Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
C14-0002 Report Portrait R01 (1)
(Leading the Way Newcastle ® King Avenue Revitalization Streetscape Master Plan and Implementation Strategy i - Client Reference CSS.KINGAVE.1 � r -•. � Yyb'z� Ili October2014 Cima+ project C14-0002 111 - CWA*k Partners in excellence 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 01 1.2 Study Area 02 1.3 Study Process 02 1.4 Background Notes 03 1.5 Background Documents 03 1.5.1 The Newcastle Village Community Improvement Plan 1.5.2 Newcastle Parking Study 1.5.3 Newcastle Village Centre Secondary Plan 1.5.4 Newcastle Village Centre Urban Design Guidelines 1.5.5 Newcastle Central Area CIP Review and Five Year Plan 2.0 COMMUNITY• 2.1 Newcastle Streetscape Steering Committee 05 2.2 Public Information Centre 05 2.3 Clarington Operations 06 3.0 STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS 3.1 Street Markers in Sidewalk 07 3.2 Raised Planting Beds in Bump -Outs 07 3.3 Paving 08 3.3.1 Concrete Sidewalk 3.3.2 Coloured Impressed Asphalt Boulevard/Amenity Area 3.3.3 Asphalt 3.3.4 Decorative Crosswalks 3.4 Evaluation of Material Options (Raised Planting Beds and Boulevard Treatments) 09 3.5 Overhead Banner 11 3.6 Lighting 11 3.7 Site Furniture 12 3.8 Seating Areas 13 3.9 Village of Newcastle Gateway Signs 14 3.10 Street Trees 16 3.11 Planters in Boulevard Areas 17 3.12 Rubberized Tree Mulch 17 3.13 Soil Cells for Trees 18 a 1 STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN -. King Avenue Streetscape Improvements L-Al — L-A3 Mill Street Streetscape Improvements L-A4 Plant List and Pictures L-A5 5 � rr 5.1 Cost Estimate and Implementation Strategy 5.2 Suggested Implementation Timeline 5.3 Funding Opportunities Tree Inventory and Assessment Report Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Public Information Centre Comment Sheets 19 19 20 1.0 Introduction 1.0 Introduction Streets are a vital part of a community's public open -space system. They function as movement corridors for pedestrians, cyclists, public transit and vehicles, and support many social and business activities. The appearance and character of a community's public realm supports the success of the downtown. Basic aspects of a successful streetscape: • Pedestrian Friendly — pedestrians should experience safety, comfort, and efficient mobility • Attractive — well -designed and maintained streets provide aesthetic pleasure, facilitate a sense of well-being for users and convey the message that the space is cared for and valued • Establish or reinforce the identity of a district — streetscape design should provide a unified/cohesive design and appearance ("theme"); reflect local character and encompass activity context • Universal Design — streetscapes should be accessible to all ages and address all mobility needs. Wherever possible, streetscapes should be designed to meet barrier -free standards. • Safety — streetscapes should promote pedestrian, cyclist and vehicular safety • Functional — accommodate all community needs without dominating one function (e.g., pedestrian movement, social exchange, commerce, service and maintenance and parking), provide efficient circulation of all transportation modes, and accommodation and protection of utility routes. • Maintenance — critical to the vitality and success of streetscapes. Materials, furnishings, and plantings used in streetscape projects should be selected for their durability as well as ease of maintenance, servicing, and replacement. However, no matter how durable original materials are, or how carefully they are installed, they will not last without regular maintenance (especially true for landscape plantings which require regular maintenance to keep them thriving and attractive). Consideration of winter maintenance (snow and ice control, snow storage) is also important, both in terms of ease of implementation and impact on streetscape functionality during winter months. CWAkNewcastle King Avenue Revitalization 1.2 Study Area Based on input from the Municipality of Clarington and the Streetscape Steering Committee, the limits of the study area were determined to be King Avenue from the North Street / Baldwin Street intersection to the Arthur Street / Brookhouse Street intersection, and Mill Street from the Emily Street intersection extending north to the vicinity of the driveway area at 50 Mill Street property. Gateway feature locations marking entrances into the Village of Newcastle were also included in the study due to the potential of these areas to provide visual impact and community branding and opportunities for people travelling along Highway 2. 1110. 7�1 1.3 Study Process The Municipality appointed a Streetscape Steering Committee to guide the study process. The Committee was comprised of representatives from the Business Improvement Association (BIA), Community Improvement Plan (CIP), Region of Durham, Newcastle Ratepayers Association, Syvan Developments, and the Municipality of Clarington Planning and Engineering Departments. The scope of the study included: • Collection and review of background material • Preparation of base mapping using aerial photography • Study Area Inventory and Analysis (including Tree Inventory and Assessment Report) • Project Initiation Meeting with Steering Committee • Development of Concepts and Alternatives for Streetscape Improvements • Concept Review meeting with Steering Committee • Concept Design Refinement and preparation of presentation materials for Public Information Centre (PIC) • Public Information Centre • Preparation of the Village of Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization Streetscape Master Plan and Implementation Strategy document CWAkNewcastle King Avenue Revitalization 1.4 Background Notes Within the Community Improvement Plan Study Area, King Avenue from North Street / Baldwin Street to Arthur Street is acknowledged to be the Newcastle Village Centre in Newcastle. Consultant staff originally involved in the project were retained through CIMA+ in Bowmanville to complete the Streetscape Master Plan and Implementation Strategy for the Newcastle Streetscape when AECOM's Cobourg office was closed in March 2014. 1.5 Background Documents Previously completed documents relevant to this study were reviewed to ensure that the Streetscape Master Plan would meet previously establised requirements and recommendations. The documents and information applicable to the Streetscape Master Plan are summarized as follows: 1.5.1 The Newcastle Village Community Improvement Plan (April 2008) Identified various priorities: Short -Term Priorities related to streetscape improvements include: • Heritage street lighting to extend along King Avenue East to Arthur Street and down Mill Street from Wilmot Street to Emily Street • Prominent entrance features Long -Term Priorities related to streetscape improvements include: • Directional signage to downtown • Guidelines for streetscape improvement (the streetscape section of the plan notes that the CIP area would benefit from streetscape improvements and/or traffic calming measures) • Guidelines for signage styles 1.5.2 Newcastle Parking Study (April 2010) Summary and Recommendations: • Overall, weekday demand is higher than Saturday demand • On -street demand is higher on King Avenue than Beaver and Mill Streets • Weekday on -street demand peaks at 77 percent at 1:50pm and again at 2:30pm • Weekday off-street demand peaks at 42 percent in the late -afternoon (3:30 and 4:OOpm) • Parking duration and turnover characteristics indicate that the prime on -street parking spaces exist on King Avenue between Mill Street and Beaver Street and that these spaces are being used properly for short-term parking (less than 1 hour) CWAL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization 1.5.3 Newcastle Village Centre Secondary Plan (August 2010) Goal: • To preserve and enhance the Village Centre as the functional and symbolic point of economic, social, and cultural activity in Newcastle Village by providing retail facilities, housing, symbolic points of interest, and community and cultural facilities Objectives relative to Streetscape: • To preserve and enhance the unique character of the Village Centre as a heritage mainstreet • To establish an eastern gateway to the Village Centre The Municipality, in co-operation with local businesses, will: • Promote the historic downtown as a point of tourist activity • Undertake streetscape improvements • Encourage fagade and signage improvements Council shall ensure the continued safe and efficient traffic operations on King Avenue and subject to budgetary approval, may consider the following measures: • Improving road geometry, rationalizing lane arrangements • Widening sidewalks and incorporating streetscape enhancements to improve the pedestrian environment • Reviewing regulations for on -street parking 1.5.4 Newcastle Village Centre Urban Design Guidelines (June 2013) Summary: • Contemporary interpretations of traditional designs are encouraged • Guidelines act to help enhance and protect the existing character and heritage of the downtown districts • The guidelines propose ways to continue to improve private and public realms through tentative architecture and streetscape opportunities 1.5.5 Newcastle Central Area CIP Review and Five Year Plan (November 2013) This five year plan for Downtown Newcastle addresses design, accessibility and tourism. Streetscape elements included in the recommendations are summarized as follows: • Plant additional roadside trees, and provide growing space (bioswales were suggested; due to the limited pedestrian space available, underground provision for increased soil volume is being suggested in this report instead of bioswales) • Flags/Banners suggested on light poles • Traffic Calming on King Avenue should be implemented • Accessibility of Sidewalks and Crosswalks • Village Gateway Signage • Downtown entrance archway gateways • Overhead banners With the exception of downtown archways, all of the streetscape elements included in the Five Year Plan have been addressed in the King Avenue Revitalization Streetscape Master Plan. CWANL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization 2.0 Community Input, Issues and Vision 2.0 Community Input, Issues and Vision 2.1 Newcastle Streetscape Steering Committee The Streetscape Steering Committee identified the following issues to be addressed in the development of the Streetscape Plan (please also refer to meeting minutes included in Appendix B for additional information): • The streetscape plan should reflect the two different districts of the Newcastle Village Centre (downtown core, King Avenue from North Street / Baldwin Street to the library, and east downtown area from the library to Arthur Street), providing some unifying elements and some unique/varying elements • Streetscape character/ theme should reflect the 1850's historical period as well as the area's agricultural heritage • Consideration of traffic safety, especially visibility issues pulling out from No Frills parking lot • Consideration of traffic calming measures, especially at North St. and Beaver St. locations • Consider/accommodate agricultural equipment that travels through the study area • CIP does not approve of the use of bollards • Consideration of Lakefront Trail cycling route (King Avenue west from Mill Street) • Remove and replace existing lighting with a unified lighting system throughout study limits • Streetscape elements (i.e., paving, benches) should reflect/complement recent improvements and installations (i.e., new landscape installation at Town Hall) • Provide gateway signage at the west and east entrances to downtown (similar to the existing signage feature at the Shopper's Drug Mart parking lot) 2.2 Public Information Centre (February 19, 2014) Summary of Stakeholder Input (Public, Steering Committee, and Clarington Staff comments) The following comments were noted at the public meeting: • Support for additional seating areas in the downtown area • Support for chess tables in seating areas • Support for hanging baskets • Don't use tree guards • Bike racks and trash cans should have more of a heritage look than the images included in PIC presentation materials — they were perceived as too modern • Suggestion to use above -grade tree planters instead of flower planters (this suggestion was not carried out because most of the boulevard space adjacent to the sidewalk is only 0.9m wide, insufficient for a raised planter that could accommodate trees) • Concern about vandalism of fibreglass planters proposed in the boulevard in the east section, and concern about moving them for the winter CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization • Material/finish of planters — for the fibreglass planter some people thought they look too modern, should have more of a heritage look — for the bump -out planters there was support for a red brick look (to match the Massey building) or a veneer that would look like dry stone — important to have a heritage look, not modern (movable planters have not been included in the proposed streetscape because of concerns about vandalism and maintenance) • Concern that Linden trees can be messy, with another comment that it's a great tree with wonderful fragrance when in flower (Potential concern is that this species can be somewhat susceptible to aphids, then honeydew can make things sticky under the tree canopy. A benefit of using Linden would be consistency with the existing tree species along the street.) • Ivory Silk Tree Lilac was suggested as an alternative (species revisions have been made since the PIC to include some Ivory Silk Tree Lilac and Chanticleer Pears) Comment sheets received at the PIC are included in Appendix C. 2.3 Clarington