Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-10-25Clar*wn General Government and Planning and Development Committees Post -Meeting Agenda Date: October 25, 2021 Time: 9:30 AM Location: Council Members (in Chambers or MS Teams) I Members of the Public (MS Teams) Inquiries & Accommodations: For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations for persons attending, please contact: Lindsey Patenaude, Committee Coordinator, at 905-623-3379, ext. 2106 or by email at Iatenaude@clarington.net. Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. AudioNideo Record: The Municipality of Clarington makes an audio and/or video record of Council and Committee meetings. If you make a delegation or presentation or attend, the Municipality will be recording you and will make the recording public by on the Municipality's website, www.clarington.net/calendar. Noon Recess: Please be advised that, as per the Municipality of Clarington's Procedural By-law, this meeting will recess at 12:00 noon, for a one hour lunch break, unless otherwise determined by the Committee. Cell Phones: Please ensure all cell phones, mobile and other electronic devices are turned off or placed on non -audible mode during the meeting. Copies of Reports are available at www.clarington.net *Late Item added or a change to an existing item after the Agenda was published. Pages 1. Call to Order 2. Land Acknowledgement Statement 3. Declaration of Interest 4. Announcements 5. Public Meetings *5.1. Public Meeting to Seek Comments on the Draft Wilmot Creek 6 Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Planner: Lisa Backus, Principal Planner and Sarah Parish, Planner II 5.1.1. PDS-052-21 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan 53 *5.2. Public Meeting for a Proposed Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law 148 Amendment Applicant: Beach Road Villas Inc. Location: 684, 688, 694 and 704 North Street, Newcastle Planner: Brandon Weiler, Senior Planner 5.2.1. PDS-053-21 Applications by Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista 169 Homes Corporation and Panterra Inc. for a Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment to Permit 131 Residential Units in Newcastle 6. Presentations/Delegations 6.1. David Veenstra, St. Marys Cement Community Relations Committee Co- 182 Chair, and Tanya Pardy, Ruben Plaza, Yhon Downie and John Fahey, St. Marys Cement, Regarding the St. Marys Cement Community Relations Committee Annual Update 6.2. Renata Young, Regarding a Request to Move Streetlight on Harry Lee 198 Crescent in Bowmanville (Correspondence Attached) *6.3. Brian Reid regarding the Application Process for the Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Management Advisory Committee (Agenda Item 9.3.3) Page 2 *6.4. Wendy Bracken regarding Provincial Review of Ontario Regulation 218 79/15: Alternative Low -Carbon Fuels of the Environmental Protection Act (Agenda Item 9.1.3) *6.5. Wendy Bracken regarding concerns regarding St. Marys Cement's 232 application to amend their current ECA to install an "Ultimate Cell Continuous Combustion Unit" in the cement kiln in Bowmanville (ERO 019-4320) *6.6. Linda Gasser regarding Provincial Review of Ontario Regulation 79/15: 243 Alternative Low -Carbon Fuels of the Environmental Protection Act (Agenda Item 9.1.3) *6.7. Linda Gasser regarding concerns regarding St. Marys Cement's application to amend their current ECA to install an "Ultimate Cell Continuous Combustion Unit" in the cement kiln in Bowmanville (ERO 019-4320) *6.8. Kerry Meydam, Regarding Item 9.1.3 Provincial Review of Ontario Regulation 79/15: Alternative Low -Carbon Fuels of the Environmental Protection Act (Agenda Item 9.1.3) 7. Reports/Correspondence Related to Presentations/Delegations 8. Communications 8.1. Minutes of the Energy from Waste - Waste Management Advisory 253 Committee dated September 28, 2021 (Receive for Information) 8.2. Minutes of the Historic Downtown Bowmanville Business Improvement 259 Area dated September 14, 2021 (Receive for Information) 8.3. Minutes of the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority dated 263 September 16, 2021 (Receive for Information) 8.4. Minutes of the Newcastle Business Improvement Area dated October 14, 267 2021 (Receive for Information) Page 3 9. Staff Reports and Staff Memos 9.1. 9.2. 9.3. Planning and Development Services 9.1.1. PDS-054-21 Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan Update 270 9.1.2. PDS-055-21 Recommendation - Additional Dwelling Units - 335 Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments 9.1.3. New Business - Provincial Review of Ontario Regulation 79/15: 385 Alternative Low -Carbon Fuels of the Environmental Protection Act (Councillor Zwart) Public Works 9.2.1. PWD-027-21 Proposed Amendment to By-law 2014-059 to 387 allow for All -Way Stop Signs at Various Locations 9.2.2. Memo from Stephen Brake, Director of Public Works, Regarding 437 Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Viewing Platform Replacement (Motion for Direction) 9.2.3. New Business - Lighting at Courtice Dog Park (Councillor 439 Jones) Legislative Services *9.3.1. LGS-027-21 2022 Municipal Elections — Use of Corporate 440 Resources for Election Purposes — Policy F110 (Section 5.3 of the Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Policy - Attachment 1 to Report LGS-027-21 has been updated) 9.3.2. LGS-028-21 Additional Dwelling Unit Registration By-law 452 *9.3.3. New Business - Application Process for the Samuel Wilmot 461 Nature Area Management Advisory Committee (Councillor Traill) (In Accordance with the Procedural By-law, This Matter Requires 2/3 Majority Vote to be Considered) *9.3.4. New Business - Jury Lands Ditching (Councillor Traill) 462 (In Accordance with the Procedural By-law, This Matter Requires 2/3 Majority Vote to be Considered) Page 4 10 11 12 13 14 *9.3.5. New Business - Recreation Vehicle Storage (Councillor Traill) (In Accordance with the Procedural By-law, This Matter Requires 2/3 Majority Vote to be Considered) 9.4. Financial Services 9.4.1. FSD-049-21 Roadmap for Community Board Sustainability 9.4.2. FSD-046-21 CL2021-18 Flett Street and Parkway Avenue Reconstruction 9.4.3. FSD-047-21 Toyota Trail Connection - Soper Creek Trail to Bowmanville Cemetery 9.4.4. FSD-048-21 Appointment of Alternate to Audit and Accountability Committee 9.5. CAO Office 9.5.1. Memo from Andy Allison, Chief Administrative Officer, Regarding Executive Recruiting Services for Recruitment of a Chief Administrative Officer New Business — Consideration Unfinished Business Questions to Department Heads/Request for Staff Report(s) Confidential Items 13.1. Confidential Report CAO-010-21 Potential Disposition of Land (Distributed Under Separate Cover) Adjournment I:[:w M Em EIRIN EM Page 5 Clarington Notice of Public Meeting The Municipality is seeking public comments on the draft Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan. After extensive consultation, the Municipality is ready to present and receive input on the draft Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan and Sustainable Development Guidelines at a Statutory Public Meeting. This Secondary Plan is a Municipality of Clarington project. The draft Secondary Plan includes the lands south of Highway 401, east of Bennett Road, and north of the Canadian National Rail line. The Secondary Plan area is immediately north of the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan and Sustainable Development Guidelines do not apply to the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. The purpose of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan (and the implementing Official Plan Amendment) is to provide land use planning policies and design guidelines that will balance population growth, a variety of housing types, while protecting the natural environment and providing for a built environment that creates a safe, healthy and active neighborhood. The Secondary Plan will allow for the development of assisted living units as well as housing for seniors. Approximately 700-1100 housing units can be accommodated in the Secondary Plan area. Staff are also seeking your input on the Draft Sustainable Development Guidelines Framework that have been prepared to advance the vision of this Secondary Plan. The Framework will outline how the Guidelines will implement sustainability strategies that consider energy conservation, water use and management, mobility, buildings, open spaces and people to support a community that is resilient to the potential impacts of climate change. o � a W Z z Y W V m HIGHWO 4p1 Ce LU W z env LU m� pat�� WILMOT-TRAIL Lake Ontario a o Y,'R Z W O. Z Z Z � 0 o �A W i LJ WILMOT.TRAI C7�11 U The proposed Official Plan Amendment, including additional information and background studies, will be available for review at Clarington.net/WilmotCreek beginning on October 5t", 2021. Questions? Please contact Lisa Backus, Principal Planner at 905-623-3379, extension 2413, or by email at LBackus(a-)clari ngton. net or Sarah Parish, Planner II at 905-623-3379 extension 2432 or by email at Sparish a@clarington.net. If you wish to be notified of the decision of Clarington Council on the proposed Official Plan Amendment, you must make a written request to the Municipal Clerk, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6. Our procedures have changed as we continue to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic. As mandated by Public Health, to maintain physical distancing these meetings will take place electronically. Statutory Public Meeting Date: Monday, October 25t", 2021 Time: 9:30 am Place: Microsoft Teams meeting either online or by telephone The Meeting will start at 9:30 am. If you wish to participate, anytime after 9:15 am, you may join the meeting by visiting the Municipal website at www.clarington.net/calendar. Click on the Join Microsoft Teams Meeting link provided in the "How to Join the Electronic Public Meeting" document next to the Agenda. You can also call the telephone number, 1-289-274-8255 Conference ID: 394 795 252 If you wish to speak at the public meeting, please pre -register by completing the online form at www.clarington.net/delegations or contact the Clerk's Division at 905-623-3379 extension 2109 or clerks clarington.net by Friday, October 22nd, 2021, at 3:30 pm. Written Submission If you wish to provide comments on this application, please submit them to Lisa Backus, at Ibackus(o-)_clarington.net. Written comments can be mailed or dropped off at 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6. A drop box is located at the Church Street entrance. File Number: COPA 2021 — 0005 (PLN 41.1) Right of Appeal If a person or public body would otherwise have an ability to appeal the decision of Clarington Council to the Ontario Land Tribunal but the person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions to the Municipality of Clarington before the proposed official plan amendment is adopted, the person or public body is not entitled to appeal the decision. If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions to the Municipality of Clarington before the proposed official plan amendment is adopted, the person or public body may not be added as a party to the hearing of an appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal unless, in the opinion of the Tribunal, there are reasonable grounds to add the person or public body as a party. Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act The personal information you submit will become part of the public record and may be released to the public. Questions about the information we collect can be directed to the Clerk's Department at 905- 623-3379, extension 2102. Accessibility If you have accessibility needs and require alternate formats of this document or other accommodations, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 extension 2131. Ryan Windle, MCIP, RPP, AICP Director - Planning and Development Services Page 7 Statutory Public Meeting Official Plan Amendment for the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan D F --------- ------------ E7 ._._.._._ _ .. _.....- M crew came _ _ � Q c� •.. ": ' C.L:.... '�T-ill':., - � Est c n c iti Lisa Backus Carlos Salazar Karen Richardson Nicole Swerhun ;f Matthew Wheatli 0 Steering Committee Municipal staff Municipal consultants Regional staff CLOCA LOG representatives WCHA representatives T19 e lanninPartnershi Ron Palmer Stacey McCulloch ��;CONIIAR Page 9 2 Part I — Project Background • Background • Secondary Plan Process • Early Community Engagement Part II — Draft Secondary Plan Documents • Vision + Principles _ • Policies + Guidelines - 10 ' • Current Engagement Part III — Next Steps • Receive Comments • Revise Document • Recommendation Report • Zoning By-law Amendment < �r �1F.CL1;\11AR z�xrri� Lisa Backus Stacey McCulloch Lisa Backus Page 10 DRAFT: T Nei �1F.CL1;\11AR • Adds detail to the objectives and policies of Clarington's Official Plan to fit the local context • Establishes more focused development guidelines unique to an area to guide growth &change • Promotes a desired type and form of physical development in a specific area • Guides public and private investment around infrastructure and amenities Page 11 '010 1 B1_\:�'a: PIANJi 0 TAUNTON ROAD o Neighbourhoods ° o New Secondary Plan LL $ $ conformity update w Farewell a F4( Neighbourhood Plan Conversion Creek Centres and Employment Areas _._ ONCE 1 N ROAD o p - New Secondary Plan gNei Far wall hts a ° Soper a Creek - Existing Secondary Plan ° Conformity update No thglen o o Soper Springs a Worden Han ock East a a o r w NASH ROAD CONCESSIO 4 ROAD Y Courtic_:Main Street Y O < z w MH & o Av nd a o Br okhill z p z a F ° s _ C Southeast Courti N10E N yTREET Robinson- So th Iooley Creek Soper CONCLSS NROAD3 West Creek o - HillsN orth ourtic BowmanvilleWest> \m f o w Village 2 oTown Centre Goodyear Bowmanville East J o o Special Study `Town Centre North Area I Village � O� M H✓Gry� 1 � 2 — - rington Foster To hnology West wlcHw AY 411 Park x o o Newcastle Town.Centre COIYI'tlCe ENERGY DRNE -� Waterfront Clarington Energy Park Port barlington Wilm t Courtice �_ % a Bowmanville IV X Newcastle Village Page 12 Part 1— Project Background Page 13 'ILMOT CREEK NEIGHBOURHOOC F-CONDARY PLAN AREA lap Secondary Plan Study Area F '' 10J. Wilmot Creek Community Secondary Plan Study Area Size: 42 hectares (104 acres) Location: South of Hwy. 401 East of Bennett Road North of CN Rail line and existing Wilmot Creek Community Garftwn IN�7� rww,rou[u6e.caNCliingoenPX �Lti �eugtrtrdariugtd�ON To obtain this information in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 The Municipality of Clarington has been requested to prepare a Secondary Plan to facilitate the development of the final phases the Wilmot Greek Neighbourhood. A secondary plan is a detailed development framework for a specific area that includes land u density and building types, environmental protection and sustainability features as well as active transportation. At the public meeting, there are no development approvals requested. You are invrtea to present your comments to ine committee at a puouc meeting neia on at the Municipal Administrative Centre, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville. The Planning and Development Committee of Council will only be considering the Terms of Reference (TOR) for the project. The TOR outline the process and studies required for the development of the Secondary Plan. Once the TOR are finalized, the project will be subject to a Request for Proposals for a consulting team to lead in the formation of a Secondary Plan. A The staff report and other information will be available at www. clarin gton .neVdevelo prnentproposals. For more information or to be added to the project mailing list, contact e� m Carlos Salazar at 905-623-3379, ext. 2409 or csalazar@clarington.net or Lisa Backus, at 905-623-3379 ext 2413 or Ibackus@clarington.net. Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act IA' The personal information you submit will become part of the public record and may be released to the public. Questions about the information we collect can be directed to the Clerk's Department at 905-623-3379, ext. 2102.' P.4,.1 p.m. Secondary Plan Boundary Lake Dmam Wilmot Creek community PIAN Offivon N-1-28, 2017 Mr. Douglas Humphrey 120 Port Darlington Road Unit 23 Bowmanville, ➢d_L1 C 3U Dear Slr, Subject: Privately InitiatedS--dart' Plan for Wilmot Creek Ne igh bonrhopd Fl le Nnmber-. PLN 41.1 Thnll It L d l 1 Rl 9 d_ 1G pl prep t [ tl 1 -. f III ftl Cre YII F dII p f_ .-. l spe tl t l d d t I :p .mimel.l pteal ,,d ts ,Ii l- at I__ t rt t Al th p cmee.'19 a1, de, e11 t pp �'als ry 1dL Youe; e "It lI. ... e.t; conlre l t, "Gonlnl'L =_',I a _public meeting held In Monday, December 4, 2017 a14 p.m. Municipal Adminialrative Centre 40 Temperance Street, Bpwma.AW The Planning and D—lopm,nl Committee of Caundl will Dolt he wrral],ring the Terms of Refe-ence J,,R)vrt-a pled. Th. TC c_lior Me devslcpnr:r-.f tYe Secs -don P =_n. Once the TC. ara d"ll-d the Fn _emvfll ,a subje:A-e ?e:laes: hr Frep zal=fc-a co sril!-��-eem:o lead Inthe far-a:lon ofe Secordsr: F_,. Thastafi'el:cD and .fre'IrPornalbn -III to a.allakf=at Farmore A,i,-, i,i, prb: 1, adcad 1p-he 1, j,nnee I=ttact GelfSalazara[ 905-623-33-9_ ut 240fl or___ or LL- Bs:,i:.,s. a'. S-,5 623r33T5 es.. 2413 cr _2uslNcla lit.-na:. Yoa s Lis,B--,, °tic pal Plann,r unity Plann'mg and Design Branch C, DarddCmmeDire,larofPlandingSni— wdns Salazar, Managar of C..—ltv Planning and Devgn The Secondary Plan will address four priorities: SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMAT CHANGE Sustainable "green lens" approach to development URBAN DESIGN Complete community, high quality aesthetic and design AFFORDABLE HOUSING Variety of housing types and tenures COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Range of engagement opportunities 1:E Page 16 Secondary Plan Process NPW StijrliPs • Active Transportation Analysis • Water and Wastewater Servicing Plan • Floodplain Analysis and Stormwater Management Plan • Landscape Analysis • Sustainability Background Report • Urban design Analysis • Hydrogeological Investigation and Water Balance Study Uadate Studies • Air Quality Assessment • Archeological Assessment • Geotechnical Investigation • Traffic Impact Study — Existing Conditions Assessment • Noise and Vibration Study • Existing Environmental and Geomorphological Conditions Report PUBLIC INPUT Facilitator Public Information Centre #1 Alternative Development Concepts Technical Reports Completed PUBLICINPUT Facilitator Public Information Centre #2 Online Engagement Secondary Plan Sustainable Development Guidelines Technical Reports Implementing Zoning By- law PUBLICINPUT Statutory Public Meeting Detailed Background Studies that were completed during Phase 1 Existing Environmental and Geomorphological Conditions Re[ Air Quality Assessment Archaeological Assessment Geotechnical Investigation Traffic Impact Study — Existing Conditions Assessment Noise and Vibration Study Active Transportation Analysis Water Wastewater Servicing Plan Floodplain Analysis/Stormwater Management Plan Landscape Analysis Urban Design Analysis Sustainability Background Report Page 18 Hydrogeological Investigation and Water Balance Study ' WI LMOT CREEK secondary plan PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE PIC #1 July 26, 2018 The Wheelhouse Page 19 CoaI, ` ';'�� - a, ..o-a,,-• Wei-r..y�c� do w' Am- Ali- 44� She P¢W cowmum i�? - be indudsd in'C�+ rAssign ,u«aw r .d - oq %t xe•,f Ea,mwrii 7 °e"��' WkAi SU,gC�.thnn4 do Hui a+ Mow • t Yd ,k 'F� PGASAK :Yam?,--�a..� -gf•�,cmx4u�r Wdws ;,.h5, -� I L4n(duN i q G d akV is C,k�.dl� iWM�J _ F+a a Co- �wl,.l SO w .�,�':`hl:..�'��.W ...+.p, •ewe•�4, � +i F cw C,�•�.�.wJr�ay. fa + 1.kmwvwr de+ 4 wX - �,,.hoq�lc wy*ra B.I/.f. R fuss �i wt1;�L Clafing" Wilmot Creek Secondary Plan Public Information Centre #1 Summary Wilmot Creek Secondary Plan Area, Y Wllmot Creek Community Thursday, July 26, 2016 7-00 — 9:00 pm The Wheelhouse— 1 Wheelhouse Drive, Newcastle Context — Proposal included an expansion to the existing Wilmot I, gy'CoN, I)AR 0 z�xrri� • Programs and facilities in the existing Wilmot Creek community are very important and in many cases are near or at capacity. • The security of residents in the existing community should be preserved and enhanced. The safety of existing and future residents needs to be given careful consideration, including the exploration of installing additional emergency exit routes. Existing infrastructure needs to be carefully studied to ensure there is adequate capacity for the new community as well as the existing community. • Upgrades to the existing bridge should be considered to ensure it is safe for all users, including pedestrians, cyclists, and individuals using mobility devices and golf carts. Page 20 Creek 0 Change in Ownership and Separate Community • During Phase One of the process Rice Development acquired the Phase 8 lands from CAPRI ET. • Proceeding with a stand-alone community, separate from the existing Wilmot Creek Community. • The new community will ensure appropriate transitions between the two communities, retain the gate to the existing community, offer a variety of housing types, including special needs housing, and neighbourhood retail. Page 21 lit �.C11\Dt�li� Secondary Plan Public Information Centre PIC #2 April 15, 2021 Jain us online or by phone on Thursday. April 1 5P Fran 6:3U p_rrt— B:3t1 p_rr-iar the second Public lalorrnation Centre (PIC) on the W ilmot Creek Secondary Plan. After reviewing feedback from PIC #1, and addroanal background work, an ending land use plan has been prepared. The land uses in this Secondary Pan area may include assisted lining facilities, affordable seniors housing_ a range of ha -sing types, parks. and some oxmmerdal uses. This Secondary Plan Area will be separate from the ex -sting Wilmot Creek oomnmmity. Public Information Centre #2 Date: Thursday, April 159 2021 Time 6:30 p.m. — 0:30 p.rn. Join us online: Visit wvrrr.darinmton.natYrilmotcreek before the meeting for the meeting link and inch wtians an how tm ion. Join by phone: On April 151h at 6:30 p-m. dial 547-374-405 and enter Meeting 10: 861 4178 GT76 - Par&*anf ft] is not reWkiLd Please join the us at the Publ is Information Centre to learn more about the project and share your ideas on the draft emerging plan. You can also falkar the project and share yow leedback online. The presentation and an online feedback form will be made avaieb[e after the PIC at wwdj.darinaton.ne- wilmotcreek. To get more information a join the project mailing list, email W ilinotCreekoZdaringinn.net ar contact Lisa Backus or Carlas Salazar at 90M23-3370. File Number. PLN 41.1 I lm KEY DIRECTIONS wilt Environment • Support a healthy, connected, and complete community with opporhmitles t for. - Amlx and variety of housing forms to provide for life cycle housing and affordability - Apedestria—Wid environment - Accessible and connected parks and active tmmltortalion network • A eighho Centre will act as the the gateway ffie to community. � • Maintain and Introduce view corridors to Lake Ontarlo. - • Opportunities for community gardening, 1] q EMERGING PLAN A^ Natural heritage system protected r Main access Q road, connection to east, second access to Bennett Rd Id 0 ` Parks along the main a Hi Comd V access road, linked park m 1 and trail system � Apartments focused along Hwy 401, transitioning to townhouses Neighbourhood Centre located at the entrance to the community, walking distance of residents 16 pi,nns< y", p[j)NUAW PIAN142 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION • Three Development Options were prepared based it on the key findings from the Phase 1 background work and technical reports. -_ e • A review was undertaken by the consulting team, the �M - Municipality, and the Technical Steering Committee to • identify the best elements or features from the three --• alternatives. 4 • The best elements were used to prepare a Draft Emerging Plan. LAND USES Medium Density Residential .._ G` Highand an Resi mend M Neighbourhood Commercial Parkland and Community Gardens V Buffer _ Exxii Wilmot / C :- Srormwater Management Creek Cpn pnayJ �EnvironmentalProtection PG� A ` y✓/ - 14.Om MTO Buffer - Roads MTO Lands Hydro Corridor - _ •••••• proposed Trail Network take Ontario 0��1W'2110 __._-..9ao.-..-40e W 700 to 1000 units - 1300 to 2000 population Overall Thoughts? Specific Likes? Suggested Refinements? Other? ~ • t I I.nNo uses dV• I t• Mealum l ialry R IdenAal - ...... -�� ��_—1 �NoOMet•haed Gernr„erci¢� .. q �....._�� � I... PsrFlentl end C.—iiry GeNens • slmnwamrrsereyemeM �r �wr� �-' —'-- — t• Environmen®I PrukrLon r• 14 do MT6 Buffer MTO8 r• ura rands nrdm cornaor Proposed Trail Network 0 QR miclo] a Oarington � " GpNB Secondary Plan Public Information Centre #2 Summary Secant" Men Area Study Area mimo� creme_ Size: 42 hectares (104 acres) Communky Location: South of Hwy. 401 Y East of Bennett Road North of CN Rail line and existing Wilmot Creek Community Thursday, April 15, 2021 6:30 — 8:30 pm Online and by phone via Zoom Context: Secondary Plan is to be SEPARATE from the existing Wilmot Creek IJ • Strong support for the proposed parkland including open green spaces and trails. • Mitigating the noise from the CN Railway will be important. • High -density development on the eastern edge should be carefully studied so as to not negatively impact the Environmental Protection area. • Ensure development does not increase stormwater runoff or erosion in the surrounding area. • The privacy and security of existing Wilmot Creek residents should be maintained. • Ensure adequate community services and facilities are provided for the Secondary Plan area residents. Community. Page 24 r� U Who Received Notice 0 • Landowners with the Study Area • Landowners/occupants around the Study Area • Interested Parties • Agencies • First Nations How was Notice Given • Newspaper • Mail • Email • Website • Twitter • Facebook Page 25 p,j)N 1AW PIANL� Uc7 Won Notice of Public Meeting The Municipality is seeking public comments on the draft Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan. After extensive consultation, the Municipality is ready to present and receive in put on the draft Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan and Sustainable Development Guidelines at a Statutory Public Meeting. This Secondary Plan is a Municipality of Clarington project. The draft Secondary Plan includes the lands south of Highway 401. east of Bennett Road, and north of the Canadian National Rail line. The Secondary Plan area is immediately north of the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan and Sustainable Development Guidelines tla not apply to the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. The purpose of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan (an" the implementing Official Plan Amendment) is to provide land use planning policies and design guidelines that will balance population growth, a variety of housing types, while protecting the natural environment and providing for a built environment that creates a safe, healthy and active neighborhood. The Secondary Plan will allow for the development of assisted living units as well as housing for seniors. Approxini 700-11 OD housing units can be accom mcclated in the Secondary Plan area. Staff are also seeking your input on the Draft Sustainable Development Guidelines Framework that have been prepared to advance the vision of this Secondary Plan. The Framework will outline how the Guidelines will Implement sustainablliry strategies that consider energy conservation, water use and management, mobility, buildings, open spaces and people to support a community that is resilient to the potential impacts of climate change. 0 k i - m . M.GMWAY 4-- --- ------- - � 5❑ I - c I �—SEkVjcp'gpgp_ M The proposed Official Plan Amendment, including additional ifOrmation and background studies, will be available for review at Clanngton.net(WilmotCreek beginning on October 51, 2021. Questions? Please contact Lisa Backus, Principal Planner at 905-623-3379, extension 2413, or by email at LBackusr�clarinaton.net or Sarah Parish, Planner II at 905423-3379 extension 2432 or by email at Soadsh9 darinaton net. Part 11 — Draft Secondary Plan & Sustainability GuidelinesvIA-� Page 26 yy;C[1NUAR 0 The policies of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan reflect three key themes: Environmental Sustainability — The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood will be developed to minimize impacts on the environment. Healthy, Complete Community — The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood will be a healthy, connected, and complete community which supports human well-being and active lifestyles Environmental Preservation — The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood will preserve and enhance environmental features Page 27 gy'CoN, I)AR 0 z�xrri� Vision statement < < The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood is envisioned as an environmentally sustainable and healthy community with liveable neighbourhoods, integrated and connected green spaces, efficient transportation and trails systems, and a vibrant commercial area. It is intended that the Secondary Plan Area will be a safe and inclusive pedestrian -oriented community that supports walkability and active living with accessible amenities. Guiding Principles • The Secondary Plan is based on nine guiding principles. Page 28 r� •'Ys tn 5 � .r � ��i — � � '� � • ar I is s���a�.,.' Uri "t-ir%le 114 ' W— IR .d n 1 F L7rinnir 14n �i tilAw r r� Jol d y,d - Ay Principle 5: Provide a Range of Housing Types and Opportunities for Affordable Housing. At Boom walking distance to 400m walking distance to higher order transit and a daily activities such as mixed use node transit, active parks, schools. and modest services ' 200m walking tlkstanoe to sub -neighbourhood local point such as a parkette Principle 6: Provide a mix of uses within walking distance. Page 31 r Principle 9: Promote Design Excellence. Page 33 91 ot Crept O,C[AR The Secondary Plan document includes policies under the following sections: Sustainability and Climate Change Natural Heritage Creating Vibrant Urban Places Encouraging Housing Diversity Celebrating Our Cultural Heritage Mobility and Roads Parks and Community Amenities Land Use Designations Servicing Page 34 Encourage green infrastructure to utilize the absorbing and filtering abilities of plants, trees, and soil. Increase tree cover with a variety of trees that are hardy, resilient, non-invasive, salt tolerant, drought resistant, and low maintenance. Mitigate heat island effects through green roofs, planting and preserving existing trees, and light coloured paving materials..f. Maximize potential for passive and active solar energy. Opportunities for local food production. Page 35 gy'CoN, I)AR 0 z�xrri� Environmental Protection • The biodiversity, ecological function, and connectivity of the natural heritage system shall be protected, restored, and improved. One crossing of Rickard Creek to minimize impacts, location will be confirmed by an EIS. Urban Forest and Native Plantings • Plant a diversity of tree species in parks and along rights -of -way to provide a healthy and more robust tree inventory. Use native plant species wherever possible. Page 36 0 Design a welcoming community that encourages and supports active living, social engagement, and the creation of a sense of place and well-being. Well -designed and high quality public realm that consists of public roads and parks and open spaces, and stormwater management facilities. ��d Ensure development in the private realm is compatible and sensitively integrated into its context by considering the mix of uses, building massing, height, scale, and architectural style. Page 37 rrn;�ON Provide a range of housing forms, unit sizes, and tenure to meet the needs of a diverse population and households of various sizes, incomes, and age compositions. Provide appropriate transitions in housing forms of various heights and densities. Includes live/work, accessory dwelling units, assisted and special needs, housing options for seniors. Page 38 4 yy;C[1NUAR ) Provide for a balanced transportation system that promotes active transportation facilities to encourage walking and cycling. Modified grid pattern of roads to support direct routes and movement of people and vehicles. Require a highly walkable community with an interconnected network of roads, sidewalks, and multi -use paths. Ensure ease of access, orientation, and safety for pedestrian, cyclists, and motor vehicles. Ensure existing residents have unimpeded access to their community. Page 39 Provide a diverse range of parks, open spaces, and community amenities to encourage residents to be physically active and socially engaged. Parks should be visible, accessible and accommodate a range of age groups. Parks system will include a Neighbourhood Park, Parkettes, and POP's. Located within walking distance of residents and along the major road system. Page 40 1 Natural heritage system protected mqw Main access road, second access to Bennett Rd. Protected entrance to existing community Parks along the main road, linked park and trail system Mix of residential dwelling types and special needs housing Apartments focused along Hwy 401, to create a visual and acoustic buffer f HighWaY 407 - - - - Hydro Corritlor 1 wamd1°"' � z e ` Existing Wilmat Creek Community LEGEND Q Secrrrdary Plan Bountlary BurferlOpen S.P I M E N Arterial Type C 0 Medium Dendly R-&rdbl 0 Environmental Prdedian r_ Collector Road _ High oerraay Resid—h.l ®SWimwaler Maregemerd Facilities Local Road _ Wighhaurhood Centre Green Sp— ____ Private Raad-Gordrolled AArrass _ Neighbourhood Park 0 MTO Lands ----- 3� Trail _ Parkettefcommunity Gardem Weser Course Neighbourhood Centre located at the entrance to the community, walking distance of residents Page 41 IC Hydw Corritlor Schedule A LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Medium Density Residential - Permits townhouses, stacked townhouses, special needs housing, and low rise apartment buildings. Min. 2 storeys; max. 6 storeys in height. LEGEND Schedule A Q Secondary Plan Boundary BufferlOpen Sapce 1 ■ ■ I Artedal Type C Medium Density Residential Emronmental Protection Colletlor Road LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, TRANSPORTATION,[) _ High Stormwater Managemenl Facilities .... Local ROMPARKS AND OPEN SPACE _ Neighbourhood Centre Green Space =__= Private Raad-Cmh.lied Aecess _ Neighborhood Park; MTO lanes -4 Trail Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood _ ParmitelCommwiry Gardens water course Page 42 Secondary Plan �irrn;�n�R, 0 i ;l t .141 High Density Residential — Permits apartment buildings and special needs housing. Min. 6 storeys; max. 8 storeys in height. Located adjacent to Hwy. 401 and Rickard Creek. LtGt=NU Schedule A QSecondary Plan Boundary C BuHerlOpen Said- Aderal Tyra C 0 Medium Oeneay Residential j Environmental Protection r_ Collector Road LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, _ High Density Residential Managemenl Faeildies - - - - Local Road PARKS AND OPEN SPACE _ Neighbourhood Centre Green Space =__= Pdvate Road -Controlled Access Neighbourhood Park _' MTO Lands —* Trail Will Creek Neighbourhood _Parkette/Community Gardens F-� Water Course Page 43 Secondary Plan ��t Cxee� �irrn;�n�R, r cJp :. r l+ r A� Neighbourhood Centre - Provides opportunities for commercial and residential uses that benefit from frontage along Bennett Road. Permits live/work, mixed use buildings, commercial retail and service use buildings, and grocery store. Min. 2 storeys; max. 6 storeys in height. milli 1eoll NoiI LLUi Schedule A Q Secondary Plan Boundary BufferlOpen Sapce 1 ■ ■ I Artedal Type C Medium Density Residential Emronmental Protection r_ Golletlor Road LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, TRANSPORTATION,[) _ High Stormwater Managemenl Facilities .... Local ROMPARKS AND OPEN SPACE _ Neighbourhood Centre Green Space =__= Private Raad-Cmh.lied Aecess _ Neighborhood Park; MTO lanes -4 Trail Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood ParkartelCommwiry Gardens water course Page 44 Secondary Plan rrn;�ON New guideline document that will be Appended to the Secondary Plan. The Municipality has committed to pursuing a sustainable future. Official Plan recognizes that sustainable design contributes to community and environmental health, a high quality of life, and climate change mitigation and preparedness. The purpose of the Sustainability Guidelines is to expand on Priority Green and define sustainability priorities specific to the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Development. Page 45 rrn;�ON One Planet Living (OPL) The Sustainability Guidelines will utilize the OPL framework as an outline to structure its sustainability principles and strategies. One Planet Living is a flexible tool without preassigned credits or prerequisites. Provides developers and community builders with a framework to reduce the negative environmental and social impacts associated with the way we design, build, and interact with our communities. Page 46 Sustainable Priority - Water This section will provide guidance on green infrastructure, stormwater management, building practices, etc.. Guidelines will be provided for: Water Quality Stormwater Runoff Irrigation Rainwater Management Native, Drought Tolerant Plants Building Water Efficiency Water Metering gy'CoN, I)AR ) z�xrri� -Ot Crept yj;C[1�111AR For each sustainability priority, the Sustainability Guidelines will outline both `Mandatory' and `Voluntary' performance measures. Sustainable Water Pertrance Measum iPrIority Ala r�at�r�r �� Id.J ntar� Rainwater Management I n a manner best Achieve 850' percen6le replicafing natural s to hydrology presses, retain (k-e. , rr filtrate. evapotranspirate, or collect and re -use) -an-site the runoff from the deuabped site for, at minimum, the 801' percentile of regional or local rainfall even is using low -impact d eve Ie p me rat (LID) and green infrastpu re (01) faUices. Native, Drought -Tolerant Native, -drought-tolerant 100 of the I a nd soa peo P1 ants plants used f-or % -of the area landseapea $ • Housing Type Percentage Split — will the SP specify the percentages for each housing type such as affordable housing, market value, seniors, assisted living. • Rickard Creek Crossing — How will the feature be protected and could the lands could be retained as natural instead of development? • Inappropriate location — development for seniors in this location was inappropriate given the proximity to the Highway 401, the railway tracks and the high voltage power lines. Development will result in endless noise complaints. • Construction practices — dust and noise suppression is a must. Access to Wilmot Creek must be maintained. Utility interruptions should not occur. • Recreation Facilities — new development area must have its own recreation facilities as the Wheelhouse is for Wilmot residents only. • Train Whistle Cessation — frustration that the Municipality is spending so much money on the issue; policy should be included to require the builder pay for the whistle cessation. • Bennett Road, South Service/Lake Road, 401 Ramps intersection — increased traffic with recent improvements to the area, need for traffic signals. Page 49 Part III — Next Steps . -61 e All� Page 50 ot Crept yrC[1 DAR • Consider public and agency comments • Revise the Official Plan Amendment and � Secondary Plan based on feedback received � • Complete the draft Sustainability Guidelines and post for public and agency comment • Revise the supporting technical documents � • Prepare Recommendation Report � • Forward to Region of Durham for Approval • Draft Zoning By-law to implement . Page 51 Thank you! Clarington Public Meeting Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Joint Committees Date of Meeting: October 25, 2021 Report Number: PDS-052-21 Submitted By: Ryan Windle, Director of Planning and Development Services File Number: COPA2021-0005 (PLN 41.1) Resolution#: Report Subject: Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Purpose of Report: The purpose of this report is to provide information to the public and Council. It does not constitute, imply or request any degree of approval. Recommendations: 1. That Report PDS-052-21 be received; 2. That the proposed Secondary Plan and Official Plan Amendment (COPA 2021- 0005) continue to be reviewed and processed; 3. That staff report back to Council with a Recommendation Report; and 4. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-052-21 and any delegations be advised of Council's direction regarding this Public Meeting report. Page 53 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Report Overview Page 2 This report provides an overview of the planning process for the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan, the Planning Policy framework in which the Secondary Plan has been developed, and public and agency comments received to date. The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood is envisioned as an environmentally sustainable and healthy community, with integrated and connected green spaces, efficient transportation and trail systems, and a vibrant commercial area. It is intended that the neighbourhood will be a safe and inclusive pedestrian -oriented community that supports walkability and active living with accessible amenities. The purpose of the statutory public meeting is to obtain comments from the public, landowners, and commenting agencies on the proposed Secondary Plan and Sustainable Development Guidelines. 1. Background — Secondary Plans 1.1 The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan and Sustainable Development Guidelines provide more detail than the Official Plan about how a neighbourhood is to develop. This neighbourhood scale planning allows for a more detailed analysis of land use and transportation issues and specific ways to achieve the objectives of the Clarington Official Plan, including meeting density targets. 1.2 The Secondary Plan also provides the structure for the various components of the neighbourhood, such as how to best provide locations for housing, commercial, and parks and amenities, as well as planning the mobility between them and the rest of the community at large. Ultimately, a Secondary Plan establishes the character and identity of the neighbourhood while promoting efficient land use and development. 1.3 The preparation of this Secondary Plan follows the same procedures as an Official Plan Amendment under the Planning Act. This includes the preparation of supporting technical studies, public engagement, notice and holding of public meetings and adoption procedures. The Region of Durham is the final approval authority for Secondary Plans. 2. Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan 2.1 The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan area is located south of Highway 401 and north of the Canadian National (CN) rail line and the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. Its westerly boundary is Bennett Road and the interchange for Highway 35/115 forms the easterly boundary. The area for the Secondary Plan is approximately 42 hectares (104 acres) in size. Of that total, approximately one third of the area contains natural features, a hydro transmission line easement, and Ministry of Transportation (MTO) lands. Page 54 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Page 3 2.2 Wilmot Creek Drive, the road into the existing Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood traverses the Secondary Plan Area. There are three landowners in the Secondary Plan Area; two have developable lands, Rice Development Corporation and Douglas Humphrey, who are represented by Rice Development Corporation. The third landowner is Hydro One Networks Inc. (Figure 1). Figure 1: Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Area 2.3 The Secondary Plan area consists of: Wilmot Creek Drive, agricultural fields, a baseball diamond [used by the Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community (Wilmot Creek Community)], the Wilmot Creek Community sales office and the access gate to the Wilmot Creek Community. 3. Initiation of the Secondary Plan Original Application (2003) 3.1 In 2002, a Durham Regional Official Plan Amendment application was submitted to incorporate the subject lands into the Newcastle Village Urban Area in order to develop the next phase of the Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. 3.2 In October 2003, a corresponding application was submitted to amend the Clarington Official Plan to incorporate the subject lands into the Newcastle Village Urban Area. Since a local (Clarington) Official Plan Amendment cannot proceed ahead of an upper tier (Region of Durham) Official Plan Amendment, the Clarington application was put on hold. 3.3 Further consideration of the Regional Official Plan Amendment application was put on hold following the introduction of the Provincial Growth Plan in 2005, and the beginning of the Region of Durham's Official Plan Review. Page 55 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Page 4 3.4 In June of 2009, Regional Official Plan Amendment 128 adopted changes to the Durham Regional Official Plan which incorporated the subject lands into the Newcastle Village Urban Area. Amendment 128 was subsequently approved by the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) in January of 2013. Application Restart (2014) 3.5 In 2014, Rice Development Group restarted their 2003 Official Plan Amendment application for the expansion of the Newcastle Village Urban Boundary. By January 2015, an application, including numerous supporting studies, was submitted. A statutory public meeting was held in March 2015. This was followed by numerous meetings between Staff, the developer (Rice Development Group), owner/operator of Wilmot Creek Lifestyle Community (CapREIT), Douglas Humphrey, the Wilmot Creek Homeowners Association and Wilmot Creek residents. The Wilmot Creek Homeowners Association made a submission to the Official Plan Amendment application outlining their concerns with the development proposal. 3.6 In June 2016, Rice Development Group appealed the Official Plan Amendment application to the OMB in respect to Clarington Council's failure to decide on the application. A settlement was reached regarding the Official Plan Amendment which was approved by the OMB in 2017. Of particular note is that both parties agreed to advance the Secondary Planning process as set out in Official Plan Amendment 107 once the amendment was approved by the Region of Durham. 3.7 On November 9t", 2017, Planning and Development Services received a letter from Rice Development Group. The letter requested initiation of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan process and committed to funding the entirety of the project. Staff Report PSD-086-17 outlining the proposed planning process, Terms of Reference, and the composition of the steering committee then proceeded to a Special Planning and Development Committee Meeting on December 4t", 2017. The report was ratified by Council on December 11 t", 2017. 3.8 Although the Municipality ultimately manages and directs the Secondary Plan process, the Terms of Reference included a Steering Committee to provide overall guidance and feedback to Municipal Staff. The Steering Committee includes Municipal, Region of Durham, and Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) Staff, a representative from the Wilmot Creek Homeowner's Association, a landowner representative, and the lead Consultant for the Municipality. Unique to this Secondary Plan project is a third -party facilitator, Swerhun & Associates, to lead the public consultation process. 3.9 As noted in the Terms of Reference for the Secondary Plan, the goal is to address these five Council priorities: Sustainability and Climate Change 3.9.1 Sustainable development principles and practices will be incorporated into every part of the Secondary Plan, including the design of neighbourhoods and the allocation of Page 56 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Page 5 land uses. The Secondary Plan, Sustainable Development Guidelines, Zoning By-law and related studies will include measurable targets to move towards a net zero community. Excellence in Urban Design 3.9.2 New neighborhoods should be designed to enhance the history and character of Clarington. New neighbourhoods are to be created with a sense of place and all development should result in a high -quality aesthetic and design. Excellence in urban design will consider elements like building design, complete streets, views, park connectivity, sun and shadow impacts, and active transportation as well as the integration of green infrastructure into neighborhood design. Affordable Housing 3.9.3Through Official Plan policy, Clarington Council supports the provision of a variety of housing types, tenure and costs for people of all ages, abilities and income groups. This Secondary Plan reflects this policy as well as recommendations found in Clarington's Affordable Housing Toolkit. Through this policy this Plan demonstrates how it contributes to meeting Council's affordable housing target. Community Engagement 3.9.4 Clarington Council is committed to community consultation and engagement beyond the statutory requirements. The preparation of this Secondary Plan was and continues to be supported by a thorough public engagement strategy which includes a range of public consultation initiatives in order to share, consult, deliberate and collaborate with all stakeholders. These efforts are in addition to any statutory meeting requirements. Coordination of Initiatives 3.9.5In recently initiated Secondary Plans, the coordination of initiatives has been identified as a Council Priority that is to be addressed. This usually includes coordination with an Environmental Assessment or a Subwatershed Study, however there are no other initiatives for this project to coordinate with. 4. The Secondary Plan Planning Process — Three Phases 4.1 There are three stages to the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan process (Figure 2). As provided in the draft Terms of Reference and further refined through the tender and award process, our lead Consultant, The Planning Partnership has summarized the planning process for this Secondary Plan into three phases. Page 57 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Phase 1 Phase 1 Technical Technical Analysis Analysis Phase 2 Development Concept Page 6 Phase 3 Council Decision Figure 2: Three Stages of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Process Phase 1: Analysis of Background Information and Preliminary Development Proposals 4.2 The initial phase involved a detailed technical analysis of background information and creating a preliminary development proposal. Phase 2: Proposed Development Concept 4.3 Based upon the results of Phase 1, the consulting team prepared a development concept with a demonstration plan. Phase 3: Proposed Secondary Plan and Zoning By -Law Amendment for Statutory Public Meeting and Council Approval 4.4 The project is currently in Phase three of the project. 4.5 The following sections will generally describe the process that was undertaken to develop the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan. This process is in addition to the process already described in Section 3 during the initiation of the project. A sequence of events summary table is provided in Attachment 1 for reference. Phase 1 - Analysis of Background Information and Preliminary Development Proposal 4.6 The initial phase of the project involved a detailed technical analysis of background information, initial public participation, and a preliminary development proposal. Page 58 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Public Information Centre — PIC #1 Page 7 4.7 The first Public Information Centre (PIC) was held July 261", 2018. The initial PIC was to introduce the public to the re -initiated project by defining the study area, the projects process, and the study priorities. Approximately 400 people attended the meeting which included landowners, individuals who expressed interest in the project, Council members, and the steering committee members. 4.8 The PIC was advertised in the Orono Times and Clarington This Week in the two weeks preceding the meeting, a notice was also posted on the Municipality's website. All residents within the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community received a copy of the PIC notice as well as all landowners within 120 metres of the Secondary Plan area. 4.9 The PIC attendees were interested in learning how the development of a new community would be integrated with the existing community. There was significant concern as the population growth within that area may place an even greater stress on already strained programs and facilities, if integration was to take place. 4.10 A PIC #1 summary report was prepared, and it is available on the project webpage. Background Studies 4.11 Detailed background studies were also completed during Phase 1 of the study. These studies included the following: • Existing Environmental and Geomorphological Conditions Report; • Air Quality Assessment; • Archaeological Assessment; • GeotechnicalInvestigation; • Traffic Impact Study — Existing Conditions Assessment; • Noise and Vibration Study; • Active Transportation Analysis; • Water and Wastewater Servicing Plan; • Floodplain Analysis and Stormwater Management Plan; • Landscape Analysis; • Sustainability Background Report; • Urban Design Analysis; and a • Hydrogeological Investigation and Water Balance Study. 4.12 In keeping with Council's Priority for the Co-ordination of Initiatives, management of the consulting teams and the background studies that the landowner had already undertaken in support of their private Official Plan Amendment Application (described in Sections 3.5- 3.8) was taken over by the Municipality's consulting team. This approach was beneficial as we were able to use the information that had already been collected instead of duplicating Page 59 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Page 8 efforts and increasing project costs. As well it ensured that the reports were well co- ordinated with the new reports being prepared and in keeping with the project's objectives. 4.13 Several of these studies such as the EIS, Air Quality Assessment, and Archaeological Assessment documented the updated conditions within the Secondary Plan area, whereas others, such as the Green Development Guidelines focused on trends and best practices that will influence the policies. A summary of the Background Studies is provided in Attachment 2. 4.14 A Phase 1 Summary Report has been prepared and is available for review on the project webpage. 4.15 A Project Update Newsletter (#1) was posted to the project webpage in April 2019. Phase 2 — Proposed Development Concept Proposed Development Concept 4.16 Based upon the results of Phase 1 and leading up to PIC#2, the Consultant prepared three preliminary land use options for the Secondary Plan area. These concepts were discussed and evaluated by the Steering Committee. Based on the feedback from the Steering Committee, which included the landowners, an emerging land use option was prepared. 4.17 The COVID-19 pandemic was declared in March 2020 as the project was in Phase 2. Although Municipal Staff and the Consultants were no longer working from their respective offices, the Secondary Plan project continued. Virtual steering committee meetings, agency communication and replying to landowner and public questions has continued. 4.18 A Project Update Newsletter was published in April 2021. The purpose of this Newsletter was to provide the community with an update about the project and to advise them of next steps. Two significant updates were provided: a) The Secondary Plan Area was to be developed as a stand along community separate from the existing Wilmot Creek Community; and b) That Rice Development Corporation has acquired the former Wilmot Creek Phase 8 Lands for CapREIT. Public Information Centre — PIC #2 4.19 The second Public Information Centre (PIC) was held April 19th, 2021. The meeting provided individuals with a project update and aimed to share and seek feedback on the Emerging Plan for the Secondary Plan area. The meeting was held online and by phone following directives from Public Health to practice physical distancing and reduce the spread of COVID-19. Page 60 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Page 9 4.20 Approximately 100 people joined the meeting, which included a land acknowledgement, welcoming remarks, project update, presentation of the Emerging Plan for the Secondary Plan area and a facilitated discussion. 4.21 The PIC was advertised in the Orono Times and Clarington This Week in the two weeks preceding the meeting, as well as on the Municipal website and through social media. Landowners within 120 metres of the Secondary Plan Area in the Urban Area, and those landowners within 300 metres of the Secondary Plan Area outside of the Urban Area received the Notice for PIC #2. In addition to the newspaper advertisements, the project updates and PIC information was announced in the Planning eUpdate. 4.22 All residents within the Wilmot Creek Community and the projects Interested Parties list were given Notice of the meeting. 4.23 Following PIC#2 a draft PIC summary was created by the facilitators and shared with all participants in the meeting. Comments and revisions to the draft PIC summary were addressed as necessary and a final PIC#2 Summary was posted to the Project Webpage. 4.24 In addition to the PIC#2 Summary Document, a copy of the presentation material and a video recording, with subtitles, of the PIC are posted to the Project Webpage. 4.25 Following PIC#2, the Municipality launched an online survey to generate additional feedback. Unfortunately, although the engagement tools were available for approximately a month only a handful of people participated. Phase 3 — Current Phase - Proposed Secondary Plan and Zoning By -Law Amendment for Statutory Public Meeting and Council Approval 4.26 The intent of Phase 3 of the Secondary Plan process is to focus on the finalization of the Secondary Plan. This includes the Statutory Public Meeting and Recommendation Report to Council for Adoption. In this phase, the supporting technical documents will be finalized, and the preparation of the implementing zoning by-law will take place. We are currently in Phase 3 of the process. 4.27 The Statutory Public Meeting provides the opportunity for the public to formally comment on the draft Official Plan Amendment, the draft Secondary Plan (including Land Use Plan) and the Sustainable Development Guidelines. It is important to note, that any comments received, either during the Public Meeting verbally, or submitted in writing to staff, since the release of the draft Official Plan Amendment and Secondary Plan, will be recorded in the Recommendation Report. Notice - Statutory Public Meeting 4.28 Notice for the Statutory Public Meeting for the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan was provided in accordance with the Planning Act. The Public Meeting Notice was provided to: Page 61 Municipality of Clarington Page 10 Report PDS-052-21 a. landowners within 120m (in the Urban Area) and within 300 metres (in the rural area) of the Secondary Plan Area; b. over 300 people on the Interested parties list; c. all residences within the Wilmot Creek Community d. the Region of Durham, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and all other commenting agencies; and e. First Nations representatives. 4.29 Rice Development Corporation staff also posted three Public Meeting notice signs on the lands. Two signs were posted on the Bennett Road frontage, one south of the CN rail line and one north of the CN rail line and one sign was posted on Wilmot Creek Drive. 4.30 The draft Secondary Plan, draft Land Use Plan and the Draft Sustainable Development Guidelines Framework were posted to the project webpage by October 5t", 2021 in accordance with the Planning Act requirements. 4.31 The Communications Department at the Municipality has promoted the Public Meeting and posted the Notice on the Municipal Website, Facebook and Twitter. Notices advertising the Public Meeting were placed in Clarington This Week and the Orono Times for three weeks preceding the Public Meeting. 4.32 The Notice of Statutory Public Meeting noted that the materials (draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Secondary Plan) would be available for review October 5t", 2021. 4.33 In addition to receiving a Notice of Public Meeting, external agencies and internal departments have been requested to provide their comments regarding the Draft Secondary Plan and the Draft Sustainable Development Guidelines. These comments, as well as Council and the publics' will be addressed when staff prepare the Recommendation Report. 5. The Draft Official Plan Amendment, Secondary Plan, and the Sustainable Development Guidelines Draft Official Plan Amendment (Attachment 3) 5.1 The purpose of this amendment is to add the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan to the Clarington Official Plan. This Secondary Plan, including the Sustainable Development Guidelines will facilitate the development of an inclusive, liveable, and sustainable community Page 62 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Draft Secondary Plan (Attachment 4) Page 11 5.2 The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan will serve as the foundation for the creation of a new community with its own character and sense of identity while also creating a place that fits into the surrounding community. Approximately 700-1100 housing units can be accommodated in the Secondary Plan Area resulting in approximately 1500 residents. It will create an environmentally sustainable and healthy community with liveable neighbourhoods, integrated and connected green spaces, efficient transportation and trail systems, and a vibrant commercial area. It will also be a safe and inclusive pedestrian - oriented community that supports walkability and active living with accessible amenities. 5.3 The policies reflect key themes for the area to support an environmentally sustainable neighbourhood that preserves the natural environment, provides a diversity of housing options, connected green spaces, and an area with a mix of uses. 5.4 The transportation network serving the Secondary Plan Area will be designed with complete streets principles to accommodate multiple modes of travel such as motorists, transit users, cyclists, and pedestrians. Prioritize active modes of transportation and the needs of the most vulnerable users. 5.5 The land use designations in Figure 3 below, and the Secondary Plan policies are designed to establish a distribution of land uses to ensure an appropriate mix of uses, heights, and densities in a manner which supports the creation of a sustainable and complete community. (Attachment 5) Page 63 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Page 12 41 d 13 a . �,, LU z ❑ CS q Q q C3 L`, o W U Q Q ~ U LiSul a n bpt� I- o a�Q d i Q p Ir Z N v N FL w 0) p �1 ❑ Q4t� a 0 z e Q❑�Q�� �� �� o i 13 °z � is QCi ad O�aE3 a.' � o ° x E W U a �Ltvral7� Q, ff, � Iffff i L = C _ O p YO 0❑LJ L-�. J[ m W w 6 '1 V m�an� Y tp = Z n= z z a ■ P ate■ s _—------- -`� w eo «auua Figure 3: Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Land Use Map Page 64 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Page 13 5.6 The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan area includes the following land use designations: • High Density Residential; • Medium Density Residential; • Neighbourhood Centre; • Environmental Protection Area; and • Green Space. 5.7 Taller buildings will generally be located in close proximity to Highway 401 and Bennett Road, a major Arterial Road. Development lots shall back onto the provincial highway and front onto a local internal street. Rear yards shall back onto the provincial highway. High Density development is also located across the Rickard Creek. 5.8 Generally, each land use designation described above includes specific policies about building types that are permitted, any additional land uses include specific directions for minimum heights and densities. Direction is provided regarding Parks and Trails. The Secondary Plan also includes a sustainable development and urban design policies. 5.9 The Secondary Plan also includes an Environmental Protection Area which is associated with the Rickard Creek, it's valley and a wetland. The delineation of the boundary of lands designated as Environmental Protection Area are approximate and shall be detailed through appropriate studies prepared as part of the review of development applications in accordance with the policies of this Secondary Plan and the Clarington Official Plan. Policies in the Secondary Plan require that the parks and trails system connect to natural areas. 5.10 The Official Plan sets out clear intentions and expectations to promote great streets and public spaces, high quality architecture, and sustainable development. These principles are included throughout the Secondary Plan. Sustainable Development Guidelines 5.11 The purpose of the Sustainable Development Guidelines (Sustainability Guidelines — Attachment 6) is to expand on Priority Green and define sustainability priorities specific to the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Development. At this time, a Framework, or summary of the intended content of the Sustainability Guidelines has been prepared. 5.12 The Sustainable Development Guidelines, when completed, will provide direction and measurable targets for building and site design to support the Secondary Plan policy framework. Generally, for each sustainability priority the Guidelines will outline both a mandatory and a voluntary performance measure. Page 65 Municipality of Clarington Page 14 Report PDS-052-21 5.13 Following the Statutory Public Meeting and receipt of input from the community, council and the commenting agencies regarding the draft Secondary Plan and draft Land Use Plan, a full draft of the Sustainability Guidelines will be prepared. The Sustainability Guidelines will be posted to the project webpage for review and comment. It will also be sent to the Steering Committee, the interested parties list and the commenting agencies for their review and comment. 5.14 While the Sustainable Development Guidelines are intended as a reference, they indicate the Municipality of Clarington's expectations with respect to the character, quality and form of development in the Secondary Plan area. The guidelines also provide the Municipality with an objective, consistent evaluation framework to assess future development applications. 6. Conformity with Provincial Plans Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 6.1 The Provincial Policy Statement 2020 (PPS) provides policy direction on land use planning and development for matters of provincial interest. This includes the protection of Provincial resources, public health and safety, and the quality of the natural and built environment. These objectives are to be achieved through efficient land use planning. Through land use designations and policies, municipal official plans and Secondary Plans are the most important vehicle for implementing the PPS. 6.2 In keeping with the PPS, the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan will lead to a new neighborhood that includes a mix of housing, including affordable housing, employment, recreation, parks and open spaces, and different modes of transportation choices that increase the use of active transportation. The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 6.3 The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 2019 (Growth Plan) provides guidance on where and how to grow within the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH). This includes requiring Municipalities to maintain a three-year supply of serviced land for residential development. 6.4 Building on the direction of the PPS, the Growth Plan supports the achievement of complete communities, a thriving economy, a clean and healthy environment, and social equity. These goals will be achieved by including a range of housing types, a complete street network, a variety of parks, a trail system, and retail/commercial amenities within walking distance of residents. 6.5 Complete communities aim to meet the needs of everyone within the community, no matter their stature. This includes providing a range of housing types. To address the issue of housing affordability the Growth Plan provides direction for a range and mix of housing to be offered with a priority on access to transit and amenities. Page 66 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 7. Official Plans Durham Regional Official Plan Page 15 7.1 The Durham Region Official Plan designated the lands as "Living Areas" in Schedule `A' Regional Structures. The Region's Official Plan states that Living Areas should accommodate the widest possible variety of housing types, sizes, and tenure to provide living accommodations that address various socio-economic factors. Living Areas should be developed with compact built forms through higher density development and consider support and access for public transit, but be predominantly used for housing purposes, with limited office and retail in appropriate locations. Policies in the proposed Secondary Plan locate the highest intensity of development and greatest mix of uses along the Highway 401 corridor and in the Neighbourhood Centre to foster access to commercial amenities and transit. In addition, policies have also been included to support the Region and Clarington Council's desire to provide affordable housing units within this Secondary Plan area and throughout Clarington. 7.2 The implementation of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan shall ensure sequential and orderly development, that the servicing of the area is on full municipal water and sanitary sewer systems; that there is transportation for all modes available; that a range of housing is provided; and that there is a diverse mix of land uses, amongst others. It is acknowledged that the Municipality will work with the landowners and the Regional Municipality of Durham to develop a plan for the phasing of extensions to the existing services within the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Area. Clarington Official Plan 7.3 The Clarington Official Plan (OP) provides a vision for the future growth and development of the Municipality to the year 2031, in conformity with the Regional Official Plan and the Growth Plan, and consistent with the PPS. It also provides direction on fostering the economic, environmental, cultural, physical and social wellbeing of the residents of Clarington. The most recent Clarington OP was adopted in November 2016 and approved by the Region of Durham in June 2017. 7.4 The OP designated the lands in this area as Urban Residential, Environmental Protection, and Municipal Park. 7.5 The Urban Residential designation shall predominantly be used for housing purposes, providing for a variety of densities, tenure and types. Neighbourhoods are to be walkable, compact, connected and create a high -quality public realm. The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan ensures a broad range of housing types in the community with its varied housing densities and flexible built forms. The Sustainable Development Guidelines and policies will also ensure that the mix of heights encouraged throughout the community is compatible with adjacent homes. The Secondary Plan includes affordable housing and will aid in achieving a meaningful percentage of affordable housing that supports the Municipality's broad target. Page 67 Municipality of Clarington Page 16 Report PDS-052-21 7.6 The Environmental Protection Areas are recognized as a significant component of the Municipality's natural environment and their ecological functions are to be conserved and protected. This Plan envisions development that maintains, restores and creates continuous green corridors and valley lands. The policy framework in the Secondary Plan is aligned with OP policies and will be updated in accordance with future recommendations. 7.7 The land designated Green Space is also a significant component to the Municipality's natural environment. Lands designated Green Space in the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan shall be used primarily for conservation and low intensity recreational uses. 7.8 Official Plan Chapter 16 — Special Policy Areas identifies the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood as a Special Policy Area B. The policies in this section divide the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood into two parts, B1, the existing Wilmot Creek Community and B2, the Secondary Plan area lands. 7.9 Policy 16.3.7 of the Official Plan requires that the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan to be prepared. Priority Green 7.10 The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan policies were developed with regard for sustainability, taking into consideration the goals of Priority Green Clarington. The Wilmot Creek Sustainability Background Report and the Sustainable Development Guidelines to be appended to the Secondary Plan will guide sustainable development in the Secondary Plan Area. 8. Public Comments 8.1 Preparation of the Wilmot Creek Secondary Plan has been guided by feedback received from stakeholders and the public. Prior to the release of the draft Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan the project team held two Public Information Centres (PICs) to introduce the process the Municipality is undertaking to develop a Secondary Plan and to share and seek feedback on the emerging plan. Key themes from the comments received during and after the PICs are summarized below. More detailed summaries are available online on the project website at www.clarington.net/wilmotcreek. 8.2 PIC #1 Comments (Context: Secondary Plan was to be an extension the existing Wilmot Creek Community) • Programs and facilities in the existing Wilmot Creek community (the area south of the Secondary Plan area) are very important and in many cases are near or at capacity. • Integrating the new community with the existing community is a significant concern as it may place greater stress on already strained programs and facilities. Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Page 17 • The security of residents in the existing community should be preserved and enhanced. • The safety of existing and future residents needs to be given careful consideration, including the exploration of installing additional emergency exit routes. • Existing infrastructure needs to be carefully studied to ensure there is adequate capacity for the new community as well as the existing community. • Upgrades to the existing bridge should be considered to ensure it is safe for all users, including pedestrians, cyclists, and individuals using mobility devices and golf carts. • The existing baseball diamond is an important facility and should be maintained or replaced. 8.3 PIC #2 Comments (Context: Secondary Plan is to be separate from the existing Wilmot Creek Community) • Mitigating the noise from the trains on the CN Railway will be important for existing residents of Wilmot Creek and future residents in the Secondary Plan. • Strong support for the proposed parkland in the Secondary Plan area, including open greenspaces and trails. • The proposed high -density development on the eastern edge of the Secondary Plan area should be carefully studied and considered to ensure it does not negatively impact the Environmental Protection area. • Ensure development of the Secondary Plan area does not increase stormwater runoff or erosion in the surrounding area. • The privacy and security of existing Wilmot Creek residents should be maintained. • Ensure adequate community services and facilities are provided for residents of the Secondary Plan area and the surrounding communities. 8.4 Since advertising for the Statutory Public Meeting staff have received a number of comments from the public. Comments received include: • Train Whistle Cessation — the submission expressed frustration that the Municipality is spending so much money on the issue; suggested the plan should include a policy that recommends the builder pay for the whistle cessation and pay the Municipality back, and the resident stated that developers are profiting and its time they give back to the local residents and support the communities they are building. • Housing Type Percentage Split — the submission inquired if the Secondary Plan would specify the percentages for each housing type such as affordable housing, market value, seniors, assisted living. Page 69 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Page 18 • Rickard Creek Crossing — the submission inquired if the crossing of the Rickard Creek with utilities, roads etc., without destroying the natural environment been figured out yet? And wanted to know if the lands could be retained as natural instead of development. • Inappropriate location — the submission identified that development for seniors in this location was inappropriate given the proximity to the Highway 401, the railway tracks and the high voltage power lines. Expressed development would result in endless noise complaints. • Construction practices — Dust and noise suppression is a must. Access to Wilmot Creek must be maintained without frequent interruptions. Utility interruptions should not occur. • Recreation Facilities — new development area must have its own recreation facilities as the Wheelhouse is for Wilmot residents only. 9. Agency and Departmental Comments 9.1 Notice of Statutory Public Meeting and the request for comments was provided to the Agencies in early October. Agencies normally require a minimum of four weeks to provide comments on large documents such as a Secondary Plan. At the time of writing this report staff have not received any agency comments. 9.2 Region of Durham Planning and Public Works staff, CLOCA Planning and Engineering staff, Clarington Planning and Public Works staff and recently the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board staff, are members of the Secondary Plan steering committee. These staff have been integral to the process, including providing direction on the technical/background reports and early land use concepts. 9.3 Staff will prepare a recommendation report following the receipt of all agency comments regarding the Secondary Plan and the outstanding technical/background reports. The recommendation report will include a summary of comments received and how they have been addressed. 10. Concurrence Not Applicable. 11. Conclusion Clarington Next Steps 11.1 The purpose of this report is to provide background information and a status update for the Public Meeting on the draft Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan and Guidelines. Staff will continue to process and prepare a subsequent recommendation report. Page 70 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-052-21 Page 19 11.2 Following the Statutory Public Meeting, the draft documents will be further revised as deemed necessary based on the comments received. Concurrently, the team will begin preparing the implementing zoning by-law. A recommended version of the Secondary Plan and Sustainable Development Guidelines and an implementing Zoning By-law will be presented to Council in the future. 11.3 When adopted, the Official Plan Amendment will be forwarded to the Region of Durham for approval. Part of the Region of Durham review includes circulation of the Amendment to agencies and the Province for their comments. The Region will issue a Notice of Decision regarding the Amendment and the 20-day appeal period will commence. If there are no appeals to the Region about the approved OPA it will come into full force and effect. Staff Contacts: Lisa Backus, Principal Planner, 905-623-3379 extension 2413 or Ibackus(o).clarington.net, Sarah Parish, Planner II, 905-623-3379 extension 2432 or sparish(a clarington.net., or Carlos Salazar, Manager of Community Planning and Design, 905- 623-3379 extension 2409 or csalazar aj�clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Sequence of Events Attachment 2 — Summary of Background Reports Attachment 3 — Draft Official Plan Amendment Attachment 4 — Draft Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Attachment 5 — Draft Schedule A Land Use Plan Attachment 6 — Draft Sustainable Development Guidelines Framework Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 71 Attachment 1 to Report PDS-052-21 Sequence of Events Summary — Wilmot Creek Secondary Plan 2017 Event November 2017 Request received to initiate the Wilmot Creek Secondary Plan December 2017 Wilmot Creek Secondary Plan Initiated Special Planning and Development Committee Public Meeting 2018 Event July 2018 Consultants Engaged by the Municipality July 2018 Steering Committee Meeting #1 July 26, 2018 Public Information Centre #1 December 2018 Rice Development Group purchases majority of Secondary Plan area. Secondary Plan will no longer be an extension of the Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community December 2018 Landowner, Consultants, Staff meeting 2019 Event April 2019 Newsletter #1 Project Update June 2019 Steering Committee Meeting #2 November 2019 Landowner, Consultant, Municipal Staff Meeting December 2019 Steering Committee Meeting #3 2020 Event March 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic April - May 2020 Revised land use concepts and land budgets prepared May 2020 Developer submits revised development concept June 2020 Revised servicing Report 2021 Event April 2021 Project Update Newsletter #2 posted to Website April 1, 2021 Notice of Public Information Centre April 2021 Steering Committee Meeting #4 April 15, 2021 Public Information Centre #2 April 16 — 30, 2021 Materials from PIC #2 available for public comment June 2021 Draft Summary of the Report shared with PIC attendees for review and comment June 2021 Summary Report posted to Website September 2021 Steering Committee Meeting #5 October 1, 2021 Notice of Statutory Public Meeting October 5, 2021 STC and Agencies Request for Comment; Public Meeting Notice Signs posted on property October 6, 7, 13, 14, 20 & 21, 2021 Newspaper Advertisements October 23, 2021 Staff Report and Public Meeting presentation available October 25, 2021 Statutory Public Meeting Page 72 Attachment 2 to Report PDS-052-21 Summary of Background Reports Report Key Findings and Next Steps Air Quality The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Assessment (MECP) D-series guidelines provide direction for land use Prepared by RWDI planning to maximize compatibility of industrial uses with Air Inc., 2019 adjacent land uses. The goal of Guideline D-6 is to minimize encroachment of sensitive land uses on industrial facilities and vice versa, in order to address potential incompatibility due to adverse effects such as noise, odour and dust. Recommended minimum separation distances are provided based on the industry size and operation type. The 2019 report noted that the predicted particulate and odour levels are within the applicable thresholds and are therefore considered to be acceptable throughout the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan study area. The setback requirements for the two facilities; Canopy Growth at 20 metres and Detox Environmental Ltd. at 70 metres; both fall outside of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood study area and therefor there are no impacts to development within the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood with respect to the nearby industries. Next Step: Policy to be included in the Secondary Plan to require an update to the Air Quality Assessment as part of a complete application. Noise and HGC Engineering completed a draft noise and vibration Vibration Study feasibility study in 2015 as part of the original private development applications. The key findings from the 2015 investigation are summarized. Prepared by HGC Engineering, 2015. . Areas requiring noise barriers comprised of berms and acoustic fencing on top and preliminary heights, dwellings which require forced air ventilation systems and central air conditioning, upgraded building constructions and the recommendation for a further detailed noise report were Note: Report to be identified. updated prior to Recommendation 'Ground borne vibration measurements were also completed Report at the closest proposed residential building fagade adjacent to the railway right of way, at 30 m. Vibration levels were found to be below the Canadian National (CN) guideline and therefore mitigation for vibration was not required. 1 1 P a g e Page 73 Attachment 2 to Report PDS-052-21 • The site visits in 2015 concluded that the surrounding existing commercial/industrial uses were not considered to be a significant source for noise or vibration. • Road traffic data was obtained from the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) and rail traffic from CN railway in 2015. Current and/or projected data will need to be obtained from MTO and CN Railway. Next Step: The Noise and Vibration Study Update will be prepared based on the recommended Land Use Plan for the Secondary Plan Area. Archaeological Previous background work had identified elevated potential for Assessment the recovery of archaeologically significant materials within the Prepared by study area. As the study area consisted of a ploughed Archeoworks Inc. agricultural field, it was subjected to a pedestrian survey at five -metre transects. No archaeological material was encountered during the pedestrian survey. In consideration of the study area testing negative for archaeological resources during the Stage 1-2 AA, the report concluded that the study area is considered free of archaeological concern. No further work is recommended. Hydrogeological The purpose of the investigation is to provide information Investigation and regarding the requirements for groundwater control for the Water Balance development, both during the construction phase and following Study construction. Prepared by Based on the results of the investigation, the following Terraprobe Inc. conclusions and recommendations are provided: • The Site is mostly underlain by a surficial layer of topsoil, underlain by undisturbed native soils of sandy silt to silty sand and clay and silt extending to the full depth of investigation. Exceptions were observed at borehole location BH4 and BH9. • The groundwater level generally fluctuates seasonally at the Site. The groundwater flow at the Site is towards the south on the majority of the site with the eastern edge of the Site flowing towards the east. • The hydraulic conductivity of the water bearing zone (silt and sand to silty sand) approximately ranges from 10-5 to 10-7 m/second based on the in -situ SWRT tests. For the purpose of assessing groundwater seepage rate, hydraulic conductivity of 10-6 m/second was assigned to the water bearing strata. 