HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/22/1999 MUNICIPALITY OF
((?Iarington
ONTARIO
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
DATE: MARCH 22, 1999
TIME: 9:30 A.M.
PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1 . ROLL CALL
2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
3. MINUTES
(a) Minutes of a Regular Meeting of March 1, 1999 301
i
4. PRESENTATION — 10:30 A.M.
(a) Mr. W.D. Armstrong, Kitchen and Armstrong, 1248 Keewatin
Boulevard, Peterborough, K9H 6X3 — Governance Issues
5. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
(a) PD-23-99 - Ontario Municipal Board Pre-Hearing
Conference Amendment No. 49 to the
Durham Regional Official Plan
Amendment No. 9 to the Clarington
Official Plan Proposed Zoning By-law
Amendment 98-118 Proposed Severance
LD 327/98, Paula Lishman International
Limited 601
(b) PD-24-99 - Monitoring of the Decisions of the Committee
of Adjustment for the Meeting of
February 25, 1999 605
(c) PD-25-99 - Certificate of Release, Fridel Limited
Subdivision 40M-1763 612
(d) PD-26-99 - Certificate of Release, Lord Elgin
Building Corporation Subdivision 40M-1764 619
(e) PD-27-99 - Application for Removal of Holding
George Pollitt on behalf of Leslie and
Evelyn Colvin, Part Lot 35, Concession 2.
Former Township of Darlington 626
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET • 80WMANVILLE -ONTARIO • LiC 3A6 • (905) 623-3379 • FAX 623-4169 RECYCLED Phi
G.P.& A. Agenda - 2 - March 22, 1999
6. CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
(a) CD-12-99 - Animal Services Monthly Report
for the Month of February 1999 701
(b) CD-13-99 - Parking Enforcement Report for the
Month of February, 1999 703
7. TREASURY DEPARTMENT
i
(a) TR-9-99 - Co-operative Tender CL99-1, Traffic Sign
Requirements 801
i
(b) TR-10-99 - Quotation Q98-12, Balcony Replacement
Bowmanville Museum 808
(c) TR-1 1-99 - Public Sector Salary Disclosure Act 810
I
(d) TR-12-99 - Community Services Recreation Software 811
(e) TR-13-99 - Early Tender Calls 832
i
8. FIRE DEPARTMENT
I
(a) FD-6-99 - Monthly Fire Report — February 1999 901
(b) FD-7-99 - CANATEX 3 Exercise — April 27, 28
and 29, 1999 905
9. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
No Reports
i
10. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
(a) WD-14-99 - Monthly Report on Building Permit
Activity for February, 1999 1101
(b) WD-15-99 - Northeast Bowmanville Subdivision
Phase 1, Plan 10M-840, Bowmanville
'Certificate of Acceptance', Tributary
Stormwater Management Works
Exclusive of the Soper Creek Erosion
Works 1108
G.P.& A. Agenda - 3 - March 22, 1999
11 . ADMINISTRATION
No Reports
12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
13. OTHER BUSINESS
14. ADJOURNMENT
I
i
THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
General Purpose and Administration Committee March 1, 1999
Minutes of a meeting of the General Purpose and
Administration Committee held on Monday,
March 1, 1999 at 9:30 a.m., in the Council
Chambers.
ROLL CALL
Present Were: Mayor D. Hamre
Councillor J. Mutton
Councillor M.Novak
Councillor J. Rowe
Councillor J. Schell
Councillor C.Trim
Councillor T. Young
i
Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu
Director of Community Services,J.Caruana
Acting Director of Planning and Development,D. Crome
Fire Chief, M.Creighton
i Treasurer, M. Marano
Director of Public Works, S.Vokes
Deputy Clerk, M. Knight Stanley
I
Mayor Hamre chaired this portion of the meeting.
DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest.
The Treasurer introduced Mr. Dana Houes, recently appointed Tax Collector of the
Municipality of Clarington and formerly employed by the Region of Durham.
MINUTES
Resolution#GPA-90-99
Moved by Councillor Schell,seconded by Councillor Trim
i
THAT the minutes of a regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration
Committee held on February 15, 1999,be approved.
ii
"CARRIED"
i
301
G.P. &A. Minutes -2- March 1, 1999
PRESENTATION
(a) George Dark, Urban Strategies Inc.,257 Adelaide Street West,Toronto, M5H 1X9
re: Report PD-21-99-referred to the"Urban Design Principles and Guidelines for
Bowmanville West Main Central Area and West Bowmanville Gateway"dated
February 1999,prepared by Urban Strategies Inc.,previously circulated to Members of
the Committee. With of an overhead projector, Mr. Dark highlighted the diverse range
of land uses including commercial, institutional,residential and community comprised
in the Bowmanville West Main Central Area and answered questions from the
Committee.
DELEGATIONS
(a) Bob Martindale,Clarington Place,23 Elizabeth Street,Ajax,LIT 2X1
re: Report PD-21-99-advised that,although the applicant has not had the
opportunity to review the final recommendations of Report PD-21-99, he
supports the recommendations contained in the report. He,however,expressed
one concern pertaining to the proposed massing on Highway 2 between Green
Road and Clarington Boulevard. He stated that there should be a much wider
gap between the buildings because vehicular traffic travelling along Highway 2
will not be able to see behind the units and,therefore,have the perception that
there is no parking available behind these buildings. He wants to work with
staff to find a suitable compromise to solve this matter.
(b) Bryce Jordan,G.M.Sernas Limited, 110 Scotia Court Unit 41,Whitby
LIN 8Y7-advised prior to the meeting the he would not be in attendance.
Councillor Novak chaired this portion of the meeting.
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Urban Design Resolution#GPA-91-99
Guidelines �(
Moved by Councillor Schell,seconded by Councillor Rowe
THAT Report PD-21-99 be received;
THAT the document"A Framework for Development: Urban Design Principles
and Guidelines for the Bowmanville West Main Central Area and the West
Bowmanville Gateway"as prepared by Urban Strategies Inc. be received;
THAT Staff be authorized to hold a Public Meeting to consider an amendment to
the Clarington Official Plan as proposed in Attachment#3 to Report PD-21-99,
FORTHWITH; and j
THAT the interested parties listed in Report PD-21-99 and any delegation be
advised of Council's decision, FORTHWITH.
"CARRIED"
302
i
i
G.P. &A. Minutes - 3 - March 1, 1999
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONT'D
Removal of Resolution#GPA-92-99
Holding
Sandford Acres Moved by Councillor Trim,seconded by Mayor Hamre
THAT Report PD-22-99 be received;
i
THAT Rezoning Application ZBA 99-003 submitted by Bob Best, on behalf of
Sandford Acres(1987)Ltd.,requesting the removal of the"Holding(H)"symbol
from the subject lands be approved;
THAT the amending By-law attached to Report PD-22-99 be forwarded to Council
for approval;
THAT a copy of Report PD-22-99 and the amending By-law be forwarded to the
Region of Durham Planning Department;and
THAT all interested parties listed in Report PD-22-99 and any delegations be
advised of Council's decision.
i
"CARRIED"
CLERKS DEPARTMENT
i
I
There were no reports considered under this section of the agenda.
Councillor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting.
I
Mayor and Resolution#GPA-93-99
Councillors'
Remuneration Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Rowe
and Expenses
F09. THAT Report TR-8-99 be received for information.
"CARRIED"
FIRE DEPARTMENT
There were no reports considered under this section of the agenda.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
There were no reports considered under this section of the agenda.
Councillor Young chaired this portion of the meeting.
I
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monthly Building Resolution#GPA-94-99
Report for
January, 1999 Moved by Councillor Novak,seconded by Councillor Schell
P 10.MO
THAT Report WD-12-99 be received for information.
"CARRIED"
i
303
G.P. &A. Minutes -4- March 1, 1999
i
� I
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONT'D
Traffic Safety Resolution#GPA-95-99
on Orono Streets
T08.GE Moved by Councillor Rowe,seconded by Councillor Trim
THAT Report WD-13-99 be received;
THAT adult crossing guards,all-way stops and pavement markings not be installed
at the proposed Orono locations;and
THAT Judi Campbell be provided with a copy of Report WD-13-99 to advise her of
the Municipality's Radar Message Board,which may be borrowed from the Public
Works Department.
"CARRIED"
f
Mayor Harare chaired this portion of the meeting.
ADMINISTRATION
i
Marketing, Resolution#GPA-96-99
Tourism&
Economic Moved by Councillor Rowe,seconded by Councillor Schell
Development
Report THAT Report ADMIN-7-99 be received for information.
D06.
"CARRIED AS AMENDED
LATER IN THE MEETING" f
(SEE FOLLOWING AMENDING MOTION)
Resolution#GPA-97-99
Moved by Councillor Schell,seconded by Councillor Trim
THAT the foregoing Resolution#GPA-96-99 be amended by adding the following
wording thereto:
"and that a copy of Report ADMIN-7-99 be forwarded to the Board of Trade,the
Bowmanville B.I.A.,Orono B.I.A.,Newcastle B.I.A. and the Clarington Business
Groups."
"CARRIED"
The foregoing Resolution#GPA-96-99 was then put to a vote and"CARRIED AS
AMENDED",
Clarington Beech Resolution#GPA-98-99
Centre Lease
L04. Moved by Councillor Trim,seconded by Councillor Rowe
i I
THAT Report ADMIN-3-99 be received;
THAT the lease agreement with the Clarington Older Adult Association Inc. for a
ten year term for a nominal fee of$2.00 be approved;
304
G.P. &A. Minutes - 5 - March 1, 1999
ADMINISTRATION CONT'D
THAT the By-law attached to Report ADMIN-3-99 marked Attachment#I be
approved authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to execute the agreement substantially in
the form of the lease agreement to lease with the Clarington Older Adult
Association Inc., and
THAT copies of Report ADMIN-3-99 be forwarded to the Clarington Older Adult
Association Inc.
C
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
George Dark Resolution#GPA-99-99
Presentation
Moved by Councillor Schell,seconded by Councillor Novak
I
THAT the informative presentation by Mr. George Dark pertaining to the Urban
Design Principles and Guidelines for Bowmanville West Main Central Area and
West Bowmanville Gateway,be received with appreciation.
"CARRIED"
OTHER BUSINESS
Private Sewage Resolution#GPA-100-99
Systems
Moved by Councillor Mutton,seconded by Councillor Trim
WHEREAS a report on the Private Sewage Systems in the Hamlet of Orono was
received by the former Town of Newcastle on September 20, 1990;
WHEREAS significant time has elapsed since the report was received;
WHEREAS the report concluded that:
4.l.1 Downtown Core
1. The downtown core is densely developed and as a consequence,at least
74%of the properties have lot sizes and/or ground conditions that preclude
the installation of individual Class 4 or Class 6 private sewage systems.
2. Many of the systems are overloaded and discharge raw sewage to the
surface during periods of heavy use.
3. During periods of rainfall and/or high ground water base flow the surface
waters throughout the downtown core approximate raw sewage.
4. Contaminated runoff water from the downtown core likely contaminates
Wilmot Creek and the branch of Wilmot Creek that flows through the
southern part of the study area.
5. It is apparent that a health risk exists throughout the commercial core of
Orono due to inadequate private sewage systems.
305
G.P. &A. Minutes -6 - March 1, 1999
OTHER BUSINESS CONT'D
4.1.2 Area Surrounding Core
I. A random survey of 75 lots within the area surrounding the core determined
that 20%have lot sizes and/or ground conditions that preclude the
installation of individual Class 4 or Class 6 private sewage systems.
2. During periods of dry weather the Peters Pike,Andrews Road,and David's
Crescent subdivision and the area bounded by Station Street, Sommerville
Drive,Church Street, and Orono Park experience a significant number of
cases of sewage breakout and sewage backup.
i
3. During the periods of rainfall and/or high ground water base flow the
surface waters throughout the area surrounding the core approximate raw
sewage.
I
4. It is apparent that a health risk exists throughout the area surrounding the
core due to inadequate private sewage systems. This risk is more
pronounced within the Peters Pike,Andrews Road,and David's Crescent
subdivision and within the area bounded by Station Street, Sommerville
Drive,Church Street and Orono Park.
For recreational waters,the MOE has established the limits of 100 per 100 ml
volume for fecal coliforms and 20 per 100 ml volume for fecal streptococci. The
MOE has not established limits for E.coli or pseudomonas aeruginosa, however,the
MOE does use a guideline of 23 per 100 ml volume for E.coli,
The levels of contamination in the water sample collected from Wilmot Creek
exceed the limit established for fecal streptococci and the guideline recommended
for E.coli,and also meet the limit established for fecal coliforms. The excessive
levels of pseudomonas aeruginosa also indicate that pathogenic bacteria could be
present. These levels are excessive for a watercourse in which children may play,
therefore,a regular monitoring program should be established and signs posted
prohibiting recreation in the creek whenever excessive levels are present. It is
noted that Orono Park is located approximately 200 m downstream from the
downtown commercial core, and that public washrooms are located approximately
20 m from the creek within Orono Park. A possible cause of the contamination in
Wilmot Creek is surface water runoff from the commercial core and/or the public
washroom leaching bed;
WHEREAS the final recommendation was that the installation of a communal
sanitary sewer system within the downtown core and throughout the area
surrounding the downtown core should be investigated as a means of alleviating the
health risk which exists within the area due to inadequate private sewage system;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Municipality of Clarington
request that the Region of Durham revisit the possibility of health and
environmental problems in the downtown core and the area surrounding the
downtown core of Orono and determine if a communal sanitary sewage system
should move forward on public health grounds and that costs of further
investigation be budgeted for by the Region of Durham.
"CARRIED"
306
G.P. &A. Minutes -7 - March 1, 1999
ADJOURNMENT
Resolution#GPA-101-99
i
i
Moved by Councillor Young, seconded by Councillor Schell j
THAT the meeting adjourn at 11:10 a.m.
"CARRIED"
I
i
MAYOR
i
DEPUTY CLERK
I' I
I �
I
I
i
I
307
i
DN: PD-23-99
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date: Monday, March 22, 1999 Res. #
Report #: PD-23-99 FILE #: DEV 97-058 By-law #
(X-REF: COPA 97-008 & ROPA 97-020)
Subject: ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE
AMENDMENT NO 49 TO THE DURHAM REGIONAL OFFICIAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN
PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT 98-118
PROPOSED SEVERANCE LD 327/98
PAULA LISHMAN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
FILES: DEV 97-058 (X-REF: COPA 97-008 AND ROPA 97-020)
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-23-99 be received;
2. THAT Council provide direction regarding the Municipality's participation at the
scheduled pre-hearing conference on the appeals of the Planning approvals for the
applications submitted by Paula Lishman International Ltd.
I
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 Paula Lishman International Limited submitted the following development
applications:
application ROPA 97-020/D, proposing an amendment to the Durham Regional
Official Plan (DROP) in order to introduce a Rural Employment Area;
® application COPA 97-008, proposing an amendment to the Clarington Official
Plan (COP) in order to implement the requested amendment to the Durham
Regional Official Plan;
application DEV 97-058, proposing an amendment to Comprehensive Zoning
By-law 84-63, of the former Town of Newcastle, in order to implement the two
aforementioned Official Plan amendments; and,
601
REPORT NO.: PD-23-99 PAGE 2
® application LD 327/98 proposing to sever, from the applicant's total land
holdings, the lands to which the various amendments would apply.
1.2 The approval of these applications have been appealed to the Ontario Municipal
Board (OMB) by the following parties:
Amendment No. 49 to the DROP: Linda Gasser
Bill Woods
Robert and Jean Kingsley
Amendment No. 9 to the COP: Tunney Planning on behalf of
Paula Lishman International
Limited
By-law 98-1
18:
y Linda Gasser
Bill Woods
LD 327/98: Robert and Jean Kingsley
Marlene Spruyet
A one day pre-hearing conference has been scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on April 14,
1999 at the Municipal Administrative Centre. The purpose of the pre-hearing
conference is to identify the parties to the hearing, the scope of the issues and the
time required for a hearing. The Board will then issue procedural directions for the
parties.
1 .3 In 1989, Council adopted a policy which requires a developer to pay the
Municipality's legal costs for participating in OMB Hearings when the Municipality
was supportive of the development proposal. The policy is as follows:
"THAT the applicant/owner of all development applications shall be required to
bear the Town's legal cost for an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing in situations
where his application is either approved or recommended for approval by Town
Council; and
602
REPORT NO.: PD-23-99 PAGE 3
THAT prior to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, the applicant shall provide a
Letter of Undertaking to the Director of Planning and Development agreeing to bear
the Town's legal cost in the ensuring Board's Hearing. In the event the applicant
fails to do so, the Director reserves the right not to participate in any Ontario
Municipal Board Hearing in support of the applicant."
