HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-65-96DN: oev95015.GPATHE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
P- , Q T �'1 `j03-c)
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File # _ C) I'S
Date: Monday May 6, 1996 Res. # a2le-W,
Report #: PD -65 -96 File #: 18T -95030 (X -REF: DEV 95 -015) By -law #
Subject: PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND ZONING BY -LAW AMENDMENT
APPLICANT: MARCHETTI & DEMINICO
PART LOT 9, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE
(Southwest corner of Mearns Avenue and the CPR Line)
FILE: 18T -95030 and DEV 95 -015
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD -65 -96 be received;
2. THAT the proposed Plan of Subdivision 18T -95030 dated revised March 1996, as
Red -line revised (see Attachment No. 2) be APPROVED subject to the conditions
contained in this Report;
3. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized, by By -law, to execute a Subdivision
Agreement between the Owner and the Municipality of Clarington at such time as
the agreement has been finalized to the satisfaction of the Director of the Public
Works and Director of Planning;
4. THAT the attached amendment to By -law 84 -63 be APPROVED and that the
"Holding (H)" symbol be removed by By -law upon execution of a Subdivision
Agreement;
5. THAT a copy of this Report and Council's decision be forwarded to the Region
of Durham Planning Department; and
6. THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of
Council's decision.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 Applicant: Marchetti & DeMinico
4-'8
...2
REPORT • PD-65-96 PAGE
1.2 Agent: Tunney Planning Inc.
1.3 Rezoning Application: from "Agricultural (A)" to permit the
development of a proposed Plan of
Subdivision.
1.4 Proposed Plan of Subdivision: total of 192 units consisting of 121 single family
dwelling units, 42 semi - detached /link units, 29
on- street townhouse units.
1.5 Land Area: 11.989 ha (29.6 acres)
2. LOCATION
2.1 The subject lands front on the west side of Mearns Avenue immediately south of
the C.P.R. line, north of Ireland Street and east of Elephant Hill Drive in
Bowmanville. The property is further described as Part Lot 9, Concession 2,
former Town of Bowmanville.
3. BACKGROUND:
3.1 Application was filed for a proposed plan of subdivision (18T- 95030) and rezoning
application (DEV 95 -015). The subject parcel is the last significant parcel of land
within the Apple Blossom neighbourhood, not currently subject of a development
application. The neighbourhood is bounded by the CPR line, Liberty Street,
Concession Street and the Soper Creek.
3.2 The Public Meeting for the subject applications was held on September 5, 1995.
Although a number of individuals had enquired with respect to the development
only one person spoke at the meeting. Mr Bellman expressed a concern that this
development may interfere with his well. No other concerns or objection to the
application was raised. Condition 17 of the attached conditions of Draft Approval
requires the applicant, at his expense, to connect the affected party to municipal
water supply or provide a new well or private water system.
...3
REPORT PAGE
4.1 The existing site is currently vacant.
4.2 Surrounding land uses are as follows:
South: new residential subdivisions
East: vacant lands subject to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision (18T-
88037).
North: C.P.R. line and vacant lands subject to Draft Approved Plan of
Subdivision (18T- 89064).
West: new residential subdivision
5 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
5.1 Within the Durham Regional Official Plan the subject property is designated
"Living Area ". Said designation shall permit the development of communities with
defined boundaries, incorporating the widest possible variety of housing types,
sizes and tenure. The proposal appears to conform.
5.2 Within the former Town of Newcastle Official Plan the subject property is located
within Neighbourhood 1 D" of the Bowmanville Urban area and is designated "Low
Density Residential ". Within the neighbourhood, there is a medium density
symbol as well as a "Junior Elementary School symbol" which has not been
reflected in any of the existing or approved developments. In response to these
applications and the preparation of the Clarington Official Plan, the Separate
School Board advised they no longer require a school site within the
neighbourhood. The application generally conforms with the policies of the low
density residential designation and the 5000 person population target.
...4
r� C_
REPORT • PD-65-96 P A I
5.3 The Council adopted Clarington Official Plan designates the subject lands as
"Urban Residential" with a "medium" density symbol in the Apple Blossom
neighbourhood (neighbourhood No. 6). The proposal appears to comply with the
neighbourhood population target. Furthermore, the net density of the proposed
subdivision, 22.7 uph, is below the 30 units per net ha for low density residential
areas. The proposed 29 townhouse units are within the amount permitted by the
medium density symbol.
• r
6.1 The current zoning on the subject property is "Agricultural (A)" which would not
permit the development of the proposed Plan of Subdivision.
7. AGENCY COMMENTS
7.1 In accordance with departmental procedure the subject application was circulated
to a number of agencies and departments for comment. Comments received
from the Regional Planning Department, Clarington Hydro, Bell Canada and
Canada Post have provided no objection to proposal as submitted.
