Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-11-04Clar*wn General Government Committee Post-MeetingAgenda Date: November 4, 2024 Time: 9:30 a.m. Location: Council Chambers or Electronic Participation Municipal Administrative Centre 40 Temperance Street, 2nd Floor Bowmanville, Ontario Inquiries and Accommodations: For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations for persons attending, please contact: Lindsey Turcotte, Committee Coordinator, at 905-623-3379, ext. 2106 or by email at Iurcotte@clarington.net. Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Collection, Use & Disclosure of Personal Information: If you make a delegation, or presentation, at a Committee or Council meeting, the Municipality will be recording you and will make the recording public on the Municipality's website, www.clarington.net/calendar. Written and oral submissions which include home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses become part of the public record. If you have any questions about the collection of information, please contact the Municipal Clerk. Noon Recess: Please be advised that, as per the Municipality of Clarington's Procedural By-law, this meeting will recess at 12:00 noon, for a one hour lunch break, unless otherwise determined by the Committee. Cell Phones: Please ensure all cell phones, mobile and other electronic devices are turned off or placed on non -audible mode during the meeting. Copies of Reports are available at www.clarington.net/archive The Revised Agenda will be published on Friday after 3:30 p.m. Late items added or a change to an item will appear with a * beside them. General Government Committee Pages 1. Call to Order 2. Land Acknowledgement Statement 3. Declaration of Interest 4. Announcements 5. Presentations/Delegations 5.1 Delegation by Marian Timmermans, Board Member, Marigold Hospice 4 Care, Regarding Marigold Hospice Care Update 6. Consent Agenda 6.1 LGS-038-24 - Municipal Law Enforcement Division Service Delivery 15 Review Implementation Response 6.2 FSD-043-24 - South Bowmanville Recreation Complex Air Supported 30 Dome Structure 6.3 FSD-044-24 - South Bowmanville Recreation Complex Skating Trail 36 Refrigeration Equipment 6.4 FSD-045-24 - Supply and Delivery of Two Vacuum Mounted Sweeper 42 Trucks 6.5 FSD-046-24 - Purchasing By-law Review 2024 46 6.6 FSD-047-24 - Supply and Haulage of Granular Material 76 6.7 FSD-048-24 - Supply and Delivery of One -Ton Dump, Two -Ton Dump 81 and Chipper Trucks 6.8 FSD-049-24 - Supply and Delivery of Various Vehicles 87 6.9 PUB-016-24 - Civic Recognition and Dedication Program 93 6.10 PUB-017-24 - Support for Climate -Ready Plans and Processes Grant 105 Program 6.11 PDS-047-24 - North Bowmanville Dog Park Update 109 Page 2 General Government Committee 7. Items for Separate Discussion 7.1 LGS-035-24 - Appointment to the Property Standards Committee 269 (Attachment 1 Distributed under Separate Cover) *7.2 Verbal Update by Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO, Regarding Building Faster Fund 8. Unfinished Business 9. New Business 10. Confidential Items 10.1 LGS-036-24 - CUPE Negotiations for the Renewal Collective Agreement Effective January 1, 2025 (This matter deals with labour relations or employee negotiations) 10.2 LGS-037-24 - Courtice Waterfront Property (This matter deals with a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board) 11. Adjournment Page 3 From: no-re0y(c clarinaton.net To: ClerksExternalEmail Subject: New Delegation Request from Timmermans Date: Friday, October 11, 2024 4:35:46 PM EXTERNAL A new delegation request has been submitted online. Below are the responses provided: • Subject Marigold Hospice Care Update • Action requested of Council Receive for information • Date of meeting 11/4/2024 • Summarize your delegation Provide Council with an update on Marigold Hospice Care • Have you been in contact with staff or a member of Council regarding your matter of interest? Yes • Name of the staff member or Councillor. Mayor Foster • Will you be attending this meeting in person or online? In person • First name: Marian • Single/Last name Timmermans • How to pronounce your name: Mary -an • Firm/Organization (if applicable) Marigold Hospice Care Page 4 • Job title (if applicable) Board Member • Address • Town/Hamlet Bowmanville • Postal code • Email address: • Phone number • Do you plan to submit correspondence related to this matter? No • Do you plan to submit an electronic presentation (i.e. PowerPoint)? If yes, the file must be submitted to the Municipal Clerk's Department by 2 p.m. on the Friday prior to the meeting date. Yes • I acknowledge that the Procedural By-law Permits seven minutes for delegations. Yes [This is an automated email notification -- please do not respond] Page 5 NIARIGOI-41) HOSPICE CARE Marigold Hospice Care: Updates Report to General Government Committee November 4, 2024 Page 6 www.marigoldhospicecare.ca 1 2024 ON TRACK FOR GRAND OPENING I FALL 2025! Am' oil www.mari olg dhospiceca-le.ca 1 2024 Page 7 All MARIGOLD ON TRACK FOR GRAND OPENING I FALL 2025! o We're excited to share that the construction is set to wrap up by late June or early July! o We will need a few weeks to secure the final occupancy permit and get everything ready for our grand opening in September 2025. o We're looking forward to welcoming residents and their families by September or October 2025. www.mari olg dhospicecare.ca 1 2024 Page 8 MARIGOLD Capital and Operating Budget 12024 - 2025! Capital o Total construction $10,011,000 + HST o Fixtures, furnishings & equipment are additional (est $800,000) o Our goal is to raise approximately $1 million to complete the building and for furnishings, fixtures, and equipment Operating o Subsequent to opening, the Ministry of Health provides approximately 60% of our annual operating budget. o Each year, we need to raise an additional (approx.) $800,000 in funds to cover the remaining expenses. o We are also raising additional funds to establish an operating reserve as we ramp up Annual Fundraising. www.marigoldhospicecaie.ca 1 2024 Page 9 111 MARIGOLD Current Budget Updates o Raised to date: $8,500,000* o Ministry and Regional contribution: $2,750,000 Total: $11,250,000 Our budget: o Building $10,011,000 + HST o Furnishings, fixtures & equipment $800,000 (est) *this includes the generous $1 million from the Municipality of Clarington www.mari olg dhospicecaie.ca 1 2024 Page 10 A MARIGOLD OUR IMPACT IN THE COMMUNITY o Our total construction budget is $1090119844 o More than half has been awarded through legal tender process to companies in Durham region. o The highlighted companies are from Clarington. Boyle Excavating Bowmanville $1,692,165.32 Pine Ridge Fencing Bowmanville $16,000.00 Foran's Roofing Whitby $295,000.00 Ducan Ceiling and Bowmanville $585,940.00 Wall Systems RM Painting Pickering $33,000.00 Dalray Contracting Bowmanville $1,716,888.00 JJ McGuire Gen Oshawa $988,025.00 Contractor TOTAL $5,327,018.32 www.mari olg dhospiceca-le.ca 1 2024 Page 11 MARIGOLD Final Notes o You have played a significant role in this journey, and we are truly grateful that the Marigold Hospice is currently under construction. o We are thankful to address a need felt by many in our community and to begin a new chapter of compassionate care in Clarington and beyond. o We look forward to serving our community in Clarington and all individuals in Durham who deserve to navigate their final journey with dignity and comfort. .,I www.mari olg dhospiceca-le.ca 1 2024 Page 12 MARIGOLD Our Ask of You o We need to raise $1 million! This will allow us to acquire essential furnishings, fixtures, and equipment and to build a solid operating reserve to support our mission. o Each year, we need your support to raise $800,000 to ensure our operations run smoothly. o Continue to help us amplify our message! www.mari olg dhospicecaie.ca 1 2024 Page 13 1 MARIGOLD Questions? www.mari old dhospic& e!ta 1 2024 A MARIGOLD Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: LGS-038-24 Submitted By: Rob Maciver, Deputy CAO/Solicitor, Legislative Services Reviewed By: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution #: Authored by: Kristina Bergeron File Number: By-law #: Report Subject: Municipal Law Enforcement Division Service Delivery Review Implementation Response Recommendation: 1. That Report LGS-038-24, and any related delegations or communication items, be received for information. Page 15 Municipality of Clarington Report LGS-038-24 Report Overview Page 2 The Office of the Chief Administrative Officer presented a comprehensive service delivery review to the General government Committee on September 11, 2023, Report CAO-018-23. Since then, the Municipal Law Enforcement Division (MLE) has initiated implementation of the recommendations outlined in the review. This report outlines the actions and enhancements made to date as well as an implementation plan for outstanding recommendations. 1. Background General Government Committee Resolution 1.1 At the General Government Committee meeting on September 11, 2023, Resolution GG-144-23 was approved as follows: That Report CAO-018-23 and any related delegations or communication items, be received; That the recommendations contained in Attachment 1 of Report CAO-018-23, the Municipal Law Enforcement Service Delivery Review, be forwarded to Staff for an implementation plan; That Council endorse the request for a full-time Clerk II position, to be funded out of gapping in 2023, and included in the 2024 budget; That a full-time MLE Officer and a full-time Animal Shelter Clerk I (upgrading current part-time position) be included for consideration in the 2024 budget; and That all interested parties listed in Report CAO-018-23 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Executive Summary 1.2 Over the course of 2023 an internal service delivery review was completed on Municipal Law Enforcement ("MLE") by the Director of Strategic Initiatives. The internal service delivery review was completed by using a methodology of interviewing and surveying staff, while simultaneously reviewing MLE policies, procedures, and software utilized within the division. 1.3 The review resulted in three categories being identified for areas of improvement and operational efficiency: People and Processes, Technology and Equipment, and Standards and Services. Page 16 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report LGS-038-24 1.4 A total of 37 service enhancements were recommended in the MLE Service Delivery Review. Staff had begun initiating and implementing recommendations in the second quarter of 2023 prior to the report being published. As of the date of this report, 32 of the 37 recommendations have been successfully implemented. 2. Implementation Status 2.1 Attachment 1 to this report is the "Municipal Law Enforcement Service Delivery Review Implementation Response", which provides a comprehensive overview of the progress made towards implementing the recommendations from the service delivery review. The document details the improvements and ongoing efforts within our Municipal Law Enforcement operations. 3. Financial Considerations 3.1 The implementation of the recommendations outlined in the "Municipal Law Enforcement Service Delivery Review Implementation Status" document has led to several financial benefits: 3.1.1 Increased Efficiency: The introduction of weekly team meetings, enhanced training, and the development of service level agreements have streamlined operations, reduced administrative burdens and improved overall efficiency. This leads to cost savings by minimizing redundant tasks and optimizing staff time. 3.1.2 Improved Resource Allocation: Hiring additional staff, such as a Clerk II and an MLE Officer, and converting a Clerk I position to full-time at the animal shelter, ensures adequate coverage and addresses workload issues. This reduces overtime costs and improves service delivery. 3.1.3 Technology Enhancements: Investments in technology, such as AMANDA software, mobile printers, and a phone queuing system, have automated many processes, reducing manual work. This not only saves time but also reduces costs associated with inefficiencies and inaccuracies. 3.1.4 Vehicle and Equipment Optimization: Adding GPS to fleet vehicles and increasing the number of vehicles ensures better coverage and more efficient use of resources. This reduces fuel costs and wear and tear on vehicles. 3.1.5 Enhanced Public Engagement: Developing a comprehensive public engagement framework and improving the accessibility of by-law information can lead to better Page 17 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report LGS-038-24 compliance from residents. This reduces the number of violations and associated enforcement costs. 4. Strategic Plan 4.1 Overall, the implementation of actioned recommendations supports the Clarington Strategic Plan 2024-2027 by enhancing organizational performance, leveraging technology, improving service delivery, and fostering community engagement and transparency. They align closely with the Clarington Strategic Plan 2024-2027 in several key areas: 4.1.1 People and Processes - Administration and Clerical Support: Enhancing team meetings, developing service level agreements, and improving training aligns with the strategic goal of fostering a high -performing organization. These actions promote a culture of continuous improvement and effective communication, which are central to the strategic plan's focus on organizational excellence. 4.1.2 Technology and Equipment - Amanda Software and Telephone System: Upgrading software and implementing a phone queuing system support the strategic objective of leveraging technology to improve service delivery. These enhancements ensure that MLE operations are efficient, responsive, and user-friendly, directly contributing to the strategic plan's emphasis on innovation and modernization. 4.1.3 Standards and Services - Service Levels and Community Engagement: Establishing key performance indicators (KPIs), improving reporting mechanisms, and developing a comprehensive public engagement framework align with the strategic goal of enhancing transparency and accountability. These measures ensure that the community is well-informed and that MLE services are delivered effectively and transparently. 4.1.4 Animal Services - Staffing and Coordination: Converting positions to full-time and creating touchdown spaces at the animal shelter align with the strategic plan's focus on providing high -quality services. These actions ensure that animal services are adequately staffed and that there is clear coordination between departments, enhancing service delivery and community satisfaction. 4.1.5 Community Engagement - Public Education and Outreach: Creating and distributing educational materials about by-laws and enforcement standards aligns with the strategic goal of fostering an informed and engaged community. This proactive Page 18 Municipality of Clarington Report LGS-038-24 Page 5 communication strategy ensures that residents are aware of their responsibilities and the services available to them, promoting community well-being and compliance. 5. Concurrence Not Applicable. 6. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that this report be received as information. Staff Contact: Kristina Bergeron, Manager, Municipal Law Enforcement, 905-623-3379 ext. kbergeron2@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Municipal Law Enforcement Service Delivery Review Implementation Response Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 19 Attachment 1 to Report LGS-038-24 Claiftymn Municipal Law Enforcement — Service Delivery Review Implementation Status People and Processes P.1 Administration People and Process was broken down into the following sub -categories: Administration, Clerical Support, and Animal Services. The goals for administrative recommendations were to help MLE establish a better culture of feedback and communication, alleviate administrative burden, and address gaps inside MLE's scheduling. Sub-Catego M . .. . Administration ➢ Conduct weekly Weekly staff meetings scheduled team meetings began in September of to provide ongoing 2023. Minutes are now feedback and staff taken and available for development. review. Administration ➢ Develop written service A committee has been level agreements to clarify established with Fire, roles and responsibilities Building, and Planning. in collaboration with The committee updated Planning and information sharing, Infrastructure, Public defined responsibilities Services, and Council and established a new Services. complaint response process. Administration ➢ Develop a consistent Completed in December schedule for service and of 2023. Further updates clearly communicate the made in May of 2024 to schedule on the website. reflect changes with office relocation. Administration ➢ For consistency and Completed in Spring of transparency, identify on 2024. Due to variance of the website which holidays MLEO availability on MLE Officers will be Holidays/after-hours working, but the office will SOP-LGS-010 was be closed. implemented to monitor/respond to complaints received after regular business hours Page 20 Page 2 Sub -Category Recommendation Administration ➢ Hire a Clerk II to ensure Completed in January of adequate coverage and 2024. First year baseline address the workload data is now available. issues from the increased number of complaints and tickets. Administration ➢ Provide enhanced training Completed in January of to staff on expectations 2024. Clerk II Training regarding in -person and Plan was drafted and phone support for distributed. residents to standardize the customer experience. Administration ➢ Hire an additional MLE Completed in January of Officer to address service 2024. delivery issues. Administration ➢ Given the pending Completed in May of increase in full time fire 2024. service in Courtice and Bowmanville, MLE staff must move back to the MAC. Allow MLE Clerk II to take payments on the ground floor. P.1 Clerical Support The focus of Clerical Support recommendations was to provide better resources, support, and processes to the clerks to further enable them to manage the complaint process more efficiently. Clerical Support ➢ Business Improvement Evaluation of the Specialist to evaluate the process to begin in complaint intake process. 2025. Clerical Support ➢ MLE Clerk II to be Completed in February included in front-line of 2024. Wicket was offering at the MAC. created and Clerk II was stationed there; communications strategy developed and implemented. Page 21 Page 3 • -•• �M MI • •. • Clerical Support ➢ Purchase phone queuing Completed on system to assist with November 21 S', 2023. complaint intake. MILE also provided support with testing for all departments. Clerical Support ➢ Hire a Clerk II to address Completed in January of increased volume, 2024. coverage requirements and workload expectations. P.3 Animal Services Similarly to Clerical Support, recommendations were made to Animal Services to bolster their staff and clearly define roles and responsibilities. Sub -Category W Recommendation Animal Services ➢ Convert Clerk I position at Completed in January of the animal shelter to full- 2024. time to ensure sufficient coverage. Animal Services ➢ Website updated to have Completed in July of animal services complaints 2023. Residents are now sent to MILE email address. prompted to file animal related complaints via the online service portal. Animal Services ➢ Defined service level Completed in January of agreement should be 2024. SOP-LGS-011 prepared between Animal MILE and Animal Service Services and MILE to ensure Clerk 11 duties was staff understand each created. area's responsibilities. Page 22 Page 4 Technology and Equipment T.1 Amanda Software Technology and equipment were broken down into five sub -categories. It was discovered in the review that potential gaps in software usage, and employee knowledge of the various systems may exist. To better service MLE, various recommendations were made to ensure AMANDA was being used for maximum operational efficiency. -- • - •. • 7Amanda ftware ➢ Business Improvement Scoping to begin in Specialists undertake a 2025. MLE are scope review of the continuously working processes built into the with IT to enhance the software. process. Some examples include improving searching capabilities, automated responses, and improving licensing. Amanda Software ➢ Ongoing staff training Completed in July of should be provided for staff 2023. Formal training on to ensure all functionality of the Inspector App and the AMANDA system is Amanda was completed. utilized. Training is ongoing and provided weekly at staff meetings. Amanda Software ➢ Explore the feasibility of Completed in July of installing mobile printers in 2024. (2) mobile test MLE vehicles. printers purchased. Printers are being tested for compatibility and accuracy. IT to configure printers with Inspector App. Field testing expected December 2024. Amanda Software ➢ Investment made to update Completed in 2023. IT training documents to reflect created video training for adoption of the AMANDA the software, Clerks staff software created and updated Page 23 Page 5 Sub -Category Recommendation training documents in a shared location. Amanda Software ➢ Prioritize assistance to IT to Completed in July of fully implement a customer 2023. AMANDA public - portal for MLE services. facing portal was activated. T.2 Telephone System The telephone system was identified as an area of improvement; specifically, where automation and technology could be used to improve the process. Sub -Category Recommendation Telephone System ➢ IT/MLE should purchase, Completed in November and implement, the phone of 2023. queueing system to provide access to a live voice if the caller wishes to wait in the queue. Telephone System ➢ A customer service lens Customer focused should be applied to the messaging is shared at phone response through the weekly staff meeting and development of a customer clerical staff continue to service model. show customer excellence. Training for de-escalation is scheduled in Fall of 2024. Page 24 Page 6 T.3 Vehicles It was identified that additional vehicles were required to provide adequate coverage for MLE. The use of technology in vehicles was recommended to provide more insightful data to the MLE team. IMPROVE 11 Vehicles ➢ MLE Fleet should increase One vehicle was by two vehicles to ensure purchased in Q4 of adequate coverage. 2023. Two additional vehicles have been budgeted and are awaiting purchase. Vehicles ➢ GPS to be added to all Completed in existing and future municipal September of 2024. fleet vehicles. T.4 Office Space The divisions move from 2611 Trulls Road, Courtice to 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville was a major project in 2024. The transition was relatively seamless thanks to the considerable contributions of multiple departments. •?3r*'MYfflr Office Space MLE to move to the MAC Completed in May of and incorporate hoteling 2024. space. T.5 — Body Worn Cameras Many police services in Ontario have started using body -worn cameras (BWCs) to record interactions with the public. However, the adoption of BWCs remains controversial and is not widespread among municipal law enforcement. Unlike police officers, MLE Officers do not engage in detaining, arresting, or physical contact with the public, which limits the applicability of BWCs in their duties. • -•. Body Worn Cameras ➢ Monitor the trend and usage MLE is monitoring the of body worn cameras to usage of body worn improve servicing. cameras at other municipalities. Cameras Page 25 Page 7 are not being used by any local or comparable Municipalities. Standards and Services S.1 — Service Levels Standards and Services was broken down into six categories, the rational behind these recommendations was to provide MLE with measurable data surrounding their processes. This would enable them to make data -driven improvements and decisions. Service Levels ➢ Monthly reporting should be generated from AMANDA to MLE management to review and monitor service levels. Service Levels ➢ As customer service standards are reported, it is recommended that these reports provide the basis of the update meetings between the Manager and officers. Service Levels ➢ The Division should establish a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) and provide a monthly public scorecard. Respective supervisors utilizing AMANDA reporting to monitor files and ensure initial response and resolutions align with policies. Positive trends and identified areas for improvement that are flagged in monthly reports are being utilized to provide both individualized and group constructive feedback and guidance. The data collected through KPIs is now accessible and utilized; Examples include number of days for initial response, number of days to resolve, number of process attempts, Telephone Queue stats (in progress with IT). Page 26 ME Service Levels ➢ A semi-annual report to MLE infographic shared Council on municipal law with Council in January enforcement KPIs should be of 2024 and is now implemented. reoccurring monthly. S.2 Parking Municipal Law Enforcement (MLE) staff oversee various parking activities, with the most significant being the issuance of parking infractions and handling payments. A review of various online dispute mechanisms was identified as a potential improvement to the existing process. Parking ➢ IT to undertake a review of the online dispute mechanisms used by the municipalities listed to determine how Clarington could best implement one to realize the efficiencies. S. 3 Licencing and Permitting First attendances have been modified to make improvements including delegation of this task to full-time officers. A review and cost analysis of implementing technology was also conducted by the Manager of Municipal Law Enforcement. Analysis concluded favorable to await decision on implementation of an Administrative Monetary Penalty system. The Licensing and permitting process was streamlined significantly through the launch of the Service Clarington Portal. MEN"" rLiensin!ga mitting ➢ All application forms should Several improvements be reviewed on a cyclical were made during the Page 27 Page 9 basis to ensure accuracy launch of the online and consistency. portal. Applications are reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis. Licensing and Permitting ➢ The Business Improvement Review to begin in Specialist should be 2025. engaged to review the licensing and permitting processes across the organization. S.4 — Property Property -related complaints encompass a wide array of issues and involve multiple departments and divisions within the Municipality. Effective service delivery relies on clear communication both with the public and among departments. Property S.5 — Animal ➢ The development of an SLA between the various departments/divisions will clarify responsibilities, expectations (internal and external) and process for the overlapping issues. Interdepartmental Committee established to identify and resolve issues. Members include representatives from Fire and Emergency Services, Building Services, and Planning and Infrastructure Services. MLE officers rotate weekly as Animal Officers to handle enforcement activities, but they lacked dedicated office space at the animal shelter. Animal Services ➢ To streamline the focus of Budget approved in the Animal Services December of 2023. division, contract out dead Procurement of contract animal pick-up. required in 2024. Page 28 Page 10 Animal Services S.6 Community Engagement ➢ To create greater coordination between Animal Services and MLE, a touchdown space should be created at the animal shelter. Completed in October of 2024. With many new residents, there's a growing need for accessible information on Clarington's by-laws, which can vary by community. More active communication was recommended to educate residents on by-laws and enforcement standards. Community Engagement ➢ A comprehensive public Communications Plan engagement framework complete October 2024. should be established to Content created to inform residents actively inform and educate the and regularly, particularly public about by-laws those in new and to promote the role neighborhoods. Municipal of MLEO's as Communications Staff community partners. Plan includes key should assist in the messages, deliverables development of the and an annual content framework and calendar. corresponding process used. Page 29 Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: FSD-043-24 Authored by: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer, Finance and Technology Reviewed By: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: Resolution Number: File Number: RFP2024-10 Report Subject: SBRC Air Supported Dome Structure Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-043-24, and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That the proposal received from Farley Manufacturing Inc., being the most responsive bidder meeting all terms and conditions and specifications of RFP2024- 10 be awarded the contract for the Air Supported Dome Structure as part of the South Bowmanville Recreation Complex (SBRC). The scope of work will include assisting the Prime Architect, MJMA with full design/engineering, assistance in preparing tender ready specifications, and drawings; 3. That the total funds required for this project in the amount of $3,362,401.75 (Net HST Rebate) be funded from the approved budget; and 4. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-043-24, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 30 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-043-24 Report Overview Page 2 To request approval to award RFP2024-10 to the most responsive proponent to provide design, engineering, fabrication and installation of the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre Air Supported Dome. 1. Background 1.1 The Municipality of Clarington (Municipality), Project Manager Colliers Project Leaders (Colliers) and Prime Architect MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects Ltd (MJMA) requires the assistance of a qualified manufacturing firm for the provision of the air supported dome structure to be included as part of the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre (SBRC). 1.2 A Request for Proposal (RFP) was drafted with the assistance of Colliers and MJMA to allow the Municipality to select a qualified air supported dome manufacturer for design and installation at the SBRC. 1.3 RFP2024-10 was issued by the Procurement Services Division and advertised electronically on the Municipality's website. The RFP was structured on a two -envelope system with price being an evaluated factor. 2. Analysis 2.1 The RFP closed October 3, 2024. 2.2 The RFP stipulated, among other things, that the proponents were to provide a description of the Firm's team, key qualifications, firm profile, highlights of past service and experience of team members with projects of similar size, nature and complexity, and demonstrate an understanding of the Municipality's requirements. 2.3 Two companies downloaded the document, and two proposals were received (refer to Attachment 1) by the stipulated closing date and time. All proposals received complied with Phase 1 - Mandatory submission requirements and were distributed to the evaluation committee for review, evaluation, and scoring. 2.4 The technical proposals were evaluated and scored independently by the members of the evaluation committee in accordance with the established criteria as outlined in the RFP. The evaluation committee was comprised of staff from the Community Services Division, Colliers and MJMA. Page 31 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-043-24 Page 3 2.5 The evaluation committee met to review and agree upon the overall scores for each proposal. Some of the areas on which the submissions were evaluated were as follows: • The Proponent's understanding of the Municipality's requirements; • Highlights of services provided performing similar work on projects of comparable nature, size, and scope in a municipality of similar population size; • A methodology describing the Proponent's project management approach, work plan, goals, objectives, and methods of communications to be utilized to meet the requested deadlines; and • A proposed solution including a detailed work plan indicating the project method, schedule, Gantt chart, and deliverables showing an estimated overall timeline of the project. 2.6 Upon completion of the evaluation, one submission met the established passing threshold of 80 percent for Phase 2 — Technical Submission and moved to Phase 3 - Pricing. It was determined by the evaluation committee that a presentation from the short-listed proponents would not be required. 2.7 The pricing envelope was opened and evaluated as stipulated in the RFP document. 2.8 The RFP was structured to award using a two -stage approach for the design and construction of the air supported dome structure at the SBRC. 2.9 The Municipality with assistance from Colliers and MJMA will be responsible for the first stage of the project which includes design, and specification development. The second stage costs will be identified as a cash allowance in the facility construction tender documents and will be assumed by the successful General Contractor. 2.10 Upon completion of the evaluation scoring, the recommendation is to award the contract for this work to the highest ranked proponent, Farley Manufacturing Inc. 2.11 Farley Manufacturing Inc. has not provided services to the Municipality previously as such references have been checked and found to be satisfactory. 3. Financial Considerations 3.1 The funding required for this project is $3,362,401.75 (Net HST Rebate) and is in the approved budget allocation as provided and will be funded from the following account: Description Account Number Amount South Bowmanville Recreation 110-42-421-84312-7401 $3,3621402 Centre Page 32 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FSD-043-24 3.2 The Proponent provided pricing for the two stages as noted in item 2.8 above. The fees are allocated between the stages as follows: Stage 1 — Lump Sum for design and shop $71,232 Total net HST rebate drawings Stage 2 — Lump Sum for fabrication and $3,291,170 Total net HST installation rebate 3.3 Stage 1 is related to the design and shop drawing development phase of the project. Stage 2 is related to the fabrication and installation and will be identified as a cash allowance in the facility construction tender documents and will be assumed by the successful General Contractor. 4. Strategic Plan 4.1 This report supports the actions necessary to complete C.4.2 "Begin construction on a new multi -use recreation facility." Specifically, action C.4.2.1 states that the Municipality will complete design and begin construction of the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre. 5. Climate Change The design of the recreation centre incorporates the following measures: energy efficiency, incorporating sustainable materials where feasible which lowers the overall environmental impact of the building. 6. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Deputy CAO of Public Services who concurs with the recommendations. 7. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that Farley Manufacturing Inc. be awarded the contract for the design, fabrication and installation of the air supported dome structure at the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre. Staff Contact: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement, 905-623-3379 ext. 2209 or mchong@clarington.net. Page 33 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-043-24 Attachments: Page 5 Attachment 1 — Summary of Proposals Received Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 34 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-043-24 Page 6 Attachment 1 - Summary of Proposals Received Municipality of Clarington RFP2024-10 — SBRC Air Supported Dome Structure Proposals Received Farley Manufacturing Inc. * 11 Air Structures American Technologies, Inc 11 Note: * Denotes Proponents who were shortlisted. Page 35 Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: FSD-044-24 Authored by: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer, Finance and Technology Reviewed By: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: Resolution Number: File Number: RFP2024-11 Report Subject: SBRC Skating Trail Refrigeration Equipment Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-044-24, be received; 2. That the proposal received from Cimco Refrigeration, being the most responsive bidder meeting all terms and conditions and specifications of RFP2024-11 be awarded the contract for the Skating Trail Refrigeration Equipment as part of the South Bowmanville Recreation Complex (SBRC). The scope of work will include assisting the Prime Architect, MJMA with full design/engineering, assistance in preparing tender ready specifications, and drawings; 3. That the total funds required for this project in the amount of $1,471,042.56 (Net HST Rebate) be funded from the approved budget; and 4. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-044-24, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 36 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-044-24 Report Overview Page 2 To request approval to award RFP2024-11 to the most responsive proponent to provide design and installation of the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre Skating Trail. 1. Background 1.1 The Municipality of Clarington (Municipality), Project Manager Colliers Project Leaders (Colliers) and Prime Architect MacLennan Jaunkalns Miller Architects Ltd (MJMA) requires the assistance of a qualified manufacturing firm for the provision of the skating trail refrigeration equipment to be included as part of the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre (SBRC). 1.2 A Request for Proposal (RFP) was drafted with the assistance of Colliers and MJMA to allow the Municipality to select a qualified refrigeration equipment manufacturer for design and installation at the SBRC. 1.3 RFP2024-11 was issued by the Procurement Services Division and advertised electronically on the Municipality's website. The RFP was structured on a two -envelope system with price being an evaluated factor. 2. Analysis 2.1 The RFP closed October 7, 2024. 2.2 The RFP stipulated, among other things, that the proponents were to provide a description of the Firm's team, key qualifications, firm profile, highlights of past service and experience of team members with projects of similar size, nature and complexity, and demonstrate an understanding of the Municipality's requirements. 2.3 Two companies downloaded the document, and one proposal was received (refer to Attachment 1) by the stipulated closing date and time. The proposal received complied with Phase 1 - Mandatory submission requirements and were distributed to the evaluation committee for review, evaluation, and scoring. 2.4 The technical proposal was evaluated and scored independently by the members of the evaluation committee in accordance with the established criteria as outlined in the RFP. The evaluation committee was comprised of staff from the Community Services Division, Colliers and MJMA. 2.5 The evaluation committee met to review and agree upon the overall score for the proposal. Some of the areas on which the submission was evaluated are as follows: Page 37 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-044-24 Page 3 • The Proponent's understanding of the Municipality's requirements; • Highlights of services provided performing similar work on projects of comparable nature, size, and scope in a municipality of similar population size; • A methodology describing the Proponent's project management approach, work plan, goals, objectives, and methods of communications to be utilized to meet the requested deadlines; and • A proposed solution including a detailed work plan indicating the project method, schedule, Gantt chart, and deliverables showing an estimated overall timeline of the project. 2.6 Upon completion of the evaluation, the submission met the established passing threshold of 80 percent for Phase 2 — Technical Submission and moved to Phase 3 - Pricing. It was determined by the evaluation committee that a presentation from the short-listed proponent would not be required. 2.7 The pricing envelope was opened and evaluated as stipulated in the RFP document. 2.8 The RFP was structured to award using a two -stage approach for the design and construction of the skating trail at the SBRC. 2.9 The Municipality with assistance from Colliers and MJMA will be responsible for the first stage of the project which includes design, and specification development. The second stage costs will be identified as a cash allowance in the facility construction tender documents and will be assumed by the successful General Contractor. 2.10 Upon completion of the evaluation scoring, the recommendation is to award the contract for this work to the highest ranked proponent, Cimco Refrigeration. 2.11 Cimco has provided similar work in the past including the recent renovations to the Newcastle Memorial Arena, Orono Arena, Garnet B. Rickard Recreation Complex, South Courtice Arena and is currently working under Gerr Construction installing the outdoor rink at the Courtice Community Complex. Previous services provided have been found to be satisfactory. 3. Financial Considerations 3.1 The funding required for this project is $1,471,042.56 (Net HST Rebate) and is in the approved budget allocation as provided and will be funded from the following account: Description Account Number Amount South Bowmanville Rec Centre 110-42-421-84312-7401 $1,471,043 Page 38 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FSD-044-24 3.2 The Proponent provided pricing for the two stages as noted in item 2.8 above. The fees are allocated between the stages as follows: Stage 1 — Lump Sum for design and shop $135,341 Total net HST rebate drawings Stage 2 — Lump Sum for fabrication and $1,335,702 Total net HST installation rebate 3.3 Stage 1 is related to the design and shop drawing development phase of the project. Stage 2 is related to the fabrication and installation and will be identified as a cash allowance in the facility construction tender documents and will be assumed by the successful General Contractor. 4. Strategic Plan This report supports the actions necessary to complete C.4.3 "Design and construct outdoor skating amenities." Specifically, action C.4.3.2 states that the Municipality will Integrate an outdoor ice-skating amenity in design plan for South Bowmanville Recreation Centre. 5. Climate Change The design of the recreation centre incorporates the following measures: energy efficiency, incorporating sustainable materials where feasible which lowers the overall environmental impact of the building. 6. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Deputy CAO of Public Services who concurs with the recommendations. 7. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that Cimco Refrigeration be awarded the contract for the design, and installation of the skating trail refrigeration equipment at the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre. Staff Contact: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement, 905-623-3379 ext. 2209 or mchong@clarington.net. Page 39 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-044-24 Attachments: Page 5 Attachment 1 - Summary of Proposals Received Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 40 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-044-24 Page 6 Attachment 1 - Summary of Proposals Received Municipality of Clarington RFP2024-11 — SBRC Skating Trail Refrigeration Equipment Proposals Received Bidder ICimco Refrigeration I Page 41 Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: FSD-045-24 Authored by: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer, Finance and Technology Reviewed By: By-law Number: File Number: Report Subject: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution Number: SS2024-5 Supply and Delivery of Two Vacuum Mounted Sweeper Trucks Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-045-24, and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That Nexgen Municipal Inc. with a total bid amount of $1,182,761.00 (Net HST) being the lowest compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of SS2024-5 be awarded the contract for the Supply and Delivery of Two Vacuum Mounted Sweeper Trucks; 3. That the total estimated funds required for this project in the amount of $1,187,625.00 (Net HST) for truck costs and other costs such as licensing, radios, GPS units, and Clarington lettering and striping in the amount of $4,864.00 (Net HST) be funded by the Municipality as follows: Description Account Number Amount Fleet Replacement Roads - (2024) 110-36-388-83642-7401 $904,500 Additional Funds - Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund 100-36-388-83642-7401 283,125 4. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-045-24, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 42 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-045-24 Report Overview Page 2 To request authorization from Council to award SS2024-5 Supply and Delivery Two Vacuum Mounted Street Sweeper Trucks. 1. Background 1.1 The Public Works Division requires two new vacuum mounted street sweeper trucks. The trucks require a specialized additional water tank with a capacity of 400 gallons due to the distance travelled on Clarington roads. 1.2 The specifications were prepared by the Public Works Division and provided to the Procurement Services Division. A tender was issued and advertised electronically on the Municipality's website. Four bids were received, however upon review all bids were non -compliant and the tender was cancelled. Three bids did not meet the minimum truck specification or the minimum warranty requirement and were deemed non- compliant. One bid, from Nexgen Municipal Inc., met the minimum truck specification however did not meet the minimum warranty requirement and was deemed non- compliant. 1.3 The Public Works Division requires the two new vacuum -mounted street sweeper trucks as soon as possible. The sweeper trucks currently in use are from 2013 and are past their seven-year life cycle, with significant repairs and subsequent downtime. The time to manufacture and deliver the new vacuum -mounted street sweeper trucks is approximately one year. 2. Analysis 2.1 Having determined that there is only one supplier that can meet the sweeper truck specifications, and due to timing, the Public Works Division and the Procurement Services Division mutually agreed that a direct sole source process would be used with Nexgen Municipal Inc. for the procurement of two vacuum mounted street sweeper trucks. The warranty requirement was amended to align with industry standards in the sole source specification. 2.2 Pricing from Nexgen Municipal Inc. was provided to the Procurement Services Division for review and consideration. 2.3 After review and analysis by the Public Works Division and the Procurement Services Division, it was mutually agreed that Nexgen Municipal Inc. be recommended for award of contract SS2024-5. Page 43 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report FSD-045-24 2.4 NexGen Municipal Inc. has satisfactorily provided similar equipment to the Municipality of Clarington in the past and references did not need to be checked. 3. Financial Considerations 3.1 The cost of the two vacuum -mounted street sweeper trucks exceeds the allocated budget by $283,125 (Net HST Rebate). The additional funds required to complete this project will be funded from the Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund. 3.2 The total funds required for this project in the amount of $1,187,625.00 (Net HST Rebate) include $1,182,761.00 (Net HST Rebate) for truck costs and other costs such as licensing, radios, GPS units, and Clarington decal lettering and striping in the amount of $4,864.00 (Net HST Rebate) is within the approved budget allocation and will be funded by the Municipality as follows: Description Account Number Amount Fleet Replacement Roads - (2024) 110-36-388-83642-7401 $904,500 Additional Funds - Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund 100-36-388-83642-7401 283,125 3.3 Queries with respect to the department needs should be referred to the Director of Public Works. 4. Strategic Plan Not applicable. 5. Climate Change Electric or hybrid vacuum mounted street sweeper trucks that meet the Municipality's specification requirements are not available on the market. 6. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Deputy CAO, Public Services and the Director of Public Works who concur with the recommendations. Page 44 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-045-24 7. Conclusion Page 4 It is respectfully recommended that NexGen Municipal Inc., being the lowest compliant bidder, be awarded the contract for Supply and Delivery of Two Vacuum Mounted Street Sweeper Trucks in accordance with the terms and conditions of SS2024-5. Staff Contact: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement, 905-623-3379 Ext 2209 or mchong@clarington.net. Attachments: Not Applicable Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 45 Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: FSD-046-24 Authored by: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer, Finance and Technology Reviewed By: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: Resolution Number: File Number: Report Subject: Purchasing By-law Review 2024 Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-046-24, and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That the By-law attached to Report FSD-046-24, as Attachment 1, be approved; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-046-24, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 46 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-046-24 Report Overview Page 2 To request authorization from the Council to repeal the existing Purchasing By-law No. 2021-077 and enact a Procurement By-law which incorporates the principles set out in this report. 1. Background Review of the By-law is conducted periodically 1.1 Pursuant to section 270 of the Municipal Act, 2001, municipalities are required to establish procurement policies and procedures. Purchasing By-law 2021-077 was reviewed in accordance with Part 5- General Provisions, Section 89, which mandates a detailed review of the by-law at least every five years. The proposed updated By-law (Attachment 1) repeals the existing By-law 2021-077. 