HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSD-006-05
.
,"
\,
..
Cl!JlmglOn
REPORT
PLANNING SERVICES
Meeting:
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
Date: Monday, January 10, 2005
Atli l(/l/ cS-
By-law #:
Report #: PSD-006-05 File #: 18T -95009
Subject: APPLICATION BY BAYWOOD HOMES TO AMEND A DRAFT APPROVED
PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO DELETE A SERVICE LANE FOR 10 RESIDENTIAL
UNITS ABUTTING TOWN LINE ROAD SOUTH IN THE CITY OF OSHAWA
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PSD-006-05 be received;
2. THAT the City of Oshawa be advised that the Municipality of Clarington does not
support the application by Baywood Homes to remove the service lane in draft
approved plan of subdivision 18T-95009; and
3. THAT a copy of this report be forwarded to the City of Oshawa Development Services
Department and the Region of Durham Planning Department.
Submitted by:
David J. Crame, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning Services
& flf~
Reviewed bl)~~
Franklin Wu,
Chief Administrative Officer
BR/CS/DJC/lb
December 23, 2005
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET, BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO L 1 C 3A6 T (905)623-3379 F (905)623-0830
u ,~-;
.
, .
REPORT NO.: PSD-006-oS
PAGE 2
APPLICATION DETAILS
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
Owner:
Baywood Homes
Baywood Homes
Amendment to Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision to delete a
service lane for 10 semi/link residential units, to be replaced by
10 driveways directly off Townline Road South.
4.53 hectares (11.19 acres) for the entire draft approved plan of
subdivision.
Applicant/Agent:
Plan of Subdivision:
1.4 Area:
1.5 Location:
The area subject to the proposal is located west of Townline
Road South, south of Southgate Drive, north of the SI.
Lawrence & Hudson Railway in Lot 1, Broken Front Concession,
City of Oshawa.
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 On November 26, 2004, the Municipality of Clarington was circulated by the City of
Oshawa to provide comments on the above proposed amendment to draft plan of
subdivision. The proposed amendment would delete Condition 2 from the Conditions of
Draft Approval. The plan had been draft approved September 30, 1996.
2.2 The applicant claims the proposed amendment is needed since the marketability of the
five semi-detached lots (10 units) is open to question considering the affected properties
will be subject to full property taxes and the maintenance costs of the service lane at the
same time.
2.3 The applicant then stated that since the City of Oshawa has jurisdiction over the west
side of Townline Road South and the authority to grant draft plan approval, it should
delete Condition 2.The applicant requested that Oshawa's related requirements of site
plan approval and removal of a holding symbol also be eliminated.
3.0 OFFICIAL PLAN
3.1 Townline Road is designated as a Type B arterial road in the Clarington Official Plan. It
is planned that Townline will cross the Farewell Creek, connecting Townline Road North
and South and will eventually connect to Highway 401 with an interchange in the vicinity
of Prestonvale Road. Type B arterials are designed to move significant volumes of
traffic at moderate speeds. Access is generally to be limited to a minimum of 80 metres
apart in Urban Areas. The applicantion does not conform.
v .~ .j
\
#
REPORT NO.: PSO-D06-DS
PAGE 3
4.0 AGENCY COMMENTS
4.1 The Engineering Services Department stated Townline Road South is designated in the
Official Plan, both Durham and Clarington, as a future Type B Arterial Road, and as
such, feel that this decision is better made by the Region.
4.2 The Emergency and Fire Services Department stated it had no fire safety concerns.
5.0 STAFF COMMENTS
5.1 The introduction of the service lane concept was resolved as a means of dealing with
access issues when Townline Road was reclassified from Type C arterial to a Type B
arterial (see paragraph 2.2 (vi) and 2.3 of Report PD-112-96 (Attachment 2). To reverse
this position would be contrary to the policies of the Durham Region Official Plan and
the Clarington Official Plan. Accordingly, staff do not recommend support for the
applicants proposal.
6.0 CONCLUSION
6.1 That the City of Oshawa be advised that Clarington does not support the proposed
amendment to draft approval for draft plan of subdivision 18T-95009 as submitted by
Baywood Homes.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Key Map and Plan of Proposed Accesses
Attachment 2 - Report PD-112-96
List of interested parties to be advised of Council's decision:
City of Oshawa, Department of Development Services
Regional Municipality of Durham, Planning Department
Robert W. (Bill) Cawker, Project Manager
U t) d
\
.
o
,..,..,
~
()
o
--l
CD
o
N
,/
./
..0/
./ .....