Operations The following comments were received from Clarington Operations Management: • We would prefer no interlocking brick. This is an ongoing maintenance issue with us as you are well aware. • If bump outs are part of the plan, consider mountable curbs in these areas and replace interlock with patterned concrete. • Who will be responsible for the various planting beds? The Newcastle Horticultural Society have their hands full with the Newcastle Community Hall Gardens and the Department does not have the resources. • Consider columnar species for downtown areas with areas with limited boulevard space. Staff is recommending ivory silk tree, columnar maple, frontier elm and Chanticleer Pear. Staff also are concerned about pruning and planting space in the beds. • We certainly are in favour of the rubberized mulch for the tree pits. We have tried this at two locations in Newcastle and quite pleased with the results. • Even though we are not extremely happy with the concrete planters being proposed, we understand that this is a high priority for the Community committee. Please be aware placement is important since it will hamper with our snow removal operations in the downtown. • Bump outs will create additional maintenance for snow removal. To assist us we are recommending a smooth transition from bump out to barrier curb and proper drainage (catch basin) be installed. • Do we need to protect the decorative street lights from vehicular traffic? Alternate boulevard paving options have been included in Section 3. Mountable curbs have not been included because a barrier curb provides better protection for pedestrians. Tree spe- cies have been altered to include some of the species suggested. CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization 4 3.0 StreetscaEIS ments 3.0 Streetscape Elements 3.1 Street Markers in Sidewalk Similar to the street markers in the Old Bowmanville Neighbourhood, granite markers are proposed in the sidewalks at street intersections to provide street names on the horizontal walking surface. The font used to engrave street names should have a heritage character, and could include an image inherent to Newcastle such as Community Hall. V111age a � g Eve ue yVOt: 3.2 Raised Planting Beds in Bump -Outs Raised planters have been proposed in the bump -out areas (with the exception of the bump -out adjacent to a GO bus stop area at North Street). The planters will provide visual interest and traffic calming along with a physical barrier for the protection of pedestrians waiting to cross the street. The planters will be short enough so as to not impede the sight lines of drivers, and the height of plant material will also need to be chosen with consideration of sight lines. Poured -in -place concrete has been proposed with an impressed pattern in the form liner to provide interest. Coloured concrete could be used and the finish could be made to resemble brick, dry stone, or another material. Concrete Finished to replicate Dry Stone Wall Precast Planters (image from Old Kingstn Road, Ajax) c 3.3 Paving Sidewalks and paving are an integral component of pedestrian -friendly street systems. Sidewalks and walkway materials must be accessible, slip -resistant and easy to maintain (smooth for snow removal and resistant to buckling and cracking). The preliminary Streetscape Plan recommends a concrete sidewalk for the primary travel way, with decorative impressed coloured asphalt located in the `amenities/fixtures/utility zone,' and in special paving areas such as bump -outs. 3.3.1 Concrete Sidewalk Replacement of the existing concrete sidewalk is proposed from North Street / Baldwin Street to the library on the north side of King Avenue, and from North Street / Baldwin Street to just east of the old Fire Station on the south side of King Avenue. At approaches to drop curbs CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization where crosswalks are located, concrete sidewalk should have, cane detectable texture (incised lines in the concrete) as per Ontario Provincial Standards, to aid persons with visual limitations. 3.3.2 Coloured Impressed Asphalt Boulevard/ Amenity Area The recommended boulevard treatment is Streetprint — Genuine Stamped Ashpalt in a Slate pattern (random appearance), Fawn or Khaki colour, selected to complement existing landscape installations at Community Hall as well as existing architecture and heritage buildings. Concrete Finished to replicate red brick on Massey Building Unit pavers to match the existing pavers at Community Hall were considered but not recom- mended due to the typical problems with unit pavers, including trip hazards due to settlement and heaving, cracking, weeds growing between pavers, and colour fading. Coloured impressed asphalt technology has improved significantly in recent years, and the product is extremely durable and more cost effective than unit pavers. The surface is skid resistant, colour stable, wear resistant, and can be recoated to renew the colour and further extend the asphalt life if necessary. If the boulevard area is damaged due to maintenance requirements, it can be rein- stated with asphalt and the area can be reheated and recoated to match undamaged areas. 3.3.3 Asphalt A lump sum item has been included in the cost estimate for asphalt, to include repair to drive- ways and roadway where necessary along the edges of boulevard construction. An Option Price has been included in the cost estimate for grinding and overlay of the road- way. The condition of the existing asphalt roadway would be examined prior to detailed design to determine the requirements such as replacement of curb and gutter, adjustment of catch basins and water valves, and crack repair. These requirements have been considered and estimated in the Option Price. 3.3.4 Decorative Crosswalks An Option Price has been included in the Cost Estimate to install coloured impressed cross- walks at the intersections of King Avenue with North/Baldwin Streets, Mill Street, and Arthur Street/Brookhouse Drive. Decorative crosswalks would not be installed until traffic lights have been installed because of the sense of safety that is implied by a defined crosswalk. Signals are scheduled in 2014 for the intersection at Arthur Street/Brookhouse Drive. The need for traffic signals at North/Baldwin Streets is anticipated in the future when warranted by traffic volume. The high -wear nature of a decorative crosswalk experiencing high traffic volume and turning movements requires a more durable treatment of coloured impressed asphalt than that used in the boulevard areas. Traffic Patterns is a thermoplastic application applied to existing asphalt that results in a skid resistant surface with the appearance of unit pavers. Colour and pattern options are diverse. See page 9 for a summary of the benefits and drawbacks of alternative materials for the raised planters and the surface treatment, including cost estimates for each material. CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization L �� o•m c U c L to o a) E a) C c ' a m > (o cm Oco 72 U O 'i '> : O 7 IL O O c a a L L O O U) � O (n O O :r N a a c U OO m C O O 0) O U a) C J a) CL. E QU)) io E a O M N a) (o O L O a O 0aci LM U a) 0 U) U p V/ a) O 0 O L O a) Q U 4) > Q U M M Q m a O 0- (i) c E c .2) 'i �Q o a`u)� olo,� . � c M o Y U .0 a 0 O N N a V c a {� T a L a) c O c00-0 Q O a) Cl) (6 O W 4) M L -0c E m (� O O U o 0) U a) Z_ > c 4- N sz +- ° a a Z Q M � c L cn C a E Q o c 7-0 M W�/� v/ NU") V a O ai O N N M .� L s � x x L t 2 2 3 � J O O U a) a a m Z 41 :5 E O O f6 c M 0- :3 O•m I U (n A I M - a- L a c a) p a cn a) a) `� E ° �_ O U L) �'� c a c M O 00 0 a) M c a) ° U (n Co a) Y U Z U Q 0- O •U - U • �o >.� c.2) (7a 0 a) Q) c - •O- co 0 a M (B ° p CO U a co a) ° ° - N u> v O 0 c O a U) N .O a U a) C V :� 00 ° U) Oo �� Uc J�5 cE O s t a) � x x E � L o � a) � 000 0 000 0 • 000 co Cl) Cl) co O Liz Liz Lf) (D O O O � CL d (1 (L CL CL CL CL t (D � co y a 0 > p > M �U O c°a �� L 0 C L a) O L LL co Um Q IL Q C d (1) r Z W Q W w F- Q W J 7 O m E 3 O a LM J x x t t s i x 2 2 2 U U Q Q N L Y N U) L _ a) ) _ O _ O E c c M O O E CU O c Q O a) O O O .� M O T m .� M a E U a) O L ) O m U w<an) N >O 0 C p Q 'C = 0-0 U . aQL)a) c M .a) a) aa � 2 ' a p U c M U) O 0 a 0 .O 7 a M a) O O_ 0 �p N Q 0 N U O U a m a) � O > U p 0 a) a a) a) O C 0 U a) a d a) 'O a) cm M Q- O M � •�. (D 0) - �. c.0 Q O =. r M E '�. N • 0 >' M o U >' (6 0 U U 'O N 7 0 M 0 U O ° O O cn (n c ° p a Co(p c a) (n U) c a m U M 0- 0 M= � 2c cn c ° : i w �.0 Q U .� 0 .� U a) U cnn .0 U 'L a) a) O O U O V i 0 U O U O 0 a) i O •M O -0 •M O '(6 O 'O 00 _0 O 0 0 • — 'U6 O U ` — O M U '000 a) LL N E a) coo) � r O N E O co Q :) 0 O N co > O O N O d U a O m U d U) � a O f° cn c f U U � a � co U) z U O m U O O O O U m O O O U p O U M -0U M a .T) N M .0 M a .T) a) -0M U M a .� a) -0 M a .D N o c o ) t J N O O O O O O O O O O O != O O O O O O O O O O O O O 000 �E O O O O O O 000 O O O O O O O O O O O LO O O Ln O O O O O O UC O O LO Q O O O O O LO 0 O LO p 0Ln0 Uf) p O NLn p O�Ln N Ci CDNLf) P- �_ O O r- Uf) V co � LO Ln N co N LO M LO LO M P.-(D rl_ (D LO m 0) Ln W V O r- � (� Ki EA ER 6s U) m EA EA EA c dT 69 :-. , F- N M CL d d .. I- d .--.. .. .. E N M d d d .. H d ..-.. .. .. � N M d dCL ..- I- D- � N M d d d .. I- d Q o m o U) U G a L M U)W MM a 0-6 a iI > > i� > ' Q) V) -0 E � r L in L a) N > L U) �) U) Rlcla io/^M a) o c.c- a m p ac I..L L I..L L i- O c- c = d+=C7 c Q dU EU � 3 m(j EQ O Q C C O U) w+ 3 (n Visualizations of Proposed Raised Planting Beds in Bump -outs and Boulevard Paving Before Before CWA*AL After `A' - see drawing LA-2 After `B' - see drawing LA-1 Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization 3.5 Overhead Banner The Steering Committee communicated that the BIA has expressed interest in a place to hang an overhead banner to advertise events. The location proposed is across the bump -out adjacent to Church Street where it would be easily visible from the majority of the downtown core. A decorative pole to match the street lighting poles would be installed across from a light pole, and an extension would be included on the light pole to allow for hanging banners at a sufficient height. Whether the Talisman decorative pole proposed will be sufficient to support the overhead banner will depend on the size of the banner; this will need to be confirmed during detailed design. Before After `C' - Downtown Banner Visualization - see drawing LA-1 3.6 Lighting Lighting of the streetscape requires the provision of appropriate illumination of the roadway, sidewalks, walkways, and bike lanes. The proposed lighting system should be functionally appropriate and properly scaled to both pedestrians and vehicles, increasing security and pe- destrian safety and comfort. The proposed lighting style should integrate and complement the local architectural vocabulary and functions as a unifying element along with other streetscape items including trees, benches and paving. The existing lighting system within the Downtown Newcastle study area is a combined system of the standard cobra head fixtures and mast lighting as well as lower pedestrian scale poles with acorn fixtures which are strictly decorative in function. The Streetscape Master Plan recommends the removal of the existing lighting system within the study area and replacing it with a unified lighting assembly. The recommended lighting assembly includes a decorative concrete pole with a pendant light fixture on a scroll arm. CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization Light Fixture: King Luminaire K806 with decorative scroll arm (the proposed light fixture is available in LED and is Dark Sky certified. Concrete Pole: Talisman pole by Stresscrete Accessories: banner arms; hanging basket fixtures 3.7 Site Furniture Seating and Benches: • Waiting and resting areas along walkways provide welcome relief to pedestrians, and a place to sit together, interact, and observe. • Placing benches in the amenity/utility zone helps avoid conflicts and keep through -zones clear. • Seating provided in areas of high pedestrian traffic and/or areas of interest. Bench - Maglin MLB300-MH to match benches at Community Hall Heritage Garden Trash Receptacles: Maglin MRC202 • Trash receptacles may be the most used streetscape element and should be conveniently located for pedestrian traffic near benches, bus stops, and other activity nodes. • Receptacles should be easily accessible for trash collection and maintenance. • Covered tops and sealed bottoms should be included to keep contents dry and pests out. CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization Bicycle Racks: Maglin MBR200 Customized with `Village of Newcastle' around ring. • Should be permanently mounted and placed in convenient locations throughout public spaces to encourage bicycle use • Should be placed so as not to obstruct views or cause hazards to pedestrians or drivers and minimize obstructions for snow clearing operations in the winter 3.8 Seating Areas A seating area is proposed at Joseph Atkinson Parkette. The area would include a small unit paver path from the sidewalk to the existing sign, with benches placed on concrete, and accent plantings behind the sign and historic plaque. There is potential to install a chess table as an alternate to benches. Unfortunately, during the December 2013 ice storm, a tree branch in the parkette failed and broke the historic plaque. A community member collected the pieces as the snow and ice receded, and upon finding out that replacement of the plaque would be very costly and take a considerable amount of time to replace, he has coordinated an attempt to repair the plaque. It is hoped that the plaque will be reinstalled in its place and the seating area can be incorporated around the