1.2 The most recent review was undertaken in early 2021 and resulted in Council enacting the current version of the Purchasing By-law in October 2021. The Purchasing By-law amendments approved in 2021, were administrative in nature. These amendments focused on operational improvements, while still preserving the overarching principles of competition, fairness, transparency, and accountability. Modernization of Procurement Procedure 1.3 Since the last review of the By-law, the Municipality transitioned to online bidding, aiming to enhance the efficiency, accessibility, and modernization of its bidding process. This shift streamlined operations by reducing paperwork and processing time, while expanding opportunities for a wider range of vendors to participate. By leveraging online platforms, the Municipality improved transparency, allowing for better tracking and oversight of bids. Proposed new Procurement By-law aligns with Digital Advancements 1.4 The transition to e-bidding prompted a review of the By-law to align with modern technology and practices. By revisiting the By-law, the Municipality aims to ensure that it accurately reflects current operations. 1.5 Jointly, the Legal Services Division and the Procurement Services Division consulted with key stakeholders to discuss revisions to the Purchasing By-law for the purpose of modernizing the Municipality's purchasing policies and procedures, and to address operational improvements. Meetings were held to review the various sections of the By- law. While some of the changes are substantive, many of the changes are administrative. Page 47 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report FSD-046-24 2. Analysis Proposed Procurement By-law reflects procedural changes and support good governance 2.1 Staff recommend the repeal of the existing Purchasing By-law and the enactment of the proposed Procurement By-law to reflect procedural changes, ensure compliance with trade agreements and support good governance. This includes focusing on ways in which the Municipality may be more responsive to business needs in executing Council's mandate while still preserving the overarching principles of competition, fairness, transparency, and accountability. 2.2 The changes proposed will allow Procurement staff to focus on higher dollar value purchases and shorten the lead time for procurement of goods and services, leading to improved efficiency. 2.3 Many provisions remain unchanged, as efforts were made to preserve as much of the existing language as possible. Areas requiring additional clarity have been simplified and redrafted. The key By-law changes include: • By-law divides competitive procurements into low, medium, and high value acquisitions • New procurement limits defined for low, medium, and high value acquisitions to reflect market changes • The Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) would be authorized to approve all awards within budget and in compliance with the By-law • Enhanced criteria for the disqualification of bidders • Removal of local preference • Content procedural in nature has been excluded from the By-law and will be dealt with as part of complementary management directives and standard operating procedures By-law divides procurements into low, medium, and high value acquisitions 2.4 Purchases are characterized into low, medium, and high value acquisitions, eliminating the need for formal quotations for acquisitions under $100,000. Low value acquisitions can be purchased directly by the Departments without the need for a Purchase Order, streamlining the process for smaller purchases. Medium value acquisitions require three quotes, where appropriate, and the lowest compliant bid is received. High value Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FSD-046-24 acquisitions over $100,000 will continue to be publicly tendered to align with treaty requirements. 2.5 This approach aligns with practices adopted by other municipalities, which have also moved toward more efficient procurement processes by eliminating formal quotations for low and medium value acquisitions while still maintaining competitive requirements. This framework ensures accountability, flexibility, and responsiveness to operational needs. 2.6 As a result of creating the new categories, the dollar value limits are redefined to align with the updated procurement framework as outlined below. Category Proposed Dollar Value Limit Procurement Process Low -Value Acquisition Up to $10,000 One quote Medium -Value Acquisition $10,000.01 to $100,000 Three quotes High -Value Acquisition Greater than $100,000 Publicly tendered The CAO is authorized to approve awards for goods and services within budget 2.7 Currently, all awards for the purchase of goods and services over $500,000 must be approved by Council, even if the successful bidder is the lowest compliant bidder for tenders or the proponent submitting the proposal with the highest score. Once proposals are evaluated and scores assigned by the evaluation committee or the tender submissions have been compliance checked, the Municipality is bound to follow through with the award recommendation, provided the award is within budget. This is to maintain the integrity of the procurement process and avoid liability. 2.8 The new By-law proposes that the CAO be authorized to approve awards for goods and services, excluding consulting and professional services, within budget constraints. Consulting and professional services will still require Council approval to award contracts, with the current limit being raised to $100,000 to align with High Value Acquisition limits. 2.9 Staff surveyed surrounding municipalities, and it was determined that many have shifted to this approach. See Schedule A for the survey results. Page 49 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-046-24 Page 5 2.10 All awards over $500,000 for the purchase of goods and services, excluding consulting and professional services, will be reported to the Council on a biannual basis for information detailing the awards made during the reporting period. Enhanced criteria for the disqualification of bidders 2.11 The existing By-law includes a section on bid rejection, primarily focused on procedural errors, such as improper bid submission, ongoing litigation, and unpaid dues and violations. Staff recommend replacing this section with a disqualification provision. The disqualification clause sets out the parameters to not accept a bid from vendors, and the roles and responsibilities to disqualify a bidder. 2.12 This revision ensures that the most capable and reliable vendors are considered by disqualifying those with a documented history of poor performance, misconduct, or violations of applicable regulations. In doing so, the Municipality mitigates potential legal, financial, and reputational risks. Removal of local preference section 2.13 The proposed revisions include eliminating the local preference section, to ensure compliance with the Discriminatory Business Practices Act (R.S.O. 1990, Chapter D12). The purpose and intent of the Discriminatory Business Practices Act (R.S.O. 1990, Chapter D12) is to "prevent discrimination in Ontario on the ground of race, creed, colour, nationality, ancestry, place of origin, sex or geographical location of persons employed in or engaging in business". In accordance with the legislation, engaging in business includes "selling goods and services to or buying goods and services from". 2.14 The Act defines a person to include "a partnership, sole proprietorship, unincorporated association and governmental agency" and further states "No person in Ontario shall engage in a discriminatory business practice". Where a corporation is convicted of an offence under the Act, the maximum penalty that may be imposed upon the corporation is $100,000. 2.15 As an alternative to a local preference clause in the By-law, the Municipality can support local businesses to increase participation in the bidding process by developing an internal directory of local vendors, organizing workshops, presenting at local boards, and hosting networking events. Content procedural in nature has been excluded from the By-law and will be dealt with as part of complementary management directives and standard operating procedures 2.16 Staff will prepare management directives and standard operating procedures which support the By-law but will not form part of the By-law. Relocating procedural content from the By-law to management directives and standard operating procedures Page 50 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report FSD-046-24 represents a significant advancement in enhancing the organization's governance and operational efficiency while still preserving essential oversight by Council. This change empowers the Municipality to respond adeptly to evolving operational needs and regulatory requirements. 2.17 These directives and procedures will be prepared in accordance with the Clarington Policy System (CP-001) and maintained by Procurement Services and include the following: Title Description Invitational competition for medium This directive sets out the procedures and value acquisitions requirements for purchasing medium value acquisitions. Non-competitive procurements (Single This directive sets out the procedures and and Sole Source) requirements for acquiring goods and services through a sole or single source purchase. Bid opening and verification This directive sets out the steps and identifies roles and responsibilities for opening bids. Bonds and bid deposits This directive sets out the bond and bid deposit requirements. Tied bid procedure This directive sets out the process and roles and responsibilities for tied bids. 3. Financial Considerations 3.1 The Procurement By-law proposed in this report will continue to support the Municipality's objectives of obtaining goods and services in a fair, accountable, and transparent manner, while protecting the financial and operational best interests of the Municipality. Page 51 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-046-24 4. Concurrence Page 7 4.1 Department Heads have been consulted during the review process and the report has been reviewed by the Deputy CAO/Solicitor who concurs with the recommendation. 5. Conclusion 5.1 It is respectfully recommended that the By-law attached to this report as Attachment #1 be passed. 5.2 The By-law facilitates efficient procurement processes and effectively meets the operating requirements of the Municipality's operating Departments while ensuring appropriate controls and accountability measures. Staff Contact: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement, 905-623-3379 Ext 2209 or mchong@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Procurement By-law 2024-xx Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 52 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-046-24 Schedule A Page 8 Location Year of By-law CAO Comments Enactment Number authorized to approve all awards within budget YES or NO City of Barrie 2024 2024- Yes 075 City of Oshawa No CAO approval up to $2 million City of Pickering No Only up to $250,000 Town of Ajax 2023 68-2023 No CAO approval up to $500,000 Township of 2022 3148- Yes Brock 2022-Fl Town of Cobourg 2012 016- No Council approval required for 2012 purchases over $50,000 Town of No Council approval required for Richmond Hill competitive acquisitions over $500,000 Town of Whitby Yes With report to Council for information Town of Scugog No CAO approval up to $100,000 Town of Uxbridge 2022 2022- Yes Semi-annual report to Council 154 for information Township of Yes Brock Regional 2020 16-2020 Yes Semi annual report to Council Municipality of for information Durham Regional 2021 2021- Yes Report to Council for Municipality of 103 information York City of 2022 0013- Yes Department Head if over Mississauga 2022 $500,000. Commissioner for city-wide contracts. City of Vaughan 2023 15.C.03 Yes City Manager 1 For competitive procurements of goods and services and excludes awards for consulting and professional services work over $100,000. Includes CAO and delegates. Page 53 Attachment 1 to Report FSD-046-24 Procurement By-law 2024-XX Table of Contents Part1 — Interpretation.............................................................................................................. 3 Definitions.............................................................................................................................. 3 WordUsage........................................................................................................................... 7 Severability............................................................................................................................. 7 References............................................................................................................................. 7 Applicationand Restrictions................................................................................................... 7 Part 2 — Responsibilities and Authorities............................................................................... 8 DepartmentHeads................................................................................................................. 8 ApprovalAuthority.................................................................................................................. 8 SigningAuthority..................................................................................................................... 9 Part3 — Bid Types and Limits................................................................................................. 9 Low Value Acquisitions(LVA)................................................................................................. 9 Medium Value Acquisitions(MVA).......................................................................................... 9 High Value Acquisitions (HVA)............................................................................................... 9 Requestfor Tender................................................................................................................10 Requests for Proposal...........................................................................................................10 RoutinePurchases................................................................................................................11 UnsolicitedProposals............................................................................................................11 Non -Competitive Process (Sole and Single Source Purchases) and Negotiations.................11 Emergency Purchases..........................................................................................................12 Product Demonstrations and Information...............................................................................12 Pre-qualification.....................................................................................................................13 Bondsand Deposits..............................................................................................................13 Changesto Bids under Call...................................................................................................14 Withdrawalof Bids.................................................................................................................14 AbsoluteRight.......................................................................................................................14 Approval Limits and Reporting................................................................................................14 Council Recess Procedures..................................................................................................15 Consulting and Professional Services (Excluding Schedule "A" Exemptions) ........................16 Co-operative Purchasing.......................................................................................................16 Part 4 — General Purchasing Policies....................................................................................17 Default by Successful Bidder.................................................................................................17 Page 54 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 2 Disqualification of Bidders.....................................................................................................17 Conflictof Interest.................................................................................................................18 Access and Disclosure..........................................................................................................18 Records Retention and Destruction.......................................................................................18 Complaints and Inquiries.......................................................................................................18 Lobbying................................................................................................................................19 PurchasingCards..................................................................................................................19 Disposalof Goods.................................................................................................................19 OverExpenditures.................................................................................................................19 Sustainable Procurements.....................................................................................................20 Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 (AODA)...............................................20 Part 5 — General Provisions....................................................................................................20 By-law Review.......................................................................................................................20 Repeal...................................................................................................................................20 EffectiveDate........................................................................................................................20 Schedule«A.............................................................................................................................21 Page 55 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 3 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-law 2024-XX Being a By-law to provide policies and procedures for the procurement of goods and services. Whereas pursuant to section 270 of the Municipal Act, 2001, the Municipality is required to establish and maintain policies with respect to its procurement of goods and services; And Whereas the Municipality wishes to procure goods and services in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible; and And Whereas the Municipality is committed to ensuring that its procurement policies and procedures are fair, open and transparent. Now therefore the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington hereby enacts as follows: Part 1 — Interpretation Definitions 1) For the purpose of this by-law, "Acquisition" means the purchase of a Good and/or Service for use on a permanent or temporary basis; "Bid" means a Quotation, Tender or Proposal; "Bidder" is a Person who responds to a Bid Solicitation; "Bid Solicitation" means a request by the Municipality for Bids for the provision of Goods and/or Services through an RFP, RFQ, RFT or other request permitted by the terms of this by-law; "CAO" means the Chief Administrative Officer of the Municipality or a designate; "Clerk" means the Municipal Clerk of the Municipality or a designate; "Committee" means the General Government Committee of Council; Page 56 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 4 "Consulting and Professional Services" means services provided by architects, engineers, designers, environmental consultants, surveyors, management and financial consultants, bankers, auditors, brokers, soil consultants, web designers or any other consultant or professional, but does not include any consulting and professional services referred to in Schedule "A"; "Contract" means any form of binding agreement between the Municipality and the Contractor; "Contractor" means any legal entity to whom a Contract is awarded; "Co-operative Purchasing" means the participation of the Municipality with one or more public agencies, school boards, vendors of record (Provincial), hospitals, not -for -profit agencies or group procurement organizations in a Bid Solicitation; "Council" means the Council of the Municipality; "Department" means a Department of the Municipality identified on the annual organization charts and reflected in the prevailing budget; "Department Head" means the Deputy CAO of the Department or a designate; "Emergency" means a situation or the threat of an impending situation which, in the opinion of the CAO or a Department Head, requires an immediate Acquisition to prevent serious delays, damage to a basic service, risk to health and safety, financial loss or to maintain or restore a basic service provided by the Municipality; "Expression of Interest" or "EOI" means general market research used prior to a Bid Solicitation to determine if there is an interest in a proposed Acquisition; "Goods and/or Services" means any goods and/or services required by the Municipality other than goods and/or services listed in Schedule "A"; "High Value Acquisition" or "HVA" means an Acquisition with a Total Cost of more than $100,000; "Local Board" means a local board (as that term is defined in the Municipal Act, 2001) of the Municipality; "Low Value Acquisition" or "LVA" means an Acquisition with a Total Cost of $10,000 or less without the need to issue a Bid Solicitation; "Manager of Procurement" means the Manager of Procurement for the Municipality or a designate; "Medium Value Acquisition" or "MVA" means an Acquisition with a Total Cost of more than $10,000 and which does not exceed $100,000; Page 57 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 5 "Municipality" means The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington; "Person" includes an individual, association, firm, partnership, corporation, union, trust, organization, trustee or agent, and their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns; "Personal Purchase" means a purchase of Goods and/or Services requested by an elected official, an appointed official or by any other employee of the Municipality that is not required for the purposes of the Municipality or a Local Board; "Pre -qualification" means a procedure whereby a prospective Bidder satisfies the Municipality that it is capable of supplying a particular Good and/or Service as a condition of being allowed to submit a Bid; "Proposal" means an offer from a Bidder made in response to an RFP; "Purchase Order" means a Contract or a written acceptance of a Proposal, issued on forms prescribed by the Manager of Procurement; "Purchasing Card" means a credit card issued by the Manager of Procurement in accordance with the by-law; "Quotation" means an offer from a Bidder made in response to an RFQ; "Regional Bid" means a Bid submitted by a Bidder who owns a business within the Regional Municipality of Durham; "Request for Information" or "RFI" means a request used as general market research tool to determine the availability of Goods and/or Services that will meet business or operational requirements and Procurement strategies and/or to estimate costs for the purpose of developing a Bid solicitation; "Request for Pre -qualification" or "RFPQ" means a request with specific qualification criteria used to identify and pre -select qualified Bidders for participation in multistep procurement processes; "Request for Proposal" or "RFP" means a form of Bid Solicitation in which the Municipality invites one or more potential suppliers to submit proposals with respect to the supply of particular Goods and/or Services, which the Manager of Procurement in consultation with the Department Head, determines may be dependent upon non -price factors and may require negotiations between a Bidder and the Municipality before a Contract is made between them; "Request for Quotation" or "RFQ" means a form of Bid Solicitation in which the Municipality requests either informal quotations or formal quotations; Page 58 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 6 "Request for Tender" or "RFT" means a form of Bid Solicitation in which the Municipality publishes the specifications, terms, conditions and details concerning a proposed Contract, and invites or advertises prospective Bidders to submit Tenders; "Responsive and Responsible Bidder" means a Person responding to a Bid Solicitation who complies with its provisions and who can reasonably be expected to provide satisfactory performance of a proposed Contract based on reputation, references, performance on previous contracts, and proof of sufficient financial and other resources; "Roster" means a prequalified list of Persons that may respond to Bid Solicitations and/or may be invited to compete for discrete work assignments, as and when required; "Single Source Purchase" means a non-competitive purchase where there are other suppliers of the product or service available, however, for reasons such as emergency, proprietary, matching existing equipment, health and safety concerns, time constraints, or other reasons, the purchase is sourced to a specific vendor; "Sole Source Purchase" means a non-competitive purchase where there is only one supplier of the product or services and as a result a competitive quotation process is not possible; "Tender" means an offer received from a Bidder in response to an RIFT; "Term Order" means a contract which states a fixed length of time during which the contract will be in effect; "Total Cost" means the cost of acquisition for the full term of a contract excluding the Harmonized Sales Tax, and in the case of a contract containing renewal provisions, means the total cost to the Municipality for the initial term and potential renewal terms, including all applicable fees, charges, disbursements and any price escalations identified in the contract; "Total Revenue" means, where revenue is payable to the Municipality under a contract, the total revenue payable during the full term of the contract, excluding the Harmonized Sales Tax, and, in the case of a contract containing renewal provisions, means the total revenue payable to the Municipality for the initial term and all potential renewal terms; "Treasurer" means the Deputy CAO/Treasurer of the Municipality or a designate; "Unsolicited Proposal" means proposals received by the Municipality from a Person who have approached the Municipality with a proposal that has not been requested through a Bid Solicitation. Page 59 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 7 and "Weighted Evaluation Criteria" means criteria that are taken into account when evaluating Proposals including qualitative, technical and pricing considerations. Word Usage 2) This by-law shall be read with all changes in gender or number as the context may require. 3) A grammatical variation of a defined word or expression has a corresponding meaning. Severability 4) Should any section or part of this by-law be held by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the remainder of this by-law shall not be affected. References 5) In this by-law, a reference to any Act, By-law or Policy is a reference to that Act, By-law or Policy as it is amended or re-enacted from time to time. 6) Schedule "A" (Exempt Goods and/or Services) is attached to and forms part of this by-law. 7) All references to dollar figures are Canadian dollars. 8) Unless otherwise specified, a reference in this by-law to a clause, section or Schedule is a reference to a clause, section or Schedule in this by-law. Application and Restrictions 9) The procurement procedures set out in this by-law shall apply to all Acquisitions made by or on behalf of the Municipality except as may be expressly exempted or restricted under this by-law. 10) This by-law shall not apply to the Acquisition of any Goods and/or Services listed in Schedule "A". 11) Where a proposed contract provides for the Municipality to receive revenue from the supplier, or where the proposed contract includes both revenue and costs, the procedures and authority limits set out in this by-law which are applicable to the Total Cost of the Contract shall be construed as applicable, with necessary changes, to the total revenue payable or the combined total of revenue payable and Total Costs under the Contract. Page 60 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX 12) This by-law shall be read and interpreted in conjunction with its Schedules, and all applicable written policies, management directives and procurement procedures. 13) In any case where another Municipality policy, directive or procedure is perceived to limit or contravene the requirements of this by-law, the language of this by-law shall govern. Where an applicable trade agreement conflicts with this by-law, the trade agreement shall prevail. Part 2 — Responsibilities and Authorities Department Heads 14) Each Department Head shall have responsibility for the Acquisition of Goods and/or Services for their Department(s) in accordance with the terms of this by- law. Manager of Procurement 15) The Manager of Procurement shall have the authority to act as an agent of the Municipality for the purpose of acquiring all Goods and/or Services required by the Municipality. 16) The Manager of Procurement is authorized to develop management directives and standard operating procedures to support this by-law. 17) The Manager of Procurement shall determine the method of Acquisition having regard to the nature, importance or urgency associated with the purchase requisition, subject to the general trade practice, market conditions and the provisions of this by-law. Approval Authority 18) No employee of the Municipality shall have the authority to make or approve an Acquisition or award a Contract for any Goods and/or Service unless funds for such Acquisition have been allocated in a budget approved by Council. If a recommended Bid is in excess of an approved budget limit but within the approval limits of this by-law, the Treasurer, after consultation with the Department Head, must approve the source of additional funding. 19) Contracts shall not be split so as to circumvent the established method of purchase or the approval limits imposed by this by-law unless, in the opinion of the Manager of Procurement, after consultation with the Department Head, it is deemed advantageous to acquire components of a major project through separate Contracts. Page 61 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 9 Signing Authority 20) Authority to make or approve an Acquisition or award a Contract for any Goods and/or Service includes the power to sign all documents necessary to effect the Acquisition or any amendment, assignment or interim extension of the Contract. Where a Department Head or the CAO has the authority to sign a Contract, the Manager of Procurement may sign on their behalf. Part 3 — Bid Types and Limits Low Value Acquisitions (LVA) 21) Department Heads shall have authority to purchase Low Value Acquisitions as required at the lowest available Total Cost meeting specifications and do not require the submission of a Purchase Order (unless one is required by the vendor); 22) If a term order or another form of Contract is established for the Goods and/or Service to be acquired, then the Department must purchase from the Contract vendor. 23) Computers, software, computer accessories and cell phones must be ordered in coordination with IT Services, using a Purchase Order. 24) Office furniture must be ordered in consultation with Procurement Services, using a Purchase Order. Medium Value Acquisitions (MVA) 25) The Manager of Procurement shall have the authority to purchase Medium Value Acquisitions at the lowest available Total Cost meeting specification, provided a minimum of three quotations have been received where they are reasonably required and possible to obtain. High Value Acquisitions (HVA) 26) The CAO shall have the authority to purchase High Value Acquisitions. Subject to sections 27 to 42, High Value Acquisitions must be publicly advertised. The methods for requesting Bids include, but are not limited to: (a) Request for Expression of Interest (EOI); (b) Request for Information; (c) Request for Pre -qualification; (d) Request for Proposal; (e) Request for Tender; Page 62 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 10 (f) A multi -step process which may involve a combination of the above. Request for Tender 27) All Request for Tenders will be called, opened and awarded in accordance with this by-law and established management directives and standard operating procedures. 28) The Request for Tender shall be publicly advertised or issued to vendors on a prequalified list. 29) The Request for Tender will be issued by Procurement Services. Bids will be received electronically, opened and results posted publicly on the Municipality's bidding website. 30) Where the tender meeting specifications and offering the lowest Total Cost is acceptable, an award shall be made in accordance with section 65. Requests for Proposal 31) Irrespective of the anticipated Total Cost, where the Manager of Procurement in consultation with the Department Head determines that a proposed Acquisition involves unique or complicated circumstances, the Acquisition may be made through the use of an RFP. 32) All RFPs will be called, opened and awarded in accordance with this by-law and established procedures. 33) The Request for Proposal shall be publicly advertised or issued to vendors on a prequalified list. 34) The Request for Proposal will be issued by Procurement Services. Bids will be received electronically, opened and results posted publicly on the Municipality's bidding website. 35) The RFP submission process consists of an electronic two -envelope system: one digital file contains the technical proposal, and the second contains the financial proposal. 36) In an RFP evaluation, the technical proposal is assessed against weighted criteria. The financial proposal is reviewed only if the bidder qualifies based on the technical evaluation. 37) RFPs may be called by public advertisement or invitation to specific Bidders for Low Value Acquisitions and Medium Value Acquisitions. All High Value Acquisitions shall be publicly advertised. Page 63 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Page 11 38) All RFPs shall be submitted in the prescribed manner and delivered to the Manager of Procurement in accordance with the bid documents. Routine Purchases 39) Where, in the opinion of the Manager of Procurement in consultation with the Department Head, a proposed Acquisition is of a routine and repetitive nature, the Manager of Procurement may combine similar purchases and follow the process outlined in this by-law for an Acquisition with a Total Cost of the sum of the Total Costs of the Acquisitions so combined. Unsolicited Proposals 40) Unsolicited Proposals received by the Municipality shall be reviewed by the Department Head and Manager of Procurement. Any procurement resulting from the receipt of an Unsolicited Proposal shall comply with the provisions of this by- law. Non -Competitive Process (Sole and Single Source Purchases) and Negotiations 41) All Non -Competitive purchases exceeding the Low Value Acquisition threshold must be assessed by the Manager of Procurement prior to any negotiations or discussions with the Person; 42) In place of a Bid Solicitation, Goods and/or Services may be purchased through negotiation as Single Source or Sole Source purchases where, in the opinion of the Manager of Procurement in consultation with the Department Head that one or more of the following conditions apply and a process of negotiation is undertaken to obtain the best value in the circumstances for the Municipality: (a) Sole Source: (1) Scarcity of supply in the market; (2) A statutory or market -based monopoly; or (3) Existence of exclusive rights (patents, copyright or licenses). (b) Single Source: (1) The sources of supply are restricted to the extent that there is no effective price competition: (i) for which there is no reasonable substitute or competitive product; or (ii) for which compatibility with an existing product/service is the overriding consideration. Page 64 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 12 (2) The purchase involves specialized preassembled goods; (3) The Bid from the lowest Responsive and Responsible Bidder substantially exceeds the estimated Cost; (4) No Bid from a Responsive and Responsible Bidder is received, and it is impractical to issue another Bid Solicitation; (5) The extension or reinstatement of an existing Contract would prove most cost-effective or beneficial to the Corporation; (6) The terms and conditions of a Proposal provide for negotiation with the selected Bidder; or (7) Council has specifically authorized an Acquisition through negotiation. 43) In the case of a Contract for a construction project, negotiations shall be conducted in accordance with the Canadian Construction Documents Committee (CCDC) Document 23 published by the Canadian Construction Association where expressly required by the provisions of an RFT. 44) All Single Source and Sole Source Acquisitions shall be confirmed through a Purchase Order and shall be reported to Council through a report prepared jointly by the Department Head and the Manager of Procurement if the Total Cost exceeds $500,000 or an approved budget limit. Emergency Purchases 45) In the case of an Emergency, an Acquisition may be authorized without issuing a Bid Solicitation. 46) Emergency Acquisitions shall be made by the Manager of Procurement in consultation with the Department Head. In the absence of the Manager of Procurement, Emergency Acquisitions may be made by a Department Head. 47) All Emergency Acquisitions with a Total Cost over the Low Value Acquisition limit shall be confirmed through a Purchase Order and shall be reported to Council through a report prepared jointly by the Department Head and the Manager of Procurement if the Total Cost exceeds $500,000 or an approved budget limit. Product Demonstrations and Information 48) No requests for prices or demonstrations for approved projects or programs above the Low Value Acquisition limit shall be made without prior consultation with the Manager of Procurement. 49) Requests on behalf of the Municipality may be made by Department Heads for informal non -binding product and technical information, catalogues and price lists for Low Value Acquisition and Medium Value Acquisition. Each Department Head shall provide the Manager of Procurement with such data, specification details and Page 65 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 13 information relating to a proposed Medium Value Acquisition, including the Municipality's approved budget prices. Pre -qualification 50) The Manager of Procurement may issue a request for Pre -qualification for the purpose of selecting qualified Persons to respond to a Bid Solicitation 51) The Manager of Procurement may also issue a request for Pre -qualification for the purpose of establishing a roster of qualified Persons that may respond to a Bid Solicitation and/or may be invited to compete for discrete work assignments, as and when required; 52) Requests for Pre -qualification must be publicly posted to solicit responses from all interested Persons; 53) The Pre -qualification of Persons shall not create any contractual obligation between the Municipality and the pre -qualified Persons. The Municipality is not required to proceed with any further procurement process following a Request for Pre -qualification; 54) If, in the opinion of the Manager of Procurement, Pre -qualification is required, the Contract, if awarded at all, must be awarded to the lowest Responsive and Responsible Bidder for RFTs, and to the highest scoring Responsive and Responsible Bidder for RFPs, who has been pre -qualified for a competitive roster, and in accordance with the Bid Solicitation for rotational rosters. Bonds and Deposits 55) All Bid deposits shall be submitted in accordance with the Bid Solicitation; 56) When the deposit of a performance bond and/or labour and material payment bond is a requirement of a Bid Solicitation, such bonds shall be, (a) in the amounts specified in the Bid Solicitation; (b) issued by a licensed surety company authorized to carry on business in Ontario; (c) in a form approved by the Municipality; and (d) delivered by the Bidder to the Manager of Procurement prior to execution of the Contract. 57) Following the Award of a Contract, all deposits shall be returned to the unsuccessful Bidders in accordance with the Bid Solicitation. Retained Bid Page 66 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 14 deposits shall be held until the Contract is executed by the Municipality, unless otherwise determined by the Manager of Procurement. 58) Following the cancellation of a Bid Solicitation, all deposits shall be returned to the Bidders in accordance with the Bid Solicitation. 59) If a successful Bidder fails to enter into a Contract, the Bid deposit may be forfeited to the Municipality at the sole discretion of the Municipality. If a Bid bond is deposited, it may be called by the Treasurer and the amount of money thereby obtained shall be forfeited to the Municipality. Changes to Bids under Call 60) Interpretations of, or qualifications or changes to, a Bid Solicitation shall be made in the form of a written addendum. Addenda shall be necessary to revise, delete, substitute or add to a Bid under call. The Manager of Procurement shall approve the issuance of any addendum or the cancellation of a Bid Solicitation. 61) A copy of each addendum or a notice of posting of each addendum shall be forwarded to registered Bidders by electronic means and posted on the Municipality's website. 62) The Manager of Procurement in consultation with the Department Head and Municipal Solicitor shall have the authority to cancel a Bid Solicitation either before or after Bids are opened in accordance with the Bid opening procedures. Withdrawal of Bids 63) A Bid can only be withdrawn prior to the close of Bids, as stipulated in the Bid Solicitation. Requests to withdraw received following the close of Bids shall not be accepted. Absolute Right 64) The Municipality shall have absolute discretion in the Award of Contracts and retains the right to reject any or all Bids, or to Award to a Bid other than the lowest Bid or highest ranking Bid if in the best interest of the Municipality. Approval Limits and Reporting 65) For Acquisitions of Goods and/or Services excluding Consulting and Professional Services: (a) For Medium Value Acquisitions, the Manager of Procurement shall submit to the Department Head a recommendation for the Department Head's approval. Page 67 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 15 (b) For High Value Acquisitions, after consulting with the Department Head, the Manager of Procurement shall prepare a report to the CAO for approval if the Total Cost of the Goods and/or Services: (1) Was obtained through a competitive procurement process in accordance with this by-law; (2) Does not exceed 10% of the approved budget amount up to $250,000; (3) Recommendation to award to the lowest Responsible and Responsive Bidder meeting specifications for quotations and tenders; (4) Is awarded to the Person submitting a proposal with the highest overall score. 66) A summary report to Committee for information relating to awards made for acquisitions with a total cost exceeding $500,000 and awarded under section 65 shall be prepared and submitted to the Committee on a semi-annual basis. 67) Council approval is required if: (a) Competitive procurements do not meet the requirements of section 65; (b) Council approval is required by statue or by a third party such as a funding agency; (c) The CAO recommends that Council approval be sought; (d) Any recommended award for High Value Acquisitions is not to the lowest Responsive and Responsible Bidder or highest scoring Bidder meeting specifications; or (e) Where otherwise specifically required by this by-law. Council Recess Procedures 68) Notwithstanding section 67, where a matter which would have otherwise been submitted to Committee requires approval during any of Council's recesses, including elections, the CAO shall be authorized to award the Contract if the Treasurer is of the opinion that the price is reasonably reflective of the approved budget allocation and/or is part of the normal operating responsibility of the Department. 69) The Manager of Procurement shall report all Contracts awarded under section 68 to Committee as soon as possible after the conclusion of the recess. 70) Council shall not vary any action or decision of the Contract awards made in accordance with section 68. '� Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 16 Consulting and Professional Services (Excluding Schedule "A" Exemptions) 71) Where it is estimated that the Cost of Consulting and Professional Services will be less than or equal to $25,000, the Department must notify the Manager of Procurement and may obtain the services directly without issuing a Bid Solicitation. 72) Where it is estimated that the Total Cost of Consulting and Professional Services will be more than $25,000, the Manager of Procurement shall issue a Bid Solicitation in compliance with this by-law and prepare a report to the CAO for approval. 73) Where it is estimated that the Total Cost of Consulting and Professional Services will be more than $100,000, the Manager of Procurement shall issue a Bid Solicitation, in consultation with the Department Head and shall submit a report to Council providing a recommendation for award. 74) Where a roster has been established for Consulting and Professional Services, in compliance with this by-law, Council approval to award a contract under the roster shall only be required for awards in excess of the threshold set out by the Canada Free Trade Agreement (CFTA). 75) An external consultant who has entered into a Contract for Consulting and Professional Services for a particular phase of a project, may be deemed to have a conflict of interest and be disqualified from submitting a Bid on a later phase of consulting services for the same project. Any issue as to whether there is a conflict of interest shall be determined by the Manager of Procurement in consultation with the Department Head. This section shall not apply where a consultant has been requested to provide a budget estimate or general review and estimate for a potential Acquisition. 76) Any consultant authorized to issue a Bid Solicitation on behalf of the Municipality shall comply with this by-law. Co-operative Purchasing 77) Co-operative Purchasing shall be utilized when advantageous and practical, where it is in the best interest of the Municipality to do so. 78) The decision to participate in Co-operative Purchasing agreements will be made jointly by the Manager of Procurement and the responsible operating Department. 79) In the event of any conflict, the procurement by-law and procurement practices of the Municipality, school board, hospital, non-profit agency or group procurement organization issuing the co-operative Bid shall take precedence over the provisions of this by-law. Page 69 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 17 Part 4 — General Purchasing Policies Default by Successful Bidder 80) If a successful Bidder fails to execute the Contract or fails to meet any of the requirements of the Contract within the prescribed time, the Contract may be awarded to the next lowest Bidder or highest ranked Bidder or cancelled. 81) If a successful Bidder defaults on an awarded Contract, the Manager of Procurement is authorized to take remedial action including termination of the Contract and all necessary steps to ensure completion of the project or continued service/supply which includes but not limited to, amending and approving assignments, and extending on an interim basis. 82) Should the Manager of Procurement determine that termination of the awarded Contract is the appropriate action in accordance with 81, the Department Head shall be advised of the termination in writing. Disqualification of Bidders 83) The Manager of Procurement in consultation with the Department Head and Municipal Solicitor shall have the authority to not accept a Bid from any Bidder and/or award a Contract to any Bidder where one of the following circumstances has occurred within the last five years: (a) The Bidder is or has been involved in litigation with the Municipality, its elected officials or employees; (b) The Bidder has failed to pay an amount owed to the Municipality when due and owing; (c) There is documented evidence of poor performance, non-performance or default by the Bidder in respect to any Contract issued by the Municipality, and the Bidder has been made aware of such performance issues; (d) The Bidder has withdrawn its Bid on a previous Bid Solicitation after Bids have been opened by the Municipality; (e) The Bidder has demonstrated abusive or threatening conduct towards the Municipality's elected officials or employees, their agents and representatives; (f) The Bidder has been convicted of any criminal offence pursuant to applicable legislation or regulations including the Occupational Health and Safety Act, as amended, where circumstances of that conviction demonstrated a disregard for the safety of tis workers, the Municipality's employees or the general public; or Page 70 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 18 (g) The Bidder has been criminally charged or committed dishonest conduct, and in the opinion of the Manager of Procurement and the Municipal Solicitor, the Award of the Contract is likely to expose the Municipality to legal, financial or reputational risk. Conflict of Interest 84) The participation of members of Council and employees of the Municipality in the procurement process shall be governed by, in the case of members of Council, the Council Code of Conduct and the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.M.50 as amended and, in the case of employees, by the Code of Ethics Policy E1. 