Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/17/20111- GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE DATE: October 17, 2011 TIME: 9:30 A.M. PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS 4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING(S) (a) Minutes of a Regular Meeting of. September 26, 2011 4 -1 5. PRESENTATIONS (a) Dave Hardy, Hardy Stevenson & Associates Ltd. and Will McCrae, AECOM, Regarding Report PSD- 083 -11, Refurbishment and Continued Operation of the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station, Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (b) Sheila Hall, Executive Director, Clarington Board of Trade, Regarding the Five Year Business Plan 6. DELEGATIONS (Draft List at Tim- ' eplaced with Final 6 -1 Lis-0 REP�'AGED PGNE� (a) PL LAST PT . �ject Manager, SEE F\N _ Justalnablllty of the New , )ctober, 2011 (b) A _ ,.aCK, Regarding Train Whistle Cessation 7. PUBLIC MEETINGS No Public Meetings 8. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) PSD- 081 -11 Rezoning Application to Facilitate the Severance of Two 8 -1 Residential Lots CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 G. P. &A. Agenda - 2 - October 17, 2011 9. 10 11. 12, 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. (b) PSD- 082 -11 Questions on Energy from Waste (c) PSD- 083 -11 Refurbishment and Continued Operation of the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station Municipality of Clarington Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) EGD -035 -11 Monthly Report on Building Permit Activity for September, 2011 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT No Reports EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) ESD- 014 -11 Monthly Activity -Report —July, August, September 2011 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT No Reports MUNICIPAL CLERK'S DEPARTMENT (a) CLD- 028 -11 Animal Services Quarterly Report — July — September, 2011 CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT (a) COD- 031 -11 CL2011 -28, Bowmanville Valley Pedestrian Bridge & Trail FINANCE DEPARTMENT (a) FND- 022 -11 Account Set -up Manulife Bank of Canada SOLICITOR'S DEPARTMENT No Reports CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE (a) CAO- 009 -11 Clarington Board of Trade Contract Renewal UNFINISHED BUSINESS OTHER BUSINESS ME 9 -1 11 -1 13 -1 14 -1 15 -1 17 -1 G.P. & A. Agenda - 3 - October 17, 2011 20. COMMUNICATIONS 21. CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS 22. ADJOURNMENT Clarh Lending the 1Vay ,My en General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 Minutes of a meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on Monday, September 26, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers. ROLL CALL Present Were: Mayor A. Foster Councillor R. Hooper Councillor M. Novak Councillor J. Neal Councillor W. Partner Councillor C. Traill Councillor W. Woo Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu Facilities Manager, George Acorn Municipal Solicitor, A. Allison Deputy Fire Chief, M. Berney Director of Engineering Services, T. Cannella Director of Planning Services, D. Crome Director of Operations, F. Horvath Director of Corporate Services & Human Resources, M. Marano Director of Finance/Treasurer, N. Taylor Deputy Clerk, A. Greentree' Committee Coordinator, J. Gallagher Mayor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest stated at this meeting. ANNOUNCEMENTS Councillor Partner announced Phoenix Bus Lines has a bus which stops at Orono, Kendal, Newtonville, Newcastle and Bowmanville. It is $10 return or $5 one way. She also attended the Orono Chilli Cook -off on Saturday, September 24, 2011, which raised funds to purchase a flag pole and flag in front of the Orono Town Hall. Councillor Traill attended the 8th Annual Clarington Take Back the Night on Tuesday, September 20, 2011, an event organized by Bethesda House to raise awareness for violence against women. -1- 4 -1 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 Councillor Woo attended Family Safety Day at Fire Station #1 on Saturday, September 24, 2011. He thanked the community partners including Durham Regional Police Service, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Ontario Power Generation and St. Mary's Cement for making it a successful event. Councillor Woo also attended the: • opening of Northglen subdivision development located on Highway #57 in Bowmanville on Saturday, September 24, 2011. • opening of the Longworth Dental office owned by Dr. Sharon Barr on Sunday, September 25, 2011. • retirement party for Reverend Joe LaFave, from Trinity United Church on Sunday, September 25, 2011. Councillor Hooper awarded a certificate, on behalf of Mayor and Council, to Alden Pinky Hubbard on Saturday, September 24, 2011 in honour of his 90th birthday. He also attended the Clarington Eagles hockey team home opener on Sunday, September 25, 2011. Councillor Hooper reminded everyone that Applefest will take place on Saturday, October 15, 2011 and that the Newcastle Fall Festival takes place on Saturday, October 1, 2011. Councillor Neal attended the Wellness Centre re- opening on Saturday September 24, 2011 as well as the Northglen subdivision grand opening and the Orono Chilli Cook -off, Councillor Novak attended the following events: • Bethesda House 'Take Back the Night' event on Tuesday, September 20, 2011 • "Who's Your Caddy 2nd Annual All Ladies Golf Tournament" held at Whitevale Golf Club in Pickering on September 22, 2011 to raise funds for the "Image is Everything MRI Campaign for Rouge Valley Ajax Pickering Hospital" • Regional Long -Term Service Award Dinner on Thursday, September 22, 2011 • Wellness Centre Re- opening on Saturday September 24, 2011 • Northglen subdivision grand opening • Family Safety Day at Fire Station #1 on Saturday, September 24, 2011 • Twist and Shout campaign which included Catholic Family Services of Durham, Durham Region Intimate Violence Empowerment Network, and Rose of Durham on Tuesday, September 20, 2011. The campaign is intended to raise funds to renovate a local building and offer one -stop shopping for their clients. Mayor Foster informed the Committee that he has received a letter from the producers of the Crown Royal advertisement who where recently filming in Bowmanville. The letter stated that Bowmanville was selected because of its friendly people, vibrant and pretty downtown core. He announced that a group of young persons have raised over $900 from a bottle drive to go towards the construction of a new skateboard park in Hampton. Mayor Foster added that MinCom Millennium Realty Inc. Brokerage, Halminen Homes and the Gay Company Ltd. donated $20,000 for the skateboard park. Mayor Foster noted that the recently released Region of Durham report regarding -2- 4 -2 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 building activity indicated that the average cost of single detached homes has decreased, but that prices in Clarington have increased. He noted that the construction of sanitary sewers on Highway #2 in Courtice has begun. Mayor Foster thanked those who donated to the Feed the Need Durham event held on Thursday, September 22, 2011 in the cenotaph area outside the Municipal Administrative Centre. He reminded everyone that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Council hearings for the Port Granby project will begin on Tuesday, September 27, 2011 at Hope Fellowship. MINUTES Resolution #GPA- 568 -11 Moved by Councillor Partner, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT the minutes of the regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration Committee held on September 12, 2011, be approved. CARRIED Councillor Neal noted that he had a pecuniary interest in the Closed Session minutes for the General Purpose and Administration Committee meeting of September 12, 2011. PRESENTATIONS Sheila Hall, Executive Director, Clarington Board of Trade (CBOT), presented an Economic Development Update to the Committee. She made a verbal presentation to accompany a PowerPoint presentation. Ms. Hall updated the Committee on the economic development activity in Clarington since the last update in March, 2011. Her update included: number of leads, new businesses, new employees, business relocations, business closures, retention initiatives, and attractions. Ms. Hall noted that in January 2012, Canada Rubber will be relocated from Oshawa to 405 Lake Road, Bowmanville, a 50,0000 ftz facility. She reminded the Committee of the CBOT's involvement in the nuclear supply chain including an announcement for the joint review panel. recommendations, the ground breaking for the Darlington Energy Complex, a proximity map, the Organization of CANDU Industry survey, Canadian Nuclear Association, and building relationships. Ms. Hall reviewed a list of 26 new members of the CBOT. She highlighted some of the events which the CBOT was involved in since March, 2011. Ms. Hall talked about the special projects that the CBOT is involved in, including a business plan, economic development tools website, developing a marketing strategy, the Familiarization Tour, and the `Developing Clarington' Focus Group. She provided the Committee with a list of partners with the CBOT. Ms. Hall also reported that the efforts on physician recruitment have successfully resulted in 52 of 56 physician positions being filled. -3- 4 -3 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 DELEGATIONS Jim Boate was present regarding cycling in the Municipality. He made a verbal presentation to accompany a PowerPoint presentation and handout. Mr. Boate informed the Committee that he was a member of the Beech Street Spinners, but that he wanted to discuss the broader issue of cycling in Clarington. He noted that Clarington has some of the best cycling trails in Ontario. Mr. Boate provided the Committee with some details of the main trails: Moraine Ridges, country roads and the waterfront trail. On behalf of the cycling group, he stated that he wished to offer a formal ongoing feedback process regarding maintenance, signs, connecting corridors, temporary detours, and long -range route plans. Mr. Boate requested that the Municipality place cycling information signs on the waterfront trail. He asked permission to establish a bike friendly committee to work with the Tourism Department to develop a bicycle friendly tourism map which would show routes to area villages, distances, challenge ratings, accommodations, refreshment locations, etc. Mr. Boate informed the Committee that there are large bike groups which come from outside the community to Clarington and he further stated that he would like to increase this awareness. He suggested that the proposed bike friendly advocacy committee could establish a master plan for bikes and pedestrians, identify bike friendly routes and work with Durham Region and their Regional Cycling Plan. Mr. Boate extended an invitation to Council members to join the bike group on a bicycle ride. He added that his group has some funds to donate toward the erection of a two signs entering Clarington on the waterfront trail to provide increased cycling information. RECESS Resolution #GPA- 569 -11 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Neal THAT the Committee recess for 10 minutes. CARRIED The meeting resumed at 11:08 a.m. DELEGATION OF JIM BOATE REGARDING CYCLING IN CLARINGTON Resolution #GPA- 570 -11 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT the delegation of Mr. Jim Boate regarding cycling in Clarington be referred to Staff; and 4 -4 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 THAT Mr. Jim Boate be thanked for his delegation. CARRIED ALTER THE AGENDA Resolution #GPA -571 -11 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT the agenda be altered to consider Sheila Hall's presentation at this time. CARRIED PRESENTATION OF SHEILA HALL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CLARINGTON BOARD OF TRADE, REGARDING AN ECONOMIC UPDATE Resolution #GPA- 572 -11 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT the presentation of Sheila Hall, Executive Director, Clarington Board of Trade regarding an economic development update, be received with thanks. CARRIED Councillor Novak chaired this portion of the meeting. PUBLIC MEETING There were no public meetings held. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 Resolution #GPA- 573 -11 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report PSD- 079 -11 be received; THAT Council concurs with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on September 15, 2011 for applications A2011 -0029 and A2011 -0030; and -5- 4 -5 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment. CARRIED OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW RELEASE OF INTENSIFICATION DISCUSSION PAPER Resolution #GPA- 574 -11 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report PSD- 080 -11 be received for information. CARRIED PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULE REVIEW Resolution #GPA- 575 -11 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Staff prepare a report regarding the possibility of holding Public Meetings during the evening; and THAT the report include the possibility of altering the order of the agenda at General Purpose and Administration to hear delegations before presentations. CARRIED Councillor Traill chaired this portion of the meeting. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT ON BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY FOR AUGUST, 2011 Resolution #GPA- 576 -11 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report EGD- 034 -11 be received for information. CARRIED Councillor Woo chaired this portion of the meeting. SOM 4 -6 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT SPECIAL WASTE COLLECTION EVENTS Resolution #GPA- 577 -11 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report OPD- 013 -11 be received for information. CARRIED EMERGENCY AND FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. Councillor Neal chaired this portion of the meeting. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT NEWCASTLE & DISTRICT RECREATION COMPLEX — CONCESSION OPERATION EXPRESSION OF INTEREST Resolution #GPA- 578 -11 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report CSD- 013 -11 be received for information. CARRIED AS AMENDED (See following motion) Resolution #GPA- 579 -11 Moved by Councillor Traill, seconded by Councillor Partner THAT the foregoing resolution #GPA- 578 -11 be amended to add the following as a second clause: "THAT staff be directed to reissue the Expression of Interest for the concession operation at the Newcastle and District Recreation Complex and open it up to private sector service providers." CARRIED The foregoing Resolution #GPA- 578 -11 was then put to a vote and carried as amended. 7- 4 -7 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 DARLINGTON SOCCER CLUB — BOWMANVILLE INDOOR SOCCER FACILITY CONCESSION OPERATION Resolution #GPA- 580 -11 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report CSD- 014 -11 be received; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report CSD -014 -11 be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED CUSTOMER SERVICE WEEK Resolution #GPA- 581 -11 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Mayor Foster THAT Report CSD- 015 -11 be received; and THAT October 1 -7, 2011 be declared Customer Service Week at Clarington Recreation Facilities. CARRIED AS AMENDED (See following motions) Resolution #GPA- 582 -11 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Partner THAT the foregoing resolution #GPA- 581 -11 be amended by adding the following: "THAT the Community Services Department investigate the opportunity to provide events during Customer Service Week at the Orono Arena." CARRIED AS AMENDED (See following motion) : General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 Resolution #GPA- 583 -11 Moved by Councillor Partner, seconded by Mayor Foster THAT the foregoing resolution #GPA- 582 -11 be amended by adding the following: "THAT the Community Services Department request the participation of the Orono and Newcastle Arenas to participate in the 2011 Customer Service Week; and THAT if accepted, Customer Service Week be extended by one day." CARRIED The foregoing Resolution #GPA- 582 -11 was then put to a vote and carried as amended. The foregoing Resolution #GPA- 581 -11 was then put to a vote and carried as amended. RECESS Resolution #GPA- 584 -11 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Partner THAT the Committee recess for 1 hour. CARRIED The meeting resumed at 1:45 p.m. Councillor Partner chaired this portion of the meeting. CLERK'S DEPARTMENT APPOINTMENTS TO ENERGY FROM WASTE — WASTE MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Resolution #GPA- 585 -11 Moved by Councillor, seconded by Councillor Neal THAT the Committee move into closed session in accordance with Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, to discuss a matter that deals with personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees. MOTION WITHDRAWN 4 -9 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 Resolution #GPA- 586 -11 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT Report CLD- 025 -11 be received; THAT the following four people be appointed to the Energy From Waste — Waste Management Advisory Committee: • Marven Whidden • Kathy Coupland • Michelle Speelman Viney • Sophia Wouters and THAT all interested parties listed in Report CLD- 025 -11 be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED LATER IN THE MEETING (See following motions) Resolution #GPA- 587 -11 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Traill THAT the foregoing Resolution #GPA- 586 -11 be divided to consider the appointment of Marven Whidden separately from: Kathy Coupland, Michelle Speelman Viney, and Sophia Wouters." MOTION LOST Resolution #GPA- 588 -11 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Traill THAT the foregoing Resolution #GPA- 586 -11 be amended to delete the word "appointed" in paragraph 2 and replace it with the word "nominated "; and THAT the process be amended to allow each Council Member to appoint up to four nominees and Members vote for their preferred four nominees from the list, with the four applicants with the most votes being nominated. MOTION LOST The foregoing Resolution #GPA -586 -11 was then put to a vote and carried. -10- 4 -10 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 PROPOSED FORTIFICATION BY -LAW Resolution #GPA- 589 -11 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Traill THAT Report CLD- 026 -11 be received; THAT the By -law attached to Report CLD- 026 -11 be approved; and THAT all interested parties listed in Report CLD- 026 -11 be advised of Council's decision. CARRIED LATER IN THE MEETING (See following motions) CLOSED SESSION Resolution #GPA- 590 -11 Moved by Mayor Foster, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT in accordance with Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, the meeting be closed for the purpose of hearing the advice of the Municipal Solicitor regarding Report CLD- 026 -11, being a matter which is subject to solicitor - client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose. CARRIED RISE AND REPORT The meeting resumed in open session at 2;50 p.m. with Councillor Partner in the Chair. Councillor Partner advised that one item was discussed in "closed" session in accordance with Section 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001 and no resolutions were passed. - 11 - 4 -11 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 PROPOSED FORTIFICATION BY -LAW - Continued Resolution #GPA- 591 -11 Moved by Councillor Trail[, seconded by Councillor Neal THAT the foregoing Resolution #GPA- 589 -11 be amended to delete the following sections from the proposed by -law attached to Report CLD- 026 -11: ® 8(2) (f) an observation tower designed to enable a visual observation of surrounding areas beyond the perimeter of the land whether the tower is occupied by an individual or a surveillance camera or like equipment • 9(2) (c) visual surveillance equipment, including video cameras, night vision systems, or electronic surveillance devices capable of permitting either stationary or scanned viewing or listening beyond the perimeter of the land MOTION LOST The foregoing Resolution #GPA- 589 -11 was then put to a vote and carried. Mayor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT USE OF CORPORATE LOGO BY MEMBERS OF COUNCIL Resolution #GPA- 592 -11 Moved by Councillor Woo, seconded by Councillor Novak THAT Report COD -030 -11 be received; and THAT the policy attached to Report COD - 030 -11, defining the use of the Corporate Logo by Members of Council, be approved. CARRIED -12- 4 -12 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 FINANCE DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES PROGRAM — 2010 Resolution #GPA -593 -11 Moved by Councillor Neal, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT Report FND- 019 -11 be received for information. CARRIED TAX WRITE -OFFS UNDER SECTION 354(2)(b), 354(4)(b), & 353(3) OF THE MUNICIPAL ACT, 2001 Resolution #GPA -594 -11 Moved by Councillor Hooper, seconded by Councillor Neal THAT Report FND- 020 -11 be received; THAT the amount stated in Sentence 1 of Section 3.1 be corrected from $94,460.08 to $86,954.21 to reflect the amount stated in Attachment "A" of FND- 020 -11; and THAT the Treasurer be authorized, under Section 354(2)(b), 354(4)(b), & 353(3) of the Municipal Act 2001 to write -off taxes as uncollectible and charge back the proportionate amounts to the Region of Durham and the School Boards for those properties listed in Attachment "A" to Report FND- 020 -11. CARRIED LIST OF APPLICATIONS FOR CANCELLATION, REDUCTIONS, APPORTIONMENTS OR REFUND OF TAXES Resolution #GPA- 595 -11 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT Report FND- 021 -11 be received; and THAT the list, attached to Report FND -021 -11, of applications for cancellation, reduction, apportionments or refund of taxes, be approved. CARRIED -13- 4 -13 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 SOLICITOR'S DEPARTMENT There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There were no reports to be considered under this section of the Agenda. OTHER BUSINESS Councillor Hooper announced that Mr. Dan Carter, Executive Producer of Channel 12, and a Clarington resident, has been recognized as Business Person of the Year by the Greater Oshawa Chamber of Commerce. Councillor Woo informed the Committee that Mr. Horvath has confirmed that car batteries will be accepted at the upcoming Household Hazardous Waste Event on October 1, 2011. Councillor Woo also announced that Bowmanville Veterinary Clinic will be hosting a fundraising event for the Humane Society of Durham on October 1, 2011. INCLUDING OTHER FACILITIES IN CUSTOMER SERVICE WEEK Resolution #GPA- 596 -11 Moved by Councillor Partner, seconded by Councillor Woo THAT the Community Services Department advise the Newcastle Arena Board and the Orono Arena Board, and other appropriate Boards of Council of municipal wide events, such as `Customer Service Week', such that they may, at their will, have the opportunity to participate in these events. CARRIED COMMUNICATIONS There were no items considered under this section of the Agenda -14- 4 -14 General Purpose and Administration Committee Minutes September 26, 2011 CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS There were no items considered under this section of the Agenda. ADJOURNMENT Resolution #GPA- 597 -11 Moved by Councillor Novak, seconded by Councillor Hooper THAT the meeting adjourn at 3:23 p.m. MAYOR -15- DEPUTY CLERK 4 -15 Attachment #1 of Update Memo FINAL LIST OF DELEGATIONS GPA Meeting: October 17, 2011 (a) Frank Perri, AVP Construction and Rob Simpson, Project Manager, Canadian Tire Corporation, Regarding the Sustainability of the New Canadian Tire Store Opening October, 2011 7r7-r. �s 1 L , _14-0; ►. Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: October 17, 2011 Resolution #: By -law #: Report#: PSD- 081 -11 File #: ZBA2011 -0004 Subject: REZONING APPLICATION TO FACILITATE THE SEVERANCE OF TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: THAT Report PSD- 081 -11 be received; 2. THAT the recommendations contained in the Environmental Impact Study and Addendum prepared by Niblett Enviornmental Associates Inc., August 2011, be received; 3. THAT the rezoning application submitted by Zlatko and Starleane Jazic be approved and that the attached Zoning By -law Amendment (Attachment 3) be adopted by Council; 4. THAT a copy of this Report and Council's decision be forwarded to the Region of Durham Planning Department and the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC); and 5. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD- 081 -11 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 -- °`? Submitted by: Da 'd . Crome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services TW /CP /df 3 October 2011 Reviewed by: CY Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer REPORT NO.: PSD -081 -11 PAGE 3 1. APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant/Owner: Zlatko and Starleane Jazic 1.2 Proposal: to rezone the lands to an appropriate zone to facilitate the severance of two (2) residential lots with 15 metre lot frontages. 1.3 Area: 0.609 ha (1.5 acres) 1.4 Location: 3327 Trulls Road, Courtice (see Attachment 1) 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 On February 9, 2011, Zlatko and Starleane Jazic submitted an application to rezone their property to facilitate the severance of two residential lots. The application was incomplete as an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) must be completed in accordance with the Clarington Official Plan policies. Staff, in consultation with the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority prepared a Terms of Reference which was forwarded to the EIS consultant on the municipal roster. A proposal was submitted by Niblett Environmental Associates Inc. on February 25th and by March 7th, the applicant, staff and CLOCA had agreed to the terms of the proposal. Funds to secure the completion of the EIS were submitted by the applicant on March 25th which allowed staff to deem the application complete. 2.2 Niblett Environmental Associates Inc. completed the EIS in August. After review of the document by the applicant and relevant departments and agencies, an addendum letter was provided on September 21, 2011 to address minor edits. 3. LAND CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES 3.1 The subject property contains a single detached dwelling on a large residential lot. There is a man -made pond at the east end of the property which is within a valley. The Harmony - Farewell Iroquois Beach Provincially Significant Wetland Complex is located on a portion of the east end of the subject property. 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North - large lot residential and a recently registered subdivision on Vivian Drive with lot frontages of 12, 13.5 and 15 metres South - large lot residential and the former Courtice Fire Station site which has been severed into four 15 metre residential lots. East - Municipally.owned Open Space West 12 metre wide residential lots •' • '�l 4. PROVINCIAL POLICY 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) promotes opportunities for intensification, including infilling, where it can be accommodated. The availability of suitable existing or planned infrastructure and public service facilities required to accommodate projected needs must be taken into account. Planning authorities are required to provide for a range of housing types and densities. A ten year supply of designated residential lands and a three year supply of residentially zoned and serviced lands are required. Development and site alteration shall not be permitted on lands adjacent to significant natural heritage features unless the ecological function of those natural heritage features has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts. The application is consistent with the 2005 Provincial Policy Statement. 4.2 Provincial Growth Plan The Provincial Growth Plan directs growth to built -up areas where the capacity exists to best accommodate the expected population. The guiding principles include building compact, vibrant and complete communities while optimizing the use of existing and new infrastructure to support growth in a compact efficient form. As the application for zoning amendment is within the built boundary, it conforms to the Provincial Growth Plan. 5. OFFICIAL PLANS 5.1 Durham Regional Official Plan The Durham Regional Official Plan designates the property Living Area with an indication of Key Natural Heritage and Hydrologic Features. Lands designated Living Area are to be used predominantly for housing with a wide variety of types, sizes and tenure. Intensification of existing areas is encouraged. The natural environment, including Key Natural Heritage and Hydrologic Features shall be given paramount consideration in light of their ecological functions and scientific, educational and health values. 5.2 Clarington Official Plan The property is designated Urban Residential and Environmental Protection Area in the Clarington Official Plan. The predominant use of lands designated Urban Residential shall be for housing purposes. The property has frontage on Trulls Road North, which is identified as a Type B Arterial road. Type B Arterial roads are designed to move significant volumes of traffic and have a right -of -way width ranging from 30 to 36 metres. REPORT NO.: PSD -081 -11 PAGE 5 Environmental Protection Areas are recognized as the most significant components of the Municipality's natural environment. As such, these areas and their ecological functions are to be preserved and protected from the effects of human activity. The precise limits of these areas are to be determined in consultation with the Conservation Authority. Map C — Natural Heritage System identifies the property as being within the Lake Iroquois Beach and is adjacent to a wetland, significant valleylands, and a tributary of Farewell Creek. The wetland is part of the Harmony - Farewell Iroquois Beach Provincially Significant Wetland. An Environmental Impact Study (EIS) is required to be undertaken for development applications in accordance with the Natural Environment and Resource Management policies of the Official Plan. 6.1 Within Comprehensive Zoning By -Law 84 -63, as amended, the subject lands are located within the "Agricultural (A)" and "Environmental Protection (EP)" zones. An amendment is required in order to facilitate the severance of two lots for single detached dwellings as the "Agricultural (A)" zoning is not consistent with the Urban Residential land use designation. 7. SUMMARY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY 7.1 The Environmental Impact Study (EIS) confirmed the Harmony - Farewell Iroquois Beach Provincially Significant Wetland boundary and recommended that a 30 metre buffer be applied to it to protect its features and hydrologic functions. The EIS determined that there is no defined top of bank in this reach of the valley. The 30 metre buffer will encompass the entire valleylands on the property. The proposed severance line shall not extend into that buffer area.. No rare wildlife species were found on site. Numerous amphibians were found; the buffer area will maintain their habitat. By preserving the valleylands, wetlands and woodlands, on the property, the wildlife corridor provided by the Farewell Creek valley will be further protected. 7.2 The EIS concluded that the creation of the two new lots will not have a significant impact on the Harmony - Farewell Iroquois Beach Provincially Significant Wetland, Lake Iroquois Beach formation, woodlands and significant valley lands provided the following mitigation measures and recommendations are implemented: ® A 30m buffer be implemented from the wetland as shown on Attachment 2. This will encompass the significant wetland and significant valleyland; The eastern boundary of future lots be located outside of the 30m buffer area; This line should be surveyed and clearly delineated on the ground with stakes; ® Silt and snow fence should be installed and maintained along the development of the eastern boundary defined by the buffer from the wetland and EP area, prior to any site preparation activities. This line should be surveyed and staked in the field prior to any site preparation activities; '• • . 1 m1 • Grading of the site and removal or addition of fill be restricted to the area outside the setback fencing and buffer. Functioning sediment control measures must be in place prior to and during the construction phase, and remain in place until all bare or exposed soils have become stabilized (i.e. vegetated); Stockpiling of material (stored or excavated), placing of stumps or any other works shall not be permitted within the buffer of the wetland and EP; and Roof leaders should outlet onto grassed surfaces or into soakaway pits to maintain infiltration. 8. PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS 8.1 A statutory Public Meeting was held on May 9, 2011. No one spoke in opposition to the proposal. Two inquiries requesting further details on the application were received. No objections were expressed. 9. AGENCY COMMENTS 9.1 The application was circulated to the appropriate departments and agencies for comment. 9.2 The Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board has no concerns or objections with the proposed application. 9.3 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority ( CLOCA) advises that the entire property is within an area that is subject to CLOCA's Ontario Regulation 42/06 Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses. As such, a permit from CLOCA is required prior to any development activity, including site grading, occurring on the property. The property contains a number of natural heritage features including a tributary of Farewell Creek, an online pond, a wetland area identified by CLOCA as an Ecological Land Classification (ELC) wetland, as well as a portion of a Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW). With respect to the tributary of Farewell Creek which traverses the eastern portion of the property, CLOCA has identified the extent of potential flooding associated with this section of the creek. The floodplain extends onto the property to the west of the existing pond. The floodplains of watercourses are considered to be hazard lands. CLOCA, in support of Provincial Policy, directs development to be located outside of hazard lands. The south eastern section of the subject property contains a portion of the Provincially Significant Harmony Farewell Iroquois Beach Wetland. Provincial Policy indicates that no development is permitted within Provincially Significant Wetlands (PSW) and further that any development adjacent to (within 120 metres of) a PSW is not permitted unless REPORT NO.: PSD- 081 -11 the lands have been evaluated and it can be demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or their ecological function. PAGE 7 CLOCA agrees with the conclusions and recommendations as outlined within the Environmental Impact Study and the Addendum document and would therefore have no objections to the approval of the zoning by -law amendment to permit the creation of two additional residential lots. 9.4 The Region of Durham Planning Department indicated that Trulls Road is designated as a Type `B' Arterial Road. As per Provincial and Regional policy, a noise impact study will be required to address potential noise impacts and identify appropriate mitigation measures. The applicant shall implement any mitigation measures identified in the report, and any warning clauses shall be included in a development agreement with the Municipality of Clarington to the satisfaction of the Durham Regional Planning Department. The Region will impose this requirement through the land division application process. The subject lands have been determined to have Archaeological potential. An Archaeological Assessment submitted to the Ministry of Culture is required. No demolition, grading or other soil disturbances shall take place on the subject property prior to the Ministry of Culture confirming that all archaeological resource concerns have been met including licensing and resource conservation requirements. The Region will apply this requirement through the Land Division process. The Region has advised that they are satisfied with the recommendations contained in the Environmental Impact Study and subsequent addendum submitted by Niblett Environmental Associates Inc. The Health Department has no objection to the proposed application, on condition that both the retained and severed lots are serviced by municipal water and sanitary sewers. There are existing watermain and sanitary sewer services abutting the frontage of the subject lands, however 3327 Trulls Road North is only connected to the Regional water system. As conditions of the future severance the applicant will be require to connect the existing property to the municipal sanitary sewer system and pay the sanitary sewer frontage charges on the entire 60.29 metre frontage of the existing property. The applicant would be required to pay sanitary sewer and water supply connections; and water frontage charges for the newly created lots. 10. STAFF COMMENTS 10.1 The proposed infilling is consistent with the surrounding neighbourhood. The proposed lots are similar to the four lots created by the Municipality on the former Fire Hall lands to the south. The recently registered subdivision on Vivian Drive also contains a number of 15 metre lots. WOM REPORT NO.: PSD- 081 -11 PAGE 8 10.2 The Environmental Impact Study and Addendum prepared by Niblett Environmental Associates has been completed to the satisfaction of Clarington Planning, the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority and the Region of Durham. 10.3 In light of the findings of the EIS it is appropriate to permit the proposed residential use outside of the proposed 30 metre buffer. The remaining EIS recommendations will be implemented through an agreement which will be a condition of the future land division application to create the proposed lots. The lands zoned 'Environmental Protection (EP)' must be transferred to the Municipality as the valleylands had been identified for acquisition by the 2000 Council adopted Land Acquisition Strategy. This will be imposed as a condition, by the Municipality, during the consent process. 10.4 The proposed Zoning By -law Amendment contains an exemption to Section 3.21 b) of the General Provisions which would require a setback of 3 metres to the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. The intention of this section is to provide an additional buffer between sensitive lands and development. However, since the lands proposed to be zoned EP contain a 30 metre buffer as recommended by the EIS, the additional 3 metre buffer is not necessary. 10.5 Clarington Emergency Services have no concerns or objections with the proposed application. 10.6 Clarington Engineering Services has no objection, in principle, to the proposed zoning change. A servicing plan satisfactory to the Director of Engineering Services will be required to obtain approval for any future land severance application. 11. CONCURRENCE - Not applicable 12. CONCLUSION 12.1 The application has been reviewed in consideration of comments received from the circulated agencies, the policies of the Clarington Official Plan and the Zoning By -law regulations. In consideration of the comments contained in this report, Staff respectfully recommends that the proposed Zoning By -law Amendment contained in Attachment 3 be approved. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Tracey Webster Attachments: Attachment 1 - Key Map Attachment 2 - Recommended 30 metre Buffer from the Environmental Impact Study dated August, 2011 Attachment 3 - Zoning By -law Amendment REPORT NO.: PSD- 081 -11 List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Zlatko and Starleane Jazic Nick Palladino Scott Jeffery Steve McPhee PAGE 9 • Attachment 1 To Report PSD- 081 -11 i l Attachment 2 Attachment 3 To Report PSD -081 -11 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON BY -LAW NO. 2011- being a By -law to amend By -law 84 -63, the Comprehensive Zoning By -law for the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of.the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By -law 84 -63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA 2011 -0004; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Section 12.4.1 "SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS — URBAN RESIDENTIAL TYPE ONE (R1) ZONE" is hereby amended by introducing a new Subsection 12.4.85 as follows: "12.4.85 URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION (R1 -85) ZONE" Notwithstanding Section 3.21 a) those lands zoned R1 -85 as shown on Schedule "A" attached to this By -law shall be subject to the following zone regulations: a) Setback from the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone (minimum) 0 metres 2. Schedule "4" to By -law 84 -63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designations from: "Urban Residential Type One (R1) Zone" to "Urban Residential Exception (R1- 85) Zone "; and "Environmental Protection (EP) Zone" to "Urban Residential Exception (R1 -85) Zone" as illustrated.on the attached Schedule "A" hereto. 3. Schedule "A" attached hereto shall form part of this By -law. 4. This By -law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act. BY -LAW read a first time this - day of 2011 BY -LAW read a second time this day of 2011 BY -LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2011 Adrian Foster, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk, 8 -12 This is schedule "A" to By-law 2011- , passed this day of , 2011 A.D. inn rrii3rr:3i3i = /�T I lr_iY a_�� -- � ........................ Iilnuliaul __ = vi►� = /�� � _ _ = = � //I19,u1:11r �� �_ � � _ , , _� �_ =_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIi � •° �- == -O MIIIII�_ m c ilitRi331ai1[ . — o __ IIE!IIlIIIIIII � 1! alit � -_ `� = .-�� 111111111111 III �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN,�� c"1 = IIOIIIiI -� a%� '�, ���- �. • �o eFi ePi7..711e3:��I ���I\,i /� Iti�1111111�3 ;3;SIi'll1 \ \� /IIIIIID�� - �� � = I � � � , Hi 8 -13 is N N ® Zoning Change From "A" To "R1 -85" ® Zoning Change From "EP" To "R1 -85" Zoning To Remain "EP" Adrian Foster, Mayor Patti L. Barrie, Municipal Clerk inn rrii3rr:3i3i = /�T I lr_iY a_�� -- � ........................ Iilnuliaul __ = vi►� = /�� � _ _ = = � //I19,u1:11r �� �_ � � _ , , _� �_ =_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIi � •° �- == -O MIIIII�_ m c ilitRi331ai1[ . — o __ IIE!IIlIIIIIII � 1! alit � -_ `� = .-�� 111111111111 III �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN,�� c"1 = IIOIIIiI -� a%� '�, ���- �. • �o eFi ePi7..711e3:��I ���I\,i /� Iti�1111111�3 ;3;SIi'll1 \ \� /IIIIIID�� - �� � = I � � � , Hi 8 -13 ZIA U01 Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: October 17, 2011 Resolution #: By -law #: Report#: PSD- 082 -11 File #: PLN 33.3.10 Subject: QUESTIONS ON ENERGY FROM WASTE RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD- 082 -11 be received for information. Submitted by: David J. Crome, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Services DJC /sn 6 October 2011 Reviewed by: anklin Wu, ` Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 REPORT NO.: PSD -082 -11 INTRODUCTION On October 3, 2011 Council received a letter from Melodee Smart forwarding copies of the Noise Monitoring Plan, the Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Plan and the EA Draft Compliance Reporting. Council unanimously adopted resolution #C- 433 -11: THAT Correspondence Item I — 5 from Melodee Smart, Administrative Assistant, Works Department, Regional Municipality of Durham, with respect to the DurhamNork Energy From Waste Project be referred to staff to. respond to the following questions: • Will ICI Waste be accepted or not? • Will the Monitoring Program Records be public records and be available to staff or Members of Council? ® Is there a prescribed limit for PM2.5 and PM 10 contaminants? 