net density of 13 units per hectare. The maximum height shall not exceed 3 storeys and single-detached, semi-detached and townhouse units are permitted. Detached and semi-detached dwelling units shall account for 80 percent of the total number of units in the low-density residential designation. The applicant has submitted an Official Plan Amendment to deviate from the SCSP policy 4.5.3 to permit a reduction in the minimum percentage of single detached dwellings from 80% to 71% and to increase the maximum percentage of townhouses from 20% to 29%. 5.14 Neighbourhood Parks are to be between 1.5 and 3 hectares in size that provide a variety of amenities, including sports fields. They are to be located in central locations to allow for good accessibility by walking. The proposal includes a 1.42-hectare park that does not conform to the minimum requirements in the Secondary Plan for a Neighbourhood Park. 5.15 The proposal does not conform to the Secondary Plan. Staff are continuing to process the development application and working with the applicants to address the above noted policy in accordance with the general criteria which applies to the review of all Official Plan Amendment applications, the general criteria can be referenced above in Section 5.8 of this report. 6. Zoning By-law 84-63 6.1 The subject lands are zoned “Agricultural (A) Zone” within Zoning By-law 84-63. A Zoning By-law Amendment is required to permit the proposed development which consists of single detached dwellings and street townhouses. The zoning by-law amendment under review is applicable to all blocks in the proposed draft plan with the exception of the medium-density regional corridor block. Page 259 Municipality of Clarington Page 9 Report PDS-016-26 6.2 The proposed zoning amendment would re-zone the low-density residential area from the Agricultural (A) Zone to an Urban Residential Type Three Exception (R3-XX) Zone with a holding provision. Lands identified as open space, along with their associated buffers, would be rezoned to Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. Additionally, the Neighbourhood Park would be rezoned to Urban Residential Type One (R1) Zone. The applicant’s draft Zoning By-law and corresponding schedule are provided as Attachment 3 to this report. 6.3 The proposed Holding provision would remain on the lands until the necessary conditions of draft approval and development agreements are in place for the draft plan of subdivision. The development agreements will require the applicant to, among other matters:  address the recommendations of the background studies, including submissions of additional information, plans and reports; and  provide for municipal services and road works that will service the development. 6.4 The Medium Density Regional Corridor block will remain zoned Agricultural (A) until the concept plan is updated to reflect the proposed development phasing and the applicable SCSP policies. The zoning review will align with a future Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control application, which will be submitted and processed at an appropriate stage. A subsequent report recommending the proposed zoning change for the Medium Density Regional Corridor block will be brought forward to the Planning and Development Committee at the appropriate time. 7. Summary of Background Studies 7.1 The applicant has submitted the required supporting plans and studies which have been circulated to departments and agencies for review and comment. The list of studies and drawings are on the development application webpage at www.clarington.net/1350CourticeRd and are also available upon request. A summary of the submitted reports and studies will be provided in a future recommendation report. 8. Public Notice and Submissions 8.1 Public Notice was sent to 8 landowners within 120 metres of the subject lands on January 22, 2026, informing them of the complete application and Public Meeting. Signage was also posted on the property, along Courtice Road, advising the community of the complete application received by the Municipality and details of the public meeting. Details of the proposed application and Public Meeting were also posted on the Municipality’s website, and in the Clarington Connected e-newsletter. Page 260 Municipality of Clarington Page 10 Report PDS-016-26 8.2 At the time of writing this report, staff have received one comment from a member of the public. The written comment was not objective to the proposal and was general in nature. Any additional comments received from the public, including those received during the Statutory Public Meeting, will be considered and included in a forthcoming reco mmendation report. 9. Departmental and Agency Comments 9.1 The applications were circulated to internal departments and external agencies for review and comments. A list and summary of the agency and internal department comments received, as well as all public comments received, will be included in a subsequent recommendation report. 