7.2 The Public Works Department, Engineering Division, have reviewed the
applications along with the supporting documentation and have advised they have
no objection to the proposal subject to conditions of approval. The preliminary
design for the earth berm, to be used for noise mitigation, is acceptable in
principle only. The applicant's engineer must satisfy the Director of Public Works
that the earth berm can be constructed within the limit of the lots while achieving
the noise attenuation measures prescribed in the mitigation report. It was further
requested that lots 125 to 138 inclusive be designed as front splits in order to
minimize the height of the berm.
...5
551
REPORT PD-65-96 PAGE 9
7.3 The subject lands form part of the West Branch of the Soper Creek watershed.
Stormwater management for this development has been oversized downstream
to accommodate these lands. The oversizing includes both a stormwater
management pond and storm sewer oversizing. In accordance with the
Development Charges Act a Front End Agreement for the stormwater
management pond has been executed and registered against title of this property
as a benefitting owner. Front End Agreements for the oversized storm sewers
in 40M -1688 and 40M -1676 have not been completed. Therefore although
services have been constructed to accommodate the proposal, connection to the
storm sewer and payment of the oversizing is not possible at this time.
7.4 Other comments from the Engineering Division relate to the Municipality's
standard conditions of approval and the developer's obligations financial and
otherwise.
7.5 The Public Works Department, Parks Division advised they have no objection to
the application subject to a cash -in -lieu of park land dedication in accordance
with the policies of the Official Plan. As well, fencing was requested to separate
Block 155 from the CPR lands.
7.6 The Municipality's Fire Department advised that this site falls within the response
area of Station No. 1, Bowmanville. They suggested that travelling through the
downtown, which is necessary based on the location of this site, is increasingly
difficult for emergency vehicles. The comments recommended "that some resolve
be found to lessen the congestion on King Street ".
7.7 Regional Works advised that municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to
the site and have no objection to further processing of this proposal subject to
conditions of approval.
552
In
REPORT PD-65-96 PAGE N
.
7.8 The Public School Board has advised that the proposal will yield approximately
65 students. These students will be required to attend Vincent Massey Public
School which is over capacity with six potables. The Board has reserved a site
on the east side of Mearns Ave (18T- 88037), however, there is no time frame for
development of this site. The School Board has concerns that "the development
of the subject lands shall be staged in accordance with the availability of
satisfactory school accommodation."
7.9 The Separate School Board advised that they will be constructing a new school
site on Longworth Avenue, west of Middle Road, as a result they have decided
to release their claim to an elementary school site on the subject lands. Similarly
a school site was not requested in the subject neighbourhood through the Official
Plan process. The School Board has no objection to the proposal.
7.10 The Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Recreation has provided comments advising
the subject property has a high potential for causing impacts to cultural heritage
resources. Consequently the Ministry has recommended that as a condition of
approval a cultural heritage resource assessment take place prior to any
development of the property.
7.11 The Ministry of the Environment and Energy reviewed the application and
supporting noise mitigation report and advised that the report adequately
demonstrates the feasibility of achieving the Ministry's sound level limits within the
limits of the proposal. As a result the Ministry has no objection subject to
conditions of approval.
7.12 Ministry of Natural Resources advised that negative effects on downstream water
quality, fish and fish habitat could occur without proper stormwater management
and erosion and sedimentation control measures on site both during and after
construction. The Ministry has no objection subject to conditions of approval, to
address stormwater management. ...7
553
REPORT
7.13 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority advised that the subject lands
are within the area subject to stormwater management recommendations of the
Soper Creek, West- tributary Master Drainage Plan (MDP). The stormwater
management strategy for this development is partially implemented. Overland
flow routes through the adjacent (built) developments are also partially in place.
Accordingly this proposal must be consistent with the continued implementation
of the drainage system outlined in the MDP. Overland flow cannot be directed
east to Mearns Avenue, due to certain overland flow conveyance limitations.
Authority Staff are now satisfied that the proposals can be developed in
conformity with the MDP requirements and therefore have no objection to the
proposal subject to conditions.
7.14 C.P.R. Rail Systems provided comments advising that thy are not in favour of
residential developments adjacent to their right -of -way. However, if this proposal
is supported by the Municipality they have requested a number of conditions of
approval be imposed. The conditions requested speak to the issue of noise
attenuation measures, clauses to be contained in the purchase and sale
agreements, setback requirements and property line fencing.
8. STAFF COMMENTS
8.1 The applicant has made a number of revisions to the proposal in order to address
various agency concerns. The application is now proposing to develop 192 units
on the 11.989 ha. This is a decrease of 9 units from the original submission.
With the exception of future intensification type development, all lands within the
Apple Blossom neighbourhood will now be completely built or subject to draft
approved plans.
