HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-269-87DN: 269-87 v C°/
„~a'" .~,Yn11 Uf, .iy
/. ~/~ ,,~
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
REPORT File # ~~,-35~.~~
Res. #~ ';~ ~ ~~-~j:y
By-Law # ~ ,~~j '-
hE~TIN~': General Purpose and Administration Committee
~~~ Monday, October 19, 1987
Rf-POf2T #: p„®~~a_~~ FILE #: ~-~=-6-3---
SUB~CT: REZONING APPLICATION - GERALD & ETHEL BALSON
PART LOT 18, CONCESSION 5, FORMER TWP. OF DARLINGTON
OUR FILE: DEV 87-63
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-26g-87 be received; and
2. THAT the application submitted by Gerald & Ethel Balson to rezone a 0.36
hectare parcel of land located in Part Lot 18, Concession 5, former
Township of Darlington, be denied without prejudice as the proposal does
not conform to the provisions of the Regional Official Plan or the Town
of Newcastle Official Plan.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT:
On August 20, 1987, the Planning Department received an application submitted by
Gerald and Ethel Balson to rezone a parcel of land within Part of Lot 18,
Concession 5, former Township of Darlington to permit the development of two (2)
additional residential lots within the Hamlet of Hampton.
The subject lands are designated "Hamlet" within the Region of Durham Official Plan
and the Town of Newcastle Official Plan. The Regional Plan stipulates that the
predominant use of lands under this designation shall be for residential
development.
...2
iv <~~
REPORT NO.: PD-269-87
PAGE 2
Within Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Town of Newcastle the subject
site is currently zoned "Residential Hamlet (RH)". This zone permits a single
detached dwelling on a lot with a minimum frontage of 30 metres and a minimum
lot area of 3000 square metres, or a lot having a lesser lot area and/or
frontage than required where the lot was legally conveyable prior to the date
of passing of By-law 84-63 (September 10, 1984).
In addition to the above comments, Staff would note, as stated within the Town
of Newcastle Official Plan, raesidential development within a Hamlet may
proceed on the basis of a 0.4 hectare lot. Council may further approve a
reduction only so far as the minimum lot size is not below 0.3 hectares. Any
reduction from 0.4 hectare is based on the submission of an Engineering Report
based on test drilling which confirms the following:
- soil conditions satisfactory for the effective operation of a private
waste disposal system
- no adverse effects upon existing water supplies and an adequate supply
of potable water to service the proposed development; and
- an adequate separation between water table and septic file fields.
In accordance with approved policy, the subject application was circulated to
various agencies and departments for comments. The following is a summary of
comments which have been received. The following departments/agencies had no
objections:
- Town of Newcastle Building Department
- Town of Newcastle Fire Department
- Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority
- Ministry of Agriculture and Food
The Durham Regional Department of Health Services offered the following
comment:
"The above application for rezoning has been investigated by this Health
Department and approval is not recommended as there is insufficient area for
On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems for two (2) residential lots."
The Durham Regional Planning Department commented as follows:
"The subject property is designated "Hamlet" in the Regional Official Plan.
The plan states that development in Hamlets shall be serviced by a private well
and a private waste disposal system approved by the Regional Health Services
Department. ,Since the subject property does not comply with the Health
Services standards, accordingly the Rezoning would not conform to the Region's
Official Plan."
...3
~C~~
REPORT NO.: PD-269-87 PAGE 3
It is noted for the Committee's information that Staff received a letter from a
neighbouring property owner expressing their support of the proposed Zoning
By-law amendment.
It is also noted for the Committee's information that the applicant submitted a
"Geotechnical Investigation Site Suitability Report" prepared by Gibson and
Associates in support of the proposed rezoning. the report concluded that the
proposed land severances will have no negative impact on existing water
supplies. A properly installed and partially raised leaching bed (.45m) and
adequately sealed, drilled well at least 15 metres deep, should ensure
continued availability of existing potable water supplies.
The Report as prepared was based on a total land holdings of 0.51 hectares
(1.25 acres). Staff would note, that upon reviewing the deed of the subject
lands and the assessment information; the property would appear to be 0.36
hectares (0.89 acres). Gibson and Associates, upon being informed of the
difference in lot area, indicated that the reduction in lot area could affect
the results and conclusions of their report.
In consideration of the above-noted comments received from the Durham Health
Department Services and Regional Staff, and the provisions of the Town of
Newcastle Official Plan, Staff are not in a position to support the application
as filed.