85) No employee or Council member shall benefit directly or indirectly from affiliation with the Municipality or show any favouritism to any Person in the procurement of any Goods and/or Services. 86) No Person shall offer incentives to any employee of the Municipality or member of Council. 87) No Personal Purchases shall be made by the Municipality for any member of Council, member of a Local Board, or employees of the Municipality. Access and Disclosure 88) No employee of the Municipality or any member of Council shall have access to or disclose any details regarding Bids except as permitted by this by-law and the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.M.56 as amended. 89) In the case of a Bid submitted in response to an RFP, only the total Bid amount for the successful Bid shall be provided and only upon written request of any Person after completion of negotiations and Award of the Contract. Records Retention and Destruction 90) Bid documents and related material shall be retained in accordance with the Municipality's Records Retention Schedule, as amended. Complaints and Inquiries 91) Bidders and potential Bidders shall only communicate with Procurement Services about Bid Solicitations, including making any inquiries or complaints. Bidders and potential Bidders shall not communicate with an elected official, the CAO, a Department Head or any member of staff about Bid Solicitations without the consent of Procurement Services. Page 71 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Page 19 92) All Bidder or potential Bidder complaints or inquiries addressed to an elected official, the CAO, a Department Head or any member of staff shall be referred to Procurement Services. Lobbying 93) All prospective Bidders are prohibited from lobbying any member of Council, Municipal staff and consultants, appointed members and any staff of any Board during the period commencing at the time of issuing a Bid Solicitation and ending at the time of the Award of the Contract. The Municipality may reject any Bid by a Bidder that engages in such lobbying, without further consideration, and may terminate that Bidder's right to continue in the Bid Solicitation process, and may be grounds for disqualification from future Bid Solicitations. Purchasing Cards 94) Purchasing Cards may be used for all purchases as defined by the Treasurer, where the Goods and/or Services do not fall under the requirements of this by- law. Purchasing Cards are issued on an as needed basis upon approval of the Manager of Procurement and at the request of the Department Head. The Manager of Procurement shall be responsible for the program as defined by the Treasurer. Disposal of Goods 95) The disposal of surplus or obsolete goods of the Municipality shall be the responsibility of the Manager of Procurement. At least once each calendar year, Department Heads shall provide the Manager of Procurement with a list of such goods. The Manager of Procurement may periodically circulate a list of surplus or obsolete goods to all Departments and Local Boards. 96) Surplus or obsolete goods must be offered to the Departments first. 97) The Manager of Procurement, in consultation with the appropriate Department Head, shall determine the appropriate method of disposal including sale, RFT, RFP, auction, or gratuitous transfer to a Local Board, other municipality, school board, charity or not for profit organization. 98) No Municipal employee, officer or elected official will personally obtain any surplus or obsolete goods unless it is obtained through a public process. Over Expenditures 99) Subsequent to a Contract Award, the approval of any over expenditure shall be in accordance with the Municipality's Financial Control Policy (CP-014) or subsequently adopted policy for financial controls. Page 72 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 20 Sustainable Procurements 100) In keeping with the Municipality's strategic priority of sustainability and climate change, acquisitions shall ensure that, wherever reasonably possible, specifications shall provide for expanded use of durable products, reusable and/or recyclable products and products (including those used in services) that minimize negative impacts on the environment without significantly affecting the intended use of the product or service. It is recognized that analysis of total lifecycle cost is required in order to ensure that the products are made available at competitive prices. Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 (AODA) 101) When procuring Goods and/or Services, the Municipality shall incorporate accessibility design criteria and features, except where it is not practicable to do so. Where applicable, procurement documents shall specify the desired accessibility criteria to be met and provide guidelines for the evaluation of the proposals respecting those criteria. Part 5 — General Provisions By-law Review 102) The Manager of Procurement in consultation with appropriate staff shall conduct a detailed review of this by-law no less frequently than every five years. Repeal 103) By-law #2021-077 is hereby repealed. Effective Date 104) This by-law shall take effect on the date that it is passed by Council. Passed in Open Council this day of Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk Page 73 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 21 Schedule "A" EXEMPT GOODS AND SERVICES 1. Petty Cash Items 2. Training and Education a. Conferences b. Courses C. Conventions d. Magazines e. Memberships f. Periodicals g. Seminars h. Staff Development i. Staff Workshops j. Staff Reports k. Subscriptions I. Trainers (Includes Workshop & Seminars) 3. Refundable Employee Expenses a. Advances b. Meal Allowances C. Miscellaneous d. Travel Expenses e. Entertainment Expenses 4. Employer's General Expenses a. Payroll Deduction Remittances b. Medicals C. Licenses (Vehicles, Software, Communications, etc.) d. Debenture Payments e. Insurance f. Grants and Agencies g. Damage Claims h. Petty Cash Replenishment i. Land & Building Lease Payments Made by Municipality j. Tax Remittances k. Sinking Fund Payments I. Newspaper Advertising and Public Notices M. Day Camp or Other Similar Admission Fees n. Software or Equipment Maintenance Agreements 5. Certain Professional and other Services a. Committee Fees b. Counselling Services Page 74 Procurement By-law No. 2024-XX Paae 22 C. Laboratory Services d. Nursing Services e. Physician Fees f. Temporary Help g. Banking Services h. Legal Services i. Newspaper, Radio, TV Advertising j. Policing k. Red Cross Supplies I. Web Design Usage Fee & Penalties M. Payroll Fees n. Employee Assistance Programs 6. Utilities (including Hedging Agreements in accordance with the Hedging Policy as may be amended from time to time) a. Postage b. Water C. Hydro d. Gas (Including Hedging Agreements) e. Telephones — Excluding Cellular f. Telecommunications Infrastructure 7. The acquisition or disposition of all interests in real property, including personal rights in real property, and all consulting and professional services relating to personal rights or interests in real property. 8. Contracts with Canadian National and Canadian Pacific Railways for Goods and/or Services 9. Contracts with Provincial and/or Federal Government Agencies or Crown Corporations for Goods and/or Services 10. Contracts with the Regional Municipality of Durham or other municipalities located within the Regional Municipality of Durham for Goods and/or Services 11. Election related technology and equipment, and any consulting and support services directly related to such technology and equipment. Page 75 Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: FSD-047-24 Authored by: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer, Finance and Technology Reviewed By: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: Resolution Number: File Number: CL2023-32 Report Subject: Supply and Haulage of Granular Material Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-047-24, and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That Robert E. Young Construction Ltd. having successfully completed the initial one-year term with a total bid amount of $219,999.94 (Net HST), be awarded the second -year term with a total estimated bid amount of $165,487.87 (Net HST), being the lowest compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of CL2023-32 for Supply and Haulage of Granular Material; 3. That pending satisfactory performance and price, the Manager, Procurement, in consultation with the Director of Public Works, be given the authority to extend the contract for this service for up to three additional one-year terms for a total estimated five-year contract value of $1,100,000 (Net HST); 4. That the total estimated funds required for this project for the second -year term in the amount of $165,487.87 (Net HST) be funded by the Municipality as provided. The estimated funds required for the third, fourth and fifth -year terms are included in future budget accounts: Description Account Number Amount 100-36-382-10280-7112 GR PATCH/RESURF-MISC OPER SUPPLY $165,487.87 5. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-047-24, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 76 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-047-24 Report Overview Page 2 To request authorization from Council to award tender CL2023-32 Supply and Haulage of Granular Material to the lowest compliant bidder. 1. Background 1.1 Tender specifications for the supply and haulage of granular material were developed by the Public Works Division and provided to the Procurement Services Division. 1.2 Tender CL2023-32 was issued by the Procurement Services Division and advertised on the Municipality's website. The tender closed on August 25, 2023, with three bids received, and two were compliant. 1.3 After review and analysis by the Public Works Division and the Procurement Services Division, it was mutually agreed that the low, compliant bidder, Robert E. Young Construction Ltd. be recommended for award of $219,999.94 (Net HST) for the first contract year of tender CL2023-32. 1.4 The work under the contract was required to start in September of 2023. Due to the work's timing and expected start date, in keeping with the Purchasing By-law, a CAO report was prepared recommending the award of the first contract year to Robert E. Young Construction Ltd. (PS Report 023-23). 2. Analysis 2.1 Robert E. Young Construction Ltd. has successfully completed the supply and haulage work in the first contract year. 2.2 After review and analysis by the Public Works Division and the Procurement Services Division, it was mutually agreed that Robert E. Young Construction Ltd. be recommended for award of the second -year term, and up to three additional optional years. 3. Financial Considerations 3.1 The cost for the first -year term was $219,999.94 (Net HST). The estimated cost for the second -year term is this work is $165,487.87 (Net HST) and will be funded by the Municipality as provided. Future budget accounts include the funds required for the third, fourth and fifth -year terms. Page 77 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-047-24 Page 3 Description Account Number Amount 100-36-382-10280-7112 GR PATCH/RESURF-MISC OPER SUPPLY $165,487.87 3.2 Pricing submitted for Supply and Haulage of Granular Material is to remain firm for the second year of the contract. For future contract years, the unit prices would be adjusted on the anniversary date of the contract award by the annual percentage change in the most recent issuance of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), All Items, Ontario, as published by Statistics Canada and the pricing will remain firm for the contract year. 3.3 The total estimated contract value for one year plus four optional additional years is approximately $1,100,000 (Net HST). 3.4 Queries with respect to the Department's needs should be referred to the Director of Public Works. 4. Strategic Plan. Not applicable. 5. Climate Change Not Applicable. 6. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Deputy CAO, Public Services and the Director of Public Works who concur with the recommendations. 7. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that Robert E. Young Construction Ltd. being the lowest compliant bidder, be awarded the contract for Supply and Haulage of Granular Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of Tender CL2024-32. Staff Contact: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement, 905-623-3379 Ext 2209 or mchong@clarington.net. Attachments: Page 78 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-047-24 Attachment 1 — Bid Summary Interested Parties: Page 4 List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 79 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-047-24 Attachment 1 — CL2023-32 Bid Summary Municipality of Clarington Summary of Bid Results CL2023-32 Supply and Haulage of Granular Material Page 5 Bidder One -Year Total Bid* (Net HST Rebate) Potential Five -Year Total Bid (Net HST Rebate Robert E Young Construction Ltd. $220,000 $1,099,999.69 Glenn Windrem Trucking* 285,940 1,429,700.01 CDR Young Aggregates 320,763 1,603,816.36 Summary reflects an estimated annual stockpiling quantity. * Denotes non -compliant bid. '� Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: FSD-048-24 Authored by: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer, Finance and Technology Reviewed By: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: Resolution Number: File Number: CL2024-34 Report Subject: Supply and Delivery of One -Ton Dump, Two -Ton Dump and Chipper Trucks Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-048-24, and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That Finch Auto Group with a bid amount of $288,947.52 (Net HST) being the low, compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of CL2024-34 be awarded the contract for the supply and delivery of three one -ton dump trucks; 3. That Blue Mountain Chrysler Ltd. with a bid amount of $137,416.70 (Net HST) being the low, compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of CL2024- 34 be awarded the contract for the supply and delivery of one two -ton dump truck; 4. That Downtown Autogroup with a bid amount of $278,946.55 (Net HST) being the low, compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of CL2024-34 be awarded the contract for the supply and delivery of two chipper trucks; 5. That the total estimated funds required for this project in the amount of $712,950 (Net HST) include $705,310.77 (Net HST) for three one -ton dump trucks, one two - ton dump truck and two chipper trucks, and other costs such as licensing, radios, GPS units and Clarington decal lettering and striping in the amount of $7640 (Net HST) be funded by the Municipality as provided. Description Account Number Amount Fleet Replacement Roads - (2024) 110-36-388-83642-7401 $335,925 Fleet Replacement Roads - (2023) 110-36-388-83642-7401 97,589 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-048-24 Page 2 Description Account Number Amount Fleet New Parks — (2024) 110-36-388-83616-7401 $140,746 6. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-048-24, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 82 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-048-24 Report Overview Page 3 To request authorization from Council to award CL2024-34 for the supply and delivery of three one -ton dump trucks, one two -ton dump truck and two chipper trucks. 1. Background 1.1 Tender specifications for Supply and Delivery of One -Ton Dump, Two -Ton Dump and Chipper Trucks were prepared by the Public Works Division and provided to the Procurement Services Division. 1.2 Tender CL2024-34 was issued by the Procurement Services Division and advertised electronically on the Municipality's website. 1.3 Ten plan takers downloaded the tender document. 1.4 The tender closed on August 23, 2024. 2. Analysis 2.1 Four bids were received in response to the tender call. Bidders could choose to submit a bid for one or more truck types, with the award of each truck type going to the lowest - priced bidder. 2.2 The bids were reviewed and tabulated by the Procurement Services Division (see Attachment 1) and deemed compliant. The results were forwarded to the Public Works Division for their review and consideration. 2.3 After review and analysis by the Public Works Division and the Procurement Services Division, it was mutually agreed that the low -compliant bidders be recommended for the following award of tender CL2024-34: • Finch Auto Group for the supply and delivery of three one -ton dump trucks. • Blue Mountain Chrysler Ltd. for the supply and delivery of one two -ton dump truck. • Downtown Autogroup for the supply and delivery of two chipper trucks. 2.4 Finch Auto Group, Blue Mountain Chrysler and Downtown Autogroup have not worked for the Municipality in the past; however, references were checked and were satisfactory. Page 83 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-048-24 3. Financial Considerations Page 4 3.1 The total estimated funds required for the project in the amount of $712,950 (Net HST) include $705,310.77 (Net HST) for the new trucks and other costs such as licensing, radios, GPS units and Clarington decal lettering and striping in the amount of $7,640 (Net HST) is in the approved budget allocation as provided and will be funded from the following account: Description Account Number Amount Fleet Replacement Roads - (2024) 110-36-388-83642-7401 $335,925 Fleet Replacement Roads - (2023) 110-36-388-83642-7401 97,589 Fleet Replacement Parks — (2024) 110-36-388-83650-7401 138,690 Fleet New Parks — (2024) 110-36-388-83616-7401 140,746 4. Strategic Plan Not applicable. 5. Climate Change Electric or hybrid one -ton dump, two -ton dump and chipper trucks that meet the Municipality's specification requirements are not available on the market. 6. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Deputy CAO, Public Services and the Director of Public Works who concur with the recommendations. 7. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that the lowest compliant bidders be awarded the following contract, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Tender CL2024-34: • Finch Auto Group for the supply and delivery of three one -ton dump trucks. • Blue Mountain Chrysler Ltd. for the supply and delivery of one two -ton dump truck. • Downtown Autogroup for the supply and delivery of two chipper trucks. Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-048-24 Page 5 Staff Contact: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement, 905-623-3379 Ext 2209 or mchong@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Bid Summary Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 85 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-048-24 Page 6 Attachment 1 — CL2024-34 Bid Summary Municipality of Clarington Summary of Bid Results Tender CL2024-34 Supply and Delivery of One -Ton Dump, Two -Ton Dump and Chipper Trucks Bidder Total Bid (Including HST) Total Bid (Net HST Rebate) Finch Auto Group $320,863.5 $288,947.52 Blue Mountain Chrysler Ltd. 810,872.2 730,215.51 Downtown Autogroup 825,614.2 743,491.12 Lunar Contracting 1,067,038.7 960,901.36 *Bidders could bid on one, or more, type of truck with the award of each truck type going to the lowest compliant bidder. '� Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: FSD-049-24 Authored by: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer, Finance and Technology Reviewed By: By-law Number: File Number: Report Subject: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution Number: CL2024-35 Supply and Delivery of Various Vehicles Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-049-24, and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That Forbes Motors Inc. with a bid amount of $106,025.76 (Net HST) being the low, compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of CL2024-35 be awarded the contract for the supply and delivery of two full electric SUVs; 3. That Blue Mountain Chrysler Ltd. with a bid amount of $292,254.72 (Net HST) being the low, compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of CL2024- 35 be awarded the contract for the supply and delivery of four crew cab 3/4 ton pick- up trucks; 4. That Downtown Autogroup with a bid amount of $397,381.78 (Net HST) being the low, compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of CL2024-35 be awarded the contract for the supply and delivery of two full electric half -ton crew cab 4x4 pick-up trucks, one standard cab % ton long box 4x4 pick-up truck, and two crew cab one -ton 4x4 pick-up trucks; 5. That the total estimated funds required for this project in the amount of $817,225 (Net HST) include $795,662.25 (Net HST) for vehicle costs and other costs such as licensing, radios, GPS units and Clarington decal lettering and striping in the amount of $21,563 (Net HST) be funded by the Municipality as provided: Description Account Number Amount Fleet Replacement Roads - (2023) 110-36-388-83642-7401 $65,003 Page 87 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-049-24 Page 2 Description Account Number Amount Fleet Replacement Roads - (2024) 110-36-388-83642-7401 285,516 Green Fleet Replacement Roads — (2024) 110-36-388-83645-7401 65,844 Fleet New Parks — (2024) 110-36-388-83616-7401 150,048 C/S FAC Admin — Fleet — (2024) 110-42-388-83691-7401 140,868 MLEO Fleet Replacement — (2024) 110-19-388-81917-7401 109,946 6. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-049-24, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-049-24 Report Overview Page 3 To request authorization from Council to award CL2024-35 for the supply and delivery of nine trucks and two SUVs. 1. Background 1.1 Tender specifications for Supply and Delivery of Various Vehicles were prepared by the Public Works Division and provided to the Procurement Services Division. 1.2 Tender CL2024-35 was issued by the Procurement Services Division and advertised electronically on the Municipality's website. 1.3 Sixteen plan takers downloaded the tender document. 1.4 The tender closed on October 7, 2024. 2. Analysis 2.1 Four bids were received in response to the tender call. Bidders could choose to submit a bid for one or more vehicle types, with the award of each vehicle type going to the lowest -priced bidder. 2.2 The bids were reviewed and tabulated by the Procurement Services Division (see Attachment 1) and deemed compliant. The results were forwarded to the Public Works Division for their review and consideration. 2.3 After review and analysis by the Public Works Division and the Procurement Services Division, it was mutually agreed that the low -compliant bidders be recommended for the following award of tender CL2024-35: • Forbes Motors Inc. for the supply and delivery of two full electric SUVs. • Blue Mountain Chrysler Ltd. for the supply and delivery of four crew cab % ton pick-up trucks; • Downtown Autogroup for the supply and delivery of two full electric half -ton crew cab 4x4 pick-up trucks, one standard cab % ton long box 4x4 pick-up truck, and two crew cab one -ton 4x4 pick-up trucks. 2.4 Blue Mountain Chrysler and Downtown Autogroup have been awarded work for the Municipality in the past. Forbes Autogroup has not worked for the Municipality in the past and references were checked and were satisfactory. Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-049-24 3. Financial Considerations Page 4 3.1 The total estimated funds required for the project in the amount of $817,225 (Net HST) include $795,662.25 (Net HST) for new vehicles and other costs such as licensing, radios, GPS units and Clarington decal lettering and striping in the amount of $21,563 (Net HST) is in the approved budget allocation as provided and will be funded from the following account: Description Account Number Amount Fleet Replacement Roads - (2023) 110-36-388-83642-7401 $65,003 Fleet Replacement Roads - (2024) 110-36-388-83642-7401 285,516 Green Fleet Replacement Roads — (2024) 110-36-388-83645-7401 65,844 Fleet New Parks — (2024) 110-36-388-83616-7401 150,048 C/S FAC Admin — Fleet — (2024) 110-42-388-83691-7401 140,868 MLEO Fleet Replacement — (2024) 110-19-388-81917-7401 109,946 4. Strategic Plan Not applicable. 5. Climate Change Electric SUVs and electric half -ton crew cab trucks are recommended for award. Electric or hybrid one -ton and % ton pick-up trucks that meet the Municipality's specification requirements are not available on the market. 6. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Deputy CAO, Public Services and the Director of Public Works who concur with the recommendations. 7. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that the lowest compliant bidders be awarded the following contract, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Tender CL2024-35: Page 90 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report FSD-049-24 • Forbes Motors Inc. for the supply and delivery of two full electric SUVs. • Blue Mountain Chrysler Ltd. for the supply and delivery of four crew cab 3/4 ton pick-up trucks; • Downtown Autogroup for the supply and delivery of two full electric half -ton crew cab 4x4 pick-up trucks, one standard cab 3/4 ton long box 4x4 pick-up truck, and two crew cab one -ton 4x4 pick-up trucks. Staff Contact: Mandy Chong, Manager, Procurement, 905-623-3379 Ext 2209 or mchong@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Bid Summary Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 91 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-049-24 Attachment 1 — CL2024-35 Bid Summary Municipality of Clarington Summary of Bid Results Tender CL2024-35 Supply and Delivery of Various Vehicles Page 6 Bidder Total Bid (Including HST) Total Bid (Net HST Rebate) Highbury Ford Sales Limited $131,167.62 $145,655.87 Downtown Autogroup 397,381.78 441,274.97 Blue Mountain Chrysler Ltd. 571,292.85 634,395.56 Forbes Motors Inc. 910,956.83 1,011,577.46 *Bidders could bid on one, or more, type of vehicle with the award of each vehicle type going to the lowest compliant bidder. Page 92 Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: PUB-016-24 Authored by: Christina Bruno, Business Coordinator, Public Services; Vanessa Bilenduke-Guppy, Supervisor Community Engagement and Events, Public Services, Community Services Division Submitted By: Lee -Ann Reck, Deputy CAO, Public Services Reviewed By: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: Resolution Number: File Number: Report Subject: Civic Recognition and Dedication Program Recommendations: 1. That Report PUB-016-24, and any related delegations or communication items, be received. 2. That Council adopt the proposed draft Civic Recognition and Dedication Policy, attached as Attachment 1, to identify the programs in place by the Municipality to recognize or memorialize individuals and organizations for their outstanding achievements or contributions to the community; 3. That Council repeal the following polices: a. Flag Protocols Policy F105 b. War Dead and War Veteran Names for Streets Policy PSD-DG010 c. Recognition of Individuals in Memoriam Policy PSD-DG014 4. That Council provide Staff the authority to manage changes in funding categories to the Community Funding Program through a Management Directive, including the recommendations in this policy and future updates to align with corporate priorities. 5. That all interested parties listed in Report PUB-016-24, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 93 Municipality of Clarington Report PUB-016-24 Report Overview Page 2 As directed in Report CAO-007-23 and Report PUB-009-24, this report is prepared for Council to approve the Civic Recognition and Dedication Policy. The policy identifies how the Municipality of Clarington will support residents in recognizing individuals and organizations for their achievements or their contributions to the community. The policy will also manage dedications, otherwise referred to as the "Civic Recognition and Dedication Program". 1. Background 1.1 February 27, 2023, Council revoked the Naming of Municipal Buildings/Facilities Policy under Report CAO-007-23. Repealing this policy eliminated a means for the Municipality to recognize individuals' contributions to the community. Therefore, Staff was directed to create a civic recognition and dedication program to outline the means that the Municipality will take to recognize individuals and organizations for their personal accomplishments and contributions. 1.2 Prior to Report CAO-007-23, Council approved the flag raising protocol policy F105, war dead and war veteran's street naming policy (PSD-DG010) and the recognition of individuals in memoriam policy (PSD-DG014) as forms of recognizing beloved members of the community. These distinct policies share the same purpose to recognize individuals and organizations within our community. 1.3 On April 8, 2024, Council received a funding request from Orono Town Hall to support the 125th year anniversary milestone celebration. As a result of Orono Town Hall's request and similar milestone funding requests, staff were directed to establish a timeline and criteria for receiving milestone funding requests, including how to fund those requests. 1.4 An existing Community Funding Program and associated budget was approved in Fall 2020, through CSD-009-20 and in an update through CSD-015-22. 2. Recommendations 2.1 Staff recommends that Council revoke Polices F105, PSD-DG010 and PSD-DG014 approve the Civic Recognition and Dedication Program Policy (Attachment 1). Bringing all separate documents under the one policy provides clearer direction to staff. Details from all revoked polices will be maintained through Management Directives. 2.2 The policy documents existing recognition and dedication programs into one comprehensive policy (Attachment 1). The combination of existing processes and polices ensures clarity for staff when considering these requests from members of the public. Page 94 Municipality of Clarington Report PUB-016-24 Page 3 2.3 In response to public requests, staff have included a formal tree and bench dedication program as part of the proposed policy. This allows a means for individuals, organizations or corporations to honor people in memorial or for outstanding achievements in the community. 2.4 Council directed staff to develop a program to outline how Heritage anniversary milestones would be recognized. Staff have proposed that funding requests be accepted by staff, with eligibility up to $5,000.00 through the Community Funding Program (as outlined in the policy). 2.5 As a result of the recommendations in this report, staff are recommended changes to the existing funding streams in the Community Funding Program. As recommended, staff are requesting that this, and future updates be aligned with the strategic plan or resolutions from council and that updates be managed through the updating of a Management Directive. 2.6 The update to the funding program would include one stream and include the ability for applicants to identify which area of the strategic plan their application pertains to. This allows staff to incorporate both the heritage milestones, community safety initiatives (to address Intimate Partner Violence) and arts and culture. The scoring and award committee will remain intact and staff will continue to post the scoring rubric and application information on the Clarington Web Site. 3. Future Considerations 3.1 As an extension to the recommended policy, staff have benchmarked against other municipalities and realized that many Municipalities offer a Civic Awards program to publicly honour outstanding accomplishments by members of the community. 3.2 Staff will undertake engagement with the community in 2025, to develop a Civic Awards program. This will provide a program for residents and members of Council to nominate community members for outstanding accomplishments. The program will include a nomination process, eligibility criteria and various award categories. 3.3 As part of the development of the program, staff will recommend how awards will be presented and celebrated. 4. Financial Considerations The Community Funding program is currently part of the approved Multi -Year Operating budget. Since the program update in 2020, the current funding levels of $69,500 have not been fully awarded under the program. Staff identify the current amount of funding is sufficient to include support for Heritage celebrations in the Community Funding Program. Page 95 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PUB-016-24 5. Strategic Plan The recommendations in this report align with Council's objectives to: a) Be a leader in the delivery of efficient, effective and meaningful municipal services by increasing opportunities for civic engagement and public participation; b) To cultivate a strong, thriving and connected community where everyone is welcome by recognizing and celebrating the growing diversity of the community and the promotion and support for the local arts, culture, and heritage sectors, and; c) To promote responsible and balanced growth by protecting and enhancing Clarington's natural heritage. 6. Climate Change The tree planting dedication program described herein supports the environmental goals found in the 2024-2027 Strategic Plan. As leaders, anticipating and addressing the impacts of climate change, Staff will select the tree species to be planted with consideration to adequate environmental tolerance and disease resistance. The aesthetic and environmental benefits of tree planting within our Parks and Cemeteries will support urban forests. 7. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Deputy CAO, Planning and Infrastructure who concurs with the recommendations. 8. Conclusion 8.1 It is respectfully recommended that Council approve the draft policy as in Attachment 1. This will consolidate various policies aimed at the same intent and provide more clarity to staff. Staff will prepare a management directive with updated information on Community Funding Streams to support Heritage milestones and other alignments with strategic priorities. Upon approval of this report, staff will complete the creation of management directives to provide succinct direction on how to operationalize the policy requirements and work towards development of a Civic Awards Program. Page 96 Municipality of Clarington Report PUB-016-24 Page 5 Staff Contact: Christina Bruno, Business Coordinator, Public Services, cbruno clarington.net or Vanessa Bilenduke-Guppy, Supervisor Community Engagement and Events, Public Services, Community Services Division, vbilend uke-guppV(a-)_clarington.net Attachments: Attachment 1 — Draft Civic Recognition and Dedication Program Policy CP-XXX Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 97 Attachment 1 to Report PUB-016-24 Council Policy Clar*wji If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 Number: CP-XXX Title: Civic Recognition and Dedication Program Type: Community Relations Sub -type: Owner: Public Services Approved By: Council Approval Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Effective Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Revised Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Applicable to: All Staff 1. Legislative or Administrative Authority: 1.1. This policy is developed in accordance with Report CAO-007-23 whereby staff is directed to create a Civic Recognition Program to provide the Municipality of Clarington a means to recognize individuals and organizations for their outstanding achievements or contributions to the community. 1.2. Report PUB-009-24 wherein staff is directed to develop a policy for managing milestone celebration funding requests. 2. Purpose: 2.1. This policy is established to: 2.1.1. Identify the parameters for recognizing individuals and community groups for achievements and valuable work they do for our community. 2.1.2. Provide a means for citizens to dedicate items within the Municipality to commemorate a loved one or pay tribute to a person's/ organization's individual or community accomplishments. 2.1.3. To determine which milestones the Corporation celebrates through the Community Funding Program. Page 1 of 7 Attachment 1 to Report PUB-016-24 Council Policy Clar*wji If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 3. Scope: 3.1. This policy is applicable to all staff responsible for managing the Civic Recognition and Dedication Program (as defined herein), as well as all staff responsible for educating the public with respect to Municipal services. 4. Definitions: 4.1. Applicants means all individuals or organizations applying for a Recognition or Dedication Program identified herein. 4.2. Civic Recognition and Dedication Program means the identified forms of recognition and dedication set out by the Municipality in this Policy to recognize an individual or organization's achievements or their contributions to the community (collectively, the "Civic Recognition and Dedication Program"). 5. Civic Recognition and Dedication Program: It has been established that the Municipality identifies the following forms of recognition and dedication as the Civic Recognition and Dedication Program: 5.1. Congratulatory Certificates 5.1.1. By request, the Mayor provides Clarington residents certificates for achieving milestone anniversaries and birthdays. Residents can request birthday certificates starting at 50 years. After the age of 50, birthday certificates can be requested in 10-year increments. 5.1.2. By request, the Mayor provides anniversary certificates for anniversaries beginning at 25 years and 5-year increments thereafter. 5.1.3. The Mayor has the discretion to issue a congratulatory certificate outside the specified increments upon receiving a special request. The Mayor or Council may issue a congratulatory certificate to a Clarington resident, business or organization in a manner of their choosing, such as during a council meeting, by mail or in person. Page 2 of 7 Page 99 Attachment 1 to Report PUB-016-24 Council Policy Clar*wn If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 5.2. Proclamations 5.2.1. The Mayor accepts requests for proclamations in writing from groups or organizations wishing to raise awareness or highlight an upcoming event or issue. 5.2.2. Proclamations are approved by, and issued by the Mayor, or in the absence of the Mayor, the Deputy Mayor, in the form of a letter to recognize the efforts and contribution of groups or individuals. The Mayor may issue a flag raising or Municipal Administrative lighting in conjunction with a written proclamation. 5.2.3. Written requests must be submitted at least three weeks prior to the preferred proclamation period. 5.2.4. The Mayor has the authority to designate a specific date, week or month to help raise awareness of events, arts, cultural celebrations, charitable fundraising or public awareness campaigns significant to the Municipality of Clarington. Proclamation dates are not exclusive, multiple proclamations can be issued for the same date. 5.2.5. Proclamations are not issued for: a) matters of political controversy, religious beliefs or individual conviction. b) events or organization with no direct relationship to the Municipality of Clarington. c) campaigns or events contrary to law, Municipal policies or by-laws. d) campaigns intended for profit -making purposes. 5.3. Heritage Milestone Recognition 5.3.1. Funding for approved heritage milestones and community anniversaries is managed through the Community Funding Program. Page 3 of 7 Page100 Attachment 1 to Report PUB-016-24 Council Policy Clar*wji If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 5.4.2 Heritage Milestone funding for celebrations is available up to a maximum of $5,000 for: a) non-Profit/Volunteer Community Groups celebrating 50 years in operation and in increments of 25 years; and b) local Heritage Buildings (Non -Profit based) celebrating 100 years and in increments of 25 years. 5.4. Civic Recognition Awards 5.4.1. Staff will maintain a Civic Recognition Award program. 5.4.2. The Civic Recognition Awards program will celebrate the Municipality's diverse community, and will recognize residents of Clarington for exceptional volunteerism, contribution to the community, athletic achievement and other relevant categories. 5.5. Displaying Flags and Illuminating the Municipal Administrative Centre 5.5.1. Flags and flag raisings may be approved by the Mayor. 5.5.2. Flags may be flown at half-mast as a sign of mourning. 5.5.3. With Mayor approval, the Municipality will raise a flag or organization banner at the Municipal Administrative Centre as a "guest flagpole" for non-profit and/or charitable organizations. a) recognition of national or international dignitaries visiting the Municipality. b) public awareness campaigns. 5.5.4 Flag displays and illumination requests will not be considered for the reasons stipulated in section 5.2.5. 5.6. Tree and Bench Dedication Program Page 4 of 7 Page 101 Attachment 1 to Report PUB-016-24 Council Policy Clar*wn If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 5.6.1 The Tree and Bench Dedication program allows individuals, organizations or corporations to purchase a tree, park bench and/or commemorative plaque for: a) organization, groups and charities that significant contributions to public service, charitable works or volunteering that serves Clarington. b) past Clarington residents who are deceased. c) persons who are deceased and were non-residents, but made a significant contribution to public service, charitable works or volunteering in Clarington. d) past Clarington residents or non-residents, who are deceased and have performed a heroic act in service of others in Clarington. 5.6.2 Commemorative pieces may be installed in parks and cemeteries owned by the Municipality of Clarington. It does not apply to lands not owned or not operated by the Municipality. 5.6.3 Applicants have their choice to purchase one of the following commemorative pieces: a) installation of a bench with an inscribed plaque visible on the bench back. b) planting of a juvenile tree with an inscribed plaque that sits adjacent to the tree and flush to the ground. c) placement of a plaque at an existing juvenile tree that is flush to the ground. 5.6.4 Applicants pay the full cost of the memorial piece of choice before installation. 5.6.5 The purchase is considered a donation under the Donation Receipting Management Directive. Applicants will be issued a donation receipt after payment is received in full. Page 5 of 7 Page102 Attachment 1 to Report PUB-016-24 Council Policy Clar*wn If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 5.7. Street Naming Program 5.7.1. Street names will proceed in conjunction with the Planning and Infrastructure Department registry and street naming process and are completed on an ad - hoc basis recognized by Council through a resolution. 5.7.2. The Municipality will recognize war dead and war veterans with a street blade sign with a poppy, within plans of subdivision. Priority will be given to soldiers killed at war or missing in action, as well as war veterans that have died. 5.7.3. Street names for purposes of recognizing "Members of Council" applies to past or present Mayors and follows the Planning and Infrastructure Department registry and street naming process. 6. Roles and Responsibilities: 6.1. Council is responsible for: 6.1.1. Adopting, reviewing and amending this Policy as appropriate. 6.2. Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) is responsible for: 6.2.1. Ensuring staff compliance with this Policy. 6.3. Directors / Managers are responsible for the following within their scope of authority: 6.4. Ensuring that any program identified herein, for which they are responsible, is monitored by a Management Directive. 6.5. All Staff are responsible for: 6.5.1. Following this policy. 7. Related Documents: 7.1. User Fee Bylaw Page 6 of 7 Page103 Attachment 1 to Report PUB-016-24 Council Policy CiaFIR4011 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 7.2. MD-015 Donation Receiptinq 7.3. Inquiries: 7.3.1. Public Works Services, Manager of Parks Services 7.3.2. Community Services, Director 7.3.3. Planning and Infrastructure, Manager of Development Review 8. Revision History: Date Description of Changes Approved By Page 7 of 7 Page104 Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: PUB-017-24 Authored by: Natalie Ratnasingam, Climate Change Response Coordinator Submitted By: Lee -Ann Reck, Deputy CAO, Public Services Reviewed By: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: Resolution Number: File Number: Report Subject: Support for Climate -Ready Plans and Processes Grant Program Recommendations: 1. That Report PUB-017-24, and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That Council direct and support Staff to apply for the funding opportunity from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' Local Leadership for Climate Action initiative to support the development of a Community Climate Adaptation Plan; 3. That all interested parties listed in Report PUB-017-24, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page105 Municipality of Clarington Report PUB-017-24 Report Overview Page 2 The Federation of Canadian Municipalities' Green Municipal Fund (GMF) has announced a new funding opportunity under their Local Leadership for Climate Adaptation (LLCA) initiative. Staff are preparing an application to support the creation of a Community Climate Adaptation Plan that will identify climate risks and vulnerabilities in the community, set adaptation goals and objectives, develop actions, and create a strategy to monitor and review progress. By developing a Community Climate Adaptation Plan, our community will have a clear roadmap to address climate change and ensure that all residents —especially those who are equity -deserving, benefit from a more resilient and sustainable future. 1. Background 1.1 The Municipality of Clarington plays an important role in responding to climate change by instituting policies, programs, and services to enable broader community -wide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions, as well as improve resilience to extreme weather caused by a changing climate. 1.2 The Green Municipal Fund (GMF), a program of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), is a globally unique organization providing funding and education to municipalities to help them reach net -zero and build resilient communities, while also delivering economic and social benefits. GMF manages approximately $2.4 billion in programs funded by the Government of Canada. 1.3 GMF has announced a new funding opportunity under the Local Leadership for Climate Adaptation (LLCA) initiative, "Climate -Ready Plans and Processes" to support communities adapt to the impacts of climate change by developing climate risk assessments and adaptation plans, which are critical for safeguarding infrastructure, protecting essential services, and ensuring the well-being of residents. 2. Project Proposal and Next Steps Proposed Project 2.1 An application is being prepared to support the development of a Community Climate Adaptation Plan. The Plan will help support our community in adapting to the impacts of climate change in a comprehensive and equitable manner. Page106 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report PUB-017-24 2.2 A climate risk assessment will identify community -specific hazards (e.g., flooding, wildfires, extreme heat, etc.) and assess vulnerable infrastructure and services to provide a data -based foundation for informed and proactive decision -making. 2.3 The results of the climate risk assessment will be used to develop the Climate Adaptation Plan that will help prioritize adaptation measures, integrate resiliency into existing plans, and enhance overall community resilience. This would supplement the current Corporate Climate Action plan which focuses on internal, corporate initiatives, while this Plan will develop community -based actions. 2.4 Through an inclusive engagement strategy, equity -deserving groups will be identified to address potential barriers to engagement and reach diverse groups in the community. This will help build broad support by ensuring all residents have been represented. Next Steps 2.5 The application is due November 29, 2024. A Council Resolution in support of the Project and application is required. Once the application is complete with supporting documents, it is submitted through the FCM funding portal. 2.6 A GMF Project Officer will review the application for completeness and will evaluate the submission against specific criteria. GMF will assess applications on the merits of the project budget and workplan, including whether the project has an inclusive engagement strategy, collaborative aspects, and the overall project scope. 2.7 If successful, the Project will be supported through a grant. The base grant cost share for this program is 60% and can be increased based on certain strategic priorities such as meaningfully addressing Reconciliation and/or anti -racism, equity and inclusion, or involving other levels of government. 3. Financial Considerations 3.1 The Municipality's portion of the Project will be funded from the Climate Change Professional Fees Account. 4. Strategic Plan G.4.2 — Be a leader in anticipating and addressing the impacts of climate change. 5. Climate Change 5.1 The Project will support the Corporate Climate Action Plan by building on the action items identified and further investigating opportunities to improve Clarington's resilience Page107 Municipality of Clarington Report PUB-017-24 Page 4 to extreme weather and climate change impacts through increased local adaptive capacity and collaboration among community stakeholders. 6. Concurrence Not Applicable. 7. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that Council direct and support staff to apply for the funding opportunity from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' Local Leadership for Climate Action initiative for a Community Climate Adaptation Plan. Staff Contact: Natalie Ratnasingam, Climate Change Response Coordinator, 905-623-3379 x. 2429 or nratnasingam@clarington.net. Attachments: Not Applicable Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page108 Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: PDS-047-24 Authored by: Andrei Micu, Manager, Parks Design & Development Submitted By: Darryl Lyons, Deputy CAO, Planning and Development Services Reviewed By: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: Resolution Number: File Number: Report Subject: North Bowmanville Dog Park Update Recommendation: 1. That Report PDS-047-24, and any related delegations or communication items, be received for information; 2. That Council direct staff to seek alternative Municipally owned locations for the development of a dog park in north Bowmanville and report back with options in Q1 2025; and, 3. