Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-10-22 Electronic Council Communications Information Package Date:October 22, 2021 Time:12:00 PM Location:Council Members (in Chambers or MS Teams) | Members of the Public (MS Teams) Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Members of Council: In accordance with the Procedural By-law, please advise the Municipal Clerk at clerks@clarington.net, if you would like to include one of these items on the next regular agenda of the appropriate Standing Committee, along with the proposed resolution for disposition of the matter. Items will be added to the agenda if the Municipal Clerk is advised by Wednesday at noon the week prior to the appropriate meeting, otherwise the item will be included on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled meeting of the applicable Committee. Pages 1.Region of Durham Correspondence 1.1.Region of Durham Environmental Screening Report - DYEC Throughput Increase from 140,000 to 160,000 Tonnes Per Year 3 1.2.Update on Durham Region Waste Management Projects 571 2.Durham Municipalities Correspondence 3.Other Municipalities Correspondence 3.1.City of Vaughn Endorsing National Teen Driver Safety Week and Requesting the Ministry OF Transportation to Review Measures Impacting Newly Licensed Drivers 579 4.Provincial / Federal Government and their Agency Correspondence 4.1.Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Decision on the Proposed Land Use Compatibility Guideline 803 4.2.Office of MPP David Piccini Member of Provincial Parliament Northumberland-Peterborough South Office of MPP David Piccini Member of Provincial Parliament Northumberland-Peterborough South, Verify Ontario Tool Kit 804 4.3.Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Excess Soil Webinar Series, Outreach Updates and Regulation Implementation Reminder 806 5.Miscellaneous Correspondence 5.1.Call for Nominations for 2022-2023 Good Roads Board of Directors 809 5.2.EB-2021-0209 Enbridge Gas Inc. - 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing Program Application - OEB Notice of Application 813 October 22, 2021 Electronic Council Communications Information Package (ECCIP) Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Durham York Energy Centre Environmental Screening Report October 2021 Page 5 Page 2 of 138 Executive Summary The Durham York Energy Centre (DYEC) is located at 1835 Energy Drive in the Municipality of Clarington, Ontario, Canada and has been in commercial operation since 2016. Jointly owned by Durham Region and York Region (Regions), the DYEC is a waste management facility that produces energy from the combustion of residential garbage that remains after maximizing waste diversion programs. The DYEC generates enough electricity from the combustion of garbage to power approximately 10,000 homes a year. It also captures residual metals for recycling and reduces the volume of waste going to landfill by 90 per cent. The DYEC is currently permitted to process 140,000 tonnes of residential garbage (non- hazardous) per year that remains after all waste diversion efforts have been utilized (reducing, reusing, recycling and composting) in both Durham Region and York Region. Durham Region’s portion of DYEC annual processing capacity is 110,000 tonnes (approximately 80 per cent) and York Region’s is 30,000 tonnes (approximately 20 per cent). In 2018, the DYEC processed 140,000 tonnes of garbage, while recovering 3,848 tonnes of metal and generating approximately 85,412 MWh of electricity for sale to the provincial grid. By using state-of-the-art pollution control systems and proven, reliable energy from waste technology, the DYEC meets the most stringent environmental standards and reduces greenhouse gas emissions compared to the landfilling option. Since 2017, residents in the Region of Durham generated more than 110,000 tonnes of garbage for final disposal. The excess garbage is required to by-pass processing at the DYEC and must be sent directly to landfill for disposal. Since the Region of Durham has a growing population, it is expected that garbage generation will exceed 110,000 tonnes every year going forward, despite the diversion programs in place. The DYEC is capable of processing up to 160,000 tonnes of garbage annually without requiring any modifications or additions to the existing equipment or the building. Durham Region and York Region propose to utilize the additional waste processing Page 6 Page 3 of 138 capacity at the DYEC to make use of the existing equipment more efficiently while reducing the need to by-pass garbage directly to landfill disposal. Increasing the processing capacity of the DYEC to 160,000 tonnes per year requires an amendment to the facility Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA). The existing ECA permits processing a maximum of 140,000 tonnes per year. Regulations requires an Environmental Screening Process be undertaken for the project to evaluate the potential negative environmental effects of the proposed increase and to consult with the public. The Waste Management Projects Regulation (Ontario Regulation 101/07) outlines the regulatory requirements for Environmental Assessment (EA) for waste management projects. The requirements for completing an Environmental Screening Process are described in a detailed, step-by-step guide found in Part B of the MECP document: “Guide to Environmental Assessment Requirements for Waste Management Projects” (Guide). The Regions initiated an Environmental Screening Process in July 2019 with a Notice of Commencement announcing the proposal to increase the DYEC waste processing capacity. Key steps undertaken by the Regions include: Completion of the Environmental Screening Checklist found in Schedule 1 of the Guide Identification of potential negative environmental effects Completion of studies and assessment of potential negative environmental effects and impact mitigation measures Updated Emission Summary and Dispersion modeling Consultation with the public, agencies, indigenous communities and other interested parties Potential Effects As part of the review of potential negative environmental effects, the Environmental Assessment (EA) that was completed in 2009 prior to the initial construction of the DYEC, was reviewed. Since there is no new construction or equipment associated with Page 7 Page 4 of 138 the requested increase in processing capacity and the 2009 EA considered the effects of processing up to 400,000 tonnes of waste per year, many of the conclusions reached in the 2009 EA remain valid for a facility operating at a much lower capacity of 160,000 tonnes of waste per year. A discussion of the multiple technical studies completed for the 2009 EA is included in Section 4. Also, a Compliance Monitoring Program (CMP) was prepared and submitted to the MECP to satisfy Condition 4 of the Notice of Approval during the original EA process. The CMP outlines how the proponents will comply with conditions in the Notice of Approval and other commitments made in the EA Study Document. To ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and guidelines, data generated from the facility is monitored and reviewed on a continuous basis. A discussion on the CMP completed for the 2009 EA is included in Section 3.5 The Environmental Screening Process criteria outlined in the MECP Guide, was applied to the DYEC waste processing capacity increase from 140,000 to 160,000 tonnes per year. Potential negative environmental effects were identified in the screening checklist for: Air and noise Socio-Economic (proximity to aerodrome or airport) Air Emissions The local air quality in the vicinity of the DYEC is considered typical of urban areas in southern Ontario. Multiple industrial activities are conducted along the Highway 401 corridor in Clarington that contribute to the local air quality including odour and noise emissions. These include other waste management operations, traffic on Highway 401, construction of the 407 East extension, electricity production and resource industries. The increase in DYEC processing capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year will result in increased total air emissions from the facility. To determine the potential impact of the increased air emissions at the DYEC, an Air Quality Impact Assessment (AQIA) was completed assuming the worst-case operating and weather conditions. Golder Page 8 Page 5 of 138 Associates Limited simulated the potential change in local air quality using an MECP- approved (CALMET/CALPUFF) modelling methodology. This modelling methodology was used to ensure consistency with the previous air quality studies undertaken for DYEC in 2011. The dispersion model and version selected for use in the assessment is the U.S. RPA CALPUFF model version 7.2.1, level 150618, and CALMET model version 6.5.0, level 150223. The modelling concluded that the DYEC increase in capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year will comply with the MECP regulated air quality standards and will not have a significant negative effect on local ambient air quality. Testing scenarios are discussed in section 5. Total greenhouse gas emissions from the facility will also increase as the capacity is utilized to its full processing potential at the DYEC. However, it is important to note that despite facility emissions increasing, when reviewing the entire waste management greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) life cycle the net effect of GHGs is a decrease in emissions when compared to landfilling the same quantity of waste. The net emissions of GHGs from thermal treatment of waste compared to disposal at a landfill was assessed as part of the initial EA. This assessment indicated that the total GHG emissions from thermal treatment were less than those associated with transportation related emissions and landfill methane generation when waste is landfilled. GHG emissions from DYEC are reported as part of the federal Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program and are discussed in Section 3.8.6. Socio-Economic Socio-economic effects include community character, aesthetic impacts, effects on local businesses or public facilities, increased demands on community services, effects on the economic base of the community, traffic effects, interference with flight paths and public health and safety. All these areas were considered when completing the Environmental Screening Checklist. Since there is no construction or change to Page 9 Page 6 of 138 equipment associated with the capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year, the conclusions of the 2009 socio-economic studies remain valid. One potential effect as outlined in the screening criteria checklist was identified. The facility is within 8 kilometers of a helipad located at the Bowmanville Hospital. Although air ambulance service is currently suspended to the hospital, it is anticipated that a relocated helipad will be established in the future. Prior to construction, the DYEC received aeronautical clearance from Navigation Canada. Since there are no additional buildings or structures associated with the increase in capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year, the aeronautical clearance remains valid and there are no negative effects related to the proximity of the helipad. The Regions review has concluded there are no significant net environmental effects because of increasing capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year. Project Benefits Increasing the DYEC processing capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year will increase the efficiency of DYEC operations by allowing for full use of the existing equipment, maximizing the use of the investment without requiring any additional construction or building modifications. There is no capital cost associated with increasing the DYEC capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year. Rather, the Regions will realize financial savings from reducing by-pass waste, resulting in overall GHG emissions being reduced due to reduction in transportation and landfilling while also increasing revenue from additional power generation and materials recovery. The completion of this Environmental Screening Report (ESR) is anticipated by January 2022 (subject to change). The ESR is posted for a 60-day public review period and provided to the MECP for review. The final step in the Environmental Screening Process is posting a Statement of Completion. Page 10 Page 7 of 138 Glossary of Terms (Abbreviations) AAR – Acoustic Assessment Report APC – Air Pollution Control AQIA – Air Quality Impact Assessment CEBP – Clarington Energy Business Park – Located south of Highway 401 and north of the CN rail line, bordered by Courtice Road to the west and Crago Road to the east, in the Municipality of Clarington, Region of Durham. CEMS – Continuous Emissions Monitoring System CO2eq – Carbon Dioxide Equivalent CoPC – Chemicals of Potential Concern DYEC – Durham York Energy Centre EA – Environmental Assessment ECA – Environmental Compliance Approval ESDM – Emissions Summary and Dispersion Modelling ESR – Environmental Screening Report GHG – Greenhouse Gases Golder – Golder Associates Limited Guide – MECP Guide to Environmental Assessment Requirements for Waste Management Projects HHV – Higher Heating Value LCA – Lifecycle Assessment MECP – Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks MJ – Mega Joule Page 11 Page 8 of 138 MNRF – Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Mt - Megatonnes NOx – Nitrous Oxides, includes nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) OU – Odour Unit POI – Point of Impingement or Area of Highest Concentration Regions – Durham Region and York Region Screening – Environmental Screening Process Site – the Durham York Energy Centre structures and property SO2 – Sulphur Dioxide Page 12 Page 9 of 138 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 12 1.1 Identification of the Proponents ....................................................................... 12 1.2 Overview of the DYEC .................................................................................... 13 1.3 Study Area ...................................................................................................... 14 2. Environmental Screening Process ......................................................................... 17 2.1 Purpose of the Environmental Screening Report ............................................ 18 2.2 Study Timeframe ............................................................................................. 18 2.3 Report Organization ........................................................................................ 18 3. The Problem to be Addressed ............................................................................... 20 3.1 Problem Background ...................................................................................... 21 3.2 Current Waste Diversion Programs ................................................................ 21 3.2.1 Durham Region ........................................................................................ 21 3.2.2 York Region ............................................................................................. 23 3.3 Problem / Opportunity Statement .................................................................... 24 3.4 Long Term Waste Management Solutions ...................................................... 27 3.4.1 Durham Region ........................................................................................ 27 3.4.2 York Region ............................................................................................. 30 3.5 Screening Criteria and Potential Environmental Effects .................................. 33 3.6 Groundwater and Surface Water .................................................................... 35 3.6.1 Surface Water .......................................................................................... 35 3.6.2 Groundwater ............................................................................................ 38 3.7 Land ................................................................................................................ 41 Page 13 Page 10 of 138 3.8 Air and Noise .................................................................................................. 43 3.8.1 Odour ....................................................................................................... 45 3.8.2 Noise........................................................................................................ 48 3.8.3 Stack Emissions ...................................................................................... 53 3.8.4 Process Upset Conditions ........................................................................ 56 3.8.5 Existing Operations at Elevated Throughput ............................................ 57 3.8.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................................................... 58 3.9 Natural Environment ....................................................................................... 63 3.10 Resources ....................................................................................................... 67 3.11 Socio-Economic .............................................................................................. 68 3.11.1 Economic Assessment............................................................................. 69 3.11.2 Socio-Cultural Assessment ...................................................................... 72 3.11.3 Traffic Assessment .................................................................................. 75 3.11.4 Visual Assessment .................................................................................. 78 3.12 Heritage and Culture ....................................................................................... 80 3.13 Indigenous Communities ................................................................................ 81 3.14 Other ............................................................................................................... 83 4. Environmental Effects Assessment and Impact Management Plan ....................... 85 4.1 Environmental Effects Assessment ................................................................. 85 4.2 Impact Management and Monitoring ............................................................... 85 4.2.1 CEMS ...................................................................................................... 85 4.2.2 Air Pollution Control ................................................................................. 86 4.3 Air Emissions .................................................................................................. 87 4.3.1 Stack Emissions ..................................................................................... 88 Page 14 Page 11 of 138 4.3.2 Greenhouse Gas .................................................................................. 92 4.3.3 Noise........................................................................................................ 95 4.3.4 Proximity to Aerodome/Airport ................................................................. 97 4.3.5 Ambient Air .............................................................................................. 97 5. Significant Net Effects ......................................................................................... 123 6. Project Benefits .................................................................................................... 127 7. Next Steps ........................................................................................................... 130 7.1 Notice of Completion ..................................................................................... 130 7.2 60 Day Public Review Period ........................................................................ 130 7.3 Opportunity for Elevation Requests .............................................................. 130 7.4 Statement of Completion............................................................................... 131 8. References ........................................................................................................... 132 9. Appendices .......................................................................................................... 138 Page 15 Page 12 of 138 1. Introduction Durham Region and York Region (Regions) require additional waste disposal capacity for residual garbage generated by the residents of both regions. Co-owned by the Regions, the DYEC is a waste management facility that produces energy from the combustion of post-diversion residential garbage. Durham Region’s portion of DYEC processing capacity is 110,000 tonnes and represents the primary method of post- diversion waste disposal. York Region’s portion of processing capacity at the DYEC is 30,000 tonnes and represents one of multiple disposal facilities used by York Region. As constructed, the Durham York Energy Centre (DYEC) has the equipment and building capacity to process an additional 20,000 tonnes of waste annually (from 140,000 to 160,000 tonnes). The Regions have chosen to pursue an amendment to the existing Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) to allow the facility to receive and process an additional 20,000 tonnes of waste per year. After approval of the ECA amendment, the DYEC will be able to process 160,000 tonnes of waste per year. 1.1 Identification of the Proponents The Proponents for the Environmental Screening Report (ESR) are The Regional Municipality of Durham (Durham Region) and The Regional Municipality of York (York Region), collectively referred to as the Regions. Covanta Durham York Renewable Energy Limited Partnership, as the design-build-operate-maintain contractor for the DYEC, is also identified in the ECA as a partner. Both Regions have responsibility for the final disposal of residential waste generated within their respective regional borders. The Regions also maintain source separation programs for blue box materials, organic materials including leaf and yard waste, household hazardous wastes, batteries, electronics, tires and bulky items such as appliances and porcelain fixtures. Page 16 Page 13 of 138 1.2 Overview of the DYEC The DYEC provides a safe and environmentally sustainable method of waste disposal through thermal treatment and generates electrical power through a steam-turbine generator. The net electricity produced by the DYEC is sent to the local grid and distributed by Hydro One Inc. Additionally, the DYEC recovers ferrous and non-ferrous metals from the ash residue stream for recycling. The DYEC includes two mass-burn thermal treatment units, each with a nominal nameplate capacity of 218 tonnes per day (Maximum Continuous Rating (MCR)). The boilers are designed to process solid waste with a High Heat Value (HHV) of 11 MJ/kg to 15 MJ/kg. Therefore, the actual waste processing rates will vary based on the waste heating value that is determined by the composition of waste being processed. The two thermal treatment units includes a combustion grate, a boiler and an Air Pollution Control (APC) system. The two units can process waste independent from each other; either one or both can operate to process waste. After all diversion efforts have been employed, municipal solid waste (MSW) from residential sources is received, at the DYEC within an enclosed tipping building and discharged into the waste storage pit or the tipping floor for inspection. One truck per hour is discharged on the tipping floor for a manual visual inspection. Waste is mixed or “fluffed” by a grapple crane in the pit to achieve optimal combustion through consistent mix and moisture content of wastes prior to being placed in the feed chute hoppers. Once fed into the feed chute, the waste drops onto a feed table and is charged into the furnace by a hydraulic ram feeder that slides across the feed table. The waste then travels across a Martin reverse reciprocating stoker-grate where combustion occurs. The grate runs are independently and variably controlled to thoroughly mix and agitate the waste to promote complete combustion over a range of waste characteristics and moisture content. Natural gas is used as auxiliary fuel during start-up and shutdown and to ensure good combustion practices for meeting the DYEC ECA limits. Bottom ash is collected in Page 17 Page 14 of 138 hoppers and quenched in the ash discharger before being discharged onto a vibrating conveyor bound for the residue building where the bottom ash, ferrous and non-ferrous metals are separated (see Figure 2). 1.3 Study Area The DYEC is located in the Municipality of Clarington which was selected as the preferred site during the 2009 Environmental Assessment (EA) process. Identified as the Clarington 01 site in the 2009 EA, the DYEC property consists of approximately 12.1 hectares (ha) of land located in the Clarington Energy Business Park. The land is owned by Durham Region. Local Natural Environment The study area is bounded by the Northshore line of Lake Ontario to the south and Highway 401/418 exchange to the north. The Site is approximately 12.1 hectares in area and is located in the Clarington Energy Business Park. The closest natural area to the Site is the locally significant Tooley Creek Coastal Wetland, 0.87 km from the Site and 2.2 km from Darlington Provincial Park. The closest hazard land to the Site is at a distance of 100 m. The haul route for the Site is 0.9 km from the coastal wetland and 1.3 km from Darlington Provincial Park, with the majority of natural areas falling farther than 2 km from the haul route. The Site is composed of four fields with a central access road originating from Osborne Road. A total of 515 m of hedgerow is present along the boundaries of the Site and between the fields. These consist of a variety of common tree and shrub species representative of agricultural areas. The area surrounding the Site consisted of fallow and cultivated agricultural fields, which contained hedgerows with similar tree and shrub species. The Site contains no permanent watercourses and few documented species of conservation concern. Page 18 Page 15 of 138 The lands northeast and west of the Site are undeveloped and are currently used for agricultural purposes. However, the land located west of the facility has been designated as the future site for the Anerobic Digestion (AD)and Mixed Waste Pre-Sort (MWPS) Facility. The management of the natural environment features within Durham and York Regions are primarily under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Natural Resources and five conservation authorities – Central Lake Ontario, Toronto and Region, Ganaraska Region, Lake Simcoe Region and the Kawartha Region Conservation Authorities. Social/Land Use The Courtice Water Pollution Control Plant is located directly south, the East Penn Canada Battery Plant is located directly north, and Ontario Power Generation (OPG) is located directly east of the DYEC lands. Additionally, Copart Toronto is located 500 metres to the south and Darlington Nuclear Generating Station is located approximately 1.8 kilometres to the east. The nearest major intersection is Highway 401 and Courtice Road, which is approximately 1.7 kilometres from the DYEC. The construction of the Highway 407 East extension interchange with Highway 401 north of the site was completed in December 2019. The nearest residential area to the DYEC is designated as future urban residential and is located 3.2 kilometres from the DYEC. At the time of the 2009 EA there were two residences within one kilometre of the DYEC. In 2019, only one residence remains located east of the DYEC, east of the Copart auto auction site. Page 19 Page 16 of 138 Figure 1 DYEC and Surrounding Area Copart Courtice Water Pollution Control Plant Darlington Nuclear Generating Station 401 & Courtice Rd. 401/418 Interchange East Penn Proposed OPG Office OPG Office Page 20 Page 17 of 138 2. Environmental Screening Process The Environmental Screening Process (Screening) is a proponent driven, self- assessment process whereby proponents are responsible for determining if the process applies to the project. Part III of the Waste Management Projects Regulation (Ontario Regulation 101/07), enacted under the Environmental Assessment Act, identifies the waste management projects eligible to undertake a Screening. The requirements for completing a Screening are described in a detailed, step-by-step guide found in Part B of the MECP document: “Guide to Environmental Assessment Requirements for Waste Management Projects” (Guide). In accordance with the Guide, a screening criteria checklist was completed for the additional requested 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase for the DYEC. As part of the Screening every proponent must apply the screening criteria to a project to identify potential environmental effects. Proponents must consider potential environmental effects on groundwater and surface water, land, air and noise, natural environment and impact to resources as well as socio-economic, heritage and cultural effects and effects on Indigenous communities. The proponent must also conduct the Screening with sufficient consultation. The Guide provides a 14-step process for completing an environmental screening. A copy of the Guide is available from the MECP website: https://www.ontario.ca/page/guide- environmental-assessment-requirements-waste-management-projects#section-3. The prepared screening report will be reviewed by government agencies and interested persons, including Indigenous communities. The Environmental Screening Process is outlined below: 1. Publish a Notice of Commencement of a Screening Project 2. Identify the problem or opportunity and provide a project description 3. Apply the screening criteria checklist to identify potential environmental effects 4. Describe potential environmental effects and concerns/issues to be addressed Page 21 Page 18 of 138 5. Consult with interested persons to identify any issues or concerns 6. Conduct required studies and assessment of potential environmental effects 7. Develop impact management measures (including mitigation where required) 8. Consult with interested persons to identify any issues or concerns 9. Significant net effects and resolution of concerns 10. Conduct additional studies/assessment of effects and mitigation measures (where required) 11. Prepare an Environmental Screening Report 12. Publish a Notice of Completion of Environmental Screening Report 13. Elevation requests (if applicable) 14. Submission of Statement of Completion to the MECP 2.1 Purpose of the Environmental Screening Report The purpose of the Environmental Screening Report (ESR) is to document steps 1 to 11 as described above. The ESR incorporates all questions, comments and suggestions received during the Screening up to the issuance of Notice of Completion, step 12, which marks the commencement of the 60-day mandatory review period. 2.2 Study Timeframe Since the requested capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year does not require any construction or alterations to the building footprint, the ESR evaluates the potential environmental effects only during the operational phase of the DYEC. 2.3 Report Organization The ESR documents and summarizes the Screening process. The table below indicates where each step of the process is documented in the report. Page 22 Page 19 of 138 Table 1: Environmental Screening Process Index Environmental Screening Process Requirement Section of ESR where addressed Notice of Commencement (Step 1) Appendix G Problem and Opportunity Statement and Project Description (Step 2) Section 3 Environmental Screening Checklist (Step 3) Section 4, Appendix A Potential Environmental Effects (Step 4) Section 4 Consultation with interested agencies, stakeholders, Indigenous communities (Step 5) Appendix H Conduct studies and assessment of potential environmental effects (Step 6) Section 5 Develop impact management measures (Step 7) Section 5 Additional consultation with interested agencies, stakeholders, Indigenous communities (Step 8) Appendix H Significant net effects discussion (Step 9) Section 6 Additional studies and assessment of effects (Step 10) Section 3 (Air and Noise) Section 4 (Air and Noise) Section 5 (Air) Prepare Environmental Screening Report (Step 11) All sections and Appendices of this report Publish Notice of Completion of ESR, Elevation Request and Statement of Completion submission (Steps 12-14) Section 8 Page 23 Page 20 of 138 3. The Problem to be Addressed The Regional Municipality of Durham and the Regional Municipality of York the Regions are requesting to increase the permitted annual waste processing capacity of the DYEC by 20,000 tonnes per year, from 140,000 tonnes to 160,000 tonnes. This additional capacity is needed to accommodate population growth within the two Regions while continuing to maintain and increase diversion rates. In response to the ongoing COVID- 19 pandemic, the Regional Municipality of Durham and Regional Municipality of York received a temporary Emergency Amendment to the ECA at the DYEC to process an additional 20,000 tonnes of garbage, for an annual total of 160,000 tonnes of garbage until December 31, 2020. With a significant number of residents remaining at home, the Regions are continuing to see increases in the amount of garbage being placed at the curb. As more businesses re-evaluate their working from home models in a fundamental way, increased curbside waste is anticipated. The proposed capacity increase will also allow the DYEC to operate more efficiently and produce more energy with no modifications or additions to existing infrastructure. If approved, the additional capacity will further reduce the reliance on alternate waste disposal facilities outside the Regions’ borders. The DYEC is subject to regulatory approvals under the Environmental Assessment Act (the EA Notice of Approval) and the Environmental Protection Act (the Environmental Compliance Approval, or ECA). The EA Notice of Approval was issued in November 2010 followed by the ECA in June 2011. Facility construction commenced after the ECA was received and the facility achieved commercial operation in late January 2016. The DYEC is designed to accept materials with a HHV of 11.0 MJ/kg to 15.0 MJ/kg and produce a Gross Electrical Output between 712 and 1030 kWh/tonne. The DYEC is capable of processing 160,000 tonnes of waste per year with the existing equipment and is currently being underutilized despite demand for additional waste disposal capacity for residential waste within the Regions. Page 24 Page 21 of 138 3.1 Problem Background Nearly a decade ago, the EA and the ECA for the DYEC set the processing capacity to 140,000 tonnes per year. This capacity was divided between the Regions with Durham Region having 110,000 tonnes per year and York Region having 30,000 tonnes per year. Since then, population growth in Durham Region has led to garbage tonnages exceeding 110,000 tonnes per year, while York Region has relied more heavily on other energy from waste disposal facilities. As a result of increasing waste generation, some residential garbage is being by-passed to other disposal facilities including landfill. As an interim remedy to the shortage of processing capacity, an amendment to the current ECA for an additional 20,000 tonnes of processing capacity is being pursued by the Regions. As constructed, the DYEC can process up to 160,000 tonnes per year (nameplate capacity) without any modifications to infrastructure, processes or services. In 2018, 2019 and 2020 the Regions had to by-pass residential garbage to landfill and to other energy from waste facilities. By-passing otherwise processible residential garbage from the DYEC is not a sustainable or economical long-term solution with increasing cost risks associated with long-term landfill capacity, availability and price. As well, by-passed garbage to landfill results in overall greater greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions being produced and does not work towards the Regions climate mitigation targets. 3.2 Current Waste Diversion Programs 3.2.1 Durham Region Durham Region manages curbside collection of recyclables, organics, leaf and yard waste, residual and bulky garbage, metal goods, waste electrical and electronic equipment, battery and porcelain collection in six of eight area municipalities: Town of Ajax, Township of Brock, Municipality of Clarington, City of Pickering, Township of Scugog and Township of Uxbridge. The Region only collects blue box recycling in the Town of Whitby and City of Oshawa, but partners with both local municipalities to ensure uniform collection programs Region-wide. Almost 400 multi-residential buildings Page 25 Page 22 of 138 and townhouses are also serviced by Durham Region’s weekly waste collection programs. Onsite collection services offered in the buildings include recyclables, battery and e-waste collection. In addition to curbside collection services, the Region, in partnership with local municipalities, normally offers local waste reduction initiatives such as: S pring compost events; one in each local municipality S pecial Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment drop-off events and household hazardous waste drop-off events R euse drop-off events held from March to October, in partnership with local charities However, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, many events have been cancelled during 2020 and 2021 Following collection, the processing of recyclables, organics, yard waste and garbage is overseen by Durham Region. This is accomplished through a combination of blue box processing by a third party at the Durham Region’s Material Recovery Facility, external contracts for composting organics and yard waste at third party facilities and energy- from-waste recovery for residual waste. Durham Region provides a system of drop-off facilities for residential use. These facilities include various transfer stations equipped to receive, process and ship electronics, tires, household hazardous materials, metals and blue box recyclables. Wastes that cannot be diverted are disposed as residual garbage. The Region also owns and operate a designated household hazardous waste facility and leases another for public drop-off. Durham Region submits an annual datacall to the province through the Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority (RPRA) to receive funding from producers to assist with costs of operating the Blue Box Program. The datacall is the source of data used to confirm municipal diversion rates across the province. Page 26 Page 23 of 138 RPRA Annual Waste Diversion 2016 – 1st for Urban Regional Municipalities (55%) 2017 – 1st for Urban Regional Municipalities, 3rd Overall in the Province (65%*) 2018 – 1st for Urban Regional Municipalities, 3rd (tied) Overall in the Province (64%) 2019 – 1st for Urban Regional Municipalities, 3rd Overall in the Province (66%) 2020 – 63%** Pending Verification * RPRA modified the diversion calculation starting in 2017 to reflect energy recovery 3.2.2 York Region York Region provides waste management services to nine cities and towns: Towns of Aurora, East Gwillimbury, Georgina, Newmarket, Richmond Hill, Whitchurch-Stouffville, Township of King and Cities of Markham and Vaughan. As the upper-tier municipality, York Region provides waste processing and disposal while the lower-tier cities and towns provide waste collection services. The comprehensive waste reduction, reuse and recycling initiatives provided jointly by York Region and its cities and towns include curbside collection for residual waste, blue box recycling, source separated organics, leaf and yard waste, white goods and bulky items. York Region provides a network of drop-off facilities for residential use. These facilities include various Household Hazardous Waste and/or recycling depots and two Community Environmental Centres to provide convenient locations for residents and small businesses to drop off a variety of diversion materials. Accepted items vary by location and include bulky recyclables, construction and demolition materials, electronics, household hazardous materials, metals and blue box recyclables. Non- hazardous wastes that cannot be diverted are disposed as residual garbage. York Region uses three energy-from-waste disposal options for residual waste: Covanta Niagara in New York State, Emerald Energy in Brampton and the DYEC in the Municipality of Clarington. Page 27 Page 24 of 138 York Region also participates in the annual datacall administered by RPRA. York Region is larger than Durham Region and is classified as a Large Urban Municipality. RPRA Annual Waste Diversion 2016 – 1st Overall in Province (66%) 2017 – 1st for Large Urban Municipalities, 2nd Overall in Province (68%*) 2018 – 1st for Large Urban Municipalities (68*%) 2019 – 1st for Large Urban Municipalities, (66%*) 2020 – 66% Pending Verification * RPRA modified the diversion calculation staring in 2017 to reflect energy recovery 3.3 Problem / Opportunity Statement The ECA and EA Notice of Approval for the DYEC both limit the annual tonnes processed to 140,000 tonnes per year. As a result of these approval limits on DYEC processing capacity, the Regions are required to by-pass waste to other disposal facilities that could have otherwise been processed at the DYEC (Table 2). With growth continuing in Durham and York Regions, additional disposal capacity is needed to meet current system demands and to account for long term growth. The table below shows the DYEC by-pass tonnages from the previous three years and projections for 2026 and 2029. The tonnage projections were presented to Durham Regional Council on February 27, 2019. Table 2: Durham By-pass Waste Tonnes Year Tonnes By- passed to Other EFW Facilities Tonnes By- passed to Landfill Tonnes By-passed to Waste Composition Study Total Tonnes By-passed 2017 10,170 3,487 0 13,657 2018 370 6,280 3,657 10,307 2019 0 13,675 0 13,675 Page 28 Page 25 of 138 2020 0 15,409 0 15,409 2026 projected * * 0 33,850** 2029 projected * * 0 45,766** * Covanta contracts disposal of by-pass waste to landfill or other EFW facilities based on available capacity and cost for disposal **By-pass tonnage projections assume Durham’s planned Anaerobic Digestion and waste pre- sort is not operational; this project is discussed in Section 3.4. If the annual approval limit of 140,000 tonnes per year was increased, some of the additional demand for disposal capacity could be satisfied using the existing equipment at the DYEC. The maximum annual waste tonnage that an energy-from-waste facility can process when operating at full design load varies from year to year and is influenced by several factors. This maximum annual tonnage can be calculated using the following equation: =365 × × Where: Tmax = The maximum waste tonnage that can be processed in one year if the boilers operate at 100per cent design load whenever they are operating. Q = The design rate of fuel energy input. For the DYEC, this value is equal to 5,668,000 megajoules per day (MJ/d) with both boilers operating at full design load. HHV = The average Higher Heating Value of the fuel. This parameter measures the average energy content per unit of fuel mass and varies over time based on waste composition. The DYEC is designed to accept fuel with HHV ranging from 11 to 15 megajoules per kilogram (MJ/kg) which is equivalent to 11,000 to 15,000 megajoules per tonne (MJ/T). A = The number of hours that the boilers are available to process waste expressed as a percentage of total hours in a year, referred to “boiler availability” Page 29 Page 26 of 138 For example, in a year in which the DYEC achieves boiler availability of 94 per cent using fuel with an average HHV of 12,000 MJ/tonne, the maximum number of tonnes that could be processed with the boilers operating at full design load would be: (365 /)× (5,668,000 /)× 94%(12,000 /)=162,058 / However, if the HHV increases to 14,000 MJ/tonne while boiler availability is reduced to 90 per cent, the maximum number of tonnes that could be processed in one year would be: (365 /)× (5,668,000 /)× 90%(14,000 /)=132,996 / During the original Environmental Assessment, the DYEC’s nominal annual processing capacity was set at 140,000 tonnes per year based on expected normal HHV values and conservative boiler availability estimates to allow for planned and unplanned facility maintenance. However, as illustrated by the examples above, it is possible for the facility to process more than 140,000 tonnes per year in years of higher boiler availability or lower average HHV. The proposed amendment to the maximum annual processing limit would provide the Regions with the flexibility to use this additional processing capacity when available. This in turn would reduce the quantity of waste requiring alternate disposal at facilities outside the Regions’ borders. On April 22, 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the DYEC was issued an emergency approval for an ECA amendment, temporarily increasing the waste processing limit from 140,000 up to 160,000 tonnes per year to accommodate the additional curbside waste generated by residents working from home. The total amount of waste attributed to the DYEC including by-pass waste for 2020 was 160,750 tonnes. This includes 145,343 tonnes shipped to and processed at the DYEC and 15,409 by-passed to landfills. The requested processing limit amendment provides an opportunity to achieve significant environmental and social benefits using existing infrastructure, such as: Page 30 Page 27 of 138 Reduced reliance on disposal capacity outside the Regions’ borders and subject to market fluctuations for price Reduced highway traffic and GHG emissions associated with long-haul transportation to remote disposal sites Reduced methane emissions from landfill disposal Increased energy recovery and displacement of fossil fuel electricity generation Reduced cost to Regional taxpayers Through the Screening process, the Regions will review studies and where necessary, update modelling completed during the original EA or prepare new models where required to demonstrate that these benefits can be realized with no unacceptable environmental impacts. Several of the studies undertaken during the original process included consideration of impacts of a larger facility, with a processing capacity of up to 400,000 tonnes per year which remains a conservative estimate for the facility operating under the requested capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year. The Regions have completed a comprehensive review of all the original technical studies in 2019. The reviews confirmed the original calculations and conclusions are still valid and, in some cases, the current operation is more efficient than what was initially projected in 2009. Additionally, it was determined that the Region undertake updating the studies and modeling for noise and air emissions. Results from the updated modelling are discussed in sections below. 3.4 Long Term Waste Management Solutions 3.4.1 Durham Region Durham Region (Region) developed an initial Long-Term Waste Management Strategy Plan (LTWMSP) in 1999 to cover the twenty years to 2020. Durham Region is one of the fastest growing regions in Canada. By 2041, Durham Region’s population is expected to almost double, increasing to 1.2 million people. The Region is now undertaking the development of the next Long-Term Waste Management Plan (Waste Plan) for the next twenty years (2021 to 2040). As part of the phase one development Page 31 Page 28 of 138 during 2020 for the Waste Plan, the Region undertook consultation with stakeholders to get input on the guiding principles, vision and objectives that will guide the Region’s waste management programs and services over the planning period. Durham Region Council approved the guiding principles, vision and objectives at the January 27, 2021 meeting. A copy of the Waste Plan can be viewed: here The guiding principles are as follows: 1. Emphasize rethink, reduce and reuse principles as the first steps in reducing waste generation. 2. Deliver cost effective waste management services to a rapidly growing and diverse population. 3. Work with producers and importers of designated products and packaging to implement “Extended Producer Responsibility” and adjust Region waste programs as required. 4. Apply innovative approaches to Region waste streams to manage them as resources in a circular economy. 5. Demonstrate leadership in sustainability to address the climate crisis by reducing greenhouse gas emissions from waste management activities. The Region’s vision is, together, with our residents, we will reduce the amount of waste we create and manage the generated waste as a resource. We will build an innovative system, balancing financial needs and environmental sustainability. To execute the vision, the following objectives were established: 1. Engage with residents to build an understanding and awareness of the 5Rs (Rethink, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Recover) and the Region's waste management programs and services. 2. Reduce the quantity of waste we create. 3. Increase diversion of waste from disposal and support the Circular Economy. Page 32 Page 29 of 138 4. Support the Region’s greenhouse gas reduction and climate change mitigation efforts. 5. Protect or improve water, land, and air quality in Durham Region. Phase two of development, occurring during 2021, is consulting on the draft targets and actions to achieve the objectives. Delivery of a draft Waste Plan as well as the 1st five- year action plan is anticipated for Council approval in early 2022. As part of developing the next Waste Plan, the Region is focusing on maximizing the diversion of materials from waste and recovering waste as resources to optimize its existing and planned disposal and processing infrastructure. This includes long-term efforts to manage waste within our municipal borders. To achieve this Durham Region is pursuing the construction of a Mixed Waste Pre-sort and Anaerobic Digestion (AD) facility. In June 2018, Council (Report # 2018-COW-146) approved a Mixed Waste Pre- sort and AD facility as the preferred technologies for the Region’s long-term organics management strategy. In June 2019, Council approved report 2019-COW-17 that directed the Region to proceed with the Mixed Waste Pre-sort facility and AD facility utilizing wet anaerobic digestion under a design, build, operate and maintain (DBOM) service delivery approach. On May 27, 2020, Council (Report # 2020-WR-1) received for information an update on the evaluation of siting for the project. Council was advised that the Mixed Waste Pre- sort and Anaerobic Digestion Facility Siting Report was published and that a Public Information Centre was held on February 27, 2020. As a result of the analysis of the siting options and public consultation, the South Clarington Location at 383 Courtice Road was identified as the preferred location for the AD facility. On August 20, 2020, the Region issued RFPQ-1062-2020 for Mixed Waste Pre-sort and Wet Anaerobic Digestion Processing Facility that closed on December 1, 2020. The proposed AD facility operations will remove the organic fraction of waste that was incorrectly sorted and from multi-residential buildings which are not currently being captured by the Durham Region Green Bin program for processing in an anaerobic Page 33 Page 30 of 138 digestor. The AD facility will not replace the current Green Bin program. Additionally, Durham Region intends to recover recyclables such as metals, and remove non- combustible materials from the waste. This further separation will reduce the amount of waste that will be sent for disposal at the DYEC from Durham Region. However, the requested processing capacity is still needed to accommodate the projected population growth in the Region. The procurement process continues to be ongoing, with staff returning to Council for approval at critical milestones within the process. It is anticipated that the AD facility will be operational in 2024. Once the AD facility is operational, staff will need to determine the full impact that separation of additional organics, metals and non-combustibles will have on DYEC processing capacity. It is anticipated that removing additional materials from the waste upstream of the DYEC, will delay the need for further DYEC expansion. 3.4.2 York Region York Region’s long-term waste management master plan (SM4RT Living Plan) approved in September 2013, was originally developed with a 25 to 40 year time horizon to extend from 2039 to 2054. This plan established the business case for expanding the focus of policy and programming, from beyond diversion to waste prevention. York Region was the first Ontario municipality to move in this direction; in the last five years, the province has also made this shift, along with other communities. As part of regular update cycles, York completed an update to its waste management master plan in 2020 (SM4RT Living Plan 2020 Update) setting the stage for waste management as far out as 2059 timeframe while outlining actions for the next five years aspiring to ensure nothing goes to waste. The updated plan continues to focus efforts on waste prevention and reuse – expanding and refining successful community programs such as curbside giveaway days, textile recycling, repair cafes, lending libraries and food waste reduction and initiating programs to address single use items and support community groups in developing new circular economy programming. These efforts are aimed at reaching the Region’s waste reduction targets by moving the Region towards a circular economy. York’s 2031 aspirational targets aim to reduce the Page 34 Page 31 of 138 curbside residual waste generation rate by 20 per cent and the curbside organics generation rate by 15 per cent below the 2014 baseline, focusing on the two largest curbside streams, recognizing that the Blue Box program will transition in the next five years. The Region continues to be committed to maximizing diversion through continuous improvement of the performance of curbside programs such as green bin, yard waste and blue box and community depot services. Improving diversion in multi-residential properties is a priority over the next five years. Tracking and reporting on waste generation rates and diversion rate helps understand long term waste trends and progress towards circularity. An annual report is submitted to the MECP each year to satisfy the DYEC EA condition for diversion reporting. The latest report can be found here. Long term organics and residual waste processing capacity will be secured through new contracts to be tendered in 2021/2022 The SM4RT Living Plan 2020 Update by York examined long term capacity needs for organics processing and residual waste disposal to service the Region’s growing population. Earlier work identified anaerobic digestion as a preferred technology over aerobic composting for source separated organic waste (SSO) from the Region’s green bin program. The Long Term SSO Processing Plan, included in the master plan, looked at the cost/benefit analysis of a range of location and ownership options for anaerobic digestion facilities supporting York’s case to issue an RFP in 2021 to provide anaerobic digestion capacity for processing the Region’s SSO at privately owned facilities in a cost effective and environmentally sustainable manner for the next 25 years while accounting for greenhouse gas emissions from all phases of service delivery. The RFP was issued on June 7, 2021 and will close October 29, 2021. Transition to anaerobic digestion technology is expected to reduce the Region’s greenhouse gas emissions by up to 15,000 tonnes per year relative to existing contracts. Page 35 Page 32 of 138 The Residual Waste Processing Plan, also part of the master plan, included an analysis of the projected tonnage of residual waste out to 2050 and identified a strategy for ensuring sufficient capacity to meet anticipated need given a number of York Region’s current residual waste contracts expire between 2020-2028. The plan recommendation endorsed by York Regional Council in 2020, to secure up to 120,000 tonnes of annual EFW processing capacity from one or more privately owned facilities from September 2023 through January 2046, will serve as an interim bridge until such time as the Region has enough tonnage along with Durham, to undertake expansion of the DYEC. Several factors led to this decision, including expected reduction in residual tonnage due to the transition of the blue box program to extended producer responsibility; the need to maintain sufficient landfill capacity as a contingency and to manage non- recyclable material not suited for EFW; and plans by Durham Region for a pre-sort facility that are expected to further increase diversion from the DYEC. York staff are working on an RFP for securing the EFW capacity, to be released ahead of existing EFW contract expiry of September 2023, making use of the fourth “R” (recovery) as it relates to energy recovery, for those materials that cannot be managed by other means, only after placing highest priority on the first three “Rs” (reduction, reuse and recycling) in accordance with the Region’s “4 Rs” waste management hierarchy. SM4RT Living Plan recognizes and supports partnerships as key elements of transition to circular economy The Plan recognizes that successful social and environmental change requires support from many players and outlines some of the many success stories of community champions who are leading the way in transforming their services to adopt waste prevention principles. Action areas under the plan’s objectives spark change across the Region through leadership, support for community-led action and advocacy to other levels of government. An example of one action area includes establishing a program that will provide funding to support programs within York Region that align with SM4RT Living. This $100,000 Circular Economy Initiatives Fund was launched in February 2021, with the first round of projects slated to begin in August 2021. Successful Page 36 Page 33 of 138 projects are chosen from the pool of applicants based on established criteria to support areas of waste prevention, reduction, reuse, repair and recycling. With the anticipated 160,000 tonnes per year processing capacity increase at the DYEC, the Anaerobic Digestion and Mixed Waste Pre-sort facility and the successful and effective implementation of further diversion efforts by both Durham Region and York Region, the DYEC is not expected to require additional disposal capacity beyond 160,000 tonnes per year until after 2035. Note: should any of the current factors being considered change- the Regions projected long term waste processing capacity needs will change accordingly. 3.5 Screening Criteria and Potential Environmental Effects As part of the Screening, the MECP requires the completion of an Environmental Screening Checklist. The checklist is an evaluation of potential environmental effects that could result from the project. The checklist was completed to evaluate the potential effects from increasing the annual capacity of the DYEC by 20,000 tonnes to a maximum of 160,000 tonnes per year. The draft checklist was presented at the first Public Information Centre for the project and the completed checklist is attached as Appendix A. The checklist identified two areas where negative potential effects could exist as a result of the change in the facility. Air and Noise Socio Economic (proximity to airport or heliport) Prior to the construction of the DYEC, an individual EA was completed to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the facility and determine mitigating actions for those effects. The 2009 EA report and associated technical studies can be viewed on the DYEC website under the Facility Development Document section: Here Numerous Technical Study Reports, referenced in later sections of this report, were completed to evaluate potential effects on the natural environment, socio-cultural conditions of the community and air, water, noise or vibration impacts. The 2009 EA Page 37 Page 34 of 138 was completed for two tonnage scenarios, the approved 140,000 tonnes per year and a proposed future expansion to 400,000 tonnes per year. As part of the EA and ECA approval process a Compliance Monitoring Program was also established by the Regions in 2011 and approved by the MECP. The program outlines how the Regions comply with the EA Notice of Approval conditions and other commitments made in the EA study document. Annual compliance monitoring reports are submitted to the Director of the MECP Environmental Approvals Branch to satisfy condition 4 of the EA. There are several monitoring plans currently being adhered to at the DYEC. These plans include the groundwater surface water monitoring plan, soil monitoring plan, ambient air monitoring plan, emissions monitoring plan, noise monitoring plan, odour management and mitigation plan, community communications plan, waste diversion program monitoring plan, third party audit plan and spill contingency and emergency response plan. The monitoring plans can be viewed under the Environmental Monitoring section of the DYEC website. As part of this Screening, the 2009 Technical Study Reports were reviewed to determine if the initial studies can be applied to the 160,000 tonnes per year scenario to identify potential concerns and determine if the monitoring and mitigation measures already in place at the DYEC facility are sufficient to mitigate any additional impacts from the 20,000 tonnes per year waste processing capacity increase. The report review included a summary of the initial findings, any mitigating efforts included as part of the initial design and construction of the facility and an evaluation of anticipated changes due to the additional 20,000 tonne per year capacity. As well, the DYEC has a robust Compliance Monitoring Program prepared and submitted to the MECP to satisfy Condition 4 of the Notice of Approval during the original EA process. Results of the monitoring program are consistent with findings of the 2009 Technical Study Reports. Reports detailing the Facility’s performance as it pertains to compliance with MECP standards have been submitted to the MECP on an annual basis since operation commenced. Annual reports including 2020 can be viewed at: Annual Reports Page 38 Page 35 of 138 The rationale for the checklist results is presented below. 3.6 Groundwater and Surface Water Review of the following 2009 studies and reports that were undertaken during the initial Environmental Assessment continue to demonstrate, through the established monitoring program, that there are no anticipated adverse effects or additional impacts to groundwater or surface water that will result from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase as outlined in the screening criteria checklist: Surface Water and Groundwater Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-2) Natural Environment Assessment (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-7) Geotechnical Investigation Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-4) Environmental Compliance Approval Application Submission Stormwater (Golder Associates, 2011) The following legislation, as amended, was reviewed, and it was determined that the DYEC continues to be compliant as there have been no legislative changes which would impact the groundwater and surface water monitoring program. Ontario Drinking Water Standards (ODWS) (2006) Provincial Water Quality Objectives (PWQO) (1994) Canadian Water Quality Guidelines (CWQG) (2011) Environmental Compliance Approval Application for Stormwater (Golder Associates, 2011) 3.6.1 Surface Water The Surface Water monitoring program was developed mainly to monitor impacts from the construction phase of the DYEC to the nearby Tooley Creek, to which the surface water is ultimately conveyed. Page 39 Page 36 of 138 The general slope of the site is from northeast to southwest. The grading of the Site directs runoff towards two Stormwater Management Ponds (SWM) east and west, located at the southeastern and southwestern quadrants of the Site. The Site runoff is conveyed from northeast to southwest via overland flow or through two constructed swales that direct runoff towards the two SWM ponds along the southern perimeter. Stormwater discharges from these SWM ponds and are controlled by float-pumps in the aft bay of both ponds, to keep water levels at approximately 1 meter below the invert of the pipe outlets. Discharge from the pond is controlled by the size of the outlet pipes. Both ponds discharge from an inverted (reverse slope) pipe into an outlet structure. In the outlet structure the water flows through a perforated riser pipe into an outlet pipe before discharging to the drainage swale. The ponds discharge during a precipitation event that causes the water levels in the ponds to rise above the top elevation of the inverted discharge pipes. To date there have been no major storm events that have resulted in uncontrolled discharge. The Site outfall disperses flow through a grassy, overland flow route leading to the receiving swale south of the Site, and immediately north of the CN Rail ditch. This common receiving swale also conveys surface water from properties located immediately east of the DYEC located on the east side of Osborne Road. Surface water flow from this swale is conveyed under Courtice Road via corrugated steel pipe and discharges into Tooley Creek approximately 400 metre downstream and west of the Courtice Road crossing. (Golder Associates., 2013) The Site is located within the Tooley Creek watershed which in its lower reaches supports cold water fisheries. Tooley Creek is a small meandering watercourse receiving most of its flow from agricultural and rural runoff and groundwater inputs in its northern reaches. (Jacques Whitford Ltd., 2009). The Tooley Creek Watershed is fully contained within the Municipality of Clarington and has an area of 1040 ha. The headwaters originate in the Maple Grove Wetland Page 40 Page 37 of 138 Complex north of Highway 2. The definable stream length of the creek is 26 km (AECOM Canada Ltd., 2009). The increase in capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year will not direct additional surface water into the stormwater management ponds that currently exist onsite. To process the additional 20,000 tonnes per year of waste, no additional construction is required to the facility. Also, there will be no changes to the drainage area or construction to add additional impervious surfaces. Therefore, there are no concerns with additional on-site surface water run-off into the existing stormwater ponds which discharge into the Tooley Creek wetland. In 2011, Sigma Engineering analyzed the site design for the stormwater based on the 2009 Surface Water and Groundwater Assessment Technical Study Report, and stated the original design included a conservative assumption that the 100-year storm is contained in the stormwater pond design and that the ponds are sized to meet governing erosion and sediment control requirements. The stormwater management design is currently oversized, as it was designed to accommodate the additional runoff associated with infrastructure to process 400,000 tonnes per year. Sigma Engineering reviewed and revised the original analysis completed for the Surface Water and Groundwater Assessment Technical Study Report, to address design changes that occurred after the initial Environmental Assessment was completed in 2009. The revised report was submitted to the MECP as part of the ECA application and maintains the 100-year stormwater capacity along with erosion and sediment control requirements. The initial EA proposed one on-site stormwater management pond, however, with the development of the Clarington Energy Business Park, stormwater plan modifications were made to the site stormwater design and a second stormwater management pond was constructed. The drainage area contributing to the stormwater ponds was reduced from 12.4 hectares to 10.1 hectares due to the construction of a new right-of-way along Energy Drive which has its own drainage system including a wider swale, providing Page 41 Page 38 of 138 more capacity to the onsite storage ponds. As a result of these off-site changes, the design provides a better level of stormwater management than what was proposed in the initial EA documents. Additionally, to ensure the SWM system including the ponds continue to function as designed, inspections are conducted annually along with annual spill training and weekly inspections. The most recent annual inspection, completed on November 20, 2020, encompasses visual inspection of the pond outlet structure overflow, pond inlet headwall, discharge points, collection system and general surrounding vegetation, seeps and leaks and visible pollution. There have been no complaints or reportable spills regarding the SWM system. No major issues were identified during the annual sewage inspection report, included in Appendix B Based on the review of the initial EA, final design of the SWM and results on ongoing annual inspections, there will not be any significant negative effects to stormwater as a result of the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. 3.6.2 Groundwater Prior to the start of construction of the DYEC, the Regions in consultation with the MECP prepared and implemented a groundwater and surface water monitoring plan in accordance with EA Condition 20. The plan is designed to provide an understanding of both groundwater and surface water quality during the construction and operation phases of the DYEC and to ensure ongoing environmental management of the site. Groundwater monitoring wells were established prior to facility operation at five locations on the DYEC property to evaluate water quality conditions. Monitoring wells are placed at each of the four corners of the site, as well as central to the site and represent water quality conditions of upgradient and downgradient water quality and for potential compromise of the waste storage pit. Groundwater monitoring results to date have continued to confirm the absence of any impacts to groundwater resulting from waste processing operations at the DYEC. In 2020, the groundwater analytical results for the required parameters of analysis continue to satisfy their respective ODWS, with the exception of select salt-related Page 42 Page 39 of 138 parameters within one of the monitoring locations. As reported in the 2020 Annual Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Report, there is no indication that the elevated concentrations of chloride and sodium within the groundwater occur as a result of DYEC waste treatment operations. The elevated concentrations of chloride and sodium are interpreted to be attributed to the seasonal exfiltration of salt-impacted surface water from the East Stormwater Management Pond that is interpreted to migrate easier through the more permeable sandy silt. As the facility does not store or utilize large quantities of sodium or chloride in the waste processing, an evaluation of potential road salt application impacts within the groundwater was completed using the method proposed by Panno et al. (2005, 2006) to aid in determining the source. Based on the November 2020 groundwater quality results, the chloride/bromide (Cl/Br) ratios within the groundwater at several monitoring wells indicates that groundwater quality is alluding towards impacts from surface salt application on Energy Drive, Osbourne Road, and/or the on-site roadways/parking lots applied throughout the winter season. Concentrations of chloride and sodium within the groundwater at some of the monitoring locations have been increasing since 2014, which coincides with the construction of Energy Drive north and west of the Site, as well as on-Site roadways and parking lots. The monitoring and mitigation plan currently in place are adequate to protect groundwater at a waste processing capacity of 160,000 tonnes per year. Groundwater monitoring results will not vary significantly as a result of the additional waste processing capacity of 160,000 tonnes per year. In addition, there will be no changes to the waste storage pit to accommodate the proposed increase, as the waste storage pit was sized to support the operations up to 250,000 tonnes per year. With no modification or construction planned for the waste storage pit, there will be no concerns with altering the integrity of the pit walls. The storage pit is a sealed concrete pit set 5.5 metres below grade which does not allow leachate from waste to come into contact with groundwater. Several design features were incorporated into the DYEC to protect groundwater including: Page 43 Page 40 of 138 A zero-process water discharge facility. o Process wastewater equipment drains, sinks, and washdown is collected in various drains, sumps and trenches and is sent to the settling basin. This water cannot be discharged to the sanitary sewer and is used for internal processes. Pumped wastewater from this system is used as primary ash discharger makeup and refuse pit dust control. Intermittent and continuous blow down water, non-recoverable samples from the steam sample panel and reject water from the reverse osmosis system are also collected in the wastewater holding tank. From this tank the wastewater is pumped to the fly ash conditioning system and to the APC evaporative cooler. The waste storage pit is constructed using one-metre-thick concrete conforming to Canadian Standards Association A23.1 Class C-1 performance standards which applies to structurally reinforced concrete that is exposed to chlorides at a wide range of temperature conditions. The waste storage pit is lined on the exterior with a sodium bentonite waterproofing membrane to prevent leakage of water into or out of the pit. The waste storage pit was oversized during the original construction and has the capacity to store waste for up to four days when operating at a 250,000 tonnes per year waste processing rate. The waste storage pit construction includes PVC plastic water stops in the construction joints which form a continuous, watertight barrier that prevents the passage of fluid. Diesel tanks are of double-walled construction with a leak detection system and are checked daily per the DYEC Containment Protocol. A containment dyke surrounds the ammonia tank. Daily general inspection of the ammonia tank for leaks and annual calibrations of the ammonia alarm are safeguards that are included in the DYEC Containment Protocol. Page 44 Page 41 of 138 In the unlikely event that a groundwater contamination issue was to develop at the site, the low rate of groundwater flow would limit the rate of contaminant dispersion and provide the Regions with sufficient time to undertake remediation. Borehole logs for the monitoring wells confirm that the facility is constructed on silty glacial till soils. Based on the hydraulic conductivities and the horizontal hydraulic gradients observed on the site, it is anticipated that surface water will infiltrate into the ground and travel at a low rate of approximately one metre per year or less. Based on the review of the initial EA, groundwater impact mitigation design features of the DYEC and current groundwater monitoring results, no significant negative effects to groundwater will result from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. 3.7 Land A review was completed of the following 2009 study that was undertaken during the initial Environmental Assessment, that shows there are no anticipated potential effects to land as outlined in the screening criteria checklist. The Social/Culture Assessment - Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-8) The following social/cultural indicators were considered in the Technical Study to determine the site’s compatibility with existing and proposed land uses: Potential for disruption to use and enjoyment of residential properties Potential for changes in community character Potential for disruption to use and enjoyment of public facilities and institutions Potential for disruption to use and enjoyment of cultural and recreational resources Compatibility with existing land use designations and proposed land use designations Page 45 Page 42 of 138 At the time of the 2009 EA, the area surrounding the proposed location for the DYEC included the Courtice Water Pollution Control Plant immediately south of the site, auto auction sites immediately east and north of the site and agricultural lands west and further east of the site; on-farm residences were identified with the agricultural property use on the east and west sides of the site. An uninhabitable residence was also located northwest of the site. Further north of the site, north of Highway 401 are light industrial businesses and a few residences. The waterfront trail runs south and east of the site. The DYEC is located on employment lands/business park as designated in both the Regional and Clarington Official Plans. The DYEC is located on a portion of land that has been designated the Clarington Energy Business Park (CEBP). The lands are zoned employment/light industrial areas which is compatible with the DYEC activity: Zoned: Business Park Map A2 Land Use Courtice Urban Area (June 2018) C larington Zoning By-law 84-63 Sections 23C – Energy Park Light Industrial and 23D Energy Park General Industrial (2015) The DYEC continues to be located in a designated employment/ light industrial area and the land use is consistent with the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement Part V Section (1). As no construction or alterations to the site are required for the increase in capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year, there will be no additional impacts to nearby properties. The Technical Study concluded that the DYEC would have minimal overall net effects on residential properties, public facilities or institutions and is compatible with the development of the future Clarington Energy Business Park. Since the 2009 Environmental Assessment Technical Studies were completed, the following changes occurred to the DYEC surrounding land use. The Ontario Power Generation completed construction of a training centre, the Darlington Energy Complex, located at the southeast corner of Energy Drive and Osbourne Road, directly east of the DYEC Manheim Oshawa Auctions is no longer located north of the DYEC Page 46 Page 43 of 138 The uninhabitable residence and the residence located west of the DYEC have been demolished W ork has been completed on the new 418 interchange and connector highway between the 401 and 407 East extension East Penn Canada Battery Distribution Centre, located north of the DYEC at 1840, Energy Drive, Courtice, ON, is expected to complete construction and begin operation September 2021 Based on the review of the initial EA and current municipal zoning for the DYEC and surrounding property, no significant negative effects to land use will result from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. 3.8 Air and Noise Review of the 2009 studies that were undertaken during the initial Environmental Assessment identified potential changes to air emissions and are outlined in the screening criteria checklist including: Air Quality Assessment - Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-1) Acoustic Assessment - Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-5) Potential changes attributed to the larger quantities of air and combustion gases being released through the stack as the result of processing an additional 20,000 tonnes per year are possible. The following legislation, standards, and guidelines have been reviewed to determine the implications to the DYEC capacity increase, including: Guideline A-7: Air Pollution Control, Design and Operations Guidelines for Municipal Waste Thermal Treatment Facilities (2010) Ontario Regulation 419/05: Air Pollution - Local Air Quality (as amended) Page 47 Page 44 of 138 Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) (2013) Ontario’s Ambient Air Quality Criteria (AAQC) (2012 as amended) Ontario Air Standards for Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) (2018) MECP Publication NPC-300 Environmental Noise Guideline – Stationary and Transportation Sources (2013) Publication NPC-233 Information to be submitted for approval of stationary sources of sound (1995) Environmental Compliance Approval Application for Air and Noise (2011) To assess the impacts of the change in emissions from the proposed capacity increase, an air quality dispersion modelling preliminary assessment for a 160,000 tonnes per year scenario was prepared by Golder Associates Limited (2019) and compared to the 140,000 tonnes per year scenario as found in Attachment 3 of the 2011 Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report dated March 2011. Technical Memorandum - Air Quality Impact of 160,000 tonnes of waste per year at Durham York Energy Centre (Golder Associates Limited, 2019) Appendix C As a result of consultation with the MECP on the screening checklist and the above noted technical memorandum, the MECP requested that an Air Quality Impact Assessment (AQIA) and an updated stand-alone Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) be prepared as part of the Screening Process and ECA Application. In a memo received by the Region dated October 22, 2019 from the MECP, the Regions were directed to address specific comments to provide clarity to the initial preliminary assessment through the preparation of a refined Air Quality Impact Assessment. In consultation with their modelling branch, the MECP requested that the model version and accompanying data being used should be updated to more recent versions, and that an ESDM report be prepared. An Air Quality Impact Assessment (AQIA) for DYEC was undertaken by Golder in 2021 in support of the Environmental Screening Report. This assessment focused on predicting changes in the airborne concentrations of Indicator Compounds which Page 48 Page 45 of 138 include all contaminants identified in previous air quality reports (ie. the Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) Report)(Golder, 2011), plus additional compounds for which source testing data is routinely completed (Ortech, 2021). The AQIA is discussed in Sections 4 and 5. A stand-alone ESDM has been prepared by Golder Associates using an approved updated version of the modelling software as recommended by the MECP in support of the ECA Application. An ECA amendment application, including updated ESDM report, will be prepared following the completion and submission of the ESR to the MECP 3.8.1 Odour The waste processed at the DYEC is a heterogeneous mixture of residential waste materials and may include odorous substances. Potential odour emission sources associated with the processing of the waste include: Truck transportation of waste onto the site Waste handling and storage onsite Thermal treatment of waste onsite Page 49 Page 46 of 138 Figure 2 DYEC Process The waste delivery trucks are fully enclosed to reduce the potential for odour emissions while transporting waste. Trucks entering the facility are monitored by the scalehouse to ensure the contents are sealed and secure, wheels are cleaned, and no signs of leakage are visible. If found to be unacceptable, the scalehouse operator will notify the client. If the truck passes inspection it is permitted to proceed to the tipping building. The tipping building is located on the northside of the facility and is equipped with multiple bays to minimize waste truck line-ups outside the tipping building during peak truck arrival periods. The tipping building is equipped with motor operated high speed entrance bay door facing east towards the DYEC Visitors Centre parking lot and an exit door facing west towards Region owned land. The doors remain closed except when vehicles are entering or exiting the tipping building. In addition, the louvers on the north outside wall Page 50 Page 47 of 138 of the tipping building are closed during truck deliveries. As shown in Figure 2, unloading of waste from the trucks occurs within the enclosed tipping building to prevent potential odours from escaping to the external environment The air from the tipping building is drawn in through inlet ducts above the waste storage pit for use as combustion air and maintains negative pressure in the tipping building which prevents the escape of dust and odour. Drawing air from the waste storage pit eliminates ambient odour problems as the temperature in the combustion chamber ranges from 1000 to 1400ºC, which is sufficient to complete the combustion of all organic vapours. Potential odour emissions for 140,000 tonnes per year were assessed as part of the initial ECA application for Air and Noise, following the MECP Technical Bulletin Methodology for Modelling Assessments of Contaminants with 10-minute Average Standards and Guidelines under Ontario Regulation 419/05 (2008). The odour was modelled during a potential outage situation when all combustion equipment is off-line. Draft induced fans would continue to operate and draw air from the tipping building, through the system and vented out of the stack. The worst-case odour concentration was 0.11 Odour Unit (OU) per cubic metre (ou/m3) which is well below the MECP POI limit of 1 ou/m3 (10-minute average) at all off property receptors. To verify the initial modelling, a one-time odour sampling was undertaken in October 2015 by Zorix Consultants Inc. in accordance with the Ontario Source Testing Code Method ON-6. As the tipping building was identified as the principal source of fugitive odours, triplicate samples were collected from the area. The air samples were analyzed by an 8-member odour panel to determine the typical odour source concentration. Dispersion of worst-case potential odours through the stack during a 2-hr outage was modelled using the (CALMET/CALPUFF) dispersion model as approved under Schedule B of the DYEC ECA. According to the model, the maximum, 10-minute odour concentration at a sensitive receptor was 0.28 OU and occurred at a former house to the west of the facility. This result was well below the compliance limit of 1.0 OU. Page 51 Page 48 of 138 Based on the results of odour sampling undertaken in 2015 which verified the 2011 modelling, there is not expected to be an increase in odour due to the increase in capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year. The facility has been designed to manage waste in enclosed buildings which effectively contain odours. The tipping building and waste storage pit will continue to be maintained under negative pressure. Air drawn in from the tipping floor and waste storage pit areas will be used for combustion air, where odourous air will be drawn into the furnace and destroyed though high temperature oxidation. The truck entrance and exit doors and louvers will continue to be closed when there are no deliveries of waste to the facility. The amount of waste being stored onsite at any one time will not change with the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. The processing of an additional 20,000 tonnes per year may result in up to four additional trucks per day, including waste delivery, reagent delivery and residual removal vehicles. There will be no outdoor staging of waste. Additionally, staff periodically review the conditions at the perimeter of the facility to determine if detectable odours are present at the property boundary. It is important to note that since DYEC operations commenced in 2016, all the odour investigations completed by the DYEC staff, in conjunction with the MECP, have concluded that reported odour events have not been a result of operations at the DYEC. Based on the review of the initial EA, odour impact mitigation design features of the DYEC and recent sampling, no significant negative effects from odour will result from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. 3.8.2 Noise Acoustic Assessment Reports were completed for the 2009 EA and for the initial ECA application and an updated Acoustic Assessment was undertaken in 2019: The Acoustic Assessment –Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-5) Acoustic Assessment Report (Golder, 2011 Durham York Energy Centre ECA Application, Air and Noise, Page 52 Page 49 of 138 Find link: Here Annual Noise Monitoring of the Durham York Energy Centre Operations (Valcoustics Canada Limited, 2017) Acoustic Assessment Report (AAR) - Durham York Energy Centre (Golder Associates Limited, 2021) Appendix D Evaluations were completed for two design capacity scenarios for the DYEC. These are the initial design capacity of 140,000 tonnes per year and a maximum design capacity of 400,000 tonnes per year. The report includes consideration of: Existing ambient acoustical environment; Sound from the facility construction; Sound from the facility operations; Potential impacts of sound on wildlife in addition to human receptors; and Mitigation measures to limit and manage potential effects. The noise assessment was designed to assess the potential effects of the DYEC relative to the applicable regulatory requirements. In 2009, MECP Noise Pollution Control (NPC) documents 205/232/233 were in effect. Evaluations of potential noise effects during the initial construction and operations were conducted which considered both the 140,000 tonnes per year and 400,000 tonnes per year scenarios. The technical study concluded that the DYEC is located in a Class 2 (suburban) area with acoustical qualities representative of both Class 1 (urban) and Class 3 (rural) areas. Class 2 sound levels are characteristic of Class 1 areas during the daytime with background sound levels dominated by an urban hum. At nighttime, Class 2 areas have a low sound level dominated by natural environment and infrequent human activity noises. Nighttime sound levels in a Class 2 area can start as early as 1900 hours. The technical study was conducted in July 2009 and the DYEC was predicted to meet all NPC-205 noise limits when operating at both the 140,000 tonnes per year and 400,000 tonnes per year scenarios. The technical study predicted noise mitigation might Page 53 Page 50 of 138 be required for the emergency generators and fire pumps but not for the regularly operating equipment. In 2011, an additional acoustic assessment was completed in support of the ECA application for the DYEC. This acoustic assessment incorporated changes and refinements which were not initially known during the 2009 acoustic assessment undertaken in support of the EA. Proposed DYEC equipment assessed in this study included roof ventilation units on the main building and residue building, the closed-loop cooling water cooler, silo filling, silo dust collector, loader operations, bay doors and process louvers. The worst-case daytime operating scenario has all sources and both boiler trains operating simultaneously. This included ten trucks entering and exiting the DYEC per hour. Standby equipment was tested in a separate hour during the day. The worst-case nighttime /evening operating scenario had all sources and both boiler trains operating simultaneously, but did not include silo filling, dust collection operations, on-site traffic, tipping hall bay doors remained closed and no standby equipment operating. Three locations were identified as the most sensitive points of reception near the DYEC: Two-storey single family dwelling located approximately 480 metres from the property line west of the facility. Two-storey single family dwelling approximately 690 metres from the property line west of the facility. One-storey single family dwelling approximately 870 metres from the property line north of the facility. Sound levels from the DYEC at these identified sensitive points of reception were predicted to be at or below the applicable sound level limits as specified in NPC-205 during the predictable worst-case hour of the DYEC normal operation and during the testing of the standby diesel generator or diesel fire pumps. Given the nature of the activities at the facility, noise impacts are minimal. There is no grinding, shredding or other pre-processing of the waste and noise mitigation measures Page 54 Page 51 of 138 were installed for the emergency generator and fire water pumps. An emergency generator is located outside, west of the tipping building and is equipped with an acoustic enclosure including air intake/discharge silencers and an engine exhaust muffler. The fire water pumps are housed in a building near the southeast corner of the site and are fitted with exhaust mufflers. The DYEC operating procedures require that weekly testing of the emergency generator and fire pumps only occurs during business hours (0700 to 1900) and only for a thirty-minute duration. The equipment is not tested at the same time to further reduce noise impacts. In 2013, MECP released new noise guidelines in the publication NPC-300 Environmental Noise Guideline, Stationary and Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning. NPC-300 was designed to limit the conflicts between NPC-205/232 and land use planning requirements. NPC-300 introduces new sound level limits, a new protocol for assessing impulse sounds and a requirement to consider hypothetical, potential points of reception on vacant lands that might permit a sound-sensitive land use in the future. The ECA for the facility required an acoustic audit after construction and during normal operations. An Acoustic Audit Report was prepared in January 2017 by Valcoustics Canada Limited (Valcoustics) based on field work completed in 2016. The Acoustic Audit provided a determination of facility sound levels during peak facility activity with both boilers operating at full thermal load. The acoustic audit also provided an assessment of the DYEC sound classification based on the surrounding site activity in 2016. Noise was assessed at three receptor locations. Audit measurements were also completed in the vicinity of these receptors. One two-storey receptor dwelling was demolished as part of the 401/418 interchange and road realignment project. However, a two-storey farmhouse, identified as POR001rev, approximately 1100 metres to the west of the DYEC property line was assessed to maintain consistency with the report. Another receptor, a two-storey family dwelling, identified as POR002, is located 690 metres east of the DYEC property line. And a third receptor, identified as POR003, is 860 metres north of the DYEC. The results of the acoustic assessment found that the Page 55 Page 52 of 138 DYEC facility was not audible in the vicinity of POR001rev, POR002 and POR003 in September 2016 which is consistent with previous post-operational monitoring periods. These observations were made during the daytime period (0700 to 1900 hours). Additionally, during lulls in road traffic on Highway 401 (the dominant noise source at all locations), the DYEC was not audible. Based on sound measurements and subjective observations, Valcoustics determined that the DYEC area should be considered a Class 1 (urban) area that is dominated by “urban hum”. The key difference between criteria for Class 1 (urban) compared to Class 2 (suburban) areas is the sound level limits applicable in the evening between 1900 and 2300 hours. Class 2 (suburban) areas have lower sound level limits after 1900 hours. Despite the determination that the DYEC area is now a Class 1 (urban) area, the 2016 audit compared the sound levels to Class 2 (suburban) limits to be consistent with the 2009 EA and the ECA application. Off-site sound levels from the DYEC are continuous with short-term or transient activities such as truck movements or fire water pump testing not discernable off-site. The 2016 acoustic audit demonstrated that the sound levels from the facility were not audible during the September 2016 post-operational measurement period. Valcoustics determined that the DYEC activities are within the sound level limits stated in the MECP Publication NPC-205 and concluded that the DYEC remains in compliance with NPC-205, the updated NPC-300 and the ECA. In 2016, the MECP revoked the requirement to conduct further acoustic audit measurements. No construction or additional equipment is necessary to increase the capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year. Therefore, sound levels are not expected to increase and the DYEC, operations will continue not to be audible at off-site receptors. It is anticipated that up to four additional trucks will access the site daily. However, since truck traffic is not discernible at off-site sensitive receptors, the increased traffic is not anticipated to negatively affect sound levels. Further, waste deliveries are restricted in the ECA to 0700 to 1900 hours meaning there will be no truck traffic after 1900 hours when the Page 56 Page 53 of 138 sound level limits for Class 2 (suburban) areas are lowered. The DYEC is located in the Clarington Energy Business Park which is designated for employment and light industrial land use and it is unlikely that new sensitive noise receptors would be constructed with this land use designation. There are no noise impacts to the natural environment from the DYEC capacity increase. Since DYEC operations commenced in 2016, there have been no noise complaints attributed to the operation of the facility. Based on the review of the initial EA, the acoustic assessment for ECA application and subsequent acoustic assessments, no significant negative effects from noise are anticipated from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. However, as a result of consultation with the MECP on the screening checklist, the need for an updated acoustic assessment was identified. Based on the results from the updated acoustic assessment undertaken in 2019 by Golder, noise emissions associated with Facility operations continue operate in compliance with MECP noise guideline as specified in NPC 300. Results of the 2019 Acoustic Assessment are discussed in Section 4. 3.8.3 Stack Emissions The Environmental Screening Criteria Checklist indicates that the waste capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year could result in potential impacts to air. Air emissions are a primary concern of most stakeholders. In 2011, in support of the ECA, an Emissions Summary Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) report was completed to determine the potential for impacts at several receptors surrounding the facility. This was also a supporting component of a Human Health and Environmental Risk Assessment completed for the facility. The Air Quality Assessment Technical Study (Appendix C-1 of the 2009) Environment Assessment report undertaken in 2009 during the initial EA predicted the contaminant emissions from the DYEC at both the 140,000 tonnes per year and 400,000 tonnes per Page 57 Page 54 of 138 year scenarios. The assessments were carried out using the approved (CALMET/CALPUFF) air quality modelling system. The Air Quality Assessment Technical Study in support of the initial EA stated: “The Facility emissions (for both the 140,000 tonnes per year and 400,000 tonnes per year scenarios) will meet or be below the current air contaminant emissions limits placed on municipal waste incinerators by the current version of Ministry of Environment (MOE) Guideline A-7 dated (2004). This will be verified through continuous monitoring of stack emissions and annual stack tests.” Guideline A-7 was updated in 2010 and was considered in the DYEC ECA application. Stack testing has been performed twice per year since the commencement of facility operations which have demonstrated facility compliance well within Guideline A-7 limits. Schedule C of the Environmental Compliance Approval (Certificate #7306-8FDKNX) for the DYEC issued June 28, 2011, established the DYEC stack emission limits which are in many instances more stringent, than the most current A-7 Guideline. The table below compares Guideline A-7 limits to the DYEC prescribed In-Stack Emission Limits. Table 3: Guideline A-7 limits compared to the DYEC prescribed In-Stacked Emission Limits Pollutant Units Previous A-7 (2004) CurrentA-7 (2010) ECA- Schedule C particulate matter (PM) mg/Rm3 17 14 9 cadmium ug/Rm3 14 7 7 lead ug/Rm3 142 60 50 mercury ug/Rm3 20 20 15 dioxins and furans pg/Rm3 80 80 60 hydrochloric acid (HCl) mg/Rm3 27 27 9 sulphur dioxide (SOx) mg/Rm3 56 56 35 nitrogen oxide (NOx) mg/Rm3 207 198 121 Page 58 Page 55 of 138 Pollutant Units Previous A-7 (2004) CurrentA-7 (2010) ECA- Schedule C organic matter (methane) mg/Rm3 66 33 33 carbon monoxide (CO) mg/Rm3 not specified 40 40 Opacity % 10 10 10 Opacity % 5 5 5 Stack testing has been undertaken twice annually since 2016. Testing for all parameters have complied with Schedule-C of the ECA since 2016, with the exception of one exceedance of Dioxins and Furans, which occurred in Boiler #1 during the May 2016 stack test. In this instance the affected boiler was shut down and an Abatement Plan was established in consultation with the MECP detailing the process to investigate and prevent a future occurrence of the incident. The Plan was undertaken and there has not been a reoccurring exceedance in any subsequent stack test. Results of the stack testing can be found on the DYEC website: Stack Testing Results. After five years of stack testing, DYEC has been able to demonstrate it can meet the A-7 Guideline. Stack testing Results are further discussed in Section 4. In support of the Environmental Screening Process, Golder Associates undertook and Air Quality Impact Assessment (AQIA) in 2021 to evaluate the potential impacts to facility emissions as a result of processing an additional 20,000 tonnes of waste for a total of 160,000 tonnes per year. The AQIA was undertaken using the same modelling system used in previous air quality studies for DYEC (e.g., ESDM Golder, 2011) for consistency with previous modelling exercises, and due to the height of the stack and the proximity to Lake Ontario. The AQIA can be found in Appendix E The results of the AQIA modelling assessment indicated that the 160 ,000 tonnes per year would result in a small overall change in the maximum predicted concentrations for all contaminants and the change in cumulative concentrations would be even less significant. Results of the AQIA are discussed in Sections 4 and 5. Page 59 Page 56 of 138 An updated ESDM report is required to demonstrate compliance with O. Reg. 419/05 air quality limits, as documented in the Air Contaminants Benchmark List (MECP, 2018). The list contains standards and guidelines for contaminants is used to assess their contributions of a contaminant to air as part of an ESDM report to support an ECA Application To address comments made by the MECP, via memo dated October 22, 2019, the new modelling has been done based on the consultation with the MECP. An ECA amendment application, including updated ESDM report, will be prepared following the completion and submission of the ESR to the MECP 3.8.4 Process Upset Conditions The Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) measures parameters on a continuous basis to maximize facility performance and minimize atmospheric effects. Two ambient air monitoring stations in the vicinity of the DYEC have been in place since 2013. These stations monitor air quality surrounding the facility. Quarterly and annual monitoring reports have been submitted to the MECP since 2013 and are posted on the DYEC website: DYEC Ambient Air Monitoring Reports. Ambient air monitoring cannot determine the source(s) in the event of an exceedance of one of the monitored parameters. However, meteorological data such a wind direction and wind speed from both stations, combined with public data posted to the MECP Air Quality Ontario website can aid in the determination of potential source(s) of a contaminant. Since the ambient air stations have been operational, there have been no incidents where DYEC operations were anticipated to have resulted in and exceedance of the Ambient Air Quality Criteria (AAQC). Ambient air monitoring results are discussed further in Section 4. The Air Quality Assessment Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-1) undertaken in 2009 for the initial EA predicted the potential effects to ambient air. The assessment compared the maximum model-predicted concentrations to ambient air Page 60 Page 57 of 138 criteria for both the 140,000 tonnes per year and 400,000 tonnes per year scenarios. The assessment was conservative as it assumed the worst-case operating scenario with the highest potential to cause environmental effects. It is possible for emissions levels to be higher than those during normal operation due to various operating conditions such as start-ups, shutdowns and malfunctions of the combustion units or the APC equipment. These events are expected to occur infrequently over a short period of time. Using the methods prescribed to evaluate potential changes to air quality due to process upset conditions in the initial EA, the results predicted when cumulative environmental effects were considered by adding background levels to the maximum predicted ground level concentration for each Chemical of Potential Concern (CoPC), the predicted maximum ground level concentrations were still below the applicable criteria. The results of the cumulative assessment in the Golder AQIA discussed above represent a very conservative scenario as they assume that the worst-case meteorological conditions during 90th percentile ambient air quality conditions occur at the same time that maximum on-site activities occur. This same level of conservatism was used in the Air Quality Assessment Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-1) undertaken in 2009 for the initial EA. The likelihood of these situations occurring concurrently is low. The results of the AQIA are discussed in more detail in Section 4 and 5. 3.8.5 Existing Operations at Elevated Throughput As part of the facility’s design, the boilers have the capacity to be operated at different steaming rates and tonnage throughput rates to allow the facility to adjust to variations in waste heat content and delivery rates. Between 2017 and the first half of 2019, the facility operated at rates greater than 33.6 tonnes of steam per hour with one or both boilers for at least one hour on a total of 387 days (234 in 2017, 124 in 2018, and 29 in the first half of 2019). The facility was capable at operating these elevated throughputs while maintaining compliance with the CEMS in stack limits. Any instances of ambient Page 61 Page 58 of 138 air exceedances detected during these periods were determined to be not related to plant operations. 3.8.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions The DYEC waste processing capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year will result in an increase in the total amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) generated by the facility due to the increase in the total mass of waste processed. However, this will be offset by the reduction of GHG emissions that has been associated with the transportation and disposal of waste to landfills outside the Regions (including landfill methane generation). Consequently, the DYEC waste capacity increase is anticipated to result in a net benefit to the environment in the form of an overall reduction of GHG emissions to atmosphere. Greenhouse gas emissions are a growing concern given their contribution to climate change. The net emissions of GHGs from thermal treatment of waste versus landfill disposal were assessed as part of the initial EA for the DYEC as per the document “Supplement to Annex E-5: Comparative Analysis of Thermal Treatment and Remote Landfill on a Lifecycle Basis”. This initial assessment indicated that the total GHG emissions from thermal treatment were less than those associated with landfilling and transportation related emissions and landfill methane generation. The Air Quality Technical Assessment (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-1) undertaken for the initial EA in 2009, predicted the DYEC contribution to the total Ontario and Canadian annual GHG contributions. The Air Quality Technical Assessment carried out GHG estimate for the 140,000 and 400,000 tonnes per year facilities based on the 2010 GHG emission levels in Canada and Ontario. The study predicted that the DYEC GHG contributions would be minimal relative to the Canadian and Ontario totals. The percent contribution from DYEC at 140,000 tonnes per year predicted in the 2009 Air Quality Technical Assessment was 0.06 per cent and 0.018 per cent of the Ontario and Canadian GHG contributions, respectively. Using the 2019 DYEC actual GHG contributions and the actual 2019 Canadian and 2019 Ontario GHG contributions, the initial study prediction is comparable, with the 2019 DYEC contribution Page 62 Page 59 of 138 calculated at 0.1 per cent and 0.02 per cent of the Ontario and Canadian GHG totals respectively. The DYEC reported a total CO2 equivalent emission of 159,545.40 tonnes in 2019 under Ontario Regulation 390/18: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Quantification, Reporting and Verification. The 2019 Ontario and Canadian GHG emissions contributions were reported on the Government of Canada website: Canadian and Ontario GHG contributions. The 2019 Canadian total was reported as 730 megatonnes (Mt) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq) and the 2019 Province of Ontario GHG total was reported as 163.2Mt of CO2eq. The actual DYEC GHG values from 2019 for the current 140,000 tonne facility was compared as a percentage of the Provincial and Canadian total GHG contributions. Assuming a linear projection of GHG contribution for 160,000 tonnes per year scenario, there is a 0.01 per cent difference to the Ontario GHG contribution as a result of the 20,000 tonnes per year waste capacity increase. There is no difference in the GHG contribution as a result of the additional 20,000 tonnes per year waste capacity increase. Table 4 below shows the DYEC reported GHG emissions as a percentage of the 2019 Canadian and Ontario contributions. Page 63 Page 60 of 138 Table 4: Projected Annual GHG contribution from DYEC GHG Contribution 2019 (tonnes CO2 eq) DYEC (Tonnes Processible) GHG Contribution (tonnes CO2 eq) % Contribution to Ontario GHG Emissions % Contribution to Canadian GHG Emissions Ontario 163,000,000 140,000 159,545 0.10% 0.02% Canada 730,000,000 160,000 182,337 0.11% 0.02% DYEC submits an annual Greenhouse Gas Report as required by Environment and Climate Change Canada under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. The information is collected under section 46 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act and reports are submitted annually in June. Facilities that emit 10,000 tonnes or more of GHGs in carbon dioxide equivalent units per year are required to submit a report. A summary of the DYEC CO2e Annual Emissions from 2015-2019 as reported under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program is charted below. Page 64 Page 61 of 138 Figure 3: A summary of the DYEC CO2e Annual Emissions from 2015-2019 An additional 20,000 tonnes per year of waste processed at the DYEC from the Regions, will remove or shorten the distance travelled by as much as 416 long haul trucks transporting waste for landfill disposal. In 2020, approximately 15,000 tonnes of waste were by-passed from DYEC, (15,000 tonnes/ 36 tonnes per long haul truck equals 416). DYEC by-passed waste has been shipped as far as Twin Creeks Landfill, over 300 kilometres from the DYEC. With an average transport truck fuel efficiency of 39.5 litres per 100 kilometres and an average of 2.62 kilograms of carbon dioxide (CO2) generated from the combustion of 1 litre of diesel fuel, this prevents approximately 98,592 litres of diesel fuel being burned annually, avoiding the generation of 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 DYEC CO2e Annual Emissions Total CO2e Reportable CO2e (non-biogenic) MSW, tonnes rec'd (from annual reports) Page 65 Page 62 of 138 approximately 258 tonnes of CO2 as well as other transportation related emissions (Fuel Efficiency Benchmarking in Canada’s Trucking Industry, 2019). https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/efficiency/transportation/commercial- vehicles/reports/7607 Methane (CH4) is generated from the landfilling of waste and according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), methane has twenty-five times the global warming potential of CO2 over a 100-year time horizon. It is accepted that 1 kilogram of methane produces approximately 25 kilograms of CO2. Government of Canada Climate Change Potentials. If the 20,000 tonnes per year were landfilled without methane gas capture systems in place, approximately 890 tonnes of methane would be generated equivalent to over 22,000 tonnes of CO2. Alternatively, 356 tonnes of methane would be generated equivalent to 8,800 tonnes of CO2. While modern landfills capture and either flare or use the methane to produce electricity, landfill gas capture systems are not capable of intercepting all produced methane. The “Supplement to Annex E-5: Comparative Analysis of Thermal Treatment and Remote Landfill on a Lifecycle Basis” assumed a 60 per cent recovery from landfill using gas capture. With this assumption approximately 534 tonnes of methane would be captured. To clarify, collection efficiency is difficult to measure directly. With improvements in technology, the typical values of the estimated collection efficiency on average are approximately 70 per cent. Based on current research recovery rate ranges from 60-70 percentile (Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering Columbia University 2019) https://gwcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Methane-Emissions-from-Landfills- Haokai-Zhao.pdf Page 66 Page 63 of 138 3.9 Natural Environment A review was completed of the following 2009 study that was undertaken during the initial Environmental Assessment to confirm: (a) the potential aquatic and terrestrial impacts associated with the development of a Proposed Thermal Treatment Facility (the Facility) on the Facility Site (the Site), Clarington 01; (b) potential mitigation required; and, (c) potential net effects and impact management measures. The Natural Environment Assessment - Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-7) The 2009 Natural Environment Assessment was undertaken assuming a disturbed area or “footprint” equal to a design capacity of 400,000 tonnes per year and listed the following study conclusions: No rare or threatened species were present on the site. This determination will not change with an increase in waste capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year. No significant natural areas were present. This determination will not change with an increase in waste capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year. Tooley Creek Coastal Wetland was identified as the closest Natural Area. The DYEC and haul routes are located at a minimum 0.87 km from any natural area and these areas should not be directly impacted by the development of the facility. Given there will not be any new construction or site alterations for the waste capacity increase, Tooley Creek will not be impacted. No permanent watercourses were found onsite and no significant net effects on aquatic species were anticipated. This assessment continues to be valid for the increased capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year. No significant ecosystems or vegetation were present on site. Native shrubs and trees were incorporated into the landscape plan for the facility to mitigate any potential minor impact. There will not be any changes to the current native shrubs and trees for the increase to 160,000 tonnes per year. Page 67 Page 64 of 138 No significant avian species were present, and no net effects were anticipated. A follow up Site Reconnaissance Study was undertaken in 2011 and observed ten species of birds onsite. All the observed species were common and widespread in Ontario and neither were listed under the federal Species at Risk Act or the provincial Endangered Species Act. These same bird species were noted in the Natural Environment Technical Study Report (2009). As a result of the above findings, there were no negative effects to the natural environment anticipated with the original facility construction with the implementation of mitigation measures. No additional construction, structures or landscape alternations are required for the capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year at the Durham York Energy Centre. No significant forested areas or permanent watercourses exist on the Site. The flat, open terrain and lack of cover offer few opportunities for specialized habitat or species. No species of conservation concern were documented during the 2007 field surveys. Subsequent supplementary field surveys in 2009 targeted seasonally sensitive species and features that might not have been present or evident during previous field visits. All plants and animals identified were common and widespread in Ontario. Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Meadowlark Clarington Energy Business Park and Energy from Waste Facility Development Plan Monitoring Reports for Eastern Meadowlark. The Regional Municipality of Durham completed the development of a 12.1 ha parcel immediately north of the CN rail line on the west side of Osborne Road for an Energy from Waste (EFW) facility. To service the EFW site within the Energy Park lands the Region has constructed new roads with associated services including water and sanitary and storm sewers for all the lands west of Osborne Road. The work involved the realignment of Courtice Road, realignment of Darlington Park Road, and the new Page 68 Page 65 of 138 construction of Energy Drive, truck access road to the EFW facility, stormwater conveyance channel and waterfront trail. Eastern Meadowlark and their habitat were identified at the Clarington Energy Business Park and EFW sites and the works that were completed to construct these facilities contravened the protection and recovery of Eastern Meadowlark and its habitat pursuant to Section10(1)(a) of the Endangered Species Act, 2007. In a letter dated April 16, 2013, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) informed the Regional Municipality of Durham (the Region) that they were eligible to submit a Development Plan under Section 23.2 of Ontario Regulation 242/08 of the Endangered Species Act, 2007. In accordance with the direction provided by the MNRF, a Development Plan was prepared and submitted to address activities for both the CEBP and EFW facility (Durham Region 2013). In accordance with the CEBP and EFW facility Development Plan (Durham Region 2013): The Region of Durham or its agent agrees to maintain an ongoing logbook of actions in an annual report which will be submitted to the MNR by January 31st of each monitoring year for 5 years, beginning January 31, 2014 up to and including January 31, 2018. To be included are the details of information collected from the annual monitoring of Eastern Meadowlark, associated bird species, and habitat creation and maintenance activities (vegetation monitoring). Following the construction of the DYEC, a specialized firm, LGL Limited, was retained by the Regions to monitor and make recommendations to improve grassland habitats for select avian species of concern, notably the Eastern Meadowlark. As part of the Region’s commitment to carrying out restoration and monitoring in accordance with the requirements of the Development Plan under Section 23.2 of Ontario Regulation 242/08 of the Endangered Species Act, 2007, adaptive management was undertaken in 2014 to combat the presence of non-native and invasive herbaceous broadleaf species within the Restoration Area. However, additional management efforts Page 69 Page 66 of 138 were necessary in 2015 which included the use of herbicide to aid in reducing populations of herbaceous, broadleaf species which negatively impacted the establishment of preferred, sown grasses. Habitat conditions in 2015 were observed as grass dominated meadow with an approximate grass cover of 60% to 70%, which included more than three grass species, as well as grasses that grew to heights greater than 50 cm. Consequently, no adaptive management was recommended for the 2016 growing season. Vegetation monitoring in 2016 and in 2017 continued to conclude that the community within the Restoration Area was dominated by preferred grass species (70 per cent), thus community attributes continued to satisfy Ontario Regulation 242/08 (ESA 2007). Mowing and biomass removal was conducted in September 2017 based on wildlife observations made in 2017. Mowing in 2017 resulted in improved vegetation conditions and mitigated the establishment of woody species in 2018. The grass dominated habitat in 2018 continues to meet conditions set out for Eastern Meadowlark in the ESA 2007. Despite site conditions and restoration efforts considered favourable for the Eastern Meadowlarks, none were identified within the restoration area during the 2018 breeding bird surveys. However, Bobolink, a species which has been identified as endangered, with relatively distinct grassland habitat requirements was noted in the restoration area during the 2018 breeding bird surveys. Bobolinks were recorded during two of three surveys, indicating probable breeding status within the restoration area. The presence of this species during 2016, 2017 and 2018 suggests that restoration goals have been achieved and that functional grassland bird habitat has been created. It is expected that the established vegetation composition will increase the likelihood of Eastern Meadowlark using habitats within the Restoration Area in the future. Monitoring conducted by our consultant in 2018 was the 5th and final year of monitoring as per Development Plan (#AU-DP-004-13). LGL did not recommend any additional vegetation restoration or maintenance under Region contract as they reported that grassland creation objectives have been met. The established restoration area will not be impacted by the capacity increase. Page 70 Page 67 of 138 3.10 Resources Review of the following studies that were undertaken during the initial Environmental Assessment show there are no negative effects to Resources as outlined in the screening criteria checklist: Facility Energy and Life-Cycle Assessment - Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009 Appendix C -3) The study was prepared to identify the potential energy benefits and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) parameters (GHG emissions, Air emissions, Water emissions) associated with the Proposed Thermal Treatment Facility (the Facility). The Report forms part of the supporting documentation and materials for the “Description of the Undertaking”, completed as part of the EA Study. The Report addresses the broader implications of the proposed Facility, in regard to the environmental burden of the Facility at a global or macro-environmental scale. Environmental Compliance Approval Application Design and Operations Report (Golder Associates, 2011) The DYEC is in a designated employment and light industrial area and this land use continues to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement as revised in 2014 Part V Section (1). Positive effects on Resources were identified through the study review. Approval for additional waste processing capacity is in keeping with the recent MECP discussion paper: “Reducing Litter and Waste in Our Communities” (2019) This paper lists the following points, which directly support increasing waste processing capacity at DYEC: Ontario needs to find innovative ways to reduce waste sent to landfill. Thermal treatment in the form of energy from waste is a potential opportunity to recover the value of resources in waste. Page 71 Page 68 of 138 Sending waste to landfill is economically inefficient and unsustainable. It puts a strain on our environment by taking up valuable land resources that could be used more productively. By reducing and diverting waste from landfill we can make our economy more productive through job creation. Reducing our reliance on landfills is an important part of meeting the greenhouse gas emission target outlined in the Made-in-Ontario Environment Plan. Sending waste to landfill also impacts local communities. Municipalities, often in rural areas, are hosting landfills that accept waste from locations far beyond their communities, often with limited say in their approvals. Residents, businesses, institutions and governments alike are moving towards viewing waste as a resource that has value and can be integrated back into the economy. Moving Ontario to where we produce less waste, maximize the resources from waste through reuse, recycling, or other means such as thermal treatment, and ultimately send less of our waste to landfill. Based on the review of the initial EA and MECP policy direction, no significant negative effects to resources will result from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. 3.11 Socio-Economic Review of the following studies that were prepared in 2009 during the initial Environmental Assessment were undertaken. Economic Assessment - Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009 Appendix C-11) Socio-Cultural Assessment - Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009 Appendix C-8) Traffic Assessment - Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009 Appendix C-10) Page 72 Page 69 of 138 Visual Assessment - Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009 Appendix C-6) Record of Consultation from initial EA One potential effect as outlined in the screening criteria checklist was identified. The DYEC is within 8 kilometers of a helipad located at the Bowmanville Hospital. Although air ambulance service is currently suspended to the hospital, it is anticipated that a relocated helipad will be established in the future. The DYEC already has aeronautical clearance from Navigation Canada as constructed. With no new construction or increase in stack height, there are no negative effects related to the proximity of a helipad in the Bowmanville area. 3.11.1 Economic Assessment The Economic Assessment – Technical Study Report was completed in 2009 to support the Environmental Assessment for the DYEC. The report was prepared to assess the potential economic related effects associated with the development of the DYEC, potential mitigation required and net effects. Evaluations were completed for the 140,000 tonnes per year and 400,000 tonnes per year design scenarios. Since the increase in capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year does not require any new construction, the economic effects during construction do not need to be re-evaluated in this summary. The objectives of the economic assessment are to summarize the existing economic conditions and assess the economic effects of the project during construction, operations and post closure based on the following socio-economic measures: Employment levels; Aggregate wages and salaries; Effects on property value; Municipal revenues and expenditures; Effects on existing businesses; and Business opportunities. Page 73 Page 70 of 138 Employment Levels/Aggregate Wages and Salaries The economic conditions in Durham Region have changed since the original assessment was completed in 2009. The economic downturn in 2009 and loss of manufacturing throughout Ontario impacted Durham and York Region manufacturing industry as well. In Durham Region the health sciences, retail, education, and energy sectors continue to be primary employers. In June 2019, Ontario Power Generation (OPG) announced the construction of a new consolidated headquarters building to be located in the Clarington Energy Business Park, northeast of the DYEC. The OPG office consolidation will increase the energy sector employment in the Region. In October 2019, East Penn Canada Power Battery Sales Ltd requested amendments to Energy Park Prestige Exception (MO2-1) Zone regulations to permit a warehousing facility and office space. The facility is located north of the DYEC was constructed during 2020/2021 and is scheduled to begin operation fall of 2021. The continued operation of the DYEC and increase in capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year will have minimal effect on the overall employment conditions, wages, and salaries in the Region. No new employment is anticipated to support this capacity increase. Effects on Property Value and Existing Businesses Industrial property values are anticipated to increase with the district heating potential and road infrastructure provided as part of the DYEC construction. All property in the Durham Energy Business Park is zoned for light industrial usage however it is expected that agricultural uses will continue until industrial activities expand further in the area. Residential and agricultural property values are not expected to be adversely affected by the DYEC capacity increase. Potential disruption to the use and enjoyment of businesses and agricultural farms due to odour, noise, dust, traffic and visual aesthetics were evaluated as part of the technical study. Mitigation measures were put in place during the initial facility Page 74 Page 71 of 138 construction to minimize off-property impacts. Odour control measures include off- loading waste in an enclosed building under negative pressure and all operations take place indoors. Dust impacts are also mitigated by paved surfaces and indoor off-loading of waste. Visual impacts of the DYEC are mitigated by the neutral colour choices for the exterior, extensive landscaping, and unobtrusive exterior lighting. Several architectural enhancements were identified and incorporated during the DYEC’s initial construction to minimize any potential negative effects. The emissions stack is the most significant visual impact of the facility and its impact will continue to be minimized as the Highway 407 East construction is completed and as additional multi-level buildings are constructed in the Clarington Energy Business Park. Noise assessments completed since the facility has been operational indicate all noise levels are well below MECP regulated limits. Municipal Revenues and Expenditures The DYEC has an overall positive impact on municipal revenues. Based on the host community agreement with the Municipality of Clarington, payment in lieu of taxes are approximately $650,000 per year. There was also significant investment in developing the infrastructure of the Clarington Energy Business Park during the DYEC construction. The Municipality of Clarington will benefit further as industry continues to move into the Clarington Energy Business Park. Changes to demands on local services have been minimal since most DYEC employees were already living in the Region of Durham. The capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year from the current 140,000 tonnes per year waste processing will result in cost savings for the Region of Durham. Reduced Covanta operating fees for waste tonnages greater than 140,000 tonnes per year, increased revenue for electricity and metals recovery and preventing the need to by- pass waste to other disposal options will result in up to $1.3 million in annual savings in 2020 rising to $2.1 million by 2023. DYEC capacity growth along with other Regional programs and initiatives in waste management is critical to ensure that sufficient Page 75 Page 72 of 138 infrastructure and waste processing capacity exists to support Regional population growth projections. Business Opportunities The potential for district heating within the Clarington Energy Business Park and the enhanced road infrastructure, provide an incentive for businesses to locate in the area. OPG has recently announced the construction of a consolidated headquarters building that will be adjacent to the Darlington Energy Complex as well, East Penn Canada Power Battery Sales Ltd is has constructed office and warehousing operations in the area. Overall, the DYEC has had a net positive impact on the economics of the local municipality and minimal impact at the Regional level. Based on the review of the initial EA and recent announcements of investment in the Clarington Energy Business Park, no significant negative effects to the local economy will result from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. 3.11.2 Socio-Cultural Assessment The Social-Cultural Assessment Technical Study Report that was completed in 2009, assessed the effects of the facility on the people and community within the areas surrounding the DYEC site for both the 140,000 tonnes per year and 400,000 tonnes per year scenarios. Since the site is primarily surrounded by industrial and agricultural land uses and the nearest residential development is approximately three kilometres away, the impact of the DYEC on local community character is considered minor. Only two public facilities are located in the vicinity of the DYEC and neither are considered sensitive community uses. New development will be constructed after any changes and under MECP proposed Land Use Compatibility Guidelines (LUC’s) the developer will be responsible for completing compatibility studies. All waste management at DYEC is conducted in enclosed building areas which minimizes the odour, dust and visual impacts of the site activities. The DYEC operations are not considered to have a negative effect on the local community character or the use of public facilities. The site Page 76 Page 73 of 138 is designated employment/ light industrial land use in both the Durham Region and Clarington Official Plans. The DYEC is located on a portion of land that has been designated the Clarington Energy Business Park. The Social-Cultural Assessment also considered the effect of the DYEC on the enjoyment of cultural and recreational resources. Four recreational uses are located within the study area including the Waterfront Trail, the Darlington Sports Fields, the Lake Ontario waterfront and Darlington Provincial Park. Negative effects on the use of these recreational areas have been and will continue to be minimal given the indoor operations of the facility. There are minor visual impacts of the facility since it is visible within a one-kilometre radius. During construction, a $9 million cash allowance was included to incorporate visually pleasing design features to minimize the negative visual effect of the DYEC. Changes to Land Use Since the 2009 Environmental Assessment Technical Studies were completed, the following changes have occurred to the DYEC surrounding land use. The Darlington Energy Complex was completed, located at the southeast corner of Energy Drive and Osbourne Road, directly east of the DYEC; Manheim Oshawa Auctions is no longer located north of the DYEC; Two former residences located near the DYEC have been demolished; W ork has been completed on the new 418 interchange and connector highway between Highway 401 and the 407 East extension, as well as the 401 interchange for Courtice Road. East Penn Canada Battery Distribution Centre is scheduled to commence operation in fall of 2021 The Social-Cultural Assessment reached the following conclusions based on the review of 2009 Technical Studies completed for Air Quality, Visual Impacts, Traffic Impacts, the Acoustic Assessment, litter and vermin evaluations, and the design proposal submitted by Covanta. There are little to no differences between the potential effects at the Page 77 Page 74 of 138 140,000 tonnes per year scenario versus the 400,000 tonnes per year scenario. Therefore, the conclusions presented below are considered valid for both scenarios and apply to the 160,000 tonnes per year scenario: Considering no residential receptors are located within 500 metres, the DYEC is anticipated to have minimal overall net effects regarding the “Potential for Disruption to use and enjoyment of residential properties”. Considering the significant distance from the DYEC to the nearest existing and planned communities and the characteristics of the current landscape, the DYEC is anticipated to have minimal to no overall net effects regarding the “Potential for changes in Community Character”. The DYEC will be one contributor to the transition of the immediate area to commercial/light industrial land use in accordance with the planned development of the Clarington Energy Business Park. Considering that there are only two Public Facilities or Institutions within one kilometre, the DYEC is anticipated to have minimal overall net effects regarding the “Potential for Disruption to Use and Enjoyment of Public Facilities or Institutions”. Considering the limited number and type of recreational land uses in close proximity, the DYEC is anticipated to have minimal overall net effects regarding the “Potential for Disruption to Use and Enjoyment of Cultural and Recreational Resources”. Considering the existing and proposed land use designations, the DYEC is anticipated to have minimal overall net effects regarding the “Compatibility with Existing Land Use Designations and Proposed Land Use Changes”. The DYEC is and will continue to be compatible with the existing landscape character and zoning of the Clarington Energy Business Park. The increased processing capacity, if approved, will occur within the existing structure onsite, no changes to land, or new construction will be undertaken for the project therefore no impacts are anticipated. Page 78 Page 75 of 138 The Durham-York Energy from Waste Facility Business Case (May 15, 2008), prepared for the Region of Durham by Deloitte and Touche LLP, noted that the inclusion of district heating and site works associated with the development of the DYEC within the Clarington Energy Business Park would result in a positive effect for enterprises looking to locate their businesses in Clarington. This would essentially increase the compatibility of the DYEC with the current and future land uses in the vicinity which are likely to include commercial and light industrial uses that could benefit from the availability of district heating and potentially district cooling provided. The Region is currently conducting pre-feasibility studies related to further developing a district energy system within the Energy Park. Based on the review of the initial EA and recent announcements of investment in the Clarington Energy Business Park, no significant negative effects to the local social and cultural environment will result from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. 3.11.3 Traffic Assessment The Traffic Assessment Technical Study from the 2009 EA was reviewed. For the purpose of this traffic assessment, a ten-year horizon period was selected to assess future traffic conditions. The DYEC was expected to be operational by 2013, thus a 2023 horizon year reflects an appropriate assessment horizon (10 years from beginning of operations). The purpose of the study was to identify and address potential traffic effects that could result from the construction of the DYEC including: Assess existing traffic conditions at the study area intersections; Forecast future traffic demands as a result of the DYEC construction; Forecast future planned roadway network improvements and background travel demands, specifically generated by the future Clarington Energy Business Park; and, Page 79 Page 76 of 138 Identify operational concerns and recommend required mitigation measures to address potential deficiencies and meet the future traffic demand generated by the DYEC. Three waste capacity scenarios for the DYEC were reviewed (140,000, 250,000, and 400,000 tonnes per year) and analyzed in terms of traffic operations and effects on adjacent roads. The initial traffic assessment was based on the morning and evening road peak hours on a weekday, as this is generally the simultaneous peak for both commuter and site traffic. Traffic effects were based on the observed and forecast traffic volumes for both the weekday morning and evening peak hours. A traffic assessment study of this nature is usually based on the forecasted traffic effects associated with the usual or typical traffic conditions that are to be experienced on a day-to-day basis at the DYEC during the morning and evening peak hours. A ten-year horizon period was selected to assess future traffic conditions. The study assumed up to 34 trucks per day at a design capacity of 140,000 tonnes per year; 51 daily truck trips at 250,000 tonnes per year; and 77 daily truck trips at 400,000 tonnes per year. The study assumed 18 trucks (inbound and outbound combined) and 22 cars during the peak hour operating at 140,000 tonnes per year. At 250,000 tonnes per year, peak hour traffic is anticipated to be 26 trucks and 22 cars, and at 400,000 tonnes per year, peak hour traffic is anticipated to be 40 trucks and 22 cars. In all three scenarios, no traffic control measures were required on the adjacent road network to accommodate traffic during operations of the DYEC. Traffic operations at the study area intersection were assessed with HCS software for unsignalized intersections. The signal warrant analysis did not require traffic signals at any of the intersections and traffic queues were not expected to extend to the Darlington Park Road and Courtice Road intersection. Overall, the studied intersections were found to operate acceptably in the morning and evening peak periods beyond the 2023 horizon year. The alternate truck Page 80 Page 77 of 138 access road to the DYEC removed truck traffic from Energy Drive, which increases safety along this corridor. As a result of changes to the development of the road network, the Traffic Assessment was updated in 2011. Changes included the DYEC truck access road no longer being Osbourne Road and instead is Courtice Road and an updated road network for the intersections of Courtice Road and Energy Drive as well as Energy Drive and Darlington Park Road. The updated 2011 Traffic Assessment noted only marginal changes in traffic volumes as a result of the changes to the road network. As the Highway 401 and 418 interchange was not finalized, the study did not include an assessment of traffic operations at the then proposed interchange. A 20,000 tonne per year capacity increase at DYEC will result in approximately four additional trucks per day including waste delivery, residuals removal and reagent delivery trucks accessing the facility. As a result of conservative assumptions made in the Traffic Assessment Study for the initial EA regarding the number of vehicles required to enter the facility on a daily basis, the total number of vehicles, including the additional trips required for the 20,000 tonnes per year increase, is anticipated to remain below the initial study numbers. Currently approximately 24 trucks and 21 cars enter the facility daily, where the initial EA Cars include staff operating the facility and Regional staff occupying the Visitors Centre. There are no concerns related to increase in vehicle traffic to the site as a result of processing an additional 20,000 tonnes per year. The site is capable of queuing eighteen tractor trailers within the security gates and additional ten tractor trailers on the private roadway located outside the security gates. Currently, there are never more than three tractor trailers queuing at one time. With sufficient roadway space on-site, trucks have never queued off-site. Operationally, the arrival of staff and deliveries to the facility frequently occurs outside of normal peak periods. Since the construction of the DYEC, OPG has announced an intention to develop an office campus northeast of the DYEC, for approximately 2,000 staff. The impacts of the proposed OPG offices on the local network are outside of the scope of this assessment. Page 81 Page 78 of 138 Based on the review of the initial EA and the actual truck traffic associated with the operational DYEC, no significant negative effects to local traffic will result from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. 3.11.4 Visual Assessment The 2009 Visual Assessment Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-6) outlines the scope of the visual assessment that has been completed for use in the initial Environmental Assessment and includes an assessment of the following: The sensitivity of the landscape and the identified receptors to the potential change in the visual aesthetics that could result from the development of the DYEC; The magnitude of the potential effects on the landscape and the identified receptors resulting from the development of the DYEC; and, The anticipated overall level of effect on each identified receptor. The initial phase of the visual impact assessment is a baseline study which describes the existing environment potentially affected within approximately one kilometre of the DYEC and within five kilometres of the DYEC. The visual impact assessment focuses on: Visibility of the DYEC structures; Effects on receptors; and, Local community viewshed analysis. The visual effects associated with the DYEC and specific facility structures that were considered during operation include the buildings and stack(s). Both the initial design capacity of 140,000 tonnes per year and potential future expansion to 400,000 tonnes per year were assessed. The 400,000 tonnes per year scenario would result in the addition of several facility buildings and an additional stack. This larger operation would be contained within the same facility footprint and the additional structures would remain Page 82 Page 79 of 138 adjacent to the existing structures. Overall, the visual differences between the 400,000 tonnes per year facility compared to the existing 140,000 tonnes per year facility would be minimal. In response to a request from the Municipality of Clarington at the time of the study, potential visual effects associated with the DYEC were also assessed with regards to the planned future build-out of the Clarington Energy Business Park. These future facilities and infrastructure include the proposed Ontario Power Generation Building and Visitors Centre (identified to be situated on 61 acres of currently vacant land, northeast of the DYEC), Energy Drive (an east-west thoroughfare traversing the Clarington Energy Business Park), and the then proposed Highway 407 East extension interchange ramps to connect with Highway 401. The cumulative effects of a 400,000 tonne per year facility, in addition to other planned and future building and construction projects surrounding the DYEC, would result in a decrease in visual impacts as the character of the area changes. Negative visual effects are minimal based on the DYEC location in the Clarington Energy Business Park between the Courtice Water Pollution Control Plant to the south and commercial properties to the north. The completion of the Darlington Energy Complex and construction of the 407 East interchange ramps will further reduce the overall visual impact of the DYEC. With no new construction, the capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year will not alter the site visually from existing conditions, therefore no further visual assessments are required. The Host Community Agreement included investment by the Region of Durham in infrastructure including roadways to support the Clarington Energy Business Park and surrounding area to serve existing and future businesses and residents. Based on the review of the initial EA and recent announcements of investment in the Clarington Energy Business Park, no significant negative visual effects will result from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. Page 83 Page 80 of 138 3.12 Heritage and Culture Review of the following 2009 studies that were undertaken during the initial Environmental Assessment show there are no effects to Heritage and Culture as outlined in the screening criteria checklist: Stage 2 Archeological Assessment and Built Heritage - Technical Study Report (Jacques Whitford, 2009, Appendix C-9) The Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment and Built Heritage Technical Study Report was prepared to assess the potential archaeological and heritage resource related impacts associated with the development of the DYEC, potential mitigation required and net effects. The assumed 400,000 tonnes per year building footprint was used to carry out the investigation. Since the capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year does not require any construction, the 400,000 tonnes per year building footprint evaluation continues to address all potential concerns associated with a capacity increase. A Stage 2, below-grade survey was completed based on the determination that there was an elevated potential for the presence of archaeological resources. A Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment was completed for the construction of the Courtice Water Pollution Control Plant located south of the DYEC. The Stage 1 assessment indicated no historic period archaeological resources in or near the site of the DYEC. The walking survey completed during the Stage 2 assessment revealed only a few small, non- diagnostic and modern artifacts as well no pre-historic artifacts or significant features were noted. Shovel test pits were completed in less accessible areas of the DYEC facility location. These investigations also indicated no artifacts, anthropogenically altered soils or other items of archaeological significance. The Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment Technical Study Report concluded that there were no archaeological artifacts or significant sites at the DYEC. Although the location and physical characteristics of the site should have made it an attractive settlement location for Late Woodland horticulturalists, there would have been hundreds or Page 84 Page 81 of 138 thousands of artifacts readily identifiable at the site during the survey if it had been the site of a native village. The Ministry of Culture issued a letter dated February 3, 2012, included in Appendix F, accepting the Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment - Technical Study Report dated May 25, 2009 and two addendums to the report that detail additional shovel testing completed after the original study. The technical study is listed in the Provincial register of archaeological reports and no archaeological sites were documented. The Ministry of Culture agreed with the recommendation of no further concerns for alterations to archaeological sites for the study area. The DYEC capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year does not require any new construction or changes to the existing building footprint. The capacity increase will not disturb any soils or expand the site beyond the previously assessed boundaries. No additional archaeological assessment is required. Based on the review of the initial EA, Ministry of Culture and Tourism correspondence, and no required construction and no new built cultural heritage resources in the area, no significant negative effects to heritage or culture will result from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. 