Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2022-06-06
General Government Committee Post-Meeting Agenda Date:June 6, 2022 Time:9:30 a.m. Location:Council Members (in Chambers or MS Teams) | Members of the Public (MS Teams) Inquiries and Accommodations: For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations for persons attending, please contact: Lindsey Patenaude, Committee Coordinator, at 905-623-3379, ext. 2106 or by email at lpatenaude@clarington.net. Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Audio/Video Record: The Municipality of Clarington makes an audio and/or video record of General Government Committee meetings. If you make a delegation or presentation at a General Government Committee meeting, the Municipality will be recording you and will make the recording public by on the Municipality’s website, www.clarington.net/calendar Noon Recess: Please be advised that, as per the Municipality of Clarington’s Procedural By-law, this meeting will recess at 12:00 noon, for a one hour lunch break, unless otherwise determined by the Committee. Cell Phones: Please ensure all cell phones, mobile and other electronic devices are turned off or placed on non-audible mode during the meeting. Copies of Reports are available at www.clarington.net/archive The Revised Agenda will be published on Friday after 3:30 p.m. Late items added or a change to an item will appear with a * beside them. Pages 1.Call to Order 2.Land Acknowledgement Statement 3.Declaration of Interest 4.Announcements 5.Presentations/Delegations (10 minute time limit) 5.1.Delegation of Monika Machacek, Chief Executive Officer, Clarington Public Library, Museums, and Archives, Regarding 2021 Highlights and 2022 Key Objectives 5 5.2.Delegation of Lauren Millier, Senior Strategist, Deloitte, Regarding Report CAO-005-22 Economic Development Strategy 13 6.Reports/Correspondence Related to Presentations/Delegations 6.1.CAO-005-22 Clarington Economic Development Strategy 24 7.Communications 7.1.City of Cambridge, Regarding Request to the Region of Waterloo to Consider Free Public Transportation on Election Days 74 (Motion to Endorse) 7.2.Minutes of the Newcastle Village Community Hall Board dated April 19, 2022 76 (Receive for Information) 8.Staff Reports, Staff Memos and New Business Consideration 8.1.Public Works 8.1.1.Memo-029-22 Clarington Cricket Pitch 79 8.1.2.New Business - Newcastle Service Club Sign (Councillor Zwart)81 8.1.3.New Business - Clarington Waterfront Trail Signs (Councillor Zwart) 83 Page 2 8.2.Community Services 8.2.1.CSD-012-22 Diversity in Clarington – 2022 Update on Diversity Initiatives and Clarington’s Diversity Advisory Committee 84 8.3.Legislative Services 8.3.1.LGS-010-22 Durham Region Electric Kick Scooter By-law 92 8.3.2.LGS-012-22 Cemetery By-law Review and Update 95 *8.3.3.New Business - Enforcement By-law (Councillor Traill)135 (Requires 2/3 Vote to be Discussed) 8.4.Financial Services 8.4.1.FSD-019-22 2021 Annual Investment Report 136 8.4.2.FSD-024-22 Asset Management Plan 149 8.4.3.FSD-025-22 Delegation of Authority for Approval of 2021 Financial Statements 495 8.4.4.FSD-026-22 Supply and Delivery of One Single Axle and Three Tandem Axle Cab and Chassis 498 8.4.5.FSD-027-22 Waste and Recycling Collection and Disposal – Road Sweepings 503 8.4.6.FSD-028-22 Additional Funding for Shaw House Renovation 512 8.4.7.FSD-029-22 Newcastle Community Park Construction 516 8.5.CAO Office 8.5.1.CAO-004-22 Citizen Centric Ground Floor – Municipal Administrative Centre 523 9.Unfinished Business 10.Questions to Department Heads/Request for Staff Report(s) *10.1.Clarington Becoming a Bicycle Friendly Community *10.2.Paving and Possible Improvements to West Beach Road Page 3 *10.3.Connectivity from Liberty Street to Bowmanville Waterfront 11.Confidential Items 12.Adjournment Page 4 Clarington Public Library, Museum & Archives Monika Machacek, Chief Executive Officer June 6, 2022Page 5 22Monika MachacekPage 6 2021: Apart & Connected Wow! 34,000 views on You Tube!! Page 7 Closing the Book on Fines We believe in changing the perception of public libraries and creating an inclusive and barrier -free place to learn and discover. Fines are a punitive system that result in negative experiences and perpetuates the economic inequity of print versus digital library users Page 8 Lingering Impacts of Covid -19 Page 9 Digital Literacy Multilingual Collections Space at Libraries & Museums 2022 Key Objectives Page 10 What ’s Clarington Reading? 2021 Top 5 Check Outs 1.A Gambling Man by David Baldacci 2.Where the Crawdads Sing by Delia Owens 3.The Russian by James Patterson 4.The Law of Innocence by Michael Connelly 5.Invisible Girl by Lisa Jewell Page 11 Monika Machacek, Chief Executive Officer mmachacek@clarington-library.on.ca (905) 623-7322 x 2702 Contact & Questions Page 12 Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Presentation to General Government Committee June 6, 2022 Page 13 © Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities. Clarington Draft Economic Development Strategy General Government Committee Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy 2 Strategy Methodology Snapshot of the Economy Stakeholder Input Strategic Priorities 5 Year Action Plan Agenda Page 14 © Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities. Strategy Development Process General Government Meeting 1. Clarington’s Strategic Priorities •Business Interviews and Workshop •External Stakeholder Interviews, Online Business and Community Survey •SOARR Assessment 3. Stakeholder Engagement •Key Findings Report •Priorities, Objectives and Action Planning •Implementation Considerations 4. Strategy Formulation •Corporate Strategic Plan •Official Plan •Strategic Projects 2. Market Analysis and Competitive Position •Situational Analysis •Benchmarking and Service Delivery Review, Investment Readiness Assessment •Council and Staff Interviews Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy 3Page 15 © Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities. Engaged Communities Sustainable Infrastructure Growth Legacy Projects Environmental Sustainability Strong Economy Complete the implementation of downtown plans Creating partnerships in broadband expansion Expanding transportation networks into commercial and industrial areas Exploring an economic development strategy framework in collaboration with business community Municipal Goals 2019-2022 Corporate Strategic Priorities Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy 4Page 16 © Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities. Population of 102,415 people, up 11% from 2016, growing faster than Durham Region and the Province 68% of the population is under 65 years of age, 17% is under 14 years of age Labour force of 84,757 people, up 17% from 2016 and with a participation rate of 71% -majority commute out for employment 53% of the population has some form of advanced education Key sectors include Energy, Manufacturing, Agriculture/Agri- food, Tourism, Construction Economy characterized by micro-businesses, 16% employ between 1-4 workers, and 9% employ 5-19 employees. 72% of all businesses are sole proprietors 357 farms, 68% occupy 129 acres or less Key Economic Indicators Market Analysis and Competitive Position Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy 5Page 17 © Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities. Municipality is on the cusp of a significant growth trajectory Community remains relatively affordable and provides a unique blend of urban and rural living OPG investment will facilitate a shift from a small business economy to one that attracts high value investment and employment opportunities The planned expansion of the GO Transit network will bring further economic growth opportunities Municipality needs to improve its economic development service delivery and address the critical need for serviced employment land There needs to be more local employment opportunities as most workers commute out each day There needs to be a focus on strengthening mainstreets and downtown cores and improved support and services for small business Improve support for tourism and hospitality sector considering trends for agri-tourism and agri-business Stakeholder Input Market Analysis and Competitive Position Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy 6Page 18 © Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities. Several initiatives are underway that will shape the urban form and economic growth trajectory of the community OPG investment will create substantial employment and facilitate the creation of a high-tech energy hub Clarington will need to support this effort with the development of the Courtice Waterfront and Energy Park Bowmanville West Urban Centre and MTSA Secondary Plan will provide for a concentration of new commercial and mixed-use development MTSAs in Bowmanville and Courtice will reshape the neighbourhoods around them in terms of urban form, employment opportunities and transit accessibility Canadian Tire Motorsport Park has the potential to become a major event and hospitality asset in the community Leveraging the rural economy opportunities that support the growth and sustainability of the tourism and agriculture sectors Catalysts for Economic Growth Determining the Priorities Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy 7Page 19 © Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities. Strategic Priorities Optimizing our Economic Development Effort Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy 8Page 20 © Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities. Priority: Strengthen the Business Innovation Ecosystem Centred on a more deliberate effort to engage and understand the needs of local businesses, understand the long-term impact of COVID and support new entrepreneurial growth and investment Objectives: •Implement a Formal Business Retention and Expansion Program •Enhance Development Approvals Process projects •Align Target Sector Opportunities with New Growth Areas Priority: Cultivate an Innovative Land Use Framework Centred on providing an increased amount of employment land and creating the urban environment that will attract the businesses and workforce needed to support high value employment growth through the approval of key secondary plans Objectives: •Expand inventory of serviced, shovel ready Employment Land •Enhance Policies and Incentives •Engage Local Businesses and Regional Partners Priority: Target High Growth Business and Investment Centred on working with Durham Region to better understand regional target sectors, the development of a regional high-tech energy hub and the role of Clarington in attracting future energy investment Objectives: •Develop an Energy-Sector Value Proposition •Implement a Proactive Marketing Campaign •Build Economic Development Capacity Strategic Priorities + Action Plan Economic Development Objectives Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy 9Page 21 © Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities. Strategy acknowledges the 2-year commitment with the Clarington Board of Trade to deliver business retention and expansion support (BR+E) and marketing Reflects the intent to build internal capacity to support a broader range of economic development services and programming with a short-term focus on improving the Municipality’s overall investment readiness Objectives and actions have been informed by stakeholder input and related research Supports the development of the local economy and reflects best practices in local economic development Recognizes the need to collaborate and cooperate with local and regional economic development partners Strategy Formulation Strategic Priorities Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy 10Page 22 © Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities. Thank-you Q+A Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy 11Page 23 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: June 6, 2022 Report Number: CAO-005-22 Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution#: File Number: By-law Number: Report Subject: Clarington Economic Development Strategy Recommendations: 1. That Report CAO-005-22, and any related delegations or communication items, be received for information; 2. That Council adopt the Economic Development Strategy in principle; 3. That staff be authorized to advance the catalyst projects as outlined in this report ; 4. That staff prepare an implementation report to be presented as part of the preparation of Council’s 2023-2026 Corporate Strategic Plan; and 5. That all interested parties listed in Report CAO-005-22 be advised of Council’s decision. Page 24 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report CAO-005-22 Report Overview To ensure that the Municipality is best positioned to capitalize on the expected growth in our community, staff have worked with MDB Insight Inc. (now Deloitte) to develop a robust economic development strategy. This report provides insight into how the strat egy was developed, feedback received from stakeholders, and highlights areas in which Clarington should focus to drive future economic development growth. The Strategy reinforces much of the work currently being done by the Municipality and our community partners, while at the same time highlighting the areas of improvement to build our community’s capacity to support economic development initiatives. It also puts a spotlight on major catalyst projects, which have the potential to drive further economic prosperity in our community. 1. Background Council Strategic Plan 1.1 As part of the 2019 – 2022 Municipality of Clarington Strategic Plan, Council directed staff to “[e]xplore an economic development strategy/framework in collaboration with the business community and other stakeholders.” 1.2 Council’s Strategic Plan, under the “Strong Economy” priority, has several other key economic development goals such as: a) completion of our downtown plans; b) creation of partnerships in broadband expansion, working towards one hundred per cent connectivity; c) creation of partnerships to promote investment in infrastructure to make natural gas more accessible; and d) expansion of our transportation network into commercial and industrial areas . Clarington’s Official Plan 1.3 In 2016, Council adopted a new Official Plan, which was subsequently approved by the Region in 2017. The vision and principles set by Council in the Official Plan speak to the level of interplay between sustainable development, healthy communities, growth management and economic development. Chapter 7 of the Official Plan - Growing a Prosperous Community presents the main Council policies and objectives for economic development in Clarington. Page 25 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report CAO-005-22 1.4 The Official Plan’s Principle of Economic Vitality promotes a competitive and adaptable economic environment to encourage investment and diversity of employment opportunities. The Principle of Balanced Growth expresses our desire to place job creation as a key priority to complement residential growth. 1.5 Clarington Council, through the Official Plan, established key objectives for economic development. These objectives include attaining one job for eve ry three residents in Clarington, accommodating 50% of employment in employment lands, supporting and retaining small businesses in our traditional downtowns, and promoting and supporting arts, culture, and tourism. 1.6 To implement these objectives, the Official Plan lists some key tools including: a) strategic infrastructure investment; b) incentives; c) public-private partnerships; d) joint projects with the Boards of Business Improvement Areas; e) community improvement plans; and f) development permit system. 1.7 Policy 7.3.1 of the Official Plan directs the preparation of an economic development strategy at the time of the statutory review of the Official Plan. Council has approved the review of the Clarington Official Plan that will start this year in parallel to the completion of the Regional Municipal Comprehensive Review. The Economic Development Strategy will be one of the foundations for the review of Clarington’s Official Plan. Developing Clarington’s Economic Development Strategy 1.8 In Report CAO-003-21, Council approved the preparation of an Economic Development Strategy. Based on this direction the Municipality retained MDB Insight (“MDB”), now known as Deloitte to prepare the Economic Development Strategy. Deloitte has experience in drafting economic development strategies and ha s done work across Ontario, including supporting municipalities with various models of economic development delivery. Page 26 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report CAO-005-22 1.9 The Strategy would address several matters including: a) the goals and objectives set out in Chapter 7 of the Clarington Official Plan; b) several goals in Clarington’s 2019 – 2022 Strategic Plan (see sections 1.1 and 1.2 of this report); c) annual workplans; d) creation of an economic development toolkit (to provide to prospective investors and other interested parties – inclusive of priority employment lands, strategic initiatives, incentives, long-rang vision); e) confirmation / clarification of roles and responsibilities internally and externally; f) timing, frequency, and content of reporting between and amongst Municipal staff, The Clarington Board of Trade (CBOT), and Council; g) strengthening of relationships within the local business community (e.g., CBOT, the Municipality, BIAs, Newcastle and District Chamber of Commerce, and MUSH sector); and h) performance measures. 2. Strategy Drafting Stakeholder Engagement 2.1 In November and December of 2021, there were a total of 20 interviews conducted with local stakeholders. The stakeholders included: local business owners, businesses within the development industry, representatives of the Business Improvement Areas of Bowmanville, Newcastle, and Orono, the Clarington Board of Trade, Clarington Agricultural Advisory Committee, Clarington Tourism Advisory Committee, and Clarington Tourism staff. 2.2 Another facet of engagement included a community consultation survey that was open to residents, business owners, and operators in Clarington. The survey received 114 responses at its conclusion. 2.3 It was of critical importance to ensure that local business partners received additional time with Deloitte to be able to understand their unique perspective as it relates to economic development in Clarington. A workshop involving business sup port organizations was organized in late 2021 and included representation from CBOT, Orono BIA, Region of Durham and the Municipality’s own tourism staff. Page 27 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report CAO-005-22 2.4 Members of Council and senior staff were also interviewed by Deloitte to round-out the consultation efforts. Key Findings from Stakeholder Consultation 2.5 Some notable themes from the range of stakeholder consultations include: a) Clarington’s small-town, rural way of life is important to stakeholders. Stakeholders believe that the existing commercial cores and small local businesses must be developed into resilient and vibrant elements of the local economy. b) The expected arrival of the Ontario Power Generation headquarters will have a major economic impact on Clarington. This prompted some stakeholders to note that it will be important for the Municipality to ensure it is prepared to take advantage of the increased size and diversity of the population that will come with this development. c) The agriculture sector is understood to be dominated by a mix of a few large players and many small family farms. Even with Greenbelt regulations and policies in place, stakeholders are concerned that Clarington’s prime agricultural land may be absorbed by development. d) Stakeholders view the tourism and hospitality sector as a key component to attract outside visitor spending, new investment, and to ensure a high quality of place for existing and potential new residents. e) Infrastructure capacity was repeatedly mentioned as a constraint to development. This included reference to water, sewer, broadband, and public transportation – which can be key drivers underpinning economic growth. 3. Economic Development Strategy 3.1 The Municipality has a set of strengths that position it to be successful in its long-term economic development journey. These include things like strong population growth, low unemployment, and high participation in the labour force. There is also a sense of confidence and optimism about the future of the community, felt by residents and business owners alike. 3.2 Clarington’s expected positive rate of growth will assist existing small businesses in their post-COVID recovery, as the impact of the pandemic becomes more evident. The growth will also help support the attraction of new investments in retail, advanced manufacturing, hospitality, and health care services. The tourism, energy, and agri-food Page 28 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report CAO-005-22 processing sectors also provide strong prospects for future employment and investment opportunities in Clarington. 3.3 Revitalization of the four urban areas is also underway, which will provide an important backdrop for the creation of more leisure and recreational amenities, including outdoor gathering spaces, a vibrant arts and culture scene and the expansion of the Municipality’s trail network. Opportunities to improve transportation connections to the rest of Durham Region and the rest of the Greater Toronto Area will also assist in promoting the growth of residential and mixed-use development. 3.4 Despite the expected growth trajectory, there is a need to ensure that an appropriate balance be struck between the growth of the economy and a desire to balance that growth against the lifestyle qualities traditionally associated with a smaller urban community with rural charm. This will require that growth, and associated challenges, be addressed proactively. Major Catalysts for Growth and Development 3.5 The Municipality of Clarington has several notable catalyst projects/initiatives that can help shape the long-term economic success of the community. The following were identified, along with specific aspirational goals for some: 1) Ontario Power Generation Aspiration: Take a leadership role in the creation of a high-tech energy hub in Eastern Durham and ensure Clarington businesses are aware and competitive on OPG-procurement opportunities. 2) Courtice Waterfront and Energy Park Secondary Plan Aspiration: Provide a comprehensive vision and land -use framework to expedite the development of the Courtice waterfront. 3) Bowmanville West Urban Centre and Major Transit Station Area Secondary Plan Aspiration: (specific details listed within strategy) 4) Major Transit Station Areas Aspiration: (specific details listed within strategy) Page 29 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report CAO-005-22 5) Broadband Infrastructure Aspiration: Build an urban environment that supports a diversity of work options and the attraction of knowledge-based workers and employment opportunities while adding shovel-ready employment lands to the marketable inventory. 6) Goodyear Site and Bowmanville Hospital Development Aspiration: Facilitate the revitalization of downtown Bowmanville including the adaptive re-use of the vacant Goodyear brownfield site. Aspiration: Support the growth of the local medical community and the success of the recruitment initiatives related to Bowmanville Hospital’s expansion. 7) Canadian Tire Motorsport Park Aspiration: Collaborate with investors to develop a long-term vision for the expansion of Canadian Tire Motorsport Park. 8) Agricultural Diversification Aspiration: Ensure the long-term sustainability of agriculture in Clarington. 9) Tourism Aspiration: Position municipal amenities and staff efforts to support rural and urban tourism development that enhance the Municipality’s quality of place. Strategic Priorities, Objectives and Action Plan 3.6 The Economic Development Strategy notes three strategic priorities, and associated objectives. They are as follows: 1) Cultivate an Innovative Land-Use Framework Expand inventory of serviced employment land; Enhance policies and incentives; and Engage local businesses and regional partners. Page 30 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report CAO-005-22 2) Strengthen the Business Innovation Support Ecosystem Implement a formal business retention and expansion program; Enhance the development approvals process; and Align target sector opportunities with new growth areas. 3) Target High-Growth Businesses and Investment Develop an energy-sector value proposition; Implement proactive marketing; and Build economic development capacity. 3.7 Under each of the above listed objectives are a series of actions and tactics that provide direction through which the Municipality, and its identified partners and stakeholders, should undertake. Consideration is also given to timing and expected resource implications. Further, there are several suggested key performance indicators included as well as a section outlining the establishment of a performance measurement system. This portion of the Strategy will act as a guide for staff when preparing the eventual implementation plan. 4. Concurrence Not Applicable. 5. Next Steps 5.1 The Economic Development Strategy provides a framework of strategic priorities and an action plan with high-level tactics, but staff will need to work through each item and determine the feasibility of implementation (from both a financial and human capita l standpoint). It is recommended that the Strategy be adopted in principle, this will provide staff the ability to build a comprehensive implementation plan, including cost implications, which can be presented to Council for consideration as part of the 2023- 2026 Corporate Strategic Plan. 5.2 As part of the implementation plan, staff will evaluate the operational model and provide recommendations to Council to capitalize on the expected growth and the spin-off benefits of the nuclear energy sector, through a cluster strategy. Page 31 Municipality of Clarington Page 9 Report CAO-005-22 5.3 To not delay any of the important economic development work in Clarington, it is recommended that staff apply an economic development lens and allocate appropriate resources to ensure that the listed major catalysts projects are given appropriate attention and cultivation. 5.4 There are other ongoing projects designed to build the economic capacity of the Municipality, such as designing and developing a community profile, updating our Municipal website to include a full page on economic development, the ongoing preparation and updates to employment and commercial lands inventories, and facilitation of key development applications for job creation. 5.5 Staff need to be mindful of the Municipal needs as it relates to ensuring the Region of Durham’s Municipal Comprehensive Review process reflects Clarington needs for employment lands. 5.6 Staff recommends that the draft Strategy be adopted in principle to allow the new Council the opportunity to shape the community’s economic development priorities. To this end, staff will prepare an implementation report to be presented to Council as part of Council’s 2023-2026 Corporate Strategic Planning process in early 2023. Staff Contact: Carlos Salazar, Economic Development Officer, csalazar@clarington.net or Justin MacLean, Manager – Strategy, Intergovernmental Affairs and Transformation, jmaclean@clarington.net or Sarah Parish, Planner II, sparish@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 – Clarington Economic Development Strategy (draft) Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 32 Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy MDB Insight March 2022 Page 33 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page i Contents 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................1 Strategy Methodology ............................................................................................................... 3 2. Determining the Priorities .....................................................................................................8 Major Catalysts for Growth and Development ............................................................................ 9 3. Strategic Priorities................................................................................................................13 Objective 1.1: Expand servicing of employment land ................................................................ 19 Objective 1.2: Enhance policies and incentives ......................................................................... 20 Objective 1.3: Engage local businesses and regional partners ................................................... 22 Objective 2.1: Implement a formal business retention and expansion program ......................... 24 Objective 2.2: Enhance the development approvals process .................................................... 26 Objective 2.3: Align target sector opportunities with new growth areas .................................... 27 Objective 3.1: Develop energy-sector value proposition ........................................................... 29 Objective 3.2: Implement proactive marketing ......................................................................... 31 Objective 3.3: Build economic development capacity ............................................................... 33 4. Performance Measurement ................................................................................................35 Performance Metrics ............................................................................................................... 36 © 2022 Deloitte Canada Photo sources: Municipality of Clarington May 31, 2022 Page 34 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 1 1. Introduction Page 35 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 2 Introduction With an economy as integrated as that of the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA), edge municipalities like Clarington often take a back seat to the larger urban centres that provide more modern and efficient infrastructure, enhanced transportation connections and larger consumer and labour markets that serve to attract and sustain investment and talent. Often, these communities are left grappling with how to attract investment that reverses the outflow of talent each day, a lack of serviced employment land, a small business economy that lacks the capacity to expand or innovate their operations, or fewer educational, cultural and recreation opportunities when compared to larger urban areas. Clarington, however, finds itself on the cusp of a significant growth trajectory. With a current population of 102,415 and a workforce of 60,231, the municipality is growing faster than Durham Region and the province due in large part to its affordability, its blend of urban and rural living and accessibility to the city of Toronto. And while the local economy is currently dominated by small businesses and entrepreneurs, the recent announcement by Ontario Power Generation (OPG) to build a new headquarters in Clarington next to the existing Darlington Energy Complex is very positive. Bringing 2,000 OPG jobs to Clarington is likely to spur the growth of an energy employment cluster that will attract additional jobs to this area. The planned extension of the province’s GO transit network to south Courtice will also introduce further economic and employment opportunities to the community. Being deliberate and focused on the type of investment the municipality may want to see and the built form it supports is essential at this time to fostering a diversified economy and a liveable community. In this context, a strong relationship with the Region’s Planning and Economic Development Department is essential. Durham Region is better resourced, better positioned to market to investors, better able to support the needs of small businesses, and better able to negotiate on behalf of its municipal partners for economic development funding from upper levels of government and required shifts in the province’s land-use policy framework. This regional collaboration, done in conjunction with local planning and economic development efforts that include the advancement of investment-ready employment land and a focus on growing an energy cluster, can ensure new opportunities to the Municipality that might otherwise be unavailable. As the capacity for business development and investment attraction increases, consideration will also have to be given to the need for an effective economic development service delivery model that supports all aspects of the local economy. In preparing its first economic development strategy, the Municipality must reflect on the opportunities for cooperation and collaboration with all its economic development partners and be prepared to advance or contribute to those efforts in a way that will provide the greatest return and reward to the municipality. The Municipality of Clarington needs to reflect on the opportunities for cooperation and collaboration with all its economic development partners Page 36 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 3 Strategy Methodology Econo mic development strategic planning is the pro cess of defining where a community wants to go and creating a road map for how to get there. “Good economic development planning enhances urban competitiveness – that is the ability of a city to co mpete with other urban reg io ns natio nally and internationally, f or investment, talent, a nd local export markets 1.” In the case of Clarington’s first economic development strategy, this pro cess has been f ramed by the vision set o ut in the Municipality’s Corporate Strategic Plan and the Municipality’s Official Plan together with extensive research and analysis and input from the local stakeholders, the business community, and municipal staff. Figure 1: Strategy Development Process Clarington’s Strategic Priorities The Municipality of Clarington Council passed a series of Strategic Priorities and Goals that serve to inform the creation of an Economic Development Strategy. Corporate Strategic Priorities include: Engaged Communities Strong Economy Sustainable Infrastructure Growth Legacy Projects Environmental Sustainability 1 Dr. Larissa Muller, Economic Development Strategies: Best Practices, 2007 Strategy Formulaton Priorities, Objectives and Action Planning Implementation Considerations Stakeholder Engagement Business Interviews and Workshop External Stakeholder Interviews Online Survey SOARR Assessment Key Findings Report Market Analysis and Competitive Position Situational Analysis Benchmarking and Service Delivery Investment Readiness Council and Staff Interviews Clarington's Strategic Priorities Corporate Strategic Plan Official Plan Page 37 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 4 Specific to the creation of a strong economy the Municipality has set goals of: Completing the implementation of the Downtown Plans Creating partnerships in broadband expansion working towards 100 percent connectivity Expanding transportation networks into commercial and industrial areas Exploring an economic development strategy framework in collaboration with the business community and other stakeholders A further indication of the economic growth priorities for the municipality is the anticipated approval of the Courtice Transit-Oriented Community and GO Station Area Secondary Plan. Once approved, the Secondary Plan will guide the a rea’s growth as it transforms into a major employment, mixed-use, and transportation hub for Courtice. It is anticipated that the provision of municipal services and the creation of a GO station will be primary catalysts for this undeveloped area of the municipality. The Bowmanville East Urban Centre Secondary Plan Update will also shape the economic growth of Clarington. The secondary plan covers the historic downtown area, Lakeridge Health Bowmanville and the former Goodyear lands. This project area is expected to foster a walkable modern core for the community and accommodate new development and higher densities in the years to come. Market Analysis and Competitive Position With this broad economic vision in mind, the starting point for Clarington’s Economic Development Strategy was a comprehensive analysis of the local and broa der regional and provincial econom ies. This contributed to a Key Findings Report that assessed the Municipality’s recent economic performance against a select range of demographic and economic indicators combined with an analysis of relevant and emerg ing business and industry sector trends. Investment readiness was a key factor in this review. Consideration was given to a wide range of reports, studies, and strategic plans at the local and regional level that were seen as having a direct impact on the current and future economic development success of the municipality. In conjunction with this research, interviews were conducted with senior staff, members of Council and representatives from the Clarington Board of Trade to inform an understanding of the current service delivery model, levels of investment readiness and perceived gaps in economic development programming and services. The results of the research and preliminary consultation w ere used to inform subsequent discussions with the business community and external stakeholders about the opportunities and challenges facing the Municipality of Clarington in furthering its economic development agenda. A summary of findings is provided in Appendix A – Key Findings Report. Stakeholder Engagement Given the importance of securing community support for the Economic Development Strategy, a broad- based consultation process was essential. One-on-one interviews were conducted between November 2021 and January 2022 that included business leaders, key community stakeholders, economic development partners, entrepreneurs, elected officials, and staff from the Municipality of Clarington. These discussions provided f urther insight into trends related to the municipality’s key business and industry sectors, the current land use and policy framework, the extent of current economic development activities and the Municipality’s readiness to receive/attract investment. An electro nic Page 38 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 5 survey directed at both residents and the city’s business community was administered in cooperation with the Municipality of Clarington and the Clarington Board of Trade. Together with the background research, a Key Findings Report was prepared that provided an understanding of the municipality’s investment readiness along with the local strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and desired results that should be ascribed to an Economic Development Strategy for the Municipality. A summary of findings is provided in Appendix A-1: Key Findings Report. The graphic that follows provides a snapshot of select economic indicators. Strategy Formulation Clarington finds itself in a unique position as it relates the current service delivery model for economic development as it is the only community in Ontario that contracts economic development services to a local Board of Trade. Clarington Council has recently approved a two -year Purchase of Service Agreement that will have the Board of Trade providing business development and marketing activities on behalf of the municipality. This will allow the municipality to build internal capacity to support a broader range of economic development services and programming with a particular focus in the short term on improving the municipality’s investment readiness. The recommendations contained in the strategy reflect the current role and responsibilities of the Board of Trade and the level of cooperation and coordination that will be required over the next two years. The recommendations also reflect the organizational shift likely to occur in the later stages of the strategy’s implementation. The strategy is framed around a series of economic development priorities, the objectives or outcomes for each priority as informed by stakeholder input and related research. The action plan describes the appropriate steps or actions to be taken over the coming years to achieve the desired growth and development of the local economy and reflects the best practices in local economic development. It recognizes the Municipality will have to collaborate and coordinate with its partners to ensure the effective implementation of the plan. The municipality is ready for an economic development strategy that reflects the changes underway in the local economy and prioritizes the growth and expansion of its existing business community. Page 39 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 6 Page 40 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 7 Page 41 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 8 2. Determining the Priorities Page 42 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 9 Determining the Priorities Clarington has many strengths from which to chart its economic development agenda – strong population growth, a high participation rate among its labour force, and low unemployment. There is also considerable confidence in the future of the community, whether the sense of community perceived by residents or the positive relationship with the Municipality expressed by business owners. The positive rate of growth will help strengthen existing small businesses as the impact of COVID-19 becomes more evident, and support the attraction of new investments in retail, advanced manufacturing, hospitality, and health care services. The energy, tourism, and agri-food processing sectors also provide real prospects for future employment and investment in Clarington. Revitalization of the downtowns is underway, providing an important backdrop for more leisure and recreational amenities, outdoor gathering spaces, a vibrant arts and culture scene and the municipality’s urban trail network. Opportunities to improve transportation connections to the rest of Durham Region and the City of Toronto will also promote the growth of residential and mixed-use development. While Clarington looks to improve its urban infrastructure offering to support the g rowth of its economy, there is also a desire to balance this growth against the lifestyle qualities associated with a small urban community and rural vibrancy. There are risks to underestimating the importance of local economic development efforts to support this effort. Without addressing growth challenges proactively, the municipality may lose investment opportunities due to the lack of serviced employment land, increased reliance on skilled workers that commute from other jurisdictions, decreasing housing affordability and the continuing loss of prime agricultural land. Ensuring a timely and efficient development approvals process is also essential if the municipality is to capitalize on its near-term growth opportunities. Ultimately, the desired outcomes of a successful economic development strategy reflect a balance of community and business needs. For the Municipality of Clarington, this includes improvements to its infrastructure and higher satisfaction rate among local businesses, the marketing and promotion of the community and its value proposition, as well as an increase in greenfield development options for business and industry. It also includes lifestyle experiences that will appeal to both residents and visitors. Major Catalysts for Growth and Development The Municipality of Clarington has several large projects in various stages of development and completion that will shape the urban form of the community in the years to come and serve as major catalysts for economic growth in the community. The following section summarizes these initiatives and the aspirations for the local economy. Energy, tourism, and agri-food processing sectors provide tangible prospects for future employment and investment in the community Page 43 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 10 Ontario Power Generation The announcement by Ontario Power Generation 2 (OPG) that it is relocating its corporate headquarters to Clarington is a major boost in confidence for the projected growth of employment and investment in the municipality. More than 2,000 jobs are expected to move to the community from 15 existing offices across the Greater Toronto Area, Niagara, and Durham Region. OPG is actively expanding the Darlington site to accommodate a high-tech energy hub that will support innovation in nuclear technologies, including small modular reactors, and foster greater collaboration with its industry partners and supplier network. Aspiration: Take a leadership role in the creation of a high-tech energy hub in eastern Durham and ensure Clarington businesses are aware and competitive on OPG-related procurement opportunities. Courtice Waterfront and Energy Park Secondary Plan The Municipality’s Corporate Strategic Plan identifies the Courtice Waterfro nt and Energy Park Secondary Plan as a legacy project for the community. While the plan is intended in part to support the existing energy business cluster, it will also shape the future of south Courtice with a new residential neighbourhood and an extensive urban park along the waterfront. The 715-acre development of the Courtice waterfront will be central to leveraging the economic development opportunities provided by the new OPG headquarters, including the creation of a high-tech energy hub and the servicing of additional prestige employment lands. Aspiration: Provide a comprehensive vision and land-use framework to expedite the development of the Courtice waterfront. The Municipality initiated the Courtice Transit-Oriented C ommunity and GO Station Area Secondary Plan in 2019 for the lands at the south end of Courtice and north of Highway 401. These lands will include the future Courtice GO Station and comprise the surrounding Major Transit Station Area. Once complete, the Secondary Plan will guide the area’s growth as a major employment area for the community and a mixed-use and transportation for Courtice. The absence of sanitary sewers in south Courtice has been a major impediment to development and investment in this area o f the municipality. Bowmanville West Urban Centre and Major Transit Station Area Secondary Plan The Bowmanville West Urban Centre and Major Transit Station Area Secondary Plan is also being planned as the main concentration of new commercial and mixed-use development for the municipality. At build-out, it will comprise a diversity of housing, shopping and services with new open spaces and boulevards. The municipality intends to foster the creation of a walkable, vibrant neighbourhood that accommodates young families and older adults. Improved cycling infrastructure and pedestrian opportunities will connect the neighbourhood to the rest of the community. 2 Ontario Power Generation announcement, June 2019, opg.com Page 44 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 11 Major Transit Station Areas The Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs) in Bowmanville and Courtice have substantial development timelines that will remake these communities, and their related built form, particularly when GO Transit begins regular service. Durham Region’s Employment Lands Technical Report (completed as part of the Region’s Municipal Comprehensive Review, Land Needs Assessment process) projects an employment base that is forecast to reach 460,000 jobs region-wide by 2051 and a corresponding shortfall of 1,164 gross hectares (2,876 acres) of Urban Emplo yment Area land across Durham Region. Broadband Infrastructure Broadband infrastructure ensures the economy ha s the communications connectivity needed for the future. Expansion is expected to be completed in ten sites across Clarington, first with improvements by Bell. The municipality will work with other providers to fill gaps and improve cellular service. Aspiration: Build an urban environment that supports a diversity of work options and the attraction of knowledge-based workers and employment opportunities while adding shovel-ready employment lands to the marketable inventory. Goodyear Site and Bowmanville Hospital The Bowmanville East Urban Centre Secondary Plan includes the redevelopment of the vacant Goodyear Site. The Secondary Plan offers the opportunity for more than 800 new residential units, including a new mixed-use district with residential, commercial, and community uses and open spaces. The objectives of the redevelopment include improving connections to Bowmanville’s downtown and the nearby creek and the adaptive reuse of the Goodyear property as a commercial activity node and public open space in proximity to existing and planned residential neighbourhoods and the downtown. Aspiration: Facilitate the revitalization of downtown Bowmanville including the adaptive re-use of the vacant Goodyear brownfield site. The Secondary Plan Area also comprises the L akeridge Health Bowmanville Hospital. The facility is home to the Regional Eye Centre and is a full-service community hospital serving people across Durham Region. Redevelopment is underway that includes modernized facilities that will double the footprint of the current hospital. This provides the opportunity to grow the local medical community and support additional growth in the form of attracting small-scale medical and diagnostic laboratories as well as health care professionals. The Ontario Government confirmed its commitment to redeveloping Bowmanville Hospital, while the Municipality of Clarington has assigned $5 million towards the hospital’s expansion. Aspiration: Support the growth of the local medical community and the success of the recruitment initiatives related to Bowmanville Hospital’s expansion. Canadian Tire Motorsport Park Canadian Tire Motorsport Park has the potential to become a major event and hospitality asset in the community, having been positioned as the leading racing and automotive performance facility in the country with 500,000 visitors annually. It’s one of only three tracks in the world that has hosted Formula 1, Can-Am, and IndyCar events. The municipality is currently exploring a broad vision for the use and Page 45 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 12 development of the park that includes vehicle manufacturing research, automotive-related tourism investment, and expanding interest from tv and film production. Aspiration: Collaborate with investors to develop a long-term vision for the expansion of Canadian Tire Motorsport Park. Agricultural Diversification As with many parts of the province, the Region of Durham has shown considerable interest in facilitating on-farm diversified uses to support the ongoing sustainability of farming and introduce young entrepreneurs to the business and investment opportunities in the region’s rural areas. This shift in thinking also supports the growth of local agritourism opportunities, which helps build a stronger rural economy. With such a large rural component to the community, the Municipality can support this trend through its zoning controls, educating residents on the perceptions of the quality of place that this activity can foster, and more effective marketing efforts that showcase local success stories. Aspiration: Ensure the long-term sustainability of agriculture in Clarington. Tourism Building on the rural economy opportunities afforded Clarington, there is a rich collection of local festivals and events that provide colour and vitality to residents’ quality of life. Among them are Maple Fest and the Orono Fair. The municipality wishes to provide a more enabling environment for both rural and urban activities and amenities to thrive , particularly given the projected growth of the local population growth. Investment in waterfront parks, an expanded trails network, and Sports Tourism could support the growth of local tourism products and services. The municipality’s arenas, sports and recreation facilities, as well as recreation and tourism staff have a major role to play in boosting sports tourism. Aspiration: Position municipal amenities and staff efforts to support rural and urban tourism development that enhance the Municipality’s quality of place. Page 46 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 13 3. Strategic Priorities Page 47 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 14 Strategic Priorities Analysis and observations compiled in the development of the Municipality of Clarington’s Economic Development Strategy inform the development of the first strategic priority: Cultivate an innovative land-use framework. Much of the municipality’s economic growth potential is centred on providing an increased amount of serviced employment land and the approval of several key secondary plans. It is also important that Clarington create an urban environment and built form that will continue to attract the businesses and skilled workforce needed to support the planned population and employment growth. By laying the groundwork now, being bold in the vision for the community and enhancing the municipality’s overall business environment, Clarington can take full advantage of the development potential, large and small, urban, or rural, as well as emerging and future investment attraction that supports the community’s emerging value proposition. This foundational direction is fortified by the second strategic priority: Strengthen the business innovation support ecosystem. While the municipality is actively engaging its business community through its partnership with the Clarington Board of Trade , more can be done to better understand and respond to the needs of businesses, including addressing the long -term impact of COVID-19 and the opportunities to support new entrepreneurial growth and business investment. The first step in this effort is a formal Business Retention + Expansion (BR+E) program that addresses the ongoing needs and challenges of the municipality’s key sectors of opportunity. By gathering and supplementing this critical business intelligence, the Municipality can develop and adapt its programs and services to facilitate individual development expansions and ensure a business -centric focus for the community. Concurrently, the Municipality must be intentional about its third strategic priority: Target high-growth businesses and investment. Clarington must work more closely with Durham Region to understand the regional target sectors and the development a regional high-tech energy hub. Aligning o ther industries (advanced manufacturing, agri-tech, professional and scientific, etc.) with energy should be considered for an investment attraction effort focused on supply chain gaps. In tandem with attracting investment, Clarington can also help connect local businesses with the procurement opportunities of the nuclear energy cluster. By putting the talent, targets, and tactics in place to create an optimized economic development effort, Clarington will maximize its resources, implement initiatives more appropriately, and share the story of the community to a receptive investment audience. Clarington can claim its role as a central player in the broader landscape of energy investments and work with partners to build the assets needed. The Figure on the next page outlines the objectives under each strategic priority. By putting the talent, targets, and tactics in place to create an optimized economic development effort, Clarington will maximize its resources, implement initiatives more appropriately, and share the story of the community to a receptive investment audience Page 48 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 15 Economic Development Objectives To each Strategic Priority, a logical sequence of objectives is built out, which provides a framework for the Action Plan. •Expand inventory of serviced employment land •Enhance policies and incentives •Engage local businesses & regional partners CULTIVATE an innovative land-use framework •Implement a formal business retention & expansion program •Enhance the development approvals process •Align target sector opportunities with new growth areas STRENGTHEN the business innovation support ecosystem •Develop a energy-sector value proposition •Implement proactive marketing •Build economic development capacity TARGET high-growth businesses and investment Page 49 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 16 Action Plan Page 50 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 17 Action Plan The Economic Development Strategy for the Municipality of Clarington is an evolving document for the community as it assists in shaping the local economy in the years to come. The successful implementation of the Economic Development Strategy will need the support and cooperation of organizations, companies and individuals (as outlined in Roles and Responsibilities) working in tandem with Municipality of Clarington staff to ensure a strong and vibrant community over the long term. Understanding the Action Plan Actions and Tactics The Actions and Tactics column outlines the directions the Municipality, its partners, and its stakeholders will undertake to address the essential issues or opportunities that should be addressed over the length of the Strategy. Timing The Economic Development Strategy assumes a five-year timeframe to address the priorities and objectives set out in Action Plan. Priority timings are: S = Short term (1 year) M = Medium-term (2 to 4 years) L = Long term (5+ years) It is assumed that the Municipality of Clarington will reassess the Strategy’s progress after five years to consider the effectiveness of the recommendations, adjust priorities based on current conditions as necessary, and add new actions in response to changing market conditions and policy considerations. Resource Implications The Action Plan provides a range of resource implications: None = No expected resource implications $ = Minor operational budget increase $$ = Major operational or minor capital budget increase $$$ = Major capital budget increase Definitive budget costing must be prepared by the municipality for any future actions and tactics. Page 51 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 18 Roles and Responsibilities The Roles and Responsibilities column identifies select leads and internal/external partners that can support economic development objectives. The following table lists the acronyms used in the Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy and their respective descriptions. Acronyms Description BIAs Business Improvement Areas BACD Business Advisory Centre Durham (Small Business Advisory Centre) CBOT Clarington Board of Trade DEDP Durham Economic Development Partnership DFFMA Durham Farm Fresh Marketing Association DRAAC Durham Region Agricultural Advisory Committee DRAR Durham Region Association of Realtors DRFA Durham Region Federation of Agriculture DRPED Durham Region Planning and Economic Development DRW Durham Region Works Department DWA Durham Workforce Authority EDAC Economic Development Association of Canada EDCO Economic Developers’ Association of Ontario LH Lakeridge Health MCC Municipality of Clarington Council MCFS Municipality of Clarington Financial Services Department MCPD Municipality of Clarington Planning and Development Services MCST Municipality of Clarington Community Services (Tourism) OMAFRA Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs OMEDT Ontario Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade OMMAH Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing MUSH Municipalities (Other), Universities, School Boards, and Hospitals NDCC Newcastle and District Chamber of Commerce OCE Ontario Centres of Excellence OPG Ontario Power Generation RIC Research Innovation Commercialization Centre SC Statistics Canada TG Toronto Global Page 52 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 19 Objective 1.1: Expand servicing of employment land # Actions and Tactics Roles and Responsibilities Timing Resource Implications 1.1.1 Advocate for a minimum five-year supply of shovel-ready industrial land is available, on the market, and in a range of lot sizes for adequate market choice. Lead: MCPD Partners: DRPED, DRW, CBOT L $$$ 1.1.2 Advocate for increased water/sewer and electrical servicing capacity for industrial and commercial land inventories to accommodate future employment growth. Lead: MCPD Partners: DRPED, DRW, CMOT L $S 1.1.3 Collaborate with commercial real estate representatives to update the available land inventory regularly. Lead: CBOT Partners: DRAR, MCPD M None 1.1.4 Connect the available land inventory to the municipality’s GIS system to facilitate inquiries about all property parcels. Lead: MCPD Partners: DRPED, DRW, CBOT M None 1.1.5 Share the available land inventory on the economic development website with permission from landowners and/or agents. Lead: CBOT Partners: MC PD, DRPED, DRAR M $ 1.1.6 Work with communications providers to fill broadband gaps and improve cell service with attention to existing and planned employment lands. Lead: MCPD Partners: DRPED, CBOT M $ Key Performance Indicators Area of shovel-ready industrial land available and on market Meetings with owners and representatives of industrial land Launch on online database of available properties Increased physical infrastructure installations and user connections to broadband internet in employment lands Page 53 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 20 Objective 1.2: Enhance policies and incentives # Actions and Tactics Roles and Responsibilities Timing Resource Implications 1.2.1 Mo dernize Zoning By-Laws so they are flexible enough to allow desired development in the community’s growth areas. Lead: MCPD Partners: DRPED M $ 1.2.2 Expedite the approval and development of the Courtice Waterfront and Energy Park Secondary Plan. Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED M $ 1.2.3 Update municipal land-use policies to ensure farm operators and agri-businesses can easily understand the options available to them and expedite their business plans. Lead: MC PD Partners: DRAAC, DRPED, MMAH S $ 1.2.4 Update Community Improvement Plans (CIP) incentives to be responsive to the needs of priority property owners, and to be complementary to the new Regional CIP. Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED, CBOT, MMAH M $ 1.2.5 Fund and promote the Clarington CIP incentives to the degree that property owners are motivated to apply. Lead: MC PD Partner: MCFS M $$ 1.2.6 Add parcel-specific land-use information to the municipality’s public GIS system to inform prospective developers. Lead: MCPD Partners: CBOT M None 1.2.7 Communicate policy changes and provide ongoing education about land use to business organizations and potential developers, including the creation of an investors tool kit. (See Objective 3.2) Lead: MC PD Partners: CBOT, DRPED M None Key Performance Indicators Regular updates to land-use policies and Zoning By-Laws Expedited approval of modernized, proactive agriculture diversification policies Budget available for CIP incentives Multiplier effect of private-sector investment in CIP programs Page 54 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 21 Page 55 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 22 Objective 1.3: Engage local businesses and regional partners # Actions and Tactics Roles and Responsibilities Timing Resource Implications 1.3.1 Establish a Corporate Calling Program with performance measurement targets on outreach, visits, and engagement activities Lead: CBOT Partners: BIAs, MDPD, NDCC, BACD S None 1.3.2 Establish a Clarington Economic Development Advisory Committee to support the implementation of the Economic Development Strategy. Lead: MC PD Partners: CBOT, DRPED, MCST M $ 1.3.3 Collaborate to enable the positioning of the downtowns and rural areas as destinations for residents and visitors. Lead: MC ST Partners: BIAs, MCPD, BACD, CBOT, DEDP, OCE, OMAFRA S $ 1.3.4 Explore supply chain prospects and build local capacity to respond by helping local businesses become competitive on OPG- related procurement opportunities. Co-Leads: MCPD / CBOT Partners: OPG, OCE, RIC, DRPED M $ 1.3.5 Develop a local business ambassador program with industry leaders who can meet potential investors during site-selection visits and/or to whom site selectors can be confidentially referred for positive testimonials about Clarington. Lead: MC BOT Partners: BIAs, MCPD S None 1.3.6 Meet bi-annually with local business representatives to share major initiatives and provide a discussion forum for general concerns (e.g., Mayor’s breakfast meeting). Lead: CBOT Partners: MCPD, Mayor, CAO S $ 1.3.7 Educate elected representatives and community groups about the importance of economic development efforts. Lead: CBOT Partner: MCPD S None 1.3.8 Leverage existing workforce collaborations among Durham’s post-secondary institutions and private-sector employers. Lead: DWA Partners: MUSH, MCED, DRPED, CBOT M None Page 56 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 23 Key Performance Indicators Business satisfaction rate (survey) Annual monitoring report (proposed Economic Development Advisory Committee) Number of local businesses involved in Business Ambassador Program Number of meetings with groups of local businesses and community groups Page 57 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 24 Objective 2.1: Implement a formal business retention and expansion program # Actions and Tactics Roles and Responsibilities Timing Resource Implications 2.1.1 Coordinate an active Business Retention and Expansion (BR+E) Program, assisted by the deployment of a Client Relationship Management (CRM) system to capture local business intelligence, track employer-specific obstacles and opportunities. Lead: CBOT Partners: MCPD, DRPED S $ 2.1.2 Collaborate on the annual regional Business Count program to update Clarington’s business directory. Lead: DRPED Partners: MC PD, CBOT S None 2.1.3 Provide support and referrals to assist, advise, and mentor start-ups and existing small businesses and business associations. Lead: BACD Partners: MC PD, OCE, RIC, MEDT, DRPED, CBOT S None 2.1.4 Report key findings systematically and annually to drive policy needs. Leads: CBOT Partners: MCPD, DRPED S None 2.1.5 Host target sector-specific (see Technical Report) workshops to identify opportunities and challenges for business growth and investment in Clarington. Lead: CBOT Partners: MCPD, target business sectors M None 2.1.6 Work with the agriculture sector to provide targeted support to develop policies and incentives for on-farm diversification, agri- business, agri-tourism, and agri-tech. Lead: MCPD Partners: CBOT, MCST, DRAAC, DFFMA, DRFC, OMAFRA M $ 2.1.7 Collaborate on the implementation of Durham Region’s Local Food Business Retention and Expansion Strategy Action Plan. Lead: DRPED Partners: CBOT, DFFMA, DRFA, OMAFRA, MCPD M $ 2.1.8 Monitor and evaluate the community’s track record on liaising with existing investors. Lead: CBOT Partners: MCPD M None Page 58 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 25 Key Performance Indicators Establishment of CRM system Number of visits made in Corporate Calling Program Number of new start-ups (Sources: Business Advisory Centre Durham, Regional Business Count) Satisfaction rate of business and investors Page 59 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 26 Objective 2.2: Enhance the development approvals process # Actions and Tactics Roles and Responsibilities Timing Resource Implications 2.2.1 Design criteria for a customized permit processing program to prioritize non-residential development applications (commercial, industrial, agricultural) and expedite permitting processes through a Clarington Development Concierge. Lead: MC PD Partner: CBOT, DRPED M None 2.2.2 Publish a flow chart or dashboard outlining the steps and timeframes associated with local land- use planning and development approvals. Lead: MCPD Partners: DRPED, CBOT S None 2.2.3 Establish regular information-sharing sessions between municipal planning staff and economic development staff . Lead: CBOT Partners: DRPED, MC PD S None 2.2.4 Ensure the land-use planning approvals process is included in municipal customer-service quality assurance audits . Lead: MCST Partner: MCPD, MCED M None Key Performance Indicators Establishment of Clarington Development Concierge (e.g., Halton Region Employment Land Concierge, Chatham-Kent Concierge Service, Ajax Priority PATH) Business Satisfaction Rate Number of cross-regulatory round table meetings Number of information-sharing meetings Page 60 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 27 Objective 2.3: Align target sector opportunities with new growth areas # Actions Roles and Responsibilities Timing Resource Implications 2.3.1 Act as trusted advisors to businesses and investors on commercial and industrial development and redevelopment transactions. Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED, CBOT M None 2.3.2 Continually evaluate commercial office needs, opportunities and models for mixed-use development, particularly in the municipality’s new growth areas. Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED M None 2.3.3 Facilitate renewed downtown revitalization plans for urban core areas in cooperation with regional planning and place-making efforts for Major Transit Station Areas. Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED, CBOT, OMAFRA M $$ 2.3.4 Support talent recruitment initiatives related to Lakeridge Health Bowmanville Hospital’s expansion. Lead: LH Partners: MC PD, CBOT M $ 2.3.5 Explore opportunities to connect to the proposed Durham Meadoway signature destination initiative. Lead: DRPED Partners: MCST, MCPD L $ 2.3.6 Collaborate with developers on diversifying the potential of Canadian Tire Motorsport Park (CTMP), e.g., vehicle manufacturing research and automotive -related tourism development. Lead: CBOT Partners: CTMP, MCST, MCPD, DRPED L None 2.3.7 Undertake a feasibility study to support the redevelopment of the Goodyear brownfield site. Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED, TG L $ 2.3.8 Position municipal amenities and related programming to support resident attraction and Sports Tourism development. Lead: MCST Partners: MC PD, DRPED, CBOT M $ Page 61 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 28 Key Performance Indicators Creation of Downtown Revitalization Plans (public -sector investment and vision) Hirings at Bowmanville Hospital Expansion of Durham Meadoway Development approvals at Canadian Tire Motorsport Park Attraction of complementary uses to Goodyear site Develop business plans for municipal sports facilities to accommodate Sports Tourism Page 62 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 29 Objective 3.1: Develop energy-sector value proposition # Actions and Tactics Roles and Responsibilities Timing Resource Implications 3.1.1 Understand and maximize the unique value proposition of the Municipality’s target industry sectors: Nuclear energy and related engineering, technical, and environmental sectors Knowledge-based employment that would settle near Major Transit Station Areas and broader community amenities Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED, CBOT M None 3.1.2 Convene an advisory working group to support the creation of a high-tech energy hub in Clarington and to explore new best practices for a cluster-focused high-tech energy hub in North America. Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED, OPG, CBOT S None 3.1.3 Align the distinctive advantages of specific employment zones to opportunities related to transportation links, waterfront development, and downtown revitalization. Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED L None 3.1.4 Support the creation of an inventory of Clarington’s tourism and cultural assets: cultural and recreational amenities, music, art, food, breweries, and more. Lead: MC ST Partners: MC PD, CBOT M $ 3.1.5 Align the Municipality of Clarington economic development branding within Durham Region’s “Clean Energy Capital of Canada” promotion to leverage collaboration, resources, and expertise. Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED, MCST, CBOT M $ 3.1.6 Develop an investment attraction marketing plan identifying specific targets, tactics, channels, timelines, messages, and tracking . Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED, CBOT, MCST M $ 3.1.7 Development of lead generation system for intake of investment inquiries . Lead: MC PD Partners: DRPED, TG, CBOT S $ Page 63 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 30 Key Performance Indicators Business and resident awareness rates of Clarington’s value proposition and brand Launch of investment attraction strategy and related performance measures Number of active leads in lead generation system Page 64 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 31 Objective 3.2: Implement proactive marketing # Actions and Tactics Roles and Responsibilities Timing Resource Implications 3.2.1 Develop a Clarington brand and consistent messaging platforms, implementing economic development communications tools (e.g., standalone economic development website, social media, print materials, etc.) to attract investors, following best practices in concept, presentation, and engagement. Lead: MC PD Partners: MCST, DRPED, CBOT M $$ 3.2.2 Ensure Clarington’s economic development communications efforts are fully leveraging all local, regional, provincial, national, and international collaborations opportunities. Co-Leads: MCST, MC PD Partners: DRPED, OMEDT , CBOT M None 3.2.3 Explore the be nefits of joining or increased collaboration with other regional marketing alliances, such as Ontario East Economic Development, Ontario Food Cluster, RTO6, etc. Lead: MC PD Partners: MC ST, CBOT, DRPED, EDCO S $ 3.2.4 Develop a library of success stories, images, video s, and messages to support promotional campaigns. Lead: MC ST Partners: MC PD, DRPED, CBOT M $ 3.2.5 Monitor effectiveness of marketing and communications tools. Co-Leads: MC PD, MCST Partners: DRPED, CBOT M None 3.2.6 Ensure economic development personnel respond in a substantive way to inquiries within the same workday as they are received. Lead: CBOT Partners: MCPD, DRPED, CBOT S None Page 65 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 32 Key Performance Indicators Number of images, video, stories, and messages in an organized content library for use in marketing and promotional tools Development of website and tracking of traffic Development of social media platforms and tracking of reach and engagement Publication of online and printed Community Profile (a.k.a. Investors’ Tool Kit) and other marketing collateral, and tracking of distribution/reach Volume of investment inquiries received Files opened for potential investments and developments Page 66 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 33 Objective 3.3: Build economic development capacity # Actions and Tactics Roles and Responsibilities Timing Resource Implications 3.3.1 Assess options for an economic development service delivery model and recommended structure (e.g., status quo, full service in-house, arms-length economic development corporation). Lead: MCC S $ 3.3.2 Provide core economic development services with an organizational business plan that aligns with Durham Region’s Planning and Economic Development Department Business Plan. Lead: MCPD Partners: DRPED, CBOT S $ 3.3.3 Increase per-capita funding for municipal economic development to remain competitive with other communities in terms of investment readiness and programming . Lead: MCPD Partners: DRPED S $$ 3.3.4 Ensure core economic development staff are trained and certified economic development (Ec.D.) professionals and participate in professional development. Lead: MCPD Partners: CBOT, EDCO, EDAC M $ 3.3.5 Maintain and regularly update datasets of reliable community economic indicators tailored to respond to investor inquiries, published in the Community Profile and on website pages, and shared with partners. Lead: MCPD Partners: DRPED, SC, OMEDT S $ 3.3.6 Ensure any municipal staff or contractor dealing with planning and economic development issues are aware of current policies and site-selection protocols. Lead: MCPD Partners: CBOT, BIAs, Building Inspectors, Customer Service staff M None Page 67 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 34 # Actions and Tactics Roles and Responsibilities Timing Resource Implications 3.3.7 Publish an up-to -date and easy-to-navigate economic development webpage on the Clarington website or separate economic development website for potential investors to reach Economic Development staff. (Related to Action 3.2.1) Lead: MC PD Partners: CBOT, MCST, DRPED M $ Key Performance Indicators Increased Economic Development Budget per Capita compared to other municipalities Trained Ec.D. professional(s) on staff Published community economic statistics Launch of stand-alone economic development website Page 68 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 35 4. Performance Measurement Page 69 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 36 Performance Measurement It is recommended that the Municipality of Cla rington create mechanisms within its Economic Development Strategy to monitor progress annually, preferably in advance of the yearly budget review process. Whether the municipality chooses to operate its program in-house, or contract it to an arms- length organization, effective performance measurement is a basic expectation in the professional economic development community. A key element of monitoring progress on implementation is the identification of performance metrics that offer an evidence -based assessment of the outcomes and impact of the strategic actions. Performance metrics provide a consistent framework to evaluate the following: Did we achieve what we set out to do? Did our efforts have the desired impact? Are we closer to achieving our strategic goals because of these efforts? Performance Metrics Increased citizen demands for government accountability drive the use of performance measures in local government. Greater interest on the part of elected representatives in performance-related information to assist in program evaluation and resource allocation decisions is aimed at making governments more oriented toward results. Performance metrics allow for an evaluation of tactics and strategies that support efficient and effective planning and resource allocation. They are diagnostic tools that focus on energy, attention, and effort. They may also help to support a municipality’s commitment to accountability and transparency. The Municipality of Clarington should carefully construct a performance measurement system that includes detailed and appropriate metrics for each strategic priority developed. This could be structured to utilize existing measures and the creation of other metrics to effectively measure new initiatives. A monitoring report shared during an annual strategy evaluation would be the principal means of reporting back to Council, the proposed new Economic Development Advisory Committee, and the community on economic development performance measures. A system that feeds directly into the Department’s business plan is also recommended to ensure there is consistency between the strategic planning framework and day-to-day goals and tactics. Performance measurement is a diagnostic tool that focuses on energy, attention, and effort. It also helps to support a municipality’s commitment to accountability and transparency. Page 70 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 37 Basic Metr ics A basic performance metric could be a statement grounded in an internal, informal assessment of a project’s progress. As part of the monitoring report, the outcome could be measured as a percentage of progress towards an action being completed. Example: Update of New Economic Development Website: 80% complete Another basic example is the use of a table containing all strategies and actions, scored using colours or icons. A green circle may indicate the action is complete or nearing completion. A purple triangle or question mark could mean there are obstacles or resource issues. A red square or octagon could mean the action has stalled. A brief notes section could provide details. Figure 2: Example of Monitoring Report for Economic Development Strategy Action Score/Status Notes 1. Update the Economic Development Website Launch scheduled for spring 2. Create a Tourism SnapChat Account Under review by IT 3. Develop an Affordable Housing CIP Incentive Not approved by Council Complex Metrics Municipalities can use more sophisticated tools for corporate performance measurement. These tools come in various forms and will require much more staff time to coordinate a reporting structure. The World C ouncil for Cities Data (WCCD) Global Cities Registry provides the highest standard of community performance monitoring in the form of ISO certification. Figure 3: Sample Performance Measurement from the World Council for Cities Data portal Page 71 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 38 In this example (Figure 3), Yellowknife is highlighted with 8,351 businesses per 100,000 population. If Clarington were also included, it could be showcased as the third-largest municipality for this indicator, given that Clarington has approximately 6,950 businesses per 100,000 population. There may be many other economic development indicators provided by the WCCD model which Clarington may utilize to compare its strengths within the context of international performance measurement. Page 72 MDB Insight – Municipality of Clarington Economic Development Strategy Page 39 Page 73 The Corporation of the City of Cambridge Corporate Services Department Clerk’s Division The City of Cambridge 50 Dickson Street, P.O. Box 669 Cambridge ON N1R 5W8 Tel: (519) 740-4680 ext. 4585 mantond@cambridge.ca May 18, 2022 Re: Motion: Councillor Hamilton re: Request to the Region of Waterloo to Consider Free Public Transportation on Election Days At the Special Council Meeting of May 18, 2022, the Council of the Corporation of the City of Cambridge passed the following Motion: WHEREAS there has been an overall and consistent decline in voter turnout for municipal, provincial, and federal elections in Canada and in Waterloo Region, despite the act of voting being essential to the proper functioning of the democratic process; WHEREAS many residents struggle to access transportation to polling stations on election days, due to a lack of transportation available, physical mobility or accessibility issues, and/or socioeconomic status; WHEREAS any initiative to boost attention and incentives to vote on election days warrants attention and exploration in order to assist the democratic process and increase voter turnout; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT correspondence be sent to the Region of Waterloo on behalf of Cambridge Council to request free public transportation on election day for the Municipal and School Board Election, as well as for the Provincial, and Federal Election days, so as to generate more attention about elections and polling station locations, and to encourage and make it possible for more residents to vote, that would otherwise be unable to access their polling stations. Page 74 Should you have any questions related to the approved resolution, please contact me. Yours Truly, Danielle Manton City Clerk Cc: (via email) Hon. Premier Ford Association of Municipalities of Ontario City of Cambridge Council Page 75 NEWCASTLE COMMUNITY HALL BOARD April 19 2022 Main Hall 7 pm Present Were: Henry Corvers Crystal Yaki Marg Zwart, Local Councilor Sierd DeJong Janeen Calder Barry Carmichael Regrets From: Granville Anderson, Regional Councilor Also Present: Gabrielle Bell, Secretary Pat Thexton 1. AGENDA Moved by H. Corvers, seconded by M. Zwart The agenda is accepted as circulated with the following additions: 1. Lions BBQ 2. Historical Society 3. Canadian Concert Band 4. Vacation “Carried” 2. Garden Committee Pat Thexton presented plan to rejuvenate gardens for 2022 season. This will include removal of plantings, adding of items that do not require as much maintenance. As we no longer have the Newcastle Horticulture Society to maintain the gardens it is imperative that gardens are brought to point that does not require as much labour. Moved by H. Corvers, seconded by M. Zwart That garden plan is accepted as presented. “Carried” Moved by H. Corvers, seconded by M. Zwart That $2000.00 is allocated to the plan to rejuvenate the gardens. “Carried” 3. MINUTES Moved by H. Corvers, seconded by S. DeJong The minutes of March 15 2022 are accepted as circulated. “Carried” Page 76 4. BUSINESS ARISING a) Discussed the communication from Chair of Village Concert Committee, L. Johnson. It was agreed that G. Bell would join committee as treasurer and B. Carmichael would be liaison between Committee and Hall Board. Moved by M. Zwart, seconded by J. Calder That Village Concert 2022 season would be chaired by L. Johnson. “Carried” b) M. Zwart presented information on option of renting dishwasher which would include parts and labour for $110.00. Board agreed rental would be best option at this time. B. Carmichael will coordinate with company to set up lease, he will make sure we are not locked in and that it is our best interests to move forward. c) G. Bell reported Hotel California fees have increased by approximately $500.00. Recommended we reduce number of tickets sold and increase pricing. Moved by H. Corvers, seconded by M. Zwart Hotel California be hired for May 12 2023 concert. Tickets will be limited to 275 at a cost of $45.00 includes HST. “Carried” d) Discussed 2022 fundraiser, some suggestions were Comedy Night, Greek Night, Sunday Brunch. J. Calder will report at May meeting feasibility of doing Comedy Night. B. Carmichael will contact Durham College Culinary Program to investigate participation in Brunch. e) Board members were in agreement that the rubber bands on the clock chime have reduced the level considerably and board discussed this concern. M. Zwart will contact Dan Hooper for invoicing of this temporary noise reduction that is currently installed. f) Maintenance Work Plan – C. Yaki reported first monthly walk around with T. Welsh, Facility Supervisor and S. Fogg has been completed. It was informative and a few items have pointed out such as monthly checking of exit signs and defibrillator. If anyone is interested in doing this walk around they can be scheduled. g) G. Bell reported that she has followed up with R. Groen, Supervisor of Buildings and Properties on roof project. It has been delayed to June 13. This will be completed within 2 weeks. R. Groen has indicated these repairs should alleviate some of the water damage we have been experiencing in the lower level. h) G. Bell reported she has been working with Municipality to improve the insurance portal for clients to be more conducive to our rentals as opposed to a sports facility. Meeting was held on Feb 11 2022 with L. Reck, V. Bilenduke-Guppy and C. Hodgson 5. FINANCIAL REPORT Moved by H. Corvers, seconded by M. Zwart The financial report is accepted as presented. “Carried” a) It was noted that main hall rentals have exceeded budget expectations for 2022 b) We have been approved by CRA for Tourism and Hospitality Recovery Program that started October 2021. We have received the November payment of $3156.72 towards payroll for Page 77 this time frame. We will apply for remainder of 2021 and into 2022 if we continue to qualify. 6. CORRESPONDENCE a) Soper Valley Model Train Association has requested reduced rental rate for Main Hall to host shows in spring and fall. Referred back to staff. b) Touch of Glass and Linens have requested their company be preferred rental company for a 4% return on all rentals. Board agreed we would not authorize preferred or accept percentage of rentals from vendors. We will offer advertising of their business on our website for a fee. c) Lions Club has requested refund of May 15 BBQ as they have been unable to sell tickets. Board was in agreement as this is still after effects of CoVid. d) Historical Society has requested permission to put frosting on windows facing front of building and possible removal of blinds. Board agreed this request would be denied, all agreed windows should be uniform as they are presently with matching blinds. e) Canadian Concert Band has cancelled rental for preferred rental rate at Gift of Art. 7. 100th Building Committee Update a) Committee requesting Newcastle Hall Board purchase Tourism post cards through the Tourism Department at Municipality to advertise the 100th. Cost to us would be $200.00; Municipality will contribute $200.00 as well. Cards will be distributed through Tourism offices. b) Committee requesting that 2023 Spring Concert hosted by Newcastle Hall Board funds be contributed to 100th Celebration. Board agreed at this time we can’t commit these dollars to Committee, this can be re-evaluated at a later date. Moved by J. Calder, seconded by S. DeJong Approval to purchase post cards advertising Newcastle Community Hall at a cost of $200.00 through Tourism Department. “Carried” 8. In Camera Moved by C. Yaki, seconded by S. DeJong That meeting go in camera. “Carried” Moved by C. Yaki, seconded by S. DeJong That meeting come out of camera. “Carried” 9. NEW BUSINESS a) Chair trolley has been loaned to us by St Francis of Assisi Church to consider for storing our chairs in main hall. Trolley will be left for S. Fogg to try and report back if this is something we could use. b) Mobility Outlet/Charging Station – tabled to May meeting. c) G. Bell will be on vacation from May 3 – May 14 2022. Motion to adjourn by J. Calder at 9:45 pm “Carried” Page 78 MEMO The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1C 3A6 1-800-563-1195 | Local: 905-623-3379 | info@clarington.net | www.clarington.net If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee From: Stephen Brake, Director of Public Works Date: June 6, 2022 Memo #: Memo-029-22 Re: Clarington Cricket Pitch At the General Government Committee meeting held on Monday January 10, 2022, Council approved Resolution #GG-007-22, that directed staff to: Coordinate the development of an agreement with one of the School Boards in Courtice to establish a Cricket Pitch overlay on one of their existing sports fields; Work with Mr. Yasi Majid and Dr. Naveed Tariq on the establishment of a Cricket Pitch overlay on the previously identified Municipal soccer field at Rickard Neighbourhood Park in Newcastle; and Advise all interested parties listed in Report PWD-001-22 and any delegations of Council’s decision. In response to the direction provided, staff contacted the interested parties on their preferred location for the pitch and Courtice was their choice given the proximity of users. Both the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board (KPRDSB) and the Peterborough Victoria Northumberland and Clarington Catholic District School Board (PVNCCDSB) were contacted to review candidate locations in Courtice, and it was determined that the most suitable location for the Cricket Pitch Overlay would be on the Holy Trinity Catholic Secondary School sports field and that use of a portable mat for the pitch portion of the cricket area would be an acceptable surface that wouldn’t damage or change the intended use of the sports field. The Municipality currently has an agreement with the PVNCCSB for Municipal programming at their facilities during the summer season and the Cricket Pitch will form part of this agreement. The PVNCCSB requested that the Cricket group provide a schedule for their coordination. Staff researched portable Cricket Pitch products and storage options for the mats and sourced a roll up mat with trolley, that will work on a grass field, and a small, refurbished sea container to store the mat on site when not in use. Page 79 Page 2 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1C 3A6 1-800-563-1195 | Local: 905-623-3379 | info@clarington.net | www.clarington.net The cost of acquiring these items will be approximately $12,000 plus taxes and shipping and given that the Cricket group is a fledgling organization they do not have the financial resources to acquire these items. Public Works is respectfully recommending that approval be provided to proceed with the acquisition of the portable mat, and storage container with the necessary funding to be drawn from an account at the discretion of Deputy CAO / Treasurer to a maximum of $15,000. Regards Stephen Brake Director Public Works Department /AJ cc: Yasir Majid Naveed Tariq Page 80 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING RESOLUTION # DATE: June 6, 2022 MOVED BY Councillor Zwart SECONDED BY Councillor Whereas the four Newcastle “service club” main signs are in need of replacement; And whereas the main part of the sign is municipally-owned, but the individual service club signs are the responsibility of each service club; And whereas the replacements were not part of the Claringotn 2022 budget; And whereas the Council of the Municipality of Clarington wishes to present Newcastle at its best; Now therefore be it resolved that Staff be authorized to replace, in 2022, the four municipally-owned Newcastle “service club” main signs at an approximate total cost of $15,000 to be funded from the Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund account. Page 81 Page 82 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING RESOLUTION # DATE: June 6, 2022 MOVED BY Councillor Zwart SECONDED BY Councillor Whereas the Waterfront Trail is very well used by pedestrians; And whereas the Waterfront Trail is also well used by cyclists, and now e-bikes, travelling at a higher rate of speed than pedestrians; And whereas the addition of signs on multi-use paths has been shown to improve safety in other municipalities; And whereas Staff are generally in support of the addition of signs such as “Slow down – 15km max”; “Walk Right – Pass Left”; “Bikes give way to Pedestrians”; “Share the Trail”; “Caution – popular section ahead”, but the design of a comprehensive sign plan and purchase of such signage is not included in the 2022 budget and Staff resources are dedicated to other projects; And whereas Staff have estimated the cost to be between $15,000 - $20,000 for the design and execution; Now therefore be it resolved that Staff be authorized to engage a consultant to provide a comprehensive sign plan and purchase signage for the multi-use path on the Clarington Waterfront Trail to a maximum of $20,000, to be funded from the Tax Rate Stabilization Fund. Page 83 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: June 6, 2022 Report Number: CSD-012-22 Submitted By: George Acorn, Director of Community Services Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: File Number: Resolution#: Report Subject: Diversity in Clarington – 2022 Update on Diversity Initiatives and Clarington’s Diversity Advisory Committee Recommendation: 1. That Report CSD-012-22, and any related delegations or communication items, be received for information. Page 84 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report CSD-012-22 Report Overview This report provides an overview of the work of Clarington’s Diversity Advisory Committee (CDAC), as well as initiatives that staff are undertaking to support Diversity and Inclusion in the Municipality and the workplace. CDAC was formed in 2018 and strives towards a safe, welcoming, and inclusive Clarington by raising awareness and celebrating our community’s differences, abilities, and strengths. 2022 saw the completion of the Committee’s third full year of operation. Internally, many diversity and inclusion initiatives have been offered to staff through the work of Clarington’s Diversity and Inclusion Staff Team (DIST). DIST continues to review internal policies to identify gaps or areas that need to be reviewed and strengthened. DIST extends the reach of diversity and inclusion across our corporation through employee-driven initiatives that increase the competence of our staff and influence well-informed decision- making. 1. Background 1.1 Diversity and Inclusion efforts are coordinated through Clarington’s Diversity Advisory Committee, its Anti-Black Racism Subcommittee, and Clarington’s Diversity and Inclusion Staff Team, for both the community and the corporation. 1.2 All groups meet monthly and while in-person meetings were restricted again this year due to COVID-19, they were able to conduct meetings and events using virtual platforms (Microsoft Teams and Zoom). The Committees will continue to do so until it is safe to return to in-person meetings and events. 1.3 Each group developed work plans that outlined their goals and strategies for their success over the past year. Many of their accomplishments are included in this report. Clarington Diversity Advisory Committee (CDAC) 1.4 The Clarington Diversity Advisory Committee (CDAC) is a resident committee that acts as an advisory body for Council. Its mandate is to provide advice, comments, and recommendations on issues affecting diversity in our community, foster awareness, reduce barriers, promote inclusion, and engage our residents. 1.5 The Committee is structured with staggered terms to ensure continuity of their work. Four of the members will have served their four-year terms which are set to expire on December 31, 2022. Members each bring their own lived experiences and community connections. They share their perspectives on issues and opportunities helping to promote diversity in Clarington. Page 85 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report CSD-012-22 Clarington Anti-Black Racism Subcommittee (CABRSC) 1.6 The CABRSC, a liaison between the community and the CDAC, was formed in August 2020 as a commitment to break down walls and eliminate racism in the community. CABRSC’s focus is on developing strategies to address anti-Black racism and other forms of discrimination in our community. This is accomplished through education and awareness by recommending policies, initiatives, and guidance on matters related to racism to the CDAC. 1.7 The CABRSC includes two members of the Diversity Advisory Committee (one of whom acts as Subcommittee Co-Chair), Council Liaison Councillor Ron Hooper, a representative from Clarington Public Library, Clarington residents and is supported by the Staff Liaison. Clarington Diversity and Inclusion Staff Team (DIST) 1.8 The Diversity and Inclusion Staff Team (DIST) was formed in 2020 and is comprised of members of various departments from across the corporation. These members act as ambassadors of the various diversity initiatives that are implemented for our staff team. 1.9 Their purpose is to extend the reach of diversity and inclusion across our corporation through employee-driven initiatives with a goal of increasing the competence of our staff and influencing well-informed decision making. 2. Community Initiatives to Support Diversity and Inclusion Partnerships and Collaboration 2.1 The CDAC and CABRSC collaborated with other levels of government and local organizations to discuss ways to further diversity and inclusion in our community. Speakers from various groups were invited to share presentations about initiatives that were related to the work of the CDAC / CABRSC and discussions were had about partnership and collaboration. 2.2 These groups included Lakeridge Health’s Inclusion, Disability, Equity and Accessibility (IDEA) Focus Groups, the Region of Durham – Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Unit, Durham Regional Police Services and the Peterborough Victoria Northumberland and Clarington Catholic District School Board. Plans include further connection with Bowmanville Rotary Club and the Carion Fenn Foundation. Durham Regional Police Services Community Safety Council 2.3 In 2021, Durham Regional Police Services (DRPS) launched a new Community Safety Advisory Council to provide a foundation for improving service delivery and promote Page 86 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report CSD-012-22 effective planning, policy, and decision-making that meets the needs of the communities served by DRPS. 2.4 The CDAC supported this new Council through participating in the member selection process and currently two representatives (one CDAC and one CABRSC) sit as members of the Council. Inclusive Spaces Policy 2.5 Staff worked with CDAC and CABRSC to create the Inclusive Spaces Policy CSD-006- 22 that sets out clear expectations for those using and visiting our buildings, that racism and discrimination will not be tolerated. This Policy was approved by Council through Resolution #GG-161-21. 2.6 To support this work, it was also recommended that the Municipality of Clarington request to join the Coalition of Inclusive Municipalities. The Coalition of Inclusive Municipalities, coordinated by the Canadian Commission for UNESCO, is a network of more than 80 municipalities across Canada. The intent is to improve policies against racism, discrimination, exclusion, and intolerance. Through collaboration and sharing of experiences by the members, the coalition undertakes initiatives to eliminate all forms of discrimination to build more inclusive and welcoming communities. The request to join is in progress. Recognitions and Celebrations 2.7 Throughout 2021 and into 2022, recognition continues in a variety of ways for days and months of significance and celebration of diversity. A comprehensive social media plan was developed to highlight and recognize these dates. 2.8 In addition to the social media plan, activities were planned for both the community and our staff team. These activities aimed to recognize and provide education around the various days including Indigenous History Month, National Indigenous Peoples Day, Pride Month, and Black History Month. Clarington recognized and celebrated the first- ever National Day for Truth and Reconciliation. 2.9 In recognition of Black History Month in February 2022, Clarington’s Diversity Advisory Committee partnered with Clarington Public Library to offer a virtual screening of the movie “Icebreakers”. The film followed the journey of a “promising teen hockey star (Josh Crooks) in a sport where Black players like him are chronically underrepresented”. The event included a discussion with the local athlete, Zechariah Thomas, who is also an elite hockey player. Zechariah candidly shared his experience of racism throughout his hockey career. Further discussions will be had to support our local organizations as they address racism in sports. Page 87 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report CSD-012-22 Language Translation Services 2.10 In 2021, as identified in the Accessibility Update, the Municipality launched a language translation service. The service supports American Sign Language (ASL) and more than 240 languages. Staff can access the translation service for in-person support through a toll-free number or video-on-demand app, or access a conference feature to support phone inquiries, ensuring we are able to provide accessible customer service. 2.11 Other than voice services, document translation support, ESL support for a child in recreation programs, and American Sign Language interpretation are all available. Staff used the ASL interpretation during a province-wide virtual event, of which Clarington was a partner. Municipal Anti-Hate Symposium 2.12 In 2021, the Municipality of Clarington partnered with the Cities of London, Oshawa, Hamilton, and Kingston and the Regional Municipality of Durham to offer a full-day virtual event - “Municipal Anti-Hate Symposium: Towards a Collective Approach to Understanding and Dismantling Hate”. The symposium was created from discussions between municipalities about hate and hate activity in communities . 2.13 The symposium was free and open to municipal staff, leadership, and elected officials. The symposium focussed on how hate, discrimination, and oppression affect different groups within our communities. Expert speakers presented on topics such as challenging hate in local communities, hate mitigation and prevention, and confronting various forms of racism and hate. Over 250 people from across Ontario participated throughout the day and plans are underway for a similar event in 2022. 3. Staff Initiatives to Support Diversity and Inclusion Pronouns and Inclusive Language 3.1 The DIST was asked by Senior Leadership to recommend a corporate position on the use of pronouns in different applications. This practice is becoming more commonplace within other municipalities and workplaces across Ontario. Encouraging the use of pronouns in various settings in the workplace (i.e., email signature, forms, when introducing/greeting each other) helps to create a safe, welcoming, and inclusive environment by accommodating the wide spectrum of gender identities and forms of expression. 3.2 A working group researched best practices regarding the use of pronouns. This group consulted with local organizations: PFLAG Canada Durham Region and Durham Alliance Outreach, both of which are 2SLGBTQ support agencies in Durham, for guidance on how to implement the use of pronouns within the Corporation. Page 88 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report CSD-012-22 3.3 A recommendation was made to launch the use of pronouns. Staff and Council can optionally, include their pronouns in their email signature, using a specified template. To support this launch, information and resource sheets were created and Gender Diversity training was offered to provide an opportunity for learning as to why this initiative is so important. 3.4 To further support the pronoun implementation, and to promote inclusion broadly, an Inclusive Language Manual has been adopted from the City of Oshawa. This resource addresses inclusive language for gender and 2SLGBTQ, and other dimensions of diversity such as race, age, ability, and more. This manual will be introduced to staff in 2022. Inclusive Hiring 3.5 In 2021, the Municipality received a grant from the Canadian Parks and Recreation Association (CPRA) to support a job placement for youth who experience barriers to employment. Through the CPRA Youth Employment Experience grant, we received $10,568.54 for a summer camp position to support a youth with a disability in accessing meaningful employment. Leveraging our relationships with the Abilities Centre and Participation House, we were able to find excellent candidates for the opportunity of Inclusion Counsellor Assistant. Clarington’s story was featured in a CPRA article, which highlighted our success at the National level. 3.6 The Municipality of Clarington was successful in receiving funding through this program for 2022 as well and will be hiring two more summer positions focussing on youth who may face barriers to employment. One position is in Community Services, the second will be placed in Public Works. Truth and Reconciliation Staff Committee 3.7 A Truth and Reconciliation Staff Committee (TRSC) was formed to examine the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s 94 Calls to Action. Along with consultation, the purpose is to identify recommendations the Municipality could undertake to move forward with reconciliation. This committee is made up of staff who engage with our Indigenous communities, and who work in areas that could support the various themes identified in the Calls to Action. 3.8 The Committee began work in October 2021 and has engaged in research and learning, while making connections, planning, and preparing requests to consult with our Indigenous communities. 3.9 The TRSC will continue consultation with our Indigenous communities , to ensure their rights and interests are included in any recommended strategy or action plan. This will be an ongoing process of learning and rebuilding relationships. The staff committee will Page 89 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report CSD-012-22 provide Council with incremental updates on ongoing work and seek Council approval when decisions are needed. Leading Equitable and Accessible Delivery (LEAD) 3.10 In Fall 2020, the Abilities Centre in Whitby offered the Municipality of Clarington the opportunity to participate in the LEAD process. The Abilities Centre is a national LEAD facilitator and has worked with organizations across Canada. The Municipality of Clarington embraced the process as the first government entity to participate in this initiative. 3.11 The LEAD project in Clarington began in Spring 2021. A LEAD Working Group was formed, which included representatives from the Diversity and Inclusion Staff Team, Senior Leadership Team, Council Liaisons to the Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) and Diversity Advisory Committee (DAC), and two community representatives – both who are members of the AAC and DAC. 3.12 The LEAD Working Group was guided through a facilitation process to identify focus areas, support a rationale for the work that we are doing, and develop action items to support the work plan. The facilitation process took a close look at the nine themes of the LEAD toolkit. These are Leadership, Structure, Governance, Strategy, Financial Management, Supplier-Partnership Management, People Management, Program and Service Delivery, and Facility and Technology Supports. 3.13 The result of this work is an Improvement Plan. The Improvement Plan identifies a guiding principle related to each of the nine themes. There are recommended projects to support the principle, with outcomes and supporting action items that will help us to reach success in each of these themes. 3.14 Information about LEAD and a summary of the Improvement Plan recommendations were shared with Council in Report CSD-003-22. CCDI membership 3.15 The Municipality of Clarington continued its relationship as an Employer Partner with the Canadian Centre for Diversity and Inclusion (CCDI). This membership demonstrates our commitment to promoting diversity and inclusion and has provided staff and Council with access to a variety of resources and opportunities to support their learning, understanding, and growth. 3.16 Throughout 2021, we saw an upward trend of employee engagement with this partnership. Learning opportunities included topics such as inclusive leadership, Black Lives Matter in the workplace, anti-Asian racism, religious inclusion, land Page 90 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report CSD-012-22 acknowledgement, gender expression and pronoun importance, addressing micro - aggressions and ageism at work. 4. Future Direction 4.1 Throughout 2022, the CDAC, the CABRSC, and the DIST will continue to implement their workplan goals. All groups will continue to seek out funding opportunities to supplement the operating budget to support diversity initiatives and training. This will also support opportunities to collaborate with current and new partners to ensure Clarington is welcoming, supportive, and inclusive to all. 5. Concurrence 5.1 Not Applicable. 6. Conclusion 6.1 It is respectfully recommended that the report on the update of the diversity and inclusion activities in Clarington be received for information. While there has been significant work completed in 2021, much work remains to be done, to achieve the goal of an inclusive community. Staff, with the support of Clarington’s Diversity Advisory Committee, Anti-Black Racism Subcommittee and the Diversity and Inclusion Staff Team, are confident we will see many accomplishments over the next few years. Staff Contact: Lee-Ann Reck, Manager, Client Services 905-623-3379 ext. 2508 or lreck@clarington.net. Attachments: Not Applicable Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 91 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: June 6, 2022 Report Number: LGS-010-22 Submitted By: Rob Maciver, Director of Legislative Services Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: File Number: L1000-56 Resolution#: C-116-22 Report Subject: Durham Region Electric Kick Scooter By-law Recommendation: 1. That Report LGS-010-22, and any related delegations or communication items, be received for information. Page 92 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report LGS-010-22 Report Overview This report provides a synopsis of the new Region of Durham Electric Kick Scooter By-law, with specific reference to concerns raised by Clarington Council at the May 2, 2022 Council meeting. 1. Background 1.1 On May 2, 2022, Council adopted Resolution #C-116-22, which provides: That Staff report back on the Electric Kick Scooters referenced in the Durham of Region report (Durham Region Report 2022-COW -9) and corresponding by-law. 1.2 On April 27, 2022, the Region of Durham enacted its Electric Kick Scooter By-law (the “By-law”). 1.3 The By-law is authorized under the Provincial e-scooter pilot program which allows municipalities to choose where and how e-scooters may be used within their jurisdiction. 2. Analysis 2.1 As stated above, the By-law is enacted pursuant to the Provincial e-scooter pilot program which runs until the end of 2024. The By-law provides that it will be repealed on the earlier of November 27, 2024, and the date the pilot program is rescinded by the Provincial government. If the pilot project is successful, it is possible that changes will be made to the Highway Traffic Act to permanently authorize the use of electric kick scooters. 2.2 The By-law applies exclusively to electric kick scooters (“e-scooters”) which are defined as vehicles having two wheels (one wheel in front of the other), a platform for standing, a steering handlebar, and an electric motor. The By-law does not apply four-wheeled mobility scooters which are placed in the same category as electric wheelchairs. 2.3 The By-law applies to individually owned e-scooters as well as to e-scooters that are rented to the public. Although e-scooter rental services are beginning to appear in some of the larger municipalities in Ontario, none are thought to be operating in Durham Region at this time. 2.4 The By-law provides that the maximum speed of an e-scooter is 24 kilometres per hour. 2.5 The By-law authorizes the use of e-scooters on roads under the jurisdiction of the Region of Durham only. E-scooters are not permitted to operate on roads under the jurisdiction of Clarington. Page 93 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report LGS-010-22 2.6 The By-law restricts the use of electric kick scooters to Regional roads with a legal speed limit of 60 km/hr or less, unless it is within a reserved bicycle lane. 2.7 Additionally, the By-law provides that e-scooters are not permitted to operate on a sidewalk, except in very limited circumstances. 2.8 The By-law includes a variety of other rules and restrictions including: a minimum age requirement of 16; a requirement for riders under 18 to wear a helmet; and a prohibition against tandem riding. 2.9 Council raised a concern about the potential for e-scooters to be parked in the street or sidewalk where they could obstruct pedestrians and traffic. To avoid this, the By-law provides that e-scooters are not permitted to be parked or stopped anywhere other than designated parking areas. 2.10 The full version of the Region’s By-law may be reviewed here. 3. Concurrence Not Applicable. Staff Contact: Robert Maciver, Deputy CAO/Solicitor, 905-623-3379 ext. 2013 or rmaciver@clarington.net. Attachments: Not Applicable Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 94 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: May 9, 2022 Report Number: LGS-012-22 Submitted By: Rob Maciver, Deputy CAO/Solicitor Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution#: File Number: By-law Number: Report Subject: Cemetery By-law Review and Update Recommendations: 1. That Report LGS-012-22, and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That the By-law attached to Report LGS-012-22, as Attachment 1, to repeal the current Cemetery By-law and replace it with the attached new Cemetery By-law, be approved; 3. That Staff be authorized to provide notice, and signage, regarding the proposed new Cemetery By-law, in accordance with Regulations of the Funeral, Burials and Cremation Services Act, 2002; 4. That the By-law attached to Report LGS-012-22, as Attachment 2, to amend Clarington’s Fee By-law, to add a schedule for the Cemetery Price List, be approved; and 5. That all interested parties, and any delegations, be advised of Council’s decision. Page 95 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report LGS-012-22 Report Overview This Report provides a thorough review and proposes a replacement by-law to the current Cemetery By-law, including moving the Price List from the Cemetery By-law to the Fee By- law. 1. Background 1.1 Every operator of a cemetery must have a set of by-laws, approved by the Registrar, that are in compliance with the FBCSA and O. Reg. 30/11 and 184/12, are in the public interest, and do not give the cemetery operator or supplier an unreasonable or unfair advantage over another supplier, and relate to the current functioning of the cemetery. 1.2 Clarington has had a “cemetery by-law”, in one form or another since 1960. 1.3 Arising out of Report OPD-007-12, Council passed By-law 2012-061, Clarington’s current Cemetery By-law. At the time, the review was prompted by changes to the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002. 1.4 Since 2012, the Cemetery By-law has been amended seven times. 1.5 In addition to the 33 abandoned cemeteries, Clarington manages five active cemeteries (Bowmanville, Bond Head, St. George’s, Hampton Union, and Orono), with Hampton (2013) and Orono (2020) being recent acquisitions. 1.6 The cemetery business is managed jointly between the Clerk’s Division Staff (from an administrative, interments/sales/transfers side) and the Public Works Department (from the hands-on burial side) and is a partnership that has worked well for dozens of years. 1.7 As the industry and our community evolves, Staff felt it necessary to revie w the by-law to ensure that it addresses practices and rules for the smooth operation of Clarington’s cemeteries. To that end, Clerk’s Division Staff and the Public Works Department have met several times to review all aspects of the Cemetery By-law. 2. Definition of Infant Graves 2.1 The current Cemetery By-law includes the following definition: “Baby Land” means a part of a cemetery designated for infants with a grave no bigger than 24” x 36” (61 cm X 91.5 cm). 2.2 Over the years, Staff have received some comments that this definition can be disturbing to those who have recently lost an infant. Page 96 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report LGS-012-22 2.3 Staff have surveyed other cemeteries to determine a more appropriate name for the area and recommend changing the definition to “Infant Baby Land” and the block will be known as “IBL”. Additionally, the size needs to be corrected to match the price list (1.5’ x 3’). 2.4 Public Works staff will look at replacing the current monument/sign, which currently says “Baby Land”, with a graphic sign instead of the name at the Bowmanville Cemetery. The cost for this change will also be included in the 2023 budget. 3. Limitations and Permissions Limit of 12 Graves Per Person 3.1 Arising out of Report OPD-003-20, Council amended the Cemetery By-law to add subsection 4.6 as follows: “That the sale of Interment Rights shall be limited to a maximum of 12 lots/graves to each individual.” 3.2 This maximum number of lots/graves was recommended to support the existing cemetery layout plan and also help to ensure that space in Clarington’s Cemeteries will continue to be available to all members of the public for generations to come. Since the by-law amendment was made, Staff have been concerned that the change does not support the industry standard of “in-filling” of the sales of graves and the public may be misled to think that they can purchase large plots together. 3.3 Additionally, Staff have been concerned that 12 niches might be purchased by a single individual and may not be required for many years. This would limit the public’s ability to purchase the limited number of niches available. 3.4 To that end, Staff are recommending that the grave limit be changed from 12 to 6 graves per person, including niches, and further that six niches cannot be continuous (in a row), effective for any future purchases. NOTE: This doesn’t prevent one person purchasing graves/niches up to the max, and another person in the same family purchasing more. It will not prevent families from getting plots together, but we will ensure that they are in the names of the people who intend to use them. This will discourage overconsumption of burial rights that result in a later re -sale. Ashes Scattered in Graves 3.5 Section 7.7 of the current Cemetery By-law states: “No person shall scatter cremated remains on any Grave.” Page 97 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report LGS-012-22 3.6 There have been requests to scatter human cremated remains within (not atop) an existing grave. The current Cemetery By-law is silent on this matter and Staff have held the opinion that human cremated remains should be contained in a vessel in case they need to be moved. The scattering of human cremated remains does not dissipate into the soil and remains visible for a long period of time. Additionally, the remains will be disturbed during maintenance and there are health concerns with staff possibly breathing in the remains. 3.7 Staff are recommending that Subsection 7.7 be changed to also prohibit the scattering of human cremated remains either atop or within a grave. Niche Occupancy 3.8 We currently have two different prices for the single niche and the double niche (despite the niches being the same size and having the ability to hold two urns). We do not offer a lower price when purchasers wish to place two urns in a regular plot. 3.9 Therefore, for consistency, Staff are recommending that there be no distinction between single or double niches – and only the one price (the current price for a double niche) for any niches sold after the effectivity date of the new cemetery by-law. 3.10 For clarity, the purchase of a niche is a separate cost from the opening of a niche to insert an urn. Decorations 3.11 Section 10.1 of the current Cemetery By-law states: “The Cemetery Operator reserves the right to regulate the articles placed on Lots or Plots that: pose a threat to the safety of all Interment Rights Holders, visitors to the Cemetery, and Cemetery employees; prevents the Cemetery Operator from performing general cemetery operations; or are not in keeping with the respect and dignity of the Cemetery. Prohibited articles will be removed and disposed of without notification.” 3.12 There are further sections regulating flowers and shrubs. 3.13 However, the Cemetery By-law is silent on trinkets/mementos placed on niches and columbariums. For example, people will use artificial flowers to hold up a necklace or a small chain. When the artificial flowers are worn, and weathered, it is hard to remove since that is what is holding up the necklace/chain but we don’t want to throw those out since they can seem as if they are somewhat sentimental. Page 98 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report LGS-012-22 3.14 Additionally, there are instances of placements of flowers and pots at the base of the columbarium. Staff are recommending adding a prohibition to these for columbariums. 3.15 In the future, niches will be built without a vase, but there will be a central location to place flowers for the columbarium, to avoid this problem. 3.16 Additionally, the current by-law is also silent on items that aren’t necessarily a threat, but might be inappropriate, such as alcohol containers or discretiona ry items (i.e. mouldy stuffed animals). The current by-law contains the following wording “Prohibited articles will be removed and disposed of without notification” which, in general, Staff wish to see remain in the by-law. Although, new wording surrounding inappropriate items is recommended as well as changing “Prohibited items will be removed” to “Items will be removed”. 3.17 Therefore, Staff are recommending that “niches and columbariums” be added to the above section. W ording has been added to prohibit people from hanging items from the niche and they should not impede any other niche. For clarity, columbarium decorations should be no more than 4” in any direction from the opening of the holder and the groundskeeper reserves the right to determine if decorat ions are acceptable. 3.18 Although the above is straightforward, the prohibition poses some problems with definitions of “articles” and enforcement. Since there have been many years of tradition among existing grave owners that need to be balanced. To balance expectations, Staff are recommending a “go forward” approach where no personal objects will be allowed in the Bowmanville Cemetery for sections DD and beyond (i.e. new sections) and no personal objects to be allowed on newly constructed columbariums. In order to not disturb current traditions, this will be a go forward approach in new sections only (i.e. Sections A, D, and G in the Orono Cemetery). 4. Sale and Transfer of Interment Rights Care and Maintenance Fund 4.1 Subsection 4.1 of the current Cemetery By-law states: “Subject to availability of Lots, Interment Rights may be purchased from the Municipality at the rates set out in Schedule A. The rates for Interment Rights include the portion specified by the Act for deposit to the Cemetery’s Care and Maintenance Fund.” Page 99 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report LGS-012-22 4.2 Prior to 1955, graves were purchased without the “care and maintenance” fee. Additionally, for the Hampton and Orono cemeteries – prior to Clarington taking over these cemeteries, purchasers have been charged the “care and maintenance” fee at the time of purchase. 4.3 To address this, Staff are recommending adding the following wording “except for transactions with a grave (i.e. transfer, interment or installation of a marker/monument) that was purchased previously and included the “care and maintenance” at the time of purchase.” 5. Clarifications Interment Without Payment 5.1 Section 2.6 and 2.7 of the current Cemetery By-law state that: “No interment shall be made on a Statutory holiday without payment of an extra charge as set forth in Schedule “A”, save and except in the case of a written order of the Medical Officer of Health and in such case the extra charge, set out in Section 5 of Schedule A, shall not apply. No Interment shall be made on a Saturday or Sunday without payment of an extra charge as set forth in Schedule “A”, save and except in the case of a written order of a Medical Officer of Health and in such case the extra charge shall not apply.” 5.2 In reality, in order to provide good customer service, an interment can take place when an agreement has been arranged with a Funeral Home Operator, i.e. an out-of-town Funeral Home Operator will attend the opening and hand in the cheque at that time. 5.3 Additionally, these two sections were meant to convey that there would be an extra payment for Statutory Holiday or Saturday/Sunday interments. The only exception to the extra fee was if it was ordered by the Medical Officer of Health for those days. 5.4 Public Works Staff are working on Saturdays and the current Price List states “no charge” for Saturday niche interments. This wording is misleading so Staff are recommending that the wording be changed to “no additional charge” (other than the regular interment fee) for Saturdays in the fee schedule. The “Saturday Plot Interment” charge will still remain as the work requires a second person who isn’t normally working Saturdays. Page 100 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report LGS-012-22 5.5 In order to further clarify this in the by-law, Staff recommend changing these sections to be: “No interment shall be made on a Statutory Holiday, or Sunday, without payment of an extra charge as set forth in the Fee By-law. This extra charge is not applicable when there is a written order, from a Medical Officer of Health, for interment.” Memorial Services 5.6 Section 2.8 of the current Cemetery By-law states: “Before any memorial service is held in the Cemetery, the Cemetery Operator shall be given at least 10 days notice in writing, together with a satisfactory undertaking that the cost of repairing any damage which may be occasioned, will be paid.” 5.7 The 10 days notice is obsolete, and some memorial services may occur without any notification to the Municipality and may be smaller gatherings. Additionally, any service that results in damages due to large attendance or other causes (i.e., large trucks, motorcycles), will be cost recoverable. 5.8 Staff recommend that the above section be changed to, “Memorial Services greater than 75 people shall require advance notice to the Cemetery Operator.” Shrubs & Trees 5.9 Subsection 3.1(b) and Subsection 9.3 contradict Subsection 10.4 of the current Cemetery By-law regarding the planting of shrubs and flowers. Subsection 3.1 was meant to refer to the Municipality planting new trees and shrubs throughout the cemetery (e.g. ash tree replacement). Subsections 9.3 and 10.4 were to provide permission to the rights holders to add plants not exceeding a garden size of 12”. 5.10 Staff recommend Subsection 9.3 be changed to only include the planting of flower beds (i.e. trees and shrubs are not allowed, and add that any other live plants are allowed but they are not to exceed 12”.) Disinterments 5.11 Subsections 3.3 and 3.4 of the current Cemetery By-law states: “Unless otherwise directed by the Medical Officer of the Department of Health, no human remains may be disinterred from the Grave without written consent of the Interment Rights Holder. Page 101 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report LGS-012-22 No disinterment or removal of any casketed human remains shall be allowed except under the supervision and direction of the Medical Officer of the Department of Health and in the presence of the Cemetery Operator, and upon due observance of all other requirements of the Act and regulations.” 5.12 The industry has changed the Medical Officer of Health is no longer present, the funeral home operator is present. 5.13 Section 102.1 of the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, states that the Court, the Attorney General, the Solicitor General, or the Coroner may order a disinterment. 5.14 Staff recommend that the words, in the second paragraph, “under the supervision and direction of the Medical Officer of the Department of Health” be changed to “as ordered by those defined in the Act”, including a similar change to the first paragraph. Limits on Full Casket Burials and Cremations 5.15 Sections 7.8 to 7.10 of the current Cemetery By-law state: “Due to the instability of the soil, the top of any interment container shall be 36” (91.5 cm) below ground surface for safety reasons. Regardless of the manner in which the Grave is prepared only one fully Human Remains is to be interred in any single Lot. For those purchasing Lots or Plots prior to the enactment of this By-law, double interments will be honoured, but no more than two interments shall be allowed in one Lot. Both Interments in one Lot must each have Caskets. Cremated remains shall be allowed to be interred with fully Human Remains. The limit shall be three (3) cremated remains with one (1) fully Human Remains in any single Lot. For those Lots purchased prior to the enactment of By-law 2005-067 requesting a double interment in one Lot, the limit shall be two (2) cremated remains with two (2) full Human Remains in any single Lot.” 5.16 Although repealed by By-law 2005-067, By-law 89-219 amended the By-law 79-04, the Cemetery By-law, as follows: “Not more than two casket burials shall be allowed in one lot. Up to six ash burials at single depth will be permitted in a vacant lot or a lot occupied by a single or double casket burial. A burial initially used for ash burial may not later be used for casket burials.” 5.17 The reasoning behind the more recent limits had to do with concerns about too many monuments and the instability of the ground. Page 102 Municipality of Clarington Page 9 Report LGS-012-22 5.18 With the recent acquisitions of other cemeteries, the wording of “prior to enactment of this by-law” (which used to refer to the Bowmanville cemetery only) no longer applies. Additionally, there needs to be clarity on the “grandfathering”. 5.19 Staff are recommending the existing wording be replaced with the following: “Due to the instability of the soil, the top of any interment container shall be 36” (91.5 cm) below the ground surface for safety reasons. Regardless of the manner in which the Grave is prepared, only one full-body human remains is to be interred in any single Lot. Human cremated remains shall be allowed to be interred with full-body human remains. The limit shall be three cremated remains with one full-body human remains in any single Lot or, four cremated remains if there is no full-body human remains. Notwithstanding Subsection XX[above], if the lot is being used for both full-body burials and cremated remains, full-body burials must be in place prior to placing cremated remains in any single lot. Notwithstanding Subsection XX [above], for those who purchased Lots or Plots: In the Bowmanville Cemetery prior to July 1, 2005, requesting a double interment in one Lot, the limit shall be two cremated remains with two full Human Remains in any single Lot; In the Orono Cemetery prior to June 1, 2019, six cremations will be permitted with the approval of the Cemetery Operator; In the Hampton Cemetery, six cremations will be permitted in all graves (as all graves were sold prior to Clarington assuming the cemetery). Markers 5.20 “Markers” are defined as “any permanent memorial structure that is set flush and level with the ground, and used to mark the location of a burial lot.” The current Price List for markers are: Description 2022 Rate (excluding taxes) Monument foundation (flat fee) $454.71 Flat Marker Foundations (flat fee) 285.52 Cremation / Baby Markers (flat fee) 126.90 Removal of Monuments 89.88 Page 103 Municipality of Clarington Page 10 Report LGS-012-22 The difference in price is due to the different sizes of markers, however, this distinction is not made clear in the by-law. Therefore, Staff are recommending clarification wording and a change to the Price List. 5.21 Staff recommend that the description of flat markers include the maximum size in the fee schedule, by grave type. Additionally, a new item be added, “foot marker” (no care & maintenance) with a maximum size included, at the same cost as the flat markers for Block IBL. 5.22 Staff also recommend that the costs be determined by grave type, as shown below: Monument Foundation or Marker Setting Type Grave Type Maximum Size Care & Maintenance Flat Fee Price HST Total Monument Regular Height: 4 ft See body of By-law for details on size $200.00 $454.71 $85.11 $739.82 Flat Marker Regular 24 ½” x 18 ½” $100.00 $285.52 $50.12 $435.64 Cremation 22” x 16” $100.00 $126.90 $29.50 $256.40 Block IBL 16 ½” x 10 ½” N/A $126.90 $16.50 $143.40 Foot Marker All 16” x 10” N/A $126.90 $16.50 $143.40 Removal of Monuments All N/A N/A $89.88 $11.68 $101.56 6. Monuments Assisted Burials 6.1 “Assisted Burials” are commonly known as “Social Services burials” and occur when the deceased’s estate is unable to cover the cost of burial and Social Services pays for the grave and interment. This is legislated and allows for the provision of financial assistance for funerals and burials to ensure that individuals who are in receipt of social assistance, indigent persons, and persons in financial need may have their remains interred or cremated in a respectful and dignified manner. The current maximum cost that Social Services pays is $1300. 6.2 Section 4.17 of the current by-law states: “Notwithstanding sub-sections 4.1 to 4.15, inclusive, burial rights for graves provided for assisted burials cannot be transferred or sold and shall remain vested with the Municipality in perpetuity.” Page 104 Municipality of Clarington Page 11 Report LGS-012-22 6.3 The Municipality of Clarington (and Social Services) does not provide a marker for “assisted burials”. To do so, would be a large cost to the Municipality. 6.4 However, for monuments on “assisted burials”, we informally allow a person (either at the time of passing or in the future) to sign a n indemnity declaration on the Monument Order Form and pay for a marker/monument on an “assisted burial grave” despite grave ownership being retained by Clarington. 6.5 Similarly, there are instances where the rights holder is the deceased, but a relative wishes to place a marker/monument. Staff have been informally allowing this, with the use of an indemnity form. 6.6 Therefore, Staff are recommending that we add a definition for “assisted burials” and a section permitting persons to place a marker/monument on an “assisted burial grave” or if the deceased is the rights holder, to codify the informal practice. 6.7 Additionally, in order to provide recognition of burials, buried without a marker, Staff will investigate the cost and feasibility to provide a digital record, to be available on Clarington website, of all burials in Clarington’s cemeteries. Markers in Addition to Monuments 6.8 Section 8.9 of the current Cemetery By-law states: “Only one Monument shall be erected within the designated space on any Lot.” 6.9 However, there is no language around how many (and size of) “markers” may be added. Although this is not usually an issue because most names are included in the monument, Staff are suggesting a limit of one monument, with the possibility of additional markers, at the discretion of the Cemetery Operator. Staff are also suggesting that the current by-law be changed to define monuments as either upright or as a pillow style both require a foundation and a base. And further, add to the definition of “marker” that “no foundation is required”. Cleaning of Monuments 6.10 The current Cemetery By-law is silent on the cleaning of monuments. The industry recommends that monuments not be cleaned as it deteriorates the material. 6.11 Staff recommends adding a section, within the Memorialization section, that states “The Cemetery Operator is not responsible for the cleaning of any monuments and/or markers.” Page 105 Municipality of Clarington Page 12 Report LGS-012-22 Flower Stands/Hangers 6.12 There is currently no prohibition against hanging flowerpot holders/stands and they can be a hazard if they are caught by maintenance equipment. However, in the Bowmanville Cemetery Lots A-CC are the existing sections and the loved ones have certain expectations and traditions. 6.13 In order to balance existing traditions, with the protection of property, Staff recommend adding the following section to the “Decorations” section: “Pot hangers/holders/stands are prohibited.” Notwithstanding section XX [above], pot hangers/holders/stands are allowed in St. Georges Cemetery, Hampton Cemetery, Bond Head Cemetery, Bowmanville Cemetery lots A-CC, and the Orono Cemetery lots excluding A, D, and G.” Cremation Monuments 6.14 We have had inquiries about cremation monuments that have niches built-in. See the image for example. 6.15 Staff have concerns about it looking too much like a personal columbarium (i.e. monuments are owned by family and therefore can’t have privately owned niches within the cemetery); who would have access; who would hold the keys/opening devices for each one; the nameplate may be subject to deterioration/damage during maintenance with it being so low to the ground. 6.16 Therefore, Staff are recommending that a definition for a niche monument (with a cavity) be added and that niche monuments be prohibited in all cemeteries. 6.17 Similarly, Staff are recommending that bench monuments be prohibited. 7. Price List Charges for Corner Stones 7.1 Although it happens infrequently, sometimes customers wish to place cornerstones at the corners of the graves. They may include an initial of a loved one that is included in the grave. These cornerstones are small in size (6” x 6”), and sit flush with the ground, but still require oversight by Staff. 7.2 The Cemetery By-law currently does not include a reference to cornerstones either in the definition or in the fee section. Page 106 Municipality of Clarington Page 13 Report LGS-012-22 7.3 These cornerstones can become problematic for maintenance as they can be susceptible to frost heave. 7.4 Staff are recommending that the following be included in the by-law: Change the definition of “corner posts” to “corner stones”. A section stating that, as of the effective date of the by-law, no further corner stones are permitted, but the current corner stones are “grandfathered in”. Replacement Granite Niche Plaque Fees 7.5 All replacement plaques are ordered and administered through Clarington. The current rate charged to the customer for the replacement of a granite niche plaque is $317.24+HST=$358.48. The monument company charges Clarington $310 (as of March 2022) at Orono Cemetery because of the uniqueness of the plaques in the Orono Cemetery. This leaves only $7 to cover the cost of administration and installation. However, the cost charged by the monument company, for the other cemeteries, is lower and there is a larger margin. 7.6 Staff have reviewed the pricing and believe that, given the few instances per year of Orono replacement plaques, the pricing can remain the same for all cemeteries. Opening Fees for Orono and Hampton Cemeteries 7.7 When Clarington assumed the responsibility of the Hampton and Orono cemeteries, best efforts were made to harmonize the previous cemetery by-laws with Clarington’s. However, it has come to Staff’s attention that Hampton and Orono niches purchased “prior to Clarington assuming responsibility” included an opening fee, whereas Clarington’s by-law reflects the sale and opening costs separately. Staff have been dealing with this informally by waiving the opening fee for these circumstance s. 7.8 To address this disconnect, Staff are recommending that the Cemetery by-law include a section making it clear that niches purchased prior to the Hampton and Orono acquisitions include an opening fee and therefore will not be charged an additional opening fee. Provincial License Fee 7.9 In accordance with the Act, as part of the interment fee process, every deceased requires a Provincial License Fee, as prescribed by the Act. However, the current by- law is silent on this, except that it is listed in the Price List. Page 107 Municipality of Clarington Page 14 Report LGS-012-22 7.10 Staff recommend that wording be added to the current section 7.5, as follows, “including the Provincial License Fee, for each individual interred.” Disinterment for Niches 7.11 Although the Cemetery By-law contains a fee for the disinterment of graves, the by-law is silent on disinterments for niches or opening of niches. 7.12 The definition of “interment right” in the current Cemetery By-law is “the right to require or direct the interment of human remains or cremated human remains in a grave, lot, or niche and direct the associated memorialization.” 7.13 Staff regularly have requests to open niches to add “personal objects/treasures”. Although the by-law is silent on this, Staff have held the position that the niches should only be opened for the movement of human remains, which is in line with the “interment right”. 7.14 Since a niche disinterment involves the same staff time as an interment of a niche, Staff are recommending that a fee equal to the niche interment fee be added as a disinterment fee ($206.21) equal to the fee for an interment. To achieve this change, a definition/prohibition of niche disinterment/opening will be added to make it clear that it is for the “removal of human remains” (not for the purpose of adding personal objects, which is not permitted). This would also address the trinkets/treasures concern. Additionally, Staff are recommending a provision that the “removal of a joint urn to add a second set of human cremated remains (work performed by a funeral home) would not be considered a disinterment”. 7.15 Although there is a definition for interment and disinterment, these definitio ns are for full casket burial and cremation graves, but we do not have wording surrounding interment and disinterment for niches. 7.16 Staff are recommending that the interment and disinterment definitions be expanded to include niches and the disinterment fees be structured similar to the interment fees. Burial Permit Fees 7.17 Currently, Clarington charges $25 to the Funeral Homes, for processing burial permits. The fee has remained the same for many years. 7.18 Staff have reviewed other area municipalities’ burial permit fees and, to be consistent with the majority of Durham Region, recommend keeping it at $25 (although outside of Clarington, the price widely varies). Page 108 Municipality of Clarington Page 15 Report LGS-012-22 7.19 The following table shows the charges within Durham Region: Municipality Registration Fee Ajax $25 Whitby $25.00 or $125 for after-hours Brock $20.00 or $50.00 for after-hours Scugog $20.00 Uxbridge $20.00 Pickering $25.00 Oshawa $30 Timing of CPI as Basis for Increases 7.20 In accordance with the amending By-law 2019-045, the Price List, commencing on May 1st, 2020, increased in accordance with the November over November, Ontario All- Items Consumer Price Index (CPI). 7.21 This means that Staff must wait until the third week of December for the November CPI to be released, then make the necessary changes in the system prior to the Christmas shutdown. 7.22 Staff are recommending that the increase be based on the October CPI (which is released in the third week of November) to take effect on January 1st. Capping the CPI Increase 7.23 As we experienced in 2020, due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the CPI in 2020, the CPI can be a negative. Similarly, it could be zero increase or wildly high. The following table illustrates the fluctuations, using the CPI: Date CPI March 2022 6.7 November 2021 4.7 November 2020 1.0 November 2019 2.2 November 2018 1.7 7.24 Staff, in consultation with the Deputy CAO/Treasurer, are recommending that, in the event that the CPI is a negative, the prices be kept the same. In the event that the CPI is more than 5%, the price increases be capped at 5%. Page 109 Municipality of Clarington Page 16 Report LGS-012-22 Rounding 7.25 As outlined in Report OPD-006-19, for ease of quotation to the customer, it was recommended that, after the CPI has been applied, the resulting price would be rounded to the nearest five-dollar increment. 7.26 This has resulted in an unintended larger percentage impact on some of the smaller prices. 7.27 Staff are recommending that the increases be based on the actual “pre-rounded” price from the previous year and rounded to the nearest dollar for the current year. Move Price List to Fee By-law 7.28 Since 1960, when the first Cemetery By-law was established, the Price List have been included in the Cemetery By-law. Since that time, Council has established a Fee By-law and has been slowly moving the fees to the Fee By-law to provide for a consolidated by- law for ease of reference. 7.29 Staff have consulted with the Bereavement Authority of Ontario (BAO) and they recommend that the “price list remain separate from your by-laws so that price increases do not necessitate a by-law change as price increases are not required to be sent in for a stamp/approval by the BAO”. 7.30 Therefore, Staff are recommending that the Cemetery Price List be moved to the Fee By-law by approving the attached Fee By-law Amendment (Attachment 2), including all references to “Schedule A”, the Tariff of Rates, being changed to the “Fee By-law”. 8. Housekeeping 8.1 The proposed by-law also includes the following housekeeping items (all references to sections refer to sections in the current by-law): a) Change references to his/her to “their” throughout by-law. b) Change references to “Municipal Clerk’s Department” to “Clerk’s Division”. c) Change reference from “fully human remains” to “full-body human remains”. d) Updating and addition of various definitions to be more in line with the sample by-laws provided by the BAO. e) Update definition of “Director” from “Director of Operations” to “Director of Public Works” Page 110 Municipality of Clarington Page 17 Report LGS-012-22 f) Update definition of “Treasurer” from “Director of Finance/Treasurer” to “Deputy CAO/Treasurer”. g) Subsection 2.1 – “September to June” to the regular hours of operation. h) Subsection 2.1.1 of the current Cemetery By-law states: “No person shall enter or remain in a Cemetery between sundown and 8:00 PM without the permission of the Cemetery Operator.” The “PM” is an error and is corrected in the proposed by-law to “a.m.”, which also makes it consistent with the hours of operation listed in subsection 2.1. i) Subsection 3.1, regarding the supply of cemetery services, changed to add “other than those authorized by the Cemetery Operator.” j) Subsection 4.3, regarding the documents provided to the purchaser, add subsection 4.3(d) “any other documents as required under the Act” (to cover the requirement for providing a copy of the Consumer Information Guide). k) Subsection 7.2, regarding the issuance of burial permits, change “A burial permit issued by the Registrar General” to ‘A duly issued burial permit” (since it is the Municipality that issues the burial permit not the Registrar General). l) Subsection 10.8, regarding breakable materials, add “porcelain and clay items” to this section, which currently reads: “Lettered boards, signs, items made of glass in whole or in part, crockery items or wind chimes are prohibited.” m) Renumbered, and change references to sections, as appropriate. n) Other minor wording, grammar, spelling, or changes necessary to be in conformity with sample wording from the BAO. 9. Timing 9.1 In accordance with Section 151 of Regulation 30/11 of the Act, no cemetery by-law or by-law amendment is effective until, the cemetery operator has filed it with the registrar, performed the notice requirements, and the by-law has been approved by the Registrar of the BAO. Page 111 Municipality of Clarington Page 18 Report LGS-012-22 9.2 Regarding the notice requirements, the Act requires the Cemetery Operator to publish in the newspaper, post on a sign at the cemetery for four weeks and notify all monument companies. 9.3 The BAO has indicated that the normal business standard for the BAO review of by - laws is 45 days. 9.4 The review of the by-law has taken some time, but Staff are recommending that the new by-law be approved soon to allow for the four-week notice period, then the passing of the by-law, and the BAO review. 9.5 There is no requirement to send the fee by-law amendment to the BAO for approval, however, the price changes require lead time for notification to the local funeral homes and their customers. Section 69(2) of O. Reg. 30/11 states: The cemetery operator shall provide the copies required by subsection (1) at least 30 days before the effective date of any changed price. 9.6 Staff are therefore recommending that the fee by-law amendment be in place for the October CPI change affecting the next price change. 10. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Director of Public Works and the Deputy CAO/Treasurer who concur with the recommendations. 11. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that Council approve the attached draft by-laws regarding Cemetery Operation. Staff Contact: June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk, 905-623-3379 ext., 2102 or jgallagher@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 – Proposed Cemetery By-law Attachment 2 – Proposed Fee By-law Amendment By-law Page 112 Municipality of Clarington Page 19 Report LGS-012-22 Interested Parties: The following interested parties are to be notified of Council’s decision: Funeral Homes dealt with in the past 12 months: Ainsworth Funeral Home Allison Funeral Home Armstrong Funeral Home Barnes Memorial Funeral Home Brock & Visser Funeral Home Chapel Ridge Funeral Home Courtice Funeral Home Fallis & Shields Funeral Home McIntosh-Anderson-Kellam Funeral Mackey Funeral Home Morris Funeral Home Newcastle Funeral Home Nisbett Funeral Home Northcutt Elliott Funeral Home Oshawa Funeral Home Monument Companies dealt with in the past 12 months Campbell Monuments Kawartha Monuments Oshawa Monument Company Peterborough Monument Works Stafford Monument Company Page 113 Attachment 1 to Report LGS-012-22 Page 1 of 17 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-law 2022-0XX Being a by-law to provide for the maintenance, management, regulation , and control of the cemeteries in the Municipality of Clarington. Whereas The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington owns, and operates, the following municipal cemeteries: Bowmanville Cemetery, located at 1330 Haines Street, Bowmanville; Bond Head Cemetery, located at 44 Queen Victoria Street, Newcastle; St. George’s Cemetery, located at 2 Browview Road, Bowmanville; Hampton Union Cemetery, located at 5810 Old Scugog Road, Hampton; Orono Cemetery, located at Lot 28, Mill Lane, Orono.; And whereas the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002, S.O. 2002 c.33 regulates the operations of cemeteries in Ontario; And whereas the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it desirable to enact a By-law to regulate the operation of municipal cemeteries; Now therefore the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington hereby enacts as follows: 1. Approval These by-laws are the rules and regulations that govern the Bowmanville Cemetery, Bond Head Cemetery, St. George’s Cemetery, Hampton Union Cemetery, and Orono Cemetery, and have been approved by the Registrar, Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002 (FBCSA), Bereavement Authority of Ontario (BAO). 