HomeMy WebLinkAboutPDS-045-25Staff Report
If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility
Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131.
Report To: Planning and Development Committee
Date of Meeting: October 20, 2025 Report Number: PDS-045-25
Authored by: Laila Shafi, Coordinator – Projects and Administration, Alicia Da Silva –
Planner I and Kaitlin Keefer, Communications Officer
Submitted By: Darryl Lyons, Deputy CAO, Planning and Infrastructure Services
Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO
By-law Number: Resolution Number:
File Number: PLN 15.17
Report Subject: Community Engagement for the Clarington Waterfront Strategy Vision and
Guiding Principles - What We Heard
Recommendation:
1.That Report PDS-045-25, and any related delegations or communication items, be
received for information.
Municipality of Clarington Page 2
Report PDS-045-25
Report Overview
As part of the renewal of Clarington’s Waterfront Strategy, this report provides Council with
background on the engagement process and a summary of community input gathered during
the second phase of public consultation.
Between June 25 and July 30, 2025, a comprehensive survey was conducted to collect
feedback on the draft Vision, Guiding Principles, and Five Distinct Experiences. The survey
was made available both online and in person, supported by a multi-channel outreach
campaign designed to ensure broad and meaningful participation. In total, 602 responses
were received, reflecting a wide range of perspectives from residents and stakeholders.
All comments received will be considered and will help inform the development of a
Waterfront Strategy that is meaningful, responsive, and reflective of the values and
aspirations of the Clarington community.
This report outlines key themes from the survey results, summarizes what was heard from
the public, and outlines next steps in the process. Additional engagement will be undertaken
once the draft Waterfront Strategy is prepared, ensuring continued opportunities for public
input prior to finalization.
1. Background
1.1 The Municipality of Clarington is renewing its Waterfront Strategy to build on the
previous successes of the 1992 Strategy, and guide planning and development along its
34 kms of Lake Ontario shoreline for the next 30 years. This report shares the results
from the public survey, which gathered input on the draft Vision, Guiding Principles and
Five Distinct Experiences. Community engagement continues to be a key part of the
process, ensuring that feedback from residents and stakeholders can help shape the
direction of the W aterfront Strategy moving forward.
1.2 The Draft Strategy will envision Clarington’s waterfront as a vibrant, inclusive
destination where nature, community, parks, and heritage come together. It is expected
to emphasize ecological resilience, connected trails, inclusive recreation, and economic
vitality. Once developed, the Strategy will be anchored by a long-term Vision, Guiding
Principles, and Five Distinct Waterfront Experiences tailored to the character and
potential of each shoreline area.
Summary of Engagement to Date
1.3 Engagement for the Waterfront Strategy began in 2022 with a series of waterfront trail
surveys, community pop-ups, Councillor interviews, and stakeholder meetings. These
early efforts helped establish a baseline understanding of community interests and
concerns, laying the groundwork for future phases.
Municipality of Clarington Page 3
Report PDS-045-25
1.4 Building on this foundation, the community engagement phase of this project was
launched in 2025 to gather feedback on the draft Vision, Guiding Principles, and Five
Distinct Experiences that will inform the draft Strategy. This phase included a public
survey, targeted outreach, and promotional efforts designed to reach a broad cross -
section of residents.
1.5 To further support transparency and collaboration, the draft Vision and Guiding
Principles were presented to the Planning and Development Committee (PDC) in May
2025 (PDS- 024-25), inviting feedback from both the public and Council. This
presentation provided an opportunity for open dialogue and ensured that the
foundational elements of the project were shaped by a broad range of perspectives.
1.6 To ensure broad and inclusive participation, the Municipality deployed a multi -channel
outreach campaign for community engagement on the Waterfront Strategy draft Vision
and Guiding Principles. The survey was made available both online and in-person at
Clarington Connected kiosks located in the Clarington municipal recreation facilities,
and the Municipal Administrative Centre. Promotional tactics included press releases, a
story in Clarington Connected newsletters mailed to every household, social media
posts, trail signage, radio advertisements, Google Ads, and direct email invitations to
interested parties and registered ActiveNet users.
1.7 Feedback was also received through Clarington’s communityservices@clarington.net
email and the project email waterfrontstrategy@clarington.net. Comments from
residents submitted via email were considered and have been reflected in the
“Additional Feedback” section of this report.