1 .4 In January of 1999, the Acting Director of Planning forwarded a letter to Bill
Lishman of Paula Lishman International Limited advising of the policy and asking
Mr. Lishman to submit a Letter of Undertaking agreeing to reimburse the
Municipality for its legal costs. The letter also indicates that the Municipality
reserves the right to not participate in the OMB Hearing
1 .5 As of the date of this report, Mr. Lishman has not responded and his agent indicated
that his client is not willing to pay for the Municipality's legal cost.
i
2. COMMENTS
2.1 In the case of a minor hearing of a matter where the Municipality approved an
application, the Municipality has generally not been represented by legal counsel.
In these situations, the applicant has subpoenaed planning staff to testify in support
of their application. However, given the significance of the Lishman application for
the Municipality and the possible complexity of such a hearing resulting in
considerable legal costs, it is not appropriate for the Planning Director to make such
a commitment.
2.2 In a complex hearing, there may be subtle differences in positions and there may be
an evolution of positions as the parties work to reach a settlement or scope the
issues to be litigated. In a hearing of this magnitude, it has been the Municipality's
practice to be represented by legal counsel.
2.3 It is not possible for staff to estimate the costs of legal services given that the scope
of the hearing has not been settled.
603
REPORT NO.: PD-23-99 PAGE 4
3. CONCLUSION
3.1 If Council wishes to be represented as a party at the hearing the following
recommendation is proposed:
That staff and the Municipal Solicitor be authorized to appear before the
Ontario Municipal Board at the April 14, 1999 pre-hearing conference and
any subsequent Hearing of the Board in support of Council's decisions with
respect to the various applications.
If Council does not wish to be represented at the upcoming hearing the following
l
resolution should be approved:
That staff and the Solicitor not attend the Ontario Municipal Board pre-
hearing conference on April 14, 1999.
i
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
Davi J Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Acting Director of Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer.
WM*DC*df
11 March 1999
604
DN: PD-24-99
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date: Monday, March 22, 1999 Res. #
Report #: PD-24-99 FILE #: A98/0591 A99/002, By-law #
A99/003 and A99/005
Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF
ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1999
FILES: A98/059, A99/002, A99/003 and A99/005
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-24-99 be received;
2. THAT Council concurs with decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made
February 25, 1999 for applications A98/059, A99/002, A99/003, and A99/005; and
3. THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend
i
the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment for applications A98/059, A99/002
and A99/003 in the event of an appeal.
i
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
I
1 .1 In accordance with Section 45 of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, all applications
received by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled to be heard within
30 days of being received by the Secretary-Treasurer. The decisions of the
Committee are detailed below.
1 .2 Application A98/059 was approved as amended. This application was previously
heard and tabled January 28, 1999. The tabling period was for four weeks and was
to allow the applicant time for discussion with Staff to revise the application. A
consensus was reached, the application revised and the variance was granted.
1.3 Applications A99/002 and A99/003 were approved as applied for.
605
REPORT NO.: PD-24-99 PAGE 2
1 .4 Application A99/005, made by 656150 Ontario Limited with Peter Schewtschenko
as agent, was DENIED. The application was for a reduction in parking spaces from
78 parking spaces as required by the Comprehensive Zoning By-law to 28 parking
spaces, to permit a health club use in the existing plaza.
Although the approval was not consistent with Staff's recommendation, it is Staff's
opinion that it would not be prudent for the Municipality to appeal the application.
The applicant has the opportunity to file an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board
(OMB) if they so wish. In the event of an appeal, Staff may be subpoenaed to
appear at the OMB hearing to give Planning evidence. The Committee of
Adjustment has not always concurred with Staff's recommendation. It has not been
Council's past practice to appeal these decisions leaving that option with the
applicant.
I
1.5 The purpose of each minor variance application and the Committee's decisions are
detailed in Attachment No. 1.
1 .6 With the exception of A99/005, Staff have reviewed the Committee's decisions and
are satisfied that all decisions are in conformity with the Official Plan policies,
consistent with the intent of the Zoning By-law and those approved are minor in
nature and desirable.
1 .7 Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment decisions is required in
order to afford Staff's official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event
of an appeal (last date of appeal March 17, 1999) of any decision of the Committee
of Adjustment.
606
REPORT NO.: PD-24-99 PAGE 3
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
Da id rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Acting irector of Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer.
SL*DC*df
5 March 1999
Attachments -
i
607
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A98/059
APPLICANT: BRUYNSON, NANCY J.
i
AGENT: BRUYNSON, RICHARD W.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION l
6 HILLSIDE DRIVE
PART LOT: 25 CONCESSION: 6
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
i
I
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: RH
i
HEARING DATE : 25-Feb-99
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE : 17-Mar-99
1
MINOR VARIANCE :
TO CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY BUILDING AT 108 SQ M (1163 SQ FT) AND TO
INCREASE THE HEIGHT OF THE ACCESSORY BUILDING FROM THE MAXIMUM OF
5 METRES (16 . 4 FT) TO 7 . 5 METRES .
i
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW, AND IS DEEMED TO BE MINOR AND
DESIRABLE, THAT APPROVAL BE GIVEN FOR AN INCREASE IN HEIGHT TO
6 . 5M IN THE AREA OF THE CRAWL SPACE DOOR.
608
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A99/002
********************
APPLICANT: GAY FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
AGENT : J.D. BARNES LIMITED
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
47 CALECHE AVENUE
PART LOT: 30 CONCESSION: 2
TOWNSHIP: DARLINGTON
PLAN NUMBER: 40M-1939 -5R
ZONING: R1
HEARING DATE : 25-Feb-99
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE : 17-Mar-99
i
I
MINOR VARIANCE :
TO FURTHER REDUCE THE EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 4 . 75 M
(15 . 58 FT) [APPROVED BY A98/0421 , TO 4 . 66 M (15 . 3 FT) .
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAWS AND IS DEEMED TO BE MINOR AND
DESIRABLE, THAT APPROVAL BE GIVEN FOR THE REDUCTION OF THE
EXTERIOR SIDE YARD TO 4 . 66 METRES .
609
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER. A99/003
APPLICANT : HALE, JAMES WILLIAM
i
AGENT : CUREATZ, SAM L.
I
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
4301 WALSH ROAD
i
PART LOT: 18 CONCESSION: 4
TOWNSHIP : CLARKE
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: A-1
HEARING DATE : 25-Feb-99
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE : 17-Mar-99
MINOR VARIANCE :
TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED LOT FRONTAGE FROM 30 M (98 . 4 FT) TO 9 M
(29 . 5 FT) TO PERMIT THE SEVERANCE OF A SURPLUS DWELLING.
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAWS AND IS DEEMED TO BE MINOR AND
DESIRABLE THAT THE REDUCTION IN FRONTAGE TO 9 METRES BE APPROVED
610
i
i
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CAARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A99/005
APPLICANT : 656150 ONTARIO LIMITED
AGENT : SCHEWTSCHENKO, PETER
I
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
1427 KING STREET EAST
PART LOT: 35 CONCESSION: 2
TOWNSHIP : DARLINGTON
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: Cl
I
HEARING DATE : 25-Feb-99
DECISION: DENIED
APPEAL DATE : 17-Mar-99
MINOR VARIANCE :
TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FOR A HEALTH CLUB
USE IN BUILDING C, FROM 78 SPACES TO 35 SPACES .
i
i
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED NOT TO BE MINOR IN NATURE, NOR
DESIRABLE IN NATURE FOR THE AREA, THAT THE APPLICATION BE DENIED.
611
DN: PD-25-99
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date: Monday, March 22, 1999 Res. #
Report #: PD-25 -99 File #: 18T-92010 By-law #
Subject: CERTIFICATE OF RELEASE
APPLICANT: FRIDEL LIMITED
SUBDIVISION 40M-1763
FILE NO.: 18T-92010
Recommendations:
i
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-25-99 be received;
2. THAT pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 5.26 of the Subdivision Agreement
i
between the Municipality and Fridel Limited, the Municipality has no objection to
the issuance of the "Certificate of Release";
3. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized by by-law to execute, on behalf of the
Municipality of Clarington, the "Certificate of Release"; and
4. THAT Fridel Limited be advised of Council's decision.
1. BACKGROUND
1 .1 The Municipality entered into a Subdivision Agreement, registered on title April 21,
1994 with Fridel Limited to develop the lands by plan of subdivision described as
Plan 40M-1763.
1.2 Paragraph 5.36 within the Agreement, entitled "Requirements for Certificate of
Release" states that the Municipality agrees to provide the Owner with a written
release from the Agreement, for the said lands, in a form suitable for registration in
the Registry for the Land Titles Office at such time that the following items have
I
been confirmed.
612
REPORT PD-25-99 PAGE 2
a) The Certificate of Acceptance has been issued for all of the Works;
b) A registered Ontario Land Surveyor, approved by the Municipality, has
provided the Municipality with written confirmation that at a date not earlier
than the end of the maintenance period described herein, he has found or
replaced all standard iron bars as shown on the Plan and survey monuments
at all block corners, the end of all curves, other than corner rounding, and all
points of change in direction of roads on the Plan; and,
c) The Municipal Council has, by resolution, declared that the Owner is not in
default of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
I
The Certificate of Release shall operate as a discharge of the land described therein
of all obligations of the Owner under this Agreement with the exception of the
Owner's responsibility for drainage as provided therein and the Owner's acceptance
of the conditions for applying for municipal building permits as provided therein.
i
1.3 The Subdivision Agreement specifies that the Owner shall reimburse the
Municipality for all reasonable legal expenses incurred, including the preparation of
any release.
I
i
2. STAFF COMMENTS
2.1 The first two requirements, being the issuance of the "Certificate of Acceptance" and
the Municipality's receipt of an Ontario Land Surveyor's confirmation, have been
completed as follows:
Council, at their February 22, 1999 meeting, endorsed Staff Report WD-09-99
and authorized the issuance of a Certificate of Acceptance. The Certificate of
Acceptance was issued by the Public Works Department on February 23, 1999.
613
REPORT PD-25-99 PAGE 3
• The Municipality has received the Ontario Land Surveyor's Certificate for the
Plan
In addition the Public Works Department advises that the requirements of the
Subdivision Agreement have been completed to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works.
2.2 In consideration of the above, Staff prepared the necessary Certificate of Release,
save and except the Owner's responsibility for drainage as provided within the
Agreement and the Owner's acceptance of the conditions for applying for municipal
building permits.
3. RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1 In consideration of the above, Staff would have no objections to the issuance of the
Certificate of Release for Plan 40M-1763.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
Davi . Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Acting Director of Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer
LDT*DJC*cc
March 9, 1999
Attachment No. 1 - Key Map
Attachment No. 2 - By-law
Attachment No., 3 - Release Agreement
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Fridel Limited
c/o 319 College Avenue
P.O. Box 11
Oshawa, Ontario L1 G 7K8
614
ATTACHMENT #1
LOT 32 LOT 31 LOT 30
HIGHWAY way
l I z
W
LU
U
- a U
i
z
LU z N
ZQ � I
Z
Q
I O
STRATHALLAN DRIVE (�
vi :D W
:D V
V Z
w o l
LL-
C- m
I
N
COURTICE
KEY MAP 40M-1 763
615
ATTACHMENT #2
: THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW NUMBER 99-
being a By-law to authorize the Release of an Agreement with
Fridel Limited and the Corporation of the former Town of
Newcastle, now the Municipality of Clarington, for the
development of Plan of Subdivision 40M-1763.
The Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the
Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, and seal with the Corporation's seal, an
Agreement between Fridel Limited and the said Corporation.
2. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to accept, on behalf of the
Municipality, the said conveyances of lands required pursuant to the aforesaid
Agreement.
i
BY-LAW read a first time this day of 1999.
I
BY-LAW read a second time this day of 1999.
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 1999.
i
MAYOR
CLERK
616
RELEASE
ATTACHMENT
THIS INDENTURE made (in triplicate) this day of 1999.
BETWEEN:
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
hereinafter called the "Corporation"
OF THE FIRST PART
-and-
FRIDEL LIMITED
hereinafter called the "Owner"
OF THE'SECOND PART
f WHEREAS the Owner entered into a Subdivision Agreement with the Corporation
registered in the Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Newcastle (No. 10) on the
2151 day of April 1994, as Instrument No. LID 675886 which Subdivision Agreement affects
the lands more particularly described in Schedule "A"attached hereto;
AND WHEREAS the Owner has satisfied all the terms and conditions contained in the said
Subdivision Agreement with respect to the property described in Schedule "A";
AND WHEREAS the Corporation has agreement to release the Owner from the above
referred to Subdivision Agreement as same affects the lands described in Schedule "A"
attached hereto;
NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the sum of TWO ($2.00) dollars now paid by the
Owner to the Corporation, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged the Corporation
does hereby release and forever discharge the Owner, their successors and assigns, all of
the property described in Schedule "A" attached hereto from the burden of the
hereinbefore recited Subdivision Agreement as set out in Instrument No. LT 675886, with
the exemption of the Owner's responsibility for drainage as provided therein and the
Owner's acceptance of the conditions for applying for building permits as provided therein.
I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Corporation has hereunto affixed its corporate seal duly
attested to by the signatures of its proper officers duly authorized in that behalf.
THE CORPORATION OF THE
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
MAYOR
CLERK
617
DESCRIPTION
SCHEDULE "A"
ALL AND SINGULAR that certain parcel or tract of land and premises situate, lying and
being in the Municipality of Clarington, in the Regional Municipality of Durham and
Province of Ontario, and being composed of Parcels
Plan 40M-1763.
I
r
i
618
DN: PD-26-99
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date: Monday, March 22, 1999 Res. #
Report #: PD-26 -99 File #: 18T-86069 By-law #
Subject: CERTIFICATE OF RELEASE
APPLICANT: LORD ELGIN BUILDING CORPORATION
SUBDIVISION 40M-1764
FILE NO.: 18T-86069
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-26-99 be received;
2. THAT pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 5.26 of the Subdivision Agreement
between the Municipality and Lord Elgin Building Corporation, the Municipality has
no objection to the issuance of the "Certificate of Release";
3. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized by by-law to execute, on behalf of the
Municipality of Clarington, the "Certificate of Release"; and
4. THAT Lord Elgin Building Corp. be advised of Council's decision.
i
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 The Municipality entered into a Subdivision Agreement, registered on title May 13,
1994 with Lord Elgin Building Corp. to develop the lands by plan of subdivision
described as Plan 40M-1764.
1.2 Paragraph 5.36 within the Agreement, entitled "Requirements for Certificate of
Release" states that the Municipality agrees to provide the Owner with a written
release from the Agreement, for the said lands, in a form suitable for registration in
the Registry for the Land Titles Office at such time that the following items have
been confirmed.
619
REPORT PD-26-99 PAGE 2
a) The Certificate of Acceptance has been issued for all of the Works;
b) A registered Ontario Land Surveyor, approved by the Municipality, has
provided the Municipality with written confirmation that at a date not earlier
than the end of the maintenance period described herein, he has found or
replaced all standard iron bars as shown on the Plan and survey monuments
at all block corners, the end of all curves, other than corner rounding, and all
points of change in direction of roads on the Plan; and,
c) The Municipal Council has, by resolution, declared that the Owner is not in
default of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
The Certificate of Release shall operate as a discharge of the land described therein
of all obligations of the Owner under this Agreement with the exception of the
Owner's responsibility for drainage as provided therein and the Owner's acceptance
of the conditions for applying for municipal building permits as provided therein.
i
1.3 The Subdivision Agreement specifies that the Owner shall reimburse the
Municipality for all reasonable legal expenses, including the preparation of any
release.
I
2. STAFF COMMENTS
2.1 The first two requirements, being the issuance of the "Certificate of Acceptance" and
the Municipality's receipt of an Ontario Land Surveyor's confirmation, have been
completed as follows:
• Council, at their February 22, 1999 meeting, endorsed Staff Report WD-07-99
and authorized the issuance of a Certificate of Acceptance. The Certificate of
Acceptance was issued by the Public Works Department on February 23, 1999.
• The Municipality has received the Ontario Land Surveyor's Certificate for the
Plan.
6 2 U
REPORT PD-26-99 PAGE 3
In addition, the Public Works Department advises that the requirements of the
Subdivision Agreement have been completed to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works.