,/
Oshawa/Courtice Key Map
3LOOR STREET
ATTACHMENT 1
I
I
I
I
II
~l
01
(J)
01
<(I
~I
wi
Z
--l1
IIZI
.3:
, 01
I ~I
I l
10ft
1
1
I :
i !
1ST -95009
Oshawa Subdivision File
o
~
"
w
w
~
Z
g
~
"
"
Owner: Baywood Homes
v ) t
ATTACHMENT 2
,
ON: 18T05000.GPlHE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARlNGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
Date:
General Purpose and Administration Committee
Tuesday, July 2, 1996
Rle #
Res. #
Report #:
Subject:
PD-112-96
Rle #:
18T-95009
By-law #
PROPOSED DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
APPLICANT: C & K MORTGAGE SERVICES
PART LOT 1, BROKEN FRONT CONCESSION
CITY OF OSHAWA
FILE: 18T-95009
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-112-96 be received;
2. THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department and the City of Oshawa be
advised that the Municipality of Clarington withdraws its objection to the draft plan
of subdivision 18T-95009 submitted by C & K Mortgage Services; and
3. THAT a copy of Report PD-112-96 be forwarded to the City of Oshawa Planning
Department, the Region of Durham Planning Department and the applicant.
1. BACKGROUND:
1.1 The applicant's lands are located at the southern terminus of Townline Road in
Part of Lot 1, Broken Front Concession in the City of Oshawa (see Attachment #1
to Report PD-30-96). The draft plan of subdivision proposes 42 townhouse units
and 38 semi-detached units, including 10 semi-detached units with direct access
to Townline Road South.
...2
- ....;
,
REPORT NO.: PD-112-96
PAGE 2
1.2 On March 11, 1996, Council adopted the recommendations of Report PD-30-96
and forwarded an objection to the above-referenced plan of subdivision in the City
of Oshawa (see Attachment #1). The Municipality's objection was based primarily
on concerns that the plan of subdivision would not conform to the standards for
a Type 'B' arterial road and that the Boundary Road Agreement with the City of
Oshawa needed to be updated to ensure that the City would assume all costs of
road reconstruction and future maintenance. These matters also related to the
Ontario Municipal Board hearing on the lands in South-West Courtice, to which
the City of Oshawa is a party objecting to the proposed reclassification of
Townline Road.
1.3 Through the Official Plan Review, the Municipality determined the need to amend
the classification of Townline Road (south of Bloor Street) from a Type 'c' to a
Type 'B' arterial. On January 23, 1996, the consultant for C & K Mortgage
Services registered an objection to the proposed reclassification of Townline Road
as a Type 'B' arterial (see Attachment #2), Notwithstanding this objection,
Council adopted the new Official Plan on January 29, 1996. Council also
authorized the Municipality's application to amend the Durham Region Official
Plan with respect to the classification of Townline Road (ROPA 96-002).
1.4 The Region will make a decision on the Municipality's official plan amendment
application concurrent with its approval of the Clarington Official Plan. This is
scheduled for September 1996.
2. PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF CONCERNS:
2.1 In an effort to resolve the Municipality's concerns, Regional staff convened several
meetings and held discussions with various parties. As an alternative to awaiting
a decision on the Municipality's Regional Plan amendment application or the
Ontario Municipal Board hearing on South-West Courtice, staff provided a number
of conditions which served as the basis for negotiations. ...3
V ':~. '....
REPORT NO.: PD-112-96
PAGE 3
2.2 These conditions have been resolved satisfactorily to staff as follows:
i) Staff Report PD-30-96 requested that the Stormwater Management
Implementation Report be forwarded to staff for review and approval. The
City has agreed to undertake this.
ii) Staff Report PD-30-96 noted concerns which may arise from potential
purchasers who would object to the development of lands for industrial
purposes in Clarington, Accordingly, staff requested that a clause be
included in the purchase and sale agreement to disclose future land uses
in Clarington. The City of Oshawa concurred.
