HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-10-15Clar*mn
Clarington Accessibility Advisory Committee Minutes
Tuesday October 15, 2024 6:30 p.m.
Online Via Microsoft Teams
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at
905-623-3379 ext 2131
Present: Lesley Scherer (Chair) (until 7:40pm)
Keith Brettell
Sanja Wirch
Barbara Henn
Sheikh Hossain
Beatrice Kraayenhof
Also Present: Jeannette Whynot — Accessibility Coordinator
Katelyn Brown — Municipality of Clarington
Ken Ferguson — Municipality of Clarington
Dare Orija — Colliers Project Leaders
Shalice Coutu — MJMA
Dan Kronby — MJMA
Regrets: Councillor Corinna Traill
Hawa Mire
Allison Speight
The meeting called to order at 6:32 p.m.
1. Land Acknowledgement Statement
Lesley Scherer shared the Land Acknowledgement Statement.
2. Declarations of Interest
No declarations
3. South Bowmanville Recreation Centre (SBRC) presentation and discussion
Shalice Coutu, architect with MJMA, presented the current plans for the SBRC Phase 1
expansion, highlighting specific accessibility elements such as turning radiuses, clear space
and the locations of power door operator, among other things.
Committee members offered the following comments and recommendations.
Mobility Device Charging Station
• The AAC recommends placing a mobility device charging station near the main
entrance. Positioned in a way that users can charge their device and have a clear
view of the parking lot.
Page 11
Parking & North Entrance
• The Committee is supportive of the design and location of the accessible parking spaces.
They expressed their appreciation that four of the accessible spaces will feature EV
charging stations that can only be used by cars with accessible parking permits.
• The Committee suggested moving the bike racks further away from the accessible
parking spaces to reduce the chances of cyclists interfering with the accessible path of
travel. It was noted that cyclists can pose a danger to people with disabilities when their
spaces are not clearly defined or intertwine too closely.
• The Committee was pleased to see tactile wayfinding incorporated but noted it needed
refining before they can offer meaningful accessibility.
Outdoor Community Square
Overall, the Committee is supportive of the proposed outdoor space being developed as part
of Phase 1. Current drawings lack enough detail for the Committee to provide detailed
comments, however the following things were discussed:
Service Animal Relief Area
• It was recommended that this be located east of the south exist because there appears
to be clear space adjacent to the sprinkler room. Utilizing the sprinkler room's water
access will allow staff to wash the space, thus ensuring it is kept clean. Its proximity to
the entrance also makes this a desirable location.
Additional Rest Areas
Committee members recommended that additional rest areas/seating be provided along
the walking/skating path. Current plans do not show any seating beyond the current
gathering area, however offering rest areas throughout the area will ensure people of all
abilities are able to safely sit when they need a break.
Seating Garden
• The Committee would like to see more detailed plans when they are available.
• Any fixed seating and site furniture must consider the needs of people with disabilities,
their equipment and the people who support them.
Emergency Assistance
• Members asked if it was possible to incorporate a blue light emergency system in the
outdoor space. Blue Light beacons are found on college and university campuses have
and provide pedestrians a way to call for help in an emergency.
• The design team advised they had not considered this but would explore options.
Indoor — General Comments
A committee member suggested including a scannable QR code at the entrance that
linked to an online map giving people who are blind and low vision an opportunity to
navigate the facility independently.
The majority of power door operator locations are in excellent locations; however
Committee members noticed a few locations that could be better designed. For
example, behind the customer service counter, the power door button is poorly placed
behind a workstation and on the hinge side.
The Committee prefers the elongated power door openers over the traditional circular
design because it is more inclusive.
Page 12
• Seating should be moveable and meet the needs of larger bodies. Consider offering a
mix of seats with and without arm rests.
• Consider incorporating sensory elements into the interior decor. Tactile features on
walls were offered as a suggestion.
• Signage should be clear and well -designed. Raised characters, in addition to Braille, will
make signage accessible to blind users.
Quiet Space & Prayer Room
• The Committee noted they were really pleased to see a quite space being provided,
however they raised concerns with it being a shared space for prayer and religious
needs.
• If someone is using the quiet room to calm down and someone is using the adjacent
space for prayer, how well will that meet the needs of the users?
• The Committee recommends the two spaces be separated and accessed through
separate doors.
Indoor — Washrooms
• The Committee asked if it was possible to include one Hoyer Lift in the facility to assist
caregivers when transferring people onto the adult change room. They suggest adding a
ceiling Hoyer Lift to Universal Accessible washroom located near the change rooms.
• Washroom signage should indicate the features within it and include Braille that is
accurately states what kind of washroom it is.
The project team thanked the members of the AAC for thoughtful and insightful comments.
The AAC will be consulted again once there are additional designs to review.
4. Other Business
No other business was discussed.
5. Adjournment
Moved by Keith Brettell, seconded by Barb Henn
That the meeting be adjourned.
Carried
Meeting was adjourned at 8:02pm.
Page 13