8.2 As this property abuts both a railway line and a designated arterial road a noise
study was submitted in support of the application. The study concluded that a
...8
554
.-.O PD-65-96 PAGE 8
noise barrier 5.5 metres above the top of railway track is required along the north
limits of the subdivision. The Mearns Avenue frontage also requires noise barrier
deceasing from 5.5 metres at the north limits to 3.5 metres north of Elephant Hill
Drive. The applicant has demonstrated how an earth berm can be created to
satisfy the noise requirements, with acceptable engineering standards. Noise
attenuation is also required on lots flanking Mearns Avenue. The Municipality will
not accept noise fences to be built in excess of 2.0 metres.
8.3 The road design for this plan of subdivision has been predominantly established
based on surrounding existing and draft approved plans of subdivision. One of
the revisions proposed by the applicant in the last submission, included removal
of a section of road between Street A and Street B, parallel to Mearns Avenue.
Staff believe that the service road, between Street A and Street B, should be
maintained. Extension of this service road will allow for a modified grid design
for the proposal and ease traffic movement to the proposed lots on Street A, as
well as eliminate the temporary cul -de -sac. Although connection from Street A to
Ireland Street, to the south, is anticipated at some point in the future, this requires
development of a one acre parcel of land and removal of an existing house.
There are no applications on the one acre parcel and therefore no timeframe for
the connection to be completed. The Engineering Division of the Public Works
Department advised that they do not consider the current road design appropriate
as it is providing a cul -de -sac for an indefinite timeframe, which is contrary to a
Council directive, and hinders winter maintenance operations. In addition,
temporary access to Mearns Avenue in this location was not deemed appropriate.
The Fire Department also verbally expressed a concern with the street design in
consideration of the length of the temporary cul -de -sac (Street A) and preferred
to see the connection between Street A and Street B reinstated.
8.4 As a result of the above observations, staff proposed a red -line revision to the
plan. Although the revision impacts the unit mix, the number of units remains
consistent at 192.
555
REPORT
8.5 The application provides for a variety of single- detached, semi - detached /link and
townhouse units. In addition it forms part of a larger neighbourhood with a
balanced mixture of housing form. Staff are satisfied that the application
conforms with the intent of the Provincial Housing Policy.
In consideration of the submissions received from the different Departments and
circulated agencies, and based on the comments contained within said report, it
is recommended that the application for proposed plan of subdivision 18T- 95030,
as red -line revised, be approved subject to the conditions of draft approval
contained in Attachment No. 3 hereto. It is further recommended that rezoning
application DEV 95 -015 be approved as contained in the attached by -law.
Respectfully submitted,
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Director of Planning
and Development
CP *FW *jip
26 April 1996
Reviewed by,
4fi
W. H. Stockwell
Chief Administrative
Officer
Attachment No. 1 -
Key Map
Attachment No. 2 -
Conditions of Draft Approval
Attachment No. 3 -
Red -line Revised Plan of Subdivsion
Attachment No. 4 -
Zoning By -law Amendment
...10
556
REPORT NO.: PD-65-96 PAGE 1A
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
George Bellman
427 Mearns Avenue
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario
L1 C 3K5
Mrs. Emily Marchetti and
Mr. Anthony DeMinico
111 Botfield Avenue
ETOBICOKE, Ontario
M4B 4E6
Tunney Planning Inc.
340 Byron Street South, Ste 200
WHITBY, Ontario
L1 N 4P8
557
ATTACHMENT #1
558
ATTACHMENT ,#2
..
PLAN IDENTIFICATION
That this approval applies to draft Plan of Subdivision 18T -95030 prepared by
Tunney Planning Inc. dated revised March 1996, and further revised in red as per
the attached plan, showing 118 lots for single family detached dwellings, 21 lots
for semi - detached or linked dwellings (42 units), 6 blocks for 32 townhouse units,
and various blocks for future development, reserves and road widenings.
Ig
2. That all streets within the Plan of Subdivision shall be dedicated as public
highway and shown as such on the final plan.
3. That all streets shall be named to the satisfaction of the Municipality of Clarington
and shown on the final plan.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
4. That the Owner shall retain a qualified landscape architect to prepare and submit
a Landscaping Plan to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning
and Development for review and approval. The Landscaping Plan shall reflect the
design criteria of the Municipality as amended from time to time.
5. That the Owner shall retain a professional engineer to prepare and submit a
Master Drainage and Lot Grading Plan to the Director of Public Works for review
and approval. All plans and drawings must conform to the Municipality's Design
Criteria as amended from time to time.
6. That the Owner shall retain a qualified consultant to prepare and submit a Tree
Preservation plan to the Director of planning and Development for review and
approval.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
7. That the Owner shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Municipality and
agree to abide by all terms and conditions of the Municipality's standard
subdivision agreement, including, but not limited to, the requirements that follow.
8. That all easements, road widening, and reserves as required by the Municipality
shall be granted to the Municipality free and clear of all encumbrances.