Iii) Staff Report PD-30-96 indicated that the Municipality would not participate
in the reconstruction of Townline Road to serve this plan of subdivision.
A condition has been written to the satisfaction of the Public Works
Department with respect to the road standard for the reconstruction but the
subject of cost-sharing will be formally incorporated into a revised
Boundary Road Agreement. A letter dated June 21, 1996 from John
Simmonds, Director of Engineering for the City of Oshawa outlines the
understanding regarding cost sharing of future improvements (see
Attachment #3). Since the future alignment of Townline Road has not
been determined, it is not known how much of the reconstructed road will
be incorporated into the arterial road system. However, only if and when
the Municipality receives a benefit from this portion of the road would the
Municipality be obligated to share in the costs of this road reconstruction
work.
iv) Staff requested that a 5 metre road widening be imposed on the plan of
subdivision to allow for the future widening to a Type 'B' arterial road
standard. Staff subsequently agreed to a 3 metre road widening in light
...4
l.: ,,;:: ~i
. .
REPORT NO.: PD-112-96
PAGE 4
of the lack of a defined alignment for the future diversion of Townline Road
into the Employment Area and the proponents' proposal for a service lane
easement (see Section 2.3 below).
v) Staff requested that the proponent withdraw its objection to the Clarington
Official Plan and the Municipality's application ROPA 96-002 to amend the
Regional Official Plan regarding the classification of Townline Road. Ms.
D'Alessandro on behalf of the proponent has conditionally withdrawn her
objection provided the Municipality withdraws its objection to the plan of
subdivision (see Attachment #4),
vi) Staff requested that the City of Oshawa staff indicate their willingness to
recommend that the City of Oshawa withdraw their objection to the Type
'8' designation for Townline Road. Staff subsequently withdrew this
request in light of the provision of the front service lane/easement.
Nevertheless, a letter received from the City of Oshawa Public Works
Department on June 24, 1996, indicated that based on technical
information provided by the Municipality, ''the proposal to reclassify
Townline Road as a Type '8' arterial is reasonable, justifiable and can be
supported by this Department". This position is subject to Oshawa
Council's confirmation.
2,3 During the discussions, the applicant proposed a service lane/easement with two
access points at Lots 5 and 9. The service lane would limit the number of
accesses to Townline Road to a total of three (3) thereby meeting the Regional
Official Plan spacing requirement of 80 metres. This proposal is acceptable to
staff. The City of Oshawa passed a resolution on June 17, 1996 indicating its
support.
...5
~..' .,J. 1.
"
REPORT NO.: PO-112-96
PAGE 5
3. CONCLUSION:
In light of the above, the plan of subdivision complies with the spacing criteria of
the Regional Official Plan for Type '6' arterial roads and therefore would not be
prejudicial in the event that the City of Oshawa continues to object to the
designation in the Clarington Official Plan. The costs of upgrading the road to a
collector road standard would reside with the City of Oshawa. In the event that
the road provided some benefit to Clarington residents or businesses at a future
point in time, the boundary road agreement, to be negotiated in the near future,
would contain provisions regarding the Municipality's responsibilities for cost
sharing.
Accordingly, it is recommended that the Municipality withdraw its objection to the
draft plan of subdivision.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
o v~ 0 -Q~63~L-
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P"
Director of Planning
and Development
~~~
W. H. Stockwell
Chief Administrative
Officer
DC*FW*jip
25 June 1996
Attachment #3
Planning Department Report PD-30-96
Letter of Objection from AVD Planning & Development
Consulting
Letter from City of Oshawa on Approval Condition
Attachment #1
Attachment #2
Attachment #4
Objection Withdrawal Letter from AVD Planning &
Development Consulting
. i _~, ....
Attachment #1
.'
ON:C&KMORT.GPIHE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting:
Date:
General Purpose and Administration Committee
Monday, March 4, 1996
Rle #
Res. #
Report #:
Subject:
PD-30-96
Rle #: 18T.95009
By-law #
PROPOSED DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
C. & K. MORTGAGE SERVICES
PART LOT 1, BROKEN FRONT CONCESSION, CITY OF OSHAWA
FILE: 18T-95009
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration
Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-30-96 be received;
2. THAT the City of Oshawa and the Region of Durham be advised that the
Municipality of Clarington objects to the approval of the application for Draft
Plan of Subdivision 18T-95009 submitted by C & K Mortgage Services Inc.;
3. THAT a copy of this report be forwarded to the City of Oshawa and Region of
Durham Planning Departments; and,
4. THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised
of Council's decision.