2. Definitions “Act” means the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002 (FBCSA), S.O. 2002 c.33. “Ashes” means the cremated or aquamation remains of a deceased human body. “Assisted Burial” means a burial when the deceased’s estate is unable to cover the cost of the burial and Social Services pays for the grave and interment, to ensure that individuals who are in receipt of social assistance, indigent persons, and persons in financial need may have their remains interred or cremated in a respectful and dignified manner. Page 114 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 2 of 17 “Burial” means the opening and closing of an inground lot or plot for the disposition of human remains or cremated human remains. “Care and Maintenance Fund” means the requirement under the Act and Regulations that a prescribed amount or a percentage of the purchase price (excluding tax) of all interment and scattering rights sold, transferred, assigned , or permitted; and prescribed amounts for monuments and markers is c ontributed into the care and maintenance fund. “Casket” means the container/coffin in which human remains are interred. “Cemetery” means those areas inside the Bowmanville Cemetery, St. George’s Cemetery, Bond Head Cemetery, Hampton Union Cemetery and Orono Cemetery set aside for the interment of human remains or ashes. “Cemetery Operator” means the Municipality of Clarington. “Columbarium” means a structure (a niche wall) designed for the purpose of interring and preserving of cremated remains in sealed compartments (niches). “Contract” means the signed contract between the purchaser of Interment Rights and the Cemetery Operator detailing the obligations of both parties, and acknowledging receipt and acceptance of the cemetery by-laws, a copy of the Consumer Information Guide and the Price List. “Corner Stones” means any stone or other land markers, usually 6”x 6”, set flush with the surface of the ground and used to indicate the location of a lot or plot. “Corporation” means the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington. “Cremation Monument” see “Niche Monument”. “Director” means the Director of Public Works of the Municipality of Clarington or their designate. “Disinterment” means the digging/removal and re-interment of a casket, vault or urn from a burial lot or niche. “Grave” (Also known as Lot) means any inground burial space intended for the interment of a child, adult, or cremated human remains. “Holiday” means a Statutory or Declared Holiday as well as any day designated in a collective agreement approved by the Municipality of Clarington. “Human remains” means the remains of a deceased human body. “Infant Baby Land” = IBL = means a part of a cemetery designated for infants with a grave no bigger than 18” x 36”. Page 115 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 3 of 17 “Interment” means the opening of a lot and then the placing of dead human remains or cremated human remains in that lot, followed by closing the lot. The lot may be a grave in the ground, a crypt in a mausoleum , or a niche in a columbarium. “Interment Right” means the right to require, or direct, the interment of human remains or cremated human remains in a grave, lot, or niche and direct the associated memorialization. “Interment Rights Certificate” means the document issued by the Cemetery Operator to the purchaser once the interment rights have been paid in full, identifying ownership of the interment rights. “Interment Rights Holder” means any person authorized, or entitled, to inter human remains in a specified lot. “Lot” (also known as Grave) means a single grave space. “Marker” means any permanent memorial structure that is set flush and level with the ground, where no foundation is required and used to mark the location of a burial. “Memorial Bench” means a bench (typically granite) personalized with lettering/dates/artwork placed on a burial lot. “Monument” means any permanent memorial projecting above the ground installed to mark the location of a burial or lot. This may include an upright or pillow style requiring a foundation and a base. “Municipal Clerk” means the Clerk of the Municipality of Clarington or their designate. “Niche” means an individual compartment in a columbarium for the entombment of cremated human remains. “Niche Monument” means a permanent memorial installed by individuals to mark the location of a particular burial, or a lot, which includes individual compartment(s) intended for the entombment of cremated human remains. “Plot” means a parcel of land, sold as a single unit, containing multiple lots. “Register” means an up-to-date record (within five days of interment) of the name and address of each Interment Rights Holder and the location of the lot. The name and address of the original Interment Rights Holder, any date of transfer, and to whom the rights were transferred. The name of each person interred, the location within the Cemetery, and the date of interment, particulars regarding disinterments including the name of the person disinterred, date of disinterment, who authorized the disinterment, where the remains were re-interred, or the person who took possession of the remains. “Registrar” means the Registrar of the Bereavement Authority of Ontario (BAO). Page 116 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 4 of 17 “Social Services Burial” see “Assisted Burial”. “Third Party Purchaser” means any person who purchased Interment Rights from a source other than the Cemetery Operator, in accordance wit h the provisions of this by-law. “Urn” see Vessel. “Vault” means a manufactured fiberglass or concrete shell that the casket is placed into prior to an Interment. “Vessel” means a container for cremated remains. 3. General 3.1 Hours of Operation Visitation Hours: 8:00 a.m. to Sundown Office Hours: 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (September to June) 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (July and August) Interment Hours: 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Note, the Office for the Cemeteries is the Municipal Clerk’s Division, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville. 3.2 No person shall enter or remain in a Cemetery between sundown and 8:00 a.m. without the permission of the Cemetery Operator. 3.3 The hours of operation shall not apply to a police constable and employees of the Municipality of Clarington in the performance of their duties. 3.4 Conduct The Cemetery Operator reserves full control over the Cemetery operations and management of land within the Cemetery grounds. No person may damage, destroy, remove, or deface any property within the Cemetery. All visitors shall conduct themselves in a quiet manner that shall not disturb any service being held. 3.5 Liability The Cemetery Operator shall not be held liable for any loss or damage, without limitation (including damage by the elements, Acts of God, or vandals) to any lot, plot, columbarium niche, monument, marker, or other article that has been placed in relation to an Interment, save and except for direct loss or damage caused by gross negligence of the Cemetery Operator. Page 117 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 5 of 17 3.6 Public Register Section 110 of O. Reg. 30/11 requires all cemeteries and crematoriums to maintain a public register that is available to the public during regular office hours. The Public Register shall be available to the public through the Municipal Clerk’s Division during regular office hours. 3.7 Pets or Other Animals Pets or other lower animals, including cremated animal remains, are not allowed to be buried on Cemetery grounds. 3.8 Right to Re‐Survey The Cemetery Operator has the right at any time to re ‐survey, enlarge, diminish, re-plot, change or remove plantings, grade, close pathways or roads, alter in shape or size, or otherwise change all or any part of the Cemetery, subject to approval of the appropriate authorities. 3.9 Interments on a Statutory Holiday or Sundays No interment shall be made on a Statutory Holiday, or Sunday, without payment of an extra charge as set forth in the Fee By-law. This extra charge is not applicable when there is a written order, from a Medical Officer of Health, for interment. 3.10 Memorial Services Memorial Services greater than 75 people shall require advanced notice to the Cemetery Operator. 4. Cemetery Services 4.1 Cemetery services available from the Municipality of Clarington shall not be allowed to be supplied by any person, other than those authorized by the Cemetery Operator. “Cemetery Services” shall include: a) cutting grass and general care of lots; b) planting trees, shrubs and grass; c) setting grave markers, and memorials; d) construction of a foundation for monuments and markers; e) opening and closing of graves; and f) disinterment or removal of human remains. Page 118 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 6 of 17 5. Disinterment or Removals 5.1 Unless otherwise directed by the Medical Officer of the Department of Health, no human remains may be disinterred from the Grave without written consent of the Interment Rights Holder. 5.2 No disinterment or removal of any casketed human remains shall be allowed except as ordered by those defined in the Act and in the presence of the Cemetery Operator, and upon due observance of all other requirements of the Act and regulations. 5.3 No opening of a niche is permitted except for the addition or removal of human remains. 5.4 Removal of a joint urn to add a second set of human cremated remains (work performed by a funeral home employee) would not be considered a disinterment. 5.5 A certificate from the local Medical Officer of Health is not required for the removal of cremated remains. 6. Oversized Vaults 6.1 Where a Vault has a width of more than 2' 6" (0.762 metres), or a length of more than 7' 6" (2.286 metres), the Cemetery Operator shall not be obliged to permit the interment unless there is sufficient space to accommodate it; and the Cemetery Operator shall not be obliged to permit the erection of any Monument where there is insufficient room left for the foundation. 7. Sale and Transfer of Interment Rights 7.1 Purchasers of interment rights holders acquire only the right to direct the burial of human remains, and the installation of monuments, markers , and inscriptions, subject to the conditions set out in the cemetery by-laws. In accordance with cemetery by-laws, no burial, entombment, or installation of any monument, marker, inscription, or memorialization is permitted until the interment rights have been paid in full. An interment rights certificate will be issued to the Interment Rights Holder(s) when payment has been made in full. The purchase of interment rights is not a purchase of Real Estate or real property. 7.2 Subject to availability of Lots, Interment Rights may be purchased from the Municipality at the rates set out in the Fee By-law. The rates for Interment Rights include the portion specified by the Act for deposit to the Cemetery’s Care and Maintenance Fund except for transactions with a grave (i.e. transfer, interment or installation of a marker/monument) that was purchased previously and included the “care and maintenance” at the time of purchase. Page 119 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 7 of 17 7.3 Payments for Interment Rights shall be made payable to the Municipality of Clarington, through the Municipal Clerk’s Division. 7.4 Upon payment in full, the Municipality shall provide each purchaser of Interment Rights with: a) a copy of the Contract; b) a copy of the Cemetery By-law; c) a Certificate of Interment Rights; and d) any other documents as required under the Act 7.5 Purchasers of lots acquire only the right and privilege for the interment of human remains and the placing of markers, subject to this By-law. 7.6 To ensure accuracy of the Register, no transfer of any Interment Right or any interest therein shall be binding upon the Municipality, unless application for the Transfer has been submitted, including necessary supporting documentation, and the original Certificate of Interment Rights returned, as required under Subsection 4.9 a). Upon receipt of such application and payment of the prescribed fee, the Transfer shall be made and a new Certificate of Interment Rights issued. 7.7 The sale of Interment Rights shall be limited to a maximum of six lots/graves/niches to each individual. 7.8 For sales after the effective date of this by-law, the sale of six niches shall not be continuous (i.e. not a whole row). Third Party Purchases/Re-Sales 7.9 An interment rights holder wishing to resell their interment rights may advise the cemetery operator of their intention prior to seeking a third-party buyer for their interment rights. 7.10 Subject to the provisions of this By-law and the Act, and provided that no part of the Interment Rights have been exercised, an Interment Rights Holder may sell, or transfer, their Interment Rights to a Third Party Purchaser at no more than the current price, so long as the sale or transfer is conducted through the Cemetery Operator and the interment rights holder and purchaser meet the qualifications and requirements. 7.11 If an Interment Rights Holder is unable to find a third Party Purchaser at the current purchase price, the Municipality may buy the rights back at a negotiated price. Page 120 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 8 of 17 7.12 No person shall purchase Interment Rights for the sole or primary purpose of reselling the Rights with a view to making a financial gain. The Interment Rights may not be sold to Third Party Purchasers for more than the price set out in the current Price List (contained in Clarington’s Fee By-law) as the case may be. 7.13 An Interment Rights Holder intending to sell their Interment Rights to a Third Party Purchaser shall provide the Municipality with the following documentation so that the Municipality can confirm the ownership of the Rights and provide the Third Party Purchaser with the required documentation: a) an Interment Rights certificate endorsed by the current Rights holder; b) if the resale involved Interment Rights, a written statement of the number of Lots that have been used in a Plot and the number of Lots that remain available; and c) any other documents in the Interment Rights Holder’s possession relating to the Rights. 7.14 To complete the sale of the Interment Rights to a Third Party Purchaser the Municipality may also require: a) a statement signed by the Interment Rights Holder(s) selling the Interment Rights acknowledging the sale of the Rights to the Third Party Purchaser; b) confirmation that the person selling the Interment Rights is the person registered on the Cemetery records and that they have the right to re- sell the Interment Rights; c) a record, setting out the date of the transfer of the Interment Rights to the Third Party Purchaser; and d) a statement of any money owing to the Municipality in respect of the Interment Rights. 7.15 The Third Party Purchaser will be provided with the following documents by the Municipality: a) a new Certificate of Interment Rights; b) a copy of this By-law; c) a copy of the current Price List (contained in Clarington’s Fee By-law); d) If the resale involves Interment Rights, a written statement of the number of Lots that have been used in a Plot and the number of Lots that remain available; and e) any other documentation in the Interment Rights Holder’s possession relating to the Rights. Page 121 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 9 of 17 7.16 Upon completion of the procedures detailed in the “Third Party Purchaser” section of this by-law, and at the approval of the Municipal Clerk, the Third Party Purchaser shall be considered the current Interment Rights Holder and the resale or Transfer of the Interment Rights shall be considered completed. Transfer by Will or Bequest 7.17 In cases of Transfer by will or bequest, the Municipal Clerk shall have the right, in their sole discretion, to require the production of a notarized copy of the will or other evidence sufficient to prove ownership. Cancellation of Interment Rights within 30 Day Cooling-Off Period 7.18 In accordance with the Act, any Interment Rights Holder may cancel the Interment Rights within thirty (30) days of signing the Contract by providing written notice of the cancellation to the Cemetery Operator. The Cemetery Operator will refund all monies paid by the purchaser within thirty (30) days from the date of the request for cancellation. 7.19 Upon receiving written notice from the purchaser, the Cemetery Operator will cancel the contract and issue a refund to the purchaser for the amount paid for the interment or scattering rights. This refund will be made within thirty (30) days of receiving said notice. If the interment rights certificate has been issued to the interment rights holder(s), the certificate must be returned to the Cemetery Operator along with the written notice of cancellation. 7.20 No refund will be made for any Lot if any portion of the Interment Rights have been exercised. 7.21 Notwithstanding subsections 7.1 to 7.17, inclusive, burial rights for graves provided for assisted burials cannot be transferred or sold and shall remain vested with the Municipality in perpetuity. 8. Care and Maintenance Fund Contributions 8.1 Interest earned from this fund is used to provide care and maintenance of lots, plots, markers, and monuments. 8.2 Contributions to the Care and Maintenance Fund are not refundable except when Interment Rights are cancelled within the 30 day cooling off period. 8.3 Where interment rights were sold before 1955 and no trust funds were collected for the purpose of care and maintenance (or perpetual care as was often the term used pre-1955), the Municipality shall charge the interment rights holder care and maintenance fees, at the t ime the rights are either transferred or at the time the rights are executed (including erecting a monument). The rate shall be based on the approved rates. Page 122 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 10 of 17 9. Errors 9.1 In the event that an error on the part of the Municipality is discovered with an Interment Right prior to the use of the lot/niche for Interment, and that niche is no longer available, the Municipality shall: a) promptly notify the Interment Rights Holder of the error; b) amend the affected Contract and Certificate of Interment Rights of that lot/niche, or other Interment Right made prior to the enactment of this By-law, so as to provide a lot/niche of equal or greater value and similar location acceptable to the Interment Rights Holder; or c) cancel the Interment Rights and refund the full amount paid as evidenced in the Municipality’s records. 9.2 The Interment Rights Holder shall notify the Municipality of their preference within 30 days of the notification of the error; otherwise, the Municipality shall be entitled to make the decision. 10. Interments 10.1 Interment Rights Holders must provide written authorization prior to an Interment. Should the Interment Rights Holder be deceased, authorization must be provided in writing by the person authorized to act on behalf of the Interment Rights Holder (i.e. Personal Representative, Estate Trustee, Executor, succession Rights holder, or next of kin). 10.2 A duly issued burial permit, or equivalent document showing that the death has been registered with the Province, must be provided to the Cemetery Operator prior to an Interment taking place. 10.3 A Certificate of Cremation must be submitted to the Cemetery Operator prior to the Interment of cremated remains. 10.4 The Cemetery Operator shall be given 24 business hours of notice for each Interment. 10.5 Payment for Interment, and the Provincial License Fee for each individual interred, must be made to the Cemetery Operator, payable to the Municipality of Clarington through the Municipal Clerk’s Division before an interment can take place. Page 123 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 11 of 17 10.6 Notwithstanding subsection 10.5, an interment can take place, without payment for interment for niches purchased in the: Hampton Cemetery prior to June 28, 2013; and Orono Cemetery prior to June 1, 2019. 10.7 Notwithstanding subsection 10.5, an interment can take place for an assisted burial prior to receipt of payment for the Interment, provided the Municipal Clerk has received written confirmation from Social Services of a commitment to pay for the services. 10.8 The opening and closing of Graves or Niches may only be conducted by Municipal staff or those designated to do work on behalf of the Cemetery Operator. Scattering 10.9 No person shall scatter cremated remains on, or within, any Grave. More than Two in One Lot 10.10 Due to the instability of the soil, the top of any interment container shall be 36” (91.5 cm) below ground surface for safety reasons. Regardless of the manner in which the Grave is prepared, only one full-body Human Remains is to be interred in any single Lot. 10.11 Human cremated remains shall be allowed to be interred with full-body Human Remains. The limit shall be three cremated remains with one full- body Human Remains in any single Lot or, four cremated remains if there is no full human remains. 10.12 Notwithstanding Subsection 10.11, if the lot is being used for both full-body burials and cremated remains, full-body burials must be in place prior to placing cremated remains in any single lot. 10.13 Notwithstanding Subsection 10.11, for those who purchased Lots or Plots: In the Bowmanville Cemetery prior to July 1, 2005, requesting a double interment in one Lot, the limit shall be four cremated remains with two full-body Human Remains in any single Lot; In the Orono Cemetery prior to June 1, 2019, six cremations will be permitted with the approval of the Cemetery Operator; In the Hampton Cemetery, six cremations will be permitted in all graves (as all graves were sold prior to Clarington assuming the cemetery). Page 124 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 12 of 17 11. Memorialization 11.1 No memorial or other structure shall be erected or permitted on a Lot until all setup and foundation fees have been paid in full including markers requested to be installed for graves provided for assisted burials. 11.2 No Monument, footstone, marker, or memorial of any description shall be placed, moved, altered, or removed without permission of the Cemetery Operator. 11.3 Minor scraping of the monument base of an upright monument due to grass/lawn maintenance is considered to be normal wear and tear. 11.4 The cemetery operator will take reasonable precautions to protect the property of interment rights holders, but it assumes no liability for the loss of, or damage to, any monument, marker, or other structure, or part thereof. 11.5 Memorials – monuments, markers, plaques etc. are owned by the interment rights holder and the cemetery operator is not responsible for their loss or deterioration. These memorials should be protected by the interment rights holder’s own insurance coverage. 11.6 Monuments, footstones, markers, or memorials may be purchased and placed on an assisted burial grave by a person, or by a relative of a deceased person where the deceased person is the rights holder, provided they sign an indemnity declaration on the Monument Order Form. 11.7 The Cemetery Operator is not responsible for the cleaning of any monuments and/or markers. 11.8 Memorials – monuments, markers, plaques etc. are owned by the interment rights holder and the Cemetery Operator is not responsible for their loss or deterioration. These memorials should be protected by the interment rights holder’s own insurance coverage. 11.9 All foundations for Monuments and Markers shall be built by or contracted to be built for, the Cemetery Operator at the expense of the Interment Rights Holder. 11.10 Should any Monument or Marker present a risk to public safety because it has become unstable, the Cemetery Operator shall do whatever it deems necessary by way of repairing, resetting, or laying down the Monument or Marker or any other remedy so as to remove the risk. 11.11 The Cemetery Operator reserves the right to remove at its sole discretion any Marker, Monument, or inscription which is not in keeping with the dignity and decorum of the Cemetery as determined by the Cemetery Operator. 11.12 No niche/cremation monuments are permitted on a burial lot. Page 125 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 13 of 17 11.13 No memorial benches are permitted. 11.14 No corner stones are permitted to be installed after the effective date of passing of this by-law. 11.15 All Monuments shall be mounted only on a stone or concrete base or footing and the base or footing shall be constructed by the Cemetery Operator and set flush with the level of the adjoining ground. 11.16 A Monument or other structure shall be erected only after the specific design plans have been approved by the Cemetery Operator including dimensions, material of structure, construction details, and proposed location. 11.17 The minimum thickness for flat markers, including footstones, is 4 inches or 10 cm. 11.18 Only one Monument shall be erected within the designated space on any Lot. 11.19 Notwithstanding subsection 11.18, additional markers may be permitted, at the discretion of the Cemetery Operator. 11.20 Every Monument shall be made of bronze, natural stone (granite or marble or other durable stone used for that purpose) with no vertical joint and no ornament of stone, metal or other material attached thereto. 11.21 No Monument shall be delivered to the Cemetery for installation until the Monument foundation has been completed, and the Interment Rights Holder(s) and/or Monument supplier have been notified by the Cemetery Operator. 11.22 Every Marker for a single Grave shall be of a size as nearly as practicable, of 18” X 24” (45.7 cm X 61 cm) width, with a thickness of from 3” to 8” (7.6 cm to 20.3 cm). 11.23 No Monument shall exceed 48” (122 cm) in height, including base or footing, above the level of the adjoining ground, and when located on a Lot shall not exceed 10% of the Lot area. When located on a Plot, the base shall not exceed 14” X 38” (35.5cm x 96.5 cm). Page 126 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 14 of 17 12. Care and Planting 12.1 The interest generated from the Care and Maintenance Fund shall be used to maintain, secure and preserve the Cemetery grounds, including: a) re-leveling and seeding of Lots or scattering grounds; b) maintenance of cemetery roads, sewers, and water systems; c) maintenance of perimeter walls and fences; d) maintenance of cemetery landscaping; e) maintenance of mausoleum and columbarium; and f) repairs and general upkeep of cemetery maintenance buildings and equipment. 12.2 No person, other than the Cemetery Operator, shall remove any sod or in any other way change the surface of the Cemetery. 12.3 No person shall plant flower beds or live plants that exceed 12”. 12.4 No person shall install plant/garden borders of any kind. 13. Decorations 13.1 The Cemetery Operator reserves the right to regulate the articles placed or hung, on Lots, Plots, columbariums, or niches that: pose a threat to the safety of all Interment Rights Holders, visitors to the Cemetery, and Cemetery employees; prevents the Cemetery Operator from performing general cemetery operations; or are not in keeping with the respect and dignity of the Cemetery. Items will be removed and disposed of without notification. 13.2 Notwithstanding subsection 13.1, no articles will be allowed in new areas, specifically: In sections DD and any new sections in the Bowmanville Cemetery; In Sections A, D, and G in the Orono Cemetery; and Columbariums constructed after the passing of this by-law. 13.3 Columbarium decorations should be no more than 4” in any direction from the opening of the holder. 13.4 The Cemetery Operator reserves the right to disallow or remove quantities of memorial wreaths or flowers considered to be excessive and that diminish the otherwise tidy appearance of the Cemetery. Page 127 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 15 of 17 13.5 Memorial wreaths may be placed in the Cemetery between the last day of October and the first day of April. In order to prepare the grounds for spring, wreaths must be removed prior to the first day of April. Wreaths not removed by the first day of April will be removed and disposed of by the Cemetery Operator without notification. 13.6 The following are permitted at the front of a Grave, not more than 12” (30.5 cm) from the Marker or Monument: a) unbreakable flowerpots; and b) planted flowers 13.7 Floral stands are to be of a single leg support type and may not exceed 48” (122 cm) with no more than two stands per Monument. The arms of the stand must not project more than 12” (30.5cm) from the Marker or Monument. Stands not in compliance will be removed by the Cemetery Operator. 13.8 Pot hangers/holders/stands are prohibited. 13.9 Notwithstanding subsection 13.8, pot hangers/holders/stands are allowed in St. Georges Cemetery, Hampton Cemetery, Bond Head Cemetery, Bowmanville Cemetery lots A-CC and the Orono Cemetery lots excluding A, D, and G. 13.10 Flowers placed on a Grave for a funeral shall be removed by the Cemetery Operator after a reasonable time to protect the sod and maintain the tidy appearance of the Cemetery. 13.11 Planted items must be in alignment with, and in close proximity to, the Marker. Flowering plants must be grown only in front of the Marker and shall not extend more than 12” (30.5 cm) from the Marker. Maintenance involves pruning to limit height of trees to 48” (122 cm), and laterally to within the boundaries of the Interment Rights Holder’s Lot. Flowering plants must be weeded and watered. The plants may be removed and discarded at the discretion of the Cemetery Operator. 13.12 Lettered boards, signs, items made of glass, porcelains and clay items, in whole or in part, crockery items or wind chimes are prohibited. 14. Contractor/Monument Dealer 14.1 Any contract work to be performed within the Cemetery requires the written pre‐approval of the Interment Rights Holder and the Cemetery Operator before the commencement of the work. Work requiring pre‐approval includes landscaping, delivery of Monuments and Markers, inscriptions, designs, drawings, plans and detailed specifications relating to the work, proof of all applicable government approvals and permits, and the location of the work to be performed. Page 128 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 16 of 17 14.2 All contractors shall report to the Cemetery Operator and provide the necessary approvals before commencing work at any location in the Cemetery. 14.3 Prior to the start of any said work, contractors must provide proof of: a) WSIB coverage; b) Occupational Health and Safety compliance standards; c) Environmental Protection; d) WHMIS; and e) evidence of liability insurance of not less than $2 million. 14.4 All contractors and all work carried out by contractors within the Cemetery shall comply with the requirements of this By-law. 14.5 No contractor, monument dealer or supplier shall enter the Cemetery outside of the Interment Hours unless approval has been granted by the Cemetery Operator. 14.6 No work shall be performed at the Cemetery except during the regular Interment Hours. 14.7 Contractors shall temporarily cease all operations if they are working within 100 metres of a funeral until the conclusion of the service. The Cemetery Operator, at their sole discretion, reserves the right to temporarily cease contractor operations, if the noise of the work being performed by the contractor is deemed to be a disturbance to any funeral or public gathering within the Cemetery. 14.8 Contractors, monument dealers and suppliers shall lay wooden planks on the Lots and paths over which heavy materials are to be moved in order to protect the surface from damage. 15. Columbarium 15.1 Only the Cemetery Operator may open and seal Niches for Interments. This applies to the inside sealer and the Niche front. 15.2 To ensure quality control, desired uniformity, and standard of workmanship, the Cemetery Operator reserves the right to inscribe all Niche fronts or install all lettering, vases, adornments, or any other approved attachment. 15.3 No person, other than the Cemetery Operator, shall remove or alter niche fronts. Page 129 Cemetery By-law 2022-xxx Page 17 of 17 16. By-Law Amendments 16.1 The Cemetery shall be governed by this By-law, and all procedures will comply with the Act and Ontario Regulation 30/11, which may be amended periodically. All By‐law amendments must be: a) published once in a newspaper with general circulatio n in the locality in which the Cemetery is located; b) conspicuously posted on a sign at the entrance of the Cemetery; c) delivered to each supplier of markers who has delivered a marker to one of the Clarington cemeteries during the previous year, if the by‐law or by‐law amendment pertains to Markers or their installation; and d) posted on the municipal website. 16.2 All by‐laws and by‐law amendments are subject to the approval of the Registrar. 17. General 17.1 By-laws 2012-061, 2013-006, 2013-065, 2015-037, 2016-002, 2016-072, 2019-045, 2020-044 are hereby repealed. 17.2 In the event that any provisions of this By-law are deemed to be invalid or void, in whole or in part, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining terms and provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 17.3 This By-law shall be effective the date that it is approved by the Registrar. By-Law passed in open session this ______ day of ______, 2022. _____________________________________ Adrian Foster, Mayor _____________________________________ June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk Page 130 Attachment 2 to Report LGS-012-22 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-law 2022-0XX Being a By-law to add Schedule “H”, the Cemetery Price List, to the Fee By-law 2010-142. Whereas the Council for the Municipality of Clarington adopt the recommendations in Report LGS-012-22 to move the price list from the Cemetery By-law to the Fee By-law. Now therefore be it resolved that The Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That a Cemetery Price List, Attachment A to this by-law, be added to the Fee By-law, By-law 2010-142 as Schedule “H”. 2. That this By-law shall come into effect on the date of passing. By-Law passed in open session this XXth day of ______, 2022. _____________________________________ Adrian Foster, Mayor _____________________________________ June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk Page 131 Attachment A to By-law 2022-XXX By-law 2010-142 Schedule “H” Cemetery Price List 2022 & Beyond The Cemetery Price List, beginning with the 2023 Price List, shall be adjusted, without amendment to this By-law annually on January 1st in each year, in accordance with the October over October, Ontario All -Items Consumer Price Index (CPI) with a lower limit of zero (when the CPI is negative) and upper limit of 5% (when the CPI exceeds 5%); rounded to the nearest dollar based on the actual “pre- rounded” price from the previous year. Definitions and regulations shall be found in the Cemetery By-law. The following are the 2022 rates: 1. Sale of Plots Type of Lot Dimension Bowmanville Dimension Bondhead 40% Care & Maintenance Cost HST Total Single 3’ X 9’ 3’ X 9’ $818.48 $2,046.20 $266.01 $2,312.21 Infant 1.5 ‘ X 3’ 1.5 ‘ X 3’ N/A No Charge N/A N/A Cremation 2’ X 2’ 2’ X 2’ $272.83 $88.67 $88.67 $770.74 2. Sale of Cremation Niches Columbarium Niche Size 15 % Care & Maintenance Cost HST Total Niche (including Plaque) 12” X 12” X 12” $350.55 $2,337.01 $303.81 $2,640.82 3. Interment Cost HST Total Adult – Single Depth $1,078.62 $140.22 $1,218.84 Adult – Double Depth $1,342.99 $174.59 $1,517.58 Cremation $412.41 $53.61 $466.02 Niche $206.21 $26.81 $233.02 Infant / Child No Charge N/A N/A Page 132 Attachment A to By-law 2022-XXX 4. Disinterment Charges NOTE: Does not include reinterment. Regular interment fees apply for reinterment within a Clarington Cemetery. Disinterment Type Cost HST Total Adult – Single Depth $1,776.55 $230.95$ $2,007.50 Adult – Double Depth $2,136.09 $277.69 $1,858.40 Cremation $486.44 $63.24 $549.69 Niche $206.21 $26.81 $233.02 Infant $486.44 $63.24 $549.68 5. Additional Charges Cost HST Total Saturday Plot Interments $253.79 $32.99 $286.78 Saturday Cremation/Niche Interments No Additional Charge 0 0 Sunday & Stat Holidays Plot Interments $597.47 $77.67 $675.14 Sunday & Stat Holidays Cremation/Niche Interments $216.78 $28.18 $244.96 Rental for lowering device, set up and dressing $137.47 $17.87 $155.34 Provincial Licence Fee $12.00 N/A $12.00 Granite Plaque Replacement $317.24 $41.24 $358.48 6. Administrative Fees Cost HST Total Transfer Fee $37.01 $4.81 $41.82 Duplicate or Replacement Certificate $37.01 $4.81 $41.82 Third Party Sale Transfer $37.01 $4.81 $41.82 Transfer Back to Municipality $37.01 $4.81 $41.82 Page 133 Attachment A to By-law 2022-XXX 7. Monument Foundations and Setting Markers Monument Foundation or Marker Setting Type Grave Type Maximum Size Care & Maintenance Flat Fee Price HST Total Monument Regular Height: 4 ft See body of By-law for details on size $200.00 $454.71 $85.11 $739.82 Flat Marker Regular 24 ½” x 18 ½” $100.00 $285.52 $50.12 $435.64 Cremation 22” x 16” $100.00 $126.90 $29.50 $256.40 Block IBL 16 ½” x 10 ½” N/A $126.90 $16.50 $143.40 Foot Marker All 16” x 10” N/A $126.90 $16.50 $143.40 Removal of Monuments All N/A N/A $89.88 $11.68 $101.56 Page 134 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE RESOLUTION #_________________ DATE June 6, 2022 MOVED BY CORINNA TRAILL SECONDED BY ____________ W hereas when an Official Plan Amendment, Rezoning Application, Zoning By- law Amendment or Zoning By-law Application is being considered by Council, and Clarington law enforcement has file open which runs concurrent to and pertains to the subject of such Official Plan Amendment, or Zoning By-law Amendment or Rezoning Application, past practice has been for Clarington Law Enforcement to stay the file pending a final resolution by Council of such Amendment or Application being considered. And whereas the interests of justice dictate that like cases should be treated in a like manner; And whereas Council has final say on all policy matters; Now therefore be it resolved that: 1. The Enforcement By-Law be amended to reflect that where a by-law matter has a policy component, the past practice as per Official Plan Amendments, Rezoning Applications, Zoning By-Law Amendments and Zoning By-Law Applications of staying the by-law enforcement matter pending a final resolution of Council on the policy aspect of the enforcement matter shall automatically apply; and 2. This amendment to the Enforcement By-Law applies to all ongoing and future by-law enforcement matters but shall have no retroactive application; and 3. If there is uncertainty as to whether a by-law enforcement matter has a "policy" component, the issue shall be referred to Council for a determination. Page 135 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: June 6, 2022 Report Number: FSD-019-22 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO By-law Number: File Number: Resolution#: Report Subject: 2021 Annual Investment Report Recommendation: 1. That Report FSD-019-22 be received for information. Page 136 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report FSD-019-22 Report Overview The following report is the annual reporting requirement under the Municipality of Clarington's Investment Policy. Regulations under the Municipal Act, 2001 require that the Treasurer report certain information to Council on an annual basis and certify compliance with the Municipality's adopted Investment Policy. This report fulfills the annual reporting requirement under the Municipal Act, 2001 and the Municipality's Investment Policy. At December 31, 2021, the Municipality was in compliance with the Province of Ontario’s eligible investment regulations and the Municipality’s approved Investment Policy. Investment Income for the Municipality was approximately $3.7 million which is slightly higher than $3.6 million in 2020. During the year, investable funds increased from $121.1 million to $158.9 million. Overall the return on investment was 2.44% which is a reasonable return given interest rates during 2021. 1. Background 1.1 In June 2018, through report FND-011-18 the Municipality of Clarington reviewed and revised its Investment Policy. This policy requires the Treasurer of the Muni cipality to report the state of the Municipality's investments to Council on an annual basis. 1.2 Section 8 of the Municipality’s Investment Policy requires the Treasurer to report on an annual basis to Council on the performance of the investments, the balance of the investment portfolio, and the Municipality’s compliance with the investment policy and goals. 1.3 A snapshot summary of key information pertaining to the portfolio follows: Fund Opening Balance, January 2021 Closing Balance, December 2021 Investment Income Return on Average Balance General Fund $26,436,972 $41,092,730 $1,060,574 3.14% Development Charges Reserve Fund 31,788,316 32,604,525 624,705 1.94% Page 137 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report FSD-019-22 Fund Opening Balance, January 2021 Closing Balance, December 2021 Investment Income Return on Average Balance Non-DC Reserve Fund 52,290,047 74,387,525 1,123,800 1.77% Strategic Capital Reserve Fund 10,551,081 10,783,566 612,865 5.75% $121,066,416 $158,868,346 $3,421,944 2.44% Investment Environment in 2021 1.4 Interest rates continued to be low in 2021 as Ontario, Canada and the World continued to deal with the impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Fixed income investments such as GICs, bonds and deposit notes continued to have significantly lower rates of return. 1.5 Throughout 2021, the Bank of Canada's target for the overnight rate was 0.25%. The "Bank Rate" was 0.50% for the year, demonstrating the extremely low return environment the Municipality tends to invest in. 1.6 Three times during 2021, the Municipality's primary banking partner reduced the interest rate on its general bank account. Staff mitigated this decrease by moving funds to other institutions, including high-interest savings accounts. The reduction of bank interest rates was not a uniquely Clarington issue, as many municipalities in Ontario had similar experiences. Looking into 2022 1.7 Financial Services is looking at a rebalancing of the reserve funds to ensure investments align with the needs of the individual funds and better reflect the timing requirements of those funds. 1.8 Staff expect that fixed income investment rates will rise in 2022 as the Bank of Canada increases the overnight and bank rates; however, it is also expected that inflation will continue to be high in 2022 which does impact the Municipality’s purchasing power. Page 138 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FSD-019-22 Staff continue to look at different investment vehicles to maximize investment returns while mitigating risk. 1.9 It is expected that the investment mix within the Municipality will continue to diversify. The historical tendency to invest in GICs does not meet the need of the Municipality from a rate of return perspective. The primary objective is capital preservation; however, the changing economic and investment environment means that these objectives can be met through other instruments while earning a reasonable return. 1.10 Staff continue to monitor the adoption of prudent investor standard across Ontario. The City of Quinte West and the Municipality of Neebing joined the ONE JIB effective January 1, 2022, through the adoption of the prudent investor standard. Effective April 1, 2022, the City of Thunder Bay is also joining the ONE JIB. 1.11 Staff are currently only aware of the investment boards established by the City of Toronto (under the City of Toronto Act), ONE JIB (a joint-board under the Municipal Act) and the City of Barrie (an investment board under the Municipal Act) whic h provide for the applicable municipalities to invest under the prudent investor standard. The Municipality of Clarington continues to follow the legal-list of eligible investments. 2. Performance of the Investment Portfolio 2.1 The Municipality's portfolio consists of several funds, including general funds, trust funds, reserve funds, and other investments. General Fund 2.2 The General Fund is the primary operating fund for the Municipality. This fund has the least number of active investments. The majority of the investments in this fund are in the HISA operated by ONE Investment Inc. This HISA account offers favourable interest rates for a highly liquid investment. 2.3 The ONE Investment Inc. HISA was established in September 2016 and held low balances throughout 2017. In 2018, the Municipality began being more active with its investments and moved funds from the lower interest -earning bank accounts to the higher HISA account. At December 31, 2021, the ONE Investment HISA had approximately $5.1 million (2020 - $23.4 million). Funds held in the HISA are available within 24 hours. 2.4 In 2021, the Municipality opened a HISA with Scotiabank which provides a higher interest rate, however, notice of 30-days is required to withdrawal funds. During the year, $30 million was transf erred from the ONE Investment HISA to the Scotiabank HISA, this provides the Municipality approximately $5 million available within 24 hours and $30 million available within 30 days. Page 139 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report FSD-019-22 Non-Development Charges Reserve Funds 2.5 The Municipality operates a Non-Development Charges Reserve Fund investment portfolio for all reserve funds not established under the Development Charges Act, 1997. There is one exception: the Strategic Capital Reserve Fund, a separate fund. 2.6 The total book value of investments is approximately $74.4 million (2020 - $51.3 million), including approximately $27.4 million (2020 - $26.5 million) in bank balances. At December 31, 2021 the portfolio was comprised of $10.2 million (2020 - $14.8 million) in GICs with maturities in each of 2022 and 2023 and $20.8 million (2020 - $9.1 million) in bonds with maturities from 2027 to 2032. The portfolio includes $16.0 million (2020 - $0) in principle-protected notes; these are bank notes which are linked to an index but are issued by a chartered bank. For purposes of this report, the TD Bank Reserve Fund bank account is included in this portfolio. 2.7 The Municipality has adopted a five-year laddering strategy for these investments with roughly equal distribution each year. This ensures that assets will be cashable in any given year and can be withdrawn from the reserve fund. At December 31, 2021, the third and fourth year of this ladder is lacking as interest rates for those years over the past year have not been attractive enough to lock in funds for that amount of time. Staff continue to monitor and invest in 2024 and 2025 as rates become feasible. 2.8 In 2019, as a result of a decrease in interest rates for GICs, the Municipality started to look at bonds to continue to have safe investments with a reasonable return. The bonds held by the Municipality include Canadian chartered banks (BMO, TD and Bank of Nova Scotia) and the City of Toronto. Although bonds have a longer maturity, they are generally reasonably liquid as they are a ctively traded in the market. The Municipality has also began to invest in Principle-Protected Notes (PPN) which are bank issued deposit notes, linked to an equity index (but the Municipality does not own the equity) Development Charges Reserve Funds 2.9 The Development Charges Reserve Fund portfolio meets the obligations of the Municipality under the relevant legislation for Development Charges. 2.10 The Municipality has two accounts with the ONE Investment Program related to this fund: a Bond account and an Equity account. 2.11 Clarington opened its ONE Investment bond account in 2000. The investment pool was transferred to its current custodian in 2005 with a book value of $2.6 million. As at December 31, 2021 the book value, as a result of reinvested income, was $4.4 million (2020 - $4.3 million). This is an increase of 69.2% over 16.75 years, or 4.1% per year. At December 31, 2021 the market value was below book value, however, the adjusted return is still 3.5% per year since 2005. Page 140 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report FSD-019-22 2.12 The ONE Investment equity account was established in 2007 with an initial investment of $500,000 and a $2.0 million investment during 2020. At December 31, 2021 the book value of the investment is $2.8 million (2020 - $2.6 million) resulting from reinvested income and capital gains. The portfolio had a market value of $4.2 million. In 2021 there was an increase in the market value of $473,158 on top of approximately $246,941 of reinvested income in the portfolio. Strategic Capital Reserve Funds 2.13 The Municipality established the Strategic Capital Reserve Fund portfolio to hold investments for the Strategic Capital Reserve Fund specifically. This reserve fund was created to provide a funding source for economic development activities. The intent was to keep the $10.0 million capital as a source of internal borrowing for economic development capital investments. Interest earned on the investments is transferred to the general fund to offset the tax levy. 2.14 This fund invests $4.7 million (2020 - $6.7 million) in GICs with maturities ranging from December 2022 to June 2024. Interest rates vary from 1.63% to 3.2%. Bonds of Canadian chartered banks worth $4.8 million (2020 - $3.8 million) with maturities from November 2027 to January 2032 are also held with an interest rate of 1.4 to 3.1%. 2.15 In 2021, the fund invested in debt from the Province of Ontario with a face value of $1.2 million. The debt matures June 2031 with an interest rate of 1.65%. Overall Performance 2.16 The total income for 2021 and 2020, excluding trust funds and Elexicon, by fund are summarized below: Fund 2021 Income 2020 Income 2019 Income 2018 Income General Fund $1,060,573 $1,046,664 $1,129,639 $1,351,995 Development Charges Reserve Fund 624,705 923,855 1,339,291 1,386,839 Non-DC Reserve Funds 1,123,800 1,343,802 336,824 976,382 Page 141 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report FSD-019-22 Fund 2021 Income 2020 Income 2019 Income 2018 Income Strategic Capital Fund 612,865 45,342 493,389 202,027 Total Investment $3,421,943 $3,359,663 $3,299,143 $3,917,243 3. Compliance with Investment Policy 3.1 The Municipality of invests based on the legal list of investments outlined in O.Reg. 438/97 as amended. The legal list is very prescribed and limits the ability of the Municipality to diversify its investments fully; however, it is relatively secure. Investment Accounts 3.2 The Municipality of Clarington holds its investments through investment accounts with several financial organizations. In determining whether the Municipality is meeting its investment policies, the underlying asset is considered, not the custodian of the investment. 3.3 In 2021, the Municipality opened an investment account with ScotiaBank. This account is a high-interest savings account that provides a premium interest rate; however, the Municipality must provide 30-days notice to withdraw funds. 3.4 The Municipality held the following accounts throughout 2021: Institution Accounts Held TD Bank General Fund bank Several small bank accounts Reserve Fund bank account Guaranteed Investment Certificates (GICs) Page 142 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report FSD-019-22 Institution Accounts Held RBC Dominion Securities Reserve Fund investment account DC Reserve Fund investment account Strategic Capital Fund investment account ONE Investment Inc. Hight Interest Savings Account (HISA) Equity portfolio investment account Bonds portfolio investment account BMO Nesbitt Burns General fund investment Reserve Fund investment account ScotiaBank High Interest Savings Account (HISA) 3.5 The investment accounts with RBC Dominion Securities and BMO Nesbitt Burns hold a variety of investment instruments which could include GICs, government bonds, and bank deposit notes Diversification Risk 3.6 The Municipality holds investments of several different types. It is essential to diversify the types of investments with an extensive portfolio to reduce the risk to the overall portfolio from variations in any one market. The following table shows the December 31, 2021, investments by type as well as the minimum and maximum percentage allowed per the Investment Policy: Page 143 Municipality of Clarington Page 9 Report FSD-019-22 Investment Type Book Value at December 31, 2021 Percentage of Holdings Minimum Range Maximum Range High Interest Savings Account $ 62,531,592 39.3% 0.0% 100.0% Provincial Debt 11,007,539 6.9% 0.0% 80.0% Municipal Debt 5,273,571 3.3% 0.0% 35.0% Financial Institutions 70,487,041 44.3% 0.0% 80.0% Corporate Debt (non- financial) 2,499,594 1.6% 0.0% 10.0% ONE Investment Pools 7,224,710 4.5% 0.0% 25.0% Total $159,024,047 3.7 The policy guideline for financial institutions is zero percent to 80 percent of the investment portfolio. At December 31, 2021, the Municipality was within this limit. 3.8 While within the policy limits, the above indicates that the Municipality is heavily concentrated in Canadian financial institutions. Most of the investment s consist of GICs purchased initially with a five-year term. Liquidity Risk 3.9 The Municipality attempts to balance cash flows through the timing of the maturity of investments. Staggered maturity dates ensure that cash is readily available to meet the needs of the Municipality and reduces interest rate risk. At December 31, 2021, the maturity dates, and allowable ranges, of investments held by the Municipality were as follows: Page 144 Municipality of Clarington Page 10 Report FSD-019-22 Timeframe Book Value at December 31, 2021 Percentage of Portfolio Minimum Range Maximum Range Up to 90 Days $ 71,830,823 45.2% 20.0% 100.0% 90 Days to 1 Year 3,837,128 2.4% 30.0% 100.0% 1 to 5 Years 21,838,289 13.7% 0.0% 85.0% 5 to 10 Years 56,679,358 35.6% 0.0% 50.0% 10 to 20 Years 4,841,449 3.0% 0.0% 30.0% $ 159,027,047 3.10 The Municipality's Investment Policy indicates the target range for less than 90 days is 20% to 100%, and less than one year is 30% to 100%. The amount shown above that is 90 days to 1 year should be added to the amount held less than 90 days to determine compliance with the requirement. Total amounts maturing less than one year is $75,667,951, which is 47.6% of the investment portfolio. 3.11 The Municipality's HISA and TD Reserve Fund bank accounts are considered to have a maturity of less than 90 days, as they are available to the Municipality within 24 hours. 3.12 The Municipality is allowed in certain circumstances to invest in terms greater than ten years, at December 31, 2021, there was $4.8 million (2020 - $4.8 million) invested with a maturity greater than ten years. These investments are bonds held in the three reserve fund investment portfolios and are traded on an active market. Concentration Risk 3.13 The Municipality attempts to diversify its investment portfolio by restricting the percentage of investments any single institution may have. Diversification mitigates the risk to the Municipality if an investment becomes insolvent. Note that the Canadian Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) only guarantees investments up to $100,000 per institution, therefore, most of the Municipality's investments are not insured through CDIC. Page 145 Municipality of Clarington Page 11 Report FSD-019-22 3.14 At December 31, 2021 the Municipality's investments by institution were as follows: Institution Book Value at December 31, 2021 Percentage of Portfolio Maximum Allowed TD Bank - Savings $ 27,438,107 17.3% 100.0% ONE – HISA 5,081,669 3.2% 100.0% ONE – Equity 2,835,624 1.8% 15.0% ONE – Bond 4,389,086 2.8% 15.0% Scotiabank HISA 30,011,060 18.9% 100.0% Royal Bank of Canada 8,191,674 5.2% 25.0% RBC – HISA 75,278 0.0% 100.0% National Bank 8,805,845 5.5% 25.% Bank of Nova Scotia 13,256,329 8.3% 25.0% Bank of Montreal 25,865,779 16.3% 25.0% HSBC 3,358,884 2.1% 25.0% TD Bank 9,549,817 6.0% 25.0% Province of British Columbia 3,773,141 2.4% 20.0% Page 146 Municipality of Clarington Page 12 Report FSD-019-22 Institution Book Value at December 31, 2021 Percentage of Portfolio Maximum Allowed City of Toronto 4,778,046 3.0% 10.0% Province of Alberta 6,118,857 3.8% 20.0% Province of Quebec 2,499,732 1.6% 20.0% Ontario Hydro 2,499,594 1.6% 5.0% Regional Municipality of York 498,525 0.3% 10.0% $159,027,047 4. Concurrence Not Applicable. 5. Conclusion 5.1 In my opinion, all investments were made in accordance with the investment policies and goals adopted by the Municipality of Clarington and are in compliance with the regulations adopted under the Municipal Act, 2001. 5.2 In my opinion, the Municipality was compliant with its investment policy at December 31, 2021. 5.3 It is respectfully recommended that this report be received. Staff Contact: Trevor Pinn, CPA, CA, Director of Financial Services/Treasurer, 905-623-3379 ext.2602 or tpinn@clarington.net. Attachments: Page 147 Municipality of Clarington Page 13 Report FSD-019-22 Not Applicable Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 148 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: June 6, 2022 Report Number: FSD-024-22 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution#: File Number: By-law Number: Report Subject: Asset Management Plan Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-024-22 and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That the Municipality's 2022 Asset Management Plan attached to Report FSD-024- 22 as Attachment 1, be approved, in principle, subject to formatting and branding guideline changes; 3. That Staff be directed to report back to Council in 2023 with options to reduce the infrastructure funding gap sustainably; and 4. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-024-22 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 149 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report FSD-024-22 Report Overview The Municipality of Clarington is required, in compliance with Ontario Regulation 588/17, Asset Management Planning for Municipal Infrastructure, to complete an updated Asset Management Plan by July 1, 2022. The Municipality of Clarington Asset Management Plan 2022 includes update information for the Municipality’s roads, bridges, and stormwater assets. The current state of the assets, replacement values, key performance indicators and life cycle activities are included in this phase of the asset management plan. While a funding strategy is not required at this time, Staff are recommending that options for sustainably funding the infrastructure gap be brought back to Council in 2023. 1. Background 1.1 The Municipality of Clarington's first asset management plan was approved in 2013 through the adoption of Report FND-020-13. This asset management plan was for roads and bridges and was to meet the requirements of the Small Rural and Northern Municipal Infrastructure Fund – Capital Program. 1.2 In 2017, the Municipality completed the 2017 Comprehensive Asset Management Plan which was "received to comply with funding agreements" through Report FND-014-17. This plan included bridges and culverts, buildings, fleet, roads, parks, storm sewers, and sidewalks. 1.3 In 2017, it was anticipated that more formal requirements for asset management plans would be prescribed through regulation by the Province of Ontario. Asset management planning is a foundational process for creating financially sustainable municipalities; the current requirement by the Province ensures that municipalities complete these steps in a consistent manner that will allow comparability between municipalities. 2. Ontario Regulation 588/17 Asset Management Planning for Municipal Infrastructure 2.1 On December 13, 2017, the Province of Ontario made Ontario Regulation 588/17: Asset Management Planning for Municipal Infrastructure under the Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act, 2015. This regulation set new requirements for municipalities across Ontario regarding their asset management planning initiatives. 2.2 The regulation lays out four dates that municipalities must proceed through on their asset management journey. As a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic, the Province of Ontario delayed the requirements for phases two through five by one year. Page 150 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report FSD-024-22 Phase Due Date Description Phase 1 July 1, 2019 All municipalities are required to prepare and publish a strategic asset management policy. Phase 2 July 1, 2022 All municipalities must develop enhanced asset management plans covering core infrastructure assets. (Core assets include: road, bridges, stormwater, water and wastewater assets) Phase 3 July 1, 2024 All municipalities must expand enhanced asset management plans to cover all infrastructure assets. Phase 4 July 1, 2025 Expand asset management plans to provide additional details for all infrastructure assets. Phase 5 Every 5 years The Phase 4 compliant asset management plan shall be updated at least every five years after it is approved. 2.3 The regulations required that all asset management plans must be endorsed by the executive lead of the municipality and approved by a resolution passed by the municipal council. 2.4 The Municipality is required to post its current asset management policy and each of its asset management plans on a website that is available to the public (www.clarington.net) as well as provide the asset management plan to any person who requests it. The Municipality has developed a page specific to Asset Management on its website that will hold the required information for the public . Phase 1 - Strategic Asset Management Policy 2.5 The first phase was the adoption of a Strategic Asset Management Policy. The first policy was required to be adopted by July 1, 2019 , and shall be reviewed and updated at least every five years. 2.6 At its meeting of April 15, 2019, General Government Committee approved the Municipality's Strategic Asset Management Policy through the adoption of Report FND- 010-19. Page 151 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FSD-024-22 Phase 2 and 3 – Asset Management Plans, Current Levels of Service 2.7 Every municipality shall prepare an asset management plan in respect of its core municipal infrastructure assets by July 1, 2021, and in respect of all of its other municipal infrastructure assets by July 1, 2023. 2.8 Plans in these phases are focused on the current levels of service that municipalities generate from their assets. The regulations require an asset management plan to include the following: a. For each asset category, the current level of service provided, determined using the required qualitative and technical metrics based on data at most two calendars years old; b. The current performance of each asset category, determined in accordance with performance measures established by the municipality, with data at most two calendar years old; c. A summary of the assets in each category, the replacement cost of the assets in each category, the average age of the assets in the category; condition information on the assets and a description of the approach for assessing the condition of the assets in the category; d. For each asset category, the lifecycle activities that would need to be undertaken to maintain the current levels of service for each of the 10 years in the plan. The cost of the lifecycle of the assets, the options for which lifecycle activities could be undertaken, the risks with those options and the lowest cost options are also provided for each asset category; and, e. As Clarington has a population over 25,000 it is required to provide additional information regarding the population growth and the impact on its asset management plan. Phase 4 – Asset Management Plans, Proposed Levels of Service 2.9 In addition to the asset management plans created in Phase 2 and Phase 3, the Municipality will be required to adjust these plans to include the following additional information: a. For each asset category, the levels of service that the Municipality proposes to provide in each of the following ten years; b. An explanation of why the proposed levels of service are appropriate for the municipality, based on an assessment of the options and risks of the proposed Page 152 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report FSD-024-22 levels on long term sustainability, how the proposed levels differ from the current levels of service, whether the proposed levels are achievable and the ability for the municipality to afford the proposed levels of service; c. The proposed performance of each asset category for each of the ten -year period; d. Lifecycle management and financial strategy that sets out the following for each asset category: i. the full lifecycle of the assets, options for lifecycle activities to achieve the proposed levels of services, risks associated with those activities, the activities at the lowest cost to achieve the levels of service; ii. an estimate of the annual costs for each of the ten years in the plan separated into capital and operating costs; iii. identification of the annual funding projected to be available to undertake the activities and an explanation of options examined to maximize funding; iv. if a shortfall is identified, which activities will be undertaken and if applicable the risks associated with not undertaking any of the identified activities. e. The growth impacts on the ten-year period will be required to be incorporated into the asset management plan created in this phase. Phase 5 - Future Updates of Asset Management Plans 2.10 O.Reg 588/17 requires that every municipality shall review and update its asset management plan at least five years after the year in which the plan is completed in Phase 4 and every five years after that. 2.11 The requirement to update asset management plans reflects that the document is a "living document" that must be reviewed and updated as the status of the infrastructure assets of a municipality evolve. New technologies, legislation and service expectations will all impact future asset management plans as the Municipality of Clarington develops. 2.12 Each year, council shall conduct an annual review of its asset management progress on or before July 1 in each year starting the year after the Phase 4 asset management plan is completed. 2.13 The review will address the following: a. The municipality's progress in implementing its asset management plan; Page 153 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report FSD-024-22 b. Any factors that impeding the municipality's ability to implement its asset management plan; and c. A strategy to address the factors mentioned in (b). 3. The 2022 Municipality of Clarington Asset Management Plan 3.1 The 2022 Asset Management Plan covers roads, bridges and culverts and stormwater assets. As the Municipality does not have water and wastewater assets , these are not applicable, although we do work with the Region of Durham on timing to ensure that our asset projects are aligned. 3.2 The following summarizes the infrastructure costs owned by the Municipality of Clarington and the annual investment required to maintain the current levels of service. Asset Category 2020 Replacement Cost Annual Investment Required Current Investment (2022 Budget) Annual Shortfall Stormwater $188,266,200 $2,294,500 $1,284,500 $1,010,000 Roads 714,628,400 22,455,700 7,104,600 15,351,100 Bridges and Culverts 200,020,200 2,561,600 2,380,000 181,600 $1,102,914,800 $27,311,800 $10,769,100 $16,542,700 3.3 The 2022 current investment includes projects funded by the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund. The OCIF annual funding is approximately $1.8 million historically, which is used for road rehabilitation projects; these are lifecycle activities to prolong the useful life of road assets. It is anticipated that the Municipality will not be eligible for OCIF starting in 2023 unless changes to the program occur. Page 154 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report FSD-024-22 Stormwater Management 3.4 Stormwater assets include ponds, conduit (storm sewer pipe), maintenance holes, catch basins, inlet/outlet structures as well as oil grit separators. The assets often are contributed by developers as part of subdivision assumption. 3.5 The following summarizes the number of assets within the Stormwater asset category: Asset Segment Quantity 2020 Replacement Cost Ponds – Wet 23 $5,638,700 Ponds – Dry 15 3,074,300 Conduit (km) 260 129,019,500 Maintenance Holes 4,072 35,987,600 Catch Basins 6,378 13,063,000 Inlet/Outlet Structures 184 244,700 Oil Grit Separators 13 1,238,500 $188,266,300 3.6 Approximately 68.6% of conduit and 69.3% of structures are rated good to very good , while 7.5% of conduit and 7.6% of structures are rated poor to very poor. All wet ponds and 93.3% of dry ponds are rated good to very good. The annual investment is approximately 60% of the annual need, and this may indicate that the condition of the assets will begin to deteriorate over time as the investment does not keep up with the anticipated lifecycle requirements. Page 155 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report FSD-024-22 3.7 Stormwater conditions were assessed with the help of the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA). Their report is included for information as Attachment #2. Roads 3.8 Road assets include surface and base. Road surface is further separated into unpaved roads (earth, gravel) and paved roads (high class bituminous 1 to 4 and low-class bituminous). The following provides a summary of the road network: Asset Segment Quantity (Km) 2020 Replacement Cost Earth Roads 40 $0 Gravel Roads 65 3,533,900 High Class Bituminous 1 (HCB-1) 1 410,000 High Class Bituminous 2 (HCB-2) 4 1,839,000 High Class Bituminous 3 (HCB-3) 164 53,390,700 High Class Bituminous 4 (HCB-4) 259 84,393,300 Low Class Bituminous 366 32,555,300 Road Base 914 538,506,300 $714,628,500 3.9 The majority of the Municipality's roads are rated good (10%) to very good (48%) with only 5% rated as critical and 21% rated as poor. Page 156 Municipality of Clarington Page 9 Report FSD-024-22 Bridges and Culverts 3.10 Bridges and culverts include culverts and bridges with a span of 3m or greater and may include both pedestrian or vehicular travel. Bridges are inspected every other year in accordance with Provincial legislation, and repairs are prioritized based on the conditions of the structures. 3.11 The Municipality owns the following bridge and culvert assets: Asset Segment Quantity (each) 2020 Replacement Cost Bridges – Cast in Place 80 $65,386,000 Bridges – Precast Concrete 13 46,098,200 Bridges – Steel 4 4,973,100 Bridges – Timber/Wood 2 1,221,400 Culverts 149 77,365,200 Pedestrian Bridges 24 4,976,300 $200,020,200 3.12 Of the bridges and culverts in our inventory, 68% are rated good or very good while 20% are rated poor to very poor. The annual investment in bridges and culverts is approximately 92.9% of the annual required need. Page 157 Municipality of Clarington Page 10 Report FSD-024-22 Financing Strategy 3.13 Under the requirements of O.Reg 588/17, this asset management plan does not include a financing strategy that Council must adopt. This requirement will be in the final phase of AMP development. 3.14 However, it is prudent to recognize that there is an annual funding gap that could result in deteriorating levels of service, increased future costs that could be avoided, or service interruptions. 3.15 Some municipalities in Ontario have utilized dedicated infrastructure levies to reduce the infrastructure backlog and deficit. The approved Budget Policy (Report FND-002-19) included 1.5% to 2.0% per year as a target increase for the capital budget. This amount was determined based on the 2017 identified requirement for a 1.7% (in 2017 dollars) increase in order to reduce the infrastructure backlog; however, this is not a dedicated infrastructure levy, and the approved increases in 2020 to 2022 have been in line with inflation. 3.16 Staff would like to explore options for developing a reliable funding source as part of the budget process. This may include a dedicated infrastructure levy, a dedicated portion of the general levy for capital, or a combination of both. 4. Concurrence Not Applicable. 5. Conclusion 5.1 It is respectfully recommended that Council approve the 2022 Asset Management Plan to fulfill the requirements of O.Reg 588/17 and the Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act, 2015. 5.2 It is recommended that Staff continue to proceed with the next phase of the asset management planning journey, which will include the remaining infrastructure assets that the Municipality owns. 5.3 It is recommended that Staff be directed to consider options available to the Municipality to reduce the infrastructure funding gap in a sustainable manner. Page 158 Municipality of Clarington Page 11 Report FSD-024-22 Staff Contact: Erika Watson, CAMP, Asset Management and Development Financing Manager, 905-623-3379 ext. 2607 or ewatson@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 – 2022 Municipality of Clarington Asset Management Plan Attachment 2 – Storm Sewer Risk Assessment prepared by the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 159 Page 160 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 6 What is Asset Management? ........................................................................................... 6 Asset Management Plan Purpose ................................................................................... 6 Corporate Asset Management Plan Overview ................................................................ 7 Asset Management Policy ................................................................................................ 7 Corporate Asset Management Framework...................................................................... 7 Statement of Local Infrastructure ..................................................................................... 10 Storm Water Management ............................................................................................. 10 What do we own? What is it worth?........................................................................... 11 Useful life .................................................................................................................... 13 Asset Condition .......................................................................................................... 16 Roads .............................................................................................................................. 21 What do we own? What is it worth?........................................................................... 21 Useful life .................................................................................................................... 24 Asset Condition .......................................................................................................... 28 Bridges & Culverts .......................................................................................................... 33 What do we own? What is it worth?........................................................................... 33 Useful life .................................................................................................................... 38 Asset Condition .......................................................................................................... 39 Levels of Service .............................................................................................................. 44 Storm Water Management ............................................................................................. 44 Current Level of Service ............................................................................................. 44 Current Performance Measures................................................................................. 51 Roads .............................................................................................................................. 53 Current Level of Service ............................................................................................. 53 Current Performance measures................................................................................. 58 Bridges & Culverts .......................................................................................................... 59 Current Level of Service ............................................................................................. 59 Current Performance measures................................................................................. 64 .................................................................................................................................... 65 Page 161 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 2 Lifecycle Management Strategy ....................................................................................... 66 Storm Water Management ............................................................................................. 66 Lifecycle Activities ...................................................................................................... 66 Storm Water Conduit Maintenance Activities: ........................................................... 66 Full Lifecycle Costs .................................................................................................... 75 Risks Associated with Lifecycle Options ................................................................... 79 Roads .............................................................................................................................. 79 Lifecycle Activities ...................................................................................................... 79 Full Lifecycle Costs .................................................................................................... 86 Risks Associated with Lifecycle Options ................................................................... 87 Bridges & Culverts .......................................................................................................... 88 Lifecycle Activities ...................................................................................................... 88 Full Lifecycle Costs .................................................................................................... 90 Risks Associated with Lifecycle Options ................................................................... 95 Growth Impact of Asset Management ............................................................................. 98 Clarington’s Official Plan (2018) .................................................................................... 98 Development Charges Study (2020) ............................................................................. 99 Appendices ..................................................................................................................... 