3.13 Indigenous Communities Consultation and engagement with Indigenous communities will continue to determine if any concerns related to the increase in capacity at the DYEC exist as part of our Duty to Consult with First Nations and Métis communities where decisions or actions that may adversely impact asserted or established Aboriginal or treaty rights. A summary of the consultation efforts is included as part of the Record of Consultation in Appendix H Review of the following 2009 studies that were undertaken for the initial Environmental Assessment for any assumptions, estimates and updates are provided with known/current information where applicable: Page 85 Page 82 of 138 Review of the Record of Consultation to determine the concerns of Indigenous Communities during the initial EA. This review indicated several common themes of concern relating largely to the protection of the natural environment, and the emissions from the facility. The review of the studies completed above, and the air emissions study undertaken as part of the study as listed below review the potential impacts to the environments of concern which include: o Groundwater and Surface Water Technical Study Report o Archaeological Assessment and Built Heritage Technical Study Report o Natural Environment Technical Study Report Air Quality Impact Assessment by Golder Associates.As described above, a review of groundwater and surface water, and the natural environment shows no additional negative environmental effects are likely to occur as a result of the waste capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year and effective mitigation and monitoring plans are in place. Current mitigation measures in place for the 140,000 tonnes per year facility are sufficient to manage an additional 20,000 tonnes of capacity with no additional impacts to the natural environment or groundwater and surface water. The updated air modelling by Golder Associates simulating a 160,000 tonne per year facility indicated that the predicted concentrations of all Indicator Compounds showing a decrease for the 160,000 tonne per year operating scenario compared to the 140,000 tonnes per year operating scenario. Based on the results of two separate Stage 2 archaeological assessments conducted in 2009 during the original development of the facility, the likelihood of significant, intact archaeological resources on the site is low. No archaeological evidence or items of historical significance were found on the site during construction. The Archaeological Assessment Technical Study Report was provided to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport and no archaeological sites were documented. Given construction is not required as part of this capacity increase, further archaeological assessments are not planned as part of the project. Page 86 Page 83 of 138 With no construction required for the capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year and a review of previous and current emissions assessments showing no significant impacts to land and resources, there are no impacts to Indigenous communities. The Regions will continue to consult on any project updates with potentially impacted communities. Based on the review of the initial EA, the historical consultation with Indigenous communities prior to DYEC construction and no new construction associated with the capacity increase, no significant negative effects result from the 20,000 tonnes per year capacity increase. 3.14 Other Increasing the waste capacity of the DYEC to 160,000 tonnes per year will result in additional ash generation. As illustrated in the table below, an additional 20,000 tonnes of waste per year is estimated to result in an additional 14 per cent ash generation. This ash will continue to be shipped to a landfill for use as daily cover. It is expected that an additional one (1) truck trip per day will be necessary to dispose of the additional ash. Table 5 Anticipated Increase in Ash Generation Waste Processed 140,000 tonnes 160,000 tonnes Increase in Ash Generation (tonnes) Ash % Increase Fly Ash Generated (tonnes) 14,004 16,005 2,001 13.3% Bottom Ash Generated (tonnes) 27,134 31,010 3,876 1.3% Page 87 Page 84 of 138 The DYEC conducts an Ash Sampling and Testing Protocol that is approved by the MECP under ECA condition 7(7)(d). The sampling protocol objectives are to ensure the bottom ash contains less than 10 per cent by weight combustible material and that conditioned fly ash is not leachate toxic. Page 88 Page 85 of 138 4. Environmental Effects Assessment and Impact Management Plan 4.1 Environmental Effects Assessment As described in Section 3, the Environmental Screening Checklist was completed to identify potential negative effects from the DYEC capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year. Additional studies were undertaken where necessary for areas identified with a potential negative environmental effect. 4.2 Impact Management and Monitoring The DYEC currently conducts air emissions monitoring to ensure the operations do not result in a negative environmental effect. The CEMS monitors operational and regulatory parameters on a continuous real-time basis to provide initial indication of facility performance. CEMS monitoring provides immediate detection of facility conditions which enable the operator to implement immediate measures to mitigate any potential negative impacts to air quality. Source testing is conducted annually over a period of three to five days and provides the current stack emissions data for a full suite of parameters (dioxins and furans, particulate, metals, acid gases and volatile organic carbons). Ambient air monitoring provides an indication of air quality in the vicinity of the facility. Although the ambient air data is not used to identify a single emissions source, it can be used as a tool to determine changes to air quality near the DYEC. All three air monitoring methods: CEMS, stack tests and ambient air monitoring, are used to monitor air quality near the DYEC so potential impacts can be mitigated or managed quickly and effectively. Results of these testing and monitoring programs are provided to the MECP and posted on the DYEC website for public information. 4.2.1 CEMS The DYEC uses CEMS to monitor operational and compliance parameters. CEMS continuously analyzes and measures air emissions and provides a permanent record of current emission levels. The results of continuously monitored parameters can be seen Page 89 Page 86 of 138 on the DYEC website (Emissions Data) and are updated on a 1-minute, 10-minute and hourly basis. Table 6 shows the average readings for CEMS parameters in 2020 compared to the ECA-Schedule C limits. The DYEC annual average CEMS results from 2020 demonstrate the facility operates within compliance of the ECA limits. Table 6: 2020 Average CEMS readings The CEMS performance in 2020 was excellent with the average monthly CEMS availability for all parameters ranging from 95 to 100 per cent. The 2020 annual Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) on the CEMS was performed in July of 2020. The CEMS met the performance parameters detailed in Schedule F of the ECA. Therefore, the data recorded by the DYEC CEMS was used to assess against the in-stack emissions limits detailed in Schedule C of the ECA for hydrochloric acid, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide. 4.2.2 Air Pollution Control The DYEC uses air pollution control technology which assists to assist with meeting stringent air emissions regulatory limits. All air pollution control processes are integrated with the facility Distributed Control System (DCS). The DCS includes alarms to inform control room operators if a system is not achieving a specific setpoint. The following air pollution control systems are utilized to ensure compliance with emissions limits: Parameter (units) ECA Limit Boiler #1 Boiler #2 Opacity (%) 5 0 0 Opacity (%) 10 0 0 Hydrochloric Acid (mg/Rm3) 9 4 5 Sulphur Dioxide (mg/Rm3) 35 1 1 Nitrogen Oxides (mg/Rm3) 121 110 111 Carbon Monoxide (mg/Rm3) 40 10 11 Oxygen (%) Minimum 6 8 8 Furnace Temperature (ºC) Minimum 1000 1218 1302 Baghouse Inlet Temperature (ºC) >120 <185 142 143 Page 90 Page 87 of 138 The NOx reduction process consists of two systems that are integrated through the DCS: The Very Low NOx (VLN TM) system Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) system Combustion processes including carbon monoxide are monitored using the Martin Infrared Combustion Control (MICC) System Dioxin and Furan mitigation is accomplished using: Furnace temperature is maintained at a minimum 1000º C, 1 second residence for dioxin and furan mitigation Activated powdered carbon injection Mercury is mitigated through the use of powder activated carbon. Acid gases, including hydrogen chloride hydrogen fluoride, and sulphur dioxide, are mitigated using dry hydrated lime injection with fly ash recirculation A fabric filter bag house comprised of over 3000 individual bags (1,560 bags per baghouse/boiler) is used for particulate matter and heavy metals (lead and cadmium) control 4.3 Air Emissions The ECA for the DYEC establishes air requirements for the site. Emission limits in the ECA are established for the stack that are based on Guideline A-7 and Ontario Regulation 419/05 Air Pollution - Local Air Quality. Under the ECA there are specific stack emission limits that are not to be exceeded. Stack emissions and ambient air emissions are monitored with the monitoring results provided to the MECP and posted to the DYEC website. Stack emissions are monitored by Continuous Emissions Monitoring and annual stack tests. Key combustion parameters are monitored continuously when the boilers are in operation and the emission levels are available to the public in real time on the DYEC website and on an external display board on the building. The CEMS system is Page 91 Page 88 of 138 equipped with alarms to notify the operators when there is a potential deviation above a performance requirement in the ECA. The ECA also requires the boilers to be shut down if the performance requirements are exceeded for a continuous three-hour period. The ECA requires an annual source test on the DYEC. Prior to completing the source test, the MECP must review and accept the testing plan and has the option to attend the source test to observe the sample collection and operating conditions. Results of the annual source test are provided to the MECP for review and are posted on the DYEC website. The ECA also required the Regions to establish an ambient air monitoring program to assess ambient air both upwind and downwind of the DYEC. Ambient air measurements are compared to Ontario Ambient Air Quality Criteria (AAQC) or Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). Readings represent impacts of multiple sources in an area. 4.3.1 Stack Emissions Table 7 shows the results of the spring and fall 2020 source test results compared to the in-stack contaminant concentration limits set in DYEC’s ECA, as well as those outlined in Ontario’s A-7 Guideline and the European Union (EU). The Regions proposed the prescribed ECA limits and included them as part of the DYEC Request for Proposal to demonstrate commitment to meet or exceed current regulatory standards. The MECP adopted those limits and included them in the ECA. The DYEC ECA limits either met or exceeded the legislative emission limits in Ontario. An additional level of safety is built in with the more stringent ECA limits. As illustrated in Table 7, the results of the 2020 source tests demonstrate that the DYEC normally operates well below the stringent ECA and A-7 limits. Page 92 Page 89 of 138 Table 7: Comparative In-Stack Contaminant Concentration Limits Table Parameter (units) European Union (EU) Limits Ontario A-7 Guideline ECA Limits Boiler #1 Source Test Results Boiler #2 Source Test Results Spring 2020 Fall 2020 Spring 2020 Fall 2020 Particulate Matter (mg/Rm3) 9 14 9 1.14 2.6 1.04 2.0 Cadmium (µg/Rm3) N/A 7 7 0.056 0.075 0.11 0.056 Lead (µg/Rm3) N/A 60 50 0.55 0.37 0.61 0.34 Mercury (µg/Rm3) 46 20 15 0.13 0.34 0.10 0.045 Dioxins and Furans (pg/Rm3) 92 80 60 1.82 28.7 2.53 7.26 Hydrochloric Acid (mg/Rm3) 9 27 9 – (24 hr avg.) 4.5 3.8 5.10 3.20 Sulphur Dioxide (mg/Rm3) 46 56 35– (24 hr avg.) 0 0.1 0 0.1 Nitrogen Oxides (mg/Rm3) 183 198 121– (24 hr avg.) 109 110 109 110 Organic matter - methane (ppmdv) N/A 50 50 0.2 0.5 1.7 1.1 Carbon Monoxide (mg/Rm3) N/A 40 40 – (4 hr avg.) 15.2 11.4 11.4 14.1 Page 93 Page 90 of 138 In 2019, Golder Associates Limited (Golder) simulated the potential change in local air quality levels from the DYEC increasing its annual waste capacity by 20,000 tonnes per year to a maximum of 160,000 tonnes per year. The results of the Golder preliminary assessment were compared to the assessment for 140,000 tonnes per year completed in 2011, in support of the DYEC ECA application. The Technical Memorandum prepared by Golder, “Air Quality Impact of 160,000 tonnes per year Waste at Durham York Energy Centre”, is attached as Appendix C. As a result of consultation with the MECP during the development of the screening report, an updated ESDM report be prepared for the facility using updated background and meteorological data in support of the ECA Application. Air quality emission calculations and modelling have to be completed and documented in accordance with MECP procedures (Guideline A-10: Procedure for Preparing an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) Report | Ontario.ca) to assess compliance with Ontario Regulation 419/05 air quality limits. Additionally, an AQIA was undertaken by Golder (2021) and the results determined the waste capacity increase of 20,000 tonnes per year is not expected to significantly impact local air quality. Emission rates for the 160,000 tonnes per year scenario were calculated using the same emission factors as the 140,000 tonnes per year scenario but the flow rate was adjusted according to recent source testing data. Modelling of the emissions for the 160,000 tonnes per year was carried out using the same model (CALPUFF), meteorological data set (2003-2007) and modelling methodology used in previous reports. This modelling approach was conservative and allowed for a level of safety to be built in by assuming the worst-case maximum operating and meteorological conditions. The DYEC operates below the permitted limits for all parameters which adds another layer of protection and conservatism. Page 94 Page 91 of 138 The AQIA predicted that the increase in capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year will comply with regulatory air quality standards. Modelling also demonstrates that the capacity increase is not likely to have a significant impact on ambient air quality near the DYEC, as the majority of concentrations decreased as a result of improved dispersion. An ESDM report has been prepared and will be submitted to the MECP in support of the ECA Application. The predicted concentrations of each scenario were compared to the relevant provincial or federal ambient air quality criteria (AAQC) where available. For contaminants that do not have an AAQC, the corresponding air quality standard listed in Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) and 419/05 (MECP limit) was used. In each scenario, predicted Point of Impingement (POI) concentrations of all contaminant were significantly lower than the corresponding air quality criteria. For the 140,000 tonnes per year scenario, the contaminants with the highest predicted concentration relative to O.Reg. 419/05 standards was Nitrogen dioxide at 24 per cent of the relevant AAQC (112.8 µg/m3) over a 1 hour averaging period. Comparatively, for the 160,000 tonnes per year scenario, Nitrogen dioxide is also the highest predicted concentration relative to the AAQC but at 25 per cent of the relevant MECP limit (112.8 µg/m3) over a 1 hour averaging period. Background air quality concentration were added to the predicted concentrations from the facility to estimate cumulative concentrations. The cumulative concentrations of all contaminants were compared to the Project Criteria and are still below the relevant air quality limits for both modelled scenarios, with the exception of Benzo(a)pyrene over an annual averaging period and Nitrogen dioxide during emergency generator testing. The background concentration of Benzo(a)pyrene is greater than the MECP limit before any contribution from DYEC is included and emissions from DYEC contribute less than 1 per cent to the total ambient Benzo(a)pyrene concentration. Overall, the air quality modelling results for the two scenarios result in predicted concentrations that vary by less than 9 per cent, with some contaminants showing a decrease in predicted concentration and some contaminants showing a slight increase Page 95 Page 92 of 138 in concentration, depending on the average period. This result is caused by the combination of higher emission rates with increased flow rate and temperature, which would result in improved dispersion characteristics for some meteorological conditions and reduced concentrations of some contaminants. Once background concentrations are added to the predicted concentrations, the respective change in concentrations decreases to less than 5 per cent for all contaminants. In summary, the results of the 160,000 tonnes per year scenario demonstrate that the DYEC is in compliance with relevant air quality criteria and the waste capacity increase of 20,000 tonnes per year results in minor changes to the theoretical maximums with the concentrations of only 4 of the 87 contaminants assessed increasing as compared to the 140,000 tonnes per year scenario, depending on the time averaging period. 4.3.2 Greenhouse Gas Section 3 determined that the actual GHG emissions from the DYEC at 140,000 tonnes per year was comparable with what was predicted in the 2009 EA studies in terms of the effect on the Canadian and Ontario GHG emission totals. There were no significant changes to the annual Canadian and Ontario GHG totals when waste capacity was projected to 160,000 tonnes per year using the DYEC 2019 actual totals. Using the model and assumptions from the initial EA “Supplement to Annex E-5: Comparative Analysis of Thermal Treatment and Remote Landfill on a Lifecycle Basis” (LCA) the emissions from processing an additional 20,000 tonnes per year were estimated and compared between the remote landfill and energy from waste disposal options. As detailed in the table below, the DYEC results in a net improvement of air emissions compared to landfill on a life-cycle basis. It shows lower emissions data compared to the actual 2019 operational data since the 2007 calculation is a net calculation accounting for displacement and energy offset credits. In addition, the 2019 operational data includes biogenic carbon calculations of the incoming waste stream which accurately depicts the actual anthropogenic carbon being emitted vs fixable Page 96 Page 93 of 138 carbon which is put back into the atmosphere. This also results in lower emissions of acid gases and smog precursors. Table 8: Emissions to Air for the Management of 20,000 tonnes per year of Residual Waste by Remote Landfill and Energy from Waste (DYEC) 20,000 tonnes per year of Residual Waste Landfill EFW by DYEC Variance Energy Consumption (GJ/yr) (GJ/tonne) (GJ/yr) (GJ/tonne) 4640 19 -230480 -922 -225840(GJyr)/-903(GJt) Emissions to Air GHG's (tonnes/yr) (kg/tonne) (tonnes/yr) (kg/tonne) CO2e 4720 19 2640 11 2080(tyr)/8(kgt) Acid gases (tonnes/yr) (kg/tonne) (tonnes/yr) (kg/tonne) NOx 4 0.02 2.4 0.001 1.6(tyr)/0.019(kgt) SOx -2.3 -0.01 -47.6 -0.2 HCl 0.16 0.0008 0.96 0.004 2080(tyr)/0.8(kgt) Smog precursors (tonnes/yr) (kg/tonne) (tonnes/yr) (kg/tonne) NOx 4 0.02 2.4 0.001 1.6(tyr)/0.019(kgt) PM 0.72 0.003 -5.5 -0.02 -6.22(tyr)/-0.023(kgt) VOCs 0.72 0 -5 -0.02 -5.72(tyr)/-0.02(kgt) Heavy Metals (kg/yr) (g/tonne) (kg/yr) (g/tonne) Pb 0 0 0.7 0.002 0.7(kgyr)/0.002(gt) Hg 0 0 0.7 0.002 0.7(kgyr)/0.002(gt) Cd 0 0 0.06 0 0.06(kgyr)/0(gt) Dioxins g/yr (µg/tonne) g/yr (µg/tonne) 0.000002 0.000008 0.001 0.004 0.000998(gyr)/0.003992(µg) Page 97 Page 94 of 138 Base Case – Remote Landfill System 2a – Thermal Treatment of Mixed Solid Waste & Recovery of Energy followed by Recovery of Materials from Ash/Char ENERGY CONSUMPTION (GJ/year) (GJ/tonne) (GJ/year) (GJ/tonne) Energy Consumption 58,000 232 -2,881,000 -11,524 EMISSIONS TO AIR Greenhouse Gases (tonnes/year) (kg/tonne) (tonnes/year) (kg/tonne) Net carbon dioxide equivalent, eCO2 59,000 236 33,000 132 2019 DYEC Operational Data- 140,000 TPY Processing Capability CO2 Emissions CH4 Emissi ons N2O Emissions CO2 Equivalent Emissions Non-Biomass Biomass tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes Total Emissions 67,555.65 88,475.22 54.19 7.24 159,545.40 The table below shows the increase in energy and GHG Emissions if there is an increase of 20,000 tonnes per year processing capacity. In this scenario, modelled GHG emissions were calculated comparing the impact on emissions to the DYEC and landfill respectively. This scenario still indicates a lower GHG emissions rating compared to that of traditional landfill situations. In addition, it is interesting to note that energy consumption for the EFW by DYEC shows negative values due to the fact that this facility is a net energy producer and thus does not require energy draw from the grid. Page 98 Page 95 of 138 20,000 Landfill EFW by DYEC Variance Energy Consump tion (GJ/yr) (GJ/tonne ) (GJ/yr) (GJ/tonne ) 4640 19 - 230480 -922 -225840(GJyr)/-903(GJt) Emissions to Air GHG’s (tonnes/ yr) (kg/tonne) (tonnes /yr) (kg/tonne) CO2e 4720 19 2640 11 2080(tyr)/8(kg) 4.3.3 Noise In November 2019, Golder completed an additional acoustic assessment of the DYEC to determine the impact of processing an additional 20,000 tonnes per year and to support the ECA amendment application. All relevant sound levels for sources were obtained from Golder’s onsite sound measurements using an NTI sound level meter/real-time analyzer, which were used as inputs to a predictive acoustical model to quantify outdoor noise emissions associated with the Facility. The acoustic assessment report documents the operations at the DYEC and has been prepared in accordance with MECP noise guidelines, NPC 233 “Information to be Submitted for Approval of Stationary Sources of Sound” (NPC 233) and NPC 300 “Environmental Noise Guideline, Stationary and Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning” (NPC 30). Page 99 Page 96 of 138 Significant noise sources associated with the Facility operations include HVAC units, roof ventilation units, closed-loop cooling water cooler, transformer, silo filing using truck mounted blower, silo vent dust collector, main exhaust stack, on-site truck traffic, front end loader traffic, air cooled condensers, various building openings (louvers, bay doors etc.), an emergency diesel generator and two emergency diesel fire pumps. Testing of the Facility’s emergency diesel generator and emergency fire pumps is limited to daytime hours only (i.e., 07:00 to 19:00 hours) Three (3) locations have been identified as being representative of the most sensitive Point(s) of Reception (POR(s)) in the vicinity of the Facility. Golder predicted sound levels from the Facility at the identified PORs are below the applicable sound level limits during the predictable worst-case hour of the Facility during normal operation and during the periodic testing of the emergency diesel generator and emergency diesel fire pumps. Therefore, the Facility can operate in compliance with MECP noise guideline as specified in NPC 300 Site operations were not expected to be a significant source of vibration as defined by the MECP in NPC 207, and therefore a vibration assessment was not carried out. The predictive analysis was carried out using Cadna/A V 2019 MR 1 Geometrical spreading, attenuation from barriers, ground effect and air absorption were included in the analysis as determined from ISO 9613 (part 2), which is the current MECP accepted standard used for outdoor sound propagation predictions. DYEC operations, as described in Section 3.0 of the report, were modelled to determine the predictive worst-case sound levels at the identified PORs. Sound levels were predicted at each POR location for both Plane of Window (POW) and Outdoor POR’s. Outdoor POR sound levels (at a height of 1.5 m) were predicted by calculating sound levels using a 2 m by 2 m grid resolution within the POR property boundaries and within Page 100 Page 97 of 138 30 m of the POW POR as per NPC 300. Sample calculation are provided in Appendix G of this report Based on the result of the assessment, the noise emissions associated with Facility operations are below the applicable sound level limits at the identified PORs. With only four additional trucks per day and no additional equipment required to be operated to manage a waste capacity increase of 20,000 tonnes per year, noise impacts from DYEC operations are negligible. Therefore, the Facility is expected to operate in compliance with MECP noise guidelines as specified in NPC 300. The Acoustic Assessment Report is attached as Appendix D 4.3.4 Proximity to Aerodome/Airport Bowmanville Hospital is located at 47 Liberty Street South in Bowmanville and maintains a helipad for air ambulance service. Although air ambulance service is currently suspended to the hospital, it is anticipated to resume with a re-located helipad in the near future. The DYEC received aeronautical clearance from Navigation Canada as constructed. Since there is no new construction, building or stack alterations required for the increase in capacity to 160,000 tonnes per year, there is no negative impact due to the proximity of the helipad at Bowmanville Hospital. Therefore, nautical clearance remains valid and does not require updating. 4.3.5 Ambient Air As part of the DYEC’s environmental monitoring programs, two ambient air monitoring stations were established in 2013 to monitor ambient air quality in the vicinity of the DYEC in accordance with an Ambient Air Monitoring and Reporting Plan approved by the MECP. The two stations were sited with input from the MECP and are located at predominately upwind (Courtice) and downwind (Rundle Road) locations to the DYEC. The MECP ambient air station location approval can be found on the DYEC website at MECP Approval of Ambient Air Station Monitoring Locations. The Figure below shows the location of the two monitoring station locations relevant to DYEC. Page 101 Page 98 of 138 A summary table of the ambient air monitoring program is listed in Table 9 below: Table 9: Ambient Air Monitoring Program Summary Monitoring Stations/ Frequency Courtice Road (upwind) Rundle Road (downwind) Continuously NOx, SO2, PM2.5 NOx, SO2, PM2.5 Non-continuous (every 6 days) metals metals Non-continuous (every 12 days) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Page 102 Page 99 of 138 Non-continuous (every 24 days) Dioxins and furans Dioxins and furans As required by the approved Ambient Air Monitoring and Reporting Plan, quarterly and annual reports are produced for the MECP, in accordance with the MECP Operation Manual for Air Quality Monitoring in Ontario (2018) and posted to the DYEC website: DYEC Ambient Air Monitoring Reports . The monitored contaminant concentrations are compared to air quality criteria and standards set by the MECP and by Environment Canada. The MECP developed Ambient Air Quality Criteria (AAQCs) which are the maximum desirable concentrations in the outdoor air, based on effects to the environment and health (MECP, 2012). Not all contaminants have an applicable regulatory limit; therefore, other criteria were used for comparison. These included Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) criteria. New AAQC’s for SO2 were implemented in 2020, including a 10-minute rolling average AAQC of 67 ppb, a 1-hour rolling average AAQC of 40ppb and an annual AAQC of 4 ppb. There is no longer a 24-hour rolling average AAQC for SO2. In May of 2013 the federal government published the Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) as non-binding objectives under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. The CAAQS were developed under the direction of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) as outdoor air quality targets that “set the bar” for air quality actions across Canada. In 2020, new CAAQS’ were implemented which are listed in Table 10. Page 103 Page 100 of 138 Table 10: PM2.5, SO2 and NO2 CAAQS’ by Implementation Year The Courtice and Rundle Road Monitoring Stations observed no exceedances of Total Suspended Particulate (TSP), metals, Dioxins and Furans, PM2.5 or NO2 over their applicable AAQC, HHRA or CAAQS during 2020. The 2020 Ambient Air Annual Report presents a summary of the continuous sampling statistics at each station for 2020 compared to Ontario AAQC, Ontario Regulation 419/05 and HHRA values as provided in Table 11. Page 104 Page 101 of 138 Table 11: 2020 Summary of Statistics for Continuous Sampling Parameter Levels at Courtice and Rundle Road Stations Compared to AAQC/HHRA’s Table 12 below, from the 2020 Ambient Air Annual Report presents a summary of the continuous sampling statistics at each ambient air monitoring station for 2020 compared to applicable CAAQS’. Page 105 Page 102 of 138 Table 12: 2018-2020 Summary of Statistics for Continuous Sampling Parameter Levels at Courtice and Rundle Road Stations Compared to CAAQS’ The Courtice Monitoring Station observed nineteen (19) exceedances over the maximum hourly mean AAQC for SO2 (40 ppb) during 2020. There were also twenty-four (24) exceedances of the rolling 10-minute average AAQC (67 ppb) at the Courtice Station in 2020. The elevated SO2 events at the Courtice Monitoring Station occurred from when the wind is from the East to South directions. The events were possibly a result of emissions from industrial sources along the lakeshore. It is unlikely that any significant contribution of measured SO2 came from the DYEC. Additionally, based on the in-stack concentration levels measured by the CEMS during the time of the exceedance events, there were no unusual levels in SO2 emissions recorded. Page 106 Page 103 of 138 The Rundle Monitoring Station observed five (5) exceedances over the maximum hourly mean AAQC for SO2 (40 ppb) during 2020. There were also nine (9) exceedances of the rolling 10-minute average AAQC (67 ppb) at the Rundle Station in 2020. The elevated SO2 events at the Rundle Road Monitoring Station occurred when the wind was travelling from East to South directions. The events were possibly a result of emissions from industrial sources along the lake shore. It is unlikely that any significant contribution of measured SO2 came from the DYEC. Additionally, based on the in-stack concentration levels measured by the CEMS during the time of the exceedance events, there were no unusual levels in SO2 emissions recorded. At the beginning of 2020, the 1-hour AAQC limit was reduced from 250 to 40 ppb. In previous years, the Courtice and Rundle Road Monitoring Stations recorded no SO2 exceedances. A summary of the 2020 TSP/metals discrete sampling statistics at Courtice and Rundle Road Stations are presented in Table 13. All results were compared to the applicable twenty-four (24) hour criteria/standards/HHRA. Page 107 Page 104 of 138 Table 13: 2020 Summary of Statistics for Discrete Sampling of TSP and Metal Parameter Levels at Courtice and Rundle Road Stations Page 108 Page 105 of 138 A summary of the 2020 PAH discrete sampling statistics at Courtice and Rundle Road Stations is presented in Table 14. All results were compared to the applicable twenty-four (24) hour criteria/standards/HHRA. Page 109 Page 106 of 138 Table 14 2020 Summary of Statistics for Discrete Sampling of PAH Parameter Levels at Courtice and Rundle Road Stations Page 110 Page 107 of 138 The Courtice Monitoring Station observed four (4) exceedances over the daily AAQC for Benzo(a)pyrene (0.05 ng/m3) during 2020. The Rundle Road Monitoring Station observed five (5) exceedances over the daily AAQC for Benzo(a)pyrene (0.05 ng/m3) during 2020. Table 15 presents a summary of the 2020 Dioxin and Furan discrete sampling statistics at Courtice and Rundle Road Stations. All results were compared to the applicable twenty-four (24) hour criteria/standards. Page 111 Page 108 of 138 Table15: 2020 Summary of Statistics for Discrete Sampling of Dioxin and Furan Parameter Levels at Courtice and Rundle Road Stations Page 112 Page 109 of 138 A summary of the Criteria Air Contaminant (CAC) concentration statistics for Courtice and Rundle Road Stations from 2013-2020 are presented in Tables 16-18 comparing the annual Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) and Particulate Matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5) data. All continuously monitored NO2 levels were below the applicable hourly, 24-hour and annual average criteria from 2013 to 2020 for both the Courtice and Rundle Road Monitoring Stations. It should be noted that NOx and NO do not have any applicable AAQC’s/CAAQS’. As of 2020, there are two new CAAQS’ for NO2 which define limits on the annual average concentration and on the 3-year average of the annual 98th percentile of the daily maximum 1-hour mean concentrations. A summary of annual NOx, NO and NO2 data for both stations is presented in Table 16 for 2013-2020. The 2020 Ambient Air Annual Report (RWDI, 2020) noted the following observations: • The maximum measured hourly average NO2 concentrations at the two stations have generally shown the Courtice Station having higher maximums than Rundle Road apart from 2014 and 2019; 2017 showed similar levels. • The maximum measured 24-hour average NO2 concentrations at the two stations have remained relatively constant and have generally shown similar levels between both stations year to year. • Measured annual average NO2 concentrations at the Courtice Station have been slightly higher than the Rundle Road Station apart from 2013 and 2015 where they showed similar levels. Measured annual average NO2 concentrations at both stations were relatively constant for all the years presented. • Measured maximum 1-hour and 24-hour average NO2 concentrations have not come close to exceeding the applicable AAQC over the 2013-2020 period. In 2020, there were more frequent SO2 concentrations elevated above the AAQC’s than in previous years due to the new limits imposed at the start of 2020. A summary of Page 113 Page 110 of 138 annual SO2 data for both stations is presented in Table 17 for 2013-2020. The 2020 Ambient Air Annual Report (RWDI, 2020) noted the following observations: • In previous years the measured maximum 1-hour, 24-hour average and annual average SO2 concentrations did not come close to exceeding their applicable AAQC. • In 2020, the maximum 1-hour mean AAQC was changed from 250 to 40 ppb (an 84 per cent reduction). There were nineteen (19) exceedances of the new criteria at the Courtice station and five (5) exceedances at the Rundle station. • There were also twenty-four (24) and nine (9) exceedances of the rolling 10- minute average AAQC (67 ppb) at the Courtice and Rundle stations respectively. • The maximum measured hourly average SO2 concentrations at the two stations have generally shown the Courtice Station consistently having higher maximums than Rundle Road and both stations trending the same over the entire timeseries. • The maximum measured 24-hour average SO2 concentrations at the two stations have generally shown the Courtice Station consistently having higher maximums than Rundle Road with the exception of 2015 where maximums were generally the same. Measured 24-hour average SO2 concentrations at both stations were relatively constant for all the years presented. • Measured annual average SO2 concentrations at the Courtice Station have been slightly higher than the Rundle Road Station apart from 2015 where they showed similar levels. Measured annual average SO2 concentrations at both stations were relatively constant for all the years presented. All continuously monitored PM2.5 levels were below the applicable CAAQS’ from 2013 to 2020 for both the Courtice and Rundle Road Monitoring Stations. A summary of annual PM2.5 data for both stations is presented in Table 18 for 2013-2020. The 2020 Ambient Air Annual Report (RWDI, 2020) noted the following observations: Page 114 Page 111 of 138 • The 3-year averaged annual PM2.5 concentrations measured at the two stations have generally shown a declining trend in overall averages and the Rundle Road Station has had a slightly higher average as compared to the Courtice Station, with the exception of 2017-2019 where both stations were similar and 2018-2020 where Courtice is slightly higher. • The 3-Year averages of annual 98th percentile 24-Hour PM2.5 mean concentrations measured at the two stations have generally shown a declining trend in overall averages and the Rundle Road Station has had a slightly higher average as compared to the Courtice Station, with the exception of 2017-2019 where both stations were similar and 2018-2020 where Courtice is slightly higher. Page 115 Page 112 of 138 Table 3: 2013-2020 Comparison of Measured NOX, NO and NO2 Statistics for Courtice and Rundle Road Monitoring Stations Page 116 Page 113 of 138 Table 17: 2013-2020 Comparison of Measured SO2 Statistics for Courtice and Rundle Road Monitoring Stations Page 117 Page 114 of 138 Table 18: 2013-2020 Comparison of Measured PM2.5 Statistics for Courtice and Rundle Road Monitoring Stations Page 118 Page 115 of 138 A summary of the maximum measured daily average Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) and Metal concentrations and percentage of the applicable AAQC’/HHRC’ from 2013-2014, and 2016-2020 at the Courtice and Rundle Road Monitoring Stations is presented in Tables 19 and 20, respectively. The 2013, 2014 and 2016 data should be reviewed with caution “since the measurement period in 2013 was eight months (April- December), six months (January-June) in 2014, and 11 months (February-December) in 2016, due to the non-continuous monitoring being temporarily discontinued as per the ambient monitoring plan (Stantec, 2018). There were two (2) TSP exceedances in 2017, four (4) exceedances in 2018, and one (1) exceedance in 2019. No other exceedances of TSP or Metals have occurred at the Courtice or Rundle Road Monitoring Stations from 2013 to 2020. An investigation into DYEC performance was undertaken upon each TSP exceedance. Page 119 Page 116 of 138 Table 19: 2013-2020 Comparison of Measured TSP and Metals Concentrations at the Courtice Station Page 120 Page 117 of 138 Table 20: 2013-2020 Comparison of Measured TSP and Metals Concentrations at the Rundle Road Station Page 121 Page 118 of 138 A summary of the maximum measured daily average Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) concentrations and percentage of the applicable AAQC from 2013-2014, and 2016-2020 for both Courtice and Rundle Road Monitoring Stations is presented in Table 21 and 22 respectively. The 2013, 2014 and 2016 data should be reviewed with caution “since the measurement periods are not the same in each year, the data are not directly comparable” (Stantec, 2018). The maximum measured PAH concentrations, with the exception of Benzo(a)Pyrene, were all well below applicable AAQC from 2013-2020. Page 122 Page 119 of 138 Table 21: 2013-2020 Comparison of Measured PAH Concentrations at the Courtice Station Page 123 Page 120 of 138 Table 22: 2013-2020 Comparison of Measured PAH Concentrations at the Rundle Road Station Page 124 Page 121 of 138 The maximum measured ambient toxic equivalent Dioxins and Furans (D&F) concentrations from 2013 – 2020 and their specific measurement period for both Courtice and Rundle Road Monitoring Stations is presented in Table 23. The 2013-2016 data should be reviewed with caution “as the measurement periods were different and cover different periods of each year (with different meteorological conditions). Only the 2017 measurements encompassed a full year as previous years sampling were dependent on the start-up date of the DYEC” (Stantec, 2018). There was one (1) exceedance of the maximum measured toxic equivalent D&F concentration AAQC at the Courtice Monitoring Station in 2018, but none in 2013-2017 or 2019-2020. The maximum measured toxic equivalent D&F concentrations at the Rundle Road Station were all below the applicable AAQC from 2013-2020. An investigation into DYEC performance was undertaken upon the exceedance. The exceedance was determined not to be a result of DYEC facility operations. During the monitoring period the predominant winds were blowing from the southwest and west which places the Courtice station upwind of the Durham York Energy Centre. A toxicological review concluded no adverse effects would be expected based on the reported concentrations. Page 125 Page 122 of 138 Table 23: 2013-2020 Comparison of Maximum Measured Dioxins and Furans Concentrations at the Courtice and Rundle Road Stations Golder assessed the suitability of the meteorological data collected as part of the DYEC Ambient Air Program for use in the development of the AQIA and updated ESDM model as requested by the MECP. The assessment compared data from the Courtice and Rundle Road ambient air monitoring stations to the Oshawa station, operated and maintained by Environment and Climate Change Canada. The data from the stations showed consistent annual trends and was deemed suitable for the inclusion in the CALMET modelling, considering the change in wind sensor height and disqualified data. Page 126 Page 123 of 138 5. Significant Net Effects A review of current monitoring data to complete the EA Screening Criteria checklist determined that a waste capacity increase of 20,000 tonnes per year may cause negative impacts to air quality. To assess the potential changes the waste capacity increase will have on air quality, Golder completed a preliminary assessment, followed by and Air Quality Impact Assessment Report (Golder, 2021). For these assessments current and future operations were reviewed to document the difference in predicted air quality concentrations. Existing “background’ air quality is accounted for to determine how the project will alter the local air quality. The combined impact from the DYEC and existing background air quality was compared to Ambient Air Quality Criteria as indicators of good air quality. A new ESDM has been prepared and will be submitted in support of the ECA Application process and the air modeling was done in support of the AQIA to provide assurance that the DYEC remains in compliance with O.Reg. 419/05. The AQIA used the same modelling system as was used in the previous air quality studies for DYEC. A request was submitted to the MECP to use a newer version of the modelling software to complete the ESDM report. The modeling was accepted and currently waiting on acceptance for source testing. To assist in the modelling exercise, Golder used data obtained from the DYEC Ambient Air monitoring stations, in addition to several other federally maintained meteorological stations closest to the DYEC. Section 4 and 5 of the AQIA describes the Modelling System Description and methodology. The results of the cumulative assessment are anticipated to represent a very concervative conservative scenario as the worst-case meteorological conditions, during 90th percentile ambient air quality conditions and the maximum on-site activities were modelled to occur concurrently. Page 127 Page 124 of 138 The dispersion modelling results were presented with and without background air quality concentrations and compared against the relevant Project Criteria. The cumulative concentrations of all contaminants (with background) are below the Project Criteria for all Indicator Compounds, with the exception of Benzo(a)pyrene, for both the current 140,000 tonnes per year and 160,000 tonnes per year scenario and nitrogen oxides over a 1 hour averaging period during testing of the standby generator. Benzo(a)pyrene is greater than the Project Criteria before any contribution from DYEC is included. Emissions from DYEC contribute less than 1 per cent to the total ambient Benzo(a)pyrene concentration for all scenarios assessed. The standby generator testing occurs for up to one hour, once per week. The assessment assumptions made were very conservative as they considered DYEC operating at maximum capacity, during the worst-case meteorological conditions. While the maximum predicted concentration is greater than the Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) (79 µg/m3), it is much less than the Ontario Ambient Air Quality Criteria (AAQC) (400 µg/m3). Predicted concentrations of Nitrogen Oxides are below the AAQC for normal operations under both the current and future scenarios but exceed the 1-hour AAQC during stand- by diesel generator testing in both the current and future scenarios. Standby generator testing can occur for up to one hour, once per week. To identify the worst case 1-hour concentration, it was assumed that the generator may be tested at any time, therefore emissions were considered for every hour of the 5-year meteorological dataset. However, the CAAQS of 79 µg/m³ is based on the three-year average of the 98th percentile of the daily maximum 1-hour concentrations, therefore, given the frequency of the generator testing, comparing the maximum predicted 1 hour concentration from the modelling is very conservative. This assessment assumes that generator testing occurs while DYEC is operating at maximum capacity and during the hour with worst case meteorological conditions, every day of the year, which is not realistic. Additionally, while the maximum predicted concentration is greater than the CAAQS of 79 µg/m³, it is Page 128 Page 125 of 138 much less than the Ontario AAQC of 400 µg/m³, which is also used as an indicator of good air quality. Maximum NO2 concentrations during generator testing occur at the northern property boundary along Energy Drive (the fence line closest to the generator) and decrease with distance. A comparison of the modelling results from the 140,000 tonnes per year and 160,000 tonnes per year operating scenarios determined that the change in predicted concentrations between the two scenarios is small with maximum predicted concentrations of all Indicator Parameters showing a decrease for future maximum operating scenario of 160,000 tonnes per year operating scenario. Of the 116 combinations of Indicator Parameters and averaging periods assessed, the maximum predicted concentrations of 85 combinations changes by less than 1 per cent. All predicted concentrations vary by less than 17 per cent with all contaminants showing a decrease in predicted concentration, with the magnitude of change dependent on the averaging period. This fluctuation is anticipated to be a result of higher emission rates for the 160,000 tonnes per year combined with the increased flow rate and temperature which would improve dispersion for some meteorological conditions. With background concentrations added to the predicted concentrations for DYEC, the resultant cumulative concentrations vary by even less, due to the high contribution of background concentrations. The maximum change was less than 1 per cent for all contaminants for which background data was available. All predicted concentrations were shown to decrease compared to the current maximum operating scenario. Overall, the AQIA determined that the waste capacity increase of 20,000 tonnes per year is not expected to significantly impact local air quality. It is anticipated that the ESDM will determine that the DYEC will continue to remain in compliance with O.Reg. 419/05 with a waste processing capacity of 160,000 tonnes per year. The ESDM will be submitted in support of the ECA Application. A review of previous studies undertaken in 2009 and updated studies for air and noise predict no significant negative net effects to the environment as a result of the waste capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year. Page 129 Page 126 of 138 Page 130 Page 127 of 138 6. Project Benefits A distinct advantage of processing 160,000 tonnes of waste per year is a result in increased operation efficiency for the DYEC. Operating each boiler at 218 tonnes per day results in the plant reaching 140,000 tonnes processed in approximately 321 days. While each boiler does have periods of downtime throughout the year to allow for cleaning and maintenance activities, these periods are typically less than 44 days per year (365 days – 321 days = 44 days). A disadvantage of operating the facility at less than full capacity, is a result in reduced efficiency of the plant’s operations due to periods of operations which occur at less than full boiler load, or periods where boilers are idled as a result of reaching the annual waste capacity limit. Increasing the DYEC waste processing capacity allows for full use of the existing equipment maximizing the use of the investment without requiring any additional construction or building modifications. Managing waste locally results in an annual net reduction of approximately 262 tonnes of CO2 as well as other transportation related emissions. Waste that cannot be processed at the DYEC must be transported in tractor trailer to alternative disposal locations outside of the Region’s borders. Managing an additional 20,000 tonnes of waste annually at the DYEC will reduce fuel consumption by 98,592 litres annually by removing 416 tractor trailer from the road. Landfill methane generation is also avoided resulting in additional greenhouse gas savings. There is no cost associated with the increase in waste processing capacity since no additional or modified equipment is required. The Regions will realize cost savings from reduced contracted processing fees for waste tonnage in excess of 140,000 tonnes per year (110,000 tonnes for Durham Region) and additional power and materials revenue recoveries due to the additional waste tonnage processed. The 2019 preliminary financial forecast for Durham Region estimated net cost savings related to the DYEC capacity increase to 160,000 tonnes per year. Table 24 below outlines the status quo costs for Durham Region and the anticipated annual savings through 2023. Page 131 Page 128 of 138 Table 4 Estimated Durham Disposal Costs 2019 - 2023 (in millions) Footnotes: 1. Reduced Covanta fee based on deduction of landfill charge and reduced processing fee for tonnages beyond 140,000 tonnes processed (estimated at $35.45 per tonne in 2019, increasing to an estimated $38.03 per tonne by 2023). It is assumed York Region uses its full 21.4 per cent share of amended capacity. 2. Excludes materials recovery facility (MRF) residue tonnes, which are the cost responsibility of the MRF contractor. 3. Landfill fees are assumed to escalate from $70.00 per tonne in 2019 to $80.00 per tonne in 2023. 4. Power revenues escalation estimates are based on 35 per cent CPI per the IESO Power Purchase Agreement. Conservatively, revenues for ferrous and non-ferrous metals recoveries are not assumed to escalate. Page 132 Page 129 of 138 The Clarington Energy Business Park is expanding with recent announcements of future construction. The potential exists to build a district heating system into the development of the Clarington Energy Business Park. Increasing the capacity to 160,000 tonnes will generate additional heat at the DYEC allowing for the potential to supply future occupants with heat at cost savings. York Region waste is processed at three different energy-from-waste facilities, two of which are privately owned. Of the two privately owned facilities, one of them is located in Niagara Falls, New York. Increasing processing capacity at the DYEC will allow York Region to manage more waste at a facility co-owned by the Region while alleviating some of the cross-border risk associated with sending waste to New York State. Page 133 Page 130 of 138 7. Next Steps 7.1 Notice of Completion The ESR will be finalized in January 2022 (Subject to Change). In light of the current situation regarding COVID-19; hard copies will not be placed on display at public locations. An electronic version will be available on the DYEC website. Copies of the ESR will be provided to the MECP Regional EA Coordinator, government agencies and Indigenous communities that have expressed an interest in reviewing the report. Following the completion of the ESR, a Notice of Completion will be published in local newspapers on two separate dates and posted on the DYEC website. The Notice of Completion will also be mailed to the MECP Regional EA Coordinator, adjacent landowners and tenants, Indigenous communities and to all who have expressed an interest in the DYEC capacity increase. 7.2 60 Day Public Review Period The Notice of Completion marks the beginning of a 60-calendar day review period for the ESR. During the review period MECP, other government agencies, Indigenous communities and interested persons have the opportunity to review the completed ESR. 7.3 Opportunity for Elevation Requests Persons who have environmental concerns regarding the project that are not addressed in the ESR can request an elevation of the Screening to an individual EA. However, MECP advises that concerns be brought to the proponent as early as possible in the Screening process so that they may be addressed by the proponent prior to the Notice of Completion. If the proponent has not been able to resolve concerns, concerned persons may write to the MECP Director, Environmental Assessment and Permissions Branch to request that the project be elevated. An elevation request must be made in accordance with the requirements outlined in Section B.3 of the Guide. Elevation requests are considered comments to a public process and will be shared with the proponent and other interested stakeholders. Page 134 Page 131 of 138 7.4 Statement of Completion The final step in the Screening process is submission of the Statement of Completion. If no elevation requests are submitted during the review period or submitted elevation requests are resolved or withdrawn, the Statement of Completion form is completed and submitted to the MECP Director, Environmental Assessment and Permissions Branch and EA Regional Coordinator and placed in the project file. Page 135 Page 132 of 138 8. References 1. The Regional Municipality of Durham and The Regional Municipality of York. July 31, 2009 Environmental Assessment Study Document and Site-Specific Technical Studies. Prepared by Jacques Whitford. Retrieved from https://www.durhamyorkwaste.ca/en/facility-approvals/facility-development- documents.aspx#Environmental-Assessment-Appendix-C---Site-Specific- Technical-Study-Reports 2. Golder Associates Limited. Air Quality Impact of 160,000 tonnes per year Waste at Durham York Energy Centre. Technical Memorandum. February 19, 2019. 3. Guide to Environmental Assessment Requirements for Waste Management Projects” (Guide) https://www.ontario.ca/page/guide-environmental-assessment-requirements- waste-management-projects 4. The York Region Waste Management Master Plan (SM4RT LIVING) https://www.york.ca/wps/wcm/connect/yorkpublic/6f3f1734-1d45-4322-8903- ca7354a2db50/The+York+Region+Waste+Management+Master+Plan+2020.pdf ?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=n50.7-p 5. Supplement to Annex E-5: Comparative Analysis of Thermal Treatment and Remote Landfill on a Lifecycle Basis https://www.durhamyorkwaste.ca/en/facility- approvals/resources/Documents/Annex-E-5-Supplemental_Report.pdf 6. Guideline A-7: Air Pollution Control, Design and Operations Guidelines for Municipal Waste Thermal Treatment Facilities (2010) 7. Ontario Regulation 419/05: Air Pollution - Local Air Quality (as amended) 8. Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) (2013) 9. Ontario’s Ambient Air Quality Criteria (AAQC) (2012 as amended) 10. Ontario Air Standards for Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) (2018) Page 136 Page 133 of 138 11. MECP Publication NPC-300 Environmental Noise Guideline – Stationary and Transportation Sources (2013) 12. Publication NPC-233 Information to be submitted for approval of stationary sources of sound (1995) 13. Environmental Compliance Approval Application for Air and Noise (2011) 14. Application for a Basic Comprehensive Certificate of Approval (Air & Noise) Attachment #3 https://www.durhamyorkwaste.ca/en/resources/Archived%20Documents/Certifica te%20of%20Approval%20Applications/DYEC_Air_Noise_CofA.pdf 15. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change https://archive.ipcc.ch/meetings/session17/doc4.pdf 16. MECP discussion paper: “Reducing Litter and Waste in Our Communities” (2019) https://ero.ontario.ca/notice/013-4689 17. 2020 Storm water Pond (SWP) Inspection Checklist 18. EA Notice to Procced and Facility’s ECA https://www.durhamyorkwaste.ca/en/facility-approvals/environmental- assessment-notice-of-approval.aspx# Page 137 Page 134 of 138 Appendix A - Environmental Screening Checklist Criterion Yes No Additional Information 1.0 Surface Water and Groundwater 1.1 Cause negative effects on surface water quality, quantities or flow? X No change to surface water from existing conditions are anticipated because of the proposed increase in capacity to 160,000 tonnes. 1.2 Cause negative effects on groundwater quality, quantity or movement? X No change to groundwater conditions are anticipated because of the project. 1.3 Cause significant sedimentation or soil erosion or shoreline or riverbank erosion on or offsite? X No sedimentation, soil erosion or shoreline or riverbank erosion are anticipated because of the project. 1.4 Cause negative effects of surface or groundwater from accidental spills or releases to the environment? X No increased risk of spills or accidental releases to surface or groundwater are anticipated because of this project. Total haulage distance of wastes is reduced in comparison to disposal during bypass conditions. 2.0 Land 2.1 Cause negative effects on residential, commercial, institutional or other sensitive land uses within 500 metres from the site boundary? X No negative effects are anticipated because of the change in permitted processing capacity. 2.2 Not be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, provincial land use or resource management plans? X The DYEC is in a designated employment area and the land use continues to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement as revised in 2014. The MECP’s “Reducing Litter and Waste in Our Communities: Discussion Paper” identifies thermal treatment in the form of energy from waste as a potential opportunity to recover the value of resources in waste. 2.3 Be inconsistent with municipal land use policies, plans and zoning bylaws (including municipal setbacks)? X No changes to land use are proposed as part of the throughout increase. 2.4 Use lands not zoned as industrial, heavy industrial or waste disposal? X The Social/Culture Assessment Technical Study completed in 2009 confirmed the lands are zoned employment/light industrial areas which is compatible with the DYEC activity. 2.5 Use hazard lands or unstable lands subject to erosion? X No changes to land use are proposed as part of the throughout increase. 2.6 Cause negative effects related to the remediation of contaminated land? X Not applicable 3.0 Air and noise 3.1 Cause negative effects on air quality due to emissions (for parameter such as temperature, thermal treatment exhaust flue gas volume, NO2, SO2, O2, opacity, HCl, TSP, or other contaminants)? X The potential for environmental effects on air quality exists because of stack emissions. The profile and dispersion characteristics of the stack may change because of the increase in facility throughput. 3.2 Cause negative effects from the emission of GHG (CO2, CO and methane)? X Additional CO and CO2 emissions at the facility are expected with increase waste tonnage to 160,000. However, these additional carbon emissions will be less than the Page 138 Page 135 of 138 Criterion Yes No Additional Information emissions that would result if the same tonnage were transported and disposed of elsewhere, including methane generation in landfills as is currently occurring. 3.3 Cause negative effects from the emission of dust or odour? X Waste will continue to be off-loaded in a closed building under negative air pressure. There is minimal dust from truck traffic and odour as trucks drive around the exterior of the site. Any odour is like that from a garbage truck on a residential street. All driving surfaces are paved minimizing dust creation from all vehicles at the site. 3.4 Cause negative effects from the emission of noise? X No noticeable increase in noise from additional truck traffic or additional volume of waste processed. 3.5 Cause light pollution from trucks or other operational activities at the site? X No additional lighting will be placed on site. 4.0 Natural Environment 4.1 Cause negative effects on rare or threatened or endangered species of flora or fauna or their habitat? X The 2009 Natural Environment Assessment for the original Environmental Assessment established mitigation measures to ensure that facility construction and operations do not have unacceptable adverse impacts on wildlife. These mitigation measures remain in effect and will not be impacted by the proposed increase in waste tonnage to 160,000 tonnes per year. 4.2 Cause negative effects on protected natural areas such as, ANSIs, ESAs or other significant natural areas? X No changes on protected natural areas such as ANSIs ESAs or other significant natural areas are anticipated as the result of the project. 4.3 Cause negative effects on designated wetlands? X No negative effects are anticipated with the increase in waste tonnage to 160,000 tonnes per year. 4.4 Cause negative effects on wildlife habitat, populations, corridors or movement? X No negative effects on wildlife habitat, populations, corridors or movements are anticipated because of the project. 4.5 Cause negative effects on fish or their habitat, spawning, movement or environmental conditions (e.g. water temp, turbidity)? X The 2009 Natural Environment Assessment for the original Environmental Assessment determined there were no permanent watercourses on site and no significant net effects on aquatic species were anticipated. No changes to the assessment are anticipated because of the project. 4.6 Cause negative effects on locally important or valued ecosystems or vegetation? X No negative impacts on locally important or valued ecosystems or vegetation are anticipated because of the project. 4.7 Increase bird hazards within the area that could impact surrounding land uses (e.g. airports)? X No increase to bird hazards within the area are anticipated because of the project. 5.0 Resources 5.1 Result in practices inconsistent with waste studies and/or waste diversion targets (e.g., result in final disposal of materials subject to diversion programs)? X Facility operates in accordance with the EA/ECA. All tonnage received is post diversion materials. The additional requested tonnage is still subject to waste diversion requirements. Additional capacity is not expected to decrease diversion as the waste is already being generated – but is currently by-passed to another waste disposal facility. 5.2 Result in generation of energy that cannot be captured and utilized? X Additional tonnage will result in additional energy generation that will be sold to the provincial grid or used to provide power the DYEC. 5.3 Be located a distance from required infrastructure? X Facility sited at an appropriate distance from waste sources with access to supporting infrastructure. No location issues are anticipated for the project. Page 139 Page 136 of 138 Criterion Yes No Additional Information 5.4 Cause negative effects on the use of Canada Land Inventory Class 1-3, specialty crop or locally significant agricultural lands? X Site is located within an energy business park adjacent to Class 1 agricultural lands. No changes to land use are proposed to accommodate the processing increase. 5.5 Cause negative effects on existing agricultural production? X No impacts on existing agricultural production are anticipated as the result of the throughput increase. 6.0 Socio-Economic 6.1 Cause negative effects on neighborhood or community character? X The Social Cultural Assessment Technical Study completed in 2009 concluded the facility would have minimal to no overall net effects on the community character of the area. No change to community character anticipated as the result of the processing capacity expansion. 6.2 Result in aesthetic impacts (e.g. visual and litter impacts)? X No changes to the facility structure or visual impacts are associated with the project. No additional litter is likely to result from the processing expansion. 6.3 Cause negative effects on local businesses, institutions or public facilities? X No impacts to local businesses, institutions or public facilities are anticipated as part of the processing increase. 6.4 Cause negative effects on recreation, cottaging or tourism? X No impacts to recreation or tourism are anticipated as the result of a processing increase. 6.5 Cause negative effects related to increases in the demands on community services and infrastructure? X No changes or negative impacts related to demands on community services or infrastructure are anticipated because of the capacity increase. 6.6 Cause negative effects on the economic base of a municipality or community? X The Economic Assessment Technical Study Report completed in 2009 determined the facility would have a net positive impact on the economic base of the community. The proposed increase in throughput to 160,000 tonnes will have no impact on the local economic base. Increased capacity increases DYEC efficiency and electrical and metal revenue. Cost savings are anticipated as the result of reducing the need for waste bypass. 6.7 Cause negative effects on local employment and labour supply? X No change in local employment is anticipated with the increased tonnage. 6.8 Cause negative effects related to traffic? X Approximately two additional vehicles per day will visit the site because of the increase in waste tonnage. This level of traffic already occurs during periods when the facility is operating at full capacity. No negative effects are anticipated because of the throughput increase. 6.9 Be located within 8km of an aerodome/airport reference point? X There is a heliport located at the Bowmanville Hospital, although air ambulance service is currently suspended to the facility, it is anticipated that a relocated facility will be established in the future. However, as no exterior changes are being made to the existing facility, and all waste handling will continue to occur indoors, no impacts are anticipated. 6.10 Interfere with flight paths due to the construction of facilities with height (stacks)? X No increase in stack height and no buildings are being constructed with the increased capacity. 6.11 Cause negative effects on public health and safety? X The Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment completed in 2009 determined that overall, the chemical emissions from the facility would not lead to any adverse health risks to residents, farmers or other receptors at the 140,000 tonnes per year operating scenario and minimal risk during upset conditions at the 400,000 tonne per year operating scenario. Additional modelling will be completed in the next stage of the Page 140 Page 137 of 138 Criterion Yes No Additional Information screening process to confirm that no negative impacts will result from the tonnage increase to 160,000 tonnes per year. 7.0 Heritage and Culture 7.1 Cause negative effects on heritage buildings, structures or sites, archaeological sites or areas of archaeological importance, or cultural heritage landscapes? X The increased processing if approved will occur within the existing structure on site, no changes to land, or new construction will occur because of the project. No impacts to cultural, heritage or archaeological sites are anticipated. 7.2 Cause negative effects on scenic or aesthetically pleasing landscapes or views? X The increased processing if approved will occur within the existing structure on site, no changes to land, or new construction will occur because of the project. No impacts to visual appearance of the area are anticipated. 8.0 Aboriginal 8.1 Cause negative effects on land, resources, traditional activities or other interests of Aboriginal communities? X No impacts to land, resources, traditional activities or other interest of Indigenous communities are anticipated as the result of the increased processing capacity to 160,000 tonnes. Consultation and engagement with Indigenous communities will occur to determine if any concerns related to the project exist. 9.0 Other 9.1 Result in the creation of non-hazardous waste materials requiring disposal? X No additional waste materials are generated because of the project. The facility will continue to process collected wastes prior to their disposal, with any residuals being sent to landfill for disposal. 9.2 Result in the creation of hazardous waste materials requiring disposal? X There will continue to be minimal creation of hazardous waste because of the facility operations. Bottom and treated fly ash are both managed as nonhazardous wastes. 9.3 Cause any other negative environmental effects not covered by the criteria outlined above? X No other effects have been identified. Page 141 Page 138 of 138 9. Appendices Appendix B – 2020 Annual Sewage Works Inspection Appendix C – Air Quality Impact of 160,000 tonnes per year Waste at Durham York Energy Centre Appendix D – Acoustic Assessment Report 2021 Appendix E – Air Quality Impact Assessment (AQIA) of 160,000 tonnes per year 2021 Appendix F – Letter from the Ministry of Culture dated February 3, 2012 Appendix G – Notice of Commencement Appendix H – Consultation Summary Report Page 142 Criterion Yes No Additional Information 1.0 Surface Water and Groundwater 1.1 Cause negative effects on surface water quality, quantities or flow? X No change to surface water from existing conditions are anticipated because of the proposed increase in capacity to 160,000 tonnes. 1.2 Cause negative effects on groundwater quality, quantity or movement? X No change to groundwater conditions are anticipated because of the project. 1.3 Cause significant sedimentation or soil erosion or shoreline or riverbank erosion on or offsite? X No sedimentation, soil erosion or shoreline or riverbank erosion are anticipated because of the project. 1.4 Cause negative effects of surface or groundwater from accidental spills or releases to the environment? X No increased risk of spills or accidental releases to surface or groundwater are anticipated because of this project. Total haulage distance of wastes is reduced in comparison to disposal during bypass conditions. 2.0 Land 2.1 Cause negative effects on residential, commercial, institutional or other sensitive land uses within 500 metres from the site boundary? X No negative effects are anticipated because of the change in permitted processing capacity. 2.2 Not be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, provincial land use or resource management plans? X The DYEC is in a designated employment area and the land use continues to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement as revised in 2014. The MECP’s “Reducing Litter and Waste in Our Communities: Discussion Paper” identifies thermal treatment in the form of energy from waste as a potential opportunity to recover the value of resources in waste. 2.3 Be inconsistent with municipal land use policies, plans and zoning bylaws (including municipal setbacks)? X No changes to land use are proposed as part of the throughout increase. 2.4 Use lands not zoned as industrial, heavy industrial or waste disposal? X The Social/Culture Assessment Technical Study completed in 2009 confirmed the lands are zoned employment/light industrial areas which is compatible with the DYEC activity. 2.5 Use hazard lands or unstable lands subject to erosion? X No changes to land use are proposed as part of the throughout increase. 2.6 Cause negative effects related to the remediation of contaminated land? X Not applicable Page 143 Criterion Yes No Additional Information 3.0 Air and noise 3.1 Cause negative effects on air quality due to emissions (for parameter such as temperature, thermal treatment exhaust flue gas volume, NO2, SO2, O2, opacity, HCl, TSP, or other contaminants)? X The potential for environmental effects on air quality exists because of stack emissions. The profile and dispersion characteristics of the stack may change because of the increase in facility throughput. 3.2 Cause negative effects from the emission of GHG (CO2, CO and methane)? X Additional CO and CO2 emissions at the facility are expected with increase waste tonnage to 160,000. However, these additional carbon emissions will be less than the emissions that would result if the same tonnage were transported and disposed of elsewhere, including methane generation in landfills as is currently occurring. 3.3 Cause negative effects from the emission of dust or odour? X Waste will continue to be off-loaded in a closed building under negative air pressure. There is minimal dust from truck traffic and odour as trucks drive around the exterior of the site. Any odour is like that from a garbage truck on a residential street. All driving surfaces are paved minimizing dust creation from all vehicles at the site. 3.4 Cause negative effects from the emission of noise? X No noticeable increase in noise from additional truck traffic or additional volume of waste processed. 3.5 Cause light pollution from trucks or other operational activities at the site? X No additional lighting will be placed on site. 4.0 Natural Environment 4.1 Cause negative effects on rare or threatened or endangered species of flora or fauna or their habitat? X The 2009 Natural Environment Assessment for the original Environmental Assessment established mitigation measures to ensure that facility construction and operations do not have unacceptable adverse impacts on wildlife. These mitigation measures remain in effect and will not be impacted by the proposed increase in waste tonnage to 160,000 tonnes per year. 4.2 Cause negative effects on protected natural areas such as, ANSIs, ESAs or other significant natural areas? X No changes on protected natural areas such as ANSIs ESAs or other significant natural areas are anticipated as the result of the project. 4.3 Cause negative effects on designated wetlands? X No negative effects are anticipated with the increase in waste tonnage to 160,000 tonnes per year. 4.4 Cause negative effects on wildlife habitat, populations, corridors or movement? X No negative effects on wildlife habitat, populations, corridors or movements are anticipated because of the project. Page 144 Criterion Yes No Additional Information 4.5 Cause negative effects on fish or their habitat, spawning, movement or environmental conditions (e.g. water temp, turbidity)? X The 2009 Natural Environment Assessment for the original Environmental Assessment determined there were no permanent watercourses on site and no significant net effects on aquatic species were anticipated. No changes to the assessment are anticipated because of the project. 4.6 Cause negative effects on locally important or valued ecosystems or vegetation? X No negative impacts on locally important or valued ecosystems or vegetation are anticipated because of the project. 4.7 Increase bird hazards within the area that could impact surrounding land uses (e.g. airports)? X No increase to bird hazards within the area are anticipated because of the project. 5.0 Resources 5.1 Result in practices inconsistent with waste studies and/or waste diversion targets (e.g., result in final disposal of materials subject to diversion programs)? X Facility operates in accordance with the EA/ECA. All tonnage received is post diversion materials. The additional requested tonnage is still subject to waste diversion requirements. Additional capacity is not expected to decrease diversion as the waste is already being generated – but is currently by-passed to another waste disposal facility. 5.2 Result in generation of energy that cannot be captured and utilized? X Additional tonnage will result in additional energy generation that will be sold to the provincial grid or used to provide power the DYEC. 5.3 Be located a distance from required infrastructure? X Facility sited at an appropriate distance from waste sources with access to supporting infrastructure. No location issues are anticipated for the project. 5.4 Cause negative effects on the use of Canada Land Inventory Class 1-3, specialty crop or locally significant agricultural lands? X Site is located within an energy business park adjacent to Class 1 agricultural lands. No changes to land use are proposed to accommodate the processing increase. 5.5 Cause negative effects on existing agricultural production? X No impacts on existing agricultural production are anticipated as the result of the throughput increase. 6.0 Socio-Economic 6.1 Cause negative effects on neighborhood or community character? X The Social Cultural Assessment Technical Study completed in 2009 concluded the facility would have minimal to no overall net effects on the community character of the area. No change to community character anticipated as the result of the processing capacity expansion. 6.2 Result in aesthetic impacts (e.g. visual and litter impacts)? X No changes to the facility structure or visual impacts are associated with the project. No additional litter is likely to result from the processing expansion. 6.3 Cause negative effects on local businesses, institutions or public facilities? X No impacts to local businesses, institutions or public facilities are anticipated as part of the processing increase. Page 145 Criterion Yes No Additional Information 6.4 Cause negative effects on recreation, cottaging or tourism? X No impacts to recreation or tourism are anticipated as the result of a processing increase. 6.5 Cause negative effects related to increases in the demands on community services and infrastructure? X No changes or negative impacts related to demands on community services or infrastructure are anticipated because of the capacity increase. 6.6 Cause negative effects on the economic base of a municipality or community? X The Economic Assessment Technical Study Report completed in 2009 determined the facility would have a net positive impact on the economic base of the community. The proposed increase in throughput to 160,000 tonnes will have no impact on the local economic base. Increased capacity increases DYEC efficiency and electrical and metal revenue. Cost savings are anticipated as the result of reducing the need for waste bypass. 6.7 Cause negative effects on local employment and labour supply? X No change in local employment is anticipated with the increased tonnage. 6.8 Cause negative effects related to traffic? X Approximately two additional vehicles per day will visit the site because of the increase in waste tonnage. This level of traffic already occurs during periods when the facility is operating at full capacity. No negative effects are anticipated because of the throughput increase. 6.9 Be located within 8km of an aerodome/airport reference point? X There is a heliport located at the Bowmanville Hospital, although air ambulance service is currently suspended to the facility, it is anticipated that a relocated facility will be established in the future. However, as no exterior changes are being made to the existing facility, and all waste handling will continue to occur indoors, no impacts are anticipated. 6.10 Interfere with flight paths due to the construction of facilities with height (stacks)? X No increase in stack height and no buildings are being constructed with the increased capacity. 6.11 Cause negative effects on public health and safety? X The Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment completed in 2009 determined that overall the chemical emissions from the facility would not lead to any adverse health risks to residents, farmers or other receptors at the 140,000 tonnes per year operating scenario and minimal risk during upset conditions at the 400,000 tonne per year operating scenario. Additional modelling will be completed in the next stage of the screening process to confirm that no negative impacts will result from the tonnage increase to 160,000 tonnes per year. Page 146 Criterion Yes No Additional Information 7.0 Heritage and Culture 7.1 Cause negative effects on heritage buildings, structures or sites, archaeological sites or areas of archaeological importance, or cultural heritage landscapes? X The increased processing if approved will occur within the existing structure on site, no changes to land, or new construction will occur because of the project. No impacts to cultural, heritage or archaeological sites are anticipated. 7.2 Cause negative effects on scenic or aesthetically pleasing landscapes or views? X The increased processing if approved will occur within the existing structure on site, no changes to land, or new construction will occur because of the project. No impacts to visual appearance of the area are anticipated. 8.0 Aboriginal 8.1 Cause negative effects on land, resources, traditional activities or other interests of Aboriginal communities? X No impacts to land, resources, traditional activities or other interest of Indigenous communities are anticipated as the result of the increased processing capacity to 160,000 tonnes. Consultation and engagement with Indigenous communities will occur to determine if any concerns related to the project exist. 9.0 Other 9.1 Result in the creation of non-hazardous waste materials requiring disposal? X No additional waste materials are generated because of the project. The facility will continue to process collected wastes prior to their disposal, with any residuals being sent to landfill for disposal. 9.2 Result in the creation of hazardous waste materials requiring disposal? X There will continue to be minimal creation of hazardous waste because of the facility operations. Bottom and treated fly ash are both managed as nonhazardous wastes. 9.3 Cause any other negative environmental effects not covered by the criteria outlined above? X No other effects have been identified. Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 ID Quadrant Time Comments CB-01C C8 12:43 MH/CB-01B C8 12:44 MH-01D C7 12:45 MH-01A D7 12:46 NI CB-02D C7 12:48 MH/CB-02C C7 12:49 MH-2B C7 12:50 Gravel and leaves to bottom of pipe CB-01A D8 12:46 MH-02 D7 12:52 NI CB-02A C6 12:55 MH-02A D6 12:56 Trench HW-01 E7 12:57 Trench HW-02 F7 12:59 3 piecs trash in swale CB-03 F6 13:01 MH-03 F6 13:00 NI outside residue bldg G5 13:03 North ammonia tank A5 (C-201)13:04 CB-06 B5 (C-201)13:06 MH/CB-05 B6 (C-201)13:07 MH-04 B7 (C-201)13:08 NI Trench HW-03 A7 (C-201)13:09 Trench HW-04 B7 (C-201)13:10 HW-01 D6 (C-201)13:11 2-4 mm dirt build p on South side MH-06 D7 (C-201)13:12 NI MH-07 D7 (C-201)13:13 Pond HW E7 (C-201)13:15 2 cm water and algae on apron Pond Outlet E6 (C-201)13:26 Pond discharging Discharge Point F5 14:45 Reeds and silt build up from upstream 2020 Annual Sewage Works Inspection - November 20, 2020 Drains to East Storm Water Pond *NI: Not inspected* Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 ID Quadrant Time Comments Trench HW-07 (north of fence)C2- (C-201)13:41 No issues Trench HW-08 (inside fence)C2- (C-201)13:41 No issues MH-12 F3 13:45 No issues CB-11 D3 13:48 No issues West of grizzly building D4 13:49 No issues MH/CB-12 E4 13:51 No issues CB-13A F5 13:52 No issues CB-13 F5 13:52 No issues MH-11 G4 13:53 No issues Pond HW G3 13:54 No issues Trench HW-05 (inside fence)B2 14:08 No issues Trench HW-06 (outside fence)B2 14:09 No issues Discharge Point C2 14:10 No issues HW-11 (leads to Grizzly exit road)B4 (C-201)14:14 No issues *NI: Not inspected* 2020 Annual Sewage Works Inspection - November 20, 2020 Drains to West Storm Water Pond Page 153 Golder Associates Ltd. golder.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE Project No. TO CC FROM EMAIL ksarmstrong@golder.com AIR QUALITY IMPACT OF 160,000 TPA WASTE AT DURHAM YORK ENERGY CENTRE Page 154 1.0 INTRODUCTION Page 155 2.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION Figure 1: Base facility Refuse Diagram Page 156 3.0 EMISSION RATES 4.0 MODELLING      Page 157 4.1 Model Domain 4.2 Meteorology, Land Use and Terrain Data 4.3 Receptors 4.4 Building Downwash 4.5 Deposition 4.6 Thermal Internal Boundary Layer 4.7 Averaging Times and Conversions Page 158 4.8 Chemical Transformation Table 1: Background Ozone Concentrations used for Chemical Transformation Modelling Month Ozone Concentrations used in 140,000 TPA Scenario (ppb) Ozone Concentrations used in 160,000 TPA (ppb) Page 159 4.9 Dispersion Modelling Options 4.10 Source Parameters Table 2: Comparison of Modelled Source Parameters Scenario Stack Height [m] Stack Diameter [m] Exit velocity [m/s] Exhaust Temperature [K] 5.0 MODELLING RESULTS Page 160 6.0 BACKGROUND AMBIENT AIR QUALITY AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS 7.0 COMPARISON OF MODELLED SCENARIOS Page 161 8.0 CONCLUSIONS 9.0 CLOSURE Air Quality Specialist Principal & Vice-President Page 162 APPENDIX A Page 163 February 2019 19117255 Main Stack - 160,000 TPA Source Description: Operating Rate: Methodology:Engineering calculations Source:All emission concentrations are guarantees from Covanta where available or have been taken from the Environmental Assessment Train Parameters:Volumetric flow rate per train (At operating point 2')21.31 m³/s at reference conditions of 0% Moisture, 11% Oxygen and 298.15K temperature 26.13 m³/s at operational conditions Total Volumetric flow rate 52.26 m³/s at operational conditions Waste Processing Rate per unit 215.77 Mg/day Annual Hours Required to Process 140, 000 tonnes per annum 7785.93 Hours Sample Calculation 1:Particulate matter emission per train Emission Rate [g/s] = Concentration[mg/dscm] x volumetric flow rate [dm³/s] x 1/1000 [mg/g] =22.41 ug 21 m³1 mol m³s 1,000 m³ =4.78E-01 g s Sample Calculation 2:Bromodichloromethane emission per train Emission Rate [g/s] = Concentration[kg/Mg] x Processing Rate [Mg/day] x 1000 [kg/g] x 1/86400 [day/s] =1.50E-03 kg 216 Mg 1000 Kg 1 day Mg day 1 g 86400 s =3.75E-03 g s Sample Calculation 3:Benzene Annual Emission Rate Emission Rate [g/s] = Hourly Emission Rate [g/s] x Annual Processing Hours [Hours/year] / Total Hours per Year [Hours/year] =1.32E-03 g 7,786 Hours 1 Year s Year 8,760 Hours =1.17E-03 g s Emissions from the main stack under Current Maximum Operating Scenario Both boilers are operating at 110% MCR at operating point 2`. https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 1 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 164 February 2019 19117255 Source Emissions: Contaminant CAS Number Concentration per train Units(1)Concentration Reference Emission Rate per Train [g/s] Total Emission Rate [g/s] Annual Emission Rate [g/s] Carbon Monoxide 630-08-0 4.50E+01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 9.59E-01 1.92E+00 — Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 3.50E+01 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 7.47E-01 1.49E+00 1.33E+00 Total Particulate Matter N/A -1 2.24E+01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.78E-01 9.55E-01 — Filterable TSP N/A -2 9.00E+00 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.92E-01 3.84E-01 — PM10 N/A -3 2.24E+01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.78E-01 9.55E-01 — PM2.5 N/A -4 2.10E+01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.48E-01 8.95E-01 — VOCs as CH4 N/A -5 4.90E+01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.04E+00 2.09E+00 — Lead 7439-92-1 5.00E-02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.07E-03 2.13E-03 — Cadmium 7440-43-9 7.00E-03 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.49E-04 2.98E-04 — Mercury 7439-97-6 1.50E-02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 3.20E-04 6.39E-04 — Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3 9.00E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.92E-02 3.84E-02 — PCDD (I-TEQ)N/A -6 6.00E-08 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 0.0013 µg TEQ/s 0.0026 µg TEQ/s — Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 9.00E+00 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.92E-01 3.84E-01 — Ammonia 7664-41-7 9.90E+00 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.11E-01 4.22E-01 — Nitrogen Oxides 10102-44-0 1.21E+02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 2.57E+00 5.14E+00 — Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)N/A -7 7.22E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.54E-06 3.08E-06 — Aluminum 7429-90-5 3.98E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.47E-04 1.69E-03 — Antimony 7440-36-0 2.74E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 5.84E-05 1.17E-04 — Arsenic 7440-38-2 4.20E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.95E-06 1.79E-05 — Barium 7440-39-3 2.11E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.51E-05 9.01E-05 — Beryllium 7440-41-7 3.33E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 7.10E-06 1.42E-05 — Boron 7440-42-8 1.53E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.26E-03 6.52E-03 — Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 3.20E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 6.82E-06 1.36E-05 1.21E-05 Total Chromium (and compounds)7440-47-3 2.25E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.79E-05 9.59E-05 — Cobalt 7440-48-4 5.79E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.23E-04 2.47E-04 — Nickel 7440-02-0 8.71E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.86E-03 3.71E-03 3.30E-03 Phosphorus 7723-14-0 4.60E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 9.81E-04 1.96E-03 — Silver 7440-22-4 3.35E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 7.14E-05 1.43E-04 — Selenium 7782-49-2 4.80E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.02E-05 2.05E-05 — Thallium 7440-28-0 3.90E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.31E-04 1.66E-03 — Tin 7440-31-5 1.76E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.75E-04 7.50E-04 — Vanadium 7440-62-2 1.16E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.48E-05 4.96E-05 — Zinc 7440-66-6 2.00E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.25E-03 8.50E-03 — 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 2.05E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.36E-05 8.72E-05 — 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 95-94-3 5.15E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.10E-06 2.19E-06 — 1,2,4 – Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 5.15E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.10E-06 2.19E-06 — 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58-90-2 1.74E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.70E-06 7.41E-06 — 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 5.23E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.12E-06 2.23E-06 — 2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 1.03E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.19E-06 4.39E-06 — Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 2.06E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.39E-06 8.79E-06 — Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 5.15E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.10E-06 2.19E-06 — Pentachlorobenzene 608-93-5 1.35E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.88E-06 5.77E-06 — Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 1.45E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.09E-07 6.18E-07 — Acenaphthene 83-32-9 1.86E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.96E-07 7.93E-07 — Anthracene 120-12-7 4.07E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.67E-08 1.73E-07 — https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 2 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 165 February 2019 19117255 Benzo(a)anthracene 56-55-3 1.50E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.20E-08 6.39E-08 — Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 3.83E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.16E-08 1.63E-07 — Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 1.01E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.15E-08 4.30E-08 — Benzo(a)fluorene 238-84-6 2.76E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 5.89E-07 1.18E-06 — Benzo(b)fluorene 243-17-4 1.89E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.03E-07 8.06E-07 — Benzo(ghi)perylene 191-24-2 4.13E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.80E-07 1.76E-06 — Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 3.44E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 7.33E-08 1.47E-07 1.30E-07 Benzo(e)pyrene 192-97-2 8.71E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.86E-07 3.71E-07 — Biphenyl 92-51-3 2.98E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 6.36E-05 1.27E-04 — Chrysene 218-01-9 3.77E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.03E-08 1.61E-07 — Dibenzo(a,c)anthracene 215-58-7 2.68E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 5.71E-07 1.14E-06 — Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 1.21E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.58E-08 5.16E-08 — Fluoranthene 206-44-0 4.16E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.86E-07 1.77E-06 — Fluorine 86-73-7 3.13E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 6.67E-07 1.33E-06 — Indeno(1,2,3 – cd)pyrene 193-39-5 7.54E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.61E-07 3.21E-07 — 1 – methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 9.82E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.09E-06 4.18E-06 — 2 – methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 5.44E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.16E-05 2.32E-05 — Naphthalene 91-20-3 4.23E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 9.01E-06 1.80E-05 — Perylene 198-55-0 1.51E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.22E-08 6.44E-08 — Phenanthrene 85-01-8 9.46E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.02E-06 4.03E-06 — Pyrene 129-00-0 5.02E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.07E-06 2.14E-06 — Tetralin 119-64-2 4.99E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.06E-05 2.12E-05 — O-terphenyl 84-15-1 8.18E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.74E-06 3.49E-06 — Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 4.30E-09 kg/Mg ESDM Report 1.07E-08 2.15E-08 — Benzene 71-43-2 3.10E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 6.61E-04 1.32E-03 1.17E-03 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 1.50E-03 kg/Mg ESDM Report 3.75E-03 7.50E-03 — Bromoform 75-25-2 4.11E-04 kg/Mg ESDM Report 1.03E-03 2.05E-03 — Bromomethane 74-83-9 3.60E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 7.67E-04 1.53E-03 — Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 2.56E-06 kg/Mg ESDM Report 6.39E-06 1.28E-05 — Chloroform 67-66-3 5.10E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.09E-05 2.17E-05 — Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 8.71E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.86E-03 3.71E-03 — Dichloroethene, 1,1 -75-34-3 5.65E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.20E-05 2.41E-05 — Dichloromethane 75-09-2 1.76E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.75E-03 7.50E-03 — Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 1.04E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.21E-05 4.42E-05 — Ethylene Dibromide 106-93-4 2.41E-06 kg/Mg ESDM Report 6.02E-06 1.20E-05 — Formaldehyde 50-00-0 4.75E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.01E-03 2.02E-03 — Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 5.67E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.21E-04 2.42E-04 — Toluene 108-88-3 5.03E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.07E-03 2.14E-03 — Trichloroethane, 1,1,1 -71-55-6 1.43E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.04E-05 6.08E-05 — Trichloroethene 86-42-0 4.92E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.05E-05 2.10E-05 — Trichloroethylene, 1,1,2 -79-01-6 4.92E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.05E-05 2.10E-05 — Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 1.72E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.67E-03 7.34E-03 — Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 4.36E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 9.29E-04 1.86E-03 — Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 6.04E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.29E-02 2.57E-02 — 1. Concentrations are at reference conditions of 0% Moisture, 11% Oxygen and 298.15K temperature https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 3 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 166 February 2019 19117255 Main Stack - 160,000 TPA Source Description: Operating Rate: Methodology:Engineering calculations Source:All emission concentrations are guarantees from Covanta where available or have been taken from the Environmental Assessment Train Parameters:Volumetric flow rate per train (At operating point 1')22.37 m³/s at reference conditions of 0% Moisture, 11% Oxygen and 298.15K temperature 26.18 m³/s at operational conditions Total Volumetric flow rate 52.36 m³/s at operational conditions Waste Processing Rate 231.65 Mg/day Annual Hours Required to Process 160, 000 tonnes per annum 8288.37 Hours Sample Calculation 1:Particulate matter emission per train Emission Rate [g/s] = Concentration[mg/dscm] x volumetric flow rate [dm³/s] x 1/1000 [mg/g] =22.41 mg 22 m³1 g m³s 1,000 mg = 5.01E-01 g s Sample Calculation 2:Bromodichloromethane emission per train Emission Rate [g/s] = Concentration[kg/Mg] x Processing Rate [Mg/day] x 1000 [kg/g] x 1/86400 [day/s] = 1.50E-03 kg 232 Mg 1000 Kg 1 day Mg day 1 g 86400 s = 4.03E-03 g s Sample Calculation 3:Benzene Annual Emission Rate Emission Rate [g/s] = Hourly Emission Rate [g/s] x Annual Processing Hours [Hours/year] / Total Hours per Year [Hours/year] = 8.05E-03 g 8,288 Hours 1 Year s Year 8,760 Hours = 7.62E-03 g s Emissions from the main stack under Proposed Future Operating Scenario with both boilers operational. Both boilers are operating at 110% MCR at operating point 1`. https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 4 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 167 February 2019 19117255 Source Emissions: Contaminant CAS Number Concentration per train Units(1)Concentration Reference Emission Rate per Train [g/s] Total Emission Rate [g/s] Annual Emission Rate [g/s] Carbon Monoxide 630-08-0 4.50E+01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.01E+00 2.01E+00 — Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 3.50E+01 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 7.84E-01 1.57E+00 1.48E+00 Total Particulate Matter N/A -1 2.24E+01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 5.01E-01 1.00E+00 — Filterable TSP N/A -2 9.00E+00 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 2.01E-01 4.03E-01 — PM10 N/A -3 2.24E+01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 5.01E-01 1.00E+00 — PM2.5 N/A -4 2.10E+01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.70E-01 9.40E-01 — VOCs as CH4 N/A -5 4.90E+01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.10E+00 2.19E+00 — Lead 7439-92-1 5.00E-02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.12E-03 2.24E-03 — Cadmium 7440-43-9 7.00E-03 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.57E-04 3.13E-04 — Mercury 7439-97-6 1.50E-02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 3.36E-04 6.71E-04 — Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3 9.00E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.01E-02 4.03E-02 — PCDD (I-TEQ)N/A -6 6.00E-02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 0.0013 µg TEQ/s 0.0027 µg TEQ/s — Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 9.00E+00 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 2.01E-01 4.03E-01 — Ammonia 7664-41-7 9.90E+00 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.22E-01 4.43E-01 — Nitrogen Oxides 10102-44-0 1.21E+02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 2.71E+00 5.41E+00 — Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)N/A -7 7.22E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.62E-06 3.23E-06 — Aluminum 7429-90-5 3.98E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.89E-04 1.78E-03 — Antimony 7440-36-0 2.74E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 6.13E-05 1.23E-04 — Arsenic 7440-38-2 4.20E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 9.40E-06 1.88E-05 — Barium 7440-39-3 2.11E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.73E-05 9.46E-05 — Beryllium 7440-41-7 3.33E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 7.45E-06 1.49E-05 — Boron 7440-42-8 1.53E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.42E-03 6.85E-03 — Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 3.20E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 7.16E-06 1.43E-05 1.35E-05 Total Chromium (and compounds)7440-47-3 2.25E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 5.03E-05 1.01E-04 — Cobalt 7440-48-4 5.79E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.30E-04 2.59E-04 — Nickel 7440-02-0 8.71E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.95E-03 3.90E-03 3.69E-03 Phosphorus 7723-14-0 4.60E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.03E-03 2.06E-03 — Silver 7440-22-4 3.35E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 7.50E-05 1.50E-04 — Selenium 7782-49-2 4.80E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.07E-05 2.15E-05 — Thallium 7440-28-0 3.90E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.73E-04 1.75E-03 — Tin 7440-31-5 1.76E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.94E-04 7.87E-04 — Vanadium 7440-62-2 1.16E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.60E-05 5.20E-05 — Zinc 7440-66-6 2.00E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.46E-03 8.93E-03 — 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 2.05E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.58E-05 9.15E-05 — 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 95-94-3 5.15E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.15E-06 2.30E-06 — 1,2,4 – Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 5.15E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.15E-06 2.30E-06 — 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58-90-2 1.74E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.89E-06 7.78E-06 — 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 5.23E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.17E-06 2.34E-06 — 2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 1.03E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.30E-06 4.61E-06 — Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 2.06E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.61E-06 9.23E-06 — Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 5.15E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.15E-06 2.30E-06 — Pentachlorobenzene 608-93-5 1.35E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.03E-06 6.05E-06 — Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 1.45E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.24E-07 6.49E-07 — Acenaphthene 83-32-9 1.86E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.16E-07 8.32E-07 — Anthracene 120-12-7 4.07E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 9.11E-08 1.82E-07 — https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 5 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 168 February 2019 19117255 Benzo(a)anthracene 56-55-3 1.50E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.36E-08 6.71E-08 — Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 3.83E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.57E-08 1.71E-07 — Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 1.01E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.26E-08 4.52E-08 — Benzo(a)fluorene 238-84-6 2.76E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 6.18E-07 1.24E-06 — Benzo(b)fluorene 243-17-4 1.89E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 4.23E-07 8.46E-07 — Benzo(ghi)perylene 191-24-2 4.13E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 9.24E-07 1.85E-06 — Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 3.44E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 7.70E-08 1.54E-07 1.46E-07 Benzo(e)pyrene 192-97-2 8.71E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.95E-07 3.90E-07 — Biphenyl 92-51-3 2.98E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 6.67E-05 1.33E-04 — Chrysene 218-01-9 3.77E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.43E-08 1.69E-07 — Dibenzo(a,c)anthracene 215-58-7 2.68E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 6.00E-07 1.20E-06 — Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 1.21E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.71E-08 5.41E-08 — Fluoranthene 206-44-0 4.16E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 9.31E-07 1.86E-06 — Fluorine 86-73-7 3.13E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 7.00E-07 1.40E-06 — Indeno(1,2,3 – cd)pyrene 193-39-5 7.54E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.69E-07 3.37E-07 — 1 – methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 9.82E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.20E-06 4.39E-06 — 2 – methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 5.44E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.22E-05 2.43E-05 — Naphthalene 91-20-3 4.23E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 9.46E-06 1.89E-05 — Perylene 198-55-0 1.51E-06 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.38E-08 6.76E-08 — Phenanthrene 85-01-8 9.46E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.12E-06 4.23E-06 — Pyrene 129-00-0 5.02E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.12E-06 2.25E-06 — Tetralin 119-64-2 4.99E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.12E-05 2.23E-05 — O-terphenyl 84-15-1 8.18E-05 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.83E-06 3.66E-06 — Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 4.30E-09 kg/Mg ESDM Report 1.15E-08 2.31E-08 — Benzene 71-43-2 3.10E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 6.94E-04 1.39E-03 1.31E-03 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 1.50E-03 kg/Mg ESDM Report 4.03E-03 8.05E-03 — Bromoform 75-25-2 4.11E-04 kg/Mg ESDM Report 1.10E-03 2.20E-03 — Bromomethane 74-83-9 3.60E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 8.05E-04 1.61E-03 — Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 2.56E-06 kg/Mg ESDM Report 6.86E-06 1.37E-05 — Chloroform 67-66-3 5.10E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.14E-05 2.28E-05 — Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 8.71E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.95E-03 3.90E-03 — Dichloroethene, 1,1 -75-34-3 5.65E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.27E-05 2.53E-05 — Dichloromethane 75-09-2 1.76E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.94E-03 7.88E-03 — Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 1.04E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 2.32E-05 4.64E-05 — Ethylene Dibromide 106-93-4 2.41E-06 kg/Mg ESDM Report 6.46E-06 1.29E-05 — Formaldehyde 50-00-0 4.75E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.06E-03 2.13E-03 — Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 5.67E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.27E-04 2.54E-04 — Toluene 108-88-3 5.03E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.12E-03 2.25E-03 — Trichloroethane, 1,1,1 -71-55-6 1.43E-03 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.19E-05 6.39E-05 — Trichloroethene 86-42-0 4.92E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.10E-05 2.20E-05 — Trichloroethylene, 1,1,2 -79-01-6 4.92E-04 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.10E-05 2.20E-05 — Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 1.72E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 3.85E-03 7.71E-03 — Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 4.36E-02 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 9.76E-04 1.95E-03 — Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 6.04E-01 mg/Rm3 ESDM Report 1.35E-02 2.70E-02 — 1. Concentrations are at reference conditions of 0% Moisture, 11% Oxygen and 298.15K temperature https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 6 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 169 APPENDIX B Page 170 February 2019 19117255 Contaminant CAS No. Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Averaging Period MECP POI Limit [µg/m³]Limiting Effect Schedule Source Benchmark Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] Background Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] 1 – Methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 4.18E-06 24-hour 35.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 4.10E-06 Below B2 1.30E-03 1.30E-03 Below B2 1,2,4 – Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 2.19E-06 24-hour 400 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 2.15E-06 <1%5.00E-02 5.00E-02 <1% 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 95-94-3 2.19E-06 24-hour 1 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 2.15E-06 Below B2 —2.15E-06 Below B2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 8.72E-05 1-hour 30500 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 5.03E-04 <1%3.00E-02 3.05E-02 <1% 2 – Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 2.32E-05 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —2.27E-05 Below De Minimus 2.19E-03 2.21E-03 Below De Minimus 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58-90-2 7.41E-06 24-hour 0.75 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 7.26E-06 Below B2 —7.26E-06 Below B2 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 2.23E-06 24-hour 1.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 2.19E-06 Below B2 —2.19E-06 Below B2 2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 4.39E-06 24-hour 33.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 4.30E-06 Below B2 —4.30E-06 Below B2 Acenaphthene 83-32-9 7.93E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —7.77E-07 Below De Minimus 1.25E-03 1.25E-03 Below De Minimus Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 6.18E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —6.06E-07 Below De Minimus 3.09E-04 3.10E-04 Below De Minimus Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.15E-08 24-hour 500 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.11E-08 <1%1.76E+00 1.76E+00 <1% Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.15E-08 1/2-hour 500 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.49E-07 <1%5.21E+00 5.21E+00 1% Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.15E-08 24-hour 5000 —Sch. 6 URT —2.11E-08 Below URT 1.76E+00 1.76E+00 Below URT Aluminum 7429-90-5 1.69E-03 24-hour 12 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 1.66E-03 Below B2 2.10E-01 2.12E-01 Below B2 Ammonia 7664-41-7 4.22E-01 24-hour 100 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 4.13E-01 <1%—4.13E-01 <1% Ammonia 7664-41-7 4.22E-01 24-hour 1000 —Sch. 6 URT —4.13E-01 Below URT —4.13E-01 Below URT Anthracene 120-12-7 1.73E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.70E-07 Below De Minimus 1.63E-04 1.63E-04 Below De Minimus Antimony 7440-36-0 1.17E-04 24-hour 25 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.14E-04 <1%3.02E-03 3.13E-03 <1% Arsenic 7440-38-2 1.79E-05 24-hour 0.3 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.75E-05 <1%1.81E-03 1.83E-03 <1% Barium 7440-39-3 9.01E-05 24-hour 10 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 8.83E-05 <1%8.18E-03 8.27E-03 <1% Benzene 71-43-2 1.17E-03 Annual 0.45 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 3.71E-05 <1%4.00E-02 4.00E-02 9% Benzene 71-43-2 1.32E-03 24-hour 100 —Sch. 6 URT —1.29E-03 Below URT 1.18E+01 1.18E+01 Below URT Benzene 71-43-2 1.17E-03 Annual 4.5 ——AAV —3.71E-05 <1%4.00E-02 4.00E-02 1% Benzo(a)anthracene 56-55-3 6.39E-08 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —6.26E-08 Below De Minimus 6.77E-05 6.78E-05 Below De Minimus Benzo(a)fluorene 238-84-6 1.18E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.15E-06 Below De Minimus 1.35E-04 1.36E-04 Below De Minimus Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 1.30E-07 Annual 0.00001 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 4.12E-09 <1%5.63E-05 5.63E-05 563% Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 1.47E-07 24-hour 0.005 —Sch. 6 URT —1.44E-07 Below URT 6.77E-05 6.78E-05 Below URT Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 1.30E-07 Annual 0.0001 ——AAV —4.12E-09 <1%5.63E-05 5.63E-05 56% Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 1.63E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.60E-07 Below De Minimus 1.42E-04 1.42E-04 Below De Minimus Benzo(b)fluorene 243-17-4 8.06E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —7.90E-07 Below De Minimus 1.35E-04 1.36E-04 Below De Minimus Benzo(e)pyrene 192-97-2 3.71E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —3.64E-07 Below De Minimus 1.35E-04 1.35E-04 Below De Minimus Benzo(ghi)perylene 191-24-2 1.76E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.72E-06 Below De Minimus 7.07E-05 7.24E-05 Below De Minimus Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 4.30E-08 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —4.22E-08 Below De Minimus 6.77E-05 6.77E-05 Below De Minimus Beryllium 7440-41-7 1.42E-05 24-hour 0.01 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.39E-05 <1%3.02E-04 3.16E-04 3% Biphenyl 92-51-3 1.27E-04 24-hour 175 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 1.25E-04 Below B2 1.36E-03 1.48E-03 Below B2 Boron 7440-42-8 6.52E-03 24-hour 120 Particulate Sch. 3 Standard B1 6.39E-03 <1%8.00E-02 8.64E-02 <1% Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 7.50E-03 24-hour 350 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 7.35E-03 Below B2 2.00E-02 2.73E-02 Below B2 Bromoform 75-25-2 2.05E-03 24-hour 55 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 2.01E-03 <1%3.00E-02 3.20E-02 <1% Bromomethane 74-83-9 1.53E-03 24-hour 1350 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.50E-03 <1%9.00E-02 9.15E-02 <1% Cadmium 7440-43-9 2.98E-04 24-hour 0.025 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.92E-04 1%6.04E-04 8.96E-04 4% Cadmium 7440-43-9 2.98E-04 24-hour 0.25 —Sch. 6 URT —2.92E-04 Below URT 6.04E-04 8.96E-04 Below URT Carbon Monoxide 630-08-0 1.92E+00 1/2-hour 6000 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.33E+01 <1%1.26E+03 1.27E+03 21% Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.28E-05 24-hour 2.4 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.25E-05 <1%7.40E-01 7.40E-01 31% Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.28E-05 24-hour 24 —Sch. 6 URT —1.25E-05 Below URT 7.40E-01 7.40E-01 Below URT Chloroform 67-66-3 2.17E-05 24-hour 1 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.13E-05 <1%2.30E-01 2.30E-01 23% Chloroform 67-66-3 2.17E-05 24-hour 100 —Sch. 6 URT —2.13E-05 Below URT 2.30E-01 2.30E-01 Below URT Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 1.21E-05 Annual 0.00014 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 3.83E-07 <1%—3.83E-07 <1% Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 1.36E-05 24-hour 0.07 —Sch. 6 URT —1.34E-05 Below URT —1.34E-05 Below URT Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 1.21E-05 Annual 0.0014 ——AAV —3.83E-07 0%—3.83E-07 0% Appendix B - 140,000 TPA Emission Summary Table https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 1 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 171 February 2019 19117255 Contaminant CAS No. Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Averaging Period MECP POI Limit [µg/m³]Limiting Effect Schedule Source Benchmark Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] Background Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] Appendix B - 140,000 TPA Emission Summary Table Chrysene 218-01-9 1.61E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.57E-07 Below De Minimus 9.64E-05 9.66E-05 Below De Minimus Cobalt 7440-48-4 2.47E-04 24-hour 0.1 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 2.42E-04 <1%6.04E-04 8.46E-04 <1% Dibenzo(a,c)anthracene 215-58-7 1.14E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.12E-06 Below De Minimus —1.12E-06 Below De Minimus Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 5.16E-08 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —5.05E-08 Below De Minimus 6.77E-05 6.78E-05 Below De Minimus Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 3.71E-03 24-hour 500000 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 3.64E-03 <1%3.23E+00 3.23E+00 <1% Dichloroethene, 1,1 -75-34-3 2.41E-05 24-hour 165 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.36E-05 <1%1.00E-02 1.00E-02 <1% Dichloroethene, 1,1 -75-34-3 2.41E-05 24-hour 1650 —Sch. 6 URT —2.36E-05 Below URT 1.00E-02 1.00E-02 Below URT Dichloromethane 75-09-2 7.50E-03 24-hour 220 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 7.35E-03 <1%1.27E+00 1.28E+00 <1% Dichloromethane 75-09-2 7.50E-03 24-hour 22000 —Sch. 6 URT —7.35E-03 Below URT 1.27E+00 1.28E+00 Below URT N/A -6 0.0026 µg TEQ/s 24-hour 0.1 pg TEQ/m³Guideline 0.0025 pg TEQ/m³3%0.0237 pg TEQ/m³ 0.0262 pg TEQ/m³26% Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 4.42E-05 24-hour 1000 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 4.33E-05 <1%1.24E+00 1.24E+00 <1% Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 4.42E-05 10-minute 1900 Odour Sch. 3 Guideline B1 4.21E-04 <1%5.00E+00 5.00E+00 <1% Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 4.42E-05 24-hour 10000 —Sch. 6 URT —4.33E-05 Below URT 1.24E+00 1.24E+00 Below URT Ethylene Dibromide 106-93-4 1.20E-05 24-hour 3 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.18E-05 <1%5.20E-03 5.21E-03 <1% Fluoranthene 206-44-0 1.77E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.74E-06 Below De Minimus 6.01E-04 6.03E-04 Below De Minimus Fluorine 86-73-7 1.33E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.31E-06 Below De Minimus —1.31E-06 Below De Minimus Formaldehyde 50-00-0 2.02E-03 24-hour 65 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.98E-03 <1%3.38E+00 3.38E+00 5% Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 2.19E-06 24-hour 0.011 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 2.15E-06 Below B2 6.25E-05 6.47E-05 Below B2 Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 3.84E-01 24-hour 20 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 3.76E-01 2%—3.76E-01 2% Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 3.84E-01 24-hour 200 —Sch. 6 URT —3.76E-01 Below URT —3.76E-01 Below URT Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3 3.84E-02 24-hour 1.72 Vegetation Sch. 3 Standard B1 3.76E-02 2%—3.76E-02 2% Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3 3.84E-02 30-day 0.69 Vegetation Sch. 3 Standard B1 4.53E-03 <1%—4.53E-03 <1% Indeno(1,2,3 – cd)pyrene 193-39-5 3.21E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —3.15E-07 Below De Minimus 6.77E-05 6.80E-05 Below De Minimus Lead 7439-92-1 2.13E-03 24-hour 0.5 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.09E-03 <1%4.98E-03 7.07E-03 1% Lead 7439-92-1 2.13E-03 30-day 0.2 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.52E-04 <1%1.92E-03 2.17E-03 1% Lead 7439-92-1 2.13E-03 24-hour 2 —Sch. 6 URT —2.09E-03 Below URT 4.98E-03 7.07E-03 Below URT Mercury 7439-97-6 6.39E-04 24-hour 2 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 6.26E-04 <1%—6.26E-04 <1% Naphthalene 91-20-3 1.80E-05 24-hour 22.5 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.77E-05 <1%2.43E-03 2.45E-03 <1% Naphthalene 91-20-3 1.80E-05 10-minute 50 Odour Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.72E-04 <1%9.77E-03 9.94E-03 <1% Nickel 7440-02-0 3.30E-03 Annual 0.04 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.04E-04 <1%8.59E-04 9.63E-04 2% Nickel 7440-02-0 3.71E-03 24-hour 2 —Sch. 6 URT —3.64E-03 Below URT 4.49E-03 8.13E-03 Below URT Nickel 7440-02-0 3.30E-03 Annual 0.4 ——AAV —1.04E-04 0%2.24E-03 2.34E-03 1% Nitrogen Oxides 10102-44-0 5.14E+00 24-hour 200 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 5.04E+00 3%5.82E+01 6.32E+01 32% Nitrogen Oxides 10102-44-0 5.14E+00 1-hour 400 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.97E+01 7%6.46E+01 9.43E+01 24% O-terphenyl 84-15-1 3.49E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —3.42E-06 Below De Minimus 1.35E-04 1.38E-04 Below De Minimus Pentachlorobenzene 608-93-5 5.77E-06 24-hour 80 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 5.65E-06 Below B2 —5.65E-06 Below B2 Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 8.79E-06 24-hour 20 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 8.61E-06 <1%8.76E-04 8.85E-04 <1% Perylene 198-55-0 6.44E-08 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —6.31E-08 Below De Minimus 1.35E-04 1.35E-04 Below De Minimus Phenanthrene 85-01-8 4.03E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —3.95E-06 Below De Minimus 2.57E-03 2.57E-03 Below De Minimus Phosphorus 7723-14-0 1.96E-03 24-hour 0.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-MD B2 1.92E-03 Below B2 7.00E-02 7.19E-02 Below B2 PM10 N/A -3 9.55E-01 24-hour 50 Particulate —AAQC —1.05E+00 2%—1.05E+00 2% PM2.5 N/A -4 8.95E-01 24-hour 30 Particulate —AAQC —9.87E-01 3%2.04E+01 2.14E+01 71% Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)N/A -7 3.08E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —3.02E-06 Below De Minimus 4.20E-05 4.50E-05 Below De Minimus Pyrene 129-00-0 2.14E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —2.10E-06 Below De Minimus 2.83E-04 2.85E-04 Below De Minimus Selenium 7782-49-2 2.05E-05 24-hour 10 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 2.00E-05 <1%3.02E-03 3.04E-03 <1% Silver 7440-22-4 1.43E-04 24-hour 1 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.40E-04 <1%3.42E-04 4.82E-04 <1% Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1.49E+00 24-hour 275 Health & Vegetation Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.46E+00 <1%1.93E+01 2.08E+01 8% Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1.49E+00 1-hour 690 Health & Vegetation Sch. 3 Standard B1 8.62E+00 1%1.95E+01 2.81E+01 4% Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1.49E+00 1-hour 100 Health & Vegetation Sch. 3 Standard B1 8.62E+00 9%1.95E+01 2.81E+01 28% https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 2 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 172 February 2019 19117255 Contaminant CAS No. Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Averaging Period MECP POI Limit [µg/m³]Limiting Effect Schedule Source Benchmark Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] Background Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] Appendix B - 140,000 TPA Emission Summary Table Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1.33E+00 Annual 10 Health & Vegetation Sch. 3 Standard B1 4.20E-02 <1%6.03E+00 6.07E+00 61% Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1.49E+00 1-hour 690 —Sch. 6 URT —8.62E+00 Below URT 1.95E+01 2.81E+01 Below URT Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 2.42E-04 24-hour 360 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.37E-04 <1%4.90E-01 4.90E-01 <1% Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 2.42E-04 24-hour 3600 —Sch. 6 URT —2.37E-04 Below URT 4.90E-01 4.90E-01 Below URT Tetralin 119-64-2 2.12E-05 24-hour 151.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 2.08E-05 Below B2 1.35E-04 1.56E-04 Below B2 Thallium 7440-28-0 1.66E-03 24-hour 0.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 1.63E-03 Below B2 —1.63E-03 Below B2 Tin 7440-31-5 7.50E-04 24-hour 10 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 7.35E-04 <1%3.02E-03 3.75E-03 <1% Toluene 108-88-3 2.14E-03 24-hour 2000 Odour Sch. 3 Guideline B1 2.10E-03 <1%9.47E+00 9.47E+00 <1% Total Chromium (and compounds)7440-47-3 9.59E-05 24-hour 0.5 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 9.40E-05 <1%2.76E-03 2.85E-03 <1% Total Chromium (and compounds)7440-47-3 9.59E-05 24-hour 5 —Sch. 6 URT —9.40E-05 Below URT 2.76E-03 2.85E-03 Below URT Total Particulate Matter N/A -1 9.55E-01 24-hour 120 Particulate Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.05E+00 <1%3.54E+01 3.64E+01 30% Trichloroethane, 1,1,1 -71-55-6 6.08E-05 24-hour 115000 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 5.96E-05 <1%1.10E-01 1.10E-01 <1% Trichloroethene 86-42-0 2.10E-05 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —2.05E-05 Below De Minimus 5.40E-01 5.40E-01 Above De Minimus Trichloroethylene, 1,1,2 -79-01-6 2.10E-05 24-hour 12 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.05E-05 <1%—2.05E-05 <1% Trichloroethylene, 1,1,2 -79-01-6 2.10E-05 24-hour 1200 —Sch. 6 URT —2.05E-05 Below URT —2.05E-05 Below URT Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 7.34E-03 24-hour 6000 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 7.19E-03 <1%2.15E+00 2.16E+00 <1% Vanadium 7440-62-2 4.96E-05 24-hour 2 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 4.86E-05 <1%1.55E-03 1.60E-03 <1% Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 1.86E-03 24-hour 1 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.82E-03 <1%5.88E-03 7.70E-03 <1% Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 1.86E-03 24-hour 100 —Sch. 6 URT —1.82E-03 Below URT 5.88E-03 7.70E-03 Below URT Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 2.57E-02 24-hour 730 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.52E-02 <1%4.83E+00 4.86E+00 <1% Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 2.57E-02 10-minute 3000 Odour Sch. 3 Guideline B1 2.45E-01 <1%1.94E+01 1.96E+01 <1% Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 2.57E-02 24-hour 7300 —Sch. 6 URT —2.52E-02 Below URT 4.83E+00 4.86E+00 Below URT Zinc 7440-66-6 8.50E-03 24-hour 120 Particulate Sch. 3 Standard B1 8.33E-03 <1%4.00E-02 4.83E-02 <1% https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 3 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 173 February 2019 19117255 Contaminant CAS No. Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Averaging Period MECP POI Limit [µg/m³]Limiting Effect Schedule Source Benchmark Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] Background Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] 1 – Methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 4.39E-06 24-hour 35.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 3.78E-06 Below B2 1.30E-03 1.30E-03 Below B2 1,2,4 – Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 2.30E-06 24-hour 400 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.98E-06 <1%5.00E-02 5.00E-02 <1% 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 95-94-3 2.30E-06 24-hour 1 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 1.98E-06 Below B2 —1.98E-06 Below B2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 9.15E-05 1-hour 30500 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 5.28E-04 <1%3.00E-02 3.05E-02 <1% 2 – Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 2.43E-05 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —2.10E-05 Below De Minimus 2.19E-03 2.21E-03 Below De Minimus 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58-90-2 7.78E-06 24-hour 0.75 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 6.70E-06 Below B2 —6.70E-06 Below B2 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 2.34E-06 24-hour 1.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 2.02E-06 Below B2 —2.02E-06 Below B2 2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 4.61E-06 24-hour 33.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 3.97E-06 Below B2 —3.97E-06 Below B2 Acenaphthene 83-32-9 8.32E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —7.17E-07 Below De Minimus 1.25E-03 1.25E-03 Below De Minimus Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 6.49E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —5.59E-07 Below De Minimus 3.09E-04 3.10E-04 Below De Minimus Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.31E-08 24-hour 500 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.99E-08 <1%1.76E+00 1.76E+00 <1% Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.31E-08 1/2-hour 500 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.60E-07 <1%5.21E+00 5.21E+00 1% Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 2.31E-08 24-hour 5000 —Sch. 6 URT —1.99E-08 Below URT 1.76E+00 1.76E+00 Below URT Aluminum 7429-90-5 1.78E-03 24-hour 12 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 1.53E-03 Below B2 2.10E-01 2.12E-01 Below B2 Ammonia 7664-41-7 4.43E-01 24-hour 100 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 3.82E-01 <1%—3.82E-01 <1% Ammonia 7664-41-7 4.43E-01 24-hour 1000 —Sch. 6 URT —3.82E-01 Below URT —3.82E-01 Below URT Anthracene 120-12-7 1.82E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.57E-07 Below De Minimus 1.63E-04 1.63E-04 Below De Minimus Antimony 7440-36-0 1.23E-04 24-hour 25 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.06E-04 <1%3.02E-03 3.13E-03 <1% Arsenic 7440-38-2 1.88E-05 24-hour 0.3 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.62E-05 <1%1.81E-03 1.83E-03 <1% Barium 7440-39-3 9.46E-05 24-hour 10 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 8.15E-05 <1%8.18E-03 8.26E-03 <1% Benzene 71-43-2 1.31E-03 Annual 0.45 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 3.77E-05 <1%4.00E-02 4.00E-02 9% Benzene 71-43-2 1.39E-03 24-hour 100 —Sch. 6 URT —1.19E-03 Below URT 1.18E+01 1.18E+01 Below URT Benzene 71-43-2 1.31E-03 Annual 4.5 ——AAV —3.77E-05 <1%4.00E-02 4.00E-02 1% Benzo(a)anthracene 56-55-3 6.71E-08 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —5.78E-08 Below De Minimus 6.77E-05 6.78E-05 Below De Minimus Benzo(a)fluorene 238-84-6 1.24E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.07E-06 Below De Minimus 1.35E-04 1.36E-04 Below De Minimus Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 1.46E-07 Annual 0.00001 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 4.18E-09 <1%5.63E-05 5.63E-05 563% Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 1.54E-07 24-hour 0.005 —Sch. 6 URT —1.33E-07 Below URT 6.77E-05 6.78E-05 Below URT Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 1.46E-07 Annual 0.0001 ——AAV —4.18E-09 <1%5.63E-05 5.63E-05 56% Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 1.71E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.48E-07 Below De Minimus 1.42E-04 1.42E-04 Below De Minimus Benzo(b)fluorene 243-17-4 8.46E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —7.29E-07 Below De Minimus 1.35E-04 1.36E-04 Below De Minimus Benzo(e)pyrene 192-97-2 3.90E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —3.36E-07 Below De Minimus 1.35E-04 1.35E-04 Below De Minimus Benzo(ghi)perylene 191-24-2 1.85E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.59E-06 Below De Minimus 7.07E-05 7.23E-05 Below De Minimus Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 4.52E-08 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —3.89E-08 Below De Minimus 6.77E-05 6.77E-05 Below De Minimus Beryllium 7440-41-7 1.49E-05 24-hour 0.01 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.28E-05 <1%3.02E-04 3.15E-04 3% Biphenyl 92-51-3 1.33E-04 24-hour 175 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 1.15E-04 Below B2 1.36E-03 1.47E-03 Below B2 Boron 7440-42-8 6.85E-03 24-hour 120 Particulate Sch. 3 Standard B1 5.90E-03 <1%8.00E-02 8.59E-02 <1% Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 8.05E-03 24-hour 350 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 6.93E-03 Below B2 2.00E-02 2.69E-02 Below B2 Bromoform 75-25-2 2.20E-03 24-hour 55 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.90E-03 <1%3.00E-02 3.19E-02 <1% Bromomethane 74-83-9 1.61E-03 24-hour 1350 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.39E-03 <1%9.00E-02 9.14E-02 <1% Cadmium 7440-43-9 3.13E-04 24-hour 0.025 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.70E-04 1%6.04E-04 8.74E-04 3% Cadmium 7440-43-9 3.13E-04 24-hour 0.25 —Sch. 6 URT —2.70E-04 Below URT 6.04E-04 8.74E-04 Below URT Carbon Monoxide 630-08-0 2.01E+00 1/2-hour 6000 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.39E+01 <1%1.26E+03 1.27E+03 21% Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.37E-05 24-hour 2.4 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.18E-05 <1%7.40E-01 7.40E-01 31% Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 1.37E-05 24-hour 24 —Sch. 6 URT —1.18E-05 Below URT 7.40E-01 7.40E-01 Below URT Chloroform 67-66-3 2.28E-05 24-hour 1 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.97E-05 <1%2.30E-01 2.30E-01 23% Chloroform 67-66-3 2.28E-05 24-hour 100 —Sch. 6 URT —1.97E-05 Below URT 2.30E-01 2.30E-01 Below URT Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 1.35E-05 Annual 0.00014 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 3.89E-07 <1%—3.89E-07 <1% Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 1.43E-05 24-hour 0.07 —Sch. 6 URT —1.23E-05 Below URT —1.23E-05 Below URT Appendix B - 160,000 TPA Emission Summary Table https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 4 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 174 February 2019 19117255 Contaminant CAS No. Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Averaging Period MECP POI Limit [µg/m³]Limiting Effect Schedule Source Benchmark Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] Background Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] Appendix B - 160,000 TPA Emission Summary Table Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 1.35E-05 Annual 0.0014 ——AAV —3.89E-07 0%—3.89E-07 0% Chrysene 218-01-9 1.69E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.45E-07 Below De Minimus 9.64E-05 9.65E-05 Below De Minimus Cobalt 7440-48-4 2.59E-04 24-hour 0.1 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 2.23E-04 <1%6.04E-04 8.27E-04 <1% Dibenzo(a,c)anthracene 215-58-7 1.20E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.03E-06 Below De Minimus —1.03E-06 Below De Minimus Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 5.41E-08 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —4.66E-08 Below De Minimus 6.77E-05 6.77E-05 Below De Minimus Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 3.90E-03 24-hour 500000 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 3.36E-03 <1%3.23E+00 3.23E+00 <1% Dichloroethene, 1,1 -75-34-3 2.53E-05 24-hour 165 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.18E-05 <1%1.00E-02 1.00E-02 <1% Dichloroethene, 1,1 -75-34-3 2.53E-05 24-hour 1650 —Sch. 6 URT —2.18E-05 Below URT 1.00E-02 1.00E-02 Below URT Dichloromethane 75-09-2 7.88E-03 24-hour 220 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 6.78E-03 <1%1.27E+00 1.28E+00 <1% Dichloromethane 75-09-2 7.88E-03 24-hour 22000 —Sch. 6 URT —6.78E-03 Below URT 1.27E+00 1.28E+00 Below URT N/A -6 2.68E-03 24-hour 0.1 pg TEQ/m³Guideline 0.0023 pg TEQ/m³2%0.0237 pg TEQ/m³ 0.026 pg TEQ/m³26% Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 4.64E-05 24-hour 1000 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 3.99E-05 <1%1.24E+00 1.24E+00 <1% Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 4.64E-05 10-minute 1900 Odour Sch. 3 Guideline B1 4.42E-04 <1%5.00E+00 5.00E+00 <1% Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 4.64E-05 24-hour 10000 —Sch. 6 URT —3.99E-05 Below URT 1.24E+00 1.24E+00 Below URT Ethylene Dibromide 106-93-4 1.29E-05 24-hour 3 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.11E-05 <1%5.20E-03 5.21E-03 <1% Fluoranthene 206-44-0 1.86E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.60E-06 Below De Minimus 6.01E-04 6.03E-04 Below De Minimus Fluorine 86-73-7 1.40E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.21E-06 Below De Minimus —1.21E-06 Below De Minimus Formaldehyde 50-00-0 2.13E-03 24-hour 65 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.83E-03 <1%3.38E+00 3.38E+00 5% Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 2.30E-06 24-hour 0.011 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 1.98E-06 Below B2 6.25E-05 6.45E-05 Below B2 Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 4.03E-01 24-hour 20 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 3.47E-01 2%—3.47E-01 2% Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 4.03E-01 24-hour 200 —Sch. 6 URT —3.47E-01 Below URT —3.47E-01 Below URT Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3 4.03E-02 24-hour 1.72 Vegetation Sch. 3 Standard B1 3.47E-02 2%—3.47E-02 2% Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3 4.03E-02 30-day 0.69 Vegetation Sch. 3 Standard B1 4.32E-03 <1%—4.32E-03 <1% Indeno(1,2,3 – cd)pyrene 193-39-5 3.37E-07 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —2.91E-07 Below De Minimus 6.77E-05 6.80E-05 Below De Minimus Lead 7439-92-1 2.24E-03 24-hour 0.5 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.93E-03 <1%4.98E-03 6.91E-03 1% Lead 7439-92-1 2.24E-03 30-day 0.2 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.40E-04 <1%1.92E-03 2.16E-03 1% Lead 7439-92-1 2.24E-03 24-hour 2 —Sch. 6 URT —1.93E-03 Below URT 4.98E-03 6.91E-03 Below URT Mercury 7439-97-6 6.71E-04 24-hour 2 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 5.78E-04 <1%—5.78E-04 <1% Naphthalene 91-20-3 1.89E-05 24-hour 22.5 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.63E-05 <1%2.43E-03 2.45E-03 <1% Naphthalene 91-20-3 1.89E-05 10-minute 50 Odour Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.80E-04 <1%9.77E-03 9.95E-03 <1% Nickel 7440-02-0 3.69E-03 Annual 0.04 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.06E-04 <1%8.59E-04 9.65E-04 2% Nickel 7440-02-0 3.90E-03 24-hour 2 —Sch. 6 URT —3.36E-03 Below URT 4.49E-03 7.85E-03 Below URT Nickel 7440-02-0 3.69E-03 Annual 0.4 ——AAV —1.06E-04 <1%2.24E-03 2.35E-03 1% Nitrogen Oxides 10102-44-0 5.41E+00 24-hour 200 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 4.66E+00 2%5.82E+01 6.29E+01 31% Nitrogen Oxides 10102-44-0 5.41E+00 1-hour 400 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 3.13E+01 8%6.46E+01 9.59E+01 24% O-terphenyl 84-15-1 3.66E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —3.15E-06 Below De Minimus 1.35E-04 1.38E-04 Below De Minimus Pentachlorobenzene 608-93-5 6.05E-06 24-hour 80 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 5.21E-06 Below B2 —5.21E-06 Below B2 Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 9.23E-06 24-hour 20 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 7.95E-06 <1%8.76E-04 8.84E-04 <1% Perylene 198-55-0 6.76E-08 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —5.82E-08 Below De Minimus 1.35E-04 1.35E-04 Below De Minimus Phenanthrene 85-01-8 4.23E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —3.65E-06 Below De Minimus 2.57E-03 2.57E-03 Below De Minimus Phosphorus 7723-14-0 2.06E-03 24-hour 0.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-MD B2 1.77E-03 Below B2 7.00E-02 7.18E-02 Below B2 PM10 N/A -3 1.00E+00 24-hour 50 Particulate —AAQC —9.74E-01 2%—9.74E-01 2% PM2.5 N/A -4 9.40E-01 24-hour 30 Particulate —AAQC —9.20E-01 3%2.04E+01 2.13E+01 71% Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)N/A -7 3.23E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —2.78E-06 Below De Minimus 4.20E-05 4.48E-05 Below De Minimus Pyrene 129-00-0 2.25E-06 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.93E-06 Below De Minimus 2.83E-04 2.85E-04 Below De Minimus Selenium 7782-49-2 2.15E-05 24-hour 10 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.85E-05 <1%3.02E-03 3.04E-03 <1% Silver 7440-22-4 1.50E-04 24-hour 1 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.29E-04 <1%3.42E-04 4.71E-04 <1% Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1.57E+00 24-hour 275 ealth & Vegetatio Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.35E+00 <1%1.93E+01 2.07E+01 8% https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 5 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder Associates H n Page 175 February 2019 19117255 Contaminant CAS No. Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Averaging Period MECP POI Limit [µg/m³]Limiting Effect Schedule Source Benchmark Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] Background Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Percentage of MECP Limit [%] Emission Summary Table Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1.57E+00 1-hour 690 ealth & Vegetatio Sch. 3 Standard B1 9.05E+00 1%1.95E+01 2.86E+01 4% Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1.57E+00 1-hour 100 ealth & Vegetatio Sch. 3 Standard B1 9.05E+00 9%1.95E+01 2.86E+01 29% Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1.48E+00 Annual 10 ealth & Vegetatio Sch. 3 Standard B1 4.26E-02 <1%6.03E+00 6.07E+00 61% Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1.57E+00 1-hour 690 —Sch. 6 URT —9.05E+00 Below URT 1.95E+01 2.86E+01 Below URT Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 2.54E-04 24-hour 360 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.19E-04 <1%4.90E-01 4.90E-01 <1% Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 2.54E-04 24-hour 3600 —Sch. 6 URT —2.19E-04 Below URT 4.90E-01 4.90E-01 Below URT Tetralin 119-64-2 2.23E-05 24-hour 151.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 1.92E-05 Below B2 1.35E-04 1.54E-04 Below B2 Thallium 7440-28-0 1.75E-03 24-hour 0.5 Health Sch. 3 SL-JSL B2 1.50E-03 Below B2 —1.50E-03 Below B2 Tin 7440-31-5 7.87E-04 24-hour 10 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 6.78E-04 <1%3.02E-03 3.70E-03 <1% Toluene 108-88-3 2.25E-03 24-hour 2000 Odour Sch. 3 Guideline B1 1.94E-03 <1%9.47E+00 9.47E+00 <1% Total Chromium (and compounds)7440-47-3 1.01E-04 24-hour 0.5 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 8.67E-05 <1%2.76E-03 2.85E-03 <1% Total Chromium (and compounds)7440-47-3 1.01E-04 24-hour 5 —Sch. 6 URT —8.67E-05 Below URT 2.76E-03 2.85E-03 Below URT Total Particulate Matter N/A -1 1.00E+00 24-hour 120 Particulate Sch. 3 Guideline B1 9.74E-01 <1%3.54E+01 3.64E+01 30% Trichloroethane, 1,1,1 -71-55-6 6.39E-05 24-hour 115000 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 5.50E-05 <1%1.10E-01 1.10E-01 <1% Trichloroethene 86-42-0 2.20E-05 24-hour 0.1 ——De Minimus —1.89E-05 Below De Minimus 5.40E-01 5.40E-01 Above De Minimus Trichloroethylene, 1,1,2 -79-01-6 2.20E-05 24-hour 12 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.89E-05 <1%—1.89E-05 <1% Trichloroethylene, 1,1,2 -79-01-6 2.20E-05 24-hour 1200 —Sch. 6 URT —1.89E-05 Below URT —1.89E-05 Below URT Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 7.71E-03 24-hour 6000 Health Sch. 3 Guideline B1 6.64E-03 <1%2.15E+00 2.16E+00 <1% Vanadium 7440-62-2 5.20E-05 24-hour 2 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 4.48E-05 <1%1.55E-03 1.59E-03 <1% Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 1.95E-03 24-hour 1 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 1.68E-03 <1%5.88E-03 7.56E-03 <1% Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 1.95E-03 24-hour 100 —Sch. 6 URT —1.68E-03 Below URT 5.88E-03 7.56E-03 Below URT Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 2.70E-02 24-hour 730 Health Sch. 3 Standard B1 2.33E-02 <1%4.83E+00 4.85E+00 <1% Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 2.70E-02 10-minute 3000 Odour Sch. 3 Guideline B1 2.57E-01 <1%1.94E+01 1.97E+01 <1% Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 2.70E-02 24-hour 7300 —Sch. 6 URT —2.33E-02 Below URT 4.83E+00 4.85E+00 Below URT Zinc 7440-66-6 8.93E-03 24-hour 120 Particulate Sch. 3 Standard B1 7.69E-03 <1%4.00E-02 4.77E-02 <1% https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 6 of 6 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder Associates Appendix B - 160,000 TPA H n H n H n Page 176 APPENDIX C Page 177 February 2019 19117255 Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] 1 – Methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 24-hour 1.30E-03 4.18E-06 4.10E-06 1.30E-03 1,2,4 – Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 24-hour 5.00E-02 2.19E-06 2.15E-06 5.00E-02 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 95-94-3 24-hour —2.19E-06 2.15E-06 2.15E-06 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 1-hour 3.00E-02 8.72E-05 5.03E-04 3.05E-02 2 – Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 24-hour 2.19E-03 2.32E-05 2.27E-05 2.21E-03 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58-90-2 24-hour —7.41E-06 7.26E-06 7.26E-06 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 24-hour —2.23E-06 2.19E-06 2.19E-06 2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 24-hour —4.39E-06 4.30E-06 4.30E-06 Acenaphthene 83-32-9 24-hour 1.25E-03 7.93E-07 7.77E-07 1.25E-03 Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 24-hour 3.09E-04 6.18E-07 6.06E-07 3.10E-04 Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 24-hour 1.76E+00 2.15E-08 2.11E-08 1.76E+00 Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 1/2-hour 5.21E+00 2.15E-08 1.49E-07 5.21E+00 Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 24-hour 1.76E+00 2.15E-08 2.11E-08 1.76E+00 Aluminum 7429-90-5 24-hour 2.10E-01 1.69E-03 1.66E-03 2.12E-01 Ammonia 7664-41-7 24-hour —4.22E-01 4.13E-01 4.13E-01 Ammonia 7664-41-7 24-hour —4.22E-01 4.13E-01 4.13E-01 Anthracene 120-12-7 24-hour 1.63E-04 1.73E-07 1.70E-07 1.63E-04 Antimony 7440-36-0 24-hour 3.02E-03 1.17E-04 1.14E-04 3.13E-03 Arsenic 7440-38-2 24-hour 1.81E-03 1.79E-05 1.75E-05 1.83E-03 Barium 7440-39-3 24-hour 8.18E-03 9.01E-05 8.83E-05 8.27E-03 Benzene 71-43-2 Annual 4.00E-02 1.17E-03 3.71E-05 4.00E-02 Benzene 71-43-2 24-hour 1.18E+01 1.32E-03 1.29E-03 1.18E+01 Benzene 71-43-2 Annual 4.00E-02 1.17E-03 3.71E-05 4.00E-02 Benzo(a)anthracene 56-55-3 24-hour 6.77E-05 6.39E-08 6.26E-08 6.78E-05 Benzo(a)fluorene 238-84-6 24-hour 1.35E-04 1.18E-06 1.15E-06 1.36E-04 Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 Annual 5.63E-05 1.30E-07 4.12E-09 5.63E-05 Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 24-hour 6.77E-05 1.47E-07 1.44E-07 6.78E-05 Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 Annual 5.63E-05 1.30E-07 4.12E-09 5.63E-05 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 24-hour 1.42E-04 1.63E-07 1.60E-07 1.42E-04 Benzo(b)fluorene 243-17-4 24-hour 1.35E-04 8.06E-07 7.90E-07 1.36E-04 Benzo(e)pyrene 192-97-2 24-hour 1.35E-04 3.71E-07 3.64E-07 1.35E-04 Benzo(ghi)perylene 191-24-2 24-hour 7.07E-05 1.76E-06 1.72E-06 7.24E-05 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 24-hour 6.77E-05 4.30E-08 4.22E-08 6.77E-05 Beryllium 7440-41-7 24-hour 3.02E-04 1.42E-05 1.39E-05 3.16E-04 Biphenyl 92-51-3 24-hour 1.36E-03 1.27E-04 1.25E-04 1.48E-03 Boron 7440-42-8 24-hour 8.00E-02 6.52E-03 6.39E-03 8.64E-02 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 24-hour 2.00E-02 7.50E-03 7.35E-03 2.73E-02 Bromoform 75-25-2 24-hour 3.00E-02 2.05E-03 2.01E-03 3.20E-02 Bromomethane 74-83-9 24-hour 9.00E-02 1.53E-03 1.50E-03 9.15E-02 Cadmium 7440-43-9 24-hour 6.04E-04 2.98E-04 2.92E-04 8.96E-04 Cadmium 7440-43-9 24-hour 6.04E-04 2.98E-04 2.92E-04 8.96E-04 Carbon Monoxide 630-08-0 1/2-hour 1.26E+03 1.92E+00 1.33E+01 1.27E+03 Percentage Change of Maximum POI Concentration [%] Percentage Change of Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [%] Appendix C Comparion of Predicted Concentrations 140,000 TPA 160,000 TPA Contaminant CAS No. Averaging Period Background Concentration [µg/m³] ttps://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 age 1 of 3 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder Associates h P Page 178 February 2019 19117255 Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Percentage Change of Maximum POI Concentration [%] Percentage Change of Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [%] Appendix C Comparion of Predicted Concentrations 140,000 TPA 160,000 TPA Contaminant CAS No. Averaging Period Background Concentration [µg/m³] Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 24-hour 7.40E-01 1.28E-05 1.25E-05 7.40E-01 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 24-hour 7.40E-01 1.28E-05 1.25E-05 7.40E-01 Chloroform 67-66-3 24-hour 2.30E-01 2.17E-05 2.13E-05 2.30E-01 Chloroform 67-66-3 24-hour 2.30E-01 2.17E-05 2.13E-05 2.30E-01 Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 Annual —1.21E-05 3.83E-07 3.83E-07 Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 24-hour —1.36E-05 1.34E-05 1.34E-05 Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 Annual —1.21E-05 3.83E-07 3.83E-07 Chrysene 218-01-9 24-hour 9.64E-05 1.61E-07 1.57E-07 9.66E-05 Cobalt 7440-48-4 24-hour 6.04E-04 2.47E-04 2.42E-04 8.46E-04 Dibenzo(a,c)anthracene 215-58-7 24-hour —1.14E-06 1.12E-06 1.12E-06 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 24-hour 6.77E-05 5.16E-08 5.05E-08 6.78E-05 Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 24-hour 3.23E+00 3.71E-03 3.64E-03 3.23E+00 Dichloroethene, 1,1 -75-34-3 24-hour 1.00E-02 2.41E-05 2.36E-05 1.00E-02 Dichloroethene, 1,1 -75-34-3 24-hour 1.00E-02 2.41E-05 2.36E-05 1.00E-02 Dichloromethane 75-09-2 24-hour 1.27E+00 7.50E-03 7.35E-03 1.28E+00 Dichloromethane 75-09-2 24-hour 1.27E+00 7.50E-03 7.35E-03 1.28E+00 N/A -6 24-hour 2.37E-02 2.56E-03 2.51E-03 2.62E-02 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 24-hour 1.24E+00 4.42E-05 4.33E-05 1.24E+00 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 10-minute 5.00E+00 4.42E-05 4.21E-04 5.00E+00 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 24-hour 1.24E+00 4.42E-05 4.33E-05 1.24E+00 Ethylene Dibromide 106-93-4 24-hour 5.20E-03 1.20E-05 1.18E-05 5.21E-03 Fluoranthene 206-44-0 24-hour 6.01E-04 1.77E-06 1.74E-06 6.03E-04 Fluorine 86-73-7 24-hour —1.33E-06 1.31E-06 1.31E-06 Formaldehyde 50-00-0 24-hour 3.38E+00 2.02E-03 1.98E-03 3.38E+00 Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 24-hour 6.25E-05 2.19E-06 2.15E-06 6.47E-05 Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 24-hour —3.84E-01 3.76E-01 3.76E-01 Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 24-hour —3.84E-01 3.76E-01 3.76E-01 Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3 24-hour —3.84E-02 3.76E-02 3.76E-02 Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3 30-day —3.84E-02 4.53E-03 4.53E-03 Indeno(1,2,3 – cd)pyrene 193-39-5 24-hour 6.77E-05 3.21E-07 3.15E-07 6.80E-05 Lead 7439-92-1 24-hour 4.98E-03 2.13E-03 2.09E-03 7.07E-03 Lead 7439-92-1 30-day 1.92E-03 2.13E-03 2.52E-04 2.17E-03 Lead 7439-92-1 24-hour 4.98E-03 2.13E-03 2.09E-03 7.07E-03 Mercury 7439-97-6 24-hour —6.39E-04 6.26E-04 6.26E-04 Naphthalene 91-20-3 24-hour 2.43E-03 1.80E-05 1.77E-05 2.45E-03 Naphthalene 91-20-3 10-minute 9.77E-03 1.80E-05 1.72E-04 9.94E-03 Nickel 7440-02-0 Annual 8.59E-04 3.30E-03 1.04E-04 9.63E-04 Nickel 7440-02-0 24-hour 4.49E-03 3.71E-03 3.64E-03 8.13E-03 Nickel 7440-02-0 Annual 2.24E-03 3.30E-03 1.04E-04 2.34E-03 Nitrogen Oxides 10102-44-0 24-hour 5.82E+01 5.14E+00 5.04E+00 6.32E+01 Nitrogen Oxides 10102-44-0 1-hour 6.46E+01 5.14E+00 2.97E+01 9.43E+01 https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 2 of 3 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 179 February 2019 19117255 Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Percentage Change of Maximum POI Concentration [%] Percentage Change of Maximum POI Concentration (Including Background) [%] Appendix C Comparion of Predicted Concentrations 140,000 TPA 160,000 TPA Contaminant CAS No. Averaging Period Background Concentration [µg/m³] O-terphenyl 84-15-1 24-hour 1.35E-04 3.49E-06 3.42E-06 1.38E-04 Pentachlorobenzene 608-93-5 24-hour —5.77E-06 5.65E-06 5.65E-06 Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 24-hour 8.76E-04 8.79E-06 8.61E-06 8.85E-04 Perylene 198-55-0 24-hour 1.35E-04 6.44E-08 6.31E-08 1.35E-04 Phenanthrene 85-01-8 24-hour 2.57E-03 4.03E-06 3.95E-06 2.57E-03 Phosphorus 7723-14-0 24-hour 7.00E-02 1.96E-03 1.92E-03 7.19E-02 PM10 N/A -3 24-hour —9.55E-01 1.05E+00 1.05E+00 PM2.5 N/A -4 24-hour 2.04E+01 8.95E-01 9.87E-01 2.14E+01 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) N/A -7 24-hour 4.20E-05 3.08E-06 3.02E-06 4.50E-05 Pyrene 129-00-0 24-hour 2.83E-04 2.14E-06 2.10E-06 2.85E-04 Selenium 7782-49-2 24-hour 3.02E-03 2.05E-05 2.00E-05 3.04E-03 Silver 7440-22-4 24-hour 3.42E-04 1.43E-04 1.40E-04 4.82E-04 Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 24-hour 1.93E+01 1.49E+00 1.46E+00 2.08E+01 Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1-hour 1.95E+01 1.49E+00 8.62E+00 2.81E+01 Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1-hour 1.95E+01 1.49E+00 8.62E+00 2.81E+01 Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 Annual 6.03E+00 1.33E+00 4.20E-02 6.07E+00 Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-5 1-hour 1.95E+01 1.49E+00 8.62E+00 2.81E+01 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 24-hour 4.90E-01 2.42E-04 2.37E-04 4.90E-01 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 24-hour 4.90E-01 2.42E-04 2.37E-04 4.90E-01 Tetralin 119-64-2 24-hour 1.35E-04 2.12E-05 2.08E-05 1.56E-04 Thallium 7440-28-0 24-hour —1.66E-03 1.63E-03 1.63E-03 Tin 7440-31-5 24-hour 3.02E-03 7.50E-04 7.35E-04 3.75E-03 Toluene 108-88-3 24-hour 9.47E+00 2.14E-03 2.10E-03 9.47E+00 Total Chromium (and compounds) 7440-47-3 24-hour 2.76E-03 9.59E-05 9.40E-05 2.85E-03 Total Chromium (and compounds) 7440-47-3 24-hour 2.76E-03 9.59E-05 9.40E-05 2.85E-03 Total Particulate Matter N/A -1 24-hour 3.54E+01 9.55E-01 1.05E+00 3.64E+01 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1 -71-55-6 24-hour 1.10E-01 6.08E-05 5.96E-05 1.10E-01 Trichloroethene 86-42-0 24-hour 5.40E-01 2.10E-05 2.05E-05 5.40E-01 Trichloroethylene, 1,1,2 -79-01-6 24-hour —2.10E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 Trichloroethylene, 1,1,2 -79-01-6 24-hour —2.10E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 24-hour 2.15E+00 7.34E-03 7.19E-03 2.16E+00 Vanadium 7440-62-2 24-hour 1.55E-03 4.96E-05 4.86E-05 1.60E-03 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 24-hour 5.88E-03 1.86E-03 1.82E-03 7.70E-03 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 24-hour 5.88E-03 1.86E-03 1.82E-03 7.70E-03 Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 24-hour 4.83E+00 2.57E-02 2.52E-02 4.86E+00 Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 10-minute 1.94E+01 2.57E-02 2.45E-01 1.96E+01 Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 24-hour 4.83E+00 2.57E-02 2.52E-02 4.86E+00 Zinc 7440-66-6 24-hour 4.00E-02 8.50E-03 8.33E-03 4.83E-02 https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 3 of 3 Made by: KSA Checked by: JMGolder AssociatesPage 180 REPORT Durham-York Energy Centre Covanta Durham York Renewable Energy L.P. Golder Associates Ltd. Page 181 Page 182 Version Date Revision Description Prepared By Page 183 Page 184 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 NOISE SOURCE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 4 4.0 POINT(S) OF RECEPTION ............................................................................................................................. 