HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-162-96DN:COA.GPA THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #�'�
Monday, 2 1996
Date: Y> Res. # � � , �-�
Report #: PD- 162 -96 File #: A96/057 & A96/061 By -law #
Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1996
FILES: A96/057 & A96/061
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD -162 -96 be received;
2. THAT Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made
on November 14, 1996; and
3. THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend
the decision of the Committee of Adjustment in the event of an appeal.
1.1 In accordance with Section 45 of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, all applications
received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled to be heard within
30 days of being received by the Secretary- Treasurer.
1.2 Applications A96/057 and A96/061 were both considered by the Committee on
November 14, 1996. Application A96/061 was APPROVED as applied for. Staff
recommended DENIAL of Application A96/057, however, the motion for approval
was 'lost" and a subsequent motion was not made. As a result of this non -
decision, staff contacted the Clerk for advice and have passed on the rules of
proceudre to the Committee for their next meeting, should they wish to reconsider
the application.
PAGE 2
1.3 Staff have reviewed the Committee's decisions and are satisfied that the decision
to approve application A96/061 is in conformity with the Official Plan policies,
consistent with the intent of the Zoning By -law, is minor in nature and desirable.
1.4 Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment decisions is required in
order to afford Staff's official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the
event of an appeal of any decision of the Committee of Adjustment.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
t
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. W.H. Stockwell
Director of Planning Chief Administrative
and Development Officer
CP *FW *df
Attachments
22 November 1996
In
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FILE NUMBER: A96/057
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
APPLICANT: D.K. GOTTWALD
AGENT: D.K. GOTTWALD
PERIODIC REPORT
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
75 MEARNS AVENUE
PART LOT: 8 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER: 40R- 16365-
ZONING: R1
HEARING DATE: 14- Nov -96
DECISION: (See below)
APPEAL DATE: 3- Dec -96
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE FROM 15 METRES (49.2 FT) TO
13.72 METRES (45.0 FT).
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
OFFICIAL PLAN & ZONING BYLAW AND IS CONSIDERED DESIRABLE & MINOR
IN NATURE THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED. "MOTION LOST ".
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A96/061
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
APPLICANT: UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA
AGENT: UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
7793 OLD SCUGOG ROAD
PART LOT: 18 CONCESSION: 7
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: RH
HEARING DATE: 14- Nov -96
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 3- Dec -96
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO INCREASE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FROM
A MAXIMUM OF 1.2 METRES (3.94 FT) TO A MAXIMUM OF 2.0 METRES (6.56
FT).
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLIC. IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
INTENT OF THE OFFICIAL PLAN & ZONING BY -LAW & IS CONSIDERED
DESIRABLE & MINOR THE APPLIC. BE APPROVED TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM
SETBACK OF 2.0 METRES FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
629