2.2 In consideration of the above, Staff prepared the necessary Certificate of Release,
save and except the Owner's responsibility for drainage as provided within the
Agreement and the Owner's acceptance of the conditions for applying for municipal
building permits.
3. RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1 In consideration of the above, Staff would have no objections to the issuance of the
Certificate of Release for Plan 40M-1764.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
Davi J. Wme, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Acting Director of Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer
LDT*DJC*cc
March 9, 1999
Attachment No. 1 - Key Map
Attachment No. 2 - By-law
Attachment No. 3 - Release Agreement
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Lord Elgin Building Corp.
1210 Shepherd Avenue
Suite 305
North York, Ontario
M2K 1 E3
621
ATTACHMENT #1
LOT 12 LOT 11
i
j
Q
O
w
J
Z
w0
W '
Z AZA V
w mZ
J O
U
i
O
O
v OU TH ST. S
cn
E
I I IT=� S
BOWMANVILLE ,q, _1
KEY MAP
622
ATTACHMENT #2
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW NUMBER 99-
being a By-law to authorize the Release of an Agreement with
Lord Elgin Building Corp. and the Corporation of the former
Town of Newcastle, now the Municipality of Clarington, for the
development of Plan of Subdivision 40M-1764.
The Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the
Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, and seal with the Corporation's seal, an
Agreement between Lord Elgin Building Corp.and the said Corporation.
2. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to accept, on behalf of the
Municipality, the said conveyances of lands required pursuant to the aforesaid
Agreement.
BY-LAW read a first time this day of 1999.
BY-LAW read a second time this day of 1999.
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 1999.
MAYOR
CLERK
623
RELEASE
ATTACHMENT 93
THIS INDENTURE made (in triplicate) this day of 1999.
BETWEEN:
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
hereinafter called the "Corporation"
OF THE FIRST PART
-and-
LORD ELGIN BUILDING CORP.
hereinafter called the "Owner"
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS the Owner entered into a Subdivision Agreement with the Corporation
registered in the Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Newcastle (No. 10) on the
13`h day of May 1994, as Instrument No. LD 678916 which Subdivision Agreement affects
the lands more particularly described in Schedule "A" attached hereto;
AND WHEREAS the Owner has satisfied all the terms and conditions contained in the said
Subdivision Agreement with respect to the property described in Schedule "A";
AND WHEREAS the Corporation has agreement to release the Owner from the above
referred to Subdivision Agreement as same affects the lands described in Schedule "A"
attached hereto;
NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the sum of TWO ($2.00) dollars now paid by the
Owner to the Corporation, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged the Corporation
does hereby release and forever discharge the Owner, their successors and assigns, all of
the property described in Schedule "A" attached hereto from the burden of the
hereinbefore recited Subdivision Agreement as set out in Instrument No. LT 678916, with
the exemption of the Owner's responsibility for drainage as provided therein and the
Owner's acceptance of the conditions for applying for building permits as provided therein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Corporation has hereunto affixed its corporate seal duly
attested to by the signatures of its proper officers duly authorized in that behalf.
THE CORPORATION OF THE
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
MAYOR
CLERK
624
DESCRIPTION
SCHEDULE "A"
ALL AND SINGULAR that certain parcel or tract of land and premises situate, lying and
being in the Municipality of Clarington, in the Regional Municipality of Durham and
Province of Ontario, and being composed of Parcels
Plan 40M-1764.
625
DN: PD-27-99
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date: Monday, March 22, 1999 Res. #
Report #: PD-27-99 FILE #: ZBA 99-004 By-law #
Subject: APPLICATION FOR REMOVAL OF HOLDING
GEORGE POLLITT ON BEHALF OF LESLIE AND EVELYN COLVIN
PART LOT 35, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON
FILE NO.: ZBA 99-004, (X-REF: LD 130/98)
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-27-99 be received;
2. THAT rezoning application ZBA 99-004 submitted by George Pollitt on behalf of
Leslie and Evelyn Colvin requesting the removal of the "Holding (H)" symbol from
the subject lands be APPROVED;
3. THAT the amending By-law attached hereto be forwarded to Council for approval;
4. THAT a copy of this report and the amending By-law be forwarded to the Region of
Durham Planning Department; and
5. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of
Council's decision.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 Applicant: Leslie and Evelyn Colvin
1.2 Agent: George Pollitt
1.3 Rezoning: Removal of "Holding (H)" symbol
1.4 Consent: Create one residential lot for a single detached dwelling unit
62b
REPORT NO.: PD-27-99 PAGE 2
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 On February 9, 1999, an application was received by the Municipality of Clarington
Planning and Development Department requesting removal of the "Holding (H)"
symbol from the lands associated with consent application LD 130/98. The subject
property is located in Courtice, Part Lot 35, Concession 2, former Township of
Darlington, and has frontage onto Foxhunt Trail.
2.2 The Land Division Committee heard the application at its regular meeting on May
25, 1998, at which time it was approved subject to conditions.
2.3 The property from which this lot is to be severed is 3020 square metres in area and
has frontage onto both Darlington Road and Foxhunt Trail. One lot will be created
at such time as all Land Division conditions have been fulfilled. The retained land,
which contains an existing house, will retain its 28.8 metres of frontage on
i
Darlington Road, and will have a total lot area of 2349 square metres. The
proposed single detached lot will have 15.24 metres of frontage and will have a j
total lot area of 671 square metres. Both lots would comply with the By-law
regulations for single detached lots within the R1 zone.
3. COMMENTS
3.1 The entire property is currently zoned "Urban Residential Type One (R1)". The
provisions of the By-law allow for the removal of the "Holding (H)" symbol by By-
law, upon Council being satisfied that the uses to be permitted will be adequately
serviced, have appropriate access, and will be used for purposes intended by the
By-law.
3.2 The removal of "Holding (H)" is a condition of the approval of the consent
application. The applicant is in the process of fulfilling all other conditions related
to the application.
627
REPORT NO.: PD-27-99 PAGE 3
The Region of Durham Planning Department and Works Department have also
supported the proposed severance.
4. RECOMMENDATION
4.1 In consideration of the comments noted above, Staff would have no objection to the
removal of the "Holding (H)" symbol as shown on the attached By-law and
Schedule.
i
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
David Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. (;3rankrn Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Acting Director of Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer.
IL
LT DC df
9 March 1999
Attachment #1 — Key Map
Attachment #2 — Proposed Zoning By-law
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Leslie and Evelyn Colvin
2079 Hancock Road
COURTICE, Ontario
L1E 1M3
George Pol I itt
218 Centre Street North
Box 2307
OSHAWA, Ontario
L1 H 7V5
ATTACHMENT NO.11
SUBJECT SITE
LOT 35 LOT 34
HI HwA
2
O LA
LL
M
V) 0
LAJ 40
0 li z
0
Ag
Ld
z 00
-M7
- W
z
Z �
0 ,
I ECRCUGH
COURTICE
KEY MAP ZBA. 99-004
629
ATTACHMENT NO.
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW NO.99-
being a By-law to amend by-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law of the
Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle
WHEREAS, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it
advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the former Town of
Newcastle for ZBA 99-004;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the
Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows:
1. Schedule "4" to By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing
the zone designation from "Holding — Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to
"Urban Residential Type One (R1)", as illustrated on the attached Schedule "A"
hereto.
2. Schedule "A"attached hereto shall form part of this By-law.
3. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the
provisions of Sections 34 and 36 of the Planning Act.
i
BY-LAW read a first time this day of 1999.
i
BY-LAW read a second time this day of 1999.
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 1999.
MAYOR
CLERK
630
This is Schedule"A" to By-law 99- ,
passed this day of , 1999 A.D.
LOT 35 , CONCESSION 2
S'W* Angie of
Lot 67,RCP 713
N71'53'00"E 44.03
N.W. Angle of 0
Lot 1,Plon 674 O
O Lo
co PART 1, OR 18345
Z z
N71'53 00 E 44.03
i
® ZONING CHANGE FROM "(H)R1 " TO " R1 "
0 10 20m
10m 5 0
Mayor Clerk
i
i
® SUBJECT SITE
LOT 35 LOT 34
HI HWA 2
(�T
0
13
0
Z
0
z W
IZ 4
0 N
ME UGH 0
COURTICE -
631
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Monday, March 22, 1999
Date: Res. #
CD-12-99
Report #: By-law #
ANIMAL SERVICES MONTHLY REPORT
Subject: FOR MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1999
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report CD-12-99 be received for information; and
2. THAT a copy of Report CD-12-99 be forwarded to the Animal Alliance of Canada and
the Animal Advisory Committee.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 ` For the information of Council, the table attached to this Report summarizes the
activities and revenues pertaining to Animal Services for the month of
February, 1999.
Respectfully su mitted, Reviewed by,
Patti L. arrie M.C.T. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
—_Mai ai lerk Chief Administrative Officer
MPKS*PLB*hj
Animal Alliance of Canada Animal Advisory Committee
221 Broadview Avenue
Suite 101
Toronto, Ontario
M4M 2G3
701
CLERK'S DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT N
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES DIVISION TO REPORT NO. CD.
ANIMAL CONTROL MONTHLY REPORT
FEBRUARY 1999
A.ACTIVITIES THIS MONTH YR.TO DATE'99 YR. TO DATE '98
PICKED UP -WILDLIFE 5 10 6
DOGS CATS DOGS CATS DOGS CATS
PICKED UP 21 16 29 18 35 14
BROUGHT IN 12 17 24 26 17 30
RETRIEVED BY OWNERS 18 3 28 3 24 5
SOLD TO RESIDENTS 13 17 22 26 24 26
SOLD TO RESEARCH 0 0 0 0 0 0
EUTHANISED 0 3 0 4 1 1
DEAD ON ARRIVAL 2 10 3 11 3 12
QUARANTINE 0 0 0 0 0 2
WRITTEN WARNINGS 19 31 50
P.O.A. TICKETS 1 1 13
CONVICTIONS 0 4 1
CALL-OUTS AFTER HOURS 3 7 9
OVER TIME HOURS 9 21 27
B. REVENUES
DOGS & CATS RELEASED 109.14 0 181.90 36.38 109.14 25.f
LICENSES 1873.00 0 3312.00 0 7713.75 0
SOLD TO RESEARCH 0 0 0 0 0 i
SOLD TO RESIDENTS 647.50 574.40 1295.00 753.90 647.50 320.30
REDEEMED 623.00 0 843.50 0 926.25
SUB TOTAL 3252.64 574.40 5632.40 790.28 9396.64 345.98
TRAP REVENUE 10.68 13.35 42.72
TOTAL REVENUE 3846.72 6436.03 9785.34
* NOTE: EUTHANISED 2 SICK CATS
1 FERAL CAT
702
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File#
Dater Monday,March 22. 1999 Res. #
Report# CD-13-99 By-law#
Subject: PARKING ENFORCEMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1999
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the
following:
1. THAT Report CD-13-99 be received for information; and
2. THAT a copy of Report CD-13-99 be forwarded to the Bowmanville Business Centre for their information.
REPORT;
The following pertinent statistical information relates to Parking Enforcement activities for the month of February, 1999 and
is provided herein for the information of Committee and Council.
TICKETS THIS YEAR TO YEAR TO YEAR TO
ISSUED MONTH DATE 1999 DATE 1998 DATE 1997
By Parking Enforcement 200 342 615 836
Officers
By Police 13 38 14 32
By Public Works 0 102 75 235
By Security Officers 12 36 11 nla
REVENUE
From Parking Meters $ 5,656.53 $8,704.37 $ 13,135.66 $11,078.28
From Parking Permits 0 100.00 $ 450.00 $ 500.00
Fines $ 2,885.00 $5,231.00 $4, 43.00 $8,195.00
TOTAL REVENUE $8,541.53 $14,035.37 $ 17,828.66 $19,773.28
Respectfully submitted Reviewed by
ne M Franklin Wu M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Municipal Cl Chief Administrative Officer
703
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File
Date: MONDAY, MARCH 22, 1999 Res.#
Report#: TR-9-99 ' File#: By-Law#
Subject: CO-OPERATIVE TENDER CL99-1 TRAFFIC SIGN REQUIREMENTS
Recommendations:
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report TR-9-99 be received;
2. THAT Scugog Signs, Nestleton, Ontario with an approximate total bid amount of
$24,500.00 for Part A, for the Municipality of Clarington's requirements, being the lowest ,
responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Co-operative Tender
CL99-1, be awarded Part "A" to supply and deliver the 1999 Traffic and Street Sign
requirements to the Municipality of Clarington;
3. THAT Scugog Signs, Nestleton, Ontario with an approximate total bid amount of$7,600.00
for Part B, for the Municipality of Clarington's requirements, being the lowest responsible
bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Co-operative Tender CL99-1, be
awarded Part "B" to supply and deliver the 1999 Traffic and Street Sign Hardware
requirements to the Municipality of Clarington;
4. THAT pending satisfactory pricing and service and subject to the agreement of the co-
operative participants the contract awards for Part "A" and "B" be extended for a second
and third year; and
5. THAT the funds expended be drawn from the respective years budget allocation for Traffic
and Street Signs.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT
A co-operative tender was publicly advertised and called for the supply and delivery of various
Traffic and Street Sign requirements as required by all the participants.
Sul
REPORT NO.: TR-9-99 PAGE 2
TENDER CL99-1
The participants in this Co-operative Tender are:
The Municipality of Clarington
The City of Oshawa
The Town of Whitby
The Town of Ajax
The Town of Pickering
The Region of Durham
A bid summary marked, Schedule "A" is attached.
Of the total bid amounts indicated for Parts "A" and "B" the Municipality of Clarington's
requirements amount to $24,500.00 and $7,600.00 respectively.
Note, the Municipality of Clarington does not have any requirements for parts "C" and "D".
As the total usage requirements of each of the participants fluctuates from year to year and as the
pricing is based on anticipated volume, an overall percentage increase or decrease can not be
determined. However, in spot checking individual prices any increases proposed are reasonable.
The contract resulting from this tender will cover the supply and delivery of various signs and
miscellaneous hardware to the Municipality of Clarington on an "as required" basis. Subject to
satisfactory pricing and service and upon agreement by the Co-operative participants it is
recommended that the contract be awarded for a second and third year.
With respect to the low bid submitted by Traffic Sign Depot, the maximum percentage increase
quoted for the second and third year is 10% versus 6 and 5% respectively quoted by the second
low bidder Scugog Signs. Based on the fact that the overall price difference between the first and
second bidder is just over $100.00, it is in the Municipality's best financial interest to accept the
second lowest bidder, Scugog Signs.
In addition, the low bidder does not have sufficient experience with contracts of this magnitude.
Their references provided did indicate however that satisfactory service has been provided on
small contracts.
802
REPORT NO.: TR-9-99 PAGE 3
TENDER CL99-1
In accordance with the"Terms of Reference/Constitution" of the Durham Purchasing Co-operative,
any,member agency may elect to participate in a co-operative tender call and in so doing, agree to
remain committed to the call and award, its requirements based upon the overall lowest cost/best
value, subject to the availability and approval of funds by the respective Council.
Scugog Signs were the successful bidder for this contract for the 1996 — 1998 contract and have
consistently provided satisfactory service.
After further review and analysis of the bids by both Purchasing and Public Works, it was mutually
agreed that Scugog Signs, Nestleton, Ontario, be recommended for the contract award for Parts
«A„ and "B".
The required funds will be drawn from the respective year's budget allocation for Traffic and Street
Signs.
The Treasurer has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation.