5 5.0 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA .............................................................................................................................. 6 6.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................................. 7 7.0 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................ 9 TABLES TABLES (Appended to Text) Page 185 FIGURES APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G Page 186 Page 187 ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CHECKLIST Required Information 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Facility Description 3.0 Noise Source Summary 4.0 Point of Reception Noise Impact Calculations 5.0 Acoustics Assessment Summary 6.0 Conclusions 7. 0 Appendices Recreated by Golder Associates Ltd., from Ontario Ministry of Environment Publication PIBS 5356e Page 188 1.0 INTRODUCTION Page 189 2.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION Page 190 On site vehicles Page 191 3.0 NOISE SOURCE SUMMARY 3.1 Insignificant Noise Sources 3.2 Predictable Worst Cast Operation Scenarios 3.2.1 Facility Normal Operations (Stationary Sources) 3.2.2 Scheduled Emergency Diesel Generator Testing 3.2.3 Scheduled Emergency Diesel Fire Pump Testing Page 192 4.0 POINT(S) OF RECEPTION Page 193 5.0 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 5.1 Stationary Sources Table 1: Stationary Sources Sound Level Limits for Class 2 Time Period Class 2 POW MECP Exclusionary Sound Level Limit (dBA) Class 2 Outdoor MECP Exclusionary Sound Level Limit (dBA) 5.2 Emergency Equipment The sound level limits for noise produced by emergency equipment operating in non-emergency situations, such as testing or maintenance of such equipment, are 5 dB greater than the sound level limits otherwise applicable to stationary sources. The noise produced by emergency equipment operating in non-emergency situations should be assessed independently of all other stationary sources of noise. Specifically, the emissions are not required to be included with the overall noise assessment of a stationary source facility Page 194 6.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT 6.1 Analysis Methodology 6.2 Results 6.2.1 Noise Impact Assessment – Facility Normal Operations (Stationary Sources) 6.2.2 Noise Impact Assessment – Back-up Diesel Generator Testing Page 195 6.2.3 Noise Impact Assessment –Emergency Fire Pump Testing Page 196 7.0 CONCLUSION Page 197 Golder Associates Ltd. Acoustic, Noise and Vibration Specialist Principal Page 198 TABLES Page 199 Table A1: Facility Source Summary Source ID Source Description Overall Daytime Sound Power Level (dBA) Overall Night- time Sound Power Level (dBA) Source Location Sound Characteristics Noise Control Measures NOISE SOURCE SUMMARY TABLE NOMENCLATURE Source Location Noise Control Measures Sound Characteristics Page 200 Table SS1: Point of Reception Predicted Partial Sound Levels - Normal Operations (Stationary Source) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) OLA003 Source ID POR001 OLA001 POR002 OLA002 POR003 Page 201 Table SS2: Acoustic Assessment Summary - Overall Sound Levels - Normal Operations (Stationary Source) POR ID POR Description Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Verified by Acoustic Audit Daytime Performance Limit (dBA) Night-time Performance Limit (dBA) Compliance with Performance Limit (Yes/No) Page 202 Table EG1: Point of Reception Predicted Partial Sound Levels - Emergency Generators Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) OLA003 Source ID POR001 OLA001 POR002 OLA002 POR003 Page 203 Table EG2: Acoustic Assessment Summary - Overall Sound Levels - Emergency Generators POR ID POR Description Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Verified by Acoustic Audit Daytime Performance Limit (dBA) Night-time Performance Limit (dBA) Compliance with Performance Limit (Yes/No) Page 204 Table FP11: Point of Reception Predicted Partial Sound Levels - Emergency Fire Pump 1 Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) OLA003 Source ID POR001 OLA001 POR002 OLA002 POR003 Page 205 Table FP12: Acoustic Assessment Summary - Overall Sound Levels - Emergency Fire Pump 1 POR ID POR Description Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Verified by Acoustic Audit Daytime Performance Limit (dBA) Night-time Performance Limit (dBA) Compliance with Performance Limit (Yes/No) Page 206 Table FP21: Point of Reception Predicted Partial Sound Levels - Emergency Fire Pump 2 Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Distance (m) Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) OLA003 Source ID POR001 OLA001 POR002 OLA002 POR003 Page 207 Table FP22: Acoustic Assessment Summary - Overall Sound Levels - Emergency Fire Pump 2 POR ID POR Description Overall Daytime Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Overall Night-time Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Verified by Acoustic Audit Daytime Performance Limit (dBA) Night-time Performance Limit (dBA) Compliance with Performance Limit (Yes/No) Page 208 FIGURES Page 209 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! ! !!!!!! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !ÃÄ401 Da r l i n g t o n C r e e k Ro b i n s o n C r e e k Tooley C reek Darlington Creek Lake Ontario(lac Ontario) Lake Ontario(lac Ontario) POR001 POR002 POR003 677500 677500 680000 680000 682500 6825004860000 486000048625004862500LEGEND ! ! KEY MAP SITE LOCATION REFERENCE(S) Page 210 S001 S002 S003 S004 S005 S006 S007 S008 S009S010 S011 S012 S013 S014 S015 S016 S017S018 S019 S020 S021 S022 S023 S024 S025 S026 S027 S028 S038S037S035S036 S050 S042 S044 S046 S045 S043 S048 S049 S055 S054 S052S051 S053 S047 S039 S040 S041 680400 680400 680600 680600 680800 6808004860200 48602004860400486040048606004860600LEGEND KEY MAP Site Layout REFERENCE(S) Page 211 APPENDIX A Page 212 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!C O U R T IC E R O A DBASELINE ROADH O L T R O A D T R U L L S R O A D ENERGY DRIVEH A N C O C K R O A D ÃÄ401Robi n s o n C r e e kTooley CreekDarlington CreekDarlingtonCreekLake Ontario(lac Ontario)6785006785006790006790006795006795006800006800006805006805006810006810006815006815006820006820006825006825004858500485850048590004859000485950048595004860000486000048605004860500486100048610004861500486150048620004862000LEGENDLOCAL ROADPRIMARY HIGHWAYRAILROAD!TRANSMISSION LINEWATERCOURSEAPPROXIMATE PROJECT BOUNDARYBuildingWATERBODYWETLANDWOODED AREAAgriculture Zone (A)Mixed Use (MU)Commercial Zone (C)Environmental Protection Zone (EP)Industrial Zone (M)Institutional Zone (P)Residential Zone (R)PATH: S:\Clients\Covanta_Durham_York_Renewable_Energy\Durham_York_Energy_Centre\99_PROJ\19117255\40_PROD\0002_NoiseModelling\19117255-0002-RA-0003.mxd PRINTED ON: 2020-02-06 AT: 12:45:25 PMIF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ANSI B25mm0KEY MAPCLIENTCOVANTA DURHAM YORK RENEWABLE ENERGY LPPROJECTNOISE MODELLING, CLARINGTON ONTARIOTITLEZoning PlanZONING DATA: ARCGIS MAP SERVICEHTTPS://GIS.CLARINGTON.NET/ARCGIS/SERVICESREFERENCE(S)19117255 00020A2020-02-06KARRDJSTGCONSULTANTPROJECT NO.CONTROLREV.FIGUREYYYY-MM-DDDESIGNEDPREPAREDREVIEWEDAPPROVED05001,0001:15,000METRESPage 213 å å åå å å å å å !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!( BASELINE ROAD RUNDLE ROADCOURTICE ROADHIGHWAY 401TOWNLINE ROADDURHAM HIGHWAY 2 TRULLS ROADBLOOR STREET NASH ROADVARCOE ROADCENTERFIELD DRIVETOOLEY ROADGEORGEREYNOLDS DRIVE ROBERT ADAMSDRIVEPRESTONVALE ROADRIDRIVENGHAMSANDDRIVEAVONDALEGLENABBEY DRIVE ROADFENNING DRIVEPRESTONVALEROADTRULLS ROADBASELINE ROAD ENERGY DRIVE PEBBLESTONE ROAD HIGHWAY 418SPECIALSTUDYAREA 1 SPECIAL POLICY AREA DSPECIALSTUDYAREA 1 C.N . R MEADOWGLADE AVENUE C.P.R CRAGO ROADHANCOCKk COURTICE ROADSOLINA RAODSPECIAL STUDY AREA 4 SOLINA ROADSPECIAL STUDY AREA 4 SPECIAL STUDY AREA 4 A107-17 A107-8 A107-5A107-6A107-7 CP CP MPMP GO ³ McLaughlinBay Lake Ontario ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !CP å !MP ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! GO A107 COURTICE URBAN AREALAND USE MAP A2Page 214 ! !!! ! !! !! ! !! ! !!! ! !!! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !! !! ! !! ! !!! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! !!! ! !! ! !! !! ! !!! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! !! ! ! !!!! ! !!! !!!! !!! ! !! !!! ! !! !! !! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! !!! ! !!! ! !! !! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! !! !! ! !!! ! !!! ! ! !!! ! !!!! !!!! ! !!! !!! !! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! !! !! ! !!! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! !! !! ! !! !! !! !! ! !!! ! !! !! !! !! ! !! !! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! !! !! ! !! !! !! !! ! !!! ! !! !! !! !! ! !! !! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! !!! ! !! !! ! !!! ! !! !! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! !! !! ! !!! ! !!! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! !!! ! !!! ! !! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! !! !! !! ! !!! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! !!!! ! !!! !!!! !! !!! ! !! !!! ! !!! ! !!!! ! !!! ! ! !!! ! !!! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! !! !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! k k ³LEGEND ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! k LAND USEAND PRIMARY ROADS MAP A Page 215 APPENDIX B Page 216 1 DESCRIPTION OF TECHNICAL TERMS Page 217 1 NOISE SOURCE SUMMARY TABLE NOMENCLATURE Source Location Sound Characteristics Noise Control Measures Page 218 APPENDIX C Page 219 Name ID 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 A lin Source Appendix C: Noise Data Oktave Spectrum (dB) Page 220 APPENDIX D Page 221 1 INSIGNIFICANT NOISE SOURCES Source Description Rational Page 222 APPENDIX E Page 223 Appendix E Weather Data Weather Data for November 29, 2019 from Environment Canada (http://weather.gc.ca/) Station Name OSHAWA Province ONTARIO Latitude 43.92 Longitude -78.88 Elevation 139.9 Climate Identifier 6155875 WMO Identifier 71697 TC Identifier YOO Time Temp (°C)Dew Point Temp (°C) Rel Hum (%) Wind Dir (10s deg) Wind Spd (km/h) Stn Press (kPa)Weather 0:00 -3.1 -5.9 81 33 11 101.32 NA 1:00 -3.2 -5.7 83 33 11 101.3 NA 2:00 -3.2 -5.7 83 33 9 101.35 NA 3:00 -3.4 -5.9 83 36 13 101.36 NA 4:00 -3.6 -5.8 85 35 11 101.3 NA 5:00 -3.5 -5.4 87 33 11 101.33 NA 6:00 -3.7 -5.6 87 2 5 101.34 NA 7:00 -3.8 -5.4 89 31 9 101.29 NA 8:00 -3.7 -5.2 90 34 13 101.28 NA 9:00 -3.8 -5.3 90 33 11 101.31 NA 10:00 -3.5 -5.4 87 35 8 101.34 NA 11:00 -3.3 -5.3 86 34 9 101.3 NA 12:00 -3 -5.3 84 35 8 101.2 NA 13:00 -2.7 -5.2 83 32 5 101.09 NA 14:00 -2.3 -5 82 32 11 101.06 NA 15:00 -2.3 -4.8 83 33 9 101.03 NA 16:00 -2.1 -4.8 82 34 11 100.98 NA 17:00 -2.2 -5 81 2 9 100.96 NA 18:00 -2.3 -5.3 80 1 8 100.95 NA 19:00 -2.3 -4.9 83 31 9 100.95 NA 20:00 -2.2 -4.7 83 33 4 100.9 NA 21:00 -2.2 -4.7 83 2 5 100.81 NA 22:00 -2.3 -5 82 0 100.79 NA 23:00 -3.3 -5.2 87 1 4 100.73 NA https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/6 Deliverables/Final/Noise/App E - Weather Data/Weather Data Golder AssociatesPage 224 APPENDIX F Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 APPENDIX G Page 228 Report (19117255 Covanta Noise Model 28Jun2021.cna ) CALCULATION CONFIGURATION Configuration Parameter Value General Country (user defined) Max. Error (dB)0.00 Max. Search Radius (#(Unit,LEN))2000.00 Min. Dist Src to Rcvr 0.00 Partition Raster Factor 0.50 Max. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))1000.00 Min. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))1.00 Min. Length of Section (%)0.00 Proj. Line Sources On Proj. Area Sources On Ref. Time Reference Time Day (min)60.00 Reference Time Night (min)60.00 Daytime Penalty (dB)0.00 Recr. Time Penalty (dB)0.00 Night-time Penalty (dB)0.00 DTM Standard Height (m)75.00 Model of Terrain Triangulation Reflection max. Order of Reflection 2 Search Radius Src 100.00 Search Radius Rcvr 100.00 Max. Distance Source - Rcvr 1000.00 1000.00 Min. Distance Rvcr - Reflector 1.00 1.00 Min. Distance Source - Reflector 0.10 Industrial (ISO 9613) Lateral Diffraction some Obj Obst. within Area Src do not shield On Screening Excl. Ground Att. over Barrier Dz with limit (20/25) Barrier Coefficients C1,2,3 3.0 20.0 0.0 Temperature (#(Unit,TEMP))10 rel. Humidity (%)70 Ground Absorption G 1.00 Wind Speed for Dir. (#(Unit,SPEED))3.0 Roads (RLS-90) Strictly acc. to RLS-90 Railways (Schall 03 (1990)) Strictly acc. to Schall 03 / Schall-Transrapid Aircraft (???) Strictly acc. to AzB Page 229 Receiver Name:Residential - two storey ID:POR002 X:681369.87 m Y:4860346.98 m Z:102.28 m Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Main stack exhaust'', ID: ''!00!S019'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 2 680538.12 4860346.15 188.60 0 DEN A 109.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.3 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Truck silo filling'', ID: ''!00!S017'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 5 680549.85 4860361.81 101.50 0 D A 113.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.6 13 680549.85 4860361.81 101.50 1 D A 113.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 32.6 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Truck silo filling'', ID: ''!00!S022'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 16 680539.30 4860305.14 101.50 0 D A 113.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.6 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.9 22 680539.30 4860305.14 101.50 1 D A 113.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.6 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 33.4 25 680539.30 4860305.14 101.50 1 D A 113.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 3.6 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 39.6 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''GSU Transformer'', ID: ''!00!S016'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 26 680602.96 4860425.33 102.50 0 DEN A 105.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.7 1.8 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.0 33 680602.96 4860425.33 102.50 1 DEN A 105.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 2.1 -1.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 2.4 23.6 35 680602.96 4860425.33 102.50 1 DEN A 105.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 2.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 2.2 27.2 36 680602.96 4860425.33 102.50 1 DEN A 105.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 1.9 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.3 10.3 39 680602.96 4860425.33 102.50 2 DEN A 105.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 2.0 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.7 7.0 40 680602.96 4860425.33 102.50 1 DEN A 105.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.9 1.8 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 32.8 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Truck silo filling'', ID: ''!00!S021'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 41 680515.28 4860338.21 101.50 0 D A 113.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 3.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 33.5 43 680515.28 4860338.21 101.50 1 D A 113.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 3.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 13.8 0.0 11.4 14.2 45 680515.28 4860338.21 101.50 1 D A 113.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 3.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.0 25.1 8.2 49 680515.28 4860338.21 101.50 2 D A 113.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 3.8 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 33.1 Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Air Cooled Condenser - Bottom'', ID: ''!00S039'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 50 680576.60 4860420.89 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.6 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.2 51 680568.66 4860427.18 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.8 52 680564.43 4860430.92 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 10.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.9 53 680565.99 4860432.35 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.7 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.6 54 680569.04 4860435.18 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 14.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 18.7 55 680576.35 4860421.79 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 16.0 56 680556.41 4860432.06 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 14.4 57 680559.44 4860432.35 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 10.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 17.0 58 680563.98 4860432.79 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 16.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.8 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 22.4 59 680567.11 4860432.48 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.8 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 19.6 61 680569.13 4860430.12 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 23.8 62 680570.98 4860427.97 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 12.2 63 680571.49 4860427.38 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 16.3 65 680573.69 4860424.83 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 15.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 21.9 66 680576.83 4860421.22 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 11.7 68 680568.48 4860434.85 110.00 2 DEN A 80.7 15.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 3.9 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 19.6 107 680568.49 4860430.79 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 19.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 3.9 -0.9 0.0 0.0 18.5 0.0 2.1 6.3 Page 230 Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Air Cooled Condenser - Bottom'', ID: ''!00S039'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 122 680573.67 4860424.81 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 3.9 -1.0 0.0 0.0 17.1 0.0 3.1 0.7 136 680559.46 4860426.92 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 137 680563.78 4860423.53 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 138 680566.32 4860421.51 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.2 139 680566.21 4860419.23 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.0 140 680563.01 4860416.25 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.7 149 680574.49 4860419.15 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 15.5 151 680568.64 4860418.58 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 16.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 23.2 152 680564.65 4860419.01 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 21.1 154 680563.56 4860420.22 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 11.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 18.1 155 680563.04 4860420.81 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 13.4 157 680561.38 4860422.67 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 16.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 23.3 158 680558.18 4860426.26 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 21.0 160 680555.78 4860428.96 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 13.6 161 680554.56 4860430.34 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 10.9 170 680560.47 4860423.74 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 18.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 3.9 -0.9 0.0 0.0 22.4 0.0 2.0 1.9 214 680577.52 4860419.46 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 -3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 3.9 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.4 225 680573.52 4860419.11 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 19.3 1133 680571.37 4860422.94 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 -5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 1135 680565.66 4860425.74 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 1136 680557.82 4860429.59 110.00 0 DEN A 80.7 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 1141 680571.51 4860422.87 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 -4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.3 1147 680564.78 4860426.18 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 -2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.3 1150 680560.02 4860428.51 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.7 1151 680556.85 4860430.07 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 -4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 1153 680554.73 4860431.11 110.00 1 DEN A 80.7 -2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.8 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 13'', ID: ''!00!S015'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 235 680546.71 4860404.32 120.00 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 1.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.9 239 680546.71 4860404.32 120.00 1 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 1.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 26.7 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 12'', ID: ''!00!S014'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 240 680543.46 4860414.06 120.00 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 1.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.8 241 680543.46 4860414.06 120.00 1 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 1.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 26.6 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Carbon silo dust collector'', ID: ''!00!S018'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 243 680546.07 4860364.79 105.48 0 DEN A 100.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 2.7 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.5 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 11'', ID: ''!00!S013'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 246 680540.90 4860421.63 120.00 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 1.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.7 247 680540.90 4860421.63 120.00 1 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 1.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 26.6 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 9'', ID: ''!00!S011'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 249 680534.32 4860377.68 133.60 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 1.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 7'', ID: ''!00!S009'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 250 680535.17 4860398.32 136.10 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 1.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 8'', ID: ''!00!S010'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 251 680530.66 4860388.50 135.60 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 1.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.5 Page 231 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 6'', ID: ''!00!S008'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 253 680526.98 4860423.85 136.10 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 1.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.4 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 4'', ID: ''!00!S006'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 255 680521.32 4860373.28 133.60 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 1.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.5 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 10'', ID: ''!00!S012'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 258 680520.08 4860403.42 136.10 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 1.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.3 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 3'', ID: ''!00!S005'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 261 680517.67 4860384.12 135.60 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 1.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.4 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 5'', ID: ''!00!S007'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 265 680516.55 4860413.61 136.10 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.3 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 2'', ID: ''!00!S004'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 267 680511.42 4860390.50 136.10 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.3 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Cement silo dust collector'', ID: ''!00!S020'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 271 680512.68 4860331.82 104.87 0 DEN A 100.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 2.8 -1.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 25.3 273 680512.68 4860331.82 104.87 2 DEN A 100.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.7 3.1 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 23.0 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Roof ventilation unit 1'', ID: ''!00!S003'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 276 680503.38 4860416.28 136.10 0 DEN A 100.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 24.6 vert. Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Turbine building louver'', ID: ''!00S055'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 279 680552.78 4860420.03 101.50 0 DEN A 89.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 6.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.2 282 680553.60 4860417.61 101.50 0 DEN A 89.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 6.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 567 680552.78 4860420.03 100.74 0 DEN A 89.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 6.5 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.9 572 680553.60 4860417.61 100.74 0 DEN A 89.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 6.5 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Closed cooling water cooler top'', ID: ''!00!S040'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 309 680576.42 4860406.52 104.10 0 DEN A 78.6 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 1.8 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.5 312 680577.83 4860399.03 104.10 0 DEN A 78.6 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 1.8 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.4 314 680577.98 4860394.72 104.10 0 DEN A 78.6 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 1.8 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.8 318 680576.94 4860393.99 104.10 0 DEN A 78.6 -5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 1.8 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 344 680578.43 4860395.81 104.10 2 DEN A 78.6 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.1 6.8 345 680577.95 4860394.70 104.10 2 DEN A 78.6 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.1 4.3 350 680578.81 4860395.13 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.9 -1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 10.5 352 680578.25 4860395.77 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.9 -1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 13.4 354 680577.98 4860397.28 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.9 -1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 14.7 360 680577.46 4860400.29 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.9 -1.6 0.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 2.1 5.1 361 680576.86 4860403.65 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.9 -1.5 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 2.1 2.9 363 680576.21 4860407.40 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.9 -1.4 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 2.1 0.4 375 680577.41 4860401.25 104.10 2 DEN A 78.6 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 392 680577.01 4860402.80 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 1.9 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 19.7 397 680577.45 4860401.02 104.10 2 DEN A 78.6 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 12.6 Page 232 Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Closed cooling water cooler top'', ID: ''!00!S040'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 400 680577.74 4860399.49 104.10 2 DEN A 78.6 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.1 2.2 404 680578.00 4860398.09 104.10 2 DEN A 78.6 7.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.1 7.4 405 680578.24 4860396.84 104.10 2 DEN A 78.6 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.1 3.6 411 680577.03 4860402.59 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 1.8 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 19.0 413 680575.96 4860408.78 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 1.8 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 9.9 417 680577.17 4860402.56 104.10 2 DEN A 78.6 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 12.0 434 680575.25 4860400.71 104.10 0 DEN A 78.6 11.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 1.8 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.4 445 680574.00 4860407.34 104.10 0 DEN A 78.6 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 1.8 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.9 450 680574.16 4860410.54 104.10 0 DEN A 78.6 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 1.8 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.2 458 680574.32 4860406.52 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.9 -1.4 0.0 0.0 12.4 0.0 2.1 5.2 460 680575.03 4860402.47 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.9 -1.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 2.1 2.7 462 680575.62 4860399.08 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.9 -1.6 0.0 0.0 11.6 0.0 2.1 1.0 464 680576.16 4860395.99 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.9 -1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 6.5 480 680573.83 4860409.33 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 1.9 -1.4 0.0 0.0 12.3 0.0 2.1 1.3 497 680572.45 4860410.12 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 8.9 499 680573.37 4860410.04 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 9.5 501 680573.80 4860409.53 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 12.2 502 680574.71 4860404.33 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 1.9 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 20.9 505 680575.70 4860398.31 104.10 2 DEN A 78.6 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 4.1 2.7 513 680575.15 4860401.28 104.10 2 DEN A 78.6 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 11.2 525 680572.98 4860409.96 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 1.8 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 13.4 527 680574.10 4860407.89 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 11.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 1.8 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 18.3 529 680575.07 4860402.33 104.10 1 DEN A 78.6 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 1.8 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 18.7 531 680574.83 4860402.93 104.10 2 DEN A 78.6 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 1.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 12.2 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Truck Idling'', ID: ''!00!S025'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 540 680556.91 4860469.75 102.40 0 DEN A 94.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 19.7 542 680556.91 4860469.75 102.40 1 DEN A 94.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 4.0 -1.2 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 2.7 10.1 543 680556.91 4860469.75 102.40 1 DEN A 94.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 4.1 -0.7 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 2.2 6.4 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Truck Idling'', ID: ''!00!S024'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 544 680540.04 4860474.58 102.40 0 DEN A 94.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.9 -1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 547 680540.04 4860474.58 102.40 1 DEN A 94.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 4.2 -0.6 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 2.1 8.4 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Conveyor'', ID: ''!00!S028'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 550 680527.04 4860333.94 106.50 0 D A 94.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 2.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 19.5 550 680527.04 4860333.94 106.50 0 N A 94.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 2.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 19.5 550 680527.04 4860333.94 106.50 0 E A 94.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 2.9 -1.3 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 19.5 552 680527.04 4860333.94 106.50 1 D A 94.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 2.9 -1.2 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 2.0 16.3 552 680527.04 4860333.94 106.50 1 N A 94.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 2.9 -1.2 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 2.0 16.3 552 680527.04 4860333.94 106.50 1 E A 94.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 2.9 -1.2 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 2.0 16.3 553 680527.04 4860333.94 106.50 2 D A 94.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.6 3.1 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 17.6 553 680527.04 4860333.94 106.50 2 N A 94.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.6 3.1 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 17.6 553 680527.04 4860333.94 106.50 2 E A 94.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.6 3.1 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 17.6 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Truck Idling'', ID: ''!00!S023'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 554 680522.19 4860472.27 102.40 0 DEN A 94.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 4.0 -1.3 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 18.5 555 680522.19 4860472.27 102.40 1 DEN A 94.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 4.1 -1.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 2.0 9.7 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Truck Idling'', ID: ''!00!S027'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 559 680454.28 4860307.87 101.51 0 DEN A 94.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 4.2 -0.8 0.0 0.0 17.3 0.0 0.0 3.5 561 680454.28 4860307.87 101.51 1 DEN A 94.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.4 4.3 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 17.1 Page 233 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Truck Idling'', ID: ''!00!S026'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 564 680444.44 4860338.30 102.35 0 DEN A 94.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.3 4.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 16.4 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Admin HVAC 2'', ID: ''!00!S002'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 588 680534.22 4860438.14 106.30 0 DEN A 93.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 2.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 17.4 595 680534.22 4860438.14 106.30 2 DEN A 93.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 2.1 -0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 14.6 597 680534.22 4860438.14 106.30 1 DEN A 93.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 2.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 2.0 3.6 Point Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Admin HVAC 1'', ID: ''!00!S001'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 598 680531.47 4860445.98 106.30 0 DEN A 93.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 2.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 17.1 601 680531.47 4860445.98 106.30 2 DEN A 93.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 2.1 -0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 14.6 603 680531.47 4860445.98 106.30 1 DEN A 93.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 2.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 2.0 15.2 Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Tipping Floor Roof Top opening'', ID: ''!00!S041'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 605 680493.37 4860466.37 115.10 0 DEN A 80.6 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 4.2 -0.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 11.5 610 680499.57 4860468.61 115.10 0 DEN A 80.6 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 4.1 -0.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 1.2 611 680500.80 4860469.05 115.10 0 DEN A 80.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 4.1 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 612 680503.27 4860469.72 115.10 0 DEN A 80.6 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 4.1 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4 790 680486.40 4860464.22 115.10 0 DEN A 80.6 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 4.2 -0.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 6.4 792 680492.12 4860466.47 115.10 0 DEN A 80.6 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 4.2 -0.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 8.5 934 680492.66 4860467.15 115.10 0 DEN A 80.6 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 4.2 -0.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 7.9 936 680496.01 4860468.34 115.10 0 DEN A 80.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 4.2 -0.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 3.0 940 680498.49 4860468.98 115.10 0 DEN A 80.6 -2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 4.2 -0.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 3088 680490.78 4860466.69 115.10 0 DEN A 80.6 -2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 4.2 -0.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 Line Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Loader 1'', ID: ''!00S037'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 621 680465.84 4860274.07 100.58 0 DEN A 73.1 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 3.5 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 623 680464.56 4860278.01 100.69 0 DEN A 73.1 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 3.5 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 626 680461.45 4860287.59 100.96 0 DEN A 73.1 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 3.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 1.5 653 680447.36 4860330.98 102.16 0 DEN A 73.1 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.3 3.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 658 680446.03 4860335.08 102.27 0 DEN A 73.1 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.3 3.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 665 680445.08 4860337.99 102.35 0 DEN A 73.1 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.3 3.6 -0.7 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.9 704 680455.38 4860306.27 101.47 1 DEN A 73.1 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.4 3.6 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 1.5 1550 680497.52 4860283.53 101.68 0 DEN A 73.1 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 2.7 1554 680491.97 4860281.51 101.46 0 DEN A 73.1 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 3.4 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.3 1750 680471.04 4860273.89 100.69 0 DEN A 73.1 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.5 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 1986 680443.87 4860341.73 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.3 3.6 -0.9 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 2.8 2579 680483.05 4860278.26 101.13 0 DEN A 73.1 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.5 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 2580 680480.82 4860277.45 101.03 0 DEN A 73.1 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.5 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 2944 680477.50 4860276.24 100.90 0 DEN A 73.1 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.5 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 2978 680488.00 4860280.06 101.31 0 DEN A 73.1 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 3.5 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 3063 680439.17 4860356.19 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.4 3.6 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 3155 680438.17 4860359.28 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.4 3.6 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3633 680440.49 4860352.12 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.4 3.6 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 3651 680485.65 4860279.21 101.23 0 DEN A 73.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.5 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 3670 680439.98 4860353.69 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.4 3.6 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 Line Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Loader 2'', ID: ''!00S038'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 800 680576.83 4860316.86 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.2 -1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 803 680575.05 4860321.96 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.2 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 806 680572.97 4860327.90 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.2 -1.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 812 680570.22 4860335.75 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.2 -0.9 0.0 0.0 11.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 819 680568.00 4860342.09 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.2 -0.9 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 825 680574.45 4860323.67 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.5 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 7.8 Page 234 Line Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Loader 2'', ID: ''!00S038'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 827 680572.61 4860328.92 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.5 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 1.9 828 680571.29 4860332.70 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.5 -0.7 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 2.5 0.7 830 680569.15 4860338.81 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.5 -0.7 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 2.5 0.1 832 680567.90 4860342.39 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.5 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.1 835 680572.85 4860328.25 102.40 2 DEN A 73.1 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 3.5 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 1.8 837 680571.74 4860331.42 102.40 2 DEN A 73.1 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 3.5 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.1 1200 680563.59 4860354.69 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.2 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 1208 680562.62 4860357.48 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.2 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 1214 680561.35 4860361.09 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.2 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.6 1218 680559.46 4860366.50 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.2 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 1221 680564.05 4860353.37 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 1.1 1222 680563.31 4860355.51 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 2.7 1223 680562.52 4860357.76 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 1.6 1224 680561.88 4860359.58 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.9 1595 680567.19 4860344.41 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.2 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 1601 680566.52 4860346.32 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.2 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 1610 680565.76 4860348.49 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.2 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 1615 680564.98 4860350.72 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.2 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 1643 680566.37 4860346.76 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.5 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 2.4 1702 680563.22 4860306.58 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.2 -1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.9 1708 680547.02 4860301.23 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.3 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 1715 680546.51 4860301.06 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 3.4 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 6.4 1761 680553.06 4860384.78 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.2 1782 680553.05 4860384.80 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.3 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 8.3 1799 680556.39 4860375.28 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 1802 680555.12 4860378.89 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 1804 680555.69 4860377.26 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.3 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.3 1806 680555.12 4860378.91 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.3 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.9 1817 680554.58 4860380.44 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.3 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.2 1965 680569.86 4860308.78 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.2 -1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.8 1974 680573.24 4860309.89 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.2 -1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 2028 680555.21 4860303.94 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.3 -1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 2133 680576.38 4860310.93 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.2 -1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 2193 680550.16 4860393.08 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.3 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 2236 680550.55 4860391.96 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.3 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.6 2238 680549.73 4860394.31 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.9 2246 680549.94 4860393.70 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.3 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 2.4 2585 680557.81 4860371.20 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.2 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 2946 680541.17 4860299.30 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.3 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 2951 680541.17 4860299.30 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 3.4 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.4 3090 680536.22 4860297.67 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.3 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 3095 680536.22 4860297.67 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.3 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.9 3160 680551.50 4860389.23 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 3163 680551.06 4860390.49 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 3180 680551.51 4860389.23 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.3 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.5 3224 680577.54 4860314.86 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.2 -1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 3263 680578.29 4860312.70 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.2 -1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 3346 680533.82 4860296.87 102.39 0 DEN A 73.1 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.3 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 3353 680533.82 4860296.87 102.39 1 DEN A 73.1 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.3 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.5 3383 680538.59 4860298.45 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.3 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 3390 680538.59 4860298.45 102.40 1 DEN A 73.1 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 3.3 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.2 3852 680551.63 4860302.75 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.3 -1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 3864 680556.98 4860373.58 102.40 0 DEN A 73.1 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Line Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''On-site truck traffic - truck exit'', ID: ''!00S036'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 875 680515.96 4860236.80 100.43 0 DEN A 71.2 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 3.7 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 881 680530.83 4860241.95 100.64 0 DEN A 71.2 11.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.7 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 887 680543.29 4860246.26 100.81 0 DEN A 71.2 11.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.6 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 999 680464.02 4860278.27 100.69 0 DEN A 71.2 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 3.9 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 1002 680465.90 4860272.14 100.52 0 DEN A 71.2 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 3.9 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 1014 680455.41 4860306.29 101.48 1 DEN A 71.2 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.4 4.0 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 1.0 Page 235 Line Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''On-site truck traffic - truck exit'', ID: ''!00S036'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 1026 680593.99 4860263.82 101.68 0 DEN A 71.2 11.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.8 3.5 -1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 1029 680603.47 4860267.13 101.87 0 DEN A 71.2 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.7 3.4 -1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 1031 680610.26 4860269.49 102.01 0 DEN A 71.2 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.7 3.4 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 1035 680578.51 4860218.65 100.41 0 DEN A 71.2 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.5 -2.4 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 7.1 1039 680563.58 4860218.46 100.32 0 DEN A 71.2 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.6 -2.3 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 10.0 1243 680520.06 4860217.92 99.85 0 DEN A 71.2 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 3.7 -2.5 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 11.7 1283 680461.83 4860221.69 98.97 0 DEN A 71.2 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 3.9 -0.9 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 2.0 1287 680446.20 4860226.07 98.61 0 DEN A 71.2 12.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.4 4.0 -1.7 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 6.8 1348 680602.66 4860218.94 100.55 0 DEN A 71.2 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.8 3.5 -1.8 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 10.1 1421 680494.77 4860217.61 99.61 0 DEN A 71.2 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 3.8 -2.5 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.0 9.3 1422 680482.04 4860217.46 99.33 0 DEN A 71.2 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.9 -2.5 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 7.4 1483 680621.26 4860223.35 100.86 0 DEN A 71.2 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -1.3 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 9.2 1506 680634.30 4860233.65 101.28 0 DEN A 71.2 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -1.1 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 9.0 1537 680572.27 4860256.29 101.39 0 DEN A 71.2 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.5 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.9 1586 680639.64 4860250.13 101.79 0 DEN A 71.2 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 1589 680639.57 4860246.78 101.69 0 DEN A 71.2 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 1590 680639.48 4860242.47 101.58 0 DEN A 71.2 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 5.5 1718 680470.21 4860258.67 100.20 0 DEN A 71.2 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.9 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 1720 680471.26 4860255.43 100.14 0 DEN A 71.2 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.9 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1722 680471.92 4860253.42 100.11 0 DEN A 71.2 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.9 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1725 680473.40 4860248.86 100.04 0 DEN A 71.2 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.9 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 1729 680471.48 4860254.78 100.13 1 DEN A 71.2 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 3.9 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 2.6 1733 680619.38 4860270.73 102.14 0 DEN A 71.2 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 1852 680543.37 4860218.21 100.05 0 DEN A 71.2 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.7 -2.2 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 7.6 1984 680633.55 4860264.48 102.12 0 DEN A 71.2 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 1985 680636.40 4860261.06 102.05 0 DEN A 71.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 2002 680637.68 4860258.40 101.99 0 DEN A 71.2 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 2005 680638.57 4860255.44 101.92 0 DEN A 71.2 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 2006 680639.30 4860253.01 101.86 0 DEN A 71.2 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 2020 680420.97 4860233.15 98.21 0 DEN A 71.2 11.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.6 4.1 -1.1 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 4.6 2034 680625.22 4860270.42 102.19 0 DEN A 71.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 2036 680626.78 4860269.56 102.19 0 DEN A 71.2 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 2038 680629.66 4860267.98 102.17 0 DEN A 71.2 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 2130 680558.23 4860251.43 101.10 0 DEN A 71.2 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.6 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 2247 680482.14 4860237.96 99.94 0 DEN A 71.2 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.9 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 2248 680484.94 4860236.22 99.95 0 DEN A 71.2 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.8 -1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 2249 680487.92 4860234.36 99.96 0 DEN A 71.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.8 -1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 2572 680499.71 4860232.50 100.16 0 DEN A 71.2 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 3.8 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 2574 680583.72 4860260.26 101.53 0 DEN A 71.2 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.5 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 2636 680492.36 4860233.10 100.02 0 DEN A 71.2 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 3.8 -1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 2926 680551.83 4860249.22 100.94 0 DEN A 71.2 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.6 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 2982 680587.68 4860218.76 100.43 0 DEN A 71.2 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.5 -2.2 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 3.6 3188 680551.49 4860218.31 100.22 0 DEN A 71.2 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.6 -2.2 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.0 3261 680475.39 4860244.31 99.98 0 DEN A 71.2 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.9 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 3262 680476.86 4860242.75 99.98 0 DEN A 71.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.9 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3393 680438.38 4860356.34 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.4 4.0 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 3426 680535.88 4860218.12 99.91 0 DEN A 71.2 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.7 -2.3 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 1.5 3428 680563.42 4860253.23 101.25 0 DEN A 71.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.6 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 3556 680504.85 4860232.96 100.28 0 DEN A 71.2 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 3.8 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 3577 680584.43 4860218.72 100.44 0 DEN A 71.2 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.5 -2.3 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3582 680467.61 4860266.64 100.36 0 DEN A 71.2 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.9 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 3656 680480.49 4860239.06 99.95 0 DEN A 71.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.9 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 3660 680503.56 4860217.72 99.80 0 DEN A 71.2 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 3.8 -2.5 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 3702 680468.29 4860264.57 100.32 0 DEN A 71.2 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.9 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 3725 680479.12 4860240.28 99.97 0 DEN A 71.2 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.9 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 3801 680506.76 4860233.62 100.31 0 DEN A 71.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 3.8 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 vert. Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Tipping floor bay door - entrance'', ID: ''!00S042'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 949 680507.43 4860468.68 104.00 0 DEN A 80.6 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 4.1 -1.1 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 7.8 951 680508.21 4860466.35 104.00 0 DEN A 80.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 4.1 -1.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 954 680507.43 4860468.68 105.00 0 DEN A 80.6 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 4.1 -1.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 7.9 Page 236 vert. Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Tipping floor bay door - entrance'', ID: ''!00S042'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 955 680508.21 4860466.35 105.00 0 DEN A 80.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 4.1 -0.9 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 5.8 959 680507.43 4860468.68 102.00 0 DEN A 80.6 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 4.1 -0.8 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 0.0 3.6 960 680508.21 4860466.35 102.00 0 DEN A 80.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 4.1 -0.8 0.0 0.0 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 969 680507.43 4860468.68 101.00 0 DEN A 80.6 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 4.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 0.0 1.9 979 680507.43 4860468.68 103.00 0 DEN A 80.6 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 4.1 -1.2 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 7.5 981 680508.21 4860466.35 103.00 0 DEN A 80.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 4.1 -1.1 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 5.1 1509 680507.43 4860468.68 100.25 0 DEN A 80.6 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.8 4.1 -2.2 0.0 0.0 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 Line Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''On-site truck traffic - truck entrance'', ID: ''!00S035'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 1022 680567.97 4860214.23 100.23 0 DEN A 71.2 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.6 -2.6 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 12.1 1054 680629.58 4860296.97 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 1057 680625.64 4860308.31 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 1276 680442.73 4860224.91 98.47 0 DEN A 71.2 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.4 4.0 -1.7 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 5.8 1278 680455.44 4860221.57 98.77 0 DEN A 71.2 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.3 4.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 1279 680463.83 4860219.37 98.97 0 DEN A 71.2 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 3.9 -1.2 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 2.0 1338 680642.33 4860239.36 101.52 0 DEN A 71.2 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1340 680642.18 4860242.86 101.61 0 DEN A 71.2 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 5.5 1342 680642.01 4860247.06 101.73 0 DEN A 71.2 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 1343 680641.81 4860251.65 101.85 0 DEN A 71.2 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 1344 680641.64 4860255.83 101.96 0 DEN A 71.2 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 1345 680641.56 4860257.82 102.02 0 DEN A 71.2 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 1347 680518.67 4860213.73 99.71 0 DEN A 71.2 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 3.7 -2.6 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 11.1 1383 680602.85 4860215.37 100.45 0 DEN A 71.2 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.8 3.5 -1.7 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 10.0 1386 680622.21 4860220.20 100.78 0 DEN A 71.2 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -1.2 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 9.5 1423 680632.57 4860226.51 101.07 0 DEN A 71.2 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -1.1 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 3.3 1424 680638.22 4860233.38 101.31 0 DEN A 71.2 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -1.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 8.0 1426 680530.12 4860474.62 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 3.7 -1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 1427 680523.29 4860472.46 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 10.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 3.7 -1.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 6.4 1429 680512.80 4860469.14 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 3.8 -0.8 0.0 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 1440 680594.43 4860398.16 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.8 3.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 1445 680591.26 4860407.30 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 9.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.9 3.5 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 1457 680591.05 4860407.89 102.40 1 DEN A 71.2 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.1 3.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 5.0 1480 680593.24 4860401.59 102.40 2 DEN A 71.2 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.6 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 2.7 1484 680557.44 4860469.63 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.3 3.6 -1.1 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 3.0 1485 680547.55 4860472.46 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.6 -1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 1513 680491.54 4860214.55 99.45 0 DEN A 71.2 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 3.8 -2.6 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 10.2 1651 680615.42 4860337.74 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 1660 680613.59 4860343.02 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 1837 680564.45 4860466.05 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.6 -0.8 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 3.9 1981 680641.15 4860260.57 102.09 0 DEN A 71.2 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 1982 680640.31 4860264.99 102.20 0 DEN A 71.2 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 1995 680538.73 4860213.27 99.84 0 DEN A 71.2 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.7 -2.6 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 3.5 1999 680544.35 4860213.45 99.97 0 DEN A 71.2 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.7 -2.6 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 5.1 2059 680418.47 4860231.29 98.09 0 DEN A 71.2 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.6 4.1 -1.3 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 3.1 2063 680584.60 4860426.45 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.9 3.5 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 2066 680583.23 4860430.40 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.5 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 2104 680585.24 4860424.61 102.40 1 DEN A 71.2 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.5 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.1 2106 680584.09 4860427.92 102.40 1 DEN A 71.2 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.5 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.8 2125 680473.74 4860216.76 99.13 0 DEN A 71.2 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.1 3.9 -2.5 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 2.7 2250 680639.38 4860268.77 102.30 0 DEN A 71.2 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 2251 680638.67 4860270.80 102.34 0 DEN A 71.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2252 680638.14 4860272.32 102.38 0 DEN A 71.2 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 2288 680599.30 4860384.14 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.7 3.4 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 2291 680598.38 4860386.79 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.8 3.4 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 2335 680587.50 4860418.10 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.9 3.5 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 2338 680586.40 4860421.28 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.9 3.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 2347 680587.48 4860418.18 102.40 1 DEN A 71.2 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.1 2374 680587.88 4860417.00 102.40 1 DEN A 71.2 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.5 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 1.6 2375 680586.78 4860420.18 102.40 1 DEN A 71.2 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.5 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 3.0 2482 680605.86 4860365.26 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.7 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 2490 680604.85 4860368.17 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.7 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Page 237 Line Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''On-site truck traffic - truck entrance'', ID: ''!00S035'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 2517 680602.88 4860373.84 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.7 3.4 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 2523 680601.88 4860376.71 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.7 3.4 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 2609 680580.36 4860438.65 102.40 1 DEN A 71.2 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 3.7 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.3 2637 680633.09 4860286.86 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 2645 680607.61 4860360.20 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 2715 680597.01 4860390.72 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.8 3.4 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 2884 680617.26 4860332.43 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 2897 680536.89 4860475.01 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.7 -1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.3 2934 680634.54 4860282.68 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 2963 680619.36 4860326.40 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 2968 680618.68 4860328.35 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 2984 680410.60 4860233.36 98.01 0 DEN A 71.2 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.7 4.1 -1.2 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 2986 680609.41 4860355.05 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 2990 680608.77 4860356.88 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 3023 680588.06 4860214.88 100.33 0 DEN A 71.2 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.5 -2.1 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 3.3 3026 680612.26 4860346.83 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 3046 680611.71 4860348.41 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 3070 680600.61 4860380.36 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.7 3.4 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 3104 680549.89 4860213.63 100.08 0 DEN A 71.2 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.6 -2.6 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 3.5 3113 680578.09 4860445.20 102.40 1 DEN A 71.2 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 3.7 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.2 3116 680578.09 4860445.20 102.40 2 DEN A 71.2 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 3.7 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.2 3151 680621.18 4860321.15 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 3221 680428.21 4860228.73 98.20 0 DEN A 71.2 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.5 4.0 -1.4 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 3231 680610.82 4860350.98 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 3236 680610.27 4860352.55 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 3251 680576.11 4860450.89 102.40 1 DEN A 71.2 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 3.7 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.0 3268 680603.95 4860370.74 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.7 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 3289 680635.72 4860279.31 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 3.3 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 3294 680637.40 4860274.46 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 3392 680636.55 4860276.91 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 3.3 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 3398 680588.79 4860414.40 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.9 3.5 -0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 3411 680588.79 4860414.41 102.40 1 DEN A 71.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.2 3.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.1 3423 680588.79 4860414.41 102.40 1 DEN A 71.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.5 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 1.3 3430 680620.06 4860324.39 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 3464 680532.67 4860475.17 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 3.7 -1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 3471 680533.40 4860213.28 99.75 0 DEN A 71.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 3.7 -2.6 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 3491 680623.43 4860314.66 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 3537 680622.58 4860317.11 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 3569 680591.29 4860214.99 100.33 0 DEN A 71.2 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.9 3.5 -2.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 3572 680584.84 4860214.78 100.34 0 DEN A 71.2 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 3.5 -2.2 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 3608 680585.84 4860422.88 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.9 3.5 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3635 680622.03 4860318.71 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 3665 680624.15 4860312.61 102.40 0 DEN A 71.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 3.4 -0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 vert. Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''Residue building bay door 2'', ID: ''!00S046'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 1288 680532.02 4860295.00 102.92 0 DEN A 78.6 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 6.6 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 1293 680532.02 4860295.00 101.92 0 DEN A 78.6 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 6.6 -0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 1307 680532.02 4860295.00 104.92 0 DEN A 78.6 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 6.6 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 1317 680532.02 4860295.00 103.92 0 DEN A 78.6 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 6.6 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 1329 680532.02 4860295.00 100.92 0 DEN A 78.6 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 1738 680532.02 4860295.00 100.17 0 DEN A 78.6 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 6.6 -2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.9 vert. Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''APC Building Louver 6'', ID: ''!00S054'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 2657 680543.26 4860372.82 115.60 0 DEN A 73.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 2663 680543.26 4860372.82 114.60 0 DEN A 73.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 2670 680543.26 4860372.82 113.60 0 DEN A 73.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 3810 680543.26 4860372.82 113.00 0 DEN A 73.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 Page 238 vert. Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''APC Building Louver 5'', ID: ''!00S053'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 2676 680541.16 4860379.00 113.60 0 DEN A 73.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 2686 680541.16 4860379.00 114.60 0 DEN A 73.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 2705 680541.16 4860379.00 115.60 0 DEN A 73.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 3819 680541.16 4860379.00 113.00 0 DEN A 73.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 vert. Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''APC Building Louver 4'', ID: ''!00S052'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 2768 680538.78 4860386.10 113.60 0 DEN A 73.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2771 680539.42 4860384.20 113.60 0 DEN A 73.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 2785 680538.78 4860386.10 115.60 0 DEN A 73.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 2787 680539.42 4860384.20 115.60 0 DEN A 73.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 2792 680538.78 4860386.10 114.60 0 DEN A 73.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 2794 680539.42 4860384.20 114.60 0 DEN A 73.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 vert. Area Source, ISO 9613, Name: ''APC Building Louver 3'', ID: ''!00S051'' Nr.X Y Z Refl.DEN Freq.Lw l/a Optime K0 Di Adiv Aatm Agr Afol Ahous Abar Cmet RL Lr (m)(m)(m)(Hz)dB(A)dB dB (dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)(dB)dB(A) 2812 680536.96 4860391.43 114.60 0 DEN A 73.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 2814 680537.47 4860389.93 114.60 0 DEN A 73.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 2816 680537.87 4860388.73 114.60 0 DEN A 73.0 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 2818 680537.37 4860390.23 114.60 1 DEN A 73.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.1 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 5.4 2825 680536.96 4860391.43 115.60 0 DEN A 73.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 2826 680537.47 4860389.93 115.60 0 DEN A 73.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 2827 680537.87 4860388.73 115.60 0 DEN A 73.0 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 2828 680537.37 4860390.23 115.60 1 DEN A 73.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.1 -0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 5.3 2833 680536.96 4860391.43 113.60 0 DEN A 73.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 2834 680537.47 4860389.93 113.60 0 DEN A 73.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 2835 680537.87 4860388.73 113.60 0 DEN A 73.0 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.4 3.0 -1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 2836 680537.37 4860390.23 113.60 1 DEN A 73.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.5 3.1 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 5.4 Page 239 golder.com Page 240 Durham York Energy Centre Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Scenario 1A Scenario 1B Scenario 2A Scenario 2B Page 245 Page 246 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 BACKGROUND AIR QUALITY ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 EMISSION SOURCES .................................................................................................................................. 16 4.0 MODELLING SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 20 Page 247 5.0 DISPERSION MODELLING .......................................................................................................................... 24 6.0 DISPERSION MODELLING RESULTS ........................................................................................................ 36 7.0 COMPARISON OF MODELLED SCENARIOS ............................................................................................ 48 8.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 50 9.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................. 51 Page 248 TABLES FIGURES Page 249 APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H Page 250 Page 251 É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É É !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lake Ontario ³LEGEND REV. 0.0 DESIGN SITE LOCATION PLAN FIGURE: 1 PROJECT NO. 19117255 SCALE AS SHOWN PROJECT TITLE GIS REVIEW PRM 25 Aug. 2010 CHECK DURHAM YORK ENERGY CENTRE AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT SO 8 Jan. 2020 KA AC 8 Jan. 2020 8 Jan. 2020 REFERENCE ! É É É É " Page 252 Page 253 Ontario’s Ambient Air Quality Criteria Desirable Acceptable Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 Canadians living in heavily populated and industrialized areas of the country may be exposed to potentially harmful levels of outdoor air pollutants, at concentrations that exceeded established standards.. Achievement of the CAAQS means that the measured air pollutant concentration in an air zone does not exceed the CAAQS numerical value. Page 254 Air Contaminants Benchmark (ACB) List de minimus Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 3.1.1.1 Source Testing 3.1.1.2 In-Stack Emission Limits Page 267 3.1.1.3 Emission Factors Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 4.1.1.1 Kinematic Effects of Terrain 4.1.1.2 Blocking Effects 4.1.2.1 Overland Boundary Layer Model 4.1.2.2 Overwater Boundary Layer Model Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 5.2.2.1 Land Use 5.2.2.2 Terrain 5.2.2.3 Roughness Length 5.2.2.4 Albedo 5.2.2.5 Bowen Ratio 5.2.2.6 Soil Heat Flux 5.2.2.7 Leaf Area Index Page 276 Page 277 Page 279 Page 281 EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E EEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lake Ontario ³LEGEND REV. 0.0 DESIGN DISPERSION MODELLING GRIDDED RECEPTORS FIGURE: 6 PROJECT NO. 19117255 SCALE AS SHOWN PROJECT TITLE GIS REVIEW PRM 25 Aug. 2010 CHECK DURHAM YORK ENERGY CENTRE AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT PRM 1 Feb. 2011 KA AC 1 Feb. 2011 1 Feb. 2011 REFERENCE ! E " Page 282 !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( Lake Ontario ³LEGEND REV. 0.0 DESIGN DISPERSION MODELLING SENSITIVE RECEPTORS FIGURE: 7 PROJECT NO. 19117255 SCALE AS SHOWN PROJECT TITLE GIS REVIEW PRM 25 Aug. 2010 CHECK DURHAM YORK ENERGY CENTRE AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT SO 8 Jan. 2020 KA AC 8 Jan. 2020 8 Jan. 2020 REFERENCE !( " Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Canadian National Ambient Air Quality Objectives: Process and Status Canada-Wide Standards for Particulate Matter and Ozone, 2012 Final Report. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc A Review of Techniques Available for Estimation of Short-Term NO2 Concentrations. J. Clim. and Appl. Meteor J. Energy Page 301 Air Pollution - Local Air Quality - Ontario Digital Elevation Model Data Page 302 Air Quality Specialist Principal Page 303 Page 304 Indicator Compound CAS No. Limiting Effect Averaging Period Ontario AAQC [µg/m³] National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Objectives(c) (µg/m3) CAAQS [µg/m³] Ontario Regulation 419/05 Project Criteria [µg/m³] Desirable Acceptable MECP POI Limit [µg/m³] Schedule Source Benchmark Page 305 Indicator Compound CAS No. Limiting Effect Averaging Period Ontario AAQC [µg/m³] National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Objectives(c) (µg/m3) CAAQS [µg/m³] Ontario Regulation 419/05 Project Criteria [µg/m³] Desirable Acceptable MECP POI Limit [µg/m³] Schedule Source Benchmark Page 306 Indicator Compound CAS No. Limiting Effect Averaging Period Ontario AAQC [µg/m³] National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Objectives(c) (µg/m3) CAAQS [µg/m³] Ontario Regulation 419/05 Project Criteria [µg/m³] Desirable Acceptable MECP POI Limit [µg/m³] Schedule Source Benchmark Page 307 Indicator Compound CAS No. Limiting Effect Averaging Period Ontario AAQC [µg/m³] National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Objectives(c) (µg/m3) CAAQS [µg/m³] Ontario Regulation 419/05 Project Criteria [µg/m³] Desirable Acceptable MECP POI Limit [µg/m³] Schedule Source Benchmark Page 308 Page 309 METEOROLOGICAL STATION CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Installed Equipment Windhead Check Calibrator: Wind Direction (deg from) Wind Speed (m/s) Error Allowance for WS component (+/- 0.72 km/h + 5% of Reference Value)_____ Temperature Check Page 310 Barometric Pressure Check Relative Humidity Check Precipitation Check Page 311 Client:Date: Station ID: Operator: Installed Equipment Windhead Check  Temperature Check  Meteorological Station Calibration Data Sheet Parameter Model Wind Direction (deg from)Wind Speed (m/s) Page 312 Barometric Pressure Check Relative Humidity Check  Precipitation Check    Page 313 Client:Date: Station ID: Operator: Installed Equipment Windhead Check Temperature Check  Meteorological Station Calibration Data Sheet Parameter Model Wind Direction (deg from)Wind Speed (m/s) Page 314 Barometric Pressure Check Relative Humidity Check  Precipitation Check    Page 315 Prepared for: Prepared by: Page 316 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Monitoring Objectives ....................................................................................1-1 1.2 Monitoring Period ...........................................................................................1-1 1.3 Project Description .........................................................................................1-2 1.4 EFW Site Characteristics ................................................................................1-2 1.5 Report Contents ..............................................................................................1-3 2 SUMMARY OF DISPERSION MODELLING PREDICTIONS .......................................2-1 2.1 Meteorological Modelling ...............................................................................2-1 2.2 Dispersion Modelling ......................................................................................2-2 3 GENERAL SITING CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................................3-1 3.1 Scale of Representativeness ..........................................................................3-1 3.2 Siting Requirements .......................................................................................3-2 3.3 Number of Monitors ........................................................................................3-3 4 CONTAMINANTS AND LOCATIONS FOR MONITORING ..........................................4-1 4.1 Contaminants to be Monitored ......................................................................4-1 4.2 Contaminants not Monitored .........................................................................4-2 4.3 Monitoring Locations......................................................................................4-4 5 INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA ACQUSITION ........................................................5-1 5.1 Continuous Ambient Monitors .......................................................................5-1 5.2 Non-Continuous Ambient Monitors ...............................................................5-2 5.3 Data Acquisition System ................................................................................5-4 Page 317 5.4 Meteorological Tower .....................................................................................5-5 5.5 Equipment Enclosure and Sampling Manifold ..............................................5-5 6 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ...........................................................6-1 7 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES ....................................................................7-1 7.1 Operator Requirements ..................................................................................7-1 7.2 Instrumentation Calibration ...........................................................................7-1 7.3 Accuracy Checks of Analysis Techniques ....................................................7-1 7.4 Sample Collection and Transportation ..........................................................7-1 7.5 Data Review and Validation............................................................................7-2 8 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................8-1 9 DATA REVIEW AND TRIGGERS FOR PROGRAM ALTERATION .............................9-1 9.1 Data Review and Corrective Actions .............................................................9-1 9.2 Monitoring Program Review...........................................................................9-2 10 CLOSURE .................................................................................................................. 10-1 11 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 11-1 LIST OF TABLES Page 318 LIST OF FIGURES Page 319 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Monitoring Objectives 1.2 Monitoring Period Page 320 1.3 Project Description         1.4 EFW Site Characteristics Page 321 1.5 Report Contents             Page 322 Figure 1-1 Proposed 140,000 tonnes/yr Facility Site Plan Page 323 Hwy 401 Baseline RdCour t ice Rd S Serv RdTru l ls Rd Bloor St Solina RdHancock RdRundle RdOsbourne Rd Darlington P k R d Down Rd Cigas Rd Courtice CrtMar ine D rTru l ls RdSolina Rd Hwy 401 Cigas Rd Lake Ontario McLaughlin Bay CLARINGTON Location of EFW Facilityand Surrounding Area Notes Legend Page 324 Hwy 401 Baseline RdCour t ice Rd S Serv RdTru l ls Rd Bloor St Solina RdHancock RdRundle Rd Osbourne R d Darlington P k R d Down Rd Cigas RdTru l ls RdSolina Rd Hwy 401 Cigas Rd Lake Ontario McLaughlin Bay CLARINGTON Locations of Sensitive Receptors Notes Legend Receptor Category Page 325 2 SUMMARY OF DISPERSION MODELLING PREDICTIONS 2.1 Meteorological Modelling Page 326 2.2 Dispersion Modelling Page 327 Page 328 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING PLAN FIGURE 2-2 Plot of Maximum Predicted Hourly-Average Ground Level Concentrations for Normalized Facility-Wide Emission Rate Scenario 1A (MCR, 140,000 tonnes/yr Facility) Predicted Statistical Maximum GLC = 8.78 (µg/m3)/(g/s) Page 329 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING PLAN FIGURE 2-3 Plot of Maximum Predicted 24-Hour-Average Ground Level Concentrations for Normalized Facility-Wide Emission Rate Scenario 1A (MCR, 140,000 tonnes/yr Facility) Predicted Statistical Maximum GLC = 1.21 (µg/m3)/(g/s) Page 330 FIGURE 2-4 Plot of Maximum Predicted Annual-Average Ground Level Concentrations for Normalized Facility-Wide Emission Rate Scenario 1A (MCR, 140,000 tonnes/yr Facility) Predicted Statistical Maximum GLC = 0.035 (µg/m3)/(g/s) Page 331 Hwy 401 Baseline RdCour t ice Rd S Serv RdTru l ls Rd Bloor St Solina RdHancock RdRundle Rd Osbourne R d Darlington P k R d Down Rd Cigas Rd Courtice CrtTru l ls RdSolina Rd Hwy 401 Cigas Rd Lake Ontario McLaughlin Bay CLARINGTON Plot of Total Annual ParticulateDry Deposition for a NormalizedFacility-Wide Emission Rate Notes Legend Deposition Particulates Page 332 Hwy 401 Baseline RdCour t ice Rd S Serv RdTru l ls Rd Bloor St Solina RdHancock RdRundle Rd Osbourne R d Darlington P k R d Down Rd Cigas Rd Courtice CrtTru l ls RdSolina Rd Hwy 401 Cigas Rd Lake Ontario McLaughlin Bay CLARINGTON Plot of Total Annual GaseousDry Deposition for a NormalizedFacility-Wide Emission Rate Notes Legend Deposition Vapour Page 333 3 GENERAL SITING CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 Scale of Representativeness     Page 334 3.2 Siting Requirements Page 335 3.3 Number of Monitors Page 336 Page 337 4 CONTAMINANTS AND LOCATIONS FOR MONITORING 4.1 Contaminants to be Monitored Page 338          4.2 Contaminants not Monitored     Page 339 Page 340 4.3 Monitoring Locations         Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 #0 #0 #0 #0 UpwindU-1 Property Line Downwind #2D-2 Downwind #1D-1 Hwy 401 Baseline RdCour t ice Rd S Serv RdTru l ls Rd Bloor St Sol ina RdHancock RdRundle RdOsbourne Rd Darlington P k R d Down Rd Cigas Rd Courtice CrtMar ine D rTru l ls RdSol ina Rd Hwy 401 Cigas Rd Lake Ontario McLaughlin Bay CLARINGTON Location of Proposed Monitoring Locations Notes Legend #0 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 5 INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA ACQUSITION 5.1 Continuous Ambient Monitors 5.1.1 Respirable Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 5.1.2 Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) Page 350 5.1.3 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) 5.2 Non-Continuous Ambient Monitors 5.2.1 Metals in Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Page 351             5.2.2 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Dioxins and Furans Page 352                5.3 Data Acquisition System Page 353 5.4 Meteorological Tower      5.5 Equipment Enclosure and Sampling Manifold Page 354 6 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 7 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES 7.1 Operator Requirements     7.2 Instrumentation Calibration 7.3 Accuracy Checks of Analysis Techniques 7.4 Sample Collection and Transportation Page 359          7.5 Data Review and Validation Page 360 8 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS              Page 361   o o o o o o   Page 362 9 DATA REVIEW AND TRIGGERS FOR PROGRAM ALTERATION 9.1 Data Review and Corrective Actions Page 363 9.2 Monitoring Program Review 9.2.1 9.2.2 Environmental Assessment Model Validation Page 364 9.2.3 Revisions to the Ambient Monitoring Plan Page 365 10 CLOSURE STANTEC CONSULTING LTD. Original Signed by G. Crooks Page 366 11 REFERENCES Page 367 Ministry of the Environment Ministère de l’Environnement RE: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Plan Locations 1 Page 368 Page 369 Table C1: Summary of Courtice and Rundle Continuous Monitoring Data (2015-2019) Indicator Compound Averaging Period Courtice [µg/m³] Rundle [µg/m³] Page 370 Table C2: Summary of Courtice and Rundle Non-Continuous Monitoring Data for SPM and Metals (2016-2019) Indicator Compound Averaging Period Courtice [µg/m³] Rundle [µg/m³] 25.91 30.94 42.93 146.41 35.57 41.38 65.16 203.61 26.00 ——26.91 35.60 ——52.99 0.12 0.14 0.21 1.00 0.22 0.24 0.42 1.42 0.13 ——0.15 0.19 ——0.30 0.0025 0.0034 0.0035 0.0071 0.0023 0.0033 0.0035 0.0264 0.0024 ——0.0033 0.0025 ——0.0033 0.0017 0.0020 0.0021 0.0043 0.0016 0.0020 0.0021 0.0206 0.0017 ——0.0020 0.0017 ——0.0020 0.0080 0.0099 0.0145 0.0339 0.0085 0.0107 0.0150 0.0267 0.0080 ——0.0092 0.0085 ——0.0091 0.0003 0.0003 0.0004 0.0016 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0018 0.0002 ——0.0003 0.0002 ——0.0003 0.0054 0.0123 0.0127 0.0139 0.0068 0.0123 0.0127 0.0133 0.0058 ——0.0127 0.0060 ——0.0126 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0019 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0047 0.0007 ——0.0007 0.0007 ——0.0007 0.0029 0.0038 0.0054 0.0225 0.0033 0.0041 0.0057 0.0175 Page 371 Indicator Compound Averaging Period Courtice [µg/m³] Rundle [µg/m³] 0.0030 ——0.0046 0.0031 ——0.0041 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0014 0.0007 0.0007 0.0007 0.0028 0.0007 ——0.0007 0.0007 ——0.0007 0.0305 0.0405 0.0589 0.1269 0.0332 0.0520 0.0801 0.2291 0.0305 ——0.0450 0.0373 ——0.0527 0.0024 0.0029 0.0041 0.0143 0.0048 0.0028 0.0045 0.3960 0.0023 ——0.0027 0.0042 ——0.0102 0.0011 0.0011 0.0020 0.0077 0.0014 0.0021 0.0036 0.0313 0.0011 ——0.0013 0.0016 ——0.0025 0.0011 0.0010 0.0011 0.0054 0.0013 0.0010 0.0021 0.0194 0.0011 ——0.0012 0.0013 ——0.0017 0.2092 0.2300 0.4800 2.0247 0.3096 0.2300 0.5700 2.1538 0.2388 ——0.6970 0.2615 ——0.7276 0.0033 0.0034 0.0035 0.0071 0.0032 0.0033 0.0035 0.0044 0.0033 ——0.0033 0.0032 ——0.0033 0.0012 0.0017 0.0017 0.0036 0.0011 0.0017 0.0017 0.0106 0.0012 ——0.0017 0.0012 ——0.0017 0.0023 0.0034 0.0035 0.0071 0.0018 0.0033 0.0035 0.0044 Page 372 Indicator Compound Averaging Period Courtice [µg/m³] Rundle [µg/m³] 0.0022 ——0.0033 0.0021 ——0.0033 0.0025 0.0034 0.0035 0.0071 0.0026 0.0033 0.0035 0.0412 0.0024 ——0.0033 0.0027 ——0.0039 0.0018 0.0017 0.0018 0.0202 0.0021 0.0017 0.0018 0.0384 0.0018 ——0.0022 0.0021 ——0.0029 0.0335 0.0391 0.0560 0.2460 0.0271 0.0346 0.0485 0.2460 0.0335 ——0.0345 0.0278 ——0.0312 Page 373 Table C3: Summary of Courtice, Rundle and Newmarket Monitoring Data for all other Available Indicator Compounds Indicator Compound Averaging Period Courtice [µg/m³] Rundle [µg/m³] Newmarket [µg/m³] Page 374 Indicator Compound Averaging Period Courtice [µg/m³] Rundle [µg/m³] Newmarket [µg/m³] Page 375 Indicator Compound Averaging Period Courtice [µg/m³] Rundle [µg/m³] Newmarket [µg/m³] Page 376 Page 377 September 2021 19117255 Main Stack - 140,000 TPA Source Description: Operating Rate: Methodology:Engineering calculations Source:Emission concentrations are taken from Facility specific in-stack emission limits, manufacturers specifications and published emission fatcors. Train Parameters:Volumetric flow rate per train during 140,000 tpa scenario 21.31 m³/s at reference conditions of 0% Moisture, 11% Oxygen and 298.15K temperature Volumetric flow rate per train during 140,000 tpa scenario 26.13 m³/s at actual conditions Sample Calculation 1:Particulate Matter Emission Rate Emission Rate [g/s] = Concentration[mg/Rm3] x volumetric flow rate [Rm³/s] x 1/1000 [mg/g] =4.84 mg 21 m³1 g m³s 1,000 mg =1.03E-01 g s Both boilers are operating to achieve 140,000 tpa Emissions from the main stack under current maximum operating scenario to process 140,000 tpa of waste. It was conservatively assumed to be operating at maximum capacity 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Made by: SC Checked by: KSA https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 1 of 10 Golder AssociatesPage 378 September 2021 19117255 Source Emissions: Indicator Compound CAS Number Concentration per train Units(1)Concentration Reference Emission Rate per Train [g/s] Total Emission Rate [g/s] Carbon Monoxide 630-08-0 4.00E+01 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 8.52E-01 1.70E+00 Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-05 3.50E+01 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 7.47E-01 1.49E+00 Total Suspended Particulate N/A -1 4.84E+00 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data*1.03E-01 2.06E-01 Filterable TSP N/A -2 9.00E+00 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.92E-01 3.84E-01 PM10 N/A -3 4.84E+00 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.03E-01 2.06E-01 PM2.5 N/A -4 4.58E+00 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.76E-02 1.95E-01 Lead 7439-92-1 5.00E-02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.07E-03 2.13E-03 Cadmium 7440-43-9 7.00E-03 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.49E-04 2.98E-04 Mercury 7439-97-6 1.50E-02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 3.20E-04 6.39E-04 Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3 1.00E-01 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.13E-03 4.26E-03 Dioxins, Furans and Dioxin- like PCBs N/A -6 6.00E-08 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 0.0013 µg TEQ/s 0.0026 µg TEQ/s Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 9.00E+00 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.92E-01 3.84E-01 Ammonia 7664-41-7 6.35E-01 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.35E-02 2.71E-02 Nitrogen Oxides 10102-44-0 1.21E+02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 2.58E+00 5.16E+00 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)N/A -7 6.50E-07 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.38E-08 2.77E-08 Aluminum 7429-90-5 3.98E-02 mg/Rm3 MECP Peel HHRA 8.47E-04 1.69E-03 Antimony 7440-36-0 5.15E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.10E-06 2.20E-06 Arsenic 7440-38-2 4.30E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.16E-07 1.83E-06 Barium 7440-39-3 1.51E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 3.22E-05 6.44E-05 Beryllium 7440-41-7 4.30E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.16E-07 1.83E-06 Boron 7440-42-8 1.53E-01 mg/Rm3 YD Generic Risk Assessment 3.26E-03 6.52E-03 Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 3.20E-04 mg/Rm3 Manufacturer Specification 6.82E-06 1.36E-05 Total Chromium (and compounds)7440-47-3 9.00E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.92E-05 3.84E-05 Cobalt 7440-48-4 5.15E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.10E-06 2.20E-06 Copper 7440-50-8 5.15E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.10E-04 2.20E-04 Molybdenum 7439-98-7 5.14E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-04 2.19E-04 Nickel 7440-02-0 1.21E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.57E-05 5.14E-05 Phosphorus 7723-14-0 4.60E-02 mg/Rm3 MECP Peel HHRA 9.81E-04 1.96E-03 Silver 7440-22-4 4.30E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.16E-07 1.83E-06 Selenium 7782-49-2 7.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.59E-05 3.18E-05 Thallium 7440-28-0 1.02E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.17E-06 4.35E-06 Tin 7440-31-5 1.76E-02 mg/Rm3 MECP Peel HHRA 3.75E-04 7.50E-04 Vanadium 7440-62-2 2.80E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 5.97E-07 1.19E-06 Zinc 7440-66-6 5.45E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.16E-04 2.32E-04 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 5.14E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-06 2.19E-06 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 95-94-3 4.24E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.03E-08 1.81E-07 1,2,4 – Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 1.96E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.19E-07 8.37E-07 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58-90-2 9.85E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.10E-07 4.20E-07 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 2.00E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.26E-07 8.52E-07 2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 1.04E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.22E-07 4.43E-07 Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 9.85E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.10E-07 4.20E-07 Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 1.97E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.20E-08 8.40E-08 Pentachlorobenzene 608-93-5 2.00E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.26E-08 8.52E-08 Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 1.97E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.20E-08 8.40E-08 Acenaphthene 83-32-9 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-07 2.07E-07 Anthracene 120-12-7 1.98E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.22E-08 8.44E-08 Made by: SC Checked by: KSA https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 2 of 10 Golder AssociatesPage 379 September 2021 19117255 Benzo(a)anthracene 56-55-3 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-07 2.07E-07 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-07 2.07E-07 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-07 2.07E-07 Benzo(a)fluorene 238-84-6 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-07 2.07E-07 Benzo(b)fluorene 243-17-4 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-07 2.07E-07 Benzo(ghi)perylene 191-24-2 7.10E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.51E-07 3.02E-07 Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-07 2.07E-07 Benzo(e)pyrene 192-97-2 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-07 2.07E-07 Biphenyl 92-52-4 1.93E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.12E-07 8.23E-07 Chrysene 218-01-9 2.23E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.75E-08 9.51E-08 Dibenzo(a,c)anthracene 215-58-7 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-07 2.07E-07 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-07 2.07E-07 Fluoranthene 206-44-0 7.11E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.52E-07 3.03E-07 Fluorene 86-73-7 3.35E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.13E-08 1.43E-07 Indeno(1,2,3 – cd)pyrene 193-39-5 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-07 2.07E-07 1 – methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 4.26E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.07E-08 1.81E-07 2 – methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 7.73E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.65E-07 3.29E-07 Naphthalene 91-20-3 4.70E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.00E-06 2.00E-06 Perylene 198-55-0 1.97E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.20E-08 8.40E-08 Phenanthrene 85-01-8 2.78E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 5.91E-07 1.18E-06 Pyrene 129-00-0 6.34E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.35E-07 2.70E-07 Tetralin 119-64-2 4.92E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.05E-06 2.10E-06 O-terphenyl 84-15-1 2.09E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.45E-08 8.91E-08 Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 4.90E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.04E-06 2.09E-06 Acrolein 1.98E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.21E-07 8.42E-07 Benzene 71-43-2 1.16E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.46E-05 4.92E-05 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 3.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.35E-06 1.47E-05 Bromoform 75-25-2 4.11E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 8.75E-06 1.75E-05 Bromomethane 74-83-9 3.10E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 6.61E-05 1.32E-04 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 3.20E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 6.81E-05 1.36E-04 Chloroform 67-66-3 3.01E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 6.40E-05 1.28E-04 Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 7.40E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.58E-05 3.15E-05 Dichloroethene, 1,1 -75-34-3 3.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.35E-06 1.47E-05 Dichloromethane 75-09-02 3.24E-02 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 6.91E-04 1.38E-03 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 1.07E-02 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.29E-04 4.58E-04 Ethylene Dibromide 106-93-4 6.90E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.47E-05 2.94E-05 Formaldehyde 50-00-0 4.05E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 8.63E-07 1.73E-06 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 3.70E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.89E-06 1.58E-05 Toluene 108-88-3 4.25E-02 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.05E-04 1.81E-03 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1 -71-55-6 3.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.35E-06 1.47E-05 Trichloroethene 86-42-0 3.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.35E-06 1.47E-05 Trichloroethylene, 1,1,2 -79-01-06 3.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.35E-06 1.47E-05 Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 2.18E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.64E-05 9.27E-05 Vinyl chloride 75-01-04 6.90E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.47E-05 2.94E-05 Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 1.01E-01 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.15E-03 4.29E-03 2. YD Generic Risk Assessment refers to Algonquin Power EFW plant in Ontario stack testing between 2003 and 2005. (Genivar/Jacques Whitford, 2007) 3. MECP Peel HHRA refers to MOE document "Environmental Risks of Municipal Non-Hazardous Waste Landfilling and Incineration" (MECP, 1999) 4. 2020 Source Testing Data refers to Annual Source Testing Data for DYEC (Ortech, 2021) 1. Concentrations are at reference conditions of 0% Moisture, 11% Oxygen and 298.15K temperature Made by: SC Checked by: KSA https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 3 of 10 Golder AssociatesPage 380 September 2021 19117255 Main Stack - 160,000 TPA Source Description: Operating Rate: Methodology:Engineering calculations Source:Emission concentrations are taken from Facility specific in-stack emission limits, manufacturers specifications and published emission fatcors. Train Parameters: Volumetric flow rate per train during 160,000 tpa scenario =22.37 m³/s at reference conditions of 0% Moisture, 11% Oxygen and 298.15K temperature Volumetric flow rate per train during 160,000 tpa scenario =29.71 m³/s at actual conditions Sample Calculation 1:Particulate matter emission per train Emission Rate [g/s] = Concentration[mg/dscm] x volumetric flow rate [dm³/s] x 1/1000 [mg/g] =4.84 mg 22.37 m³1 g m³s 1,000 mg =1.08E-01 g s Both boilers are operating to achieve 160,000 tpa Emissions from the main stack under the future maximum operating scenario to process 160,000 tpa of waste. It was conservatively assumed to be operating at maximum capacity 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Made by: SC Checked by: KSA https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 4 of 10 Golder AssociatesPage 381 September 2021 19117255 Source Emissions: Indicator Compound CAS Number Concentration per train Units(1)Concentration Reference Emission Rate per Train [g/s] Total Emission Rate [g/s] Carbon Monoxide 630-08-0 4.00E+01 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 8.95E-01 1.79E+00 Sulphur Dioxide 7446-09-05 3.50E+01 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 7.84E-01 1.57E+00 Total Suspended Particulate N/A -1 4.84E+00 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data*1.08E-01 2.166E-01 Filterable TSP N/A -2 9.00E+00 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 2.01E-01 4.03E-01 PM10 N/A -3 4.84E+00 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.08E-01 2.166E-01 PM2.5 N/A -4 4.58E+00 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.02E-01 2.049E-01 Lead 7439-92-1 5.00E-02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.12E-03 2.24E-03 Cadmium 7440-43-9 7.00E-03 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 1.57E-04 3.13E-04 Mercury 7439-97-6 1.50E-02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 3.36E-04 6.71E-04 Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3 1.00E-01 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.24E-03 4.47E-03 Dioxins, Furans and Dioxin- like PCBs N/A -6 6.00E-08 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 0.0013 µg TEQ/s 0.0027 µg TEQ/s Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 9.00E+00 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 2.01E-01 4.03E-01 Ammonia 7664-41-7 6.35E-01 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.42E-02 2.84E-02 Nitrogen Oxides 10102-44-0 1.21E+02 mg/Rm3 ECA Limit 2.71E+00 5.41E+00 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)N/A -7 6.50E-07 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.45E-08 2.91E-08 Aluminum 7429-90-5 3.98E-02 mg/Rm3 MECP Peel HHRA 8.89E-04 1.78E-03 Antimony 7440-36-0 5.15E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.15E-06 2.30E-06 Arsenic 7440-38-2 4.30E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.62E-07 1.92E-06 Barium 7440-39-3 1.51E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 3.38E-05 6.76E-05 Beryllium 7440-41-7 4.30E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.62E-07 1.92E-06 Boron 7440-42-8 1.53E-01 mg/Rm3 YD Generic Risk Assessment 3.42E-03 6.85E-03 Chromium (hexavalent)18540-29-9 3.20E-04 mg/Rm3 Manufacturer Specification 7.16E-06 1.43E-05 Total Chromium (and compounds)7440-47-3 9.00E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.01E-05 4.03E-05 Cobalt 7440-48-4 5.15E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.15E-06 2.30E-06 Copper 7440-50-8 5.15E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.15E-04 2.30E-04 Molybdenum 7439-98-7 5.14E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.15E-04 2.30E-04 Nickel 7440-02-0 1.21E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.70E-05 5.39E-05 Phosphorus 7723-14-0 4.60E-02 mg/Rm3 MECP Peel HHRA 1.03E-03 2.06E-03 Silver 7440-22-4 4.30E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.62E-07 1.92E-06 Selenium 7782-49-2 7.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.67E-05 3.33E-05 Thallium 7440-28-0 1.02E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.28E-06 4.56E-06 Tin 7440-31-5 1.76E-02 mg/Rm3 MECP Peel HHRA 3.94E-04 7.87E-04 Vanadium 7440-62-2 2.80E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 6.26E-07 1.25E-06 Zinc 7440-66-6 5.45E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.22E-04 2.44E-04 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 5.14E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.15E-06 2.30E-06 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 95-94-3 4.24E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.48E-08 1.90E-07 1,2,4 – Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 1.96E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.39E-07 8.79E-07 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58-90-2 9.85E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.20E-07 4.41E-07 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 2.00E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.47E-07 8.95E-07 2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 1.04E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.33E-07 4.65E-07 Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 9.85E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.20E-07 4.41E-07 Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 1.97E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.41E-08 8.82E-08 Pentachlorobenzene 608-93-5 2.00E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.47E-08 8.95E-08 Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 1.97E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.41E-08 8.82E-08 Acenaphthene 83-32-9 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-07 2.18E-07 Anthracene 120-12-7 1.98E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.43E-08 8.86E-08 Made by: SC Checked by: KSA https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 5 of 10 Golder AssociatesPage 382 September 2021 19117255 Benzo(a)anthracene 56-55-3 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-07 2.18E-07 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-07 2.18E-07 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-07 2.18E-07 Benzo(a)fluorene 238-84-6 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-07 2.18E-07 Benzo(b)fluorene 243-17-4 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-07 2.18E-07 Benzo(ghi)perylene 191-24-2 7.10E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.59E-07 3.17E-07 Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-07 2.18E-07 Benzo(e)pyrene 192-97-2 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-07 2.18E-07 Biphenyl 92-52-4 1.93E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.32E-07 8.64E-07 Chrysene 218-01-9 2.23E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.99E-08 9.98E-08 Dibenzo(a,c)anthracene 215-58-7 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-07 2.18E-07 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-07 2.18E-07 Fluoranthene 206-44-0 7.11E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.59E-07 3.18E-07 Fluorene 86-73-7 3.35E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.48E-08 1.50E-07 Indeno(1,2,3 – cd)pyrene 193-39-5 4.87E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.09E-07 2.18E-07 1 – methylnaphthalene 90-12-0 4.26E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.52E-08 1.90E-07 2 – methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 7.73E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.73E-07 3.46E-07 Naphthalene 91-20-3 4.70E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.05E-06 2.10E-06 Perylene 198-55-0 1.97E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.41E-08 8.82E-08 Phenanthrene 85-01-8 2.78E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 6.21E-07 1.24E-06 Pyrene 129-00-0 6.34E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.42E-07 2.83E-07 Tetralin 119-64-2 4.92E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.10E-06 2.20E-06 O-terphenyl 84-15-1 2.09E-06 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.68E-08 9.35E-08 Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 4.90E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.10E-06 2.19E-06 Acrolein 107-02-8 1.98E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.42E-07 8.84E-07 Benzene 71-43-2 1.16E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.58E-05 5.17E-05 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 3.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.72E-06 1.54E-05 Bromoform 75-25-2 4.11E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.19E-06 1.84E-05 Bromomethane 74-83-9 3.10E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 6.94E-05 1.39E-04 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 3.20E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.15E-05 1.43E-04 Chloroform 67-66-3 3.01E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 6.72E-05 1.34E-04 Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 7.40E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.66E-05 3.31E-05 Dichloroethene, 1,1 -75-34-3 3.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.72E-06 1.54E-05 Dichloromethane 75-09-02 3.24E-02 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.25E-04 1.45E-03 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 1.07E-02 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.40E-04 4.81E-04 Ethylene Dibromide 106-93-4 6.90E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.54E-05 3.09E-05 Formaldehyde 50-00-0 4.05E-05 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.06E-07 1.81E-06 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 3.70E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 8.28E-06 1.66E-05 Toluene 108-88-3 4.25E-02 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 9.50E-04 1.90E-03 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1 -71-55-6 3.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.72E-06 1.54E-05 Trichloroethene 86-42-0 3.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.72E-06 1.54E-05 Trichloroethylene, 1,1,2 -79-01-06 3.45E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 7.72E-06 1.54E-05 Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 2.18E-03 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 4.87E-05 9.73E-05 Vinyl chloride 75-01-04 6.90E-04 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 1.54E-05 3.09E-05 Xylenes, m-, p- and o-1330-20-7 1.01E-01 mg/Rm3 2020 Source Testing Data 2.25E-03 4.51E-03 2. YD Generic Risk Assessment refers to Algonquin Power EFW plant in Ontario stack testing between 2003 and 2005. (Genivar/Jacques Whitford, 2007) 3. MECP Peel HHRA refers to MOE document "Environmental Risks of Municipal Non-Hazardous Waste Landfilling and Incineration" (MECP, 1999) 4. 2020 Source Testing Data refers to Annual Source Testing Data for DYEC (Ortech, 2021) 1. Concentrations are at reference conditions of 0% Moisture, 11% Oxygen and 298.15K temperature Made by: SC Checked by: KSA https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 6 of 10 Golder AssociatesPage 383 September 2021 19117255 Source 2 Silo Filling Source Description: Parameter Pebble Lime Carbon Pozzolan Portland Cement Usage rate (lb/hr)401 60 207 227 Delivery Payload (tons)20 20 25 20 Delivery Payload (tonnes)18.1 18.1 22.7 18.1 Fill Frequency (days)4.2 27.8 10.1 7.3 Deliveries per year 88.8 14.1 37.3 50.7 Operating Rate: Methodology:Emission Factor Source:Provided by Covanta Train Parameters:Baghouse Filter Efficiency 0.0344 g/m3 Filter Flow Rate 0.31 m3/s Sample Calculation:Particulate Matter from Pebble Lime Silo 1-hour Emission Rate [g/s] = Flow Rate [m3/s] x Filter Efficiency [g/m3] =0.03 g 0.31 m³ m3 s =1.07E-02 g s 24-hour Emission Rate [g/s]1-hour Emission Rate x daily hours of operation =1.07E-02 g 4 hour s 24 hours =1.79E-03 g s There are four (4) silos at the facility. Emissions occur during silo filling and are controlled via a baghouse. Properties of each silo are given in the following table: Maximum emissions occur during silo filling which takes approximately 4 hours per silo. Made by: SC Checked by: KSA https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 7 of 10 Golder AssociatesPage 384 September 2021 19117255 Made by: SC Checked by: KSA https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 8 of 10 Golder AssociatesPage 385 September 2021 19117255 Source Emissions: Silo Indicator Compound CAS Number Hourly Emission Rate [g/s] Daily Emission Rate [g/s] Total Suspended Particulate N/A -1 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 PM10 N/A -3 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 PM2.5 N/A -4 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 Total Suspended Particulate N/A -1 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 PM10 N/A -3 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 PM2.5 N/A -4 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 Total Suspended Particulate N/A -1 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 PM10 N/A -3 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 PM2.5 N/A -4 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 Total Suspended Particulate N/A -1 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 PM10 N/A -3 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 PM2.5 N/A -4 1.07E-02 1.79E-03 Pebble Lime Carbon Pozzolan Portland Cement Made by: SC Checked by: KSA https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 9 of 10 Golder AssociatesPage 386 September 2021 19117255 Source 3 Stand-by Generator Source Description: Operating Rate: Methodology:Emission Factor Source:Diesel firing emission factors are taken from US EPA AP42 chapter 3.4 Equipment Parameters:Maximum Power Rating 402 HP Sample Calculation :Nitrogen Oxides 1-hour Emission Rate [g/s] = Emission Factor [lb/hp-hr] x Maximum Heat Input [hp/hr] x 454[g/lb] / 3600 [hr/s] =0.02 lb 402 HP 454 g 1 hr hp-hr hr 1 lb 3600 s =1.22E+00 g s 24-hour Emission Rate [g/s]1-hour Emission Rate x daily hours of operation =1.22E+00 g 1 hour s 24 hours =5.07E-02 g s Source Emissions: Indicator Compound CAS Number US EPA EF [lb/hp-hr]Units Hourly Emission Rate [g/s] Daily Emission Rate [g/s] Annual Emission Rate [g/s] Nitrogen Oxides 10102-44-0 2.40E-02 lb/hp-hr 1.22E+00 5.07E-02 7.22E-03 The Facility has one stand-by generator with a 300 kw power rating Maximum emissions occur when the diesel generator is operating at 100% capacity. The generator is typically tested for a 1 hour period, once per month Made by: SC Checked by: KSA https://golderassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/104166/Project Files/5 Technical Work/19117255 Calculations and Tables Covanta-EFW Durham york 13022019 Page 10 of 10 Golder AssociatesPage 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 d Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412   Page 413 Figure 1: Location of Courtice and Rundle Stations O. Reg. 419/05 O. Reg. 419/05 O. Reg. 419/05 Page 414 STATION CALIBRATION METEOROLOGICAL TOWER HEIGHT Page 415 Meteorological Data Analysis     Table 1: Meteorological Station Comparison Station Name ID Maintained by Approximate Distance from DYEC Approximate Distance from Lake Ontario Tower height Page 416 Data Availability Table 2: Courtice Station - Data Availability (2014-2018) Data Year Temperature Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction 100%100%100%100% 100%100%100%100% 100%99%100%100% 100%100%100%100% 97%96%99%99% Table 3: Rundle Station - Data Availability (2014-2018) Data Year Temperature Relative Humidity Wind Speed Wind Direction 100%100%100%100% 100%100%100%100% 100%100%100%100% 100%100%100%99% 95%95%85%85% Review of Temperature Data Page 417 minimum monthly temperature maximum monthly temperature diurnal temperature Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Review of Relative Humidity Data Figure 4: Comparison of Average Relative Humidity for 2014-2018 Data Period Page 421 Review of Wind Data Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Figure 5: Annual Windroses for the 2014-2018 Data Period by Station Page 425 Summary of Data Analysis Conclusions Page 426 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 427 METEOROLOGICAL STATION CALIBRATION DATA SHEET Installed Equipment Windhead Check Calibrator: Wind Direction (deg from) Wind Speed (m/s) Error Allowance for WS component (+/- 0.72 km/h + 5% of Reference Value)_____ Temperature Check Page 428 Barometric Pressure Check Relative Humidity Check Precipitation Check Page 429 Client:Date: Station ID: Operator: Installed Equipment Windhead Check  Temperature Check  Meteorological Station Calibration Data Sheet Parameter Model Wind Direction (deg from)Wind Speed (m/s) Page 430 Barometric Pressure Check Relative Humidity Check  Precipitation Check    Page 431 Client:Date: Station ID: Operator: Installed Equipment Windhead Check Temperature Check  Meteorological Station Calibration Data Sheet Parameter Model Wind Direction (deg from)Wind Speed (m/s) Page 432 Barometric Pressure Check Relative Humidity Check  Precipitation Check    Page 433 Page 434 1. CALMET.INP 1 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor CALMET.INP 2.2 Hour Start and End Times with Seconds Template CALMET simulation for winter months 19117255 DYEC 2021 AQIA ---------------- Run title (3 lines) ------------------------------------------ CALMET MODEL CONTROL FILE -------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 0 -- Input and Output File Names Subgroup (a) ------------ Default Name Type File Name ------------ ------------- GEO.DAT input ! GEODAT=GEO_UD_WINTER_DYEC.DAT ! SURF.DAT input ! SRFDAT=SURF.DAT ! CLOUD.DAT input * CLDDAT=* PRECIP.DAT input * CLDDAT=* WT.DAT input * WTDAT=* CALMET.LST output ! METLST=CALMET_W1.LST ! CALMET.DAT output ! METDAT=CALMET_W1.DAT ! PACOUT.DAT output * PACDAT=* All file names will be converted to lower case if LCFILES = T Otherwise, if LCFILES = F, file names will be converted to UPPER CASE T = lower case ! LCFILES = F ! F = UPPER CASE NUMBER OF UPPER AIR & OVERWATER STATIONS: Number of upper air stations (NUSTA) No default ! NUSTA = 0 ! Number of overwater met stations (NOWSTA) No default ! NOWSTA = 1 ! NUMBER OF PROGNOSTIC and IGF-CALMET FILEs: Number of MM4/MM5/3D.DAT files (NM3D) No default ! NM3D = 1 ! Number of IGF-CALMET.DAT files (NIGF) No default ! NIGF = 0 ! !END! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subgroup (b) --------------------------------- Upper air files (one per station) --------------------------------- Default Name Type File Name ------------ ---- --------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subgroup (c) ----------------------------------------- Overwater station files (one per station) ----------------------------------------- Default Name Type File Name ------------ ---- --------- SEA1.DAT input 1 ! SEADAT=BUOY.DAT! !END! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subgroup (d) Page 435 1. CALMET.INP 2 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor ------------------------------------------------ MM4/MM5/3D.DAT files (consecutive or overlapping) ------------------------------------------------ Default Name Type File Name ------------ ---- --------- MM51.DAT input 1 ! M3DDAT=201401.DAT! !END! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subgroup (e) ------------------------------------------------- IGF-CALMET.DAT files (consecutive or overlapping) ------------------------------------------------- Default Name Type File Name ------------ ---- --------- IGFn.DAT input 1 * IGFDAT=CALMET0.DAT * *END* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subgroup (f) ---------------- Other file names ---------------- Default Name Type File Name ------------ ---- --------- DIAG.DAT input * DIADAT=* PROG.DAT input * PRGDAT=* TEST.PRT output * TSTPRT=* TEST.OUT output * TSTOUT=* TEST.KIN output * TSTKIN=* TEST.FRD output * TSTFRD=* TEST.SLP output * TSTSLP=* DCST.GRD output * DCSTGD=* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES: (1) File/path names can be up to 70 characters in length (2) Subgroups (a) and (f) must have ONE 'END' (surrounded by delimiters) at the end of the group (3) Subgroups (b) through (e) are included ONLY if the corresponding number of files (NUSTA, NOWSTA, NM3D, NIGF) is not 0, and each must have an 'END' (surround by delimiters) at the end of EACH LINE !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 1 -- General run control parameters -------------- Starting date: Year (IBYR) -- No default ! IBYR = 2014 ! Month (IBMO) -- No default ! IBMO = 1 ! Day (IBDY) -- No default ! IBDY = 1 ! Starting time: Hour (IBHR) -- No default ! IBHR = 0 ! Second (IBSEC) -- No default ! IBSEC = 0 ! Ending date: Year (IEYR) -- No default ! IEYR = 2014 ! Month (IEMO) -- No default ! IEMO = 1 ! Day (IEDY) -- No default ! IEDY = 31 ! Ending time: Hour (IEHR) -- No default ! IEHR = 23 ! Second (IESEC) -- No default ! IESEC = 3600 ! UTC time zone (ABTZ) -- No default ! ABTZ= UTC-0500 ! (character*8) PST = UTC-0800, MST = UTC-0700 , GMT = UTC-0000 Page 436 1. CALMET.INP 3 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor CST = UTC-0600, EST = UTC-0500 Length of modeling time-step (seconds) Must divide evenly into 3600 (1 hour) (NSECDT)Default:3600 ! NSECDT = 3600 ! Units: seconds Run type (IRTYPE) -- Default: 1 ! IRTYPE= 1 ! 0 = Computes wind fields only 1 = Computes wind fields and micrometeorological variables (u*, w*, L, zi, etc.) (IRTYPE must be 1 to run CALPUFF or CALGRID) Compute special data fields required by CALGRID (i.e., 3-D fields of W wind components and temperature) in additional to regular Default: T ! LCALGRD = T ! fields ? (LCALGRD) (LCALGRD must be T to run CALGRID) Flag to stop run after SETUP phase (ITEST)Default: 2 ! ITEST= 2 ! (Used to allow checking of the model inputs, files, etc.) ITEST = 1 - STOPS program after SETUP phase ITEST = 2 - Continues with execution of COMPUTATIONAL phase after SETUP Test options specified to see if they conform to regulatory values? (MREG)No Default ! MREG = 0 ! 0 = NO checks are made 1 = Technical options must conform to USEPA guidance IMIXH -1 Maul-Carson convective mixing height over land; OCD mixing height overwater ICOARE 0 OCD deltaT method for overwater fluxes THRESHL 0.0 Threshold buoyancy flux over land needed to sustain convective mixing height growth ISURFT > 0 in OBS mode (pick one representative station) -2 in NOOBS mode (itprog=2) (average all surface prognostic temperatures to get a single representative sf. temp) IUPT > 0 in OBS mode (pick one representative station) -2 in NOOBS mode (ITPROG>0) (average all surface prognostic temperatures to get a single representative sf. temp) IZICRLX 0 Do NOT use convective mixing height relaxation to equilibrium value !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 2 -- Map Projection and Grid control parameters -------------- Projection for all (X,Y): ------------------------- Map projection (PMAP)Default: UTM ! PMAP = UTM ! UTM : Universal Transverse Mercator Page 437 1. CALMET.INP 4 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor TTM : Tangential Transverse Mercator LCC : Lambert Conformal Conic PS : Polar Stereographic EM : Equatorial Mercator LAZA : Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area False Easting and Northing (km) at the projection origin (Used only if PMAP= TTM, LCC, or LAZA) (FEAST)Default=0.0 ! FEAST = 0.000 ! (FNORTH)Default=0.0 ! FNORTH = 0.000 ! UTM zone (1 to 60) (Used only if PMAP=UTM) (IUTMZN)No Default ! IUTMZN = 17 ! Hemisphere for UTM projection? (Used only if PMAP=UTM) (UTMHEM)Default: N ! UTMHEM = N ! N : Northern hemisphere projection S : Southern hemisphere projection Latitude and Longitude (decimal degrees) of projection origin (Used only if PMAP= TTM, LCC, PS, EM, or LAZA) (RLAT0)No Default ! RLAT0 = 40N ! (RLON0)No Default ! RLON0 = 90E ! TTM : RLON0 identifies central (true N/S) meridian of projection RLAT0 selected for convenience LCC : RLON0 identifies central (true N/S) meridian of projection RLAT0 selected for convenience PS : RLON0 identifies central (grid N/S) meridian of projection RLAT0 selected for convenience EM : RLON0 identifies central meridian of projection RLAT0 is REPLACED by 0.0N (Equator) LAZA: RLON0 identifies longitude of tangent-point of mapping plane RLAT0 identifies latitude of tangent-point of mapping plane Matching parallel(s) of latitude (decimal degrees) for projection (Used only if PMAP= LCC or PS) (XLAT1)No Default ! XLAT1 = 30N ! (XLAT2)No Default ! XLAT2 = 60N ! LCC : Projection cone slices through Earth's surface at XLAT1 and XLAT2 PS : Projection plane slices through Earth at XLAT1 (XLAT2 is not used) ---------- Note: Latitudes and longitudes should be positive, and include a letter N,S,E, or W indicating north or south latitude, and east or west longitude. For example, 35.9 N Latitude = 35.9N 118.7 E Longitude = 118.7E Datum-region ------------ The Datum-Region for the coordinates is identified by a character string. Many mapping products currently available use the model of the Earth known as the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS-84). Other local models may be in use, and their selection in CALMET will make its output consistent with local mapping products. The list of Datum-Regions with official transformation parameters is provided by the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA). NIMA Datum - Regions(Examples) Page 438 1. CALMET.INP 5 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WGS-84 WGS-84 Reference Ellipsoid and Geoid, Global coverage (WGS84) NAS-C NORTH AMERICAN 1927 Clarke 1866 Spheroid, MEAN FOR CONUS (NAD27) NAR-C NORTH AMERICAN 1983 GRS 80 Spheroid, MEAN FOR CONUS (NAD83) NWS-84 NWS 6370KM Radius, Sphere ESR-S ESRI REFERENCE 6371KM Radius, Sphere Datum-region for output coordinates (DATUM)Default: WGS-84 ! DATUM = WGS-84 ! Horizontal grid definition: --------------------------- Rectangular grid defined for projection PMAP, with X the Easting and Y the Northing coordinate No. X grid cells (NX) No default ! NX = 160 ! No. Y grid cells (NY) No default ! NY = 160 ! Grid spacing (DGRIDKM)No default ! DGRIDKM = 0.25 ! Units: km Reference grid coordinate of SOUTHWEST corner of grid cell (1,1) X coordinate (XORIGKM)No default ! XORIGKM = 662.536 ! Y coordinate (YORIGKM)No default ! YORIGKM = 4845.000 ! Units: km Vertical grid definition: ------------------------- No. of vertical layers (NZ) No default ! NZ = 8 ! Cell face height in arbitrary vertical grid (ZFACE(NZ+1)) No defaults Units: m ! ZFACE = 0.,20.,50.,100.,200.,500.,1000.,2000.,3300. ! !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 3 -- Output Options -------------- DISK OUTPUT OPTION Save met. fields in an unformatted output file ?(LSAVE) Default: T ! LSAVE = T ! (F = Do not save, T = Save) Type of unformatted output file: (IFORMO)Default: 1 ! IFORMO = 1 ! 1 = CALPUFF/CALGRID type file (CALMET.DAT) 2 = MESOPUFF-II type file (PACOUT.DAT) LINE PRINTER OUTPUT OPTIONS: Print met. fields ? (LPRINT) Default: F ! LPRINT = F ! Page 439 1. CALMET.INP 6 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor (F = Do not print, T = Print) (NOTE: parameters below control which met. variables are printed) Print interval (IPRINF) in hours Default: 1 ! IPRINF = 1 ! (Meteorological fields are printed every 1 hours) Specify which layers of U, V wind component to print (IUVOUT(NZ)) -- NOTE: NZ values must be entered (0=Do not print, 1=Print) (used only if LPRINT=T) Defaults: NZ*0 ! IUVOUT = 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ! ----------------------- Specify which levels of the W wind component to print (NOTE: W defined at TOP cell face -- 10 values) (IWOUT(NZ)) -- NOTE: NZ values must be entered (0=Do not print, 1=Print) (used only if LPRINT=T & LCALGRD=T) ----------------------------------- Defaults: NZ*0 ! IWOUT = 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ! Specify which levels of the 3-D temperature field to print (ITOUT(NZ)) -- NOTE: NZ values must be entered (0=Do not print, 1=Print) (used only if LPRINT=T & LCALGRD=T) ----------------------------------- Defaults: NZ*0 ! ITOUT = 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ! Specify which meteorological fields to print (used only if LPRINT=T)Defaults: 0 (all variables) ----------------------- Variable Print ? (0 = do not print, 1 = print) -------- ------------------ ! STABILITY =0 ! - PGT stability class ! USTAR =0 ! - Friction velocity ! MONIN =0 ! - Monin-Obukhov length ! MIXHT =0 ! - Mixing height ! WSTAR =0 ! - Convective velocity scale ! PRECIP =0 ! - Precipitation rate ! SENSHEAT =0 ! - Sensible heat flux ! CONVZI =0 ! - Convective mixing ht. Testing and debug print options for micrometeorological module Print input meteorological data and internal variables (LDB)Default: F ! LDB = F ! (F = Do not print, T = print) (NOTE: this option produces large amounts of output) First time step for which debug data are printed (NN1)Default: 1 ! NN1 = 1 ! Page 440 1. CALMET.INP 7 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor Last time step for which debug data are printed (NN2)Default: 1 ! NN2 = 1 ! Print distance to land internal variables (LDBCST) Default: F ! LDBCST = F ! (F = Do not print, T = print) (Output in .GRD file DCST.GRD, defined in input group 0) Testing and debug print options for wind field module (all of the following print options control output to wind field module's output files: TEST.PRT, TEST.OUT, TEST.KIN, TEST.FRD, and TEST.SLP) Control variable for writing the test/debug wind fields to disk files (IOUTD) (0=Do not write, 1=write) Default: 0 ! IOUTD = 0 ! Number of levels, starting at the surface, to print (NZPRN2)Default: 1 ! NZPRN2 = 0 ! Print the INTERPOLATED wind components ? (IPR0) (0=no, 1=yes)Default: 0 ! IPR0 = 0 ! Print the TERRAIN ADJUSTED surface wind components ? (IPR1) (0=no, 1=yes)Default: 0 ! IPR1 = 0 ! Print the SMOOTHED wind components and the INITIAL DIVERGENCE fields ? (IPR2) (0=no, 1=yes)Default: 0 ! IPR2 = 0 ! Print the FINAL wind speed and direction fields ? (IPR3) (0=no, 1=yes)Default: 0 ! IPR3 = 0 ! Print the FINAL DIVERGENCE fields ? (IPR4) (0=no, 1=yes)Default: 0 ! IPR4 = 0 ! Print the winds after KINEMATIC effects are added ? (IPR5) (0=no, 1=yes)Default: 0 ! IPR5 = 0 ! Print the winds after the FROUDE NUMBER adjustment is made ? (IPR6) (0=no, 1=yes)Default: 0 ! IPR6 = 0 ! Print the winds after SLOPE FLOWS are added ? (IPR7) (0=no, 1=yes)Default: 0 ! IPR7 = 0 ! Print the FINAL wind field components ? (IPR8) (0=no, 1=yes)Default: 0 ! IPR8 = 0 ! !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 4 -- Meteorological data options -------------- NO OBSERVATION MODE (NOOBS) Default: 0 ! NOOBS = 1 ! 0 = Use surface, overwater, and upper air stations 1 = Use surface and overwater stations (no upper air observations) Use MM4/MM5/3D for upper air data Page 441 1. CALMET.INP 8 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2 = No surface, overwater, or upper air observations Use MM4/MM5/3D for surface, overwater, and upper air data NUMBER OF SURFACE & PRECIP. METEOROLOGICAL STATIONS Number of surface stations (NSSTA) No default ! NSSTA = 8 ! Number of precipitation stations (NPSTA=-1: flag for use of MM5/3D precip data) (NPSTA) No default ! NPSTA = -1 ! CLOUD DATA OPTIONS Output option - output a CLOUD.DAT file (yes or no) 0=no, 1=yes (ICLDOUT) Default:999 ! ICLDOUT = 0 ! Method to compute cloud fields: (MCLOUD) Default: 999 ! MCLOUD = 1 ! MCLOUD = 1 - Clouds data generated from surface observations MCLOUD = 2 - Gridded CLOUD.DAT read from CLOUD.DAT file (no output is possible since already exist) MCLOUD = 3 - Gridded cloud cover from Prognostic Rel. Humidity at 850mb (Teixera) MCLOUD = 4 - Gridded cloud cover from Prognostic Rel. Humidity at all levels (MM5toGrads algorithm) FILE FORMATS Surface meteorological data file format (IFORMS) Default: 2 ! IFORMS = 2 ! (1 = unformatted (e.g., SMERGE output)) (2 = formatted (free-formatted user input)) Precipitation data file format (IFORMP) Default: 2 ! IFORMP = 2 ! (1 = unformatted (e.g., PMERGE output)) (2 = formatted (free-formatted user input)) Cloud data file format (IFORMC) Default: 2 ! IFORMC = 2 ! (1 = unformatted - CALMET unformatted output) (2 = formatted - free-formatted CALMET output or user input) !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 5 -- Wind Field Options and Parameters -------------- WIND FIELD MODEL OPTIONS Model selection variable (IWFCOD) Default: 1 ! IWFCOD = 1 ! 0 = Objective analysis only 1 = Diagnostic wind module Compute Froude number adjustment effects ? (IFRADJ)Default: 1 ! IFRADJ = 1 ! (0 = NO, 1 = YES) Compute kinematic effects ? (IKINE) Default: 0 ! IKINE = 0 ! (0 = NO, 1 = YES) Use O'Brien procedure for adjustment of the vertical velocity ? (IOBR) Default: 0 ! IOBR = 0 ! Page 442 1. CALMET.INP 9 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor (0 = NO, 1 = YES) Compute slope flow effects ? (ISLOPE) Default: 1 ! ISLOPE = 1 ! (0 = NO, 1 = YES) Extrapolate surface wind observations to upper layers ? (IEXTRP)Default: -4 ! IEXTRP = -4 ! (1 = no extrapolation is done, 2 = power law extrapolation used, 3 = user input multiplicative factors for layers 2 - NZ used (see FEXTRP array) 4 = similarity theory used -1, -2, -3, -4 = same as above except layer 1 data at upper air stations are ignored Extrapolate surface winds even if calm? (ICALM)Default: 0 ! ICALM = 0 ! (0 = NO, 1 = YES) Layer-dependent biases modifying the weights of surface and upper air stations (BIAS(NZ)) -1<=BIAS<=1 Negative BIAS reduces the weight of upper air stations (e.g. BIAS=-0.1 reduces the weight of upper air stations by 10%; BIAS= -1, reduces their weight by 100 %) Positive BIAS reduces the weight of surface stations (e.g. BIAS= 0.2 reduces the weight of surface stations by 20%; BIAS=1 reduces their weight by 100%) Zero BIAS leaves weights unchanged (1/R**2 interpolation) Default: NZ*0 ! BIAS = 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ! Minimum distance from nearest upper air station to surface station for which extrapolation of surface winds at surface station will be allowed (RMIN2: Set to -1 for IEXTRP = 4 or other situations where all surface stations should be extrapolated) Default: 4. ! RMIN2 = -1.0 ! Use gridded prognostic wind field model output fields as input to the diagnostic wind field model (IPROG)Default: 0 ! IPROG = 14 ! (0 = No, [IWFCOD = 0 or 1] 1 = Yes, use CSUMM prog. winds as Step 1 field, [IWFCOD = 0] 2 = Yes, use CSUMM prog. winds as initial guess field [IWFCOD = 1] 3 = Yes, use winds from MM4.DAT file as Step 1 field [IWFCOD = 0] 4 = Yes, use winds from MM4.DAT file as initial guess field [IWFCOD = 1] 5 = Yes, use winds from MM4.DAT file as observations [IWFCOD = 1] 13 = Yes, use winds from MM5/3D.DAT file as Step 1 field [IWFCOD = 0] 14 = Yes, use winds from MM5/3D.DAT file as initial guess field [IWFCOD = 1] 15 = Yes, use winds from MM5/3D.DAT file as observations [IWFCOD = 1] Timestep (seconds) of the prognostic model input data (ISTEPPGS) Default: 3600 ! ISTEPPGS = 3600 ! Use coarse CALMET fields as initial guess fields (IGFMET) (overwrites IGF based on prognostic wind fields if any) Default: 0 ! IGFMET = 0 ! RADIUS OF INFLUENCE PARAMETERS Use varying radius of influence Default: F ! LVARY = F! (if no stations are found within RMAX1,RMAX2, or RMAX3, then the closest station will be used) Maximum radius of influence over land Page 443 1. CALMET.INP 10 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor in the surface layer (RMAX1)No default ! RMAX1 = 30. ! Units: km Maximum radius of influence over land aloft (RMAX2)No default ! RMAX2 = 30. ! Units: km Maximum radius of influence over water (RMAX3)No default ! RMAX3 = 128. ! Units: km OTHER WIND FIELD INPUT PARAMETERS Minimum radius of influence used in the wind field interpolation (RMIN) Default: 0.1 ! RMIN = 0.1 ! Units: km Radius of influence of terrain features (TERRAD)No default ! TERRAD = 2. ! Units: km Relative weighting of the first guess field and observations in the SURFACE layer (R1)No default ! R1 = 2. ! (R1 is the distance from an Units: km observational station at which the observation and first guess field are equally weighted) Relative weighting of the first guess field and observations in the layers ALOFT (R2)No default ! R2 = 2. ! (R2 is applied in the upper layers Units: km in the same manner as R1 is used in the surface layer). Relative weighting parameter of the prognostic wind field data (RPROG) No default ! RPROG = 0. ! (Used only if IPROG = 1)Units: km ------------------------ Maximum acceptable divergence in the divergence minimization procedure (DIVLIM)Default: 5.E-6 ! DIVLIM= 5.0E-06 ! Maximum number of iterations in the divergence min. procedure (NITER) Default: 50 ! NITER = 50 ! Number of passes in the smoothing procedure (NSMTH(NZ)) NOTE: NZ values must be entered Default: 2,(mxnz-1)*4 ! NSMTH = 2 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 4 ! Maximum number of stations used in each layer for the interpolation of data to a grid point (NINTR2(NZ)) NOTE: NZ values must be entered Default: 99. ! NINTR2 = 99 ! Critical Froude number (CRITFN) Default: 1.0 ! CRITFN = 1. ! Empirical factor controlling the influence of kinematic effects (ALPHA)Default: 0.1 ! ALPHA = 0.1 ! Multiplicative scaling factor for extrapolation of surface observations to upper layers (FEXTR2(NZ))Default: NZ*0.0 Page 444 1. CALMET.INP 11 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor ! FEXTR2 = 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0. ! (Used only if IEXTRP = 3 or -3) BARRIER INFORMATION Number of barriers to interpolation of the wind fields (NBAR)Default: 0 ! NBAR = 0 ! Level (1 to NZ) up to which barriers apply (KBAR)Default: NZ ! KBAR = 8 ! THE FOLLOWING 4 VARIABLES ARE INCLUDED ONLY IF NBAR > 0 NOTE: NBAR values must be entered No defaults for each variable Units: km X coordinate of BEGINNING of each barrier (XBBAR(NBAR)) ! XBBAR = 0. ! Y coordinate of BEGINNING of each barrier (YBBAR(NBAR)) ! YBBAR = 0. ! X coordinate of ENDING of each barrier (XEBAR(NBAR)) ! XEBAR = 0. ! Y coordinate of ENDING of each barrier (YEBAR(NBAR)) ! YEBAR = 0. ! DIAGNOSTIC MODULE DATA INPUT OPTIONS Surface temperature (IDIOPT1)Default: 0 ! IDIOPT1 = 0 ! 