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-047-24 and any delegations be advised of Council's decisions. Page109 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-047-24 Report Overview Page 2 The Municipality issued an assignment to complete a geotechnical investigation and excess soils characterization in preparation for development of a new dog park located on the former and closed Jackman Road Landfill Site. Poor initial results and assessments necessitated additional soils characterization tests and a Screening Level Risk Assessment to determine the feasibility of a dog park on the former landfill. Upon assessment of the findings, associated risks, and remedial options, staff are proposing to seek an alternate location for the development of a new dog park in north Bowmanville, while considering the recommendations set in the Parks, Recreation, and Culture Master Plan. 1. Background 1.1 At the Regular General Government Committee meeting held Monday, October 19, 2020, Council passed resolution #GG-373-20. This resolution requested that staff report back at the November 9, 2020, General Government Committee meeting with an estimated cost to include a new off -leash dog park in North Bowmanville for the 2021 budget. 1.2 At the November 2, 2020, Council meeting, resolutions C-438-20 to C-440-20, as amended, were introduced. These resolutions referred the costing for the new off -leash dog park directly to the 2021 budget. 1.3 At the January 4, 2021, General Government Committee meeting, Council received a memo for information intended to provide Council with background regarding the development of a new off -leash dog park in North Bowmanville. The memo including a review of 3 preferred sites noted in resolution #GG-737-20, as well as two alternate locations. 2. Discussion 2.1 In 2023, staff began detailed design for a new dog park on the identified alternate site on Longworth Avenue, west of Bowmanville Creek, under Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority ownership. The design included a 6,100m2 dog park including a 1,000m2 small dog area, and 40 space parking lot. The location and proposed use were supported by Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority; however, no formal lease agreement was reached. The site remains in full ownership to Central Lake Ontario Authority. Page110 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report PDS-047-24 2.2 As part of the detailed design work, staff issued an assignment to complete a geotechnical investigation and excess soils characterization focused on the parking lot. Poor initial test results necessitated a scope expansion for additional soils characterization tests and a screening level risk assessment to confirm the original findings and determine the feasibility and constructability of a dog park on the former land fill. These plans and reports are crucial in the design stage as they provide detailed site analysis required for design decisions and constructability. The purpose of each report is noted below: a. The geotechnical investigation provided information about the subsurface conditions, and construction engineering recommendations. The geotechnical investigation report is attached as Attachment # 1. b. The excess soils characterization analyzed and assessed the environmental quality of surplus soils that would be generated during construction, and how to properly address them under O. Reg 406/19, commonly referred to as the Soil Rules. The excess soils characterization report is attached as Attachment # 2. c. The screening level risk assessment evaluated the potential adverse effects associated with exposure to identified on -site contaminants of concern in soils for both human health and the environment. The screening level risk assessment report is attached at Attachment # 3. The reports are attached in draft status and will be finalized pending direction from staff to the consultant. Excess soils characterization 2.3 It is estimated that approximately 800m3 of excess soil will be generated from the footprint of the proposed parking lot. Based on the found contaminants of concern, the soil is not acceptable for reuse at the project site or off -site and must be disposed at a Iicenced waste disposal facility. Screening level risk assessment 2.4 It is identified that disturbance and exposure to the contaminates of concern pose potential unacceptable risk for humans and the environment. Consequentially, the report recommends a cap cover system across the site. The objective of the cap system is to provide a physical barrier that reduces the potential for exposure. The fill cap consists of minimum 0.5 metres of unimpacted fill cover, raising the overall topography of the site. It should be noted that this site partially within Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority regulated floodplain where fill is generally not supported. Page111 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PDS-047-24 Alignment with the Parks, Recreation, and Culture Master Plan 2.5 In March 2024, a Community Engagement Summary Report was published as part of the overall development of the Parks, Recreation, and Culture Master Plan. The Community Engagement Summary Report identified dog walking (on or off leash) as a top user participation activity, scoring 11 t" out of 38 drivers (Refer to Attachment # 4). The Summary report also gauged support for additional public investment in outdoor amenities. In this driver, off -leash dog parks scored poorly, 35t" out of 41 drivers (Refer to Attachment # 5). The high user participation but low desire for additional public investment indicates the public is currently satisfied with the existing amenities. 2.6 After assessing the Community Engagement Summary Report, current supply, and market conditions, The Parks, Recreation, and Culture Master Plan recommends enhancing the distribution of leash -free dog parks. The Master Plan also recommends that should it be confirmed that the Longworth Avenue site not be suitable for an off - leash dog park, and that other sites should be evaluated based on the following site selection criteria: a. Located on Municipal property. b. Minimum area of 5'000m2. c. Accessible to the public year-round. d. Located on flat land with suitable soil quality, adequate drainage and devoid of environmentally sensitive areas and other geotechnical hazards. e. Should not be located along the waterfront. f. Set back from adjacent land uses from 15m to 50m. g. Include on -site parking. 3. Financial Considerations 3.1 In 2021, Council approved $230,000 for the development of a new dog park at a location to be determined. This budget did not include lighting. 3.2 The total cost of consulting services incurred to date is $34,466.11 net HST. No further consulting fees are expected. Page112 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-047-24 Page 5 3.3 To effectively implement the recommendations outlined in the excess soil characterisation report and screening -level risk assessment, an additional funding estimate of $350,000.00 is required to supplement the remaining approved budget. Staff do not recommend pursuing this additional funding and would rather seek a more cost- effective location. 4. Strategic Plan 4.1 This project does not tie into and there is no relationship to the Strategic Plan. 5. Climate Change 5.1 Not Applicable. 6. Concurrence Not Applicable. 7. Conclusion It is recommended that staff be directed to seek an alternate, more cost effective, Municipally owned site that has less risk to humans, animals, and the environment. This approach aligns with the recommendations of the Parks, Recreation, and Culture Master Plan, and would be financially responsible. Staff Contact: Andrei Micu, Manager, Park Design and Development, 905-623-3379 ext. 2439, amicu@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Geotechnical Investigation Report Attachment 2 — Excess Soils Characterization Report Attachment 3 — Screening Level Risk Assessment Report Attachment 4 — Community Engagement Summary Report: User Participation Attachment 5 — Community Engagement Summary Report: Support for additional Public Investment. Interested Parties: Sean Reynolds Page113 Attachment 1 to PDS-047-24 CAMBIUM CAMBIUM INC. 866.217.7900 cambium-inc.com Geotechnical Investigation Report Bowmanville Dog December 21, 2023 Prepared for: Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 Page114 � r CAMBIUM Geotechnical Investigation Report — North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................1 2.0 Methodology.....................................................................................................2 2.1 Field Investigation.......................................................................................................2 2.2 Physical Laboratory Testing........................................................................................ 2 2.3 Chemical Laboratory Testing....................................................................................... 3 3.0 Subsurface Conditions....................................................................................4 3.1 Topsoil.........................................................................................................................4 3.2 Coarse Grained Fill.....................................................................................................4 3.3 Earth Fill......................................................................................................................5 3.4 Silty Sand.................................................................................................................... 5 3.5 Groundwater................................................................................................................5 4.0 Geotechnical Considerations..........................................................................6 4.1 General Site Preparation............................................................................................. 6 4.2 Excavations................................................................................................................. 6 4.3 Backfill and Compaction.............................................................................................. 6 4.4 Pavement Structure.....................................................................................................7 4.5 Design Review and Inspections..................................................................................8 5.0 Closing..............................................................................................................9 6.0 Standard Limitations..................................................................................... 10 Cambium Inc. Page i i b Page i CAMBIUM Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 List of Embedded Tables Table 1 Particle Size Distribution Analysis — Coarse Grained Fill......................................4 Table 2 Particle Size Distribution Analysis — Silty Sand ..................................................... 5 Table 3 Granular Pavement Structure............................................................................... 7 List of Appended Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Test Pit Location Plan List of Appendices Appendix A Test Pit Logs Appendix B Physical Laboratory Testing Results Cambium Inc. Page i i b Page ii CAMBIUM 1.0 Introduction Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 Cambium Inc. (Cambium) was retained by Municipality of Clarington (Client) to complete a geotechnical investigation for the proposed dog park construction and gravel parking lot to be constructed on the lot located approximately 340 m east of Bowmanville Avenue and Longworth Avenue in Bowmanville Ontario. The purpose of the geotechnical investigation was to obtain information about the subsurface conditions by means of several test pits and based on the findings provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for the construction, with reference to Municipality of Clarington standards. Cambium Inc. Page i i / Page 1 CAMBIUM 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Field Investigation Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 Cambium completed a field investigation at the Site on November 27, 2023. A total of three test pits, denoted as TP101-23 through TP103-23, were advanced into the subsurface at predetermined locations throughout the Site to depths of 0.5 to 1.0 m below ground surface (mbgs). A Site Location Map and Test Pit location plan are appended as Figure 1 and Figure 2 of this report. The soils at each test location were subjected to Dynamic Cone Penetration Testing (DCPT) using a WILDCAT dynamic cone penetrometer. DCPT consists of recording the number of blows required to drive a cone of 10 centimeters squared project area into the soil 100 mm with a 16 kg hammer falling 380 mm. The DCPT values were corrected to equivalent Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N values as per ASTM D4633 and used to assess the consistency of cohesive soils and the relative density of non -cohesive soils. Sampling was completed using a hand auger to 0.6 m in each hole. Soil samples were collected at each change in stratigraphy. The encountered soil units were logged in the field using visual and tactile methods, and samples were placed in labelled plastic bags for transport, future reference, possible laboratory testing, and storage. Test pit logs are provided in Appendix A. Site soil and groundwater conditions are described, and geotechnical recommendations are discussed in the following sections of this report. 2.2 Physical Laboratory Testing Physical laboratory testing, including two particle size distribution analyses (LS-702,705), was completed on selected soil samples to confirm textural classification and to assess geotechnical parameters. Moisture content testing was completed on all soil samples. Testing results are presented in Appendix B and are discussed in Section 3.0. Cambium Inc. Page i i b Page 2 CAMBIUM 2.3 Chemical Laboratory Testing Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 Representative samples collected from the investigation were returned to our laboratory for detailed visual examination. Selected soil samples were submitted for chemical analysis for preliminary excess soil characterization. Results of the excess soil characterization are outlined under a separate cover. Cambium Inc. Page i i u Page 3 CAMBIUM 3.0 Subsurface Conditions Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 The detailed soil profiles encountered in the test pits are indicated on the attached test pit logs in Appendix A. It should be noted that the conditions indicated on the test pit logs are for specific locations only and can vary between and beyond the test locations. 3.1 Topsoil A layer of topsoil was observed at the surface in each of the test pits. The topsoil ranged in thickness from 125 to 150 mm. The topsoil was dark brown in colour and contained some organic inclusions. Analysis of the organic content of the topsoil was not included in this scope of work. 3.2 Coarse Grained Fill Granular fill material was observed underlying the topsoil in TP101-23 and extending to termination depth of 0.6 mbgs. From approximately 0.15 to 0.4 mbgs, the fill was described as sand and gravel. From 0.4 to 0.6 mbgs, the fill was described as a non -cohesive gravelly sand fill. The fill in this test pit appears to be old imported granular fill material. All fill material in this hole was brown in colour and described as moist at the time of the investigation. Corrected SPT N values in the fill material ranged from 19 to 29 indicating a compact relative density. A laboratory particle size distribution analysis was completed for one sample of the sand and gravel to gravelly sand fill material. The analysis results are summarized in Table 1 with details provided in Appendix B. Table 1 Particle Size Distribution Analysis — Coarse Grained Fill Test Pit and Depth Soil % % % % % Moisture Sample (mbgs) Gravel Sand Silt Clay Content TP101-23 SS3 0.4-0.6 Gravelly Sand trace Silt 25 65 7 3 3.8 Trace Clay Based on the laboratory analyses, the existing coarse grained fill material does not meet the gradation requirements for OPSS1010 Granular A Type material. The material generally Cambium Inc. Page i zu Page 4 CAMBIUM Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 complies with Granular B gradation requirements, with slightly elevated percentage of fine material. 3.3 Earth Fill In test pit 131-1102-23 a sandy silt fill soil was observed underlying the topsoil layer and extending to termination depth at 0.6 mbgs. The sandy silt was brown in colour and described as moist at the time of the investigation. The sandy silt fill appeared to be reworked native soil containing trace construction debris. Corrected SPT N values in the earth fill range from 10 to greater than 50, increasing with depth, which indicates a compact to very dense relative density. 3.4 Silty Sand In test pit BH103-23 a native silty sand soil was observed underlying the topsoil layer and extending to termination depth at 0.6 mbgs. The silty sand was brown in colour and described as moist at the time of the investigation. The sandy silt contained some gravel and clay. Corrected SPT N values in the sandy silt range from 16 to greater than 50, increasing with depth, which indicates a compact to very dense relative density. A laboratory particle size distribution analysis was completed for one sample of the silty sand material. The analysis results are summarized in Table 2 with details provided in Appendix B. Table 2 Particle Size Distribution Analysis — Silty Sand Test Pit and Depth Soil % % % % % Moisture Sample (mbgs) Gravel Sand Silt Clay Content BH103-23 SS2 0.2 — 0.6 Silty Sand some Clay 10 45 32 13 8.5 some Gravel 3.5 Groundwater Test pits were checked for standing water upon completion of sampling. No standing water or wet to saturated soils were observed in the course of this investigation. Soils were typically brown in colour within testing depth. It should be noted that groundwater levels at the site may fluctuate seasonally and in response to climatic events. Cambium Inc. Page i z i Page 5 CAMBIUM 4.0 Geotechnical Considerations Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 The following recommendations are based on the test pit information and are intended to assist the client and its designer. Recommendations should not be construed as providing instructions to contractors, who should form their own opinions about site conditions. It is possible that subsurface conditions beyond the test locations may vary from those observed. If significant variations are found before or during construction, Cambium should be contacted so that we can reassess our findings, if necessary. 4.1 General Site Preparation All topsoil, organics, loose earth fill and deleterious material should be removed from below the development areas prior to construction. For site grading, in areas of cut or minor fill where the proof roll and/ or inspection has identified unsuitable subgrade conditions, whether too soft or too wet, material is to be removed and replaced with an approved OPSS 1010 Granular `B' Type I compacted material, under guidance of Geotechnical Engineer. 4.2 Excavations Temporary excavations must be carried out in accordance with the latest edition of the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA). The soils at this site would generally be classified as Type 3 soils in accordance with OHSA, with unsupported side slopes no steeper than 1 H:1 V to the bottom of the excavation. Excavation side slopes should be protected from exposure to precipitation and associated ground surface runoff and should be inspected regularly for signs of instability. If localized instability is noted during excavations or if wet conditions are encountered, the side slopes should be flattened as required to maintain safe working conditions. 4.3 Backfill and Compaction Excavated non -organic native silty sand to sandy silt materials from the site may be appropriate for use as fill below grading and parking areas, provided that the actual or adjusted moisture content at the time of construction is within a range that permits compaction to Cambium Inc. Page i zz Page 6 CAMBIUM Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 required densities. Some moisture content adjustments may be required depending on seasonal conditions. It should be noted that the on -site materials should be re -used only where non -free draining fill is required. Engineered fill for foundations should consist of free -draining granular material meeting the specifications of OPSS 1010 Granular B or an approved equivalent and should be placed in maximum 300 mm thick lifts compacted to a minimum 98% SPMDD as confirmed by nuclear densometer testing. 4.4 Pavement Structure It is understood that the construction will include a gravel driveway and gravel parking lot for the proposed dog park. The recommended granular pavement structure design has been developed for two (2) traffic loading scenarios, Medium -duty, and heavy-duty. The heavy-duty design is appropriate for areas if heavy trucks and maintenance vehicles are anticipated to drive, while the medium duty design is appropriate for areas where no heavy traffic is anticipated. The recommended pavement structure is provided in Table 3. Table 3 Granular Pavement Structure Pavement Layer Compaction Heavy Duty Medium Duty Requirements Granular Base 100% SPMDD 200 mm OPSS 1010 200 mm OPSS 1010 Granular A Granular A Granular Subbase 98% SPMDD 400 mm OPSS 1010 300 mm OPSS 1010 Granular B Granular B The subgrade should be compacted, proof rolled and inspected by a Geotechnical Engineer. Any areas where rutting or appreciable deflection is noted should be sub -excavated and replaced with suitable fill. The fill should be compacted to at least 98% SPMDD. The thickness of the granular layer could be increased at the discretion of the engineer, to accommodate site conditions at the time of construction, including soft or weak subgrade soil replacement. Cambium Inc. Page i L.i Page 7 CAMBIUM 4.5 Design Review and Inspections Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 Cambium should be provided the opportunity to review the design drawings, prior to next stage of tendering and construction, to ensure that all pertinent geotechnical-related factors have been addressed. Cambium should also be retained to complete testing and inspections during construction operations to examine and approve subgrade conditions, placement, and compaction of fill materials. Cambium Inc. Page 124 Page 8 CAMBIUM 5.0 Closing Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 Please note that this report is governed by the attached qualifications and limitations. If you have questions or comments regarding this document, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Cambium Inc. Kelly Lewis, P.Eng. Zhaochang Luo, M.Eng., P.Eng. Project Coordinator - Geotechnical Senior Project Manager - Geotechnical Ilcambiumincstorage.file. core. windows. netlproiects119100 to 19199119181-001 Municipality of Clarington - GEO - North Bowmanville Dog ParkOeliverableslREPORT - GEOIDraft12023-12-21 GEO RPT North Bowmanville Dog Park.docx Cambium Inc. Page i Lb Page 9 � r CAMBIUM 6.0 Standard Limitations Limited Warranty Geotechnical Investigation Report — North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December21, 2023 In performing work on behalf of a client, Cambium relies on its client to provide instructions on the scope of its retainer and, on that basis, Cambium determines the precise nature of the work to be performed. Cambium undertakes all work in accordance with applicable accepted industry practices and standards. Unless required under local laws, other than as expressly stated herein, no other warranties or conditions, either expressed or implied, are made regarding the services, work or reports provided. Reliance on Materials and Information The findings and results presented in reports prepared by Cambium are based on the materials and information provided by the client to Cambium and on the facts, conditions and circumstances encountered by Cambium during the performance of the work requested by the client. In formulating its findings and results into a report, Cambium assumes that the information and materials provided by the client or obtained by Cambium from the client or otherwise are factual, accurate and represent a true depiction of the circumstances that exist. Cambium relies on its client to inform Cambium if there are changes to any such information and materials. Cambium does not review, analyze or attempt to verify the accuracy or completeness of the information or materials provided, or circumstances encountered, other than in accordance with applicable accepted industry practice. Cambium will not be responsible for matters arising from incomplete, incorrect or misleading information or from facts or circumstances that are not fully disclosed to or that are concealed from Cambium during the provision of services, work or reports. Facts, conditions, information and circumstances may vary with time and locations and Cambium's work is based on a review of such matters as they existed at the particular time and location indicated in its reports. No assurance is made by Cambium that the facts, conditions, information, circumstances or any underlying assumptions made by Cambium in connection with the work performed will not change after the work is completed and a report is submitted. If any such changes occur or additional information is obtained, Cambium should be advised and requested to consider if the changes or additional information affect its findings or results. When preparing reports, Cambium considers applicable legislation, regulations, governmental guidelines and policies to the extent they are within its knowledge, but Cambium is not qualified to advise with respect to legal matters. The presentation of information regarding applicable legislation, regulations, governmental guidelines and policies is for information only and is not intended to and should not be interpreted as constituting a legal opinion concerning the work completed or conditions outlined in a report. All legal matters should be reviewed and considered by an appropriately qualified legal practitioner. Site Assessments A site assessment is created using data and information collected during the investigation of a site and based on conditions encountered at the time and particular locations at which fieldwork is conducted. The information, sample results and data collected represent the conditions only at the specific times at which and at those specific locations from which the information, samples and data were obtained and the information, sample results and data may vary at other locations and times. To the extent that Cambium's work or report considers any locations or times other than those from which information, sample results and data was specifically received, the work or report is based on a reasonable extrapolation from such information, sample results and data but the actual conditions encountered may vary from those extrapolations. Only conditions at the site and locations chosen for study by the client are evaluated; no adjacent or other properties are evaluated unless specifically requested by the client. Any physical or other aspects of the site chosen for study by the client, or any other matter not specifically addressed in a report prepared by Cambium, are beyond the scope of the work performed by Cambium and such matters have not been investigated or addressed. Reliance Cambium's services, work and reports may be relied on by the client and its corporate directors and officers, employees, and professional advisors. Cambium is not responsible for the use of its work or reports by any other party, or for the reliance on, or for any decision which is made by any party using the services or work performed by or a report prepared by Cambium without Cambium's express written consent. Any party that relies on services or work performed by Cambium or a report prepared by Cambium without Cambium's express written consent, does so at its own risk. No report of Cambium may be disclosed or referred to in any public document without Cambium's express prior written consent. Cambium specifically disclaims any liability or responsibility to any such party for any loss, damage, expense, fine, penalty or other such thing which may arise or result from the use of any information, recommendation or other matter arising from the services, work or reports provided by Cambium. Limitation of Liability Potential liability to the client arising out of the report is limited to the amount of Cambium's professional liability insurance coverage. Cambium shall only be liable for direct damages to the extent caused by Cambium's negligence and/or breach of contract. Cambium shall not be liable for consequential damages. Personal Liabilitv The client expressly agrees that Cambium employees shall have no personal liability to the client with respect to a claim, whether in contract, tort and/or other cause of action in law. Furthermore, the client agrees that it will bring no proceedings nor take any action in any court of law against Cambium employees in their personal capacity. Cambium Inc. Page i "Lb Page 10 CAMBIUM Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 Appended Figures Cambium Inc. Page 0 128 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Longworth Avenue Bowmanville, Ontario LEGEND Highway Major Road Minor Road —� Railway Water Area Watercourse First Nations Reserve Provincial Park Wooded Area Built Up Area Notes: -This document contains information licensed under the Open Govemment License - Ontario. - Distances on this plan are in metres and can be converted to feet by dividing by 0.3048. - Cambium Inc. makes every effort to ensure this map is free from errors but nnol be held responsible for any damages due to error or omissions. This map should not be used for navigation or legal purposes. It is intended for general reference use only. 0194 Sophia Street Peterborough, Ontario, K91-1 1 E5 �_ r Tel: (705) 742.7900 Fax: (705) 742.7907 ww—nnbiunn-inc.cant CAMBIUM SITE LOCATION PLAN Project No.: uate: December 2023 19181-001 Rev.: Scale: Projection: 1:100,000 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N Created by: by: Figure: DBBChecked KL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION - MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON " Longworth Avenue Bowmanville, Ontario LEGEND Test Pit TP103-23 TP102-23 4 Notes: his document contains information licensed under the Open Govemmenl Ontario. GLicense - - Distances on.3 this plan are in metres and can be converted to feet by di048. viding by 0nc. ma this map is free from Cambium Inc. makes every effort to but - ensure enom cannot be held responsible for any damages due to enor omissions. This It map should notfor navigation or legal purposes. It pis intended for general referencee uses. only. TP101-23 W c� 194 Sophia Street a _ = Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 1 H Tel: (705) 742.7900 Fax: (705) 742.7907 ,a www.cambium-inc.com i CAMBIUM PJ�NJ� pRjN o TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN m �P Project No.: Date: December 2023 19181-001 Rev.: Projection: yScale: 0 4 8 12 16 20 1:750 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N x Created by: Checked by I Figure: w in � o DBB KL CAMBIUM Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 Appendix A Test Pit Logs Cambium Inc. Page Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Borehole: TP101-23 Contractor: Method: DCPT Testing Page: 1 Of 1 Z r Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 116.75 mASL Date CompletedNovember 27, 2023 CAMBIUM Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865869 E: 684435 Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLO Shear Strength Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa n V. PI ra V. 21 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 % Moisture — SPT (N) O > Q OT 0 E n U Z F Well w o J Description o�01>� z o Installation Log Notes Depth can 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 116.8 0 6 15 TOPSOIL: —150 mm thick 1 DCPT 15 • 2 DCPT 19 116.6 19 • 0.15 FILL: (SP/GP) SAND and GRAVEL; brown (FILL); 4 6% 19 ® 1' Testpit open and dry 3 DCPT 19 4 DCPT 17 x/ / non -cohesive, moist, compact P ns.a� p upon completion of P P as, ,7 testing. jj/// FILL: (SP) Gravelly SAND, 0.38 trace silt, trace clay; brown 5 — DCPT 17 116.2 0.5 0 6 DCPT 12 /j%/ (FILL);non-cohesive, moist, compact to dense 116.14 ,z 1L 061 1 DCPT 12 O Borehole terminated @ 0.6 mbgs ,> 8 DCPT 12 due to SPT refusal encountered. 9 DCPT 22 ©`. 115.8 1 O,-, 10 DCPT 29 115.2 1.5 114.8 2 114.2 2.5 113.8 3 113.2 3.5 112.8 GRAINSIZE LE EL D SILT CLAY 1 m = 46 units DISTRIBUTION 7 3 Logged By: EC Input By: EC Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Ottawa Page 131 Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Borehole: TP102-23 Contractor: Method: DCPT Testing Page: 1 of 1 Z r Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 117.25 mASL Date CompletedNovember 27, 2023 CAMBIUM Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865909 E: 684430 Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLO Shear Strength Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa PI n V. ra V. 21 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 % Moisture — SPT (N) O ' OT 0 E 4) U Z F Well w o J Description Elevation z o Installation Log Notes Depth can 25 50 75 20406080 117.2 0 24.5% 7 TOPSOIL: -130 mm thick 1n.1z 1 DCPT 7 • 13.3% 10 • 13 jjjjj // jj . 0.13 FILL: (ML) Sandy SILT; brown 2 DCPT 10 3 DCPT 13 �j%j j�j /j�jjj/ (FILL), trace debris; • • non -cohesive, moist. compact to dense 16 • 4 DCPT 16 /jjjj�/j 5 DCPT 31 116.8 0.5 //%% jjj� jj jjjj •31 63 6 DCPT 63 j* 11664 • Testpit open and dry Borehole terminated @ 0.6 mb s o.61 g upon completion of testing. due to target depth achieved. 116.2 1 115.8 1.5 115.2 2 114.8 2.5 114.2 3 113.8 3.5 113.2 GRAINSIZE I SAMPLE I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT I CLAY 1m=46.nb DISTRIBUTION Logged By: EC Input By: EC Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Ottawa Page132 Q Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Borehole: TP103-23 Contractor: Method: DCPT Testing Page: 1 of 1 Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 116.8 mASL Date CompletedNovember 27, 2023 ..... . Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865952 E: 684459 CAMBIUM Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLO!1� Shear Strength Limits (%) PLy Cu, kPa v, PI (� "t re V. 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 --- 0 0 'o z > o E (D ro of % Moisture SPT (N) Well E a w Description °eNOtb" °L T a Installation Log Notes u w o Depth z 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 116.8 0 21.9i 10 TOPSOIL: -150 mm thick 1 DCPT 10 0 • 2 DCPT 16 116.65 16 • • (SM) SILTY SAND: (SP) SILTY o 15 ai 3 38 SAND, some gravel, some clay; DCPT •3s brown; non -cohesive, moist, 41 • 4 DCPT 41 116.3 I t 0.5 ' dense 63 • Testpit open and dry 5 DCPT 63 II upon completion of 161e testing. Borehole terminated @ 0.6 mbgs o.61 due to SPT refusal encountered. 115.8t II 1 115.3t1.5 II 114.8t II 2 114.3t II 2.5 113.8t3 II 113.3t II 3.5 112.8 GRAINSIZE SAMPLE GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY 45 ne DISTRIBUTION Logged By: EC Input By: EC Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Ottawa Page133 CAMBIUM Geotechnical Investigation Report— North Bowmanville Dog Park Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 December 21, 2023 Appendix 6 Physical Laboratory Testing Results Cambium Inc. Page 4 = Grain Size Distribution Chart CAMBIUM Project Number: 19181-001 Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Sample Date: November27, 2023 Location: TP 101-23 SS 3 100 90 80 70 30 20 10 Client: Municipality of Clarington BY C�C i,L Sampled By: Emily Couperthwaite - Cambium Inc. Depth: 0.4 m to 0.6 m Lab Sample No: S-23-2062 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CLAY &SILT (<0.075 mm) SAND (<4.75 mm to 0.075 mm) GRAVEL (>4.75 mm) FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE Granular A Envelope FAME0111111 Granular B Envelope f��a�lllll 1111��■�Itilll��■III Sample 1111■■■�11111■■■� �■d�lllll ■■ 111 ■�11111■■■�11111■■■� ■■■�IIIII■■■�11111■■■�11111■■►.III �■8�11111 ■II�11111 ■■■�11111■■■�11111■■■�11111lI■�111 ■■If�lllll ■■■�11111■■■�11111■■■�111�:�■■�ICill■■■�11111 ■■�11111■■■�11111■1�■�11111■■■�l11111�■i�lllll ■■�11111■■■�11111■■■�/1111■■■rlllll■■■�11111 ■■�11111■■■�11111■..111111■■■�11111■■■�11111 ..�IIIII■■■�IIIII■■I�IIIII�■■�IIIII■i■..11111 ■■■�11111■■■�11111■■/I�1111!■■■�11111■■■�11111 ■■■�11111■■■�11111■■■�11�11■■■illllll■■■�11111 ■■■�11111■■■�11111■rl■�11111■■■�11lii■■■�11111 ■■■�11111■■■�11111■■■�11111■■■�11111■■■�11111 ■■■�11111■■■�IIII�I�■■�11111■■■�11111■■■�11111 ■■■�IIIII■■■�IIIII�■■�IIl�I■■■�IIIII■■■�11111 ■■■�Illl�w_w_�!���cil 11'II■■■�11111■■■�111 �■�i�llllr■■�111:1 111■■■�11111■■■�11� A-1 0.1 1 DIAMETER (mm) all 100 MIT SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CLAY SILT FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE ARSE MEDIUM CO ao —I. SAND GRAVEL Borehole No. Sample No. Depth Gravel Sand Silt Clay Moisture TP 101-23 SS 3 0.4 m to 0.6 m 25 65 7 3 3.8 Description Classification D60 D30 D10 C C� Gravelly Sand trace Silt trace Clay SW 0.800 0.280 0.080 10.00 1.23 Additional information available upon request Issued By: /*4wDate Issued: (Senior Project Manager) Cambium Inc. (Laboratory) 866.217.7Ragaa135rn-inc.com 194 Sophia St. I Peterborough I ON I K9H 1 E5 December 20, 2023 Form: L6V.2 - Grad.Hydo C—IFIED BY CCiL r Grain Size Distribution Chart CAMBIUM Project Number: 19181-001 Client: Municipality ofClarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Sample Date: November 27, 2023 Sampled By: Emily Couperthwaite - Cambium Inc. Location: TP 103-23 SS 2 Depth: 0.2 m to 0.6 m Lab Sample No: S-23-2063 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CLAY & SILT (<0.075 mm) SAND (<4.75 mm to 0.075 mm) GRAVEL (>4.75 mm) FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE 100 90 80 70 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 O Z Q F 0 so r z U 0 80 a 70 80 90 100 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 DIAMETER (—) MIT SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CLAY SILT FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE sou�oeas SAND GRAVEL Borehole No. Sample No. Depth Gravel Sand Silt Clay Moisture TP 103-23 SS 2 0.2 m to 0.6 m 10 45 32 13 8.5 Description Classification D60 D30 Duo C C0 Silty Sand some Clay some Gravel SM 0.195 0.021 Additional information available upon request J"P( Issued By: Date Issued: (Senior Project Manager) Cambium Inc. (Laboratory) 866.217. 7Rag aalU m-i n c. co m 194 Sophia St. I Peterborough I ON I K9H 1 E5 December 11, 2023 Form: L6V.2 - Grad.Hydo Moisture Content cER161£O6� CCiL Project Number: 19181-001 — CAMBIUM Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Client: Municipality of Clarington Date Taken: 2023-11-27 Lab Number: Date Tested: Tested By: S-23-2061 2023-12-04 K. Dickson Borehole Number Sample Number Sample Depth (m) Water Weight (g) Water Content (%) Additional Observations 101 1 0.00-0.20 7.4 6.0 N R,1 101 2 0.20-0.40 7.8 4.6 1 101 3 0.40-0.60 21.9 3.8 N R,1 102 1 0.00-0.20 45.4 24.5 N R,1 102 2 0.20-0.60 20.8 13.3 1 103 1 0.00-0.20 41.7 21.9 N R,1 103 2 0.20-0.60 87.4 8.5 N R,1 1 — Contains organics 2 — Contains rubble 3 — Hydrocarbon Odour 4 — Unknown Chemical Odour 5 — Saturated — free water visible 6 — Very moist — near optimum moisture content 7 — Moist — below optimum moisture 8 — Dry — dry texture — powdery P9g— eef all —caution may not be representative 10g Hold sample for gradation analysis Attachment 2 to PDS-047-24 August 20, 2024 Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario L1 C 3A6 CAMBIUM Attn: Andrei Micu Environmental Re: Excess Soil Characterization — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Geotechnical Bowmanville, Ontario Cambium Reference: 19181-001 Building Sciences Construction Testing & Inspections Telephone (866) 217.7900 (705) 742.7900 Facsimile (705) 742.7907 Website cambium-inc.com Mailing Address P.O. Box 325, Peterborough, Ontario Canada, K9J 6Z3 Locations Peterborough Kingston Barrie Ottawa Whitby Laboratory Peterborough Pmfe iunal Engineers Ontario Dear Mr. Micu, Cambium Inc. (Cambium) was retained by the Municipality of Clarington (Client, "the Municipality") to characterize in -situ soil at the site located approximately 340 m east of the intersection of Longworth Avenue and Bowmanville Avenue in Bowmanville, Ontario (`Project Area'; Figure 1). The Project Area is known as the Jackman Road Closed Landfill Site and the soil characterization was completed in support of the proposed construction of a dog park and gravel parking lot on the Site. It is estimated that 803 m3 of excess soil will be generated from the footprint of the proposed parking lot to an estimated depth of about 0.6 m below ground surface (mbgs). In addition, the quality of soil used to cap the former landfill was investigated in support of a screening level risk assessment (SLRA). The soil characterization involved soil sampling and analysis to assess environmental quality, including the presence of contaminants and their respective concentration relative to regulatory standards. The methodology for the excess soil characterization was based on the requirements of Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) 406/19 and the associated "Rules for Soil Management and Excess Soil Quality Standards" (Soil Rules). The methodology for testing in support of the SLRA was based on the requirements of O.Reg. 153/04. 19181-001 Page138 August 20, 2024 An Assessment of Past Uses' (APU) was completed in support of this investigation. The APU identified four potentially contaminating activities (PCAs), two on -site and two off -site, within the APU Study Area. The on -site PCAs are related to an on -site historical waste disposal site and importation of fill material CAMBIUM of unknown quality (landfill cap). The off -site PCAs were related to historical Environmental orchards. Only the on -site PCAs contributed to areas of potential environmental Geotechnical concern (APECs) in the Project Area as shown on Figure 2. The APU identified Building Sciences the following contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) for the Project Area: Construction Testing Metals, hydride -forming metals & Inspections • Petroleum hydrocarbon fractions 1 to 4 (PHC F1-F4), • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Telephone (866)217.7900 • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), (705) 742.7900 Facsimile • Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and (705) 742.7907 • And other regulated parameters (ORPs) including electrical conductivity (EC), Website cambium-inc.com sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), hot water soluble boron (HWS-B), chromium Mailing Address P.O. Box325, VI (CrVI), cyanide (CN-), mercury (Hg), and pH. Peterborough, Ontario Canada, K9J 6Z3 Methodology Locations The methodology for the soil characterization was developed by a qualified Peterborough Kingston Barrie person (QP) based on the requirements of O.Reg. 406/19 and O.Reg.153/04. Ottawa Whitby Cambium personnel conducted initial soil sampling, concurrently with the Laboratory geotechnical investigation2, on November 27, 2023, with additional sampling Peterborough completed on July 3, 2024. Cambium oversaw the advancement of three test pits on November 27, 2023 (TP101-23 to TP103-23), and nine test pits on July 3, 2024 (TP201-24 to TP209-24). Professional Engineers Ontario AIII 1 Assessment of Past Uses — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario. July 31, 2024, Cambium Inc. 2 Excess Soil Characterization — North Bowmanville Dog Park. January 5, 2024, Cambium Inc. 19181-001 Page 139 Page 2 CAMBIUM Environmental Geotechnical Building Sciences I Construction Testing & Inspections Telephone (866) 217.7900 (705) 742.7900 Facsimile (705) 742.7907 Website cambium-inc.com Mailing Address P.O. Box 325, Peterborough, Ontario Canada, K9J 6Z3 Locations Peterborough Kingston Barrie Ottawa Whitby Laboratory Peterborough Pmf-iunal Engineers 7 Ontario August 20, 2024 TP101-23 to TP103-24 were advanced within the proposed parking area to support excess soil removal and TP201-24 to TP209-24 were advanced to investigate the landfill cap quality. Refer to Figure 2 for the sampling locations, and Figure 3 for results. Each test pit was advanced to a depth of about 0.6 to 0.8 mbgs. The proposed depth of excavation that will generate excess soil is 0.6 mbgs. Soil was examined for soil type, moisture content, presence of deleterious material, odour, and visual evidence of impacts such as staining. The soil sampling program is included in Embedded Table 1 below. Embedded Table 1 Soil Sampling Program Test pit ID Depth (m) COPC analyzed TP101-23 0.2 - 0.4 PHCs, BTEX, metals, EC, SAR, pH TP102-23 0.2 - 0.6 PHCs, BTEX, metals, EC, SAR, pH TP103-23 0.2 - 0.6 PHCs, BTEX, metals, EC, SAR, pH TP201-24 0.6 - 0.8 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, metals, and ORPs TP202-24 0.5 - 0.7 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, metals, and ORPs 0.4 - 0.6 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, metals, and ORPs TP203-24 0.6 - 0.8 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, metals, and ORPs TP204-24 0.5 - 0.7 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, metals, and ORPs TP205-24 0.3 - 0.5 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, metals, and ORPs TP206-24 0.4 - 0.6 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, metals, and ORPs TP207-24 0.4 - 0.6 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, metals, and ORPs 0.2 - 0.4 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, metals, and ORPs TP208-24 0.4 - 0.6 PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, metals, and ORPs TP209-24 N/A- Results were not analyzed since exceedances were not reported at the adjacent sampling locations. One sample from TP102-24 was submitted for Reg 558 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) metals and inorganics analysis for disposal purposes. The TCLP sample was submitted from the sampling locations where 90% (or higher) of the highest contaminant concentrations were identified. The soil samples were submitted to Paracel, an accredited analytical laboratory. 