559
W
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
9. That the Owner shall pay to the Municipality at the time of execution of the
subdivision agreement, cash -in -lieu of parkland dedication for residential
development at the rate of either 1 ha per 300 dwelling units or 5% which ever is
greater.
10. That the Owner shall pay to the Municipality, the development charge in
accordance to the Development Charge By -law as amended from time to time,
as well as payment of a portion of front end charges pursuant to the Development
Charge Act if any are required to be paid by the owner.
11. That the Owner shall provide and install sidewalks, street lights, temporary turning
circles etc. as per the Municipality's standards and criteria.
12. That the Owner shall cause all utilities, including, hydro, telephone, Cable TV, etc.
to be buried underground.
13. That the Owner shall provide the Municipality, at the time of execution of the
subdivision agreement unconditional and irrevocable, Letters of Credit acceptable
to the Municipality's Treasurer, with respect to Performance Guarantee,
Maintenance Guarantee, Occupancy Deposit and other guarantees or deposit as
may be required by the Municipality.
14. That the Owner shall adhere to architectural control requirements of the
Municipality.
15. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Owner shall, through its
acoustic engineer, to provide a certification to the Director of Planning, certifying
that the Builder's plans are in accordance with the Noise Control Report as
approved by the Ministry of the Environment, Region of Durham and the
Municipality of Clarington.
16. That prior to the issuance of building permits, access routes to the subdivision
must be provided to meet Subsection 3.2.5.2(6) of the Ontario Building Code and,
that all watermains and hydrants are fully serviced and the Owner agrees that
during construction, fire access routes be maintained according to Subsection
2.5.1.2 of the Ontario Fire Code, storage of combustible waste be maintained as
per Subsection 2.4.1.1 and open burning as per Subsection 2.6.3.4 of the Ontario
Fire Code.
W
WE
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
17. The Owner agrees that where the well or private water supply of any person is
interfered with as a result of construction or the development of the subdivision,
the Owner shall at his expense, either connect the affected party to municipal
water supply system or provide a new well or private water system so that water
supplied to the affected party shall be of quality and quantity at least equal to the
quality and quantity of water enjoyed by the affected party prior to the
interference.
18. That the applicant supply on disk, in a CAD format acceptable to the Municipality
a copy of the proposed Plan of Subdivision as Draft Approved.
19. That the earth berm be constructed on lots 125 -138 of an appropriate design
onsistent with the proposed preliminary design submitted to the Municipality by
Marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd., Consulting Engineers, and as shown on
Marshall Macklin Monaghan drawing, Plan #2, Project No. 10- 95615, dated
March, 1996.
20. That the final design of the berm and subsequent construction be certified by the
appropriate engineer with expertise in the design and construction of earth berms
and satisfactory to the Director of Public Works.
21. That prior to the release of building permits for any lots affected by the
construction of the earth berm (as finally designed) such as Lots 125 -138, that
building permits be withheld until the earth berm is constructed and certified by
the engineer and deemed completed and satisfactory to the Director of Public
Works.
22. That Lots 125 -138 be graded with front to rear drainage with housing type
restricted to front splits, that can reduce the height differential between the lots
and the berm to a maximum of 4 to 4.5 metres in accordance with the
Municipality's Design Standard N -643.
23. The noise barrier transition identified in the Noise and Vibration Impact Study
prepared by H.G.C. Engineering, dated June 30, 1995, in the vicinity of Lots 136
to 138 be further clarified to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works, prior
to construction.
24. The noise barrier transition between the proposed plan of subdivision and the
existing noise mitigation measures on the lands to the west in Plan 10M -830 be
clarified to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works prior to construction.
561
E
A01 O 10111 Lei k S A■ ► ► i 1.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
25. That where a fence is used for noise attenuation, that the fence have a maximum
height of 2.0 metres.
26. The applicant is required to make a road connection for this plan of subdivision
to the existing Elephant Hill Drive in Plan 10M -830 to the west. This work will
necessitate the removal of the existing temporary turning circle on Elephant Hill
Drive and completing the existing temporary turning circle to a finished urban
roadway including such items as catchbasins, asphalt paving, curb and gutter,
sodded boulevard and sidewalk. This road connection work is at the total costs
of the developer of Plan 18T- 95030.
27. That all future lots or development blocks (Part Blocks 149 to 152 inclusive), or
lands abutting the roads within this plan of subdivision that may be developed in
the future, are fully serviced with sanitary, water, storm sewer, hydro etc., in
conjunction with the servicing of this development.
28. The subdivision agreement must contain appropriate provision for the installation
of service connections, entrances, curbs and other related boulevard works on
Ireland Street which shall serve as a direct connection to Lots 1 -8 of the proposed
draft plan. The cost will be borne 100% by the applicant and the extent of works
required shall be at the sole discretion of the Director of Public Works.