2. STAFF RESPONSE Question 1: Will ICI Waste be accepted or not? The Certificate of Approval which states that the operation of the EFW site is limited to: ® Domestic waste and Industrial, Commercial and Institutional waste from the Region's curb -side collection and /or from the Region's waste management facilities; and ® Waste generated on -site through activities not related to the handling and processing of waste [i.e. office, lunchroom, etc.] This matter was raised following the April 11, 2011 EFWAC meeting. In response it was noted that the regions are responsible for waste and diversion collection services from a limited number of small businesses, predominantly retail outlets [small waste generators] in downtown business districts. The curb -side collection from these locations affords these businesses the same diversion opportunities offered to the residential sector. Regional staff monitor, set out, educate and encourage the small businesses to participate in the various waste diversion programs. Once the Region's new waste management by -law is approved, it will be mandatory for these businesses to participate in the diversion programs or risk possible loss of the service. Question 2 : Will the Monitoring Program Records be public records and be available to staff or Members of Council? All emissions monitoring records will be public records. The Region committed to posting them on a public website and it will be linked directly to the Region's webpage. 8 -15 REPORT NO.: PSD- 082 -11 PAGE 3 All monitoring plans and records will be available to Clarington Council and municipal staff. The Region has indicated that they could be provided upon request if they cannot find them on the public posting sites. It would be appropriate for the Region provide to Council as a minimum for the Annual Report. Some of the requirements under the various approvals and /or agreement are as follows: Under Section 15 of the Environmental Assessment ® Reporting - all reports go to Energy from Waste Advisory Committee (EFWAC) and are posted. Under Section 16 of the Certificate of Approval • Copies of all monitoring reports submitted to the Ministry of the Environment are to be made available to the public (either on -line or available for inspection at the facility) • The owners shall ensure access to the on -line, real -time of the operating parameter data Under the Host Community Agreement • Section 2.1 Information on the monitoring of the facility is to go to the Energy from Waste - Waste Management Advisory Committee (EFW -WMAC) • Section 3.3 Information on monitoring is to be made available to the public on the website or an on -site message board Question 3: Is there a prescribed limit for PM2.5 and PM 10 contaminants? There are no separately prescribed emission limits for PM 2.5 and PM 10; rather they are collectively a part of total particulate matter. Schedule C of the Certificate of Approval for the Durham York EFW sets an operating limit of 9 mg /Rm3 (weight or mass) for "Total Suspended Particulate Matter. (filterable particulate measured in accordance with the Ontario Source Testing Code) ". The Ontario Source Testing Code Version 3 (Method ON -5) standard was recently revised and contained within it is the definition of particulate matter: "Particulate matter refers to any filterable material, with an aerodynamic diameter between 441im and 0.3pm, that maintains its solid state properties at 120 degrees C, under atmospheric pressure." PM 10 or PM 2.5 refers to the finer portions of Total Particulate Matter: • PM 10 would be particles with an aerodynamic mass mean diameter of 10 micrometres (10 pm) in diameter (size) • PM 2.5 would be particles with an aerodynamic mass mean diameter of 2.5 micrometres (2.5 pm) in diameter (size) Schedule D prescribes a list of test contaminants to be measured in the annual stack tests which includes: "Total Particulate Matter ( <44 pm) Alm REPORT NO.: PSD- 082 -11 PAGE 4 PM 10, including condensables PM 2.5 including condensables" Measurements of the PM 10 and PM 2.5 parameters will be taken, modeled and compared to the Ontario Ambient Air Quality Criteria (AAQCs) and guidelines for PM 10 and PM2.5, and used to verify the ambient air modeling results. 3. CONCURRENCE - Not applicable 4. CONCLUSION 4.1 This report responds to Council's request for additional information. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: David Crome 8 - -17 Clarftwn PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: October 17, 2011 Resolution #: By -law #: Report #: PSD- 083 -11 File #: PLN 26.15.3 Subject: REFURBISHMENT AND CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE DARLINGTON NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PSD- 083 -11 be received; 2. THAT Report PSD- 083 -11, including the comments prepared by the peer review consultants (Attachments 3 to 8), be submitted to Ontario Power Generation as the Municipality of Clarington's comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Refurbishment and Continued Operation of the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station Project; 3 THAT Ontario Power Generation be thanked for providing the Municipality of Clarington with the opportunity to undertake a peer review of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Project prior to its submission to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission; 4. THAT the peer review team, consisting of AECOM, Hardy Stevenson and Associates, RWDI and Hemson Consulting, be thanked for their efforts in completing the peer review in a timely manner; 5. THAT a copy of Report PSD- 083 -11 and Council's decision be forwarded to Ontario Power Generation and the Regional Municipality of Durham; and 6. THAT all interested parties listed in Report PSD- 083 -11 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1 3A6 T (905)623 -3379 F (905)623 -0830 .I • 1: Submitted by: - -�, D i Crome, MCIP, RPP Director, Planning Services JAS /FL /df /av 11 October 2011 Reviewed by: Franklin Wu Chief Administrative Officer REPORT NO.: PSD -083 -11 1. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF REPORT PAGE 3 1.1 Ontario Power Generation (OPG) has initiated the approvals process necessary to permit the refurbishment of the four reactors at the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station (DNGS) and their continued operation to about 2055 (the Project). This includes the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. 1.2 In July 2011, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) released a draft Scoping Document for the Refurbishment Project. The purpose of this document is to establish the required scope of the EA and to provide OPG with project- specific guidance for the conduct of environmental technical studies. Committee has previously considered the draft Scoping Document through Staff Report PSD- 077 -11 (September 12, 2011). 1.3 OPG advised the Municipality that, consistent with its established practice, funding would be made available to the Municipality of Clarington as the host community, to retain qualified professionals to undertake a peer review of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Refurbishment Project., The results of the peer review will be incorporated into the draft EIS prior to its submission to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. 1.4 AECOM Canada Ltd. was retained to undertake the peer review under the terms of the existing "Agreement for Professional Consulting Services" between the Municipality and AECOM, dated October 14, 2008. The consulting firms of Hardy Stevenson and Associates, Hemson Consulting and RWDI Group were sub - contracted to AECOM to assist in completing the peer review. The Terms of Reference for the peer review are set out in Attachment 2. 1.5 The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an overview of the peer review of the draft EIS for the Refurbishment Project, and to recommend to Council that the comments prepared by the peer review team be approved as the Municipality's comments on the draft EIS for the Refurbishment Project. 2. PEER REVIEW PROCESS 2.1 The Refurbishment and Continued Operations Project will be a complex multi -year undertaking that will involve the inspection, servicing and possible replacement of a number of major reactor components at the DNGS. After refurbishment is complete, the Station will continue to operate in the same manner as currently for approximately an additional 30 years. The draft EIS reflects this complexity and includes 15 separate Technical Support Documents (TSDs) which cover a wide range of disciplines. 2.2 The Terms of Reference for the peer review provides a fuller description of the Project and the scope of the work undertaken under the EIS. It also notes that the Municipality's peer review of the draft EIS and TSDs is intended to focus on the • 1 IN 21:1613 103MO, sONME Municipality's core responsibilities and interests - specifically Land Use, Socio- Economic Environment (including Municipal Finance), Traffic and Transportation, and Atmospheric Environment. 2.3 For each of the components of the environment, the peer reviewers are required to evaluate how the draft EIS addresses: ® The identification of the environmental effects of the Project, the likely cumulative effects related to other projects or activities that have been or will be undertaken, and the significance. of these effects; ® The measures proposed to mitigate adverse environmental effects; ® The requirements of a follow -up program in respect of the Project; and ® Study strategy and methodology, and use of existing information. 2.4 The peer review began in late June 2011 and has required a significant time commitment from the peer review consultants, Municipal staff, as well as OPG and their consultants. The peer review team and Staff provided numerous comments which were discussed at a number of technical meetings in August and September 2011. The comments on the draft EIS and each of the TSDs reviewed, as well as the dispositions to the comments proposed by OPG, are set out in Attachments 3 through 8 to this report. All of the comments have been dispositioned to the satisfaction of the peer review team. 2.5 The peer review team will be presenting the results of their review at the October 17, 2011 Committee meeting. 3. OVERVIEW OF PEER REVIEW COMMENTS AND DISPOSITIONS 3.1 Traffic and Transportatio 3.1.1 To evaluate the likely effects on traffic and transportation conditions on the road network as a result of the Project, the TSD considered the Project at four specific points in time: ® 2014: DNGS will be operating, and. site preparation activities will be underway for the Refurbishment Project and the New Nuclear Development (NND) Project; ® 2018: A full complement of New Nuclear Development (NND) Project construction staff, and DNGS operations and refurbishment staff will be on -site; ® 2021: Construction and operations staff will be on -site for the NND project (for two units), as will the operations and refurbishment staff for the DNGS; ® 2031: All construction activities for both the Refurbishment and NND projects will be complete, and a full operating staff will be in place. 8 -21 REPORT NO.: PSD- 083 -11 PAGE 5 3.1.2 For each time horizon the baseline condition included all traffic expected to occur in the study area (including NND traffic), but not Refurbishment Project- related traffic. It also included all operational and safety - related improvements assumed to be have been made to the roads - related infrastructure in order to deal with non - Project - related growth in traffic. The effects of the. Refurbishment Project were then evaluated against the assumed future road network. Where this analysis identified potential unacceptable system performance as the result of Project - related traffic, further system upgrades were identified as mitigation measures and the effects of these improvements were taken into account. 3.1.3 The peer review team made a number of comments on the assumed future baseline conditions and the analysis of Project - related traffic impacts and mitigation measures. The major concern identified relates to the potential cumulative effects on traffic and transportation that may result from all of the major projects expected to occur in the Local Study Area (LSA). Of particular concern are the timelines of the significant transportation network improvements that the Refurbishment Project seems to be relying on to mitigate traffic and transportation impacts, such as the reconstruction of the Holt Road interchange (for the NND Project) and the construction of the 407 East Link, including reconfiguration of the Courtice Road Interchange. 3.1.4 'OPG has acknowledged that the timing and interactive effects of the various developments and infrastructure and road improvements may have impacts on the traffic operations of the LSA network. OPG has committed "to participate in a process to develop a Traffic Management Plan and to participate financially as appropriate in necessary transportation works /improvements in a timely manner if they are attributable to the DNGS Refurbishment Project." 3.2 Socio- Economic Environment TSD 3.2.1 The Socio- Economic TSD provided a description of the existing socio- economic environment and the anticipated effects of the various Project activities on this environment. Aspects of the environment discussed included population, the local and regional economies, community infrastructure and services, residents and communities, and public attitudes. Municipal Finance is also included in the'Socio- Economic TSD, but was peer reviewed separately. 3.2.2 The TSD found that the Project would provide a minor positive benefit to population growth, and will contribute to increased business activity and an increased demand for skilled workers during the construction phase. No significant adverse effects on the socio- economic environment were identified. 3.2.3 The peer review team found that the TSD characterized the existing socio- economic environment comprehensively and accurately, and that the community benefits identified are reasonable. The team also agreed with the conclusion that there will not likely be any measurable residual socio- economic effects resulting from the Project. 8 -22 3.3 Municipal Finance (part of the Socio- Economic Environment TSD 3.3.1 The Socio- Economic Environment TSD projected that the Project will provide a benefit to the Municipality's taxable assessment base and that the Municipality will gain direct new taxes and other revenues such as building permit fees and development charges associated with the construction of support facilities. As well, funding for the provision of services required to support the Project will be made available through increased household property taxes associated with the Project, and property taxes to be paid by OPG. 3.3.2 The peer review team noted that the Municipality can expect expenditure impacts arising from the Project, most notably on road (transportation) and protection services, and that these costs will not be covered by increased revenue sources related to the Project. OPG also noted that the Traffic Management Plan will provide the opportunity to identify the appropriate fiscal framework for transportation mitigation. 3.4 Land Use TSD 3.4.1 The effects of the Project in the Local Study Area (LSA) were evaluated. Project effects on existing, planned and future land uses at greater distances were not anticipated since the DNGS is an established facility. As well, potential changes or influences on land use as a consequence of the presence and operation of the Station are not considered an adverse effect on land use. 3.4.2 Project - related effects on land use in the LSA were considered in terms of existing land uses, planned future land uses (to 2031) based on currently planned living and employment areas plus the growth projections in "Places to Grow for the Greater Golden Horseshoe ", the Region's municipal growth allocations and the Recommended Growth Scenario in the Growing Durham Study. This future land use scenario was also used in the EA for the New Nuclear Development (NND) Project. 3.4.3 The TSD concluded that the Refurbishment project will provide employment opportunities that may combine with unrelated municipal growth and development to increase pressure for land uses in the LSA, most notably in the Contiguous Zone, for emergency planning purposes that are incompatible with the continued presence and operation of the DNGS. (The Contiguous Zone extends approximately 3 km from the DNGS reactors). This is considered a likely adverse effect. Mitigation measures suggested include the monitoring of land use activity, applications and policies in proximity to DNGS, and maintaining communications with the Municipality and the Region. 3.4.4 The peer review team indicated that the description of the existing land use environment, the overall assessment of land use effects, and the proposed mitigation measures were satisfactory. The team suggested that the TSD should include stronger language on how OPG will work with the Municipality to control land use in the vicinity of the plant. In response, OPG noted that land use governance in the vicinity of nuclear power plants will be addressed through the DNNP project, and whatever outcome' is ultimately approved /agreed will be reflected in the Refurbishment work. Eta+ 3 REPORT NO.: PSD -083 -11 3.5 Atmospheric Environment TSD PAGE 7 3.5.1 The Refurbishment Project will primarily involve interior construction work and is therefore not expected to contribute large amounts of contaminants to the atmosphere. The contaminants of concern are dust, and NO2from vehicle exhaust. Predicted air quality concentrations were compared to the applicable assessment criteria, and considered in the context of pathways to human health and non -human biota. 3.5.2 Based on the results of the modelling which considered very conservative bounding assessment scenarios, the changes in air quality as a result of the Project are not measurable or are well below the applicable Ambient Air Quality Criterion (AACQ). The Project - related changes in air quality are not considered to represent an adverse environmental effect. 3.5.3 The peer review team provided a number of comments on the criterion and standards referenced in the assessment (e.g. benzene, NO2), and requested clarification of assumptions used in the modelling. It was also noted that, due to limitations in dispersion modelling, predicted maximum concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 exclude occasional current and future events of elevated regional background concentration. However, the data was found to be realistic. 3.5.4 The peer reviewer commented that the combined effect of the Refurbishment and NND construction activities should be assessed for nearby receptors, as well as the predicted frequency of occurrence of elevated 1 hour concentrations of NO2 and 24 hour benzene. The combined effect of other projects in the area was not assessed; however, the coincident incremental contribution of the EFW is expected to be small, based on reports available for the facility. OPG responded that the cumulative effects assessment is included in the EIS, and not in the TSD. 3.6 Environmental Impact Statement 3.6.1 The EIS includes a Project Description and provides a summary of the more detailed analyses outlined in the various TSDs. It also includes a discussion of the anticipated cumulative effects on all aspects of the environment potentially resulting from the Refurbishment Project in combination with other projects to be undertaken in the area. This assessment found that no residual cumulative effects were expected on those aspects of the environment that were subject to municipal peer review, and that this result was not surprising given that the Project involves an existing facility. 3.6.2 The EIS also discusses the development of the follow -up and monitoring program for each of the disciplines. This program will focus on verifying the predicted effects of the Project and the effectiveness of the identified mitigation measures, such as the Traffic Management Plan, the implementation of Good Environmental Management Practices to manage nuisance effects related to dust and noise, and working with community partners to maintain safe public access to the Waterfront Trail on the Darlington site. 3.6.3 The peer review team's comments sought to clarify statements in the EIS and reiterated some of their comments on the various TSDs. The peer reviewers concurred with the findings presented in the EIS. 8 -24 1103 A •* LOAN r 1 4. CONCLUSION 4.1 Staff have reviewed and concur with both the comments made by the peer review team and the dispositions provided by OPG. The peer review process has allowed the draft EIS and TSDs to be revised to reflect the Municipality's comments and concerns prior to its submission to the CNSC. 4.2 The most significant concern identified through the peer review was the impact of the Refurbishment Project, in combination with other major projects planned for the area, on the local road network. and the financial implications for the Municipality. In their responses, OPG has agreed to include the development of a Traffic Management Plan as a mitigation measure. The Plan will be initiated with the partner agencies (OPG, Clarington, Region, MTO, GO Transit), with the Terms of Reference to be agreed upon prior to the end of 2011 and work beginning early in 2012. OPG has agreed to initiate discussions with the other partner agencies. 