102 Appendix 1: Storm Water 10-year Replacement Forecast ........................................102 Appendix 2: Road Assets 10-year Replacement Forecast ........................................106 Appendix 3: Bridges and Culverts 10 -year Replacement Forecast ...........................131 Appendix 4: Lifecycle Events per Storm Water Asset - Conduit ................................133 Appendix 5: Lifecycle Events per Storm Water Asset – Structures ...........................134 Appendix 6: Lifecycle Events per Storm Water Asset – Ponds .................................138 Page 162 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 3 Executive Summary The Municipality of Clarington’s infrastructure systems support a wide range of municipal services that enable residents, businesses, and other Clarington stakeholders to live, work and play in our Municipality. This Asset Management Plan (“AMP” or the “Plan”) document focuses on Clarington’s core infrastructure of bridges and culverts, roads, and storm water systems. The Municipality developed the Plan following requirements outlined in Ontario regulation 588/17: Asset Management Planning for Municipal Infrastructure. The Municipality of Clarington’s core infrastructure assets hold a replacement value of $1.1 billion as of December 2020. The cost per household for the infrastructure portfolio is $30,691 based on 35,936 households. This report is based on the audited year 2020 , as 2021 was not complete when developing this asset management plan. Based on replacement cost and a blend of age-based and observed data, 83.4 percent of Clarington’s assets are in Fair to Very Good condition. However, 16.6 percent of assets fall into the Poor or Very Poor condition classes and are worth $43 million and $37 million. An overall health grade of ‘A’ has been assigned to our municipality. The asset health grade is only a snapshot in time (December 2020) and doesn’t con sider future asset assumptions or future funding needs to continue adequately maintaining our assets. Clarington’s asset management plan is a living document that will continually be updated and expanded. To ensure that future asset management plans are me aningful and support a strong asset management program, the following items are recommended: • To continually review best practices as they relate to preventative maintenance and rehabilitation strategies to minimize lifecycle costs and maximize asset service life • To build an asset management system that integrates all asset management data into one data source while maintaining asset ownership responsibilities of each department • To continue to develop robust condition assessment programs for all asset categories on a pre-determined schedule to ensure data accuracy and availability of funding • To build a collaborative environment with open lines of communication to ensure that there is a clear line of sight on departmental responsibilities and asset management outcomes. Page 163 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 4 Per regulation O.Reg 588/17, future asset management plans will be presented to Council as follows: • Phase 2 (by July 2024) Asset Management Plan for all municipal assets, including current service levels and costs to maintain these levels • Phase 3 (by July 2025) Builds on Phase 2. The plan shifts from current levels of service to focus on proposed levels of service and related lifecycle management, including financial strategy for all municipal assets. • Phase 4 (by July, starting in 2026), an annual review of asset management planning progress, must be conducted by Council • Phase 5 (starting in the year 2030), a complete asset management plan is conducted and approved by Council every five years. Page 164 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 5 Page 165 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 6 Introduction What is Asset Management? Asset management (AM) is the strategy to realize value from assets, reduce risks and provide the expected level of service to the community in a socially, environmentally, and economically sustainable manner. Effective asset management requires an overarching framework to establish and guide its practice so that asset management becomes central to strategic, financial, and operational decision-making at all levels of the organization. AM includes the planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of infrastructure used to provide services. Infrastructure needs can be prioritized over time by utilizing AM processes while also ensuring timely investments to minimize repair and rehabilitation costs and maintain municipal assets. Key questions municipalities must ask themselves today as they develop their AMPs and programs are the following: • What is the asset worth? • What is the asset’s condition and expected remaining service life? • What is the level of service expectation, and what nee ds to be done? • When do you need to do preventative maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement? • How much will the remedial works cost, and what is the acceptable level of risk(s)? • What is the overall life cycle needs/costs? • What are the long-term sustainable financing needs? Asset Management Plan Purpose Asset management plans are documents developed by the Municipality that specify the activities, resources and timescales required for individual assets or asset classes to achieve a defined level of service objectives. The Plan enables the Municipality to make informed decisions regarding the construction, operation, maintenance, renewal, replacement, expansion, and disposal of infrastructure assets while minimizing risk and cost to the community while maximizing service delivery. The asset management plan is designed to: • Guide the consistent application of standards, best practices and tools • Support effective service delivery through the sustainable management of Clarington’s infrastructure • Align investments with infrastructure priorities to deliver established levels of service in a financially responsible manner • Provide input into long-term infrastructure plans and budgets Page 166 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 7 • Support business cases for crucial infrastructure investments and funding opportunities • Develop sustainable financing plans • Support discussion of establishing levels of service targets • Comply with legislative requirements Corporate Asset Management Plan Overview This Plan, which utilizes data verified as of December 2020, is the initial phase of plans outlined in O.Reg 588/17. The requirement dictated that this initial asset management plan should focus on core infrastructure assets. For Clarington, those asset categories are bridges and culverts, roadways, and stormwater management. This Plan will specify the quantity, quality, and replacement value of those core infrastructure assets , our approach to condition ratings, the current level of service those assets provide, and calculated performance measures to use as a comparison tool in future years. The Plan will then discuss lifecycle activities for those core assets. The lifecycle activities have been analyzed to expose any risk factors and depict which events should occur in the following years, including the associated costs. Asset Management Policy The Municipality of Clarington adopted the Strategic Asset Management Policy (G15) in 2019. The policy outlines Clarington’s commitments and principles that will be considered in asset management planning. It ensures strategic alignment with the Corporation’s vision of building a sustainable, creative, and caring community. This vision requires the alignment of many initiatives, and all existing and planned asset decisions must support the recommended levels of service and our long -term vision for the community. Corporate Asset Management Framework The corporate asset management framework represents the integrated relationship between elements of an effective asset management system and provides a structure for standardization and consistency of asset management practices and pl ans throughout the Municipality. Page 167 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 8 This framework is used to guide the development and implementation of the core infrastructure asset management plans included in this report, and is intended to ensure long-term core asset sustainability, demonstrate a commitment to good stewardship and support improved accountability and transparency to the community. Page 168 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 9 Page 169 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 11 What do we own? What is it worth? An extensive network of infrastructure is operated and maintained by the Municipality to manage storm water runoff. Valued in 2020 dollars at approximately $188,412,973 the storm water infrastructure consists of two asset types – conveyance and management. • The stormwater conveyance network is divided between storm sewer conduits, and storm sewer structures. • Conduits refer to the mainline pipes which the water flows through. • Structures include assets such as catch basins, outlets/inlets, and maintenance holes. • The stormwater management category consists of stormwater management facilities or ponds. The Municipalities ponds are divided into two categories being either wet or dry. • The storm water inventory is updated via letters of assumption for subdivision developments and letters of completion / holdback releases for reconstruction projects. • Inventory is tracked and maintained through both GIS and asset management software. • Clarington owns a total of 260 kilometers of storm sewer lines and 38 Storm water Management Facilities, 37 of which have been contributed by developers. Page 170 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 12 Asset Segment Quantity Replacement Cost Method 2020 Replacement Cost Ponds - Wet 23 70% of historical cost, inflated $ 5,638,662 Ponds - Dry 15 50% of historical cost, inflated 3,074,310 Conduit (km) (Mainline Pipe) 260 Cost Per Unit 129,019,454 Maintenance Holes 4,072 Cost Per Unit 35,987,562 Catch Basins 6,378 Cost Per Unit 13,062,942 Inlet / Outlet Structures 184 Cost Per Unit 244,721 Oil Grit Separators 13 Cost Per Unit 1,238,510 $ 188,266,161 Figure 2.1: Includes the quantity, replacement cost method and total estimated replacement cost for all inventoried storm water assets Estimated replacement costs for conveyance infrastructure is based on average unit costs. The unit costs are reflective of recent network maintenance and reconstruction contract costs. Additional costs to install the infrastructure and external consulting have not been factored in. At the present time it is too difficult to analyze each storm network and predict these costs without a full review of each system. Each system is unique , and costs can vary based on specific locations, depths and required upgrades to pipe sizes for flow capacity. Currently, the Municipality aligns these costs during its capital budget forecasting. As more asset management data becomes available , the Municipality will be better equipped to predict these cost variances. The replacement value for Clarington’s conduit and structures is considered as if this service would be replaced on a complete standalone basis. Clarington’s current process is coordinating the replacement of stormwater management infrastructure with the replacement of our road network or the Region of Durham's sanitary water infrastructure. This coordination ensures cost efficiencies during reconstruction projects while maintaining the current level of service at the lowest cost. While the core infrastructure of the stormwater management system and the road network system are presented separately, often the two coincide when considering their replacement needs. Page 171 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 13 Estimated replacement costs for the storm water Management facilities are based on a percentage of the historical asset cost, 100 percent inflated to 2020 dollars. Historical costs were derived from development costs from assumed subdivisions. It has been determined that only 70 percent of a wet pond and 50 percent of a dry stormwater pond will be considered a replaceable asset. Clarington concluded that there is a percentage of work required during initial construction to establish the infrastructure that will not be needed again when the assets are replaced. Useful life Clarington’s linear stormwater management conveyance network consists of assets built using various materials. Current industry standards typically use concrete material for conduits and structures, but some older assets still exist in the inventory constructed using asbestos cement and vitrified clay. These older assets have been given an estimated useful life of 40 years. Although few of these assets still exist, the ones that do have been deemed to still be in fair condition. These assets make up 1.2 percent or 3.4 kilometres of the entire inventory and have been scheduled to be replaced when their respective road networks are reconstructed in the near future. Conduits and structures that have been constructed using concrete cement or Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) have been given useful lives of 75 years and represent 98.8 percent, the vast majority of Clarington’s stormwater inventory. Clarington’s stormwater management ponds are relatively new (the first one built in approximately 1988) and are expected to have long useful lives. The useful life of 75 years is considered appropriate per industry standards before the facilities would require extensive reconstruction works. These assets are much easier to inspect and maintain, unlike the underground network. In 2017, Clarington initiated a stormwater management capital maintenance program to provide cleanout and rehabilitation works to some of the aging assets. Rather than extend the facilities' estimated useful life, the required work has been necessary to ensure the assets meet their expected end -of-life cycles. Page 172 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 14 Figure 2.2: Average Age as a Proportion of Average Useful Life of Clarington’s Storm Water Management Assets 75 75 75 75 75 23 26 20 22 22 0 15 30 45 60 75 Avg of All Stormwater Assets SWM Pond Dry SWM Pond Wet Structures Conduit Expected Useful Life Average Age Asset Segment Estimated Useful Life (Yrs) Avg Age (Yrs) Projected Service Life Remaining (Yrs) % Of Assets with More Than Half EUL Remaining % Of Assets with Less Than Half EUL Remaining Storm Water Ponds – Wet 75 19.9 55.1 100% 0% Storm Water Ponds - Dry 75 25.6 49.4 100% 0% Conduit (Concrete) 75 22.3 52.7 90.30% 9.70% Conduit (Asbestos Cement/Clay) 40 43.5 0 31.30% 68.70% Structures 75 19.9 55.1 91.30% 8.70% Totals 22.6 52.4 Figure 2.3: Shows the useful life, the average age, projected service life remaining and the percentage of assets which are below halfway through their estimated useful life and over halfway through their estimated useful life for each asset segment. Page 173 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 15 The age for Clarington’s conveyance network, which are contributed by developers, is based on when assets are assumed from the developers and Clarington takes over ownership. Age for assets that fall within Clarington’s capital urban development and reconstruction programs are based on the construction year of substantial completion. The average age of the Municipalities storm water network is 22.6 years. Considering an industry-standard useful life of 75 years Clarington’s storm water network, aside from the small percentage of assets made using asbestos cement and vitrified clay, is relatively young. Only a small portion of conveyance assets have exceeded half their useful life, and to date, no stormwater management pond has reached its halfway useful life point. Due to the reasonable age of the storm network assets, it has been decided to project service life for this asset class based on age rather than condition. It has yet to be determined, but as assets age and inspection data becomes more available , it is possible Clarington may begin assigning an assessed condition rating to the older infrastructure. It can then be determined whether the assessed conditions will increase or decrease the average service life remaining for each specific asset. Figure 2.4: Required 2020 replacement costs for the total inventoried stormwater network in 10-year age intervals. $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 $55 $60 1951-1960 1961-1970 1971-1980 1981-1990 1991-2000 2001-2010 2011-2020Total Funding Requirement - $Mil 2020 Estimated Replacement Cost per 10 Year Asset Age Grouping (Includes All Storm Water Infrastructure) Page 174 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 16 Asset Condition In this asset management plan, age has been used to determine the condition of the storm network conduit and structures. Internal staff inspection data has been used to assess the condition of the stormwater management facilities. The age-based condition measure is a percentage of the estimated useful life consumed based on each asset’s age and the average life expectancy based on industry standards. Below is the scale which Clarington is currently using for stormwater conveyance assets and aged based condition rating: Condition Rating Age (Yrs) Grade Category Description 80-100 1-15 A Very Good The assets are functioning as intended with little if any deterioration. 60-80 16-30 B Good The assets are functioning as intended. Still, little deterioration is expected. No maintenance is forecasted for conduits, but some structures may require minor maintenance. 40-60 31-45 C Fair The assets are functioning as intended. Normal deterioration and distress may be identified. Conduit maintenance is possible in the forecasted future. Structures not already maintained will require maintenance to maintain functionality. 20-40 46-60 D Poor Some assets are starting not to function as intended. Deterioration and significant distress likely identified. Further maintenance and repair work are required for both conduits and structures to restore functionality. 0-20 61-75 E Very Poor The assets are not functioning as intended. Significant deterioration and major distress identified. Assets require immediate attention and likely replacement in the short-term future. Figure 2.5: Clarington's scale for age-based stormwater asset condition assessments. Table includes condition rating, asset age category, condition grading, and the description of each specific condition category. Page 175 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 17 Clarington’s current process, as mentioned above, is to coordinate the replacement of the conveyance infrastructure with the replacement of the road network infrastructure and the Region of Durham's sanitary water infrastructure. This ensures various cost efficiencies can be realized while maintaining the desired levels of service. Therefore Clarington’s current practice is to inspect the underground infrastructure when the road network reconstruction life cycle schedules occur or when the Region of Durham plans upgrades to their underground assets. Clarington’s urban and non-rural roads where underground infrastructure resides are typically fully reconstructed after 60 years. Assuming the stormwater infrastructure was constructed in and around the original road base and surface were constructed, at 60 years, the storm network will have reached the poor condition category. As stated in the previous table, this is when we can anticipate some assets have started not to function as intended. The infrastructure is inspected in and around this time using closed-circuit television (CCTV). If warranted, major repairs and replacements to the storm network can be scheduled for when the rest of the road network is already under construction. Referring to figure 2.3, Clarington’s stormwater infrastructure that is not made from asbestos cement or vitirfied clay has an average age of 22.3 years for conduit and 19.9 years for structures. Clarington’s Public Works Department has determined that, considering the average age of the infrastructure, at this time, it is not recommended to perform a full CCTV inspection of the entire 260km network. The costs to do so can not be justified considering that the infrastructure is, on average, in good to very good condition and is initially inspected upon assumption from the developers. This methodology will continue to be used for the foreseeable future until Public Works feels the network has reached an age that a full inspection can be justified and budget allows for that increase to be created. Conversely, an annual inspection program has been fully implemented for all 38 stormwater management facilities the Municipality owns. Unlike CCTV inspections, Public Works staff can do inspections of the facilities at little expense other than staff time and wages. The inspection program has helped identify deficiencies and ensures issues are corrected before a failure or reduction to service level occurs. Without inspecting the assets, it can not be guaranteed the ponds are functioning a s their designs were intended. Ensuring the functionality of the storm water ponds benefits the Municipality in many ways, such as aiding in safeguarding public health, reducing flooding potential for public and private lands and demonstrating due diligen ce for sound asset management principles. Page 176 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 18 Below is the scale in which Clarington is currently using for storm water facility inspection assesed condition ratings: Condition Rating Grade Category Description 80-100 A Very Good The assets are functioning as intended, with little repairs to the facility required. 60-80 B Good The assets are functioning as intended. Still, very little repairs are necessary other than minor maintenance. Sediment buildup may be beginning. 40-60 C Fair The assets are beginning not to function as intended. Routine repairs and sediment buildup likely. Facility should be monitored for cleanout works. 20-40 D Poor Most assets are not functioning as intended. Significant repairs are needed. Sediment removal and erosion work’s need to be considered. 0-20 E Very Poor The assets are not functioning as intended. Assets require immediate attention and repair to avoid public health and safety concerns. Figure 2.6: Clarington's scale for inspection-based stormwater facility condition assessments. Table includes condition rating, condition grading, and each specific condition category description. Page 177 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 19 Overall the Municipalities conveyance assets are in good condition (B Grade). • Overall Conduit Average: 69.7 percent • Overal Structure Average: 69.4 percent 30.1%29.8% 38.5%39.5% 69.7%69.4% 23.8%23.1% 7.1%3.6% 0.4% 4.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Conduit Structures Average of all Conduit Average of all Structures Very Good Good Figure 2.7: Storm water Conduit and Structure aged based assessed condition ratings • Of the 0.4 percent of conduit assessed in very poor condition, 21 percent of the assets have been included in the capital budget forecasts within the next four years. • Of the 4 percent of structures assessed in very poor condition, 69 percent of the assets have been included in the capital budget forecasts within the next four years • The remaining conveyance assets assessed in very poor condition and not forecasted for replacement, 64 percent of those assets have been CCTV inspected and deemed to still be in fair condition, whereas they do not require replacement within the curren t 5-year capital forecast. Page 178 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 20 • All remaining non-inspected conduit & structure assets assessed in poor condition will be inspected in the future operating budgets to determine their remaining useful lives related to our required levels of service. Overall the Municipality’s Storm water Management facilities are in very good condition (A Grade). • Overall Storm water Wet Pond Average Condition: 84 percent • Overall Conduit Average: 86.3 percent 73.9%73.3% 26.1%20.0% 84.0%86.3% 6.7% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0% Wet Ponds Dry Ponds Average of all Wet Ponds Average of all Dry Ponds Very Good Good Figure 2.8: Storm water Wet and Dry Pond inspection based assessed condition ratings • The 6.7 percent of facilities in fair condition equates to one storm water pond. This pond has received is forecasted for cleaning and sediment removal in 2022. • In 2022, Clarington will be pursuing an update to the storm water Management Master Plan. Once completed, the plan will better outline scheduling priorities for pond cleanout and sediment removal. Page 179 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 21 Roads What do we own? What is it worth? The Municipality of Clarington’s road network consists of critical components to provide safe and efficient transportation service throughout our community. The road network includes all municipality-owned and managed roadways which provide support for roadside infrastructure. The Public Works Department is responsible for managing operational and rehabilitation processes for all our road infrastructure while managing the increased costs of a high-growth municipality. • Under the Municipal Act, 2001, Clarington is required to collect and manage road infrastructure within the Municipality. • Clarington’s road network is assessed on a bi-annual basis by an external agency with the expertise for road assessment. • Operational maintenance procedures utilized in our municipality include patching, grading, sweeping, ditching, as well as winter maintenance (sanding, salting, and plowing). • Capital procedures in our municipality include design and construction of new roads, major rehabilitation activities, crack sealing, asphalt resurfacing, and reconstruction. The Municipality of Clarington provides a sustainable transportation system through our community by operating and maintaining a comprehensive road network . The road network is valued at approximately $714,628,356 in 2020 dollars, consisting of two asset types – surface and base. • Clarington staff are continuously working towards improving the accuracy and reliability of the Road Network inventory so it can be better used for long-term asset management planning. Page 180 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 22 • Clarington’s road surface network is divided between two categories: paved and unpaved roads. • Paved roads include the various levels of road surface assets, such as high class bituminous and low class bituminous. • High class bituminous (HCB) surface is divided by four levels that is determined by the average daily traffic and the asphalt depth. • Low class bituminous (LCB) roads are lower grade local paved roads, utilized in more rural areas. • Unpaved roads consist of two categories, earth, and gravel roads. • The road network inventory is updated via letters of assumption for subdivision or commercial developments and holdback releases for reconstruction projects managed by Clarington. • Clarington’s road inventory is controlled through both GIS and asset management software. • Clarington owns a total of 811 kilometers of paved roads and 105 kilometers of unpaved roads. Page 181 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 23 Asset Category Asset Segment Quantity (Km) Historical Cost 2020 Replacement Costs Unpaved Roads Earth Roads 40 $0 $0 Gravel Roads 65 0 3,533,854 Paved Roads-Surface High Class Bituminous 1 (HCB-1) 1 545,171 410,000 High Class Bituminous 2 (HCB-2) 4 1,220,712 1,838,975 High Class Bituminous 3 (HCB-3) 164 33,510,196 53,390,675 High Class Bituminous 4 (HCB-4) 259 39,534,113 84,393,260 Low Class Bituminous (LCB) 366 19,933,503 32,555,250 Roads Base Roads Base 914 224,808,241 538,506,342 Total $319,551,936 $714,628,356 Figure 2.9: Includes the quantity, total historical cost and total estimated replacement cost for all inventoried road assets Road infrastructure utilizes a calculated average unit cost to determine the estimated replacement costs. The unit costs are developed based on current unit pricing provided from Clarington’s 2019 State of Infrastructure for Roads, with our Engineering (now Page 182 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 24 Public Works Department Infrastructure Division) staff providing valuation splits for base and surface amounts. The State of Infrastructure report provides the detailed information required for the assessment of Clarington’s entire road network while stating the needed improvements for each of Clarington’s road infrastructure. The replacement costs do not incorporate upgrade plans for road infrastructure to increase the pavement quality level. These costs provide the estimated values for rehabilitating the existing pavement level. Currently, the Municipality aligns costs of connecting rehabilitation projects during its capital budget forecasting to achieve the optimal use of annual budgets. As more asset management data becomes available , the Municipality will continue to improve the prediction of cost variances. Historical costs were derived from two processes: development costs from assumed subdivisions or capital costs allocated to assets during addition to Tangible Capital Assets at project completion. Clarington’s unpaved roads do not have a historical cost due to the timing and nature of these assets in the inventory. The earth roads are not constructed roads, therefore, they do not have a historical cost and require minimal to no reconstruction. Useful life Clarington’s road network consists of assets built using various pavement standards for traffic requirements. Current industry standards typically use higher grades of asphalt. Functional classification systems are developed by a collaboration of a number of agencies that include the Transportation Association of Canada and the Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO). These classifications serve a purpose, but the results vary significantly in terms of performance, replacement and treatment costs. Providing additional parameters based on surface type, depth and traffic volume would improve the pavement performance models. Clarington’s road base infrastructure is expected to have long useful lives of 60 years. The road base’s reaching the expected useful lives is dependent on the surface condition and the efficiency of lifecycle events. The useful life of road surface fluctuates with different traffic needs and usage. Increased pavement grades and depths are used to handle weight requirements and vehicle volumes. For most Clarington’s roads, a Page 183 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 25 useful life of 30 years is considered appropriate per industry standards before the pavement requires extensive reconstruction . External consultants produce a report that provides an in-depth analysis of Clarington’s entire road network every two years. The report details the current lifecycle requirements for all roads in Claringto n. The age of Clarington’s Road network is based on municipal capital programs for new and reconstruction that are assumed at the construction year of substantial completion. Clarington takes ownership of contributed road assets in the year of development acceptance. Figure 2.10: Average Age as a Proportion of Average Useful Life of Clarington’s Road Network Infrastructure 60 30 30 30 30 20 25 12 27 18 19 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 BASE HCB-1 HCB-2 HCB-3 HCB-4 LCB Expected Useful Life Average Age Page 184 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 26 Asset Category Estimated Useful Life (Yrs) Avg Age (Yrs) Projected Service Life Remaining (Yrs) % Of Assets with More Than Half EUL Remaining % Of Assets with Less Than Half EUL Remaining LCB 20 14.2 5.8 48.4% 51.6% HCB-4 30 18.6 11.4 37.1% 62.9% HCB-3 30 17.8 12.2 48.0% 52.0% HCB-2 30 26.8 3.2 22.7% 77.3% HCB-1 30 11.8 18.2 100.0% 0.0% BASE 60 25.1 34.9 63.3% 36.7% Figure 2.11: Shows the useful life, the average age, projected service life remaining and the percentage of assets which are below half-way through their estimated useful life and over halfway through their estimated useful life for each asset segment. The expected useful life of the different High-Class Bituminous (HCB) asphalt surface roads is 30 years. The HCB road asphalt surface replacement is estimated to be required twice during the useful life of the road base. Low-Class Bituminous (LCB) surface roadways have a slightly shorter expected useful life of 20 years and are expected to be replaced three times during the life of the road base. The road surface network, shown in figure 3, currently has the majority of assets with less than 50 percent remaining in their expected useful life. This information determines that most of the road surfaces in Clarington are in the later stages of life expectancy. The average age of Clarington’s road base infrastructure is 25.1 years. Considering the standard useful life of 60 years, most road base assets have not exceeded half their useful life. Having 63.3 percent of road base assets with more than half of the remaining useful life left, indicates that the majority of road surfaces are nearing the first reconstruction based on their useful lives. Page 185 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 27 $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 $55 $60 $65 1971-1980 1981-1990 1991-2000 2001-2010 2011-2020Millions2020 Estimated Replacement Cost per 10 Year Asset Age Grouping (Road Surface Infrastructure) • Figure 2.12: Required 2020 replacement costs for the total inventoried road surface network in 10-year age intervals. $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 1961-1970 1971-1980 1981-1990 1991-2000 2001-2010 2011-2020Millions2020 Estimated Replacement Cost per 10 Year Asset Age Grouping (Road Base Infrastructure) Figure 2.13: Required 2020 replacement costs for the total inventoried road base network in 10-year age intervals. Page 186 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 28 Asset Condition Clarington utilizes physical condition assessments for road surface assets in this asset management plan, which is more accurate for roads than an age -based condition approach. Due to road infrastructure condition fluctuations from many factors, the roadways do not always follow a straight-line deterioration that an age-based method provides. These factors have caused staff to determine that physical condition assessments are the optimal condition valuation for Clarington’s road surface network. Road base infrastructure does not receive a physical condition assessment because of the direct correlation with the road's surface. The age-based condition measure is a percentage of the estimated useful life consumed based on each asset’s age and the average life expectancy based on industry standards. Below is the scale which Clarington is currently using for Road network assets condition rating: Condition Rating Grade Category Image example of Road Condition 75-100 A Very Good Roads within this category may show surface distress for up to 10% of the length. The required maintenance effort may be slightly above average but not uneconomical compared to the reconstruction costs. 60-74 B Good Roads within this category show surface distress from 11% to 15% of the length. Similar to the Very Good level, required maintenance may be above average but not necessarily uneconomical compared to the cost of a full reconstruction. Page 187 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 29 Condition Rating Grade Category Image example of Road Condition 40-59 C Fair Roads show surface distress from 16% to 20% of the length, and the required maintenance effort is high. 20-39 D Poor Roads show surface distress of more than 20% of the length, and the required maintenance effort is excessive 0-19 E Very Poor These roads have exceeded their expected useful life and do not meet the road requirements. Roads within this category is not necessarily the highest priority for asset management or return on investment perspectives Figure 2.14: Clarington’s scale for road condition assessments. Table includes condition rating, condition grading, and the description of each specific condition category . Page 188 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 30 Overall the Municipality’s Paved Road Surface assets are in GOOD condition (B Grade). • Overall Paved Road Surface Average Condition: 69.4 percent • Overal Road Base Average Condition: 58.2 percent Figure 2.15: Paved Road Surface condition assessment ratings by road type and road lengths in kilometres Road Category Very Good Good Fair Poor Critical Total Km’s HCB-1 0.20 0.62 0.82 HCB-2 1.08 0.39 2.02 0.85 4.34 HCB-3 108.38 17.19 21.73 14.46 2.53 164.29 HCB-4 154.30 22.17 45.75 26.41 10.40 259.03 LCB 117.05 41.38 56.00 121.80 25.50 361.73 Totals 380.81 81.33 125.50 164.14 38.43 790.21 % Of Inventory 48% 10% 16% 21% 5% 100% Page 189 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 31 25% 66% 60% 32%37% 24% 9% 10% 9% 11% 20% 47% 13% 18% 15% 24% 76% 20% 9%10% 34% 14% 2% 2%4%7%4% 98% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% HCB-1 HCB-2 HCB-3 HCB-4 LCB - High Float Gravel Earth Very Good Good Fair Poor Critical Figure 2.16: Road Surface assessed condition ratings as a percentage • Of the two percent of HCB-3 Road Surfaces assessed in critical condition, 76 percent of the assets have been included in the capital budget forecasts within the next five years. • Of the four percent of HCB-4 Road Surfaces assessed in critical condition , 34 percent of the assets have been included in the capital budget forecasts within the next five years. • Unpaved gravel roads are rehabilitated with Clarington’s gravel road program. This program completes the annual maintenance processes required to maintain our current level of service for these roads. This includes grading, Page 190 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 32 dragging, and ditching of these roads. These roads do not require additional rehabilitation capital costs for proper operations. • All earth roads require minimal maintenance or reconstruction events and do not require a replacement cost because they are not constructed road infrastructure. • All remaining road assets assessed in poor condition will be inspected in the following State of Road Infrastructure to determine their remaining useful lives related to our required level of service. Page 191 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 33 Bridges & Culverts What do we own? What is it worth? The Municipality of Clarington operates and maintains bridges and culverts , which enable safe and effective travel. The Public Works Department is responsible for planning and managing this critical infrastructure. The Municipality of Clarington currently has 123 bridge assets, including 24 pedestrian bridges and 149 culvert assets in its inventory. The 272 structures have a total replacement cost of $200,020,200. • Under the Municipal Act, 2001, Clarington shall keep its bridges and culverts in a state of repair that is reasonable in the circumstances, including the character and location of the bridge or culvert. • The Municipality considers the risk of flooding and erosion when prioritizing which structures will be repaired or replaced. • Bridge condition scores are developed and are used to guide repairs, rehabilitation, and replacement schedules. • Public Works Infrastructure Division has a ten- year rehabilitation forecast for bridges and culverts as determined by findings in the inspections. • The Municipality must plan for future expansion and required needs due to community growth and changing transportation modes. Page 192 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 34 King Street East Bridge (Bowmanville, On) • A bridge is a structure which provides a roadway or walkway for the passage of vehicles, pedestrians or cyclists across an obstruction, gap or facility and is greater than or equal to 3 metres in span. • A culvert is a structure that forms an opening through soil for the passage of water, vehicles or pedestrians/ cyclists and has a span of 3 metres or more . • A pedestrian bridge enables pedestrians to cross wet, fragile, or marshy land s and railways. • The Bridge and Culvert inventory is divided into the following segments: Bridges - C - Cast in Place, Bridges - P - Precast Concrete, Bridges - S – Steel, Bridges - T - Timber/Wood, Culverts, and Pedestrian Bridges • Out of the 99 bridge assets only two (2.02 percent) of these require a load restriction. These bridge assets are identified as 094024 at Jackman Rd and 099045 at Holt Rd. The table below includes the quantity, replacement cost method and total estimated replacement cost for all inventoried bridges and culverts Page 193 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 35 Asset Segment Quantity (each) Replacement Cost Method 2020 Replacement Cost Bridges - C - Cast in Place 80 Utilized the technical expertise of GHD consultants to value the replacement costs of the assets. *See exclusions below $65,386,000 Bridges – P- Precast Concrete 13 46,098,236 Bridges - S - Steel 4 4,973,124 Bridges - T - Timber/Wood 2 1,221,405 Culverts 149 77,365,179 Pedestrian Bridges 24 4,976,256 TOTAL 272 $200,020,200 Figure 2.17: Bridge and culvert age and replacement cost *The following assets have replacement costs based on CPI tables as they were excluded in the GHD inspections but included in the above table Asset Segment Bridge 2020 Replacement Cost Bridges - C - Cast in Place 094003 West Beach Rd $318,061 098057 – Conc B, Clarke 656,889 098095 – Conc7/8, Clarke 41,851 099127 – Conc 8, Darlington 324,681 099517 – Liberty St 115,567 Bridges – P- Precast Concrete 094013 – Bowmanville Creek Bridge 1,768,139 Culverts 098052 – Lakeshore Rd 110,304 098512 – Conc 1, Clarke 82,005 098544 – Conc 7/8, Clarke 51,056 099091 – Conc 5/6 Darlington 238,374 099501 – Conc BF, Darlington 230,556 098553 – Stephenson Rd 467,802 Pedestrian Bridges Lions Memorial 29,313 Figure 2.18: Bridge and culvert exclusions Page 194 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 36 Figure 2.19: Bridge and culvert locations on aerial map of Clarington Page 195 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 37 The replacement costs used are calculated by GHD as a part of the Municipal Structure Inventory and Inspection 2020. In addition to the base cost of physically constructing the structure itself, a variety of associated costs have also been included in the total replacement cost of each bridge. The associated costs include: • An allowance to address temporary or permanent utility relocations varied by roadside environment to include $57,000 for utility-related works in an urban environment, $31,000 in a semi-urban environment and $23,000 in a rural area. • An allowance for the construction of bridge approaches is calculated based on the width of the approaching roadways. A unit rate of $13,000/m of road width is utilized based on the assumption that the average length of approach works will be 25 m on both sides of the structure. • An engineering allowance to address approvals, design and contract administration costs associated with the structure's construction. The engineering allowance has been calculated as 20 percent of the construction cost including estimated approach and utility works. • A contingency allowance of 15 percent to address other minor cost factors not accounted for in the base cost. It should be noted that the current replacement value (CRV) figure is a benchmark- based estimate that relies on the geometry and design of the existing structure to arrive at estimated replacement costs. The costs are intended primarily for comparing the general value of various structures to one another and should be considered primarily as an order of magnitude values. In planning a complete replacement of a structure , specific consideration should be given to additional costs that may arise from various current design considerations. Examples of such considerations include: • Need to widen the structure to accommodate increased traffic. • Need to lengthen the structure to eliminate wall style abutments and replace with stub abutments set further back from watercourses • Costs associated with the potential need for the staging of construction, traffic control and detours. • Costs associated with complex removal operations to dispose of the existing structure. Page 196 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 38 Useful life The table below outlines the useful life by structure type Asset Useful Life Bridge – Constructed prior to year 2000 50 Years Bridge – Constructed after year 2000 75 Years Culvert 75 Years Pedestrian Bridge 75 Years Figure 2.20: Bridge and culvert useful life expectancy The average age of the Municipality’s bridges is 43 years old. The following bridges have an age greater than 80 years old. It is a reasonable assumption that these historical bridges have been regularly rehabilitated since their original construction, and as the condition assessments show, they are in good condition. Structure ID Location Age of Structure (Yrs) 098015 Conc. 2/3, Clark 90 099077 Conc 2, Darlington 80 098023 Conc 3, Clarke 85 099516 Conc 3, Darlington 90 098059 Conc B/I, Clarke 90 099521 Conc 5/6, Darlington 90 098530 Conc 6, Clarke 90 099534 Conc 7, Darlington 92 Figure 2.21: Bridge assets with age greater than 80 years The average age of Clarington’s culverts is 40 years old. The following culverts have an age greater than 80 years old. It is a reasonable assumption that these culverts have been regularly rehabilitated since their original construction, and as the condition assessments show, they are in good condition Structure ID Location Age of Structure (Yrs) 093504 North St 86 098503 Conc B Clarke 91 095502 Leigh St 91 Figure 2.22: Culvert assets with an age greater than 40 years The average age of the Municipality of Clarington’s pedestrian bridges is 16 years old. All the pedestrian bridges are below 40 years old and are in acceptable condition. Page 197 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 39 Number of Structures by Age 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 60 TO 70 0 TO 10 40 TO 50 50 TO 60 20 TO 30 90 TO 100 70 TO 80 80 TO 90 30 TO 40 10 TO 20 Years Bridge Culverts Pedestrian Bridge Figure 2.23: Number of bridge and culvert assets by age Asset Condition The Bridge Condition Index (BCI) is calculated based on the weighted sum of the condition of various structure components and is a number between zero and 100, with higher numbers corresponding to a better condition. Page 198 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 40 The structure prioritization number (SPN) is calculated using the condition of the structure (the BCI) and other factors, including traffic, the value of the structure, cost of repairs, load posting limitations, performance deficiencies and detour length. The SPN is also a number between 0 and 100, corresponding with a higher priority for repair/replacement. BCI and SPN are described in more detail in the Municipal Structure Inventory and Inspection report. Bridge condition scores are developed and are used to guide repairs, rehabilitation, and replacement schedules. The Municipality continues to maintain a good condition rating for bridges and culverts. Of the 268 Bridges and Culverts recorded in the Municipality’s asset listing, 70 percent are in Very Good – Good condition. Only 19 percent are considered in Poor – Very Poor condition based on the BCI values. As per the Ministry of Transportation guidelines, a condition of 70 and above would result in no work needed in the next five years, 60 t o 70 would have work in the next five years, and anything below 60 would require work within the following year. The following table outlines the BCI Ratings from Very Good to Very Poor Bridge and Culvert Condition Index Rating Asset Condition Grade System – Bridges and Culverts GRADE CONDITION RANGE (BCI) Very Good >80 Good 70 to 79.9 Fair 65 to 69.9 Poor 60 to 64.9 Very Poor 0 to 59.9 Figure 2.24: Outlines BCI ratings from very good to very poor Bridges and Culverts Condition Figure 2.25: Outlines the number of bridges and culverts per condition category Asset Category Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor Unknown Bridges 13 58 11 8 8 1 Culverts 25 72 17 7 27 1 Pedestrian Bridges 9 9 1 0 2 2 Totals 47 139 29 15 37 4 % Of Inventory 17% 51% 11% 6% 14% 1% Page 199 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 41 The following was completed by GHD during the 2020 Municipal Structure Inventory and Inspection, which outlines the results of field inspection investigations 1. A visual re-inspection for deficiencies and recording of any relevant dimensions. 2. An updated photographic inventory of the structure's appearance and deficiencies. 3. The compilation of the field review using Worktech Asset Foundation Software. 4. An individual assessment of the condition and state of repair/n on-repair of each structure and the recommendation of improvements and estimated costs to bring the existing structure to an acceptable level of service. 5. Recommendation of the feasible options and cost-effectiveness of maintaining the existing structure versus possible replacement and the costs and timing of the same. 6. Calculation of the Current Replacement Value (CRV), Bridge Condition Index (BCI), and Structure Prioritization Number (SPN) for each structure. Based on the Structure Prioritization Values (SPN), relative rankings of bridge and culvert needs have been provided based on the Structure Prioritization Values (SPN). 7. Identification of specific budget recommendations for detailed condition surveys and bridge rehabilitation/replacement, including associated engineering design and supervision and construction estimates. The table below shows the percentage of structures with a Structure Priority Number (SPN) under 25 and an SPN between 25-50. Currently, Clarington has no structures with a SPN higher than 50. This information will be tracked over time in hopes of reducing the percentages of structures with a higher SPN value. Percentage of Bridge and Culverts with a SPN Less Than 50% Structure Type SPN Value < 25 >25 and < 50 > 50 Bridge 44% 56% 0% Culvert 20% 80% 0% Pedestrian Bridge 62% 38% 0% Figure 2.26: Summarizes the percentage of assets within various SPN ranges Page 200 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 42 The detour length factor is included to represent the disruption and inconvenience that may result if a structure were to have to undergo complete replacement of a lengthy major rehabilitation that may limit or preclude traffic from travelling over or unde r the structure. The detour length is measured as the distance required to travel from one side of the structure by circumventing it on similar or higher functional classification roads. For example, the detour length around a structure located on an arterial road would be measured along other arterial roads, although local or collector roads in the detour route may shorten it. The calculated average detour rate for bridge and culvert assets, are as follows: • Bridges is 6.78 kilometres • Culverts is 6.65 kilometres Page 201 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 43 Page 202 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 44 Levels of Service Storm Water Management Current Level of Service Ontario regulation 588/17 requires that levels of service use qualitative and technical descriptions to describe the quality of service delivered by the stormwater management assets in the Municipality. A combination of mapping and metrics have been provided to illustrate the service levels provided by the infrastructure. Figure 3.1 shows the qualitative descriptions and technical metrics required in O.Reg 588/17 for stormwater management assets. Service Attribute Community Levels of Service (Qualitative Descriptions) Technical levels of service (technical metrics) Scope Description, which may include maps, of the user groups or areas of the municipality that are protected from flooding, including the extent of the protection provided by the municipal storm water management system. 1. Percentage of properties in municipality resilient to a 100-year storm. 2. Percentage of the municipal storm water management system resilient to a 5-year storm. Figure 3.1: O.Reg 588/17 Stormwater Management Levels of Service Requirements To fulfill the requirement in O.Reg 588/17 , two separate studies were undertaken. The first study, required to meet the “Percentage of properties in municipality resilient to a 100-year storm” requirement, was prepared internally by the Municipality’s Planning and Development Services Department. Using GIS with municipal, conservation authority and provincial data, every property in Clarington was assigned to one of five categories. Each property was assigned its category based on its proximity within flood mapping and flood damage centres. Additionally, property resilience was further refined based on whether the property has buildings within the flood mapping or was owned by a public agency. The detailed methodology can be viewed within the attached report from Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA). Resilience Properties Percentage Area: acres Resilient 33,634 91.5% 33,176 Mostly Resilient 1,588 4.3% 20,203 Some Resilience 90 0.2% 1,151 Little Resilience 839 2.3% 4,529 Not Resilient 620 1.7% 1,195 Total 36,771 100% 60,255 Figure 3.2: Resilience of all properties in Clarington to a 100-year storm event Page 203 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 45 As shown in Figure 3.2, the results of this study indicate that 91.5 percent of Clarington’s properties are resilient to a 100 -year storm event. Furthermore, 95.8 percent of properties in Clarington are resilient and mostly resilient; this equates to approximately 35,222 of Clarington’s parcels. Clarington’s urb an and rural areas are similarly represented in resilience , as 96 percent of urban properties are resilient or mostly resilient, and 94 percent of rural properties are considered resilient or mostly resilient. In Clarington, 4.2 percent or 1,549 parcels are considered to have some, little or no resilience to a 100-year storm event. Properties considered to have some, little or no resilience are 4 percent of urban properties and 6 percent of the rural properties. Resilience Category Variables Resilient Property is not within flood mapping. Mostly Resilient Property is within flood mapping and not within a flood damage center. Property is municipally, or conservation authority owned, is vacant or has no buildings in the flood mapping. Some Resilience Property is within flood mapping and not within a flood damage center. Property has buildings in the flood mapping. Little Resilience Property is within flood mapping and a flood damage centre. Property is municipally, or conservation authority owned, is vacant or has no buildings in the flood mapping Not Resilient Property is within flood mapping and a flood damage centre. Property has buildings in the flood damage centre. Figure 3.3: Resilience categories and variables. Page 204 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 46 The resilience of a Clarington property to a 100 -year storm event can be described as its vulnerability to such an event, if subjected to an event, the risks the event poses to a property and its ability to adapt to those risks. Clarington's two conservation authorities completed the work of assigning the vulnerability, likelihood, and impact in their flood risk assessment work. The results of this work are the identification of flood damage centres based on a determined level of flood risk to people and property. Flood damage centres are clusters of highly vulnerable buildings to a flood event. Properties in these flood damage centres have the lowest resilience to a 100 -year storm. Many properties within these areas may not have buildings in the flood damage centre, in which case, they have more resilience. Properties not within a flood damage centre but within the flood extents of a 100 -year storm have more resilience than those in a flood damage center. Those properties without buildings in the flood extent have increased resilience as well. Properties owned by the Municipality, the Region of Durham or a conservation authority are generally interpreted as having increased resilience as adaptive measures are generally taken on these properties. Properties not within the flood extents of a 100-year flood are considered resilient to a 100-year storm. Figure 3.4 shows the mapping of the geographic locations within Clarington for the five resilience categories. Each property shows its resilience category to the full boundaries of the property, not just the portion in the flood mapping or flood damage center. Page 205 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 47 Figure 3.4: Map outlining Municipal Properties resiliency to a 100-year storm event. The second study, to meet the requirement of “Percentage of the municipal storm water management system resilient to a 5 -year storm”, was prepared by the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. The conservation authority’s jurisdiction resides within Clarington’s municipal limits. Ganaraska’s authority also encompasses other neighbouring towns and municipalities, some of which Ganaraska had already provided similar studies for in the past. Page 206 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 48 This partnership involved supplying the conservation authority with sufficient storm sewer data to allow their engineers to assess and model Clarington’s networks. This data included shape files for outlets, structures, catch basins, conduits and sub catchment areas, and limits of subdivisions, storm water pond locations, and drainage areas. The methodology, data limitations and the criteria used for analysis can all be reviewed within the 2021 Clarington Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report . After reviewing the data, it was determined that the Municipality of Clarington’s storm sewer network included approximately 171 individual storm sewer systems. Engineers from both parties agreed that by conservative assumption, only systems pre-dating 1985 would be modelled for the purposes of the study. The likelihood of a system constructed after 1985 not using the 5-year storm standard would be relatively small and not worth the resources to model. After refining Clarington’s storm sewer network for systems pre -dating 1985 it was determined that approximately 33 storm systems required analysis and modelling. It is noted that some systems have undergone partial replacements over the years. If a particular system still included at least one asset pre-dating 1985, the entire system was analyzed and run through the model. Figure 3.5 below shows the number of systems modelled for each urban area of Clarington where storm water infrastructure resides. Community Number of Storm Systems Modelled Bowmanville 19 Courtice 3 Hampton 4 Newcastle 1 Orono 6 Total 33 Figure 3.5: The distribution of analyzed systems within the communities of the Municipality The distribution of pre-1985 storm sewer systems within the study area is depicted in red in Figure 3.6 below. Page 207 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 49 Figure 3.6: The distribution of pre-1985 storm sewer systems within the study area Storm Sewer System Summary <80% Capacity 80-100% Capacity >100% Capacity Total Conduits Bowmanville Conduit Modelled 642 70 81 793 Conduit Assumed After 1985 1,602 0 0 1,602 Totals 2,244 70 81 2,395 Burketon Conduit Modelled 0 0 0 0 Conduit Assumed After 1985 1 0 0 1 Totals 1 0 0 1 Courtice Conduit Modelled 29 2 1 32 Page 208 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 50 Storm Sewer System Summary <80% Capacity 80-100% Capacity >100% Capacity Total Conduits Conduit Assumed After 1985 1,457 0 0 1,457 Totals 1,486 2 1 1,489 Hampton Conduit Modelled 14 3 4 21 Conduit Assumed After 1985 15 0 0 15 Totals 29 3 4 36 Newcastle Conduit Modelled 34 0 1 35 Conduit Assumed After 1985 558 0 0 558 Totals 592 0 1 593 Newtonville Conduit Modelled 0 0 0 0 Conduit Assumed After 1985 13 0 0 13 Totals 13 0 0 13 Orono Conduit Modelled 45 1 3 49 Conduit Assumed After 1985 59 0 0 59 Totals 104 1 3 108 Tyrone Conduit Modelled 0 0 0 0 Conduit Assumed After 1985 6 0 0 6 Totals 6 0 0 6 Figure 3.7: Tabular results for all modelled sewer systems by urban area summarized Network Wide Totals <80% Capacity 80-100% Capacity >100% Capacity Total Conduits Number of Conduits 4,475 76 90 4,641 Percentages 96.42% 1.64% 1.94% 100% Figure 3.8: The percentage of the Municipal Storm water management system resilient to a 5-year storm. Page 209 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 51 The study results carried out by the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority revealed that the Municipality of Clarington’s storm sewer network is estimated to be 98.06 percent resilient to a 5-year storm event. The results indicate that approximately 90 of the conduits analyzed and modelled may have capacity issues under such an event. Several of the conduits within the network modelled for the study are included in roadways already identified for replacement in Clarington’s 5-year capital forecast. Of the identified assets, 90 percent are in Bowmanville, contained within older subdivisions an d road networks. Once replacement projects in these areas commence, staff and consultants will review designs and conduit sizing to ensure infrastructure meets current standards and capacity thresholds. It is recommended that Municipal staff use the stud y and report provided by Ganaraska to evaluate the future risk associated with the identified assets. Prioritization for future infrastructure replacements could potentially be modified if an increased risk has been recognized for conduit capacity limitations. Current Performance Measures Municipal Objective Technical Measure Technical Performance Target Providing Storm Water services in an efficient manner Annual Operating Cost to Provide Service ($ / Household) $17.20 Providing Storm Water services with minimal impact % Of Storm water assets in fair or better condition 93% Providing Storm Water services with minimal impact 5-Year Km Average of storm sewer network CCTV inspected annually (Includes new assumptions/Capital replacements /O&M) 8.97 Providing Storm Water services with minimal impact % Of storm system with insufficient capacity to convey flows of a 5-year weather event 1.94% Providing Storm Water services with minimal impact % Of Municipal properties resilient to a 100-year weather event 91.5% Providing Storm Water services with minimal impact % Of Municipal properties not resilient to a 100-year weather event 1.7% Page 210 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 52 Municipal Objective Technical Measure Technical Performance Target Providing Storm Water services with minimal impact % Of inspections & routine minor maintenance carried out on Storm Water Management Facilities annually 100% (Inspected and maintained once annually) Providing Storm Water services with minimal impact % Of Total Catch basins cleaned annually (3-year Avg) 18% Providing Storm Water services with minimal impact % Of streets with catch basins street swept twice annually 98% Figure 3.9: The calculated performance measures for storm water assets Page 211 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 53 Roads Current Level of Service Ontario Regulation 588/17 requires legislated community levels of service for core assets. Community levels of service use qualitative descriptions to describe the scope or quality of service delivered by an asset category. Examples of legislated community levels of service include a map showing the different levels of road class pavement conditions. Ontario Regulation 588/17 also requires legislated technical levels of service for core assets. Technical levels of service use metrics to measure the scope of service being delivered by the road infrastructure. Examples of technical levels of service include an average surface condition for paved roads based on the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) value and average condition levels for unpaved roads, such as gravel and earth. Service Attribute Community Levels of Service (Qualitative Descriptions) Technical levels of service (technical metrics) Scope Description, which may include maps, of the road network in the municipality and its level of connectivity. 1. Number of lane-kms of each arterial roads, collector roads and local roads as a proportion of square kms of land area in the municipality. Figure 3.10: O.Reg 588.17 Road Network Levels of Service Requirements The entire road network is analyzed bi-annually by completing the Statement of Infrastructure for Roads. 4Roads Management Services Inc. completed the most recent Statement of Road Infrastructure in 2019. This report provides accurate quality assessments and breakdowns of all the road infrastructure managed by Clarington. As part of completing the statement of road infrastructure, information was developed and provided to meet O.Reg 588/17 requirements for Clarington’s road infrastructure. The road infrastructure owned by the Municipality of Clarington is separated into three categories, arterial, collector and local roads. Figure 3.11 provides the operating requirements for each road class and the expected average daily traffic within each class. Road Classification Function Average Daily Traffic Arterial Roads Delivers high volumes of urban traffic between areas of activity. Above 15,000 Collector Roads Connects local streets with arterial streets. Provides traffic service to residential, schools, churches, parks, and low intensity commercial facilities. Between 1,500 and 15,000 Page 212 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 54 Road Classification Function Average Daily Traffic Local Roads Provides access to individual properties and connect neighbourhood destinations. Less than 1,500 Figure 3.11: Road Classification definitions Figure 3.12 details the number of lane kilometres for each road class. The technical level of service requirement for O.Reg 588/17 requires comparing the data from Figure 3 with the total square kilometres of land within the Municipality of Clarington. The total square kilometres of land within Clarington is 614 km2. Corporate Level of Service Objective Level of Service Measurement Technical Measurement Performance % Of Total Square Kilometres of Land Provide a transportation network with a reasonable level of connectivity Number of lane kilometres of arterial roads as a proportion of total square kilometres of land in the municipality. 4.100 0.22 % Number of lane kilometres of collector roads as a proportion of total square kilometres of land in the municipality. 541.391 28.92% Number of lane kilometres of local roads as a proportion of total square kilometres of land in the municipality. 1,326.704 70.86% Total lane kilometres of road in Clarington 1,872.195 (Total Square kilometres of land in Clarington is 612) Figure 3.12: Road Network Levels of Service – Lane Kilometres by Road Type This analysis indicates that a large majority of our road infrastructure are considered local roads, totalling 70.86 percent compared to the total square kilometres. The local roads also consist of 70.86 percent of the total road infrastructure. The collector roads represent 28.92 percent of the roads within Clarington, and the arterial road infrastructure consists of 0.22 percent of the total lane kilometres of roads. This data shows that a large portion of our road infrastructure is dedicated to local travel within Clarington. The AMP regulation also requires legislated technical levels of service metrics to measure the quality of service being delivered by the road infrastructure. From a qualitative perspective, the Municipality of Clarington must provide illustrations explaining the different levels of road class pavement conditions. For the technical levels of service, data includes an average surface condition for paved roads based on the Pavement Condition Index value and average condition levels for unpaved roads, such as gravel and earth. Page 213 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 55 Service Attribute Community Levels of Service (Qualitative Descriptions) Technical levels of service (technical metrics) Quality Description or images that illustrate the different levels of road class pavement condition. 1. For paved roads in the municipality, the average PCI value. 2. For unpaved roads in the municipality, the average surface condition (e.g., excellent, good, fair or poor). Figure 3.13: O.Reg 588.17 Road Network Levels of Service Quality Requirement Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is a value that provides the general quality of a road by a measurement that is completed by a manual survey of the pavement. PCI tracks the deterioration of a road as the infrastructure ages, ensuring that it me ets road safety standards and the level of service that the corporation desires to provide. The average PCI rating for Clarington’s roads is broken down in Figure 3.14. Paved Road Type Length of Road (km) Average of PCI Rating HCB1 1.96 68.50 HCB2 4.33 41.20 HCB3 170.86 64.67 HCB4 267.71 63.27 LCB1 365.96 50.56 Total 810.82 58.92 Figure 3.14: Average PCI for Paved Roads The average PCI rating for Clarington’s paved roads indicates that the road network, as a whole, is within the fair condition level at 58.92. To improve the average PCI level, the Municipality of Clarington must focus on rehabilitation of the largest area of road types, LCB or high float roads. The 365.96 kilometres of road within the LCB cat egory currently has an average PCI of 50.56. The second lowest of Clarington’s paved road types would be the 4.33 kilometres of HCB2 roads that are nearing the poor condition category, with an average PCI of 41.20. In Clarington, unpaved roads are categorized into two types, gravel and earth. The majority of costs for these types of roads are operating costs and are largely focused on the maintenance of gravel roads. Clarington’s unpaved roads do not utilize a capital rehabilitation program. Grading, dragging, and gravel patching are performed annually to ensure the gravel roads maintain a positive condition level. Page 214 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 56 Road Type Condition Levels Total Very Good Good Fair Poor Critical Earth 0.60 38.90 39.50 Gravel 24.16 13.12 15.62 9.17 2.85 64.92 Total Kilometres 24.16 13.12 15.62 9.77 41.75 104.42 Figure 3.15: Average Condition Ratings for Unpaved Roads in Kilometres The Municipality of Clarington currently manages 104.42 kilometres of gravel and earth roads. The gravel road infrastructure is favourable, with 81.48 percent of the inventory being in the very good to fair condition levels. In contrast, only 4.39 percent of the gravel road infrastructure are in the critical condition level and requires rehabilitation. The earth roads infrastructure condition level is within the critical area due to limited seasonal usage. These assets receive minimal to no maintenance and are utilized by a low number of our community. Page 215 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 57 Figure 3.16: Map displaying Clarington’s Road Network connectivity by PCI Value Page 216 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 58 Current Performance measures The average condition value of each road type will be used as a benchmark moving forward. This will be used to determine if road infrastructure condition ratings are improving or declining on average with each asset management plan update. The overall average condition rating of Clarington’s paved road network is 69.42. The physical condition assessment is provided within the bi-annual road statement of infrastructure. Figure 3.17: Average Condition by Road Type Road Type Road Type Length of Road (Metres) Average of Condition Rating Paved HCB1 820 50.00 HCB2 4,330 53.25 HCB3 164,280 75.33 HCB4 259,020 74.49 LCB1 365,960 53.23 Unpaved Gravel 64,480 56.23 Grand Total 858,890 Unpaved Roads Maintenance 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 5 Year Average Total Operating Costs $366,268 $326,073 $311,036 $377,739 $395,469 Total Lane Km's of Unpaved Roads* 207 208 210 213 212 Annual Cost Per KM $1,769 $1,568 $1,481 $1,773 $1,865 $1,691 Figure 3.18: 5 Year Annual Average Operating costs for Unpaved Roads *Lane kilometres of Unpaved Roads from FIR Annual Schedules *Unpaved roads consist of gravel and earth roads. Paved Roads Maintenance 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 5 Year Average Total Annual Operating Costs $2,105,248 $1,777,803 $1,821,056 $2,061,950 $1,657,458 Total Lane Km's of Paved Roads* 1,658 1,645 1,615 1,607 1,595 Annual Operating $1,270 $1,081 $1,128 $1,283 $1,039 $1,160 Page 217 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 59 Cost Per Lane KM Figure 3: 19 Year Annual Average Operating costs for Paved Roads *Lane kilometres of paved Roads from FIR Annual Schedules *Paved Roads Include LCB (low -class bituminous) and HCB (high-class bituminous) surfaced roads 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 5 Year Average Road Metre's Rehabilitated Annually 42,760 27,930 20,470 11,360 63,720 20,780 Figure 3.20: Paved Roads Rehabilitated 5 Year Average This metric provides the length of road Clarington has rehabilitated each of the last five years and the calculated average length of paved roads. This metric will allow us to determine if we are rehabilitating a greater number of roads each year to maintain our current service level. Since 2017, we have seen an increase each year with the length of road rehabilitated. This will connect directly with our avera ge condition rating values in Figure 3.17. Bridges & Culverts Current Level of Service As per O.Reg 588/17, this Asset Management Plan is built using the current level of service that the Municipality of Clarington is offering. The following tables identify the current level of service for Bridges & Culverts. These metrics include the community and technical level of service metrics that are required as part of O. Reg. 588/17. Additional information and metrics that are significant in achieving desired levels of service have also been included. Community Levels of Service The following table outlines the qualitative descriptions that determine the community levels of service provided by Bridges & Culverts. Service Attribute Qualitative Description Current Level of Service (2020) Scope Description of the traffic that is supported by municipal bridges (e.g., heavy transport vehicles, motor vehicles, emergency vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists) Bridges and structural culverts support the movement of motor vehicles, heavy transport vehicles, emergency vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists throughout the City’s Road network bridges and structural culverts are a key component of the municipal transportation network. Currently, there are two bridge s with a load limit by-law. Page 218 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 60 Service Attribute Qualitative Description Current Level of Service (2020) Quality Description or images of the condition of bridges and how this would affect the use of the bridges See the following images and descriptions of conditions below Quality Description or images of the condition of culverts and how this would affect use of the culverts See the following images and descriptions of conditions below Figure 3.21: qualitative descriptions for levels of service Condition Bridge Culvert Very Good >80 BCI The structure is functioning as intended. Very little to no deterioration. New or recent rehabilitation. Very low risk of failure. Low capital maintenance needs. Good 70 to 79.9 BCI Page 219 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 61 Condition Bridge Culvert The structures are functioning as intended. No major maintenance is anticipated within the next five years. Some signs of deterioration. Low risk of failure. Some unplanned maintenance is required Fair 65 to 69.9 BCI The structures are functioning as intended. Additional signs of deterioration and minor distress observed. Maintenance will be required within the next five years to maintain functionality Level of Service may be affected. Some failures occur. Rehabilitation is possible Condition Bridge Culvert Poor 60 to 64.9 BCI Page 220 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 62 Condition Bridge Culvert The structures are starting not to function as intended. Significant distress observed. Maintenance and some repairs are required within the next few years to restore functionality Failures will increasingly occur. Reduced ability to provide the service. Maintenance costs will likely increase. Rehabilitation may become impossible Critical < 60 The structures are not functioning as intended. Significant deterioration and major distress observed. Requires immediate attention. Assets have exceeded their service life and require careful monitoring and maintenance Figure 3.22: Clarington’s scale for bridge and culvert condition assessments. Table includes condition rating, condition grading, and the description of each specific condition category. Technical levels of service relate to the quality, quantity or capacity, reliability, environmental implications, availability, safety, and maintainability of the asset. They translate customer expectations and legislative requirements into technical objectives, performance measures, and targets. The primary service level is to maintain an adequate condition and load limits using the SPN as an indicator. Provincial legislation requires all bridges and culverts over 3.0 m span to be inspected under a professional engineer's direction every two years. Page 221 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 63 Clarington’s practice is to inspect all structures 1.2 m span and larger, which includes 271 structures. Each year, half of the structures are examined, and a Municipal Structure Inventory and Inspection report is produced by our consultant. The Inspections are completed following the MTO Municipal Bridge Appraisal Manual, February 1992, the MTO Municipal Culvert Appraisal Manual, Aug ust 1993, and the Ontario Structure Inspection Manual 2000, Rev April 2008. This report describes the condition of each structure, maintenance needs, significant rehabilitation needs, and replacement needs and summarizes the overall condition and funding requirements. Clarington has developed a ten-year plan based on the data collected during the inspections, updated as part of the annual inspection reporting. We base the plan on two main performance measures, the bridge condition index (BCI), and the structure priority number (SPN). The ten-year plan is developed through an iterative process. The list of structures is sorted by highest SPN. We then review the list to remove any structures under another agency’s jurisdiction, such as the railways or the province. We also remove structures that will be addressed through another process, such as reconstruction for development or the Highway 407 extension. The remaining structures are selected to fit within the projected budget in the forecast. We include structures that need to be replaced as well as repair work to extend the life of the structures. Each structure inspection sheet is briefly reviewed to determine if the structure should be moved up in the program to make repairs that will extend the life of the structure or moved down the list because the repair costs are so high it would be more cost effective to wait until the structure needs to be replaced. We also review our road improvement program to coordinate structure repairs with road repairs Condition measures are used to determine the current health and state of the Municipal Bridges and Culverts and help drive decisions relating to asset manag ement, maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement to improve condition s when required. Below is a table that outlines the current level of service for the specified attribute. Many legislative and regulatory requirements directly influence levels of ser vice. Due to the critical nature of the bridge and culvert structures, the Municipality's adherence to various legislative requirements is essential to ensure the structures are safe. The following standards and regulations must be adhered to: Ontario Regulation 104/97 Provincial legislation requires all bridges and culverts over 3.0 m span to be inspected under a professional engineer's direction every two years. The inspections are completed in accordance with the MTO Municipal Bridge Appraisal Manual, February 1992, and the MTO Municipal Culvert Appraisal Manual, Aug ust 1993, and the Ontario Structure Inspection Manual 2000, Rev April 2008. Ontario Regulation 239/02 Page 222 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 64 Provides rules and Minimum Maintenance Standards relating to bridge deck spalls and surface discontinuity. CSA S6-19 This Code is based on limit states design principles and defines design loadings, load combinations and load factors, criteria for earthquake resistant design, and detailed design criteria for the various materials. Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) is an Ontario law mandating that organizations must follow standards to become more accessible to people with disabilities. Highway Traffic Act, Section 123 Provides regulations limiting weight on bridges. O Reg 103/97 Contains standards to determine allowable gross vehicle weight for bridges Current Performance measures Service Attribute Qualitative Description 2019 2020 Trend Scope Percentage of bridges in the municipality with loading or dimensional restrictions* 2.02 % 2.02% Quality For bridges in the municipality, the average bridge condition index value. 71.13 72.53 Quality For culverts in the municipality, the average bridge condition index value. 70.59 70.87 Quality For pedestrian bridges in the municipality, the average bridge condition index value. 80.03 77.56 Quality For bridges in the municipality, the average SPN 27.35 27.32 Quality For culverts in the municipality, the average SPN 30.4 30.32 Quality For pedestrian bridges in the municipality, the average SPN 24.27 25.65 Figure 3.23: The calculated performance measures for bridge and culvert assets. Page 223 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 65 Page 224 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 66 Lifecycle Management Strategy Storm Water Management Lifecycle Activities Storm sewer infrastructure in Clarington undergoes regular asset management activities that enable the assets to provide the current levels of service sustainably, while managing risk at the lowest lifecycle cost. The condition and performance of all storm sewer assets deteriorate over time. Due to the long useful life of these assets, the deterioration period is gradual and dependent on many various factors and characteristics. These factors may include an asset’s location, utilization, maintenance history and environment. Clarington has ensured programs are in place so that storm sewer infrastructure is monitored to track the deterioration over time and identify when proactive and reactive maintenance is required as well as repair and replacement requirements. Storm Water Conduit Maintenance Activities: Inspections Storm sewer conduit should continue to include an annual maintenance program employing CCTV inspections and pipe flushing. This maintenance a ctivity is typically performed around year 40 and closer to the end of the asset’s life. The approach of inspecting the pipe around year 40 is to identify any issues that may be starting to occur halfway through the asset’s lifecycle. Typically, the inspections align with the road network reconstruction programs. Coordinating these two projects ultimately leads to lower total project costs since pipe rehabilitation or replacement can occur when the road is being replaced. It is recommended conduit be inspected and flushed up to three times throughout its lifecycle. This ensures any sewer repair or replacement needs are identified. The first inspection is typically performed before assuming the asset to confirm it has been installed as designed. This initial inspection would not require flushing maintenance and Page 225 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 67 is not included in the lifecycle costing schedule since it occurs before asset ownership by the Municipality. Clarington has been performing CCTV inspections on its c onduit since 2010. The Public Works Department has kept maintenance records for all the locations inspected and uses the video from these inspections to help prioritize reconstruction projects in the five-year capital budget program. Although inspections have been occurring for over a decade, Clarington has built up a backlog of inspections based on the pipe's age alone. This backlog is due to budget constraints and a significant amount of infrastructure built throughout the 1950s and 1960s. The backlog of events has been included in the 2021 forecasted operating requirement and will continue to roll forward until inspections are caught up to current lifecycle requirements. Replacement: This asset management plan focuses on replacing storm water conduits at the end of their useful life through the capital replacement program. There is a backlog of replacements shown in the 2021 capital forecast due to the age of the infrastructure constructed in 1950-1960s. Although the assets were given an estimated useful life of 40 years, it has become evident that much of the infrastructure has held up to current levels of service beyond that estimated time frame through the CCTV inspection program. Most of the backlogged end-of-life assets are scheduled to be replaced through various road reconstruction contracts within the next five -year capital cycle. Once these assets have been replaced there are minimal capital replacement needs over the next 15 to 20 years. With future needs being so minimal, an affordable budget approach to gradually work towards decreasing the backlog has been implemented. This approach works considering service levels have not been lost. If the levels of service Clarington provides begin to deteriorate, the replacement of these assets will need to be prioritized at an increased pace. Storm Water Structure Maintenance Activities: Clarington currently performs lifecycle activities on two types of storm water structures. These structures are curb and gutter catch basins and maintenance holes. Inlets, outlets, outfalls, oil grit separators, and catch basins located off the roadways such as in parks or rear yards do not have current lifecycle activities. The Public Works Department will continue to monitor these structures and work towards implementing required maintenance activities if a time comes when these assets begin to no longer provide the expected level of service. Inspections Like stormwater conduit, the maintenance holes and catch basins are CCTV inspected. Given that the estimated useful life of these structures is identical to the conduit, the inspection schedule is also aligned. When the conduit on a particular roadway is Page 226 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 68 scheduled to be inspected, the maintenance holes and catch basins included in that system will likely be inspected as well. Resetting Maintenance holes and catch basins receive adjustments and resetting throughout the asset lifecycles as structures age, water flow, traffic, and frost help to deteriorate the concrete. These factors can vary widely by location, making the prediction of a maintenance schedule for this activity challenging. Although not always the case, often these structures need to be adjusted when the road surface is shaved and repaved ; therefore, it was decided to align this activity with the road network pavement work requirements. Due to the size of the inventory of these assets Clarington does not have the resources to inspect every one of these structures annually. The process currently is to rely on public complaints and road patrol crews to identify locations where there are issues. Those locations are then inspected by Public Works staff, and if warranted, they are added to an annual tender for repair. A backlog for this maintenance activity exists from prior years. This is partially due to an incomplete database of pre-existing maintenance. The last three years of resetting work was reviewed, and those locations were removed from the backlog or 10 -year forecast. Other assets likely exist within the forecast or backlog that may have been reset in the last 10 to 20 years. Due to the unpredictability of when the activity may occur, if at all Page 227 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 69 and lack of prior maintenance activity data, the forecast for this specific event is likely marginally inflated. Street Sweeping Clarington currently performs street sweeping activities a minimum of twice per year. Activities focus on urban areas where some streets may be swept more frequently if necessary. This activity usually takes place in the spring and fall months. During the spring, sweeping removes sand and salt from the roadways before it enters the basins and, eventually the storm system. In the fall, it helps to remove the accumulation of leaf debris from the curb and gutters. In the past Clarington was able to perform street sweeping activities with little cost. Clarington owns and operates its street sweeper truck and does not have to contract this service. Aside from employee wages and fuel, there are minimal operating costs associated with this maintenance activity. New provincial legislation will be implemented in 2022 for the safe removal and disposal of street sweeping sediment. This change in legislation will require Clarington to contract out the disposal of sweepings. It has been estimated this service will cost approximately $650,000 annually. Once the service has been contracted and performed Clarington will be able better to define the actual activity cost for this event. Forecasts and projections will be refined in future asset management plans once actual costs are established. Page 228 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 70 Basin Cleaning & Disposal Curb and gutter catch basins are cleaned every three years on a rotating schedule. This service is contracted out and entails removing and disposing of debris and buildup in the basins. This service is vital to ensuring the debris that makes its way into the catch basins does not have a chance to build up. Buildup can result in flooding and can make its way into the stormwater management ponds. It can have environmental impacts and lead to sediment accumulation resulting in pre-mature pond cleanouts. Replacement This asset management plan replaces stormwater structures through the capital replacement program at the end of their useful life. Historically structures have been built using concrete and have stood up to estimated life expectancies as anticipated. No replacement backlog exists for our storm structures, leading to a limited capital replacement requirement over the next ten years. Although the capital requirement does not identify the need for s ignificant replacement within the ten-year plan, some assets will likely be replaced before the end of useful life occurs to coincide with the conduit and road network replacement schedules. This will provide a cost-benefit and avoid unaligned reconstructi on work in the future. Storm Water Wet / Dry Pond Maintenance Activities: In 2011, the Municipality of Clarington retained AECOM to assess the functionality and identify maintenance needs for stormwater ponds. AECOM developed a long -term maintenance needs plan for all the storm water facilities owned and operated by the Municipality at that time. Based on the results of the study and field assessment, the Municipality has been able to successfully implement several initiatives to maintain and remediate our stormwater facilities to ensure each one continues to function as it was intended. Page 229 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 71 Inspection Since receiving the finalized report from AECOM in 2013, the Municipality has implemented a comprehensive annual inspection program on each storm water facility assumed by the Municipality. This annual program, which is performed by Public Works staff, ensures deficiencies are identified, issues are corrected, and routine maintenance requirements are completed. • Various attributes that make up the storm water management facilities are inspected annually. Some of these include: • Forebays • Forebay Berms • Inlet/Outlets • Slope Conditions • Erosion Control Features • Vegetation Growth • Sediment Accumulation Inspection reports are completed by staff and assessed condition ratings are assigned to each asset and uploaded into the asset management software. The condition reports are used by staff to coordinate the required minor and major maintenance activities at each facility. Minor Maintenance This maintenance work is identified through the inspection reports and is scheduled at each facility at least once annually. Minor maintenance may include activities such as grass cutting and litter and debris removal from the facilities ' inlets and outlets. These activities are performed by Clarington Public Works staff with no contracted lifecycle event cost associated. Page 230 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 72 Major Maintenance Additional maintenance works recommended to be completed every five years include aquatic terrestrial vegetation maintenance, erosion restoration and structural repairs. In most cases, these activities are also performed by Clarington Public Works staff. This Asset Management Plan identifies no contracted cost associated with this lifecycle event. However, on rare occasions, a vendor may be contracted to perform work outside the skillset of Municipal staff. Sediment Quantity Monitoring Survey Sediment monitoring surveys should be completed every five years, especially in the years following the assumption of the facility from the developer. Once catchment areas have been established and lifecycle activities on the catch basins in those catchment areas have been implemented, the monitoring should be use d to establish sediment load rates. These load rates can be used to predict future cleanout and sediment removal works. The Municipality should establish standard sediment quantity monitoring Page 231 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 73 and reporting procedures to ensure consistent results each year. Currently, Clarington contracts out this activity to a consulting firm. Clarington has only been performing sediment monitoring on facilities where visual inspections have identified sediment accumulation. These surveys are then used to prioritize pond cleanout work. It is recommended that Clarington enhance the frequency of sediment monitoring to provide the Municipality with a comprehensive understanding of current pond functionality to ensure an adequate level of service continues to be met. This Plan incorporates a scheduled life event for sediment quality monitoring every five years for wet and dry ponds. Due to past practice, there remains a backlog of surveys not performed within the past five years. This backlog is identified in the 2021 budget year and will continue to roll forward until the associated facilities have completed quantity monitoring surveys. Sediment Cleanout & Removal As per the report provided by AECOM, sediment cleanout and removal for both wet and dry stormwater ponds is recommended every 10 to 20 years. Schedules for each pond can vary based on facility storage volume s and the size of the catchment areas. This asset management plan estimates a lifecycle cleanout activity every 15 years for wet ponds and every 20 years for dry ponds. It is challenging to estimate the approximate cost of cleaning out each pond. Cost can vary significantly based on the amount of sediment present, the size of the facility, access to the facility, and the method used to clean the facility. AECOM’s re port estimated an approximate cost of $250,000 per pond. That amount has been inflated to current pricing and used as an estimate for all Clarington’s wet ponds. It was determined dry ponds would likely cost 25 percent less to clean. The reduced pricing structure was used for all of Clarington’s dry pond facilities. Page 232 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 74 The maintenance costs for pond cleanouts are currently budgeted through Clarington’s capital works program rather than the annual operating budget due to fluctuating costs and length of time to complete. This helps Clarington save for projects that may require more than one budget year to finance and allows for unexpended funds from one cleanout to be available for the next pond cleanout. The Plan shows these activities as operating requirements, even though Clarington budgets the activity as a capital requirement. The wet and dry pond inventory includes a backlog of ponds that require cleanouts. Th e significant operating requirement shows this for 2021. Once Clarington can reduce the current backlog, stormwater pond cleanouts will become financially manageable over the next ten years. Clarington is working towards completing a stormwater master maintenance plan which will help prioritize pond cleanou t schedules and get the stormwater pond lifecycle event activities back on a consistent schedule. Replacement This asset management plan replaces stormwater ponds at the end of the asset’s useful life through the capital replacement program. Storm water ponds are relatively new and are expected to have long useful lives. Clarington does not have a storm water pond scheduled for replacement until approximately 2063. A sizable portion of the storm water management facilities’ construction costs originates from excavating the original basin. It is estimated that replacement costs will be 30 percent less than those of the initial expenditure. All storm water assets detailed lifecycle events, event costs, event impact and approximate asset age of scheduled event can be reviewed in Appendix 4. Page 233 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 75 Full Lifecycle Costs The following graphs forecast long-term operating and capital requirements for Clarington’s stormwater assets. Lifecycle events in year one includes all backlogged events, and each year after that includes scheduled events at 2 percent inflation of the 2020 lifecycle event cost. $53,000 $0.00 $20,000.00 $40,000.00 $60,000.00 $80,000.00 $100,000.00 $120,000.00 $140,000.00 $160,000.00 $180,000.00 $200,000.00 $220,000.00 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Forecasted Storm water Conduit 10-Year Operating Requirements Figure 4.1: Forecasted 10-year operating requirements for conduit • Excluding the backlog, operating requirements between 2021 -2028 average $16,000. • In the 1990s a large amount of assets were constructed and assumed. This is evident in 2029-2030, where operating requirements escalate significantly. • To decrease the backlogged inspections and adequately account for the expanded requirements in nine to ten years, an annual operating requirement of approximately $53,000 is suggested to maintain the current level of service Clarington is providing. Page 234 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 76 $104,000 $0.00 $50,000.00 $100,000.00 $150,000.00 $200,000.00 $250,000.00 $300,000.00 $350,000.00 $400,000.00 $450,000.00 $500,000.00 $550,000.00 $600,000.00 $650,000.00 $700,000.00 $750,000.00 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Forecasted Storm water Conduit 10-Year Capital Requirements Figure 4.2: Forecasted 10-year capital requirements for conduit • Concrete storm sewer assets are still relatively new , with an average inventory age of 22 years. The young age means very few concrete conduits will reach the end of life within ten years. • Over the next five to ten years, the capital program will focus on replacing the end-of-life non-concrete infrastructure and urbanizing roadways that don’t have the pre-existing infrastructure to service Clarington’s expanding population. • To decrease the backlog and replace all additional end -of-life assets over the next ten years, an annual capital requirement of approximately $104,000 is suggested to maintain Clarington's current level of service. • Capital replacement requirements identified in this graph are solely the costs required to replace the existing asset. They do not include any consulting and design costs, or costs associated with digging up the roadway infrastructure. These costs are incorporated with the road network replacement r equirements. Page 235 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 77 $1,554,000 $0.00 $200,000.00 $400,000.00 $600,000.00 $800,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,200,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,600,000.00 $1,800,000.00 $2,000,000.00 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Forecasted Storm water Structures 10-Year Operating Requirements Figure 4.3: Forecasted 10-year operating requirements for structures • New regulations for street sweeping sediment disposal come into effect in 2022, creating an estimated $650,000 annual budget increase. • It is possible further budget increases can be expected in the ten-year plan if it is decided structures currently not being maintained with regular maintenance activities begin scheduled lifecycle events. • To decrease backlogged maintenance and to properly account for new regulations, an annual operating requirement of approximately $1,554,000 is suggested to maintain the current level of service Clarington is providing. $1,525 $0.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $6,000.00 $8,000.00 $10,000.00 $12,000.00 $14,000.00 $16,000.00 $18,000.00 $20,000.00 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Storm water Structures Forecasted 10-Year Capital Requirements Page 236 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 78 Figure 4.4: Forecasted 10-year capital requirements for structures • Concrete storm sewer assets are still relatively new , with an average inventory age of 22 years. This relatively young age means very few structures will reach the end of life within ten years. • Over the next five to ten years, the capital program will include replacing ageing infrastructure on roadways being reconstructed and urbanizing roadways that don’t have the pre-existing infrastructure to service Clarington’s expanding population. • To replace all the end-of-life assets over the next ten years, an annual capital requirement of approximately $1,525 is suggested to maintain the current level of service Clarington is providing. • Capital replacement requirements identified in this graph are solely the costs required to replace the existing asset. They do not include any consulting and design costs, or costs associated with digging up the roadway infrastructure. These costs are incorporated with the road network replacement requirements. $582,000 $0.00 $200,000.00 $400,000.00 $600,000.00 $800,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,200,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,600,000.00 $1,800,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $2,200,000.00 $2,400,000.00 $2,600,000.00 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Forecasted Storm water Ponds 10-Year Operating Requirements Figure 4.5: Forecasted 10-year capital operating for storm water ponds • Excluding the backlog, operating requirements between 2021 to 2030 average $325,000 annually. • In the early 1990s a large number of assets were constructed and assumed. This construction has led to several ponds requiring cleanouts all at once. To mitigate budget impacts, Clarington has prioritized ponds by condition and risk to work towards decreasing the backlog of cleanout events. Page 237 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 79 • To decrease the backlogged cleanouts and sediment surveys , an annual operating requirement of approximately $582,000 is suggested to provide the level of service expected from storm water management facilities. • No capital end-of-life replacements for storm water management facilities are anticipated within the 10-year forecast. Risks Associated with Lifecycle Options All the lifecycle costing options reviewed and analyzed for conduits, structures and storm ponds will continue to be required for Clarington to maintain current levels of service. It is recommended that budget shortfalls be reviewed so backlogs can be addressed to avoid further deterioration of some aging infrastructure. Stormwater infrastructure is deemed to have significant useful lives. Many of these assets are not visible to the public eye, which not only makes issues more difficult to identify it can leave certain lifecycle activities overlooked. It is essential that Clarington follows through with its planned maintenance master plan and continues to improve inspection monitoring capabilities, scheduling of events and following through with all anticipated and required maintenance. The Municipality must ensure it maximizes the maintenance budgets allotted by Council annually. Although there are few short-term capital replacement needs for storm sewer infrastructure, eventually, several assets will require replacement in and around the same time. Clarington should work towards future planning of these needs to mitigate infrastructure gaps and substantial increases to the capital budget over a short period. The deterioration of stormwater infrastructure can lead to various risks if not maintained to its original functions. These risks can include the following: • Potential liability issues • Emergency repairs • Non-compliance with Ministry of the Environment Certificates of approval or compliance approvals • Reduced aids in public health • Increased risk of flooding • Environmental contaminations Roads Lifecycle Activities Clarington’s asset management plan provides detailed lifecycles for all road infrastructure managed and owned by the Corporation. Lifecycle events are Page 238 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 80 categorized into four treatment levels, prevention, restoration, rehabilitation, and replacement. Each treatment level includes events for road infrastructure to operate efficiently as possible. The lifecycle breakdown for each road type is provided in Appendix A. Preventative Treatments Preventative lifecycle events are processes used to decrease the amount of deterioration within a road. The preferred timing to complete these events is determined by timing and road condition assessments. There are three types of events that Clarington currently utilizes as preventative activities for roadways. Crack sealing is the placement of a sealant material into cracks of an existing pavement surface to prevent excess water and moisture from penetrating the asphalt. This sealing is a preventative measure to keep the road from deteriorating further. Crack sealing can be done as a stand-alone treatment or in conjunction with other treatments. Crack sealing is performed on all high-class bituminous roads once the physical condition value reaches 88 percent. Once completed, this treatment maintains the current condition rating for two years. Micro-surfacing and slurry seal is a thin layer (3/8”) applied to an existing paved surface. Two layers can also be applied. This treatment adds a tough wearing coat to the existing pavement. This treatment intends to seal and protect the existing pavement and provide a new wearing course. This treatment does not add strength to the pavement structure. Crack sealing is applied to the pavement before this event. For micro- surfacing, some of the cast-iron structures in the street will be adjusted to final grade before application if deemed necessary. Minor pothole patching and other pavement repairs are done before the application of this treatment. Micro-surfacing is performed on high-class bituminous roads once the physical condition value reaches 77 percent. Once completed, this treatment maintains the current condition rating for three years. Restorative Treatments The focus of these events is to provide corrective processes that improve the current quality of the road to a predetermined rating. Mill and overlay treatment removes the deteriorating wearing surface and leaves the substructure intact. The existing pavement has 0.5 to 2 inches of the surface ground off. All of the cast iron structures (manholes, catch basins water and gas gates) will be reset to meet the new pavement elevation. A bonding agent is sprayed on the pavement, and approximately 1.5 to 2 inches of new pavement is installed. All of the cast-iron structures are adjusted to the final grade before application. Minor pothole patching and other pavement repairs are done before this treatment. This treatment adds strength to the road surface. This process is performed on high-class bituminous Page 239 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 81 roads once the physical condition value reaches 64 percent. Once the mill and overlay are completed the condition rating increases by 27 condition points. Rehabilitative Treatment Rehabilitative treatments are processes that improve the road to like-new conditions. These treatments are planned principally by road condi tion, although other factors such as roadside environment, traffic requirements, and age can be additional decision factors. Major rehabilitation procedures are planned for all high -bituminous class roads when the condition rating reaches 46. This treatment replaces the entire wearing surface and returns the surface's physical condition to 100. Reconstruction / Replacement This treatment is intended for a roadway that has outlived its useful life. Reconstruction/replacement is considered to be the most aggressive resurfacing treatment. The entire pavement structure is completely pulverized to a depth of 14” to 20”. Most of the pulverized material is reused as a sub-base for asphalt paving. Additional material may be required to be blended in the sub-base to meet specifications. After the sub-base is installed, a minimum of 4” of asphalt is installed in multiple layers. Lifecycle Events Per Road Type Due to the wide range of road types that are found in our community, different lifecycle maps are providing the events for each road type. Page 240 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 82 Road Class HCB-1 AADT > 20,000 (assume 10% commercial), assumes 210mm asphalt Lifecycle Event Cost per lane km "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx. Lifecycle Year Crack Sealing $ 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 4 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 9 Rural Overlay / Grind Urban Overlay 529,934 64 Increase Physical Condition by 27 15 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 16 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 21 Rural Overlay 2 Lifts / Major Urban Rehab 892,235 46 Increase Physical Condition to 100 33 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 37 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 42 Rural Overlay / Grind Urban Overlay 529,934 64 Increase Physical Condition by 27 48 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 49 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 54 Rural Overlay 2 Lifts / Major Urban Rehab 892,235 46 Increase Physical Condition to 100 66 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 67 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 72 Full Reconstruction 2,507,462 33 Increase PCI to 100 89 Figure 4.6: Lifecycle events for road class HCB-1 Page 241 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 83 Road Class HCB-2 AADT > 10,000 < 20,000 (assume 10% commercial), assumes 170mm asphalt Lifecycle Event Cost per lane km "Physical Condition " Rating Effect Approx. Lifecycle Year Crack Sealing $ 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 5 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 10 Rural Overlay / Grind Urban Overlay 529,934 64 Increase Physical Condition by 27 17 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 18 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 23 Rural Overlay 2 Lifts / Major Urban Rehab 892,235 46 Increase Physical Condition to 100 37 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 42 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 47 Rural Overlay / Grind Urban Overlay 529,934 64 Increase Physical Condition by 27 54 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 55 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 60 Rural Overlay / Grind Urban Overlay 529,934 64 Increase Physical Condition by 27 67 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 68 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 73 Full Reconstruction 2,507,462 33 Increase PCI to 100 89 Figure 4.7: Lifecycle events for road class HCB-2 Page 242 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 84 Road Class HCB-3 AADT > 1,000 < 10,000 (assume 10% commercial), assumes 130mm asphalt Lifecycle Event Cost/lane-km "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx. Lifecycle Year Crack Sealing $ 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 7 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 13 Rural Overlay / Grind Urban Overlay 529,934 64 Increase Physical Condition by 27 21 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 22 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 28 Rural Overlay 2 Lifts / Major Urban Rehab 892,235 46 Increase Physical Condition to 100 43 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 50 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 56 Rural Overlay / Grind Urban Overlay 529,934 64 Increase Physical Condition by 27 64 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 65 Micro Surfacing 34,297 77 Holds condition for 3 years 71 Full Reconstruction 2,507,462 33 Increase PCI to 100 94 Figure 4.8: Lifecycle events for road class HCB-3 Road Class HCB-4 AADT < 1,000 (assume 5% commercial), assumes 90mm asphalt Lifecycle Event Cost/lane- km "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx. Lifecycle Year Crack Sealing $ 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 11 Single Coat Slurry Seal 24,872 77 Holds condition for 3 years 18 Rural Overlay / Grind Urban Overlay 529,934 64 Increase Physical Condition by 27 26 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 28 Single Coat Slurry Seal 24,872 77 Holds condition for 3 years 35 Rural Overlay 2 Lifts / Major Urban Rehab 892,235 46 Increase Physical Condition to 100 50 Crack Sealing 2,419 88 Holds condition for 2 years 61 Single Coat Slurry Seal 24,872 77 Holds condition for 3 years 68 Full Reconstruction 2,507,462 31 Increase PCI to 100 89 Figure 4.9: Lifecycle events for road class HCB-4 Page 243 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 85 Road Class LCB AADT = All Lifecycle Event Cost/lane- km "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx. Lifecycle Year Slurry Seal Surface Treatment $11,025 97 Extend the Useful life by 5 years 1 Double Surface Treatment Resurfacing 42,000 20 Increase Physical Condition to 100 15 Slurry Seal Surface Treatment 11,025 97 Extend the Useful life by 5 years 16 Double Surface Treatment Resurfacing 42,000 20 Increase Physical Condition to 100 30 Slurry Seal Surface Treatment 11,025 97 Extend the Useful life by 5 years 31 Double Surface Treatment Resurfacing 42,000 20 Increase Physical Condition to 100 45 Figure 4.10: Lifecycle events for road class LCB Page 244 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 86 Full Lifecycle Costs The average annual operating investment required to meet the forecasted costs over the next ten years is $1.21 million. The costs in this chart are solely based on road pavement preservation requirements and do not include costs that are not directly associated with the lifecycle events of Clarington’s paved road infrastructure. Costs included in these events include crack sealing and slurry seal. Roads Network 10 Year Financial Requirement $1,214,554 $0.00 $500,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $2,500,000.00 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Road Network Forecasted Operating 10-Year Financial Requirement Figure 4.11: Road Network 10 Year Operating Financial Requirements The ten-year estimated capital investment required for road infrastructure. The average annual capital investment required to meet the forecasted costs is $21.24 million. Our CityWide asset management software has provided the capital requirement estimates following the condition assessments provided from the 2019 Roads Statement of Infrastructure. Costs in the capital forecast estimate include restorative, rehabilitative and replacement road segment projections. Page 245 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 87 $21,241,169 $0.00 $10,000,000.00 $20,000,000.00 $30,000,000.00 $40,000,000.00 $50,000,000.00 $60,000,000.00 $70,000,000.00 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Road Network Forecasted Capital 10-Year Financial Requirement Figure 4.12: Road Network 10 Year Operating Financial Requirements Risks Associated with Lifecycle Options Clarington completes road assessments every two years as part of a statement of infrastructure evaluation to ensure that road conditions and performance are adequate. This process ensures that roads requiring improvements at earlier intervals can be adjusted. To mitigate risk of failure within Clarington’s road network, it is essential to ensure scheduled treatments are completed at their required intervals. If treatments are delayed or removed, this will substantially increase the pavement deterioration , increasing the required work and costs of projects. In addition to the increased cost, the inherent risk of road failure will see a drastic elevation. In cases when preventative treatments are removed, the life expectancy of a road will decrease rapidl y. This will cause the requirement of substantial rehabilitation or reconstruction projects and will bring increased investment in road infrastructure earlier than planned. The deterioration of road infrastructure can lead to various risks if not maintained to its original functions. These risks can include the following: • Increase in liability issues • Emergency repairs • Non-compliance with Ministry of Transportation Standards • Reduced aids in public health • Decreased safety for road users Clarington will strive towards future planning of these needs to mitigate infrastructure gaps and substantial increases to the capital budget at one time. The Municipality of Clarington is also committed to best practices in asset management and sustainability for road infrastructure. Page 246 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 88 The projected investment requirements contain the lifecycle events that are essential for the current level of service to be maintained. These lifecycle events are detrimental to the quality of the road network. They are instituted at specific lifecycle points to ensure the lowest costs are achieved while meeting the current service quality. In cases when planned treatments are removed, there will be long-range implications with regard to future budget requirements. Roadways will require substantially increased preservation activities at elevated lifecycle timeframes, causing more significant strain on future budgets. Completing lifecycle events at the estimated timeframe will minimize pavement preservation costs and continue to maintain the current service level provided for our road network. Bridges & Culverts Lifecycle Activities Bridges and culverts undergo regular asset management activities to ensure the asset s perform at desired service levels while managing risk at the lowest life cycle cost. Lifecycle activities include maintenance and other interventions undertaken to sustain asset integrity and service levels and occur over the life of an asset. Over time, these costs can outweigh the initial cost of the asset. The lifecycle management strategy helps plan these maintenance costs over a forecast period. Age alone is not an accurate indicator of an asset’s position in its lifecycle. Bridge and culvert maintenance requirements, rehabilitation and replacements are generally based on observed condition and age along with the inspection recommendations. Condition assessments play a key role in lifecycle analysis. Assets will deteriorate faster or slower than expected depending on whether the asset is maintained. The condit ion assessment information provides a more accurate indication of lifecycle needs. From an asset management perspective, maintenance solutions include regularly scheduled costs to inspect or maintain assets. Lifecycle costing for bridges and culverts is comprised of the following costs over an asset’s useful life: • Acquisition or Construction • Maintenance and Inspections • Rehabilitation • Replacement or Removal Page 247 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 89 Inspections Every year GHD submits an Inventory and Inspection report relating to half of the bridge and culverts within the Municipality of Clarington. Structures are reviewed in accordance with the Municipal Bridge Appraisal Manual and Municipal Culvert Appraisal Manual. The GHD annual inspection reports update a ten-year forecast for recommended maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement of our structures. The annual recommendations are based on several factors such as budget, traffic, condition, detour length, surrounding projects etc. The GHD Municipal Structure Inventory and Inspection Report includes lifecycle costing, the total value required to maintain the current level of service and a recommended annual budget. Minor Rehabilitation & Repairs Bridges and culverts can be maintained by performing minor rehabilitation when required. Examples of minor rehabilitation works typically include the replacement of bridge bearings, resurfacing, replacement of waterproofing, concrete sealing, patching, replacement of expansion joints, curb repairs, sidewalk repairs, replacement of handrails and restoration of embankments. Major Rehabilitation & Repairs Bridges and culverts can be maintained by performing major rehabilitation when required. Major rehabilitations typically involve more extensive work such as concrete overlays on decks or deck replacements, replacement of bridge barriers, resurfacing of substructure components, recoating structural steel, installation of beams, and construction of new walls. Replacement or Removal There are circumstances when the most cost-effective option is to replace or remove the asset. This happens when the asset no longer benefits from the repair or rehab performed, and the frequency of failures and associate d risks increase to an unacceptable level. On occasion, bridge s or culverts may be removed and disposed of. Disposal costs should be considered in the lifecycle costs for these circumstances. The table below outlines the # of bridge and culvert assets that require repair, rehabilitation, removal, or replacement. Rehabilitation Required Number of Assets Bridge Major Rehabilitation 9 Bridge Minor Repair 61 Bridge Removal 1 Bridge Replacement 4 Culvert Minor Repair 58 Culvert Replacement 34 Figure 4.13: Number of assets requiring rehabilitation Page 248 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 90 Bridges and culverts must be inspected, and that preventative maintenance should be performed to ensure assets are performing at desired service levels and to identify existing problems before failure occurs. The table below shows the value of required repair, rehabilitation, replacement, or removal amount by type. Improvement Desc Bridge Culvert Pedestrian Bridge Grand Total Bridge Major Rehab $2,813,000 $0 $0 $2,813,000 Bridge Minor Repair 3,695,000 0 190,000 3,885,000 Bridge Removal 155,000 0 0 155,000 Bridge Replacement 2,881,000 0 0 2,881,000 Culvert Major Rehab 0 0 0 0 Culvert Minor Repair 0 3,253,000 0 3,253,000 Culvert Replacement 0 12,762,000 0 12,762,000 Total $9,544,000 $16,015,000 $190,000 $25,749,000 Figure 4.14: Estimated cost of maintenance Bridges and Culverts can be restored to the desired condition and an acceptable service level. As a result, their useful life can be extended through planned rehabilitation actions. This is often more cost-effective than letting an asset reach its end of life. It is essential to consider whether it is more economical to repair or replace the asset, given the expected frequency of future repairs. Preventative maintenance is significant in planning to optimize the use of available resources and increase the asset's lifespan and reliability. Maintenance is scheduled on an as-needed basis due to the biannual inspections. Suspected performance deficiencies include pedestrian/vehicular hazards, rough-riding surface, undermining of foundation, continuing movements, load-carrying capacity and unstable embankments. Full Lifecycle Costs The estimated financial requirements are based on the GHD inspection recommendations and include the cost to complete all associated rehabilitation, repair, replacement, and removal costs. The graphs identify an annual average that should be allocated to each asset type over the next ten-years to fulfill current lifecycle requirements and maintain the level of service currently being provided. Page 249 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 91 $963,000 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 BRIDGE FORECASTED 10-YEAR FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT Figure 4.15: 10-year forecast for bridge requirements For Bridge assets, the average amount to be allocated per year to fund the forecasted lifecycle costs for the next ten years totals $963,000. $1,588,200 $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 CULVERT FORECASTED 10-YEAR FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT Figure 4.16: 10-year forecast for culvert requirements For Culvert assets, the average amount to be allocated per year to fund the forecasted lifecycle costs for the next ten years totals $1,588,200. Page 250 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 92 $10,395 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 2024 2025 2028 2029 2030 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FORECASTED 10-YEAR FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT Figure 4.16: 10-year forecast for pedestrian bridge requirements For Pedestrian bridge assets, the average amount to be allocated per year to fund the forecasted lifecycle costs for the next ten years totals $10,395. The table below provides the rehab and maintenance costs per square metre for bridges. ASSET TYPE TOTAL AREA Bridges 13,149.81 YEAR REHAB / MAINT $ Cost per Square Metre 2021 $ 919,000 $69.89 2022 490,000 37.26 2023 1,338,000 101.75 2024 560,000 42.59 2025 279,000 21.22 2026 1,071,000 81.45 2027 1,810,000 137.64 2028 159,000 12.09 2029 1,353,000 102.89 2030 1,290,000 98.10 Figure 4.17: Rehab and maintenance costs per square metre - Bridges Page 251 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 93 The table below provides the rehabilitation and maintenance costs per square metre for culverts. Figure 4.18: Rehab and maintenance costs per square metre - Culverts The table below provides the rehab and maintenance costs per square metre for pedestrian bridges. Figure 4.19: Rehab and maintenance costs per square metre – Pedestrian Bridges ASSET TYPE TOTAL AREA Culverts 8,917.63 YEAR REHAB / MAINT COST/M2 2021 $ 583,000 $ 65.38 2022 1,762,000 197.59 2023 851,000 95.43 2024 1,502,000 168.43 2025 1,468,000 164.62 2026 1,017,000 114.04 2027 493,000 55.28 2028 2,296,000 257.47 2029 1,106,000 124.02 2030 936,000 104.96 ASSET TYPE TOTAL AREA Pedestrian Bridges 704.08 YEAR REHAB / MAINT COST/M2 2021 $0.00 $0.00 2022 $0.00 $0.00 2023 $0.00 $0.00 2024 $12,000 $17.04 2025 $40,000 $56.81 2026 $0.00 $0.00 2027 $0.00 $0.00 2028 $7,000 $9.94 2029 $8,000 $11.36 2030 $37,000 $52.55 Page 252 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 94 The table below provides an outline of the lifecycle costs by asset type $0 $20,000,000 $40,000,000 $60,000,000 $80,000,000 $100,000,000 $120,000,000 $140,000,000 $160,000,000 Bridge Culvert Pedestrian Bridge Sum of Replacement Cost Sum of Maintenance Cost Sum of Historical Cost Figure 4.20: Lifecycle costs by asset type Page 253 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 95 Table 6 below outlines the expected increase in service needs attributable to anticipated development. Figure 4.21: Increased service needs attributable to the anticipated development Risks Associated with Lifecycle Options Risk consideration may be mitigated by adhering to Provincial Minimum Maintenance Standards and accepted design/specification guidelines, such as the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, Ontario Provincial Standard Designs/Specifications and Transportation Association of Canada guidelines. The Municipality is also committed to implementing best practices in asset management and sustainability . A risk management strategy is followed to ensure the assets can provide and function at an optimal service level. The likelihood of failure relates to the current condition state of each asset, whether they are in excellent, good, fair, poor or critical condition, as this is a good indicator regarding their future risk of failure. The consequence of failure relates to the magnitude, or overall effect that an asset’s failure will cause. For instance, a small culvert on a low- traffic road may cause a few customers to have no access for a period, whereby a large bridge on a major urban road could have disastrous effects. Factors included when examining the risk of bridge failure include: • Safety • Overall structure condition and age • Natural Hazards and factors relating to Climate Change (wind, snow, ice, flooding, earthquakes) Page 254 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 96 • Traffic growth and future development • Funding available The potential impact of various risk factors include: • Bridges and culverts deteriorate further • The condition of the overall asset portfolio decreases • Bridges and culverts deteriorate beyond a condition where rehabilitation is a viable option • Backlog of work increases • More costly treatments and replacements are required • Structures are closed • Inability to complete all planned projects with allotted budget levels The Municipality maintains lifecycle strategies that are applied to the assets outlined in this asset management plan that maintains the current level of service while lowering the lifecycle costs. Maintained lifecycle strategies help identify and forecast which lifecycle activities are needed to maintain the current level of service while considering the associated risk and costs. These strategies are applied over the asset's lifecycle at various lifecycle stages such as planning and design, construction, operations, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement. Following outlined lifecycle strategies will ensure the quality and effectiveness of our assets, reduce the risk of failure, and will minimize costs Page 255 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 97 Page 256 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 98 Growth Impact of Asset Management Clarington’s Official Plan (2018) In 1996, the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan was adopted by Council as approved by Council of the Regional Municipality of Durham. The Official Plan lays the “foundation” for building a good community. As a foundation, it provides a vision of the Municipality, identifies how the vision can be reached, and establishes a monitoring program for checking progress and making necessary adjustments. The last consolidation of the plan was in June 2018. The vision of the plan can be translated into the following set of guiding principles for Clarington’s future growth and development: • A place where each community can build on its individual character, share a common economic base and a distinct collective image • A place for people to live, work and play in a safe, vibrant, healthy and prosperous environment • A place where people, businesses and governments collectively balance growth with the protection, management and enhancement of rural landscapes, cultural heritage, natural resources, and the natural environment • A place where the built environment emphasizes high quality design and integrates nature in the design process. The priority intensification areas identified as the primary locations to accommodate growth and the greatest mix of uses, heights and densities include: • Urban and village centers • Regional and local corridors • Courtice and Bowmanville transportation hubs • Port Darlington and Port of Newcastle waterfront places The 2018 edition of Clarington’s Official Plan included nine secondary plans. These secondary plans include detailed policies and land use designations to guide development or redevelopment. The nine secondary plans included are as follows. • Bowmanville East Town Centre • Bowmanville West Town Centre • Courtice Main Street2 • Newcastle Village Centre • Port Darlington Neighbourhood • South-West Courtice • Clarington Energy Business Park • Brookhill Neighbourhood • Clarington Technology Business Park Page 257 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 99 Development Charges Study (2020) Under the Development Charges Act, municipalities are required to carry out a Development Charge (DC) Study before implementing fees. A DC Study looks at future population growth within a community and the infrastructure necessary to support this growth. When a building permit is obtained, this information is used to calculate development charge fees applied on a per-unit residential growth or per square metre non-residential growth. The Municipality of Clarington engaged the services of Watson and Associates Economists Ltd. to prepare 2020 DC study and update the Municipality’s existing DC By-law in January 2021. Growth is a critical infrastructure demand driver for most infrastructure services. As such, the Municipality must not only account for the lifecycle cost for its existing asset portfolio but those of any anticipated and forecasted capital projects associated specifically with growth. Clarington has experienced rapid population growth , and its infrastructure investments reflect this trend. Clarington’s 2020 Development Charges Background Study can be found at https://www.clarington.net/en/business-and-development/Development-Charges.aspx The study provides detailed listings of capital investment requirements and p rojects for the next ten years. A summation of estimated growth capital investment is depicted in the chart below. 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Storm $496,6 $496,6 $496,6 $496,6 $496,6 $496,6 $496,6 $496,6 $496,6 $496,6 $496,6 Roads $8,261 $14,78 $18,30 $9,909 $9,398 $6,663 $15,56 $5,048 $9,321 $15,08 $20,36 Bridges & Culverts $2,225 $2,503 $2,987 $286,0 $286,0 $286,0 $15,00 $1,108 $- $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 Gross Capital Cost Growth Related Projects Page 258 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 100 The gross capital costs included in the ten-year forecast represent both development charge funding along with municipal funds. Much of the growth capital investment will be funded from the collection of development charge revenue. Page 259 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 101 Page 260 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 102 Appendices Appendix 1: Storm Water 10-year Replacement Forecast As the following table indicates, there are no end-of-life replacements after the year 2028. This isn’t an error but rather a transition period from when Clarington used clay as CSP assets to when the municipality started using concrete. Concrete assets have a much longer useful life. Asset Asset Description Asset Type Event Date Event Cost 41428 - B21- 075 Alexander Blvd. Conduit 2021 $ 3,891 45204 - B21- 081 Alexander Blvd. Conduit 2021 4,120 45205 - B21- 077 Alexander Blvd. Conduit 2021 12,382 45206 - B21- 079 Alexander Blvd. Conduit 2021 14,665 41401 - H05- 003 Elgin Lane Conduit 2021 12,682 41402 - H05- 005 Elgin Lane Conduit 2021 24,835 41474 - B17- 001 Hobbs Dr. - Easement Conduit 2021 58,679 41450 - B09- 001 King St. W - Easement Conduit 2021 4,835 41414 - B20- 109 Lambert St. N Conduit 2021 8,698 41415 - B20- 111 Lambert St. N Conduit 2021 2,761 41447 - O04- 003 Main St. Conduit 2021 20,440 41446 - O04- 001 Main St. - Easement Conduit 2021 2,199 41448 - O04- 005 Main St. - Easement Conduit 2021 6,894 41384 - B16- 017 Orchard View Blvd Conduit 2021 22,352 41405 - B16- 015 Orchard View Blvd Conduit 2021 19,935 Page 261 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 103 Asset Asset Description Asset Type Event Date Event Cost 45207 - B14- 095 Parkway Cres. Conduit 2021 22,110 45208 - B14- 097 Parkway Cres. Conduit 2021 22,783 45209 - B14- 105 Parkway Cres. Conduit 2021 34,900 41389 - H05- 009 Perry Ave. Conduit 2021 25,159 41390 - H05- 007 Perry Ave. Conduit 2021 9,103 41392 - H05- 011 Perry Ave. Conduit 2021 25,773 41437 - B16- 001 Simpson Ave. Conduit 2021 36,521 41439 - B16- 007 Simpson Ave. Conduit 2021 59,151 41441 - B16- 019 Simpson Ave. Conduit 2021 42,178 41395 - B73- 001 Simpson Ave. Conduit 2021 23,380 41440 - B73- 003 Simpson Ave. Conduit 2021 8,809 41406 - B16- 013 Southway Dr. Conduit 2021 13,354 41407 - B14- 041 Southway Dr. Conduit 2021 24,549 41409 - B16- 011 Southway Dr. Conduit 2021 3,534 41410 - B14- 039 Southway Dr. Conduit 2021 14,829 41411 - B16- 009 Southway Dr. Conduit 2021 15,319 41417 - B14- 035 Southway Dr. Conduit 2021 29,952 41418 - B16- 005 Southway Dr. Conduit 2021 3,141 41419 - B14- 037 Southway Dr. Conduit 2021 4,910 41424 - B53- 125 Sunset Rd. Conduit 2021 45,263 41425 - B25- 011 Third St. Conduit 2021 6,585 41426 - B25- 009 Third St. Conduit 2021 12,140 Page 262 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 104 Asset Asset Description Asset Type Event Date Event Cost 41427 - B25- 007 Third St. Conduit 2021 13,372 41429 - B25- 005 Third St. Conduit 2021 24,483 41431 - B25- 003 Third St. Conduit 2021 8,846 41458 - B04- 001 Scugog St. - Easement Conduit 2022 38,138 41397 - B07- 013 King St. W - Easement Conduit 2023 3,697 41461 - B07- 003 Roenigk Dr. Conduit 2023 1,458 41462 - B07- 001 Roenigk Dr. - Easement Conduit 2023 8,844 41463 - O07- 003 Sommerville Dr. - Easement Conduit 2026 10,678 41465 - O07- 001 Sommerville Dr. - Easement Conduit 2026 5,589 49601 - B21- 075 Alexander Blvd. Maintenance Hole 2026 2,177 49602 - B21- 077 Alexander Blvd. Maintenance Hole 2026 2,177 49603 - B21- 079 Alexander Blvd Maintenance Hole 2026 2,177 49604 - B21- 081 Alexander Blvd. Maintenance Hole 2026 2,177 59655 - CB- 4607 Alexander Blvd Catch Basin 2026 2,177 59656 - CB- 4606 Alexander Blvd Catch Basin 2026 2,177 59657 - CB- 4605 Alexander Blvd Catch Basin 2026 2,177 41391 - B35- 015 Baseline Rd. Conduit 2027 24,187 41436 - B35- 011 Baseline Rd. Conduit 2027 18,624 41438 - B35- 013 Baseline Rd. Conduit 2027 35,158 41444 - B35- 009 Baseline Rd. Conduit 2027 12,185 41445 - B35- 007 Baseline Rd. Conduit 2027 39,307 41454 - B35- 005 Baseline Rd. Conduit 2027 25,783 Page 263 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 105 Asset Asset Description Asset Type Event Date Event Cost 41472 - B35- 001 Baseline Rd. Conduit 2027 3,628 41381 - C41- 001 Nash Rd. Conduit 2027 4,319 41394 - C42- 003 Nash Rd. Conduit 2027 2,419 41396 - C42- 001 Nash Rd. Conduit 2027 3,663 41442 - C15- 001 Nash Rd. Conduit 2027 3,887 41471 - B35- 003 Simpson Ave. Conduit 2027 16,067 41422 - C08- 001 Valley Crest Dr. - Easement Conduit 2028 13,440 41433 - N02- 001 Wilmot St. Conduit 2028 6,591 41468 - C06- 001 Pinedale SWM 17 - Inflow Conduit 2028 15,419 Page 264 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 106 Appendix 2: Road Assets 10-year Replacement Forecast Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 3660 - Darlington Park Rd Darlington Park Rd at Courtice Rd to West End (Darlington Prov Park) 2021 $ 377,000 3663 - Pinedale Cr Pinedale Cr at Glen Abbey Dr to Pinedale Cr 2021 229,125 3677 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Trulls Rd to Courtice Rd 2021 268,125 3700 - Beechnut Cr Beechnut Cr at Sandringham Dr to Sandringham Dr 2021 138,775 3704 - Parklawn Dr Parklawn Dr at Stuart Rd to Sandringham Dr 2021 109,525 3733 - Thornbury Ct Thornbury Ct at Robert Adams Dr to West End Cul-de-Sac 2021 20,475 3737 - Saddlebrook Ct Saddlebrook Ct at Robert Adams Dr to South End Cul-de-Sac 2021 50,375 3770 - Barrington Pl Barrington Pl at Nash Rd to East End Cul-de-Sac 2021 24,700 3843 - West Townline Rd West Townline Rd at Southport Dr to South End (23 m S Drwy #1411) 2021 48,750 3851 - West Townline Rd West Townline Rd at Bloor St to Gord Vinson Ave 2021 80,275 3886 - Courtice Rd Courtice Rd at 20m N of CNR Underpass - South End 2021 143,184 3888 - Cigas Rd Cigas Rd at Trulls Rd to Marnie Dr 2021 122,525 3891 - Marnie Dr Marnie Dr at Baseline Rd to Cigas Rd 2021 43,225 3895 - Progress Dr Progress Dr at Baseline Rd to Courtice Ct 2021 48,750 3897 - Courtice Ct Courtice Ct at McNight Rd to West End Cul -de- Sac 2021 156,325 3932 - George St George St at North St to Manvers Rd 2021 46,800 3935 - Monroe St Monroe St at Mill Street St N to East End (15 m E Drwy #45) 2021 35,100 Page 265 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 107 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 3938 - George St George St at Mill St N to Beaver St N 2021 37,375 3964 - Hart Ct Hart Ct at Chester Ln to East End Cul-de-Sac 2021 36,400 3969 - Lakeview Rd Lakeview Rd at Sunset Blvd to Sunset Blvd 2021 119,600 3970 - Sunset Blvd Sunset Blvd at Lakeview Heights to Robert St W 2021 231,725 3973 - James St W James St W at Church St to West End (5 m W Drwy #104) 2021 32,825 3980 - Caroline St Caroline St at Baldwin St to Church St 2021 37,050 3982 - Caroline St Caroline St at Mill St to Beaver St S 2021 37,050 4001 - Amos St Amos St at Toronto St to South End (10 m S Drwy #624) 2021 24,050 4016 - Lakeshore Rd Lakeshore Rd at Boulton St to 400m E of Boulton St 2021 130,000 4088 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Duke St to Liberty St 2021 51,000 4090 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Simpson Ave to Mearns Crt 2021 198,250 4097 - Concession St E Concession St E at Lambs Rd to Providence Rd 2021 269,750 4100 - Simpson Ave Simpson Ave at Baseline Rd to South End Turnaround 2021 76,050 4120 - Waverley Rd Waverley Rd at Martin Rd to Spry Ave 2021 33,475 4166 - Victoria St Victoria St at Ontario St to Liberty St 2021 52,650 4169 - Albert St Albert St at Duke St to Ontario St 2021 38,350 4170 - Albert St Albert St at Ontario St to Brown St 2021 39,000 4171 - Albert St Albert St at Brown St to Liberty St 2021 31,525 4174 - Durham St Durham St at Duke St to Ontario St 2021 38,350 4192 - Brown St Brown St at Victoria St to Queen St 2021 98,475 4197 - Queen St Queen St at Lambert St S to St George St 2021 36,400 4204 - Stevens Rd Stevens Rd at Martin Rd to Munday Ct 2021 38,675 Page 266 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 108 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4208 - Luverme Ct Luverme Ct at Martin Rd to East End Cul -de-Sac 2021 33,800 4213 - Wellington St Wellington St at Liberty St to East End Turnaround 2021 24,700 4237 - Concession St Concession St at Soper Creek Dr to Lambs Rd 2021 157,625 4240 - Odell St Odell St at High St to West End 2021 24,375 4250 - Rehder Ave Rehder Ave at Scugog St to 200m W of Scugog St 2021 68,900 4254 - Edsall Ave Edsall Ave at Scugog St to Rehder Ave 2021 81,575 4256 - Second St Second St at Scugog St to Prospect St 2021 38,025 4266 - Third St Third St at High St to Bernard St 2021 135,525 4276 - Sunicrest Blvd Sunicrest Blvd at Shoreview Dr to Liberty St 2021 78,000 4305 - Queen Av Queen Av at Queen St to South End 2021 36,725 4334 - High St High St at Concession St to North End 2021 52,000 4358 - Parkway Av Parkway Av at Parkway Cr to Parkway Cr 2021 87,750 4361 - Flett St Flett St at Southway Dr to Parkway Cr 2021 29,250 4364 - Nelson St Nelson St at Liberty St to East End 2021 33,475 4369 - Lambert St N Lambert St N at King St to Church St 2021 39,650 4374 - Frank St Frank St at Prince St to King St 2021 82,225 4438 - King St W King St W at Reg Rd 57 to Roenigk Dr 2021 310,000 4445 - Waverley Rd Waverley Rd at Energy Dr to South End 2021 84,500 4449 - King St King St at Haines St to 148m W of Haines St 2021 62,900 4502 - Clarington Blvd Clarington Blvd at Stevens Rd to North End Temporary Cul-de-Sac 2021 70,525 4525 - Mill Ln Mill Ln at West Scugog Ln to West Scugog Ln 2021 137,150 4571 - Somerville Dr Somerville Dr at Main St to East End 2021 104,000 Page 267 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 109 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4579 - Princess St Princess St at Leigh St to East End 2021 33,475 4587 - Church St Church St at Somerville Dr to Cobbledick St 2021 85,150 4588 - Church St Church St at Cobbledick St to Station St 2021 67,600 4593 - Park St Park St at Church St to East End (Gate to Orono Park) 2021 57,200 4598 - Church St Church St at Park St to South End 2021 29,250 4608 - Tamblyn Rd Tamblyn Rd at 454m N of Highway 35 to Conc Rd 6 2021 203,125 4618 - Old Scugog Rd Old Scugog Rd at Edmonson Av to North Limit of Hampton 2021 165,100 4644 - Millstream Ln Millstream Ln at Mill Dam to Old Scugog Rd 2021 65,000 4651 - Old Mill St Old Mill St at Kendal Church St to Newtonville Rd 2021 134,225 4690 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at Highway 35 to Arthur St 2021 318,825 4816 - Mosport Rd Mosport Rd at Conc Rd 8 to 1600m N of Conc Rd 8 2021 574,600 4839 - Tamblyn Rd Tamblyn Rd at Taunton Rd to 155m N of Taunton Rd 2021 50,375 4849 - Golf Course Rd Golf Course Rd at Highway 2 to Bridge 2021 343,200 4850 - Golf Course Rd Golf Course Rd at Bridge to Conc Rd 3 2021 326,625 4921 - Concession St E Concession St E at Bragg Rd to Darlington Clarke Townline 2021 267,800 4935 - Gearing's Ln Gearings Ln at Tooley Rd to North End Cul-de- Sac 2021 60,450 4951 - Firner St Firner St at Trulls Rd to West End (50 m W Drwy #65) 2021 129,025 4952 - Bradley Blvd Bradley Blvd at Trulls Rd to East End (50 m E Drwy #63) 2021 136,825 4955 - Conc Rd 6 Conc Rd 6 at West Townline Rd to 0.1km W of Langmaid Rd 2021 357,500 5039 - Conc Rd 8 Conc Rd 8 at Regional Rd 57 to Lettner Rd Road Allowance 2021 253,500 5040 - Conc Rd 8 Conc Rd 8 at Lettner Rd Road Allowance to Middle Rd 2021 268,775 5082 - Tooley Rd Tooley Rd at McLean Rd to Pebblestone Rd 2021 363,675 Page 268 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 110 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 5090 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at Pebblestone Rd to 900m N of Pebblestone Rd 2021 293,150 5103 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at Highway 2 to Nash Rd 2021 260,650 5104 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at Nash Rd to 600m N of Nash Rd 2021 195,000 5105 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at 1300m N of Nash Rd to Taunton Rd 2021 938,600 5115 - Rundle Rd Rundle Rd at Highway 2 to Nash Rd 2021 343,850 5142 - Maryleah Ct Maryleah Ct at Old Scugog Rd to West End Cul- de-Sac 2021 39,650 5143 - Glenelge Ct Glenelge Ct at Old Scugog Rd to West End Cul- de-Sac 2021 22,425 5145 - Craig Ct Craig Ct at Old Scugog Rd to East End Cul-de- Sac 2021 34,125 5146 - Buttery Ct Buttery Ct at Old Scugog Rd to East End Cul-de- Sac 2021 38,025 5160 - Old Scugog Rd Old Scugog Rd at Reg Rd 3 to Salter Ct 2021 214,825 5166 - Old Scugog Rd Old Scugog Rd at Conc Rd 10 to Scugog Boundary Rd 2021 331,500 5203 - Darlington/Clarke T/L Darlington/Clarke T/L at Highway 2 to South End 2021 205,400 5237 - Salter Ct Salter Ct at Old Scugog Rd to West End Turnaround 2021 109,850 5708 - Mills St Orono Mills St Orono at Main St to Pigott Ln 2021 224,250 54531 - Concession St Concession St at Appleblossom to Mann St 2021 71,500 54565 - Pethick St Pethick St at Prince William Blvd to 72m S of Hwy #2 2021 55,250 54573 - Rudel Rd Rudel Rd at Edward St to Hwy#2 2021 94,250 54584 - Waverley Rd Waverley Rd at Hwy 401 to Energy Dr 2021 46,750 3710 - Nash Rd Nash Rd at Harry Gay Dr to Hancock Rd 2021 99,775 3714 - Strathallan Dr Strathallan Dr at Stirling Ave to Trulls Rd 2021 120,575 4095 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Bowmanville East Limits (Haines St) to Lambs Rd 2021 134,875 4283 - Scugog St Scugog St at King St W to Church St 2021 59,500 Page 269 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 111 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4448 - King St King St at Mearns Av to 332m E of Mearns Av 2021 141,100 4688 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at Pollard Rd to Lockhart Rd 2021 269,100 4920 - Concession St E Concession St E at Providence Rd to Bragg Rd 2021 266,825 5091 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at 900m N of Pebblestone Rd to Taunton Rd 2021 372,125 5124 - Holt Rd Holt Rd at Highway 2 to Nash Rd 2021 483,275 54579 - Simpson Ave Simpson Ave at Hobb Dr to King St 2021 48,750 3644 - Scugog Boundary Rd Scugog Boundary Rd at Cochrane Rd to 600m E of Cochrane Rd 2021 53,910 3849 - West Townline Rd West Townline Rd at Olive Ave to South End (10 m S Drwy #89) 2021 7,650 3931 - Allen's Ln Allens Ln at North St to West End (Drwy #110) 2021 4,860 4081 - West Beach Rd West Beach Rd at Cove Rd to East End (gate) 2021 41,850 4242 - Sturrock Rd Sturrock Rd at Scugog St to West End 2021 11,070 4605 - Pigott Ln Pigott Ln at Orono Mill Ln to East End 2021 16,470 4649 - Water St Water St at Newtonville Rd to Hoy St 2021 27,720 4652 - Monck St Monck St at Kendal Church St to Newtonville Rd 2021 35,640 4654 - Hoy St Hoy St at Water St to Old Mill Street St 2021 9,360 4655 - Hoy St Hoy St at Old Mill St to Monck St 2021 10,350 4656 - Dickey St Dickey St at Water St to Old Mill St 2021 10,980 4657 - Dickey St Dickey St at Old Mill St to Monck St 2021 10,260 4790 - Conc Rd 8 Conc Rd 8 at 447m E of Maynard Rd N to Carscadden Rd S 2021 84,600 4807 - Curve Inn Rd Curve Inn Rd at Highway 2 to East End (30 m E Drwy #88) 2021 46,260 4808 - Curve Inn Rd Curve Inn Rd at Lovekin Rd to Curve Inn Rd 2021 15,480 4862 - Old Sideroad 16/17 Old Sideroad 16/17 at Morgans Rd to Southeast End 2021 13,230 Page 270 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 112 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 5080 - Leask Rd Leask Rd at Conc Rd 6 to North End Cul-de-sac 2021 89,460 5179 - Mearns Av Mearns Av at Conc Rd 4 to South End (10 m S Drwy #3732) 2021 44,910 54941 - Rundle Rd Rundle Rd at Taunton to Concession Rd 4 2021 42,300 3953 - Rudell Rd Rudell Rd at Hart Blvd to Edward St 2021 81,250 4074 - Lake Rd Lake Rd at Port Darlington Rd to East End Cul- de-Sac 2021 269,425 4086 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Hunt St to Duke St 2021 37,050 4235 - Concession St Concession St at Mann St to Kershaw St 2021 68,250 4347 - Simpson Av Simpson Av at 230m N of Baseline Rd to 427m N of Baseline Rd 2021 63,050 4442 - King St W King St W at George St to Ontario St 2021 56,950 4444 - King St W King St W at Ontario St to Liberty St 2021 148,325 4501 - Clarington Blvd Clarington Blvd at Uptown Av to Stevens Rd 2021 44,850 54526 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at 100m E of West Scugog Ln to West Scugog Ln 2021 97,500 54536 - Fenning Dr Fenning Dr at Southfield Ave to 47m S of Cornish Dr 2021 61,750 4572 - Somerville Dr Somerville Dr at Station St to West End Turnaround 2022 22,004 4872 - Hillen Rd Hillen Rd at Conc Rd 6 to North End (Drwy #6168) 2022 32,679 4881 - Newtonville Rd Newtonville Rd at Lakeshore Rd to Conc Rd 1 2022 256,750 5079 - Fices Rd Fices Rd at Taunton Rd to South End (45 m S Drwy #4426) 2022 100,378 5132 - Maple Grove Rd Maple Grove Rd at 433m S of Baseline Rd to Baseline Rd 2022 40,544 5151 - Old Scugog Rd Old Scugog Rd at North Limit of Hampton to Conc Rd 6 2022 36,237 5201 - Murphy Rd Murphy Rd at 528m N Reg Rd 20 to 2812m N of Reg Rd 20 2022 1,489,686 3696 - Sandringham Dr Sandringham Dr at Highway 2 to Windham Cr 2022 185,972 3713 - Strathallan Dr Strathallan Dr at Sandringham Dr to Stirling Ave 2022 78,446 Page 271 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 113 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 3747 - Varcoe Rd Varcoe Rd at Highway 2 to Nash Rd 2022 106,849 3883 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at Nash Rd to George Reynolds Dr 2022 206,597 3904 - Sandringham Dr Sandringham Dr at Windham Cr to Yorkville Dr 2022 145,396 4102 - Martin Rd Martin Rd at Squires Gate Dr to Alonna St 2022 73,374 4121 - Waverley Rd Waverley Rd at Spry Ave to Quinn Dr 2022 138,633 4420 - Aspen Springs Dr Aspen Springs Dr at Bonnycastle Dr to West Side Dr 2022 179,209 4446 - King St E King St E at Liberty St to St George St 2022 185,711 4447 - King St E King St E at Simpsin Av to Mearns Ave 2022 176,868 4766 - Conc Rd 8 Conc Rd 8 at 150m W of Mosport Rd to Leskard Rd 2022 211,331 4964 - Conc Rd 6 Conc Rd 6 at Rundle Rd to Holt Rd 2022 268,475 54514 - Aspen Springs Dr Aspen Springs Dr at Reg Rd 57 to Bonnycastle Dr 2022 57,482 54517 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Liberty St to Simpson Ave 2022 74,389 54543 - King St E King St E at St George St to Simpson Ave 2022 88,434 54575 - Scugog St Scugog St at Church St to Wellington St 2022 50,720 59296 - Tooley Rd Tooley Rd at Nash Rd to 75m N of Nash Rd 2022 25,360 59297 - Tooley Rd Tooley Rd at 430m N of Nash Rd to McLean Rd 2022 201,864 59352 - Liberty St N 130m S of Conc Rd 6 to Conc Rd 6 2022 43,957 4021 - Riley Rd Riley Rd at Lakeshore Rd to Metcalf St 2022 108,899 4650 - Old Mill St Old Mill St at Kendal Church St to West End 2022 12,173 4663 - Lakeshore Rd Lakeshore Rd at Jaynes Rd to 909m E of Jaynes Rd 2022 75,845 4818 - Mosport Rd Mosport Rd at Conc Rd 9 to 1300m N of Conc. Rd. 9 2022 134,836 4832 - Leskard Rd Leskard Rd at 160m N of Conc Rd 8 to Skelding Rd 2022 184,463 Page 272 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 114 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4854 - Brownsville Rd Brownsville Rd at Highway 2 to South End Turnaround (200m S Drwy #1545) 2022 62,268 4875 - Ovens Rd Ovens Rd at Highway 2 to South End Turnaround 2022 58,710 4890 - Shiloh Rd Shiloh Rd at Conc Rd 5 to Conc Rd 6 2022 202,535 5110 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at 150m N of Dorest St to Conc Rd 7 2022 92,700 55119 - Leskard Rd Leskard Rd at Conc Rd 8 to 160m N of Conc Rd 8 2022 14,982 56733 - Stapleton Rd Stapleton Rd at 200m N of Conc Rd 3 to Conc Rd 4 2022 171,354 3676 - Darlington Blvd Darlington Blvd at 120m S of Highway 2 to South End (Drwy #60) 2022 206,259 3678 - Robert Adams Dr Robert Adams Dr at Prestonvale Rd to Mulholland Ct 2022 170,079 3697 - Sandringham Dr Sandringham Dr at Yorkville Dr to Trulls Rd 2022 192,734 3712 - Glenabbey Dr Glenabbey Dr at Robert Adams Dr to Prestonvale Rd 2022 114,964 3788 - George Reynolds Dr George Reynolds Dr at Devondale St to Julia Crt 2022 135,252 3875 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at Bloor St to 700m N of Bloor St 2022 242,101 3881 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at Highway 2 to Nash Rd 2022 121,051 3928 - North St North St at Highway 2 to Wilmot St 2022 54,101 4234 - Concession St Concession St at Liberty St to Appleblossom Blvd 2022 71,007 4346 - Simpson Av Simpson Av at Baseline Rd to 230m N of Baseline Rd 2022 78,784 4394 - Trudeau Dr Trudeau Dr at Concession St to 430m S of Concession St 2022 30,432 4421 - Bonnycastle Dr Bonnycastle Dr at West Side Dr to Prestonway Dr 2022 145,396 4425 - Prestonway Dr Prestonway Dr at Bonnycastle Dr to Martin Rd 2022 51,734 4462 - Freeland Av Freeland Av at Liberty St to Mearns Av 2022 286,734 4500 - Clarington Blvd Clarington Blvd at Highway 2 to Uptown Av 2022 48,014 4924 - Nash Rd Nash Rd at 422m E of Solina Rd to Rundle Rd 2022 134,914 Page 273 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 115 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4963 - Conc Rd 6 Conc Rd 6 at 432m E of Solina Rd to Rundle Rd 2022 132,547 5108 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at Conc Rd 6 to Odlum St 2022 185,972 54519 - Bonnycastle Dr Bonnycastle Dr at Prestonway Dro to Hartwell Ave 2022 57,482 54520 - Bonnycastle Dr Bonnycastle Dr at Hartwell Ave to Aspen Springs Dr 2022 81,151 55090 - Yorkville Dr Yorkville Dr at Granville Dr to Trulls Rd 2022 101,439 3647 - Hill St Hill St at Reid Rd to Newtonville Rd 2022 82,493 3873 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at Baseline Rd to Bloor St 2022 170,137 4625 - Liberty St Liberty St at North Division St to East End (20 m E Drwy #37) 2022 10,487 4627 - Millville Av Millville Av at Old Scugog Rd to East End (Drwy #64) 2022 34,926 4647 - King Ln King Ln at Millstream Ln to 370m N of Millstream Ln 2022 34,458 4653 - Kendal Church St Kendal Church St at Old Mill St to Ganaraska Rd 2022 28,746 4658 - Lakeshore Rd Lakeshore Rd at Riley Rd to Stephenson Rd 2022 111,895 4667 - Lakeshore Rd Lakeshore Rd at Lancaster Rd to 500m E of Lancaster Rd 2022 41,200 4683 - Lovekin Rd Lovekin Rd at Ramps to Hwy 35/115 to Cobble- Dick Rd 2022 87,924 4697 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at Elliott Rd to Gilmore Rd 2022 77,531 4824 - Squair Rd Squair Rd at Conc Rd 4 to Conc Rd 5 2022 11,705 4842 - Gamsby Rd Gamsby Rd at Conc Rd 5 to Conc Rd 6 2022 214,801 4847 - Vickers Rd Vickers Rd at Conc Rd 5 to Conc Rd 6 2022 212,835 4863 - Morgans Rd Morgans Rd at Highway 2 to Conc