plaque. CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization 3.9 Village of Newcastle Gateway Signs The Newcastle CIP divides signage into 5 categories: directional/wayfinding, storefront signs,community events signage, banners and community entry features or gateways. Gateways are often signage or landmark elements placed at either end of a community providing a sense of entry. The existing gateway signage at Mill and Emily Street was recommended to be used as a model for the proposed gateway signage during the meeting on October 30th, 2013 (refer to Appendix B). Consensus was reached that newly proposed gateway signage would be placed at either end of the downtown district of Newcastle on King Avenue to enhance the district's identity. The proposed gateway features would be constructed from materials to match (as closely as possible) the existing signage at Mill and Emily Streets. Furthermore, up -lighting directed at the sign (See Appendix B) was recommended to enhance the gateway signage at night similar to the existing gateway sign at Mill and Emily Streets. Keymap CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization Visualization - East Gateway Before Potential for additional event signage under Newcastle sign Visualization - West Gateway Before After - in spring/summer CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization 3.10 Street Trees Street trees are a vital part of any streetscape, providing numerous environmental, social/ health, and economic benefits for a community. Trees can help to define spatial volume and rhythm along the length of the streetscape, and provide spring bloom, summer shade, fall foliage color, winter branching, and an opportunity for holiday lighting and decorating during the winter. Trees must be thriving in order to provide their many benefits, and mature trees provide much greater benefit than small trees. In order to mature and thrive, trees need sufficient quality and quantity of soil, oxygen, water and essential nutrients. Investment in Street Trees (protection of existing trees and planting of new ones) should be given a high priority. The majority of the existing trees that are located in hard surface bou- levard areas are Norway Maples that are a range of sizes. (Norway Maple is an invasive, non-native species that is frequently used in urban settings, but it has many structural prob- lems and is susceptible to tar spot, an unsightly fungal disease that causes large black spots on the leaves.) There are also some small, recently planted Honeylocust trees, and three (3) Lindens, one (1) of which is small and stunted (replacement is recommended). The other two Lindens have grown quite large and have a significant presence on the street. The tree species that typically survive in urban conditions with very limited soil space are Honeylocust and Ornamental Pear. Other species that are commonly used tend to decline and die over about five (5) years, and typically do not provide a valuable contribution to the streets - cape. If soil cells are used, greater species diversity could be included along the streetscape. A variety of tree species have been included for new planting. These species are: Botanical Name Acer saccharum `Green Mountain' Corylus colurna Ginkgo biloba `Princeton Sentry' Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline' Pyrus calleryana `Chanticleer' Syringa reticulate `Ivory Silk' Tilia cordata `Glenleven' Common Name Green Mountain Sugar Maple Turkish Hazel Columnar Ginkgo Skyline Honeylocust Chanticleer Pear Ivory Silk Tree Lilac Glenleven Linden Images of the trees are shown on Drawing No. LA-5 in Section 4. The Ivory Silk Tree Lilac and Chanticleer Pear have been added following comments from the Public Information Centre and Clarington Operations. CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization 3.11 Planters in Boulevard areas Planters were proposed in the boulevards east of the library, but following comments and concerns raised at the Public Information Centre regarding maintenance and potential vandalism, the stand-alone planters have been removed from the plan. 3.12 Rubberized Tree Mulch Rubberized mulch was installed around trees that were planted at the Community Hall, and the mulch has been well received as an aesthetically pleasing, low maintenance solution. Rubber mulch does not decompose, and does not blow and shift the way bark mulch can. It tends to be a deterrent to weed germination, fungal growth and insects. CWAkNewcastle King Avenue Revitalization 3.13 Soil Cells for Trees The benefits of trees include social benefits (calming effect, crime reduction, personal attachment and sense of ownership and pride), environmental benefits (climate moderation, improved air quality, reduction in stormwater runoff, wildlife habitat), and economic benefits (increased property value, reduced energy costs). Inadequate soil volume for trees in urban areas causes limited potential in the form of slow growth, small size, and shorter life. Trees that are essentially potted in confined urban planting spaces typically die within a few years, or if they are vigorous enough, their roots might grow into small spaces between pavement and compacted subgrade, which can lead to pavement damage as roots enlarge. Trees have been proposed behind the sidewalks where possible, in lawn areas where the soil volume available for root growth is much greater than in the boulevard. For the trees that are proposed in the hard surface boulevard (amenities/fixtures/utility zone), an amount has been included in the cost estimate for installing soil cells to provide adequate soil volume to sustain significant tree growth. While expensive, providing soil cells for tree root growth allows for the benefits of mature trees to be realized, and essentially eliminates the cost of tree replacement that should otherwise be expected every 3-10 years. When measuring the vastly increased benefits of larger trees, a Lifecycle Cost Analysis completed in 2011 by DeepRoot (manufacturers of Silva Cells) estimates that the benefits of installing soil cells outweighs the costs by $25,427.22 over a 50 year study period for a typical urban tree in Minneapolis, MN. The analysis did not quantify other tree benefits such as increased tax base and higher property value, reduced pavement maintenance costs due to shade, and studies that indicate that people shopping in well -landscaped business districts are willing to pay more for parking and up to 12% more for goods and services. The full analysis and reference information is available at: http://www. deeproot. comisilvapdfs/resources/articlesILifecycleCostAnalysis. pdf CONCRETE CURB, POSITIONED OVER CELL POSTS 125mm CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE CURB. SIZED PER PROJECT 2BOmm AGGREGATE BASE COURSE SPECIFICATIONS.POSITIONED OVER CELL POSTS. PAVERS TO BE PERMANENTLY ADHERED TO CONCRETE. GEDTEXTILE, 18"(455mm) MINIMUM OVERLAP PAST EXCAVATION E 3'(75mm) COMPOST BETWEEN SILVA CELL DECK AND PLANTING SOIL. o OR 1"(25mm) AIR SPACE . ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY SURFACE DEEPROOT UB16-2 ROOT BARRIER SCREW CELL DECKS TO FRAMES (FOR EACH) AFTER SNAPPING IN PLACE 4 IFII II II _ 100-0 PERFORATED PIPE w/ FILTER SOCK FOR PASSIVE ANGLE OF REPOSE, VARIES PER IRRIGATION SYSTEM (REFER TO SPEC) PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS = PLANTING SOIL, TAMPED TO GEOGRID. 'J' 15Gmm MINIMUM BELOW BACKFILL AT BASE. MAX. 85% COMPACTION = OVERLAP 300mm MINIMUM AT TOP OF CELLS. BELOW ROOT PACKAGE ri BACKFILL, INSTALLED IN 200mm MAX. LIFTS (2 LIFTS PER CELL), COMPACTED TO 959. OR BY 3 PASSES WITH PLATE COMPACTOR, WHICHEVER IS GREATER \ Smm X 300- ZIP TIES, ATTACHING GE GRID TO SILVA CELLS AT EACH LEVEL AND AT CELL DECK PROVIDE INSPECTION RISER ANCHOR EACH SILVA CELL TO GROUND WITH (4) 250mm SPIKE. <10_ DIA., SEE CELL BASE FOR SPIKE HOLE SILVA CELL BASE SLOPE TO MATCH CROSS -SLOPE OR FLOW -LINE SLOPE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, TO MAX. 5% GEOTEXTILE ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE. NOTE THAT GEOTEXTILE IS NOT REQUIRED IF DETERMINED BY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. PLANTING SOIL PER SILVA CELL SPECIFICATIONS, INSTALLED IN 200mm LIFTS (2 LIFTS PER CELL) 100m AGGREGATE SUB BASE, COMPACTED TO 95% OR BY 3 PASSES WITH PLATE COMPACTOR, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. CONNECT TO STORM DRAIN FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE WITH 100mm NON PERFORATED SUBDRAIN SUBGRADE BELOW GEOTEXTILE AND AGGREGATE BASE COURSE COMPACTED TO 95% OR BY 3 PASSES WITH PLATE COMPACTOR. WHICHEVER IS GREATER CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization 4.0 Streetscape Master Plan I- N.SITE �� E LU K\NUP�E ---- Lu O 0 n \N 3 = -- ®� o = C Gt G E P O NO (RILLS GROCERY STORE Y 4g� N\GNwP 0 C z 0 S G \ hCOERS UG _ a L DI S LS L CS LS ERS UG �� p�C SqN i 99 W 2) 200mm CONC SAN 1974 __ _ l DO Z 0 FPROPOSED BANNER g M/ g4i ___ — — Q r e �s LU CWAk M PNO 2oomm AC wM (1961) SLp q1�• �oomm c N ) Aso zoomm Rvc w � 2 7) a 0 9e 7� LU I PaE D - H ROSE S UG I] BRICK RJUFKS DG `S EXTENSIONfDR 'CI om 7S 3 II ... C O Gt PARKING LOT Z J Clarington o v � U J w a Leading the Way o � Cf E o m ° STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN ST. TO ARTHUR ST. NEWCASTLE ONTARIO 3 Mas. Lwu � � t GARDEN OFAGPOLE co 0 REAL ESTATE GARDEN GARDEN GARDEN ��\ = __. OFFICE SIGN BOX Si THE SNUG MIKE'S PUCE Sr T ASP . .,DLS —LP OHH _ 5 ue RocERS uc ER W N cc4s0mm COI SAN (1974) 4s0mm CONC SAN 1974) J NO T Z LL o 0 I.—Omm A W d' No. Date Description By 200mm WM (1961) W W ASPH W n*one ll W KING AVENUE w J oL " HHO ROGERS US ROGERS BIG FROM BALDWIN ST. TO Rs uc U 80m EAST OF MILL ST. TL LANDSCAPE PLAN HOME HARDWARE G O 1/2 SHOPPERS DRUG MARE LU LU 2b AS 1t Gt w °15C1LLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE J / J U BI .F U tsoo 3 / j E - + E BENCHG F.w"OC,4-oo02CSS. KINGAVE.1 1 _ L MAV 11 MATCH LINE LA-1 L. CULLEN REFER TO DRAWING LA4 ,. E..o. FOR LEGEND MAP SEE DRAWING U-4 MAV 2014 01 of 05 3 Hv RO 1 STY. F. BLD. BENJAMIN MOORE 1 WE 3 E N BO W N 1 1/2 STY F 2 STY. CONC. BLD. CalFLOWERS APPLE BLOSSOM LAUNDROMAT B O E A SPH I C oHH Visua CANHHn INP1 ROGER UG mamm ¢ PH.PARKING J ; U a 3 5mm z E g8o) Q WM tY aoom 149--'--W1 1/2SIY. F. H. z J 2 U a - q 2 STY. B. BUD. 01 L THE MASSEY BUILDING m � m ; TRASH ON �T]� DEE'S HARVEST TABLE 1 SITE REAL ESTATE Joseph Atkinson Porkette Sig / OFFICE ' toric Plaque �z O o qs o eati � 1 Area C �xM.ax. w -kfl�NUE EAST m U Z Q 0 libm O CWAk GO LU w Ix ROGERS G C O m to z 2 W Z Clari�gton m To m U Leading the Way c . STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO Seating Area KING AVENUE FROM Potential Benches/Chess Table BALDWIN ST. TO ARTHUR ST. NEWCASTLE ONTARIO m H U z_ 0 No. Date Description By LU W ne. U_ KING AVENUE FROM 80m EAST OF MILL ST. w z TO 240m EAST OF MILL ST. LANDSCAPE PLAN o15C1LLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE J S U 1500 F Q C14-0002 CSS.KINGAVE.1 L. r.Ex. MAV "xEx. wix�xo. LA-2 o Ex o�x L. CULLEN FOR LEGEND MAP SEE DRAWING LA-4 MAV 2114 02 of 05 C W U Q ESSO — 2 TC I FLAT IRONS .� HAIR SALON `/H6€N — — — H.,PCi PO 05SX811 KING AVENUE EAR 400 CEP WM (1993) l Rr ROGERS OH ROGEROH HLP279 � E � I' FW \ co C POTENTIAL FOR POTENTIAL FOR \ Pa INTERSECTION 11 TERSECTION a ENHANCEMENTS M = ENHANCEMENTS _ -FF _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - 400mm CPP WM (191 �L < LP _ m rn _ + - a C m ------>— ------ ------ O� 3 300mm -- LL1 E E m E E S9 400mm DI (1990) Z 400mm PP WM (1993) VENUE EAST � 200mm IPVC WM P119 0 n E & w. W 300mm PVC WM (1993) R GER U I] ROGERS OH HP ROGERS OH HYD POTE AL FOR o INTER ECTION ENHANCEMENTS B w Z rn J O Q = F N ♦ ,' m AS SITE 0 I 2 HGP� 11 1 11325 ■ "' 11. I Potential Intersection Enhancements CWA*AL Clan Ju Leading the way STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN ST. TO ARTHUR ST. NEWCASTLE ONTARIO No*[I D— Description By . mw a, KING AVENUE FROM 240m EAST OF MILL ST. 1. TO 80m EAST OF ARTHUR ST. +'k'`�' LANDSCAPE PLAN X LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 'F�noC14-oo02 n���CSS.KINGAVE.1 nex. L. MAY 'snen. wma ne. o Ex o Ex LA-3 L �BLLEN FOR LEGEND MAP SEE DRAWING LA-4 MAv 2014 no oa of as LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED DECIDUOUS STREET TREE ❑ RUBBERIZED MULCH SURFACING DECORATIVE LIGHTING POLE: STRESSCRETE, THE TALISMAN, BLACK gBANNER AND HANGING BASKET ARMS SCROLL ARM: STRESSCRETE, KA30—S, STANDARD SCROLL ARM cI DECORATIVE SCROLL FIXTURE: KING UMINAIRE, K506 SATELLITE SR, SHALLOW LENS ® PROPOSED DECORATIVE LIGHT (20' Pole) PROPOSED DECORATIVE LIGHT (25' Pole) EXISTING HYDRO POLE WITH 2.4m DECORATIVE SCROLL ARM AND K808 FIXTURE PROPOSED STANDARD COBRAHEAD ON EXISTING POLE •' PROPOSED BIKE RACK (MIMBR200—MH, Black) PROPOSED WASTE RECEPTACLE (Maglin, MRC-202, Black) PROPOSED BENCH (Maglin, MLB300-11011, Black) a PROPOSED STREET MARKER EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CURB 7 EXISTING DROP CURB EXISTING ASPHALT ROADWAY PROPOSED COLOURED IMPRESSED ASPHALT (— drawing LA-4) =PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED TOPSOIL AND SOD PROPOSED PLANTING BED loft • �I 0 0c) C�b air t _ C U LN J W M/S 31100 W Q � J mz------------------------------ MILL STREET a� < O oF- of 0LL LUW Of LL O WIn J a I Pc r TC I U G J M/S ONOO C C COLOURED IMPRESSED ASPHALT -SOLDIER COURSE COLOURED IMPRESSED ASPHALT -RANDOM PATTERN RAISED PLANTER E 30m O 0 t t Proposed Coloured Impressed Asphalt t .K o LU (� W Z in C`J Q Z LL, (600Z) NM 0Ad ' 00Z Q o O O Of I— LL X W W W LL O W � J Q SITE CWAk 0 wd PC W o 2 z Clari�gton U s � Leading the Way STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN ST. TO ARTHUR ST. NEWCASTLE ONTARIO No. I Date I Description I By MILL STREET 100m NORTH OF KING AVENUE TO EMILY STREET LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE A1.2 x C14-000z CSS. KINGAVE.1 L MAV "xEx. wix�xo. o� LA-4 L CULLEN MAVMI f E.xo_ 04 of 05 SITE Acer Saccharum 'Green Mountain' Green Mountain Sugar Maple Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skyline' Skyline Honeylocust Corylus colurna - Turkish Hazel Pyrus calleryana 'Chanticleer' Chanticleer Pear DECIDUOUS TREES Key Qty. Botanical Name Common Name Size Comments As 11 Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain' Green Mountain Sugar Maple 60mm W.B. Cy 4 Corylus columa Turkish Hazel 60mm W.B. Gb 9 Ginkgo biloba 'Princeton Sentry' Princeton Sentry Maidenhair Tree 60mm W.B. Gt 6 Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skyline' Skyline Honeylocust 60mm W.B. Pc 3 Pyrus calleryana'Chanticleer Chanticleer Pear 60mm W.B. Sr 2 Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk Ivory Silk Tree Lilac 60mm W.B. Tc 6 Tilia cordata 'Glenleven' Glenleven Linden 60mm W.B. Ginkgo biloba 'Princeton Sentry' Princeton Sentry Maidenhair Tree Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk' Ivory Silk Tree Lilac Tilia cordata 'Glenleven' Glenleven Linden ADS CWe*AL Clari��ton Leading the way STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN ST. TO ARTHUR ST. NEWCASTLE ONTARIO No, I D— I Description I By PLANT LIST AND PICTURES X LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE n.menx�C14-D002 CSS.KINGAVE.1 uxnnex. L. MAY 'amen. wma ne. o en o en. LA-5 cunt N unre. MAV 2014 er no. D5 of 05 5.0 Cost Estimate and m plementationStrategy 5.1 Cost Estimate and Implementation Strategy Implementation of the Streetscape Master Plan has been divided into three projects as shown in the in cost estimate on the following pages. It is suggested that these projects be implemented in the following order: 1. Gateway Signage (Project 3) — Implemented as soon as 2015. Gateway signs may be installed one at a time or both in the same year. 2. Seating Areas (Project 2) — Implemented as a stand-alone project with an advanced timeline. 