10. Discussion 10.1 The proposed development integrates a mix of built form typologies, natural heritage protection, and supporting infrastructure within the SCSP Area. Development of the Medium Density Regional Corridor Block will be subject to future development applications. Through this process, Municipal Staff, in collaboration with internal departments and external agencies, will undertake a comprehensive review to ensure the detailed design and functionality of the site meet all applicable standards, policies, and best practices. 10.2 The proposed Neighbourhood Park on the subject lands is identified on Schedule B within the Secondary Plan. The Official Plan and Secondary Plan require Neighbourhood Parks to be a minimum of 1.5 to 3 hectares. The proposed park area is 1.42 hectares and does not meet the minimum required parkland area which will be further discussed with the proponent to address this deficiency. 10.3 The applicant has proposed temporary public access to the low-density residential area via a temporary access road from Courtice Road to Street C. This temporary access would bisect the medium density regional corridor block. The temporary right of way would remain in place as a primary access point until the future east-west collector road is constructed. Ongoing discussions with departments and agencies will continue to progress to determine the suitability of this configuration. This road network configuration would be temporary until the adjacent property to the North is developed to accommodate the north half of the east- west collector road (Street A). 10.4 The Clarington Official Plan encourages a minimum of 30% of the proposed units to be affordable. The Planning Act also requires the adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing as a matter of Provincial interest. The Secondary Plan policies encourage the development of affordable housing within the Secondary Plan boundaries. Staff will work with the applicant to encourage the inclusion of affordable housing units within the Medium Density Regional Corridor Block. Page 261 Municipality of Clarington Page 11 Report PDS-016-26 10.5 Staff are continuing discussions internally and working with the applicant to address department and agency concerns related to the proposed servicing and availability/capacity of infrastructure for the development, the proposed stormwater management plans, road design, and the lack of transit infrastructure. This includes Farmington Drive (Street B on the Draft Plan) which is subject to an ongoing Environmental Study to determine its ultimate alignment. The ultimate alignment will determine if the location of Street B is in the appropriate location to align with its extension to the north and south of the subject lands. Additionally, addressing concerns related to the availability of water and sewer infrastructure which is being coordinated with the Courtice Servicing Landowners Group of local Developers, Municipality of Clarington, and Durham Region. 11. Financial Considerations 11.1 Not Applicable, as this is a public meeting report to gather public input on the proposal. Financial considerations will be addressed in the subsequent recommendation report. 12. Strategic Plan 12.1 The proposed development will be reviewed against the three pillars of the Clarington Strategic Plan 2024-27. Staff will give special attention to the priorities of growing resilient, sustainable, and complete communities and connecting residents through the design of safe, diverse, inclusive, and vibrant communities. An analysis of the proposed development’s interaction with the specific priorities of the Strategic Plan will be included in the future recommendation report. 13. Climate Change 13.1 The application, including submitted reports are being reviewed by staff and circula ted agencies. Analysis of the proposal, including the impacts on climate change will be discussed in a subsequent recommendation report. 14. Concurrence 14.1 Not Applicable. 15. Conclusion 15.1 The purpose of this report is to provide background information and obtain comments on the submitted applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision for 62 residential units that consists of 44 single det ached dwelling units, 18 townhouse units, and a medium density block, at the Statutory Public Meeting under the Planning Act. Comments received at this public meeting will be considered and addressed in the final recommendation report. Staff will continue to review and process the applications, including consideration of department, agency and public feedback and will prepare a subsequent recommendation report for Council’s consideration on the Official Plan Amendment, and Zoning By-Law Amendment. The Draft Plan of Subdivision approval has been delegated to the Deputy CAO of Planning and Infrastructure Services. Page 262 Municipality of Clarington Page 12 Report PDS-016-26 Staff Contact: Tyler Robichaud, Senior Planner, (905) 623-3379 ext. 2420 or TRobichaud@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 – Applicant Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision Attachment 2 – Applicant Proposed Draft Official Plan Amendment Attachment 3 – Applicant Proposed Draft Zoning By-law Amendment Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 263 18.0 18 . 