Rd 3 2022 193,452 4864 - Morgans Rd Morgans Rd at Conc Rd 3 to Cowanville Rd 2022 95,228 4865 - Morgans Rd Morgans Rd at Cowanville Rd to Conc Rd 4 2022 96,164 4876 - Reid Rd Reid Rd at Highway 2 to 1598m N of Highway 2 2022 149,630 Page 274 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 116 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4877 - Reid Rd Reid Rd at 1598m N of Highway 2 to 2872m N of Highway 2 2022 119,292 4880 - White Rd White Rd at Ganaraska Rd to Conc Rd 8 2022 165,174 4883 - Thompson Rd Thompson Rd at Ganaraska Rd to The Dell Rd 2022 168,451 4884 - The Dell Rd The Dell Rd at Thompson Rd to Thertell Rd 2022 116,296 4886 - Mercer Rd Mercer Rd at Ganaraska Rd to Thertell Rd 2022 256,937 4891 - Shiloh Rd Shiloh Rd at Conc Rd 6 to Ganaraska Rd 2022 216,861 4897 - East Townline Rd East Townline Rd at Lakeshore Rd to Conc Rd 1 2022 175,661 4905 - Cold Springs Camp Rd Cold Springs Camp Rd at Thertell Rd to North End (Drwy #10585) 2022 98,692 5098 - Hancock Rd Hancock Rd at Highway 2 to Nash Rd 2022 53,279 5100 - Washington Rd Washington Rd at Taunton Rd to North End (14 m N Drwy #5221) 2022 44,477 5250 - Elliot St Elliot St at Old Scugog Rd to Cartwright St 2022 11,705 5251 - Mary St Mary St at Cartwright St to West End (Drwy #33) 2022 6,086 59203 - Brown Rd Brown Rd at 334m N of Conc Rd 7 to Conc Rd 8 2022 191,954 3679 - Robert Adams Dr Robert Adams Dr at Hemmingway Dr to Worthington Dr 2023 120,712 3701 - Glenabbey Dr Glenabbey Dr at Sandringham Dr to South End Temporary Cul-de-Sac (Drwy #218) 2023 142,786 3726 - Granville Dr Granville Dr at Yorksville Dr to John Walker Cr 2023 28,281 3863 - Prestonvale Rd Prestonvale Rd at Glenabbey Dr to Claret Rd 2023 225,215 3865 - Prestonvale Rd Prestonvale Rd at Claret Rd to Phair Av 2023 140,371 3867 - Prestonvale Rd Prestonvale Rd at Phair Ave to Highway 2 2023 64,946 3876 - Fenning Dr Fenning Dr at Gord Vinson Ave to Montague Av 2023 47,250 3961 - Edward St Edward St at Foster Creek Dr to Baldwin St 2023 53,113 3971 - Robert St W Robert St W at Sunset Blvd to Mill St S 2023 77,946 Page 275 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 117 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4297 - Ontario St Ontario St at Queen St to King St 2023 41,387 4401 - Soper Creek Dr Soper Creek Dr at Mearns Av to Downham Dr 2023 108,296 4419 - Hartwell Av Hartwell Av at Martin Rd to Bonnycastle Dr 2023 43,456 4440 - King St W King St W at Scugog St to Temperance St 2023 112,753 4545 - Rustwood St Rustwood St at Boswell Dr to West End (43 m West of Hammond Street) 2023 66,564 5213 - Liberty St N Liberty St N at Conc Rd 6 to Conc Rd 7 2023 671,161 54569 - Robert Adams Dr Robert Adams Dr at Glen Abbey Dr to Hemingway Dr 2023 75,876 54578 - Simpson Ave Simpson Ave at Prince St to Hobb Dr 2023 34,489 55321 - Energy Dr Energy Dr at 120m W of Waverly Rd to Waverly Rd 2023 54,122 4528 - Green Rd Green Rd at Baseline Rd to Remmington St 2023 141,406 54889 - Robert Adams Dr Robert Adams Dr at 30m S of Glenabbey Dr to Meadowglade Rd 2023 58,632 54947 - Old Scugog Rd Old Scugog Rd at Concession Rd 6 to 200 m N of Concession Rd 6 2023 31,040 3787 - George Reynolds Dr George Reynolds Dr at Nash Rd to Devondale St 2024 106,944 3834 - Sandringham Dr Sandringham Dr at Avondale Dr to Courtice Rd 2024 90,762 3859 - Prestonvale Rd Prestonvale Rd at Baseline Rd to 1100m N of Baseline Rd 2024 396,116 3905 - George Reynolds Dr George Reynolds Dr at Julia Crt to Firwood Av 2024 147,752 3948 - King Ave W King Ave W at North St to Mill St 2024 75,635 3950 - King Av E King Av E at Beaver St to Arthur St 2024 66,840 4034 - Resnik Dr Resnik Dr at Arthur St to Andrew St 2024 129,811 4099 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at 153m E of Spry Av to Hunt St 2024 155,140 4124 - Rhonda Ave Rhonda Ave at Waverly Rd to Lawrence Gate 2024 235,700 4130 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at West Scugog Ln to 110m W of Middle Rd 2024 151,270 Page 276 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 118 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4348 - Simpson Av Simpson Av at 427m N of Baseline Rd to Southway Dr 2024 66,840 4488 - Simpson Av Simpson Av at Southway Dr to Prince St 2024 221,628 5159 - Old Scugog Rd Old Scugog Rd at 500m S of Regional Rd 3 to Regional Rd 3 2024 195,595 5676 - Given Rd Given Rd at Rudell Rd to West End 2024 98,566 54576 - Scugog St Scugog St at Wellington St to Odell St 2024 63,322 55115 - Waverley Rd Waverley Rd at Lawrence Cr to Roenigk Dr 2024 151,270 55331 - Rosswell Dr Rosswell Dr at Gord Vinson Ave to Bloor St 2024 42,215 5002 - Conc Rd 7 Conc Rd 7 at Baker School Rd to Holt Rd 2024 289,172 3692 - Claret Rd Claret Rd at Prestonvale Rd to Sandringham Dr 2024 45,733 3892 - Osbourne Rd Osbourne Rd at Energy Dr to Megawatt Dr 2024 144,234 4078 - West Beach Rd West Beach Rd at Port Darlington Rd to Cove Rd 2024 487,933 4101 - Martin Rd Martin Rd at Baseline Rd to Squires Gate Dr 2024 85,133 4151 - Rhonda Blvd Rhonda Blvd at Lawrence Gate to Old Highway 2 2024 200,872 4236 - Concession St Concession St at Mearns Ave to Soper Creek Dr 2024 127,348 4509 - Clarington Blvd Clarington Blvd at Highway 2 to Prince William Blvd 2024 94,280 54585 - West Side Dr West Side Dr at Aspen Springs Dr to Bonnycastle Dr 2024 73,876 3949 - King Ave W King Ave W at Mill St to Beaver St 2025 53,962 4187 - Ontario St Ontario St at Liberty St to Nelson St 2025 68,177 4189 - Ontario St Ontario St at Nelson St to Albert St 2025 86,118 3927 - Rudell Rd Rudell Rd at Highway 2 to Given Rd 2025 44,853 5001 - Conc Rd 7 Conc Rd 7 at Solina Rd to Baker School Rd 2025 295,314 55092 - Meadowglade Rd Meadowglade Rd at Robert Adams Dr to Prestonvale Rd 2025 86,118 Page 277 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 119 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 55118 - Green Rd Green Rd at Nash Rd to 875m N of Ross Wright Ave 2025 165,060 5692 - Bons Ave Bons Ave at Liberty St N to West End 2025 150,707 59304 - Creek Service Rd Creek Service Rd at Roenigk Dr to East End 2025 15,899 3727 - Granville Dr Granville Dr at John Walter Cr to John Walter Cr 2025 34,088 3877 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at 700m N of Bloor St to Avondale Dr 2025 83,248 3952 - Rudell Rd Rudell Rd at Sunset Blvd to Hart Blvd 2025 39,471 3976 - Edward St Edward St at Baldwin St to Church St 2025 41,983 4007 - Mill St S Mill St S at Metcalf St to Boulton St 2025 268,402 4087 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Spry Ave to 153m E of Spry Ave 2025 54,900 4122 - Waverley Rd Waverley Rd at Quinn Dr to Lawrence Cr 2025 89,707 4146 - Lawrence Gate Lawrence Gate at Rhonda Blvd to Waverly Rd 2025 35,524 4196 - Queen St Queen St at Liberty St to Lambert St S 2025 34,806 4198 - Church St Church St at Scugog St to Temperance St 2025 120,207 4199 - Church St Church St at Temperance St to Division St 2025 49,877 4201 - Church St Church St at Liberty St to St. George St 2025 76,789 4495 - Boswell Dr Boswell Dr at Ivory Crt to Rustwood St 2025 200,943 4529 - Bannister St Bannister St at West Side Dr to Millburn Dr S 2025 133,842 4686 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at Darlington Clarke Townline to 300m E of Darlington Clarke Townline 2025 154,654 4689 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at Lockhart Rd to Highway 35 2025 342,320 4915 - Bloor St Bloor St at Courtice Rd to Hancock Rd 2025 298,902 54521 - Boswell Dr Boswell Dr at Rustwood Cr to Green Rd 2025 104,060 54532 - Concession St Concession St at Kershaw St to Mearns Ave 2025 64,589 Page 278 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 120 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 54545 - King St W King St W at Temperance St to Division St 2025 65,693 54546 - King St W King St W at Division St to George St 2025 61,000 54570 - Robert Adams Dr Robert Adams Dr at Worthington Dr to Mulholland Ct 2025 61,000 57475 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Mearns Rd to Caristrap St 2025 64,589 4521 - Longworth Ave Longworth Ave at Mearns Ave to West End 2025 148,195 4191 - Ontario St Ontario St at Albert St to Queen St 2026 135,421 5479 - Port of Newcastle Dr Port of Newcastle Drive at 35m N of Hodnett Cr to Schooner Ln 2026 164,701 54907 - Bons Ave Bons Ave at Scugog St to 45m E of Honeyman Dr 2026 150,061 3862 - Prestonvale Rd Prestonvale Rd at Bloor St to Meadowglade Rd 2026 142,741 3879 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at Avondale Dr to Sandringham Dr 2026 139,081 3903 - Prestonvale Rd Prestonvale Rd at Meadowglade Rd to Glenabbey Dr 2026 95,161 3941 - Beaver St N Beaver St N at King Ave to Andrew St 2026 154,087 4083 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Martin Rd to Spicer Sq 2026 72,469 4123 - Waverley Rd Waverley Rd at Roenigk Dr to Old Highway 2 2026 65,515 4156 - Roenigk Dr Roenigk Dr at King St to 100m S of King St 2026 35,868 4285 - Scugog St Scugog St at Odell St to Meadowview Blvd 2026 255,470 4315 - Temperance St Temperance St at King St to Church St 2026 40,992 4385 - Orchard Park Dr Orchard Park Dr at Mearns Av to Peachtree Cr 2026 124,807 4411 - Apple Blossom Blvd Apple Blossom Blvd at Concession St to Faircombe Cr 2026 127,369 4687 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at 300m E of Darlington Clarke Townline to Pollard Rd 2026 321,350 4911 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Rundle Rd to Holt Rd 2026 303,050 4912 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Holt Rd to Maple Grove Rd 2026 303,050 Page 279 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 121 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4965 - Conc Rd 6 Conc Rd 6 at Holt Rd to Old Scugog Rd 2026 310,004 5212 - Liberty St N Liberty St N at Taunton Rd to 1100m N of Taunton Rd 2026 402,603 54516 - Avondale Dr Avondale Dr at Brownstone Cr to Sandringham Dr 2026 139,081 54552 - Longworth Ave Longworth Ave at Daley Dr to High St 2026 43,920 54553 - Longworth Ave Longworth Ave at High St to Argent St 2026 109,801 54582 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at Sandringham Dr to Strathallan Dr 2026 113,461 54583 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at Strathallan Dr to Hwy#2 2026 87,841 4678 - Conc Rd 1 Conc Rd 1 at Newtonville Rd to Lancaster Rd 2026 301,586 5109 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at Odlum St to 150m N of Dorest St 2026 204,962 54540 - Green Rd Green Rd at Remmington St to McBride Av 2026 106,141 54541 - Green Rd Green Rd at McBride Av to Aspen Springs Dr 2026 65,881 54938 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at Taunton Rd to 750m N of Taunton Rd 2027 279,992 54939 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at 500m S of Concession Rd 6 to Concession Rd 6 2027 165,382 54560 - Mearns Ave Mearns Ave at Freeland Av to Conc Rd 3 2027 89,597 3653 - Gord Vinson Ave Gord Vinson Ave at Townline Rd to Fenning Dr 2028 108,144 3654 - Gord Vinson Ave Gord Vinson Ave at Fenning Dr to Eastfield Cr 2028 65,496 3689 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Solina Rd to Rundle Rd 2028 313,390 3839 - Daisyfield Dr Daisyfield Dr at Trulls Rd to West End Temp Turnaround (20 m W Drwy #117) 2028 157,647 3896 - Avondale Dr Avondale Dr at Trulls Rd to Farmington Dr 2028 110,429 3998 - Toronto St Toronto St at Mill St S to Amos St 2028 36,937 4061 - Brookhouse Dr Brookhouse Dr at Harmer Dr to Edward St 2028 38,079 4084 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Waverly Rd to Spry Ave 2028 159,932 Page 280 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 122 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4092 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Caristrap St to Haines St 2028 90,247 4093 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at West Side Dr to Martin Rd 2028 139,750 4288 - Scugog St Scugog St at Meadowview Blvd to Longworth Ave 2028 99,005 4303 - Centre St Centre St at Carlisle St to Concession St 2028 150,031 4309 - Division St Division St at King St W to Church St 2028 46,076 4320 - Elgin St Elgin St at Wellington St to Concession St 2028 86,058 4377 - Mearns Av Mearns Av at Concession St to Flaxman Av 2028 62,069 4412 - Apple Blossom Blvd Apple Blossom Blvd at Farncomb Cr to Mann St 2028 99,005 4491 - West Side Dr West Side Dr at Bonnycastle to Remmington St 2028 99,005 4493 - West Side Dr West Side Dr at Baseline Rd to Abernethy Cr 2028 160,693 4515 - Longworth Av Longworth Av at 363m E of Regional Rd 57 to Scugog St 2028 245,492 4614 - Old Scugog Rd Old Scugog Rd at Taunton Rd to Millville Av 2028 285,211 4910 - Wilmot Creek Rd Wilmot Creek Rd at Bennett Rd to East End Turnaround 2028 156,885 4914 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at 300m E of Maple Grove to 207m W of Green Rd 2028 125,660 5215 - Conc Rd 7 Conc Rd 7 at Liberty St S to Liberty St N 2028 331,287 54515 - Avondale Dr Avondale Dr at Farmington Dr to Brownstone Cr 2028 60,926 54567 - Prestonvale Rd Prestonvale Rd at Southfield Ave to Bloor St 2028 152,316 54586 - West Side Dr West Side Dr at Remmington St to Abernethy Cr 2028 34,271 55315 - Glenabbey Dr Glenabbey Dr at Townline Rd S to Bruntsfield St 2028 139,369 59247 - Spry Ave Spry Ave at Lawrence Cr to Waverley Rd 2028 102,813 59308 - Queen St Queen St at Queen Ave to Ontario St 2028 90,247 3646 - Rose Cr Rose Cr at Jones Ave to East End (40 m E Drwy #12) 2028 14,552 Page 281 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 123 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 3650 - Paynes Cr Paynes Cr at Highway 2 to Highway 2 2028 73,815 3810 - Glenview Rd Glenview Rd at Jane Ave to Lynwood Ave 2028 11,178 3899 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at Osbourne Rd to South Service Rd 2028 94,166 4474 - Lambs Rd Lambs Rd at Concession St E to CPR Crossing 2028 116,943 4619 - Washington St Washington St at Old Scugog Rd to North Division St 2028 13,287 4648 - King Ln King Ln at 370m N of Millstream Ln to 590m N of Millstream Ln 2028 23,515 4675 - Conc Rd 1 Conc Rd 1 at Morgans Rd to Jaynes Rd 2028 87,207 4677 - Conc Rd 1 Conc Rd 1 at Bellamy Rd to Newtonville Rd 2028 89,632 4782 - Conc Rd 8 Conc Rd 8 at Highway 35 to Dawson Rd 2028 69,597 4797 - Skelding Rd Skelding Rd at Leskard Rd to Best Rd 2028 85,836 4805 - Lovekin Rd Lovekin Rd at Ramps to Hwy 35/115 to South End (20 m S Drwy #205A) 2028 48,296 4814 - Pollard Rd Pollard Rd at Conc Rd 4 to Conc Rd 5 2028 220,600 4817 - Mosport Rd Mosport Rd at 1600m N of Conc Rd 8 to Conc Rd 9 2028 41,336 4852 - Jewel Rd Jewel Rd at Conc Rd 6 to South End (Drwy #5587) 2028 108,613 4856 - Brownsville Rd Brownsville Rd at Highway 2 to North End (Drwy #2525) 2028 129,070 4871 - Cedar Valley Rd Cedar Valley Rd at Conc Rd 4 to 518m N of Conc Rd 4 2028 54,623 4878 - Reid Rd Reid Rd at 2872m N of Highway 2 to Conc Rd 4 2028 171,777 4902 - East Townline Rd East Townline Rd at Conc Rd 5 to North End (Drwy #4855) 2028 167,664 4941 - Conc Rd 4 Conc Rd 4 at Regional Rd 57 to Middle Rd 2028 88,367 5044 - Conc Rd 8 Conc Rd 8 at Liberty St N to Aked Rd 2028 98,068 5073 - West Townline Rd West Townline Rd at Taunton Rd to Coldstream Dr 2028 68,331 5074 - West Townline Rd West Townline Rd at Coldstream Dr to Conc Rd 6 2028 144,887 Page 282 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 124 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 5078 - West Townline Rd West Townline Rd at Conc Rd 9 to Conc Rd 10 2028 233,465 5081 - Cochrane's Rd Cochranes Rd at Conc Rd 10 to North End (15 m N Drwy #10239) 2028 44,183 5173 - Middle Rd Middle Rd at 500m N of Conc Rd 8 to Reg Rd 20 2028 165,239 5174 - Middle Rd Middle Rd at Conc Rd 8 to 500m N of Conc Rd 8 2028 52,092 5180 - Mearns Av Mearns Av at Conc Rd 4 to 1028m N of Conc Rd 4 2028 108,402 5183 - Lambs Rd Lambs Rd at CPR Crossing to Conc Rd 3 2028 105,766 5197 - Longsault Rd Longsault Rd at Boundary Rd to North End (Drwy #10126) 2028 250,759 5740 - Charlesville Lane Charlesville Lane at Nelson Lane to Concession 7 2028 17,926 54954 - Bragg Rd Bragg Rd at Concession Rd 4 to South 2028 105,449 3812 - Lynwood Av Lynwood Av at Westmore St to Glenview Rd 2028 26,468 4079 - Watson Cr Watson Cr at Cedar Crest Beach Rd to 120m N of Cedar Crest Beach Rd 2028 13,814 4466 - Lambs Rd Lambs Rd at Baseline Rd to Highway 2 2028 70,651 4570 - Somerville Dr Somerville Dr at Millpond Rd to Main St 2028 30,475 4607 - Tamblyn Rd Tamblyn Rd at Highway 35 to 454m N of Highway 35 2028 47,874 4623 - Liberty St Liberty St at Old Scugog Rd to North Division St 2028 12,232 4628 - North Division St North Division St at Washington St to Milville Av 2028 32,689 4630 - Ormiston Ln Ormiston Ln at Old Scugog Rd to South Hammerhead 2028 23,937 4633 - Ormiston St Ormiston St at 290m E of Old Scugog Rd to North End (10 m N Drwy #99) 2028 41,652 4666 - Lakeshore Rd Lakeshore Rd at Newtonville Rd to Lancaster Rd 2028 87,418 4676 - Conc Rd 1 Conc Rd 1 at Jaynes Rd to Bellamy Rd 2028 175,784 4684 - Browview Rd Browview Rd at Highway 2 to East End (20 m E Drwy #641) 2028 31,951 4717 - Conc Rd 4 Conc Rd 4 at Elliott Rd to Gilmore Rd 2028 90,054 Page 283 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 125 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4718 - Conc Rd 4 Conc Rd 4 at Gillmore Rd to East Townline Rd 2028 87,839 4725 - Conc Rd 5 Conc Rd 5 at 135m E of Ochonski Rd to Somerville Dr 2028 62,215 4794 - Thertell Rd Thertell Rd at The Dell Rd to Mercer Rd 2028 85,941 4795 - Thertell Rd Thertell Rd at Mercer Rd to Langstaff Rd 2028 86,363 4800 - Conc Rd 10 Conc Rd 10 at Mosport Rd to 500m E of Mosport Rd 2028 64,430 4802 - Conc Rd 10 Conc Rd 10 at Highway 35 to East End Turnaround (135 m E Drwy #3855) 2028 84,992 4806 - Lovekin Rd Lovekin Rd at Ramps to Hwy 35/115 to Curve Inn Rd 2028 47,663 4866 - Maynard Rd Maynard Rd at Conc Rd 8 to North End (Drwy #8318) 2028 69,069 4900 - East Townline Rd East Townline Rd at 5th Line (Hope) to Conc Rd 4 2028 5,483 4904 - Cold Springs Camp Rd Cold Springs Camp Rd at Ganaraska Rd to Thertell Rd 2028 285,768 5047 - Conc Rd 9 Conc Rd 9 at West Townline Rd to 1750m E of West Townline Rd 2028 185,591 5054 - Conc Rd 9 Conc Rd 9 at Ormiston Rd to 358m E of Ormiston Rd 2028 37,751 5086 - Langmaid Rd Langmaid Rd at Conc Rd 7 to 1475m N of Conc Rd 7 2028 156,065 5088 - Langmaid Rd Langmaid Rd at 1475m N of Conc Rd 7 to Regional Rd 3 2028 51,670 5097 - Hancock Rd Hancock Rd at Bloor St to Highway 2 2028 171,988 5131 - Holt Rd Holt Rd at Conc Rd 9 to Conc Rd 9 2028 90,686 5169 - Middle Rd Middle Rd at Conc Rd 4 to Taunton Rd 2028 217,647 5171 - Middle Rd Middle Rd at Conc Rd 6 to Conc Rd 7 2028 217,858 5211 - Darlington/Manvers T/L Darlington/Manvers T/L at Reg Rd 20 to Scugog Boundary Rd 2028 312,868 5234 - Ella Mae Lane Ella Mae Lane at Old Scugog Rd to Reg Rd 3 2028 28,366 5235 - Leslie Wearn St Leslie Wearn St at Reg Rd 3 to Old Scugog Rd 2028 24,675 5714 - Concession 5 Concession 5 at 100m E of Hwy35 to Gamsby Rd 2028 149,738 Page 284 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 126 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 54528 - Conc Rd 9 Conc Rd 9 at 250m W of Enfield Rd to Enfield Rd 2028 31,635 54937 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at Baseline Rd to Baseline Rd 2028 200,354 4282 - Bons Ave. Bons Ave. at 210m W of Scugog St to West Scugog Lane 2029 91,664 5700 - Boswell Dr Boswell Dr at Highway 2 to 340m N of Hwy 2 2029 132,058 53069 - George Reynolds Dr George Reynolds Dr at Sleeman Sq to Courtice Road 2029 198,087 3683 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Courtice Rd to Hancock Rd 2029 319,657 3685 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Hancock Rd to 154m E of Hancock Rd 2029 59,814 3687 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at 154m E of Hancock Rd to Solina Rd 2029 261,397 3861 - Prestonvale Rd Prestonvale Rd at 1100m N of Baseline Rd to Southfield Ave 2029 116,522 3882 - Farmington Dr Farmington Dr at Avondale Dr to South End (30 m S of Wilkens Cresc) 2029 121,182 3979 - Edward St Edward St at Beaver St to Harmer Dr 2029 89,333 3994 - Beaver St S Beaver St S at James St to Caroline St 2029 93,994 4085 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Spicer Sq to Waverly Rd 2029 107,678 4140 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at 385m E of Liberty St to Mearns Ave 2029 168,568 4147 - Old Highway 2 Old Highway 2 at Rhonda Blvd to Waverly Rd 2029 75,739 4227 - Scottsdale Dr Scottsdale Dr at Swindells St to Annisson Ct 2029 79,623 4230 - Concession St Concession St at Wellington St to Prospect St 2029 50,881 4307 - Division St Division St at Queen St to King St W 2029 47,774 4321 - Elgin St Elgin St at Concession St to Bridge 2029 45,443 4367 - Prince St Prince St at Liberty St to Simpson Av 2029 163,519 4371 - St George St St George St at King St to Church St 2029 45,443 4376 - Mearns Av Mearns Av at Orchard Park Dr to Soper Creek Dr 2029 147,594 Page 285 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 127 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4378 - Mearns Av Mearns Av at Flaxman Av to Apple Blossom Blvd 2029 120,406 4413 - Apple Blossom Blvd Apple Blossom Blvd at Mann St to Mearns Av 2029 157,692 4437 - Green Rd Green Rd at Hwy 2 to Prince William Dr 2029 132,058 4454 - Scugog St Scugog St at Longworth Ave to West Scugog Lane 2029 132,058 4455 - Scugog St Scugog St at Goodwin Ave to Bons Ave 2029 135,942 4504 - Uptown Av Uptown Av at Clarington Blvd to East End (Garnet Rickard Complex) 2029 43,890 4510 - Longworth Av Longworth Av at Regional Rd 57 to 265m E of Regional Rd 57 2029 134,597 4513 - Longworth Av Longworth Av at 263m E of Regional Rd 57 to 363m E of Regional Rd 57 2029 53,331 4517 - Longworth Av Longworth Av at Scugog St to Daley Dr 2029 108,753 4527 - Bottrell St Bottrell St at West Side Dr to Millburn Dr 2029 66,806 4537 - Sprucewood Cr Sprucewood Cr at Mearns Av to Guildwood Dr 2029 106,035 4556 - High St High St at Hogan Cr to Longworth Av 2029 73,797 4739 - Conc Rd 6 Conc Rd 6 at Highway 35 to Old Kirby Rd 2029 284,313 4776 - Conc Rd 8 Conc Rd 8 at Allin Rd to 400m E of Allin Rd 2029 151,478 4927 - Nash Rd Nash Rd at Holt Rd to Maple Grove Rd 2029 321,599 4960 - Conc Rd 6 Conc Rd 6 at 867m E of Washington Rd to Solina Rd 2029 147,594 5027 - Conc Rd 7 Conc Rd 7 at Bethesda Rd to Acres Rd 2029 318,492 5483 - Concession St Concession St at Prospect St to Elgin St 2029 69,913 5666 - Nash Rd Nash Rd at Townline Rd to Varcoe Rd 2029 163,130 5668 - Centerfield Dr Centerfield Dr at Hwy #2 to Nash Rd 2029 143,710 5685 - Queen St Queen St at Temperance St to Queen Ave 2029 163,130 54524 - Brookhouse Dr Brookhouse Dr at King Ave E to Harmer Dr 2029 108,753 Page 286 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 128 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 54529 - Concession St Concession St at Elgin St to Center St 2029 104,869 54530 - Concession St Concession St at Center St to Liberty St 2029 93,217 54535 - Edward St Edward St at Harmer Dr to Brookhouse Dr 2029 104,869 54554 - Longworth Ave Longworth Ave at Argent St to Liberty St 2029 69,913 54557 - Mearns Ave Mearns Ave at Apple Blossom Blvd to Sprucewood Cr 2029 174,782 54561 - Nash Rd Nash Rd at Centerfield Dr to Tooley Rd 2029 89,333 54562 - Nash Rd Nash Rd at Fourth Ave to Courtice Rd 2029 186,434 54563 - Nash Rd Nash Rd at George Reynolds Dr to Trulls Rd 2029 217,507 54577 - Scugog St Scugog St at West Scugog Lane to Goodwin Ave 2029 77,681 54903 - Queen St Queen St at King St to Temperance St 2029 114,191 55089 - Darlington Blvd Darlington Blvd at Highway 2 to 120m S of Highway 2 2029 46,609 59252 - Nash Rd Nash Rd at Varcoe Rd to Centerfield Dr 2029 155,362 4090 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Simpson Ave to Mearns Crt 2029 236,927 4097 - Concession St E Concession St E at Lambs Rd to Providence Rd 2029 322,376 4120 - Waverley Rd Waverley Rd at Martin Rd to Spry Ave 2029 40,006 4197 - Queen St Queen St at Lambert St S to St George St 2029 43,501 4237 - Concession St Concession St at Soper Creek Dr to Lambs Rd 2029 188,376 4502 - Clarington Blvd Clarington Blvd at Stevens Rd to North End Temporary Cul-de-Sac 2029 84,284 4618 - Old Scugog Rd Old Scugog Rd at Edmonson Av to North Limit of Hampton 2029 197,310 4644 - Millstream Ln Millstream Ln at Mill Dam to Old Scugog Rd 2029 77,681 4690 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at Highway 35 to Arthur St 2029 381,025 4921 - Concession St E Concession St E at Bragg Rd to Darlington Clarke Townline 2029 320,046 Page 287 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 129 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4922 - Nash Rd Nash Rd at Hancock Rd to Solina Rd 2029 320,046 4955 - Conc Rd 6 Conc Rd 6 at West Townline Rd to 0.1km W of Langmaid Rd 2029 427,246 5039 - Conc Rd 8 Conc Rd 8 at Regional Rd 57 to Lettner Rd Road Allowance 2029 302,956 5090 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at Pebblestone Rd to 900m N of Pebblestone Rd 2029 350,341 5103 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at Highway 2 to Nash Rd 2029 311,501 5104 - Solina Rd Solina Rd at Nash Rd to 600m N of Nash Rd 2029 233,043 54531 - Concession St Concession St at Appleblossom to Mann St 2029 85,449 54573 - Rudel Rd Rudel Rd at Edward St to Hwy#2 2029 112,637 53068 - Longworth Ave Longworth Ave at Liberty St TO Brooking St 2029 178,666 5162 - Old Scugog Rd Old Scugog Rd at Salter Ct to 500m N of Salter Ct 2029 53,779 3710 - Nash Rd Nash Rd at Harry Gay Dr to Hancock Rd 2029 119,240 4095 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Bowmanville East Limits (Haines St) to Lambs Rd 2029 161,188 4688 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at Pollard Rd to Lockhart Rd 2029 321,599 4920 - Concession St E Concession St E at Providence Rd to Bragg Rd 2029 318,881 5091 - Trulls Rd Trulls Rd at 900m N of Pebblestone Rd to Taunton Rd 2029 444,724 5124 - Holt Rd Holt Rd at Highway 2 to Nash Rd 2029 577,558 54579 - Simpson Ave Simpson Ave at Hobb Dr to King St 2029 58,261 3923 - Southfield Ave. Southfield Ave. at Fenning Dr to Rosswell Dr 2030 144,603 4074 - Lake Rd Lake Rd at Port Darlington Rd to East End Cul- de-Sac 2030 328,428 4086 - Baseline Rd Baseline Rd at Hunt St to Duke St 2030 45,164 4235 - Concession St Concession St at Mann St to Kershaw St 2030 83,196 4347 - Simpson Av Simpson Av at 230m N of Baseline Rd to 427m N of Baseline Rd 2030 76,858 Page 288 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 130 Asset Asset Description Event Date Event Cost 4501 - Clarington Blvd Clarington Blvd at Uptown Av to Stevens Rd 2030 54,672 54526 - Conc Rd 3 Conc Rd 3 at 100m E of West Scugog Ln to West Scugog Ln 2030 118,852 54536 - Fenning Dr Fenning Dr at Southfield Ave to 47m S of Cornish Dr 2030 75,273 3708 - Nash Rd Nash Rd at Courtice Rd to Harry Gay Dr 2030 202,048 Page 289 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 131 Appendix 3: Bridges and Culverts 10-year Replacement Forecast Asset ID Asset Description Asset Type Event Date Event Cost 97 099534-LOT 12/13, CONC VII, DARLINGTON Bridge 2021 $ 379,000 477 093504-NORTH STREET Culvert 2021 422,000 485 095501-SOMERVILLE DRIVE, ORONO Culvert 2021 200,000 515 098509-LOT 7, CONC B/I, CLARKE Culvert 2021 193,000 516 098510-LOT 4, CONC B/I, CLARKE Culvert 2021 222,000 524 098518-LOT 29, CONC III/IV, CLARKE Culvert 2021 150,000 525 098519-LOT 29, CONC III/IV, CLARKE Culvert 2021 513,000 479 094010-MARTIN ROAD PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS Culvert 2021 500,000 480 094501-PORT DARLINGTON ROAD Culvert 2022 292,000 519 098513-LOT 1, CONC I, CLARKE Culvert 2022 258,000 578 099125-LOT 35, CONC VIII, DARLINGTON Culvert 2022 723,000 600 099525-LOT 2, CONC V/VI, DARLINGTON Culvert 2022 489,000 74 099077-LOT 26/27, CONC II, DARLINGTON Bridge 2023 883,000 538 098533-LOT 25, CONC VI/VII, CLARKE Culvert 2023 302,000 540 098535-LOT 28/29, CONC VII, CLARKE Culvert 2023 436,000 579 099129-LOT 28, CONC VIII, DARLINGTON Culvert 2024 599,000 610 099536-LOT 1, CONC VII/VIII, DARLINGTON Culvert 2024 400,000 520 098514-LOT 16/17, CONC II, CLARKE Culvert 2025 327,000 535 098529-LOT 19, CONC V/VI, CLARKE Culvert 2025 346,000 593 099514-LOT 8/9, CONC III, DARLINGTON Culvert 2026 316,000 36 098047-LOT 4/5, CONC VI, CLARKE Bridge 2027 1,280,000 512 098506-LOT 6/7, CONC B, CLARKE Culvert 2027 280,000 492 095508-MILL STREET Culvert 2028 271,000 570 099065-LOT 17, CONC BF/I, DARLINGTON Culvert 2028 908,000 576 099111-LOT 20, CONC VII, DARLINGTON Culvert 2028 421,000 594 099515-LOT 34, CONC III/IV, DARLINGTON Culvert 2028 338,000 597 099520-LOT 22/23, CONC V, DARLINGTON Culvert 2028 262,000 493 095509-ROBINS ROAD Culvert 2029 301,000 530 098524-LOT 24/25, CONC V, CLARKE Culvert 2029 289,000 35 099045-LOT 20/21, CONC VII, DARLINGTON Bridge 2030 339,000 554 098548-LOT 28/29, CONC VIII, CLARKE Culvert 2030 297,000 582 099503-LOT 18/19, CONC BF, DARLINGTON Culvert 2030 182,000 Page 290 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 132 Asset ID Asset Description Asset Type Event Date Event Cost 588 099509-LOT 20, CONC I/II, DARLINGTON Culvert 2030 280,000 471 091501-HILL STREET, NEWTONVILLE Culvert 2031 378,000 500 098055-LOT 8/9, CONC B, CLARKE Culvert 2031 574,000 558 098552 - Lot 32 Concession 7/8 Clarke Culvert 2031 393,000 589 099510-LOT 19, CONC I/II, DARLINGTON Culvert 2031 317,000 612 099538-LOT 10/11, CONC VIII, DARLINGTON Culvert 2031 282,000 613 099539-LOT 10/11, CONC VIII, DARLINGTON Culvert 2031 301,000 Page 291 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 133 Appendix 4: Lifecycle Events per Storm Water Asset - Conduit Storm Sewer - Conduit (Concrete) Lifecycle Event Cost/M "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx . Lifecyc le Year Inspection - CCTV & Pipe Flushing $ 8.70 40 - 60 No Impact 40 Inspection - CCTV & Pipe Flushing $ 8.70 0-20 No Impact 70 Asset Replacement $1,078 0 Increase Condition to 100% 75 ** Conduit replacement costs varies significantly based on diameter and depth of the pipe. An average pricing was used based on the various sizes of concrete conduit in Clarington's inventory. Storm Sewer - Conduit (PVC) Lifecycle Event Cost/M "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx . Lifecyc le Year Inspection - CCTV & Pipe Flushing $8.70 40 - 60 No Impact 40 Inspection - CCTV & Pipe Flushing $8.70 0-20 No Impact 70 Asset Replacement $349 0 Increase Condition to 100% 75 ** Conduit replacement costs varies significantly based on diameter and depth of the pipe. An average pricing was used based on the various sizes of CSP conduit in Clarington's inventory. Storm Sewer - Conduit (VCP) Lifecycle Event Cost/M "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx . Lifecyc le Year Inspection - CCTV & Pipe Flushing $ 8.70 20-40 No Impact 30 Asset Replacement $1,078 0 Increase Condition to 100% 75 Page 292 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 134 Appendix 5: Lifecycle Events per Storm Water Asset – Structures Storm Sewer - Catch Basin Structures (Single Grate) Lifecycle Event Cost/Unit "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx. Lifecycle Year Street Sweeping - Spring $ 54.06 - Maintains Condition Annually Street Sweeping - Fall $ 54.06 - Maintains Condition Annually Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 3 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 6 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 9 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 12 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 15 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 18 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 21 Resetting Initial $ 2,322.00 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 23 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 24 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 27 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 30 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 33 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 36 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 39 Inspection - CCTV $ 37.00 40 - 60 No Impact 40 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 43 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 46 Resetting 2 $ 2,322.00 20 - 40 Increases Condition to 60 - 80% 46 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 49 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 52 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 55 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 58 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 0-20 Maintains Condition 61 Resetting 3 $ 2,322.00 0-20 Increases Condition to 40 - 60% 63 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 0-20 Maintains Condition 66 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 0-20 Maintains Condition 69 Inspection - CCTV $ 37.00 0-20 No Impact 70 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 87.97 0-20 Maintains Condition 72 Asset Replacement $1,933 0 Increase Condition to 100% 75 Page 293 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 135 Storm Sewer - Catch Basin Structures (Double Grate) Lifecycle Event Cost/Unit "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx. Lifecycle Year Street Sweeping - Spring $ 54.06 - Maintains Condition Annually Street Sweeping - Fall $ 54.06 - Maintains Condition Annually Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 3 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 6 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 9 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 12 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 15 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 18 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 21 Resetting Initial $ 2,322.00 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 23 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 24 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 27 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 30 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 33 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 36 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 39 Inspection - CCTV $ 37.00 40 - 60 No Impact 40 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 43 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 46 Resetting 2 $ 2,322.00 20 - 40 Increases Condition to 60 - 80% 46 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 49 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 52 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 55 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 58 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 0-20 Maintains Condition 61 Resetting 3 $ 2,322.00 0-20 Increases Condition to 40 - 60% 63 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 0-20 Maintains Condition 66 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 0-20 Maintains Condition 69 Inspection - CCTV $ 37.00 0-20 No Impact 70 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 175.94 0-20 Maintains Condition 72 Asset Replacement $3,460.00 0 Increase Condition to 100% 75 Page 294 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 136 Storm Sewer - Catch Basin Structures (Triple Grate) Lifecycle Event Cost/Unit "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx. Lifecycle Year Street Sweeping - Spring $ 54.06 - Maintains Condition Annually Street Sweeping - Fall $ 54.06 - Maintains Condition Annually Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 3 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 6 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 9 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 12 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 80 - 100 Maintains Condition 15 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 18 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 21 Resetting Initial $ 2,322.00 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 23 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 24 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 27 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 30 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 33 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 36 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 39 Inspection - CCTV $ 37.00 40 - 60 No Impact 40 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 40 - 60 Maintains Condition 43 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 46 Resetting 2 $ 2,322.00 20 - 40 Increases Condition to 60 - 80% 46 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 49 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 52 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 55 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 20 - 40 Maintains Condition 58 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 0-20 Maintains Condition 61 Resetting 3 $ 2,322.00 0-20 Increases Condition to 40 - 60% 63 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 0-20 Maintains Condition 66 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 0-20 Maintains Condition 69 Inspection - CCTV $ 37.00 0-20 No Impact 70 Catch Basin Cleaning & Disposal Services $ 263.91 0-20 Maintains Condition 72 Asset Replacement $4,987.00 0 Increase Condition to 100% 75 Page 295 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 137 Storm Sewer – Maintenance Holes Lifecycle Event Cost/Unit "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx. Lifecycle Year Resetting Initial $ 1,670.00 60 - 80 Maintains Condition 23 Inspection - CCTV $ 37.00 40 - 60 No Impact 40 Resetting 2 $ 1,670.00 20 - 40 Increases Condition to 60 - 80% 46 Resetting 3 $ 1,670.00 20 - 40 Increases Condition to 40 - 60% 63 Inspection - CCTV $ 37.00 0-20 No Impact 70 Asset Replacement $ 8,814 0 Increase Condition to 100% 75 Page 296 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 138 Appendix 6: Lifecycle Events per Storm Water Asset – Ponds Storm Water Ponds – Wet Lifecycle Event Cost/Unit "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx. Lifecycle Year Inspection $ - - No Impact Annually Minor Maintenance $ - - Maintains Condition Annually Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 5 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 5 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 10 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 10 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 15 Sediment Cleanout / Structure rehab $ 286,000.00 20-40 Increases Condition to 80-100% 15 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 20 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 20 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 25 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 25 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 30 Sediment Cleanout / Structure rehab $ 286,000.00 20-40 Increases Condition to 80-100% 30 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 35 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 35 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 40 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 40 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 45 Sediment Cleanout / Structure rehab $ 286,000.00 20-40 Increases Condition to 80-100% 45 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 50 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 50 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 55 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 55 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 60 Sediment Cleanout / Structure rehab $ 286,000.00 20-40 Increases Condition to 80-100% 60 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 65 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 65 Major Maintenance $ - 40-60 Maintains Condition 70 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 70 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 20-40 No Impact 70 Full Reconstruction (Average for 23 Facilities at 70% Replacement) $ 245,160.00 20-40 Increases Condition to 100% 75 Page 297 Asset Management Plan 2022 | 139 Storm Water Ponds –Dry Lifecycle Event Cost/Unit "Physical Condition" Rating Effect Approx. Lifecycle Year Inspection $ - - No Impact Annually Minor Maintenance $ - - Maintains Condition Annually Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 5 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 5 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 10 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 10 Major Maintenance $ - 40-60 Maintains Condition 15 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 15 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 20-40 No Impact 20 Sediment Cleanout / Structure rehab $ 214,500.00 20-40 Increases Condition to 80-100% 20 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 25 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 25 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 30 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 30 Major Maintenance $ - 40-60 Maintains Condition 35 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 35 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 20-40 No Impact 40 Sediment Cleanout / Structure rehab $ 214,500.00 20-40 Increases Condition to 80-100% 40 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 45 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 45 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 50 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 50 Major Maintenance $ - 40-60 Maintains Condition 55 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 55 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 20-40 No Impact 60 Sediment Cleanout / Structure rehab $ 214,500.00 20-40 Increases Condition to 80-100% 60 Major Maintenance $ - 60-80 Maintains Condition 65 Sediment Survey $ 3,833.00 60-80 No Impact 65 Major Maintenance $ - 40-60 Maintains Condition 70 Sediment Survey $3,833.00 40-60 No Impact 70 Full Reconstruction (Average for 15 Facilities at 70% Replacement) $ 204,955.00 20-40 Increases Condition to 100% 75 Page 298 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report December 2021 Page 299 © 2021, Municipality of Clarington. All rights Reserved. The preparation of this project was carried out with assistance from the Government of Canada and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. | Notwithstanding this support, the views expressed are the personal views of the authors, and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Government of Canada accept no responsibility for them. Page 300 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction/Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Compilation and Review of Available Data ......................................................................................... 2 2.2 Limitations of Available Data .............................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Criteria Used in the Analyses .............................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Data Needs for Modelling ................................................................................................................... 5 2.5 Filling Data Gaps and QA/QC Efforts ................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Data Layers Produced ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.7 Development of Models ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.8 Creation of 5-year Storm File .............................................................................................................. 9 3.0 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 10 4.0 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................ 13 5.0 References ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Appendices A – H - Stormsewer System Mapbooks by Community Table of Figures Figure 1 - Portions of study area in which subcatchment data was available. ............................................. 2 Figure 2 - Distribution of Pre-1985 Storm Sewer systems within the study area......................................... 4 Figure 3 - Mostert station IDF data imported into PCSWMM for creation of 5-year Storm ........................ 9 Figure 4 - Sample results for sewer network in Bowmanville (B04) ........................................................... 10 List of Tables Table 1 - Table 3 from O.Reg. 588/17 ........................................................................................................... 1 Table 2 - Number of systems to be modelled by Community ...................................................................... 4 Table 3 - Impervious area as a percentage of land use ................................................................................ 6 Table 4 - Estimates of Manning’s roughness coefficient for overland flow ................................................. 7 Table 5 - Runoff curve numbers for selected land uses (for antecedent moisture condition II).................. 8 Table 6 - Average moisture limits and saturated hydraulic conductivity for different soil types ................ 9 Table 7 - Summary of sewer system resiliency to the 5-year storm by urban area/hamlet ...................... 11 Page 301 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 1 1.0 Introduction/Background The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority has partnered with the Municipality of Clarington to undertake an assessment to confirm the percentage of the municipality’s storm sewer system resilient to a 5 year storm. This analysis was needed to fulfill the requirements of the Province’s regulation regarding Asset Management Planning for Municipal Infrastructure (O. Reg. 588/17). Table 3 from the Regulation is shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 - Table 3 from O.Reg. 588/17 Page 302 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 2 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Compilation and Review of Available Data The initial stage of the project involved discussions with Clarington staff to ascertain the data that were available for the purposes of the study. The municipality had retained AECOM (formerly Totten Sims Hubicki) to undertake an inventory of their storm sewer system and represent this information in a Geographic Information System (GIS). This information proved to be essential to completing the analysis. The information provided by Clarington staff included the following: GIS shapefiles for storm sewer outlets, junctions (structures), catch basins (CBs) and conduits (pipes) GIS shapefiles depicting the limit of registered plans of subdivisions within the municipality GIS shapefiles indicating the location of stormwater management (SWM) ponds and their associated drainage areas GIS shapefiles of storm sewer outlet, junctions, CBs and conduits for infrastructure owned by the Region of Durham GIS shapefiles of subcatchment areas draining to stormwater infrastructure (i.e. CBs and maintenance hatches (MHs)) for a portion of the study area As noted above, the drainage areas/subcatchments associated with the storm sewer systems was incomplete, providing coverage for roughly twenty percent of the study area. Available subcatchment areas are depicted in Figure 1 below. Figure 1 - Portions of study area in which subcatchment data was available. Page 303 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 3 It should be noted that sewer design sheets and supporting SWM reports for developments were not available from the municipality for this work. Once the data was received from the municipality, the data was reviewed for completeness and errors, and was compiled into 171 independent storm sewer networks for the study area. 2.2 Limitations of Available Data While the data provide by the municipality was very helpful, there were limitations to the data that posed some challenges in completing the analyses. They included: Subcatchment information was only available for approximately twenty percent of the storm sewer systems. Some sewer systems had incomplete or partial coverage of subcatchment area information. Some sewer system components were missing data for various attribute fields i.e. elevation data for selected outlets, junctions and conduits. Subcatchment attribute data included area and runoff coefficients but did not include any slope, length or width information. These had to be measured or estimated by the study team using GIS or the modelling software. The provided subcatchments were generally reliable however some errors in subcatchment boundaries were noted and were corrected/revised where possible. The vertical datums associated with the data were not referenced but were assumed to be in CGVD1928. The limitations of the data created the need for a significant level of additional effort to prepare the data for use in the modelling software. 2.3 Criteria Used in the Analyses The criteria to be used in the analyses were discussed with Clarington staff and it was agreed to include the use of the 5-year storm Yarnell intensity duration frequency (IDF) curve. While not formally noted in the municipal standards, it has been confirmed that this standard has been applied in Clarington for sizing of minor system/storm sewers since at least 1985 (pers. Comm. Benson-Lisinski/Mavin). It is likely that the standard was applied from the establishment of Regional Government in 1974 but it was agreed that 1985 is a conservative estimate for the purposes of the study. As such, the assumption was made that any storm sewer systems built since 1985 were assumed to have adequate capacity given that the 5-year standard was used in sizing these storm sewer systems. Through the application of this criteria, detailed modelling would be focused on those systems that were constructed prior to 1985. This reduced the number of sewer systems to model from 171 to 33. The distributions of those systems within the communities within the Municipality of Clarington are summarized in Table 2 below. Page 304 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 4 Table 2 - Number of systems to be modelled by Community Community Number of Storm Sewer Systems Modelled Bowmanville 19 Courtice 3 Hampton 4 Newcastle 1 Orono 6 The distribution of Pre-1985 Storm Sewer systems within the study area are depicted red within Figure 2 below. Figure 2 - Distribution of Pre-1985 Storm Sewer systems within the study area Page 305 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 5 2.4 Data Needs for Modelling The software package selected for use in the analyses was PCSWMM. PCSWMM is advanced modelling software based on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Storm Water Management Model version 5 (SWMM 5). The key data requirements for the software are indicated below: An accurate and complete subcatchment layer A digital elevation model (DEM) which is needed for use of the watershed/subcatchment delineation tool A complete storm sewer network with all relevant attributes Pipe/conduit sizes in meters (not millimeters) Consistent naming conventions to ensure proper importation of network into model to match fields and link nodes to conduits Subcatchment parameters (area, flow length, width, slope, soil information, etc.) Environment Canada data used to develop Clarington rainfall data from rainfall gauge 2.5 Filling Data Gaps and QA/QC Efforts The study team put forth extensive efforts to fill data gaps and ensure the data could be used in the modelling software. This included the following efforts: Created networks from shapefiles for 171 storm sewer systems Cleaned up attribute information where errors and gaps existed with a focus on the 33 systems to be modelled Converted pipe/conduit sizes (diameters) from millimeters to meters Converted subcatchment area values from meters squared to hectares Corrected naming errors/inconsistencies Interpolated and/or estimated elevations where data was missing (using PCSWMM) Matched fields to link model elements Summarized storm sewer systems by age 2.6 Data Layers Produced The study team produced a number of data products for use in the analyses. These included the following: Soil layer for the study area from the Ontario Geological Survey (OGS) Processing of light detecting and ranging (LiDAR) data to create a digital elevation model (DEM) for each urban area within the study area Use of the DEM to produce a flow trends layer to assist in subcatchment delineation efforts Separation of relevant sewer system shapefiles into individual networks by age to establish the pre and post 1985 storm sewer systems for each of the 171 outlets, including the 33 networks to be modelled in PCSWMM 2.7 Development of Models Once data gaps were filled and QA/QC completed, models were created for each of the 33 pre-1985 storm sewer systems The DEM and sewer networks were imported in PCSWMM and the watershed delineation tool (WDT) was used to create subcatchments for areas where they were not provided/did not exist. Subcatchments were reviewed in conjunction with the flow trends layer, and were Page 306 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 6 lumped/joined/split and adjusted where required using the editing tools within PCSWMM. Subcatchments were combined where older and newer systems were joined or linked. Sewer networks were highlighted in the map screen and reviewed in profile view for appropriate elevations, slopes and connectivity. In instances where rim elevations were not available the DEM elevations at the manhole location were used as a surrogate value. Where manhole depths were not available, an estimate was made based on the invert elevations of adjacent pipes. A general assumption of two metres was considered a reasonable proxy. Subcatchment outlets were reviewed to confirm that they were draining to the correct manhole outlet. Subcatchment widths and flow lengths were reviewed and edited where necessary. Subcatchment slopes were also reviewed if available. In the absence of any data, an average slope value of 2% was assumed. Subcatchment impervious levels were reviewed and edited to generally reflect the given land use. Percent impervious values were taken from Table 3-1 from SWMM manual (see reproduced image in Table 3 below). Table 3 - Impervious area as a percentage of land use Page 307 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 7 Manning’s n values were reviewed and adjusted for impervious and pervious areas. Values were assigned based on data within Table 3-5 of SWMM manual, presented in Table 4 below: Table 4 - Estimates of Manning’s roughness coefficient for overland flow The SCS ‘Curve Number’ was selected as the ‘infiltration method’ to be used in the model. Appropriate curve numbers were selected based on soils and land use within subcatchment as per Table 5 (from Table 4-9 of SWMM manual). Page 308 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 8 Table 5 - Runoff curve numbers for selected land uses (for antecedent moisture condition II) Hydraulic conductivity values were reviewed and edited to reflect saturated hydraulic conductivity values for the relevant soil groups based on Table 5-3 of the SWMM manual (reproduced in Table 6 below). Page 309 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 9 Table 6 - Average moisture limits and saturated hydraulic conductivity for different soil types 2.8 Creation of 5-year Storm File Rainfall data from Environment Canada’s Atmospheric Environment Service (AES) rain gauge at the Bowmanville Mostert station was used to develop a 5-year rain event for use in the model (see Figure 3 below). As per Clarington standards, the Yarnell distribution was used and a 6 hour storm distribution was selected. Figure 3 - Mostert station IDF data imported into PCSWMM for creation of 5-year Storm Page 310 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 10 3.0 Results Models were created and analyzed for all 33 storm sewer systems which were constructed (or had components constructed) prior to 1985. The rendering tool was used in the software to colour-code system components based on performance. Pipe capacity results are displayed as follows: 0 – 80% capacity is displayed as green 80 – 100% capacity is displayed as yellow 100%+ is displayed as red The results of the analyses are depicted in the maps within the project map book in Appendices A through H. A graphical sample of the results for Bowmanville Network 4 (B04) is shown in Figure 4 below. Figure 4 - Sample results for sewer network in Bowmanville (B04) Page 311 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 11 Tabular results for all modelled sewer systems by urban area are summarized in Table 7. Table 7 - Summary of sewer system resiliency to the 5-year storm by urban area/hamlet Storm Sewer System <80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity >100% Capacity Total Conduits Bowmanville B01 25 1 8 34 B02 54 1 0 55 B03 99 3 2 104 B04 23 6 6 35 B07 12 0 0 12 B09 11 0 2 13 B13 26 7 2 35 B14 28 13 20 61 B16 5 1 3 9 B17 45 2 2 49 B20 45 6 11 62 B21 39 2 8 49 B25 16 2 1 19 B30 26 0 0 26 B31 24 7 3 34 B32 29 2 3 34 B34 66 14 6 86 B53 69 3 4 76 Assumed after 1985 1602 0 0 1602 Totals: 2244 70 81 2395 Burketon Assumed after 1985 1 0 0 1 Totals: 1 0 0 1 Courtice C03 9 1 0 10 C07 4 0 0 4 C20 16 1 1 18 Assumed after 1985 1457 0 0 1457 Totals: 1486 2 1 1489 Hampton H02 3 0 1 4 Page 312 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 12 H05 3 2 1 6 H06 8 1 2 11 Assumed after 1985 15 0 0 15 Totals: 29 3 4 36 Newcastle N10 34 0 1 35 Assumed after 1985 558 0 0 558 Totals: 592 0 1 593 Newtonville Assumed after 1985 13 0 0 13 Totals: 13 0 0 13 Orono O01 2 0 0 2 O02 10 0 0 10 O03 12 0 0 12 O04 2 0 0 2 O05 5 0 1 6 O06 14 1 2 17 Assumed after 1985 59 0 0 59 Totals: 104 1 3 108 Tyrone Assumed after 1985 6 0 0 6 Totals: 6 0 0 6 System-Wide Totals <80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity >100% Capacity Total Conduits No. of Conduits 4475 76 90 4641 Percentages 96.42 1.64 1.94 100 As noted in the Table 7 above, the percentage of the municipal stormwater management system resilient to a 5-year storm is 98.06%. Page 313 Clarington | Storm Sewer Risk Assessment Report | December 2021| Page | 13 4.0 Recommendations As within any asset management program, ongoing data development and improvement are needed. Similarly, supporting models require regular updating and maintenance to remain reflective of the asset system. As such, the study team has summarized a number of recommendations for consideration by the Municipality of Clarington. Subcatchment information should continue to be developed into a GIS format (and refined as necessary) for all of the stormwater infrastructure within the municipality to assist in future analyses. Continued efforts should be made to fill data gaps and correct errors in outlet, junction and conduit data within the sewer network through additional survey efforts to ensure accuracy. While the assumption that any storm systems built since 1985 have adequate capacity is reasonable (given that the 5-year standard was used in sizing these storm sewer systems), it is recommended that these systems be analyzed in future models to confirm this assumption once a complete subcatchment layer is available in GIS for all storm sewer systems within the municipality. It is recommended that boundary conditions for all outlets be confirmed with riverine hydraulic models (where applicable) and updated as models are improved/updated. The Yarnell 5-year storm IDF curve was used as the rainfall input in the PCSWMM models. It is recommended that additional analyses be carried out to test storms of varying durations to confirm the sensitivity of the storm systems and further identify portions of the system that may require further investigation or future improvements. Further analysis of sewer system performance is recommended for connected systems that share junctions and conduits to fully understand the hydraulic interactions between systems under various events and flow conditions, i.e. B34 and B40, B53 and B70, etc. Further analysis of Network 34 in Bowmanville (B34) is recommended to understand the interactions with Networks B12 and B25 along the CPR corridor between Scugog Street and Liberty Street. The B34 model should be expanded to include system outlets and inlets in addition to storage and conveyance functions of the CPR drainage system. Consideration should be given to transitioning data resources to the new Canadian standard vertical datums (CGVD2013) to align with LiDAR standards. This will allow for many additional future modelling benefits, such as developing coupled networks to show hydraulic interactions between 1D conduit flow and 2D surface flow. This approach will be particularly beneficial in assessing future climate change impacts. Page 314 Page 315 APPENDIX A – MAP BOOK FOR BOWMANVILLE Page 316 BOWMANVILLE AVENUE W ILLIAM F AIR DRI VE CROMBIE STREETKENNETH COLE DR IVE FRED JACKMAN AV E NUE BR UCE CA M E R O N DRIVE B RUCE C AME R O N DRIVE HENRY S MI T H AVEN UE ALBERT CHRISTIE STREETB85-105AB85-1 11 B85-105 B8 5-11 9 B85-115B85-113B85-121B85-1 17 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 4 MAP 5 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 1 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 317 BR UC E CAMERON DR IVE FRED JACKMAN AVENUE CROMBI E S T R E E T BILL COLE C O U R T WILLIAM FAIR DRIVEALBERT CHRISTIE STREETMOSES C R ESCENTARTHUR MCLAUGHLIN STREETMIDDL E ROADB69-263B85-113 B69-265B69-267B69-269MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 2 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 318 HIGH AM PLACEM O SE S C R E S C E NTMIDDLE ROADSYDE L C O U RT HARRY LEE CRESCENT B69-263B69-269B69-265B69-267 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 3 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 319 EDWIN CARRSTREETN ORTHGL EN BOULEV ARD WILLIAM FAIR DRI V E CROMBIE STREETOLD SCUGOG ROADG AUD G A T E KENNETHCOLE DR I VEJOHN MATTHEWCRESCENTFRED JAC K M A N A V E N U E OLD SCUGOG COURTCA REY L ANEBOWMANVILLE AVENUESIDNE Y RUND L E A VENUE RO BB LAN EJACK ROACHSTREETR ICH A RD DA VI ES CRE S C ENT RAY R ICHARD S STREETB8 5 - 085 B85-101B85- 0 3 1B85-121 B85- 0 2 5 B85-00 5 B8 5- 0 4 7 B 8 5 -001 B 85-097 B 8 5-0 3 7 B8 5-017B85-093B85-111 B8 5-0 73 B85-045B85 -079 B85-065B85-091B85-039B85-043B85-041B85-0 99 B85-119 B85-033B85-0 27 B85-113 B85-081 B8 5-083 B85-069 B85-055B85-059B85-067B85-057B85-115B85-105 B85-05 1B85-075B85-013 B85-089 A B85-053 B 85-091A B 8 5-057 AB85-109B85-095B8 5-029B85-105AB85-063 B85-003 B85 -015 B 85-0 7 1B85-089B85-021B85-087B85-117 B85-103 B85-077 B85-061B85-107B85 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 12 MAP 13 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 4 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 320 FRED JACKMAN AVENU E JEROME WAYRONALD HO OPER A V E NUECROMBIE STREETLOA NA LAN E NOR T HG LEN B OULEVA R D EDWIN CARR STREETROBB L A NE TAIT CRESCENTTAIT CRESCENT SID NE Y RU NDLE AV ENUE CA REY L ANE MID DLEROADK E N NETH C O L E D RIVE MOSES C R E S C E N T B85-059 B85-00 7B85-035 B85 -02 5 B8 5-029 B85-049 B85-001B85-041 B85-113 B85-071 B 8 5-0 3 7 B8 5-073 B85-045B69-263B85-065 B 8 5 -063B85-039B69-265B69-261B85 -0 27 B85-013B85-017AB85-003 B85-015 B85-0 17 B 8 5 -005 B85-009B85-019B85-021MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 5 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 321 TAIT CRESCE N T N ORTHG L E N B O U LE VAR DJEROME WAYLOA NA LAN E CONCE S S I O N R O A D 3HIGHAM PLACEDOUGLAS KEMP CRESCENTCONCESSI ON R OAD 3 R ONALD H O O P E R AVEN U E MIDD LEROADJOHN STALKER DRIVE MOSES C R E S C E N T THOMAS B I RD STREETMIDD LEROADBILL H UTCHIN SON C RES CENT DO U G LAS K E MP C RESCE N T HARRY LEE C R E S C E N T B 6 9 - 2 3 7 B69-095B69-23 1 B69-239B69-229B69-099B69-263B69-253 B69-2 41B69-265B69-261B69-257B69-259B69-251 B69-245 B69-24 3 B69-23 3B69-255B69-249 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 6 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 322 LIBERTYSTREETNORTH GI MBLETTSTREETJO H N TAYL O R DRIV E BI LL HUTCHINSON CRESCENT RO NALD H O O PER AV E N U E C ONCES SI O N R O A D 3 COURTNE Y ST R E ETDAVID BAKER COURTDOUGLAS KEMP CRESCENTNORTHGLEN BOULEVARDHARRY LEE CRESCENTMCCORKELLSTREETTHOMAS B IRD STREET KEE LE R C RES C E N T REBECCA CO U R T B70-303B70 - 297 B70-161B7 0-18 7 B70-209 B70-2 87 B70-289B70-159B70-217B70-163B70-2 8 5 B70 -2 91 B 70-211 B 7 0-2 15 B 70-305B70-295B6 9-243 B70-185B70-279B 7 0 -207 B70-197B70-203B70-199B70-205B70-281B70-293B70-213 B70 -201 B 6 9-245 B 69-24 7 MAP 3 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 7 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 323 FENWIC K AVEN U ELIBERTY STREET NORTHCOURT N E Y ST REET ALLISON STREET C O N C ES SIO N ROAD 3 MCCORKELLSTREETKEELERCRESCENTCOPELAND GATEHANNI NGCOURTEL FO R D D R IV E REBEC C A C O U R T FREE LAN D AVENU E POMEROYSTREETJEN N IN GS D RI V E B5 5-0 77B70-193B70-177B55 -24 5 B70-161B70-189B55-255B70-205 B55-097 B70-183B55-079B55-253B70-19 5 B70-2 07 B70-157B55-283B55-081B 5 5 - 0 8 7B55-251B55-095 B70-163 B55-28 1 B 7 0 -159 B 55-083B55-249B55-23 9B55-091B55 -2 57 B70-197B70-203B70-199B55-093B70-1 75 B70-1 8 7 B55-247B70-185B70-181B7 0-17 3 B70-179B70-191B70 -201 B55-0 85 B B55-24 1 B5 5 -243B55-085AMAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 8 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 324 E L FO R D DRI V E LADDCOURTLOBBCOURTB A T E S C O U R T CHAM PIN E SQ UARE FENWICK AVENUECOPELAND GATEFREELANDAVENUEJOLLOW DR IVE RICKAB YSTREETPOMEROYSTREETCONC E SSION R O A D 3 CH AMPI N E SQ UARE B5 5 - 0 6 1 B 5 5 -21 9 B55-065 B5 5-077 B55-267 B5 5 -207 B55-209 B55-283B5 5 - 2 2 1 B5 5-0 8 9 B 55-25 7 B55-081B 5 5 - 0 8 7 B55-231B55-075B 5 5 - 2 1 5B55-079B55-071 B5 5-2 1 7 B55-095 B55-235B55-243 B 5 5 -21 1 B5 5-2 81 B55-073B55-213 B55-0 6 9 B5 5 - 2 3 3 B55-063B55- 0 3 9 B 55-083 B55-043B5 5-111 B55-223B 55-2 0 5 B55-109B55-045B55-059B55-225AB55-101B55-091B55-057B55-271 B55 -273 B 55-269 B55-041B55-105B55-047B55-055B 5 5 - 0 9 9 B55-067B55-093B 5 5-107 B55 -051 B 5 5-239 B55-24 1 B55-053 B 55 -103 B 55-097 B 5 5 -049 B55-225BB55-229MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 9 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 325 CROUGHSTREETMA XWELL COURT F R EEL AN D AVENU E RICKABY STREETH OOP ER S QU A R E MEARNS AVENUEJOLLOWDRIVE HA NN A D RIVE CONCE S SI O N R O A D 3 CHAMPINE SQUAREHOOP E R SQUA RE B55 - 2 6 5 B5 5 -2 07 B55-021 B 5 5 -21 1 B55-209 B55-125 B 5 5 - 2 1 5 B5 5-2 1 7B55-223B55-213B55-017B55-037 B55- 039 B55-027 B 55-1 13 B55-271 B55-043B5 5-111 B55-033B59 -0 1 1 B55 -109 B55-225A B5 5-267 B 55-269 B55-035B55-041B55-263B59-013B59-015B55-227B55-117BB55-025B55-119B55-029 B 5 5-20 5 B59-017B55-031B55-023B 55-121 B55-0 49 B55-115 B55-019B5 5-123 B55-117A B55-225BB55-261 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 10 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 326 CROUGHSTREETHANNA DRI V E B59-007B59-009B5 9 -0 1 1 B59 -017 B59-013B59-015MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 18 MAP 19 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 11 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 327 NASH ROAD NO R T H S C U G O G C O U R T C ONCES SION ROAD 3OLD SCUGOG COURTBOWMANVI LLE AVENUEB85-005B85-055B85-001 B79-003 B85-013B 7 9-00 1 B85-053 B85-003 B79 -00 5 B79 B85 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 12 MAP 13 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 12 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 328 HO CKL EY AVE N UE BONS AVE NUE TAIT CRESCENT NORTH S CUG O G C OURT DA N SHE EH AN L A NE EDWIN CARRSTREETWES TOVER D R IVE PI PER CRESCENTBOWMANVILLE AVENUETAIT CRESCENTWEST SCUGOG LANE CON CE SS ION R OAD 3 G O O D A L L C R E S C E N T B69-15 7B69-179B69 -145B69-045B69-215B69-04 3 B69-161B69-219B 6 9 - 1 2 5 B85-001 B 6 9 -1 75 B 69-1 63 B69-135B69-185B6 9 -2 1 3 B69- 2 0 9 B69-197B69-189B69-041B 6 9-191 B69-19 9 B69-19 5B69-183B69-137 B 69-13 9 B6 9 -04 7 B 69-1 67 B69-193 B 6 9-21 7 B69-187 B 69-111B6 9 - 1 0 9 B69-181 B69-133B69-201B85-013 B6 9 - 0 3 5B69-169B6 9 -039 B 6 9 - 0 3 7 B85-005 B69-211B69-129B69-131B69-165B69-171B6 9 - 2 0 3 B 6 9-113 B6 9 -20 5 B6 9 - 2 0 7 B69-143 B69-155B69-151B85-011B69-159B69-173 B69 -17 1 E B69-149 B85-003 B 69-135EB85-009B69-141MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 20 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 13 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 329 CONCE S SI O N R O A D 3 M I D D L E R O A D NOR TH SCUG OG C OURT TAIT CRESCE N T COL VI L LE AVEN UE TAIT CR E S C E N T CONCES S I O N ROAD 3 H O CKLEY A V E N UE GOODALLCRESCENTBO NS AV ENUESCUGOGSTREETNICKSSTREET WYSE GATEC HIL D S COUR T KA U K O N E N CO U R T SCUGOG STREETGOOD A L L C R E S C E N T CO URTNEY S T REET WE S T SC UGO G L A NEPIPER CRESCENTLUNNEYCRESCENTB69 -127 B 6 9 - 2 3 7 B69-153B69-15 7 B 6 9-016B69-017B69-119B69-101B69 -051 B7 0 -267 B69-065B69-059B69-081B6 9 - 0 5 5 B6 9 - 2 3 1 B69-129 B69-0 53 B70-223B69-161 B 6 9 - 1 2 5 B69-061B69-063 B69-147 B69-239B69-075B69-117B69-041B 69-103B69-1 2 1 B69-0 73 B 6 9 -08 3 B69-0 6 9 B 6 9-163 B 69-1 67 B6 9-079 B69-0 91B69-249B6 9 - 1 0 5 B 69-111B6 9 - 1 0 9 B69-115B6 9-087 B70-26 1 A B69-24 1 B69-057B69-169B70-221B6 9 -039 B 6 9 - 0 3 7 B69-071B69-223B69-165 B69-107B 6 9-113 B 69-1 71E B6 9 - 0 3 5 B6 9 -03 3 B69-227B69-095B69-099bB69-06 7 B69-123 B69-093B69-085B69-097 B6 9-155B69-229B69-173B69-159 B69-149 B69-233 B69-021B70-271B69-151B 69-077 B 6 9-089 B69-099 B7 0-269 B7 0 -273 B69-049B69-023B69-225MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 20 MAP 21 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 14 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 330 SCUGOG STREETB O NS A VENUE L A U R E LW O O D S T R E E T GIM BLETTSTREETCOLV ILL E AVENU E WYSE GATEWILL EYDRIV EALLWORTHCRESCENTGOODW IN AVENUEBROUG H COURT DARRYL CASWELL WAY CO URTNEY STREET BIRMIN GHAM AVENUEALLWORTHCRESCENTHONEYMANDRIVEB 7 0 - 2 3 3B69-221B70-087B70-303B70 -061B70-251B70-069B 6 9-016B69-017 B70-171 B 7 0 -1 1 1B69-101B70-123B70-299B 7 0- 2 7 7 B70-213B70-117B70-209 B70-287 B70-283 B70-159 B70-103B70-2 49 B7 0 -223 B 7 0 - 2 4 3 B70-075B70 -1 01 B 7 0 - 2 3 5 B7 0-1 33 B70-307 B70-121B70 -129 B70-1 4 1B70-161B70-165B7 0-225 B70-247B70-2 8 5 B70-291 B70-211 B70-137B70-301 B 7 0 - 2 3 1 B7 0 - 0 7 3B70-169B 7 0 - 2 3 9 B70-229B70-245B70-227 B70-0 9 9B70-221B70-06 7B70-293B70-207 B70-065 B70-167 B70-163 B70-079B70-26 1 A B7 0-063 B70 -265 B70-085B70-253B70-255B70-139B70-125B70-289B70-127B70-275B 70 -26 7 B70-263B70-261B B70 -131 B70-25 9B70-281B70-081B 7 0 - 1 0 7 B70 -255B B70-237B 7 0 - 1 0 5 B70-077B70-2 73 B70-257B69-021B70-271B7 0-269 B70-071B69-049B70-109B69-023MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 20 MAP 21 MAP 22 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 15 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 331 LANDER CRESCENTCL AYTON CRESCE N TALLISON STREETLAN D ER CRESCE N T L ONGW ORTH A V E NUE JENNIN G S D RI V E LANDER C RESC E N T B O NS AVE N U E ARGENTSTREETFREEL A N D A V E N U E ALDCROFT CRESCENTBROUG H COURT WILLEYDRIVE LIBERT Y STREET NORTHGO ODWIN AVENU E LOBB COURTALLWORTH CRESCENTB70-087B 5 4-141B53-099B54-149B52-031B55-287B53-1 0 5 B 7 0 - 0 4 9B70-045B70-135B 5 5-2 77 B52-029 B70-123 B55-29 3B70-149B55-285B55-297B5 3 - 0 8 4 B54 -131 B7 0 - 0 7 3 B70-117B 7 0 -0 3 5B70-037B55-283B 54-1 47B55-299B 7 0 - 0 4 3 B70-0 5 1 B70-075B70-219 B7 0-1 33B55-291B70-121B54-151 B55-281 B70-161B70-165B70-167 B70-159 B70-057 B53-079B70-057bB70-047B70-06 7 B54-153B55-301B70-065B70-185B55-279B70-163 B55-239 B70-055B7 0-063 B53-093B70-137B70-085B52-033B70-143B70-139B70-06 1 B70 -05 9B70-125B70-127B70-053B53-091B53-089B55-28 9 B70-175 B 70-14 7B70-145B53-083B70-151B 5 2 - 0 3 5 B70-14 1 B70-173 B53-087B70 -131 B7 0-15 3 B70-155 B53-085B70-157B70-077B55-241 B53 -08 1B70-039B70-041MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 21 MAP 22 MAP 23 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 16 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 332 EL DA D DR IVE CL A Y TO N C R ESC E N TLIBERTYSTREETNORTH L O NGWOR TH AVE N U E LAPR A D E S Q UARE COURVI ERCRESCENTBROOKIN G STREETQUACKENBUSH STREET LAP R ADE SQUARE SWINDELLS STREETLOBB COURTWILL IAM COWLES DR IVE B54-145 B54-035B53-099B54-149B54-0 11B55-287B55 -143 B53-1 0 5 B54-051B53-0 79 B55-29 3 B55-285 B54-0 45B55-297B54-103B54-121B55-209 B5 4 -09 9 B 5 4 -043B55-283B55-147 BB54-135B54-105B54-047B54-125B55-213B5 4-11 3 B 54-057B54-107 B54-075B54-067B54-071B53-083B54-079 B54-085 B 54 -13 7 B54 -117 B54-03 1 B 54-095B55-291B54-029B54-041B54-151 B54-111B5 4 -065 B54-089 B55-211 B55-281 B53-103B54-115B54-101B54 -069 B54-119B 5 4-073 B54-0 7 7 B54-155 B54-039 B 5 4 - 03 3 B54-063B5 5 - 2 3 3 B54-153B55-301B 5 4 -049 B54-087B54-143B 54-147 B55-205 B55-279B53-093B55-237SB54-083B55-235B54-0 09 B54-0 27 B54-025B54-141 B55-147AB53-091B53-101B53-089B55-237B55-28 9 B55-239 B55-241 B54-1 3 9 B54-059 B54 -081 B54-127B53-087B55-2 7 7 B53-085 B54-0 9 1 WB54-133B54-097B54-061B55-145B54-091B53-081 B5 4 -093 B54-037B54-13 1 B54-093SB5 4-129 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 22 MAP 23 MAP 24 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 17 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 333 ELEPH ANT H ILL D RIVE ELD AD DRI V E LONGW O R T H A V ENUE TAFTPLACEANNI SSONCOURTBROOKINGSTREETMAXWE L L COURT RICKA BY STREETTAF T PLACE MEARNS AVENUESCOTTSDALEDRIVEBR EN T CR E S CEN TWILL I AMCOWLESDRIVE STEPH E NS GU LCH DRIV E B55 - 1 95 B54-035B55-131B 5 5 - 0 0 1 B55-153B55-141B59-001B5 4 -093 B59-003 B55-011B55-189B55-203 B54-007B54-025B55-00 3 B55-211 B54 -15 5 B5 5 -005 B55-177B55-187B55-213 B 5 5-009B55-019B55-167B54-03 1 B55-169B 54-095 B54-029B 5 5 -179 B55 -139 B55 -129 B 5 5 -1 8 1B55-157B5 4 -011 B 5 4 - 0 3 3 B 5 4-02 7 B55-20 1 B55-259B5 5 - 1 7 1 B55-007B55-199B55-19 3 B55-143 B55-185B5 4 -0 09 B 60-0 01 B55-008 B55-175B55 -165 B55-155B55-147AB55-159BB55-127B55-183B55-125B 55-161 B55-205 B55-159AB55-163B55 -137 B55-013B55-197B 55-147B B55-173B 55-151B55-145B55-149B55 -135 B54-037B54-093SB55-017B60 B55 B59 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 23 MAP 24 MAP 25 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 18 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 334 ELEPH A N T HILL D RI V EELDAD DRIVETAFTPLACELONGW ORTH AV E NUE MADDE N PL A CE TAF T PLACE CROUGHSTREETMEARNS AVENUECOTTO N S T RE ET BR EN T CR E S CEN T MADDE N PL ACEB55-017 B41-147 B 5 5 - 0 0 1 B41 - 1 55B41-115B41-201B59-001B41-111B41-127B4 1 - 1 3 1 B55-00 3 B5 5 -005 B41-135 B59-005B59-003 B55 -201 B55-00 9 B41-141B59-009B41-199B41-137B41-145B59-007B4 1 - 1 3 3 B 4 1 -1 3 9 B4 1-14 3 B41-149B55-007 B41-1 51B55-197B41-157B41-117B41-119B 6 0-0 01 B41-153 B55-008 B41-113 B 41-15 9B55-013B41-129B60 B55 B59 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 24 MAP 25 MAP 26 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 19 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 335 LONG W ORT H AV ENU E JACKMANROADW E S T S C U G O G L A N E KELMANPLACEWILLO U GHBY PLAC E VE S NA C OURTTERRY CRESCENTMILL LANEB69-016 B69-017B62-003B6 2 - 0 0 7 B58-013B63-001B62-001B52-037B52-011B52 - 0 4 5 B6 9 -00 5 B52-013B69-117B6 9 - 0 0 9B69-115B52-003B69-015B5 2-055B52-053 B 62-00 5 B6 9 - 0 3 5 B6 9 - 0 3 3 B69-029 B52-001B69-021B6 9 - 0 3 1 B52-051B52-017B6 9 - 027 B 6 9 - 025 B52 B62 B63 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 20 MAP 21 MAP 29 MAP 30 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 20 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 336 L A U R E L WO O D S T R E E T GOODWI N AVENU E STREATHERN WAY MEADOWVIEW BOULEVARDDOLANCOURTKELMANPLACE SCUGOG STREETMA RKHA M TRAI L VESN A COUR T KEN BROMLEY LANEDON MORRIS COURT4TH S TREE TBIRMINGHAMAVENUEMILL L AN E DAL E Y A VEN UE LONGW ORTHAVENUEWILLEY DRIVEHOGANCRESCENTS O M E R S C A L E S D R I V E B58-005B58-007 B69-019 B70-087B52-005B 58-003 B 7 0 -0 0 3 B70-023 B70-011B 7 0 - 0 1 9 B70-095 B13 -00 3 B 5 2 - 0 2 1 B70-017B69-016 B69-017B13-029B6 9-0 11 B13-063 B1 3-0 21 B13-015B13-049B58-012 B69- 0 0 3 B58-013B52-037B70-077B58-0 0 9 B13 -047 B 13-013 B 13 -019B58-001B70-021B52-007B70-037B13 -0 17B70-103B13-01 1 B 52-057B 7 0 - 0 2 9 B13-0 3 5 B52-013B70-1 0 1 B52 - 0 4 5 B13 -045 B69-009 B52-003B13-023B13-051 B52-047 B70-099 B 52-055B52-053 B13-0 3 3B70-025B13-025 B13-03 1 B13-053 B70 -0 97 B70-027B70-001B70-085B52-011B52-001B69-021B70-015B69-0 0 5 B13-027B 6 9 - 0 2 5 B52-051B52-019B52-017B70-031B70-083B 7 0 - 0 8 9B69-015B70-081B 7 0 - 1 0 5 B 7 0 - 0 9 1 B 7 0 - 0 9 3 B58-006B 7 0 - 1 1 1 B58-011B69-013B70-013B69-001B52 B58 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 20 MAP 21 MAP 22 MAP 29 MAP 30 MAP 31 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 21 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 337 CLAYTO N C R E S C E N T SUNICR E S T B O U L E V A RD S H O R E V I E W C O U R T VA N STONE C O U RTARGENTSTREETLONGWORTHAVENUE ELGIN STREETHIGH STREETMEADO W VIEW B O U L E VARD SUNSET ROADSUN ICR ES T COU RT WILLEY DRIVE SUMME R FI E LD COU R TALDCROFT CRESCENTSH O R E V I E W DRIV E HILLTOPDRIVE DALEY AV ENU E 4TH ST R E E THOGA N C RE SCENTCLAY TON CRE S CENT B25-053B25-059B52-031B 7 0 - 0 1 9 B53-1 0 5 B53-131B12-021B2 5 - 0 2 3B B13-063B25-051NB13-041B13-049B53-0 6 7 B53-053B70-077B25-0 3 1 B25-0 0 5 B13 -047 B13-027B7 0 - 0 8 9 B70-021 B52-025 B13-01 1 B 5 3-07 1 B70-1 1 5 B13-03 9 B1 3 -0 3 5 B25-039B53-1 13 B5 3 -047 B 53-05 5 B 25 -029B13-051B70-033B52-029 B 13 -031 B 7 0 - 0 3 5 B53-051B53-133B13-043B 7 0 - 0 2 9 B13-0 3 3B70-025B53-0 6 3 B1 3-0 3 7 B53-080 B53-061B13-053B53-075B70-027B53-07 9B70-085B52-033B53-083B53-05 9B70-113B53-073B25-037B70-037B52-0 27 B53-057B 1 3-045 B52-023B70-039B 53-078 B 53-049 B53-069 B 5 3-0 77 B53-081 B13-044B70-03 1 B 2 5-035 B53-065 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 21 MAP 22 MAP 23 MAP 30 MAP 31 MAP 32 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 22 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 338 S C OTTSDA L E D RI V E CLAYTO N CRESCE NT LIBERTY STREET NORTHS UMMER FI E L D COU RT MEAD O WVIEW B OU L EVARD BERNARDSTREETSWI NDELLS STREETREDFE R N CRESC E N T SUN IC R EST BO U L E V A R D V AN ST O NE C O UR T 3RD S TR EETHILLTOPDRIVECOURVIERCRESCENTSUNSET R OA D B53-001 B53-1 2 1 B5 4 - 0 5 5 B53-02 1 B54-011 B53-123B53-1 0 5 B53-131B53-109B54-003 B53-07 9 B53-085B40-075B5 4-053 B54-021 B53-107 B53-009B53-041 B4 0-06 7 B 5 4 - 0 0 1 B34-131B54-045 B25-003 B25-001B53-025B53-027B83-019 B54-043 B8 3-01 1 B83-013B 83-005 B83-023B54-029 B54-0 1 9 B5 3-0 11 B53-057B34-135 B40-0 6 9 B83-00 1B53-083 B53-029 B34-133B8 3 -0 1 5 B53-039B53-005B8 