Queries with respect to department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of
Public Works.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
arie Marano,'H.BSc.,AMCT., Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Treasurer Chief Administrative Officer
t ---
Stephen Stephen . Vokes, P. Eng
Director of Public Works
MM*LB*cd
803
CL99-1, 1999 TRAFFIC SIGN REQUIREMENTS
BID SUMMARY
Schedule"A"
PART A -TRAFFIC SIGNS
BIDDER'S NAME TOTAL BID PRICE PAYMENT MAX% COMMENTS
TERMS INCREASE
Traffic Sign Depot $106,353.91 * 2% net 30 2 yr— 10% Bid on all items
Port Perry, Ontario 3rd yr— 10%
Scugog Signs $106,456.26 * 2% - 10 2 yr— 6% Bid on all items
Pontypool, Ontario 3rd yr- 5%
Summum Signs Inc. $109,532.61 * 1%-10 2 yr- 15% Bid on all items
Ottawa, Ontario net 30 days 3rd yr—N/A
Owl-Life Rentals & $110,463.48 * Net 30 2 yr—7% Bid on all items
Sales 3rd yr— 10%
Toronto, Ontario
Armtec Highway $111,401.27 * Net 30 2 yr— 10% Bid on all items
Safety Products days 3rd yr— 10%
Waterloo, Ontario
Martech Signalisation $111,720.33 Net 30 2 yr—7% Item's 118, 119, not
Inc. days 3rd yr—N/A bid
Longueuil, Quebec
Mechanical $139,592.41 * Net 30 2nu yr—5% Bid on all items
Advertising Inc. days 3rd yr-5%
Oshawa, Ontario
3M Canada Company No Bid N/A N/A No Bid
London, Ontario
* Error in calculation
GST& PST included in Total Bid Price
804
CL99-1, 1999 TRAFFIC SIGN REQUIREMENTS
BID SUMMARY
Schedule "A"
PART B - POST AND HARDWARE
BIDDER'S NAME TOTAL BID PRICE PAYMENT MAX% COMMENTS
TERMS INCREASE
Martech Signalisation $43,625.65 Net 30 2 yr—7% Item's 149, 151, &
Inc. days 3`d yr—N/A 167 not bid
Longueuil, Quebec
Scugog Signs $45,587.55 2%- 10 2 yr— 6% Bid on all items
Pontypool, Ontario 3`d yr- 5%
Owl-Life Rentals & $47,812.34 Net 30 2 yr—7% Bid on all items
Sales ' 3`d yr— 10%
Toronto, Ontario
Traffic Sign Depot $52,214.44 2% net 30 2 yr— 10% Bid on all items
Port Perry, Ontario 3`d yr— 10%
Mechanical $54,939.47 Net 30 2flu yr—5% Bid on all items
Advertising Inc. days 3rd yr-5%
Oshawa, Ontario
Armtec Highway $57,960.58 Net 30 2 yr— 10% Bid on all items
Safety Products days 3`d yr— 10%
Waterloo, Ontario
Summum Signs Inc. $63,120.63 1%-10 2 yr- 15% Bid on all items
Ottawa, Ontario net 30 days 3`d yr—N/A
3M Canada Company No Bid N/A N/A No bid
London, Ontario
"Error in caluclation
GST& PST included in Total Bid Price
805
CL99-1, 1999 TRAFFIC SIGN REQUIREMENTS
BID SUMMARY
Schedule"A"
PART C - SIGN BLANKS
BIDDER'S NAME TOTAL BID PRICE PAYMENT MAX% COMMENTS
TERMS INCREASE
Scugog Signs $13,689.89 * 2% - 10 2 yr— 6% Bid on all items
Pontypool, Ontario 3rd yr- 5%
Martech Signalisation $14,055.30 Net 30 2 yr-7% Item's 118, 119,
Inc. days 3rd yr—N/A 149, 151, & 167 not
Longueuil, Quebec bid
Traffic Sign Depot $14,344.91 2% net 30 2 yr- 10% Bid on all items
Port Perry, Ontario 3rd yr— 10%
Summum Signs Inc. $16,073.03 1%-10 fu--yr— 15% Bid on all items
Ottawa, Ontario net 30 days 3rd yr—N/A
Armtec Highway $16,483.87 Net 30 2 yr— 10% Bid on all items
Safety Products days 3rd yr— 10%
Waterloo, Ontario
Owl-Life Rentals & $16,630.09 Net 30 2 yr—7% Bid on all items
Sales 3rd yr— 10%
Toronto, Ontario
Mechanical $20,789.36 * Net 30 2 yr—5% Bid on all items
Advertising Inc. days 3rd yr—5%
Oshawa, Ontario
3M Canada Company No bid N/A N/A No bid
London, Ontario
*Error in calculation
GST& PST in Total Price Bid
806
CL99-1, 1999 TRAFFIC SIGN REQUIREMENTS
BID SUMMARY
Schedule"A"
PART D - SIGNING MATERIAL
BIDDER'S NAME TOTAL BID PRICE PAYMENT MAX% COMMENTS
TERMS INCREASE
3M Canada Company $31,692.79 * Net 30 2 yr-5% Bid only on Part D
London, Ontario days 3`d yr-5%
Armtec Highway $34,792.79 Net 30 2 yr—10% Bid on all items
Safety Products days 3`d yr—10%
Waterloo, Ontario
Scugog Signs $36,234.89 * 2%- 10 2 yr— 6% Bid on all items
Pontypool, Ontario 3`d yr- 5%
Summum Signs Inca $36,585.10 ' 1%-10 2 yr- 15% Bid on all items
Ottawa, Ontario net 30 days 3`d yr—N/A
Martech Signalisation $36,798.85 Net 30 2 yr—7% Item's 118, 119,
Inc. days 3`d yr—N/A 149, 151, & 167 not
Longueuil, Quebec ' bid
Mechanical $37,002.40 * Net 30 2 yr—5% Bid on all items
Advertising Inc. days 3`d yr—5%
Oshawa, Ontario
Traffic Sign Depot $38,250.20 2% net 30 Vu yr— 10% Bid on all items
Port Perry, Ontario 3 r yr—10%
Owl-Life Rentals& ' $50,748.52 Net 30 2 yr—7% Bid on all items
Sales 3`d yr=10%
Toronto, Ontario
*Error in calculation
GST&PST included in Total Bid Price
807
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File#
Dater MARCH 22, 1999 Res.#
Report#: TR-10-99 File#: By-Law#
Subject: QUOTATION Q98-12, BALCONY REPLACEMENT, BOWMANVILLE MUSEUM
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report TR-10-99 be received;
2. THAT Rick Potter Services, Cobourg, Ontario, with a bid in the amount of $23,433.00,
being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of
Quotation Q98-12, Balcony Replacement, Bowmanville Museum;
3. THAT funds required, in the amount of$18,500.00 be provided from the funds carried over
from the 1998 Capital Budget, Account#7029-00000-0501; and
4. THAT the additional funding, in the amount of$7,500.00 ($4,933.00 balance of tender plus
consulting costs) be provided from the Building Improvement and Reserve Account#2900-
00025-0000.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT
A quotation was issued for the Balcony Replacement at the Bowmanville Museum, with bids being
received and tabulated as follows. As the initial estimate for this project was under $20,000.00, a
formal quotation rather than a tender was issued.
BIDDER TOTAL BID
Rick Potter Services $23,433.00
Cobourg, Ontario
Kraco Carpentry Service Ltd., $40,125.00
Bowmanville, Ontario
**includes Taxes
808
REPORT NO.: TR-10-99 PAGE 2
Quotation Q98-12, Balcony Replacement, Bowmanville Museum
Funding in the amount of $18,500.00 will be provided from the funds carried over from the 1998
Capital Budget, Account #7029-00000-0501, as reflected on Page 15 of the Capital Budget. It is
recommended that the additional funds required in an approximate amount of $7,500.00
($4,933.00 balance of tender plus consulting), be provided from the Building Improvement and
Reserve Accounts#2900-00025-0000.
The Treasurer has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation.
Queries with respect to the department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the
Property Manager.
The subject firm has not previously performed for the Municipality of Clarington, however, they
have provided satisfactory service for the Bowmanville Museum.
After further review and analysis of the tender by the Property Manager and Purchasing, it was
mutually agreed that Rick Potter Services, Cobourg, Ontario, be recommended for the contract for
the Balcony Replacement at the Bowmanville Museum.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
Wiiiie Marano, H.BSc.,AMCT., Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Treasurer Chief Administrative Officer
Fred orva MR, RRFA
Property Manager
MM*LAB*cd
809
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
March 22, 1999
TR-11-99
PUBLIC SECTOR SALARY DISCLOSURE ACT
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report TR-11-99 be received for information.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT:
1.0 On January 29, 1996, the Ontario Legislature passed the Public Sector
Salary Disclosure Act. This Act requires the Municipality to disclose
annually the names, positions, salaries and taxable benefits of employees
paid $100,000 or more a year.
1.1 No employees in 1998 made over $100,000.00 within the Municipality of
Clarington.
1.2 The Municipality is required to submit this information to the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing and to include the information in the
Municipality's annual financial statements.
1.3 The Ministry of Finance will prepare, for public release on April 1 St, a
compendium of records of all employees in the Province whose salaries
are disclosed.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
r' c.,4.
arie A. Marano, H.BSc., A.M.C.T., Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Treasurer Chief Administrative Officer
MM/km
810
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File#
Date: MONDAY, MARCH 22, 1999 Res.#
Report#: TR-1 -G9 File#: By-Law#
Subject: COMMUNITY SERVICES RECREATION SOFTWARE
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report TR-12-99 be received;
2. THAT Escom Software Services Ltd., Burnaby, British Columbia, be awarded the
contract for the supply and installation of recreation software, in the amount of
$52,556.26 ($49,118.00 plus G.S.T.), as required by the Community Services
Department;
3. THAT funds in the amount of$30,000.00 be provided for from account number 7009-
00000-0502 as carried over from the 1998 Computer Services Capital budget;
4. THAT the funds required to provide for training and hardware of $27,051.26 be drawn
from Working Funds Reserve account number 2900-00001-0000;
5. THAT the annual maintenance fee in the approximate amount of$6,805.00, plus G.S.T.
and approximately $7,000.00 for additional hardware requirements be provided for in
the 1999 Computer Services budget;
6. THAT the contract with Bell Canada (Teletech Leasing) for the replacement of the
existing telephone system be increased by approximately $4,300.00 in order to
accommodate touch tone registration; and
7. THAT the attached agreement (authorized by By-law#94-149 approved November 23,
1998) be executed.
811
TR-12-99 PAGE 2
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT:
Report TR-84-98 (copy attached) waived Purchasing By-law#94-129 with respect to tendering
and authorized staff to enter into negotiations with Escom Software Services Ltd., for the supply
and installation of recreation software as required by the Community Services Department.
Report TR-4-98 authorized proceeding with the acquisition of recreation software through
Escom Services. The cost for the software was estimated at approximately $30,000.00.
Authorization was received from Council to proceed and should costs exceed the estimate, a
subsequent report would be prepared for Council review and approval.
Since that time, the requirements have been re-evaluated, with the number of stations, users,
and training days being finalized. As well, in response to market demand, touchtone
registration set-up for ultimate users has been added to the proposal. The touchtone software
is included in the 1999 Software Capital Budget. The total cost of the system, which includes
software, hardware and training is $49,118.00, plus G.S.T.
In order to accommodate the touch tone registration, an additional component will need to be
added to our telephone system. The approximate cost of this addition is $4,300.00. It is
therefore recommended that the recently awarded contract to Bell Canada (Teletech Leasing)
be amended to include the requirements for touch tone registration. Note, by adding this
feature at the same time as the telephone replacement, labour charges are kept to a minimum.
Funding in the amount of $30,000.00 will be provided from account number 7009-00000-0502,
as carried over from the 1998 Computer Services budget. Additional funding in the amount of
$27,051.26 will be drawn from account number 2900-00001-0000. It is also recommended that
the maintenance costs and additional hardware costs be provided for in the 1999 Computer
Services budget.
812
TR-12-99 PAGE 3
The Treasurer has reviewed the funding requirements and concurs with the recommendation.
Queries with respect to the department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the
Director of Community Services.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
Marie Marano, H.BSc.,AMCT., Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Treasurer Chief Administrative Officer
Jbse P. Caruana,
7� 1c or of Community Services
MM*LB"Im
813
ATTACHMENT #1
Software Services Ltd.
Class I'mPURCHASE
This document outlines the Municipality of Clarington's agreement to purchase the software and services(outlined
below)from Escom Software Services Ltd.(Escom)pursuant to the following conditions:
1) Items outlined below will be provided at a cost of$49,118, subject to the terms listed below(a-g):
Module Concurrent Users Cost
i. Class Program Registration Module 6 $8,970
ii. Class Facility Booking Module 4 $5,980
iii. Class POS Module
iv. Class Membership Services Module
v. Class Batch Credit Card Authorization Module Server License
vi. Class Information Management Module Server License N/A $3,495
vii. Class External Interfaces Module Server License
viii.Class IVR Registration server and registration licenses 4 $9,475
ix. Less applicable quantity purchase discounts ($2,792)
x. Oracle database and fourteen(14)licenses $3,360
xi. Class IVR peripheral hardware $1,880
xii. Implementation,setup and training—fifteen(15)days $18,750
Expenses included for three(3)trips
Total Cost $49,118
a) All prices are in funds of the country of installation with all duties included.
b) Sales Tax(es)are not included unless specifically identified as line items.
c) Freight is F.O.B.your offices.
d) Installation of the equipment is included, if purchased in conjunction with the software. Hardware sourced
elsewhere is subject to an installation fee. This charge will vary depending on hardware platform and
location.
e) A signed purchase order and deposit are required prior to commencement of implementation.
f) Site preparation is not included. This includes,amongst other things, installation of equipment such as PC
hardware,modems,peripheral cabling and power conditioning.
g) These prices are valid for ninety(90)days.
Page 1 of 15 814
2) The Customer will provide the following hardware and software for the operation of the Class software:
a) Desktop Workstation
Minimum Performance Suggested Performance
IBM Compatible PC IBM Compatible PC
75mhz Pentium Processor 100+MHz Pentium Processor
500mb Hard Drive 64mb RAM or more
Running Windows 95,98:32mb RAM 1.0 GB Hard Drive
Running Windows NT:64mb RAM Running Windows 95,98 or NT
b) Database Server
s
Minimum Performance Suggested Performance
IBM Compatible PC IBM Compatible PC
166mhz Pentium Processor Pentium Pro Processor SMP
128mb RAM 256mb RAM
2.Ogb Hard Drive 4.Ogb Hard Drive
Dedicated to Class Dedicated to Class
c) Network infrastructure as required to facilitate connectivity of Class clients to database server.
3) The annual maintenance for Basic Support and Lifeline Support will be$6,805 effective 90 days from date of
installation(i.e. first time consultant is on site to install,set up,or configure the Class system,or Customer
installs Class system). The initial amount due will be prorated from installation date to the preferred
maintenance anniversary date,when a one-year renewal will be due and payable subject to the terms of the
annual maintenance agreement.
4) Accreditation discounts(maximum 20%of annual maintenance cost)are applicable providing criteria specified
in Class Software Maintenance and Support Terms are met prior to live use of the system in a production
environment. If criteria are not met by date of live use of the system,the Customer will be billed retroactively
for the discounted maintenance fees and these fees will be payable immediately.
5) Consulting services will be billable to the Customer. For every five days* of consulting services, one day will
be spent off-site performing some or all of the following services:
• Preparation for consulting on-site**
• Project Management
• Development of customized reports
• Travelling to the Customer site(this will account for a portion but not all of the travel time)
* A "day" is considered to be approximately 8 hours of services provided by an Escom consultant.
** "On-site"means at the Customer's site.
Note that a portion of the fifth day of consulting may be absorbed in overtime during the four days that the
Escom consultant is on-site,should unanticipated technical difficulties or training issues arise.
6) In situations where expenses are not already included in the travel rate,the amount billable to the Customer is
based on the following guidelines in Escom's travel and expenses policies:
Page 2 of 15 815
• Per diems: Escom Consultants are credited$40.00 per day for miscellaneous expenses including
meals and local transportation(excluding car rental).
• Car rentals: Escom Consultants rent compact cars unless extenuating circumstances necessitate a
larger or more powerful vehicle. The rates for such vehicles generally range from$30.00 to$60.00
per day.
• Lodging: Escom Consultants stay in accommodation that facilitates their ability to conduct business
away from home. Required facilities include laundry, [dry cleaning],dining, and in-room modem
connections. Escom secures lodging at corporate rates for its consultants. These rates generally range
from$75.00 to$125.00 per day.
7) Billing Rates for Consulting
Consulting rates are valid for a period of six(6)months from the date the agreement is signed. Any days
specified in the agreement that are used after the initial six months has expired,will be billed at the new
prevailing rate.Current consulting rates will apply after the initial six(6)month period if extended time is as a
result of any delay caused by the vendor.
8) The payment schedule for this project shall be as follows:
a) $15,184 is payable upon signing of this agreement
b) $15,184 is payable upon delivery of the software and documentation
c) $18,750 is payable for Consulting Services(inclusive of expenses)will be invoiced as it is delivered.
9) This purchase is subject to the attached:
a) Class Pricing/Estimate Form
b) Class Software License
c) Class Software Maintenance and Support Terms
10) Customer reserves the right to purchase additional licenses and/or modules of the Class system at then
prevailing list prices less any discounts that may be available to the Customer at such time. Licenses for such
purchases made under this agreement will be incorporated through Addenda to this Agreement when signed by
authorized persons for the Vendor and Customer.