1. APPUCATION DETAILS
1.1 Applicant:
1 .2 Agent:
1.4 Site Area:
C & K Mortgage Services Inc.
AVO Planning & Development Consulting
Umited
To permit the development of 38 semi-
detached units, 42 townhouse units, a
'parkette, and a stormwater management
facility.
4.53 heCtares (11.19 acres)
1.3 Draft Plan of Subdivision:
<.} J (;
. .
REPORT NO.: PD-30-96
2. LOCATION
2.1 The subject lands are located within the southern portion of Oshawa. The
property consists of Part Lot 1, Broken Front Concession in the City of
Oshawa. The property consists of a 4.53 ha (11.19 ac) parcel on the west
side of Townline Road.
PAGE 2
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 On March 24, 1995, the Municipality was requested to provide comments on
this Draft Plan of Subdivision application. Staff have delayed responding on
this application until such time as the designation of Townline Road was
confirmed through the consideration of the Clarington Official Plan.
3.2 The property represents a small, triangular residential site bordered by
Townline Road to the east, C.P. Railway tracks and Highway 401 to the west,
and existing residential development to the north. The proposal would extend
Southport Drive through the property from Southgate Drive at the north to
Townline Road. The townhouse units are proposed on the west side of
Southport Drive while the semi-detached units front onto the eastem side of
Southport Drive and Townline Road. A parkette is located at the northern end
of the proposal while a stormwater management facility is located at the
southern tip of the property.
3.3 The property was subject to a previous application for a non-profit, co-
operative housing development consisting of 49 apartment units in a 3-4 storey
building and 115 townhouse units. Although the City of Oshawa Planning
Department recommended approval, both the City of Oshawa and Durham
Regional Councils denied the proposal and the application was referred to the
Ontario Municipal Board. The appeal was dismissed on the basis -that the site
was too remote from services such as transit, schools, parks, retail areas, and
medical/dental clinics for an assisted housing project. The Board also felt that
the high noise levels from the nearby two railway tracks and Highway 401
1.1' "Ji '.t
. ,
REPORT NO.: PD-30-96
PAGE 3
would be more suitable to a development in which the buyer was aware of the
situation through warning clauses. As a result, a revised application has been
submitted.
4. AGENCY COMMENTS
4.1 The application was circulated to the Public Works Department for review. The
following comments have been received for consideration:
. The Neighbourhood Plan for Southwest Courtice indicates that West
Townline Road is being considered as a future Type B arterial road.
The draft plan of subdivision proposes lots fronting onto Townline Road
which would not be permitted under a Type B designation. The status
of Townline Road should be finalized and the plan revised to eliminate
access onto Townline Road.
. A stormwater management report must be submitted to the Public
Works Department for review and comment prior to draft approval. The
report must address the manner in which drainage from the site will be
handled, the stormwater management works required to service the
development, and ensure that no municipal or private lands are affected.
. Development of this plan of subdivision will necessitate the
reconstruction of Townline Road from Southgate Drive to the southerly
limit of the development, including the installation of sidewalk and street
lighting. As the reconstruction works are not required by the
Municipality, the City of Oshawa should assume and accept all costs for
the reconstruction and future maintenance of Townline Road. The
Boundary Road agreement between the City and the Municipality should
be amended to reflect these provisions.
'\,; j uJ
. .
REPORT NO.: PD-3o-96
PAGE 4
Until these issues have been addressed, the Public Works Department
considers the proposal to be premature.
5. STAFF COMMENTS
5.1 The Durham Region Official Plan designates Townline Road south of Bloor
Street as a Type C arterial. Direct access is permitted on Type C arterial
roads. The draft plan of subdivision proposes 1 0 lots that would access
directly onto Townline Road South.
5.2 The Clarington Official Plan, as adopted by Council on January 29, 1996,
designates Townline Road south of Bloor Street as a Type B arterial. In
addition, the Municipality has requested that the Region amend its Official Plan
accordingly. Regional policies do not permit lots with frontage on and direct
access to a Type B arterial road. The draft plan of subdivision does not
conform with the Clarington Official Plan and the Municipality's application to
amend the Durham Region Official Plan.