2 1 P a g e Page 74 Attachment 2 to Report PDS-052-21 • The total ground water recharge component for the area is estimated as 140 mm/a with 563 mm/a of evapotranspiration, and 140 mm/a of runoff. The infiltration volumes over the pre -developed site were calculated as 13,080 m3. These calculations are based on a total pre -development area of approximately 333,673 m2 (33 ha). The recommendations provided in the report will be utilized in the detailed design stage of the development. Geotechnical The geotechnical investigation provided recommendations for Investigation house foundations on native soil and engineered fill, foundation Prepared by installation, basement floor slab, earth pressure design Terraprobe Inc. parameters, basement drainage, pavement design and drainage, pipe bedding, backfill, and excavations. The recommendations provided in the report will be utilized in the detailed design stage and construction of residential dwellings and the road system. Traffic Impact The purpose of the Traffic Impact Study — Existing Conditions Study — Existing Assessment was to assess the existing conditions, to Conditions determine the traffic volumes anticipated to be generated by Assessment the proposed development during the critical weekday am and Prepared by GHD., weekday pm peak periods; to assess the impact of this traffic 2019 on the nearby roadways; and if needed, to recommend improvements to accommodate the projected traffic. The existing Road network that was assessed includes Note: Report to be updated prior • Highway 401 interchange at Bennett Road Recommendation Bennett Road Report • Lake Road/South Service Road • Wilmot Creek Drive Under existing conditions, the study area intersections are currently operating with acceptable levels of service and delays with minimal queuing. The analysis of the a.m. and p.m. peak hours confirm that there is reserve capacity available within the existing road network to accommodate additional future development. Next Step: The Traffic study will be updated to assess the proposed traffic conditions based on the recommended Land Use Plan for the Secondary Plan Area. 3 1 P a g e Page 75 Attachment 2 to Report PDS-052-21 Existing The Existing Conditions report describes the extent and quality Environmental and of natural heritage features on, and surrounding, the Wilmot Geomorphological Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan area. Conditions The extent and quality of the natural heritage features on the Report subject lands have been influenced by historic agricultural Prepared by activities, past disturbances, and the presence of the Hwy 401 Savanta, 2019 with and Canadian National Rail corridor. The primary future development constraint will involve the maintenance of the GEOMorphix Rickard Creek watercourse, the associated riparian/wetland corridor and vegetation protection zones. Note: Features identified for protection in this report have been identified as Environmental Protection Area on the Land Use Plan. Policies have been included in the Secondary Plan to protect these features. As well, and Environmental Impact Study will be required as part of a complete application. A fluvial geomorphological assessment of the two tributaries within the subject lands was completed. This assessment included a background review, reach delineation, rapid geomorphic assessments, a detailed geomorphic assessment of the most sensitive reach within Rickard Creek, erosion threshold modelling in support of the SWM plan, and determination of meander belt widths for both tributaries. A detailed geomorphic assessment was completed for portions of the Rickard Creek to inform erosion threshold modelling. The erosion threshold values for the bank materials are the most conservative and should be used as the ultimate threshold values. The critical discharge value is 0.254 m3/s. Meander belt width values were empirically modelled as reaches had been previously modified and there were no measurable meanders Based on historical aerial photographs and field observations. Meander belt width values for the Rickard Creek varied between 15.0 and 19.0 m. Next Step: Information provided in this report will be used to inform the Stormwater Management Plan to be prepared in support of the Secondary Plan. Water and The purpose of the Water and Wastewater Servicing, Wastewater Floodplain Analysis and Stormwater Management Report Servicing Report (FSSR) is to: Floodplain • Demonstrate that the proposed development can be graded Analysis and and serviced in accordance with the Agency standards: Stormwater Management Plan • Delineate the existing Regulatory Floodplain on the site; and 4 1 P a g e Page 76 Attachment 2 to Report PDS-052-21 Prepared by SCS • Confirm the stormwater management criteria and preliminary Consulting. stormwater management options. Note: Reports to Existing Sanitary Servicing - The Secondary Plan Area is not be updated prior to currently serviced however there are two sanitary sewers in the Recommendation area that can take flows from the Secondary Plan area: Report . an existing 250 mm diameter sanitary sewer is located on the 65easement/future Lake Road at Bennett Road near the northwest corner of the site that conveys flows west to the Bowmanville Water Pollution Control Plan • an existing 300 mm diameter sanitary sewer is located south of the CN Railway on Port Darlington Road. A sanitary sewer pumping station will be required to convey flows to these existing services. Existing Water Servicing - The Secondary Plan Area is not currently serviced however there are watermains in the area that can service the Secondary Plan area including: • an existing 400 mm diameter watermain located on the easement/future Lake Road at Bennett Road near the northwest corner of the Study Area that is connected to the Bowmanville Water Distribution System. • An existing 300 mm diameter watermain on Bennett Road that connects to a 300 mm diameter watermain from Port Darlington Road to the existing 400 mm diameter watermain at Lake Road. Existing Storm Drainage - The western portion of the study area generally sheet drains from north to south toward a low point approximately 225 m east of Bennett Road at the CN Railway. The central portion of the study area drains to the Rickard Creek (east of Bennett Road). Floodplain Analysis - Rickard Creek traverses the central portion of the site and is located east of Wilmot Creek Drive. An upstream external drainage area, from land north of and including Highway 401, drains to the Rickard Creek. The total upstream drainage area to Rickard Creek is approximately 129 ha. The peak runoff rate generated by greater of the 100 year or the Regional Storm (Hurricane Hazel) will be defined as the Regulatory flow rate for the purpose of the Regulatory floodplain mapping. The results of the hydrology modelling show that the Regional storm event (Hurricane Hazel) 5 1 P a g e Page 77 Attachment 2 to Report PDS-052-21 produces the largest peak flow rate and will therefor be used to define the regulatory flood plain mapping. Using the provided information, a regulatory floodline was mapped and will assist with determining the development limits for the Secondary Plan Area. Stormwater Management - The ideal location for the stormwater management pond is in the mid -south portion of the Hydro Corridor, as this is the low point in the topography. A suitable outlet will be required and may involve installation of a new culvert under the railway and either piping or channelling south to combine with the outlet channel from the existing stormwater management pond south of the railway. Next Steps: A water servicing capacity analysis will be completed to confirm the water servicing requirements for the Secondary Plan. A Functional Servicing Report (Sanitary and Water) and a Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan will be prepared in support of the Secondary Plan. Policies will be included in the Secondary Plan to require the detailed design reports as part of a complete application. Active The Active Transportation Analysis focused on a review of Transportation existing and planned pedestrian/cycle trail systems adjacent to Analysis and connecting to the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Prepared by thtinc, Plan area and identified opportunities for providing enhanced 2019 or new linkages. The Active Transportation Plan includes recommendations for: • Designing safe and direct routes for pedestrian travel to walkable nodes such as community facilities, transit terminals and commercial areas; • Designing Active Transportation networks that incorporate trails with natural features, open spaces, parks and integrates with the planned road system; • Ensuring that all roadways are designed with Complete Street principles that provide sidewalks and street trees on both sides of arterial and collector road rights -of -way; • Integrating pedestrian and cycle networks with adjacent trail systems and provide connections across key physical barriers such as railways; and, • Providing direct and continuous collector streets for transit accessibility and efficiency of service. 6 1 P a g e Page 78 Attachment 2 to Report PDS-052-21 Sustainability I The Background Report provides an overview of policies and Background recommendations for green development principles for the Report community that have been set forth through a review of Prepared by existing provincial, regional, and municipal policy documents to urbainform quation, the Sustainability Plan and Green Development 2019 019 Guidelines, including the Clarington's Official Plan and the Priority Green Clarington Development Framework. The report has been prepared to ensure that the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Area reflects the ambitions advanced in these documents. The report is structured to provide the necessary background information to assist with the preparation of sustainability policies for inclusion in the Secondary Plan and the necessary steps for moving towards the preparation of the Sustainable Development Guidelines. The Priority Green Clarington (PGC) framework and One Planet Living (OPL) was used to establish recommended Secondary Plan policies. The PGC and OPL criteria have been translated into recommended Secondary Plan policies, with attention given to synergies between the criteria and across each of the four theme areas. These policies will be refined alongside the creation and evolution of the preferred development concept. Next Step: This Background Report will inform the preparation of the Sustainability Guidelines that will be appended to the Secondary Plan. For each sustainability priority, the Sustainability Guidelines will outline both `Mandatory' and `Voluntary' performance measures. Urban Design I The Urban Design Analysis examined the existing urban Analysis design conditions and opportunities. The first component of the Prepared by The study, Existing Conditions, reviewed existing conditions within Planning the Study Area and in the surrounding areas. The review Partnership. included existing and proposed development surrounding the Study Area, connectivity such as roads and active transportation, views and vistas, destinations, and community infrastructure. Based on the review of existing conditions, Official Plan policy directions, and the Priority Green Checklist criteria, the urban design intent for the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan and development options should consider the following: • A high quality, well -designed Built Environment is valued within the Municipality. 7 1 P a g e Page 79 Attachment 2 to Report PDS-052-21 • The Natural Heritage System, made up of Environmental Protection Areas, hedgerows, and stormwater ponds provide key organizing elements of the Plan, as well as a recognizable and ever-present way to orient oneself within the community. • A High -Quality Public Realm, consisting of a hierarchy of active and passive parks, along with a variety of streets, will enhance mobility, promote healthy and active lifestyles and contribute to the character of the community. • An Accessible and Connected Active Transportation Network, consisting of pedestrian and cycling routes, sidewalks and trails, will be important to promoting healthy, active lifestyles. • Gateways and Landmarks are important parts of the fabric of the neighbourhood and can be created using a combination of buildings, landscapes, open spaces, or public art. • A Permeable Street and Block Pattern, with a modified grid of streets and block lengths to create a more pedestrian -scaled environment and provide multiple points of access and routes of movement through the community. • A Neighbourhood Centre will create an animated focal point that will include a combination of medium density housing forms, public space, mixed-use/live-work opportunities and potential community uses. Urban design must also take into consideration the challenges of the Study Area, such as the Hydro and CN Rail corridors, Highway 401, adjacent employment uses, access to the Study Area, and Rickard Creek and associated wetland setbacks. These create constraints to development and potential setbacks that will need to be addressed at the plan preparation stage and confirmed through the findings of the technical studies. Building on the urban design intent and an understanding of the existing conditions of the Study Area and the broader area of influence, a number of opportunities have been identified for consideration in the preparation of the development options for the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood. Landscape The Landscape Analysis examined the existing context of the Analysis lands within the study area including the following: 8 1 P a g e '� Attachment 2 to Report PDS-052-21 Prepared by The • a description and assessment of the existing context of Planning the lands within the study area; Partnership, 2019. • existing natural features; and • the study area's topography and grading to comprehensively understand the slopes of the site and their orientational aspect. As a result of this landscape analysis a series of recommendations have been established to guide the Secondary Plan policy and future work within the subject lands. The north-west corner of the site is presently home to a group of impressive mature Sugar Maple and Black Walnut trees. These trees are a stunning feature of the site that should be preserved. • The riparian system for the Rickard Creek should be improved and the consultant recommends the existing vegetation be removed, the banks regraded, and appropriate, native plantings be reinstalled. • To improve resilience, it is recommended that a planting strategy be established which increases species diversity and ensures that a higher proportion of locally native species are employed. • Remove all invasive Buckthorn. • Make use of existing vistas, both natural and anthropogenic, throughout the site for key community open spaces. • Maintain landscape features that serve as interesting subjects for future views. • Utilize existing Wilmot Creek Drive view corridor. • Maintain or introduce view corridors to Lake Ontario. 9 1 P a g e Page 81 Attachment 3 to Report PDS-052-21 Draft Amendment No. 130 To the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan Purpose: The purpose of this Amendment is to include the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan in the Clarington Official Plan. This Secondary Plan, including Sustainable Development Guidelines, will facilitate the development of a sustainable, livable, and inclusive community in the Secondary Plan area. Although predominantly residential, the Secondary Plan area will feature a mix and intensity of uses that allow many needs to be met locally, while also having access to broader amenities. This initiative complements the Official Plan principles of promoting higher densities, mix of uses, a diversity of housing types and tenures, as well as promoting sustainable design throughout the Secondary Plan area. Location: This Amendment applies to an approximately 42-hectare area generally bounded by Bennett Road in the west, the interchange for Highway 35/115 to the east and Highway 401 in the north. The southern boundary is the Canadian National (CN) rail line and the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. Approximately one third of the area contains natural features, a hydro transmission line easement, and Ministry of Transportation (MTO) lands. Basis: An application and supporting studies for an Official Plan Amendment (OPA) for the lands was submitted by Rice Development Group in 2015. The Wilmot Creek Homeowners Association made a submission to the Official Plan Amendment application outlining their concerns with the development proposal. In June 2016, Rice Development Group appealed the Official Plan Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board in response to Clarington Council's failure to make a decision on the application. A settlement was reached and approved by the Ontario Municipal Board in 2017. The landowners and the Municipality agreed to advance the Secondary Planning process as set out in OPA 107 once approved by the Region of Durham. Clarington Council authorized the commencement of this Secondary Plan at a public meeting before Clarington Council in December 2017. The Secondary Plan has been prepared based on the priorities of Council which include Affordable Housing, Excellence in Urban Design, and Sustainability and Climate Change and are key policy directions guiding the Secondary Plan. Fundamental to the above has been Community Engagement. The Secondary Plan's first Public Information Centre (PIC) was held at The Wheelhouse in July 2018. Over 300 members of the public attended this open -house -style session. At this meeting, attendees were introduced to the Secondary Plan planning and design process. Page 82 A virtual Public Information Centre #2 (PIC #2) was held in April 2021. The purpose of the PIC was to provide a project update and share and seek feedback on the Emerging Plan for the Secondary Plan area. The priorities for the emerging plan included environmental protection, an active transportation network, and diverse mix of housing types. Approximately 100 people joined the session. Public and landowner input was received through a facilitated plenary discussion, email, and online comment forms. The Steering Committee's input has also provided direction for the secondary plan. Background reports were prepared as part of the Secondary Plan process. The background reports below highlighted key challenges and opportunities for Wilmot Creek and provided direction to the Secondary Plan. The technical studies completed in support of the previous application COPA 2003-0012 were reinitiated to allow for an update/addendum to the reports since their original submission. The list of existing reports is as follows: • Environmental Impact Study • Air Quality Assessment • Archaeological Assessment • Geotechnical Investigation • Traffic Impact Assessment • Noise and Vibration Study • Fiscal Impact Analysis New technical studies were also prepared to support the Secondary Plan and include the following: • Technical Summary Report • Active Transportation • Urban Design • Water Wastewater Servicing Plan • Floodplain Analysis/Stormwater Management Plan • Landscape Analysis • Green Development Guidelines The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan and Sustainable Development Guidelines have been created based upon the study team's analysis and the public consultation process described above. 4 Page 83 Actual Amendment: Unless otherwise indicated, in the Amendment, newly added text is shown with underlining, and deleted text is shown with a str'kethroi ugh 1. Existing Section Special Policy Area B — Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood" is hereby amended as follows: "16.3.2 Special Policy Area B has two development areas as follows: a) Area B1 includes the lands located south of the CN railway. A maximum of 960 dwelling units are permitted; and b) Area B2 includes the lands located north of the CN railway. A minimum of 700 dwelling units, which may include assisted living facilities, and a Neighbourhood Centre are permitted. A - variety of hoi icing formse gi which may insli de retirement and assisted) Iniipg facilities are epneUragerd su bjent to the 2. Existing Section 16.3 Special Policy Area B — Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood is hereby amended as follows: "Special Policy Area B2 16.3.7 Special Policy Area B2 is subject to the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood preparatieR Secondary Plan under Part Six Secondary Plans. It will include a Neighbourhood Centre and a mix of housing types and tenures, with Consideration shall he given to leeate high rise residential uses located ad'lacent to Highway 401, and nommerGial us on a public road system within a plan of subdivision. A portion of the lands may he developed with private leasehold arrangements and private streets-." 3. Existing Part Six, Section 3 "General Policies for Secondary Plans" is hereby amended as follows: "3. Secondary Plans have been prepared for the following areas: a) Bowmanville East Town Centre; b) Bowmanville West Town Centre; c) Courtice Main Street; d) Newcastle Village Main Central Area; e) Port Darlington Neighbourhood; f) Bayview; N g) Clarington Energy Business Park; h) Brookhill Neighbourhood; i) Clarington Technology Business Park; j) Foster Northwest; apA k) Southeast Courtice; and 1) Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood." 4. Existing Part Six Secondary Plans is amended by adding a new Secondary Plan to Part Six as follows: 0 Page 85 Attachment 4 to Report PDS-052-21 Draft Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Municipality of Clarington Draft for Statutory Public Meeting October 5, 2021 '� Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................1 2.0 VISION AND PRINCIPLES...................................................................................2 2.1 Vision................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Principles.......................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 GROWTH MANAGEMENT...................................................................................4 3.1 Phasing Policies............................................................................................................... 4 4.0 Community Structure.......................................................................................... 5 4.1 Open Space System......................................................................................................... 5 4.2 Road Network................................................................................................................... 5 4.3 Parks System.................................................................................................................... 6 4.4 Urban Residential............................................................................................................. 6 4.5 Commercial Area.............................................................................................................. 7 5.0 SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE ....................................................... 7 5.1 Objectives......................................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Sustainable Design and Climate Change......................................................................... 8 5.3 Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation....................................................................... 8 5.4 Air Quality......................................................................................................................... 9 5.5 Water Conservation.......................................................................................................... 9 5.6 Energy Conservation...................................................................................................... 10 5.7 Energy Generation.......................................................................................................... 10 5.8 Local Food Production.................................................................................................... 11 6.0 NATURAL HERITAGE........................................................................................11 6.1 Objectives....................................................................................................................... 11 6.2 General Policies.............................................................................................................. 11 6.3 Urban Forest and Native Plantings................................................................................. 12 7.0 CREATING VIBRANT URBAN PLACES...........................................................13 7.1 Objectives....................................................................................................................... 13 7.2 Urban Design Intent........................................................................................................ 13 7.3 The Public Realm........................................................................................................... 14 i I DRAFT October 2021 Page 87 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 7.4 Transition........................................................................................................................ 17 7.5 The Private Realm.......................................................................................................... 18 8.0 ENCOURAGING HOUSING DIVERSITY............................................................22 8.1 Objectives....................................................................................................................... 22 8.2 General Policies.............................................................................................................. 22 9.0 CELEBRATING OUR CULTURAL HERITAGE .................................................. 25 9.1 Objectives....................................................................................................................... 25 9.2 Cultural Heritage............................................................................................................. 25 10.0 MOBILITY AND ROADS..................................................................................... 26 10.1. Objectives....................................................................................................................... 26 10.2. General Mobility Policies................................................................................................. 26 10.3. Arterial Roads................................................................................................................. 28 10.4. Collector Roads.............................................................................................................. 28 10.5. Local Roads.................................................................................................................... 28 10.6. Rear Lanes..................................................................................................................... 29 10.7. Private Roads................................................................................................................. 30 10.8. Controlled Access Gate and Road.................................................................................. 31 10.9. Roundabouts.................................................................................................................. 31 10.10. Public Transit.................................................................................................................. 31 10.11. Active Transportation...................................................................................................... 32 10.12. Parking........................................................................................................................... 34 10.13. Railways......................................................................................................................... 34 11.0 PARKS AND COMMUNITY AMENITIES............................................................ 35 11.1. Objectives....................................................................................................................... 35 11.2. General Policies for Parks.............................................................................................. 35 11.3. Neighbourhood Parks..................................................................................................... 36 11.4. Parkettes........................................................................................................................ 37 11.5. Privately Owned Publicly -Accessible Spaces................................................................. 38 12.0 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS..............................................................................38 12.1. Objectives....................................................................................................................... 38 12.2. General Land Use Policies............................................................................................. 39 12.3. Medium Density Residential Designation........................................................................ 40 12.4. High Density Residential Designation............................................................................. 42 ii I DRAFT October 2021 Page 88 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 12.5. Neighbourhood Centre Designation................................................................................ 43 12.6. Environmental Protection Area Designation................................................................... 45 12.7. Green Space Designation............................................................................................... 46 13.0 SERVICING.........................................................................................................46 13.1. Municipal Services.......................................................................................................... 46 13.2. Stormwater Management............................................................................................... 47 13.3. Utilities............................................................................................................................ 48 14.0 IMPLEMENTATION........................................................................................ 48 14.1 General...........................................................................................................................48 14.2 Required Studies and Reports........................................................................................ 5C 15.0 INTERPRETATION ......................................................................................... 51 iii I DRAFT October 2021 Page 89 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan is located south of Highway 401 and north of the Canadian National (CN) rail line and the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. Its westerly boundary is Bennett Road and the interchange for Highway 35/115 forms the easterly boundary. The area for the Secondary Plan is approximately 42 hectares (104 acres) in size. Of that total, approximately one third of the area contains natural features, a hydro transmission line easement, and Ministry of Transportation (MTO) lands. The Secondary Plan has been prepared to ensure that future development is based on the latest Provincial and local policies and to guide growth and the sustainable development of the lands. The Plan builds on the policies of the Clarington Official Plan ("Official Plan") and provides a detailed planning framework specific to the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Area. The Secondary Plan has been prepared with the intent that growth shall occur in a logical, efficient, and fiscally responsible manner. The Secondary Plan Area is anticipated to accommodate between 700 to 1100 dwelling units resulting in an estimate population of approximately 1500 to 1800 residents. The purpose of the Secondary Plan is to establish goals and policies to guide development within the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood, as it is implemented through subdivision, zoning, and site plan control. The policies reflect key themes for the area to support an environmentally sustainable neighbourhood that preserves the natural environment, provides a diversity of housing options, connected green spaces, and an area with a mix of uses. Environmental Sustainability - The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood will be developed to minimize impacts on the environment. The Secondary Plan supports environmental sustainability by: • Supporting an adaptive and resilient community through the responsible use of resources; • Reducing demands for energy, water, and waste systems; • Ensuring new development contributes to adapting to, and mitigating, the impacts of climate change; and • Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through the design of complete streets and active transportation opportunities. Healthy, Complete Community - The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood will be a healthy, connected, and complete community which supports human well-being and active lifestyles by: 1 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 90 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT • Designing for a complete community that meets people's needs for daily living throughout an entire lifetime. Complete communities are characterized by a mix and diversity of housing types and uses, including affordable housing; convenient access to public services, community infrastructure, mobility options; and a robust open space system; • Supporting new development in a contiguous, connected, and compact urban form; • Designing the built environment to create opportunities for residents to be physically active, socially engaged, and have a high quality of life; and • Encouraging healthier lifestyles by creating connected and walkable road patterns with amenities and services within a 5 minute walk (400 m). Environmental Preservation - The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood will preserve and enhance environmental features by: • Recognizing the importance of the natural features as contributing to the quality of life for local residents; • Observing defined protection areas and exploring land use design options that restore or enhance the natural heritage system; and • Providing a continuous open space system linking natural features, public parks, stormwater management facilities, and trails. The Sustainable Development Guidelines attached as Appendix A provide further guidance on the implementation of the policies of this Secondary Plan. 2.0 VISION AND PRINCIPLES 2.1 Vision The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood is envisioned as an environmentally sustainable and healthy community with liveable neighbourhoods, integrated and connected green spaces, efficient transportation and trails systems, and a vibrant commercial area. It is intended that the Secondary Plan Area will be a safe and inclusive pedestrian -oriented community that supports walkability and active living with accessible amenities. 2 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 91 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 2.2 Principles The principles of this Secondary Plan work together to further articulate the vision of a complete community that meets the needs of residents and addresses public health, climate change, environmental preservation, and the quality of the built environment. 2.2.1. Promote an adaptive and resilient community through the responsible use of resources, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, reduction of demands on energy, water, and waste systems, and the impacts of climate change. 2.2.2. Promote development and land use patterns that conserve biodiversity, ecological integrity, and function to protect the health of the natural environment. 2.2.3. Create a healthy, pedestrian -oriented environment that supports opportunities for daily physical activity in a safe, inclusive, and accessible community, meeting the needs of residents of all ages and abilities. 2.2.4. Ensure the provision of an accessible and connected multimodal transportation network that gives priority to the creation of complete streets and the provision of active transportation to ensure all persons have transportation options while reducing automobile dependence. To also ensure residents of the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community have unimpeded access to their community through a controlled access gate and private road. 2.2.5. Provide for an appropriate mix of housing options, including affordable and rental housing to meet the projected needs of present and future residents throughout all stages of their lives. 2.2.6. Provide a mix of uses and small scale commercial and office uses within a reasonable walking distance of residents. 2.2.7. Create a connected parks and trails network that complements the road -based circulation network, including pedestrian and cycling, providing both utilitarian and recreational amenities that support active and healthy living. 2.2.8. Promote efficient development and land use patterns and coordinated planning for transportation and municipal services to sustain the financial well-being of the municipality over the long term. 2.2.9. Strive for design excellence in buildings, roads, and open spaces. 3 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 92 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 3.0 GROWTH MANAGEMENT 3.1 Phasing Policies 3.1.1 The phasing of development is addressed to ensure the Secondary Plan conforms with the policies of the Province and the Region with respect to Growth Management. 3.1.2 The Municipality and Region shall carefully monitor residential growth within the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Area. Development Phasing will be established based on population growth over time, in accordance with, and in conjunction with the ability of the developers, Municipality, and Region to pay for their respective responsibilities of infrastructure development costs as required. 3.1.3 Development shall progress in a logical, efficient, and fiscally responsible manner. The cost-effective provision of municipal infrastructure shall establish the phasing for this Secondary Plan. 3.1.4 It is the intent of this Secondary Plan that growth shall occur in an orderly and phased manner. The phasing strategy for the Secondary Plan Area and the primary factors to consider in this regard include: a. The integration of new development within the planned community structure of this Secondary Plan, resulting in a contiguous, connected, and compact urban form; b. The provision of adequate municipal services (water, sanitary, stormwater) to accommodate the proposed growth in a cost-efficient manner; and the ability of new growth to facilitate the provision of municipal services to existing serviced areas; C. The provision of appropriate transportation facilities, and the availability of adequate capacity on the existing road network; and d. The provision and adequacy of social services, recreational facilities, and other community services. 4 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 93 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 4.0 COMMUNITY STRUCTURE The Community Structure of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood is based on achieving the vision and principles in Section 2. The components of the community structure are elements that shape the distribution of land uses and include the following: Open Space System ii. Road Network iii. Parks System iv. Urban Residential V. Commercial Area 4.1 Open Space System 4.1.1 The Open Space System includes the natural heritage system which includes all core natural heritage features, such as wetlands, woodlands, and tributaries and shall be protected, restored, and enhanced to create a continuous green corridor. 4.1.2 The features of Rickard Creek contribute strongly to Community Structure. The Rickard Creek divides the Secondary Plan Area and forms the basis for a naturalized channel that runs north -south through the community. 4.2 Road Network 4.2.1 The Road Network includes the main Collector Road, Local Roads, Private Roads, and the controlled access road to the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. The road network will be characterized by highly interconnected streets with short block lengths to allow traffic to dissipate to local destinations. Interconnected streets reduce congestion, promote walkability, and improve emergency vehicle access. 4.2.2 The road network will be developed under the principle of complete streets and will accommodate appropriate facilities for the movement of pedestrians, cyclists, future transit, and vehicles. 5 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 94 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 4.3 Parks System 4.3.1 Parks are vital public spaces connecting to a broader public realm network. A variety of park space shall be provided that meets the needs of residents and enables opportunities for passive and active recreation. 4.3.2 The parks system includes Neighbourhood Parks, parkettes, urban squares, and a trail network. Parks are located throughout the community to ensure that residents are within a short walking distance of an open space. This encourages daily physical activity and creates a central focus and gathering space for the community. 4.3.3 The trails system includes multi -use paths for pedestrians and cyclists that are separated from vehicular traffic. The trails system connects the parks and open spaces within the community, as well as connecting to existing trails outside of the community. 4.4 Urban Residential 4.4.1 Urban Residential areas are predominantly residential and will include a mix and diversity of housing types to ensure variety and choice. Urban Residential areas will provide medium and high density housing with a range of townhouses and low -to mid -rise apartment buildings. Urban Residential areas correspond with the Medium and High Density designations on Schedule A. 4.4.2 Urban Residential areas will be the location of many of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood's parks. These amenities will be integrated into the fabric of the community to ensure access to open space. 4.4.3 High density housing in the form of apartment buildings will be focused along Highway 401 and east of Rickard Creek. These buildings will assist with creating a visual and acoustic buffer along the highway. 4.4.4 A range of medium density housing will be distributed throughout the remainder of the Secondary Plan Area with the lowest buildings located in proximity to the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. 6 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 95 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 4.5 Commercial Area 4.5.1 A commercial area has been included to provide opportunities for amenities and services within an approximate 10 minute walk of residents (800 metres). 4.5.2 A Neighbourhood Centre is located at the intersection of Bennett Road and the main entrance to the community. The Neighbourhood Centre will have a mix of uses including retail and service commercial, cultural uses, and apartments in mixed -use buildings. This area will be pedestrian focused with a vibrant, walkable streetscape that will bring the community together and provide an identity for the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood. 5.0 SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE The Municipality of Clarington has adopted a sustainable green lens approach to development. The commitment to reach net zero communities and the reduction of greenhouse gases is a priority for Council. To assist with meeting Council priorities communities, neighbourhoods, and new buildings shall be designed with a focus on reducing water use, waste generation, and energy use. Since human activity is the principal cause of elevated levels of air pollutants and greenhouse gases, and of demands on energy, water, and waste systems, the policies of this Plan will focus on means of reducing this impact on both the built and natural environments. 5.1 Objectives 5.1.1 Demonstrate leadership in sustainable forms of green building design and technology, including the incorporation of renewable and alternative energy sources. 5.1.2 Encourage energy conservation through appropriate site planning, urban design, and the use of energy efficient materials. 5.1.3 Utilize, wherever possible, street alignments and building placement to maximize potential for passive and active solar energy capture. 5.1.4 Incorporate Low Impact Development ("LID") best practices and green infrastructure, wherever feasible to minimize runoff, reduce water pollution, and protect groundwater resources. 7 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 96 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 5.1.5 Ensure streetscape design incorporates appropriate resilient tree species and spacing to minimize heat island effect. 5.2 Sustainable Design and Climate Change 5.2.1 The Municipality will use its array of planning tools, including this Secondary Plan, and associated Sustainable Development Guidelines, as well as the Priority Sustainable Development Program in accordance with the Official Plan to help guide development to be more sustainable. 5.2.2 The promotion of green building technologies, renewable and alternative energy sources, and other sustainable design options for development shall be in accordance with the policies of Section 5.5 of the Official Plan and all relevant Provincial legislation and policy directives. 5.2.3 Development applications shall be consistent with Section 5.6.5 of the Official Plan and shall include a Sustainability Report indicating how the development meets the sustainable development principles and policies of this Plan, including addressing sustainable community, site, and building design. 5.3 Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation 5.3.1 Integrate climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies through land use and development patterns that are sustainable by: a. Maximizing vegetation and natural areas to support improved air quality and carbon sequestration; b. Reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants; C. Maximizing opportunities for the use of renewable energy systems; and d. Promoting active transportation. 5.3.2 The Municipality shall work with Durham Region, GO Transit, Metrolinx, and adjacent municipalities to improve transit services, carpooling, and other traffic demand management measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. 8 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 97 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 5.4 Air Quality 5.4.1 In order to minimize the air quality and climate change impacts associated with new growth, the following shall be included in this Plan: a. The reduction of air pollution through the development of complete communities; b. The reduction of vehicle kilometres travelled across the Secondary Plan Area through increased mobility choices and the promotion of walking, cycling, and transit; and C. The separation of sensitive land uses from air pollutant sources through appropriate separation distances, land use planning, and zoning. 5.4.2 Where feasible, support the use of electric vehicles through the provision of charging infrastructure in the Neighbourhood Centre. 5.4.3 The Municipality will require the impact of car parking to be minimized by: a. Requiring that mixed use developments include shared use of parking among uses that have different peaking characteristics; Designing parking areas so they are not the primary visual component of a neighbourhood; Reducing the parking ratio required in areas that are served by transit; and Dedicating priority parking spaces for carpool, ride sharing, and ultra -low emission vehicles. 5.5 Water Conservation 5.5.1 To support water conservation, the Municipality will: a. Require green infrastructure by utilizing the absorbing and filtering abilities of plants, trees, and soil to protect water quality, reduce runoff volumes, and recharge groundwater supplies; b. Require the use of drought tolerant and diverse tree and shrub species in parks, along streetscapes, and in public and private landscaping to reduce water use; 9 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 98 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT C. Encourage the use of porous or permeable pavement instead of standard asphalt and concrete for surfacing sidewalks, driveways, parking areas, and many types of road surfaces as a stormwater run-off management strategy for promoting groundwater infiltration and water quality treatment; and d. Implement LID measures that emphasize the use of bio-swales, innovative stormwater practices, constructed wetlands, at -source infiltration, greywater re -use system, and alternative filtration systems such as treatment trains and water conservation measures. 5.6 Energy Conservation 5.6.1. In order to reduce energy consumption, development proposals that include energy efficient building design and practices in all new buildings, shall be encouraged and supported. 5.6.2. To assist with the mitigation of heat island effects, the Municipality will promote: a. Incorporating green roofs planted with vegetation to contribute to cooling while also assisting with stormwater management, improved air quality, and energy efficiency of buildings; b. Implementing cool roofs strategies into building design that use high albedo materials to reduce heat gain; C. Strategic use of deciduous trees or preservation of existing trees to help with evapotranspiration, shading of sidewalks and hard surface areas in summer, and solar access in winter; and d. Installation of light-coloured paving materials including white concrete, grey concrete, open pavers, and any material with a solar reflectance index of at least 29. 5.7 Energy Generation 5.7.1. Alternative energy systems and renewable energy systems shall be permitted and encouraged throughout the Secondary Plan Area in accordance with Provincial and Federal requirements. 10 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 99 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 5.7.2. Development plans and building designs shall provide opportunities for south facing windows and building orientation to maximize potential for passive and active solar energy. Where feasible, implement street and block alignment within 25 degrees of geographic east -west to maximize solar gain. 5.8 Local Food Production 5.8.1. The creation of opportunities for local food production and distribution in the Secondary Plan Area is supported by the Municipality. Development plans and building designs shall incorporate opportunities for local food production through: a. Community gardens; b. Community orchards; and C. Local market space (i.e., a farmer's market). 6.0 NATURAL HERITAGE 6.1 Objectives 6.1.1. Protect and enhance local and regional ecosystems and biological diversity. 6.1.2. Ensure development does not negatively impact natural heritage features or their ecological functions by providing appropriate separation distances and buffers. 6.1.3. Provide a functional and highly interconnected system of natural heritage features, parks, trails, and stormwater management facilities that are accessible and visible to residents. 6.2 General Policies 6.2.1. All development shall adhere to the policies of the Official Plan, as it pertains to the policy areas of the Natural Heritage System. 6.2.2. The Natural Heritage System ("NHS") is largely composed of lands that contain natural heritage features and hydrologic features. The system also includes other lands that serve as linkages, corridors, and adjacent buffer lands. 6.2.3. The Municipality recognizes the important contribution that natural heritage features make to the creation of a vibrant, livable community. The natural 11 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page100 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT heritage features within the Secondary Plan Area are identified as Environmental Protection Area on Schedule A. 6.2.4. Lands within the Environmental Protection Area are to be protected, conserved, and restored. Moreover, the Environmental Protection Area together with a network of parks and trails can be leveraged to provide unique views and connections through the community that contribute to creating a sense of place. 6.2.5. Natural heritage features should be physically and visually accessible from the abutting roads. 6.2.6. Preservation of existing vegetation is encouraged. 6.3 Urban Forest and Native Plantings 6.3.1. Together, new development and public realm improvements shall establish an urban tree canopy throughout the Secondary Plan Area to minimize the heat island effect, provide for shade and wind cover, and contribute to a green and attractive environment. 6.3.2. New development and public realm improvements are required to use native plant species wherever possible, particularly along rights -of -way and pedestrian trails. 6.3.3. New development and public realm improvements shall only use native plantings within 30 metres of Environmental Protection Areas. 6.3.4. All private development shall be supported by landscape plans which demonstrate how the development will contribute to the urban forest, improve the health and diversity of the natural environment, support other local plant and animal species, and further enhance the connectivity of the built environment to natural heritage features and hydrologically sensitive features. 6.3.5. A diversity of tree species shall be planted in parks and along rights -of -way to provide a healthy and more robust tree inventory that is less prone to insects and diseases. Native and adaptive non-invasive species shall be prioritized, as they provide habitat and biodiversity and do not require irrigation or fertilizers to flourish. The selection of tree species within the Secondary Plan Area will contribute the Municipality's species diversity objectives. 6.3.6. Where trees and shrubs are destroyed or harvested pre -maturely prior to proper study and approval, compensation will be calculated at a 3:1 ratio. 12 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 101 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 7.0 CREATING VIBRANT URBAN PLACES The Municipality's objectives for urban design in The Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood are based on the belief that the livability and physical appeal of a community can be enhanced by the quality, layout, and attractiveness of its public and private realms. 7.1 Objectives 7.1.1. Develop a welcoming community that encourages and supports active living, social engagement, and the creation of a sense of place and well-being. 7.1.2. Encourage a high quality and consistent level of urban design for the public and private realms through adherence to the principles, policies, and requirements of this Secondary Plan and in accordance with the Sustainable Development Guidelines. 7.1.3. Ensure buildings, streetscapes, parks and open spaces, and infrastructure are distinctive and aesthetically pleasing. 7.1.4. Ensure that traffic calming measures are an integral part of the community design through streetscape design measures, boulevard tree planting, street curvature, axial view, and appropriate on -street parking provisions that do not impede the pedestrian and cycling networks and the provision of safe infrastructure. 7.1.5. Provide for the orientation of building front fagades, both public and private, to frame streetscapes and to enhance the public realm and encourage pedestrian activity. 7.1.6. Require high quality architecture that transcends a theme or a specific period in time is fundamental to a beautiful community. Buildings should be compatible with one another, but there must be a diversity of scale and a diversity of style defined through building materials, colour, and architectural details. 7.1.7. Provide a transition between areas of different development intensity and uses. 7.2 Urban Design Intent 7.2.1. The Secondary Plan is designed to achieve a community that is diverse in use and population, is scaled to the pedestrian, can accommodate private automobiles and transit, and has a well defined high -quality public realm. 13 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page102 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 7.2.2. New development shall be consistent with the urban design policies contained in Section 5 of the Official Plan, the policies of this Secondary Plan, and shall be in accordance with the Sustainable Development Guidelines. 7.2.3. The Sustainable Development Guidelines shall accompany this Plan and be used as guidance in the interpretation and implementation of the Secondary Plan's policies. 7.3 The Public Realm 7.3.1. The public realm compromises public roads, parks and open spaces, natural heritage features and their associated buffers, stormwater management facilities, and the public use activity areas of other public lands and private development sites and buildings. 7.3.2. The design and development of the public realm shall be consistent with the policies of Section 5.3 of the Official Plan, the policies of this Secondary Plan, and shall be in accordance with the Sustainable Development Guidelines. Roads and Streetscapes 7.3.3. The design of Roads will: a. Provide access for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles, opportunities for vistas, view corridors, pedestrian amenity areas, and space for utilities and services; b. Be subject to comprehensive streetscape requirements in the Sustainable Development Guidelines to ensure the public realm is consistent in quality and design; C. Be aligned to create a modified rectilinear grid pattern that defines development blocks and establishes a highly inter -connected and permeable network that maximizes accessibility and support for transit; d. Be designed to ensure efficient walking routes to key destinations with continuous sidewalks, or equivalent provisions for walking, on both sides of the road; e. Implement traffic calming measures on Collector and Local Roads such as on -street parking, reduced lane widths, raised intersections, curb bulb - outs, and/or traffic circles to reduce vehicular traffic speeds and to ensure safe walking and cycling environments; and 14 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page103 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT Provide street trees and landscaping on both sides of the road to create and enhance the urban tree canopy while providing shade over sidewalks, where appropriate. 7.3.4. Adequate space and safety provisions will be provided for the movement of pedestrians and cyclists with a clear system of through routes. 7.3.5. Sidewalks shall form a continuous network throughout the community and constitute an integral part of the pedestrian system to promote active transportation. All sidewalks shall be designed to enhance accessibility for all residents and will comply with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA). 7.3.6. Utility providers will be encouraged to consider innovative methods of containing equipment associated with utility services on or within streetscape features including, but not limited to, gateways, lamp posts, and transit shelters when determining appropriate locations for larger equipment and cluster sites. Views and Focal Points 7.3.7. The preservation, enhancement, and creation of significant views and focal points shall be encouraged by: a. Preserving and enhancing scenic views to natural features including Rickard Creek and Lake Ontario; b. Creating and maintaining opportunities for views of important public buildings, open spaces and parks, and other landmarks through the layout of the road, parks, and open space networks; C. Maintaining and preserving the existing mature Sugar Maple and Black Walnut trees in the north-west corner of the secondary plan as a key natural feature and focal point; and d. Providing for sites that terminate road and view corridors. Public Buildings 7.3.8. Public buildings, facilities, and spaces enhance the quality of the urban setting and are an important component of a community. To recognize the importance of public and institutional buildings in the community and to enhance their status, public buildings will be consistent with Section 5.3.4 of the Official Plan and: 15 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page104 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT a. Be sited at the termination of a road or view corridor, or at road intersections, or on sites that enjoy prominence due to topographic and natural features; b. Be designed as special landmark buildings with high quality design, materials, and finishes. The site should be landscaped in recognition of the prominent location and to reflect the status of the landmark building; and C. Be located close to the road right-of-way to reinforce the road edge to create a visually dominant feature in the community. Building Orientation 7.3.9. To reinforce the road, lane, and block pattern established by this Secondary Plan, the following measures will be employed: a. Buildings will be aligned parallel to a public or private road; b. Buildings will be in proximity to the property line adjoining the public or private road; C. Buildings on corner sites will be sited and massed toward the intersection of the adjoining public roads; d. Siting and massing of buildings will provide a consistent relationship, continuity, and enclosure to the public or private roads; e. Siting and massing of buildings will contribute to and reinforce the comfort, safety, and amenity of the public and private roads; f. Buildings located adjacent to, or at the edge of parks and open spaces, will provide opportunities for overlook onto the parks and open spaces; g. The massing, siting, and scale of buildings located adjacent to, or along the edge of a park or open space, will create a degree of enclosure or definition appropriate to the type of park or open space they enclose; and h. Buildings of significant public use or architectural merit may be sited to specifically differ from the surrounding urban fabric to emphasize their importance as landmarks. 16 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page105 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT Public Art 7.3.10. The installation of public art is encouraged in public locations such as privately owned publicly accessible spaces and parks to contribute to the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan's identity and sense of place Gateways 7.3.11. The Neighbourhood Centre will form the primary gateway into the community. The gateway will highlight the entrance to the community through design features such as landscaping, low walls, signage, architectural treatments, and upgraded pavement treatment. 7.3.12. A secondary gateway will be provided to signify the entrance into the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. Special entry paving and signage, landscaping, and decorative fencing will identify the private road and controlled access gate. 7.4 Transition 7.4.1. Where development of a higher density built form abuts lands with a lower density residential form mitigation measures including transition setbacks or buffers shall be provided from the adjacent use in accordance with the appropriate studies and in keeping with the Sustainable Development Guidelines. 7.4.2. The Municipality may require that applications for development undertake technical studies including a wind study and/or sun/shadow study which demonstrate mitigation of potential shadow or wind impacts on existing or proposed pedestrian routes, public spaces, and adjacent development to the satisfaction of the Municipality. Analysis may also be required to address applicable angular plane guidance. 7.4.3. Development shall be compatible and sensitively integrated with surrounding residential uses in terms of building mass, height, setbacks, orientation, privacy, landscaping, shadow casting, accessibility, and visual impact. 7.4.4. Development transition requirements may be met using a combination of the following: a. Separate development of a mid -rise built form from low-rise built form with a Local Road; 17 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page106 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT b. Require a minimum 7.5 metre rear yard setback for development of a mid - rise built form that abuts residential properties of a low-rise built form; C. Mitigate the actual and perceived massing impacts of a higher density built form by breaking up the mass horizontally and vertically, through the creative incorporation of changes in materials, balcony and floor plate design, architectural features, and unit/amenity locations; d. Provide rear and side stepbacks for upper storeys to provide contextually appropriate transitions from the mid -rise buildings to the surrounding low- rise built form, where appropriate; e. Provision of high quality landscape treatment such as decorative fencing, trees, shrubs, grassed areas, and berming; f. Control of the location of loading areas; g. Control of the location of garbage collection/storage facilities; h. Regulation of lighting and signs so they are averted or shielded from adjacent uses; Rooftop equipment shall be unobtrusive and screened from view; and Provision of adequate screening such as solid or perforated fencing, trellises, or other appropriate structures. 7.5 The Private Realm 7.5.1. The private realm is comprised of a variety of built forms and private spaces and their relationship to natural features, open spaces, and the street network. The residential dwellings and commercial uses envisioned for the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood will contribute to its character and support the public realm through form, architectural details, and features. Development Blocks and Lots 7.5.2. Development will be accommodated on a modified street grid including Collector Roads, Local Roads, Lanes, and Private Roads to establish development blocks that achieve an efficient pattern and provide visual interest and diversity. 7.5.3. Provide neighbourhood permeability by designing blocks to be generally no more than 200 metres in length to promote active transportation, discourage excessive driver speed, and disperse traffic movements. 18 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page107 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 7.5.4. The size and configuration of each development block will be appropriate for its intended use, facilitate convenient pedestrian movement; and provide a sufficient range of building lots to achieve efficient development. Each development lot in a block will: a. Have frontage on a public or private road, or park; and b. Be of a size and configuration to accommodate development that reflects the planning and urban design policies set out in the Official Plan and this Plan. 7.5.5. The maximum number of contiguously attached townhouses shall be six. 7.5.6. Multi -unit residential development shall be consistent with the policies of Section 9.4.5 of the Official Plan. 7.5.7. Mid -block pedestrian connections and trails shall be provided to further enhance the pedestrian permeability of the area, the efficiency and variety of pedestrian routes, and access to transit. Mid -block connections shall be barrier free and visible from the sidewalk for easy access. Built Form 7.5.8. Buildings shall be designed for an urban context with primary building facades fronting public or private roads. Buildings must be designed for close siting to facilitate street activity and encourage active transportation, with views from buildings directed to the street and public spaces rather than towards parking areas and neighbouring sites. 7.5.9. New development will be compatible with adjacent development. 7.5.10. Reverse frontage is generally not permitted. Where conditions exist that require reverse frontage, it shall be done to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 7.5.11. To support public transit and for reasons of public safety and convenience, primary building entrances shall be clearly visible and located on a public road frontage or onto public open spaces. 7.5.12. Access from sidewalks and public open space areas to primary building entrances shall be convenient and direct, with minimum changes in grade to increase accessibility for people who are mobility challenged. 19 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page108 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 7.5.13. Architectural styles of individual dwelling units shall complement each other. The various architectural forms within the community shall provide for a harmonious mix of distinctive architecture, which may incorporate both traditional/heritage and modern influences. It is important that the architectural form and style complement the design of the public realm. 7.5.14. All major rooftop mechanical structures or fixtures including satellite dishes and communications antenna shall be suitably screened and integrated with the building, where feasible. Parapets may be utilized to accommodate such screening. 7.5.15. Air conditioning units, utility metres, and similar features should not be visible from the public realm and well integrated, recessed, and screened. 7.5.16. To minimize disruptions to the safety and attractiveness of the Collector Road, a system of rear lanes may provide the primary access for on -site parking and servicing functions. 7.5.17. To enhance the quality and safety of the streetscapes throughout the Secondary Plan Area, the construction of parking lots which occupy significant proportions of the at -grade frontage of public roads shall not be permitted. 7.5.18. To reduce the visual impact of surface parking and to increase opportunities for at grade amenity areas the provision of structured parking shall be encouraged for higher density forms of development in the High Density, Medium Density, and Neighbourhood Centre designations. Where it is not feasible to locate parking in structures either below or above grade, parking should be located to the rear of the principal buildings or within the interior side yard. Appropriate landscaping and screening measures shall be provided. 7.5.19. Loading, servicing and other functional elements are encouraged to be integrated within the building envelope. Where this is not possible, these elements shall be carefully sited to minimize conflicts with adjoining uses and screened from view to avoid visual impact to the public realm or surrounding residential areas. 7.5.20. Areas for storage, waste, and recycling shall be integrated within a building envelope. 20 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page109 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT Private Amenities 7.5.21. New multi -unit residential development shall provide shared space for both indoor and outdoor amenities. 7.5.22. Courtyards and privately owned publicly -accessible amenities shall have at least two points of pedestrian access. 7.5.23. The design and location of pedestrian entrances to courtyards and privately owned publicly -accessible amenities shall be clearly identifiable as public to encourage public use through their siting and the use of design elements. Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities 7.5.24. The Municipality considers accessibility for persons with disabilities in all land - use planning and development decisions. All development shall comply with the accessibility requirements as set out by the Ontario Building Code and the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design 7.5.25. All development, with a focus on streetscapes, parks and open spaces, parking lots and other publicly accessible areas, shall include Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles, including: a. Adequate lighting, visibility, and opportunities for informal surveillance shall be provided for all walkways, parking lots, garages, playgrounds, and outdoor amenity areas; b. Clear sight lines, allowing views from one end of a walkway to the other; c. Appropriate landscaping, but avoiding landscaping that might create blind spots or hiding places; d. Adequate fencing and fenestration; e. Clear signage that delineates permitted use and speed of travel; and f. Streetscape and building design that promotes visual overlook through the strategic placement of entrances and windows. 21 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page110 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 8.0 ENCOURAGING HOUSING DIVERSITY 8.1 Objectives 8.1.1. Provide for a range and mix of housing opportunities, choices, and accessibility for all income levels and needs. 8.1.2. Provide for a range of affordability, consistent with targets established by the Municipality. 8.1.3. Plan for "age -in -place" facilities within the community that anticipate changing housing needs for an aging population. 8.1.4. Ensure the distribution of housing types provides equal opportunity to access goods and services located in the community and beyond. 8.1.5. Provide appropriate transitions in housing forms of various heights and densities. 8.2 General Policies 8.2.1. The policies of this Plan and Section 6 of the Official Plan are intended to facilitate the provision of a broad range and mix of housing opportunities in appropriate locations in the Secondary Plan Area. 8.2.2. Where appropriate, private, public, and non-profit housing developments designed to provide housing options for seniors are encouraged, including small ownership dwellings, higher density condominium dwellings, buildings with rental units, as well as retirement and assisted living facilities that facilitate "aging -in -place". 8.2.3. Provide a broad range of housing forms, unit sizes, and tenure to meet the needs of a diverse population and households of various sizes, incomes, and age compositions. 8.2.4. Residential development abutting the NHS shall be oriented and developed in a manner that is compatible, complimentary, and supportive of the natural heritage features and ecological functions of the system. 8.2.5. Views to key landmarks and natural features shall be maintained and created through the layout of the street network, the creation and reinforcement of the 22 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page111 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT parks and open space network, the establishment and landscaping of gateways, the siting of buildings, and the design of sites. 8.2.6. Individual site access for residential uses adjacent to any Arterial Road shall be discouraged. Residential uses fronting on an Arterial Road or Collector Road may be developed on rear lanes. Window streets or flankage lots are permitted. Noise attenuation fencing will be discouraged along Arterial Roads. 8.2.7. Development within the Secondary Plan Area shall be developed in accordance with the urban design policies of this Secondary Plan. The Sustainable Development Guidelines shall accompany this Plan and be used as guidance in the interpretation and implementation of the Secondary Plan's policies. Affordable Housing 8.2.8. Affordable housing should be located where there is access to public transit. 8.2.9. Affordable housing, including community housing, supportive housing, and other types of subsidized non -market housing units, is encouraged to be integrated within neighbourhoods and combined in developments that also provide market housing to deliver opportunities for a range of housing tenures and prices that support diversity. 8.2.10. New affordable housing and purpose-built rental housing should incorporate barrier -free, universal or flex design features in both common and living areas. 8.2.11. The Municipality should collaborate with the Region of Durham and public and non-profit community housing providers to encourage a supply of subsidized non -market housing units to be included within the housing mix in the Secondary Plan Area. 8.2.12. To support the provision of affordable housing units, the Municipality will explore other potential incentives such as reduced or deferred development charges, reduced application fees, grants, and loans, to encourage the development of affordable housing units. The reduction or deferral of Development Charges shall be done in consultation with the Region of Durham. The Municipality will also encourage the Region of Durham, the Provincial and Federal governments to consider financial incentives for affordable housing. 23 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page112 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 8.2.13. As an incentive for the provision of affordable housing, as defined in Section 24.2 of the Official Plan, reductions in the minimum parking requirement under the Zoning By-law may be considered by the Municipality on a site -by - site basis where housing that is affordable is provided as part of a development proposal. 8.2.14. To facilitate the development of affordable housing units within the Secondary Plan Area and in the Municipality, the Landowners Group in the Secondary Plan Area shall provide either land in accordance with Policy 8.2.15 or a contribution of funds to the Municipality in accordance with Policy 8.2.16 for the development of affordable, public, or non-profit housing in the community. 8.2.15. The land to be conveyed as provided in Policy 8.2.14 shall have an approximate size of 1.5 hectares, be designated for residential development within the Secondary Plan Area, be fully serviced, and be gratuitously conveyed free and clear of encumbrances. Conveyance shall occur before the final approval of the first development application within the Secondary Plan Area. 8.2.16. The contribution of funds as provided in Policy 8.2.14 will be through a contribution agreement to be negotiated between the Municipality and the Landowners Group. The first half of the required contribution of funds shall be paid by the Landowners Group upon the approval of the Secondary Plan and the remainder of the contribution shall be paid upon the final approval of the first development application in the Secondary Plan Area at a rate of $400.00 per unit. 8.2.17. The Municipality will give priority to development applications that include affordable housing units that are being funded by federal and provincial government programs, community housing providers and other non-profit groups, or the Region of Durham. Live/Work Units 8.2.18. The Municipality encourages live -work opportunities for combined residential and personal services, or office uses, where appropriate, to facilitate home - based employment, which ensures proximity between housing and jobs and provides a mix of uses. 8.2.19. Live -work units provide higher densities to help support transit systems and a diverse range of services within a convenient walking distance of residents. 24 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page113 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 8.2.20. Live -work development is subject to the following: a. Permitted within street and block townhouses; b. The first floor within any live -work unit may be used for commercial, personal services, and office uses, and be oriented towards a public road; and c. Off-street parking in front of buildings is prohibited. Parking should be accommodated through on -street parking or in driveways located off a rear lane. Accessory Dwelling Units 8.2.21. Within the Secondary Plan Area, one accessory dwelling unit is permitted within a detached, semi-detached, or townhouse dwelling, and one accessory dwelling unit is permitted within a detached accessory structure subject to the provisions of the Zoning By-law and other relevant regulations. 8.2.22. Accessory dwelling units must be registered with the Municipality. 9.0 CELEBRATING OUR CULTURAL HERITAGE 9.1 Objectives 9.1.1. Preserve and enhance existing cultural heritage features including significant vegetation, topographic features, scenic views, and archaeological resources to promote the ecological restoration of these features. 9.1.2. Integrate the existing cultural heritage features into the design of the community and the public realm as aesthetic amenities. 9.2 Cultural Heritage 9.2.1. The conservation and enhancement of significant cultural heritage resources shall be consistent with the provisions of Chapter 8 in the Official Plan and all relevant Provincial legislation and Regional policy directives. 9.2.2. Create opportunities for cultural heritage landscapes to be incorporated into the design of open spaces and parks. High quality landscape architecture will ensure that these spaces include public art where possible and appropriate grading, paving, and planting materials that celebrate the landscape context. 25 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page114 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 10.0 MOBILITY AND ROADS 10.1. Objectives 10.1.1. Plan for an active transportation system that is highly integrated and connected within the community, the adjacent communities, the Municipality, and to transportation systems that serve the broader Region. 10.1.2. Provide a variety of economical, safe, and accessible mobility options through the provision of a highly interconnected network of roads, sidewalks, bicycle lanes, trails, multi -use paths, and a public transit system to ensure all persons have transportation options while reducing automobile dependence. 10.1.3. Ensure all roads are designed to consider context and to utilize complete streets design principles to support users of all ages and abilities. 10.1.4. Establish a connected transportation system that creates multiple direct routes throughout the community. 10.1.5. Create walkable and connected neighbourhoods with destinations within a walking distance of approximately 400 to 800 metres (5-10 minute walk) of most residents. 10.1.6. Ensure all roads are designed as important components of the public realm to provide a network that is appealing for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. 10.2. General Mobility Policies 10.2.1. The transportation network serving the Secondary Plan Area will be designed with complete streets principles to accommodate multiple modes of travel such as motorists, transit users, cyclists, and pedestrians. Prioritize active modes of transportation and the needs of the most vulnerable users. 10.2.2. The provision of transportation services shall be consistent with Section 19 of the Official Plan and shall have regard for the standards established through the Sustainable Development Guidelines. 26 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page115 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 10.2.3. All road designs shall be consistent with Appendix C, Table C-2 of the Official Plan and confirmed through a Traffic Impact Study submitted as part of a development application. 10.2.4. The intent of the Secondary Plan is to develop a connected grid -like multi - modal transportation network while recognizing constraints such as natural areas that create barriers which limit the achievement of a completely connected street network. 10.2.5. Final route alignments and requirements for roads, trails, and other components of the active transportation system shall be designed according to detailed planning and engineering studies at the time of applications for site plan approval or draft plan of subdivision. This work shall be to the satisfaction of the Municipality in consultation with other agencies having jurisdiction. 10.2.6. The final location and alignment of a Private Road crossing Rickard Creek shall be assessed as part of an Environmental Impact Study required at the time of applications for site plan approval or draft plan of subdivision. This work shall be to the satisfaction of the Municipality in consultation with other agencies having jurisdiction. 10.2.7. All roads will be designed as important components of the public realm, providing a network that is appealing for pedestrians, cyclists, motorists and in the longer term, transit users. The transportation network shall be designed to provide vistas and view sheds to public parks and open spaces and to the NHS to assist in the creation of a sense of place. 10.2.8. Minor revisions to transportation routes to incorporate design features such as streetscaping and bikeways may be made without amendment to this Secondary Plan, provided that the principles of permeability and inter - connectivity are maintained to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 10.2.9. The Ministry of Transportation requires that future buildings, roads, municipal services, and essential parking be set back a minimum of 14 metres from the Highway 401 right-of-way. To accommodate a potential widening of Highway 401, while maintaining the desired streetscape, minimum building setbacks and municipal service and utility easements may be required. 27 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page116 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 10.3. Arterial Roads 10.3.1. Bennett Road runs north south and forms the western boundary of the Secondary Plan Area. Bennett Road is identified in the Official Plan as a Type C Arterial Road. 10.3.2. Driveway access on Bennett Road shall be limited. 10.3.3. All development within the Secondary Plan Area that directly abuts an Arterial Road shall provide appropriate buffering, landscaped open space, and shall consider the aesthetic function of the corridor. 10.4. Collector Roads 10.4.1. A Collector Road will serve as the main access road for the community and will extend east from Bennett Road and terminate at the private road for the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community. 10.4.2. The Collector Road will have a right-of-way width of 23.0 metres. 10.4.3. The Collector Road will have boulevards on both sides of the pavement and will accommodate a grassed verge with street trees. A multi -use path shall be accommodated within the boulevard on one side of the collector and a sidewalk will be accommodated on the other. 10.4.4. Roundabouts will be encouraged to be used at any intersection with a Collector Road. 10.5. Local Roads 10.5.1. A conceptual Local Road pattern is identified on Schedule A to this Secondary Plan. Changes to the identified Local Road pattern shall not require an amendment to this Secondary Plan, provided that the principles of permeability and inter -connectivity are achieved to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 10.5.2. Local Roads will have an interconnected layout with multiple route choices to Collector Roads where transit routes and commercial areas are most commonly located. 28 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page117 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 10.5.3. Local Roads are expected to have a right-of-way width of up to a maximum of 20.0 metres. 10.5.4. Local Roads will be designed to accommodate on -street parking and landscaping in the boulevards. Sidewalks are encouraged on both sides of a Local Road. 10.5.5. The location and design requirements for Local Roads will be confirmed and implemented through subsequent development approvals. 10.6. Rear Lanes 10.6.1. Rear Lanes are permitted and encouraged to support safe and attractive roads by eliminating the need for driveways and street -facing garages. 10.6.2. To minimize disruptions to the safety and attractiveness of the Arterial and Collector Roads, a system of Rear Lanes may provide the primary access for on -site parking and servicing functions. 