0 = Compute internally from hourly surface observations or prognostic fields 1 = Read preprocessed values from a data file (DIAG.DAT) Surface met. station to use for the surface temperature (ISURFT) Default: -1 ! ISURFT = -1 ! (Must be a value from 1 to NSSTA or -1 to use 2-D spatially varying surface temperatures). or -2 to use a domain-average prognostic lapse rate (only with ITPROG=2) (Used only if IDIOPT1 = 0) -------------------------- Temperature lapse rate used in the Default: 0 ! IDIOPT2 = 0 ! computation of terrain-induced circulations (IDIOPT2) 0 = Compute internally from (at least) twice-daily upper air observations or prognostic fields 1 = Read hourly preprocessed values from a data file (DIAG.DAT) Upper air station to use for the domain-scale lapse rate (IUPT) Default: -1 ! IUPT = -1 ! (Must be a value from 1 to NUSTA or -1 to use 2-D spatially varying lapse rate) or -2 to use a domain-average prognostic lapse rate (only with ITPROG>0) (Used only if IDIOPT2 = 0) -------------------------- Depth through which the domain-scale lapse rate is computed (ZUPT) Default: 200. ! ZUPT = 200. ! (Used only if IDIOPT2 = 0)Units: meters Page 445 1. CALMET.INP 12 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor -------------------------- Initial Guess Field Winds (IDIOPT3)Default: 0 ! IDIOPT3 = 0 ! 0 = Compute internally from observations or prognostic wind fields 1 = Read hourly preprocessed domain-average wind values from a data file (DIAG.DAT) Upper air station to use for the initial guess winds (IUPWND) Default: -1 ! IUPWND = -1 ! (Must be a value from -1 to NUSTA, with -1 indicating 3-D initial guess fields, and IUPWND>1 domain-scaled (i.e. constant) IGF (Used only if IDIOPT3 = 0 and noobs=0) --------------------------------------- Bottom and top of layer through which the domain-scale winds are computed (ZUPWND(1), ZUPWND(2)) Defaults: 1., 1000. ! ZUPWND= 1., 1000. ! (Used only if IDIOPT3 = 0, NOOBS>0 and IUPWND>0) Units: meters -------------------------- Observed surface wind components for wind field module (IDIOPT4) Default: 0 ! IDIOPT4 = 0 ! 0 = Read WS, WD from a surface data file (SURF.DAT) 1 = Read hourly preprocessed U, V from a data file (DIAG.DAT) Observed upper air wind components for wind field module (IDIOPT5) Default: 0 ! IDIOPT5 = 0 ! 0 = Read WS, WD from an upper air data file (UP1.DAT, UP2.DAT, etc.) 1 = Read hourly preprocessed U, V from a data file (DIAG.DAT) LAKE BREEZE INFORMATION Use Lake Breeze Module (LLBREZE) Default: F ! LLBREZE = F ! Number of lake breeze regions (NBOX)! NBOX = 0 ! X Grid line 1 defining the region of interest ! XG1 = 0. ! X Grid line 2 defining the region of interest ! XG2 = 0. ! Y Grid line 1 defining the region of interest ! YG1 = 0. ! Y Grid line 2 defining the region of interest ! YG2 = 0. ! X Point defining the coastline (Straight line) (XBCST) (KM) Default: none ! XBCST = 0. ! Y Point defining the coastline (Straight line) (YBCST) (KM) Default: none ! YBCST = 0. ! X Point defining the coastline (Straight line) (XECST) (KM) Default: none ! XECST = 0. ! Y Point defining the coastline (Straight line) (YECST) (KM) Default: none ! YECST = 0. ! Page 446 1. CALMET.INP 13 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor Number of stations in the region Default: none ! NLB = 0 ! (Surface stations + upper air stations) Station ID's in the region (METBXID(NLB)) (Surface stations first, then upper air stations) ! METBXID = 0 ! !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 6 -- Mixing Height, Temperature and Precipitation Parameters -------------- EMPIRICAL MIXING HEIGHT CONSTANTS Neutral, mechanical equation (CONSTB)Default: 1.41 ! CONSTB = 1.41 ! Convective mixing ht. equation (CONSTE)Default: 0.15 ! CONSTE = 0.15 ! Stable mixing ht. equation (CONSTN)Default: 2400. ! CONSTN = 2400.! Overwater mixing ht. equation (CONSTW)Default: 0.16 ! CONSTW = 0.16 ! Absolute value of Coriolis parameter (FCORIOL)Default: 1.E-4 ! FCORIOL = 1.0E-04! Units: (1/s) SPATIAL AVERAGING OF MIXING HEIGHTS Conduct spatial averaging (IAVEZI) (0=no, 1=yes)Default: 1 ! IAVEZI = 1 ! Max. search radius in averaging process (MNMDAV)Default: 1 ! MNMDAV = 10 ! Units: Grid cells Half-angle of upwind looking cone for averaging (HAFANG)Default: 30. ! HAFANG = 30. ! Units: deg. Layer of winds used in upwind averaging (ILEVZI)Default: 1 ! ILEVZI = 1 ! (must be between 1 and NZ) CONVECTIVE MIXING HEIGHT OPTIONS: Method to compute the convective mixing height(IMIHXH)Default: 1 ! IMIXH = 1 ! 1: Maul-Carson for land and water cells -1: Maul-Carson for land cells only - OCD mixing height overwater 2: Batchvarova and Gryning for land and water cells -2: Batchvarova and Gryning for land cells only OCD mixing height overwater Threshold buoyancy flux required to sustain convective mixing height growth overland (THRESHL)Default: 0.0 ! THRESHL = 0.0 ! (expressed as a heat flux units: W/m3 per meter of boundary layer) Threshold buoyancy flux required to sustain convective mixing height growth Page 447 1. CALMET.INP 14 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor overwater (THRESHW)Default: 0.05 ! THRESHW = 0.05 ! (expressed as a heat flux units: W/m3 per meter of boundary layer) Flag to allow relaxation of convective mixing height to equilibrium value when 0<QH<THRESHL (overland) or 0<QH<THRESHW (overwater) (IZICRLX)Default: 1 ! IZICRLX = 1 ! 0 : do NOT use convective mixing height relaxation to equilibrium value (treatment identical to CALMET v5.8) 1 : use convective mixing height relaxation to equilibrium value Relaxation time of convective mixing height to equilibrium value when 0<QH<THRESHL (overland) or 0<QH<THRESHW (overwater) (Used only if IZICRLX = 1 and TZICRLX must be >= 1.) (TZICRLX)Default: 800. ! TZICRLX = 800. ! Units: seconds Option for overwater lapse rates used in convective mixing height growth (ITWPROG)Default: 0 ! ITWPROG = 0 ! 0 : use SEA.DAT lapse rates and deltaT (or assume neutral conditions if missing) 1 : use prognostic lapse rates (only if IPROG>2) and SEA.DAT deltaT (or neutral if missing) 2 : use prognostic lapse rates and prognostic delta T (only if iprog>12 and 3D.DAT version# 2.0 or higher) Land Use category ocean in 3D.DAT datasets (ILUOC3D)Default: 16 ! ILUOC3D = 16 ! Note: if 3D.DAT from MM5 version 3.0, iluoc3d = 16 if MM4.DAT,typically iluoc3d = 7 OTHER MIXING HEIGHT VARIABLES Minimum potential temperature lapse rate in the stable layer above the current convective mixing ht.Default: 0.001 ! DPTMIN = 0.001 ! (DPTMIN)Units: deg. K/m Depth of layer above current conv. mixing height through which lapse Default: 200. ! DZZI = 200. ! rate is computed (DZZI)Units: meters Minimum overland mixing height Default: 50. ! ZIMIN = 50. ! (ZIMIN)Units: meters Maximum overland mixing height Default: 3000. ! ZIMAX = 2500. ! (ZIMAX)Units: meters Minimum overwater mixing height Default: 50. ! ZIMINW = 50. ! (ZIMINW) -- (Not used if observed Units: meters overwater mixing hts. are used) Maximum overwater mixing height Default: 3000. ! ZIMAXW = 2500. ! (ZIMAXW) -- (Not used if observed Units: meters overwater mixing hts. are used) OVERWATER SURFACE FLUXES METHOD and PARAMETERS (ICOARE)Default: 10 ! ICOARE = 10 ! 0: original deltaT method (OCD) 10: COARE with no wave parameterization (jwave=0, Charnock) 11: COARE with wave option jwave=1 (Oost et al.) and default wave properties -11: COARE with wave option jwave=1 (Oost et al.) Page 448 1. CALMET.INP 15 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor and observed wave properties (must be in SEA.DAT files) 12: COARE with wave option 2 (Taylor and Yelland) and default wave properties -12: COARE with wave option 2 (Taylor and Yelland) and observed wave properties (must be in SEA.DAT files) Note: When ICOARE=0, similarity wind profile stability PSI functions based on Van Ulden and Holtslag (1985) are substituted for later formulations used with the COARE module, and temperatures used for surface layer parameters are obtained from either the nearest surface station temperature or prognostic model 2D temperatures (if ITPROG=2). Coastal/Shallow water length scale (DSHELF) (for modified z0 in shallow water) ( COARE fluxes only) Default : 0. ! DSHELF = 0. ! units: km COARE warm layer computation (IWARM)! IWARM = 0 ! 1: on - 0: off (must be off if SST measured with IR radiometer)Default: 0 COARE cool skin layer computation (ICOOL)! ICOOL = 0 ! 1: on - 0: off (must be off if SST measured with IR radiometer)Default: 0 RELATIVE HUMIDITY PARAMETERS 3D relative humidity from observations or from prognostic data? (IRHPROG) Default:0 ! IRHPROG = 0 ! 0 = Use RH from SURF.DAT file (only if NOOBS = 0,1) 1 = Use prognostic RH (only if NOOBS = 0,1,2) TEMPERATURE PARAMETERS 3D temperature from observations or from prognostic data? (ITPROG) Default:0 ! ITPROG = 1 ! 0 = Use Surface and upper air stations (only if NOOBS = 0) 1 = Use Surface stations (no upper air observations) Use MM5/3D for upper air data (only if NOOBS = 0,1) 2 = No surface or upper air observations Use MM5/3D for surface and upper air data (only if NOOBS = 0,1,2) Interpolation type (1 = 1/R ; 2 = 1/R**2)Default:1 ! IRAD = 1 ! Radius of influence for temperature interpolation (TRADKM)Default: 500. ! TRADKM = 20. ! Units: km Maximum Number of stations to include in temperature interpolation (NUMTS) Default: 5 ! NUMTS = 5 ! Conduct spatial averaging of temp- eratures (IAVET) (0=no, 1=yes) Default: 1 ! IAVET = 1 ! Page 449 1. CALMET.INP 16 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor (will use mixing ht MNMDAV,HAFANG so make sure they are correct) Default temperature gradient Default: -.0098 ! TGDEFB = -0.0098 ! below the mixing height over Units: K/m water (TGDEFB) Default temperature gradient Default: -.0045 ! TGDEFA = -0.0045 ! above the mixing height over Units: K/m water (TGDEFA) Beginning (JWAT1) and ending (JWAT2) land use categories for temperature ! JWAT1 = 999 ! interpolation over water -- Make ! JWAT2 = 999 ! bigger than largest land use to disable PRECIP INTERPOLATION PARAMETERS Method of interpolation (NFLAGP) Default: 2 ! NFLAGP = 2 ! (1=1/R,2=1/R**2,3=EXP/R**2) Radius of Influence (SIGMAP)Default: 100.0 ! SIGMAP = 50. ! (0.0 => use half dist. btwn Units: km nearest stns w & w/out precip when NFLAGP = 3) Minimum Precip. Rate Cutoff (CUTP) Default: 0.01 ! CUTP = 0.01 ! (values < CUTP = 0.0 mm/hr)Units: mm/hr !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 7 -- Surface meteorological station parameters -------------- SURFACE STATION VARIABLES (One record per station -- 8 records in all) 1 2 Name ID X coord. Y coord. Time Anem. (km) (km) zone Ht.(m) ---------------------------------------------------------- ! SS1 ='COUR' 111111 680.050 4860.016 5 20 ! ! SS2 ='RUND' 222222 681.958 4861.864 5 7.9 ! ! SS3 ='OSHA' 071697 668.892 4865.761 5 10 ! ! SS4 ='COBO' 071431 728.587 4870.940 5 10 ! ! SS5 ='BUTT' 071639 631.101 4857.709 5 10 ! ! SS6 ='BBTA' 071265 629.393 4831.751 5 10 ! ! SS7 ='YYZA' 071624 610.389 4836.873 5 10 ! ! SS8 ='TREN' 071621 777.397 4890.676 5 10 ! ------------------- 1 Four character string for station name (MUST START IN COLUMN 9) 2 Six digit integer for station ID !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 450 1. CALMET.INP 17 / 17 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor INPUT GROUP: 8 -- Upper air meteorological station parameters -------------- UPPER AIR STATION VARIABLES (One record per station -- 3 records in all) 1 2 Name ID X coord. Y coord. Time zone (km) (km) ----------------------------------------------- ------------------- 1 Four character string for station name (MUST START IN COLUMN 9) 2 Five digit integer for station ID !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 9 -- Precipitation station parameters -------------- PRECIPITATION STATION VARIABLES (One record per station -- 16 records in all) (NOT INCLUDED IF NPSTA = 0) 1 2 Name Station X coord. Y coord. Code (km) (km) ------------------------------------ ------------------- 1 Four character string for station name (MUST START IN COLUMN 9) 2 Six digit station code composed of state code (first 2 digits) and station ID (last 4 digits) !END! Page 451 2. CALPUFF.INP 1 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor CALPUFF.INP 7.0 Groups 0f,0g added; new emission scaling 19117255 DYEC 2021 AQIA CALPUFF Input File for DYEC 2021 Environmental Screening Assessment (140 ktpa scenario - Unit Emission Rate ) ---------------- Run title (3 lines) ------------------------------------------ MODEL: Version TNG SOFTWARE: CALApps v2.0197 (Beta) - September 22, 2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALPUFF MODEL CONTROL FILE -------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 0 -- Input and Output File Names -------------- Default Name Type File Name ------------ ------------- CALMET.DAT input * METDAT =* or ISCMET.DAT input * ISCDAT =* or PLMMET.DAT input * PLMDAT =* or PROFILE.DAT input * PRFDAT =* SURFACE.DAT input * SFCDAT =* RESTARTB.DAT input * RSTARTB=* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALPUFF.LST output ! PUFLST =CALPUFF.LST ! CONC.DAT output ! CONDAT =CALPUFF.CON ! DFLX.DAT output * DFDAT =* WFLX.DAT output * WFDAT =* VISB.DAT output * VISDAT =* TK2D.DAT output * T2DDAT =* RHO2D.DAT output * RHODAT =* RESTARTE.DAT output * RSTARTE=* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Files ----------- OZONE.DAT input * OZDAT = * VD.DAT input * VDDAT =* CHEM.DAT input * CHEMDAT=* AUX input ! AUXEXT = aux! (Extension added to METDAT filename(s) for files with auxiliary 2D and 3D data) H2O2.DAT input * H2O2DAT=* NH3Z.DAT input * NH3ZDAT=* HILL.DAT input * HILDAT=* HILLRCT.DAT input * RCTDAT=* COASTLN.DAT input ! CSTDAT=../../COAST-V2.DAT ! FLUXBDY.DAT input * BDYDAT=* BCON.DAT input * BCNDAT=* DEBUG.DAT output * DEBUG =* MASSFLX.DAT output * FLXDAT=* MASSBAL.DAT output * BALDAT=* FOG.DAT output * FOGDAT=* RISE.DAT output * RISDAT=* PFTRAK.DAT output * TRKDAT=* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All file names will be converted to lower case if LCFILES = T Otherwise, if LCFILES = F, file names will be converted to UPPER CASE T = lower case ! LCFILES = F ! F = UPPER CASE Page 452 2. CALPUFF.INP 2 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor NOTE: (1) file/path names can be up to 132 characters in length Provision for multiple CALMET Domains and files ----------------------------------------------------- Number of CALMET.DAT Domains (NMETDOM) Default: 1 ! NMETDOM = 1 ! Number of CALMET.DAT files (NMETDAT) (Total for ALL Domains) Default: 1 ! NMETDAT = 12 ! Variable point/area/volume/flare emissions input files ------------------------------------------------------- Number of POINT source files (PTEMARB.DAT) with time-varying data (NPTDAT) Default: 0 ! NPTDAT = 0 ! Number of BUOYANT AREA source files (BAEMARB.DAT) with time-varying data (NARDAT) Default: 0 ! NARDAT = 0 ! Number of VOLUME source files (VOLEMARB.DAT) with time-varying data (NVOLDAT) Default: 0 ! NVOLDAT = 0 ! Number of FLARE source files (FLEMARB.DAT) with time-varying data (NFLDAT) Default: 0 ! NFLDAT = 0 ! Number of ROAD source files (RDEMARB.DAT) with time-varying data (NRDDAT) Default: 0 ! NRDDAT = 0 ! Number of BUOYANT LINE source files (LNEMARB.DAT) with time-varying data (NLNDAT) Default: 0 ! NLNDAT = 0 ! Note: Only 1 BUOYANT LINE source file is allowed ----- !END! ------------- Subgroup (0a) ------------- Provide a name for each CALMET domain if NMETDOM > 1 Enter NMETDOM lines. a,b Default Name Domain Name ------------------------ none * DOMAIN1= * *END* none * DOMAIN2= * *END* none * DOMAIN3= * *END* The following CALMET.DAT filenames are processed in sequence if NMETDAT > 1 Enter NMETDAT lines, 1 line for each file name. a,c,d Default Name Type File Name Page 453 2. CALPUFF.INP 3 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor ------------ ------------- none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_W1.DAT! !END! none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_W2.DAT! !END! none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_SP3.DAT! !END! none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_SP4.DAT! !END! none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_SP5.DAT! !END! none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_SU6.DAT! !END! none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_SU7.DAT! !END! none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_SU8.DAT! !END! none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_F9.DAT! !END! none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_F10.DAT! !END! none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_F11.DAT! !END! none input ! METDAT=../CALMET_W12.DAT! !END! ------------- a The name for each CALMET domain and each CALMET.DAT file is treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b Use DOMAIN1= to assign the name for the outermost CALMET domain. Use DOMAIN2= to assign the name for the next inner CALMET domain. Use DOMAIN3= to assign the name for the next inner CALMET domain, etc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- | When inner domains with equal resolution (grid-cell size) | | overlap, the data from the FIRST such domain in the list will | | be used if all other criteria for choosing the controlling | | grid domain are inconclusive.| -------------------------------------------------------------------- c Use METDAT1= to assign the file names for the outermost CALMET domain. Use METDAT2= to assign the file names for the next inner CALMET domain. Use METDAT3= to assign the file names for the next inner CALMET domain, etc. d The filenames for each domain must be provided in sequential order ------------- Subgroup (0b) – PTEMARB.DAT files ------------- POINT Source File Names The following PTEMARB.DAT filenames are processed if NPTDAT>0 A total of NPTDAT lines is expected with one file name assigned per line Each line is treated as an input group and must terminate with END (surrounded by delimiters) (Each file contains emissions parameters for the entire period modeled for 1 or more sources) Default Name Type File Name ------------ ------------- none input * PTDAT= * *END* ------------- Subgroup (0c) – BAEMARB.DAT files ------------- BUOYANT AREA Source File Names The following BAEMARB.DAT filenames are processed if NARDAT>0 A total of NARDAT lines is expected with one file name assigned per line Each line is treated as an input group and must terminate with END (surrounded by delimiters) (Each file contains emissions parameters for the entire period modeled for 1 or more sources) Page 454 2. CALPUFF.INP 4 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor Default Name Type File Name ------------ ------------- none input * ARDAT= * *END* ------------- Subgroup (0d) – VOLEMARB.DAT files ------------- VOLUME Source File Names The following VOLEMARB.DAT filenames are processed if NVOLDAT>0 A total of NVOLDAT lines is expected with one file name assigned per line Each line is treated as an input group and must terminate with END (surrounded by delimiters) (Each file contains emissions parameters for the entire period modeled for 1 or more sources) Default Name Type File Name ------------ ------------- none input * VOLDAT= * *END* ------------- Subgroup (0e) – FLEMARB.DAT files ------------- FLARE Source File Names The following FLEMARB.DAT filenames are processed if NFLDAT>0 A total of NFLDAT lines is expected with one file name assigned per line Each line is treated as an input group and must terminate with END (surrounded by delimiters) (Each file contains emissions parameters for the entire period modeled for 1 or more sources) Default Name Type File Name ------------ ------------- none input * FLDAT= * *END* ------------- Subgroup (0f) – RDEMARB.DAT files ------------- ROAD Source File Names The following RDEMARB.DAT filenames are processed if NRDDAT>0 A total of NRDDAT lines is expected with one file name assigned per line Each line is treated as an input group and must terminate with END (surrounded by delimiters) (Each file contains emissions parameters for the entire period modeled for 1 or more sources) Default Name Type File Name ------------ ------------- none input * RDDAT= * *END* ------------- Subgroup (0g) – LNEMARB.DAT file ------------- BUOYANT LINE Source File Name (not more than 1) The following LNEMARB.DAT filename is processed if NLNDAT>0 The assignment is treated as an input group and must terminate with END (surrounded by delimiters) Default Name Type File Name Page 455 2. CALPUFF.INP 5 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor ------------ ------------- LNEMARB.DAT input * LNDAT= * *END* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 1 -- General run control parameters -------------- Option to run all periods found in the met. file (METRUN) Default: 0 ! METRUN = 0 ! METRUN = 0 - Run period explicitly defined below METRUN = 1 - Run all periods in met. file Starting date: Year (IBYR) -- No default ! IBYR = 2014 ! Month (IBMO) -- No default ! IBMO = 1 ! Day (IBDY) -- No default ! IBDY = 1 ! Starting time: Hour (IBHR) -- No default ! IBHR = 0 ! Minute (IBMIN) -- No default ! IBMIN = 0 ! Second (IBSEC) -- No default ! IBSEC = 0 ! Ending date: Year (IEYR) -- No default ! IEYR = 2014 ! Month (IEMO) -- No default ! IEMO = 12 ! Day (IEDY) -- No default ! IEDY = 31 ! Ending time: Hour (IEHR) -- No default ! IEHR = 24 ! Minute (IEMIN) -- No default ! IEMIN = 0 ! Second (IESEC) -- No default ! IESEC = 0 ! (These are only used if METRUN = 0) Base time zone:(ABTZ) -- No default ! ABTZ= UTC-0500 ! (character*8) The modeling domain may span multiple time zones. ABTZ defines the base time zone used for the entire simulation. This must match the base time zone of the meteorological data. Examples: Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) = UTC+0000 EST = UTC-0500 CST = UTC-0600 MST = UTC-0700 PST = UTC-0800 Los Angeles, USA = UTC-0800 New York, USA = UTC-0500 Santiago, Chile = UTC-0400 UK = UTC+0000 Western Europe = UTC+0100 Rome, Italy = UTC+0100 Cape Town, S.Africa = UTC+0200 Sydney, Australia = UTC+1000 Length of modeling time-step (seconds) Equal to update period in the primary meteorological data files, or an integer fraction of it (1/2, 1/3 ...) Must be no larger than 1 hour (NSECDT)Default:3600 ! NSECDT = 3600 ! Units: seconds Number of chemical species (NSPEC) Default: 5 ! NSPEC = 1 ! Number of chemical species to be emitted (NSE)Default: 3 ! NSE = 1 ! Flag to stop run after Page 456 2. CALPUFF.INP 6 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor SETUP phase (ITEST)Default: 2 ! ITEST = 2 ! (Used to allow checking of the model inputs, files, etc.) ITEST = 1 - STOPS program after SETUP phase ITEST = 2 - Continues with execution of program after SETUP Restart Configuration: Control flag (MRESTART) Default: 0 ! MRESTART = 0 ! 0 = Do not read or write a restart file 1 = Read a restart file at the beginning of the run 2 = Write a restart file during run 3 = Read a restart file at beginning of run and write a restart file during run Number of periods in Restart output cycle (NRESPD) Default: 0 ! NRESPD = 0 ! 0 = File written only at last period >0 = File updated every NRESPD periods Meteorological Data Format (METFM) Default: 1 ! METFM = 1 ! METFM = 1 - CALMET binary file (CALMET.MET) METFM = 2 - ISC ASCII file (ISCMET.MET) METFM = 3 - AUSPLUME ASCII file (PLMMET.MET) METFM = 4 - CTDM plus tower file (PROFILE.DAT) and surface parameters file (SURFACE.DAT) METFM = 5 - AERMET tower file (PROFILE.DAT) and surface parameters file (SURFACE.DAT) Meteorological Profile Data Format (MPRFFM) (used only for METFM = 1, 2, 3) Default: 1 ! MPRFFM = 1 ! MPRFFM = 1 - CTDM plus tower file (PROFILE.DAT) MPRFFM = 2 - AERMET tower file (PROFILE.DAT) Sigma-y is adjusted by the factor (AVET/PGTIME)**0.2 to either decrease it if the averaging time selected is less than the base averaging time, or increase it if the averaging time is greater. The base averaging time is denoted as PGTIME due to historical reasons as this adjustment was originally applied to the PG sigma option. It is now applied to all dispersion options. The factor is applied to the ambient turbulence sigma-v (m/s) and does not alter buoyancy enhancement or far-field Heffter growth. Averaging Time (minutes) (AVET) Default: 60.0 ! AVET = 60. ! Base Averaging Time (minutes) (PGTIME) Default: 60.0 ! PGTIME = 60. ! Output units for binary concentration and flux files written in Dataset v2.2 or later formats (IOUTU)Default: 1 ! IOUTU = 1 ! 1 = mass - g/m3 (conc) or g/m2/s (dep) 2 = odour - odour_units (conc) 3 = radiation - Bq/m3 (conc) or Bq/m2/s (dep) Page 457 2. CALPUFF.INP 7 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 2 -- Technical options -------------- Vertical distribution used in the near field (MGAUSS)Default: 1 ! MGAUSS = 1 ! 0 = uniform 1 = Gaussian Terrain adjustment method (MCTADJ)Default: 3 ! MCTADJ = 3 ! 0 = no adjustment 1 = ISC-type of terrain adjustment 2 = simple, CALPUFF-type of terrain adjustment 3 = partial plume path adjustment Subgrid-scale complex terrain flag (MCTSG)Default: 0 ! MCTSG = 0 ! 0 = not modeled 1 = modeled Near-field puffs modeled as elongated slugs? (MSLUG)Default: 0 ! MSLUG = 0 ! 0 = no 1 = yes (slug model used) Transitional plume rise modeled? (MTRANS)Default: 1 ! MTRANS = 1 ! 0 = no (i.e., final rise only) 1 = yes (i.e., transitional rise computed) Stack tip downwash? (MTIP)Default: 1 ! MTIP = 1 ! 0 = no (i.e., no stack tip downwash) 1 = yes (i.e., use stack tip downwash) Method used to compute plume rise for point sources not subject to building downwash? (MRISE)Default: 1 ! MRISE = 1 ! 1 = Briggs plume rise 2 = Numerical plume rise Apply stack-tip downwash to FLARE sources? (MTIP_FL)Default: 0 ! MTIP_FL = 0 ! 0 = no (no stack-tip downwash) 1 = yes (apply stack-tip downwash) Plume rise module for FLARE sources (MRISE_FL)Default: 2 ! MRISE_FL = 2 ! 1 = Briggs module 2 = Numerical rise module Method used to simulate building downwash? (MBDW)Default: 1 ! MBDW = 2 ! 1 = ISC method 2 = PRIME method Vertical wind shear modeled above stack top (modified Briggs plume rise)? (MSHEAR)Default: 0 ! MSHEAR = 0 ! 0 = no (i.e., vertical wind shear not modeled) Page 458 2. CALPUFF.INP 8 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1 = yes (i.e., vertical wind shear modeled) Puff splitting allowed? (MSPLIT) Default: 0 ! MSPLIT = 0 ! 0 = no (i.e., puffs not split) 1 = yes (i.e., puffs are split) Chemical mechanism flag (MCHEM) Default: 1 ! MCHEM = 0 ! 0 = chemical transformation not modeled 1 = transformation rates computed internally (MESOPUFF II scheme) 2 = user-specified transformation rates used 3 = transformation rates computed internally (RIVAD/ARM3 scheme) 4 = secondary organic aerosol formation computed (MESOPUFF II scheme for OH) 5 = user-specified half-life with or without transfer to child species 6 = transformation rates computed internally (Updated RIVAD scheme with ISORROPIA equilibrium) 7 = transformation rates computed internally (Updated RIVAD scheme with ISORROPIA equilibrium and CalTech SOA) Aqueous phase transformation flag (MAQCHEM) (Used only if MCHEM = 6, or 7) Default: 0 ! MAQCHEM = 0 ! 0 = aqueous phase transformation not modeled 1 = transformation rates and wet scavenging coefficients adjusted for in-cloud aqueous phase reactions (adapted from RADM cloud model implementation in CMAQ/SCICHEM) Liquid Water Content flag (MLWC) (Used only if MAQCHEM = 1)Default: 1 ! MLWC = 1 ! 0 = water content estimated from cloud cover and presence of precipitation 1 = gridded cloud water data read from CALMET water content output files (filenames are the CALMET.DAT names PLUS the extension AUXEXT provided in Input Group 0) Wet removal modeled ? (MWET)Default: 1 ! MWET = 0 ! 0 = no 1 = yes Dry deposition modeled ? (MDRY) Default: 1 ! MDRY = 0 ! 0 = no 1 = yes (dry deposition method specified for each species in Input Group 3) Gravitational settling (plume tilt) modeled ? (MTILT)Default: 0 ! MTILT = 0 ! 0 = no 1 = yes (puff center falls at the gravitational settling velocity for 1 particle species) Restrictions: - MDRY = 1 - NSPEC = 1 (must be particle species as well) Page 459 2. CALPUFF.INP 9 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor - sg = 0 GEOMETRIC STANDARD DEVIATION in Group 8 is set to zero for a single particle diameter Method used to compute dispersion coefficients (MDISP)Default: 3 ! MDISP = 2 ! 1 = dispersion coefficients computed from measured values of turbulence, sigma v, sigma w 2 = dispersion coefficients from internally calculated sigma v, sigma w using micrometeorological variables (u*, w*, L, etc.) 3 = PG dispersion coefficients for RURAL areas (computed using the ISCST multi-segment approximation) and MP coefficients in urban areas 4 = same as 3 except PG coefficients computed using the MESOPUFF II eqns. 5 = CTDM sigmas used for stable and neutral conditions. For unstable conditions, sigmas are computed as in MDISP = 3, described above. MDISP = 5 assumes that measured values are read Sigma-v/sigma-theta, sigma-w measurements used? (MTURBVW) (Used only if MDISP = 1 or 5)Default: 3 ! MTURBVW = 3 ! 1 = use sigma-v or sigma-theta measurements from PROFILE.DAT to compute sigma-y (valid for METFM = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) 2 = use sigma-w measurements from PROFILE.DAT to compute sigma-z (valid for METFM = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) 3 = use both sigma-(v/theta) and sigma-w from PROFILE.DAT to compute sigma-y and sigma-z (valid for METFM = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) 4 = use sigma-theta measurements from PLMMET.DAT to compute sigma-y (valid only if METFM = 3) Back-up method used to compute dispersion when measured turbulence data are missing (MDISP2)Default: 3 ! MDISP2 = 3 ! (used only if MDISP = 1 or 5) 2 = dispersion coefficients from internally calculated sigma v, sigma w using micrometeorological variables (u*, w*, L, etc.) 3 = PG dispersion coefficients for RURAL areas (computed using the ISCST multi-segment approximation) and MP coefficients in urban areas 4 = same as 3 except PG coefficients computed using the MESOPUFF II eqns. [DIAGNOSTIC FEATURE] Method used for Lagrangian timescale for Sigma-y (used only if MDISP=1,2 or MDISP2=1,2) (MTAULY)Default: 0 ! MTAULY = 0 ! 0 = Draxler default 617.284 (s) 1 = Computed as Lag. Length / (.75 q) -- after SCIPUFF 10 < Direct user input (s)-- e.g., 306.9 [DIAGNOSTIC FEATURE] Method used for Advective-Decay timescale for Turbulence (used only if MDISP=2 or MDISP2=2) (MTAUADV)Default: 0 ! MTAUADV = 0 ! 0 = No turbulence advection 1 = Computed (OPTION NOT IMPLEMENTED) 10 < Direct user input (s) -- e.g., 800 Page 460 2. CALPUFF.INP 10 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor Method used to compute turbulence sigma-v & sigma-w using micrometeorological variables (Used only if MDISP = 2 or MDISP2 = 2) (MCTURB)Default: 1 ! MCTURB = 1 ! 1 = Standard CALPUFF subroutines 2 = AERMOD subroutines PG sigma-y,z adj. for roughness? Default: 0 ! MROUGH = 0 ! (MROUGH) 0 = no 1 = yes Partial plume penetration of Default: 1 ! MPARTL = 1 ! elevated inversion modeled for point sources? (MPARTL) 0 = no 1 = yes Partial plume penetration of Default: 1 ! MPARTLBA = 1 ! elevated inversion modeled for buoyant area sources? (MPARTLBA) 0 = no 1 = yes Strength of temperature inversion Default: 0 ! MTINV = 0 ! provided in PROFILE.DAT extended records? (MTINV) 0 = no (computed from measured/default gradients) 1 = yes PDF used for dispersion under convective conditions? Default: 0 ! MPDF = 1 ! (MPDF) 0 = no 1 = yes Sub-Grid TIBL module used for shore line? Default: 0 ! MSGTIBL = 1 ! (MSGTIBL) 0 = no 1 = yes Boundary conditions (concentration) modeled? Default: 0 ! MBCON = 0 ! (MBCON) 0 = no 1 = yes, using formatted BCON.DAT file 2 = yes, using unformatted CONC.DAT file Note: MBCON > 0 requires that the last species modeled be 'BCON'. Mass is placed in species BCON when generating boundary condition puffs so that clean air entering the modeling domain can be simulated in the same way as polluted air. Specify zero emission of species BCON for all regular sources. Individual source contributions saved? Default: 0 ! MSOURCE = 0 ! (MSOURCE) 0 = no 1 = yes Page 461 2. CALPUFF.INP 11 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor Analyses of fogging and icing impacts due to emissions from arrays of mechanically-forced cooling towers can be performed using CALPUFF in conjunction with a cooling tower emissions processor (CTEMISS) and its associated postprocessors. Hourly emissions of water vapor and temperature from each cooling tower cell are computed for the current cell configuration and ambient conditions by CTEMISS. CALPUFF models the dispersion of these emissions and provides cloud information in a specialized format for further analysis. Output to FOG.DAT is provided in either 'plume mode' or 'receptor mode' format. Configure for FOG Model output? Default: 0 ! MFOG = 0 ! (MFOG) 0 = no 1 = yes - report results in PLUME Mode format 2 = yes - report results in RECEPTOR Mode format Test options specified to see if they conform to regulatory values? (MREG)Default: 1 ! MREG = 0 ! 0 = NO checks are made 1 = Technical options must conform to USEPA Long Range Transport (LRT) guidance METFM 1 or 2 AVET 60. (min) PGTIME 60. (min) MGAUSS 1 MCTADJ 3 MTRANS 1 MTIP 1 MRISE 1 MCHEM 1 or 3 (if modeling SOx, NOx) MWET 1 MDRY 1 MDISP 2 or 3 MPDF 0 if MDISP=3 1 if MDISP=2 MROUGH 0 MPARTL 1 MPARTLBA 0 SYTDEP 550. (m) MHFTSZ 0 SVMIN 0.5 (m/s) !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 3a, 3b -- Species list ------------------- ------------ Subgroup (3a) ------------ The following species are modeled: ! CSPEC =UNIT !!END! Dry OUTPUT GROUP Page 462 2. CALPUFF.INP 12 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor SPECIES MODELED EMITTED DEPOSITED NUMBER NAME (0=NO, 1=YES) (0=NO, 1=YES) (0=NO,(0=NONE, (Limit: 12 1=COMPUTED-GAS 1=1st CGRUP, Characters 2=COMPUTED-PARTICLE 2=2nd CGRUP, in length)3=USER-SPECIFIED) 3= etc.) !UNIT =1,1,0,0 ! !END! Note: The last species in (3a) must be 'BCON' when using the boundary condition option (MBCON > 0). Species BCON should typically be modeled as inert (no chem transformation or removal). ------------- Subgroup (3b) ------------- The following names are used for Species-Groups in which results for certain species are combined (added) prior to output. The CGRUP name will be used as the species name in output files. Use this feature to model specific particle-size distributions by treating each size-range as a separate species. Order must be consistent with 3(a) above. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 4 -- Map Projection and Grid control parameters -------------- Projection for all (X,Y): ------------------------- Map projection (PMAP)Default: UTM ! PMAP = UTM ! UTM : Universal Transverse Mercator TTM : Tangential Transverse Mercator LCC : Lambert Conformal Conic PS : Polar Stereographic EM : Equatorial Mercator LAZA : Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area False Easting and Northing (km) at the projection origin (Used only if PMAP= TTM, LCC, or LAZA) (FEAST)Default=0.0 ! FEAST = 0.000 ! (FNORTH)Default=0.0 ! FNORTH = 0.000 ! UTM zone (1 to 60) (Used only if PMAP=UTM) (IUTMZN)No Default ! IUTMZN = 17 ! Hemisphere for UTM projection? (Used only if PMAP=UTM) (UTMHEM)Default: N ! UTMHEM = N ! N : Northern hemisphere projection S : Southern hemisphere projection Latitude and Longitude (decimal degrees) of projection origin (Used only if PMAP= TTM, LCC, PS, EM, or LAZA) (RLAT0)No Default ! RLAT0 = 0N ! Page 463 2. CALPUFF.INP 13 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor (RLON0)No Default ! RLON0 = 0E ! TTM : RLON0 identifies central (true N/S) meridian of projection RLAT0 selected for convenience LCC : RLON0 identifies central (true N/S) meridian of projection RLAT0 selected for convenience PS : RLON0 identifies central (grid N/S) meridian of projection RLAT0 selected for convenience EM : RLON0 identifies central meridian of projection RLAT0 is REPLACED by 0.0N (Equator) LAZA: RLON0 identifies longitude of tangent-point of mapping plane RLAT0 identifies latitude of tangent-point of mapping plane Matching parallel(s) of latitude (decimal degrees) for projection (Used only if PMAP= LCC or PS) (XLAT1)No Default ! XLAT1 = 0N ! (XLAT2)No Default ! XLAT2 = 0N ! LCC : Projection cone slices through Earth's surface at XLAT1 and XLAT2 PS : Projection plane slices through Earth at XLAT1 (XLAT2 is not used) ---------- Note: Latitudes and longitudes should be positive, and include a letter N,S,E, or W indicating north or south latitude, and east or west longitude. For example, 35.9 N Latitude = 35.9N 118.7 E Longitude = 118.7E Datum-region ------------ The Datum-Region for the coordinates is identified by a character string. Many mapping products currently available use the model of the Earth known as the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS-84). Other local models may be in use, and their selection in CALMET will make its output consistent with local mapping products. The list of Datum-Regions with official transformation parameters is provided by the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA). NIMA Datum - Regions(Examples) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WGS-84 WGS-84 Reference Ellipsoid and Geoid, Global coverage (WGS84) NAS-C NORTH AMERICAN 1927 Clarke 1866 Spheroid, MEAN FOR CONUS (NAD27) NAR-C NORTH AMERICAN 1983 GRS 80 Spheroid, MEAN FOR CONUS (NAD83) NWS-84 NWS 6370KM Radius, Sphere ESR-S ESRI REFERENCE 6371KM Radius, Sphere Datum-region for output coordinates (DATUM)Default: WGS-84 ! DATUM = WGS-84 ! METEOROLOGICAL Grid (outermost if nested CALMET grids are used): Rectangular grid defined for projection PMAP, with X the Easting and Y the Northing coordinate No. X grid cells (NX) No default ! NX = 160 ! No. Y grid cells (NY) No default ! NY = 160 ! No. vertical layers (NZ) No default ! NZ = 8 ! Grid spacing (DGRIDKM) No default ! DGRIDKM = 0.25 ! Units: km Cell face heights Page 464 2. CALPUFF.INP 14 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor (ZFACE(nz+1)) No defaults Units: m ! ZFACE = .0, 20.0, 50.0, 100.0, 200.0, 500.0, 1000.0, 2000.0, 3300.0 ! Reference Coordinates of SOUTHWEST corner of grid cell(1, 1): X coordinate (XORIGKM) No default ! XORIGKM = 662.536 ! Y coordinate (YORIGKM) No default ! YORIGKM = 4845.0 ! Units: km COMPUTATIONAL Grid: The computational grid is identical to or a subset of the MET. grid. The lower left (LL) corner of the computational grid is at grid point (IBCOMP, JBCOMP) of the MET. grid. The upper right (UR) corner of the computational grid is at grid point (IECOMP, JECOMP) of the MET. grid. The grid spacing of the computational grid is the same as the MET. grid. X index of LL corner (IBCOMP) No default ! IBCOMP = 1 ! (1 <= IBCOMP <= NX) Y index of LL corner (JBCOMP) No default ! JBCOMP = 1 ! (1 <= JBCOMP <= NY) X index of UR corner (IECOMP) No default ! IECOMP = 160 ! (1 <= IECOMP <= NX) Y index of UR corner (JECOMP) No default ! JECOMP = 160 ! (1 <= JECOMP <= NY) SAMPLING Grid (GRIDDED RECEPTORS): The lower left (LL) corner of the sampling grid is at grid point (IBSAMP, JBSAMP) of the MET. grid. The upper right (UR) corner of the sampling grid is at grid point (IESAMP, JESAMP) of the MET. grid. The sampling grid must be identical to or a subset of the computational grid. It may be a nested grid inside the computational grid. The grid spacing of the sampling grid is DGRIDKM/MESHDN. Logical flag indicating if gridded receptors are used (LSAMP)Default: T ! LSAMP = F ! (T=yes, F=no) X index of LL corner (IBSAMP) No default ! IBSAMP = 0 ! (IBCOMP <= IBSAMP <= IECOMP) Y index of LL corner (JBSAMP) No default ! JBSAMP = 0 ! (JBCOMP <= JBSAMP <= JECOMP) X index of UR corner (IESAMP) No default ! IESAMP = 0 ! (IBCOMP <= IESAMP <= IECOMP) Y index of UR corner (JESAMP) No default ! JESAMP = 0 ! (JBCOMP <= JESAMP <= JECOMP) Nesting factor of the sampling grid (MESHDN)Default: 1 ! MESHDN = 1 ! (MESHDN is an integer >= 1) Page 465 2. CALPUFF.INP 15 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 5 -- Output Options -------------- ** FILE DEFAULT VALUE VALUE THIS RUN ------------------------------- Concentrations (ICON)1 ! ICON = 1 ! Dry Fluxes (IDRY)1 ! IDRY = 0 ! Wet Fluxes (IWET)1 ! IWET = 0 ! 2D Temperature (IT2D)0 ! IT2D = 0 ! 2D Density (IRHO)0 ! IRHO = 0 ! Relative Humidity (IVIS)1 ! IVIS = 0 ! (relative humidity file is required for visibility analysis) Use data compression option in output file? (LCOMPRS)Default: T ! LCOMPRS = T ! * 0 = Do not create file, 1 = create file QA PLOT FILE OUTPUT OPTION: Create a standard series of output files (e.g. locations of sources, receptors, grids ...) suitable for plotting? (IQAPLOT)Default: 1 ! IQAPLOT = 1 ! 0 = no 1 = yes DIAGNOSTIC PUFF-TRACKING OUTPUT OPTION: Puff locations and properties reported to PFTRAK.DAT file for postprocessing? (IPFTRAK)Default: 0 ! IPFTRAK = 0 ! 0 = no 1 = yes, update puff output at end of each timestep 2 = yes, update puff output at end of each sampling step DIAGNOSTIC MASS FLUX OUTPUT OPTIONS: Mass flux across specified boundaries for selected species reported? (IMFLX)Default: 0 ! IMFLX = 0 ! 0 = no 1 = yes (FLUXBDY.DAT and MASSFLX.DAT filenames are specified in Input Group 0) Mass balance for each species reported? (IMBAL)Default: 0 ! IMBAL = 0 ! 0 = no 1 = yes (MASSBAL.DAT filename is specified in Input Group 0) NUMERICAL RISE OUTPUT OPTION: Page 466 2. CALPUFF.INP 16 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor Create a file with plume properties for each rise increment, for each model timestep? This applies to sources modeled with numerical rise and is limited to ONE source in the run. (INRISE)Default: 0 ! INRISE = 0 ! 0 = no 1 = yes (RISE.DAT filename is specified in Input Group 0) LINE PRINTER OUTPUT OPTIONS: Print concentrations (ICPRT) Default: 0 ! ICPRT = 1 ! Print dry fluxes (IDPRT) Default: 0 ! IDPRT = 0 ! Print wet fluxes (IWPRT) Default: 0 ! IWPRT = 0 ! (0 = Do not print, 1 = Print) Concentration print interval (ICFRQ) in timesteps Default: 1 ! ICFRQ = 1 ! Dry flux print interval (IDFRQ) in timesteps Default: 1 ! IDFRQ = 1 ! Wet flux print interval (IWFRQ) in timesteps Default: 1 ! IWFRQ = 1 ! Units for Line Printer Output (IPRTU)Default: 1 ! IPRTU = 3 ! for for Concentration Deposition 1 = g/m**3 g/m**2/s 2 = mg/m**3 mg/m**2/s 3 = ug/m**3 ug/m**2/s 4 = ng/m**3 ng/m**2/s 5 = Odour Units 6 = TBq/m**3 TBq/m**2/s TBq=terabecquerel 7 = GBq/m**3 GBq/m**2/s GBq=gigabecquerel 8 = Bq/m**3 Bq/m**2/s Bq=becquerel (disintegrations/s) Messages tracking progress of run written to the screen ? (IMESG)Default: 2 ! IMESG = 2 ! 0 = no 1 = yes (advection step, puff ID) 2 = yes (YYYYJJJHH, # old puffs, # emitted puffs) SPECIES (or GROUP for combined species) LIST FOR OUTPUT OPTIONS ---- CONCENTRATIONS ---- ------ DRY FLUXES ------ ------ WET FLUXES --- --- -- MASS FLUX -- SPECIES /GROUP PRINTED? SAVED ON DISK? PRINTED? SAVED ON DISK? PRINTED? SAVED ON DISK? SAVED ON DISK? ------- ------------------------ ------------------------ ---------------0----- --- --------------- !UNIT = 1,1,0,0,0,0, 0 ! Note: Species BCON (for MBCON > 0) does not need to be saved on disk. OPTIONS FOR PRINTING "DEBUG" QUANTITIES (much output) Logical for debug output (LDEBUG)Default: F ! LDEBUG = F ! Page 467 2. CALPUFF.INP 17 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor First puff to track (IPFDEB)Default: 1 ! IPFDEB = 1 ! Number of puffs to track (NPFDEB)Default: 1 ! NPFDEB = 1 ! Met. period to start output (NN1)Default: 1 ! NN1 = 1 ! Met. period to end output (NN2)Default: 10 ! NN2 = 10 ! !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 6a, 6b, & 6c -- Subgrid scale complex terrain inputs ------------------------- --------------- Subgroup (6a) --------------- Number of terrain features (NHILL) Default: 0 ! NHILL = 0 ! Number of special complex terrain receptors (NCTREC)Default: 0 ! NCTREC = 0 ! Terrain and CTSG Receptor data for CTSG hills input in CTDM format ? (MHILL)No Default ! MHILL = 2 ! 1 = Hill and Receptor data created by CTDM processors & read from HILL.DAT and HILLRCT.DAT files 2 = Hill data created by OPTHILL & input below in Subgroup (6b); Receptor data in Subgroup (6c) Factor to convert horizontal dimensions Default: 1.0 ! XHILL2M = 1.0 ! to meters (MHILL=1) Factor to convert vertical dimensions Default: 1.0 ! ZHILL2M = 1.0 ! to meters (MHILL=1) X-origin of CTDM system relative to No Default ! XCTDMKM = 0 ! CALPUFF coordinate system, in Kilometers (MHILL=1) Y-origin of CTDM system relative to No Default ! YCTDMKM = 0 ! CALPUFF coordinate system, in Kilometers (MHILL=1) ! END ! --------------- Subgroup (6b) --------------- 1 ** HILL information HILL XC YC THETAH ZGRID RELIEF EXPO 1 EXPO 2 SCALE 1 SCALE 2 AMAX1 AMAX2 NO.(km) (km) (deg.) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) ( m) (m) (m) -------- ---- ------ ----- ------ ------ ------ ------- --- Page 468 2. CALPUFF.INP 18 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor ---- ----- ----- --------------- Subgroup (6c) --------------- COMPLEX TERRAIN RECEPTOR INFORMATION XRCT YRCT ZRCT XHH (km)(km)(m) ------ ----- ---------- ------------------- 1 Description of Complex Terrain Variables: XC, YC = Coordinates of center of hill THETAH = Orientation of major axis of hill (clockwise from North) ZGRID = Height of the 0 of the grid above mean sea level RELIEF = Height of the crest of the hill above the grid elevation EXPO 1 = Hill-shape exponent for the major axis EXPO 2 = Hill-shape exponent for the major axis SCALE 1 = Horizontal length scale along the major axis SCALE 2 = Horizontal length scale along the minor axis AMAX = Maximum allowed axis length for the major axis BMAX = Maximum allowed axis length for the major axis XRCT, YRCT = Coordinates of the complex terrain receptors ZRCT = Height of the ground (MSL) at the complex terrain Receptor XHH = Hill number associated with each complex terrain receptor (NOTE: MUST BE ENTERED AS A REAL NUMBER) ** NOTE: DATA for each hill and CTSG receptor are treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 7 -- Chemical parameters for dry deposition of gases -------------- SPECIES DIFFUSIVITY ALPHA STAR REACTIVITY MESOPHYLL RESISTANCE HENRY'S LAW COEFFICIENT NAME (cm**2/s)(s/cm) (dimensionless) ------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -------------------- -- --------------------- !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 8 -- Size parameters for dry deposition of particles -------------- For SINGLE SPECIES, the mean and standard deviation are used to compute a deposition velocity for NINT (see group 9) size-ranges, and these are then averaged to obtain a mean deposition velocity. Page 469 2. CALPUFF.INP 19 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor For GROUPED SPECIES, the size distribution should be explicitly specified (by the 'species' in the group), and the standard deviation for each should be entered as 0. The model will then use the deposition velocity for the stated mean diameter. SPECIES GEOMETRIC MASS MEAN GEOMETRIC STANDARD NAME DIAMETER DEVIATION (microns)(microns) ------- ------------------- ------------------ !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 9 -- Miscellaneous dry deposition parameters -------------- Reference cuticle resistance (s/cm) (RCUTR)Default: 30 ! RCUTR = 30.0 ! Reference ground resistance (s/cm) (RGR)Default: 10 ! RGR = 10.0 ! Reference pollutant reactivity (REACTR)Default: 8 ! REACTR = 8.0 ! Number of particle-size intervals used to evaluate effective particle deposition velocity (NINT)Default: 9 ! NINT = 9 ! Vegetation state in unirrigated areas (IVEG)Default: 1 ! IVEG = 1 ! IVEG=1 for active and unstressed vegetation IVEG=2 for active and stressed vegetation IVEG=3 for inactive vegetation !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 10 -- Wet Deposition Parameters --------------- Scavenging Coefficient -- Units: (sec)**(-1) Pollutant Liquid Precip. Frozen Precip. --------- -------------- -------------- !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 11a, 11b -- Chemistry Parameters --------------------- --------------- Subgroup (11a) --------------- Several parameters are needed for one or more of the chemical transformation mechanisms. Those used for each mechanism are: Page 470 2. CALPUFF.INP 20 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor S M B R O A B R R R C H 4 B N B V C N N N M K - - C O D C M G K I I I H H I I K F V E M K N N N T T T 2 2 S S P R C C O O H H H E E E O O R R M A N A Mechanism (MCHEM) Z 3 3 3 3 1 2 3 2 2 P P F C X Y -------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0 None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 MESOPUFF II X X . . X X X X . . . . . . . . 2 User Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 RIVAD X X . . X . . . . . . . . . . . 4 SOA X X . . . . . . . . . . X X X . 5 Radioactive Decay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X 6 RIVAD/ISORRPIA X X X X X X . . X X X X . . . . 7 RIVAD/ISORRPIA/SOA X X X X X X . . X X X X X X . . Ozone data input option (MOZ) Default: 1 ! MOZ = 0 ! (Used only if MCHEM = 1,3,4,6, or 7) 0 = use a monthly background ozone value 1 = read hourly ozone concentrations from the OZONE.DAT data file Monthly ozone concentrations in ppb (BCKO3) (Used only if MCHEM = 1,3,4,6, or 7 and either MOZ = 0, or MOZ = 1 and all hourly O3 data missing) Default: 12*80. ! BCKO3 = 17.30, 14.80, 32.70, 33.50, 32.90, 37.70, 36.50, 33.10, 30.10, 21.20, 19.10, 16.20 ! Ammonia data option (MNH3) Default: 0 ! MNH3 = 0 ! (Used only if MCHEM = 6 or 7) 0 = use monthly background ammonia values (BCKNH3) - no vertical variation 1 = read monthly background ammonia values for each layer from the NH3Z.DAT data file Ammonia vertical averaging option (MAVGNH3) (Used only if MCHEM = 6 or 7, and MNH3 = 1) 0 = use NH3 at puff center height (no averaging is done) 1 = average NH3 values over vertical extent of puff Default: 1 ! MAVGNH3 = 0 ! Monthly ammonia concentrations in ppb (BCKNH3) (Used only if MCHEM = 1 or 3, or if MCHEM = 6 or 7, and MNH3 = 0) Default: 12*10. ! BCKNH3 = 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00, 10.00 , 10.00 ! Nighttime SO2 loss rate in %/hour (RNITE1) (Used only if MCHEM = 1, 6 or 7) This rate is used only at night for MCHEM=1 and is added to the computed rate both day and night for MCHEM=6,7 (heterogeneous reactions) Default: 0.2 ! RNITE1 = .2 ! Nighttime NOx loss rate in %/hour (RNITE2) (Used only if MCHEM = 1) Default: 2.0 ! RNITE2 = 2.0 ! Nighttime HNO3 formation rate in %/hour (RNITE3) (Used only if MCHEM = 1) Default: 2.0 ! RNITE3 = 2.0 ! Page 471 2. CALPUFF.INP 21 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor H2O2 data input option (MH2O2) Default: 1 ! MH2O2 = 1 ! (Used only if MCHEM = 6 or 7, and MAQCHEM = 1) 0 = use a monthly background H2O2 value 1 = read hourly H2O2 concentrations from the H2O2.DAT data file Monthly H2O2 concentrations in ppb (BCKH2O2) (Used only if MQACHEM = 1 and either MH2O2 = 0 or MH2O2 = 1 and all hourly H2O2 data missing) Default: 12*1. ! BCKH2O2 = 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 ! --- Data for ISORROPIA Option (used only if MCHEM = 6 or 7) Minimum relative humidity used in ISORROPIA computations (RH_ISRP) Default: 50.! RH_ISRP = 50.0 ! Units: % Minimum SO4 used in ISORROPIA computations (SO4_ISRP) Default: 0.4 ! SO4_ISRP = .4 ! Units: ug/m3 --- Data for SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL (SOA) Options (used only if MCHEM = 4 or 7) The MCHEM = 4 SOA module uses monthly values of: Fine particulate concentration in ug/m^3 (BCKPMF) Organic fraction of fine particulate (OFRAC) VOC / NOX ratio (after reaction)(VCNX) The MCHEM = 7 SOA module uses monthly values of: Fine particulate concentration in ug/m^3 (BCKPMF) Organic fraction of fine particulate (OFRAC) These characterize the air mass when computing the formation of SOA from VOC emissions. Typical values for several distinct air mass types are: Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Clean Continental BCKPMF 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. OFRAC .15 .15 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .20 .15 VCNX 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. Clean Marine (surface) BCKPMF .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 OFRAC .25 .25 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .30 .25 VCNX 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. 50. Urban - low biogenic (controls present) BCKPMF 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. 30. OFRAC .20 .20 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .20 .20 .20 .20 VCNX 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. Urban - high biogenic (controls present) BCKPMF 60. 60. 60. 60. 60. 60. 60. 60. 60. 60. 60. 60. OFRAC .25 .25 .30 .30 .30 .55 .55 .55 .35 .35 .35 .25 VCNX 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. Page 472 2. CALPUFF.INP 22 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor Regional Plume BCKPMF 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. 20. OFRAC .20 .20 .25 .35 .25 .40 .40 .40 .30 .30 .30 .20 VCNX 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. 15. Urban - no controls present BCKPMF 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. OFRAC .30 .30 .35 .35 .35 .55 .55 .55 .35 .35 .35 .30 VCNX 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. Default: Clean Continental ! BCKPMF = 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 ! ! OFRAC = 0.15, 0.15, 0.20, 0.20, 0.20, 0.20, 0.20, 0.20, 0.20, 0.20, 0.20, 0.15 ! ! VCNX = 50.00, 50.00, 50.00, 50.00, 50.00, 50.00, 50.00, 50.00, 50.00, 50.00, 50.00 , 50.00 ! --- End Data for SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL (SOA) Options Number of half-life decay specification blocks provided in Subgroup 11b (Used only if MCHEM = 5) (NDECAY)Default: 0 ! NDECAY = 0 ! !END! -------------- Subgroup (11b) -------------- Each species modeled may be assigned a decay half-life (sec), and the associated mass lost may be assigned to one or more other modeled species using a mass yield factor. This information is used only for MCHEM=5. Provide NDECAY blocks assigning the half-life for a parent species and mass yield factors for each child species (if any) produced by the decay. Set HALF_LIFE=0.0 for NO decay (infinite half-life). a b SPECIES Half-Life Mass Yield NAME (sec) Factor ------- --------- ---------- * SPEC1 = 3600., -1.0 * (Parent) * SPEC2 = -1.0,0.0 * (Child) *END* -------- a Specify a half life that is greater than or equal to zero for 1 parent species in each block, and set the yield factor for this species to -1 b Specify a yield factor that is greater than or equal to zero for 1 or more child species in each block, and set the half-life for each of these species to -1 NOTE: Assignments in each block are treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. If NDECAY=0, no assignments and input group terminators should appear. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 12 -- Misc. Dispersion and Computational Parameters --------------- Horizontal size of puff (m) beyond which Page 473 2. CALPUFF.INP 23 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor time-dependent dispersion equations (Heffter) are used to determine sigma-y and sigma-z (SYTDEP)Default: 550. ! SYTDEP = 5.5E02 ! Switch for using Heffter equation for sigma z as above (0 = Not use Heffter; 1 = use Heffter (MHFTSZ)Default: 0 ! MHFTSZ = 0 ! Stability class used to determine plume growth rates for puffs above the boundary layer (JSUP)Default: 5 ! JSUP = 5 ! Vertical dispersion constant for stable conditions (k1 in Eqn. 2.7-3) (CONK1) Default: 0.01 ! CONK1 = .01 ! Vertical dispersion constant for neutral/ unstable conditions (k2 in Eqn. 2.7-4) (CONK2)Default: 0.1 ! CONK2 = .1 ! Factor for determining Transition-point from Schulman-Scire to Huber-Snyder Building Downwash scheme (SS used for Hs < Hb + TBD * HL) (TBD)Default: 0.5 ! TBD = .5 ! TBD < 0 ==> always use Huber-Snyder TBD = 1.5 ==> always use Schulman-Scire TBD = 0.5 ==> ISC Transition-point Range of land use categories for which urban dispersion is assumed (IURB1, IURB2)Default: 10 ! IURB1 = 10 ! 19 ! IURB2 = 19 ! Site characterization parameters for single-point Met data files --------- (needed for METFM = 2,3,4,5) Land use category for modeling domain (ILANDUIN)Default: 20 ! ILANDUIN = 20 ! Roughness length (m) for modeling domain (Z0IN)Default: 0.25 ! Z0IN = .25 ! Leaf area index for modeling domain (XLAIIN)Default: 3.0 ! XLAIIN = 3.0 ! Elevation above sea level (m) (ELEVIN)Default: 0.0 ! ELEVIN = .0 ! Latitude (degrees) for met location (XLATIN)Default: -999. ! XLATIN = -999.0 ! Longitude (degrees) for met location (XLONIN)Default: -999. ! XLONIN = -999.0 ! Specialized information for interpreting single-point Met data files ----- Anemometer height (m) (Used only if METFM = 2,3) (ANEMHT)Default: 10. ! ANEMHT = 10.0 ! Form of lateral turbulance data in PROFILE.DAT file (Used only if METFM = 4,5 or MTURBVW = 1 or 3) (ISIGMAV)Default: 1 ! ISIGMAV = 1 ! 0 = read sigma-theta 1 = read sigma-v Choice of mixing heights (Used only if METFM = 4) (IMIXCTDM)Default: 0 ! IMIXCTDM = 0 ! Page 474 2. CALPUFF.INP 24 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 0 = read PREDICTED mixing heights 1 = read OBSERVED mixing heights Maximum length of a slug (met. grid units) (XMXLEN)Default: 1.0 ! XMXLEN = 1.0 ! Maximum travel distance of a puff/slug (in grid units) during one sampling step (XSAMLEN)Default: 1.0 ! XSAMLEN = 1.0 ! Maximum Number of slugs/puffs release from one source during one time step (MXNEW)Default: 99 ! MXNEW = 99 ! Maximum Number of sampling steps for one puff/slug during one time step (MXSAM)Default: 99 ! MXSAM = 99 ! Number of iterations used when computing the transport wind for a sampling step that includes gradual rise (for CALMET and PROFILE winds) (NCOUNT)Default: 2 ! NCOUNT = 2 ! Minimum sigma y for a new puff/slug (m) (SYMIN)Default: 1.0 ! SYMIN = 1.0 ! Minimum sigma z for a new puff/slug (m) (SZMIN)Default: 1.0 ! SZMIN = 1.0 ! Maximum sigma z (m) allowed to avoid numerical problem in calculating virtual time or distance. Cap should be large enough to have no influence on normal events. Enter a negative cap to disable. (SZCAP_M)Default: 5.0e06 ! SZCAP_M = 5.0E06 ! Default minimum turbulence velocities sigma-v and sigma-w for each stability class over land and over water (m/s) (SVMIN(12) and SWMIN(12)) ---------- LAND ---------- --------- WATER ---------- Stab Class : A B C D E F A B C D E F --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Default SVMIN : .50, .50, .50, .50, .50, .50, .37, .37, .37, .37, .37, .37 Default SWMIN : .20, .12, .08, .06, .03, .016, .20, .12, .08, .06, .03, .016 ! SVMIN = 0.500, 0.500, 0.500, 0.500, 0.500, 0.500, 0.370, 0.370, 0.370, 0.370, 0.370, 0.370! ! SWMIN = 0.200, 0.120, 0.080, 0.060, 0.030, 0.016, 0.200, 0.120, 0.080, 0.060, 0.030, 0.016! Divergence criterion for dw/dz across puff used to initiate adjustment for horizontal convergence (1/s) Partial adjustment starts at CDIV(1), and full adjustment is reached at CDIV(2) (CDIV(2))Default: 0.0,0.0 ! CDIV = .0, .0 ! Search radius (number of cells) for nearest land and water cells used in the subgrid TIBL module (NLUTIBL)Default: 4 ! NLUTIBL = 4 ! Minimum wind speed (m/s) allowed for Page 475 2. CALPUFF.INP 25 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor non-calm conditions. Also used as minimum speed returned when using power-law extrapolation toward surface (WSCALM)Default: 0.5 ! WSCALM = .5 ! Maximum mixing height (m) (XMAXZI)Default: 3000. ! XMAXZI = 3000.0 ! Minimum mixing height (m) (XMINZI)Default: 50. ! XMINZI = 50.0 ! Temperatures (K) used for defining upper bound of categories for emissions scale-factors 11 upper bounds (K) are entered; the 12th class has no upper limit (TKCAT(11)) Default : 265., 270., 275., 280., 285., 290., 295., 300., 305., 310., 315. (315.+) < < < < < < < < < < < Temperature Class : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (12) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- - ! TKCAT = 265., 270., 275., 280., 285., 290., 295., 300., 305., 310., 315. ! Wind Speeds (m/s) used for defining upper bound of categories for emissions scale-factors 5 upper bounds (m/s) are entered; the 6th class has no upper limit (WSCAT(5))Default : ISC RURAL : 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.8 (10.8+) Wind Speed Class : 1 2 3 4 5 --- --- --- --- --- ! WSCAT = 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 ! Default wind speed profile power-law exponents for stabilities 1-6 (PLX0(6))Default : ISC RURAL values ISC RURAL : .07, .07, .10, .15, .35, .55 ISC URBAN : .15, .15, .20, .25, .30, .30 Stability Class : A B C D E F --- --- --- --- --- --- ! PLX0 = 0.07, 0.07, 0.10, 0.15, 0.35, 0.55 ! Default potential temperature gradient for stable classes E, F (degK/m) (PTG0(2))Default: 0.020, 0.035 ! PTG0 = 0.020, 0.035 ! Default plume path coefficients for each stability class (used when option for partial plume height terrain adjustment is selected -- MCTADJ=3) (PPC(6))Stability Class : A B C D E F Default PPC : .50, .50, .50, .50, .35, .35 --- --- --- --- --- --- ! PPC = 0.50, 0.50, 0.50, 0.50, 0.35, 0.35 ! Slug-to-puff transition criterion factor equal to sigma-y/length of slug (SL2PF)Default: 10. ! SL2PF = 10.0 ! Receptor-specific puff/slug properties (e.g., sigmas and height above ground at the time when the trajectory is nearest the receptor) may be Page 476 2. CALPUFF.INP 26 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor extrapolated forward or backward in time along the current step using the current dispersion, for receptors that lie upwind of the puff/slug position at the start of a step, or downwind at the end of a step. Specify the upwind/downwind extrapolation zone in sigma-y units. Using FCLIP=1.0 clips the the upwind zone at one sigma-y at the start of the step and the downwind zone at one sigma-y at the end of the step. This is consistent with the sampling done in CALPUFF versions through v6.42 prior to the introduction of the FCLIP option. The default is No Extrapolation, FCLIP=0.0. (FCLIP)Default: 0.0 ! FCLIP = 0.0 ! Puff-splitting control variables ------------------------ VERTICAL SPLIT -------------- Number of puffs that result every time a puff is split - nsplit=2 means that 1 puff splits into 2 (NSPLIT)Default: 3 ! NSPLIT = 3 ! Time(s) of a day when split puffs are eligible to be split once again; this is typically set once per day, around sunset before nocturnal shear develops. 24 values: 0 is midnight (00:00) and 23 is 11 PM (23:00) 0=do not re-split 1=eligible for re-split (IRESPLIT(24))Default: Hour 17 = 1 ! IRESPLIT = 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0 ! Split is allowed only if last hour's mixing height (m) exceeds a minimum value (ZISPLIT)Default: 100. ! ZISPLIT = 100.0 ! Split is allowed only if ratio of last hour's mixing ht to the maximum mixing ht experienced by the puff is less than a maximum value (this postpones a split until a nocturnal layer develops) (ROLDMAX)Default: 0.25 ! ROLDMAX = 0.25 ! HORIZONTAL SPLIT ---------------- Number of puffs that result every time a puff is split - nsplith=5 means that 1 puff splits into 5 (NSPLITH)Default: 5 ! NSPLITH = 5 ! Minimum sigma-y (Grid Cells Units) of puff before it may be split (SYSPLITH)Default: 1.0 ! SYSPLITH = 1.0 ! Minimum puff elongation rate (SYSPLITH/hr) due to wind shear, before it may be split (SHSPLITH)Default: 2. ! SHSPLITH = 2.0 ! Minimum concentration (g/m^3) of each species in puff before it may be split Enter array of NSPEC values; if a single value is entered, it will be used for ALL species (CNSPLITH)Default: 1.0E-07 ! CNSPLITH = 1.0E-07 ! Integration control variables ------------------------ Fractional convergence criterion for numerical SLUG sampling integration Page 477 2. CALPUFF.INP 27 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor (EPSSLUG)Default: 1.0e-04 ! EPSSLUG = 1.0E-04 ! Fractional convergence criterion for numerical AREA source integration (EPSAREA)Default: 1.0e-06 ! EPSAREA = 1.0E-06 ! Trajectory step-length (m) used for numerical rise integration (DSRISE)Default: 1.0 ! DSRISE = 1.0 ! Boundary Condition (BC) Puff control variables ------------------------ Minimum height (m) to which BC puffs are mixed as they are emitted (MBCON=2 ONLY). Actual height is reset to the current mixing height at the release point if greater than this minimum. (HTMINBC)Default: 500. ! HTMINBC = 500.0 ! Search radius (km) about a receptor for sampling nearest BC puff. BC puffs are typically emitted with a spacing of one grid cell length, so the search radius should be greater than DGRIDKM. (RSAMPBC)Default: 10. ! RSAMPBC = 10.0 ! Near-Surface depletion adjustment to concentration profile used when sampling BC puffs? (MDEPBC)Default: 1 ! MDEPBC = 1 ! 0 = Concentration is NOT adjusted for depletion 1 = Adjust Concentration for depletion !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUPS: 13a, 13b, 13c, 13d -- Point source parameters -------------------------------- --------------- Subgroup (13a) --------------- Number of point sources with parameters provided below (NPT1) No default ! NPT1 = 1 ! Units used for point source emissions below (IPTU) Default: 1 ! IPTU = 1 ! 1 = g/s 2 = kg/hr 3 = lb/hr 4 = tons/yr 5 = Odour Unit * m**3/s (vol. flux of odour compound) 6 = Odour Unit * m**3/min 7 = metric tons/yr 8 = Bq/s (Bq = becquerel = disintegrations/s) 9 = GBq/yr Number of source-species combinations with variable emissions scaling factors provided below in (13d) (NSPT1) Default: 0 ! NSPT1 = 0 ! Number of point sources with variable emission parameters provided in external file (NPT2) No default ! NPT2 = 0 ! Page 478 2. CALPUFF.INP 28 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor (If NPT2 > 0, these point source emissions are read from the file: PTEMARB.DAT) !END! --------------- Subgroup (13b) --------------- a POINT SOURCE: CONSTANT DATA ----------------------------- b c Source X Y Stack Base Stack Exit Exit Bldg. Emission No. Coordinate Coordinate Height Elevation Diameter Vel. Temp. Dwash Rates (km) (km) (m) (m) (m) (m/s) (deg. K) ------ ---------- ---------- ------ ------ -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- 1 ! SRCNAM = STCK1 ! 1 ! X = 680.53812, 4860.34615, 87.6, 100.94, 1.7, 23.02, 405.37, 1.0, 1.0E00 ! 1 ! ZPLTFM = .0 ! 1 ! FMFAC = 1.0 ! !END! -------- a Data for each source are treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. SRCNAM is a 12-character name for a source (No default) X is an array holding the source data listed by the column headings (No default) SIGYZI is an array holding the initial sigma-y and sigma-z (m) (Default: 0.,0.) FMFAC is a vertical momentum flux factor (0. or 1.0) used to represent the effect of rain-caps or other physical configurations that reduce momentum rise associated with the actual exit velocity. (Default: 1.0 -- full momentum used) ZPLTFM is the platform height (m) for sources influenced by an isolated structure that has a significant open area between the surface and the bulk of the structure, such as an offshore oil platform. The Base Elevation is that of the surface (ground or ocean), and the Stack Height is the release height above the Base (not above the platform). Building heights entered in Subgroup 13c must be those of the buildings on the platform, measured from the platform deck. ZPLTFM is used only with MBDW=1 (ISC downwash method) for sources with building downwash. (Default: 0.0) b 0. = No building downwash modeled 1. = Downwash modeled for buildings resting on the surface 2. = Downwash modeled for buildings raised above the surface (ZPLTFM > 0.) NOTE: must be entered as a REAL number (i.e., with decimal point) c An emission rate must be entered for every pollutant modeled. Enter emission rate of zero for secondary pollutants that are modeled, but not emitted. Units are specified by IPTU (e.g. 1 for g/s). --------------- Subgroup (13c) --------------- BUILDING DIMENSION DATA FOR SOURCES SUBJECT TO DOWNWASH Page 479 2. CALPUFF.INP 29 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor ------------------------------------------------------- Source a No. Effective building height, width, length and X/Y offset (in meters) every 10 degrees. LENGTH, XBADJ, and YBADJ are only needed for MBDW=2 (PRIME downwash option) ------ -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ! SRCNAM = STCK1 ! 1 ! HEIGHT = 34.9, 34.9, 31, 31, 18.44, 18.44, 18.44, 18.44, 18.44, 18.44, 31, 31, 34.9, 34.9, 34.9, 34.9, 34.9, 34.9, 34.9, 34.9, 31, 31, 18.44, 18.44, 18.44, 18.44, 18.44, 18.44, 31, 31, 34.9, 34.9, 34.9, 34.9, 34.9, 34.9! 1 ! WIDTH = 54.17, 56.2, 32.98, 31.24, 48, 45.54, 41.69, 43.32, 46.55, 48.37, 31.92, 33.24, 42.89, 37.52, 37.12, 35.59, 36.37, 37.47, 54.17, 56.2, 32.98, 31.24, 48, 45.54, 41.69, 43.32, 46.55, 48.37, 31.92, 33.24, 42.89, 40.24, 39.78, 40.74, 45.29, 50.5! 1 ! LENGTH = 45.77, 45.65, 33.24, 33.55, 41.07, 35.88, 29.59, 32.65, 38.51, 43.2, 33.71, 32.98, 55.12, 26.42, 21.38, 15.68, 17.93, 23.38, 45.77, 45.65, 33.24, 33.55, 41.07, 35.88, 29.59, 32.65, 38.51, 43.2, 33.71, 32.98, 55.12, 52.05, 47.39, 41.3, 41.88, 44.5! 1 ! XBADJ = 35.11, 28.81, 8.55, 3.38, -10.13, -11.87, -13.25, -19.1, -26.52, -33.14, -38.73, -43.15, -85.14, -101.34, -102.58, -100.7, -99.9, -98.01, -80.88, -74.46, -41.79, -36.93, -30.94, -24, -16.34, -13.56, -11.99, -10.06, 5.02, 10.17, 30.02, 36.31, 41.5, 45.42, 44.35, 40.34! 1 ! YBADJ = 33.66, 43.02, 26.66, 30.64, 24.01, 25.5, 26.21, 26.03, 25.11, 23.43, 29.42, 25.17, 35.24, 29.33, 13.59, -2.56, -18.64, -34.16, -33.66, -43.02, -26.66, -30.64, -24.01, -25.5, -26.21, -26.03, -25.11, -23.43, -29.42, -25.17, -35.24, -25.67, -13.61, 0.18, 12.18, 23.27! ! END ! -------- a Building height, width, length, and X/Y offset from the source are treated as a separate input subgroup for each source and therefore must end with an input group terminator. The X/Y offset is the position, relative to the stack, of the center of the upwind face of the projected building, with the x-axis pointing along the flow direction. --------------- Subgroup (13d) --------------- a POINT SOURCE: EMISSION-RATE SCALING FACTORS ------------------------------------------- Use this subgroup to identify temporal variations in the emission rates given in 13b. Factors assigned multiply the rates in 13b. Skip sources here that have constant emissions. For more elaborate variation in source parameters, use PTEMARB.DAT and NPT2 > 0. Sets of emission-rate scale factors are defined in Input Group 19, and are referenced by the FACTORNAME. Provide NSPT1 lines that identify the emission-rate scale factor table for each source-species combination that uses the scaling option. Note that a scale-factor table can be used with more than one source-species combination so a FACTORNAME can be repeated. Page 480 2. CALPUFF.INP 30 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor Source-Source Species Scale-factor table Species Name b Name c Name d No.(SRCNAM) (CSPEC) (FACTORNAME) ------------------ ------------ --------------------- -------- a Assignment for each source-specie is treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b Source name must match one of the SRCNAM names defined in Input Group 13b c Species name must match one of the CSPEC names of emitted species defined in Input Group 3 d Scale-factor name must match one of the FACTORNAME names defined in Input Group 19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUPS: 14a, 14b, 14c, 14d -- Area source parameters -------------------------------- --------------- Subgroup (14a) --------------- Number of polygon area sources with parameters specified below (NAR1) No default ! NAR1 = 0 ! Units used for area source emissions below (IARU) Default: 1 ! IARU = 1 ! 1 = g/m**2/s 2 = kg/m**2/hr 3 = lb/m**2/hr 4 = tons/m**2/yr 5 = Odour Unit * m/s (vol. flux/m**2 of odour compound) 6 = Odour Unit * m/min 7 = metric tons/m**2/yr 8 = Bq/m**2/s (Bq = becquerel = disintegrations/s) 9 = GBq/m**2/yr Number of source-species combinations with variable emissions scaling factors provided below in (14d) (NSAR1) Default: 0 ! NSAR1 = 0 ! Number of buoyant polygon area sources with variable location and emission parameters (NAR2)No default ! NAR2 = 0 ! (If NAR2 > 0, ALL parameter data for these sources are read from the file: BAEMARB.DAT) !END! --------------- Subgroup (14b) --------------- a AREA SOURCE: CONSTANT DATA ---------------------------- Page 481 2. CALPUFF.INP 31 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor b Source Effect. Base Initial Emission No.Height Elevation Sigma z Rates (m) (m) (m) ------------- ------ -------- --------- -------- a Data for each source are treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b An emission rate must be entered for every pollutant modeled. Enter emission rate of zero for secondary pollutants that are modeled, but not emitted. Units are specified by IARU (e.g. 1 for g/m**2/s). --------------- Subgroup (14c) --------------- COORDINATES (km) FOR EACH VERTEX(4) OF EACH POLYGON -------------------------------------------------------- Source a No. Ordered list of X followed by list of Y, grouped by source ------ ------------------------------------------------------------ -------- a Data for each source are treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. --------------- Subgroup (14d) --------------- a AREA SOURCE: EMISSION-RATE SCALING FACTORS ------------------------------------------- Use this subgroup to identify temporal variations in the emission rates given in 14b. Factors assigned multiply the rates in 14b. Skip sources here that have constant emissions. For more elaborate variation in source parameters, use BAEMARB.DAT and NAR2 > 0. Sets of emission-rate scale factors are defined in Input Group 19, and are referenced by the FACTORNAME. Provide NSAR1 lines that identify the emission-rate scale factor table for each source-species combination that uses the scaling option. Note that a scale-factor table can be used with more than one source-species combination so a FACTORNAME can be repeated. Source-Source Species Scale-factor table Species Name b Name c Name d No.(SRCNAM) (CSPEC) (FACTORNAME) ------------------ ------------ --------------------- 1 * SCALEFACTOR = 1,SO2, AREAS * *END* -------- a Assignment for each source-specie is treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b Source name must match one of the SRCNAM names defined in Input Group 14b Page 482 2. CALPUFF.INP 32 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor c Species name must match one of the CSPEC names of emitted species defined in Input Group 3 d Scale-factor name must match one of the FACTORNAME names defined in Input Group 19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUPS: 15a, 15b, 15c -- Line source parameters --------------------------- --------------- Subgroup (15a) --------------- Number of buoyant line sources with variable location and emission parameters (NLN2)No default ! NLN2 = 0 ! (If NLN2 > 0, ALL parameter data for these sources are read from the file: LNEMARB.DAT) Number of buoyant line sources (NLINES) No default ! NLINES = 0 ! Units used for line source emissions below (ILNU)Default: 1 ! ILNU = 1 ! 1 = g/s 2 = kg/hr 3 = lb/hr 4 = tons/yr 5 = Odour Unit * m**3/s (vol. flux of odour compound) 6 = Odour Unit * m**3/min 7 = metric tons/yr 8 = Bq/s (Bq = becquerel = disintegrations/s) 9 = GBq/yr Number of source-species combinations with variable emissions scaling factors provided below in (15c) (NSLN1)Default: 0 ! NSLN1 = 0 ! Maximum number of segments used to model each line (MXNSEG)Default: 7 ! MXNSEG = 7 ! The following variables are required only if NLINES > 0. They are used in the buoyant line source plume rise calculations. Number of distances at which Default: 6 ! NLRISE = 6 ! transitional rise is computed Average building length (XL)No default ! XL = .0 ! (in meters) Average building height (HBL)No default ! HBL = .0 ! (in meters) Average building width (WBL)No default ! WBL = .0 ! (in meters) Average line source width (WML)No default ! WML = .0 ! (in meters) Average separation between buildings (DXL) No default ! DXL = .0 ! (in meters) Page 483 2. CALPUFF.INP 33 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor Average buoyancy parameter (FPRIMEL) No default ! FPRIMEL = .0 ! (in m**4/s**3) !END! --------------- Subgroup (15b) --------------- BUOYANT LINE SOURCE: CONSTANT DATA ---------------------------------- a Source Beg. X Beg. Y End. X End. Y Release Base Emission No. Coordinate Coordinate Coordinate Coordinate Height Elevation Rates (km) (km) (km) (km) (m) (m) ------ ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ------- --------- --------- -------- a Data for each source are treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b An emission rate must be entered for every pollutant modeled. Enter emission rate of zero for secondary pollutants that are modeled, but not emitted. Units are specified by ILNTU (e.g. 1 for g/s). --------------- Subgroup (15c) --------------- a BUOYANT LINE SOURCE: EMISSION-RATE SCALING FACTORS -------------------------------------------------- Use this subgroup to identify temporal variations in the emission rates given in 15b. Factors assigned multiply the rates in 15b. Skip sources here that have constant emissions. For more elaborate variation in source parameters, use LNEMARB.DAT and NLN2 > 0. Sets of emission-rate scale factors are defined in Input Group 19, and are referenced by the FACTORNAME. Provide NSLN1 lines that identify the emission-rate scale factor table for each source-species combination that uses the scaling option. Note that a scale-factor table can be used with more than one source-species combination so a FACTORNAME can be repeated. Source-Source Species Scale-factor table Species Name b Name c Name d No.(SRCNAM) (CSPEC) (FACTORNAME) ------------------ ------------ --------------------- -------- a Assignment for each source-specie is treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b Source name must match one of the SRCNAM names defined in Input Group 15b c Species name must match one of the CSPEC names of emitted species defined in Input Group 3 d Scale-factor name must match one of the FACTORNAME names defined in Input Group 19 Page 484 2. CALPUFF.INP 34 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUPS: 16a, 16b, 16c -- Volume source parameters --------------------------- --------------- Subgroup (16a) --------------- Number of volume sources with parameters provided in 16b,c (NVL1) No default ! NVL1 = 0 ! Units used for volume source emissions below in 16b (IVLU) Default: 1 ! IVLU = 1 ! 1 = g/s 2 = kg/hr 3 = lb/hr 4 = tons/yr 5 = Odour Unit * m**3/s (vol. flux of odour compound) 6 = Odour Unit * m**3/min 7 = metric tons/yr 8 = Bq/s (Bq = becquerel = disintegrations/s) 9 = GBq/yr Number of source-species combinations with variable emissions scaling factors provided below in (16c) (NSVL1) Default: 0 ! NSVL1 = 0 ! Number of volume sources with variable location and emission parameters (NVL2) No default ! NVL2 = 0 ! (If NVL2 > 0, ALL parameter data for these sources are read from the VOLEMARB.DAT file(s) ) !END! --------------- Subgroup (16b) --------------- a VOLUME SOURCE: CONSTANT DATA ------------------------------ b Source X Y Effect. Base Initial Initial Emission No. Coordinate Coordinate Height Elevation Sigma y Sigma z Rates (km) (km)(m) (m) (m) (m) ------ ---------- ---------- ------ ------ -------- -------- -------- -------- a Data for each source are treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b An emission rate must be entered for every pollutant modeled. Enter emission rate of zero for secondary pollutants that are modeled, but not emitted. Units are specified by IVLU (e.g. 1 for g/s). --------------- Subgroup (16c) --------------- Page 485 2. CALPUFF.INP 35 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor a VOLUME SOURCE: EMISSION-RATE SCALING FACTORS -------------------------------------------- Use this subgroup to identify temporal variations in the emission rates given in 16b. Factors assigned multiply the rates in 16b. Skip sources here that have constant emissions. For more elaborate variation in source parameters, use VOLEMARB.DAT and NVL2 > 0. Sets of emission-rate scale factors are defined in Input Group 19, and are referenced by the FACTORNAME. Provide NSVL1 lines that identify the emission-rate scale factor table for each source-species combination that uses the scaling option. Note that a scale-factor table can be used with more than one source-species combination so a FACTORNAME can be repeated. Source-Source Species Scale-factor table Species Name b Name c Name d No.(SRCNAM) (CSPEC) (FACTORNAME) ------------------ ------------ --------------------- -------- a Assignment for each source-specie is treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b Source name must match one of the SRCNAM names defined in Input Group 16b c Species name must match one of the CSPEC names of emitted species defined in Input Group 3 d Scale-factor name must match one of the FACTORNAME names defined in Input Group 19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUP: 17 -- FLARE source control parameters (variable emissions file) --------------- Number of flare sources defined in FLEMARB.DAT file(s) (NFL2)Default: 0 ! NFL2 = 0 ! (At least 1 FLEMARB.DAT file is needed if NFL2 > 0) !END! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUPS: 18a, 18b, 18c -- Road Emissions parameters --------------------------- --------------- Subgroup (18a) --------------- Emissions from roads are generated from individual line segments defined by a sequence of coordinates provided for each road-link. Each link is entered as a discrete source and is defined as a section of the road for which emissions are uniform. A long, winding isolated road might be characterized by a single link made up of many coordinate triples (x,y,z) that describe its pathway. These Page 486 2. CALPUFF.INP 36 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor points should be sufficient to resolve curves, but need not have uniform spacing. For example, a straight flat segment can be defined by 2 points, regardless of the distance covered. Long line segments are automatically divided further within the model into segments that are limited by the grid-cell boundaries (no segment may extend across multiple cells). One emission rate (g/m/s) for each species is used for the entire road. Near a congested intersection, many short links may be required to resolve the spatial and temporal distribution of emissions. Each is entered and modeled as a discrete source. Number of road-links with emission parameters provided in Subgroup 18b (NRD1) No default ! NRD1 = 0 ! Number of road-links with arbitrarily time-varying emission parameters (NRD2)No default ! NRD2 = 0 ! (If NRD2 > 0, ALL variable road data are read from the file: RDEMARB.DAT) Emissions from one or more of the roads presented in Subgroup 18b may vary over time-based cycles or by meteorology. This variability is modeled by applying an emission-rate scale factor specified for particular road links and species in Subgroup 18c. Number of road links and species combinations with variable emission-rate scale-factors (NSFRDS)Default: 0 ! NSFRDS = 0 ! !END! --------------- Subgroup (18b) --------------- a DATA FOR ROADS WITH CONSTANT OR SCALED EMISSION PARAMETERS ----------------------------------------------------------- b Road Effect. Initial Initial Emission No.Height Sigma z Sigma y Rates (mAGL) (m) (m) (g/s/m) ------------- ------ -------- --------- -------- a Data for each of the NRD1 roads are treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b NSPEC Emission rates must be entered (one for every pollutant modeled). Enter emission rate of zero for secondary pollutants. c Road-source names are entered without spaces, and may be 16 characters long. --------------- Subgroup (18c) --------------- a EMISSION-RATE SCALING FACTORS ------------------------------ Use this subgroup to identify temporal variations in the emission rates given in 18b. Factors assigned multiply the rates in 18b. Skip sources here that have constant emissions. For more elaborate variation in source parameters, use RDEMARB.DAT and NRD2 > 0. Page 487 2. CALPUFF.INP 37 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor Sets of emission-rate scale factors are defined in Input Group 19, and are referenced by the FACTORNAME. Provide NSFRDS lines that identify the emission-rate scale factor table for each source-species combination that uses the scaling option. Note that a scale-factor table can be used with more than one source-species combination so a FACTORNAME can be repeated. Source-Source Species Scale-factor table Species Name b Name c Name d No.(SRCNAM) (CSPEC) (FACTORNAME) ------------------ ------------ --------------------- -------- a Assignment for each source-specie is treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b Source name must match one of the SRCNAM names defined in Input Group 18b c Species name must match one of the CSPEC names of emitted species defined in Input Group 3 d Scale-factor name must match one of the FACTORNAME names defined in Input Group 19 --------------- Subgroup (18d) --------------- a COORDINATES FOR EACH NAMED ROAD ------------------------------- X Y Ground Coordinate Coordinate Coordinate Elevation No.(km) (km)(m) ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- -------- a Each line of coordinates is treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUPS: 19a, 19b -- Emission rate scale-factor tables ---------------------- Use this group to enter variation factors applied to emission rates for any source-specie combinations that use this feature. The tables of emission-rate scale factors are referenced by the name assigned to FACTORNAME. These names do not need to include specific source or species names used in the simulation, particularly if one factor table is used for many types of sources and species, but should be descriptive. But if a factor table applies to just one source, the reference name for it should generally contain that source-name. FACTORNAME must NOT include spaces. The FACTORTYPE for each table must be one of the following: CONSTANT1 1 scaling factor MONTH12 12 scaling factors: months 1-12 DAY7 7 scaling factors: days 1-7 Page 488 2. CALPUFF.INP 38 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor [SUNDAY,MONDAY, ... FRIDAY,SATURDAY] HOUR24 24 scaling factors: hours 1-24 HOUR24_DAY7 168 scaling factors: hours 1-24, repeated 7 times: SUNDAY, MONDAY, ... SATURDAY HOUR24_MONTH12 288 scaling factors: hours 1-24, repeated 12 times: months 1-12 WSP6 6 scaling factors: wind speed classes 1-6 [speed classes (WSCAT) defined in Group 12] WSP6_PGCLASS6 36 scaling factors: wind speed classes 1-6 repeated 6 times: PG classes A,B,C,D,E,F [speed classes (WSCAT) defined in Group 12] TEMPERATURE12 12 scaling factors: temperature classes 1-12 [temperature classes (TKCAT) defined in Group 12] The number of tables defined may exceed the number of tables referenced in the input groups for each source type above (for convenience), but tables for all FACTORNAME names referenced must be present here. --------------- Subgroup (19a) --------------- Number of Emission Scale-Factor tables (NSFTAB) Default: 0 ! NSFTAB = 0 ! !END! --------------- Subgroup (19b) --------------- a,b,c Enter factors for NSFTAB Emission Scale-Factor tables -------- a Assignments for each table are treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b FACTORNAME must be no longer than 40 characters c Spaces are NOT allowed in any FACTORNAME or FACTORTYPE assignment, and the names are NOT case-sensitive ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT GROUPS: 20a, 20b, 20c -- Non-gridded (discrete) receptor information --------------------------- --------------- Subgroup (20a) --------------- Number of non-gridded receptors (NREC) No default ! NREC = 4353 ! Group names can be used to assign receptor locations in Subgroup 20c and thereby provide an identification that can be referenced when postprocessing receptors. The default assignment name X is used when NRGRP = 0. Page 489 2. CALPUFF.INP 39 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor Number of receptor group names (NRGRP) Default: 0 ! NRGRP = 0 ! !END! --------------- Subgroup (20b) --------------- Provide a name for each receptor group if NRGRP>0. Enter NRGRP lines. a,b Group Name ---------- ------------- a Each group name provided is treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b Receptor group names must not include blanks. --------------- Subgroup (20c) --------------- a NON-GRIDDED (DISCRETE) RECEPTOR DATA ------------------------------------ c X Y Ground Height b Receptor Group Coordinate Coordinate Elevation Above Ground No. Name (km)(km)(m)(m) -------- ----- ---------- ---------- --------- ------------ 1!X=680.15, 4859.96, 85.63, 0.000!!END! 2!X=680.17, 4859.96, 86.26, 0.000!!END! 3!X=680.19, 4859.96, 87.1, 0.000!!END! 4!X=680.21, 4859.96, 88.29, 0.000!!END! 5!X=680.23, 4859.96, 89.47, 0.000!!END! 6!X=680.25, 4859.96, 90.63, 0.000!!END! 7!X=680.27, 4859.96, 91.16, 0.000!!END! 8!X=680.29, 4859.96, 91.68, 0.000!!END! 9!X=680.31, 4859.96, 92.2, 0.000!!END! 10!X=680.33, 4859.96, 92.39, 0.000!!END! 11!X=680.35, 4859.96, 92.44, 0.000!!END! 12!X=680.37, 4859.96, 92.5, 0.000!!END! 13!X=680.39, 4859.96, 92.55, 0.000!!END! 14!X=680.41, 4859.96, 92.61, 0.000!!END! 15!X=680.43, 4859.96, 92.68, 0.000!!END! 16!X=680.45, 4859.96, 92.75, 0.000!!END! 17!X=680.47, 4859.96, 92.82, 0.000!!END! 18!X=680.49, 4859.96, 92.89, 0.000!!END! 19!X=680.51, 4859.96, 92.97, 0.000!!END! 20!X=680.53, 4859.96, 92.95, 0.000!!END! 21!X=680.55, 4859.96, 92.86, 0.000!!END! 22!X=680.57, 4859.96, 92.77, 0.000!!END! 23!X=680.59, 4859.96, 92.85, 0.000!!END! 24!X=680.61, 4859.96, 93.35, 0.000!!END! 25!X=680.63, 4859.96, 93.85, 0.000!!END! 26!X=680.65, 4859.96, 94.34, 0.000!!END! 27!X=680.67, 4859.96, 94.83, 0.000!!END! 28!X=680.69, 4859.96, 95.32, 0.000!!END! 29!X=680.71, 4859.96, 95.8, 0.000!!END! 30!X=680.73, 4859.96, 96, 0.000!!END! 31!X=680.75, 4859.96, 95.99, 0.000!!END! Page 490 2. CALPUFF.INP 40 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 32!X=680.77, 4859.96, 95.99, 0.000!!END! 33!X=680.79, 4859.96, 96.29, 0.000!!END! 34!X=680.81, 4859.96, 97.57, 0.000!!END! 35!X=680.83, 4859.96, 98.84, 0.000!!END! 36!X=680.85, 4859.96, 100.11, 0.000!!END! 37!X=680.87, 4859.96, 100.38, 0.000!!END! 38!X=680.89, 4859.96, 100.53, 0.000!!END! 39!X=680.91, 4859.96, 100.7, 0.000!!END! 40!X=680.93, 4859.96, 101.2, 0.000!!END! 41!X=680.95, 4859.96, 101.98, 0.000!!END! 42!X=680.15, 4859.98, 86.16, 0.000!!END! 43!X=680.17, 4859.98, 86.77, 0.000!!END! 44!X=680.19, 4859.98, 87.59, 0.000!!END! 45!X=680.21, 4859.98, 88.73, 0.000!!END! 46!X=680.23, 4859.98, 89.88, 0.000!!END! 47!X=680.25, 4859.98, 91.01, 0.000!!END! 48!X=680.27, 4859.98, 91.62, 0.000!!END! 49!X=680.29, 4859.98, 92.22, 0.000!!END! 50!X=680.31, 4859.98, 92.82, 0.000!!END! 51!X=680.33, 4859.98, 93, 0.000!!END! 52!X=680.35, 4859.98, 92.98, 0.000!!END! 53!X=680.37, 4859.98, 92.97, 0.000!!END! 54!X=680.39, 4859.98, 92.96, 0.000!!END! 55!X=680.41, 4859.98, 92.96, 0.000!!END! 56!X=680.43, 4859.98, 92.96, 0.000!!END! 57!X=680.45, 4859.98, 92.96, 0.000!!END! 58!X=680.47, 4859.98, 92.97, 0.000!!END! 59!X=680.49, 4859.98, 92.98, 0.000!!END! 60!X=680.51, 4859.98, 92.99, 0.000!!END! 61!X=680.53, 4859.98, 92.99, 0.000!!END! 62!X=680.55, 4859.98, 92.97, 0.000!!END! 63!X=680.57, 4859.98, 92.94, 0.000!!END! 64!X=680.59, 4859.98, 93.1, 0.000!!END! 65!X=680.61, 4859.98, 93.66, 0.000!!END! 66!X=680.63, 4859.98, 94.23, 0.000!!END! 67!X=680.65, 4859.98, 94.79, 0.000!!END! 68!X=680.67, 4859.98, 95.34, 0.000!!END! 69!X=680.69, 4859.98, 95.89, 0.000!!END! 70!X=680.71, 4859.98, 96.44, 0.000!!END! 71!X=680.73, 4859.98, 96.53, 0.000!!END! 72!X=680.75, 4859.98, 96.33, 0.000!!END! 73!X=680.77, 4859.98, 96.14, 0.000!!END! 74!X=680.79, 4859.98, 96.36, 0.000!!END! 75!X=680.81, 4859.98, 97.77, 0.000!!END! 76!X=680.83, 4859.98, 99.17, 0.000!!END! 77!X=680.85, 4859.98, 100.56, 0.000!!END! 78!X=680.87, 4859.98, 100.58, 0.000!!END! 79!X=680.89, 4859.98, 100.48, 0.000!!END! 80!X=680.91, 4859.98, 100.38, 0.000!!END! 81!X=680.93, 4859.98, 100.82, 0.000!!END! 82!X=680.95, 4859.98, 101.67, 0.000!!END! 83!X=680.15, 4860, 86.62, 0.000!!END! 84!X=680.17, 4860, 87.36, 0.000!!END! 85!X=680.19, 4860, 88.16, 0.000!!END! 86!X=680.21, 4860, 89.04, 0.000!!END! 87!X=680.23, 4860, 89.93, 0.000!!END! 88!X=680.25, 4860, 90.81, 0.000!!END! 89!X=680.27, 4860, 91.42, 0.000!!END! 90!X=680.29, 4860, 92.02, 0.000!!END! 91!X=680.31, 4860, 92.62, 0.000!!END! 92!X=680.33, 4860, 92.97, 0.000!!END! 93!X=680.35, 4860, 93.22, 0.000!!END! 94!X=680.37, 4860, 93.46, 0.000!!END! 95!X=680.39, 4860, 93.59, 0.000!!END! 96!X=680.41, 4860, 93.57, 0.000!!END! 97!X=680.43, 4860, 93.56, 0.000!!END! Page 491 2. CALPUFF.INP 41 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 98!X=680.45, 4860, 93.54, 0.000!!END! 99!X=680.47, 4860, 93.41, 0.000!!END! 100!X=680.49, 4860, 93.3, 0.000!!END! 101!X=680.51, 4860, 93.19, 0.000!!END! 102!X=680.53, 4860, 93.19, 0.000!!END! 103!X=680.55, 4860, 93.23, 0.000!!END! 104!X=680.57, 4860, 93.26, 0.000!!END! 105!X=680.59, 4860, 93.46, 0.000!!END! 106!X=680.61, 4860, 94.01, 0.000!!END! 107!X=680.63, 4860, 94.56, 0.000!!END! 108!X=680.65, 4860, 95.11, 0.000!!END! 109!X=680.67, 4860, 95.67, 0.000!!END! 110!X=680.69, 4860, 96.23, 0.000!!END! 111!X=680.71, 4860, 96.79, 0.000!!END! 112!X=680.73, 4860, 96.87, 0.000!!END! 113!X=680.75, 4860, 96.65, 0.000!!END! 114!X=680.77, 4860, 96.42, 0.000!!END! 115!X=680.79, 4860, 96.63, 0.000!!END! 116!X=680.81, 4860, 97.99, 0.000!!END! 117!X=680.83, 4860, 99.38, 0.000!!END! 118!X=680.85, 4860, 100.78, 0.000!!END! 119!X=680.87, 4860, 100.64, 0.000!!END! 120!X=680.89, 4860, 100.38, 0.000!!END! 121!X=680.91, 4860, 100.11, 0.000!!END! 122!X=680.93, 4860, 100.49, 0.000!!END! 123!X=680.95, 4860, 101.35, 0.000!!END! 124!X=680.15, 4860.02, 87.09, 0.000!!END! 125!X=680.17, 4860.02, 87.96, 0.000!!END! 126!X=680.19, 4860.02, 88.71, 0.000!!END! 127!X=680.21, 4860.02, 89.33, 0.000!!END! 128!X=680.23, 4860.02, 89.97, 0.000!!END! 129!X=680.25, 4860.02, 90.61, 0.000!!END! 130!X=680.27, 4860.02, 91.22, 0.000!!END! 131!X=680.29, 4860.02, 91.82, 0.000!!END! 132!X=680.31, 4860.02, 92.42, 0.000!!END! 133!X=680.33, 4860.02, 92.96, 0.000!!END! 134!X=680.35, 4860.02, 93.47, 0.000!!END! 135!X=680.37, 4860.02, 93.96, 0.000!!END! 136!X=680.39, 4860.02, 94.24, 0.000!!END! 137!X=680.41, 4860.02, 94.22, 0.000!!END! 138!X=680.43, 4860.02, 94.2, 0.000!!END! 139!X=680.45, 4860.02, 94.17, 0.000!!END! 140!X=680.47, 4860.02, 93.92, 0.000!!END! 141!X=680.49, 4860.02, 93.68, 0.000!!END! 142!X=680.51, 4860.02, 93.44, 0.000!!END! 143!X=680.53, 4860.02, 93.45, 0.000!!END! 144!X=680.55, 4860.02, 93.55, 0.000!!END! 145!X=680.57, 4860.02, 93.65, 0.000!!END! 146!X=680.59, 4860.02, 93.89, 0.000!!END! 147!X=680.61, 4860.02, 94.37, 0.000!!END! 148!X=680.63, 4860.02, 94.85, 0.000!!END! 149!X=680.65, 4860.02, 95.34, 0.000!!END! 150!X=680.67, 4860.02, 95.83, 0.000!!END! 151!X=680.69, 4860.02, 96.33, 0.000!!END! 152!X=680.71, 4860.02, 96.83, 0.000!!END! 153!X=680.73, 4860.02, 96.99, 0.000!!END! 154!X=680.75, 4860.02, 96.96, 0.000!!END! 155!X=680.77, 4860.02, 96.92, 0.000!!END! 156!X=680.79, 4860.02, 97.21, 0.000!!END! 157!X=680.81, 4860.02, 98.26, 0.000!!END! 158!X=680.83, 4860.02, 99.32, 0.000!!END! 159!X=680.85, 4860.02, 100.4, 0.000!!END! 160!X=680.87, 4860.02, 100.33, 0.000!!END! 161!X=680.89, 4860.02, 100.19, 0.000!!END! 162!X=680.91, 4860.02, 100.06, 0.000!!END! 163!X=680.93, 4860.02, 100.36, 0.000!!END! Page 492 2. CALPUFF.INP 42 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 164!X=680.95, 4860.02, 100.96, 0.000!!END! 165!X=680.15, 4860.04, 87.57, 0.000!!END! 166!X=680.17, 4860.04, 88.57, 0.000!!END! 167!X=680.19, 4860.04, 89.25, 0.000!!END! 168!X=680.21, 4860.04, 89.61, 0.000!!END! 169!X=680.23, 4860.04, 89.99, 0.000!!END! 170!X=680.25, 4860.04, 90.41, 0.000!!END! 171!X=680.27, 4860.04, 91.02, 0.000!!END! 172!X=680.29, 4860.04, 91.62, 0.000!!END! 173!X=680.31, 4860.04, 92.22, 0.000!!END! 174!X=680.33, 4860.04, 92.96, 0.000!!END! 175!X=680.35, 4860.04, 93.73, 0.000!!END! 176!X=680.37, 4860.04, 94.48, 0.000!!END! 177!X=680.39, 4860.04, 94.89, 0.000!!END! 178!X=680.41, 4860.04, 94.87, 0.000!!END! 179!X=680.43, 4860.04, 94.85, 0.000!!END! 180!X=680.45, 4860.04, 94.8, 0.000!!END! 181!X=680.47, 4860.04, 94.42, 0.000!!END! 182!X=680.49, 4860.04, 94.05, 0.000!!END! 183!X=680.51, 4860.04, 93.69, 0.000!!END! 184!X=680.53, 4860.04, 93.72, 0.000!!END! 185!X=680.55, 4860.04, 93.88, 0.000!!END! 186!X=680.57, 4860.04, 94.05, 0.000!!END! 187!X=680.59, 4860.04, 94.31, 0.000!!END! 188!X=680.61, 4860.04, 94.72, 0.000!!END! 189!X=680.63, 4860.04, 95.14, 0.000!!END! 190!X=680.65, 4860.04, 95.57, 0.000!!END! 191!X=680.67, 4860.04, 96, 0.000!!END! 192!X=680.69, 4860.04, 96.43, 0.000!!END! 193!X=680.71, 4860.04, 96.86, 0.000!!END! 194!X=680.73, 4860.04, 97.12, 0.000!!END! 195!X=680.75, 4860.04, 97.29, 0.000!!END! 196!X=680.77, 4860.04, 97.44, 0.000!!END! 197!X=680.79, 4860.04, 97.78, 0.000!!END! 198!X=680.81, 4860.04, 98.5, 0.000!!END! 199!X=680.83, 4860.04, 99.24, 0.000!!END! 200!X=680.85, 4860.04, 100, 0.000!!END! 201!X=680.87, 4860.04, 100.02, 0.000!!END! 202!X=680.89, 4860.04, 100.01, 0.000!!END! 203!X=680.91, 4860.04, 100.01, 0.000!!END! 204!X=680.93, 4860.04, 100.21, 0.000!!END! 205!X=680.95, 4860.04, 100.56, 0.000!!END! 206!X=680.15, 4860.06, 88.05, 0.000!!END! 207!X=680.17, 4860.06, 89.18, 0.000!!END! 208!X=680.19, 4860.06, 89.77, 0.000!!END! 209!X=680.21, 4860.06, 89.88, 0.000!!END! 210!X=680.23, 4860.06, 90, 0.000!!END! 211!X=680.25, 4860.06, 90.21, 0.000!!END! 212!X=680.27, 4860.06, 90.82, 0.000!!END! 213!X=680.29, 4860.06, 91.42, 0.000!!END! 214!X=680.31, 4860.06, 92.02, 0.000!!END! 215!X=680.33, 4860.06, 92.98, 0.000!!END! 216!X=680.35, 4860.06, 94, 0.000!!END! 217!X=680.37, 4860.06, 95.01, 0.000!!END! 218!X=680.39, 4860.06, 95.54, 0.000!!END! 219!X=680.41, 4860.06, 95.52, 0.000!!END! 220!X=680.43, 4860.06, 95.5, 0.000!!END! 221!X=680.45, 4860.06, 95.42, 0.000!!END! 222!X=680.47, 4860.06, 94.92, 0.000!!END! 223!X=680.49, 4860.06, 94.42, 0.000!!END! 224!X=680.51, 4860.06, 93.92, 0.000!!END! 225!X=680.53, 4860.06, 93.99, 0.000!!END! 226!X=680.55, 4860.06, 94.22, 0.000!!END! 227!X=680.57, 4860.06, 94.45, 0.000!!END! 228!X=680.59, 4860.06, 94.72, 0.000!!END! 229!X=680.61, 4860.06, 95.08, 0.000!!END! Page 493 2. CALPUFF.INP 43 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 230!X=680.63, 4860.06, 95.43, 0.000!!END! 231!X=680.65, 4860.06, 95.79, 0.000!!END! 232!X=680.67, 4860.06, 96.16, 0.000!!END! 233!X=680.69, 4860.06, 96.52, 0.000!!END! 234!X=680.71, 4860.06, 96.89, 0.000!!END! 235!X=680.73, 4860.06, 97.26, 0.000!!END! 236!X=680.75, 4860.06, 97.62, 0.000!!END! 237!X=680.77, 4860.06, 97.97, 0.000!!END! 238!X=680.79, 4860.06, 98.33, 0.000!!END! 239!X=680.81, 4860.06, 98.73, 0.000!!END! 240!X=680.83, 4860.06, 99.15, 0.000!!END! 241!X=680.85, 4860.06, 99.58, 0.000!!END! 242!X=680.87, 4860.06, 99.72, 0.000!!END! 243!X=680.89, 4860.06, 99.84, 0.000!!END! 244!X=680.91, 4860.06, 99.96, 0.000!!END! 245!X=680.93, 4860.06, 100.05, 0.000!!END! 246!X=680.95, 4860.06, 100.14, 0.000!!END! 247!X=680.15, 4860.08, 88.73, 0.000!!END! 248!X=680.17, 4860.08, 89.94, 0.000!!END! 249!X=680.19, 4860.08, 90.48, 0.000!!END! 250!X=680.21, 4860.08, 90.45, 0.000!!END! 251!X=680.23, 4860.08, 90.43, 0.000!!END! 252!X=680.25, 4860.08, 90.52, 0.000!!END! 253!X=680.27, 4860.08, 91.06, 0.000!!END! 254!X=680.29, 4860.08, 91.61, 0.000!!END! 255!X=680.31, 4860.08, 92.16, 0.000!!END! 256!X=680.33, 4860.08, 93.18, 0.000!!END! 257!X=680.35, 4860.08, 94.3, 0.000!!END! 258!X=680.37, 4860.08, 95.43, 0.000!!END! 259!X=680.39, 4860.08, 96, 0.000!!END! 260!X=680.41, 4860.08, 96, 0.000!!END! 261!X=680.43, 4860.08, 96, 0.000!!END! 262!X=680.45, 4860.08, 95.92, 0.000!!END! 263!X=680.47, 4860.08, 95.34, 0.000!!END! 264!X=680.49, 4860.08, 94.76, 0.000!!END! 265!X=680.51, 4860.08, 94.17, 0.000!!END! 266!X=680.53, 4860.08, 94.27, 0.000!!END! 267!X=680.55, 4860.08, 94.56, 0.000!!END! 268!X=680.57, 4860.08, 94.84, 0.000!!END! 269!X=680.59, 4860.08, 95.13, 0.000!!END! 270!X=680.61, 4860.08, 95.43, 0.000!!END! 271!X=680.63, 4860.08, 95.72, 0.000!!END! 272!X=680.65, 4860.08, 96.01, 0.000!!END! 273!X=680.67, 4860.08, 96.31, 0.000!!END! 274!X=680.69, 4860.08, 96.61, 0.000!!END! 275!X=680.71, 4860.08, 96.92, 0.000!!END! 276!X=680.73, 4860.08, 97.42, 0.000!!END! 277!X=680.75, 4860.08, 97.97, 0.000!!END! 278!X=680.77, 4860.08, 98.51, 0.000!!END! 279!X=680.79, 4860.08, 98.86, 0.000!!END! 280!X=680.81, 4860.08, 98.94, 0.000!!END! 281!X=680.83, 4860.08, 99.04, 0.000!!END! 282!X=680.85, 4860.08, 99.16, 0.000!!END! 283!X=680.87, 4860.08, 99.42, 0.000!!END! 284!X=680.89, 4860.08, 99.68, 0.000!!END! 285!X=680.91, 4860.08, 99.92, 0.000!!END! 286!X=680.93, 4860.08, 99.87, 0.000!!END! 287!X=680.95, 4860.08, 99.7, 0.000!!END! 288!X=680.15, 4860.1, 89.54, 0.000!!END! 289!X=680.17, 4860.1, 90.81, 0.000!!END! 290!X=680.19, 4860.1, 91.34, 0.000!!END! 291!X=680.21, 4860.1, 91.32, 0.000!!END! 292!X=680.23, 4860.1, 91.3, 0.000!!END! 293!X=680.25, 4860.1, 91.38, 0.000!!END! 294!X=680.27, 4860.1, 91.86, 0.000!!END! 295!X=680.29, 4860.1, 92.35, 0.000!!END! Page 494 2. CALPUFF.INP 44 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 296!X=680.31, 4860.1, 92.84, 0.000!!END! 297!X=680.33, 4860.1, 93.69, 0.000!!END! 298!X=680.35, 4860.1, 94.62, 0.000!!END! 299!X=680.37, 4860.1, 95.55, 0.000!!END! 300!X=680.39, 4860.1, 96, 0.000!!END! 301!X=680.41, 4860.1, 96, 0.000!!END! 302!X=680.43, 4860.1, 96, 0.000!!END! 303!X=680.45, 4860.1, 95.92, 0.000!!END! 304!X=680.47, 4860.1, 95.48, 0.000!!END! 305!X=680.49, 4860.1, 95.02, 0.000!!END! 306!X=680.51, 4860.1, 94.56, 0.000!!END! 307!X=680.53, 4860.1, 94.66, 0.000!!END! 308!X=680.55, 4860.1, 94.88, 0.000!!END! 309!X=680.57, 4860.1, 95.1, 0.000!!END! 310!X=680.59, 4860.1, 95.39, 0.000!!END! 311!X=680.61, 4860.1, 95.74, 0.000!!END! 312!X=680.63, 4860.1, 96.1, 0.000!!END! 313!X=680.65, 4860.1, 96.42, 0.000!!END! 314!X=680.67, 4860.1, 96.53, 0.000!!END! 315!X=680.69, 4860.1, 96.65, 0.000!!END! 316!X=680.71, 4860.1, 96.79, 0.000!!END! 317!X=680.73, 4860.1, 97.32, 0.000!!END! 318!X=680.75, 4860.1, 97.98, 0.000!!END! 319!X=680.77, 4860.1, 98.62, 0.000!!END! 320!X=680.79, 4860.1, 99.02, 0.000!!END! 321!X=680.81, 4860.1, 99.07, 0.000!!END! 322!X=680.83, 4860.1, 99.11, 0.000!!END! 323!X=680.85, 4860.1, 99.16, 0.000!!END! 324!X=680.87, 4860.1, 99.37, 0.000!!END! 325!X=680.89, 4860.1, 99.59, 0.000!!END! 326!X=680.91, 4860.1, 99.81, 0.000!!END! 327!X=680.93, 4860.1, 99.69, 0.000!!END! 328!X=680.95, 4860.1, 99.43, 0.000!!END! 329!X=680.15, 4860.12, 90.34, 0.000!!END! 330!X=680.17, 4860.12, 91.68, 0.000!!END! 331!X=680.19, 4860.12, 92.21, 0.000!!END! 332!X=680.21, 4860.12, 92.18, 0.000!!END! 333!X=680.23, 4860.12, 92.16, 0.000!!END! 334!X=680.25, 4860.12, 92.24, 0.000!!END! 335!X=680.27, 4860.12, 92.66, 0.000!!END! 336!X=680.29, 4860.12, 93.08, 0.000!!END! 337!X=680.31, 4860.12, 93.5, 0.000!!END! 338!X=680.33, 4860.12, 94.19, 0.000!!END! 339!X=680.35, 4860.12, 94.92, 0.000!!END! 340!X=680.37, 4860.12, 95.66, 0.000!!END! 341!X=680.39, 4860.12, 96, 0.000!!END! 342!X=680.41, 4860.12, 96, 0.000!!END! 343!X=680.43, 4860.12, 96, 0.000!!END! 344!X=680.45, 4860.12, 95.94, 0.000!!END! 345!X=680.47, 4860.12, 95.62, 0.000!!END! 346!X=680.49, 4860.12, 95.3, 0.000!!END! 347!X=680.51, 4860.12, 94.96, 0.000!!END! 348!X=680.53, 4860.12, 95.04, 0.000!!END! 349!X=680.55, 4860.12, 95.2, 0.000!!END! 350!X=680.57, 4860.12, 95.36, 0.000!!END! 351!X=680.59, 4860.12, 95.65, 0.000!!END! 352!X=680.61, 4860.12, 96.07, 0.000!!END! 353!X=680.63, 4860.12, 96.48, 0.000!!END! 354!X=680.65, 4860.12, 96.82, 0.000!!END! 355!X=680.67, 4860.12, 96.74, 0.000!!END! 356!X=680.69, 4860.12, 96.67, 0.000!!END! 357!X=680.71, 4860.12, 96.61, 0.000!!END! 358!X=680.73, 4860.12, 97.18, 0.000!!END! 359!X=680.75, 4860.12, 97.89, 0.000!!END! 360!X=680.77, 4860.12, 98.61, 0.000!!END! 361!X=680.79, 4860.12, 99.05, 0.000!!END! Page 495 2. CALPUFF.INP 45 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 362!X=680.81, 4860.12, 99.16, 0.000!!END! 363!X=680.83, 4860.12, 99.27, 0.000!!END! 364!X=680.85, 4860.12, 99.37, 0.000!!END! 365!X=680.87, 4860.12, 99.45, 0.000!!END! 366!X=680.89, 4860.12, 99.54, 0.000!!END! 367!X=680.91, 4860.12, 99.64, 0.000!!END! 368!X=680.93, 4860.12, 99.52, 0.000!!END! 369!X=680.95, 4860.12, 99.32, 0.000!!END! 370!X=680.15, 4860.14, 91.16, 0.000!!END! 371!X=680.17, 4860.14, 92.56, 0.000!!END! 372!X=680.19, 4860.14, 93.07, 0.000!!END! 373!X=680.21, 4860.14, 93.05, 0.000!!END! 374!X=680.23, 4860.14, 93.02, 0.000!!END! 375!X=680.25, 4860.14, 93.1, 0.000!!END! 376!X=680.27, 4860.14, 93.45, 0.000!!END! 377!X=680.29, 4860.14, 93.81, 0.000!!END! 378!X=680.31, 4860.14, 94.17, 0.000!!END! 379!X=680.33, 4860.14, 94.68, 0.000!!END! 380!X=680.35, 4860.14, 95.22, 0.000!!END! 381!X=680.37, 4860.14, 95.76, 0.000!!END! 382!X=680.39, 4860.14, 96, 0.000!!END! 383!X=680.41, 4860.14, 96, 0.000!!END! 384!X=680.43, 4860.14, 96, 0.000!!END! 385!X=680.45, 4860.14, 95.96, 0.000!!END! 386!X=680.47, 4860.14, 95.77, 0.000!!END! 387!X=680.49, 4860.14, 95.57, 0.000!!END! 388!X=680.51, 4860.14, 95.37, 0.000!!END! 389!X=680.53, 4860.14, 95.42, 0.000!!END! 390!X=680.55, 4860.14, 95.51, 0.000!!END! 391!X=680.57, 4860.14, 95.61, 0.000!!END! 392!X=680.59, 4860.14, 95.91, 0.000!!END! 393!X=680.61, 4860.14, 96.39, 0.000!!END! 394!X=680.67, 4860.14, 96.94, 0.000!!END! 395!X=680.69, 4860.14, 96.68, 0.000!!END! 396!X=680.71, 4860.14, 96.43, 0.000!!END! 397!X=680.73, 4860.14, 97.03, 0.000!!END! 398!X=680.75, 4860.14, 97.81, 0.000!!END! 399!X=680.77, 4860.14, 98.59, 0.000!!END! 400!X=680.79, 4860.14, 99.08, 0.000!!END! 401!X=680.81, 4860.14, 99.26, 0.000!!END! 402!X=680.83, 4860.14, 99.43, 0.000!!END! 403!X=680.85, 4860.14, 99.57, 0.000!!END! 404!X=680.87, 4860.14, 99.52, 0.000!!END! 405!X=680.89, 4860.14, 99.48, 0.000!!END! 406!X=680.91, 4860.14, 99.45, 0.000!!END! 407!X=680.93, 4860.14, 99.35, 0.000!!END! 408!X=680.95, 4860.14, 99.21, 0.000!!END! 409!X=680.15, 4860.16, 91.97, 0.000!!END! 410!X=680.17, 4860.16, 93.44, 0.000!!END! 411!X=680.19, 4860.16, 93.93, 0.000!!END! 412!X=680.21, 4860.16, 93.91, 0.000!!END! 413!X=680.23, 4860.16, 93.89, 0.000!!END! 414!X=680.25, 4860.16, 93.96, 0.000!!END! 415!X=680.27, 4860.16, 94.24, 0.000!!END! 416!X=680.29, 4860.16, 94.54, 0.000!!END! 417!X=680.31, 4860.16, 94.83, 0.000!!END! 418!X=680.33, 4860.16, 95.16, 0.000!!END! 419!X=680.35, 4860.16, 95.5, 0.000!!END! 420!X=680.37, 4860.16, 95.86, 0.000!!END! 421!X=680.39, 4860.16, 96, 0.000!!END! 422!X=680.41, 4860.16, 96, 0.000!!END! 423!X=680.43, 4860.16, 96, 0.000!!END! 424!X=680.45, 4860.16, 95.99, 0.000!!END! 425!X=680.47, 4860.16, 95.93, 0.000!!END! 426!X=680.49, 4860.16, 95.86, 0.000!!END! 427!X=680.51, 4860.16, 95.79, 0.000!!END! Page 496 2. CALPUFF.INP 46 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 428!X=680.53, 4860.16, 95.8, 0.000!!END! 429!X=680.55, 4860.16, 95.82, 0.000!!END! 430!X=680.67, 4860.16, 97.14, 0.000!!END! 431!X=680.69, 4860.16, 96.68, 0.000!!END! 432!X=680.71, 4860.16, 96.24, 0.000!!END! 433!X=680.73, 4860.16, 96.89, 0.000!!END! 434!X=680.75, 4860.16, 97.74, 0.000!!END! 435!X=680.77, 4860.16, 98.58, 0.000!!END! 436!X=680.79, 4860.16, 99.12, 0.000!!END! 437!X=680.81, 4860.16, 99.36, 0.000!!END! 438!X=680.83, 4860.16, 99.59, 0.000!!END! 439!X=680.85, 4860.16, 99.76, 0.000!!END! 440!X=680.87, 4860.16, 99.59, 0.000!!END! 441!X=680.89, 4860.16, 99.42, 0.000!!END! 442!X=680.91, 4860.16, 99.26, 0.000!!END! 443!X=680.93, 4860.16, 99.18, 0.000!!END! 444!X=680.95, 4860.16, 99.11, 0.000!!END! 445!X=680.15, 4860.18, 92.2, 0.000!!END! 446!X=680.17, 4860.18, 93.56, 0.000!!END! 447!X=680.19, 4860.18, 94.08, 0.000!!END! 448!X=680.21, 4860.18, 94.19, 0.000!!END! 449!X=680.23, 4860.18, 94.3, 0.000!!END! 450!X=680.25, 4860.18, 94.44, 0.000!!END! 451!X=680.27, 4860.18, 94.68, 0.000!!END! 452!X=680.29, 4860.18, 94.92, 0.000!!END! 453!X=680.31, 4860.18, 95.16, 0.000!!END! 454!X=680.33, 4860.18, 95.36, 0.000!!END! 455!X=680.35, 4860.18, 95.56, 0.000!!END! 456!X=680.37, 4860.18, 95.78, 0.000!!END! 457!X=680.39, 4860.18, 95.91, 0.000!!END! 458!X=680.41, 4860.18, 96, 0.000!!END! 459!X=680.43, 4860.18, 96.07, 0.000!!END! 460!X=680.45, 4860.18, 96.15, 0.000!!END! 461!X=680.47, 4860.18, 96.25, 0.000!!END! 462!X=680.49, 4860.18, 96.34, 0.000!!END! 463!X=680.67, 4860.18, 97.46, 0.000!!END! 464!X=680.69, 4860.18, 96.86, 0.000!!END! 465!X=680.71, 4860.18, 96.26, 0.000!!END! 466!X=680.73, 4860.18, 96.94, 0.000!!END! 467!X=680.75, 4860.18, 97.8, 0.000!!END! 468!X=680.77, 4860.18, 98.67, 0.000!!END! 469!X=680.79, 4860.18, 99.21, 0.000!!END! 470!X=680.81, 4860.18, 99.48, 0.000!!END! 471!X=680.83, 4860.18, 99.75, 0.000!!END! 472!X=680.85, 4860.18, 99.94, 0.000!!END! 473!X=680.87, 4860.18, 99.65, 0.000!!END! 474!X=680.89, 4860.18, 99.35, 0.000!!END! 475!X=680.91, 4860.18, 99.06, 0.000!!END! 476!X=680.93, 4860.18, 99.01, 0.000!!END! 477!X=680.95, 4860.18, 99.01, 0.000!!END! 478!X=680.15, 4860.2, 92.4, 0.000!!END! 479!X=680.17, 4860.2, 93.64, 0.000!!END! 480!X=680.19, 4860.2, 94.18, 0.000!!END! 481!X=680.21, 4860.2, 94.42, 0.000!!END! 482!X=680.23, 4860.2, 94.65, 0.000!!END! 483!X=680.25, 4860.2, 94.86, 0.000!!END! 484!X=680.27, 4860.2, 95.03, 0.000!!END! 485!X=680.29, 4860.2, 95.2, 0.000!!END! 486!X=680.31, 4860.2, 95.38, 0.000!!END! 487!X=680.33, 4860.2, 95.45, 0.000!!END! 488!X=680.35, 4860.2, 95.53, 0.000!!END! 489!X=680.37, 4860.2, 95.61, 0.000!!END! 490!X=680.39, 4860.2, 95.78, 0.000!!END! 491!X=680.41, 4860.2, 96, 0.000!!END! 492!X=680.43, 4860.2, 96.2, 0.000!!END! 493!X=680.69, 4860.2, 97.64, 0.000!!END! Page 497 2. CALPUFF.INP 47 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 494!X=680.71, 4860.2, 97.1, 0.000!!END! 495!X=680.73, 4860.2, 97.77, 0.000!!END! 496!X=680.75, 4860.2, 98.57, 0.000!!END! 497!X=680.77, 4860.2, 99.37, 0.000!!END! 498!X=680.79, 4860.2, 99.72, 0.000!!END! 499!X=680.81, 4860.2, 99.73, 0.000!!END! 500!X=680.83, 4860.2, 99.75, 0.000!!END! 501!X=680.85, 4860.2, 99.73, 0.000!!END! 502!X=680.87, 4860.2, 99.5, 0.000!!END! 503!X=680.89, 4860.2, 99.27, 0.000!!END! 504!X=680.91, 4860.2, 99.03, 0.000!!END! 505!X=680.93, 4860.2, 99.1, 0.000!!END! 506!X=680.95, 4860.2, 99.21, 0.000!!END! 507!X=680.15, 4860.22, 92.6, 0.000!!END! 508!X=680.17, 4860.22, 93.71, 0.000!!END! 509!X=680.19, 4860.22, 94.28, 0.000!!END! 510!X=680.21, 4860.22, 94.65, 0.000!!END! 511!X=680.23, 4860.22, 95.01, 0.000!!END! 512!X=680.25, 4860.22, 95.27, 0.000!!END! 513!X=680.27, 4860.22, 95.38, 0.000!!END! 514!X=680.29, 4860.22, 95.49, 0.000!!END! 515!X=680.31, 4860.22, 95.59, 0.000!!END! 516!X=680.33, 4860.22, 95.53, 0.000!!END! 517!X=680.35, 4860.22, 95.48, 0.000!!END! 518!X=680.37, 4860.22, 95.44, 0.000!!END! 519!X=680.39, 4860.22, 95.66, 0.000!!END! 520!X=680.41, 4860.22, 96, 0.000!!END! 521!X=680.69, 4860.22, 98.42, 0.000!!END! 522!X=680.71, 4860.22, 97.94, 0.000!!END! 523!X=680.73, 4860.22, 98.59, 0.000!!END! 524!X=680.75, 4860.22, 99.33, 0.000!!END! 525!X=680.77, 4860.22, 100.07, 0.000!!END! 526!X=680.79, 4860.22, 100.22, 0.000!!END! 527!X=680.81, 4860.22, 99.97, 0.000!!END! 528!X=680.83, 4860.22, 99.73, 0.000!!END! 529!X=680.85, 4860.22, 99.52, 0.000!!END! 530!X=680.87, 4860.22, 99.36, 0.000!!END! 531!X=680.89, 4860.22, 99.19, 0.000!!END! 532!X=680.91, 4860.22, 99.02, 0.000!!END! 533!X=680.93, 4860.22, 99.22, 0.000!!END! 534!X=680.95, 4860.22, 99.46, 0.000!!END! 535!X=680.15, 4860.24, 92.79, 0.000!!END! 536!X=680.17, 4860.24, 93.77, 0.000!!END! 537!X=680.19, 4860.24, 94.39, 0.000!!END! 538!X=680.21, 4860.24, 94.88, 0.000!!END! 539!X=680.23, 4860.24, 95.38, 0.000!!END! 540!X=680.25, 4860.24, 95.68, 0.000!!END! 541!X=680.27, 4860.24, 95.72, 0.000!!END! 542!X=680.29, 4860.24, 95.77, 0.000!!END! 543!X=680.31, 4860.24, 95.8, 0.000!!END! 544!X=680.33, 4860.24, 95.61, 0.000!!END! 545!X=680.35, 4860.24, 95.43, 0.000!!END! 546!X=680.37, 4860.24, 95.26, 0.000!!END! 547!X=680.39, 4860.24, 95.55, 0.000!!END! 548!X=680.41, 4860.24, 96.02, 0.000!!END! 549!X=680.69, 4860.24, 99.2, 0.000!!END! 550!X=680.71, 4860.24, 98.79, 0.000!!END! 551!X=680.73, 4860.24, 99.42, 0.000!!END! 552!X=680.75, 4860.24, 100.09, 0.000!!END! 553!X=680.77, 4860.24, 100.76, 0.000!!END! 554!X=680.79, 4860.24, 100.71, 0.000!!END! 555!X=680.81, 4860.24, 100.2, 0.000!!END! 556!X=680.83, 4860.24, 99.7, 0.000!!END! 557!X=680.85, 4860.24, 99.32, 0.000!!END! 558!X=680.87, 4860.24, 99.22, 0.000!!END! 559!X=680.89, 4860.24, 99.12, 0.000!!END! Page 498 2. CALPUFF.INP 48 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 560!X=680.91, 4860.24, 99.01, 0.000!!END! 561!X=680.93, 4860.24, 99.34, 0.000!!END! 562!X=680.95, 4860.24, 99.71, 0.000!!END! 563!X=680.15, 4860.26, 92.94, 0.000!!END! 564!X=680.17, 4860.26, 93.82, 0.000!!END! 565!X=680.19, 4860.26, 94.5, 0.000!!END! 566!X=680.21, 4860.26, 95.13, 0.000!!END! 567!X=680.23, 4860.26, 95.75, 0.000!!END! 568!X=680.25, 4860.26, 96.09, 0.000!!END! 569!X=680.27, 4860.26, 96.08, 0.000!!END! 570!X=680.29, 4860.26, 96.07, 0.000!!END! 571!X=680.31, 4860.26, 96.03, 0.000!!END! 572!X=680.33, 4860.26, 95.72, 0.000!!END! 573!X=680.35, 4860.26, 95.41, 0.000!!END! 574!X=680.37, 4860.26, 95.1, 0.000!!END! 575!X=680.39, 4860.26, 95.45, 0.000!!END! 576!X=680.69, 4860.26, 99.99, 0.000!!END! 577!X=680.71, 4860.26, 99.65, 0.000!!END! 578!X=680.73, 4860.26, 100.24, 0.000!!END! 579!X=680.75, 4860.26, 100.84, 0.000!!END! 580!X=680.77, 4860.26, 101.45, 0.000!!END! 581!X=680.79, 4860.26, 101.18, 0.000!!END! 582!X=680.81, 4860.26, 100.41, 0.000!!END! 583!X=680.83, 4860.26, 99.66, 0.000!!END! 584!X=680.85, 4860.26, 99.12, 0.000!!END! 585!X=680.87, 4860.26, 99.08, 0.000!!END! 586!X=680.89, 4860.26, 99.05, 0.000!!END! 587!X=680.91, 4860.26, 99, 0.000!!END! 588!X=680.93, 4860.26, 99.47, 0.000!!END! 589!X=680.95, 4860.26, 99.97, 0.000!!END! 590!X=680.15, 4860.28, 93.04, 0.000!!END! 591!X=680.17, 4860.28, 93.85, 0.000!!END! 592!X=680.19, 4860.28, 94.62, 0.000!!END! 593!X=680.21, 4860.28, 95.38, 0.000!!END! 594!X=680.23, 4860.28, 96.13, 0.000!!END! 595!X=680.25, 4860.28, 96.52, 0.000!!END! 596!X=680.27, 4860.28, 96.51, 0.000!!END! 597!X=680.29, 4860.28, 96.5, 0.000!!END! 598!X=680.31, 4860.28, 96.45, 0.000!!END! 599!X=680.33, 4860.28, 96.14, 0.000!!END! 600!X=680.35, 4860.28, 95.83, 0.000!!END! 601!X=680.37, 4860.28, 95.52, 0.000!!END! 602!X=680.39, 4860.28, 95.9, 0.000!!END! 603!X=680.71, 4860.28, 100.01, 0.000!!END! 604!X=680.73, 4860.28, 100.53, 0.000!!END! 605!X=680.75, 4860.28, 101.06, 0.000!!END! 606!X=680.77, 4860.28, 101.6, 0.000!!END! 607!X=680.79, 4860.28, 101.24, 0.000!!END! 608!X=680.81, 4860.28, 100.41, 0.000!!END! 609!X=680.83, 4860.28, 99.58, 0.000!!END! 610!X=680.85, 4860.28, 99.02, 0.000!!END! 611!X=680.87, 4860.28, 99.06, 0.000!!END! 612!X=680.89, 4860.28, 99.1, 0.000!!END! 613!X=680.91, 4860.28, 99.13, 0.000!!END! 614!X=680.93, 4860.28, 99.66, 0.000!!END! 615!X=680.95, 4860.28, 100.22, 0.000!!END! 616!X=680.15, 4860.3, 93.14, 0.000!!END! 617!X=680.17, 4860.3, 93.88, 0.000!!END! 618!X=680.19, 4860.3, 94.75, 0.000!!END! 619!X=680.21, 4860.3, 95.64, 0.000!!END! 620!X=680.23, 4860.3, 96.52, 0.000!!END! 621!X=680.25, 4860.3, 96.95, 0.000!!END! 622!X=680.27, 4860.3, 96.94, 0.000!!END! 623!X=680.29, 4860.3, 96.93, 0.000!!END! 624!X=680.31, 4860.3, 96.88, 0.000!!END! 625!X=680.33, 4860.3, 96.57, 0.000!!END! Page 499 2. CALPUFF.INP 49 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 626!X=680.35, 4860.3, 96.26, 0.000!!END! 627!X=680.37, 4860.3, 95.95, 0.000!!END! 628!X=680.39, 4860.3, 96.35, 0.000!!END! 629!X=680.73, 4860.3, 100.41, 0.000!!END! 630!X=680.75, 4860.3, 100.82, 0.000!!END! 631!X=680.77, 4860.3, 101.23, 0.000!!END! 632!X=680.79, 4860.3, 100.88, 0.000!!END! 633!X=680.81, 4860.3, 100.18, 0.000!!END! 634!X=680.83, 4860.3, 99.47, 0.000!!END! 635!X=680.85, 4860.3, 99.06, 0.000!!END! 636!X=680.87, 4860.3, 99.24, 0.000!!END! 637!X=680.89, 4860.3, 99.4, 0.000!!END! 638!X=680.91, 4860.3, 99.57, 0.000!!END! 639!X=680.93, 4860.3, 99.98, 0.000!!END! 640!X=680.95, 4860.3, 100.41, 0.000!!END! 641!X=680.15, 4860.32, 93.23, 0.000!!END! 642!X=680.17, 4860.32, 93.91, 0.000!!END! 643!X=680.19, 4860.32, 94.89, 0.000!!END! 644!X=680.21, 4860.32, 95.9, 0.000!!END! 645!X=680.23, 4860.32, 96.91, 0.000!!END! 646!X=680.25, 4860.32, 97.39, 0.000!!END! 647!X=680.27, 4860.32, 97.37, 0.000!!END! 648!X=680.29, 4860.32, 97.36, 0.000!!END! 649!X=680.31, 4860.32, 97.3, 0.000!!END! 650!X=680.33, 4860.32, 96.99, 0.000!!END! 651!X=680.35, 4860.32, 96.68, 0.000!!END! 652!X=680.37, 4860.32, 96.37, 0.000!!END! 653!X=680.73, 4860.32, 100.29, 0.000!!END! 654!X=680.75, 4860.32, 100.56, 0.000!!END! 655!X=680.77, 4860.32, 100.84, 0.000!!END! 656!X=680.79, 4860.32, 100.52, 0.000!!END! 657!X=680.81, 4860.32, 99.95, 0.000!!END! 658!X=680.83, 4860.32, 99.37, 0.000!!END! 659!X=680.85, 4860.32, 99.11, 0.000!!END! 660!X=680.87, 4860.32, 99.42, 0.000!!END! 661!X=680.89, 4860.32, 99.71, 0.000!!END! 662!X=680.91, 4860.32, 100, 0.000!!END! 663!X=680.93, 4860.32, 100.29, 0.000!!END! 664!X=680.95, 4860.32, 100.59, 0.000!!END! 665!X=680.15, 4860.34, 93.32, 0.000!!END! 666!X=680.17, 4860.34, 93.94, 0.000!!END! 667!X=680.19, 4860.34, 95.03, 0.000!!END! 668!X=680.21, 4860.34, 96.18, 0.000!!END! 669!X=680.23, 4860.34, 97.31, 0.000!!END! 670!X=680.25, 4860.34, 97.82, 0.000!!END! 671!X=680.27, 4860.34, 97.81, 0.000!!END! 672!X=680.29, 4860.34, 97.79, 0.000!!END! 673!X=680.31, 4860.34, 97.72, 0.000!!END! 674!X=680.33, 4860.34, 97.41, 0.000!!END! 675!X=680.35, 4860.34, 97.1, 0.000!!END! 676!X=680.37, 4860.34, 96.79, 0.000!!END! 677!X=680.71, 4860.34, 100.01, 0.000!!END! 678!X=680.73, 4860.34, 100.15, 0.000!!END! 679!X=680.75, 4860.34, 100.3, 0.000!!END! 680!X=680.77, 4860.34, 100.45, 0.000!!END! 681!X=680.79, 4860.34, 100.17, 0.000!!END! 682!X=680.81, 4860.34, 99.72, 0.000!!END! 683!X=680.83, 4860.34, 99.27, 0.000!!END! 684!X=680.85, 4860.34, 99.17, 0.000!!END! 685!X=680.87, 4860.34, 99.61, 0.000!!END! 686!X=680.89, 4860.34, 100.03, 0.000!!END! 687!X=680.91, 4860.34, 100.44, 0.000!!END! 688!X=680.93, 4860.34, 100.6, 0.000!!END! 689!X=680.95, 4860.34, 100.77, 0.000!!END! 690!X=680.15, 4860.36, 93.72, 0.000!!END! 691!X=680.17, 4860.36, 94.39, 0.000!!END! Page 500 2. CALPUFF.INP 50 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 692!X=680.19, 4860.36, 95.49, 0.000!!END! 693!X=680.21, 4860.36, 96.63, 0.000!!END! 694!X=680.23, 4860.36, 97.77, 0.000!!END! 695!X=680.25, 4860.36, 98.23, 0.000!!END! 696!X=680.27, 4860.36, 98.18, 0.000!!END! 697!X=680.29, 4860.36, 98.14, 0.000!!END! 698!X=680.31, 4860.36, 98.05, 0.000!!END! 699!X=680.33, 4860.36, 97.77, 0.000!!END! 700!X=680.35, 4860.36, 97.5, 0.000!!END! 701!X=680.37, 4860.36, 97.21, 0.000!!END! 702!X=680.71, 4860.36, 100, 0.000!!END! 703!X=680.73, 4860.36, 100.01, 0.000!!END! 704!X=680.75, 4860.36, 100.03, 0.000!!END! 705!X=680.77, 4860.36, 100.05, 0.000!!END! 706!X=680.79, 4860.36, 99.82, 0.000!!END! 707!X=680.81, 4860.36, 99.51, 0.000!!END! 708!X=680.83, 4860.36, 99.19, 0.000!!END! 709!X=680.85, 4860.36, 99.24, 0.000!!END! 710!X=680.87, 4860.36, 99.8, 0.000!!END! 711!X=680.89, 4860.36, 100.36, 0.000!!END! 712!X=680.91, 4860.36, 100.87, 0.000!!END! 713!X=680.93, 4860.36, 100.9, 0.000!!END! 714!X=680.95, 4860.36, 100.94, 0.000!!END! 715!X=680.15, 4860.38, 94.25, 0.000!!END! 716!X=680.17, 4860.38, 95.05, 0.000!!END! 717!X=680.19, 4860.38, 96.11, 0.000!!END! 718!X=680.21, 4860.38, 97.18, 0.000!!END! 719!X=680.23, 4860.38, 98.26, 0.000!!END! 720!X=680.25, 4860.38, 98.62, 0.000!!END! 721!X=680.27, 4860.38, 98.51, 0.000!!END! 722!X=680.29, 4860.38, 98.4, 0.000!!END! 723!X=680.31, 4860.38, 98.27, 0.000!!END! 724!X=680.33, 4860.38, 98.06, 0.000!!END! 725!X=680.35, 4860.38, 97.85, 0.000!!END! 726!X=680.71, 4860.38, 100.21, 0.000!!END! 727!X=680.73, 4860.38, 100.2, 0.000!!END! 728!X=680.75, 4860.38, 100.19, 0.000!!END! 729!X=680.77, 4860.38, 100.19, 0.000!!END! 730!X=680.79, 4860.38, 99.9, 0.000!!END! 731!X=680.81, 4860.38, 99.54, 0.000!!END! 732!X=680.83, 4860.38, 99.19, 0.000!!END! 733!X=680.85, 4860.38, 99.27, 0.000!!END! 734!X=680.87, 4860.38, 99.87, 0.000!!END! 735!X=680.89, 4860.38, 100.46, 0.000!!END! 736!X=680.91, 4860.38, 101, 0.000!!END! 737!X=680.93, 4860.38, 100.95, 0.000!!END! 738!X=680.95, 4860.38, 100.92, 0.000!!END! 739!X=680.15, 4860.4, 94.79, 0.000!!END! 740!X=680.17, 4860.4, 95.72, 0.000!!END! 741!X=680.19, 4860.4, 96.72, 0.000!!END! 742!X=680.21, 4860.4, 97.73, 0.000!!END! 743!X=680.23, 4860.4, 98.74, 0.000!!END! 744!X=680.25, 4860.4, 99.01, 0.000!!END! 745!X=680.27, 4860.4, 98.83, 0.000!!END! 746!X=680.29, 4860.4, 98.66, 0.000!!END! 747!X=680.31, 4860.4, 98.5, 0.000!!END! 748!X=680.33, 4860.4, 98.36, 0.000!!END! 749!X=680.35, 4860.4, 98.21, 0.000!!END! 750!X=680.69, 4860.4, 100.46, 0.000!!END! 751!X=680.71, 4860.4, 100.42, 0.000!!END! 752!X=680.73, 4860.4, 100.42, 0.000!!END! 753!X=680.75, 4860.4, 100.41, 0.000!!END! 754!X=680.77, 4860.4, 100.4, 0.000!!END! 755!X=680.79, 4860.4, 100.05, 0.000!!END! 756!X=680.81, 4860.4, 99.63, 0.000!!END! 757!X=680.83, 4860.4, 99.22, 0.000!!END! Page 501 2. CALPUFF.INP 51 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 758!X=680.85, 4860.4, 99.28, 0.000!!END! 759!X=680.87, 4860.4, 99.88, 0.000!!END! 760!X=680.89, 4860.4, 100.48, 0.000!!END! 761!X=680.91, 4860.4, 100.99, 0.000!!END! 762!X=680.93, 4860.4, 100.88, 0.000!!END! 763!X=680.95, 4860.4, 100.78, 0.000!!END! 764!X=680.15, 4860.42, 95.34, 0.000!!END! 765!X=680.17, 4860.42, 96.39, 0.000!!END! 766!X=680.19, 4860.42, 97.34, 0.000!!END! 767!X=680.21, 4860.42, 98.28, 0.000!!END! 768!X=680.23, 4860.42, 99.23, 0.000!!END! 769!X=680.25, 4860.42, 99.39, 0.000!!END! 770!X=680.27, 4860.42, 99.15, 0.000!!END! 771!X=680.29, 4860.42, 98.92, 0.000!!END! 772!X=680.31, 4860.42, 98.73, 0.000!!END! 773!X=680.33, 4860.42, 98.65, 0.000!!END! 774!X=680.35, 4860.42, 98.57, 0.000!!END! 775!X=680.69, 4860.42, 100.58, 0.000!!END! 776!X=680.71, 4860.42, 100.64, 0.000!!END! 777!X=680.73, 4860.42, 100.63, 0.000!!END! 778!X=680.75, 4860.42, 100.63, 0.000!!END! 779!X=680.77, 4860.42, 100.62, 0.000!!END! 780!X=680.79, 4860.42, 100.2, 0.000!!END! 781!X=680.81, 4860.42, 99.72, 0.000!!END! 782!X=680.83, 4860.42, 99.24, 0.000!!END! 783!X=680.85, 4860.42, 99.3, 0.000!!END! 784!X=680.87, 4860.42, 99.9, 0.000!!END! 785!X=680.89, 4860.42, 100.5, 0.000!!END! 786!X=680.91, 4860.42, 100.97, 0.000!!END! 787!X=680.93, 4860.42, 100.8, 0.000!!END! 788!X=680.95, 4860.42, 100.64, 0.000!!END! 789!X=680.15, 4860.44, 95.88, 0.000!!END! 790!X=680.17, 4860.44, 97.04, 0.000!!END! 791!X=680.19, 4860.44, 97.93, 0.000!!END! 792!X=680.21, 4860.44, 98.82, 0.000!!END! 793!X=680.23, 4860.44, 99.7, 0.000!!END! 794!X=680.25, 4860.44, 99.78, 0.000!!END! 795!X=680.27, 4860.44, 99.47, 0.000!!END! 796!X=680.29, 4860.44, 99.17, 0.000!!END! 797!X=680.31, 4860.44, 98.97, 0.000!!END! 798!X=680.33, 4860.44, 98.95, 0.000!!END! 799!X=680.35, 4860.44, 98.93, 0.000!!END! 800!X=680.69, 4860.44, 100.69, 0.000!!END! 801!X=680.71, 4860.44, 100.85, 0.000!!END! 802!X=680.73, 4860.44, 100.85, 0.000!!END! 803!X=680.75, 4860.44, 100.84, 0.000!!END! 804!X=680.77, 4860.44, 100.84, 0.000!!END! 805!X=680.79, 4860.44, 100.35, 0.000!!END! 806!X=680.81, 4860.44, 99.8, 0.000!!END! 807!X=680.83, 4860.44, 99.25, 0.000!!END! 808!X=680.85, 4860.44, 99.32, 0.000!!END! 809!X=680.87, 4860.44, 99.91, 0.000!!END! 810!X=680.89, 4860.44, 100.51, 0.000!!END! 811!X=680.91, 4860.44, 100.96, 0.000!!END! 812!X=680.93, 4860.44, 100.72, 0.000!!END! 813!X=680.95, 4860.44, 100.49, 0.000!!END! 814!X=680.15, 4860.46, 96.31, 0.000!!END! 815!X=680.17, 4860.46, 97.27, 0.000!!END! 816!X=680.19, 4860.46, 98.03, 0.000!!END! 817!X=680.21, 4860.46, 98.8, 0.000!!END! 818!X=680.23, 4860.46, 99.57, 0.000!!END! 819!X=680.25, 4860.46, 99.67, 0.000!!END! 820!X=680.27, 4860.46, 99.49, 0.000!!END! 821!X=680.29, 4860.46, 99.31, 0.000!!END! 822!X=680.31, 4860.46, 99.11, 0.000!!END! 823!X=680.33, 4860.46, 98.89, 0.000!!END! Page 502 2. CALPUFF.INP 52 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 824!X=680.67, 4860.46, 100.61, 0.000!!END! 825!X=680.69, 4860.46, 100.83, 0.000!!END! 826!X=680.71, 4860.46, 101.01, 0.000!!END! 827!X=680.73, 4860.46, 101.05, 0.000!!END! 828!X=680.75, 4860.46, 101.08, 0.000!!END! 829!X=680.77, 4860.46, 101.1, 0.000!!END! 830!X=680.79, 4860.46, 100.57, 0.000!!END! 831!X=680.81, 4860.46, 99.99, 0.000!!END! 832!X=680.83, 4860.46, 99.39, 0.000!!END! 833!X=680.85, 4860.46, 99.44, 0.000!!END! 834!X=680.87, 4860.46, 100, 0.000!!END! 835!X=680.89, 4860.46, 100.57, 0.000!!END! 836!X=680.91, 4860.46, 100.96, 0.000!!END! 837!X=680.93, 4860.46, 100.65, 0.000!!END! 838!X=680.95, 4860.46, 100.34, 0.000!!END! 839!X=680.15, 4860.48, 96.73, 0.000!!END! 840!X=680.17, 4860.48, 97.5, 0.000!!END! 841!X=680.19, 4860.48, 98.13, 0.000!!END! 842!X=680.21, 4860.48, 98.76, 0.000!!END! 843!X=680.23, 4860.48, 99.41, 0.000!!END! 844!X=680.25, 4860.48, 99.54, 0.000!!END! 845!X=680.27, 4860.48, 99.5, 0.000!!END! 846!X=680.29, 4860.48, 99.44, 0.000!!END! 847!X=680.31, 4860.48, 99.22, 0.000!!END! 848!X=680.33, 4860.48, 98.74, 0.000!!END! 849!X=680.67, 4860.48, 100.94, 0.000!!END! 850!X=680.69, 4860.48, 100.97, 0.000!!END! 851!X=680.71, 4860.48, 101.05, 0.000!!END! 852!X=680.73, 4860.48, 101.21, 0.000!!END! 853!X=680.75, 4860.48, 101.37, 0.000!!END! 854!X=680.77, 4860.48, 101.53, 0.000!!END! 855!X=680.79, 4860.48, 101.11, 0.000!!END! 856!X=680.81, 4860.48, 100.65, 0.000!!END! 857!X=680.83, 4860.48, 100.19, 0.000!!END! 858!X=680.85, 4860.48, 100.24, 0.000!!END! 859!X=680.87, 4860.48, 100.67, 0.000!!END! 860!X=680.89, 4860.48, 101.12, 0.000!!END! 861!X=680.91, 4860.48, 101.37, 0.000!!END! 862!X=680.93, 4860.48, 100.99, 0.000!!END! 863!X=680.95, 4860.48, 100.62, 0.000!!END! 864!X=680.15, 4860.5, 97.14, 0.000!!END! 865!X=680.17, 4860.5, 97.72, 0.000!!END! 866!X=680.19, 4860.5, 98.22, 0.000!!END! 867!X=680.21, 4860.5, 98.72, 0.000!!END! 868!X=680.23, 4860.5, 99.24, 0.000!!END! 869!X=680.25, 4860.5, 99.43, 0.000!!END! 870!X=680.27, 4860.5, 99.51, 0.000!!END! 871!X=680.29, 4860.5, 99.58, 0.000!!END! 872!X=680.31, 4860.5, 99.31, 0.000!!END! 873!X=680.33, 4860.5, 98.58, 0.000!!END! 874!X=680.35, 4860.5, 97.86, 0.000!!END! 875!X=680.67, 4860.5, 101.27, 0.000!!END! 876!X=680.69, 4860.5, 101.11, 0.000!!END! 877!X=680.71, 4860.5, 101.09, 0.000!!END! 878!X=680.73, 4860.5, 101.39, 0.000!!END! 879!X=680.75, 4860.5, 101.68, 0.000!!END! 880!X=680.77, 4860.5, 101.96, 0.000!!END! 881!X=680.79, 4860.5, 101.66, 0.000!!END! 882!X=680.81, 4860.5, 101.32, 0.000!!END! 883!X=680.83, 4860.5, 100.99, 0.000!!END! 884!X=680.85, 4860.5, 101.04, 0.000!!END! 885!X=680.87, 4860.5, 101.34, 0.000!!END! 886!X=680.89, 4860.5, 101.65, 0.000!!END! 887!X=680.91, 4860.5, 101.77, 0.000!!END! 888!X=680.93, 4860.5, 101.33, 0.000!!END! 889!X=680.95, 4860.5, 100.89, 0.000!!END! Page 503 2. CALPUFF.INP 53 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 890!X=680.15, 4860.52, 97.53, 0.000!!END! 891!X=680.17, 4860.52, 97.93, 0.000!!END! 892!X=680.19, 4860.52, 98.3, 0.000!!END! 893!X=680.21, 4860.52, 98.68, 0.000!!END! 894!X=680.23, 4860.52, 99.06, 0.000!!END! 895!X=680.25, 4860.52, 99.31, 0.000!!END! 896!X=680.27, 4860.52, 99.52, 0.000!!END! 897!X=680.29, 4860.52, 99.73, 0.000!!END! 898!X=680.31, 4860.52, 99.39, 0.000!!END! 899!X=680.33, 4860.52, 98.4, 0.000!!END! 900!X=680.35, 4860.52, 97.42, 0.000!!END! 901!X=680.37, 4860.52, 96.61, 0.000!!END! 902!X=680.39, 4860.52, 97.28, 0.000!!END! 903!X=680.41, 4860.52, 97.95, 0.000!!END! 904!X=680.65, 4860.52, 101.96, 0.000!!END! 905!X=680.67, 4860.52, 101.59, 0.000!!END! 906!X=680.69, 4860.52, 101.23, 0.000!!END! 907!X=680.71, 4860.52, 101.15, 0.000!!END! 908!X=680.73, 4860.52, 101.57, 0.000!!END! 909!X=680.75, 4860.52, 101.99, 0.000!!END! 910!X=680.77, 4860.52, 102.4, 0.000!!END! 911!X=680.79, 4860.52, 102.21, 0.000!!END! 912!X=680.81, 4860.52, 102, 0.000!!END! 913!X=680.83, 4860.52, 101.8, 0.000!!END! 914!X=680.85, 4860.52, 101.83, 0.000!!END! 915!X=680.87, 4860.52, 102, 0.000!!END! 916!X=680.89, 4860.52, 102.19, 0.000!!END! 917!X=680.91, 4860.52, 102.17, 0.000!!END! 918!X=680.93, 4860.52, 101.67, 0.000!!END! 919!X=680.95, 4860.52, 101.17, 0.000!!END! 920!X=680.15, 4860.54, 97.97, 0.000!!END! 921!X=680.17, 4860.54, 98.23, 0.000!!END! 922!X=680.19, 4860.54, 98.52, 0.000!!END! 923!X=680.21, 4860.54, 98.81, 0.000!!END! 924!X=680.23, 4860.54, 99.09, 0.000!!END! 925!X=680.25, 4860.54, 99.38, 0.000!!END! 926!X=680.27, 4860.54, 99.67, 0.000!!END! 927!X=680.29, 4860.54, 99.95, 0.000!!END! 928!X=680.31, 4860.54, 99.57, 0.000!!END! 929!X=680.33, 4860.54, 98.41, 0.000!!END! 930!X=680.35, 4860.54, 97.24, 0.000!!END! 931!X=680.37, 4860.54, 96.27, 0.000!!END! 932!X=680.39, 4860.54, 96.8, 0.000!!END! 933!X=680.41, 4860.54, 97.35, 0.000!!END! 934!X=680.43, 4860.54, 97.91, 0.000!!END! 935!X=680.45, 4860.54, 98.26, 0.000!!END! 936!X=680.47, 4860.54, 98.54, 0.000!!END! 937!X=680.65, 4860.54, 102.46, 0.000!!END! 938!X=680.67, 4860.54, 101.89, 0.000!!END! 939!X=680.69, 4860.54, 101.34, 0.000!!END! 940!X=680.71, 4860.54, 101.21, 0.000!!END! 941!X=680.73, 4860.54, 101.76, 0.000!!END! 942!X=680.75, 4860.54, 102.3, 0.000!!END! 943!X=680.77, 4860.54, 102.83, 0.000!!END! 944!X=680.79, 4860.54, 102.76, 0.000!!END! 945!X=680.81, 4860.54, 102.69, 0.000!!END! 946!X=680.83, 4860.54, 102.61, 0.000!!END! 947!X=680.85, 4860.54, 102.61, 0.000!!END! 948!X=680.87, 4860.54, 102.66, 0.000!!END! 949!X=680.89, 4860.54, 102.71, 0.000!!END! 950!X=680.91, 4860.54, 102.57, 0.000!!END! 951!X=680.93, 4860.54, 102, 0.000!!END! 952!X=680.95, 4860.54, 101.44, 0.000!!END! 953!X=680.15, 4860.56, 98.46, 0.000!!END! 954!X=680.17, 4860.56, 98.67, 0.000!!END! 955!X=680.19, 4860.56, 98.96, 0.000!!END! Page 504 2. CALPUFF.INP 54 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 956!X=680.21, 4860.56, 99.25, 0.000!!END! 957!X=680.23, 4860.56, 99.53, 0.000!!END! 958!X=680.25, 4860.56, 99.82, 0.000!!END! 959!X=680.27, 4860.56, 100.11, 0.000!!END! 960!X=680.29, 4860.56, 100.39, 0.000!!END! 961!X=680.31, 4860.56, 100.1, 0.000!!END! 962!X=680.33, 4860.56, 99.2, 0.000!!END! 963!X=680.35, 4860.56, 98.29, 0.000!!END! 964!X=680.37, 4860.56, 97.55, 0.000!!END! 965!X=680.39, 4860.56, 97.89, 0.000!!END! 966!X=680.41, 4860.56, 98.25, 0.000!!END! 967!X=680.43, 4860.56, 98.61, 0.000!!END! 968!X=680.45, 4860.56, 98.91, 0.000!!END! 969!X=680.47, 4860.56, 99.2, 0.000!!END! 970!X=680.49, 4860.56, 99.48, 0.000!!END! 971!X=680.51, 4860.56, 99.78, 0.000!!END! 972!X=680.53, 4860.56, 100.12, 0.000!!END! 973!X=680.65, 4860.56, 102.81, 0.000!!END! 974!X=680.67, 4860.56, 102.11, 0.000!!END! 975!X=680.69, 4860.56, 101.42, 0.000!!END! 976!X=680.71, 4860.56, 101.2, 0.000!!END! 977!X=680.73, 4860.56, 101.71, 0.000!!END! 978!X=680.75, 4860.56, 102.23, 0.000!!END! 979!X=680.77, 4860.56, 102.74, 0.000!!END! 980!X=680.79, 4860.56, 102.75, 0.000!!END! 981!X=680.81, 4860.56, 102.76, 0.000!!END! 982!X=680.83, 4860.56, 102.77, 0.000!!END! 983!X=680.85, 4860.56, 102.76, 0.000!!END! 984!X=680.87, 4860.56, 102.74, 0.000!!END! 985!X=680.89, 4860.56, 102.73, 0.000!!END! 986!X=680.91, 4860.56, 102.51, 0.000!!END! 987!X=680.93, 4860.56, 101.91, 0.000!!END! 988!X=680.95, 4860.56, 101.31, 0.000!!END! 989!X=680.15, 4860.58, 98.95, 0.000!!END! 990!X=680.17, 4860.58, 99.11, 0.000!!END! 991!X=680.19, 4860.58, 99.4, 0.000!!END! 992!X=680.21, 4860.58, 99.69, 0.000!!END! 993!X=680.23, 4860.58, 99.97, 0.000!!END! 994!X=680.25, 4860.58, 100.26, 0.000!!END! 995!X=680.27, 4860.58, 100.55, 0.000!!END! 996!X=680.29, 4860.58, 100.83, 0.000!!END! 997!X=680.31, 4860.58, 100.64, 0.000!!END! 998!X=680.33, 4860.58, 100, 0.000!!END! 999!X=680.35, 4860.58, 99.35, 0.000!!END! 1000!X=680.37, 4860.58, 98.82, 0.000!!END! 1001!X=680.39, 4860.58, 98.97, 0.000!!END! 1002!X=680.41, 4860.58, 99.13, 0.000!!END! 1003!X=680.43, 4860.58, 99.31, 0.000!!END! 1004!X=680.45, 4860.58, 99.57, 0.000!!END! 1005!X=680.47, 4860.58, 99.85, 0.000!!END! 1006!X=680.49, 4860.58, 100.13, 0.000!!END! 1007!X=680.51, 4860.58, 100.47, 0.000!!END! 1008!X=680.53, 4860.58, 100.88, 0.000!!END! 1009!X=680.55, 4860.58, 101.28, 0.000!!END! 1010!X=680.57, 4860.58, 101.71, 0.000!!END! 1011!X=680.59, 4860.58, 102.34, 0.000!!END! 1012!X=680.63, 4860.58, 103.63, 0.000!!END! 1013!X=680.65, 4860.58, 103.13, 0.000!!END! 1014!X=680.67, 4860.58, 102.3, 0.000!!END! 1015!X=680.69, 4860.58, 101.47, 0.000!!END! 1016!X=680.71, 4860.58, 101.16, 0.000!!END! 1017!X=680.73, 4860.58, 101.54, 0.000!!END! 1018!X=680.75, 4860.58, 101.94, 0.000!!END! 1019!X=680.77, 4860.58, 102.31, 0.000!!END! 1020!X=680.79, 4860.58, 102.32, 0.000!!END! 1021!X=680.81, 4860.58, 102.33, 0.000!!END! Page 505 2. CALPUFF.INP 55 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1022!X=680.83, 4860.58, 102.34, 0.000!!END! 1023!X=680.85, 4860.58, 102.28, 0.000!!END! 1024!X=680.87, 4860.58, 102.2, 0.000!!END! 1025!X=680.89, 4860.58, 102.12, 0.000!!END! 1026!X=680.91, 4860.58, 101.82, 0.000!!END! 1027!X=680.93, 4860.58, 101.16, 0.000!!END! 1028!X=680.95, 4860.58, 100.49, 0.000!!END! 1029!X=680.15, 4860.6, 99.43, 0.000!!END! 1030!X=680.17, 4860.6, 99.55, 0.000!!END! 1031!X=680.19, 4860.6, 99.84, 0.000!!END! 1032!X=680.21, 4860.6, 100.13, 0.000!!END! 1033!X=680.23, 4860.6, 100.41, 0.000!!END! 1034!X=680.25, 4860.6, 100.7, 0.000!!END! 1035!X=680.27, 4860.6, 100.99, 0.000!!END! 1036!X=680.29, 4860.6, 101.27, 0.000!!END! 1037!X=680.31, 4860.6, 101.2, 0.000!!END! 1038!X=680.33, 4860.6, 100.82, 0.000!!END! 1039!X=680.35, 4860.6, 100.42, 0.000!!END! 1040!X=680.37, 4860.6, 100.08, 0.000!!END! 1041!X=680.39, 4860.6, 100.04, 0.000!!END! 1042!X=680.41, 4860.6, 100.01, 0.000!!END! 1043!X=680.43, 4860.6, 99.99, 0.000!!END! 1044!X=680.45, 4860.6, 100.23, 0.000!!END! 1045!X=680.47, 4860.6, 100.51, 0.000!!END! 1046!X=680.49, 4860.6, 100.79, 0.000!!END! 1047!X=680.51, 4860.6, 101.16, 0.000!!END! 1048!X=680.53, 4860.6, 101.63, 0.000!!END! 1049!X=680.55, 4860.6, 102.1, 0.000!!END! 1050!X=680.57, 4860.6, 102.57, 0.000!!END! 1051!X=680.59, 4860.6, 103.07, 0.000!!END! 1052!X=680.61, 4860.6, 103.58, 0.000!!END! 1053!X=680.63, 4860.6, 104.1, 0.000!!END! 1054!X=680.65, 4860.6, 103.43, 0.000!!END! 1055!X=680.67, 4860.6, 102.47, 0.000!!END! 1056!X=680.69, 4860.6, 101.52, 0.000!!END! 1057!X=680.71, 4860.6, 101.11, 0.000!!END! 1058!X=680.73, 4860.6, 101.37, 0.000!!END! 1059!X=680.75, 4860.6, 101.63, 0.000!!END! 1060!X=680.77, 4860.6, 101.87, 0.000!!END! 1061!X=680.79, 4860.6, 101.89, 0.000!!END! 1062!X=680.81, 4860.6, 101.9, 0.000!!END! 1063!X=680.83, 4860.6, 101.91, 0.000!!END! 1064!X=680.85, 4860.6, 101.8, 0.000!!END! 1065!X=680.87, 4860.6, 101.65, 0.000!!END! 1066!X=680.89, 4860.6, 101.51, 0.000!!END! 1067!X=680.91, 4860.6, 101.13, 0.000!!END! 1068!X=680.93, 4860.6, 100.4, 0.000!!END! 1069!X=680.95, 4860.6, 99.67, 0.000!!END! 1070!X=680.15, 4860.62, 99.91, 0.000!!END! 1071!X=680.17, 4860.62, 99.99, 0.000!!END! 1072!X=680.19, 4860.62, 100.28, 0.000!!END! 1073!X=680.21, 4860.62, 100.57, 0.000!!END! 1074!X=680.23, 4860.62, 100.85, 0.000!!END! 1075!X=680.25, 4860.62, 101.14, 0.000!!END! 1076!X=680.27, 4860.62, 101.43, 0.000!!END! 1077!X=680.29, 4860.62, 101.71, 0.000!!END! 1078!X=680.31, 4860.62, 101.77, 0.000!!END! 1079!X=680.33, 4860.62, 101.64, 0.000!!END! 1080!X=680.35, 4860.62, 101.51, 0.000!!END! 1081!X=680.37, 4860.62, 101.33, 0.000!!END! 1082!X=680.39, 4860.62, 101.1, 0.000!!END! 1083!X=680.41, 4860.62, 100.87, 0.000!!END! 1084!X=680.43, 4860.62, 100.66, 0.000!!END! 1085!X=680.45, 4860.62, 100.88, 0.000!!END! 1086!X=680.47, 4860.62, 101.16, 0.000!!END! 1087!X=680.49, 4860.62, 101.44, 0.000!!END! Page 506 2. CALPUFF.INP 56 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1088!X=680.51, 4860.62, 101.86, 0.000!!END! 1089!X=680.53, 4860.62, 102.39, 0.000!!END! 1090!X=680.55, 4860.62, 102.92, 0.000!!END! 1091!X=680.57, 4860.62, 103.42, 0.000!!END! 1092!X=680.59, 4860.62, 103.8, 0.000!!END! 1093!X=680.61, 4860.62, 104.18, 0.000!!END! 1094!X=680.63, 4860.62, 104.57, 0.000!!END! 1095!X=680.65, 4860.62, 103.73, 0.000!!END! 1096!X=680.67, 4860.62, 102.64, 0.000!!END! 1097!X=680.69, 4860.62, 101.56, 0.000!!END! 1098!X=680.71, 4860.62, 101.06, 0.000!!END! 1099!X=680.73, 4860.62, 101.18, 0.000!!END! 1100!X=680.75, 4860.62, 101.32, 0.000!!END! 1101!X=680.77, 4860.62, 101.44, 0.000!!END! 1102!X=680.79, 4860.62, 101.45, 0.000!!END! 1103!X=680.81, 4860.62, 101.46, 0.000!!END! 1104!X=680.83, 4860.62, 101.48, 0.000!!END! 1105!X=680.85, 4860.62, 101.31, 0.000!!END! 1106!X=680.87, 4860.62, 101.1, 0.000!!END! 1107!X=680.89, 4860.62, 100.9, 0.000!!END! 1108!X=680.91, 4860.62, 100.44, 0.000!!END! 1109!X=680.93, 4860.62, 99.64, 0.000!!END! 1110!X=680.95, 4860.62, 98.85, 0.000!!END! 1111!X=680.15, 4860.64, 100.28, 0.000!!END! 1112!X=680.17, 4860.64, 100.42, 0.000!!END! 1113!X=680.19, 4860.64, 100.66, 0.000!!END! 1114!X=680.21, 4860.64, 100.9, 0.000!!END! 1115!X=680.23, 4860.64, 101.14, 0.000!!END! 1116!X=680.25, 4860.64, 101.35, 0.000!!END! 1117!X=680.27, 4860.64, 101.56, 0.000!!END! 1118!X=680.29, 4860.64, 101.78, 0.000!!END! 1119!X=680.31, 4860.64, 101.87, 0.000!!END! 1120!X=680.33, 4860.64, 101.88, 0.000!!END! 1121!X=680.35, 4860.64, 101.88, 0.000!!END! 1122!X=680.37, 4860.64, 101.83, 0.000!!END! 1123!X=680.39, 4860.64, 101.6, 0.000!!END! 1124!X=680.41, 4860.64, 101.36, 0.000!!END! 1125!X=680.43, 4860.64, 101.12, 0.000!!END! 1126!X=680.45, 4860.64, 101.36, 0.000!!END! 1127!X=680.47, 4860.64, 101.65, 0.000!!END! 1128!X=680.49, 4860.64, 101.94, 0.000!!END! 1129!X=680.51, 4860.64, 102.38, 0.000!!END! 1130!X=680.53, 4860.64, 102.93, 0.000!!END! 1131!X=680.55, 4860.64, 103.49, 0.000!!END! 1132!X=680.57, 4860.64, 104.01, 0.000!!END! 1133!X=680.59, 4860.64, 104.33, 0.000!!END! 1134!X=680.61, 4860.64, 104.64, 0.000!!END! 1135!X=680.63, 4860.64, 104.95, 0.000!!END! 1136!X=680.65, 4860.64, 104, 0.000!!END! 1137!X=680.67, 4860.64, 102.81, 0.000!!END! 1138!X=680.69, 4860.64, 101.62, 0.000!!END! 1139!X=680.71, 4860.64, 101.02, 0.000!!END! 1140!X=680.73, 4860.64, 101.01, 0.000!!END! 1141!X=680.75, 4860.64, 101, 0.000!!END! 1142!X=680.77, 4860.64, 101.01, 0.000!!END! 1143!X=680.79, 4860.64, 101.02, 0.000!!END! 1144!X=680.81, 4860.64, 101.03, 0.000!!END! 1145!X=680.83, 4860.64, 101.04, 0.000!!END! 1146!X=680.85, 4860.64, 100.82, 0.000!!END! 1147!X=680.87, 4860.64, 100.55, 0.000!!END! 1148!X=680.89, 4860.64, 100.28, 0.000!!END! 1149!X=680.91, 4860.64, 99.74, 0.000!!END! 1150!X=680.93, 4860.64, 98.88, 0.000!!END! 1151!X=680.95, 4860.64, 98.02, 0.000!!END! 1152!X=680.15, 4860.66, 100.63, 0.000!!END! 1153!X=680.17, 4860.66, 100.84, 0.000!!END! Page 507 2. CALPUFF.INP 57 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1154!X=680.19, 4860.66, 101.01, 0.000!!END! 1155!X=680.21, 4860.66, 101.19, 0.000!!END! 1156!X=680.23, 4860.66, 101.37, 0.000!!END! 1157!X=680.25, 4860.66, 101.44, 0.000!!END! 1158!X=680.27, 4860.66, 101.53, 0.000!!END! 1159!X=680.29, 4860.66, 101.62, 0.000!!END! 1160!X=680.31, 4860.66, 101.65, 0.000!!END! 1161!X=680.33, 4860.66, 101.66, 0.000!!END! 1162!X=680.35, 4860.66, 101.67, 0.000!!END! 1163!X=680.37, 4860.66, 101.64, 0.000!!END! 1164!X=680.39, 4860.66, 101.54, 0.000!!END! 1165!X=680.41, 4860.66, 101.43, 0.000!!END! 1166!X=680.43, 4860.66, 101.32, 0.000!!END! 1167!X=680.45, 4860.66, 101.58, 0.000!!END! 1168!X=680.47, 4860.66, 101.88, 0.000!!END! 1169!X=680.49, 4860.66, 102.17, 0.000!!END! 1170!X=680.51, 4860.66, 102.54, 0.000!!END! 1171!X=680.53, 4860.66, 102.96, 0.000!!END! 1172!X=680.55, 4860.66, 103.39, 0.000!!END! 1173!X=680.57, 4860.66, 103.82, 0.000!!END! 1174!X=680.59, 4860.66, 104.2, 0.000!!END! 1175!X=680.61, 4860.66, 104.58, 0.000!!END! 1176!X=680.63, 4860.66, 104.96, 0.000!!END! 1177!X=680.65, 4860.66, 104.08, 0.000!!END! 1178!X=680.67, 4860.66, 103.02, 0.000!!END! 1179!X=680.69, 4860.66, 101.96, 0.000!!END! 1180!X=680.71, 4860.66, 101.38, 0.000!!END! 1181!X=680.73, 4860.66, 101.24, 0.000!!END! 1182!X=680.75, 4860.66, 101.11, 0.000!!END! 1183!X=680.77, 4860.66, 101.02, 0.000!!END! 1184!X=680.79, 4860.66, 101.14, 0.000!!END! 1185!X=680.81, 4860.66, 101.26, 0.000!!END! 1186!X=680.83, 4860.66, 101.37, 0.000!!END! 1187!X=680.85, 4860.66, 101.17, 0.000!!END! 1188!X=680.87, 4860.66, 100.92, 0.000!!END! 1189!X=680.89, 4860.66, 100.66, 0.000!!END! 1190!X=680.91, 4860.66, 100.13, 0.000!!END! 1191!X=680.93, 4860.66, 99.31, 0.000!!END! 1192!X=680.95, 4860.66, 98.49, 0.000!!END! 1193!X=680.15, 4860.68, 100.99, 0.000!!END! 1194!X=680.17, 4860.68, 101.25, 0.000!!END! 1195!X=680.19, 4860.68, 101.36, 0.000!!END! 1196!X=680.21, 4860.68, 101.47, 0.000!!END! 1197!X=680.23, 4860.68, 101.59, 0.000!!END! 1198!X=680.25, 4860.68, 101.53, 0.000!!END! 1199!X=680.27, 4860.68, 101.49, 0.000!!END! 1200!X=680.29, 4860.68, 101.45, 0.000!!END! 1201!X=680.31, 4860.68, 101.44, 0.000!!END! 1202!X=680.33, 4860.68, 101.44, 0.000!!END! 1203!X=680.35, 4860.68, 101.45, 0.000!!END! 1204!X=680.37, 4860.68, 101.46, 0.000!!END! 1205!X=680.39, 4860.68, 101.49, 0.000!!END! 1206!X=680.41, 4860.68, 101.51, 0.000!!END! 1207!X=680.43, 4860.68, 101.53, 0.000!!END! 1208!X=680.45, 4860.68, 101.81, 0.000!!END! 1209!X=680.47, 4860.68, 102.1, 0.000!!END! 1210!X=680.49, 4860.68, 102.39, 0.000!!END! 1211!X=680.51, 4860.68, 102.68, 0.000!!END! 1212!X=680.53, 4860.68, 102.98, 0.000!!END! 1213!X=680.55, 4860.68, 103.28, 0.000!!END! 1214!X=680.57, 4860.68, 103.63, 0.000!!END! 1215!X=680.59, 4860.68, 104.08, 0.000!!END! 1216!X=680.61, 4860.68, 104.52, 0.000!!END! 1217!X=680.63, 4860.68, 104.96, 0.000!!END! 1218!X=680.65, 4860.68, 104.17, 0.000!!END! 1219!X=680.67, 4860.68, 103.24, 0.000!!END! Page 508 2. CALPUFF.INP 58 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1220!X=680.69, 4860.68, 102.31, 0.000!!END! 1221!X=680.71, 4860.68, 101.74, 0.000!!END! 1222!X=680.73, 4860.68, 101.47, 0.000!!END! 1223!X=680.75, 4860.68, 101.2, 0.000!!END! 1224!X=680.77, 4860.68, 101.05, 0.000!!END! 1225!X=680.79, 4860.68, 101.3, 0.000!!END! 1226!X=680.81, 4860.68, 101.55, 0.000!!END! 1227!X=680.83, 4860.68, 101.78, 0.000!!END! 1228!X=680.85, 4860.68, 101.65, 0.000!!END! 1229!X=680.87, 4860.68, 101.46, 0.000!!END! 1230!X=680.89, 4860.68, 101.26, 0.000!!END! 1231!X=680.91, 4860.68, 100.82, 0.000!!END! 1232!X=680.93, 4860.68, 100.13, 0.000!!END! 1233!X=680.95, 4860.68, 99.44, 0.000!!END! 1234!X=680.15, 4860.7, 101.35, 0.000!!END! 1235!X=680.17, 4860.7, 101.66, 0.000!!END! 1236!X=680.19, 4860.7, 101.7, 0.000!!END! 1237!X=680.21, 4860.7, 101.75, 0.000!!END! 1238!X=680.23, 4860.7, 101.79, 0.000!!END! 1239!X=680.25, 4860.7, 101.61, 0.000!!END! 1240!X=680.27, 4860.7, 101.44, 0.000!!END! 1241!X=680.29, 4860.7, 101.27, 0.000!!END! 1242!X=680.31, 4860.7, 101.22, 0.000!!END! 1243!X=680.33, 4860.7, 101.23, 0.000!!END! 1244!X=680.35, 4860.7, 101.23, 0.000!!END! 1245!X=680.37, 4860.7, 101.29, 0.000!!END! 1246!X=680.39, 4860.7, 101.45, 0.000!!END! 1247!X=680.41, 4860.7, 101.6, 0.000!!END! 1248!X=680.43, 4860.7, 101.74, 0.000!!END! 1249!X=680.45, 4860.7, 102.03, 0.000!!END! 1250!X=680.47, 4860.7, 102.32, 0.000!!END! 1251!X=680.49, 4860.7, 102.62, 0.000!!END! 1252!X=680.51, 4860.7, 102.83, 0.000!!END! 1253!X=680.53, 4860.7, 102.99, 0.000!!END! 1254!X=680.55, 4860.7, 103.17, 0.000!!END! 1255!X=680.57, 4860.7, 103.44, 0.000!!END! 1256!X=680.59, 4860.7, 103.96, 0.000!!END! 1257!X=680.61, 4860.7, 104.46, 0.000!!END! 1258!X=680.63, 4860.7, 104.97, 0.000!!END! 1259!X=680.65, 4860.7, 104.26, 0.000!!END! 1260!X=680.67, 4860.7, 103.47, 0.000!!END! 1261!X=680.69, 4860.7, 102.66, 0.000!!END! 1262!X=680.71, 4860.7, 102.09, 0.000!!END! 1263!X=680.73, 4860.7, 101.69, 0.000!!END! 1264!X=680.75, 4860.7, 101.3, 0.000!!END! 1265!X=680.77, 4860.7, 101.09, 0.000!!END! 1266!X=680.79, 4860.7, 101.47, 0.000!!END! 1267!X=680.81, 4860.7, 101.84, 0.000!!END! 1268!X=680.83, 4860.7, 102.21, 0.000!!END! 1269!X=680.85, 4860.7, 102.14, 0.000!!END! 1270!X=680.87, 4860.7, 102.01, 0.000!!END! 1271!X=680.89, 4860.7, 101.88, 0.000!!END! 1272!X=680.91, 4860.7, 101.52, 0.000!!END! 1273!X=680.93, 4860.7, 100.96, 0.000!!END! 1274!X=680.95, 4860.7, 100.39, 0.000!!END! 1275!X=680.15, 4860.72, 101.62, 0.000!!END! 1276!X=680.17, 4860.72, 101.96, 0.000!!END! 1277!X=680.19, 4860.72, 101.97, 0.000!!END! 1278!X=680.21, 4860.72, 101.98, 0.000!!END! 1279!X=680.23, 4860.72, 101.96, 0.000!!END! 1280!X=680.25, 4860.72, 101.68, 0.000!!END! 1281!X=680.27, 4860.72, 101.39, 0.000!!END! 1282!X=680.29, 4860.72, 101.09, 0.000!!END! 1283!X=680.31, 4860.72, 101.01, 0.000!!END! 1284!X=680.33, 4860.72, 101.01, 0.000!!END! 1285!X=680.35, 4860.72, 101.02, 0.000!!END! Page 509 2. CALPUFF.INP 59 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1286!X=680.37, 4860.72, 101.13, 0.000!!END! 1287!X=680.39, 4860.72, 101.41, 0.000!!END! 1288!X=680.41, 4860.72, 101.69, 0.000!!END! 1289!X=680.43, 4860.72, 101.96, 0.000!!END! 1290!X=680.45, 4860.72, 102.26, 0.000!!END! 1291!X=680.47, 4860.72, 102.55, 0.000!!END! 1292!X=680.49, 4860.72, 102.84, 0.000!!END! 1293!X=680.51, 4860.72, 102.96, 0.000!!END! 1294!X=680.53, 4860.72, 103, 0.000!!END! 1295!X=680.55, 4860.72, 103.05, 0.000!!END! 1296!X=680.57, 4860.72, 103.26, 0.000!!END! 1297!X=680.59, 4860.72, 103.84, 0.000!!END! 1298!X=680.61, 4860.72, 104.41, 0.000!!END! 1299!X=680.63, 4860.72, 104.98, 0.000!!END! 1300!X=680.65, 4860.72, 104.36, 0.000!!END! 1301!X=680.67, 4860.72, 103.7, 0.000!!END! 1302!X=680.69, 4860.72, 103.02, 0.000!!END! 1303!X=680.71, 4860.72, 102.43, 0.000!!END! 1304!X=680.73, 4860.72, 101.9, 0.000!!END! 1305!X=680.75, 4860.72, 101.38, 0.000!!END! 1306!X=680.77, 4860.72, 101.13, 0.000!!END! 1307!X=680.79, 4860.72, 101.64, 0.000!!END! 1308!X=680.81, 4860.72, 102.14, 0.000!!END! 1309!X=680.83, 4860.72, 102.64, 0.000!!END! 1310!X=680.85, 4860.72, 102.63, 0.000!!END! 1311!X=680.87, 4860.72, 102.56, 0.000!!END! 1312!X=680.89, 4860.72, 102.49, 0.000!!END! 1313!X=680.91, 4860.72, 102.22, 0.000!!END! 1314!X=680.93, 4860.72, 101.79, 0.000!!END! 1315!X=680.95, 4860.72, 101.36, 0.000!!END! 1316!X=680.15, 4860.74, 101.45, 0.000!!END! 1317!X=680.17, 4860.74, 101.75, 0.000!!END! 1318!X=680.19, 4860.74, 101.75, 0.000!!END! 1319!X=680.21, 4860.74, 101.76, 0.000!!END! 1320!X=680.23, 4860.74, 101.75, 0.000!!END! 1321!X=680.25, 4860.74, 101.6, 0.000!!END! 1322!X=680.27, 4860.74, 101.43, 0.000!!END! 1323!X=680.29, 4860.74, 101.26, 0.000!!END! 1324!X=680.31, 4860.74, 101.21, 0.000!!END! 1325!X=680.33, 4860.74, 101.2, 0.000!!END! 1326!X=680.35, 4860.74, 101.2, 0.000!!END! 1327!X=680.37, 4860.74, 101.31, 0.000!!END! 1328!X=680.39, 4860.74, 101.6, 0.000!!END! 1329!X=680.41, 4860.74, 101.89, 0.000!!END! 1330!X=680.43, 4860.74, 102.19, 0.000!!END! 1331!X=680.45, 4860.74, 102.48, 0.000!!END! 1332!X=680.47, 4860.74, 102.77, 0.000!!END! 1333!X=680.49, 4860.74, 103.06, 0.000!!END! 1334!X=680.51, 4860.74, 103.18, 0.000!!END! 1335!X=680.53, 4860.74, 103.22, 0.000!!END! 1336!X=680.55, 4860.74, 103.25, 0.000!!END! 1337!X=680.57, 4860.74, 103.46, 0.000!!END! 1338!X=680.59, 4860.74, 104, 0.000!!END! 1339!X=680.61, 4860.74, 104.56, 0.000!!END! 1340!X=680.63, 4860.74, 105.11, 0.000!!END! 1341!X=680.65, 4860.74, 104.49, 0.000!!END! 1342!X=680.67, 4860.74, 103.85, 0.000!!END! 1343!X=680.69, 4860.74, 103.23, 0.000!!END! 1344!X=680.71, 4860.74, 102.65, 0.000!!END! 1345!X=680.73, 4860.74, 102.11, 0.000!!END! 1346!X=680.75, 4860.74, 101.55, 0.000!!END! 1347!X=680.77, 4860.74, 101.3, 0.000!!END! 1348!X=680.79, 4860.74, 101.8, 0.000!!END! 1349!X=680.81, 4860.74, 102.32, 0.000!!END! 1350!X=680.83, 4860.74, 102.85, 0.000!!END! 1351!X=680.85, 4860.74, 102.91, 0.000!!END! Page 510 2. CALPUFF.INP 60 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1352!X=680.87, 4860.74, 102.94, 0.000!!END! 1353!X=680.89, 4860.74, 102.96, 0.000!!END! 1354!X=680.91, 4860.74, 102.81, 0.000!!END! 1355!X=680.93, 4860.74, 102.54, 0.000!!END! 1356!X=680.95, 4860.74, 102.26, 0.000!!END! 1357!X=680.15, 4860.76, 101.28, 0.000!!END! 1358!X=680.17, 4860.76, 101.53, 0.000!!END! 1359!X=680.19, 4860.76, 101.54, 0.000!!END! 1360!X=680.21, 4860.76, 101.54, 0.000!!END! 1361!X=680.23, 4860.76, 101.55, 0.000!!END! 1362!X=680.25, 4860.76, 101.52, 0.000!!END! 1363!X=680.27, 4860.76, 101.48, 0.000!!END! 1364!X=680.29, 4860.76, 101.44, 0.000!!END! 1365!X=680.31, 4860.76, 101.43, 0.000!!END! 1366!X=680.33, 4860.76, 101.42, 0.000!!END! 1367!X=680.35, 4860.76, 101.41, 0.000!!END! 1368!X=680.37, 4860.76, 101.53, 0.000!!END! 1369!X=680.39, 4860.76, 101.83, 0.000!!END! 1370!X=680.41, 4860.76, 102.12, 0.000!!END! 1371!X=680.43, 4860.76, 102.41, 0.000!!END! 1372!X=680.45, 4860.76, 102.7, 0.000!!END! 1373!X=680.47, 4860.76, 103, 0.000!!END! 1374!X=680.49, 4860.76, 103.29, 0.000!!END! 1375!X=680.51, 4860.76, 103.45, 0.000!!END! 1376!X=680.53, 4860.76, 103.55, 0.000!!END! 1377!X=680.55, 4860.76, 103.64, 0.000!!END! 1378!X=680.57, 4860.76, 103.88, 0.000!!END! 1379!X=680.59, 4860.76, 104.36, 0.000!!END! 1380!X=680.61, 4860.76, 104.85, 0.000!!END! 1381!X=680.63, 4860.76, 105.32, 0.000!!END! 1382!X=680.65, 4860.76, 104.62, 0.000!!END! 1383!X=680.67, 4860.76, 103.92, 0.000!!END! 1384!X=680.69, 4860.76, 103.23, 0.000!!END! 1385!X=680.71, 4860.76, 102.72, 0.000!!END! 1386!X=680.73, 4860.76, 102.31, 0.000!!END! 1387!X=680.75, 4860.76, 101.88, 0.000!!END! 1388!X=680.77, 4860.76, 101.66, 0.000!!END! 1389!X=680.79, 4860.76, 101.91, 0.000!!END! 1390!X=680.81, 4860.76, 102.17, 0.000!!END! 1391!X=680.83, 4860.76, 102.45, 0.000!!END! 1392!X=680.85, 4860.76, 102.54, 0.000!!END! 1393!X=680.87, 4860.76, 102.63, 0.000!!END! 1394!X=680.89, 4860.76, 102.72, 0.000!!END! 1395!X=680.91, 4860.76, 102.7, 0.000!!END! 1396!X=680.93, 4860.76, 102.63, 0.000!!END! 1397!X=680.95, 4860.76, 102.54, 0.000!!END! 1398!X=679.85, 4859.66, 74.37, 0.000!!END! 1399!X=679.9, 4859.66, 74.34, 0.000!!END! 1400!X=679.95, 4859.66, 74.58, 0.000!!END! 1401!X=680, 4859.66, 75.02, 0.000!!END! 1402!X=680.05, 