0 28.5 28.5 11 . 2 15 . 0 11 . 2 127.3 40 . 0 80.0 11 0 . 7 102.0 PARK BLOCK 50 (1.42 ha - 3.51 ac) STREET 'C' CO U R T I C E R O A D STREET 'A' MEDIUM DENSITY REGIONAL CORRIDOR BLOCK 49 (1.16 ha - 2.86 ac) 10 1 . 3 30 . 0 FUTURE RESIDENTIAL 30.3 ST R E E T ' D ' ST R E E T ' D ' 27 . 1 28 . 9 BLOCK 45 4 T.H. BLOCK 47 4 T.H. BLOCK 46 5 T.H. BLOCK 48 5 T.H. ST R E E T ' B ' FUTURE SCHOOL 133.4 23.0 18.0 18.0 23.7 19.3 17.3 15 . 1 497.7 12 7 . 4 ST R E E T ' C ' 29.529.5 29.1 28 . 8 29 . 4 29 . 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 30 . 0 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 0.3 m RESERVE BLOCK 53 0.3m RESERVE BLOCK 54 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BLOCK 51 (0.22 ha - 0.53 ac) 0.3m RESERVE BLOCK 55 ROAD WIDENING BLOCK 52 (0.08 ha - 0.2 ac) OTHER LAND OWNED BY APPLICANT SUBJECT SITE CO U R T I C E R O A D TR U L L S R O A D TOWNLINE ROAD EXTENTION BLOOR ST. N Plot Date:Path and Filename:G:\662\12610596\Tech\Planning\Draft Plan\12610596_DP1_BROOKFIELD_2025_10_10.dwgPlotted By: Prapti Chandreshbhai Rakhasia15 October 2025 - 2:10 PM www.ghd.com This document and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of GHD. This document may only be used by GHD’s client (and any other person who GHD has agreed can use this document) for the purpose for which it was prepared and must not be used by any other person or for any other purpose. Conditions of Use 3rd Floor - 1315 Pickering Parkway, Pickering ON - L1V 0C4 E ytomail@ghd.com W www.ghd.com KEY PLAN-Not to Scale PROPOSED DRAFT PLAN ScaleDate Drafting Check Design Check Project Manager Project No. DesignerAuthor ARCH D Size Status Code IssueNo. DateChecked Approved Client SCALE 1:1000 AT ORIGINAL SIZE 20100 40 50m30 Project BROOKFIELD RESIDENTIAL SOUTH EAST COURTICE AS SHOWN P.R.P.R. S.W. OCT 2025 12610596 NOV 2024S.W.P.R.1ST SUBMISSIONA OCT 2025S.W.S.W.P.R.2ND SUBMISSIONB A PART OF LOTS 29 & 30 CONCESSION 1 REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON OF SUBDIVISION OF NOW IN THE GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON SCHEDULE OF LAND USES: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOT/BLOCK UNITS AREA (ha) +9.15m DETACHED DWELLINGS 1-44 44 1.33 6.0m STREET TOWNHOUSES 45-48 18 0.38 TOTAL BLOCK/UNITS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 48 62 1.71 TOTAL AREA LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1.71 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BLOCK AREA (ha) MEDIUM DENSITY REGIONAL CORRIDOR 49 1.16 LAND USE BLOCKS BLOCK AREA (ha) PARK 50 1.42 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 51 0.20 ROAD WIDENING 52 0.08 0.3m RESERVES 53-55 0.02 TOTAL AREA LAND USE BLOCKS 1.72 ROADS LENGTH AREA (ha) 11.5 m R.O.W. (11.5m on other side of site boundary)478 0.55 15.0 m R.O.W. 77 0.14 18.0 m R.O.W.425 0.71 23.0 m R.O.W. 126 0.29 TOTAL ROAD LENGTH/AREA 1106 1.69 TOTAL AREA OF SUBMISSION 6.28 ha Attachment 1 to Report PDS-016-26 Page 264 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington Amendment Number XXX To the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan Purpose: To amend the Clarington Official Plan to permit a residential plan of subdivision consisting of street townhouses and a Medium Density Regional Corridor block. Location: The amendment to the Official Plan applies to property west of Courtice Road and south of Bloor Street, in Southeast Courtice. Basis: This amendment is based on applications by Brookfield Residential (Ontario) Limited Inc. to permit a residential draft plan of subdivision on lands west of Courtice Road, south of Bloor Street. Actual Amendment: The Clarington Official Plan and the Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan are hereby amended by adding an exception to Section 23.19.xx “Residential Exceptions” as follows: x.Notwithstanding policy 9.4.5 (h) more than 50 townhouse units on a single block is permitted for lands identified by Roll Number XXXXXX. Notwithstanding policy 4.5.3 of the Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan, townhouse units can account for more than 20% of the unit count in the Low Density Residential designation. Attachment 2 to Report PDS-016-26 Page 265 Implementation: The provisions set forth in the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan regarding the implementation of the Plan, shall apply in regard to this Amendment. Interpretation: The provisions set forth in the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan regarding