29. That final approval of this plan of subdivision be deferred until such time that the
necessary Front Ending Agreements for the reimbursement of oversized services
are executed between the Municipality and the front end developer, and the
agreements are registered against title to these lands.
30. That the developer is required, as a condition of the development agreement, to
make the front end payments to the Municipality for the amount stated in the front
end agreements entered into between the Municipality and:
i) Schickedanz Brothers Ltd. (Stormwater Management Works)
ii) The Owner of Plan 40M -1688 (Storm Sewer Oversizing)
iii) The Owner of Plan 40M -1676 (Storm Sewer Oversizing)
31. The development agreement will provide appropriate clauses detailing the front
end payment, timing, amount, and in accordance with the provisions of the
Development Charges legislation, and to the satisfaction of the Municipality's
Solicitor and the Director of Public Works.
562
2M
• N • 1, 11 1 1 1 ! • i A •
32. That the stormwater drainage works (i.e. overland flow) necessary for this
development must be constructed in accordance with the Soper Creek West
Branch Master Drainage Study, prepared by marshall Macklin Monaghan Ltd. and
as finally approved by the Director of Public Works.
33. That the applicant's engineer provides a Lot Grading and Drainage Plan that
details the conveyance of storm drainage, both minor and major systems from
this subdivision. In addition, a site servicing report is required for this plan of
subdivision to identify the needs, location and feasibility of design of the services
proposed.
34. That the future development of Part 2, 10R -568 be configured with lots fronting
on future road link (parallel to Mearns Avenue) from Street 'C' to Ireland Street,
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
35. That the applicant satisfy all the conditions of the Region of Durham Works
Department financially or otherwise.
36. That the applicant satisfy all the conditions of the Northumberland Clarington
Public School Board financially or otherwise.
37. That the applicant satisfy all the conditions of the Central Lake Ontario
Conservation Authority financially or otherwise.
38. That the applicant satisfy all the conditions of the Ministry of Natural Resources
financially or otherwise.
39. That the applicant satisfy all the conditions of the Ministry of Culture, Tourism and
Recreation financially or otherwise.
40. That the applicant satisfy all the conditions of the Region of Durham Works
Department financially or otherwise.
41. That the applicant satisfy all the conditions of Ministry of the Environment and
Energy financially or otherwise.
42. That the applicant satisfy all the conditions of C.P.R. Rail Systems financially or
otherwise.
43. That the applicant satisfy all the conditions of Clarington Hydro Electric
Commission financially or otherwise.
44. That the applicant satisfy all the conditions of Canada Post financially or
otherwise.
563
E AAA - -
5W 51 4 }/y 10 ie 7 to 10 14 tJ U. tl 10 9 , L r 2 3
K PLAOR -568 �KKK1
k r INST. No.
2 1 J 1 I I 5 I 6 1 7 I_ 1 S o e 7 e Io179Q ' II
/27/ \ "✓ IRELAND STREET `"s°LOarlor
`r 16 -TIy -I T I! I I I I-l� -T -T -f -f T o
/25 \1` Ci 1 I �1 121I I I I I I I I ( I I I .---
`i- 10 19 IH 17 i6 i5 I1 IJ 12 II 10 9
_ � � E 1 7rE r�-LA 40 7 88
21
1 AI 251 16 1 27 1 2e 129 ( 30I JI 1 121 JJ I 141 351 36 I J7I JH 1 39140 141 1 47 1 (J 1 (( 1
2D
Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision
IV, �,
(r ,
CONCe1 oN t�sTR
PROPOSED
DRAFT PLAN
Of sUDDIVIsm
PART OF LOT 9, CONCESSION 2,
OEOOOAPNIC 10110491V OF DARIIMOTON
(FORMERLY TOM OF eOWUMV11 E)
MUNICIPAUTY OF CLARINGTON
REGONAL MUNICIPAUTY OF DURHAM
RU"ANT INFORMATION
IDM Dom" Uon 1- M »- NU -el. ei -Ia
x1 •Uarnm o�rurAro/ b - Ixr, i» - Ilt
(»s tors / la UrIRI
ra!«n rawrm 1- asan.0, inn /sri N.nl
fmrum o.a,iujon
ue nwr.as
(lE(MwD OrDLF) (i rArs /2U(nl
uet�nwxrr, m� a- nlu -�xi ton / »r..u)
lsy= xreamoai»m ti tos/ . o.nl
rmnni of»att
arrjs ,e11°'irrrw�r.wuefAloarsw -»a flmm� / »i..v
1
ifttAl I Olels f raww 1
ToxAx. KsoomK AHFA -
PART LOT IDOLS - aaoa ru - I>L - axu M
fun ICSOM - aaan ra • rsa - naa w
ROM M0OKefa
MfVbt uv n aoa - u - ary w
RMN- AEA.R;p63=11 MOON M
i:e„a� ,U ,1 �=.�1� .a �
�e 'L lAAACWW
IA< v;nolia lon• Y.D. DMEs
t. YAAC14T11 puAO Lve clnSlve
Al At- eVH •NON KAwu!