11) In order to preserve and protect its rights under applicable laws,Escom does not sell any rights in Escom
Software Services Ltd. Rather, Escom grants the right to use Escom Software by means of a Software License.
Escom specifically retains title to and copyright in all Escom computer software.
12)This legal document is an agreement between you,the end users,and Escom Software Services Ltd.
(hereinafter called"Escom"). By signing the Class Purchase Agreement,you acknowledge you have read,
understand,and are agreeing to become bound by the terms of this Agreement and attachments.
AGREED TO BY:
Escom Software Services Ltd. Municipality of Clarington
(Authorized Signatory) (Authorized Signatory)
(Date) (Date)
Page 3 of 15 816
Software by means of a Software License. Escom specifically retains title to and copyright in
all Escom computer software.
12)This legal document is an agreement between you,the end users, and Escom Software
Services Ltd.(hereinafter called"Escom"). By signing the Class Purchase Agreement,you
acknowledge,you have read, understand, and are agreeing to become bound by the
terms of this Agreement and attachments.
AGREED TO BY:
Escom Software Services Ltd. Municipality of Clarington
(Authorized Signatory) (Authorized Signatory)
(Date) (Date)
817
Escom Software Services Ltd.
13SSTM Pricing/Estimate Form Consultant: Prepare'' 3laan
Plaform: Oracle
Agency: Clarington,Municipality of Contact: Lou Ann Birkett
Address: 40 Temperance Street City: Bowmanvilie Prov/State: ON
PostallZip: L1C 3A6 Phone Number. 905-623-3379
The number of stations that will access the system at a given time during peak periods? 14
Client ServeriMultiple Site Volume Discounts are applicable
I)10 to 19 users=10% 11)20 to 34 users=16% 111)35 to 49 users=20% iv)60+users=26%
Class Modules Services(Days) Per Nos.of Total Maint
Min. Rec. Station Stations Amount Fee
Core Modules
✓
JProgrann Registration 3 4 $1,495 6 8,970 2,243
✓ Facility Booking 3 4 $1,495 4 5,980 1,495
Membership &Pass Management 2 3 $1,495
Sport Scheduling 1 2 $1,495
Add-on Modules
Daycare/Daycamps 1 2 $1,495 De
Express Reservation 1 2 $995 De
Randomized/lottery Registration(server license) 1 2 $4,495
Cash,Payments&Remittance Processing
Cash&Inventory 2 3 $1,495
On-line Payment Authorization(Cash/POS) 1 1 $495
Batch Credit Card Authorization(server license) 1 2 $4,495
City Hall/Remittance Processing(per server interface) 5 10 $4,495 De
eConnect(Public Access)
Internet Program Query(server license) 1 2 $15,000
Internet Program Registration(server license) 2 3 $10,000 De
Internet Facility Inventory Query(server license) 1 2 $15,000
Internet Facility Availability&Reservation(server license) 2 3 $10,000 CB
✓ IVR-Registration&Voice Info(server&PR licenses) 3 4 $3,495 4 9,475 2,369
Fax-back Registration-OCR(server+PR licenses) 3 5 $3,495 Ds
IVR-Tax Certificate Processing(4 line server licenses) 3 5 $9,495 De
Data Reporting&Interfaces
✓ Information Management(server license) 2 3 $3,495 1 3,495 699
External Interfaces-G/L,A/P,DTP(server license) 3 4 $2,495
Electronic Fund Transfers-EFT,PAP(server license) 3 5 $2,495 1 De
Sub-Total $27,920 $6,805
Less Applicable Discounts 10% ($2,792)
Total Cost(a) $25,128 $6,805
Other 3rd Party Software,Services&Hardware Costs:
Oracle Database(WInNT) 14 Users $3,360
Implementation Services(on-site or off-site) 11 Days $13,750 3 Ma
Additional Consulting Services(on-site or off-site) 4 Days $5,000
IVR D141H 4 Port Dialogic Card $1,350
Teleprompter =b $23,990
Other Costs
Grand Total(a+b) $49,118
Please Note:
1 Sales taxes,where applicable,are not included and prices are in the currency of the country of installation(subject to change without notice).
2 Hardware,operating system,3rd party software and site preparation are not Included unless otherwise noted.
3 Annual software maintenance is 25%of prevailing list(min.$1800yr). Server-based modules are 20%.
4 Maintenance Accreditation and Internet Discounts,as wall as Extended Support options are available and outlined in the SAN Maint.and Support Agreement
5 Consulting fees are$1,250/day for on or off-site services and inclusive of travel expenses(min.4 day trips apply).
6 One of each 5 consulting days will be allocated for projected management,Instructor preparanion,overtime and travel(on a billable basis)
7 Customer requires a modem(USR 28,800 V.34bls or better),comm software and dedicated phone line for support.
8 IVR-Registration and Faxback include a Program Registration license for each Incoming phone line(minimum 4 licenses).
9 Credit card authorization,IVR and fax-back modules camas a minimum license of 4 users.
10 A dedicated database server,as well as a Wndows NT(4.0+)server is highly recommended for each of the IVR and Internet(plus MS IIS)modules.
11 Class ships on CD ROM.Diskettes are available for$100 plus shipping.Customer may cut their own diskettes from the CD at no charge.
12 A full set of manuals are provided on the CD provided with each system.
13 DB-signifies Diamondback(Q2 1999):CB-signifies Cobra(01 2000)
818
Class' Software License
I. GRANT OF LICENSE. Escom Software Services Ltd. (Escom)as"Licensor",grants to you,the"Licensee", a non-exclusive right
to use a copy(ies)of the C/assSottware("the Software's on a single computer server to process your own data,provided the
Software is in use on only the licensed computer at any time. The Software is"in use"on a computer when it is loaded into
the temporary memory(i.e. RAM),installed into the permanent memory(e.g. hard disk or any other storage device)of that
computer or servicing requests from an asynchronous terminal device.
2. OWNERSHIP OF SOFTWARE AND COPYRIGHT. As the Licensee,you own the magnetic or other physical media on which
the Software is originally or subsequently recorded or fixed,but an express condition of this License is that Escom retains title
and ownership including copyright of the Software recorded on the original disk copy(ies)and all subsequent copies,
regardless in any form or media in or on which the original and other copies may exist. Unauthorized copying of the Software
is expressly forbidden. You may not make copies of the product manual(s)or written materials accompanying the Software
without permission from Escom.You may make as many copies of the Software as you like provided these copies are used
solely for backup or archival purposes.
3. OTHER CONDITIONS. You may transfer your rights under this License on a permanent basis provided you transfer all copies
of the Software and all written materials,and the recipient agrees to the terms of this License. Any transfer must include the
most recent update and all prior versions. You may not reverse engineer,decompile or disassemble the Software.
4. LIMITED WARRANTY. Escom warrants that,for a period of ninety(90)days from date of installation("warranty period"),the
media on which the Software is furnished will be free from any physical defects in materials and workmanship and the
Software,during the warranty period,will substantially conform to the functional description of the Software as contained in the
user's manual accompanying the Software when delivered. Escom does not warrant that the Software will run uninterrupted or
be error free.
5. Escom's entire liability and your exclusive remedy as to the Software shall be,at Escom's option,either(a)return of the
purchase price or replacement of the software,or disk,which does not meet Escom's Limited Warranty and which is
returned to Escom postage prepaid with a copy of the receipt. If failure of the disk has resulted from accident,abuse, or
misapplication,Escom shall have no responsibility to replace the Software or refund the purchase price.
6. THE ABOVE IS THE ONLY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE THAT IS MADE BY ESCOM ON THIS ESCOM PRODUCT.
7. This Warranty gives you specific rights. You may have other rights which vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and certain
limitations contained in this Limited Warranty may not apply to you. In the event of any conflict between any provision in this
Limited Warranty and any applicable legislation,the applicable legislation takes precedence over the contravening provision.
8. Escom covenants and represents that the Licensed Programs and all related materials supplied to the Customer hereunder do
not infringe or otherwise constitute wrongful use of any copyright,patent, registered industrial design,trade mark,trade secret
or any other right of any third party. Escom shall indemnify and save harmless the Customer from any suit or proceeding
(including without limitation any judgment awarded thereunder,any reasonable settlement agreed to,any costs incurred in
complying with such judgment or settlement and any or all costs,including reasonable legal costs on a solicitor and his own
client basis incurred in respect of the same)brought against the Customer by reason of any such infringement or any wrongful
use save where the same has arisen through the Customer's unauthorized modifications to the Licensed Programs.
9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. No oral or written information or advice given by Escom,its dealers,distributors,agents or
employees shall create a representation or warranty or in any way increase the scope of the above warranty and you may not
rely on any such information or advice.
10. ESCOM SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT DAMAGES EXCEEDING THE REFUND OF THE PURCHASE PRICE,
NOR ANY INDIRECT,CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES INCLUDING DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF BUSINESS
PROFITS,BUSINESS INTERRUPTION,LOSS OF BUSINESS INFORMATION,AND THE LIKE ARISING OUT OF THE USE
OR INABILITY TO USE SUCH PRODUCT EVEN IF ESCOM HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGES.
11. TERM OF LICENSE. Any rights and obligations under this License which by their nature continue after the Class Purchase
Agreement ends will remain in effect. The terms of this License will also apply to anyone who receives or is assigned rights in
the License.
12. Neither Escom nor the Customer will be responsible for failing to meet obligations due to causes beyond their control.
13. You acknowledge that you have read this License, including the Limited Warranty,understand them, and agree to be bound by
their terms and conditions. You also agree that the Class Purchase Agreement,Software License and Limited Warranty,and
Class Software Maintenance and Support Terms are the complete and exclusive statement of agreement between the parties
and supersede all proposals or prior agreements oral or written, and any other communications between and relating to the
subject matter of this agreement.This agreement is governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario.
Page 6 of 15 819
CLASS SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT TERMS
1. SUPPORT SERVICES, FEES, AND RATES
1.1. Basic Support
The maintenance rate for Basic Support is 25% of prevailing software license fee list
price. Basic Support includes the following:
• unlimited toll free support between 6:00 am and 5:30 pm Pacific Standard Time
(PST) Mon - Fri
• unlimited dial-in access
• software updates and releases
• limited report customization& query support
• quarterly newsletters provided to the Customer
• access to Escom's Web site
Note:
a) .Minimum base fee of$1,800 is applicable.
b) Fees may be increased by Escom provided that any increase in maintenance and
support charges from one year to the next does not exceed ten (10) percent of the net
fees.
c) Basic Support fees will be capped at$50,000 for non site-licensed agencies. Basic
Support fees will be capped at$100,000 for site-licensed agencies.
1.2. Lifeline Support
Lifeline Support is included with Basic Support provided that the Customer site has direct
dial-in and Internet e-mail capability. Lifeline Support includes the following:
• Basic Support plus 5:00 am—6:00 am and 5:30 pm— 11:00 pm (PST) weekdays and
5:00 am— 11:00 pm (PST) Saturday and Sunday.
• System down issues only within Lifeline hours(upgrade issues are not covered).
Note:
a) Qualifying sites must be on prevailing maintenance and support fee structure.
b) Qualifying sites must have direct dial-in and Internet e-mail capability.
c) Support calls placed during Lifeline Support hours must be placed through a Lifeline
Support contact person.
Page 7of15 820
1.3. Lifeguard Support
The maintenance rate for Lifeguard Support is 30% of prevailing software license fees list
price. Lifeguard Support features the following advantage:
• Lifeguard Support is provided during the same hours as Lifeline Support, but not
limited to system down issues (upgrade issues are included in Lifeguard Support).
Note:
a) Qualifying sites must be on prevailing maintenance and support fee structure.
b) Minimum additional fee of$500 for Premium Support (over Basic Support fees).
c) Premium Support fees will be capped at$7,500 (over Basic Support fees).
d) Support calls placed by sites on Lifeguard Support during extended support hours do
not need to be placed through a Lifeline Support contact person.
1.4. Assignment of Priorities for Support Issues
New support incidents are assigned one of the following four priority levels, each with its
respective standard completion target:
Call Priority Description Standard Completion
Level Target
A-Down Fatal issues that result in the Within 24 hours.
Customer's inability to fulfill critical
business functions (i.e. those
pertaining to core functionality such
as processing registrations,
memberships, rentals) and that have
no reasonable work-around.
B -Urgent Serious issues significantly impacting Within 36 hours.
use of system but do not prevent core
functions (such as processing
registrations, memberships, rentals)
from being fulfilled.
C-Normal All other issues, except those Within 2 business days.
classified as D (Low).
D Low Issues that are not time-sensitive or None
may be undertaken as customer
service initiatives outside the scope of
the Class Maintenance Agreement.
Escom endeavors to staff the Class support desk with resources sufficient to meet or
exceed these standard completion targets for 95% of all incidents.
Page 8 of 15 8 2 1
Should there be any disagreement over the priority assigned to a particular incident, or
any other aspect of its handling, by Class support staff, Customers are encouraged to first
speak directly to the support representative dealing with the issue in order to arrive at an
acceptable solution. In cases where escalation is desired or necessary, please contact the
Customer Care Manager with any concerns you may have (phone 1-800-663-4991).
1.5.Holiday Hours for Support Desk
The Class Support Desk will be open with reduced staff for BASIC SUPPORT ONLY on
the following Canadian statutory holidays: Good Friday; Victoria Day (3`d Monday in
May); Canada Day (July 1'�; BC Day (I"Monday in August); Thanksgiving (2"d Monday
in Oct); Remembrance Day (November 11); Boxing Day (December 26). On the
following holidays observed in common in both Canada and the United States, the Class
Support Desk will be closed: New Year's Day, Christmas Day, Labor Day. On all other
American holidays not listed above, the Class Support Desk will be open for Basic,
Lifeline, and Lifeguard Support coverage.
2. DISCOUNTS
2.1. Accreditation Discount
Customers will be eligible for a 15% discount on net annual maintenance fees should all
of the following criteria be met:
• Approved dial-in access
• Database Administrator
• Network Administrator
• Class System Administrator
• Updated system (current version of Class and database)
2.1.1. Approved dial-in Access
For Class for Windows Customers, the standard means of dial-in access is Symantec's
Norton pcANYWHERE for Windows. Microsoft's RAS or Citrix's WinFrame Server is
acceptable in situations where remote control via pcANYWHERE is unavailable.
2.1.2. Internet Enabled Support
Refers to the ability of the Customer's Class System Administrator contact(s) to
communicate with Escom via the Internet for purposes of e-mail and file transfer. Also
includes Escom's ability to access the Customer's system remotely via a pcANYWHERE
connection initiated by both Escom and the Customer via the Internet. The Customer will
be required to provide access privileges through firewalls and security systems.
Page 9of15 8 - 2
2.1.3. Database Administrator
The Customer should have in-house database expertise in the database platform used by
the Class application, as demonstrated either by certification or course work, or by
equivalent experience including the ability to install, maintain, backup and restore,
troubleshoot, and optimize the database environment. It is expected that where Customer
qualifies for the Accreditation Discount, the Customer assumes full responsibility for
maintaining the database environment and the involvement of Class Support will be
infrequent. he
required from Escom as a result of a failure on the part of the
Customer to carry out these duties or to use reasonable efforts to do so, will be
billable at Escom's then prevailing.rates.
2.1.4. Certified Network Administrator
Customer should have in-house expertise in the network operating system by which client
workstations are connected to the Class database, as demonstrated either by certification
or course work, or by equivalent experience including the ability to install, maintain,
troubleshoot, and optimize the network. It is expected that where the Customer qualifies
for-the Accreditation Discount, the Customer assumes full responsibility for maintaining
the network and the involvement of Class Support will be infrequent.
2.1.5. Class System Administrator
The Customer should have a limited number of Class System Administrators who have
been trained on all Class modules licensed by the Customer, and who are available to
work with other users of the software. The Class System Administrators should be able
to handle most of the basic questions from the users at your organization. In the case of
Class for Windows Customers—the Class System Administrators should be familiar with
the version of Windows in use on desktop PCs, be familiar with the setup and installation
of Class on client workstations, and know the administrative login and password. When
it is necessary to contact the Class Support Team the Class System Administrators should
collect all the pertinent information and call the Support Team on behalf of your
organization. It is expected that where the Customer qualifies for the Accreditation
Discount, the Class System Administrators will be responsible for all
communications to the Support Team and be able to make policy decisions for the
Customer, as they would relate to Class.