10.6.3. Rear Lanes can provide alternative pedestrian routes through a community and shall provide a safe environment for pedestrian and vehicle travel. 10.6.4. Public utilities may be located within public Rear Lanes subject to functional and design standards established by the Municipality. 10.6.5. Rear lanes shall be designed in accordance with the road classification criteria in Appendix C, Table C-2 of the Clarington Official Plan and include the following design standards: a. Lanes shall allow two-way travel and incorporate a setback on either side of the right-of-way to the adjacent garage wall; b. Lanes shall provide a minimum pavement width of 6.5 metres; C. Lanes shall provide access for service and maintenance vehicles for required uses as deemed necessary by the Municipality and may include enhanced laneway widths and turning radii to accommodate municipal vehicles including access for snowplows, garbage trucks, and emergency vehicles where required; d. Lanes shall be clear of overhead obstruction and shall be free from overhanging balconies, trees, and other encroachments; 29 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page118 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT e. Lanes shall intersect with public roads; f. No Region of Durham infrastructure shall be permitted; g. Lanes should be graded to channelize snow -melt and runoff; h. The design of lanes shall incorporate appropriate elements of low impact design including permeable paving where sufficient drainage exists; Lanes should be prioritized where development fronts onto an Arterial or Collector Road network; Access to loading areas should be provided from rear lanes; k. Appropriate lighting shall be provided to contribute to the safe function of the roadway, as well as the safe and appropriate lighting of the pedestrian realm; and Lighting should be downcast to reduce light pollution. 10.7. Private Roads Private Roads are not under the jurisdiction of the Municipality and include condominium roads providing access to units within a condominium development. Private Roads will be the responsibility of the landowner to ensure that such private roads are adequate for traffic, including fire protection and emergency vehicles. 10.7.1. Private Roads shall have a minimum right -of way width of 10.0 metres with a minimum paved surface width of 6.5 metres. 10.7.2. A minimum 1.5 metre landscaped utility corridor shall be provided on either side of the paved portion of the Private Road. 10.7.3. Sidewalks are required on at least one side of a Private Road and may be located within the utility easement. 10.7.4. The use of permeable materials should be considered in areas where sufficient drainage exists. 10.7.5. Private Roads shall be designed to meet the Municipality's design standards and specifications. 30 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page119 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 10.8. Controlled Access Gate and Road 10.8.1. Access to the existing Wilmot Creek Adult Lifestyle Community will be provided by a Private (land lease) Road and a controlled access gate and will be the responsibility of the landowner to maintain. 10.8.2. Special entry paving and signage will identify the Private Road and controlled access gate. Landscaping and fencing will provide a delineation for lands that comprise the entry to the existing community. 10.8.3. The design and function of the Private Road and controlled access gate will ensure ease of access and privacy for the existing residents. 10.9. Roundabouts 10.9.1 The Municipality shall consider the following as general design policies for Roundabouts: a. Roundabouts are intended to calm traffic and direct traffic flows without requiring stop signs at intersections; b. The design of a Roundabout should prioritize the safe movement of pedestrians and bicycles; and C. Whenever Roundabouts are used, they should incorporate appropriate landscape features and public art while ensuring that clear sightlines are maintained for drivers to promote safety. 10.10. Public Transit 10.10.1. Transit facilities should be integrated early and appropriately throughout The Secondary Plan Area. Durham Region Transit shall be invited to all development pre -consultation meetings to advise on transit requirements. 10.10.2. To facilitate the creation of a transit supportive urban structure, the following measures shall be reflected in development proposals, including the subdivision of land: a. Transit -supportive densities in keeping with municipal density targets; b. Provision of a road pattern and active transportation network that provides for direct pedestrian access to future transit routes and stops; 31 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page120 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT C. Transit stops located in close proximity to activity nodes and building entrances; and d. Provision for transit stops and incorporation of bus -bays where appropriate into road design requirements. 10.11. Active Transportation 10.11.1. The active transportation network provides opportunities for active transportation and enhances mobility by providing for an alternative to local automotive transportation. The active transportation network includes both on- and off-street facilities including sidewalks, trails, and multi -use paths. 10.11.2. Active transportation within the Secondary Plan Area shall be consistent with the policies of Section 18.4 of the Official Plan, this Plan, and be in accordance with the Sustainable Development Guidelines. 10.11.3. The active transportation network will connect to the road network and all major destinations, such as the Neighbourhood Centre, parks, community gardens, and the existing Waterfront Trail in order to provide convenient and safe access to facilitate travel by alternate modes of transportation. 10.11.4. Active transportation routes will include signage and streetscaping elements such as trees, landscaping, and benches to support pedestrian and cyclist comfort and safety and enhanced accessibility for all residents. Trails and Multi -Use Paths 10.11.5. The trails system is to provide both a recreational and utilitarian function. Accordingly, connections will be made to the road network, the Neighbourhood Centre, parks, community gardens, and the existing Waterfront Trail. 10.11.6. Trail and multi -use path locations will be based on each site's sensitivity in order to minimize environmental impacts. The trails system may include trails and multi -use paths along stormwater management facilities, open spaces, the road system, the outer edge of the vegetation protection zone, and within parks. 32 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 121 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 10.11.7. Trail and multi -use path crossings of roads shall ideally be located at an intersection where users can be afforded a safe and protected crossing. Trail and multi -use path crossings at a mid -block location along a road shall be provided a signed trail crossing to alert drivers of the likely presence of trail users. 10.11.8. Trails and multi -use paths will be designed to accommodate a range of users and abilities. Curb -cuts and other safety measures and design elements must be provided to improve access at road crossings. The use of permeable materials may be considered for trail development in areas where sufficient drainage exists. Trails and multi -use paths with asphalt surfaces may be incorporated into the trails system to address accessibility and active transportation needs. 10.11.9. Trail and multi -use path locations shall be assessed as part of an Environmental Impact Study, where appropriate. 10.11.10.Trails and multi -use paths located in proximity to sensitive natural features, or adjacent to stormwater management facilities should incorporate interpretive signage at various locations to promote stewardship initiatives that will protect and enhance the features and functions of the natural environment. 10.11.11.The Municipality may require trail corridors to be dedicated for public purposes as a condition of development approval. 10.11.12.Trail and multi -use path connections and crossings shall be subject to the following policies: a. Trail and multi -use path connections bisecting the NHS should be limited in order to promote the preservation and protection to the ecological integrity and function of the features comprising the NHS; b. Where feasible, road crossings over creeks should be utilized for trail or and multi -use path crossings; C. Where creek crossings are unavoidable, existing crossing locations can be considered however, the new crossing should not use existing non -permitted culverts. Creek crossings will need to be designed to promote fish passage, passage of flows, as well as minimize impacts to the riparian area; and 33 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page122 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT d. The location of trails and multi -use paths should be designed to avoid interfering with the meander belt of the creeks. 10.11.13.Additional trails and multi -use paths may be identified through the development approvals process to augment the trail system identified on Schedule A. 10.11.14.A future multi -use path on Bennett Road will provide a pedestrian and cycling connection along the western boundary of the Secondary Plan Area and will link to the Waterfront Trail. 10.12. Parking 10.12.1. On -street parking will be encouraged at appropriate locations on all roads in order to provide for anticipated parking needs and to assist in calming traffic movement and thereby enhancing pedestrian safety. 10.12.2. Off-street parking for all uses shall be adequate to serve the use. 10.12.3. Subject to the findings and recommendations of an Internal Traffic/Parking Study, on -street parking may be approved at certain locations for specified times of the day to satisfy a portion of the parking requirements of adjacent non-residential uses. 10.12.4. Bicycle parking should be located near main entrances, be visible to the public, sited to avoid conflicts with pedestrians, and be located in well -lit areas. 10.12.5. Multi -unit residential buildings shall provide long-term, secure locations for bicycle parking for residents and additional short term visitor parking. 10.13. Railways 10.13.1 All proposed development adjacent to railway corridors shall be consistent with the policies of Section 19.7 of the Official Plan. 10.13.2 Development adjacent to railway corridors shall include safety and mitigation measures, such as setbacks, berms, and security fencing, required by approved noise and vibration studies to the satisfaction of the Municipality and in consultation with the appropriate rail authority. 34 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page123 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 11.0 PARKS AND COMMUNITY AMENITIES An important aspect of building a healthy and vibrant community is the provision of a range of passive and active public parks and open space areas. The policies of this Section are intended to provide an integrated system of municipally owned Neighbourhood Parks and Parkettes, and other publicly accessible open space areas, trails, and pathways within the community. 11.1. Objectives 11.1.1. Provide for a diverse range of parks, open spaces, and community amenities to encourage residents to be physically active and socially engaged. 11.1.2. Ensure parks and open spaces are visible, accessible, and linked. 11.1.3. Ensure parks include a full array of opportunities for outdoor festivals, recreation, and play, as well as quiet contemplation. 11.1.4. Locate parks and other community amenities to promote safe and convenient access by walking and cycling. 11.2. General Policies for Parks 11.2.1. Parks shall be provided as part of a connected parks and open space system and broader public realm network that includes roads, trails, and privately owned publicly accessible spaces. 11.2.2. Wherever feasible, lands designated Environmental Protection and Green Space shall be incorporated into the parks and open space system for leisure uses and compatible, passive recreational functions. Such lands shall not be included as part of the parkland dedication requirements identified in this Secondary Plan. 11.2.3. Parks shall be designed to minimize any potential negative impacts on the residential uses. 11.2.4. Residential and commercial uses backing onto Parks shall be minimized. 11.2.5. Park and open space design shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Sustainable Development Guidelines and shall consider the following: 35 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 124 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT a. Have regard for Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles and the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA); b. New trees and landscaping within parks should be of a diverse, robust species selection, drought tolerant, contribute to the tree canopy objectives of the Municipality and Region, and where possible, salvaged from the site or the local area; C. Bicycle and pedestrian routes to, and within, parks should be accessible, safe, and visible; d. Bicycle parking should be provided within all parks, regardless of park size; e. Parks, in general, should be accessible and accommodate a range of age groups. Co -locating physical activity spaces for children and adults promotes physical activity in different age groups; f. The illumination of parks, including parking areas and playing fields, shall be directed away from the Environmental Protection Area to minimize disturbance to wildlife, to the greatest extent feasible; and g. The inclusion of public art in parks, facilities, and pedestrian spaces is encouraged. 11.2.6. Dedication of lands for Neighbourhood Parks and Parkettes shall be in accordance with the Official Plan. Privately owned publicly -accessible spaces are not accepted as part of the parkland dedication. 11.2.7. Areas conveyed for parkland purposes will be programmable lands. 11.3. Neighbourhood Parks 11.3.1 Neighbourhood Parks are shown on Schedule A. The precise size and location of Neighbourhood Parks shall be determined at the time of development review and approval, based on the parkland provision requirements of Section 18 of the Clarington Official Plan. 11.3.2 Neighbourhood Parks shall form the central focus of the overall Secondary Plan Area and shall: 36 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page125 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT a. Be centrally located and within 400 to 800 metres (5 to 10 minute walking distance) of all residential uses within the neighbourhood it is serving; b. Have a size of 1.5 to 3.0 hectares and be designed for passive and active recreational facilities such as playground equipment and active sports fields to meet the recreational needs of the neighbourhood residential area through detailed parks planning; C. Be integrated with other community facilities, where deemed appropriate by the Municipality; d. Have frontage on a Local and/or Collector Road, with a minimum 60 metres of continuous frontage; and e. Be connected and integrated with the broader NHS and active transportation routes shown on Schedule A to this Secondary Plan. The Neighbourhood Park shall be located beyond the feature and the associated vegetation protection zone. 11.4. Parkettes 11.4.1. Parkettes are shown on Schedule A. The precise number, size, and location of Parkettes shall be determined at the time of development review and approval, based on the parkland provision requirements of Section 18 of the Clarington Official Plan. 11.4.2. Parkettes are smaller scale parks, between 0.5 to 1.0 hectare in size, and are intended to provide passive open space areas, serve as focal points within sub -areas of each neighbourhood, and shall: a. Be easily accessible for residents within a 400 metre radius (5 minute walking distance); b. Be designed to have significant public exposure and access. Urban design options include surrounding the park with streets or fronting dwellings directly on to the parkette; C. Reflect the needs of surrounding residents including places to sit and socialize, junior play areas for children, and a significant tree canopy for shade; and 37 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page126 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT d. Be designed with 50 percent public frontage but may be less where other design alternatives achieve public view and access. Public frontage can be a public road, Hydro Corridor, or natural heritage features. 11.5. Privately Owned Publicly -Accessible Spaces 11.5.1. In addition to the publicly owned lands which form the Parks designation, development is encouraged to include privately owned publicly -accessible spaces that contribute to the sense of place in the community and the quality of the urban environment. 11.5.2. Privately owned publicly -accessible spaces can include public squares, plazas, courtyards, walkways and passages, atriums, arcades, and park -like spaces. They contribute to the urban environment by creating spaces for social interaction, adding to visual interest, improving mid -block permeability, and complementing adjacent land uses. 11.5.3. Public access to privately owned publicly -accessible spaces will be secured through the development approval process. 11.5.4. Privately owned publicly -accessible spaces shall be provided in the High Density Residential designation and the Neighbourhood Centre designation to enhance the Neighbourhood Centre's role as a primary gateway. 12.0 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS 12.1. Objectives 12.1.1 Support the mix and diversity of land uses in a compact, active transportation supportive development form to shorten distances between homes, workplaces, and amenities to meet resident's needs for daily living, throughout the year, and throughout an entire lifetime. 12.1.2 Realize an efficient urban community structure by achieving targets of a minimum of 50 people per gross hectare. 12.1.3 Locate the highest intensity of development and greatest mix of uses along the Highway 401 corridor and in the Neighbourhood Centre to foster access to commercial amenities and transit. 38 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page127 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 12.2. General Land Use Policies 12.2.1. The land use designations on Schedule A of this Secondary Plan and the policies of this section are designed to establish a distribution of land uses to ensure an appropriate mix of uses, heights, and densities in a manner which supports the creation of a sustainable and complete community. 12.2.2. The following land use designations apply within the Secondary Plan Area: a. Medium Density Residential; b. High Density Residential; Neighbourhood Centre; d. Environmental Protection Area; and e. Green Space. 12.2.3. Taller buildings will generally be located in close proximity to Highway 401 and Bennett Road, a major Arterial Road. 12.2.4. Development lots shall back onto the provincial highway and front onto a local internal street. Rear yards shall back onto the provincial highway. 12.2.5. Outdoor storage and loading areas in locations adjacent to Highway 401 shall be visually screened or appropriately located to reduce visibility to ensure these uses are not a distraction to the travelling public. 12.2.6. The Municipality will ensure, through the Implementing Zoning By-law, Conditions of Draft Plan Approval, Site Plan Agreement, and/or any other legally binding agreement acceptable to the Municipality, that potential adverse noise impacts from Highway 401 and the CN Railway shall include appropriate construction techniques and/or building materials that will mitigate potential adverse noise impacts. As a minimum, the dwellings should be constructed of brick veneer or masonry exterior wall construction and be provided with central air conditioning. 12.2.7. Physical noise mitigation measures (e.g., acoustic barriers) for residential and/or sensitive land uses adjacent to Highway 401 and the CN Railway line can be used. The height and design of any noise mitigation measures shall be determined by the Noise Feasibility Study to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 39 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page128 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 12.2.8. In recognition of the potential for noise impacts from the existing highway and railway, the Municipality will require that formal warning notices be included in all purchase and sale (or rental/lease) agreements and for registration on title for all properties or condominium units. 12.2.9. Drive -through facilities are not a permitted use in any land use designation. 12.2.10. Service stations are not a permitted use in any land use designation. 12.3. Medium Density Residential Designation Permitted Uses and Built Forms 12.3.1. The predominant use of lands within the Medium Density Residential designation are a mix of housing types and tenures in mid- and low-rise building forms. 12.3.2. Other uses, including small scale service uses, which are supportive of and compatible with residential uses, are also permitted in accordance with the Official Plan. 12.3.3. The following building types are permitted: a. Street townhouses; b. Block townhouses; C. Stacked townhouses; d. Special needs housing; e. Apartment buildings; and f. Other dwelling types that provide housing at the same or higher densities as those above. Height and Density 12.3.4. The height of any building shall be a minimum of 2 storeys and a maximum of 6 storeys. 12.3.5. Development on lands designated Medium Density Residential shall have a minimum net density of 40 units per net hectare. 40 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page129 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT Development Policies 12.3.6. Development shall provide a transition in height by locating less dense and lower scale buildings south of the main east -west Collector Road. 12.3.7. In Medium Density Residential areas, the following policies shall apply: a. Dwelling units shall have their main entrance visible and accessible from the public street; b. Garages are encouraged to be accessed from a rear lane; C. Where garages are located at the front of the building facing a street, the garage shall be integrated and not protrude beyond the main front wall of the dwelling unit; d. Driveways shall not exceed the width of the garage; e. Front yards shall have an appropriate amount soft landscaping to create an attractive and vegetated streetscape and allow permeability for stormwater; f. Buildings on corner lots or abutting parks shall have windows, materials and architectural treatments consistent with the front elevation where sides or flankage of buildings is visible; g. Front and exterior side yard porches shall be encouraged; h. Outdoor amenity areas in the form of second floor decks or rooftop patios should be considered for townhouses with an attached garage in the rear; and Stacked townhouses and low-rise apartment units should be provided with private amenity space in the form of a balcony for the upper -level units, or an at -grade or sunken courtyard for the lower -level units. 12.3.8. Pedestrian walkways, including mid -block pedestrian connections, should be provided at regular intervals between townhouse blocks to provide safe, direct access between dwelling entrances, the public street, parking areas, and amenity areas. 41 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page130 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 12.4. High Density Residential Designation Permitted Uses and Built Forms 12.4.1. The predominant use of lands within the High Density Residential designation are mid -rise building forms. 12.4.2. The following building types are permitted: a. Apartment buildings; b. Special needs housing; and C. Other dwelling types that provide housing at the same or higher densities as those above. Height and Density 12.4.3. Apartment buildings adjacent to Highway 401 and east of the Environmental Protection Area will have a minimum height of 6 storeys and a maximum height of 8 storeys. 12.4.4. Development on lands designated High Density Residential shall have a minimum net density of 60 units per net hectare. Development Policies 12.4.5. The highest and most dense forms of development shall be located along the Highway 401 corridor. The scale of buildings adjacent to Highway 401 shall be compatible and sensitively integrated with surrounding residential. Development transition requirements shall be met following the policies in Section 7.4 of this Plan. 12.4.6. The boundary between areas designated Medium Density Residential and High Density Residential shall generally be a public street with buildings of each designation fronting onto the street. 12.4.7. In High Density Residential areas, the following policies shall apply: a. The siting and massing of the buildings should be compatible and harmonious with that of adjacent developments. Buildings shall be compatible and sensitively integrated with the surrounding residential 42 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 131 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT uses in terms of building mass, height, setbacks, orientation, privacy, landscaping, and visual impact; b. Side and rear elevations visible from the public realm shall have attractive fagade treatments using high quality materials; C. Pedestrian walkways, including mid -block pedestrian connections, should provide safe, direct access between dwelling entrances, the public street, parking areas and amenity areas; d. Apartment buildings should have a clearly articulated base, middle, and top, through the use of horizontal or vertical extrusions, projections, or changes in material; e. Balconies on all storeys above grade are encouraged. Inset or partially inset balconies to offer greater privacy and shelter from wind, reduce the building bulk, and minimize the impact of shadow on other amenity spaces below; f. Bicycle parking and storage should be provided for apartment buildings; and g. Locate visitor drop off areas at the side or rear of buildings with lane or private drive access. 12.4.8. Multi -unit residential development shall provide shared space for both indoor and outdoor amenities. 12.5. Neighbourhood Centre Designation Permitted Uses and Built Forms 12.5.1. The Neighbourhood Centre Designation provides opportunities for commercial and residential uses that benefit from Arterial Road frontage along Bennett Road. The Neighbourhood Centre will incorporate a combination of any two or more of residential, cultural, entertainment, recreational, offices, restaurants, retail, and service commercial uses. 12.5.2. The following building types are permitted: a. Live/work units; b. Mixed -use buildings; 43 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page132 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT C. Commercial retail and service use buildings; and d. Grocery stores/supermarkets Height and Density 12.5.3. Commercial and mixed -use built forms shall have a minimum height of 2 storeys and a maximum of 6 storeys. 12.5.4. Development on lands designated Neighbourhood Centre shall have a minimum net density of 40 units per net hectare. Development Policies 12.5.5. The mix of uses in a Neighbourhood Centre shall be compatible and sensitively integrated with the surrounding residential uses. Development transition requirements shall be met following the policies in Section 7.4 of this Plan. 12.5.6. In the Neighbourhood Centre, the following policies shall apply: a. Use prominent built form to address the primary gateway location at Bennett Road. Create paired corner buildings on either side of the Collector Road to emphasize a sense of entry; b. Mixed -use buildings may include commercial and office uses at grade and multi -unit residential above or behind. Ground floors shall be designed to be appealing to pedestrians and include uses that are more active in terms of pedestrian traffic, such as commercial/retail, personal service, and restaurant type uses on the ground floor; C. Ensure primary entrances to buildings are clearly visible and located on a public road or onto a public open space for reasons of public safety and convenience; d. For stand-alone commercial uses, minimize the building footprint by providing a multi-storey building in order to deliver compact form and conserve land; and e. Ensure consistent high quality building design and architectural elements on all building elevations, particularly on facades in public view or backing onto residential properties. 44 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page133 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 12.5.7. Cultural, entertainment, recreational, offices, restaurants, retail, and service commercial uses shall be permitted in the first two floors of a mixed -use building. 12.5.8. Stand-alone 2 storey commercial buildings are permitted if a mixed -use building is also within the Neighbourhood Centre designation. 12.5.9. Ground floors containing commercial space shall have a minimum height of 4.5 metres. 12.5.10. Surface parking lots should be screened from view from roads, open spaces, and adjacent residential areas with low fencing, architectural features, landscaping and/or other mitigating design measures, such as lowered parking surfaces with landscaped buffers. 12.6. Environmental Protection Area Designation 12.6.1. Lands designated Environmental Protection Area shall be subject to the provisions of Section 14.4 of the Official Plan. 12.6.2. No development shall be permitted in Environment Protection Areas, except low intensity recreation, and uses related to conservation, flood, or erosion control projects. 12.6.3. The natural heritage features and their associated vegetation protection zones within the Secondary Plan Area are identified as Environmental Protection Area on Schedule A to this Secondary Plan. 12.6.4. The biodiversity, ecological function, and connectivity of the Environmental Protection Area shall be protected, maintained, restored or, where possible, improved for the long-term, recognizing linkages between natural heritage features and areas, surface water features, and ground water features. 12.6.5. The delineation of the boundary of lands designated as Environmental Protection Area are approximate and shall be detailed through appropriate studies prepared as part of the review of development applications in accordance with the policies of this Secondary Plan and the Clarington Official Plan. Any resulting changes to the boundaries of the Environmental Protection Area designation resulting from the recommendations of an 45 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page134 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT Environmental Impact Study shall not require an amendment to this Secondary Plan. 12.6.6. Access to Environmental Protection Areas and associated areas through the development of public trails will be undertaken in a manner which conserves their ecological integrity. 12.7. Green Space Designation 12.7.1 The Green Space Designation shall be subject to the provisions of Section 14.7 of the Official Plan. 12.7.2 A Hydro One Corridor is located within the Green Space Designation and the lands within this designation shall be subject to the provisions of Section 21.3 of the Official Plan and confirmed through application to Hydro One through the Provincial Secondary Land Use Program (PSLUP) 13.0 SERVICING 13.1. Municipal Services 13.1.1. All new development within the Secondary Planning area shall proceed based on the sequential extension of full municipal services in accordance with the municipal capital works program. 13.1.2. Any Regional infrastructure required to support the development of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood is subject to the annual budget and Business Planning Process. 13.1.3. The Municipality will work with the landowners and the Regional Municipality of Durham to develop a plan for the phasing of extensions to the existing services within the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Area. A phasing plan shall be prepared as part of a Functional Servicing Report by development proponents at the time an application for draft plan of subdivision is submitted. 46 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page135 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 13.2. Stormwater Management 13.2.1. Stormwater Management facilities are conceptually shown on Schedule A and may be permitted in all land use designations, except for the Environmental Protection Area designation. 13.2.2. The number and location of the stormwater management facility symbols may be changed without an amendment to this Plan. The exact location, number, and size of the facilities will be determined through a Functional Servicing Report and in accordance with Section 20 of the Official Plan. Stormwater management facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of the Sustainable Development Guidelines attached as Appendix A to this Secondary Plan. 13.2.3. Development in the Secondary Plan Area shall incorporate "Low Impact Development" best practices and green infrastructure to minimize runoff, reduce water pollution, and protect groundwater resources quality and maintain pre -development groundwater levels as measures in addition to more traditional stormwater management systems and facilities. These measures may include, but are not limited to, porous pavements, bioretention basins, enhanced swales, at -source infiltration, greywater re -use, green roofs, rain gardens, and alternative filtration systems such as treatment trains and water conservation measures, subject to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 13.2.4. Stormwater management facilities will be designed and located to be key features within the community contributing to the appearance and ambience of the neighbourhood, while achieving functional objectives related to flow moderation, erosion control, and water quality. 13.2.5. Stormwater management facilities will blend with the natural landscape. Geometric forms and standard slope gradients will be avoided in favour of organic shapes and landform grading designed to replicate natural landforms in the area. Inlet and outlet structures will be concealed using a combination of planting, grading, and natural stone. The ponds will be designed and planted with native upland, flood tolerant shoreline and aquatic species to provide enhanced wildlife habitat. Facilities will be designed to include trails, overlooks, and interpretive signage so that they are an integral part of the parks and open space system. 47 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page136 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 13.2.6. Stormwater management for the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood will be designed in such a manner that pre -development water balance conditions are maintained for the Secondary Plan Area including all wetlands, tributaries and other natural heritage features requiring the maintenance of water balance conditions. A detailed water balance will be required as part of a stormwater management plan submitted at the time of a development application. 13.3. Utilities 13.3.1. The Municipality shall participate in discussions with utility providers such as hydroelectric power, communications/telecommunications facilities and utilities, broadband fibre optics, and natural gas to ensure that sufficient infrastructure is or will be in place to serve the Secondary Plan Area. 13.3.2. The Municipality shall promote utilities to be planned for and installed in common trenches, where feasible, in a coordinated and integrated manner in order to be more efficient, cost effective, and minimize disruption. 13.3.3. Utility services shall be developed to be compatible with the general character of the surrounding uses and minimize visual impact. The Municipality will encourage utility providers to consider innovative methods of containing utility services on or within streetscape features such as gateways, lamp posts, transit shelters, etc., when determining appropriate locations for large utility equipment and utility cluster sites. 13.3.4. As per Policy 12.6.2, a Hydro One Corridor runs through and south of the Secondary Plan Area. The corridor is classified as a 500 kV Transmission Line. Consultation with Hydro One is required through the development application process to confirm the permitted uses within the hydro right-of-way. All applications are subject to Hydro One's clearance. 14.0 IMPLEMENTATION 14.1 General 14.1.1. This Secondary Plan shall be implemented in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act, other applicable Provincial legislation, and the provisions of the Official Plan. 48 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page137 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 14.1.2. Approval of development applications shall be conditional upon commitments from the appropriate authorities and the proponents of development to the timing and funding of the required road and transportation facilities, parks, and recreation facilities. These works shall be provided for in the subdivision and site plan agreements. Phasing of the development, based on the completion of the external road works, may be required by the Municipality of Clarington. 14.1.3. Approval of development applications shall also be conditional upon commitments from the appropriate authorities and the proponents of development to the timing and funding of required stormwater management, sanitary sewer, and water supply facilities. These works shall be provided for in subdivision and site plan agreements. Phasing of development, based on the completion of external sewer and water services, may be implemented if required by the Municipality of Clarington. 14.1.4. Development within the Secondary Plan Area shall be consistent with programs intended to reduce the consumption of energy and water and to promote waste reduction. An Energy Conservation and Sustainability Plan will be prepared by development proponents to outline the specific commitments for sustainability. 14.1.5. The Sustainable Development Guidelines contained as an appendix to this Secondary Plan provide specific guidelines for both the public and private sectors. They indicate the Municipality of Clarington's expectations with respect to the character, quality, and form of development in the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan. The Demonstration Plan illustrates the planning principles that are inherent to the Secondary Plan. It is one example of how the Secondary Plan might be implemented within the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood. The Sustainable Development Guidelines and Demonstration Plan have been approved by Council and do not require an amendment to implement an alternative design solution at anytime in the future. 14.1.6. All development within the Secondary Plan Area shall be in accordance with the Sustainable Development Guidelines. Adjustments and further refinements to the Sustainable Development Guidelines are anticipated and may be considered at the development stage through submission of an Urban Design Brief which demonstrates how the general design approach in the Sustainable Development Guidelines is being achieved, or the rationale for the deviation, to the satisfaction of the Municipality and Region. 49 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page138 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT 14.1.7. The Secondary Plan recognizes that comprehensive planning requires the equitable sharing amongst landowners of costs associated with the development of land. It is a policy of this Secondary Plan that prior to the approval of any draft plan of subdivision, applicants/landowners shall have entered into appropriate cost sharing agreements which establish the means by which the costs (including Region of Durham costs) of developing the property are to be shared. The Municipality may also require, as a condition of draft approval, that proof be provided to the Municipality that landowners have met their obligations under the relevant cost sharing agreements prior to registration of a plan of subdivision. 14.2 Required Studies and Reports General 14.2.1. Prior to the approval of development applications within parts of, or the entire, Secondary Plan Area, studies, plans, and assessments shall be completed in accordance with Clarington Official Plan and Durham Region Official Plan policies and requirements. 14.2.2. Additional study requirements may be identified by the Municipality as development within the Secondary Plan Area proceeds. 14.2.3. Every development application, as part of complete application and updated at the time of final approval, shall be accompanied by a policy implementation monitoring report that shall include details regarding the following, if applicable: a. For the development application area: Net density by land use designation; Number and type of units; iii. Total development application unit count; iv. Estimated population; b. For the entire Secondary Plan Area: V. Overall density per hectare and by land use designation; vi. Number of dwelling units by type; vii. Number of units within the built-up area; viii. Amount/type of non-residential space and number of jobs; 50 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page139 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT C. How the application is implementing the housing policies in Section 8 of the Secondary Plan; and d. Number of purpose-built accessory apartments. 14.2.4. The Municipality shall make available the most up-to-date data based on proposed and approved development in the Secondary Plan area referenced in Section 14.2.3. 14.2.5. To help ensure a diversity of housing is provided and that housing and population targets are achieved, all development applications shall provide a land budget to demonstrate how the application will support the achievement of the applicable housing targets. If the approved application differs from the original application, a revised land budget shall be provided. 14.2.6. The Municipality shall make available data on the housing mix, based on existing and approved development, to assist applicants in the preparation of land budgets for new applications. 15.0 INTERPRETATION 15.1. It is intended that this Secondary Plan Area be developed in accordance with the policies of this Secondary Plan in conjunction with the applicable policies of the Official Plan. Notwithstanding that intention, where there is a conflict between the principles, objectives, and/or policies of this Secondary Plan and the Official Plan, the principles, objectives, and/or policies of this Secondary Plan shall prevail. 15.2. Inherent to this Secondary Plan is the principle of flexibility. Policies shall be subject to interpretation without Amendment to this Secondary Plan, provided that the general intent and structure of the Secondary Plan are maintained to the satisfaction of the Municipality. As such, it is the intent of the Municipality to permit some flexibility in the interpretation of the policies, regulations, and numerical requirements of this Secondary Plan except where this Secondary Plan is explicitly intended to be prescriptive. 15.3. The boundaries between land use designations are to be considered approximate except where they coincide with existing roads, rail lines, utilities, or other clearly defined physical features. Where the general intent of this 51 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page140 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan - DRAFT Secondary Plan is maintained, to the satisfaction of the Municipality, minor boundary adjustments will not require an Amendment to this Secondary Plan. 15.4. Development within the Secondary Plan Area will be guided by a detailed series of policies, regulations, and guidelines that will create a livable and diverse community that is sympathetic to the environmental context. The Sustainable Development Guidelines (Appendix A) provide the foundation for the development of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan Area and the basis for the policy framework of this Secondary Plan. 52 1 DRAFT October 2021 Page 141 F ■ 774 E=M © I ■ :: 7 *am ............. 1 i Hydro Corridor i -................. �.►�• i ED V71n tF�l NP I. E Highway p4 1 40 V 416 ,-. \ P \ ❑ Fj ❑ ❑ 0 CD �Qcil Q�Q�Qa� e� 0 LEGEND Secondary Plan Boundary 0 Buffer/Open Sapce 0 Medium Density Residential 0 Environmental Protection 0 High Density Residential swnn Stormwater Management Facilities Neighbourhood Centre JJJL�] Green Space Neighbourhood Park MTO Lands Parkette/Community Gardens Water Course O C::�ODo ID n[7DDDL1 Hydro Corridor Q VlMnET� -, - 'D CIDDnLa ]�Q�]F-iu Existing Wilmot �� ��O 00 ❑ Creek Community F ❑ Eli LfLfi L�J D ❑d V "Y Lj ,� ❑ DO ���� Ofl O Q�QQ ❑ o� �Q OE�%a OO O� O� ��o���❑ ono��oCD o a Q Qa ❑ q p OQD�Qor� �b� O� �JD QogO D QQ��� 0 �❑��f Arterial Type C Collector Road ST4 Idwro Private Road - Controlled Access Trail Page142 Schedule A LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan 0 a O Attachment 6 to Report PDS-052-21 October 4, 2021 WI LMOT CREEK NEIGHBOURHOOD SUSTINABILITY GUIDELINES AN NOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Why plan for sustainability?........................................................................................... 2 1.2 What is sustainable development?................................................................................2 1.3 Vision for sustainable Clarington.................................................................................. 2 1.4 Purpose of this document...............................................................................................2 2 Policy Context.............................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan........................................................... 2 2.2 Priority Green.................................................................................................................... 2 3 One Planet Living(OPQ............................................................................................. 3 3.1 What is OPL?.....................................................................................................................3 3.2 How it will be used............................................................................................................ 3 4 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Sustainability Principles ....................................... 3 5 Implementation............................................................................................................ 5 Page143 Introduction 1.1 Why plan for sustainability? There is mounting evidence that suggests that Canadian lifestyles require four planet's worth of resources. Our patterns of behaviour are unsustainable, particularly in the context of a changing climate. In order to reverse course, cities are increasingly relied upon to develop and implement sustainability strategies that consider its streets, buildings, open spaces, and people. When all elements of a community are designed sustainably, the gains become exponential, outweighing the sum of its parts. 1.2 What is sustainable development? Sustainable development incorporates decision -making and action that ensures a healthy environment, vibrant communities, and economic vitality for current and future generations. Sustainable development ensures that a community's current resource needs are satisfied without impacting the availability of resources for future generations. As per the Clarington Official Plan (OP), this translates into sustainable urban and architectural design that creates a comfortable environment for residents and establishes a positive image for the community. Moreover, the OP recognizes that sustainable design contributes to community and environmental health, a high quality of life, and climate change mitigation and preparedness. 1.3 Vision for sustainable Clarington The Municipality of Clarington has committed to pursuing a sustainable future, as outlined in the OP and the Priority Green Clarington Development Framework (Priority Green). These documents, which together establish the principles of sustainability, are used by the Municipality in the development of other plans and master plans to achieve a healthy natural environment, vibrant communities, and a strong economy 1.4 Purpose of this document The purpose of the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Sustainability Guidelines (Sustainability Guidelines) is to expand on Priority Green and define sustainability priorities specific to the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Development. 2 Policy Context 2.1 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan 2.2 Priority Green These sections will provide background information on the Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Secondary Plan (Secondary Plan) and Priority Green as it relates to sustainability principles. This document will build from this work, providing direction to ensure Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood is designed and constructed in a sustainable manner. Page 144 2 3 One Planet Living (OPL) 3.1 What is OPL? One Planet Living (OPL) is a sustainability framework that provides developers and community builders with a framework with which to reduce the negative environmental and social impacts associated with the way we design, build, and interact with our communities. It aims to create a future where it is attractive and affordable for people to lead happy and healthy lives using a fair share of the Earth's resources. OPL's 10 guiding principles provide a framework that embodies all elements of a project. They give us a shared lens and language from which we can map together the different aspects of sustainability each partner brings to a project, demonstrating the collective impact a development team can have on its local community. It brings social, economic and environmental sustainability together. OPL's 10 Principles: QL Health Equity and Culture and Land and nature Sustainable and happiness local economy community water (16 Q16 QL & & Local and Materials Travel Zero carbon sustainable food and products Zero waste P and transport energy 3.2 How it will be used While OPL can be used as a third -party certification, it is also commonly employed as an organizing framework for sustainability. OPL addresses all domains of sustainability, including environmental, social and economic. Therefore, it encourages a holistic and integrated approach to sustainability that ensures developments have a meaningful impact on their communities. Furthermore, unlike other frameworks, One Planet Living is a flexible tool without preassigned credits or prerequisites. This affords a great deal of flexibility, whereby sustainability can be addressed in a context -specific manner. The Sustainability Guidelines will utilize the OPL framework as an outline to structure its sustainability principles and strategies. 4 Wilmot Creek Neighbourhood Sustainability Principles This section will outline the specific sustainability priorities which will be addressed by the Sustainability Guidelines. Organized by One Planet Living Principle, each priority will further the objectives outlined in the Secondary Plan and Priority Green. Additional topics may be identified at a later date to ensure a holistic approach to sustainability. Page145 3 Health and Happiness • Outdoor Air Quality • Access to Parks and Open Spaces • Access to Daily Needs • Access to Civic Spaces Equity and Local Economy Local and Sustainable Food • Local food production Materials and Products • Recycled/Reclaimed Materials • Sustainable Materials • Affordable Housing Zero Waste • Universal and Accessible Design • Waste Collection and Storage • Housing Types and Size • Nonhazardous Construction • Accessibility within the Public Realm • Construction Waste Management Culture and Community • Public Art • Outdoor Amenity Space • Cultural Heritage Resources Land Use and Nature • Light Pollution • Ecological Functions • Tree Canopy • Ecological Integrity • Heat Island Effect Sustainable Water • Water Quality • Stormwater Runoff in Parking Areas • Irrigation • Rainwater Management • Native, Drought -Tolerant Plants • Building Water Efficiency • Water Metering Travel and Transport • Accessible Pedestrian Infrastructure • Walkability • Sidewalk Provision • Bike Storage • Bike Network • Compact Development • Access to Transit • Electric Vehicle Charging Station • Surface Parking Zero Carbon • Solar Readiness • Building Resilience • Renewable Energy For each sustainability priority, the Sustainability Guidelines will outline both 'Mandatory' and `Voluntary' performance measures. Table 1 provides an example of mandatory and voluntary performance measures for `Rainwater Management' and "Native, Drought -Tolerant Plants'. Page146 4 URBAN EQUATION Table 1. Mandato and voluntarZ performance measures example Sustainable Performance Measures Sustainability Priority Mandatory Voluntary Rainwater Management In a manner best Achieve 85t" percentile replicating natural site hydrology processes, retain (i.e., infiltrate, evapotranspi rate, or collect and reuse) on -site the runoff from the developed site for, at minimum, the 80tn percentile of regional or local rainfall events using low -impact development (LID) and green infrastructure (GI) practices. Native, Drought -Tolerant Native, drought -tolerant 100% of the landscaped Plants plants used for 50% of the area landscaped area. 5 Implementation This section will provide a checklist to help the development community track the sustainability strategies that are being pursued. Page147 Clarbgton Notice of Public Meeting A land use change has been proposed, have your say! The Municipality is seeking public comments before making a decision on an application for a proposed Plan of Subdivision and an application for a Zoning By-law Amendment. Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista Homes Corporation and Panterra Inc. have submitted applications for Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to permit a plan of subdivision with a total of 131 residential units consisting of 57 single detached dwelling units, 48 semi-detached dwelling units and 26 townhouse dwelling units. The subdivision includes a number of new local roads and a open space block. The applications are deemed complete. 684, 688, 694 and 704 North Street in Newcastle. 0 0 0 Additional Lands Owned by Applicant Y u j 47 46 145 44`�43 42 41 40 .39 3B 37 20 ®&simile= C,®. Open Space 61 Single Detached Dwellings Semi-detached Dwellings Street Townhouses Roadways ©®M®®11 �ki5 l6 UKi'f5 10 4 Y�I -14 5 6 4 3 2 1 714 1 67 68 69 0 For additional information on the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment, and the background studies are available for review on our website at clarington.net/developmentproposais Questions? Please contact Brandon Weiler 905-623-3379, extension 2424, or by email at bweiler(a-)clarington.net Our procedures have changed as we continue to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic. As mandated by Public Health, to maintain physical distancing these meetings will take place electronically. This meeting is live -streamed for public viewing at www.clarington.net/calendar Date: Monday, October 25, 2021 Time: 9:30 am Place: Electronic Teams meeting by way of on-line device or telephone If you wish to speak at the public meeting, please pre -register and you will be provided with further instructions. Page148 You can pre -register by completing the online form at www.clarington.net/delegations or contact the Clerk's Department at 905-623-3379 ext. 2109 or clerks(a)_clarington.net by Friday, October 22nd, 2021 at 3:30 p.m. If you are unable to participate electronically, please contact the Clerk's Department and we will do our utmost to accommodate you. We encourage you to submit your written comments for Committee's consideration to Brandon Weiler at bweiler(a).clarington.net or by mail or drop box to 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 prior to the date of the public meeting File Numbers: S-C-2021-0004 & ZBA2021-0014 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act The personal information you submit will become part of the public record and may be released to the public. Questions about the information we collect can be directed to the Clerk's Department at 905- 623-3379, extension 2102. Accessibility If you have accessibility needs and require alternate formats of this document or other accommodations please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Appeal Requirements If you do not speak at the public meeting or send your comments or concerns to the Municipality of Clarington before the by-law is passed: a) you will not be entitled to appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal; and b) you will not be able to participate at a hearing of an appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal, in the opinion of the Tribunal, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Ryan Windle, MCIP, RPP, AICP Director of Planning and Development Services claringtonnet. share point. cc cations/S-C 5a) - Public Meeting Notice - COVID.docx Page149 Application By: Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista Homes Corporation and Panterra Inc. Applications by Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista Homes Corporation and Panterra Inc. for Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to permit a total of 131 residential units consisting of 57 single detached dwelling units, 48 semi-detached dwelling units and 26 townhouse dwelling units. Public Meeting: October 25, 2021 4 yj 10 FF, . 4XX ge Additional Lands Owned by Applicant r OR Open Space 0 Single Detached Dwellings 0 Semi-detached Dwellings 0 Street Townhouses Roadways 96 45 94 43 42 91 90 39 38 37 36 21 47 20 t 9 19 1,14VIESM 18 ❑ 48 30 31 32 33 39 35 17 T 49 16 y . 29 4 SO 15 28 25 24 23 22 51 27 14 52 26 13 O v `53 12 54 11 5556 10 57 r ( 9 I�J5 Ijy' � 5 4 3 2 1 r ! I ■ 63 fig 65 66 67 77 78 79 80 81 , �.i 6B 76 a 70 75 �. 70 79 73 72 71 3 MW 7 .: J." . j aj y j!k 0 m Additional Study Area Qj 100 Whitehand Drive 0 Gradly,Driyd, z ErskiiDrive Page IL :L ly Y-L! Cone d Cone ssion k- LL nC/ Georg 1% J a t _ ly NY x } Cf 1 `, I DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Applicant Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista Homes Corporation and Panterra Inc. Site Location 684, 688, 694 and 704 North Street in Newcastle i& Proposal: A plan of subdivision with a total of 131 residential units consisting of 57 single detached dwelling units, 48 semi-detached dwelling units and 26 townhouse dwelling units. The subdivision includes a number of new local roads and open space blocks. Files: Zoning Bylaw Amendment ZBA2021-0014 & Subdivision S-C-2021- 0004 to 26 Townhouse Dwelling Units 48 Semi-detached Dwelling Units 1" 57 Single Detached units 40• livil NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Our procedures have changed as wAntinue to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic. As mandated by Public Health, t maintain physical distancing this meeting will take place in an electronic format using an online device or telephone. Date: Monday, October 25, 2021 Time: 9:30 am Place: Electronic Teams Meeting If you wish to speak at the public meeting, please pre - register and you will be provided with further instructions- You can pre -register by completing the online form at www,clarington.netldelegations or contact the Clerk's Department at 905-623-3379 exi. 2109 or clerks{u)clarin=i ton.net by Friday, October. 22 2021 at 3:30 p.m or submit your written comments to the Planner by email or to 40 Temperance Street. Bowmanviile, ON, L 1 C 3A6 0 FIND OUT MORE Contact the Planner Brandon Weiler Planning Services Department err 905-623-3379 ext. 2424 ® bweiler@clarinpton.net (� www.clarington.net claingtoin NORTH VILLAGE SECONDARY PLAN AREA TIMi ;I hh ,� I Subject Lands Ig ; o f PRCPCSEU SWM POND I �� Draft Approved i SWM Pond t i CRlyq �i il Tp� oil � I `AMFACf 1f C"? vvq___ii� 0 Existing Easement Page 158 j Block Plan Study Area Aw X . L _ 1 ♦ i R—wir Subject Property i i � ... fJy - .rrt. ' 4d' • 17 -7 1 f. • ys !rc w i age7"' STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING 684, 688, 694 and 704 North Street, Newcastle Paul A. King & MDTR Group on behalf of Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista Homes Corp. and Panterra Inc. File Numbers: S-C-2021-0004 and ZBA2021-0014 Page158 ca wil r lw dW a 7 �Y F • � ti M D T R INC., GOL THE PROPOSED DEV°1 noAACKir 57 single -detached homes 48 semi-detached homes 26 Townhouses New local roads Open space blocks Page 160 BEACH ROAD VILLAS INC., GOLF VISTA HOMES CORP., & PANTERRA INC. EXISTING ZONING The subject lands are zoned Agricultural Exception (Al) Zone, Agricultural Exception (A-60) Zone with a Holding (H) prefix and Environmental Protection (EP) Zone in Zoning By-law 84-63 Q Residential C,om mgrcial I nsbn6onal Mixed Use ARTERIAL P[0,4D TYPE W El BEACH ROAD VILLAS INC., GOLF VISTA HOMES CORP., & PANTERRA INC Pa ,lk17 By -low 84_6 PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 The proposed development promotes a compact and cost-effective and a land use pattern that efficiently uses lands and servicing The Subject property is located within the urban boundary of Newcastle Village The PPS supports residential development with CRAMS a mix of housing types to meet current and future housing needs Page162 BEACH ROAD VILLAS INC., GOLF VISTA HOMES CORP., & PANTERRA INC PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 Growth directed to settlement areas with: • Delineated built boundary • Full Municipal Servicing • Achievement of complete communities Complete communities support a mix of dwelling options allowing a range of household sizes and incomes to find appropriate housing choices The Growth Plan promotes the optimization of land uses on an underutilized site within an established community Page163 BEACH ROAD VILLAS INC., GOLF VISTA HOMES CORP., & PANTERRA INC A Place to Grow Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe Olfice ConmBtletion 202 �p��`�55�r1 On[a,iota/g rowmplanning .41 OCaaO� a ooa o 00a 0 UL111111 UNIT ri Un UUKHAM REGION OFFICIAL PLAN., ZUZU Growth: Durham Region is expected to grow by 312,000+ residents by the year 2031 Subject Property: Living Areas The subject property is identified as located within Living Areas - Intended to support a mix of housing options (sizes, types, tenure) Housing Mix The proposed development conforms to the Region of Durham Official Plan by proposing an appropriate density and providing a range of dwelling types satisfying the needs of current and future residents u�ranrr sx�� �.�. URBAN AREA BOUIIDARY UFSUJAREAgO~RY DEFERRED, URBAN GROMVTH CENTRE REGIONALCEN7RE NVNG AREAS REGIONAL CORRIDOR &REFAF aun_s ieYS—F ■MJf)u []PFH —RIDGE$ SPACE AREAS MORAINE AREAS _ WATERFRCIN7 ALAS CAK RIDGES MORAINE GREEHMI-T fi NCARY BOUNDARY AL RFCRF.ATIONA► NME A T�011Rlarn�ce e.TMinFa Subject Land WN ERFRONT PLACE _ _ _ rrn �n. Kor,•�ir,Kn 2 35 115 I I I I co LOT] LOTI 28 f 27 I CON H I LOT 26 7 Page 164 BEACH ROAD VILLAS INC., GOLF VISTA HOMES CORP., & PANTERRA INC MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN 2018 The subject lands are located within the Built-up Area of Map B Clarington's Urban Structure The proposed development considers the lands located along the westerly portion of the subject lands, designated "Environmental Protection Area to be protected by a 15-metre buffer The development proposal conforms to the Built Form (Section 5.4) requirements for new neighbourhoods by being consistent with the overall character of the neighbouring new development proposals, providing for a variety of housing types and by incorporating sound attenuation into the subdivision design to mitigate the noise impacts of Hwy 35/1 15 adjacent to the west boundary of the property URW �1[X VILLAGE CENTRE LK rr fJ0U TRY1AREA UTUT7 ENV IROP"NiAI AROTECTIO!! AREA _ GREM WAIE WATERFRONT GREENWAY MLIWlyYPARK - W MiCFAI WOE PARK WATERFRONT PLACE TOVROU NODE dy Subject Lands Page165 BEACH ROAD VILLAS INC., GOLF VISTA HOMES CORP., & PANTERRA INC SUPPORTING STUDIES & PLANS The applicant has completed a number of studies to support the proposed applications for a zoning by-law amendment and the draft plan of subdivision including; • Environmental Impact Study - GHD - February 2021 Landscape Analysis Plan and Tree Inventory and Preservation • Noise Study - YCA Engineering - June 2021 Plan -New Leaf Ltd. -June 2021 • • Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Arborist Report -New Leaf Ltd. -June 2021 Report - Candevcon East Ltd. - June 2021 Sustainability Report - Paul A. King, Planning & Development • Grading/Drainage Plan - Candevcon East Ltd. - June 2021 Consultant -July 2021 • • Erosion and Sediment Control Plan -Candevcon East Limited - Planning Justification Report - Paul A. King, Planning &Development Consultant -July 2021 June 2021 • Draft Plan of Subdivision - Paul A. King, Planning & Development • Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment -Irvin Heritage Inc. - Consultant -July 2021 June 2021 • Transportation Impact Study - Nextrans Consulting Engineers - • Block Master Plan - Paul A. King, Planning & DevelopmentConsultant -July 2021 June 2021 • Reference Plan/Survey - H. F. Grander Co. Ltd. - April 2021 • Parking Plan -Paul A. King, Planning &Development Consultant - July 2021 4 • Site Screening Questionnaire - MDTR Group - July 2021 / Page 166 BEACH ROAD VILLAS INC., GOLF VISTA HOMES CORP., & PANTERRA INC =1 AMF :1=r I= MF]Mr] ILI! lip iiim Am j BMW .07 DETAILED DRAFT PLAN 10 � iAW F 4 11ols dw .0 --.OWM Page 168r. 4 JEW Clarington Public Meeting Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Joint Committees Date of Meeting: October 25, 2021 Report Number: PDS-053-21 Submitted By: Ryan Windle, Director of Planning and Development Services File Number: S-C-2021-0004 and ZBA2021-0014 Resolution#: Report Subject: Applications by Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista Homes Corporation and Panterra Inc. for a Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit 131 residential units in Newcastle Purpose of Report: The purpose of this report is to provide information to the public and Council. It does not constitute, imply or request any degree of approval. Recommendations: 1. That Report PDS-053-21 be received for information only; 2. That Staff receive and consider comments from the public and Council with respect to the Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law applications; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-053-21 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page169 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-053-21 Report Overview Page 2 The Municipality is seeking the public's input on applications for a proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment, submitted by Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista Homes Corporation and Panterra Inc. to permit 131 residential units consisting of 57 single detached dwellings, 48 semi-detached dwellings and 26 townhouse dwellings. The subdivision would include new local roads and be accessed from North Street, Newcastle. 1. Application Details 1.1 Owner/Applicant 1.2 Proposal: 1.3 Area: 1.4 Location: 1.5 Roll Number 1.6 Within Built Boundary: 2. Background Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista Homes Corporation Incoporated Draft Plan of Subdivision The proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision would permit 131 residential units consisting of 57 single detached dwellings, 48 semi-detached dwellings and 26 townhouse dwellings. The subdivision would be accessed from a new local road from North Street. Zoning By-law Amendment To rezone the lands from "Agricultural Exception (A-1)", "Agricultural Exception (A-60)", and "Environmental Protection (EP)" to appropriate zones that would permit single detached, semi-detached and townhouse dwelling units with the proposed lot sizes and provisions. 11.17 hectares (27.6 acres) North Street, Newcastle Village 181703013011300 Yes 2.1 On July 12, 2021, the Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista Homes Corporation and Panterra Inc. submitted applications for proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment for lands at 668A, 668B, 694 and 704 North Street as seen on Figure 1. Page170 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-053-21 '- • �__ *- R. - Liiwl V ff l $: r� 1. Subject Property Page 3 Figure 1: Lands subject to Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning Applications. Page 171 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PDS-053-21 2.2 The proposal is for a total of 131 residential units comprising 57 single detached dwellings on a minimum 11.6 m frontages; 48 semi-detached units on 15.0 m frontages, each unit would have a 7.5 m minimum frontage; and 26 street townhouse units with a minimum 6.0 m frontage. The plan of subdivision proposes a single access point to the development connecting to North Street. The proposal also includes 5.31 hectares of Open Space or Environmentally Protected Area. t- -,21 x f `' 46 45 44 4320 42 41 4p 39 38 37 36 48 l y 17 A 30 - 31 32 33 34 35 49 6 29 50 is 28 25 29 23 7 SI 19 27 52 6 13 3 l2 ..,.'jd 54 ll 5556 SSo Unils IO j: s] 9 � e 8 p 7 LO I9QI r �n Open Space 61 41 4�UI 5 9 3 2 11 62 63 C Additional Lands 6 65 66 67 r Owned by Applicant 7 7s 79 BP ei 76 75 -Y F � I: 70 71 Jim �d Single Detached Dwellings 0 Semi-detached Dwellings 0 Street Townhouses .. - f 0 Roadways g 9 Figure 2: Proposed Plan of Subdivision. 2.3 A portion of the subject lands are traversed by the Foster Creek and its associated valley system which makes up part of Natural Heritage System. These lands have been included in the proposed Open Space block. The lands west of the Foster Creek and its associated valley are beyond the Newcastle Village Urban Area boundary and are identified as Additional Lands Owned by Applicant on Figure 2. The development has limited frontage on North Street and is directly behind ten existing residential properties Page172 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-053-21 Page 5 fronting on North Street and Regional Road 17, as the road name changes in this general vicinity. 2.4 The lands are within the North Newcastle Neighbourhood. In 2012, a Neighbourhood Design Plan was approved, based on the previous policies of the Clarington Official Plan for the southern two thirds of the neighbourhood between North Street and Arthur Street. This area is depicted in blue on Figure 3 below. Figure 3: North Newcastle Village Secondary Plan Area Page173 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report PDS-053-21 2.5 Based on a request from a Landowners Group, Council authorized staff to commence a Secondary Plan process for the remainder of the lands south of Concession Road 3. In 2019, a Public Meeting was held for a Secondary Plan area as shown in red on the same figure. The subject lands are part of the additional study area shown in yellow, that are being considered as part of the Secondary Plan process. A key component of the North Newcastle Secondary Plan is the alignment for the intersection of North Street /Regional Road 17 with Concession Road 3. The Environmental Assessment is currently underway as part of the Secondary Planning process. 2.6 The applicant has submitted following reports and studies in support of the applications: • Planning Justification Report • Functional Servicing Report • Storm Water Management Report • Noise Study • Site Screening Questionnaire • Environmental Impact Study • Energy Conservation and Sustainability Plan • Archaeological Assessment 2.7 These have been circulated to the appropriate review agencies and/or departments and will be discussed in a subsequent report. 3. Land Characteristics and Surrounding Uses 3.1 Foster Creek and associated valley bisects the subject lands. The lands to the west of the Foster Creek generally drain easterly towards the creek, while the lands east of the creek slope westerly, draining away from North Street and towards the creek. The area proposed for residential development currently includes three existing residences and the balance is being used for agricultural crops. The lands have limited frontage on North Street. 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North - Docville and existing residential dwellings on private services South - Existing residential dwellings on private services, CP Rail line and the Foster Creek Neighbourhood East - North Street and two Draft Approved Plans of Subdivision by Brookfield Homes and DG Group West - Highway 35/115, agricultural land and rural residential on Bellwood Drive Page174 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-053-21 4. Provincial Policy Provincial Policy Statement Page 7 4.1 The Provincial Policy Statement identifies settlement areas as the focus of growth. Land use patterns shall be based on densities and a mix of land uses that efficiently use land, resources and infrastructure. 4.2 Opportunities for redevelopment and intensification are to be promoted where it can be accommodated. Municipalities must provide a variety of housing types and densities, efficiently utilizing existing infrastructure and public transit facilities. Provincial Growth Plan 4.3 The proposed development is within the defined Built Boundary and within the Newcastle Village Urban Boundary. 4.4 Growth is to be accommodated in the built up areas through intensification and efficient use of existing services and infrastructure. A minimum of 40 percent of all residential development occurring annually within each upper tier municipality will be within the built up area. 4.5 The development of complete communities is encouraged by promoting a diverse mix of land uses, a mix of employment and housing types, high quality public open space and easy access to local stores and services. 5. Official Plans Durham Regional Official Plan 5.1 The Durham Region Official Plan designates the subject lands Living Areas. Living Areas permit the development of communities incorporating the widest possible variety of housing types, sizes and tenure to provide living accommodations that address various socio-economic factors. 5.2 Living Areas shall be developed in a compact form through higher densities and by intensifying and redeveloping existing areas. 5.3 The Region of Durham Official Plan identifies Key Natural Heritage and Hydrologic Features to the west of the subject lands. Development or site alteration is not permitted in Key Natural Heritage and Hydrologic Features, including any associated vegetation protection zone, as determined through an Environmental Impact Study. Page175 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-053-21 Clarington Official Plan Page 8 5.4 The Clarington Official Plan designates the subject property between North Street and the west side of the Foster Creek as "Urban Residential" and "Environmental Protection Area". The lands west of the Foster Creek valley are outside of the Newcastle Urban Area and designated "Prime Agricultural Area". 5.5 The "Environmental Protection Area" designation recognizes the most significant components of the Municipality's natural environment. As such, these areas and their ecological functions are to be preserved and protected from the effects of human activity. Development proposals adjacent to natural heritage features require an Environmental Impact Study to be submitted to detail the limits of the feature and its buffer. 5.6 The primary land use in the "Urban Residential" designation is for housing with a minimum density of 16 units per net hactare and a maximum of three storeys. 5.7 North Street and Regional Road 17 in front of this property are designated a Type B Arterial Road, with specific policies regarding right-of-way widths, and intersection spacing. 5.8 The Clarington Trails Schedule (Map K) identifies a potential Regional Trail following the Foster Creek valley from the CP rail line in the south northerly to Highway 407. 6. Zoning By-law 6.1 Zoning By-law 84-63 zones the subject lands "Agricultural Exception (A-1)", Agricultural Exception (A-60)" as well as "Environmental Protection (EP)." The proposed development is not permitted based on the existing zoning and the EP zone does not reflect the extent of the natural heritage features as identified in the Provincial, Regional, or Clarington policies. A rezoning is required to permit the proposed uses. 7. Public Notice and Submissions 7.1 Public notice was mailed to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject lands on September 24, 2021 and a Public Meeting Sign installed fronting onto North Street on September 29, 2021. Page176 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-053-21 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Applicant Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista Homes Corporation and Panterra Inc. Site Location 684, 688, 694 and 704 North Street in Newcastle 0 Proposal: A plan of subdivision with a total of 131 residential units consisting of 57 single detached dwelling units, 48 semi-detached dwelling units and 26 townhouse dwelling units. The subdivision includes a number of new focal roads and open space blocks, Files! Zoning Bylaw Amendment ZOA2021-0014 & Subdivision S-C-2021- 0004 fr 26 Townhouse Dwelling Units 48 Semi-detached Dwelling Units 57 Single Detached units lifti, NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Ou• praedures Fave changed as we�ntinue }o atlapt to thenitin09pa I di i�,As man dated by Public HeallM1,q In pdyslcxl distancing t meetingwillrake place In a naelectronlctnrmak using an eIll ne device or relepM1one. If you x6.sh m speak a1 the public meetng, ➢lease pae- mgisterand ypu vAlf lIe pmvlded with iud " instmctb— Yw Wn pr�r¢ai5tta by mmplet"i, the na form at rryyw.pla_ngptoo naHtleleoa1W - e1 conmct the Clerk's Oeparlmenl et sm 6233379 ek[ 2109 or ee rks@cla� by Fri October. 22 2021 at 3. 30 p. m 111.1—your writtenw inen. to th. watt... by her 1p 4o rempi..n. street. BowmenNlte, ON, L1C 3AG py FIND OUT MORE Contact the Planner Brandon Weiler Planning Services Department 4 905-623-3379 ext.2424 II! bweiler@clarington.net (� www.clarington-net Page 9 Figure 4: Public meeting sign posted on subject lands fronting onto North Street. 7.2 Staff received comments from the landowner to the south who owns 686 North Street regarding an existing access easement over a portion of 684 North Street. The proposed draft plan does not maintain that easement or allow for access to the property. This is discussed further in Section 11 of this report. 7.3 No other comments were received at the time of the finalization of this staff report. 8. Agency Comments Regional Municipality of Durham 8.1 Comments from Durham Region Planning and Works Departments have not been received at the time of finalizing this report but will be included in a subsequent report. 8.2 Durham Region Transit indicated they had no comments regarding the applications. Page177 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-053-21 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Page 10 8.3 Comments from the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority have not been received at the time of finalizing this report but will be included in a subsequent report. Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board 8.4 Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board have no objections to the applications but have indicated that students being generated from this subdivision may be required to attend a holding school as Newcastle Public School is currently experiencing accommodation preasures. Ministry of Transportation 8.5 Comments from the Ministry of Transporation have not been received at the time of finalizing this report but will be included in a subsequent report. � 11 17-M 8.6 Enbridge, the French School Board, and Canada Post have no concerns with the applications. 9. Departmental Comments Public Works Department 9.1 The Public Works Department has no objections, in principle, to the applications. 9.2 Public Works has identified a number of concerns that the applicant must address including road widths and turning circles where roads end, on -street parking requirements, grading issues and stormwater management issues including directing water to a stormwater pond that will be external to the site. Emergency and Fire Services 9.3 Emergency and Fire Services recommend a second access to the development from North Street/Regional Road 17. 10. Discussion 10.1 The North Newcastle Secondary Plan process is currently underway for the lands to the lands east and north of the subject lands. The development of the subject lands are not dependant on the study being completed, but the subject plan must allow for integration options and flexibility with the future development on the east side of North Street. Staff Page178 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-053-21 Page 11 required the applicant to submit a block plan showing how the plan and remnant blocks of the Secondary Plan boundary can integrate with the surrounding lands in the future (See Figure 5). The Block Plan in blue, shows how the surrounding lands could redevelop over time and compliment the draft approved subdivisions on the east side of North Street. N � 1 r i' NORTH VILLAGE SECONDARY PLAN AREA I i i �� I� 11111\� �11111®1111= 11111 111'11 ;_ =n IIIIIIIIIIIIIgIII= �_ =_ 111111111� _��=11111111111111� __ �. �IIIIIIIIIIIII� 1111N1 INI1� � 11NNNH =■I� =:1-� 111111111111111■11111111� '�, � �:�k = 11111111111111 111111111� = �� ; ■�■r :=IIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111./ NJNHWI �IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII ' - PitOPO:ED SW POND Draft Approved . i SWM Pond AN � pAc/FrC-LWAI y _ _1 Block Plan Study Area _ _- Figure 5: Block Master Plan submitted by the Applicant. Page 179 Municipality of Clarington Page 12 Report PDS-053-21 10.2 The applicant has proposed a future stormwater pond on lands to the south abutting the CP Rail corridor. These lands are external to the draft plan and not owned by the applicant. During detailed design for the draft approved subdivision on the east side of North Street it became apparent that the proposed stormwater pond location may not be feasible due to existing soil conditions. As such the Owner/Applicant is suggesting that the stormwater pond on the west side could serve the proposed draft plan on the subject lands and the previously draft approved plan on the east side. The background work for the stormwater pond alternative, including pond design for the west side of North Street, are still in the early stages of discussion and review with the applicants and the land owners on the east side of North Street. The proposed development will need to consider the final stormwater pond solution once determined. 10.3 The applications propose to develop an area between North Street and the Foster Creek valley. As part of the proposal, studies and reports were submitted to support re -aligning the regulatory flood -line through a proposed cut and fill program while maintaining and protecting the natural heritage features. The applicants have submitted an Environmental Impact Study and Functional Servicing Report that staff and conservation authority staff are currently reviewing. The results of these studies will determine what changes to the existing grade and impacts to the flood plain could occur which may impact the lot and street design on the west side. 10.4 686 North Street has an access easement over a portion of the subject lands at 684 North Street. The access easement is along the south property limits of 684 North Street, where the existing driveway is located to provide access to North Street. The applicant recognized the existing easement in their application but the proposed plan does not indicate the existing easement or provide for an alternative access to the lands. The applicant will be required to revise the plan to either maintain the existing access easement to 686 North Street or propose an alternative solution. 10.5 The proposed subdivision has a single access to North Street. This is not ideal, and generally not supported from a site circulation, maintenance and safety prespective. In instances where multiple accesses are not possible the number of units may be limited. The applicant will be required to work with staff and the Region to explore alternative access points. 10.6 The purpose of the Public Meeting is to provide an opportunity for further public input. These public comments will be compiled, discussed with the applicant and addressed in a subsequent staff recommendation report. 