5.3 It is noted that the issue of the designation of Townline Road is a matter which
will be considered by the Ontario Municipal Board at the hearing related to .
various applications in southwest Courtice. The Municipality has requested the
Region to refer a portion of the Clarington Official Plan to be consolidated with
that hearing, including the designation of Townline Road. Until this matter is
resolved, the draft plan of subdivision should not be approved or should be
redesigned to eliminate lots with direct frontage on Townline Road.
.'
5.4
The Boundary Road agreement between the City of Oshawa and the
.'
Municipality of Clarington should be updated to reflect changing circumstances
in both Municipalities. At a recent meeting with respect to the southwest
Courtice OMB hearing, Public Works officials from both municipalities agreed
to initiate discussions on this matter. Utitil there is an agreement with respect
u
'"..j
. .
'1;" qT NO.: PD-3D-96
PAGE 5
to the road widening, reconstruction, and future maintenance, the approval of
this draft plan of subdivision is premature.
.5 It is noted that a portion of the proposed plan of subdivision is adjacent to
Prestige Employment lands in the Municipality of Clarington. It is important
that potential buyers be aware of the land use designations in Clarington to
avoid future misunderstandings or potential objections to industrial
development in Clarington. Accordingly, it is recommended that at such time
that draft approval may be considered, a condition of approval would require
the subdivision agreement to contain a clause requiring the vendor to post a
plan showing future land uses in the Municipality of Clarington.
6. CONCLUSIONS
5.1 Based on the discussion in this report, it is apparent that the application is
premature until various issues have been resolved and that the draft plan of
subdivision is redesigned. It is recommended that the Municipality register an
OBJECTION to this proposal with the City of Oshawa and the Durham Region
Planning Departments.
Respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
d r 1'-<-. LQ ---..:. 6.3l-G
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning
and. Development
~~~/
W.H. Stockwell
Chief Administrative
Officer
RH*FW*df
Attachment #1 - Key Map
lit '1ment #2 - Draft Plan of Subdivision
r-ebruary 1996
l." Ji "
.'
ATTACHMENT #1.
LOT 35
LOT 34
LOT 33
LOT 32
~ ]
~J
GRANDVlEW 5
o
I , DRIVE '"
i;s
II
I
~
'"
BLOOR STREET
~
'3
w
z
::J
z
'"'
l:!
\
BASEUNE ROAD
401
rgj SUBJECT SITE
C'l
Z
o
(f)
(f)
w
u
z
o
u
KEY MAP FOR 18T-95009
'lJ -;:~-
e) STREETS SHALL IE tlNolCtI .. COHWLT#lTK:fl l'IltH THE
.......""",
C) MtItfPltt1O(TS mE Al"PtJCN(f'S onlM: HCXJIItoIG'S 0(
~ UHO If lKS W':IHITY.
Q t1lIS~ VS(S 0# ~C LNCI$: MSlDEN1IAL
H} 1'R0I"0Sm WAD SUPPLY: WUHIOl'AL w"~,,,"s.
l) SClL: SNCIT LDAY
Ie) IUU. WfCIl'AL IOMCtS TO . IHSTAUm atC1UOlHC
=T~ IfOIIlII a:wos.. '1.'00 1l0A0S W1'lH CUFllI
l.) lid(. IN. NO u.stWENn 0It llUnK1M: CO'<04NfTS
AntCTlfKllMS P1KIf'UITY.
/
/
~\
" \ \
\\
\ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\\ \\ A
\\\\~
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\\\\i:,
\\\\t>
\ \ \ \ .j.
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \\\ ~
\\ \c>
\ \ \ 10.\ ~
\ ~~\-
AAEA (...) ";;i ~'t. '.1-
\ *\ ",,\
\.... ''1:.\ \ \
\,'b, \~\
,... \"\.\ \ \ -1<.
<<~.....) \\\ \ \ C!
~... \ \ \ \
0.1)) \ \ \ \
GoU \ \ \
CUI \\\\~
a..n \ \ \ \ /'
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \\ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ \
\\\\ /
\ \ \ \/
\ \~
'>~
I
ATTACHMENT #2
*
\
'.
"5 REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECT10N 51 or THE
Pl..AHtfiNC ACT:
.