1.8 As part of Clarington’s commitment to strengthen Indigenous partnerships, First Nations
communities have been invited to learn about the project and provide feedback through
dedicated outreach to help shape the draft Strategy.
Response Rates
1.9 Between June 25 and July 30, 2025, the Waterfront Strategy webpage on Clarington
Connected received over 4,700 visits and a total of 602 surveys were completed.
1.10 To ensure the integrity and reliability of the data, respondents were required to register
through Clarington Connected before completing the survey. This measure helped track
where respondents reside, prevented duplicate submissions, and eliminated automated
responses from Artificial Intelligence (AI) bots.
1.11 To encourage broad participation and support a diverse respondent pool, participants
that completed the survey were entered into a draw for a $250 VISA gift card. This
approach is commonly used by municipalities to boost response rates and reduce bias.
2. Survey Results
2.1 The survey results reflect strong community interest and general support for the draft
Vision and Guiding Principles. Respondents emphasized the importance of
environmental protection, inclusive public access, and small scale, community-focused
amenities. The feedback provides a clear mandate to prioritize nature, accessibility, and
thoughtful, community driven planning.
Municipality of Clarington Page 4
Report PDS-045-25
2.2 This section provides a broad overview of the survey results. A more detailed summary
of results is outlined in Attachment 1.
Demographics
2.3 Survey respondents represented a broad cross-section of Clarington residents. More
than 95% of the respondents reside in Clarington, with the majority living in Bowmanville
(37%), Courtice (30%), and Newcastle (23%), while smaller percentages reside in rural
areas (4%), Orono (1%), and outside Clarington (4%).
2.4 Many respondents are long-term residents, with 30% having lived in Clarington for over
25 years (and 80% of all respondents having lived in Clarington for 5+ years). The age
range was diverse and spanned from 15 to over 85, with the largest group between 30
and 49 years old.
The Draft Vision
2.5 A Vision statement sets the long-term direction, guiding priorities and ensuring
decisions contribute to a cohesive, future-focused Strategy. Participants were asked to
rank their support of the draft Vision statement on a scale of 1 to 5.
Draft Vision: Clarington’s waterfront is a vibrant, accessible destination where
community, nature, parks, and heritage meet. Our shoreline thrives through ecological
resilience, connected trails, diverse recreation, and economic vitality. By focusing on
sustainable growth, cultural preservation, and public access, we’re creating a legacy
that enriches the lives of residents, captivates visitors and establishes a legacy of
stewardship for generations to come.
2.6 Respondents supported the draft Vision for Clarington’s W aterfront, especially its
emphasis on environmental protection and inclusive public spaces. The overall Vision
received an average rating of 3.84 out of 5. This feedback reinforced the importance of
creating a waterfront that prioritizes sustainable growth, ecological resilience, and public
access, reflecting the values of both residents and visitors.
The Guiding Principles
2.7 To support the implementation of this draft Waterfront Vision, four guiding principles
have been developed to establish a framework and set priorities for future decision -
making. They include:
Environmental Stewardship: Protect and enhance the natural environment, including
the Lake Ontario shoreline, wetlands, and wildlife habitats.
Economic Viability: Foster a vibrant and sustainable waterfront economy that supports
local businesses, attracts investment and tourism, and creates employment
opportunities.
Public Access, Connection and Enjoyment: Ensure equitable, safe and inclusive
access to the waterfront for all residents and visitors.
Municipality of Clarington Page 5
Report PDS-045-25
Design Excellence and Cultural Heritage Preservation: Create high-quality and
impactful public and private realms, while also recognizing, protecting, and celebrating
the rich cultural heritage of the waterfront
2.8 Participants were asked to rank their support of the draft Guiding Principles on a scale
of 1 to 5. Among the Guiding Principles, Environmental Stewardship was rated highest
at 4.37 out of 5, followed by Public Access, Connection and Enjoyment at 4.29, Des ign
Excellence and Cultural Heritage Preservation at 3.88, and Economic Viability at 3.73.
Overall, these principles were broadly supported, with particular emphasis on
environmental protection and inclusive design.
The Five Distinct Experiences
2.9 Five key waterfront destinations, linked by the Great Lakes Waterfront Trail, offer a
diverse mosaic of experiences that reflect the Guiding Principles and draft Vision. The
survey evaluated each waterfront area separately.