4.3 OPG has also indicated it is willing to enter into a front - ending agreement with Clarington for works required of OPG by the Traffic Management Plan. The agreement would be based on Clarington's standard front - ending agreement and will be negotiated by the Directors of Engineering Services and Finance and to the satisfaction of the Municipal Solicitor 5. CONCURRENCE: Reviewed by Municipal Solicitor CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN The recommendations contained in this report conform to the general intent of the following priorities of the Strategic Plan: X Promoting economic development X Maintaining financial stability Connecting Clarington Promoting green initiatives X Investing in infrastructure Showcasing our. community Not in conformity with Strategic Plan Staff Contact: Janice Szwarz, Principal Planner 8 -25 REPORT NO.: PSD- 083 -11 ViTO -W Attachments: Attachment 1: Glossary of Terms Attachment 2: Terms of Reference — Peer Review Attachment 3: Traffic and Transportation TSD - Comment and Disposition Form Attachment 4: Socio- Economic Environment TSD — Comment and Disposition Form Attachment 5: Municipal Finance — Comment and Disposition Form Attachment 6: Land Use TSD — Comment and Disposition Form Attachment 7:- Atmospheric Environment TSD — Comment and Disposition Form Attachment 8: Environmental Impact Statement — Comment and Disposition Form List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: John Peters, Manager, Environmental Assessment Alex Georgieff, Commissioner of Planning 8 -26 GLOSSARY OF TERMS AAQC Ambient Air Quality Criterion ALARA As Low As Reasonable Achievable BP Building Permits CNSC Canadian Nuclear Safety R Commission DC Development Charges DGR Deep Geological Repository DN Darlington Nuclear DNGS Darlington Nuclear Generating TSD Station DNNP Darlington New Nuclear Project EA Environmental Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement HWSB Heavy Water Storage Building L& ILW Low and Intermediate Level Waste LSA Local Study Area MOU Memorandum of Understanding MPAC Municipal Property Assessment Corporation NND New Nuclear Development an Attachment 1 to Report PSD- 033 -11 NOx Nitrogen Oxides NWMO Nuclear Waste Management R Organization OPG Ontario Power Generation PAH Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon PM Particulate Matter PPB Parts per Billion R Receptor (eg. R19) RLWMS Radioactive Liquid Waste Management System RSA Regional Study Area SSA Site Study Area TSD Technical Support Document V/C Volume /Capacity VOC Volatile Organic Compound WHO World Health .Organization WMF Waste Management Facility WTP Water Treatment Plant Attachment 2 to Report PSD- 083 -11 DARLINGTON NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION REFURBISHMENT AND CONTINUED OPERATION PROJECT MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON - PEER REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TERMS OF REFERENCE BACKGROUND In February 2010, Ontario Power Generation (OPG) announced that it is proceeding with the planning phase for a mid -life refurbishment of the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station. The undertaking is referred *to as the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station (DNGS) Refurbishment and Continued Operation Project (DNGS Refurbishment Project or the Project). In April 2011, OPG submitted a Project Description to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC). The Project Description includes general information on the DNGS Refurbishment Project, Including project activities, description of the existing environment, potential project -- environment interactions, and a preliminary EA schedule. The Project Description forms Attachment 1 to these Terms of Reference. OPG Is providing funding to the Municipality of Clarington to undertake a technical peer review of those parts of the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the supporting Technical Support Documents (TSD) that relate to the Municipality's core responsibilities, The objective of the peer review will be to ensure that the EA has been done according to current standards and codes of practice and that the interests of the Municipality of Ciarington and its residents have been properly addressed in the preparation of the EIS for the Project. OVERVIEW OF DNGS REFURBISHMENT PROJECT The Darlington Nuclear Generating Station consists of four CANDU reactors that were commissioned and placed into operation between 1990 and 1993. The total electrical output of the station is approximately 3,524 megawatts (MW). CANDU nuclear reactors are designed to include a mid -life outage and refurbishment after about 30 years of service: It is expected that the refurbishment of the reactors will extend the operating life of the DNGS for approximately another 30 years of service.- A refurbishment is a major and complex construction project that requires significant human resources with a wide variety of skill sets, and a large number of suppliers and contractors with specialized expertise or products. Refurbishment would involve Inspecting and servicing a number of major components in the reactors and, if applicable, replacing them during planned outages., in these planned outages, the reactor would be defueled and dewatered; the stearn generators would be cleaned (it is not intended that they be replaced during the refurbishment process; however, some may be replaced later during the continued operation phase). Following each planned outage, the refurbished unit would be refueled and returned to full power operation Continued operations following refurbishment would be in the same manner as the reactors have operated since they were originally commissioned, including routine scheduled maintenance activities and inspections. Used nuclear fuel would continue to be stored in the station's Irradiated Fuel Bays before being transferred to dry storage at the existing Darlington Waste Management Facility (DWMF) located on the DNGS site. For this project a fourth dry storage warehouse would be mm needed. Refurbishment wastes may be stored at a radioactive waste storage building at the DWMF and operational low and intermediate level waste will be transported to the Western Waste Management Facility (WWMF) operated by OPG at the Bruce Power site near Kincardine, Ontario, or to another licenced facility. The preliminary scope of.the DNGS Refurbishment project for purposes of the FA is summarized as follows: • Construction of the appropriate management facilities for interim storage and processing of refurbishment waste and used nuclear fuel. ® Refurbishment of the DNGS reactors, including: • Isolation of the refurbished, Unit from the operating units and preparation of unit areas for refurbishment activities • Removal of used fuel from the core • Removal and storage of heavy water from moderator and hear transport systems • Maintain condition of reactor systems as required for future operation o. Removal /replacement of fuel channel assemblies and feeder pipes o Additional modifications /maintenance /inspections on other plant systems • Filling moderator and heat transport systems with Heavy Water • Refueling, and o Testing and startup of systems to support return to service. • Operation and maintenance of the DNGS reactors and associated facilities for approximately an additional 30 years of full power production, including major component replacement, if needed, in the future, • Operation (processing and interim storage) of the appropriate nuclear waste management facilities. • Transfer of low and intermediate level waste off-site to the Western Waste Management Facility for centralized storage. • Placement of units into safe storage leading to the decommissioning stage. The refurbishment Phase would be approximately 10 -11 years. For PA purposes, it Is assumed that there would be some overlap in reactor refurbishment, with no more than two reactors in outage at any given time, The Continued Operation Phase would be a period of approximately 30 years for each, reactor and would commence with the return to service of the first refurbished unit (around 2019) and conclude with the eventual shutdown of the last unit (around 2055). 8 -29 The following timelines have been proposed by OPG for EA study purposes: Project Start,. Finish Refurbishment 2013 2024 Continued Operations 2019 2055 Decommissioning (Preliminary Plan) 2056 2095. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Environmental Impact Statement and Technical Support Documents The Project Description submitted by OPG will allow the CNSC to determine whether a federal environmental assessment (EA) is required for the Project under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. To date, the CNSC has not made this determination and has not issued the EA Study Guidelines, However, for EA planning purposes, OPG has assumed that the Project will be required to undertake a Screening Level EA In accordance with the CNSC document "Environmental Assessment Screening Process at CNSC', which forms Attachment 2 to these Terms of Reference, OPG has- indicated that it will be submitting the final draft EIS and supporting TSDs to the CNSC in December 2011, The EIS will consist of a main summary document which will include the Project Description and the Project Scope. Separate TSDs will be prepared for the following disciplines: Natural and Soclo- Economic Environment (Existing Conditions and Effects Assessment) • Aquatic • Atmospheric • Geological and Hydrogeological • Land Use • Physical and Cultural Heritage • Socio Economic • Surface Water • Terrestrial • Traffic and Transportation Other Disciplines • Aboriginal interests .• Communications and Consultation • Ecological Risk Assessment • Human Health • Malfunctions and Accidents • Radiation and Radioactivity Effects Previous Environmental Studies at the Darlington Nuclear Site J Since the. 1970s, OPG and its predecessor Ontario Hydro have been engaged in extensive data collection and analysis of the Darlington Nuclear (DN) site, and has recently prepared two EA studies for the site, as discussed below. M ® Darlington Used Fuel Dry Storage Facility EA, 2003 This EA was accompanied by a number of comprehensive environmental studies to characterize the existing environmental conditions in the vicinity of the DN site and to predict environmental results that may result from the Darlington Waste Management Facility (DWMF). The Municipality of Clarington undertook a peer review of the EA for the DWMF. a Darlington New Nuclear Build Project EA, 2009 OPG prepared an EiS and 28 TSDs as part of the EA for the New Nuclear Build (NN D), Project, which is proposed for the eastern half of the DN site. These documents describe the likely environmental effects of constructing and operating'a new nuclear power plant supplying up to 4,800 MW at the' DN site. Collectively, the EiS and TSDs represent over 10,000 pages of environmental studies focused on the DN site and adjacent areas. The Municipality of Clarington. undertook a comprehensive peer review of the EIS and many of the TSDs for the NND Project. OPG has indicated that it intends to rely on and update much of the work undertaken through these EAs'In its preparation of the EIS and TSDs for the Darlington Refurbishment Project, PEER REVIEW OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Scope Of Work The Municipality of Clarington, as the host community for the DNGS, is a key stakeholder in the EA process. The technical peer review is intended to encompass a detailed review of the draft EIS and TSDs as it relates to the Municipality's core responsibilities and interests, specifically: 0 land Use ® Socio- Economic Environment Traffic and Transportation, and • Atmospheric Environment. In general terms, the peer review consultant will be required to perform the following activities: 1. Review relevant reports and studies prepared as part of the draft EIS. 2. Attend meetings with OPG, its consultants and municipal staff. 3. Provide OPG with draft and final comments on the review of Draft EIS and related TSDs. 4. Review OPG's disposition of comments on the EIS report and related TSDs, including acknowledgement that comments have been adequately addressed. 5. Prepare draft and final reports related to the peer review. 6. Present final peer'review results to Clarington Council. 7. Attend OPG Community Information Sessions, if so directed by-Clarington 8 -31 In specific terms, the peer review will focus on the following: • Socio- economic environment and land use, including but not limited to o community services o infrastructure improvements o municipal finance o- employment opportunities and competition for skilled workers • community image • public involvement and concerns with the Project. • Traffic and transportation including but not limited to • road access to site • increased road traffic and accident frequency • transportation and disposal of conventional waste, • Atmospheric environment including but not limited to o dust and noise during construction For each of the aspects of the environment identified above, the peer review will evaluate how the EIS addresses: • The identification of the environmental effects of the project, including the environmental effects of malfunctions and Accidents, the likely cumulative effects related to other projects or activities that have been or will be undertaken, and the significance of these effects, • The measures proposed to mitigate adverse environmental effects • The requirements of a follow -up program in respect of the Project. • Study strategy and methodology and use of existing information. The scope of work required of the consultant may be modified once the final CNSC Scoping Information Document has been approved, Proposed Schedule of Work The following schedule is preliminary and, may be revised during the course of the peer review. OPG has indicated that it- wishes to submit the final draft EIS and supporting TSDs to the CNSC in December 2011, • Draft TSDs provided - Peer review commences June 27, 2011 • Draft EIS provided July 15, 2011 • Remaining TSDs (not to be reviewed) provided to Clarington July 15, 2011 • Initial meeting (1) between Peer Review Team and OPG consultants July 18 - 22, 2011 • Peer review period . June 27 - Aug. 19, 2011 • Roundtable meetings: 3 - 4 meetings (2 -3 hours each) Aug. 22 - Sept. 2, 2011 • Any remaining TSDs (not for review) provided to Clarington Sept. 2, 2011 8 -32 a % day meeting on final disposition of comments Sept. 12 -16, 2011 ® 'Sign -off of final Comment Disposition.Sheet Sept. 30, 2011 o Final peer review report to Clarington October 7, 2011 ® Presentation of peer review results to GPA Oct. 17, 2011 QUALIFICATIONS AND PER DIEM RATES The Consultant is requested to identify a team with personnel that will be assigned to specific areas of the Project, including any sub - consultants, and their relevant experience and education. The per diem rates for each of the identified personnel should also be provided. The Consultant shall also identify any potential conflicts with; ® Ontario Power Generation ® Any consultants retained by Ontario Power Generation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Project Description — DNGS Refurbishment Project; OPG April 2011 2. Environmental Assessment Screening. Process at CNSC (INFO- 0774); CNSC January 2009. . MW w z ui .U) LLI CU) l) z uj z 0 z LLI F- z w E VJ "T- LL uj D� -Z 0. I-- z 0 fI 0 W CL inn E Z: 4, 0 0 > ui 0 15 0- CD CL M E 0 IM E 0 0 00 Attachment 3 to Report PSD-083-11 44— 0 8-34 z Z E LU U) 0 a. CD LL 0 CD Xj -9 L) CD P, Ql Z 0 vi Ei -= �j 'D 0 z 0 Fz U) P 0 CL L) CL :3 w 0 '70 7� z lu aj ct� 0 0 LU .0 M (7.' W, t 0 0 CL , � w 0 0,0 P� w —to > 0 Q-) a) 0 0 P o as CL up bt"ll) -0 0 0 E UJ 0 0 L) H E g z 0 44— 0 8-34 LU LU z 0 N 8-35 C) CD O 0 E 6t5 iU -E 0 0 > E uj U) 4.1 E 0 0 In > LU 0+1 CL cL E F- fly ol 0 00 C-4 Cl%l Cl E 0 W m tU L6 yL E-P 0� :3 0 41 0 Im 0 t-2 p (L C; uj 0 V.) M4 z w V 0 CL th LU > vi w F- ui < z 0 E ,2 N c 5 g 0 0 0 u 0 0 V) 0 A! C-4 Cl%l 'Z LU uj U) -j .z uj 0 z LLJ z LLJ cn U- LL• 0 z M C� 0 Z E cU E CL Lu CD ip In C. CD E E cn ♦> Jw LU 0 CL m E U) :3 —.0 0.0 u 0 tp cn co E fC 0 4) 0 (D N o') 0 m Aw. ar Z �II z o FIUJ E Lo w > CL )T -D ff, C, O 6J 0 br) C, > —r, O .2 :� 'L" -0 LZ. > 0 C4, vp z > x C, z 0 "Ib r� 0 CL t p CL y 0 ca tv) C�5 15 co . y. Z 14, o C) Ste+ ter, 0.4 Z, w 0 T41 Ul ry —0 to 0 LU o .0 t42 S9 -0 t�4 ID LU 0 U o 0 CL 0 0 0 > co 0 0 bf) CZ7, t/I J .0 i3 c0 X� 0 tit) Q M -Z) --b 0 Tt CL a) o > L) 0 0 5! R' br 12, -1 -1-- C) 0 d -8 < U r J Cc,- 0 a) H -d ..... ......... ... ........ ..... a) G r7 E z Z3 N th W 21 a .0 (D .2 to Elf N o') 0 m Aw. I-- .z :0 C) 5; U w L ■ 8-37 CD .0 L) :3 E Aw Cf) .E -M .E .c 'I., .0 ul Ql FZ E 0.0 0 L. LU 0 L2. tU (D Oi 0 (D no C\f cy') 4— 0 ,It 2, El Ft Lu 0 0 x CL U) U) a) LD ca CL ro < ss co '0 0 L) >1 LID 0 t 0 7z; En z ai 0 0 �11. 0 q CL, .2 . . 0 x: rL W a) ob 0 y W) V 0 LU 0 0 ca T" 10 z F- -4 C/.) d 0 P 0 bij uj uj CL t�o L) 0 LU Of) m > LU 0 .0 —j v sl U F- C) 10, F- 41 .a Ca Q bf) C) z- 72 0 C) 0 CD � 0 fu Q) C, C4 V on E z IN V) 0 0 0 E Q3 Q3 C\f cy') 4— 0 ,It .r— z ui m 0 (1) LLJ z LLJ L 0 LIJ F- z LLI M Ir I V) co U- uj w z 0 F- 0 z z r- Q CC CL E 4- ia) > c C .0 0 tO > r- ,z LU CD F- 0 41 N O m L-01M., Z 2 >o El > (D 5 ju CL en F71 0 C*4 0 0 Ei op _0 a) El Z -S4 Cl • z Cc CL I> L) .0 cO, W E z 0 73 t-e , P ql L21 v o z 0 GI 0 CL G= v) V t- P, U) 0 V) F14 cz A, LU L-4 -0 C) U. Ewl L U . Lo- 2 > .2 v-1 0 a5 ci -Z--. ca U) 0 CL E6 o V, > iu (n c 14 0 to > CL t� cr, bb c: tt Ul Oy rn o -LV" :0 -En to GJ 'o o Fl ct ;> 4) 0 0 10 C, F.4 42 w T-- o R u C4 ,Fap tt r tSl C cc E z W vo F c 0 > to N O m L-01M., U) z 0 0 a. z z its .0 ul w I ow rr 0 0 z r- 0 VI 7: to 0 LU ELT RS 0 o > Lu t 0 a Eu E I 0 W Do Mol ai z z LLJ 0 p .W 0 LLI Q. J5 CD a) 0 CN Ql lC 0 o 1> x (P E z cn 0 fL 4) LU 0 z lu u z 0 > CL W c LU "a C > ai cd GO cz 44 0 0 ad E C) rq C1 4 tn 10 tn z U) 0 0 ci > E L--L- Mol ff*7 w LLJ LU (L 0' U- 0 C) 0 I.- M z a 0 45 t- o o 41 E Cl) *1 m CL E li - 41 E C *1 0 C E > LU .t., 0 CL cL E cn U p Ck Cri O a am Z ijj ❑ LU 0 ra tr t�O t6 :j CU J4 Q) U p- G V cu m :4 M, o r.G 0 0 M cr, P 1-4 0 0 CL 0 CL t, rl. bb d) rl G Q 0 ti) tn z 0 44 e o z Id 1, �Drj C:L �l -- co Cn r4 CG 0 LU o L) Q) CL LI) V.7 > v e,) q CL4 r. —vo C) C) r) UJ E '0 z E.—O L AV 0 L) m o cll 0 0 . 0 i3 > CD a E co Ck Cri O a am w Ltt r U) z 0 0 a. C3 d z uj //0+� L LU �I W W CL z 0 Z m i ■ M� r r C) N 0 L t? z _4 C� Cti 0 tV t`(0 �J U C W N {I? E � U � C? 0 LU Q CL 42 rzU SU w O 0 ®o a co Q Q> � W 0 W F_ II 0 � d W U LV z !f1 4r rn 10 v, Cf-3 G � G t3 ,p tj.. S t) .., y C} CL ® U by 0 � M m in G v? ' r, C 0 G' L � . LC j (Lt 0 W `) N b4ti ca :n to Gj 0, C3 G r rn � C� .� G G r "G O U � bpi Q � •� Q M bb p C CL 7Z) a3 C, _ v} v N .0 ILI U � 'G p U •w G 5 n7 °' G n bli o U G q3 �✓j bfl w Ln on w Q:,. U '_ r}"j .,.,' ";i by V — q r e� r� r, +U+ V v _Q cv . J c� N N Z7 C G ,4 C G r-4 t+l z ry E cYi ^h Rs rs ° ° A � r a) O E E. a co m CD iGw 0 aM LSf QS E CL �E 76 E .a 41 0 0) c E uj 0 0 > w t 0 0.0 cL E cm U 0 no m am :0 Z Z M W .'I Li 0 0 cn > tu .0 iL (n co F7 0 0 H, c-, 47A 0 0 z co .v v U X at E 1 iF al W L> 0 � al y -0 0 a. A CL ci ILL (Y) rl > Z� C) Op cm-_ z o 0 ul 0 7-1 rl 0 b c.) crl Q- bb '� w LU CL o. 7 cp m > -0 '0 u u LU crI ILI E5 �3 0 ci ce LID > cr, c, cr, 0 co e-I E cli L) > qi 0 o m am L w Z (.n .0 z 8-43 EU 0 0 4 41 Ian US .E fU 4) C E E U) < V) t m (D CC E E 0 ryVL > uj 0 0. E its 42 0 E 2 0 W 00 chi 0 a cr z W E 0 Lu o a. w tp� 0 0 > IS: w E 0 0 Er z 0 0 CL ct: d) f�" W z :> LC! =1 4a) 0 w co 0 6 75) > tIll CL Iii U) 0 0 r G 44 71 Ll� to !:J) m LU -0 0 LU cr rd C,7 T 0 > cn co o g� c;l — 0) 0 4M > 0 2 o o v7 0 L) > VII E zf E,2 C'j bb VII 0 o 0 0 Z 5 E 0 W chi 0 a LU z ,w m CO (n w w 0 z z LLJ Z- r CID w D U- Z. O O z c .0 tU E CL .E .E r E- UJ to RS of tp LU CL = E p tU E o 00 .0 8-44 z w ate. cr X1 0-0 0 tu C 4) z ul E 65 cn Z 0 a CL v C/) C FE Ei t7- bb 0 rL 0 0 C� cri 'd CL U) p m zs (n w En w —m 0 L) 0 A z D 0 LU ✓ o -2 0 a w 0 bf) 0 L) ti C,3 �1,1, 4, Lo > �w CL U) U) - bl) [5 d) -, C:� -a (5 m LU cl, CI- co LU 0 ct 0 Tl in � Q, 00 cd C-j QJ CD btl tO CD o O N 0 6 0 -ZI il Q Tg aa uj < t) C/J 0 o M m 0 . C E N z R bi j (n V Q a C: 0- > > E < 0 .0 8-44 ■ ME z a 0 4- sc sj iv E rn O E E .c � 0 w < 4- :E E 0 in > LU 0 0.0 E Cf) 4 C cp E 1! 0 w co CV Z jj F-I CL � U) in Cl DD 7i (D cz -0 C.3 0 bl) yv C) � > L) 13 0 q z cl -TJ x bf) > ^ 0 bLr) ro 0 CL '0 in m .-0 16 t6 v te, zi rl .LU w) Q -0 C: w tn OD Arl 'r, > E0 LU P- C) as w > >1 "m P cz 5: > LU C11 co d) C) r4 -� 4.1 :ALI o 0 w F5 a v 45 1 � :s u 0 Cu ll z N cl -4 GIB AM I- c 0 0 a w < a) Lo a CV tu Hill F— CL :5 z z LU a Cl) co LU U) Cl) F- Z ui :1 E 7F 0 z LU .1— z ui V I. LW6w 'n LL LU ce is z C 0 0 t 4) E a) E 41 E c , 0 a CD E UJ U> C E E 0 w 0 CL cL E CIS ca a) E CD S= 0 a) Do 0 co MO. Z Z LU (D 0 tu X In 0 Ul a. Y) F�71 C) ui 0 cv -,Zj E z GG E3 (L) M E x cu >1 C) t5 ra -� 4-- CL C7 ci a) Ci b 50 Or; r. LU 0 J:5 '2 •m r', z Ul C 0 U) 0 ;=4 L F- r .0 > 0, ID > 0 D >� 0 p 6 4- P EL a) ul uj CL W, tr 0 0 ct, Ell cj GO 0 o So I- ��, 0 , c� 9 � > E, Ul -cl 0 lb 15 , IW 0 w > — -S� > cl, 0 o 0 cc Cl) U bb 0 O 3 0 co MO. 0 d 0 C) R 0 N C) U 0 FG di G� z c 0 0� N 0 #s CD U) U m CL E C c .— o c ." w >- E !I! 41 CU E V 0 O CTy> W O tU U � Q, cu :� E 0 C. 0 d' Z u� w O W M m N itt a � O F r ti C)�M rn P itl j 0 z 0 r ..w v � •i'. '.�� ai E o r p Q a w l C o ' p a V o c+s u u .< v °' CL Ed ci } .dF) P .0 e ut tn a,U= o U W CL ux r, C a w V W :-a N oil G 0 Q3 y Q cd roo a) Q CF 0 d' Lu L11 r C6 z 0 F- ribiq ct Z C: 0 Qy ul CL tF .E 0 Lu (n Ri c 43 E: E V E 0 a 0 C > w u 0 is 0 to col LD 0 16 z Z 0 p rr cn 05 w CL L) �® l L) CU di o t Q CI 0 r b f) E r4 A ro ":J 0 m t.) C IM, in G Q) 0 0 -- -,. 