~. \
*. \
. i.~
. ''l
". ~
~~
~l
r
11 il
. ~
I, ~I
'.m., ~Id
,,:;:
~;\;
-: 11 ~ ::u
-\' il~
'I ~('
\: . en
. 0
,21c
t ~ ... -I
. . -<l:c.
. \ ~l \
:~I::' \
:.t EI
:h~1 \
'" ., \1
", :\: h \\
JI\
'I I \
I I
"\.1 I .\
.I
I I
I.
'1: I
I.
. I
I
,',
"
'.
PROPOSED lAND USES
DESCRIPTIONS
.................""'"""""
LOTS 10 '10 It
flE$lDOfTlAL 1LOrn son:
lQTS'TOU
."""
"
0..>>1\ ltESlEJt'ot: .. tlOCK 10
TOTALS
,
IOUtfl1'5
....
(I.o.r.t)
\ "
. '.'\.
. '. ~~.::',;,,-
, ,,8(~':g,,~'<J'"
\ ....... ':K '118'
... 'l' '. ""-"',--
>\
'......
J&
P'All:1'lOlS - kOClC'U (DISSWfli)
llJ)CII:u(SOIl)
WJ,J.J(WAY _ kOCIC ".I$., N<<) ..
.
.
,
lOCAl."1oN( -1l,.OOC 17
S1'ClMI WADNA,NAC(WDfT-IUt"
.1.OrftIl.OAD~-Il..OO("
lI.o",m:t(l.OI'I'I
,,"'.
. HOlt G.08M MEA ts PNl.T (IE 1.~ Wtf.J. rOft SOoll'$.
MINIMUM LOT DIMENstONS :
..Im ntOHTACE ~ - ..enAI LOT MU. : lis...'
'LCm fROHTAO( (SOII"S) - .....uw UlT AAU. : ,:.om'
1.5m ~0USEt - TOTAl ntOMTACI( - .lOuOm
ll.em so.rs - TOTAl ntONTACE ... 3lILI'...
ADDmONAL INFORMATION :
."
U".i. J
. 6 .
,
,
"
, ^\WW"
~ ~', '-'
-
Attachment #2
PLANNiNG & DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING LID.
JAIl 26
II 26 AH '96
January 23, 1996
VIA TELECOPIER & MAIL
Ms. Patti L. Barrie, A.M.C.T.
Clerk
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, Onta-rio
LlC 3A6
Dear Ms. Barrie:
RE: Clarington Official Plan
A YD Planning & Development Consulting Ltd. represents C & K Mortgage Services Inc. and
Aldana
Properties Inc., owners of property on the west side of Townline Road, in the City of Oshawa
(see attached locational plan).
In March, 1995, we submitted on behalf of our ylients a proposed draft plan of subdivision
(18T-95009) which conforms with both the City of Oshawa Official Plan and the Region of
Durham Official Plan.
Your proposed new official plan and the proposed South-west Courtice NeighbourhOOd Plan
propose that Townline Road be re-classified from a Type C to a Type B road. This proposal
does not conform to the Region of Durham Official Plan nor the City of Oshawa Official
Plan. Until such a time that the appropriate studies have been completed to justify such a
redesignation, showing it in your official plan is premature.
In addition to the foregoing, any such reclassification seriously affects the viability of my
client's development plans.
As such, please accept this letter as our objection to the proposed reclassiP.cation of Townline
Road to Type B. We respectfully request that Council not approve the reclassification of
Townline Road to Type B.
1...2
3800 STEELES AVE. WEST., SUITE 20m, WOODBRIDGE. ONTARIO L4L 4G9, TEL (905) 850-2040, FAX: (9051 850-2041
'vi <'; ~J'
-~ .
-2-
We trust the foregoing to be satisfactory at this time however, should you require additional
information or clarification on any of the above-noted information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Yours very truly,
A VD PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTING LTD.
~. J),'~dJ)
Anna V. D' Alessandro
Principal
attach.
cc.
C & K Mortgage Services Inc.
Aldana Properties Inc,
City of Oshawa
Region of Durham
-----,1
_. ,:~~ :....:. .'- ~ ;::: ;...j l
___i
. ....---..-.- ,
!
.__.PH' ,
--- ----~ ----.j
-', .