4859.66, 75.44, 0.000!!END! 1403!X=680.1, 4859.66, 75.05, 0.000!!END! 1404!X=680.15, 4859.66, 74.79, 0.000!!END! 1405!X=680.2, 4859.66, 74.91, 0.000!!END! 1406!X=680.25, 4859.66, 75.71, 0.000!!END! 1407!X=680.3, 4859.66, 77.17, 0.000!!END! 1408!X=680.35, 4859.66, 78.05, 0.000!!END! 1409!X=680.4, 4859.66, 78.3, 0.000!!END! 1410!X=680.45, 4859.66, 78.53, 0.000!!END! 1411!X=680.5, 4859.66, 79.38, 0.000!!END! 1412!X=680.55, 4859.66, 80.22, 0.000!!END! 1413!X=680.6, 4859.66, 80.44, 0.000!!END! 1414!X=680.65, 4859.66, 77.96, 0.000!!END! 1415!X=680.7, 4859.66, 76.83, 0.000!!END! 1416!X=680.75, 4859.66, 76.37, 0.000!!END! 1417!X=680.8, 4859.66, 76.25, 0.000!!END! Page 511 2. CALPUFF.INP 61 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1418!X=680.85, 4859.66, 76.13, 0.000!!END! 1419!X=680.9, 4859.66, 76.01, 0.000!!END! 1420!X=680.95, 4859.66, 75.78, 0.000!!END! 1421!X=681, 4859.66, 75.24, 0.000!!END! 1422!X=681.05, 4859.66, 73.4, 0.000!!END! 1423!X=681.1, 4859.66, 73, 0.000!!END! 1424!X=681.15, 4859.66, 73, 0.000!!END! 1425!X=681.2, 4859.66, 73, 0.000!!END! 1426!X=681.25, 4859.66, 73, 0.000!!END! 1427!X=679.85, 4859.71, 75.24, 0.000!!END! 1428!X=679.9, 4859.71, 75.07, 0.000!!END! 1429!X=679.95, 4859.71, 75.68, 0.000!!END! 1430!X=680, 4859.71, 76.78, 0.000!!END! 1431!X=680.05, 4859.71, 77.73, 0.000!!END! 1432!X=680.1, 4859.71, 76.99, 0.000!!END! 1433!X=680.15, 4859.71, 76.6, 0.000!!END! 1434!X=680.2, 4859.71, 76.97, 0.000!!END! 1435!X=680.25, 4859.71, 78.55, 0.000!!END! 1436!X=680.3, 4859.71, 81.27, 0.000!!END! 1437!X=680.35, 4859.71, 82.92, 0.000!!END! 1438!X=680.4, 4859.71, 83.53, 0.000!!END! 1439!X=680.45, 4859.71, 84.19, 0.000!!END! 1440!X=680.5, 4859.71, 84.2, 0.000!!END! 1441!X=680.55, 4859.71, 84.11, 0.000!!END! 1442!X=680.6, 4859.71, 83.89, 0.000!!END! 1443!X=680.65, 4859.71, 83.03, 0.000!!END! 1444!X=680.7, 4859.71, 81.54, 0.000!!END! 1445!X=680.75, 4859.71, 80.69, 0.000!!END! 1446!X=680.8, 4859.71, 80.57, 0.000!!END! 1447!X=680.85, 4859.71, 80.45, 0.000!!END! 1448!X=680.9, 4859.71, 80.33, 0.000!!END! 1449!X=680.95, 4859.71, 79.9, 0.000!!END! 1450!X=681, 4859.71, 78.59, 0.000!!END! 1451!X=681.05, 4859.71, 73.94, 0.000!!END! 1452!X=681.1, 4859.71, 73, 0.000!!END! 1453!X=681.15, 4859.71, 73, 0.000!!END! 1454!X=681.2, 4859.71, 73, 0.000!!END! 1455!X=681.25, 4859.71, 73, 0.000!!END! 1456!X=679.85, 4859.76, 75.8, 0.000!!END! 1457!X=679.9, 4859.76, 75.22, 0.000!!END! 1458!X=679.95, 4859.76, 76.45, 0.000!!END! 1459!X=680, 4859.76, 78.64, 0.000!!END! 1460!X=680.05, 4859.76, 80.39, 0.000!!END! 1461!X=680.1, 4859.76, 79.29, 0.000!!END! 1462!X=680.15, 4859.76, 79, 0.000!!END! 1463!X=680.2, 4859.76, 79.92, 0.000!!END! 1464!X=680.25, 4859.76, 82.3, 0.000!!END! 1465!X=680.3, 4859.76, 85.13, 0.000!!END! 1466!X=680.35, 4859.76, 86.49, 0.000!!END! 1467!X=680.4, 4859.76, 86.79, 0.000!!END! 1468!X=680.45, 4859.76, 87.44, 0.000!!END! 1469!X=680.5, 4859.76, 87.44, 0.000!!END! 1470!X=680.55, 4859.76, 87.13, 0.000!!END! 1471!X=680.6, 4859.76, 86.65, 0.000!!END! 1472!X=680.65, 4859.76, 86.23, 0.000!!END! 1473!X=680.7, 4859.76, 86.13, 0.000!!END! 1474!X=680.75, 4859.76, 86.59, 0.000!!END! 1475!X=680.8, 4859.76, 87.45, 0.000!!END! 1476!X=680.85, 4859.76, 87.96, 0.000!!END! 1477!X=680.9, 4859.76, 87.85, 0.000!!END! 1478!X=680.95, 4859.76, 87.25, 0.000!!END! 1479!X=681, 4859.76, 85.97, 0.000!!END! 1480!X=681.05, 4859.76, 82.97, 0.000!!END! 1481!X=681.1, 4859.76, 82.14, 0.000!!END! 1482!X=681.15, 4859.76, 80.7, 0.000!!END! 1483!X=681.2, 4859.76, 78.17, 0.000!!END! Page 512 2. CALPUFF.INP 62 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1484!X=681.25, 4859.76, 75.59, 0.000!!END! 1485!X=679.85, 4859.81, 76.33, 0.000!!END! 1486!X=679.9, 4859.81, 75.98, 0.000!!END! 1487!X=679.95, 4859.81, 77.45, 0.000!!END! 1488!X=680, 4859.81, 79.8, 0.000!!END! 1489!X=680.05, 4859.81, 81.66, 0.000!!END! 1490!X=680.1, 4859.81, 80.84, 0.000!!END! 1491!X=680.15, 4859.81, 81.09, 0.000!!END! 1492!X=680.2, 4859.81, 82.62, 0.000!!END! 1493!X=680.25, 4859.81, 85.54, 0.000!!END! 1494!X=680.3, 4859.81, 88.11, 0.000!!END! 1495!X=680.35, 4859.81, 89.23, 0.000!!END! 1496!X=680.4, 4859.81, 89.47, 0.000!!END! 1497!X=680.45, 4859.81, 90.19, 0.000!!END! 1498!X=680.5, 4859.81, 90.3, 0.000!!END! 1499!X=680.55, 4859.81, 89.87, 0.000!!END! 1500!X=680.6, 4859.81, 89.27, 0.000!!END! 1501!X=680.65, 4859.81, 89.27, 0.000!!END! 1502!X=680.7, 4859.81, 90.51, 0.000!!END! 1503!X=680.75, 4859.81, 92.34, 0.000!!END! 1504!X=680.8, 4859.81, 94.37, 0.000!!END! 1505!X=680.85, 4859.81, 95.84, 0.000!!END! 1506!X=680.9, 4859.81, 95.94, 0.000!!END! 1507!X=680.95, 4859.81, 95.33, 0.000!!END! 1508!X=681, 4859.81, 94.61, 0.000!!END! 1509!X=681.05, 4859.81, 94.83, 0.000!!END! 1510!X=681.1, 4859.81, 94.56, 0.000!!END! 1511!X=681.15, 4859.81, 91.42, 0.000!!END! 1512!X=681.2, 4859.81, 85.59, 0.000!!END! 1513!X=681.25, 4859.81, 79.39, 0.000!!END! 1514!X=679.85, 4859.86, 76.84, 0.000!!END! 1515!X=679.9, 4859.86, 77.32, 0.000!!END! 1516!X=679.95, 4859.86, 78.61, 0.000!!END! 1517!X=680, 4859.86, 80.13, 0.000!!END! 1518!X=680.05, 4859.86, 81.19, 0.000!!END! 1519!X=680.1, 4859.86, 81.46, 0.000!!END! 1520!X=680.15, 4859.86, 82.71, 0.000!!END! 1521!X=680.2, 4859.86, 84.86, 0.000!!END! 1522!X=680.25, 4859.86, 87.78, 0.000!!END! 1523!X=680.3, 4859.86, 89.18, 0.000!!END! 1524!X=680.35, 4859.86, 90.02, 0.000!!END! 1525!X=680.4, 4859.86, 90.57, 0.000!!END! 1526!X=680.45, 4859.86, 91.29, 0.000!!END! 1527!X=680.5, 4859.86, 91.76, 0.000!!END! 1528!X=680.55, 4859.86, 91.47, 0.000!!END! 1529!X=680.6, 4859.86, 90.99, 0.000!!END! 1530!X=680.65, 4859.86, 91.4, 0.000!!END! 1531!X=680.7, 4859.86, 92.34, 0.000!!END! 1532!X=680.75, 4859.86, 93.78, 0.000!!END! 1533!X=680.8, 4859.86, 95.58, 0.000!!END! 1534!X=680.85, 4859.86, 97.46, 0.000!!END! 1535!X=680.9, 4859.86, 98.68, 0.000!!END! 1536!X=680.95, 4859.86, 99.36, 0.000!!END! 1537!X=681, 4859.86, 99.64, 0.000!!END! 1538!X=681.05, 4859.86, 99.89, 0.000!!END! 1539!X=681.1, 4859.86, 98.26, 0.000!!END! 1540!X=681.15, 4859.86, 94.56, 0.000!!END! 1541!X=681.2, 4859.86, 89.45, 0.000!!END! 1542!X=681.25, 4859.86, 85.23, 0.000!!END! 1543!X=679.85, 4859.91, 78.16, 0.000!!END! 1544!X=679.9, 4859.91, 78.31, 0.000!!END! 1545!X=679.95, 4859.91, 79.38, 0.000!!END! 1546!X=680, 4859.91, 80.6, 0.000!!END! 1547!X=680.05, 4859.91, 81.33, 0.000!!END! 1548!X=680.1, 4859.91, 82.53, 0.000!!END! 1549!X=680.15, 4859.91, 84.23, 0.000!!END! Page 513 2. CALPUFF.INP 63 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1550!X=680.2, 4859.91, 86.53, 0.000!!END! 1551!X=680.25, 4859.91, 89.49, 0.000!!END! 1552!X=680.3, 4859.91, 90.42, 0.000!!END! 1553!X=680.35, 4859.91, 91.08, 0.000!!END! 1554!X=680.4, 4859.91, 91.62, 0.000!!END! 1555!X=680.45, 4859.91, 92.19, 0.000!!END! 1556!X=680.5, 4859.91, 92.77, 0.000!!END! 1557!X=680.55, 4859.91, 92.62, 0.000!!END! 1558!X=680.6, 4859.91, 92.41, 0.000!!END! 1559!X=680.65, 4859.91, 93.25, 0.000!!END! 1560!X=680.7, 4859.91, 94.07, 0.000!!END! 1561!X=680.75, 4859.91, 95.1, 0.000!!END! 1562!X=680.8, 4859.91, 96.63, 0.000!!END! 1563!X=680.85, 4859.91, 99, 0.000!!END! 1564!X=680.9, 4859.91, 101.01, 0.000!!END! 1565!X=680.95, 4859.91, 102.78, 0.000!!END! 1566!X=681, 4859.91, 103.96, 0.000!!END! 1567!X=681.05, 4859.91, 104, 0.000!!END! 1568!X=681.1, 4859.91, 100.62, 0.000!!END! 1569!X=681.15, 4859.91, 96.48, 0.000!!END! 1570!X=681.2, 4859.91, 92.75, 0.000!!END! 1571!X=681.25, 4859.91, 91.75, 0.000!!END! 1572!X=679.85, 4859.96, 79.74, 0.000!!END! 1573!X=679.9, 4859.96, 79.08, 0.000!!END! 1574!X=679.95, 4859.96, 79.96, 0.000!!END! 1575!X=680, 4859.96, 81.16, 0.000!!END! 1576!X=680.05, 4859.96, 81.93, 0.000!!END! 1577!X=680.1, 4859.96, 83.93, 0.000!!END! 1578!X=681, 4859.96, 103.53, 0.000!!END! 1579!X=681.05, 4859.96, 103.97, 0.000!!END! 1580!X=681.1, 4859.96, 100.14, 0.000!!END! 1581!X=681.15, 4859.96, 97.01, 0.000!!END! 1582!X=681.2, 4859.96, 94.92, 0.000!!END! 1583!X=681.25, 4859.96, 94.12, 0.000!!END! 1584!X=679.85, 4860.01, 80.46, 0.000!!END! 1585!X=679.9, 4860.01, 80.37, 0.000!!END! 1586!X=679.95, 4860.01, 80.93, 0.000!!END! 1587!X=680, 4860.01, 81.72, 0.000!!END! 1588!X=680.05, 4860.01, 82.54, 0.000!!END! 1589!X=680.1, 4860.01, 84.76, 0.000!!END! 1590!X=681, 4860.01, 102.66, 0.000!!END! 1591!X=681.05, 4860.01, 103.31, 0.000!!END! 1592!X=681.1, 4860.01, 99.55, 0.000!!END! 1593!X=681.15, 4860.01, 97.54, 0.000!!END! 1594!X=681.2, 4860.01, 96.81, 0.000!!END! 1595!X=681.25, 4860.01, 96.1, 0.000!!END! 1596!X=679.85, 4860.06, 81.08, 0.000!!END! 1597!X=679.9, 4860.06, 81.8, 0.000!!END! 1598!X=679.95, 4860.06, 81.95, 0.000!!END! 1599!X=680, 4860.06, 82.28, 0.000!!END! 1600!X=680.05, 4860.06, 83.14, 0.000!!END! 1601!X=680.1, 4860.06, 85.36, 0.000!!END! 1602!X=681, 4860.06, 100.26, 0.000!!END! 1603!X=681.05, 4860.06, 100.1, 0.000!!END! 1604!X=681.1, 4860.06, 98.58, 0.000!!END! 1605!X=681.15, 4860.06, 97.52, 0.000!!END! 1606!X=681.2, 4860.06, 96.91, 0.000!!END! 1607!X=681.25, 4860.06, 96.6, 0.000!!END! 1608!X=679.85, 4860.11, 81.1, 0.000!!END! 1609!X=679.9, 4860.11, 81.85, 0.000!!END! 1610!X=679.95, 4860.11, 82.3, 0.000!!END! 1611!X=680, 4860.11, 83.01, 0.000!!END! 1612!X=680.05, 4860.11, 84.27, 0.000!!END! 1613!X=680.1, 4860.11, 86.83, 0.000!!END! 1614!X=681, 4860.11, 98.79, 0.000!!END! 1615!X=681.05, 4860.11, 98.19, 0.000!!END! Page 514 2. CALPUFF.INP 64 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1616!X=681.1, 4860.11, 97.91, 0.000!!END! 1617!X=681.15, 4860.11, 97.42, 0.000!!END! 1618!X=681.2, 4860.11, 96.96, 0.000!!END! 1619!X=681.25, 4860.11, 96.87, 0.000!!END! 1620!X=679.85, 4860.16, 81.36, 0.000!!END! 1621!X=679.9, 4860.16, 82.01, 0.000!!END! 1622!X=679.95, 4860.16, 82.79, 0.000!!END! 1623!X=680, 4860.16, 83.87, 0.000!!END! 1624!X=680.05, 4860.16, 85.52, 0.000!!END! 1625!X=680.1, 4860.16, 88.43, 0.000!!END! 1626!X=681, 4860.16, 98.93, 0.000!!END! 1627!X=681.05, 4860.16, 98.69, 0.000!!END! 1628!X=681.1, 4860.16, 97.6, 0.000!!END! 1629!X=681.15, 4860.16, 97.14, 0.000!!END! 1630!X=681.2, 4860.16, 96.82, 0.000!!END! 1631!X=681.25, 4860.16, 96.33, 0.000!!END! 1632!X=679.85, 4860.21, 82.92, 0.000!!END! 1633!X=679.9, 4860.21, 83.17, 0.000!!END! 1634!X=679.95, 4860.21, 84.57, 0.000!!END! 1635!X=680, 4860.21, 86.07, 0.000!!END! 1636!X=680.05, 4860.21, 87.62, 0.000!!END! 1637!X=680.1, 4860.21, 89.73, 0.000!!END! 1638!X=681, 4860.21, 99.4, 0.000!!END! 1639!X=681.05, 4860.21, 98.89, 0.000!!END! 1640!X=681.1, 4860.21, 97.2, 0.000!!END! 1641!X=681.15, 4860.21, 97.02, 0.000!!END! 1642!X=681.2, 4860.21, 97.07, 0.000!!END! 1643!X=681.25, 4860.21, 96.64, 0.000!!END! 1644!X=679.85, 4860.26, 84.95, 0.000!!END! 1645!X=679.9, 4860.26, 84.75, 0.000!!END! 1646!X=679.95, 4860.26, 86.45, 0.000!!END! 1647!X=680, 4860.26, 88.11, 0.000!!END! 1648!X=680.05, 4860.26, 89.49, 0.000!!END! 1649!X=680.1, 4860.26, 90.88, 0.000!!END! 1650!X=681, 4860.26, 100.12, 0.000!!END! 1651!X=681.05, 4860.26, 98.8, 0.000!!END! 1652!X=681.1, 4860.26, 96.72, 0.000!!END! 1653!X=681.15, 4860.26, 97.1, 0.000!!END! 1654!X=681.2, 4860.26, 97.93, 0.000!!END! 1655!X=681.25, 4860.26, 98.3, 0.000!!END! 1656!X=679.85, 4860.31, 88.09, 0.000!!END! 1657!X=679.9, 4860.31, 87.49, 0.000!!END! 1658!X=679.95, 4860.31, 88.48, 0.000!!END! 1659!X=680, 4860.31, 89.54, 0.000!!END! 1660!X=680.05, 4860.31, 90.51, 0.000!!END! 1661!X=680.1, 4860.31, 91.51, 0.000!!END! 1662!X=681, 4860.31, 100.56, 0.000!!END! 1663!X=681.05, 4860.31, 99.56, 0.000!!END! 1664!X=681.1, 4860.31, 98.28, 0.000!!END! 1665!X=681.15, 4860.31, 97.97, 0.000!!END! 1666!X=681.2, 4860.31, 98.33, 0.000!!END! 1667!X=681.25, 4860.31, 99.12, 0.000!!END! 1668!X=679.85, 4860.36, 90.14, 0.000!!END! 1669!X=679.9, 4860.36, 89.71, 0.000!!END! 1670!X=679.95, 4860.36, 90.33, 0.000!!END! 1671!X=680, 4860.36, 90.86, 0.000!!END! 1672!X=680.05, 4860.36, 91.37, 0.000!!END! 1673!X=680.1, 4860.36, 92.1, 0.000!!END! 1674!X=681, 4860.36, 100.93, 0.000!!END! 1675!X=681.05, 4860.36, 100.84, 0.000!!END! 1676!X=681.1, 4860.36, 101.18, 0.000!!END! 1677!X=681.15, 4860.36, 99.25, 0.000!!END! 1678!X=681.2, 4860.36, 98.35, 0.000!!END! 1679!X=681.25, 4860.36, 99.26, 0.000!!END! 1680!X=679.85, 4860.41, 90.91, 0.000!!END! 1681!X=679.9, 4860.41, 91.28, 0.000!!END! Page 515 2. CALPUFF.INP 65 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1682!X=679.95, 4860.41, 91.97, 0.000!!END! 1683!X=680, 4860.41, 91.99, 0.000!!END! 1684!X=680.05, 4860.41, 91.93, 0.000!!END! 1685!X=680.1, 4860.41, 92.66, 0.000!!END! 1686!X=681, 4860.41, 100.56, 0.000!!END! 1687!X=681.05, 4860.41, 100.76, 0.000!!END! 1688!X=681.1, 4860.41, 101.83, 0.000!!END! 1689!X=681.15, 4860.41, 100.75, 0.000!!END! 1690!X=681.2, 4860.41, 99.87, 0.000!!END! 1691!X=681.25, 4860.41, 99.75, 0.000!!END! 1692!X=679.85, 4860.46, 91.96, 0.000!!END! 1693!X=679.9, 4860.46, 92.91, 0.000!!END! 1694!X=679.95, 4860.46, 93.83, 0.000!!END! 1695!X=680, 4860.46, 93.63, 0.000!!END! 1696!X=680.05, 4860.46, 93.28, 0.000!!END! 1697!X=680.1, 4860.46, 93.97, 0.000!!END! 1698!X=681, 4860.46, 100.02, 0.000!!END! 1699!X=681.05, 4860.46, 100.33, 0.000!!END! 1700!X=681.1, 4860.46, 101.8, 0.000!!END! 1701!X=681.15, 4860.46, 102.45, 0.000!!END! 1702!X=681.2, 4860.46, 101.93, 0.000!!END! 1703!X=681.25, 4860.46, 100.24, 0.000!!END! 1704!X=679.85, 4860.51, 93.21, 0.000!!END! 1705!X=679.9, 4860.51, 94.56, 0.000!!END! 1706!X=679.95, 4860.51, 95.88, 0.000!!END! 1707!X=680, 4860.51, 95.77, 0.000!!END! 1708!X=680.05, 4860.51, 95.46, 0.000!!END! 1709!X=680.1, 4860.51, 96.15, 0.000!!END! 1710!X=681, 4860.51, 100.52, 0.000!!END! 1711!X=681.05, 4860.51, 100.77, 0.000!!END! 1712!X=681.1, 4860.51, 101.88, 0.000!!END! 1713!X=681.15, 4860.51, 103.3, 0.000!!END! 1714!X=681.2, 4860.51, 103.3, 0.000!!END! 1715!X=681.25, 4860.51, 101.57, 0.000!!END! 1716!X=679.85, 4860.56, 93.63, 0.000!!END! 1717!X=679.9, 4860.56, 94.3, 0.000!!END! 1718!X=679.95, 4860.56, 96.09, 0.000!!END! 1719!X=680, 4860.56, 96.68, 0.000!!END! 1720!X=680.05, 4860.56, 97.04, 0.000!!END! 1721!X=680.1, 4860.56, 97.99, 0.000!!END! 1722!X=681, 4860.56, 100.89, 0.000!!END! 1723!X=681.05, 4860.56, 101.21, 0.000!!END! 1724!X=681.1, 4860.56, 101.88, 0.000!!END! 1725!X=681.15, 4860.56, 104.03, 0.000!!END! 1726!X=681.2, 4860.56, 104.57, 0.000!!END! 1727!X=681.25, 4860.56, 103.08, 0.000!!END! 1728!X=679.85, 4860.61, 93.69, 0.000!!END! 1729!X=679.9, 4860.61, 93.29, 0.000!!END! 1730!X=679.95, 4860.61, 95.49, 0.000!!END! 1731!X=680, 4860.61, 97.02, 0.000!!END! 1732!X=680.05, 4860.61, 98.31, 0.000!!END! 1733!X=680.1, 4860.61, 99.61, 0.000!!END! 1734!X=681, 4860.61, 99.99, 0.000!!END! 1735!X=681.05, 4860.61, 101.43, 0.000!!END! 1736!X=681.1, 4860.61, 100.88, 0.000!!END! 1737!X=681.15, 4860.61, 103.39, 0.000!!END! 1738!X=681.2, 4860.61, 104.5, 0.000!!END! 1739!X=681.25, 4860.61, 103.96, 0.000!!END! 1740!X=679.85, 4860.66, 95.76, 0.000!!END! 1741!X=679.9, 4860.66, 95.51, 0.000!!END! 1742!X=679.95, 4860.66, 97.34, 0.000!!END! 1743!X=680, 4860.66, 97.89, 0.000!!END! 1744!X=680.05, 4860.66, 98.62, 0.000!!END! 1745!X=680.1, 4860.66, 100.04, 0.000!!END! 1746!X=681, 4860.66, 99.94, 0.000!!END! 1747!X=681.05, 4860.66, 101.7, 0.000!!END! Page 516 2. CALPUFF.INP 66 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1748!X=681.1, 4860.66, 99.93, 0.000!!END! 1749!X=681.15, 4860.66, 102.8, 0.000!!END! 1750!X=681.2, 4860.66, 104.35, 0.000!!END! 1751!X=681.25, 4860.66, 104.64, 0.000!!END! 1752!X=679.85, 4860.71, 97.99, 0.000!!END! 1753!X=679.9, 4860.71, 98.17, 0.000!!END! 1754!X=679.95, 4860.71, 99.64, 0.000!!END! 1755!X=680, 4860.71, 98.8, 0.000!!END! 1756!X=680.05, 4860.71, 98.66, 0.000!!END! 1757!X=680.1, 4860.71, 100.14, 0.000!!END! 1758!X=681, 4860.71, 101.91, 0.000!!END! 1759!X=681.05, 4860.71, 102.32, 0.000!!END! 1760!X=681.1, 4860.71, 99.35, 0.000!!END! 1761!X=681.15, 4860.71, 102.35, 0.000!!END! 1762!X=681.2, 4860.71, 103.56, 0.000!!END! 1763!X=681.25, 4860.71, 103.54, 0.000!!END! 1764!X=679.85, 4860.76, 97.8, 0.000!!END! 1765!X=679.9, 4860.76, 97.55, 0.000!!END! 1766!X=679.95, 4860.76, 98.27, 0.000!!END! 1767!X=680, 4860.76, 97.87, 0.000!!END! 1768!X=680.05, 4860.76, 98.37, 0.000!!END! 1769!X=680.1, 4860.76, 100.14, 0.000!!END! 1770!X=681, 4860.76, 103.15, 0.000!!END! 1771!X=681.05, 4860.76, 102.59, 0.000!!END! 1772!X=681.1, 4860.76, 99.46, 0.000!!END! 1773!X=681.15, 4860.76, 102.01, 0.000!!END! 1774!X=681.2, 4860.76, 102.92, 0.000!!END! 1775!X=681.25, 4860.76, 102.82, 0.000!!END! 1776!X=679.85, 4860.81, 97.86, 0.000!!END! 1777!X=679.9, 4860.81, 97.26, 0.000!!END! 1778!X=679.95, 4860.81, 97.21, 0.000!!END! 1779!X=680, 4860.81, 97.2, 0.000!!END! 1780!X=680.05, 4860.81, 98.26, 0.000!!END! 1781!X=680.1, 4860.81, 100.19, 0.000!!END! 1782!X=680.15, 4860.81, 100.87, 0.000!!END! 1783!X=680.2, 4860.81, 101, 0.000!!END! 1784!X=680.25, 4860.81, 101.36, 0.000!!END! 1785!X=680.3, 4860.81, 101.97, 0.000!!END! 1786!X=680.35, 4860.81, 101.95, 0.000!!END! 1787!X=680.4, 4860.81, 102.53, 0.000!!END! 1788!X=680.45, 4860.81, 103.26, 0.000!!END! 1789!X=680.5, 4860.81, 103.99, 0.000!!END! 1790!X=680.55, 4860.81, 104.64, 0.000!!END! 1791!X=680.6, 4860.81, 105.41, 0.000!!END! 1792!X=680.65, 4860.81, 104.94, 0.000!!END! 1793!X=680.7, 4860.81, 102.98, 0.000!!END! 1794!X=680.75, 4860.81, 102.73, 0.000!!END! 1795!X=680.8, 4860.81, 101.92, 0.000!!END! 1796!X=680.85, 4860.81, 101.64, 0.000!!END! 1797!X=680.9, 4860.81, 102.28, 0.000!!END! 1798!X=680.95, 4860.81, 103.29, 0.000!!END! 1799!X=681, 4860.81, 103.37, 0.000!!END! 1800!X=681.05, 4860.81, 102.44, 0.000!!END! 1801!X=681.1, 4860.81, 100.54, 0.000!!END! 1802!X=681.15, 4860.81, 101.89, 0.000!!END! 1803!X=681.2, 4860.81, 102.67, 0.000!!END! 1804!X=681.25, 4860.81, 103.11, 0.000!!END! 1805!X=679.85, 4860.86, 99.13, 0.000!!END! 1806!X=679.9, 4860.86, 98.88, 0.000!!END! 1807!X=679.95, 4860.86, 98.83, 0.000!!END! 1808!X=680, 4860.86, 99.17, 0.000!!END! 1809!X=680.05, 4860.86, 100.27, 0.000!!END! 1810!X=680.1, 4860.86, 101.61, 0.000!!END! 1811!X=680.15, 4860.86, 101.08, 0.000!!END! 1812!X=680.2, 4860.86, 101, 0.000!!END! 1813!X=680.25, 4860.86, 101.37, 0.000!!END! Page 517 2. CALPUFF.INP 67 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1814!X=680.3, 4860.86, 101.94, 0.000!!END! 1815!X=680.35, 4860.86, 101.57, 0.000!!END! 1816!X=680.4, 4860.86, 102.13, 0.000!!END! 1817!X=680.45, 4860.86, 103.06, 0.000!!END! 1818!X=680.5, 4860.86, 104.11, 0.000!!END! 1819!X=680.55, 4860.86, 104.85, 0.000!!END! 1820!X=680.6, 4860.86, 105.35, 0.000!!END! 1821!X=680.65, 4860.86, 104.98, 0.000!!END! 1822!X=680.7, 4860.86, 103.64, 0.000!!END! 1823!X=680.75, 4860.86, 102.49, 0.000!!END! 1824!X=680.8, 4860.86, 101.53, 0.000!!END! 1825!X=680.85, 4860.86, 101.67, 0.000!!END! 1826!X=680.9, 4860.86, 103.05, 0.000!!END! 1827!X=680.95, 4860.86, 103.55, 0.000!!END! 1828!X=681, 4860.86, 102.96, 0.000!!END! 1829!X=681.05, 4860.86, 101.79, 0.000!!END! 1830!X=681.1, 4860.86, 100.56, 0.000!!END! 1831!X=681.15, 4860.86, 101.92, 0.000!!END! 1832!X=681.2, 4860.86, 102.93, 0.000!!END! 1833!X=681.25, 4860.86, 103.69, 0.000!!END! 1834!X=679.85, 4860.91, 100.13, 0.000!!END! 1835!X=679.9, 4860.91, 99.89, 0.000!!END! 1836!X=679.95, 4860.91, 100.13, 0.000!!END! 1837!X=680, 4860.91, 100.89, 0.000!!END! 1838!X=680.05, 4860.91, 102.01, 0.000!!END! 1839!X=680.1, 4860.91, 102.83, 0.000!!END! 1840!X=680.15, 4860.91, 101.45, 0.000!!END! 1841!X=680.2, 4860.91, 101.18, 0.000!!END! 1842!X=680.25, 4860.91, 101.54, 0.000!!END! 1843!X=680.3, 4860.91, 102.01, 0.000!!END! 1844!X=680.35, 4860.91, 101.24, 0.000!!END! 1845!X=680.4, 4860.91, 101.68, 0.000!!END! 1846!X=680.45, 4860.91, 102.76, 0.000!!END! 1847!X=680.5, 4860.91, 104.13, 0.000!!END! 1848!X=680.55, 4860.91, 104.87, 0.000!!END! 1849!X=680.6, 4860.91, 105.02, 0.000!!END! 1850!X=680.65, 4860.91, 104.99, 0.000!!END! 1851!X=680.7, 4860.91, 104.45, 0.000!!END! 1852!X=680.75, 4860.91, 101.69, 0.000!!END! 1853!X=680.8, 4860.91, 101.08, 0.000!!END! 1854!X=680.85, 4860.91, 102.28, 0.000!!END! 1855!X=680.9, 4860.91, 104.47, 0.000!!END! 1856!X=680.95, 4860.91, 103.37, 0.000!!END! 1857!X=681, 4860.91, 102.07, 0.000!!END! 1858!X=681.05, 4860.91, 100.67, 0.000!!END! 1859!X=681.1, 4860.91, 99.65, 0.000!!END! 1860!X=681.15, 4860.91, 102.21, 0.000!!END! 1861!X=681.2, 4860.91, 103.81, 0.000!!END! 1862!X=681.25, 4860.91, 104.61, 0.000!!END! 1863!X=679.85, 4860.96, 100.48, 0.000!!END! 1864!X=679.9, 4860.96, 99.56, 0.000!!END! 1865!X=679.95, 4860.96, 100.6, 0.000!!END! 1866!X=680, 4860.96, 101.82, 0.000!!END! 1867!X=680.05, 4860.96, 102.9, 0.000!!END! 1868!X=680.1, 4860.96, 103.52, 0.000!!END! 1869!X=680.15, 4860.96, 102.95, 0.000!!END! 1870!X=680.2, 4860.96, 102.44, 0.000!!END! 1871!X=680.25, 4860.96, 102.87, 0.000!!END! 1872!X=680.3, 4860.96, 103.7, 0.000!!END! 1873!X=680.35, 4860.96, 103.33, 0.000!!END! 1874!X=680.4, 4860.96, 103.16, 0.000!!END! 1875!X=680.45, 4860.96, 103.45, 0.000!!END! 1876!X=680.5, 4860.96, 104.07, 0.000!!END! 1877!X=680.55, 4860.96, 104.43, 0.000!!END! 1878!X=680.6, 4860.96, 104.82, 0.000!!END! 1879!X=680.65, 4860.96, 105, 0.000!!END! Page 518 2. CALPUFF.INP 68 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1880!X=680.7, 4860.96, 104.66, 0.000!!END! 1881!X=680.75, 4860.96, 102.69, 0.000!!END! 1882!X=680.8, 4860.96, 102.32, 0.000!!END! 1883!X=680.85, 4860.96, 103.44, 0.000!!END! 1884!X=680.9, 4860.96, 105.23, 0.000!!END! 1885!X=680.95, 4860.96, 104.01, 0.000!!END! 1886!X=681, 4860.96, 102.55, 0.000!!END! 1887!X=681.05, 4860.96, 101.42, 0.000!!END! 1888!X=681.1, 4860.96, 101.13, 0.000!!END! 1889!X=681.15, 4860.96, 103.8, 0.000!!END! 1890!X=681.2, 4860.96, 104.91, 0.000!!END! 1891!X=681.25, 4860.96, 105.31, 0.000!!END! 1892!X=679.85, 4861.01, 101.9, 0.000!!END! 1893!X=679.9, 4861.01, 100.49, 0.000!!END! 1894!X=679.95, 4861.01, 101.4, 0.000!!END! 1895!X=680, 4861.01, 102.53, 0.000!!END! 1896!X=680.05, 4861.01, 103.54, 0.000!!END! 1897!X=680.1, 4861.01, 104.15, 0.000!!END! 1898!X=680.15, 4861.01, 104.01, 0.000!!END! 1899!X=680.2, 4861.01, 103.42, 0.000!!END! 1900!X=680.25, 4861.01, 103.95, 0.000!!END! 1901!X=680.3, 4861.01, 105.02, 0.000!!END! 1902!X=680.35, 4861.01, 105.1, 0.000!!END! 1903!X=680.4, 4861.01, 104.49, 0.000!!END! 1904!X=680.45, 4861.01, 104.17, 0.000!!END! 1905!X=680.5, 4861.01, 104.1, 0.000!!END! 1906!X=680.55, 4861.01, 103.96, 0.000!!END! 1907!X=680.6, 4861.01, 104.62, 0.000!!END! 1908!X=680.65, 4861.01, 105, 0.000!!END! 1909!X=680.7, 4861.01, 104.86, 0.000!!END! 1910!X=680.75, 4861.01, 104.09, 0.000!!END! 1911!X=680.8, 4861.01, 103.94, 0.000!!END! 1912!X=680.85, 4861.01, 104.71, 0.000!!END! 1913!X=680.9, 4861.01, 105.81, 0.000!!END! 1914!X=680.95, 4861.01, 105, 0.000!!END! 1915!X=681, 4861.01, 103.59, 0.000!!END! 1916!X=681.05, 4861.01, 103.09, 0.000!!END! 1917!X=681.1, 4861.01, 103.84, 0.000!!END! 1918!X=681.15, 4861.01, 106.1, 0.000!!END! 1919!X=681.2, 4861.01, 106.09, 0.000!!END! 1920!X=681.25, 4861.01, 105.85, 0.000!!END! 1921!X=679.85, 4861.06, 104.54, 0.000!!END! 1922!X=679.9, 4861.06, 102.84, 0.000!!END! 1923!X=679.95, 4861.06, 102.55, 0.000!!END! 1924!X=680, 4861.06, 102.86, 0.000!!END! 1925!X=680.05, 4861.06, 103.82, 0.000!!END! 1926!X=680.1, 4861.06, 104.57, 0.000!!END! 1927!X=680.15, 4861.06, 104.03, 0.000!!END! 1928!X=680.2, 4861.06, 103.79, 0.000!!END! 1929!X=680.25, 4861.06, 104.28, 0.000!!END! 1930!X=680.3, 4861.06, 105.13, 0.000!!END! 1931!X=680.35, 4861.06, 105.62, 0.000!!END! 1932!X=680.4, 4861.06, 105.39, 0.000!!END! 1933!X=680.45, 4861.06, 105.25, 0.000!!END! 1934!X=680.5, 4861.06, 104.88, 0.000!!END! 1935!X=680.55, 4861.06, 103.53, 0.000!!END! 1936!X=680.6, 4861.06, 104.1, 0.000!!END! 1937!X=680.65, 4861.06, 104.92, 0.000!!END! 1938!X=680.7, 4861.06, 105.57, 0.000!!END! 1939!X=680.75, 4861.06, 105.6, 0.000!!END! 1940!X=680.8, 4861.06, 105.91, 0.000!!END! 1941!X=680.85, 4861.06, 106.64, 0.000!!END! 1942!X=680.9, 4861.06, 107.24, 0.000!!END! 1943!X=680.95, 4861.06, 106.1, 0.000!!END! 1944!X=681, 4861.06, 105.52, 0.000!!END! 1945!X=681.05, 4861.06, 105.45, 0.000!!END! Page 519 2. CALPUFF.INP 69 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 1946!X=681.1, 4861.06, 105.85, 0.000!!END! 1947!X=681.15, 4861.06, 106.48, 0.000!!END! 1948!X=681.2, 4861.06, 107.24, 0.000!!END! 1949!X=681.25, 4861.06, 107.55, 0.000!!END! 1950!X=679.35, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1951!X=679.45, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1952!X=679.55, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1953!X=679.65, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1954!X=679.75, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1955!X=679.85, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1956!X=679.95, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1957!X=680.05, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1958!X=680.15, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1959!X=680.25, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1960!X=680.35, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1961!X=680.45, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1962!X=680.55, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1963!X=680.65, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1964!X=680.75, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1965!X=680.85, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1966!X=680.95, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1967!X=681.05, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1968!X=681.15, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1969!X=681.25, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1970!X=681.35, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1971!X=681.45, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1972!X=681.55, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1973!X=681.65, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1974!X=681.75, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 1975!X=679.35, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1976!X=679.45, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1977!X=679.55, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1978!X=679.65, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1979!X=679.75, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1980!X=679.85, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1981!X=679.95, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1982!X=680.05, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1983!X=680.15, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1984!X=680.25, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1985!X=680.35, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1986!X=680.45, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1987!X=680.55, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1988!X=680.65, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1989!X=680.75, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1990!X=680.85, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1991!X=680.95, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1992!X=681.05, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1993!X=681.15, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1994!X=681.25, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1995!X=681.35, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1996!X=681.45, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1997!X=681.55, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1998!X=681.65, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 1999!X=681.75, 4859.26, 73, 0.000!!END! 2000!X=679.35, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2001!X=679.45, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2002!X=679.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2003!X=679.65, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2004!X=679.75, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2005!X=679.85, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2006!X=679.95, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2007!X=680.05, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2008!X=680.15, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2009!X=680.25, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2010!X=680.35, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2011!X=680.45, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 520 2. CALPUFF.INP 70 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2012!X=680.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2013!X=680.65, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2014!X=680.75, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2015!X=680.85, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2016!X=680.95, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2017!X=681.05, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2018!X=681.15, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2019!X=681.25, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2020!X=681.35, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2021!X=681.45, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2022!X=681.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2023!X=681.65, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2024!X=681.75, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2025!X=679.35, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2026!X=679.45, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2027!X=679.55, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2028!X=679.65, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2029!X=679.75, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2030!X=679.85, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2031!X=679.95, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2032!X=680.05, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2033!X=680.15, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2034!X=680.25, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2035!X=680.35, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2036!X=680.45, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2037!X=680.55, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2038!X=680.65, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2039!X=680.75, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2040!X=680.85, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2041!X=680.95, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2042!X=681.05, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2043!X=681.15, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2044!X=681.25, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2045!X=681.35, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2046!X=681.45, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2047!X=681.55, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2048!X=681.65, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2049!X=681.75, 4859.46, 73, 0.000!!END! 2050!X=679.35, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2051!X=679.45, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2052!X=679.55, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2053!X=679.65, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2054!X=679.75, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2055!X=679.85, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2056!X=679.95, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2057!X=680.05, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2058!X=680.15, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2059!X=680.25, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2060!X=680.35, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2061!X=680.45, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2062!X=680.55, 4859.56, 74.46, 0.000!!END! 2063!X=680.65, 4859.56, 73.34, 0.000!!END! 2064!X=680.75, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2065!X=680.85, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2066!X=680.95, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2067!X=681.05, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2068!X=681.15, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2069!X=681.25, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2070!X=681.35, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2071!X=681.45, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2072!X=681.55, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2073!X=681.65, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2074!X=681.75, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2075!X=679.35, 4859.66, 76.32, 0.000!!END! 2076!X=679.45, 4859.66, 74.68, 0.000!!END! 2077!X=679.55, 4859.66, 74.11, 0.000!!END! Page 521 2. CALPUFF.INP 71 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2078!X=679.65, 4859.66, 75.18, 0.000!!END! 2079!X=679.75, 4859.66, 74.43, 0.000!!END! 2080!X=681.35, 4859.66, 73, 0.000!!END! 2081!X=681.45, 4859.66, 73, 0.000!!END! 2082!X=681.55, 4859.66, 73, 0.000!!END! 2083!X=681.65, 4859.66, 73, 0.000!!END! 2084!X=681.75, 4859.66, 73, 0.000!!END! 2085!X=679.35, 4859.76, 82.46, 0.000!!END! 2086!X=679.45, 4859.76, 82.05, 0.000!!END! 2087!X=679.55, 4859.76, 81.77, 0.000!!END! 2088!X=679.65, 4859.76, 79.33, 0.000!!END! 2089!X=679.75, 4859.76, 77.43, 0.000!!END! 2090!X=681.35, 4859.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2091!X=681.45, 4859.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2092!X=681.55, 4859.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2093!X=681.65, 4859.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2094!X=681.75, 4859.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2095!X=679.35, 4859.86, 86.05, 0.000!!END! 2096!X=679.45, 4859.86, 87.75, 0.000!!END! 2097!X=679.55, 4859.86, 84.33, 0.000!!END! 2098!X=679.65, 4859.86, 81.79, 0.000!!END! 2099!X=679.75, 4859.86, 79.73, 0.000!!END! 2100!X=681.35, 4859.86, 79.3, 0.000!!END! 2101!X=681.45, 4859.86, 78.28, 0.000!!END! 2102!X=681.55, 4859.86, 77.13, 0.000!!END! 2103!X=681.65, 4859.86, 76.51, 0.000!!END! 2104!X=681.75, 4859.86, 75.75, 0.000!!END! 2105!X=679.35, 4859.96, 89.4, 0.000!!END! 2106!X=679.45, 4859.96, 87.7, 0.000!!END! 2107!X=679.55, 4859.96, 84.27, 0.000!!END! 2108!X=679.65, 4859.96, 80.91, 0.000!!END! 2109!X=679.75, 4859.96, 79.04, 0.000!!END! 2110!X=681.35, 4859.96, 91.96, 0.000!!END! 2111!X=681.45, 4859.96, 90.26, 0.000!!END! 2112!X=681.55, 4859.96, 88.39, 0.000!!END! 2113!X=681.65, 4859.96, 87.25, 0.000!!END! 2114!X=681.75, 4859.96, 86.39, 0.000!!END! 2115!X=679.35, 4860.06, 88.47, 0.000!!END! 2116!X=679.45, 4860.06, 83.64, 0.000!!END! 2117!X=679.55, 4860.06, 80.67, 0.000!!END! 2118!X=679.65, 4860.06, 79.06, 0.000!!END! 2119!X=679.75, 4860.06, 79.62, 0.000!!END! 2120!X=681.35, 4860.06, 96.1, 0.000!!END! 2121!X=681.45, 4860.06, 95.09, 0.000!!END! 2122!X=681.55, 4860.06, 93.28, 0.000!!END! 2123!X=681.65, 4860.06, 92.06, 0.000!!END! 2124!X=681.75, 4860.06, 94.07, 0.000!!END! 2125!X=679.35, 4860.16, 86.31, 0.000!!END! 2126!X=679.45, 4860.16, 82.72, 0.000!!END! 2127!X=679.55, 4860.16, 79.58, 0.000!!END! 2128!X=679.65, 4860.16, 80.28, 0.000!!END! 2129!X=679.75, 4860.16, 80.71, 0.000!!END! 2130!X=681.35, 4860.16, 96.83, 0.000!!END! 2131!X=681.45, 4860.16, 97.84, 0.000!!END! 2132!X=681.55, 4860.16, 94.97, 0.000!!END! 2133!X=681.65, 4860.16, 93.12, 0.000!!END! 2134!X=681.75, 4860.16, 94.91, 0.000!!END! 2135!X=679.35, 4860.26, 86.47, 0.000!!END! 2136!X=679.45, 4860.26, 82.89, 0.000!!END! 2137!X=679.55, 4860.26, 80.84, 0.000!!END! 2138!X=679.65, 4860.26, 82.26, 0.000!!END! 2139!X=679.75, 4860.26, 82.1, 0.000!!END! 2140!X=681.35, 4860.26, 100.38, 0.000!!END! 2141!X=681.45, 4860.26, 97.54, 0.000!!END! 2142!X=681.55, 4860.26, 95.67, 0.000!!END! 2143!X=681.65, 4860.26, 95.27, 0.000!!END! Page 522 2. CALPUFF.INP 72 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2144!X=681.75, 4860.26, 95.72, 0.000!!END! 2145!X=679.35, 4860.36, 85.38, 0.000!!END! 2146!X=679.45, 4860.36, 83.44, 0.000!!END! 2147!X=679.55, 4860.36, 82.83, 0.000!!END! 2148!X=679.65, 4860.36, 84.42, 0.000!!END! 2149!X=679.75, 4860.36, 86.5, 0.000!!END! 2150!X=681.35, 4860.36, 100.54, 0.000!!END! 2151!X=681.45, 4860.36, 94.71, 0.000!!END! 2152!X=681.55, 4860.36, 96, 0.000!!END! 2153!X=681.65, 4860.36, 96.81, 0.000!!END! 2154!X=681.75, 4860.36, 97.85, 0.000!!END! 2155!X=679.35, 4860.46, 88.75, 0.000!!END! 2156!X=679.45, 4860.46, 86.96, 0.000!!END! 2157!X=679.55, 4860.46, 85.37, 0.000!!END! 2158!X=679.65, 4860.46, 86.97, 0.000!!END! 2159!X=679.75, 4860.46, 90.03, 0.000!!END! 2160!X=681.35, 4860.46, 97.04, 0.000!!END! 2161!X=681.45, 4860.46, 97.42, 0.000!!END! 2162!X=681.55, 4860.46, 97.18, 0.000!!END! 2163!X=681.65, 4860.46, 98.63, 0.000!!END! 2164!X=681.75, 4860.46, 98.86, 0.000!!END! 2165!X=679.35, 4860.56, 93.99, 0.000!!END! 2166!X=679.45, 4860.56, 90.85, 0.000!!END! 2167!X=679.55, 4860.56, 85.95, 0.000!!END! 2168!X=679.65, 4860.56, 87.79, 0.000!!END! 2169!X=679.75, 4860.56, 92.54, 0.000!!END! 2170!X=681.35, 4860.56, 98.91, 0.000!!END! 2171!X=681.45, 4860.56, 97.85, 0.000!!END! 2172!X=681.55, 4860.56, 97.62, 0.000!!END! 2173!X=681.65, 4860.56, 100.26, 0.000!!END! 2174!X=681.75, 4860.56, 104.53, 0.000!!END! 2175!X=679.35, 4860.66, 96.76, 0.000!!END! 2176!X=679.45, 4860.66, 93.9, 0.000!!END! 2177!X=679.55, 4860.66, 90.31, 0.000!!END! 2178!X=679.65, 4860.66, 90.97, 0.000!!END! 2179!X=679.75, 4860.66, 94.33, 0.000!!END! 2180!X=681.35, 4860.66, 101.28, 0.000!!END! 2181!X=681.45, 4860.66, 98.27, 0.000!!END! 2182!X=681.55, 4860.66, 98.98, 0.000!!END! 2183!X=681.65, 4860.66, 100.56, 0.000!!END! 2184!X=681.75, 4860.66, 110.12, 0.000!!END! 2185!X=679.35, 4860.76, 97.11, 0.000!!END! 2186!X=679.45, 4860.76, 94.54, 0.000!!END! 2187!X=679.55, 4860.76, 93.42, 0.000!!END! 2188!X=679.65, 4860.76, 94.91, 0.000!!END! 2189!X=679.75, 4860.76, 96.85, 0.000!!END! 2190!X=681.35, 4860.76, 104.31, 0.000!!END! 2191!X=681.45, 4860.76, 105.05, 0.000!!END! 2192!X=681.55, 4860.76, 105.63, 0.000!!END! 2193!X=681.65, 4860.76, 105.07, 0.000!!END! 2194!X=681.75, 4860.76, 110.77, 0.000!!END! 2195!X=679.35, 4860.86, 97.95, 0.000!!END! 2196!X=679.45, 4860.86, 96.18, 0.000!!END! 2197!X=679.55, 4860.86, 94.73, 0.000!!END! 2198!X=679.65, 4860.86, 97.52, 0.000!!END! 2199!X=679.75, 4860.86, 98.27, 0.000!!END! 2200!X=681.35, 4860.86, 105.47, 0.000!!END! 2201!X=681.45, 4860.86, 108.46, 0.000!!END! 2202!X=681.55, 4860.86, 108.39, 0.000!!END! 2203!X=681.65, 4860.86, 107.91, 0.000!!END! 2204!X=681.75, 4860.86, 110.88, 0.000!!END! 2205!X=679.35, 4860.96, 99.74, 0.000!!END! 2206!X=679.45, 4860.96, 97.81, 0.000!!END! 2207!X=679.55, 4860.96, 95.05, 0.000!!END! 2208!X=679.65, 4860.96, 97.09, 0.000!!END! 2209!X=679.75, 4860.96, 101.6, 0.000!!END! Page 523 2. CALPUFF.INP 73 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2210!X=681.35, 4860.96, 109.08, 0.000!!END! 2211!X=681.45, 4860.96, 111.67, 0.000!!END! 2212!X=681.55, 4860.96, 113.22, 0.000!!END! 2213!X=681.65, 4860.96, 115.88, 0.000!!END! 2214!X=681.75, 4860.96, 118.54, 0.000!!END! 2215!X=679.35, 4861.06, 100, 0.000!!END! 2216!X=679.45, 4861.06, 99.36, 0.000!!END! 2217!X=679.55, 4861.06, 96.76, 0.000!!END! 2218!X=679.65, 4861.06, 97.86, 0.000!!END! 2219!X=679.75, 4861.06, 105.45, 0.000!!END! 2220!X=681.35, 4861.06, 111.11, 0.000!!END! 2221!X=681.45, 4861.06, 114.82, 0.000!!END! 2222!X=681.55, 4861.06, 120.94, 0.000!!END! 2223!X=681.65, 4861.06, 125.15, 0.000!!END! 2224!X=681.75, 4861.06, 122.68, 0.000!!END! 2225!X=679.35, 4861.16, 99.05, 0.000!!END! 2226!X=679.45, 4861.16, 99.55, 0.000!!END! 2227!X=679.55, 4861.16, 99.85, 0.000!!END! 2228!X=679.65, 4861.16, 100.98, 0.000!!END! 2229!X=679.75, 4861.16, 104.19, 0.000!!END! 2230!X=679.85, 4861.16, 104.63, 0.000!!END! 2231!X=679.95, 4861.16, 103.02, 0.000!!END! 2232!X=680.05, 4861.16, 104.42, 0.000!!END! 2233!X=680.15, 4861.16, 104.79, 0.000!!END! 2234!X=680.25, 4861.16, 104.12, 0.000!!END! 2235!X=680.35, 4861.16, 105.98, 0.000!!END! 2236!X=680.45, 4861.16, 104.96, 0.000!!END! 2237!X=680.55, 4861.16, 103.7, 0.000!!END! 2238!X=680.65, 4861.16, 105.58, 0.000!!END! 2239!X=680.75, 4861.16, 106.98, 0.000!!END! 2240!X=680.85, 4861.16, 108.98, 0.000!!END! 2241!X=680.95, 4861.16, 108.75, 0.000!!END! 2242!X=681.05, 4861.16, 109.81, 0.000!!END! 2243!X=681.15, 4861.16, 109.52, 0.000!!END! 2244!X=681.25, 4861.16, 111.21, 0.000!!END! 2245!X=681.35, 4861.16, 111.39, 0.000!!END! 2246!X=681.45, 4861.16, 115.91, 0.000!!END! 2247!X=681.55, 4861.16, 118.75, 0.000!!END! 2248!X=681.65, 4861.16, 118.25, 0.000!!END! 2249!X=681.75, 4861.16, 119.17, 0.000!!END! 2250!X=679.35, 4861.26, 101.3, 0.000!!END! 2251!X=679.45, 4861.26, 101.24, 0.000!!END! 2252!X=679.55, 4861.26, 102.32, 0.000!!END! 2253!X=679.65, 4861.26, 104.18, 0.000!!END! 2254!X=679.75, 4861.26, 105.69, 0.000!!END! 2255!X=679.85, 4861.26, 100.48, 0.000!!END! 2256!X=679.95, 4861.26, 102.24, 0.000!!END! 2257!X=680.05, 4861.26, 105.45, 0.000!!END! 2258!X=680.15, 4861.26, 104.99, 0.000!!END! 2259!X=680.25, 4861.26, 105.29, 0.000!!END! 2260!X=680.35, 4861.26, 105.99, 0.000!!END! 2261!X=680.45, 4861.26, 105.26, 0.000!!END! 2262!X=680.55, 4861.26, 104.77, 0.000!!END! 2263!X=680.65, 4861.26, 106.74, 0.000!!END! 2264!X=680.75, 4861.26, 108.39, 0.000!!END! 2265!X=680.85, 4861.26, 111.47, 0.000!!END! 2266!X=680.95, 4861.26, 112.55, 0.000!!END! 2267!X=681.05, 4861.26, 113.01, 0.000!!END! 2268!X=681.15, 4861.26, 111.89, 0.000!!END! 2269!X=681.25, 4861.26, 111.7, 0.000!!END! 2270!X=681.35, 4861.26, 110.99, 0.000!!END! 2271!X=681.45, 4861.26, 116.05, 0.000!!END! 2272!X=681.55, 4861.26, 118.11, 0.000!!END! 2273!X=681.65, 4861.26, 115.18, 0.000!!END! 2274!X=681.75, 4861.26, 116.28, 0.000!!END! 2275!X=679.35, 4861.36, 104.65, 0.000!!END! Page 524 2. CALPUFF.INP 74 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2276!X=679.45, 4861.36, 104.81, 0.000!!END! 2277!X=679.55, 4861.36, 107.11, 0.000!!END! 2278!X=679.65, 4861.36, 105.2, 0.000!!END! 2279!X=679.75, 4861.36, 103.52, 0.000!!END! 2280!X=679.85, 4861.36, 100.46, 0.000!!END! 2281!X=679.95, 4861.36, 106.11, 0.000!!END! 2282!X=680.05, 4861.36, 107.55, 0.000!!END! 2283!X=680.15, 4861.36, 106.82, 0.000!!END! 2284!X=680.25, 4861.36, 106.5, 0.000!!END! 2285!X=680.35, 4861.36, 105.17, 0.000!!END! 2286!X=680.45, 4861.36, 105.92, 0.000!!END! 2287!X=680.55, 4861.36, 105.05, 0.000!!END! 2288!X=680.65, 4861.36, 107.98, 0.000!!END! 2289!X=680.75, 4861.36, 111.37, 0.000!!END! 2290!X=680.85, 4861.36, 114.09, 0.000!!END! 2291!X=680.95, 4861.36, 116.15, 0.000!!END! 2292!X=681.05, 4861.36, 115.7, 0.000!!END! 2293!X=681.15, 4861.36, 112.32, 0.000!!END! 2294!X=681.25, 4861.36, 112.88, 0.000!!END! 2295!X=681.35, 4861.36, 110.61, 0.000!!END! 2296!X=681.45, 4861.36, 114.39, 0.000!!END! 2297!X=681.55, 4861.36, 115.4, 0.000!!END! 2298!X=681.65, 4861.36, 115.97, 0.000!!END! 2299!X=681.75, 4861.36, 116.52, 0.000!!END! 2300!X=679.35, 4861.46, 109.45, 0.000!!END! 2301!X=679.45, 4861.46, 108.27, 0.000!!END! 2302!X=679.55, 4861.46, 107.8, 0.000!!END! 2303!X=679.65, 4861.46, 105.62, 0.000!!END! 2304!X=679.75, 4861.46, 101.9, 0.000!!END! 2305!X=679.85, 4861.46, 102.44, 0.000!!END! 2306!X=679.95, 4861.46, 107.48, 0.000!!END! 2307!X=680.05, 4861.46, 105.9, 0.000!!END! 2308!X=680.15, 4861.46, 106.92, 0.000!!END! 2309!X=680.25, 4861.46, 107.62, 0.000!!END! 2310!X=680.35, 4861.46, 107.92, 0.000!!END! 2311!X=680.45, 4861.46, 106.75, 0.000!!END! 2312!X=680.55, 4861.46, 105.27, 0.000!!END! 2313!X=680.65, 4861.46, 109.08, 0.000!!END! 2314!X=680.75, 4861.46, 112.29, 0.000!!END! 2315!X=680.85, 4861.46, 115.78, 0.000!!END! 2316!X=680.95, 4861.46, 116.26, 0.000!!END! 2317!X=681.05, 4861.46, 116.01, 0.000!!END! 2318!X=681.15, 4861.46, 114.6, 0.000!!END! 2319!X=681.25, 4861.46, 116.83, 0.000!!END! 2320!X=681.35, 4861.46, 115.04, 0.000!!END! 2321!X=681.45, 4861.46, 114.67, 0.000!!END! 2322!X=681.55, 4861.46, 114.63, 0.000!!END! 2323!X=681.65, 4861.46, 115.42, 0.000!!END! 2324!X=681.75, 4861.46, 114.89, 0.000!!END! 2325!X=679.35, 4861.56, 113.53, 0.000!!END! 2326!X=679.45, 4861.56, 110.59, 0.000!!END! 2327!X=679.55, 4861.56, 107.42, 0.000!!END! 2328!X=679.65, 4861.56, 105.55, 0.000!!END! 2329!X=679.75, 4861.56, 103.68, 0.000!!END! 2330!X=679.85, 4861.56, 104.2, 0.000!!END! 2331!X=679.95, 4861.56, 105, 0.000!!END! 2332!X=680.05, 4861.56, 104.61, 0.000!!END! 2333!X=680.15, 4861.56, 104.93, 0.000!!END! 2334!X=680.25, 4861.56, 109.3, 0.000!!END! 2335!X=680.35, 4861.56, 110.96, 0.000!!END! 2336!X=680.45, 4861.56, 108.85, 0.000!!END! 2337!X=680.55, 4861.56, 107.26, 0.000!!END! 2338!X=680.65, 4861.56, 110.83, 0.000!!END! 2339!X=680.75, 4861.56, 112.74, 0.000!!END! 2340!X=680.85, 4861.56, 114.26, 0.000!!END! 2341!X=680.95, 4861.56, 117.86, 0.000!!END! Page 525 2. CALPUFF.INP 75 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2342!X=681.05, 4861.56, 118.5, 0.000!!END! 2343!X=681.15, 4861.56, 118.39, 0.000!!END! 2344!X=681.25, 4861.56, 119.57, 0.000!!END! 2345!X=681.35, 4861.56, 120.75, 0.000!!END! 2346!X=681.45, 4861.56, 119.68, 0.000!!END! 2347!X=681.55, 4861.56, 115.65, 0.000!!END! 2348!X=681.65, 4861.56, 115.37, 0.000!!END! 2349!X=681.75, 4861.56, 114.69, 0.000!!END! 2350!X=678.35, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2351!X=678.55, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2352!X=678.75, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2353!X=678.95, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2354!X=679.15, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2355!X=679.35, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2356!X=679.55, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2357!X=679.75, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2358!X=679.95, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2359!X=680.15, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2360!X=680.35, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2361!X=680.55, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2362!X=680.75, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2363!X=680.95, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2364!X=681.15, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2365!X=681.35, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2366!X=681.55, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2367!X=681.75, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2368!X=681.95, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2369!X=682.15, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2370!X=682.35, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2371!X=682.55, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2372!X=682.75, 4858.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2373!X=678.35, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2374!X=678.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2375!X=678.75, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2376!X=678.95, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2377!X=679.15, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2378!X=679.35, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2379!X=679.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2380!X=679.75, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2381!X=679.95, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2382!X=680.15, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2383!X=680.35, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2384!X=680.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2385!X=680.75, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2386!X=680.95, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2387!X=681.15, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2388!X=681.35, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2389!X=681.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2390!X=681.75, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2391!X=681.95, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2392!X=682.15, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2393!X=682.35, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2394!X=682.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2395!X=682.75, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2396!X=678.35, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2397!X=678.55, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2398!X=678.75, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2399!X=678.95, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2400!X=679.15, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2401!X=679.35, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2402!X=679.55, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2403!X=679.75, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2404!X=679.95, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2405!X=680.15, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2406!X=680.35, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2407!X=680.55, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 526 2. CALPUFF.INP 76 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2408!X=680.75, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2409!X=680.95, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2410!X=681.15, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2411!X=681.35, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2412!X=681.55, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2413!X=681.75, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2414!X=681.95, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2415!X=682.15, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2416!X=682.35, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2417!X=682.55, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2418!X=682.75, 4858.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2419!X=678.35, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2420!X=678.55, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2421!X=678.75, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2422!X=678.95, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2423!X=679.15, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2424!X=679.35, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2425!X=679.55, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2426!X=679.75, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2427!X=679.95, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2428!X=680.15, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2429!X=680.35, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2430!X=680.55, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2431!X=680.75, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2432!X=680.95, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2433!X=681.15, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2434!X=681.35, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2435!X=681.55, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2436!X=681.75, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2437!X=681.95, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2438!X=682.15, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2439!X=682.35, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2440!X=682.55, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2441!X=682.75, 4858.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2442!X=678.35, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2443!X=678.55, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2444!X=678.75, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2445!X=678.95, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2446!X=679.15, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2447!X=679.35, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2448!X=679.55, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2449!X=679.75, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2450!X=679.95, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2451!X=680.15, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2452!X=680.35, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2453!X=680.55, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2454!X=680.75, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2455!X=680.95, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2456!X=681.15, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2457!X=681.35, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2458!X=681.55, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2459!X=681.75, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2460!X=681.95, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2461!X=682.15, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2462!X=682.35, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2463!X=682.55, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2464!X=682.75, 4858.96, 73, 0.000!!END! 2465!X=678.35, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2466!X=678.55, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2467!X=678.75, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2468!X=678.95, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2469!X=679.15, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2470!X=681.95, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2471!X=682.15, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2472!X=682.35, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2473!X=682.55, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 527 2. CALPUFF.INP 77 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2474!X=682.75, 4859.16, 73, 0.000!!END! 2475!X=678.35, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2476!X=678.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2477!X=678.75, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2478!X=678.95, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2479!X=679.15, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2480!X=681.95, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2481!X=682.15, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2482!X=682.35, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2483!X=682.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2484!X=682.75, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 2485!X=678.35, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2486!X=678.55, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2487!X=678.75, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2488!X=678.95, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2489!X=679.15, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2490!X=681.95, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2491!X=682.15, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2492!X=682.35, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2493!X=682.55, 4859.56, 73, 0.000!!END! 2494!X=682.75, 4859.56, 75.25, 0.000!!END! 2495!X=678.35, 4859.76, 75.24, 0.000!!END! 2496!X=678.55, 4859.76, 79.96, 0.000!!END! 2497!X=678.75, 4859.76, 88.47, 0.000!!END! 2498!X=678.95, 4859.76, 88.93, 0.000!!END! 2499!X=679.15, 4859.76, 84.72, 0.000!!END! 2500!X=681.95, 4859.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2501!X=682.15, 4859.76, 73, 0.000!!END! 2502!X=682.35, 4859.76, 77.74, 0.000!!END! 2503!X=682.55, 4859.76, 78.61, 0.000!!END! 2504!X=682.75, 4859.76, 82.56, 0.000!!END! 2505!X=678.35, 4859.96, 83.25, 0.000!!END! 2506!X=678.55, 4859.96, 87.03, 0.000!!END! 2507!X=678.75, 4859.96, 96.42, 0.000!!END! 2508!X=678.95, 4859.96, 92.49, 0.000!!END! 2509!X=679.15, 4859.96, 87.7, 0.000!!END! 2510!X=681.95, 4859.96, 84.53, 0.000!!END! 2511!X=682.15, 4859.96, 86.54, 0.000!!END! 2512!X=682.35, 4859.96, 84.38, 0.000!!END! 2513!X=682.55, 4859.96, 79.25, 0.000!!END! 2514!X=682.75, 4859.96, 91.34, 0.000!!END! 2515!X=678.35, 4860.16, 88.76, 0.000!!END! 2516!X=678.55, 4860.16, 95.49, 0.000!!END! 2517!X=678.75, 4860.16, 99.96, 0.000!!END! 2518!X=678.95, 4860.16, 91.1, 0.000!!END! 2519!X=679.15, 4860.16, 89.56, 0.000!!END! 2520!X=681.95, 4860.16, 99.03, 0.000!!END! 2521!X=682.15, 4860.16, 97.93, 0.000!!END! 2522!X=682.35, 4860.16, 98.3, 0.000!!END! 2523!X=682.55, 4860.16, 92.73, 0.000!!END! 2524!X=682.75, 4860.16, 85.16, 0.000!!END! 2525!X=678.35, 4860.36, 98.46, 0.000!!END! 2526!X=678.55, 4860.36, 99.95, 0.000!!END! 2527!X=678.75, 4860.36, 94.74, 0.000!!END! 2528!X=678.95, 4860.36, 88.61, 0.000!!END! 2529!X=679.15, 4860.36, 88.5, 0.000!!END! 2530!X=681.95, 4860.36, 100.1, 0.000!!END! 2531!X=682.15, 4860.36, 99.62, 0.000!!END! 2532!X=682.35, 4860.36, 102.25, 0.000!!END! 2533!X=682.55, 4860.36, 104.29, 0.000!!END! 2534!X=682.75, 4860.36, 107.88, 0.000!!END! 2535!X=678.35, 4860.56, 92.83, 0.000!!END! 2536!X=678.55, 4860.56, 93.57, 0.000!!END! 2537!X=678.75, 4860.56, 91.28, 0.000!!END! 2538!X=678.95, 4860.56, 90.53, 0.000!!END! 2539!X=679.15, 4860.56, 91.06, 0.000!!END! Page 528 2. CALPUFF.INP 78 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2540!X=681.95, 4860.56, 123.19, 0.000!!END! 2541!X=682.15, 4860.56, 107.95, 0.000!!END! 2542!X=682.35, 4860.56, 106.58, 0.000!!END! 2543!X=682.55, 4860.56, 107.19, 0.000!!END! 2544!X=682.75, 4860.56, 111.25, 0.000!!END! 2545!X=678.35, 4860.76, 98.99, 0.000!!END! 2546!X=678.55, 4860.76, 97.82, 0.000!!END! 2547!X=678.75, 4860.76, 95.6, 0.000!!END! 2548!X=678.95, 4860.76, 94.07, 0.000!!END! 2549!X=679.15, 4860.76, 96.23, 0.000!!END! 2550!X=681.95, 4860.76, 127.55, 0.000!!END! 2551!X=682.15, 4860.76, 113.42, 0.000!!END! 2552!X=682.35, 4860.76, 109.82, 0.000!!END! 2553!X=682.55, 4860.76, 114.22, 0.000!!END! 2554!X=682.75, 4860.76, 121.29, 0.000!!END! 2555!X=678.35, 4860.96, 102.41, 0.000!!END! 2556!X=678.55, 4860.96, 97.43, 0.000!!END! 2557!X=678.75, 4860.96, 99, 0.000!!END! 2558!X=678.95, 4860.96, 99.91, 0.000!!END! 2559!X=679.15, 4860.96, 102.69, 0.000!!END! 2560!X=681.95, 4860.96, 130.36, 0.000!!END! 2561!X=682.15, 4860.96, 120.44, 0.000!!END! 2562!X=682.35, 4860.96, 121.93, 0.000!!END! 2563!X=682.55, 4860.96, 121.43, 0.000!!END! 2564!X=682.75, 4860.96, 125.96, 0.000!!END! 2565!X=678.35, 4861.16, 108.08, 0.000!!END! 2566!X=678.55, 4861.16, 106.06, 0.000!!END! 2567!X=678.75, 4861.16, 102.76, 0.000!!END! 2568!X=678.95, 4861.16, 101.72, 0.000!!END! 2569!X=679.15, 4861.16, 102.01, 0.000!!END! 2570!X=681.95, 4861.16, 126.29, 0.000!!END! 2571!X=682.15, 4861.16, 124.2, 0.000!!END! 2572!X=682.35, 4861.16, 127.17, 0.000!!END! 2573!X=682.55, 4861.16, 126.75, 0.000!!END! 2574!X=682.75, 4861.16, 133.26, 0.000!!END! 2575!X=678.35, 4861.36, 117.15, 0.000!!END! 2576!X=678.55, 4861.36, 115.97, 0.000!!END! 2577!X=678.75, 4861.36, 112.65, 0.000!!END! 2578!X=678.95, 4861.36, 110.03, 0.000!!END! 2579!X=679.15, 4861.36, 107.25, 0.000!!END! 2580!X=681.95, 4861.36, 117.77, 0.000!!END! 2581!X=682.15, 4861.36, 122.58, 0.000!!END! 2582!X=682.35, 4861.36, 123.82, 0.000!!END! 2583!X=682.55, 4861.36, 126.73, 0.000!!END! 2584!X=682.75, 4861.36, 127.61, 0.000!!END! 2585!X=678.35, 4861.56, 117.49, 0.000!!END! 2586!X=678.55, 4861.56, 120.28, 0.000!!END! 2587!X=678.75, 4861.56, 117.56, 0.000!!END! 2588!X=678.95, 4861.56, 117.05, 0.000!!END! 2589!X=679.15, 4861.56, 111.99, 0.000!!END! 2590!X=681.95, 4861.56, 116.42, 0.000!!END! 2591!X=682.15, 4861.56, 116.86, 0.000!!END! 2592!X=682.35, 4861.56, 116.49, 0.000!!END! 2593!X=682.55, 4861.56, 130.35, 0.000!!END! 2594!X=682.75, 4861.56, 116.06, 0.000!!END! 2595!X=678.35, 4861.76, 118.88, 0.000!!END! 2596!X=678.55, 4861.76, 123.13, 0.000!!END! 2597!X=678.75, 4861.76, 124.46, 0.000!!END! 2598!X=678.95, 4861.76, 118.51, 0.000!!END! 2599!X=679.15, 4861.76, 115.92, 0.000!!END! 2600!X=679.35, 4861.76, 117, 0.000!!END! 2601!X=679.55, 4861.76, 109.5, 0.000!!END! 2602!X=679.75, 4861.76, 107.43, 0.000!!END! 2603!X=679.95, 4861.76, 105.6, 0.000!!END! 2604!X=680.15, 4861.76, 111.28, 0.000!!END! 2605!X=680.35, 4861.76, 112.44, 0.000!!END! Page 529 2. CALPUFF.INP 79 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2606!X=680.55, 4861.76, 119.18, 0.000!!END! 2607!X=680.75, 4861.76, 116.37, 0.000!!END! 2608!X=680.95, 4861.76, 117.84, 0.000!!END! 2609!X=681.15, 4861.76, 130.51, 0.000!!END! 2610!X=681.35, 4861.76, 126.03, 0.000!!END! 2611!X=681.55, 4861.76, 115.73, 0.000!!END! 2612!X=681.75, 4861.76, 114.9, 0.000!!END! 2613!X=681.95, 4861.76, 113.58, 0.000!!END! 2614!X=682.15, 4861.76, 114.32, 0.000!!END! 2615!X=682.35, 4861.76, 119.75, 0.000!!END! 2616!X=682.55, 4861.76, 122.64, 0.000!!END! 2617!X=682.75, 4861.76, 112.5, 0.000!!END! 2618!X=678.35, 4861.96, 125.33, 0.000!!END! 2619!X=678.55, 4861.96, 124.63, 0.000!!END! 2620!X=678.75, 4861.96, 126.83, 0.000!!END! 2621!X=678.95, 4861.96, 119.96, 0.000!!END! 2622!X=679.15, 4861.96, 117, 0.000!!END! 2623!X=679.35, 4861.96, 114.04, 0.000!!END! 2624!X=679.55, 4861.96, 111.68, 0.000!!END! 2625!X=679.75, 4861.96, 114.3, 0.000!!END! 2626!X=679.95, 4861.96, 116.87, 0.000!!END! 2627!X=680.15, 4861.96, 119.66, 0.000!!END! 2628!X=680.35, 4861.96, 118.41, 0.000!!END! 2629!X=680.55, 4861.96, 118.82, 0.000!!END! 2630!X=680.75, 4861.96, 122.11, 0.000!!END! 2631!X=680.95, 4861.96, 125.71, 0.000!!END! 2632!X=681.15, 4861.96, 128.32, 0.000!!END! 2633!X=681.35, 4861.96, 116.23, 0.000!!END! 2634!X=681.55, 4861.96, 116.3, 0.000!!END! 2635!X=681.75, 4861.96, 113.75, 0.000!!END! 2636!X=681.95, 4861.96, 112.18, 0.000!!END! 2637!X=682.15, 4861.96, 115.01, 0.000!!END! 2638!X=682.35, 4861.96, 119.81, 0.000!!END! 2639!X=682.55, 4861.96, 112.8, 0.000!!END! 2640!X=682.75, 4861.96, 114.34, 0.000!!END! 2641!X=678.35, 4862.16, 126.71, 0.000!!END! 2642!X=678.55, 4862.16, 130.07, 0.000!!END! 2643!X=678.75, 4862.16, 138.47, 0.000!!END! 2644!X=678.95, 4862.16, 117.89, 0.000!!END! 2645!X=679.15, 4862.16, 115.64, 0.000!!END! 2646!X=679.35, 4862.16, 112.69, 0.000!!END! 2647!X=679.55, 4862.16, 109.97, 0.000!!END! 2648!X=679.75, 4862.16, 118.49, 0.000!!END! 2649!X=679.95, 4862.16, 125.46, 0.000!!END! 2650!X=680.15, 4862.16, 133.06, 0.000!!END! 2651!X=680.35, 4862.16, 125.2, 0.000!!END! 2652!X=680.55, 4862.16, 121.03, 0.000!!END! 2653!X=680.75, 4862.16, 124.88, 0.000!!END! 2654!X=680.95, 4862.16, 129.35, 0.000!!END! 2655!X=681.15, 4862.16, 128.32, 0.000!!END! 2656!X=681.35, 4862.16, 124.14, 0.000!!END! 2657!X=681.55, 4862.16, 118.2, 0.000!!END! 2658!X=681.75, 4862.16, 117.72, 0.000!!END! 2659!X=681.95, 4862.16, 114.05, 0.000!!END! 2660!X=682.15, 4862.16, 113.47, 0.000!!END! 2661!X=682.35, 4862.16, 111.9, 0.000!!END! 2662!X=682.55, 4862.16, 112.3, 0.000!!END! 2663!X=682.75, 4862.16, 109.86, 0.000!!END! 2664!X=678.35, 4862.36, 125.65, 0.000!!END! 2665!X=678.55, 4862.36, 131.7, 0.000!!END! 2666!X=678.75, 4862.36, 126.69, 0.000!!END! 2667!X=678.95, 4862.36, 119.56, 0.000!!END! 2668!X=679.15, 4862.36, 118.31, 0.000!!END! 2669!X=679.35, 4862.36, 115.43, 0.000!!END! 2670!X=679.55, 4862.36, 114.84, 0.000!!END! 2671!X=679.75, 4862.36, 116.01, 0.000!!END! Page 530 2. CALPUFF.INP 80 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2672!X=679.95, 4862.36, 122.82, 0.000!!END! 2673!X=680.15, 4862.36, 128.49, 0.000!!END! 2674!X=680.35, 4862.36, 125.11, 0.000!!END! 2675!X=680.55, 4862.36, 125.31, 0.000!!END! 2676!X=680.75, 4862.36, 123.72, 0.000!!END! 2677!X=680.95, 4862.36, 126.56, 0.000!!END! 2678!X=681.15, 4862.36, 130.9, 0.000!!END! 2679!X=681.35, 4862.36, 126.54, 0.000!!END! 2680!X=681.55, 4862.36, 119.87, 0.000!!END! 2681!X=681.75, 4862.36, 120.54, 0.000!!END! 2682!X=681.95, 4862.36, 120.49, 0.000!!END! 2683!X=682.15, 4862.36, 113.93, 0.000!!END! 2684!X=682.35, 4862.36, 112.89, 0.000!!END! 2685!X=682.55, 4862.36, 112.53, 0.000!!END! 2686!X=682.75, 4862.36, 109.12, 0.000!!END! 2687!X=678.35, 4862.56, 129.65, 0.000!!END! 2688!X=678.55, 4862.56, 129.63, 0.000!!END! 2689!X=678.75, 4862.56, 126.1, 0.000!!END! 2690!X=678.95, 4862.56, 121.4, 0.000!!END! 2691!X=679.15, 4862.56, 117.38, 0.000!!END! 2692!X=679.35, 4862.56, 118.19, 0.000!!END! 2693!X=679.55, 4862.56, 116.31, 0.000!!END! 2694!X=679.75, 4862.56, 116.84, 0.000!!END! 2695!X=679.95, 4862.56, 124.8, 0.000!!END! 2696!X=680.15, 4862.56, 128.77, 0.000!!END! 2697!X=680.35, 4862.56, 128.66, 0.000!!END! 2698!X=680.55, 4862.56, 125.52, 0.000!!END! 2699!X=680.75, 4862.56, 122.95, 0.000!!END! 2700!X=680.95, 4862.56, 126.39, 0.000!!END! 2701!X=681.15, 4862.56, 131.22, 0.000!!END! 2702!X=681.35, 4862.56, 128.28, 0.000!!END! 2703!X=681.55, 4862.56, 124.51, 0.000!!END! 2704!X=681.75, 4862.56, 121.34, 0.000!!END! 2705!X=681.95, 4862.56, 116.57, 0.000!!END! 2706!X=682.15, 4862.56, 116.08, 0.000!!END! 2707!X=682.35, 4862.56, 113.53, 0.000!!END! 2708!X=682.55, 4862.56, 108.71, 0.000!!END! 2709!X=682.75, 4862.56, 115.47, 0.000!!END! 2710!X=675.3, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2711!X=675.8, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2712!X=676.3, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2713!X=676.8, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2714!X=677.3, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2715!X=677.8, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2716!X=678.3, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2717!X=678.8, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2718!X=679.3, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2719!X=679.8, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2720!X=680.3, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2721!X=680.8, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2722!X=681.3, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2723!X=681.8, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2724!X=682.3, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2725!X=682.8, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2726!X=683.3, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2727!X=683.8, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2728!X=684.3, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2729!X=684.8, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2730!X=685.3, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2731!X=685.8, 4855.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2732!X=675.3, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2733!X=675.8, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2734!X=676.3, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2735!X=676.8, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2736!X=677.3, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2737!X=677.8, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 531 2. CALPUFF.INP 81 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2738!X=678.3, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2739!X=678.8, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2740!X=679.3, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2741!X=679.8, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2742!X=680.3, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2743!X=680.8, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2744!X=681.3, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2745!X=681.8, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2746!X=682.3, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2747!X=682.8, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2748!X=683.3, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2749!X=683.8, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2750!X=684.3, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2751!X=684.8, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2752!X=685.3, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2753!X=685.8, 4855.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2754!X=675.3, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2755!X=675.8, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2756!X=676.3, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2757!X=676.8, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2758!X=677.3, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2759!X=677.8, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2760!X=678.3, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2761!X=678.8, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2762!X=679.3, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2763!X=679.8, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2764!X=680.3, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2765!X=680.8, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2766!X=681.3, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2767!X=681.8, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2768!X=682.3, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2769!X=682.8, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2770!X=683.3, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2771!X=683.8, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2772!X=684.3, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2773!X=684.8, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2774!X=685.3, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2775!X=685.8, 4856.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2776!X=675.3, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2777!X=675.8, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2778!X=676.3, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2779!X=676.8, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2780!X=677.3, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2781!X=677.8, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2782!X=678.3, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2783!X=678.8, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2784!X=679.3, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2785!X=679.8, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2786!X=680.3, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2787!X=680.8, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2788!X=681.3, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2789!X=681.8, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2790!X=682.3, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2791!X=682.8, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2792!X=683.3, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2793!X=683.8, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2794!X=684.3, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2795!X=684.8, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2796!X=685.3, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2797!X=685.8, 4856.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2798!X=675.3, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2799!X=675.8, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2800!X=676.3, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2801!X=676.8, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2802!X=677.3, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2803!X=677.8, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 532 2. CALPUFF.INP 82 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2804!X=678.3, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2805!X=678.8, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2806!X=679.3, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2807!X=679.8, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2808!X=680.3, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2809!X=680.8, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2810!X=681.3, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2811!X=681.8, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2812!X=682.3, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2813!X=682.8, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2814!X=683.3, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2815!X=683.8, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2816!X=684.3, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2817!X=684.8, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2818!X=685.3, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2819!X=685.8, 4857.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2820!X=675.3, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2821!X=675.8, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2822!X=676.3, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2823!X=676.8, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2824!X=677.3, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2825!X=677.8, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2826!X=678.3, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2827!X=678.8, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2828!X=679.3, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2829!X=679.8, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2830!X=680.3, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2831!X=680.8, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2832!X=681.3, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2833!X=681.8, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2834!X=682.3, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2835!X=682.8, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2836!X=683.3, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2837!X=683.8, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2838!X=684.3, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2839!X=684.8, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2840!X=685.3, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2841!X=685.8, 4857.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2842!X=675.3, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2843!X=675.8, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2844!X=676.3, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2845!X=676.8, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2846!X=677.3, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2847!X=677.8, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2848!X=678.3, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2849!X=678.8, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2850!X=679.3, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2851!X=679.8, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2852!X=680.3, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2853!X=680.8, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2854!X=681.3, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2855!X=681.8, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2856!X=682.3, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2857!X=682.8, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2858!X=683.3, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2859!X=683.8, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2860!X=684.3, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2861!X=684.8, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2862!X=685.3, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2863!X=685.8, 4858.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2864!X=675.3, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2865!X=675.8, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2866!X=676.3, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2867!X=676.8, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2868!X=677.3, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2869!X=677.8, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 533 2. CALPUFF.INP 83 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2870!X=678.3, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2871!X=682.8, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2872!X=683.3, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2873!X=683.8, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2874!X=684.3, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2875!X=684.8, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2876!X=685.3, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2877!X=685.8, 4858.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2878!X=675.3, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2879!X=675.8, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2880!X=676.3, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2881!X=676.8, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2882!X=677.3, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2883!X=677.8, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2884!X=678.3, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2885!X=682.8, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2886!X=683.3, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2887!X=683.8, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2888!X=684.3, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2889!X=684.8, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2890!X=685.3, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2891!X=685.8, 4859.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2892!X=675.3, 4859.61, 77.38, 0.000!!END! 2893!X=675.8, 4859.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2894!X=676.3, 4859.61, 73.48, 0.000!!END! 2895!X=676.8, 4859.61, 74.05, 0.000!!END! 2896!X=677.3, 4859.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2897!X=677.8, 4859.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2898!X=678.3, 4859.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2899!X=682.8, 4859.61, 77.61, 0.000!!END! 2900!X=683.3, 4859.61, 78.36, 0.000!!END! 2901!X=683.8, 4859.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2902!X=684.3, 4859.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2903!X=684.8, 4859.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2904!X=685.3, 4859.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2905!X=685.8, 4859.61, 73, 0.000!!END! 2906!X=675.3, 4860.11, 76.06, 0.000!!END! 2907!X=675.8, 4860.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2908!X=676.3, 4860.11, 74.69, 0.000!!END! 2909!X=676.8, 4860.11, 73.92, 0.000!!END! 2910!X=677.3, 4860.11, 85.67, 0.000!!END! 2911!X=677.8, 4860.11, 93.69, 0.000!!END! 2912!X=678.3, 4860.11, 88.05, 0.000!!END! 2913!X=682.8, 4860.11, 78.66, 0.000!!END! 2914!X=683.3, 4860.11, 85.8, 0.000!!END! 2915!X=683.8, 4860.11, 87.88, 0.000!!END! 2916!X=684.3, 4860.11, 97.92, 0.000!!END! 2917!X=684.8, 4860.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2918!X=685.3, 4860.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2919!X=685.8, 4860.11, 73, 0.000!!END! 2920!X=675.3, 4860.61, 77.07, 0.000!!END! 2921!X=675.8, 4860.61, 74.71, 0.000!!END! 2922!X=676.3, 4860.61, 89.27, 0.000!!END! 2923!X=676.8, 4860.61, 99.36, 0.000!!END! 2924!X=677.3, 4860.61, 104.02, 0.000!!END! 2925!X=677.8, 4860.61, 97.08, 0.000!!END! 2926!X=678.3, 4860.61, 93.68, 0.000!!END! 2927!X=682.8, 4860.61, 111.62, 0.000!!END! 2928!X=683.3, 4860.61, 112.14, 0.000!!END! 2929!X=683.8, 4860.61, 99.69, 0.000!!END! 2930!X=684.3, 4860.61, 91.28, 0.000!!END! 2931!X=684.8, 4860.61, 77.95, 0.000!!END! 2932!X=685.3, 4860.61, 73.65, 0.000!!END! 2933!X=685.8, 4860.61, 82.19, 0.000!!END! 2934!X=675.3, 4861.11, 79.42, 0.000!!END! 2935!X=675.8, 4861.11, 82.66, 0.000!!END! Page 534 2. CALPUFF.INP 84 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 2936!X=676.3, 4861.11, 99.58, 0.000!!END! 2937!X=676.8, 4861.11, 107.29, 0.000!!END! 2938!X=677.3, 4861.11, 95.8, 0.000!!END! 2939!X=677.8, 4861.11, 93.69, 0.000!!END! 2940!X=678.3, 4861.11, 107.21, 0.000!!END! 2941!X=682.8, 4861.11, 129.87, 0.000!!END! 2942!X=683.3, 4861.11, 116.72, 0.000!!END! 2943!X=683.8, 4861.11, 106.95, 0.000!!END! 2944!X=684.3, 4861.11, 93.98, 0.000!!END! 2945!X=684.8, 4861.11, 100.56, 0.000!!END! 2946!X=685.3, 4861.11, 92.95, 0.000!!END! 2947!X=685.8, 4861.11, 91.7, 0.000!!END! 2948!X=675.3, 4861.61, 80.02, 0.000!!END! 2949!X=675.8, 4861.61, 91.18, 0.000!!END! 2950!X=676.3, 4861.61, 106.97, 0.000!!END! 2951!X=676.8, 4861.61, 107.58, 0.000!!END! 2952!X=677.3, 4861.61, 113.61, 0.000!!END! 2953!X=677.8, 4861.61, 110.16, 0.000!!END! 2954!X=678.3, 4861.61, 118.11, 0.000!!END! 2955!X=682.8, 4861.61, 112.07, 0.000!!END! 2956!X=683.3, 4861.61, 103.45, 0.000!!END! 2957!X=683.8, 4861.61, 95.57, 0.000!!END! 2958!X=684.3, 4861.61, 87.41, 0.000!!END! 2959!X=684.8, 4861.61, 81.54, 0.000!!END! 2960!X=685.3, 4861.61, 17.07, 0.000!!END! 2961!X=685.8, 4861.61, 82.85, 0.000!!END! 2962!X=675.3, 4862.11, 88.41, 0.000!!END! 2963!X=675.8, 4862.11, 117.27, 0.000!!END! 2964!X=676.3, 4862.11, 125.65, 0.000!!END! 2965!X=676.8, 4862.11, 121.24, 0.000!!END! 2966!X=677.3, 4862.11, 119.4, 0.000!!END! 2967!X=677.8, 4862.11, 116.05, 0.000!!END! 2968!X=678.3, 4862.11, 126.49, 0.000!!END! 2969!X=682.8, 4862.11, 110.45, 0.000!!END! 2970!X=683.3, 4862.11, 108.55, 0.000!!END! 2971!X=683.8, 4862.11, 109.66, 0.000!!END! 2972!X=684.3, 4862.11, 91.22, 0.000!!END! 2973!X=684.8, 4862.11, 85.07, 0.000!!END! 2974!X=685.3, 4862.11, 73.14, 0.000!!END! 2975!X=685.8, 4862.11, 81.37, 0.000!!END! 2976!X=675.3, 4862.61, 94.57, 0.000!!END! 2977!X=675.8, 4862.61, 117.44, 0.000!!END! 2978!X=676.3, 4862.61, 125.44, 0.000!!END! 2979!X=676.8, 4862.61, 128.58, 0.000!!END! 2980!X=677.3, 4862.61, 114.93, 0.000!!END! 2981!X=677.8, 4862.61, 128, 0.000!!END! 2982!X=678.3, 4862.61, 130.9, 0.000!!END! 2983!X=678.8, 4862.61, 125.42, 0.000!!END! 2984!X=679.3, 4862.61, 119.36, 0.000!!END! 2985!X=679.8, 4862.61, 117.63, 0.000!!END! 2986!X=680.3, 4862.61, 129.3, 0.000!!END! 2987!X=680.8, 4862.61, 125.18, 0.000!!END! 2988!X=681.3, 4862.61, 128.91, 0.000!!END! 2989!X=681.8, 4862.61, 119.59, 0.000!!END! 2990!X=682.3, 4862.61, 113.42, 0.000!!END! 2991!X=682.8, 4862.61, 117.66, 0.000!!END! 2992!X=683.3, 4862.61, 112.07, 0.000!!END! 2993!X=683.8, 4862.61, 107.02, 0.000!!END! 2994!X=684.3, 4862.61, 112.23, 0.000!!END! 2995!X=684.8, 4862.61, 86, 0.000!!END! 2996!X=685.3, 4862.61, 84.79, 0.000!!END! 2997!X=685.8, 4862.61, 85.43, 0.000!!END! 2998!X=675.3, 4863.11, 131.09, 0.000!!END! 2999!X=675.8, 4863.11, 132.6, 0.000!!END! 3000!X=676.3, 4863.11, 118.52, 0.000!!END! 3001!X=676.8, 4863.11, 128.45, 0.000!!END! Page 535 2. CALPUFF.INP 85 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3002!X=677.3, 4863.11, 131.85, 0.000!!END! 3003!X=677.8, 4863.11, 133.71, 0.000!!END! 3004!X=678.3, 4863.11, 133.81, 0.000!!END! 3005!X=678.8, 4863.11, 132.47, 0.000!!END! 3006!X=679.3, 4863.11, 122.81, 0.000!!END! 3007!X=679.8, 4863.11, 125.95, 0.000!!END! 3008!X=680.3, 4863.11, 132.54, 0.000!!END! 3009!X=680.8, 4863.11, 123.67, 0.000!!END! 3010!X=681.3, 4863.11, 127.02, 0.000!!END! 3011!X=681.8, 4863.11, 120.93, 0.000!!END! 3012!X=682.3, 4863.11, 119.04, 0.000!!END! 3013!X=682.8, 4863.11, 127.5, 0.000!!END! 3014!X=683.3, 4863.11, 116.62, 0.000!!END! 3015!X=683.8, 4863.11, 118.44, 0.000!!END! 3016!X=684.3, 4863.11, 104.7, 0.000!!END! 3017!X=684.8, 4863.11, 88.37, 0.000!!END! 3018!X=685.3, 4863.11, 94.51, 0.000!!END! 3019!X=685.8, 4863.11, 81.69, 0.000!!END! 3020!X=675.3, 4863.61, 132.56, 0.000!!END! 3021!X=675.8, 4863.61, 130.49, 0.000!!END! 3022!X=676.3, 4863.61, 119.83, 0.000!!END! 3023!X=676.8, 4863.61, 126.55, 0.000!!END! 3024!X=677.3, 4863.61, 132.25, 0.000!!END! 3025!X=677.8, 4863.61, 132.99, 0.000!!END! 3026!X=678.3, 4863.61, 138.31, 0.000!!END! 3027!X=678.8, 4863.61, 134.69, 0.000!!END! 3028!X=679.3, 4863.61, 131.84, 0.000!!END! 3029!X=679.8, 4863.61, 131.33, 0.000!!END! 3030!X=680.3, 4863.61, 127.24, 0.000!!END! 3031!X=680.8, 4863.61, 124.73, 0.000!!END! 3032!X=681.3, 4863.61, 122.84, 0.000!!END! 3033!X=681.8, 4863.61, 126.13, 0.000!!END! 3034!X=682.3, 4863.61, 123.21, 0.000!!END! 3035!X=682.8, 4863.61, 126.94, 0.000!!END! 3036!X=683.3, 4863.61, 121.01, 0.000!!END! 3037!X=683.8, 4863.61, 119.66, 0.000!!END! 3038!X=684.3, 4863.61, 108.97, 0.000!!END! 3039!X=684.8, 4863.61, 116.49, 0.000!!END! 3040!X=685.3, 4863.61, 92.09, 0.000!!END! 3041!X=685.8, 4863.61, 80.93, 0.000!!END! 3042!X=675.3, 4864.11, 124.36, 0.000!!END! 3043!X=675.8, 4864.11, 135.14, 0.000!!END! 3044!X=676.3, 4864.11, 135.49, 0.000!!END! 3045!X=676.8, 4864.11, 131.36, 0.000!!END! 3046!X=677.3, 4864.11, 135.3, 0.000!!END! 3047!X=677.8, 4864.11, 137.35, 0.000!!END! 3048!X=678.3, 4864.11, 137.97, 0.000!!END! 3049!X=678.8, 4864.11, 134.03, 0.000!!END! 3050!X=679.3, 4864.11, 134.5, 0.000!!END! 3051!X=679.8, 4864.11, 136.74, 0.000!!END! 3052!X=680.3, 4864.11, 133.99, 0.000!!END! 3053!X=680.8, 4864.11, 136.04, 0.000!!END! 3054!X=681.3, 4864.11, 133.9, 0.000!!END! 3055!X=681.8, 4864.11, 132.81, 0.000!!END! 3056!X=682.3, 4864.11, 130.39, 0.000!!END! 3057!X=682.8, 4864.11, 122.86, 0.000!!END! 3058!X=683.3, 4864.11, 125.22, 0.000!!END! 3059!X=683.8, 4864.11, 119.66, 0.000!!END! 3060!X=684.3, 4864.11, 116.2, 0.000!!END! 3061!X=684.8, 4864.11, 114.5, 0.000!!END! 3062!X=685.3, 4864.11, 101.41, 0.000!!END! 3063!X=685.8, 4864.11, 87.37, 0.000!!END! 3064!X=675.3, 4864.61, 138.21, 0.000!!END! 3065!X=675.8, 4864.61, 136.95, 0.000!!END! 3066!X=676.3, 4864.61, 137.78, 0.000!!END! 3067!X=676.8, 4864.61, 133.64, 0.000!!END! Page 536 2. CALPUFF.INP 86 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3068!X=677.3, 4864.61, 133.16, 0.000!!END! 3069!X=677.8, 4864.61, 134.19, 0.000!!END! 3070!X=678.3, 4864.61, 135.64, 0.000!!END! 3071!X=678.8, 4864.61, 135.51, 0.000!!END! 3072!X=679.3, 4864.61, 136.63, 0.000!!END! 3073!X=679.8, 4864.61, 137.29, 0.000!!END! 3074!X=680.3, 4864.61, 141.35, 0.000!!END! 3075!X=680.8, 4864.61, 142.08, 0.000!!END! 3076!X=681.3, 4864.61, 138.4, 0.000!!END! 3077!X=681.8, 4864.61, 136.59, 0.000!!END! 3078!X=682.3, 4864.61, 131.87, 0.000!!END! 3079!X=682.8, 4864.61, 129.49, 0.000!!END! 3080!X=683.3, 4864.61, 124.49, 0.000!!END! 3081!X=683.8, 4864.61, 122.87, 0.000!!END! 3082!X=684.3, 4864.61, 120.68, 0.000!!END! 3083!X=684.8, 4864.61, 114.58, 0.000!!END! 3084!X=685.3, 4864.61, 97.77, 0.000!!END! 3085!X=685.8, 4864.61, 107.28, 0.000!!END! 3086!X=675.3, 4865.11, 140.43, 0.000!!END! 3087!X=675.8, 4865.11, 147.52, 0.000!!END! 3088!X=676.3, 4865.11, 138.51, 0.000!!END! 3089!X=676.8, 4865.11, 137.16, 0.000!!END! 3090!X=677.3, 4865.11, 133.03, 0.000!!END! 3091!X=677.8, 4865.11, 141.45, 0.000!!END! 3092!X=678.3, 4865.11, 139.12, 0.000!!END! 3093!X=678.8, 4865.11, 139.59, 0.000!!END! 3094!X=679.3, 4865.11, 141.43, 0.000!!END! 3095!X=679.8, 4865.11, 144.09, 0.000!!END! 3096!X=680.3, 4865.11, 147.39, 0.000!!END! 3097!X=680.8, 4865.11, 146.89, 0.000!!END! 3098!X=681.3, 4865.11, 150.31, 0.000!!END! 3099!X=681.8, 4865.11, 140.71, 0.000!!END! 3100!X=682.3, 4865.11, 146.78, 0.000!!END! 3101!X=682.8, 4865.11, 136.25, 0.000!!END! 3102!X=683.3, 4865.11, 128.18, 0.000!!END! 3103!X=683.8, 4865.11, 123.65, 0.000!!END! 3104!X=684.3, 4865.11, 117.68, 0.000!!END! 3105!X=684.8, 4865.11, 115.27, 0.000!!END! 3106!X=685.3, 4865.11, 118.73, 0.000!!END! 3107!X=685.8, 4865.11, 110.81, 0.000!!END! 3108!X=675.3, 4865.61, 145.69, 0.000!!END! 3109!X=675.8, 4865.61, 143.59, 0.000!!END! 3110!X=676.3, 4865.61, 144.82, 0.000!!END! 3111!X=676.8, 4865.61, 138.96, 0.000!!END! 3112!X=677.3, 4865.61, 140.22, 0.000!!END! 3113!X=677.8, 4865.61, 145.09, 0.000!!END! 3114!X=678.3, 4865.61, 143.86, 0.000!!END! 3115!X=678.8, 4865.61, 145.85, 0.000!!END! 3116!X=679.3, 4865.61, 147.63, 0.000!!END! 3117!X=679.8, 4865.61, 144.97, 0.000!!END! 3118!X=680.3, 4865.61, 153.17, 0.000!!END! 3119!X=680.8, 4865.61, 151.95, 0.000!!END! 3120!X=681.3, 4865.61, 148.02, 0.000!!END! 3121!X=681.8, 4865.61, 153.14, 0.000!!END! 3122!X=682.3, 4865.61, 154.3, 0.000!!END! 3123!X=682.8, 4865.61, 144.67, 0.000!!END! 3124!X=683.3, 4865.61, 137.33, 0.000!!END! 3125!X=683.8, 4865.61, 136.76, 0.000!!END! 3126!X=684.3, 4865.61, 123.02, 0.000!!END! 3127!X=684.8, 4865.61, 122.33, 0.000!!END! 3128!X=685.3, 4865.61, 124.7, 0.000!!END! 3129!X=685.8, 4865.61, 110.21, 0.000!!END! 3130!X=662.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3131!X=663.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3132!X=664.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3133!X=665.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 537 2. CALPUFF.INP 87 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3134!X=666.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3135!X=667.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3136!X=668.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3137!X=669.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3138!X=670.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3139!X=671.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3140!X=672.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3141!X=673.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3142!X=674.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3143!X=675.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3144!X=676.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3145!X=677.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3146!X=678.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3147!X=679.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3148!X=680.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3149!X=681.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3150!X=682.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3151!X=683.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3152!X=684.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3153!X=685.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3154!X=686.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3155!X=687.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3156!X=688.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3157!X=689.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3158!X=690.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3159!X=691.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3160!X=692.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3161!X=693.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3162!X=694.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3163!X=695.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3164!X=696.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3165!X=697.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3166!X=698.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3167!X=699.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3168!X=700.55, 4850.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3169!X=662.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3170!X=663.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3171!X=664.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3172!X=665.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3173!X=666.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3174!X=667.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3175!X=668.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3176!X=669.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3177!X=670.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3178!X=671.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3179!X=672.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3180!X=673.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3181!X=674.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3182!X=675.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3183!X=676.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3184!X=677.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3185!X=678.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3186!X=679.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3187!X=680.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3188!X=681.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3189!X=682.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3190!X=683.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3191!X=684.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3192!X=685.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3193!X=686.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3194!X=687.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3195!X=688.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3196!X=689.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3197!X=690.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3198!X=691.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3199!X=692.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 538 2. CALPUFF.INP 88 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3200!X=693.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3201!X=694.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3202!X=695.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3203!X=696.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3204!X=697.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3205!X=698.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3206!X=699.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3207!X=700.55, 4851.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3208!X=662.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3209!X=663.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3210!X=664.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3211!X=665.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3212!X=666.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3213!X=667.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3214!X=668.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3215!X=669.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3216!X=670.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3217!X=671.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3218!X=672.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3219!X=673.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3220!X=674.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3221!X=675.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3222!X=676.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3223!X=677.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3224!X=678.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3225!X=679.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3226!X=680.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3227!X=681.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3228!X=682.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3229!X=683.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3230!X=684.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3231!X=685.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3232!X=686.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3233!X=687.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3234!X=688.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3235!X=689.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3236!X=690.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3237!X=691.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3238!X=692.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3239!X=693.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3240!X=694.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3241!X=695.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3242!X=696.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3243!X=697.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3244!X=698.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3245!X=699.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3246!X=700.55, 4852.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3247!X=662.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3248!X=663.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3249!X=664.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3250!X=665.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3251!X=666.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3252!X=667.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3253!X=668.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3254!X=669.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3255!X=670.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3256!X=671.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3257!X=672.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3258!X=673.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3259!X=674.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3260!X=675.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3261!X=676.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3262!X=677.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3263!X=678.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3264!X=679.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3265!X=680.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 539 2. CALPUFF.INP 89 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3266!X=681.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3267!X=682.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3268!X=683.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3269!X=684.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3270!X=685.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3271!X=686.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3272!X=687.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3273!X=688.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3274!X=689.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3275!X=690.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3276!X=691.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3277!X=692.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3278!X=693.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3279!X=694.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3280!X=695.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3281!X=696.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3282!X=697.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3283!X=698.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3284!X=699.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3285!X=700.55, 4853.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3286!X=662.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3287!X=663.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3288!X=664.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3289!X=665.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3290!X=666.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3291!X=667.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3292!X=668.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3293!X=669.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3294!X=670.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3295!X=671.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3296!X=672.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3297!X=673.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3298!X=674.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3299!X=675.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3300!X=676.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3301!X=677.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3302!X=678.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3303!X=679.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3304!X=680.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3305!X=681.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3306!X=682.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3307!X=683.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3308!X=684.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3309!X=685.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3310!X=686.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3311!X=687.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3312!X=688.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3313!X=689.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3314!X=690.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3315!X=691.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3316!X=692.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3317!X=693.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3318!X=694.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3319!X=695.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3320!X=696.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3321!X=697.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3322!X=698.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3323!X=699.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3324!X=700.55, 4854.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3325!X=662.55, 4855.36, 81, 0.000!!END! 3326!X=663.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3327!X=664.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3328!X=665.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3329!X=666.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3330!X=667.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3331!X=668.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 540 2. CALPUFF.INP 90 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3332!X=669.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3333!X=670.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3334!X=671.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3335!X=672.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3336!X=673.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3337!X=674.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3338!X=686.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3339!X=687.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3340!X=688.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3341!X=689.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3342!X=690.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3343!X=691.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3344!X=692.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3345!X=693.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3346!X=694.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3347!X=695.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3348!X=696.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3349!X=697.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3350!X=698.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3351!X=699.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3352!X=700.55, 4855.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3353!X=662.55, 4856.36, 82.15, 0.000!!END! 3354!X=663.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3355!X=664.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3356!X=665.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3357!X=666.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3358!X=667.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3359!X=668.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3360!X=669.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3361!X=670.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3362!X=671.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3363!X=672.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3364!X=673.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3365!X=674.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3366!X=686.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3367!X=687.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3368!X=688.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3369!X=689.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3370!X=690.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3371!X=691.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3372!X=692.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3373!X=693.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3374!X=694.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3375!X=695.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3376!X=696.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3377!X=697.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3378!X=698.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3379!X=699.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3380!X=700.55, 4856.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3381!X=662.55, 4857.36, 84.31, 0.000!!END! 3382!X=663.55, 4857.36, 79.12, 0.000!!END! 3383!X=664.55, 4857.36, 83.17, 0.000!!END! 3384!X=665.55, 4857.36, 82.37, 0.000!!END! 3385!X=666.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3386!X=667.55, 4857.36, 82.05, 0.000!!END! 3387!X=668.55, 4857.36, 83.35, 0.000!!END! 3388!X=669.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3389!X=670.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3390!X=671.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3391!X=672.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3392!X=673.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3393!X=674.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3394!X=686.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3395!X=687.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3396!X=688.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3397!X=689.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 541 2. CALPUFF.INP 91 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3398!X=690.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3399!X=691.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3400!X=692.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3401!X=693.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3402!X=694.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3403!X=695.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3404!X=696.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3405!X=697.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3406!X=698.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3407!X=699.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3408!X=700.55, 4857.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3409!X=662.55, 4858.36, 81.66, 0.000!!END! 3410!X=663.55, 4858.36, 80.57, 0.000!!END! 3411!X=664.55, 4858.36, 80.3, 0.000!!END! 3412!X=665.55, 4858.36, 77.7, 0.000!!END! 3413!X=666.55, 4858.36, 79.49, 0.000!!END! 3414!X=667.55, 4858.36, 84.88, 0.000!!END! 3415!X=668.55, 4858.36, 91.61, 0.000!!END! 3416!X=669.55, 4858.36, 79.02, 0.000!!END! 3417!X=670.55, 4858.36, 88.59, 0.000!!END! 3418!X=671.55, 4858.36, 87.61, 0.000!!END! 3419!X=672.55, 4858.36, 96, 0.000!!END! 3420!X=673.55, 4858.36, 74.8, 0.000!!END! 3421!X=674.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3422!X=686.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3423!X=687.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3424!X=688.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3425!X=689.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3426!X=690.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3427!X=691.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3428!X=692.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3429!X=693.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3430!X=694.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3431!X=695.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3432!X=696.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3433!X=697.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3434!X=698.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3435!X=699.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3436!X=700.55, 4858.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3437!X=662.55, 4859.36, 86.7, 0.000!!END! 3438!X=663.55, 4859.36, 79.08, 0.000!!END! 3439!X=664.55, 4859.36, 84.07, 0.000!!END! 3440!X=665.55, 4859.36, 91.27, 0.000!!END! 3441!X=666.55, 4859.36, 84.13, 0.000!!END! 3442!X=667.55, 4859.36, 96.24, 0.000!!END! 3443!X=668.55, 4859.36, 97.47, 0.000!!END! 3444!X=669.55, 4859.36, 92.26, 0.000!!END! 3445!X=670.55, 4859.36, 106.2, 0.000!!END! 3446!X=671.55, 4859.36, 106.57, 0.000!!END! 3447!X=672.55, 4859.36, 100.46, 0.000!!END! 3448!X=673.55, 4859.36, 86.02, 0.000!!END! 3449!X=674.55, 4859.36, 74.07, 0.000!!END! 3450!X=686.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3451!X=687.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3452!X=688.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3453!X=689.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3454!X=690.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3455!X=691.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3456!X=692.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3457!X=693.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3458!X=694.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3459!X=695.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3460!X=696.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3461!X=697.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3462!X=698.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3463!X=699.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! Page 542 2. CALPUFF.INP 92 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3464!X=700.55, 4859.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3465!X=662.55, 4860.36, 92.18, 0.000!!END! 3466!X=663.55, 4860.36, 85.15, 0.000!!END! 3467!X=664.55, 4860.36, 95.28, 0.000!!END! 3468!X=665.55, 4860.36, 94.98, 0.000!!END! 3469!X=666.55, 4860.36, 89.07, 0.000!!END! 3470!X=667.55, 4860.36, 85.72, 0.000!!END! 3471!X=668.55, 4860.36, 99.95, 0.000!!END! 3472!X=669.55, 4860.36, 96.59, 0.000!!END! 3473!X=670.55, 4860.36, 105.75, 0.000!!END! 3474!X=671.55, 4860.36, 105.16, 0.000!!END! 3475!X=672.55, 4860.36, 95.58, 0.000!!END! 3476!X=673.55, 4860.36, 104.31, 0.000!!END! 3477!X=674.55, 4860.36, 84.82, 0.000!!END! 3478!X=686.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3479!X=687.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3480!X=688.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3481!X=689.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3482!X=690.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3483!X=691.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3484!X=692.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3485!X=693.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3486!X=694.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3487!X=695.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3488!X=696.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3489!X=697.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3490!X=698.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3491!X=699.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3492!X=700.55, 4860.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3493!X=662.55, 4861.36, 102.26, 0.000!!END! 3494!X=663.55, 4861.36, 97.06, 0.000!!END! 3495!X=664.55, 4861.36, 96.49, 0.000!!END! 3496!X=665.55, 4861.36, 91.84, 0.000!!END! 3497!X=666.55, 4861.36, 96.5, 0.000!!END! 3498!X=667.55, 4861.36, 113.47, 0.000!!END! 3499!X=668.55, 4861.36, 125.62, 0.000!!END! 3500!X=669.55, 4861.36, 106.72, 0.000!!END! 3501!X=670.55, 4861.36, 102.38, 0.000!!END! 3502!X=671.55, 4861.36, 100.71, 0.000!!END! 3503!X=672.55, 4861.36, 98.49, 0.000!!END! 3504!X=673.55, 4861.36, 98.91, 0.000!!END! 3505!X=674.55, 4861.36, 81.86, 0.000!!END! 3506!X=686.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3507!X=687.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3508!X=688.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3509!X=689.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3510!X=690.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3511!X=691.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3512!X=692.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3513!X=693.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3514!X=694.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3515!X=695.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3516!X=696.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3517!X=697.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3518!X=698.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3519!X=699.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3520!X=700.55, 4861.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3521!X=662.55, 4862.36, 103.51, 0.000!!END! 3522!X=663.55, 4862.36, 95.48, 0.000!!END! 3523!X=664.55, 4862.36, 101.33, 0.000!!END! 3524!X=665.55, 4862.36, 107.4, 0.000!!END! 3525!X=666.55, 4862.36, 103.68, 0.000!!END! 3526!X=667.55, 4862.36, 131.44, 0.000!!END! 3527!X=668.55, 4862.36, 106.09, 0.000!!END! 3528!X=669.55, 4862.36, 109.87, 0.000!!END! 3529!X=670.55, 4862.36, 116.32, 0.000!!END! Page 543 2. CALPUFF.INP 93 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3530!X=671.55, 4862.36, 108.15, 0.000!!END! 3531!X=672.55, 4862.36, 105.86, 0.000!!END! 3532!X=673.55, 4862.36, 94.28, 0.000!!END! 3533!X=674.55, 4862.36, 88.01, 0.000!!END! 3534!X=686.55, 4862.36, 78.82, 0.000!!END! 3535!X=687.55, 4862.36, 76.06, 0.000!!END! 3536!X=688.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3537!X=689.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3538!X=690.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3539!X=691.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3540!X=692.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3541!X=693.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3542!X=694.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3543!X=695.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3544!X=696.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3545!X=697.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3546!X=698.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3547!X=699.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3548!X=700.55, 4862.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3549!X=662.55, 4863.36, 114.99, 0.000!!END! 3550!X=663.55, 4863.36, 108.99, 0.000!!END! 3551!X=664.55, 4863.36, 131.79, 0.000!!END! 3552!X=665.55, 4863.36, 112.01, 0.000!!END! 3553!X=666.55, 4863.36, 112.77, 0.000!!END! 3554!X=667.55, 4863.36, 123.78, 0.000!!END! 3555!X=668.55, 4863.36, 133.55, 0.000!!END! 3556!X=669.55, 4863.36, 131.17, 0.000!!END! 3557!X=670.55, 4863.36, 110.16, 0.000!!END! 3558!X=671.55, 4863.36, 125.01, 0.000!!END! 3559!X=672.55, 4863.36, 110.61, 0.000!!END! 3560!X=673.55, 4863.36, 98.19, 0.000!!END! 3561!X=674.55, 4863.36, 98.03, 0.000!!END! 3562!X=686.55, 4863.36, 84, 0.000!!END! 3563!X=687.55, 4863.36, 86.16, 0.000!!END! 3564!X=688.55, 4863.36, 87.35, 0.000!!END! 3565!X=689.55, 4863.36, 96.06, 0.000!!END! 3566!X=690.55, 4863.36, 87.88, 0.000!!END! 3567!X=691.55, 4863.36, 73.56, 0.000!!END! 3568!X=692.55, 4863.36, 82.22, 0.000!!END! 3569!X=693.55, 4863.36, 83.49, 0.000!!END! 3570!X=694.55, 4863.36, 77.24, 0.000!!END! 3571!X=695.55, 4863.36, 102.06, 0.000!!END! 3572!X=696.55, 4863.36, 100.48, 0.000!!END! 3573!X=697.55, 4863.36, 96.07, 0.000!!END! 3574!X=698.55, 4863.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3575!X=699.55, 4863.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3576!X=700.55, 4863.36, 73, 0.000!!END! 3577!X=662.55, 4864.36, 117.61, 0.000!!END! 3578!X=663.55, 4864.36, 122.3, 0.000!!END! 3579!X=664.55, 4864.36, 133.09, 0.000!!END! 3580!X=665.55, 4864.36, 119.97, 0.000!!END! 3581!X=666.55, 4864.36, 117.96, 0.000!!END! 3582!X=667.55, 4864.36, 126.14, 0.000!!END! 3583!X=668.55, 4864.36, 121.46, 0.000!!END! 3584!X=669.55, 4864.36, 135.65, 0.000!!END! 3585!X=670.55, 4864.36, 126.96, 0.000!!END! 3586!X=671.55, 4864.36, 119.05, 0.000!!END! 3587!X=672.55, 4864.36, 109.57, 0.000!!END! 3588!X=673.55, 4864.36, 108.8, 0.000!!END! 3589!X=674.55, 4864.36, 127.97, 0.000!!END! 3590!X=686.55, 4864.36, 95.2, 0.000!!END! 3591!X=687.55, 4864.36, 88.47, 0.000!!END! 3592!X=688.55, 4864.36, 96, 0.000!!END! 3593!X=689.55, 4864.36, 119.33, 0.000!!END! 3594!X=690.55, 4864.36, 103.28, 0.000!!END! 3595!X=691.55, 4864.36, 94.05, 0.000!!END! Page 544 2. CALPUFF.INP 94 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3596!X=692.55, 4864.36, 82.77, 0.000!!END! 3597!X=693.55, 4864.36, 89.79, 0.000!!END! 3598!X=694.55, 4864.36, 99.88, 0.000!!END! 3599!X=695.55, 4864.36, 103.91, 0.000!!END! 3600!X=696.55, 4864.36, 121.31, 0.000!!END! 3601!X=697.55, 4864.36, 132.88, 0.000!!END! 3602!X=698.55, 4864.36, 132.06, 0.000!!END! 3603!X=699.55, 4864.36, 131.33, 0.000!!END! 3604!X=700.55, 4864.36, 120.97, 0.000!!END! 3605!X=662.55, 4865.36, 143.72, 0.000!!END! 3606!X=663.55, 4865.36, 134.62, 0.000!!END! 3607!X=664.55, 4865.36, 139.58, 0.000!!END! 3608!X=665.55, 4865.36, 137.45, 0.000!!END! 3609!X=666.55, 4865.36, 137.71, 0.000!!END! 3610!X=667.55, 4865.36, 137.65, 0.000!!END! 3611!X=668.55, 4865.36, 135.36, 0.000!!END! 3612!X=669.55, 4865.36, 135.1, 0.000!!END! 3613!X=670.55, 4865.36, 136.81, 0.000!!END! 3614!X=671.55, 4865.36, 120.05, 0.000!!END! 3615!X=672.55, 4865.36, 117.38, 0.000!!END! 3616!X=673.55, 4865.36, 122.26, 0.000!!END! 3617!X=674.55, 4865.36, 138.99, 0.000!!END! 3618!X=686.55, 4865.36, 89.06, 0.000!!END! 3619!X=687.55, 4865.36, 94.06, 0.000!!END! 3620!X=688.55, 4865.36, 96.74, 0.000!!END! 3621!X=689.55, 4865.36, 113.22, 0.000!!END! 3622!X=690.55, 4865.36, 112.02, 0.000!!END! 3623!X=691.55, 4865.36, 94.14, 0.000!!END! 3624!X=692.55, 4865.36, 96.48, 0.000!!END! 3625!X=693.55, 4865.36, 102.28, 0.000!!END! 3626!X=694.55, 4865.36, 91.54, 0.000!!END! 3627!X=695.55, 4865.36, 120.59, 0.000!!END! 3628!X=696.55, 4865.36, 144.23, 0.000!!END! 3629!X=697.55, 4865.36, 134.66, 0.000!!END! 3630!X=698.55, 4865.36, 138.49, 0.000!!END! 3631!X=699.55, 4865.36, 140.02, 0.000!!END! 3632!X=700.55, 4865.36, 137.87, 0.000!!END! 3633!X=662.55, 4866.36, 146.91, 0.000!!END! 3634!X=663.55, 4866.36, 142.4, 0.000!!END! 3635!X=664.55, 4866.36, 146.81, 0.000!!END! 3636!X=665.55, 4866.36, 147.09, 0.000!!END! 3637!X=666.55, 4866.36, 151.76, 0.000!!END! 3638!X=667.55, 4866.36, 143.3, 0.000!!END! 3639!X=668.55, 4866.36, 143.22, 0.000!!END! 3640!X=669.55, 4866.36, 141.09, 0.000!!END! 3641!X=670.55, 4866.36, 142.35, 0.000!!END! 3642!X=671.55, 4866.36, 144.47, 0.000!!END! 3643!X=672.55, 4866.36, 143.15, 0.000!!END! 3644!X=673.55, 4866.36, 150.06, 0.000!!END! 3645!X=674.55, 4866.36, 151.65, 0.000!!END! 3646!X=675.55, 4866.36, 152.42, 0.000!!END! 3647!X=676.55, 4866.36, 146.63, 0.000!!END! 3648!X=677.55, 4866.36, 149.89, 0.000!!END! 3649!X=678.55, 4866.36, 151.54, 0.000!!END! 3650!X=679.55, 4866.36, 152.96, 0.000!!END! 3651!X=680.55, 4866.36, 153.36, 0.000!!END! 3652!X=681.55, 4866.36, 157.64, 0.000!!END! 3653!X=682.55, 4866.36, 155.99, 0.000!!END! 3654!X=683.55, 4866.36, 143, 0.000!!END! 3655!X=684.55, 4866.36, 130.2, 0.000!!END! 3656!X=685.55, 4866.36, 126.28, 0.000!!END! 3657!X=686.55, 4866.36, 0, 0.000!!END! 3658!X=687.55, 4866.36, 104.26, 0.000!!END! 3659!X=688.55, 4866.36, 100.71, 0.000!!END! 3660!X=689.55, 4866.36, 117.74, 0.000!!END! 3661!X=690.55, 4866.36, 108.54, 0.000!!END! Page 545 2. CALPUFF.INP 95 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3662!X=691.55, 4866.36, 102.74, 0.000!!END! 3663!X=692.55, 4866.36, 101.34, 0.000!!END! 3664!X=693.55, 4866.36, 113.33, 0.000!!END! 3665!X=694.55, 4866.36, 124.95, 0.000!!END! 3666!X=695.55, 4866.36, 131.81, 0.000!!END! 3667!X=696.55, 4866.36, 138.29, 0.000!!END! 3668!X=697.55, 4866.36, 152.01, 0.000!!END! 3669!X=698.55, 4866.36, 146.7, 0.000!!END! 3670!X=699.55, 4866.36, 148.76, 0.000!!END! 3671!X=700.55, 4866.36, 162.68, 0.000!!END! 3672!X=662.55, 4867.36, 157.04, 0.000!!END! 3673!X=663.55, 4867.36, 158.53, 0.000!!END! 3674!X=664.55, 4867.36, 149.54, 0.000!!END! 3675!X=665.55, 4867.36, 151.1, 0.000!!END! 3676!X=666.55, 4867.36, 152.75, 0.000!!END! 3677!X=667.55, 4867.36, 155.44, 0.000!!END! 3678!X=668.55, 4867.36, 143.52, 0.000!!END! 3679!X=669.55, 4867.36, 148, 0.000!!END! 3680!X=670.55, 4867.36, 148.41, 0.000!!END! 3681!X=671.55, 4867.36, 162.08, 0.000!!END! 3682!X=672.55, 4867.36, 180.91, 0.000!!END! 3683!X=673.55, 4867.36, 176.99, 0.000!!END! 3684!X=674.55, 4867.36, 167.03, 0.000!!END! 3685!X=675.55, 4867.36, 158.99, 0.000!!END! 3686!X=676.55, 4867.36, 174.89, 0.000!!END! 3687!X=677.55, 4867.36, 152.69, 0.000!!END! 3688!X=678.55, 4867.36, 160.62, 0.000!!END! 3689!X=679.55, 4867.36, 160.6, 0.000!!END! 3690!X=680.55, 4867.36, 155.5, 0.000!!END! 3691!X=681.55, 4867.36, 153.03, 0.000!!END! 3692!X=682.55, 4867.36, 165.74, 0.000!!END! 3693!X=683.55, 4867.36, 150.48, 0.000!!END! 3694!X=684.55, 4867.36, 143.58, 0.000!!END! 3695!X=685.55, 4867.36, 128.88, 0.000!!END! 3696!X=686.55, 4867.36, 101.86, 0.000!!END! 3697!X=687.55, 4867.36, 112.12, 0.000!!END! 3698!X=688.55, 4867.36, 107.41, 0.000!!END! 3699!X=689.55, 4867.36, 107.95, 0.000!!END! 3700!X=690.55, 4867.36, 118.8, 0.000!!END! 3701!X=691.55, 4867.36, 113.74, 0.000!!END! 3702!X=692.55, 4867.36, 112.91, 0.000!!END! 3703!X=693.55, 4867.36, 136.96, 0.000!!END! 3704!X=694.55, 4867.36, 139.33, 0.000!!END! 3705!X=695.55, 4867.36, 118.11, 0.000!!END! 3706!X=696.55, 4867.36, 137.93, 0.000!!END! 3707!X=697.55, 4867.36, 155.97, 0.000!!END! 3708!X=698.55, 4867.36, 159.07, 0.000!!END! 3709!X=699.55, 4867.36, 160.58, 0.000!!END! 3710!X=700.55, 4867.36, 149.61, 0.000!!END! 3711!X=662.55, 4868.36, 166.98, 0.000!!END! 3712!X=663.55, 4868.36, 163.61, 0.000!!END! 3713!X=664.55, 4868.36, 157.73, 0.000!!END! 3714!X=665.55, 4868.36, 169.21, 0.000!!END! 3715!X=666.55, 4868.36, 161.25, 0.000!!END! 3716!X=667.55, 4868.36, 153.72, 0.000!!END! 3717!X=668.55, 4868.36, 152.49, 0.000!!END! 3718!X=669.55, 4868.36, 151.33, 0.000!!END! 3719!X=670.55, 4868.36, 153.11, 0.000!!END! 3720!X=671.55, 4868.36, 179.49, 0.000!!END! 3721!X=672.55, 4868.36, 185.27, 0.000!!END! 3722!X=673.55, 4868.36, 188.96, 0.000!!END! 3723!X=674.55, 4868.36, 181.33, 0.000!!END! 3724!X=675.55, 4868.36, 169.3, 0.000!!END! 3725!X=676.55, 4868.36, 194.83, 0.000!!END! 3726!X=677.55, 4868.36, 165.52, 0.000!!END! 3727!X=678.55, 4868.36, 161.1, 0.000!!END! Page 546 2. CALPUFF.INP 96 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3728!X=679.55, 4868.36, 152.37, 0.000!!END! 3729!X=680.55, 4868.36, 165.07, 0.000!!END! 3730!X=681.55, 4868.36, 162.71, 0.000!!END! 3731!X=682.55, 4868.36, 155.39, 0.000!!END! 3732!X=683.55, 4868.36, 155.46, 0.000!!END! 3733!X=684.55, 4868.36, 155.35, 0.000!!END! 3734!X=685.55, 4868.36, 132.84, 0.000!!END! 3735!X=686.55, 4868.36, 107.88, 0.000!!END! 3736!X=687.55, 4868.36, 125.88, 0.000!!END! 3737!X=688.55, 4868.36, 119.26, 0.000!!END! 3738!X=689.55, 4868.36, 114.75, 0.000!!END! 3739!X=690.55, 4868.36, 119.44, 0.000!!END! 3740!X=691.55, 4868.36, 116.19, 0.000!!END! 3741!X=692.55, 4868.36, 136.51, 0.000!!END! 3742!X=693.55, 4868.36, 132.12, 0.000!!END! 3743!X=694.55, 4868.36, 146.81, 0.000!!END! 3744!X=695.55, 4868.36, 147.79, 0.000!!END! 3745!X=696.55, 4868.36, 131.73, 0.000!!END! 3746!X=697.55, 4868.36, 153.87, 0.000!!END! 3747!X=698.55, 4868.36, 162.82, 0.000!!END! 3748!X=699.55, 4868.36, 167.35, 0.000!!END! 3749!X=700.55, 4868.36, 170.52, 0.000!!END! 3750!X=662.55, 4869.36, 174.22, 0.000!!END! 3751!X=663.55, 4869.36, 164.78, 0.000!!END! 3752!X=664.55, 4869.36, 169.56, 0.000!!END! 3753!X=665.55, 4869.36, 172.89, 0.000!!END! 3754!X=666.55, 4869.36, 159.05, 0.000!!END! 3755!X=667.55, 4869.36, 166.95, 0.000!!END! 3756!X=668.55, 4869.36, 174.21, 0.000!!END! 3757!X=669.55, 4869.36, 156.68, 0.000!!END! 3758!X=670.55, 4869.36, 163.86, 0.000!!END! 3759!X=671.55, 4869.36, 195.27, 0.000!!END! 3760!X=672.55, 4869.36, 192.75, 0.000!!END! 3761!X=673.55, 4869.36, 200.53, 0.000!!END! 3762!X=674.55, 4869.36, 188.52, 0.000!!END! 3763!X=675.55, 4869.36, 193.06, 0.000!!END! 3764!X=676.55, 4869.36, 198.45, 0.000!!END! 3765!X=677.55, 4869.36, 182.18, 0.000!!END! 3766!X=678.55, 4869.36, 166.3, 0.000!!END! 3767!X=679.55, 4869.36, 164.45, 0.000!!END! 3768!X=680.55, 4869.36, 155.69, 0.000!!END! 3769!X=681.55, 4869.36, 158.86, 0.000!!END! 3770!X=682.55, 4869.36, 160.39, 0.000!!END! 3771!X=683.55, 4869.36, 174.38, 0.000!!END! 3772!X=684.55, 4869.36, 160.01, 0.000!!END! 3773!X=685.55, 4869.36, 142.94, 0.000!!END! 3774!X=686.55, 4869.36, 120.19, 0.000!!END! 3775!X=687.55, 4869.36, 130.7, 0.000!!END! 3776!X=688.55, 4869.36, 127.36, 0.000!!END! 3777!X=689.55, 4869.36, 129.56, 0.000!!END! 3778!X=690.55, 4869.36, 120.9, 0.000!!END! 3779!X=691.55, 4869.36, 131.29, 0.000!!END! 3780!X=692.55, 4869.36, 136.31, 0.000!!END! 3781!X=693.55, 4869.36, 144.52, 0.000!!END! 3782!X=694.55, 4869.36, 154.28, 0.000!!END! 3783!X=695.55, 4869.36, 149.71, 0.000!!END! 3784!X=696.55, 4869.36, 140.28, 0.000!!END! 3785!X=697.55, 4869.36, 159.92, 0.000!!END! 3786!X=698.55, 4869.36, 171.67, 0.000!!END! 3787!X=699.55, 4869.36, 163.62, 0.000!!END! 3788!X=700.55, 4869.36, 157.91, 0.000!!END! 3789!X=662.55, 4870.36, 178.03, 0.000!!END! 3790!X=663.55, 4870.36, 174.95, 0.000!!END! 3791!X=664.55, 4870.36, 180.27, 0.000!!END! 3792!X=665.55, 4870.36, 177.8, 0.000!!END! 3793!X=666.55, 4870.36, 178.52, 0.000!!END! Page 547 2. CALPUFF.INP 97 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3794!X=667.55, 4870.36, 181.07, 0.000!!END! 3795!X=668.55, 4870.36, 189.33, 0.000!!END! 3796!X=669.55, 4870.36, 168.43, 0.000!!END! 3797!X=670.55, 4870.36, 194.21, 0.000!!END! 3798!X=671.55, 4870.36, 203.16, 0.000!!END! 3799!X=672.55, 4870.36, 212.4, 0.000!!END! 3800!X=673.55, 4870.36, 208.7, 0.000!!END! 3801!X=674.55, 4870.36, 210.69, 0.000!!END! 3802!X=675.55, 4870.36, 205.97, 0.000!!END! 3803!X=676.55, 4870.36, 211.87, 0.000!!END! 3804!X=677.55, 4870.36, 188.75, 0.000!!END! 3805!X=678.55, 4870.36, 178.13, 0.000!!END! 3806!X=679.55, 4870.36, 173.91, 0.000!!END! 3807!X=680.55, 4870.36, 167, 0.000!!END! 3808!X=681.55, 4870.36, 160.66, 0.000!!END! 3809!X=682.55, 4870.36, 168.94, 0.000!!END! 3810!X=683.55, 4870.36, 172.21, 0.000!!END! 3811!X=684.55, 4870.36, 175.79, 0.000!!END! 3812!X=685.55, 4870.36, 155.2, 0.000!!END! 3813!X=686.55, 4870.36, 137.33, 0.000!!END! 3814!X=687.55, 4870.36, 151.27, 0.000!!END! 3815!X=688.55, 4870.36, 157.14, 0.000!!END! 3816!X=689.55, 4870.36, 145.31, 0.000!!END! 3817!X=690.55, 4870.36, 130.06, 0.000!!END! 3818!X=691.55, 4870.36, 140.86, 0.000!!END! 3819!X=692.55, 4870.36, 147.59, 0.000!!END! 3820!X=693.55, 4870.36, 155, 0.000!!END! 3821!X=694.55, 4870.36, 164.71, 0.000!!END! 3822!X=695.55, 4870.36, 165.93, 0.000!!END! 3823!X=696.55, 4870.36, 154.86, 0.000!!END! 3824!X=697.55, 4870.36, 149.82, 0.000!!END! 3825!X=698.55, 4870.36, 161.84, 0.000!!END! 3826!X=699.55, 4870.36, 161.42, 0.000!!END! 3827!X=700.55, 4870.36, 176.32, 0.000!!END! 3828!X=662.55, 4871.36, 183.67, 0.000!!END! 3829!X=663.55, 4871.36, 203.09, 0.000!!END! 3830!X=664.55, 4871.36, 193.11, 0.000!!END! 3831!X=665.55, 4871.36, 194.9, 0.000!!END! 3832!X=666.55, 4871.36, 190.96, 0.000!!END! 3833!X=667.55, 4871.36, 191.98, 0.000!!END! 3834!X=668.55, 4871.36, 191.36, 0.000!!END! 3835!X=669.55, 4871.36, 180.48, 0.000!!END! 3836!X=670.55, 4871.36, 198.66, 0.000!!END! 3837!X=671.55, 4871.36, 231.29, 0.000!!END! 3838!X=672.55, 4871.36, 225.67, 0.000!!END! 3839!X=673.55, 4871.36, 224.62, 0.000!!END! 3840!X=674.55, 4871.36, 213.82, 0.000!!END! 3841!X=675.55, 4871.36, 209.38, 0.000!!END! 3842!X=676.55, 4871.36, 198.55, 0.000!!END! 3843!X=677.55, 4871.36, 198.41, 0.000!!END! 3844!X=678.55, 4871.36, 192.52, 0.000!!END! 3845!X=679.55, 4871.36, 186.38, 0.000!!END! 3846!X=680.55, 4871.36, 170.41, 0.000!!END! 3847!X=681.55, 4871.36, 162.5, 0.000!!END! 3848!X=682.55, 4871.36, 179.86, 0.000!!END! 3849!X=683.55, 4871.36, 167.15, 0.000!!END! 3850!X=684.55, 4871.36, 176.44, 0.000!!END! 3851!X=685.55, 4871.36, 162.96, 0.000!!END! 3852!X=686.55, 4871.36, 154.21, 0.000!!END! 3853!X=687.55, 4871.36, 161.36, 0.000!!END! 3854!X=688.55, 4871.36, 158.41, 0.000!!END! 3855!X=689.55, 4871.36, 154.59, 0.000!!END! 3856!X=690.55, 4871.36, 152.89, 0.000!!END! 3857!X=691.55, 4871.36, 148.52, 0.000!!END! 3858!X=692.55, 4871.36, 156.21, 0.000!!END! 3859!X=693.55, 4871.36, 177.09, 0.000!!END! Page 548 2. CALPUFF.INP 98 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3860!X=694.55, 4871.36, 228.04, 0.000!!END! 3861!X=695.55, 4871.36, 206.26, 0.000!!END! 3862!X=696.55, 4871.36, 164.09, 0.000!!END! 3863!X=697.55, 4871.36, 178.13, 0.000!!END! 3864!X=698.55, 4871.36, 157, 0.000!!END! 3865!X=699.55, 4871.36, 155.32, 0.000!!END! 3866!X=700.55, 4871.36, 172.41, 0.000!!END! 3867!X=662.55, 4872.36, 205.56, 0.000!!END! 3868!X=663.55, 4872.36, 213.33, 0.000!!END! 3869!X=664.55, 4872.36, 205.68, 0.000!!END! 3870!X=665.55, 4872.36, 209.24, 0.000!!END! 3871!X=666.55, 4872.36, 201.75, 0.000!!END! 3872!X=667.55, 4872.36, 197.46, 0.000!!END! 3873!X=668.55, 4872.36, 202.03, 0.000!!END! 3874!X=669.55, 4872.36, 202.98, 0.000!!END! 3875!X=670.55, 4872.36, 218.74, 0.000!!END! 3876!X=671.55, 4872.36, 253.94, 0.000!!END! 3877!X=672.55, 4872.36, 252.19, 0.000!!END! 3878!X=673.55, 4872.36, 248.96, 0.000!!END! 3879!X=674.55, 4872.36, 237.24, 0.000!!END! 3880!X=675.55, 4872.36, 234.1, 0.000!!END! 3881!X=676.55, 4872.36, 225.34, 0.000!!END! 3882!X=677.55, 4872.36, 207.46, 0.000!!END! 3883!X=678.55, 4872.36, 218.2, 0.000!!END! 3884!X=679.55, 4872.36, 183.36, 0.000!!END! 3885!X=680.55, 4872.36, 177.31, 0.000!!END! 3886!X=681.55, 4872.36, 178.08, 0.000!!END! 3887!X=682.55, 4872.36, 180.13, 0.000!!END! 3888!X=683.55, 4872.36, 188.04, 0.000!!END! 3889!X=684.55, 4872.36, 172.74, 0.000!!END! 3890!X=685.55, 4872.36, 162.71, 0.000!!END! 3891!X=686.55, 4872.36, 149.59, 0.000!!END! 3892!X=687.55, 4872.36, 173.77, 0.000!!END! 3893!X=688.55, 4872.36, 168.72, 0.000!!END! 3894!X=689.55, 4872.36, 174.92, 0.000!!END! 3895!X=690.55, 4872.36, 175.36, 0.000!!END! 3896!X=691.55, 4872.36, 168.75, 0.000!!END! 3897!X=692.55, 4872.36, 191.54, 0.000!!END! 3898!X=693.55, 4872.36, 200.84, 0.000!!END! 3899!X=694.55, 4872.36, 215.98, 0.000!!END! 3900!X=695.55, 4872.36, 222.28, 0.000!!END! 3901!X=696.55, 4872.36, 195.07, 0.000!!END! 3902!X=697.55, 4872.36, 168.34, 0.000!!END! 3903!X=698.55, 4872.36, 160.35, 0.000!!END! 3904!X=699.55, 4872.36, 164.63, 0.000!!END! 3905!X=700.55, 4872.36, 168.47, 0.000!!END! 3906!X=662.55, 4873.36, 228.14, 0.000!!END! 3907!X=663.55, 4873.36, 225.59, 0.000!!END! 3908!X=664.55, 4873.36, 215.46, 0.000!!END! 3909!X=665.55, 4873.36, 219.78, 0.000!!END! 3910!X=666.55, 4873.36, 217.28, 0.000!!END! 3911!X=667.55, 4873.36, 220.99, 0.000!!END! 3912!X=668.55, 4873.36, 217.38, 0.000!!END! 3913!X=669.55, 4873.36, 223.32, 0.000!!END! 3914!X=670.55, 4873.36, 223.77, 0.000!!END! 3915!X=671.55, 4873.36, 253.86, 0.000!!END! 3916!X=672.55, 4873.36, 256.48, 0.000!!END! 3917!X=673.55, 4873.36, 259.08, 0.000!!END! 3918!X=674.55, 4873.36, 259.59, 0.000!!END! 3919!X=675.55, 4873.36, 247.67, 0.000!!END! 3920!X=676.55, 4873.36, 254.47, 0.000!!END! 3921!X=677.55, 4873.36, 227.58, 0.000!!END! 3922!X=678.55, 4873.36, 214.15, 0.000!!END! 3923!X=679.55, 4873.36, 190, 0.000!!END! 3924!X=680.55, 4873.36, 183.36, 0.000!!END! 3925!X=681.55, 4873.36, 187.69, 0.000!!END! Page 549 2. CALPUFF.INP 99 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3926!X=682.55, 4873.36, 182.64, 0.000!!END! 3927!X=683.55, 4873.36, 184.69, 0.000!!END! 3928!X=684.55, 4873.36, 186.63, 0.000!!END! 3929!X=685.55, 4873.36, 189.05, 0.000!!END! 3930!X=686.55, 4873.36, 161.66, 0.000!!END! 3931!X=687.55, 4873.36, 186, 0.000!!END! 3932!X=688.55, 4873.36, 171.09, 0.000!!END! 3933!X=689.55, 4873.36, 184.46, 0.000!!END! 3934!X=690.55, 4873.36, 186.22, 0.000!!END! 3935!X=691.55, 4873.36, 189.91, 0.000!!END! 3936!X=692.55, 4873.36, 201.85, 0.000!!END! 3937!X=693.55, 4873.36, 227.99, 0.000!!END! 3938!X=694.55, 4873.36, 243.59, 0.000!!END! 3939!X=695.55, 4873.36, 219.25, 0.000!!END! 3940!X=696.55, 4873.36, 250.03, 0.000!!END! 3941!X=697.55, 4873.36, 173.22, 0.000!!END! 3942!X=698.55, 4873.36, 161.43, 0.000!!END! 3943!X=699.55, 4873.36, 159.02, 0.000!!END! 3944!X=700.55, 4873.36, 164.02, 0.000!!END! 3945!X=662.55, 4874.36, 243.45, 0.000!!END! 3946!X=663.55, 4874.36, 236.95, 0.000!!END! 3947!X=664.55, 4874.36, 234.42, 0.000!!END! 3948!X=665.55, 4874.36, 224.3, 0.000!!END! 3949!X=666.55, 4874.36, 229.05, 0.000!!END! 3950!X=667.55, 4874.36, 232.34, 0.000!!END! 3951!X=668.55, 4874.36, 231.05, 0.000!!END! 3952!X=669.55, 4874.36, 233.33, 0.000!!END! 3953!X=670.55, 4874.36, 246.94, 0.000!!END! 3954!X=671.55, 4874.36, 270.37, 0.000!!END! 3955!X=672.55, 4874.36, 264, 0.000!!END! 3956!X=673.55, 4874.36, 270.52, 0.000!!END! 3957!X=674.55, 4874.36, 269.5, 0.000!!END! 3958!X=675.55, 4874.36, 272.32, 0.000!!END! 3959!X=676.55, 4874.36, 265.89, 0.000!!END! 3960!X=677.55, 4874.36, 254.17, 0.000!!END! 3961!X=678.55, 4874.36, 205.38, 0.000!!END! 3962!X=679.55, 4874.36, 200.42, 0.000!!END! 3963!X=680.55, 4874.36, 195.53, 0.000!!END! 3964!X=681.55, 4874.36, 194.34, 0.000!!END! 3965!X=682.55, 4874.36, 197.63, 0.000!!END! 3966!X=683.55, 4874.36, 202.61, 0.000!!END! 3967!X=684.55, 4874.36, 200.65, 0.000!!END! 3968!X=685.55, 4874.36, 194.37, 0.000!!END! 3969!X=686.55, 4874.36, 171.76, 0.000!!END! 3970!X=687.55, 4874.36, 193.19, 0.000!!END! 3971!X=688.55, 4874.36, 180.26, 0.000!!END! 3972!X=689.55, 4874.36, 199.01, 0.000!!END! 3973!X=690.55, 4874.36, 197.25, 0.000!!END! 3974!X=691.55, 4874.36, 212.26, 0.000!!END! 3975!X=692.55, 4874.36, 226.47, 0.000!!END! 3976!X=693.55, 4874.36, 261.33, 0.000!!END! 3977!X=694.55, 4874.36, 249.32, 0.000!!END! 3978!X=695.55, 4874.36, 264.24, 0.000!!END! 3979!X=696.55, 4874.36, 246.9, 0.000!!END! 3980!X=697.55, 4874.36, 232.65, 0.000!!END! 3981!X=698.55, 4874.36, 175.54, 0.000!!END! 3982!X=699.55, 4874.36, 184.96, 0.000!!END! 3983!X=700.55, 4874.36, 177.19, 0.000!!END! 3984!X=662.55, 4875.36, 264.53, 0.000!!END! 3985!X=663.55, 4875.36, 252.74, 0.000!!END! 3986!X=664.55, 4875.36, 255.66, 0.000!!END! 3987!X=665.55, 4875.36, 239.56, 0.000!!END! 3988!X=666.55, 4875.36, 243.09, 0.000!!END! 3989!X=667.55, 4875.36, 245.12, 0.000!!END! 3990!X=668.55, 4875.36, 246.01, 0.000!!END! 3991!X=669.55, 4875.36, 235.71, 0.000!!END! Page 550 2. CALPUFF.INP 100 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 3992!X=670.55, 4875.36, 259.03, 0.000!!END! 3993!X=671.55, 4875.36, 275.64, 0.000!!END! 3994!X=672.55, 4875.36, 283.83, 0.000!!END! 3995!X=673.55, 4875.36, 274, 0.000!!END! 3996!X=674.55, 4875.36, 273, 0.000!!END! 3997!X=675.55, 4875.36, 280.69, 0.000!!END! 3998!X=676.55, 4875.36, 267.55, 0.000!!END! 3999!X=677.55, 4875.36, 218.29, 0.000!!END! 4000!X=678.55, 4875.36, 218.04, 0.000!!END! 4001!X=679.55, 4875.36, 229.35, 0.000!!END! 4002!X=680.55, 4875.36, 206.62, 0.000!!END! 4003!X=681.55, 4875.36, 203.95, 0.000!!END! 4004!X=682.55, 4875.36, 206.25, 0.000!!END! 4005!X=683.55, 4875.36, 212.63, 0.000!!END! 4006!X=684.55, 4875.36, 208.14, 0.000!!END! 4007!X=685.55, 4875.36, 190.18, 0.000!!END! 4008!X=686.55, 4875.36, 200.07, 0.000!!END! 4009!X=687.55, 4875.36, 223.16, 0.000!!END! 4010!X=688.55, 4875.36, 191.13, 0.000!!END! 4011!X=689.55, 4875.36, 219.23, 0.000!!END! 4012!X=690.55, 4875.36, 210.25, 0.000!!END! 4013!X=691.55, 4875.36, 230.18, 0.000!!END! 4014!X=692.55, 4875.36, 241.32, 0.000!!END! 4015!X=693.55, 4875.36, 269.81, 0.000!!END! 4016!X=694.55, 4875.36, 292.52, 0.000!!END! 4017!X=695.55, 4875.36, 288.26, 0.000!!END! 4018!X=696.55, 4875.36, 283.16, 0.000!!END! 4019!X=697.55, 4875.36, 270.6, 0.000!!END! 4020!X=698.55, 4875.36, 195.16, 0.000!!END! 4021!X=699.55, 4875.36, 194.18, 0.000!!END! 4022!X=700.55, 4875.36, 183.94, 0.000!!END! 4023!X=662.55, 4876.36, 283.64, 0.000!!END! 4024!X=663.55, 4876.36, 276.11, 0.000!!END! 4025!X=664.55, 4876.36, 267.08, 0.000!!END! 4026!X=665.55, 4876.36, 267.55, 0.000!!END! 4027!X=666.55, 4876.36, 264.66, 0.000!!END! 4028!X=667.55, 4876.36, 260.75, 0.000!!END! 4029!X=668.55, 4876.36, 265.69, 0.000!!END! 4030!X=669.55, 4876.36, 274.67, 0.000!!END! 4031!X=670.55, 4876.36, 286.12, 0.000!!END! 4032!X=671.55, 4876.36, 290.69, 0.000!!END! 4033!X=672.55, 4876.36, 273.09, 0.000!!END! 4034!X=673.55, 4876.36, 272.23, 0.000!!END! 4035!X=674.55, 4876.36, 253.12, 0.000!!END! 4036!X=675.55, 4876.36, 236.24, 0.000!!END! 4037!X=676.55, 4876.36, 226.22, 0.000!!END! 4038!X=677.55, 4876.36, 233.75, 0.000!!END! 4039!X=678.55, 4876.36, 266.12, 0.000!!END! 4040!X=679.55, 4876.36, 251.61, 0.000!!END! 4041!X=680.55, 4876.36, 222.18, 0.000!!END! 4042!X=681.55, 4876.36, 219.79, 0.000!!END! 4043!X=682.55, 4876.36, 228.77, 0.000!!END! 4044!X=683.55, 4876.36, 217.66, 0.000!!END! 4045!X=684.55, 4876.36, 217.47, 0.000!!END! 4046!X=685.55, 4876.36, 231.25, 0.000!!END! 4047!X=686.55, 4876.36, 250.41, 0.000!!END! 4048!X=687.55, 4876.36, 238.2, 0.000!!END! 4049!X=688.55, 4876.36, 210.68, 0.000!!END! 4050!X=689.55, 4876.36, 233.84, 0.000!!END! 4051!X=690.55, 4876.36, 236.78, 0.000!!END! 4052!X=691.55, 4876.36, 259.55, 0.000!!END! 4053!X=692.55, 4876.36, 264.83, 0.000!!END! 4054!X=693.55, 4876.36, 273.35, 0.000!!END! 4055!X=694.55, 4876.36, 295.23, 0.000!!END! 4056!X=695.55, 4876.36, 295.9, 0.000!!END! 4057!X=696.55, 4876.36, 255.82, 0.000!!END! Page 551 2. CALPUFF.INP 101 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 4058!X=697.55, 4876.36, 236.38, 0.000!!END! 4059!X=698.55, 4876.36, 209.16, 0.000!!END! 4060!X=699.55, 4876.36, 188.5, 0.000!!END! 4061!X=700.55, 4876.36, 178.36, 0.000!!END! 4062!X=662.55, 4877.36, 319.7, 0.000!!END! 4063!X=663.55, 4877.36, 307.82, 0.000!!END! 4064!X=664.55, 4877.36, 306.81, 0.000!!END! 4065!X=665.55, 4877.36, 287.71, 0.000!!END! 4066!X=666.55, 4877.36, 282.65, 0.000!!END! 4067!X=667.55, 4877.36, 275.55, 0.000!!END! 4068!X=668.55, 4877.36, 290.01, 0.000!!END! 4069!X=669.55, 4877.36, 303.58, 0.000!!END! 4070!X=670.55, 4877.36, 304.03, 0.000!!END! 4071!X=671.55, 4877.36, 304.05, 0.000!!END! 4072!X=672.55, 4877.36, 287.65, 0.000!!END! 4073!X=673.55, 4877.36, 280.7, 0.000!!END! 4074!X=674.55, 4877.36, 293.2, 0.000!!END! 4075!X=675.55, 4877.36, 291.54, 0.000!!END! 4076!X=676.55, 4877.36, 288.67, 0.000!!END! 4077!X=677.55, 4877.36, 285.27, 0.000!!END! 4078!X=678.55, 4877.36, 274.71, 0.000!!END! 4079!X=679.55, 4877.36, 262.87, 0.000!!END! 4080!X=680.55, 4877.36, 245.52, 0.000!!END! 4081!X=681.55, 4877.36, 228.93, 0.000!!END! 4082!X=682.55, 4877.36, 242.58, 0.000!!END! 4083!X=683.55, 4877.36, 236.1, 0.000!!END! 4084!X=684.55, 4877.36, 283.15, 0.000!!END! 4085!X=685.55, 4877.36, 260.92, 0.000!!END! 4086!X=686.55, 4877.36, 260.63, 0.000!!END! 4087!X=687.55, 4877.36, 266.55, 0.000!!END! 4088!X=688.55, 4877.36, 236.8, 0.000!!END! 4089!X=689.55, 4877.36, 240.22, 0.000!!END! 4090!X=690.55, 4877.36, 264.64, 0.000!!END! 4091!X=691.55, 4877.36, 270.82, 0.000!!END! 4092!X=692.55, 4877.36, 256.48, 0.000!!END! 4093!X=693.55, 4877.36, 245.15, 0.000!!END! 4094!X=694.55, 4877.36, 264.24, 0.000!!END! 4095!X=695.55, 4877.36, 233.58, 0.000!!END! 4096!X=696.55, 4877.36, 226.77, 0.000!!END! 4097!X=697.55, 4877.36, 224.63, 0.000!!END! 4098!X=698.55, 4877.36, 189.65, 0.000!!END! 4099!X=699.55, 4877.36, 180.21, 0.000!!END! 4100!X=700.55, 4877.36, 176.62, 0.000!!END! 4101!X=662.55, 4878.36, 314.83, 0.000!!END! 4102!X=663.55, 4878.36, 305.73, 0.000!!END! 4103!X=664.55, 4878.36, 304.89, 0.000!!END! 4104!X=665.55, 4878.36, 294.34, 0.000!!END! 4105!X=666.55, 4878.36, 312.29, 0.000!!END! 4106!X=667.55, 4878.36, 318.08, 0.000!!END! 4107!X=668.55, 4878.36, 315.99, 0.000!!END! 4108!X=669.55, 4878.36, 312.01, 0.000!!END! 4109!X=670.55, 4878.36, 322.77, 0.000!!END! 4110!X=671.55, 4878.36, 324.85, 0.000!!END! 4111!X=672.55, 4878.36, 315.18, 0.000!!END! 4112!X=673.55, 4878.36, 309.74, 0.000!!END! 4113!X=674.55, 4878.36, 307.47, 0.000!!END! 4114!X=675.55, 4878.36, 318.22, 0.000!!END! 4115!X=676.55, 4878.36, 317.12, 0.000!!END! 4116!X=677.55, 4878.36, 304.97, 0.000!!END! 4117!X=678.55, 4878.36, 289.85, 0.000!!END! 4118!X=679.55, 4878.36, 260.22, 0.000!!END! 4119!X=680.55, 4878.36, 260.13, 0.000!!END! 4120!X=681.55, 4878.36, 255.23, 0.000!!END! 4121!X=682.55, 4878.36, 272.33, 0.000!!END! 4122!X=683.55, 4878.36, 276.11, 0.000!!END! 4123!X=684.55, 4878.36, 302.21, 0.000!!END! Page 552 2. CALPUFF.INP 102 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 4124!X=685.55, 4878.36, 287.38, 0.000!!END! 4125!X=686.55, 4878.36, 290.16, 0.000!!END! 4126!X=687.55, 4878.36, 272.27, 0.000!!END! 4127!X=688.55, 4878.36, 263.02, 0.000!!END! 4128!X=689.55, 4878.36, 274.86, 0.000!!END! 4129!X=690.55, 4878.36, 272.75, 0.000!!END! 4130!X=691.55, 4878.36, 285.88, 0.000!!END! 4131!X=692.55, 4878.36, 259.83, 0.000!!END! 4132!X=693.55, 4878.36, 278.55, 0.000!!END! 4133!X=694.55, 4878.36, 240.79, 0.000!!END! 4134!X=695.55, 4878.36, 231.47, 0.000!!END! 4135!X=696.55, 4878.36, 218.2, 0.000!!END! 4136!X=697.55, 4878.36, 195.08, 0.000!!END! 4137!X=698.55, 4878.36, 194.21, 0.000!!END! 4138!X=699.55, 4878.36, 205.36, 0.000!!END! 4139!X=700.55, 4878.36, 183.36, 0.000!!END! 4140!X=662.55, 4879.36, 302.74, 0.000!!END! 4141!X=663.55, 4879.36, 296.86, 0.000!!END! 4142!X=664.55, 4879.36, 294.73, 0.000!!END! 4143!X=665.55, 4879.36, 270.38, 0.000!!END! 4144!X=666.55, 4879.36, 286.32, 0.000!!END! 4145!X=667.55, 4879.36, 289.56, 0.000!!END! 4146!X=668.55, 4879.36, 300.41, 0.000!!END! 4147!X=669.55, 4879.36, 314.5, 0.000!!END! 4148!X=670.55, 4879.36, 315.29, 0.000!!END! 4149!X=671.55, 4879.36, 336.32, 0.000!!END! 4150!X=672.55, 4879.36, 338.2, 0.000!!END! 4151!X=673.55, 4879.36, 319.17, 0.000!!END! 4152!X=674.55, 4879.36, 314.11, 0.000!!END! 4153!X=675.55, 4879.36, 323.47, 0.000!!END! 4154!X=676.55, 4879.36, 323.25, 0.000!!END! 4155!X=677.55, 4879.36, 327.42, 0.000!!END! 4156!X=678.55, 4879.36, 299.56, 0.000!!END! 4157!X=679.55, 4879.36, 285.48, 0.000!!END! 4158!X=680.55, 4879.36, 296.23, 0.000!!END! 4159!X=681.55, 4879.36, 296.31, 0.000!!END! 4160!X=682.55, 4879.36, 296.88, 0.000!!END! 4161!X=683.55, 4879.36, 315.88, 0.000!!END! 4162!X=684.55, 4879.36, 336.13, 0.000!!END! 4163!X=685.55, 4879.36, 315.73, 0.000!!END! 4164!X=686.55, 4879.36, 298.11, 0.000!!END! 4165!X=687.55, 4879.36, 290.32, 0.000!!END! 4166!X=688.55, 4879.36, 292.81, 0.000!!END! 4167!X=689.55, 4879.36, 292.92, 0.000!!END! 4168!X=690.55, 4879.36, 304.91, 0.000!!END! 4169!X=691.55, 4879.36, 296.56, 0.000!!END! 4170!X=692.55, 4879.36, 296.95, 0.000!!END! 4171!X=693.55, 4879.36, 267.07, 0.000!!END! 4172!X=694.55, 4879.36, 264.59, 0.000!!END! 4173!X=695.55, 4879.36, 281.53, 0.000!!END! 4174!X=696.55, 4879.36, 235.87, 0.000!!END! 4175!X=697.55, 4879.36, 214.7, 0.000!!END! 4176!X=698.55, 4879.36, 200.67, 0.000!!END! 4177!X=699.55, 4879.36, 202, 0.000!!END! 4178!X=700.55, 4879.36, 191.45, 0.000!!END! 4179!X=662.55, 4880.36, 288.33, 0.000!!END! 4180!X=663.55, 4880.36, 290.82, 0.000!!END! 4181!X=664.55, 4880.36, 278.48, 0.000!!END! 4182!X=665.55, 4880.36, 261.8, 0.000!!END! 4183!X=666.55, 4880.36, 264.21, 0.000!!END! 4184!X=667.55, 4880.36, 268.9, 0.000!!END! 4185!X=668.55, 4880.36, 274.32, 0.000!!END! 4186!X=669.55, 4880.36, 284, 0.000!!END! 4187!X=670.55, 4880.36, 304.44, 0.000!!END! 4188!X=671.55, 4880.36, 326.52, 0.000!!END! 4189!X=672.55, 4880.36, 331.34, 0.000!!END! Page 553 2. CALPUFF.INP 103 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 4190!X=673.55, 4880.36, 339.94, 0.000!!END! 4191!X=674.55, 4880.36, 322.97, 0.000!!END! 4192!X=675.55, 4880.36, 343.8, 0.000!!END! 4193!X=676.55, 4880.36, 316.48, 0.000!!END! 4194!X=677.55, 4880.36, 332.22, 0.000!!END! 4195!X=678.55, 4880.36, 329.87, 0.000!!END! 4196!X=679.55, 4880.36, 307.09, 0.000!!END! 4197!X=680.55, 4880.36, 336.11, 0.000!!END! 4198!X=681.55, 4880.36, 334.41, 0.000!!END! 4199!X=682.55, 4880.36, 355.02, 0.000!!END! 4200!X=683.55, 4880.36, 347.54, 0.000!!END! 4201!X=684.55, 4880.36, 341.47, 0.000!!END! 4202!X=685.55, 4880.36, 337.24, 0.000!!END! 4203!X=686.55, 4880.36, 321.17, 0.000!!END! 4204!X=687.55, 4880.36, 344.92, 0.000!!END! 4205!X=688.55, 4880.36, 348.84, 0.000!!END! 4206!X=689.55, 4880.36, 320.41, 0.000!!END! 4207!X=690.55, 4880.36, 312.15, 0.000!!END! 4208!X=691.55, 4880.36, 328.08, 0.000!!END! 4209!X=692.55, 4880.36, 327.63, 0.000!!END! 4210!X=693.55, 4880.36, 308.16, 0.000!!END! 4211!X=694.55, 4880.36, 288.65, 0.000!!END! 4212!X=695.55, 4880.36, 268.98, 0.000!!END! 4213!X=696.55, 4880.36, 252.63, 0.000!!END! 4214!X=697.55, 4880.36, 244.23, 0.000!!END! 4215!X=698.55, 4880.36, 217.06, 0.000!!END! 4216!X=699.55, 4880.36, 210.62, 0.000!!END! 4217!X=700.55, 4880.36, 221.73, 0.000!!END! 4218!X=680.422, 4860.198, 96.1, 0.000!!END! 4219!X=680.432, 4860.195, 96.2, 0.000!!END! 4220!X=680.441, 4860.192, 96.3, 0.000!!END! 4221!X=680.451, 4860.189, 96.4, 0.000!!END! 4222!X=680.46, 4860.186, 96.4, 0.000!!END! 4223!X=680.47, 4860.182, 96.4, 0.000!!END! 4224!X=680.479, 4860.179, 96.4, 0.000!!END! 4225!X=680.489, 4860.176, 96.4, 0.000!!END! 4226!X=680.498, 4860.173, 96.3, 0.000!!END! 4227!X=680.508, 4860.17, 96.2, 0.000!!END! 4228!X=680.517, 4860.167, 96.1, 0.000!!END! 4229!X=680.527, 4860.164, 96, 0.000!!END! 4230!X=680.536, 4860.161, 95.9, 0.000!!END! 4231!X=680.546, 4860.157, 95.9, 0.000!!END! 4232!X=680.555, 4860.154, 95.8, 0.000!!END! 4233!X=680.565, 4860.151, 95.8, 0.000!!END! 4234!X=680.574, 4860.148, 95.8, 0.000!!END! 4235!X=680.584, 4860.145, 95.9, 0.000!!END! 4236!X=680.593, 4860.142, 96.1, 0.000!!END! 4237!X=680.603, 4860.139, 96.3, 0.000!!END! 4238!X=680.612, 4860.136, 96.5, 0.000!!END! 4239!X=680.622, 4860.133, 96.7, 0.000!!END! 4240!X=680.632, 4860.131, 96.8, 0.000!!END! 4241!X=680.642, 4860.128, 97, 0.000!!END! 4242!X=680.651, 4860.126, 97, 0.000!!END! 4243!X=680.657, 4860.129, 97, 0.000!!END! 4244!X=680.659, 4860.139, 97.1, 0.000!!END! 4245!X=680.657, 4860.145, 97.3, 0.000!!END! 4246!X=680.658, 4860.155, 97.4, 0.000!!END! 4247!X=680.66, 4860.165, 97.5, 0.000!!END! 4248!X=680.662, 4860.175, 97.7, 0.000!!END! 4249!X=680.669, 4860.177, 97.6, 0.000!!END! 4250!X=680.671, 4860.187, 97.9, 0.000!!END! 4251!X=680.672, 4860.197, 98.2, 0.000!!END! 4252!X=680.673, 4860.207, 98.5, 0.000!!END! 4253!X=680.675, 4860.216, 98.8, 0.000!!END! 4254!X=680.676, 4860.226, 99.2, 0.000!!END! 4255!X=680.678, 4860.236, 99.5, 0.000!!END! Page 554 2. CALPUFF.INP 104 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 4256!X=680.679, 4860.246, 99.8, 0.000!!END! 4257!X=680.68, 4860.256, 100.2, 0.000!!END! 4258!X=680.685, 4860.264, 100.4, 0.000!!END! 4259!X=680.692, 4860.271, 100.3, 0.000!!END! 4260!X=680.699, 4860.279, 100.2, 0.000!!END! 4261!X=680.706, 4860.286, 100.1, 0.000!!END! 4262!X=680.713, 4860.293, 100.1, 0.000!!END! 4263!X=680.715, 4860.301, 100.1, 0.000!!END! 4264!X=680.712, 4860.311, 100.1, 0.000!!END! 4265!X=680.709, 4860.32, 100, 0.000!!END! 4266!X=680.706, 4860.33, 100, 0.000!!END! 4267!X=680.703, 4860.339, 100.1, 0.000!!END! 4268!X=680.7, 4860.349, 100.1, 0.000!!END! 4269!X=680.697, 4860.358, 100.2, 0.000!!END! 4270!X=680.694, 4860.368, 100.3, 0.000!!END! 4271!X=680.691, 4860.378, 100.4, 0.000!!END! 4272!X=680.688, 4860.387, 100.4, 0.000!!END! 4273!X=680.685, 4860.397, 100.5, 0.000!!END! 4274!X=680.682, 4860.406, 100.5, 0.000!!END! 4275!X=680.679, 4860.416, 100.5, 0.000!!END! 4276!X=680.676, 4860.425, 100.5, 0.000!!END! 4277!X=680.673, 4860.435, 100.5, 0.000!!END! 4278!X=680.67, 4860.444, 100.5, 0.000!!END! 4279!X=680.667, 4860.454, 100.5, 0.000!!END! 4280!X=680.664, 4860.463, 100.7, 0.000!!END! 4281!X=680.661, 4860.473, 100.9, 0.000!!END! 4282!X=680.657, 4860.482, 101.1, 0.000!!END! 4283!X=680.654, 4860.492, 101.3, 0.000!!END! 4284!X=680.651, 4860.501, 101.6, 0.000!!END! 4285!X=680.648, 4860.511, 101.9, 0.000!!END! 4286!X=680.645, 4860.52, 102.2, 0.000!!END! 4287!X=680.642, 4860.53, 102.5, 0.000!!END! 4288!X=680.639, 4860.539, 102.9, 0.000!!END! 4289!X=680.636, 4860.549, 103.2, 0.000!!END! 4290!X=680.633, 4860.558, 103.3, 0.000!!END! 4291!X=680.63, 4860.568, 103.5, 0.000!!END! 4292!X=680.627, 4860.577, 103.6, 0.000!!END! 4293!X=680.621, 4860.58, 103.5, 0.000!!END! 4294!X=680.611, 4860.577, 103.1, 0.000!!END! 4295!X=680.602, 4860.573, 102.7, 0.000!!END! 4296!X=680.592, 4860.57, 102.2, 0.000!!END! 4297!X=680.583, 4860.566, 101.8, 0.000!!END! 4298!X=680.573, 4860.564, 101.3, 0.000!!END! 4299!X=680.564, 4860.561, 100.9, 0.000!!END! 4300!X=680.554, 4860.558, 100.7, 0.000!!END! 4301!X=680.545, 4860.555, 100.4, 0.000!!END! 4302!X=680.535, 4860.552, 100.1, 0.000!!END! 4303!X=680.526, 4860.549, 99.8, 0.000!!END! 4304!X=680.516, 4860.546, 99.6, 0.000!!END! 4305!X=680.507, 4860.543, 99.3, 0.000!!END! 4306!X=680.497, 4860.54, 99.1, 0.000!!END! 4307!X=680.487, 4860.537, 98.8, 0.000!!END! 4308!X=680.478, 4860.534, 98.7, 0.000!!END! 4309!X=680.468, 4860.531, 98.6, 0.000!!END! 4310!X=680.459, 4860.528, 98.6, 0.000!!END! 4311!X=680.449, 4860.525, 98.6, 0.000!!END! 4312!X=680.44, 4860.522, 98.6, 0.000!!END! 4313!X=680.43, 4860.519, 98.5, 0.000!!END! 4314!X=680.421, 4860.516, 98.3, 0.000!!END! 4315!X=680.411, 4860.513, 98.1, 0.000!!END! 4316!X=680.402, 4860.51, 97.9, 0.000!!END! 4317!X=680.392, 4860.507, 97.6, 0.000!!END! 4318!X=680.382, 4860.504, 97.4, 0.000!!END! 4319!X=680.373, 4860.501, 97.2, 0.000!!END! 4320!X=680.363, 4860.498, 97.3, 0.000!!END! 4321!X=680.354, 4860.495, 97.7, 0.000!!END! Page 555 2. CALPUFF.INP 105 / 105 July 06, 2021 Crimson Editor 4322!X=680.344, 4860.492, 98.1, 0.000!!END! 4323!X=680.335, 4860.489, 98.5, 0.000!!END! 4324!X=680.337, 4860.48, 98.5, 0.000!!END! 4325!X=680.34, 4860.47, 98.6, 0.000!!END! 4326!X=680.343, 4860.461, 98.7, 0.000!!END! 4327!X=680.346, 4860.451, 98.8, 0.000!!END! 4328!X=680.349, 4860.441, 99, 0.000!!END! 4329!X=680.352, 4860.432, 98.9, 0.000!!END! 4330!X=680.355, 4860.422, 98.7, 0.000!!END! 4331!X=680.357, 4860.413, 98.5, 0.000!!END! 4332!X=680.36, 4860.403, 98.3, 0.000!!END! 4333!X=680.363, 4860.394, 98.1, 0.000!!END! 4334!X=680.366, 4860.384, 97.9, 0.000!!END! 4335!X=680.369, 4860.374, 97.6, 0.000!!END! 4336!X=680.372, 4860.365, 97.4, 0.000!!END! 4337!X=680.375, 4860.355, 97.3, 0.000!!END! 4338!X=680.378, 4860.346, 97.1, 0.000!!END! 4339!X=680.381, 4860.336, 97, 0.000!!END! 4340!X=680.384, 4860.327, 96.9, 0.000!!END! 4341!X=680.386, 4860.317, 96.7, 0.000!!END! 4342!X=680.389, 4860.307, 96.6, 0.000!!END! 4343!X=680.392, 4860.298, 96.5, 0.000!!END! 4344!X=680.395, 4860.288, 96.3, 0.000!!END! 4345!X=680.398, 4860.279, 96.2, 0.000!!END! 4346!X=680.401, 4860.269, 96.1, 0.000!!END! 4347!X=680.404, 4860.26, 96, 0.000!!END! 4348!X=680.407, 4860.25, 95.9, 0.000!!END! 4349!X=680.41, 4860.24, 96, 0.000!!END! 4350!X=680.413, 4860.231, 96.1, 0.000!!END! 4351!X=680.415, 4860.221, 96.1, 0.000!!END! 4352!X=680.418, 4860.212, 96.1, 0.000!!END! 4353!X=680.421, 4860.202, 96.1, 0.000!!END! ------------- a Data for each receptor are treated as a separate input subgroup and therefore must end with an input group terminator. b Receptor height above ground is optional. If no value is entered, the receptor is placed on the ground. c Receptors can be assigned using group names provided in 20b. If no group names are used (NRGRP=0) then the default assignment name X must be used. Page 556 Page 557 Air Quality Specialist Page 558 Page 559 Page 560 Page 561 Comparison of Modelled Scenarios Indicator Compound CAS No. Averaging Period Background Concentration [µg/m³] 140,000 TPA (Scenario 1A) 160,000 TPA (Scenario 2A) Percentage Change of Maximum Concentration [%] Percentage Change of Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [%] Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Page 562 Indicator Compound CAS No. Averaging Period Background Concentration [µg/m³] 140,000 TPA (Scenario 1A) 160,000 TPA (Scenario 2A) Percentage Change of Maximum Concentration [%] Percentage Change of Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [%] Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Page 563 Indicator Compound CAS No. Averaging Period Background Concentration [µg/m³] 140,000 TPA (Scenario 1A) 160,000 TPA (Scenario 2A) Percentage Change of Maximum Concentration [%] Percentage Change of Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [%] Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] 1.17 25.65 1.13 25.62 1.10 14.32 1.06 14.28 Page 564 Indicator Compound CAS No. Averaging Period Background Concentration [µg/m³] 140,000 TPA (Scenario 1A) 160,000 TPA (Scenario 2A) Percentage Change of Maximum Concentration [%] Percentage Change of Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [%] Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Total Facility Emission Rate [g/s] Maximum POI Concentration [µg/m³] Maximum Concentration (Including Background) [µg/m³] Page 565 Page 566 Page 567 Page 568 Durham York Energy Centre Throughput Increase (From 140,000 to 160,000 tonnes per year) Notice of Commencement Works Department July 3, 2019 Public Notice The Regional Municipalities of Durham and York, the owners of the Durham York Energy Centre (DYEC), have commenced an Environmental Screening Process in accordance with the Waste Management Projects Regulation (Ontario Regulation 101/07) of the Environmental Assessment Act to amend the Environmental Compliance Approval for the DYEC. The DYEC site is located at 1835 Energy Drive in the Municipality of Clarington, Ontario, Canada and has been in commercial operation since 2016. The DYEC is a waste management facility that produces energy from the combustion of residential garbage that remains after maximizing waste diversion programs in Durham and York Regions. The Proposed Undertaking: The Environmental Compliance Approval for the DYEC currently allows the facility to process up to a maximum of 140,000 tonnes per year of waste for disposal at the site. The Regions are proposing to increase this amount by 20,000 tonnes per year for a total of 160,000 tonnes. The facility is capable of processing 160,000 tonnes per year with its current equipment and is currently being underutilized despite demand for additional waste disposal capacity for residential waste within the Regions. If approved, the expanded tonnage will allow for greater usage of the existing facility, reducing the reliance on alternate waste disposal facilities outside the Regions’ borders. The Process: The proposed project is subject to the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Park’s Environmental Screening Process for Waste Management Projects in accordance with Ontario Regulation 101/07 under the Environmental Assessment Act. The results will be documented in an Environmental Screening Report, which will be released for public and agency review. During the June 26, 2019 Durham Regional Council Meeting, Council provided the approval to conduct the Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference for a separate and possible future expansion to 250,000 tonnes per year at the DYEC. As well, Council approved plans to construct an anaerobic digestion facility with mixed waste processing. These are separate projects and will be conducted under individual approvals processes. Figure 1 – EA Study Area Page 569 Consultation: There will be public consultations this summer and fall regarding the study and information will be released as the study progresses. For more information about this project visit durhamyorkwaste.ca or sign up for email updates under the What’s New section on the home page. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact the project manager listed below: Andrew Evans, M.A.Sc, P.Eng Project Manager Durham York Energy Centre 905-404-0888 ext. 4130 mailto:info@durhamyorkwaste.ca If you require this information in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1102 ext. 3560. http://www.facebook.com/RegionOfDurham http://www.twitter.com/RegionOfDurham The Regional Municipality of Durham Works Department 605 Rossland Road East, Whitby, Ontario L1N 6A3 Telephone: 905-668-7711 or 1-800-372-1102 durham.ca Page 570 From:Laura Malyjasiak To:ClerksExternalEmail Cc:Gioseph Anello; Angela Porteous Subject:Update on Durham Region Waste Management Projects Date:October 21, 2021 11:43:43 AM Attachments:image001.jpg image002.jpg image003.png image004.png image005.png update slides Oct 2021.pdf You don't often get email from laura.malyjasiak@durham.ca. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL The following email is provided on behalf of Gioseph Anello, Director Waste Management Services, Regional Municipality of Durham Region of Durham Waste Management staff recently hosted a virtual meeting with staff representatives from Durham Region local area municipalities. The purpose of the meeting was to provide an update on waste management projects and legislative changes that will impact waste management practices in Durham Region. A copy of the presentation for this meeting is enclosed. Please provide it to Clarington Council in an upcoming council information package. Laura Malyjasiak | Waste Management Technician The Regional Municipality of Durham Laura.Malyjasiak@durham.ca | 905-668-7711 extension 3013 | durham.ca/waste My pronouns are she/her THIS MESSAGE IS FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S) ONLY AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY, CONFIDENTIAL, AND/OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER ANY RELEVANT PRIVACY LEGISLATION. No rights to any privilege have been waived. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, re-transmission, dissemination, distribution, copying, conversion to hard copy, taking of action in reliance on or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and delete or destroy all copies of this message. Page 571 Waste Management Update Local Area Municipalities October 15, 2021 Page 572 durham.ca Mixed Waste Pre-sort and Anaerobic Digestion •Pre -qualification closed in December 2020 with three qualified bidders: o Alberici Constructors Inc. o Maple Reinders Constructors Ltd. o Sacyr Environmental USA LLC •Currently in a negotiated RFP process with these three bidders •RFP closes March 2022 •Expect award of contract in June 2022 2Page 573 durham.ca DYEC Capacity Increase ECA Amendment for 160,000 tonnes per year •Updated Emissions Summary and Dispersion Modelling completed •Environmental Screening Report updated and submitted to Ministry of Environment Conservation and Parks for review •Notice of Completion anticipated in early 2022 Facility Expansion to 250,000 tonnes per year –not moving forward at this time 3Page 574 durham.ca Extended Producer Responsibility –Blue Box •All Durham Region local municipalities scheduled to transition out of the Blue Box program July 1, 2024 •Initial data submission to RPRA completed by September 30, 2021deadline •Council report planned for November to obtain direction on blue box collection in BIAs and other small businesses along residential routes –these will not automatically transfer to producer responsibility •Durham to issue RFP to prepare for eventual MRF disposition –operating for Region until June 30, 2024 then under lease to contractor operating under EPR •A second, more detailed, data submission due to RPRA by August 31, 2022 4Page 575 durham.ca Waste Management Facilities •The Oshawa WMF remains the busiest in the Region with up to 1900 daily visits in peak periods •Traffic at Oshawa is expected to increase with residential development underway or planned for Whitby and Oshawa •Consultant retained to develop three design concepts considering a 20 –25 year horizon: o Enhance existing WMF o New outdoor facility o New indoor facility •Any construction will be phased so site can remain open to the public •Improvements at Oshawa will be evaluated for implementation at Brock and Scugog 5Page 576 durham.ca Long-term Waste Management Plan 2021 -2040 •Council has approved Guiding Principles, Vision and Objectives •Phase 2 consultation with local municipal staff this spring –focus on targets and actions to support the Council approved objectives •Public consultation is currently underway –Virtual Town Hall scheduled for October 19, consultation ends October 25 •Revisions to draft Waste Plan and targets and actions based on consultation feed-back this fall •Draft Waste Plan and Five-year Action Plan to Council for approval December 2021/January 2022 6Page 577 durham.ca @RegionofDurham Questions? Gio Anello Director, Waste Management Services Gioseph.Anello@durham.ca Page 578 From:Clerks@vaughan.ca To:ClerksExternalEmail Subject:Item 32, Committee of the Whole Report No. 39, September 27, 2021 Date:October 19, 2021 3:08:22 PM Attachments:image001.png You don't often get email from clerks@vaughan.ca. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL October 19, 2021 Sent on behalf of Todd Coles, City Clerk John Paul Newman Deputy Clerk Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance St. Bowmanville, ON L1C 3A6 Dear John Paul Newman: RE: ENDORSING NATIONAL TEEN DRIVER SAFETY WEEK AND REQUESTING THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION TO REVIEW MEASURES IMPACTING NEWLY LICENSED DRIVERS Linked for your information is Item 32, Report No. 39, of the Committee of the Whole regarding the above-noted matter, which was adopted without amendment by the Council of the City of Vaughan at its meeting of September 27, 2021. I draw your attention to the Resolution recommendation, as follows: 3. That the City Clerk forward a copy of this resolution to the Premier, the Minister of Transportation, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, all municipalities in Ontario, the York Regional Police, the Ontario Safety League, the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police, and Parachute. If the above link does not work, please refer to the following Post-Agenda page, and locate the item accordingly. For your information, the resolution previously submitted by Councillor Sandra Yeung Racco regarding “RAISING THE LEGAL AGE FOR A LICENSED DRIVER FROM 16 TO 18” in June 2021 was deferred to the Committee of the Whole meeting in September. At its meeting of September 27, 2021, Council resolved to receive the resolution and no further action be taken. To assist us in responding to inquiries, please quote the item and report number. For inquiries, please reply to clerks@vaughan.ca. Sincerely, Todd Coles City Clerk Attachment: Extract (linked) TC/fl Page 579 This e-mail, including any attachment(s), may be confidential and is intended solely for the attention and information of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify me immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete the original transmission from your computer, including any attachment(s). Any unauthorized distribution, disclosure or copying of this message and attachment(s) by anyone other than the recipient is strictly prohibited. Page 580 CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 Item 32, Report No.39, of the Committee of the Whole, which was adopted without amendment by the Council of the City of Vaughan on September 27, 2021. 32. ENDORSING NATIONAL TEEN DRIVER SAFETY WEEK AND REQUESTING THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION TO REVIEW MEASURES IMPACTING NEWLY LICENSED DRIVERS The Committee of the Whole recommends approval of the recommendations contained in the resolution of Councillor Yeung Racco and Regional Councillor Rosati dated September 14, 2021. Member's Resolution Submitted by Councillor Yeung Racco and Regional Councillor Rosati Whereas, City of Vaughan Council is concerned about the continued occurrence of serious motor vehicle collisions involving newly licensed drivers and drivers under the age of 18; and Whereas, a shocking and tragic collision involving a 16-year old driver occurred on May 16th, 2021 on Athabasca Avenue in the City of Vaughan, resulting in the fatality of two young children; and Whereas, City of Vaughan Council deferred the Resolution titled “Raising the Legal Age for a Licensed Driver from 16 to 18” on June 1, 2021 t o a September Committee of the Whole meeting for further review and research; and Whereas, the Province of Ontario has legislative authority over driver licensing, highways, automobile insurance, and the enforcement and prosecution of the federal criminal law; and Whereas, the Ontario Ministry of Transportation administers the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8; and Whereas, the Ontario Ministry of Transportation published the “Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018”, being the most recent report issued, containing statistics that demonstrate that the percentage of young, licensed drivers, ages 17 to 20, that were involved in vehicle collisions is higher than any other age group; and Whereas, York Region published “2020 Traveller Safety Report” which provided that, based on collision data from the York Regional Police motor vehicle accident reports, drivers below the age of 25 have a higher at -fault collision rate and higher fatality rate in collisions than any other age group; and …/2 Page 581 CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 Item 32, CW Report 39 – Page 2 Whereas, the Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators published “Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025” and identifies drivers that are either under the age of 25 or have less than two years of driving experience as a ‘risk group’ based on several contribut ing factors, some including distracted driving, impaired driving, speeding, passive safety, and road infrastructure; and Whereas, City of Vaughan Council wishes to see change effected to Ontario’s driving laws under the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, with respect to newly licensed drivers; and Whereas, Parachute, a Canadian charity, has launched a national awareness campaign to help educate Canadians on road safety and increase awareness on preventing serious and fatal injuries caused by motor vehicle accidents; and Whereas, National Teen Driver Safety Week, hosted by Parachute and supported by many other Canadian jurisdictions, is a week dedicated to educating the youth about road safety and raise awareness of risks associated with driving to help prevent youth fatalities on the road across Canada. It is therefore recommended: 1. That City of Vaughan Council request for the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario to undertake a review of the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8 with respect to measures impacting newly licensed drivers, such as implementing additional training and penalty provisions, to achieve greater education, and awareness of road safety and increase accountability and responsibility of new and young drivers through the legislative framework; and 2. That City of Vaughan Council unanimously endorse National Teen Driver Safety Week, to be held October 17 to 23, 2021; and 3. That the City Clerk forward a copy of this resolution to the Premier, the Minister of Transportation, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, all municipalities in Ontario, the York Regional Police, the Ontario Safety League, the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police, and Parachute. Page 582 Item 32 Page 1 of 3 MEMBER’S RESOLUTION Committee of the Whole (1) Report DATE: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 TITLE: ENDORSING NATIONAL TEEN DRIVER SAFETY WEEK AND REQUESTING THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION TO REVIEW MEASURES IMPACTING NEWLY LICENSED DRIVERS FROM: Councillor Sandra Yeung Racco Regional Councillor Gino Rosati Whereas, City of Vaughan Council is concerned about the continued occurrence of serious motor vehicle collisions involving newly licensed drivers and drivers under the age of 18; and Whereas, a shocking and tragic collision involving a 16-year old driver occurred on May 16, 2021 on Athabasca Avenue in the City of Vaughan, resulting in the fatality of two young children; and Whereas, City of Vaughan Council deferred the Resolution titled “Raising the Legal Age for a Licensed Driver from 16 to 18” on June 1, 2021 to a September Committee of the Whole meeting for further review and research; and Whereas, the Province of Ontario has legislative authority over driver licensing, highways, automobile insurance, and the enforcement and prosecution of the federal criminal law; and Whereas, the Ontario Ministry of Transportation administers the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8; and Whereas, the Ontario Ministry of Transportation published the “Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018”, being the most recent report issued, containing statistics that Page 583 Item 32 Page 2 of 3 demonstrate that the percentage of young, licensed drivers, aged 17 to 20, that were involved in vehicle collisions is higher than any other age group; and Whereas, York Region published “2020 Traveller Safety Report” which provided that, based on collision data from the York Regional Police motor vehicle accident reports, drivers below the age of 25 have a higher at-fault collision rate and higher fatality rate in collisions than any other age group; and Whereas, the Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators published “Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025” and identifies drivers that are either under the age of 25 or have less than two years of driving experience as a ‘risk group’ based on several contributing factors, some including distracted driving, impaired driving, speeding, passive safety, and road infrastructure; and Whereas, City of Vaughan Council wishes to see change effected to Ontario’s driving laws under the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, with respect to newly licensed drivers; and Whereas, Parachute, a Canadian charity, has launched a national awareness campaign to help educate Canadians on road safety and increase awareness on preventing serious and fatal injuries caused by motor vehicle accidents; and Whereas, National Teen Driver Safety Week, hosted by Parachute and supported by many other Canadian jurisdictions, is a week dedicated to educating the youth about road safety and raising awareness of risks associated with driving to help prevent youth fatalities on the road across Canada. It is therefore recommended: 1. That City of Vaughan Council request the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario to undertake a review of the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8 with respect to measures impacting newly licensed drivers, such as implementing additional training and penalty provisions, to achieve greater education, and awareness of road safety and increased accountability and responsibility of new and young drivers through the legislative framework; and 2. That City of Vaughan Council unanimously endorse National Teen Driver Safety Week, to be held October 17 to 23, 2021; and 3. That the City Clerk forward a copy of this resolution to the Premier, the Minister of Transportation, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, all municipalities in Ontario, York Regional Police, Ontario Safety League, Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police, and Parachute. Page 584 Item 32 Page 3 of 3 Attachments 1. Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018, page 34 2. York Region’s 2020 Traveller Safety Report, page 21 3. Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 by Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators, page 7-8 4. National Teen Driver Safety Week by Parachute Page 585 Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Ministry of Transportation Page 586 This document is available online at: ontario.ca/orsar. If you are seeking information on driving and road safety in Ontario, visit the ontario.ca/transportation. (MTO) Driver’s Handbook is available online. You can also purchase copies at DriveTest centres, select ServiceOntario centres, online at Publications Ontario (ontario.ca/publications), or from a retail store near you. For more information on the data in this publication, please contact the Safety Program Development Branch at 416-235-3585. Produced by: Safety Program Development Branch Ministry of Transportation Toronto, Ontario M3M 0B4 ISSN #0832-8269 (Printed Version) ISSN #1710-2480 (Internet Version) ii Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Page 587 iiiOntario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Contents Foreword 1 1. Overview 12 1B Health Perspective 15 2. The People 16 3. The Collision 35 3B Time and Environment 40 4. Place of Collision 45 5. The Vehicle 62 6. Special Vehicles 68 6B School Vehicles 70 6F Bicycles 75 8. Appendix 81 Page 588 ivOntario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Tables and Figures Tables Fiscal Year 2018/2019 15 in Ontario, Fiscal Year 2018/2019 15 Page 589 vOntario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Tables and Figures Vehicle Population by Type of Vehicle, 2018 66 Selected Types of Vehicles by Model Year, 2019 and earlier 67 Pupils Transported Daily, Total Number of School Vehicles Involved (Number of Persons) 70 Page 590 viOntario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Tables and Figures Page 591 1Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Foreword Page 592 2Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Ontario’s roads continue to be among the ranked number one in road safety. Ontario’s fatality rate of 0.58 per 10,000 licensed drivers was the lowest in all of our province has ranked in the top Ontario roads was 602. What is the Ontario Road Safety Annual Report (ORSAR)? people’s attitudes evolve over time, so do transportation needs and demands. With shifting economic and demographic factors, new road safety challenges can arise. to monitor its progress in improving road safety year-by-year. The report provides valuable data and helps guide the government in making decisions related Transportation (MTO) for policy and program analysis and development, road safety research, public education and prevention organizations, transportation associations, research institutions, police services and other ministries To help the government address and valuable insights about long-term and emerging trends in Ontario and across other Foreword Page 593 3Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Foreword police services, other ministries, and the average one person is killed on Ontario’s roads every 15 hours. By continuing to work with our road safety partners and Ontario will continue to develop new and innovative road safety strategies that will help save lives and keep our roads among the safest in the world. Key Road Safety Findings for Ontario in 2018 For more than two decades, Ontario has measured road safety by calculating the number of collision-related fatalities for every 10,000 licensed drivers. In Ontario, the fatality rate per 10,000 licensed drivers in 2018 was 0.58. The actual number of fatalities was 602. roads was 1,701, a decrease of 35% over the past decade. Category 2017 2018 617 602 Fatality Rate per 10,000 0.61 0.58 Top Priority Road Safety Issues after year. We can take pride in milestone achievements, but keep in mind that they are more, to save more lives. In recent years, the Ontario government has led the way by working with many road safety partners, including police, public health and safety organizations in the public, corporate these partners, Ontario has developed and introduced numerous pieces of legislation aimed at making our roads safer each year by measures include: school bus stop arm camera evidence Increasing penalties for pedestrian-related offences Establishing higher fines and increased penalties for distracted driving Ignition Interlock program to repeat offenders New rules for drug-impaired driving that mirror alcohol to commercial drivers Increased penalties for various infractions by creating new sanctions for fine defaulters on the highway from roadbuilding machine to commercial motor vehicle commercial vehicle safety regime Page 594 4Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Foreword legislative initiatives, combined with strong enforcement and education, are achieving results, while at the same time demonstrating that there is also room Pedestrians from 114 in 2017 to 134 in 2018, up 18%. Over the last decade, there has been a gradual increase in pedestrian fatalities as a proportion of all fatalities; in 2009, pedestrians represented 20% of all road users killed and in 2018, they represented 22%. Large Truck Fatalities There were 95 fatalities in collisions involving large trucks in 2018, down from 141 in 2017, a decrease of 33%. In addition, 5% of the crashes had an apparent defect that may have contributed to the crash. The number of people killed in Ontario in collisions involving an inattentive driver decreased from 107 in 2017 to 86 in 2018, down 20%. Inattentive driving was a factor in 14% of all fatalities on Ontario roads in 2018. of drinking and driving fatalities decreased from 133 in 2017 to 130 in 2018, down 2%. Ontario’s drinking and driving fatality rate was 0.12 per 10,000 licensed drivers, a reduction of 83% from 0.72 in 1988. The number of fatalities attributed to drugs other than alcohol increased from 75 in 2017 to 89 in 2018, up 19%. Speeding/Street Racing The number of people killed in Ontario in speed-related collisions decreased from Fatalities among senior drivers age 80 and over increased by 12% from 25 in 2017 to 28 in 2018. The number of licensed senior drivers (80+) has increased two-fold over the 1999 to more than 330,000 in 2018. decreased from 21 in 2017 to 15 in 2018, down 29%. Occupant Protection (Seat Belts) shows Ontario has a 96% seatbelt usage killed on our roads were unbelted. In 2018, 90 vehicle occupants were killed while not wearing seat belts, up from 87 in 2017, which is a 3% increase. Motorcyclists and Cyclists Motorcycle rider fatalities decreased from 69 in 2017 to 66 in 2018, down by 4%. Bicycling fatalities increased from 14 in 2017 to 23 in 2018, up 64%. Page 595 5Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Foreword Looking Ahead: Next Steps Ontario has achieved reductions in annual increases in the number of licensed drivers. evolves with growing populations, new technologies and urban and rural development. The future brings new priorities that we are committed to address. These include: drug-impaired driving as an emerging issue speeding and aggressive driving sharing the road with vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians and cyclists senior drivers and driver fitness given an aging population and health issues all-terrain vehicle safety automated vehicle safety new and emerging vehicle safety Social marketing has been an important means to educate the public and help save lives. It aims to change behaviours and attitudes, to promote safety awareness and make our streets safer. Ontario aims to be among many preventative measures, particularly education and awareness initiatives that reduce risky driving behaviour. At a Glance: Situations with the Highest Road Fatalities Category Number of Percentage of Total 134 22% 130 22% 109 18% 95 16% 90 15% 89 15% 86 14% 66 11% 28 5% 23 4% 15 2% Conclusion to be a leader in road safety. We continue to work closely with our road safety partners and support police in their of this year’s report, we will strive to achieve better results and more milestones and make Ontario’s roads the safest in the world. Page 596 6Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Foreword Key Road Safety Statistical Trends Between 1999 and 2018, the number of licensed drivers increased by 31%. In contrast, the number of fatalities decreased by 31% over this 20-year period.199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720181,000 800 600 400 200 0 YearFatalities Fatalities 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Page 597 crashes, 33,089 fewer than in 1999. dropped steadily, leading to an overall decline of 50%. 7Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Foreword 199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Year 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 20 40 60 Minor InjuriesMajor Injuries Major and Minor Injury Rate Year1999200020012002200320042005200620072008 2009201020112012201320142015201620172018 19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018Year 60 40 20 0 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018Year 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Page 598 However, the population of drivers age 65 and over has been increasing more rapidly, therefore, the casualty rate per 10,000 licensed drivers has decreased by 45%. 8Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Foreword 199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 0 10 20 30 40 Fatalities Rate Year Casualty RateYear Fatalities Fatalities Rate1999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011 20122013201420152016201720180 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Year 0 40 80 120 Fatalities Rate Casualty Rate 19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018Year 120 80 40 0 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 Rate1999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011 201220132014201520162017201840 30 20 10 0 Page 599 9Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Foreword *Number of Between 1999 and 2018, the number of large trucks registered in Ontario increased by 56%. The number of large truck fatalities decreased by 44% from 171 in 1999 to 95 in 2018. Drinking and Driving Both the number of drinking and driving fatalities and the fatality rate per 10,000 licensed drivers have declined dramatically from 1999, by 35% and 51% respectively. Fatality Rate 199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Fatalities Fatality Rate Large Truck Registrations YearFatalities in Year1999200020012002200320042005200620072008 2009201020112012201320142015201620172018350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Fatality Rate Fatalities Fatality Rate 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 250 200 150 100 50 0 Year Fatalities Fatality Rate19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012 2013201420152016201720180 50 100 150 200 250 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Fatality Fatality Rate Year1999200020012002200320042005200620072008 2009201020112012201320142015201620172018 Page 600 10Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Foreword Motorcycle registrations decreased 1.4% from 239,983 in 2017 to 236,602 in 2018. In the same time period, motorcycle rider fatalities decreased from 69 in 2017 to 66 in 2018. Over the long term, between 1999 and 2018, there has been a 30% decline in the fatality rate per 10,000 motorcycle registrations. of 32 in 2006 and a low of 9 in 2000. There were 23 bicycle rider fatalities in 2018. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fatalities Fatality Rate Year1999200020012002200320042005200620072008 2009201020112012201320142015201620172018 Motorcycle Fatalities Fatality Rate 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Year Year Fatalities Rate Fatalities 19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720186 5 4 3 2 1 0 Fatalities Serious Injuries Year 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Page 601 Between 1999 and 2018, the number of pedestrian fatalities was highest in 2016 with 136, and reached its lowest level in two decades in 2008 with 94. The number of pedestrian fatalities increased from compared with 2017. Inattentive Driving* * The number of fatalities in collisions involving an inattentive driver increased from 55 in 1999 to 86 in involving an inattentive driver increased from 11,478 in 1999 to 16,059 in 2018, an increase of 40%. 11Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Foreword 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Fatalities Serious Injuries Year1999200020012002200320042005200620072008 2009201020112012201320142015201620172018 Year1999200020012002200320042005200620072008 2009201020112012201320142015201620172018140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Fatalities 199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720180 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 Fatalities Injuries Year Year1999200020012002200320042005200620072008 2009201020112012201320142015201620172018100 80 60 40 20 0 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Fatalities Page 602 12Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 1. Overview Page 603 13Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 This section provides a synopsis of key road safety statistics such as registered vehicles. The primary measure of road user safety in Ontario is the number of fatalities for every 10,000 licensed drivers. In 2018, Ontario’s fatality rate of 0.58 per 10,000 licensed drivers continues to position Ontario as The information on hospitalizations and other statistics in this section is a stark reminder of the human and economic cost of motor vehicle collisions, both in terms of on Ontario’s health care system, which Year 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 7000070,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010 20112012201320142015201620172018Page 604 14Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Overview Synopsis 214,852 391,036 403,984 556 36,331 177,965 602 358 98 104 134 6 50,973 14,318,545 10,402,985 9,824,804 147,521 4.20 0.41 145.64 0.38 0.58 Page 605 15Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Overview 1B Health Perspective 109 571 1,028 9,822 Fracture of upper limb 377 2,080 Fracture of lower limb 1,127 11,988 5 174 80 450 2 2 736 11,672 455 4,292 46 158 8 61 45 756 2 4 1,111 15,123 5,131 57,153 Selected Procedure 84 3,448 10 83 18 122 0 0 128 1,801 6 83 47 437 1,606 19,218 3 7 57 529 3,172 31,425 5,131 57,153 Page 606 16Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 2. The People Page 607 17Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People characteristics of the road users include: driver action and condition at the time of collision, pedestrian action also provided to assist in analyzing long-term safety trends in Ontario. There was a decrease in the number of decreased from 2,152 in 2017 to 1,701 in 2018. During the same time period, the number of licensed drivers increased by 222,961, from 10,180,024 in 2017 to 10,402,985 in 2018. Out of 928 drivers involved in fatal collision, 124 were drinking drivers, 80 drivers’ ability was impaired by drugs, 82 drivers were coded as inattentive, and 105 were speeding (e.g., above speed limit or driving too fast for conditions). Despite the fact that about 96% of Ontario drivers use seat belts, 90 vehicle occupants who were fatally time of the collision. None, 43.6% Minor, 27.5% Minimal, 26.3% Fatal, 0.7% Page 608 18Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Category of Severity of Injury TotalNoneMinimalMinorMajorFatal 27,193 14,906 14,812 636 271 57,818 12,214 6,304 6,249 333 104 25,204 89 1,742 2,199 412 134 4,576 25 692 899 102 23 1,741 3 3 7 3 0 16 1 3 14 6 2 26 0 1 3 0 0 4 1 4 4 1 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 1 42 259 770 182 64 1,317 1 10 62 15 2 90 1 5 17 1 0 24 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 13 21 4 2 45 330 129 142 6 0 607 Total 39,905 24,071 25,201 1,701 602 91,480 Page 609 19Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Category Total0–4 5–9 10– 151617181920 21– 24 25– 34 35– 44 45– 54 55– 64 65– 7475+UK 00011675253745404124381271 34533122919108128152106 111001418101292523371134 000011011144244023 00000000000000000 00010000000000102 00000000000000000 00000000000000000 00000000000000000 000000016178161222064 Motorcycle 00000000100100002 00000000000000000 00000000000000000 00000000000000000 Total4565591310508479789261974602 Page 610 20Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Category Total0–45–9 10– 151617181920 21– 24 25– 34 35– 44 45– 54 55– 64 65– 7475+UK 00688451523518634 2,916 6,521 5,278 5,304 4,328 2,310 1,45225 30,354 894725 1,023272359312326304 1,096 1,866 1,205 1,280 1,231853708521 12,975 79792998280891081194207454355264883402851794,353 21716147493329271753342232121909443571,693 0121000055474002756 003311003540030023 00200000020000004 00310001310000009 00100000000000001 Motorcycle 00115814173085283200259196861521,211 Motorcycle 2031322181111171830890 000101102725400023 00000000010000001 2012115441925303619238180 Total9798221,505513952976 1,0061,120 4,717 9,800 7,3877,640 6,495 3,708 2,526827 50,973 Page 611 21Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Sex of Driver TotalFatal Male 732 40,581 188,720 230,033 Female 184 25,518 108,940 134,642 12 1,905 24,444 26,361 Total 928 68,004 322,104 391,036 September 1, 2015. Page 612 22Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People TotalFatal Normal 512 50,497 257,041 308,050 31 407 1,105 1,543 0.08 83 526 1,320 1,929 10 297 655 962 80 156 307 543 10 592 1,327 1,929 22 575 601 1,198 82 11,352 28,851 40,285 62 1,060 3,222 4,344 36 2,542 27,675 30,253 Total 928 68,004 322,104 391,036 Page 613 23Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People TotalNormal Had Been Drinking Unknown 212 1 0 0 88 10 311 16 805 8 2 1 249 20 1,085 17 3,803 8 11 3 1,110 90 5,025 18 4,676 18 21 10 1,195 79 5,999 19 5,506 38 30 12 1,307 88 6,981 20 6,214 52 56 13 1,354 120 7,809 28,713 229 314 130 5,275 469 35,130 66,735 491 635 342 10,284 1,171 79,658 56,182 268 354 192 7,700 939 65,635 56,433 202 257 129 7,213 869 65,103 44,673 141 177 92 5,884 719 51,686 22,274 58 57 28 3,712 359 26,488 11,037 23 14 8 2,721 232 14,035 787 6 1 2 1,216 24,079 26,091 Total 308,050 1,543 1,929 962 49,308 29,244 391,036 Recorded Occurrence % Normal 84 23.3 24 6.7 73 20.3 1 0.3 77 21.4 5 1.4 19 5.3 27 7.5 36 10.0 14 3.9 Total 360 Page 614 24Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People TotalFatal 422 33,371 188,482 222,275 10 6,123 28,023 34,156 55 600 1,024 1,679 50 2,708 11,162 13,920 1 33 101 135 26 3,505 9,665 13,196 40 3,099 4,635 7,774 55 7,284 14,291 21,630 12 466 2,081 2,559 133 4,965 14,723 19,821 3 52 123 178 16 1,282 9,553 10,851 94 2,852 12,640 15,586 11 1,664 25,601 27,276 Total 928 68,004 322,104 391,036 Page 615 Severity of Injury TotalFatalMajorMinorMinimal Not Injured 164 457 13,142 13,307 24,597 51,667 27 97 1,122 1,090 1,563 3,899 70 55 193 52 32 402 0 1 13 10 29 53 10 26 342 447 972 1,797 Total 271 636 14,812 14,906 27,193 57,818 Severity of Injury TotalFatalMajorMinorMinimalNot Injured 64 191 4,958 5,051 9,395 19,659 2 2 18 14 51 87 3 7 264 344 1,304 1,922 8 59 436 425 704 1,632 20 41 181 58 33 333 7 11 236 202 398 854 2 27 193 243 397 862 Total 106 338 6,286 6,337 12,282 25,349 25Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Page 616 26Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Year Incorrectly Belt Not Unknown Total 2014 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2015 6 0 0 0 1 1 8 2016 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2017 4 0 0 0 0 2 6 2018 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 Injury Level Major / Fatal %Minimal/Minor % 26.1 47.8 58.2 17.4 2.7 2.0 8.7 42.0 31.6 0.0 1.0 2.6 8.7 0.5 0.2 21.7 4.1 3.6 17.4 1.8 1.9 Total 100 100 100 Page 617 27Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Killed Injured Normal 60 3,356 6 151 14 9 0 33 10 21 0 4 5 67 28 604 11 108 0 0 Total 134 4,353 Killed Injured 26 2,272 27 574 25 242 2 166 4 119 12 91 3 49 10 232 2 40 1 54 2 183 0 6 0 43 0 15 20 267 Total 134 4,353 Page 618 28Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People 2B Year Ontario Driver Killed Injured Killed Injured Killed Injured Killed Injured Number Rate Per 100,000 Number Rate Per 100,000 19909,743,300 540 55,073 321 33,606 154 5,839 105 7,057 1,120 11.5 120,652 1,238.3 199110,084,900 542 48,021 298 30,230 157 5,352 105 6,916 1,102 10.9 101,575 1,007.2 199210,098,600 548 49,259 317 30,567 140 5,177 85 6,022 1,090 10.8 90,519 896.4 199310,813,200 595 49,628 296 30,584 146 5,181 98 5,756 1,135 10.5 91,025 841.8 199410,927,800 508 49,632 273 29,570 127 5,344 91 5,484 999 9.1 91,149 834.1 199511,100,000 527 49,916 276 29,440 126 5,261 70 4,955 999 9.0 90,030 811.1 199611,320,456 459 49,614 270 28,997 144 5,336 55 4,458 928 8.2 89,572 791.2 199711,500,329 474 47,861 224 27,915 133 5,154 68 4,597 899 7.8 88,405 768.7 199811,675,497 437 47,088 222 26,422 121 4,978 74 4,704 854 7.3 85,527 732.5 199911,513,700 452 47,943 221 26,774 132 4,894 63 4,451 868 7.5 83,192 722.5 200011,695,110 437 48,068 243 27,206 112 5,190 57 4,544 849 7.3 84,062 718.8 200111,966,960 430 45,758 224 26,510 119 5,063 72 4,451 845 7.1 85,009 710.4 200212,027,900 450 47,909 227 26,742 131 4,990 65 4,551 873 7.3 81,782 679.9 200312,293,700 425 44,212 216 24,563 120 4,758 70 10,659 831 6.8 84,192 684.8 200412,407,300 433 41,608 191 22,396 104 4,505 71 9,370 799 6.4 77,879 627.7 200512,558,669 377 41,199 183 21,268 105 4,709 101 4,674 766 6.1 73,008 581.3 200612,705,328 383 39,633 169 20,005 126 4,729 91 4,426 769 6.1 68,793 541.5 200712,803,861 396 38,913 186 19,112 108 4,636 75 4,505 765 6.0 67,166 524.6 200812,932,297 343 36,219 124 17,679 94 4,454 70 4,391 631 4.9 62,743 485.2 200913,072,700 277 35,403 113 18,224 114 4,522 60 4,413 564 4.3 62,743 480.0 201013,223,800299 35,959115 19,152954,621704,7825794.4 62,562 473.1 201113,263,500 237 35,517 92 16,835 98 4,857 71 4,810 4983.8 62,019467.6 201213,410,100 236 35,254 127 16,044 113 4,604 92 5,099 5684.2 61,001454.9 201313,551,000 246 35,163 92 15,575 100 4,290 80 4,542 5183.8 59,570439.6 201413,685,200 251 32,105 71 13,742 110 4,053 85 4,181 5173.8 54,081395.2 201513,789,600 237 32,630 91 14,465 115 4,641 88 5,023 5313.9 56,759411.6 201613,976,320 254 32,044 98 14,287 136 4,694 91 4,468 5794.1 55,493397.1 201714,072,615 316 31,045 90 13,141 114 4,317 97 3,916 6174.4 52,419372.5 201814,318,545 271 30,354 104 12,886 134 4,353 93 3,380 6024.2 50,973356.0 ** Source: StatCanPage 619 29Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Sex of Driver Total16–19 20–24 25–34 35–44 45–54 55–64 65+ Male 253,208 460,534 953,429 874,205 927,804 919,721 974,118 5,363,019 Female 227,193 398,627 894,994 870,625 893,324 861,175 894,028 5,039,966 Total 480,401 859,161 1,848,423 1,744,830 1,821,128 1,780,896 1,868,146 10,402,985 Year Total16–19 20–24 25–34 35–44 45–54 55–64 65+ 1990 322,542 629,478 1,666,474 1,467,699 964,925 728,380 669,385 6,448,883 1991 319,584 627,931 1,673,502 1,501,765 1,018,365 736,652 696,432 6,574,231 1992 314,685 623,707 1,665,433 1,528,726 1,082,883 745,759 727,568 6,688,761 1993 326,389 621,934 1,655,573 1,566,083 1,136,365 758,840 758,244 6,823,428 1994 358,817 622,704 1,645,962 1,611,972 1,190,442 770,882 783,181 6,983,960 1995 360,847 614,094 1,621,989 1,659,749 1,240,072 782,871 806,396 7,086,018 1996 361,571 612,060 1,608,567 1,717,050 1,297,289 805,486 856,144 7,258,167 1997 394,512 624,532 1,611,708 1,789,110 1,360,555 837,606 919,584 7,537,607 1998 412,589 634,053 1,593,744 1,845,474 1,415,258 872,426 954,212 7,727,756 1999 426,643 642,808 1,576,673 1,895,323 1,475,588 907,235 994,044 7,918,314 2000 438,170 659,331 1,582,207 1,935,150 1,540,499 939,838 1,026,179 8,121,374 2001 449,853 671,424 1,580,758 1,946,713 1,577,920 990,745 1,049,203 8,266,616 2002 458,627 686,561 1,580,837 1,945,944 1,612,219 1,053,877 1,075,439 8,413,504 2003 457,049 704,720 1,575,345 1,940,896 1,653,604 1,105,726 1,104,215 8,541,555 2004 453,157 719,861 1,567,346 1,929,418 1,698,350 1,157,824 1,129,641 8,655,597 2005 447,954 727,529 1,557,476 1,912,898 1,748,335 1,206,374 1,161,644 8,762,210 2006 461,058 736,575 1,550,313 1,888,582 1,793,515 1,252,613 1,185,309 8,867,965 2007 466,979 739,555 1,547,980 1,851,780 1,835,315 1,296,295 1,207,493 8,945,397 2008 478,950 744,491 1,553,552 1,808,597 1,875,742 1,339,948 1,241,006 9,042,286 2009 462,718 746,486 1,554,266 1,763,704 1,906,532 1,388,094 1,280,138 9,101,938 2010 478,342 765,075 1,572,436 1,740,128 1,927,499 1,441,906 1,319,881 9,245,267 2011 482,743 777,981 1,591,669 1,722,950 1,931,679 1,477,896 1,382,691 9,367,609 2012 481,601 790,157 1,610,128 1,710,796 1,924,202 1,509,382 1,454,653 9,480,919 2013 478,625 797,813 1,631,668 1,697,225 1,916,064 1,549,142 1,521,952 9,592,489 2014 473,531 803,311 1,656,912 1,686,188 1,903,892 1,591,871 1,588,339 9,704,044 2015 470,988 810,225 1,691,690 1,681,667 1,889,058 1,641,338 1,654,505 9,839,471 2016 468,061 821,656 1,737,393 1,691,167 1,875,312 1,688,950 1,721,205 10,003,744 2017 474,413 834,220 1,784,989 1,709,735 1,849,234 1,734,881 1,792,552 10,180,024 2018 480,401 859,161 1,848,423 1,744,830 1,821,128 1,780,896 1,868,146 10,402,985 Page 620 30Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Driver Sex Total %Male %Female % 114,644 2.14 2,424 0.05 117,068 1.13 4,853 0.09 727 0.01 5,580 0.05 2,355 0.04 186 0.00 2,541 0.02 8 0.00 3 0.00 11 0.00 152 0.00 30 0.00 182 0.00 33,555 0.63 1,115 0.02 34,670 0.33 11,808 0.22 239 0.00 12,047 0.12 153 0.00 4 0.00 157 0.00 1,525 0.03 58 0.00 1,583 0.02 25,770 0.48 223 0.00 25,993 0.25 315 0.01 1 0.00 316 0.00 3,120 0.06 53 0.00 3,173 0.03 18,208 0.34 16,829 0.33 35,037 0.34 4,691 0.09 996 0.02 5,687 0.05 20 0.00 18 0.00 38 0.00 316 0.01 192 0.00 508 0.00 C 11,475 0.21 1,866 0.04 13,341 0.13 CM 2,149 0.04 102 0.00 2,251 0.02 CM1 32 0.00 1 0.00 33 0.00 CM2 353 0.01 39 0.00 392 0.00 121,665 2.27 11,200 0.22 132,865 1.28 88 0.00 14 0.00 102 0.00 22 0.00 2 0.00 24 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.00 3,652 0.07 386 0.01 4,038 0.04 992 0.02 60 0.00 1,052 0.01 21 0.00 1 0.00 22 0.00 182 0.00 4 0.00 186 0.00 39,195 0.73 1,173 0.02 40,368 0.39 250 0.00 11 0.00 261 0.00 3,295 0.06 175 0.00 3,470 0.03 E 1,186 0.02 1,621 0.03 2,807 0.03 EM 131 0.00 29 0.00 160 0.00 EM1 2 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.00 EM2 9 0.00 2 0.00 11 0.00 F 8,160 0.15 6,001 0.12 14,161 0.14 Page 621 31Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People FM 1,255 0.02 282 0.01 1,537 0.01 FM1 21 0.00 4 0.00 25 0.00 FM2 285 0.01 102 0.00 387 0.00 G 3,803,648 70.92 4,142,565 82.19 7,946,213 76.38 G1 297,366 5.54 386,095 7.66 683,461 6.57 G1M 101 0.00 23 0.00 124 0.00 G1M1 488 0.01 80 0.00 568 0.01 G1M2 1,258 0.02 301 0.01 1,559 0.01 G2 386,796 7.21 380,888 7.56 767,684 7.38 G2M 301 0.01 63 0.00 364 0.00 G2M1 526 0.01 65 0.00 591 0.01 G2M2 3,449 0.06 464 0.01 3,913 0.04 GM 398,090 7.42 68,799 1.37 466,889 4.49 GM1 4,077 0.08 957 0.02 5,034 0.05 GM2 49,476 0.92 13,173 0.26 62,649 0.60 M 707 0.01 150 0.00 857 0.01 M1 102 0.00 16 0.00 118 0.00 M2 719 0.01 154 0.00 873 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Total 5,363,019 5,039,966 10,402,985 Driver Sex Male % Female % Total % Page 622 32Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Year 1935 707,457 10,648 560 9,839 1936 755,765 11,388 546 10,251 1937 802,765 13,906 766 12,092 1938 866,729 13,715 640 11,683 1939 899,572 13,710 652 11,638 1940 937,551 16,921 716 13,715 1941 986,773 18,167 801 14,275 1942 961,883 13,490 567 10,205 1943 919,457 11,025 549 8,628 1944 905,650 11,004 498 8,373 1945 971,852 13,458 598 9,804 1946 1,087,445 17,356 688 12,228 1947 1,144,291 22,293 734 13,056 1948 1,209,408 27,406 740 14,970 1949 1,278,584 34,472 830 17,469 1950 1,366,388 43,681 791 19,940 1951 1,461,538 54,920 949 22,557 1952 1,556,559 58,515 1,010 23,643 1953 1,656,259 65,866 1,082 24,353 1954 1,747,567 62,509 1,045 24,607 1955 1,856,845 63,219 1,111 26,246 1956 1,967,789 71,399 1,180 28,626 1957 2,088,551 76,302 1,279 30,414 1958 2,176,417 76,884 1,112 30,106 1959 2,270,246 81,518 1,187 31,602 1960 2,355,567 87,186 1,166 34,436 1961 2,414,615 85,577 1,268 37,146 1962 2,469,425 94,231 1,383 41,766 1963 2,555,015 104,919 1,421 47,801 1964 2,694,023 111,232 1,424 54,560 1965 2,739,138 128,462 1,611 60,917 1966 2,821,648 139,781 1,596 65,210 1967 3,004,654 145,008 1,719 67,280 1968 3,128,509 155,127 1,586 71,520 1969 3,247,979 169,395 1,683 74,902 1970 3,422,892 141,609 1,535 75,126 1971 3,563,197 158,831 1,769 84,650 1972 3,688,541 189,494 1,934 95,181 1973 3,841,628 193,021 1,959 97,790 Page 623 33Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Year 1974 3,972,980 204,271 1,748 98,673 1975 4,160,623 213,689 1,800 97,034 1976 4,315,925 211,865 1,511 83,736 1977 4,562,903 218,567 1,420 95,664 1978 4,725,546 186,363 1,450 94,979 1979 4,858,351 197,196 1,560 101,321 1980 4,993,531 196,501 1,508 101,367 1981 5,123,177 198,372 1,445 100,321 1982 5,247,198 187,943 1,138 92,815 1983 5,380,259 181,999 1,204 91,706 1984 5,513,911 194,782 1,132 97,230 1985 5,660,422 189,750 1,191 109,169 1986 5,817,799 187,286 1,102 108,839 1987 5,978,105 203,431 1,229 121,089 1988 6,118,112 228,398 1,237 118,158 1989 6,290,424 247,038 1,286 120,652 1990 6,448,883 220,188 1,120 101,575 1991 6,574,231 213,669 1,102 90,519 1992 6,688,761 224,249 1,090 91,025 1993 6,823,428 228,834 1,135 91,149 1994 6,983,960 226,996 999 90,030 1995 7,086,018 219,085 999 89,572 1996 7,258,167 215,024 929 88,445 1997 7,537,607 221,500 899 85,527 1998 7,727,756 213,356 854 83,192 1999 7,918,314 221,962 868 84,062 2000 8,121,374 240,630 849 85,009 2001 8,266,616 234,004 845 81,782 2002 8,413,504 244,642 873 84,192 2003 8,541,555 246,463 831 77,879 2004 8,655,597 231,548 799 73,008 2005 8,762,210 230,258 766 71,850 2006 8,867,965 216,247 769 68,793 2007 8,945,397 233,487 765 67,175 2008 9,042,286 229,196 631 62,743 2009 9,101,938 216,315 564 62,562 2010 9,245,267 215,533 579 64,514 Page 624 34Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The People Year 2011 9,367,609 177,039 498 62,019 2012 9,480,919 172,868 568 61,001 2013 9,592,489 188,999 518 59,570 2014 9,704,044 217,557 517 54,081 2015 9,839,471 221,411 531 56,759 2016 10,003,744 208,404 579 55,493 2017 10,180,024 209,085 617 52,419 2018 10,402,985 214,852 602 50,973 Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total 0 0 0 45 8 53 16 45,331 42,818 88,149 591 415 1,006 1.30 0.97 17 59,944 55,481 115,425 2,909 2,038 4,947 4.85 3.67 18 68,635 60,900 129,535 3,672 2,268 5,940 5.35 3.72 19 79,298 67,994 147,292 4,430 2,499 6,929 5.59 3.68 20 86,322 73,249 159,571 5,023 2,726 7,749 5.82 3.72 21–24 374,212 325,378 699,590 21,746 13,083 34,829 5.81 4.02 25–34 953,429 894,994 1,848,423 49,449 29,490 78,939 5.19 3.29 35–44 874,205 870,625 1,744,830 39,390 25,677 65,067 4.51 2.95 45–54 927,804 893,324 1,821,128 40,684 23,840 64,524 4.38 2.67 55–64 919,721 861,175 1,780,896 33,721 17,468 51,189 3.67 2.03 65–74 615,858 577,617 1,193,475 16,793 9,448 26,241 2.73 1.64 358,260 316,411 674,671 8,830 5,101 13,931 2.46 1.61 0 0 0 38,903 0 38,903 Total 5,363,019 5,039,966 10,402,985 266,186 134,061 400,247 Page 625 35Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 3. The Collision Page 626 36Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Collision collisions that occur on Ontario’s roads. To prevent motor vehicle collisions, in which they occur, including hour of occurrence, day, month, collision type, location, and environmental factors. Identifying these contributing factors is an important step toward reducing collisions on Ontario’s roads. The number of fatal collisions decreased from 566 in 2017 to 556 in 2018, down decreased from 37,677 in 2017 to 36,331 in 2018, down by 1,346. The number of property damage collisions for 2018 was 177,965. threshold for property-damage-only collisions has increased from $1,000 to $2,000. The fatality rate per 100 million kilometres travelled in Ontario decreased from 0.43 in 2017 to 0.41 in 2018. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018YearYear1999200020012002200320042005200620072008 20092010 201120122013201420152016201720181.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Page 627 37Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Collision Year TotalFatal 1988 1,076 76,724 150,598 228,398 1989 1,106 77,852 168,080 247,038 1990 959 65,912 153,317 220,188 1991 956 59,242 153,471 213,669 1992 942 58,889 164,418 224,249 1993 987 58,932 168,915 228,834 1994 875 58,525 167,596 226,996 1995 860 58,273 159,952 219,085 1996 816 57,791 156,417 215,024 1997 807 56,121 164,572 221,500 1998 768 55,441 157,147 213,356 1999 763 55,764 165,435 221,962 2000 737 57,279 182,614 240,630 2001 733 54,479 178,792 234,004 2002 770 56,516 187,356 244,642 2003 754 52,757 192,952 246,463 2004 718 49,948 180,882 231,548 2005 684 49,584 179,990 230,258 2006 692 47,411 168,144 216,247 2007 683 47,014 185,790 233,487 2008 574 44,219 184,403 229,196 2009 516 44,054 171,745 216,315 2010 534 44,430 170,569 215,533 2011 466 44,076 132,497 177,039 2012 505 43,484 128,879 172,868 2013 470 42,408 146,121 188,999 2014 484 38,240 178,833 217,557 2015 479 40,508 180,424 221,411 2016 527 39,685 168,192 208,404 2017 566 37,677 170,842 209,085 2018 556 36,331 177,965 214,852 Page 628 Year 1988 3.2 1989 3.2 1990 3.0 1991 2.9 1992 3.1 1993 3.0 1994 2.9 1995 2.8 1996 2.7 1997 2.7 1998 2.5 1999 2.5 2000 2.0 2001 2.0* 2002 2.0* 2003 2.1* 2004 1.9* 2005 1.8* 2006 1.66* 2007 1.87* 2008 1.84* 2009 1.72* 2010 1.66* 2011 1.39** 2012 1.36** 2013 1.43** 2014 1.61** 2015 1.59** 2016 1.48** 2017 1.45* 2018 1.46* TotalFatal Injury Damage 586 54,786 278,914 334,286 12 500 12,502 13,014 126 4,011 178 4,315 24 1,709 434 2,167 1 6 15 22 Street Car 0 17 21 38 1 26 92 119 0 22 611 633 4 329 11,721 12,054 6 436 740 1,182 Sub-total 760 61,842 305,228 367,830 4 51 408 463 6 358 1,682 2,046 6 215 1,002 1,223 7 408 1,750 2,165 3 128 1,203 1,334 0 29 269 298 1 31 57 89 2 18 94 114 2 29 71 102 38Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Collision Year Year Page 629 39Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Collision TotalFatalInjury Damage 0 37 287 324 10 478 1,592 2,080 Curb 3 268 1,098 1,369 0 42 47 89 1 32 171 204 0 1 5 6 0 5 65 70 5 195 654 854 4 84 818 906 Sub-total 54 2,409 11,273 13,736 70 1,642 4,846 6,558 46 1,930 8,580 10,556 0 17 142 159 0 4 72 76 0 1 86 87 1 2 3 6 4 183 343 530 0 99 1,193 1,292 0 103 1,218 1,321 13 506 1,314 1,833 Sub-total 134 4,487 17,797 22,418 Total 948 68,738 334,298 403,984 TotalFatal 104 958 1,649 2,711 58 4,426 11,388 15,872 40 9,645 53,166 62,851 20 2,047 25,506 27,573 54 8,279 33,363 41,696 8 352 10,512 10,872 272 10,442 37,734 48,448 0 182 4,647 4,829 0 0 0 0 Total 556 36,331 177,965 214,852 Page 630 40Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Collision 3B Time and Environment Occurrence Total %Fatal %%% January 48 8.6 3,064 8.4 18,140 10.2 21,252 February 33 5.9 2,478 6.8 14,336 8.1 16,847 31 5.6 2,401 6.6 12,246 6.9 14,678 32 5.8 2,507 6.9 13,304 7.5 15,843 May 46 8.3 3,026 8.3 13,687 7.7 16,759 June 50 9.0 3,262 9.0 13,972 7.9 17,284 July 47 8.5 3,347 9.2 13,602 7.6 16,996 59 10.6 3,184 8.8 13,191 7.4 16,434 September 54 9.7 3,313 9.1 13,707 7.7 17,074 58 10.4 3,376 9.3 16,077 9.0 19,511 62 11.2 3,533 9.7 19,600 11.0 23,195 36 6.5 2,840 7.8 16,103 9.0 18,979 Total 556 36,331 177,965 214,852 Day of Occurrence Total %Fatal %%% 82 14.7 5,096 14.0 24,933 14.0 30,111 89 16.0 5,446 15.0 27,537 15.5 33,072 74 13.3 5,458 15.0 27,084 15.2 32,616 75 13.5 5,719 15.7 28,649 16.1 34,443 92 16.5 6,117 16.8 30,704 17.3 36,913 83 14.9 4,632 12.7 21,803 12.3 26,518 61 11.0 3,863 10.6 17,255 9.7 21,179 Total 556 36,331 177,965 214,852 Occurrence Page 631 41Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Collision Hour of Total %Fatal %% Damage % 12 to 1 a.m.19 3.4 554 1.5 2,709 1.5 3,282 1 to 2 a.m.15 2.7 400 1.1 1,897 1.1 2,312 2 to 3 a.m.14 2.5 316 0.9 1,693 1.0 2,023 3 to 4 a.m.13 2.3 275 0.8 1,465 0.8 1,753 4 to 5 a.m.9 1.6 248 0.7 1,270 0.7 1,527 5 to 6 a.m.18 3.2 435 1.2 2,372 1.3 2,825 Sub-total 88 2,228 11,406 13,722 6 to 7 a.m.32 5.8 977 2.7 5,215 2.9 6,224 7 to 8 a.m.17 3.1 1,563 4.3 7,620 4.3 9,200 8 to 9 a.m.22 4.0 1,984 5.5 10,889 6.1 12,895 9 to 10 a.m.20 3.6 1,696 4.7 8,828 5.0 10,544 10 to 11 a.m.19 3.4 1,673 4.6 8,028 4.5 9,720 11 to 12 noon 24 4.3 1,949 5.4 8,998 5.1 10,971 Sub-total 134 9,842 49,578 59,554 Hour of 12 to 1 p.m.27 4.9 2,150 5.9 10,240 5.8 12,417 1 to 2 p.m.27 4.9 2,157 5.9 9,977 5.6 12,161 2 to 3 p.m.24 4.3 2,403 6.6 11,475 6.4 13,902 3 to 4 p.m.28 5.0 2,898 8.0 13,989 7.9 16,915 4 to 5 p.m.27 4.9 2,906 8.0 15,149 8.5 18,082 5 to 6 p.m.32 5.8 3,069 8.4 15,898 8.9 18,999 Sub-total 165 15,583 76,728 92,476 6 to 7 p.m.37 6.7 2,410 6.6 11,862 6.7 14,309 7 to 8 p.m.30 5.4 1,898 5.2 8,246 4.6 10,174 8 to 9 p.m.26 4.7 1,386 3.8 6,438 3.6 7,850 9 to 10 p.m.30 5.4 1,298 3.6 5,583 3.1 6,911 10 to 11 p.m.24 4.3 949 2.6 4,542 2.6 5,515 22 4.0 737 2.0 3,582 2.0 4,341 Sub-total 169 8,678 40,253 49,100 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Total 556 36,331 177,965 214,852 Page 632 42Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Collision Statutory Number of Fatal Total Killed Injured Killed Injured Killed Injured Killed Injured 3 2 5 2 4 0 0 4 9 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 9 7 2 2 8 0 0 9 10 10 6 7 4 6 2 0 12 13 7 5 2 1 0 1 0 7 2 8 7 2 4 1 1 0 12 3 4 2 1 2 2 1 0 5 3 Total % Fatal %% Damage % 287 51.6 25,901 71.3 127,174 71.5 153,362 16 2.9 600 1.7 3,398 1.9 4,014 15 2.7 1,132 3.1 5,479 3.1 6,626 237 42.6 8,688 23.9 41,757 23.5 50,682 1 0.2 10 0.0 157 0.1 168 Total 556 36,331 177,965 214,852 Total % Fatal %% Damage % Clear 457 82.2 29,337 80.7 141,653 79.6 171,447 Rain 50 9.0 3,831 10.5 15,653 8.8 19,534 Snow 34 6.1 2,217 6.1 15,563 8.7 17,814 1 0.2 378 1.0 2,294 1.3 2,673 2 0.4 167 0.5 777 0.4 946 2 0.4 91 0.3 525 0.3 618 6 1.1 221 0.6 1,033 0.6 1,260 4 0.7 89 0.2 467 0.3 560 Total 556 36,331 177,965 214,852 Page 633 43Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Collision TotalFatal 227 21,455 101,648 123,330 140 6,238 35,535 41,913 40 1,199 6,117 7,356 74 1,545 7,441 9,060 72 5,802 26,836 32,710 3 83 332 418 0 9 56 65 Total 556 36,331 177,965 214,852 Road Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Municipal 137,616 137,548 100,183 97,951 106,385 129,316 134,198 123,544 121,796 123,330 35,800 33,816 36,857 34,411 39,500 39,978 38,872 38,174 39,781 41,913 7,295 6,665 6,358 6,296 6,442 6,128 6,182 6,788 6,933 7,356 County or 11,444 11,638 11,852 11,178 11,524 12,066 9,918 9,447 9,171 9,060 Municipality 23,622 25,360 21,318 22,562 24,677 29,470 31,600 29,926 30,892 32,710 426 415 385 393 395 490 530 447 415 418 112 91 86 77 76 109 111 78 97 65 Total 216,315 215,533 177,039 172,868 188,999 217,557 221,411 208,404 209,085 214,852 Page 634 44Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Collision Total % Fatal % Injury % Damage % 351 63.1 14,492 39.9 93,195 52.4 108,038 74 13.3 8,310 22.9 37,108 20.9 45,492 99 17.8 10,869 29.9 32,073 18.0 43,041 25 4.5 2,465 6.8 14,508 8.2 16,998 1 0.2 35 0.1 218 0.1 254 1 0.2 19 0.1 68 0.0 88 3 0.5 74 0.2 341 0.2 418 2 0.4 67 0.2 454 0.3 523 Total 556 36,331 177,965 214,852 Road Surface Total % Fatal % Injury % Damage % 410 73.7 26,184 72.1 125,101 70.3 151,695 98 17.6 6,715 18.5 28,601 16.1 35,414 16 2.9 1,112 3.1 8,214 4.6 9,342 5 0.9 591 1.6 3,945 2.2 4,541 9 1.6 526 1.4 4,425 2.5 4,960 14 2.5 1,036 2.9 6,924 3.9 7,974 0 0.0 2 0.0 29 0.0 31 1 0.2 91 0.3 267 0.2 359 0 0.0 11 0.0 12 0.0 23 3 0.5 63 0.2 447 0.3 513 Total 556 36,331 177,965 214,852 Page 635 45Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 4. Place of Collision Page 636 46Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 collisions in Ontario and provides a breakdown of the various classes of collision, the number of persons killed or registrations by municipality and county. The location of collisions provides vital information to MTO and local road authorities about the safety of Ontario’s roads and highways. the years may help to highlight trends in road safety over time. This information helps MTO and local authorities to prioritize activities, and education campaigns. of municipalities due to amalgamation statistics found in Table 4.1 may not be comparable from year to year. Information about population numbers by Ontario’s municipalities can be found at the Statistics statcan.gc.ca. These comparison purpose. Page 637 47Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 214,847 556 36,331 177,960 602 50,973 19 0 7 12 0 11 57 1 5 51 1 6 6 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 Sault Ste. Marie C 982 4 178 800 4 280 310 4 43 263 7 79 85 1 10 74 1 10 1,465 10 243 1,212 13 386 124,723 Brant 1,624 3 257 1,364 3 338 242 2 48 192 2 70 557 8 108 441 8 162 Brant Total 2,423 13 413 1,997 13 570 112,444 Bruce 80 1 6 73 1 11 214 1 35 178 1 54 60 0 7 53 0 14 127 0 18 109 0 22 195 1 25 169 1 32 83 0 13 70 0 30 229 0 39 190 0 75 154 0 19 135 0 23 Bruce Total 1,142 3 162 977 3 261 79,095 177 2 41 134 2 55 1,382 3 262 1,117 3 377 1,559 5 303 1,251 5 432 95,921 11 0 0 11 0 0 40 0 3 37 0 3 42 0 3 39 0 4 20 0 4 16 0 4 Page 638 48Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 79 0 10 69 0 11 571 0 97 474 0 135 203 2 36 165 2 55 6 0 2 4 0 2 972 2 155 815 2 214 94,548 89 0 20 69 0 31 92 0 17 75 0 22 31 0 8 23 0 10 87 0 19 68 0 26 138 1 34 103 1 49 115 0 20 95 0 28 306 0 39 267 0 57 75 0 9 66 0 11 211 1 50 160 2 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,144 2 216 926 3 311 60,560 1,088 2 298 788 2 421 135 3 21 111 3 38 669 2,116 2 5 166 485 501 1,626 2 5 235 680 880 3 237 640 4 339 240 2 60 178 3 88 237 4 51 182 4 73 1,329 0 285 1,044 0 389 2,267 6 359 1,902 11 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,961 27 1,962 6,972 34 2,817 504,023 Elgin 88 0 10 78 0 15 80 0 14 66 0 19 164 2 28 134 2 37 Page 639 49Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 54 0 10 44 0 14 110 1 20 89 1 31 74 0 13 61 0 19 324 0 57 267 0 73 53 0 4 49 0 5 159 3 26 130 3 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elgin Total 1,106 6 182 918 6 252 87,703 212 1 31 180 1 45 147 0 27 120 0 38 193 1 24 168 1 36 369 6 60 303 8 87 215 0 40 175 0 54 277 1 42 234 1 58 232 1 31 200 1 37 4,252 6 1,479 2,767 6 1,970 357 0 62 295 0 99 2 0 1 1 0 1 6,256 16 1,797 4,443 18 2,425 306,168 Frontenac 95 0 14 81 0 19 15 0 0 15 0 0 1,764 5 324 1,435 5 428 23 0 5 18 0 6 259 0 41 218 0 57 317 3 44 270 4 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 Frontenac Total 2,473 8 428 2,037 9 582 124,810 74 1 9 64 1 12 125 0 22 103 0 32 191 0 33 158 0 47 96 0 13 83 0 15 Page 640 50Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 120 0 16 104 0 18 319 0 40 279 0 52 86 1 18 67 1 24 100 0 13 87 0 18 285 0 35 250 0 49 366 4 72 290 4 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,762 6 271 1,485 6 392 88,796 Haldimand-Norfolk 243 7 64 172 8 125 1,224 11 211 1,002 12 326 Haldimand-Norfolk Total 1,467 18 275 1,174 20 451 114,607 Haliburton 10 0 1 9 0 1 107 1 14 92 1 16 49 0 8 41 0 9 105 0 14 91 0 19 176 0 25 151 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 Haliburton Total 447 1 62 384 1 78 26,851 Halton 1929 4 288 1637 4 396 633 0 101 532 0 135 1397 4 235 1158 4 328 1891 4 254 1633 4 324 2937 2 317 2618 2 488 0 0 0 0 0 0 Halton Total 8,787 14 1,195 7,578 14 1,671 424,001 Hamilton 7527 11 1385 6131 11 1943 1349 0 155 1194 0 226 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hamilton Total 8,876 11 1,540 7,325 11 2,169 359,553 Page 641 51Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 41 0 3 38 0 3 759 1 134 624 1 185 24 0 2 22 0 2 8 0 2 6 0 3 20 0 1 19 0 1 53 0 8 45 0 12 10 0 0 10 0 0 34 1 2 31 1 3 44 0 7 37 0 8 68 0 4 64 0 4 118 1 23 94 1 41 559 4 72 483 4 113 544 4 74 466 4 98 2,282 11 332 1,939 11 473 138,345 Huron 78 0 8 70 0 13 60 0 12 48 0 17 105 1 15 89 2 19 72 0 10 62 0 12 62 0 2 60 0 2 90 1 11 78 1 15 73 1 7 65 1 13 58 0 2 56 0 4 71 2 16 53 2 23 154 1 18 135 1 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 Huron Total 823 6 101 716 7 148 59,241 972 3 193 776 3 280 261 2 46 213 2 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,233 5 239 989 5 361 81,225 Page 642 52Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured Kenora 113 0 11 102 0 11 216 0 11 205 0 12 20 0 1 19 0 1 34 0 4 30 0 5 430 5 41 384 7 66 69 0 10 59 0 11 Kenora Total 882 5 78 799 7 106 59,803 Lambton 53 0 5 48 0 5 41 0 1 40 0 1 53 0 4 49 0 7 35 0 6 29 0 6 67 1 17 49 1 30 28 0 2 26 0 2 Sarnia C 869 1 127 741 1 179 134 3 13 118 4 16 43 1 6 36 1 6 185 0 21 164 0 25 77 2 16 59 2 25 Lambton Total 1,585 8 218 1,359 9 302 108,307 Lanark 57 0 10 47 0 15 86 0 20 66 0 26 105 1 11 93 1 13 150 0 21 129 0 27 41 0 4 37 0 4 87 0 14 73 0 17 158 0 16 142 0 24 62 1 8 53 1 12 173 1 37 135 1 58 77 0 13 64 0 19 Lanark Total 996 3 154 839 3 215 70,738 Page 643 53Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 31 0 4 27 0 5 85 0 12 73 0 18 302 0 47 255 0 61 72 1 14 57 1 20 110 0 18 92 0 24 19 0 1 18 0 1 71 0 6 65 0 8 89 0 20 69 0 23 42 0 6 36 0 7 184 0 27 157 0 42 39 0 6 33 0 7 136 1 17 118 1 27 453 4 57 392 6 127 9 0 0 9 0 0 1,642 6 235 1,401 8 370 100,501 12 0 1 11 0 1 196 0 42 154 0 52 143 2 27 114 3 38 97 0 6 91 0 6 246 4 35 207 4 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 694 6 111 577 7 152 40,057 Manitoulin Central Manitoulin M 10 0 1 9 0 1 186 0 19 167 0 26 99 1 14 84 1 18 Manitoulin Total 295 1 34 260 1 45 17,528 125 0 22 103 0 33 7,416 10 784 6,622 10 1,119 45 1 15 29 1 23 339 3 46 290 3 93 124 1 21 102 1 30 Page 644 54Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 132 1 22 109 1 34 278 1 46 231 1 64 537 0 65 472 0 85 261 1 54 206 1 67 9,257 18 1,075 8,164 18 1,548 338,370 156 0 14 142 0 16 12 0 1 11 0 1 87 0 9 78 0 11 228 1 22 205 1 29 27 0 5 22 0 5 139 0 16 123 0 20 383 3 29 351 4 40 5 0 1 4 0 1 1,037 4 97 936 5 123 74,490 Niagara 263 1 33 229 1 45 160 1 22 137 1 32 193 0 19 174 0 25 1,194 1 149 1,044 1 187 227 1 38 188 1 55 151 0 27 124 0 36 Port Colborne C 146 0 25 121 0 30 1,500 5 167 1,328 5 224 235 1 21 213 1 32 33 0 6 27 0 8 581 2 53 526 2 66 142 0 31 111 0 48 1,425 5 163 1,257 5 247 0 0 0 0 0 0 Niagara Total 6,250 17 754 5,479 17 1,035 372,475 3 0 0 3 0 0 30 0 3 27 0 11 8 0 1 7 0 1 689 2 116 571 2 151 Page 645 55Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 75 0 10 65 0 11 567 5 81 481 8 118 43 0 2 41 0 2 1,415 7 213 1,195 10 294 93,557 95 0 19 76 0 24 82 1 15 66 1 19 221 0 21 200 0 27 47 1 10 36 1 15 101 0 21 80 0 29 159 2 26 131 2 41 157 2 23 132 2 32 347 1 48 298 1 71 15 1 4 10 1 6 1,224 8 187 1,029 8 264 89,666 12,217 21 2,396 9,800 22 3,142 1,678 2 205 1,471 2 271 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,895 23 2,601 11,271 24 3,413 607,562 Oxford 96 0 15 81 0 21 100 0 13 87 0 15 180 0 26 154 0 42 140 0 19 121 0 28 624 2 96 526 2 136 189 3 34 152 3 57 402 0 54 348 0 73 235 2 40 193 2 63 Oxford Total 1,966 7 297 1,662 7 435 106,804 Parry Sound 8 0 1 7 0 1 28 0 10 18 0 11 5 0 0 5 0 0 115 0 14 101 0 15 9 0 3 6 0 4 Page 646 56Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 20 0 1 19 0 1 647 3 91 553 5 121 162 2 19 141 3 31 Parry Sound Total 994 5 139 850 8 184 64,761 Peel 7,646 21 1,081 6,544 24 1,474 1,027 2 184 841 2 282 7,544 12 845 6,687 13 1,052 4,749 8 701 4,040 8 1,005 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel Total 20,966 43 2,811 18,112 47 3,813 903,686 156 0 28 128 0 38 211 1 34 176 1 49 108 2 17 89 3 33 46 0 9 37 0 9 454 2 62 390 2 97 89 3 11 75 3 18 194 4 30 160 4 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,258 12 191 1,055 13 295 67,855 42 0 13 29 0 17 78 0 15 63 0 22 93 1 11 81 1 12 81 0 9 72 0 9 57 0 2 55 0 2 27 1 4 22 1 7 71 0 14 57 0 19 1,308 0 221 1,087 0 310 Page 647 57Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 177 2 28 147 3 50 308 1 56 251 1 89 2 0 1 1 0 1 2,244 5 374 1,865 6 538 130,246 118 0 22 96 0 28 32 0 3 29 0 3 239 0 32 207 0 39 53 3 12 38 3 21 153 0 21 132 0 28 116 1 24 91 1 37 135 0 29 106 0 43 150 0 26 124 0 66 75 1 22 52 1 27 1,071 5 191 875 5 292 100,993 Prince Edward 47 1 7 39 1 9 285 1 32 252 1 37 Prince Edward Total 332 2 39 291 2 46 26,558 Rainy River 13 0 0 13 0 0 115 0 11 104 0 13 165 0 14 151 0 19 54 0 2 52 0 3 Rainy River Total 347 0 27 320 0 35 25,636 Renfrew 30 0 5 25 0 6 67 0 6 61 0 8 36 0 6 30 0 6 28 0 2 26 0 2 15 0 1 14 0 1 49 0 7 42 0 8 37 0 5 32 0 9 Page 648 58Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 8 0 3 5 0 3 117 0 21 96 0 25 47 1 4 42 1 9 61 0 8 53 0 8 43 0 4 39 0 6 187 0 31 156 0 37 113 0 12 101 0 15 50 0 6 44 0 11 62 0 8 54 0 8 474 5 76 393 5 130 47 1 3 43 1 5 Renfrew Total 1,471 7 208 1,256 7 297 112,034 Simcoe 153 1 22 130 1 29 2,349 6 296 2,047 6 430 465 4 51 410 4 78 293 2 35 256 2 65 243 0 28 215 0 47 295 0 59 236 0 84 487 2 96 389 2 132 243 0 40 203 0 56 354 0 63 291 0 93 439 2 69 368 2 81 163 2 21 140 2 40 56 0 5 51 0 5 87 0 22 65 0 26 129 1 21 107 1 29 52 0 11 41 0 14 115 1 21 93 1 26 234 1 26 207 1 40 1,805 7 283 1,515 8 451 314 6 54 254 6 86 Simcoe Total 8,276 35 1,223 7,018 36 1,812 451,007 Page 649 59Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured Cornwall C 737 0 106 631 0 136 110 0 20 90 0 27 151 1 22 128 1 28 69 1 7 61 1 9 85 0 16 69 0 23 87 1 11 75 1 15 92 0 17 75 0 21 272 2 44 226 2 71 2 0 1 1 0 1 1,605 5 244 1,356 5 331 103,818 Sudbury 9 0 0 9 0 0 25 0 4 21 0 6 7 0 0 7 0 0 2,661 6 442 2,213 6 626 4 0 0 4 0 0 565 5 93 467 6 140 35 1 0 34 1 1 Sudbury Total 3,306 12 539 2,755 13 773 202,394 17 0 1 16 0 1 5 0 1 4 0 1 11 0 0 11 0 0 5 0 1 4 0 1 37 0 0 37 0 0 43 0 8 35 0 11 30 0 3 27 0 3 5 0 0 5 0 0 1,852 3 252 1,597 3 348 1,485 11 204 1,270 12 302 125 0 7 118 0 11 3,615 14 477 3,124 15 678 152,640 Page 650 60Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured 7 0 0 7 0 0 87 0 18 69 0 20 90 1 11 78 2 12 218 3 44 171 3 62 41 0 6 35 0 7 443 4 79 360 5 101 41,851 Toronto 39,473 65 6,808 32,600 65 9,464 8,404 6 1,484 6,914 7 2,186 0 0 0 0 0 0 Toronto Total 47,877 71 8,292 39,514 72 11,650 1,307,215 Waterloo 2,017 1 473 1,543 1 632 3,621 2 773 2,846 2 1,048 207 1 56 150 1 85 1,729 2 356 1,371 2 489 89 1 22 66 1 27 217 0 60 157 0 96 424 1 103 320 1 149 1,581 1 253 1,327 1 361 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waterloo Total 9,885 9 2,096 7,780 9 2,887 405,889 Wellington 350 2 52 296 2 78 118 0 20 98 0 28 1,723 2 286 1,435 2 398 259 4 45 210 6 72 135 4 20 111 4 40 87 1 14 72 1 29 180 0 28 152 0 33 136 0 18 118 0 34 701 2 107 592 2 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wellington Total 3,689 15 590 3,084 17 870 185,932 Page 651 61Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Place of Collision Total Fatal Injury Damage Killed Injured York 449 0 92 357 0 135 330 1 85 244 1 128 296 0 61 235 0 82 426 4 89 333 5 150 2,685 6 685 1,994 6 935 620 2 133 485 2 169 1,644 4 462 1,178 4 643 3,756 7 842 2,907 7 1,162 326 3 79 244 3 119 2,619 8 353 2,258 9 553 1 0 0 1 0 0 York Total 13,152 35 2,881 10,236 37 4,076 815,122 Page 652 62Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 5. The Vehicle Page 653 Other 1.0% Motorized Snow Vehicle 2.9% 5.0% Motorcycle 2.4% vehicles involved in motor vehicle collisions in Ontario. In 2018, passenger vehicles made up about they also represented 78% of all vehicles involved in collisions. in collisions had apparent mechanical defects. 63Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Passenger 73.5% Page 654 64Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Vehicle TotalFatal 549 51,709 248,551 300,809 40 2,988 12,110 15,138 69 1,312 612 1,993 114 6,063 32,583 38,760 16 778 4,254 5,048 1 126 565 692 107 2,166 12,944 15,217 9 649 2,522 3,180 6 176 1,036 1,218 2 26 39 67 Snowmobile 0 10 18 28 Snow Plow 0 40 363 403 3 213 1,269 1,485 1 51 172 224 0 26 170 196 1 8 68 77 1 7 18 26 Street Car 2 71 47 120 24 1,819 489 2,332 1 54 160 215 0 133 1,139 1,272 2 313 15,169 15,484 Total 948 68,738 334,298 403,984 Page 655 65Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Vehicle TotalFatal Damage 873 65,467 303,328 369,668 1 61 208 270 0 15 63 78 2 46 208 256 4 54 129 187 1 19 93 113 0 6 43 49 1 10 70 81 0 33 197 230 0 11 38 49 0 2 22 24 8 237 1,660 1,905 58 2,777 28,239 31,074 Total 948 68,738 334,298 403,984 TotalFatal Damage 2019 2 299 1,736 2,037 2018 48 3,793 21,190 25,031 2017 80 5,672 31,968 37,720 2016 58 5,158 28,063 33,279 2015 59 4,968 24,383 29,410 2014 47 4,384 21,892 26,323 2013 59 4,457 21,590 26,106 2012 43 4,164 19,416 23,623 2011 33 3,599 17,787 21,419 2010 41 3,850 18,917 22,808 449 25,222 108,505 134,176 29 3,172 18,851 22,052 Total 948 68,738 334,298 403,984 Page 656 TotalFatal 897 66,470 312,231 379,598 29 681 1,674 2,384 22 1,587 20,393 22,002 Total 948 68,738 334,298 403,984 5B 7,397,114 Motorcycle 236,602 517 Commercial*1,537,352 22,637 12,033 294,836 507,718 0 2,757 60,402 Total 10,071,968 66Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Vehicle Page 657 67Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 The Vehicle Model Year Total2019201820172016201520142013201220112010 2009 and earlier 113,630 601,589 631,340 563,730 561,388 500,814 506,066 455,705 409,909 459,142 2,593,8017,397,114 Motorcycle4607,1669,0769,1869,8139,7499,6838,9128,1917,724156,642236,602 0202114408495517 Commercial*27,313 154,886 152,219 130,10299,46089,32475,75174,16486,68480,925629,6831,600,511 1,4912,4482,8922,4602,0662,1842,7342,4512,1132,26611,56534,670 4,2097,8898,0709,7487,7225,6244,9945,2375,2695,526230,548294,836 2,21518,52020,53719,66115,40018,37816,74715,73015,28110,245355,004507,718 Total149,318 792,500 824,134 734,889 695,850 626,074 615,979 562,203 527,447 565,836 3,977,738 10,071,968 Damage TotalFatal Injury Damage None605,46912,49718,026 9316,383131,040147,516 13720,125120,180140,442 16915,95532,07648,200 4597,4416,99214,892 303,36531,51334,908 Total94868,738334,298403,984 Page 658 68Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 6. Special Vehicles Page 659 69Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 special interest, including motorcycles, school buses, large trucks, bicycles. The ministry is continuously monitoring the safety of special vehicle types as many vehicles and snowmobiles. The safety of other vehicle types such as bicycles, motorcycles, school buses or large trucks is always in the centre of public scrutiny. Motorcycles Year Killed Injured Killed Injured 2009 38 1,236 1 425 2010 45 1,230 2 462 2011 36 1,326 2 478 2012 54 1,338 1 478 2013 47 1,250 3 431 2014 56 1,177 5 313 2015 57 1,583 6 159 2016 60 1,498 5 156 2017 65 1,372 4 141 2018 64 1,211 2 89 % 6.9 10.6 19.0 12.7 5.0 8.0 Motorcycle Driver Error 28.8 36.4 40.3 Weekend 37.3 Page 660 70Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Special Vehicles 6B School Vehicles Total Number of 834,228 1,445 837,173 1,293 828,508 1,037 836,032 1,064 850,747 1,075 Total Number Five-Year Total (2013/2014– Fatal Injury Damage 3 40 90 866 999 5,513 0 0 0 16 16 89 0 3 7 40 50 274 Total 3 43 97 922 1,065 5,876 Total Five-Year Total (2013/2014– Killed Injured Killed Injured Killed Injured Killed Injured Killed Injured 0 0 0 60 0 1 0 61 0 363 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total 0 0 0 64 0 1 0 65 0 385 Page 661 71Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Special Vehicles Year 2014 36 33.0 109 2015 31 32.6 95 2016 37 32.7 113 2017 46 32.6 141 2018 35 36.8 95 Total 185 553 TotalFatal 37 922 5,687 6,646 8 115 581 704 2 163 1,582 1,747 49 820 4,195 5,064 5 15 110 130 2 23 148 173 5 234 1,206 1,445 Total 108 2,292 13,509 15,909 Driver Licence Required G 1,383,503 45,026 250,854** Total 1,679,383 % 0 65 21 86 72 5 Page 662 72Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Special Vehicles 6D * Killed Injured 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 8 10 15 8 9 106 86 91 117 127 3 8 15 13 6 106 123 125 116 147 Total 11 18 30 21 15 212 209 216 233 274 * Killed Injured 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 0 0 0 1 2 63 63 47 42 44 0 1 1 1 2 51 83 72 54 49 Total 0 1 1 2 4 114 146 119 96 93 * Killed Injured 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 4 1 3 Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 13 4 3 Page 663 73Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Year 2014 423,822 2015 442,499 2016 462,636 2017 485,596 2018 507,718 % 38 22 22 36 76 16 1 82 6E * Killed Injured 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 9 3 1 7 2 61 26 19 31 34 10 14 10 19 16 122 107 90 112 117 Total 19 17 11 26 18 183 133 109 143 151 Special Vehicles Page 664 74Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Special Vehicles Killed Injured 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 1 0 0 0 0 27 5 2 10 3 1 1 1 2 0 71 16 12 14 12 Total 2 1 1 2 0 98 21 14 24 15 Killed Injured 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 4 2 3 2 Total 2 0 1 0 0 6 8 2 6 2 Year 2014 308,578 2015 306,509 2016 304,590 2017 309,199 2018 294,836 % 7 20 12 51 Page 665 75Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Special Vehicles 6F Bicycles Year Killed Injured Killed Injured 2014 16 1,785 0 288 2015 20 2,295 0 138 2016 19 2,302 0 99 2017 14 1,932 0 61 2018 23 1,693 0 56 Total0–5 6–15 16–30 31–60 61+Unknown 3 206 553 710 219 175 1,866 0 1 11 16 3 2 33 0 13 24 22 6 8 73 0 13 136 153 15 32 349 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 3 234 724 901 243 217 2,322 % 55 45 67 86 2 90 92 19 Page 666 76Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 7. Conviction, Suspension Page 667 77Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 This section presents conviction, to motor vehicle use in Ontario. legislation and conviction type. In 2018, nearly 90% of motor vehicle convictions were related to remain). In the last decade, the number of 12,500 occurrences annually. Others, 0.5% Page 668 78Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Number 872,114 6,456 14,858 3 66,080 1,560 1,229 26,126 2,045 Total 990,471 Number 47,458 172,979 14683 56,104 431,986 128,370 8,299 12,235 Total 872,114 Page 669 79Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Number 11,745 16 341 483 1,801 1,202 0 Total 15,588 7B 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Criminal 9 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 Fail to Remain 420 353 185 222 164 144 144 151 144 967 856 566 513 453 464 479 540 557 6,540 5,710 4,222 3,892 3,413 3,422 3,387 3359 3229 6,070 6,117 4,942 4,367 4,382 4,171 3,955 3905 3893 1,138 934 598 530 472 426 423 419 380 2,163 2,138 1,291 1,222 1,085 1,043 1,053 980 996 Motor 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 417 341 283 248 232 245 230 295 0 Total 17,725 16,453 12,089 10,997 10,201 9,915 9,671 9,649 9,199 Page 670 80Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 January 1,368 1,298 1,154 1,071 994 911 996 1,017 990 912 February 1,401 1,140 1,219 1,230 1,028 895 1,039 1,009 1,009 965 1,502 1,252 1,332 1,236 1,339 1,104 1,199 1,060 1,076 1,062 1,391 1,363 1,304 1,284 1,117 1,078 1,124 1,130 1,152 979 May 1,533 1,486 1,342 1,212 1,233 1,244 1,221 1,212 989 1,072 June 1,373 1,296 1,360 1,265 1,273 1,149 1,146 1,150 1,044 1,109 July 1,489 1,454 1,475 1,338 1,175 1,156 1,319 1,181 1,219 1,139 1,482 1,400 1,281 1,393 1,235 1,354 1,190 1,171 1,129 1,072 September 1,458 1,360 1,303 1,359 1,179 1,061 1,073 1,034 1,059 1,044 1,412 1,416 1,354 1,285 1,173 1,154 1,201 1,144 1,043 1,002 1,656 1,344 1,313 1,314 1,155 1,237 1,199 1,104 1,056 1,017 1,374 1,411 1,467 1,523 1,174 1,302 1,227 1,240 1,271 1,239 Total 17,439 16,220 15,904 15,510 14,075 13,645 13,934 13,452 13,037 12,612 Suspension Data Novice Second Regular Second 16 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 18 4 1 0 0 19 16 5 2 0 20–24 84 25 90 4 25–34 79 21 224 10 35–44 35 8 110 7 45–54 20 6 64 0 55–64 11 3 25 2 65–74 1 0 7 1 75 +0 0 3 0 Total 250 69 525 24 Page 671 8A Glossary Ability-Impaired Alcohol: Ability-Impaired—Alcohol over 0.08: of 80 milligrams per 100 millilitres of blood. This program, designed to reduce drinking and driving, started November 29, 1996. the immediate suspension of a driver’s licence for 90 days upon evidence gathered blood, or (b) the driver failed or refused to provide a breath or blood sample. Alcohol Involved: This category includes drivers reported must have a zero blood-alcohol concentration less than 0.05; must have the accompanying driver as the unless accompanied by a licensed driving instructor, must not drive on Ontario’s must ensure the number of passengers in the vehicle is limited to the number of midnight and 5 a.m.; months. It can be reduced to eight months by successfully completing an approved driver education course. For information about approved courses, call ServiceOntario licence period, drivers must pass a road test must have a zero blood-alcohol road; must ensure the number of passengers in the vehicle is limited to the number of 19 and under cannot carry more than one midnight and 5 a.m. 81Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 8A Page 672 82Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Appendix 19 and under cannot carry more than three midnight and 5 a.m.* full licence privileges. licence: may operate a motorcycle, limited-speed motorcycle (motor scooter) or motor- assisted bicycle (moped) for the purposes of training; must have a zero blood-alcohol content hours (one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset); 17, 61, 69, 71, 101, 102, 144, 655; must not carry passengers. The M1 licence period lasts at least 60 days, and the licence is valid for 90 days. M1 drivers must pass the M1 road test before proceeding to the M2 licence period. may take an approved motorcycle or motor scooter safety course that includes a road test, instead of the ministry road test. licence: must have a zero blood-alcohol privileges. Drivers may take an approved M2 road test, instead of the ministry road test. Class M2/M with L Condition: motorcycle licence that restricts the licence holder to operating mopeds or limited- speed motorcycles. Conviction: accompanying order, or under any municipal care and control of a vehicle at the time of a collision. Fatal Collision: collision statistics included deaths attributed one year after the collision. Since that date, collision have been included. the front seat, or if the passengers are immediate family members. Page 673 83Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Appendix Driving after having consumed an amount alcohol count of greater than zero but less than 80 milligrams per 100 millilitres of concentration from 0.05 to 0.08 results in a 3-day, 7-day, or 30-day roadside driver’s time occurrences, respectively. Immediately prior to that date, a blood-alcohol concentration from 0.05 to 0.08 resulted in a 12-hour suspension. Hangers-on: Hangers-on are persons hanging onto a moving motor vehicle’s fenders, bumpers, doors or other parts of the vehicle and not Highway: public use or used by the general public for the passage of vehicles, and including the Inattentive: due care and attention or placing less than full concentration on driving, e.g., changing radio stations, consuming food, reading, Kilometres Travelled: and motor fuel sales. Starting in 2000, Limited-Speed Motorcycle (Motor Scooter): a “motor scooter.” Motor scooters can be either electric or Most motor scooters have automatic displacement of 50 cubic centimeters. Major Injury: hospital, even if for observation only. Minimal Injury: Minor Injury: treatment at a hospital emergency room, involved person. Motor-Assisted Bicycle (Moped): “moped”. Mopeds have pedals that can be operated at all times. Mopeds can be either Mopeds have a piston displacement of not more that 50 cubic centimetres. Motor Vehicle Collision: to property is sustained as a result of the movement of a motor vehicle, or of its load Page 674 84Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Appendix to trails and paths, on the surface of a frozen lake or river, or in a private parking lot. On-Highway Collisions: Pedestrian: involved in a motor vehicle collision. Personal Injury Collision: not resulting in death. damage to any public property or damage to private property** including damage to the motor vehicle or its load. Reportable Collision: value prescribed by regulation.** Self-Reporting of a Collision: Under the [s.199 (1.1)], and, among other conditions, no criminal activities such as impaired driving) the involved person(s) may report the collision Suspension: ** The minimum reportable level for property- damage-only collisions is $2,000 as of Page 675 85Ontario Road Safety Annual Report 2018 Appendix 8B and individuals for their assistance: Police Services Ministry of the Solicitor General Ministry of the Attorney General Data Development Unit Ministry of Health Health Solutions Delivery Branch Health Data Decision Support Unit Ministry of Education School Board Business Support Branch Photos: This publication may be reproduced, reprinted, or in part, provided that such reproduction or storage is intended only for personal or educational use and not for monetary gains of any kind. In any permission of the Ministry of Transportation is Ministry of Transportation Toronto, Ontario M3M 0B4 ISSN #0832-8269 (Printed Version) ISSN #1710-2480 (Internet Version) Page 676 Ministry of Transportation Toronto, Ontario M3M 0B4 Page 677 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 1 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT A Focus on Regional Road Collision Statistics Based on 2019 and Preceding Years Prepared by: Corridor Control and Safety, Communications, Community Engagement and Marketing, Transportation Services AATTTTAACHMEN Page 678 2 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Acronyms and Abbreviations AADT: Average Annual Daily Traffic ASE: Automated Speed Enforcement CAA: Canadian Automobile Association MTO: Ministry of Transportation Ontario MVA: Motor Vehicle Accident PCS: Permanent Counting Station PDO: Property Damage Only PXO: Pedestrian Crossover SMV: Single Motor Vehicle TTS: Transportation Tomorrow Survey YR: York Region YRP: York Regional Police Table of Contents 3 6 7 14 28 40 52 62 72 82 91 Page 679 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 3 2019 YORK REGION VS ONTARIO INJURY/FATALITY RATES *York Region collisions on Regional roads reported by York Regional Police (YRP) *Population data is based on census data from Statistics Canada *Ontario collision data is from Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO) Ontario Road Safety Annual Reports York Region roads are planned, designed, constructed and operated to Ontario provincial guidelines. Compared to provincial average level, in 2019, York Region roads had lower injury/fatality rates for all major types of road users including motor vehicle drivers, pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists and truck drivers. This may be attributed to improved road engineering and operations, stricter traffic legislation and enforcement and systematic road safety initiatives in the Region. Page 680 4 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Travellers are involved in 5% fewer collisions and 3% fewer injuries each year, even with a 2% increase annually in population and trips made by all travellers in the Region. The motor vehicle accident rate (annual number of motor vehicle accidents over annual motor vehicle trips) in 2018 and 2019 was 11% lower than the 2013-2017 average. After the Region experienced a 10-year low in fatal collisions in 2017, a total of 12 fatalities, the fatal collision numbers rose to 19 in 2019. The fatal collision rate over the past two years (2018 and 2019) was11% higher than the average of the previous five years. It is well documented higher speeds lead to higher injury severity in collisions. More than half of all fatal collisions in 2018 and 2019 were related to speeding. Enforcement statistics over the past seven years also identify speeding as the top traffic offence in the Region, representing more than 60% of all traffic offences. While motor vehicles are the most common mode of travel in the Region, the number of people choosing active transportation modes, such as walking and cycling, is increasing at a fast pace. The rates of pedestrian (annual number of pedestrian collisions over annual walk trips) and cyclist collisions (annual number of cyclist collisions over annual bike trips) in 2018 and 2019 were 21% and 28%, respectively lower than the average of 2013-2017. Improving pedestrian and cyclist safety continues to be an area of focus due as the percentage of injuries continues to be above 80% Another type of vulnerable road user, motorcyclists, has doubled over the last 10 years, while the number of motorcycle collisions is generally very low and steady. The rate of motorcycle collisions (annual number of motorcycle collisions over annual motorcycle trips) in 2018 and 2019 was 33% lower than the 2013-2017 average. Motorcycle collisions are highly seasonal (mostly occurring in the warmer months of the year), distributed evenly among weekdays and weekends, and relatively high in some night hours. Although motorcyclists are usually not at fault in collisions, they have a high risk of losing control that can lead to a single motor vehicle (SMV) collision. Motorcyclists do not have the same level of protection as drivers of other types of vehicles and therefore have a higher injury rate when involved in a collision. Truck collision rate in 2018 and 2019 was 13% higher than the average of 2013-2017. Fatality rates remain at low levels and injury collision rates remain steady. More than half of truck traffic and collisions occur in the City of Vaughan where trucking distribution centres are predominant. Major trucking corridors like Highway 7, Highway 27, Weston Road and Keele Street provide key connections for goods movement to provincial highways (highways 400, 407 and 427). (2018/2019 Collision Rate Compared to 2013-2017) Page 681 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 5 Total collisions involving all public and private transit vehicles combined increased marginally by approximately 3% annually, while transit operations in the Region, including number of service hours and kilometres travelled, has increased over the past decade. The collision rate of exclusively YRT vehicles in 2018 and 2019 was 24% higher than the 2013-2017 average. Buses are slower, longer and require more space. A pattern of motorists failing to provide buses ample space have led to a spike in the number of sideswipe collisions. Sideswipe collisions involving private and public buses increased from 44 to 98 over the last two years, when compared to the previous five years. The majority of transit collisions (70%) were a result of the other vehicle driver being at fault. York Region recognizes that changing driver behaviour is crucial in improving road safety and continues to target top traffic violations with campaigns and programs. Data from YRP suggests the top traffic violation is speeding. The SpeedWATCH program aims to reduce speeding and increase speed limit compliance. Before-after analysis shows that this program has achieved both goals at most study locations. An automated speed enforcement program will also be piloted in select community safety zones approximately 2021-2023. The red light camera program aims to curb red light running behaviour and improve driver and pedestrian safety. Forty cameras are deployed at select signalized intersections, and Region-wide right angle collisions at signalized intersections have been reduced significantly. Page 682 6 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT York Region is home to nearly 1.2 million people in nine local cities and towns, bounded by Steeles Avenue in the south, Highway 50 in the west, York Durham Line in the east and Lake Simcoe in the north. The Region continues to experience growth and is expected to reach 1.5 million people by 2031. The Regional road network consists of approximately 4,400 lane-kilometres of urban and rural arterial roads, 2,200 intersections and approximately 890 traffic signals that help residents and visitors get to where they live, work and play. Regional roads carry more than six billion vehicle-kilometres of travel annually and more than 2.6 million vehicle trips daily. York Region’s Corridor Control and Safety division maintains and manages York Region’s traffic data system. The database contains information on all motor vehicle accidents that occur on York Regional roads, which result in property damage of $2,000 or greater, as well as any collision that results in a minor or serious injury or fatality. Collision information completed is collected from the provincial Motor Vehicle Accident (MVA) Report Form, by YRP. Completed copies of all MVA reports are provided to the Corridor Control and Safety division for record and to conduct further analyses. At this time, York Region’s traffic data system does not include collisions that occur on local municipal roadways and provincial highways as each local municipality and the Province manages their own data. First published in 2014, the 2020 Traveller Safety Report is the 7th edition containing collision statistics on York Regional roads, based on cause, temporal information, high collision locations, injury severity and modes of travel to identify trends and support decision-making. The 2020 report primarily includes data collected for 2017 to 2019 as well as updated data for comparing with previous iterations. The daily trip volumes of motorists, pedestrians, cyclists and other modes of travel shown throughout the report are sourced and forecasted from the most recent Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS), 2016. The 2020 Traveller Safety Report provides a detailed breakdown of the traveller experience on Regional roads using collision statistics and other data, such as traffic volume, weather and population. Collision data was analyzed using motor vehicle accident reports from YRP to identify issues for specific locations as well as broader trends. The report also supports law enforcement and helps in the development of programs to improve road safety, including public education and awareness campaigns for all travellers in York Region. The Traveller Safety Report informs our proactive approach to help make Regional roads safer for all travellers, and now the Region’s response to various trends, and associated benefits. The response includes the Region’s implemented or upcoming road safety initiatives in road engineering, intersection operations, pavement/signage improvements, bus rapidway constructions, automated enforcement, speed management and initiatives. Page 683 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 7 As a result of stricter legislation in technology advancements, and the success of road safety initiatives, injury and fatal collision rates for all road users have decreased significantly over the past 50 years, as shown in the figure below. York Region has lower collision rates than those of Ontario, with the exception of three years. Both injury and fatal collision rates in York Region have long-term decreasing trends, and total collision rates have dropped by 46% from 197 per 10,000 population in 2010 to 107 in 2019. COLLISION ACROSS YORK REGION, 1971-2019 *York Region collisions on Regional and local municipal roads reported by YRP *Population data is based on census data from Statistics Canada *Ontario collision numbers is from MTO Ontario Road Safety Annual Reports Overall, collisions are at a 10-year low Collisions are a result of numerous factors, of10 unique to specific events. A review over the past 10 years shows that motor vehicle accidents are decreasing despite more vehicles travelling on Regional roads than ever before. In 2019, there was a 10-year low in total collisions, with just over 7,000 collisions occurring on Regional roads. Most collisions, 89%, were a direct result of improper driving. An overview of collision statistics on Regional roads between 2017 and 2019 shows collisions continue to occur most frequently on Fridays during the winter months and the evening peak period (5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.). The most common were rear-end collisions at signalized intersections, as a result of motorists following too close. Consistent with past years, the majority of high collision intersections were situated on high volume roads in urban areas. The table on the next page compares collision data for 2017, 2018 and 2019. APPROXIMATELY 89% OF COLLISIONS ARE A RESULT OF IMPROPER DRIVING Page 684 8 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT ANNUAL COMPARISON OF COLLISIONS, 2017-2019 Statistics 2017 2018 2019 Change (2018-2019) Number of Collisions 7,672 7,510 7,038 -6% Number of Fatal Collisions 12 17 19 12% Number of Injury Collisions 1,977 1,936 1876 -3% Number of Collisions Involving Pedestrians 147 159 140 -12% Percentage of Collisions Involving Pedestrians Resulting in Injuries or Fatalities 93%96%94%-2% Number of Collisions Involving Cyclists 96 94 110 17% Percentage of Collisions Involving Cyclists Resulting in Injuries or Fatalities 82%78%86%8% Collision Rate per 100,000 Population 661 635 571 -10% Fatal Collision Rate per 100,000 Population 1 1.4 1.5 7% Day with Highest Number of Collisions Friday Friday Friday - Month with Highest Number of Collisions November January November - Hour with Highest Number of Collisions 5 to 6 p.m.5 to 6 p.m.5 to 6 p.m.- Most Common Collision Type Rear End Rear End Rear End - Page 685 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 9 DRAFT ANNUAL COMPARISON OF COLLISIONS, 2017-2019 (CONTINUED) Statistics 2017 2018 2019 Change (2018-2019) Most Frequently Recorded Improper Driving Action Following Too Close Following Too Close Following Too Close - Location with Highest Number of Collisions Highway 7 and Weston Road HIghway 7 and Weston Road HIghway 7 and Weston Road - Midblock with Highest Number of Collisions Highway 7 between Wigwoss Drive/ Helen Street and Pine Valley Drive Highway 7 between Huntington Road and Highway 427 - Highway 7 Ramp Highway 7 between Huntington Road and Highway 427 - Highway 7 Ramp - Percentage of Collisions Occurring at Intersections 68.80%69.40%68.24%-1% Percentage of Collisions Occurring During Winter Driving (Snow/Ice Road Surface) Conditions 6.00%6.80%9.80%3% Number of Daily Vehicle Trips 2554674 2602512 2650351 2% Number of Daily Walk Trips 97751 99898 102045 2% Number of Daily Cycle Trips 10948 11359 11770 4% Injury Collision Rate per 1,000 Vehicle Trips 3 2.89 2.66 -8% Injury Collision Rate per 1,000 Walk Trips 1.5 1.59 1.37 -14% Injury Collision Rate per 1,000 Cycle Trips 8.77 8.28 9.35 13% *York Region collisions on Regional roads reported by YRP *Population data is based on census data from Statistics Canada *Number of trips is based on TTS studies Page 686 10 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT In 2019, there was a 10-year low in the number of collisions on Regional roads The number of cyclist collisions are increasing as active transportation is becoming more popular in York Region. However, as growth in trips is outpacing growth in collisions, the rate of collisions is actually decreasing. Pedestrians and cyclists were most vulnerable to injuries, with 92% of pedestrians and 80% of cyclists sustaining injuries during collisions. Most collisions occurred when vehicles were making turns at signalized intersections. ANNUAL COLLISIONS BY ROAD USER MODES, 2010-2019 *York Region collisions on Regional roads reported by YRP A review of collision statistics over the last decade shows overall collisions on Regional roads continue to decrease, with a 10-year low in 2019, with just over 7,000 collisions. Collisions involving pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists were generally consistent despite increasing trips made by these modes. Collisions involving trucks are in a general decreasing trend. Collisions involving transit vehicles have increased over the last 10 years, while York Region Transit service hours have also increased by 12%, including the introduction of six Viva rapidways into operation. GO Transit has also significantly increased operations in the Region, transitioning from hourly to 15-minute two-way service on several key corridors prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Page 687 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 11 YORK REGION DAILY WALK/CYCLE TRIPS, 1996-2021 *Number of trips is based on TTS studies New measures to protect vulnerable road users Based on TTS studies, more and more people have chosen to walk or bike over the last 20 years. From 1996 to 2016, the total number of daily trips on foot or bicycle has increased 5% annually. In comparison, driving has only been increasing by 2%. It is estimated that daily walk and cycle trips within or crossing York Region boundaries will be close to 120,000 by 2021. Page 688 12 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT While 24% of vehicle-only collisions resulted in injury or fatality, almost all pedestrian (94%) and cyclist (82%) collisions resulted in injury or death. Pedestrians and cyclists are the most vulnerable travellers on the Regional transportation system and lack protection compared to travellers in enclosed vehicles, as shown in the figure below. The increase in pedestrian and cycling trips across the Region and high rate of injuries sustained make these modes of travel a key area of focus for safety improvements. PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST INJURY/FATALITY RATES *Number of trips is based on TTS studies To protect vulnerable road users, York Region has implemented pedestrian and cycling safety measures at select signalized intersections. The Region is measuring success to support future enhancements, while building strong partnerships with road safety partners. In addition to existing safety programs, including red light camera and speedWATCH, York Region will be launching a two-year automated speed enforcement (ASE) pilot with the goal to increase safety in school areas while also changing driver behaviour. Page 689 Page 690 14 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Driving is the most common mode of travel on Regional roads accounting for nearly 87% of total trips. Over 700,000 motor vehicle trips are made annually with over 6,000 annual collisions involving motor vehicles. Addressing motor vehicle safety is priority due to the volume of traffic and occurring frequency of collisions. The motor vehicle accident rate (annual number of motor vehicle accidents over annual motor vehicle trips) in 2018 and 2019 was 11% lower than the 2013-2017 average. Travellers were involved in 5% fewer collisions and 3% fewer injuries each year, even with a 2% increase annually in population and trips made by all travellers in the Region. This is encouraging and can be attributed to advancements in car technologies (e.g. airbags, anti-lock brakes, electronic stability control), road safety programs and legislation and enforcement. Key trends observed include: • Travellers were involved in 5% fewer collisions each year • Fatal collisions increased from 12 to 19 over the past two years • More than half of fatal collisions were speed related • Young drivers were more likely to be at fault in collisions that were more likely to be fatal than other age groups • Snowy and rainy weather increases collision risk • Majority of collisions occurred at intersections (69%) due to a high occurrence of conflict points with vehicles travelling in different directions and making turns • Following too close was the top driver action (30%) in the cause of a collision • Inattentive behaviour while driving was an increasing cause of collisions (19%) • Top impact types were rear-end (low severity, 35%) followed by angle collisions (high severity, 28%) The Region continues to put measures in place to address priority traffic safety concerns including: • Pavement rehabilitation programs, such as microsurfacing (adhesive mixture containing small stones applied to roads), not only extends the life of the road but also improves traction, leading to a reduction in rear-end collisions • Fully protected left turn implementation that reduces conflicts at high volume urban intersections • Traffic control upgrades to traffic signals or all-way stop that significantly reduce the frequency of angle collisions Page 691 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 15 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT RATES, 2010-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies After a 10-year low in fatal motor vehicle accidents in 2017 with a total of 12 fatalities, the number of fatalities rose in 2019 to 19. It is well-documented higher speeds lead to higher injury severity in a collision. Fatal collision statistics over the past two years show approximately 55% of all fatal collisions were related to speeding. Enforcement statistics over the past seven years also identify speeding as the top traffic violation in the Region, representing more than 60% of all traffic offences. Slower rates of speed and appropriate space between vehicles allows more time for motorists to react. Large vehicles like trucks and buses have many blind spots and need extra room to stop and turn. By driving safely, keeping distance and taking extra precautions around large trucks and buses, passenger vehicle drivers can significantly reduce the risk of being involved in a serious collision. Page 692 16 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Collisions by Month, Day and Time A greater understanding of when collisions are occurring Collision statistics by month indicate a seasonal trend. There are a higher number of collisions occurring during the fall while spring has the least. June 2019 had the highest number of injury/fatal collisions and the third highest in collisions overall. Also, June had the highest daily vehicle volumes as weather conditions were favourable and summer vacations had not begun. November had the highest number of overall collisions and property damage-only collisions. This is likely due to shorter daylight hours when evenings are darker and weather conditions are less favourable for road users. During the winter months, adverse or snow weather makes driving more dangerous by reducing tire traction and impairing visibility. Drivers typically adjust to road conditions and drive more slowly and carefully in snowy weather, and many people avoid or postpone unnecessary travel. This suggests an increase in less severe collisions (those producing only property damage) during winter, while more severe collisions (those resulting in injuries and fatalities) decrease. During the spring months, which have the lowest number of collisions, drivers typically continue to drive in winter driving mode even though weather conditions are getting more favourable for road users. COLLISIONS BY MONTH, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and Region’s Permanent Counting Station (PCS) data Page 693 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 17 The majority of all collisions, 73%, occurred during dry road surface conditions. Wet road surface conditions accounted for 20% and 7% occurred during snow/ice road surface conditions. Over the course of 2019, the Region experienced rain and snow events on 116 and 43 days, respectively. These observations are consistent with ongoing driver education campaigns about the need to drive according to conditions. Page 694 18 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Although the majority of collisions occurred during dry conditions, adverse weather conditions contributed to peak collision days. The top ten high frequency collision days between 2017 and 2019 experienced a winter event, its aftermath or a significant rainfall event. The number of collisions that occurred on the highest days were about triple the York Region average of 21 collisions per day. The top 10 days that experienced the most collisions are highlighted in the table below. TOP 10 HIGH FREQUENCY COLLISION DAYS, 2017-2019 Date Day of Week Number of Collisions Rain Snow 2017-04-07 Friday 115 2018-02-07 Wednesday 61 2019-11-11 Monday 58 2017-09-29 Friday 53 2019-02-27 Wednesday 51 2019-12-06 Friday 49 2017-11-02 Thursday 47 2017-12-13 Wednesday 45 2017-12-18 Monday 45 2019-01-19 Saturday 45 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Weather data is from Environment Canada During all winter weather months (November to April), collision rates on snowy days were significantly higher than those with no rain or snow. April had the highest daily collision numbers on snowy days. During the warm months (May to September), without snow events, daily collision rates on rainy days were higher than those days with no rain, except for July. Repaving increases tire grip and reduces collisions New pavement can increase vehicle tire grip on the road surface and give drivers better control, resulting in a reduction of rear-end collisions, and collisions related to aged pavement, bad weather and slippery road surfaces. Examples of repaved intersections that have experienced an overall collision reduction are Yonge Street and Green Lane, Green Lane and 2nd Concession Road and Kennedy Road and Helen Avenue/YMCA Boulevard, ranging from 23% to 79%. The reduction in adverse weather events is more significant, ranging from 42% to 89%. Page 695 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 19 Day-of-week collision patterns correlated closely with typical day-of-week traffic volume patterns, the highest number of collisions occurred on Fridays when people travel more. COLLISIONS BY DAY-OF-WEEK, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Time-of-day collision trend also correlated closely with typical daily traffic volume patterns (i.e. high numbers of collisions occur during highest traffic volume times). The highest number of collisions occurred on weekdays, between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., accounting for 53% of all collisions. Collisions were higher during the afternoon on weekends, which is consistent with the number of daily vehicle trips on weekends. Page 696 20 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT COLLISIONS BY TIME-OF-DAY, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data. Based on the three-year average between 2017 and 2019, the highest number of collisions occurred between 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and between 3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on weekends. Page 697 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 21 Age Profile AGE AND FATALITY RATE OF AT-FAULT DRIVERS *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Licensed drivers statistics and age distribution is from MTO 2016 Ontario Road Safety Annual Report Data shows a high need to engage drivers 20 to 29 years of age The age distribution of at-fault drivers compared to drivers fatally injured is shown in the figure above. Teenagers and young adults below the age of 25 were most likely to be at fault in a collision and also most likely to be fatally injured in a collision. For these drivers, the top at-fault action was following too close (25%), followed by failing to yield right-of-way (21%). These are also the top two at-fault actions of other driver age groups. Based on 2017 hospitalization data from York Region Public Health, drivers had the highest rate of emergency department visits for traffic accident-related injuries with 20 to 29 year olds having the highest rate compared to other age groups. These facts stress the importance of continuing to target this age group with education and enforcement. Page 698 22 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Driver Actions and Collision Impact Types DRIVER ACTIONS IN COLLISIONS, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports One of the most important collision diagnostics is driver behaviour. This refers to the mistake the driver made that caused the collision. The top at-fault action (27%) was following too close; however it is in a decreasing trend in terms of frequency and may soon be overtaken by fail to yield right-of-way. The decreasing frequency of collisions resulting from drivers following too closely could be due to improved vehicle safety technologies, such as brake assist and improvements of roadway safety technologies, such as microsurfacing treatments. Page 699 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 23 COLLISION IMPACT TYPES, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports Following too close driver behaviour often leads to rear-end collisions (35%), which was the most common collision impact type. Rear-end collisions are declining and may soon be overtaken by angle collisions as the predominant type. Angle collisions (28%) also experienced a declining trend although not as pronounced. Reducing angle collisions is a priority for the Region as evidenced by the continued investment in the red light camera program, explained below. York Region also adheres to industry standards in the conversion to intersection controls to all-way stop and traffic signal controls. While roundabouts outperform both, traffic signals and all- way stops have shown significant declines in angle collisions as opposed to a two-way stop control. Before-after analysis found that all-way stop conversions could reduce angle collisions by 60% to 100%, and traffic signal conversions could reduce angle collisions by 17% to 100%. BEFORE-AFTER ANALYSIS FOUND THAT ALL-WAY STOP IMPLEMENTATION COULD REDUCE ANGLE COLLISIONS BY 60% TO 100%, AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPLEMENTATION COULD REDUCE ANGLE COLLISIONS BY 17% TO 100%. Page 700 24 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Driver Actions DRIVER ACTIONS AND COLLISION LOCATIONS *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports A focus on reducing conflict points After following too close, fail to yield right-of-way (16%), making an improper turn (14%) and disobeying traffic control (12%) were the other major unsafe driver actions at intersections. 58% of collisions caused by these resulted in injuries or fatalities compared to only 38% of collisions caused by following too close. The Region has been focusing on reducing conflict points and frequency at intersections. One ongoing initiative is the conversion from protected/permissive left turn phases (advanced green signal before full moves green signal) to fully-protected left turn phases (left turns only allowed on advanced green arrow). This initiative reduces conflicts between left turning vehicles with through moving vehicles in the opposite direction. Preliminary data suggest that protected left turn movements reduce vehicle-to- vehicle conflicts by as much as 80%. Fully protected left turn phases have been implemented on intersections along the Region’s bus rapidways. Along Highway 7 East, between Bayview Avenue and South Town Centre Boulevard, York Region’s first bus rapidway, annual average intersection collisions have been reduced by 47% since its completion in 2014. Along Davis Drive, between Yonge Street and just east of Southlake Regional Health Centre, which is the Region’s second bus rapidway in operation, annual average intersection collisions have been reduced by 44% since its completion in 2015. FULLY PROTECTED LEFT TURN MOVEMENTS CAN REDUCE VEHICLE TO VEHICLE CONFLICTS BY AS MUCH AS 80%. Page 701 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 25 Distracted Driving COLLISIONS BY AT-FAULT DRIVER CONDITION, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports Distracted driving remains top concern Collisions where the condition of the at-fault driver was recorded as “normal” or “unknown” accounted for 77% of all collisions. Of the remaining, most of them were identified as distracted driving. New distracted driving laws on using hand-held devices while driving came into effect in Ontario on January 1, 2019. Drivers caught talking on their phones, texting, dialing or emailing using a hand-held device (such as a cell phone and other entertainment devices) will be fined up to $1,000 with a three- day licence suspension and three demerit points. Despite the new law, 19% of at-fault drivers were still driving distracted, based on YRP MVA reports. According to the Canadian Automobile Association (CAA): • Drivers conversing on mobile devices, either hands-free or hand-held were up to four times as likely to be involved in a crash • 80% of collisions and 65% of near-crashes had some form of driver inattention as contributing factors • Distraction was a factor in nearly 6 out of 10 moderate-to-severe teen crashes (AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, 2015) • Almost half of all people fatally injured in teen (15-19 years of age) distraction-affected crashes were teens themselves. (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2013). Distracted driving is the target of York Region’s Pledge to Ignore campaign, which has won IABC Award of Excellence and MTO Road Safety Initiative of the Year. The Pledge to Ignore campaign is designed to help save lives and asks travellers to make a commitment not to use a cell phone while driving or walking near traffic. The goal is to obtain as many pledges as possible from citizens across York Region. Each pledge represents one less distracted driver. To date, the campaign has received over 85,000 pledges. DISTRACTED DRIVING IS THE TARGET OF YORK REGION’S AWARD WINNING PLEDGE TO IGNORE CAMPAIGN. Page 702 26 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Page 703 Page 704 28 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT PEDESTRIAN COLLISION RATES, 2013-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is a general representation for comparison purposes based on TTS study data Pedestrians are the most vulnerable road users The pedestrian collision rate over the past two years was 21% lower than the average of the previous five years, as shown in the figure above. As the number of walk trips being made on Regional roads increased, injury and fatal collision rates were in a decreasing trend. Annual numbers of fatal collisions were stable, but proportionately remained very low (2.5%) among total collisions. While 24% of motor- vehicle-only collisions resulted in injuries or fatalities, almost all pedestrian collisions (94%) resulted in pedestrian injury or death. Pedestrians are the most vulnerable travellers and lack personal protection compared to travellers in enclosed vehicles. Key trends observed include: • Almost all pedestrian collisions (94%) resulted in pedestrian injury or death • Young pedestrians were more likely to get injured in collisions, and senior pedestrians over 75 years old were most likely to be fatally injured than other age groups • Pedestrian safety is affected by environmental factors like daylight level • Majority of pedestrian collisions occurred at intersections (88%) as a result of high presence and high occurrence of conflict points between vehicles and pedestrians • Right-of-way conflicts between pedestrians and motor vehicles and associated errors caused most pedestrian collisions, especially at intersections Page 705 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 29 The Region continues to put measures in place to address the priority pedestrian safety concerns including: • Implementing community safety zones in all school locations to encourage compliance in obeying the rules of the road • Piloting automated speed enforcement in select school zones (2021-2023) • Piloting leading pedestrian intervals, right turn on red signal restrictions, fully protected left turns and advisory signage at intersections with high conflict rates between pedestrians and motor vehicles • Installing pedestrian crossing devices in accordance with Provincial criteria • Education campaigns including the award winning Pledge to Ignore Campaign and the Be visible. Be seen. campaign Pedestrian Collisions by Month, Day and Time PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS BY MONTH, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Pedestrian collisions occurred throughout the year, the highest number of these occurred in the fall and winter from October to January, despite daily vehicle volumes being the lowest. This is likely the result of daylight becoming shorter and pedestrians are less visible. THE ANNUAL VISIBILITY CAMPAIGN TARGETS THE INCREASE OF COLLISIONS INVOLVING PEDESTRIANS IN THE FALL MONTHS. Page 706 30 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS BY DAY-OF-WEEK, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Pedestrian collisions were more likely to occur on Thursdays and Fridays, correlating closely with typical weekly traffic patterns. Page 707 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 31 PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS BY TIME-OF-DAY, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Page 708 32 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Be Visible. Be Seen. The highest number of pedestrian collisions occurred between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., and 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays when traffic and pedestrian volumes are typically highest, with vehicle and walk trips being made to go to work in the morning and home in the evening. Pedestrian collisions were more likely to occur in the evening, between 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. during the weekend when the road environment is getting dark and pedestrians are less visible. Analysis of this data has resulted in the annual Be visible. Be seen campaign in the fall that recognizes that shorter daylight hours, changing weather and reduced visibility can result in significant safety issues. This campaign aims to raise awareness for all road users with tips on how to stay visible and look out for each other on roads. Age Profile Pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcycle riders are all vulnerable road users who are most at risk when a collision occurs because they are unprotected by seat-belts, airbags, and the shell and metal frame of four-wheeled vehicles. Children may put themselves at risk because of inexperience. The elderly and those with mobility issues are especially vulnerable due to decreased ability to take evasive actions. INJURED OR FATALLY INJURED PEDESTRIANS AGE DISTRIBUTION *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Population data is from Statistics Canada Page 709 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 33 Pedestrians 15 to 19 years of age were most likely to get injured in a collision. Senior pedestrians 75 plus years involved in a collision had the highest fatality rate. Based on 2017 hospitalization data from York Region Public Health, 16 to 19 year old pedestrians had the highest rate of emergency department visits due to collisions while those 70 years of age and up had the highest rate of hospitalizations due to collisions. Pedestrian Collision Locations Most pedestrian collisions occur at intersections with traffic signals More than 80 percent of pedestrian collisions occurred at signalized intersections, as these locations have the highest pedestrian presence and high occurrence of conflict points between vehicles and pedestrians. A collision density map showing the location of all reported pedestrian collisions on Regional roads from 2017 to 2019 is shown on the next page. It is followed by a table showing the top 10 pedestrian collision locations, based on a 10-year total. Pedestrian collisions overwhelmingly occur in urban areas. Many of the intersections in these areas were rebuilt as part of vivaNext rapidway corridors with enhanced pedestrian safety features, such as two-stage pedestrian crossings, protected left turn movements, enhanced crosswalk pavement markings and reduced curb radii to slow down right turning vehicles. Many have also been the location for pedestrian safety outreach events. YORK REGION’S AUTOMATED SPEED ENFORCEMENT PILOT WILL TARGET SCHOOL ZONES. Page 710 34 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Page 711 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 35 TOP 10 HIGHEST PEDESTRIAN COLLISION FREQUENCY LOCATIONS, 10-YEAR TOTAL 2010-2019 Location Municipality Ten-Year Injury Pedestrian Collisions Ten-Year Total Pedestrian Collisions Yonge Street and Carrville Road/16th Avenue Richmond Hill 16 19 Major Mackenzie Drive West and Jane Street Vaughan 14 15 Yonge Street and Clark Avenue/Clark Avenue West Markham 14 15 Yonge Street and Wellington Street East/West Aurora 13 14 Highway 7 and McCowan Road Markham 12 14 Centre Street and North Promenade/Disera Drive Vaughan 12 13 Highway 7 and Weston Road Vaughan 12 13 Yonge Street and Elgin Mills Road West/Elgin Mills Road East Richmond Hill 12 12 Highway 7 and Pine Valley Drive Vaughan 11 12 Yonge Street and Mulock Drive Newmarket 10 12 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports As a further step to predict intersection safety performance, a pedestrian and cyclist safety index was developed to prioritize Regional signalized intersections based on risk exposure. Following the principles of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program approach, the index was constructed as a weighted score taking into consideration variables such as road characteristics, road user volume, crossing distance, speed limit and environment. The sum of the factor scores equates to the total weighted prioritization score (out of 60) for each intersection. With higher scores indicating higher priority for improvement, a ranked list of intersections with scores over 48 (80% of 60) or greater are summarized in the intersection priority index table on the next page. Page 712 36 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT INTERSECTION PRIORITY INDEX *Excluded due to recent or imminent construction ** Excluded due to identified traffic operational impacts Page 713 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 37 Driver and Pedestrian Actions Pedestrian collisions were found to be predominantly attributed to improper driver action by motorists. Pedestrians were considered at fault in only 15% of all pedestrian collisions. Of all pedestrian collisions resulting from improper driver action, 77% were a direct cause of drivers failing to yield right-of-way; 8% were a result of drivers making improper turns. Pedestrians crossing without right-of-way, including crossing at midblock without a marked crosswalk or crossing against the flow of traffic at a signalized intersection, accounted for 37% of all pedestrian at-fault collisions. MOTOR VEHICLE MANOEUVERS IN PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports Overall, 68% of pedestrian collisions involved vehicles making left or right turns. Most occurred when pedestrians are crossing with the right-of-way. 77% OF PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS ARE A DIRECT CAUSE OF DRIVERS FAILING TO YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY Page 714 38 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Pedestrian Safety Measures Pilot programs to change driver behaviour lmproving pedestrian safety remains a priority and York Region is currently piloting short-term safety measures, including leading pedestrian intervals (pedestrian gets a head start in crossing the road), right turn on red signal restrictions, fully-protected left turns and advisory signage, to help reduce conflicts between drivers and pedestrians and increase driver awareness of pedestrians. Due to their high risk exposure for pedestrians and cyclists (based on the safety index mentioned above), the following intersections were selected for operational measures on a one year pilot basis: • Bathurst Street and Carrville Road/Rutherford Road • Bathurst Street and Clark Avenue • Major Mackenzie Drive and Bayview Avenue • Yonge Street and Clark Avenue The Region is also assessing other medium-term improvements. Examples include installation of a Pedestrian Crossover (PXO), which consists of new signs and pavement markings that serve to enhance the mobility of pedestrians. A PXO is ideal for locations where some pedestrian demand exists but volumes are not enough to warrant traditional traffic or pedestrian signal installations. A PXO can be converted to a pedestrian signal in the future once the warrant criteria for a pedestrian signal has been met. The first PXO on a Regional road in York Region will be on Yonge Street near Holland Landing Community Centre and is to be installed in 2021. Other safety measures also being considered for pilots in 2021 are advanced stop lines to discourage motorists from stopping too close to a crosswalk, and flexible delineators at intersection corners to prevent turning vehicles from encroaching onto the sidewalk or boulevard areas. Page 715 Page 716 40 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT CYCLIST COLLISION RATES, 2013-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports * Cyclist collisions include the collisions involving e-scooters and e-bikes, as both these vehicles are coded as bikes in YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is a general representation for comparison purposes based on TTS study data Although the number of cycle trips on Regional roads had been increasing, injury collision rates were on a decreasing trend. However, cyclists sustained injury in over 82% of all cyclist collisions, while 24% of motor-vehicle-only collisions resulted in injury or fatality. Page 717 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 41 Key trends observed include: • Majority (82%) of cycling collisions resulted in injury or death • Young or senior cyclists were more likely to get injured or fatally injured in collisions • Cyclist collisions were highly seasonal, mostly in summer months when cyclist activity is highest • Majority of cyclist collisions occurred at intersections (80%) as a result of high cyclist presence and a high occurrence of conflict points between vehicles and cyclists • Motor vehicles were more likely to be at fault (62%) in cyclist collisions • Motor vehicles making turns, especially right turns, were mostly likely to get involved in cyclist collisions Promoting safe cycling Through the york.ca/cycling web page and various initiatives, the Region continues to provide cycling safety education and promote safe cycling. Many of the Region’s safety measures are jointly aimed at pedestrian and cycling safety, including: • Piloting leading pedestrian intervals, right turn on red restrictions, fully-protected left turns and advisory signage at intersections with high conflict rates between cyclists and motorists • Education campaigns, including the award winning Pledge to Ignore campaign and the Be visible. Be seen. campaign • Implementing community safety zones for all school locations with increased speeding fines and piloting automated speed enforcement in select community safety zones as youth are more likely to be injured or fatally injured than any other age group Page 718 42 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Cyclist Collisions by Month, Day and Time CYCLIST COLLISIONS BY MONTH, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Cyclist collisions occurred in nearly every month of the year, with the most occurring in the summer months (June through September), accounting for 64%, as more cyclists tend to be on the roads when the weather is favourable. In contrast, less than 4% of cyclist collisions occurred in the winter months (January through March). Page 719 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 43 CYCLIST COLLISIONS BY MONTH, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Cyclist collisions were more likely to occur on Thursdays and Fridays, correlating closely with typical weekly traffic patterns and patterns seen for pedestrians. Page 720 44 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT CYCLIST COLLISIONS BY TIME-OF-DAY, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Cyclist collisions generally followed traffic volume trends, similar to pedestrians, with peaks in the AM and PM peak period on weekdays and mid-day on weekends. Page 721 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 45 Age Profile AGE OF INJURED OR FATALLY INJURED CYCLISTS, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Population data is from Statistics Canada As shown in the figure above, cyclists ages 15 to 19 were most likely to get injured or fatally injured in a collision. Senior cyclists 65 to 74 years of age involved in a collision also had a high fatality rate. These two age groups are similar to the pedestrian age groups associated with high injury risks. In addition, the activity areas of cyclists overlap with those of pedestrians to a large degree. Measures and campaigns benefit pedestrian safety can improve cyclist safety as well. Page 722 46 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Cyclist Collision Locations Most cyclist collisions occur at intersections with traffic signals Cyclist collisions are more likely to occur at signalized intersections, making up over 60% of all cyclist collisions, as intersection locations have a high cyclist presence and occurrence of conflict points between motor vehicles and cyclists. A collision density map showing the locations of all reported cyclist collisions on Regional roads from 2017 to 2019 is shown on the next page. It is followed by a table showing the top 10 cyclist collision locations, based on 10-year total. Page 723 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 47 Page 724 48 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT TOP 10 HIGHEST CYCLIST COLLISION FREQUENCY LOCATIONS, 10-YEAR TOTAL, 2010-2019 Location Municipality 10-Year Injury Cyclist Collisions 10-Year Total Cyclist Collisions 14th Avenue and Markham Road Markham 8 8 Dufferin Street and Glen Shields Avenue Vaughan 4 8 Kennedy Road and 14th Avenue Markham 5 7 Kennedy Road and Clayton Drive Markham 6 6 Kennedy Road and Denison Street Markham 4 6 Bathurst Street and Clark Avenue West Vaughan 4 6 Major Mackenzie Drive West and Hwy 400 northbound Off-Ramp Vaughan 3 6 Prospect Street and Bayview Avenue/Mulock Drive Newmarket 5 5 Yonge Street and Mulock Drive Newmarket 5 5 Kennedy Road and Hwy 407 EB Off-Ramp Markham 5 5 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports Page 725 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 49 Driver and Cyclist Actions Improper driver action is the main cause of cyclist collisions Cyclist collisions were found to be predominantly attributed to improper driver action by motorists. Cyclists were considered at fault in only 38% of all cyclist collisions. Of all cyclist collisions resulting from improper driver action, 75% were a direct cause of drivers failing to yield right-of-way; 15% resulted from drivers making improper turns. Cyclists failing to yield right-of-way accounted for 33% of all cyclist at-fault collisions. MOTOR VEHICLE MANOEUVERS IN CYCLIST COLLISIONS *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports Overall, 42% of cyclist collisions involved vehicles making right turns and only 16% involved left-turning vehicles. Most of these collisions occurred when cyclists were crossing with right-of-way. For the collisions where cyclists are at fault due to disobeying traffic control, fail to yield right-of-way, etc. right-turning-vehicles were also more likely to get involved than going-ahead or left-turning vehicles. OVERALL, 42% OF CYCLIST COLLISIONS INVOLVE VEHICLES MAKING RIGHT TURNS Page 726 50 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Page 727 Page 728 52 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT MOTORCYCLE COLLISION RATES, 2013-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is a general representation for comparison purposes based on TTS study data Travel by motorcycle is growing in popularity While the number of motorcycle trips being made on Regional roads have almost doubled during the last 10 years, motorcycle collision rates in 2018 and 2019 were 33% lower than the average of 2013-2017. Fatal collision rates have stayed at a very low level and injury collision rates have reduced by 54%. Similar to pedestrians and cyclists, motorcyclists are vulnerable road users. While 24% of motor-vehicle-only collisions resulted in injuries or fatalities, 71% of motorcycle collisions resulted in injuries or fatalities. MOTORCYCLE COLLISION RATES HAVE REDUCED BY NEARLY 33% IN THE LAST 7 YEARS Page 729 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 53 Key trends observed include: • Most motorcycle collisions occurred in the warmer months of the year; weekdays and weekends had similar levels of daily motorcycle collisions, and late night hours may be associated with increased motorcycle collision risk • In multi-vehicle collisions involving motorcyclists, the driver of the other vehicles was predominantly at fault (68%) • Motorcyclists were involved in more single motor vehicle accidents than vehicles, often at fault losing control of their motorcycles Measures continue to be put in place to address motorcycle safety including: • YRP emphasizes motorcycle safety and awareness programs in the spring and summer months Motorcycle Collisions by Month, Day and Time The majority of motorcycle collisions, 96%, occurred April through October, which are the warmer months of the year and associated with motorcycle activities. MOTORCYCLE COLLISIONS BY MONTH, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Page 730 54 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Motorcycle collisions were more likely to occur on Sundays, Fridays and Wednesdays. On average, Saturdays and Sundays had similar daily collision numbers to weekdays. This implies that motorcycle trips are likely to be evenly distributed among all days of a week, while auto-vehicle volumes are much lower during weekends. MOTORCYCLE COLLISIONS BY DAY-OF-WEEK, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Motorcycle collisions generally follow daily traffic volume, with morning and evening peak periods on weekdays and mid-day on weekends. Noteworthy is motorcycle collisions spiked during 11:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. on weekdays, and 10:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. on weekends, which could be due to late night hours or other behaviour. Page 731 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 55 MOTORCYCLE COLLISIONS BY TIME-OF-DAY, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Page 732 56 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Driver Actions and Impact Types MOTORCYCLE COLLISION IMPACT TYPES AND DRIVER ACTIONS *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports Motorcycles are relatively small and the rider’s view of other vehicles is more easily obstructed. Motorcycle actions are also more difficult to predict than other types of vehicles due to their maneuverability. This explains why other types of vehicles are much more likely (68%) to be at fault in motorcycle collisions. Motorcyclists tend to cause SMV collisions when they lose control of their motorcycle. The most common driver errors made by other vehicles is improper turns, followed by fail to yield right-of-way. When a motorcyclist caused the collision, lost control was the top reason, which typically led to a SMV collision. MAJORITY OF COLLISIONS INVOLVING MOTORCYCLES ARE CAUSE BY OTHER VEHICLE AT-FAULT ACTIONS. Page 733 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 57 DRIVER ACTIONS IN MOTORCYCLE COLLISIONS *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports Motorcycle Activity and Collision Locations A collision density map showing the locations of all reported motorcycle collisions on Regional roads from 2017 to 2019 is shown on the following page. Page 734 58 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Page 735 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 59 The Top 10 motorcycle collision locations based on 10-year total are listed in the following table. TOP 10 HIGHEST MOTORCYCLE COLLISION FREQUENCY LOCATIONS, 10-YEAR TOTAL, 2010-2019 Location Municipality Ten-Year Injury Motorcycle Collisions Ten-Year Total Motorcycle Collisions 16th Avenue and Main Street Markham North/Highway 48 Markham 6 7 Keele Street and Highway 7 Vaughan 4 6 Highway 7 and Vaughan Valley Boulevard Vaughan 3 5 Yonge Street and Carrville Road/16th Avenue Richmond Hill 1 5 Major Mackenzie Drive West and Vellore Woods Boulevard/ Cityview Boulevard Vaughan 4 4 Highway 7 between Marycroft Avenue/Aberdeen Avenue and Whitmore Road/Ansley Grove Road Vaughan 4 4 Highway 7 and McCowan Road Markham 3 4 Highway 27 and Rutherford Road Vaughan 3 4 Davis Drive West and Bathurst Street King/ Newmarket 3 4 Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road Vaughan 3 4 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports Page 736 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Page 737 Page 738 62 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT TRUCK COLLISION RATES AND PROPORTIONS, 2013-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS study data The truck collision rate over the past two years was 13% higher than the average of the previous five years, as shown in the figure above. Sideswipe collisions were the most predominant type for trucks at 20%. Truck collision rates over the past two years were 13% higher than the average of the previous five years. Fatality rates remained at low levels and injury collision rates were steady. The percentage of truck collisions among all collisions increased from 5.9% in 2015 to 7.4 % in 2019, other types of collisions decreased. 24% of motor-vehicle-only collisions resulted in injuries or fatalities, only 16% of truck collisions caused injuries or fatalities. Provincial highways are major trucking destinations Over last ten years, fatal truck collision rates stayed at a very low level, with injury truck collision rates stable. Percentage of truck collisions among all collisions increased from 5.9% in 2015 to 7.4% in 2019, other types of collisions decreased. While 24% of motor-vehicle-only collisions resulted in injuries or fatalities, only 16% of truck collisions were injuries or fatalities. 24% OF MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISIONS RESULTED IN INJURIES OR FATALITIES. 