3 -0 2 1 B53-0 3 1 B 83 -0 2 7B54-047B54-041B8 3-029 B 83-031 B53-015B54-0 2 3 B83-003SB53-023B83-025B54-063B 25-005 B83-0 0 3 B53-035B54-057B83-009B54-051B54-005 B53-045 B53-11 3 B54-039 B54-027 B54-049 B40-079B53-003B53-007B53-133B 54-017B53-103B 5 3-1 2 9B53-075B53-119B54-059 B53-04 3B53-117 B 53-01 9 B53-03 7B53-073B53-115B53-101B53-111B54-025B53-013B 53-0 49 B53 -07 7 B53-047 B53-081 B54-015 B53-127B54-009 B53-033B54-013B53 -125 B53-0 7 1 B53 B54 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 22 MAP 23 MAP 24 MAP 31 MAP 32 MAP 33 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 23 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 339 ELEPHANT HILL DRIVEAPPLE BLOSSOM BOULEVARDSCOTTS D A L E DRIVE BRENTCRESCENT RE DF ERN CRE SCE NT ANNISSO NCOURTBARLOWCOURTMA C O NN A C H I E P LA C E MANN STREETIRELAN D STREE T BRADSHAWSTREETLYLE D RIVE TILLEYROADSWINDELLS STREETLYLE DRI VEB4 0-065 B53-001 B40-021B40-025B54-003 B54-015 B40-071B40-075B83-023B53-009B53 -031 B 8 3 -02 7 B 5 4 - 0 0 1 B40-027B40-045B40-041B4 0 - 03 5B55-183B 4 0 - 0 3 3 B 4 0- 0 3 9 B40-05 5B54-029 B83-029 B40-0 6 9 B40-0 6 1B53-005B54-025 B55-179 B40-059B 83-031 B40 -063 B4 0 - 0 5 1B40-1 13 B41-013B54-011 B40-053B54-005 B41-0 8 3 B4 0-06 7 B40-04 7 B40-079B53-003B40-019B40-031B 4 0-02 9 B40-081B40-087B40-037 B40-0 5 7 B41-081B55-259B4 1 -017 B41-015B40-049B40-023B54-007B53-127B54-009 B53-033B54-013 B53 B54 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 23 MAP 24 MAP 25 MAP 32 MAP 33 MAP 34 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 24 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 340 ELEPHANTHILL DR IVE KERSHAW STREETGUIL DW OOD DRIV E L O W NIE CO UR T SPRUCEWOODCRESCENTHUTTO N PLAC E BUDDLANEMADDE N PLACE ELEPHA N T HILL DRI V E APPLE BLOSS O M BOU L E V A R D BRADSHAWSTREETSPRUCE W OOD CRESCE N T LYLE DRIV E IRELAN D S T R E E T MEARNS AVENUEMADDENPLACEEDGERT O N D RIVELYLE DR IVE H UTTO N PLACE B41-077B41-0 2 9 B41- 1 5 5 B41-1 7 5 B41-037B41 -19 3 B41-167 B41-033B41-179B41-101B4 0 - 0 3 3 B41-103B41-18 9 B56 -02 1 B41-181 B40-0 29 B56 -029B41-127B41-187B41-191B41-183B41-163B56 -019B41-023B4 1 - 0 2 7 B41-203B41-123B41-013B4 1 -08 3 B56 -027B41-035B41-185 A B40-031B41-039B41-109B41-105 B41-0 99 B 4 1 -18 5BB41-169B4 1 - 1 2 5B41-111B41-107B41-197B5 6 -0 2 5 B41-085 B41-129B41-157B41 -113B41-041 B41-161 B41-087 B41 -031 B41-171 B41 -095B41-153B41-079B41-173B41 -177A B41-159 B56-023B41-177 B B4 1 -16 5 B41-151 B 41-025 B41-015B 41-021 B41-089B41 - 0 1 9 B41-093 B41-01 7 B41-04 3 B41-091B41-097 B41-081 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 24 MAP 25 MAP 26 MAP 33 MAP 34 MAP 35 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 25 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 341 G U I L D W O O D D RIV E LOWNI E COURT HUTTO N PLAC E MADDE N PLACE SP R UCEWO O D C R ES C EN T BUDDLANEHUT T ON P LAC E DART COURTB41 - 1 7 5 B56-039B56-003B 5 6-0 0 5B56-007B56-0 2 1 B41-181 B41-185 A B41-127B5 6 - 0 1 1B41-183B56-037B56 -019 B 5 6-0 01B41-203 B56-027 B5 6-0 1 7A B 56-029 B41-121B56-041B4 1 - 1 2 5 B56-035B5 6 -025 B56-009B41-129B41-151 B41-123 B5 6-0 31B41-173 B56 -017B B56 -0 15 B41-097 B5 6-033 B56-023B41-171 B41-09 9 B 5 6 - 0 1 3 B56 MAP 19 MAP 25 MAP 26 MAP 34 MAP 35 MAP 36 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 26 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 342 CARL RABY STREETGREEN ROAD K I L P A T R I C K C O U R T B89-083 B8 9 - 1 19 B89-117B89 -111B89-093B89-099B89-085 A B89-095B89-113B89 -097 B89-115B 89-101 MAP 27 MAP 28 MAP 37 MAP 38 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 27 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 343 GREENROADK I L P A T R I C K C O U R T B89-117 B89 -111 B89-113B89-115 MAP 27 MAP 28 MAP 37 MAP 38 MAP 39 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 28 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 344 BOWMANVILLE AVENUELINDEN LANELUV ERME C O U R T LIND EN LAN E DON MORRIS COURTLONGWO R T H A VENUE JACKMAN ROAD B52 -04 3B6 2 - 0 0 7 B63-001B62-001 B52 - 0 4 5 B 5 2-0 41 B52-049B52-039B62-0 0 5 B52-017B52-037B62 B63 MAP 20 MAP 21 MAP 29 MAP 30 MAP 39 MAP 40 MAP 41 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 29 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 345 SCUGOG STREETCA R L S O N PLA C E SAW MILL CO URT 2ND ST R E ET 4TH ST R E E T STURRO C K AV ENUEBARBARA STREETDON MORRIS COURTJACKMAN ROAD FREDE RICK A V E NUE PROSPECT STREETREHD ER AVE N U E EDSAL L AV EN UE B52-04 3 B1 3-006 B13-063B13-021 B 4 7 - 0 1 1 B47-01 5 B04-068 B82-11 1 B47-0 0 1 B 0 4 - 0 5 9B47-005B13-057B82-003B82-001B8 2 - 0 0 9 B13-01 9 B13-017B13-025B47-009B13-011 B13-001 B 52-04 1 B13-009 B13-0 07 B52-049 B13-003 B13-005B52-039B 8 2-00 7 B47-003 B13-023B04-057B47-00 7 B13-059 B82-005 B52 - 0 4 5B52-017B52-037B47-013 B04-061B04-067B04-063B04-065B13-061B13-055B47 B13 MAP 20 MAP 21 MAP 22 MAP 29 MAP 30 MAP 31 MAP 40 MAP 41 MAP 42 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 30 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 346 SCUGOG STREETPROSPECT STREET 4TH STREET HI GH STREETEDS ALL AV ENUE HIGH STREETODELL STREETLAMBS LANE2ND ST R EET 1 ST STR E ET 3RD ST R EET REHD E R AVE N UE V ETE R A N S AVEN UE O D ELL STR E E T 2ND STR EET ODELL S TRE E T SUMME R FI E L D C O U R T PROUTDRIVEPROUT DR IVE ELGI N STREET B12-007 B25-043 B1 2 -02 3B25-053 B 1 2 - 0 2 9B25-059B04-051B04-067B13-063B25-051NB12-019 B34-155B 12 - 0 01 B 25-0 11 B 1 2- 0 0 3 B3 4-1 53 B 0 4 - 0 5 9 B25-03 1 B13-057B12-031B 2 5-0 0 9 B13-011 B25-041 B25-00 7 B12-005B34-063B25-037B25-029 B12-009B13-059 B25-005 B04-057B3 4 -105AB12-017B12 -027 B 3 4-053 B12 -0 25B12-033B34-163B34-105B34-161B12-011B12-013B34-157B04-061B25-039B04-063B04-065B12-021B12-015B13-055B12 MAP 21 MAP 22 MAP 23 MAP 30 MAP 31 MAP 32 MAP 41 MAP 42 MAP 43 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 31 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 347 SAUNDERSCOURTHI GH STREET SUMME R FI E L D COURT BEECH AVENUEHIGH STREETBERNARD STREET1ST S TREET CENTRE STREETOD ELL STR E E T LIBERTY STREET NORTHELGIN STREET LO RRAINE COURT PROUT DRIVEBURK COURTFARNCOMBCRESCENTBO RLAND C OURT BURK C OURT SAUND ERS AVENU E 3RD ST R E E T CO NCESS ION STR E E T WE ST PR OU T DRIV E B34 -037 B 3 4 - 1 1 1 B34-163 B34-043 B40-071B34-155B34-117B34-073B3 4-1 53 B40-067B34-135B25-003 B3 4 -12 5 B34-113B34-119B3 4 -041 B34-035B34-077B34-067B2 5-009 B3 4 -12 1 B34 -039 B34-1 2 3 B34-101 B40-0 7 3 B25-00 7 B34-133B25-001B34-063 B40 -077A B34-085B34-075 B40-075B34-0 79 B34-065B34-091 B34-11 5 B 3 4-09 9 B34 -109 B40-079B34-097 B34 -105A B34-069B 34 -081 B 3 4-051 B25-00 5 B34-049 B34-129B34-107B34-161 B34-053 B34 -103 B34-089B34-157B40-077BB34-105B34-083B34-127B34-131B 34-045 B3 4-047 B34-093B34-087 B3 4-07 1 B12 B25 MAP 22 MAP 23 MAP 24 MAP 31 MAP 32 MAP 33 MAP 42 MAP 43 MAP 44 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 32 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 348 CONCE S SI O N STREE T E A S TAPPLE BLOSSOM BOULEVARDT R U D EAU DR IVE SA UNDER S AVEN UE BARKERCOURTTRUDEAU DR I VEB ORL A ND COUR T HENDRYGATEHERR IMAN STRE ET LI BERTY STREET NORTH TUCKE R R OAD TRUDE AU DRIV EMANN STREETGL A N VIL LE C R ESC ENT MAR CHW OO D CRESCE N TFARNCOMBCRESCENTB34-037 B40-005B40-065 B3 4 - 0 3 3 B34- 1 4 3 B B34 - 0 1 3 B34-043 B40-009B40-071 B40-1 1 1 B3 4-0 0 7 B34-141 B34 -0 81 B40-003 B3 4-041 B34-101 B40-083 B34-035B40-023 B40-0 6 9 B34 -0 39 B40-0 7 3 B4 0 - 0 6 1 B34-139B34-143AB40-063 B34-129B41-015B21-023 B34-027B B34-147B34-085B34-005B40-075B41-011B34 -071 B34-091 B40-067 B 34-099B34-127B40-081 B34 -045 B40-079B34-097 B40-1 05B40-085B 3 4 -02 1 B 3 4-015 B34-011B40-017B40 -015 B40-011 B34-089B 34-031 B41-013B40-013B34-027AB40-095B40-101 B34-023B40-077BB40-099B40-103 B40-077A B40-087B40-007B34-083 B 34-019 B40 -093B40-089 B34-02 9 B34-017 B 34-145 B 34-025B34-093B34-137 B40 -107 B4 0-091 B34-087 B40-0 97 B40-019B40-109 MAP 23 MAP 24 MAP 25 MAP 32 MAP 33 MAP 34 MAP 43 MAP 44 MAP 45 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 33 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 349 GUILDW O O D DRIVE ORCHARDPARK DR I VEOR R CO URT KERSHAW STREETCHA NC E COUR T CON CESSIO N STREE T EA ST MARC HWO OD CRESC E NT MERRYFI E L D COURTSQUIREFLETCHERDRIVE MEARNS AVENUEMANN STREET EDGERT O N D RI V E FLAXM A N AVENU E TRUDEAU DR IVE BRADSHAWSTREETD ADSON D RIVE B40-005B3 7 - 0 3 5 A B34- 0 1 3 B38-041B34 -025 B40-009 B34-009B40-1 1 1 B38-04 3 AB41-039B41-057B3 8-02 3 B41-003B41-005B34-003B38- 0 2 7 B37-033B41-053B38-025 B41 -0 47 B56-02 9 B38-0 33 B41-059 B38-011B41-065 B3 4 -02 1 B41-015B 41-049 B 40-0 11 B4 1-06 1 B 3 8-013B38-029B37-035B4 1-067 B38-043BB34-005B41-041 B38-015B56-027 B41-011B 3 4-0 0 7 B41-052B34-015 B56-023B34-011 B41-073 B38-017B40-019B3 8 -019 B41-051B41-079B37 -039AB41-009B41-077B4 0 - 0 0 3 B38-021B38-031B37-043B41-069B41-007 B38-04 7B41-013B 38-037 B38-04 5 B41-0 71 B40-007B41-075 B3 8-0 35 B40-001 B41 -045 B34-017 B3 8-039 B34-00 1 B 4 0-107 B41-043 B41-055 B 34-0 19 B37-041B41-001B40-109 B41B40 B34 MAP 24 MAP 25 MAP 26 MAP 33 MAP 34 MAP 35 MAP 44 MAP 45 MAP 46 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 34 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 350 GUILD W O O D DRIVE SOPER C R E E K DR IVEBUDDLANE DARTCOURTMEARNS AVENUESQUIR E F L ETCHE R D RIVE MCFEETERSCRESCENTCONCE S SI O N S TRE E T E AS T DADSON DR IVE DOWNHA M DRIVE BARLEY MILL CRESCENT B3 7 - 0 3 5 AB38-041B38-04 3 AB41-057B56-039B36-003B36-027 B3 6-013B37-033B41-053B36-009B36-077B 36-045B36 -047 B36-087B38-021B36-057B3 6-07 5 B3 6 - 065 B36-025B 36-021 B36-059B41-0 59 B36-081 B 36-063 B3 6 - 0 1 5 B36-053B41-055 B36-043B 36-029B36-067B3 6 -017 B36-005B38 -0 45 B 36-0 41 B36-03 9 B36-061B36-079B36-033B3 6 -05 1 B36-011B36-069B36 - 0 3 7 B56-02 9 B36-055 B4 1-06 1 B36 -071A B 38-019 B56-041B36-04 9 B37-035B3 6 - 0 0 1 B 36-019B38-043BB38-015B56-027 B36-073 B36-023B41-052B36-085B56-023 B36 - 0 0 7 B38-017 B 36-035B36-083AB41-051B38-039 B56-031 B37 -039AB37-043 B3 6-031B 4 1-063 B37-039B36-083 B B37-037B37-041B36-071 B36 MAP 25 MAP 26 MAP 34 MAP 35 MAP 36 MAP 45 MAP 46 MAP 47 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 35 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 351 B A R L E Y M I L L C R E S C E N T CONCE S SI O N S T R E E T E A S T LAMBS ROAD B36-063 B36-003B36-057B36-059B36-005B36-055B36-061B3 6 - 0 0 1 B36-0 3 5B36-00 7 B36 MAP 26 MAP 35 MAP 36 MAP 46 MAP 47 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 36 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 352 GREEN ROADDAI GLE LANEMURRAY TABB STREETQU ICK TRAIL QUICK T R AI L ROSS W RI G H T A V E N U E CARL RABY STREETMEACHIN GATEBOSWELL DR IVEFORSEY LANEGOUGH L A N E HICKS LANEHOVEY LANE BROOKHILL BOULEVARD TED MILLER CRESCENT SUMER S F ORD DRIVE B89-103B8 9 - 0 4 1 B89-061B89 -0 13 B89-065B89-025B89 - 0 6 9 A B8 9 -07 5 B89-029 B89-00 7 B8 8-009B89-021B88-011 B89-085 B89-081B89-091B89-099B 89-0 8 7 B89-055 B8 9-033 B89-023B89-037 B88-021B89-095B89-093 B89-0 27 B89-113B89-039 B89-049B89-015B 8 7-003 B89-073B89-067B89 -035 B 88-017 B89-047 B88-023B89-043B89-059B48-292B89-11 1 B89-019B89-051B89-053B89-089 B89-097 B89-045B89-083 B89-085 A B89-071 B8 9-077 B 89-0 57 B87-009 B8 9-0 0 5 B 8 9 -063 B89-031B89-069 B89-101 B87-005B89-115B89-109B89-079 B87-007 B88-013 B89-011 B88-015 B89-077A B89-107B89-009 MAP 27 MAP 28 MAP 37 MAP 38 MAP 48 MAP 49 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 37 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 353 BR O OKHI LL BOUL EVARDDAIGLE LANESTE V ENS RO A D HA RVEY J O N E S A V E N U E Q U I C K T R A IL HICKS LANESUMERSFORD DR IVE PU R DY P LACE GREEN ROADTED MILLER CRESCENTB77-003bB89-065B89 - 0 6 9 A B88-003B8 9-0 7 5 B88-025 B89-077A B4 8-345 B89-003 B89-009 B8 9-0 01 B89-00 7 B 88 -009 B88-011 B 8 9-063 B77-003B89-113B88-001B88-019B 88-005B89-067 B 86-003 B86 -007B88-027 B88-013 B87-005 B89-073B89-11 1 B8 9-057 B8 9-077 B87-001B 89-0 05 B89-105 B87 -003B89-115B89-109B 86-0 05B89-107B88 B87 B89 MAP 27 MAP 28 MAP 37 MAP 38 MAP 39 MAP 48 MAP 49 MAP 50 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 38 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 354 BOWMANVILLE AVENUECLARI NGTON BOULEVARDLUVER M E COURT BROOK HILL B OULEV A RD STEVE NS ROA DB77-003bB 77-0 01 B4 8-345 B 48-3 47 B86-001 B9 1 -005 B91-019B91-0 0 9 B91-017B77-003 B64 -00 5 B91-0 2 3 B64-0 1 1 B6 4-009 B 9 1- 0 0 7 B48-335B86-005 B91-011B86 -003 B64-007 B77 B86 MAP 28 MAP 29 MAP 38 MAP 39 MAP 40 MAP 49 MAP 50 MAP 51 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 39 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 355 KING STR EET WESTKING STREET WEST LUVER M E C O U R T S T EVENS R O A D KING S TREE T WE STBOWMANVILLE AVENUEMUNDAY COURT B 6 4 -0 01 B65-001B91-0 29 B 66-001B91-019B91-0 0 9 B91-017B64-00 3 B 9 1-00 5B 91-02 3 B 9 1- 0 0 7 B 64-005 B91-011B64 -007 B9 1-003 B91-001B66 B65 B64 B91 MAP 29 MAP 30 MAP 39 MAP 40 MAP 41 MAP 50 MAP 51 MAP 52 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 40 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 356 KING S HILL LANE SCUGOG STREETWAVERLEYROADROENIGK DRI VEWELLINGTON STREET STURRO C K AVENUE CH A P E L S T R E E T STEV ENS ROAD KING S T RE ET WEST B07-013B84-005 B07-023B0 7 - 0 1 9 B 0 7 - 0 1 7 B07-005B07-009B8 4-001B 07-001 B84-003B 0 7-0 21 B04-057B07-015 B07-007 B04 B07 MAP 29 MAP 30 MAP 31 MAP 40 MAP 41 MAP 42 MAP 51 MAP 52 MAP 53 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 41 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 357 PROSPECT STREET CHUR CH STRE E T LAMBSLANEWELLIN G T O N S T R E E T CHAPELSTREETKIN G STR E E T EASTROENIGK DRI VEODELL S T R E E T CONCE S SI O N STRE E T W E S T STURRO C K AVENUE SILVER STREETQUEEN STR EET TEMPERANCE STREETWELLINGTON STREET ELGIN STREETODELL S T R E E T SCUGOG STREETHORSEYSTREET KING ST REET WEST B08-013 B34-055B09-02 7 B20-107B21-055B04-053 B04-003 B0 4-0 17 B09-001B07-005B04-051B09-017B21-0 9 1 B0 4-037B09-013B04-027 B09-019B04-041B04-007B 07-001 B04-015B04-011B08-007 B 08-0 03 B09-005 B34-057B 08-00 1 B09-023B09-015B04-005B34-059B04-021B04-029 B34-063 B08-011 B21-089 B08-0 0 9 B20-079 B21-093B04-057B04-035B04-023B08-005 B09-009 B09-0 1 1 B07-007 B09-003 B21-0 5 3 B04-043 B21-095 B04-047B04-049B04-0 3 3 B34 -061 B04-0 3 9 B34-053 B04-009 B04-045 B04-031 B 04-001 B09-007B09 B08 B04 B07 MAP 30 MAP 31 MAP 32 MAP 41 MAP 42 MAP 43 MAP 52 MAP 53 MAP 54 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 42 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 358 HORS E Y STRE E T L IBER TY PLACELOWE STREE T KING S T R E ET E A S T BURKCOURTCHUR CH ST REET CONCE S SI O N STREET W E S THIGH STREETCENTRE STREETALEXANDERBOULEVARDGEORGE STREETDIVISION STREETTEMPERANCE STREETGRANTS L A N E SILVER STREETELGIN STREETONTARIO STREETCARLI SLE AVE NUE WELL INGTON STREET LOVER S LAN EBEECH AVENUEB20-081B34-055B20-057B 20-12 9B21-055B21-087 B20-095B21-0 37 B20-103B2 1 - 0 6 7 B20-121B21-081B21-043B09-017B21-027B21-0 9 1 B09-009 B20-087B20-117B20-125B21-033 B21-085 B21-094 B32-047B34-057B20-119B21 -041 B 21-079 B09-015B 21 -092 B20-059B34-059B20-091B32-0 4 9 B20-061 B32-069B21-063 B21-014 B34-061 B20-083 B21-025B20-099B21-09 0 B20-073 B21-029 B20-086 B21-065 B32-0 5 3 B20-067 B09-0 1 1 B20-107B 21-035 B21-0 5 3 B20-078 B04-043B04-047B20-065 B21-0 8 9 B21-039 B21-016B21-059B34-051 B34-049 B20-071B21-061 B20-0 7 9 B20-077 AB21-083B21-073B20-069 B32- 0 51 B34-053 B20-075 MAP 31 MAP 32 MAP 33 MAP 42 MAP 43 MAP 44 MAP 53 MAP 54 MAP 55 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 43 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 359 LIBE RTY STREET NORTHGEORGESTREETWELLINGTONSTREE T TRUDE A U D RI V E BROWN STREETW ELLINGTON STREET CHUR CH S TREE T LIBERT Y PLACE ONTARIO STREETAL EX A N D ER BO UL EVA RD MARCH W O O D CRESCE N T LOVER S LA NE CARLIS L E AVENU E B20-011B20-057B20-017B 21-075 B21-084 B2 1 - 0 6 7 B34 - 1 4 3 B B21 -0 01 B34-14 9 B21-081B20-033B21-015B21-017B21-007B34-141 B20 -027B20-013B20-067 B20-113B21-094 B20-109B21-088 B20-019B21-021B21-077 B2 0-007 B20-047B21-011 B 2 1 -092 B20-059B21-009B20-001 B20-03 7B21-065 B34-147 B32-069B21-0 7 9 B20-009 B20-021B20-049 B2 1-090 B21-023B20-061 B20-023 B20-025 B 20-005 B20-031B21-019B20-051B20-05 5 B2 0-035 B 2 1-008 B2 0-003B20-065 B21-016 B21-0 14 B20-053 B34-021B34-143AB20-063 B34-019 B34-145 B34-151 B20-029B20-075 B20-043B20 B21 MAP 32 MAP 33 MAP 34 MAP 43 MAP 44 MAP 45 MAP 54 MAP 55 MAP 56 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 44 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 360 C HURC H STREET ORCHARDPARK DRIVE SIMP SON AVENUEPEACHTREECRESCENTKING ST R EET EA ST C LIMI E COURT ST GEORGESTREETNORTHSTRATHMANORDRIVE ROY AL P I N ES COUR T MERRY FI E L D COURT TRUD E A U DRIV E KINGSCO URT ROADGALBRAIT H COURTB38-049B45- 0 0 5 B 2 0 - 0 4 1 B45-007B20-033B20-115 B18-007B44-005 B20-039B38-021B44-011B44- 0 1 9B45-013B20-109B 44-015B44-017 B20-005 B 4 4- 0 0 7 B37-013B45-003 B20-045B4 6 -003 B18-01 5 B38-011B44-001B34-021 B20-001 B46-005 B 18-0 17 B 38-007A B38-005 B38-001B20-037 B46-001B38-013 B18 -013 B38-009 B37-035B38-017 B37-017 B44-00 9 B44-013B 2 0-035 B37-015B37-033 B38-003 B20-003B37 -019A B18-009B38-051B38-007BB38-047 B38-015B45-009B45-011B18 -0 1 1B20-043B38 B46 B45 B44 B20 MAP 33 MAP 34 MAP 35 MAP 44 MAP 45 MAP 46 MAP 55 MAP 56 MAP 57 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 45 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 361 GALBRAITH COURTKING ST R EE T EA ST PEAC HTREE CRESC ENT C LIMI E COURT ORCHARDPARK DR IVE R O Y AL PIN ES C OU R T STRATHMANORDRIVE MEARNS AVENUEBARLEY MILL CRE S C E N T B17-049 B 3 7-025 B38-003B38-021 B36- 0 2 7 B44-011B43-00 1B46-003 B37-007 B 3 7 -0 1 1 B 4 4 -0 0 7 B37-013B18 -001B36-025B3 8-0 07A B36-023 B43-005B36-029B46-005 B 18-011 B38-005 B46-001B37-021 B 3 7 -005B37-009B37-035B37-001 B38-017 B37-017 B44-00 9 B44-013B37-015B37-003B37-027 B1 8 -0 0 5B37-019BB37-02 3 B18-009 B43-003 B18-003B38-007BB37-019 A B36-031B38-015B37-029B18-007B37-033B37-037B37-031 B46 B18 B43 B37 MAP 34 MAP 35 MAP 36 MAP 45 MAP 46 MAP 47 MAP 56 MAP 57 MAP 58 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 46 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 362 REGION A L HIGHWAY 2 HAINES STREETKING STREET EAST B43-00 1 B43-005B43-003 MAP 35 MAP 36 MAP 46 MAP 47 MAP 57 MAP 58 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 47 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 363 REGIONAL HIG H WAY 2 BOSWELL DRIVEIVORYCOURTSHADY LANECRESCENTB48 -253 B48-241B48-263 B48-255 B48-257 B48 - 2 4 5B48-249B48-233 B48-243 B48-237B4 8 - 2 4 7B48-298B48-23 9 B 4 8- 2 6 1B48-259B48-295B48-305B48-296B48-251B48-235B48-294B48-292MAP 37 MAP 38 MAP 48 MAP 49 MAP 59 MAP 60 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 48 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 364 REGIONAL HIGHWAY 2 KI NGGEORGEWAYGREEN ROADBOSWELLDRIV ER E GIONA L H IGH WAY 2 KING GEORG E W AYBONATHONCRESCENTPRINCE W ILL IAM B OULEVA R D STEVEN S ROAD IVORYCOURTSHADY LANECRESCENTRUSTWOODSTREETB48 -253 B48-275B48-349B4 8 - 3 8 9B48-241B48-105 B48-2 63 B 48-303 B48-255 B48-257 B48-279B48 -2 67 B48-337B48-233B48-379B48-243 B48-291 A B48-375 B48-269B48-237B48-359B48-283B48 -26 5 B48-299 B48-281 B48-297B48-293B48-23 9 B48-385B48-381B48-383 B 4 8 - 2 6 1B48-259B48-387B48-373B48-273B48-305 B4 8-291 B48-289B48-251B48-271B4 8-343 B48-345 B48-295B48-235B48-339B48-341B48-301B48-287MAP 37 MAP 38 MAP 39 MAP 48 MAP 49 MAP 50 MAP 59 MAP 60 MAP 61 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 49 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 365 STEVE N S R O A D REGIO N A L HI G H WAY 2 PRINCE W I L L IAM BOU LEVARD KINGGEOR GEWAYGREENROADK ING G E O R GE WAY U PTOWN AVENUE RE GIONA L H IGHWA Y 2 KINGGEORGE WAYKINGGEORGE WAYCLARINGTONBOULEVARD P E T HI C K S T R E E T B48-065B48-349 B90-0 0 3B91-029 B48-079B48-073B48-405B48-4 0 7 B4 8-0 89 B48-105B48-347 B91-021B48-085B48-403B48-325B91-027B48-323B91-025B48-327 B48-409 B91-019B48-283 B91-0 0 9 B91-013B48-401 B 4 8 -0 8 3 B48-067B91-0 1 5 B91-0 2 3 B48-329B48-103 B48-077B48-3 99 B48-069B48-287B48-335B48-095B48-345 B48-097 B4 8-0 87 B91-011B4 8-09 1 B 4 8-101B48-333B 48-331 B 4 8-0 8 1 B 48-075B48-099MAP 38 MAP 39 MAP 40 MAP 49 MAP 50 MAP 51 MAP 60 MAP 61 MAP 62 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 50 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 366 ASPE N SP R INGS D R IVEPRIN C E WILLI A M BOUL E V A R D G L EN R A Y C OUR T R EGION A L HIGH W A Y 2 REGIO N A L H IG H WAY 2 BOWMANVILLE AVENUEKING S T R E E T W E S T P E T H I C K S T R E E T REGIO N AL HIGHWAY 2 RE GIONA L R O A D 5 7 KING STREET WESTMARTIN ROADMCCRIMMON CRESCENTB03-139B65-001B68-001 B91-029 B66-001 B67-005 B03-153B03 - 1 3 5B9 0 - 0 0 5 B48-079B03-145B67-009B67-001B66-005B91-021B66-003B67 -007 B68-004B91-027B 4 8 - 0 8 3 B91-025B91-019B03-137A B91-0 0 9 B91-013B91-017B4 8-1 15 B03-143 B90-001 B 48-075 B91-0 1 5 B91-0 2 3 B48-077B4 8 -09 1 B03-149B03-141B48-119B91-001B90-0 03B03-137BB48-11 7B91-011B 4 8-0 8 1 B67 B66 B65 B68 B90 MAP 39 MAP 40 MAP 41 MAP 50 MAP 51 MAP 52 MAP 61 MAP 62 MAP 63 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 51 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 367 RHONDABOULEVARDL AWREN C E CR ESCEN T ST R IKE AVEN U E KING S HILL L A N E MCCRIMMON CRESCENTCH A P E L S T R E E T LAWR E N CE G AT EBOWMANVILLE AVENUE C OLE MAN S TREE TLI TTLE AVENUEKING S T R E E T W E S T WRENNBOULEVARDROE NI G K DRI V E WAVERLEY ROADT R E WIN L A NEB03-105B03-139B03 -115 B03-087B03 - 1 35 B03-111B03-091B03-145B11-001B0 3 -067B03-131B03-113A B0 3 - 15 5 B0 3 - 1 5 7 B 03 -121 B03-113BB0 3-097 B03-075 B84-001 B4 8-11 7 B84-003B03-089B03-077B03-079B03-137A B4 8 -1 15 B03-083B03-051B03-125 B03-169 B03-109 B0 3-10 3 B03-143 B03-031B 0 3-107 B03-071 B 0 3-127 B 0 3 - 1 51 B03-11 9 B03-159B03-061B84-005B03-069 B03 -029B03-085B03 -027 B 0 3-1 47B03-149B03-049B03-065B03-153B03-141B03-161B03-055B03-163B03-059B03-137BB03-167B03-123 B03-13 3 B 03-099 B03-057B03-165B 0 3-12 9 B03 -1 17 B03 -04 7 B03-045MAP 40 MAP 41 MAP 42 MAP 51 MAP 52 MAP 53 MAP 62 MAP 63 MAP 64 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 52 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 368 HETHERINGTONDRIVECHAPELSTREETSTRIKE AVENUEWAVERLEYROADQUEE N S T R E E T TEMPERANCE STREETLITTL E AVENUECOLE AVENUEHOLGATECRESCENTROE NI G K D RI V E LAWRE N CE CRE S C ENT B0 8 - 0 1 5 B03 -067 B0 3 - 0 2 5 B08-005B08-007B03-015 B08-0 1 3 B0 3-051B03-069 B03-175B08-0 1 1 B03-033 B03-01 7B03-039B03-019 B03 - 023 B08-0 0 9 B03-031B03-061B03-041B 0 3 - 17 7 B 0 3 -047 B03-171 B03 -029B03-057B03-049B03-065B 0 3-027 B03-173B0 3 - 0 3 7 B 03-035 B03-059B03-179B03-043B03-053B03-045MAP 41 MAP 42 MAP 43 MAP 52 MAP 53 MAP 54 MAP 63 MAP 64 MAP 65 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 53 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 369 QUEEN ST R EET O N T A R I O S T R E E TGEORGE STREETRAYN E S AVENUE ARGYLESTREETD U K E S T R E E TQUEEN AVENUEDEVITTS LANEONTARIO STREETDIVISION STREETLAWRENCECRE SC EN T DUR H A M STREETB0 8 - 0 1 5 B32-039 B80-007B32-065B08-0 1 3 B 0 3 - 177 B18-03 1 B32-013B32-061 B32-0 4 9 B32-069B32-041B 3 2 - 0 1 9 B32-005B32- 0 5 3 B32-043B32-015B32-04 5 B32-007B32-063B32-04 7 B32-05 9 B 3 2 -0 3 7 B03-179 B32 -003 B32-057 B 3 2 - 0 1 7 B32- 0 5 1 B32-055 B3 2 -0 01 B32 MAP 42 MAP 43 MAP 44 MAP 53 MAP 54 MAP 55 MAP 64 MAP 65 MAP 66 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 54 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 370 BROWN STREETLIBERTY STREET SOUTHQU EEN ST RE ET VICTORIASTREETCHURCH S T R E E T W ASHING TONPLACELIBER TY STREET NORTHVICTORIA STREETMABELBRUCE WAY KING ST R E E T E A S T B R OW N S T R E E T PRINCE ST R EET ALBERT STREETNELSON STREETARGYLESTREETD U K E S T R E E T O N T A R I O S T R E E TBROWN STREETDURHAM STREETLAMBERT STREETONTARIO STREETB 3 1 - 0 5 1 B14 -053 B 32-009B14-067B14-119B20-033B 1 4-0 8 3B18-033B14-059 B32-039 B32-0 59 B32-025B20-027B14-071B14-081B80-007B32-065B 1 4-063B20-113B14 -115 B14-051B20-029B20-109 B 32-033B32-031 B 3 1- 0 4 3 B18-03 1 B32-023 B 1 4- 0 8 7 B32-00 3 B 14 -117 B32-045 B32-069B32-013B32-041B32-027 B31-047B20-02 3 B32-005B31-045B 3 2 -0 2 9 B18-02 9 B32-043B18-037B20-025 B32-015B 3 1 - 0 5 3 B18-019 B14-069B1 8-025 B20-031 B 1 8 -023 B32-02 1 B 3 2- 0 1 9 B 3 2-0 3 7 B14-061B32-007B18-027 B18 -021 B14-057 B 1 4 - 0 7 3 B 1 4 - 0 7 9B32-011B 3 2 - 0 1 7 B32-035B14-065MAP 43 MAP 44 MAP 45 MAP 54 MAP 55 MAP 56 MAP 65 MAP 66 MAP 67 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 55 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 371 FLETT STREETQUEEN S T REET NELSON STREETCHURCH STREET HOBBS D RI V E VICTORIA STREETMABELBRUCE WAY SOU THWAY D RI VEALBERT STREETKING ST R E E T E A S T B R OW N S T R E E T SOUTHWAY DRI V E JANE ST R E ET ASHDALECRESCENTST GEORGESTREETNORTHPRINCE S T REET LIBERTY STREET SOUTHST GEORGE STREET SOUTHLAMBERT STREETSIMPSON AVENUEFRANK STREETORCHARDVIEW BOULEVARDB14-043B17-061B20-111 B1 4-05 3 B16-011B14-067B14-119B20-033B17 -087 B17-0 89 B1 4 - 0 37B14-059B20-045B1 7 -063 B 1 4-063 B1 7 -095B20-113B14 -115 B1 4-0 3 9 B 1 4- 0 8 7 B18-015 B 1 6-013 B17-015B14 -0 41 B 14 -11 7 B18-009 B17-091 B18-013 B17-093 B14-03 5 B17-065B17-055B17-069B 1 4 - 0 7 9B14-069B16-015B17-067 B1 4-051 B14-045B16-017B18-021 B1 7-085 B17-059 B1 7-057 B 1 7-0 8 3 B14-061B18-017 B17-079B 14 -0 49 B17-081 B14-047B14-091B18-011 B14-057B14-065 B18-019 MAP 44 MAP 45 MAP 46 MAP 55 MAP 56 MAP 57 MAP 66 MAP 67 MAP 68 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 56 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 372 J ANE STREET SIMPSON AVENUEHOBBSDRIVEWILDE COURT P R INCE STR EE T H AILE Y C O U RT SO UTH WAY DRIV E SOPER C OUR TORCHARDVIEW BOULEVARD M O R G A N D A L E C R E S C E N T ASH DAL E C RES CENT DEERPARKCRESCENTB17 - 0 1 7B17-061 B16-0 0 5 B16-011 B17-091 B1 7-063 B1 7 -095 B 1 7 - 0 0 3 B17 - 0 4 7 B17 -081 B17-049 B17-005B 1 6-013 B28-001B17 -031 B 1 7 - 0 4 5 B16-009 B17-037 B17-027B18-009 B18-011 B 17-0 09 B17-007B17-029B17-015B17-041B17-093 B17-023B17-065B17-055B17-069B1 7-01 9 B16-015B17-043B17-067 B17-0 7 7 B28-003B16-017B17-021 B 17-03 3 B1 7 -0 53 B17-059 B 1 7-01 3 B1 7-057 B16-007B17-051 B17 -0 11 B17-039B17-079 B17-0 35B B17-001 B 17-073 B17-071 B17-0 35A B17-025 B16 -003 B1 7-0 75 B16-019B17 MAP 45 MAP 46 MAP 47 MAP 56 MAP 57 MAP 58 MAP 67 MAP 68 MAP 69 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 57 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 373 HAILEY COURT MEARNSAVENUEHAI NES STREETB17-001 B17 MAP 46 MAP 47 MAP 57 MAP 58 MAP 68 MAP 69 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 58 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 374 HAMMOND STREETSHADY LANECRESCENTMAPLE GROVE ROADB 51-067 B48-2 29 B 51-065B48-235B51-061B48-233 MAP 48 MAP 49 MAP 59 MAP 60 MAP 70 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 59 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 375 DYKSTRA LANEBONATHONCRESCENTKI NG GEORGE WAY KING GEORG E W A Y CL AR ING TON BOULEV A R DGREEN ROADOXLEYCO URTWE L D R I C K C R E S C E N T CONNELL LANEPRINCE WILLIAM BOULEV A R D BO S W E L L DRI V E COL L IER L ANEPADFIELD DRIVEHAMMOND STREETSHADY LANECRESCENTB51-063B50-121 B48-370 B51-045B51-017 B 5 1 - 005 B48 - 2 3 1 B48-3 65B48-271B48-225 B4 8-371B48-219AB48-211B51-021 B48 - 1 9 5B48-275B48-207B48-199 B 5 1 - 0 1 5 B48-201 B 51 - 0 0 3B51-053B51-011B51-033B51-071B48-209B 4 8 - 2 2 3 B51-029B 48-229 B5 1-0 31B51-069B48 - 2 2 1 B48-227B 48-197 B51-043B48-281B48-295B 5 1-065 B48-2 05 B50-12 3B51-013B51-047BB48-191B48-203B 5 1 - 0 3 5 BB48-287 B51-0 3 5AB48-277B48-213B48-235 B 5 1- 0 4 7 A B48-289B48 - 2 17BB48-297B48-273B50-119B51-027B51-007B 5 1 - 0 2 5 B51-009B 51 - 0 0 1 B 5 1 - 0 2 3 B51-019B51-051B51-061B51 -041 B5 1-067 B48 - 2 1 5 B 5 1 - 0 5 7 B 5 1 - 0 3 9B51-059B48-279B48-233B48-285B 5 1 - 0 3 7 B51-049B48-283B 5 1 -0 5 5 B48-193 MAP 48 MAP 49 MAP 50 MAP 59 MAP 60 MAP 61 MAP 70 MAP 71 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 60 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 376 GREENROADGREEN ROADDYKSTRA LANEKING WILLIAM WAYAU TUMN HA RVEST ASPE N SPRIN G S D R I V EKING GEORGE WAYASPENSPRINGSDRIVEGREENROADKING G EORGE W A Y KING GE O R G E W A Y KI NG WI LLI AM WAY KIN GGEORGEWAYKINGWILLIAMWAYKINGGEORGEWAY KI NG GEORGE WAYQUEEN ALEXANDRA LANEKING W ILLIAM WA YCLARIN G T O N B O U L E V ARD GREEN ROADPRINCE WILLIAM BOULEV A R D LORD ELGIN LANECONNELL LANELANDERVILLE LANESIDNEY LANEWEST S ID E DR IVE BAXTER STREETB48-025B48-364 B 4 8 -366 B50-1 2 1 B48-370 B48-368B48-3 65 B48-367B4 8-371 B48-3 09 B48-369 B48-195 B4 8-013B48-065B48- 0 0 5 B4 8-015 B48-199 B 4 8-055B48-069B51-011B48-307B48-18 1B48-189 B 4 8 -00 3 B49-055 B48-19 7 B48-023B50-12 3 B4 8 - 0 0 9B51-013B48-021B48-203B48-287B48-067B48-313B50-119B 4 8 - 0 6 1 B 4 8 - 0 6 3 B48-057B48-011B48-311B48-285B48-183B48-283B48-191B48-1 8 5B48-187B48-193 B 4 8 -0 5 9 B48-007B48-019 MAP 49 MAP 50 MAP 51 MAP 60 MAP 61 MAP 62 MAP 70 MAP 71 MAP 72 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 61 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 377 BOWMANVILLE AVENUEWEST S IDE DR IVE B O N N Y C A S T L E D R I V E GLEN RAY COUR T HART WELL AVENU E ASP E N S PR IN GS D R IVE LANDERVILLE LANEFRYCRESCENTVA I L M E A D O W S C R E S C E N T B48-025B48 - 0 39 B4 8 - 1 8 1 B48-043B48-127B48-029B48- 1 5 5B48-157B48-141B48-151B48-137B48-123B48- 0 0 5 B48 -177 B48-171B4 8 - 0 15 B 4 8-055 B 4 8 - 0 6 1 B48-163B 48-031 B 48 - 0 4 7 B48 -161B48-167B48-133 B4 8-175B48-035B48-165B48-1 7 9 B49-055B 4 8 - 1 0 9 B48-00 3B48-023B 4 8 -12 5 B48-145 B4 8 - 1 6 0B4 8 - 0 0 9 B49-053 B 4 8-149 B48-115 B48-021 B48-049B48-113B48-037B48-0 0 1 A B48-17 3B48-053 B48-169 B48-041 B48-143B48-11 7 B48-131B48-027B48-045B48-111B 4 8 -139 B 48-001CB48-057B48-011B48-119B 4 8-1 35 B48-147B48-107B48-15 3 B48-129B48-121 B48-159 B48-0 5 1 B 4 8 -0 5 9 B48-007B48-019B48-001BB48 MAP 50 MAP 51 MAP 52 MAP 61 MAP 62 MAP 63 MAP 71 MAP 72 MAP 73 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 62 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 378 BONNYCASTLEDRIVE MARTINROAD WAVERLEY ROADROSALYNNEAVENUED OREEN C RES C E NT LAWRE N C E GATE CA NDLER CO URT HART W ELL AV ENUE RHONDA BOULEVARDPRESTONWAY DRIVE ALO NNA STR EET ROSALYNNE AVENUEDOR EEN CRESCE NT B OWMA N V I L L E A V E N U EB48-127B48-123B03-061B48-177 B39-015 B03-06 7 B48-163B01-047 B48-161B0 2 - 0 4 9B48-167B39-019B48-165B48-1 7 9 B48-115 B39-017B 4 8 -12 5 B4 8 - 1 6 0 B 02-043 B01-049B48-121B03-071B03-127 B0 2 -047 B01-045B48-171B03-027 B02-089 B39-023B39-021B39-025 B02-0 87 B48-17 3 B02-057B03-069 B48-169 B02 - 0 4 5 B02-055 B0 2-0 8 5A B02-0 83 B02-051 B 02-053B02-079B02-091B 02-08 1 B02-077B 0 2 - 0 8 5 B B01-0 43 B48 -1 75B48-129B02-093B03-065MAP 51 MAP 52 MAP 53 MAP 62 MAP 63 MAP 64 MAP 72 MAP 73 MAP 74 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 63 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 379 SP RY AVE N U E LOSCOMBEDRIVEROSALYNNEAVENUE PARKL A N E C IRCLE THE BRIDL E P A T H WAVERLEY ROAD T H E B R I D L E P A T H QUINN D R I V E ROSA LY N NE AVE NUE HET H E RIN G T O N DRI V E ROSALYNNEAVENUE CARRU T H E R S DRIVERHONDABOULEVARD LAWRENCE CRESCENTHOLGATE CRESCENTBO W MA N V I L L E A V E NUE HILL IERSTREET B03-001B02-051 B0 2 -029B03-061B03 - 0 05 B03-06 7 B01- 0 47 B0 3 - 0 2 5 B03-007 B02-03 7 B0 2 - 047 B02-073B02-041B0 2-081 B0 2 - 0 2 7 B02-0 35 B03-015 B03-009 B03-069 B03-003B03-185 B02-065B01-049B02-063B02-043 B03 - 0 1 7 B03-019 B02-033B03-013B 02-101 B03-027 B02-023 B02 - 0 4 5 B03- 011 B02-055B02-069B03 - 1 8 9 B02-057 B 02-053 B 0 2 - 0 3 9B02-079B02-077B02 -099B02-095B02-031 B0 2 -02 5 B03-183B02-02 1B02-071B03 - 0 2 3 B02-097B03-1 8 7B03-193 B03-021 B02-067B03-179B03-181B02-093B02-059B02-061B02-075B03-191B03-065MAP 52 MAP 53 MAP 54 MAP 63 MAP 64 MAP 65 MAP 73 MAP 74 MAP 75 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 64 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 380 LO S CO MBE D RIVELAWRENCECRESCENTSPRY AVENU E PARKLA N E C I RCLE THE BRID L E PATH NELSONSTREE T ALBE R T STRE E T PARKLANE CIRCLEHILL IERSTREET THE B R I D L E P A T H CA RR UTH E R S DR IVE B03 - 011 B 80-00 1 B02-001B02-013 B03 -005 B03-00 7 B03-001B 8 0 - 0 0 9 B0 2-0 0 7 B03- 0 0 9 B03-003B 8 0 - 0 1 1 B03-185 B80-003B80 - 0 0 5 B02-025 B 02-00 3B02-063B80-007B02-069B32-003 B8 0 - 0 2 1 B 8 0 - 0 2 3 B02-103 B0 2 -107 B80-0 0 5 b B02-02 1 B02-009 B02 -099B02-095B03-183B02-105B02-097B02-1 01B02-067 B02 -011B03-179B03-181B0 2-005 B32-00 1 B03 B02 B32 MAP 53 MAP 54 MAP 55 MAP 64 MAP 65 MAP 66 MAP 74 MAP 75 MAP 76 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 65 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 381 PA RK DRIV E AN N STRE E T P IN E STR EET D U K E S T R E E T ALBE R T S T R E ET O N T A R I O S T R E E T NELSON STREETVICTORIA STREETH U N T S T R E E TB31-035B80-003 B31 -015 B 1 4- 0 8 3 B3 1-007 B31 -021B31-033B80-025 B3 1-0 01B31-047B8 0 -017 B31-009B31-013B8 0 - 0 0 9 B80-029B 31-023 B 3 1 - 0 2 7 B31-017B80-015 B 8 0 - 0 1 3 B 3 1 - 0 4 3 B8 0 - 0 0 5 B31-055 B31-065 B80-019 B 3 1 -0 3 7B31-045B 3 1 -0 3 9B80-007B31-011 B 3 1 -0 2 9 B 3 1- 0 3 1 B 3 1 - 0 4 1 B8 0 - 0 2 1 B 8 0 - 0 2 3 B31-019 B 1 4-0 7 9 B80 -0 2 7 B31-025B80-005b B31-003 B 8 0- 0 1 1 B 1 4-0 8 7 B30 B31 B80 MAP 54 MAP 55 MAP 56 MAP 65 MAP 66 MAP 67 MAP 75 MAP 76 MAP 77 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 66 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 382 B ASE L INE RO AD W EST MUTTONCOURTPARK W A Y CRESC E N T ANN S T RE E T ORCHARDVIEWBOULEVARD FLETT STREETHI GHWAY 401HIGHWA Y 401NELSON STREETHUNTSTREETB ASEL I NE RO AD EAS T SOUTH W A Y D RI V E P ARK WAY AVE N U E D U K E S T R E E T PINE STREE T PARK D RIVE LIBE RTY STREET SOUTHW H A R F S TR E E T SI MPSON AVENUE O N T A R I O S T R E E T PA RKWAY A V E N U EB14-043B14-017B14-033 B16-011 B 3 1 - 0 2 7 B14-009B73-001B74-001B31-015 B 1 4 - 0 8 3 B31-007 B14 -01 1 B1 4 - 0 3 7 B 7 4 -0 0 5 B31-021 B14-021B 14-003B31-059 B31-001 B31-067B14-023B14-107B31-009B74-003B31-013B16-015B 31-0 23 B16-013 B31-017B14-111B31-061B31-055 B 1 4 - 0 2 7 B31-057B1 4 - 0 3 9 B14-103 B 1 4 - 0 7 9 B14-095 B1 4 -0 97 B31-011B14-025B31-063B14-045B31-019 B 1 4-0 2 9 B14-041 B14 -007B14-093B31-025 B31-00 3 B14-03 5 B14-105 B14-109 B 1 4 - 0 8 7 B1 4 -0 99 B3 1-065 B14-091B1 4-0 05B14-015B14-013B14-031B 14-101 B31 B74 MAP 55 MAP 56 MAP 66 MAP 67 MAP 68 MAP 76 MAP 77 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 67 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 383 SIMPSON AVENUE BA SELINE R O AD EAS TMUTTONCOURTORCHARDVIEWBOULEVARDSOUTH W A Y D RI V E SOPER C O U R T PARK W AY A VENU E W H A R F S T R E E T PARKWAY CRESCENTSIMPSON AVENUEB3 5 - 0 0 1 B16-0 0 5 B16-011B74-001B 7 4 -0 0 5 B14-097 B14-099 B73 - 003 B 3 5 -00 9 B35-003 B14-001B74-003B16-015B16-013 B35 -0 11 B16-009 B28-001B35-005 B28- 0 0 3 B73-0 01 B14-101 B14-003 B14-105 B16-003 B35-00 7B16-001 B1 4-0 05 B14-103 B16-007B28 B16 B35 B14 B73 B74 MAP 56 MAP 57 MAP 58 MAP 67 MAP 68 MAP 69 MAP 77 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 68 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 384 BASELI N E R O AD E AST HIGHWAY 401 TR UCK INSPECTI ON A CC ESSMEARNS COURTCARISTRAP STREET HIGHWAY 40 1MEARNS AVENUEB 3 5 -00 9 B3 5-011 B35-0 07 B35-01 5 B3 5-013 MAP 57 MAP 58 MAP 68 MAP 69 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 69 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 385 DYKSTRA LANEMCB RI DE AVE N UE WOO LAC OTT LA NEPADFIELDDRIVE CONNELLLANEA UTUMN H A RVEST BUTTONSHAWSTREETBUXTON LANE MCPHAIL AVENUEB50 - 1 2 1 B50-145B48-321b B50-1 5 3 B50-159 B 50-13 7B51-049B 5 1 - 0 4 7 A B50-151B50-155B50-12 3 B50-117B 50-139 B5 0 - 1 5 7 B 5 1 - 0 0 1 B50-149 B50-14 7 B50-143B50-157bB50-141B51-051B50-119B50-115 MAP 59 MAP 60 MAP 61 MAP 70 MAP 71 MAP 78 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 70 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 386 DYKSTRA LANEDODDSSQUAREG R E E N R O A D MCB RIDE AVENUE GREEN ROADGREEN ROADGREENROADWEST S IDEDRIVE A UTUMN H A R V E S T REM MINGTON S T R E ET BOTTRELL STREETSIDNEY LANESHACKELTON STREETBUTTONSHAWSTREETCLANCY LANEHIG G O N STREETCONNELL LANEFARMSTEADDRIVE RE MMING TON S TREET MC PHAIL A VE N UE KIM BLE AV EN UEWOOLACOTT LANEBAXTER STREETBUXTONLANEBUTSON CRESCENTBAGNELL CRESCENTB50-11 1 B50- 1 2 1 B50-105B50-145B49-049B50-10 1 B50-135B50-169B50-15 3 B48-007B48-391B 5 0 -029 B49 -057 B50-161B48-311 B50 -06 3 B50-179 B50-059 B 5 0 -025 B48-003 B 50-13 7 B50-173B50-177 B50-129 B 50-171 B50-165 B50-12 3 B50-163B 48-321b B50-027B50-117B4 8 -397 B49-045B 50-139 B4 8-319 B50-14 7 B50-143B50-179AB48-393B50-103 B 50-053 B50-175 B48 -3 21 B50-0 61B50-141B50-133 b B48-39 5 B48-317B48-315B50-133B 50-127b B49-055 B 50-125B48-313B50-071B50-095B50-127B50-093B50 -1 31 B50-097B50-119 B5 0-055 B50-057B50-113B50-115B 50-099 MAP 60 MAP 61 MAP 62 MAP 70 MAP 71 MAP 72 MAP 78 MAP 79 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 71 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 387 BAGNE L L CRESCE N T BA SELINE ROAD REMMIN G T O N STREET BAGNE L L C R ES C ENT BOTTRE L L ST R E ET BANNISTER STREETDODDS SQUAR E WOOL NER LA N ECLANCY LANEHIGG O N STREET BAXTER STREETPENFOUNDDRIVEDODDSSQUAREBRODI E COUR T BOT TRE LL S TR E ET MILLB URN DRIV EWEST S I DE DRIVE ABERNETHY CRESCENT B50-081 B50-0 1 9 B49-025BB50-079B50-035BB49-049B49-013B49-019B49-04 0 B49-031 B61-003B 49-001 B50-003B48-007 B50-069 B49 -057 B49-00 3B49-035B50-059 B39-0 09 B 5 0 -025 B 50-037 B50 -0 83 B 5 0-021 B49-025AB 49 -0 2 3 B 5 0 - 0 4 1 B 50-039B50-093 B50-063 B50-0 05 B48-003 B 50-0 07 B50-047 B50-075 B50-165 B49-03 7 B50-0 23 B50-011 B50-163 B49-051 B50-027 B 50-0 73B50-031B50-043B50-065B50-049B50-067B50-009B49-015B61-001AB49-017B49-041B50-061 B49-027B50-015B 4 9-0 4 3 B49-0 5 3 B61-001 B50-013 B50-029 B7 1-0 05 B50-085 B50-0 53 B49-021 B4 9-009 B50-07 7B49-055B4 9-03 3 B50-055 B39-011B50-071 B50-001B50-035AB50-051B4 9 - 0 0 7 B50-045B49-03 9B49-045B50-057 B50-033B49-005B50-017B50 B49 B61 MAP 61 MAP 62 MAP 63 MAP 71 MAP 72 MAP 73 MAP 78 MAP 79 MAP 80 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 72 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 388 SQUIRE S G A T E D R I V E MARTIN ROADSPICER S Q UAREROSER CRESCENTROSER CRESC ENT WALBRIDG ECOURTBASEL I N E R O A D BASELI N E ROAD W E STALONNA STREETWEST S IDEDRIVE PE N FO U ND DRI V E B50-081B4 9 - 0 0 7 B5 0-0 07 B0 1 - 0 1 1 B61-003B49-0 01 B 7 2-001B39-001B0 1 - 0 0 5 B49-00 3 B01- 0 4 7 B01 -035 B50-005 B39-019B39-017B 71-001 B0 1 - 0 1 7 B01-007B01-045B01-057B01-009B61-001AB39-005B 72-005 B39-003 B7 2-0 03B01-041B 72-007 B01-015 B61-001 B39-007B71-0 03 B39-0 09 B7 1-0 05 B50-001 B 0 1-051B39-011B01-037B01-019B01-033B01-023B01-039B01-013B01-021B01-043 B01-049B01-003B01-001B49-005B39 -0 13 B39-015 B39 B50 B49 B61 B72 B71 B01 MAP 62 MAP 63 MAP 64 MAP 72 MAP 73 MAP 74 MAP 79 MAP 80 MAP 81 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 73 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 389 BOWMANVIL LE AVENUEWAVERLEY ROADRO SER CR ESCENT JOHNSCOTTCOURTMARTIN ROAD HIGH WAY 4 01 SP ICER SQ U A R E HIGHWA Y 401 LOSCO M BE DRI VE SPICE RSQUARESPIC ER SQUARER OSER C R E SCENT CARRU T H E R S DRIVE ALONNA STREETHIGHWAY 401B A SELINE R O A D WES T B30-029B75-0 19 B02-029 B7 5 - 0 1 5B01 - 0 1 1 B30-049B75-009B30-025 B3 0-0 39 B01 - 0 3 1 B02-033B 7 5 - 0 1 3 B 3 0-045 B 3 0-047B0 2 - 0 2 7 B01-007B01-037 B 72-007 B30-031B01-025B02-019B02-101 B01-057B01-009B75 -007 B75-0 05 B75 -0 21 B30-023B0 2-0 17 B75-011B01-055 B75-023B02-031 B30-053B30-051 B02-0 15 B 0 1-051 B01-003 B 3 0-027 B02-021 B01-033B01-023B02-023B 0 1 - 0 2 9 B01-021B75-017B 01-053B01-049 B30-04 3 B01-001B 0 1 - 0 2 7 B01 MAP 63 MAP 64 MAP 65 MAP 73 MAP 74 MAP 75 MAP 80 MAP 81 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 74 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 390 BOWMANVILLE AVENUEJOHNSCOTTCOURTSPRY AVENUE J OHN SCO TT AVENU E CARRUTHERSDRIVE LOCKHART GATE B A SE L IN E R OAD WE S T H IG H WA Y 401 CARRU T H E R S DRIVE HIGHW A Y 4 0 1HIGHWAY 401L O SCO MBE DR I V E HIGHWA Y 4 0 1 HIG HWAY 4 0 1 H IGH W AY 401B30-029B3 0 -03 3 B30-031B02-105B30-021B3 0-009 B02-017 B30-035 B30-01 7B02-009 B30-027 B02-021 B30-023B02-013 B30 -025 B0 2-0 15 B30-015B02-101 B02-011 B30-019 B30-011 B30-04 3 B3 0 -0 39 B30-037 MAP 64 MAP 65 MAP 66 MAP 74 MAP 75 MAP 76 MAP 81 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 75 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 391 B ASE LINE ROAD W E ST HIGH WAY 40 1 HIGHW A Y 40 1 H IGH WAY 40 1 HIGHW A Y 40 1 HIG HWAY 4 01 B31-007 B31-001 B30-0 0 1 B31-009B31-011B30-003 B30 -005 B30-011 B31-003 B30 -0 0 7 B30-009 B30 B31 MAP 65 MAP 66 MAP 67 MAP 75 MAP 76 MAP 77 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 76 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 392 BASELI N E R O A D W E S T HIGHW A Y 401 LIBERT Y STREET SOUTHLAKE RO AD DUKE STREETWEST B E A C H R O A DHIGHWAY 401HIGHW AY 401H IGHWA Y 401 H IG HW A Y 40 1 B31-007 B31-001 B31-009B31-011B31-003 B31 MAP 66 MAP 67 MAP 68 MAP 76 MAP 77 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 77 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 393 BASE L INE R O A D MCPHAI L A V E N U E DODDS SQUAREGREEN ROADB50-063 B 5 0 -0 89B50-163B50-165B50-071B50 -091 MAP 70 MAP 71 MAP 72 MAP 78 MAP 79 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 78 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 394 WESTSIDEDRIVE H IGHW A Y 401BASELINE R O A D GREEN ROADMILLBUR NDRIVE DODDS SQ U A R E B50-081B50-079B50-003B50-069B50-065B50-083 B50-063 B50-075B50-163 B50-073B50-165B50-067B50-013 B71-005 B50-017B50-077 B50-071 B50-001 B50-0 89 B 50-091 B50-085 B50-087 B50 MAP 71 MAP 72 MAP 73 MAP 78 MAP 79 MAP 80 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 79 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 395 MARTIN ROADHIG HW A Y 401 SPICER SQUAR E BASELIN E ROAD HIG H WA Y 401HI GHW A Y 401E N ER G Y D RI VE H IGHW A Y 401B50-081B01-057B71-005 B50-001 B50 B01 MAP 72 MAP 73 MAP 74 MAP 79 MAP 80 MAP 81 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 80 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 396 ENER G Y DRI V EMARTIN ROADSPICER S Q U A R E HIGH W A Y 401BOWMANVILLE AVENUE HIGH WAY 401 HIGH W A Y 401HIGH W A Y 4 01 SPICER SQUAR E HIGH W A Y 401 HIGH W AY 401B76-003 B76 -00 1 B75-001B7 5 - 0 1 5 B75-009B75-011B01-057B75-007 B75-005 B75-003B75-017B01 B75 B76 MAP 73 MAP 74 MAP 75 MAP 80 MAP 81 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 81 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 397 YA CH T D RIV E PORT DARL IN GT ON ROA D LARKIN LANEE A ST B EA CH ROA D CRYDERMAN LANEEA ST SHORE DRIVE B81-001B 81-011 B8 1-0 07B81-009B81-005 B81-003B81-015B81 -01 3 B81 MAP 82 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Meters 1:2,000 5849 12 67 3 11 6460 69676561 7470 4238 22 777571 47454339 2523 31 81 5349 13 17 19 32 34 36 50 54 56 58 78 12 16 28 62 68666359 46 26 767372 44414037 242120 10 57 35 828079 55525148 33302927 181514 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Storm Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 82 of 82 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Bowmanville This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 398 APPENDIX B – MAP BOOK FOR BURKETON Page 399 C ON CESS I O N R OA D 10 O L D S C U G O G R O A D HAWKE COURT D A R L I N G T O N S T R E E T SUMAC ROADD01 D0 1 - 0 0 1 MAP 1 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Burketon 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 D01 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 1 of 1 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 400 APPENDIX C – MAP BOOK FOR COURTICE Page 401 C13-125bC02-175C02-159C49-057C49-051C1 3 - 1 2 9 C 13 -143 C02-169C02-167C02-157C13-139C 49-053 C02-171 C49-04 3 C0 2 -173 C49-055C13-123C 13 -1 27 C49-047 C13-125 C49-045 C13-141VIV IAN DR IVE MA L LO RY STR E E T ADELAI D E A V ENUE TRULLS ROAD MAP 1 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 1 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 402 C40-165C40-129C40-161C40-1 4 9 C40-135 C40-13 1 C40-133C40-1 37 C40-145 C40-139C40-143C40-147C40-151 C40-163 C40-127C40-155 C40-153C40-159 C40 -157 C40 -141 C40-1 67 HOL YROD DRIVE ELMER ADAMS DRIVEGORDONCOWLING STREETARTHUR TREWI N STREETCOURTICE ROADMAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 2 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 403 C40-129C40-117C40-113C40-161C 4 0 - 1 2 3 C40-135 C 4 0 - 0 6 5 C40-053C40-07 1 C40-163 C40-087C40-115 C40-105C40-099C40-133C40 -13 7 C40-139C 40 -06 7 C40-061C 40-06 9 C 4 0-107 C40-101 C40-057C40-109C40-141 C 4 0 - 0 6 3 C40-131 C 4 0 - 0 9 5C40-111C40-127C40-103C40-153C40-159 C4 0-073C40-125C40-059C40-121C 4 0 - 0 9 7 GE O RGE REYNO L D S D R IV E HOL YROD DRIVE ELMER A D AMS DRI VEARTHURTREWINSTREET E LMER A D A M S DRIVE H A R R Y G A Y D R I V EGORDON COWLI NG STREET MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 3 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 404 C40-0 7 9 C 4 0 - 0 6 5 C40-053C40-07 1 C40-087C40-061C 4 0 - 0 6 3 C 40 -06 7 C 40-06 9 C40-057C40 -0 77 C4 0-073 C40-07 5 H A R R Y G A Y D R I V E HANCOCK ROADGEO R GE R EYNOL D S D RIVE MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 12 MAP 13 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 4 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 405 C26 C10-151 C26-005 C 1 0 - 147C10-149 C26-001 C26-003 MA HA F F Y P L A CE TOWNLINE ROAD NORTH LAW SON ROAD OLD VARCOE ROAD MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 14 MAP 15 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 5 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 406 C26 C10-1 4 3 C10-151 C10-137C1 0 - 1 4 1 C26-001 C10-1 3 9 C10-131C10-135C10 - 1 3 3 C10-145 C10-127C10-063 C 1 0 - 1 4 7C10-149C10-129VARCOE ROADM A H A F F Y P L A C EOLD VARCOE ROAD MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 6 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 407 C49 C50 C02-04 1C50-007C50 - 0 0 1 C49-0 0 1 C 5 0 - 005 C50-003C20-027C20-023C20-025SPRING FIELDLANEISLAY COURT MCLEA N R O AD TOOLEY ROAD MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 7 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 408 C49 C50 C02-111C02-039BC 0 2-12 3 C4 9-0 59 C02-06 9AC49-035C02-071C50-007C50 -001 C49-027 C 02-139 C02-053 C17-043C4 9 - 0 0 3 C02-033C49-033 C 5 0 - 0 1 5 C49-013C49-017C17-031C02 - 0 5 1 C02-049C49-0 01C02 -057C 5 0 - 005 C49-011 C49-01 5 C49-019 C02-055C49-025C5 0 - 0 0 9 C02-131C02-047C49-057C02-127 C02-125C02-0 43 C02-129C17-055C 0 2-1 35 C02-115 C02-149C02-137 C02-06 1 C02 -05 9 C02-063 C02-13 3 C50-003C49-039 C49-029C50-023C02-069BC01-082C49-043 C02-0 37 C 49-023C50-021C02-039AC02-04 1 C02-075C02-045C17-033C 02-11 3 C49-061C02-109C 50-0 1 7 C49-02 1 C02-035C50-011 C50-0 19 C17-05 3 C02 -10 7 C49-045 C49-0 37 C50-013C49-031C02 -1 05 C02 -065 C02-151 C 02-073 C02 -0 67 C 4 9 -00 7 GEORGE REYNOLDS DRIVEDAISEYFIEL DAVENUE MA LL O RY S TRE E T PAG E PLAC E ADELAI D E A V E N U E KI NTYRE S TRE E TJURA COURT VETZAL COURTFIRWOODAVENUE MULL CRESCENTNIDDERY STREETISL AY C OURT FIRWOOD AVENUEARRAN COURTDUNKIN A VENUE MAP 1 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 8 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 409 C17 C17-051 C13-088C02-155C02-175 C 13-1 05C13-121C02-159C49-0 59 C02-069A C02-063 C02-071C1 7-0 15 C13-131C49-051C17-011C49-071C01-063C01 -065C02-12 7 C01-047C17-045 C17-019C02-167C17-039C17-031C02-06 7 C49-053 C1 7-049C02-171 C17-007C02-131C49-057C02-125C49-07 3 C02-173 C49-055C02-129C17-055C01-081C17-023C 0 2-1 35 C1 7 -005C02-169C02-149C02-165 C02-145C02-137C13-125 C13-119 C 1 7-0 3 7 C49-043 C49-067 C17-003 C13-117C17-029C17-041C17-027C02-133 C02-163C17-025 C01-067C17-043C17-013C0 2-0 73 C13-141C17-017 C02-069BC01-0 71 C 01-077B C17-00 9 C13-133C01-041 C17-001C13-0 9 7 C49-047 C02-161 C02-075C17-033C 0 1-039C49-061C01-075C02-157C01-079 C0 2-1 47C02-153 C49-063 C17-0 47 C17-035 C 0 1-077A C0 1-073C01-082C17-05 3 C02-143 C0 2 -1 39 C01-069C13-123C02-151 C49-045 C13-139C13-107C13-109C13-093FIRWOOD AVENUED E VON D ALE ST R E E T G O L D P IN E A V E N U E ADELAI D E A V E N U E DUN KIN AVEN UE GEOR GEREYNOLDS DRIVE AUDREYCOURTDAISE YFIE L D A VENU E KINTYRE STREETLONGWOOD COURTVIV IAN DRIVE TRULLS ROADMALLORY STREETBROADLANDS CRESCENT MAP 1 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 9 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 410 C17 C39 C01 C45 C46 C39-003C13-073C 13-1 05 C13-111C13-077C13-119 C33-011C39-033 C45-005C39-031C13-088C 45-007 C39-007 C13-08 5 C45-001C01-063C13-083 C13-081C13-133C13-101C13-075C39-039 C3 3 -019 C 39-011 C 39-049 C 39-045 C46 -001 C39-043 C39-005 C 1 7-025 C13-091C39-009C39-051C17-023C17-001C39-027C39-033BC39-047C13-07 9 C33-009C33-017 C33 -013 C33-015 C39-041 C13-0 9 7 C39-025C13-103 C39-03 5 C39-029 C01-0 73 C13 -071 C13-089BC13-099C13-095C13-107C13-109C13-093DEV ON DA LE STREE T LONGW O O D C OURT LONGWOODCOURTGEOR GE REY N O L D S DR IVE CECIL FOUND CRESCENTVIV IAN DR IVE BELLMAN COURT 4T H AVEN UETRULLS ROADMEREDITH COURTSLEEMANSQUAREPIDDUC K STREETSL EEM A N S QU ARE RICHFIE L D SQUARE MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 10 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 411 C39 C01 C45C46 C39-003C 4 5-0 4 3 C39-053 C39-015Plug20 C45-02 1 C13-059C39-033 C45-005C39-031C45-033C45-035C39-007C45-001Plug21 C39-019C45-041 C39-017C39-041 C45-015 C45-031 C 40 -17 5 C39-0 2 3 C45-017C45-023C39-021C46 -001 C45-011C39-005 C39-009 C 4 5 -03 7 C45 -013 C39-0 13 C13-043C39-027C39-033BC45-039C13-06 1 C4 5-025 C1 3-039 C1 3-05 5C39-057 C 13-05 7 C4 5 -027 C13-045 C39-035 C45-029 C13 -0 41 C39-011 C4 5-019 C39-025 C39-029 C45 -007 C45-009JANE AVENUERICHFIELD SQUAREWES TM ORE S T REE T GLENVI E W RO A D COURTI CE ROADS K IN NER CO U R T GEORGE REYNOLDS DRIVE LYNWOOD AVENUESLEEM A N S Q U A RE 4 TH AVEN UE MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 11 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 412 C40B C40A C 4 0 - 0 1 7 C40-173C25-023C13-059C45-033 C40-055 C45-035C40- 0 0 9 C25-047 C4 0 - 0 05 C4 0-023 C1 3-057 C40-019C1 3-061 C25-043C40-013C40-17 5 C40-011C40-051C4 0 - 0 5 9 C25-045C40-049 C 40 -007 C40-053C 4 0-0 21 SKINNE R COURT MOULTONCOURTWESTM ORE ST R E E T FEWSTERSTREETCOURTI CE ROADLYNWOOD AVENUE N A SH ROA D HARRY GAY DRIVE MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 20 MAP 21 MAP 22 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 12 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 413 C40-089C25-02 7C25-023C40-091C25-047 C40-03 3 C4 0-043 C25-019 C2 5-025 C40-031C40-057C40-035C25-021C40-041C 40-0 2 7 C40-029C40-051 C 4 0 - 0 5 9 C40-047 C 40-03 7C40-049C40-045C40-053C4 0-021 C40-093C4 0-02 3 BRO OM E A VEN UE TA BB AVE NU E WILBER T HOAR C O U R T FEWSTER STREETHARRY GAY DRIVE DUVAL STREETSIMNICKCRESCENTN ASH RO A D HANCOCK ROADMAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 21 MAP 22 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 13 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 414 C26 C27 C 2 7 - 0 0 1 C27 -007C27-017C27-025 C 2 7 - 0 0 5 C 2 6-009 C27-015 C26-001 C27-009C27-02 1 C27-019C27-023 C27-01 3 C26-005 C26-003 C26-0 0 7 TOWNLINE ROAD NORTHLIG HTHEARTDRIVE E L D ORAD O AVENU E ADELAI D E AVENUE E A S T BELAIR CRESCENTSHECOCOURTW ABB O K ISH COUR T SHAN KE L ROAD OLD VARCOE ROAD LAWSO N R O A D MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 23 MAP 24 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 14 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 415 C26 C10-051C10-087C10-125C11-037C10- 0 9 1 C 1 0-03 3C10-109C10-043 C10 -079 C10-053C26-001 C10-077C10-041C10-067C10 -039C10-129C 11 -039 C10-065 C10-037C10-095C10-093C10-061C10-035 C10-073 C 1 0 -02 9 C10-071B C10 -02 7C10-101C11-035C10-127C10-071A C 1 0-049 C10-0 89 C 1 0 - 0 5 9 C10-081C10-097C 10-103C10-099C11-045C10-045C10-05 5 C11-047 C10-10 7 C10-057C10-069C 1 0 - 1 0 5 C10-025C10-085C10-075BIR CHFIELD DR IVE CENTERFIELD DRIVE CIRCLE FI ELD COURT HOMEFI ELDSQUARESPRINGFIELD LANEHARTSFIELD DRIVEO AKFIEL D G A T E CLOVERFIELDSTREETBIRCHFIELD COURTVARCOE ROADOLD VARCOE ROADHOMEFIELD SQUAREMAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 23 MAP 24 MAP 25 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 15 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 416 C 2 0 -0 0 5C10-051C11-041C11-037C11-015C10-043 C10-053C10-047C 11 - 0 1 7 C10-041 C 10-0 39 C10-0 49 C11-0 2 9C11-027C10-063 C10-037 C10-061C20-011C20-013 C11-0 39 C11-035 C11-03 1 C11-019C11-043C20-015C 1 0 - 0 5 9 C20-009C11-045C20-019 C10-05 5 C1 1-005C11-023C11-025C11-047C10-057C11-021C20-021C20-017C20-023NASH ROAD C L OVERF IEL D STREET CIRCLE FI E LD COURT VALLEYCRESTDRIVE POPPY FI ELD DRI VE WAS H BURN PATHCENTERFIELD DR IVE B IRC H F IELD DRIVEHOMEFIELD SQUARESPRINGFIELD LANESPRYFIEL D TRAIL WA SHB URN PA TH HOMEFI E L D S QUARE CLOVERFIELDSTREETTOOLEY ROAD MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 24 MAP 25 MAP 26 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 16 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 417 C07 C03 C20 C11 C15 C02 C42 C41 C20-00 7 C15-0 01 C03-003C03-00 7C42-001C11-001 C 2 0 -0 0 5 C41-001C02 - 009 C02-01 9 C 02 -013 C 03-013 C02-005C02-027C 20-001C 0 2 - 0 2 1 C 0 2 - 0 2 5 C02-121C07-001C02-007C20-011C02-101C 02-003C20-017C20-013C03-009C03-019C02-077C02-023 C02-119C02-097C02-035C0 3 - 0 0 1C02-033C02-029C02-001C20-015 C20-003C20-009C0 2 - 0 1 7 C02-0 11 C0 2-103BC03 -0 05 C15-00 5 C02-081 C 0 2 - 0 9 9 C 0 2 -1 1 7 C 0 2 -0 3 1 C02-093C02-073 C1 1-005 C02 -103 A C02-105 C1 5-00 3 C 0 2 - 0 9 5C02-039AC11-0 03 BLACKCREEK TRAIL OBA N COURT VALLEYCRESTDRIVE L EITH COU RT WASHB URN PATH WASHBURN PATHG E O R G E R E Y N O L D S D R I V E ROWLANDCOURTWI NDSORVALLEYPLACEM C L E L L A N C O U R T KI NTYRE STREETDUNKIN A V E N U E DE V ONDAL E STREE T MC L ELLAN DR I VE TOOLEYROADMULL CRESCENTNASH R OAD MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 25 MAP 26 MAP 27 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 17 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 418 C02 C03 -00 7 C03-0 11 C02-079C01-033 C 01-065C01-075C01-025 C 0 1 - 0 4 3 C02-005 C01-021 C01-04 9 C01-019C01-047C03-019C02-087C02-083 C0 2-089C01-005 C03 -015 C01-063C01-027 C02-007 C01-05 5C01-067C 0 2 -0 03 C15 -003 C03-009C01-045C02-077C02 -091C02-097C01-057 C02-001C01-051C01-041 C01-031C02-085C03-00 5 C01-053C01-029 C01-039C01-079C01-037C 0 1-009 C15-005 C15-00 7 C 03-0 13 C0 2-081 C 01-023 C01-011C02-093C01-0 61 C15-009 C 0 2 - 0 9 5 C02-075C 01-035 C03-017C01-017BLACKCREEK TRAIL DUNKIN AVENUE DEVON D A L E STRE E T ABBEYWOOD CRESCENT OBANCOURTGOLDPINE AVENUEBA R RI N G TON P L A C E ALDERB R OOK DRIVE GEORGE REYNOLDS DR IVE ABBEY W O OD C RESCE NT MO SSG ROVE C O URT CARRIAGE LANEMC LEL LAN DRIVE NASH R O ADFIRWOODAVENUEBROAD L A N D S C R E S C E N T KINTYRE STREETMAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 26 MAP 27 MAP 28 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 18 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 419 C33 C14 C13 C01 C39 C13-006 C13-011C13-019C33-011C13-022C13 -009 C 33-00 1 C39-00 7 C01-0 03 C13-0 25 C01-001C14-003C33-003C01-005 C33-013 C01-063C01-05 5 C01-059C13-0 29 C14-001C 13-115C01-045C01-05 7 C33-017 C13-015C01-051C13-017C33-005C33-01 9C33-009C13-089BC13-005C01-017C01-053C13-001 C13-02 1 C 0 1 -009 C01-0 61 C1 3-02 3 C01-011C13 -027C13-113C13-111C13-003TRULLS ROADDEVONDALE STREETBL UEGRA S S GA T E NA SH ROA D ABBEYWOOD CRESCENTGOLDPINEAVENUE BA R RI N G TON P L A C EGOLDPINEAVENUEMOSSGROVE C O U R T 4TH AVENUE AB B EY W OO D C R ES C E N T REGIONAL HIGHWAY 2 RICHFIE L D SQUAR E RIC HFI ELD SQUARE MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 27 MAP 28 MAP 29 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 19 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 420 C28 C39 C28-001C13-035 C39-00 7 C13-031C39-009C13-043C13-055 C13-057 C28-005C13-041 C13-039 C13-037 C13-033C13-027 C13-06 3 C13-029 C13 -065 C1 3 -0 67 C1 3-0 69 JANEAVENUERICHFIELDSQUARE4TH AVENUE WESTMO R E S T R E E T REGIONAL HIGHWAY 2 NASH R O A D MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 MAP 28 MAP 29 MAP 30 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 20 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 421 C25 C32 C40B C40A C25-009C40- 0 0 9 C4 0 - 0 0 5 C25-001C32 -007C25-013 C 25-0 31 C25-033C 2 5 - 0 3 9 C32-011C2 5-011C25-003 C28-005C40-019C40-021 C13-06 5 C25-041C25-005C32-00 5C40-011C25-047C25 -015C25-045 C 2 5- 0 3 7C25-043C40-007 C32-009C13-0 6 3 C25-007C32-003C32-001WESTMO R E STREET MOYSE DRIVELIVING COURTCOURTIC E ROAD J O L LI F F E S T R E E T FEWSTER STREETMOULTON COURTNASH R O A D REGIO N A L H IG H WAY 2 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 20 MAP 21 MAP 22 MAP 29 MAP 30 MAP 31 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 21 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 422 C25-017C25-009C 25-0 31 C25-033C25-021C25 -011C25-0 13 C25-019 C25-02 7 C25-047C25-045C 2 5 - 0 3 7 C25-015 C25-007M O U L T O N C O U R T M OYSE D R IVE LIVINGCOURTJ O L L I F F E S T R E E T SIMN ICKCRESCENTFEW STERSTREETREGIO NAL HIGHWAY 2 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 21 MAP 22 MAP 30 MAP 31 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 22 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 423 C10 C10-001 C10-0 07 C 10-003 EASTLAWN STREETTOWNLIN E ROAD NORTHTOWNLIN E ROAD SOUTHR EGIONAL H IGHW A Y 2 NASH ROAD KING STREET EAS T VI OLET H A LL R O A D MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 23 MAP 24 MAP 32 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 23 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 424 C10-005C11- 0 3 3 C10-123C10-115 C11-039 C10-111C10-119C10-009 C11 -0 1 3 C10-003 C11-035 C1 0-0 17 C10-011C1 0-015 C10-0 13 C10-113 C10-0 07 C 10-019 C 10-021 C10-025C10-023DALE PARK DR IVE KING STREET EAST REG IONAL HIG HW AY 2 TOWNLINE ROAD SOUTHTOWNLINE ROAD NORTH D ALE PA R K DR IVE CLOVERFIELD STREETDARLINGTON BOULEVARDBRI DLE COURT VARCOE ROADNASH R O A D MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 23 MAP 24 MAP 25 MAP 32 MAP 33 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 24 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 425 C10-121C08-009C0 8 - 0 0 5 C 2 0 - 0 0 5 C09-029C11-003 C11- 0 3 3C11-037C09-003 C0 9 - 0 1 1 C08-019 C10-123C 1 1 - 0 1 7 C10-115 C20-009C11-039 C10-119C08-007C11-0 2 9 C11-019C0 9-005 C 09-007 C09-009C09-031C08-013C09-033C09-023C 0 9-0 1 3C09-035C11-035C11-015 C09-017 C08-015 C 09 -027 C 1 1-00 9 C08-017 C10-113 C09-02 5 C0 9-03 7 C11-0 1 3 C1 1-011 C09-021C09-039C09-041C09-019 C11-005 C11-007 C11-031 VA LLEY CREST DR IVE VARCOE ROAD CLOVER F I E L D S T R E E T SPRYFIE L D T R A I L DAL E PA RK D RI VECHERRYBLOSSOMCRESCENT B RIAR H ILL GA TE REGIONAL H I G HWAY 2 CENTERFIEL D DRI VED ALE PA R K DR IVE BE L L E V IE W COU R T DARLINGTON BOULEVARDNASH R O AD OLD K INGST ON R OA DCHERRYBLOSSOMCRESCENTMAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 24 MAP 25 MAP 26 MAP 32 MAP 33 MAP 34 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 25 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 426 C08 C07C11 C09 C41 C20-00 7 C0 8 - 0 0 5 C03-003C11-001 C 2 0 - 0 0 5 C41-001C03-0 1 1 C09 -00 9 C11-007 C05-045C 09 -001 C03-013 C05-0 1 7 A C08-01 9 C 19-02 1 C04-165C08-001 C0 3 - 0 0 1 C05-011C05-015C05-013C05-019 C09-003 C0 8 -003 C05-021C08-007C05-027 C09-005 C 09-007 C03-009C08-009C08-013 C03-005 C07-005C05-017B C05-0 2 3 C20-003 C08-015 C0 8 -01 7 C07-001C07-003C08-011C04-167C03-019 C11-005 C04-163 C11-003 PRESTONVALE ROADTOOLEYROADBLACKCREEK TRAILP HAIR AV ENUE WH IT E CLIFF E DR IV ECENTERFIELD DR IVE OLD KI N G S T O N ROA D WINDSO R V A L L E Y G A T E RENWI CK ROAD R EGIONA L HIG HWAY 2 OLD K IN G S TO N R O A D ROBERT ADAMS DRIVEOSGOODE GATE BE L L E V IE W COU R T WIND SOR VALLEY PLACENASH ROAD VALLEYCRESTDRIVE MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 25 MAP 26 MAP 27 MAP 33 MAP 34 MAP 35 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 26 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 427 C05-025C03-0 1 1 C04 -069C03-017 C04-06 3 C0 4 - 1 6 1 C03-01 5 C04-1 53 C 04-067C04-061C04-073C04-405C04-169C03-009C04-085C03-005 C04-403C04-0 83 C04-07 7 B C04-075C04-157C 05-02 3 C04-151C04-077AC04-159C03-019 C03-013 C04-15 5 A C04-15 5 B C0 4-079 C 04-081 C04-065C04-071C04-167C04-163PRESTONVALE ROADSTUART ROADSANDRINGHAM DRIVE STRAT H A L L A N D RI V EBLACKCREEK TRA IL RENWICK ROAD K E N N E D Y D R I V E ROB ERT A D A M S DRI V E BLACKC R E E K T R A I L P HAIR A VENU E LYNDALE CRESCENT STE PHEN A V E N U E ST IRLI NG AVENU E REGIO N AL HIG H W A Y 2 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 26 MAP 27 MAP 28 MAP 34 MAP 35 MAP 36 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 27 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 428 C14 C04-379BC04-115C04-35 7C04-397C04-363 C04-260 C04-097C04-383 C04-087 C0 4-1 05 C04-137 C04 -117 C04 -39 5 C04-379AC04-111C04-08 1 C04-10 1 C 04-2 5 7B C04-1 3 1 C04-127 C 04-4 01 C 0 4-3 61 C 04-387 C04 -3 73 C04-261C04-389 C04 -369 C04-093C04-125 C 0 4 -391 C04-089C04-07 7 B C0 4 - 0 9 5 C04-1 53 C04-109C04-375C04-271C14-003C14-001C04-085C14-009C04-091C04-123C04-0 83 C0 4 -367 C04- 1 0 7 C04-129C04-139C04-151C04-147 C04-10 3 C 0 4-2 7 3C04-403C04-149C04-385 C0 4-079 C04-399C14-005C 04 -355 C04 -145 C04-359C04-133C04-393C14-013C14-007C04-365C04-371C14-011POOLTON CRESCENTSANDRINGHAM DRIVEM C M A NN C RESCENT TRULLS ROADSTRA THAL LA N DRIV E BUYSONCRESCE N T F A I R C O M B C R E S C E N T STEPH E N A V E N U ESTIRL ING AVENUE REGIONA L H I G H W A Y 2 KENNEDY DR I VESTUART ROADBUSHFORD STREETMAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 27 MAP 28 MAP 29 MAP 35 MAP 36 MAP 37 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 28 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 429 C28 C28-001C04-24 7 C28-013 C0 4 -27 5 B C0 4-2 60 C28-023C04-27 5AC04-129C04-253C04-233 C04-251 C28 -00 3 C28-0 31 C0 4-231 C04-229C0 4 - 2 3 9 C 04-25 7B C28 -009 C28-097C2 8 - 0 2 5C28-021C28-029C04-240 C 0 4 -23 5C28-103C04 -2 41 C04-271 C28-017 C28-007 C28-101C04-255C04-237BC14-009C04-123C0 4-237A C28-01 9 C2 8 - 0 2 7 C04-2 8 1 C28 -0 15 C04-2 7 9 C0 4 -2 45 C0 4 -273C14-007C04-249 C04-243C14-013C28-099 C14-015C28-005C14-011RICHARDGAY AVENUESANDR I N G HAM DRIV E WEAVERSTREETSA NDRI NGHA M DR IV E GRANARYLANEBRO W N S T ONE CRES C E N TTRULLS ROADBUSHFORDSTREETCAL EC HE A VENUE AVON D A LE D R IVE REGIONAL HIGHWAY 2 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 MAP 28 MAP 29 MAP 30 MAP 36 MAP 37 MAP 38 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 29 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 430 C 2 8 - 0 2 7 C28-089 C28-073C04-283C28-0 13 C28-07 1A C28-0 61 C2 8-055 C28-003 C28-043C28-039C28-0 31 C28-087 C28-045 C28-081C28 -071B C28-029C28-033 C28-01 7 C28-077 C28-063 C28-041C04-282C28-007 C28-067C 28-0 53 C04-2 79 C28-069C28-011C28-03 5 C28-009 C28-04 7C28-075C28-083C2 8-01 5 C28-079 C28-06 5 C04-28 1 C28-091C04-324AC28-057C28-0 85C28-095C28-049 BC28-037 C 28-05 1 C 28-0 49A C 28 -0 59 C28-093C28-005 SAN DRINGHAM DR IV E STAGEMASTER CRESCENTAVONDALE DR IVE BRO W N S T O NE C R E S C E N T CALEC HE AV ENUE REGIONAL H I G H W A Y 2 COURTICE ROADFIELDCREST AVENUESHORT C R E S C E N T MAP 20 MAP 21 MAP 22 MAP 29 MAP 30 MAP 31 MAP 37 MAP 38 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 30 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 431 C2 8-05 1 C28-0 5 5 C 28-0 53 C28-059 C28-057C 2 8-049A S ANDR IN GHAM DRIVE FIELDC R E S T A V E N U E STAGEMASTER CRESCENTCOURTICE ROADMAP 21 MAP 22 MAP 30 MAP 31 MAP 38 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 31 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 432 C12 C38 C12-063 C38-019 C1 2 - 0 5 3 C38-011C38-015C12-027C12-037C38-003C12-039C12-0 49 C38-001 C12-029C12-065C12-033 C12 -05 1A C12-041C12-069 C 12-0 51B C38-013BC12-035 C12-055C1 2-095 C38-017 C12-025 C12-067 C12-013C38-023C12-047 C12-0 15 C12-0 61 C12-057C12-071 C12-0 43 C38-021C12-045C12-073C12-059C38-013AC1 2 -09 3 LABRADOR DRIVETOWNLINE ROAD SOUTHFOXHUNT TRAIL CA RLING A VE N UE EMPI RE CRESCENTEDINB OROU GH L A NE M E R IV AL E C OURT BARRO N COUR T KINGSVIEW COURT KI N GSW A Y GATE EASTLAWN STREETDARLI NGTON BOULEVARDKINGSWO ODDRIVE MAP 23 MAP 24 MAP 25 MAP 32 MAP 33 MAP 39 MAP 40 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 32 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 433 C38 C12-001C3 7 - 0 0 3 C38-003 C38-001C19-013C 12-011C12-057C12-007C1 2 -00 9 C38-023C12-0 15C12-071C38-021C12-073C12-059C12-013KINGSWOOD DR IVE DARLI NGTON BOULEVARDKINGSVIEW COURT E DINB OROU GH LA NE WHITE CL IFFE DR IVE FOXHUNT TRA IL MAP 24 MAP 25 MAP 26 MAP 32 MAP 33 MAP 34 MAP 39 MAP 40 MAP 41 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 33 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 434 C21 C05 C19 C18 C4B C4A C21-017 C21-023C21-041C04-001C05-015C21-013C 0 5 -04 1 C21-063C19-0 2 1 C05-00 3 C04-003 C2 1-00 5 C0 5-004C2 1-027 C21 -0 19C05-011C05-013C21-0 3 5 C19 -005 C05-017BC05-009C18-001C05-001C21-009C21-0 0 3 C19 -007C21-015C04 -005 C04-002C19-009C19-015C19-017C19-011C19-013C19-019C21-037C19-003C05-027C21-029C21-045C21-061C21-0 3 9 C05-033C05-037C19-001 C2 1 - 0 0 1 C05-039C05-043 C21-011 C05-035C21-043C0 5-0 05 C05-031 C05-029C21-021 C21-03 1 C05-007C05-045C18 -003 C21-007 C21-033C21-059 ROBERT ADAMS DRIVEW HITTAK E R AVE NUEPRESTONVALEROAD DECOE COURTHAMP ST EAD G ATE H ATHAWA Y DR IVE SHEENANCOURTM ULHOLLAND COU RTHALSTEAD ROADWORTHINGTON DRIVERENWICK ROADWHITE CLIFFE DRIVESAGE W O O D AVENUE MAP 25 MAP 26 MAP 27 MAP 33 MAP 34 MAP 35 MAP 40 MAP 41 MAP 42 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 34 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 435 C4B C21-017 C04-009C 0 4 - 0 4 7 B C04-349C04-019C2 2 - 0 5 3 C21-023C22-021C04-0 4 9 C04-001C04-031C21-013C21-00 7 C04-037C04-043C22 -001 C0 4 -04 1 C22-057C21-063C 04 -003 C04-057C04-035C22-047C2 1-027C21-029 C04-071C04-163 C21-019 C 22 -051C04-065C22-025C21-009C04-023C21-015C22-049C04-405C04-027 C04 -005 C04-181C04-017A C 0 4 -0 5 5 C04-007C04-177C04-021C04-0 4 7 AC04-061C05-027C04-059C05-037 C 0 4 -02 5 C22-015AC22-055C22-023C21-061C04-0 29 C04 -017B C04-039 C22-013C05-033C04-015C04-179C04-045C04-051C21-011 C05-035C04-171C22-0 15B C 04-013C05-029C21-021C04-409C04-173C04-169C04-407C 04-175 C0 4-01 1 SANDRINGHAMDRIVEPARKLAWN DRIVEFO U ND COUR T HAMPS T E A D G A TE DECOE COURTPRESTONVALE ROADW HITTA KER AVE NUE CLA RET R O A DRENWICK ROADROBERT ADAMS DRIVEGLENABBEY DRIVEREX TOOLEY LANEOKE ROADLYNDALECRESCENTSAGEWOODAVENUEWINDHAM CRESCENTBEECHNUTCRESCENTMAP 26 MAP 27 MAP 28 MAP 34 MAP 35 MAP 36 MAP 41 MAP 42 MAP 43 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 35 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 436 C23-017C23-021C2 3 - 0 0 3 C23-027C04- 2 0 7A C23-007C04-260 C04-031C04-037C04-043C04-097C23-015C0 4 - 0 4 1 C2 2 - 0 1 9 C04-105 C04-269 C04-033C04-351C04-3 37 C04-205C04-035C22-10 5 C 2 3 - 0 2 3C04-265C04-263C04-101 C23-025C04-261C04-353C04-093C22 -0 81 C04-199 C04-207BC23-009C04-027 C0 4 - 0 9 5 C23-013C22-025C 23-0 31 C2 2-0 79 C22-077C 22-017 C22-109 C04-181C04-195C04-189C22-2 15 C23-019 C 22-213 C0 4 -1 93 C23-035 C22-023C04-099C04-20 1 C04-335 C 0 4 - 1 9 1 C04-203 C04 -3 45 C 04-187 C04-33 9 C22-229 C04- 1 0 7 C23-001C22-015AC23-005C04-0 29 C04-039 C22-013C04-179C04-045C04-10 3 C 0 4-1 85 C22-107C04-257A C 2 2-0 1 5B C0 4-34 7 C04- 3 4 3 C04-209 C04-257 B C04-267C23-0 29 C23-0 33 C23-0 11C04-183C04-349WADE SQUA RE INGLIS CO U RT YORKVILLECOURT FOUND COURT SANDRINGHAM DRIVEPARKLAWN DRIVE STUAR T R O A D OKE R OAD WADE SQUAREOKE ROAD WI LLIAM INGLES D RIVEGRANVILLEDRIVE ING L IS AVEN UE GLENABBEY DRIVEWINDHAMCRESCENTYORK V ILLE DRIVE HILLHU R S T CRE S CE NT JOHN W ALTER CR ESCE NT MAP 27 MAP 28 MAP 29 MAP 35 MAP 36 MAP 37 MAP 42 MAP 43 MAP 44 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 36 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 437 C04-247 C23-021 C04- 2 0 7 A C04-269 C04-227BC04-301 C22-095C04-260 C04-331C04-225C 23-03 1 C04-3 37 C 2 3 - 0 2 3 C2 2-087C23-025C04-305 C0 4-339 C0 4-213 C22 -0 81 C22-101C22-103C04-207BC04-2 7 9 C04-289C22-089C22-091 C22-07 9 C04-307C04- 2 2 9 C22-077C22-083C04-283C2 2-0 85 C22-109 C04-205C04-287C04-315 C22-097C04-249 C23-035 C04-227AC04-20 1 C04-237 A C04-251C04-211 C04-203 C22-229 C22-0 99C14-015 C04-2 8 1 C04-2 19 C04-285C04-3 13 C04-245 C0 4 -2 23 C 22-093C22-107C04-257AC04-255 C04 -209 C 04-309 C04-335 C04-299 C04-257 B C04-253C04-295C04 -293 C04-291 C22-105 C04-2 97 C04-215C04-217C04-221C04-231 C04-311 C 04-333 INGLI S C OURT YORKVILLECOURT ADAIRSTREE TFARMINGTO NDRIVE GRANVILLEDRIVEJOHN W ALTER CRESCEN T BROWNSTONE CRESCENTWIL LIAM INGLES DR IVE WILK INS CRES CENT WADE SQUA RE YO RKVI LLE D RIVE WEAVER STREETSTONEFI ELD STREETAVOND A L E DRI VE INGL ISAVENUEHIL L H U R S T CR E S C E N T HEARTH S T O N E CRESC E N T TRULLS ROAD WA D E SQU AR E MAP 28 MAP 29 MAP 30 MAP 36 MAP 37 MAP 38 MAP 43 MAP 44 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 37 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 438 C04- 2 2 9 C 0 4- 3 19 C04-291 C04-324C04-3 2 6 C04-2 7 9 C04-289C04-329C04-282C04-287C04-283C04-227AC 04-31 5 C 04-331 C04-327 C04-317C04-285C04-3 13 C04- 2 8 1 C04-321 C04-323C04-324AC04-333 AVONDALE DRIVEFARMING TON DR IVE PING LEDRIV E WILKINS C R E S CENTSTONEFI ELD STREETHEARTHSTONE CRESCENTBRO W N S T O N E CRE S C E N T FIELDCRESTAVENUEWIL K INS C R ESCEN T MAP 29 MAP 30 MAP 31 MAP 37 MAP 38 MAP 44 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 38 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 439 C12 C38C38-001C38-005C38-013BC0 6 -00 7 C38-003 C38-011C38-007 C38-023C06-009 C38 -009 BI RKDALESTREETA T H ABA S CA S T R E E T TOWNLINE ROAD SOUTH CHERR Y D O W N DRIVEEASTLAWN STREETTOWNLINE ROAD SOUTHOL IVE AV E NU E KINGS W O O D DRIV E M CCL URE C O U R T KINGS WOODDRIVE PINEDALE CRESCENT GLEN RI DGE COU RT L ABRA D O R D RIV E SUN NYBRA E C RESCE NT MAP 32 MAP 33 MAP 39 MAP 40 MAP 45 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 39 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 440 C06 C16 C12 C37 C12-001C16-007C16-031 C16-027 C06-019C38-001C38-005C06-065C16 -0 35 C1 6-0 19C06-001C12-007C3 7 - 0 0 1 C16-003C16-017C06-003C16-015 C06-061 C38-003 C12-009 C3 7 - 0 0 3 C06-0 15 C0 6 -007 C21-053 C06-005 C16-021C06-011 C16-059 C38-007 C16-005C16-011C16-029C16-063C16-013C16-037BC16-009 C 1 6 - 0 2 3 C1 6-061C38-023 C16 -001 C06-017C 1 6- 0 3 7 A C06-009 C21-051 C06-069C16-02 5 C16 -0 3 3 PI N EDALE C RESCEN T TOWNLINE ROAD SOUTH PI NEDAL E CRESC E N T CHE RRYDO W N DRIV E PE BBL EBEAC H D R IVE GL EN A BB E Y D RIVEHEMMINGWAY DRIVEKINGSWOODDRIVEAUBURN LANE N E WPO RT A VE NUE MAP 32 MAP 33 MAP 34 MAP 39 MAP 40 MAP 41 MAP 45 MAP 46 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 40 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 441 C21-023C21-043C 1 6 - 0 7 1C21-033C21-047 C34-023AC1 6-08 7C06-063 C16 -0 77 C16 -0 35 C16-0 1 9 C29-0 63 C21-0 53 C2 9 - 0 4 3 C21-027 C16-067C34-025 C21-055 C29-061C16-017C06-065 C16-057 C16-043C16-015 C06-061 C21-049 C16-011 C 1 6 - 0 3 9 C21-021C 3 4-033C16-051C21-057 C16-033 C 29-059 C29-065C16-041C16-055 C16-069 C34 -0 31 C 16-047 C06-067C21-02 9 C16 -061 C16-091C29 -0 4 1C16-013 C16-05 3 C34-029C16-049C16-073C16-083C16-081C16-05 9 C21-03 1 C16-065C16-037BC34-027C21-045C21-051 C 1 6-045 C21-024C21-05 9 C16-0 79 C34-023BC 1 6-0 3 7 A C16-0 75 PEBBLEBEACHDRIVEWORTHINGTONDRIVES H U T T L EW O R T H D R I V E THORNB URY CO URT ROBERT ADAMS DRI VEAUBURN COURT A U B U R N L A N E SAGE W O O D A V E N U E HU NTIN GTON CR E SCENT GLE N EAGL E S D R I V E GLENABBEY DRIVESADDLEBROOK COURTTHORNBURY STREETNEWPORT AVENUETHO RNBUR Y S TREET AUBUR N L A N E HUNTINGTONCRESCENTHEM M ING WAY DR I V E MAP 33 MAP 34 MAP 35 MAP 40 MAP 41 MAP 42 MAP 45 MAP 46 MAP 47 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 41 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 442 C22 C47 C47-00 1C47-0 03 C3 4 -0 3 7C21-023C22-233C 1 6 - 0 7 1 C22-027C16-085C22-043 C22-235 C 22-033 C22-009C22-007C22-031 C16 -0 77 C22-165 C22-067 C2 9-033 C22-159C2 9 - 0 4 3 C47-005 C29-031C21-027 C22-037C21-02 9 C29-013C22-023C 2 2 - 1 7 3 C22-061C2 9-02 9 C22-041C22-049C21-021C34 -033 C22-1 75 C47-007C22-055C22-029C2 9 - 0 3 7 C16-075 C22-1 69C22-047C34-031 C29-017C22-059C 2 2 - 1 7 7C22-181C22-057C22-025C22-013C29 -0 4 1 C29-035C34-03 5 C2 9-01 5 C22-161C16-073C22-16 7 C22 -0 39 C22-065C34-037bC 1 6 -089 C22-163C16-079 C16-083C16-0 87C22-171C21-024C29-019C16-091C22-035C22-045HUNTIN G T O N C RE SCENT P EA RSCOU RT WORDEN DRIVEA R N O L D J O H N S T O N S T R E E TSAGEW O OD AVENUEM E ADOWG L A D E R O A D GLENABBEYDRIVE OKEROADSADDLEBROOK COURTROBERT ADAMS DR IVE PRESTONVALE ROADREX TOOLEY LANEG LE N A B B EY D R IV E GLEN E A G L E S D R I V ETHORNBURY STREETMAP 34 MAP 35 MAP 36 MAP 41 MAP 42 MAP 43 MAP 46 MAP 47 MAP 48 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 42 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 443 C23 C22 C47 C47-00 1C47-0 03C22-065 C22-205C22-027C 2 2 - 1 9 3 bC22-007C2 2 -1 9 5 C22-067 C22-159C22-011C2 2-169 C22-009C22-023C 2 2 - 1 7 3 C22-197C22-207 C22-203C22-217C2 2 - 1 9 1 C47-00 5 C22-211C 2 2 - 1 8 5 C22-17 5 C47-007C2 2 - 2 0 1 C22-215 C22-029C22-199C 22-22 1 C22-22 3 C 2 2 - 1 7 9 C22-213 C22-227C22-025C22-013C2 2 - 2 0 9C23-001C22-181C22-187C22-189C22-231C22-171C 2 2 - 1 8 3 C 2 2 -1 7 7 MEADO W G L AD E ROAD GRANVI LLEDRIVE JOHN WALTER CRESCENT WOR DEN DRIVEHAYM AN S TR E E T KATER SON LA N E GLENABBEY DRIVEC A M E R O N F E R G U S O N S T R E E T A R N O L D J O H N S T O N S T R E E TOKEROAD WILLIAM INGLES DRIVE MAP 35 MAP 36 MAP 37 MAP 42 MAP 43 MAP 44 MAP 47 MAP 48 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 43 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 444 C22-2 2 5 C 22-22 1 C22-215 C2 2 -223C22-229C22-227MEADO W G L A D E RO A D GRANVI LLE DR IVE WILLIAMINGLES DRIVE K AT ERSON LANE B L OO R STRE ETTRULLS ROAD MAP 36 MAP 37 MAP 38 MAP 43 MAP 44 MAP 48 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 44 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 445 C06 - 0 5 5 C35-013C06-027AC16-031 C34-043 C06-0 65 C06-037C34-041C06-061 C06-02 5 C06-05 9 C3 4 -0 47 C06-015 C06-013 C06-041C 06 -02 9 C3 4-039C06-017C06-027B C16-033 C06-039C06-0 33C06-019C06-011 C 06-04 3 C06-023 C 0 6-049 C0 6-021 C0 6 -0 51 C06-035 C06-0 4 7 C06-0 53 C06-031 C 06-057 C 0 6-04 5 C3 4-04 5 PINEHU R S T AVENUE TOWNLIN E ROAD SOUTHBRUNTSFIELDSTREET SUNNIN G D ALE AV EN UE CHERR Y D O W N D RI V E PINEDAL E CRESCENTSUMME R L E A COURT DO W N C R E S C E N TBIRKDALE STREET DE L MARK COURT NEWPO R T AVENU E BIR KDALE COURT DO W N CR E S CENT GLENA BBEY D R IVE B LOOR STRE ET EAS T PINEDA L E CRESC E N T GORD VINSON A VENUE B LO OR S T R EETTURNBERRY CRESCENTMAP 39 MAP 40 MAP 41 MAP 45 MAP 46 MAP 49 MAP 50 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 45 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 446 C29-069 C 3 6-1 1 9C2 9 - 0 8 9 C35-013 C34-043 C29-085C29-113C29-067C29-09 3 C06-06 3 C29-061C29-06 3 C36-09 5C06-037C34-009 C29- 0 55 C29-079C2 9 - 0 4 3 C29-111 C36-031 C29-097 C29-077 C 29-071 C29-103C29-109C36-037C29-075C34-023AC06 -065C34-041C06-061 C29-105C06-05 9 C06-067C29-073 C29-081 C29-049 C29-107C34-019C06-049 C3 4 -045 C34-015C29-095C 36-007 C29-083 C29-051C29-039C29-059 C36-0 91 C 3 6 -09 3 C 44-045 C29-101C29-065C29-087C34-021C06-041C29-045C34-039 C2 9-09 9 C2 9 - 0 5 3 C0 6-033 C06-039C3 4 -005 C34-017C29-091 C29-057 C36-033 C 34-007 C36-039C06-04 3 C34-011C34-003C06-035C36-035C34-023BC3 6 -007 b C 3 6-12 1C29-065bC36-0 09 C 3 6 -01 1C34-013 C 0 6 -04 5 C29-047MEADOWGLADE ROADR O B E R T A D A M S D R I V E FENNING DR IVE KILGA N N O N A VENU E ROSSWELL DRIVEFERRISSQUARE GLENA B B E Y D RI V E PARTN E R D R I V E CALE AVE N U EBRUNTSFIE LDSTREETGORD VI N S ON A V ENU E SUMM E R L E A C O U RT D E WE LL C R E S CE N THUNTINGTON CRESCENTMONTA GU E AVEN UE DE WELL C R E S CENTFERRIS SQUARETURNB E RR Y CRESC E N T S H U T T L E W O R T H D R IV E BLOOR S T REET F RA NK WHEEL ER AVE N UE BECKET T CRESCE N T EASTFIEL D CRESCENTMAP 40 MAP 41 MAP 42 MAP 45 MAP 46 MAP 47 MAP 49 MAP 50 MAP 51 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 46 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 447 C29 C30C36-111C36-087C30-001 C29-113 C36-115C29-005 C 2 9-001 C36-083C2 9 - 0 4 3 C36-1 05 C36-031 C3 6-109 C36-113C36-107C36-099C36-037C 36-10 3 C 2 9 - 0 53 C36-097C36-101 C 3 6-085 C30-005C29-095C29-051C29-039C36-0 93 C 3 6-095 C36-079C29-045C29-013C29-009C29-011C29 -003C29-035C36-0 77 C29-007C36-033C36-081C3 6-117C36-039C36-11 9 C30-003C36-035C36-1 21C29-047C3 6-089 C3 6 -091 C30-007R O B E R T A D A M S D R IV E PARTNER DRIVE P EAR SCOUR T GORD VINS ON AV E NU E ROSSWELL DRIVEHUNTI N G T O N CRESC E N T FERRIS SQUAREFR ANK WH E EL ER A VENU E MON T A G U E A VEN UE C ALE A V ENUE MEADOWGLADE ROADSHUTTLEWORTH DRIVEFERRIS SQUAREBLOO R STREET PRESTONVALE ROADMCROBERTS CRESCENTBATHG A T E C R ESC ENT DEW E LL CRE SCEN T MAP 41 MAP 42 MAP 43 MAP 46 MAP 47 MAP 48 MAP 50 MAP 51 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 47 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 448 C29 C 29 -005 C 2 9-001 C30-005C29 -003 C30-003PRESTONVALE ROADB L OOR S TREET MAP 42 MAP 43 MAP 44 MAP 47 MAP 48 MAP 51 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 48 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 449 C35-019C35-001 C44-0 09 C34-043 C 44-0 1 7 C35-0 27 C3 5 -017 C35-005C35-013C35-015 C35-0 11 C35-021C34-047 C35-009C4 4 -014C35-023C35-007C44-023 C35-003C44-0 11A C3 5 -0 25 C44-011BC35-029 C44-013C34-045 C44 -015 WE S LE Y D R I V E KILGANN ON AVENUEPICKAR D G A T E TOWNLI NE ROAD SOUTHSOUTHDOWN STREET B INGHA M G A TE STAPL E S AVENUE NORMAN C O U R T DO W N C R E S C E N T SOUTHD A L E A V E N U E S OU T HG A T E D R I V E GRANDV I E W D RIVE EDNA COUR T SOUTHDOWN DRIVENORMAN C R E S C E NT SOUTHRID GE STREETGORD V I N S O N A V E N U E CORNIS H D R IVE DO W N C R E S CE NT MAP 45 MAP 46 MAP 49 MAP 50 MAP 53 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 49 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 450 C44 C44-033 C44-027 C4 4 -075 C44-061C44-067C44-003C34-043 C44-008bC44-065BC4 4 -0 17 C44-077C44-055C44-0 7 1 C44-073 C44 -0 69C44-039C35-005 C44-035 C44-0 24C44-025C44-029C34-041C44-016C44-022C44-037C35-013 C 4 4-0 07 C44-0 47 C4 4 -0 20C44-013C36-033C35-0 11 C44 -0 2 6 C34-045 C4 4-043 C36-091 C44-0 18 C44-057C35-009C44-049 C44-045 C36-005 C4 4 -006C35-007C44-051 C44-028 C44-01 4 C35-003C 4 4-011A C34-003C44-059 C44-002C 35-025 C 4 4-023 C36-019C44-011BC34-001C44-019C44-02 1 C44-005C44-031C36-0 1 7 C35-001 C44-053C36-0 1 3 A C44-065 