A. r» War -�--
YA6g1 2J. 1f9J' i1MfO1 11. I0Y5'
MARCHETTI /Do MWO MEWS
ELDAD
/ \ 79
r
GAGE I
/ \ \ 79\ ' fILK IIS
Ho
/8,3 I 82 ,
of
\
ax go
V \\ \/ \ /
w
/ 155
\ /!
H9
FA
!i
OLK 97
I �
\ /
(j / 9\
/
\
91
rc �I Hilt 9J 1 BI7C 92
/� . / \/• /
+HIV �' P.- tm
m
\
SIT
PA
cr
1
14 1
a
f 1
"'V
/
lXK 9,K/ 001
\
a•a'ei
t
R
( O
�U
'12
ias
/ /
o it 11 1 4
it
110
OB
100
107
106
/ LLJ ''�
\ 7 i
/
}
w
7
/ Z PmR T
9L i52
s rn
a
�
00
lot
y
tot
10J
f01
OS
I Iilyl
IDlbdcl{IHI
I •I
I U
E AAA - -
5W 51 4 }/y 10 ie 7 to 10 14 tJ U. tl 10 9 , L r 2 3
K PLAOR -568 �KKK1
k r INST. No.
2 1 J 1 I I 5 I 6 1 7 I_ 1 S o e 7 e Io179Q ' II
/27/ \ "✓ IRELAND STREET `"s°LOarlor
`r 16 -TIy -I T I! I I I I-l� -T -T -f -f T o
/25 \1` Ci 1 I �1 121I I I I I I I I ( I I I .---
`i- 10 19 IH 17 i6 i5 I1 IJ 12 II 10 9
_ � � E 1 7rE r�-LA 40 7 88
21
1 AI 251 16 1 27 1 2e 129 ( 30I JI 1 121 JJ I 141 351 36 I J7I JH 1 39140 141 1 47 1 (J 1 (( 1
2D
Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision
IV, �,
(r ,
CONCe1 oN t�sTR
PROPOSED
DRAFT PLAN
Of sUDDIVIsm
PART OF LOT 9, CONCESSION 2,
OEOOOAPNIC 10110491V OF DARIIMOTON
(FORMERLY TOM OF eOWUMV11 E)
MUNICIPAUTY OF CLARINGTON
REGONAL MUNICIPAUTY OF DURHAM
RU"ANT INFORMATION
IDM Dom" Uon 1- M »- NU -el. ei -Ia
x1 •Uarnm o�rurAro/ b - Ixr, i» - Ilt
(»s tors / la UrIRI
ra!«n rawrm 1- asan.0, inn /sri N.nl
fmrum o.a,iujon
ue nwr.as
(lE(MwD OrDLF) (i rArs /2U(nl
uet�nwxrr, m� a- nlu -�xi ton / »r..u)
lsy= xreamoai»m ti tos/ . o.nl
rmnni of»att
arrjs ,e11°'irrrw�r.wuefAloarsw -»a flmm� / »i..v
1
ifttAl I Olels f raww 1
ToxAx. KsoomK AHFA -
PART LOT IDOLS - aaoa ru - I>L - axu M
fun ICSOM - aaan ra • rsa - naa w
ROM M0OKefa
MfVbt uv n aoa - u - ary w
RMN- AEA.R;p63=11 MOON M
i:e„a� ,U ,1 �=.�1� .a �
�e 'L lAAACWW
IA< v;nolia lon• Y.D. DMEs
t. YAAC14T11 puAO Lve clnSlve
Al At- eVH •NON KAwu!
A. r» War -�--
YA6g1 2J. 1f9J' i1MfO1 11. I0Y5'
MARCHETTI /Do MWO MEWS
FA
I
'PAPA
1,
PA
01
—1
E AAA - -
5W 51 4 }/y 10 ie 7 to 10 14 tJ U. tl 10 9 , L r 2 3
K PLAOR -568 �KKK1
k r INST. No.