16% OF TRUCK COLLISIONS CAUSED INJURIES OR FATALITIES Page 739 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 63 Key trends observed include: • Truck collision rates over the past two years were13% higher than the average of the previous five years • There were more truck collisions in summer and fall than in winter and spring, and these predominantly occurred on weekdays • Weekday truck collisions occurred mostly during daytime without obvious AM or PM peaks, likely that commercial truck trips are distributed more evenly during daytime compared to common commuter trips • Sideswipe collisions were the most predominant collision type for trucks at 20% • Trucks were more likely to rear-end other vehicles, while other top at-fault action for other vehicles was sideswiping trucks • More than half of truck traffic and collisions occurred in the City of Vaughan where trucking distribution centres are predominant • The road segments connecting Regional major trucking destinations to major Provincial highways (Hwy 400, 401, 404, 407 and 427) were associated with the highest truck volumes and truck collision risks Truck Collisions by Month, Day and Time The highest number of truck collisions occurred in October. During June and August, there was also higher a number of truck collisions than other months, due to the high vehicle volumes on roads. TRUCK COLLISIONS BY MONTH, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Page 740 64 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Truck collision numbers peaked on Fridays and 94% of truck collisions occurred on weekdays, which are associated with most commercial trucks’ activities. TRUCK COLLISIONS BY DAY-OF-WEEK, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data During weekdays, truck collisions mostly occurred during the 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. period, without obvious AM or PM peaks. This implies commercial truck trips are different from common commuting trips in that they are distributed more evenly during daytime hours. On weekends, truck collision distribution generally followed traffic volumes, with a spike in early morning (6:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m.). Page 741 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 65 TRUCK COLLISIONS BY TIME-OF-DAY, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Page 742 66 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT TRUCK TYPES INVOLVED IN COLLISIONS *The collision data is from YRP MVA reports. Truck Collision Impact Types Trucks need more space The most common collision types involving trucks were sideswipe (20%) and rear-end. Trucks are much longer than vehicles, move slower and require more space. Truck drivers also require more reaction time, which is evidenced in the case of rear-end collisions, when a truck driver is more often at fault for following too closely. This is contrary to sideswipe collisions where the motor vehicle driver is more often at fault, indicating a pattern of motorists failing to provide trucks ample space. Page 743 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 67 TRUCK COLLISION IMPACT TYPES AND DRIVER ACTIONS *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports The numbers of at-fault trucks and other vehicles involved in truck collisions were very close. The top at-fault truck driver action was following too close, which accounted for 40% of total truck driver at-fault actions. The top at-fault action of other vehicles was failing to yield right-of-way, which accounted for 25% of total other vehicle at-fault actions. TOP AT-FAULT TRUCK DRIVER ACTION IS FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE Page 744 68 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Truck Activity and Collision Locations TRUCK TRAFFIC AND COLLISIONS BY MUNICIPALITY *Truck traffic data is from MTO 2016 Commercial Vehicle Study The above figure shows that truck activities and number of collisions were proportionally correlated. Among the nine York Region municipalities, more than half of truck traffic was in the City of Vaughan as are truck collisions. A truck activity density map showing truck traffic volume on Regional roads from 2010 to 2019, and a collision density map showing the locations of all reported truck collisions on Regional roads from 2017 to 2019, are shown on the following two pages. The Regional road segments with highest truck volumes in the City of Vaughan were Highway 7 between Jane Street and Weston Road, Highway 7 between Highway 427 and Highway 50, and Keele Street between Highway 7 and Steeles Avenue. These sections connect major trucking destinations such as the CN MacMillan Yard at Highway 7 and Keele Street, to major Provincial highways including Highway 400, Highway 427 and Highway 407. Page 745 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 69Page 746 70 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Page 747 Page 748 72 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT TRANSIT (PRIVATE AND PUBLIC) COLLISION RATES, 2013-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies Collisions involving all public and private transit vehicles combined increased marginally by approximately 3% annually, while transit operations in the Region, including the number of service hours and kilometres travelled, increased over the past decade. The collision rate of exclusively YRT vehicles in 2018 and 2019 was 24% higher than the2013-2017 average. Although transit (public and private) collision rates increased, the injury and fatality rates have stayed low. Sideswipe transit collisions increased from 44 to 98 over the last two years, when compared to the previous five years. The majority of transit collisions (70%) were a result of the other vehicle driver at fault. Bus rapidways benefit all travellers To promote sustainable transportation and growth, York Region is advancing its transit systems, in particular building bus rapidways on selected segments of its major transit corridors, such as Highway 7, Davis Drive and Yonge Street. The safety measures associated with bus rapidway operations improved overall traffic safety, reducing collisions by about 50%. THERE HAVE BEEN NO FATALITIES RESULTING FROM COLLISIONS INVOLVING TRANSIT VEHICLES IN THE PAST THREE YEARS Page 749 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 73 Key trends observed include: • Over the last seven years, the number of transit collisions leading to fatalities were low (three in total). There have been no fatal transit collisions since 2016 • There were more transit collisions in the winter months than in summer and these predominantly occurred on weekdays • Sideswipe collisions involving private and public buses increased by 120% over the last two years when compared to the previous five years • In multi-vehicle collisions involving transit buses, the drivers of the other vehicles were mostly at fault (more than 70%) Transit Collisions by Month, Day and Time There was a higher number of transit collisions in the winter, which was attributed to shorter daylight hours and adverse weather. TRANSIT COLLISIONS BY MONTH, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Page 750 74 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT The number of transit collisions peaked on Thursdays, and more than 89% of transit collisions occurred on weekdays, which are associated with busier transit bus schedules and heavier ridership. TRANSIT COLLISIONS BY DAY-OF-WEEK, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data During weekdays, the time of day transit collision trend correlated closely with typical daily traffic volume patterns (i.e. high numbers of collisions occurred during highest traffic volume times). The highest number of collisions occurred on weekdays, between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., accounting for more than 50% of all collisions. Collisions were higher during the afternoon on weekdays, which is consistent with the number of daily vehicle trip patterns. On weekends, the highest number of collisions occurred between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. Page 751 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 75 TRANSIT COLLISIONS BY TIME-OF-DAY, THREE-YEAR AVERAGE, 2017-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Page 752 76 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Impact Types and Driver Actions Overall, other vehicles were at fault more than 70% of the time in collisions involving transit vehicles. More than half of transit collision types were sideswipes, with other vehicles at fault more than 80%. Sideswipe collisions involving all private and public buses has increased from 44 to 98 Buses are slower, longer and require more space than smaller motor vehicles. Motorists failing to provide buses ample space has led to a spike in the number of sideswipe collisions. Sideswipe collisions involving private and public buses increased from 44 to 98 over the last two years, when compared to the previous five years. The majority of transit collisions (70%) were a result of other vehicle drivers being at fault. BUS COLLISION IMPACT TYPES *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports and YRT *Bus mileage data is from YRT Page 753 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 77 Bus Rapidways Bus rapidways continue to show positive safety results York Region’s first bus rapidway was completed in 2014 on Highway 7 East between Bayview Avenue and South Town Centre Boulevard in the City of Markham. This was followed by the completion of the rapidway on Davis Drive between Yonge Street and just east of Southlake Regional Health Centre in 2015. Since then, four additional bus rapidways on Bathurst Street and Centre Street in the City of Richmond Hill, Yonge Street in the Town of Newmarket and Highway 7 in the City of Vaughan have been completed and opened. It has been noted total collisions have decreased by one-half on road segments with bus rapidways, with injury collisions also decreasing significantly. The safety measures associated with bus rapidway operations augment safety for travellers of all modes. These include: • Restricted access from side streets • Regulatory speed limit reductions • Transit signal phasings • Protected left turn movements • Reduced curb radii • Cycle lanes/tracks • Audible pedestrian signals • Two-stage pedestrian crossings and enhanced markings and signs COLLISIONS HAVE REDUCED BY 50% FOLLOWING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RAPIDWAYS Page 754 78 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT The number of collisions on Highway 7 between Bayview Avenue and South Town Centre Boulevard decreased by 50% since completion of the rapidway. The number of injuries has also reduced by 16%. Conversely, the annual average daily traffic (AADT) of the same road segment increased by 6% post construction. COLLISIONS ALONG HIGHWAY 7 BUS RAPIDWAY, 2006-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Timelines of bus rapidway construction is from YRT website THE NUMBER OF COLLISIONS HAS DECREASED BY 50% SINCE COMPLETION OF THE RAPIDWAY. THE NUMBER OF INJURIES HAS ALSO REDUCED BY 16%. Page 755 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 79 The number of collisions on the segment of Davis Drive featuring the rapidway decreased by 48% since completion of the rapidway. Number of injuries has also reduced by 40%. The average AADT of this corridor varied between 26,279 and 29,065 and there is no significant change between pre-, during and post-construction periods. COLLISIONS ALONG DAVIS DRIVE BUS RAPIDWAY, 2008-2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Timelines of bus rapidway construction is from YRT website THE NUMBER OF COLLISIONS HAS DECREASED BY 48% SINCE COMPLETION OF THE RAPIDWAY. THE NUMBER OF INJURIES HAS ALSO REDUCED BY 40%. Page 756 80 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT DRAFT Page 757 Page 758 82 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Taking steps to change driver behaviour As more than two-thirds of all collisions occurred at intersections, York Region has taken major steps to improve intersection safety. The main approaches include improving safety at existing signalized intersections with changes to turning movements, upgrading with stop control to traffic signals, converting two-way controlled intersections to all-way stop-controlled and implementing roundabouts. Recognizing that changing driver behaviour is crucial to improving road safety, York Region has been targeting top traffic offences with campaigns and programs. As per York Region Police Annual Statistical Reports from 2017 to 2019, the top traffic offence was speeding, accounting for over 62% of all traffic offences. It is well known that higher impact speeds leads to higher injury severity levels in collisions. Research found when a car hits a pedestrian at a speed of 50 km/hr, the likelihood of a pedestrian fatal injury is 85%. When the speed is 30 km/hr, the likelihood is 10%. According to 2017 data, 22% of fatal car collisions in Canada involved speeding. York Region has been actively advancing speed management programs, public education, legislation and enforcement to reduce speed-related collisions. In partnership with YRP, the Region launched the Slow Down Campaign, focused on stunt driving and speeding, with messages to encourage motorists to support one another by obeying the rules of the road and driving according to posted speed limits. Road safety programs, such as SpeedWATCH, have been implemented to help curb speeding. An automated speed enforcement program is planned to be piloted in select community safety zones. Red light running is another traffic safety priority for the Region, as this violation is a main reason for right-angle collisions that causes more severe injuries than other type of collision. The Region introduced red light camera programs in 2013 to help reduce red light running and improve driver and pedestrian safety. YORK REGION TRAFFIC OFFENCES, 2017-2019 *Traffic violation data is from YRP Annual Statistical Reports *Red Light Running in the chart does not include the violations caught by red light cameras Page 759 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 83 SpeedWATCH Displaying travel speed encourages compliance While YRP are in charge of enforcement of speed limits on Regional roads, the Region assists with education and data collection. The SpeedWATCH program, initiated in 2014, is designed for this purpose. Residents can promote safe driving in their community by requesting a speed board. Speed boards measure the speed of passing vehicles and display the travel speed of vehicles as they pass. This encourages drivers to stay within the speed limit. Speed boards can also be placed along Regional roads to monitor locations for excessive speeding. The speed board collects speed data that helps evaluate the degree of speeding and allocate resources in the priority locations. Upon receiving a speed board request from residents, staff deploys one speed board to the requested location for three to four months, then is assigned to other locations. This rotation allows maximizing road coverage and distributing the boards equally across the Region. Data collected before and after the implementation of a speed board has shown that speed boards can reduce average operating speed by 13% and increase speed limit compliance by 31%. To request a SpeedWATCH board visit the Speed Monitoring Boards page to complete the SpeedWATCH request form. Page 760 84 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Automated Speed Enforcement A new tool to help increase safety in school areas Speeding around schools puts the lives of the most vulnerable at risk. Throughout the year, York Region has implemented various measures to slow motorists down around schools. In 2012, Regional Council designated Community Safety Zones on Regional roads adjacent to all schools. The Community Safety Zone designation helps identify and advise motorists they are within a zone where public safety is of special concern, including school areas. Certain Highway Traffic Act fines (including speeding) are doubled in community safety zones. Community Safety Zone designations are reviewed annually to ensure any new or relocated schools are included. In December 2019, the Province proclaimed Bill 65, Safer School Zones Act, 2017, which is now in effect. Ontario Regulation 398/19 was also enacted under the Highway Traffic Act, allowing municipalities to operate automated speed enforcement in Community Safety Zones. Like many peer municipalities in Ontario, York Region is launching a two-year, automated speed enforcement (ASE) pilot, operational from 2021 to 2023 on a limited use basis, to determine the capacity of provincial courts to process the infractions, as well as a trial for the technology being used. The goal of the pilot is to increase safety in school areas while also changing driver behaviour. Under Highway Traffic Act Regulation 398/19, ASE is only authorized for use in school zones and Community Safety Zones. York Region is piloting one mobile ASE camera and rotating it on a monthly basis among 12 Community Safety Zones covering 19 schools across the Region. The sites were identified as the highest potential risk for school children by reviewing traffic volume, school population and travel speed. Advance public communication and automated speed enforcement warning signs have been installed at some sites to raise awareness of enforcement of speeding offences in Community Safety Zones. Installed ASE cameras will start issuing tickets at each location following a 90-day advance notification period. The operating time will be adjusted to accommodate infraction processing in the Region’s Provincial Offences Courts. A map of the 12 proposed ASE locations is shown on the following page. Page 761 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 85Page 762 86 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Roundabouts Superior safety performance and cost effectiveness Three roundabouts have been installed by the Region to address mobility needs. The first Regional roundabout was installed in fall 2013 at the intersection of York-Durham Line and Durham Regional Road 5 in the City of Markham, as shown in the image below. This was followed in 2016 with the implementation of roundabouts at Ninth Line and Bayberry Street in the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville and Lloydtown-Aurora Road and Keele Street in the Township of King. Two roundabouts on Regional roads have also been implemented by other jurisdictions; the Province at the intersection of Highway 48 and Bloomington Road and Durham Region at the intersection of Lake Ridge Road and Pefferlaw Road, both in 2019. YORK-DURHAM LINE AND DURHAM REGIONAL ROAD 5 ROUNDABOUT CONFIGURATION The following figure compares the three Regional roundabouts to intersections controlled by traffic signals and all-way stops, and demonstrates a roundabout’s superior safety performance even though they generally handle higher volumes than all way stop controlled intersections. Page 763 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 87 COLLISIONS AT TRAFFIC SIGNALS, ALL-WAY STOPS AND ROUNDABOUTS *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports Although initial costs to construct a roundabout are much higher than a traffic signal, in the long-term, a roundabout is more cost-effective by eliminating traffic signal operating costs, reducing societal costs from lower collision rates, lowering collision severity and improving efficiency of the intersection. The Region will continue to consider roundabouts when reviewing intersection improvement opportunities given their benefits over other traffic controls under specific circumstances. Page 764 88 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Red Light Cameras Red light cameras began with 20 cameras in 2013 and expanded to 40 in 2017. Over the years, the red light camera program has shown positive impact in reducing right-angle collisions Region-wide at those signalized intersections; from 1,466 annual right angle collisions before 2013 to 698 after 2017; a reduction of 52%. Overall, Region-wide right angle collisions at signalized intersections were reduced by 31% one year after the deployment of red light cameras, and by 46% two years after. Experience in other jurisdictions suggests the red light camera program should aim for a 25% to 30% reduction in overall right angle collisions over time. YORK REGION RIGHT-ANGLE COLLISION REDUCTION AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports To determine which locations will most benefit from red light cameras, staff continue to monitor the performance of the program and will relocate some cameras to new locations to maximize program effectiveness. Red light camera locations are selected based on the following: • Ranking locations with high right angle exposure using a risk analysis that takes into account volume, speed and road geometry • Identify locations that experience high numbers of right angle collision types that a red light camera may reduce • Performing conflict analysis through video observation to confirm red light running incidents at candidate locations • Removing intersections that are part of major construction projects for prolonged periods, as red light cameras are not effective in construction areas In 2019, five red light cameras were relocated, including reinstating two locations following completion of rapidway construction. Six red light cameras will be relocated in 2020 and 2021. The 29 existing red light camera locations, 11 decommission sites and 11 new or reinstated locations maps are shown on the following two pages. Page 765 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 89Page 766 90 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Page 767 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 91 Collision Frequency and Severity York Region’s 2010 to 2019 collision statistics show a continuous decreasing trend in total collisions since 2010, with a 10-year low in number of motor vehicle accidents of just over 7,000 collisions in 2019. Despite a continued increasing trend in daily traffic volumes to over 2.65 million trips per day and a forecasted growth by 2% annually. Collisions with property damage only and no injuries, accounted for 73% of all collisions. Changes in reporting limits for minor collisions for damage from $1,000 to $2,000 in 2015 may have resulted in a reduced number of total collisions reported to the police. A collision density map showing the locations of all reported motor vehicle accidents on Regional roads from 2017 to 2019 is shown on the following page. Page 768 92 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Page 769 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 93 COLLISION FREQUENCY BETWEEN 2010 AND 2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Injury collisions are decreasing While total collision statistics show a decreasing trend, the number of injury collisions has also generally decreased since 2011, despite experiencing a spike in 2016 with over 2,200 injury collisions. In 2019, the number of injury collisions further dropped to a decade low, with less than 1,900 injury collisions. The decrease in injury collisions can be partially attributed to advancements in vehicle safety features and technology, such as brake assist, forward collision warning, automated emergency braking, blind spot warning, lane departure warning, and lane keep assist, but also to strengthened legislation, increased fines and road safety programs. Page 770 94 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT FREQUENCY OF FATAL COLLISIONS, BETWEEN 2010 AND 2019 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports *Number of trips is based on TTS studies and the Region’s PCS data Fatal collisions can spike in any given year The number of fatal collisions continues to show fluctuations year-over-year. After the Region experienced a 10-year low in fatal collisions in 2017, with a total of 12 fatalities, numbers rose to 19 in 2019, the highest since 2012. Fatal collisions are events that have a tendency to spike in any given year. The 2017- 2019 fatal collision locations map is illustrated on the following page. Page 771 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 95Page 772 96 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT Top 10 High Collision Locations by Town/City The 2017 to 2019 top ten collision frequency locations in York Region continued to be those situated at intersections along high volume arterial corridors, including Highway 7, Major Mackenzie Drive, Rutherford Road/16th Avenue, Davis Drive, Green Lane and Yonge Street. Eight of the top 10 locations were also noted as hot spots in last year’s report. These arterial roads are York Region’s most travelled roadways providing a continuous link between York Region and Peel Region, Durham Region and Simcoe County, and connecting Regional roads to Highways 11, 427, 400, 404 and 407. TOP 10 HIGHEST COLLISION FREQUENCY LOCATIONS, THREE-YEAR TOTAL, 2017-2019 Description (Rank in Previous Report)Three-Year Injury Collisions Three-Year Total Collisions 1. Highway 7 and Weston Road (1)24 101 2. Highway 7 and Keele Street (4)15 93 3. Yonge Street and Green Lane (2)17 84 4. Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road (6)24 83 5. Weston Road and Rutherford Road (3)20 80 6. Major Mackenzie Drive East and Bayview Avenue (10)23 80 7. Davis Drive West and Bathurst Street (8)24 79 8. Yonge Street and Carrville Road/16th Avenue(7)15 72 9. Yonge Street and Major Mackenzie Drive (11)15 72 10. Highway 7 and Jane Street (13)11 70 *Collision data is from YRP MVA reports With the support of York Region Council, for the past few years York Region has invested millions of dollars on road capital projects along these most travelled roadways. Projects include road reconstruction, road widening, bus rapid transit lanes and vivaNext station construction, intersection upgrades and improvements to enhance traffic operations, to improve safety for all road users. York Region is investing $3.1billion in the Regional transportation network over the next 10 years. Page 773 Top Ten Collision Locations in York Region The following maps illustrate the top ten collision locations in York Region and for each of the nine local municipalities for the three-year period 2017 to 2019. • York Region • Town of Aurora • Town of East Gwillimbury • Town of Georgina • Township of King • City of Markham • Town of Newmarket • City of Richmond Hill • City of Vaughan • Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville Page 774 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 98TOP 10 COLLISION LOCATIONS IN YORK REGION1. Highway 7 and Weston Road (*101)2. Keele Street and Highway 7 (*93)3. Yonge Street and Green Lane East/ Green Lane West (*84)4. Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road (*83)5. Weston Road and Rutherford Road (*80)6. Major Mackenzie Drive East and Bayview Avenue (*80)7. Davis Drive West and Bathurst Street (*79)8. Yonge Street and Carrville Road/ 16th Avenue (*72)9. Yonge Street and Major Mackenzie Drive West/Major Mackenzie Drive East (*72)10. Highway 7 at Jane Street (*70)* Represents the number of collisions between 2017 and 2019Page 775 99 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORTTOP 10 COLLISION LOCATIONS IN THE TOWN OF AURORA1. Yonge Street and Wellington Street East/West (*64)2. Leslie Street and Wellington Street East (*42)3. Wellington Street East amd Bayview Avenue (*37)4. Bathurst Street and 15th Sideroad/Bloomington Road (*37)5. St John’s Sideroad and Bayview Avenue (*34)6. Wellington Street East and Mary Street/ John West Way (*31)7. Wellington Street West and Bathurst Street (*31)8. Yonge Street and St John’s Sideroad (*28)9. Wellington Street East and Industrial Parkway North/Industrial Parkway South (*23)10. Wellington Street East between Industrial Parkway North/Industrial Parkway South and Mary Street/John West Way (*18)* Represents the number of collisions between 2017 and 2019Page 776 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 100TOP 10 COLLISION LOCATIONS IN THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY1. Yonge Street and Green Lane East/ Green Lane West (*84)2. Leslie Street and Green Lane East (*62)3. Woodbine Avenue and Ravenshoe Road (*60)4. Green Lane East and Main Street North/ 2nd Concession Road (*50)5. Green Lane East between East Gwillimbury GO Station and Old Green Lane (*27)6. Highway 11 and Bathurst Street (*23)7. Highway 11 between Sherwood Glen and Bathurst Street (*22)8. Woodbine Avenue and Davis Drive (*20)9. Green Lane East and Harry Walker Parkway (*17)10. Green Lane West & Miller’s Sideroad/ Bathurst Street (*15)* Represents the number of collisions between 2017 and 2019Page 777 101 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORTTOP 10 COLLISION LOCATIONS IN THE TOWN OF GEORGINA1. Woodbine Avenue and Ravenshoe Road (*60)2. Woodbine Avenue and Morton Avenue/Pollock Road (*22)3. Ravenshoe Road between Woodbine Avenue and Warden Avenue (*21)4. Woodbine Avenue and Glenwoods Avenue (south leg) (*11)5. Dalton Road and Black River Road (*11)6. Woodbine Avenue and Arlington Drive (*11) 7. Woodbine Avenue between Arlington Drive and Morton Avenue/Pollock Road (*11)8. Baseline Road between Woodbine Avenue and Civic Centre Road (*11)9. Woodbine Avenue between Ravenshoe Road and Glenwoods Avenue (*11)10. Dalton Road between McDonough Avenue/High Street and Black River Road (*10)* Represents the number of collisions between 2017 and 2019Page 778 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 102TOP 10 COLLISION LOCATIONS IN THE TOWNSHIP OF KING1. Davis Drive West and Bathurst Street (*79)2. King Road and Bathurst Street (*38)3. Bathurst Street and 15th Sideroad/Bloomington Road (*37)4. King Road and Jane Street (*37)5. Bathurst Street and 18th Sideroad/St. John’s Sideroad (*31)6. Wellington Street West and Bathurst Street (*31)7. Highway 11 between Bathurst Street and Kalvers Street (*30)8. King Road and Dufferin Street (*27)9. King Road and Highway 27 (*26)10. Keele Street and King Road (*24)* Represents the number of collisions between 2017 and 2019Page 779 103 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORTTOP 10 COLLISION LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF MARKHAM1. Highway 7 at Warden Avenue (*66)2. Highway 7 at Kennedy Road (*62)3. Highway 7 and Main Street Markham South/Main Street Markham North (*61)4. Kennedy Road and 14th Avenue (*58)5. 16th Avenue and Main Street Markham North/Highway 48 (*57)6. Highway 7 and McCowan Road (*57)7. McCowan Road and 16th Avenue (*53)8. Warden Avenue and 14th Avenue/ Alden Road (*52)9. Highway 7 and Woodbine Avenue (*52)10. 16th Avenue and Woodbine Avenue (*52)* Represents the number of collisions between 2017 and 2019Page 780 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 104TOP 10 COLLISION LOCATIONS IN THE TOWN OF NEWMARKET1. Davis Drive West and Bathurst Street (*79)2. Yonge Street and Mulock Drive (*61)3. Yonge Street and Davis Drive/ Davis Drive West (*59)4. Mulock Drive and Bayview Avenue/Prospect Street (*43)5. Leslie Street and Davis Drive (*40)6. Yonge Street and Eagle Street/ Eagle Street West (*37)7. Davis Drive and Harry Walker Parkway/ Harry Walker Parkway South (*33)8. Yonge Street and Kingston Road/ Dawson Manor Boulevard (*33)9. Davis Drive and Lundy’s Lane/ Prospect Street (*30)10. Bathurst Street and Mulock Drive (*30)* Represents the number of collisions between 2017 and 2019Page 781 105 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORTTOP 10 COLLISION LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF RICHMOND HILL1. Major Mackenzie Drive East and Bayview Avenue (*80)2. Yonge Street and Carrville Road/ 16th Avenue (*72)3. Yonge Street and Major Mackenzie Drive West/Major Mackenzie Drive East (*72)4. Major Mackenzie Drive West and Bathurst Street (*62)5. Yonge Street and Elgin Mills Road West/Elgin Mills Road East (*61)6. Bathurst Street at Carrville Road/ Rutherford Road (*56)7. Highway 7 and Leslie Street (*51)8. Bayview Avenue and 16th Avenue (*49)9. Yonge Street and Garden Avenue/ Highway 7 - Yonge Street Ramp (*46)10. Leslie Street and Major Mackenzie Drive East (*42)* Represents the number of collisions between 2017 and 2019Page 782 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORT | 106TOP 10 COLLISION LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF VAUGHAN1. Highway 7 and Weston Road (*101)2. Keele Street and Highway 7 (*93)3. Islington Avenue and Rutherford Road (*83)4. Weston Road and Rutherford Road (*80)5. Highway 7 and Jane Street (*70)6. Rutherford Road and Sweetriver Boulevard (*69)7. Highway 27 and Rutherford Road (*69)8. Edgeley Boulevard/Interchange Way and Highway 7 (*69)9. Major Mackenzie Drive West and Weston Road (*69)10. Highway 7 and Pine Valley Drive (*66)* Represents the number of collisions between 2017 and 2019Page 783 107 | 2020 TRAVELLER SAFETY REPORTTOP 10 COLLISION LOCATIONS IN THE TOWN OF WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE1. Stouffville Road and Warden Avenue (*25)2. Woodbine Avenue and Davis Drive (*20)3. Woodbine Avenue and Bloomington Road (*18)4. Woodbine Avenue and Stouffville Road (*18)5. Stouffville Road between Warden Avenue and Kennedy Road (*18)6. Kennedy Road and Stouffville Road (*17)7. Kennedy Road and Vivian Road (*15)8. Bloomington Road and Highway 48 (*14)9. Stouffville Road and McCowan Road (*13)10. Bloomington Road btwn McCowan Road and Highway 48 (*13)* Represents the number of collisions between 2017 and 2019Page 784 TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 17250 Yonge Street, Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 6Z1 1-877-464-9675 ext. 75000 transportation@york.ca Page 785 Towards Zero: The Safest Roads in the World January 2016 Page 786 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................3 2 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................3 3 ROAD SAFETY STRATEGY 2025 ......................................................................................................4 3.1 The Vision ........................................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Strategic Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Principles .......................................................................................................................................... 5 4 RISK GROUPS, CONTRIBUTING FACTORS AND INTERVENTIONS .....................................................7 4.1 Key Risk Groups................................................................................................................................ 7 4.2 Key Contributing Factors .................................................................................................................. 8 4.3 Road Safety Interventions ................................................................................................................ 9 4.3.1 Road User Initiatives ............................................................................................................... 10 4.3.2 Road Infrastructure Initiatives ................................................................................................ 10 4.3.3 Vehicle Initiatives .................................................................................................................... 10 4.3.4 Assessment Tool ..................................................................................................................... 10 5 MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE OF THE STRATEGY ................................................................ 11 5.1 Updating and ownership................................................................................................................ 11 5.2 Ten year timeframe ....................................................................................................................... 11 5.3 Reporting ....................................................................................................................................... 11 6. REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 12 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING BEST PRACTICES ................................................. 13 Canadian Council of Motor Transportation Administrators © January 2016 ISBN 978-1-927993-13-2 Page 787 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 3 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Road Safety Strategy (RSS) 2025 is similar to its predecessors in a number of ways. It retains the long- term vision of Making Canada’s roads the safest in the world but combines this with the vision of Towards Zero. As well, a number of principles key to the strategy’s success have been aligned with international best practices in road safety. These principles include adopting the Safe System Approach, having a 10-year strategy and providing an inventory of proven and promising best practices to address key risk groups and contributing factors. RSS 2025 continues with a flexible approach to allow for jurisdictions to implement road safety programs that meet their own specific needs. The RSS 2025 strategy is intended to encourage road safety stakeholders from all levels of government as well as private sector and non-governmental stakeholders to collaborate in making Canada’s roads the safest in the world and unite efforts to reach our long-term vision of zero fatalities and serious injuries on our roads. 2 INTRODUCTION Each year in Canada, about 2,000 people are killed and 165,000 are injured, (10,000 seriously), while using our road transportation system and costs society $37 billion (2.2% of Canadian GDP) annually (1). Addressing road crash casualties is a challenge that each country in the world is facing. Making improvements to our road system of users, infrastructure and vehicles can reduce the number of Canadians that will die or be injured on our roads. Canada is one of the first countries in the world to adopt a national road safety strategy and to date, three national strategies have been implemented. Road Safety Vision (RSV) 2001, was Canada’s inaugural national road safety strategy adopted by the Council of Ministers Responsible for Transportation and Highway Safety in 1996. The progress made during RSV 2001 can be measured by the 10% decrease in fatalities and 16% decline in serious injuries despite steady increases in the road user population (2). In 2001, the second strategy, Road Safety Vision (RSV) 2010 was approved by the Council of Ministers. The vision and strategic objectives of this second road safety strategy were based on RSV 2001 and a decision was made to include an overall national target and sub-targets. The quantitative targets were intended to provide road safety stakeholders with key road safety indicators, against which the impact of intervention efforts could be measured. The national target called for a 30% decrease in the average number of road users killed and seriously injured during the 2008-2010 period compared to 1996-2001 baseline figures. The proposed reductions in sub-targets ranged from 20% to 40% and addressed the specific areas of occupant protection, impaired driving, commercial vehicle safety, vulnerable road users, speed and intersection safety, rural roadways, young drivers and high-risk drivers. It was expected that the achievement of these sub-targets would further reduce Canada’s road fatality total to fewer than 2,100 by 2010. Although the 30% reduction in fatalities and serious injuries was not achieved by 2010, it was achieved soon after in 2011 (3). Page 788 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 4 Road Safety Strategy (RSS) 2015 was launched in 2011 as Canada’s third national strategy and built upon the previous road safety vision and strategic objectives. RSS 2015 approached road safety in a different way introducing the safer systems concept as a holistic way to tackle road user, vehicle and road infrastructure issues and moved away from having established numerical targets. A significant shift in this strategy was the introduction of a framework of best practices, consisting of a multi-cell matrix of key risk groups and contributing factors, along with an inventory of road safety initiatives that jurisdictions could adopt to address their specific jurisdictional priorities. Canadian jurisdictions were encouraged to develop their own road safety plans and to adopt interventions from the inventory to reduce fatalities and serious injuries, to meet their individual needs depending on their suitability, feasibility and acceptability. In 2013, the number of fatalities and serious injuries on Canada’s roads both decreased by 21% when compared to the 2006-2010 baseline period. When vehicle kilometres travelled are factored in, the reduction in fatality and serious injury rates are similar. According to the United Nations’ World Health Organization, “the best-performing countries have road fatality rates of around 5-7 killed per 100,000 population” (4). In 2012, Canada had a rate of 6.0 fatalities per 100,000 population (5). In 2012, Canada’s ranking among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member countries was 13th based on fatalities per billion vehicle kilometres traveled (6). Canada continues to see progress and the downward trends in fatalities and serious injuries during the 2011 to 2013 period are promising but there is a need to remain diligent and strive to remain focussed on making greater gains in improving Canada’s level of road safety. 3 ROAD SAFETY STRATEGY 2025 Road Safety Strategy (RSS) 2025 is Canada’s fourth national road safety strategy. The updated strategy is guided by the principles outlined in the report entitled: Towards Zero: Ambitious Road Safety Targets and the Safe System Approach. (7) Many of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries with leading road safety records have modeled their road safety performance on this multidisciplinary approach and it has come to be recognized as an international best practice in road safety. The purpose of the strategy is to continue our national effort in addressing important road safety issues in Canada by providing a framework for governments and other road safety stakeholders to establish their own road safety plans, objectives, and interventions to eliminate road crashes which result in serious injuries or fatalities. Page 789 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 5 3.1 The Vision The vision for Road Safety Strategy 2025 is “Towards Zero: Having the safest roads in the world”. This towards zero approach is coupled with Canada’s long standing goal of “Having the safest roads in the world”. It is based on an international best practice first adopted by Sweden in 1997, where Vision Zero was approved by their parliament and has permeated their approach to transportation ever since. This highly effective and innovative approach by Sweden has resulted in one of the lowest traffic-related fatality rates world-wide and its proven track record has resulted in other countries and municipal governments initiating similar approaches. The Towards Zero vision is not a target to be achieved by a certain date but rather it is aspirational in nature. This vision will continue beyond the RSS 2025’s timelines and highlights the desire for the best road safety outcomes for all Canadian jurisdictions, provincial, territorial or municipal. 3.2 Strategic Objectives The following strategic objectives form the cornerstone of RSS 2025 and focus on safer road users, road infrastructure and vehicles: Raising public awareness and commitment to road safety, Improving communication, cooperation and collaboration among stakeholders, Enhancing legislation and enforcement, Improving road safety information in support of research and evaluation, Improving the safety of vehicles and road infrastructure, and Leveraging technology and innovation. 3.3 Principles The development of the strategy is based on the following key guiding principles: Adopt a safe system approach The Safe System Approach (SSA) is a means by which many countries leading in road safety are achieving their visions of eliminating deaths and serious injuries. SSA has the following principles: Ethics: human life and health are paramount and take priority over mobility and other objectives of the road traffic system (i.e., life and health can never be exchanged for other benefits within the society); Responsibility: providers and regulators of the road traffic system share responsibility with users; Safety: road traffic systems should take account of human fallibility and minimize both the opportunities for errors and the harm done when they occur; and Mechanisms for change: providers and regulators must do their utmost to guarantee the safety of all citizens; they must cooperate with road users; and all three must be ready to change to achieve safety. Page 790 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 6 It is recognized that Canadian jurisdictions will implement the SSA in a manner that is appropriate to their environment. Figure 1.1 .Source: This diagram is Canadian version adapted from the 2009 WHO report on the Global Status on Road Safety which was in turn modified from work commissioned by the Government of Western Australia. Downward trend towards zero RSS 2025 seeks to achieve directional downward trends in the rate-based number of fatalities and serious injuries rather than in the actual numbers of fatalities and serious injuries. These trends will be measured at the national level annually using multi-year rolling averages to smooth out short-term fluctuations since year-over-year reductions may not be practical or attainable. Two rate-based indicators commonly used internationally are fatalities and serious injuries per 100,000 population (World Health Organization, 2014) and fatalities and serious injuries per billion kilometres travelled (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and International Transport Forum, 2012). In Canada, the rate-based indicators will be: 1. fatalities and serious injuries per billion kilometres travelled, and 2. fatalities and serious injuries per one hundred thousand population. Page 791 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 7 Although the strategy does not include hard quantitative targets, it does not preclude individual jurisdictions or organizations from establishing their own targets when there is government, law enforcement and/or road safety stakeholder support for doing so. Best practices It is important that Canadian jurisdictions have the ability to adopt road safety initiatives without having to research best practices individually. As such, core to the strategy is an inventory of best practices interventions that have been used by the leading road safety countries and found to be effective in reducing fatalities and serious injuries. In order to support national consistency and allow jurisdictions to reference the best practices for their own road safety plans, the CCMTA has developed an on-line inventory at roadsafetystrategy.ca. 4 RISK GROUPS, CONTRIBUTING FACTORS AND INTERVENTIONS The following key risk groups and contributing factors have been identified based on emerging trends and research and analysis conducted over Canada’s last three road safety strategies. 4.1 Key Risk Groups The key risk groups are defined as follows: Risk Group Definition Young/Novice Drivers Drivers who are under the age of 25 or have less than 2 years driving experience. Medically at Risk Drivers Drivers with physical or cognitive impairments which affect a person’s ability to operate vehicles safely. Vulnerable Road Users Pedestrians, motorcyclists, cyclists and persons in personal mobilized devices (e.g., motorized wheelchairs and scooters). Commercial Drivers Drivers of heavy commercial vehicles (e.g., vehicles over 4,586 kg or passenger transportation). High Risk Drivers Repeat offenders with a pattern of illegal driving behaviours (e.g., recurring incidences of alcohol/drug impaired driving, traffic violations, collision involvement, or suspended/prohibited drivers). General Population Road users who benefit from strategies, interventions, regulations, and legislation introduced to make roads, vehicles and road users safer. Page 792 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 8 4.2 Key Contributing Factors The key factors contributing to collisions are defined as follows: Contributing Factor Definition Distracted Driving Distracted driving occurs when a driver’s attention is diverted from the driving task by secondary activities (e.g., eating, talking to passengers, talking or texting on electronic communication devices (ECDs) such as cell phones and smart phones). Alcohol Impaired Driving Physical or cognitive impairment of a road user which is caused by the consumption of alcohol. Drug Impaired Driving Physical or cognitive impairment of a road user which is caused by the consumption of psychotropic drugs (e.g., cannabis, prescription drugs, narcotics, etc.). Fatigue Impaired Drivers Fatigue is a general state caused by lack of sleep, time of day, time on task, or task monotony which diminishes the ability to drive by altering alertness and vigilance. Speed and Aggressive Drivers Includes driving at speeds beyond posted legal limits or driving too fast for road conditions and driver behaviours which are deemed illegal or outside socially acceptable norms which put other road users at risk (e.g., tailgating, improper passing, failure to signal, etc.). Unrestrained Occupants Includes factors pertaining to proper restraint use by all road users (e.g., seat belts, child safety seats, booster seats). Environmental Factors Includes factors that may affect the likelihood or severity of crash occurrence (e.g. weather conditions, wildlife on road). Road Infrastructure Includes factors that may affect the likelihood or severity of crash occurrence (e.g., roadway configuration, road construction, road surface condition, road and roadside design, lighting and signage). Vehicle Factors Includes factors related to vehicle design (e.g., crash avoidance, crashworthiness), maintenance, recalls, aftermarket vehicle equipment, commercial vehicles, unusual vehicles, automated vehicles, new and emerging vehicle technologies. Page 793 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 9 It should be noted that there may be significant overlap in these risk groups and contributing factors (e.g., high risk drivers and alcohol impaired driving) and that their priority may change over time. Jurisdictions are encouraged to monitor emerging issues and use appropriate interventions as needed to ensure their initiatives are effective and innovative. A visual of the matrix can be found on the Road Safety Strategy 2025 website. 4.3 Road Safety Interventions For each risk group and contributing factor, there may be more than one intervention for promoting safer road users, safer infrastructure and safer vehicles. A combination of interventions could result in even greater improvements to safety. The interventions are categorized as follows: Intervention Type Definition Policy/Legislation/ Regulation Includes evidence-based jurisdictional policies, laws, and regulations intended to improve road user behaviour and the safety of the road infrastructure and vehicles. Education/ Training Includes activities that provide knowledge and/or test the capacity of a person to demonstrate appropriate behaviour with respect to road safety (e.g., proactive and remedial education, driver training, child restraint training). Communication/ Awareness Includes any activities that contribute to increased awareness and knowledge of key road safety issues by the general public or target audience that may lead to safer road user behaviour. (e.g., ad campaigns, social media, etc.). Enforcement Includes activities carried out by enforcement agencies in order to apprehend offenders and to raise the perceived likelihood of being apprehended (e.g., enhanced Check Stops, Selective Traffic Enforcement Programs (STEP), intelligence- based enforcement, automated enforcement, commercial vehicle inspections). Information/Data/ Research Includes capturing and compiling complete, uniform and timely data (e.g., crash, trauma, exposure) to expedite the identification of emerging trends/issues for the further development of evidence-based road safety interventions. This also includes the evaluation of road safety measures and the monitoring of road safety indicators over time. Technology Includes using technology and innovation to improve the safety of the driver (e.g., installment of alcohol ignition interlock, speed and red light cameras); vehicle (e.g., electronic stability control, side curtains and airbags) and infrastructure. (e.g., Intelligent Transportation Systems, roundabouts). Page 794 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 10 Intervention Type Definition Linkages Includes the establishment of linkages between jurisdictional, national or international governmental and non-governmental organizations with a vested interest in road safety. This will foster partnerships, knowledge sharing and best practice guidelines, and improve cooperation and collaboration among key road safety stakeholders (e.g., police, health professionals, etc.). The CCMTA’s on-line inventory of best practices contains “proven practices” for reducing or preventing fatalities and injuries. In addition to these, many other potentially good initiatives have been reviewed but are considered too “young” to demonstrate effectiveness in reducing fatalities and serious injuries and hence are considered to be “promising”. These proven and promising practices can be at found at roadsafetystrategy.ca. 4.3.1 Road User Initiatives The inventory includes a number of road user interventions that have been proven to be effective or at least are considered to be promising in addressing the challenges of dealing with those who drink and drive, speed or drive aggressively, refrain from buckling up, or drive while distracted. 4.3.2 Road Infrastructure Initiatives The road infrastructure elements are diverse and depending on the initiative, can address rural and urban situations, focusing on the road and the roadside. The objective of infrastructure initiatives is to reduce the likelihood and/or the severity of a collision recognizing that despite best efforts, human errors will occur. Many of these initiatives have been evaluated and, as such, their effect on fatalities and serious injuries after implementation has been proven. The inventory also includes promising initiatives. 4.3.3 Vehicle Initiatives Road safety advances for vehicle safety may be realized through innovative measures adopted by the vehicle manufacturers as well as the passing of Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (CMVSS). Adoption of new vehicle technologies (e.g., electronic stability control, brake assist) can also be advanced through consumer demand for safety improvements based on New Car Assessment Programs. 4.3.4 Proven and Promising Initiatives Assessment Tool CCMTA has developed an assessment tool to determine whether initiatives are proven or promising by identifying: Page 795 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 11 characteristics of initiatives being considered; performance measures, where available; evaluations or cost benefit/cost-effective analysis, where available; and initiatives that address the various risk groups and contributing factors. The assessment tool used to evaluate initiatives can be referenced in Appendix A. The initiatives are intended to be used by CCMTA and its member jurisdictions and other stakeholders as a reference for the development of their own policy and programs. 5 MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE OF THE STRATEGY 5.1 Updating and ownership As custodian of the RSS 2025, the CCMTA, working through the jurisdictions and its committees, task forces, and working groups, will be responsible for maintaining, updating and reporting on the strategy. Given the strategy’s approach, these up-dates may include progress on new research projects, identifying new initiatives, key risk groups or contributing factors. It is recommended that each jurisdiction develop its own provincial/territorial action plans, and in creating these plans, utilize the appropriate strategies that have been proven effective in Canada and elsewhere. 5.2 Ten year timeframe A 10-year timeframe was chosen for RSS 2025 for the following reasons: CCMTA’s experience with past RSSs has shown that a longer timeframe is essential to set the strategy up for success by allowing for policies to be introduced and implemented over a longer time period; an extended timeframe takes into account the reality that collision data collection can take up to 2-3 years, making it difficult to identify road safety trends in a 5-year period. A mid-term review of the strategy will be scheduled after the fifth year of RSS 2025 (i.e. 2020). In order to keep the strategy’s 10-year approach relevant and front and centre for all stakeholders, annual reporting on progress and evaluations of road safety initiatives is essential. 5.3 Reporting CCMTA will produce a report (based on Transport Canada’s annual fatality and serious injury data) on progress using rate-based indicators for fatalities and serious injury rates as well as key risk groups and contributing factors. Additionally, CCMTA will also report on qualitative measures on an annual basis. Page 796 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 12 6. REFERENCES 1. Transport Canada, 2015 Draft Report on the Social Costs of Collisions in Canada, 1996-2012. 2. Transport Canada, 2004, Road Safety Vision 2010, 2002 Annual Report. 3. Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators, Road Safety Vision 2010, Final Report, November 2013 4. OECD and International Transport Forum, Transport Research Centre, Towards Zero: Ambitious Road Safety Targets and the Safe System Approach. 2008. 5. Transport Canada (2015a) Canadian Motor Vehicle Collision Statistics: 2013. 6. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and International Transport Forum, Road Safety Annual Report 2014. 7. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and International Transport Forum (2008), Transport Research Centre, Towards Zero: Ambitious Road Safety Targets and the Safe System Approach. Page 797 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 13 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING BEST PRACTICES SECTION ONE: Recommended Initiative Initiative Title: Synopsis: Applicable uses according to target group: Applicable uses according to causal factor: Applicable uses according to strategies: SECTION TWO: Performance Measures Yes No Were any evaluations, cost/benefit analyses, or cost effectiveness analyses conducted? If yes, please indicate the author, title, source, and/or web-link where the cost- benefit/cost-effective analyses can be located. Works Cited Scope of the Problem Evidence SECTION THREE: Evidence LEGEND EVALUATION How would you rate the research- based evidence that might support this initiative? Demonstrated to be effective by one or more high-quality evaluations with consistent results (systemic review, multi- centre studies) Demonstrated to be effective in certain situations Likely to be effective based on balance of evidence from high- quality evaluations or other sources Effectiveness still undetermined; different methods of implementing this countermeasure produce different results Limited or poor-quality evaluation evidence (descriptive studies, case studies, expert opinion, studies of poor methodological quality) Page 798 Canada’s Road Safety Strategy 2025 Page 14 SECTION FOUR: Scoring and Recommendation PROVEN Must have at least 4-5 stars for question 3 PROMISING Must have at least 2-3 stars for questions 3 NOT ACCEPTED No evaluations, cost/benefit analyses, or cost effectiveness analyses It is recommended that this initiative be attributed the following rating with respect to including it into the RSS 2025 on-line inventory. Page 799 NTDSW 2021 Backgrounder What is National Teen Driver Safety Week? As Canada’s national injury prevention organization, Parachute is proud to present the ninth annual National Teen Driver Safety Week (NTDSW), an awareness week designed to build public awareness of teen driver safety issues and encourage communities to be part of the solution. Parachute's goal is for Canadians to have a long life, lived to the fullest. NTDSW provides the tools to take this important messaging to the community. Our messages and resources allow stakeholders and partners to prioritize teen driver safety issues in their communities, engage people in the conversation about teen driver safety and create change around this big issue. National Teen Driver Safety Week 2021: October 17 to 23 Parachute is excited to hold our ninth annual NTDSW from October 17 to 23, 2021, where we hope to keep the great momentum going from the 2020 campaign. Keeping with the same theme, this year the primary focus is on the critical issue of speeding among teens. Our additional messaging is around drug-impaired, drunk, distracted and aggressive driving, and rail safety. We will encourage teens, parents and community partners to join the conversation on social media, using the hashtags #SpeedIsNoGame and #NTDSW2021. Similar to NTDSW 2020, this year, due to physical distancing restrictions and limits on in-person gatherings, we will be holding a virtual campaign. Please visit parachute.ca/ntdsw or email info@parachute.ca for more information on how you can participate in NTDSW 2021. Teen Driver Safety: The Facts Road crashes are the third-leading cause of death among young people ages 15 to 24 in Canada1,2 and transport injuries for youth and young adults cost the Canadian economy $990 million in a single year 3. Knowing the risk factors and high-risk behaviours will help you identify countermeasures to keep teen drivers safe. Speeding means driving faster than the speed limit, but also driving too fast for roadconditions. Nearly a quarter of fatal collisions in Canada involve excessive speed ordriving too fast for conditions 4 Young drivers (aged 16 to 24) killed in a collision are more likely to be speeding at thetime of the crash than other age groups5 Speeding is a factor in one third of teen driver deaths in Canada 6 Speeding among young drivers is more prevalent at night and when there are other teenpassengers in the vehicle 7 Page 800 2 Excessive speeders, those who drive 25 km/h or more over the speed limit, are more likely to be young and male2 Drivers who speed excessively are at higher risk for crashes and are associated with other risky behaviours such as drinking and not wearing a seatbelt2 Crashes at higher speeds cause more severe injuries than crashes at lower speeds 8. The force created by high-speed crashes can be too much for seatbelts, airbags and the vehicle structure to protect drivers and passengers. Pedestrians struck by a driver at higher speeds are less likely to survive than when struck at lower speeds. At 30 km/h, the risk of pedestrian fatality is 5 per cent. At 50 km/h, the risk of fatality is nearly six times higher, at 29 per cent. Teens drivers killed in a crash are more likely than any other age group to test positive for cannabis 9 Alcohol is a factor in almost half of fatal crashes among 16- to 25-year-olds 10 Drivers under 25 are more likely than any other age group to use a device while driving 11, increasing the risk of a collision. Trespassing on a railway is illegal and is a leading factor in railway-related deaths and injuries. In 2020, 67 per cent of all rail incidents involving trespassers were fatal and 33 per cent resulted in serious injury.12 Teen Driver Safety and Vision Zero No speeding deaths are acceptable on our roads. Strategies and policies that have proven to be effective prevention against speeding include safe street design, automated speed enforcement, and safer speed limits 13. Efforts such as NTDSW seek to advocate and educate in support of these evidence-based approaches. Learn more about the Vision Zero approach to road safety at parachute.ca/visionzero #SpeedIsNoGame #NTDSW2021 Help us prevent the tragedy of serious injury and death in car crashes. For more information, visit parachute.ca/ntdsw 1 Parachute. (2021). Potential lost, potential for change: The cost of injury in Canada 2021. https://parachute.ca/en/professional-resource/cost-of-injury-in-canada/ 2 Statistics Canada. Table 13-10-0394-01 Leading causes of death, total population, by age group. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310039401 3 Parachute. (2021). Potential lost, potential for change: The cost of injury in Canada 2021. https://parachute.ca/en/professional-resource/cost-of-injury-in-canada/ 4 TIRF. (2018). Sharing the road: key factors in fatal crashes in Canada. https://tirf.ca/TIRFCAD18EE 5 TIRF. (2018). Collisions Among Fatally Injured Drivers of Different Age Groups, 2000-2014. http://tirf.ca/wp- content/uploads/2018/08/Collisions-Among-Fatally-Injured-Drivers-of-Different-Age-Groups-2000-2014-7.pdf. Page 801 3 6 TIRF. (2015). Trends Among Fatally Injured Teen Drivers, 2000-2012. https://tirf.ca/wp- content/uploads/2017/01/Trends-Among-Fatally-Injured-Teen-Drivers-2000-2012_11_V6.pdf. 7 Ferguson, S. A. (2013). Speeding-related fatal crashes among teen drivers and opportunities for reducing the risks. Governors Highway Safety Association. https://www.ghsa.org/sites/default/files/2016-11/GHSA Teen SpeedingFinal.pdf. 8 World Health Organization. (2008). Speed management: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/speed-management-a-road-safety-manual-for-decision- makers-and-practitioners. 9 TIRF. (2019). Marijuana Use Among Drivers in Canada, 2000-2016. https://tirf.ca/wp- content/uploads/2019/11/Marijuana-Use-Among-Drivers-in-Canada-2000-2016-8.pdf. 10 Brown, S. W., Vanlaar, W. G. M., & Robertson, R. D. (2017). Alcohol and Drug-Crash Problem in Canada 2015 Report. Ottawa, ON: The Traffic Injury Research Foundation of Canada. https://ccmta.ca/web/default/files/PDF/2015_Alcohol_and_Drug_Crash_Problem_Report.FINAL_EN.pdf 11 CCMTA. (2018). Use of Electronic Communication Devices by Canadian Drivers: Combined Urban/Rural Sites (2016-2017). https://www.ccmta.ca/web/default/files/PDF/2016- 2017_Urban-Rural_ECD_Use_Survey_Report_-_JUNE_2018.pdf 12 Transportation Safety Board of Canada. (2020). Rail transportation occurrences in 2020. https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/stats/rail/2020/sser-ssro-2020.html 13 Vision Zero Network. (n.d.). Vision Zero success depends on managing speed for safety. https://visionzeronetwork.org/resources/safety-over-speed/ Page 802 From:MECP Land Policy (MECP) To:MECP Land Policy (MECP) Subject:Decision on the Proposed Land Use Compatibility Guideline Date:October 13, 2021 2:34:45 PM You don't often get email from mecp.landpolicy@ontario.ca. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL Good afternoon, Ontario is committed to preventing negative impacts from conflicting land uses within communities, such as the effects of industrial noise and odour pollution on residential areas. On May 4, 2021, Ontario proposed changes to the current land use compatibility guidelines (“D-Series guidelines”) that municipalities and other planning authorities use when making land use planning decisions. The proposed changes aimed to update, renew and consolidate our land use compatibility guidelines to help ensure proper compatibility studies are completed before new sensitive land uses, such as residences, are built near existing major facilities (including industries or industrial areas), and vice versa. During the 94-day consultation period, the ministry received over 500 comments. In response to the comments received, the ministry has decided to not move forward with this version of the proposed Land Use Compatibility Guideline. The current D- Series guidelines for land use compatibility will remain in effect and will continue to be the provincial guidelines referenced in the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe land use compatibility policies. Should the Ministry decide to update the D-Series, any potential future update will be posted to the Environmental Registry as a proposal for consultation. To review the decision notice for this proposal, please see the Environmental Registry at http://ero.ontario.ca/notice/019-2785. Please pass this information along to colleagues, members of your organization, other organizations, and anyone else that may be interested. If you have any questions, please e-mail mecp.landpolicy@ontario.ca. Sincerely, Original Signed by: Robyn Kurtes Director, Environmental Policy Branch Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Page 803 From:Wiggans, Paige To:Wiggans, Paige Cc:Piccinico, David Subject:Verify Ontario Business Kit Date:October 15, 2021 3:31:11 PM EXTERNAL As part of Ontario's ongoing fight against COVID-19, and in support of vital public health measures, the province is pleased to introduce Verify Ontario, Ontario's official, free app for verifying COVID-19 vaccine certificates. Verify Ontario is designed for businesses and organizations of all shapes and sizes. The app reduces the burden on business and makes it quicker and easier to confirm that visitors are fully vaccinated, at the door. Organizations can download this secure, privacy-protective, made-in-Ontario app from the Apple App and Google Play Stores, starting October 15, 2021. Verify Ontario works with both Apple (iOS11 or newer on iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch) and Android devices (Android 6 or newer). The app can be used without an internet connection to scan QR codes, but you must connect to the internet every week or so for the latest content and rules. How does it work? The app: · Accesses a device’s camera with permission to scan vaccine certificates with government-issued QR codes · Scans and reads the QR code that is printed on either a piece of paper or displayed on a phone screen · Displays a results screen, once it checks against proof of vaccination requirements · Does not track or save personal information or visitor location · Only collects data for metrics that are not connected to users (for example, number of scans) Get fast, clear results When you scan a visitor’s QR code on a paper or digital vaccine certificate, you will see one of three possible results: · a for “yes” (good to go) · a for “no” (does not meet proof of vaccination requirements) · a yellow warning triangle to signal an issue with the certificate (for example, it is not an accepted or it is an invalid QR code) Scans official QR codes Only official QR codes on vaccine certificates that meet the SMART Health Card standard for privacy and security can be read as valid proof of vaccination. This includes compatible QR codes from other provinces that follow this same standard, including Quebec and British Columbia. QR codes from third-party services are not scannable. Learn more, spread the word Page 804 You can learn more about Ontario’s official verification app at ontario.ca/verify. You can also access a marketing bundle on the website, or as attached here, to help spread the word about Verify Ontario. Thank you for your support in helping to keep people safe and Ontario open for business. Our businesses, big and small, are the engine of our economy. We value everything you do to make this province a great place to live, work and raise a family. Download. Scan. Show. And go. Let’s rebuild together, Ontario.   Paige Wiggans Executive Assistant Office of MPP David Piccini Member of Provincial Parliament Northumberland-Peterborough South 117 Peter Street, Port Hope L1A 1C5 P: 905-372-4000   Page 805 From:MECP Land Policy (MECP) To:MECP Land Policy (MECP) Cc:Lompart, Chris (MECP); Jandoo, Karan (MECP); Blease, Laura (MECP); Kureishy, Reema (MECP); Kurtes, Robyn (MECP) Subject:Excess Soil Webinar Series, Outreach Updates and Regulation Implementation Reminder Date:October 21, 2021 8:49:18 AM EXTERNAL Good morning, The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks encourages the reuse of excess soil for beneficial uses if it can be done in a way that protects human health and the environment. Ontario committed to set clear rules supporting appropriate beneficial reuse of excess soils, and in December 2019, the Ministry finalized a new excess soil regulation, O. Reg. 406/19: On-Site and Excess Soil Management, supported by risk- based standards, to support local reuse of excess soil. This regulation is being phased in, and the first part came into effect on January 1st, 2021. Additional significant parts of this regulation are scheduled to come into effect on January 1st, 2022. This includes: · For some moderately large projects generating excess soil and projects more likely to generate soil with contaminants: o Filing a notice in the online, public Excess Soil Registry before removing excess soil from the project area; and o Using a Qualified Person (QP) to complete: an Assessment of Past Uses and, if necessary, a Sampling and Analysis Plan and an Excess Soil Characterization Report to help understand the quality of excess soil from the project area; and an Excess Soil Destination Assessment Report to verify that intended reuse sites can accept the soil to be sent to them o Developing and applying a tracking system for excess soil during its transportation and deposit at a reuse site. · For larger reuse sites, filing a notice to the Registry and developing procedures to track and inspect each load of excess soil being received. · Implementing a hauling record for all movements of excess soil. Excess Soil Registry As noted above, as of January 1st, 2022, under the Excess Soil Regulation, project leaders, owners and site operators will be required to file notices to the Excess Soil Registry (the Registry) for certain projects, reuse sites, and residential development soil depot sites. The Resource Productivity & Recovery Authority (RPRA) is responsible for establishing, implementing and maintaining the Registry. The Registry will open for the regulated community to begin filing notices ahead of January 1st, 2022. For further information, as it is made available, on completion of the Registry, how to access the Registry, and how to file a notice, please visit RPRA’s website. Page 806 Fall Webinars and Meetings The ministry is providing a series of webinars on several topics through late October and November, as an opportunity for MECP to share topic-specific information and for stakeholders to ask questions on that topic. If you are interested in one of these topics, please register through the Eventbrite links provided below. More sessions may be made available on these or other topics based on demand: Topic Areas Date Registration Link 1. Project Area - Source Sites Wednesday October 27, 9am to 11am https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/193649850917 2. Reuse Sites Friday October 29, 9am to 11am https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/193863249197 3. Transportation of Excess Soil Wednesday November 3, 9am to 11am https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/194840803087 4. Infrastructure Projects Friday November 5, 9am to 11am https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/194861545127 5. Excess Soil Registry Regulatory Requirements Friday November 12, 9am to 11am https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/194856309467 6. Vac Trucks and Liquid Soil Management Friday November 19, 9am to 11am https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/194852648517 7. Qualified Persons (QP) and Excess Soil Planning Wednesday November 24, 9am to 11am https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/195058494207 8. Soil Depots and Storage Sites Friday November 26, 9am to 11am https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/195065946497 *Note: registration is required and there are limited spots available, so we ask that you register early and please limit the number of representatives attending from your units. The ministry will also continue to participate in events organized by other organizations for the regulated community.   Educational Materials To support implementation of the Excess Soil Regulation, the ministry is making educational materials available through the excess soil webpage of the ministry website. The ministry is developing a series of fact sheets to provide a plain language description of regulatory requirements along with best management practices. These factsheets will be available in the near future on this webpage. Additional educational materials to support regulatory implementation can also be found through the ministry’s excess soil web page. This includes, for example, ministry and OPS-developed best practices and guidance as well as links to guidance and other Page 807 materials developed by external partners. Please pass this e-mail along to colleagues, members of your organization, and other organizations that may be interested. If you have any questions about implementation of the Excess Soil Regulation, please contact us by e-mail at mecp.landpolicy@ontario.ca. Effective and efficient management and relocation of excess construction soil is essential to the ongoing development and modernization of our cities. We look forward to continuing to work collaboratively with external partners to share information, develop guidance and resources, and to ensure effective implementation of this regulation. Sincerely,   Robyn Kurtes Director, Environmental Policy Branch Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks   Page 808 From:Scott Butler To:Greentree, Anne Subject:Call for Nominations for 2022-2023 Good Roads Board of Directors Date:October 19, 2021 2:15:09 PM Attachments:image001.jpg image003.jpg Good Roads BoD - Call for Nominations for 2022-2023.pdf You don't often get email from scott@ogra.org. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL Anne Greentree Clerk Municipality of Clarington 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario L1C 3A6 Good afternoon Anne: Attached is a single PDF containing the call for nominations to join the 2022-2023 Good Roads Board of Directors. Please download the attachment and place it on your next Council agenda for information. Any member of Council or a permanent full-time staff from a Good Roads member municipality or First Nation who is interested in being considered as a candidate for a position on the Board of Directors must complete the attached Nomination Consent form found below and submit it along with a résumé to the attention of Rick Harms, Chair of the Nominating Committee no later than 1700 h Eastern Time on November 19, 2021. Nominations can be emailed to info@ogra.org or mailed to Good Roads, 1525 Cornwall Road, Unit 22, Oakville, Ontario L6J 0B2. The Nominating Committee will meet on November 24, 2021, to recommend a slate of directors to the membership. Questions regarding the nomination process or serving on the Board of Directors can be directed to Scott Butler at scott@ogra.org or 416-564-4319. Sincerely, Scott R. Butler Executive Director c: Rick Harms, Chair, Nominating Committee Page 809 1 Call for Nominations to the 2022-2023 Good Roads Board of Directors Pursuant to Good Roads Policy B-008, the Nominating Committee of the 2021-2022 Good Roads Board of Directors will present a slate of 11 directors to attendees at the Annual Good Roads Conference taking place February 27 – March 02, 2022, at the Fairmont Royal York in Toronto, Ontario. The Good Roads Board of Directors understands the strength that diversity provides and is committed to achieving equity and inclusion on its leadership team. Women and individuals from equity seeking groups are encouraged to apply. The following directors will automatically serve on the 2022-2023 Board of Directors:  President: Paul Schoppmann – Mayor, Municipality of St.-Charles;  First Vice-President: John Parsons – Division Manager, Roads Operations, City of London;  Second Vice-President: Bryan Lewis – Councillor, Town of Halton Hills; and  Immediate Past President: Dave Burton – Mayor, Municipality of Highlands East. The Nominating Committee will put forward a slate comprised from Good Roads’ municipal and First Nations membership. The slate will satisfy the geographic requirements prescribed in Section 12 of the Constitution as well as the criteria in Policy B-008. The Constitution can be viewed in its entirety on the Good Roads website. The following vacancies need to be filled: …/2 To: Head and Members of Council Chief and Council From: Scott Butler, Executive Director Date: October 14, 2021 Page 810 Call for Nominations to the 2022-2023 Good Roads Board of Directors 2 City of Toronto 1 Vacancy The City of Toronto Zone consists of the City of Toronto. Northern Zone 2 Vacancies The Northern Zone consists of the municipalities within and First Nations adjacent to the Districts of Algoma, Cochrane, Kenora, Manitoulin, Nipissing, Parry Sound, Rainy River, Sudbury, Thunder Bay and Timiskaming; municipalities in and including the District of Muskoka and the City of Greater Sudbury. South Central Zone 0 Vacancies The South Central Zone consists of the municipalities within and First Nations adjacent to the Counties of Dufferin, Grey, Simcoe, and Wellington, and municipalities in and including the Regional Municipalities of Durham, Halton, Niagara, Peel and York, and the City of Hamilton. Southeast Zone 2 Vacancies The Southeast Zone consists of the municipalities within and First Nations adjacent to the Counties of Frontenac, Haliburton, Hastings, Lanark, Leeds and Grenville, Lennox and Addington, Northumberland, Peterborough, Prescott and Russell, Prince Edward, Renfrew, and Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry, and the Cities of Kawartha Lakes and Ottawa. Southwest Zone 1 Vacancies The Southwest Zone consists of the municipalities within and First Nations adjacent to the Counties of Brant, Bruce, Elgin, Essex, Haldimand, Huron, Lambton, Middlesex, Norfolk, Oxford, and Perth, the municipality of Chatham-Kent, and municipalities in and including the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Those elected shall serve for a two-year term ending on Wednesday, February 28, 2024. Any member of Council or a permanent full-time staff from a Good Roads member municipality or First Nation who is interested in being considered as a candidate for a position on the Board of Directors must complete the attached Nomination Consent form found below and submit it along with a résumé to the attention of Rick Harms, Chair of the Nominating Committee no later than 1700 h Eastern Time on November 19, 2021. Nominations can be emailed to info@ogra.org or mailed to Good Roads, 1525 Cornwall Road, Unit 22, Oakville, Ontario L6J 0B2. The Nominating Committee will meet on November 24, 2021, to recommend a slate of directors to the membership. The Nominating Committee is comprised of the following directors: Chair: Rick Harms, Immediate Past President Vice Chair: Rick Kester, Past President Members: John Parsons, OGRA Second Vice-President Paul Ainslie, OGRA Director Cheryl Fort, OGRA Director Questions regarding the nomination process or serving on the Board of Directors can be directed to Scott Butler at scott@ogra.org or 416-564-4319. Sincerely, Scott Butler Executive Director c: Rick Harms, Chair, Nominating Committee Page 811 Nomination/Consent Form for the 2022-2023 Good Roads Board of Directors Nominee Name: Title: Municipality: Nominated by: Title: Municipality: Seconded by: Title: Municipality: Nominee Signature Date This form must be received e-mail (info@ogra.org) to the attention of Rick Harms, Chair of the Nominating Committee, by 1700 h Eastern Time on Friday, November 19, 2021. Page 812 You don't often get email from bonnie.adams@enbridge.com. Learn why this is important From:Chambers, Michelle To:Chambers, Michelle Subject:FW: EB-2021-0209 Enbridge Gas Inc. - 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing Program Application - OEB Notice of Application Date:October 22, 2021 10:17:01 AM Attachments:Notice_(EN)Enbridge 2022 FCPP_20211018.pdf Notice_(FR)Enbridge 2022 FCPP_20211018.pdf EGI_APPL_20210929.pdf Subject: EB-2021-0209 Enbridge Gas Inc. - 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing Program Application - OEB Notice of Application EXTERNAL To: Clerks of All Municipalities in which Enbridge Gas Inc. Supplies Gas On September 29, 2021 Enbridge Gas Inc. (Enbridge Gas) applied to the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) for approval to increase its rates effective April 1, 2022, to recover the costs associated with meeting its obligations under the federal government’s Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act. Enbridge Gas has also applied to recover from customers the balances in the related deferral and variance accounts as well as making changes to those accounts to recognize the change from the federal Output-Based Pricing System to the provincial Emissions Performance Standards. On October 18, 2021, the OEB issued the Notice of Application along with the Letter of Direction for the proceeding. The OEB has directed Enbridge to serve a copy of the Notice of Application along with the application and evidence on the clerks of all municipalities in which Enbridge Gas Inc. supplies gas. Attached please find the OEB’s Notice of Application (English and French) along with Enbridge Gas’ application and evidence as filed with the OEB. The OEB’s Notice of Application provides information on how to become informed and involved in the proceeding. Interested parties can apply to the OEB for Intervenor Status in this proceeding by November 5, 2021. The application and evidence can also be viewed on Enbridge’s website (EB-2021-0209 Enbridge Gas 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing Program Application). Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Bonnie Jean Adams Regulatory Coordinator Enbridge Gas Inc. Page 813 T: 416-495-5751 500 Consumers Road I North York Ontario I M2J 1P8 enbridgegas.com Safety. Integrity. Respect. Inclusion. Page 814 ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD NOTICE TO CUSTOMERS OF ENBRIDGE GAS INC. Enbridge Gas Inc. has applied to raise its natural gas rates effective April 1, 2022, to recover costs associated with the federal government’s Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, and to recover certain related account balances and other changes. Learn more. Have your say. Enbridge Gas Inc. (Enbridge Gas) has applied to the Ontario Energy Board for approval to increase its rates effective April 1, 2022, to recover the costs associated with meeting its obligations under the federal government’s Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act. Enbridge Gas has also applied to recover from customers the balances in the related deferral and variance accounts as well as making changes to those accounts to recognize the change from the federal Output-Based Pricing System to the provincial Emissions Performance Standards. The Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act establishes a carbon pricing program under which a natural gas utility in Ontario, such as Enbridge Gas, is required to pay a carbon charge to the federal government for emissions from the natural gas that it delivers to its customers, and for excess emissions from the operation of Enbridge Gas’s natural gas distribution system. The federal carbon charge came into effect on April 1, 2019, increased on April 1, 2020 and on April 1, 2021, and will increase again on April 1, 2022. Enbridge Gas Inc. says that if its application is approved as filed, it will have the following bill impacts: • A typical residential customer in the EGD rate zone (former customers of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc.) will see a bill increase of $47.81 beginning April 1, 2022. This is composed of a $47.05 yearly bill increase arising from the 2022 carbon charges, plus a one-time charge of $0.76, to recover the balances in the related deferral and variance accounts. • A typical residential customer in the Union South rate zone (former customers of Union Gas Limited), will see a bill increase of $43.41 beginning April 1, 2022. This is composed of a $43.14 yearly bill increase from the 2022 carbon charges, plus a one-time charge of $0.27, to recover the balances in the related deferral and variance accounts. • A typical residential customer in the Union North rate zone (former customers of Union Gas Limited), will see a bill increase of $43.48 beginning April 1, 2022. This is composed of a $43.14 yearly bill increase from the 2022 carbon charges, plus a one-time charge of $0.34, to recover the balances in the related deferral and variance accounts. Other customers, including businesses, may be affected. THE ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING The Ontario Energy Board (OEB) will hold a public hearing to consider the application filed by Enbridge Gas. During the hearing, which could be an oral or written hearing, we will question Enbridge Gas on its application. We will also hear questions and arguments from individuals that have registered to participate (called intervenors) in the OEB’s hearing. The OEB is an independent and impartial public agency. We make decisions that serve the public interest. Our goal is to promote a financially viable and efficient energy sector that provides you with reliable energy services at a reasonable cost. BE INFORMED AND HAVE YOUR SAY You have the right to information regarding this application and to be involved in the process. • You can review Enbridge Gas’s application on the OEB’s website now • You can file a letter with your comments, which will be considered during the hearing • You can become an intervenor. As an intervenor you can ask questions about Enbridge Gas‘s application and make arguments on whether the OEB should approve Enbridge Gas‘s request. Apply by November 5, 2021 or the hearing will go ahead without you and you will not receive any further notice of the proceeding • At the end of the process, you can review the OEB’s decision and its reasons on our website LEARN MORE Our file number for this case is EB-2021-0209. To learn more about this hearing, find instructions on how to file a letter with your comments or become an intervenor, or to access any document related to this case, please enter the file number EB-2021-0209 on the OEB website: www.oeb.ca/participate. You can also phone our Public Information Centre at 1-877-632-2727 with any questions. ORAL VS. WRITTEN HEARINGS There are two types of OEB hearings – oral and written. Enbridge Gas has applied for a written hearing. The OEB will determine at a later date whether to proceed by way of a written or oral hearing. If you think an oral hearing is needed, you can write to the OEB to explain why by November 5, 2021. PRIVACY If you write a letter of comment, your name and the content of your letter will be put on the public record and the OEB website. However, your personal telephone number, home address and email address will be removed. If you are a business, all your information will remain public. If you apply to become an intervenor, all information will be public. This rate hearing will be held under section 36 of the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15 Schedule B. Page 815 Enbridge Gas Inc. P.O. Box 2001 50 Keil Drive N. Chatham, Ontario, N7M 5M1 Canada Richard Wathy Technical Manager Regulatory Applications Regulatory Affairs Cell: 519-365-5376 Email: Richard.Wathy@enbridge.com EGIRegulatoryProceedings@enbridge.com September 29, 2021 VIA RESS AND EMAIL Christine Long Registrar Ontario Energy Board 2300 Yonge Street, 27th Floor Toronto, ON M4P 1E4 Dear Christine Long: Re: Enbridge Gas Inc. (“Enbridge Gas”) Ontario Energy Board (“OEB”) File No.: EB-2021-0209 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing Program Application Enclosed is the application and pre-filed evidence of Enbridge Gas for its 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing Program (the “Application”). Enbridge Gas is filing this Application in connection with the federal Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (the “GGPPA”). A federal carbon pricing program (“FCPP”) under the GGPPA applies to any province or territory that requested it or that did not have an equivalent carbon pricing system in place by January 1, 2019. On October 23, 2018, the federal government of Canada confirmed that the GGPPA applies to Ontario. The FCPP is composed of two elements: (i) a charge on fossil fuels (the “Federal Carbon Charge”) imposed on distributors, importers and producers effective April 1, 2019 and increasing each year on April 1; and (ii) an Output-Based Pricing System (“OBPS”) for prescribed industrial facilities effective January 1, 2019. On September 21, 2020, the province of Ontario announced that the federal government accepted Ontario's carbon pricing system for industrial emitters, known as the Ontario Emissions Performance Standards ("EPS") program, as an alternative to the federal OBPS. On March 29, 2021, the federal government announced that effective January 1, 2022 the EPS will replace the OBPS in Ontario. The GGPPA was amended on September 1, 2021 to remove Ontario from Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the GGPPA, enabling the EPS to take effect in Ontario as of January 1, 2022. Enbridge Gas is seeking OEB approval of just and reasonable rates effective April 1, 2022 for the EGD rate zone and Union rate zones, to recover the costs associated with the GGPPA as a pass-through to customers. Enbridge is also seeking OEB approval to dispose of the 2020 balances recorded in its FCPP-related deferral and variance accounts effective April 1, 2022 and to approve an amendment to the wording of the Page 816 -2 - FCPP-related deferral and variance accounting orders recognizing the change from the federal OBPS to the provincial EPS. Subject to the OEB’s decision, Enbridge Gas intends to reflect 2022 increases to rates for the Federal Carbon Charge and Facility Carbon Charge, and the one-time billing adjustment related to the disposition of 2020 FCPP-related deferral and variance account balances as part of its April 1, 2022 Quarterly Rate Adjustment Mechanism (“QRAM”) application. Additionally, in accordance with the OEB Decision and Order regarding the Deferred Issues in 2019 FCPP Application (EB-2019-0247), Enbridge Gas will remove reference to the interim nature of the Federal Carbon Charge for First Nations on-reserve customers from the rate schedules in its January 1, 2022 QRAM application. Enbridge Gas requests that the OEB issue orders granting the approvals requested on a final basis by February 10, 2022. Should the OEB determine that it is not possible to review and grant the approvals requested by such date, Enbridge Gas requests that the OEB grant approval of just and reasonable rates effective April 1, 2022 on an interim basis by February 10, 2022. Given the significance of Enbridge Gas’s obligations under the GGPPA and considering the magnitude of the associated rate increases, it is appropriate to avoid continued accumulation of unbilled and uncollected amounts from customers that could result in a larger impact on bills when such amounts are recovered in the future. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, (Original Digitally Signed) Richard Wathy Technical Manager, Regulatory Applications c.c.: T. Dyck (Enbridge Gas Counsel) M. Parkes (OEB Staff) L. Murray (OEB Counsel) EB-2020-0212 (2021 FCPP Application Intervenors) Page 817 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 1 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT LIST A – ADMINISTRATION Exhibit Tab Schedule Contents A 1 1 Exhibit List 2 Application 3 Glossary of Acronyms and Defined Terms 2 1 Overview B-FORECASTS Exhibit Tab Schedule Contents B Forecasts – Overview 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 1 Appendix A – Enbridge Gas Estimated PS Compliance Obligation Forecasts - EGD Rate Zone EGD Rate Zone – 2022 Customer Related Volume Forecast by Rate Class (April 2022 to March 2023) EGD Rate Zone – 2022 Facility Related Volume Forecast EGD Rate Zone – 2022 Forecast Compressor Emissions EGD Rate Zone - 2022 Forecast EPS Obligation EGD Rate Zone – 2022 Summary of Customer - Related and Facility-Related Costs Forecasts - Union Rate Zones Union Rate Zones – 2022 Customer-Related Volume Forecast by Rate Class (April 2022 to March 2023) Page 818 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 1 Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT LIST B- FORECASTS Exhibit Tab Schedule Contents B 2 2 Union Rate Zones - 2022 Facility-Related Volume Forecast 3 Union Rate Zones – 2022 Forecast Compressor Emissions 4 Union Rate Zones – 2022 Forecast EPS Obligation 5 Union Rate Zones – 2022 Summary of Customer - Related and Facility-Related Costs C – DEFERRAL AND VARIANCE ACCOUNTS Exhibit Tab Schedule Contents C Deferral and Variance Accounts Attachment 1 – EGD and Union Rate Zone Accounting Orders (Revisions) Attachment 2– EGD and Union Rate Zone Accounting Orders (Clean Version) D - COST RECOVERY Exhibit Tab Schedule Contents D Cost Recovery 1 1 EGD Rate Zone – Derivation of Federal Carbon Charge and Facility Carbon Charge Unit Rates 2 EGD Rate Zone - Bill Impacts 3 EGD Rate Zone – FCPP-Related Deferral and Variance Accounts Balances and Allocation Page 819 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 1 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT LIST D - COST RECOVERY Exhibit Tab Schedule Contents D 1 4 EGD Rate Zone – FCPP-Related Deferral and Variance Account Clearance Unit Rates 5 EGD Rate Zone – FCPP-Related Deferral and Variance Account Clearance Bill Impacts 2 1 Union Rate Zones – Derivation of Federal Carbon Charge and Facility Carbon Charge Unit Rates 2 Union Rate Zones – PDCI Costs Updated to Include Federal Carbon Charge 3 Union Rate Zones – Bill Impacts 4 Union Rate Zones – FCPP-Related Deferral and Variance Account Balances and Allocations 5 Union Rate Zones – FCPP-Related Deferral and Variance Account Clearance Unit Rates and Ex-Franchise Amounts 6 Union Rate Zones – FCPP - Related Deferral and Variance Account Clearance Bill Impacts Page 820 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 1 of 5 ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15, Sch. B; AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by Enbridge Gas Inc., for an order or orders for gas distribution rate changes related to compliance obligations under the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, S.C. 2018, c. 12, s. 186. APPLICATION 1.Enbridge Gas Inc. (“Enbridge Gas”), the Applicant, was formed by the amalgamation of Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. and Union Gas Limited on January 1, 2019 pursuant to the Ontario Business Corporations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. B. 16. Enbridge Gas carries on the business of distributing, transmitting and storing natural gas within Ontario. 2.On June 21, 2018, the Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 1 received Royal Assent. Included in Part V is the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, S.C. 2018, c. 12, s. 186 ("GGPPA"). Under the GGPPA, a federal carbon pricing program ("FCPP") applies in whole or in part to any province or territory that requested it or that did not have an equivalent carbon pricing system in place by January 1, 2019. On October 23, 2018, the federal government confirmed that the GGPPA would apply to Ontario. 3. The FCPP is composed of two elements: (i) a charge on fossil fuels (the “Federal Carbon Charge”) imposed on distributors, importers and producers effective April 1, 2019 and increasing each year on April 1; and (ii) an Output-Based Pricing System (“OBPS”) program for prescribed industrial facilities effective January 1, 2019. 4.The FCPP applies in whole or in part only in provinces or territories that requested it, or that do not have their own, equivalent carbon pricing systems. In provinces or territories with their own carbon pricing systems that have been approved by the federal government, the Federal Carbon Charge and/or the OBPS do not apply. Page 821 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 2 of 5 5. On September 21, 2020, the Province of Ontario announced that the federal government accepted Ontario's carbon pricing system for industrial emitters, known as the Ontario Emissions Performance Standards ("EPS") program, as an alternative to the federal OBPS. On March 29, 2021, the federal government announced that effective January 1, 2022 the EPS will replace the OBPS in Ontario. The GGPPA was amended on September 1, 2021 to remove Ontario from Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the GGPPA, enabling the EPS to take effect in Ontario as of January 1, 2022. Certain details regarding the transition from the OBPS to EPS in Ontario are still being finalized and may impact aspects of this application. In addition, the deadline to submit compliance instruments in respect of 2021 emissions under the OBPS will occur in 2022 after the effective date of the EPS in Ontario. 6. Enbridge Gas’s operations as an integrated natural gas utility in Ontario fall under the purview of the GGPPA and EPS Regulation, which will result in the following costs being incurred: a. Incremental administration and program costs; b. Customer-related Federal Carbon Charge costs for volumes delivered by Enbridge Gas to its residential, commercial and industrial customers who are not covered under the EPS; and c. Facility-related costs (“Facility Carbon Charge”) arising from Enbridge Gas’s facilities and operation of its gas distribution system. 7. Enbridge Gas hereby applies to the OEB, pursuant to the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15, Schedule B (the “Act”), for: a. an order or orders allowing it to charge customers a Federal Carbon Charge on a volumetric basis, in the amount of the Federal Carbon Charge required to be paid by Enbridge Gas pursuant to the GGPPA, effective April 1, 2022; Page 822 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 3 of 5 b. an order or orders approving or fixing just and reasonable rates for all Enbridge Gas rate zones (EGD, Union Northeast, Union Northwest and Union South),1 effective April 1, 2022, to allow Enbridge Gas to recover other costs (including Facility Carbon Charge costs) incurred in compliance with the GGPPA and EPS Regulation; c. an order or orders approving the 2020 balances for all FCPP-related deferral and variance accounts, for all Enbridge Gas rate zones, as set out in Exhibit C and for an order to dispose of those balances as part of the April 1, 2022 QRAM; and d. an order or orders approving an amendment to the wording of the FCPP- related deferral and variance accounting orders recognizing the change from the federal OBPS to the provincial EPS. 8. Enbridge Gas further applies to the OEB for all necessary orders and directions concerning pre-hearing and hearing procedures for the determination of this application. 9. This application is supported by written evidence that has been filed with this application and may be amended from time to time as circumstances may require. 10. The persons affected by this application are the customers resident or located in the municipalities, police villages, Indigenous communities and Métis organizations served by Enbridge Gas, together with those to whom Enbridge Gas sells gas, or on whose behalf Enbridge Gas distributes, transmits or stores gas. It is impractical to set out in this application the names and addresses of such persons because they are too numerous. 1 Collectively, the Union Northeast, Union Northwest and Union South rate zones are referred to as the “Union rate zones”. Page 823 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 4 of 5 11. Enbridge Gas requests that the OEB’s review of this application proceed by way of written hearing in English. 12. Enbridge Gas requests that all documents relating to this application and its supporting evidence, including the responsive comments of any interested party, be served on Enbridge Gas and its counsel as follows: The Applicant: Attention: Richard Wathy Technical Manager, Regulatory Applications Regulatory Affairs Address: Enbridge Gas Inc. P.O. Box 2001 50 Keil Drive North Chatham, Ontario N7M 5M1 Cell: (519) 365-5376 Email: Richard.Wathy@enbridge.com egiregulatoryproceedings@enbridge.com The Applicant’s Counsel: Attention: Tania Persad Senior Legal Counsel Address: Enbridge Gas Inc 500 Consumers Road North York, Ontario M2J 1P8 Telephone: (416) 495-5891 Fax: (416) 495-5994 Email: tania.persad@enbridge.com Page 824 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 5 of 5 -and- Attention: Tyson Dyck Torys LLP Address: 79 Wellington St. W., 30th Floor, Box 270, TD South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5K 1N2 Telephone: (416) 865-8136 Fax: (416) 865-7380 Email: tdyck@torys.com Dated: September 29, 2021 Enbridge Gas Inc. (Original Digitally Signed) ____________________________________ Richard Wathy Technical Manager, Regulatory Applications Regulatory Affairs Page 825 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 3 Page 1 of 7 GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS AND DEFINED TERMS This glossary is intended to serve as a reference for the benefit of readers in their overall understanding of the terminology used in Enbridge Gas’s Application. More detailed definitions may apply to specific terms when used in the context of this Application. 2019 Application – Enbridge Gas’s 2019 Federal Carbon Pricing Program Application and pre-filed evidence (EB-2018-0205). 2020 Application – Enbridge Gas’s 2020 Federal Carbon Pricing Program Application and pre-filed evidence (EB-2019-0247). 2021 Application – Enbridge Gas’s 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing Program Application and pre-filed evidence (EB-2020-0212). BEI – Baseline Emissions Intensity CCCVA – Customer Carbon Charge - Variance Account CEE Plan – Enbridge Inc. Carbon and Energy Efficiency Plan to identify emission reduction opportunities in each of its business units, including Enbridge Gas. CO2 – Carbon dioxide. CO2e – Carbon dioxide equivalent. Company Use – Volumes of natural gas consumed in the operation of Enbridge Gas’s facilities including distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters, and NGV fleet volumes (which are subject to the Federal Carbon Charge under Part 1 of the GGPPA). Page 826 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 3 Page 2 of 7 Covered Facility – An entity registered under the EPS and therefore exempt from the Federal Carbon Charge for volumes of fuel delivered by Enbridge Gas. Covered Facilities are classified as mandatory or voluntary based on annual emissions. Covered Facilities are not exempt from Enbridge Gas’s Facility Carbon Charges or administration-related costs. CRA – Canada Revenue Agency. Credits – Issued by the federal government, under the OBPS, to facilities that achieve annual emissions volumes below their annual output-based emissions limit. Each credit represents one tonne of CO2e, can be banked for future use against emissions or traded, has a useful life of five years from the period following the year for which the credit was issued, and will be tracked using a centralized system. Customer Volumes – Distribution volumes delivered by Enbridge Gas in Ontario, except for volumes delivered to customers that hold an Exemption Certificate. Customer-Related Obligations – The obligations under the GGPPA related to GHG emissions associated with the natural gas delivered by Enbridge Gas, other than to Covered Facilities. DCQ – Daily Contract Quantity. Deferred Issues – As part of its Decision and Order on Enbridge Gas’s 2020 Application, the OEB ordered that for First Nations on-reserve customers the Federal Carbon Charge remain interim and that Enbridge Gas track charges for these customers until such time that the OEB makes a determination regarding the constitutional applicability of FCPP-related charges to them. Page 827 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 3 Page 3 of 7 Distributor – An entity that imports or delivers marketable and non-marketable natural gas, and/or that measures consumption of marketable natural gas and is required to register as a Distributor under the GGPPA.1 DSM – Demand Side Management. ECCC – Environment and Climate Change Canada. EITE – Energy Intensive and Trade Exposed industrial facilities. EPS – Ontario Emissions Performance Standards program; effective January 1, 2022, the EPS will replace the OBPS for Covered Facilities. These facilities will have a compliance obligation based on the portion of its emissions that exceed the annual emissions limit. EPS Regulation – The Greenhouse Gas Emissions Performance Standards filed July 4, 2019 under Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E. 19, as they may be amended from time to time2 EPS Volumes – Volumes of natural gas consumed in the operation of Enbridge Gas’s transmission and storage compressor facilities (which are subject to the EPS as Enbridge Gas’s transmission and storage system is a “covered facility” under the EPS Regulation effective January 1, 2022). EPUs – Issued by the provincial government, under the EPS, to facilities that achieve annual emissions volumes below their annual PS. Each credit represents one tonne of CO2e, can be banked for future use against emissions or traded, has a useful life of five years from the period following the year for which the credit was issued, and will be tracked using a centralized system. 1 The GGPPA, s.55. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/G-11.55.pdf 2 The EPS, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/r19241 Page 828 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 3 Page 4 of 7 Exemption Certificate – A certificate issued by the CRA upon an entity’s registration under the EPS, exempting an entity from the application of the Federal Carbon Charge.3 Facility Carbon Charge – The common volumetric charge proposed by Enbridge Gas, for the EGD rate zone and Union rate zones, to recover the costs resulting from the GGPPA and EPS Regulation related to Enbridge Gas’s: (i) Company Use Volumes including distribution buildings, boiler/line heaters and NGV fleet volumes (which are subject to the Federal Carbon Charge under Part 1 of the GGPPA); and, (ii) transmission and storage compression volumes (which are subject to the EPS as Enbridge Gas’s transmission and storage system is listed as an industrial activity in Schedule 2 of the EPS Regulation). Facility Volumes – Composed of: (i) Company Use Volumes including distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters, and NGV fleet volumes; and, (ii) transmission and storage compression volumes. FCCCVA – Federal Carbon Charge – Customer Variance Account. Amended to CCCVA on January 1, 2022 FCCFVA – Federal Carbon Charge – Facility Variance Account. Amended to FCCVA on January 1, 2022. FCCVA – Facility Carbon Charge – Variance Account FCPP – As part of the GGPPA, a federal carbon pricing program (also known as the “Backstop”) applies in any province or territory that requested it or that does not have an equivalent carbon pricing system in place that meets federal carbon pricing requirements.4 The FCPP is composed of the Federal Carbon Charge and an 3 The GGPPA, s.36. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/G-11.55.pdf 4 Government of Canada – Carbon pollution pricing systems across Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/pricing-pollution-how-it- will-work.html Page 829 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 3 Page 5 of 7 Output-Based Pricing System. Effective January 1, 2022, Ontario is implementing its own carbon pricing system for industrial emitters which will replace the federal OBPS with the Ontario EPS. Federal Carbon Charge – As part of the FCPP, a charge applied to fossil fuels imposed on distributors, importers and producers applicable from 2019-2022 and equivalent to $50/tCO2e as of April 1, 2022. This charge applies to volumes delivered by Enbridge Gas to its customers (other than Covered Facilities) and to Enbridge Gas’s Company Use Volumes (i.e. distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters and NGV fleet volumes). FTE – Full-Time Equivalents. GGEADA – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account. GGPPA – The Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, S.C.2018, c 12, s. 186, as amended from time to time.5 GHG – Greenhouse Gas as set out in Section 3 the GGPPA.6 ktCO2e – Kilo-tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent. Listed Province – A province or territory covered, in whole or in part under the GGPPA.7 Mandatory Participant – Entities that emit 50 ktCO2e or greater annually, where the primary activity engaged in at the facility is listed as an industrial activity under the EPS Regulation, are required to register under the EPS. 5 The GGPPA, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/G-11.55.pdf 6 Ibid, Schedule 3, Greenhouse Gases, Column 1. 7 Ibid, s.3. Page 830 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 3 Page 6 of 7 Marketable Natural Gas – Natural gas that consists of at least 90% methane and that meets the specifications for pipeline transport and sale for general distribution to the public, as defined by the GGPPA.8 MECP – Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks. MUSH – Municipalities, universities, school boards and hospitals. MW – Megawatt. MWh – Megawatt hour. NGV – Natural gas vehicle. Non-Marketable Natural Gas – Natural gas other than marketable natural gas, as defined by the GGPPA.9 OBPS – Output-based pricing system; a component of the FCPP applicable in Ontario from January 1,2019 to December 31,2021 that applies to certain registered facilities instead of the Federal Carbon Charge. A registered entity will have a compliance obligation based on the portion of its emissions that exceed the annual output-based emissions limit. OBPS Regulations – Output-Based Pricing System Regulations published in Canada Gazette II on June 28, 2019, as amended from time to time.10 OBPS VOLUMES – Volumes of natural gas consumed in the operation of Enbridge Gas’s transmission and storage compressor facilities (which are subject to the OBPS as Enbridge Gas’s transmission and storage system is a “covered facility” under Part 2 of the GGPPA, from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021). 8 The GGPPA, s.3. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/G-11.55.pdf 9 Ibid. 10 SOR/2019-266 http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2019/2019-07-10/html/sor-dors266-eng.html Page 831 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 1 Schedule 3 Page 7 of 7 OBS – Output-based standard; a percentage of production-weighted national average emissions intensity applied to annual facility production to determine annual facility emission limits under the OBPS. OEB – The Ontario Energy Board. Offset Credits – Represent GHG emissions reductions or removal enhancements generated from Canadian voluntary project-based activities that are not subject to carbon pricing and that would not have occurred under business as usual conditions.11 PS – Performance Standard; a percentage of the baseline emissions intensity applied to the annual facility production to determine the facility’s total annual emissions limit under the EPS. PDCI – Parkway Delivery Commitment Incentive. QRAM – Quarterly Rate Adjustment Mechanism. RNG – Renewable Natural Gas; also referred to as Biomethane in the GGPPA, means a substance that is derived entirely from biological matter available on a renewable or recurring basis and that is primarily methane. tCO2e – Metric tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent. The unit of measure of GHG emissions. A quantity of GHG, expressed in tonnes, is converted into tCO2e by multiplying the quantity by the applicable global warming potential.12 Voluntary Participant – Entities that emit between 10 ktCO2e and 50 ktCO2e annually, where the primary activity engaged in at the facility is listed as an industrial activity under the EPS Regulation may voluntarily register to be part of the EPS. 11 https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/pricing-pollution-how- it-will-work/output-based-pricing-system.html 12 The GGPPA, Schedule 3, Column 2. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/G-11.55.pdf Page 832 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 1 of 20 OVERVIEW 1. The purpose of this evidence is to further outline the application (“Application”) of Enbridge Gas Inc. (“Enbridge Gas”) for: (i) approval to charge customers a Federal Carbon Charge on a volumetric basis, in the amount of the Federal Carbon Charge required to be paid by Enbridge Gas pursuant to the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (“GGPPA”), effective April 1, 2022; (ii) approval of just and reasonable rates for all Enbridge Gas rate zones, effective April 1, 2022, to allow Enbridge Gas to recover other costs (including the Facility Carbon Charge costs) incurred in compliance with the GGPPA and the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Performance Standards Regulation (“EPS Regulation”); (iii) approval of 2020 balances for all federal carbon pricing program (“FCPP”) related deferral and variance accounts, for all Enbridge Gas rate zones, and disposition of the same, effective April 1, 2022; and (iv) an amendment to the wording of the FCPP-related deferral and variance accounting orders recognizing the change from the federal Output-Based Pricing System (“OBPS”) to the provincial Emissions Performance Standards (“EPS”). 2. Enbridge Gas’s Application is being submitted at this time to facilitate compliance with the GGPPA, the EPS Regulation, and to allow customers to be charged the 2022 Federal Carbon Charge rate for natural gas in a timely fashion without accruing uncharged amounts, in accordance with the FCPP, beginning April 1, 2022. 3. This exhibit of evidence is organized as follows: 1. Background 1.1 The Federal Carbon Pricing Program 2. Enbridge Gas’s Obligations Under the GGPPA and EPS Regulation 2.1 Volumes Subject to Federal Carbon Charge Page 833 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 2 of 20 2.2 Volumes Subject to EPS 2.3 Management of Facility-Related Emissions and Costs 3. Bill Impacts 4. Requested Approvals 1. Background 4. On June 21, 2018, the Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 1 received Royal Assent. Part V included the GGPPA. The FCPP applies in whole or in part to any province or territory that requested it or that did not have an equivalent carbon pricing system in place by January 1, 2019. On October 23, 2018, the federal government confirmed that the GGPPA would apply to Ontario. 5. On November 18, 2019, Enbridge Gas filed its 2020 Federal Carbon Pricing Program application (EB-2019-0247) (“2020 Application”). The OEB supported Enbridge Gas’s proposal to delay seeking OEB approval to dispose of 2020 balances in FCPP-related deferral and variance accounts by one year (to be filed as part of Enbridge Gas’s 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing Program application by September 2021) in order for Enbridge Gas to file final audited year-end 2020 balances in these accounts.1 6. As part of its Decision and Order on Enbridge Gas’s 2020 Application, the OEB ordered that for First Nations on-reserve customers the Federal Carbon Charge remain interim and that Enbridge Gas track charges for these customers until such time that the OEB makes a determination regarding the constitutional applicability of FCPP-related charges to them (“Deferred Issues”). Further, in its Decision and Rate Order dealing with Enbridge Gas’s 2020 Application the OEB ordered that Enbridge Gas include in its rate schedules a reference to the interim nature of the Federal Carbon Charge for these customers. The OEB issued its Decision and 1 EB-2019-0247, OEB Decision and Order, August 13, 2020, p. 21. Page 834 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 3 of 20 Order regarding the Deferred Issues on September 23, 2021. The OEB concluded that the FCPP-related charges can be billed and collected on the natural gas bill of Indigenous customers, including First Nations on-reserve customers. The OEB ordered that the FCPP-related rates previously approved on an interim basis for First Nations on-reserve customers are approved on a final basis for these customers.2 In accordance with this Decision and Order, Enbridge Gas will remove the reference to the interim nature of the Federal Carbon Charge for First Nations on-reserve customers from the rate schedules in its January 1, 2022 Quarterly Rate Adjustment Mechanism (“QRAM”) application. 7. On September 21, 2020, the Province of Ontario announced that the federal government accepted Ontario's carbon pricing system for industrial emitters, known as the Ontario EPS program, as an alternative to the federal OBPS. On March 29, 2021, the federal government announced that effective January 1, 2022 the Ontario EPS will replace the federal OBPS. The GGPPA was amended on September 1, 2021 to remove Ontario from Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the GGPPA, enabling the EPS to take effect in Ontario as of January 1, 2022. 8. This evidence also includes cost estimates and volume forecasts for 2022 that are meant to be used for informational purposes only. Customers will be charged the Federal Carbon Charge and Facility Carbon Charge based on actual volumes. Enbridge Gas will seek disposition of any variance to forecast for 2022 as well as FCPP-related 2022 administration costs through a future application to the OEB. 1.1. The Federal Carbon Pricing Program 9. The FCPP is composed of two elements: a. A charge on fossil fuels (the “Federal Carbon Charge”) as a cost per unit of fuel, including natural gas (cubic meters or m3), imposed on distributors, 2 EB-2019-0247, OEB Decision and Order, September 23, 2021, p.31. Page 835 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 4 of 20 importers and producers applicable from 2019 to 2022 under Part 1 of the GGPPA. This charge applies to fuel delivered by Enbridge Gas to its customers and to Enbridge Gas’s own fuel use within its distribution system (i.e. its “Company Use” for distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters and Natural Gas Vehicle (“NGV”) fleet fuel). Exemptions from the Federal Carbon Charge are explained below. The Federal Carbon Charge is equivalent to $50 per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (“tCO2e”) or 9.79 ¢/m3 in 2022 (see Table 1). The Federal Carbon Charge became effective April 1, 2019 and increases each subsequent year on April 1. Table 1 2019 – 2022 Federal Carbon Charge Rates for Marketable Natural Gas3 Year $/tCO2e ¢/m3 2019 $20 3.91 2020 $30 5.87 2021 $40 7.83 2022 $50 9.79 In December 2020, the federal government released its updated climate plan, “A Healthy Environment and A Healthy Economy”, outlining the strategy to reduce greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions.4 Included in this plan was a proposal to increase the Federal Carbon Charge by $15/tCO2e annually starting in 2023, increasing to $170/tCO2e in 2030. The federal government confirmed this Federal Carbon Charge increase in July 2021.5 The rates for 2023 to 2030 are shown in Table 2 for informational purposes only, as the GGPPA has not yet been amended to reflect the updated rates. 3 The GGPPA, Schedule 2 and Schedule 4. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/G-11.55.pdf 4 https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/eccc/documents/pdf/climate-change/climate- plan/healthy_environment_healthy_economy_plan.pdf 5 https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/pricing-pollution-how-it- will-work/carbon-pollution-pricing-federal-benchmark-information.html Page 836 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 5 of 20 Table 2 2023 – 2030 Federal Carbon Charge Rate Year $/tCO2e 2023 $65 2024 $80 2025 $95 2026 $110 2027 $125 2028 $140 2029 $155 2030 $170 b. Entities that are covered under Part 2 of the GGPPA, “Industrial Greenhouse Gas Emissions”, are exempt from coverage under Part 1 of the GGPPA, “Fuel Charge”. Part 2 entities are instead covered under an OBPS, with mandatory and voluntary participation thresholds, established for prescribed industrial facilities that emit specified volumes of GHG emissions, measured in tCO2e, annually.6 This component of the GGPPA became effective January 1, 2019. The OBPS creates a pricing incentive to reduce GHG emissions from Energy Intensive and Trade Exposed (“EITE”) industrial facilities while limiting the impacts of carbon pricing on their respective competitiveness. Entities subject to the OBPS are required to apply to Environment and Climate Change Canada (“ECCC”), and the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) for exemption from the Federal Carbon Charge. The exemption certificate issued by the CRA must then be submitted to Enbridge Gas to ensure that the entity is not charged the Federal Carbon Charge on its natural gas bill. 6 Under the OBPS, the mandatory emissions threshold for entities identified as being in an Energy Intensive and Trade Exposed sector has been established as 50 ktCO2e or more per year by Environment and Climate Change Canada. Voluntary participants may opt-in to the OBPS if the entity emits between 10 - 50 ktCO2e per year. In both cases, facilities must carry out an activity for which an Output-Based Standard is prescribed to be eligible. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate- change/services/climate-change/pricing-pollution-how-it-will-work/output-based-pricing-system.html Page 837 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 6 of 20 Participants in the OBPS are required to report and manage their own compliance obligations and have the following options to satisfy annual emissions that exceed their sector-based emission intensity benchmark:7 (i) pay the excess emissions charge;8 (ii) submit surplus credits issued by the federal government (“Credits”); (iii) submit eligible offset credits (“Offset Credits”);9 or (iv) submit eligible Recognized Units.10 10. The FCPP applies in whole or in part only in provinces or territories that requested it, or that do not have their own carbon pricing systems. In provinces or territories with their own carbon pricing systems that have been approved by the federal government, Part 1 and/or Part 2 of the GGPPA do not apply. 11. Effective January 1, 2022, Ontario is implementing its own carbon pricing system for industrial emitters, called the Ontario EPS program, and will no longer be covered under Part 2 of the GGPPA.11 The following announcements and changes to legislation have been made regarding the transition to EPS: 7 Output Based Standards are included for each industrial activity in Schedule 1 of the Output Based Pricing System Regulations https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2019-266/page- 15.html#h-1185036 8 Excess emissions charge is the carbon price in $/tCO2e as outlined in Table 1. Rates of charge applicable from 2019-2022 are outlined in Schedule 4 of the GGPPA. 9 Offset Credits represent greenhouse gas emissions reductions or removal enhancements generated from Canadian voluntary project-based activities that are not subject to carbon pricing and that would not have occurred under business as usual conditions (i.e. the reductions go beyond legal requirements and standard practice). Details of the proposed federal offset credit program were made available in June 2019 through a discussion paper entitled Carbon Pollution Pricing: Options for a Federal GHG Offset System (https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/pricing- pollution-how-it-will-work/federal-offset-system.html) and in July 2020 through a discussion paper entitled Carbon Pollution Pricing: Considerations for Protocol Development in the Federal GHG Offset System (https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/pricing- pollution-how-it-will-work/output-based-pricing-system/carbon-pollution-pricing-considerations-protocol- development.html). The federal GHG offset regulation is anticipated to be published in the Fall of 2021. 10 Offset credits generated by federally approved provincial offset protocols. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/pricing-pollution-how- it-will-work/output-based-pricing-system/list-recognized-offset-programs-protocols.html 11 https://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2021/2021-09-01/html/sor-dors195-eng.html Page 838 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 7 of 20 (i) On September 21, 2020, the province of Ontario announced that the federal government accepted the Ontario EPS program as an alternative to the OBPS. (ii) On December 23, 2020, the federal government issued a Notice of Intent to amend the OBPS Regulations to reflect the removal of Ontario as a listed province under Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the GGPPA to facilitate the implementation of Ontario’s EPS program as an alternative to the OBPS. (iii) On March 29, 2021, the federal government announced that the federal OBPS will stand down in Ontario at the end of 2021 and Ontario will transition to the EPS effective January 1, 2022. (iv) On September 1, 2021, the Order Amending Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act was published in the Canada Gazette, Part II, which removes Ontario from Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the GGPPA as of January 1, 2022. 12. Similar to the OBPS, the EPS creates a pricing incentive to reduce GHG emissions from EITE industrial facilities while limiting the impacts of carbon pricing on their respective competitiveness. Under the EPS Regulations, the Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (“MECP”) established a mandatory emissions threshold for entities identified as being in an EITE sector (facilities which have a primary activity listed in Schedule 2 of the EPS Regulation) of 50 ktCO2e or more per year and a voluntary emissions threshold of 10 – 50 ktCO2e per year for those entities that choose to voluntarily participate in the EPS. 13. Entities that are covered under the EPS are exempt from coverage under Part 1 of the GGPPA. Entities included in the EPS will be required to apply to the MECP, and the CRA for exemption from the Federal Carbon Charge. The Exemption Certificate issued by the CRA must then be submitted to Enbridge Gas to ensure that the entity is not charged the Federal Carbon Charge on its natural gas bill. Entities registered under the OBPS that will be transitioning to the EPS effective Page 839 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 8 of 20 January 1, 2022 will be reissued exemption documentation from the CRA. Enbridge Gas will maintain exemptions for customers who have provided the Company with their reissued Exemption Certificate, unless they otherwise notify Enbridge Gas that they are not eligible for exemption in EPS. Enbridge Gas will also exempt any additional eligible customers who submit an Exemption Certificate in the future. Participants in the EPS will be required to report and manage their own compliance obligations and if their annual emissions are greater than the total annual emissions limit, participants will have the following options to satisfy their compliance obligation:12 (i) pay the excess emissions charge;13 or (ii) submit emissions performance units issued by the provincial government (“EPUs”). 14. Enbridge Gas is working to understand the transition plan from the OBPS to the EPS and reserves its right to amend this Application as appropriate once additional details are announced. Certain aspects of this transition have not yet been finalized by the relevant governmental authorities and may ultimately impact the costs incurred by Enbridge Gas in complying with the GGPPA and EPS. Any cost impacts to the Facility Carbon Charge due to a change in the estimated EPS compliance obligation will be included in the Facility Carbon Charge – Variance Accounts for future disposition.14 In addition, the deadline for satisfying a participant’s compliance obligation for 2021 emissions covered by the OBPS will occur in 2022 after the effective date of the Ontario EPS program. 12 MECP: GHG Emissions Performance Standards and Methodology for the Determination of the Total Annual Emissions Limit, July 2019, p.17. https://www.ontariocanada.com/registry/showAttachment.do?postingId=28727&attachmentId=41017 13 Excess emissions charge is the price per unit in $/tCO2e. Rates of charge applicable from 2019-2022 are outlined in Section 11(9) of the EPS Regulations. For the 2022 compliance period, the excess emissions charge is $50/tCO2e. 14 An amendment to the wording of the approved FCPP-related deferral and variance accounting orders has been proposed in this application which may result in new acronyms for the FCPP-related deferral and variance accounts. Please refer to Exhibit C and Exhibit C, Attachment 1 for more information. Page 840 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 9 of 20 15. As a result of the transition from OBPS to EPS and in recognition that Enbridge Gas will be subject to both federal and provincial regulations beginning January 1, 2022, Enbridge Gas requests an update to the accounting orders to reflect this change. Enbridge Gas’s proposed update to the accounting orders can be found at Exhibit C, Attachment 1. 16. Any natural gas volumes delivered by Enbridge Gas for the period of January 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022 will continue to be charged the Federal Carbon Charge and Facility Carbon Charge rates approved by the OEB as part of Enbridge Gas’s 2021 Application. With the transition from the OBPS to the EPS, any variance between what is recovered in rates and Enbridge Gas’s actual compliance obligations will be captured in the OEB-approved variance accounts to be disposed of through a future FCPP application. 17. The only aspect of the FCPP that currently remains under development is the Federal GHG offset system regulations and offset protocols, which are anticipated to be completed fall of 2021. The EPS currently has no provision for use of offsets, although this may change in the future. 2. Enbridge Gas’s Obligations Under the GGPPA and EPS Regulation 18. As a natural gas utility in Ontario, a “listed province” in the GGPPA, Enbridge Gas is required to register under Part 1 of the GGPPA with the CRA as a “distributor” for volumes of natural gas delivered to its customers.15 19. As a “distributor”, Enbridge Gas is required to remit Federal Carbon Charges related to the GGPPA to the Government of Canada. 15 The GGPPA, s.55 (1). The GGPPA requires registration of distributors of marketable or non- marketable natural gas. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/G-11.55.pdf Page 841 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 10 of 20 20. Enbridge Gas is also required to register under the EPS Regulation as a “covered facility” since its transmission and storage operations are covered by an industrial activity listed in Schedule 2 of the EPS Regulation.16 21. As a “covered facility” under the EPS Regulation, Enbridge Gas is required to remit payment for any excess emissions under the EPS. 22. Enbridge Gas has estimated its 2022 cost of compliance with the GGPPA and EPS Regulation to be approximately $1.68 billion: $1,039.50 million for the EGD rate zone (see Exhibit B, Tab 1 for additional detail) and $644.36 million for the Union rate zones (see Exhibit B, Tab 2 for additional detail). In addition, Enbridge Gas estimates that it will incur 2022 administrative costs of approximately $6.99 million associated with the administration of its requirements under the GGPPA and EPS Regulation (see Exhibit C for additional detail). 2.1 Volumes Subject to Federal Carbon Charge 23. Except for customer volumes that are covered under the EPS, or those that are otherwise fully or partially exempt from the Federal Carbon Charge, all distribution volumes delivered by Enbridge Gas in Ontario (“Customer Volumes”) are covered under Part 1 of the GGPPA and are subject to the Federal Carbon Charge.17 24. Under the GGPPA Enbridge Gas is required, on a monthly basis, to:18 calculate and report to the CRA the volume of fuel consumed which is covered under Part 1 of the GGPPA, including Enbridge Gas’s own use 16 The EPS, O.Reg. 241/19. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/r19241 17 To calculate Enbridge Gas’s 2022 customer volume forecast at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 1, and at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 1, Enbridge Gas excluded customers who have provided Enbridge Gas with an exemption certificate, in accordance with Section 17(2) of the GGPPA. This includes downstream distributors, entities covered under the EPS program, and customers who use natural gas in a non- covered activity. RNG volumes and 80% of volumes for eligible greenhouses are also excluded. 18 The GGPPA, s.68 (2b), s.71 (3). https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/G-11.55.pdf Page 842 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 11 of 20 within its distribution system (i.e. distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters and NGV fleet volumes); and remit the amount of the Federal Carbon Charge in respect of the monthly volume that has been calculated. Forecast Customer Volumes and Costs 25. As set out in Table 1, Enbridge Gas is required to remit the 2022 Federal Carbon Charge rate of 9.79 ¢/m3 of natural gas consumed for applicable customers from April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023. As outlined at Exhibit D and consistent with Enbridge Gas’s treatment of 2019, 2020 and 2021 FCPP-related charges, Enbridge Gas will present these charges as a separate line item on customers’ bills. Enbridge Gas’s forecast cost associated with Customer Volumes for the period of April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023 is $1,677.33 million: $1,038.41 million for the EGD rate zone and $638.92 million for the Union rate zones (please see Exhibit B for additional detail on costs associated with Customer Volumes for the period of April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023). 26. These cost estimates are subject to change based on actual distribution volumes and are meant to be used for informational purposes only. Customers will be charged the Federal Carbon Charge rate monthly based on actual billed volumes. 27. Customers that hold an Exemption Certificate must provide a copy to Enbridge Gas no later than two weeks in advance of the first day of the month in which they wish to have their consumption volumes exempted from the Federal Carbon Charge. Similarly, if a customer is no longer eligible to hold an Exemption Certificate, they must provide notice to Enbridge Gas to remove the exemption from the Federal Carbon Charge. Page 843 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 12 of 20 Forecast Company Use Volumes and Costs 28. As set out in Table 1, Enbridge Gas is required to remit the 2022 Federal Carbon Charge rate of 9.79 ¢/m3 for natural gas consumed in the operation of Enbridge Gas’s facilities which are not covered by the EPS (i.e. distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters and NGV fleet volumes) (“Company Use Volumes”). The costs associated with Company Use Volumes will be recovered from customers as part of the Facility Carbon Charge, as detailed at Exhibit D, included in delivery or transportation charges on customers’ bills. Enbridge Gas’s forecast cost associated with Company Use Volumes for the period of April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023 is approximately $2.72 million: $0.58 million for the EGD rate zone and $2.14 million for the Union rate zones (please see Exhibit B for additional detail on costs associated with Company Use Volumes for the period of April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023). 29. The forecast Company Use Volumes and associated Facility Carbon Charge cost estimate are subject to change based on actual Facility Volumes. 2.2 Volumes Subject to EPS 30. Transmitting natural gas is a covered “industrial activity” under the EPS and includes installations and equipment such as compressor stations, storage installations, and compressor units that have a common owner/operator within a province.19 For Enbridge Gas, this includes fuel used in transmission and storage compressor facilities (“EPS Volumes”). 31. Under the EPS, Enbridge Gas is required, on an annual basis, to: calculate and report to the Ontario MECP Enbridge Gas’s covered emissions and total annual emissions limit for each compliance period; and provide compensation for, or otherwise obtain EPUs, to cover any excess emissions by the applicable deadline. 19 The EPS, O.Reg. 241/19. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/r19241 Page 844 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 13 of 20 32. EPS-covered facilities have a compliance obligation for the portion of their emissions that exceed their total annual emissions limit. Under the EPS, a covered facility’s total annual emissions limit is calculated based on the applicable Performance Standard (“PS”) and its associated annual production.20 The PS for facilities transmitting natural gas is 80% of the production-weighted facility baseline emissions intensity.21 The costs associated with EPS Volumes will be recovered from customers as part of the Facility Carbon Charge, as detailed at Exhibit D, included in delivery or transportation charges on customers’ bills. Enbridge Gas’s forecast 2022 (January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022) cost associated with EPS Volumes is $3.81 million: $0.50 million for the EGD rate zone and $3.31 million for the Union rate zones (please see Exhibit B for additional detail on costs associated with EPS Volumes for the period of January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022). 2.3 Management of Facility-Related Emissions and Costs 33. Consistent with Enbridge Gas’s commitment in the 2021 Application “…to identify, track and report on emission reduction opportunities using criteria that effectively balance management of its compliance obligations under the FCPP, estimated capital costs, safety and operational reliability,”22 this section of evidence contains details on the potential options for reducing Enbridge Gas’s facility-related emissions and associated costs.23 Facility-related emissions and associated costs can be reduced through the reduction of either Company Use Volumes or OBPS/EPS Volumes, or, in the case of OBPS/EPS emissions, through the use of lower cost compliance options. 20 MECP: GHG Emissions Performance Standards and Methodology for the Determination of the Total Annual Emissions Limit, July 2019, Section 3. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate- change/services/climate-change/pricing-pollution-how-it-will-work/output-based-pricing-system.html 21 The EPS, O.Reg. 241/19, Table 4.2. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/r19241 22 EB-2020-0212, Enbridge Gas FCPP Application, September 30, 2020, Exhibit A, para. 28, p 14. 23 EB-2019-0247, Enbridge Gas Reply Argument, July 16, 2020, p.13. The OEB subsequently found that Enbridge Gas’s proposal was appropriate; EB-2019-0247, OEB Decision and Order, August 13, 2020, pp. 9-10. Page 845 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 14 of 20 Facility-Related Volume Reductions 34.In 2019, Enbridge Inc. (the parent company of Enbridge Gas) implemented a Carbon and Energy Efficiency Plan (“CEE Plan”) to identify emission reduction opportunities in each of its business units, including at Enbridge Gas. At that time, Enbridge Gas stated that it had not yet identified cost-effective opportunities that would result in significant reductions in emissions related to stationary combustion and flaring.24 35.In November 2020, Enbridge Inc. announced expanded environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) targets related to reducing GHG emissions from operations. This includes achieving net zero emissions by 2050 and a 35% reduction in GHG emission intensity by 2030. 36.In 2021, Enbridge Gas initiated the Facility GHG Emissions Reduction project. The Facility GHG Emissions Reduction project continues the work that Enbridge Gas has completed in previous years as part of the CEE Plan, by identifying and reviewing potential GHG emission reduction opportunities and strategies to support the ESG targets, and evaluating the feasibility, emission reduction potential and cost of opportunities identified. 37.As discussed in Enbridge Gas’ 2021 Application there were four opportunities identified with the potential to reduce OBPS/EPS-volumes.25 Table 3 below shows an overview of the four opportunities identified to date. 24 Cost-effectiveness on a $/tCO2e basis is based on a comparison to the excess emission charge, which is the carbon price in $/tCO2e as outlined in Exhibit A, Table 1. Rates of charge applicable from 2019-2022 are outlined in Schedule 4 of the GGPPA. 25 EB-2020-0212, Enbridge Gas FCPP Application, September 30, 2020, Exhibit A, Table A-2, p. 12. Page 846 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 15 of 20 Table 3 Facility-Related Emission Reduction Project Summary 38. Two of the opportunities, Online Monitoring and Air Filters, have been implemented while the Plant J Twinning and Re-wheeling Turbines will not be moving forward as they are currently not feasible due to their high costs per tonne compared to the excess emissions charge. 26 A Discounted Cash Flow analysis was conducted to calculate the $/tCO2e cost (represented by a positive $/tCO2e figure) or savings (represented by a negative $/tCO2e figure) of CEE plan opportunities. Cash outflows include incremental capital costs of each opportunity. Cash inflows include resulting natural gas savings, avoided carbon charges, any other incremental O&M costs or savings, income tax impacts and any operating costs or savings resulting from the opportunity. The net present value (“NPV”) of cash inflows and outflows is divided by total expected emissions avoided to determine the $/tCO2e. 27 Implementation of online monitoring on applicable units is expected to be completed by the end of 2021. The total 10-yr cumulative emissions reductions of 1,100 tCO2e are expected to be reduced in full once this is complete in 2021. 28 Initial O&M costs for the air filter replacement program are estimated to be $10,000 in 2021 but once the program is fully implemented, it is estimated that there will be an O&M savings of approximately $150,000/year. 29 Although the program was implemented in 2020, due to the condition of existing filters, no upgrades were made in 2020. The implementation of the program will result in the higher efficiency filters will be installed at the next filter change opportunity. 30 Although the forecasted emissions reductions have decreased upon review of this opportunity, the economic analysis was not updated, as this opportunity is moving forward as part of the implementation of a more effective maintenance strategy. 31 This opportunity is currently not being implemented as it is not cost-effective, and therefore no emission reductions will occur in 2022. 32 This opportunity is currently not being implemented as it is not cost effective, and therefore no emission reductions will occur in 2022. Opportunity Total Estimated Capital Cost ($millions) Estimated Emissions Reductions – 2020 (tCO2e) Forecasted Emissions Reductions – 2022 (tCO2e) Forecasted Emissions Reductions – 10-yr Cumulative (tCO2e) Cost per Tonne of GHG Emissions ($/tCO2e)26 1 Online Monitoring 0.05 218 N/A 27 1,100 -32 2 Air Filters 0 28 0 29 184 1,500 -47 30 3 Plant J Twinning (Electric Drive) 70.00 N/A 31 N/A N/A 105 4 Re-wheeling Turbines 17.19 N/A 32 N/A N/A 191 Page 847 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 16 of 20 39. As part of the Facility GHG Emissions Reduction project, Enbridge Gas will continue to identify and review opportunities that reduce stationary combustion emissions (OBPS/EPS emissions) through various pathways, including electrification and RNG fuel switching. In addition to the opportunities identified above, Enbridge Gas is currently developing a plan for compressor unit lifecycle replacement. As part of this long-term plan to replace identified compression, several factors are being considered in the evaluation of alternatives, including meeting the operating requirements for the storage and transmission systems, reliability, environmental compliance, and carbon reduction strategy. There are currently no OBPS/EPS emissions impacts anticipated for 2022, however, emission reduction opportunities and the cost of carbon are being considered in the development of this strategy. As part of this Facility GHG Emissions Reduction project, identified opportunities will be reviewed on an annual basis, including revisiting any previous assumptions, project costs and the cost of carbon. 40. Additional emission reductions are anticipated as part of regular asset management work and equipment life-cycle replacement. For example, Enbridge Gas’s Asset Management Plan includes replacement of heating equipment which is installed to prevent equipment from freezing as well as to prevent or reduce the amount of frost heave experienced at a station. It is expected that the regular upgrade of heaters within the system will result in additional emission reductions of 1,700 tCO2e by 2030, reducing emissions covered under the Federal Carbon Charge. This project has not been listed in the table above because it is considered a maintenance activity with the primary driver for the work being asset condition and has not been included as a project under the CEE Plan. Page 848 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 17 of 20 41. Going forward, Enbridge Gas will continue to identify, track and report on emission reduction opportunities using criteria that effectively balance management of its compliance obligations under the FCPP, estimated capital costs, safety and operational reliability. Enbridge Gas will include details of cost-effective emission reduction opportunities, as appropriate, in future FCPP applications. Actual GHG emission and reductions in OBPS/EPS costs resulting from these opportunities will be reflected in Enbridge Gas’s future FCPP applications for clearance of FCPP- related deferral and variance accounts. OBPS and EPS Compliance Cost Reductions 42. Enbridge Gas has alternative compliance options to satisfy its annual OBPS and EPS compliance obligation aside from paying the excess emissions charge, including the purchase of Credits or EPUs from other OBPS or EPS participants, respectively, and in the OBPS purchasing Offset Credits. 43. For Enbridge Gas to satisfy its 2020 OBPS compliance obligation, paying the excess emissions charge was the only viable option due to several factors including: i) The delayed timing of Credit issuance. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, ECCC announced in April 2020 that the reporting and compensation deadlines for the 2019 compliance period would be delayed. The reporting deadline was moved from June 1, 2020 to October 1, 2020. The regular-rate compensation deadline was moved from December 15, 2020 to April 15, 2021. This delayed the allocation of Credits until the first quarter of 2021. These Credits were then expected to trade on the market at a price slightly below the 2021 excess emissions charge of $40/tCO2e which would have cost more than paying the 2020 excess emissions charge of $30/tCO2e. Page 849 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 18 of 20 ii) The delayed implementation of the federal offset program, which was in development in 2020, and is not anticipated to be finalized until later in 2021 at the earliest. iii) Short timelines to purchase and retire Offset Credits from other provinces, referred to as “Recognized Units”. On August 25, 2020, ECCC announced that facilities with a compliance obligation under OBPS could procure Offset Credits from Alberta. With market prices of Offset Credits in Alberta expected to increase in the fourth quarter of 2020, Enbridge Gas did not have enough time to take the required steps to procure Offset Credits from Alberta below the 2020 excess emissions charge of $30/tCO2e. 44. For Enbridge Gas’s 2022 EPS compliance obligation, the availability and market attributes of EPUs will be reviewed to determine if they present a viable means of reducing compliance costs.33 If Enbridge Gas procures EPUs at a lower price than the excess emissions charge, the difference between these two costs will be recorded in the Facility Carbon Charge –Variance Accounts34 and Enbridge Gas will seek to dispose of those amounts through a future FCPP application.35 45. Additional administrative costs may be incurred, such as increased staffing, and legal and consulting costs, in order to pursue and acquire EPUs and/or Offset Credits. All actual administrative costs incurred will be recorded in the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Accounts and Enbridge Gas will seek to dispose of those amounts through a future FCPP application. 33 Currently, the EPS Regulation does not allow the use of Offset Credits as a viable compliance option. 34 An amendment to the wording of the approved FCPP-related deferral and variance accounting orders has been proposed in this application which may result in new acronyms for the FCPP-related deferral and variance accounts. Please refer to Exhibit C and Exhibit C, Attachment 1 for more information. 35 EB-2019-0247, Exhibit I.STAFF.8 b) and c), June 18, 2020; EB-2019-0247, Enbridge Gas Reply Argument, July 16, 2020, p. 12. Page 850 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 19 of 20 3. Bill Impacts 46. The bill impact of the 2022 carbon charges for a typical residential customer with annual consumption of 2,400 m3 is an increase of $47.05 per year in the EGD rate zone. The bill impact of the 2022 carbon charges for a typical residential customer with annual consumption of 2,200 m3 is an increase of $43.14 per year in the Union rate zones. 47. The bill impact of the proposed 2020 FCPP-related deferral and variance account balance disposition for a typical residential customer with annual consumption of 2,400 m3 is $0.76 in the EGD rate zone. The bill impact of the proposed 2020 FCPP-related deferral and variance account balance disposition for a typical residential customer with annual consumption of 2,200 m3 is $0.27 in the Union South rate zone and $0.34 in the Union North rate zone. 4. Requested Approvals 48. As the costs to comply with the GGPPA and EPS Regulation in 2022 form part of Enbridge Gas’s ongoing operating costs as a utility, and consistent with Enbridge Gas’s 2021 Application, Enbridge Gas proposes to continue to treat all prudently incurred costs of compliance with the GGPPA and EPS Regulation as a pass- through to customers (Y Factor). 49. Through this Application and by February 10, 2022, Enbridge Gas is seeking: a. OEB approval of rates to be applied to customer bills beginning April 1, 2022. Following the issuance of the OEB’s Decision and Order for this Application, Enbridge Gas intends to reflect 2022 rate increases associated with the Federal Carbon Charge and Facility Carbon Charge in its April 1, 2022 QRAM application. b. OEB approval to dispose of the 2020 balances recorded in Enbridge Gas’s FCPP-related deferral and variance accounts effective April 1, 2022. Following the issuance of the OEB’s Decision and Order for this Page 851 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit A Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 20 of 20 Application, Enbridge Gas intends to dispose of these balances as a one- time adjustment in the April 1, 2022 QRAM. c. Approval to amend the wording of the FCPP-related deferral and variance accounting orders to recognize the change from the federal OBPS to the provincial EPS. Page 852 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Page 1 of 5 Plus Appendix FORECASTS - OVERVIEW 1. The purpose of this exhibit of evidence is to provide Enbridge Gas’s forecast of volumes and the associated forecasted costs of complying with the GGPPA and EPS Regulation for each of the EGD rate zone and Union rate zones.1 2. This exhibit of evidence is organized as follows: 1. Tab 1: Forecasts - EGD Rate Zone 2. Tab 2: Forecasts - Union Rate Zones Forecast Period 3. In this Application, Enbridge Gas has forecast volumes and associated costs in alignment with the annual effective date of changes to the Federal Carbon Charge and the EPS: For volumes subject to the Federal Carbon Charge (including customer-related and facility-related volumes) – April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023; and For volumes subject to the EPS (including facility-related volumes) – January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022. 4. Natural gas volumes delivered by Enbridge Gas for the period of January 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022 will continue to be charged the Federal Carbon Charge and Facility Carbon Charge rates approved by the OEB as part of Enbridge Gas’s 2021 Application. 1 Forecast administration costs of complying with the GGPPA and EPS Regulation are detailed at Exhibit C. Page 853 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Page 2 of 5 Plus Appendix Forecast 2022 Volume and Carbon Cost 5. Enbridge Gas’s total 2022 regulated volume forecast subject to the GGPPA and the EPS is 17,328,031 103m3.2 This results in an associated forecast 2022 total cost of $1,683.86 million. The details of this volume forecast, and associated cost are included at Exhibit B, Tab 1 for the EGD rate zone and at Exhibit B, Tab 2 for the Union rate zones. Forecast 2022 Customer Volume and Federal Carbon Charge Cost 6. Enbridge Gas’s total 2022 Customer Volume forecast subject to the Federal Carbon Charge is 17,133,050 103m3 for the period of April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023.3 This results in an associated forecast 2022 Federal Carbon Charge cost of $1,677.33 million. This cost estimate is subject to change based on actual distribution volumes and is meant to be used for informational purposes only. Customers will be charged the Federal Carbon Charge rate monthly based on actual billed volumes. 7. To estimate the Customer Volume forecast, Enbridge Gas excluded customer volumes exempt from Part 1 of the GGPPA, including customer volumes qualifying for exemption for non-covered activities,4 volumes of renewable natural gas (“RNG”),5 and EPS registered customer volumes with emissions exceeding 10 2 Total of regulated customer and facility-related volumes for the EGD rate zone and Union rate zones. Calculated as: Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Col. 3, Line 13 + Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 2, Col. 1, Line 6 + Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 1, Col. 3, Line 16 + Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 2, Col. 1, Line 6. 3 Calculated as: Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Col. 3, Line 13 + Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 1, Col. 3, Line 16. 4 Under the GGPPA, entities that use natural gas which is not put into a fuel system that produces heat or energy and those entities that use natural gas: (i) as a raw material in an industrial process that produces another fuel, substance, material or thing; or (ii) as a solvent or diluent in the production or transport of crude bitumen or another substance, material or thing, meet the definition of a non-covered activity and may be exempt from Part 1 of the GGPPA. 