5 E x z N M 0 > 0 0 CL fL is y 0 LL all - 0 -- 10 n Ei F- CL " LU F- z z V rr cn C4, ul .,G o r ch — �f z q Cd -se o ED :U1 0 r4 e 0 (v w uj -7L, p it .5- LU 0 > ca. - > > LU Z 6f) P CU m V is U > -= f �) r- L of] bb Q) cp CI- cs.i It AD 0 � ;> Of) —tt, 0 Z> > UJ —C, E 0 0 *� z E.2 kA In c M 0 0 V) a> CD 0 0 5 > C co 65 w LD 0 LLI 5: LU Lit LU (L O WN HA M. (D 0 rn z c 0 QS 4-� L_ 0 E 44 u .to CL E tG E 0 > C UJ -0 C: 0 c: 0 > LU t',." 0 cL E E :3 0 CN 0 45 Z UJ o w ow> LU Cl. in (D D 0 C� CS p Lo cl, L:Q) aj X E w 0 0 CL LL 0- 0 U) nu 0 (D CL u W di) ct � 1) X: co P, cl, V Cal -0 X� LU of C3 co w o V o. t�) tjJ L7, CU chi t5 o > 0 0 o rrl L) C, Q lf � Q o L> CN 0 45 • 0 0 z c 0 EC fU .E (D 41 ctF .E r E uj Cs C: U) iii -E 0 > 0 E vJ 0 Eu 0 CD n 0 N 0 b Z UJ C) U) Orz u L6 aj C- .E c7, .q 0 Er 7) 7, > E3 C Q Ce d , ✓ Cl C/-) CA 0 tl}`' E C, 0 cT. tom. M U Cal ;> L) x; m C) 6 Fzv 0 C) F- t Q o C—I ✓ E5 a. 0 CL p 0 , 0 — 0 0 41 V ca U. — W J3 LU ho 0 W Q V ", > .-t— ' kN; 0 ;, - 0 C) r. o cd .0 L6 ;> o • A lu t 0 CL U) tyj 5 > (f, V 0 f7, 0 C: "r Cl, 0 C;3 tr, sn' m 0 0 oj),T: 0 -'d:) 5 -,f) IL 44 L' 7" 0 0 3 no u ro 0 u ul i,� 0 < v Id rp G 0 -d L) 4-d 0 a) C— al Q 0 0 z 0 .4-1 17 bfj 0 �:- :+7-' C) .0 0 = Ln > LIJ 0 'CO "1 < v Z tg) ra. 0 m E z E hi if! V.) tri P, 0 9 o a) 0) r - 0 0 > W C CD E N 0 :E 8•51 0 0 tU z G 0 +1 C 0 E CL tC E .E 0 > c LU < E 0 in > LU t .0 0. 0 0- E z ch cn E 0 D CD c 0 0 0 0) Z Z F1 o w W 0. a) CD rvl < tf, 0 a CI- CD v 75 'FL14 x �20 Q co , g ro z N 0 0 - U fL 4i CL al Q> V, Ul tJ TJ in LU 0 , 5 q 3: o al 0 r - in -fw� 11 LSI rz '0 0 0 0 0 0 > cv 0 0 I-- Ul .tu 9 z 0 U ii i. CD 0 E a) T u w CL E 2 4.1 C: > E c i91 N Lu (n < G E E 0 0 0 > 0 CL tt L) r_ 10 0) no 8-52 0 L w cr 0 U) ce -Z5, L6 5n. .,v Q) > rd En 0 X �A X, 0) tn z 0, 0 S2 0 CL 0 FR CL g'" (1) ILI 0 0 w .z in. V4 ;> fir, C z k11 S) ca, Q V-) H - bf) M w rU > r Ul L4 m m tp, L2 0 C) C) 1.0 0 V-) � uj Cl- 0 < Ca P-4 Go =0 .0 E 0 z 0 Cj GO (D C: (D CV 8-52 t. 8-53 T- 0 L) z to 0 (D dd 0 4— E CL E la iU c , 0 J= (D E Lu -0 c Ot 0 (D w E c 0 > w 0 CL o) c=L E cn.= 4 m L) W 0 0) M 0 N QS z w a: 0 LU tti > L3 O J tj) 0 L) U) r- til X j CL W ) U) > kri r. o v LU bb U C', " U :Ei 0 w Q) 0 r, L 0 > 0 0 L) 4- CL W a) v ral L6 w 0 0 t! V) 'C' uj 4:4 0 :5� < z E 2 OF in DIJ U) ❑ -j sv 0 Ti U > E C\l CK c < 0 tt, w N Y. it C14 iCi Z 0 4) 0 4. tC E CL c 4) E a 4+r 0 > a U) E LU ui 0 o CD > W CL a) C L cn co E 0 im C") 0 8-54 0 '7 z w F 0 > a) w 0 w CL C,) J% 70 > 00 N/1 0 X2 0 C5 ti aj t,, to 0 v, c�j co .0 c-, E o toy X L.J r tJi, 0 ct E) 2 —; �z 0 u - fL �n co Lr < cr, > 1%) "E rr, m > z DO co m 0 -0 F- z LU Lr :j ILI t 0 Ld C/D > w C -u LL C 0, H t Qo 0 uj tit) 0 rn cl, a w E 0 cz4 4� ol L4 cz cu rn () cu c Q -i4 CL 0 LLJ R 8- N E O 0 N 1 m z 0 E t r) 0 (> 0 0 E 0 c 0) 0 ch m :!Q--, C") 0 8-54 FN 8--55 a f! f i'. 0 cu d) U z c y0ya� Vl Yr tQ W 1. a� U i8 rL E 4) c 3+ O Lu C M O 0 Z, t� O CL � C C �- N' O a) 00 D a a Z 0.a o r U Q O CV U N Ua cr V .o v W C d) r ate•. IL o F- CL w - cn _vi r G vi LU ci v O T n p G A N c v w C) Au _ D f r y U ud j ^s 0 i° w p °r" U G cn 0) Q U y.� C. w Q O rUn J LU LL 6i r LU 1 5 (} su G ^ v H�-'•. LU v Q, N fn >-'4i r .0 �, � v ray U 1 G r t1 va p� cn � � ¢t tes � �� C7 a� �..• v v ey U Cy o v C a v o ;-r� 5 ,5 U Q O N 'U Z C% iN j CN ns D A .t i i� i • r �7 CJ C� tiS N Z a Q C CU .0 L ii. c 0 0I .� Gl C: U) 0 l6 to 0 � yy_ f>,1 L W 4 C2. tU c {} �L .0 U ty of F l~ O c lz V \Y 0 • • 0 w Z 0 � > ❑b E W Q W tY (L . SO III C0 t- v � N ........ . . _I Lea C) N co 0 o iQ . d) CAL y O a_ �.,.U� GE3 v '7 4) U d G Cr} � �+ i Q r s., a _ c.i , a w W L) C/ r U G L E a) CL '�ry '� :Il ii) N u r--. �} U l N .--ice' N G U C6 lti tt v r !} „_ r� p Ul r, a 4r} L G N c i P-t tU (ft -�g c: c) Gr G C) r, . 4 N w `r 'ri CL Q N v N U u u Q r 71 tl i ' Otir G 6NJ cz • n G: L VJ " O U c A e E O c N N U 'U bl) a} i-6. \Y 0 • • 5k, ON 8-57 C) Qi z C 0) E M CL E G 4, 0 > E ui tts U) < 4� E E 0 0 0 O Cl. py CL U sU 0 CN 0 z z w w (D 0 w 0 UJ CL CY CL 0 L6 L- 0 0 t7 r to H 4 UD X 0 0 0 iL U ti W .ul no C) bO 0 0 LU ca t 0 C) 1) 0 u K, 3= co LU c > v v) ij "o Ul ca v tt tits Z 0 7j. 0 > cj m o C5 2 m C, a) E E.2 :3 to C 0 0 0 -j co E 0 CN w ui z • 0 CSI 0 Qf o C to 1CL f 76 as E C 4, 0 > E 16 (D E E C 0 0 0 1- .cm > r C. W 41 0 c CL =; E cn ,E 0 0 0 CD 0 N 10 �m 0 H Lu ie 0 CL 0 0 cis cr �J, 0 0 0 En 1 0 o Q .0 r7, t a.. 0 0 0 CL U} _jb 0 LU 4, bl� n 0 CZ rn 0 LU U!, • vi ID zu '0 ct 0 0 c) v cad ui 'o .10 :m 0 a) CIO 74 -0 44 m Tr, Ln F- Q Tt, s E3 2 C) LLJ < ti S 0 Z E , v CD 0 > E 0 a - c 1< 0) ix (D th ±0:1! 0 N 10 �m Ilt z 0 F- V) 0 CL cl z z 0 w w 0- z 0 0 z 0 CL C) z 8--59 C) N :0 z 0 a o L- cr) > C w 0 0 bb 0 p in E 0 a), 0 (D 0 QO cat 0 z F1 2 3: ') t ul U) of 0 U) in ij (a C) 0 Cl p ril C, CIQ pl C) O 0 bb L) Q) > r" a) 0 ni L9 -:7, 4, 0 (D u ay z X E M, iz CL m 'r4 CL 0. Ir" L) :3 LLI uj Q) ) U c lu cc CL w uj K2 C3 J5 L2 0 Cc) r4 C") 25 Q) w C: c: E rE= ID 0 0 0 as 55 O 0 QO cat uj 0- z 0 0 i. RIME, 0 0 LU F1 p 3' ui 5 fy 0 W (n .0 (D U z CIO fj 0 ;o L) 0 -13 Z M D la) br) 0 C-7 -zj W tc� 0 0 co O W 0 0 0 41 :F V-J o > uj it 0 0 LU (n 0 bl) U> Ul V C m LU 52 0 4z 0 o rd w bli bf� ;145 CL 2 o V� .0 0 tZ, V) bfi CD 41 z 4+ 41 0 U, W 3. E C1 tlk 11 4t 1w E CI w < - ch W- —,, RIME, LL! LU z 0 (1) 0 n. Md 0 z �z LLJ 0 uj LU w HIOM I tG 0 4) E 4) E Ic 0 > E r- Lu rr 0 0 �O C w o CL CL E (D E 0 a) 00 0 co 0 Z a3 IkJ Lu cn LU .0-, CL 5t 10 N 0 Q) 2 V, X. j) rTJ ro f) co ru 0 OHO cz > 5 0 7-1 C) 0 o F-I 41 >- , 0 z ;2 t) F- C: CL C) 7�9 CL 0 w cc 0 0 0 uj 0 ID 0 U 0 Lli j 0 C) -0 o C5 0 zn 0 e) 0 Ul 0 'n an 0 Fjj > CL D V -0 75 iJl, 1I) > CL ul p bli Lli C-j > ul 0 0 0 0 > bt) Q 0 U e m 0 lu of) > r, j t > C) Ei 0 0 0 0 L) o 0 r" C� Lli cz > w C 0 Z M 1- 0 0 > 0) C > a) 0 E 0 co r— z LU Vd LU U) z uj a z 0 z ui z uj n r U) ca rvo IL LU 0 cw tti Z c 0 t; tli E C ., 0 E di E 0 LU 0 7 1 CL 55 0 ry E it u r_ 0 0 in 0 8-62 4) Z CD Z w 0 >w F, 71 V-,j bfa '0 IM ..0 (D E 2 Lj74 0 cl, X, u Q Z 0 a 0 a. TI p a CL 0 El ID CL bf) ;:j C;, C14 0 a U) w , bf) .0 Q 0 m m 75 =1 L 0 t LU r- Cd U) bl cri C. US C, f-) 0 cn %�-- 0 > CL rJ LU bri —:j -o 0 M Ul 1� �6 >) .3 Ci P S > Ul 0 Wj 0 bp 0 m '0 V LR a; bli 0 —0 121 (D W 0 E C) C1 c3 cv it N t) 0 cz; 7� 0 —V un fE 0 ,E 0 z N E (5 tiY C 0 0 M a) •L > E co aj Cl) < to W 8-62 I Llo�- wu El W 5 W -0 CL cn CD co z In_ 0 M3 cd :bf) 7:1 cr V) cg CL ui CL Cy Ca .E z E 0 "UZI > E Lij r UJ CL (0 .,7 ul vj 14 0 0 co rn P rp —4 v-, uj o CL F- 7D- 'Ci Of) cJ 0 o 0 0 Lvil P%4 I-- z LU LU U) (n z ui E CO- IrM� • z 4� m CIA 0 C 41 0) E CL tV QS E a 2- CIA LLI Kn yf cn cn < 4 J- ) E :3 E 0 r 0 p 0 >: LU .0 :CL. W iR tU E cn 0 00 crA AM ry ui Yil Q) z5 c1 G tj to 0 :bf) CL -j 0 o to �5 61, od tj 'n El C w fn. o En :J 1 Cd cl- m LLI 0 bf, bli t) 4 44 r Q) sc3 CID F-4 V, Q> o 0 V) El o � Q E .2 ds 0 E M 0 0 0 0 2 > E < 0 w w 2 crA AM C] 0 I-om (14 O E 0 0 LU w Z 0 w w dl LLJ 40- LLI C) w CL 11j (L > tz 0 0 z > E LU z F- z E (1) U0 LL LU E Z F- 0 I-om (14 O E 0 0 I-om (14 O -W W MA mo 0 LL U) 0 z LLI V) LLI C6 LLJ 2 z 0 z Eli z ■ cs L- m z c 0 E a) ns �E C 0 > E UJ < .E E C 0 0 0 > tp LU 0 r CL : . GJ CL m E 7i B .0 U O 0 ca c Attachment 4 to Report PSD' 083-11 O Hm 0 Lu > E w CL (D F7 < tV C) C) c" ct cn 0 r 0 kl) E a W 0 0 C? 0 0 CD tl7 H 0 P c a iL En E3 r 6 to ®rl V) blvi ui C3 4) A CIO F- Z' a 0 t,4 L) z -P- 0 E LLI -P1 F 0 bb LIJ: > U > .c LU W Ob LU E 0 11-4 V ct w 0 .cr LU W Ln cz CO 0, F- cc -0 4:2 Q) 72 > E 0 7 t r >0 E3 -4. C) u 0 q1 a 0 c-. z N a :P V l C" E- - Vi Cc, 0 .2 > a) c < w w O Hm I- ul LEJ Z 0 F- U) 0 CL 0 cD Z F- z uj 0 u 3: LU LU iL z 0 I 8-67 ra O (D 73 0 4� a) .0 4, tlS I 19 m 41 E 0 > E c UJ U) in < E > C LU 0 0. 0 CC E 0 0 ('-,I Z LU t Lu 0 > Ul cr- —0 0 CA 0 7j -0 P —M < 0 a -C/} 'Z� �41 > U bl) 41 1 d a ia) bb 0 0 Q) 5 V, x m IL z a: -2 0 x 0 7 P- I—Q Ill t 0 (n 0 m A 74 c- CL C, M P4 -4 al ra L) F- (D 1— < =S DO ItJ UD 0 r., 6, 0 75 Om 0 z bf) b- r-4 V 10 0 ( ti qJ a o 'A 0 cn CL" E L U v 'In tio — 0 v �11 >� 0 1 0 , C. Q) q 0 r�4 to v, (D 0 lu 72 .;q ts-i �l to 0 m 0 C) < Cl 0 di C. V CQ ei) C.- 12� o 11 - r iw 4 ZJC-,� 0 Iz, 14 rr, Cl) ri 0 bp C, L >0 co m 0 0 1w ca z N cu a) U) 0 E rn 0 ('-,I ti w z U) 0 CL a) 'Al r— z LU Lu (f) z uj n z z LL.J. . z ui D LL ui w z 0 . F-- (D z w C) 0 Z C 0 4, L.. 1.02 C 0 CU Cil .E 0) E 0 QS E UJ "a CD c .M 0 0 0 " > ;E LU 0 CL 4) CL = E a E 4) �m 0 Z Qy z LMU F-7 Oy 0 > L—i E: Lu 0 C�- C6 ca Coll 6i p V (D p V) 0 � I +3 t) n- I cu CD t-,b 0 LU ca x L-O C) -0 r 0 V.) g 0 0 M A tG ,- F- CL U) cw� cc C) -0 0) 0 C-1 45 >, h C) W) W3 0 D bID 'V 0 uj C) uj c 0 > 0 0 ct LU GT ui to 161, .2 0 C;L 'cl ca ri 0 0 0 -C, °« ' .W C) LY C) U) . 0 < bc 0 0 "ZI -0 bb ol, C 4; cz CO C: C 811 CU lt� 0 V 'ZI b L) (D > co m 0 1W Ell E m z N E 0 J7 G to 3 U Q 0 0 0 -0 �p 0 > E Sf �m z 0 F- t z U) uj 0 CL U) ❑ z w 0 {l} W 0 0 < Lu z 5: w W n .w Z 0 ul z 0 z w Z 2 z < W 0 D LL Z 0 z Loolm, RS u 0 41 tam O E E (D E 4c) CS U 0 0 o &- > LU 0 t .m a) a E U) U � z ..b Z 0 (D El 1-1 t uj 0 LU M W -0 'o _0 en ca CD 0 tit Imo! L/ N a < ui -0 2 -0 jv zi rD 0- CN 0 N (D N z x o C> Z, 0 o Tr 0 0 CL L) LU uj 0 LU 0 U) cl- E 0 Ill T- 0 0 > LU Ul trl 5. 0 41. 41 z E -2 0 0 W V.) 0 0 �p E w z 0 F- co 0 a. z z w 0 uj uj w 0 cat 0 .4� z c 40- 4) air CL ug to a 4, 0 > E LU :0 0 0 > w t 0 U fl 0 C). 0 UD 8-70 o Z LU ly (n A) 0 0 o t1b —zl 79 q o tr 0 ;8 -d W z d) 0 0 r rs C) t bo P 'C' o 0 p 0 r-L CL rL 6 of L) F- Eu D .Z, w < 0 = Q, 0 D 4) tn 0 LU 0. > uj, > Lu LLJ 0 0 r- LU 0 'D 0 w O '2 to '0 < o ) V) _0 0 T- 0 P 0 > E5 E5 V� e P- 0 0 'o V) V) 0 Ca 0 C- ro eve v 0 0 E) 0 .0 c 0 ry di . ILI > < 0 0 UD 8-70 Lim CD 0 qs CAS 0) 0 .1" > E a w cn < E fU E c 0 > ui E p U) C E u ai 0 a) 0 (5i O a) Z (D Z El 1= w E 0 IL 7C3 (14 0 CLD p. 0 w 0 iC zt QO O 0 0 CL co Lr, -C cr z , ui cl) z In 0 z Z) -V a) E LU a — t)Tj c t�6 W E LU v � v 0 C) 0 .0 0 DO —0 o ;> C, 2�1 Lj C� 17, > C14 0 a bf; 0 w w Gj LP Q 0 "T- u r 4 C4 0 o Irf 0 U) .0 O 0 ui LU uj (L L KO Z Z c 0 0) RY C 0 �E cu fl Lu U) CD C M 0 ,w E 0 c in p > t 4- 0 Q. C: 0) :cL E 3 = cn 0 0 O 8-72 z o CL CL CJ El 0 0 C) e to Ul c M IL3 X LID z t 0 5� 0 P a_ cl T. cz ni L) w uj P � E, z E w — C > LU bt LLI Ell cv bfj ct I— H 0 tol 0) [] r, _o 73 cu w U G 2 0 O 8-72 • 8 --73 0 C) 0 ai 10 E 4-A 41 c a) E a, .0 E W > 0 0 0 " 0 O ir 0 CD 0 0 0 00 z uJ 2 0 UJ Ca CL 0 0 0 0 W 41 vj 0 N 17� UJ z 00 J -n, rp, -q- t) co O 4 CL CH. 9) CL U) L'S v_i t1b ID till S r- cu twj ,w 0 co 0— 0 C) 0 ul c-, 0 CL 0 :4 Ci. 0. 0 0 -- UO Fi cj r: r, LU > E3 0 w Z: u 0 04 ay LU 0 7�i C, t'.) bil 70- < P; 0 co 5 0 0 E -43 Q m 0 0 '0 0 r4 0 T cl- A� E O m c CD 0 00 t w z X z 0 2 . Z t V UJ 0 a. 4. z Lu (n / � cl) E # � \ > uj E Z 0 LU 'S a. z > z LLI > E z m\ Lu � �k\ 0 LL 0 E S %E LL 0 LLJ 0.0 Z E Z- 0 � \� Z 0 tp F: C m ow] / /� 9 CD 14 8-74 ]� � $ \ #� / / ® ƒ_ � 8-74 t 0 0 cn Z Z llt 0 u 3: LLJ 5: 1 w Cy uj w CL z .0 z U- 0 0. 8 -75 Attachment 5 to Report P'SU-083-11 c- 0 tJ 71- 0 f V-1 u KL E tr; CL .uj U) CD U) C LLJ 0 a) x w 0 U) C) CY) E Z CL EU P CL o (1) to LLI .0 0 UJ r.L E P, Z z co I w :E 0 z E > 0 != z > E LU LLJ c uj 5 ui ul (t) .2 W E z 0 r- LLI w 0 0 * LIJ u t i E cz� CD U) E r E c-3 0 W -fl LL 0 LU CL E E g 0 z ca m 0) w E .0 r, CL 0 U C E z E T5 0 D M M V) 0 0 E 0 5 0 a) < E c- r— z w U) U) w ) U) C/ z uj 2 z 0 z w z w m IL .w w .z 0 F— (D -Z 0 I- :3 O 40— M CL E E Lu _0 on > 0 0-0 CL E B 4 0. :1Z 0 c 0 0 '3 t • Is Co a) Z OE 0 > a. 01 0: o (n 2 >- cl >� , ED < Q) L) LR z, '5! 1-4 x 0, Oh 0 0 0 CCL L bli 0 > d r V) C: C: w 10 > v Z nzi tf) :5 bli (D Z 0 0 0 af CL 0 0 10 tj 0 as 0 GO U V 0. -0 U) CD C� 0 r�o LU > :3 >' p 1U -,g cz, 0 �-- .r- 0 z 0 'ZI to 0 C'J D o V, ltt� z V 0 LU en VI U u 5 r w > ZI Z LU C' > 10 5 0 E 0 M _j (n 1. @ N U 0 — -ZI 0 :p C v ch "i 0 4 t:-- 41 (d r t" 0 qs Cl O y. 0 d) > M 0 0 cl 0 E > CL 0 C'j z tn C'i 'N M 0 0 > • Is rt 8-77 O z CD iE a) 0 0 > :E UJ VS iii 62 > ui qq t 0 CL E 42 C 0 0c c a) 0 a) no Z LU 0 .w 0 LU cn CL) Q) CV k7-- —0 E Ell 0 0 CD 12 0, E3 LO c-, cn CL rh 0 tr, z C-� Ed CL cz; Ltd 0 x 3 00 cu rq 0 LO 0 t p Jc to Cd 0 0 4t U3 0 w L) 41 tr -�= C-1 0 E cd uj > w uj O Cu 0 E 0 cn 0 bl N70 C C�, rD- 0 ly Q) E 6 ;j cd tr, 75 CO 0 0 I'd E 0 rn cl V3 0 0 7u 5; LG LU JMA f7- z LU 2 ul F- z LU :E z 0 z ui z ui C/) LL ui w z 0 C) z O SV sW 7= Im D 0 EGV id CL E Ql fir. NI td E (D E 0 .E LiJ 0 C CL = E U E 0 4) 0 0 C\ N- c mm z w z 0 a) Z Z CD El -'z' E] El 0 E CL tn. CI > (D V L) 0 0 [;�� L) VN F7 L6 0 E o o 0 CL ap z 0 P, 0- Fj ix U Nt uj z C" r- 41 D E z 0 C 0 w > > ui LLI .E L4 0 C LU 0 0 LU 6 E 0 10 nL m 00 m ER :3 4 0 0 0 pA CL L- 0 0 -0 00 0) U) d� C\ N- c mm F_ w LU r U) z 0 V) 0 z F_ z 0 uj W LU uj CL z 0 (D z LL 0 CL Q z LOORWO C) -N, 0 Ri z 40- E rL E O.0 w E LU -0 c 0 U) 3 E C ° ui c CL E U) 0 0� 0 p U) C:.c (D 4� E E = (3) Q:C 0 (3) 00 a .a) Z (D Z z D� ul �: 2 . El 3: T > 1:1 E w 0 a. � (n o < cv 0 0 CL CL Q) c Z Q) Z Cc) 0 65 o. 0 p CL Ul) (6 LL cl LLJ ti" LU .2- In, O 2 -7j ca 71 > 73 t2 0 uj -ZI :cv- 0 -71 00 (D sc n L o E3 C_j U) M rA E cn ti J 17- a) 0 o. > a LLI LU x cn z 0 0 11 CD z z LU E ;E 0 LLI w Ix uj LU a. z 0 z U U- 0 a. .5 z C:D 0 L) z C 0 CD 4� S 0 cu a E E 0 > U) U? E E 0 0 0 %- > L t: U CL CL :3 E W = — U) E = W 0 C: 0 0) Im 0 (-f DOW-& 0 '7 :0 Z w W 5: �3.: n 2 :� O LL 05 0 >1 h toe >1 a- -0 a) (D >T L 0 v,,j L) < CS a -4 0 CL 0� LD r-, IV) w CL o eu 0 a) bfj LLI W LU :t, Ott ix 2 ro E LU 0 c 0 ul U w w 6i 2 a) E 0 bf. CL to 4R Lo wj tw '76 Z v O ct -ZI w E cz Z kr) w o u -L t¢ 0 0 C) -j 0 EP 21 0 .2 11 * > 5 < 0 M 15 (-f DOW-& ul w rpT� v! z 0 cn 0 d Cf7 C:3 z Q z w 0 Ul ul W ct { {L['-` • a ul . a. z U lt. 0 CL z 8 -81 N s r I • 0 U :O u M Z fl d Q1 C Q1 ii M a w 0 c W "O C Q t `#m+ E c O 0 o LU O 'a. �} C. L C L /0 0 +.i c I� t. a a o C? w Q w o Q en a a a c m ¢ ¢ Ql �J N 4 'r O- � r3 + 7 0 d r. CL 'EUj 0 r 2 C O 53 Cr C � � U � ;�, y` � � • 7 CD O} r -. O Q� r v .� �?. n CL n ui cn N 5 vi G W . ❑ J W R to .- h v St3 rh >, .w © c � :� 2j d = p 17 LU 0 C1 Q "" U , -G >< r d3 c3 > , G i G ti ♦ � - .l � o .rte+ Cd r.',^ `•': y�}., •-+ " Qk 0 JVj Ci' �.. .� '.� [ Vr ��e�j�r W 1.J Q o 'C •v� J 7-: cz J h t Lo u ,1 '> w r HO ca v, b v Z r ye >` ,� .� � J U �� x^�.. c• -�-r -� C`A`S '� r^�4 o v F� U o a o o 'G u Ci7 J J rt Z3 T3 G y 47 Q U S�-4. '-' .-+. •.� W co O -3rf1 r fs .I�i gUj' u 4y G l� C.1 u7 N tr r 'n r • G �L. •� Q'' O t�� .ue A U R C,? Q C U 4 Y L° A 1 C +v 0 ? C`-}3 M bb hI O O GO ` '> C T. �t /Q��T 0yf) V I w G� c I� z ui U) co .z ui E z 0 z LU Z ul U- ui w z 0 z C:) cv 0 b. IW yM 4) -C E M a E E a, 0. E w U) U) E E 0 0 > Lu CL w yyyyy Vl E 0 w 0 (D C\ 2;-� .01 Mel A 0 0 Z Z z ul E 0 ' 'In r7 -0 E cc VII cd CL = ci3 0 C) G 0 w x 4) (D 0 0 0 C 0 0 A c M 0 0„ 0 P Z a, CL Lo a bb L) bli IL c� 0 0 .- th, ❑U 0 0 P-4 US cu by 0— E-0 0 0 Q LU cz 4,5 E E E) E vi _j N cy) rA LO p x, cn C.,- E c) E > bb E 03 E. uv Sri z :3 M 0 0 C/) "T bia al 0 _j 0 0 2— 0 > CD C\ 2;-� .01 Mel A a "t C) 0 tai z C 0 rZ tU of M Iz 4� E W trr V> E 0 62 > C: w t 0 it E 46 pal 0 4- 6- CD 0 r_ 0 0 Im 0 o CL Q z CD 0 LO u 0 CL co LU 0 F- z bo 0 0 ri. (D CU CD cz tn R < C:) E 0 0 z ui U) ul co U) .j z LLI 2 z 0 z LU F- I;pF Z ul r U) co ui w z 0 F- . r� ttS E E > E a w 015 CL CL 0 E m M 0 E is M� MME, Z P fL C3 o V) 0 E3 t CL 0 0 Q f4 bZ Z3 z AD al O IL 0) m LO C4 C6 p) ryN P Ni CL r p tu) N Cd z < 0 UO w CO p z A 44 0 4;l 0 P, w Sli t—i� M , C-d vs V) 0 E V, � *TJ Z:j •Ll, Ul N a — U 0 C? 0 E 0 Lu cd 0 se N 8.2 .2 Ell t: LU m cn 6.1 On 6� CQ to o 6) C(3 C/I m 14, jj -E Ed m U U) g CD E to r (D 0 MME, ei 8-85 C) .0 z c 0 4-4 cu 2 4 ca M E 7i E w VJ E 43 U 0 02 > 0 CL a) E CO 4- fr. 0 41 n. c 0 0 Z Z w F] aJ ul 0 CL (n Im T 4_1 ob fl bli L2 V) 0 0 CD z LLI W F- bli 0) Q) z CD a L? 0 tz CL LO cLo l LU 0 > D > 0 z 4.8 Q,4 w w LU to w V) E LU 15 CL 70 LU CLO -o 0 ro 7-- Cli t6 _zz P. U ca CD cn lu Z� c CL QM CL z N CD th D V� 0 L) > W w E n. c w N fli .LU CL /T/�ory 02 0. C-5 D. E 1 y • Y e� a r • o r T N U ro n g� tl�+ }yE ++F^^ Y/ Q C ,C W t0 N 6 0 C •� W Ns 0� 95 2 I CI N n w G n Asm •o 0 a 0 4� t"1 ai m b a o� � CL M O a .c N (� V G E aYi � � �•- � O �; •bg3 u Q u td 0 d a •c U � A '� � �j ►u ui ;��1 � 'c1 '� td .Q •Q% r� � i� � 11 M •E � � � Q ,Y •r�i i�l .E•+ � 4 pO n w G n Asm MM C) is itS 0 0 :E 7ia 4 C " CO < E > t E oi 4-1 M C A) C Attachment 6 to Report PSD-083-11 (0 z Lu W — >u 0 L fr M W C4, z 0 5 cS tQ Z. CQ 0 NN 0 Cw 0 4 CL V) —P Cn LL c,l C) Cl 'n bb w 0 nn o-, 0 0 z 0 -,j CL t o w U 1-4 ci 0 CJ a) w .5 U) > W, • 21 < zo 0 0 Z (1) CO 0 > '0 u (D E U o c (2, 0 0 C 0 .2 4.1 < (0 LLI m I E2 LL. .0 CL U z F- z Li n V) U) F- z LU r5 z .0 z LU z M (1) LU, W z 0 F- 0 z C) 0 ,S sW 0 to E z 0 E C 4� 0 E OS E > W t 0 tz 4) :;7, E fu. 0 (P O W 0 E (n uj > 0 ul b CL ZD OL >- C) d 1/,! < rr 10 0) m L5 t7— cr t:3 czl ri tf, th N rz-- a u 2 cz$ Cl— a) o = — —u 7Z$ �� r) -,- r—I " 11 - C/I , (Is o (1) E z Lu 0 P 7:, :3 - i ✓ 0 - , V, i ' fj 0 z Ul CL aj o 'R: w � 6) LLI Ci AM, v lA LLI ca co -0 Ln ::,, 4-, ca J qj r m -0 -53 . 0, co 0— 0 cz 14, M m Lp r) "0 0 CL Rr, V) CO tTS cz C-11 4 0 Eoe 16 4 —.0 -b) cu 0 0 ii td `Ci O LU m 5; Ui w mm Z C 0 M 0 E a) 41 U CL E RS E C: 4, 0 > a RS 0 0 0 L- > O C. E Z It 0 Z �z 2 a 0 > > > to LU fy- O to CP it 0 0 :D C: .0 C x w z 0 .z CO 0 0 a 4 0- 2 CL . FT a) Ci qv E -Z cs LU 0 0 Q CL CL p uj 5 uj ct .2 Ili 0 rf. cn a) F- U, tCi I„ Q > 0 U) :7) r (1) < m o CO 0 ZI IF 0 —cl (a M u u E O co Z N In i� 0 .0 0 E3 c L 0 0 C.) LU ui +S W z D 2 LL) s w 1� i �r C? {�1 U Q (D z d 0) W �.a i W U) la C. ;E Q ''' E w N c 0 M! 'E E O a o _ C .O {fy M E 2I, 0 T f lb co k-- G� ' •1 Z n 0 G � :n .c a -0 0 ❑ a 0 FA LO xi G N r! C9 p a r i _ bti © C;S G p w G t Z Z n O L) J GIJ U cJ 0 CL Lt[ cl CL v U 0 rlx U) r 0 Z Z U U y ul H a^), H UuJ {�fi L}Li J r j �U O % /yi f iw o Y '� ��+! r ` C F .d rJ ri O).uti "75 r� ti•, N ''. u Q G ,. r L7 n .n.. a) a a.�ay z CL W a o o QS Q d S v ti to CL '� tlsi E co k-- G� ' •1 Ul T z Q F- Q a. wi z uJ w r l 1! t 1.01 1 T- CJ N U Q l.. tt3 is z C 0 0) Y4 O .E 0 (Y9 ((S Q'I C E C ,r O � C � V C cn ? w 4 CL w E tf? U `a .L y(ii SM 4. 0 (U c CD 0 LO Z UJ w co O c CL C¢ r U d U ILJ c> cf 1 t ,p v � �) co > N -0 c7i i G u r, v x G Lri for' L-a Q) i 75 C, En Zn O i2 G m r t� a �i ". cD a CL W Q W '.:' v, t7 Z fJ p U r Q) • oW afi ED ca N UJ b G� J t%> v w a o GS Q Raiff. -U H '� © cC v 'O : U 15 v >N ar, (E3 tj U tn p u u a-, i � 0. r ti ti v 0)> c r c� o a e 60 0 o (9 RS f:z c UJ r Q Z 4 V 0= rC?r rJ1 a� !i V V a ti C{ I R� w 0 Ldn S/J W . CD 0 LO w tu 10-11 �14 Ml z 0 z U- 0 z uj LEJ U ) z uj z 0 z uj z uj tla M LL LLI w z 0 z to z c 0 0) 40- d) r- d) W m tr E 0 0 t 0 (j) E E as 0 4y k Lu ZP; 'M - r4- 8-93 ReportPSD- 083 -11 O V- V- N Z 2 tr Lij v 0 CL u_s _ C7 U L U t{j .._....... a7 P ) ... G .r U 2 to U .-`0 a,, v C r v y Im 7 iti C CO � p a„ (14 , cu x u Lu W r -' at a , r U) e ; a A O F- 'U 0 o CL co r U U O a. Ga CL 0 F" J W' r cwt y� CL 9i c� E, a C Z�¢ •> E� G1 : > O p '�..a y � w �' #L' y 3 t7 J p QJ U W v o .5 E C w CU O tt G!) E v CL 0 j) } P 4 ; v � 0 0 Q 0 r r UJ [0 O CL tU ( cJ U � w U ` Q •G chime v Npy fj O U U? i.w 4i bb Imo., qJ 4- U Qs C CIO 4S of v O V- V- :E • OR Cy c 0 sV Qi z c .2 CD II c E 2 E c w 0 _L tl1 > E c 1 (n uj KtS E E 0 .0 > E 2 = 0) u rz 0 0 00 ml H-OMOM ui 71 v cl— 7D °' 1-0 21 0 71 ap CL E; CL ul to L) M, C� 7, w > C) M = — �= co p —, L) 41 Al 0 r_ LU ul � � 4- C) 0 > 41 el) CL co tj c-, 511 u rl CL bf) �5 P; c O w E u 0 _j 0 0 c C-q ml H-OMOM t a • r • 8-•95 C`J CD U a z C O Li? It 0 k. O 0 Vl U O. A m c C tC E cN G U � C3� C O L2. M U O 4- u Of Oi ai pi wfi a� 0 0 c`7 N � N Z � Z a w 0W � CL v dV Q� co ,: c/] a C nJ cl •Uj N tli x :fir y w .. v 41 cU ✓ h a U3 c p rry cis O h° a a~ FJ v` g J a c P v aNi La � Es_ V) C 0 v CL _ C1 y E U b H (Ij a ai qz q y qj U> cu w iG A y N N 4i r C3 C z G p O o E LU r u .. •� ,..-. .iJ I LCai H "a vim~-. t"rl �rJi C. cz C7 9J r 1 ✓ C/? y W U y r ^a N C � D a G> ui a Q rJ � C, U a1 Q —4 1 •--+ .-1 1 C4 (� d � Cri .•.% M kt a e7 0 n� VII W � O 0 0 c`7 iR z C 0 0) 0 ui U) 85 E V) V) 4� E cD E C: 0 ;E CL CD E 0 (D Do um 0 a) Z z 1.0 2 a w X L6 75 C A) > —5 uj r z 0 U) C) a. LLI U) LO m 70- U z -W C D z En 0 iu Lu > LU 0 0 C) 0 r-i LLI > 0 LU w ti w LU CL U~ --4 0 rn z to 0 f 7i3 Q -7j) 0 Z 0 -zj V, N cl C C'i E 0 z I 0 '5; (D w um i i 8 - -97 r• O N U 0 z i 0 .FJ 0 44 tlk 0) t� CL Tii E-. a r C E W N M E U E C: 0 C o CS.t > L UJ O 0-0 cL E u JX E Q 0 b m o a Z Z W r m CUJ 00.. N �' `-7N r N� / Q C{S _._... _.....___._ _..........___-- is L> j > G a tau - rn v} bli �% v? n � Vi G � J �:l U U l rd -V v x 'G Q y�) � ,Q w 0) +..3 0 �1`-+ .U-, 2y rte+ .. [•} O r vii G a U a H_ m q �. p to 0 c Z C. CO C tR 4 U o o p 0 p b O . C3 '•'. LEI m 5 N_ C? ✓ [ D Y > U E G r o Ei cma O 4 ? r `" n C R, Q? hf f: s" ru L' } ar r j u yr J y J V U f W r , i�., _.. •--. �f) �a 'fir, G Irr O Ll. " `` ._ 'n U U .n v '5 N ( C n ++ r 45 2 t,_. p' d 4 C G d r� F� r r y ti 2 r tc v ell C J 'L7 .0 tp pL c1 C L G 4J G CA N "D .0 c f`! r'a C Q) c� _J G a C . cll cis Et# o aY H QC/] C/'J w r 00 tL cc U1 Gi b m am if 0 0 0 0 Min 420 c +1 0 E iil RS CL RS EIi Ld E a> E 0 0 > ui 0 M E 4) 4✓ E u 0 O "401 am Z Z as El O 0 W CL F7 0 0 .2 C FV a) f:4.— 2 c co C5 r_ fn 0 :o CL CO t CL 0 r-I CL 410 0 cr C.- CIO.) Ln 0 w D ct D 0 U 0 41 u t -C E5 v o E C) W c 0 4� > .Z t > of) -;I > u —v —8 E5 C-1 0 x 0 . -d :3 2 C) .0 o *1 z 0 0 a5) E > It O "401 am a M Fi A V ✓ p4E�d :f / z U) U F- Z LLI W UJ z LIJ CIJ 0 LU L +r� Z rte' ® w Z F- Z W -j 0 ca Ci. LL G w .z Ix �J. am C) N D t� CT z C 0 t-+ t., d 4- d1 W 4.4 U C1 -� N { {> :E W 'A S�.t7u L +� Q C W O " R. v Q t- U (� 1 E no r i� � Q e> Z P 4} Z Z � LL) Q; n Q I I a w .0 CL U' L ^ G 4) SO U m G G 0 ; o C) Cal " cQ G to G ' .� v ct1 -r W v U sv x rj O CJ F U w v Z .0 N Q GS cc; 0 ¢ o? n F N r 0 d Gr rl C7 ❑ r v .v) il 'L3 Q to t�t'7� or �'�, Li v G z j .� Q N u ..'a, t lzn LU LU r J ,. '•� 'J a �' H J V: E N J1 U bJD 0 0 � U d � � � t`3 c 1 o i E of + c ._ y 4 Pf ,C 0 U 1 ^ cG r O r i tea cry C� r i� LLI Z 0 F- F- (1) . ul Z' .0 z Lij LU Cd z c 0 0) 1.0 U) Cl tC tU E = 4- 0 > E C VS tV Lu < 'D E 0 2 0 > 0 0-0 cL E .0 u 0 E E 0 :0 0 0 O K& 0 Z Z 0 El w 2 V) 0 m O ca dLi X wi P1 M z 0 0 Z 0 R to t 0 CL z K o" ;J C7. LU m > uj 0 LU > 0 bli C'- A. CL Lt 2 o 0 P. a) cy vj J 0 -6 Z N O ) C wo 4) O K& ui x M z 0 0 aL U) z LU 0 W cr W W (L z 0 0 z LL 0 C) z D :2 I 8-101 0 cJ 0 fC 0 0) E (D CL E Ic +1 c:, E LU tU 0 0 0 1- > 0 0-0 CL :3 E U) I-- oc Ql L. 0 0 to 0 0 0 Ell 0 0 W cn to CL W LO 0 < 0 0 ro 0 C', bf) co 0 x Cl) V N ( i Vi V LI4 W C yi E C") 0 CL r) �. — -4 C) F, v (d F-4 0 U) D -f-- v al cH cz tb LLJ CA 0. 