2 1 J 1 I I 5 I 6 1 7 I_ 1 S o e 7 e Io179Q ' II
/27/ \ "✓ IRELAND STREET `"s°LOarlor
`r 16 -TIy -I T I! I I I I-l� -T -T -f -f T o
/25 \1` Ci 1 I �1 121I I I I I I I I ( I I I .---
`i- 10 19 IH 17 i6 i5 I1 IJ 12 II 10 9
_ � � E 1 7rE r�-LA 40 7 88
21
1 AI 251 16 1 27 1 2e 129 ( 30I JI 1 121 JJ I 141 351 36 I J7I JH 1 39140 141 1 47 1 (J 1 (( 1
2D
Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision
IV, �,
(r ,
CONCe1 oN t�sTR
PROPOSED
DRAFT PLAN
Of sUDDIVIsm
PART OF LOT 9, CONCESSION 2,
OEOOOAPNIC 10110491V OF DARIIMOTON
(FORMERLY TOM OF eOWUMV11 E)
MUNICIPAUTY OF CLARINGTON
REGONAL MUNICIPAUTY OF DURHAM
RU"ANT INFORMATION
IDM Dom" Uon 1- M »- NU -el. ei -Ia
x1 •Uarnm o�rurAro/ b - Ixr, i» - Ilt
(»s tors / la UrIRI
ra!«n rawrm 1- asan.0, inn /sri N.nl
fmrum o.a,iujon
ue nwr.as
(lE(MwD OrDLF) (i rArs /2U(nl
uet�nwxrr, m� a- nlu -�xi ton / »r..u)
lsy= xreamoai»m ti tos/ . o.nl
rmnni of»att
arrjs ,e11°'irrrw�r.wuefAloarsw -»a flmm� / »i..v
1
ifttAl I Olels f raww 1
ToxAx. KsoomK AHFA -
PART LOT IDOLS - aaoa ru - I>L - axu M
fun ICSOM - aaan ra • rsa - naa w
ROM M0OKefa
MfVbt uv n aoa - u - ary w
RMN- AEA.R;p63=11 MOON M
i:e„a� ,U ,1 �=.�1� .a �
�e 'L lAAACWW
IA< v;nolia lon• Y.D. DMEs
t. YAAC14T11 puAO Lve clnSlve
Al At- eVH •NON KAwu!
A. r» War -�--
YA6g1 2J. 1f9J' i1MfO1 11. I0Y5'
MARCHETTI /Do MWO MEWS
-1 , , J,
LDAD \ 79
GArTE ) / \ \ 79` '
E (LK 1I5'
&3 80
92 , BI
\ �\ al
\>
> \ i
\iv
x,
\ /
1 L � � OLN 98 ��0i � —
I I /5G�/ \ e9
97 90
aix 91
x 1
/
LLJ
1
wl t-Y, 1a as
IJ
PNR
\ 12 9OC
1/ \ \ ,
V
'R'
_ QII
3 QII
RII
6 QII
ATTACHMENT #3
Red-line Revisions
� II
I I
I I
QII
QII
Ld I 1
565
A!E /
W
11
CCYJ 570N F SIRE
OP+ C
PROPOSED
DRAFT PLAN
OF SUBDIVISION
PART OF LOT 9, CONCESSION 2,
OEMA NIC TOYMSM OF DAK*Kff 1
(I'MM M.Y MM OF eONMMN %IE)
MUNICIPAUTY OF CLARINGTON
REGIONAL MUNICIPAUTY OF DURHAM
RELEVANT INFORMATION
Ller Dt mwrM
, revnuls ane- SSV- s>, »- e1,¢ -y
([(tram O,La1101 a - 130. I» - 11L
(»51An / 101 wRl
ue�r�m,a�FOrs a -w' (x lars /Lwn)
t me¢uu) (1e tors / »wn)
SOn1m rewr3ax Lars w - L¢
10.M- OfteOm PgIAWj (3 bn/ S wn)
rm<lm am»an
s11m fMll/m - 0.0014 11] - 116 (O w4o�3 /» NOn)
nma, m..ws=3)
1vTAt I IMEia f1a wrs)
MYN, eC9 & N1FA lwM
PART f ar"m
Redo <W611(E - 0.aom 1» 6136 LSa r
mtlWri rlo � Rom - _ un w
10UL LIEL mf 9wesum Il.b M
Itw
OW"E" MrOVATE
PM7
_
�'vw e � ,wawa r.e rw
17
Py
2
wan
Im-
J .DUBS ES
0
q 'KW KA xrc,ww
�glMl 7,NQEL'
IL
a
ywa, U. ,ws•
a
NIMCO MEWS
1 0
s
�
s
s
+
1 0
O.Mya��• I II 103
�ii X11
I
€
1
CAMPLI Gf
� CT 49
3 0
+
3
4a
e
+
el
u
5 s2 7� I
2y
+Pt
20
1 to
7.16
Is
li
1J
12
t€
10
8
F 2c
PL. IOR- 568 %OAI
15+
/ -•
1 5( a l 7 1_
1
3
5
a
7^
a
R INST. No.