11. Concurrence Not Applicable. Page180 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-053-21 12. Conclusion Page 13 12.1 The purpose of this report is to provide background information on the Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment applications submitted by Beach Road Villas Inc., Golf Vista Homes Corporation and Panterra Inc. for the Public Meeting under the Planning Act. Staff will continue processing the applications including the preparation of a subsequent report upon receipt of all agency and department comments and the resolution of identified issues. Staff Contact: Brandon Weiler, Planner, (905) 623-3379 ext. 2424 or bweiler@clarington.net. Attachments: Not Applicable List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 181 Community Relations Committee 2021 Meeting each quarter to discuss activities of environmental concern in the community Topics include: • Public safety along waterfront and use of private and public spaces • Natural environment protection and management in the area • Clarington activities and news that could impact the community • St Marys operation improvements and information exchanges • Exchanges of information that occur throughout the year on activities in the area • Science and Engineering specialists engaged to inform the committee on environmental matters Community Relations Committee 2021 Blast Liaison Committee • Formed with community members to share information on St Marys Blasting activities • Community members complete a blast experience survey for each blast • The blast data and survey data are compiled to assist in evaluating and acting on sources of conce • Blasting experts brought in to evaluate and assist in mitigating blasts during installation • Community outreach with the regular presence of St Marys personnel in community for blasts j e etine w y North Quarry/ Site F/ SMC . • AU -` .. Cove Road/SMC2" _ N' V _ lk }r F SMC 1 _ _• y{ P'Cedar Crest (Vacant Lot) ' New Seismograph w SMC Main MET • 4 i /Site D 11 elk * 4'. + . - • Cedar Crest/ Sit `• J 6 F Aggregate , jwwSMt,. Dock MET • t ME 2020 St Marys Blast Summary No Exceedences of ground vibration levels 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Peak Ground Vibration Level (mm/s) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N fV N N N N N N N N N N fV N lV N N lV N N fV N N N N lV N N fV N N N fV lV N N N N N fV N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N. N N N N N N N. N N N N N N N r4 N N fV N N N N N N N. O � Ln N I�, M N D � 00 C, O O M M M Ln W N M Ln I� ' O Ln O r� O N ' 00 O �O 00 O, Ln N ON 00 N N N N-- — N N-- — M N N N-- —— N -- 7 N CV N N N N N M � 'V "T Ln Ln Ln �O 10 00 00 00 O, O, O, 0 0 0 N N N N Golder Peak Component (mm/s) Cedar Crest Golder Peak Component (mm/s) Baseline -I-Ground Vibration Limit (Golder Peak Component (mm/s) Aggregate Shop —Golder Peak Component (mm/s) Cedar Crest Vacant Page 186 145 140 135 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 2020 St Marys Blast Summary Exceedence was an anomaly- Device replaced in January 2021 Peak Air Vibration Level (dB) O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0------ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N cV N cV N N LV N N LV N fV N N N N N N O Ln N I" M N '0 � 00 a` 'O O M � M Ln 00 I,, M Ln I� � Ln O I, O I" I 00 O �O 00 � a, Ln N O, M N N N N N N E M N N N N N N N N Ln �D I� 00 O� O O N N — — — � 7 — N r4 N N N M Ln Ln Ln 'O 10 I� N N 00 00 00 a` 01 ON — — O O O — — — — — N N N LV Golder Air Vibration (dBL) Cedar Crest (Golder Air Vibration (dBL) Aggregate Shop Golder Air Vibration (dBL) Baseline — Golder Air Vibration (dBL) Cedar Crest Vacant -I-Air Vibration Limit Page 187 St Marys PM10 Continuous Monitoring Program 100 90 80 70 60 M E 50 on Z3 40 30 20 10 u 1-Jan-20 1-Feb-20 1-Mar-20 1-Apr-20 1-May-20 1-Jun-20 1-Jul-20 1-Aug-20 1-Sep-20 1-Oct-20 — SMC 1 / 0 PG - SMC2 / Cove Rd Limit 0 • • • 0 0 0 • • a 1-Nov-20 1-Dec-20 1-Jan-21 1-Feb-21 St Marys PM10 HiVol Monitoring Program 5 40 M -E 30 on 20 10 0 a� O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N o c`o a a v o : a�i Q cn Z � li O O CO n Ln M Page189 Cec QUE —— — Lim St Marys 2020 NOx Emissions 4.,ODD 3.,500 3.,OW I.,5 DD 1,000 500 0 2020 N OX Emissions 15� 2020 Allowances 2020 Actual Em izions Page 190 St Marys 2020 SO2 Emissions 7.,000 .5,000 4.000 C C 12 2,000 1,000 2020 SO, Emissions 61 2020 Allo lanc es 2020 Artual Erin unions Page 191 2020 COMMUNITY CONCERNS RECEIVED BY ST MARYS: In the 1st quarter of 2020 we received 4 community concerns 4 -Blast In the 2nd quarter of 2020 we received 3 community concerns 3 - Noise In the 3rd quarter of 2020 we received 23 community concerns 18 - Noise 4 - Dust 1 - Odour In the 4th quarter of 2020 we received 6 community concerns ' 2 - Noise 4 - Blast Page192 Environmental Improvements for the Community St Marys: Scrubber • $23 million investment • Reduces SO2 emissions up to 90% • White water vapour plume is more visible since it is cloud -like and bright white • October 2021- Scrubber recommissioned P. s A r'CIYU IZ70FOoraogo, Pvmps Environmental Improvements for the Community Ultimate Cell Continuous Combustion (UC3) • ECA amendment proposal for installing an UC3 unit as part of the cement kiln • Common use in many industries including approximately 50 cement plants • Improved energy efficiency through the injection of hydrogen and oxygen using a hydrolysis system which splits water into H2 and 02 Alternative Low Carbon Fuel • New MECP permit issued at the end of March 2021 • High quality Alternative Low Carbon Fuel use increasing through highly restrictive acceptance of approved material. mr� e 1164 G CARBON NEUTRALBY2050 VOTORANTIM CIMENTOS 2020 INTEGRATED REPORT Delivering society a carbon neutral concrete by 2050 Clear, innovative and well-defined targets Replacing fossil fuels used in our kilns for biomass and other altern���•� �• �'� Using renewable electricity Recycling concrete Marcelo Castelli Global CEO Votorantim Cimentos GCCA Concrete Future — Roadmap to Net Zero CO, Initial Decade Completing Emissions Progress to deliver the net zero transition O O OUR PATH TO N M' Lo O NET ZERO - O Q Q PAST, PRESENT N W AND FUTURE I I N ACTIONS O Q We can achieve our 0 net zero ambition 0% �OW 1I11II1 jhiiIIIIkTTTdTdTT � N P ae`y 5 Z St Marys Community Engagement St Marys Cement places great value on our relationship with our neighbours and wP believe it is very important to support our local community by sponsoring local charities and organizations that make a difference in the community. Some examples include: • Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Clarington • Bowmanville Hospital Foundation • Their Opportunity • MADD • CLOCA • Autism Home Based Durham • Clarington Older Adult Association • Community Safety Day Page196 Thank You Questions? Page197 23 Harry Lee Crescent 6'111��1F fYa i �'A5: 1 Page198 23 Harry Lee Crescent I 2 Page199 23 Harry Lee Crescent I k Page 200 h J 23 Harry Lee Crescent ol F �ARRY -E R EN OW&V. A rS DO:P-MxnG�-- Tl PiIO 07 OOhFL"W yMTM THE 3MLWZP UTYs GiFAMMG CRITUL& Mr, J�PPRCytb Z 115.01 Yra'ETt LET pFaLIXG ALJm MQ TFE PH93GU6 HOwSE reK r5 tjDNp. n&f PATH TH& d? Nhc0. Th1E MAOP SP M OIUVEWA f LDGAM* OU3 NOT -4yi* 1C' Wilt Abj&ff-nT GFu+EhAM WALP:WA $ L;.AT.�I+6ASm, HYpR"T, WALW- M ANY SMUT .mire bAlf,...... .... ............ REMEIACri 9Y............. ,,,,,............... _..—.—..__....,_......... ,, .,,,,�,•- -OY AREA ,AT Q3 ER.%ME ;WGLLOE. DECK) PRE—LfM MUNI IPAUTY OF ]LOT NO 12 PtM 4au- LEGM 144M FPoI* 45�4 eat+ �cnsuiting nrz�7nrars Ana plonnere •6 �{rraq sT're�t7 C,+.Rr CMr4.AWA.Gr4L_ltd 'a4 PWEcII4H OR FbHOP4E C 4 oa}aa —�600 FAA ('Pa-4741-4 G xNALE i ra4y4�idd��. �crn a a. XL aw Y' P.Q.G. 0*A%M NO. 1.4.4cR- ERY hl 5 �ri'hl - hICAiTHOL�M {PN?, GhTL' .LILY 206C.k.E: 1: 2r+Q 6 �- 15D2& 5 Page 202 23 Harry Lee Crescent Consultants Declaration: This proposal conforms with the Municipality's Grading Criteria and approved subdivision master lot grading plan and the proposed house type is compatible with the grading. The proposed driveway location does not conflict with adjacent driveways, walkways, catchbasin, hydrant, valve or any street utility. Zoning Information: R1-71 Lot area Lot Coverage (Include Deck) C01 Page 203 23 Harry Lee Crescent Please note on Drawing that it says Three Car Garage 7 Page 204 23 Harry Lee Crescent 'N�dY ¢,i'S Pi F- QF HEIGM: 7.P.G,I r..I11 rr To b=?I'Y SERM [ CON HFCTl2N 'r; JEkTS PR TO CMSTR4'C11::N. 1, N;ERSIDEE '-F F }'. yiuc? MA- 6E LO'N_H rr'' / I -. - VA-nD%J hQ-ED DUE IC _MIST. QDMDIT O.S. x AR' I 'x I EX.kvT DEPTH +_Y - }-.MC ':U BE r _ D17FEMINED ON ShE LSUrcINC EXCAVATION %r' FUk FOOTING. UA DtlVL 'SAY ow A Z.3 i 2A COW' LJLTA\IS OF ArApow: T- S PrDfC:iA- M%F09US 'N-ll THE kiUNICIPA'..ITYS �TAIDING C-�ITEHIA AP%: APPRcv-n 5UEVVISION MlrSTER LOT GRADING P-Ara AND 7+I7..-PROPOSED HOUSE TYP- IS 23 Harry Lee Crescent Consultants Declaration: This proposal conforms with the Municipality's Grading Criteria and approved subdivision master lot grading plan and the proposed house type is compatible with the grading. The proposed driveway location does not conflict with adjacent driveways, walkways, catchbasin, hydrant, valve or any street utility. Zoning Information: R1-71 Lot area Lot Coverage (Include Deck) 9 Page 206 Patenaude, Lindsey From: pat young <young64rt@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 10:30 AM To: Young, Renata (MLTSD) Subject: Fwd: Streetlight Relocation Northglen East Phase 3 - Lot 12, 23 Harry Lee Crescent Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged CAUTION -- EXTERNAL E-MAIL - Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender. Begin forwarded message: From: "Richardson, Karen" <KRichardson(a)clarington.net> Subject: RE: Streetlight Relocation Northglen East Phase 3 - Lot 12, 23 Harry Lee Crescent Date: October 18, 2021 at 10:14:00 AM EDT To: pat young <young64rt(o-)gmail.com> Cc: "Brake, Stephen" <SBrake(a)clarington.net>, "Ricciardi, Tony" <TRicciardi(a)clarington.net>, Mayor Shared Mailbox <mayor(a)clarington.net>, "Hooper, Ron" <rhooper(@clarington.net>, "Chambers, Michelle" <MChambers(a)clarington.net> Good morning Renata and Pat, I certainly understand your frustration, unfortunately I can only work with my scope. I have copied Michelle Chambers on this email, please call Michelle at Town Hall 905 623 3379 ext 2101 and she will be able to help you out with registering to speak at Council. I would like to clear up some misunderstood information. The Developer has built the subdivision as required to the Approved Subdivision Drawings. The Builder went in after approval and got permission for 3 car garages (rezoning). The Builder did not take into consideration that Clarington only allows 6m driveway widths maximum, regardless of the number of car garages. When the lot sitings came in for approval (as part of the Building Permit), the 9m wide driveways were denied. As a compromise, the Municipality widen the driveways where permitted. The driveway for your lot is restricted by the streetlight and further impacted when the Builder flipped the lot to accommodate your request. I trust that clarifies the process. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Karen Page 207 Karen Richardson, P.Eng Manager, Development Engineering Public Works Department Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville ON L1 C 3A6 905-623-3379 ext. 2327 1 1-800-563-1195 1905 242 8744 www.clarington.net Fro m: pat young <young64rt@gmail.com> Sent: October 14, 2021 8:46 PM To: Richardson, Karen <KRichardson@clarington.net> Cc: Brake, Stephen <SBrake@clarington.net>; Ricciardi, Tony <TRicciardi@clarington.net>; Mayor Shared Mailbox <mayor@clarington.net>; rhooper@clairington.net Subject: Re: Streetlight Relocation Northglen East Phase 3 - Lot 12, 23 Harry Lee Crescent EXTERNAL Hi Karen We purchased a premium lot and did ask the builder for the lanai to be added to the back of the house, the builder told us that they could do it but needed to flip the house, there was no mention at all that the IightPole was going to be in the way of the driveway of the third garage. It should not matter how the house is flipped there should be enough room on either side of our lot for the driveway, the IightPole should be in a place that it doesn't interfere. I still think this should be moved at developer cost since the property is suppose to accommodate a three car garage either way. This is why we paid the premium for this lot. All the three car garages on our street have the proper driveway width at the bottom to accommodate the three garages. I don't see why this is so difficult to change. How would you feel if you purchased a house and you had a IightPole in front of your garage access. I would like to come in front of Development Counsel Committee to have this rule of 6M or 7.5m waived for this case to accommodate our three car garage. Hope to hear back soon with a date to come in front of the committee to resolve this issue. Thank you, Renata & Pat Young On Oct 14, 2021, at 4:47 PM, Richardson, Karen <KRichardson@clarington.net> wrote: Page 208 Hi Pat and Renata, My apologies, I have not been involved from the beginning. It seems there is a misunderstanding. The streetlight has been installed as per the approved subdivision drawings. It is in the correct location. The driveway conflict is as a result of the changes made to the house siting, requested by you, the purchaser. The Builder has said that he discussed the impacts of the changes with you. The Municipality has a maximum driveway width of 6 metres within the boulevard to allow for utilities, mailboxes, boulevard trees, etc., With the addition of the extra garage to some houses in this neighbourhood, the 6 metre maximum driveway width was overlooked by the Builder. In a compromise, the Municipality agreed to accommodate wider driveways; if the approved subdivision drawings would allow for it. That is why the driveway width in the boulevard is 7.5m instead of the maximum 6m. This is the max width permittable within the boulevard due to streetlight. I was asked to reach out to the Developer, explain the situation and request the streetlight be relocated. The Developer has declined. We reached out to the Builder and the Builder has also declined. This is the information I was asked to forward to you. Karen Richardson, P.Eng Manager, Development Engineering Public Works Department Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville ON 1-1 C 3A6 905-623-3379 ext. 2327 1 1-800-563-1195 1905 242 8744 www.clarington.net From: pat young <young64rt@gmaiLcom> Sent: October 14, 2021 3:33 PM To: Richardson, Karen <KRichardson@clarington.net> Cc: Brake, Stephen <SBrake@clarington.net>; Ricciardi, Tony <TRicciardi@clarington.net>; Mayor Shared Mailbox <mayor@clarington.net>; rhooper@clairington.net Subject: Re: Streetlight Relocation Northglen East Phase 3 - Lot 12, 23 Harry Lee Crescent EXTERNAL Hi Karen As per the email below from Heather Keyzers on behalf of Mayor Foster and Councillor Hooper they are both in agreement that the IightPole needs to be moved, when I spoke to Stephen Brake he told me that the developer Page 209 did not get proper approval for the location of the IightPole. What has changed now? When I talked to Stephen he agreed that the bottom of the driveway should match the top half of the driveway that the IightPole needed to be moved and that the cost should go to the developer since they did not get it proper approval by the city. Renata & Pat Young On Oct 14, 2021, at 2:42 PM, Richardson, Karen <KRichardson@clarington.net> wrote: Good afternoon Pat and Renata, As you have been informed previously, the Municipality will not relocate a streetlight to accommodate driveway locations. On your behalf, we have reached out to the Developer to inquire about the streetlight relocation. The Developer has declined. The streetlights and photometrics were installed according to the approved plans for the subdivision. The Developer has met the requirements as set out by the Subdivision Agreement. We then reached out to the Builder who also declined to relocate the streetlight. The Builder said that the driveway had to be flipped to accommodate the request for a covered porch. In their opinion, this accommodation resulted in the driveway conflict. For this reason, the builder is not willing to relocate the light pole. The driveway will be paved as indicated in the attached siting. Thanks, Karen Karen Richardson, P.Eng Manager, Development Engineering Public Works Department Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville ON L1 C 3A6 905-623-3379 ext. 2327 1 1-800-563-1195 1905 242 8744 Page 210 www.clarington.net From: pat young <young64rt@gmail.com> Sent: October 13, 2021 2:43 PM To: Brake, Stephen <SBrake@clarington.net> Cc: Richardson, Karen <KRichardson@clarington.net>; Ricciardi, Tony <TRicciardi@clarington.net>; Davidson, Colin <CDavidson@clarington.net>; Gupta, Devang <DGupta@clarington.net> Subject: Re: IightPole EXTERNAL Hi Karen We just received a note on our door that the paving company will be scheduleing one more trip to Bowmanville weather permitting to pave the Boulevard/Apron. I am concerned that if the IightPole is not moved before they pave the end of the drive they will need to be extended the lower part of the driveway to match the upper part and they would need to patch the lower park of the driveway and I think that will look terrible. Thanks Renata Young On Oct 1, 2021, at 9:16 AM, Brake, Stephen <SBrake@clarington.net> wrote: Hi Renata, Thanks for providing the update. Staff have reached out to the developer and are currently awaiting a response. The installation of sidewalk shouldn't be a problem but ideally the final location for the streetlight pole should be confirmed before the curb is poured. Regards, Stephen Brake Page 211 Director Public Works Department Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville ON L1 C 3A6 905-263-2291 ext. 2903 1 1-800-563-1195 www.clarington.net From: pat young [mailto:young64rt@gmail.com] Sent: September 29, 2021 4:20 PM To: Brake, Stephen <SBrake@clarington.net> Subject: Re: IightPole IYou don't often get email from young64rt@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL Hi Stephen, Just wanted to let you know that this notice was left in our door this afternoon. And they are already starting the work. Thanks Renata and Pat Young our door this afternoon. And they are already starting the work. Thanks Renata and Pat Young On Sep 28, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Brake, Stephen <SBrakekclarin on.net> wrote: Hi Pat and Renata, 6 Page 212 Could you please provide me with a phone number so that we can discuss this matter. Thanks, Stephen Brake Director Public Works Department Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville ON L1 C 3A6 905-263-2291 ext. 2903 1 1-800- 563-1195 www.clarington.net From: fro Sent: September 28, 2021 2:09 PM To: young64rt@gmail.com Cc: Hooper, Ron <rhooper@clarington.net>; Brake, Stephen <SBrake@clarington.net> Subject: FW: IightPole Good Afternoon Pat & Renata Mayor Foster is in receipt of your correspondence below and wishes to respond as follows: "Dear Pat and Renata, At your request, staff have been looking into the situation and how it came about. Staff and both Councillor Hooper and I have taken the time to visit the location and we are all in agreement that the pole should be moved. I understand from your earlier e- mail that the developer has agreed to move the pole, however, I believe it is your preference that the pole be moved further than what the developer is proposing. Page 213 Staff will reach out to you to determine what your wishes are and what can and will be done. Thank you Adrian Foster Mayor" On behalf of Mayor Foster. Thank you Heather Keyzers, AMCT (she/her) Office Co- ordinator Mayor's Office 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville ON L1 C 3A6 905-623-3379 ext. 2005 1 1-800- 563-1195 www.clarington.net From: pat young <young64rt@gmail.com> Sent: September 27, 2021 12:31 PM To: Hooper, Ron <rhooper@clarington.net> Cc: Mayor Shared Mailbox <mayor@clarington.net> Subject: Re: IightPole ISome people who received this message don't often get email from young64rt@gmail.com.Learn why this is important EXTERNAL Hi Mr. Hooper Thank you for looking into this for us, your help in rectifying this issue is greatly appreciated. s Page 214 If you are not able to help we would like to come in -front of the council to bring this issue up for a vote to have this light pole moved. Our neighbour has no issue with the light moving more to his side he is willing to help if needed. Please note the house in -front of us had a variance to move their house forward closer to the road so they can have a bigger back yard and it was approve so I do understand why moving a light pole over to clear our path to enter our driveway is a big issue. Its not if we are asking to remove the light pole completely. Thank you, Pat & Renata Young On Sep 24, 2021, at 8:53 PM, Hooper, Ron <rhooper@clarington.n et> wrote: Hello: Thank You for your email. I will forward and discuss your email with staff. I apologise for the late response. Regards, Ron Hooper Get Outlook for Android From: pat young <young64rt@gmail.com Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 4:12:13 PM To: Mayor Shared Mailbox <mayor@clarington.net >; Hooper, Ron <rhooper@clarington.n 9 Page 215 et> Cc: Renata Young <renata.young@ontario .ca> Subject: IightPole Some people who received this message don't often get email fromyoung64rt@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL Hello Just touching base, We haven't heard back from either one of you. Is there someone that we can speak with? Thanks Pat & Renata Young <ima e001.'p > <image002.jpg> <ima e003.' > <ima e004.' p > <Sidewalk construction.pdf> <ima e001.'p > <ima e002.jp > I<image003.'p > <ima e004.'p > <Lot 12 Harry Lee Cr Northglen Ph 3.pdf> a❑❑ 10 Page 216 J OJ❑J❑ 11 Page 217 Delegation of W Bracken to Clarington Joint Committee October 25, 2021 Joint Agenda Item 9.1.3 — Motion Requesting Provincial Review of 0. Regulation 79/15 Page 218 Please Support Motion Requesting a Full Review of Regulation 79/15 (suggest Bullet 3 edit to "verify that *adverse* cumulative effects *are* not occurring" That the Municipality of Clarington respectfully requests the Provincial Government undertake a full review of O.Reg. 79115 under the Environmental Protection Act with a view to: • Providing greater control and monitoring of fuel content and on the emissions from approved facilities to ensure the advancement of C3HG reduction is not being achieved at the cost of impacted air quality or community health, • Ensuring the cumulative effects of proposals on communities is considered as part of a thorough and comprehensive assessment of applications for AL F use; and • Providing mechanisms to monitor and verify that cumulative effects at not occurring and a fulsome analysis to ensure GHG reductions are being achieved by fuel switching. That a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Honourable David Piccini, Minister of Environment., Conservation and Parks, MPP (Northumberland -Peterborough South) and Lindsey Park, MPP (Durham), Page 219 Long -Standing Concerns With 0. Reg 79/15 Remain Unaddressed and Need Attention • Many alternative fuels permitted contain, or are contaminated with, or create as a by-product of their combustion, highly toxic contaminants • For example: treated wood, shingles, used carpets, plastics, treated textiles, tire fluff • Furthermore, Reg 79/15 imposes no limits on amount or percentages of these materials for use in fuel blends, no limits on important fuel parameters including halogen content • For example: St Marys Bowmanville - 2015 ECA contained limit that fuel blend could be no more than 5% treated wood, 10% plastic but limit was removed in recent April 2021 ECA Page 220 BACK DOOR PASS: Reg. 79/15 Exempts Industries Burning Garbage From Requiring Waste ECA and From Requirements under Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/150079 Exemption from s. 27 of Act 3. (1) Section 27 of the Act does not apply to the use, operation, establishment, alteration, enlargement or extension of an alternative low -carbon fuel site if the following conditions are satisfied: 1. An ALCF application was made and an environmental compliance approval is in effect, including a statement by the Director that this section applies in respect of the site. 2. The use, operation, establishment, alteration, enlargement or extension is carried out in relation to one or more of the following activities at the site respecting fuel described in paragraph 1 of the definition of "alternative low -carbon fuel" in subsection 1 (1): I. Collection of the fuel. ii. Storage of the fuel, if the following conditions are met: A. None of the fuel is stored for more than 18 months. B. The maximum amount of the fuel stored is the amount that is reasonably capable of being combusted at the site during a period of six months. C. The fuel stored is to be combusted at the site. iii. Drying of the fuel using the heat generated from the process of manufacturing clinker, time, iron, steel or metallurgical coke. iv. Removal of incidental amounts of non-combustible materials from the fuel. v. Size reduction of the fuel. vi. Blending of the fuel with coal, coke or any other fuel. vii. Combustion of the fuel. Page 221 Respected Environmental Groups, Law Associations, Citizens Registered Major Concerns When 0. Reg 79/15 was First Released in 2015 • For example, the Canadian Environmental Law Association (CELA) stated: "...the proposal would purport to remove the designation of this type of activity (burning ostensibly "alternative fuels" but actually waste materials) from the authority of the Environmental Assessment Act ("EAA). If a proposed activity ever warranted the application of the EAA it is this one given the potential for increased atmospheric releases of certain toxic substances." Canadian Environmental Law Association (CELA) Blog: The Alternative Fuels Environmental Three -Step: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back Page 222 Approval Conditions in Re 79/15 are Shockingly Light: 1) A Carbon Dioxide Emission Intensity Report and 2) Completion of Consultation Requirements https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/150079 Approval, conditions 4. The Director shall not issue an environmental compliance approval in respect of an ALCF application unless the following conditions are satisfied: 1. The application includes a carbon dioxide emission intensity report in respect of the alternative low -carbon fuel proposed to be combusted at the site, prepared in accordance with section 11, that includes a statement that the carbon dioxide emission intensity of the alternative low -carbon fuel is less than the carbon dioxide emission intensity of the coal or coke in the place of which the alternative low -carbon fuel is proposed to be combusted. 2. If the application is in respect of a demonstration project, 3. If the application is not in respect of a demonstration project, the application includes a statement by the proponent confirming that the proponent has complied with the notice and consultation requirements in this Regulation and that a copy of the consultation report prepared in accordance with section 8 is available on the proponent's website and will be provided to a person who requests it. Page 223 Carbon Dioxide Emission Intensity Analysis: Only One Sample of ALCF Required https://www.onta rioxa/laws/regu lation/150079 Sampling and analysis, alternative low -carbon fuel 10. (1) The carbon dioxide emission intensity of a fuel proposed to be combusted as an alternative low -carbon fuel, rounded to three significant digits, shall be determined according to the following formula: where, Carbon dioxide emission intensity = CCnon-bio" 3.67/HHV CCnon-bio = the non -biological carbon content of the fuel, HHV = the high heat value of the fuel. (2) The total carbon content and high heat value of a fuel proposed to be combusted as an alternative low -carbon fuel shall be determined using samples of the fuel taken and analyzed in accordance with the following rules: 1. Only samples taken within 36 months before the determination is made shall be used. 2. One of the following methods shall be applied: i. Analysis in accordance with a prescribed chemical analysis method of at least one sample of the fuel. ii. Analysis in accordance with a prescribed chemical analysis method of at least one sample of each of the individual materials that the fuel is composed of or derived from, using a weighted average of the carbon content and high heat value of the individual materials. 3. The number of samples analyzed must provide results that are sufficiently representative of the fuel or individual materials and must allow for adequate characterization of the fuel or individual materials. Page 224 Inadequate as Chemical Composition Varies Widely in Waste Materials Burned (Ex. St Marys Demonstration Project Below); Unlimited Different Blends Are Possible Table 3-5 - Median Results of Laboratory Tests Completed on Alternative Fuel Parameter Units Alternative Fuel Used During Trial 1 (Median Value) Alternative Fuel Used During Trial (Median Value) Calorific Value MJIkg 17.491 16.5 Moisture Content % wt. 18.04 20.49 Total Halogen Content % wt. 0.18 1.36 Total Chlorine % wt. 0.16 1.32 Sulfur %wt. 0.166 0.19 Carbon %wt. 41.74 38.82 h Content % wt. 5.04 4.36 Antimony Stt u ! a0.1 18.475 Arsenic As u ! a0.1 a0.1 Barium Ba uqlq 25.9 37.725 Beryllium Be u ! a0.1 a0_1 Cadmium Cd u ! a0.1 a0_1 Chromium Cr ug/g 9 13.3 Cobalt Co u ! a0.1 0.95 Iron Fe UgIg 581.6 941.95 Lead(Pb)u ! a0.1 a0.1 Manganese Mn u ! 33.8 65.35 Nickel Ni UgIg 4.8 4.725 Selenium Se u ! a0.1 a0.1 Silver u 1 a0.1 a0.1 Tin Sn u ! a0.1 a0.1 Vanadium V u ! a0.1 a0.1 Mercury H ug/g a0.001 -tA.001 Fuel sampling conducted during the project showed that the ALCF blends used in each trial differed considerably in total halogen content and heavy metal content, among other parameters, and the reasons for this variation were "unclear." HDR Consultants, Alternative Fuel Demonstration Project Summary Waste Report (May 2019), online: http://www.stmaryscement.com/Alternative°/a20Low%2OCarbon%2OFuels%2ODocuments/Alternative%2OFuel%20 Demo nstration%20Project%2OSummary%20Waste%2OReport%2OFina1%20JUNE%202019%20w%20appe icesml df at pp 15 (Table 3-5) and 16 age5� Inadequate Monitoring Requirements Reg. 79/15 Only Requires NOx and S02_Stack Emissions Monitoring (and MECP has even proposed to remove that reporting requirement) • Burning garbage releases toxic emissions; • To protect the public, ambient air and environmental monitoring needs to be required for toxic pollutants associated with burning garbage including PM2.5, heavy metals, dioxins/furans, PAHs, PFAs but Red. 79/15 does not require such monitoring Quarterly reporting 15. (1) This section applies to the holder of an environmental compliance approval issued in respect of an ALCF application if the application, (a) is not in respect of a demonstration project; and (b) is in respect of an alternative low -carbon fuel facility at which clinker is manufactured. O. Reg. 5412l , s.1 (1). (1.1) The holder of an environmental compliance approval mentioned in subsection (1) shall ensure that emissions of nitrogen oxides and sulphur dioxide from a kiln located at the alternative low -carbon fuel facility referred to in clause (1) (b) are monitored during the year with, (a) a continuous emissions monitoring system, installed and operated in accordance with Report EPS 1/PG17; or (b) a method that, in the opinion of the Director, will provide estimates of nitrogen oxides and sulphur dioxide emissions that are at least as accurate as the estimates that would be provided by a continuous emissions monitoring system referred to in clause (a). O. Reg. 54/21, s.1 (1). Page 226 Comprehensive Ambient Air and Environmental Monitoring Especially important for Communities with Burdened Air Sheds • this includes Clarington where numerous ambient air exceedances have been measured including for: • particulate matter • benzo(a)pyrene • SOZ • dioxins/furans • Clarington is an agricultural community - total mass loading to the environment (land, water, agricultural products) should be monitored Page 227 Problems With Reliance on O. Reg 419/05 • MECP relies on O. Reg 419/05 to assess proposals,but,even if an industry conducts a cumulative effects assessment, it relies on O.Reg. 419/05 as well • Problems with O. Reg 419/05 include: • Inhalation pathway focused • Based on modelled POI air concentrations, not on total annual loadings of contaminants • Assesses risk based on exceeding thresholds, but many pollutants, including PM2.5 are non -threshold • For many of the pollutants of concern with burning waste, the standards are many decades old and considered not protective of human health or DO NOT EXIST (PM2.5, PM0.1, PFAs) • Does not look at preventing "hot spots" • Does not look at synergistic effects Under cover of claim they will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, with Reg 79/15, MECP circumvents waste ECA and EAA requirements and rushes fo approve burning waste proposals without the benefit of the scrutiny that the environmental assessment processIMM'd bring to address these rlPfi6PnriPG Reg 79/15 Fails to Require Monitoring/Reporting of GHG Emissions; No Verification of GHG Reduction Claims • Carbon Dioxide Emission Intensity Report calculations/predictions are based on fuel samples analysis and are not enough • Need monitoring and reporting of actual emissions of greenhouse gases when waste is burned Page 229 St Marys' Carbon Dioxide Emission Intensity Report predicted significantly lower CO2intensities, but measured CO2 Emissions Were Actually Slightly Higher in Dec 2018 ALCF Trial Excerpt of Table E-1-1 below from BCX Environmental Consulting, Alternative Fuels Demonstration Project Summary Report (May 2019), online: http://www.stmaryscement.com/Alternative%20Low%2OCarbon%2OFuels%2ODocuments/Demonstration%2OPer mit%20-%20Air%20-%20ECA%204614-826K9W.pdf at Table E-1-1 (pdf p 698) Table E-1-1: Summary of Kiln Stack Emissions Contaminant CAS Number Kiln Stack Emission Rate (g/s) Alt Fuel Emissions Outside the BaseJinin Normal Range (YsJN Statistically Significant Change in Emissions between Alt Fuel and Baseline/Post Baseline? (Yes/No) Baseline (Oct 2018� Alt Fuel pec 201B) Post Baseline (Dec 2018) Particulate PM PIM 2.02E+00 4.17E+00 4,17 E+00 Yes Yes PM 10 PM10 4.61E-01 5.08E-01 3.86E-01 Yes Yes PIM 2.5 PM2.5 1.84E-01 7.12E-01 1.75E-01 Yes Yes Combustion Gases NOx 10102-44-0 5.94E+01 8.67E+01 9.73E+01 Yes Yes 502 7446-09-5 1.37E+02 1.69E+07 1.14E+02 Yes Yes (— ] 610-flak-0 1 1qF+O? 1.00F+n) 7 49F+01 Nn nfa C0 2 1273 S-9 5.96E+04 5.59E+04 5.51E+04 No n f a Page 230 Please Support Motion Today (with Bullet 3 "verify that *adverse* cumulative effects *are* not occurring" That the Municipality of Clarington respectfully requests the Provincial Government undertake a full review of O.Reg. 79f15 under the Environmental Protection Act with a view to: • Providing greater control and monitoring of Fuel content and on the emissions from approved facilities to ensure the advancement of GHG reduction is not being achieved at the cost of impacted air quality or community health, • Ensuring the cumulative effects of proposals on communities is considered as part of a thorough and comprehensive assessment of applications for ►EL F use-, and • Providing mechanisms to monitor and verify that cumulative effects at not occurring and a fulsome analysis to ensure GHG reductions are being achieved by fuel switching - That a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Honourable David Piccini, Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks, MPP (Northumberland -Peterborough South) and Lindsey Park, MPP (Durharn)- Page 231 Delegation of W Bracken to Clarington Joint Committee October 25, 2021 St. Marys Cement's application to amend their current ECA to install an "Ultimate Cell Continuous Combustion Unit" in the cement kiln in Bowmanville (ERC) 019-4320) Page 232 Supporting Information Document BCX AMENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING August 12, 2021 BCX File: 1002-01.64 Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Client Services and Permissions Branch 135 St. Clair Avenue West, 1" Floor Toronto, Ontario M4V 1P5 RE: ST. MARYS CEMENT INC (CANADA) — BCIWMANVILLE CEMENT PLANT ENVIRONMENTALLY INSIGNIFICANT AMENDMENT—ECA #5729-BYRJEP On behalf of St. Marys Cement Inc. (Canada) [5MC], BCX Environmental Consulting (BCX) is pleased to submit an application and supporting documentation for an environmentally insignificant amendment to SIu1C's Environmental Compliance Approval #6729-BYRJEP dated March 31, 2021, for their Bowmanville cement plant (Attachment B). The Facility is proposing to install an Ultimate Cell Continuous Combustion (UC3) Unit as part of the "Cement Kiln". The purpose of the UC3 unit is to optimize the combustion environment in the kiln by creating an oxygen rich environment. The installation of the UC3 System is not expected to increase air emissions from the facility for the maximum air emissions scenarios. Equipment information on the UC3 system and air emissions data/case studies for cement plants using the UC3 systems is included as an appendix to the Emission Inventory and Dispersion Modelling Report {Attachment D) to support that this is an environmentally insignificant change from an air quality perspective. Page 233 Page 93 of Supporting Information Document states UC3 Technology will "promote complete combustion of alternative fuels" Ernlission Summary and dispersion ModelAng Report St. Marys Cement Inc. (Canada) — Bnwmanville Plant BCX File; 1003-01.64 The Proposed UC3 System August 2021 Page 5 The proposed UC3 system will use a Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) electrolysis system and is designed to optimize combustion in the kiln. The UC3 system will integrate an automatic electrolyte production unit which will produce hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (02) using fresh water through an electrolysis process. These gases will then be introduced in the air transport pipes, which transfers the gases to the fuel injection paints, ending in the burning zone of the kiln (see Figure 1). When Hz and 02 enter the kiln, the significant amount of thermal energy in the kiln will transform these gases into highly reactive hydroxy (OH) radicals. The OH radicals will react with carbon monoxide (CO) inside the kiln to promote complete combustion. In addition, heat generated from the consumption of CO will improve the combustion efficiency of the fuels (convention al/ALCF) in the kiln, clinker quality and process stability. Optimizing the kiln combustion efficiency using this technology will also promote complete combustion of the low carbon alternative fuels thereby providing added assurance that alternative fuels can be consistently fed and combusted at the approved maximum rate. The addition of this technology will not reduce the residence times, temperatures or residual oxygen levels in the kiln system. Supporting information on this technology is presented in Appendix B. The amount of heat generated from Hz produced by the UC3 unit is insignificant relative to the overall kiln heat input (i.e. less than 0.016% of the total kiln heat input). As such, Hz generated from the unit is not acting or intended to act as a fuel. Page 234 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon monoxide Reaction results in more carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and ozone; but demonstration study done without these units installed so did not measure UO emission impacts; Any additional GHG emissions/impacts should also be monitored and accounted for in future Role in ground level ozone formation [edit] Main article: Ground level ozone Carbon monoxide is, along with aldehydes, part of the series of cycles of chemical reactions that form photochemical smog. It reacts with hydroxyl radical ('OH) to produce a radical intermediate'HOCO, which transfers rapidly its radical hydrogen to 02 to form peroxy radical (H02') and carbon dioxide (CO2).i341 Peroxy radical subsequently reacts with nitrogen oxide (NO) to form nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and hydroxyl radical. Nat gives 0(3P) via photolysis, thereby forming 03 following reaction with 02. Since hydroxyl radical is formed during the formation of Nat, the balance of the sequence of chemical reactions starting with carbon monoxide and leading to the formation of ozone is: CO + 202 + hv — CO2 + 03 (where by refers to the photon of light absorbed by the NO2 molecule in the sequence) Although the creation of NO2 is the critical step leading to low level ozone formation, it also increases this ozone in another, somewhat mutually exclusive way, by reducing the quantity of NO that is available to react with ozone.[31 Page 235 Appendix C Contains "UC3 Emissions Data" 7-page Document authored by UC3 Manufacturer UC3 Technology impacts vi S UTiS susrANAB' F coABUSTUN SYSTR4S Page 236 Contains many anecdotal comments, but Supporting Scientific Evidence/Information and Underlying Documents are Missing; Nothing Provided to Verify Claims for Metals, Dioxins/Furans 3.2 Impacts on emissions With a wide application of the technology ire more than 50 cements plants, it's consistent that the M technology does not aggravate the level of atmospheric emissions, and in most cases, it even decreased its levels (as the explained below). From the extended operation of the UC-1 terhnoingy in these plants, it was not rietec.teii any changes in other emissions profile, such as metals, dioxins and furans. Page 237 UTiS Claims CO, NOx, S02 emissions reduced, but very limited data provided is not referenced, no underlying docs provided making claims unverifiable • For example, for reduced CO claim, the following graphs provided, but underlying information, facility information for case study not provided, making it untraceable Case study 1 Case study 2 CO '. 675 � 1 4i0 • • • • • • M • 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 ■ CO — —Ma Ilse CO • UC30WOFF W ­n..a.— — � x � qA3 am • . �1 �e fl R .00 .mac. owlec� Page 238 BCX Report (page 1 of pdf) Relies on UTiS Doc to Support Assertion That UC3 installation is "environmentally insignificant amendment" and therefore "exempt from EBR requirements" A--aa BCX Adw AMENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING August 12, 2021 BCX File: 1003-01.64 Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Client Services and Permissions Branch 135 St. Clair Avenue West, 111 Floor Toronto, Ontario M4V 1P5 RE: ST. MARYS CEMENT INC (CANADA) — BOWMANVILLE CEMENT PLANT ENVIRONMENTALLY INSIGNIFICANT AMENDMENT —ECA #6729-BYRJEP On behalf of St. Marys Cement Inc. (Canada) [SMC], BCX Environmental Consulting (BCX) is pleased to submit an application and supporting documentation for an environmentally insignificant amendment to SMC's Environmental Compliance Approval #6729-BYRIEP dated March 31, 2021, for their Bowmanville cement plant (Attachment B). The Facility is proposing to install an Ultimate Cell Continuous Combustion (UC3) Unit as part of the "Cement Kiln". The purpose of the UC3 unit is to optimize the combustion environment in the kiln by creating an oxygen rich environment. The installation of the UC3 system is not expected to increase air emissions from the facility for the maximum air emissions scenarios. Equipment information on the UC3 system and air emissions data/case studies for cement plants using the UC3 systems is included as an appendix to the Emission Inventory and Dispersion Modelling Report (Attachment D) to support that this is an environmentally insignificant change from an air quality perspective. Page 239 Important Sections/Information Redacted in ESDM Section of Document Here Kiln Stack Emissions (Appendix F, page 168 of pdf); ALCF Tonnages Redacted -he -"0 um oFche 208 xwD! wmr-4 reNll4rarcvwrd)wo1' n e 4rrnm Ins 1%Lar': n _-drmhLer-aMmj and ahemwweiW 44j-7D15a0emmmauon u'rd 2,1 i262 kzmrrts,+dar.'j m&Wncroslad �rx exh cmurnmrt -a ararm rre Kee: rnllunrn em uns FCer w%.er11rGrr1 f&M4i ';: i rL d k1ptgwl:W%R fta- :, in Lh12D1#mlreile'JMgrmki%r im mrWaN4 a.3di Nerllorre fulkh&d hhtlnaQr *d Hirmrdon QUHQ1d91 [dlrrar TsIon mY 4 Eme)n roes r.ers+el mmxee umphele n■hw la?;ars Frrd Cie Gr.OG7ed1UCI Mr4V" t9tr14eF 7M rr;h3WWU MPdk!d W;- WNrh remix cDPM CL, 93a P41-6 and CO, kFr i k emnlom ve dwtlaxd 6r mMkQsai dlerin WMM r111leWbMd as P34MO110vrlad-!Wp-'!M AJ SUdl,e-bOmp Ke r-m emamzd TD dranRwhh rriChaiud sutrdwmn rm! and,cL"u%d1aemWKr rmeFt w d1e2G1Ssmm1msr wwtu" fer -1Y 1d16I 1:rrrr Fwl cNy+rirli�rr::...• Imr.r�d4'•a Idry'3444 at1Frr1Pm4 rr,L 1104 a 0 - Sau &7mrHgEFP! d Cr mM Ii1,I:13LON+ hr1 a 1741hrfd++1f F4Ca mpilan Pw, itLee tTmrK!AarYn&srtbzmrlhriwij.!FeF&fMMerllAhWbWbdrtEb4r.I1MrW&fddl+17dr MhF+pYri3W%-E�.rLV18Mi1IFdr1OSrWIA'KAkMn.fft&d+d+r]rf3dvd�JMr}LfiW3W ttrF• 3h> T.rtreeeALCF(V4. rrc.fjA&i6hFrrr..l Dam L=bptb3n xWjt .irsn'I afldniZC.�. atLWICOO F■N €u%,Mk� r IrowedrF1 K IiMWVM K IIhr(YjWI SerrLr'e IIIrR Ek ud ALOF 23i1lkW • EhrWMF&l1 P40 OmjAM,4+4r, hawjda I )r IddWfMM K IdIrIW+EFsri WMDOO KNOCdn+nyl".cr,c IRawidrr)), lid )r Idkrj3W* Mwr = Snircir hvif! Ft *FiICFJdrF- FF6 Idhwo F]i Fw4 CrrNMTO %,. Ihi�edrrF■ 11~3,SM a 11hrf7/a0I ► d4 O&haWaWbh%Ej rr rI+Y.Sif k: f72kvOghiFk IdYrf3FSj PMrAl.d e■ MOCF 3AW04 • 9F,.51 rurl MM1WMbffl &,_ 11arr gdrF1 r IdnJZ4e)J flWAUK ] PrdrMt-10 CO w3wy2bDwM No - Ere, kftMhtl1 FreF OA4bFiid.AwFlenrFV3Po.' kiY4W2MM tkhrj3NU}-EFLc. WobWjM Wet (mgmVllm.. , "t-fdell K IdMWM' w1 K jdh IVAD1 Froowo ER ui ALEF ID" 40) - EhrlG&--1 l FMe� 009200 11hr13W%* 0.xr40lnnrl0 r-+[rruxrao+r r,tr h—Odanl l' lidala 2Mr1 h:d1? 31M W ndr#d r7 k�ii - iraWrum Yqh' nh r rhrPF rn Idr+1 t USwra TMMCOMM Fkarlrmg MMfaaoMCv xbody iamY. dorsr dhiVrYAmhI.Nll.il rmkwn r.rF=n lejhirr PO ON A'rrn7 M d rir d E-ISFan ErN511en O5Mt.Yd f.1N � N g~t I141F7T1 CS-etr"tnW ■1Fe1 471Vf9 IY8 rd1 riNerY lr 1}r.r i.d rr: trrr 011i C60M1 foci toa01 .! iOWi FdLq lCW 3ME) ftM G4reflit of Cr ..tbrJ 1Ye1 F%W ALCF-MM iFhnp—� Ash- rPC%M&j . 21a72rd Wffl:e�-OkV 4s+;:per 2AIA IlFati R�rail IeF'1 �rrrh VGA ka �r .7aWr, er r:7•L1•? I 49efrO9 1 a ,r.er I 4,r.C+4i I &WE— I 7aN.+s7 I g33E.W I I I I SLM4L I i173E-OL I V-%" ahr' S,Ioh_� parbe •'++4 % E 1 13?E1W I I L==.02 I l.42f+#2 I Li&E+IP I 1 G&E1#2 I 125E 10 1 69= i02 1 1 0-02 1 V 5- I Akn, Aw a• y b� k' ." 9r 1 %)0 AO I _.LMLW L PM I d.kE.R L 1 OE-IR L ifi7E-h I L j 1 31: -Q 1 1 31-.02 j %•5" L a6-,v Ava• t• k+irini. .i.:t1:.fI 5.9JL Kw I 4.kA •.11 r '.11k -17 I '.771 -71: F ': 414 : 71. r '• 1-11 ::W I I V.1 -1-I 1 V-,- JYIrxW.•.v•rr Page 240 Appendix H on page 225 of pdf Completely redated Appendix H Material Composition information Page 241 ERO Comments Due This Friday, October 29th • Please ensure Clarington comments • Timing of this application is questionable, coming right after approval to burn 400 tonnes/day of expanded wastes • Insufficient information and documentation provided • Also concerns with lack of details on flammability and explosion risk with HZ and OZ • All COZ and GHG emissions must be accounted for • Impact on GHGs should have been assessed • No sidestepping of reporting by asserting Hydrogen not a fuel Page 242 Clarington Oct. 25, 2021 Agenda Item 9.1.3. New Business - Provincial Review of Ontario Regulation 79/15: Alternative Low - Carbon Fuels of the Environmental Protection Act (O. Reg 79/15 proposed revisions found in ERO 019-3544) Submitted by Linda Gasser Page 243 Councillor Zwart I s motion That the Municipality of Clarington respectfully requests the Provincial Government undertake a full review of O.Reg. 79/15 under the Environmental Protection Act with a view to: • Providing greater control and monitoring of fuel content and on the emissions from approved facilities to ensure the advancement of GHG reduction is not being achieved at the cost of impacted air quality or community health; • Ensuring the cumulative effects of proposals on communities is considered as part of a thorough and comprehensive assessment of applications for ALCF use; and • Providing mechanisms to monitor and verify that cumulative effects at not occurring and a fulsome analysis to ensure GHG reductions are being achieved by fuel switching. Please consider also addressing deficient public consultation requirements. I provide examples on following slides. Page 244 Challenge accessing project materials for both St. Marys 2020 and current 2021 ERO postings • Current ECA was approved March 31, 2021 • July — August 2020 ERO 019-2055: posting and comment period. NO SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION WHATSOEVER was provided with posting, not even St. Marys website shown in posting. • Key document (Emissions Summary Dispersion Modelling Report) was not posted to St. Marys website and had to be requested via MECP and SMC consultants. Not all interested parties would be aware that this report was available and could be requested. • St. Marys' consultant provided a time limited non shareable link, with document provided as large file which could be downloaded but not easily shared with others. Page 245 Less than 6 months after ECA approval, St. Marys filing new application ERO 019-4320 • Though SMC and their consultants know I am a long time interested party (since 2008� I was not notified by the proponent of new application • Because I registered to get ERO notices on certain topics, I received a link to this latest current ERO notice. • Initial ERO posting provided such limited information that a few days later it was revised to include a bit more detail —comment extended to October 29, 2021. • Again, NO supporting documentation provided with ERO posting and the St. Marys website not shown. • Again I had to request project documents via MECP and the Proponent. This time, MECP sent a secure message that would only be available for five days expiring on the Thanksgiving Sunday. • Required me to open an account and download a large document compilation — all individual documents should have been available on St. Marys website. Page 246 MECP reply regarding request for application documents that should be publicly available and posted to the proponent's website From Environmental Permissions (MECP)< enviropermissionstbontario.cal* `7 Reply I -� Reply All I I. Uorevard I CnArchive I f) Junk Jul More` Subject RE W here can I firrd supporting dxuri for St. Marys ECA amerrdment FRO 019-4320 2021-10-04, 3:46 P.m. To Linda Gasser* Cc Environmental Permissions (MECP) < erwiropermissiomtbciri*, Sean_Capstick@golder. corn <Sean Ca pstick@gold eacoma *, Ruben Plaza* Hi Linda, Thank you for your request- In order to proceed with your request, we must review the file prior to it being available for viewing - Members of the public can view records submitted to the Ministry of the Environment Conservation and Parks as part of an application for an [insert Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) or Permit to Take Water (l Some information in the file, however, may not be viewed through a public file viewing due to policy considerations and the application of the Freedom of lnforri and Protection of Privacy Act. If there appears to be information in the file that the proponent (ECAIPTTW applicant) considers to be confidential we will notify the proponent that a third -party information request has been received and will ask the proponent to consent to the release of the information. If the proponent does not consent then the information cannot be viewed through a public file viewing. Any personal information in the file will also not be available for public viewing. In summary, the following information will not be available through a public file viewing: a. Information marked "Confidential" by the proponent where the proponent has not consented to release the information e, MECP internal communications c, Personal information If you are not satisfied with the information available in the public viewing file, you maywish to consider submitting a Freedom of Information (i request to the MECP- You may contact the Freedom of Information and Privacy Office at 416-314-4075 or by email at foi mecp@ontario ca for more information Information regarding the POI process can be found here https 11www ontano_calgovernmenUhow-make-freedom-information-request (section-5 For more information regarding the Freedom of Information and Protection of PniAct — FIPPA. you may visit the Ontario website at: htti11www.ontado. callawslstalutef90f31 Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any further questions or concerns. Regards, Megan Chapman (on behalf of Enviropermissions) client Service Representative Customer Seances Unit I Client Semces & Permissions Branch (CSPB) Ontario Ministry ofthe Environment, Consecration and Parks (MECP) 136 St. Clair Ave. West 1st Floor, Toronto ON M4V 1P5 ene Gral Inquiries I Eca I T: 41b-3148001 1 F: 416-314-8452 Please consider the environment before prinhhg this email Did you know?Atthis time, tine ministry stranglyencoural- online submissions far some—nmentsl permissions You ran submit your appliration and supporting documents,make payments, and hackapplrration progress online- Formom mkrrmation, please visit tine ministry aebsrle or you mayconted flea Client Services and Pa missrons Branch by phone at 4161 or 1-6G0461-6290 orby emart at Page 247 5 File accessible for only five days. Some documents have redacted sections n mega—hapmangontan-a* `7 Rerl; -4 F.-- pArch-rue Junk w 0elete More -t Supporting Materials for ERE) 019-432C 2021-10-05, 4:04 p.m. o Linda Ga=-=-er* Ontario Chapman, Megan {MECP} sent you a secure message Hi Linda, As requested, please seethe attached supporting documents for ERO 019-4320. Thanks, Megan Chapman 5-- o, kitework s TD Attachments expire on Oct 10, 2021 ® 1 PDF SMC Bi Env l nsig Amendment Publi c. pdf This message requires that you sign in to access the message and any file attachments. You have received attachment link(s) within this email message sent via Enterprise AttachmentTmnsfer Service. To retrieve the attachmeM[s], please click on the link{sj.lf you have any difficulty accessing the file using the enclosed link, please log into the Application first at th a fo I lowing location http://attachmaii.c ritaric.ca/ Page 248 6 From St. Marys' Application dated Aug. 11/21 re Consultation (page 10 of 38) Previous page references Indigenous Consultation -none Other Consultation/Notification: Has the applicant had a ministry pre -application consultation in relation to the proposed project? " ❑ Yes 0 No If this application is for a waste disposal site, have the neighbour notification requirements been completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please attach a Public Consultation/Notification Report that includes the notice and list of recipients. If no, please select the reason for not undertaking neighbour notification. ❑ Application is for an administrative amendment ❑ The proposal was subject to public consultation through an Environmental Assessment process ❑ other please explain Are there any other consultaticnlnotification activities that have been undertaken to fulfill requirements by other legislation or through voluntary efforts? ❑ Yes 0 No If yes, please. 1. describe the con sultationlnotification activities below; and 2. attach documents describing each of these ccnsultationlnotification activities; any changes to the project as a result of these activities and any planned consultaticnlnotification activities in the future. Page 249 From SMC Application re Supporting Docs, Application Status Section Completed? 1. Application Information Yes No 2. Project Information Yes No 3. Regulatory Requirements Yes No 4. Site Information Yes No 5. Facility Information ❑ Yes x No 6. Supporting Documentation ❑ Yes x No 7. Payment Information Yes No 8. Authorization Yes No 8551E (2017112) Page 37 of 38 Page 250 Suggested additions to motion for your consideration • That 79/15 retains the current public consultation requirements to hold at least two public meetings (may need to be virtual during the pandemic but should be live and recorded) • Require proponents to advertise in print media e.g. in local newspaper(s) at commencement of project, so that the impacted community aware of proposed changes and/or applications and approval process, and clearly post such notice prominently on their website. • Require proponent to post ALL project related documents, including application(s) and related studies on their website as they become available and before public meetings are held. Page 251 Thank you for your attention — Questions? Page 252 If this information is required in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1102 ext. 2097. The Regional Municipality of Durham Minutes Energy From Waste — Waste Management Advisory Committee Tuesday, September 28, 2021 A meeting of the Energy From Waste — Waste Management Advisory Committee was held on Tuesday, September 28, 2021 in Council Chambers, Regional Headquarters, 605 Rossland Road East, Whitby, at 7:00 PM. In accordance with Provincial legislation, electronic participation was permitted for this meeting. 1. Roll Call Present: G. Gordon, Whitby, Chair W. Basztyk, Brock V. Daram, Ajax S. Elhajjeh, Clarington R. Fleming, Pickering P. Haylock, Clarington, Vice -Chair K. Meydam, Clarington G. Rocoski, Oshawa J. Vinson, Clarington Absent: None Non -Voting Members Present: A. Burke, Senior Planner, Special Projects, Municipality of Clarington Councillor Jones, Local Councillor, Municipality of Clarington L. Kwan, Environmental Specialist, Covanta W. Marsden, Acting Facility Manager, Covanta Councillor Joe Neal, Regional Councillor D. San Juan, Environmental Health Specialist, Health Department, Durham Region Staff Present: G. Anello, Director of Waste Management Services R. Inacio, Systems Support Specialist — Information Technology L. Malyjasiak, Works Technician 3, Waste Services, Works Department A. Porteous, Supervisor of Waste Services S. Glover, Committee Clerk, Corporate Services — Legislative Services Page 253 Energy from Waste — Waste Management Advisory Committee Minutes September 28, 2021 Page 2 of 6 2. Declarations of Interest There were no declarations of interest. 3. Adoption of Minutes Moved by G. Rocoski, Seconded by G. Gordon, That the minutes of the EFW-WMAC meeting held on Tuesday, May 25, 2021, be adopted. CARRIED 5. Announcements There were no announcements. 6. Presentations There were no presentations. 7. Delegations There were no delegations. 8. Correspondence There were no correspondence items. 9. Administrative Matters A) EFW-WMAC Comments on Durham Region's Long -Term Waste Manaaement Plan (LTWMP) (2020-2040) A. Porteous provided an update regarding the status of the Long - Term Waste Management Plan (LTWMP). She advised that a draft plan, executive summary, and targets and actions summary was put together over the Summer. She further advised that Phase 2 of the plan opened on September 20, 2021 and that the deadline for public comments is October 25, 2021. A. Porteous advised that a virtual public open house is available at www.durhamwasteopenhouse. ca, and staff will be hosting a live town hall event scheduled for October 19, 2021. She advised that next steps will be to review the consultation feedback from the various committees, departments, stakeholders, and the public, make changes if needed, and then prepare a report and a presentation that will be presented to Regional Council in early 2022 for approval. G. Anello added that Committee members are also able to submit comments on an individual basis until October 25, 2021. Page 254 Energy from Waste — Waste Management Advisory Committee Minutes September 28, 2021 Page 3 of 6 Staff responded to questions regarding whether the LTWMP targets address the new blue box regulations; how the energy generated from Durham's waste will be used; the extended hours for waste operation facilities stated in the LTWMP; the potential use for landfill sites and converting them to greenspace; how the methane production on existing landfills in Durham Region is being captured/managed and whether it can be used for energy production; and how the increase of multi -residential buildings would affect the LTWMP targets. Discussion ensued regarding the innovation aspect of the LTWMP and what the Committee could work on independently to address concerns with waste diversion. G. Anello advised there are a number of problematic materials with respect to diversion such as polystyrene (expanded and rigid) and plastic film that need to be addressed. He advised that he will send the list of problematic materials to G. Gordon to review. B) EFW-WMAC Work Plan (2021-2022 G. Gordon reviewed the draft EFW-WMAC work plan with the Committee members. It was the consensus of the Committee that a special EFW-WMAC meeting be called in order to accept Committee comments on the LTWMP's Targets and Actions, and to approve the 2021-2022 EFW- WMAC Work Plan. 10. Other Business A) Update by Gioseph Anello, Director, Waste Management Services, the Regional Municipality of Durham, regarding Durham Region's Organics Manaaement Proiect G. Anello provided an update regarding Durham Region's Organics Management Project. G. Anello advised that the Request for Proposals (RFP) went out in August 2021 and will remain open until March 2022 to receive responses from the pre -qualified proponents. He further advised that staff will report back to Committee and Regional Council in June 2022 regarding the preferred proponent. Staff responded to questions from the Committee regarding whether mediation between the Region and the Municipality of Clarington is still ongoing; and who the three selected proponents for the organics management project are. Page 255 Energy from Waste — Waste Management Advisory Committee Minutes September 28, 2021 Page 4 of 6 B) Update by Gioseph Anello, Director, Waste Management Services, the Regional Municipality of Durham, regarding Extended Producer Responsibility G. Anello provided an update regarding Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). G. Anello advised that the Region will be transitioning the Blue Box in 2024 to EPR which will mean that producers will be responsible for organizing, collecting, processing, and marketing of the blue box materials . He advised that the Region has a deadline of this week to identify who is currently receiving Blue Box services through the Region. He further advised that the City of Toronto will be transitioning to EPR in 2023 and that staff will be monitoring that closely. C) Update by Gioseph Anello, Director, Waste Management Services, the Regional Municipality of Durham, regarding the Durham York Energy G. Anello provided an update regarding the Durham York Energy Centre (DYEC). G. Anello advised that the DYEC is currently undergoing its Fall scheduled maintenance and that both boilers will be down for about 10 days for cleaning and inspection. He advised that the DYEC has processed about 69,000 tonnes of garbage, recovered 1,700 tonnes of metals, and generated roughly 53,000 megawatts of electricity for sale to the grid for the first half of the year. He further advised that the boilers have been operating at about 90% availability. The high heat value of the waste has resulted in a by-pass of waste. He added that 9,000 tonnes of waste was sent to alternate disposal landfills for the first half of the year. G. Anello advised that the preliminary results of the Spring Source Stack Test are available and that the results were very good. He advised that there will be a report presented to Committee and Council in the near future. He highlighted the following results: • Dioxins and Furans measured 4.1 picograms for Boiler #1, and 7.4 picograms for Boiler #2 where the limit is 60 picograms per metre cubed • Total Suspended Particulate Matter measured 0.78 milligrams for Boiler #1, and 0.25 milligrams for Boiler #2 where the limit is 9 milligrams per cubic metre Page 256 Energy from Waste — Waste Management Advisory Committee Minutes September 28, 2021 Page 5 of 6 • Lead measured 0.44 micrograms for Boiler #1, and 0.32 micrograms for Boiler #2 micrograms where the limit is 50 micrograms per metre cubed • Mercury measured 0.086 micrograms for Boiler #1, and 0.081 micrograms for Boiler #2 where the limit is 15 micrograms per metre cubed G. Anello advised that Matt Nield, Plant Manager, Covanta retired at the end of August, and that William (Bill) Marsden will be his temporary replacement. He advised that the Chief Operating Officer of the DYEC will be Acting Plant Manager in B. Marsden's absence. He also advised that Amanda Huxter, Environmental Specialist, Covanta has retired and Lydia Kwan, Environmental Specialist, Covanta is her replacement. G. Anello advised that staff have a final draft for the streamlined Environmental Assessment that will be provided to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks for a final review. They have one month to review and if any comments are received, staff would make the appropriate changes and submit a final version to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks by the end of 2021. G. Anello responded to questions from the Committee regarding whether any Lakeridge Health facilities in Durham Region send their medical waste to incinerators; and an update regarding the emergency Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) amendment application. In response to a question from the Committee regarding which Committee the report regarding the Spring source stack test results would be considered at, G. Anello advised the report will be considered by the Works Committee and then Regional Council, but a copy of the report can be emailed to the EFW-WMAC Committee members for their information. 11. Next Meeting The next regularly scheduled meeting of the EFW-WMAC will be held on Tuesday, November 23, 2021 in Council Chambers, at 7:00 PM, Regional Headquarters, 605 Rossland Road East, Whitby. 12. Adjournment Moved by K. Meydam, Seconded by G. Gordon, That the meeting be adjourned. CARRIED Page 257 Energy from Waste — Waste Management Advisory Committee Minutes September 28, 2021 Page 6 of 6 The meeting adjourned at 8:32 PM. G. Gordon, Chair, Energy from Waste — Waste Management Advisory Committee S. Glover, Committee Clerk Page 258 Historic Downtown Bowmanville Business Centre (BIA) Board of Management Meeting Minutes Tuesday September 14, 2021; 6:30pm Virtual Meeting due to COVID-19 pandemic Present: Edgar Lucas, Chair Laura Holmes, Secretary Gerri Lucas, Treasurer Cathy Holmes Ron Hooper (joined at 7:05pm) Bonnie Wrightman, CBOT representative (departed at 7:OOpm) Absent: Justin Barry Erin Kemp Delegations Present: None The meeting was called to order by the Chair. 1. Presentation by Delegations The Chair recognized that no delegations were present. 2. Adoption of Minutes Moved by R. Hooper, seconded by L. Holmes THAT the minutes of the meeting of June 8, 2021 be approved as circulated. CARRIED 3. Business Arisine from Previous Minutes (a) Update from Mayor's COVID Task Force The Chair reported that there have been no recent meetings. (b) OBIAA Updates Councillor Hooper reported that the OBIAA convention is coming up and he may try to join virtually. Weekly meetings continue. Recent topics have included addressing homelessness in downtown areas and COVID recovery. (c) Traffic Services Parking Space Reassignment Update from March 2021 minutes. Mr. Potrykus verbally confirmed that spaces at 96 King St E and 84 King St W are to be removed and three new spaces will be created on Temperance St. Page 259 Historic Downtown Bowmanville 2 [date] Business Centre (BIA) 4. Correspondence Correspondence was received from i. Clerk's Department regarding parking in downtown; GG-378-21 & Bylaw 2021-053 (via email) ii. Legislative Services regarding CIP Amendment; PD-186-21 & 2021-055 & Notice of Adoption (via email) iii. Legislative Services regarding Notice of Adoption of Zoning; Notice Bylaw 2021-056 & 2021-056 (via email) iv. Planning Department regarding customer service focus groups; letter and link for distribution (via email) V. Planning Department regarding OPA & ZBA additional dwelling units; memo, notice of public meeting, & attachments (via email) vi. CAO office regarding Safe Restart Funding (via email) vii. Planning Department regarding subdivision rezoning; notice of public meeting SC-2021- 0003 (via email) Moved by R. Hooper, seconded by G. Lucas THAT the correspondence be received for information. THAT the link from 4.iv. be distributed to members. CARRIED 5. Treasurer's Report The Treasurer presented the following: i. $58143 BMO, $100000 Edward Jones ii. Safe Restart Funds have been distributed Moved by L. Holmes, seconded by C. Holmes THAT the Treasurer's Report be adopted as presented. CARRIED (b) Support staff may be required for duties this autumn leading into winter. Discussions will be ongoing. 6. Directors' Reports (a) Council Liaison — R. Hooper: Reported that he was in attendance at the 40t" Anniversary celebration of Cachet, and welcomed new business owners of Starbucks and The Little West Indies. The Chair asked if the street sweeper could be sent through town. (b) Events — C. Holmes: Page 260 Historic Downtown Bowmanville 3 [date] Business Centre (BIA) Reported that Applefest cancellation notices have been sent. Depending on restrictions there maybe opportunities to host smaller events such as Ladies Night. Sidewalk Sale was a huge success. Window wraps at BMO have been approved for fall, Christmas, and winter. (c) Membership Relations —J. Barry: No report. (d) Streetscape — G. Lucas: Reported that watering services were not required in June since flowers were delivered later than expected. When first frost hits the flower vendor will be contacted for removal. Lids for stationary planters need to be repaired/refitted before winter. Winter banners will be installed following Remembrance Day. Recommend that support staff paint the sign poles. Depending on public health restrictions there may be an opportunity to clean out the storage shed sometime this autumn. (e) Communications— (vacant): L. Holmes reported that important notices and information continues to be distributed to members by email. (f) Website & Social Media — L. Holmes: Reported that social media continues to show growth. Both Facebook and Instagram have well over 3000 followers. The social media giveaways have been very successful and recommend that they continue for rest of year. Business owners have expressed appreciation for the promotion on social media. Many non-BIA businesses have reached out about being promoted on the account which shows the value is being recognized. The website redevelopment is well underway. Storefront photos have been taken and will be submitted this week. Less than half of the businesses submitted their directory listing so the last few weeks have been spent reaching out and/or researching remaining businesses to complete the directory. There are approximately 165 listings right now, and new businesses that have just opened/are opening need to be added. Design proofs for the redevelopment should be available in the coming weeks. Project is on -track to be completed before end of year. (g) CBOT Updates— B. Wrightman: Digital Main Street 3.0 is active. CBOT received the grant to run the program. There are two digital service squad members to assist businesses apply for Digital Transformation Grants of $2500. Information will be sent with a request to circulate to BIA members. Rapid Test Kits are available from Ontario Chamber of Commerce through CBOT. Close to 20 000 kits have been distributed to approximately 140 businesses since May. Kits are for testing of employees. CBOT partnered with some Durham Region chambers to roll out a Shop Local campaign and received a grant of nearly $200 000. More details will be available soon. Page 261 Historic Downtown Bowmanville 4 [date] Business Centre (BIA) Vaccine Passport information is available through CBOT. "It's in the bag" campaign was very successful so there is a plan to do another leading into the holidays. 7. New Business (a) Blue Box Recycling Regulations Durham Region is negotiating a new contract for recycling collection. Preliminary information is that businesses in the BIA will no longer receive collection. Councillor Hooper will report back as this topic is scheduled to be discussed at Council. Discussion deferred. (b) Bowmanville Legion Use of Banner Poles The Chair was contacted by the Legion about use of the banner poles for Remembrance Day. Normally the Veteran banners would be installed following Applefest, but this year will be installed October 1" and removed following Remembrance Day. James Printing will remove summer banners during install. The Chair will confirm with Legion if any poles aside from King Street will be used. Support staff may be required to remove summer banners from side streets. (c) Light Pole Receptacles The Chair has contacted Operations about receptacles that are failing. These will need repaired before the holiday lights are installed. The Chair is also getting some information about more lights for the trees and some replacement stars. The Chair will report back next meeting. 8. Date of Next Meeting The next meeting of the Board of Management is scheduled to be held on Tuesday October 12, 2021 commencing at 6:30pm virtually. 9. Adiournment Moved by R. Hooper, seconded by G. Lucas THAT the meeting adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:58pm. CARRIED Page 262 GANARASKA REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS September 16, 2021 (via Zoom) GRCA 05/21 1. Welcome and Call to Order The Chair called the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) Board of Directors meeting to order at 7:15 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Jeff Lees, Chair - Municipality of Port Hope Mark Lovshin, Vice Chair - Township of Hamilton Nicole Beatty — Town of Cobourg Greg Booth - Township of Alnwick/Haldimand Brian Darling - Town of Cobourg Vicki Mink - Municipality of Port Hope Jo Neal — Municipality of Clarington Tracy Richardson - City of Kawartha Lakes Margaret Zwart - Municipality of Clarington ALSO PRESENT: Linda Laliberte, CAO/Secretary-Treasurer Cory Harris, Watershed Services Coordinator Ken Thajer, Planning and Regulations Coordinator Pam Tregunno, Conservation Lands Coordinator Ed Van Osch, Forest Recreation Technician Members of the Public ABSENT WITH REGRETS: ALSO ABSENT: Tim Belch - Township of Cavan Monaghan 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest None. 3. Minutes of Last Meeting GRCA 32/21 MOVED BY: Nicole Beatty SECONDED BY: Vicki Mink THAT the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority approve the minutes of the June 17, 2021 meeting. CARRIED. Page 263 Minutes GRCA Board of Directors 05/21 Page 2 4. Adoption of the Agenda GRCA 33/21 MOVED BY: Vicki Mink SECONDED BY: Mark Lovshin THAT the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority adopt the agenda. CARRIED. Joe Neal and Margaret Zwart excused themselves from the meeting to attend a closed session of Clarington council. 5. Delegations None 6. Presentations a) Clean Water -Healthy Land Stewardship Program 2021 Updates Staff presented an update of the 2021 Clean Water —Healthy Land Program. Updates were given on tree planting and the Trees for Rural Roads program. The presentation covered the funding for the Clean Water -Healthy Land Financial Assistance Program and the year to date success. Other initiatives were touched on such as the rain barrel sale, the Highway of Heroes Tree Campaign and the 2 Billion Tree Program Funding. Brian Darling asked for a copy of the presentation. GRCA 34/21 MOVED BY: SECONDED BY: Tracy Richardson Greg Booth THAT the Board of Directors receive the presentation for information. CARRIED. 7. Business Arising from Minutes None 8. Correspondence a) 07/21 Minister David Piccini, MECP re: Thank you GRCA 35/21 MOVED BY: Brian Darling SECONDED BY: Mark Lovshin THAT the Board of Directors receive the correspondence for note and file. CARRIED. 9. Applications under Ontario Regulation 168/06: Permits approved by Executive: Page 264 Minutes GRCA Board of Directors 05/21 Page 3 GRCA 36/21 MOVED BY: Brian Darling SECONDED BY: Greg Booth THAT the Board of Directors receive the permits for information. CARRIED. Permit Application requiring Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Board of Directors discussion: None 10. Committee Reports: a) Ganaraska Forest Recreation Users Committee — September 2, 2021 Tracy Richardson provided an overview of the meeting for the members of the Board. GRCA 37/21 MOVED BY: Mark Lovshin SECONDED BY: Vicki Mink THAT the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority direct staff to pursue municipal support for the appointment of GRCA Provincial Offences Officers with the powers to enforce municipal parking bylaws on GRCA owned lands. CARRIED. GRCA 38/21 MOVED BY: SECONDED BY: Greg Booth Tracy Richardson THAT the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority receive the Ganaraska Forest Recreational Users Committee minutes for information. CARRIED. 11. New Business: a) Updated Employment Policy GRCA 39/21 MOVED BY: Vicki Mink SECONDED BY: Brian Darling THAT the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority approve the updates to the Employment Policy dated September 16, 2021 effective immediately. CARRIED. b) Compensation Plan GRCA 40/21 MOVED BY: SECONDED BY: Nicole Beatty Vicki Mink Page 265 Minutes GRCA Board of Directors 05/21 Page 4 THAT the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority approve the plan to move forward with an update of the Compensation and Pay Equity Plans. CARRIED. c) 2021 Budget Criteria G RCA 41 /21 MOVED BY: SECONDED BY: Greg Booth Tracy Richardson THAT the Board of Directors direct staff to prepare the preliminary budget based on the criteria contained in the staff report dated September 16, 2021 and the preliminary budget be prepared for the October 21, 2021 meeting. CARRIED. 12. Other Business None. 13. In Camera None. 14. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. on a motion by Nicole Beatty. CHAIR CAO/SECRETARY-TREASURE R Page 266 Newcastle BIA MINUTES October 14, 2021 www. vi l lao,eof n ewcastle. ca Attendance: Janeen Calder, Tracey Yates, Marni Lewis, Jane Black, Councillor Marg Zwart, Theresa Vanhaverbeke, Valentine Lovekin Regrets: Greg Lewis, Adam Jeronimo, Helen Vatandoust, Granville Anderson 1. Meeting called to order at 9:OOa.m. 2. Approval of August Minutes Motion by: Theresa Vanhaverbeke Seconded by: Tracey Yates 3. Business Arising from Minutes: We decided against getting a BIA visa from the Municipality. Marni has paid for the annual web hosting renewal and was reimbursed for it. 4. President's Report - Does the BIA need a vaccine policy? It was agreed that the BIA will follow all mandated guidelines and standards set out by the Provincial and Regional Health Departments. 5. Treasurer's Report: The current bank balance is $72,930.39. When budgeting for 2022 we will set aside money for BIA promotion. 6. Council Report: There is an item in the Municipality's 2022 budget for Newcastle's Street scape Plan. 2 trees were planted/replaced in the downtown core The accessible parking spot will be in front of the Cenotaph for 2022. 7. Committee Reports: Safetv Et Decor: The Veterans banner were installed and were a different size than our Village of Newcastle banners so it took a little longer to install. Page 267 Advertising: Top Instagram posts: Newcastle Home Decor repost Thanksgiving Newcastle Physio repost We Made it repost Good Morning Newcastle Sunrise Baked at Sift Top Facebook posts: Happy Thanksgiving Farmers Market post Go Train repost Blush Bridal repost Newcastle Dairy closing Special Events: a) Town Hall Lighting - Council voted down the financial support for the lighting. They did confirm they would maintain the lights once hung. A motion to spend $6500.00 to purchase the lights from the Christmas Decor company that quoted them through the MOC. Motioned by: Theresa Vanhaverbeke Seconded by: Tracey Yates Janeen will reach out to set up a time to get the lights installed. b) Breakfast with Santa- not going ahead. c) Santa Parade - the committee would like to bring Santa and his sleigh to the Town Hall lighting to set up in the patio for families to walk by and see him. Just waiting for confirmation from the Hall Board. d) Harvest Festival - n/a e) Newcastle Story Walk - The Library has coordinated this family activity promoting reading and physical activity in the BIA. We have 16 businesses participating. Page 268 The Virtual Mayor's event is October 21 at 8:30am We are planning an in person Christmas Party, stay tuned for details. Rapid Testing kits are still available for businesses with less that 150 employees, please go to cbot.ca/rapidscreenina- for more information. 9. Chamber News: n/a 10. CIP: n/a 11. New Business: The BIA is selling the light pole Christmas wreaths for $25. They will be available to members first and then to the general public. Marni and Jane will coordinate. 12. Next meeting, Thursday, November 11 th, 9:OOam C Town Hall 13. Motion to adjourn meeting by Janeen Calder seconded by Marni Lewis Page 269 Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Joint Committees Date of Meeting: October 25, 2021 Report Number: PDS-054-21 Submitted By: Ryan Windle, Director of Planning and Development Services Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO By-law Number: File Number: PLN15.18 Resolution#: Report Subject: Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan Update Recommendation: 1. That Report PDS-054-21 be received for information. Page 270 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-054-21 Report Overview Page 2 The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the completion of an update to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for the Lower Trent Region, Ganaraska Region and Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority shoreline areas, review the findings and recommendations for Clarington, and outline proposed next steps for implementation of the Plan. 1. Background 1.1 In 1990, the Central Lake Ontario (CLOCA), Lower Trent Region (LTRCA) and Ganaraska Region (GRCA) Conservation Authorities completed a shoreline management plan for the Lake Ontario shoreline within their respective jurisdictions. The Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan (Sandwell Swan Wooster Inc., December 1990) provided shoreline management direction, including defining flood and erosion limits, identifying concentrations of natural hazards in conflict with existing development ("Damage Centres"), and identifying land use considerations. 1.2 In 2017, an update of this Plan was jointly initiated by the three Conservation Authorities, with funding support from the National Disaster Mitigation Program and the affected municipalities (locally from Durham Region), with the Municipality providing in - kind support. The update provided an opportunity to account for physical shoreline changes that have occurred since completion of the original Plan, changing lake conditions as a result of new water level planning, climate change forecasting, and technological advances that contribute to improved data collection and modelling. 1.3 The objective of the renewed Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan (Zuzek Inc., Nov. 2020) (Plan) is to provide updated information and mapping of coastal hazards and to increase the resilience of coastal communities by providing information and direction for mitigating risk. The conceptual management approaches recommended in the Plan include a hierarchy of four approaches: Avoid, Accommodate, Protect and Retreat. 1.4 The Plan area covers a shoreline length of approximately 135 kilometers from Ajax to Carrying Place (Quinte West), including the entirety of Clarington's Lake Ontario shoreline area (approximately 35 kilometers). It further sub -divides the Plan area into 12 reaches, delineated based on sediment transport, sediment deposition and physical barrier (e.g. headlands and jetties) information and observations. 1.5 A Notice of Study commencement was released for the project in October 2018. Staff from Planning & Development Services and Public Works participated in a Steering Committee of municipal, provincial, federal, and Conservation Authority staff, receiving information and presentations throughout the project and providing input. Staff attended Page 271 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report PDS-054-21 Council and Public Information Sessions held in November 2019 and provided comments on the Draft Plan released in June 2020. 1.6 The Plan contains information to assist the Conservation Authorities, municipalities, and shoreline property owners within the Plan area, including: • Shoreline photo inventories (2018 and 2019); • A breakdown of shoreline structure types presents along the shoreline and their current condition; • Updated flood, erosion and dynamic beach hazard limits and hazard maps; and • A reach -by -reach summary of conditions, threats, and recommendations. 1.7 The Plan defines hazards for the purposes of managing development along the shoreline to minimize / avoid future property damage and risk to life. It does not comment on or provide direction regarding the management of Lake Ontario outflows, as this is within the jurisdiction of the International Joint Commission. 1.8 The completed Plan and hazard mapping is available to the public on both the CLOCA website (https://www.cloca.com/lake-ontario-shoreline-hazard-manag) and GRCA website (https://www.grca.on.ca/programs-management/). An overall summary of the Plan is provided in CLOCA Board report SR5723-21. The Plan was endorsed by the CLOCA and GRCA Boards earlier this year. 2. Planning Policy Framework 2.1 The Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 (PPS) sets out the policy foundation for regulating the development and use of land in Ontario. Section 3.1 deals with the protection of public health and safety relating to natural hazards and requires that development be directed to areas outside of hazardous shoreline lands which are impacted by flooding, erosion and/or dynamic beach hazards. Section 3.1.2 of the PPS sets out specific prohibitions for development and site alteration in the dynamic beach hazard and areas where safe access cannot be maintained as a result of present natural hazards. In addition, Section 3.1.3 of the PPS requires that "Planning Authorities shall prepare for the impacts of a changing climate that may increase the risk associated with natural hazards." 2.2 A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan) provides a framework for implementation of the PPS in the region. In implementing the PPS, the Growth Plan requires that growth management planning direct development away from hazardous lands (Policy 2.2.1 e)). Page 272 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PDS-054-21 2.3 The Durham Region Official Plan (DROP) designates the majority of Clarington's shoreline as "Waterfront Areas." Lands in the "Waterfront Areas" designation are to be developed as people -places, except for significant natural areas, which are to be protected in their natural states. The DROP recognizes development areas adjacent to the shoreline in Newcastle, Wilmot Creek and Port Darlington east of Bowmanville Creek as designated Living Areas. Notwithstanding, environment policies contained in Section 2 conform with the policy direction set out by the PPS, prohibiting development and site alteration within the dynamic beach hazard and areas that would not have safe access appropriate for the nature of the development and the natural hazard. 2.4 The Clarington Official Plan generally designates Clarington's Lake Ontario shoreline reach Environmental Protection Area and Waterfront Greenway. Similar to the DROP, the Official Plan recognizes the development areas adjacent to the shoreline in Newcastle, Wilmot Creek and Port Darlington east of Bowmanville Creek, designating these areas Urban Residential. The predominant use of land in the Waterfront Greenway designation is recreation, tourism uses, conservation and agricultural uses. Within areas designated Environmental Protection, permitted development is limited to low -intensity recreation and uses related to forest, fish and wildlife management or erosion control and stormwater management. 2.5 Some properties along the edge of Lake Ontario are designated in the Official Plan as being within the Regulatory Shoreline Area. Policies of the Regulatory Shoreline Area do not permit the construction of new buildings or structures of any type. Further, if an existing dwelling is destroyed or demolished, reconstruction must commence within a 24 month period, after which reconstruction is not permitted 2.6 Implementation of the policies set out in the Official Plan is achieved through zoning by- laws. A comprehensive review of Clarington's zoning by-laws to implement the Official Plan is underway and includes the updating of regulations for development along Clarington's shoreline to be consistent with provincial natural hazard policies. It is important to note, however, that an existing building or structure which is lawfully in existence prior to the passing of the relevant zoning by-law and which does not conform to the Official Plan, but continues to be used for such purposes, shall be deemed legal non -conforming. I Summary of Findings for Clarington Shoreline Reaches 3.1 The Plan includes 21 hazard maps for the Clarington shoreline, which identify updated erosion, flood and dynamic beach hazard limits across the entirety of Clarington's shoreline area. The hazard maps applicable to Clarington are provided in Attachment 1. Page 273 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-054-21 Page 5 3.2 In general, the updated hazard mapping reflects a higher 100-year flood elevation of +76.01 m (IGLD85). In addition, the 100-year erosion rates for non -dynamic beach areas range from 0.17 to 0.59 m/year. For dynamic beaches, the 100-year erosion rates range from 0.11 to 0.25 m/year. 3.3 Existing buildings and structures are present within shoreline hazard limits in older development areas across Clarington, including in the Port Darlington, Wilmot Creek, and Bond Head areas, as well as along Lakeshore Road between Newcastle and Port Granby. The setback of new development from shoreline hazards can be seen in both the Lakebreeze and Port of Newcastle communities. The updated hazard mapping will change development limits across Clarington, generally increasing setbacks. 