19181-001 Page140 Page 3 August 20, 2024 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Results Quality control duplicate samples were analyzed as part of a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program. Blind duplicate soil samples were CAMBIUM submitted for analysis, as follows: Environmental QAQC1 is a duplicate of TP102_0.2-0.6 Geotechnical I e QAQC201 is a duplicate of TP203_0.6-0.8 Building Sciences Where analytical parameters were detected in both the parent and the duplicate Construction Testing samples at concentrations greater than five times the laboratory reported & Inspections detection limit (RDL), relative percent difference (RPD) was calculated to assess the precision of the results. RPD between was calculated as follows: Ix1— x2I Telephone RPD(%) = X 100% (866) 217.7900 xm (705) 742.7900 Facsimile Where: x1 = parent sample result (705) 742.7907 x2 = duplicate sample result Website cambium-inc.com xm = arithmetic mean of parent and duplicate sample results Mailing Address P.O. Box 325, Peterborough, Ontario RPD are generally more sensitive at low parameter concentrations; as such, Canada, K9J 6Z3 RPD is not calculated when the parameter concentration of the parent and/or Locations Peterborough duplicate sample is less than five times the laboratory RDL. Kingston Barrie Ottawa The calculated RPD results were compared to data quality objectives (DQOs) Whitby listed in the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Laboratory Properties (MECP, 2021). These DQOs are accepted by the Ministry. Peterborough All calculated RPDs met the DQOs except for PHC F4 and antimony in QAQC1 from TP102_0.2-0.6, with a calculated RPD of 77% and 100%, respectively, as well as PHC F4 and lead in QAQC201 from TP203 0.6-0.8, with a calculated RPD of 35% and 32%, respectively. The RPD exceedances could be attributed to soil heterogeneity; however, since Pmf—iunal Engineers Ontario the remaining RPDs are within the acceptable limits, and the parent and APW. duplicate sample both met or exceeded the ESQS, the elevated RPDs do not 19181-001 Page 141 Page 4 August 20, 2024 CAMBIUM Environmental Geotechnical Building Sciences Construction Testing & Inspections Telephone (866) 217.7900 (705) 742.7900 Facsimile (705) 742.7907 Website cambium-inc.com Mailing Address P.O. Box 325, Peterborough, Ontario Canada, K9J 6Z3 Locations Peterborough Kingston Barrie Ottawa Whitby Laboratory Peterborough Pmf—iunal Engineers Ontario impact interpretation of results, and results were considered acceptable and suitable for use in evaluating soil quality at the Project Area. Results No odours or staining were noted in the soil samples, except in TP204-24 from 0.4 to 0.7 mbgs, which was sampled. Deleterious material, such as brick, refuse, plastics, metal, wires, and glass, was observed starting between 0.10 mbgs and 0.3 mbgs at sampling locations TP201-24, TP203-24, TP204-24, TP206-24, TP208-24, and TP209-24, and at surface at TP207-24. Groundwater was not encountered within the test pits. Soil analysis results were compared to the volume independent Table 1, Table 2.1, and Table 3.1 excess soil quality standards (ESQS) in Appendix 1 of the Soil Rules for all property uses — agricultural and other (AO); residential, parkland, institutional (RPI), and industrial, commercial, community (ICC). The following is a summary of the excess soil quality standards that are met based on the analysis (Embedded Table 2). The full set of analyses is presented in the attached Figure 3 and Table 1. Embedded Table 2 - Excess Soil Quality Standards Met Sample ID Sample Depth (mbgs) Table 1 (AO) Table 1 (RPIICC) Table 2.1 (AO) Table 2.1 (RPI) Table 2.1 (ICC) Table 3.1 (RPI) Table 3.1 (ICC) TP101-23 0.2 — 0.4 X X ✓ TP102-23 0.2 — 0.6 X X X X X X X TP103-23 0.2 — 0.6 X X X X X X X TP201-24 0.6 — 0.8 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ TP202-24 0.5-0.7 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 0.4 — 0.6 ✓* ✓* ✓* ✓* d ✓* ✓ TP203-24 0.6-0.8 TP204-24 0.5 — 0.7 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ TP205-24 0.3 — 0.5 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 19181-001 Page142 Page 5 August 20, 2024 CAMBIUM Environmental Geotechnical Building Sciences Construction Testing & Inspections Telephone (866) 217.7900 (705) 742.7900 Facsimile (705) 742.7907 Website cambium-inc.com Mailing Address P.O. Box 325, Peterborough, Ontario Canada, K9J 6Z3 Locations Peterborough Kingston Barrie Ottawa Whitby Laboratory Peterborough Pmfe iunal Engineers Ontario Sample Table 1 Table 1 Table Table Table Table Table Sample ID Depth (AO) (RPIICC) 2.1 2.1 2.1 3.1 3.1 (mbgs) (AO) (RPI) (ICC) (RPI) (ICC) TP206-24 0.4 — 0.6 ✓ V ✓ ✓ ✓ TP207-24 0.4 — 0.6 ✓ V ✓ ✓ ✓ 0.2 — 0.4 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓V, ✓ ✓ TP208-24 0.4 — 0.6 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Jr exceeds standard ✓meets standard ✓* exceeds for SAR and/or EC only Excluding EC and SAR exceedances, the soils exceeded for the following contaminants as identified in Embedded Table 2 above: • TP101-23 exceeded one or more tables for PHC F4 from 0.2 to 0.4 mbgs; • TP102-23 exceeded one or more tables for PHCs F4, antimony, lead, and zinc from 0.2 to 0.6 mbgs; • TP103-23 exceeded one or more tables for antimony, barium, lead, and zinc from 0.2 to 0.6 mbgs; • TP203-24 exceeded one or more tables for PHC F2, F3, and F4 from 0.6 to 0.8 mbgs. The leachate results met the O.Reg. 558 Schedule 4 leachate criteria and the soil is considered non-leachate toxic for disposal purposes. The bulk soil results compared to various ESQS are provided on Figure 3, and in Figure 3 — Sample Locations Table 1. The original laboratory Certificates of Analysis for bulk soil and leachate analyses are attached, with bulk soil results compared to Table 1 RPIICC standards. SALT -IMPACTED EXCESS SOIL Salt -related contaminants, SAR and/or EC, were present in some samples at levels exceeding the standards. As noted in the Soil Rules, excess soil quality 19181-001 Page143 Page 6 August 20, 2024 standards are deemed to be met for those chemicals in soil resulting solely from the use of a substance for the safety of vehicular or pedestrian traffic applied under conditions of snow or ice or both (e.g., SAR and EC), if the salt -impacted excess soil is placed in accordance with subsection 1(3) of Section D in Part I CAMBIUM (attached). Environmental Recommendations Geotechnical Building Sciences Cambium collected 13 bulk samples and 2 QA/QC duplicates from 11 test pits advanced to depths of 0.6 to 0.8 mbgs within the Project Area. Bulk soil samples Construction Testing & Inspections were analyzed for all or some of metals, hydride -forming metals, BTEX, PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, metals and hydride -forming metals, and ORPs. One soil sample was analyzed for leachate by TCLP. Telephone (866) 217.7900 The following recommendations are provided with respect to excess soil (705) 742.7900 management at the Project Area. Facsimile (705)742.7907 1. Soil within the proposed parking area (TP101-23 to TP103-23) is impacted Website with metals and exceeds the Table 3.1 ICC ESQS. Excess soil exceeding cambium-inc.com Mailing Address Table 3.1 ICC ESQS requires disposal at a licensed waste disposal P.O. Box 325, Peterborough, Ontario facility. Canada, K9J 6Z3 2. Soil north of the parking area (TP201-24 to TP208-24) within the Project Locations Peterborough Area is the former landfill cap material, and despite soil meeting various Kingston Barrie Ottawa ESQS for reuse, fill material containing debris cannot be reused. If soil is Whitby removed from the Project Area during grading activities it would require Laboratory disposal at a licenced waste disposal facility unless removal of Peterborough debris/waste material is completed. 3. It is noted the soil results are limited to the landfill cap material, testing was not performed below 0.8 mbgs; therefore, comments can not be made on the soil and groundwater quality within the former landfill. Recommendations pertaining to health and safety planning as well as rmfa,on�d further capping of the landfill required prior to development for parkland Ontario APG® use is addressed in an accompanying SLRA provided under a separate cover. 19181-001 Page 144 it CAMBIUM Environmental Geotechnical Building Sciences Construction Testing & Inspections Telephone (866) 217.7900 (705) 742.7900 Facsimile (705) 742.7907 Website cambium-inc.com Mailing Address P.O. Box 325, Peterborough, Ontario Canada, K9J 6Z3 Locations Peterborough Kingston Barrie Ottawa Whitby Laboratory Peterborough Professional Engineers Ontario August 20, 2024 Recommendations provided herein are based solely on the analysis of samples obtained and do not represent acceptance or suitability of this material on behalf of an intended receiving site. Should conditions encountered during excavation vary from those described in this report, Cambium should be notified to evaluate the need for further work. Closing We trust that this report meets your requirements. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding any aspect of this report, or should you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Best regards, Cambium Inc. Laura Fitzgerald, M.Sc. Project Manager — Team Lead MH/LF/ce Encl. Cambium Qualifications and Limitations Salt -Impacted Excess Soil Reuse Rules Figure 1 — Project Area Location Plan Figure 2 — Investigation Locations Figure 3 — Sample Locations Table 1 — Summary of Soil Quality Table 2 — Soil Leachate Quality (TCLP) Laboratory Certificate of Analysis Borehole Logs Curtis Edgington, P.Eng., QPESA Qualified Person Ilcambiumincstorage.file.core.windows. netlproiecW19100to 1919909181-001 Municipality of Clarington- GEO- NorthBowmanvilleDog PaWDeliverablesWEPORT - 2024 SCR0raft12024-08-2X SCR North Bowmanville Dog Park, 19181-001.docx 19181-001 Page145 Page 8 August 20, 2024 i or CAMBIUM Environmental Geotechnical Building Sciences Construction Testing & Inspections Telephone (866) 217.7900 (705) 742.7900 Facsimile (705) 742.7907 Website cambium-inc.com Mailing Address P.O. Box 325, Peterborough, Ontario Canada, K9J 6Z3 Locations Peterborough Kingston Barrie Ottawa Whitby Laboratory Peterborough Pmf—iunal Engineers Ontario CAMBIUM QUALIFICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS Limited Warranty In performing work on behalf of a client, Cambium relies on its client to provide instructions on the scope of its retainer and, on that basis, Cambium determines the precise nature of the work to be performed. Cambium undertakes all work in accordance with applicable accepted industry practices and standards. Unless required under local laws, other than as expressly stated herein, no other warranties or conditions, either expressed or implied, are made regarding the services, work or reports provided. Reliance on Materials and Information The findings and results presented in reports prepared by Cambium are based on the materials and information provided by the client to Cambium and on the facts, conditions and circumstances encountered by Cambium during the performance of the work requested by the client. In formulating its findings and results into a report, Cambium assumes that the information and materials provided by the client or obtained by Cambium from the client or otherwise are factual, accurate and represent a true depiction of the circumstances that exist. Cambium relies on its client to inform Cambium if there are changes to any such information and materials. Cambium does not review, analyze or attempt to verify the accuracy or completeness of the information or materials provided, or circumstances encountered, other than in accordance with applicable accepted industry practice. Cambium will not be responsible for matters arising from incomplete, incorrect or misleading information or from facts or circumstances that are not fully disclosed to or that are concealed from Cambium during the provision of services, work or reports. Facts, conditions, information and circumstances may vary with time and locations and Cambium's work is based on a review of such matters as they existed at the particular time and location indicated in its reports. No assurance is made by Cambium that the facts, conditions, information, circumstances or any underlying assumptions made by Cambium in connection with the work performed will not change after the work is completed and a report is submitted. If any such changes occur or additional information is obtained, Cambium should be advised and requested to consider if the changes or additional information affect its findings or results. When preparing reports, Cambium considers applicable legislation, regulations, governmental guidelines and policies to the extent they are within its knowledge, but Cambium is not qualified to advise with respect to legal matters. The presentation of information regarding applicable legislation, regulations, governmental guidelines and policies is for information only and is not intended to and should not be interpreted as constituting a legal opinion concerning the work completed or conditions outlined in a report. All legal matters should be reviewed and considered by an appropriately qualified legal practitioner. Site Assessments A site assessment is created using data and information collected during the investigation of a site and based on conditions encountered at the time and particular locations at which fieldwork is conducted. The information, sample results and data collected represent the conditions only at the specific times at which and at those specific locations from which the information, samples and data were obtained and the information, sample results and data may vary at other locations and times. To the extent that Cambium's work or report considers any locations or times other than those from which information, sample results and data was specifically received, the work or report is based on a reasonable extrapolation from such information, sample results and data but the actual conditions encountered may vary from those extrapolations. Only conditions at the site and locations chosen for study by the client are evaluated; no adjacent or other properties are evaluated unless specifically requested by the client. Any physical or other aspects of the site chosen for study by the client, or any other matter not specifically addressed in a report prepared by Cambium, are beyond the scope of the work performed by Cambium and such matters have not been investigated or addressed. Reliance Cambium's services, work and reports may be relied on by the client and its corporate directors and officers, employees, and professional advisors. Cambium is not responsible for the use of its work or reports by any other party, or for the reliance on, or for any decision which is made by any party using the services or work performed by or a report prepared by Cambium without Cambium's express written consent. Any party that relies on services or work performed by Cambium or a report prepared by Cambium without Cambium's express written consent, does so at its own risk. No report of Cambium may be disclosed or referred to in any public document without Cambium's express prior written consent. Cambium specifically disclaims any liability or responsibility to any such party for any loss, damage, expense, fine, penalty or other such thing which may arise or result from the use of any information, recommendation or other matter arising from the services, work or reports provided by Cambium. Limitation of Liabilit Potential liability to the client arising out of the report is limited to the amount of Cambium's professional liability insurance coverage. Cambium shall only be liable for direct damages to the extent caused by Cambium's negligence and/or breach of contract. Cambium shall not be liable for consequential damages. Personal Liabilitv The client expressly agrees that Cambium employees shall have no personal liability to the client with respect to a claim, whether in contract, tort and/or other cause of action in law. Furthermore, the client agrees that it will bring no proceedings nor take any action in any court of law against Cambium employees in their personal capacity. 19181-001 Page146 Page 9 August 20, 2024 CAMBIUM Environmental Geotechnical Building Sciences Construction Testing & Inspections Telephone (866) 217.7900 (705) 742.7900 Facsimile (705) 742.7907 Website cambium-inc.com Mailing Address P.O. Box 325, Peterborough, Ontario Canada. K9J 6Z3 Locations Peterborough Kingston Barrie Ottawa Whitby Laboratory Peterborough PMfe ionzl Engineers ®i Ontario Salt -Impacted Excess Soil Reuse Rules For the purposes of deemed compliance with excess soil quality standards as set out in paragraph 1 of subsection 1 (10.1) of Section A in Part II, salt -impacted excess soil shall be placed in accordance with the following: a. Salt -impacted excess soil may be placed in any area of the reuse site where it is anticipated a substance will be applied for the safety of vehicular or pedestrian traffic under conditions of snow or ice. b. Salt -impacted excess soil may be placed at any reuse site used for an industrial or commercial property use. c. In respect of a reuse site used for a community, parkland, institutional, or residential use, i. salt -impacted excess soil may be placed at a depth of at least 1.5 metres below the soil surface, or ii. if subparagraph i does not apply, it must be finally placed in accordance with a landscape plan described in subsection 5(8) of the regulation that meets the requirements set out in paragraph 3. In respect of a reuse site used for an agricultural or other property use, i. salt -impacted excess soil may be finally placed at a depth of at least 1.5 metres below the soil surface, or ii. if subparagraph i does not apply, in areas that will not be vegetated and only to achieve a grade necessary to construct a planned building, including a barn or greenhouse, or install a driveway or parking area. 2. Despite paragraph 1, in all cases, salt -impacted excess soil shall not be finally placed at any of the following areas of a reuse site: a. within 30 metres of a waterbody; b. within 100 metres of a potable water well or, with respect to an approved lot that may require a potable water well, within 100 metres of the planned water well location or if the location of the well is unknown, the centre of the lot; or c. an area that will be used for growing crops or pasturing livestock unless the salt - impacted excess soil is placed 1.5 metres or greater below the soil surface. 3. A landscape plan for the purposes of subsection 5(8) of the regulation and subclause 1.c)(ii) shall: A. Identify the areas within the reuse site in which salt -impacted excess soil can be finally placed, which shall include only the following: a. An area that will be unvegetated and that is not an area of the reuse site described in paragraph 2. b. An area that is not an area described in paragraph 2 and that will be vegetated with vegetation that, i. may tolerate elevated levels of chemicals associated with salt -impacted excess soil, or ii. requires less than 1.5 metres of soil that meets applicable excess soil quality standards to grow successfully. B. Identify, for each area mentioned in subparagraph A.b): a. The types of vegetation that may be planted in that area, b. The acceptable levels of salt -related contaminants that may be tolerated by the vegetation mentioned in subparagraph A.b)i, if applicable, and c. The depth of soil that must meet the applicable excess soil quality standards in order for the vegetation mentioned in subparagraph A.b)ii to grow successfully, if applicable. C. Be signed by a person with qualifications as set out in subsection 5(10) of the regulation. 19181-001 Page 147 Page 10 1 i 2 lx SOIL CHARACTERIZATION r \ REPORT THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON North Bowmanville Dog Park Bowmanville, Ontario 1 LEGEND 4 Highway v J / Major Road Minor Road �— Railway — Watercourse 115 Water Area First Nations Reserve QProvincial Park Wooded Area Built Up Area 5 E his document contains information licensed under the Open Gmemmenl License - Ontario. Distances this plan are in metres and can be converted to feet by dividing by .3 - Cambium Inc. Inc. m. makes every effort is ensure this map is free from enera but nosh be held responsible for any damages due to error omissions. This map should notfor navigation or legal purposes. It It is intended for general referencee uses. only. �- 194 Sophia Street _ = Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 1 H Tel: (705) 742.7900 Fax: (705) 742.7907 www.cambium-inc.com CAMBIUM PROJECT AREA LOCATION PLAN Project No.: Date: July 2024 19181-001 Rev.: Scale: Projection: 0 1 2 3 4 5 1:100,000 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N Page 148 km Created by: LD Checked by: LF Figure: Area of Potential APEC 1 APEC 2 Potentially Contaminating Activit 1 SOIL CHARACTERIZATION REPORT PCA A58: Waste Disposal and Waste Management, including thermal THE MUNICIPALITY 1 treatment, landfilling and transfer of waste, other than use of biosoils as soil conditioners OF CLARINGTON North Bowmanville Dog Park "#30: on of Fill Material of Unknown Quality Bowmanville, Ontario LEGEND Test Pit Gravel Parking Lot Project Area Areas of Potential Environmental Concern: APEC 1, 2 Notes: - Project Area and Gravel Parking Lot Area are approximate and were obtained from Project North Bowmanville Leash Free Dog Park, Grading Plan, Drawing No. 1-3, Dated Oct 2023. -This document contains information licensed under the Open Govemment License -Ontario. - Distances on this plan are in metres and can be converted to feet by dividing by 0.3048. f - Cambium Inc. makes every effort to ensure this map is free from errors but not be held responsible for any damages due to emor or omissions. This map sr cold not be used for navigation or legal purposes. It is intended for general reference use only. r 194 Sophia Street _ = Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 1 E5 �_ r Tel: (705) 742,7900 Fax: (705) 742.7907 owww.cambiu.-Inc.com CAMBIUM INVESTIGATION LOCATIONS Project No.: Date: July 2024 19181-001 Rev.: Scale: Projection: 0 10 20 30 40 50 1:1,500 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N - - W.. I I I I Im Created by: Checked by: I Figure: Page 149 LD LF SOIL CHARACTERIZATION Table 1 Contaminant Table 1 AO Table 2.1 AO Table 2.1 RPI Table 2.1 ICC Table 3.1 RPI Table 3.1 ICC 1 RPIICC REPORT THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PHC F2 10 10 10 10 26 10 26 PHC F3 240 240 240 240 240 300 1,700 North Bowmanville Dog Park PHC F4 120 120 2800 2800 3300 2800 3300 Bowmanville, Ontario Antimony 1 1.3 7.5 7.5 40 7.5 40 LEGEND Barium 210 220 390 390 670 390 670 Copper 62 92 140 140 230 140 230 Test Pit Lead 45 120 45 120 120 120 120 ® Meets Table 1 AO zinc 290 1 290 340 340 340 340 340 OExceeds Table 1 AO Gravel Parking Lot TP201-24 j Project Area i _ �� P TP209-24 TP202-24 TP103 Depth Inn) 0.2-0.6 - Sample Date 2023-Nov-27 TP208-24 PHC F2 a TP204-24 i PHC F3 45 PHC F4 <6 TP203 Antimony 27.5 Sample Type Parent Duplicate TP203-24 TP206-24 Barium 245 Depth (m) 0.6-0.8 0.6-0.8 Capper 77.1 Sample Date 2024-Ju1-03 2024-Jul-03 __. PHCF2 13 11 TP103-23 Lead 216 PHC F3 324 403 inc 469 TP205-24 TP207-24 PHC F4 88 266 Antimony <3.0 <1.0 - - Barium 25.3 22.8 Copper 6.1 5.4 Lead 23.6 32.6 't . TP102 Zinc 24.0 z3.z TP102-23 Sample Type Parent Duplicate Depth (m) 0.2-0.6 0.2-0.6 Sample Date P 2023-Nav-27 2023-Nov-27 Notes: - Project Area and Gravel Parking Lot Area are approximate and were obtained from Project: North Bowmanville Leash Free Dog Park, Grading PHC F2 <4 <4 Plan, Crewing No. 1-3, Dated Oct 2023. TP101 _ PHC F3 167 7q -This document contains information lira-d-smir the Open Govemment License - Ontario. Depth (m) 0.2-0.4 `' PHC F4 132 82 - Distances on this plan are in metres and can be converted to feet by dividing by 0.3048. Sample Date 2023-Now27 TP101-23 Antimony 13.5 4.5 -Cambium Inc. makes every ei to ensure this map is free from errors but nnot be held responsible for any damages due to error or omissions. This PHC F2 <4 Barium 168 155 map should not be used for navigation or legal purposes. It is intended for 9-cral reference use only. PHC F3 100 Copper Co 61.8 50.5 _ t PHC F4 284 Lead 277 361 Antimony <1.0 . $ Zinc q75 ;g7 194 Sophia Street _ = Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 1 E5 Barium 42.6 Tel: (705) 742.7900 Fax: (705) 742.7907 % www.cambium-inc.com Copper 15.2 •} CAMBIUM Lead 10.9 zinr 55.4 SOIL QUALITY - _ Project No.: Date: July 2024 19181-001 Rev.: Scale: Projection: 0 10 20 30 40 50 1:1,500 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N m Created by: Checked by: Figure: Page 150 LD LF C. Table Soil Characterization Report North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario The Municipality of Clarington Cambium Ref: 19181-001 & BUM Location Code Field ID 3 - Soil Leachate Quality Depth (mbgs) Date TP102-24 TP102 0.2-0.6 0.2-0.6 27 Nov 2023 Unit EQL O.Reg 558 Metals Arsenic pg/L 50 2,500 <50 Barium pg/L 50 100,000 1450 Boron pg/L 50 500,000 <50 Cadmium pg/L 10 500 <10 Chromium (III+VI) pg/L 50 5,000 <50 Lead pg/L 50 5,000 110 Selenium pg/L 50 1,000 <50 Silver pg/L 50 5,000 <50 Uranium pg/L 50 10,000 <50 ORPs Cyanide (Free) pg/L 20 20,000 <20 Mercury pg/L 5 100 <5 Nitrate (as N) mg/L 1 NV <1 Nitrite (as N) mg/L 1 NV <1 Nitrite + Nitrate (as N) mg/L 2 1,000 <2 Other Fluoride mg/L 0.05 150 0.20 Page 152 PARA C E L LABORATORIES LTD. Cambium Inc. (Whitby) 223 Brock Street North, Unit 7 Whitby, ON L1 N 41\16 Attn: Laura Fitzgerald Client PO: Project: 19181-001 Custody: 144911, 144912 TRUSTED. RESPONSIVE. RELIABLE. Certificate of Analysis This Certificate of Analysis contains analytical data applicable to the following samples as submitted: ParacellD Client ID 2427237-02 TP201 0.6-0.8 2427237-03 TP202 0.5-0.7 2427237-04 TP203 0.4-0.6 2427237-05 TP203 0.6-0.8 2427237-06 TP204 0.5-0.7 2427237-07 TP205 0.3-0.5 2427237-08 TP206 0.4-0.6 2427237-09 TP207 0.4-0.6 2427237-10 TP208 0.4-0.6 2427237-12 TP208 0.2-0.4 2427237-13 QAQC201 Approved By: Mark Foto, M.Sc. Lab Supervisor Revised Report 1-800-749-1947 www.paracellabs.com Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Order #: 2427237 Page 1 of 34 Page 153 PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Analysis Summary Table Project Description: 19181-001 Analysis Method Reference/Description Extraction Date Analysis Date Boron, available MOE (HWE), EPA 200.8 - ICP-MS 9-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 Chromium, hexavalent - soil MOE E3056 - Extraction, colourimetric 9-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 Conductivity MOE E3138 - probe @25 °C, water ext 9-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 Cyanide, free MOE E3015 - Auto Colour, water extraction 9-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 Mercury by CVAA EPA 7471 B - CVAA, digestion 9-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 PCBs, total SW846 8082A - GC-ECD 9-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 pH, soil EPA 150.1 - pH probe @ 25 °C, CaCI buffered ext. 9-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 PHC F1 CWS Tier 1 - P&T GC-FID 8-Jul-24 8-Jul-24 PHC F4G (gravimetric) CWS Tier 1 - Extraction Gravimetric 8-Jul-24 10-Ju1-24 PHCs F2 to F4 CWS Tier 1 - GC-FID, extraction 8-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 REG 153: Metals by ICP/MS, soil EPA 6020 - Digestion - ICP-MS 9-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 REG 153: PAHs by GC -MS EPA 8270 - GC -MS, extraction 8-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 REG 153: VOCs by P&T GC/MS EPA 8260 - P&T GC -MS 8-Jul-24 8-Jul-24 SAR Calculated 9-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 Solids, % CWS Tier 1 - Gravimetric 8-Jul-24 9-Jul-24 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 2 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 Paowaracellabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Summary of Criteria Exceedances (If this page is blank then there are no exceedances) Only those criteria that a sample exceeds will be highlighted in red Regulatory Comparison: Paracel Laboratories has provided regulatory guidelines on this report for informational purposes only and makes no representations or warranties that the data is accurate or reflects the current regulatory values. The user is advised to consult with the appropriate official regulations to evaluate compliance. Sample results that are highlighted have exceeded the selected regulatory limit. Calculated uncertainty estimations have not been applied for determining regulatory exceedances. Sample Analyte MDL / Units Result Reg 153/04 -T1 Res Project Description: 19181-001 TP203 0.4-0.6 SAR 0.01 N/A 11.2 TP203 0.4-0.6 Conductivity 0.005 mS/cm 1.04 TP203 0.6-0.8 F2 PHCs (C10-C16) 4 ug/g 13 . . TP203_0.6-0.8 F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 8 ug/g 324 . . QAQC201 F2 PHCs (C10-C16) 4 ug/g 11 . . QAQC201 F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 8 ug/g 403 . . QAQC201 F4 PHCs (C34-050) 6 ug/g 125 [2] . . QAQC201 F4G PHCs (gravimetric) 50 ug/g 266 . . OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 3 of 34 1-a100-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs.com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Project Description: 19181-001 TP201 0.6-0.8 TP202 0.5-0.7 TP203 0.4-0.6 TP203 0.6-0.8 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-02 2427237-03 2427237-04 2427237-05 Soil Soil Soil Soil Physical Characteristics % Solids 0.1 % by Wt. 90.7 91.1 87.4 90.5 General Inorganics SAR 0.01 N/A 0.09 0.09 0.07 2.4 N/A Conductivity 0.005 mS/cm 0.114 0.081 0.329 0.57 mS/cm Cyanide, free 0.03 ug/g <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 0.051 ug/g pH 0.05 pH Units 6.88 7.12 7.43 6.98 5.00 - 9.00 pH Units Metals Antimony 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.3 ug/g Arsenic 1.0 ug/g 2.0 1.4 7.4 1.9 18 ug/g Barium 1.0 ug/g 15.9 12.7 62.5 25.3 220 ug/g Beryllium 0.5 ug/g <0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 2.5 ug/g Boron 5.0 ug/g <5.0 <5.0 11.4 <5.0 36 ug/g Boron, available 0.5 ug/g <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Cadmium 0.5 ug/g <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.2 ug/g Chromium (VI) 0.2 ug/g <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.66 ug/g Chromium 5.0 ug/g 7.9 6.1 22.1 10.0 70 ug/g Cobalt 1.0 ug/g 2.4 1.6 9.1 2.5 21 ug/g Copper 5.0 ug/g <5.0 <5.0 15.9 6.1 92 ug/g Lead 1.0 ug/g 1.9 1.5 8.1 23.6 120 ug/g Mercury 0.1 ug/g <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.27 ug/g Molybdenum 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 1.8 <1.0 2 ug/g Nickel 5.0 ug/g <5.0 <5.0 23.7 5.2 82 ug/g Selenium 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.5 ug/g Silver 0.3 ug/g 1 <0.3 1 <0.3 1 <0.3 1 <0.3 1 0.5 ug/g Thallium 1.0 ug/g I <1.0 I <1.0 I <1.0 I <1.0 I 1 ug/g OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 4 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 Paowaracellabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Metals Project Description: 19181-001 TP201 0.6-0.8 TP202 0.5-0.7 TP203 0.4-0.6 TP203 0.6-0.8 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-02 2427237-03 2427237-04 2427237-05 Soil Soil Soil Soil Uranium 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.5 ug/g Vanadium 10.0 ug/g 18.0 14.0 33.8 19.1 86 ug/g Zinc 20.0 ug/g <20.0 <20.0 49.8 24.0 290 ug/g Volatiles Acetone 0.50 ug/g <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.5 ug/g Benzene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 ug/g Bromodichloromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Bromoform 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Bromomethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Carbon Tetrachloride 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Chlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Chloroform 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Dibromochloromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 trans- 1,3-Dichloropropylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 1 <0.0 1 <0.05 1 <0.05 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 5 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Volatiles Project Description: 19181-001 TP201 0.6-0.8 TP202 0.5-0.7 TP203 0.4-0.6 TP203 0.6-0.8 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-02 2427237-03 2427237-04 2427237-05 Soil Soil Soil Soil 1,3-Dichloropropene, total 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Ethylbenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Ethylene dibromide (dibromoethane, 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Hexane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 0.50 ug/g <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.5 ug/g Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 0.50 ug/g <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.5 ug/g Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Methylene Chloride 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Styrene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Tetrachloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Toluene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.2 ug/g 1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Trichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Trichlorofluoromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.25 ug/g Vinyl chloride 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 ug/g m,p-Xylenes 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 o-Xylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Xylenes, total 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Dibromofluoromethane Surrogate 114% 118% 76.9% 118% 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate 104% 104% 98.3% 104% Toluene-d8 Surrogate 121 % 119% 127% 120% Hydrocarbons OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 6 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Hydrocarbons Project Description: 19181-001 TP201 0.6-0.8 TP202 0.5-0.7 TP203 0.4-0.6 TP203 0.6-0.8 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-02 2427237-03 2427237-04 2427237-05 Soil Soil Soil Soil F1 PHCs (C6-C10) 7 ug/g <7 <7 <7 <7 25 ug/g F2 PHCs (C10-C16) 4 ug/g <4 <4 <4 10 ug/g F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 8 ug/g 19 <8 <8 240 ug/g F4 PHCs (C34-050) 6 ug/g 7 <6 <6 88 120 ug/g Semi-Volatiles Acenaphthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.072 ug/g Acenaphthylene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.093 ug/g Anthracene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.16 ug/g Benzo [a] anthracene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.03 0.36 ug/g Benzo [a] pyrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 0.3 ug/g Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.03 0.47 ug/g Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 0.68 ug/g Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 0.48 ug/g Chrysene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.04 2.8 ug/g Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.1 ug/g Fluoranthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.06 0.56 ug/g Fluorene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.12 ug/g Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.03 0.23 ug/g 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.59 ug/g 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.59 ug/g Methylnaphthalene (1&2) 0.04 ug/g <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 0.59 ug/g Naphthalene 0.01 ug/g <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.09 ug/g Phenanthrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.06 0.69 ug/g Pyrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.07 1 ug/g 2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 69.0% 67.5% 57.8% 73.8% OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 7 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Project Description: 19181-001 TP201 0.6-0.8 TP202 0.5-0.7 TP203 0.4-0.6 TP203 0.6-0.8 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-02 2427237-03 2427237-04 2427237-05 Soil Soil Soil Soil Semi-Volatiles Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 83.4% 82.9% 53.1% 83.4% PCBs PCBs, total 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.3 ug/g Decachlorobiphenyl Surrogate 119% 124% 110% 111 % OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 8 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Project Description: 19181-001 TP204 0.5-0.7 TP205 0.3-0.5 TP206 0.4-0.6 TP207 0.4-0.6 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-06 2427237-07 2427237-08 2427237-09 Soil Soil Soil Soil Physical Characteristics % Solids 0.1 % by Wt. 90.5 87.1 90.3 91.8 General Inorganics SAR 0.01 N/A 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 2.4 N/A Conductivity 0.005 mS/cm 0.389 0.136 0.137 0.098 0.57 mS/cm Cyanide, free 0.03 ug/g <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 0.051 ug/g pH 0.05 pH Units 7.10 7.07 7.18 7.42 5.00 - 9.00 pH Units Metals Antimony 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.3 ug/g Arsenic 1.0 ug/g 2.0 2.5 1.7 2.4 18 ug/g Barium 1.0 ug/g 24.1 34.5 16.7 54.6 220 ug/g Beryllium 0.5 ug/g <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.5 ug/g Boron 5.0 ug/g <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 7.0 36 ug/g Boron, available 0.5 ug/g <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Cadmium 0.5 ug/g <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.2 ug/g Chromium (VI) 0.2 ug/g <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.66 ug/g Chromium 5.0 ug/g 9.1 11.2 8.0 14.2 70 ug/g Cobalt 1.0 ug/g 2.6 3.4 2.4 4.3 21 ug/g Copper 5.0 ug/g 5.4 7.0 <5.0 10.0 92 ug/g Lead 1.0 ug/g 5.3 7.9 2.4 12.0 120 ug/g Mercury 0.1 ug/g <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.27 ug/g Molybdenum 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2 ug/g Nickel 5.0 ug/g <5.0 6.1 <5.0 8.2 82 ug/g Selenium 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.5 ug/g Silver 0.3 ug/g 1 <0.3 1 <0.3 1 <0.3 1 <0.3 1 0.5 ug/g Thallium 1.0 ug/g I <1.0 I <1.0 I <1.0 I <1.0 I 1 ug/g OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 9 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Metals Project Description: 19181-001 TP204 0.5-0.7 TP205 0.3-0.5 TP206 0.4-0.6 TP207 0.4-0.6 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-06 2427237-07 2427237-08 2427237-09 Soil Soil Soil Soil Uranium 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.5 ug/g Vanadium 10.0 ug/g 18.3 22.6 17.8 25.2 86 ug/g Zinc 20.0 ug/g 20.9 29.5 <20.0 48.1 290 ug/g Volatiles Acetone 0.50 ug/g <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.5 ug/g Benzene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 ug/g Bromodichloromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Bromoform 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Bromomethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Carbon Tetrachloride 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Chlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Chloroform 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Dibromochloromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 trans- 1,3-Dichloropropylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 1 <0.0 1 <0.05 1 <0.05 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 10 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Volatiles Project Description: 19181-001 TP204 0.5-0.7 TP205 0.3-0.5 TP206 0.4-0.6 TP207 0.4-0.6 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-06 2427237-07 2427237-08 2427237-09 Soil Soil Soil Soil 1,3-Dichloropropene, total 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Ethylene dibromide (dibromoethane, 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Ethylbenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Hexane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 0.50 ug/g <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.5 ug/g Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 0.50 ug/g <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.5 ug/g Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Methylene Chloride 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Styrene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Tetrachloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Toluene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.2 ug/g 1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Trichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Trichlorofluoromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.25 ug/g Vinyl chloride 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 ug/g m,p-Xylenes 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 o-Xylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Xylenes, total 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate 102% 106% 104% 95.2% Toluene-d8 Surrogate 118% 122% 1200 110% Dibromofluoromethane Surrogate 118% 117% 117% 78.2% Hydrocarbons OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 11 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Hydrocarbons Project Description: 19181-001 TP204 0.5-0.7 TP205 0.3-0.5 TP206 0.4-0.6 TP207 0.4-0.6 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-06 2427237-07 2427237-08 2427237-09 Soil Soil Soil Soil F1 PHCs (C6-C10) 7 ug/g <7 <7 <7 <7 25 ug/g F2 PHCs (C10-C16) 4 ug/g 5 <4 <4 <4 10 ug/g F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 8 ug/g 119 10 27 <8 240 ug/g F4 PHCs (C34-050) 6 ug/g 47 7 7 <6 120 ug/g Semi-Volatiles Acenaphthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.072 ug/g Acenaphthylene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.093 ug/g Anthracene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.16 ug/g Benzo [a] anthracene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.36 ug/g Benzo [a] pyrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.3 ug/g Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.47 ug/g Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.68 ug/g Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.48 ug/g Chrysene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 2.8 ug/g Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.1 ug/g Fluoranthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.56 ug/g Fluorene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.12 ug/g Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.23 ug/g 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.59 ug/g 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.59 ug/g Methylnaphthalene (1&2) 0.04 ug/g <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 0.59 ug/g Naphthalene 0.01 ug/g 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.09 ug/g Phenanthrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.69 ug/g Pyrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 1 ug/g 2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 54.6% 62.2% 55.1% 74.4% OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 12 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Project Description: 19181-001 TP204 0.5-0.7 TP205 0.3-0.5 TP206 0.4-0.6 TP207 0.4-0.6 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-06 2427237-07 2427237-08 2427237-09 Soil Soil Soil Soil Semi-Volatiles Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 58.9% 83.5% 76.5% 70.7% PCBs PCBs, total 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.3 ug/g Decachlorobiphenyl Surrogate 114% 109% 110% 109% OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 13 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgengaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Project Description: 19181-001 TP208 0.4-0.6 TP208 0.2-0.4 QAQC201 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-10 2427237-12 2427237-13 Soil Soil Soil Physical Characteristics % Solids 0.1 % by Wt. 89.1 91.3 90.3 General Inorganics SAR 0.01 N/A 0.11 0.12 0.07 2.4 N/A Conductivity 0.005 mS/cm 0.103 0.088 0.339 0.57 mS/cm Cyanide, free 0.03 ug/g <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 0.051 ug/g pH 0.05 pH Units 7.41 7.50 7.07 5.00 - 9.00 pH Units Metals Antimony 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.3 ug/g Arsenic 1.0 ug/g 1.3 1.2 2.1 18 ug/g Barium 1.0 ug/g 23.3 18.7 22.8 220 ug/g Beryllium 0.5 ug/g <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.5 ug/g Boron, available 0.5 ug/g <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Boron 5.0 ug/g <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 36 ug/g Cadmium 0.5 ug/g <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.2 ug/g Chromium 5.0 ug/g 8.9 7.0 8.9 70 ug/g Chromium (VI) 0.2 ug/g <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.66 ug/g Cobalt 1.0 ug/g 2.4 2.1 2.4 21 ug/g Copper 5.0 ug/g <5.0 <5.0 5.4 92 ug/g Lead 1.0 ug/g 4.1 1.8 32.6 120 ug/g Mercury 0.1 ug/g <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.27 ug/g Molybdenum 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2 ug/g Nickel 5.0 ug/g <5.0 <5.0 5.1 82 ug/g Selenium 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.5 ug/g Silver 0.3 ug/g 1 <0.3 1 <0.3 1 <0.3 1- 0.5 ug/g Thallium 1.0 ug/g I <1.0 I <1.0 I <1.0 I - i 1 ug/g OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 14 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgenearacellabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Metals Project Description: 19181-001 TP208 0.4-0.6 TP208 0.2-0.4 QAQC201 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-10 2427237-12 2427237-13 Soil Soil Soil Uranium 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.5 ug/g Vanadium 10.0 ug/g 18.1 15.8 18.1 86 ug/g Zinc 20.0 ug/g <20.0 <20.0 23.2 290 ug/g Volatiles Acetone 0.50 ug/g <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.5 ug/g Benzene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 ug/g Bromodichloromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Bromoform 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Bromomethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Carbon Tetrachloride 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Chlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Chloroform 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Dibromochloromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - 0.05 ug/g cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - trans- 1,3-Dichloropropylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 1 <0.0 1 <0.05 - OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 15 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Volatiles Project Description: 19181-001 TP208 0.4-0.6 TP208 0.2-0.4 QAQC201 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-10 2427237-12 2427237-13 Soil Soil Soil 1,3-Dichloropropene, total 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Ethylene dibromide (dibromoethane, 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Ethylbenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Hexane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 0.50 ug/g <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.5 ug/g Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 0.50 ug/g <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.5 ug/g Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Methylene Chloride 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Styrene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Tetrachloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Toluene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.2 ug/g 1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Trichloroethylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Trichlorofluoromethane 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.25 ug/g Vinyl chloride 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 ug/g m,p-Xylenes 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 o-Xylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Xylenes, total 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Toluene-d8 Surrogate 113% 116% 120% Dibromofluoromethane Surrogate 79.5% 78.1% 115% 4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate 97.0% 103% 103% Hydrocarbons OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 16 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Hydrocarbons Project Description: 19181-001 TP208 0.4-0.6 TP208 0.2-0.4 QAQC201 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-10 2427237-12 2427237-13 Soil Soil Soil F1 PHCs (C6-C10) 7 ug/g <7 <7 <7 25 ug/g F2 PHCs (C10-C16) 4 ug/g <4 <4 10 ug/g F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 8 ug/g 20 <8 240 ug/g F4 PHCs (C34-050) 6 ug/g 16 <6 120 ug/g F4G PHCs (gravimetric) 50 ug/g 120 ug/g Semi-Volatiles Acenaphthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.072 ug/g Acenaphthylene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.093 ug/g Anthracene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.16 ug/g Benzo [a] anthracene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.36 ug/g Benzo [a] pyrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.3 ug/g Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.47 ug/g Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.68 ug/g Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.48 ug/g Chrysene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 2.8 ug/g Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.1 ug/g Fluoranthene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.56 ug/g Fluorene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.12 ug/g Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.23 ug/g 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.59 ug/g 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.59 ug/g Methylnaphthalene (1&2) 0.04 ug/g <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 0.59 ug/g Naphthalene 0.01 ug/g <0.01 <0.01 I <0.01 0.09 ug/g Phenanthrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 1 <0.02 0.69 ug/g Pyrene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 1 <0.02 - 1 ug/g OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 17 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracellabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Semi-Volatiles Project Description: 19181-001 TP208 0.4-0.6 TP208 0.2-0.4 QAQC201 Criteria: 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 03-Jul-24 00:00 Reg 153/04 -T1 Res - 2427237-10 2427237-12 2427237-13 Soil Soil Soil 2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 70.1% 90.0% 54.8% Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 71.7% 60.5% 58.3% PCBs PCBs, total 1 0.05 ug/g 1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.3 ug/g Decachlorobiphenyl Surrogate 90.2% 107% 94.2% OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 18 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 Pag6'' loaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Blank F lyte Result Reporting Units %REC %REC RPD RPD Notes Limit Limit Limit General Inorganics Conductivity ND 0.005 mS/cm Cyanide, free ND 0.03 ug/g Hydrocarbons F1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 7 ug/g F2 PHCs (C10-C16) ND 4 ug/g F3 PHCs (C16-C34) ND 8 ug/g F4 PHCs (C34-050) ND 6 ug/g F4G PHCs (gravimetric) ND 50 ug/g Metals Antimony ND 1.0 ug/g Arsenic ND 1.0 ug/g Barium ND 1.0 ug/g Beryllium ND 0.5 ug/g Boron, available ND 0.5 ug/g Boron ND 5.0 ug/g Cadmium ND 0.5 ug/g Chromium (VI) ND 0.2 ug/g Chromium ND 5.0 ug/g Cobalt ND 1.0 ug/g Copper ND 5.0 ug/g Lead ND 1.0 ug/g Mercury ND 0.1 ug/g Molybdenum ND 1.0 ug/g Nickel ND 5.0 ug/g Selenium ND 1.0 ug/g Silver ND 0.3 ug/g Thallium ND 1.0 ug/g Uranium ND 1.0 ug/g Vanadium ND 10.0 ug/g Zinc ND 20.0 ug/g PCBs PCBs, total ND 0.05 ug/g OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 19 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAg6 vfaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Blank Analyte Result Reporting Units %REC %REC RPD RPD Notes Limit Limit Limit Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 0.116 % 116 60-140 Semi-Volatiles Acenaphthene ND 0.02 ug/g Acenaphthylene ND 0.02 ug/g Anthracene ND 0.02 ug/g Benzo [a] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/g Benzo [a] pyrene ND 0.02 ug/g Benzo [b] fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/g Benzo [g,h,i] perylene ND 0.02 ug/g Benzo [k] fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/g Chrysene ND 0.02 ug/g Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/g Fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/g Fluorene ND 0.02 ug/g Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene ND 0.02 ug/g 1-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/g 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/g Methylnaphthalene (1&2) ND 0.04 ug/g Naphthalene ND 0.01 ug/g Phenanthrene ND 0.02 ug/g Pyrene ND 0.02 ug/g Surrogate:2-Fluorobiphenyl 0.982 % 73.6 50-140 Surrogate: Terphenyl-d14 1.17 % 87.4 50-140 Volatiles Acetone ND 0.50 ug/g Benzene ND 0.02 ug/g Bromodichloromethane ND 0.05 ug/g Bromoform ND 0.05 ug/g Bromomethane ND 0.05 ug/g Carbon Tetrachloride ND 0.05 ug/g Chlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g Chloroform ND 0.05 ug/g OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 20 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 Pwii2aracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 Aethod Quality Control: Blank 4nalyte Result Reporting Units %REC %REC RPD RPD Notes Limit Limit Limit Dibromochloromethane ND 0.05 ug/g Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g 1,1-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.05 ug/g cis- 1,3-Dichloropropylene ND 0.05 ug/g trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene ND 0.05 ug/g 1,3-Dichloropropene, total ND 0.05 ug/g Ethylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/g Ethylene dibromide (dibromoethane, 1,2-) ND 0.05 ug/g