C3 6-003 C36-007 b C44-008 C44-015 C36-031C36-005 b C3 6-013B C 3 6-01 5 C4 4 -009 C36-011 C44-063C36-0 01 C35-029 COUSINS STREET BA T HGATE CR ESCE NT C ORN ISH DR IVE ROSSWELLDRIVE FENNING DR I VETOWNLINE ROAD SOUTH DUD LEY CO URT SOUTH FI ELD AVENU E ROY N IC HOLS DR IVE BIN GHAM G ATE K IL G AN NO N AVEN U E PICKAR D G A T E CORNISH DRIVEFRANK W H E E L E R A V E N U E STAPL ES AV ENUE STAINT ONSTREETMON TAGUE A V E N U E AYLES WOR TH A VENU E MAP 45 MAP 46 MAP 47 MAP 49 MAP 50 MAP 51 MAP 53 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 50 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 451 C31 C36-0 2 1 C44-061C36-041C36-063C31-001C3 6 -0 5 1 C 36-04 5 C36-057C36-061C36-053C36-049C36-059 C36-044 C36-043C36-01 5 C36-073 C36-047C36-033C36-081C36-055 C 36-0 23 C36-029 C36-075 C36-079 C30-007C36 -0 6 9 C36-011 C44-063C36-019C 36-071 C36-065C36-017 C36-01 3A C36-067C36-031C31-005C36-0 27 C36-091 C36-0 2 5 C31-003C36-077 ROSSWELL DRI VEMONTA G U E AVENU E ROY N ICHOLS DR IVE AY LE SW O RTH AVE NU E BATHG A T E C R E S C E N T PRESTONVALE ROADSO UTHF IELD A VENUE BATHG A T E C R E S C E N T KERS EY CRES C E NT MAP 46 MAP 47 MAP 48 MAP 50 MAP 51 MAP 53 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 51 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 452 C48C48-005C48-003c48-001 BA SE L I NE ROAD MC K N I G H T R O A DHANCOCK ROADHANCOCK ROAD MAP 52 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 52 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 453 C44 - 0 1 0 C44-001 C44-004 C44-008C44-006 C44-008bC44-012 C44-002DUDLEY C O U R T SOU THGATE DRIVE FENNING DR IVE CO U SIN S S T R E E T BINGHA M G A T E SOUTHRIDGE STREETTOWNLINE ROAD SOUTHSOUTHPORT DRIVEHI G H W A Y 4 0 1 HI G H W A Y 4 0 1 MAP 49 MAP 50 MAP 51 MAP 53 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 53 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 454 C51B C51 C52 C52-00 3 C 51 - 00 7 C52-001 C5 1-013C51-001 C51-003 C51-011 C51- 0 0 5 C51-00 9 COURTICE SHORES DRIVE DARLI N G T O N PARK ROAD MEGAWATT DRIVECOU R T I CE RO A D ENERGY D R I V E HAUL ROAD MAP 54 MAP 55 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 54 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 455 C51-00 9 C43-021C43-013C5 1-017 C5 1-01 9 C51-013 C5 1-0 15 C51-011 C43-011E NERGY DRIVE OSBORNE ROAD HAUL ROAD MAP 54 MAP 55 MAP 56 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 55 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 456 C43 C43-001C43-021C43-013C43-029 C43-007c43-009C43-027 C43-005C43-011C 43-025 C 43-0 2 3 C43-006ENERG Y DRIVE OSBORNE ROADMAP 55 MAP 56 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Courtice 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 597 241 86 3 11 444240 29 55 525149 31272523 13 14 16 18 22 33 35 45 47 20 37 39 4341 24 5654 50 302826 1210 32 15 53 4846 383634 211917 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 56 of 56 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 457 APPENDIX D – MAP BOOK FOR HAMPTON Page 458 O L D S C UG OG RO A D HIGHW A Y 4 0 7 EDMONS O NAVENUEHIGHW A Y 4 0 7 P E R R Y A V E N U EELGIN L A NEWA L D R O N S T R E E T H05 H 0 4 - 0 0 7 H 0 4 - 0 1 5 H05- 001 H04-013H 0 5 - 0 0 7 H05-003H 04-009H04-011 H05-005H 0 5 - 0 0 9 H 0 5 - 0 1 1 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Hampton 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 2 MAP 1 MAP 3 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 1 of 3 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 459 O L D S C UG O G R O A D P E R R Y A V E N U E MILLSTREAM LANEEDMON SON AVENU EKE RR AVEN U E KING LANEORMISTON LANEH04 H03 H01 H02 H06 H 04-003 H06-001 H02-007H0 6 - 01 3 H02-005H04-001H01-001 H02-001H 0 4 - 0 1 5 H06-0 0 2 H04-009 H0 4-011H03-001H02-003H 0 4 - 0 0 7 H 0 4 - 0 1 9 H03-005H 0 4 - 0 0 5 H01- 0 03H03-003H 04-017MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Hampton 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 2 MAP 1 MAP 3 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 2 of 3 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 460 KER R AVENUE P E R R Y A V E N U E OL D S C U G O G R O A D KI N G LA N E LIBERTY STREETMILLVILLE AVENUEN O R T H DI VISI O N S T R E E TORMISTON LANEMILLSTREAM LANEORMISTON STREETH01 H06 H06-017H06-019H06-001 H06-003H 0 4 - 0 1 5 H01-001 H0 6 - 0 0 2 H06-005H0 6 - 0 1 3 H 0 4 - 0 1 9 H0 6- 01 5H03-005H0 1-003H03-003H06-007H06-009MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Hampton 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 2 MAP 1 MAP 3 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 3 of 3 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 461 APPENDIX E – MAP BOOK FOR NEWCASTLE Page 462 GR A D Y DRIVE G OMME AVENUE B UCK LES CO U RT THOMASWOODLOCKSTREETWH ITEH AND DRIVE RUDELL ROADPEDWELL STREETHIGHWAY 35 & 115GOHEENSTREETHIGHWAY 35 & 115ER SK INE DRIV E N ODEN C R E S C E N T WAMSLEY CRESCENTMAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 7 MAP 8 N 05-0 03 N05- 0 3 9N05-053N05-007N0 5 - 0 6 1 N03-027N03-013N05-0 57 N05-045AN05-017N05-023N05-013N 05-05 1 N05 -0 47 N 0 5-021N05-019N05-009N05-011N 0 5 -04 5N05-049N05-055 N0 5 - 0 3 7N05-063 N05-067 N03-025 N05-041 N05-071N05-035 N03-025SN05-069N05-02 9 N 05-0 31 N05-005 N 0 3-0 31 N0 5-0 4 3 N05-059 N03-039N03 -015 E N05-0 1 5 N03-015N03-025N N05-02 7 N03-015NN 03-0 3 9E N05-02 5 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 1 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 463 WHITEHAND DR IVE DONAL D POW E L L CRES CENT GRADY DRIVE GEORG E STR EE T WEST ALL E NS LA NE BARCHARDSTREETGRA DY DRI V ENODENCRESCENT G OMM E AVENUE BUCKL E S COURT A L D R I D G E L A N EPEDWELLSTREET MONRO E S TREET W EST M A N V E R S R O A D NORTH STREETGOHEENSTREETREMI COURTMAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 N04 N12 N06 N05 N31 N12-001N12-0 1 1 N06-00 1 N04-001 N05- 0 3 9 N31- 0 0 5N05-007 N0 5 - 0 6 1 N06-007N03-013N31-001N04-003N 05-043 N0 5-0 15N05-013N05-073N0 5 - 0 0 1N05-009N31-023N05-011N12-003N06-003N05-0 25N05-063 N12-013 N05-041 N12-005 N05-071N 05-003 N31-007N05-069N03-015N05-073SN12-009N05-005 N31-0 25 N 03 -015E N05-067 N12-007N05-065N05-035 N0 5 -037N05-033Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 2 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 464 BEAVERSTREETSOUTHMILL STREET NORTHANDREWCOURTALLE NS LA NE SYLVIACOUR TNORTH STREETKIN G AV EN U E EA ST M A N V E R S R O A D MONRO E S T R E E T E A S T AND REW ST R EET GEORG E STREE T EAS TBE AVER STREET NORTHGEORG E S T R E E T WE ST MONRO E S T R E E T W E ST WILMO T STRE ET MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 8 MAP 9 N15 N18 N04 N02 N18-001N04-019N01-02 7 N04-001 N0 4-011N01-019N 02-00 1 N04-005 N18-005 N01-051N04-02 7 N04-003N 12-005 N04-053 N15-A-003N15-A -005N04 -055 N04-051 N01-015 N04-057N01-017 N04 -013 N04-009 N04-02 5 N15-B -001N0 1-025N02-003N18-003N04-059N15-B-003N04-00 7 N 04-021 N04-017N04-023 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 3 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 465 KING A V ENUE EAST BEAVERSTREETSOUTHANDREWCOURTRAFTONSTREETH ARM ER DR IVESYLVIACOURT R ESNIK DR IVEORCHARD HE IGHTS DR IV EGRAHA M C O URT MCNAIRSTREETANDR E W STREE T OATLEY COURT ARTHUR STREETMAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 10 MAP 11 N15 N01-019N21-059N15-A -005 N14-033 N14-025A N21-041N21 -05 7 N0 4-0 3 9 N04-033N04-031N04-035N21-037 N04-053 N04-029N15-A -003 N04-02 7 N04-04 1 N21-049 N0 4 -055 N21-081N21-045N04-037 N14-027N01-0 35 N2 1 - 0 4 3N04-057N01 -017 N04-02 5 N0 1-037 N01-039N04-049N01 -033 N01 -0 31 N21-053 N01-02 7 N01-02 9 N14-025BN04-04 3 N15-B -001 N0 1-025 N2 1-0 51 N21-0 5 5 N 0 4-023 N04-045N04-051 N1 4-03 5 N04-059N15-B-003 N 01-041 N04-0 47 N21-0 47 N14-031N14-025C N14-029Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 4 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 466 ANDREW S T R E E T BROOKHOUSE DR IVEARTHUR STREETORCH ARD HE IGHT S DRIV E HAR M ER DR IVE RESNIK D RI V E LAKIN GDRIV EMCAULIFFESTREET W ILLI A M JOSE C O U R T CHA L LEN G E R C O URTMCNAIR STREETBLOO M AVEN UE K ING AV E NU E EAST MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 10 MAP 11 N 20-067 A N20-069 N14 - 019 N21-059N14-013N20-047N20-041N14-033 N21-049 N20-053 N20-059N20-031N21-057N21-081N14-041N 20-035N20-039 N 01-039 N14-009 N21 -051 N21-053N20-071N14-025BN20-037N20 -033N20-065N14-047 N 14-045 N21-0 5 5 N20-045 N20-04 3B N 2 0-051 N20-061N14-017N14- 01 1N14-015N20 -0 57 N 2 0-075 N 01-041 N 14-0 37 N20-043 A N14-025A N14-023 N14-031 N1 4-0 35 N 14-043 N14-021 N14-04 9 N14 -039 N14-025C N 14-051 N14-029N14-027 N 20-049N2 0-0 5 5 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 5 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 467 WILLIAM JOS E COUR TANDREWSTREET REGIO N A L H IG HW A Y 2 F A R ROW A V E N U E K ING AVE N U E EAST MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 11 N14N14-017N20-047N14-001 N14 -003 N14-049 N20-053 N20-049N20-045 N 2 0-051 N1 4 - 01 1 N14-007N14-015 N14-0 09 N14-005 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 6 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 468 KIN G AVEN U E WEST THOM A S WOODL O C K S T REET FOSTER CREEK DRIVEFLOOD AV ENU E GUS UL AVENUE RUDELL ROADERSKINE DRIVEGOHEENSTREETPEDWELLSTREETGI VEN ROAD R E GIONA L HIGHWA Y 2 MC DONALD C R E S C E NT RUTHERFORDDRIVEMAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 12 N10 N03 N10-049 N 03-063 N10-017N03-029N10-011N03-023N03-071 N10 -005 N0 3-0 73 N10 - 0 2 9 N 0 3-053 N03-065 N03-04 1 N10-039N03-033N03-069 N 10-031N03-051N1 0-0 2 1N03-061N10-041N03-035N03-059N1 0-0 6 1N03-045N10-019 A N03 -055N03-049N0 3-005 N10-035 N03-025 N03-057 N0 3-019 N03 -0 11EN03-047N03-011N03-015 N03-021 N03-025SN03-027 N03-031 N03-013N05-071N10-019BN10-043N10-015N10-007N03-017N10-009 N03 -00 7N03-037N10-0 01 N03-009 N 03-003 N 10-037N03-039N03-043N1 0-00 3 N10-013N10-065N10-033N03-001Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 7 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 469 FOSTER C R E E K D RIVEBARCHARDSTREETFLOOD AV ENUE EDWARD STREET WESTCOULSONCOURTDONALD POWELL CRESCENTDONCASTERCRESCENTGUSU L AVEN UE CHESTER LANEGIV EN ROADPEDWELLSTREET MASSEYDRIVE RUTH E R F O R D DR I VE GOHEENSTREETAL D R I D G E L A N E KING A VENUE W EST STANFORDCRESCENTLILLIAN CR E SCENT MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 13 MAP 14 N01 N10-049 N03 -0 63 N13 -017 N13-025 N13 - 0 4 7 N13-023BN13-059N31- 0 0 5 N10-017N03-045N03-071 N0 3-0 73 N31-011N10 - 0 2 9 N 01-0 03 N13-041N10-033 N13-043N03-069 N13-013N 1 0-031 N10-023 N31-009N05-073S N1 3-0 31N03-061 N13 -0 3 9 N 1 3 - 0 3 7 N13-019N31-023N10-027N13-035N03-059N13-027N03 -067 N 10-021 N09-011N31-013 N13-045N13-051 N03 -009 N10-059N10-019 A N13 -0 07 N1 3-0 61B N1 3-009 N13-015N10-035N10-063 N13-01 1N03-011N13-023 AN03-015N31-007 N13-02 9 N31-019 N31-025 N13-057N03-013N10-025N05-071N10-019BN03-065 N10-015N31-019N N31 -02 1 N13-053 N13-04 9 N 1 3-05 6 N 13-055 N 03-011 E N05-071SN13-021N 10-037 N 13-0 61A N1 0-06 1 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 8 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 470 CHURCH STREETNORTH STREETBEAVER STREET SOUTHEDWA RD STR EET EA STBEAVERSTREETNORTHCAROLINE ST REET EAST FO ST ER CR E E K DRI V E J AME S STRE E T W E ST EMILY STR E ET WES T ED WAR D STR EE T WES T CA ROLI N E STR EE T WES TMILL STREET NORTH KING AV ENU E WEST CHESTER LANEMI LL STREET SOUTHEM ILY STREE T E A S T KING AV E N U E E A S T BALDWI NSTREETLIL L I A N CR E S C E N T STANFO R D CR E SC ENT MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 N01 N19 N09 N13 N 01-0 0 1 N01 -047 N01-02 7 N13-0 2 5 N13 - 0 47 N19-039 N19-009 N01-019N04-003N19-003N1 9-01 5 N19-02 1 N01-043N01-049N13-041N13-01 1 N01-005 N01-051N1 9 - 0 3 1N13-043N 19-007N16-0 0 9N09-00 1 N19-005N13-0 31 N13-0 49 N1 3 - 0 3 9 N 1 3 - 0 3 7 N1 3-00 5 N0 1-0 11 N19-001 N04-00 7 N16-029N13-035N13-027N01-045N19-013 N01-01 7 N09-011N13-001 N01-013 N01-00 9 N0 1-0 07 N13-045N13-051 N 01-00 3 N19-019N13 -0 07 N1 3-009 N19-029N01-025 N19-017N01-015 N 13-003 N13-029 N19-011N13-063N19-023 N19-0 25 N13-033 N19-027 N16-031Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 9 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 471 CHURCH STREET E M ILY STREET WES T HARMER DRIVE MI LL STREET SOUTH JAM E S ST REET W E S T CAROL I N E S T R EET WES T BRIDGE S D RIVEBEAVER STREET SOUTH LAKING DR IVE EDWAR D STREE T WEST S H IPLEY A VENUE CAROLI N E S T R E E T E A ST JA M E S STR EET EA ST ED WA R D STR EET EA ST EMILY STREE T E A S T KING AV E N U E E A S T GLASS COURTLAKINGDRIV ERAFTON STREETCUTLERDRIVE MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 14 MAP 15N21-065 N21-013 N21 -019N01-019N21-09 1N16-023N21-041N16-015N 21-07 3 N2 1 - 0 9 3 N29-0 0 3N21-045N16-0 0 9 N21-01 7 N29-007N21-029N21-067N21-035N2 1-0 87 N21-0 23 N 21-0 25 N21-0 85 N16-029 N21-037N2 1 - 0 4 3 N21-069 N21-033 N20-081N21-021 N01-01 7 N21-031 N2 1 -079 N21-053N01-02 7 N29-005N16-017N17-005N16-019 N01-025 N21-051 N2 0-0 82 N21-0 71 N20-0 80 N16-011 N 20-079N21-027N 21-00 7N21-077N21-061 N21-047 N21-039N21-049N16-027N21-015 N 21 -06 3 N21-009N21-011N21-059N21-083 N16-013N16-025 N19-027 N16-021N16-031Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 10 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 472 E DWARD STR E ET EAST HIGHWA Y 4 0 1 HARMER DRIVE LAKING DR IVE BROOKHOUSEDRIV EGLASS COURTBRI DGES DR I VEBLOOM AVENU E R AVEY S T R E E T S HIPLEY AVENU ERAFTONSTREET HIGHWA Y 40 1 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 15 N29 N20 N28 N20B N28-011N21-065N20-025N20-019 N21-09 1 N28-005N 20-0 13 N28-001 N2 1 - 0 9 3 N21-07 3 N20-065N20-002N 20 - 0 1 7 N 2 8-007N20-037N29-007N21-067N20-001N29-0 0 3 N20-083N20-03 5 N21-069N2 0 - 003 N20 -023N21-051 N21-053N20-071N29-005N21 -063 N 20-00 9 N20-03 3 N20-015 N2 0-0 82 N 21-071 N21-089 N2 0-080 N21-075 N20-021N20-031N21-049 N20-011 N20-077N20-075 N20-07 9 N20-073N21-061N20-005N20 -081 N 21-0 07N21-011N20-007N21-009N20 -029 N28-003N20-027N21-059 N28 -009 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 11 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 473 RUDELL ROADHAR T BO ULEVAR DRAYMOND COURT SUNSET B OULEVA R D DONCA S T E R CRE S CENT HIGH WAY 4 01HIGHWAY 4 0 1 MAP 7 MAP 12 MAP 13 N25 N2 5-00 7 N1 0 -05 1 N 2 5 - 0 0 1N10-047N10-013N10-041N10-061N10-035N25-0 09 N25-005N25-003N10-049 N2 5-0 10 N10-0 53N10-045 N10-039 N10-037N10-043 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 12 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 474 SUN SET BOULE V A RD RUDELLROADHIGH W A Y 4 01RAYMOND COURTVI NCENT COURTHIGHWA Y 4 01 EDWARD ST R E E T W E S T CHESTER LANEL AKEVIE W R OA D DONC ASTER C R ESC EN T TORO NTO STREET HAR T BOULEV A R D H I G H WAY 401 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 N25N10-041N10-057N13-017 N1 0 -05 1 N13-013N 2 5 - 0 0 1 N13-019N10-035 N 25-0 09 N10-059N09-01 7 N25-005N09-019N13-015 N09-009N25-003 N13-011 N09-00 7N10-049 N09 -021 N10-0 53 N10-037 N25-010 N10-061 N 1 0-05 5 N09-0 13 N 0 9-015 N09-011Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 13 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 475 H I GHWAY 40 1 ROBE RT STR E E T WES T H IG HWAY 40 1 CHURCH STREET SUNSET B O U L E VAR D HART C OURT LAK EV I E W R O A D CHESTERLANEHARTBOULEVARD HIGHWA Y 4 01 H IGHW A Y 401 T ORONTO STR E E T MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 N08 N09 N16 N08-001N13-011 N13-063N08-003N09 -0 13 N16-009 N09-0 0 3 N16-003 N1 6-001N09-009 N09-005 N09-00 7 N09-001 N16-031N09-011Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 14 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 476 BEAVER STREET SOUTHCL IFTON S T R E E TAMOS STREETCHURCH STREETH IGHWA Y 401 TORON TO STR E E T ROBER T S T R E E T E A S T MILL STREET SOUTHHIGHWAY 40 1 HIGHWAY 401HIGHW AY 401 HIGHW AY 40 1 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 N08 N17 N26-015N08-001N16-015N17-001N26-018N17-003N08-003N29-007N26-013N16-009 N16-001N26-016 N16-003 N17-005N16-011 N26-021N16-031N16-013 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 15 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 477 CL ARKE ST REET PORT OF NEWCASTLE DRIVEM I LLIGAN STRE E T CATHERWOODLANECALDWELLCRESC E N T MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 N26 N27 N27-001N26-015N26-005N22- A-103B N22-A-099N 2 6- 0 0 3 N26-0 0 1 N2 2 - A -1 3 5 N 2 2- A - 1 3 3 N22-A-1 0 7 N22-A-10 9 N26-0 0 9N26-016 N 2 2 - A - 1 4 9 N2 6 - 0 0 7 N22-A -139N26-011 N27-003 N22-A -137N22-A-125N22-A -1 4 3 N22-A -147 N22-A-123N22-A -101N2 2-A-0 97N22-A-141N22-A-131N26-013N22-A-105N22-A-129N 22-A-1 03A N22-A -145N22 -A -11 7 N22-A-127N22-A-151Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 16 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 478 Q UEEN V I C TORIA S TRE E T METCAL F S T REET GEORGE MANNERS STREETMILL STREET SOUTHMAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 20 MAP 21 N26 N27 N32 N32-0 0 1N27-001N 2 6 - 0 0 3 N2 6-0 01 N2 6 - 0 0 7 N27-003 N27- 0 0 5 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 17 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 479 K E AT ING D RIV ETORONTO STREETMILL IGAN STREE T MAP 18 MAP 19 N24 N23N23-045 N 2 4 - 0 0 3 N23-00 1 N23-0 35 N 24-004 N24-001N23-05 5 N23-003 N23-04 7 N 2 3 - 0 4 3 N23-049 N23-005N23-041N23-039Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 18 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 480 LAKEBREEZEDRIVE SHIPWAY AVENUE TORONTO STREETMILLIGA N S T R E E T STILLWELLLANEDONALDSON DRIVEBELSEY LANESISSON LANEDOUG WALTON LANECORPORAL PATTERSON LANEK EA TING D RIVE ALLDREAD CRESCENTMAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 N24 N23 N23-009N23 - 0 6 9 N22-A-057N22-A-085N23-045N23-067AN23-073N23-029N 2 4 - 0 0 3 N23-023N23-051AN22-A-10 9 N23-021N23-085 N23-057 B N23-00 1 N23-083 N23-033 N23 -057A N2 2 -A-1 1 5 N 24-004 N22-A-111N2 3 -0 07 N24-001N23-0 51B N22-A-061BN23 -003 N22-A-087 N22-A-055 N23-04 7 N 2 3 - 0 4 3 N23-053N23-067B N23-081 N23-079N23-005N23-061 N22-A-061AN23-041N23-059N23-06 3 N 2 3-049 N23-071N23-037N 23-035 N23-039N23-075N23-031N23-019N23-065 N23-05 5 N23-011N23-015N23-025N22-A-1 1 7 N23-017N23-013N23-027N23-077 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 19 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 481 PORT OF NEWCASTLE DRIVEMILLIGA N STREET LAKEBREEZE DRIVE SHIPWAY AVENUE WATERVIEW LANEALLDREAD CRESCENTBLUENOSE LANE SCHOONER LANE CARVETHCRESCENTPORT OF NEWCASTLE DRIVEHODNE T T C RESCEN T STILLWELL LANEDOUG WALTON LANEMAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 N22N22-A-025N22 -A-1 1 3 N22-A -079N22-A-057N22-A-099N23-067B N 2 2 -A - 0 3 9 N22-A -0 0 1 N2 2 -A-003 N22-A-011 N22-A-1 2 1 N23-021N22-A-1 0 7 N22-A -041 N 2 2-A-019 A N22-A-081N22-A-083 N22-A-015N23-085 N22-A-10 9 N 22-B-023N22-A-093N22-A-013N2 2-A-035N22-A-111N 2 2 - B - 0 0 3 N22-A-0 37 B N2 2-A-019 B N22-A-033N22-A-027AN22-A-077N22-A -101N22-A-047N22-A-029BN22-A-0 9 7 N22-A-065 N22-A-087 N22-A-1 0 3 A N22-A-043N22-A-067 N22-A-049 N22-A-061BN22-B-019 N22-A-0 2 3 N22-A-053 N2 2 -A - 0 0 9 N22-A-055 N22-A-051N22-A-031N22-A-069N22-A-021N22-A-119N22-A-059N22-A-091BN 22-A-0 17 N22-A-071N2 2-A-0 9 5N22-A-105N22-A -007N22-A-061AN22 -A-02 9 AN23-065 N22-A-091A N22-A-005N22-A-089N22-A-075N22-A-063N22-A-045 N 22-A-1 15 N22-A-027BN23-019N22-A-073 N22-A-1 1 7 N23-017Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 20 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 482 SHIPWAYAVENU E DARCY S TREET QUEEN VI C T O RI A S T R E E T LAKEBREEZE DRIV ECARVETHCRESCENT MILL STREET SOUTHMAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 20 MAP 21 N22 N30N22-B-017N22-B-013 N30-009N30-005N30-001N22-B-005N 2 2- B - 0 0 7 N22-A -001 N2 2 -A-003 N 22-B-023 N2 2 - A -0 0 9 N3 0 -0 0 7N22-B-015N30-003N 22-B-025 N 2 2 - B - 0 0 3 N22-A-045N22-A -007N22-A-005N22-B-009N22-B-019 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newcastle 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 MAP 6 MAP 7 MAP 8 MAP 9 MAP 10 MAP 11 MAP 12 MAP 13 MAP 14 MAP 15 MAP 16 MAP 17 MAP 18 MAP 19 MAP 20 MAP 21 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 21 of 21 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 483 APPENDIX F – MAP BOOK FOR NEWTONVILLE Page 484 GEORGE BURLEY STREETPAYNES C R E S C E N T JONES A V E N U E CH A R LES TIL LEY C RE SCEN T NF2 NT02-015 NT01-005AN T 0 2 - 0 1 3NT02-019NT02-007NT02-003NT01-00 3 NT02-005NT02-011 NT 02 -009NT02-00NT 02-017 N T01-001 MAP 1 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Newtonville 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 1 of 1 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 485 APPENDIX G – MAP BOOK FOR ORONO Page 486 MILL STREETNORTH MILL LANEHIGHWA Y 35 & 115NORTH M I L L L A NE HIGHWAY 35 & 115PETERS P I KEDA V I DS CRESCE N T TAUNTO N R O A D ANDREWSROADHIGHWAY 35 & 115HIGHWAY 35 & 115HIGHWAY 35 & 115ROBIN S ROADO01-001 O02- 0 05 O03-013O02 -007 O03-007O03 - 0 11 O02-015O03- 0 0 9O03-021O0 2-013 O 0 2-0 0 1 O03-001O03-015O02 -009 O0 2-011 O03-017O02-017O03-003O02-003O01-003O03-005O03-023O03-019O 0 2-0 19 MAP 1 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Orono 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 1 of 5 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 487 MILL STREETMAIN STREETCHURCH STREET NORTHDICKSON STREET OLD CEMETERY ROAD PARK S T R E ET C E N TREVIE W STRE E T HIGH WAY 35 & 115CHURCHILL AVENUE HIGH WAY 35 & 115 O04-001 O06-007O06-015O04-0 05 O0 6 - 0 0 1O06-017O05-003O06-023O06-011O06-009O05-007O05-009O05-005O04-003O06-029O06-021O06-019O 06 -031 O06-027 O06-0 25 O06-003 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Orono 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 2 of 5 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 488 COBB LEDIC K STR EE T STATION STREET CHURCHSTREETNORTHMAIN STREETDU CHE SS S TREET PRINCE SS S T R EET SOMM E RVILL E DRIVE D UCH ESS ST RE ET PRIN C E S S STRE E T BOWEN S T R E ETLEIGH STREETO08-0 55 O04-001 O09-003O08-031O09-001O08-04 5O08-043 O05-001 O09- 0 0 5O0 6 - 0 0 1 O08-013O08-051O 0 8-015 O08-057 O 08 -037O05-005 O08-0 49 O 0 8-0 39O05-003O08-029O06-003O04-003O08-033O08-041MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Orono 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 3 of 5 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 489 STATION S T R E E T DUCHES S STREET MAIN STREETSO MMERVI L LE DR IVEROWE STREET BOW E N STREE T HIGHWAY 35 & 115 SO MM E R VIL L E DRIVE H I G HW A Y 3 5 & 1 1 5 COBBL E DI C K S TREET DUCHE S S ST REE T STATI O N S T R E E T HIGHW A Y 3 5 & 115 NORTH STATION STREET P R INCES S STREET ORONODIV IS IONSTREET HIGHWAY 35 & 115HIGHWAY 35 & 115O07-021 O07-007 O08-011O08-031O07-001O08 -045 O08-019O08-025 O08-047 O07-031O10-009 O10-003 O08-043 O10-011O0 7 - 0 0 3 O08-057 O10-015O08-013 O08 -03 9 O08-051O07-033O08-007O07-019O07-0 23 O 0 8-015 O07-029 O07-017O07-013 O08-021 O 08 -037 O07-015 O07-027 O08-0 49 O10-001O07-009O07-03 7 O 07-00 5O08-027O08-029 O 0 8-017 O07-035O07-011O08-033 O08-059 O0 7-025 O08-023O08-041MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Orono 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 4 of 5 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 490 HIGHWAY 35 & 115HIGHWAY35 & 115WINTERROADMAIN STREETCONCESSION ROAD 5HIGHW A Y 35 & 115 SOMM E R VI L L E D RI V E MILL PO N D RO ADHILLCREST LANEHIGHWAY 35 & 115HIGHWAY 35 & 115O08-011 O08-001O08-013O08-007O08-015 O08-017 O08-005O08-003MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Orono 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 MAP 2 MAP 3 MAP 4 MAP 5 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 5 of 5 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 491 APPENDIX H – MAP BOOK FOR TYRONE Page 492 LIBERTY STREET NORTHCLEMENS ROAD C ONCES SI O N ROA D 7 VENTON C OURT SU M MITCRE S T COUR T LORNE Y EO CO U R T MAP 1 T01 T02 T 1-00 9T1-003T1-001T1-007T02-001T1-005Clarington Storm Sewer Analysis - Tyrone 025507510012.5 Meters 1:2,000 MAP 1 Storm Structure Outfall Subcatchments Stom Conduit Below 80% Capacity 80 to 100% Capacity Above 100% Capacity MAP 1 of 1 This map is for information purposes only and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority takes no responsibility for, nor guarantees, the accuracy of the information contained within the map. Prepared by Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority: Dec 2021. Produced using information provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources, GRCA and other municipal sources. Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, 2021. Page 493 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: June 6, 2022 Report Number: FSD-025-22 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Director of Financial Services/Treasurer Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution#: File Number: By-law Number: Report Subject: Delegation of Authority for Approval of 2021 Financial Statements Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-025-22 and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That the Terms of Reference for the Audit and Accountability Committee be amended to delegate authority to approve annual audited financial statements; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-025-22 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Page 494 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report FSD-025-22 Report Overview The Audit and Accountability Committee (AAC) was created in 2020 with mandate to provide recommendations to Council regarding financial statements, external audit, internal audit, corporate control framework and risk management. In 2021, Council delegated authority to approve the 2020 Audited Financial Statements to the AAC. Canadian Accounting Standards require that the audit report date cannot occur prior to the date that those with authority to approve the statements do so; therefore, Staff are looking to delegate the authority to approve the financial statements to the AAC which is in line with their mandate. 1. Background 1.1 The terms of reference for the Audit and Accountability Committee currently include the responsibility to “review and recommend for approval the annual audited consolidated financial statements and associated statements.” 1.2 Canadian Auditing Standards require that the audit report date cannot occur prior to the date that those with the recognized authority have asserted that they have taken responsibility for those financial statements. 1.3 Prior to the creation of the AAC, the authority was with the audit committee which included the Mayor, CAO, and Treasurer. In 2020, Council created the Audit and Accountability Committee which includes three members of Council and one alternate. The AAC fills the intended role for oversight of financial reporting and in 2021 delegated authority was provided to the AAC specifically for the 2020 financial statements. 1.4 Given the role of the AAC, and given that the audit cannot be concluded until those with oversight approve the statements, Staff are seeking a change to the terms of reference of the AAC to remove the reference to “recommend”. This clarifies that the AAC has the authority to approve the statements, which would still be provided to Council. 1.5 Approval of the statements in a timely manner allows the Municipality to meet the requirements of banking agreements, funding agreements, Province of Ontario reporting requirements and provides timely financial reporting to the public. 2. Concurrence Not Applicable. Page 495 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report FSD-025-22 3. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that the terms of reference of the AAC be amended to delegate the authority for approval of the annual financial statements to the Committee. Staff Contact: Trevor Pinn, CPA, CA, Deputy CAO/Treasurer, 905-623-3379 ext. 2602 or tpinn@clarington.net. Attachments: Not Applicable Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 496 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: June 6, 2022 Report Number: FSD-026-22 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution#: File Number: CL2022-14 By-law Number: Report Subject: Supply and Delivery of One Single Axle and Three Tandem Axle Cab and Chassis Units Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-026-22 and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That Winslow Gerolamy Motors Limited with a bid amount of $1,229,244.52 (Net HST Rebate) being the lowest bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of CL2022-14 be awarded the contract for the Supply and Delivery of One Single Axle and Three Tandem Axle Cab and Chassis Units; 3. That the total estimated funds required for this project in the amount of $1,241,245 (Net HST Rebate) include $1,229,244.52 (Net HST Rebate) for snow removal equipment costs and other costs such as radios, GPS units, Clarington decal lettering and striping in the amount of $12,000 (Net HST Rebate) be funded by the Municipality as follows: Description Account Number Amount Fleet Replacement Roads - (2022) 110-36-388-83642-7401 $1,100,000 Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund 511-00-000-00000-7418 141,245 4. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-026-22 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Page 497 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report FSD-026-22 Report Overview To request authorization from Council to award CL2022-14 Supply and Delivery of One Single Axle and Three Tandem Axle Cab and Chassis Units. 1. Background 1.1 Tender specifications for the Supply and Delivery of One Single Axle and Three Tandem Axle Cab and Chassis Units with Snowplow, Wing and U Body Dump Spreader was prepared by the Public Works Department and provided to the Purchasing Services Division. 1.2 Tender CL2022-14 was issued by the Purchasing Services Division and advertised electronically on the Municipality’s website. Notification of the availability of the document was also posted on the Ontario Public Buyer’s Association website. 2. Analysis 2.1 Ten plan takers downloaded the tender document. 2.2 The tender closed on April 22, 2022. 2.3 One bid was received in response to the tender call. 2.4 Of the nine companies that downloaded the tender document but chose not to submit pricing: One company is a supplier and downloaded the tender document for information; One company did not manufacture or supply the commodity; Two companies did not have equipment available; Three companies advised their equipment did not meet the specification requirements; and Two companies did not respond to our request for information. 2.5 The bid was reviewed and tabulated by the Purchasing Services Division (see Attachment 1) and was deemed compliant. The results were forwarded to the Public Works Department for their review and consideration. Page 498 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report FSD-026-22 2.6 After review and analysis by the Public Works Department and the Purchasing Services Division, it was mutually agreed that the low, compliant bidder, Winslow Gerolamy Motors Limited be recommended for award of tender CL2022-14. 2.7 Winslow Gerolamy Motors Limited has satisfactorily supplied similar equipment to the Municipality of Clarington in the past and references did not need to be checked. 3. Financial 3.1 The cost of the single axle and three tandem axle cab and chassis units exceeds the allocated budget by $141,245 (Net HST Rebate). The additional funds required to complete this project will be funded from the Municipal Capital Works reserve fund. 3.2 The total funds required for this project in the amount of $ 1,241,245 (Net HST Rebate) include $1,229,244.52 (Net HST Rebate) for snow removal equipment costs and other costs such as radios, GPS units, Clarington decal lettering and striping in the amount of $12,000 (Net HST Rebate) is within the approved budget allocation and will be funded by the Municipality as follows: Description Account Number Amount Fleet Replacement Roads - (2022) 110-36-388-83642-7401 $1,100,000 Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund 511-00-000-00000-7418 141,245 3.3 Queries with respect to the department needs should be referred to the Director of Public Works. 4. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Director of Public Works who concurs with the recommendations. 5. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that Winslow Gerolamy Motors Limited being the lowest compliant bidder be awarded the contract for the Supply and Delivery of One Single Axle and Three Tandem Axle Cab and Chassis Units per the terms and conditions of Tender CL2022-14. Staff Contact: David Ferguson, Purchasing Manager, (905) 623-3379 x2209 or dferguson@clarington.net. Page 499 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FSD-026-22 Attachments: Attachment 1 - Summary of Bid Results Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 500 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report FSD-026-22 Attachment 1 to Report FSD-026-22 Municipality of Clarington Summary of Bid Results Tender CL2022-14 Supply and Delivery of One Single Axle and Three Tandem Axle Cab and Chassis Bidder Total Bid (Net HST Rebate) Winslow-Gerolamy Motors Limited $ 1,229,244.52 Page 501 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: June 6, 2022 Report Number: FSD-027-22 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution#: File Number: CL2020-16 By-law Number: Report Subject: Waste and Recycling Collection and Disposal – Road Sweepings Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-027-22 and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That the current agreement with GFL Environmental Inc. be amended to include the pick-up and disposal of Road Sweeping W aste as required by the Public Works Department. The estimated contract value per year is $492,229.42 (Net HST Rebate). Tender CL2020-16 has two optional one-year extensions available if utilized the three-year value for the disposal of road sweepings would be approximately $1,476,688.26 (Net HST Rebate); 3. That the funds required for this service be funded from the following operating account as approved by the budget: Description Account Number Amount HRDTOP MNTCE / SWEEPING / WASTE DISPOSAL 100-36-381-10260-7165 $492,229 4. That pending satisfactory service and pricing that the Purchasing Manager in consultation with the Director of Public Works be authorized to extend the contract for up two additional one-year terms; and 5. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-027-22 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Page 502 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report FSD-027-22 Report Overview To amend the existing waste agreement with GFL Environmental Inc. to include the pick-up and disposal of road sweeping waste. 1. Background 1.1 Street sweeping debris commonly includes litter, dirt, grass, leaves, and other vegetative matter. The sweeping debris may also contain pollutants including oil and grease, metals, sediment, paint, solvents, and automobile fluids, as well as phosphorus and nitrogen from vegetation, lawn fertilizer, and animal waste. Testing conducted within Ontario by the MOECC found some street sweepings contained a concentration of arsenic and other contaminants that can be dangerous to human health. 1.2 The Ministry of Environment (MOE) has in place strict requirements for the proper disposal of street sweepings to ensure responsible management and use of street sweeping debris to protect the public health and the environment by preventing it from contaminating ground water, surface water or soil. 1.3 It is the MOE’s position that the Street Sweepings are waste, as defined in the Environment Protection Act (EPA) and described in the Ministry’s General Waste Regulation, O. Reg. 347. The regulation provides various exemptions that allow wastes to be reused, recycled, etc. under specific circumstance without the need for environmental compliance approvals. However, there is no specific exemption regarding street sweepings. 1.4 The Municipality is able to store street sweeping debris temporarily, for up to six months, before disposal or use at a local transfer facility as per MOE definition; therefore, Hampton Depot can be used as a local transfer facility without an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) requirement with specific conditions, i.e., (1) in a covered container, or (2) on an impervious surface, covered with a waterproof material (i.e., tarpaulin or 10-mil plastic sheeting), and contained within the area (i.e., by berming the area), etc. The containment must be maintained for the duration of the storage period to prevent contaminant volatilization, runoff, run-on, leaching or fugitive dust emissions. Storage should not occur in an area where the material will wash into wetlands or waterways. 1.5 The above requirements are included with remediation work on the east side of Hampton Depot. The Public Works Department is anticipating that a drying pad will be installed with oil grit separators (OGS) for added environmental protection. Page 503 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report FSD-027-22 2. Analysis 2.1 Tender CL2020-16 was prepared, issued and awarded in 2020. (Report: PS-007-20). This tender was for the pick-up and proper disposal of waste and recycling departments and included optional pricing for the pick-up and disposal of both organic waste and road sweeping debris. 2.2 At the time of the award in 2020 it was decided that the Municipality would not include the optional items; however, as a result of a recent change in the Provincial Legislation that now requires street sweeping materials to be disposed of properly it is being recommended that the Municipality include the removal and proper disposal of Road Sweeping waste. 2.3 Public Works anticipates the installation at drying pad with oil grit separators for increased environmental protection at Hampton Operations Centre. The process of drying the material prior to disposal will help by reducing the overall weight thereby reducing the overall disposal cost. 3. Financial 3.1 The estimated cost has been based on 5,236 tons of waste per year with a cost disposal cost of $79.37 per ton (Net HST Rebate). Averaging 8 tons per lift the total number of lifts required would 655 at $117.02 per lift (Net HST Rebate). Based on the aforementioned estimates the annual cost is approximately $492,229.42 (Net HST Rebate). 3.2 The funds required would be funded by the approved 2022 Public Works operating budget for the disposal of the waste. Based on estimated volumes that Public Works collect with the sweepers the annual cost is estimated to be $492,229.42 (Net HST Rebate). the funds required for this service be funded from the following operating account as approved by the budget: Description Account Number Amount HRDTOP MNTCE / SWEEPING / WASTE DISPOSAL 100-36-381-10260-7165 $492,229 3.3 If the contract is extended for the two optional one-year terms the total three-year cost for the pick-up and disposal of the Road Sweeping Waste is estimated to be $1,476,688.26 (Net HST Rebate). Page 504 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FSD-027-22 4. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Director of Public Works who concurs with the recommendations. 5. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that the agreement with GFL Environmental Inc., tender CL2020-16, be amended to include the pick-up and disposal of road sweeping waste. Staff Contact: David Ferguson, Purchasing Manager, 905-623-3379 Ext. 2209 or dferguson@clarington.net. Or Brett Novak, Manager of Operations, 905-623-3379 Ext. 2909 or bnovak@clarington.net Attachments: Attachment 1 - PS-007-20 Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 505 Report Purchasing Services Corporation of The Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 Date: July 15, 2020 To: Andrew Allison, Chief Administrative Officer From: David Ferguson, Purchasing Manager, Purchasing Services Report#: PS-007-20 File#: CL2020-16 Subject: Waste and Recycling Collection and Disposal Summer Recess Procedure (Purchasing By-Law 2015-022 S.73 Recommendations It is respectfully recommended to the Chief Administrative Officer the following: 1.That GFL Environmental Inc. with a total bid amount for the initial two year term of $222,608.56 (Net HST Rebate), and an estimated contract value of $556,521 (Net HST Rebate) over the potential five-year term, being the lowest compliant bidder bidding all items and meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2020-16 be awarded the contract for the pick-up and disposal of waste and recycling as required by the Municipality; 2 That the funds expended for these services, be funded from respective facilit ies approved operating budget as required; and 3.That pending satisfactory service and pricing that the Purchasing Manager in consultation with the Acting Director of Operations, the Director of Community Services and the Director of Emergency and Fire Services be authorized to extend the contract for up to three additional one-year terms. Page 506 July 30, 2020 August 14, 2020 Page 507 Report No: PS-007-20 Page 3 1. Background 1. Tender specifications for the pick-up and proper disposal of waste and recycling from the municipally owned and operated facilities were prepared by the various departments and provided to the Purchasing Services Division . 2. Tender CL2020-16 was prepared and issued by the Purchasing Services Division and advertised electronically on the Municipality’s website. Notification of the availability of the document was also posted on the Ontario Public Buyers Association’s website. Twelve companies downloaded the tender document. 3. The Tender closed on May 29, 2020. 4. In view of the Summer Council Recess, authorization is requested to award the above contract in accordance with Purchasing By-Law #2015-022 Part 2 Section 73, Council Recess Procedures. 2. Analysis 5. Twelve companies downloaded the tender document and four submissions were received in response to the tender call. Three bidders priced all the items contained within the tender document. One company priced only two of the nine items. The tender notes that the Municipality intends to award the contract to one bidder, however, the Municipality reserves the right to award the Tender in part or in whole or to split Items specified between one or more bidder. 6. The eight companies who chose not to submit pricing were contacted to ask why they decided not to bid. The responses are as follows: ▪ One company was an association for distributing the tender document to its members; ▪ One company was a supplier for the containers; and ▪ Six company did not respond to our request for information 7. The bids were reviewed and tabulated by the Purchasing Services Division (see Attachment 1). 8. The bid results were forwarded to the Operations Services Department, Community Services Department and Emergency and Fire Services Department for their review and consideration. 9. After review, analysis and discussions the departments mutually agreed that the low bidder bidding all items, GFL Environmental Inc., be recommended for the award of contract CL2020-16. 10. GFL Environmental Inc. has successfully provided similar services to the Municipality of Clarington in the past therefore no reference checks were completed. Page 508 Report No: PS-007-20 Page 4 3. Financial 12. The annual cost is approximately $111,304.28 (net HST Rebate). The initial contract term is for two years. The value of the contract for the two-year period is estimated to be $222,609 (net HST Rebate). 13. Pricing received is firm for the initial contract term of two years. 14. The Municipality has the option to extend the contract for up to three additional one-year terms pending satisfactory service. The tender document stipulates that if the Municipality elects to exercise the option to renew the contract for the additional optional one-year terms, then pricing shall be adjusted only on the anniversary date of the Contract award. Proposed price increases should not exceed the annual percentage change in the most recent issuance of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) All items – Ontario, as issued by the Statistics Canada, and remain firm for the rest of that Contract year. The potential five-year contract value is estimated to be $556,521 (Net HST Rebate). 15. The expended funds will be drawn from respective facilities approved operating budget. 16. Queries with respect to the department needs should be referred to the respective Department Head. 4. Concurrence 17. This report has been reviewed by the Acting Director of Operations, the Director of Community Services as well as the Director of Emergency and Fire Services concur with the recommendations contained with this report. 5. Conclusion 18. It is respectfully recommended that GFL Environmental Inc. with a total bid amount, for the initial two year term, of $222,608.56 (Net HST Rebate), being the lowest compliant bid, bidding all items, be awarded the contract for the provision of waste and recycling collection and disposal as per the terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2020-16. Attachments: Attachment 1 – Summary of Bid Results Page 509 Report No: PS-007-20 Page 5 Attachment #1 Municipality of Clarington CL2020-16 Waste and Recycling Collection and Disposal Bid Summary Annual Cost BIDDER Total Bid (including HST) TOTAL BID (Net HST Rebate) Waste Connections* $38,127.10 $34,519.07 GFL Environmental Inc. $123,706,89 $111,304.28 U-Pak Disposals (1989) Limited $135,424,.43 $119,921.99 Waste Management of Canada Corporation $141,424.43 $127,039.03 * Denotes submission whereby not all categories/items have been bid. Costs for Initial 2-year contract term. BIDDER 2-year Total Bid (including HST) Est 2-year Total Bid (Net HST Rebate) Waste Connections* $76,254,21 $69,038.14 GFL Environmental Inc. $247,413.77 $222,608.56 U-Pak Disposals (1989) Limited $270,848.85 $239,843.97 Waste Management of Canada Corporation $282,572.77 $254,078.05 * Denotes submission whereby not all categories/items have been bid. Page 510 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: June 6, 2022 Report Number: FSD-028-22 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution#: File Number: By-law Number: Report Subject: Additional Funding for Shaw House Renovation Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-028-22 and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That an additional amount not to exceed $200,000 from the Community Services Building Refurbishment Reserve Fund be allocated to the Shaw House Renovation Capital Project; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-028-22 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Page 511 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report FSD-028-22 Report Overview With the escalating costs of capital projects, Staff are anticipating that there may be insufficient funding available to award the construction tender for work to renovate the Shaw House (156 Church Street, formerly the Edna Thomson Learning and Child Care Centre). The Municipality has previously tendered this renovation project, and based on the results of the costing we received, made a decision to cancel the tender and reconsider the proposed renovation plan. Subsequently the scope of the renovation has been revised and the new tender is scheduled to close in mid June. As current market conditions continue to impact construction costs, staff are seeking consideration for access to additional funding that may be needed to approve this project and commence with the renovation at 156 Church Street. The Municipality has received funding from the Government of Canada towards this project that does have a project completion deadline of December 31, 2024 with eligible costs incurred prior to December 31, 2023. 1. Background 1.1 The Municipality acquired the building located at 156 Church Street in 2019 from the Region of Durham. The property was the former location of the Edna Thomson Learning and Child Care Centre, which has now relocated within Clarington. 1.2 The following funding has been provided/approved by Council Year Source Amount 2020 Tax Levy $300,000 2021 Rate Stabilization 300,000 Tax Levy 175,000 Page 512 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report FSD-028-22 Year Source Amount Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (COVI-19 Resiliency) 300,000 Total $1,075,000 1.3 With the release of the second tender for this renovation work, the completion is expected for early 2023. This would provide valuable space for the Municipality which could be used for both municipal and community purposes. 1.4 As this project has previously been tendered, any delay in awarding the subsequent tender release would not be projecting a positive message to the construction community and may have a negative impact when seeking responses in the future. 2. Additional Funding Request 2.1 In consultation with the Director of Community Services, Staff are asking for an additional $200,000 of funding for the Shaw House Renovation. It is felt that with the added costs of construction the existing available funds could be insufficient. 2.2 To avoid delay in approval of a successful tender award, which could result if Council is in a restricted activities period starting in August 2022, Staff would ask that approval for an amount up to $200,000 be funded from the Community Services Building Refurbishment Reserve Fund. The Community Services Building Refurbishment Reserve Fund has a balance in 2021 of approximately $1.3 million, it is not anticipated that this request will detrimentally impact future availability of this fund. 2.3 Staff are of the opinion that if the $200,000 is not sufficient the project would need to be reconsidered, which could include the loss of the provincial/federal funding. 3. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Director of Community Services who concurs with the recommendations. Page 513 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FSD-028-22 4. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that Council provide the additional funding to allow for the completion of the renovation work at Shaw House. Staff Contact: Trevor Pinn, CPA, CA, Deputy CAO/Treasurer, 905-623-3379 ext.2602 or tpinn@clarington.net. Attachments: Not Applicable Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 514 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Date of Meeting: June 6, 2022 Report Number: FSD-029-22 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Deputy CAO/Treasurer Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution#: File Number: CL2022-16 By-law Number: Report Subject: Newcastle Community Park Construction Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-029-22 and any related delegations or communication items, be received; 2. That Council accept staff’s preferred approach to cancel CL2022 -16, and retender the Newcastle Community Park Contract for construction in 2023; Or 3. That the bid received from Quality Property Services having the lowest price meeting specification in the amount of $3,217,520.39 (Net HST Rebate) and subject to a satisfactory reference check be awarded the contract f or Newcastle Community Park Construction; 4. That should Council select recommendation #3, the total funds required for this project is $3,962,646.79 (Net HST Rebate), which includes the construction cost of $3,217,520.39 (Net HST Rebate) and other costs including design, material testing, contract administration, permit fees and contingencies in the amount of $745,126.40 (Net HST Rebate); and that the budget increase in the amount of $2,387,646.79 (Net HST Rebate) to fund the Newcastle Community Park project be approved from eligible Development Charges Reserve Funds and the Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund at the discretion of the Treasurer; and 5. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-029-22 and any delegations be advised of Council’s decision. Page 515 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report FSD-029-22 Report Overview For Council to consider the two options presented in the Recommendation which is to cancel CL2022-16 and retender the Newcastle Community Park Contract for construction in 2023 or to award a contract to the low compliant bidder and approve additional funds from the eligible Development Charges Reserve Funds and the Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund at the discretion of the Treasurer. 1. Background 1.1 In 2019, in accordance with the Municipality’s Official Plan, Council approved a $75,000 budget for the design and tendering of Phase 1 of the Newcastle Community Park, located directly southwest of the Diane Hamre Recreation Complex. At that time, the Community Park was envisioned to have two illuminated baseball diamonds, playgrounds, connecting walkways and a shade structure. The MBTW Group was hired as the Landscape Architect and MJS Consultants was hired as the Electrical Consultant for the design of the park. Cambium Inc. was hired to complete a geotechnical investigation for the park property. 1.2 Through public consultation in February 2020, the ultimate park programming including illuminated baseball diamonds with connecting paths to a skateboard park, shade structure, and illuminated pickleball and tennis courts was selected. Due to the park property being largely situated in the Wilmot Creek flood plain, within the GRCA regulated limits, and the considerable slope of the existing topography of the site towards Wilmot Creek, filling within the floodplain and grading required to accommodate two level baseball diamonds would not be permitted by the GRCA. Adjustments were made to balance the soil on site by deleting the south ball diamond, shifting a single baseball diamond north while maintaining other park amenities. The current site plan for the Newcastle Community Park is outlined in Figure 1 below. 1.3 In 2020, Council approved a $1,500,000 budget for the construction of Phase 1 of the Newcastle Community Park including illuminated tournament quality sports fields and a skateboard park. The project was funded 90 percent by development charges as it was included in the Municipality’s DC study and is considered a growth-related park. Page 516 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report FSD-029-22 Figure 1: Newcastle Community Park Site Plan 1.4 In May 2020, Public Works completed an Outdoor Recreation Needs Assessment Study (ORNA) to understand and identify the type and number of outdoor recreation facilities that are required in Clarington over the next 15 years. This was completed in response to the significant changes in Clarington’s population and trends in outdoor facility use. The ORNA identified Newcastle as underserviced in both baseball diamonds (currently only one softball diamond) and tennis courts (currently zero facilities). As part of the ORNA action plan, it was recommended to install baseball diamonds, tennis courts and pickleball facilities at the Newcastle Community Park site. Page 517 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FSD-029-22 1.5 In October 2020, Transition Construction was hired through RFP2020-6 Design/Build Services for the design and construction of the Newcastle Skate Park. Construction of the skatepark was completed in Fall of 2021 at an approximate value of $300,000. 1.6 Accounting for all the committed costs mentioned above, there is currently $1,190,000 available for the construction of the remainder of Phase 1. 1.7 In April 2022, tender specifications for the Newcastle Community Park Construction was prepared by the Public Works Department and provided to the Purchasing Services Division. 1.8 Tender CL2022-16 was issued by the Purchasing Services Division and advertised electronically on the Municipality’s website. Notification of the availability of the document was also posted on the Ontario Public Buyer’s Association website. 2. Analysis 2.1 Twenty-four plan takers downloaded the tender document. 2.2 The tender closed on May 27, 2022. 2.3 Two compliant bids were received in response to the tender call and one bid was deemed non-compliant. 2.4 Of the twenty-one companies that downloaded the tender document but chose not to submit pricing: One company is a construction association; One company is a subcontractor; One company is unable to bid competitively; Three companies cannot handle due to present workload; and Fifteen companies did not provide a response. 2.5 The bids were reviewed by the Purchasing Services Division (see Attachment 1). The results were forwarded to the Public Works Department for their review and consideration. 2.6 The cost for the Newcastle Community Park Construction significantly exceeds the allocated budget by $2,387,646.79 (Net HST Rebate) and after review and analysis by Page 518 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report FSD-029-22 the Public Works Department and the Purchasing Services Division there were a number of factors that attributed to this. 2.7 As mentioned in Section 1 of this report, the scope and programming envisioned for the Newcastle Community Park has changed multiple times over the last several years, resulting in the current program which includes illuminated baseball, pickleball and tennis facilities along with a skateboard park, site furnishings, plantings, and pathways. It is Public Works’ opinion that the existing budget was not adequately updated to match the final scope and programming, following public consultation on the needs of the community that is currently included in this Contract. 2.8 Based on the lack of finalized programming information that Public Works staff had at the time of the original budget request, it would be difficult to envision and accurately estimate the expenses related to some of the costly items. These items include earthworks (3.7 times the original estimated cost) and illumination (1.7 times the original estimated cost). 2.9 The construction industry is currently experiencing drastic inflation in all sectors due to material and labour shortages, supply chain issues, international volatile market conditions and most importantly, the severe increase in the price of oil. Public Works has been experiencing this inflation in all aspects of municipal infrastructure projects. In speaking with other local area Municipalities, 20-40% increases are being experienced on construction projects across the Region of Durham. 2.10 After this review and analysis by the Public Works Department and the Purchasing Services Division, staff has outlined their preferred approach to cancel CL2022-16 and retender the Newcastle Community Park Contract for construction in 2023 . Council also has the option to award the contract to the low compliant bidder, Quality Property Services as outlined in this report. Quality Property Services has completed work for the Municipality of Clarington in the past but the recommendation would be to complete a reference check as the previous work was of a lower value than what is being recommended for an award of contract. 3. Financial 3.1 The cost of the Newcastle Community Park Construction exceeds the allocated budget by $2,387,64.79. 3.2 The Newcastle Community Park was included in the 2020 Development Background Study as 100% DC eligible for a total value of $1,200,000 . Additional funding of $300,000 was added with a 90/10 split between DC and Tax Levy to fund the addition of a skateboard park. Page 519 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report FSD-029-22 3.3 Accounting for all the committed costs mentioned in Section 1, there is currently $1,190,000 available for the construction of the remainder of Phase 1. 3.4 It is recommended that estimated additional funds required for the completion of this project be provided from eligible Development Charges Reserve Funds and the Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund at the discretion of the Treasurer. 3.5 The total funds required for this project is $3,962,646.79 (Net HST Rebate), which includes the construction cost of $3,217,520.39 (Net HST Rebate) and other costs including design, material testing, contract administration, permit fees and contingencies in the amount of $745,126.40 (Net HST Rebate). 3.6 Queries with respect to department needs should be referred to the Director of Publi c Works. 4. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Director of Public Works who concurs with the recommendations. 5. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended as noted in Recommendation #2, it is staff’s preferred approach that Tender CL2022-16 be cancelled and reissued in 2023. The other option in Recommendation #3 is to proceed with the award of contract to Quality Property Services being the lowest compliant bidder meeting the terms and conditions of Tender CL2022-16. Should Council approve Recommendation #3, additional funds will be required as the low bid received is substantially over budget. Staff Contact: David Ferguson, Purchasing Manager, (905) 623-3379 x2209 or dferguson@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 – Summary of Bid Results Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 520 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report FSD-029-22 Attachment 1 to Report FSD-029-22 Municipality of Clarington Summary of Bid Results Tender CL2022-16 Newcastle Community Park Construction Bidder Total Bid (Including HST) Total Bid (Net HST Rebate) Quality Property Services $ 3,572,914.74 $ 3,217,520.39 Pine Valley Corporation 3,903,265.21 3,515,011.22 Page 521 Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: General Government Committee Report Number: CAO-004-22 Date of Meeting: June 6, 2022 By-law Number: Reviewed By: Mary-Anne Dempster, CAO Resolution#: File Number: Report Subject: Citizen Centric Ground Floor – Municipal Administrative Centre Recommendations: 1. That Report CAO-004-22 be received for information; and 2. That Council authorize the allocation of the remaining capital budget from account #110-36-370-83601-7401 to facilitate the renovations. Page 522 Municipality of Clarington Page 2 Report CAO-004-22 Report Overview As part of Report CAO-009-21 Council provided staff direction to review recommendations that were set out by the consultants (Customer Service Professional Network) to move Clarington towards establishing a centralized customer service model. The premise of this centralized model was based on work done by Grant Thornton during the organizational review, who opined that this would be the best method of delivering the service, based on the circumstances at that time. As directed, staff have been actively working through the recommendations in Report CAO-009-21 to prepare an implementation report for Council. This report builds on the concept of centralized customer service for both our residents and business partners but deviates in the approach of how to offer the actual services. The new method proposed would see front-line services and the staff associated, physically moved to the ground floor of the Municipal Administrative Centre (MAC). The rationale for this adjustment builds around efforts to mitigate two key risks with the model proposed by the consultants – resources (increased costs) and accountability. Having staff stay accountable to their home department will allow for the appropriate manager to maintain control over the information being given to the public – ensuring it is both timely and accurate. Some renovations will be required to make these adjustments, with the goal to create an enhanced customer service experience for all those visiting the MAC. This will include new public facing counters, accessibility/technology upgrades, and several other customer centric enhancements. 1. Background Audit and Accountability Fund – Grant Thornton LLP and Customer Service Professional Network 1.1 In the first intake of the Province of Ontario’s Audit and Accountability Fund (“AAF”), the Municipality applied for and was successful in obtaining funds to undertake an organizational structure review. As part of that review, Grant Thornton LLP (“GT”), the consultant, recommended that a centralized customer service function be created (see Recommendation #10 in GTs Recommendation and Implementation report). 1.2 In Report CAO-006-20, staff identified a path towards centralization and the need to review all the services that we currently provide to our customers. This would have been a massive undertaking for existing staff, making the second round of the AAF a great opportunity to bring in a third-party customer service expert to undertake this Page 523 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report CAO-004-22 work. Customer Service Professional Network (“CSPN”) was retained for that engagement. 1.3 The final report from CSPN (Report CAO-009-21) set-out a path towards centralization which included several recommendations, but upon further review there is likely a simpler and more cost-effective way that Clarington can accomplish enhanced customer service and realize cost savings. 2. Centralized Customer Service – Implementation Risks 2.1 Upon further review of the CSPN recommendations, there are concerns that our ability to stay lean in terms of human resources may be compromised once this model is fully implemented. The concerns with implementation include: 2.2 Resources – Simply moving FTEs to a centralized department is going to require staff who are already fully utilized to be deployed to a dedicated customer service function. In theory, it sounds more effective. However, staff in the home departments do not just provide customer service. The additional assigned duties will remain, causing capacity issues for the home department to provide services in a timely manner. For example, it was proposed that a Clerk II from Planning and Development could be moved to the centralized department. The job posting for this position (which was recently filled), includes the following tasks that would still need to be fulfilled: Providing clerical support for the preparation of notices of public meetings, notice signs, newsletters and website application summaries, application status letters, and reports to the Planning and Development Committee. Assisting with the processing of Zoning Clearance Letters, Accessory Dwelling Unit registrations, Sign Permits, and Land Division comments. Liaising with the Building Permit Clerks on cross divisional inquiries and providing clerical support to the Development Application Coordinators as needed. Applying the same analysis against the Revenue Clerk position, the following specialized duties would need to be backfilled: Maintenance of Mortgage Company files. Perform collection processes in order to collect outstanding balances. Processing tax roll adjustments such as refunds, payment switches, returned payments, and liens. Assist in preparing and processing tax appeal adjustments such as Municipal Act decisions and post roll amendments. Assist in assessment-based management processes. Page 524 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report CAO-004-22 Ultimately, the proposed model would require additional staff, carrying a cost impact which was not the intent of the exercise. It is anticipated according to the review, that eight full time positions are required to provide the enhanced service at a cost for wages and benefits of $551,281- this does not include the cost of technology and office expenses. It is fair to note that the proposed service contemplated included expanding additional hours of service, however, the need for this was not fully analyzed. There is also the additional consideration related to productivity. If staff are too conservative in responding to questions, it could lead to additional questions simply being escalated to home departments unnecessarily. This would affect productivity and require additional resources within said department to respond. 2.3 Accountability – By moving customer service staff to a centralized manager, it raises concerns regarding chain of control and responsibility for service delivery. For example, if the subject matter expert (“SME”) in Tax is responsible to a customer service manager, how can the home department ensure quality of service? The answer to that is that memorandums of understanding are often drafted between the home department and the manager responsible for the centralized service. This clearly adds a layer of bureaucracy. Furthermore, the centralized model also proposes that departmental subject matter experts assigned to customer service are cross-trained, this increases the chances that incorrect information will be given to residents and business partners. There is some information that is technical and nuanced and it would be very hard to appropriately train people in multiple disciplines. Of course, the centralized function could increase its staff count to add more SMEs, but at a cost. The lines of business provided by a municipality are complex and require a level of training. Under the centralized model, the Director ultimately accountable for the service may be forced to deal with the issue they are not responsible for creating. The public does not distinguish between departments, we are perceived as one business, which when everything is working seamlessly is fine. To illustrate the issue, below are two examples of high-traffic customer facing services from Planning and Development Services and Financial Services, and how enhanced customer service can help residents to avoid error: Comments from Chief Building Official regarding the Ontario Building Code: Not all construction materials that are available to homeowners are code compliant or acceptable on all projects. For example, there are many different types of guards and handrails, some come with engineered designs and are acceptable while others are not engineered and do not meet the OBC design requirements to withstand the loads applied to them and/or are climbable. Helical piles are another example, Home Depot sells a product that can not be used for anything requiring a building permit but they do not inquire about what a purchaser is going to use them for when they sell them. When a Page 525 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report CAO-004-22 Plans Examiner is talking to people who are thinking of using or may consider helical piles or any other product which could be mistakenly used, they explain what can and can’t be used and what to look for when sourcing the product. Most homeowners and even some contractors contact us to discuss their project because they don’t know how to do what they want and are looking to draw on our experience. If a person inquiring about what may be required is not warned or receives the wrong information they may proceed with the wrong materials or methods and jeopardize the safety of the structure and people using it and/or incur increased costs to replace materials and/or rebuild as well as the potential liability on the Municipality. As the scope of projects increases so does the complexity of the OBC requirements, the range of materials available for use, the methods of construction and the risk. Comment from the Director of Planning regarding zoning: Providing the wrong information or a misinterpretation of the information provided can result in the deck being constructed in the wrong location, e.g. too close to the property line or a pool. Comments from the Deputy CAO/Treasurer regarding tax inquiries that could create issues: Not understanding that there is a difference between assessed value and market value and the implications if a purchaser/taxpayer is trying to calculate the tax impact of a purchase Applying tax payments incorrectly to an account could result in added stress and fees, or implications with mortgage covenants. The report set out that staff within the centralized function would be cross-trained, with the assumption that the customer service manager would be responsible for hiring (as vacancies occurred). This would mean that the manager would be set to determine the skills and experience required, which could quickly create gaps for certain departments, depending on what was required to deliver services for their area. 3. Current Context and Opportunities 3.1 As part of our post-pandemic planning, the administrative team is in the process of building a hybrid work model that will see a modernized approach to space use in the MAC. This new model will strategically address the need for any net-new space at the MAC for several years and is both agile and flexible in nature. Page 526 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report CAO-004-22 3.2 It was through this space-focused initiative, our adjusted staffing model, and the need to manage against risks proposed by the recommended centralized customer service model, that this report recommends a deviation from the plan as set out in Report CAO-009-21. What is recommended below builds on the principles of providing high-quality customer service to residents and business partners, while taking a prudent approach to cost management. 4. “Customer Centric” Model – Financial and Human Resource Considerations 4.1 To achieve a first floor that has the appropriate facilities to implement this model there will be the need to undertake capital improvements. Proposed below is an updated approach to how we can achieve an enhanced customer service delivery model on the main floor of the MAC. It draws on bringing services to where the residents are, utilizing current staffing complements and departmental structures, and creating a welc oming environment. 4.2 The Director of Community Services and his staff have been working to determine how to optimize space allocations on the first floor for divisions that deliver front -facing customer service. It is proposed that the current finance area will house Tax and Clerk’s, a component of Planning and Development, and Engineering while the former Purchasing area will house the Building Division. This means that new and redeveloped customer service counters and pathways of travel will be designed to make things easier for everyone. Attachment A showcases the anticipated layout of the ground floor. 4.3 Staff in the Human Resources, Finance and Purchasing divisions who do not provide a customer facing service will be moved to space on the third floor vacated from Planning and Development Services staff. Space needs will be reduced as the hybrid work model will be layered in, with certain staff sharing a workspace, depending on their time spent in office. It is important to note that the Office of the CAO will be drafting a policy that will specifically address return-to-work and space allocation. To help develop the policy, there will be several engagement sessions with staff as well as a workplace satisfaction survey to help ensure we get it right. 4.4 The phone system capabilities will be used to direct callers to the correct business support, if this is not known, there will be a generic option to receive support. At this time, it is not recommended to establish a Clarington call centre as the Region is enhancing their service and potentially offering, on a shared cost basis, the opportunity for municipalities to partner thus significantly decreasing the cost for the Municipality of Clarington to offer this service. This opportunity will be fully explored prior to making any further recommendations with respect to a Clarington Call Centre. Page 527 Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report CAO-004-22 4.5 In 2017, Council approved $1,296,809 for upgrades at the MAC to address accessibility, security, lighting, audio/visual, etc. Of the amount approved, only $1,290,000 was debentured and received. Due to the nature of the projects undertaken and unused contingency, there was $286,000 that went unspent and is available for use to fund the proposed work. Staff advise that the $286,000 be utilized and spent against a list to include: Removal of the customer service counter Renovation work to better utilize existing workspace (wall removal, barrier installation, workspace design with plug-in options, etc.) Technology and wayfinding to improve accessibility for residents which includes LED display screens and signage Tech-enabled meeting room spaces to serve customers (e.g. larger display screens, MS Teams capabilities, upgraded furniture, etc.) 4.7 If costs exceed available funds, Staff will return to Council for approval, but it is anticipated that this phase of implementation will come in under the amount available. 5. Implementation Plan 5.1 Pending Council approval, it is expected that this work could begin quickly, with an anticipated completion date of October 1, 2022. 5.2 The following customer facing services would be available to residents on the main floor of the MAC: Provide Information and Support to General Inquiries / Issues from Public Complaint management resolution tracking Process and Manage Approval of Departmental Permits / Licenses Marriage License, Business Licensing Process and Manage Payments for Various Departmental Services Licenses, Parking Tickets, Parking Permits, and Animal Licenses FOI/MFIPPA Request Complete and Manage Customer Payments of Property Taxes Manage Review & Sign-Off for Zoning / Land-Use Aspect of Permit Approval Process and Manage Approval of Construction Related Permits Deck, Fence, Pool Enclosure, Shed, Sign Page 528 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report CAO-004-22 6. Concurrence 6.1 This report has been reviewed by the Senior Leadership Team, who concur with the recommendations. 7. Conclusion 7.1 A “Citizen-Centric” ground floor at the Municipal Administrative Centre represents the most cost-effective approach and one that aligns staff to deliver on the needs of the public efficiently and effectively. Therefore, it is respectfully recommended that Council approve the allocation of capital budget from account #110-36-370-83601-7401 to facilitate the renovations. Staff Contact: Justin MacLean, Manager, Strategy, Intergovernmental Affairs and Transformation, jmaclean@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 – Rendering of Ground Floor “Citizen-Centric” Wickets Attachment 2 – Rendering of Ground Floor “Citizen-Centric” Service Counter Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 529 Page 530 Attachment 2 to Report CAO-004-22Page 531