3.4 The Plan sub -divides Clarington's shoreline area amongst four reaches, as follows: • Reach 3 — Oshawa Harbour to St. Marys; • Reach 4 — St. Marys to Bowmanville Harbour; • Reach 5 — Port Darlington to Port of Newcastle; and • Reach 6 — Bond Head to Port Hope West Beach. 3.5 The summary of conditions and recommendations for each of these reaches is provided in Attachment 2. 3.6 Infrastructure (engineered and natural) threats identified along Clarington's shoreline include the following: • Inland migration of the barrier beach in Darlington Provincial Park; • Unprotected shoreline area at the end of the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station; • Poor structural condition of the west jetty at Bowmanville Creek; • Sediment transmission into the navigation channels at Bowmanville Creek and Graham Creek; • Flooding and/or erosion threat for existing development areas within hazard limits; and • Erosion threat, compounded by sediment deficit, for Port Darlington East Beach Park and Bond Head Park. 3.7 The Plan provides management recommendations for each reach, which will require both public and private landowner action to implement. The management recommendations for the reaches that capture Clarington's shoreline have been divided into four categories and are summarized in Table 1. Reach -specific recommendations are provided in Attachment 2. Page 274 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-054-21 Page 6 Table 1. Summary of Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan (Zuzek Inc., Nov. 2020) Recommendations for Clarington's Shoreline Reaches Category Summary of Recommendations Ecosystem - Maintain natural bluff environments and buffers - Continue dune restoration at Port Darlington West Beach Park Monitoring - Conduct routine monitoring of the existing shore protection at Darlington Nuclear Generating Station, St. Marys Cement and Wilmot Creek Retirement Community - Monitor the waterfront trail location relative to the eroding bluffs at the Port of Newcastle - Monitor bluff crest regression and slope stability along the Bond Head Bluffs and implement frequent hazard map updating Infrastructure - Structural upgrades to the west jetty at Bowmanville Creek and the jetties at Graham Creek - Development of sediment by-passing programs at Bowmanville Creek and Graham Creek to nourish eroding park areas to the east of these locations - Implementation of flood proofing measures for development on low lying lands within the hazard limit Land Use Planning - Avoid further development on hazardous lands - Consideration of community scale solutions for hazard protection or retreat for land subject to acute hazard risk 3.8 Climate change impacts are also assessed in the Plan and it is noted that warmer winters will cause a reduction in ice cover on Lake Ontario, with ice -free winters predicted by late century. Winter ice cover and shoreline ice accumulations in spring protect shoreline areas from wave impacts. Without ice protection, winter and spring wind events will drive waves into the shoreline and cause greater shoreline erosion. 4. Implementation 4.1 A collaboration of municipal, Conservation Authority, provincial and federal agencies, and shoreline property owners will be needed to meet the objectives of the Plan and implement strategies to mitigate risks. Page 275 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-054-21 4.2 Initiatives already completed or underway include: Page 7 • Adoption of the Clarington Flood Response Plan by Council in December 2017 and its incorporation into the Municipality of Clarington Emergency Plan; • Updating of natural hazard mapping by CLOCA and GRCA to reflect shoreline flood hazard, erosion hazard, and dynamic beach hazards as mapping in the Plan; • An Erosion Analysis and Report for the jetty at Bond Head Park to identify solutions to identify long-term strategies for beach nourishment and erosion prevention and conceptual design alternatives for repair of the jetty and beach area; • A comprehensive review of Clarington's zoning by-laws, which will implement shoreline natural hazard policies of the Clarington Official Plan, as amended by Official Plan Amendment 107, and updated natural hazard mapping; • Submission of correspondence by the Municipality to Fisheries and Oceans Canada — Small Craft Harbours, the federal agency responsible for piers on the east and west of the channel entrance at Bowmanville Creek, requesting they carry out the work identified by the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan (Attachment 3); • Initiation by CLOCA of a Lake Ontario Shoreline Hazard Summary, Risk Assessment and Management Plan to better understand and quantify the risks associated with the hazards where existing development has been identified within the shoreline hazard limits and to identify potential mitigation solutions to eliminate or reduce the risks; • Integration of relevant shoreline hazard management recommendations into the Clarington Corporate Climate Action Plan, supporting coordination of mitigation and resiliency planning for areas of Municipal authority; and • Development of flood risk assessment data and public communications strategy by the Region of Durham, in consultation with local municipalities and community stakeholders, to raise awareness across Durham Region about climate change related flood risks, improve flood preparedness. 4.3 The potential cost implications to address management recommendations for existing development within the shoreline hazard limits will be significant and requires support from local Conservation Authorities and other levels of government. The Municipality and the local Conservation Authorities continually explore funding options to contribute to addressing shoreline changes in the community. 4.4 The frequency for future updating the plan to reflect notable changes in natural hazard policy, Lake Ontario water level regulation, or physical changes to the shoreline will need to be further explored with the Conservation Authorities. In addition, Page 276 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-054-21 Page 8 implementation will need to consider roles and responsibilities for shoreline erosion monitoring. 4.5 To support the prioritization of actions that are the responsibility of the Municipality to implement from the updated Plan, the Planning & Development Services Department has budget allocated to undertake an update to the Municipality of Clarington Waterfront Study completed in 1993. This Study outlined the need for land acquisition and development of waterfront parks for the Courtice, Bowmanville and Newcastle urban centres. In particular it emphasized public access to the waterfront and was the basis for the Waterfront Trail linkages through Clarington. The recommendations of this Study have been largely implemented. Compiling data and background information gathering will continue through the fall, drafting and issuance of Terms of Reference for the engagement of consulting services to undertake the update study is anticipated early in 2022. 5. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Director of Public Works who concurs with the recommendation. 6. Conclusion 6.1 The updated Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan (Zuzek Inc., November 2020) provides updated hazard limits and management recommendations for the shoreline reaches within the Municipality. 6.2 The information contained in the Plan provides the Municipality with important information to address provincial land use planning policy requirements for shoreline areas. Beyond implementing the updated shoreline hazard mapping, the Municipality, the Region of Durham, GRCA and CLOCA have a number of initiatives underway or planned that will contribute to reducing coastal risks and increasing community resilience. 6.3 Implementation of the Plan will require resources and collaboration, both public and private. Where shoreline hazards pose a significant risk to human safety and property, collaboration with senior levels of government will be needed to implement strategies to mitigate the risk. Staff will continue to seek funding opportunities to support Municipal projects that will contribute to implementation of the Plan. Page 277 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-054-21 Page 9 Staff Contact: Amy Burke, Senior Planner, 905-623-3379 ext. 2423 or aburke@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan (2020) Hazard Maps — Clarington Attachment 2 — Summary of Conditions and Recommendation, Reach 3 — 6 (Clarington) Attachment 3 — Letter to Small Crafts and Harbours regarding West Jetty at Bowmanville Interested Parties: The following interested parties will be notified of Council's decision: Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Port Darlington Community Association St. Marys Cement Ontario Power Generation Page 278 Attachment 1 to Report PDS-054-21 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping` 100 Year Flood Level o The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year v Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 (+75.55 m CGVD2013) e"e.•'' Erosion Hazard Limit . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit Base Mapping_ Geographical Names o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) — Road Network Topographic Contours (2 m interval) CLOCA Administrative Boundary Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves For embayments, the standardized 15 m setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. 0 Stable Slope Allowance 0 0 The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverme erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may o0 regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a 00 barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Mana ement Plan � Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit g v and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 in. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. O 5� 1�0 additional details. N 2�� Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X W E I in Inset Map: © OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° Oxf aereae. zu m S.J.lAGa11 �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvwrek. sip 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of e, proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. 1r 'a 28 ss oi5Yars f 36 't37 < % Oshawa I1 ` %� �`� 3 34 35 3 r� •6 _ _« 36 sz ''. mr9 ` \ ���apa/� 31 3 Ers�alb f/f a� I Whitby ` �� ��f 18 19 t � zs"ta3eyzs 29 30 '1.. oaa�1 10 I I 12 13 ° �l 3 7 4 5 8 9 I mi 1 LAKE O N T A R I O 676800 677000 677200 677400 677600 677800 b '.O 9 a` 1 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the ,Central •s lk CentraLae Ontario Conservation h on Authority, ( f f CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue •s with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario 3T3 0 5 Page 279 CONSERVATION Phone: 411 Wbw �cccaeo./ 1 ! 1 1 i -1 k° MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca CLOCA Map 21 of 37 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Ma 100 Year Flood Level 0 o N In The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and 10 storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit Base Mapping; Geographical Names o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) — Road Network Topographic Contours (2 m interval) CLOCA Administrative Boundary Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o 0 0 Stable Slope Allowance oOo The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood c Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan v and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 m (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. O 5� l�� 2�� Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X w E I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° v rerEae. zu� m � S.J.IAGaa �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING oco� ONE WORLD tvwrdn sip Z�W This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. '\ 'r 2s ss 'r 135Y+r 4 % Oshawa zz ` i� !�� 3 34 3531 \. f/f z5raa39/Fz \.. Whitby ` �✓ � ✓� 18 19 r 29 30 oa✓�� 10 11 12 13 ° �l •�� 5 8 9 4 o r raj 1 LAKE O N T A R I O Reach M O b O\ h 00 V 677800 678000 678200 678400 678600 678800 b :.O 9 a` 11 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the :\ Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, ty d&- Central CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue t\ with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario 3T3 0 5 Page 280 C O N S E R V A T I O N Phon41 Web ewww.clooa cold 1 -1 kno MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca CLOCA Map 22 of 37 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Ma 100 Year Flood Level 0 o N In The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and 10 storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit Base Mapping; Geographical Names o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) — Road Network Topographic Contours (2 m interval) CLOCA Administrative Boundary Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o 0 0 Stable Slope Allowance oOo The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent `r to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood c Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan v and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 m (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. O 5� l�� 2�� Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X w E I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° v rerEae. zu� m � S.J.IAGaa �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING oco� ONE WORLD tvwrdn sip Z�W This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. '\ 'r 2s ss 'r 135Y+r 4 % Oshawa zz ` i� ��� 3 34 3531 \. '`1so' �.. S`GI6 f/f a� I Wh flay ` �n; ✓� 18 19 t sz5~ 1 �y 29 30 •\ oa✓�� 10 11 12 13 ° �l •�� 5 8 9 4 No \0 2 o r mi 1 LAKE O N T A R I O Reach M O b O\ h 00 V 678800 679000 679200 679400 679600 679800 b :.O 9 a` 11 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the :\ Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, ty d&- Central CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue t\ with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario 3T3 0 5 Page 281 C O N S E R V A T I O N Phon41 Web ewww.clooa cold 1 -1 kno MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca CLOCA Map 23 of 37 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Ma 100 Year Flood Level 0 o N In The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and 10 storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit Base Mapping; Geographical Names o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) — Road Network Topographic Contours (2 m interval) CLOCA Administrative Boundary Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o 0 0 Stable Slope Allowance oOo The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood c Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan v and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 m (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. 0 50 1�0 20� Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X w E I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° v rerEae. zu� m � S.J.IAGaa �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING oco� ONE WORLD tvwrdn sip Z�W This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. 2s ss '3 'r ni5Ya3 ` % , s36 \37 a : Oshawa 11 ` ��� 3 34 35 t 3 31 tt a� I Whitby 5� 18 19 t .r 1e ass 29 30 '1.. 10 11 12 13 ° �l 4 o t� ^� 1 LAKE O N T A R I O Reach M O b O� h 00 V 679800 680000 680200 680400 680600 680800 b :.O 9 a` 11 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the :t Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, ty d&- Central CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue tt with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario 3T3 0 5 Page 282 C O N S E R V A T I O N Phon41 Web ewww.clooa cold 1 -1 kno MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca CLOCA Map 24 of 37 680800 681000 681200 681400 681600 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and stone surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the Base Mapping; steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Geographical Names Stable Slope Allowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year — Road Network erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from Topographic Contours (2 m interval) the toe of the bank or bluff. r - CLOCA Administrative BOUriClary The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. 0 0 v DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract O 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. ID Note: There are local variations along the reaches h 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor � Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X N O 50 100 2�� W E I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° Oxf rerEae. zu m S.J.IAGatI �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvWrck. ill 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty, of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. <\yam as Whitby l �! 3 Ajax .�.�� 4 5 y :s ss 13` i Oshawa 22 aa� II 12 13 L A K E O N T A R I O Reach remmel 0 0 10 v 680800 681000 681200 681400 681600 b :.O a` 9 �1 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the :t Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authotity, off Central CLOCA I00 Whiting avenue tt with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario 3T3 0 5 Page 283 CONSERVATION Phon411 Wbe_,Ioc9aeo MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca 0 0 0 v 0 0 v CLOCA Map 25 of 37 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit Base Mapping; Geographical Names o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) — Road Network Topographic Contours (2 m interval) CLOCA Administrative Boundary Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave o effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. o 10 For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Stable Slope Allowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. O 5� l�� 2�� Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X W E I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° Oxf rerEae. zu m S.J.IAGaa �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvWrck. ill 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty, of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. -_ '\ 28 ss r Y+rs ni5 S36\37 < % Oshawa \ u ��� 3 3431 35 \ E �iSS�alb f/f a� I Whitby ` ✓! 18 19 t 39yz5 29 30 6 14 3 7 10 11 12 13 4 5 8 9 Pl 1 LAKE O N T A R I O Reach M 0 0 O O 00 01 h 7 0 0 10 v 681800 682000 682200 682400 682600 682800 4` 9 �1 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the :\ Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authotity, off Central CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue tt with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario 3T3 0 5 Page 284 C O N S E R V A T I O N Phone: 411 Webwww. �occaeowj 1 ! 1 1 i -1 err MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca CLOCA Map 26 of 37 O 0 0 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit Base Mapping; Geographical Names o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) — Road Network Topographic Contours (2 m interval) CLOCA Administrative Boundary Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave o effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. o For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Stable Slope Allowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence - Ontario. additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. O 5� l�� 2�� Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X W E I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° Oxf rerEae. zu m S.J.IAGaa �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvWrck. ill 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty, of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. -_ '\ 28 ss r Y+rs ni5 S36\37 < % Oshawa \ u ��� 3 3431 35 \ E �iSS�alb f/f a� I Whitby ` ✓! 18 19 t 39yz5 29 30 6 14 3 7 10 II 12 13 y\— 4 5 8 9 — Pl 1 LAKE O N T A R I O Reach M 0 0 O O 00 01 h 7 0 0 v 682800 683000 683200 683400 683600 683800 4` 9 �1 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the :\ Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authotity, off Central CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue tt with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario 3T3 0 5 Page 285 CONSERVATION Phone: 411 Wbw �occaeowj 1 ! 1 1 i -1 err MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca CLOCA Map 27 of 37 0 0 10 0 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and stonn surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the Base Mapping; steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Geographical Names Stable Slope Allowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year — Road Network erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from Topographic Contours (2 m interval) the toe of the bank or bluff. r - CLOCA Administrative BOUriClary The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: 0 o0 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Datums: Datum Conversion: Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) 10 00 Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 7 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X N O 5� l�� 2�� W E I Im Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° Oxf rerEae. zu m S.J.IAGatI �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvwrrk. sip 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty, of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. <\yam ar Whitby l �! 3 Ajax 4 5 y :s ss 13` i Oshawa 22 aa� II 12 13 ^�' Ia L A K E O N T A R I O Reach remmel 0 0 683800 684000 684200 684400 684600 b :.O a` 9 �1 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the :t Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authotity, off Central CLOCA Whi Io0 Whiting avenue tt with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario 3T3 0 5 Page 286 CONSERVATION Phon411 Wbe_,Ioc9aeo MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca 0 O m 7 0 v CLOCA Map 28 of 37 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: 0 0 Hazard Mapping 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and stone surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff o The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the C:1 Base Mapping; steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Geographical Names Stable Slope Allowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year — Road Network erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from Topographic Contours (2 m interval) the toe of the bank or bluff. r - CLOCA Administrative BOUriClary The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit 0 The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood o Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. O 5� l�� 2�� Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X w E o I i i I I I i i Ira Inset Map: © OpenSacctMap contributors S o0 V PREPARED BY: •"` °°° Oxf rerEae. zu m S.J.lAGa11 �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvwrrk. sip 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty, of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. 0 N 0 00 '1 : 2e 55 ; 5Y o1^rs / ` 't37 4 % Oshawa 22 �/ ��� 3 34 35 36 3 y� 1 ar _ _ / as/� 3 ,t � �a ��SS�albre tit a� I Whitby ` �. 5f 18 ` 19 t 29y 25 29 30 ars"a"� Ib 28 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 t nr yV' 15 6 14 2i 7 10 13 II 12 _ _ yyl LS �b� O 3 4 5 8 9 '2�_a., ei111 P1 y�9 o 'try 2 mi 1 LAKE O N T A R I O .t 0 5 t �-1km 684800 685000 685200 685400 685600 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the /, Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, (f Ce n t ra l CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario L I H 3T3 Phone: 905-579-0411 Page 287 CONSERVATION Web: www.cloca.com/ MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca 0 10 v 0 O W V 0 N 0 c CLOCA Map 29 of 37 0 N Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and stonn surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the o Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. � Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the Base Mapping; steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Geographical Names Stable Slope Allowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year — Road Network erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from Topographic Contours (2 m interval) the toe of the bank or bluff. r - CLOCA Administrative BOUriClary The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized is by c shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and subject to review o the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor C Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. N 10 Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. 0 50 100 200 Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X W E I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° Oxf rerEae. zu m S.J.lAGa11 �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvwr4sip Z�W 0 0 c This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither b (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability rb beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty, of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. Louroce r 2 '\ 28 ss ni5Y^rs \ ` `' 36 •\37 < % Oshawa 22 ` j� !f�31 3 34 35 \ 'ee43 3\ E `2S" Wh [by ` 5f 18 ` 19 t 39y 25 29 30 aa ars"a"� � F \ 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 \' nr yV' Ib •% \y(t•� IS ' oa2� a 6 IQ 4.1 7 10 II 12 13 3 4 5 8 9 y�y mi 1 LAKE O N T A R I O •\ 0 5 �-1 km 685800 686000 686200 686400 686600 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, r& Central CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue with support from Durham Region. Web: www.cloce.,amyLake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario L I H 3T3 Page 288 CONSERVATION Phone: 905-579-0411 MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca 000 m v O V 0 0 c b V CLOCA Map 30 of 37 0 N N Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and stonn surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the o Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the Base Mapping; steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Geographical Names Stable Slope Allowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year — Road Network erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from Topographic Contours (2 m interval) the toe of the bank or bluff. r - CLOCA Administrative BOUriClary The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized is byLo c shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and subject to review the Conservation Authority. 10 INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit v The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor C Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. 0 50 100 200 V Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X W I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° Oxf aereae. zu m S.J.lAGa11 �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvwr4sip Z�W 0 0 v This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty, of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. Louroce 3 2 '\ 28 ss ni5Ya3c \ ` `' _ 36 '\37 < % Oshawa 2231 12 �_ sF E 2S" a� I Wh [by 5� 18 ` 19 t ' s.,ta3ey2s 2 36 \ `aa 28 F \ - ^ / 17 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 \' AV' b IS _ �a014 8. 6 2i 7 10 II 12 13 3 4 5 8 9 mi 1 LAKE O N T A R I O .\ 0 5 686000 686200 686400 686600 686800 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, off Central CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario L I H 3T3 Page 289 CONSERVATION Web: Phone: 905-579-0411 www.cloca.com/ MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca O V 0 0 c b V CLOCA Map 31 of 37 0 N M 14 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and stonn surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the o Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. 10 Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the Base Mapping; steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Geographical Names Stable Slope Allowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year — Road Network erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from Topographic Contours (2 m interval) the toe of the bank or bluff. r - CLOCA Administrative BOUriClary The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, c localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by N the Conservation Authority. 10 v INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches o 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. b N N 10 Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. 0 5� l�� 20� ` ` 00 V Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X W E I Im Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° Oxf rerEae. zu m S.J.lAGa11 �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvwr4sip Z�W 0 0 c This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability o0 7 beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty, of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. Louroce 2 '\ 28 ss r 135Y^rs < % Oshawa ` �/� 32 34 35 \ 22 %\ E 2S31 a� I Wh [by ` 5f 18 ` 19 t 3ey 26 2` 30 1 `aa ars"a"� ° 1 F \ - ^ / 17 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 2] 28\' nr yV' Ib •� J pa�2 �.6 14 IS 2i 7 10 II 12 13 3 4 5 8 9 �2ei111 P1 y�9 mi 1 LAKE O N T A R I O •\ 0 5 �-1 km 686400 686600 686800 687000 687200 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, off Central CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario L I H 3T3 Phone: 905-579-0411 Page 290 CONSERVATION Web: www.cloca.com/ MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca 0 10 00 0 b b v CLOCA Map 32 of 37 0 0 00 N 00 7 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping_ 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). Flood Hazard Limit Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit Base Mapping; 11 Geographical Names O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) — Road Network Topographic Contours (2 in interval) CLOCA Administrative Boundary Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Stable Slope Allowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. Erosion Hazard Limit 0 v The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year C`1 erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. 0 0 DATA SOURCES: N 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Datums: Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. Datum Conversion: IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 m (average) 10 Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X O 50 I00 N 2�� w E I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: , e e� QQpFEBalpy� s P v9®� At" aw TT � O f+ETERJ. ZII>EN o V L IOD189144 O 11 Satu. ° Zuzek inc. ° ENGINEERINGN Of ONE WORLD t1, 20 Z1 This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. ro I ®� u •-r. '� r, 4isYsr6 Oaf 4 6 Oshawa - I/� 3 34 35 131 Whitby r i o to ,y m; I J J 22 23 24 25 26 2] 28 .rlr�hl FJ .1 a � cry 687000 687200 687400 687600 687800 0 11 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the �i `l Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, off Central CLOCA 00 Whiting Avenue L A K E O N T A R I O .1 with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario 3T3 0 5 MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Page 291 C O N S E R V A T I O N 411 Web ewww. Rocca com/ 1 -1 km Revised April 2021 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca 0 0 ao N 00 7 0 v v CLOCA Map 33 of 37 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and stonn surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the Base Mapping; steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Geographical Names Stable Slope Allowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year — Road Network erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from Topographic Contours (2 m interval) the toe of the bank or bluff. r - CLOCA Administrative BOUriClary The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence - Ontario. additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. O 5� l�� 2�� Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X W ` ` E I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° Oxf rerEae. zu m S.J.IAGatI �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvwrrk. sip 7A 0 0 0 N v O O V b c This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither o (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability N beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty, of any kind, either expressed or N to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. R <\yam as Whitby �08 l �! 3 Ajax .�.�� 4 5 y 2s ss ss Oshawa —fQ1e II 12 13 ^�' Ia L A K E O N T A R I O Reach 688000 688200 688400 688600 688800 b :.O 9 a` �1 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the :t Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authotity, off Central CLOCA I00 Whiting avenue tt with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario 3T3 0 5 Page 292 CONSERVATION Phon411 Wbe_,Ioc9aeo MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca 0 010 0 N v 0 N N 10 It CLOCA Map 34 of 37 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and stonn surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the Base Mapping; steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Geographical Names Stable Slope Allowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year — Road Network erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from Topographic Contours (2 m interval) the toe of the bank or bluff. r - CLOCA Administrative BOUriClary The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence - Ontario. additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. O 5� l�� 2�� Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X W ` ` E I i i I I I i i Ira Inset Map: © OpenSacctMap contributors S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° Oxf rerEae. zu m S.J.IAGatI �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvwrrk. sip 7A 0 0 v 0 0 0 M v 0 N v O 0 10 N 7 This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither o (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty, of any kind, either expressed or 10 to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. <\yam as Whitby l �! 3 Ajax .�.�� 4 5 y 2s ss ss Oshawa —fQ1e II 12 13 ^�' Ia L A K E O N T A R I O Reach 689000 689200 689400 689600 689800 b :.O 9 a` �1 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the :t Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authotity, off Central CLOCA I00 Whiting avenue tt with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario 3T3 0 5 Page 293 CONSERVATION Phon411 Wbe_,Ioc9aeo MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca 0 0 v O 0 sD 10 7 0 7 7 CLOCA Map 35 of37 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and c stone surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded r� 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 �`°...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the Base Mapping; steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. Geographical Names Stable Slope Allowance 0 o The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent 10 O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. v • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year — Road Network erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from Topographic Contours (2 m interval) the toe of the bank or bluff. r - CLOCA Administrative BOUriClary The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may O regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a o0 Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan M and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. O 5� l�� 2�� Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X W E I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S O O W PREPARED BY: i r�'{•r��pp \O 'IT rerrae. zu� m � S.J.lAGa11 �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. o o ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvwrdn sip Z�W This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. 28 ss '` / i 435Y13b cl 4 % DShdWd 22 ` � !6� 3 34 3531 \ 00 :t E ��1S�a16 f/f a� I Wh [by ` 5f 18 ` 19 t 39>•f25 29 30 `aa ars"a"� 28 � F \ Ib 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 t nr yV' 15 •� Jpa�2 �. <a ion 2 t. 6 14 2i 7 10 13 II 12 _ _ yyl LS �b� O 3 4 5 8 9 '2�_a., ei111 P1 y�9 o 'try 2 mi 1 LAKE O N T A R I O •t 0 5 t �-1km 690000 690200 690400 690600 690800 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, off Central CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario L I H 3T3 Phone: 905-579-0411 Page 294 CONSERVATION Web: www.cloca.com/ MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca 0 v M O O M 10 co CLOCA Map 36 of 37 Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapin 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and CD stone surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded M 100 Year Flood Level during any year of 1 % (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for CLOCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 e"•...•'' Erosion Hazard Limit (+75.55 in CGVD2013). . N❖` Flood Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Toe of Bluff The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the Base Mapping; steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. 0 Geographical Names Stable SlopeAllowance The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) Erosion Hazard Limit The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year — Road Network erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from Topographic Contours (2 m interval) the toe of the bank or bluff. r - CLOCA Administrative BOUriClary The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Shoreline Management Plan. The hazard limits are not the official Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. Local conditions may O regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the require a modified mapping approach if the beach is eroding and/or a c N Conservation Authority for additional details on the regulatory limit barrier beach. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan and implications for new development. report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2018 Orthophotography provided by © First Base Solutions Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.46 to (average) Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 2018 Digital Terrain Model provided by © First Base Solutions 0.46 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches 2016 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. within CLOCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMPfor Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. O 5� 1�� 2�� Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X W E I Ira Inset Map: ©OpenStreetMap contributors S O O O M PREPARED BY: •"`^°p° rerrae. zu� m � S.J.lAGa11 �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. o ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tvwrdn sip Z�W This map was published March 2020 for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (CLOCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic CLOCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability beach areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty, of any kind, either expressed or to the hazardous lands should contact CLOCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. N 2e 55 ; 135Ya36 •\ ` `Cq < % DShdWd j� !� 3 34 35 36 37 21 31 41aE 1S"16 f/f a� I Wh[by ` 5f 18 ` 19 t 39>•f26 29 30 `aa s"a"� 28 F \ /ar20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 \' nr yV' Ib 115 •� Jpa�2 �. <a ion 2 \. 6 14 2i 7 10 13 II 12 _ _ yyl LS �b� O 3 4 5 8 9 '2�_a., ei111 P1 y�9 mi 1 LAKE O N T A R I O •\ 0 5 �-1 km 691000 691200 691400 691600 691800 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, off Central CLOCA 100 Whiting Avenue with support from Durham Region. Lake Ontario Oshawa, Ontario L I H 3T3 Phone: 905-579-0411 Page 295 CONSERVATION Web: www.cloca.com/ MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 Durham Region 605 Rossland Road East Whitby, Ontario LIN 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 Toll -Free: 1-800-372-1102 Web: www.durham.ca C> 0 N 00 v O O O M 10 CLOCA Map 37 of 37 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level O The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and C> 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or 10 exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 In setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the O steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dvnamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood oc Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is M eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate 1 3 Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline I a Management Plan report for additional details DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 W Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° At WX r+araae. zu m S.J.IAGaR 100189144 2, Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD tv\,c.r4si, ZGW This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. 11 is 1s '•t 1 n - .. - � 14 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 45 6 7 8 a Reach 7 L A K E O N T A R I O O N M b V O GRCA O — j East Boundar � 42 Reach 5 0 5 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 691200 691400 691600 691800 692000 Page 296 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 rr��J PortonHope, Ontario LlA3V8 i1 4a Phe:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION web: www.grca.on.ca C> M 0 M 7 GRCA Map 1 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level o The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and ov 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 c Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 to setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. c O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dvnamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood o Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is M eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline v Management Plan report for additional details DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 W Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w $ At WX Is" PEraad. zu m S.J.lAGM7 100189144 2, Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD aw.r4n sip ZdG This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. -T � �rA��'i r_,..� i e as i�\ sa.e� 39 40 41 34 35 36 37 38 28 30 31 32 33 y, Ho723 / V 19 --,W U 17 ^•t 14 �— 9 10 11 12 13 2 3 4'S 6 7 LAKE 0NTARI0 O O N M v Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 692200 692400 692600 692800 693000 Page 297 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION Web: www.grca.on.ca GRCA Map 2 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level O The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and ov 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 v Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 to setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. c o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) O M `10 Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dvnamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood o Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is c eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 W Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w $ At WX \s" PEraad. zu m S.J.lAGM7 100189144 2, Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING V`caocofi ONE WORLD aw.r4n sip ZdG This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. 43 _-____ 38 39 40 4142 36 28 29 30 31 32 33 'S 2G 27 24 19 '•t16 17 23 4 °"f•'% 1 '2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LAKE 0NTARI0 O O N M v Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 693200 693400 693600 693800 694000 Page 298 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION Web: www.grca.on.ca GRCA Map 3 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level O The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and ov 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 v Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 to setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. c o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) M Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dvnamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood o Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 W Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w $ At WX Is" PEraad. zu m S.J.lAGM7 100189144 2, Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD aw.r4n sip ZdG This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. -T � �rA��'i r_,..� i e as ie\ sa.e� 39 40 41 34 35 36 37 38 29 30 31 32 33 H°e 28 /2423 _ 19 U - .. 16 17 14 11 12 13 — d --'�° LAKE 0NTARI0 O O N M v Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 694200 694400 694600 694800 695000 Page 299 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario L lA 3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION Web: www.grca.on.ca 0 M v GRCA Map 4 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level o The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and w 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or M exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and upmsh. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 In setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the g y p g o steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. � o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) 10 Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood c Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is M eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M W E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w $ At WX Is" PEraad. zu m S.J.lAGM7 100189144 2, JL:o Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD aw.r4sip ZdG This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. - �rs9% i ^ _,..� E as 43 42 39 40 41 ]4 35 36 37 38 \4s 29 30 31 32 33 y, — 25 26 Ho7 / V 23 19 --,W U 16 17 ^•t 14 �— 2 9 10 11 12 13 1 3 45 6 7 8 LAKE 0NTARI0 O N M W Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 695200 695400 695600 695800 696000 Page 300 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario L lA 3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION Web: www.grca.on.ca CD M O N M W 0 0 0 M 7 GRCA Map 5 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level O The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and oho 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or 10 00 exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 to setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the O steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. CD O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dvnamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood o0 Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is M eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate 1 3 Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline I v Management Plan report for additional details DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence - Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 W Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w $ At WX Is" PEraad. zu m S.J.lAGM7 100189144 2, Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD aw.r4n sip ZdG This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. -T I'sr A v`t `Yr-...� M tE- Bo i�\ sa.e� 39 40 41 '4 / 14 35 36 37 38 29 30 31 32 33 28 y, Ho7 / V -__ C-'x ,�• ,.� _ ...,e ' 20 21 22 23 W 19 ,W U m t 7 newca xx• _ ."�.. 10 17 ^•t 14 9 10 11 12 2 3 4 5\ 6 7 8 _ d LAKE 0NTARI0 O N M b V Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 696200 696400 696600 696800 697000 Page 301 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION Web: www.grca.on.ca 0 M 7 GRCA Map 6 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level O The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and °Oo ov 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 tr Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 In setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the o steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood o0 Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence - Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 W Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w $ At WX Is" PEraad. zu m S.J.lAGM7 100189144 2, Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD aw.r4n sip ZdG This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. -T I" �rS,^;��—i �°, � ^ r_,..� "" t e �.as i�\ sa.e� 39 40 41 '4 / �]4 35 36 37 A� Se9 s:oR 29 30 31 32 3 27 3 t' / °` 28 y, 25 =6 H / V -__ C-'x ,�• ,.� _ ...,e ' 20 21 22 23 is m t 7 newca xx• _ ."�.. 10 17 ^•t la - 9 10 11 12 13 �� 1 2 3 4 5\ 6 7 LAKE 0NTARI0 O O N M b v V Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 697200 697400 697600 697800 698000 Page 302 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION Web: www.grca.on.ca co M10 7 O O N M b v 0 0 0 M 7 GRCA Map 7 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: 0 c Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 m setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping: o Toe of Bluff °O n GCOgYaphlCal Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. DATA SOURCES: 2019 Orthophotography and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Tannin Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. 0 0 Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit `M° The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood v Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details Datum Conversion: IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 m (average) To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N 0 50 100 200 0 I IM w E M S W 7 Datums: Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. Vertical: CGVD2013, metres PREPARED BY: •"` °°° At r+eraae. zu m S.J.IAGaR �� 100189144 2, VLEERINGZuzek inc. ° ° ocofi ONE WORLD TV\10- do sip 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Ganmaska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or o hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. o N M lC G RCA 7 t E B u'dar 14 35 36 37 3g !� mil• }�>. \\s � ve9 ss��p _ oR 29 30 31 32 33 'y • `' _�� �' 23 25 26 H2 7 ram, `23 1 20 21 22 1, � 17 14 " 7 g 9 10 11 12 13 "� a L A K E 0 N T A R I 0 Reach 5 0 5 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 698200 698400 698600 698800 699000 Page 303 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario L lA 3V8 t1r4J a Phone: (905) 885-8173 CONSERVATION web: www.grea.on.ca 0 0 tr 0 0 M O O M GRCA Map 8 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and w 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or c exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 In setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) o Stable Slope Allowance o • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate o0 Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 W Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° At r+araae. zu m S.J.lAGa11 �� 100189144 2, VLEERINGZuzek inc. ° ° ocofi ONE WORLD TV\z)- do sip 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. t •tom — • 7 newca+ � •t 1 2 3 45 6 7 $ „9 Hwa o� 20 21 22 19 4 IS 15... r 17 14 13 ' 29 30 31 32 33 3• oR oe 2H 2G eo7 24 75 23 L A K E O N T A R I O O O M 7 j East B... dar 0 0 as � az � 0 5 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 699200 699400 699600 699800 700000 Page 304 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 rr���� Port Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 CONSERVATION Phone: (905) 885-8173 Web: www.grca.on.ca 0 v 0 v 0 oMo 0 v M GRCA Map 9 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and ov 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or o exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 In setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) o Stable Slope Allowance e • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate c Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline r°O Management Plan report for additional details. oOo v DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 W Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w At PEraad. ZU R o S.J.lAGM7 �� 100189144 2, VLEERINGZuzek inc. ° ° ocofi ONE WORLD TV\z)-A� sip 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. 43 34 p oR 29 30 31 32 33 y- Ho7 /1420 23 - 19� U 17 �hd LAKE ONTARIO O O 10 b 7 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 700200 700400 700600 700800 701000 Page 305 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION Web: www.grca.on.ca 0 v 10 O O 10 b V GRCA Map 10 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*-V Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 to setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, o localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review o00 by the Conservation Authority. v Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotography and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence - Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M W E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w $ At Is" PEraad. zu m S.J.lAGM7 �� 100189144 2, VLEERINGZuzek inc. ° ° ocofi ONE WORLD TV\z)-A� sip 7A M 9 0 This map was published March 2020 for the Ganazaska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither o (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or °p hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. t / _43 i�\ sa.e� 39 40 4142 34 35 36 37 38 30 31 32 33 27 16 / 2423 t7 lJ 11 20 21 22 .A—� U c4•• � _—�� _ I __� I I P.. t•`7 newca '� IS 1� 17 S 14 ry « 9 10 11 12 13 -�° L A K E 0 N T A R I 0 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 701200 701400 701600 701800 702000 Page 306 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION Web: www.grca.on.ca b M10 0 c b V GRCA Map 11 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*-V Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 to setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, o localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review C:1 by the Conservation Authority. v Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotography and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence - Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M W E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w $ At Is" PEraad. zu m S.J.lAGM7 �� 100189144 2, VLEERINGZuzek inc. ° ° ocofi ONE WORLD TV\z)-A� sip 7A 13 b V 0 This map was published March 2020 for the Ganazaska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither o (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability M areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. t / _43 i�\ sa.e� 39 40 4142 34 35 36 37 38 30 31 32 33 y, H2 723 22 / V 19 --,W— U n..... - ... 16 17 ^•t � la ,- �- 9 10 It 12 13 2 3 4 'S \ 6 7 8 _ - a - V L A K E O N T A R I O Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 702200 702400 702600 702800 703000 Page 307 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION Web: www.grca.on.ca 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 C:1 v 10 b V GRCA Map 12 of 43 Ganaraska Re LEGEND: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level »•° Flood Hazard Limit 1*-V Erosion Hazard Limit F7 Dynamic Beach Setback ion Conservation Authority (GRCA) DEFINITIONS: 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an o allowance for wave runup and upmsh. For the exposed shoreline, wave a effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 to setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract ID O 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and 0.42 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches O I Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for eo V Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. additional details. N Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 W E Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w $ At Is" PEraad. zu m S.J.lAGM7 �� 100189144 2, VLEERINGZuzek inc. ° ° ocofi ONE WORLD TV\z)-A� sip 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. t / _43 i�\ sa.e� 39 40 4142 34 35 36 37 38 30 31 32 33 �• / °` 28 y, H2 723 22 / V 19 --,W— U 17 ^•t 14 11 12 13 2 3 4 'S \ 6 7 8 — d --'�° LAKE 0NTARI0 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 703200 703400 703600 703800 704000 Page 308 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 rr��J PoHope,Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 i1 4a Phe:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION Web: www.grca.on.ca 0 V O 00 10 v GRCA Map 13 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an o Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and °O v waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 to setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff F1 Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year o0 erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. D INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Datums: Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. Datum Conversion: IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. additional details. N Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 W E Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w $ At Is" PEraad. zu m S.J.lAGM7 �� 100189144 2, VLEERINGZuzek inc. ° ° ocofi ONE WORLD TV\z)-A� sip 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. — S^l 9%'ir.Least 43 42 i�\ sa.e� 39 40 41 34 35 36 37 38 30 31 32 33 �• / °` 28 y, H2 7 � -no /23 V 22 02, 19 U mP t,7 newcxni _ - .. �.. 1(i 17 / LAKE 0NTARI0 a Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 704200 704400 704600 704800 705000 Page 309 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION Web: www.grca.on.ca 0 0 h 0 v O N v GRCA Map 14 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: o Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and v 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and upmsh. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 in setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff o0 Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the slo beach to the gently ping g v� steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. O Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. DATA SOURCES: 2019 Orthophotography and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. 0 Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit N The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the., he Flood Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details. Datum Conversion: IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 m (average) To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. Note: There are local variations along the reaches within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N 0 50 100 200 I Im W E c S � W V Datums: Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. Vertical: CGVD2013, metres PREPARED BY: •"` °°° v r+eraae. zu� m � S.J.IAGaR �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD TV\10- do sip 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Ganmaska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. o 00 GRCA r E Boundar � JJe•�`1�..``.. 5 �sa.e�� _ _-____ _38 41 7 �za 39 40 34 35 36 37 29 30 31 32 33 ^R}j t ve 28 ` Ho7 24 25 26 20 21 22 23 19 17 -' LAKE 0NTARI0 Reach 5 0 5 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 705200 705400 705600 705800 706000 Page 310 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION web: www.grea.on.ca 0 0 N c 0 v 7 GRCA Map 15 of 43 Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA) LEGEND: DEFINITIONS: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and o0 100 Year Flood Level storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Flood Hazard Limit Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 »•° (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). 1*vo Erosion Hazard Limit Flood Hazard Limit The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an F7 Dynamic Beach Setback allowance for wave runup and uprush. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 to setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dvnamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline v Management Plan report for additional details DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M W E S O O N h PREPARED BY: •"` °°° w $ At Is" PEraad. zu m S.J.lAGM7 �� 100189144 Zuzek inc. ° ° ENGINEERING ocofi ONE WORLD aw.arJn sip ZdG This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. t rrs'�i T Reach 5 East ®®®®®®®® Reach 8 m 11—® Reach 7 706200 706400 706600 706800 707000 O O N 10 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the o Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. GRCA Main Office GRCA Map LAKE O N T A R I O 2216 County Road 28 Port Hope, Ontario L lA 3 V 8 0 5 Page 311 Ganaraska PPhhobne:(905)885-8173 16 of 43 MAP PUBLISHED MARCH 2O20 CONSERVATION 1'r ca.orica Ganaraska Re LEGEND: Hazard Mapping; 100 Year Flood Level »•° Flood Hazard Limit 1*-V Erosion Hazard Limit F7 Dynamic Beach Setback ion Conservation Authority (GRCA) DEFINITIONS: 100 Year Flood Level The 100 Year Combined Flood Level considers both static lake level and storm surge, having a combined probability of being equalled or exceeded during any year of 1% (i.e., probability, P=0.01). The 100 Year Combined Flood Level elevation for GRCA is +76.01 in IGLD85 (+75.55 in to+75.60 in CGVD2013). o Flood Hazard Limit °O v The Flood Hazard Limit is defined as the 100-Year Flood Level plus an allowance for wave runup and upmsh. For the exposed shoreline, wave effects are calculated based on localized nearshore conditions and waves. For embayments, the standardized 15 to setback is applied. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan for additional details. Base Mapping Toe of Bluff n Geographical Names The Toe of Bluff is the transition from the gently sloping beach to the steep portion of the bank or bluff slope. o Dynamic Beach (Start Pt) Stable Slope Allowance • Dynamic Beach (End Pt) The Stable Slope Allowance is defined as a horizontal setback equivalent to 3.0 times the height of the bank or bluff. o0 — Road Network Erosion Hazard Limit `O GRCA Administrative Boundary The landward extent of the Erosion Hazard is the sum of the 100 year erosion rate plus the Stable Slope Allowance, measured horizontally from the toe of the bank or bluff. INTERPRETATION OF THE HAZARD MAPS: The hazard maps were prepared to support the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan. Wetland and riverine floodplains are not included on these hazard maps. The Dynamic Beach Setback is the onshore limit of the shaded pink polygon. The offshore limit in the lake highlights the linkages between overall beach stability and health, nearshore sediment resources, and longshore sediment transport. The hazard limit(s) are not the official regulatory limits of the Conservation Authority. Please contact the Conservation Authority for details on the regulatory limit and implications for any proposed work. The Erosion Hazard Limit is not mapped in sheltered waters, however, localized shoreline/riverine erosion may occur and is subject to review by the Conservation Authority. Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit The Dynamic Beach Hazard Limit is defined as the sum of the Flood Hazard plus 30 metres measured horizontally. If the dynamic beach is eroding, an additional erosion allowance is included and a separate Erosion Hazard Limit is not shown. Refer to the Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan report for additional details. DATA SOURCES: Datums: Datum Conversion: 2019 Orthophotogaphy and Digital Surface Model (DSM) provided by the Ministry of Natural Horizontal: UTM 17N NAD1983, metres. IGLD 1985 - CGVD2013 = 0.42 on (average) Resources and Forestry Vertical: CGVD2013, metres To convert from IGLD85 to CGVD2013, subtract 0.42 m. 2016-2017 LiDAR Digital Terrain Model obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Note: There are local variations along the reaches Forestry. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence — Ontario. within GRCA. Refer to the Lake Ontario SMP for additional details. N Geographical Names obtained from Natural Resources Canada Road Network File, 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-500-X 0 50 100 200 W Inset Map: C OpenStreetMap contributors M E S PREPARED BY: •"` °°° At r+araae. zu m S.J.IAGaR �� 100189144 2, VLEERINGZuzek inc. ° ° ocofi ONE WORLD TV\z)- do sip 7A This map was published March 2020 for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this map. However, neither (GRCA). The mapping of hazardous lands, including erosion, flooding, and dynamic beach GRCA, Zuzek Inc., SJL Engineering, or any other affiliated party assume any liability areas, is subject to change. The proponent of a proposed development on or adjacent to the arising from its use. This map is provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or hazardous lands should contact GRCA to discuss permit requirements. implied. l'�► - — -- �4y y ve9„',n °` 28 29 30 31 32 33 t 21 23 _ 27 19 1 yg111 U t• 7 ...... - 1617 15 14 1 2 3 45 \ 6 7 8 d LAKE 0NTARI0 0 0 7 O 0 j East Bo..d — 43 42 O N u 0 5 Mapping prepared by Zuzek Inc. for the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. 707200 707400 707600 707800 708000 Page 312 GRCA Main Office 2216 County Road 28 r�� Port Hope, Ontario LlA3V8 t1r4J a Phone:(905)885-8173 CONSERVATION web: www.grea.on.ca 0 0 N 00 7 O CD10 GRCA Map 17 of 43 Attachment 2 to Report PDS-054-21 Reach 3 — Oshawa Harbour to St. Mary's ` �B• _'�x� . Y'• .'ram^ • i k. '4 x• eC f � 20 1 Local Conditions • Reach Length = approximately 11 km. • The Port of Oshawa and St. Mary's loading facility represent the boundaries of a sub - littoral cell. • The McLaughlin Bay Wildlife Reserve, Second Marsh Wildlife Area, and Darlington Provincial Park represent a significant natural heritage corridor in Reach 3. • The three natural areas feature extensive coastal wetlands. • The Darlington Nuclear Generating Station is also a significant development and covers approximately two kilometres of shoreline in Reach 3. • There is no residential development along the shoreline in Reach 3 and a small amount of agricultural land. Natural Beach & Embryo Dunes at Darlington Shore Protection fronting Darlington Nuclear Prov. Park. Power Plant •f T} 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.l Shoreline Management Plan Page 313 Shoreline Structures • Reach 3 is 28% armoured, 72% natural. • Armoured portions of shoreline are limited to shoreline immediately east of Oshawa Harbour, and the shoreline fronting Darlington Nuclear Power Plant and St. Mary's Cement Plant. • Shoreline protection throughout the reach is generally well engineered armour stone revetments in moderate to good condition. • Shoreline protection fronting St. Mary's is ad -hoc in places and should be monitored and maintained as required. • Tolerance for additional shoreline armouring (low/medium/high): 000 • Sample statistics (for armoured portion of shoreline): Structure Type (Reath 3) Structure Condition (Reach 3) i� 49% 51% ■ Revetment ■ Seawall ■ Failed ❑ Jetty ❑ Poor O Groyne ❑ Moderate — 0 Headland ❑ Good ■ Breakwater ■ Excellent 0 Other 0 Unknown Sediment Supply and Longshore Sediment Transport • Longshore sediment transport potential is very low (0 to 5,000 m3/year) west of Darlington Provincial Park, with nearly equal eastward and westward components. • Longshore sediment transport potential east of Darlington Provincial Park is very high, with the net transport potential being upwards of 100,000 m3/year from west to east. Actual transport is however likely less than 10% of the potential due to the limited sediment supply, which is predominantly from eroding bluffs between the Provincial Park and Nuclear Power Plant. • A significant shoal offshore of Darlington Provincial Park likely creates a depositional area in its lee (i.e. Darlington Beach). • The Nuclear Power Plant and St. Mary's Cement Plant both present partial obstructions to longshore transport, however this effect is likely secondary to the small amount of 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.2 Shoreline Management Plan Page 314 actual sediment availability and transport through the reach, as is evident by the lack of significant fillet beaches on the west side of these landmarks. y, c • • QQ 10M ■ West Transport Potential ❑ East Transport Potential Q Wave Climate Output Location 111111 km Summary of Natural Hazards • 100-year Erosion Rate (Stable Slope not included): Start End 100-year Erosion Rate Bluff Crest or (lat, long) (lat, long) (m/year) Waterline 43.8649,-78.8209 43.8686,-78.8185 0.25 Bluff Crest 43.8691,-78.7793 43.87,-78.7376 0.25 Bluff Crest 43.8672,-78.7169 43.8738, -78.7 0.25 Bluff Crest 43.8749,-78.6951 43.8725,-78.6863 0.25 Bluff Crest • 100-year Flood Level and Flood Hazard Limit (including wave uprush): Start End 100-year Flood Level Flood Hazard (lat, long) (lat, long) (m IGLD85') (m IGLD85') 43.8648,-78.8209 43.8684,-78.8187 +76.01 +77.88 43.8684,-78.8187 43.8684,-78.7762 +76.01 +77.64 43.8684,-78.7762 43.8749,-78.6952 +76.01 +77.74 43.8749,-78.6952 43.8782,-78.6843 +76.01 +77.83 • Dynamic Beach(es): Start End 100-year Erosion Rate Dynamic Beach Name (lat, long) (lat, long) (m/year) or Stable 43.8686,-78.8185 43.8696,-78.8131 0.25 Oshawa East Beach 43.8696,-78.8131 43.869,-78.8038 0.73 McLaughlin Bay Barrier Beach A 43.869,-78.8038 43.868,-78.7999 0.25 McLaughlin Bay Beach 43.868,-78.7999 43.8693,-78.7867 0.73 McLaughlin Bay Barrier Beach B 43.8693,-78.7867 43.8691,-78.7793 0.25 Port Darlington PP Beach 43.87,-78.7376 43.8694,-78.7318 0.25 Port Darlington Power Plant Fillet Beach 43.8738, -78.7 43.8749,-78.6951 Stable St. Mary's West Fillet Beach 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.3 Shoreline Management Plan Page 315 • Wave climate —1 km offshore (output location W3): ARI (years) Depth (m) Hs (m) DIR (deg) Tp (s) 5 12.4 4.55 213 9.0 10 12.4 4.85 211 9.5 25 12.4 5.03 211 9.5 50 12.4 5.20 209 10.0 100 12.4 5.27 209 10.0 Infrastructure and Ecosystem Threats • Barrier beach in Provincial Park (McLaughlin Bay) is actively migrating inland. • Nuclear Plant: unprotected shoreline at east end of the plant will require shore protection. Shoreline Management Recommendations • Maintain natural bluff environments and buffers. • Monitor existing shoreline protection at the Nuclear Plant. • Monitor shore protection at St. Mary's Plant. Use Disclaimer The information in this reach summary was prepared for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, and the Lower Trent Region Conservation Authority. If used by a third party, they agree that the information is subject to change without notice. Zuzek Inc. and SJL Engineering Inc. assume no responsibility for the consequences of such use or changes in the information. Under no circumstance will Zuzek Inc. or SJL Engineering Inc. be liable for direct, indirect, special, or incidental damages resulting from, arising out of, or in connection with the use of the information in this summary by a third party. 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.4 Shoreline Management Plan Page 316 Reach 4 — St. Mary's to Bowmanville Harbour wit TZ , it REACH 4 Local Conditions • Reach Length = approximately 2.5 km. • St. Mary's to Bowmanville Harbour is a small littoral sub -cell in the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority jurisdiction. • The Cedar Crest Beach Road community in the western half of the Reach features lakefront properties constructed on the sand spit that separated the lake from the marsh. The buildings are close to the lake and vulnerable to coastal flooding. • The St. Mary's quarry is located inland of Cedar Crest Beach. St. Mary's Pier is located at the west end of the sub -cell and features land reclamation and pier infrastructure protruding approximately 600 m into Lake Ontario from the historical shoreline location. • The eastern half of the reach features Port Darlington West Barrier Beach, with Bowmanville Marsh in lee. The homes along the beach are setback approximately 50 m from the lake and less vulnerable to coastal hazards than the western half of the reach. The east end of the beach is public, accessible by boardwalks which were constructed to protect the native dune grasses and beach material. • Two armour stone jetties stabilize the navigation channel for the outlet of Bowmanville Creek and have been trapping sand on the west side since at least the early 1950s. Cedar Crest Beach Blvd. during Record High Fillet Beach and Jetties at Port Darlington Water Levels (May 2019) (November 2018) i► 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.1 Shoreline Management Plan Page 317 Shoreline Structures • Reach 4 is 57% armoured, 43% natural. • The east facing shoreline of St. Mary's land is armoured with an ad -hoc rubble revetment. This protection may require upgrades to prevent erosion and should be monitored. • The shoreline fronting Cedar Crest Beach Road is almost entirely armoured and features a wide variety of structure types, levels of design and condition. All structures have a very low crest due to the low land elevation and suffer from settlement during periods of high lake levels due to ongoing vertical erosion of the lakebed. • The west jetty at Bowmanville Creek is in extremely poor condition and requires significant repairs and/or upgrades. The structure has limited ability to trap sand or to dissipate wave energy due to its porosity and low crest. The structure roundhead which features a navigation light is in good condition. • Tolerance for additional shoreline armouring (low/medium/high): 000 • Sample statistics (for armoured portion of shoreline): ■ Revetmer ■ Seawall ❑ Jetty ❑ Groyne 0 Headland ■ Breakwater ❑ Other Structure Type (Reach 4) 2%_ 1% ■ Failed ❑ Poor ❑ Moder ❑ Good ■ Excellent ■ Unknown Structure Condition (Reach 4) 2% Sediment Supply and Longshore Sediment Transport • Longshore sediment transport potential is generally very low in Reach 4 with sediment moving in both directions depending on wave conditions, away from the centre of the reach. • Deposition occurs at the west end of the reach against the St. Mary's lands, and at the east end of the reach in the form of a fillet beach against the Bowmanville Creek west jetty. 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.2 Shoreline Management Plan Page 318 • The majority of the reach is a barrier beach complex that protects a marsh in its lee. The natural migration of the barrier has been altered through residential development and shore protection. DerlA / ■ West Transport Potential ❑ East Transport Potential Q Wave Climate Output Location Summary of Natural Hazards • 100-year Erosion Rate (Stable Slope not included): Start End 100-year Erosion Rate Bluff Crest or (lat, long) (lat, long) (m/year) Waterline 43.8725,-78.6863 43.8781,-78.6843 0.25 Bluff Crest 43.8793,-78.6826 43.8805,-78.681 0.33 Bluff Crest • 100-year Flood Level and Flood Hazard Limit (including wave uprush): Start End 100-year Flood Level Flood Hazard (lat, long) (lat, long) (m IGLD85') (m IGLD85') 43.8782,-78.6843 43.8857,-78.6750 +76.01 +77.74 43.8857,-78.6750 43.8878,-78.6648 +76.01 +77.64 • Dynamic Beach(es): Start End 100-year Erosion Rate Dynamic Beach Name (lat, long) (lat, long) (m/year) or Stable 43.8781,-78.6843 43.8793,-78.6826 Stable St. Mary's East Fillet Beach 43.8805,-78.681 43.8857,-78.6748 0.22 Cedar Crest Beach Rd. 43.8857,-78.6748 43.8873, -78.67 0.22 Cove Road 43.8873, -78.67 43.8877,-78.6648 Stable Port Darlington West Fillet Beach • Wave climate —1 km offshore (output location W4): ARI (years) Depth (m) Hs (m) DIR (deg) Tp (s) 5 14.1 3.01 206 9.0 10 14.1 3.28 204 9.5 25 14.1 3.51 203 9.5 50 14.1 3.84 201 10.0 100 14.1 4.06 201 10.0 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.3 Shoreline Management Plan Page 319 Infrastructure and Ecosystem Threats • Flooding and erosion threats for existing development along Cedar Crest Beach Road. • West jetty at Bowmanville Creek requires a significant structural upgrade. Shoreline Management Recommendations Cedar Crest Beach Road and West Beach Road: • Long-term incremental voluntary land disposition program required for the lands subject to acute risks due to lack of safe access during the 100-year flood and the location of development on a low-lying eroding dynamic barrier beach. • Short- and medium -term management options include continuing to facilitate private shore protection works by individual or, preferably, community scale beach nourishment and shore protection; road reprofiling. • West Jetty at Bowmanville Creek: structure requires upgrade to eliminate wave and sediment transmission into the navigation channel. Dune restoration to eliminate aeolian transport into the channel from the west fillet beach. • Sediment dredged from the navigation channel and fillet beach could be hydraulically bypassed to nourish the Port Darlington East Beach Park. Use Disclaimer The information in this reach summary was prepared for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, and the Lower Trent Region Conservation Authority. If used by a third party, they agree that the information is subject to change without notice. Zuzek Inc. and SJL Engineering Inc. assume no responsibility for the consequences of such use or changes in the information. Under no circumstance will Zuzek Inc. or SJL Engineering Inc. be liable for direct, indirect, special, or incidental damages resulting from, arising out of, or in connection with the use of the information in this summary by a third party. 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.4 Shoreline Management Plan Page 320 Reach 5 — Port Darlington to Port of Newcastle a. f kill Local Conditions • Reach Length = approximately 7.1 km. • The jettied entrances to Port Darlington the Port of Newcastle define a littoral sub -cell along the north shore of Lake Ontario. • The boundary between the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority is in the centre of Reach 5. • Significant sedimentation is ongoing in the navigation channel in Port Darlington. • Two new residential developments are under construction along the eroding bluff shoreline east and west of Lambs Road. • The Wilmont Creek Community stretches along almost 3 km of the eroding bluffs. • The Port of Newcastle community is located west of the jettied rivermouth. Eroding Bluffs and Failed Shore Protection Cobble Fillet Beach and Jetties at Port of East ofPort Darlington Newcastle 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.l Shoreline Management Plan Page 321 Shoreline Structures • Reach 5 is 25% armoured, 75% natural. • The west end of the reach features well engineered and recently constructed shore protection fronting Port Darlington East Beach. This structure is robust and in excellent condition. • Immediately east of Port Darlington East Beach there are a number of properties sitting atop a high, rapidly eroding bluff. Some properties feature shore protection of varying quality and condition, while others are unprotected and continue to erode. These properties are at high risk due to their proximity to the bluff crust. • The majority of shore protection within the reach is found in along the shores of Wilmot Creek, a retirement community that spans the border between the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority and the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority. This structure has been engineered and implemented in the last decade, however it is only an interim, porous structure comprised of an armour stone berm resting directly on the beach at the toe of the bluff. Some vertical beach erosion and horizontal recession of the bluff is expected to continue behind the structure during periods of extreme lake levels. • The jetties at Graham Creek (Port of Newcastle) are composite gravity structures and are both in moderate condition. The root of both structures is comprised of native fill material with a thin layer of minimal rock protection. These areas have suffered significant damage during the high-water periods in 2017 and 2019 and have nearly breached, particularly on the east side at Bond Head Parkette. These structures should be repaired and upgraded to prevent the propagation of waves and sediment into Graham Creek. • Tolerance for additional shoreline armouring (low/medium/high): 000 • Sample statistics (for armoured portion of shoreline): Structure Type (Reach 5) Structure Condition (Reach 5) 3% ■ Reve4 ■ Seam ❑ Jetty ❑ Groyne ❑ Headland * Breakwater o Other Z Good • Excellent • Unknown 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.2 Shoreline Management Plan Page 322 Sediment Supply and Longshore Sediment Transport • Net longshore sediment transport potential is from west to east through reach 5 with a potential volume of 80,000 to 100,000 m3/year. The actual transport is likely less than 10,000 m3/year as the supply of sediment is predominantly limited to local bluff erosion within the reach. • Deposition occurs primarily in the fillet beach to the west of the Graham Creek jetties, as is evident by the significant offset in shoreline position from the west side to the east (— 140 m). • Some deposition occurs at the west end of the cell at Port Darlington East Beach during periods of wave action from the southeast quadrant. • The significant amount of hardened shoreline fronting the Wilmot Creek Retirement Community reduces the sediment supply to the reach, however the structure is reasonably low crested and porous and therefore does not completely mitigate the bluff erosion that contributes sediment to the region. • Foitof NewGastle ro is ■ West Transport Potential ■ East Transport Potential Wave Climate Output Location 1 Summary of Natural Hazards • 100-year Erosion Rate (Stable Slope not included): Start End 100-year Erosion Rate Bluff Crest or (lat, long) (lat, long) (m/year) Waterline 43.8891,-78.663 43.8976,-78.6203 0.24 Bluff Crest 43.8976,-78.6203 43.8959,-78.5975 0.24 Bluff Crest 43.8962,-78.5947 43.8953,-78.5815 0.24 Bluff Crest • 100-year Flood Level and Flood Hazard Limit (including wave uprush): Start End 100-year Flood Level Flood Hazard (lat, long) (lat, long) (m IGLD85') (m IGLD85') 43.8885,-78.6624 43.8895,-78.6617 +76.01 +77.64 43.8895,-78.6617 43.8967,-78.6257 +76.01 +77.77 43.8967,-78.6257 43.8956,-78.5767 +76.01 +77.77 • Dynamic Beach(es): 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.3 Shoreline Management Plan Page 323 Start End 100-year Erosion Rate Dynamic Beach Name (lat, long) (lat, long) (m/year) or Stable 43.8885,-78.6641 43.8891,-78.663 Stable Port Darlington East Park 43.8959,-78.5975 43.8962,-78.5947 0.11 Wilmot Creek Barrier Beach 43.8953,-78.5815 43.8955,-78.5764 Stable Newcastle Beach • Wave climate —1 km offshore (output location W5): ARI (years) Depth (m) Hs (m) DIR (deg) Tp (s) 5 13.1 4.72 211 9.5 10 13.1 4.82 211 9.5 25 13.1 5.02 208 10.0 50 13.1 5.08 208 10.0 100 13.1 5.13 208 10.0 Infrastructure and Ecosystem Threats • West jetty at Bowmanville Creek requires a significant structural upgrade to mitigate wave and sediment transmission into the navigation channel (reported in Reach 4). • Port Darlington East Beach suffers from a sediment deficit. • Residences atop bluff east of Port Darlington East Beach are threatened by erosion. • Wilmot Creek: interim shore protection that only provides partial erosion mitigation. • Jetties at Graham Creek require significant repairs/upgrades to their roots to mitigate wave and sediment transmission into Graham Creek. • Jetties at the Graham Creek trap longshore sediment transport and starve the downdrift shoreline to the east (Bond Head). Shoreline Management Recommendations • Impacts of additional shoreline armouring: moderate impacts within Reach 5 but significant negative impacts to Reach 6 to the east. • West jetty at Bowmanville Creek requires significant structural upgrade to mitigate wave and sediment transmission into the navigation channel. • Implement a sediment bypassing program from the Port Darlington west fillet beach to nourish Port Darlington East Beach Park. • A long-term community scale solution is required for Port Darlington East Beach community to reduce erosion and flood hazards, such as protection or retreat. For example, a long-term voluntary land acquisition program for lands subject to acute hazards could be implemented to return the shore lands to public open space. • Maintain naturally eroding bluff environments. • Wilmot Creek Development: monitor shore protection and upgrade structures as required to provide the necessary protection. • Monitor trail location at Newcastle and relocate inland when threatened by erosion. • No further development in the floodplain west of Graham Creek (Port of Newcastle). • Root of jetties at Graham Creek require significant repairs/upgrades. • Implement a sediment bypassing program for the west fillet beach at Port of Newcastle to nourish the eroding east beach (Bond Head Parkette, Boulton Street). 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.4 Shoreline Management Plan Page 324 Use Disclaimer The information in this reach summary was prepared for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, and the Lower Trent Region Conservation Authority. If used by a third party, they agree that the information is subject to change without notice. Zuzek Inc. and SJL Engineering Inc. assume no responsibility for the consequences of such use or changes in the information. Under no circumstance will Zuzek Inc. or SJL Engineering Inc. be liable for direct, indirect, special, or incidental damages resulting from, arising out of, or in connection with the use of the information in this summary by a third party. 