3. Streetscape (Project 1) — Divided into 3 phases: • Phase 1 — North Street to Mill Street • Phase 2 — Mill Street to Beaver Street • Phase 3 — Beaver Street to East Project limit Cost savings may be realized by completing detailed design services for all projects and phases at once. Depending on available budget and funding opportunities, there is potential for significant savings if all phases listed under Project 1 are constructed in one year under a single contract; however, it is suggested that detailed design services for Project 1 be completed beginning in 2015 and that construction be completed at a rate of one phase per year from 2016 through to 2018. It should be noted that cost estimates provided are for the current construction year. Depending on the actual implementation schedule, some allowance should be made for increased costs due to annual inflation rates. 5.2 Suggested Implementation Timeline Jan- Apr- Oct- Jan- Apr- Apr- Apr - Project / Phase Mar Sept Dec Mar Sept Sept Sept 2015 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2018 Project 3 — Municipality to solicit quote(s) for * Gateway Signage installation Project 3 — Gateway Signage Installation Project 2 — Municipality to solicit quote(s) for * Seating Areas Project 2 — Construction of Seating Areas Project 1 — Streetscape Design and Tender * * Documents Project 1 — Phase 1: Streetscape Construction Project 1 — Phase 2: Streetscape Construction Project 1 — Phase 3: Streetscape Construction CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization 5.3 Funding Opportunities The Municipality of Clarington considered submission of an application to the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food's Rural Economic Development Program. This program has a Plan- ning Stream and an Implementation Stream with the following categories: Planning Stream 1. Economic Development Plans and/or Strategies 2. Research and/or Analysis to Support Planning and Priority -Setting Implementation Stream 1. Business/Sector Development and Diversification 2. Regional Marketing, Promotional and/or Branding Activities 3. Human Capital and Skills Development, Attraction and Retention Unfortunately, Streetscape Revitalization elements in this report are not eligible for funding under the program as projects designed to improve community aesthetics and functionality (e.g. streetscaping, green space development, murals, street lights, walkways, tree islands, etc.) are listed as an example of ineligible projects. Regardless, pursuit of the Ministry Rural Economic Development program by the Municipality may assist in securing funding from other sources through the demonstration of commitment that would be shown. Further opportunity for funding may be available through the Trillium Foundation if a commu- nity group such as the Newcastle Village BIA were to partner with the Municipality to submit a grant application. CWA*AL Newcastle King Avenue Revitalization Newcastle Streetscape - Muncipality of Clarington Preliminary Budget Estimate CLVA. Project 1 - Streetscape Unit Quantity 2014 Unit Price Total Phase 1 - North to Mill A - Site Works Site Preparation and Removals LS 100% $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 Protection of Existing Trees LS 100% $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Subtotal A $ 35,000.00 B - Site Services Light Standards - 20' ea 16 $ 6,000.00 $ 96,000.00 Banner Pole c/w Banner Attachment ea 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Adjust ex. Service Boxes, Handholes, etc. LS 100% $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 LS- Duct, Cable, Connection, Supply Grounds, etc. LS 100% $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 Subtotal B $ 136,000.00 C - Paving Concrete Sidewalk - remove and replace m2 1200 $ 65.00 $ 78,000.00 Concrete Entrances m2 30 $ 75.00 $ 2,250.00 Concrete Curb m 70 $ 75.00 $ 5,250.00 Coloured Impressed Asphalt Boulevard paving m2 500 $ 90.00 $ 45,000.00 Asphalt Paving LS 100% $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Traffic Paint - 100mm m 550 $ 6.00 $ 3,300.00 Traffic Paint - 400mm m 30 $ 50.00 $ 1,500.00 Traffic Paint- Symbols ea 6 $ 250.00 $ 1,500.00 Subtotal C $ 146,800.00 OPTION PRICE - Grind and Overlay road surface m2 2700 $ 28.00 $ 75,600.00 OPTION PRICE - Decorative Crosswalks at North/ Baldwin, not included in total m2 125 $ 185.00 $ 23,125.00 D - Planting Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain' ea 1 $ 400.00 $ 400.00 Corylus colurna ea 1 $ 450.00 $ 450.00 Ginko biloba'Princeton Sentry' ea 3 $ 525.00 $ 1,575.00 Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skycole' ea 5 $ 400.00 $ 2,000.00 Pyrus calleryana 'Chanticleer' ea 3 $ 475.00 $ 1,425.00 Tilia cordata 'Glenleven' ea 1 $ 400.00 $ 400.00 Tree Planting with Soil Cells/ Passive Irrigation ea 9 $ 10,000.00 $ 90,000.00 Rubberized Tree Mulch Supply and Installation ea 9 $ 500.00 $ 4,500.00 Top Soil in Planters ea 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 Perennial/ Shrub plantings for Raised Planters LS 2 $ 300.00 $ 600.00 Subtotal D $ 102,350.00 E - Site Furnishings Supply and Install Benches (incl. conc. pad base) ea 1 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Supply and Install Bike Racks (single post and ring) ea 3 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.00 Waste Receptacles (incl. concrete footings) ea 9 $ 2,800.00 $ 25,200.00 Street Markers in Sidewalk ea 14 $ 500.00 $ 7,000.00 Concrete Planters - poured in place ea 2 $ 9,600.00 $ 19,200.00 Subtotal E $ 55,400.00 PHASE 1 SUBTOTAL $ 475.550.00 Newcastle Streetscape - Muncipality of Clarington Preliminary Budget Estimate CWA%h.. Unit Quantity 2014 Unit Price Total F - General Bonding and Insurance LS 100% 3.00% $ 14,266.50 Mobilization and Demobilization LS 100% 3.00% $ 14,266.50 Traffic Control LS 100% $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 Engineering Design LS 100% 5% $ 23,777.50 Engineering Contract Administration LS 100% 10% $ 47,555.00 Non-refunable HST LS 100% 1.76% $ 8,369.68 Contingency LS 100% 10% $ 47,555.00 Subtotal F $ 185,790.18 PHASE 1 TOTAL $ 661,340.18 Phase 2 - Mill to Beaver A - Site Works Site Preparation and Removals LS 100% $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Protection of Existing Trees LS 100% $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 Subtotal A $ 17,500.00 B - Site Services Light Standards - 20' ea 6 $ 6,000.00 $ 36,000.00 Adjust ex. Service Boxes, Hand holes, etc. ea 100% $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 LS- Duct, Cable, Connection, Supply Grounds, ect. LS 100% $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 Subtotal B $ 71,000.00 C - Paving Concrete Sidewalk Paving m2 950.00 $ 65.00 $ 61,750.00 Concrete Entrances m2 135 $ 75.00 $ 10,125.00 Concrete Curb m 50 $ 75.00 $ 3,750.00 Coloured Impressed Asphalt Boulevard paving m2 425 $ 90.00 $ 38,250.00 Asphalt Paving LS 100% $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Traffic Paint - 100mm m 650 $ 6.00 $ 3,900.00 Traffic Paint - 400mm m 20 $ 50.00 $ 1,000.00 Traffic Paint- Symbols ea 0 $ 250.00 Subtotal C $ 128,775.00 OPTION PRICE - Grind and Overlay road surface m2 1550 $ 28.00 $ 43,400.00 OPTION PRICE - Decorative Crosswalks at Mill Street, not included in total m2 150 $ 185.00 $ 27,750.00 D - Planting Corylus colurna ea 1 $ 450.00 $ 450.00 Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skycole' ea 3 $ 400.00 $ 1,200.00 Syrin a Reticulata 'Ivory Silk' ea 3 $ 425.00 $ 1,275.00 Tree Planting with Soil Cells/ Passive Irrigation ea 6 $ 10,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Rubberized Tree Mulch Supply and Installation ea 6 $ 500.00 $ 3,000.00 Top Soil in Planters I ea 2 1 $ 500.00 1 $ 1,000.00 Perennial/ Shrub plantings for Raised Planters ea 2 $ 300.00 $ 600.00 Subtotal D $ 67,525.00 E - Site Furnishings Supply and Install Benches (incl. conc. pad base) ea 3 $ 2,500.00 $ 7,500.00 Supply and Install Bike Racks (single post and ring) ea 4 $ 800.00 $ 3,200.00 Waste Receptacles (incl. concrete footings) ea 6 $ 2,800.00 $ 16,800.00 Street Markers in Sidewalk ea 6 $ 500.00 $ 3,000.00 Concrete Planters - poured in place ea 2 $ 9,600.00 $ 19,200.00 Subtotal E $ 49,700.00 PHASE 2 SUBTOTAL $ 334,500.00 Newcastle Streetscape - Muncipality of Clarington Preliminary Budget Estimate CWAX. Unit Quantity 2014 Unit Price Total F - General Bonding and Insurance LS 100.00% 3.00% $ 10,035.00 Mobilization and Demobilization LS 100.00% 3.00% $ 10,035.00 Traffic Control LS 100% $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 Engineering Design LS 100% 5% $ 16,725.00 Engineering Contract Administration LS 100% 10% $ 33,450.00 Non-refunable HST LS 100% 1.76% $ 5,887.20 Contingency LS 100% 10% $ 33,450.00 Subtotal F $ 134,582.20 PHASE 2 TOTAL $ 469,082.20 Phase 3 - Beaver to East Project Limit A - Site Works Site Preparation and Removals LS 100% $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 Protection of Existing Trees LS 100% $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Subtotal A $ 25,000.00 B - Site Services Light Standards - 20' ea 7 $ 6,000.00 $ 42,000.00 Light Standards - 25' ea 10 $ 6,500.00 $ 65,000.00 Light Standards - Existing HP Mount - arm and light ea 6 $ 3,000.00 $ 18,000.00 Adjust ex. Service Boxes, Handholes, etc. LS 100% $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 LS- Duct, Cable, Connection, Supply Grounds, ect. LS 100% $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 CB relocation/ storm drainage @ Beaver St. LS 100% $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Subtotal B $ 165,000.00 C - Paving Concrete Sidewalk Paving m2 825.00 $ 65.00 $ 53,625.00 Concrete Entrances m2 125 $ 75.00 $ 9,375.00 Concrete Curb m 50 $ 75.00 $ 3,750.00 Coloured Impressed Asphalt Boulevard paving m2 1050 $ 90.00 $ 94,500.00 Asphalt Paving LS 100% $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Traffic Paint - 100mm m 850 $ 6.00 $ 5,100.00 Traffic Paint - 400mm m 30 $ 50.00 $ 1,500.00 Traffic Paint- Symbols ea 0 $ 250.00 $ - Subtotal C $ 177,850.00 OPTION PRICE - Grind and Overlay road surface m2 6500 $ 28.00 $ 182,000.00 OPTION PRICE - Decorative Crosswalks at Arthur Street / Brookhouse Drive, not included in total m2 235 $ 185.00 $ 43,475.00 D - Planting Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain' ea 10 $ 400.00 $ 4,000.00 Corylus colurna ea 2 $ 450.00 $ 900.00 Ginko biloba'Princeton Sentry' ea 6 $ 525.00 $ 3,150.00 Tilia cordata 'Glenleven' ea 5 $ 400.00 $ 2,000.00 Tree Planting with Soil Cells/ Passive Irrigation ea 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Rubberized Tree Mulch Supply and Installation ea 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 Top Soil in Planters LS 2 $ 200.00 $ 400.00 Perennial/ Shrub plantings for Raised Planters ea 2 $ 300.00 $ 600.00 Subtotal D $ 21,550.00 E - Site Furnishings Supply and Install Benches incl. conc. pad base ea 2 $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 Waste Receptacles (incl. concrete footings) ea 1 $ 2,800.00 $ 2,800.00 Street Markers in Sidewalk ea 8 $ 500.00 $ 4,000.00 Concrete Planters - poured in place ea 2 $ 9,600.00 $ 19,200.00 Subtotal E $ 31,000.00 PHASE 3 SUBTOTAL $ 420,400.00 Newcastle Streetscape - Muncipality of Clarington Preliminary Budget Estimate CLVA. Unit Quantity 2014 Unit Price Total F - General Bonding and Insurance LS 100% 3.00% $ 12,612.00 Mobilization and Demobilization LS 100% 3.00% $ 12,612.00 Traffic Control LS 100% $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 Engineering Design LS 100% 5% $ 21,020.00 Engineering Contract Administration LS 100% 10% $ 42,040.00 Non-refunable HST LS 100% 1.76% $ 7,399.04 Contingency LS 100% 10% $ 42,040.00 Subtotal F $ 60,224.00 PHASE 3 TOTAL $ 480,624.00 PROJECT 1 SUBTOTAL $ 1,611,046.38 Project 2 - Seating Areas A- Seating Areas off Streetscape Supply and Install Benches (incl. conc. pad base) ea 6 $2,500.001 $ 15,000.00 Unit paving m2 75 $175.00 $ 13,125.00 Plantings LS 100% $2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 Subtotal A $ 30,125.00 B - General Bonding and Insurance LS 100.00% 3.00% $ 903.75 Mobilization and Demobilization LS 100.00% 3.00% $ 903.75 Traffic Control LS 100% $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 Engineering Design LS 100% 5% $ 1,506.25 Engineering Contract Administration LS 100% 10% $ 3,012.50 Non-refunable HST LS 100% 1.76% $ 530.20 Contingency I LS 1 100% 1 10% $ 3,012.50 Subtotal B $ 11,368.95 PROJECT 2 SUBTOTAL $ 41,493.95 Project 3 - Gateway Signage A- Gateway Signage Gateway Signage - Material and Construction lea 1 2 $ 17,000.00 $ 34,000.00 Subtotal A $ 34,000.00 B - General Bonding and Insurance LS 100.00% 3.00% $ 1,020.00 Mobilization and Demobilization LS 100.00% 3.00% $ 1,020.00 Traffic Control LS 100% $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 Engineering Design LS 100% 5% $ 1,700.00 Engineering Contract Administration LS 100% 10% $ 3,400.00 Non-refunable HST LS 100% 1.76% $ 598.40 Contingency LS 100% 10% $ 3,400.00 Subtotal B $ 13,138.40 PROJECT 3 SUBTOTAL $ 47,138.40 f I re Inventory and Assessment Report AECO M A=COM 513 Division Street 905 372 2121 tel Cobourg, ON, Canada K9A 5G6 905 372 3621 fax www.aecom.com Tree Inventory and Assessment Date of Inspection: October 18, 2013 Project: King Street West, Newcastle Project Number : 60308123 Report By: Jesse Hamden, ISA Certified Arborist ON-1540A The assessment presented in this report has been made using accepted standard arboriculture techniques as outlined in Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9th Edition (2000). These techniques include visual examination of above -ground parts of each tree. The trees observed were not climbed, probed, cored, or dissected, and excavation for detailed root crown inspection was not performed. Since some symptoms may only be present seasonally, the extent of observations that can be made may be limited by the time of year in which the inspection took place. It must be realized that trees are living organisms, and their health and vigour continually change over time due to seasonal variations, changes in site conditions, and other factors. For this reason, the assessment presented in this report is valid at the time of inspection, and no guarantee is made about the continued health of trees that are deemed to be in good condition. It is recommended that the trees be re -assessed periodically. While every standing tree has the potential for failure and therefore poses some risk, a tree assessment is a good indication of present health and potential problems that could arise in the future. Trees were identified, sized, and assessed for condition. Each tree was given a subjective condition rating of Excellent, Good, Fair, or Poor. Following is a summary of how the ratings were determined: Excellent (E) no apparent health problems; good structural form Good (G) minor problems with health and/or structural form Fair (F) more serious problems with health and/or structural form Poor (P) major problems with health and structural form Very Poor (VP) extensive problems with health and structural form Dead (D) no live growth Tree size is expressed in Diameter at 1.4m above the base (DBH) and measured in cm. Tree locations are shown on Tree Inventory Drawings No. 1 to 3. The following chart summarizes the observations made concerning species, size and condition. Newcastle Streetscape Tree Inventory.Docx A=COM Tree Species Size Cond. Comments No. Page 2 Tree Inventory and Assessment King St W, Newcastle October 2013 1 Honeylocust 22.5 FG Adventitious shoots at base, multiple branches from same point of attachment, decay at pruning wounds, narrow branch angles with included bark, hydro pole adjacent, service wire extends through canopy, guy wire extends through canopy, small dead branches 2 Honeylocust 19.5 G Multiple branches from same point of attachment, narrow branch angles with included bark, fused branches, small dead branches, tip dieback, small bulges on trunk, no leaves present 3 Honeylocust 22.5 G Fused branches, small dead branches, narrow branch angles, no leaves present 4 Honeylocust 21 G Multiple branches from same point of attachment, decay at pruning wounds, canopy flat-topped, crossing branches, bulges on trunk, numerous small dead branches, seam on trunk, narrow branch angles with included bark 5 Scots Pine 43.5 F Codominant leaders, decay at pruning wounds, numerous small dead branches, fused branches, canopy slightly one-sided, needle dieback 6 Scots Pine 45.5 FG Sapsucker holes in trunk, decay at pruning wounds, low lateral branches fused to trunk, codominant leaders, narrow branch angles with included bark, small dead branches, needle dieback 7 Norway Maple 19.5 & 42, FP Multiple branches from same point of attachment at `Crimson King' 41, 30.5, 29 base with 4 main trunks, 1 trunk dead, 1 trunk with codominant leaders, burl on one trunk, grass growing in trunk union, column of decay in all trunks, crossing and fused branches, decay on lateral branch, tar spot, numerous dead branches >5cm, extensive dieback, narrow branch angles with included bark 8 Scots Pine 38 FG Multiple branches from same point of attachment, small dead branches, one-sided canopy, trunk lean, needle dieback, sapsucker holes in trunk, decay at pruning wounds 9 Garden G —7cm European Beech with low branches, upright Yew clipped, Spirea 10 Ash 15.5 G Narrow branch angles with included bark, immediately adjacent building 11 Garden F Ornamental Pear multi -stemmed at base with fused branches, narrow branch angles with included bark, ornamental grass, thistle, vetch, weeds 12 Garden FG 4 ornamental Pears multi -stemmed at base with fused branches, narrow branch angles with included bark, Sedum at base, Red -Osier Dogwood hedge behind fence. Approximately 8 Butternut seedlings 0.3m height. 13 Norway Maple 26.5 G Adventitious shoots at base, narrow branch angles `Crimson King' with included bark, tip dieback, leaf scorch, tar spot Newcastle Streetscape Tree Inventory.Docx A=COM Tree Species Size Cond. Comments No. Page 3 Tree Inventory and Assessment King St W, Newcastle October 2013 14 Honeylocust 27 G Multiple branches from same point of attachment, decay at pruning wounds 15 Norway Maple 42.5 FG Girdling roots, trunk twisted, decay on scaffold `Crimson King' branch, decay on numerous lateral branches, decay at pruning wounds, small dead branches, no leader, multiple branches from same point of attachment, canopy extends around hydro pole and over sidewalk at 4m height, guy wire extends through canopy, leaf scorch, tar spot 16 Honeylocust 27.5 G Multiple branches from same point of attachment, decay at pruning wounds 17 Norway Maple 44.5 FG Girdling roots, trunk twisted, multiple branches from `Crimson King' same point of attachment, decay at pruning wounds, narrow branch angles with included bark, decay on scaffold and lateral branches, lateral branch fused to trunk, minor dieback, tar spot, leaf scorch, canopy extends over sidewalk at 5m height 18 Honeylocust 21 FG Sunken areas on trunk, multiple branches from same point of attachment, small area of decay at base of trunk 19 Sugar Maple 78 F Small areas of decay at base, decay at pruning wounds, one-sided canopy, majority of growth adventitious branches, canopy suppressed by Tree No. 20 20 Red Maple 77 FG Root burl with decay, codominant leaders with included bark, ribs extend down trunk from codominant leader branch union to base on two sides, canopy extends through canopy of Tree No. 19, decay at pruning wounds 21 Silver Maple 97 FG Decay at pruning wounds, one-sided canopy, few adventitious shoots at pruning wounds, dieback 22 Manitoba Maple 56 F Former trunk stub at base with fruiting bodies, tree leans over bus shelter and light post, canopy extends over sidewalk at 4m height to curb, adventitious shoots, narrow branch angles with included bark, adventitious branches 23 Hybrid Maple 9.5 G 24 Hybrid Maple 10 G 25 Manitoba Maple 48 P Girdling roots, trunk twisted, tree lean, decay at base of trunk, codominant leaders with fruiting bodies, large dead branch stub, dieback, numerous keys present 26 Norway Spruce 49 G Lower branches pruned, branch crossing trunk, fused branches, canopy extends over sidewalk at 5m height 27 Hybrid Maple 116.5 G Decay at pruning wounds, few adventitious shoots branches, small dead branches Newcastle Streetscape Tree Inventory. Docx A=COM Tree Species Size Cond. Comments No. Page 4 Tree Inventory and Assessment King St W, Newcastle October 2013 28 Red Maple 103 FG Narrow growth habit, narrow branch angles with included bark, dead branches suspended in canopy, small dead branches, decay at pruning wounds, decay on root burl 29 Norway Maple 32 FG Trunk lean, tree suppressed by Tree No. 27, one- sided canopy, decay at pruning wounds, narrow branch angles, girdling roots, no root flare, dieback, small dead branches, tar spot 30 Norway Maple 42 FG Exposed roots with decay, girdling roots, decay at pruning wounds, one-sided canopy, suppressed by Tree No. 28, tar spot, canopy extends over sidewalk at 6m height 31 Norway Maple --65 FG Immediately adjacent fence with root flare extending under fence, sunken areas under scaffold branches, minor dieback, multiple branches from same point of attachment, decay at pruning wounds, numerous dead branches, tar spot, trunk lean, canopy extends over sidewalk at 8m height 32 Norway Spruce --60 FG Lower branches pruned, small dead branches, canopy suppressed on one side by Tree No. 31 33 Norway Maple --35 FG Dieback, small dead branches, lower canopy one - `Crimson King' sided, tar spot; White Birch located behind --30cm in fair condition with one-sided canopy and dieback 34 Flowering 24.5 & 42 G Multiple branches from same point of attachment at Crabapple 1 m height, smaller trunk dead, adventitious shoots at base, along trunk and branches, dead branches, larger trunk splits to 3 codominant leaders 35 Linden 39.5 G Numerous adventitious shoots pruned at base, decay at pruning wounds, narrow branch angles with included bark, multiple branches from same point of attachment, canopy extends over street at 2m height, growing in 1.5m x 2m tree pit 36 Linden 12 FP Extremely stunted, numerous adventitious shoots pruned at base and along trunk, numerous burls on trunk, narrow branch angles with included bark, multiple branches from same point of attachment, canopy one-sided 37 Linden 50 G Girdling roots, exposed roots with decay, large wound with decay on lower scaffold branch, canopy extends'/2 way across the street at 10m height, narrow branch angles, decay at pruning wounds, multiple branches from same point of attachment 38 Norway Maple 6.5 F Dieback, small dead branches, tar spot, growing in `Crimson King' 1m x 1m tree pit 39 Linden 35.5 F Area of decay on trunk, asymmetric trunk cross- section, narrow branch angles with included bark, decay at pruning wounds, small dead branches, canopy extends over street at 8m height, growing in 1 m x 1 m tree pit 40 Honeylocust 5 FG Decay on trunk, tip dieback, adventitious shoots, growing in 1 m x 1 m tree pit Newcastle Streetscape Tree Inventory.Docx A=COM Tree Species Size Cond. Comments No. Page 5 Tree Inventory and Assessment King St W, Newcastle October 2013 41 Honeylocust 5 FGF Adventitious shoots, narrow branch angles, tip dieback, no leaves present, growing in 1m x 1m tree pit 42 Honeylocust 5.5 FG Fused branches, tip dieback, small dead branches, growing in 1m x 1m tree pit 43 Silver Maple 128.5 G Clusters of adventitious shoots along trunk, 4 main trunks at 5m height, adventitious shoots pruned from base, fused branches, decay at pruning wounds, canopy extends over '/z street at 15m height, perennial garden at base 44 Ash 73 F Trunk lean, codominant leaders, small trunk fused to codominant leaders, adventitious branches, small dead branches, decay at pruning wounds, no leaves present 45 Norway Maple 41.5 G Girdling roots, trunk twisted, exposed roots with `Crimson King' decay, multiple branches from same point of attachment, narrow branch angles, slight tip dieback, tar spot, growing in 1m x 1.5m tree pit 46 Norway Maple 17.5 G Girdling roots, decay at pruning wounds, adventitious shoots at pruning wounds, narrow branch angles with included bark, multiple branches from same point of attachment, leaf scorch, tar spot, growing in 1m x 1.5m tree pit 47 Norway Maple 16 FG Codominant leaders with included bark, multiple branches from same point of attachment, decay on lateral branches, canopy slightly one-sided, leaf scorch, tar spot, sign twist tied to trunk from base to 2m height, growing in 1m x 1.5m tree pit 48 Norway Maple 19 G Girdling roots, exposed roots with decay, multiple branches from same point of attachment, narrow branch angles with included bark, adventitious shoots, growing in 1m x 1m tree pit 49 Norway Maple 14.5 G Girdling roots, narrow form, tip dieback, multiple branches from same point of attachment, tar spot, growing in 1m x 1m tree pit 50 Norway Maple 25 FG Girdling roots, decay on trunk, exposed girdling roots with decay, decay at pruning wounds, multiple branches from same point of attachment, leaf scorch, tar spot, numerous keys present, growing in 1m x 1m tree pit 51 Honeylocust 8 G Small dead branches, trunk lean, "O" pipe at base 52 Ash 20 D 53 Sugar Maple 25.5 FG Large bulge on trunk with sunken area below — former staking injury, narrow branch angles with included bark 54 Sugar Maple 25 G Minor dieback, rib on trunk, narrow branch angles Newcastle Streetscape Tree Inventory. Docx A=COM Tree Species Size