2.1.6. Updated System(current version of Class and database)
In order to qualify for the Accreditation Discount, the Customer must be running the most
recent available version of Class (excluding pre-release or beta versions). Similarly, the
Customer must be running either the most recent available version of the database
supported by the Class application, or a version immediately prior to the most recent
version.
Page 10 of 15 � � �
Customers who do not qualify for the Accreditation Discount must still be on either the
most recent available version of Class, or the version immediately prior to the most
recent version. Support will not be provided for issues encountered in versions of Class
older than the version immediately prior to the most recent version.
2.2. Internet Enabled Discount
Customers will be eligible for an additional 5% discount on net annual maintenance fees
should all of the following criteria be met:
• Access to the Customer's Class system for dial-in support via the Internet
• Internet email capability
3. ADDITIONAL FEES AND CHARGES
The following table outlines additional fees and charges:
Report Customization and $350 per report request/incident; 5 Pak for $1,450
Query Support
Multiple Class database 25% of net support fees per live database
support .
Additional Fees & Charges (cont'd)
Time and materials support $250 per incident up to one hour; $125 per hour
thereafter; 40%of prevailing software list per release
Hardware support 10% of list price of all units purchased via Escom, min.
$500 per site; includes next business day replacement of
card printers, POS peripherals, scanners, etc.; coverage
will not be provided for partial inventories
Non-Class related issues Minimum$250 per incident up to one hour; $125 per
hour thereafter.
3.1. Limited Report Customization and Query Support
Class Support will provide limited assistance with report customization and the
development of custom queries where such can be provided in fifteen(15) minutes or
less. Full customization service will be billable at$350.00 per report or query provided
such customization can be done by support personnel within less than eight(8) hours.
Resultant reports and queries will be made available to all Class Customers on Escom's
web site.
3.2. Minimum Base Fee of$2500 is applicable
This minimum fee of$2,500 is exclusive of any applicable discounts, i.e. a site whose
maintenance is at the minimum can still earn discounts below$2,500.
Page 11 of 15 OLUU ))
4
3.3. Basic Support Fees Will Be Capped at$50,000
This maximum fee of$50,000 is inclusive of any applicable discounts, i.e. fees for a site
whose maintenance, less applicable discounts, is higher than$50,000 will be capped at
$50,000.'
3.4. Lifeline Support . . System down issues only
Lifeline Support is available for fatal problems only that result in the Customer's inability
to fulfill critical business functions (i.e. those pertaining to core functionality such as
processing registrations, memberships,rentals) and that have no reasonable work-around.
All other calls-including all calls related to upgrades—placed by the Customer within
Lifeline Support hours (5 —6 AM and 5:30 PM 11:00 PM Monday—Friday, and 5 AM
— 1'1 PM Saturday and Sunday)will be billable on the basis of time and materials ($250
per incident up to one hour, $125 per hour thereafter).Lifeline Support will be made
available only to sites with dial-in access and Internet email capability. Support calls
placed during Extended Support hours MUST be placed through a Lifeline Support
contact(maximum three contacts per agency).
3.5. Lifeguard Support. . . not limited to System down issues
Under Lifeguard Support, the Customer may call during Lifeline Support hours on all
issues and in all circumstances covered under Basic Support coverage, including
upgrades.
3.6. Multiple Class Database Support
Basic and Lifeguard Support rates are for a single live database. For each additional live
database a 25%of net support fees surcharge will apply. The surcharge does not apply to
trainer databases.
3.7. Time and Materials Support
Time and Materials charges ($250 per incident up to one hour, $125 per hour thereafter)
will be applicable in cases where the Customer chooses to opt out of the yearly
maintenance agreement. New releases of Class will be available in such circumstances
for 40%of prevailing software list prices.
3.8. Hardware Support
Maintenance, operation, and troubleshooting of card printers, POS peripherals, scanners,
etc., purchased through or from Escom remains the responsibility of the Customer unless
the site chooses to purchase hardware support at 10%of list price of hardware covered
(minimum$500).
3.9. Non Class related Issues Support
Support for non-Class related problems will be limited to helping to isolate the problem
source, or providing troubleshooting advice, where this can be done in fifteen minutes or
less. Where the problem cannot be solved within fifteen minutes, support will be
available on a billable basis ($250 per incident up to one hour, $125 per hour thereafter).
Page 12 of 15 825
Examples include:
• General network support - for example network access, printing, backup & restoration
• PC hardware trouble shooting
• PC setup, configuration and optimization
• Network operating system configuration and functionality
• Basic Windows functionality (e.g. using File Manager or Explorer)
• Modem configuration& setup
• Data corruption due to lack of disk space
• Loss of supervisor or other password
4.. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
4.1. The maintenance and support terms apply for one (1) calendar year from date of installation
unless specified otherwise. Software maintenance and support fees are payable in advance,
on the maintenance renewal date specified in the Class Purchase Agreement.
4.2. Escom shall provide telephone support(in English)to the Customer by way of the Escom
Class Support Desk. The goal of the telephone support is to provide answers to any
questions relating to Escom's products or services including questions regarding system
errors (excluding hardware-related or operating system-related) or use of the Licensed
Programs.
4.3. Any training requested by the Customer shall be billed separately to the Customer, unless
otherwise specified or provided for in the Agreement.
5. CUSTOMER RESPONSIBILITIES
5.1. The Customer is responsible for arranging for third party hardware (i.e. operating system
and database) maintenance agreements separately with the appropriate hardware/operating
system vendor, at the Customer's expense.
5.2. The Customer shall be responsible for ensuring that regular backups of the Customer's data
are carried out. A full backup should be done at least daily. Backups should always be
verified.
5.3. It is highly recommended that refresher courses be scheduled by the Customer when a staff
turnover of greater than fifty (50) percent occurs, or the Class System Administrator leaves
the department, as staff turnover can drastically affect system operations.
r
Page 13 of 15 826
ADDENDUM A
SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS AND ENHANCEMENT REQUESTS
Software Quality Assurance Process
Escom seeks to ensure that Class for Windows software is error free. To that end
significant ongoing investments are made in the following areas:
L Developing quality detailed specifications of all new functionality and modules,
which form the basis of all programming work.
2. Code reviews, in which programming staff mutually review one another's work in
order to ensure that it meets company quality standards and programming
conventions.
3. Extensive in-house testing of all software by a dedicated team of Quality Assurance
specialists, including automated regression testing to ensure that functionality is not
negatively affected by changes to existing code.
4. A full;cycle of beta testing in test and production environments by a small number of
participating Customer sites.
5. Submission of Class for Windows to authorized Microsoft testing authorities in order
to verify the full compatibility of the software with the most popular desktop
operating systems. ,
Corrective Action
When issues with the software are discovered or reported by a Customer, the following
steps are followed in order to correct them within a timeframe appropriate to the degree
of severity.
1. The Customer reports issue to Class Support.
2. !Class Support staff attempt to replicate the problem, provide work-around to the
Customer where available.
3. 'Support staff report issue to Product Team, a cross-functional team consisting of
members of the Development, Quality Assurance, Consulting Services, and Support
teams, chaired by the Class Product Manager.
4. Product Team meets weekly (or as required in the case of fatal issues) to determine
issue's severity and to assign it an appropriate priority for a fix. Fatal or very serious
issues are fixed in the current version in use at Customer sites through issuing an
update that is made available as soon as possible on Escom's web site. Less serious
issues are typically fixed in the version of the software currently under development
and are available after this version has completed beta and gone into general release.
Cosmetic and minor issues may be deferred to a future release in some situations.
Page 14 of 15 827
Enhancement Requests
Enhancement requests, that is, desired modifications to the software's functionality, may
be submitted to Class Support staff. In some cases it will be recommended that a more
detailed description of the desired feature be submitted in writing to the Class Product
Manager, via fax (604-432-9708). All enhancement requests are tracked during each
release cycle, then compiled for ranking by Customers. Priorities for individual
enhancement requests are assigned once per release cycle (2 release cycles are projected
per year) as a result of Customer input, in conjunction with evaluation done by the
Product Committee. Those accepted for a particular release become part of the regular
release process, including the development of detailed specifications.
Page 15 of 15 828
ATTACHMENT #2
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
File#
Date: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1998 TR-84-98
Res.#t =�
Report#: File#: By-Law#_yZ
Subject: COMMUNITY `SERVICES RECREATION SOFTWARE
'
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT report TR-84-98 be received;
2. THAT ' Purchasing By-law #94-129, Section 5, Paragraph 5.06 be
waived for this transaction.
3. THAT staff be authorized to commence negotiations with Escom
Software Services Ltd. , for the purchase of Recreation Software a.�
required by the Community Services Department.
4. THAT pending successful negotiations, staff be authorized to award
the contract for Recreation Software to Escom Software Services;
and
5. THAT the attached BY-LAW Marked Schedule "A" authorizing the Mayor
and Clerk to execute, the necessary agreement be approved.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT
Currently, , the Municipality of Clarington, has several computer and
paper-based systems in place to handle the booking, registration and
membership management needs. These labour intensive systems no longer
meet the needs of the Municipality in order to efficiently manage the
volume of registrations, facility bookings, and inquiries received
through the Community Services Department.
Capabilities in anew Recreation Software program would include; program
registration, facility booking, touch-tone registration, information
management, financial management, membership services, point of sale,
and scheduling. It is intended that these modules would be purchased as
funds are made available though the annual budget process. There is
currently approximately $35, 000.00 allocated for the purchase of
recreation software in the 1998 and previous Capital Budget.
829
?.E PORT -0. PAGE 2
Throughout the fast few months, the Recreation Department, in
conjunction with the City of Oshawa, and the Town of Whitby, have been
investigating recreaticn software options available on the market place.
Since that time the Town of Whitby has entered into a contract with
Escon Software Services for the purchase of their software program. The
City of Oshawa is still reviewing their overall organization
requirements and will be issuing a formal Request for Proposal within
the next few weeks.
It is uncertain at this point in time whether an alternative viable
solution exists on the market place. In 1997 the City of Mississauga,
issued a Request for Proposal with only two firms responding and Escon
Software Services being the successful bidder. Currently Escom Software
Services has approximately 45 Ontario Municipalities using their
Recreation Software program.
Based on the experience of the City of Mississauga, and the numerous
other Ontario Municipalities, it is recommended that the requirement for
tendering, Purchasing By-law #94-129, Section 5, Paragraph 5 .06, be
waived for this transaction, and that staff be authorized to enter into
negotiations with Escom Software Services for the purchase of the
required recreation software. It is anticipated that the initial
implementation will cost approximately $30, 000. 00. If the final
negotiated cost exceeds this amount, a report and recommendations will
be presented to Council for approval. The Community Services Department
has spent considerable time investigating the product and in
consideration of the difficulty experienced with the current system for
registration, the new product must be ordered at this point in order to
be in place for early 1999 registrations.
Respectfully submitted; Reviewed by,
rctinag Nartc y TVayl.or� rano, H.BSc. , AMCT. ,
D Treasurer hief Administrative Officer
r9 ph Caruana
1D rector of Community Services
MM*LB*jt
Attach.
830
SCHEDULE "A"
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW #98-
Being a By-law to authorize a contract between the
Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington and
Escom Software Services Ltd. for the Community
Services Recreation Software Program.
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS
FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute on
behalf of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington with
the Corporation Seal, a Contract between Escom Software Services
Ltd. and Said Corporation; and
2 THAT this agreement attached hereto as Schedule "B" form part of
this By-iaw.
By-law read a 'first and second time this day of November,
1998
By-law read a third time and finally passed this day of November,
1998.`
Mayor
Clerk
831
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File#
Date: MONDAY, MARCH 22, 1999 Res.#
Report#: TR-13-99 File#: By-Law#
Subject: EARLY TENDER CALLS
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report TR-13-99 be received; and
2. THAT staff be authorized to advertise and issue tenders in advance of the 1999 Capital
Budget approval for the requirements identified in the body of this report.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT:
The 1999 Capital Budget is tentatively scheduled for presentation to Council April 12, 1999.
Due to the ,'pending construction season and lengthy lead times, there are certain capital
requirements that require pre-budget approval to allow tendering to take place as soon as
possible.
Pre-budget approval is therefore requested for the following items:
ITEM BUDGET COMMENTS
AMOUNT
39,000 G.V.W.. Cab & Chassis $130,000.00 Extended lead time for ordering
Public Works Department
Parking Lot Samuel Wilmont Nature $30,000.00 $6,000.00 contributed from Ministry
Area—Cobbledick Road of Natural Resources— spring
Planning/Public Works Departments construction required.
1999 Surface Treatment $245,000.00 Completion of work required by mid-
Public Works Department May
832
Report TR-13-99 Page 2
ITEM BUDGET COMMENTS
AMOUNT
1999 Pulverizing $30,000.00 Completion of work required by mid-
Public Works Department May
Supply Granular Materials $325,000.00 Completion of work required by mid-
Public Works Department May
Pending Council approval for an early tender call on the above items, it is anticipated that the
tenders will be advertised in March. A subsequent report with recommendation for an award
will be presented for approval by Council.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
�hlCarie Marano, H.BSc.,AMCT., Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Treasurer Chief Administrative Officer
MM*LB*Im
833
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File#
Date: MARCH 22 1999 Res.#
Report#: File#: By-Law#
Subject:
MONTHLY FIRE REPORT - FEBRUARY, 1999
Recommendatlon :
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
THAT Report FD-6-99 be received for information.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 Our report covers the month of February, 1999. It is our intent to provide
Committee with information relevant to this department, in a'timely manner.
2. REPORT''
2.1 The department responded to 137 calls in February and recorded total fire loss
at $1,396,200.90. A breakdown of the calls responded to follows.
Continued.....
p AAA\.o PfCYC[
901
F®-6-99 - 2 -
NTH Y T YEAR
ENDING T I
T
/ 3
CLASSIFICATION / T
T
1999
1
PROPERTY FIRES
(Includes structure,chimney,vehicle,miscellaneous 15 33 11 24
e.g.furniture,clothing,etc.)
UNAUTHORIZED BURNING 5 6 1 2
(Burning complaints)
FALSE FIRE CALLS
(Includes alarm activations-accidental/malicious, 27 62 24 40
human-perceived emergencies/check calls e.g.
Investigate unknown odour)
PUBLIC HAZARD CALLS
(Includes propane/natural gas leaks,fuel/chemical 14 69 19 37
spills, power lines down/arcing,C.O. leaks,etc.)
RESCUE CALLS
(Includes vehicle extrication/accidents,
commercial/industrial accidents,home/residential 13 47 13 36
accidents,water/ice rescue)
MEDICAL ASSIST CALLS
(Includes assist to ambulance personnel with 54 122 62 110
respiratory and resuscitation emergencies)
MISCELLANEOUS CALLS
(Includes assist to other agencies,other public 9 23 5 9
service,etc.)
TOTAL CALLS 137 367 135 260
TOTAL FIRE LO $1,396,200 $1,464,700 $116,500 $172,300
NUMBER ALARMS BY STATION
T. #1 ST. #2 ST. #3 ST. #4 ST. #5 TOTAL
63 13 13 33 10 137
Continued....
902
FD-6-99 - 3 -
2. REPORT
2.1 Fire loss was high during the month of February as a result of several structure
fires in the Municipality.
2.2 On February 10, 1999 at 0325 hours we responded to a structure fire at 5541
Washington Road. An implement work shop had caught on fire and spread to
approximately 4,000 large square bales of straw. Total loss was approximately
$230,000. The loss of straw was estimated at$100,000 and tools and equipment
at $100,000. The loss of the implement shed was estimated at $30,000.
Eight fire department vehicles were dispatched to this incident. Hampered by
cool temperatures and having to shuttle water, it took 33 firefighters a total of 486
man hours to put this fire out.
2.3 The department responded to another fire at 1616 hours on February 10, 1999
at 3172 Hancock Rd., Courtice Auto Wreckers. A fire in a rear shop, behind the
house, caused by leaking gasoline from a snowmobile caused approximately
$80,000 dollars in damage. As the snowmobile was dragged from the shop,
sparks caused the gasoline to ignite. A total of five fire department vehicles, from
Stations 1 and 4, responded to this location'.
2.4 On February 22, 1999 at 0639 hours we responded to the report of a structure fire
at 1573 Townline Road. The fire originated in the area of a woodstove located in
the rear breezeway. Damage was estimated at approximately $125,000.
We dispatched three tankers and a total of seven fire department vehicles along
with nineteen firefighters to the scene. Again, having to shuttle water created a
hinderance with extinguishment.