Courtice Waterfront Park:
2.10 The draft Vision: a new waterfront community featuring a prestigious 16-hectare/39-acre
Courtice Waterfront Park – bigger than the former Bowmanville Zoo lands. The park
would significantly increase public access to Lake Ontario, offer year-round recreational
opportunities, preserve the entire shoreline, and enhance the existing trail network.
2.11 The draft Vision for Courtice Waterfront Park was rated 4.03 out of 5. Residents
supported shoreline preservation and recreational access but expressed concerns
about overdevelopment and infrastructure strain.
2.12 Specific to the Courtice Waterfront Park, the survey also asked, “How much do you
support or oppose the creation of a new residential community (including shopping,
dining, and services) to help fund and acquire land for the 16-hectare/39-acre Courtice
Waterfront Park?” Although a park was highly supported, support for funding the park
through residential development was more mixed, with a rating of 3.36 out of 5.
Bowmanville Waterfront:
2.13 The draft Vision for the Bowmanville waterfront includes three key elements:
Protect and improve environmentally sensitive landscapes and natural heritage
areas, including the Bowmanville Westside Marshes Conservation Area.
Position Port Darlington West Beach Park as Clarington's main beach, with excellent
access to the water and passive/active onsite programs and amenities (i.e. beach
volleyball, boardwalks, playground).
Reimagine Port Darlington East Beach Park as an enhanced and accessible
waterfront park.
2.14 This draft Vision for this destination was supported with a rating of 3.98 out of 5.
Feedback highlighted support for environmental protection and beach enhancements,
alongside concerns about infrastructure limitations and marina conditions.
Municipality of Clarington Page 6
Report PDS-045-25
Newcastle Waterfront:
2.15 The Newcastle Waterfront's draft Vision includes a vibrant marina village with waterfront
living and enhanced public spaces:
Create a municipal-wide gateway park to the waterfront, featuring public art
installations, a boardwalk, food services, and passive/active water programs.
Position the Port of Newcastle Park on Lakebreeze Drive as a resilient shoreline
park with flexible program spaces (i.e. outdoor fitness areas).
Position Bond Head Park as a primary boat launch area.
2.16 This draft Vision for this destination was rated 3.76 out of 5. While there was support for
public amenities and a gateway park, residents strongly opposed designating Bond
Head Parkette as a primary boat launch due to size and infrastructure constraints.
Agricultural Heritage Area
2.17 The waterfront lands between Newcastle and Port Granby are envisioned(draft) as a
celebrated agricultural heritage hub with preserved food production traditions,
opportunities for agri-tourism, continued environmental stewardship and public access
to the waterfront. The draft Vision suggests new access points to the shoreline will
include enhanced and accessible waterfront trails, rest stops, lookouts, public event
spaces and passive activities to enjoy the scenic beauty of the Lake Ontario shoreline.
2.18 This destination area was rated 4.01 out of 5. Respondents supported farmland
preservation, agri-tourism, and environmental stewardship.
Port Granby Nature Reserve
2.19 Through the previously endorsed Port Granby Nature Reserve Concept Plan, there are
opportunities for continued environmental restoration, education and public access to
this natural area. Here, residents can experience the beauty of a nature reserve through
protected and preserved forests, meadows, wetlands, pastures and trails.
2.20 This destination was rated 4.14 out of 5. There was strong support for restoration,
education, and low-impact public access to the lands.
Additional Feedback
2.21 Feedback was also received through Clarington’s communityservices@clarington.net
email, as well as the project email waterfrontstrategy@clarington.net. Comments
submitted via these emails were considered and have been reflected below, along with
“final thoughts” from survey respondents.
2.22 Key themes included the need to preserve nature and heritage, ensure equitable and
inclusive public spaces, avoid privatization, engage Indigenous communities and youth,
and plan realistically for infrastructure and growth. Respondents consistently prioritized
environmental protection and community benefits.
Municipality of Clarington Page 7
Report PDS-045-25
2.23 Residents identified several missing principles, including climate resilience, Indigenous
engagement, infrastructure planning, and youth programming. There was a clear desire
for stronger environmental protections and long-term stewardship. Respondents also
emphasized the importance of meaningful engagement with Indigenous communities
and the need for inclusive, family-friendly spaces and beachfronts. The importance of
meaningful resident involvement in future planning and decision-making processes was
also identified.