._~_,n.'_~"_____'
- --' ~
.------"
-.--.-'.-.
- ----
o .;Z C;;."'"T'C
J.
3800 STEELES AVE. W" SUITE 202W, WOODBRIDGE. ONT. L4L 4G9, TEL.: (905) 850.2040, FAX: (905) 850-2041
SENT Jill -24 '-96' 09: 1sAM' ~ PL~fNGDEP'f,9PM
- .
, . .
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.~
, 81'072/212:# 2
Attachment -#3
~
.oshawa
DeIIartmentof
PWI\c: Warb Services
AII1und Myldebod, B.A.Se, P.Eng.
Commissioner
19960621
FAX 623-9282 AND MAIL.
tJr5ftwJ..
SO Centre Street South
OShawa, C>t1tarlo, L1 H 3Z7
_ rei (90S) 725-7351
~~,. . Jax'(90Sl 436-5694
". ~~
,.:'(.)-
QUV;d-~
..1.11
,.,
Mr. T. Cannella. Manager .of Englnoering
Municipality of C1arlngton
40 Temperance Street
Sowmanvllle, Onterio
L.tC 3A6
.....I\Iu f;::.it
REGIONAL cRAFT PLAN CONDITION-TOWNUNE ROAD SUBDIVISION 1BT-95009 (AVD SUBDIVISION
AGREEMENTI. OUR PILI: S0288-1 AND D41oo.&4018' .
This is further lC our recent telophone conversation of June 21, 1996 regllrdlng flnatrzing'the Regional
olause regarding draft plan approval for the ebDVe subdivision.
It was a!ilrGed that the Ian two sentences of this clause, starting et "nO costs... . would be delsted.
The U.!lence of me Clause ramains. in that the City wiU reconstruct Townlinll Road to the standard
referenced In the 1979 Boundary Road ASrGament.
Our nsxt step, liS both Boundary RollC! Agreemantl heve expired, Is to enter into a new one which wDl
addre" Townline Road from Its southerly limit to lts.noJ1her\y limit.. As discussed, should any section
of Townllne Road, Inchsding .this one, not bll ullld by Clarington. thin the cOl\U of reconStructing the
road would remain with the CitY of OshawI, and there would be no reimbursement from the
MuniCipallty of CIarIngton. .
This sltuetion could happen, for Instence if. the south end of Townline Road became 8 d~d end and
Will no longer reQulred u part of the arterial system shawn on the Regional Offlcl8l Plan, :and thare
was consequently no link to any development on Clarington', side.
I trust that this Imer prgvides you with euffioient comfort IInd thu we will blil uble to enter ItIlC
negotiations to eondude II new boundary rgad IIgrGement that will foUow the ganlltlll principles of the
previous Boundary Road Agreemems. To thiS end, we could get together after my holidays in the first
two weeks of .July and atart the proceedings.
Should you h,lYe any qUlltlons, please feel free to give me a call at 725-7351 extension '260.
~
t? ? $-e--
...I. ~ &immonda. P. En9. -:'"I
Director of Engineering
COpy:
A. DeFalla-Reglon of Durham !fax 436-6612)
T. Hodgins
P. Ralph
A. Myldllbaat
@
m.DD_'
j.. , .'
J "r' :...
",' '''' ..... ..._" ....---....-.-. .--.-
:",.., T'JUN 12 ' 95 02: 45PI'1 DURHA~l PLAI'," I f,G- DEPtP.i9S Tim.: 14:22:52
, 06/12198 1.1: S4 '1:$'416 850 2041 .
. .' # .
AYD
PLANNING & DEV8.0PMENT CONSULTING Ll!t'
,
P. 2/31- 2 DI a
Iai 002
Attachment #4
June 12, 1996
Ms. Amn :DeP'atia.
Cummt (>P"'-"''l1)US Branch
Durbam J~cm PlanniDg Depanmeat
1615 Dundas St, E.. 4th Floor
Lang Tower. We$t BullAl'1g
P.O. Bo'l 623
Whitby, I)n1arlo
LlN 6A3
. , ,
..."._--'-- .
Oul"lt"l~.,. ' ~,~'4!l!!.~~~.~......._
r'l';:-~'''''''\ , '~:'~~.~"\~~__...
, <!'ioT"" lI.l:~'~\:'I ...
