HomeMy WebLinkAboutWD-35-84;3 r 3/e
CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
HAMPTON, ONTARIO
LOB 1JO
R. DUPUIS, P. ENG., DIRECTOR
TEL. (416) 263 -2231
987.5039
REPORT TO THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION OOMMITTEE
MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1984.
REPORT NO.: WD -35 -84
SUBJECT: REVIEW UNDER THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT
! OF THE CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR
MUNICIPAL ROAD PROJECTS, E.A. FILE NO.
2 -81- 0002 -000 AND FOR MUNICIPAL SEWER AND
WATER PROJECTS, E.A. FILE NO. 2 -81- 0003 -000.
I' • 1 lal WAN •
It is respectfully recommended:
1. That this report be received; and,
2. That the Minister of the Environment be advised that
the Town of Newcastle endorses the Municipal Engineers
Association Working Group as its agent in the
preparation and approval process for Class
Environmental Assessments (E.A.'s) for Municipal Road
Projects and Municipal Sewer and Water Projects; and,
...2
IF _ 4 (¢)
Page 2
REPORT NO.: WD -35 -84
6(i
3. That the Minister of the Environment be advised that
in so doing, the Town of Newcastle supports the
position taken by the Municipal Engineers Association
(M.E.A.) relating to conflicts arising from the
Government review of said documents, especially in the
following areas which are considered fundamental
principles:
i) The requirement for construction guidelines
ii) Timing of lard acquisition
iii) Projects proceed before bump -up resolution
iv) Requirement for broader public notification
A Buildings and sites of heritage importance.
4. That the Minister of the Environment be advised that
if the said issues, and any others considered
important by the Municipal Engineers Association
Working Group, cannot be resolved, the Town of
Newcastle will support the Working Group in a hearing
before the Environmental Assessment Board; and,
5. That copies of this resolution and report be forwarded
to the Minister of the Environment and the Municipal
Engineers Association.
...3
Page 3
REPORT NO.: WD -35 -84
The Environmental Assessment Act was put in effect by the
Province in 1975, but Municipal projects were exempted from
its requirements until Class Environmental Assessment
Procedures could be established and approved.
A Class Environmental Assessment establishes a planning aril
design procedure for commonly recurring projects having
( similar circumstances. For example; reconstruction of an
existing road to provide vertical and horizontal alignment
and cross - section, to design standards occurs in many
locations in many municipalities. Accordingly, a standard
procedure to satisfy environmental concerns is desirable.
By having this "Class" procedure, the detailed, costly, and
time- consuming requirements of a full environmental
assessment are eliminated.
Rather than have all municipalities in the Province develop
their own Class E.A.'s, the Municipal Engineers Association
volunteered the services of its membership in such a task.
The Working Group established by M.E.A. prepared two Class
documents; one for roads, and one for sewer and water
projects, and both were submitted to the Minister for review
in early 1982. On January 31, 1984, the Minister of the
Environment issued the Provincial review of these documents
and requested all interested municipalities aryl agencies to
respond by April 2, 1984.
M
Page 4
REPORT NO.: WD -35 -84
The Class E.A.'s and corresponding Government reviews are
very comprehensive and complex documents which are most
easily understood by the group responsible for their
preparation. It is, therefore, reasonable to designate that
group to resolve any differences of opinion as to the
acceptability of the documents or the validity of the issues
raised by the Government reviewers. The Town should,
therefore, recognize the Municipal Engineers Association as
its agent in this process.
With respect to the most important issues, the following
have been identified:
1. Construction Guidelines
E.A. File No. 2 -81- 0002 -000, Page 36, Condition # 2
E.A. File No. 2 -81 -0003 -000, Page 41, Condition # 2
The government reviewers have indicated a requirement
to have construction guidelines prepared to deal with
such matters as noise generated by construction
equipment, groundwater interference, etc. It should
be pointed out to the Minister that the Class E.A.'s
as submitted, prescribe a planning and design
procedure which provides ample opportunity for
concerns in these areas to be identified prior to
construction, and to have specific conditions imposed
in construction specifications to satisfy the conerns.
Construction guidelines become redundant in this
context.
...5
-'-�-G(�)
Page 5
REPORT NO.: WD -35 -84
2. Timing of Land Acquisition
E.A. File No. 2 -81- 0002 -000, Pages 30 & 32
Amendments 6.2 & 7.2
E.A. File No. 2 -81 -0003 -000, Pages 34 & 36
Amendments 2.2 & 3.2
The government reviewers have indicated that land
acquisition should not be allowed to proceed until
after publication of the Environmental Study Report.
This is too late since, if the need to expropriate
arises, an additional eighteen (18) months to two (2)
years will be required. Laud acquisition should be
initiated as soon as possible to cover this
eventuality. Surely, by the time the proponent of a
project has proceeded past the preliminary design
phase in the planning process of -the Class E.A., any
roadblocks to the project will be identified and
common sense will preclude land acquisition.
3. Bump -up
E.A. File No. 2 -81- 0002 -000, Page 33, Amendment # 9
E.A. File No. 2 -81 -0003 -000, Page 38, Amendment # 5
The Government reviewers have suggested that once a
bump -up is initiated, all activities on the project
should cease. It is the Working Group's contention
that this will impose an unnecessary delay since,
again, a minor issue may stand as a roadblock to an
overall project. An objector may use this
opportunity to frivolously delay a project which,
while it may be perceived to cause him problems, will,
in fact, provide a greater overall benefit.
Page 6
.REPORT NO.: WD -35 -84
3. Bump -up Cont'd .
With respect to bump -up, there is no requirement
limiting the amount of tim a bump -up may be
considered, therefore, a project could be delayed
inlefi.nitely.
4. Broader Public Notification
E.A. File No. 2 -81- 0002 -000, Pages 30 & 32
Amendments 6.3 & 7.3
E.A. File No. 2 -81- 0003 -000, Pages 34 & 36
Amendments 2.3 & 3.3
The Government reviewers have indicated that they do
not feel that the public is afforded sufficient
opportunity for input by the proposed planning and
design procedure (flow chart). It is our feeling that
this matter was dealt with during the preparation of
the Class E.A.'s in consultation with M.O.E.
representatives on the Working Group. The general
feeling was that there was more than ample opportunity
for public involvement and that it need not be
solicited at every turn.
5. Buildings and Sites of Heritage Importance
E.A. File No. 2 -81- 0003 -000, Page 40, Amendment # 9
Ministry of Citizenship and Culture contends that
projects proposed for exemption from any form of
Environmental Assessment should be at least subjected
to a screening process where heritage buildings and
sites are involved on the basis that maintenance and
operational activities may deface them.
NWA
Nil
Page 7
REPORT NO.: WD -35 -84
5. Buildings and Sites of Heritage Importance Cont'd.
It is our feeling that�frcm a practical viewpoint,it
is impossible to preserve all but the most
historically significant buildings, sites, and
equipment.
This report and its recomendations should be submitted to
( the Minister of the Environment and the Municipal Engineers
Association as a demonstration of the Town of Newcastle's
interest and concern over the requirements of the
Environmental Asessment Act as they pertain to
municipalities. Furthermore, as there is cause for concern,
the Town should lend whatever support it can should there be
need for a hearing to resolve the above issues and any
others identified by the Municipal Engineers Association
Working Group on which the Director of Public Works sits as
the Town's representative.
Respectfully submitted,
A�z -
R.G. Dupuis, P. Eng.,
Director of Public Works.
RGDcjco 1
March 13, 1984. /