Cond. Comments No. Page 6 Tree Inventory and Assessment King St W, Newcastle October 2013 55 Manitoba Maple 63.5 FP Trunk lean, decay at pruning wounds, adventitious shoots along trunk and branches, dead branch, fruiting bodies on trunk, majority of canopy adventitious shoots, canopy extends over sidewalk at 2m height 56 Catalpa 70.5 F Burl on trunk with sap exuding, decay at pruning wounds, broken branch stub with decay, dead branches, multiple branches from same point of attachment, small dead branches 57 White Birch --20 G 2 White Birch located behind in line, clipped Juniper at base 58 Norway Maple 50 F Girdling roots, decay on trunk near top of canopy, `Crimson King' dieback, multiple branches from same point of attachment, sunken area on trunk, narrow branch angles with included bark, decay at pruning wounds, asymmetric trunk cross-section, small dead branches, tar spot, overhead wires extend through canopy, canopy extends over sidewalk at 2m height 59 Colorado Spruce 30 FG Lower branches pruned to 2m height, recent pruning wounds with pitch, canopy extends to overhead wires, canopy slightly sparse 60 White Cedar GE 3m height hedge 61 Colorado Blue --30 FG Narrow form, small dead branches, sparse Spruce branching on one side, broken branch 62 Colorado Blue --60 FG Columnar, small dead branches, Virginia Creeper Spruce growing in canopy, 4 Colorado Blue Spruce adjacent --15cm Discussion There are many social, economic, and environmental benefits associated with trees in a community, including aesthetics, increased property value, improved air quality, and food and shelter for birds and other wildlife. The trees along the street contribute significantly to the character of this area, and it is important to minimize damage to existing trees. Biotic and Abiotic Disorders Many biotic and abiotic disorders and structural defects are listed in the notes section of the tree inventory table. Structural defects are often harmless when a tree is young, but can pose a problem when a tree grows larger and the weight of branches puts added stress on defects that cause weakness. Also, the branches of larger trees have the potential to cause more damage should they fail. Residential areas have many potential targets (people and property) should a tree or branch fail, and therefore ongoing maintenance and monitoring are important to minimize hazards. Following is an explanation of some of the problems outlined in the Comments section of the above table and how they can affect trees over time. Newcastle Streetscape Tree Inventory.Docx A=COM Page 7 Tree Inventory and Assessment King St W, Newcastle October 2013 Girdling roots are roots that are crossing over each other or around the trunk of the tree. As the roots grow larger, they can restrict the uptake of water and nutrients. Norway maple trees are particularly prone to girdling roots. Exposed surface roots are often a result of erosion and soil compaction combined with increase root diameter. Exposed roots need protection from pedestrian and vehicular traffic including lawn mowers. Damage or cutting of these roots can cause long term stress and damage to the tree. Included bark is bark that has become embedded in a crotch between limbs, weakening the attachment of the branches. Narrow branch angles, especially when there is included bark, can be a problem when the tree grows larger because there is poor attachment of inner wood. As the trunk and branch increase in girth, the bark of the trunk and branch in the tight crotch begins to push apart and can eventually cause failure of the branch. This situation is worse when the narrow angle is between co -dominant leaders (branches of approximately the same size), or when there are multiple branches from same point of attachment. Strong branch attachments occur between 2 limbs of unequal size with enough space for branch enlargement and formation of the branch bark ridge. Crossing branches can eventually girdle each other, and usually have narrow attachment angles. Cankers and wounds on the trunk usually cause decay and reduce the strength of the wood. The severity of the defect depends on the extent and location of decay and the presence of other defects (for example trunk decay is more serious if the tree leans). If there is a reasonable thickness of wood for a significant portion of the circumference of the trunk, decay can be present with very little weakening of the trunk or branch. Sunken areas under scaffold branches and asymmetrical trunk cross-section can be indications of internal decay. Adventitious shoots emerge from dormant buds along the trunk or branch of a tree and this growth pattern usually arises as a result of an injury or pruning. Adventitious shoots can be indicative of stress as they act as a tree's means of compensating for loss of canopy cover due to an environmental stimulus. Tar spot is a common fungal disease of Norway maples. The fungus causes round to irregular black, tar -like spots on infected leaves. Fungi survive on fallen diseased leaves between seasons. Tar spot is seldom injurious to the tree as symptoms develop late in the season. Removing and destroying fallen leaves can help to reduce the amount of overwintering fungi. Past failures are important to note, because trees that have failed in the past tend to continue to fail. Fundamentals of Tree Growth and Survival In order to reduce the risk of damaging trees and better preserve existing trees, the following fundamentals of tree growth and survival must be considered: • Tree roots are vital for tree survival and stability Newcastle Streetscape Tree Inventory.Docx A=COM Page 8 Tree Inventory and Assessment King St W, Newcastle October 2013 o The most typical construction damage to trees is root damage through compaction and severance. o Fine roots are entirely responsible for water and nutrient uptake. The feeder roots of a mature tree can typically grow out from the trunk up to 3 times the height of the tree. Roots tend not to grow in compacted soil where there is little air space, such as under sidewalks and roads. Most roots are found in the upper 30cm of soil. o Diminished root function can lead to death of branches or of the entire tree and these symptoms can take several years to become evident. o Roots are easily damaged by soil compaction and changes in grade. Especially with large trees, grade changes and construction activities that will cause soil compaction should be kept as far away as possible from trees to avoid root damage which could compromise health as well as structural stability. The critical structural root zone extends directly from the trunk o If roots must be cut and it is questionable whether they are providing stability to the tree, an arborist should be on site to assess potential damage and make recommendations. Water and nutrients are conducted in the tissue just under the bark. Broken branches and torn bark allow pathways for insects and decay. Damage to leaves and overall canopy reduces the capacity for photosynthesis and limits availability of required energy. Recommendations Root Damage Root damage can be minimized by restricting equipment in the vicinity of the existing trees, and limiting equipment and materials storage area within the ROW. It is critical to avoid damage to the structural root plate in order to prevent impacting tree stability and creating a hazard. In general, roots 100mm in diameter or larger should be considered to be structural roots. If there is any question about whether a tree's stability may be affected, an ISA Certified Arborist should be consulted. It is unlikely that there is a significant quantity of roots present under sidewalks or the road, and it is anticipated that root damage to trees will be minimal. Pruning Roots Root pruning should occur prior to the start of construction to prevent desiccation of roots, increase root regeneration and minimize damage to root systems during construction. Roots should be pruned 15 to 30 cm back from the edge of the Tree Protection Zone and to a depth of 1 metre or the maximum depth of root penetration (whichever is deeper). Pruning roots within the TPZ provides an area of minimally disturbed soil, allowing for new root growth. All pruning should be done with approved root -pruning equipment and under the supervision of a certified arborist. Any roots that are severed during construction should be cut cleanly to minimize decay and entry points for disease. If roots will be exposed for more than a few hours, they should be protected from drying. Newcastle Streetscape Tree Inventory.Docx A=COM Branches Page 9 Tree Inventory and Assessment King St W, Newcastle October 2013 Where branches are likely to be damaged during construction, it is better to prune prior to construction to avoid branches being broken off, so that bark is not torn and wounds are not more extensive than absolutely necessary. Pruning should be done in accordance with ANSI A300 (Part 1) — Pruning (2008). Limbs that may interfere with construction should be pruned under the supervision of the contract administrator prior to construction. Tree Protection and Construction Management Construction restrictions and maintenance practices such as the following should be considered during development of the contract specifications: • Where work will take place near trees, tree protection fencing shall be erected and maintained to protect the tree and root zone. Tree protection fencing requirements should be illustrated in construction drawings and should be in place and approved by the consultant prior to any construction activity on site. • No activity shall be allowed within the tree protection fence area. Equipment shall not be driven over root zones, no materials shall be stockpiled near trees, and foot traffic shall be limited especially during rainy periods when soil is more prone to compaction. • If roots are severed, they shall be cut cleanly with sharp pruning tools. • Exposed roots shall be protected from drying. CERTIFICATION certify that all the statements of fact in this assessment are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that they are made in good faith. Jes Harnden, ISA Certified Arborist REFERENCES Authored by Representatives to Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers, 2000. Guide for Plant Appraisal 9th Edition, International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois. Farrar, John Laird. 1995. Trees In Canada. Canadian Forest Service, Markham, ON Hayes, E. 2000. Evaluating Trees For Defects. Safetrees.com, Rochester, MN. Lilly, Sharon J. 2001. Arborists' Certification Study Guide. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois. Matheny, N.P., and J.R. Clark. 1994. A Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois. Matheny, N.P., and J.R. Clark. 1998. Trees and Development: A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land Development. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois. Newcastle Streetscape Tree Inventory.Docx CWANL Partners in exoellence AMENDMENT TO TREE INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT REPORT PREPARED BY AECOM, OCTOBER 18, 2013 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON KING AVENUE AND MILL STREET, VILLAGE OF NEWCASTLE Lisa Cullen, ISA Certified Arborist ON-0741A, visited the site on May 12, 2014 to provide an assessment of trees within the study area that were not included in the original Tree Assessment prepared by All Trees 63-68 have been added to the assessment, as follows. Tree No. Soecies Size Cond. Comments 63 Norway Maple 51 FIG Girdling roots, decay at former codominant trunk, cavity in trunk, adventitious shoots 64 Norway Maple 38 FP Girdling roots, decay in surface roots. Column of decay through top, leader dead and pruned. Adventitious shoots 65 Norway Maple 43 FIG Girdling roots, area of decay on trunk, narrow branch angles with included bark, codominant leaders, decay at pruning wounds, adventitious shoots 66 Norway Maple 38 F Girdling roots, column of decay in trunk, ribs and seams along trunk and scaffold branches, crossing branches, adventitious shoots, small dead branches 67 Norway Maple 8 G Adventitious shoots 68 1Ornamental Pear 5.25 G The location of these trees is shown on Drawing No. TI-4, which has been added to AECOM's Tree Inventory Drawings. May12_14 Tree InventoryAmendment.docx 1 of 1 ClMA+ �� Partners in excellence E E (1ggA) pvG M � 400Mrt` DLS 0 CONC S/W ROGE 5 UG I I I I I I I I I I ODLS CONG S/W OLs ODLS 42 41 200mm COLIC SAN (1974) KING AVENUE WEST 200mm AC WM (1961) 0 46 0 RocERs u I PARKING 'LOT I I I I l- REFER TO DRAWING LA-4 SITE KtN� P d I s DG o D OLS DLSO 40MAP LEGEND Z 0 Existing Tree o (refer to Tree Report) (If 2 W W OLS CD DLs HYO W owrv, TMe ac 1—can 0—oaass meo Xsvec�ncauE OEsca eeT o roe a EsncE [aeon is To se useo asaaeseae U No. DATE I By ISSUES/REVISIONS U II A=COM AECOM Canada Ltd. 513 Division Street, Cobourg, Ontario, Canada K9A 5G6 T905.372.2121 F905.372.3621 This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental wing agencies. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, 0 any party that modifies this drawing without AECOM's express wriflan --t. Do not scale this document. All measurements must be obtained from gated dimension.. CLIENT: N H z CjlayinZLeadingWay 0 E- PROJECT: X W LU STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN ST. TO ARTHUR ST. NEWCASTLE, ONTARIO W DRAWING: KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN ST. TO 80m EAST OF MILL ST. a TREEINVENTORY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 60308123 DESIGNED BY APPROVED BY T I 1 SCALE: DATE: OCT. 21 2013 SO CSW ASPH.PARKING Z ry 0 Lu w W RKING DLS CSN ~ I IO I vJ 3 HY a I w E 3 1= E E ASPH. oN IOHH �>tame ter_ 21 20 00 19 24 23 26 25 n22 / US - O — — — — — m — — < SHELTER � Ls z a O H Lu w W W 200mm AC WM (1961) W rOGERS UG HYD - 55 56 Q I I I 34 33 - 1 - 375mm ,ONC SAN (1974) DLS ni 400mm DI WM (1980) I I C r WM ROGERS OH - 32 I 28 �27 30, 29 \ - - - - - - - - -/ L DLS KING -A UE EAST ROGERS UG Z ID m m I A ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH 16 14 )L7 15 HLPC2AMH2 KING ING^^ A VENUE /E� A ST r HP 05 STATE FARM 57 INSURANCE I I I I I [25 I M H z z ❑ 0 w w W z J KEY MAP LEGEND �1 Existing Tree (I 1 (refer to Tree Report) No 'o oa nssuui0 HEIREONi IS TORE USED o REFERENCE ecavnriorynnvauaaose. v[.'