2.24 Feedback received has reinforced the importance of protecting natural landscapes,
maintaining public access, and avoiding over-commercialization. Residents expressed a
strong preference for small-scale, locally owned businesses that complement public
use, and voiced concerns about traffic, infrastructure strain, and the potential loss of
community character.
2.25 Residents overwhelmingly supported shoreline preservation, year -round recreational
access, connected trail networks and walkways, and the integration of small-scale,
locally owned businesses. There was strong opposition to high-density residential
development near the waterfront and a clear preference for maintaining the natural
character of these spaces.
3. Next Steps
3.1 As outlined previously, (PDS-024-25), the feedback and insights from engagement on
the draft Vision and Guiding Principles, will inform the development of the draft
Waterfront Strategy, which is targeted for presentation to Council in December 2025.
3.2 Key themes, such as the need for clear development boundaries, infrastructure that
supports growth, and transparent planning processes, will help inform a Strategy that
reflects community values and promotes long term sustainability, equity, and
stewardship.
3.3 The Municipality of Clarington is working closely with Dillon Consulting to develop the
draft Strategy. Continued engagement is planned prior to its finalization to ensure the
Strategy remains responsive to community priorities and reflects a shared vision for the
waterfront.
4. Financial Considerations
4.1 No financial considerations.
5. Strategic Plan
5.1 This approach towards meaningful public engagement directly supports Clarington’s
Strategic Plan to Lead, Connect and Grow Responsibly. Specifically, the following
strategic priorities have been addressed:
5.2 L.4.1 – Increase opportunities for civic engagement and public participation: Through
public surveys, pop-ups, stakeholder meetings, and presentations to Council, the
engagement process has created multiple avenues for residents to contribute to the
visioning of the W aterfront Strategy.
Municipality of Clarington Page 8
Report PDS-045-25
5.3 L.4.2 – Proactively communicate with residents about the planning process and how we
are responsibly addressing growth: The engagement included outreach and education
efforts to inform residents about the Strategy and its role in shaping future growth along
the waterfront.
5.4 L.4.3 – Continue to cultivate an informed community through meaningful
communications: By incorporating feedback from various channels, including surveys,
emails, and community associations; the process has supported transparency and
constructive dialogue around municipal planning initiatives.
5.5 C.1 – A Connected Community: This engagement has fostered stronger connections
between residents, staff and council, reinforcing the community’s role in shaping public
spaces.
5.6 G.2 – Growth is proactively addressed: The Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan
provides recommendations to prioritize action items for implementation of the
Waterfront Strategy, informed by feedback from public engagement.
5.7 G.3.3 – Enhance Clarington’s Waterfront: The Waterfront Strategy is a direct initiative
under this goal, and the engagement process ensures that enhancements reflect
community values, needs, and priorities.
6. Climate Change
6.1 Sustainability and resilience are central to waterfront planning and are reflected in the
draft Vision and Guiding Principles, including Environmental Stewardship, Public
Access and Enjoyment, and Economic Viability. As the Waterfront Strategy evolves,
public feedback will continue to help shape the final Vision and Principles, aligning with
Clarington’s Corporate Climate Action Plan to support long-term environmental goals.
This approach promotes responsible growth and ensures the waterfront remains vibran t
and resilient in the face of climate change.
7. Concurrence
7.1 Not Applicable.
8. Conclusion
8.1 It is respectfully recommended that this report be received for information only.
Staff Contact: Alicia Da Silva, Planner I, adasilva@clarington.net; Kaitlin Keefer,
Communications Officer, kkeefer@clarington.net, Lisa Backus, Manager, 905-623-3379 ext.
2413, lbackus@clarington.net.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 – Clarington Waterfront Survey
Interested Parties:
List of Interested Parties available from Department.
What We Heard – Clarington Waterfront Survey
Draft Vision, Guiding Principles and Five Distinct Experiences
Survey highlights (between June 25-July 30, 2025):
602 survey respondents
4,700 webpage visitors
95% of survey respondents reside in Clarington
80% of survey respondents have lived in Clarington for 5+ years
Diverse age range of respondents, from 15 to 85+
49% of respondents between the ages of 30-50
The Vision
When asked, “how much do you agree or disagree with the draft Vision for Clarington’s waterfront?”