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.5 Shoreline Management Plan Page 325 Reach 6 — Bond Head to Port Hope West Beach rid H 1rn • 1 ` kin Local Conditions • Reach Length = approximately 23.4 km. • This long reach stretches from the Port of Newcastle to Port Hope West Beach. • East of the Port of Newcastle, the Bond Head bluffs and gullies dominate the shoreline. • The central portion of the reach features large tracks of agricultural land and small shoreline communities, such as Port Granby and Port Britain. • The Ontario Power Generation Wesleyville Storage is located 8 km west of Port Hope. • Port Hope west beach is a large deposition sink for the sand and gravel transported west to each in this reach. • Immediately west of West Beach, the railway into Port Hope runs right along the bluff crest and will soon require shoreline protection to stabilize the slope. Eroding Bluffs at Bond Head Port Hope West Beach and Jetties Quc •tom _ 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.1 Shoreline Management Plan Page 326 Shoreline Structures • Reach 6 is 7% armoured, 93% natural. • The jetties at Graham Creek at the west end of the reach are in poor condition at their root, where the structures were close to breaching during record high lake levels in 2019. • There is a significant offset in shoreline position from the west side of Graham Creek (Reach 5) to the east side, where the Bond Head Parkette and properties along Boulton street have suffered significant erosion due to a lack of sediment supply. The Parkette and neighbouring properties have all been hardened to some degree to mitigate ongoing erosion. These structures are mostly well engineered and in good condition, with a few exceptions. • Lakeshore Road is protected by an engineered armour stone revetment and is in generally good condition. • The high bluff shoreline from Bond Head to Port Britain, a distance of over 17 km, is entirely natural and unprotected. • Many private properties at Port Britain feature mostly ad -hoc shore protection. This protection is generally in poor to moderate condition and may require upgrades. • Tolerance for additional shoreline armouring (low/medium/high): 000 • Sample statistics (for armoured portion of shoreline): 2� ■ Revetmi ■ Seawall ❑Jetty 0 Groyne ■ Headland ■ Breakwater ■ Other Structure Type (Reach 6) Failed * Poor LIMode bit Good • Excellent • Unknown Structure Condition (Reach 6) Sediment Supply and Longshore Sediment Transport • Longshore sediment transport potential is very low in the embayment at the west end of the reach (Boulton Street), with very little sediment entering this region from either direction. 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.2 Shoreline Management Plan Page 327 • Net longshore sediment transport potential from Bond Head to Port Hope is from west to east with net potential transport volumes in excess of 100,000 m3/year at several locations. • A significant percentage of this transport potential is likely realized, perhaps up to 50% and particularly during high lake levels, due to the significant length of unprotected eroding bluff that contributes sediment to the reach and the nearshore lakebed which is comprised primarily of sand and cobble. • Deposition occurs primarily at the Port Hope west fillet beach to the west of Port Hope Harbour jetties, as is evident by the significant offset in shoreline position from the west side of the harbour to the east (over 300 m). VO •e w ' NenvcasOe .. • ® West Transport Potential ❑ East Transport Potential KUA aWage Climate Lemtput Location kill Summary of Natural Hazards • 100-year Erosion Rate (Stable Slope not included): Start End 100-year Erosion Rate Bluff Crest or (lat, long) flat, long) (m/year) Waterline 43.8956,-78.5759 43.8965,-78.4836 0.59 Bluff Crest 43.8965,-78.4836 43.9033,-78.4591 0.17 Bluff Crest 43.9033,-78.4591 43.9134,-78.4132 0.41 Bluff Crest 43.9134,-78.4132 43.9166,-78.408 0.29 Waterline 43.9202,-78.3955 43.9229,-78.3889 0.29 Waterline 43.9229,-78.3889 43.9282,-78.3803 0.2 Bluff Crest 43.9308,-78.3605 43.936,-78.3355 0.2 Bluff Crest 43.936,-78.3355 43.9372,-78.3337 0.29 Waterline 43.9384,-78.3286 43.9409,-78.3019 0.2 Bluff Crest • 100-year Flood Level and Flood Hazard Limit (including wave uprush): Start End 100-year Flood Level Flood Hazard (lat, long) (lat, long) (m IGLD85') (m IGLD85') 43.8965,-78.5766 43.8973,-78.5718 +76.01 +77.67 43.8973,-78.5718 43.8958,-78.5656 +76.01 +77.77 43.8958,-78.5656 43.8961,-78.5567 +76.01 +77.85 43.8961,-78.5567 43.9045,-78.4563 +76.01 +77.77 43.9045,-78.4563 43.9335,-78.3393 +76.01 +77.77 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.3 Shoreline Management Plan Page 328 43.9335,-78.3393 43.9406,-78.3032 +76.01 +77.86 43.9406,-78.3032 43.9408,-78.2913 +76.01 +77.77 • Dynamic Beach(es): Start End 100-year Erosion Rate Dynamic Beach Name (lat, long) (lat, long) (m/year) or Stable 43.9166,-78.408 43.918,-78.4046 0.2 Wesleyville Beach 43.918,-78.4046 43.9191,-78.4003 0.29 Wesleyville Beach 43.9191,-78.4003 43.9195,-78.3975 0.2 Wesleyville Beach 43.9195,-78.3975 43.9202,-78.3955 0.29 Wesleyville Beach 43.9282,-78.3803 43.9299,-78.3731 0.2 Willow Beach 43.9299,-78.3731 43.9302,-78.3681 0.29 Willow Beach 43.9302,-78.3681 43.9308,-78.3605 0.2 Port Britain Road 43.9372,-78.3337 43.9384,-78.3286 0.2 Unknown 43.9409,-78.3019 43.9409,-78.2926 Stable Port Hope West Beach • Wave climate -1 km offshore, west portion (output location W6a): ARI (years) Depth (m) Hs (m) DIR (deg) Tp (s) 5 12.5 4.03 207 9.5 10 12.5 4.20 207 9.5 25 12.5 4.59 205 10.0 50 12.5 4.77 205 10.0 100 12.5 4.94 205 10.0 • Wave climate -1 km offshore, east portion (output location W6b): ARI (years) Depth (m) Hs (m) DIR (deg) Tp (s) 5 12.2 4.34 210 9.5 10 12.2 4.51 210 9.5 25 12.2 4.90 208 10.0 50 12.2 5.06 208 10.0 100 12.2 5.22 208 10.0 Infrastructure and Ecosystem Threats • Jetties at Graham Creek are at risk of breaching at their structure roots (north of composite sections). • Boulton Street and Bond Head Parkette threated by erosion due to sediment deficit. • Bond Head Bluffs: high erosion rates and large gullies threaten homes close to the bluff edge. • West rail line (CN and CP) entering Port Hope is at the crest of an eroding bluff. Shoreline Management Recommendations • Sediment bypassing from west fillet beach at Graham Creek to sediment starved shoreline fronting Bond Head Parkette and Boulton Street. • Bond Head Bluffs: Avoid further development on hazardous lands. Monitor proximity of bluff crest to existing development and slope stability. Relocate homes at risk. • Conservation Authority should regularly update hazard mapping at Bond Head to account for latest toe of slope, slope stability, and erosion. The 2020 hazard mapping must be updated frequently. 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.4 Shoreline Management Plan Page 329 • Maintain naturally eroding bluff environments. Avoid rezoning agricultural land for residential development along gully dominated shoreline. • Relocated buildings along high bluff environments susceptible to erosion and slope stability hazards. • Implement floodproofing measures for development on low lying lands adjacent to the lake (Port Granby, Port Britain). • Monitor rail line west of Port Hope and upgrade shore protection as required. • West Beach at Port Hope would benefit from dune and vegetation restoration to stabilize the back beach and enhance local habitat. • Mechanical bypassing of sediment from Port Hope West Beach to East Beach to avoid sedimentation in the navigation channel. Use Disclaimer The information in this reach summary was prepared for the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority, and the Lower Trent Region Conservation Authority. If used by a third party, they agree that the information is subject to change without notice. Zuzek Inc. and SJL Engineering Inc. assume no responsibility for the consequences of such use or changes in the information. Under no circumstance will Zuzek Inc. or SJL Engineering Inc. be liable for direct, indirect, special, or incidental damages resulting from, arising out of, or in connection with the use of the information in this summary by a third party. 1020.01 Lake Ontario p.5 Shoreline Management Plan Page 330 Attachment 3 to Report PDS-054-21 ciffft"11 October 14, 2021 Small Craft Harbours - Regional Director Fisheries and Oceans Canada 501 University Cres Winnipeg MB R3T 21\16 Email: Jacqueline.blanchette(o)_dfo-mpo.gc.ca Dear Ms. Blanchette, Re: Maintenance and Repair of Federal Piers at Bowmanville Harbour The piers (breakwater structures) at Bowmanville (Port Darlington) Harbour are federally owned (see attached letter). Recently two studies have been completed in partnership with the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) regarding shoreline erosion and disposition. The two studies were being undertaken simultaneously. The Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan spanned three conservation authority boundaries from Pickering to Trenton on Lake Ontario and then a more specific study of the Cedar Crest Beach Embayment Area to the west of the piers at Bowmanville. The consultant on the projects made observations and comments on the condition of the west pier at Bowmanville Harbour as it is lower, less substantial and starting to have breeches along its length. The first study can be viewed at https://www.cloca.com/lake-ontario- shoreline-hazard-manag and the second study is attached to the Clarington staff report at httDs://weblink.clarinaton.net/weblink/0/edoc/340831/PDS-007-21.Ddf. The first study noted on Appendix A, Page 110 under Reach 4 "The west jetty at Bowmanville Creek is in extremely poor condition and requires significant repairs and/or upgrades. The structure has limited ability to trap sand or to dissipate wave energy due to its porosity and low crest. The structure roundhead which features a navigation light is in good condition." We are bringing the condition of the west pier to your attention as it needs maintenance and repair. The piers at Bowmanville are integral to the operation of Port Darlington Harbour Company owned by Wiggers Custom Yachts, Bowmanville Marina and the municipal boat launch with serves many recreational boaters and fishers. Clarington Council has allocated funding for improvements to the municipal boat launch as recreational fishing is an important economic development and tourism generator. The trespass of sands from the littoral drift through the western pier affects navigation and the increase in siltation build up has markedly increased overtime. The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 1-800-563-1195 1 Local:905-623-3379 PNQNrington.net I www.clarington.net Page 2 Please let us know the schedule for when the repairs will be undertaken. Yours sincerely, Faye Langmaid Manager of Special Projects Planning and Development Services FL*av Attachment 1- Letter from Fisheries and Oceans Canada Cc: Steve Brake, Director of Works Ryan Windle, Director of Planning and Development Services Lindsey Park, MPP David Piccini, MPP Erin O'Toole, MP Chris Darling, CAO, CLOCA Page 332 Attachment 1 Fisheries and Nches at oceans Canada Oc6ans Canada Small Craft Harbours Ports pour petits Warm Contra and Arctic Reglan R6gion du Cantle at de I'Arclpue P-O- Sox 85120 C.P. 65120 3027 Harveater Road 3027. chemin Harvester Suite 506 Bureau SW Gurlingtor% 6rdarlo Burlington. Ontario UR 4K3 UR 4K3 TEL W5]889-4= TEL t905)GX-4= FAX (905) 639-5975 FAX [ap5] 639ZO75 04 January 2002 Corporation of the Municipality ofClarington 40 'reinperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario LIC 3A6 Attention: Ms. Cynthia Strike, Planner Community Planning Branch :Y14 Jr1s�i d 2002 NAIIAIL�fI';IIkY01-Cl-fdi11610N k�l.r�i',•tifil• '-k'1d;Ilbl!:id! 111ld 15.2.1 Dar f k Ar frr rrferom 5882 "l3" &nvnianville Dear Ms. Strike: Ile: Sinn]] Craft Harbours Facility: Bowmanville, Ontario Receipt of your letter, dated November 30, 2001, is hereby acknowledged with thanks. In answer to your query, the following is confirmed: ■ The federal Crown has fee simple ownership of the breakwater structures; and • Subject to a reversionary interest in favour of the Provincc of Ontario, title to the land upon which the breakwater structures are located (Parts 1 and 2, Plan IOR-880), rests with the federal Crown, For further information regarding; the federal property at Bowmanville, please refer to the following enclosures: i , Letter: Shipley/Strike, dated October 23, 1995 (minus enclosures); 2. Letter: Blanchard/Stockwell, dated January 21, 1997 (minus enclosures)-, 1 Provincial Order -in -Council, O.C. 652179, date March 7, 1979; 4. Federal Order -in -Council, P.C. 1979-2974, dated November 1, 1979; 5, Plan 10R-880 (referred to in 3 and 4 above); CanadIII a Page 333 Ms. Cynthia Strike 5882 " D" Bowmanville January 4, 2002 Page 2 b, Grant of Easement, Instrument No. 125392 (The Port Darlington Harbour Company to the federal Crown), over Part 1, Plan IOR- 1484; 7. Quit Claim, Instrument No. 120097 (Town of Newcastle to the federal Crown), to Part 1, Plan l OR-1484, and 8. Plan IOR-1484 (referred to in 5 and 7 above), If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office, urs sincerely D.G. Blanchar�4 Director Page 334 Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Joint Committees Date of Meeting: October 25, 2021 Report Number: PDS-055-21 Submitted By: Ryan Windle, Director of Planning and Development Services File Number: COPA2021-0003 & ZBA2021-0011 Resolution#: Report Subject: Recommendation - Additional Dwelling Units - Official Plan and Zonina Bvlaw Amendments Recommendations: 1. That Report PDS-055-21 be received; 2. That the Official Plan Amendment 129 attached to PDS-055-21 as Attachment 3 be approved; 3. That the Zoning Bylaw Amendment attached to PDS-055-21 as Attachment 4 be approved; 4. That staff from Legislative Services present to Council a new Bylaw to replace Bylaw 97-77 to require Additional Dwelling Units be registered with the Municipality; 5. That staff approve applications for Additional Dwelling Units only after Council approves the new Bylaw to replace Bylaw 97-77 to require Additional Dwelling Units be registered with Municipality; 6. That staff be directed to request in writing the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing review the restrictions to provide further flexibility for Additional Dwelling Units within the Greenbelt Plan and the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan; 7. That staff monitor the implementation of these Amendments for Additional Dwelling Units for one (1) year after approval of the Amendments and report this monitoring to Council with any recommended changes to policies, standards, or processes; and 8. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS-055-21 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 335 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Report Overview Page 2 The recommended Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are being advanced as part of Clarington's Affordable Housing Toolkit to respond to a community need for more affordable housing options. Expanding permissions for Additional Dwelling Units (ADUs) is just one `tool' within the Affordable Housing Toolkit that includes affordable housing requirements as we plan new residential areas through secondary plans. The recommended Amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaws would help facilitate the process for property owners who wish to add an ADU within their house or accessory building. The recommended policies and zoning standards have been designed to accomplish a balance between the protection of the health and safety of residents and community character with the need for a straight -forward process. The intention is to facilitate the development of ADUs and increase the supply of affordable housing as soon as possible in line with the most recent legislative changes within the Planning Act. Attachment 1 to this report is a table summarizing public comments and delegations made at the Public Meeting held September 13, 2021. Attachment 2 is a table comparing the current Official Plan policies and Zoning Bylaw regulations to what are now being recommended. It also includes a brief explanatory comment for each recommended amendment and, where relevant, outlines what was changed to the Amendments since the Public Meeting. Attachment 3 is the recommended Official Plan Amendment, and Attachment 4 is the recommended Zoning Bylaw Amendment. 1. Background 1.1 The Planning Act has been amended to require municipalities to update their Official Plans and Zoning Bylaws to allow one ADU within a detached, semi-detached, and townhouse and one ADU within an accessory building on the same lot. This means that a property could have three dwelling units: the principal dwelling unit, an ADU within the principal building, and an ADU within a detached accessory building. 1.2 Shortly after these new permissions were granted, they were quickly incorporated into Clarington's Affordable Housing Toolkit as outlined in Report CAO-013-19. One of the recommendations of that report was for Staff to prepare draft Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments to implement these changes to the Planning Act. In approving this recommendation on November 25, 2019 in Resolution #GG-549-19, Council authorized Staff to commence this project. 1.3 Implementing expanded permissions for ADUs is one more way the Municipality is addressing this important issue. Clarington's Task Force on Affordable Housing, a predominantly citizen -based group that also includes Council members, was formed to Page 336 Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report PDS-055-21 provide advice, comments, and recommendations to Council regarding affordable and senior's housing in the community. 1.4 Inclusionary Zoning would also assist in the provision of affordable housing units. This land use planning tool enables municipalities to require that a proportion of affordable units within proposed residential developments located in Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs) be provided. Both the Courtice and Bowmanville MTSAs will benefit from these provisions. 1.5 The recently approved Southeast Courtice, Southwest Courtice, and Brookhill Neighbourhood Secondary Plans have included policies that require either the dedication of land or payment in lieu of dedication for the development of affordable, public or not -for -profit housing in the community. Current Official Plan Policies 1.6 Currently, the Municipality's Official Plan (OP) permits only one "accessory apartment" within principal residential buildings in Urban Areas. In Rural Areas, only one accessory apartment is permitted, but may be in either a principal residential building or within a detached accessory structure. These current Official Plan policies are not reflected in the Municipality's two Zoning Bylaws, which pre -date the current Official Plan. Current Zoning Regulations 1.7 Zoning Bylaw 84-63 provides regulations for lands outside of the Oak Ridges Moraine (ORM). Section 3.2 was added in 1997 to permit one "apartment -in-house" within the R1, R2, and R3 zones, inclusive of all exception zones, but not within Orono where they are not permitted. Zoning Bylaw 2005-109 provides regulations for lands within the ORM. Section 5.7 permits one "in-house apartment" within a single detached dwelling in Urban Residential Zones. In both Bylaws, one parking space is required for each apartment. Purpose of Report 1.8 The purpose of this report is to provide the context and explain the recommended Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments, as found in Attachment 3 and Attachment 4 to this report. On September 13, 2021 a Statutory Public Meeting was held on those proposed Amendments as contained in PDS-041-21. Those proposed Amendments have been modified as deemed necessary and are now being recommended for approval. Page 337 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PDS-055-21 2. Legislative and Policy Context Bill 108 and Planning Act 2.1 On September 3, 2019, Bill 108, More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 came into effect. In part, it amended the Planning Act to require municipalities to update their Official Plans and Zoning By-laws to increase permissions for ADUs. 2.2 Section 16(3) of the Planning Act now states: "An official plan shall contain policies that authorize the use of additional residential units by authorizing, (a) the use of two residential units in a detached house, semi-detached house or rowhouse; and (b) the use of a residential unit in a building or structure ancillary to a detached house, semi-detached house or rowhouse." 2.3 To ensure the above policies are implemented in zoning bylaws, Section 35.1(1) of the Planning Act now states: "The council of each local municipality shall ensure that the by-laws passed under section 34 give effect to the policies described in subsection 16 (3)." 2.4 As with previous legislation requiring Municipalities to permit ADUs, sections 17 (24.1), 17 (36.1), and 34 (19.1) of the Planning Act provides that the adoption of ADU policies in an Official Plan or amendments to Zoning Bylaws to give effect to the Official Plan policies are not appealable. 2.5 The recommended Amendments allow for one ADU in a principal building and one ADU in an accessory building, except where other provincial policy imposes further restrictions. The recommended Amendments conform to the Planning Act. Ontario Regulations ("O. Regs.") 2.6 Along with the above amendments to the Planning Act, O. Reg. 299/19 (which provides regulations for the new ADU policies) states that ADUs are permitted in existing and future residential buildings, and that only one parking space per ADU shall be required unless a municipality has passed a by-law not requiring a parking space. 2.7 In 1994, O. Reg. 384/94 (which provides regulations for second residential units) came into effect and its regulations must be adhered to, unless more recent regulations are in effect that concern a specific issue within O. Reg. 384/94. 2.8 The recommended Amendments do not distinguish between new or existing residential buildings, except where other provincial policy imposes such restrictions. The Page 338 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Page 5 Amendments require only one parking space per ADU and conform to other provisions of both O. Reg. 299/19 and O. Reg 384/94. The recommended Amendments conform to the relevant O. Regs. Provincial Policy Statement 2.9 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) states that efficient land use patterns support sustainability, and that accommodating appropriate forms of affordable housing is a top priority. Municipalities are to permit and facilitate a broad range of housing options, including ADUs. Intensification assists with cost-effective development patterns and minimizes servicing costs. While residential development is largely directed to settlement areas, the PPS encourages the redevelopment of existing housing stock on rural lands and the efficient use of existing infrastructure. 2.10 The PPS prohibits development in natural heritage features and on lands adjacent to features. 2.11 The recommended Amendments provide for increased housing options through intensification in both urban and rural areas, and contain provisions to protect natural features and adjacent lands, which is consistent with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 2.12 Like the PPS, the policies of the Growth Plan provide for a range and mix of housing options, including ADUs and affordable housing to serve all sizes, incomes, and ages of households. While the Place to Grow plan's primary goal is to direct residential development to settlement areas, it recognizes the benefit of limited rural development so long as it is compatible with the rural landscape, is supported by existing services, and will not adversely affect agricultural and aggregate operations. 2.13 The recommended Amendments provide affordable housing options while also protecting the rural landscape, in conformity with the Place to Grow plan. Greenbelt Plan 2.14 On July 1, 2017, the Greenbelt Plan was updated to specify that, outside of Villages and Hamlets, ADUs are permitted in single detached dwellings or existing accessory buildings on the same lot so long as they are not within the Natural Heritage System (NHS). Since the revised Greenbelt Plan came into effect on July 1, 2017, ADUs are permitted only in accessory buildings that existed on that date. Staff from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) have confirmed this interpretation of `existing.' 2.15 The recommended Amendments allow for one ADU in the Greenbelt Plan area and limit those in accessory buildings to those that existed prior to the revised Greenbelt Plan, which conforms with the Greenbelt Plan. Page 339 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan Page 6 2.16 Like the Greenbelt Plan, the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP) was also updated in 2017. This update included a revised definition of "single dwelling" which contained policy direction on where ADUs could be permitted within the ORM. Clarington Staff discussed this matter with Staff from MMAH. It is now clear that, for lands within the ORM, only one ADU is permitted on a lot, and it must be within a single detached dwelling and only within the Countryside Area (which includes Rural Settlement Areas). This means that ADUs cannot be permitted in Natural Core or Natural Linkage areas, and cannot be permitted in accessory buildings anywhere within the ORM. 2.17 The recommended Amendments limit ADUs to single detached dwellings in specific zones in the ORM, which conforms with the ORMCP. Durham Official Plan 2.18 The Durham Regional Official Plan (DROP) contains policies to encourage the maintenance and improvement of existing housing stock and that 25% of new residential units in each area municipality shall be affordable. The DROP encourages intensification within Urban Areas, including converting single detached dwellings into multiple residential units. The DROP does not speak directly to ADUs within the Rural System, however the Region is currently in the process of a Municipal Comprehensive Review (Envision Durham) which will revise the DROP's policies to be in conformity with Provincial directions, including expanded permissions for ADUs. 2.19 As the recommended amendment does not propose land use designation changes, and conforms to updated provincial policy, there are no Regional Official Plan conformity concerns. 2019-2022 Strategic Plan and Affordable Housing Toolkit 2.20 The 2019-2022 Strategic Plan identified Council's desire to develop an Affordable Housing Policy. In collaboration with the CAO's office, the Municipality has developed an Affordable Housing Toolkit. This Toolkit provides three categories of tools that can be used to help increase the number of affordable housing units in Clarington: Regulatory and Process Tools; Land Based Incentives; and Financial Incentives. ADUs, along with Inclusionary Zoning, reduced parking requirements and an expedited approvals process are some of the Tools that the Planning and Development Services Department can assist with. 3. Areas Where ADUs May or May Not Be Permitted 3.1 While the Planning Act directs municipalities to implement Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments to allow one ADU in a house and one ADU in an accessory Page 340 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Page 7 building, other Provincial policies require restrictions to protect natural features, particularly on lands within the ORM and the Greenbelt. There are also existing Official Plan policies that must be adhered to. Environmental Protection Areas and Hazards 3.2 Legislated provincial policies prohibit development within the NHS and on lands adjacent to the NHS, as well as floodplains and other hazard lands. Consistent with provincial direction, the Clarington Official Plan provides a more refined (and smaller) NHS than provided by the Province. The Official Plan's Environmental Protection Areas (EPA) is comprised of this revised NHS and, in rural areas, a 30 metre vegetation protection zone buffer, as well as floodplains. No development is permitted in the EPA, and thus ADUs are not permitted in the EPA. 3.3 Within Zoning Bylaw 2005-109, which covers lands within the Oak Ridges Moraine, the Official Plan's EPA is (with some minor deviations) zoned Environmental Protection. Thus, by allowing ADUs only within the Prime Agricultural and Rural Settlement zones, the recommended Zoning Bylaw Amendment conforms to Provincial requirements and Official Plan polices regarding the protection of environmental features. 3.4 However, within Zoning Bylaw 84-63, the areas zoned Environmental Protection do not include all of the NHS, its adjacent lands, or all floodplains. To be in conformity with Provincial policy and the Official Plan, the recommended Zoning Bylaw Amendment states that ADUs are not permitted in the Environmental Protection Area, Hazard Land including the Regulatory Shoreline Area as identified in the Official Plan. While zoning bylaws do not typically reference other documents (such as Official Plans) to implement policy, staff feel this approach is acceptable on an interim basis to advance our affordable housing goals. 3.5 At the December 14, 2020 Council meeting, in response to Zone Clarington's first draft of the comprehensive zoning bylaw, Council provided direction to staff on how to amend the EPA designation in the Official Plan and how to implement the provincial requirements to protect natural features in the comprehensive zoning bylaw. Once those amendments have been approved, permissions for where ADUs may be permitted may be expanded further than what is recommended in this report. 3.6 Nonetheless, the recommended Official Plan and Zoning Amendments appended to this report significantly expand permissions for where ADUs may be located and in no case is the current right for an "apartment -in-house" being taken from any property. 3.7 To help visualize the recommended expanded permissions, Figure 1 below shows where there is currently the potential for a single "apartment -in-house" and Figure 2 shows where there is potential for one or two ADUs. Page 341 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Current Potential for an Apartment-in-housz m J1� J � !lu-ra 40. .114.1 Potential for one apartment -in-house Apartments -in-house not permitted Lake Ontario Figure 1- Where apartments -in -houses are currently permitted or not Page 8 Page 342 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Oak Ridges Moraine Area Page 10 3.8 In conformity with the ORMCP, the recommended Official Plan Amendment states that within the ORM, ADUs are only permitted in single detached dwellings, and only within the Protected Countryside (which includes Rural Settlement Areas). ADUs are not permitted in accessory buildings in any areas of the ORM. 3.9 To implement where ADUs are permitted within the ORM, the recommended Amendments to Zoning Bylaw 2005-109 would allow one ADU in a single detached dwelling within the Rural Settlement Zone and the Agricultural Zone. South of the Oak Ridges Moraine Area 3.10 For properties within the Greenbelt (but not within the Official Plan's EPA) only one ADU would be permitted on a lot. The ADU could be within the principal single dwelling, or within an accessory building if it existed on the day the revision to the Greenbelt Plan came into effect (July 1, 2017). The Greenbelt Plan does not have such restrictive policies for Garden Suites, which may be a viable alternative for those properties without existing accessory structures (see section 3.13 below). 3.11 Properties outside the Official Plan's EPA but within Urban Areas (including Orono) and the "whitebelt" (lands that are neither within a settlement area or within the Greenbelt) all have the potential for two ADUS: one ADU in the principal residential building and one ADU in an accessory building, regardless of when the accessory building was constructed. These permissions also apply to the following Hamlets: Mitchell Corners, Solina, Hampton, Maple Grove, Tyrone, Leskard, Kendal, Brownsville, and Newtonville. These permissions also apply to the portions of Enniskillen, Haydon, and Kirby that are not within the ORM. However, the areas of these Hamlets within the ORM are subject to more restrictive policies specific to the ORM. Summary of where ADUs may be permitted 3.12 In summary, the potential for ADUs in different areas of the Municipality is illustrated in Figure 2 (above) and is as follows. For all lands in the Municipality, ADUs (or any development) is prohibited in the Official Plan's EPA and Hazards, including the Regulatory Shoreline Area. • For lands within the ORM, ADUs may be permitted only in single dwellings and only on lands zoned Prime Agricultural (A) and Rural Settlement One (RS1). For lands outside of settlement areas within the Greenbelt, ADUs may be permitted in either a single dwelling or an existing accessory building. Page 344 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Page 11 For lands within Urban Areas (including Orono), Hamlets outside the ORM, and the "whitebelt," one ADU may be permitted in the principal residential building, and one ADU in the associated accessory building. Garden Suites 3.13 Garden suites are self-contained dwelling units which may be permitted on properties with a principal residential dwelling unit. They require a Temporary Use Bylaw, which is similar to a site -specific Zoning Bylaw Amendment, but is only valid for a maximum of 20 years. Garden Suites are not permitted in the ORM, and must be outside the Official Plan's EPA. The Greenbelt Plan restricts ADUs to single dwellings and already -existing accessory buildings, but the Plan does not have such restrictions for Garden Suites. Since Garden Suites are essentially temporary ADUs in accessory buildings, the recommended Official Plan Amendment keeps these as an option, but updates the definition of "Garden Suite" to be in conformity with the definition in the Planning Act. 4. Zoning Standards 4.1 The recommended standards in the Zoning Bylaw Amendments facilitate the process of allowing ADUs while also ensuring there is an appropriate level of regulation to protect the health and safety of its residents and promote liveable, functional, and attractive neighbourhoods. ADUs in principal residential buildings 4.2 The recommended Zoning Bylaw Amendments state that an ADU within a principal residential building cannot be larger than the principal dwelling unit within that building. Though O. Reg 384/94 prohibits regulating the relative size of two units within a principal residential building, this recommended regulation is only to clarify which unit is the ADU when registering the ADU with the Municipality. 4.3 Principal residential buildings in urban areas with an ADU must have a separate entrance from the side or rear if not a shared front door. This urban design regulation applies to all residential building forms, but will be particularly effective in prohibiting potentially four front doors on a semi-detached building for example, if each dwelling contains an ADU. ADUs in accessory buildings 4.4 The recommended Zoning Bylaw Amendments regulating accessory buildings containing an ADU are meant to facilitate a reasonably sized ADU while also ensuring these accessory buildings are secondary to the principal residential building. 4.5 Accessory buildings containing an ADU could be in the front or exterior side only if the principal residential building is set far back on the lot. Other yard setback regulations Page 345 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Page 12 address Ontario Building Code requirements, potential privacy concerns and to ensure sufficient space for stormwater management. The recommended heights are intended to facilitate a one -and -a -half storey ADU within urban areas and a full two storeys in rural areas. 4.6 Accessory buildings with an ADU may, in some instances, be larger than what the Zoning Bylaw currently allows for accessory buildings without an ADU. The purpose of this increased size is to accommodate an ADU, not to increase storage or garage space. The regulations for the size of accessory buildings with an ADU are based on lot coverage so that accessory buildings are an appropriate size relative to the lot on which they are situated. Whichever of the following is reached first is the maximum: 10% of the lot area; or the zone's maximum total lot coverage (usually between 30 to 45%). It should also be emphasized that the floor area of the ADU within an accessory building may not exceed the floor area of the principal residential building. Standards for all ADUs 4.7 Parking requirements remain the same as they are now: one parking space per ADU or Garden Suite. O. Reg. 299/19 states that only one parking space is required for each ADU, unless a municipality passes a bylaw requiring less. Municipalities cannot require more than one parking space per ADU. 4.8 At the Public Meeting, staff were asked to contemplate reducing parking requirements for ADUs when the occupant may not require a parking space. It should be noted that parking requirements (or any zoning standard) cannot be based on who may or may not be occupying the ADU. Due to ongoing concerns about on -street parking, and comments from the public, it is staff's opinion that one parking space per ADU is appropriate, however reductions may be considered on a case -by -case basis through the minor variance process. 4.9 Currently, limited home occupations are permitted within multi -unit buildings. It is recommended that the same opportunities be afforded to those in ADUs, even if they are in an accessory building. 4.10 The Zoning Bylaw Amendment as written would continue to require ADUs to conform to the provisions of the Fire Code and the Ontario Building Code and obtain a building permit. Prior to building permit issuance, any development on properties with private sanitary services and water supply will need an authorizing permit from the Durham Region Health Department confirming there is sufficient capacity in the sanitary system and potable water supply for the ADU. 4.11 The requirement that all ADUs be registered with the Municipality will continue to help enforce conformity to zoning and other regulations. Page 346 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Exception Zones Page 13 4.12 There are two Agricultural Exception Zones that currently permit an "apartment -in- house" with regulations. The recommended Amendments are more permissive, so it is recommended that these Exception Zones be removed to ensure fairness for these property owners. There is also an Exception Zone that would be amended only to update the terminology from "apartment -in-house" to "additional dwelling unit." A fourth Exception Zone would have a standard about front doors removed as this standard would apply to all Urban Residential Zones. 5. Public Participation Public Meeting Notice 5.1 In accordance with the Planning Act, the statutory Public Meeting was advertised at least 20 days prior to the date of the Public Meeting (September 13, 2021). The Public Meeting was advertised in both the Clarington This Week and the Orono Times for four weeks, beginning on August 18, 2021. On that day, the Public Meeting Notice was emailed to those on the Interested Parties List at the time. 5.2 On August 17, 2021, the website www.clarington.net/ADUs was published. The website provides information on the project and hosts the Draft Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments that were presented at the Public Meeting. The website also hosts the recommended Amendments (as found in the Attachment 3 and Attachment 4) as well as staff contact information for members of the public to submit comments and/or questions. 5.3 The owners of the four properties where an Exception Zone is recommended to be removed or amended received the Public Meeting Notice along with a short explanatory letter. Staff have had discussions with the owner of one property with an Exception Zone to be removed who supports the recommended Amendments. Staff have also had correspondence with the owners of the two properties with Exception Zones to be amended and both understand the recommended Amendments have no material effect to their respective properties. 5.4 Prior to the public meeting, this project was the topic of the Mayor's August Column that was published in the Clarington This Week on August 9, 2021. On August 28, 2021, the Clarington This Week published an article about the project and the upcoming Public Meeting. The project was also promoted in the Planning and Development Services eUpdate on July 29, 2021 and September 9, 2021. Public Meeting 5.5 At the Public Meeting held on September 13, 2021, staff report PDS-041-21 was accompanied by a presentation which provided context and summarized the proposed Page 347 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Page 14 Amendments. Four members of the public provided separate delegations. Summaries of these delegations may be found in Attachment 1. Video recording of their delegations, and the two prepared presentations are available on the Municipality's website www.clarington.net/Calendar. Three of the four delegations were supportive of the increased permissions for ADUs but felt the limits for ADUs within the Greenbelt and ORM were too restrictive. The fourth delegation spoke in opposition to increasing ADUs, stating there should be little to no new impervious space and ADUs should only be allowed within existing dwellings. Public Submissions 5.6 Since the Notice of the Public Meeting was first advertised in the newspapers on August 18, 2021, to the writing of this Report, Staff have received comments from twenty-seven residents, three via telephone and the remaining twenty-four via email. Of these twenty- seven comments, five are opposed and five fully support the Amendments. The remaining twenty-two respondents support the Amendments, but with greater or fewer restrictions. 5.7 Public comments are summarized in Attachment 1 to this report. All written public comments have been posted without edits or summaries to the project's website www.clarington.net/ADUs. 6. Department and Agency Comments 6.1 In accordance with the Planning Act, Notice of the Public Meeting was either mailed or emailed to the prescribed public bodies. Over 20 departments and/or agencies were requested to provide comments on the proposed Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments. 6.2 Comments received, including those from Durham Region departments and CLOCA, have no objection to the Official Plan or Zoning Bylaw Amendments. The Region has confirmed that the Official Plan Amendment is exempt from Regional approval. 7. Changes to Amendments Since Public Meeting 7.1 Attachment 2 of this report contains tables comparing the Current Official Plan policies and Zoning Bylaw standards with the recommended Amendments. It also details, where necessary, any changes made to the Amendments from the draft presented at the Public Meeting to the recommended Amendments found in Attachment 3 and Attachment 4 of this report. 7.2 Changes to the Amendments since the Public Meeting do not alter the intent of either the Official Plan Amendment or the Zoning Bylaw Amendment. The changes make refinements to the Amendments to bring them closer to Official Plan conformity and to provide greater clarity. Page 348 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Official Plan Amendment Page 15 7.3 Changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment presented at the Public Meeting to the recommended Amendment found in Attachment 3 of this report include changing a reference from Map H to Map A of the Official Plan to identify Natural Core Areas and Natural Linkage Areas. Staff believe it is more appropriate to reference the Official Plan land use designations rather than those found on Map H, which is a replica of Provincial mapping. These areas on Map A are more refined and smaller. Subsequent references to other land designations are also updated to those found on Map A. 7.4 The draft presented at the Public Meeting contained policies that are covered elsewhere in the Official Plan and apply to the entire Municipality. These do not need to be repeated in the section specifically about ADUs. This includes stating that development is not permitted in the NHS and that an ADU must conform to the Ontario Building Code and Ontario Fire Code. 7.5 The draft presented at the Public Meeting contained a provincially required policy to restrict ADUs within the Greenbelt. That draft stated they were not permitted within the NHS as mapped in the Official Plan. The recommended Amendments instead state ADUs are not permitted within the EPA or Hazards of the Official Plan. As noted in section 3.2 above, the EPA is comprised of the revised, smaller NHS than Provincial NHS mapping and, in rural areas, a 30 metre vegetation protection zone buffer, as well as floodplains. No development is permitted in the EPA, and thus ADUs are not permitted in the EPA. Zoning Bylaw Amendment 7.6 Changes to the Amendments to Zoning Bylaw 84-63 as found in Attachment 4 of this report include increasing the maximum height for accessory buildings containing an ADU from 6 metres to 6.5 metres in rural areas. This increase will accommodate a garage on the main floor (which typically require a higher ceiling than a dwelling unit) and a full second storey for an ADU. The maximum height for accessory buildings containing an ADU in urban areas remains at 5.25 metres to be compatible with neighbouring buildings. 7.7 Changes to the Amendments to Zoning Bylaw 84-63 as found in Attachment 4 of this report also include removing 120 square metres as the maximum size of an accessory building containing an ADU. Instead, the maximum size is limited to the lesser of either 10% of the lot, or the zone's maximum lot coverage. However, the floor area of an ADU within an accessory building must be less than the floor area of principal residential building. Removing the 120 square metre maximum simplifies the requirements, while still being proportionate to the lot on which they are situated and the main residential building. Page 349 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Page 16 7.8 The recommended Amendment to Zoning Bylaw 84-63 now refers to the Official Plan's EPA and Hazard Lands rather than the Official Plan's NHS for where ADUs are not permitted. As explained above in section 3.2 and discussed further in sections 3.4 to 3.7, prohibiting development (including ADUs) from the EPA is more consistent with the current Official Plan. 7.9 Council has provided direction to staff to further refine the EPA in the Official Plan and how to implement these restrictions in the comprehensive zoning bylaw. That work is ongoing and, when completed, may further expand areas where ADUs are permitted. As visualized in Figures 1 & 2 above, this report recommends Amendments that will significantly expand where ADUs would be permitted and will facilitate property owners to increase the supply of affordable housing. 7.10 From the draft presented at the Public Meeting to the recommended Amendments found in Attachment 4 of this report, the only change to the Amendments to Zoning Bylaw 2005-109 is to remove references to the Ontario Building Code and other relevant regulations. It is not necessary to repeat this requirement as it already captured in existing section 1.10 of Zoning Bylaw 2005-109. 8. Next Steps 8.1 The purpose of this report is to recommend Council approve the recommended Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments found in the Attachment 3 and Attachment 4. 8.2 If Council approves the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments to implement these expanded permissions for ADUs, a new bylaw to replace Bylaw 97-77 will be brought to Council which will require ADUs to be registered and their associated regulations can be properly enforced. It is recommended that applications for ADUs not be approved until this new registering bylaw is approved by Council. 8.3 Once the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments are approved by Council, Staff will update the current basement or in-house apartment website to assist residents with applications for adding an ADU to their property. 9. Concurrence The Municipal Solicitor in Legislative Services concurs with the recommendations. 10. Conclusion 10.1 It is recommended that Council approve the recommended Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments as found in the Attachment 3 and Attachment 4 to this report. As noted above the Planning Act states that the adoption of ADU policies in an Official Plan or amendments to Zoning Bylaws to give effect to the Official Plan policies are not appealable. Page 350 Municipality of Clarington Report PDS-055-21 Staff Contacts: Page 17 Mark Jull, Planner II, 905-623-3370 ext. 2426 or miull(a-).clarington.net Lisa Backus, Principal Planner, at 905-623-3370 ext. 2413 or Ibackus clarington.net Attachments: Attachment 1 — Public Comments and Delegations Summary Table Attachment 2 — Comparison Table with Explanatory Comments Attachment 3 — Official Plan Amendment Attachment 4 — Zoning Bylaw Amendment Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 351 CIc7Clllb°COII Public Comment and Delegate Summary Tables Attachment 1 to PDS-055-21 Public Comment Summary Table The following table summarizes the comments received from members of the public since draft Amendments were circulated on August 18, 2021 for the Statutory Public Meeting held on September 13, 2021. All written comments are posted to the project's website without summaries or edits: www.clarinaton.net/ADUs Public Comment Code Summary of Comments Response Name Date Received Method Delivered PC001 Disappointed that an ADU is not permitted in Ontario's Greenbelt Plan states that ADUs are not Regan Trolly his house since it's within the Natural Heritage permitted in the Natural Heritage System. No changes to Aug 19, 2021 System of the Greenbelt. Amendments. Email PC002 Opposes allowing ADUs in a house and Allowing one ADU in a house and one in an accessory Dale Sturrock another in a garage in Bowmanville. States the building is required by the Planning Act. No changes to Aug 19, 2021 Municipality will not be able to handle traffic, or Amendments. Email more students in the schools. PC003 Strongly supports the proposal for ADU in Comment received. No changes to Amendments. Lori Moore primary and additional dwellings. States it's a Aug 23, 2021 progressive way to address housing shortages. Email PC004 Supports idea of more ADUs, but does not want While many areas of the Municipality may have two ADUs Sandra Farrell to see more housing in the Greenbelt or Oak on a lot, only one per lot is permitted within the Greenbelt Aug 25, 2021 Ridges Moraine (ORM). and ORM, and only in certain areas. No changes to Email Amendments. PC005 Phone discussion: Concerned about climate One parking space per ADU is required, and there remain Peggy Clarke impacts (more parking, less open ground, less minimum landscape open space requirements to assist Aug 25, 2021 trees). Concerned about more people smoking with the absorption of stormwater. Smoking regulations are Sept 23, 2021 around her property. beyond the scope of this project. No changes to Phone call Later left voicemail: Concerns about people Amendments. smoking near her backyard. Would like there to Page 352 Public Comment Code Summary of Comments Response Name Date Received Method Delivered be prohibition or regulations for where people may smoke on private property. PC006 Concerned about parking, cars blocking One parking space per ADU is required. Municipal Law Colette Godfrey footpaths, sticking into roads, parking on the Enforcement will continue to enforce parking bylaws. No Aug 29, 2021 street. Adequate off-street parking must be changes to Amendments. Email provided. PC007 Supports the proposed amendments. States it Permitting a triplex by -right is not the intention of the Ryan Carr will help with increased cost of housing. changes to the Planning Act. Recommended heights for Sept 1, 2021 Suggests allowing the third ADU in the principal accessory structures are appropriate to allow 1.5 storeys Email building rather than in accessory building. in urban areas, however the recommended maximum Suggests allowing increased height for height has been increased from 6m to 6.5 to allow a full 2 accessory buildings and allow accessory storeys in rural areas. An accessory building may have a structures to have basements. Suggests basement, so long as it conforms to other zoning reducing parking to one space for all dwelling standards. The requirement for 2 outdoor parking spaces units. for the principal dwelling will remain to help ensure adequate parking. Amendments modified to allow 6.5 metres in rural areas. PC008 Supports ADUs. New housing is not affordable. Comment received. No changes to Amendments. Aimie Harris ADUs are an affordable alternative. States Sept 3 developers are paving over farmland, but she Email just wants a second unit on her ORM land so her son can stay and help the family. PC009 Recently moved to Newcastle from Toronto and O. Reg. 299/19 states that Municipalities may require a John Kersey is concerned after seeing ADUs in Toronto not maximum of one parking space per ADU. No changes to Sept 7 being inspected frequently enough. States one Amendments. Email parking space is not enough. PC010 Question about how Municipality will ensure All ADUs will require a building permit. As part of the Esther and Tim Carlton ADUs on private sanitary and water services building permit process, any development on lands Sept 7 will have sufficient capacity. serviced by private services must be reviewed and Email approved by the Durham Region Health Department. No changes to Amendments. PC011 States that these Amendments are part of UN's Comment received. No changes to Amendments. Connie Owen plan to seize all private property. Sept 7 Page 353 Public Comment Code Summary of Comments Response Name Date Received Method Delivered Email PC012 Supports project. Would like to see same Restrictions on the Greenbelt and ORM are provincially Rudy Kraayvanger permissions across all of Municipality without mandated. No changes to Amendments. However, one of Sept 9 the restrictions on Greenbelt and the Oak the recommendations in the Report is for Council to direct Email Ridges Moraine (ORM). staff to write a letter to the Province to reconsider the restrictions on the Greenbelt and ORM. Mr. Kraayvanger was also a delegate the Public Meeting and his presentation is summarized in the table below. PC013 Supports project. Would like to see permissions The recommended Amendments are as permissive as Michael Longarini further expanded for Garden Suites and ADUs Provincial and Official Plan policies currently allow. No Sept 9 in accessory buildings. Feels cost for changes to Amendments. Email Temporary Use Bylaw for Garden Suites is too high. Mr. Longarini was also a delegate the Public Meeting and his presentation is summarized in the table below. PC014 Supports project. Asks for relaxing some of the The specific requests may be dealt with through a Minor Frank Johansen zoning standards, questions for clarification. Variance application. No changes to Amendments. Sept 9 Email PC015 Supports project, would to have/live in an ADU. Comment received. No changes to Amendments. Chad Veinot Sept 10 Email PC016 Supports project. Notes need for affordable An accessory building may have a basement, so long as it Dianne Phillips options for adult children. Questions about size conforms to other zoning standards. No changes to Sept 12 limits and if accessory can have basement. Amendments. Email PC017 Opposes any new ADUs. States there are Comment received. Municipal Law Enforcement will Lynne and Stephen many illegal apartments and cars parked on continue to enforce Municipal Bylaws, including those Janssens streets and concerns with traffic. States there is concerning parking. No changes to Amendments. Sept 12 no regulations for decks, other structures, or Page 354 Public Comment Code Summary of Comments Response Name Date Received Method Delivered Email parking. Says regulation will not occur and illegal units will be built. PCO18 Would like to know how parking will be Municipalities may require a maximum of one parking Shirley Andrechuk addressed. States that cars already fill space per ADU. Municipal Law Enforcement will continue Sept 12 driveways and roads. Also states that taxes will to enforce parking regulations. No changes to Email go down because ADUs are unattractive. Amendments. PC019 Supports project. Wants to add an ADU to her Comment received. No changes to Amendments. Kelly Schmidt property in Kendal for her parents. Sept 13 Email PCO20 States there shouldn't be a 2017 `cut off' date The Greenbelt Plan was updated in 2017 and included the Aimie Harris for accessory buildings in the Greenbelt. States restriction of ADUs in accessory buildings to those Sept 13 this will cause a lost opportunity for many "existing." MMAH staff have confirmed July 1, 2017 is the Email families. appropriate date to determine "existing." No changes to Amendments. PCO21 Follow up after her delegation with a set of Restrictions on the ORM are imposed by the Province. No Linda Fockler questions, mainly about her specific property. changes to Amendments. However, one of the Sept 16 Would like to have more permissions for ADUs recommendations in the Report is for Council to direct staff Email within the Oak Ridges Moraine. to write a letter to the Province to reconsider the restrictions on the Greenbelt and ORM. Ms. Fockler was also a delegate the Public Meeting and her presentation is summarized in the table below. PCO22 Supports allowing ADUs, but would like to build Explained Provincial restrictions, but advised he could (if Joe Kay a new accessory building on his lot within the Amendments approved) have an ADU within the existing Sept 23, 2021 Greenbelt. Disappointed but understands the house (and build an addition if desired). Also explained Phone call restrictions are from the Province. Notes the that Council would like staff to send a request to the need for affordable housing and that policies Province asking them to reconsider the restrictions on the and rules should be inclusive of all people, Greenbelt and ORM. including rural people. PCO23 Would like to put an ADU in an existing Explained Provincial restrictions and that our Official Plan Teddy Roeloffzen accessory building. However it is within the and Zoning Bylaw are being comprehensively reviewed Sept 23, 2021 OP's EPA and will likely not be allowed yet. based on Council's direction and an ADU may be Phone call ermitted in the accessory building then. Page 355 Public Comment Code Summary of Comments Response Name Date Received Method Delivered PCO24 Supports allowing ADUs, would like them Comment received. No changes to Amendments. Aimie Harris permitted for family members. Email included Sept 27, 2021 examples of Mennonite housing (single Email dwellings with added units). PCO25 Two follow-up emails from Ms. Racansky's ADUs are part of the Council -approved Affordable Housing Libby Racansky delegation. Suggests that ADUs should not be Toolkit. ADUs will not be permitted within Environmental Sept 27, 2021 considered affordable housing. States that Protection Areas or Hazard Lands (which includes Email affordability will lead to sprawl, and that if one floodplains). Zoning standards limit lot coverage to provide application for an ADU is approved on sensitive open space for stormwater absorption. lands, then we will receive a "flood" of applications. States that on her daily walks she sees the negative effects of development, such as dry wetlands and flooding. PCO26 Supports allowing ADUs, particularly in rural Comment received. No changes to Amendments. Dan Labecki areas. Notes shortage of rental units in the Sept 29, 2021 Municipality. Notes ADUs can provide Email additional income to homeowner and an affordable option for renters. PCO27 Supports allowing ADUs in urban and rural Comment received. No changes to Amendments. Kathleen Flynn areas. Notes the need for additional housing, Sept 29, 2021 hopes Amendments are approved soon. Email Page 356 Summary of Delegations at the Public Meeting held September 13, 2021 Name of Delegate Summary of Comments Response Linda Fockler Ms. Fockler was present in support of additional dwelling units Following Ms. Fockler's presentation, she was (ADUs). She noted that she lives in the Oak Ridges Moraine advised that restrictions to ADUs on the Oak and expressed concerns regarding the restrictions. Ms. Ridges Moraine are provincially mandated. In Fockler questioned if there is a limit for severances for rural response, Ms. Fockler requested that the lands. She explained that the amendments will allow ADUs Municipality ask the province to reconsider these with some limitations for the Oak Ridges Moraine and that the restrictions and allow more flexibility. Though no goal of the restrictions is to preserve the Moraine to ensure changes were made the Amendments, one of the aquifer will remain unpolluted for the GTA community. the recommendations of the Report is for Ms. Fockler added that families living on the Moraine love and Council to direct staff to write such a letter to the protect the lands from individuals who dump garbage, pick up province. garbage others dump, report strangers hanging around and ensures that personal use keeps the land, springs, and creeks in an environmentally pure condition. She expressed that the lands should be protected and stated that ADUs will allow children to return to their parents' lands and continue to protect them. Ms. Fockler requested that, if the goal is to preserve the Moraine, allow families living there to have the opportunity to build ADUs and to ensure the people who care, remain on the land as caregivers. She explained that ADUs would allow older generations to move into new units and how properties with frontages on two side roads would create up to three new homes to assist in complying with the provincial guidelines to create affordable housing. Ms. Fockler concluded by requesting that Council allow small housing, with controlled regulated development that protects the Moraine and to keep the lands out of developers' hands. Rudy Kraayvanger Mr. Kraayvanger was present in support of the Additional The restrictions to ADUs within the Greenbelt Dwelling Units (ADUs) as they allow property owners to do and Oak Ridges Moraine are provincially more with their property. He expressed his concern regarding mandated. Though no changes were made to the confusion between the Oak Ridges Moraine and the Amendments, one of the recommendations Greenbelt. Mr. Kraayvanger stated that there is opportunity to of the Report is for Council to direct staff to write have ADUs within the provincial controlled areas. He stated Page 357 Name of Delegate Summary of Comments Response that existing properties would not be changed or adversely a letter to the province requesting they affected by adding ADUs. reconsider these restrictions and allow flexibility. Mr. Kraayvanger stated that he believes there does not need to be as many limits as suggested in the area and concluded by questioning if all residences will have one front door access or can they have two exterior entrances. Michael Longarini Mr. Longarini was present in support of the Additional Garden Suites are not permitted within the Oak Dwelling Units (ADUs). He stated that Clarington should open Ridges Moraine or within the Environmental up the possibility for ADUs to allow more flexibility in the Protection Areas as identified it the Official Plan. approval process and reduce the barriers and associated As per the Planning Act, they are required to be costs. permitted through a temporary use bylaw. The Mr. Longarini explained that accessory structures can provide definition of `Garden Suite' in the Planning Act a way to take stress off the demand for rural lot creation, or includes that they be "portable." The settlement area expansion. He added that many farms also recommended Amendments to the Official Plan support additional possibilities for worker living areas. removes any requirements about the health or Mr. Longarini stated that the garden suite approvals should be familial relationship of the occupants. There are temporary and that including "portable" in the definition is an no policies about the required setbacks or unnecessary barrier. He explained that the garden suites distance from the principal dwelling, as these should not have restrictions on who the occupants are and would be addressed through the temporary use should be allowed to have extended family, residential rental bylaw. No changes have been made to the or short-term rentals, or any other home business already Amendments. permitted in the area. Mr. Longarini noted that the location of garden suites on large lots should be flexible for maximum setbacks. He questioned if an old garage was converted into a garage/ADU, does it restrict from building another new garage on the property if space allows. Mr. Longarini expressed his concerns regarding the cost of a temporary use by-law and approval process and concluded by stating he hopes to see continued efforts to support affordable housing in rural Clarington. Libby Racansky Ms. Racansky spoke in opposition of the Addional Dwelling Staff feel the recommended Amendments strike Units (ADUs). She explained that the Moraine and Greenbelt a balance between implementing the Planning is exempted from the provincial implementation in Clarington Act's requirements for ADUs and other communities. Ms. Racansky explained that the intensification provincial policy that protects the natural Page 358 Name of Delegate Summary of Comments Response of the Courtice North neighbourhood and its northern rural environment. No development, including ADUs, communities have already removed numerous forested areas. are permitted in wetlands or floodplains. The She added that it caused residents to experience dryness, hot recommended Amendments include minimum temperatures, or wetness, even flooding within the urbanized setbacks and lot coverage to help ensure centers. sufficient open space remains to absorb Ms. Racansky stated that the watershed is important for the stormwater. No changes have been made to the remaining forests, wetlands, and ensures farms have Amendments. sufficient water. She explained that there needs to be a place for affordable housing, but not in an area that is important to the watershed, which has been damaged already. Ms. Racansky stated that intensification is needed in areas where redevelopment would be a positive move, creating desirable and affordable homes without disrupting woodlots. She concluded by explaining that adding ADUs into the lands are not suitable for the watershed because it would further reduce the possibility of infiltration into the ground and increase overland runoff. Ms. Racansky added that the watershed should be included within the Moraine and greenbelt, with an exception of urban lands where the existing basements could be used to satisfy the interest of affordability. Page 359 Clarbgton Attachment 2 to PSD-055-21 Comparison Tables of Draft Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments Additional Dwelling Units (ADUs) Official Plan The Official Plan Amendments are outlined in the table below. The column on the left shows what is currently in the Official Plan. The middle column shows the amendments now being recommended. The column on the right provides a brief explanatory comment on the proposed changes and, where there have been changes made from the Public Meeting Draft to the Recommended Amendment, what those changes are. As the policies are added/deleted/modified, the remaining subsections will be renumbered. Current Official Plan policies Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment Accessory Apartments Additional Dwelling Units Reflects the changes to Section 16(3) of the Planning Act as a result of Bill 108, More 6.3.5 An accessory apartment is permitted in 6.3.5 One additional dwelling unit is Homes, More Choice Act. Urban Areas within a detached or semi- permitted on a lot within a single detached dwelling or townhouse subject to detached, semi-detached, or the following: townhouse dwelling. One additional a) Only one accessory apartment is dwelling unit is permitted within a permitted; detached accessory building on the b) One additional parking space is required same lot. for the accessory apartment in accordance with the Zoning By-law; c) Sufficient water supply and sanitary servicing capacity exists; d) The accessory apartment complies with the provisions of the Ontario Building Code, Ontario Fire Code and any other relevant regulations; and e) The accessory apartment is registered with the Municipality. Page 360 Current Official Plan policies Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment 6.3.6 An accessory apartment is permitted 6.3.6 Notwithstanding 6.3.5, within the Required to be in conformity with the Oak outside of Urban Areas within a detached Oak Ridges Moraine, as shown on Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan dwelling or above or within a detached Map A of this Plan: (ORMCP). In 2017, the ORMCP was accessory building, subject to the following: a) within the Natural Core and amended with a revised definition of "single a) That the accessory building use is Natural Linkage Area designations, dwelling" that limits where ADUs may be maintained; additional dwelling units are not permitted. b) That the accessory apartment complies permitted; and with the development criteria of Section b) within the Prime Agricultural Area, Changed from Public Meeting Draft: 6.3.5; and Rural Area, and Hamlet Reference to Map A rather than Map H. Map c) That in the case of an accessory designations, a maximum of one A has a more refined and smaller mapping of apartment above or within an accessory additional dwelling unit is permitted Natural Core and Natural Linkage with more building, the accessory building is in close on a lot and only within a single specific land designations. proximity to the dwelling and is clearly detached dwelling. secondary to the principal dwelling. The Public Meeting Draft contained a policy to prohibit ADUs within the Natural Heritage System (NHS). However, existing policy 3.4.8 states no development (which would include an ADU) is permitted in the NHS and/or a Hydrologically Sensitive Feature or within its Vegetation Protection Zone. It is not necessary to repeat this policy here. 6.3.7 Notwithstanding 6.3.5, within the Required to conform to Section 4.5.3 of the Protected Countryside of the Greenbelt Plan. Greenbelt Plan, but outside of The revised Greenbelt Plan came into effect Environmental Protection Area as on July 1, 2017 and thus this is the date to be identified in this Official Plan, one considered `existing.' Staff from the MMAH additional dwelling unit is only have confirmed this interpretation. permitted within either a single detached dwelling or an accessory building that existed on (or building Changed from Public Meeting Draft: permits were issued prior to) July 1, Reference to Environmental Protection Area 2017. (EPA) rather than Natural Heritage System (NHS). EPA is the NHS plus a 30 metre buffer, and floodplains. Other Provincially Ie islated policy states that development is Page 361 Current Official Plan policies Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment not permitted on lands adjacent to the NHS. Changing the proposed amendment to reference the EPA is in conformity with Provincial policy and Official Plan policy 14.4.5. Removed reference to map to leave open the possibility to further refine EPA mapping as per policy 14.4.4. Minor rewording for clarity. 6.3.8 Notwithstanding 6.3.5, additional Conforms with policies in 3.7 of the Official dwelling units are not permitted within Plan to prevent personal injury, property Hazard Lands including the damage, or damage to the natural Regulatory Shoreline Area as environment. identified in this Official Plan. Changed from Public Meeting Draft: Removed reference to Map F. 6.3.9 Additional dwelling units shall: Registering ADUs helps ensure conformity to a) be registered with the regulations. Municipality; and b) be compatible with adjacent uses. Changed from Public Meeting Draft: Removed references to the Zoning By-law, Ontario Building Code (OBC) and Ontario Fire Code (OFC). All development must conform to the Zoning By-law and all buildings must conform the OBC and OFC. Stating that ADUs must conform is redundant may cause confusion as to why this is not mentioned elsewhere in the Official Plan. 6.3.10 Where an additional dwelling Supports good urban design. unit is within an accessory building, the accessory building must be Page 362 Current Official Plan policies Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment secondary in size and scale to the principal residential building. 6.3.11 An accessory building To prohibit potential severances of ADUs in containing an additional dwelling unit accessory buildings. may not be severed from the lot accommodating the principal Changed from Public Meeting Draft to residential building. In no case shall clarify that an ADU cannot be considered a an additional dwelling unit be surplus farm dwelling to be severed. considered a residence surplus to a Conforms to Provincial policy to prevent farming operation. fragmentation of farmland. Garden Suites 6.3.12 Except for areas within the Oak Only changes are to policy numbers. Garden 6.3.7 Except for areas within the Oak Ridges Ridges Moraine, one garden suite Suites will continue to be permitted. Due to Moraine, one garden suite may be permitted may be permitted in association with their temporary nature, they may be permitted in association with any single detached any single detached dwelling, through in those areas of the Greenbelt where ADUs dwelling, through a temporary use by-law, a temporary use by-law, subject to in new accessory buildings are not permitted. subject to Section 6.3.8. The garden suite will Section 6.3.13. The garden suite will be permitted for a period of no more than 20 be permitted for a period of no more years provided that there is an agreement than 20 years provided that there is between the owner and the Municipality an agreement between the owner and regarding the occupant, the period of the Municipality regarding the occupancy, the installation, maintenance and occupant, the period of occupancy, removal of the suite, and any financial the installation, maintenance and conditions. removal of the suite, and any financial conditions. 6.3.8 In applying for a temporary use by-law 6.3.13 In applying for a temporary use Updated to reflect new regulatory language for a garden suite, the applicant shall by-law for a garden suite, the for garden suites in section 39.1 of the demonstrate that: applicant shall demonstrate that: Planning Act. Provisions of the Ontario a) There is a need for the garden suite to a) The site is adequate for the Building Code ensure ADUs are properly provide supervised accommodation or care garden suite with regard to lot size, serviced with sanitary and water servicing. for an elderly, sick or disabled person; b) setbacks, layout and private amenity The site is adequate for the garden suite areas; Changed from Public Meeting Draft to with regard to lot size, setbacks, layout and b) The proposal is compatible with remove references to the Zoning By-law, private amenity areas; adjacent uses considering such Ontario Building Code (OBC) and Ontario matters as privacy, noise and Fire Code (OFC). All development must appearance; and conform to the Zoning By-law and all Page 363 Current Official Plan policies Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment c) The proposal is compatible with adjacent c) There is no other accessory buildings must conform the OBC and OFC. uses considering such matters as privacy, building on the lot containing an Stating that Garden Suites must conform is noise and appearance; additional dwelling unit. redundant may cause confusion as to why d) There is adequate on -site parking; this is not mentioned elsewhere in the Official e) There is adequate water supply and Plan. sewage disposal services; and f) There is no accessory apartment on the lot. 12.3.8 An accessory apartment is permitted Deleted Policy to allow "accessory apartments" in in accordance with Section 6.3.6. Rural Settlements no longer needed. 23.19.1 i. An apartment -in-house shall be Deleted This site -specific Official Plan exception is no permitted within a single detached dwelling longer needed as the proposed regulations on those lands identified by Assessment Roll are more permissive. Number 1817-010-010-13850 located in Part Lot 6, Concession 3, Former Township of Darlington having a municipal address of 2898 Concession Road 3, Darlington, subject to the following: One parking space per apartment; a. Structural suitability of building to accommodate alterations for an additional unit; b. Compliance with building and fire regulations and other municipal regulations, including registration; and c. Meet the requirements of the Durham Region Health Department with respect to servicing. Definitions Page 364 Current Official Plan policies Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment Accessory Apartment: a self-contained Additional Dwelling Unit: a self- Revised definition to reflect new "additional second dwelling unit within a permitted contained dwelling unit located within dwelling unit" term. residential dwelling or a permitted accessory a permitted residential dwelling and a building that is clearly secondary to the permitted accessory building and principal dwelling. secondary to the principal building on the same lot. Garden Suite: a self-contained, portable Garden Suite: a self-contained Simplified definition that does not contain dwelling unit located in a side or rear yard of temporary dwelling unit designed to policy direction. Including "portable" in the an existing residential property. be portable and is secondary to the definition conforms with the Planning Act. principal building on the same lot. Page 365 Zoning Bylaws 84-63 and 2005-109 The Zoning Bylaw (ZBL) Amendments are outlined in the tables below. The main purpose of a ZBL is to implement the policies in the Official Plan. The first table concerns proposed changes to ZBL 84-63, which regulates properties south of the Oak Ridges Moraine. The following table concerns proposed changes to ZBL 2005-109, which regulates properties within the Oak Ridges Moraine. Comprehensive ZBL 84-63 (applies to lands south of the Oak Ridges Moraine) The recommended amendments to Zoning By-law 84-63 are outlined in the table below. The column on the left shows what is currently in the ZBL. The middle column shows the recommended amendments. The column on the right provides a brief explanatory comment on the proposed changes and, where there have been changes made from the Public Meeting Draft to the Recommended Amendment, what those changes are. The recommended amendments include the introduction of a definition of additional dwelling units and standards including the location, size, and parking requirements. Amendments also include standards for accessory buildings that contain an ADU. As sections are added/deleted/modified, the remaining subsections will be renumbered. Current Zoning Regulations Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment Definitions Apartment -In -House Additional Dwelling Unit Revised definition to reflect new "additional Shall mean a self-contained second dwelling A self-contained dwelling unit located dwelling unit" term and removal of regulation unit within a permitted residential single within a permitted residential dwelling from definition. detached or semi-detached dwelling created or an accessory building secondary to through converting part of or adding onto a the principal residential building on the dwelling unit. The apartment -in-house shall same lot. be used or intended to be used by one or more persons and shall contain sanitary facilities, kitchen and heating are provided. The apartment -in-house shall have a private entrance from outside the building or from a common hallway or stairway inside the building. Garden Suite Garden Suite Revised definition to conform to definition of A Garden Suite is a self-contained temporary A self-contained temporary dwelling "garden suite" in section 39.1 of the Planning dwelling unit designed to provide for the care unit designed to be portable and is Act. Including "portable" in definition conforms of an elderly, sick and disabled person which secondary to the principal residential with the Planning Act. is located in the side or rear yard of a building on the same lot. Page 366 Current Zoning Regulations Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment property containing a single detached dwelling. Regulations 3.2 Apartment -In -House 3.2 Additional Dwelling Unit 3.2 a. An apartment -in-house shall be 3.2 a. Additional dwelling units are Reflects the changes to section 16(3) of the permitted within a single detached or semi- permitted within any legally permitted Planning Act as a result of Bill 108, More detached dwelling located within the "Urban single detached, semi-detached or Homes, More Choice Act. Residential Type One (R1)", "Urban townhouse dwelling and within an Residential Type Two (R2)" and "Urban accessory building on the same lot, for Residential Type Three (R3)" zones inclusive a maximum total of three dwelling of all exception zones except those units on a lot. exception zones shown on Schedule 12 (Orono) of the Comprehensive Zoning By- law, as amended, and the minimum floor area for an "apartment -in-house" shall be 40 square metres. 3.2 b. i) Notwithstanding subsection a., any 3.2 b. Notwithstanding 3.2 a., Removal of unnecessary legal non - apartment -in-house which existed prior to the additional dwelling units are not conforming statement. Legal non -conforming date of passing of this By-law and is located permitted within the Environmental rights exist regardless of zoning statements, within a single or semi-detached dwelling, is Protection Area or Hazard Land, and are already covered in section 3.6 of the a permitted use. including the Regulatory Shoreline Zoning Bylaw. Area, as identified in the Clarington 3.2 b. ii) Notwithstanding subsection a., any Official Plan. Changed from Public Meeting Draft: apartment -in-house which existed prior to Reference to Environmental Protection Area November 16, 1995 and is located within a (EPA) rather than Natural Heritage System street townhouse or link townhouse in an (NHS) to be in conformity with legislated urban area is a permitted use. Provincial policy and the Official Plan. Section 4.5.3 of the Greenbelt Plan does not permit ADUs in Natural Heritage System (NHS). No development is permitted in the NHS or adjacent lands. The mapped NHS in the Official Plan is more accurate (and smaller) than mapped NHS in Greenbelt Plan. Page 367 Current Zoning Regulations Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment The EPA in the Official Plan is the NHS plus a 30m buffer (in rural areas), and floodplains. ADUs are not permitted in Hazard Lands, which include floodplains as continually updated by Conservation Authorities. Added reference to Hazard Land and Regulatory Shoreline to be in conformity with Official Plan and for clarity. 3.2 c. Notwithstanding 3.2 a., Section 4.5.3 of the Greenbelt Plan allows additional dwelling units are only ADUs only within single detached dwellings or permitted within single detached existing accessory building in the Protected dwellings or accessory buildings that Countryside (but outside Natural Heritage existed on (or where building permits System). This regulation came into effect with were issued prior to) July 1, 2017 for the updated Greenbelt Plan on July 1, 2017. lands within the Protected Countryside This means ADUs cannot be allowed in the within the Greenbelt Plan, if located Greenbelt in accessory buildings built after outside of the Environmental that date, unless building permits had already Protection Area or Hazard Land, been issued. Staff from MMAH have including the Regulatory Shoreline confirmed this interpretation. Area as identified in the Clarington Official Plan. Changed from Public Meeting Draft: Reference to Environmental Protection Area (EPA) rather than Natural Heritage System (NHS) and added reference to Hazard Land and Regulatory Shoreline Area for the same reasons outlined immediately above. 3.2 d. Where an additional dwelling O. Reg 384/94 states that planning unit is located within the principal documents cannot regulate the relative size of residential building, the floor area of two units within a principal building. This the additional dwelling unit shall not proposed zoning regulation is only to clarify exceed the floor area of the principal that the smaller of the two residential units is dwelling unit. the ADU and the larger is the principal dwelling unit. 3.2 e. Within Urban Residential Zones An urban design policy to restrict additional and Mixed Use Zones, entrances for front doors in urban areas. Page 368 Current Zoning Regulations Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment an additional dwelling unit within the principal residential building may be Changed from Public Meeting Draft: through a common door in the front Include Mixed Use Zones where townhouses building facade. Additional, separate and existing single dwellings are permitted. entrances for either the additional dwelling unit or the principal dwelling unit must be accessed via the rear or side yard. 3.2 f. Where an additional dwelling To implement the policy that accessory unit is located within an accessory buildings with an ADU must be secondary in building: size and scale to the principal residential i) The floor area of the additional building. dwelling unit must be no more than the floor area of the principal If an ADU is in an accessory building, the floor residential building; and area of the ADU cannot be larger than the ii) Notwithstanding Section 3.1 c., floor area of the principal residential building. the accessory building must: a) Conform to the zone's front yard If an accessory building contains an ADU, the and exterior side yard setback setbacks for are slightly more restrictive than requirements for residential uses; for an accessory building that does not have b) Have a minimum rear yard and an ADU (as found in the table in Section 3.1 interior side yard setback of 1.8 c. of the Zoning Bylaw). Heights are more metres; permissive to allow 2 storeys in rural areas, c) Not exceed, whichever is less: and 1.5 storeys in urban areas. i) lot coverage of 10% for the additional dwelling unit, or Changed from Public Meeting Draft: ii) the zone regulation's lot Removed the limit of 120 sq. m. from the coverage maximum; and maximum size of accessory structure d) Have a maximum height of 6.5 containing an ADU. Note that the floor area of metres within Agricultural and an ADU in an accessory building must be less Rural Residential Zones, and 5.25 that the floor area of main house. metres within Urban Residential The maximum height for accessory buildings Zones. containing an ADU has increased from 6m to 6.5m in rural areas. This is to accommodate a 2-storey building with a garage on the main Page 369 Current Zoning Regulations Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment floor (which normally has a higher ceiling than a dwelling unit) and a full second storey for an ADU. Removed stating ADUs must conform to zoning, Ontario Building Code, Fire Code and other regulations. It is unnecessary to re -state this here as it covered by existing section 26.7 Compliance with Other Laws. 3.2 g. Additional dwelling units must Registering ADUs helps ensure conformity to be registered with the Municipality. regulations. 