2.5 The department responded to a major structure fire on February 24, 1999 at 0441
hours to 4272 Lakeshore Road, Newcastle. Fire broke out in a 130 year old
century, fieldstone home which had two additions. Loss was estimated at
$800,000.
Twelve fire department vehicles responded, including all four tankers. Forty-five
men were required totalling 360 man hours to put this fire out. We were
hampered by minus 12 degree temperatures, having to shuttle water from
Highway No. 2 and Morgan's Road, two railway lines crossing the driveway and
steel security bars hindering access to the house. One of our firefighters'fell into
the basement injuring his back. He is undergoing physiotherapy for his injury.
Another firefighter suffered from smoke inhalation during rescue attempts and
remained in the hospital for eight hours before he was released.
Continued....
903
FD-6-99 - 4 -
All in all it was a busy month. The need to replace our 5th tanker became evident
to help establish and maintain firefighting efforts.
3. RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1 It is respectfully recommended that report FD-6-99 be received for information.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by
Michael G. Creigh n, AMC (A), CMM11 Franklin Wu,
Fire Chief. Chief Administrative Officer
/sr
904
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File#
Date: MARCH 22, 1999 Res. #
By-Law#
Report#:__ FD-?-9- 9---- File#: -1 8:12.6
Subject:
CANATEX 3 EXERCISE - APRIL 27, 28 & 29, 1999
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council that Fire Department Report FD-7-99 be
received for information purposes.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 Canatex 3 is a Federally sponsored, national level, full scale nuclear exercise
based on a simulated accident, to take place April 27, 1999, at the Darlington
Nuclear Generating Station (DNGS). The exercise will commence on April 27th
and continue into April 28 1999.
2. REPORT
2.1 1 would like to bring Council and Staff up-to-date with regard to the Municipality's
involvement in the above-headed exercise.'
2.2 On April 27th the Municipal Operations Centre (MOC) should be fully operational
with all pertinent staff. As identified in the Municipality's Emergency Plan the
following persons should attend, The Mayor (or'alternate), Chief Administrative
Officer, Fire Chief, Director of Public Works, Director' of Community Services,
Municipal Clerk , Treasurer. Support staff should also attend and would include
duty officers/communicators from each of the departments. Also, one Councillor
may attend to keep Council informed on the emergency situation. The hours of
operation will be from 8:30 a.m. until approximately 4:30 or 5:00 p.m.
2.3 On April 28th the same players will be required to staff the MOC from 8:30 a.m.
until 12:00 p.m. A skeleton staff, to be determined that day, will remain at the
MOC from 12:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m.'
Continued......
11EEYE P.PEI
PEPlo #ECYEL£ 905
F®®7-99 - 2 -
2.4 On April 29th a debriefing will take place, from 2:00 p.m. until 3:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers at the Municipal Administration Centre, for those who took part
in the Canatex Exercise.
2.5 Following the Canatex 3 Exercise the Nuclear Emergency Plan will be put in its
final draft. Once this has been done, the plan will be developed to include peace
time emergencies for the Municipality and replace the two draft plans that were
never approved by Council.
o RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1 It is respectfully recommended this report be received for information purposes.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by
Michael G. Creight , AMCT(A), CMM11 Franklin Wu,
Fire Chief. Chief Administrative Officer
/sr
906
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date: 'Res. #
Monday, March 22, 1999
Report#: WD-14-99 File#: By-Law#
Subject: MONTHLY REPORT ON BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY
FOR FEBRUARY 1999
Recommendations:
It is respectfully ;recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report WD-14-98 be received for information.
1. BACKGROUND:
1.1 With respect to the Building Permit Activity for the month of March 1999, Staff wish
to highlight the following statistics for the information of Committee and Council.
MONTH OF FEB 1999 YEAR TO DATE 1999 YEAR TO DATE 1998
Permits Issued 35 86 106
VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION
Residential $? 2,087,765. $ 7,463,195. $ 6,677,755.
Commercial $ 200,000. $ 211,000. $ 2,492,352.
Industrial $' 0. $ 0. $ 1,085,000.
Others $ 15,030,500. $ 15,089,750. $ 138,261.
TOTAL $ 17,318,265. $ 22,763,945. $ 10,393,368.
1101
INLS
6 PN DC nECY—D PAFEn
I
REPORT NO.: WD-14-99 PAGE
1 .2 With respect to non-residential building permit activities, the details are provided as
follows:
APPLICANT CONSTRUCTION TYPE LOCATION $ VALUE
KNOX CHRISTIAN SCH 3 PORTABLES 410 SCUGOG STREET 30,00
ONTARIO HYDRO TRAINING FACILITY DARLINGTON GEN STA 151000,000
CLINIC BLDGS LTD ADDITION VARCOE RD/HWY #2 200100
TOTAL
15,230,000
1.3 Details of permit activities and historical comparisons are provided in the attached tables.
I
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
Stephen . Vokes, P.Eng. Franklin Wu
Director of Public Works Chief Administrative Officer
SV*bb
*Attach
5 March 1999
l 1 .JZ
11
11 Group 1
Feb 1999
1 1999 Y.T'.D1
1998'Y.T.D)
Feb 1999:
1 1999: Y.T.D1
1998 Y.T.D1 Feb 3999
! 1999 Y.TiD.
) 1998 Y.T.D.
II SFD 1
9
1 ! 22 J 1
17
1 10 t
1 18 1
16
1 1,163,765.00
1 4,306,960.00
I
1 2,037,265.00:
I
If I
!1 SDD 1
I I
1 12 1
44
I '
1 9
I I
1 15 1
12
I
1
1 966,990.00
1
1
1 4,009,000.00 1
I 1
II I
II SMD (
I I
I (
5
I
!
I I
( I
5
i
I
11
I '1
402,000.00'
I1 1
!i TWH 1
14
I I
1 31 1
I I
I
1 14
I
1 I
1 20 1
I I
5
I
( 870,000.00
i
1 ;2,084,445.00
I
1 }
i II
II I
IIMUL 1
1 r I
I I
I i
I
I I
I I
I
I
1
i
I II
I II
II I
II DFD
!I OTH 1
5 1
r 10 1
13
1
1 1
! 54,000.00
1 104,800.00
1 229,490.00 1'
I
11 SUB-TOTAL 1
28 1
75 1
79
1 33 i
i 53 1
38
1 2,087,765.`00
1 7,463,195.00
) 6,67.7,755-00 1'
1
11 I
11 COM 1
I
-1 1
I
2 ! 1
!
16 1
:
I I
i 1
2
I
1 200,000.00
I
( 211,000.00
I
d II
) 2,492,352.00 : II
I II
11 ' I
II IND I
I
I
I
I
I
4 I
1
I
I
(
2
I
1
I
1
I
1 1,085,000.00 it
I II
11 ! I
11 INS 1
I
1 1
I
2 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
i i
I
30,000.00
1 89,000.00
I
) 11
I II
II I
II AGR I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 I
I
I I
I II
II
11 I
it GOV I
I
I
I
I
I
3 I
1
I
I
I
I
1 1
1 )
134,761.00 I!
II HYD 1
:1 1
1 1
!
I
i
I
15,000,000.00
1 15,000,000.00 1
II
1) PLM :. 1
1 1
2 1
-2 ( :
1
1
i
500.00
1 750.00 i
3,500.00 !I
II REN 1
1 1
2 1
I
I
!
I
1 l
II
II DEM 1
_2 1
2, 1
z
I
11 SUB-TOTAL 1
7 1
11 (
27 1
(
!
7 1
15,230,500:00
( 15,300,750.00 1
3,715,613.00 11
I
I
I1 TOTAL 1
i
35 1
86 1
106 1
33 1
53 —1
45 1
17,318,265.00
1 22,763,945.00 )
10,393,368.00 11
I
AGR
Agricultural
GOV
Government
HYD
Hydro
PLM
Plumbing
REN
Renewal
DEM
Demolition
BP FEES
1 182,058 1
239,383 1
108,094 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 11
11
PP FEES I
50 1
100 1
100
i1
II
(�
Summary of Residential Units by Geographical Areas
based on Building Permits Issued. Printed on 99.03.04 at 13:53
Current Year Figures to the End of 99.02.28
II
�1
URBAN AREAS RURAL
AREAS
HAMLETS
II
YEAR
I BOWM
i COUR
NEWC I WILM I ORON DARL 1
CLAR
BURK ENFI
I ENNI
I HAMP
I HAYD I
KEND I KIRB
I LESK
MAPL
MITC
I NEWT
I SOLI
I TYRO
I TOTALil
1� 76
1 239
( 2 1
5 1 3 ( 19 1
18
1 I
1 1
I 2
1
1 I
1
1 I
3
1 I
3
I 1
1
I 1
299 I�
1I 77
1 118
1 2 (
11 1 i 7 ( 29 1
26
1 1
1
1 2
1 2 1
2 1 1
1 (
1
2 1
1
1
1 203 II
78
I 13
2
� I
2 45 19
I I I �
25
1
I i
( 1
1 1
1
I I
1 1
1
5 I
2 I
2
I
I 119 1I
II 79
I 1
2
I I
7 25
� I I I
22
I I
�
I
I i
1 1
3 1
1
1 1
1
1 i
63 I1
I1 80
3
1 2 I
47 1 I 1 ( 19 i
12
1 I
1
1 1
(
(
1
1
3
1
( 88
II
1
3 i I 2 I 28
25
I 1 I
I
I
I 1 I
I I
1 1
I
2
I
7 I
2
I 73
82
i 60
I 1
5 ( I 1 1 24
14
1 1 i
(
1
I I
1
1
1 (
2 (
5
1 114 1I
I� 83
( 10
I 2
7 I I I 32 I
IB
( 2
2
1 3
I 3
3 I
1
1 (
( 84—{I
I� 84
1 9
( 36
4 I 107 6 I 43 I
15
1 3 I
I 1
I 2
I 1
4 I
7
I 239 �I
�I 85
I 61
I 276 1
26 1 118 4 1 46 (
22
1 9 1
1 1
1 3
i 3 I
I 1
I
2
1 1
4
1 576 �I
1
86
1 125
I 579 1
105 1 173 1 2 1 82 1
33
1 18 1
1 9
1 7
( 4 I
I 1
I
2 1
3
5 I
9
11151 11
1
I
-87 1
365
i 670 1
26 I 137 1 3 ( 111 1
45
I 12 1
1 14
1 5
1 4 1
1 ( 1
1 1
1 1
1
I
5 1
2
11402 1I
11 88
347 1
633 (
317 ( 64 1 2 1 123 1
44
1 21 1
I 15
1 4
1 1 1
I 1
I
1
1
1
11 1
11582 11
89 1
181 (
697
262 I 42 1 1 1 77 1
49
1 11 1 2
I 21
1 8
1 I
1
(
1
1 1
2 I
4
1
11359 11
I
11 90 1
199
305
28 1 6 1 1 25 (
20
1 5
4
2 1
1 594 (I
I
—� 11 91
433 I
255 1
46 1 2 1 1 1 15 1
11
I 1
1 2
1
1 I
1 1 1
1
1
2 1
1 771 �)
92
O 1
532 I
204
22 10 3 14
I I
6
1
I I
1
1 1
1 1 I
1 1
I
1
I
1 1
1 1
1 797 11
93
301 1
232 (
6 10 1 3 1 9 I
6
I 1
1
( 3
1 1
I 1
1
I
1
1
1 (
( 572 ()
94 I
406 (
388
4 I 10 1 2 11 1
8
1 2 1
I 1
I
1 1
1
1
1 1
I
1
1 I
I 8� {I
II 95 1
229
170 I
1 16 1 1 1 21 I
7
1 I
I
( 1
( I
I
1
1
2 I
1
1 447 �I
I
96 1
217 (
331
3 16 17 1
10
3
1 2
2
601 �I
97 (
423 1
295 1
5 ( 21 1 20
20
2 3
1 7
( 2
( 2 1
1 1 1
1
(
1
(
1 801 II
98 (
313
254 1
4 1 33 1 1 14 I
12
1 1 I
1 3
1 1
( 1
636 I)
�� 99 (
11 (
50 I
1 1 I 3 1
I
1
I
1
I I
1 I
I
I
1
I
I
1 65 it
YEAR
{ RESIDENTIAL :)
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
5,627,000.00
AGRICULTURAL
INSTITUTIONAL
GOVERNMENT
ONT HYDRO
! TOTAL
{
11(79
4,672,000.00
5,981,000.00
4,100,000.00
412,000.00
87,000.00
' 50,000.`00 (
8,224,000.00 1
( 15,252,000.00
{I
11:80
4,618,000.00
832,000.00
2,505,000.00
1 57,581,350.00 1
'101,000.00
4,291,000.00
1
2,814,000.00
15,161,000.00
{'
81
'..� 5,341,000.00
467,000.00
( 866,000.00
91
156,000.`00
246,000.00
'.86,478,000.00
�'. 93,554;000.00
{I
11 82
6,260,000.00
718,000.00
256,000.00
73,408,800.00
127,000.00 (
1,506,000.00
67,186,310.00 !)
( 7,466,000.00
16,333;000.00 1
11583
6,561,000.00
1,274,000.00 (
246,000.00
'5,585,000.00
114,000.00
2,278,000.00
99,749;560.00
7,281,000.00
17,754,000.00
{I
'1 i84
13,450,000.00
1,262,000.00. (
1,685,000.00
733,500.00
120,000.00
445,000.00
i
7,300,000.00 �'..
24,462,000.00
1f
11 94
11 85
{ 29,859;000.00
1,299,000.00 )
786,000.00
I
100,000.00
1,719,000.00
1,330,000.00
630,000.00
35,723;000.00
'
�1 86
65,010,000.00
2,247,000.00:
3,071,000.00
551,000.00
+184,000.00
839,000.00
(
1,770,000.00
73,121,000.00
{I
�1 87
90,705;000.00
4,619,000.00' 1
4,165,000.00
4,164,405.00
231,000.00
2,063,000.00
7,995,000.00
3,095,000.00
112,873;000.00
:5,083,000.00
i
11 88
i
1.137,773,000.00
2,901,000.00`. )
i
5,627,000.00
i
i
.160,000.00 (
i
14,207,000.00 1
i
1
1,439,000.00
i -11
1 .162,107,.000.00 '
(� .89
�.148,434,000.00
3,149,000.00'. )
34,157,000.00
' 50,000.`00 (
8,224,000.00 1
:6,868,000.00
124,139,000.00
1 :.225,021,000.00
it
1
11 90
1 57,581,350.00 1
1,526,000.00
2,948,000.00
1
4,145,000.00 (
3,678,000.00
1
430,700.00
1 70,309,050.00
91
65,698,000.00
3,859,300.00:1
1,324,000.00
1
438,000.00
551,000.00 (
17,000.00
1,521,500.00
73,408,800.00
'
1
'11 92
67,186,310.00 !)