�m�ra����FY,YrIt-91:ia1F9[ ]gbh A=COM AECOM Canada Ltd. 513 Division Street, Cobourg, Ontario, Canada K9A 5G6 T905.372.2121 F905.372.3621 This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client and may not - be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM and its client, as required by law or for use by govemmerdel r wing agencies. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any I.whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without AECOM's express written wnsent. p Do not scale this dowment. All measurements must be obtained from 8{( stated dimensions. CLIENT: amon Leading the way gw y PROJECT: e STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO KING AVENUE FROM 3ALDWIN ST. TO ARTHUR ST. NEWCASTLE, ONTARIO DRAWING: KING AVENUE FROM 80m EAST OF MILL ST. TO 240m EAST OF MILL STREET. TREEINVENTORY DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT No.: 60308123 DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY: DRAWING No. u- SCALE DATE: T I 2 ■ 1:No OCT. 212013 0 F— LU 0 0 z 0 LU LU J- LU X w 0 ESSO N 0 I FLAT IRONS M i rHAIRSMLON =EN 9 Po II 300— AC S4N (1974) J7 6 5 GP(2_ 7Z P(� — — — — — — — — — — KING AVENUE EA S T RCIERS 01 5� 9 i -1 Li-f I 6\1 162 .315 r327 VENUE EAST Existing Tree (refer to Tree Report) ITIIT"IIIIIINIIIIIIIIIT"EIIITIITIIITI 1111IT"E"IEL"" 'E E11T n N. 1-1, T I A111111 IAINI 11 11ARAIT111 11LE E11EIT 1111 TIE 11- 1—IdEa.-E.P.-Ha LU ELE_ _._A'En -EON 1$ TO BE USED As A REFERENCE z L) N.. DATE BY ISSUES/REVISIONS AOcom AECOM Canada Ltd. 513 Division Street, Cobourg, Ontario, Canada K9A 5G6 T905.372.2121 F905 372 3621 This drawing he, been prepared for the u,, at AECOM', di- and may not be Used, reproduced or relied up, by third! parlias, except as agreed by AEGOM and it, client, as required bylaw orfor use by governmental wing agencies. AECOM accepts responsibility, r, and dares any liability whalwever, t, any p,ly that modifies this drawing without AECOM', express wren consent. D, not scale this d,w,,,t. All mvaeuramarts must be obtained from stated dimensions. CLIENT Clan' n PROJECT STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO KING AVENUE FROM 3ALDWIN ST. TO ARTHUR ST.' NEWCASTLE, ONTARIO DRAWING: KING AVENUE 240 m EAST OF MILL ST. TO 80m EAST OF ARTHUR ST. TREEINVENTORY DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY PROJECT N.. 60308123 DESIGNED BY: APPROVED BY: DRAWING No. SCALE: 1 DATE: TI-31 No OCT. 212013 WF 0 C1) co a� zry, �0 o� 0 W �Lu W Lu W Of LL 0 W CL' J Q z J U H Q MILL S TREE © © c©cPb oftoome dd t ,at MILL S TREE T M/S DN00 C — -- — —— xSITE N�&ON 0 0] j Ur Q (600Z) INM OAd ' 00z C < 0 0LL ~ W Luo �c Lu J W o Z W Q LEGEND \I,1 2C Existing Tree (refer to Tree Report) 2 Cla of uC � Leading the Way STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS TO KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN ST. TO ARTHUR ST. NEWCASTLE ONTARIO No, I D— Desttipt— 6y MILL STREET 100m NORTH OF KING AVENUE TO EMILY STREET TREE INVENTORY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE .:1 soo eea. xC14-0002 xCSS.KINGAVE.1 r.Ex_ L MAY ixEx. wixx xo. o Ex o Ex TI-4 L LLEN E_ MAY 2014 nxe_ 04 0! 04 i1i teering Committee Meeting Minutes Minutes of Meeting Date of Meeting October 30, 2013 start Time 6:30pm Project Number 60308123 Project Name Newcastle Streetscape Development Guidelines and Plan Location Newcastle Recreation Complex, 1780 Rudell Rd. Regarding Project Initiation and Visioning Session Greg Lewis (GL), Newcastle BIA Theresa Vanhaverbeke (TV), Syvan Developments Myno Van Dyke (MVD), Newcastle CIP Committee Gabrielle Bell (GB), Newcastle CIP Committee Councillor Willy Woo (WW) Dave Eastman (DE), Newcastle Ratepayers Association Lynda Motchenbacher (LM), Region of Durham Ruth Porras (RP), Municipality of Clarington Planning Department Ron Albright (RA), Municipality of Clarington, Engineering Department Attendees Sara Taylor (ST), AECOM Distribution Attendees Minutes Prepared By Sara Taylor, AECOM PLEASE NOTE: If this report does not agree with your records of the meeting, or if there are any omissions, please advise, otherwise we will assume the contents to be correct. • Project objective: is to develop streetscape guidelines and preliminary plan Info which will be attainable over the next few budget years • Limits of this streetscape study: will be King Avenue from North St./ Baldwin Info St. to Arthur St./ Brookhouse Dr. and will include Mill St. south to Emily St. and north to the 50 Mill St. property • Existing Infrastructure Conditions/ Issues, etc: Info ■ In terms of infrastructure responsibilities all roads, curbs, etc. fall under Region of Durham jurisdiction, and sidewalks, boulevards and street lighting fall under Municipality of Clarington jurisdiction ■ Existing lighting is a combined system of decorative coach -style lighting supplemented by cobra -head fixtures ■ Need to confirm that electrical servicing for King St. properties comes from rear of buildings • Existing Issues/ Opportunities/ Challenges: ■ BIA area includes King Ave. from North St. to the Tim Horton's plaza at Info Arthur St. ■ Area is made up of 2 different districts which should be reflected in the streetscape plan/ guidelines ■ In terms of traffic safety there are visibility issues pulling out from No Frills parking lot ■ Agricultural equipment that travels through study area needs to be considered/ accommodated in streetscape plan ■ CIP does not approve of the use of bollards ■ King Ave. west from Mill St. is part of the Lakefront Trail cycling route; Region is currently developing Cycling Master Plan • Input to Guide Streetscape Vision: Info ■ Streetscape plan should reflect 2 different districts and provide some unifying elements and some unique/ varying elements ■ Opportunity at Atkinson Park for special feature/ element — this area is the division between the 2 districts ■ Streetscape character/ theme should reflect/ incorporate 1850's historical period as well as agricultural heritage (Massey connection) • Streetscape Elements: Info/ AECOM ■ Lighting o consensus to remove cobra -head fixtures and replace with more decorative fixtures; provide a unified lighting system throughout study limits o consider providing lower height fixtures with greater frequency in west/ historical area and fixtures with higher mounting height/ less frequency in East district o consider opportunities to customize scroll arms on lighting fixtures o light poles need to accommodate hanging baskets, banners and lit Christmas wreaths provided by BIA o Investigate funding opportunities for replacing existing lighting with high efficiency/ LED lighting ■ Traffic Calming o Traffic calming measures/ bump -outs would be beneficial at North St. and Beaver St. locations o North St. location would need to take into consideration Regions' future intersection signalization plans; also confirm no conflicts with GO Transit o Investigate opportunity to do one-sided (East of North St.) bump - out ■ Parking o Do not want to lose any on -street parking o Rear lane should extend from LCBO to municipal parking lot o Opportunity for pedestrian/outdoor restaurant/ seating space b/w the Snug and convenience store if rear lane access provided to King St. properties ■ Paving o Consider using words/ street names in paving o Paving should complement existing buildings as well as new paving installation at Town Hall o Images of paving options to consider to be distributed to AECOM Committee members ■ Gateway Signage o Consensus to provide similar gateway signage feature to existing sign at Shoppers parking lot at the east and west entrances on King Ave. o Include a space to market the community/ advertise a community event (i.e. temporary signage board that can be hooked on) o Signage in Lindsay (Angeline St.) a good example; Myno to MVD forward picture o New fire hall building would be good location for gateway signage o Priorities would be to provide signage first at west end of King Ave., then East end of King Ave., then north end of study area on Mill St. o BIA wants to provide banners that cross the street esp. at entrances to downtown area (i.e. between Given Rd. and Baldwin St.); this would need to go through Region's Traffic Department permitting process ■ Street Trees and Planting o Investigate costs of using soil cell systems o Consider use of rubberized mulch installed near Town Hall/ Cenotaph o Committee would like to promote use of maples; many of mature maples on Mill St. have died o Consider visibility of signage, etc. when recommending tree locations/ species o Maintenance of planters would be BIA responsibility ■ Accessibility o Can introduce slight changes in grade to promote accessibility where opportunities/ conditions allow o Municipality of Clarington would like to update existing curb detail to remove lip/ promote accessibility ■ Street Furniture o Take into consideration recently installed furniture at Town Hall, No Frills and Shoppers o Consider divided trash receptacles to include recycling o Avoid "feet" on trash receptacles which rust away • Other: TV advised of a streetscape study prepared last year by Sir Sanford RA Fleming students which should be considered as part of this streetscape study process. RA to obtain copy and forward to AECOM. • Next Steps: Info ■ AECOM to proceed with preparation of draft plan and streetscape palette ■ 1 additional Steering Committee meeting prior to PIC (potentially first week of December) Minutes of Meeting Date of Meeting February 3, 2014 start Time 7:00pm Project Number 60308123 Project Name Newcastle Streetscape Development Guidelines and Plan Location Newcastle Recreation Complex, 1780 Rudell Rd. Regarding Preliminary Design Review Greg Lewis (GL), Newcastle BIA Theresa Vanhaverbeke (TV), Syvan Developments Councillor Willy Woo (WW) Dave Eastman (DE), Newcastle Ratepayers Association Ruth Porras (RP), Municipality of Clarington Planning Department Ron Albright (RA), Municipality of Clarington, Engineering Department Attendees Lisa Cullen (LC), CIMA+ Attendees Myno Van Dyke (MVD), Newcastle CIP Committee Gabrielle Bell (GB), Newcastle CIP Committee Distribution Lynda Motchenbacher (LM), Region of Durham Minutes Prepared By Lisa Cullen, CIMA+ PLEASE NOTE: If this report does not agree with your records of the meeting, or if there are any omissions, please advise, otherwise we will assume the contents to be correct. Elements of the proposed streetscape were discussed, summarized as follows: General Southeast corner of King and Mill by Shoppers Drug Mart — concern Info ■ expressed about people stopping too close to the corner and blocking the accessible stall — rear entrance suggested for Shoppers Drug Mart Bumpouts ■ Planter height in bumpout areas should be as tall as possible to maximize AECOM visibility to drivers; maximum height (including plants) will be 0.75m due to sight line requirements ■ A warning marker is needed at the lead edge of the bump -out curbs to AECOM mark the change in curb alignment for drivers, snowploughs, etc. 60308123_Newcastle Streetscape Meeting Minutes_Feb3_14.Docx Lighting ■ Keep the option for hanging baskets on all decorative poles throughout the project area AECOM ■ Ensure that the proposed fixture is dark sky compliant — Update: the Info Shallow Lens fixture proposed has "cutoff" classification, which means up to 2.5% of luminous flux is allowed above 90 degrees. For comparison, the flat and sag versions of the same fixture are "full cutoff", meaning zero uplight above 90 degrees. The literature for these fixtures references Dark Sky Friendly, but a full cutoff fixture may be necessary to be considered Dark Sky Compliant. Trees: ■ Rubberized mulch to be used in tree pits, to match trees at Town Hall AECOM ■ Include soil cell installation to increase soil volume available in hard surface areas; due to cost this may be a Provisional Item when the project Info is tendered. AECOM ■ Ensure species diversity; change some Honeylocust for another species — it was noted that Honeylocust are good for visibility of business signs because of small leaflets, and they tend to do best in hard surface conditions with very little root space. However, we are hoping to use soil cells to increase soil volume available. Tree species will be finalized during detailed design. ■ Theresa noted the importance of the Sugar Maple to Newcastle and would like to see these trees added where possible, if possible Info 60308123_Newcastle Streetscape Meeting Minutes_Feb3_14.Docx Paving, Furniture, and Street Signage: ■ The benches proposed match those at Town Hall Info ■ Paver colours proposed are Sante Fe (to match existing pavers at Town Info Hall) and Heritage Brown ■ Planters proposed are fibreglass rectangular by Plastiglas, Granite colour, AECOM aggregate finish (sample chip of polished aggregate finish was shown at the meeting; exposed aggregate sample will be obtained prior to the PIC) ■ The group liked photos shown of granite street markers in concrete sidewalk installed in the Old Bowmanville Neighbourhood. Street markers Info should have heritage script. ■ Custom street signage in the downtown area could include Newcastle Info town hall logo, heritage look suggested with white lettering on green signs. It was noted that the lettering should be large enough to be easily legible. ■ Theresa said she should be able to supply a sample of the graphic. She TV will see what she has and forward to the committee. ■ Theresa noted that the BIA is interested in an overhead banner to RA advertise events — BIA had suggested west of Baldwin Street, which would require Region approval and permitting (Ron can discuss logistics with a contact at the Region). Theresa noted that sponsorship may be available through Veridian Connections. The banner will be proposed in the downtown section for discussion at the PIC. Gateways: ■ Proposed east and west gateway locations shown in visualizations were RA/AECOM well received by the group; Theresa suggested that the information be sent to Myno for review and comment ■ Gateway signs should have uplighting similar to the existing sign at AECOM Mill/Emily. ■ Replacement of the existing green sign on North Street (RR17) close to Info Concession Road 3 (similar to the east gateway) was suggested. Ron noted that North Street will be realigned and gateway signage should be part of the Environmental Assessment for that project. 