"~;':-;;\:l;~~
.,-_.__.-..~.
',..~;- .... ~-i..ti..j.r1
~-~.......
.. ,._",.~:".',t, >ll.L;nOf
--..-.... ._-.-
VIA TEl:.ECOl!lER. & MAIL
..I.'-IN -:-r
.,t)"
.~.. .......
OUN 1 2 1996
y 2< 11,:l.
. -_._~--,,,,_.-
,..,;~,l~~\; 1='<'1. yo,
.tjji\l~\"'~
,;.....,.-...--......
Dear Ms.DeFaris.:
RE:
Applica1iOn for'Pm!tPlan of;Subdivisio.n
C &:K Morr..~ Services Inc. (.4.ld~n,. Pl"'~-=S Inc.)
Part of Lot 1, :Bl:i:Jk= Front Concession.
City of Osha.wa., ~"giQD of'D"m........
Fi1eN~:, 18T~009 lIJId 51649
. . .
, '. - .,.
Further t!:l our telephone COllvemtion l:bis is to confum that my cHcnlS' in~ a.o.d o~e.~
to the reclassification of Townline Road to a Type "Bw artm:ial road applies Only in:sqfar as it
a.ffi:c::fs iti: lands l~Wl in the City of Oshawa aiid :which lands have frontage On Townline
Roa. d ....' ", ,-, ,
'. . , ,
. , " . ,
This is also to smve as con&matioli that we withdraw our objection to the t~'.~c!fi~ti...n of'
ToWDline .Roal1 from a Type .C. to a Type "B~ a:rterla1 road. subject to ~ M11!1icipalil;y DC
Claringtall' WfthdrawiDg i1s Objection to my dient's draft plaD. or sub~. '
Pina1l.y, tllis is a1&o to confirm 1hat my"clients have agreed to :restrict dimct: aceess onto
Townline Road"to two (2) 1.ocaIio1lS, in compliance with ,the proposed Type B ammaI IlOad.
The ~ener.1l1I'lci!tTon of these ll";''''''se~ will .be at Lots 5 and 9, and a serviceta~s easerllel1t
will be cru.teci across the frout of the mm",,,lT1g lots to ;;'''';1~t.. ~ and: ~ fur tJ!tese
'prgperties. It shoaJd be W1der.;tood hOWl!Ver~ thaJ: ~e agreed to 1'lStrid.iolH Ai'e cmee
, again col1tUttona111pon the Mim1dpality of CIaringto.n; wi1fldrawing itsobJ~ to q- .
.....-.aieDt's dJ:8ftp~afmbdi.oo.on.. .. ..: ..- ..... , ,.... , ..
1_..2
3800 srm.ES RIG.. W5l:. SUITE 2rmi, WOODBRIIlGE. ONMO l4L 4G9. TEL.: (905) B51J.~ FiI.lC (S05) SSCi-2041
'U .} ,j
",",en: TJUI', 12'95 02:..l-:-P~1 DURHA~1 PLANNING DEPTl!J96 'nm.,'4:22:52
~e\il2ljlS , 13; S4 '8'416. ~50 2041
P.3-:::':=:la3ofa
41 003
.2-
I trUSt~: foregcnng U; be ~ry liowivei:-, should you~""LuU" addi.tiO~ iilforillarilonor
c1aI:ifi~[()n.:please. do riot 'hcsitatCto anital:t ~. ' ,. ,
, YoUrs very~y;,
.. -~
. A'VJ) PLANNiNG .l;)EVl7DPMENT
" :CONSDLTIN~ LTJ;k:.-:
....1. (I.../k.;~,. /J) .,
r.',~~-' -. ,.
~ V. D'.A].....;...tI"o
ti,..;:..,""-1
""~~..
cc.C&K~ages "- -, - '....
. Aldana. Properties l..td... . ". -. . .
,:Plli1l RalPh.;Osh&M:P1""~"g ,
'. '''.' .. ,
.' .,
.".
..
"
.i'
"
.'
" '"
'.
-.
.,
"--.
., . '. ~ . ;' , , I . , '
aaoo =is AVE.. W.; GUrnll1J!W.. WO,OCBllIPG~ ONT. L4L4GDi Tm....: ceo5J ~, "AX: tllOS) SSO-2041
- -, .
.' l;-,j]