0 tu ul t4 LU w 'S cz LU S.J. Z 0 (D 0 �7- aj CL -fj cd 4 v 0 ro -0 -C, p CZ U-1 .64 m 0 E a) LAI V) r2 Q) as r)4 E 0 Z • U) c 0 0, E Nf Ir 0 Z 0 0 CL Q R '_J ,Gh Uf Ul U/ z uj a ®! �I !li z LL L� 60 c°v O Q A G 4— fl. 110 ul t0 D WG h 'u c pC 0 a 8 -102 ono p r O N , o�i �3�iu CL lu d N 'cp Q q a o �' iiCy77 o am J a IL � a �ro A rv. a� E� ro ti 0 a 8 -102 I 8-103 tv Sly O E t m CL E a .0 r E UJ U) E = E U 0 0 > ;E LU 0 'CL CL E F(D r- E 0 W f)Qi Attachment 8 to Report PSID-033-11 0 4— Z 0 w P w ca < CD 0 U 4-d —C-. 0 bP (1) C) Cv '44 Cl, _, 0 V) 0 Q) U) W -4-1 q) q 0 V� z 'Ob CG t d—) 0 L) 0 4� 0 0— 0) CL U) 71 V) 0 , — cr 14 C) 0 U) W U) L) all ul 0 a) a) + 0 rul C) LL. (D V) 0) cs E F- G3 V. w Z LU U ;6 00 C Q r7 0 LO .0 V) w 0 0 :i5 v �L, 6 (1) v A' cn P, Cl) .,,) 06— e-e N 7;� rZ Vi Q) C) -�3 L) 7E LU > V) 0 b.0 ct lob i" (1) cl 0) In d) LU — 'P, il) P-, co 41 bb w .",q , E > 0 - r, r� 0 '0 u ,�, rz u 0 0 cn (0 0 V) bJtj C) 0 C) 4� '.0 G, In E 41 r4 tj "q m 0 0 0 0 (D > 10 P., CO co m D m -T L) 0 V) co rA 0 0 0 U C) w U) E .m a, O to) Z E � :3 LO U) 0 0 41 yy W 0 0 4— f i c �v U 0 L G3 U z C 0 t72 C �s CL A c C , O > F, E W T3 to C U � �y a Ci7 C C uj O CL C2. E U � aI C U C O 4? '^:Mw 8 -104 � 0 z z�'�w E w OT- 0 LU w n o� a a Q� Q sit ui Q G n ?, -. 4> _ k %r k u 47 v � � N v O U) C� 0 o q3 t?} . y a4 .D NbXt bo N C1Ti U) rr� a y x W z �. o t� r W U n U c' o R U C Gxi N i C�'" O _, q o� bJj r-�, ° O F" o s er Cl> O clu ✓� 41 IQ �,s r r C :v 'yam , U . P. '� v � U v C O n v t C7, ti v u W l y f 5 fi 'or 7� pan p m ?, Q }C�yU{1 1.i y 1-f +w b ( V �' ',--i W ' ..i !.-5 c) r v y.a.� rid-i� j 4- PP W:l 0 � !� 0 I " W 4} cv, tUj �+ sue. 'C f4 Q o a- Qr c�u O ���{{{ b[ V7 O N N UN �' v U ""' H Q�I 0 a 0 Q a� _" u c _ a 'm v 'zi co 'Ed p � R � N a M O U $ Ei1 LL —2 8 -104 cn a_ 0 z LOW iw z c 0 CT) 4) 42 E a) Cn4- U m iG E r- ,, rz (D :z E U C: 0 o 0 > Q LU 0 a tli E 42 .E 2 0 (1) ❑ CD 0 0 z U l F] Q > Ir 0 M CL L6 U) C) 0 bp ;71 0 a) u '0 u o w Cl) z 0 cd a. 0) v Ell 6 0 > t U) Cd .4- a 1 Q, 'r, � 0 ';U U) F- .z F- p V u ' w "t1 j LU V r4 rl - z V) 1-5 0 C) C) 0 41 r. 0 (1) bfj C) V, 41 LLJ CL VII LU E ree V) -e ol U5 w 0 E Go co a) In V) ,to > -0 LU CU, ed 0 0 u 0 jo (D cc fo 0 0 0 LU w -M W z 0 0 Wl U LL 0 (L 3 Z r— z ul (j) Cf) —j z uj IE z 0 z LU z Ul n U- LU w z 0 F- 0 z cki L) .0 aG 4-4 w U) Kt? m CL E I; C 0 > E LU E E .0 in s 0 - > Q cs cn F- 0 C E E 0 a) 0& CD 0 4— M Z Z Li 0 E 0 21 2 4-j 0 (D co U, rn '0 CU- fn , cz, (OrD z 0 0 ol z c cr 0 0 0 0 U> 0 CL co f. Q u —0 v L) C� 4:� U4 751 Ei ct? c z lit t ;.q 0 �p 0 0 LLI FL U) � < "0 U p 71 r- '4J V) tl E o U) vas LO P4 T, 4� co m 0 V 0 0 51 0 T A L) ... . . . . . ......... E -1 CCc z N E :3 B V ) V) :c m O a c G} Elf E CD 0 4— M 8-107 CD C) 0 z C 0 E r 'E w to 41 E -E 0 Cl Q > 0 tri E V) U ct: .0 Lo 0 (1) Z El ul 0 > w 0- cn cis m CIO C, < K-N 61) to -15 v 0 .r— f4 N Cv-n, C) .2 � 0 0 �7 ti Q> 0 p M cl r 0) CO bp 24 iDi 0 44 c 7j L) uj E5 > Q 6) > > LLI U) bh 0 ft 0 LU bF) P 2 0 r 0 0 o 0 0 LU 0 > 0 0 CE > 0 -IS E5 LLI 0 V'I co 4-1 (D CO fl: C .,- 0 iU Cl C> L,7, -z� C.- cz 0 8 60 6, 60 Vn v i=» f-,5 . N 0 kr) To lz m to 0 0 0 5 E T Lo F- z 0 t: V) 0 a_ Z z F- to r- uj n U) C/) uj F- z ui X. z 0 z ui F- z ui V) D U- ui w 0 z F- 0 0 0 m z c 0 0) .c 0 �O C .�: W >r_ E LU U) -0.0) > uj 0 E to E 0 0 no .C) b 0 z (D Z M z z w F 0 f1 (D W t > a> w cl� Of M V"i o < < clq 0) 0 m () 0 P, ❑ 0 V W) v xi 12 72 0 0 00 A) ui Ei cu co 5 4 4L .21 1z, "0 ui -0 z 'ZI LU co u z .0 LU Q) > 3: 41 -ci IL j C.) CIO I w CL 0 CD W tn 0 cp 71 CD U) J (v E lu 'fa. S. 0 0 ri 0 ca, bFj o @) 0 C/) L) r o > rt 4z w > CIO P-4 P, :0 rn E= :1 � 0 8 a, oil rn .0 Z;dj 0 0 P- CD a > ay .C) b 0 0 z lu 2 2E i. i floffime z .c 0 ftJ 0 tU 4-4 m 65 U RS CL its E. E E ui in < E E 0 0 n > LU 0 CL cL E 3 7F5 B O zp p E L. :0 Ci w UM, 0 � U, O.w 70 0 U3 Eo F71 N C) C\j L6 z -0 cr x LLI 0 a) bl) 7= bfl z 6 tj E CL Ts Ul G v r .0 tu C7 Q 0 LU E U tj E fa, � a) LID 81 'r, 0 w p != O cl, U) C3 in 0 71 12 C: r_ r. V, CD tt cz, . xi u r C trn CIJ jn Q 0 0 0 [E n, CIO C: 0 0 Q > w Ci w i • i CD N U 0 i. ti Z i O w Cn RL tC cll L SF- �a cti v G d� O .� Qi G E 0 0 d ". bS) L LU O G CL (D C 4- O ;r, O n to Q v- O Eel 8 -110 L a w ' o OUj q jo CL W -0 U) cc D ., .c v ti3 N VL' ci n W z 0 0 4�l � p N 'tfj Al x X5 CL G r r 6j fir— ! Z +1 m a W p y Ul L N r y 63 0 Cry} Jai H U LU ~ o r C i y 5 � ,-r D J r C•, _ Z yt 0 r Ci G U J C id C U: O i N ttS E O G?r3 ;Q U 1 .fil x •� U2 CfJ � b O 0 i- CD T,3 CD Q r Q v- O Eel 8 -110 LU r m wj t V) 0 0- U) W 8-111 0 C14 0 I.. Va z :a 0 L. 0 E w 0 U) ih 0 0 0 Jm > c C LU 0 E M n U 4— u C 0 0 c 0 0) 00 C) 0 z El 0 p. V\j �yy 44. C; biJ ro 0 0 0 Z5 FJ fn -0 4 vi X Z 0 o U) tr LLI U CI- L) z nt 0 m w m Q) Xj 0 0 Ol N 9 w L) CZ w ♦ w Q) E > o 0 w U) > 0 V) c cz (D > a) tn E ;J co &5 ,td bU Q3 AU Q3 u E :0 Ott z N :3 On 11 0 0 y > r: c < a) -,- o w ±12 C) 0 z z w 0 Q) 3: LLI CZ w LU Ul CL Z U. 0 *7 z LU LU ui 2 z 0 z uj F- LU. T LL Lli w z 0 C.). am O al .c 0 E UJ C7 it Ql lY o is C) 0 8-112 0 0 E 0.9 cl K O 0 0 wi 00 03 CF) w lu a 40 r: in LL E U w (4 0 th Im 0. Sal Ql lY o is C) 0 8-112 Meeting GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: October 17, 2011 Resolution By-law : Report EGD- 035 -11 File #: II *0101 _kViTyilAT � = It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report EGD- 035 -11 be received for information. Submitted by: ASC /bb Reviewed by: F klin Wu Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T (905)623 -3379 F (905)623 -1824 9 -1 REPORT • PAGE 2 1.1 With respect to the Building Permit Activity for the month of SEPTEMBER 2011, Staff wish to highlight the following statistics for the information of Committee and Council. N 8 = 2011 2010 BUILDING CATEGORY NUMBER OF PERMITS VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF PERMITS VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION % CHANGE OF VALUE 2011 -2010 Residential 56 $10,884,630 61 $10,110,312 7.7% Industrial 1 $80,000 0 $0 N/A Government 1 $15,000 0 $0 N/A Commercial 3 $426,000 3 $145,000 193.8% Institutional 2 $75,000 2 $210,000 - 64.3% Agricultural 0 $0 0 $0 N/A Demolition TOTAL 3 66 $0 $11,480,630 20 86 $0 $10,465,312 N/A 9.7% 2011 2010 BUILDING CATEGORY NUMBER OF PERMITS VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION NUMBER OF PERMITS VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION % CHANGE OF VALUE 2011 -2010 Residential 687 $140,816,297 699 $125,300,567 12.4% Industrial 9 $53,065,000 5 $2,102,125 2,424.4% Government 6 $486,000 3 $2,470,700 -80.3% Commercial 47 $19,482,235 40 $24,893,259 -21.7% Institutional 17 $2,879,125 25 $12,636,900 -77.2% Agricultural 13 $763,716 17 $2,322,118 -67.1% Demolition TOTAL 26 805 $0 $217,492,373 56 845 $0 $169,725,669 N/A 28.1% '' 1.2 With respect to building permit activities (over $250,000) and large residential building permit activities, the details are provided a$ follows: Owner / Applicant Construction Type Location Value MCDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF Interior & Exterior 1,000 REGIONAL RD 17, CLARKE $376,000 CANADA Renovations (McDonald's 9 -3 REPORT XO.: EO®- ®35 -11 PAGE 4 The following is a comparison of the types of dwelling units issued for the month of SEPTEMBER" and "YEAR TO DATE ". Dwelling Unit Type "SEPTEMBER" 2011 0 Anarf•mPnt 23 Townhouse 52% I I Single Detached 21 H Selnl- Detached 0 Tovviihouse 23 0 Apartment 0 21 Single )etached 48% 0 Semi- Detached 0% Dwelling Unit Type "YEAR TO DATE= 2011" 4 119 Apartment Tovailiouse - - - - 1% 24% 3 05 70 Single Semi- Detached Detached - =— -: 61% 14% 1 Single Detached 305 A Semi - Detached 70 A Townhouse 119 A Apartment 4 The following is a historical comparison of the building permits issued for the month of SEPTEMBER" and "YEAR TO DATE" for a three year period. i- gtodka� Dzatar� for Month of �`�� 9 SeptePetbre " $40,000,000 - — ------ - -- $35,000,000 - -- $30,000,000 $ 25,000,000 - $20,000,000 -- $15,000,000 -- $10,000,000 -- $5,000,000 - 2011 2010 2009 Value $11,480,630 $10,4G5,31Z $34,106,891 9 -4 Historical Data "YEARR TO DATE" $250,000,000 I-- -- - - 1 $200,000,000 1 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 20112010' 2009 Value $217,492,373 $169,725,669 1 $98,167,042 REPORT i PAGE 5 2011 2010 . September Year to Date September Year to Date PERMIT FEES $82,019 $1,475,303 $68,300 $1,228,721 8L MA WA 111W 2011 2010 September Year to Date September Year to Date Building Inspections 583 4,503 549 4,112 Plumbing & Heating Inspections 746 5,094 557 4,156 Pool Enclosure Inspections 7 59 12' 83 TOTAL 1,336 9,656 1,118 8,351 TOTAL 2011 2010 September Year to Date September Year to Date Single Detached 21 305 27 277 Semi - Detached 0 70 6 88 Townhouse 23 119 0 101 Apartments 0 4 0 19 TOTAL 44 498 33 485 � MRMIAMI YEAR: 2011 (to end of 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 AREA September Bowmanville 200 282 98 340 451 609 307 587 468 345 312 Courtice 245 236 113 134 82 126 241 173 180 133 129 Newcastle 31 37 24 60 77 84 202 191 123 131 76 Wilmot Creek 4 8 9 30 16 15 15 25 29 .38 24 Orono 1 1 0 2 1. 1 1 2 0 1 0 Darlington 4 8 6 10 6 7 14 15 13 17 47 Clarke 7 6 11 5 11 12 13 10 16 15 9 Burketon 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 Enfield 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Enniskillen 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 5 Hampton 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 1 1 Haydon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kendal 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 2 Kirby 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leskard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Maple Grove 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Mitchell Corners 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Newtonville 3 7 5 7 2 2 4 5 3 3 0 Solina 1 1 5 0 6 3 3 3 3 1 1 Tyrone 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 9 3 TOTALS 498 593 274 593 655 861 802 1,015 1 843 701 609 IM-0-01 2. CONCURRENCE -Not Applicable CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN - Not Applicable Staff Contact: Rick Pigeon, Chief Building Official Date: October 17, 2011 Resolution #: By -law #: Report #: ESD- 014 -11 File #: Subiect: MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - JULY, AUGUST, SEPTEMBER 2011 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report ESD- 014 -11 be received for information. Submitted by: Reviewed by: Gord Weir, Director of Emergency Services GW /mb Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1 C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 11 -1 REPORT NO,: ESD- 014 -11 1. BACKGROUND PAGE 2 Report ESD- 014 -11 covers the months of July, August and September and is intended to provide Council with relevant, timely information on the activity of the Emergency and Fire Services Department.. 2. COMMENTS The Department responded to 854 calls during this three month period and recorded total fire losses of $1,104,251. Attachments 1, 2 and 3 provide a monthly station response summary, description of call types, a call type summary, a dollar loss summary, an enforcement summary & a public education summary. 3. CONCURRENCE — Not Applicable CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Mark Berney, Deputy Fire Chief Attachments: Attachment 1 — Activity Report — July Attachment 2 — Activity Report — August Attachment 3 — Activity Report — September 11 -2 Attachment #1 to ESD- 014 -11 CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT PERIOD: July 1, 201100:00:00hrs - July 31, 2011 23:59:59hrs L u- L STATION RESPONSE SUMMARY „ STATION 1 STATION 2 STATION 3 STATION STATION 5 THIS Bowmanville Newcastle Orono 4 Courtice Enniskillen MONTH THIS 152 33 17 67 5 274 MONTH TO DATE 1077 221 131 507 91 2027 ,r T Fire and Explosions: Instance or destructive and uncontrolled burning involving structures, vehicles and open area fires, including explosion of combustible solids, liquids or gasses which may or may not have resulted in a dollar loss or an explosion or rupture as a result of pressure, no fire Outdoor, No Loss Fires: Uncontrolled fires, outdoors, that did not result in a.loss, injury or fatality and is not suspected to be caused by arson, vandalism or children playing Pre Fire Conditions: Incidents with no fire that involve heat or potential pre fire conditions e.g. pot on stove, cooking - smoke or steam, lightening, fireworks Burning (controlled): Complaint call related to outdoor controlled burning, authorized or unauthorized. Fire Department did not take suppression action. False Fire Call: Alarm activation or fire call that when investigated, is determined to be as a result of equipment failure, malicious /prank, perceived emergency, accidental activation of alarm by a person CO (carbon monoxide) False Call: a call where it is determined that the detection equipment malfunctioned or there was a perceived emergency - no CO leak Public Hazard Call: Includes a response for spills and leaks of a hazardous product such as natural gas, propane, refrigerant, miscellaneous /unknown, gasoline or fuel, toxic chemical, radio - active material, power lines down or arcing, bomb, explosive removal standby, CO (carbon monoxide) or other public hazard. Rescue Call: a call for a person in danger due to their proximity to the occurrence and who is unable to self evacuate and is assisted by Fire Department personnel i.e. vehicle accident, building collapse, commercial /industrial accident, home /residential accident, persons trapped in elevator, water rescue or water /ice rescue. Medical /Resuscitator Call: Includes a response to a patient(s) suffering from asphyxia, respiratory condition, convulsions, epileptic, diabetic seizure, electric shock, traumatic shock, heart attack, stroke, drug related, cuts, abrasions, fractures, burns, person fainted, nausea and pre - hospital care such as administering oxygen, CPR, defibrillation, or first aid. Other Response: Assistance to other Fire Departments, calls cancelled on route, non fire incidents where an illegal grow operation or drug operation was discovered. 11 -3 Attachment #1 to ESD- 014 -11 CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT 2011 I I 2010 THIS TODATE PERIOD $135,500 $2,334,100 11 -4 SAME TODATE PERIOD $296,200 $2,897,450 2011 2010 THIS PERIOD TO DATE SAME PER OD TO DATE TOTALS 274 2027 291 1881 FIRES /EXPLOSIONS 8 59 13 100 OUTDOOR, NO LOSS r `FIRES 8 57 8 23 NON FIRE CALLS 258 1911 270 1758 Burning (controlled) 14 60 17 65 CO False calls 13 120 16 114 False fire calls 26 193 36 182 Medical /resuscitator calls 144 1055 147 953 Other response calls 16 121 12 143 Pre fire conditions /no fire calls 7 31 3 32 Public hazard calls 5 90 11 72 Rescue calls 33 241 28 . 197 2011 I I 2010 THIS TODATE PERIOD $135,500 $2,334,100 11 -4 SAME TODATE PERIOD $296,200 $2,897,450 Attachment #1 to ESD- 014 -11 CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT 2010 2011 TODATE THIS 167 ACTIVITY 40 TODATE 13 PERIOD 71 FIRE INSPECTIONS 18 174 COMPLAINT INSPECTIONS 4 74 FIRE SAFETY PLAN 1 23 REVIEW PER PLANS REVIEW 6 64 SITE VISIT/ 24 SCHOOL VISITS 0 6 51 APPROVAL /PERMIT FIRE SAFETY HOUSE 0 ALARM FOR LIFE 0 4 PROGRAM RESIDENTIAL 280 280 VISITS PART 1 SMOKE ALARM 0 0 TICKETS ISSUED 17 SAFETY LECTURES PART 3 FIRE CODE 0 3 CHARGES FIRE EXTINGUISHER 0 FIRE INVESTIGATION 0 23 2010 SAME PERIOD TODATE 12 167 0 40 0 13 9 71 5 83 2010 totals 594 0 0 0 0 0 6 11 -5 2011 2010 ACTIVITY TH IS TODATE E TODATE PERIOD PER STATION TOURS 0 17 0 24 SCHOOL VISITS 0 8 0 12 FIRE SAFETY HOUSE 0 5 0 4 VISITS PUBLIC EVENTS 6 22 7 17 SAFETY LECTURES 0 19 0 14 FIRE EXTINGUISHER 0 4 0 2 TRAINING FIRE TRUCK VISITS 0 3 0 4 11 -5 Attachment #2 to ESD -014 -11 CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT PERIOD: August 1, 201100:00:00hrs - August 31, 2011 23:59:59hrs DESCRIPTION OF CAL't TYPES 5 ` Fire and Explosions: Instance or destructive and uncontrolled burning involving structures, vehicles and open area fires, including explosion of combustible solids, liquids or gasses which may or may not have resulted in a dollar loss or an explosion or rupture as a result of pressure, no fire Outdoor, No Loss Fires: Uncontrolled fires, outdoors, that did not result in a loss, injury or fatality and is not suspected to be caused by arson, vandalism or children playing Pre Fire Conditions: Incidents with no fire that involve heat or potential pre fire conditions e.g. pot on stove, cooking - smoke or steam, lightening, fireworks Burning (controlled): Complaint call related to outdoor controlled burning, authorized or unauthorized. Fire Department did not take suppression action. False Fire Call: Alarm activation or fire call that when investigated, is determined to be as a result of equipment failure, malicious /prank, perceived emergency, accidental activation of alarm by a person CO (carbon monoxide) False Call: a call where it is determined that the detection equipment malfunctioned or there was a perceived emergency - no CO leak Public Hazard Call: Includes a response for spills and leaks of a hazardous product such as natural gas, propane, refrigerant, miscellaneous /unknown, gasoline or fuel, toxic chemical, radio - active material, power lines down or arcing, bomb, explosive removal standby, CO (carbon monoxide) or other public hazard. Rescue Call: a call for a person in danger due to their proximity to the occurrence and who is unable to self evacuate and is assisted by Fire Department personnel i.e. vehicle accident, building collapse, commercial /industrial accident, home /residential accident, persons trapped in elevator, water rescue or water /ice rescue. Medical /Resuscitator Call: Includes a response to a patient(s) suffering from asphyxia, respiratory condition, convulsions, epileptic, diabetic seizure, electric shock, traumatic shock, heart attack, stroke, drug related, cuts, abrasions, fractures, burns, person fainted, nausea and pre - hospital care such as administering oxygen, CPR, defibrillation, or first aid. Other Response: Assistance to other Fire Departments, calls cancelled on route, non fire incidents where an illegal grow operation or drug operation was discovered. 11 -6 } Y } STATION RESPONSE SUMMARY - STATION 1 STATION 2 STATION 3 STATION STATION 5 THIS Bowmanville Newcastle Orono 4 Courtice Enniskillen MONTH THIS 151 30 18 72 12 283 MONTH TO DATE 1228 251 149 579 103 2310 DESCRIPTION OF CAL't TYPES 5 ` Fire and Explosions: Instance or destructive and uncontrolled burning involving structures, vehicles and open area fires, including explosion of combustible solids, liquids or gasses which may or may not have resulted in a dollar loss or an explosion or rupture as a result of pressure, no fire Outdoor, No Loss Fires: Uncontrolled fires, outdoors, that did not result in a loss, injury or fatality and is not suspected to be caused by arson, vandalism or children playing Pre Fire Conditions: Incidents with no fire that involve heat or potential pre fire conditions e.g. pot on stove, cooking - smoke or steam, lightening, fireworks Burning (controlled): Complaint call related to outdoor controlled burning, authorized or unauthorized. Fire Department did not take suppression action. False Fire Call: Alarm activation or fire call that when investigated, is determined to be as a result of equipment failure, malicious /prank, perceived emergency, accidental activation of alarm by a person CO (carbon monoxide) False Call: a call where it is determined that the detection equipment malfunctioned or there was a perceived emergency - no CO leak Public Hazard Call: Includes a response for spills and leaks of a hazardous product such as natural gas, propane, refrigerant, miscellaneous /unknown, gasoline or fuel, toxic chemical, radio - active material, power lines down or arcing, bomb, explosive removal standby, CO (carbon monoxide) or other public hazard. Rescue Call: a call for a person in danger due to their proximity to the occurrence and who is unable to self evacuate and is assisted by Fire Department personnel i.e. vehicle accident, building collapse, commercial /industrial accident, home /residential accident, persons trapped in elevator, water rescue or water /ice rescue. Medical /Resuscitator Call: Includes a response to a patient(s) suffering from asphyxia, respiratory condition, convulsions, epileptic, diabetic seizure, electric shock, traumatic shock, heart attack, stroke, drug related, cuts, abrasions, fractures, burns, person fainted, nausea and pre - hospital care such as administering oxygen, CPR, defibrillation, or first aid. Other Response: Assistance to other Fire Departments, calls cancelled on route, non fire incidents where an illegal grow operation or drug operation was discovered. 