60308123_Newcastle Streetscape Meeting Minutes_Feb3_14.Docx PIC: ■ Include a visualization of the east end of the project site, showing a AECOM proposed planter ■ Bumpout to be added at the west side of Church Street on both sides of AECOM King Street. This will also be the location where an overhead banner will be proposed. ■ PIC has been scheduled on Wednesday, February 19, from 7:00 to 9:00 Info p.m. at the Newcastle Aquatic Centre Boardroom. ■ Signage will be placed in the entrance area directing people to the Boardroom in order to attract walk-in traffic from people who are at the AECOM Recreation Complex for other events. 60308123_Newcastle Streetscape Meeting Minutes_Feb3_14.Docx Public Information Centre Comment Sheets NEWCASTLE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN STREET TO ARTHUR STREET MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON a r'' Public Information Centre Leading �(�111 Wednesday, February 7 19 2014 the Way 7 COMMENT SHEET We would appreciate receiving your comments before February 28, 2014. Please submit comment sheets to: Mr. Ron Albright, P. Eng. Inquire Directly at: Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Works Tel.: 905.623.3379 (ext. 2305) Municipality of Clarington Fax: 905.623.9282 40 Temperance Street Email: RAlbright@clarington.net Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 Privacy Legislation Federal legislation governs the collection and use of personal information from individuals. By supplying your name, address, telephone number and/or e-mail address, YOU ARE CONSENTING TO the collection and use by AECOM of that personal information for the following purposes: recording and reporting to AECOM's client your attendance at this public meeting; attributing to you statements made by you at this meeting in any report that AECOM prepares regarding this project; contacting you to provide updates regarding the project, if requested by you; contacting you to request further comments or discussion of the project, should AECOM or the client deem this necessary or advisable. If you wish to limit the way that AECOM may use your personal information, as described above, you must advise AECOM in writing within five business days of this meeting. NEWCASTLE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN STREET TO ARTHUR STREET MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ClPublic Information Centre Leading gtthe Way �11 Wednesday, February 19, 2014 COMMENT SHEET NAME: (Please print clearly) CONTACT STREET: INFORMATION: CITY: POSTAL CODE: PHONE: EMAIL: COMMENTS: Please attach additional sheets or other materials as necessary / appropriate. We would appreciate receiving your comments before February 28, 2014. Please submit comment sheets to: Mr. Ron Albright, P. Eng. Inquire Directly at: Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Works Tel.: 905.623.3379 (ext. 2305) Municipality of Clarington Fax: 905.623.9282 40 Temperance Street Email: RAlbright@clarington.net Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 Privacy Legislation Federal legislation governs the collection and use of personal information from individuals. By supplying your name, address, telephone number and/or e-mail address, YOU ARE CONSENTING TO the collection and use by AECOM of that personal information for the following purposes: recording and reporting to AECOM's client your attendance at this public meeting; attributing to you statements made by you at this meeting in any report that AECOM prepares regarding this project; contacting you to provide updates regarding the project, if requested by you; contacting you to request further comments or discussion of the project, should AECOM or the client deem this necessary or advisable. If you wish to limit the way that AECOM may use your personal information, as described above, you must advise AECOM in writing within five business days of this meeting. NEWCASTLE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN STREET TO ARTHUR STREET MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON (AeaPublic Information Centre dingrhe■Way■ Wednesday, February 19, 2014 COMMENT SHEET NAME: (Please pcarWy���� CONTACT STREET: INFORMATION: CITY: POSTAL CODE: PHONE: EMAIL: COMMENTS: bump LDS lo�S P �ess 00 .k^ /O, Trill s Please attach additional sheets or other materials as necessary/ appropriate. We would appreciate receiving your comments before February 28, 2014. Please submit comment sheets to: Mr. Ron Albright, P. Eng. Inquire Directly at: Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Works Tel.: 905.623.3379 (ext. 2305) Municipality of Clarington Fax: 905.623.9282 40 Temperance Street Email: RAlbright@clarington.net Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 Privacy Legislation Federal legislation governs the collection and use of personal information from individuals. By supplying your name, address, telephone number and/or e-mail address, YOU ARE CONSENTING TO the collection and use by AECOM of that personal information for the Following purposes: recording and reporting to AECOM's client your attendance at this public meeting; attributing to you statements made by you at this meeting in any report that AECOM prepares regarding this project; contacting you to provide updates regarding the project, if requested by you; contacting you to request further comments or discussion of the project, should AECOM or the client deem this necessary or advisable. If you wish to limit the way that AECOM may use your personal information, as described above, you must advise AECOM in writing within five business days of this meeting. NEWCASTLE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN STREET TO ARTHUR STREET MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Public Information Centre /,eadingYhe Wav� Wednesday, February 19, 2014 COMMENT SHEET NAME: (Please print clearly) CONTACT STREET: INFORMATION: CIT POSTAL CODE: PHONE: EMAIL: Please attach additional sheets or other materials as necessary / appropriate. We would appreciate receiving your comments before February 28, 2014. Please submit comment sheets to: Mr. Ron Albright, P. Eng. Inquire Directly at: Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Works Tel.: 905.623.3379 (ext. 2305) Municipality of Clarington Fax: 905.623.9282 40 Temperance Street Email: RAlbright@clarington.net Bowmanville, ON 1_1 C 3A6 Privacy Legislation Federal legislation governs the collection and use of personal information from individuals. By supplying your name, address, telephone number and/or e-mail address, YOU ARE CONSENTING TO the collection and use by AECOM of that personal information for the following purposes: recording and reporting to AECOM's client your attendance at this public meeting; attributing to you statements made by you at this meeting in any report that AECOM prepares regarding this project; contacting you to provide updates regarding the project, if requested by you; contacting you to request further comments or discussion of the project, should AECOM or the client deem this necessary or advisable. If you wish to limit the way that AECOM may use your personal information, as described above, you must advise AECOM in writing within five business days of this meeting. NEWCASTLE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN STREET TO ARTHUR STREET Clarin un Leading the way NAME: (Please print clearly) CONTACT STREET: INFORMATION: I CITY: PHONE: COMMENTS: MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON Public Information Centre Wednesday, February 19, 2014 COMMENT SHEET POSTAL CODE: EMAIL: l � � ►' lQ i� �,5 ' � l cols (ib .0 CC 1 /l 1 e�qecj&ttybla Giha, � - the A?a ver/,1�1,y MIYO 6el) . i dont� bQl/ft f Mai 10e 5hal d d 74a_� IWVWV--,- 6bif of A-e pa"e-koy bad 0&,Je - -e e fs I n t'_JCUf (i-e: a11/--rcb - w1_L-Q l ,dell eve all '6- e ,PrdPased /1-P� ll� sh�vid Me Same /0 �&p fhe l/ii1 � vn r rrn cad Co as �Jof se e �/ie Co/e c� ��1f Please attach additional sheets or othef materials as necessary/ approprllate. We would appreciate receiving your comments before February 28, 2014. Please submit comment sheets to: Mr. Ron Albright, P. Eng. Inquire Directly at: Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Works Tel.: 905.623.3379 (ext. 230,F) Municipality of Clarington Fax: 905.623.9282 40 Temperance Street Email: RAlbright@clarington.net Bowmanville, ON L1C 3A6 Privacy Legislation Federal legislation governs the collection and use of personal information from individuals. By supplying your name, address, telephone number and/or e-mail address, YOU ARE CONSENTING TO the collection and use by AECOM of that personal information for the following purposes: recording and reporting to AECOM's client your attendance at this public meeting; attributing to you statements made by you at this meeting in any report that AECOM prepares regarding this project; contacting you to provide updates regarding the project, if requested by you; contacting you to request further comments or discussion of the project, should AECOM or the client deem this necessary or advisable. If you wish to limit the way that AECOM may use your personal information, as described above, you must advise AECOM in writing within five business days of this meeting. NEWCASTLE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN STREET TO ARTHUR STREET MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON (Licading Public Information Centre the Way � Wednesday, February 19, 2014 NAME: (Please print clearly) CONTACT INFORMATION COMMENT SHEET STREET: CITY: POSTAL CODE: PHONE: I EMAIL: COMMENTS: A-) I",c/ Please attach additional sheets or other materials as necessary/ appropriate. We would appreciate receiving your comments before February 28, 2014. Please submit comment sheets to: Mr. Ron Albright, P. Eng. Inquire Directly at: Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Works Tel.: 905.623.3379 (ext. 2305) Municipality of Clarington Fax: 905.623.9282 40 Temperance Street Email: RAIbright@clarington.net Bowmanville, ON L1C 3A6 Privacy Legislation Federal legislation governs the collection and use of personal information from individuals. By supplying your name, address, telephone number and/ore-mail address, YOU ARE CONSENTING TO the collection and use by AECOM of that personal information for the following purposes: recording and reporting to AECOM's client your attendance at this public meeting; attributing to you statements made by you at this meeting in any report that AECOM prepares regarding this project; contacting you to provide updates regarding the project, if requested by you; contacting you to request further comments or discussion of the project, should AECOM or the client deem this necessary or advisable. If you wish to limit the way that AECOM may use your personal information, as described above, you must advise AECOM in writing within five business days of this meeting. NEWCASTLE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS KING AVENUE FROM BALDWIN STREET TO ARTHUR STREET MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON OaAn�►in� Public Information Centre Leading the way �W Wednesday, February 19, 2014 COMMENT SHEET NAME: (Please print clearly) CONTACT STREET: INFORMATION: CITY: POSTAL CODE: PHONE: EMAIL: COMMENTS: . IfL- / I /1144,j -r-'LdftL1 r� Please attach additional sheets or other materials as necessary / appropriate. We would appreciate receiving your comments before February 28, 2014. Please submit comment sheets to: Mr. Ron Albright, P. Eng. Inquire Directly at: Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Works Tel.: 905.623.3379 (ext. 2305) Municipality of Clarington Fax: 905.623.9282 40 Temperance Street Email: RAlbright@clarington.net Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 Privacy Legislation Federal legislation governs the collection and use of personal information from individuals. By supplying your name, address, telephone number and/or e-mail address, YOU ARE CONSENTING TO the collection and use by AECOM of that personal information for the following purposes: recording and reporting to AECOM's client your attendance at this public meeting; attributing to you statements made by you at this meeting in any report that AECOM prepares regarding this project; contacting you to provide updates regarding the project, if requested by you; contacting you to request further comments or discussion of the project, should AECOM or the client deem this necessary or advisable. If you wish to limit the way that AECOM may use your personal information, as described above, you must advise AECOM in writing within five business days of this meeting.