3,577,750.00' 1
186,000.00
412,000.00 1
1,389,000.00 1
'5,585,000.00
x,21,413,500.00
99,749;560.00
i{I
93
-1, 52,220,000.00 1
5,109,000.00`1
7,000.00
733,500.00
5,183,000.00
426,000.00 1
705,500.00 1 ;. 64,386,-
000.00 .{'
1f
11 94
-) 72,461;955.00 )
1,216,700.00` 1
1,836,000.00
I
'276,100_00 1
1`,258,500.00 1
1,975,000.00
1
1,816,750.00 1 (
80,841;005.00
_� 1) 95
1 41,455,602.25 1
3,478,800.00 1
551,000.00
1
584,900.00 1
10,469,000.00 (
359,000.00
1
136,500.00 1
". 57,034,802.25
{I
1
96
1 56,047;370.00 1
4,164,405.00
(
610,000.00
1
'596,500`.00 1
: 211,500100 1
:5,083,000.00
1
951,705.25 1 .:
67,664,480.25
�l 11 97
1 72,334,758.00 1
16,573,385.87
1
12,615;000.00
698,000.00 1
17,129,700.00 1
4,372,388.00 (
1,677,600.00 1::
125,400,831.87
{I
98
1 60,673,258.00 1
11,067,876.76
(
3,146,000.00
(
438,100.00 1
8,266,515.00 1
1,477,761.00
i
281,000.00 )
85,350,510.76
,1I
1
11 99
1 7,463,195.00 1
211,000.00
1
1
1
89,000.00 1
1 -
15,000,000.00 1
22,763,.195:00
11
Monthly Building Report. Municipality of Clarington Printed on March 4, 1999 at 13:48 Building Starts (Actual; tram 99.02.01 to 99.02.28 Page 1
Permit I Name Contractor Twp I Lot I Con i Lt Pt ( MPlan i 1ORPlan Street Address Type ( Units Sq Ft Value
(� 98.0622
Name
HUNTINGTON, LARRY
SAME
Contractor
I COUR 134
Lot
( 2
' 230
824
46 ABURN LANE
SFD/ADD/
Units
392.0
28,000.00
96.0709
99.0001
HALMINEN BUILDING CO
SAME
COUR
COUR
30
2
( 11
1902 (
8 WILKINS CRESCENT
SFD//
1
1,366.0
75,130.00
II 98.0710
KAITLIN
HALMINEN BUILDING CO
I SAME
SAME
COUR
30
( 2
14
1902
2 WILKINS CRESCENT
SFD//
1
2,252.0
124,000.00
(� 98.0774
99.0011
GREEN MARTIN HOLDING
KAITLIN
GROUP LIMITED
BOWM
17
1
23 1
1940
9 IVORY COURT
( TWH//
1
1,312.0
72,160.00
111,000.00
98.0775
GREEN MARTIN HOLDING
( KAITLIN
GROUP LIMITED
( BOWM
17
1
( 23-2
1 1940
( 7 IVORY COURT
TWH//
1
1,408.0
77,000.00
(�
(I 98.0776
GREEN MARTIN HOLDING
KAITLIN
GROUP LIMITED
BOHM
17
1
23-3
1940
5 IVORY COURT
TWH//
1
1,140.0
62,700.00
( 118,000.00
u 98.0777
I GREEN MARTIN HOLDING
KAITLIN
GROUP LIMITED
BOHM
17
1
123-4
( 1940
3 IVORY COURT
TWH//
( 1
1,007.0
55,385.00
1,319.0
98.0778
I GREEN MARTIN HOLDING
( KAITLIN
GROUP LIMITED
BOWM
17
I 1
23-5
1940
1 IVORY COURT
( TWH//
1
1,240.0 (
68,200
-00
98.0966
57,000.00
I HALMINEN BUILDING CO
I SAME
99.0023
COUR
34
1
22L
1931 1
115 KILGANNON AVENUE
I SDD//
1
( 1,593.0
88,000.00
TWH//
u 98.0967
1,129.0
HALMINEN BUILDING CO
SAME
(�
COUR
34
1
22R
1931
117 KILGANNON AVENUE
SDD//
1
I 1,220.0
67,000.00
( 25 PIDDUCK STREET
98.0968
1
HALMINEN BUILDING CO
( SAME
COUR
34
1
26L
1931
85 KILGANNON AVENUE
SDD//
1
I 1,086.0
60,000.00
1945
98.0972
TWH//
( HALMINEN BUILDING CO
SAME
( 57,000.00
COUR
34
1
28L
1931
( 74 KILGANNON AVENUE
SOD//
1
1,366.0
75,000.00
42-1
98.0973
( 22 CORNISH DRIVE
HALMINEN BUILDING CO
SAME
1,029.0
COUR
34
1
28R
( 1931 (
72 KILGANNON AVENUE
SDD//
1
1,619.0
89,000.00
1
98.1011
1931
HALMINEN BUILDING CO
SAME
( 1
COUR
34
( 1
21
1 1931
121 KILGANNON AVENUE
SFD//
1
2,149.0
118,195.00
34
98.1012
42-3
HALMINEN BUILDING CO
SAME
TWH//
COUR
34
1
23L
1931
107 KILGANNON AVENUE
( SDD//
( 1
1,754.0
96,470.00
COUR
98.1013
I 1
HALMINEN BUILDING CO
SAME
16 CORNISH DRIVE
COUR
34
1
23R
1931
109 KILGANNON AVEI4UE
SDD//
1
1,937.0
106,535
00 �)
98.1014
HALMINEN BUILDING CO
SAME
COUR
34
1
24L
1931
99 KILGANNON AVENUE
SDD//
( 1
1,519.0
83,545.00
I�
98.1015
HALMINEN BUILDING CO
SAME
( COUR
34
1
24R
1931
101 KILGANNON AVENUE
SDD//
1
1,608.0
68,440.00
(�
98.1021
CARNOVALE HOMES
1008941
ONTARIO INC
COUR
34
2
43
1847
85 ROBERT ADAMS DRIVE
SFD//
1
( 1,904.0
105,GD0.00
�)
!..
KAITLIN GROUP LTD
SAME
BOWM
17
1
17
1 1944 I
112 WESTSIDE DRIVE
SFD//
1
2,215.0
121,825.00
98.1044
r
u Permit
Name
Contractor
Twp
Lot
( Con
LtPt
MPlan
1ORPlan Street Address
Type
Units
Sq FL
Value
99.0001
I VERMEERSCH, REGINALD
I SAME
COUR
35
2
2
40R-3472 18 FOXHUNT TRAIL
( SFD//
1
1,795.0
97,0170.00
b 99.0010
KAITLIN
GROUP
SAME
BOWM
17
1
15
( 1944
( 116 WESTSIDE DRIVE
SFD//
1 (
2,008.0
111,000.00
�)
99.0011
' KAITLIN
GROUP
SAME
BOHM (
17
1
21
1944
1 100 WESTSIDE DRIVE
I SFD//
( 1
2,015.0
111,000.00
(� 99.0013
( CUMMINGS, ADAM
SAME
BOWM
319 COVE ROAD
SFD//
1
1,978.0
109,000.00
(� 99.0020
CARNOVALE HOMES
1008941 ONTARIO INC
COUR
34
2
44
1847
I ( 83 ROBERT ADAMS DRIVE
SFD//
1
2,142.0
( 118,000.00
99.0021
1298933
ONTARIO
INC
CARNOVALE DEVELOPMENTS
COUR
30
3
30-1
1945
31 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH//
1
1,319.0
( 73,000.00
99.0022
( 1298933
ONTARIO
INC
CARNOVALE DEVELOPMENTS
COUR
30
3
30-2
1945
29 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH//
( I
1,029.0
57,000.00
99.0023
1298933
ONTARIO
INC
CARNOVALE DEVELOPMENTS
COUR (
30
( 3
30-3
1945
27 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH//
1
1,129.0
63,000.00
(�
99.0024
1298933
ONTARIO
INC
CARNOVALE DEVELOPMENTS
COUR 130
3
30-4
1 1945
( 25 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH//
1
1,129.0
( 63,000.00
(�
Q 99.0025
1298933
ONTARIO
INC
CARNOVALE DEVELOPMENTS
I COUR
30
3
30-5
1945
23 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH//
1
1,029.0
( 57,000.00
99.0026
1138330
ONTARIO
INC (
1008941 ONTARIO INC
COUR
34
1
42-1
1931
( 22 CORNISH DRIVE
TWH//
1
1,029.0
( 57,000.00
(� 99.0027
1138330
ONTARIO
INC (
1008941 ONTARIO INC
COUR (
34
1
42-2
1931
( 20 CORNISH DRIVE
I TWH//
( 1
1,029.0
57,000.00
99.0028
1138330
ONTARIO
INC
1008941 ONTARIO INC
COUR
34
1
42-3
1931
( 18 CORNISH DRIVE
TWH//
1
1,319.0
73,000.00
ONTARIO
INC
1008941 ONTARIO INC
COUR
34
I 1
42-4
1931
16 CORNISH DRIVE
TWH//
1
1,319.0
( 73,000.00
99.0029
1138330
'
--L
-
L--- --
---_._L
-. ---
-�-
----
1
Totals
33
50,356.0
2,780,585.00
Building Permit Fees $ 29,263.50
Plumbing Permit Fees $ 0.00
-' Total Permits Issued 34.00
CD
0-`
98.0988
:1298933 ONTARIO INC
( CARNOVALE DEVELOPMENTS
COUR � ;30
3
29-3 (
1945.
139
PIDDUCK STREET
TWH// :
1
1,029.0 (
57,000
00
�)
98.0989
1298933 ONTARIO INC
CARNOVALE DEVELOPMENTS
COUR ( :30
3
29-4.
1945
37 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH// :
1
1,129.0
63,000
00 {�
98.0990
( ;1298933 ONTARIO INC
CARNOVALE!DEVELOPMENTS
COUR
30
( 3
29-5
1945
35 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH//
1
1,029.0
57,000.00
f�
98.1021
CARNOVALE HOMES
1008941 ONTARIO INC
COUR
134
2
43 :
1647.
85 ROBERT ADAMS DRIVE
SFD//
1
1,904.0
105,000
00
(�
98.1030
HELE, BRIAN
SAME
:) COUR ( '.
32
2 ..
31 :
790
31 LYNDALE CRESCENT
( SFD/ACC/GARAGE
326.5
7,000
00 {�
98.1042
CLINIC BUILDINGS LTD
SAME
COUR
34
2
VARCOE ROAD/HIGHWAY #2.
COM/ADD/HEALTH RETAI
3,143.0
: 200,000.00
�)
98.1044
KAITLIN GROUP LTD
SAME
BOWM
17
1 :
17
1944'
112 WESTSIDE DRIVE
SFD// :
1
( 2,215-0 (
121,825.00
�� .98.1045
KAITLIN:GROUP LTD
SAME
BOWM
,17
1
20 ',
1944
106 WESTSIDE DRIVE
( SFD//
1
2,008.0
110,440
00 II
99.0010
�..KAITLIN:GROUP
SAME
;.� BOWM
17
11 '.
15
1944:'
) 116 WESTSIDE DRIVE
SFD//
1
( 2,008.0 (
111,000.00
99.0011
KAITLIN GROUP (
SAME
BOHM '
17
1
21
19441
100 WESTSIDE DRIVE
( SFD//
1
2,015.0
111,000
00
99.0012
GREEN MARTIN DEVEL
SAME
) BOWM
17
1
2340 HIGHWAY #2
DEM/SFD/
99.0013
( CUMMINGS, ADAM
SAME
BOHM
(
'� 319 COVE ROAD
( SFD//
1
7,9%8.0
109'ooc'
00
99.0020
�..CARNOVALE HOMES :
1008941 ONTARIO INC
COUR
34
2
44
1847'.
83 ROBERT ADAMS DRIVE
SFD//
1
2,132 0 1
118,000.00
---------------
.�
(� Permit
Name
Contractors
Twp
Lot
Con
Lt Pt (
MPlan
1ORPlan
) street:Address:
Type
( Units
Sq Ft
Value
99.0021
:1298933 ONTARIO INC
CARNOVALE DEVELOPMENTS
COUR
30
3 -
30-1.
1945"
31 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH//
1
( 1,319.0
73,000.00
99.0022
( .1298933 ONTARIO<INC
CARNOVALE DEVELOPMENTS
COUR
30
( 3 :.
30-2'
1945
29 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH//
1
1,029.0
57,000.00
(� 99.0023
1 .1298933 ONTARIO INC
CARNOVALE DEVELOPMENTS
') COUR
30
3
30-3f
1945:
27 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH//
1
1,129.0
63,000.00
�I 99.0024
( 1298933 'ONTARIO INC
CARNOVALE DEVELOPMENTS
COUR
30
3 ',
30-4
1945
'.� 25 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH//
1
1,129.0
63,000.00
q 99.0025
ONTARIO:INC
CARNOVALE:DEVELOPMENTS
COUR
30
3
30-5,
1945
(
23 PIDDUCK STREET
TWH//
1
1,029.0
:. 57,000.00
99.0026
.1298933
�.:1138330 ONTARIO INC
..1008941 ONTARIO INC
COUR
34
1 -:
( 42-1.
1931
22 CORNISH DRIVE
TWH//
1
1,029.0 (
`. 57,000.00
99.0027
( 1138330 ONTARIO INC
1008941 ONTARIO INC
COUR ( .34
I 1
42-2
1931
) 20 CORNISH DRIVE
TWH//
1
' 1,029.0 (
: 57,000.00
99.0028
( 1138330 ONTARIO INC (
1008941 ONTARIO INC
COUR
34
1
42-3`
1931
18 CORNISH DRIVE
TWH//
1
1,319.0
73,000.00
99.0029
1138330 ONTARIO INC
1008941 ONTARIO INC
�. COUR
34
1
42-4
1931
16 CORNISH DRIVE
TWH// :
1
1,319.0 (
73,000.00
99.0032
800630 ONTARIO LTD
SAME
BOHM
142-146-150 KING STREET
MUL/ALT/FIRECODE
( :
( 7,500.0 i
30,000.00
".
99.0035
PRICE, TERRY
SAME
DARL
6
3 -
( (
LAMBS ROAD
REN/SFD/ ::
( -
2,144.0
-
99.0037
DAIZE, MILTON
LIFESTYLE SUNROOM
COUR
28
`) 3138 COURTICE ROAD NORTH
SFD/ADD/SUNROOM
( 120.0
13,000.00
u 99.0038
I SARNOVSKY, JAMES
SAME
) COUR �..
31
3
35
783
) 80'HROADLANDS:CRESCENT
SFD/ALT/FIRE CODE
( 1,644.0
3,.000.00
q 99.0054
RIDGE PINE PARK INC
SAME
WILM
35
BF
1 WHEELHOUSE DRIVE
( PLM/ALT/LAUNDRY PIPE
500.00
Q 99.0056
( BOWEN, ALFRED & VICT (
SAME
�'.BOHM (
)
2194 HIGHWAY #2
I DEM/SFD/
Totals
23
75,684.5
17,318,265.00
Building Permit
Fees $
182,057.50
Plumbing Permit
Fees $
50.00
_.
Total
Permits Issued
35.00
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: i GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE File#
Date: MARCH 22, 1999 Res. #
Report No.: WD-15-99 By-Law#
Subject: NORTHEAST BOWMANVILLE SUBDIVISION, PHASE 1,
PLAN 10M-840, BOWMANVILLE
`CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE',
TRIBUTARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WORKS,EXCLUSIVE OF
THE SOPER CREEK EROSION WORKS
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and 'Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report WD-15-99 be received;
2. THAT the Director of Public Works be authorized to issue a `Certificate of Acceptance' for
the Tributary Stormwater Management Works, iExclusive of the Soper Creek Erosion
Works, constructed under Plan I OM-840.
REPORT
1.0 ATTACHMENTS
No. 1: Key Map
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 The former Corporation of the Town of Newcastle,now the Corporation of the Municipality
of Clarington, entered into a Subdivision Agreement, registered April 18, 1991, with Eiram
Development Corporation to develop lands by plan of subdivision, located in Bowmanville
and described as Plan IOM-840 (Attachment No. 1). The agreement required the developer
to construct all roadworks, including hot-mix paving,sidewalks, curb and gutter, street trees,
a storm drainage system and streetlights, hereinafter referred to as the `Works'.
REPORT NO.: WD-15-99 PAGE 2
i
I
2.2 This particular subdivision agreement provides for the separation of the Works into three (3)
stages:
(a) Storm Sewer Works; I
(b) Roads and Above Ground Services; and
(c) Tributary Stormwater Management Works, Exclusive of the Soper Creek Erosion
i
Works
f1
a
2.2 The Storm Sewer Works were issued a `Certificate of Completion' and subsequent
`Certificate of Acceptance' by the Director of Public Works, as per the maintenance
requirements set out in the Subdivision Agreement. j
2.3 The Roads and Above Ground Services were issued a `Certificate of Completion' and are
presently on maintenance.
2.4 The Tributary Stormwater Management Works, Exclusive of the Soper Creek Erosion
Works were issued a `Certificate of Completion' dated September 1, 1993. This initiated a
four (4) year maintenance period which expired on September 1, 1997. The Works have
been reinspected and all deficiencies have now been rectified to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works.
2.5 It is now appropriate to issue a `Certificate of Acceptance' for the Tributary Stormwater
Management Works, Exclusive of the Soper Creek Erosion Works. The subdivision
agreement requires Council approval prior to the issuance of this `Acceptance Certificate'.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
Stephen A. Vokes,P. Eng., Franklin Wu,
Director of Public Works Chief Administrative Officer
NAC*SAV*ce
1109
NORTHEAST BOWMANVILLE
{ N IOM-840 TR RY STORMWATER
MA GEMENT WO
a
Q
u
E
BOWMANVILLEt,
UEI
SUBJECT
a0�a Q° SITE DRAWN BY:J.R.M DATETEBRUARY 1999
0 REPORT WD-15-99
+q, `� C es nStreetEaat KEY MAP ATTACHMENT NO. 1
1110