Overall Rating: 3.84 out of 5
14%
8%
6%
StronglyDisgree
Neutral
35%
Strongly Agree
37%
Agree
Disgree
Overall:
The community envisions Clarington’s waterfront
as a publicly accessible, ecologically resilient,
and culturally respectful space that prioritizes
nature preservation, connected trails, and inclusive
recreation. Respondents overwhelmingly support
a vision that enhances quality of life through
sustainable growth, while expressing concerns
about overdevelopment and the loss of natural
and community character.
Key Priorities:
•Environmental stewardship
and ecological resilience
•Connected trails and safe, accessible
public access
•Year-round recreation and community use
•Support for small-scale local businesses
•Concerns about overdevelopment and
high-density housing
•Requests to meaningfully integrate
Indigenous voices and local history
1Percentages are rounded to the nearest percentile; totals may not equal 100%
The Guiding Principles
When asked, “how much do you agree or disagree with the draft Guiding Principles of Environmental
Stewardship, Public Access, Connection and Enjoyment, Design Excellence and Cultural Heritage
Preservation, and Economic Viability?”
Overall:
Respondents broadly support the draft
Guiding Principles of Clarington’s waterfront
strategy, especially those emphasizing
environmental stewardship, public access,
and inclusive design. However, there is
concern that large-scale commercial
development and high-density residential
expansion could undermine the natural
character, accessibility, and long-term
sustainability of the waterfront.
1 2 3 4 5
EnvironmentalStewardship
Public Access, Connection & Enjoyment
Design Excellence & Cultural Heritage Preservation
Economic Viability
Rating: 4.37
Rating: 4.29
Rating: 3.88
Rating: 3.73
Key Priorities:
• Strong protection for wetlands, wildlife habitats and shoreline ecosystems
• Safe, accessible and barrier-free access to trails, beaches and green spaces
• Indigenous consultation, preservation of historic sites along the waterfront
• Support for small-scale, local businesses that complement public use
• Thoughtful, sustainable design that enhances natural beauty and community use
2 Attachment 1: PDS-045-25 Percentages are rounded to the nearest percentile; totals may not equal 100%
The Five Unique Experiences
When asked, “how much do you agree or disagree
with the vision for the Courtice Waterfront Park?”
Rating: 4.03 out of 5
Overall:
The Courtice Waterfront is seen as a rare and valuable
opportunity to create a landmark public space that
balances environmental preservation, recreational
access, and community well-being. While many
residents are excited about the potential for trails,
year-round activities, and shoreline protection, there
are concerns about overdevelopment, infrastructure
strain, and the loss of natural character.
26%
47%
16%
6%
4%
Strongly Agree
Disgree
Agree
Neutral
StronglyDisgree
Key Priorities:
• Preserve the shoreline, protect habitats and enhance natural features
• Naturalized landscapes, shade and minimal impacts to the environment
• Offer year-round recreational opportunities, splash pads and family-friendly activities
• Connect Courtice to the broader trail networks and waterfront destinations
• Offer safe, inclusive access via walking, biking and transit – especially across barriers
like Highway 401 and rail lines
• Concerns about high-density housing and large-scale commercial sprawl
• Support for small-scale, local businesses (i.e. cafes, ice cream shops)
3Attachment 1: PDS-045-25 Percentages are rounded to the nearest percentile; totals may not equal 100%
When asked, “how much do you support or oppose the creation of a new residential community
to help fund and acquire land for the 16-hectare/39-acre Courtice Waterfront park?”
Rating: 3.36 out of 5
Overall:
More than half of respondents support the idea in principle—recognizing the need for funding and
infrastructure—while others express strong opposition due to concerns about environmental impact,
overdevelopment, and loss of public access.
22%19%
11%
StronglySupport
SupportNeutral
18%
StronglyOppose 30%
Oppose
Key Priorities:
• Guarantee the park’s creation
• Offer nature-focused amenities
and quiet public spaces
• Opposition to high-density housing
and large-scale commercial businesses
• Ensure strong environmental safeguards,
including habitat protection, shoreline
preservation and sustainable design
• Support for small-scale local businesses
that enhance the park experience
• Phased infrastructure delivery to support
growth (i.e. schools, transit, services)
4 The following is an appendix to PDS-045-25 Percentages are rounded to the nearest percentile; totals may not equal 100%
Bowmanville Waterfront
When asked, “how much do you agree or disagree
with the vision for the Bowmanville Waterfront?”