11 -6 Attachment #2 to ESD- 014 -11 CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT 2011 THIS TODATE PERIOD $954,751 $3,288,851 2010 SAME PERIOD 2011 THIS PERIOD TO DATE TOTALS 283 2310 FIRES _ 4 9 68 OUTDOOR; NO LOSS FIRES 3 60 NON FIRE CALLS 271 2182 Burning (controlled) 7 67 CO False calls 15 135 False fire calls 25 218 Medical /resuscitator calls 149 1204 Other response calls 24 145 Pre fire conditions /no fire calls 6 37 Public hazard calls 9 99 Rescue calls 36 277 2011 THIS TODATE PERIOD $954,751 $3,288,851 2010 SAME PERIOD TO DATE 277 2158 8 108 7 30 262 2020 13 34 25 139 18 200 138 1091 18 161 5 37 11 83 34 231 2010 SAME TODATE PERIOD $146,300 $3,043,750 11 -7 Attachment #2 to ESD-014-11 CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT ENFORCEMENTSUMMARY 2011 2010 THIS TODATE ACTIVITY 171 TODATE 46 PERIOD 13 FIRE INSPECTIONS 25 199 COMPLAINT INSPECTIONS 8 82 FIRE SAFETY PLAN 0 0 0 4 27 REVIEW PER D PLANS REVIEW 5 69 SITE VISIT/ 0 24 SCHOOL VISITS 10 61 APPROVAL/PERMIT 12 FIRE SAFETY HOUSE ALARM FOR LIFE PROGRAM RESIDENTIAL 173 453 VISITS 0 PART 1 SMOKE ALARM VISITS 0 0 TICKETS ISSUED PUBLIC EVENTS 4 PART 3 FIRE CODE 6 23 SAFETY LECTURES 0 3 CHARGES 14 FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIRE INVESTIGATION 3 26 2010 SAME PERIOD TODATE 4 171 6 46 0 13 5 76 6 89 2010 totals 594 0 0 0 0 0 6 S "t r PUBLIC EDUCATION SUMMARY 7 -'P �' '�r t '- 2011 2010 THIS ACTIVITY TODATE E TODATE PERIOD PER D STATION TOURS 0 17 0 24 SCHOOL VISITS 0 8 0 12 FIRE SAFETY HOUSE 2 7 0 4 VISITS PUBLIC EVENTS 4 26 6 23 SAFETY LECTURES 6 25 0 14 FIRE EXTINGUISHER 2 6 0 2 TRAINING FIRE TRUCK VISITS 0 3 0 4 d1w.8 Attachment #3 to ESD- 014 -11 CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT REPORT PERIOD: September 1, 201100:00:00hrs - September 30, 201123:59:59hrs DESCRIPTION OF CALL TYPES _ Ru- Fire and Explosions: Instance or destructive and uncontrolled burning involving structures, vehicles and open area fires, including explosion of combustible solids, liquids or gasses which may or may not have resulted in a dollar loss or an explosion or rupture as a result of pressure, no fire Outdoor, No Loss Fires: Uncontrolled fires, outdoors, that did not result in a loss, injury or fatality and is not suspected to be caused by arson, vandalism or children playing Pre Fire Conditions: Incidents with no fire that involve heat or potential pre fire conditions e.g. pot on stove, cooking - smoke or steam, lightening, fireworks Burning (controlled): Complaint call related to outdoor controlled burning, authorized or unauthorized. Fire Department did not take suppression action. False Fire Call: Alarm activation or fire call that when investigated, is determined to be as a result of equipment failure, malicious /prank, perceived emergency, accidental activation of alarm by a person CO (carbon monoxide) False Call: a call where it is determined that the detection equipment malfunctioned or there was a perceived emergency - no CO leak Public Hazard Call: Includes a response for spills and leaks of a hazardous product such as natural gas, propane, refrigerant, miscellaneous /unknown, gasoline or fuel, toxic chemical, radio - active material, power lines down or arcing, bomb, explosive removal standby, CO (carbon monoxide) or other public hazard. Rescue Call: a call for a person in danger due to their proximity to the occurrence and who is unable to self evacuate and is assisted by Fire Department personnel i.e. vehicle accident, building collapse, commercial /industrial accident, home /residential accident, persons trapped in elevator, water rescue or water /ice rescue. Medical /Resuscitator Call: Includes a response to a patient(s) suffering from asphyxia, respiratory condition, convulsions, epileptic, diabetic seizure, electric shock, traumatic shock, heart attack, stroke, drug related, cuts, abrasions, fractures, burns, person fainted, nausea and pre - hospital care such as administering oxygen, CPR, defibrillation, or first aid. Other Response: Assistance to other Fire Departments, calls cancelled on route, non fire incidents where an illegal grow operation or drug operation was discovered. 11 -9 STATION 1 Bowmanville STATION 2 Newcastle STATION 3 Orono STATION 4 Courtice STATION 5 Enniskillen THIS MONTH THIS 151 20 23 90 13 297 MONTH TO DATE 1379 271 172 669 116 2607 DESCRIPTION OF CALL TYPES _ Ru- Fire and Explosions: Instance or destructive and uncontrolled burning involving structures, vehicles and open area fires, including explosion of combustible solids, liquids or gasses which may or may not have resulted in a dollar loss or an explosion or rupture as a result of pressure, no fire Outdoor, No Loss Fires: Uncontrolled fires, outdoors, that did not result in a loss, injury or fatality and is not suspected to be caused by arson, vandalism or children playing Pre Fire Conditions: Incidents with no fire that involve heat or potential pre fire conditions e.g. pot on stove, cooking - smoke or steam, lightening, fireworks Burning (controlled): Complaint call related to outdoor controlled burning, authorized or unauthorized. Fire Department did not take suppression action. False Fire Call: Alarm activation or fire call that when investigated, is determined to be as a result of equipment failure, malicious /prank, perceived emergency, accidental activation of alarm by a person CO (carbon monoxide) False Call: a call where it is determined that the detection equipment malfunctioned or there was a perceived emergency - no CO leak Public Hazard Call: Includes a response for spills and leaks of a hazardous product such as natural gas, propane, refrigerant, miscellaneous /unknown, gasoline or fuel, toxic chemical, radio - active material, power lines down or arcing, bomb, explosive removal standby, CO (carbon monoxide) or other public hazard. Rescue Call: a call for a person in danger due to their proximity to the occurrence and who is unable to self evacuate and is assisted by Fire Department personnel i.e. vehicle accident, building collapse, commercial /industrial accident, home /residential accident, persons trapped in elevator, water rescue or water /ice rescue. Medical /Resuscitator Call: Includes a response to a patient(s) suffering from asphyxia, respiratory condition, convulsions, epileptic, diabetic seizure, electric shock, traumatic shock, heart attack, stroke, drug related, cuts, abrasions, fractures, burns, person fainted, nausea and pre - hospital care such as administering oxygen, CPR, defibrillation, or first aid. Other Response: Assistance to other Fire Departments, calls cancelled on route, non fire incidents where an illegal grow operation or drug operation was discovered. 11 -9 Attachment #3 to ESD- 014-11 CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT �_ _ CAL'LTYFESUMMARY - - - - 2011 2011 2010 PERIOD TH IS PERIOD TO DATE SAM E PER OD TO DATE TOTALS 297 2607 254 2412 `-FIRES 6 74 10 118 OUTDOOR, NO LOSS FIRES 1 61 2 32 NON FIRE CALLS 290 2472 242 2262 Burning (controlled) 7 74 11 89 CO False calls 11 146 17 156 False fire calls 33 251 21 221 Medical /resuscitator calls 161 1365 151 1242 Other response calls 26 171 14 175 Pre fire conditions /no fire calls 7 44 2 39 Public hazard calls 3 102 4 87 Rescue calls 42 319 22 253 2011 THIS TODATE PERIOD $14,000 $5,636,951 11 -10 2010 SAME TODATE PERIOD $661,160 $6,602,360 Attachment #3 to ESD- 014 -11 CLARINGTON EMERGENCY & FIRE SERVICES ACTIVITY REPORT 2010 2011 TODATE THIS 365 ACTIVITY 112 TODATE 29 PERIOD 163 FIRE INSPECTIONS 21 394 COMPLAINT INSPECTIONS 15 171 FIRE SAFETY PLAN 0 3 15 8 58 REVIEW PLANS REVIEW 12 145 SITE VISIT/ 6 56 FIRE EXTINGUISHER 7 119 APPROVAL /PERMIT 0 10 ALARM FOR LIFE PROGRAM RESIDENTIAL 0 453 VISITS PART 1 SMOKE ALARM 0 0 TICKETS ISSUED PART 3 FIRE CODE 0 6 CHARGES FIRE INVESTIGATION 0 49 2010 2011 TODATE THIS 365 ACTIVITY 112 TODATE 29 PERIOD 163 STATION TOURS 1 36 SCHOOL VISITS 1 18 FIRE SAFETY HOUSE 0 3 15 1 14 VISITS PUBLIC EVENTS 10 68 SAFETY LECTURES 6 56 FIRE EXTINGUISHER 0 10 TRAINING FIRE TRUCK VISITS 0 6 2010 SAME PERIOD TODATE 27 365 26 112 3 29 16 163 38 210 2010 totals 594 1 1 0 0 3 15 2010 SAME PERIOD TODATE 11 70 5 34 0 8 10 60 7 42 2 8 0 8 11 -11 Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: October 17, 2011 Resolution #: By -law #: Report#: CLD- 028 -11 File #: Subject: ANIMAL SERVICES QUARTERLY REPORT — JULY — SEPTEMBER, 2011 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CLD- 028 -11 be received; and 2. THAT a copy of report CLD- 028 -11 be forwarded to the Animal Alliance of Canada. Submitted by: ' /// . 9.. ! Reviewed by: j' Pa{ti L. Barrie / Municipal Clerk PLB /CAG r Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 13 -1 REPORT NO.: CLD- 028 -11 1. BACKGROUND PAGE 2 Animal Services activities are report to Council on a quarterly basis. The attachment to this report summarizes the activities and revenues pertaining to Animal Services for the months July to September, 2011, as recorded by staff as at the time this report was prepared. 2. COMMENTS Over the past six months we have experienced an unusually high degree of staff absenteeism due to medical issues and as such, we have been required to reduce our hours of operation. Operating at a skeletal staff compliment over this time period is reflected in our 3rd quarter statistics as a reduction in service level standards over the same quarter in 2010. We remain hopeful that we will return to a full complement late in the 4t" quarter, and thus return to our standard service levels. 3. CONCURRENCE - Not applicable. 4. CONCLUSION Animal Services continues to strive to maintain service levels for the residents of Clarington. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Anne Greentree, Deputy Clerk Attachments: Attachment 1: Quarterly & Year -To -Date Statistics Interested Parties: Ms. Liz White, Animal Alliance of Canada 13 -2 Attachment 1 3rd Quarter & YTD Statistics 2011 Dispatch Summary Issue Types Animal Control Issues I r �'�' s: ,r•'t�,�.� `°"� � ��,..��'a Ambulance Request Animal Control Animal Not Found CruOy Complaint Animal Picked �_■ ' General .. Returned To Owner Routine Inspectio Charge .. Issued Warning •• .� Animal Control Issues 13 -3 Animal Not Found Animal Picked .� Returned To Owner Charge .. Issued Warning •• .� Grand .. 13 -3 Attachment 1 3rd Quarter & YTD Statistics 2011 Total By G/L Code (start here) Impound/Surrender d /Sur 0705 -6400 - Animal Service Impound /Surrender Fee I 26 I 1305.00 I 33 ( 1570.00 78 I 3955 ( 98 ( 4975.00 100 -19- 190 -30715 -6401 -Animal Trap Rentals 1 9.52 1 9.52 6 104.72 2 19.04 100 -00- 000 - 00000 -6506 -Cash Over /Short 0 Account 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 -98.02 100 -21- 000 - 00000 -6506 - Finance Charges 0 0 0 0 1 25.00 0 0 after NSF 100 -19- 130 - 30641 -6400 - Licences Paid after 0 0 0 ______F 0 0 `T 0 T-o 0 NSF _ 100 -19- 190 - 00000 -7162 - Vet Services - Repayment for Expenses 1 73.11 1 106.90 ^ 1 - -�- -- -1 73.11 -(- 3 374.53 100-19- 190 - 00000 - 7250 - Commission Expenses (ANTCO) 7 384.00 0 �� 0 18 ���_[ 838.00 I� 0 0 0 - 100_19_190- 30720 -6400 - Disposal of Animals 4 233.00 5 352.50 8 681.00 18 1094.65 100 -19 -190- 35525 -6500 ,Dog /Cat Licences 188 9515.00 1373 30739.00 2704 64055.50 4571 103084.00 523 -00- 000 - 00000 -6760 - Donations 12 755.00 10 2055.00 1 40 1 2383.64' 25 1 3295.00 100 -00- 000 - 02033 -2003 - GST 0 0 2 7.75 0 -( - -0 -i 100 468.53 100 -19- 130 - 35520 -6500 - Other Licences - Kennel 1 100.00 0 0 12 1300.00 0 0 100 -00- 000 - 02034 -2003 PST 0 0 2 10.40 0 98 739.77 100 -19 -190- 30710 -6400 - Sale of Animals 22 2484.96 67 5863.25 99 9655.07 154 14513.50 100 -00- 000- 02035 - 2003 -HST 27 376.57 68 821.84 113 1432.10 68 821.84 100 - 19190- 00000 - 7180 - Animal Services - Spay /Neuter Rebate 0 0 0 0 ( 0 I o 1 50.00 Totals 289 15256.16 1562 41536.16 3080 84503.14 5141 129337.84 13 -4 Attachment 1 3rd Quarter & YTD Statistics 2011 Shelter Statistics - Outgoing by Animal Type Adopted 1 - 0' 31 1 1 11 38' 26 _... Adopted Altered -; 1 -. 0 9 , 0 0 ! 10 ,Adopted Offsite � � �. � �. �.. � Adopted Offs ite(Alte red) � _((, 0_ -,._ � � � _ 3 � , .__. 24 2� Adopted Offsite Unaltered 0 0 01 4 0 i 0 4 11 61, 16 Adopted Unaltered F 4 0 1._.__ _._. 0 -_1_ 7 ? 01 0 01 0 1 11 34 : 32 53 Bite Quarantine (Home) O . O_ 0.. ..___._0 r 0 _ -_ 0 O _ 0 0 1 DOA 0 0, 6 1 0 1 8 j 12 24 40 DOA - Final Disposition P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 2 3 - RTO � 0 _0 0 1 0 1 0 Euthan zed 0 0 ? 1 , O, 0 3, 9. 7; 21 Euthanized by Offsite Vet 1 0 1 21 3` 0 0 6 6 j 12 " 0 0 0 , 0 I 0 0 0 0 _ Reclaimed Reclaimed i 41 -_— - 1 � 4 -__ -0 6 j _ -0 -- �..,.. -.. 46 � 39 ' - 125 128 Redemption ( Offsite) .0 0 0 0 O t 0 O 0 0 1 01 0 Released 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 j 1 2 3 2 Released to Owner at V et 1 , i Stolen oI o ; _O f ...0 '.. o o o 0_L. _ o Transfer Out 0 0�._ _- __- - -4 _ 0 13 ' S 24 19 Unassisted Death 0 1 0 1 - 0 1 0 2` 7 2 j 9' Unassisted In Foster 00_� 0 0. Wildlife ReleDased .._.._.__� �.� -.. __ -- �..._ _._.. �.! _ _�.: Other_... 3.� 33_�__ 0 ..3 .__3 0_.. 0 - - - -. 3.�. 3. Total I 53 ! 1 ° d 35 22 1 I 1 � 113 151 313 � 401 ., 13 -5 Attachment 1 3rd Quarter & YTD Statistics 2011 Shelter Statistics - Identification Comparison t �{ j ° L?1xd�Gi�f%�S^,�k',' �{�T; �. t z� ✓e' iit t- iE: #�'ij�dA fi,` `� �''& T f i t,rsyyr .t i 3 S I 33 yy j t, S g F`'5 [' Number of 1 28 51 20 0 1 0 101 m Animals Cat 1 26 27 0 37 37 76 108 Dog 14 37 51 11 32 43 129 152 Kitten 0 32 32 0 32 32 67 110 Puppy 0 1 1 0 13 13 7 19 Bird 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Rabbit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Mammal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Length of Stay 13 -6 i yyF gg L Number of 1 28 51 20 0 1 0 101 m Animals C Number of Days 0 4631 429 1002 0 0 0 6062 M N Average 0 165 8 50 0 0 0 -- Number of 0 31 48 34 0 14 0 127 Animals t Number of Days 0 2426 560 2619 0 398 0 6003 a c i CY Average 0 78 11 77 0 28 0 -- Number of 1 100 127 46 0 6 0 280 Animals N Number of 0 12122 804 2388 0 21 0 15,335 Days E- Average 0 121 6 51 0 3 0 -- Number of 0 108 160 59 0 17 1 345 o Animals N Number of 0 8525 1327 4025 0 405 31 14313 0 Days Average 0 78 1 8 1 68 0 23 31 -- 13 -6 Attachment 1 3rd Quarter & YTD Statistics 2011 Shelter Statistics - Incoming (including transfers) 3rd Quarter 2011 Dog 25 01 0 1 Puppy 0 0 0 Cat 5. 6 � 01 Kitten , 1 1 1 01 Bird 0 r 0 0 } Mammal' 0 0 11 Total 31 7 1 -1- - YTD 2011 2` 0 i... _..... 2 0 01 41 W 25E 0 0 52! i 6 j 0 58 + 0 0 C .._2-0, O 31 01 3 .3 91 221 0 0' 2; 331 0 1 01 01 18 1 I 0 l_... 1._..._ ; 0 I 0 91 __0 69 0 Oi 3 121! Dog i 70 1 1 i 1 0 0 6 j 0 58 + 0 0 136 Puppy ti 31 01 0 01 01 1 j 2� 2; 0{ 0 8i Cat 11 18 1 I 0 0+ 12 0 64 ' 0 0 ! 106 Kitten 1 3 0 0{ 1! 7' 15 51 01 0 78 Bird. 0 0 0: 01 0 0 0' 1; 0� 0 1 Mammal 0 0; 0 1; Of 0 0` 0; 0!: 0 1' Total 85 22 21 1 1 I 26 17 176 0 0! 330 3rd Quarter 2010 a{ Ow y��Q l!$3as�a� Dog 23 r 1 1 2 0 Puppy 1 1 01 0 �9 Cat 9 ! 8 ( 1 0 Kitten i 0 1 0 j 8 Bird 0 1 0 0 Mammal ' 0 ! 1 0 ! 0 Total 33 12 . 3 i 17 _..._— 19 i __, _ 0 1 — - — 0 — - -- 45 3 01 0, 13' 251 0+ 01 43 li 22 1 01 01 31 01 01 01 11 0 0 69 ! 0 ! .0. .._134 13 -7 Attachment 1 3rd Quarter & YTD Statistics 2011 YTD 2010 Dog 791 2 Puppy I 4 0 Cat 20 g 28 Kitten 0 3 Bird wildlife 0 1 Mammal 0 i 4 Rabbit 0 0 Total 103 1 38 0 0 0? 0 O) 0 _ 5 181 41 Animal Bite /Attack & OTR Summary 31 0 0 1601 I 71 01 0! 26, 0 O i 0 44, 0! 0; 0 115, 0 0 0; 1,' _.._. _ i 01 0 0', 4 0! 0 1_ 10 .Oi 0! 0i 451; Detail 3rd Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 2011 YTD 2010 YTD 2011 Dog Bites Reported 3 7 10 11 Dog Attacks Reported 6 7 22 18 OTRs Issued 4 5 18 14 13--8 ry 1:4 4 ;L61 Z-44 Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: October 17, 2011 Resolution #: By -law #: N/A Report#: COD - 031 -11 File #: Subiect: CL2011 -28, BOWMANVILLE VALLEY PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE & TRAIL RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: THAT Report COD - 031 -11 be received; 2. THAT Taylor Wakefield General Contractors Limited, Toronto, Ontario, with a total bid in the amount of $212,090.17 (net of H.S.T. Rebate), being the lowest responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2011 -28, be awarded the contract for the Bowmanville Valley Pedestrian Bridge and Trail, as required by the Engineering Department; 3. THAT the funds required in the amount of $ 263,539, which includes $212,090.17 for tendering plus contingency amount, engineering and materials testing and the Municipality's Net HST amount) be drawn from the following Engineering Department Capital Budget Accounts: 2011 - Bowmanville Valley Bridge & Trail 110 -32- 325 - 83257 -7401 .................................... ............................... $ 238,000.00 2011 — Nelson Parkette (unexpended funds) 110 -32- 325 - 83340 -7401 ........................................ ............................... $25,539.00 $263,539.00 14 -1 REPORT NO.: COD - 031 -11 PAGE 2 4. THAT the Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary agreement. Submitted by: Reviewed by: rie Marano, H.B.Sc., C.M.O., Franklin Wu, Direc r of Corporate Services Chief Administrative Officer ancy T y& r, B , /C.A., Director of Finance/Treasurer MM /JDB /km 14 -2 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 REPORT NO.: COD - 031 -11 BACKGROUND PAGE 3 1.1 Tender specifications were provided by the AECOM for the Bowmanville Valley Pedestrian Bridge and Trail. 1.2 Tender CL2011 -28 - Bowmanville Valley Pedestrian Bridge and Trail was advertised in the Daily Commercial News and electronically on the Municipality's website and the Ontario Public Buyer's Association website. Subsequently, tenders were received, reviewed and tabulated as per the memo from the Engineering Department (Attachment 1). 1.3 ' Attached for information is a copy of the Key Maps (Attachment 2) indicating locations of the project. 2.0 ANALYSIS 2.1 A total of twelve (12) submissions were received in response to the tender call. All submissions were deemed compliant. 2.2 Based on the bids submitted, the project cost is in excess of the budget amount. In order to bring the cost to within an acceptable limit and allow for a contingency a portion of the trail has been deleted from the schedule of work. This change was applied consistently to the three low bids submitted, and the bid submitted by Taylor Wakefield Contractors Limited remains the low compliant bid. 2.3 After further review and analysis of the compliant bids by AECOM, the Engineering Department and Purchasing, it was mutually agreed that the low bidder, Taylor Wakefield General Contractors Limited, Toronto, Ontario be recommended for the contract for the Bowmanville Valley Pedestrian Bridge and Trail. A copy of the recommendation memo from the Department of Engineering is appended as Attachment 1. 2.4 Taylor Wakefield Contractors Limited has not provided similar services to.the Municipality of Clarington in the past although they were recently awarded a project for parkette construction. A review of their references, Oakville, Ajax and Georgina indicate that the level of service has been satisfactory. 2.5 Queries with respect to the department needs, specifications, etc. should be referred to the Director of Engineering. 3.0 FINANCIAL 3.1 The total project cost is $ 263,539.00 (i.e., which includes $212,090.17 for tendering, engineering, administration and a ten percent contingency amount and materials testing and the Municipality's net HST). 14 -3 REPORT NO.: COD - 031 -11 PAGE 4 3.2 The total revised project costs for the Bowmanville Valley Pedestrian Bridge and Trail project exceed the budgeted amount. The additional funds in the amount of $25,539.00 are available as unexpended funds in the Nelson Street Parkette project account 10 -32- 325 - 83340 -7401. 4.0 COMMENT 4.1 Public tenders were invited resulting in the submission of complaint bids with the low- revised bid being acceptable. Therefore it is recommended that the contract be awarded to the low compliant bidder, Taylor Wakefield General Contractors Limited, Toronto. 5.0 CONCURRENCE 5.1 This report has been reviewed by A.S. Cannella, Director of Engineering Services, who concurs with the recommendations. 5.2 Queries with respect department needs, specifications, etc., should be referred to the Director of Engineering. 6.0 CONCLUSION 6.1 To award the contract to Taylor Wakefield General Contractors Limited, Toronto, Ontario for Contract CL2011 -28 Bowmanville Valley Pedestrian Bridge and Trail. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN —Not Applicable Staff Contact: Jerry D. Barber, C.P.P.O., Purchasing Manager Attachments: Attachment 1 - Memo from Engineering Services Attachment 2 - Key Maps List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Not.Applicable 14 -4 ATTACHMENT 1 TO: Jerry'Barber, Purchasing Manager FROM: Peter Windolf, Park Development Manager DATE: October 14, 2011 SUBJECT: Bowmanville Valley Bridge and Trail Construction Tender CL2011 -28 The Engineering Services Department has reviewed the low bid by Taylor Wakefield General Contractors Limited and offers the following comments: In 2011 Council approved $238,000 for the construction of Bowmanville Valley Bridge and Trail. We recommend award of the contract in the amount of $212,090 (net of H.S.T. rebate) for the project. Taylor Wakefield was recently awarded the contract for the construction of Nelson Street Parkette. Their references were checked as part of that award and I am satisfied they will be able to complete this project to our satisfaction. In order for the project to be awarded some items have been deleted from the contract. Those items include trail construction on the west side of the bridge and the asphalt surface for the trail on the east side. Those items will be included in our Capital Budget submission for 2012. A contingency allowance of 10% 'is carried forward. The Engineering Services Department advises the following breakdown for the above referenced project: 14 -5 Project Breakdown Total Project Costs: Construction $ 212,090 Engineering $ 30,240 Contingency $ 21,209 Total Project Cost $ 263,539 Project Funding: 2011 Budget — Bowmanville Valley Bridge &Trail 110 -32- 325 - 83257 -7401 $238,000 2011 Budget — Unexpended funds for Nelson Parkette 110 -32- 325 - 83340 -7401 $25,539 Estimated Budget Surplus /(Deficit) $ 0 14 -5 Bowmanville Valley Bridge and Trail CL2011 -23 2 Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Regards, Peter Windolf, GALA, CSLA Manager Park Development Attachment Cc . Nancy Taylor, Director of Finance Tony Cannella, Director of Engineering ATTACHMENT 1 CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T(905)623 -3379 ow ATTACHMENT 2 y SPRY AVE 4 3 t ti d __j Baseline Rd, W SITE H4lY, AAI Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: October 17, 2011 Resolution #: By -law #: Report#: FND- 022 -11 File #: Subiect: ACCOUNT SET -UP MANULIFE BANK OF CANADA RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report FND- 022 -11 be received; and 2. That the Chief Administrative Officer, Treasurer and Deputy Treasurer be the authorized signatories on the account with Manulife Bank of Canada and that a combination of two of the signatories may be authorized to sign agreements and other documents and deliver such instructions to the bank. Submitted by: Reviewed by Nancy T ylor, A, CA. Director of Finance/ Treasurer NT /CC /hjl Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 15 -1 REPORT NO.: FND- 022 -11 1. BACKGROUND PAGE 2 1.1 The Municipality has a sound and solid investment policy as documented in Report FND- 017 -02 which was approved by Council Resolution C- 622 -02. This policy specifically limits the Municipality's investment options to debt issued by Federal, Provincial or Municipal governments and Schedule I or II banks (previously referred to as Schedule A or B). 