Respectfully submitted,
. Ed ds, M.C.I.P.
Director of Planning
PBN~TTE~jip
~Attaeh.
October g, 1987
APPLICANT: Gerald & Ethel Balson
Hampton Post Office
HAMPTON, Ontario
LOB 1J0
Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
-u-~_
~~ ,_
~~~ `~
L~: rence ~,.~ Kotseff
Chief Ada' ~strative Officer
~C®>
~SUUJECT ~-SITE -
LOT 19 LOT 18 LOT I7
.~ ~ ~ ~
~ '
~ -
6 ;:
,~~• ~
~~RH '
.l. ~~ ,~ ~ ,N S~. A-~
~
1 •
1 • SAM. PvE ~,I
_ - . .
:
. ~ . ERR ,;.
'
'I
. H ' . `' ~.
: RH
~G~
z
-. P
A
~ ..~ o~ .~~P
:•~ :~~ o, 5 ; cn
~
w
,
. ~ RHs~
; ~
.
~
;
~' i O
.. ~;2 - ~o
`
i 9Q ~,~.~' ~;
c
~
_
,,
J
a .~
- ~ RH -,
(TAUNTON
. ROAD) ~ ~ REGIONAL ROAD 4 '
~
KEY
P
~ M~4 4 50 fOU 2A0 300m
~~~'
, ~
Dev.87-63
~~~~
--SUBJECT ~~SITE -
LOT 19 LOT. 18 LOT 17
•-
I . ;..
s i
.~ ;i ~N S~• A_ ~ ~
~ ~
1
~ 1 ; ~ SAM:
~ av~~
`~
I - - .
.
-:-
~~
~,~,
-.
ERR - i'
~ -
. ~5 .
t i ~ •
.:
~ H .
~
~:~ ; RH P~G~ ,.
~~~~ ~'`~
Q~~ ~~ ~
Z
o
~
~
~
A~ o, 5
.~~~. ~~~
;
s
~ R W
.
,;
. ' ~ ~
z
RHO o~
'
~ ~ ~~
. ~~.
o
~
~; - ~o ; ~
.i
N . RH ~. N ~ .- H~~
J ~,
.~
~ a
V
V ~ RH
/ ~ ~y~
f
(TAUNTON
.
ROAD) . ~ 1
REGIONAL ROAD 4
~
E
~~ O 50 100 200 300m
54m
Dev.87-63
v Cn~
3nnr3~ tr ,c~d~d
I-{ (uoid a}!S) bL•061 M„OE, SE o5£ N
I . ~+~
* z
o
I ~
tS? tt; C
ti ~ ..s
i c a
o
_
°" I ~~~ z
`
a ~ ~~i
(
w z
W
~
-~ ~
tt ' ~ ` ~' 1
> ~~ a I \
v ( in ~i w ~
~' '
~ to M
~ v
. to ao
• m y • tq q
> I ~ 1~ N Q
N ( ~ ~~~ O
` m ' T\ I `1 ~
Q
UJ..
W C
p Z
Z Z
O W
. ~ ( ~J ~1~ ~' ~
\\, ~ Q ~
f
I
~' ~ ~
W o ;
~
I :~Q ~
~ ~ ~
Q
1
~ !n '~ Q
(O~
~ V
A~M~~~ ~'~~ 'w O
Q O W
Z
~ - - -
~ ~
: l I Q~/
>- l7
O 0:
/y
W 'n ~ ~? uolda~lS),0.09 oa ~ z
---
~ M ~ ~U
3 Z V Q
Q
~ s /~
~tt/I
~ m ~ O J
m nom. ~..
~
~ >-
~ _ ~
~ ~
~- }
}a
z ~
~ ~
"~ " ~~ ~
~
~ wm
a
W ~ a
m o
~
~ ir0 l
1~ o
ate. ~
g ~ a
w
ti ~ c~
zm z
Q
•o ~~
~ to O a a
~ ~ ``~ a ? F°-
o f- ~
W
o ~
~
~ C -~ cn g "
w o
N
O ~ *
• ~
~
v ~
~
' y
~
z ~~
9 Q1Q
Q nos
. ~ ~oo15N'
~
g11 M„ '
OdQ~
~•
Slm,ol
(Wa •wjd-, luold~ol
I-< o N
(UDld a~!S) Ot>O~J 90JnOS 070