Rating: 3.98 out of 5
Overall:
The Bowmanville waterfront vision is widely supported
for its emphasis on environmental protection, improved
public access, and recreational amenities. However,
residents raised concerns about infrastructure
limitations, environmental risks, and the need for clearer
planning and community consultation.
27%
18%
5%
StronglyAgree
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
6%
StronglyDisagree
44%
Key Priorities:
• Protect the Bowmanville Westside Marshes
Conservation Area and other sensitive areas
• Position Port Darlington West Beach as Clarington’s main beach,
and reimagine East Beach as a more accessible and inclusive space
• Suggestions for year-round programming, food vendors
and family-friendly features
• Revitalize the Bowmanville Marina as a primary boat launch
• Improve road access, parking, sidewalks, bike paths and public transit
• Preserve heritage cottages, maintain quiet natural areas
• Emphasize accessibility for seniors, children and people with disabilities
5Attachment 1: PDS-045-25 Percentages are rounded to the nearest percentile; totals may not equal 100%
Newcastle Waterfront
When asked, “how much do you agree or disagree
with the vision for the Newcastle Waterfront?”
Rating: 3.76 out of 5
Overall:
The Newcastle waterfront vision—featuring a
gateway park, resilient shoreline, and primary boat
launch—has sparked both enthusiasm and concern.
While many residents support improved public spaces
and amenities, there is strong opposition to designating
Bond Head Parkette as a primary boat launch due to
its size, infrastructure limitations, and impact on the
local community.
30%
21%
StronglyAgree
3% Disagree
Agree
Neutral
10%
StronglyDisagree
35%
Key Priorities:
• Broad support for a municipal-wide gateway park with public art,
food services and water programs
• Desire for connectivity between waterfront areas via trails and boardwalks
• Emphasis on resilient shoreline design, erosion control and habitat protection
• Opposition to Bond Head Parkette as primary boat launch
• Support for small-scale commercial development (i.e. cafes, restaurants, shops)
• Better transit, accessible washrooms, parking, senior-friendly designs
•
6 Attachment 1: PDS-045-25 Percentages are rounded to the nearest percentile; totals may not equal 100%
Agricultural Heritage
When asked, “how much do you agree or disagree
with the vision for an Agricultural Heritage Area?”
Rating: 4.01 out of 5
Overall:
The vision to celebrate Clarington’s agricultural heritage
along the waterfront is widely supported, especially
for its focus on preserving farmland, enhancing public
access, and promoting environmental stewardship.
However, residents expressed a need for clarity,
balance, and protection—ensuring that development
does not compromise the area’s rural character
or ecological integrity.
26%
24%
StronglyAgree
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
5%
43%
3% StronglyDisagree
Key Priorities:
• Protect vital farmland and maintain local food production
• Prevent urban sprawl and subdivision development on agricultural lands
• Provide educational opportunities, like farm tours, markets, and community gardens
• Offer accessible waterfront trails with lookouts and rest stops
• Provide passive recreation that respects the natural landscape
(bike paths, shade structures, washrooms)
•
7Attachment 1: PDS-045-25 Percentages are rounded to the nearest percentile; totals may not equal 100%
Port Granby Nature Reserve
When asked, “how much do you agree or disagree
with the vision for the Port Granby Nature Reserve?”
Rating: 4.14 out of 5
Overall:
The Port Granby Nature Reserve vision—focused
on environmental restoration, education, and public
access—is widely supported. Residents value the
opportunity to experience protected natural landscapes,
but many emphasize the need for minimal impact,
controlled access, and preservation of ecological
integrity.
StronglyAgree
2% Disagree
Agree
Neutral 50%
2% StronglyDisagree
20%
26%
Key Priorities:
• Preserve forests, wetlands, meadows and pastures
• Maintain the area’s wild, untouched character
• Provide low impact trails, lookouts and quiet nature experiences
• Offer environmental education, especially for youth and schools
• Consider Indigenous-led programming and features
• Ensure limited infrastructure and no commercial development
• Need for accessibility features for seniors and those with disabilities
8 Attachment 1: PDS-045-25 Percentages are rounded to the nearest percentile; totals may not equal 100%