3.2 h. A home occupation is permitted Section 3.11 B permits some home within an additional dwelling unit, businesses that are appropriate for multi -unit subject to Section 3.11 B. residential buildings. Parking Space Requirement Table within Section 3.16 Residential (v) a) Apartment -in-house or Residential (v) a) additional dwelling Updated only to reflect "additional dwelling Garden Suite: 1 parking space unit or garden suite: 1 parking space unit" term. for each additional dwelling unit or garden suite. Residential (v) b) Apartment -in-house in Residential (v) b) additional dwelling Updated only to reflect "additional dwelling existence prior to November 16, 1995: nil unit in existence prior to November unit" term. 16, 1995: nil Exception Zones Permitting and/or Regulating Apartments -in -Houses 6.4.85 Agricultural Exception (A-85) Zone Deleted This Agricultural Exception Zone is no longer Notwithstanding Sections 6.1 and 3.2 a., needed as the proposed regulations are more those lands zoned "A-85" on the schedules permissive. to this By-law, may in addition to other uses permitted in the Agricultural (A) Zone, be Page 370 Current Zoning Regulations Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment used for an apartment -in-house and shall be subject to the following zone regulations: a. Regulations for Apartment -in-house i) Floor Area (minimum): 40 square metres ii) Number of bedrooms (maximum): 1 iii) Number of parking spaces (minimum): 1 6.4.93 Agricultural Exception (A-93) Zone Deleted This Agricultural Exception Zone is no longer Notwithstanding Sections 6.1 and 3.2a those needed as the proposed regulations are more lands zoned "A-93" on the Schedule to this permissive. By-law, may in addition to other uses permitted in the Agricultural (A) Zone, be used for an apartment -in-house and shall be subject to the following zone regulations: a. Regulations for Apartment -in-house i) Floor Area (minimum) 40 square metres 12.2.1 f. iv) Entrances for an apartment -in- Deleted Regulations found in proposed Section 3.2 e. house can be found in the front building about front doors apply to all ADUs and so not fagade through a common entrance with the needed for the Neighbourhood Character principal dwelling. Where a separate Overlay Zone. entrance is provided it must be in the side or rear yard. 13.4.87 n. entrances for an apartment -in- Deleted Regulations found in proposed Section 3.2 e. house must be located in the side or rear about front doors apply to all ADUs and so not yard unless it is through a common entrance needed for this site -specific exception zone. of a front fagade. 16.5.37 a. ii) One single detached residential 16.5.37 a. ii) One single detached Updated only to reflect "additional dwelling dwelling provided that no apartment -in-house residential dwelling provided that no unit" term. is contained therein. additional dwelling unit is contained therein. Page 371 Comprehensive ZBL 2005-109 (applies to lands within the Oak Ridges Moraine) The recommended amendments to Zoning By-law 2005-109 are outlined in the table below. The column on the left shows what is currently in the ZBL. The middle column shows the recommended amendments. The column on the right provides a brief explanatory comment on the proposed changes and, where there have been changes made from the Public Meeting Draft to the Recommended Amendment, what those changes are. There have been no changes made from the Public Meeting Draft to the Recommended Amendment. The recommended amendments include the introduction of a definition of additional dwelling units and standards including the location, size, and parking requirements. As sections are added/deleted/modified, the remaining subsections will be renumbered. Current Zoning Regulations Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment Table of Contents 5.7 In -House Apartment Dwellings 5.7 Additional Dwelling Units Updated to reflect "additional dwelling unit" term. Definitions In -House Apartment Dwelling Additional Dwelling Unit Updated to reflect "additional dwelling unit" An apartment dwellin located within a A self-contained dwelling unit within a term, be in conformity with recent provincial permitted single detached dwellin or semi- permitted single detached dwellin policies. detached dwellinq created through converting part of or adding onto the principal As per section 2.7.1 of Zoning Bylaw 2005- dwelling. 109, this definition will be under the parent term `dwelling' and be expressed in this Zoning Bylaw as additional dwellinq unit. Garden Suite Garden Suite Revised definition to conform to definition of A one unit residential structure containing A temporary dwelling unit designed to "garden suites" in section 39.1 of the Planning washroom and kitchen facilities that is be portable and accessory to a single Act (the Act includes "portable"). designed to be portable and that is detached dwellinq on the same lot. accessory to a single detached dwelling Note that Garden Suites are not permitted in constructed on the same lot. the Oak Ridges Moraine. Home occupation permission 5.6.5 In the case of an apartment dwellin or 5.6.5 In the case of an additional Updated to provide occupants of additional a townhouse dwellin , a home occupation dwelling unit, an apartment dwellinq or dwelling units the same opportunities as those shall be restricted to a business or a townhouse dwelling, a home within apartment and townhouse dwellings. administrative office which does not require occupation shall be restricted to a the delivery or pick-up of goods, does not business or administrative office which Page 372 Current Zoning Regulations Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment have clients coming to the dwelling, and does not require the delivery or pick - does not have employees who reside on a up of goods, does not have clients different lot. coming to the dwelling, and does not have employees who reside on a different lot. Regulations 5.7 In -House Apartment Dwellings 5.7 Additional Dwelling Units 5.7.1 An in-house apartment dwelling shall 5.7.1 One additional dwelling unit is Implements Provincial policy that limits ADUs only be permitted in a single detached permitted on a lot in a single detached in the Oak Ridges Moraine to Countryside dwelling or a semi-detached dwelling located dwelling within the "Rural Settlement and Rural Settlement Areas, but outside in an Urban Residential Zone, provided that One (RS1)" and "Prime Agricultural Natural Heritage System, and only within sanitary sewer and water services to the in- (A)" zones. single detached dwellings. house apartment dwellin are provided by a public authority. Changed from Public Meeting Draft: Removed stating ADUs must conform to zoning, Ontario Building Code, Fire Code and other regulations. It is unnecessary to re -state this here as it covered by existing section 1.10 Relation to Other Government Requirements. 5.7.2 An in-house apartment dwellin which 5.7.2 The floor area of the additional O. Reg 384/94 states that planning existed prior to November 16, 1995 and dwellinq unit shall not exceed the floor documents cannot regulate the relative size of which is located within a townhouse dwellinq area of the principal dwelling unit. two units within a principal building. This shall be deemed to be a permitted use, proposed zoning regulation is only to clarify provided that sanitary sewer and water that the smaller of the two residential units is services to the in-house apartment dwelling the ADU and the larger is the principal are provided by a public authority. dwelling unit. 5.7.3 An in-house apartment dwellin shall 5.7.3 Additional dwellin units must be Registering ADUs helps ensure conformity to have minimum floor area of 40 square registered with the Municipality. regulations. metres. 5.7.4 One parking space shall be provided 5.7.4 One parking space shall be Updated only to reflect "additional dwelling for each in-house apartment dwelling. A provided for each additional dwelling unit" term. parking space is not required for an in-house unit. A parking space is not required Page 373 Current Zoning Regulations Recommended Amendments Explanatory comment apartment dwellin established prior to for an additional dwellinq unit November 16, 1995. established prior to November 16, 1995. 6.2.2 (Table 6-2) 6.2.2 (Table 6-2) Updated only to reflect "additional dwelling In -House Apartment: Section 5.7 Accessory Dwelling Unit: Section 5.7 unit" term. Page 374 • Clar ngton Attachment 3 to PDS-055-21 Amendment Number 129 To The Municipality of Clarington Official Plan Purpose: The purpose of this amendment is to implement the changes to policies 16 (3) regarding Additional Residential Units in the Planning Act resulting from Bill 108 — the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019, and ensure the Clarington Official Plan remains in conformity with Provincial goals. Basis: This amendment is based on Section 16 (3) regarding Additional Residential Units and Section 39.1 regarding Garden Suites in the Planning Act, and the standards outlined in Ontario Regulation 299/19 (Additional Residential Units), Ontario Regulation 384/94 (Apartments in Houses), Ontario Regulation 140/02 (Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan), the Greenbelt Plan, and other Provincial policies and regulations. Actual Amendment: The Clarington Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: (*Note: Bold text represents an addition and text with a strike+hro gh represents deleted text.) The subheading `Accessory Apartments' and policies 6.3.5 and 6.3.6 are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following: "Additional Dwelling Units 6.3.5 One additional dwelling unit is permitted on a lot within a single detached, semi-detached, or townhouse dwelling. One additional dwelling unit is permitted within a detached accessory building on the same lot. 6.3.6 Notwithstanding 6.3.5, within the Oak Ridges Moraine, as shown on Map A of this Plan: a) Within the Natural Core Area and Natural Linkage Area designations, additional dwelling units are not permitted; and b) Within the Prime Agricultural Area, Rural, and Hamlet designations, a maximum of one additional dwelling unit is permitted on a lot and only within a single detached dwelling." Page 375 Clarington Attachment 3 to PDS-055-21 2. Existing section 6.3 is amended by adding new policies 6.3.7 to 6.3.11 as follows and all subsequent existing policies are renumbered accordingly: "6.3.7 Notwithstanding 6.3.5, within the Protected Countryside of the Greenbelt Plan, but outside of the Environmental Protection Area as identified in this Official Plan, one additional dwelling unit is only permitted within either a single detached dwelling or an accessory buildings that existed on (or building permits were issued prior to) July 1, 2017. 6.3.8 Notwithstanding 6.3.5, additional dwelling units are not permitted within Hazard Lands including the Regulatory Shoreline Area as identified in this Official Plan. 6.3.9 Additional dwelling units shall: a) be registered with the Municipality; and b) be compatible with adjacent uses. 6.3.10 Where an additional dwelling unit is within an accessory building, the accessory building must be secondary in size and scale to the principal residential building. 6.3.11 An accessory building containing an additional dwelling unit may not be severed from the lot accommodating the principal residential building. In no case shall an additional dwelling unit be considered a residence surplus to a farm operation." 3. The cross reference in renumbered policy 6.3.12 is renumbered to reference 6.3.13. 4. Renumbered policy 6.3.13 is amended as follows: "6.3.13 6.9 In applying for a temporary use by-law for a garden suite, the applicant shall demonstrate that: There is a need for garden suite provide crc-rrc�rrcca�vr- e�urt�tG�rvvrcrc supervised aGGornrnodation er Gae for an elderly, sink or disabled person• e 19-) a) The site is adequate for the garden suite with regard to lot size, setbacks, layout and private amenity areas; c-) b) The proposal is compatible with adjacent uses considering such matters as privacy, noise and Page 376 Clarington Attachment 3 to PDS-055-21 appearance; and where adequatesit�g where adequa+ce water supply -arRd� sewage disppo. copiin ­4 0 f) c) There is no GGesser„ onor/tmen+ other accessory building on the lot containing an additional dwelling unit." 5. The remaining policies in section 6.3 are renumbered accordingly. 6. Policy 12.3.8 is deleted in its entirety. 7. Policy 23.19.1 i. is deleted in its entirety. 8. Section 24.2 Definitions, policy 24.2.1 is amended by deleting the term "Accessory Apartment" and its definition. 9. Section 24.2 Definitions, policy 24.2.1 is amended as follows: "Additional Dwelling Unit: a self-contained dwelling unit located within a permitted residential dwelling or a permitted accessory building and secondary to the principal dwelling on the same lot." 10. Section 24.2 Definitions, policy 24.2.1 is amended as follows: "Garden Suite: a self-contained, portabletemporary dwelling unit IGGated on a side or roar yard of an existing residential property designed to be portable and is secondary to the principal dwelling unit on the same lot." Implementation: The provisions set forth in the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan, regarding the implementation of the Plan, shall apply in regard to this Amendment. Interpretation: The provisions set forth in the Municipality of Clarington Official Plan, regarding the interpretation of the Plan, shall apply in regard to this Amendment. File number: COPA2021-0003 Page 377 • Clar ngton Attachment 4 to PDS-055-21 Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-law Number 20 - being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63. and By-law 2005-109. Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63 and By-law 2005-105 for ZBA2021-0011. Now Therefore Be It Resolved That, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows (*note: Bold text represents an addition to the text and text with a strokethrough represents deleted text): 1. By-law 84-63 is amended as set out in Sections 3 through 11 of this By-law. 2. By-law 2005-109 is amended as set out in Sections 12 through 16 of this By-law. 3. Section 2 — Definitions is amended, as follows: a) By deleting the definition "Apartment -In -House". b) By adding the following definition: "Additional Dwelling Unit A self-contained dwelling unit located within a permitted residential dwelling or an accessory building secondary to the principal residential building on the same lot." c) By deleting the definition "Garden Suite" and replacing it as follows: "Garden Suite A self-contained temporary dwelling unit designed to be portable and is clearly secondary to the principal residential dwelling unit on the same lot." 4. By deleting Section 3.2 and replacing it as follows: "3.2 Additional Dwelling Units a. Additional dwelling units are permitted within any legally permitted single detached, semi-detached or townhouse dwelling and within Page 378 Zoning By-law Amendment PAGE 2 an accessory building on the same lot, for a maximum total of three dwelling units on a lot. b. Notwithstanding 3.2 a., additional dwelling units are not permitted within the Environmental Protection Area or Hazard Land, including the Regulatory Shoreline Area, as identified in the Clarington Official Plan. c. Notwithstanding 3.2 a., additional dwelling units are only permitted within single detached dwellings or accessory buildings that existed on (or where building permits were issued prior to) July 1, 2017 for lands within the Protected Countryside within the Greenbelt Plan, if located outside of the Environmental Protection Area or Hazard Land, including the Regulatory Shoreline Area as identified in the Clarington Official Plan. d. Where an additional dwelling unit is located within a principal residential building, the floor area of the additional dwelling unit must be less than the floor area of the principal dwelling unit. e. Within Urban Residential Zones and Mixed Use Zones, entrances for an additional dwelling unit within the principal residential building may be through a common door in the front building fagade. Additional, separate entrances for either the additional dwelling unit or the principal dwelling must be accessed via the rear or side yard. Where an additional dwelling unit is located within an accessory building: i) The floor area of the additional dwelling unit must be less than the floor area of the principal residential building. ii) Notwithstanding Section 3.1 c., the accessory building must: a) Conform to the zone's front yard and exterior side yard setback requirements for residential uses; b) Have a minimum rear yard and interior side yard setback of 1.8 metres; c) Not exceed, whichever is less: i) lot coverage of 10% for the additional dwelling unit, or ii) the zone regulation's lot coverage maximum; and d) Have a maximum height of 6.5 metres within Agricultural and Rural Residential Zones, and 5.25 metres within Urban Residential Zones. g. Additional dwelling units must be registered with the Municipality. h. A home occupation is permitted within an additional dwelling unit, subject to Section 3.11 B." Page 379 Zoning By-law Amendment PAGE 3 5. The Parking Space Requirement Table within Section 3.16 is amended as follows: Parking Space Re uirement Table Type or nature of use Minimum off street parking requirement (v) 1 parking space for each additional a) ApartmeRt ;R house Additional dwelling unit or garden suite. dwelling unit or Garden Suite b) ApartmeRt_in_house Additional Nil dwelling unit in existence prior to November 16, 1995 6. Section 6.4.85 Agricultural Exception (A-85) Zone and Section 6.4.93 Agricultural Exception (A-93) Zone are deleted. 7. Section 12.2.1 f. iv) and Section 13.4.87 are deleted. 8. Section 16.5.37 a. ii) is deleted and replaced as follows: "One single detached residential dwelling provided that no additional dwelling unit is contained therein." 9. Schedule `l' is amended by changing the zone from "Agricultural Exception (A-85) Zone" to "Agricultural Exception (A-1) Zone" as illustrated on the attached Schedule `A-l' hereto. 10. Schedule `2' is amended, by changing the zone from "Agricultural Exception (A-93) Zone" to "Agricultural Exception (A-1) Zone" as illustrated on the attached Schedule `A-2' hereto. 11.Schedule `A' attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 12.The Table of Contents is amended by deleting the term "In -House Apartment Dwellings" and replacing it with "Additional Dwelling Units". 13. Section 3 — Definitions is amended as follows: a) By deleting the definition "In -House Apartment Dwelling". b) By adding the following definition: "Additional Dwelling Unit A self-contained dwelling unit within a permitted single detached dwellingg." c) By deleting the definition "Garden Suite" and replacing it as follows: "Garden Suite Page 380 Zoning By-law Amendment PAGE 4 A temporary dwelling unit designed to be portable and accessory to a single detached dwellingg on the same lot." 14. By replacing Section 5.6.5 as follows: "5.6.5 In the case of an additional.dwelling unit, apartment dwellin or a townhouse dwelling, a home occupation shall be restricted to a business or administrative office which does not require the delivery or pick-up of goods, does not have clients coming to the dwelling, and does not have employees who reside on a different lot." 15. By deleting Section 5.7 and replacing it as follows: "5.7 Additional Dwelling Units 5.7.1 One additional dwelling unit is permitted on a lot in a single detached dwelling within the "Rural Settlement One (RS1)" and "Prime Agricultural (A)" zones. 5.7.2 The floor area of an additional dwelling unit must be less than the floor area of the principal dwelling unit. 5.7.3 Additional dwellingg units must be registered with the Municipality." 5.7.4 One parking space shall be provided for each in house pa men+ d�uel�i additional dwelling unit. A parking space is not required for an in house pa men+ r/additional dwelling unit established prior to November 16, 1995." 16. Section 6.2.2 is amended as follows: TABLE 6-2 REGULATIONS — NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES Type of Use Number of Parking Spaces Residential /n_ Horne Apa4men Additional dwellingg unit Section 5.7 17. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 and Section 24.2 of the Planning Act. By -Law passed in open session this day of , 20 Page 381 Zoning By-law Amendment PAGE 5 Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk Page 382 Zoning By-law Amendment PAGE 6 This is Schedule "A-1" to By-law 2021- , passed this day of , 2021 A.D. a a 0 W� LU z• w 0 A IQI' lay a• O' J+ CONCESSION-ROAD-3 Zoning Change From 'A-85' To 'A-1' N x Darlington • ZBA 202"011 • Schedule A-1 Page 383 Zoning By-law Amendment PAGE 7 This is Schedule "A-2" to By-law 2021- , passed this day of , 2021 A.D. CONCESSION ROA©-5 I^ � C a 'a 0 0 J Q a W Z OC p W ce Zoning Change From 'A-93'To'A-1' N Clarke • ZBA 2021-0011 • Schedule A-2 Page 384 Municipality of Clarington Joint Committees Resolution # Date: Moved by: Councillor Zwart Seconded by: Whereas the Municipality of Clarington is one of only two communities in Ontario where a local manufacturing facility (St. Marys Cement) has been granted approved under Regulation 79/15 (O.Reg. 79/15) of the Environmental Protection Act to use Alternative Low Carbon Fuel (ALCF) in place of the use of coal and petroleum coke, the location of which is in close proximity to a municipal solid waste thermal treatment facility; Whereas O.Reg. 79/15 sets out eligible alternative fuel sources that include municipal waste, exempts certain approved ALCF activities from requiring a waste disposal Environmental Compliance Approval, and establishes limited operational parameters for approved facilities but does not stipulate applicable air quality monitoring or emissions control requirements; Whereas the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) recently consulted with the public on proposed changes to O.Reg. 79/15 to make it easier for energy -intensive industries to substitute the use of fossil fuels with ALCFs; Whereas residents of Clarington brought forward concerns to local Council with regard to the proposed changes to O.Reg 79/15, which were informed by their familiarity with the application of the legislation locally; and Whereas the MECP's current review of O.Reg. 79/15 did not propose changes to other components of, or potential gaps in the legislation that were a concern to Council and area residents when consulted during St. Marys Cement's recent application for the expanded use of ALCFs; Therefore, be it resolved: The Municipality of Clarington continues to support the objective to reduce the use of fossil fuels and their associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and address climate change; Page 385 That the Municipality of Clarington respectfully requests the Provincial Government undertake a full review of O.Reg. 79/15 under the Environmental Protection Act with a view to: Providing greater control and monitoring of fuel content and on the emissions from approved facilities to ensure the advancement of GHG reduction is not being achieved at the cost of impacted air quality or community health; Ensuring the cumulative effects of proposals on communities is considered as part of a thorough and comprehensive assessment of applications for ALCF use; and Providing mechanisms to monitor and verify that cumulative effects at not occurring and a fulsome analysis to ensure GHG reductions are being achieved by fuel switching. That a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Honourable David Piccini, Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks, MPP (Northumberland -Peterborough South) and Lindsey Park, MPP (Durham). Page 386 Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Joint Committees Date of Meeting: October 25, 2021 Report Number: PWD-027-21 Submitted By: Stephen Brake, Director of Public Works Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: File Number: By-law Number: Report Subject: Proposed Amendment to By-law 2014-059, being a By-law to Regulate Traffic and Parking on Highways, Private Property and Municiaal Property Recommendations: 1. That Report PWD-027-21 be received; 2. That the By-law attached to Report PWD-027-21, as attachment 1, be approved; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report PWD-027-21 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 387 Municipality of Clarington Report PWD-027-21 Report Overview Page 2 The purpose of this report is to amend the Traffic and Parking By-law 2014-051. The recommended amendments will allow for the installation of a new All Way STOP condition at four locations to help improve safety and intersection right-of-way control. The amendments also include a recommendation to formally recognize the new lane configurations that have recently been implemented at the King Street and Scugog Street intersection in Bowmanville. 1. Background 1.1 The Traffic and Parking By-law 2014-051 serves to compliment the Ontario Highway Traffic Act and provides a set of rules to help control traffic and parking in Clarington. As a legislative requirement, STOP and other select signs must be included in the by- law in order to be enforceable. Staff continuously monitor local traffic situations and are recommending four new All Way STOP intersections to be installed by the end of 2021. 2. Recommended All Way STOP intersections 2.1 William Fair Drive at Kenneth Cole Drive William Fair Drive is currently a free flow local street that runs between two arterial roads, Bowmanville Avenue and Middle Road. The roadway has been designed and built as a local residential street but functions more as a collector roadway. Operating speeds along William Fair Drive were periodically collected and were found to be in the low 40 km/h mark. Due to on -going growth in the area, an All Way STOP warrant was conducted at the intersection of William Fair Drive and Kenneth Cole Drive on December 3, 2020. The study data confirmed that the minimum warrant was met with 87% of the required total intersection volume and 103% of the minor street entering volume, with the traffic split very close to being equal. Continued residential growth in the area, including the development east of Middle Road and a future school on the north side of Northglen Boulevard will contribute to a further increase in traffic volumes at this location. Staff recommend the installation of an All Way STOP at this intersection. 2.2 Longworth Avenue at Swindells Street Longworth Avenue is a major street that runs free flow between Mearns Avenue and Liberty Street. There is a municipal park with baseball diamonds, a playground and a splashpad fronting the north side of Longworth Avenue at Swindells Street. The park and the nearby Harold Longworth Public School just east of the park result in increased pedestrian activity at the intersection. Ongoing sightline and parking behavioral complaints at this location have resulted in several public inquiries over time. Parking issue mitigation options were explored by staff but were unsuccessful due to winter Municipality of Clarington Report PWD-027-21 Page 3 maintenance and other operational reasons. Staff have conducted an All Way STOP warrant analysis based on traffic data from June 2018. The warrant levels were found to be at 183% of the required total intersection volume, and at 99% of the minor street entering volume, however, the 17% traffic split is below the recommended threshold of 33%. After a thorough review, staff have found that due to the combined intersection volumes and the on -going sightline safety issues at this location, an All Way STOP is justified. 2.3 Avondale Drive @ Farmington Drive Avondale Drive is a collector road that links Trulls Road and Courtice Road via Sandringham Drive. As Sandringham Drive does not presently connect to Trulls Road, all through traffic is required to use Avondale Road. The future western extension of Sandringham Drive may result in significant changes to local traffic patterns, however, the date of completion is unknown and no progress is currently anticipated by the developer. Additionally, there are two elementary schools and one secondary school in the area that result in high morning and afternoon peak vehicle and pedestrian volumes entering the intersection of Avondale Drive and Farmington Drive. Historically, the split in bell times between the schools was not significant enough to offset traffic volumes and is partially in place to allow for shared school bus transportation between the multiple schools. Staff conducted an All Way STOP warrant justification for the intersection based on traffic data from May 2019. The warrant was justified at 102% of the required total intersection volume and 139% of the required minor street entering volume, with traffic splits being within the required range. Staff recommend the installation of an All Way STOP at this intersection. 2.4 Old Scugog Road at Concession Road 10 Concession Road 10 runs east/west through Clarington at the southern end of the Hamlet of Burketon. Based on field observations and road user feedback, it has been confirmed that Concession Road 10 serves as an alternate route between Bowmanville Avenue and the significant residential development occurring in north Oshawa. Due to the road alignment and the surrounding environmental characteristics of this location, there is a sense that Concession Road 10 is the through road, despite the STOP condition that exists at Old Scugog Road. Over time, staff have received multiple complaints from local residents, Durham Regional Police Service (DRPS) and various road users that report a high frequency of near misses and rolling or no full stops. The intersection has also been highlighted due to poor sightlines at the southwest corner. Staff addressed some of the concerns, including trimming of roadside vegetation and the relocation of signage in order to improve visibility and awareness of the current STOP condition. Staff also conducted an All Way STOP justification warrant based on a November 2019 traffic study. The overall combined traffic volume threshold was well below the required limit. However, due to the higher proportion of traffic volume entering from the minor street and the limited sightlines at the intersection, justification exists to meet the warrant. Page 389 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PWD-027-21 Staff recommend the installation of an All Way STOP at this intersection. 3. New lane configurations at the King Street and Scugog Street intersection 3.1 An operational review of the signalized intersection of King Street and Scugog Street in Bowmanville was conducted in partnership with the Region of Durham. The assessment resulted in the reconfiguration of lanes with the purpose of addressing long queues in the southbound right direction due to combined southbound through movements and a high number of drivers using the southbound left turn lane for through movements. The new configuration optimizes the dominant movements by creating a dedicated southbound right turn lane and combining the significantly lower volume of southbound through and left turn movements. The adjustments have also resulted in combining all northbound movements into a single lane. Signs were installed and pavement markings applied in the Summer of 2021 as part of the Vanstone bridge resurfacing contract. 4. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Director of Legislative Services / Municipal Solicitor who concurs with the recommendations. 5. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that the above traffic control modifications be approved so that the Traffic and Parking By-law 2014-051 can be updated. Staff Contact: Slav Potrykus, Traffic Engineering Supervisor, 905-623-3379 extension 2315 or spotrykus@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 — By-law to Report PWD-027-21 Attachment 2 — Redline Changes to Schedule 9, 10 and 19 Interested Parties: The following interested parties will be notified of Council's decision: DRPS Constable David Ricard Page 390 Attachment 1 to Report PWD-027-21 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-law 2021-XXX Being a by-law to amend By-law 2014-059 entitled "a By-law to Regulate Traffic and Parking on Highways, Private Property and Municipal Property". Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend by-law 2014-059; Now therefore the Council of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Schedules 9, 10, and 19 of Clarington By-law 2014-059 are repealed and replaced with Schedules 9, 10, and 19 of this By-law. 2. That this By-law come into effect on the date it is enacted. Passed in Open Council this XX day of MMMM, 2021. Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk Page 391 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Adelaide Avenue Albert Street Alderbrook Drive Alonna Street Andrew Road Andrew Street Andrew Street and Challenger Court (in combination) Apple Blossom Boulevard Argent Street Argent Street Argyle Street and Duke Street (in combination) Arthur Street Arthur Trewin Street Aspen Springs Drive Auburn Lane Auburn Lane and Auburn Court (in combination) Column 2 From West limit of Adelaide Avenue West limit of Duke Street East limit of Oban Court #3 Alonna Street North limit of Peters Pike East limit of Mill Street North East limit of Arthur Street North limit of Concession Street East North limit of Clayton Crescent North limit of Longworth Avenue North limit of Baseline Road West North limit of Durham Highway 2 South limit of Holyrod Drive East limit of Green Road North limit of Glenabbey Drive North limit of Hemmingway Drive Column 3 To West limit of Trulls Road East limit of Nelson Street West limit of Goldpine Avenue East limit of Martin Road #69 Andrews Road West limit of Arthur Street West limit of Challenger Court West limit of Mearns Avenue south limit of Longworth Avenue South limit of Bons Avenue West limit of Ontario Street South limit of Concession 3 North limit of Elmer Adams Drive West limit of Durham Region Road 57 South limit of Hemmingway Drive East limit of Auburn Court Page 392 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Avondale Drive Avondale Drive Avondale Drive Baldwin Street Bannister Street Barchard Street Baseline Road and Prestonvale Road (in combination) Baseline Road Baseline Road Baseline Road West Baseline Road East Baxter Street Beaver Street North Beaver Street North Beaver Street South Bennett Road and Port Darlington Road (in combination) Column 2 From East limit of Trulls Road East limit of Farmington Drive North limit of Sandringham Drive North limit of Edward Street West limit of West Side Drive North limit of Gusul Avenue South limit of Durham Region Road 22 East limit of Durham Region Road 34 East limit of Holt Road East limit of Durham Region Road 57 East limit of Durham Region Road 14 North limit of Remington Street North limit of King Avenue East South limit of Beaver Street South North limit of Edward Street South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 Column 3 To West limit of Farmington Drive South limit of Sandringham Drive East limit of Richard Gay Avenue South limit of King Avenue West North limit of Milburn Drive South limit of Grady Drive West limit of Durham Region Road 34 West limit of Holt Road West limit of Durham Region Road 57 West limit of Duke Street West limit of Bennett Road South limit of Aspen Springs Drive South limit of Andrew Street South limit of Edward Street East South limit of King Avenue East East limit of Lambs Road Page 393 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Bethesda Road Bill Hutchinson Crescent Bingham Gate Birchfield Drive Black Creek Trail Bloom Avenue Bloor Street Bonathon Crescent and Connors Court (in combination) Bonnycastle Drive Bons Avenue Bons Avenue Boswell Drive Boswell Drive Bottrell Street Bowmanville Avenue Column 2 From North limit of Concession Road 4 South limit of Ronald Hooper Avenue (west leg) East limit of Townline Road South South limit of Hartsfield Drive South limit of Black Creek Trail East limit of Brookhouse Drive East limit of Durham Region Road 34 East limit of Boswell Drive East limit of West Side Drive East limit of West Scugog Lane East limit of Scugog Street South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 West limit of West Side Drive South limit of King's Highway 401 Column 3 To South limit of Durham Region Road 4 South limit of Ronald Hooper Avenue (east leg) West limit of Fenning Drive West limit of Centerfield Drive East limit of Black Creek Trail South limit of William Jose Court West limit of Maple Grove Road East limit of Connors Court South limit of Aspen Springs Drive West limit of Scugog Street West limit of Durham Region Road 14 West limit of Green Road South limit of Harvey Jones Avenue West limit of Millburn Drive South limit of Bowmanville Avenue Page 394 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Bridges Drive Brookhill Boulevard Brookhill Boulevard Brookhouse Drive Brooking Street Broome Avenue Brown Street Brownstone Crescent Brownsville Road Brownsville Road Bruce Cameron Drive Bruce Cameron Drive Bruce Cameron Drive Bruntsfield Street Buttonshaw Street Column 2 From South limit of Edward Street East West limit of Green Road East limit of Green Road South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 North limit of Scottsdale Drive East limit of Harry Gay Drive South limit of Queen Street West limit of Avondale Drive South limit of Brownsville Road North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 West limit of Crombie Street West limit of Kenneth Cole Drive (south leg) East limit of Kenneth Cole Drive North limit of Durham Region Road 22 South limit of McBride Avenue Column 3 To East limit of Glass Court East limit of Boswell Drive East limit of Brookhill Boulevard (east of Clarington Boulevard) South limit of Bloom Avenue South limit of Longworth Avenue East limit of Broome Avenue North limit of Victoria Street West limit of Weaver Street South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 North limit of Brownsville Road East limit of Kenneth Cole Drive West limit of Kenneth Cole Drive (north leg) North limit of Bruce Cameron Drive (south of Henry Smith Avenue) South limit of Glenabbey Drive North limit of McPhail Avenue Page 395 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Carl Raby Street Carveth Crescent Cecil Found Crescent Cedar Crest Beach Road and Cove Road (in combination) Centerfield Drive Centre Street and George Street (In combination) Centerview Street Champine Square Chater Lane Cherry Blossom Crescent Church Street (Bowmanville) Church Street (Bowmanville) Church Street (Bowmanville) Church Street (Newcastle) Church Street (Newcastle) Church Street North From South limit of Ross Wright Avenue East limit of Port of Newcastle Drive East limit of Trulls Road West limit of Cedar Crest Beach Road North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 North limit of Wellington Street East limit of Durham Region Road 17 East limit of Jollow Drive South limit of Concession Road 8 South limit of Nash Road East limit of Scugog Street East limit of George Street East limit of Durham Region Road 14 North limit of Robert Street West North limit of Edward Street North limit of Centerview Street Column 3 To North Limit f Harvey Jones Avenue North limit of Shipway Avenue South limit of George Reynolds Drive West limit of West Beach Road East limit of Varcoe Road South limit of Concession Street West East limit of Centerview Street North limit of Champine Street South limit of Chater Lane East limit of Cherry Blossom Crescent West limit of Temperance Street West limit of Durham Region Road 14 East limit of St. George Street South limit of Edward Street South limit of King Avenue West North limit of Church Street North Page 396 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Church Street South Church Street South Cigas Road Clarington Boulevard Clarke Street Clayton Crescent Clemens Road Cobbledick Road Cobbledick Road Cold Springs Camp Road Cole Avenue Colville Avenue Concession Road 1 (Clarke) Concession Road 1 and Metcalf Street (in combination) Concession Road 10 (Clarke) Concession Road 10 (Darlington) Column 2 From North limit of Somerville Drive North limit of Cobbledick Street North limit of Baseline Road North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 West limit of Mill Street South South limit of Longworth Avenue North limit of Concession Road 6 East limit of Durham Region Road 17 South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 North limit of Durham Region Road 9 North limit of Lawrence Crescent West limit of Gimblett Street East limit of Newtonville Road East limit of Mill Street South East limit of Mosport Road East limit of Old Scugog Road Column 3 To South limit of Cobbledick Street South limit of Station Street East limit of Trulls Road South limit of Brookhill Boulevard West limit of Clarke Street East limit of Clayton Crescent South limit of Concession Road 7 West limit of King's Hwy 35/115 South limit of Cobbledick Road South limit of Boundary Road North limit of Cole Avenue West limit of Colville Avenue West limit of East Townline Road West limit of Newtonville Road West limit of King's Highway 35 West limit of Durham Region Road 57 Page 397 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Concession Road 10 (Darlington) and Townline Road North (in combination) Concession Road 10 and Avery Road (in combination) Concession Road 2 (Clarke) Concession Road 3 (Clarke) Concession Road 3 (Clarke) Concession Road 3 (Clarke) Concession Road 3 (Darlington) Concession Road 3 (Darlington) Concession Road 3 (Darlington) Concession Road 4 (Clarke) Concession Road 4 (Clarke) Concession Road 4 (Clarke) Concession Road 4 (Darlington) Concession Road 4 (Darlington) and Lambs Road (in combination) Concession Road 5 (Clarke) [one[' iTi A From North limit of Durham Region Road 3 East limit of Durham Region Road 57 West limit of Stapleton Road East limit of Durham Region Road 42 East limit of King's Highway 35/115 East limit of Durham Region Road 18 East limit of Durham Region Road 57 East limit of Scugog Street East limit of Durham Region Road 14 East limit of Durham Region Road 42 East limit of King's Highway 35/115 East limit of Durham Region Road 18 West limit of Durham Region Road 42 East limit of Durham Region Road 14 East limit of Durham Region Road 18 Column 3 To West limit of Old Scugog Road North limit of Boundary Road West limit of Concession Road 2 West limit of King's Highway 35/115 West limit of Morgan's Road West limit of East Townline Road West limit of Scugog Street West limit of Durham Region Road 14 West limit of Durham Region Road 42 West limit of King's Highway 35/115 West limit of Durham Region Road 18 West limit of East Townline Road #2963 Concession Road 4 (Darlington) North limit of Concession Road 3 (Darlington) West limit of East Townline Road Page 398 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Concession Road 5 (Clarke) and Patterson Road in combination Concession Road 6 (Clarke) Concession Road 6 (Clarke) Concession Road 6 (Darlington) Concession Road 6 (Darlington) Concession Road 6 (Darlington) Concession Road 6 (Darlington) Concession Road 7 (Clarke) Concession Road 7 (Clarke) Concession Road 7 (Darlington) Concession Road 7 (Darlington) Concession Road 7 (Darlington) Concession Road 7 (Darlington) Concession Road 7 (Darlington) Concession Road 8 (Clarke) [one[' iTiTA From East limit of Durham Region Road 17 East limit of King's Highway 35/115 East limit of Durham Region Road 18 East limit of Townline Road North East limit of Solina Road East limit of Durham Region Road 57 East limit of Liberty Street North Column 3 To West limit of Durham Region Road 18 West limit of Durham Region Road 18 West limit of East Townline Road West limit of Solina Road West limit of Old Scugog Road West limit of Liberty Street North West limit of Darlington -Clarke Townline Road East limit of Darlington -Clarke Townline Road West limit of Leskard Road East limit of Best Road WIMMI [ S are 111112 MINT610 II I East limit of Durham Region Road 34 East limit of Solina Road East limit of Durham Region Road 57 East limit of Liberty Street North West limit of King's Highway 35/115 West limit of Durham Region Road 34 West limit of Solina Road West limit of Durham Region Road 57 West limit of Liberty Street North East limit of Darlington -Clarke Townline Road East limit of Darlington -Clarke Townline Road West limit of Leskard Road Page 399 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Concession Road 8 (Clarke) and The Dell Road (Darlington) (in combination) Concession Road 8 (Darlington) Concession Road 8 (Darlington) Concession Road 8 (Darlington) and Darlington -Clarke Townline Road (in combination) Concession Road 9 (Darlington) Concession Street East Concession Street East Concession Street West Concession Street West Concession Road 5 (Clarke) and Sommerville Drive (in combination) Cornish Drive Courtice Court Courtice Road and Energy Drive (in combination) Courtice Shores Drive [one[' iTi A From East limit of Leskard Road (west junction) East limit of Durham Region Road 57 East limit of Middle Road East limit of Liberty Street North W13ifPi1[ a are n1'i1112 :TO : 61,125 ii1 East limit of Durham Region Road 14 East limit of Mearns Avenue East limit of Beech Avenue West limit of Beech Avenue East limit of Durham Region Road 42 South limit of Kilgannon Avenue West limit of McKnight Road South limit of King's Highway 401 South limit of Energy Drive Column 3 To North limit of The Dell Road ► yr-3m11i11i[e7a&rreIIMWow@I West limit of Liberty Street North North limit of Concession Road 7 (Darlington) West limit of Old Scugog Road West limit of Mearns Avenue West limit of Durham Region Road 42 West limit of Durham Region Road 14 East limit of Elgin Street West limit of Durham Region Road 17 West limit of Fenning Drive West limit of Courtice Court East limit of Energy Drive South limit of Courtice Shores Drive Page 400 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Courtney Street Courtney Street Courvier Crescent Cousins Street Crombie Street Crombie Street Crough Street Dadson Drive Daigle Lane Daiseyfield Drive Darlington Boulevard Darlington Park Road Darlington Street Darlington -Clarke Townline Road David Crescent Davis Court, Hillside Drive and Hillside Court (in combination) Column 2 From West limit of McCorkell Street West limit of Gimblett Street West limit of Swindells Street South limit of Bingham Gate North limit of Northglen Boulevard North limit of William Fair Drive (east leg) North limit of Longworth Avenue South limit of Concession Street East North Limit of Brookhill Boulevard West limit of Trulls Road South limit of Darlington Boulevard West limit of Courtice Road North limit of Concession Road 10 North limit of Durham Region Road 4 West limit of Andrews Road (south junction) North limit of Davis Court Column 3 To East limit of Gimblett Street East limit of Scugog Street West limit of Swindells Street West limit of Fenning Drive South limit of William Fair Drive North limit of William Fair Drive (west leg) North limit of Crough Street East limit of Squire Fletcher Drive South limit of Ted Miller Crescent East limit of Niddery Street South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 West limit of Darlington Park Road North limit of Darlington Street #3595 Darlington -Clarke Townline Road West limit of Peters Pike North limit of Hillside Court Page 401 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Devondale Street Devondale Street Division Street Dodds Square Don Morris Court Doreen Crescent Dorset Street Douglas Kemp Crescent East Shore Drive Column 2 From East limit of Firwood Avenue West limit of Firwood Avenue North limit of Wellington Street West limit of Milburn Drive South limit of Longworth Avenue West limit of Rhonda Boulevard West limit of Solina Road North limit of Ronald Hooper Avenue (west leg) South limit of Lake Road East Townline Road and Lakeshore Road (in combination) East limit of Stephenson Road Edsall Avenue and Rehder Avenue (in combination) West limit of Scugog Street Edward Street East East limit of Beaver Street South Edward Street East East limit of Glass Court Edward Street West East limit of Rudell Road Edwin Carr Street South limit of Northglen Boulevard Column 3 To West limit of Trulls Road East limit of George Reynolds Drive South limit of Lowe Street South limit of Dodds Square South limit of Don Morris Court South limit of Doreen Crescent West limit of Dorset Street North limit of Ronald Hooper Avenue (east leg) North limit of Port Darlington Road (roundabout) South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 West limit of Scugog Street West limit of Glass Court West limit of Brookhouse Drive West limit of Church Street North limit of Concession Road 3 Page 402 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Eldad Drive Eldad Drive Elephant Hill Drive Elford Drive Elgin Street Elgin Street Elliott Street and Mary Street (in combination) Elmer Adams Drive Empire Crescent Energy Drive and Megawatt Drive (in combination) Energy Drive Erskine Drive Farmington Drive Fenning Drive Fenwick Avenue and Hanning Court (in combination) Fieldcrest Avenue Column 2 From East limit of Brookings Street West limit of Brookings Street North limit of Apple Blossom Drive East limit of Hanning Court North limit of Wellington Street North limit of Concession Street West West limit of Old Scugog Road West limit of Holyrod Drive South limit of Foxhunt Trail East limit of Courtice Road East limit of Holt Road North limit of Flood Avenue South limit of Avondale Drive South limit of Gord Vinson Avenue North limit of Hanning Court East limit of Farmington Drive Column 3 To East limit of Scottsdale Drive East limit of Swindells Street West limit of Mearns Avenue North limit of Fenwick Drive South limit of Concession St. West South limit of Fourth Street West limit of Mary Street West limit of Arthur Trewin Street West limit of Foxhunt Trail West limit of Holt Road West limit of Durham Region Road 57 West limit of Thomas Woodlock Street South limit of Farmington Drive South limit of Fenning Drive West limit of Jollow Drive South limit of Stagemaster Crescent Page 403 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Column 2 Highway From Firwood Avenue North limit of Devondale Street Firwood Avenue North limit of Daiseyfield Avenue Flood Avenue East limit of Rudell Road Forsey Lane South limit of Ross Wright Avenue Foster Creek Drive North limit of Edward Street Fourth Avenue North limit of Nash Road Fourth Street East limit of Scugog Street Foxhunt Trail West limit of Foxhunt Trail Fred Jackman Avenue East limit of Kenneth Cole Drive Freeland Avenue East limit of Durham Region Road 14 Galbraith Court North limit of King Street East George Reynolds Drive North limit of Nash Road George Reynolds Drive North limit of Devondale Street George Reynolds Drive West limit of Durham Region Road 34 George Street East East limit of Beaver Street North Gimblett Street North Limit of Bons Avenue Column 3 To South limit of George Reynolds Drive South limit of Adelaide Avenue West limit of Pedwell Street North Limit f Harvey Jones Avenue North limit of Edward Street West limit of Jane Street West limit of High Street West limit of Darlington Boulevard West limit of Crombie Street West limit of Mearns Avenue North limit of Galbraith Court South limit of Devondale Street West limit of Trulls Road East limit of Trulls Road South limit of Andrew Street South limit of Concession Road 3 Page 404 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Glass Court Glenabbey Drive Glenabbey Drive Goldpine Drive Gomme Avenue Goodwin Avenue Gord Vinson Avenue Grady Drive Grady Drive and Remi Court (in combination) Granville Drive Granville Drive Grasshopper Park Road Green Road Green Road Green Road Column 2 From South limit of Edward Street East East limit of Townline Road South East limit of Prestonvale Road North limit of Nash Road East limit of Pedwell Street East limit of Scugog Street East limit of Fenning Drive East limit of Rudell Road West limit of Durham Region Road 17 South limit of Yorkville Drive South limit of John Walter Crescent North limit of Concession Road 8 South limit of Green Road North limit of Remmington Street North limit of Aspen Springs Drive Column 3 To North limit of Bridges Drive West limit of Auburn Lane South limit of Sandringham Drive South limit of Devondale Street West limit of Barchard Street West limit of Argent Street West limit of Roswell Drive East limit of Grady Drive (east of Whitehand Drive) West limit of Remi Court North limit of John Walter Crescent North Limit of Meadowglade Road South limit of Durham Region Road 20 South limit of Remmington Street South limit of Aspen Springs Drive South limit of Boswell Drive Page 405 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Green Road Green Road Green Road Guildwood Drive Gusul Avenue and Donald Powell Crescent (in combination) Hammond Street Hancock Road Harmer Drive Harry Gay Drive Hart Boulevard and Hart Court (in combination) Hartsfield Drive Harvey Jones Avenue Hathaway Drive Hayman Street Hemmingway Drive Herriman Street Column 2 From North limit of Boswell Drive North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 North limit of Nash Road East limit of Mearns Avenue East limit of Pedwell Street South limit of Rustwood Street North limit of Nash Road North limit of Edward Street East North limit of Nash Road East limit of Rudell Road East limit of Varcoe Road East limit of Murray Tabb Street East limit of Whitecliffe Drive South limit of Glenabbey Drive North limit of Pebblebeach Drive East limit of Apple Blossom Boulevard Column 3 To South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 South limit of Nash Road South limit of Durham Region Road 4 South limit of Sprucewood Crescent East limit of Barchard Street North limit of Padfield Drive #3700 Hancock Road West limit of Brookhouse Drive South limit of George Reynolds Drive East limit of Hart Court South limit of Centerfield Drive West limit of Green Road West limit of Robert Adams Drive North limit of Meadowglade Road West limit of Robert Adams Drive West limit of Mann Street Page 406 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Hetherington Drive High Street High Street High Street and First Street (in combination) Hill Street Hobbs Drive Hockley Avenue Holt Road Holt Road Holt Road and Sunny Ridge Trail (in combination) Holyrod Drive Homefield Square Honeyman Drive Hooper Square Hunt Street Huntington Crescent Column 2 From South limit of Lawrence Crescent North limit of Concession Street West North limit of Fourth Street East limit of Elgin Street East limit of Reid Road East limit of Simpson Avenue West limit of Scugog Street North limit of Durham Region Road 4 North limit of Concession Road 6 South Limit of Sunny Ridge Trail East limit of Durham Region Road 34 North limit of Birchfield Drive West limit of Honey man Drive East limit of Rickaby Street North limit of Baseline Road West #201 Huntington Crescent Column 3 To West limit of Lawrence Crescent South limit of Canadian Pacific Railway South limit of Longworth Avenue South limit of Fourth Street West limit of Durham Region Road 18 East limit of Simpson Avenue East limit of West Scugog Lane South limit of Concession Road 6 South limit of Concession Road 7 South limit of Durham Region Road 3 South limit of Holyrod Drive West limit of Homefield Square South limit of Bons Avenue North limit of Hooper Square South limit of Albert Street West limit of Robert Adams Drive Page 407 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Huntington Crescent Huntington Crescent and Beckett Crescent (in combination) Hutton Place Inglis Avenue and Inglis Court (in combination) Irwin Road and Winter Road (in combination) Jackman Road Jane Avenue Jane Street Jennings Drive and Brough Court (in combination) John Matthew Crescent John Scott Avenue and John Scott Court (in combination) John Walter Crescent and Wade Square (in combination) Jollow Drive Jollow Drive [one[' iTi A From #201 Huntington Crescent #1 Huntington Crescent West limit of Sprucewood Crescent North limit of Yorkville Drive West limit of Durham Region Road 17 West limit of Scugog Road North limit of Westmore Street East limit of Durham Region Road 14 West limit of Brough Court West limit of Kenneth Cole Drive (south leg) South limit of John Scott Court #2 John Walter Crescent North limit of Maxwell Court North limit of Freeland Avenue Column 3 To #309 Huntington Crescent #99 Beckett Crescent North limit of Hutton Place West limit of Inglis Court South limit of Winter Road West limit of Jackman Road South limit of George Reynolds Drive West limit of Simpson Avenue East limit of McCorkell Street West limit of Kenneth Cole Drive (north leg) East limit of John Scott Avenue #173 Wade Square South limit of Freeland Avenue South limit of Concession Road 3 Jones Avenue, George Burley Street and Paynes Crescent (in East limit of Durham Region Road 18 South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 combination) Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Kelman Place Kendal Church Street Kenneth Cole Drive Kenneth Cole Drive Kenneth Cole Drive Kershaw Street Kilgannon Avenue King Avenue East King Avenue West King Street West and King Street East (in combination) (Bowmanville) Kingswood Drive Kintyre Street Kurve Inn Road Lake Road Lakebreeze Drive and Toronto Street (in combination) Column 2 From North limit of Longworth Avenue North limit of Old Mill Street North limit of William Fair Drive North limit of Northglen Boulevard South limit of Northglen Boulevard North limit of Concession Street East West limit of Fenning Drive East limit of Durham Region Road 17 West limit of Durham Region Road 17 Durham Region Highway 2 East limit of Townline Road South East limit of George Reynolds Drive South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 East limit of Durham Region Road 14 East limit of Lakebreeze Drive Column 3 To North limit of Kelman Place South limit of Durham Region Road 9 North limit of Kenneth Cole Drive (north of Bruce Cameron Drive) South limit of William Fair Drive West limit of Edwin Carr Street South limit of Apple Blossom Boulevard North limit of Pickard Gate Durham Region Highway 2 Durham Region Highway 2 Durham Region Highway 2 North limit of Kingswood Drive South limit of Devondale Street East limit of Kurve Inn Road West limit of Lambs Road West limit of Mill Street Page 409 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Laking Drive Lambs Lane Lambs Lane Langstaff Road Laurelwood Street Lawrence Crescent Leskard Road Leskard Road and Skelding Road (in combination) Liberty Street North and Concession 7 (in combination) Liberty Street North and Concession Road 8 (in combination) Little Avenue Living Court Longworth Avenue Longworth Avenue Longworth Avenue Loscombe Drive Column 2 From South limit of Harmer Drive North limit of Odell Street North limit of Second Street North limit of Thertell Road South limit of Goodwin Avenue East limit of Waverley Road North limit of Concession Road 7 North limit of Concession Road 8 North limit of Durham Region Road 4 North limit of Concession Road 7 West limit of Cole Avenue West limit of Living Court East limit of Durham Region Road 57 East limit of Swindells Street East limit of Mearns Avenue South limit of Spry Avenue Column 3 To East limit of Harmer Drive South limit of Second Street North limit of Lambs Lane North limit of Langstaff Road North limit of Longworth Avenue North limit of Spry Avenue South limit of Concession Road 8 East limit of Skelding Road West limit of Clemens Road South limit of Durham Region Road 20 South limit of Strike Avenue East limit of Living Court West limit of Durham Region Road 14 West limit of Mearns Avenue East limit of Longworth Avenue West limit of Spry Avenue Page 410 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Lovekin Road Lownie Court Lynwood Avenue and Glenview Road (in combination) Madden Place Mann Street Maple Grove Road Martin Road Martin Road and Prestonway Drive (In combination) Maxwell Court McBride Avenue McCallum Street and Millstream Lane (in combination) McCorkell Street McCrimmon Crescent McCullough Road McFeeters Crescent McKnight Road Column 2 From East limit of Kurve Inn Road West limit of Guildwood Drive North limit of Westmore Street West limit of Sprucewood Crescent North limit of Concession Street East North limit of Baseline Road South limit of Baseline Road North limit of Baseline Road West limit of Rickaby Street West limit of Green Road North limit of Durham Region Road 4 North limit of Brough Court West limit of Rhonda Boulevard North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 North limit of Soper Creek South limit of Baseline Road Column 3 To South limit of Lovekin Road West limit of Lownie Court East limit of Jane Avenue North limit of Madden Place South limit of Apple Blossom Boulevard South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 North limit of King's Highway 401 East limit of Bonnycastle Drive West limit of Maxwell Court West limit of McBride Avenue West limit of King Lane South limit of Concession Rd 3 West limit of Rhonda Boulevard South limit of Concession Road 4 (Hope) West Limit of Soper Creek South limit of McKnight Road Page 411 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway McLellan Drive and McLellan Court (in combination) McMann Crescent McPhail Avenue, Shackelton Street and Kimble Avenue (in combination) Meachin Gate Meadowglade Road Meadowglade Road Meadowview Boulevard Meadowview Boulevard Mearns Avenue Mearns Avenue Middle Road Milburn Drive Mill Street Mill Street North Mill Street South Column 2 From West limit of George Reynolds Drive North limit of Strathallen Drive West limit of McPhail Avenue North Limit of Brookhill Boulevard West limit of Prestonvale Road East limit of Prestonvale Road West limit of Durham Region Road 14 East limit of Scugog Street North limit of King Street East North limit of Concession Street East North limit of Concession Road 3 South limit of Bannister Street East limit of Durham Region Road 17 North limit of Durham Region Road 17 North limit of Clarke Street Column 3 To North limit of McLellan Court North limit of Strathallen Drive East limit of Buttonshaw Street South limit of Ted Miller Crescent North limit of Durham Region Road 22 East limit of Meadowglade Road East limit of High Street West limit of High Street South limit of Concession Street East South limit of Concession Road 3 South limit of Concession Road 4 South limit of Bottrell Street West limit of King's Highway 35/115 North limit of Mill Street North South limit of King's Highway 401 Page 412 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Column 2 Highway From Mill Street, Boulton Street, Lakeshore Road, Stephenson Road (in East limit of Port of Newcastle Drive combination) Milligan Street West limit of Port of Newcastle Drive Millville Avenue East limit of Old Scugog Road Monck Street East limit of Kendal Church Street Morgans Road North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 Mosport Road North limit of Concession Road 8 Moyse Drive East limit of Durham Region Road 34 Mull Crescent West limit of George Reynolds Drive Murray Tabb Street West limit of Boswell Drive Nash Road East limit of Durham Region Road 55 Nash Road East limit of Durham Region Road 34 Nash Road East limit of Holt Road Nelson Lane and Charlesville Lane (in combination) East limit of King Street Nelson Street West limit of Hunt Street Newtonville Road North limit of Lakeshore Road Column 3 To South limit of Concession Road 1 East limit of Toronto Street East limit of Millville Avenue West limit of Durham Region Road 18 South limit of Concession Road 4 South limit of Durham Region Road 20 East limit of Moyse Drive West limit of George Reynolds Drive South limit of Ross Wright Avenue West limit of Durham Region Road 34 West limit of Hancock Road West limit of Green Road North limit of Concession Road 8 North limit of Nelson Street South limit of King's Highway 401 Page 413 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Nicks Street Niddery Street North Division Street and Washington Street (in combination) North Mill Lane North Scugog Court North Street Northglen Boulevard Northglen Boulevard Northglen Boulevard Oban Court Ochonski Road Odell Street Odium Street Oke Road Old Kingston Road Old Mill Street Column 2 From North limit of Bons Avenue North limit of George Reynolds Drive East limit of Old Scugog Road #2 North Mill Lane West limit of West Scugog Lane North limit of King Avenue West East limit of Durham Region Road 57 East limit of Edwin Carr Street East limit of Middle Road East limit of George Reynolds Drive North limit of Concession Road 5 East limit of Prospect Street West limit of Solina Road East limit of Prestonvale Road #3 Old Kingston Road West limit of Old Mill Street Column 3 To South limit of Hockley Avenue South Limit of Adelaide Avenue South limit of Millville Avenue North limit of North Mill Lane North limit of North Scugog Court South limit of Grady Drive West limit of Edwin Carr Street West limit of Middle Road North limit of Concession Road 3 North limit of Oban Court South limit of Durham Region Road 4 #10 Odell St West limit of Odium Street West limit of Glenabbey Drive #41 Old Kingston Road West limit of Durham Region Road 18 Page 414 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Old Scugog Road Old Scugog Road Old Scugog Road Old Scugog Road Old Scugog Road Old Scugog Road Ontario Street Orchard Heights Drive Orchard Park Drive Padfield Drive Page Place Pamela Court Park Lane and Queen Victoria Street (in combination) Park Street Parklawn Drive Column 2 From North limit of Boundary Road South limit of Concession Road 10 South limit of Durham Region Road 3 South limit of Concession Road 7 South limit of Concession Road 6 South limit of Old Scugog Road (at Old Scugog Court) South limit of Queen Street South limit of Andrew Street West limit of Mearns Avenue East limit of Weldrick Crescent West limit of Page Place West limit of Durham Region Road 14 East limit of Mill Street South East limit of Durham Region Road 17 South limit of Stuart Road Column 3 To North limit of Concession Road 10 North limit of Durham Region Road 3 North limit of Concession Road 7 North limit of Concession Road 6 North limit of Durham Region Road 4 South limit of Durham Region Road 4 West limit of Durham Region Road 14 West limit of Arthur Street South limit of Squire Fletcher Drive West limit of Padfield Drive West limit of Niddery Street West limit of Pamela Court North limit of Boulton Street East limit of Park Street North limit of Sandringham Drive Page 415 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Parkway Crescent Partner Drive Pebblebeach Drive Pebblestone Road Pedwell Street Perry Avenue Peters Pike Pickard Gate Pinedale Crescent Poolton Crescent Port Darlington Road Port Darlington Road Port of Newcastle Drive Port of Newcastle Drive Prestonvale Road Prestonvale Road Column 2 From #1 Parkway Crescent South limit of Huntington Crescent East limit of Pinedale Crescent East limit of Durham Region Road 55 South limit of Grady Drive South limit of Perry Avenue South limit of Peters Pike East limit of Townline Road South North limit of Glenabbey Drive South limit of Strathallen Drive South limit of East Shore Drive East limit of East Shore Drive (roundabout) South limit of Clarke Street South limit of Shipway Avenue North limit of Durham Region Road 22 North limit of Glenabbey Drive Column 3 To #91 Parkway Crescent West limit of Meadowglade Road West limit of Auburn Lane West limit of Trulls Road North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 North limit of Perry Avenue South limit of Durham Region Road 4 West limit of Cornish Drive West limit of Pinedale Crescent South limit of Strathallen Drive West limit of East Shore Drive (roundabout) West limit of Lambs Road North limit of Shipway Avenue North limit of Lakebreeze Drive South limit of Meadowglade Road South limit of Whittaker Avenue Page 416 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Prestonvale Road Prince Rupert Drive Prince Street Prince William Boulevard Prospect Street Prospect Street Prout Drive Queen Street Queen Street and St. George St. (in combination) Queen Street, Scugog Street (in combination) Quick Trail Quinn Drive Redfern Crescent Reid Road Remmington Street Column 2 From North limit of Claret Road East limit of Tooley Road East limit of Durham Region Road 14 East limit of Clarington Boulevard North limit of Concession Road West North limit of Second Street East limit of High Street West limit of Durham Region Road 14 East limit of Lambert Street West limit of #73 Ontario Street East limit of Green Road East limit of Waverley Road North limit of Swindells Street North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 West limit of West Side Drive Column 3 To South limit of Robert Adams Drive West limit of Trulls Road West limit of Simpson Avenue East limit of Prince William Boulevard (east of Pethick Street) South limit of Second Street South limit of Fourth Street North limit of Prout Drive East limit of Ontario Street South limit of Church Street South limit of Bons Avenue North limit of Quick Trail West limit of Lawrence Crescent West limit of Swindells Street South limit of Concession Road 4 East limit of Green Road Page 417 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Renwick Road and Decoe Court (in combination) Resnick Drive Rhonda Boulevard and Kings Hill Lane (in combination) Richard Davies Crescent Richard Gay Avenue Richfield Square Robert Adams Drive Robert Adams Drive Ronald Hooper Avenue Ronald Hooper Avenue Roser Crescent Ross Wright Avenue Rosswell Drive Rowe Street Roy Cartier Street Column 2 From South limit of Decoe Court East limit of Arthur Street West limit of Waverley Road West limit of Kenneth Cole Drive (north leg) South limit of Richard Gay Avenue North limit of Nash Road North limit of Glenabbey Drive North limit of Hampstead Gate East limit of Edwin Carr Street East limit of Middle Road #2 Roser Crescent West limit of Ross Wright Avenue (west of Murray Tabb Avenue) South limit of Gord Vinson Avenue North limit of Rowe Street West limit of Old Scugog Road Column 3 To South limit of Robert Adams Drive West limit of Andrew Street East limit of Chapel Street West limit of Kenneth Cole Drive (south leg) North limit of Richard Gay Avenue East limit of Richfield Square South limit of Hampstead Gate West limit of Prestonvale Road West limit of Middle Road West limit of Northglen Boulevard #132 Roser Crescent West limit of Green Road North limit of Southfield Avenue North limit of Station Street East limit of Darlington Street Page 418 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Column 2 Highway From Roy Nichols Drive East limit of Fenning Drive Rudell Road North limit of King's Highway 401 Rudell Road North limit of Edward Street Sagewood Avenue East limit of Robert Adams Drive Salter Court West limit of Old Scugog Road Sandringham Drive South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 Sandringham Drive South limit of Claret Road Sandringham Drive East Limit of Trulls Road Scottsdale Drive East limit of Durham Region Road 14 Scugog Street North limit of Bons Avenue Second Street East limit of Prospect Street Shipway Avenue West limit of Port of Newcastle Drive Shipway Avenue East limit of Port of Newcastle Drive Simpson Avenue South limit of King Street East Sleeman Square South limit of George Reynolds Drive Column 3 To South limit of Southfield Drive South limit of Edward Street North limit of Rudell Road (north of Grady Drive) East limit of Robert Adams Drive West limit of Salter Court North limit of Claret Road West limit of Trulls Road West limit of Durham Region Road 34 #291 Scottsdale Drive South limit of Eldad Drive South limit of Concession Road 3 West limit of Elgin Street West limit of Shipway Avenue North limit of Lakebreeze Drive North limit of Baseline Road East East limit of Sleeman Square Page 419 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Column 2 Highway From Solina Road North limit of Durham Region Road 4 Solina Road North limit of Concession Road 6 Sommerville Drive East limit of Durham Region Road 17 Soper Creek Drive East limit of Mearns Avenue South Service Road West limit of Bennett Road Southfield Avenue West limit of Prestonvale Road Southway Drive East limit of Durham Region Road 14 Spicer Square East limit of Martin Road Sprucewood Crescent East limit of Mearns Avenue Spry Avenue East limit of Waverley Road Squire Fletcher Drive West limit of Mearns Avenue Squires Gate Drive West limit of Martin Road Stagemaster Crescent East limit of Avondale Drive Stapleton Road North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 Station Street East limit of Ochonski Road Station Street East limit of Durham Region Road 17 Column 3 To South limit of Concession Road 6 South limit of Concession Road 7 West limit of King's Highway 35/115 South limit of Concession Street East South limit of South Service Road East limit of Fenning Drive West limit of Simpson Avenue South limit of Spicer Square East limit of Mearns Avenue North limit of Baseline Road West #99 Squire Fletcher Drive West limit of Squires Gate Drive East limit of Avondale Drive South limit of Concession Road 4 West limit of Durham Region Road 17 North limit of Cobbledick Street Page 420 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Station Street Stevens Road Stevens Road Strathallen Drive Strathmanor Drive Strike Avenue Stuart Road Sumac Road Sunicrest Boulevard (westbound only) Sunicrest Boulevard and Sunicrest Court (in combination and eastbound only) Sunset Boulevard and Robert Street West (in combination) Swindells Street Swindells Street Swindells Street Sydel Court Column 2 From East limit of King's Highway 35/115 East limit of Durham Region Road 57 West limit of Durham Region Road 57 East limit of Sandringham Drive East limit of Orchard Park Drive East limit of Waverley Road South limit of Strathallen Drive North limit of Concession Road 10 West limit of Durham Region Road 14 West limit of Sunicrest Court East limit of Rudell Road East limit of Durham Region Road 14 North limit of Scottsdale Drive North limit of Longworth Avenue West limit of Durham Region Road 14 Column 3 To North limit of Concession Road 5 East limit of Stevens Road East limit of Green Road West limit of Trulls Road South limit of Strathmanor Drive #34 Strike Avenue North Limit of Sandringham Drive East limit of Old Scugog Road East limit of Shoreview Drive West limit of Durham Region Road 14 West limit of Durham Region Road 17 South limit of Scottsdale Drive South limit of Longworth Avenue South limit of Freeland Avenue West limit of Sydel Court Page 421 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Tabb Avenue Ted Miller Crescent Temperance Street and Lowe Street (in combination) Thertell Road Third Street Thomas Woodlock Street Tooley Road Tooley Road Townline Road North Townline Road South Townline Road South Trudeau Drive Trulls Road Trulls Road Trulls Road Trulls Road Column 2 From East limit of Harry Gay Drive East limit of Boswell Drive North limit of Wellington Street East limit of The Dell Road East limit of High Street South limit of Grady Drive North limit of Nash Road North limit of Pebblestone Road North limit of Durham Region Road 4 North limit of Durham Region Road 22 South limit of Durham Region Road 22 South limit of Concession Street East North limit of Baseline Road North limit of Durham Region Road 22 North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 North limit of Avondale Column 3 To East limit of Tabb Avenue East limit of Boswell Drive West limit of Centre Street West limit of Cold Springs Camp Road West limit of Durham Region Road 14 East limit of Erskine Drive South limit of Pebblestone Road North limit of Tooley Road South limit of Concession Road 6 North limit of Townline Road South South limit of Townline Road South West limit of Trudeau Drive South limit of Durham Region Road 22 South limit of Avondale Drive South limit of Pebblestone Road South limit of Durham Region Highway 2 Page 422 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Trulls Road Tucker Road Valleycrest Drive Vanstone Court Varcoe Road Victoria Street Vivian Drive Wabbokish Court Water Street and Hoy Street (in combination) Waterview Lane Waverley Road Waverley Road Weaver Street Weldrick Crescent Wellington Street Wellington Street Column 2 From North limit of Pebblestone Road East limit of Apple Blossom Boulevard South limit of Nash Road East limit of High Street North limit of Durham Region Highway 2 East limit of Ontario Street East limit of Trulls Road East limit of Durham Region Road 55 South limit of Old Mill Street South limit of Shipway Avenue East limit of Durham Region Road 57 North limit of Lawrence Gate South limit of Brownstone Crescent South limit of Rustwood Street East limit of Scugog Street East limit of Division Street Column 3 To South limit of Durham Region Road 4 West limit of Mann Street East limit of Centerfield Drive East limit of Vanstone Court North limit of Varcoe Road West limit of Durham Region Road 14 North Limit of Vivian Drive East limit of Wabbokish Court West limit of Durham Region Road 18 North limit of Lakebreeze Drive South limit of Lawrence Gate South limit of Kings Hill lane North limit of Avondale Drive West limit of Padfield Drive West limit of Temperance Street West limit of Durham Region Road 14 Page 423 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway West Beach Road West Scugog Lane West Scugog Lane West Side Drive Westlake Street Westmore Street Westover Drive Whitecliffe Drive and Whitecliffe Court (in combination) Whitehand Drive Wilkins Crescent Willoughby Place Willey Drive William Fair Drive William Jose Court Windsor Valley Place Column 2 From West limit of East Shore Drive West limit of Scugog Street North limit of Bons Avenue South limit of Aspen Springs Drive South limit of Dorset Street East limit of Fourth Avenue North limit of North Scugog Court South limit of Whitecliffe Court North limit of Grady Drive West limit of Farmington Drive West limit of Willoughby Place (west of Terry Crescent) South limit of Goodwin Avenue East limit of Kenneth Cole Drive North limit of Bloom Avenue South limit of Nash Road Column 3 To South limit of West Beach Road South limit of Bons Avenue South limit of Concession Road 3 North limit of Baseline Road North limit of Odium Street West limit of Durham Region Road 34 West limit of West Scugog Lane West limit of Robert Adams Drive West limit of Whitehand Drive (west of Noden Crescent) West limit of Farmington Drive West limit of West Scugog Lane East limit of Laurelwood Street West limit of Middle Road East limit of William Jose Court South limit of Windsor Valley Place Page 424 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Column 2 Highway From Woolacott Lane South limit of McBride Avenue Worden Drive North limit of Meadowglade Road Worthington Drive North limit of Auburn Lane Yacht Drive East limit of East Shore Drive Yorkville Drive South limit of Sandringham Drive Yorkville Drive East limit of Granville Drive Column 3 To South limit of Woolacott Lane (south of Buxton Lane) West limit of Hayman Street West limit of Robert Adams Drive North limit of Port Darlington Road West limit of Granville Drive West limit of Trulls Road Page 425 Schedule # 10 Stop Signs Column 1 Intersections Auburn Lane and Glenabbey Drive (all -way stop) Avondale Drive and Trulls Road and Yorkville Drive (all -way stop) Avondale Drive and Farmington Drive (all -way stop) Baseline Road and Holt Road (all -way stop) Baseline Road and Duke Street (3-way stop at MTO facility) Beaver Street South and Edward Street (all -way stop) Beech Avenue and Concession Street West and Burk Court (all -way stop) Best Road and Concession Road 7 (all -way stop) Bridges Drive and Glass Court (all -way stop) Bons Avenue and West Scugog Lane and North Scugog Court (all -way stop) Church Street and Edward Street (all -way stop) [one[' iTiV Facing Traffic Southbound on Auburn Lane, and eastbound and westbound on Glenabbey Drive Westbound on Avondale Drive, northbound and southbound on Trulls Road eastbound on Yorkville Drive Westbound and eastbound on Avondale Drive, northbound on Farmington Drive Northbound and southbound on Holt Road, and eastbound and westbound on Baseline Road Southbound on Duke Street, and northbound on King's Highway 401 off -ramp and eastbound on Baseline Road Eastbound and westbound on Edward Street East, and northbound and southbound on Beaver Street South Northbound on Beech Avenue and southbound on Burk Court, and eastbound and westbound on Concession Street West Southbound and northbound on Best Road, and eastbound and westbound on Concession Street West Northbound and southbound on Glass Court, and westbound on Bridges Drive Northbound and southbound on West Scugog Lane, eastbound on North Scugog Court, and westbound on Bons Avenue Southbound and northbound on Church Street, and eastbound and westbound on Edward Street West Page 426 Schedule # 10 Stop Signs Column 1 Intersections Church Street and Division Street (all -way stop) Church Street and Temperance Street (all -way stop) Church Street and George Street (all -way stop) Claret Road and Prestonvale Road and Whittaker Avenue (all -way stop) Claret Road and Sandringham Drive (all -way stop) Clarington Boulevard and Prince William Boulevard (all -way stop) Clarke Street and Mill Street South and Port of Newcastle Drive (all -way stop) Facing Traffic Eastbound and westbound on Church Street, and northbound and southbound on Division Street Westbound and eastbound on Church Street, and northbound and southbound on Temperance Street Westbound and eastbound on Church Street, and northbound and southbound on George Street Westbound on Claret Road, and eastbound on Whittaker Avenue, and northbound and southbound on Prestonvale Road Westbound on Claret Road, northbound and southbound on Sandringham Drive Northbound and southbound on Clarington Boulevard, westbound and eastbound on Prince William Boulevard Eastbound on Clarke Street, and westbound and southbound on Mill Street South and northbound on Port of Newcastle Drive Clemens Road and Concession Road 7 and Liberty Street North (all -way Eastbound and westbound on Concession Road 7, and southbound on Liberty Street stop) North., and northbound on Clemens Road Concession Road 4 and Middle Road (all -way stop) Concession Road 5 and Patterson Road (north junction) Concession Road 6 and Old Scugog Road (all -way stop) Eastbound and westbound on Concession Road 4, and northbound and southbound on Middle Road Southbound on Patterson Road Westbound and eastbound on Concession Road 6, and northbound and southbound on Old Scugog Road Page 427 Schedule # 10 Stop Signs Column 1 Intersections Concession Road 6 and Solina Road (all -way stop) Concession Road 6 and Townline Road North and Conlin Road (all -way stop) Concession Road 7 and Leskard Road (all -way stop) Concession Road 7 and Solina Road (all -way stop) Concession Road 8 and Leskard Road (all -way stop) Concession Road 8 and Liberty Street North (east junction) Concession Road 8 and Liberty Street North (west junction) Concession Road 8 and Middle Road (all -way stop) Concession Road 10 and Old Scugog Road (all -way stop) Concession Street East and Mearns Avenue (all -way stop) Concession Street West and Elgin Street (all -way stop) Facing Traffic Westbound and eastbound on Concession Road 6, and northbound and southbound on Solina Road Westbound on Concession Road 6, and eastbound on Conlin Road, and northbound and southbound on Townline Road North Eastbound and westbound on Concession Road 7, and northbound and southbound on Leskard Road Westbound and eastbound on Concession Road 7, and northbound and southbound on Solina Road Eastbound and westbound on Concession Road 8, and northbound on Leskard Road Westbound on Concession Road 8 Eastbound on Concession Road 8 Eastbound and westbound on Concession Road 8, and northbound and southbound on Middle Road Eastbound and westbound on Concession Road 10, and northbound and southbound on Old Scugog Road Eastbound and westbound on Concession Street East, and northbound and southbound on Mearns Avenue Eastbound and westbound on Concession Street West, and northbound and southbound on Elgin Street Concession Street West and Horsey Street and Prospect Street (all -way Westbound and eastbound on Concession Street West, and southbound on Prospect Page 428 Schedule # 10 Stop Signs Column 1 Intersections stop) Devondale Street and Firwood Avenue (all -way stop) Division Street and Wellington Street (all -way stop) Edward Street East and Glass Court and Harmer Drive (all -way stop) Edward Street and Rudell Road (all -way stop) Fourth Street and High Street and Vanstone Court (all -way stop) George Reynolds Drive and Devondale Street (all -way stop) Glenabbey Drive and Robert Adams Drive (all -way stop) Gord Vinson Avenue and Fenning Drive (all -way stop) Hancock Road and Nash Road (all -way stop) Holt Road and Nash Road (all -way stop) Facing Traffic Street, and northbound on Horsey Street Eastbound and westbound on Devondale Drive, and northbound and southbound on Firwood Avenue Westbound and eastbound on Wellington Street, and northbound and southbound on Division Street Westbound and eastbound on Edward Street East, and southbound on Harmer and northbound on Glass Court Westbound on Edward Street, and northbound and southbound on Rudell Road Eastbound on Fourth Street, and northbound and southbound on High Street, and westbound on Vanstone Court Northbound and southbound on George Reynolds Drive, and westbound and eastbound on Devondale Street Eastbound and westbound on Glenabbey Drive, northbound and southbound on Robert Adams Drive Eastbound and westbound on Gord Vinson Avenue, northbound on Fenning Drive Northbound and southbound on Hancock Road, and eastbound and westbound on Nash Road Northbound and southbound on Holt Road, and eastbound and westbound on Nash Road Hooper Square and Maxwell Court and Rickaby Street (all -way stop) Northbound and southbound on Rickaby Street, westbound on Hooper Square, and Page 429 Schedule # 10 Stop Signs Column 1 Intersections Kenneth Cole Drive and William Fair Drive (all -way stop) King Lane and Mill Stream Lane (all -way stop) Lakeshore Road and Stephenson Road Lambert Street and Queen Street (all -way stop) Lawrence Crescent and Lawrence Gate and Waverley Road (all -way stop) Leigh Street and Princess Street (all -way stop) Longworth Avenue and Swindells Street (all -way stop) Mearns Avenue and Apple Blossom Boulevard and Sprucewood Crescent (all -way stop) Nash Road and Solina Road (all -way stop) Nash Road and Green Road (all -way stop) Facing Traffic eastbound on Maxwell Court Northbound and southbound on Kenneth Cole Drive, and eastbound and westbound on William Fair Drive Northbound and southbound on King Street, and eastbound and westbound on Mill Stream Lane Westbound on Lakeshore Road Southbound and northbound on Lambert Street, and eastbound and westbound on Queen Street Northbound and southbound on Waverley Road, and eastbound on Lawrence Gate, and westbound on Lawrence Crescent Southbound on Leigh Street, and eastbound and westbound on Princess Street Northbound and southbound on Swindells Street, and eastbound and westbound on Longworth Avenue Northbound and southbound on Mearns Avenue, and westbound on Sprucewood Crescent, and eastbound on Apple Blossom Boulevard Eastbound and westbound on Nash Road, and northbound and southbound on Solina Road Eastbound and westbound on Nash Road, and northbound and southbound on Green Road Nash Road and Rundle Road (all -way stop) Northbound and southbound on Rundle Road, and eastbound and westbound on Page 430 Schedule # 10 Stop Signs Column 1 Intersections Northglen Boulevard and Edwin Carr Street (all -way stop) Ontario Street and Queen Street (all -way stop) Pebblestone Road and Trulls Road (all -way stop) Port of Newcastle Drive and Shipway Avenue (all -way stop) Prestonvale Road and Meadowglade Drive (all -way stop) Prestonvale Road and Glenabbey Drive (all -way stop) Prestonvale Road and Robert Adams Drive and Phair Avenue (all -way stop) Prospect Street and Second Street (all -way stop) Facing Traffic Nash Road Westbound and eastbound on Northglen Boulevard, and northbound on Edwin Carr Street Southbound and northbound on Ontario Street, and eastbound and westbound on Queen Street Westbound and eastbound on Pebblestone Road, and northbound and southbound on Trulls Road Northbound and southbound on Port of Newcastle Drive, and eastbound and westbound on Shipway Avenue Northbound and southbound on Prestonvale Road, and westbound and eastbound on Meadowglade Drive Northbound and southbound on Prestonvale Road, and westbound and eastbound on Glenabbey Drive Northbound and southbound on Prestonvale Road, and eastbound on Robert Adams Drive, and westbound on Phair Avenue Northbound and southbound on Prospect Street, and eastbound and westbound on Second Street Robert Adams Drive and Hampstead Gate and Hathaway Drive (all -way Northbound and southbound on Robert Adams Drive, and eastbound on Hathaway stop) Drive, and westbound on Hampstead Gate Rosswell Drive and Southfield Avenue (all -way stop) Northbound and southbound on Rosswell Drive, and eastbound and westbound on Southfield Avenue Page 431 Schedule # 10 Stop Signs Column 1 Intersections Rosswell Drive and Gord Vinson Avenue and Dewell Crescent (all way stop) Scugog Street and Bons Avenue (all -way stop) Sunicrest Boulevard and Shoreview Drive and Sunicrest Court (2 of 3 way stop) Temperance Street and Wellington Street (all -way stop) Yorkville Drive and Granville Drive (all -way stop) [one[' iTiW Facing Traffic Northbound and southbound on Rosswell Drive, and eastbound on Gord Vinson Avenue, and westbound on Dewell Crescent Northbound and southbound on Scugog Street, and eastbound and westbound on Bons Avenue Westbound on Sunicrest Boulevard, and southbound on Shoreview Drive Northbound and southbound on Temperance Street, and eastbound and westbound on Wellington Street Northbound and southbound on Granville Drive, and eastbound and westbound on Yorkville Drive Page 432 Schedule # 19 Designated Turn Lanes Column 1 Highway Baseline Road Baseline Road King Street East King Street East King Street East King Street West Column 2 Column 3 Between Lanes Spry Avenue and 140 m westerly Eastbound right Duke Street and Regional Road 14 Eastbound right 33 m east of Brown Street to 50 m west of Regional Centre Road 14 62 m east of Regional Road 14 and 42 m east of Centre Lambert Street 60 m east of St. George Street and Simpson Avenue Centre Scugog Street and 50 m westerly Eastbound right Column 4 Times Or Days Anytime Anytime Anytime Anytime Anytime Anytime King Street West Scugog Street and 50 m westerly Eastbound centre Anytime King Street West Scugog Street and 50 m westerly Eastbound left Anytime Scugog Street King Street and 80 m northerly Southbound left Anytime Scugog Street King Street and 80 m northerly Southbound right Anytime Scugog Street King Street southerly Northbound Anytime Simpson Avenue King Street and 70 m southerly Northbound left Anytime Column 5 Direction Eastbound right turn only Eastbound right turn only Two-way Left Turn Lane Two-way Left Turn Lane Two-way Left Turn Lane Eastbound right turn only - buses excepted Eastbound through only Eastbound left turn only Southbound through and left turn only Southbound right turn only Northbound through, left and right turn Northbound left turn only Page 433 Schedule # 19 Designated Turn Lanes Column 1 Highway Simpson Avenue Column 2 Between King Street and 70 m southerly Column 3 Lanes Northbound right Column 4 Times Or Days Anytime Column 5 Direction Northbound right turn only — buses excepted Page 434 Attachment 2 to Report PWD-027-21 Schedule # 9 Through Highways Column 1 Highway Avondale Drive Avondale Drive Longworth Avenue Old Scugog Road Old Scugog Road William Fair Drive Schedule # 10 Stop Signs Column 1 Intersections Avondale Drive and Farmington Drive (all -way stop) Concession Road 10 and Old Scugog Road (all -way stop) Column 2 From East limit of Trulls Road East limit of Farmington Drive East limit of Durham Region Read 'I /1 Swindells Street North limit of Boundary Road South limit of Concession Road 10 East limit of D irham Region Read 57 Kenneth Cole Drive Column 2 Facing Traffic Column 3 To Se th limit of Sandringham Drove West limit of Farmington Drive South limit of Sandringham Drive West limit of Mearns Avenue Concession R•.