101796 1 °
2 1 J 1
1
I
'
2�
S— TR�E7ET "— eTOC
27/
IRELAND
T
—iTi T --Jr
g- /25 \�
I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rlrl
2 7) 10 19 1 1 i8 17 16 /5 /I 1.7 12 II 10 9
c
< � �
iI
T� JA 11 7 88 I I L- Qo
�- f I�I �T � ��I 1 I � � ;a4�lo 1
21
1
o
I 211,,1271- 119 1 I 311 J2) J! I JI 1 35 1 J6 1 J71 JH I J9 110 (III 121 IJ I 41 I ��
1J
ATTACHMENT #3
Red-line Revisions
� II
I I
I I
QII
QII
Ld I 1
565
A!E /
W
11
CCYJ 570N F SIRE
OP+ C
PROPOSED
DRAFT PLAN
OF SUBDIVISION
PART OF LOT 9, CONCESSION 2,
OEMA NIC TOYMSM OF DAK*Kff 1
(I'MM M.Y MM OF eONMMN %IE)
MUNICIPAUTY OF CLARINGTON
REGIONAL MUNICIPAUTY OF DURHAM
RELEVANT INFORMATION
Ller Dt mwrM
, revnuls ane- SSV- s>, »- e1,¢ -y
([(tram O,La1101 a - 130. I» - 11L
(»51An / 101 wRl
ue�r�m,a�FOrs a -w' (x lars /Lwn)
t me¢uu) (1e tors / »wn)
SOn1m rewr3ax Lars w - L¢
10.M- OfteOm PgIAWj (3 bn/ S wn)
rm<lm am»an
s11m fMll/m - 0.0014 11] - 116 (O w4o�3 /» NOn)
nma, m..ws=3)
1vTAt I IMEia f1a wrs)
MYN, eC9 & N1FA lwM
PART f ar"m
Redo <W611(E - 0.aom 1» 6136 LSa r
mtlWri rlo � Rom - _ un w
10UL LIEL mf 9wesum Il.b M
Itw
OW"E" MrOVATE
vtml cotTwrAYE
w�ta^I.�wtw�aoi rawera
�'vw e � ,wawa r.e rw
rs rww�• Iw a .wet
tMNIOEW
KbM¢r w ewat.3 Tw bl�
slow.
wan
Im-
J .DUBS ES
'Chll%"rr1
AS Atr0tl1[Y"
q 'KW KA xrc,ww
�glMl 7,NQEL'
•MUlgl iJ 1�)pe'"
ywa, U. ,ws•
MARCHETTI/De
NIMCO MEWS
ATTACHMENT #4
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY -LAW NUMBER 96-
being a By -law to amend By -law 84 -63, the Comprehensive Zoning By -law for the former
Town of Newcastle.
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington has
recommended approval to the Region of Durham of proposed draft plan of subdivision
18T- 95030, as red -line revised.
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it
advisable to amend By -law 84 -63, as amended, of the former Town of Newcastle to
implement the proposed draft plan of subdivision as red -line revised.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the
Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows:
1. Schedule "3" to By -law 84 -63 as amended, is hereby further amended by
changing the zone designation from:
"Agricultural (A)" to "Urban Residential Type One - Holding ((H)R1) ";
"Agricultural (A)" to "Urban Residential Exception - Holding ((H)R1 -20) ";
"Agricultural (A)" to "Urban Residential Type Two - Holding ((H)R2) ";
"Agricultural (A)" to "Urban Residential Exception - Holding ((H)R2 -9) ";
"Agricultural (A)" to "Urban Residential Type Three - Holding ((H)R3) "; and
"Agricultural (A)" to "Urban Residential Exception - Holding ((H)R3 -8) ";
as shown on the attached Schedule "A" hereto.
2. Schedule "A" attached hereto shall form part of this By -law.
3. This By -law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the
provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act.
BY -LAW read a first time this day of 1996.
BY -LAW read a second time this day of 1996.
BY -LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of
MAYOR
CLERK
566
, 1996.
567
LOT
ZONING -• •
ZONING CHANGE FROM "A"TO "(H)R 1-20"
IL ZONING CHANGE FROM"A"TO"(H)R2"
ZONING CHANGE FROM 'W'TO "(H)R2- 9"
ZONING CHANGE FROM "A:'TO "(H)R3
rear •.!
ZONING CHANGE FROM "A!'TO"(H) R3 -811
• / 11 ta�r�: �.8
ZONING TO REMAIN "All
�j�11'll!I��ILI. ��xY
iJ %j ?j ��%I�'l�i,�ll ��tia�;41SL aocRR
r}F� <�s4Y�CBS�3A<'
6,�.a�", lgg8r7 {I5 A iiIry��y{{
l7��fAir.'rtS7f��i:
cr
0 25 50 ..
Mayor 50 0 Clerk
SUBJECT SITE
LOT 10 LOT 9
LOT
..
�.�
�.
♦
•
�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIP
11111111111111111111�
!
111
�
.�_ 111•
� -_ ._ d11U 111 i, �- IIIIIIIIII -e
��_ �__ 1111111111 �� nllilllllllll
•
�
(�)
�,���
11111����= �p11111111
-
BOWMANVILLE
IIII /G C
-= �Ipp=
567