the interpretation of the Plan, shall apply in regard to this Amendment. Page 266 Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-law Number 2025-XXXX being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By- law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA-2024-XXXX; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Section 14.6 ‘Special Exceptions – Urban Residential Type Three (R3) Zone’ is amended by adding Special Exception Zone 14.6.XX as follows: “14.6.XX Urban Residential Type Three Exception XX (R3-XX) Zone Notwithstanding Sections XXXX and XXXX, those lands zoned R3-XX on Schedule A to this By-law shall only be used for single detached dwellings and street townhouse dwellings, subject to the following zone regulations and the applicable provisions not amended by the R3-XX zone: a.Lot Area (minimum) i)Single Detached dwelling 245 square metres ii)Street townhouse dwelling 160 square metres b.Lot Frontage (minimum) Interior Lot i)Single Detached dwelling 9.0 metres ii)Street townhouse dwelling 6.0 metres c.Lot Frontage (minimum) Exterior Lot i)Single Detached dwelling 11.0 metres ii)Street townhouse dwelling 9.0 metres d.Yard Requirements (minimum) i)Rear Yard (a) Single Detached dwelling 7.5 metres (b)Street townhouse dwelling 6.0 metres ii)Interior Side Yard (a)Detached dwelling 1.2 metres on one Attachment 3 to Report PDS-016-26 Page 267 side and 0.6 metres on the other side (b) Street townhouse dwelling 1.2 metres a common wall with any dwelling on an adjacent lot ii) Exterior side Yard (a) Single Detached Dwelling 3.0 metres (b) Street Townhouse Dwelling 3.0 metres e. Lot Coverage (Maximum) (a) Single Detached dwelling 50 percent for dwelling, 55 percent for all buildings and structures (b) Street townhouse dwelling 60 percent for dwelling, 65 percent for all buildings and structures f. Landscape Open Space (Minimum) (a) Front Yard Soft Landscaping for Single Detached dwelling lots 40 per cent (b) Street townhouse dwelling 25 per cent g. Building Height (Maximum) (a) Single Detached dwelling 12 metres (b) Street townhouse dwelling 3 storey h. Parking Requirements (Minimum) (a) Single Deatched dwelling 2 parking spaces per dwelling (b) Street townhouse dwelling 2 parking spaces per dwelling (c) Step encroachment into private garage Parking Space (Maximum) 2 steps (0.6 metres) for length, 1 step (0.3 metres) for width. i. Driveway Width (Maximum) (a) Detached dwelling 3.5 metres (b) Street townhouse dwelling 3.5 metres j. A covered and enclosed/unenclosed porch/balcony/deck having no habitable space above it shall be permitted subject to the following: i) In the case of an interior lot, an enclosed/unenclosed porch/balcony/deck up to a maximum area of 12.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front yard or rear yard of a lot and shall not be calculated as lot coverage; Page 268 ii) In the case of an exterior lot, an enclosed/unenclosed porch/balcony/deck up to a maximum of 20.0 square metres shall be permitted provided it is located in the front, rear or exterior side yard and shall not be calculated as lot coverage. iii) For all lots, an uncovered deck / balcony may encroach 3.0 metres into any rear yard setback area. k. The minimum setback to a daylight triangle shall be 1.0 metres. In addition, unenclosed porches, steps, patios, ramps, landscape entrance features, attached or directly abutting the principal or main building; either above or below grade, may project into any required yard to a distance no closer than 0.5 metres to a sight triangle. l. Steps may project into the required front, year or exterior side yards, but in no instance shall the distance to the front lot line or exterior side lot line be less than 0.3 metres an in no instance shall the distance to the interior side lot line be less than 0.6 metres. 2. Schedule 4 to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from Agricultural (A) Zone to Urban Residential Type Three Exception XX (R3-XX) Zone as illustrated on the attached Schedule ‘A’ hereto. 3. Schedule ‘A’ attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 4. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act. By-Law passed in open session this _____ day of ____________, 2025. __________________________ Adrian Foster, Mayor __________________________ June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk Page 269 CO U R T I C E R O A D BLOOR STREET SUBJECT PROPERTY From: 'A' To: 'R3-XX'A From: 'A' To: 'EP' G:\662\12610596\Tech\Planning\Zoning\Zoning Schedule\12610596_ZBA SCHEDULE_BROOKFIELD_2025_11_04.dwgCad File No:4 November 2025 - 4:50 PMPlot Date:Prapti Chandreshbhai RakhasiaPlotted by: Schedule A To By-law #_________ - 25 This is Schedule A-1 to By-law #___________ passed by the Council of Municipality of Clarington this______ day of ______________,2025. _______________ _______________ Clerk Mayor Zoning change from 'A' to 'EP' Zoning change from 'A' to 'R3-XX' N Page 270