Hexane ND 0.05 ug/g Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) ND 0.50 ug/g Methyl Isobutyl Ketone ND 0.50 ug/g Methyl tert-butyl ether ND 0.05 ug/g Methylene Chloride ND 0.05 ug/g Styrene ND 0.05 ug/g 1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g Tetrachloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g Toluene ND 0.05 ug/g 1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g Trichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.05 ug/g Vinyl chloride ND 0.02 ug/g m,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/g o-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/g OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 21 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 Pagd'' iaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Blank Analyte Result Reporting Units %REC %REC RPD RPD Notes Limit Limit Limit Xylenes, total ND 0.05 ug/g Surrogate:4-Bromofluorobenzene 8.00 % 100 50-140 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 8.05 % 101 50-140 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 9.13 % 114 50-140 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 22 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 P6gdv4aracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Duplicate Reporting Source o /D%REC RPD Analyte Result Units REG RPD Notes Limit Result Limit Limit General Inorganics SAR 1.21 0.01 N/A 1.19 1.7 30 Conductivity 0.259 0.005 mS/cm 0.262 1.1 5 Cyanide, free ND 0.03 ug/g ND NC 35 pH 7.26 0.05 pH Units 7.29 0.4 2.3 Hydrocarbons F1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 7 ug/g ND NC 40 F2 PHCs (C10-C16) ND 40 ug/g ND NC 30 GEN09 F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 204 80 ug/g 433 71.8 30 QR-05 F4 PHCs (C34-050) 555 60 ug/g 1190 72.9 30 QR-05 Metals Antimony ND 1.0 ug/g ND NC 30 Arsenic 6.8 1.0 ug/g 5.7 18.3 30 Barium 48.3 1.0 ug/g 45.0 7.0 30 Beryllium ND 0.5 ug/g ND NC 30 Boron, available ND 0.5 ug/g ND NC 35 Boron 9.7 5.0 ug/g 7.9 19.6 30 Cadmium ND 0.5 ug/g ND NC 30 Chromium (VI) ND 0.2 ug/g ND NC 35 Chromium 17.5 5.0 ug/g 21.2 19.4 30 Cobalt 6.4 1.0 ug/g 6.0 6.6 30 Copper 18.4 5.0 ug/g 17.4 5.2 30 Lead 17.5 1.0 ug/g 17.6 0.9 30 Mercury ND 0.1 ug/g ND NC 30 Molybdenum 2.3 1.0 ug/g 2.6 12.4 30 Nickel 16.8 5.0 ug/g 15.5 8.0 30 Selenium ND 1.0 ug/g ND NC 30 Silver ND 0.3 ug/g ND NC 30 Thallium ND 1.0 ug/g ND NC 30 Uranium ND 1.0 ug/g ND NC 30 Vanadium 26.5 10.0 ug/g 24.4 8.0 30 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 23 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAg6 v 5aracellabs,corn PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Duplicate Reporting Source o /o%REC RPD Analyte Result Units REC RPD Notes Limit Result Limit Limit Zinc 58.7 20.0 ug/g 56.1 4.6 30 PCBs PCBs, total ND 1.00 ug/g ND NC 40 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 0.139 % 123 60-140 Physical Characteristics % Solids 88.7 0.1 % by Wt. 88.2 0.6 25 Semi-Volatiles Acenaphthene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Acenaphthylene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Anthracene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Benzo [a] anthracene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Benzo [a] pyrene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Benzo [b] fluoranthene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Benzo [g,h,i] perylene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Benzo [k] fluoranthene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Chrysene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Fluoranthene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Fluorene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 1-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Naphthalene ND 0.20 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Phenanthrene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Pyrene ND 0.40 ug/g ND NC 40 GEN09 Surrogate:2-Fluorobiphenyl 0.979 % 65.3 50-140 Surrogate: Terphenyl-d14 0.980 % 65.3 50-140 Volatiles Acetone ND 0.50 ug/g ND NC 50 Benzene ND 0.02 ug/g ND NC 50 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 24 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 Pagd'' eararelIabs,corn PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Duplicate Reporting Source o /o%REC RPD Analyte Result Units REC RPD Notes Limit Result Limit Limit Bromoform ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Bromomethane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Carbon Tetrachloride ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Chlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Chloroform ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 1,1-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 trans- 1,3-Dichloropropylene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Ethylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Ethylene dibromide (dibromoethane, 1,2-) ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Hexane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) ND 0.50 ug/g ND NC 50 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone ND 0.50 ug/g ND NC 50 Methyl tert-butyl ether ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Methylene Chloride ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Styrene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Tetrachloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Toluene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 25 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 Pwiirracellabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Duplicate Reporting Source o /o%REC RPD Analyte Result Units REC RPD Notes Limit Result Limit Limit 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Trichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Vinyl chloride ND 0.02 ug/g ND NC 50 m,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 o-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Surrogate:4-Bromofluorobenzene 9.03 % 103 50-140 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 9.87 % 113 50-140 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10.5 % 119 50-140 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL 1-a00-749-1947 Pagd'' 8aracelIabs,corn Page 26 of 34 PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Spike Anal to Reporting Source %REC RPD y Result Limit Units Result %REC Limit RPD Limit Notes General Inorganics Cyanide, free 0.244 0.03 ug/g ND 72.2 50-150 Hydrocarbons F1 PHCs (C6-C10) 174 7 ug/g ND 101 85-115 F2 PHCs (C10-C16) 100 4 ug/g ND 109 60-140 F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 246 8 ug/g ND 110 60-140 F4 PHCs (C34-050) 137 6 ug/g ND 96.5 60-140 F4G PHCs (gravimetric) 1060 50 ug/g ND 106 80-120 Metals Arsenic 56.3 1.0 ug/g 2.3 108 70-130 Barium 67.0 1.0 ug/g 18.0 98.0 70-130 Beryllium 54.5 0.5 ug/g ND 109 70-130 Boron, available 3.74 0.5 ug/g ND 74.9 70-122 Boron 55.5 5.0 ug/g ND 105 70-130 Cadmium 47.9 0.5 ug/g ND 95.7 70-130 Chromium (VI) 0.1 0.2 ug/g ND 74.5 70-130 Chromium 63.8 5.0 ug/g 8.5 111 70-130 Cobalt 57.8 1.0 ug/g 2.4 111 70-130 Copper 59.5 5.0 ug/g 7.0 105 70-130 Lead 55.3 1.0 ug/g 7.0 96.5 70-130 Mercury 1.49 0.1 ug/g ND 99.6 70-130 Molybdenum 55.5 1.0 ug/g 1.0 109 70-130 Nickel 61.0 5.0 ug/g 6.2 110 70-130 Selenium 48.7 1.0 ug/g ND 97.0 70-130 Silver 43.5 0.3 ug/g ND 87.1 70-130 Thallium 48.0 1.0 ug/g ND 95.9 70-130 Uranium 48.0 1.0 ug/g ND 95.4 70-130 Vanadium 68.9 10.0 ug/g ND 118 70-130 Zinc 72.3 20.0 ug/g 22.4 99.7 70-130 PCBs PCBs, total 0.492 0.05 ug/g ND 108 60-140 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 27 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgeiioaracellabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Spike Anal to Reporting Source %REC RPD y Result Limit Units Result %REC Limit RPD Limit Notes Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 0.136 % 119 60-140 Semi-Volatiles Acenaphthene 0.125 0.02 ug/g ND 62.1 50-140 Acenaphthylene 0.141 0.02 ug/g ND 70.5 50-140 Anthracene 0.154 0.02 ug/g ND 76.6 50-140 Benzo [a] anthracene 0.134 0.02 ug/g ND 66.8 50-140 Benzo [a] pyrene 0.128 0.02 ug/g ND 63.6 50-140 Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.129 0.02 ug/g ND 64.3 50-140 Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.127 0.02 ug/g ND 63.3 50-140 Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.145 0.02 ug/g ND 72.3 50-140 Chrysene 0.142 0.02 ug/g ND 70.7 50-140 Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene 0.117 0.02 ug/g ND 58.1 50-140 Fluoranthene 0.172 0.02 ug/g ND 85.7 50-140 Fluorene 0.136 0.02 ug/g ND 68.0 50-140 Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.127 0.02 ug/g ND 63.1 50-140 1-Methylnaphthalene 0.126 0.02 ug/g ND 62.9 50-140 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.140 0.02 ug/g ND 70.0 50-140 Naphthalene 0.175 0.01 ug/g ND 87.1 50-140 Phenanthrene 0.153 0.02 ug/g ND 76.0 50-140 Pyrene 0.189 0.02 ug/g ND 94.3 50-140 Surrogate:2-Fluorobiphenyl 1.32 % 82.5 50-140 Surrogate: Terohenyl-d14 1.44 % 89.9 50-140 Volatiles Acetone 12.3 0.50 ug/g ND 123 50-140 Benzene 4.24 0.02 ug/g ND 106 60-130 Bromodichloromethane 4.55 0.05 ug/g ND 114 60-130 Bromoform 3.84 0.05 ug/g ND 96.1 60-130 Bromomethane 4.04 0.05 ug/g ND 101 50-140 Carbon Tetrachloride 4.48 0.05 ug/g ND 112 60-130 Chlorobenzene 4.21 0.05 ug/g ND 105 60-130 Chloroform 4.21 0.05 ug/g ND 105 60-130 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 28 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 lethod Quality Control: Spike anal to Reporting Source %REC RPD y Result Limit Units Result %REC Limit RPD Limit Notes Dibromochloromethane 4.83 0.05 ug/g ND 121 60-130 Dich lorod ifluoromethane 4.21 0.05 ug/g ND 105 50-140 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4.08 0.05 ug/g ND 102 60-130 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 4.15 0.05 ug/g ND 104 60-130 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 4.02 0.05 ug/g ND 100 60-130 1,1-Dichloroethane 4.37 0.05 ug/g ND 109 60-130 1,2-Dichloroethane 4.37 0.05 ug/g ND 109 60-130 1,1-Dichloroethylene 4.87 0.05 ug/g ND 122 60-130 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 4.05 0.05 ug/g ND 101 60-130 trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 4.11 0.05 ug/g ND 103 60-130 1,2-Dichloropropane 4.20 0.05 ug/g ND 105 60-130 cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene 4.57 0.05 ug/g ND 114 60-130 trans- 1,3-Dichloropropylene 4.75 0.05 ug/g ND 119 60-130 Ethylbenzene 4.54 0.05 ug/g ND 114 60-130 Ethylene dibromide (dibromoethane, 1,2-) 4.20 0.05 ug/g ND 105 60-130 Hexane 4.75 0.05 ug/g ND 119 60-130 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 9.95 0.50 ug/g ND 99.5 50-140 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 9.83 0.50 ug/g ND 98.3 50-140 Methyl tert-butyl ether 9.55 0.05 ug/g ND 95.5 50-140 Methylene Chloride 4.57 0.05 ug/g ND 114 60-130 Styrene 4.45 0.05 ug/g ND 111 60-130 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 4.21 0.05 ug/g ND 105 60-130 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 4.30 0.05 ug/g ND 107 60-130 Tetrachloroethylene 4.20 0.05 ug/g ND 105 60-130 Toluene 4.48 0.05 ug/g ND 112 60-130 1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane 4.44 0.05 ug/g ND 111 60-130 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.86 0.05 ug/g ND 96.5 60-130 Trichloroethylene 3.74 0.05 ug/g ND 93.6 60-130 Trichlorofluoromethane 4.78 0.05 ug/g ND 119 50-140 Vinyl chloride 4.46 0.02 ug/g ND 111 50-140 m,p-Xylenes 9.11 0.05 ug/g ND 114 60-130 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 29 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracelIabs,corn PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Spike Anal to Reporting Source %REC RPD y Result Limit Units Result %REC Limit RPD Limit Notes o-Xylene 4.51 0.05 ug/g ND 113 60-130 Surrogate:4-Bromofluorobenzene 7.97 % 99.6 50-140 Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 7.34 % 91.8 50-140 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 8.56 % 107 50-140 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 30 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 PwimaracelIabs.corn PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Qualifier Notes: Sample Qualifiers: QC Qualifiers: Sample Data Revisions: None 2: GC-FID signal did not return to baseline by C50 Applies to Samples: QAQC201 GEN09 Elevated reporting limits due to the nature of the sample matrix. QR-05 Duplicate RPDs higher than normally accepted. Remaining batch QA\QC was acceptable. May be sample effect. OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Project Description: 19181-001 Page 31 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 Paowaracellabs.com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2427237 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 17-Jul-2024 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 4-Jul-2024 Client PO: Work Order Revisions / Comments: REVISION 1 - This report includes additional analysis as per the client. Other Report Notes: n/a: not applicable ND: Not Detected MDL: Method Detection Limit Source Result: Data used as source for matrix and duplicate samples %REC: Percent recovery. RPD: Relative percent difference. INC: Not Calculated Soil results are reported on a dry weight basis unlesss otherwise noted. Where %Solids is reported, moisture loss includes the loss of volatile hydrocarbons. Project Description: 19181-001 CCME PHC additional information: - The method for the analysis of PHCs complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory. All prescribed quality criteria identified in the method has been met. F1 range corrected for BTEX. F2 to F3 ranges corrected for appropriate PAHs where available. The gravimetric heavy hydrocarbons (F4G) are not to be added to C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. In the case where F4 and F4G are both reported, the greater of the two results is to be used for comparison to CWS PHC criteria. - When reported, data for F4G has been processed using a silica gel cleanup. Any use of these results implies your agreement that our total liabilty in connection with this work, however arising, shall be limited to the amount paid by you for this work, and that our employees or agents shall not under any circumstances be liable to you in connection with this work. OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 32 of 34 1-a00-749-1947 PagewaracelIabs,corn Co PARAC E L LABORATORIES LTD: nlieni Name: n Gontect UN: Lava NL7aUL 14 Address�1A &XK s t W 511i N I IIIIIIWhflID: IIIIIIIIIIII IB Te eDnOna; 909 — qq 5Q REG 16=4 ❑ FI G 4W1$ ocher P403 fon Table 1 Res Park ❑ MedrFne ❑ AM 559 ❑ PWW ❑ iahle2 IndrComm ❑ Coarse ❑ CCMF ❑ MISA ❑ Table 3 ❑ AgrMther ❑ SU - Sari ❑ SU-Stmm ❑ Table _ Mul: For FiSC: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Other Sample IUf6ocation Name 2 T -2D}_ 0 6 0, 101-._0 -017 4 TP 0S._ -0. s TP20,;-0.6-a,.9 Pralec� Rel. I �I�i r [:ram+� Uwe 4: ff P6 R: Paracel Order Number (tab Ube only} J'q;�-7c? -7 L4UrcA.fifZ lL�peamb;vM—jr1c-Cor" MwHx : S (Sod S@0 GW {around VVMer) SW ($udace water) SS (5UwrrVSvita-y Sewo P jpaird A (Ai D (fnheo Sample Taken Rate Time i3 )4/07/01 Chain of Custody 4Lab Use Orin N° i44ki Page -1 Oi 1 Turnaround Time fl 1 day ❑ 3 day 2 day Fte{lulai Dale Required: Required Analysis x r Pio5-Or3-,G,S $ T��o� A4y Ot _• � _ 9 rtpI07_ 0.4q-o.& Comments: • a ._.. Jar * art iwlabetd {X5 t �ot4, �r�oll7e►rery. J Chair. of Cus::. 1 Page185 Go' PARACEL II I I II Paraeel Order Number I �I���I� �! II I I li I �I III I� (tab Use Only) Chain of Custody (Lab Use Only} I 1 Ll0 71)SJ1 N2 � gig LABORATORIES LTD. � Ghnl Urne: C f„`yYIUM int. --- PAW1 W. 1'll5 I — M1 page ' 4f I I a�tr Lima � if-Lolefaid ouoleis Turnaround Time AM*wVJ Orock 5t N I W"I .ON PO 7: ❑ 1 day ❑ 3 day I Mal Laur ,'F1krQio��coff ,v7l+IAr--c&� j� 02dap Regular `,J Date Required; - ---- CKSECS ISW ❑ REG 4009 (MW Regulation Matrix IlWe: S (SaWSedb GW [Ground Walerj-- Required Analysis ;, Table 1 2�AeslPark ❑ Me&Fme ❑ PEG 556 n PWQQ SW {Gurlace MIX $S [St9rrU,9Milary SeINW ❑ Table 2 AIndrComm ❑ Cww ❑ CCM€ ❑ MISA P (pant A (wr} O pher) X [3 Table 3 ❑ Ag�ilDlher d sU-Sari ❑ SU-SIM L d ri V Table.. _ Munc� Sample Taken E u =} For R9C: [] Yes No ❑ 91IrPJ u ° Pate Time a M r. U In Ila Sample ID/Location Name i -rF _a2-ag Iqto,7l YX Xx X x nz _ } 3 ACC ai 4 t' AQ C 2-02 s 8 8 e 14 T'r 0616 art m1 loodd x 7ui 1, &vuld be �41� 3, )oLq, Moh0d nl Dek, i A9�inquiShFd B n I1BCd vetl al I .. I. :; ..,;, I it \] � . _. lialinquislred5'1�'�,�1..... l�dMr m. inn P&AU_ .. f'„i - i3 - -)t l [ flahm+Tnr: _ 6tl- j 1 _014 la 00 [777rir v. L�f IV J /V r T.71.111u'2 / { ,.• �i' .. char of Cuslodv :Env ■Is■ Page186 PARA C E L LABORATORIES LTD. Cambium Inc. (Whitby) 223 Brock Street North Whitby, ON L1 N 41\16 Attn: Kelly Lewis Client PO: 19181-001 Project: 19181-001 Custody: 140277 TRUSTED. RESPONSIVE. RELIABLE. Certificate of Analysis This Certificate of Analysis contains analytical data applicable to the following samples as submitted: ParacellD Client ID 2348247-01 TP101 0.2-0.4 2348247-02 TP1 020.2-0.6 2348247-03 TP1 030.2-0.6 2348247-04 QAQC1 Approved By: Milan Ralitsch. PhD Senior Technical Manager Revised Report 1-800-749-1947 www.paracellabs.com Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Order #: 2348247 Page 1 of 15 Page 187 PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Analysis Summary Table Project Description: 19181-001 Analysis Method Reference/Description Extraction Date Analysis Date BTEX by P&T GC -MS EPA 8260 - P&T GC -MS 1-Dec-23 4-Dec-23 Conductivity MOE E3138 - probe @25 °C, water ext 4-Dec-23 4-Dec-23 pH, soil EPA 150.1 - pH probe @ 25 °C, CaCI buffered ext. 27-Dec-23 27-Dec-23 PHC F1 CWS Tier 1 - P&T GC-FID 1-Dec-23 4-Dec-23 PHCs F2 to F4 CWS Tier 1 - GC-FID, extraction 30-Nov-23 4-Dec-23 REG 153: Metals by ICP/MS, soil EPA 6020 - Digestion - ICP-MS 4-Dec-23 4-Dec-23 REG 558 - Cyanide TCLP MOE E3015-Auto Colour 7-Dec-23 7-Dec-23 REG 558 - Fluoride TCLP EPA 340.2 - ISE 8-Dec-23 9-Dec-23 REG 558 - Mercury by CVAA TCLP EPA 7470A, CVAA 7-Dec-23 8-Dec-23 REG 558 - Metals, ICP-MS TCLP EPA 6020 - Digestion - ICP-MS 7-Dec-23 7-Dec-23 REG 558 - NO3/NO2 TCLP EPA 300.1 - IC 7-Dec-23 11-Dec-23 SAR Calculated 4-Dec-23 4-Dec-23 Solids, % CWS Tier 1 - Gravimetric 1-Dec-23 4-Dec-23 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 2 of 15 1-a00-749-1947 Paowaracellabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Summary of Criteria Exceedances (If this page is blank then there are no exceedances) Only those criteria that a sample exceeds will be highlighted in red Regulatory Comparison: Paracel Laboratories has provided regulatory guidelines on this report for informational purposes only and makes no representations or warranties that the data is accurate or reflects the current regulatory values. The user is advised to consult with the appropriate official regulations to evaluate compliance. Sample results that are highlighted have exceeded the selected regulatory limit. Calculated uncertainty estimations have not been applied for determining regulatory exceedances. Project Description: 19181-001 Sample Analyte MDL / Units Result Reg 406/19 -T1 Reg 558 Schedule 4 Res/Park/Ind/Com TP101 0.2-0.4 F4 PHCs (C34-050) 6 ug/g 284 . . TP102 0.2-0.6 Antimony 1.0 ug/g 13.5 . . TP102 0.2-0.6 Lead 1.0 ug/g 277 0 . . TP102 0.2-0.6 Zinc 20.0 ug/g 475 . . TP102 0.2-0.6 F4 PHCs (C34-050) 6 ug/g 132 . . TP103 0.2-0.6 Antimony 1.0 ug/g 27.5 . . TP103 0.2-0.6 Barium 1.0 ug/g 245 . . TP103 0.2-0.6 Lead 1.0 ug/g 216 . . TP103 0.2-0.6 Zinc 20.0 ug/g 469 . . QAQC1 Antimony 1.0 ug/g 4.5 .. QAQC1 Lead 1.0 ug/g 361 .. QAQC1 Zinc 20.0 ug/g 387 . . OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 3 of 15 1-a100-749-1947 pAgenoaracelIabs.com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Project Description: 19181-001 TP101 0.2-0.4 TP102 0.2-0.6 TP103 0.2-0.6 QAQC1 Criteria: 27-Nov-23 09:00 27-Nov-23 09:00 27-Nov-23 09:00 27-Nov-23 09:00 Reg 406/19 -T1 Reg 558 Schedule 4 2348247-01 2348247-02 2348247-03 2348247-04 Res/Park/Ind/Com Soil Soil Soil Soil Physical Characteristics % Solids 1 0.1 % by Wt. 93.0 87.6 87.2 87.3 EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate Inorganics Fluoride 0.05 mg/L 0.20 150 mg/L Nitrate as N 1 mg/L <1 1000 mg/L Nitrite as N 1 mg/L <1 1000 mg/L Cyanide, free 0.02 mg/L <0.02 20 mg/L EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate Metals Arsenic 0.05 mg/L <0.05 2.5 mg/L Barium 0.05 mg/L 1.45 100 mg/L Boron 0.05 mg/L 0.05 500 mg/L Cadmium 0.01 mg/L 0.01 0.5 mg/L Chromium 0.05 mg/L <0.05 5 mg/L Lead 0.05 mg/L 0.11 5 mg/L Mercury 0.005 mg/L <0.005 0.1 mg/L Selenium 0.05 mg/L <0.05 1 mg/L Silver 0.05 mg/L <0.05 5 mg/L Uranium 0.05 mg/L <0.05 10 mg/L General Inorganics SAR 0.01 N/A 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.08 2.4 N/A Conductivity 5 uS/cm 151 147 138 139 0.57 mS/cm pH 0.05 pH Units 7.54 j11 7.47 j11 7.41 [11 7.38 [11 5.00 - 9.00 pH Units Metals Antimony 1.0 ug/g <1.0 1.3 ug/g Arsenic 1.0 ug/g 2.9 8.1 8.8 8.4 18 ug/g Barium 1.0 ug/g 42.6 168 155 220 ug/g OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 4 of 15 1-800-749-1947 Pagd,W"'cellabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Metals Project Description: 19181-001 TP101 0.2-0.4 TP102 0.2-0.6 TP103 0.2-0.6 QAQC1 Criteria: 27-Nov-23 09:00 27-Nov-23 09:00 27-Nov-23 09:00 27-Nov-23 09:00 Reg 406/19 -T1 Reg 558 Schedule 4 2348247-01 2348247-02 2348247-03 2348247-04 Res/Park/Ind/Com Soil Soil Soil Soil Beryllium 0.5 ug/g <0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 2.5 ug/g Boron 5.0 ug/g 8.0 8.8 9.2 9.1 36 ug/g Cadmium 0.5 ug/g <0.5 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.2 ug/g Chromium 5.0 ug/g 26.3 22.3 24.5 23.1 70 ug/g Cobalt 1.0 ug/g 5.7 5.9 6.6 6.3 21 ug/g Copper 5.0 ug/g 15.2 61.8 77.1 50.5 92 ug/g Lead 1.0 ug/g 10.9 120 ug/g Molybdenum 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2 ug/g Nickel 5.0 ug/g 8.6 13.3 14.7 13.9 82 ug/g Selenium 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.5 ug/g Silver 0.3 ug/g <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.5 ug/g Thallium 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1 ug/g Uranium 1.0 ug/g <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.5 ug/g Vanadium 10.0 ug/g 34.7 28.9 31.2 30.9 86 ug/g Zinc 20.0 ug/g 55.4 290 ug/g Volatiles Benzene 0.02 ug/g <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 ug/g Ethylbenzene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 ug/g Toluene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.2 ug/g m,p-Xylenes 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 o-Xylene 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Xylenes, total 0.05 ug/g <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 1 0.05 ug/g Toluene-d8 Surrogate 109% 109% 109% 108% 1 - - Hydrocarbons F1 PHCs (C6-C10) 7 ug/g <7 <7 <7 <7 25 ug/g OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 5 of 15 1-a00-749-1947 pAgeimaracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Client ID: Sample Date: Sample ID: Matrix: MDL/Units Hydrocarbons Project Description: 19181-001 TP101 0.2-0.4 TP102 0.2-0.6 TP103 0.2-0.6 QAQC1 Criteria: 27-Nov-23 09:00 27-Nov-23 09:00 27-Nov-23 09:00 27-Nov-23 09:00 Reg 406/19 -T1 Reg 558 Schedule 4 2348247-01 2348247-02 2348247-03 2348247-04 Res/Park/Ind/Com Soil Soil Soil Soil F2 PHCs (C10-C16) 4 ug/g <4 <4 <4 <4 10 ug/g F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 8 ug/g 100 167 45 74 240 ug/g F4 PHCs (C34-050) 6 ug/g <6 82 120 ug/g OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 6 of 15 1-a00-749-1947 Pageimaracellabs.com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Blank F lyte Result Reporting Units %REC %REC RPD RPD Notes Limit Limit Limit EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate Inorganics Fluoride ND 0.05 mg/L Nitrate as N ND 1 mg/L Nitrite as N ND 1 mg/L Cyanide, free ND 0.02 mg/L EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate Metals Arsenic ND 0.05 mg/L Barium ND 0.05 mg/L Boron ND 0.05 mg/L Cadmium ND 0.01 mg/L Chromium ND 0.05 mg/L Lead ND 0.05 mg/L Mercury ND 0.005 mg/L Selenium ND 0.05 mg/L Silver ND 0.05 mg/L Uranium ND 0.05 mg/L General Inorganics SAR ND 0.01 N/A Conductivity ND 5 us/cm Hydrocarbons F1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 7 ug/g F2 PHCs (C10-C16) ND 4 ug/g F3 PHCs (C16-C34) ND 8 ug/g F4 PHCs (C34-050) ND 6 ug/g Metals Antimony ND 1.0 ug/g Arsenic ND 1.0 ug/g Barium ND 1.0 ug/g Beryllium ND 0.5 ug/g Boron ND 5.0 ug/g Cadmium ND 0.5 ug/g Chromium ND 5.0 ug/g Cobalt ND 1.0 ug/g OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 7 of 15 1-800-749-1947 Pagd,W"'cellabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Blank Analyte Result Reporting Units %REC %REC RPD RPD Notes Limit Limit Limit Copper ND 5.0 ug/g Lead ND 1.0 ug/g Molybdenum ND 1.0 ug/g Nickel ND 5.0 ug/g Selenium ND 1.0 ug/g Silver ND 0.3 ug/g Thallium ND 1.0 ug/g Uranium ND 1.0 ug/g Vanadium ND 10.0 ug/g Zinc ND 20.0 ug/g Volatiles Benzene ND 0.02 ug/g Ethylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/g Toluene ND 0.05 ug/g m,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/g o-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/g Xylenes, total ND 0.05 ug/g Surrogate: Toluene-d8 8.47 % 105 50-140 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 8 of 15 1-a00-749-1947 Pagdiim'aracelIabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Duplicate Reporting Source o /D%REC RPD Analyte Result Units REG RPD Notes Limit Result Limit Limit EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate Inorganics Fluoride 0.36 0.05 mg/L 0.36 1.7 20 Nitrate as N ND 1 mg/L ND NC 20 Nitrite as N ND 1 mg/L ND NC 20 Cyanide, free ND 0.02 mg/L ND NC 20 EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate Metals Arsenic ND 0.05 mg/L ND NC 29 Barium 0.241 0.05 mg/L 0.237 1.5 34 Boron ND 0.05 mg/L ND NC 33 Cadmium ND 0.01 mg/L ND NC 33 Chromium ND 0.05 mg/L ND NC 32 Lead ND 0.05 mg/L ND NC 32 Mercury ND 0.005 mg/L ND NC 30 Selenium ND 0.05 mg/L ND NC 28 Silver ND 0.05 mg/L ND NC 28 Uranium ND 0.05 mg/L ND NC 27 General Inorganics SAR 0.09 0.01 N/A 0.09 0.0 30 Conductivity 149 5 us/cm 151 1.7 5 pH 8.41 0.05 pH Units 8.38 0.4 10 Hydrocarbons F1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 7 ug/g ND NC 40 F2 PHCs (C10-C16) ND 4 ug/g ND NC 30 F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 37 8 ug/g 41 10.5 30 F4 PHCs (C34-050) ND 6 ug/g ND NC 30 Metals Antimony ND 1.0 ug/g ND NC 30 Arsenic 11.3 1.0 ug/g 11.1 1.6 30 Barium 122 1.0 ug/g 117 4.0 30 Beryllium 1.3 0.5 ug/g 1.1 23.6 30 Boron 22.8 5.0 ug/g 18.1 22.5 30 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 9 of 15 1-800-749-1947 Pagd'IMar,cellabs.conn PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Duplicate Reporting Source o /o%REC RPD Analyte Result Units REC RPD Notes Limit Result Limit Limit Cadmium ND 0.5 ug/g ND NC 30 Chromium 32.6 5.0 ug/g 30.9 5.4 30 Cobalt 13.7 1.0 ug/g 13.6 0.2 30 Copper 28.1 5.0 ug/g 28.1 0.2 30 Lead 25.0 1.0 ug/g 18.6 29.3 30 Molybdenum ND 1.0 ug/g 3.7 NC 30 Nickel 35.9 5.0 ug/g 35.1 2.1 30 Selenium ND 1.0 ug/g ND NC 30 Silver ND 0.3 ug/g ND NC 30 Thallium ND 1.0 ug/g ND NC 30 Uranium ND 1.0 ug/g ND NC 30 Vanadium 45.5 10.0 ug/g 42.6 6.6 30 Zinc 82.0 20.0 ug/g 81.9 0.1 30 Physical Characteristics % Solids 79.9 0.1 % by Wt. 79.5 0.5 25 Volatiles Benzene ND 0.02 ug/g ND NC 50 Ethylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Toluene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 m,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 o-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/g ND NC 50 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 9.27 % 107 50-140 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL 1-800-749-1947 Pagd,W"'cellabs,corn Page 10 of 15 PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Spike Anal to Reporting Source %REC RPD y Result Limit Units Result %REC Limit RPD Limit Notes EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate Inorganics Fluoride 0.86 0.05 mg/L 0.36 99.8 70-130 Nitrate as N 10 1 mg/L ND 96.1 80-120 Nitrite as N 9 1 mg/L ND 94.4 80-120 Cyanide, free 0.100 0.02 mg/L ND 99.7 60-136 EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate Metals Arsenic 0.522 0.05 mg/L ND 104 83-119 Barium 0.761 0.05 mg/L 0.237 105 83-116 Boron 0.538 0.05 mg/L ND 108 71-128 Cadmium 0.503 0.01 mg/L ND 101 78-119 Chromium 0.546 0.05 mg/L ND 109 80-124 Lead 0.495 0.05 mg/L ND 99.1 77-126 Mercury 0.0331 0.005 mg/L ND 110 70-130 Selenium 0.542 0.05 mg/L ND 108 81-125 Silver 0.490 0.05 mg/L ND 98.0 70-128 Uranium 0.543 0.05 mg/L ND 109 70-131 Hydrocarbons F1 PHCs (C6-C10) 65 7 ug/g ND 91.3 80-120 F2 PHCs (C10-C16) 101 4 ug/g ND 97.9 60-140 F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 235 8 ug/g 41 83.4 60-140 F4 PHCs (C34-050) 173 6 ug/g ND 104 60-140 Metals Antimony 58.1 1.0 ug/g ND 116 70-130 Arsenic 64.6 1.0 ug/g 4.4 120 70-130 Barium 107 1.0 ug/g 46.9 119 70-130 Beryllium 55.8 0.5 ug/g ND 111 70-130 Boron 61.4 5.0 ug/g 7.3 108 70-130 Cadmium 58.4 0.5 ug/g ND 117 70-130 Chromium 72.9 5.0 ug/g 12.3 121 70-130 Cobalt 61.4 1.0 ug/g 5.5 112 70-130 Copper 68.5 5.0 ug/g 11.2 115 70-130 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 11 of 15 1-a00-749-1947 pAgewaracellabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Project Description: 19181-001 Method Quality Control: Spike Anal to Reporting Source %REC RPD y Result Limit Units Result %REC Limit RPD Limit Notes Lead 62.6 1.0 ug/g 7.4 110 70-130 Molybdenum 63.0 1.0 ug/g 1.5 123 70-130 Nickel 71.7 5.0 ug/g 14.1 115 70-130 Selenium 60.6 1.0 ug/g ND 120 70-130 Silver 50.4 0.3 ug/g ND 101 70-130 Thallium 59.0 1.0 ug/g ND 118 70-130 Uranium 60.6 1.0 ug/g ND 121 70-130 Vanadium 74.4 10.0 ug/g 17.0 115 70-130 Zinc 91.5 20.0 ug/g 32.8 117 70-130 Volatiles Benzene 3.78 0.02 ug/g ND 94.0 60-130 Ethylbenzene 3.82 0.05 ug/g ND 94.9 60-130 Toluene 4.60 0.05 ug/g ND 115 60-130 m,p-Xylenes 7.63 0.05 ug/g ND 95.2 60-130 o-Xylene 3.86 0.05 ug/g ND 96.0 60-130 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 8.16 % 102 50-140 OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 12 of 15 1-800-749-1947 Pagd,W"'cellabs,com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Qualifier Notes: Sample Qualifiers: Sample Data Revisions: None 1: Holding time had been exceeded upon receipt of the sample at the laboratory or prior to the analysis being requested. OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Project Description: 19181-001 Page 13 of 15 1-800-749-1947 Pagd,W"'cellabs.com PoPA RAC E L Order #: 2348247 Certificate of Analysis Report Date: 29-Dec-2023 Client: Cambium Inc. (Whitby) Order Date: 29-Nov-2023 Client PO: 19181-001 Work Order Revisions / Comments: Revision-1: This report includes an updated parameter list, as per client. Revision-2: This report includes an updated parameter list, as per client. Other Report Notes: n/a: not applicable ND: Not Detected MDL: Method Detection Limit Source Result: Data used as source for matrix and duplicate samples %REC: Percent recovery. RPD: Relative percent difference. NC: Not Calculated Soil results are reported on a dry weight basis unlesss otherwise noted. Where %Solids is reported, moisture loss includes the loss of volatile hydrocarbons. CCME PHC additional information: Project Description: 19181-001 - The method for the analysis of PHCs complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory. All prescribed quality criteria identified in the method has been met. F1 range corrected for BTEX. F2 to F3 ranges corrected for appropriate PAHs where available. The gravimetric heavy hydrocarbons (F4G) are not to be added to C6 to C50 hydrocarbons. In the case where F4 and F4G are both reported, the greater of the two results is to be used for comparison to CWS PHC criteria. - When reported, data for F4G has been processed using a silica gel cleanup. Any use of these results implies your agreement that our total liabilty in connection with this work, however arising, shall be limited to the amount paid by you for this work, and that our employees or agents shall not under any circumstances be liable to you in connection with this work. OTTAWA - MISSISSAUGA - HAMILTON - KINGSTON - LONDON - NIAGARA - WINDSOR - RICHMOND HILL Page 14 of 15 1-a00-749-1947 p6gdinloaracelIabs,com OoPARACEL r8T$M rD'2348�d7 �elQrderf4um4 jEab lJse III11II1I1111111111 Onl1+j LABORATORIES LTD, 7 aiPnl Name: fn u 1. l PrOlect ♦m. 1 V l Conran N,.me; Y%6l Lej.,)l s Weg; Address. l qs.44 4-4p4q Sfrt4l f e63� Poi: ill -oat E�NII: Q ,5wW RWO4uall4 OtherRegulatiOn Ta61r t p Regpafk ❑ MedlFier d xEa sag ❑ PwoD Matri>tTypp: S(Sailj$p,l.[ GW[Q,r4ur+d Wdl4r} 5W( Surface Warerj $$�StorMj-Sanitary Sevxrj ❑ Tahk,7 IXindjC—In Q Caark, d [ ❑ P (Rahilj Alibr4 0 [outer[ Chain Of Custody (lab Use amfj N2 140277 Page I or -L TurnWGund Tinne 0 1 day d 3 day 2 Uav .S Regular Saxe Required: Requked Anak$e5 [MF MISA 6 — Cl AgrVi)i her ❑ sU-Sorri Q Sll-Storer F � IL El Murr: L .. 3 Sample Taken It LL ( Y ForR$C;d Yes [] Nv ❑ 6rrM+: ° x V �{1� "��; u! ¢_ Sample IF]/Location Name Time _ 5 a 5 = a q 2 'fP t0Z (). Z --0 - � cynmce, s L1� }}�'' — V � f'I`Li 1lr� J 's.thotlofkr rn.... I J IS'8 ece ved iW L7.iverl�ePm' "le rrd Al lao� i7r fP'iVAr, !1:21*S 7MV~eijoUatelF'rx' [� ��S �atefTime' {� �}r remperatu" ierperE—o 3 Q mul l Yerr6ed: ❑ C!4n of Cut`5& IEio x'sx Be: Page 201 Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP101-23 Contractor: Method: DCPT Testing Page: 1 of 1 Z r Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 116.75 mASL Date CompletedNovember 27, 2023 CAMBIUM Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865869 E: 684435 Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLO Shear Strength Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa n V. PI ra V. 21 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 % Moisture — SPT (N) O > Q OT 0 E n U Z F Well w o J Description o�01>� z o Installation Log Notes Depth can 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 116.8 0 6 15 TOPSOIL: —150 mm thick 1 DCPT 15 • 2 DCPT 19 116.6 19 • 0.15 FILL: (SP/GP) SAND and GRAVEL; brown (FILL); 4 6% 19 ® 1' Testpit open and dry 3 DCPT 19 4 DCPT 17 x/ / non -cohesive, moist, compact P ns.a� p upon completion of P P as, ,7 testing. jj/// /j%/ FILL: (SP) Gravelly SAND, 0.38 trace silt, trace clay; brown 5 — DCPT 17 116.2 0.5 0 ,z (FILL);non-cohesive, moist, compact to dense 116.14 6 DCPT 12 1L 061 1 DCPT 12 p Borehole terminated @ 0.6 mbgs ,> 8 DCPT 12 due to SPT refusal encountered. 9 DCPT 22 ©`. 115.8 1 ©,-, 10 DCPT 29 115.2 1.5 114.8 2 114.2 2.5 113.8 3 113.2 3.5 112.8 GRAINSIZE LE EL SLD S LT CLAY 1 m = 45 units DISTRIBUTION Logged By: EC Input By: EC Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Ottawa Page 202 Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP102-23 Contractor: Method: DCPT Testing Page: 1 of 1 Z r Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 117.25 mASL Date CompletedNovember 27, 2023 CAMBIUM Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865909 E: 684430 Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLO Shear Strength Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa n V. PI ra V. 21 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 % Moisture — SPT (N) O ' OT 0 E 4) U Z F Well w o J Description Elevation z o Installation Log Notes Depth can 25 50 75 20406080 117.2 0 24.5% 7 TOPSOIL: —130 mm thick 1n.1z 1 DCPT 7 • 13.3% 10 • 13 jjjjj // jj . 0.13 FILL: (ML) Sandy SILT; brown 2 DCPT 10 3 DCPT 13 �j%j j�j /j�jjj/ (FILL), trace debris; • • non -cohesive, moist. compact to dense 16 • 4 DCPT 16 /jjjj�/j 5 DCPT 31 116.8 0.5 //%% jjj� jj jjjj •31 63 6 DCPT 63 j* 11664 • Testpit open and dry Borehole terminated @ 0.6 mb s o.61 g upon completion of testing. due to target depth achieved. 116.2 1 115.8 1.5 115.2 2 114.8 2.5 114.2 3 113.8 3.5 113.2 GRAINSIZE I SAMPLE I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT I CLAY 1m=46.nb DISTRIBUTION Logged By: EC Input By: EC Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Ottawa Page 203 Q Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP103-23 Contractor: Method: DCPT Testing Page: 1 of 1 Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 116.8 mASL Date CompletedNovember 27, 2023 ..... . Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865952 E: 684459 CAMBIUM Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLO!1� Shear Strength Limits (%) PLy Cu, kPa v, PI (� "t re V. 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 --- 0 0 'o z > o E (D ro of % Moisture SPT (N) Well E a w Description °eNOtb" °L � a Installation Log Notes u w o Depth z 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 116.8 0 21.9i 10 TOPSOIL: -150 mm thick 1 DCPT 10 • • 2 DCPT 16 116.65 16 • (MIL) sandy SILT: (ML) Sandy c 15 SILT, trace gravel, trace clay; ai •zs 3 DCPT 25 7 brown; non -cohesive, moist, 4 DCPT 25 z5 • dense zs 5 DCPT 25 116.30.5 • Testpit open and dry upon completion of 1610 testing. Borehole terminated @ 0.6 mbgs o.61 due to SPT refusal encountered. 115.8t II 1 115.3t II 1.5 114.8t2 II 114.3 2.5 t 113.8 3 t 113.3 3.5 112.8 GRAINSIZE SAMPLE GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY 45 ne DISTRIBUTION Logged By: EC Input By: EC Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Ottawa Page 204 Q Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP201-24 Contractor: Nexxgen Environmental Method: Track Mounted Excavator Page: 1 of 1 Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 0.00 Date Completed: 03/07/2024 ..... . Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4866001 E: 684433 CAMBIUM Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLC) Shear Strength Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa 1-- D— PI "t v, re , L' U 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 a)o ___ SPT (N) / o a� cL n o z w a o o > tY F % Moisture DCPT Well o w Description D"N°tb" = a > O o o Installation Log Notes w o _j Depth z � U to 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 oTo TOPSOIL: -0,15 1 GB (SM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand, 0.15 trace gravel; grey, trace brick, trace wood, trace garbage, no staining, no odour; moist 2 GB 0.5 I 0.5 II_ -0,61 TP201 _0.6-0.8: ISM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand; M1 8 GB grey, trace garbage, no staining, BTEX, PHCs, VOCs, no odour; moist -o 76 PAHs, PCBs, Metals, ORPs o" Borehole terminated @ 0.8 mbgs due to target depth achieved. -1 1 -1.5 1.5 -2 2 -2.5 2.5 -3 3 -3.5 3.5 -4 GRAINSIZE I SAMPLE I GRAVEL I SAND SILT CLAY DISTRIBUTION Logged By: EA Input By: SI Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Whitby Page 205 Q Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP202-24 Contractor: Nexxgen Environmental Method: Track Mounted Excavator Page: 1 of 1 Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 0.00 Date Completed: 03/07/2024 ..... . Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865977 E: 684383 CAMBIUM Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLp Shear Strength Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa D— PI n"t v, re V. L' U 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 m o ___ SPT (N) / o a� cL n $ z a o a: > Of F % Moisture DCPT Well o w � Description D"N°tb" = z a � U > O o a � Installation Log Notes w Depth 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 OT0 TOPSOIL: ISM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand; light brown, trace organics, no no odour; moist -0.5t IIstain, 0.5 II -0 76 Borehole terminated @ 0.8 mbgs 0,76 due to target depth achieved. 2 -2.5+ 2.5 3 -3.5+ 3.5 Logged By: EA Input By: SI 2 1 GB TP202_0.5-0.7: BTEX, PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, Metals, ORPs GRAINSIZE I SAMPLE I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT I CLAY DISTRIBUTION Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Whitby Page 206 Q Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP203-24 Contractor: Nexxgen Environmental Method: Track Mounted Excavator Page: 1 of 1 Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 0.00 Date Completed: 03/07/2024 ..... . Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865943 E: 684389 CAMBIUM Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLC) Shear Strength Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa 1-- D— PI "t v, re , L' U 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 a)o ___ SPT (N) / o a� cL n o z ro a o o > a)F % Moisture DCPT Well o w D Description "N°tb" = a > o o Installation Log Notes w o _j Depth z � U O � 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 oTo TOPSOIL: -0,15 1 GB (SM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand; o.15 light brown, trace garbage, no 7-. staining, no odour; moist 2 GB _�.5 0.5 TP203_0.4-0.6: BTEX, PHCs, VOCs, -- -os1 PAHs, PCBs, Metals, (MIL) ) SILT: Silt; grey, trace 3 GB ORPs garbage, minor black stain, TP203_0.6-0.8: manure odour; moist -o 74 BTEX, PHCs, VOCs, 0,74 PAHs, PCBs, Metals, ORPs -1 1 -1.5 1.5 -2 2 -2.5 2.5 -3 3 -3.5 3.5 -4 GRAINSIZE I SAMPLE I GRAVEL I SAND SILT CLAY DISTRIBUTION Logged By: EA Input By: SI Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Whitby Page 207 Q Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP204-24 Contractor: Nexxgen Environmental Method: Track Mounted Excavator Page: 1 of 1 Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 0.00 Date Completed: 03/07/2024 ..... . Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865957 E: 684426 CAMBIUM Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLp Shear Strength Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa 1--PI D— "t v, re V. L' U 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 m o ___ SPT (N) / o a� cL n $ z a o a: > Of F % Moisture DCPT Well o w � Description D"N°tb" = z a � U > O o o � Installation Log Notes w Depth 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 OT0 TOPSOIL: ISM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand; s 10 light brown, no staining, no 2 GB odour; moist -0,30 0,30 (SM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand; 3 GB light grey, trace garbage, no -0.5 0.5 staining, no odour; moist -0A ISM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand; 0.as grey, trace garbage, black stain, 4 GB hydrocarbon odour; moist 0 7s Borehole terminated @ 0.8 mbgs 0,76 due to target depth achieved. -1.5+ 1.5 2 -2.5+2.5 3 -3.5+3.5 Logged By: EA Input By: SI TP204_0.5-0.7: BTEX, PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, Metals, ORPs GRAINSIZE I SAMPLE I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT I CLAY DISTRIBUTION Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Whitby Page 208 Q Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP205-24 Contractor: Nexxgen Environmental Method: Track Mounted Excavator Page: 1 of 1 Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 0.00 Date Completed: 03/07/2024 ..... . Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865920 E: 684408 CAMBIUM Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLp Shear Strength Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa D— PI n"t v, re V. L' U 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 m o ___ SPT (N) / o a� cL n $ z a o a: > Of F % Moisture DCPT Well o w � Description D"N°tb" = z a h U > O o a � Installation Log Notes w Depth 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 OT0 TOPSOIL: o.is 1 GB ISM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand; 0,15 light brown, trace organics, no staining, no odour; moist 2 GB -0.5t 0.5 II_ ISM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand; -os1 M1 3 GB light brown to grey, trace organics, no staining, no odour; moist Borehole terminated @ 0.7 mbgs o.ss 1 1 due to target depth achieved. 2 -2.5+ 2.5 3 -3.5+ 3.5 Logged By: EA Input By: SI TP205_0.3-0.5: BTEX, PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, Metals, ORPs GRAINSIZE I SAMPLE I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT I CLAY DISTRIBUTION Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Whitby Page 209 Q Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP206-24 Contractor: Nexxgen Environmental Method: Track Mounted Excavator Page: 1 of 1 Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 0.00 Date Completed: 03/07/2024 ..... . Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865943 E: 684441 CAMBIUM Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLO Shear Strength C T O O > O w o OTO -0.5 0.5 -1 1 -1.5 1.5 -2 2 -2.5 2.5 -3 3 -3.5 + 3.5 -4 4 -4.5 4.5 -5 L -5.5 5.5 -6 6 -6.5 , 6.5 -7.5 Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa 1--PI CL "t v, 'e , 0 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 a� cL n $ z SPT (N) / Q) > ' Of F % Moisture DCPT Well Description °sN°tb" cL U) > o a Installation Log Notes Depth z h U O to 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 TOPSOIL: 1 GB -0.30 (SM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand; 0,30 light brown, trace organics, no 3 GB staining, no odour; moist -0.38 ISM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand; o.3s grey, trace garbage, trace organics, no staining, no odour; moist -0,6 Borehole terminated @ 0.7 mbgs 0.00 due to target depth achieved. Logged By: EA Input By: SI TP206_0.4-0.6: BTEX, PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, Metals, ORPs GRAINSIZE I SAMPLE I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT I CLAY DISTRIBUTION Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Whitby Page 210 Q Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP207-24 Contractor: Nexxgen Environmental Method: Track Mounted Excavator Page: 1 of 1 Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 0.00 Date Completed: 03/07/2024 ..... . Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865921 E: 684430 CAMBIUM Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLp Shear Strength Limits (%) rL� Cu, kPa D- PI n"t v, re v. L' U 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 m o ___ SPT (N) / o a� n n ° z a o a: > Of F % Moisture DCPT Well o w � Description °sN°tb" = z a I— U > O o a � Installation Log Notes Lu Depth 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 OTO (SW) SAND: Sand, some silt, trace gravel; dark brown, trace organics, trace garbage, no staining, no odour; moist II -0.5t 0.5 II I 0 7s Borehole terminated @ 0.8 mbgs 0,76 due to target depth achieved. 2 -2.5+ 2.5 3 -3.5+ 3.5 Logged By: EA Input By: SI 1 1 GB TP207_0.4-0.6: BTEX, PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, Metals, ORPs GRAINSIZE I SAMPLE I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT I CLAY DISTRIBUTION Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Whitby Page 211 Q Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP208-24 Contractor: Nexxgen Environmental Method: Track Mounted Excavator Page: 1 of 1 Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 0.00 Date Completed: 03/07/2024 ..... . Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865961 E: 684405 CAMBIUM Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLC) Shear Strength Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa 1-- D— PI "t v, re , L' U 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 a)o ___ SPT (N) / o a� cL n o z ro a o o > a)F % Moisture DCPT Well o w o w D Description "N°tb" = z a � U > O o o to Installation Log Notes _j Depth 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 oTo 1 GB TOPSOIL: -o.ia ISM) SILTY SAND: Silty Sand; c'ln light brown, trace organics, TP208_0.2-0.4: trace garbage, no staining, no BTEX, PHCs, VOCs, ' odour, moist 2 GB PAHs, PCBs, Metals, ORPs I TP208_0.4-0.6: 0.5 0,5 osi PAHs, PCBs, Metals, ORPs Borehole terminated @ 0.6 mbgs 0,61 due to target depth achieved. 