1.2 Section 418(1) of the Ontario Municipal Act R.S.O. 2001 provides the legislative authority to invest monies not immediately required for current operating purposes. Section 418(6) specifically states that only securities outlined in the Act can be invested in and proceeds to list all of the eligible investment vehicles. Ontario Regulation 438/97 Eligible Investments and Related Financial Agreements further defines the qualified investments for a municipality. 1.3 The Municipality of Clarington has maintained a conservative investment policy. The investment objectives of the Municipality are: ✓ Adherence to statutory requirements ✓ Preservation of capital ✓ Diversification of investment portfolio ✓ Maintenance of liquidity to ensure funds available as required ✓ Maximize rate of return of investments while meeting the above objectives 1.4 The Municipality regularly monitors the investments and checks the market for the suitable investments. The Municipality was contacted by Don Hutton of Don Hutton Insurance, who is an authorized representative of the Manulife Bank of Canada. Manulife Bank has offered favorable rates through Don Hutton Insurance. Manulife Bank is a Schedule I bank with solid ratings shown in the table below. As per the Municipality's investment policy, investment with Manulife Bank would be limited to a maximum of 30% of the portfolio the same as all other Schedule I banks. 1.5 The Municipality has pursued an initial investment in accordance with the prevailing investment policy. 2. CONCURRENCE: Not applicable 15 -2 Standard & Poor's DBRS Short -term rating A -1 R -1 middle Long-term rating A+ A (high) 1.5 The Municipality has pursued an initial investment in accordance with the prevailing investment policy. 2. CONCURRENCE: Not applicable 15 -2 REPORT NO.: FND -022 -11 PAGE 3 3. CONCLUSION 3.1 In order to comply with banking procedures, a resolution is required to authorize the Chief Administrative Officer, Treasurer and Deputy Treasurer to be the authorized signatories for the account of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington with Manulife Bank. The account is structured such that a combination of two of the signatories is authorized on behalf of the Corporation to sign agreements and other documents and deliver such instructions as may be required by the bank. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN — Not Applicable Staff Contact: Nancy Taylor, Director of Finance/Treasurer 15 -3 Clarftwil CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE Meeting: GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Date: October 17, 2011 Resolution #: By -law#: Report#: CAO- 009 -11 File #: Subject: CLARINGTON BOARD OF TRADE CONTRACT RENEWAL RECOMMENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report CAO- 009 -11 be received; 2. THAT Council approve the renewal of the current contract with the Clarington board of Trade for the delivery of economic development services for a period of five years (2012 -2016 inclusive) for an annual fee of $225,000 with a 2.5% annual cost of living adjustment; 3. THAT the Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement with the Board of Trade; 4. THAT all interested parties listed in Report CAO- 009 -11 be advised of Council's decision. Submitted by: FW /jp M1 C- Franklin Wu, M.A.O.M Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905 - 623 -3379 17 -1 REPORT NO.: CAO- 009 -11 1. 1.1 1.2 1.3 4 2.1 17 -2 PAGE 2 BACKGROUND The Clarington Board of Trade was incorporated in 1998 as a result of following through with a key recommendation of the Mayor's Task Force on Economic Development. The key mandate of the Board is to deliver economic development service on behalf of the Municipality, and specifically, in the area of business attraction and business retention. In exchange for the service rendered, the Municipality entered into a contractual agreement with the Board to provide an annual fee to offset its operating cost. The fees were adjusted over the years and shown as follows: 2000 $75,000. 2001 $75,000. 2002 $75,000. 2003 $75,000. 2004 $90,000. 2005 $95,000. 2006 $100,000. 2007 $100,000. 2008 $103,000. 2009 $106,000. 2010 $110,000. 2011 $110,000. The current contract expires on December 31, 2011 and would require a decision of Council to continue the contractual arrangement and to determine the costs to continue the said services. The Board met with the Chief Administrative Officer, presented its Business Plan which contains a request for a five (5) year contract renewal to reflect the following fee structure: 2012 $225,000. 2013 $230,625. 2014 $256,391. 2015 $262,800. 2016 $269,370. COMMENTS Since assuming the responsibility of economic development in 1999, the Board of Trade has gradually evolved into an umbrella organization of all local business REPORT NO.: CAO- 009 -11 PAGE 3 groups and associations. Working in concert with those economic development partners, the Board has taken on many economic development and promotional activities, spoken on behalf of all businesses in Clarington and worked closely with municipal staff to facilitate new business development. In addition, the Board has also established a strong presence within the Greater Toronto Area economic development community. 2.2 From a performance perspective, the Chief Administrative Officer has the privilege of working closely with the Board staff and is of the opinion that the Board has more than lived up to the terms'and conditions of the Economic Development Contract. The Board staff has communicated well with municipal staff and has reported regularly to Council on its work program and accomplishment. 2.3 Our current model of economic development service being delivered by the Board is very cost effective. The Municipality is getting excellent value for the economic development services for a relatively small amount of fund allocated for this very important municipal function. Compared to similar size municipalities, Clarington's contribution to economic development services is among the lowest, if not the lowest. While the Municipality is getting excellent value for the work performed by the Board, the current underfunding will hamper future economic development efforts. 2.4 A lot has changed since the Board of Trade was incorporated thirteen years ago. Specifically, the Municipality has grown and there are increasing economic development activities witnessing the several impending major projects such as OPG Refurbishment, New Build, 407 and all the energy related business opportunities. All these require the necessary staff resources to ensure that the Municipality can capture all the potential business opportunities as well as to 17 -3 REPORT NO.: CAO- 009 -11 PAGE 4 accelerate our effort. The Board staff has done a very good job in doing whatever is necessary but it has become quite clear within the last few years that the current staff resources would not be enough for the Board to carry out its contractual requirement of attracting new business and retaining existing business. 2.5 The Municipality's Strategy Plan has identified Economic Development as one of the six (6) priorities for this term of Council. Supporting the Board's request is not only consistent with this priority, but is critically important for the Municipality to work towards the long term goal of reducing our residential tax burden. 3. CONCLUSION The request from the board is very modest and is well supported by its Business Plan. Our model of economic development services through the Board of Trade has not only proven that it works, it is also the most cost effective for the delivery of this important service and therefore should be preserved and enhanced. In consideration of all the comments previously stated in this report, the Chief Administrative Officer would recommend Committee and Council approve the recommendations contained herein. CONFORMITY WITH STRATEGIC PLAN The recommendations contained in this report conform to the general intent of the following priorities of the Strategic Plan: X Promoting economic development Maintaining financial stability Connecting Clarington Promoting green initiatives Investing in infrastructure Showcasing our community Not in conformity with Strategic Plan Staff Contact: Franklin Wu, Chief Administrative Officer 17 -4 REPORT NO.: CAO -009 -11 List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision: Sheila Hall, Executive Director Economic Development Officer The Clarington Board of Trade & Office of Economic Development 181 Liberty Street South, P.O. Box 434 Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3Z2 PAGE 5 17 -5 • MEMO C 111 Leading the 111ay CLERK'S DEPARTMENT To: Mayor Foster and Members of Council From: Anne Greentree, Deputy Clerk Date: October 14, 2011 Subject: GENERAL PURPOSE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA — OCTOBER 17, 2011 — UPDATE Please be advised of the following amendments to the GPA agenda for the meeting to be held on Monday, October 17, 2011: 6. DELEGATIONS See attached Final List. (Attachment#1) Ahe re tree, b eputy Clerk AGljeg cc: F. Wu, Chief Administrative Officer Department Heads CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON 40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L1C 3A6 T 905-623-3379 F 905-623-6506 Attachment #1 of Update Memo FINAL LIST OF DELEGATIONS GPA Meeting: October 17, 2011 (a) Frank Perri, AVP Construction and Rob Simpson, Project Manager, Canadian Tire Corporation, Regarding the Sustainability of the New Canadian Tire Store Opening October, 2011 HANDOUTS PRESENTATIONS jj a r � r ` 4 - r 7 77 Peer Review DNGS Refurbishment & Continued Operations EA • • - I 11 1 • Background • Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) releases draft Scoping Document for Environmental Assessment (EA) to Ontario Power Generation (OPG) • OPG completes Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Technical Supporting Documents (TSD's) • Funding made available by OPG to Municipality of Clarington as the host community to undertake a peer review of the EIS and TSD's • AECOM retained to complete peer review • Hardy Stevenson and Associates, Hemson Consulting and RWDI Group sub-contracted to AECOM • Peer review commences June 2011 DNGS Peer Review October 17, 2011 Page 2 H MSON .TE��E.�SC..... Clarington ,q`COM L� nSSOCI T Le� may Timeline ■ 2010: Baseline DNGS operations ➢ workforce at approximately 2,500 employees ■ 2014: DNGS operating with site preparation activities underway for Refurbishment and New Nuclear Development (NND) project ■ 2018: full complement of NND project construction staff and DNGS operations and refurbishment staff on site Peak workforce level doubled from baseline to approximately 5,200 employees ■ 2021 : Construction and operations staff on site for NND project (for two units) as well as DNGS operations and refurbishment staff ■ 2031 : All construction activities for both the Refurbishment and NND projects complete. Full operating staff in place workforce at approximately 2,700 employees x MSaN _ A - S Clariagton AZCOM DNGS Peer Review October 17, 2011 Page 3 ;"ND 'E� KIES �S+s1�.ASu-u �1r:� Lena.„R,,, ay Sco e • Detailed review of draft EIS and TSD's as they relate to the Municipality's core responsibilities and interests: ➢ Land Use ➢ Socio-Economic Environment ➢ Traffic and Transportation ➢ Atmospheric Environment • Tasks: ➢ Review relevant reports and studies ➢ Provide comments and review OPG's disposition of comments ➢ Sign off on final comments and dispositions ➢ Present final peer review results to Clarington Council Attend OPG Community Information Sessions, if so directed by Clarington HEMSON H tt R D Y DNGS Peer Review October 17, 2011 Page 4 S CMG E`SCSI T A►_ AS IaC111 011 COM ATF Le� may Resolution of Key Issues � 4a I i r vY u�- b t A 5 may ti Atmospheric Environment 1 . Modelling assumptions regarding new Benzene Criterion more stringent World Health Organization 1 -hour guidelines for NO2 of 200 pg/m3 2 . Emission assumptions regarding increased future traffic and decreased future vehicle emission between Existing scenario and 2013 NND No-Build scenario 3. Cumulative effects of DNGS and NND activities as well as DNGS and EFW activities x MSaN H , R D Clariagton A=Com DNGS Peer Review October 17, 2011 Page 6 WNL) TStIIS t11*JL�ASSiK:1N1'E:� Leoa„Rr„ rvay Land Use and Socio-Economic Environment 1 . Potential need for long-term on-site storage of radioactive waste 2 . Consideration of economic impacts beyond regional study area 3. Monitoring for effectiveness of measures proposed to mitigate impacts on socio-economic environment 4. Further study regarding implications surrounding Fukushima, Japan 5. Acknowledgement of increased burden on Clarington planning and engineering departments HEMSON H A R D Y DNGS Peer Review October 17, 2011 Page 7 .TEGE. SON Clarlagton ,al►_COM ,INN ASSa IAA Le� may Traffic and Transportation 1 . Strategy for mitigation of capacity issues at Waverly Road interchange 2 . Effect of anticipated "limited changes" to the Highway 407 timeline 3. Discussion/analysis of plausibility of assumptions regarding Voluntary diversion of traffic from intersections where capacity may become an issue Use of limited east-west connections to accommodate diversion 4. Potential for deterioration of road surfaces due to heavy truck traffic x MSaN O DNGS Peer Review October 17, 2011 Page 8 � S Clariagton A►=COM �1*rS}.ASI-c7C,tA1l>S Traffic and Transportation 5. Traffic delays on major routes due to train blockages 6. Anticipated timing of base improvements and potential for delay of these improvements 7. Consideration of cumulative effects regarding all major infrastructure initiatives, particularly with regard to the timing of these initiatives and associated impact on traffic and transportation in the local study area HEMSON H A R D Y DNGS Peer Review October 17, 2011 Page 9 ATE TSC71 T I aC111 011 / =Com LN -ASSOCIATES Le� may Traffic and Transportation ■ To address all noted key issues, OPG has committed to ➢ participation in a process to develop a Traffic Management Plan ➢ participating financially as appropriate in necessary transportation works/improvements in a timely manner if they are attributable to the DNGS Refurbishment Project x MSON V . S C1c71'll1gt011 =Com DNGS Peer Review October 17, 2011 Page 10 � V S0UXrB ;�I�La.�,.s�:K t�`l'E� Lena.„R,,, may Municipal Finance 1 . Expenditure impacts arising from the Project, most notably on transportation and protection services, not covered by increased revenue sources (i.e. direct new taxes, building permit fees, development charges, increased household property taxes associated with the Project and property taxes to be paid by OPG) 2 . OPG participation in the Traffic Management Plan will provide the opportunity to identify an appropriate fiscal framework for mitigation of transportation impacts HEMSON F3 A R D Y _ DNGS Peer Review October 17, 2011 Page 11 TEG.�'�TSC1�T 1�71111�°'�011 A�COM L� nS IAA Le� may Next Steps I wiff-AM,mi . _ Lin �� Ml too Next Steps Following resolution by Council 1 . Submit Report PSD-083-11 and comments prepared by peer review team to OPG 2. Advise all interested parties listed in Report PSD-083-11 and delegations 3. Establish follow-up program to ensure that the Municipality's comments and concerns are adequately addressed OPG's commitment regarding participation in theTraffic Management Plan are fulfilled to the Municipality's satisfaction OPG's commitment to participate financially in appropriate, necessary transportation works/improvements attributable to the DNGS Refurbishment Project occurs in a timely manner x MSaN S x S Clariagton A XOM DNGS Peer Review October 17, 2011 Page 13 ASKUKIN WN1�.��u-u �15:S Thank You HEMSON H A R D Y STEVENSON �L=Com AND ASSOCINI-ES Claringt n Board of Trade and Office of Economic Development Empowering Your Business Clarington Board of Trade Office of Economic Development business Plan 2011 to 2(11f am Presentation to Clarington Council - Monday, October, 7 7h, 2077 CBOT A Success Story Established in 1998 Unique delivery model Cost effective delivery model 300 members 100 ' s of volunteers Trust and respect of our business community , "A Clarinqton Board of Trade and Office of Economic Development Opportunities ahead . . . Darlington Refurbishment New Nuclear Project Port Granby Durham Highway 407 extension • Train Expansion Existing Business Retention Post Secondary ` Education Facility Life Science . • - Retail and Service Clarinqton Board • Trade I • Office of • •mic Develop Supporting and Assisting Existing Business Hosting results oriented roundtable discussions with business sectors such as developers and the industrial community Playing a unique roll in facilitating communication among stakeholders to place Clarington as a leader in the development process .. T����o,,,,,•" CLAHINGTON Ca, - ---_ �0A10 Gnro,+!-.Oppz�nvarty in omunrxd.„. CLARINGTON ?. CLARINGTON " v.oud Nomc of �� - Uorlinptan Nudcar J\I� 4 ` Canadian Nuclear Assoc. Conference Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters Conference Clarinqton Board of Trade and Office of Economic Development Supporting and Assisting Existing Business Catalyst for business networking and partnerships Special sector specific forums - such as the Energy Summit and Expanding into Global Markets Corporate Visits Touring our vacant land and building inventory Clarinqton Board of Trade and Office of Economic Development our Focus Sectors for Attraction . . . Energy - k - Life Science Agri - Business Food Processin g Transportation Clarinqton Board ctl of Trade and Office Economic Development Lean a Mean . . . 2010 2009 . 2002 2Ug/ 2005 ■ Fr Ono q 6 Developm ent . ConRac� 2005 2004 ■ M ern be S M p/Event Revenue 2003 2013/ . 700] 2UgU 1989 . O JOORO 40100 60000 ROOCO ] OOORO 128500 .. . C I a r i n t o n Board O{Trade and Office of Economic Development What It Takes t ® Get There . . . Total Annual Budget $2,000,000.00 $1,800,000.00 $1,600,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,200,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $800,000.00 $600,000.00 $400,000.00 Per Capita $200,000.00 $ $12.00 $ $10.00 - a�eet�ot Ja Q�o�t� ��tc��t �o� are L`at\� $8.00 - O�tr Qew �a�a ot��o Cta� $6.00 $4. $2.00 00 _ Per Capita - o�� 0� Cow Qa a� L Clarin ton Board of Trade and Office of Economic Development success story Most cost efficient model Strength of volunteers Existing business community investment Strong partnerships Government Relations CLARINGTON Proud Home of Darlington Nuclear 1 = Clarinqton Board of Trade and Office of Economic Development What It Takes t ® Get There . . . Increase Additional Additional programming Benefit Resources $30,000 Professional Boardroom Rental Ability to meet clients in a professional operational Space Increase education and confidential setting programming Increase programming and opportunities Resource and research space for our business community $ 55,000. 1 staff Dedicated person for Real Quicker response to investment leads Human member Estate land and building Stronger sector based partnerships Resources Salary inventories Better understanding of industry needs adjustment Sector focused attraction and retention initiatives $30,000 Marketing Increase marketing efforts for Increased interest in investment Functional business attraction and community awareness $115,000 Clarinqton Board of Trade and Office of Economic Development An Important Message We must not assume that investment is ours , our neighbouring communities enjoy proximity to these major projects as well . INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY IS OURS TO LOSE ! Clarinqton Board of Trade and Office of Economic Development cAnADIRn TIRE Sustainable Initiatives Bowmanville, Ontario 1 Integrated Design Approach Site Building Envelope Lighting and Electrical SystenPP" Mechanical Systems Indoor Environment Materials Waste Operations 2 Innovation Challenge conventional thinking: Heating and Cooling a building • Lighting a building Operating a building 3 Mechanical Initiatives Hydronic Heating - I, �► Air Cooling Conventional HVAC RTU Fresh Air from Outside Warm Stale Air from l.side 3 stale Air� J- to Outside _ Pre-heatetl Fresh Air ko Insitle Energy Recovery Ventilation 4 Mechanical Initiatives Overhead doors tied to HVAC system When service centre doors open, HVAC shuts off Low-flow plumbing fixtures C Significant reduction in water consumptioi 5 Mechanical Initiatives Heat Reclaim through overhead = exhaust Ventilated Thermal Panel 4 Pre-warms outside air, thereby LI reducing electricity consumption during heating season ' ®POI 6 Lighting Initiatives Fluorescent Retail Lighting Height and configuration are key LED Lighting , • Exterior applications (wall packs, building signage), and the interior ® office and administration areas. Clearstory Windows Reduces lighting requirement during daylight hours 7 Envelope Considerations White Roof Reduces summer cooling demands by reflecting solar radiation Thermal Scan of Building Identifies insulation/sealing deficiencies in building envelope s Other Considerations Recycled Building Material Target 15% recycled content Regional Building Material Targeting 20% regional material Low VOC paints, adhesives, sealants, and caulkings Construction Waste Management Targeting 75% waste diversion from landfill Green housekeeping 9 Questions 10