• 10 North limit of Durham Region Road 3 West limit of Middle Road Westbound and eastbound on Avondale Drive, northbound on Farmington Drive Eastbound and westbound on Concession Road 10, and northbound and southbound on Old Scuaoa Road Page 435 Column 1 Intersections Kenneth Cole Drive and William Fair Drive (all -way stop) Longworth Avenue and Swindells Street (all -way stop) Schedule # 19 Designated Turn Lanes Column 1 Highway Scuqoq Street Scuqoq Street Scuqoq Street Column 2 Between King Street and 80 m northerly King Street and 80 m northerly King Street southerly Column 2 Facing Traffic Northbound and southbound on Kenneth Cole Drive, and eastbound and westbound on William Fair Drive Northbound and southbound on Swindells Street, and eastbound and westbound on Longworth Avenue Column 3 Column 4 Lanes Times Or Days Southbound left Anytime Southbound right Anytime Northbound Anytime Column 5 Direction Southbound through and left turn only Southbound right turn only Northbound throuah, left and riaht turn Page 436 Clarftwn To: From: Date: @ File No.: Re: MEMO If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Mayor and Members of Council Stephen Brake, Director of Public Works October 14, 2021 PA.Wilmot Viewing Platform.1 Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Viewing Platform Replacement The existing timber viewing platform on the west side of Wilmot Creek in the Samuel Wilmot Nature Area is currently unusable due to safety concerns caused by material failure, natural damage and vandalism. A project to remove and replace this structure was approved in the 2021 Capital Budget for $31,500. Quotation (Q2021-12) was originally issued in May 2021 for the rehabilitation of the existing structure. However, this Quotation was cancelled as significant rot was identified in the main structural timber supports during the bidding period that were not included in the contract specifications for replacement. The project was re -quoted as Q2021-31 in September 2021 for the replacement of the entire timber structure. The bidding period closed on October 12, 2021. Four (4) bids were received, all compliant. The unofficial results are as follows: Bidder Total Bid (incl. HST) Total Bid (Net HST Rebate]) Kraco Contracting $ 46,330.00 $ 41,721.60 Forest Ridge Landscaping Inc. $ 52,030.85 $ 46,855.39 GMP Contracting $ 95,457.72 $ 85,962.64 CSL Group Ltd. $ 101,513.55 $ 91,416.10 Kraco Contracting was the low bid at $41,721.60, net HST rebate. Kraco has completed work for the Municipality in the past and references do not need to be checked. At this price, the project will be over budget by a total of $10,221.60. Inflated lumber costs due to the Covid-19 Pandemic are assumed to be the main cause of the budget shortfall for this project. The Public Works Department is requesting the use of the following capital account to fund the overage for the project- - 110-36-325-83723-7401 - Outdoor Recreation Miscellaneous The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 1-800-563-1195 1 Local:905-623-3379 1 info@clarington.net I www.clarington.net Page 437 Page 2 There was originally $125,000 available in this account. To date, the only other expenditure from this account at $15,000 was used for the Bowmanville Creek Fish Counter in July 2021. Regards, Stephen Brake Director Public Works Department SB/KH cc: Trevor Pinn, Director of Financial Services/Treasurer Tony Ricciardi, Manager of Infrastructure, Public Works Kevin Heathcote, Capital Works Supervisor, Public Works The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 1-800-563-1195 1 Local:905-623-3379 1 info@clarington.net I www.clarington.net Page 438 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING RESOLUTION # DATE October 25, 2021 MOVED BY Councillor Janice Jones SECONDED BY Councillor Joe Neal Whereas the residents of Courtice enjoy the use of the Courtice Leash Free Dog Park and have been requesting lighting for safety and increased enjoyment of the park especially during the winter months, Be it resolved that Staff investigate and install lighting at the Courtice Leash Free Dog Park with appropriate funding from the Outdoor Recreation Misc. Upgrade Account. Page 439 Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Joint Committees Date of Meeting: October 25, 2021 Report Number: LGS-027-21 Submitted By: Rob Maciver, Director of Legislative Services Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: File Number: By-law Number: Report Subject: 2022 Municipal Elections — Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes — Policy F110 Recommendations: 1. That Report LGS-027-21, and any related communication items, be received; 2. That the draft By-law containing an updated Policy F110, Use of Corporate Services for Election Purposes, Attachments 1 & 2 to Report LGS-027-21, be approved; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report LGS-027-21 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 440 Municipality of Clarington Report LGS-027-21 Report Overview Page 2 As part of the 2022 Municipal Elections planning, Staff have reviewed the Council approved policy, F110, the Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes, and are suggesting several minor changes. 1. Background 1.1 Section 88.18 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 stipulates that: "Before May 1 in the year of a regular election, municipalities and local boards shall establish rules and procedures with respect to the use of municipal or board resources, as the case may be, during the election campaign period." 1.2 After this change was introduced in 2018, Council passed By-law 2018-028 on April 9, 2018, containing Policy F110, the Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Policy, arising out of Report CLD-008-18 and Report CLD-008-18 Addendum. 1.3 Although the policy has been established, it is best practice to review the policy prior to each regular municipal election. 2. Proposal 2.1 Staff have reviewed the current policy and are recommending some slight changes, mostly to clarify definitions and ensure that it is clear that the Policy applies to Registered Third Party Advertisers. Other changes include some definition changes, and clarity on information included on municipal webpages. Attachment 1 shows a redlined version with the proposed changes. 3. Concurrence Not Applicable, but all Department Heads have reviewed the policy. Page 441 Municipality of Clarington Report LGS-027-21 4. Conclusion Page 3 It is respectfully recommended that the Committee recommend to Council that the attached (Attachments 1 & 2) draft by-law be approved, updating Policy F110, the Use of Corporate Resources for Municipal Elections policy. Staff Contact: June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk, 905-623-3379 ext. 2102 or jgallagher@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Proposed updated "Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Policy" Attachment 2 — Draft By-law repealing By-law 2018-028, adopting new Policy F110 Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 442 Attachment 1 to Report LGS-027-21 Corporate Policy If this information is required in an alternate format, Leading the Way please contact the Accessibility Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 POLICY TYPE: Operational SUBSECTION: POLICY TITLE: Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes POLICY #: F110 POLICY APPROVED BY: Council EFFECTIVE DATE: April 9, 2018 REVISED: ??? 2021 APPLICABLE TO: All Employees, Candidates, Registered Third Parties, Council, Clarington Local Boards Policy Statement The Municipal Elections Act (MEA), the Election Finances Act (Ontario), and the Canada Elections Act prohibit the Municipality from making contributions in any form to a Candidate or Registered Third Party. All provisions contained within this policy shall serve to ensure the protection of freedom of expression while maintaining that: • Corporate Resources shall not be used during an Election Period to promote or provide an unfair advantage to any Candidate, political party, constituency association, Registered Third Party, or a person or group supporting or opposing a question on a ballot; • Members of Council shall not be precluded from performing their duties as an elected Official, nor inhibited them representing the interests of their constituents; and, • Information and communication related to an election shall continue to be open and accessible to the public with content towW be produced, and approved, by Clarinaton's Coraorate Communications Division. in coniunction with the Clerk's Division. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to create guidelines in the Municipality of Clarington for all Candidates running for an elected office and Registered Third Parties during the Election Period and to establish parameters on the use of Corporate Resources for election related purposes. F110 — Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Page 1 of 8 Page 443 Policy F110 Scope This policy applies to all employees of the Municipality, Candidates, political parties, constituency associations, Registered Third Parties, and persons or groups supporting or opposing a question on a ballot, as well as anyone acting on their behalf. Index 1 Definitions 3 2 Responsibilities 4 3 General Provisions 4 4 Corporate Resources - Technology 5 5 Corporate Resources - Communications 5 6 Corporate Resources - Municipality Facilities 7 7 Municipality Staff 8 8 Integrity Commissioner 8 1 Definitions 1.1 Campaign(ing) means any activity by, or on behalf of a Candidate, political party, constituency association, Registered Third Party, or question on a ballot meant to elicit support during the Election Period. This does not include the appearance of elected officials, other candidates or their supporters, or registrants at an event in their personal capacity without the display of any signage or graphics which identif+esy the individual as a candidate or registrant ap,d-without the solicitation of votes. 1.2 Campaign Materials means any materials used to solicit votes for a Candidate(s) or question during the Election Period including, but not limited to, literature, banners, posters, pictures, buttons, clothing, or other paraphernalia. Campaign Materials include materials in all media, for example, print, displays, electronic radio or television, online including websites or social media. 1.3 Candidate means any person who has filed, and not withdrawn a nomination, in a municipal, school board, provincial or federal election or by-election, or a candidate seeking nomination for a political party. Where referred to in this Policy, the term Candidate can also be substituted to read political party, constituency association, Registered Third Party, or a person or group supporting or opposing a question on a ballot. 1.4 Corporate Resource means items, staff, services, or resources which are the property of the Municipality of Clarington including, but not limited to: materials, equipment, vehicles, facilities, land, technology (computers, smartphones, tablets, etc.), intellectual property, images, logos, and supplies. Working hours, the time where the Municipality pays its employees to complete certain duties or tasks, is also considered to be a Corporate Resource. F110 — Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Page 2 of 8 Page 444 Policy F110 1.5 Election Period means the official Campaign period of an election for: • A municipal or school board election; the Election Period commences on the first day prescribed for the filing of nominations in accordance with the MEA and ends on voting day. • A provincial or federal election; the Election Period commences the day the writ for the election is issued and ends on voting day. • A nomination for a political party, the Election Period is the nomination contesting period as determined by the Party. • A question on the ballot; the period commences the day Council passes a by-law to put a question to the electorate and ends on voting day. • A municipal or school board by-election; the period commences wheR the by eeleGti„n is Galle don the first day nominations may be filed and ends on voting day. 1.6 Local Board moons o hollye i imnininol seNino board, eF IOGal of therity established by the M inininolity of GloriRgtenhas the same meaning as found in Section 1 of the Municipal Act, 2001. 1.7 MEA means the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, as amended, S.O. 1996, c. 32, Sched. 1.8 Municipal Facility/Building means any building or facility owned or operated by the Municipality of Clarington or Clarington local board. 1.9 Registered Third Party shall have the same meaning as "Registered Third Party" Under the as found in section of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 or the term "Third Party" WRder theas defined in section 1 of the Election Finances Act (Ontario) and Canada Elections Act, as the context requires. 2 Responsibilities 2.1 Candidates and Registered Third Parties to: • Adhere to the guidelines and parameters established by this policy. 2.2 Municipal Clerk to: • Administer this policy and provide any related procedures as deemed necessary or desirable for conducting an election. 2.3 Municipal Staff to: • Ensure that Corporate Resources, as identified by this Policy, are not used for campaigning. F110 — Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Page 3 of 8 Page 445 Policy F110 3 General Provisions In Accordance with the spirit and intent of the election related legislation, 3.1 Corporate Resources and funding shall not be used by a Candidate or Registered Third Party for Campaigning or election -related purposeg the Glen+inn Period! 3.2 The tenets of this Policy also apply to an acclaimed Member or a Member not seeking re-election. 3.3 The Municipal Clerk be authorized, and directed to take the necessary action, to give effect to this Policy. 3.4 This Policy does not preclude a Member of Council from performing their duties as a Councillor, nor inhibit them from representing the interests of their constituents. 3.5 Individuals who have questions about this Policy are encouraged to contact the Municipal Clerk to obtain further clarification. 4 Corporate Resources — Technology Further to Section 3.1 above, the following is provided for greater clarity when considering the use of corporate technology resources: 4.1 Members of Council are provided access to corporate information technology (I.T.) assets to fulfill their duties and responsibilities as an elected official but may not use those assets for Campaigning or the development of Campaign Materials. This includes, but is not limited to, functionality through municipally issued smartphones such as calendar, email, texts, etc. 4.2 Websites or domain names that are funded by the Municipality of Clarington may not be used for campaigning. The Municipality's official election website or webpages will provide Candidate contact information, including a link to a Candidate's website, but shall in no way endorse any Candidate. Notwithstanding, a Member of CouncilCandidate or Third Party Advertiser may: • Gandidates may provide a link to the Municipality's official election website or webpages in their campaign materials OR erder for electors to access additional information about the election and voting process. F110 — Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Page 4 of 8 Page 446 Policy F110 Once a Member of Council registers to be a Candidate, any links from a Municipal website or social media account to his or her website or social media pages will be removed from the Municipality's webpages if the Member's website or social media page contains or will contain Campaign Material. Notwithstanding, information contained on the "Personal Information Release Form - Candidate Consent", as part of the nomination process, may be included on the Clarington Elections webpage(s). 4.3 in an e'eGtien yearDuring the election period, Mayor and Council biographies on the Municipal website shall remain statin and ne shaRgGG W those paves Will he perm be reduced to council -related contact information only. The Municipality's voicemail system shall not be used by Candidates to record campaign -related messages nor shall the computer network, including the email system, be used to distribute campaign -related correspondence. 5 Corporate Resources - Communications Further to Section 3.1 above, the following is provided for greater clarity when considering the use of corporate communication resources: 5.1 Members of Council may not use Council portraits funded by the Municipality, either as a corporate or Member expense, in Campaign Materials. 5.2 Photographs produced for, and owned by, the Municipality may not be used for any election purposes. 5.3 Candidates or Registered Third Parties may not print, distribute, or make reference to any of the Municipality's email addresses, telephone numbers, or facility addresses on any Campaign Materials. Notwithstanding, Candidates or Registered Third Parties may: • provide the election telephone number, election email address, or a link to the Municipality's official election websitez er webpages in Campaign Materials for electors to access additional information about the election and voting process (see also Section 4.2); and 5.4 The Clerk may develop and distribute information through various means for the purpose of advising and educating electors. Candidates or Registered Third Parties are permitted to promote and distribute election information provided by the Clerk, provided that such information is not modified in any way. F110 — Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Page 5 of 8 Page 447 Policy F110 5.5 The Municipality's logo, crest, coat of arms, and slogans, or any other images or illustrations or videos owned or under the jurisdiction of the Municipality, may not be used in any campaign materials. As per the Use of Corporate Logo by Members of Council Policy (see Report COD-030-11), the logo or any related material shall not be available for use as of January 1 st in an election year. Notwithstanding, Candidates or Registered Third Parties may: • Capture their own photos of Municipal property for use in campaign material, provided the photo is taken from a publicly accessible area, and does not contain a Municipal sign, logo, crest, coat of arms or slogan in the background. 5.6 Distribution lists or contact lists developed utilizing Corporate Resources and in the custody and control of the Municipality shall not be utilized for election purposes. 5.7 The following shall be discontinued for Members of Council from the day prior to Nomination Day in a municipal election year to Voting Day, • All printing, high speed photocopying and distribution, including printing and general distribution of newsletters unless so directed and approved by Council, and • The ordering of business cards and stationery. 5.8 Members of Council may not, • Print, post or distribute any material paid by municipal funds that illustrates that a Member of Council or any other individual is registered in any election or where they will be running for office, • Profile (name or photograph), or make reference to, in any material paid by municipal funds, any individual who is registered as a candidate in any election, • Print or distribute any material using municipal funds that makes reference to, or contains the names or photographs, or identifies registered candidates for municipal elections (minutes of Municipal Council and Committee meetings are exempt from this policy). 5.9 Municipal resources that have been published to the Municipal website (e.g., strategic plans, staff reports, minutes, agendas, press releases) may be linked to Candidate and Registered Third Parties' websites, but may not be housed on the candidate website, and may not beer taken out of context/modified/reproduced for use in any campaign related material. F110 — Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Page 6 of 8 Page 448 Policy F110 5.10 Messages posted to the Municipal social media accounts (including Facebook and Twitter) may be shared in the case of Facebook or re -tweeted on Twitter by a candidate to their personal or campaign social media accounts using social media official channels and not partially reproduced. 6 Corporate Resources - Municipality Facilities/Buildings Further to Section 3.1 above, the following is provided for greater clarity when considering the use of Municipal Facilities/Buildings, including Municipality owned or leased lands, as corporate resources: 6.1 Any Candidate may attend any public Standing Committee, Advisory Committee or Council meeting; however, they shall not use this forum to speak on, or address, any matter relating to their Campaign. 6.2 Candidates or Registered Third Parties are prohibited from renting space (e.g., a booth) as part of a Municipally organized event. 6.3 All Candidates and Registered Third Parties must adhere to the provisions set out in any other Municipal Policies pertaining to Municipal Facilities/Buildings. 6.4 Members of Council, Registered Third Parties, and Candidates may not use their constituency office, municipal or any municipally provided facilities for any election -related purpose, which includes the display of any campaign -related signs in the window or on the premises, as well as the display of election - related material in the office. 6.5 Campaigning and the distribution or display of campaign material is not permitted in any municipal or local board facility, on municipal land, or at municipal or local board event including any municipal or board meeting. 6.6 Candidates or Registered Third Parties are prohibited from using a Municipal Facility/Building as a campaign office. 6.7 The rental, to candidates or Registered Third Parties of advertising space on arena boards and lobby monitors, or any other municipal social media site, is prohibited. Notwithstanding, • Section 6.5 does not prohibit the erection of a temporary election or campaign signs on municipal land in accordance with the Municipality's Election Sign By-law. • Campaigning on public sidewalks and highways is permitted, provided that S Gh „ani- n;n^it is in compliance with prevailing legislation and Municipal by-laws. • Sections 6.4 and 6.5 do not prohibit a candidate or external organization or Registered Third Party rom renting space within a municipal facility/building (other than the Municipal Administrative Centre, Clarington F110 — Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Page 7 of 8 Page 449 Policy F110 Library facilities and the Museum Buildings) for election related purposes. af,d-If a municipal facility / building is rented, campaigning and the distribution or display of campaign materials is only permitted, Only during the rental period and only within the rented area, ^�mn�inninn +ho distribution or display of Garnpainn materi_ . This exception does not apply to Section 6.6. Vehicle and/or mobile signs may be displayed as per the Municipality's Election Sign By-law. 7 Municipality Staff 7.1 In accordance with the Policy E1 - Employee Code of Ethics, Municipal Staff are prohibited from using corporate resources for the benefit of a Candidate or Campaign. Policy E1 also sets out the rules for participation in political activities by staff. 8 Integrity Commissioner 8.1 The Municipality's appointed Integrity Commissioner is considered to be a Corporate Resource, under contract with the Municipality and may receive, from time to time, compensation from the Municipality in accordance with services provided. 8.2 Members of Council shall not use the services of the Municipality's Integrity Commissioner during the Election Period for the purposes of seeking advice related to their Campaign. 9 Limitation 9.1 Nothing in this Policy shall prohibit a Member of Council from performing their job as a Councillor, nor inhibit them from representing the interests of the constituents who elected them. All tenets of this policy are subject to the exception of Members' actions associated with fulfilling their normal and ongoing representative roles as Members of Council (such as attending annual or regular scheduled events, up until the official end of the term they are serving. F110 — Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Page 8 of 8 Page 450 Attachment 2 to Report LGS-027-21 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By -Law No. 2021-xxx Being a By-law to adopt the Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Policy, and Repeal By-law 2018-028. Whereas Sub -section 88.18 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, as amended, (the Act) states that, before May 1 in the year of a regular election, municipalities and local boards shall establish rules and procedures with respect to the use of municipal or board resources, as the case may be, during the election campaign period; Whereas Sub -section 88.15 (1) of the Act states that money, goods and services given to and accepted by a person for his or her election campaign, or given to and accepted by another person who is acting under the person's direction, are contributions; Whereas Section 88.8 (4) 5 of the Act states that a municipality or local board states that a municipality or local board shall not make a contribution to the election campaign of a candidate; Whereas Council had previously passed By-law 2018-028 adopting the "Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Policy"; and Whereas the Council of the Municipality of Clarington deems it necessary to update the "Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes Policy". Now Therefore the Council of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: That the attached Policy Statement in respect to Use of Corporate Resources for Election Purposes be adopted to replace the Policy Statement forming part of By- law 2018-028. 2. That Attachment 1, Policy F110, forms part of this By-law. 3. That By-law 2018-028 be repealed. 4. This by-law shall come into force and effect on the date of passing. Passed in Open Council this 9th day of April, 2018. Adrian Foster, Mayor C. Anne Greentree, Municipal Clerk Page 451 Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Joint Committees Date of Meeting: October 25, 2021 Report Number: LGS-028-21 Submitted By: Rob Maciver, Director of Legislative Services Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: N/A File Number: L1000-35 By-law Number: 97-77 Report Subject: Additional Dwelling Unit Registration By-law Recommendations: 1. That Report LGS-028-21 and any related communication items, be received; and 2. That the By-law included as Attachment 1 to Report LGS-028-21, be approved. Page 452 Municipality of Clarington Report LGS-028-21 Report Overview Page 2 This Report recommends approval of an Additional Dwelling Unit Registration By-law to replace the older Apartment -in -House By-law. This replacement by-law is recommended to support and compliment the affordable housing proposals found in Report PDS-055-21. 1. Background 1.1 The Planning and Development Services Department has been working on an initiative to update Clarington's higher order land use planning instruments to provide for more affordable housing opportunities in the form of additional dwelling units (i.e. additional residential units within existing homes). The recommendations arising out of this initiative are contained in Report PDS-055-21. 1.2 The Apartment -in -House By-law 97-77 was enacted by the Municipality in 1997 to provide for a registration process for property owners with legal secondary apartments. The purpose of registration is to ensure that the registered dwelling units are safe, in that they comply with the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and the Ontario Fire Code, in addition to local zoning by-laws. 1.3 As a result of the recommendations found in Report PDS-055-21, the Planning and Development Services Department has requested that By-law 97-77 be updated support and compliment the related changes to Clarington's planning documents 2. Additional Dwelling Unit Registration By-law 2.1 A draft by-law entitled the "Additional Dwelling Unit Registration By-law" is included as Attachment 1 of this Report. This new by-law is proposed as a replacement for the Apartment -in -House By-law that has become obsolete in some of its terminology. The draft by-law is essentially the same in substance as the older by-law and would continue to require property owners to register their additional dwelling units with the Municipality, and to confirm that these units comply with safety and zoning standards. 2.2 Replacing By-law 97-77 with the attached draft by-law will maintain a consistency between the proposed zoning by-law provisions that relate to additional dwelling units, and the requirement to register these units with the Municipality. Without this change, there will be a misalignment between the zoning by-law and the registration by-law that would compromise the effectiveness of the registration process. Page 453 Municipality of Clarington Report LGS-028-21 Concurrence Page 3 This report has been reviewed by the Director of Planning and Development Services who concurs with the recommendations. 3. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that Council enact the draft by-law included as Attachment 1 of this Report to replace the outdated By-law 97-77. Staff Contact: Rob Maciver, Director of Legislative Services/Municipal Solicitor, 905-623-3379 ext. 2013 or rmaciver@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Draft Additional Dwelling Unit Registration By-law Attachment 2 — Draft Set Fine Schedule Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 454 Attachment 1 to Report LGS-028-21 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-law 2021-XXX Being a By-law to license and regulate additional dwelling units in the Municipality of Clarington. WHEREAS Subsection 11(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended (the "Act"), provides that the Municipality may pass by-laws for the health, safety and well-being of Persons; AND WHEREAS Subsection 8(3) of the Act authorizes the Municipality to enact a by- law that provides for a system of licences in respect of a matter; AND WHEREAS Section 151 of the Act provides that the Municipality may provide for a system of licences with respect to a business, or to any activity, matter or thing; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington has determined that it is appropriate and desirable to license Additional Dwelling Units for the purpose of ensuring the health, safety and well-being of Persons; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington hereby enacts as follows: DEFINITIONS In this by-law, "Additional Dwelling Unit" means a self-contained dwelling unit located within a permitted residential dwelling or an accessory building secondary to the principal residential building on the same lot; "Director" means the Director of Planning and Development Services or his/her designate; "Enforcement Officer" means a Provincial Offences Officer as defined under the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.33; "Municipality" means The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, or its geographical area as the context requires; "Owner" means the registered owner of the property on which an Additional Dwelling Unit is situated; "Person" means an individual or a corporation, and "Persons" has a corresponding meaning; Page 455 "Registration" means a registration approved under this By-law; "Registrant" means an Owner in possession of a Registration approved in accordance with this By-law; APPLICATION OF BY-LAW 2. The provisions of this By-law apply to every Owner within the Municipality. PROHIBITIONS 3. Every Owner shall obtain a Registration for an Additional Dwelling Unit in accordance with this By-law. REGISTRATION 4. Every application for a Registration shall be completed and submitted in the form established by the Director and shall be accompanied by the application fee established by the Municipality. 5. The Director shall approve a Registration for an Owner provided that the Additional Dwelling Unit meets the following conditions: (a) compliance with the current zoning by-laws of the Municipality; (b) compliance with the Ontario Fire Code where applicable; and (c) compliance with the Ontario Building Code where applicable. 6. A Registration is valid from the date of issuance until cancelled or revoked. 7. The Director may cancel or revoke a Registration if it was issued in error, based on false information, if the Registrant fails to comply with any provision of this By- law, or if the Additional Dwelling Unit is no longer in existence. ENFORCEMENT 8. Where any Person contravenes any provision of this By-law, an Enforcement Officer may direct such Person to comply with this By-law. Every Person so directed shall comply with such direction without delay. Page 456 POWERS OF ENTRY 9. An Enforcement Officer, whether alone or accompanied by an individual possessing special or expert knowledge or skills, may enter on land that is occupied by a Person who requires a Registration under this By-law at any reasonable time for the purpose of carrying out an inspection to determine whether or not the following are being complied with: (a) this By-law; (b) a direction or order of the Municipality made under the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 or this By-law; or (c) an order made under section 431 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25. 10. For the purposes of an inspection under this By-law, an Enforcement Officer may: (a) require the production for inspection of documents or things relevant to the inspection; (b) inspect and remove documents or things relevant to the inspection for the purpose of making copies or extracts; (c) require information from any person concerning a matter related to the inspection; and (d) alone or in conjunction with a person possessing special or expert knowledge, make examinations or take tests, samples or photographs necessary for the purposes of the inspection. 11. In addition to any other provision of this By-law, and subject to the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, a provincial judge or justice of the peace may issue an order authorizing the Municipality to enter on land, including a room or place actually being used as a dwelling, for the purpose of carrying out an inspection to determine whether or not the following are being complied with: (d) this By-law; (e) a direction or order of the Municipality made under the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 or this By-law; or (f) an order made under section 431 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25. Page 457 OBSTRUCTION 12. No Person shall hinder or obstruct, or attempt to hinder or obstruct, an Enforcement Officer from lawfully carrying out a power, duty or direction under this By-law. OFFENCES 13. Every Person, other than a corporation who contravenes any provision of this By- law, is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable, for every occurrence, day or part thereof upon which such offence occurs or continues, to a fine of not more than $10,000 for a first offence; and not more than $25,000 for any subsequent conviction. 14. Every corporation which contravenes any provision of this By-law, is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable, for every occurrence, day or part thereof upon which such offence occurs or continues, to a fine of not more than $50,000 for a first offence, and not more than $100,000 for any subsequent conviction. 15. Without limiting any other section of this By-law, every Person who contravenes any provision of this By-law is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine in accordance with the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.33. 16. If any Person is in contravention of any provision of this By-law, and the contravention has not been corrected, the contravention of the provision shall be deemed to be a continuing offence for each day or part of a day that the contravention remains uncorrected. 17. Where any Person contravenes any provision of this By-law, such Person shall be responsible for all costs incurred by the Municipality directly related to the contravention. SEVERABILITY 18. If any section or sections of this By-law, or parts thereof are found by any court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal or beyond the power of the Municipal Council to enact, such section or sections or parts thereof shall be deemed to be severable from this By-law and all remaining sections or parts of this By-law shall be deemed to be separate and independent therefrom and to be properly enacted and to be of full force and effect. CONFLICT 19. In the event of a conflict between any provision of this By-law and any applicable Act or regulation, the provision that is the most restrictive prevails. Page 458 SCHEDULES 20. The following Schedules are attached to and form an integral part of this By-law: • Schedule "A" — Set Fines EFFECTIVE DATE 21. This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date it is enacted. 22. By-law 97-77, as amended, is repealed on the date this By-law comes into force and effect. SHORT TITLE 23. This by-law may be referred to as the "Additional Dwelling Unit Registration By- law". Passed in Open Council this XX day of XXXX, 2021. Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk Page 459 Attachment 2 to Report LGS-028-21 Schedule "A" MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON PART I Provincial Offences Act By-law #2021-OXX: Additional Dwelling Unit Registration By-law ITEM COLUMN 1 COLUMN 2 COLUMN 3 Short Form Wording Provision creating Set Fine or defining offence 1 Fail to obtain Registration for Additional s. 3 $250.00 Dwelling Unit 2 Fail to comply with an order s. 8 $250.00 3 Hinder/obstruct or attempt to s. 12 $250.00 hinder/obstruct "NOTE: The penalty provision for the offences indicated above is section 15 of by-law no. 2021-OXX, a certified copy of which has been filed". Page 460 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON JOINT COMMITTEE Resolution # DATE: October 25, 2021 MOVED BY: Councillor Traill SECONDED BY: That all candidate applications for the Samuel Wilmot Nature Area Advisory Committee shall be disclosed to all members of the Board as part of the application process, upon consent of the candidate. Page 461 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON JOINT COMMITTEE Resolution # DATE: October 25, 2021 MOVED BY: Councillor Corinna Traill SECONDED BY: Councillor Granville Anderson WHEREAS while negotiations and the Official Plan Amendment proceed, trespassing continues at the Jury Lands site; WHEREAS vehicular and All -Terrain Vehicle access to the site are causing damage; WHEREAS the Jury Lands Foundation believes that ditch within the municipal road allowance along Lambs Road and a berm constructed with material from the ditch will stop vehicular and ATV access to the site, and discourage trespassing from this boundary; and WHEREAS Clarington Council wishes to take any and all steps to preserve the integrity of the Jury Lands site pending a final resolution of the outstanding issues with the owners; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT 1. The Jury Lands Foundation requests that Staff will immediately clear the ditch of debris along Lamb's Road and that the clearance be prioritized; 2. The cost of enhancing the existing ditch along Lambs Road within the municipal road allowance and construction of a berm with materials extracted from the ditch be referred to the 2022 budget; and 3. The cost of placing boulders to prevent vehicular access also be referred to the 2022 budget Page 462 4 �, • V t +p `� It Err r �I r�lb � " y ► *iMlr p �I TY�4 ++-MM.11 Will i�� NEI t71 MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON JOINT COMMITTEE Resolution # DATE: October 25, 2021 MOVED BY: Councillor Traill SECONDED BY: That all Recreational Vehicle Storage By-law matters be stayed pending a final determination by Council on the legitimacy of Recreational Vehicle Storage businesses in Clarington. Page 466 Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Joint Committees Date of Meeting: October 25, 2021 Report Number: FSD-049-21 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Director of Financial Services/Treasurer Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: File Number: [If applicable, enter File Number] By-law Number: Report Subject: Roadmap for Community Board Sustainability Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-049-21 and any related communication items, be received; 2. That Staff work with the hall and arena boards to determine the preferred structure of a Municipal Services Board or a Municipal Facility and bring back to Council the appropriate by-laws; 3. That Staff include in the 2022 budget for consideration the costs to fund, and if necessary, procure, winter control, grass-cutting/garden maintenance, pest control and waste management services at the hall and arena boards; 4. That Council approves in principle the four -step roadmap for Community Board Sustainability; and 5. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-049-21 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 467 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-049-21 Report Overview Page 2 Community Hall and Arena Boards provide a valuable service to the communities in which they serve in the Municipality of Clarington. The volunteers at these facilities provide a social benefit to local residents through the organization of events, hall rentals and community outreach; however, the long-term sustainability of the boards has been impacted by COVID- 19, changing demographics and increased operating costs. This report provides a roadmap for continued sustainability recognizing that each board is in a different position and may have unique needs to address. The four -step roadmap provides clarity in direction, treatment and funding for the boards and is meant as a guide to the relationship between the Municipality and the community partners that work with the facilities. 1. Background Request from Council for Sustainability Plan 1.1 At its meeting of March 29, 2021, General Government Committee passed Resolution GG-273-21 which directed Staff to report back on eligibility for hall boards to apply for one-time funding related to ongoing COVID-19 needs and that Staff report back on long- term funding options for hall boards with respect to ongoing snow removal, utilities, and maintenance, where the hall boards may be struggling financially, in order to ensure the long-term viability of the local boards. 1.2 At its meeting of May 10, 2021, General Government Committee approved Resolution GG-360-21 approving an in -take for the Community COVID-19 Support Program of $60,000 in funding for hall and arena boards. 1.3 At its meeting of October 19, 2021, Council approved funding from the Province's COVID-19 Recovery Fund to be utilized to support the costs of screeners/vaccine verification at the hall and arena boards. Council also supported providing funding to the boards for the 2021/2022 winter season to pay for, or have the Municipality arrange, snow clearing at the facilities. 1.4 This report relates to the long-term sustainability of the local hall and arena boards in Clarington. Current Relationship with Community Partners for Facilities 1.5 The current relationship with the hall and arena boards started with Report TR-74-89 and the addendum that, in compliance with the Municipal Act in effect at the time, Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-049-21 Page 3 dissolved the local recreation and community boards except for the Orono Arena, Newcastle Arena and the Newcastle Community Hall. 1.6 The boards which were dissolved were allowed to operate in a similar fashion to which they were historically; however, there was no longer a requirement to submit their records for consolidation with the Town of Newcastle (now Municipality of Clarington). 1.7 The Beech Centre was created as a community recreation centre in 2001 with Report FND-011-01. There was an executed Memorandum of Understanding with the Clarington Older Adult Association and a surrender of the lease. Subsequently, in 2015, Report LGL-009-15 recommended the designation of the Beech Centre as a municipal capital facility and an agreement with the Bowmanville Older Adults Association was approved. 1.8 In 2008, the Clerk's Department brought Report CLD-010-08 regarding Municipal Services Boards. As a result of the report, five by-laws were passed by Council establishing separate Municipal Service Boards under section 196 of the Municipal Act, 2001. 1.9 By-law 2008-036 established a Municipal Service Board to operate the Orono Arena and repeal By-law 78-63. In 2017, the Orono Arena Board was dissolved, and operations taken over by the Orono Amateur Athletic Association (OAAA), see paragraph 1.13 below. 1.10 By-law 2008-037 established a Municipal Service Board to operate the Newcastle Arena and repealed By-law 79-13 (which as noted in paragraph 1.5, the Newcastle Arena Board had not been dissolved in 1989). 1.11 By-law 2008-038 established a Municipal Service Board to operate a Community Hall in Solina (the Solina Community Hall) and repeal By-law 83-28. 1.12 By-law 2008-039 established a Municipal Services Board to operate a Community Hall in Tyrone and repeal By-law 97-62. 1.13 In 2017, Report LGL-007-17 recommended that the Orono Arena and Community Centre Board be dissolved, and the Municipality entered into a Municipal Capital Facility Agreement with the Orono Amateur Athletic Association. By-law 2017-054 designated the Orono Arena and Community Centre as a municipal capital facility. Page 469 Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FSD-049-21 1.14 The following table outlines the hall boards and arena boards within the Municipality By-law 99-28 2008-037 (CLD-010-08) Page 470 Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report FSD-049-21 Board of 71,700 2014-094 (LGL-008-14) Council Community 5,000 Partner Municipal 0 2017-054 (LGL-007-17) Capital Facility Community 3,000 Partner Board of 3,000 2008-038 Council Board of 3,000 2008-039 Council Community 219,366 Partner 1.15 The Municipality also provides grass -cutting services to Kendal Community Hall, Hampton Community Hall, Newcastle Village Community Hall, and Tyrone Community Centre. Waste removal and snow removal services are also provided to the Hampton Community Hall. Page 471 Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report FSD-049-21 2. Operating Options Per the Legislation Municipal Services Board 2.1 The Municipal Act, 2001 section 198 states that a municipality may give a municipal service board the control and management of such services and activities as the municipality considers appropriate and shall do so by delegating the power and duties of the municipality to the board in accordance with the Act. 2.2 A municipal service board is considered a local board for the purposes of the Act and must follow the Municipal Act, 2001. The Municipality consolidates the activities (revenues and expenses), assets and liabilities of the board into its financial statements. 2.3 This option would result in a Board of Council, requiring council appointed members. The Boards are also subject to the requirements of the Municipal Act, 2001 regarding meetings, minutes, and regulatory policies. The facilities would not be subject to property taxation. Municipal Capital Facility 2.4 A municipality may enter into an agreement for the provision of municipal capital facilities by any person, including another municipality, if the agreement provides for one of the following: a. Lease payments in foreign currencies b. Assistance is provided by the municipality c. Tax exemptions d. Development Charges exemptions 2.5 Under an MCF, a municipality may provide financial or other assistance despite the "bonusing rules" in section 106, they may also exempt from property taxes or exempt from development charges. 2.6 Ontario regulation 603/06 outlines which properties may be eligible for a municipal capital facility agreement. Under section 2 of the regulations, municipal community centres are an eligible facility as are municipal facilities used for cultural, recreation or tourist purposes. The hall boards and arena boards could be considered community centres, as well as recreation centres and are therefore eligible for this type of agreement. Page 472 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-049-21 Page 7 2.7 The Municipality may enter into an agreement with an individual or an organization to provide the services that would be offered by Clarington, in these facilities. There would be no requirement for Council representation and the boards of directors of these organizations are independent of the Municipality. 2.8 In the existing cases, the Municipality of Clarington has agreements with established not -for -profit organizations that have been incorporated. While it is possible to enter into an agreement with an individual, it is more common to enter into agreements with an incorporated organization. 2.9 An example of this relationship is the BOAA. The Beech Centre is owned by the Municipality but the services, which are open to the public and are services otherwise offered by the Municipality, are organized by the BOAA in that location. The Beech Centre is considered tax exempt. Municipal Operations 2.10 The Municipality could oversee the operations of the facilities as a municipal service. Given the facility and likely services offered, it would likely become part of the Community Services Department. 2.11 As the Municipality is property tax exempt, if the facilities were operated by the Municipality there would be no property tax charged by the Municipality, the Region of Durham, or the school boards, for example, the Diane Hamre Recreation Complex. Tenant Relationship 2.12 It could be argued that any relationship other than those identified above is a lease agreement with an organization. These relationships are independent of Council and the Municipality. 2.13 As this type of relationship is a commercial activity, the properties could be subject to property tax. Property tax would be borne by the Municipality, which would include the payment to the Region and the School Boards (the local portion is net zero). 2.14 It is staff's recommendation that an independent tenant relationship should be avoided as these add additional costs to operate the facility and have the lowest level of integration with the Municipality. Page 473 Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report FSD-049-21 3. Factors Impacting Financial Sustainability COVID-19 Factors 3.1 During COVID-19, certain Federal and Provincial supports did not include local boards in their eligibility, including the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy and several loan programs guaranteed by the Federal Government. 3.2 The inconsistency of treatment of the facility boards meant that some boards were eligible (the Orono Amateur Athletic Association) while others were not (the Newcastle Memorial Arena Board) because of the type of relationship with the Municipality. This is true of the hall boards as well. 3.3 Throughout 2020 and 2021, the public health actions taken by the Province of Ontario to restrict the spread of COVID-19 had a drastic impact on the ability of arena and hall boards to earn revenue. Facility rentals, such as weddings, ice rentals, meetings and community events were brought to a drastic halt. While revenues decreased, there are still fixed costs of operating a facility including utilities, insurance, repairs and maintenance, winter control, grass -cutting, and pest control. Not only does it impact the current year, but the shortage has an impact on long-term plans that the boards may have. 3.4 Financial impacts for COVID-19 are not just related to lost revenue during lockdowns. When facilities re -open there are additional costs for cleaning, screening/vaccine verification, and added costs overall, because of changes to the supply chain. Further, many hall boards are expecting decreased demand for bookings due to continued public hesitancy, capacity limitations and potentially added costs for COVID-19 cleaning. Reliance on Volunteers 3.5 The Boards are dependent on volunteers for their operations and governance. The shape of volunteerism in Canada is changing. A Statistics Canada report in June 2020 (https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n 1 /pub/45-28-0001 /2020001 /article/00037-eng.htm) indicated while the percentage of volunteerism is similar across the iGen to Baby Boomer generations (born after 1946) at approximately 77 per cent, the hours contributed by Baby Boomers (born 1946 to 1965) averaged 197 volunteer hours compared to 121 hours by Millennials (1981 to 1995) and 99 hours by iGen (1996 to present). This statistic shows the decreasing number of available hours for volunteers. 3.6 It should be noted that the same study indicated that while "Matures" (born 1918 to 1945) averaged 176 hours per year, approximately 20 hours less than Baby Boomers, only 58 per cent of that population was involved in volunteering. The decreasing hours, and the lower number of individuals volunteering in the older groups, will have an impact on the ability of hall boards to continue operating. Page 474 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-049-21 Page 9 3.7 Without volunteers, the boards could see rising costs as part-time staff are added in order to maintain the facility or there could be decreased programming and events at the community halls. Eventually, lack of volunteers could result in the cessation of service. 4. Roadmap to Financial Sustainability 4.1 Staff are recommending that financial sustainability of the community facilities should be on a continuum based on the needs of the individual facility. This recognizes that some boards are in different positions and Staff do not want to negatively impact the current operations of hall boards that are functioning efficiently. Staff always want to respect the valuable work and service that the volunteers of these organizations have provided; therefore, rather than a simple "on/off" switch, it is proposed that sustainability occur over a period of time, as the situation evolves. 4.2 The proposed roadmap includes four steps moving towards the ultimate step of Municipal assumption of service delivery at the facilities. Standardize Agreements Assume Repairs and Maintenance Assume Service Delivery Close Facility Step 1 — Standardized Agreements and Treatment of Facilities 4.3 As noted above, the community facilities are established in multiple ways. The first step is to standardize the relationship with the community and hall boards. This first step may see the adoption of additional municipal service boards or the creation of additional municipal capital facilities. There are advantages and disadvantages to either of these Page 475 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-049-21 Page 10 relationships. It is suggested that Staff work with the hall boards to determine an ideal relationship going forward. Council is required to pass by-laws to establish municipal service boards or designate municipal capital facilities, therefore Council will be involved in the determination of the relationship once Staff are able to work with the organizations to determine the best process for the future. It is possible that the Municipality is best served through a combination of the two relationships this is also possible; however, it is important that one or the other be established to avoid property taxation issues. 4.4 Within the current three classes of relationships (Municipal Service Board, Municipal Capital Facility, independent), there are inconsistencies as to what the terms of the agreement, if any exist, are. Staff are suggesting, standardizing the agreements for all the boards so that terms of operations are consistent. 4.5 The Municipality, in some cases has to pay for space at the hall boards, even though we own the building. The Municipality often pays rental fees for this space. It is suggested that part of the agreement will include a requirement to provide to the Municipality, an agreed to number of hours for our use at no cost to the Municipality. This will address a concern that some members of Council have expressed regarding community programming and events at the hall boards. Municipal events such as elections could also be held at the halls, we currently pay some boards to use the facility for these purposes. As most of this programming would be during the week, the impact on the wedding/party rentals should be minimal. 4.6 The agreements will also standardize the areas of responsibility between the board and the Municipality. This ensures that there is no confusion as to what parts of the building are repaired by the Municipality and what is looked after by the board. This also provides consistency, so that all the boards are treated equitably. 4.7 The recommendation would be that the Municipality is responsible for all items that form part of the building. If the building was turned upside-down, anything that stays in the building would be the responsibility of the Municipality. This clarifies that the Municipality is responsible for hot-water systems, doors, floors, plumbing. To clarify however, the Municipality would not be responsible for routine wear and tear, such as waxing the floor, touching up paint. Step 2 — Assumption of Funding Certain Services Not Related to Building 4.8 Staff are recommending the Municipality assume the responsibility for certain services, which we may be able to obtain/provide in a more efficient and consistent manner. As well, because they are municipal buildings, there is risk management reasons for assuming the delivery of the services. Page 476 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-049-21 Page 11 4.9 Staff are recommending that winter control, grass cutting, pest control, and waste removal be funded by the Municipality. This could take the form of reimbursement, or the coordination of service delivery at the facility. 4.10 Staff also belief it makes sense to assume the utilities, to ensure there are no issues with payments; Staff would recommend that the utilities are billed back to the user groups in proportion to the usage, given that some programming and hours would relate to the Municipality's usage of the facility. This would be outlined in the standardized agreements approved in Step 1. 4.11 By assuming certain responsibilities, the Municipality can alleviate these maintenance responsibilities from the volunteers and allow them to focus their time and resources on community programming and facility events. 4.12 Staff would recommend that the assumption of these services should be met by a decrease in the municipal funding level to the hall boards. It is recommended that the budget submissions from the hall boards will need to identify project specific requests, rather than general operating requests. Step 3 — Assume Service Delivery 4.13 Eventually, if the hall boards determined they were unable to continue to operate the facilities, the Community Services Department could assume the booking and programming at these facilities. These services would include facility rentals, community fitness programming, recreation programming (camps) and community development events. 4.14 As the facilities provide services and programming, like what are offered in municipally operated facilities, there should be minimal impact to transition. The building could utilize the existing staff resources for booking, Community Services could hold additional programs and outreach at the facilities, and repairs and maintenance are already a responsibility of the Municipality. Step 4 — Close Facility 4.15 As with all services and facilities that the Municipality provides, eventually the cost/benefit of providing that service or maintaining the facility could become unreasonable and a decision is made to close the facility. 4.16 It is not anticipated that any of these facilities will close in the foreseeable future; however, ultimately that is the final step on the roadmap. With changing demographics, service expectations, and finite resources, it is crucial that the Municipality regularly review its facilities and services, to ensure that they continue to be an efficient use of taxpayer resources. Page 477 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-049-21 Summary of Steps Page 12 4.17 This roadmap is a continuum, each hall and arena board will progress through these steps at different rates and to different degrees. It is expected that boards would move through Steps 1 and 2 relatively quickly. If or when a hall board transitioned to Step 3 would be through open communication with the hall board, Community Services Staff and Council. It is not expected at this time that boards would go to Step 4. 4.18 While there are two steps, Steps 1 and 2 may be done concurrently. It is possible to assume the funding for certain services while the determination of the relationship with the Municipality (Municipal Service Board vs Municipal Capital Facility) are completed. Any organization wishing to enter Step 3 right away, could avoid Steps 1 and 2. 4.19 In 2021, the Municipality provided the following funds to hall boards through the 2021 budget, this does not include the grant programs related to COVID-19: = E*W-W"= Bowmanville Older Adults Association $ 318,569 Newcastle Community Hall 71,700 Solina Community Hall 3,000 Tyrone Hall Board 3,000 Kendall Community Centre 3,000 Newtonville Community Hall 5,000 Orono Town Hall 3,000 Hampton Community Association 5,000 Brownsdale Community Hall 3,000 Page 478 Municipality of Clarington Page 13 Report FSD-049-21 4.20 It would be expected that the above funds could be reduced going forward upon the assumption of those costs, therefore the overall impact to the taxpayer would be reduced by the above amount. 5. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Director of Community Services and the Director of Public Works who concur with the recommendations. 6. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that Council approve the principles included in the report to establish a four -step roadmap for the sustainability of the community hall and arena boards. It is also recommended that Council approve the assumption for the funding of winter control, waste management, pest control and grass cutting and work with the boards to procure those services if necessary. Staff Contact: Trevor Pinn, CPA, CA, Director of Financial Services/Treasurer, 905-623-3379 ext.2602 or tpinn@clarington.net. Attachments: Not Applicable Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Community Services Department. Page 479 Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Joint Committees Date of Meeting: October 25, 2021 Report Number: FSD-046-21 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Director of Financial Services/Treasurer Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: File Number: [If applicable, enter File Number] By-law Number: Report Subject: CL2021-18 Flett Street and Parkway Avenue Reconstruction Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-046-21 and any related communication items, be received; 2. That Coco Paving Inc. with a total bid amount of $701,136.73 (net HST Rebate) being the lowest compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2021-18 be awarded the contract for the work required to complete the Flett St. and Parkway Ave. Reconstruction project; 3. That GHD Limited with a total bid amount of $38,261.76 (net HST Rebate) being the lowest compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of the PQ2019-1 roster process be awarded the contract for the contract administration and inspection portion of this project; 4. That the total funds required for this project in the amount of $830,400.00 (net HST rebate), which includes the construction cost of $701,136.73 (net HST rebate); contract administration and inspection cost of $38,261.76 (net HST rebate) and other costs such as design, material testing, and contingencies in the amount of $91,001.51 (net HST rebate) is within the approved project budget and will be funded as follows: Description Account Number Amount Parkway Ave Area Reconstruction 110-32-330-83202-7401 $285,000 Flett St. Reconstruction and Parkway Cres Sidewalk 110-36-330-83357-7401 470,000 Sidewalk Replacement 110-36-331-83215-7401 75,400 Municipality of Clarington Resort FSD-046-21 Page 2 5. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-046-21 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 481 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-046-21 Page 3 Report Overview To request authorization from Council to award the contract for the completion of the road reconstruction of Flett Street and Parkway Avenue as detailed in Tender CL2021-18. 1. Background 1.1 This project is for the reconstruction of Flett Street and Parkway Avenue in Bowmanville in addition to local area sidewalk improvements. The scope of work involves: • Reconstruction of Flett Street from Southway Drive to Parkway Crescent including storm sewer removal and replacement, subdrain installation, removal and reinstatement of road structure, curbs, driveway aprons and general area restoration. • Reconstruction of Parkway Avenue between Parkway Crescent including storm sewer removal and replacement, subdrain installation, removal and reinstatement of road structure, curbs, driveway aprons and general area restoration. • Installation of sidewalk on Parkway Avenue from Liberty Street to Parkway Crescent. • Installation of sidewalk and roadway curb on Parkway Crescent from Parkway Avenue to the frontage of St. Joseph Catholic Elementary School. Reconstruction Tender 1.2 Design and tender specifications for the road reconstruction and sidewalk improvement were prepared and provided by the Public Works Department. 1.3 Tender CL2021-18 was prepared and issued by the Purchasing Services Division. The tender was posted electronically on the Municipality's website. Notification of the availability of the document was also posted on the Ontario Public Buyers Association's website. 1.4 The tender closed on September 28, 2021. 2. Analysis 2.1 Thirty-five companies downloaded the tender document. Nine submissions were received by the stipulated closing time. One submission was received after the closing time and was deemed non -compliant. - IZA Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report FSD-046-21 2.2 The Municipality contacted the twenty-six companies who chose not to respond, to inquire as to why they chose not to submit a bid. Their responses are as follows: • One company is an association for distributing the tender document to its members; • Seven companies advised that after reviewing the document they could not take on the project due to their current workload; • Five companies advised that they downloaded the document with the interest of being a sub -contractor for the project; • Four companies advised that they downloaded the document with the interest of being a supplier for the project; and • Nine companies contacted did not respond to the Municipality's request for information. 2.3 The eight bids received prior to the closing were reviewed and tabulated by the Purchasing Services Division (see Attachment 1). All eight submissions were deemed compliant. 2.4 The bid results were forwarded to the Public Works Department for their review and consideration. 2.5 After review, analysis, and discussions it was mutually agreed by the Public Works Department and the Purchasing Services Division that the low bidder, Coco Paving Inc., be recommended for the award of Tender CL2021-18. (Attachment 2 Memo from Public Works) 2.6 Coco Paving Inc. has worked with the Municipality in the past and therefore references were not completed. Contract Administration and Material Testing 2.7 In an effort to save costs, the sidewalk installation component of the project will be executed independently from the road construction component and contract administration and inspection duties will be conducted by Public Works staff. However, due to limited staffing resources the contract administration and inspection duties of the road reconstruction component will be conducted through GHD Limited. The Public Works Department initiated the PQ2019-1 Engineering Consulting Services roster process for this assignment. 2.8 Bids were requested from the following pre -qualified Consultants of AECOM, GHD Limited and CIMA+. Page 483 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-046-21 Page 5 2.9 All three (3) Consultants submitted a bid. Each submission was higher than anticipated exceeding the $30,000 limit for roster assignments. (Refer to Attachment 2 — Bid Summary). 2.10 GHD Limited was the lowest compliant submission received. 2.11 Approval is being sought for this contract to be awarded to GHD limited as it exceeds the $30,000 threshold of the roster. The $38,261.76 (net HST rebate) is an upset limit and payment of the assignment will be conducted on a "time and material" basis. 3. Financial 3.1 The total funds required for this project in the amount of $830,400.00 (net HST rebate), which includes the construction cost of $701,136.73 (net HST rebate), contract administration and inspection cost of $38,261.76 (net HST rebate) and other costs such as design, material testing, and contingencies in the amount of $91,001.51 (net HST rebate) is within the approved project budget and will be funded as follows: Description Account Number Amount Parkway Ave Area Reconstruction 110-32-330-83202-7401 $285,000 Flett St. Reconstruction and Parkway Cres Sidewalk 110-36-330-83357-7401 470,000 Sidewalk Replacement 110-36-331-83215-7401 75,400 4. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Director of Public Works who concurs with the recommendations. 5. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that Coco Paving Inc., being the lowest compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2021-18 be awarded the contract for the work required to complete the Flett Street and Parkway Avenue Reconstruction project. It is also recommended that the GHD Limited, being the lowest compliant bidder for the roster call PQ2019-1 for contract administration and inspection be awarded the contract for this work. Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-046-21 Page 6 Staff Contact: David Ferguson, Purchasing Manager, 905-623-3379 Ext. 2209 or dferguson@claringotn.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Bid Summary Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 485 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-046-21 Attachment 1 - Bid Summary Municipality of Clarington Page 7 CL2O21-18 — Flett Street and Parkway Avenue Reconstruction Bid Summary BIDDER Total Bid (including HST) TOTAL BID (Net HST Rebate) Coco Paving Inc. $778,581.47 $701,136.73 Nick Carchidi Excavating Ltd. $916,182.92 $825,051.10 Hard -Co Construction Limited $985,783.00 $887,728.12 Dufferin Construction Co. $1,067,287.94 $961,125.85 Trisan Construction Ltd. $1,072,450.33 $965,774.74 Blackstone Paving & Construction Ltd. $1,147,915.70 $1,033,733.64 Elirpa Construction & Materials Ltd. $1,382,832.79 $1,245,283.76 New Alliance Ltd. $1,396,092.40 $1,257,224.45 Broz Excavating Non -Compliant Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report FSD-046-21 Municipality of Clarington PQ2019-1 Roster Process for Contract Administration and Inspection as required Flett Street and Parkway Avenue Reconstruction Bid Summary Project: CL2021-18 Reconstruction of Flett St. & Parkway Ave. Category: 3, General Consulting Date Received: September 29, 2021 Bids: GHD $37,600.00 AECOM $37,925.00 CIMA+ $38,746.30 Page 487 Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Joint Committees Date of Meeting: October 25, 2021 Report Number: FSD-047-21 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Director of Financial Services/Treasurer Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: File Number: CL2021-1 By-law Number: Report Subject: Toyota Trail Connection - Soper Creek Trail to Bowmanville Cemetery Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-047-21 and any related communication items, be received; 2. That CSL Group Ltd. with a total bid amount of $767,503.53 (net HST Rebate) being the lowest compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2021-1 be awarded the contract for the work required to complete the Toyota Trail Connection — Soper Creek Trail to Bowmanville Cemetery; 3. That the total funds required for this project in the amount of $930,600.00 (net HST rebate), which includes the construction cost of $767,503.53 (net HST rebate); and other costs such as survey, design, tendering, material testing, tree clearing, inspection and contract administration, permit fees and contingencies, in the amount of $163,096.47 (net HST rebate) will be funded by as follows: Description Account Number Amount Toyota Trail — Soper Creek Trail to Haines 110-32-325-83379-7401 $620,000 Various Erosion Protection Works 110-36-340-83437-7401 60,000 Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund 511-00-000-00000-7418 25,060 Development Charge — Park Development Reserve Fund 584-00-000-00000-7418 225,540 4. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-047-21 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. -�:: Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-047-21 Report Overview Page 2 To request authorization from Council to award the contract for the extension of the Toyota Trail from Soper Creek Trail to 200 m west of Haines Street as detailed in Tender CL2021-1. 1. Background 1.1 This project is for the connection of the Toyota trail from the existing Soper Creek Trail to 200 m west of Haines Street. The scope of work involves the construction of the new trail extension, benches, a pedestrian bridge along with creek bank stabilization work. 1.2 Design and tender specifications for the extension of the Toyota Trail were prepared and provided by CIMA and the Public Works Department. 1.3 Tender CL2021-1 was prepared and issued by the Purchasing Services Division. The tender was posted electronically on the Municipality's website. Notification of the availability of the document was also posted on the Ontario Public Buyers Association's website. 1.4 The tender closed on July 15, 2021. 2. Analysis 2.1 Twenty-six companies downloaded the tender document. Six submissions were received by the stipulated closing time. One submission was received after the closing time and was deemed non -compliant. 2.2 The Municipality contacted the twenty companies who chose not to respond, to inquire as to why they chose not to submit a bid. Their responses are as follows: • One company is an association for distributing the tender document to its members; • Six companies advised that after reviewing the document they could not take on the project due to their current workload; • Two companies advised that they downloaded the document with the interest of being a sub -contractor for the project; • One company advised that they downloaded the document with the interest of being a supplier for the project; and • Ten companies contacted did not respond to the Municipality's request for information. Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-047-21 Page 3 2.3 The five bids received prior to the closing were reviewed and tabulated by the Purchasing Services Division (see Attachment 1). All five submissions were deemed compliant. 2.4 The bid results were forwarded to the Public Works Department for their review and consideration. 2.5 After review, analysis, and discussions it was mutually agreed by the Public Works Department and the Purchasing Services Division that the low bidder, CSL Group Ltd be recommended for the award of Tender CL2021-1. 2.6 CSL Group Ltd. has worked with the Municipality in the past and therefore references were not checked. 3. Financial 3.1 The total funds required for this project in the amount of $930,600.00 (net HST rebate), which includes the construction cost of $ 767,503.53 (net HST rebate); and other costs such as survey, design, tendering, material testing, tree clearing, inspection and contract administration, permit fees and contingencies, in the amount of $163,096.47 (net HST rebate) and will be funded by as follows: Description Account Number Amount Toyota Trail — Soper Creek Trail to Haines 110-32-325-83379-7401 $620,000 Various Erosion Protection Works 110-36-340-83437-7401 60,000 Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund 511-00-000-00000-7418 25,060 Development Charge — Park Development Reserve Fund 584-00-000-00000-7418 225,540 3.2 Bids came in substantially higher than anticipated and as such a request is being made to utilize funding from the Municipal Capital Works Reserve Fund as well as from the Development Charge — Park Development Reserve Fund to cover the funding deficit for this project. (See Attachment 2 — Memo from Public Works re Award). 4. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Director of Public Works who concurs with the recommendations. Page 490 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-047-21 5. Conclusion Page 4 It is respectfully recommended that CSL Group Ltd., being the lowest compliant bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of Tender CL2021-1 be awarded the contract for the work required to complete the extension of Toyota Trail between Soper Creek Trail and the Bowmanville Cemetery. Staff Contact: David Ferguson, Purchasing Manager, 905-623-3379 Ext. 2209 or dferguson@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 — Bid Summary /_it1 t.7�'1iLaiii��: - •of i OFR i OTA-L'a1061i7•Tii1111171ATITIOUT Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Page 491 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-047-21 Attachment 1 — Bid Summary Municipality of Clarington Bid Summary CL2021-1 Toyota Trail Connection — Soper Creek Trail to Bowmanville Cemetery Page 5 BIDDER Total Bid (including HST) TOTAL BID (Net HST Rebate) CSL Group Ltd. $852,278.88 $767,503.53 Boyle Excavating Ltd. 880,192.17 792,640.31 M&S Architectural Concrete Ltd. 959,760.98 864,294.49 Royalcrest Paving & Contracting Ltd. 1,225,524.88 1,103,623.11 Blackstone Paving & Construction Ltd. 1,430,873.46 1,288,545.87 Page 492 Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Joint Committees Date of Meeting: October 25, 2021 Report Number: FSD-048-21 Submitted By: Trevor Pinn, Director of Financial Services/Treasurer Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: File Number: [If applicable, enter File Number] By-law Number: Report Subject: Appointment of Alternate to Audit and Accountability Committee Recommendations: 1. That Report FSD-048-21 and any related communication items, be received; 2. That, in accordance with the Appointment to Committee policy, Councillor be appointed to the Audit and Accountability Committee; 3. That the Terms of Reference of the Audit and Accountability Committee be amended to add an alternate member of Council; and 4. That all interested parties listed in Report FSD-048-21 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Page 493 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-048-21 Report Overview Page 2 The Audit and Accountability Committee consists of three appointed members. If a member is away, the alternate member would be able to attend the meeting in their place and continue the work of the Committee. 1. Background 1.1 The Audit and Accountability Committee consists of three Members of Council. If a committee member is away, the work of the Committee may continue as there is a quorum; however, if one of the two remaining individuals declares a conflict, the work of that Committee must wait for the next meeting. Delays resulting from rescheduled meetings could have consequences on time -sensitive matters, such as approval of financial statements, directions to the Internal Auditor or other issues. 1.2 At its meeting on August 4, 2021, the Audit and Accountability Committee passed a resolution asking Council to add an alternate member to the Committee to be available when a member of the Committee was unable to attend. Appointing an alternate member would ensure that the work of the Committee could continue, if one member was away and another member had a conflict on an item. 1.3 At the Council meeting of September 20, 2021, the minutes and recommendations of the Audit and Accountability Committee were approved by Council. As a result, an alternate member for the Audit and Accountability Committee should be chosen following the approved Appointment to Committee Policy. 2. Concurrence Not Applicable. 3. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that Committee appoint a member to act as an alternate on the Audit and Accountability Committee. Staff Contact: Trevor Pinn, Director of Financial Services/Treasurer, 905-623-3379 ext 2602, tpinn@clarington.net Attachments: Not Applicable Page 494 Municipality of Clarington Report FSD-048-21 Interested Parties: Page 3 There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. Page 495 Clarftwn MEMO If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. To: Mayor and Members of Council From: Andy Allison, CAO Date: October 20, 2021 Re: Executive Recruiting Services for Recruitment of a Chief Administrative Officer At its October 18, 2021 meeting, Council resolved as follows: That Report CAO-005-21 be received; That Staff be directed to negotiate and enter into a single source contract with Western Management Consultants, to provide services of a recruitment firm for the CAO's position, with an upset limit of $40,000; That a CAO Selection Committee be established to work with the recruitment firm to recommend to Council a short list of candidates to interview for the CAO's position; That the CAO Selection Committee consist of the Mayor, an executive with senior leadership experience in public sector organizations, and a Member of Council; and That Councillor Neal be appointed to the CAO Selection Committee. I am pleased to report that Western Management Consultants (David Howes) has been engaged at a cost of $30,000. In order to fulfil the direction of Council, a member of the public with senior leadership experience in public sector organizations needs to be appointed to the CAO Selection Committee. Page 1 1 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clap'nn torl An Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 1-800-563-1195 1 Local: 905-623-3379 1 in7o@clarington.net I www.clarington.net As this is a Committee appointment, the typical process would involve advertising, submission of applications; Report to Committee, voting on applicants and ratification by Council. However, since this is not strictly an Advisory Committee and since there is precedent for "appointment directly from the Committee floor", Committee could put forward a recommendation with a name for Council to ratify on November 1, 2021. The resolution could be worded as follows: be appointed to the CAO Selection Committee. Andy Allison CAO cc: Department Heads Page 12 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1C 3A6 1-800-563-1195 1 Local:905-623-3379 1 Pf dgington.net I www.clarington.net