1 II 11 -1.5 I II 1.5 -2 I II 2 -2.5 I II 2.5 -3 I II 3 -3.5 I II 3.5 -4 GRAINSIZE I SAMPLE I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT I CLAY DISTRIBUTION Logged By: EA Input By: SI Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Whitby Page 212 Q Municipality of Client: Clarington Project Name: North Bowmanville Dog Park Log of Test Pit: TP209-24 Contractor: Nexxgen Environmental Method: Track Mounted Excavator Page: 1 of 1 Project No.: 19181-001 Elevation: 0.00 Date Completed: 03/07/2024 ..... . Location: Longworth Avenue, UTM: 17T N: 4865982 E: 684445 CAMBIUM Clarington ON LOB 1JO SUBSURFACE PROFILE SAMPLE Atterberg LLC) Shear Strength Limits (%) PL� Cu, kPa 1-- D— PI "t v, re , L' U 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 a)o ___ SPT (N) / o a� CL n o z a) a o > F %Moisture DCPT Well o o w Do Description "N°tb" = z a h U > O o D to Installation Log Notes Lu _j Depth 25 50 75 20 40 60 80 oTo TOPSOIL: -0,15 1 GB (SC) CLAYEY SAND: Clayey o.15 Sand; dark brown to grey, trace • organics, trace brick; no staining, no odour; moist 2 GB -0.5 0.5 -°.61 Borehole terminated @ 0.6 mbgs o.s1 due to target depth achieved. -1 1 -1.5 1.5 -2 2 -2.5 2.5 -3 3 -3.5 3.5 -4 GRAINSIZE I SAMPLE I GRAVEL I SAND SILT CLAY DISTRIBUTION Logged By: EA Input By: SI Peterborough, Barrie, Oshawa, Kingston, Whitby Page 213 Attachment 3 to PDS-047-24 CAMBIUM CAMBIUM INC. 866.217.7900 cambium-inc.com Screening Level Risk Assessment North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario August 20, 2024 Prepared for: Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 CAMBIUM Screening Level Risk Assessment — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 August 20, 2024 Executive Summary The Municipality of Clarington (Client) retained Cambium Inc. (Cambium) to complete a Screening Level Risk Assessment (SLRA) for the proposed North Bowmanville Dog Park at the intersection of Longworth Avenue and Bowmanville Avenue in Bowmanville, Ontario (Site). The Site is currently undeveloped but is it understood that the former use of the Site was industrial as a landfill. The SLRA was completed using a screening level approach, in general accordance with Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) 153/04. Cambium understands that the SLRA was completed to support the future development of the property as a dog park with a parking lot. It is noted that the former use of the Site was industrial as a Landfill, which is currently closed. Two Certificates of Approval (A311605 and A390307) exist for the Site, which include the closure of the landfill; therefore, it is anticipated a Record of Site Condition (RSC) will not be required to support a change of land use as per Part IV, Paragraph 13 (3) of O.Reg 153/04. It is noted that the SLRA will not be suitable for submission to the Ministry for the purpose of filing an RSC, if an RSC is required for future property use. Environmental investigations were completed by Cambium in 2023 and 2024, providing information relied upon in the completion of the SLRA. Existing data for the Site only includes surface soil samples as the previous investigations at the Site were completed in support of excess soil characterization of surficial material that would be removed from Site during the development of the proposed dog park and parking lot. As such, the SLRA only assessed on - site risk via exposure to COCs in surficial soil at the Site. Exposure pathways associated with groundwater (on -site and off -site) and surface water (off -site) were not evaluated. As such, this is a scoped SLRA. Previous investigations completed by Cambium identified exceedances of appropriate criteria for petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs), metals, hydride -forming metals, electrical conductivity (EC), and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). As such, Cambium completed a SLRA to evaluate the potential adverse effects associated with exposure to identified on -site contaminants of concern (COCs) in soil and groundwater, for both human health and the environment. Cambium Inc. Page zi b Page i Screening Level Risk Assessment — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 CAMBIUM M August 20, 2024 Cambium completed the SLRA for anticipated future parkland use as a dog park. It is noted that the SLRA was completed with a screening level approach and does not meet the requirements of O.Reg. 153/04. A risk assessment completed in accordance with O.Reg. 153/04 may have separate conclusions regarding on and off -site risks and/or required Risk Management Measures (RMMs). The Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) identified potential unacceptable risk for the following human receptors in a commercial and community land use scenario: • Visitors exposed to COCs via direct contact with soil. Risk management in the form of a hard or fill cap is required in the future parking lot area. • Given the age of the landfill that formerly operated at the Site (closed in 1982) and the lack of subsurface (<1.5 m below ground surface (bgs)) soil characterization completed at the Site, the potential for unacceptable risk exists for intrusive activities at a depth greater than the maximum depth of the investigation (0.8 mbgs). In addition, groundwater characteristics (depth and quality) at the Site are not well understood, as such, potential for unacceptable risk exists for contact with shallow groundwater during intrusive activities. Lastly, as the landfill could be producing methane gas that is not currently monitored, there is potential for unacceptable risk associated with methane gas production. A Health and Safety Plan (HASP), prepared by a Qualified Person, is required for subsurface investigation that involves the excavation of a trench that is deeper than it is wide to mitigate exposure via direct contact and particulate inhalation of soil, incidental ingestion and dermal contact with pooled groundwater within an excavation trench, or inhalation of trench air during intrusive activities. The HASP should include the use of auxiliary fans, or equivalent, in an excavation trench to increase the air exchange rate with an excavation trench while subsurface workers are conducting ground -intrusive activities. Where mechanical ventilation within an excavation trench is impracticable or unfeasible, half face respirators for organic vapours are required. The Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) identified potential unacceptable risks for the following ecological receptors: • Plants and soil organisms exposed to COCs via direct and indirect contact with soil. Risk management in the form of a hard or fill cap is required in the future parking lot area and in Cambium Inc. Page 216 Page ii Screening Level Risk Assessment — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 CAMBIUM M August 20, 2024 the vicinity of TP203-24, which is delineated by TP202-24 to the north, TP208-24 to the east, and TP205-24 to the south. • Mammals and birds exposed to COCs via direct and indirect contact with soil. Risk management in the form of a hard or fill cap is required in the future parking lot area. Cambium Inc. Flage 211 Page iii Screening Level Risk Assessment — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 CAMBIUM August 20, 2024 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................1 1.1 Property Information....................................................................................................1 1.2 Review of Existing Reports..........................................................................................2 1.3 Objectives....................................................................................................................5 1.4 Risk Assessment Assumptions................................................................................... 5 2.0 Contaminants of Concern...............................................................................6 2.1 Applicable Standards for Risk Assessment.................................................................6 2.2 Screening of Contaminants of Potential Concern........................................................7 3.0 Human Health Risk Assessment....................................................................9 3.1 Problem Formulation................................................................................................... 9 3.1.1 Off -Site Receptors.....................................................................................................10 3.2 Human Health Screening..........................................................................................10 3.2.1 COCs in Soil..............................................................................................................11 3.2.2 Other Considerations................................................................................................13 4.0 Ecological Risk Assessment........................................................................ 15 4.1 Problem Formulation.................................................................................................15 4.2 Ecological Screening.................................................................................................15 4.2.1 COCs in Soil..............................................................................................................16 4.2.2 COCs in Groundwater...............................................................................................17 5.0 Risk Management.......................................................................................... 19 5.1 Risk Management Measures.....................................................................................19 5.1.1 Hard or Fill Cap......................................................................................................... 19 5.1.1.1 Hard Cap............................................................................................................... 20 5.1.1.2 Fill Cap.................................................................................................................. 20 5.1.1.3 Record Keeping and Reporting.............................................................................20 5.1.2 Health and Safety Plan..............................................................................................21 W Overall Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................. 23 7.0 Qualifications of the Assessor..................................................................... 25 Cambium Inc. Page 2 i d Page iv CAMBIUM M Screening Level Risk Assessment — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 August 20, 2024 References..................................................................................................... 26 StandardLimitations..................................................................................... 27 List of Embedded Tables Embedded Table 1 Identification of Contaminants of Concern in Soil ..................................... 8 Embedded Table 2 Human Health Screening for Soil...........................................................12 Embedded Table 3 Ecological Screening for Soil..................................................................16 List of Appended Figures Figure 1 Site Location Plan Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Soil Quality Figure 4 Required Areas for Capping List of Appended Tables Table 1 Soil Quality List of Appendices Appendix A MGRA Model Output Appendix B Curriculum Vitae Cambium Inc. Flage 21 Y Page v 1.0 Introduction The Client retained Cambium to a complete an SLRA for the proposed North Bowmanville Dog Park, located east of the intersection of Longworth Avenue and Bowmanville Avenue in Bowmanville, Ontario (the Site; Figure 1). Cambium understands that the SLRA was completed to support the future development of the property as a dog park with a parking lot. The proposed dog park and parking lot area is shown on Figure 2. It is noted that the former use of the Site was industrial as a landfill, referred to as the Jackman Avenue Landfill, which is currently closed. Two Certificates of Approval (A311605 and A390307) exist for the Site, which include the closure of the landfill; therefore, it is anticipated an RSC will not be required to support a change of land use as per Part IV, paragraph 13 (3) of O.Reg 153/04. The SLRA was thus completed to assess the risks to human health and the environment for future development scenarios that include land use as a dog park (parkland use). The SLRA was completed with a due diligence, screening level approach in general accordance with O.Reg. 153/04; however, this assessment is not suitable for submission to the Ministry for the purpose of filing an RSC. As such, a risk assessment completed in accordance with O.Reg. 153/04 may have different conclusions and recommendations regarding on- and off -site risks and/or required RMMs for future RPI land use. In addition, it is noted that the scope of the SLRA is limited to an assessment of risk via exposure to surficial soil at the Site; groundwater (on -site and off -site) and surface water (off - site) exposures pathways are not evaluated. As such, this is a scoped SLRA. 1.1 Property Information The Site is on the north side of Longworth Avenue in Bowmanville, Ontario, east of the intersection of Longworth Avenue and Bowmanville Avenue (Figure 1). The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates for the centroid of the Site are Zone 17T, 684,428 m east, 4,865,964 m north. The site plan is shown on Figure 2. The Site is currently undeveloped but it is understood that the former use of the Site was as a landfill (considered industrial land Cambium Inc. Page zzu Page 1 use). The landfill is currently closed, as detailed in the existing Certificates of Approval (A311605 and A390307) for the Site. Cambium understands that the SLRA is intended to support the future development of the property as a dog park with a parking lot. The proposed dog park and parking lot area is shown on Figure 2. Given two Certificates of Approval exist for the site, it is anticipated an RSC will not be required to support a change of land use as per Part IV, Paragraph 13 (3) of O.Reg 153/04). 1.2 Review of Existing Reports The following reports were reviewed by Cambium prior to completing the SLRX • Geotechnical Investigation Report - North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario. Cambium Inc. December 21, 2023. • Preliminary Soil Characterization Report - North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario. Cambium Inc. January 5, 2024. • Assessment of Past Uses — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario. Cambium Inc. July 31, 2024. • Sampling and Analysis Plan — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario. Cambium Inc. July 31, 2024. • Excess Soil Characterization Report — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario. Cambium Inc. August 7, 2024. A summary of the above listed reports as they relate to the current configuration of the Site is provided below. Geotechnical Investigation Report (Cambium, 2023) As part of a geotechnical investigation, Cambium advanced three test pits (TP101-23 to TP103-23) on November 27, 2023. The geotechnical investigation was completed in support of the proposed redevelopment of the Site with a dog park. Each test pit was advanced using hand tools to a depth of approximately 0.6 mbgs. The soil profile of the test pits was generally comprised of a layer of topsoil, underlain by coarse grained fill (as observed in TP101-23), Cambium Inc. Page zzi Page 2 earth fill with construction debris (as observed in TP102-23), or native silty sand (as observed in TP103-23). Groundwater was not observed in the open test pits during the investigation. Preliminary Soil Characterization Report (Cambium, 2024) In January 2024, Cambium completed preliminary soil characterization during the geotechnical investigation (Cambium, 2023). One sample from each test pit (TP101-23 to TP103-23) completed as part of the geotechnical investigation was analyzed for PHCs F1 to F4, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX), metals, hydride -forming metals, EC, SAR, and pH. The following exceedances were identified compared to the Table 1 full depth background site condition standards (SCS) for residential, parkland, institutional, industrial, commercial, community (RPIICC) property use (Table 1 SCS): • TP101 from 0.2 to 0.4 mbgs: PHC F4 • TP102 from 0.2 to 0.6 mbgs: PHC F4, antimony, lead, and zinc • TP103 from 0.2 to 0.6 mbgs: antimony, barium, lead, and zinc Assessment of Past Uses (Cambium, 2024) In July 2024, Cambium completed an Assessment of Past Uses (APU) at the Site. The APU will be used to support the reuse or disposal of excess soil under O.Reg. 406/19 and the associated document "Rules for Soil Management and Excess Soil Quality Standards" (Soil Rules). The APU identified four potentially contaminating activities (PCAs), two on -site and two off -site, within the APU Study Area. The on -site PCAs are related to an on -site historical waste disposal site and importation of fill material of unknown quality. The off -site PCAs were related to historical orchards. The on -site PCAs contributed to areas of potential environmental concern (APECs) in the Project Area. Based on the observations and information obtained for the Project Area during the APU, sampling for excess soil characterization within the APECs for contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) was required to support excess soil removal from the Site. Cambium Inc. Page zzz Page 3 The identified COPCs were BTEX, PHCs, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), metals, hydride -forming metals, and ORPs including EC, SAR, hot water soluble boron (HWS-B), cyanide (CN-), mercury (Hg), and hexavalent chromium (CrVI). Sampling and Analysis Plan (Cambium, 2024) Following the completion of the APU, a sampling and analysis plan (SAP) was completed to support the reuse or disposal of excess soil under O.Reg. 406/19 and the associated Soil Rules. The SAP included the proposed advancement of nine test pits (TP201-24 to TP209-24) across the entire site to investigate the APECs and associated COPCs identified in the APU. Excess Soil Characterization Report (Cambium, 2024) In August 2024, Cambium completed an excess soil characterization program for Site in support of the proposed construction of a dog park and parking lot. Cambium oversaw the advancement of nine test pits across the Site to a depth of about 0.6 to 0.8 mbgs. Ten soil samples were submitted for the analysis of the COPCs identified in the APU. Two soil samples collected from TP203 from 0.4 to 0.6 mbgs and 0.6 to 0.8 mbgs exceeded the Table 1 SCS for the following parameters: • TP203 from 0.4 to 0.6 mbgs: EC and SAR • TP203 from 0.6 to 0.8 mbgs: PHCs F2, F3, and F4 Cambium Inc. Flage 223 Page 4 1.3 Objectives The objectives of the SLRA are the following: • Take a screening level approach to evaluating the potential adverse effects associated with exposure to identified on -site impacts in soil and groundwater, for both human health and the environment • Provide recommendations for RMMs to mitigate any potentially unacceptable risks 1.4 Risk Assessment Assumptions The SLRA was conducted based on the following assumptions: 1. The future use of the property will be parkland. It is noted that the former use of the Site was industrial as a landfill, referred to as the Jackman Avenue Landfill, which is currently closed. Two Certificates of Approval (A311605 and A390307) exist for the Site, which include the closure of the landfill; therefore, it is anticipated an RSC will not be required to support a change of land use as per Part IV, Paragraph 13 (3) of O.Reg 153/04. The SLRA was thus completed to assess the risks to human health and the environment for future development scenarios that include land use as a dog park. The SLRA was completed with a due diligence, screening level approach in general accordance with O.Reg. 153/04; however, this assessment is not suitable for submission to the Ministry for the purpose of filing an RSC. As such, a risk assessment completed in accordance with O.Reg. 153/04 may have different conclusions and recommendations regarding on- and off -site risks and/or required RMMs for future RPI land use. 2. Existing data for the Site only includes surface soil samples as the previous investigations at the Site were completed in support of excess soil characterization of surficial material that would be removed from Site during the development of the proposed dog park and parking lot. As such, the SLRA assesses on -site risk via exposure to COCs in surficial soil at the Site to a maximum depth of 0.8 mbgs. Exposure pathways associated with groundwater (on -site and off -site) and surface water (off -site) are not evaluated. As such, this is a scoped SLRA. Cambium Inc. Flage 224 Page 5 2.0 Contaminants of Concern 2.1 Applicable Standards for Risk Assessment The following site characteristics were reviewed to determine the applicable SCS in the Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (MOE, 2011a). • The proposed future use of the Site is parkland as a dog park and associated parking lot. As previously discussed, the former use of the Site was industrial as a landfill, referred to as the Jackman Avenue Landfill, which is currently closed. Two Certificates of Approval (A311605 and A390307) exist for the Site, which include the closure of the landfill; therefore, it is anticipated an RSC will not be required to support a change of land use (Part IV, Paragraph 13 (3) of O.Reg 153/04). • The Site is not within 30 m of a water body as defined in O.Reg. 153/04. As such, Section 43.1 of O.Reg. 153/04 does not apply (the nearest surface water body is Bowmanville Creek, which is approximately 50 m east of the Site). • For groundwater at a property to be considered non -potable, all properties within 250 m of the property must be supplied by a municipal drinking water system that does not obtain its water from a groundwater source. It is noted that properties within 250 m of the Site are privately serviced for drinking water. Two water wells, located 110 m west of the Site, were identified through the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (Ministry) water well information system (WWIS) database, reportedly installed in 1998 to a depth of 28.7 and 55.2 mbgs (MECP, 2024). While the Site and surrounding properties are serviced by a municipal drinking water system, the Region of Durham generally requires use of potable groundwater standards. • Previous investigations at the Site were not completed to depths greater than 2 mbgs; however, review of well records in the WWIS information database indicates that bedrock on surrounding properties is at a depth greater than 2 mbgs. As such, Section 43.1(a) of O.Reg. 153/04 does not apply. Cambium Inc. Page 1Lb Page 6 • The southeast portion of the Site includes property regulated by Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) and is identified as Greenbelt land. As such, the Site is considered environmentally sensitive as per Section 41 of O.Reg. 153/04. • No grain size analysis was completed for soil samples collected at the Site. As such, SCS for coarse textured soil were conservatively selected to account for the potential presence of coarse grained fill material. • On -site soil pH was within the acceptable ranges for surficial (:51.5 mbgs) soil; however, subsurface (>1.5 mbgs) soil samples were not collected at the Site. As such, it was conservatively assumed that the Site is environmentally sensitive as per Section 41 of O. Reg. 153/04. Based on the review of site characteristics, the Table 1 SCS for RPIICC property use and coarse textured soil were considered applicable. 2.2 Screening of Contaminants of Potential Concern Data collected in the environmental investigations conducted by Cambium and described above were used to determine the COCs in soil to be assessed in the SLRA. As noted above, no groundwater data was collected on -site, as such, the SLRA only considers risk via exposure to COCs in surficial soil to a maximum depth of 0.8 mbgs. To select the COCs to be retained in the SLRA, the maximum concentration of each COPC was screened against its respective Table 1 SCS; a parameter is defined as a COC if its maximum measured concentration is greater than its applicable Table 1 SCS. The COCs retained in the SLRA are summarized in Embedded Table 1 for soil. Soil results are presented in Figure 3. Cambium Inc. Flage 22b Page 7 Embedded Table 1 Identification of Contaminants of Concern in Soil COC Maximum Concentration (Ng/g) Table 1 SCS (Ng/g) Location and Sample Depth of Maximum Concentration Antimony 27.5 1.3 TP103-23 (0.2 to 0.6 mbgs) Barium 245 220 TP103-23 (0.2 to 0.6 mbgs) Lead 361 120 TP102-23 (0.2 to 0.6 mbgs) Zinc 475 290 TP102-23 (0.2 to 0.6 mbgs) EC 1040 570 TP203-23 (0.4 to 0.6 mbgs) SAR 11.2 2.4 TP203-23 (0.4 to 0.6 mbgs) PHC F2 13 10 TP203-24 (0.6 to 0.8 mbgs) PHC F3 403 240 TP203-24 (0.6 to 0.8 mbgs) PHC F4 284 120 TP101-23 (0.2 to 0.4 mbgs) Complete laboratory Certificates of Analysis for soil are provided in the Excess Soil Characterization report completed by Cambium (Cambium, 2024). Cambium Inc. Flage 221 Page 8 3.0 Human Health Risk Assessment The HHRA provides a screening level (qualitative) evaluation of risks to human health associated with the COCs identified in soil. As described in Section 2, multiple COCs were retained. 3.1 Problem Formulation The potential for adverse effects via exposure to COCs in on -site surface soil is related to the receptors anticipated to be on the property and the pathways via which they may be exposed to COCs. The receptors and their primary associated exposure pathways for a parkland property are described below. It is noted that no groundwater -based pathways were evaluated in this SLRA, as previous investigations were limited to surficial soil. Visitor This is a visitor (any age group) to the Site in a parkland land use scenario that may be exposed to COCs via the following exposure pathways: dermal contact, incidental ingestion and inhalation of particulates from soil, and inhalation of vapours in outdoor air. This receptor may be exposed to COCs via inhalation of indoor air in any on -site building; however, no enclosed buildings exist on -site and proposed development plans do not include enclosed buildings. As such, inhalation of indoor air was not considered a complete pathway and was not considered further in the HHRA. Outdoor Worker This is an adult worker that primarily spends a standard work -day on -site while outdoors conducting regular maintenance, landscaping, or other outdoor activities. This receptor may be exposed to COCs via the following exposure pathways: dermal contact, incidental ingestion and inhalation of particulates from soil; and inhalation of vapours in outdoor air. Subsurface Worker This is an adult worker expected to spend the majority of their time within an excavation trench. This receptor may be exposed to COCs via the following exposure pathways: dermal Cambium Inc. Flage 228 Page 9 contact, incidental ingestion and inhalation of particulates from soil, and inhalation of vapours in trench air. It is noted that an indoor worker (an adult worker that primarily spends a standard work -day on -site while indoors) would typically be included as a receptor in an HHRA completed for a parkland property, as this receptor may be exposed to COCs via inhalation of indoor air. It is noted that there are no enclosed buildings on -site and proposed development plans do not include enclosed buildings. As such, an indoor worker was not considered further in the HHRA. 3.1.1 Off -Site Receptors Existing data for the Site only includes surface soil samples as the previous investigations at the Site were completed in support of excess soil characterization of surficial material that would be removed from Site during the development of the proposed dog park and parking lot. As such, the SLRA only assesses on -site risk via exposure to COCs in surficial soil at the Site to a maximum depth of 0.8 mbgs. Exposure pathways associated with groundwater (on -site and off -site) and surface water (off -site) are not evaluated. As such, this is a scoped SLRA. 3.2 Human Health Screening Table 1 SCS (reflective of background conditions in Ontario) were selected as the appropriate initial screening criteria, as the Site is considered environmentally sensitive as per Section 41 of O.Reg. 153/04. In the development of generic SCS (e.g., Table 2 full depth generic SCS in a potable ground water condition), the Ministry considered multiple receptors (both human and ecological) and exposure pathways associated with a given property use. The final generic SCS were determined by evaluating the lowest of the selected component values developed by the Ministry (MOE, 2011 b). As a result, these component values for generic SCS, such as Table 2 SCS, can be used to support a further screening level assessment for the HHRA by only considering component values related to human health. Based on the site characteristics detailed in Section 2.1, the Table 2 SCS can be used to support a screening level assessment for the HHRA (MOE, 2011 b). The component values used in the human health screening are those provided by the Ministry's Modified Generic Risk Assessment (MGRA) Approved Model Cambium Inc. Flage 22Y Page 10 (MECP, 2016), as updated with toxicological reference values currently endorsed by the Ministry (MECP, 2024). Component values used in this SLRA are provided in Appendix A. This process is described in the following sections for soil. As mentioned in Section 2.2, groundwater characterization was not completed at the Site as part of the previous investigation, as such, groundwater exposure pathways were not considered further in the SLRA. 3.2.1 COCs in Soil The soil -based component values appropriate for human health screening on a commercial and community property with potable groundwater are as follows: • S1: Soil ingestion, dermal contact (i.e., direct contact), and soil particulate inhalation exposure pathways for residents. A resident of the Site is assumed to live on the property from birth, through life stages of infant, toddler, child, teen, and adult. The resident was considered a surrogate for the visitor in a parkland scenario due to having a much greater exposure rate to COCs in soil. • S2: Soil ingestion, dermal contact (i.e., direct contact), and soil particulate inhalation exposure pathways for outdoor workers. • S3: Soil ingestion, dermal contact and soil particulate inhalation exposure pathways in a commercial setting, relevant for subsurface workers in a trench. • S-GW1: Leaching from soil to groundwater and migration to on -site drinking water wells, protective of all receptors. Given that there are no drinking water wells at the Site and existing data for the Site only includes surface soil, the SLRA only assesses on -site risk via exposure to COCs in surficial soil at the Site to a maximum depth of 0.8 mbgs. Exposure pathways associated with groundwater (on -site and off -site) are not evaluated. Therefore, the S-GW1 component value was not considered further in the HHRA. • Outdoor Air: Soil to outdoor (aboveground) air inhalation pathway for all on -site receptors. Cambium Inc. Page 1ju Page 11 The Free Phase Threshold component value is a soil concentration based on the potential for the formation of free -phase product in soil. COC concentrations in soil are compared to the Free Phase Threshold in Embedded Table 2, below. It is noted that there are no component values available for soil to trench air inhalation. However, the S-IA component value for residential/parkland/institutional use (component value for soil to indoor air inhalation, protective of residents in an enclosed building) is considered protective of trench air quality. Appropriate component values are those derived for parkland property use, potable groundwater, and coarse textured soil. Human health component value screening for the retained COCs in soil is presented in Embedded Table 2. Component values used in this assessment are provided in Appendix B. It is noted that EC and SAR identified in soil are related to phytotoxicity and thus are not relevant to human health. As such, these parameters were not considered for assessment in the HHRA and no unacceptable risks are anticipated via human health -related exposure pathways for these COCs. Embedded Table 2 Human Health Screening for Soil COC Maximum Concentration s1 S2 S3 S-IA Outdoor Air Free Phase Threshold Antimony 27.5 7.5 63 63 NV NV 8000 Barium 245 3800 32000 8600 NV NV 7700 Lead 361 45 420 420 NV NV 24000 Zinc 475 5600 47000 47000 NV NV 15000 PHC F2 13 3100 22000 48000 98 25000 2700 PHC F3 403 5800 40000 260000 NV NV 5800 PHC F4 284 6100 42000 400000 NV NV 6900 All concentrations in pg/g unless otherwise noted. Bold and shaded values represent an exceedance of that component value. < = less than reported detection limit NV — No value provided by the Ministry. The maximum concentration of antimony and lead each exceed their respective S1 component value. One antimony exceedance was identified at TP102-23 from 0.2 to 0.6 mbgs, located in the south portion of the Site in the proposed parking lot area. Exceedances of lead above the Cambium Inc. Page 231 Page 12 S1 component value were identified in soil collected from TP102-23 from 0.2 to 0.6 mbgs and TP103-23 from 0.2 to 0.6 mbgs, both located within the proposed parking lot area. Given the exceedances of the S1 component value, unacceptable risks are anticipated for direct contact with soil for the visitor and thus risk management is required in the form of a hard or fill cap. It is noted that the locations of the exceedances are in the south portion of the Site in the proposed parking lot area. Required RMMs are described in Section 5.0. 3.2.2 Other Considerations No exceedances of the S-IA component values were identified in the soil screening, which indicates that there is no unacceptable risk for exposure of a subsurface worker to trench air sourced from surficial soil. However, as previously discussed, given the age of the landfill that formerly operated at the Site (closed in 1982) and the lack of subsurface (<1.5 mbgs) soil characterization completed at the Site, the potential for unacceptable risk exists for intrusive activities at a depth greater than the maximum depth of the investigation (0.8 mbgs). In addition, groundwater characteristics (depth and quality) at the Site are not well understood, and as such, potential for unacceptable risk exists for contact with shallow groundwater during intrusive activities. Lastly, as the landfill could be producing methane gas that is not currently monitored, there is potential for unacceptable risk associated with methane gas production. As such, a HASP is conservatively required for subsurface investigation that involves the excavation of a trench that is deeper than it is wide. A HASP should be prepared under the guidance of a Qualified Person, to mitigate exposure via direct contact and particulate inhalation of soil, incidental ingestion and dermal contact with pooled groundwater within an excavation trench, or inhalation of trench air during intrusive activities. This RMM includes the requirement of PPE while conducting ground -intrusive activities, thereby reducing exposure to soil and groundwater within an excavation trench by a subsurface worker. Cambium Inc. Flage 232 Page 13 The HASP must include the mandatory use of generic PPE which includes the following items: • hard hat • safety vest • safety boots • safety glasses • gloves, covering the hands and forearms at a minimum long sleeve pants and shirts • hearing protection (if required during construction) Since there is a potential for unacceptable risks associated with inhalation of trench air by a subsurface worker. These risks should be mitigated through the use of auxiliary fans, or equivalent, in an excavation trench to increase the air exchange rate while subsurface workers are conducting ground -intrusive activities. Where mechanical ventilation within an excavation trench is impracticable or unfeasible, half -face respirators for organic vapours are required. As a precautionary measure it is recommend that contractors measure volatile/combustible vapours in a trench prior to entry and periodically while in the trench using a photoionization detector (PID) or similar to confirm that air quality meets the applicable occupational health and safety regulations. In the event that air quality is impacted or the observance of noxious odours or vapours, either the use of fans to manually increase air exchange rates or the use of respirators (with organic vapour cartridges) could be implemented to address the potential risk. Cambium Inc. Flage 233 Page 14 4.0 Ecological Risk Assessment The ERA provides a screening level evaluation of risks to ecological health associated with the COCs identified in soil. As described in Section 2, multiple COCs were retained. 4.1 Problem Formulation The potential for adverse effects via exposure to COCs in on -site media is related to the valued ecological components (VECs) anticipated to be on the property and the pathways via which they may be exposed to COCs. The VECs associated with parkland land use are described below (MOE, 2011 b): • Terrestrial plants (deep-rooted vegetation and herbaceous plants). • Soil invertebrates (earthworms and insects). • Mammals (meadow vole, short -tailed shrew, and red fox). • Birds (red -winged blackbird, American woodcock and red-tailed hawk). As the Site is to be redeveloped as a dog park, it is reasonable to assume that "visitors" should include both human and dog receptors, as well as general VECs described above, as defined by the Ministry (MOE, 2011b). Ecological risks are typically evaluated based on effects to a population or community of VECs, and thus the Ministry's ecological component values may not be protective of individual dogs. However, component values derived for human receptors are likely not protective of dogs, given the inter -species variation for soil ingestion rates, breathing rates, toxicology, etc. As a result, an evaluation of risk to individual dogs is outside the scope of the current assessment. 4.2 Ecological Screening Similar to the HHRA, ecological -based component values established by the Ministry in the development of Table 2 SCS can be used to support a screening level assessment for the ERA (MOE, 2011 b). Component values for soil used in this SLRA are provided in Appendix A. This ecological screening is presented in the following sections. Cambium Inc. Flage 234 Page 15 4.2.1 COCs in Soil The soil -based component values appropriate for ecological screening on a parkland property and coarse textured soil are as follows (MOE, 2011 b): • P&SO: Direct and indirect contact pathways for plants and soil organisms. • M&B: Direct and indirect contact pathways for mammals and birds. • S-GW3: Leaching of COCs from soil to groundwater and subsequent migration to aquatic biota in off -site surface water bodies. Existing data for the Site only includes surface soil. As such, the SLRA only assesses on -site risk via exposure to COCs in surficial soil at the Site to a maximum depth of 0.8 mbgs. Exposure pathways associated with groundwater (on -site) and surface water (off -site) are not evaluated. Therefore, the S-GW3 component value is not considered further in the ERA. The ecological screening for COCs in soil is presented in Embedded Table 3. Component values used in this assessment are provided in Appendix B. Embedded Table 3 Ecological Screening for Soil coc Maximum Concentration P&SO M&B Antimony 27.5 20 25 Barium 245 750 390 Lead 361 250 32 Zinc 475 400 340 EC (mS/cm) 1.04 0.7 NV SAR (unitless) 11.2 5 NV PHC F2 13 150 NV PHC F3 403 300 NV PHC F4 284 2800 NV All concentrations in pg/g unless otherwise noted. Bold and shaded values represent an exceedance of that component value. NV — No Value provided by the Ministry. Cambium Inc. Flage 23b Page 16 As shown in ecological screening for soil, the following component value exceedances were identified: • P&SO: antimony, lead, zinc, EC, SAR, and PHC F3 • M&B: antimony, lead, and zinc As a result of the above noted component value exceedances, potential unacceptable risks are anticipated for the VECs described below. Plants and Soil Organisms (P&SO) Since exceedances of available P&SO component values were identified for antimony, lead, zinc, EC, SAR, and PHC F3, unacceptable risk is anticipated via direct and indirect contact pathways for plants and soil organisms. It is noted that exceedances of the P&SO component values are located in the future parking lot area, as well as in the proposed dog park area, specifically at TP203-24. As such, risks are anticipated for plants and soil organisms via direct and indirect contact pathways with COCs in soil. Thus, risk management in the form of a hard or fill cap is required in the future parking lot area and in the vicinity of TP203-24, which is delineated by TP202-24 to the north, TP208-24 to the east, and TP205-24 to the south. Recommended RMMs are described in Section 5.0. Mammals and Bird (M&B) Since exceedances of available M&B component values were identified for antimony, lead, and zinc, unacceptable risk is anticipated via direct and indirect contact pathways for mammals and birds. It is noted that exceedances of the M&B component values are located in the future parking lot area. As such, risks are anticipated mammals and birds via direct and indirect contact pathways with COCs in soil. Thus, risk management in the form of a hard or fill cap is required in the future parking lot area. Recommended RMMs are described in Section 5.0. 4.2.2 COCs in Groundwater Existing data for the Site only includes surface soil, as such, the SLRA only assesses on -site risk via exposure to COCs in surficial soil at the Site to a maximum depth of 0.8 mbgs. Cambium Inc. Flage 23b Page 17 Exposure pathways associated with groundwater (on -site and off -site) are not evaluated. Therefore, exposure pathways associated with groundwater was not considered further in the ERA. Cambium Inc. Page Li / Page 18 5.0 Risk Management The HHRA identified potential unacceptable risk for the following human receptors in a parkland land use scenario: • Visitors exposed to COCs via direct contact with soil. • Given the age of the landfill that formerly operated at the Site (closed in 1982) and the lack of subsurface (<1.5 mbgs) soil characterization completed at the Site, the potential for unacceptable risk exists for intrusive activities at a depth greater than the maximum depth of the investigation (0.8 mbgs). In addition, groundwater characteristics (depth and quality) at the Site are not well understood, as such, potential for unacceptable risk exists for contact with shallow groundwater during intrusive activities. Lastly, as the landfill could be producing methane gas that is not currently monitored, there is potential for unacceptable risk associated with methane gas production. The ERA identified potential unacceptable risks for the following ecological receptors: • Plants and soil organisms exposed to COCs via direct and indirect contact with soil. • Mammals and birds exposed to COCs via direct and indirect contact with soil. 5.1 Risk Management Measures To address the risks described above, the proposed RMMs are described in the following sections. 5.1.1 Hard or Fill Cap A soil cover system is required across the Site as part of the redevelopment of the Site as a dog park (parkland use). The objective of the soil cover system is to provide a physical barrier that reduces the potential for exposure to impacted soil such that the direct contact exposure pathways can be considered incomplete. The barrier may consist entirely of a hard cap, or entirely of a fill cap, or of a hard cap in some areas of the Site and a fill cap in other areas of the Site. Exceedances resulting in unacceptable risks are located in the proposed parking lot Cambium Inc. Flage 238 Page 19 area and in the vicinity of TP203-24. Thus, risk management in the form of a hard or fill cap is required in the future parking lot area and in the vicinity of TP203-24, which is delineated by TP202-24 to the north, TP208-24 to the east, and TP205-24 to the south. The areas of the Site where a cap is required are presented on Figure 4. 5.1.1.1 Hard Cap The hard cap RMM option consists of capping of areas of impacted surficial soil on the Site with asphalt, concrete, a building slab, or a building foundation and floor slab, consisting of at least 150 mm of Granular "A" or equivalent material overlain by at least 75 mm of hot mix asphalt or concrete. Unimpacted soil is soil in which no COCs are present, or in which COCs are present but at a concentration that is less than Table 1 SCS. It is noted that the footprint of any future on -site building, is considered a suitable hard cap. 5.1.1.2 Fill Cap The fill cap RMM option consists of capping of areas on the Site where impacted surficial soil is present with a minimum of 0.5 m of unimpacted fill cover. Unimpacted soil is soil in which no COCs are present, or in which COCs are present but at a concentration that is less than Table 8 SCS. Where new deep -rooting trees are to be planted, the root ball of the tree is to be placed in a minimum of 1.5 m of unimpacted soil. 5.1.1.3 Record Keeping and Reporting Inspections of the hard cap/fill cap will be documented to maintain a permanent record of the conditions at the Site. These requirements include: 1. Semi-annual (spring and fall) inspections of the capping by the Owner or an assigned representative 2. Identification of any deficiencies observed during the inspection or at any other time 3. The repair forthwith of any such deficiencies Cambium Inc. Page zju Page 20 4. A permanent record of inspections, deficiencies, and repairs in a logbook maintained by or on behalf of the Owner 5.1.2 Health and Safety Plan Given the age of the landfill that formerly operated at the Site (closed in 1982) and the lack of subsurface (<1.5 mbgs) soil characterization completed at the Site, the potential for unacceptable risk exists for intrusive activities at a depth greater than the maximum depth of the investigation (0.8 mbgs). In addition, groundwater characteristics (depth and quality) at the Site are not well understood, as such, potential for unacceptable risk exists for contact with shallow groundwater during intrusive activities. Lastly, as the landfill could be producing methane gas that is not currently monitored, there is potential for unacceptable risk associated with methane gas production. As such, a HASP is conservatively required for subsurface investigation that involves the excavation of a trench that is deeper than it is wide. A HASP should be prepared under the guidance of a Qualified Person, to mitigate exposure via direct contact and particulate inhalation of soil, incidental ingestion and dermal contact with pooled groundwater within an excavation trench, or inhalation of trench air during intrusive activities. This RMM includes the requirement of PPE while conducting ground -intrusive activities, thereby reducing exposure to soil and groundwater within an excavation trench by a subsurface worker. The HASP must include the mandatory use of generic PPE which includes the following items: • hard hat • safety vest • safety boots • safety glasses • gloves, covering the hands and forearms at a minimum • long sleeve pants and shirts • hearing protection (if required during construction) Cambium Inc. Flage 24U Page 21 Since there is a potential for unacceptable risks associated with inhalation of trench air by a subsurface worker. Risks should be mitigated through the use of auxiliary fans, or equivalent, in an excavation trench to increase the air exchange rate while subsurface workers are conducting ground -intrusive activities. Where mechanical ventilation within an excavation trench is impracticable or unfeasible, half face respirators for organic vapours are required. As a precautionary measure it is recommend that contractors measure volatile/combustible vapours in a trench prior to entry and periodically while in the trench using a PID or similar to confirm that air quality meets the applicable occupational health and safety regulations. In the event that air quality is impacted or the observance of noxious odours or vapours in the presence of mechanical ventilation, the use of respirators (with organic vapour cartridges) could be implemented to address the potential risk. Cambium Inc. Flage 241 Page 22 6.0 Overall Conclusions and Recommendations The HHRA identified potential unacceptable risk for the following human receptors in a parkland land use scenario: • Visitors exposed to COCs via direct contact with soil. Risk management in the form of a hard or fill cap is required in the future parking lot area. The areas of the Site where a cap is required are presented on Figure 4. • Given the age of the landfill that formerly operated at the Site (closed in 1982) and the lack of subsurface (<1.5 mbgs) soil characterization completed at the Site, the potential for unacceptable risk exists for intrusive activities at a depth greater than the maximum depth of the investigation (0.8 mbgs). In addition, groundwater characteristics (depth and quality) at the Site are not well understood, as such, potential for unacceptable risk exists for contact with shallow groundwater during intrusive activities. Lastly, as the landfill could be producing methane gas that is not currently monitored, there is potential for unacceptable risk associated with methane gas production. A HASP, prepared by a Qualified Person, is required for subsurface investigation that involves the excavation of a trench that is deeper than it is wide to mitigate exposure via direct contact and particulate inhalation of soil, incidental ingestion and dermal contact with pooled groundwater within an excavation trench, or inhalation of trench air during intrusive activities. The HASP should include the use of auxiliary fans, or equivalent, in an excavation trench to increase the air exchange rate with an excavation trench while subsurface workers are conducting ground -intrusive activities. Where mechanical ventilation within an excavation trench is impracticable or unfeasible, half face respirators for organic vapours are required. The ERA identified potential unacceptable risks for the following ecological receptors: • Plants and soil organisms exposed to COCs via direct and indirect contact with soil. Risk management in the form of a hard or fill cap is required in the future parking lot area and in the vicinity of TP203-24, which is delineated by TP202-24 to the north, TP208-24 to the east, and TP205-24 to the south. Cambium Inc. Page 242 Page 23 • Mammals and birds exposed to COCs via direct and indirect contact with soil. Risk management in the form of a hard or fill cap is required in the future parking lot area. Cambium Inc. Page 24,E Page 24 7.0 Qualifications of the Assessor This SLRA was completed under the supervision of Mark Beasy, M.Sc., QPRA. Credentials are presented in Appendix B. Information presented in this report is true and accurate to the best of the assessors' knowledge. Respectfully submitted, Patrick Garrett, M.Sc., C.Chem. Project Manager/Risk Assessor PJG/mb Mark Beasy, M.Sc., QPRA Senior Risk Assessor Ilcambiumincstorage. file. core. windows. netlprojects119100 to 19199119181-001 Municipality of Clarington - GEO - North Bowmanville Dog ParkOeliverableslREPORT - SLRA12024-08-20 RPT SLRA - North Bowmanville Dog Park. docx Cambium Inc. Flage 244 Page 25 8.0 References Cambium. (2023). Geotechnical Investigation Report - North Bowmanville Dog Park. Cambium. (2024). Assessment of Past Uses — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario. Cambium Inc. July 31, 2024. Cambium. (2024). Excess Soil Characterization Report - North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario. Cambium Inc. August 20, 2024. Cambium. (2024). Preliminary Soil Characterization Report - North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario. Cambium. (2024). Sampling and Analysis Plan - North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario. Cambium Inc. July 31, 2024. MECP. (2016). Modified Generic Risk Assessment Approved Model. Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks. November 1, 2016. MECP. (2024). Human Health Toxicity Reference Values (TRVs) . Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks. March 2024. MECP. (2024, 07 16). Map: Well Records. Retrieved from Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks: https://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/map-well- records MOE. (2011 a). Soil, Groundwater, and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. Ministry of the Environment. April 15, 2011. MOE. (2011 b). Rationale for the Development of Soil and Ground Water Standards for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario. Ministry of the Environment. April 15, 2011. Cambium Inc. Flage 24b Page 26 9.0 Standard Limitations Limited Warranty In performing work on behalf of a client, Cambium relies on its client to provide instructions on the scope of its retainer and, on that basis, Cambium determines the precise nature of the work to be performed. Cambium undertakes all work in accordance with applicable accepted industry practices and standards. Unless required under local laws, other than as expressly stated herein, no other warranties or conditions, either expressed or implied, are made regarding the services, work or reports provided. Reliance on Materials and Information The findings and results presented in reports prepared by Cambium are based on the materials and information provided by the client to Cambium and on the facts, conditions and circumstances encountered by Cambium during the performance of the work requested by the client. In formulating its findings and results into a report, Cambium assumes that the information and materials provided by the client or obtained by Cambium from the client or otherwise are factual, accurate and represent a true depiction of the circumstances that exist. Cambium relies on its client to inform Cambium if there are changes to any such information and materials. Cambium does not review, analyze or attempt to verify the accuracy or completeness of the information or materials provided, or circumstances encountered, other than in accordance with applicable accepted industry practice. Cambium will not be responsible for matters arising from incomplete, incorrect or misleading information or from facts or circumstances that are not fully disclosed to or that are concealed from Cambium during the provision of services, work or reports. Facts, conditions, information and circumstances may vary with time and locations and Cambium's work is based on a review of such matters as they existed at the particular time and location indicated in its reports. No assurance is made by Cambium that the facts, conditions, information, circumstances or any underlying assumptions made by Cambium in connection with the work performed will not change after the work is completed and a report is submitted. If any such changes occur or additional information is obtained, Cambium should be advised and requested to consider if the changes or additional information affect its findings or results. When preparing reports, Cambium considers applicable legislation, regulations, governmental guidelines and policies to the extent they are within its knowledge, but Cambium is not qualified to advise with respect to legal matters. The presentation of information regarding applicable legislation, regulations, governmental guidelines and policies is for information only and is not intended to and should not be interpreted as constituting a legal opinion concerning the work completed or conditions outlined in a report. All legal matters should be reviewed and considered by an appropriately qualified legal practitioner. Site Assessments A site assessment is created using data and information collected during the investigation of a site and based on conditions encountered at the time and particular locations at which fieldwork is conducted. The information, sample results and data collected represent the conditions only at the specific times at which and at those specific locations from which the information, samples and data were obtained and the information, sample results and data may vary at other locations and times. To the extent that Cambium's work or report considers any locations or times other than those from which information, sample results and data was specifically received, the work or report is based on a reasonable extrapolation from such information, sample results and data but the actual conditions encountered may vary from those extrapolations. Only conditions at the site and locations chosen for study by the client are evaluated; no adjacent or other properties are evaluated unless specifically requested by the client. Any physical or other aspects of the site chosen for study by the client, or any other matter not specifically addressed in a report prepared by Cambium, are beyond the scope of the work performed by Cambium and such matters have not been investigated or addressed. Reliance Cambium's services, work and reports may be relied on by the client and its corporate directors and officers, employees, and professional advisors. Cambium is not responsible for the use of its work or reports by any other party, or for the reliance on, or for any decision which is made by any party using the services or work performed by or a report prepared by Cambium without Cambium's express written consent. Any party that relies on services or work performed by Cambium or a report prepared by Cambium without Cambium's express written consent, does so at its own risk. No report of Cambium may be disclosed or referred to in any public document without Cambium's express prior written consent. Cambium specifically disclaims any liability or responsibility to any such party for any loss, damage, expense, fine, penalty or other such thing which may arise or result from the use of any information, recommendation or other matter arising from the services, work or reports provided by Cambium. Limitation of Liability Potential liability to the client arising out of the report is limited to the amount of Cambium's professional liability insurance coverage. Cambium shall only be liable for direct damages to the extent caused by Cambium's negligence and/or breach of contract. Cambium shall not be liable for consequential damages. Personal Liabilitv The client expressly agrees that Cambium employees shall have no personal liability to the client with respect to a claim, whether in contract, tort and/or other cause of action in law. Furthermore, the client agrees that it will bring no proceedings nor take any action in any court of law against Cambium employees in their personal capacity. Cambium Inc. F'age Lob Page 27 Screening Level Risk Assessment — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 CAMBIUM M August 20, 2024 Appended Figures Cambium Inc. Flage 241 FEG�O3 -� to A mo ( \ SCREENING LEVEL RISK ASSESSMENT THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON North Bowmanville Dog Park Bowmanville, Ontario LEGEND 07 Highway Major Road o tpUNjON Zia Minor Road ao 0 t t Railway A 07 o Watercourse \0-1- > 115 Water Area mN ' 90 First Nations Reserve 7-G 2 CON Rp ` Ntyp3 Provincial Park co Wooded Area 0< ` o� v Q \ Built Up Area 2'0 \ES�ONEpO r 2 PEg RO aN 5� '�A N pSN S TE �n vm CO C10E5510N IN ti E Notes: -This document contains information licensed under the Open Government License - Ontario. - Distances on this plan are in metres and can be converted to feet by dividing by 0.3M. - Cambium Inc. makes every effort to ensure this map is free from errors but cannot be held responsible for any damage. due to error or omissions. This map should not be used for navigation or legal purposes. It is intended for general reference use only. Sophia Street MMI194 _ = Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 1E5 Tel: (705) 742.7900 Fax: (705) 742.7907 —.cambium-inc.com CAMBIUM SITE LOCATION PLAN Project No.: Date: August 2024 19181-001 Rev.: Scale: Projection: 0 1 2 3 4 5 1:100,000 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N km Created by: Checked by: Figure: Page 248 TLC PG I Area of Potential APEC 1 APEC 2 Potentially Contaminating Activity PCA #58: Waste Disposal and Waste Management, including thermal 1 treatment, landfilling and transfer of waste, other than use of biosoils as soil conditioners 2 PCA #30: Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality SCREENING LEVEL RISK ASSESSMENT THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON North Bowmanville Dog Park Bowmanville, Ontario LEGEND 1 Test Pit Gravel Parking Lot L - 1 Site Areas of Potential Environmental Concern: APEC 1, 2 Notes: - Project Area and Gm el Parking Lot Area are approximate and were obtained from Proled: North Bovrtnanville Leash Free Dog Park, Grading Plan, Dravnng No. 1-3, Dated Oct 2023. -This d...ment contains information licensed under the Open Government License -Ontario. - Distances on this plan are in metres and can be converted to feet by dividing by 0.3048. -Cambium Inc. makes every effort to ensure this map is free from emm but cannot be held responsible for any damages due to error or omissions. This map should not be used for navigation or legal purposes. It is intended for general reference use only. CAMBIUM 194 Sophia Street Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 1E5 Tel: (705) 742.7900 Fax: (705) 742.7907 www.cambrum-inc.com SITE PLAN s Project No.: Date: August 2024 19181-001 Rev.: L' Scale:Projection0 77" 1:1,500 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N Created by: Checked by: Figure. 2 Page 249 TLC PG TP201-24 r TP103 Depth (m) 0.2-0.6 Sample Date 2023-No,27 TP209-24 PHC F2 <4 TP202-24 _ , PHC F3 45 PHC F4 <6 Antimony 27.5 TP208-24 Barium z45 TP203 Tp20q-2q { Copper 77.1 Sample Type Parent Duplicate Lead 216 Depth (m) 0.6-0.8 0.6-0.8 Zi nc 469 Sample Data 2024-1a1-03 2024-1ul-03 TP203-24 TP206-24 F2 13 11 F3 324 403 F4 88 266 TP103-23 nony <1.0 <1.0 TP205-24 TP207-24 um 25.3 22.8 6.1 5.4 23.6 32.6 24.0 23.2 TP202 Sample Type Parent Duplicate TP102-23 Depth (m) 0.2-0.6 0.2-0.6 Sample Date 2023-Nov-27 2023-Nov-27 TP301 PHC F2 <4 <4 PHC F3 167 74 ' Depth (m) 0.2-0.4 PHC F4 132 82 Sample Date PHC F2 2023-Nov-21 <4 TP101-23 _ Antimony Barium 13.5 168 4.5 155 PHC F3 100 Copper 61.9 50.5 PHC F4 294 Lead 277 351 Antimony <1.0 Zinc -75 397 Barium 42.6 -- Copper 15.2 Lead 30.9 Zinc 55.4 J - Page 250 SCREENING LEVEL RISK ASSESSMENT THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON North Bowmanville Dog Park Bowmanville, Ontario LEGEND Test Pit O Meets Table 1 RPIICC O Exceeds Table 1 RPIICC O Gravel Parking Lot L j Site Contaminant Table 1 RPIICC PHC F2 10 PHC F3 240 PHC F4 120 Antimony 1.3 Barium 220 Copper 92 Lead 120 Zinc 290 Notes: - Project Area and Gravel Parking Lot Area are approximate and were obtained from Proled: North Bovananville Leash Free Dog Park, Grading Plan, Dmvnng No. L3, Dated Oct 2023. -This document contains information licensed under the Open Government License -Ontario. - Distances on this plan are in metres and can be converted to feet by dividing by 0.3048. -Cambium Inc. makes every effort to ensure this map is free from errore but cannot be held responsible for any damages due to error or omissions. This map should not be used for navigation or legal purposes. It is intended for general reference use only. 194 Sophia Street _ = Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 1E5 Tel: (705) 742.7900 Fax: (705) 742.7907 —.cambium-inc.00m CAMBIUM SOIL QUALITY Project No.: Date: August 2024 19181-001 Rev.: Scale: Projection: 0 10 20 30 40 50 1:1,500 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N m Created by: Checked by: Figure: TLC PG 4 i36T1 Depth (ra) 0.2-0.4 Sample Date 2023- No, -27 4 PHC F2 PHC F3 100 284 PHC F4 Antimony <1.0 Barium 42.6 Copper 15.2 Lead 10.9 Zinc 55.4 1 SCREENING LEVEL RISK ASSESSMENT THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON North Bowmanville Dog Park Bowmanville, Ontario LEGEND Test Pit O Meets Table 1 RPIICC OExceeds Table 1 RPIICC OGravel Parking Lot TP103 _ Site Depth (m) 0.2-0.6 Required Areas for Capping Sample Date 2023-Nov-27 - PHC F2 <4 . PHC F3 45 Contaminant Table 1 RPIICC PHC F4 <6 PHC F2 10 Antimony 27.5 PHC F3 240 Ba rlum 24S PHCF4 120 _ Copper 77.1 Lead 216 Antimony 1.3 zinc 469 Barium 220 Copper 92 Lead 120 fP103-23 Zinc 290 TP102 - Sample Type Parent Duplicate TP102-23 Depth (m) 0.2-0.6 0.2-0.6 Sample Date 2023-Nov-27 2023-Nov-27 Notes: _ PHC F2 <q <q - Project Area and Gravel Parking Lot Area are approximate and were obtained from Proi North Bowmanville Leash Free Dog Park, Grading PHC F3 167 74 Plan, Drawing No. 1-3, Dated Oct 2023. . PHCF4 132 82 -This document contains information licensed under the Open Gavemment License - Ontario. - Distances on are in this plan metres and wn be converted to feet by TP 101-23 Antimony 13.5 q,5 dividing by 0.3048. -Cambium Inc. makes every effort to ensure this map is free from errore but Barium 168 155 cannot be held responsible for any damages due to error or omissions.This ` Copper 61.8 SD.S map should not be used for navigation or legal purposes. It is intended for general reference use only. � Lead 277 361 nnc 475 357 194 Sophia Street - - _ ?, Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 1E5 �_ r Tel: (705) 742.7900 Fax: (705) 742.7907 uwwv.cambiu m-in c.com CAMBIUM REQUIRED AREAS FOR CAPPING k ` Project No.: Date: August 2024 e 19181-001 Rev.: Scale: Projection: 0 10 20 30 40 50 1:1,500 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N Y m Created by: Checked by: Figure: Page 251 TLC PG Screening Level Risk Assessment — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 CAMBIUM M August 20, 2024 Appended Tables Cambium Inc. Flage Screening Level Risk Assessment North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville Municipality of Clarington 19181-001 Table 1: Summary of Soil Quality Location Code Field ID Depth (mbgs) Date TP101 TP102 I TP103 TP201 I TP202 I TP203 TP203 TP204 TP205 TP206 TP207 TP208 TP208 TP101 0.2-0.4 TP102 0.2-0.6 QAQC1 TP103 0.2-0.6 TP201 0.6-0.8 1 TP202 0.5-0.71 TP203 0.4-0.6 TP203 0.6-0.8 QAQC201 TP204 0.5-0.71 TP205 0.3-0.5 TP206 0.4-0.6 TP207 0.4-0.6 TP208 0.2-0.4 TP208 0.4-0.6 0.2-0.4 0.2-0.6 0.2-0.6 1 0.2-0.6 0.6-0.8 0.5-0.7 0.4-0.6 0.6-0.8 0.6-0.8 0.5-0.7 0.3-0.5 0.4-0.6 0.4-0.6 0.2-0.4 0.4-0.6 27 Nov 2023 27 Nov 2023 127 Nov 20231 27 Nov 2023 03 Jul 2024 03 Jul 2024 03 Jul 2024 03 Jul 2024 103JuI2024 03 Jul 2024 03 Jul 2024 03 Jul 2024 03 Jul 2024 03 Jul 2024 03 Jul 2024 Unit EQL Table 1 - RPIICC BTEX Benzene pglg 0.02 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Toluene pglg 0.05 0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Ethylbenzene pglg 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Xylene Total pglg 0.05 0.05" <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 PHCs F1 p919 7 2512 <7 <7 1 <7 <7 <7 <7 <7 <7 <7 <7 <7 <7 <7 1 <7 <7 F2 pglg 4 10" <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 13 11 5 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 F3 pglg 8 240" 100 167 74 45 19 <8 <8 324 403 119 10 27 <8 <8 20 F4 pglg 6 120 284 132 82 <6 7 <6 <6 88 125 47 7 7 <6 <6 16 F4G-SG (GHH-Silica) pglg 50 120 - - - - - - - - 266 - - - - - - PAHs Acenaphthene pg/g 0.02 0.072 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Acenaphthylene pg/g 0.02 0.093 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Anlhracene pg/g 0.02 0.16 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Benz(a)anthracene pg/g 0.02 0.36 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Benzo(a)pyrene pg/g 0.02 0.3 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene pg/g 0.02 0.68 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Benzo(k)fluoranthene pglg 0.02 0.48 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Benzo(blj)fluoranthene pg/g 0.02 0.47p5 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Chrysene p919 0.02 2.8 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.04 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Dibenz(a,h)anlhracene pg/g 0.02 0.1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Fluoranlhene p919 0.02 0.56 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.06 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Fluorene pglg 0.02 0.12 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene pg/g 0.02 0.23 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Methylnaphthalene 1 & 2 pg/g 0.04 0.59p6 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 Naphthalene pglg 0.01 0.09 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Phenanthrene pg/g 0.02 0.69 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.06 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Pyrene pg/g 0.02 1 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.07 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 PCBs PCBs total pg/g 0.05 0.3"' <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Decachlorobiphenyl mg/kg 0.131 0.136 0.126 0.123 0.104 0.126 0.125 0.122 0.119 0.117 0.101 VOCs Acetone pg/g 0.5 0.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Bromomethane p919 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Bromoform p919 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Bromodichloromethane pglg 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Carbon tetrachloride pglg 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Chlorobenzene pglg 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Chloroform pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dibromoethane,1,2- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichlorodifluoromethane pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichloroethane, 1,1- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichloroethane, 1,2- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichloromethane pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichloropropane, 1,2- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dichloropropene, 1,3- cis & trans pg/g 0.05 0.05pe <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Dibromochloromethane pg/g 1 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Hexane pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Methyl Ethyl Ketone pg/g 0.5 0.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Methyl Iso-Butyl Ketone pg/g 0.5 0.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 MTBE pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Styrene pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Tetrachloroethylene pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- pg/g j 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Trichloroethane,1,1,1- pg/g 10.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Trichloroethane,1,1,2- pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Trichloroethylene pg/g 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Trichlorofluoromethane pg/g 0.05 0.25 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 Vinyl chloride pg/g 0.02 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 Metals Antimony pg/g 1 1.3 <1.0 13.5 4.5 27.5 <1.0 <1.0 0.0 0.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Arsenic pg/g 1 18 2.9 8.1 8.4 8.8 2.0 1.4 7.4 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.5 1.7 2.4 1.2 1.3 Barium pg/g 1 220 42.6 168 155 245 15.9 12.7 62.5 25.3 22.8 24.1 34.5 16.7 54.6 18.7 23.3 Beryllium pg/g 0.5 2.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Boron pg/g 5 36 8.0 8.8 9.1 9.2 <5.0 <5.0 11.4 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 7.0 <5.0 <5.0 Cadmium pglg 0.5 1.2 <0.5 0.9 0.8 0.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Chromium (III+VI) pg/g 5 70 26.3 22.3 23.1 24.5 7.9 6.1 22.1 10.0 8.9 9.1 11.2 8.0 14.2 7.0 8.9 Cobalt pg/g 1 21 5.7 5.9 6.3 6.6 2.4 1.6 9.1 2.5 2.4 2.6 3.4 2.4 4.3 2.1 2.4 Copper pg/g 5 92 15.2 61.8 50.5 77.1 <5.0 <5.0 15.9 6.1 5.4 5.4 7.0 <5.0 10.0 <5.0 <5.0 Lead pg/g 1 120 10.9 277 361 216 1.9 1.5 8.1 23.6 32.6 5.3 7.9 2.4 12.0 1.8 4.1 Molybdenum pg/g 1 2 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.8 <1.0 <1.0 0.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.0 Nickel p9/9 5 82 8.6 13.3 13.9 14.7 <5.0 <5.0 23.7 5.2 5.1 <5.0 6.1 <5.0 8.2 <5.0 <5.0 Selenium pg/g 1 1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.0 Silver pg/g 0.3 0.5 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 Thallium pg/g 1 1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.0 Uranium pg/g 1 2.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.0 Vanadium p9/9 10 86 34.7 28.9 30.9 31.2 18.0 14.0 33.8 19.1 18.1 18.3 22.6 17.8 25.2 15.8 18.1 Zinc p9/9 20 290 55.4 475 469 <20.0 <20.0 49.8 24.0 23.2 20.9 29.5 <20.0 48.1 <20.0 <20.0 ORPs Boron (hot water soluble) pg/g 0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Chromium (hexavalent) pg/g 0.2 0.66 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Cyanide (Free) pg/g 0.03 0.051 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 Electrical Conductivity (Lab) pS/cm 5 570 151 147 139 138 114 81 1,040 329 339 389 136 137 98 88 103 Mercury pg/g 0.1 0.27 - - - - <0.1 <0.1 1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 pH (Lab) 0.05 5-9 1 7.54 7.47 7.38 7.41 1 6.88 7.12 1 7.43 6.98 1 7.07 1 7.10 1 7.07 1 7.18 1 7.42 1 7.50 7.41 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 0.011 2.4 1 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 1 0.09 0.09 1 11.2 0.071 0.07 1 0.07 1 0.08 1 0.09 1 0.11 1 0.12 0.11 Comments #1 Standard is applicable to total xylenes; m & p-xylenes and o-xylenes should be summed for comparison. #2 Standard is applicable to PHC in the F1 range minus BTEX. #3 Standard is applicable to PHC F2 minus naphthalene. If naphthalene is not analyzed, the standard is applied to F2. #4 Standard is applicable to PHC F3 minus PAHs (other than naphthalene). If PAHs have not been measured, the standard is applied to F3. #5 Standard is for benzo(b)fluoranthene; however, the laboratory can not distinguish between benzo(b)fluoranthene and benzo(k)fluoranthene. #6 Standard is applicable to Methylnaphthalene, 1- and Methylnaphthalene, 2-. If both are detected, the sum of the two must not exceed the standard. #7 Standard is applicable to total PCBs, Individual aroclors should be added for comparison. #8 Standard is applicable to 1,3-Dichloropropene. Individual isomers (cis + trans) should be added for comparison. Page 253 Screening Level Risk Assessment — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 CAMBIUM M August 20, 2024 Appendix A MGRA Model Output Cambium Inc. Flage Soil Components for Table 2 - Full Depth, Potable Water Scenario Coarse Textured Soil Residential /Parkland Land Use (ug/g) MOE Mass. Ont. Soil Plants & Mammals Soil Contact Soil L aching Indoor Air Indoor Air Outdoor Air Free Phase Soil Odour Chemical Parameter Soil RL PQL Bkgrd Soil Org. & Birds S1 Risk S-GW1 S-GW3 S-IA Odour Threshold S-Nose Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene 0.05 0.05 0.072 6600 j 360 150 12000 3900 2400 180 2800 2900 100 0.23 57 17 3.3 Acetone Aldrin 0.5 0.05 0.05 0.5 v� :; , ,:".. 0.16 15000 250 340 950 4300 160000 92000 140 0.044 38000 0.56 31 57 51 380000 11 19 260000 950 5000 2700 5200 Anthracene Antimony 11 1 5 1.3 ;=; ' .., E E.., E.., E... 220 20 25 8000 Arsenic 20 750 51 3800 12000 7700 Barium Benzene 0.02 0.02 25 370 9.3 0.92 300 820 17 5000 63 Benz[a]anthracene 0.05 0.36 5.7 190 9.9E+10 120 600 7600 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.05 0.49 20 1600 6.6 8.2E+14 340 68 7600 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.05 0.47 67 1.7E+15 2.7E+14 10000 3800 7600 7600 Benzo[ghi]perylene 0.1 0.68 57 2200 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.05 0.48 7.6 66 5.5E+14 12000 3800 7600 Beryllium 2 2.5 13 38 3900 Biphenyl1,1'- 0.051 PE6�Er?EEEE:�:EEEE:�:EEEE?N:;E;:::�SI :...........:; 0.5 € _ =::::v =:::Eve=:::Eve=�IN � I 0.5 0.05 rE �E6� E �E6� E �E6�ESEE::::y.:: .::::.: 0.5 ; 0.5 710 590 4000 11 2600 0.31 1.9 0.67 _ Bis(2 chloroethyl)ether 0.8 0.32 840 12 2000 2600 69 18 6400 11 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 14 1100 830 1.9E+09 7100 5000 Boron (total) 5 36 4300 5000 Bromodichloromethane 0.05 0.05 13 11 )0 5500 Bromoform 0.05 $ E E ] �EELEfEEE9E2EEE#EE?ELEEEEE' ••EE EE ., 0.05 72 4 50 30 1 220 27 71 11000 7300 5.4 6 Bromomethane Cadmium Carbon Tetrachloride Chlordane 0.05 1.2 0.05 12 5.8 1.9 6.3 0.097 30 18000 3900 120 7.6 15 0.51 50 470 7.6 5700 0,0 0.5 1.1 20 0.59 38 510 680 9.7 210 8400 110 Chloroaniline p- 0.5 6100 Chlorobenzene 0.05 0.05 61 1300 8 52 91 78 8900 3700 W 3.7 Chloroform 0.05 0.05 341 1.6 310 AM& 40 81 310 200 440 3.1 1400 880 6600 130000 260 Chlorophenol, 2- 0.1 0.1 9101 63 3.7 Chromium Total 5 70 28000 11000 Chromium VI 0.2 0.66 160 Chrysene 0.05 2.8 20 6.4E+10 3400 12000 7700 Cobalt 2 21 180 19000 Copper 5 92 770 Cyanide (CN-) 0.05 0.051 0.9 ;57 22 0.47 240000 Dibenz[a h]anthracene 0.1 0.16 22 5.3E+14 60000 790 7600 Dibromochloromethane 0.05 0.05 1000 10000 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- 0.05 0.05 3.4 1300 35 160 9200 3100 6.1 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- 0.05 0.05 47 24 0.4 1300 1300 .083 3300 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- 0.05 0.05 r`E'EEE.�`fliE'EEE.m`E'EE.�`E'EEEHEM.�`'E 0.05 3.6 22 18 3000 0.85 Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3'- 1 0.05 0.52 4200 150 1400 350 5000 Dichlorodifluoromethane 710 DDD 0.05 0.05 6.8 1300 32000000 5000 DDE 0.05 0.05 0.05 1.4 1 2.3 1300 300000000 5000 DDT 2.31 1800 180000000 5000 Dichloroethane, 1,1- 0.05L__� 0.05 8.4 840lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 34000 3.5 130 1500 4800 24 Dichloroethane, 1,2- 0.050.05 0.05 0,05 48 29 8.7 0.48 3900 640 1.4 5300 45 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- 50 43 1000 1.3 240 180 1300 3900 44 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- 0.05 0.05 0.05 84 42 2800 4700 3.4 34 1300 700 4600 4600 8.5 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- 0.05 84 420 1.9 Dichloro henol, 2,4- 0.1 0.1 1.7 63 1000 33000 Appendix A2 (4) Page 255 Soil Components for Table 2 - Full Depth, Potable Water Scenario Coarse Textured Soil I Residential /Parkland Land Use (ua/a) Dichloropropane, 1,2- 0.05 0.05 25 22 0.54 1600 82 0.027 2.3 4.5 27 2100 0.34 Dichloropropene,1,3- 0.05 0,05 25 0096 85 8.7 0.059 17 9 5000 1.2 Dieldrin 0.05 0.50 0.05 0.5 0.044 0.94 3.1 8700 7600 Diethyl Phthalate 11 94000 2200 1.5 Dimethylphthalate 0.5 0.5 17 94000 1400 0.5 15001 1800 Dimethylphenol, 2,4- 0.2 0 0.2 57000 Dinitrophenol, 2,4- 2 2 38 1300 13000 Dinitrotoluene, 2A & 2,6- 0.5 0.5 0.92 1.8 72 0.000013 0.000048 0.15 0.023 38 0.019 0.0011 4.7 55 90 ?1001 320 3800 Dioxane, 1,4 0.2 0.2 7.5 17000 180 57000 82000 Dioxin/Furan (TEQ) 5.4E-07 0.000007 0.0018 860 0.0028 0.11 7000 Endosulfan 0.04 0.04 110 7.3 8700 Endrin 0.04 0.04 18 1.5 5000 Ethylbenzene 0.050 0.05 0.05 360 1900 2.1 100 1600 16000 0.099 4500 2700 2000 7600 5.2 51 Ethylene dibromide 0.05 50 0.22 0.0048 Fluoranthene 0.05 0.56 57 180 210000 450 Fluorene 0.05 0.12 720 1100 1300 2800 Heptachlor 0.05 0.05 0.2 3.9 .15 66 14 19000 8300 370 Heptachlor Epoxide 0.05 0.05 0.11 6.6 0.52 2.9 7.1 0.52 012 8800 5000 9300 180 Hexachlorobenzene 0.01 0.01;250 300 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.01 0.01 35 1.2 210 2.8 8300 8.6 Hexachlorocyclohexane Gamma- 0.01 0.01 0.25 11 21 0.49 5000 Hexachloroethane 0.01 0.01 480 51 54 9400 0.46 Hexane (n) 0.05 0.05 1200 130000 7300 1500 7600 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene 0.1 0.23 5.7 220 1.9E+15 84000 Lead 10 120 0.27' 0.05 120 9.8 0.38 550 32000 2.5E+15 37 16 6.61 36 24000 34000 8000 Mercury 0.1 20 Methoxychlor 0.05 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.5 0.5 9900 13000 160 4900 750 44000 26000 26 1.7 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 0.5 0.5 21000 440 3100 39 23000 5100 Methyl Mercury ** 0.8 2 1 0.18 1300000 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 0.05 0.05 25 440 1.6 4800 170 8000 Methylene Chloride 0.05 0.05 0.78 350 110 4.8 160 670 2200 6400 150 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** 0.05 0.59 72 30 1700 34 3600 0.99 Molybdenum 2 2 40 110 22000 Naphthalene 0.05 0.09 3801 3601 931 4300 0.65 150 2701 2800 4.5 Nickel 5 82 500011 180 Pentachlmmnhennl 61 ti I' 17 361 861 641 1 1 9200 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** 10 25 210 6900 4100 1100 Aliphatic C6-C8 200000 150000 830 Aliphatic C>8-C10 4100 20000 2900 Aromatic C>8-C10 1600 410 850 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 10 10 150 3100 4300 4900 Aliphatic C>10-C12 4100 160000 5.1E+12 Aliphatic C>12-C16 4100 3100000 1.9E+15 Aromatic C>10-C12 1600 630 920 Aromatic C>12-C16 1600 1200 1100 Hetroieum Hydrocaroons r:j Aliphatic C>16-C21 Aliphatic C>21-C34 Aromatic C>16-C21 Aromatic C>21-C34 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 Aliphatic C>34 UU 501 1 1 Stsuu I 1000U 82000 7.8E+09 +14 iiLi1.2E000 900 61001 1600000 820000 1.2E+20 130 26000 320 560000 76 18000 61 4900 98 25000 390 20000 170 42000 22 11000 44 26000 1700 1700 1700 2900 2700 1700 6600 2500 2200 5800 6700 6900 3000 7900 6900 6900 Appendix A2 (5) Page 256 Soil Components for Table 2 - Full Depth, Potable Water Scenario Coarse Textured Soil Residential /Parkland Land Use (ug/g) MOE Mass. Ont. Soil Plants & Mammals Soil Contact Soil L aching Indoor Air Indoor Air Outdoor Air Free Phase Soil Odour Chemical Parameter Soil RL PQL Bkgrd Soil Org. & Birds S1 Risk S-GW1 S-GW3 S-IA Odour Threshold S-Nose Aromatic C>34 1200 330000 6.2 27001 17 17 EL 9.4 5400 240 33 1.1 0.3 770 4700 540 1700 10 110 6900 Phenanthrene 0.05 0.69 4400 2300 Phenol 0.5 0.5 1000 940 34000 16000 230000 970 Polychlorinated Biphenyls 0.3 0.3 2.1E+13 3.1 120 5000 Pyrene 0.05 1 14000 3500 41000 7700 Selenium 1 1.5 Silver 0.5 0.50 77 22000 Styrene 0.05 0.05 17 2500 47 1400 16 0.058 0.0045 0.28 18 3400 3500 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- 0.05 E:EE:EE:EE. EE 0.05 30 0.15 800 5.1 4400 0.05 4 0.14 1000 2400 1.6 6700 86 Tetrachloroethylene Thallium 0.05 E° 0.05 0.2 3.8 4.5 130 1.9 380 320 190 3700 61 1.4 150 3.9 140 1700 6.4 1500 22000 2.3 32 Toluene 0.2 6.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0004 35 34000 3300 Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4- 0.051 1 0.05 13 210 45 930 1100 290 3400 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- 0.051 0.05 18 820 42000 20 210 1000 12000 3700 250 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- Trich loroethylene T rich lorofl uoro methane W._ ?WaWaWa ---- 0.65 0.05 0.0 0.250 80 14 0.54 2700 2.9 3900 100 8.1 10 0.55 6500 480 12 4100 91 6300 20 86 4400 Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5- 0.1 0.1 56 9.1 590 14000 Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6- 0.1 0.1 4.4 56l 81 13000 Uranium 1 2.8 ki obi li .. :; �:; �E:; �E •;;n 0.05 500 33 39 40000 Vanadium Vinyl Chloride Y Xylene Mixture mpl:IEEE° °€EEE° °€.: !:, „,,,"•••„�••, , ';:Ii 0.05 200 3.4 95 12 96 7100 0.57 4200 0.19 120 580C 570 1000 580 14 4900 6100 2300 230 35 Zinc 30 290 400 6800 15000 Electrical Conductivity (mS/cm) 0.57 Chloride 5 210 52000 4800 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.4 Sodium I:Ev I:Ev I:Ev§I:Ir !ii E rEIIIEhgEIIIEhgEII'E: EN Appendix A2 (6) Page 257 Screening Level Risk Assessment — North Bowmanville Dog Park, Bowmanville, Ontario Municipality of Clarington Cambium Reference: 19181-001 CAMBIUM M August 20, 2024 Appendix B Curriculum Vitae Cambium Inc. Flage CAMBIUM Patrick Garrett, M.Sc., C.Chem. Environmental Specialist/Risk Assessor Mr. Garrett holds a Master of Science degree in Environmental Chemistry from the Royal Military College of Canada, as well as a Bachelor of Science in Environmental Chemistry from Queen's University. Mr. Garrett is a Chartered Chemist with Association of the Chemical Profession of Ontario. Mr. Garrett's experience includes Phase I/One and II/Two environmental site assessments, record of site condition, risk assessment, and excess soil management. Mr. Garrett's roles and responsibilities have been at all phases of the project life cycle, starting at the proposal stage, through to preparing and implementing field programs, to analysis of environmental data and final reporting. Mr. Garrett is also involved in the internal review process of Phase I/One and II/Two ESA reports, risk assessments, and excess soil management reporting. SUMMARY OF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2020 - Present Environmental Specialist/Risk Assessor. Cambium Inc. Kingston, ON, Canada Responsible for project management, including budgeting, coordination of project staff, sub -consultants and contractors, liaison with clients and regulators, ensuring compliance with federal, provincial, and municipal regulatory requirements, data analysis and interpretation, report preparation, and internal report review. Field of expertise includes environmental site assessments, soil and groundwater remediation, excess soil management, and risk assessment. 2017 - 2020 Environmental Scientist. Environmental Sciences Group (ESG)/Royal Military College of Canada (ESG/RMCC) Kingston, ON, Canada Conduct field/technical investigations, monitoring programs, and remediation projects for sites contaminated with pollutants related to Department of National Defense (DND) operational activities (PFAS, hydrocarbons, energetics, and other operational contaminants). 2015 - 2016 Notification Processing and Controls Officer. Environment and Climate Change Canada Gatineau, QC, Canada Administered the New Substances Notification Regulations (Chemicals and Polymers) [NSNR (Chemicals and Polymers)] and the New Substances Notification Regulations (Organisms) [NSNR (Organisms)] of CEPA. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 2020 — Present Association of the Chemical Profession of Ontario — Chartered Chemist Patrick Garrett, M.Sc., C.Chem. Page 259 Page No. 1 CAMBIUM EDUCATION & TRAINING 2019 M.Sc. Environmental Chemistry. Royal Military College of Canada (RMCC) Kingston, ON, Canada 2017 B.Sc. Honours. Environmental Chemistry. Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada PUBLICATIONS N-heterocyclic carbine-functionalized magic -number gold nanoclusters, Nature Chemistry, 11 (2019) 419-425 LANGUAGES • English PROFESSIONAL AREA OF FOCUS RISK ASSESSMENT -RESIDENTIAL RISK ASSESSMENT — BOWMANVILLE, ON Modified Generic Risk Assessment (MGRA) and Tier III Risk Assessment (RA) for a former industrial property that is being converted to a residential development in a high -profile area. Mr. Garrett is responsible for coordinating remediation activities, managing data, and providing RA support. - RESIDENTIAL RISK ASSESSMENT — PICKERING, ON Tier III RA for a former industrial property that is being converted to a residential development in a high - profile area. Mr. Garrett is responsible for coordinating delineation activities, managing data, and providing RA support. EXCESS SOIL MANAGEMENT - CITY OF QUINTE WEST ROAD RECONSTRUCTION — QUINTE WEST, ON Project coordinator and technical lead for in -situ excess soil characterization for various roadways in the City of Quinte West. The project involved the advancement of boreholes throughout the traveled portion of Patrick Garrett, M.Sc., C.Chem. Page 260 Page No. 2 CAMBIUM each roadway. Mr. Garrett was responsible for developing sampling and analysis plans, coordinating drilling activities and technical staff, data management, and final reporting. - PICTON ROAD RECONSTRUCTION — PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY, ON Project coordinator and technical lead for the characterization of over 15,000 m3 of in -situ excess soil to be generated during road reconstruction. The project involved the advancement of boreholes throughout the traveled portion of each roadway. Mr. Garrett was responsible for developing sampling and analysis plans, coordinating drilling activities and technical staff, data management, and final reporting. - LOYALIST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT— AMHERSTVIEW, ON Project coordinator and technical lead for the characterization of over 20,000 m3 of ex -situ and in -situ excess soil to be generated during a housing development. The project involved the advancement of test pits throughout the project area and within existing soil stockpiles. Mr. Garrett was responsible for developing sampling and analysis plans, coordinating subcontractors and technical staff, data management, and final reporting. GROUNDWATER MONITORING - 2017, 2018, 2019 CFB KINGSTON GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM — KINGSTON, ON Collected field data and performed in-depth statistical analysis on long-term groundwater monitoring trends. Prepared a detailed report on the findings. - 2018, 2019 CFB SUFFIELD GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM— SUFFIELD, AB Collected field data and performed in-depth statistical analysis on long-term groundwater monitoring trends. Prepared a detailed report on the findings. REMEDIATION - REMEDIATION OF A FUEL SPILL — KINGSTON, ON Operated and collected monitoring samples from a pump and treat remediation system. Prepared a report on the findings and efficiency of the remediation system. Patrick Garrett, M.Sc., C.Chem. Page 261 �r CAMBIUM APPLIED RESEARCH IN EMERGING CONTAMINANTS - 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTOCOL FOLLOWING EMERGENCY USE OF CLASS B AFFF — WAINWRIGHT, AB Provided a detailed report on the fate and transport of PFAS in soil, and the environmental response protocol following emergency use of Class B AFFF. GEOSTATISTICS - BACKGROUND SOIL CONCENTRATIONS OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN ARCTIC SOIL Performed in depth statistical analysis on a historical soil dataset collected as part of the DEW Line Clean - Up project. Prepared and defended as part of a Master of Science thesis at the Royal Military College of Canada. Patrick Garrett, M.Sc., C.Chem. Page 262 Page No. 4 CAMBIUM MARK BEASY, M. Sc., QPRA SUMMARY OF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2021 — Present Senior Risk Assessor. Cambium Inc. Oshawa, Ontario, Canada Senior Risk Assessor Mark's responsibilities include the coordination and management of projects related to environmental risk assessments, soil vapour and indoor air quality assessments. He also provides senior peer review support of RA work for external clients. Mark has extensive experience with proposal and report preparation including Due Diligence Risk Assessments, Opinion Letters, data compilation, and interpretation. 2019 — 2021 Senior Risk Assessor. Pinchin Ltd. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Conducted human health and ecological RAs under O.Reg. 153104, as well as under federal and other provincial guidelines. Provided peer reviews for internal and external projects, both for due diligence and for regulatory submission. Managed Soil Vapour and Indoor Air Quality Assessments for both due diligence and in support of RA under O.Reg. 153104. Developed toxicological assessments and air benchmarks for novel chemicals for which no guidelines are otherwise available. 2015 — 2019 Senior Risk Assessment Specialist. EXP Services Inc. Brampton, Ontario, Canada Conducted environmental and human health risk assessment projects under Ontario Regulations 153104 for various contaminated sites in Ontario (including Tier 2, Tier 3 and Due Diligence Risk Assessments). Oversaw additional projects such as monitoring programs for Certificates of Property Use under O. Reg. 153104; soil, groundwater and subslab vapour sampling programs; and, risk management plans. Completed ongoing project management, staff scheduling and professional mentorship duties. 2011 — 2014 Risk Assessment Specialist. SNC-Lavalin Inc., Environment & Water. Toronto, Ontario, Canada Conducted environmental and human health risk assessment projects under Ontario Regulations 153104 for various contaminated sites in Ontario (including Tier 2, Tier 3 and Streamlined Tier 3 Risk Assessments). Worked with site assessment staff to develop complete conceptual site models and to plan cost effective site characterization to support Risk Assessment. 2007 — 2010 Environmental Risk Analyst Il. Intrinsik Environmental Sciences Inc. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Conducted environmental and human health risk assessment projects, including ecological and human exposure RAs for contaminated sites and industrial emissions and effluents. Duties included: chemical fate and transport, human health and ecological exposure modelling, reaction chemistry in consumer product support, statistical analysis of environmental data, screening data against regulatory guidelines, report writing, data analysis, literature reviews; and, development of property -specific standards. Mark Beasy, M. Sc., QPRA Page 263 Page No. 1 CAMBIUM EDUCATION & TRAINING 1996 Master of Science in Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario 1992 Combined Honours Bachelor of Science in Mathematics and Chemistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia PEER AND TECHNICAL REVIEW • Senior Peer Reviewer for projects to support land conveyances (and RSC filing) from private properties to the City of Toronto (2015 to 2019). • Senior technical reviewer for more than a hundred risk assessment, toxicology, soil vapour and indoor air assessment reports for a variety of sites including redevelopment properties, vacant lands, novel chemical manufacturers/users and federal properties. SELECTED EXPERIENCE Mr. Beasy has completed numerous Environmental Risk Assessments on contaminated sites, ranging from Due Diligence RAs to risk -based Opinion Letters to Tier 3 RAs conducted under O.Reg. 153/04 for the purpose of filing a Record of Site Condition (RSC). Select RA projects are provided below. ART GALLERY PROPERTY RISK ASSESSMENT — THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO Tier 3 RA of a Site impacted by metals, PHCs, VOCs and PAHs. No risks are anticipated with implementation of Risk Management. Site -specific risk -based soil standards were developed where naturally elevated levels of metals are present in region. RSC filed for mixed parkland and institutional use. RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY RISK ASSESSMENT - TORONTO, ONTARIO Modified Generic Risk Assessment (MGRA) of a Site impacted by VOCs and inorganics. Inorganic impacts in groundwater at depth were attributed to natural sources using a novel analytical approach. RSC filed for residential use. RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTY RISK ASSESSMENT - OTTAWA, ONTARIO Tier 3 RA of a Site impacted by PHCs and chlorinated VOCs as a result of historical commercial operations. The RA concluded that no risks are anticipated based on the implementation of recommended risk management and implementation of a vapour sampling program to minimize risk management costs while achieving acceptance with MECP. An RSC will be obtained for the property under O. Reg. 153/04. Mark Beasy, M. Sc., QPRA Page 264 Page No. 2 CAMBIUM COMMERCIAL PROPERTY RISK ASSESSMENT - TORONTO, ONTARIO Tier 3 RA of a Site primarily impacted by PHCs, chlorinated VOCs and semi -volatile parameters as a result of historical industrial operations. The RA concluded that no risks are anticipated based on the implementation of recommended risk management (including vapour mitigation system in newly constructed building) and implementation of ongoing groundwater and air monitoring to minimize risk management costs while achieving acceptance with MECP. An RSC will be obtained for the property under O. Reg. 153/04. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY RISK ASSESSMENT - MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO Tier 3 RA of a Site primarily impacted by PAHs, PHCs and chlorinated VOCs as a result of historical commercial operations. The RA concluded that no risks are anticipated based on the implementation of recommended risk management (including soil vapour extraction system in existing plaza) and implementation of ongoing groundwater and air monitoring to minimize risk management costs while achieving acceptance with MECP. RSC filed for commercial use. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY RISK ASSESSMENT— YORKTON, SASKATCHEWAN Contaminated Site RA of a property owned and operated by a First Nations group. Site primarily impacted by PHCs as a result of historical commercial operations. As Site is owned and operated by a First Nations group, federal guidelines and standards were required. No risks were anticipated with implementation of risk management. DUE DILIGENCE RISK ASSESSMENTS — VARIOUS LOCATIONS Project Manager responsible for numerous Due Diligence Risk Assessments (DDRAs), primarily for support of environmental site assessments related to property financing and transactional agreements. These are typically conducted in general accordance with O.Reg. 153/04 based on client needs and defined scope, for assessment of risk to human health and the environment. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY RISK ASSESSMENT— YORKTON, SASKATCHEWAN Contaminated Site RA of a property owned and operated by a First Nations group. Site primarily impacted by PHCs as a result of historical commercial operations. As Site is owned and operated by a First Nations group, federal guidelines and standards were required. No risks were anticipated with implementation of risk management. FEDERAL SITE -SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENT — NORTHERN ONTARIO Federal Site -Specific Risk Assessment (SSRA) for hydrometric station in northern Ontario. The SSRA evaluated risks to human health and the environment as a result of mercury impacts in on -Site soils related to spills associated Mark Beasy, M. Sc., QPRA Page 265 Page No. 3 CAMBIUM M with manometer use. The SSRA was conducted based on identified receptors (including First Nations) and exposure pathways, evaluating both short- and long-term exposures, where appropriate. Mark Beasy, M. Sc., QPRA Page 266 Page No. 4 Attachment 4 to PDS-047-24 Municipality of Clarington Parks, Recreation, and Culture Master Plan Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary Report Figure 1: Participation in Parks, Recreation and Culture Activities in the Past Five Years (n=3,188) Enjoying parks and open spaces Attending a community event Walking or hiking for leisure Enjoying or using the Clarington waterfront Visit a farmers market Visited a public library (in -person or online) Swimming (instructional, recreational, aqua -fit) Borrowed a book / material from a library Use of playground equipment Use of splash pad Dog walking (on or off leash) Indoor hockey, ringette, figure skating, or ice... Aerobic, yoga, or fitness programs Attend a concert / live music show Gardening Cycling or mountain biking Visit a museum or heritage centre Baseball or softball (or other forms) Weight training Arts and crafts program Camp programs Attend a live theatre show Outdoor recreational skating Attending a storytime program Visited an art gallery Gymnastics Drama, dance, or music program Organized Older Adult 55+ Programs Outdoor tennis Volleyball Basketball Outdoor pickleball Teen programs Football or rugby Disc golf Cricket Outdoor bocce Lawn bowling Neutral and don't know responses not shown. 70% 66% 66% 63% 61% 57% 54% 53% 50% 45% 42% 41% 38% 36% 31% 26% 22% 21% 21% 20% 19% 15% 14% 12% 11% 11% 10% 9% 8% 8% 8% 7% 5% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% Page 267 rA Attachment 5 to PDS-047-24 Municipality of Clarington Parks, Recreation, and Culture Master Plan Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary Report Figure 9: Support for Additional Public Investment in Parks, Recreation and Culture Facilities (n= 2,482 to 2,515) Clarington waterfront Paved multi -use trails Acquisition of parks and open space Indoor pools Unpaved nature trails Outdoor ice rink / trail Playgrounds Fitness centres Indoor multi -use sports dome Space for community events Splash pads Dedicated youth centres Arenas (indoor ice) Indoor walking track Gymnasiums Outdoor swimming pools Therapy pools Outdoor education space Community gardens Library branches Outdoor soccer fields Outdoor fitness equipment Indoor space for large special events Arts and crafts program rooms Dedicated 55+ centres Outdoor basketball courts Heritage buildings Community halls and meeting spaces Outdoor reading garden Outdoor tennis courts Performing arts space Baseball or softball diamonds Performing art spaces Museums Sports field for football and rugby Off -leash dog parks Outdoor pickleball courts Skateboard parks Outdoor lacrosse boxes Disc golf course Cricket fields Strongly Support or Somewhat Support 5% 7% 7% 5% 5% 5% 12% 9% 6% 13% 9% 8% 12% 11% 10% 14% 13% 12% 9% 10% 14% 13% 15% 12% 12% 18% 13% 16% 12% 20% 15% 17% 17% 27% 28% Strongly Opposed or Somewhat Opposed 14 Page 268 Clarftwn Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: November 4, 2024 Report Number: LGS-035-24 Submitted By: Rob Maciver, Deputy CAO/Solicitor, Legislative Services Reviewed By: Authored By: File Number: Mary -Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution#: Lindsey Turcotte, Committee Coordinator By-law Number: Report Subject: Appointment to the Property Standards Committee Recommendations: 1. That Report LGS-035-24, and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That the resignation of Patricia Brazeau, be received; 3. That the Committee consider the applications for appointments to the Property Standards Committee, and that the vote be conducted to appoint the citizen representatives, in accordance with the Appointment to Boards and Committees Policy; and 4. That all interested parties listed in Report LGS-035-24, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 269 Municipality of Clarington Report LGS-035-24 Report Overview Page 2 This report is intended to provide background information, regarding the vacancy on the Property Standards Committee to assist in the appointment process. 1. Property Standards Committee Background 1.1 At the September 9, 2024, General Government Committee (GGC) meeting, Committee appointed Patricia Brazeau to the Property Standards Committee. 1.2 On September 28, 2024, Patricia Brazeau respectfully declined the appointment. Therefore, Committee may appoint one member to the Property Standards Committee. 1.3 All other applicants brought forward at the September 9, 2024, GGC meeting have been contacted again to see if they still wish to be considered for appointment to the Property Standards Committee. The following are the applicants for Committee's consideration: • Brian Atkins • Derek Hannan • Mahendra Bhan Persaud =e=1:10101 0 07 • Rob Box • Lesley Bakshiev • Darlyn Johnson 1.4 In accordance with the "Appointment to Boards and Committees Policy", a confidential application package has been attached, as Attachment 1. 2. Financial Considerations In 2024, Property Standards Committee members receive a remuneration of $55.15 per meeting. Page 270 Municipality of Clarington Report LGS-035-24 3. Strategic Plan L.4.1: Increase opportunities for civic engagement and public participation. 4. Concurrence Not Applicable. 5. Conclusion Page 3 It is respectfully recommended that Committee consider the vote to make the appointment to the Property Standards Committee for a term ending December 31, 2026, or until a successor is appointed. Staff Contact: Lindsey Turcotte, Committee Coordinator, 905-623-3379 ext. 2106 or LTurcotte@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Confidential Application Package (Distributed under Separate Cover) Interested Parties: The following interested parties will be notified of Council's decision: All applicants Property Standards Committee Page 271