5 Under the GGPPA, biomethane, also known as RNG, is exempt from the Federal Carbon Charge. Page 854 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Page 3 of 5 Plus Appendix ktCO2e.6 Enbridge Gas also excluded volumes delivered to downstream distributors, including those distributors that are out of province, which are also exempt from Part 1 of the GGPPA. Further, Enbridge Gas excluded 80% of the volumes delivered to commercial greenhouse operators.7 8. For forecasting purposes, customers currently in the OBPS who are exempt from Part 1 of the GGPPA and who have provided Enbridge Gas their Exemption Certificate, which is issued to the customer upon registration with the CRA, are assumed to continue to be exempted under the EPS. Customers registered under the OBPS will be reissued exemption documentation from the CRA as part of the transition to EPS. Enbridge Gas will maintain exemptions for customers who have provided the Company with their reissued exemption documentation, unless they otherwise notify Enbridge Gas that they are not eligible for exemption in EPS. Enbridge Gas will also exempt any additional eligible customers who submit an Exemption Certificate in the future. For those customers covered under the EPS or undertaking non-covered activities, Enbridge Gas will exempt the customer on the date provided by the CRA on the customer’s CRA-issued registration confirmation letter. For customers operating commercial greenhouses, exemption will begin the first day of the calendar month following the month in which they provide Enbridge Gas with their Exemption Certificate. 9. The Exemption Certificate indicates that a customer is fully or partially exempt from paying the Federal Carbon Charge on their natural gas combustion fuel delivered by Enbridge Gas. Enbridge Gas uses a customer declaration form to identify which of a customer’s accounts are exempt from the Federal Carbon Charge. Enbridge 6 The 2022 Customer Volume forecast excludes customer volumes from mandatory and voluntary participants of the EPS, that are exempt from the Federal Carbon Charge under Part 1 of the GGPPA. 7 Under the GGPPA, greenhouse operators receive partial relief of 80% of the Federal Carbon Charge for natural gas used in the operation of a commercial greenhouse. Page 855 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Page 4 of 5 Plus Appendix Gas also requests, and maintains on file, copies of each customer’s CRA-issued Exemption Certificate and registration confirmation letter. 10. Enbridge Gas exempts customers from the Federal Carbon Charge in its billing systems based on the accounts listed on the customer declaration form, provided a CRA-issued Exemption Certificate and registration confirmation letter has been provided.8 Customers who are no longer eligible for an exemption from Part 1 of the GGPPA are required, as stated on Enbridge Gas’s declaration form, to notify Enbridge Gas of any changes to the information that they had initially provided. Upon receipt of such notification, Enbridge Gas will process the change within its billing systems effective at either the start of the next calendar month, or the next compliance period, whichever is applicable. 11. Under Part 1 of the GGPPA, biomethane, also known as RNG, is not subject to the Federal Carbon Charge. This includes volumes of RNG nominated by direct purchase customers and RNG procured as part of OptUp, Enbridge Gas’s voluntary RNG program. 12. Enbridge Gas uses a RNG declaration form to have customers declare their RNG usage and identify which customer accounts are eligible to receive exemption from the Federal Carbon Charge. For forecasting purposes, customers who have nominated their own RNG supply in 2021 were assumed to continue in 2022. 13. Volumes of RNG in OptUp were incorporated into the 2022 Customer-Related Volume forecasts based on the forecast provided in Exhibit C, Tab 2, Schedule 3 of the Voluntary Renewable Natural Gas Program Application (EB-2020-0066). 8 Registration confirmation letters are not applicable to commercial greenhouse customers. Page 856 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Page 5 of 5 Plus Appendix Forecast 2022 Facility Volume and Facility Carbon Charge Cost 14. Enbridge Gas’s total 2022 regulated Facility Volume forecast is 194,981 103m3.9 This results in an associated forecast 2022 Facility Carbon Charge cost of $6.53 million. Facility Volumes are based on the amount of natural gas required for Enbridge Gas to operate its facilities as well as the emissions resulting from the distribution of natural gas. Facility Volumes are composed of: (i) Company Use Volumes including distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters, and NGV fleet volumes (which are subject to the Federal Carbon Charge under Part 1 of the GGPPA) for the period of April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023; and, (ii) transmission and storage compression volumes (which are subject to the EPS as Enbridge Gas’s transmission and storage system is a “covered facility” under the EPS Regulations) for the period of January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022. The parameters underpinning Enbridge Gas’s estimated EPS Compliance Obligation can be found at Exhibit B, Appendix A. The forecast 2022 Facility Volume and associated Facility Carbon Charge cost estimate are subject to change based on actual Facility Volumes. 9 Calculated as: Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 2, Col. 1, Line 6 + Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 2, Col. 1, Line 6. Page 857 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Appendix A Page 1 of 2 ENBRIDGE GAS ESTIMATED EPS COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION 1. On July 4, 2019, the Ontario provincial government filed the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Performance Standards Regulation (“EPS Regulation”) as an alternative to the federal OBPS program.1 Enbridge Gas’s storage and transmissions system is considered a “covered facility” under the EPS Regulation. On September 1, 2021 the Order Amending Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act was published in the Canada Gazette, Part II, which removes Ontario from Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the GGPPA as of January 1, 2022.2 Based on the EPS Regulations, the annual compliance obligation under EPS is calculated as follows: Compliance Obligation (tCO2e) = Annual Facility Emissions – Total Annual Emissions Limit Where: Annual Facility Emissions (tCO2e) = Annual EPS Emissions 3 Total Annual Emissions Limit (tCO2e) = BEI (tCO2e/production units) × SF (%) × Annual Production (production units) 2. For forecasting purposes, the total annual emissions limit was based on a facility Baseline Emissions Intensity (“BEI”) calculated by Enbridge Gas, which utilized the emissions and production information provided by Enbridge Gas to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (“MECP”) in April 2019 along with the 2022 stringency factor (“SF”) and the facility specific Performance Standard calculation 1 Ontario Regulation 241/19. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/r19241#BK29 2 https://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2021/2021-09-01/html/sor-dors195-eng.html 3 Ontario Regulation 390/18,s. 12(1). https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/180390 Page 858 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Appendix A Page 2 of 2 methodology, as outlined in the MECP’s GHG Emissions Performance Standards and Methodology for the Determination of the Total Annual Emissions Limit, Formula 3.1.5-3.4 The actual BEI value determined by the MECP and provided to Enbridge Gas once Ontario is no longer subject to the OBPS may differ from the one calculated by Enbridge Gas to develop the forecasted compliance obligation. 3. Forecast annual production is forecast compressor energy use based on the following formula: Energy (MWh)5 = Rated Compressor Brake Power (MW) × Load (%) × Operating Hours (h) Where: Load (%) = The % load of the engine -or- Calculated by Average Annual Speed (RPM) ÷ Max Rated Speed (RPM) 4. To forecast the annual production value for 2022, Enbridge Gas has calculated the compressor energy use in MWh for 2018 to 2020 and used an average of this data. Enbridge Gas’s detailed calculations of the 2022 forecast EPS emissions, total annual emissions limit, EPS compliance obligation and EPS facility carbon cost for each of the EGD rate zone and Union rate zones can be found at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedules 3 to 5 and at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedules 3 to 5. 4 MECP: GHG Emissions Performance Standards and Methodology for the Determination of the Total Annual Emissions Limit, July 2019, p. 17. https://www.ontariocanada.com/registry/showAttachment.do?postingId=28727&attachmentId=41017 5 Amount of work required by a compressor to transport gas. Page 859 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 1 Page 1 of 3 FORECASTS - EGD RATE ZONE 1. The purpose of this tab of evidence is to provide Enbridge Gas’s 2022 forecast of volumes and the associated forecasted costs of complying with the GGPPA and the EPS Regulation, for the EGD rate zone. 2. This tab of evidence is organized as follows: 1. Forecast 2022 Volume and Carbon Cost 2. Forecast 2022 Customer Volumes and Federal Carbon Charge Cost 3. Forecast 2022 Facility Volumes and Facility Carbon Charge Cost 3.1. Company Use Volumes 3.2. EPS Volumes 1. Forecast 2022 Volume and Carbon Cost 3. The EGD rate zone 2022 regulated volume forecast subject to the GGPPA and EPS Regulation is 10,628,929 103m3.1 This results in an associated forecast 2022 total cost of $1,039.50 million. The details of this volume forecast and associated cost are included at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedules 1 to 5. The forecast employs the same methodologies which underpinned forecasts previously approved by the OEB. Enbridge Gas has excluded unregulated non-utility storage volumes and associated costs. Non-utility costs are those associated with Enbridge Gas’s unregulated non-utility storage business. 2. Forecast 2022 Customer Volumes and Federal Carbon Charge Cost 4. The EGD rate zone total 2022 Customer Volume forecast subject to the Federal Carbon Charge is 10,606,849 103m3 as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 1. This results in an associated forecast 2022 Federal Carbon Charge cost of 1 Calculated as: Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Col. 3, Line 13 + Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 2, Col. 1, Line 6. Page 860 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 1 Page 2 of 3 $1,038.41 million as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 5. Enbridge Gas has included forecast distribution volumes subject to the Federal Carbon Charge for all rate classes within the EGD rate zone as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 1. The cost estimates are subject to change and are meant to be used for informational purposes only. Customers will be charged the Federal Carbon Charge monthly based on actual billed volumes. 3. Forecast 2022 Facility Volumes and Facility Carbon Charge Cost 5. The EGD rate zone 2022 regulated Facility Volume forecast is 22,080 103m3 as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 2. This results in an associated forecast 2022 Facility Carbon Charge cost of $1.09 million as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 5. Facility Volumes are composed of: (i) Company Use Volumes including distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters, and NGV fleet volumes (which are subject to the Federal Carbon Charge under Part 1 of the GGPPA); and (ii) EPS Volumes which includes compressor fuel (which is subject to the EPS as Enbridge Gas’s storage and transmission system is a “covered facility” under the EPS Regulation). The forecast 2022 regulated Facility Volume and associated forecast Facility Carbon Charge cost estimate are based on the best available information at this time and are subject to change based on actual Facility Volumes. 3.1 Company Use Volumes 6. The regulated Company Use Volume forecast for 2022 including distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters and NGV fleet volumes for the EGD rate zone is 5,946 103m3 as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 2. This results in an associated forecast 2022 Facility Carbon Charge cost of $0.58 million as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 5. Page 861 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 1 Page 3 of 3 3.2 EPS Volumes 7. The EPS Volume forecast for 2022 for the EGD rate zone is 18,114 103m3 as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 2.2 The subsequent forecast 2022 EPS obligation of 11,304 tCO2e results in a Facility Carbon Charge cost of $0.57 million as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedules 4 and 5. Of the $0.57 million, $0.50 million is attributable to Enbridge Gas’s regulated operations in the EGD rate zone. 8. The EPS Volume forecast is derived by combining forecasts for regulated utility and unregulated non-utility compression activity into an overall physical activity forecast. Enbridge Gas has excluded unregulated non-utility compression volumes and associated costs in deriving the Facility Carbon Charge cost to be recovered in regulated rates. The EPS Volume forecast for the EGD rate zone includes storage compression and dehydration fuel. 9. Enbridge Gas’s detailed calculations of the 2022 forecast compressor emissions, total annual emissions limit, EPS compliance obligation and compressor fuel use cost for the EGD rate zone can be found at Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedules 3 to 5. 2 This includes both utility (regulated) and non-utility (unregulated) volumes. Page 862 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 (Col. 1 - Col. 2) Line No.Rate Class Forecast Volumes1 EPS Participant & Other Exempt Volumes2 Net Volumes 1 1 5,117,476 774 5,116,702 2 6 4,751,842 132,463 4,619,379 3 9 - - - 4 100 31,239 - 31,239 5 110 1,088,282 367,201 721,081 6 115 363,479 359,267 4,212 7 1253 558,826 558,826 - 8 135 55,554 - 55,554 9 145 17,407 4,218 13,189 10 170 243,158 197,665 45,493 11 2004 188,317 188,317 - 12 300 - - - 13 Total Customer-Related 12,415,581 1,808,731 10,606,849 Notes: (1) Forecast Volumes after DSM from April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023. (2) Estimated forecast volumes for mandatory and voluntary participants in the Emissions Performance Standards (EPS), volumes qualifying for exemption for non-covered activities, partial relief (80%) for greenhouse operators and Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) volumes. RNG volumes include the year 2 volumes outlined in the Voluntary RNG Program Application (EB-2020-0066) and have been allocated equally between the EGD and Union rate zones for forecasting purposes. (3) Dedicated unbundled customers. (4) Includes volumes delivered to downstream distributors and landfill gas. Enbridge Gas Inc. EGD Rate Zone 2022 Customer-Related Volumes by Rate Class (April 2022 to March 2023) (103m3) Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 1 Schedule 1 Page 1 of 1 Page 863 Col. 1 Col. 2 Line No.Particulars Utility Forecast Amount (regulated) Non-Utility Forecast Amount (unregulated) Col.3 (Col. 1 + Col.2) Total 2022 Forecast 1 Company Use - Buildings 1,412 - 1,412 2 Company Use - Boilers/Line Heaters 3,692 - 3,692 3 Company Use - NGV Fleet 841 - 841 4 Total Company Use1 5,946 - 5,946 5 Compressor Fuel2 16,134 1,980 18,114 6 Total Facility-Related 22,080 1,980 24,060 Notes: (1) Forecast Company-Use volumes for April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023. (2) Forecast Compressor Fuel for January 1 to December 31, 2022. Enbridge Gas Inc. EGD Rate Zone 2022 Facility-Related Volumes (103m 3) Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 1 of 1 Page 864 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Line No. Particulars Volumes 1 CO2 Emissions2 CH4 Emissions3 N2O Emissions4 CO2e Emissions5 (103m3)(Tonnes CO2) (Tonnes CH4) (Tonnes N2O) (Tonnes CO2e) 1 18,114 35,293 35 1 36,445 Notes: (1) Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 2, Col. 3, Line 5. (2) Environment and Climate Change Canada "Canada's Greenhouse Gas Quantification Requirements - December 2020", Equation 2-9. (3) Col. 1 x Table 2, Col. 2, Line 1 x Table 2, Col. 2, Line 2. (4) Col. 1 x Table 2, Col. 3, Line 1 x Table 2, Col. 3, Line 2. (5) Col. 2 + (Col. 3 x Table 3, Col. 1, Line 1) + (Col. 4 x Table 3, Col. 2, Line 1). Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Line No. Particulars Units CO2 Emission Factor CH4 Emission Factor1 N2O Emission Factor1 1 Natural Gas Pipelines Tonne/GJ 0.00005 0.0000013 2 Heat Value2 GJ/103m3 38.85 38.85 38.85 Notes: (1) Environment and Climate Change Canada "Canada's Greenhouse Gas Quantification Requirements - December 2020", Table 2-4. (2) Assumed Budget Heat Value = 38.85 GJ/10 3m3. In calculating actual emissions, actual heating value will be used. Col. 1 Col. 2 Line No. Particulars Units Methane1 Nitrous Oxide1 1 Global Warming Potential for Carbon Dioxide Tonnes CO2e 25 298 Equivalent Notes: (1) Ontario Regulation 180/18: Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Quantification, Reporting and Verification, Schedule 1. Emission Factors Table 3 Conversion Factors Enbridge Gas Inc. EGD Rate Zone Table 1 2022 Forecast Compressor Emissions Compressor Fuel & Transmission Ancillary Fuel Table 2 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 1 Schedule 3 Page 1 of 1 Page 865 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Line No. 2022 Forecast Compressor Emissions1 2018 - 2020 EGI Average Emission Intensity 2022 Forecast Production2 Facility Specific Performance Standard3 Total Annual Emissions Limit4 EPS Compliance Obligation5 (tCO2e) (tCO2e/MWh)(MWh)(tCO2e/MWh) (tCO2e) (tCO2e) 1 36,445 0.67 54,174 0.46 25,141 11,304 Notes: (1) Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 3, Table 1, Col. 5. (2) Col. 1 / Col. 2. (3) Calculated based on MECP’s GHG Emissions Performance Standards and Methodology for the Determination of the Total Annual Emissions Limit – July 2019, Formula 3.1.5-3. The actual value may differ based on the BEI determined by the MECP and provided to Enbridge Gas once Ontario is no longer subject to the OBPS. The BEI was cacluated by Enbridge Gas in order to develop the forecasted compliance obligation. (4) Col. 3 x Col. 4. (5) Col. 1 - Col. 5. Enbridge Gas Inc. EGD Rate Zone 2022 Forecast EPS Obligation Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 1 Schedule 4 Page 1 of 1 Page 866 Line No.Particulars 2022 Forecast Customer-Related Cost Forecast 1 Customer-related Forecast Volume (103m3) (1)10,606,849 2 Federal Carbon Charge ($/m3) (2)0.0979 3 Total Customer-Related Costs ($)1,038,410,558 Facility-Related Cost Forecast 4 Company-Use Forecast Volume (103m3) (3)5,946 5 Federal Carbon Charge ($/m3) (2)0.0979 6 Company Use Costs ($)582,086 7 EPS Obligation (tCO2e) (4)11,304 8 Excess Emissions Charge ($/tCO2e) (5)50.00 9 Compressor Fuel Use Costs ($)565,221 10 Compressor Fuel Use Costs - Unregulated ($) (6)(61,787) 11 Compressor Fuel Use Costs - Regulated ($)503,434 12 Total Facility Related Costs ($)1,085,520 13 Total Cost Forecast ($)1,039,496,078 Notes: Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 1. Forecast volumes from April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023. Exhibit A, Table 1. Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 2, Column 1, Line 4. Forecast volumes from April 1, 2022 to to March 31, 2023. Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 4. Forecast from January 1 to December 31, 2022. EPS Regulations, Ontario Regulation 241/19: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Performance Standards, Section 11 (9). Unregulated EPS costs are allocated based on pro-rata regulated/unregulated total compressor volumes per Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 2. Enbridge Gas Inc. EGD Rate Zone 2022 Summary of Customer-Related and Facility-Related Costs Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 1 Schedule 5 Page 1 of 1 Page 867 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 2 Page 1 of 3 FORECASTS - UNION RATE ZONES 1. The purpose of this tab of evidence is to provide Enbridge Gas’s 2022 forecast of volumes and the associated forecasted costs of complying with the GGPPA and the EPS Regulation, for the Union rate zones. 2. This tab of evidence is organized as follows: 1. Forecast 2022 Volume and Carbon Cost 2. Forecast 2022 Customer Volumes and Federal Carbon Charge Cost 3. Forecast 2022 Facility Volumes and Facility Carbon Charge Cost 3.1. Company Use Volumes 3.2. EPS Volumes 1. Forecast 2022 Volume and Carbon Cost 3. The Union rate zones 2022 regulated volume forecast subject to the GGPPA and EPS Regulation is 6,699,102 103m3.1 This results in an associated forecast 2022 total cost of $644.36 million. The details of this volume forecast and associated cost are included at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedules 1 to 5. The forecast employs the same methodologies which underpinned forecasts previously approved by the OEB. Enbridge Gas has excluded unregulated non-utility storage volumes and associated costs. Non-utility costs are those associated with Enbridge Gas’s unregulated non- utility storage business. 2. Forecast 2022 Customer Volumes and Federal Carbon Charge Cost 4. The Union rate zones total 2022 Customer Volume forecast subject to the Federal Carbon Charge is 6,526,201 103m3 as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 1. This 1 Calculated as: Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 1, Col. 3, Line 16 + Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 2, Col. 1, Line 6. Page 868 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 2 Page 2 of 3 results in an associated forecast 2022 Federal Carbon Charge cost of $638.92 million as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 5. Enbridge Gas has included forecast distribution volumes subject to the Federal Carbon Charge for all rate classes within the Union rate zones as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 1. The cost estimates are subject to change and are meant to be used for informational purposes only. Customers will be charged the Federal Carbon Charge monthly based on actual billed volumes. 3. Forecast 2022 Facility Volumes and Facility Carbon Charge Cost 5. The Union rate zones total 2022 regulated Facility Volume forecast is 172,901 103m3 as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 2. This results in an associated forecast 2022 Facility Carbon Charge cost of $5.44 million as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 5. Facility Volumes are composed of: (i) Company Use Volumes including distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters, and NGV fleet volumes (which are subject to the Federal Carbon Charge under Part 1 of the GGPPA); and (ii) EPS Volumes which includes compressor fuel (which is subject to the EPS as Enbridge Gas’s storage and transmission system is a “covered facility” under the EPS Regulation). The forecast 2022 regulated Facility Volume and associated forecast Facility Carbon Charge cost estimate are based on the best available information at this time and are subject to change based on actual Facility Volumes. 3.1 Company Use Volumes 6. The regulated Company Use Volume forecast for 2022 including distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters and NGV fleet volumes for the Union rate zones is 21,835 103m3 as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 2.2 This results in an 2 Enbridge Gas’s buildings and boiler/line heater fuel volume forecast for the Union rate zones is based on a three-year average of consumption by location. For new buildings with no historical information, a volume estimate is used. Page 869 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 2 Page 3 of 3 associated forecast 2022 Facility Carbon Charge cost of $2.14 million as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 5.3 3.2 EPS Volumes 7. The EPS Volume forecast for 2022 for the Union rate zones is 166,183 103m3 as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 2.4 The subsequent forecast 2022 EPS obligation of 72,741 tCO2e results in a Facility Carbon Charge cost of $3.64 million as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedules 4 and 5. Of the $3.64 million, $3.31 million is attributable to Enbridge Gas’s regulated operations in the Union rate zones. 8. The EPS Volume forecast is derived by combining forecasts for regulated utility and unregulated non-utility compression activity into an overall physical activity forecast. Enbridge Gas has excluded unregulated non-utility compression volumes and associated costs in deriving the Facility Carbon Charge cost to be recovered in regulated rates. The EPS Volume forecast for the Union rate zones includes transmission compression, storage compression and dehydration fuel.5 9. Enbridge Gas’s detailed calculations of the 2022 forecast compressor emissions, total annual emissions limit, EPS compliance obligation and compressor fuel use cost for the Union rate zones can be found at Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 3 to 5. 3 Included in the Company Use Volume forecast for 2022 is 18 103m3 for distribution buildings associated with non-utility unregulated storage activity. Enbridge Gas has not accounted for this amount separately as it is immaterial, resulting in costs of less than $2,000. 4 This includes both utility (regulated) and non-utility (unregulated) volumes. 5 The transmission and storage compression forecast is derived by combining forecasts for in-franchise and ex-franchise transmission and storage activity into an overall physical activity forecast. For dehydration fuel, average historical utilization is used to estimate the monthly forecasted usage. Page 870 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 (Col. 1 - Col. 2) Line No. Rate Class Forecast Volumes1 EPS Participant & Other Exempt Volumes2 Net Volumes 1 1 1,027,027 430 1,026,597 2 10 368,229 12,741 355,488 3 M1 3,138,672 2,932 3,135,740 4 M2 1,290,399 85,030 1,205,369 5 20 796,103 666,156 129,947 6 25 91,136 82,109 9,027 7 100 1,036,246 1,036,246 - 8 M4 593,748 230,441 363,307 9 M5 62,137 15,072 47,065 10 M7 685,559 533,307 152,251 11 M93 88,845 88,845 - 12 M103 360 91 269 13 T1 416,900 315,758 101,141 14 T2 4,226,389 4,226,389 - 15 T33 264,209 264,209 - 16 Total Customer-Related 14,085,959 7,559,758 6,526,201 Notes: (1) Forecast Volumes after DSM from April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023. (2) Estimated forecast volumes for mandatory and voluntary participants in the Emissions Performance Standards (EPS), volumes qualifying for exemption for non-covered activities, partial relief (80%) for greenhouse operators and Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) volumes. RNG volumes include the year 2 volumes outlined in the Voluntary RNG Program Application (EB-2020-0066) and have been allocated equally between the EGD and Union rate zones for forecasting purposes. (3) Includes volumes delivered to downstream distributors and landfill gas. Enbridge Gas Inc. Union Rate Zone 2022 Customer-Related Volumes by Rate Class (April 2022 to March 2023) (103m3) Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 1 of 1 Page 871 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col.3 (Col. 1 + Col.2) Line No.Particulars Utility Forecast Amount (regulated) Non-Utility Forecast Amount (unregulated) Total 2022 Forecast 1 Company Use - Buildings 1,636 18 1,654 2 Company Use - Boilers/Line Heaters 20,199 - 20,199 3 Company Use - NGV Fleet - - - 4 Total Company Use1 21,835 18 21,853 5 Compressor Fuel2 151,067 15,117 166,183 6 Total Facility-Related 172,901 15,135 188,036 Notes: (1) Forecast Company-Use volumes for April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023. (2) Forecast Compressor Fuel for January 1 to December 31, 2022. Enbridge Gas Inc. Union Rate Zone 2022 Facility-Related Volumes (103m3) Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 2 Schedule 2 Page 1 of 1 Page 872 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Line No. Particulars Volumes 1 CO2 Emissions2 CH4 Emissions3 N2O Emissions4 CO2e Emissions5 (103m3)(Tonnes CO2) (Tonnes CH4) (Tonnes N2O) (Tonnes CO2e) 1 166,183 328,516 327 8 339,216 Notes: (1) Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 2, Col. 3, Line 5. (2) Environment and Climate Change Canada "Canada's Greenhouse Gas Quantification Requirements - December 2020", Equation 2-9. (3) Col. 1 x Table 2, Col. 2, Line 1 x Table 2, Col. 2, Line 2. (4) Col. 1 x Table 2, Col. 3, Line 1 x Table 2, Col. 3, Line 2. (5) Col. 2 + (Col. 3 x Table 3, Col. 1, Line 1) + (Col. 4 x Table 3, Col. 2, Line 1). Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Line No. Particulars Units CO2 Emission Factor CH4 Emission Factor1 N2O Emission Factor1 1 Natural Gas Pipelines Tonne/GJ 0.00005 0.0000013 2 Heat Value2 GJ/103m3 39.32 39.32 39.32 Notes: (1) Environment and Climate Change Canada "Canada's Greenhouse Gas Quantification Requirements - December 2020", Table 2-4. (2) Assumed Budget Heat Value = 39.32 GJ/10 3m3. In calculating actual emissions, actual heating value will be used. Col. 1 Col. 2 Line No. Particulars Units Methane1 Nitrous Oxide1 1 Global Warming Potential for Carbon Dioxide Tonnes CO2e 25 298 Equivalent Notes: (1) Ontario Regulation 180/18: Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Quantification, Reporting and Verification, Schedule 1. Conversion Factors Table 2 Table 3 Enbridge Gas Inc. Table 1 Union Rate Zone 2022 Forecast Compressor Emissions Compressor Fuel & Transmission Ancillary Fuel Emission Factors Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 2 Schedule 3 Page 1 of 1 Page 873 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Line No. 2022 Forecast Compressor Emissions1 2018 - 2020 EGI Average Emission Intensity 2022 Forecast Production2 Facility Specific Performance Standard3 Total Annual Emissions Limit4 EPS Compliance Obligation5 (tCO2e) (tCO2e/MWh)(MWh)(tCO2e/MWh) (tCO2e) (tCO2e) 1 339,216 0.59 574,206 0.46 266,475 72,741 Notes: (1) Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 3, Table 1, Col. 5. (2) Col. 1 / Col. 2. (3) Calculated based on MECP’s GHG Emissions Performance Standards and Methodology for the Determination of the Total Annual Emissions Limit – July 2019, Formula 3.1.5-3. The actual value may differ based on the BEI determined by the MECP and provided to Enbridge Gas once Ontario is no longer subject to the OBPS. The BEI was cacluated by Enbridge Gas in order to develop the forecasted compliance obligation. (4) Col. 3 x Col. 4. (5) Col. 1 - Col. 5. Enbridge Gas Inc. Union Rate Zone 2022 Forecast EPS Obligation Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 2 Schedule 4 Page 1 of 1 Page 874 Line No.Particulars 2022 Forecast Customer-Related Cost Forecast 1 Customer-related Forecast Volume (103m3) (1)6,526,201 2 Federal Carbon Charge ($/m3) (2)0.0979 3 Total Customer-Related Costs ($)638,915,115 Facility-Related Cost Forecast 4 Company-Use Forecast Volume (103m3) (3)21,835 5 Federal Carbon Charge ($/m3) (2)0.0979 6 Company Use Costs ($)2,137,624 7 EPS Obligation (tCO2e) (4)72,741 8 Excess Emissions Charge ($/tCO2e) (5)50.00 9 Compressor Fuel Use Costs ($)3,637,046 10 Compressor Fuel Use Costs - Unregulated ($) (6)(330,839) 11 Compressor Fuel Use Costs - Regulated ($)3,306,207 12 Total Facility Related Costs ($)5,443,831 13 Total Cost Forecast ($)644,358,946 Notes: (1) Exhibit B,Tab 2, Schedule 1. Forecast volumes from April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023. (2) Exhibit A, Table A-1. (3) Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 2, Column 1, Line 4. Forecast volumes from April 1, 2022 to to March 31, 2023. (4) Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 4. Forecast from January 1 to December 31, 2022. (5) EPS Regulations, Ontario Regulation 241/19: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Performance Standards, Section 11 (9). (6) Unregulated EPS costs are allocated based on pro-rata regulated/unregulated total compressor volumes per Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 2. Enbridge Gas Inc. Union Rate Zone 2022 Summary of Customer-Related and Facility-Related Costs Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit B Tab 2 Schedule 5 Page 1 of 1 Page 875 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 1 of 12 Plus Attachments DEFERRAL AND VARIANCE ACCOUNTS 1. The purpose of this exhibit of evidence is to address deferral and variance account matters associated with Enbridge Gas’s Application. As outlined in the Application, Enbridge Gas is seeking disposition of 2020 balances in FCPP-related deferral and variance accounts for each of the EGD rate zone and Union rate zones, and an amendment to the wording of the FCPP-related deferral and variance accounting orders recognizing the change from the federal OBPS to the provincial EPS. Allocation and disposition of 2020 deferral and variance account balances is discussed in detail at Exhibit D. 2. This exhibit of evidence is organized as follows: 1. Established FCPP-Related Deferral and Variance Accounts 2. Accounting Order Amendments 3. 2020 FCPP-Related Deferral and Variance Account Balances 3.1. 2020 Administration Costs Recorded in the GGEADA 3.2. 2020 Customer-Related Costs Recorded in the FCCCVA 3.3. 2020 Facility-Related Costs Recorded in the FCCFVA 4. Forecast 2022 Administration Costs (for informational purposes only) 1. Established FCPP-Related Deferral and Variance Accounts 3. In its 2019 Application, to facilitate compliance with the GGPPA in 2019 and beyond and ensure that the costs of compliance with the GGPPA were clearly delineated from those incurred under the Cap-and-Trade Program, Enbridge Gas requested OEB approval to establish five new deferral and variance accounts. The new accounts would record: (i) actual combined administration costs for all rate zones (effective January 1, 2019); (ii) Federal Carbon Charge cost variances between the actual costs incurred and the amount collected through rates related to the volumes delivered by Enbridge Gas for each of the EGD rate zone and Union rate zones (effective April 1, 2019); and (iii) Facility Carbon Charge cost variances between the actual costs incurred and the amount collected through Page 876 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 2 of 12 Plus Attachments rates related to Company Use and OBPS volumes associated with Enbridge Gas’s own operations for each of the EGD rate zone and the Union rate zones (effective January 1, 2019).1 4.In its Decision and Order on Enbridge Gas’s 2019 Application, the OEB approved the establishment of Enbridge Gas’s requested new FCPP-related deferral and variance accounts with a single exception; rather than approving a single deferral account to record the combined administration costs for all rate zones, the OEB directed that Enbridge Gas should establish two GGEADA, one for each of the EGD rate zone and the Union rate zones.2 5.Accordingly, Enbridge Gas established the following FCPP-related deferral and variance accounts: 1.GGEADA – EGD Rate Zone;3 2.GGEADA – Union Rate Zones;4 3.FCCCVA – EGD Rate Zone;5 4.FCCCVA – Union Rate Zones;6 5.FCCFVA – EGD Rate Zone;7 and 6.FCCFVA – Union Rate Zones.8 1 EB-2018-0205, EGI 2019 FCPP Application, October 10, 2018, Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 1, pp. 2-4. 2 EB-2018-0205, OEB Decision and Order, July 4, 2019, pp. 9-10. 3 EGD Rate Zone Account No. 179-501, to record the administration costs associated with the impacts of federal regulations related to greenhouse gas emission requirements for Enbridge Gas within the EGD rate zone effective January 1, 2019. 4 Union Rate Zones Account No. 179-422, to record the administration costs associated with the impacts of federal regulations related to greenhouse gas emission requirements for Enbridge Gas within the Union rate zones effective January 1, 2019. 5 EGD Rate Zone Account No. 179-502, to record the variances between actual customer carbon costs and customer carbon costs recovered in rates for distribution volumes delivered by Enbridge Gas within the EGD rate zone effective April 1, 2019. Except for exempted customers as explained in Exhibit A. 6 Union Rate Zones Account No. 179-421, to record the variances between actual customer carbon costs and customer carbon costs recovered in rates for distribution volumes delivered by Enbridge Gas within the Union rate zones effective April 1, 2019. Except for exempted customers as explained in Exhibit A. 7 EGD Rate Zone Account No. 179-503, to record the variance between actual facility carbon costs and facility carbon costs recovered in rates within the EGD rate zone effective January 1, 2019. 8 Union Rate Zones Account No. 179-420, to record the variance between actual facility carbon costs and facility carbon costs recovered in rates within the Union rate zones effective January 1, 2019. Page 877 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 3 of 12 Plus Attachments 2.Accounting Order Amendments 6.As a result of the transition from the federal OBPS to the provincial EPS and in recognition that Enbridge Gas will be subject to both federal and provincial regulations beginning January 1, 2022, Enbridge Gas is proposing to update the accounting orders to reflect this change, effective January 1, 2022. 7.Enbridge Gas is requesting to update the applicable account definitions to include reference to both federal and provincial regulations and to update the applicable account names to remove the word “Federal”. Enbridge Gas’s requested update to the accounting orders can be found attached to this exhibit, Exhibit C. Attachment 1 shows the changes to the accounting order in black-line revision marking, and Attachment 2 is a clean version of the proposed changes. 3. 2020 FCPP-Related Deferral and Variance Account Balances 8.Enbridge Gas is seeking to dispose of: 2020 administration costs of $2.54 million in the GGEADAs and 2020 facility-related costs of $(0.80) million in the FCCFVAs. The 2020 FCCCVAs have a zero balance. 3.1 2020 Administration Costs Recorded in the GGEADA 9.As set out in Table 1, Enbridge Gas’s 2020 administration costs are $2.54 million. A description of variances to Enbridge Gas’s forecast 2020 administration costs follows. Page 878 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 4 of 12 Plus Attachments Table 1 2020 Administration Costs ($millions) Cost Element 2020 Forecasted Costs 9 2020 Actual Costs 10 Variance EGD Rate Zone Union Rate Zones Total IT Billing System 0.40 0.17 0.14 0.31 (0.09) Staffing Resources 0.80 0.52 0.32 0.84 0.04 Consulting and External Legal Support 0.20 0.08 0.05 0.13 (0.07) GHG Reporting and Verification 0.10 0.04 0.02 0.06 (0.04) Bad Debt 1.84 0.84 0.29 1.13 (0.71) Other Miscellaneous Costs 0.20 0.02 0.01 0.04 (0.16) Interest11 N/A 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 Total 3.54 1.70 0.85 2.54 (1.00) 10. Shared administration costs set out in Table 1, including costs related to: staffing resources, consulting and external legal support, GHG reporting and verification and other miscellaneous costs, have been allocated to the EGD rate zone and Union rate zones in proportion to actual customers’ consumption volumes subject to the Federal Carbon Charge from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020.12 Unique administration costs set out in Table 1 that are immediately attributable to a particular rate zone, including costs related to IT billing systems and bad debt, have been allocated to that respective rate zone accordingly. Each of the cost categories set out in Table 1 is further discussed below. IT Billing System Costs 11. In its 2020 Application, Enbridge Gas forecast costs of $0.40 million related to the IT billing systems, which included $0.20 million for the EGD rate zone and 9 EB-2019-0247, EGI FCPP Application, May 14, 2020, Updated Exhibit C, Table C-3, p. 14. 10 Composed of actual 2020 costs from January to December 2020. 11 Enbridge Gas did not include a 2020 forecast cost for interest. 12 Approximately 62% of customer consumption volumes were attributable to the EGD rate zone and 38% of customer consumption volumes were attributable to the Union rate zones. Page 879 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 5 of 12 Plus Attachments $0.20 million for the Union rate zones.13 Included in these forecasts was the revenue requirement associated with the Cap and Trade-related billing system functionality, which was re-purposed for GGPPA-related charges. This also included a forecast capital cost of $0.10 million required for additional billing system modifications for the Union rate zones to comply with the GGPPA. 12. The actual revenue requirement impacts for 2020 associated with the re-purposing of the Cap and Trade-related billing system to collect GGPPA-related charges was a deficiency of $0.32 million; partially offset by a $0.01 million sufficiency associated with the first-year revenue requirement for the additional billing system modifications required for the Union rate zones. Staffing Resources 13. In its 2020 Application, Enbridge Gas forecast costs of $0.80 million for salaries and wages in 2020, which included costs for four full time equivalents (“FTEs”) that comprised the Carbon Strategy team.14 14. Actual salaries and wages costs incurred in 2020 were $0.84 million. FTE requirements increased from four to five in May 2020, reflecting resource requirements to facilitate compliance with the GGPPA and the incremental effort required for regulations related to GHG emissions requirements including the federal Offset Regulation and the Clean Fuel Regulation. Consulting and External Legal Support 15. In its 2020 Application, Enbridge Gas forecast consulting and external legal support costs of $0.20 million for 2020.15 Actual consulting and external legal support costs incurred in 2020 were $0.13 million. Consulting and external legal support costs were lower than forecast due to Enbridge Gas leveraging existing 13 EB-2019-0247, EGI FCPP Application, May 14, 2020 Updated Exhibit C, p. 14-15. 14 Ibid, p. 15. 15 EB-2019-0247, EGI FCPP Application, May 14, 2020, Updated Exhibit C, p. 16. Page 880 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 6 of 12 Plus Attachments internal resources and the delay in the issuance of offset regulations and protocols that may have required additional support. GHG Reporting and Verification 16. In its 2020 Application, Enbridge Gas forecast costs of $0.10 million for GHG reporting and verification in 2020.16 Actual GHG reporting and verification costs incurred in 2020 were $0.06 million, including $0.01 million for the pre-verification of Enbridge Gas’s 2019 OBPS report and $0.05 million related to the verification of its 2019 OBPS report by a third-party auditor as required under the OBPS Regulations. Bad Debt 17. In its 2020 Application, Enbridge Gas forecast costs of $1.84 million for bad debt in 2020.17 Actual bad debt costs incurred in 2020 were approximately $1.13 million. 18. The historic methodology used to collect bad debt within the Union rate zones is a contributing factor to the forecast variance. There is a time lag of approximately nine months between billing a customer and the write-off of a corresponding amount as a bad debt. Due to the timing of OEB approval of the 2019 Application, Enbridge Gas did not begin collecting FCPP-related charges from customers until August 1, 2019. As a result of this and the aforementioned nine-month time lag, bad debt for the Union rate zones did not start accumulating until April 1, 2020, therefore reducing the actual 2020 bad debt costs. 19. Consistent with the OEB’s Decision and Order on Enbridge Gas’s 2020 Application, the $1.13 million is exclusive of COVID-19 impacts. Enbridge Gas has recorded bad debt expenses for the FCPP related to the COVID-19 emergency in the COVID-specific sub-account.18 16 EB-2019-0247, EGI FCPP Application, May 14, 2020, Updated Exhibit C, pp.16-17. 17 Ibid, p. 17. 18 EB-2019-0247, OEB Decision and Order, August 13, 2020, p. 11. Page 881 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 7 of 12 Plus Attachments Other Miscellaneous Costs 20. In its 2020 Application, Enbridge Gas forecast 2020 other miscellaneous costs of $0.20 million associated with customer outreach and communications, training, conferences, travel expenses, memberships and subscriptions associated with the GGPPA or other federal GHG or carbon pricing programs.19 Actual other miscellaneous costs incurred in 2020 were $0.04 million. Due to the COVID-19 emergency, costs related to activities such as travel and conferences were limited, therefore reducing actual miscellaneous costs. Enbridge Gas also leveraged existing customer communication pathways, such as QRAM bill inserts, mass emails, webpages, and social media to communicate to customers regarding the FCPP, thus reducing actual 2020 costs related to customer communications. 3.2 2020 Customer-Related Costs Recorded in the FCCCVA 21. Enbridge Gas tracks the difference between the Federal Carbon Charge amount collected through rates and the actual costs incurred in the FCCCVA for each of the EGD rate zone and the Union rate zones. Since Enbridge Gas remits the Federal Carbon Charge to the CRA based on actual billed volumes and the Federal Carbon Charge rate, consistent with the GGPPA, was being collected through rates, there is no FCCCVA balance for either the EGD or Union rate zones. 3.3 2020 Facility-Related Costs Recorded in the FCCFVA 22. As set out in Exhibit A, Enbridge Gas’s facility-related volumes and associated costs are composed of Company Use Volumes (facilities which are not covered under the OBPS) and OBPS Volumes from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Enbridge Gas’s 2020 facility-related obligation was $3.15 million ($0.82 million related to Company Use Volumes and $2.33 million related to OBPS 19 EB-2019-0247, EGI FCPP Application, May 14, 2020, Updated Exhibit C, pp. 17-18. Page 882 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 8 of 12 Plus Attachments Volumes), of which $2.91 million is attributable to Enbridge Gas’s regulated utility operations. 23. Enbridge Gas has recorded a 2020 facility-related variance of $(0.80) million in the FCCFVA, including $(0.04) million for the EGD rate zone and $(0.76) million for the Union rate zones.20 This reflects a variance between the actual and forecast facility-related costs, and a variance in the amount of revenue billed through the Facility Carbon Charge, due to a difference in Customer Volumes realized. Table 2 below shows the variance related to the difference between 2020 forecast regulated facility-related volumes, as filed in Enbridge Gas’s 2020 Application, and actual regulated facility-related volumes for 2020. Table 221 2020 Regulated Facility-Related Volumes/Emissions and Costs 2020 Forecasted Volumes & Emissions 2020 Forecasted Costs ($millions) 2020 Actual Volumes & Emissions 2020 Actual Costs ($millions) Variance ($millions) Company Use 16,967 103m3 0.83 16,496 103m3 0.82 (0.01) OBPS 108,162 tCO2 3.24 69,873 tCO2 2.10 (1.14) Total - 4.07 - 2.91 (1.15) 20 This variance reflects consideration of: (i) applying the Federal Carbon Charge Rate for Marketable Natural Gas of 3.91 ¢/m3 from January 1, 2020 – March 31, 2020 and 5.87 ¢/m3 from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 set out in Exhibit A, Table 1 to actual Company Use Volumes of natural gas consumed in the operation of Enbridge Gas’s facilities from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020; (ii) Enbridge Gas’s 2020 OBPS obligation of $2.10 million related to regulated utility operations for the January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 period; (iii) actual billed amounts for the January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 period; and (iv) interest of approximately $(0.30) million. 21 Only volumes/emissions and associated costs related to regulated utility operations are included. Page 883 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 9 of 12 Plus Attachments 4. Forecast 2022 Administration Costs 24. As set out in Table 3, Enbridge Gas’s forecast 2022 administration costs are $6.99 million: $4.69 million for the EGD rate zone and $2.30 million for the Union rate zones. Enbridge Gas will record actual 2022 costs in the GGEADAs until such time that these costs are incorporated into rates. Enbridge Gas is providing forecast 2022 administration costs for informational purposes only and will seek recovery of its actual 2022 administration costs in a future proceeding. Table 3 Forecast 2022 Administration Costs Cost Element 2022 Forecast Costs ($millions) EGD Rate Zone Union Rate Zones Total IT Billing System 0.00 0.06 0.06 Staffing Resources 0.91 0.56 1.47 Consulting & External Legal Support 0.19 0.11 0.30 GHG Reporting & Verification 0.03 0.02 0.05 Bad Debt 3.47 1.49 4.96 Other Miscellaneous Costs 0.09 0.06 0.15 Total 4.69 2.30 6.99 25. Shared administration costs set out in Table 3, including costs related to: staffing resources, consulting and external legal support, GHG reporting and verification and other miscellaneous costs, have been allocated to the EGD rate zone and Union rate zones in proportion to forecast customer consumption volumes subject to the Federal Carbon Charge from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022.22 Unique administration costs set out in Table 3 that are directly attributable to a particular rate zone, including costs related to: IT billing systems and bad debt, have been allocated to that respective rate zone accordingly. 22 Approximately 62% of forecast customer consumption volumes are attributable to the EGD rate zone and 38% of forecast customer consumption volumes are attributable to the Union rate zones. Page 884 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 10 of 12 Plus Attachments 26. Enbridge Gas’s current OEB-approved 2021 rates and proposed 2022 rates for the EGD rate zone and Union rate zones do not include any FCPP-related administration costs as these costs are considered to be incremental to Enbridge Gas’s traditional operations as a regulated natural gas utility in Ontario. A description of the components of Enbridge Gas’s forecast 2022 administration costs follows. IT Billing System Costs 27. For 2022, Enbridge Gas forecasts the IT billing system costs to be $0.06 million. The revenue requirement of $0.06 million is associated with the additional billing system modifications required in 2020 for the Union rate zones.23 The 2022 revenue requirement for these costs has not been previously collected from customers. Staffing Resources 28. For 2022, staffing costs are currently estimated to be approximately $1.47 million. These fully allocated costs are for the five FTEs that comprise the Carbon Strategy team in 2020 plus one additional half FTE. This level of staffing reflects the incremental level of effort Enbridge Gas has experienced to date and expects to require across the organization to facilitate compliance with the GGPPA and EPS Regulation in 2022, including the incremental effort to evaluate and procure EPUs. With the establishment of other carbon emission-related programs and initiatives in the future, Enbridge Gas may require incremental staffing resources. Enbridge Gas will seek OEB approval to recover actual 2022 staffing costs required to facilitate compliance with the GGPPA, EPS Regulation and other GHG or carbon pricing regulations, together with its overall 2022 administration costs, in a future proceeding. 23 As set out in Enbridge Gas’s 2020 Application (EB-2019-0247), May 14, 2020, Updated Exhibit C, p. 7, included in the calculation of 2021 revenue requirement for the Union rate zones are capital costs related to additional billing system modifications previously expected to be incurred in 2019 and actually incurred in 2020. Page 885 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 11 of 12 Plus Attachments 29. The GGPPA and EPS Regulation impacts a wide variety of groups across the organization and wherever reasonable to do so Enbridge Gas has leveraged existing resources outside of the Carbon Strategy team and will continue to do so going forward. This approach is consistent with Enbridge Gas’s commitment to cost-effectiveness, productivity gains and continuous improvement. These ancillary resources and related costs will not be recorded in the GGEADA in 2022. Consulting and External Legal Support 30. Enbridge Gas anticipates that it will incur $0.30 million in consulting and external legal costs in 2022 for work supporting the development and sustainment of Enbridge Gas’s carbon strategy and related analyses, the review and interpretation of any new or updated regulations associated with the GGPPA, EPS Regulation, or other GHG or carbon pricing programs, and the development of Enbridge Gas’s Application and associated OEB proceedings. 31. These expenditures are required to ensure that Enbridge Gas remains well- informed of, and in compliance with, current and new regulatory requirements. Enbridge Gas also notes that it may incur additional consulting and external legal costs associated with other GHG or carbon policies. These costs will also be recorded in the GGEADA. GHG Reporting and Verification 32. In accordance with the OBPS Regulations, Enbridge Gas is required to have it’s annual OBPS report verified by a third-party auditor. The verification includes both the GHG emissions and the production from each specified industrial activity during the compliance period that was used in calculating the emissions limit.24 The emission report and verification report must be submitted by June 1 of the year following each compliance period. For the 2021 OBPS compliance period, 24 Output-Based Pricing System Regulations (SOR/2019-266), Schedule 5 – Application. https://laws- lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2019-266/index.html Page 886 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Page 12 of 12 Plus Attachments verification will be completed and submitted by June 1, 2022. Enbridge Gas anticipates the fees associated with 2021 emissions verification to be $0.05 million. Bad Debt 33. Enbridge Gas estimates that it will incur approximately $4.96 million in incremental bad debt expenses in 2022 based on forecasted costs recoverable from customers as a result of the GGPPA and EPS Regulation, as set out in Exhibit B. While Enbridge Gas has included total 2022 forecast bad debt costs in Table 3, only actual bad debt related to the GGPPA and EPS Regulation will be recorded in the GGEADAs for each rate zone. 34. Ongoing COVID-19 related conditions may impact bad debt related to the GGPPA and EPS Regulations beyond what Enbridge Gas would typically forecast. Consistent with the OEB’s Decision and Order on Enbridge Gas’s 2020 Application, Enbridge Gas will record bad debt expenses for the FCPP related to the COVID-19 emergency in the COVID-specific sub-account so that all matters related to the COVID-19 emergency are recorded in the same account.25 Other Miscellaneous Costs 35. Enbridge Gas expects to incur approximately $0.15 million in other miscellaneous costs for customer outreach and communications, training, conferences, travel expenses, memberships and subscriptions associated with the GGPPA, EPS Regulation or other GHG or carbon pricing programs in 2022. 25 EB-2019-0247, OEB Decision and Order, August 13, 2020, p. 11. Page 887 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0219 Exhibit C Attachment 1 Page 1 of 6 EGD RATE ZONE Accounting Entries for Facilityederal Carbon Charge – Facility Variance Account Variance Account No. 179-503 The purpose of the Facilityederal Carbon Charge – Facility Variance Account is to record the variance between actual facility carbon costs and actual facility costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Simple interest is to be calculated on the opening monthly balance of this account using the OEB approved EB-2006-0117 interest rate methodology. The balance of this account, together with carrying charges, will be disposed of in a manner designated by the OEB in a future rate hearing. Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998. Debit - Account No.179-503 Other Deferred Charges – Facilityederal Carbon Charge – Facility Variance Account Credit - Account No. 579 Miscellaneous Operating Revenue To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-503, the variance between actual facility carbon costs and facility carbon costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Debit - Account No.179-503 Other Deferred Charges – Facilityederal Carbon Charge – Facility Variance Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-503, interest on the balance in Deferral Account No. 179-503. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 888 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0219 Exhibit C Attachment 1 Page 2 of 6 EGD RATE ZONE Accounting Entries for Federal Customer Carbon Charge – Customer Variance Account Variance Account No. 179-502 The purpose of the CustomerFederal Carbon Charge – Customer Variance Account is to record the variance between actual federal customer carbon levy and actual federal customer levy recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Simple interest is to be calculated on the opening monthly balance of this account using the OEB approved EB-2006-0117 interest rate methodology. The balance of this account, together with carrying charges, will be disposed of in a manner designated by the OEB in a future rate hearing. Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998. Debit - Account No.179-502 Other Deferred Charges – CustomerFederal Carbon Charge – Customer Variance Account Credit - Account No. 579 Miscellaneous Operating Revenue To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-502, the variance between actual customer carbon levy costs and customer carbon levy costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Debit - Account No.179-502 Other Deferred Charges – CustomerFederal Carbon Charge – Customer Variance Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-502, interest on the balance in Variance Account No. 179-502. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 889 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0219 Exhibit C Attachment 1 Page 3 of 6 EGD RATE ZONE Accounting Entries for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account Deferral Account No. 179-501 Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998. Debit - Account No.179-501 Other Deferred Charges – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account Credit - Account No. 728 General Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-501, the Administration costs associated with the impacts of federal and provincial regulations related to greenhouse gas emission requirements. Debit - Account No.179-501 Other Deferred Charges – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-501, interest on the balance in Deferral Account No. 179-501. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 890 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0219 Exhibit C Attachment 1 Page 4 of 6 UNION RATE ZONES Accounting Entries for Facilityederal Carbon Charge – Facility Variance Account Variance Account No. 179-420 The purpose of the FacilityFederal Carbon Charge – Facility Variance Account is to record the variance between actual facility carbon costs and actual facility costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Simple interest is to be calculated on the opening monthly balance of this account using the OEB approved EB- 2006-0117 interest rate methodology. The balance of this account, together with carrying charges, will be disposed of in a manner designated by the OEB in a future rate hearing. Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act. Debit - Account No.179-420 Other Deferred Charges – Facilityederal Carbon Charge – Facility Variance Account Credit - Account No. 579 Miscellaneous Operating Revenue To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-420, the variance between actual facility carbon costs and facility carbon costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Debit - Account No.179-420 Other Deferred Charges – Facilityederal Carbon Charge – Facility Variance Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-420, interest on the balance in Deferral Account No. 179- 420. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 891 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0219 Exhibit C Attachment 1 Page 5 of 6 UNION RATE ZONES Accounting Entries for CustomerFederal Carbon Charge – Customer Variance Account Variance Account No. 179-421 The purpose of the CustomerFederal Carbon Charge – Customer Variance Account is to record the variance between actual federal customer carbon levy and actual federal customer levy recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Simple interest is to be calculated on the opening monthly balance of this account using the OEB approved EB- 2006-0117 interest rate methodology. The balance of this account, together with carrying charges, will be disposed of in a manner designated by the OEB in a future rate hearing. Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act. Debit - Account No.179- 421 Other Deferred Charges – CustomerFederal Carbon Charge – Customer Variance Account Credit - Account No. 579 Miscellaneous Operating Revenue To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-421, the variance between actual customer carbon levy costs and customer carbon levy costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Debit - Account No.179-421 Other Deferred Charges – CustomerFederal Carbon Charge – Customer Variance Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-421, interest on the balance in Variance Account No. 179-421. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 892 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0219 Exhibit C Attachment 1 Page 6 of 6 UNION RATE ZONES Accounting Entries for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration – Deferral Account Variance Account No. 179-422 Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act. Debit - Account No.179-422 Other Deferred Charges – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account Credit - Account No. 728 General Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-422, the Administration costs associated with the impacts of federal and provincial regulations related to greenhouse gas emission requirements. Debit - Account No.179-422 Other Deferred Charges – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-422, interest on the balance in Deferral Account No. 179-422. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 893 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Attachment 2 Page 1 of 6 EGD RATE ZONE Accounting Entries for Facility Carbon Charge – Variance Account Variance Account No. 179-503 The purpose of the Facility Carbon Charge – Variance Account is to record the variance between actual facility carbon costs and actual facility costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Simple interest is to be calculated on the opening monthly balance of this account using the OEB approved EB-2006-0117 interest rate methodology. The balance of this account, together with carrying charges, will be disposed of in a manner designated by the OEB in a future rate hearing. Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998. Debit - Account No.179-503 Other Deferred Charges – Facility Carbon Charge – Variance Account Credit - Account No. 579 Miscellaneous Operating Revenue To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-503, the variance between actual facility carbon costs and facility carbon costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Debit - Account No.179-503 Other Deferred Charges – Facility Carbon Charge – Variance Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-503, interest on the balance in Deferral Account No. 179-503. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 894 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Attachment 2 Page 2 of 6 EGD RATE ZONE Accounting Entries for Customer Carbon Charge – Variance Account Variance Account No. 179-502 The purpose of the Customer Carbon Charge – Variance Account is to record the variance between actual customer carbon levy and actual customer levy recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Simple interest is to be calculated on the opening monthly balance of this account using the OEB approved EB-2006-0117 interest rate methodology. The balance of this account, together with carrying charges, will be disposed of in a manner designated by the OEB in a future rate hearing. Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998. Debit - Account No.179-502 Other Deferred Charges – Customer Carbon Charge – Variance Account Credit - Account No. 579 Miscellaneous Operating Revenue To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-502, the variance between actual customer carbon levy costs and customer carbon levy costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Debit - Account No.179-502 Other Deferred Charges – Customer Carbon Charge – Variance Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-502, interest on the balance in Variance Account No. 179-502. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 895 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Attachment 2 Page 3 of 6 EGD RATE ZONE Accounting Entries for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account Deferral Account No. 179-501 Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998. Debit - Account No.179-501 Other Deferred Charges – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account Credit - Account No. 728 General Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-501, the Administration costs associated with the impacts of federal and provincial regulations related to greenhouse gas emission requirements. Debit - Account No.179-501 Other Deferred Charges – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-501, interest on the balance in Deferral Account No. 179-501. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 896 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Attachment 2 Page 4 of 6 UNION RATE ZONES Accounting Entries for Facility Carbon Charge – Variance Account Variance Account No. 179-420 The purpose of the Facility Carbon Charge – Variance Account is to record the variance between actual facility carbon costs and actual facility costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Simple interest is to be calculated on the opening monthly balance of this account using the OEB approved EB- 2006-0117 interest rate methodology. The balance of this account, together with carrying charges, will be disposed of in a manner designated by the OEB in a future rate hearing. Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act. Debit - Account No.179-420 Other Deferred Charges – Facility Carbon Charge – Variance Account Credit - Account No. 579 Miscellaneous Operating Revenue To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-420, the variance between actual facility carbon costs and facility carbon costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Debit - Account No.179-420 Other Deferred Charges – Facility Carbon Charge – Variance Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-420, interest on the balance in Deferral Account No. 179-420. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 897 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Attachment 2 Page 5 of 6 UNION RATE ZONES Accounting Entries for Customer Carbon Charge – Variance Account Variance Account No. 179-421 The purpose of the Customer Carbon Charge – Variance Account is to record the variance between actual customer carbon levy and actual customer levy recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Simple interest is to be calculated on the opening monthly balance of this account using the OEB approved EB- 2006-0117 interest rate methodology. The balance of this account, together with carrying charges, will be disposed of in a manner designated by the OEB in a future rate hearing. Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act. Debit - Account No.179- 421 Other Deferred Charges – Customer Carbon Charge – Variance Account Credit - Account No. 579 Miscellaneous Operating Revenue To record, as a debit (credit) in Variance Account No. 179-421, the variance between actual customer carbon levy costs and customer carbon levy costs recovered in rates as approved by the OEB. Debit - Account No.179-421 Other Deferred Charges – Customer Carbon Charge – Variance Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-421, interest on the balance in Variance Account No. 179-421. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 898 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit C Attachment 2 Page 6 of 6 UNION RATE ZONES Accounting Entries for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration – Deferral Account Variance Account No. 179-422 Account numbers are from the Uniform System of Accounts for Gas Utilities, Class A prescribed under the Ontario Energy Board Act. Debit - Account No.179-422 Other Deferred Charges – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account Credit - Account No. 728 General Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-422, the Administration costs associated with the impacts of federal and provincial regulations related to greenhouse gas emission requirements. Debit - Account No.179-422 Other Deferred Charges – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account Credit - Account No. 323 Other Interest Expense To record, as a debit (credit) in Deferral Account No. 179-422, interest on the balance in Deferral Account No. 179-422. Simple interest will be computed monthly on the opening balance in the said account in accordance with the methodology approved by the OEB in EB-2006-0117. Page 899 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Page 1 of 7 COST RECOVERY 1. The purpose of this exhibit of evidence is to support Enbridge Gas’s request to update the impacts of the GGPPA and EPS Regulation in rates for the EGD and Union rate zones, effective April 1, 2022 and to address the proposed allocation and disposition of Enbridge Gas’s 2020 FCPP-related deferral and variance account balances, as described at Exhibit C. Accordingly, Enbridge Gas requests approval of: (i) the proposed rate changes on a final basis, effective April 1, 2022;1 and (ii) the allocation and disposition of the 2020 FCPP-related deferral and variance account balances. 2. This exhibit of evidence is organized as follows: 1. 2022 FCPP-Related Unit Rates 1.1 2022 Federal Carbon Charge 1.2 2022 Facility Carbon Charge 1.3 Union South – Parkway Delivery Commitment Incentive Costs 1.4 2022 Administration Costs 1.5 Bill Impacts of Carbon Charges 2. 2020 Deferral and Variance Account Balances 2.1 2020 FCCCVA 2.2 2020 FCCFVA 2.3 2020 GGEADA 2.4 Proposed Disposition of Deferral and Variance Account Balances 2.5 Bill Impacts of Deferral and Variance Account Disposition Supporting schedules and appendices: Tab 1: Cost Recovery - EGD Rate Zone Tab 2: Cost Recovery - Union Rate Zones 1 Including for First Nations on-reserve customer as per that OEB’s determinations regarding the applicability of the FCPP-related charges to Indigenous customers. (EB-2019-0247, OEB Decision and Order, September 23, 2021, p. 31). Page 900 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Page 2 of 7 1. 2022 FCPP-Related Unit Rates 3. Under the GGPPA, Enbridge Gas is required to remit payment of the Federal Carbon Charge to the Government of Canada for volumes delivered to its customers and for Company Use Volumes. Effective January 1, 2022, Enbridge Gas will also be required to remit payment for any excess emissions related to EPS Volumes pursuant to Ontario’s EPS Regulation. These costs will be recovered from customers through the Federal Carbon Charge and Facility Carbon Charge unit rates, respectively. 4. The combined Federal Carbon Charge and Facility Carbon Charge unit rate for the April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023 period is summarized at Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 1, page 3 for the EGD rate zone and at Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 1, page 3 for the Union rate zones. A summary of the Federal Carbon Charge and Facility Carbon Charge unit rates by rate class for the April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023 period for the EGD rate zone is provided at Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 1, pages 4 to 5. 1.1 2022 Federal Carbon Charge 5. Effective April 1, 2022, Enbridge Gas proposes to increase the Federal Carbon Charge from 7.8300 ¢/m3 (or $40/tCO2e) to 9.7900 ¢/m3 (or $50/tCO2e), as outlined in the GGPPA and set out at Exhibit A, Table 1.2 6. The Federal Carbon Charge is applicable to distribution customers in all rate zones. Entities that are exempt under Part 1 of the GGPPA will not be charged the Federal Carbon Charge. Further, Enbridge Gas will apply 20% of the Federal Carbon Charge to distribution volumes for qualified commercial greenhouse customers, resulting in 80% greenhouse relief. The Federal Carbon Charge is shown as a separate line item on customers’ bills, where applicable. 2 The GGPPA, Schedule 2 and Schedule 4. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/G-11.55.pdf Page 901 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Page 3 of 7 7. Enbridge Gas will track the difference between the Federal Carbon Charge amount collected through rates and the actual costs incurred in the CCCVA for each of the EGD rate zone and the Union rate zones.3 8. The Federal Carbon Charge customer-related forecast volumes and costs by rate class for the April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023 period is set out at Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 1, page 1 for the EGD rate zone and at Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 1, page 1 for the Union rate zones. 1.2 2022 Facility Carbon Charge 9. Enbridge Gas incurs costs of compliance with the GGPPA and EPS Regulation that are associated with its own operations. Enbridge Gas’s Facility Carbon Charge costs are incurred in relation to both Company Use Volumes (generated from distribution buildings, boilers/line heaters and NGV fleet volumes) and EPS Volumes (generated from compressor fuel volumes). The estimated Facility Carbon Charge costs for the April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023 time period are $1.086 million for the EGD rate zone and $5.444 million for the Union rate zones, as detailed at Exhibit B, Tab 1 and at Exhibit B, Tab 2 respectively. 10. Enbridge Gas recovers Facility Carbon Charge costs from rate classes based on in-franchise delivery volumes and ex-franchise transportation volumes. All customers in each rate class are responsible for the Facility Carbon Charge costs, regardless of whether the customer is exempt from the Federal Carbon Charge. Enbridge Gas adds the Facility Carbon Charge to the current approved delivery or transportation charges on customers’ bills. 11. Effective April 1, 2022, Enbridge Gas is proposing to increase the Facility Carbon Charge from 0.0066 ¢/m3 to 0.0070 ¢/m3 for the EGD rate zone and from 3 An amendment to the wording of the approved FCPP-related deferral and variance accounting orders has been proposed in this application which will result in new acronyms for the FCPP-related deferral and variance accounts. Please refer to Exhibit C and Exhibit C Attachment 1 and 2 for more information. Page 902 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Page 4 of 7 0.0127 ¢/m3 to 0.0141 ¢/m3 for the Union rate zones. When expressed in $/GJ, the Facility Carbon Charge remains unchanged at $0.002/GJ for the EGD rate zone and increases from $0.003/GJ to $0.004/GJ for the Union rate zones. The derivation of the proposed 2022 Facility Carbon Charge for each rate zone is set out in Table 1. Table 1 Derivation of 2022 Facility Carbon Charges Line Rate Zones No. Particulars EGD Union (a) (b) 1 Total Facility Carbon Cost ($000's) 1,086 (1) 5,444 (2) 2 2022 Forecast Volumes (103m3) 15,541,716 (3) 38,669,274 (4) 3 Facility Carbon Charge (¢/m³) 0.0070 0.0141 (line 1 ÷ line 2 × 100) 4 Facility Carbon Charge ($/GJ) 0.002 0.004 (line 3 ÷ Heat Value × 10) (5) Notes: (1) Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 5. (2) Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 5. (3) Forecast volumes per Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 1. (4) Forecast volumes per Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 1. (5) Conversion to GJ based on heat value adjustment of 38.85 GJ/103m3 for the EGD rate zone. Conversion to GJ based on heat value adjustment of 39.32 GJ/103m3 for the Union rate zones. 12. Enbridge Gas will track the difference between the amount collected through rates and the actual costs incurred in the FCCVA for each of the EGD rate zone and the Union rate zones.4 4 An amendment to the wording of the approved FCPP-related deferral and variance accounting orders has been proposed in this application which will result in new acronyms for the FCPP-related deferral and variance accounts. Please refer to Exhibit C and Exhibit C Attachment 1 and 2 for more information. Page 903 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Page 5 of 7 13. Facility Carbon Charge forecast volumes by component, costs and unit rate for 2022 are detailed at Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 1, page 2 for the EGD rate zone and at Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 1, page 2 for the Union rate zones. 1.3 Union South – Parkway Delivery Commitment Incentive Costs 14. Enbridge Gas is proposing an update to the Parkway Delivery Commitment Incentive (“PDCI”) credit and PDCI costs recovered in Union South distribution rates as a result of the increase in the Facility Carbon Charge from $0.003/GJ to $0.004/GJ for the Union rate zones. Enbridge Gas includes the Facility Carbon Charge in the payment of the PDCI in the Union South rate zone for any continued obligated Daily Contract Quantity (“DCQ”) at Parkway. The PDCI credit is set at the M12 Dawn to Parkway rate at 100% load factor, which increased by $0.001/GJ as a result of the increase in the Facility Carbon Charge in the M12 commodity rate. By recovering the Facility Carbon Charge costs in Rate M12, the cost of the PDCI credit increases from $13.573 million to $13.665 million. The increase in the PDCI costs of $0.092 million is recovered in Union South in-franchise delivery rates. The derivation of the Union South in-franchise delivery unit rate changes and the calculation of the PDCI costs are provided at Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 2. 1.4 2022 Administration Costs 15. Administration costs incurred in 2022 will be recorded in the OEB-approved GGEADAs and disposed of in a future proceeding, as described at Exhibit A and Exhibit C. 1.5 Bill Impacts of Carbon Charges 16. For the EGD rate zone, the bill impact of the 2022 carbon charges for a typical residential customer with annual consumption of 2,400 m3 is an increase of $47.05 per year. Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 2 details customer bill impacts for the EGD rate zone relative to October 1, 2021 QRAM rates (EB-2021-0219). Page 904 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Page 6 of 7 17. For the Union rate zones, the bill impact of the 2022 carbon charges for a typical residential customer with annual consumption of 2,200 m3 is an increase of $43.14 per year. Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 3 details customer bill impacts for the Union rate zones relative to October 1, 2021 QRAM rates (EB-2021-0219). 2. 2020 Deferral and Variance Account Balances 18. Enbridge Gas is requesting approval of the allocation and disposition of the 2020 final balances in its GGEADA and FCCFVA for each of the EGD and Union rate zones. There is no FCCCVA balance for either the EGD or Union rate zones. A description of 2020 FCPP-related deferral and variance account balances is provided at Exhibit C. The deferral and variance account balances are provided at Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 3 for the EGD rate zone and at Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 4 for the Union rate zones. 2.1 2020 FCCCVA 19. There is no FCCCVA balance for the EGD or Union rate zones. 2.2 2020 FCCFVA 20. Enbridge Gas proposes to allocate FCCFVA balances to rate classes in proportion to actual in-franchise distribution and ex-franchise transportation volumes from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Unit rates for disposition are derived using actual volumes for the January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 time period. The methodology to derive the allocation and disposition unit rates is the same for the EGD and Union rate zones. 2.3 2020 GGEADA 21. Enbridge Gas proposes to allocate GGEADA balances to rate classes in proportion to the number of customers for the EGD rate zone and 2013 OEB-approved administrative and general expenses for the Union rate zones. The proposed allocation methodologies for each rate zone are consistent with the allocations approved in Enbridge Gas’s 2019 FCPP-related deferral and variance account Page 905 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Page 7 of 7 disposition (EB-2019-0247). Unit rates for disposition are derived using actual volumes for the January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 time period. The methodology to derive the disposition unit rates is the same for the EGD and Union rate zones. 2.4 Proposed Disposition of Deferral and Variance Account Balances 22. Enbridge Gas proposes to dispose of the balances with a one-time billing adjustment recovered in one month for all customers in the EGD and the Union rate zones. 23. Enbridge Gas proposes to dispose of the approved 2020 FCPP-related deferral and variance account balances with the first QRAM application following the Board’s approval, as early as April 1, 2022. Unit rates for disposition can be found at Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 4 for the EGD rate zone and at Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 5 for the Union rate zones. 2.5 Bill Impacts of Deferral and Variance Account Disposition 24. For the EGD rate zone, the bill impact of the proposed deferral and variance account balance disposition for a typical residential customer with annual consumption of 2,400 m3 is $0.76. Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 5 details the customer bill impacts for the EGD rate zone. 25. For the Union rate zones, the bill impact of the proposed deferral and variance account balance disposition for a typical residential customer with annual consumption of 2,200 m3 is $0.27 for customers in the Union South rate zone and $0.34 for customers in the Union North rate zone. Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 6 details customer bill impacts for the Union rate zones. Page 906 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 Line Rate Forecast Volumes1 Less: Transportation Volumes Customer-Related Forecast Volumes2 EPS Participant & Other Exempt Volumes3 Net Volumes4 Federal Carbon Charge5 Federal Carbon Cost6 Federal Carbon Charge Unit Rate7 (103m3) (103m3) (103m3) (103m3) (103m3) ($/m3)($) (¢/m3) 1.1 1 5,117,476 0 5,117,476 774 5,116,702 0.0979 500,925,158 1.2 6 4,751,842 0 4,751,842 132,463 4,619,379 0.0979 452,237,230 1.3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0.0979 0 1.4 100 31,239 0 31,239 0 31,239 0.0979 3,058,259 1.5 110 1,088,282 0 1,088,282 367,201 721,081 0.0979 70,593,783 1.6 115 363,479 0 363,479 359,267 4,212 0.0979 412,379 1.7a 125 558,826 0 558,826 558,826 0 0.0979 0 1.8 135 55,554 0 55,554 0 55,554 0.0979 5,438,707 1.9 145 17,407 0 17,407 4,218 13,189 0.0979 1,291,232 1.10 170 243,158 0 243,158 197,665 45,493 0.0979 4,453,809 1.11 200 188,317 0 188,317 188,317 0 0.0979 0 1.12 300 0 0 0 0 0 0.0979 0 1.13 332 3,100,386 3,100,386 0 0 0 0.0979 0 1 Total 15,515,967 3,100,386 12,415,581 1,808,731 10,606,849 1,038,410,558 9.7900 Notes: (1) Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Col. 1 + Rate 332 forecast volume. (2) Col. 1 - Col. 2. (3) Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Col. 2. (4) Col. 3 - Col. 4. (5) Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 5, Line 2. (6) Col. 5 x Col. 6 x 1000. (7) (Col. 7 / (Col. 5 x 1000)) x 100. EGD RATE ZONE TABLE 1: 2022 CUSTOMER-RELATED VOLUMES AND DERIVATION OF FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE UNIT RATE Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 1 Page 1 of 5 Page 907 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Line Utility Forecast Volume (Regulated)1 Carbon Charge2 Facility Carbon Cost Facility Carbon Charge Unit Rate (103m3) ($/m3)($) (¢/m 3) Company Use 2.1.1 Buildings 1,412 2.1.2 Boilers/Line Heaters 3,692 2.1.3 NGV Fleet 841 2.1 Total Company Use 5,946 0.0979 582,086 3 2.2 Compressor Fuel 16,134 -503,434 4 2 Total 22,080 1,085,520 0.0070 5 Notes: (1) Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 2, Col. 1. The Company Use forecast volumes for April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023 and the Compressor Fuel forecast volume for January 1 to December 31, 2022. (2) Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 5, Line 5. (3) Col. 2 x Col. 3 x 1000. (4) Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 5, Line 11. (5) Facility Carbon Cost / Total forecast volume = [Line 2, Col. 3 / (Table 1, Line 1, Col. 1 x 1000)] x 100. TABLE 2: 2022 FACILITY-RELATED VOLUMES AND DERIVATION OF FACILITY CARBON CHARGE UNIT RATE EGD RATE ZONE Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 1 Page 2 of 5 Page 908 Col. 1 Line Unit Rate (¢/m3) 1 Federal Carbon Charge 9.7900 1 2 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 2 3 Total 9.7970 3 Notes: (1) Table 1, Line 1, Col. 8. (2) Table 2, Line 2, Col. 4. (3) Line 1 + Line 2. EGD RATE ZONE TABLE 3: 2022 CARBON CHARGE UNIT RATE SUMMARY Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 1 Page 3 of 5 Page 909 Rate Class (¢/m3) Rate 1 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 6 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 9 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 100 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 110 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 115 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 125 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 135 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 145 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 EGD RATE ZONE TABLE 4: 2022 CARBON CHARGE UNIT RATE BY RATE CLASS Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 1 Page 4 of 5 Page 910 Rate Class (¢/m3) Rate 170 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 200 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)0.0000 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 300 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 300 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)9.7900 Interruptible Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 315 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)0.0000 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 316 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)0.0000 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 320 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)0.0000 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0000 Rate 325 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)0.0000 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 330 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)0.0000 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 331 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)0.0000 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Rate 332 Federal Carbon Charge (If Applicable)0.0000 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0070 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 1 Page 5 of 5 Page 911 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 1.1 VOLUME m³3,064 3,064 0 0.0%4,691 4,691 0 0.0% 1.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0%261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0% 1.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$267.52 267.51 0.01 0.0%403.39 403.37 0.02 0.0% 1.4 LOAD BALANCING § $165.65 165.65 0.00 0.0%253.61 253.61 0.00 0.0% 1.5 SALES COMMDTY $457.22 457.22 0.00 0.0%700.00 700.00 0.00 0.0% 1.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $299.97 239.91 60.05 25.0%459.25 367.31 91.94 25.0% 1.7 TOTAL SALES $ 1,452.31 1,392.25 60.07 4.3%2,078.21 1,986.25 91.96 4.6% 1.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $995.10 935.03 60.07 6.4%1,378.21 1,286.25 91.96 7.1% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 2.1 VOLUME m³1,955 1,955 0 0.0%2,005 2,005 0 0.0% 2.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0%261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0% 2.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$171.57 171.57 0.01 0.0%178.51 178.50 0.01 0.0% 2.4 LOAD BALANCING § $105.69 105.69 0.00 0.0%108.39 108.39 0.00 0.0% 2.5 SALES COMMDTY $291.73 291.73 0.00 0.0%299.19 299.19 0.00 0.0% 2.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $191.39 153.08 38.32 25.0%196.29 156.99 39.30 25.0% 2.7 TOTAL SALES $ 1,022.35 984.02 38.33 3.9%1,044.34 1,005.04 39.31 3.9% 2.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $730.62 692.29 38.33 5.5%745.15 705.85 39.31 5.6% §The Load Balancing Charge shown here includes transportation charges Heating, Water Htg. & Other Uses CHANGE (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing EGD RATE ZONE ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR NON-EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Heating Only CHANGE Heating & Water Htg. CHANGE CHANGE Heating & Water Htg. Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 1 of 16 Page 912 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 3.1 VOLUME m³5,048 5,048 0 0.0%1,081 1,081 0 0.0% 3.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0%261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0% 3.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$433.83 433.81 0.02 0.0%100.71 100.70 0.00 0.0% 3.4 LOAD BALANCING § $272.91 272.91 0.00 0.0%58.44 58.44 0.00 0.0% 3.5 SALES COMMDTY $753.27 753.27 0.00 0.0%161.31 161.31 0.00 0.0% 3.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $494.20 395.26 98.94 25.0%105.83 84.64 21.19 25.0% 3.7 TOTAL SALES $ 2,216.17 2,117.21 98.96 4.7%688.25 667.06 21.19 3.2% 3.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 1,462.89 1,363.93 98.96 7.3%526.94 505.75 21.19 4.2% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 4.1 VOLUME m³2,480 2,480 0 0.0%2,400 2,400 0 0.0% 4.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0%261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0% 4.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$218.41 218.40 0.01 0.0%211.42 211.41 0.01 0.0% 4.4 LOAD BALANCING § $134.07 134.07 0.00 0.0%129.75 129.75 0.00 0.0% 4.5 SALES COMMDTY $370.07 370.07 0.00 0.0%358.13 358.13 0.00 0.0% 4.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $242.79 194.18 48.61 25.0%234.96 187.92 47.04 25.0% 4.7 TOTAL SALES $ 1,227.31 1,178.69 48.62 4.1%1,196.22 1,149.17 47.05 4.1% 4.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $857.24 808.62 48.62 6.0%838.09 791.04 47.05 5.9% §The Load Balancing Charge shown here includes transportation charges (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing EGD RATE ZONE ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR NON-EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Heating & Water Htg. CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE Heating, Pool Htg. & Other Uses General & Water Htg. Heating & Water Htg. CHANGE Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 2 of 16 Page 913 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 1.1 VOLUME m³22,606 22,606 0 0.0%29,278 29,278 0 0.0% 1.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0%886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0% 1.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 1,602.12 1,602.03 0.09 0.0%2,055.70 2,055.58 0.12 0.0% 1.4 LOAD BALANCING § $ 1,202.93 1,202.93 0.00 0.0%1,557.96 1,557.96 0.00 0.0% 1.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 3,378.33 3,378.33 0.00 0.0%4,375.42 4,375.42 0.00 0.0% 1.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 2,213.13 1,770.05 443.08 25.0%2,866.32 2,292.47 573.85 25.0% 1.7 TOTAL SALES $ 9,283.18 8,840.02 443.17 5.0%11,742.08 11,168.12 573.97 5.1% 1.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 5,904.85 5,461.68 443.17 8.1%7,366.66 6,792.69 573.97 8.4% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 2.1 VOLUME m³ 169,563 169,563 0 0.0%339,125 339,125 0 0.0% 2.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0%886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0% 2.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 8,644.37 8,643.69 0.68 0.0%15,837.19 15,835.83 1.36 0.0% 2.4 LOAD BALANCING § $ 9,022.92 9,022.92 0.00 0.0%18,045.78 18,045.78 0.00 0.0% 2.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 25,340.19 25,340.19 0.00 0.0%50,680.23 50,680.23 0.00 0.0% 2.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 16,600.22 13,276.78 3,323.43 25.0%33,200.34 26,553.49 6,646.85 25.0% 2.7 TOTAL SALES $ 60,494.38 57,170.26 3,324.11 5.8%118,650.21 112,002.01 6,648.21 5.9% 2.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 35,154.19 31,830.07 3,324.11 10.4%67,969.98 61,321.78 6,648.21 10.8% §The Load Balancing Charge shown here includes transportation charges CHANGE Large Commercial Customer (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing EGD RATE ZONE ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR NON-EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 CHANGE Medium Commercial Customer CHANGE CHANGE Commercial Heating & Other Uses Com. Htg., Air Cond'ng & Other Uses Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 3 of 16 Page 914 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 3.1 VOLUME m³ 43,285 43,285 0 0.0%63,903 63,903 0 0.0% 3.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0%886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0% 3.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 2,841.43 2,841.26 0.17 0.0%3,812.96 3,812.70 0.26 0.0% 3.4 LOAD BALANCING § $ 2,303.31 2,303.31 0.00 0.0%3,400.46 3,400.46 0.00 0.0% 3.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 6,468.69 6,468.69 0.00 0.0%9,549.93 9,549.93 0.00 0.0% 3.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 4,237.60 3,389.22 848.39 25.0%6,256.10 5,003.60 1,252.50 25.0% 3.7 TOTAL SALES $ 16,737.71 15,889.15 848.56 5.3%23,906.12 22,653.37 1,252.75 5.5% 3.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 10,269.03 9,420.47 848.56 9.0%14,356.20 13,103.44 1,252.75 9.6% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 4.1 VOLUME m³ 169,563 169,563 0 0.0%339,124 339,124 0 0.0% 4.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0%886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0% 4.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 8,850.84 8,850.17 0.68 0.0%15,990.81 15,989.45 1.36 0.0% 4.4 LOAD BALANCING § $ 9,022.92 9,022.92 0.00 0.0%18,045.73 18,045.73 0.00 0.0% 4.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 25,340.19 25,340.19 0.00 0.0%50,680.08 50,680.08 0.00 0.0% 4.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 16,600.22 13,276.78 3,323.43 25.0%33,200.24 26,553.41 6,646.83 25.0% 4.7 TOTAL SALES $ 60,700.85 57,376.73 3,324.11 5.8%118,803.54 112,155.35 6,648.19 5.9% 4.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 35,360.66 32,036.55 3,324.11 10.4%68,123.46 61,475.27 6,648.19 10.8% §The Load Balancing Charge shown here includes transportation charges CHANGE CHANGE (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing EGD RATE ZONE ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR NON-EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 CHANGECHANGE Large Industrial CustomerMedium Industrial Customer Industrial Heating & Other UsesIndustrial General Use Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 4 of 16 Page 915 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 1.1 VOLUME m³ 339,188 339,188 0 0.0%598,567 598,567 0 0.0% 1.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 1,536.60 1,536.60 0.00 0.0%1,536.60 1,536.60 0.00 0.0% 1.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 14,144.43 14,143.08 1.36 0.0%68,796.26 68,793.87 2.39 0.0% 1.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 18,049.13 18,049.13 0.00 0.0%31,851.41 31,851.41 0.00 0.0% 1.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 50,689.64 50,689.64 0.00 0.0%89,452.30 89,452.30 0.00 0.0% 1.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 33,206.51 26,558.42 6,648.08 25.0%58,599.71 46,867.80 11,731.91 25.0% 1.7 TOTAL SALES $ 117,626.32 110,976.87 6,649.44 6.0%250,236.28 238,501.98 11,734.31 4.9% 1.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 66,936.67 60,287.23 6,649.44 11.0%160,783.98 149,049.68 11,734.31 7.9% (A) (B) (A) - (B) % 2.1 VOLUME m³ 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 0.0% 2.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 1,536.60 1,536.60 0.00 0.0% 2.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 138,167.63 138,161.63 6.00 0.0% 2.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 79,819.16 79,819.16 0.00 0.0% 2.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 224,166.14 224,166.14 0.00 0.0% 2.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 146,850.00 117,450.00 29,400.00 25.0% 2.7 TOTAL SALES $ 590,539.53 561,133.53 29,406.00 5.2% 2.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 366,373.39 336,967.39 29,406.00 8.7% ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - LARGE VOLUME CUSTOMERS EGD RATE ZONE INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR NON-EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Rate 100 - Large Industrial Firm CHANGE CHANGE Rate 100 - Small Commercial Firm Rate 100 - Average Commercial Firm CHANGE (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 5 of 16 Page 916 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 3.1 VOLUME m³ 339,188 339,188 0 0.0%598,568 598,568 0 0.0% 3.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 1,553.28 1,553.28 0.00 0.0%1,553.28 1,553.28 0.00 0.0% 3.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 18,821.36 18,820.00 1.36 0.0%30,092.43 30,090.04 2.39 0.0% 3.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 14,082.04 14,082.04 0.00 0.0%24,851.22 24,851.22 0.00 0.0% 3.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 50,504.21 50,504.21 0.00 0.0%89,125.22 89,125.22 0.00 0.0% 3.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 33,206.51 26,558.42 6,648.08 25.0%58,599.81 46,867.87 11,731.93 25.0% 3.7 TOTAL SALES $ 118,167.40 111,517.96 6,649.44 6.0%204,221.97 192,487.64 11,734.33 6.1% 3.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 67,663.18 61,013.74 6,649.44 10.9%115,096.74 103,362.42 11,734.33 11.4% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 4.1 VOLUME m³ 339,188 339,188 0 0.0%598,567 598,567 0 0.0% 4.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 1,553.28 1,553.28 0.00 0.0%1,553.28 1,553.28 0.00 0.0% 4.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 19,097.24 19,095.88 1.36 0.0%30,336.64 30,334.25 2.39 0.0% 4.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 14,082.04 14,082.04 0.00 0.0%24,851.18 24,851.18 0.00 0.0% 4.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 50,504.21 50,504.21 0.00 0.0%89,125.07 89,125.07 0.00 0.0% 4.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 33,206.51 26,558.42 6,648.08 25.0%58,599.71 46,867.80 11,731.91 25.0% 4.7 TOTAL SALES $ 118,443.28 111,793.84 6,649.44 5.9%204,465.88 192,731.57 11,734.31 6.1% 4.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 67,939.06 61,289.62 6,649.44 10.8%115,340.81 103,606.50 11,734.31 11.3% CHANGE CHANGE (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - LARGE VOLUME CUSTOMERS EGD RATE ZONE INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR NON-EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 CHANGE CHANGE Rate 145 - Small Industrial Interr.Rate 145 - Average Industrial Interr. Rate 145 - Average Commercial Interr.Rate 145 - Small Commercial Interr. Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 6 of 16 Page 917 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 5.1 VOLUME m³ 598,568 598,568 0 0.0%9,976,121 9,976,121 0 0.0% 5.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 7,351.92 7,351.92 0.00 0.0%7,351.92 7,351.92 0.00 0.0% 5.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 14,936.39 14,933.99 2.39 0.0%244,976.70 244,936.80 39.90 0.0% 5.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 26,317.98 26,317.98 0.00 0.0%438,632.42 438,632.42 0.00 0.0% 5.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 89,102.78 89,102.78 0.00 0.0%1,485,044.45 1,485,044.45 0.00 0.0% 5.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 58,599.81 46,867.87 11,731.93 25.0%976,662.25 781,130.27 195,531.97 25.0% 5.7 TOTAL SALES $ 196,308.87 184,574.54 11,734.33 6.4%3,152,667.73 2,957,095.85 195,571.88 6.6% 5.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 107,206.09 95,471.76 11,734.33 12.3%1,667,623.28 1,472,051.41 195,571.88 13.3% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 6.1 VOLUME m³ 9,976,120 9,976,120 0 0.0%69,832,850 69,832,850 0 0.0% 6.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 7,351.92 7,351.92 0.00 0.0%7,792.32 7,792.32 0.00 0.0% 6.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 195,822.83 195,782.92 39.90 0.0%1,041,712.29 1,041,432.96 279.33 0.0% 6.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 438,632.37 438,632.37 0.00 0.0%2,965,216.40 2,965,216.40 0.00 0.0% 6.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 1,485,044.30 1,485,044.30 0.00 0.0%10,395,311.57 10,395,311.57 0.00 0.0% 6.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 976,662.15 781,130.20 195,531.95 25.0%6,836,636.02 5,467,912.16 1,368,723.86 25.0% 6.7 TOTAL SALES $ 3,103,513.56 2,907,941.71 195,571.86 6.7%21,246,668.60 19,877,665.40 1,369,003.19 6.9% 6.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 1,618,469.27 1,422,897.41 195,571.86 13.7%10,851,357.03 9,482,353.83 1,369,003.19 14.4% EGD RATE ZONE INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR NON-EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Rate 110 - Small Ind. Firm - 50% LF Rate 110 - Average Ind. Firm - 50% LF (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - LARGE VOLUME CUSTOMERS CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE Rate 110 - Average Ind. Firm - 75% LF Rate 115 - Large Ind. Firm - 80% LF Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 7 of 16 Page 918 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 7.1 VOLUME m³ 598,567 598,567 0 0.0%9,976,121 9,976,121 0 0.0% 7.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 1,450.08 1,450.08 0.00 0.0%3,502.32 3,502.32 0.00 0.0% 7.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 11,618.37 11,615.97 2.39 0.0%88,010.92 87,971.02 39.90 0.0% 7.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 19,823.73 19,823.73 0.00 0.0%317,821.47 317,821.47 0.00 0.0% 7.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 89,146.27 89,146.27 0.00 0.0%1,485,044.44 1,485,044.44 0.00 0.0% 7.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 58,599.71 46,867.80 11,731.91 25.0%976,662.25 781,130.27 195,531.97 25.0% 7.7 TOTAL SALES $ 180,638.16 168,903.85 11,734.31 6.9%2,871,041.39 2,675,469.51 195,571.88 7.3% 7.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 91,491.89 79,757.58 11,734.31 14.7%1,385,996.96 1,190,425.08 195,571.88 16.4% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 8.1 VOLUME m³ 9,976,120 9,976,120 0 0.0%69,832,850 69,832,850 0 0.0% 8.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 3,502.32 3,502.32 0.00 0.0%3,502.32 3,502.32 0.00 0.0% 8.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 80,478.23 80,438.32 39.90 0.0%445,809.04 445,529.71 279.33 0.1% 8.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 317,821.44 317,821.44 0.00 0.0%2,224,750.37 2,224,750.37 0.00 0.0% 8.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 1,485,044.29 1,485,044.29 0.00 0.0%10,395,311.49 10,395,311.49 0.00 0.0% 8.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $ 976,662.15 781,130.20 195,531.95 25.0%6,836,636.02 5,467,912.16 1,368,723.86 25.0% 8.7 TOTAL SALES $ 2,863,508.42 2,667,936.56 195,571.86 7.3%19,906,009.24 18,537,006.04 1,369,003.19 7.4% 8.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 1,378,464.13 1,182,892.27 195,571.86 16.5%9,510,697.74 8,141,694.55 1,369,003.19 16.8% ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - LARGE VOLUME CUSTOMERS EGD RATE ZONE INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR NON-EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Rate 135 - Seasonal Firm Rate 170 - Average Ind. Interr. - 50% LF (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE Rate 170 - Average Ind. Interr. - 75% LF Rate 170 - Large Ind. Interr. - 75% LF Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 8 of 16 Page 919 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 1.1 VOLUME m³3,064 3,064 0 0.0%4,691 4,691 0 0.0% 1.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0%261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0% 1.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$267.52 267.51 0.01 0.0%403.39 403.37 0.02 0.0% 1.4 LOAD BALANCING § $165.65 165.65 0.00 0.0%253.61 253.61 0.00 0.0% 1.5 SALES COMMDTY $457.22 457.22 0.00 0.0%700.00 700.00 0.00 0.0% 1.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 1.7 TOTAL SALES $ 1,152.35 1,152.33 0.01 0.0%1,618.96 1,618.94 0.02 0.0% 1.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $695.13 695.12 0.01 0.0%918.96 918.94 0.02 0.0% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 2.1 VOLUME m³1,955 1,955 0 0.0%2,005 2,005 0 0.0% 2.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0%261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0% 2.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$171.57 171.57 0.01 0.0%178.51 178.50 0.01 0.0% 2.4 LOAD BALANCING § $105.69 105.69 0.00 0.0%108.39 108.39 0.00 0.0% 2.5 SALES COMMDTY $291.73 291.73 0.00 0.0%299.19 299.19 0.00 0.0% 2.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 2.7 TOTAL SALES $830.96 830.95 0.01 0.0%848.05 848.05 0.01 0.0% 2.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $539.23 539.22 0.01 0.0%548.86 548.86 0.01 0.0% §The Load Balancing Charge shown here includes transportation charges CHANGE CHANGE Heating Only Heating & Water Htg. CHANGE CHANGE EGD RATE ZONE ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Heating & Water Htg.Heating, Water Htg. & Other Uses (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 9 of 16 Page 920 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 3.1 VOLUME m³5,048 5,048 0 0.0%1,081 1,081 0 0.0% 3.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0%261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0% 3.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$433.83 433.81 0.02 0.0%100.71 100.70 0.00 0.0% 3.4 LOAD BALANCING § $272.91 272.91 0.00 0.0%58.44 58.44 0.00 0.0% 3.5 SALES COMMDTY $753.27 753.27 0.00 0.0%161.31 161.31 0.00 0.0% 3.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 3.7 TOTAL SALES $ 1,721.97 1,721.95 0.02 0.0%582.42 582.41 0.00 0.0% 3.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $968.70 968.68 0.02 0.0%421.11 421.11 0.00 0.0% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 4.1 VOLUME m³2,480 2,480 0 0.0%2,400 2,400 0 0.0% 4.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0%261.96 261.96 0.00 0.0% 4.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$218.41 218.40 0.01 0.0%211.42 211.41 0.01 0.0% 4.4 LOAD BALANCING § $134.07 134.07 0.00 0.0%129.75 129.75 0.00 0.0% 4.5 SALES COMMDTY $370.07 370.07 0.00 0.0%358.13 358.13 0.00 0.0% 4.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 4.7 TOTAL SALES $984.52 984.51 0.01 0.0%961.26 961.25 0.01 0.0% 4.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $614.45 614.44 0.01 0.0%603.13 603.12 0.01 0.0% §The Load Balancing Charge shown here includes transportation charges CHANGE CHANGE Heating & Water Htg.Heating & Water Htg. CHANGE CHANGE EGD RATE ZONE ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Heating, Pool Htg. & Other Uses General & Water Htg. (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 10 of 16 Page 921 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 1.1 VOLUME m³ 22,606 22,606 0 0.0%29,278 29,278 0 0.0% 1.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0%886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0% 1.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 1,602.12 1,602.03 0.09 0.0%2,055.70 2,055.58 0.12 0.0% 1.4 LOAD BALANCING § $ 1,202.93 1,202.93 0.00 0.0%1,557.96 1,557.96 0.00 0.0% 1.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 3,378.33 3,378.33 0.00 0.0%4,375.42 4,375.42 0.00 0.0% 1.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 1.7 TOTAL SALES $ 7,070.06 7,069.97 0.09 0.0%8,875.77 8,875.65 0.12 0.0% 1.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 3,691.72 3,691.63 0.09 0.0%4,500.34 4,500.22 0.12 0.0% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 2.1 VOLUME m³ 169,563 169,563 0 0.0%339,125 339,125 0 0.0% 2.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0%886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0% 2.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 8,644.37 8,643.69 0.68 0.0%15,837.19 15,835.83 1.36 0.0% 2.4 LOAD BALANCING § $ 9,022.92 9,022.92 0.00 0.0%18,045.78 18,045.78 0.00 0.0% 2.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 25,340.19 25,340.19 0.00 0.0%50,680.23 50,680.23 0.00 0.0% 2.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 2.7 TOTAL SALES $ 43,894.16 43,893.48 0.68 0.0%85,449.88 85,448.52 1.36 0.0% 2.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 18,553.97 18,553.29 0.68 0.0%34,769.65 34,768.29 1.36 0.0% §The Load Balancing Charge shown here includes transportation charges CHANGE CHANGE Medium Commercial Customer Large Commercial Customer CHANGE CHANGE EGD RATE ZONE ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Commercial Heating & Other Uses Com. Htg., Air Cond'ng & Other Uses (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 11 of 16 Page 922 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 3.1 VOLUME m³43,285 43,285 0 0.0%63,903 63,903 0 0.0% 3.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0%886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0% 3.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 2,841.43 2,841.26 0.17 0.0%3,812.96 3,812.70 0.26 0.0% 3.4 LOAD BALANCING § $ 2,303.31 2,303.31 0.00 0.0%3,400.46 3,400.46 0.00 0.0% 3.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 6,468.69 6,468.69 0.00 0.0%9,549.93 9,549.93 0.00 0.0% 3.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 3.7 TOTAL SALES $ 12,500.11 12,499.94 0.17 0.0%17,650.02 17,649.76 0.26 0.0% 3.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 6,031.42 6,031.25 0.17 0.0%8,100.09 8,099.84 0.26 0.0% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 4.1 VOLUME m³ 169,563 169,563 0 0.0%339,124 339,124 0 0.0% 4.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0%886.68 886.68 0.00 0.0% 4.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 8,850.84 8,850.17 0.68 0.0%15,990.81 15,989.45 1.36 0.0% 4.4 LOAD BALANCING § $ 9,022.92 9,022.92 0.00 0.0%18,045.73 18,045.73 0.00 0.0% 4.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 25,340.19 25,340.19 0.00 0.0%50,680.08 50,680.08 0.00 0.0% 4.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 4.7 TOTAL SALES $ 44,100.63 44,099.95 0.68 0.0%85,603.30 85,601.94 1.36 0.0% 4.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 18,760.44 18,759.76 0.68 0.0%34,923.22 34,921.86 1.36 0.0% §The Load Balancing Charge shown here includes transportation charges CHANGE CHANGE Medium Industrial Customer Large Industrial Customer CHANGE CHANGE EGD RATE ZONE ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Industrial General Use Industrial Heating & Other Uses (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 12 of 16 Page 923 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 1.1 VOLUME m³ 339,188 339,188 0 0.0%598,567 598,567 0 0.0% 1.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 1,536.60 1,536.60 0.00 0.0%1,536.60 1,536.60 0.00 0.0% 1.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 14,144.43 14,143.08 1.36 0.0%68,796.26 68,793.87 2.39 0.0% 1.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 18,049.13 18,049.13 0.00 0.0%31,851.41 31,851.41 0.00 0.0% 1.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 50,689.64 50,689.64 0.00 0.0%89,452.30 89,452.30 0.00 0.0% 1.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 1.7 TOTAL SALES $ 84,419.81 84,418.45 1.36 0.0%191,636.58 191,634.18 2.39 0.0% 1.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 33,730.17 33,728.81 1.36 0.0%102,184.27 102,181.88 2.39 0.0% (A) (B) (A) - (B) % 2.1 VOLUME m³ 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 0.0% 2.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 1,536.60 1,536.60 0.00 0.0% 2.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 138,167.63 138,161.63 6.00 0.0% 2.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 79,819.16 79,819.16 0.00 0.0% 2.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 224,166.14 224,166.14 0.00 0.0% 2.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 2.7 TOTAL SALES $ 443,689.53 443,683.53 6.00 0.0% 2.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 219,523.39 219,517.39 6.00 0.0% EGD RATE ZONE ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - LARGE VOLUME CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Rate 100 - Small Commercial Firm Rate 100 - Average Commercial Firm (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing CHANGE CHANGE Rate 100 - Large Industrial Firm CHANGE Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 13 of 16 Page 924 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 3.1 VOLUME m³ 339,188 339,188 0 0.0%598,568 598,568 0 0.0% 3.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 1,553.28 1,553.28 0.00 0.0%1,553.28 1,553.28 0.00 0.0% 3.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 18,821.36 18,820.00 1.36 0.0%30,092.43 30,090.04 2.39 0.0% 3.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 14,082.04 14,082.04 0.00 0.0%24,851.22 24,851.22 0.00 0.0% 3.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 50,504.21 50,504.21 0.00 0.0%89,125.22 89,125.22 0.00 0.0% 3.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 3.7 TOTAL SALES $ 84,960.89 84,959.54 1.36 0.0%145,622.16 145,619.77 2.39 0.0% 3.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 34,456.68 34,455.32 1.36 0.0%56,496.94 56,494.54 2.39 0.0% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 4.1 VOLUME m³ 339,188 339,188 0 0.0%598,567 598,567 0 0.0% 4.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 1,553.28 1,553.28 0.00 0.0%1,553.28 1,553.28 0.00 0.0% 4.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 19,097.24 19,095.88 1.36 0.0%30,336.64 30,334.25 2.39 0.0% 4.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 14,082.04 14,082.04 0.00 0.0%24,851.18 24,851.18 0.00 0.0% 4.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 50,504.21 50,504.21 0.00 0.0%89,125.07 89,125.07 0.00 0.0% 4.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 4.7 TOTAL SALES $ 85,236.77 85,235.42 1.36 0.0%145,866.17 145,863.78 2.39 0.0% 4.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 34,732.56 34,731.20 1.36 0.0%56,741.10 56,738.70 2.39 0.0% CHANGE CHANGE Rate 145 - Small Industrial Interr.Rate 145 - Average Industrial Interr. CHANGE CHANGE EGD RATE ZONE ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - LARGE VOLUME CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Rate 145 - Small Commercial Interr.Rate 145 - Average Commercial Interr. (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 14 of 16 Page 925 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 5.1 VOLUME m³ 598,568 598,568 0 0.0%9,976,121 9,976,121 0 0.0% 5.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 7,351.92 7,351.92 0.00 0.0%7,351.92 7,351.92 0.00 0.0% 5.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 14,936.39 14,933.99 2.39 0.0%244,976.70 244,936.80 39.90 0.0% 5.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 26,317.98 26,317.98 0.00 0.0%438,632.42 438,632.42 0.00 0.0% 5.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 89,102.78 89,102.78 0.00 0.0%1,485,044.45 1,485,044.45 0.00 0.0% 5.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 5.7 TOTAL SALES $ 137,709.06 137,706.67 2.39 0.0%2,176,005.48 2,175,965.58 39.90 0.0% 5.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 48,606.28 48,603.89 2.39 0.0%690,961.04 690,921.13 39.90 0.0% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 6.1 VOLUME m³ 9,976,120 9,976,120 0 0.0%69,832,850 69,832,850 0 0.0% 6.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 7,351.92 7,351.92 0.00 0.0%7,792.32 7,792.32 0.00 0.0% 6.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 195,822.83 195,782.92 39.90 0.0%1,041,712.29 1,041,432.96 279.33 0.0% 6.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 438,632.37 438,632.37 0.00 0.0%2,965,216.40 2,965,216.40 0.00 0.0% 6.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 1,485,044.30 1,485,044.30 0.00 0.0%10,395,311.57 10,395,311.57 0.00 0.0% 6.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 6.7 TOTAL SALES $ 2,126,851.42 2,126,811.51 39.90 0.0%14,410,032.58 14,409,753.25 279.33 0.0% 6.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 641,807.12 641,767.22 39.90 0.0%4,014,721.01 4,014,441.68 279.33 0.0% CHANGE CHANGE Rate 110 - Average Ind. Firm - 75% LF Rate 115 - Large Ind. Firm - 80% LF CHANGE CHANGE EGD RATE ZONE INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Rate 110 - Small Ind. Firm - 50% LF Rate 110 - Average Ind. Firm - 50% LF (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - LARGE VOLUME CUSTOMERS Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 15 of 16 Page 926 Item No. Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 7.1 VOLUME m³ 598,567 598,567 0 0.0%9,976,121 9,976,121 0 0.0% 7.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 1,450.08 1,450.08 0.00 0.0%3,502.32 3,502.32 0.00 0.0% 7.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 11,618.37 11,615.97 2.39 0.0%88,010.92 87,971.02 39.90 0.0% 7.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 19,823.73 19,823.73 0.00 0.0%317,821.47 317,821.47 0.00 0.0% 7.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 89,146.27 89,146.27 0.00 0.0%1,485,044.44 1,485,044.44 0.00 0.0% 7.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 7.7 TOTAL SALES $ 122,038.45 122,036.06 2.39 0.0%1,894,379.14 1,894,339.24 39.90 0.0% 7.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 32,892.18 32,889.79 2.39 0.0%409,334.71 409,294.81 39.90 0.0% (A) (B) (A) (B) (A) - (B) % (A) - (B) % 8.1 VOLUME m³ 9,976,120 9,976,120 0 0.0%69,832,850 69,832,850 0 0.0% 8.2 CUSTOMER CHG.$ 3,502.32 3,502.32 0.00 0.0%3,502.32 3,502.32 0.00 0.0% 8.3 DISTRIBUTION CHG.$ 80,478.23 80,438.32 39.90 0.0%445,809.04 445,529.71 279.33 0.1% 8.4 LOAD BALANCING $ 317,821.44 317,821.44 0.00 0.0%2,224,750.37 2,224,750.37 0.00 0.0% 8.5 SALES COMMDTY $ 1,485,044.29 1,485,044.29 0.00 0.0%10,395,311.49 10,395,311.49 0.00 0.0% 8.6 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 8.7 TOTAL SALES $ 1,886,846.27 1,886,806.36 39.90 0.0%13,069,373.22 13,069,093.89 279.33 0.0% 8.8 TOTAL T-SERVICE $ 401,801.98 401,762.08 39.90 0.0%2,674,061.73 2,673,782.40 279.33 0.0% CHANGE CHANGE Rate 170 - Average Ind. Interr. - 75% LF Rate 170 - Large Ind. Interr. - 75% LF CHANGE CHANGE EGD RATE ZONE ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON - LARGE VOLUME CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FEDERAL CARBON PRICING IMPACTS FOR EPS PARTICIPANTS AND RIDER K BILL 32 Rate 135 - Seasonal Firm Rate 170 - Average Ind. Interr. - 50% LF (A) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2022 Federal Carbon Pricing vs (B) EB-2021-0219 Inclusive of 2021 Federal Carbon Pricing Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 2 Page 16 of 16 Page 927 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 (Col. 1 + Col. 2 + Col. 3) ($000's)($000's)($000's)($000's) 1.1 Balance - (40)1,683 1,643 1.2 Interest - (4)15 11 1 Total - (44)1,698 1,654 Notes: (1) Exhibit C, Page 8, Paragraph 18. (2) Exhibit C, Page 8, Paragraph 20 . (3) Exhibit C, Page 4, Table 1. EGD RATE ZONE TABLE 5: SUMMARY OF 2020 FEDERAL CARBON DEFERRAL AND VARIANCE ACCOUNTS Line Rate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account3 Federal Carbon Charge - Facility Variance Account2 Total Federal Carbon Charge - Customer Variance Account1 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 3 Page 1 of 2 Page 928 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 (Col. 1 + Col. 2 + Col. 3) ($000's)($000's)($000's)($000's) 1.1 1 - (15)1,569 1,554 1.2 6 - (14)129 114 1.3 9 - 0 0 0 1.4 100 - (0)0 (0) 1.5 110 - (3)0 (3) 1.6 115 - (1)0 (1) 1.7 125 - (2)0 (2) 1.8 135 - (0)0 (0) 1.9 145 - (0)0 (0) 1.10 170 - (1)0 (1) 1.11 200 - (1)0 (1) 1.12 300 - (0)0 0 1.13 315 - 0 0 0 1.14 332 - (7)0 (7) 1 Total - (44)1,698 1,654 Notes: (1) Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 4, Page 1, Table 7 (2) Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 4, Page 2, Table 8 (3) Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 4, Page 3, Table 9 EGD RATE ZONE TABLE 6: SUMMARY OF ALLOCATION OF 2020 FEDERAL CARBON DEFERRAL AND VARIANCE ACCOUNTS Line Rate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Administration Deferral Account3 Federal Carbon Charge - Facility Variance Account2 Total Federal Carbon Charge - Customer Variance Account1 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 3 Page 2 of 2 Page 929 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 (Col. 1 + Col. 2) ($000's)($000's)($000's) 1.1 1 - - - 1.2 6 - - - 1.3 9 - - - 1.4 100 - - - 1.5 110 - - - 1.6 115 - - - 1.7 125 - - - 1.8 135 - - - 1.9 145 - - - 1.10 170 - - - 1.11 200 - - - 1.12 300 - - - 1.13 315 - - - 1.14 332 - - - 1 Total - - - Notes: (1) The balance by rate class = The total balance in Line 1, Col. 1 x (volume for each rate class in Col. 4 / total volume in Line 1, Col. 4) (2) The interest amount by rate class = The total interest in Line 1, Col. 2 x (the balance for each rate class in Col. 1 / the total balance in Line 1, Col. 1) (3) Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 3, Page 1, Line 1, Col. 1 TABLE 7: 2020 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE - CUSTOMER VARIANCE ACCOUNT CLEARANCE UNIT RATES EGD RATE ZONE Interest2 Total Balance to be Cleared3LineRateBalance to be Cleared1 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 4 Page 1 of 7 Page 930 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 (Col. 1 + Col. 2)(Col. 3 / Col. 4) ($000's)($000's)($000's) (103m3) (¢/m3) 1.1 1 (14)(1)(15)4,894,404 (0.0003) 1.2 6 (13)(1)(14)4,650,326 (0.0003) 1.3 9 0 0 0 0 0.0000 1.4 100 (0)(0)(0)20,111 (0.0003) 1.5 110 (3)(0)(3)981,141 (0.0003) 1.6 115 (1)(0)(1)378,039 (0.0003) 1.7 125 (1)(0)(2)526,029 (0.0003) 1.8 135 (0)(0)(0)65,287 (0.0003) 1.9 145 (0)(0)(0)23,396 (0.0003) 1.10 170 (1)(0)(1)247,430 (0.0003) 1.11 200 (1)(0)(1)189,473 (0.0003) 1.12 300 (0)(0)(0)204 (0.0003) 1.13 315 0 0 0 0 0.0000 1.14 332 (6)(1)(7)2,288,139 (0.0003) 1 Total (40)(4)(44)14,263,977 Notes: (1) The balance by rate class = The total balance in Line 1, Col. 1 x (volume for each rate class in Col. 4 / total volume in Line 1, Col. 4) (2) The interest amount by rate class = The total interest in Line 1, Col. 2 x (the balance for each rate class in Col. 1 / the total balance in Line 1, Col. 1) (3) Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 3, Page 1, Line 1, Col. 2 TABLE 8: 2020 FEDERAL CARBON CHARGE - FACILITY VARIANCE ACCOUNT CLEARANCE UNIT RATES EGD RATE ZONE Total Balance to be Cleared3RateLine Actual Volumes (Jan - Dec 2020)Unit RateBalance to be Cleared1 Interest2 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 4 Page 2 of 7 Page 931 Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 (Col. 2 + Col. 3)(Col. 4 / Col. 5) ($000's)($000's)($000's) (103m3) (¢/m3) 1.1 1 2,064,531 1,555 14 1,569 4,894,404 0.0321 1.2 6 169,084 127 1 129 4,650,326 0.0028 1.3 9 2 0 0 0 0 0.0000 1.4 100 9 0 0 0 20,111 0.0000 1.5 110 335 0 0 0 981,141 0.0000 1.6 115 20 0 0 0 378,039 0.0000 1.7 125 4 0 0 0 526,029 0.0000 1.8 135 40 0 0 0 65,287 0.0000 1.9 145 22 0 0 0 23,396 0.0001 1.10 170 21 0 0 0 247,430 0.0000 1.11 200 1 0 0 0 189,473 0.0000 1.12 300 1 0 0 0 204 0.0004 1.13 315 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 1.14 332 1 0 0 0 2,288,139 0.0000 1 Total 2,234,071 1,683 15 1,698 14,263,977 Notes: (1) The balance by rate class = The total balance in Line 1, Col. 2 x (number of customer for each rate class in Col. 1 / total number of customer in Line 1, Col. 1) (2) The interest amount by rate class = The total interest in Line 1, Col. 3 x (the balance for each rate class in Col. 2 / the total balance in Line 1, Col. 2) (3) Exhibit D, Tab 1, Schedule 3, Page 1, Line 1, Col. 3 TABLE 9: 2020 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ADMINISTRATION DEFERRAL ACCOUNT CLEARANCE UNIT RATES EGD RATE ZONE Actual Volumes (Jan - Dec 2020) Total Balance to be Cleared3 Unit RateRateLineInterest22020 Number of Customers Balance to be Cleared1 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 4 Page 3 of 7 Page 932 The following adjustment is applicable to consumption volumes for the period January 1 to December 31, 2020. Rate Class Unit Rate Unit Rate (¢/m3) (¢/m3) Rate 1 0.0318 0.0318 Rate 6 0.0025 0.0025 Rate 9 0.0000 0.0000 Rate 100 (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 110 (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 115 (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 125 (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 135 (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 145 (0.0002)(0.0002) Rate 170 (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 200 (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 300 0.0001 0.0001 Rate 300 Interruptible 0.0001 0.0001 Rate 315 0.0000 0.0000 Rate 332 (0.0003)(0.0003) (1) Includes Voluntary Participants and Other Exempt Gas Volumes OBPS1Non-OBPS EGD RATE ZONE TABLE 10: 2020 FEDERAL CARBON DEFERRAL AND VARIANCE ACCOUNT CLEARANCE UNIT RATE SUMMARY BY RATE CLASS Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 4 Page 4 of 7 Page 933 The following adjustment is applicable to consumption volumes for the period January 1 to December 31, 2020. Rate Class Non-OBPS OBPS1 (¢/m3) (¢/m3) Rate 1 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0321 0.0321 Total 0.0318 0.0318 Rate 6 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0028 0.0028 Total 0.0025 0.0025 Rate 9 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related 0.0000 0.0000 GGEADA 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 Rate 100 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0000 0.0000 Total (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 110 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0000 0.0000 Total (0.0003)(0.0003) EGD RATE ZONE TABLE 11: 2020 FEDERAL CARBON DEFERRAL AND VARIANCE ACCOUNT CLEARANCE UNIT RATE BREAKDOWN BY RATE CLASS Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 4 Page 5 of 7 Page 934 Rate Class Non-OBPS OBPS1 (¢/m3) (¢/m3) Rate 115 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0000 0.0000 Total (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 125 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0000 0.0000 Total (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 135 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0000 0.0000 Total (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 145 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0001 0.0001 Total (0.0002)(0.0002) Rate 170 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0000 0.0000 Total (0.0003)(0.0003) Rate 200 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0000 0.0000 Total (0.0003)(0.0003) Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 4 Page 6 of 7 Page 935 Rate Class Non-OBPS OBPS1 (¢/m3) (¢/m3) Rate 300 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0004 0.0004 Total 0.0001 0.0001 Rate 300 Customer-Related 0.0000 Interruptible Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0004 0.0004 Total 0.0001 0.0001 Rate 315 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related 0.0000 0.0000 GGEADA 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 Rate 332 Customer-Related 0.0000 Facility-Related (0.0003)(0.0003) GGEADA 0.0000 0.0000 Total (0.0003)(0.0003) (1) Includes Voluntary Participants and Other Exempt Gas Volumes Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 4 Page 7 of 7 Page 936 Item No.Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 Col. 9 Col. 10 Col. 11 Col. 12 Col. 13 GENERAL SERVICE Annual Unit Rate Total Adjustment October 2021 Bill October 2021 Bill Including Total Adjustment % Impact Unit Rate Total Adjustment October 2021 Bill October 2021 Bill Including Total Adjustment % Impact m3 ¢/m3 $$$%¢/m3 $$$% 1.1 RATE 1 RESIDENTIAL 1.2 Heating & Water Heating 2,400 0.0318 0.76 1,149 1,150 0.1% 0.0318 0.76 961 962 0.1% 2.1 RATE 6 COMMERCIAL 2.2 Commercial - Heating & Other Uses 22,606 0.0025 0.57 8,840 8,841 0.0% 0.0025 0.57 7,070 7,071 0.0% 2.3 General Use 43,285 0.0025 1.08 15,889 15,890 0.0% 0.0025 1.08 12,500 12,501 0.0% CONTRACT SERVICE 3.1 RATE 100 3.2 Industrial - small size 339,188 (0.0003) (1.02) 110,977 110,976 0.0% (0.0003)(1.02)84,418 84,417 0.0% 4.1 RATE 110 4.2 Industrial - small size, 50% LF 598,568 (0.0003) (1.80) 184,575 184,573 0.0% (0.0003)(1.80) 137,707 137,705 0.0% 4.3 Industrial - avg. size, 75% LF 9,976,121 (0.0003) (29.93) 2,907,942 2,907,912 0.0% (0.0003) (29.93) 2,126,812 2,126,782 0.0% 5.1 RATE 115 5.2 Industrial - large size, 80% LF 69,832,850 (0.0003) (209.50) 19,877,665 19,877,456 0.0% (0.0003) (209.50) 14,409,753 14,409,544 0.0% 6.1 RATE 135 6.2 Industrial - Seasonal Firm 598,567 (0.0003) (1.80) 168,904 168,902 0.0% (0.0003)(1.80) 122,036 122,034 0.0% 7.1 RATE 145 7.2 Commercial - avg. size 598,568 (0.0002)(1.20) 192,488 192,486 0.0% (0.0002)(1.20) 145,620 145,619 0.0% 8.1 RATE 170 8.2 Industrial - avg. size, 75% LF 9,976,120 (0.0003) (29.93) 2,667,937 2,667,907 0.0% (0.0003) (29.93) 1,886,806 1,886,776 0.0% Notes: Col. 5 = Col. 3 x Col. 4 / 100 Col. 6 is the approved October 2021 annual bill for Sales Service customer from EB-2021-0219, Exhibit C, Tab 4, Schedule 7 Col. 7 = Col. 5 + Col. 6 Col. 8 = Col. 5 / Col. 6 Col. 10 = Col. 3 x Col. 9 / 100 Col. 11 is the approved October 2021 annual bill for Sales Service customer from EB-2021-0219, Exhibit C, Tab 4, Schedule 8 Col. 12 = Col. 10 + Col. 11 Col. 13 = Col. 10 / Col. 11 EGD RATE ZONE 2020 FEDERAL CARBON DEFERRAL AND VARIANCE ACCOUNT CLEARANCE Bill Adjustment for April 2022 for Typical Customers Volume Annual Bill Impact for Non-OBPS Annual Bill Impact for OBPS Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 1 Schedule 5 Page 1 of 1 Page 937 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 1 of 3 UNION RATE ZONES 2022 Customer-Related Volumes and Derivation of Federal Carbon Charge Unit Rate Effective April 1, 2022 Forecast Less:Customer-Related EPS Participant & Federal Federal Federal Carbon Line Volumes Transportation Forecast Other Exempt Volumes Net Volumes Carbon Charge Carbon Cost Charge Unit Rate No Rate Class (103m3) (1)Volumes (103m3)Volumes (103m3) (2)(103m3) (3)(103m3)($/m3) (4)($) (¢/m3) (a)(b)(c) = (a - b)(d)(e) = (c - d)(f)(g) = (e * f * 1000)(h) = (g/(e*1000))*100 Union South In-Franchise Delivery 1 Rate M1 3,138,672 - 3,138,672 2,932 3,135,740 0.0979 306,988,977 2 Rate M2 1,290,399 - 1,290,399 85,030 1,205,369 0.0979 118,005,649 3 Rate M4 593,748 - 593,748 230,441 363,307 0.0979 35,567,741 4 Rate M5 62,137 - 62,137 15,072 47,065 0.0979 4,607,652 5 Rate M7 685,559 - 685,559 533,307 152,251 0.0979 14,905,387 6 Rate M9 88,845 - 88,845 88,845 - 0.0979 - 7 Rate M10 360 - 360 91 269 0.0979 26,319 8 Rate T1 416,900 - 416,900 315,758 101,141 0.0979 9,901,718 9 Rate T2 4,226,389 - 4,226,389 4,226,389 - 0.0979 - 10 Rate T3 264,209 - 264,209 264,209 - 0.0979 - 11 Total Union South In-Franchise 10,767,217 - 10,767,217 5,762,075 5,005,142 490,003,443 Union North In-Franchise Delivery 12 Rate 01 1,027,027 - 1,027,027 430 1,026,597 0.0979 100,503,890 13 Rate 10 368,229 - 368,229 12,741 355,488 0.0979 34,802,267 14 Rate 20 796,103 - 796,103 666,156 129,947 0.0979 12,721,782 15 Rate 25 91,136 - 91,136 82,109 9,027 0.0979 883,733 16 Rate 100 1,036,246 - 1,036,246 1,036,246 - 0.0979 - 17 Total Union North In-Franchise 3,318,742 - 3,318,742 1,797,683 1,521,059 148,911,672 18 Total In-Franchise 14,085,959 - 14,085,959 7,559,758 6,526,201 638,915,115 Ex-Franchise 19 Rate M12 - Firm Transportation 20,024,339 20,024,339 - - - 0.0979 - 20 Rate M13 60,493 60,493 - - - 0.0979 - 21 Rate M16 284,851 284,851 - - - 0.0979 - 22 Rate M17 26,325 26,325 - - - 0.0979 - 23 Rate C1 - Firm Transportation 4,187,306 4,187,306 - - - 0.0979 - 24 Total Ex-Franchise 24,583,315 24,583,315 - - - - 25 Total In-Franchise & Ex-Franchise 38,669,274 24,583,315 14,085,959 7,559,758 6,526,201 638,915,115 9.7900 Notes: (1)Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 1, Col. 1 + ex-franchise forecast volumes. (2)Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 1, Col. 1. (3)Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 1, Col. 2. (4)Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 5, Line 2. Page 938 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 2 of 3 UNION RATE ZONES 2022 Facility-Related Volumes and Derivation of Facility Carbon Charge Unit Rate Effective April 1, 2022 Forecast Federal Facility Facility Carbon Line Volumes Carbon Charge Carbon Cost Charge Unit Rate No.Particulars (103m3) (1)($/m3) (2)($)(¢/m3) (a)(b)(c)(d) Company Use 1 Buildings 1,636 2 Boilers/Line Heaters 20,199 3 NGV Fleet - 4 Total Company Use 21,835 0.0979 2,137,624 (3) 5 Compressor Fuel 151,067 3,306,207 (4) 6 Total 172,901 5,443,831 0.0141 (5) Notes: (1) Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 2, Col 1. (2) Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 5, Line 5. (3) Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 5, Line 6. The Company Use cost is for April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023. (4) Exhibit B, Tab 2, Schedule 5, Line 11. The Compressor Fuel cost is for January 1 to December 31, 2022. (5) Total Facility Carbon Cost / Total Forecast Volumes = [column (c) / (Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 1, p. 1, line 25, column (a) x 1000)] x 100. Page 939 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 1 Page 3 of 3 UNION RATE ZONES Effective April 1, 2022 Line No.Particulars (¢/m3)Unit Rate (a) 1 Federal Carbon Charge 9.7900 (1) 2 Facility Carbon Charge 0.0141 (2) 3 Total (line 1 + line 2)9.8041 Notes: (1)Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 1, p. 1, line 25, column (h). (2)Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 1, p. 2, line 6, column (d). 2022 Carbon Charge Unit Rate Summary Page 940 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 2 Page 1 of 5 UNION RATE ZONES Calculation of Union South In-franchise Unit Rate Change Parkway Delivery Commitment Incentive (PDCI) Costs Updated to Include Facility Carbon Charge Effective April 1, 2022 2021 PDCI 2021 Unit Rate Line Billing Cost Change Forecast Change No.Particulars Units ($000's) (1)Usage (2)(cents / m³) (a)(b)(c)=(a / b*100) Rate M1 Monthly Delivery Commodity Charge 1 First 100 m³10³m³13 1,024,850 0.0012 2 Next 150 m³10³m³10 886,720 0.0012 3 All over 250 m³10³m³12 1,231,298 0.0010 4 Total Rate M1 35 3,142,868 0.0011 Rate M2 Monthly Delivery Commodity Charge 5 First 1,000 m³10³m³1 89,660 0.0012 6 Next 6,000 m³10³m³5 387,949 0.0011 7 Next 13,000 m³10³m³4 371,413 0.0011 8 All over 20,000 m³10³m³5 491,412 0.0010 9 Total Rate M2 15 1,340,433 0.0011 Rate M4 Monthly Demand Charge 10 First 8,450 m³10³m³/d 2 22,504 0.0098 11 Next 19,700 m³10³m³/d 1 22,181 0.0044 12 All over 28,150 m³10³m³/d 0 5,323 0.0037 Monthly Delivery Commodity Charge 13 First Block 10³m³2 707,550 0.0003 14 All remaining use 10³m³0 400 0.0001 15 Total Rate M4 6 707,951 0.0008 Rate M5A Firm contracts 16 Monthly Delivery Commodity Charge 10³m³0 6,033 0.0001 17 Total Delivery - Firm M5A 0 6,033 0.0003 Interruptible contracts 18 Delivery Commodity Charge (Avg Price)10³m³1 62,898 0.0009 19 Total Delivery -Interruptible M5A 1 62,898 0.0009 20 Total Rate M5A 1 68,930 0.0009 Rate M7 Firm Contracts 21 Monthly Delivery Commodity Charge 10³m³3 514,268 0.0007 22 Total Delivery - Firm M7 3 514,268 0.0007 Interruptible / Seasonal Contracts 23 Monthly Delivery Commodity Charge 10³m³1 80,964 0.0009 24 Total Rate M7 4 595,232 0.0007 Rate M9 25 Monthly Delivery Commodity Charge 10³m³2 103,990 0.0015 26 Total Rate M9 2 103,990 0.0015 Rate M10 27 Monthly Delivery Commodity Charge 10³m³0 391 0.0014 28 Total Rate M10 0 391 0.0014 Notes: (1)Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 2, p. 3, column (i). (2)EB-2020-0095, Exhibit D, Tab 2, Rate Order, Working Papers, Schedule 11, column (a). Page 941 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 2 Page 2 of 5 UNION RATE ZONES Calculation of Union South In-franchise Unit Rate Change Parkway Delivery Commitment Incentive (PDCI) Costs Updated to Include Facility Carbon Charge Effective April 1, 2022 2021 PDCI 2021 Unit Rate Line Billing Cost Change Forecast Change No.Particulars Units ($000's) (1)Usage (2)(cents / m³) (a)(b)(c)=(a / b*100) Rate T1 Transportation Firm 1 All Volumes 10³m³4 409,921 0.0011 2 Interruptible 10³m³1 35,053 0.0014 3 Total Rate T1 5 444,974 0.0011 Rate T2 Transportation Firm 4 All Volumes 10³m³20 4,417,252 0.0005 5 Interruptible 10³m³0 154,339 0.0002 6 Total Rate T2 20 4,571,591 0.0004 Rate T3 Transportation 7 Commodity 10³m³4 283,374 0.0014 8 Total Rate T3 4 283,374 0.0014 9 Total PDCI Cost Change 92 Notes: (1)Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 2, p. 3, column (i). (2)EB-2020-0095, Exhibit D, Tab 2, Rate Order, Working Papers, Schedule 11, column (a). Page 942 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 2 Page 3 of 5 Line Dawn-Parkway Commodity Total PDCI Dawn-Parkway Commodity Total PDCI Dawn-Parkway Commodity Total No.Particulars ($000's)Demand Costs Costs Costs Demand Costs (2)Costs (3)Costs Demand Costs Costs Costs (a)(b)(c) = (a + b)(d)(e)(f) = (d + e)(g) = (d - a)(h) = (e - b)(i) = (g + h) 1 Rate M1 5,371 993 6,364 5,371 1,028 6,399 - 35 35 2 Rate M2 2,046 413 2,459 2,046 428 2,474 - 15 15 3 Rate M4 452 159 610 452 164 616 - 6 6 4 Rate M5 - Firm 2 0 2 2 0 2 - 0 0 5 Rate M5 - Interruptible - 17 17 - 17 17 - 1 1 6 Rate M7 - Firm 376 98 474 376 101 478 - 3 3 7 Rate M7 - Interruptible - 21 21 - 22 22 - 1 1 8 Rate M9 123 43 166 123 44 168 - 2 2 9 Rate M10 1 0 1 1 0 1 - 0 0 10 Rate T1 - Firm 309 121 430 309 126 435 - 4 4 11 Rate T1 - Interruptible - 14 14 - 15 15 - 1 1 12 Rate T2 - Firm 1,766 562 2,328 1,766 582 2,348 - 20 20 13 Rate T2 - Interruptible - 9 9 - 10 10 - 0 0 14 Rate T3 560 117 676 560 121 681 - 4 4 15 Total Costs 11,005 2,568 13,573 11,005 2,660 13,665 - 92 92 Notes: (1)EB-2020-0095, Exhibit D, Tab 2, Rate Order, Working Papers, Schedule 11, p.2, columns (d), (e), and (f), Updated for the 2021 Facility Carbon Charge of $0.003 GJ/d. (2)Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 2, p.4, column (b) + Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 2, p.5, column (b). (3)Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 2, p.4, column (d) + Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 2, p.5, column (d). UNION RATE ZONES Rate Adjustment Summary based on Changes to the Parkway Delivery Commitment Incentive (PDCI) Costs Updated for the 2022 Facility Carbon Charge PDCI Costs per EB-2020-0095 (1)Updated PDCI Costs Difference Page 943 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 2 Page 4 of 5 2021 Forecast 2021 Forecast 11 TJ Sales Service Dawn-Parkway Design 11 TJ Sales Service Delivery Volumes Fuel and UFG Total Sales Service Line Day Demands Demand Costs (1)East of Dawn Costs (3)PDCI Costs No.Particulars (103m3/d)($000's)(103m3)($000's)($000's) (a)(b)(c)(d)(e) = (b + d) 1 Rate M1 24,218 235 2,406,084 45 280 2 Rate M2 9,225 90 1,001,962 19 108 3 Rate M4 2,037 20 384,337 7 27 4 Rate M5 Firm 10 0 761 0 0 5 Rate M5 Interruptible - - 40,239 1 1 6 Rate M7 Firm 1,697 16 236,844 4 21 7 Rate M7 Interruptible - - 50,841 1 1 8 Rate M9 555 5 103,990 2 7 9 Rate M10 5 0 391 0 0 10 Rate T1 Firm 1,394 14 294,006 6 19 11 Rate T1 Interruptible - - 35,053 1 1 12 Rate T2 Firm 7,964 77 1,362,146 25 103 13 Rate T2 Interruptible - - 22,760 0 0 14 Rate T3 2,523 24 283,374 5 30 15 Total 49,627 482 (2)6,222,787 116 (4)598 Notes: (1)Allocated in proportion to column (a). Parkway Delivery Obligation of 11 TJ/d as per EB-2020-0095, Exhibit B, Tab 1, Appendix A, column (g), line 25. (3)Calculated as 11 TJ x $0.12/GJ/d x 365 = $0.482 million. Rate represents the M12 Dawn-Parkway demand rate per EB-2020-0095. (3)Allocated in proportion to column (c). (4) UNION RATE ZONES Derivation of the 2021 Sales Service PDCI Costs Updated for the 2022 Facility Carbon Charge Demand Costs Commodity Costs Calculated as 11 TJ x $0.029/GJ/d x 365 = $0.116 million. Rate represents the average Dawn-Parkway (TCPL / EGT) fuel rate per EB-2020-0095 Rate M12 Schedule 'C' at October 2020 QRAM Dawn Reference WACOG. Page 944 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 2 Page 5 of 5 2021 Forecast 240 TJ DP 2021 Forecast 240 TJ DP Dawn-Parkway Design Demand Delivery Volumes Fuel and UFG Total DP Line Day Demands Costs (1)East of Dawn Costs (3)PDCI Costs No.Particulars (103m3/d)($000's)(103m3)($000's)($000's) (a)(b)(c)(d)(e) = (b+d) 1 Rate M1 24,218 5,135 2,406,084 983 6,119 2 Rate M2 9,225 1,956 1,001,962 409 2,366 3 Rate M4 2,037 432 384,337 157 589 4 Rate M5 Firm 10 2 761 0 2 5 Rate M5 Interruptible - - 40,239 16 16 6 Rate M7 Firm 1,697 360 236,844 97 457 7 Rate M7 Interruptible - - 50,841 21 21 8 Rate M9 555 118 103,990 42 160 9 Rate M10 5 1 391 0 1 10 Rate T1 Firm 1,394 296 294,006 120 416 11 Rate T1 Interruptible - - 35,053 14 14 12 Rate T2 Firm 7,964 1,689 1,362,146 557 2,245 13 Rate T2 Interruptible - - 22,760 9 9 14 Rate T3 2,523 535 283,374 116 651 15 Total 49,627 10,524 (2)6,222,787 2,543 (4)13,067 Notes: (1)Allocated in proportion to column (a). Parkway Delivery Obligation of 249 TJ/d as per EB-2020-0095, Exhibit B, Tab 1, Appendix A, column (g), line 13 + line 19 adjusted by 9 TJ/d to reflect the annual impact of a seasonal Parkway Delivery Obligation. (2)Calculated as 240 TJ x $0.12/GJ/d x 365 = $10.524 million. Rate represents the M12 Dawn-Parkway demand rate per EB-2020-0095. (3)Allocated in proportion to column (c). (4) UNION RATE ZONES Derivation of the 2021 Direct Purchase (DP) PDCI Costs Updated for the 2022 Facility Carbon Charge Demand Costs Commodity Costs Calculated as 240 TJ x $0.029/GJ/d x 365 = $2.543 million. Rate represents the average Dawn-Parkway (TCPL / EGT) fuel rate per EB-2020-0095 Rate M12 Schedule 'C' at October 2020 QRAM Dawn Reference WACOG. Page 945 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit Tab 2 Schedule 3 Page 1 of 3 UNION RATE ZONES Union North In-Franchise Calculation of 2022 Sales Service and Direct Purchase Bill Impacts for Typical Small and Large Customers Total Total Total Bill Including Federal Excluding Federal Line Bill Unit Rate Bill Unit Rate Change Carbon Charge Carbon Charge No. Particulars ($)(cents/m3)($) (cents/m 3)($) (%) (%) (a)(b)(c)(d) (e) = (c - a) (f) = (e / a)(g) Small Rate 01 1 Delivery Charges 489 22.2200 489 22.2214 0.03 0.0%0.0% 2 Federal Carbon Charge 172 7.8300 215 9.7900 43.11 25.0%0.0% 3 Gas Supply Charges (1)556 25.2514 556 25.2514 - 0.0%0.0% 4 Total Bill 1,217 55.3018 1,260 57.2627 43.14 3.5%0.0% 5 Sales Service Impact 43.14 3.5%0.0% 6 Bundled-T (Direct Purchase) Impact 43.14 5.1%0.0% Small Rate 10 7 Delivery Charges 5,240 8.7326 5,240 8.7340 1 0.0%0.0% 8 Federal Carbon Charge 4,698 7.8300 5,874 9.7900 1,176 25.0%0.0% 9 Gas Supply Charges (1)13,950 23.2500 13,950 23.2500 - 0.0%0.0% 10 Total Bill 23,888 39.8126 25,064 41.7740 1,177 4.9%0.0% 11 Sales Service Impact 1,177 4.9%0.0% 12 Bundled-T (Direct Purchase) Impact 1,177 8.6%0.0% Large Rate 10 13 Delivery Charges 17,128 6.8514 17,132 6.8528 4 0.0%0.0% 14 Federal Carbon Charge 19,575 7.8300 24,475 9.7900 4,900 25.0%0.0% 15 Gas Supply Charges (1)58,125 23.2500 58,125 23.2500 - 0.0%0.0% 16 Total Bill 94,828 37.9314 99,732 39.8928 4,904 5.2%0.0% 17 Sales Service Impact 4,904 5.2%0.0% 18 Bundled-T (Direct Purchase) Impact 4,904 9.4%0.0% Small Rate 20 19 Delivery Charges 90,953 3.0318 90,995 3.0332 42 0.0%0.0% 20 Federal Carbon Charge 234,900 7.8300 293,700 9.7900 58,800 25.0%0.0% 21 Gas Supply Charges (1)570,456 19.0152 570,456 19.0152 - 0.0%0.0% 22 Total Bill 896,309 29.8770 955,151 31.8384 58,842 6.6%0.0% 23 Sales Service Impact 58,842 6.6%0.0% 24 Bundled-T (Direct Purchase) Impact 58,842 14.7%0.0% Large Rate 20 25 Delivery Charges 355,876 2.3725 356,086 2.3739 210 0.1%0.1% 26 Federal Carbon Charge 1,174,500 7.8300 1,468,500 9.7900 294,000 25.0%0.0% 27 Gas Supply Charges (1)2,798,517 18.6568 2,798,517 18.6568 - 0.0%0.0% 28 Total Bill 4,328,893 28.8593 4,623,103 30.8207 294,210 6.8%0.0% 29 Sales Service Impact 294,210 6.8%0.0% 30 Bundled-T (Direct Purchase) Impact 294,210 15.9%0.0% Average Rate 25 31 Delivery Charges 74,481 3.2739 74,513 3.2753 32 0.0%0.0% 32 Federal Carbon Charge 178,133 7.8300 222,723 9.7900 44,590 25.0%0.0% 33 Gas Supply Charges (1)401,490 17.6479 401,490 17.6479 - 0.0%0.0% 34 Total Bill 654,103 28.7518 698,725 30.7132 44,622 6.8%0.0% 35 Sales Service Impact 44,622 6.8%0.0% 36 T-Service (Direct Purchase) Impact 44,622 17.7%0.0% Small Rate 100 37 Delivery Charges 323,228 1.1971 323,606 1.1985 378 0.1%0.1% 38 Federal Carbon Charge 2,114,100 7.8300 2,643,300 9.7900 529,200 25.0%0.0% 39 Gas Supply Charges (1)5,938,923 21.9960 5,938,923 21.9960 - 0.0%0.0% 40 Total Bill 8,376,251 31.0232 8,905,829 32.9846 529,578 6.3%0.0% 41 Sales Service Impact 529,578 6.3%0.0% 42 T-Service (Direct Purchase) Impact 529,578 21.7%0.1% Large Rate 100 43 Delivery Charges 2,640,428 1.1002 2,643,788 1.1016 3,360 0.1%0.1% 44 Federal Carbon Charge 18,792,000 7.8300 23,496,000 9.7900 4,704,000 25.0%0.0% 45 Gas Supply Charges (1)52,213,993 21.7558 52,213,993 21.7558 - 0.0%0.0% 46 Total Bill 73,646,421 30.6860 78,353,781 32.6474 4,707,360 6.4%0.0% 47 Sales Service Impact 4,707,360 6.4%0.0% 48 T-Service (Direct Purchase) Impact 4,707,360 22.0%0.1% Notes: (1) Gas Supply charges based on Union North East Zone. Approved - EB-2021-0219 Proposed - EB-2021-0209 Bill Impact Page 946 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit E Tab 2 Schedule 3 Page 2 of 3 UNION RATE ZONES Union South In-Franchise Calculation of 2022 Sales Service and Direct Purchase Bill Impacts for Typical Small and Large Customers Total Total Total Bill Including Federal Excluding Federal Line Bill Unit Rate Bill Unit Rate Change Carbon Charge Carbon Charge No. Particulars ($) (cents/m 3) ($) (cents/m 3)($) (%) (%) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) = (c - a) (f) = (e / a) (g) Small Rate M1 1 Delivery Charges 415 18.8427 415 18.8441 0.03 0.0% 0.0% 2 Federal Carbon Charge 172 7.8300 215 9.7900 43.11 25.0% 0.0% 3 Gas Supply Charges 370 16.8382 370 16.8382 - 0.0% 0.0% 4 Total Bill 957 43.5114 1,000 45.4723 43.14 4.5% 0.0% 5 Sales Service Impact 43.14 4.5% 0.0% 6 Direct Purchase Impact 43.14 7.4% 0.0% Small Rate M2 7 Delivery Charges 4,393 7.3216 4,394 7.3241 2 0.0% 0.0% 8 Federal Carbon Charge 4,698 7.8300 5,874 9.7900 1,176 25.0% 0.0% 9 Gas Supply Charges 10,104 16.8392 10,104 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 10 Total Bill 19,194 31.9908 20,372 33.9533 1,178 6.1% 0.0% 11 Sales Service Impact 1,178 6.1% 0.0% 12 Direct Purchase Impact 1,178 13.0% 0.0% Large Rate M2 13 Delivery Charges 14,809 5.9235 14,815 5.9259 6 0.0% 0.0% 14 Federal Carbon Charge 19,575 7.8300 24,475 9.7900 4,900 25.0% 0.0% 15 Gas Supply Charges 42,098 16.8392 42,098 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 16 Total Bill 76,482 30.5927 81,388 32.5551 4,906 6.4% 0.0% 17 Sales Service Impact 4,906 6.4% 0.0% 18 Direct Purchase Impact 4,906 14.3% 0.0% Small Rate M4 19 Delivery Charges 52,841 6.0389 52,861 6.0413 21 0.0% 0.0% 20 Federal Carbon Charge 68,513 7.8300 85,663 9.7900 17,150 25.0% 0.0% 21 Gas Supply Charges 147,343 16.8392 147,343 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 22 Total Bill 268,696 30.7081 285,867 32.6705 17,171 6.4% 0.0% 23 Sales Service Impact 17,171 6.4% 0.0% 24 Direct Purchase Impact 17,171 14.1% 0.0% Large Rate M4 25 Delivery Charges 417,481 3.4790 417,715 3.4810 234 0.1% 0.1% 26 Federal Carbon Charge 939,600 7.8300 1,174,800 9.7900 235,200 25.0% 0.0% 27 Gas Supply Charges 2,020,704 16.8392 2,020,704 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 28 Total Bill 3,377,785 28.1482 3,613,219 30.1102 235,434 7.0% 0.0% 29 Sales Service Impact 235,434 7.0% 0.0% 30 Direct Purchase Impact 235,434 17.3% 0.1% Small Rate M5 31 Delivery Charges 35,419 4.2932 35,438 4.2955 19 0.1% 0.1% 32 Federal Carbon Charge 64,598 7.8300 80,768 9.7900 16,170 25.0% 0.0% 33 Gas Supply Charges 138,923 16.8392 138,923 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 34 Total Bill 238,940 28.9624 255,129 30.9247 16,189 6.8% 0.0% 35 Sales Service Impact 16,189 6.8% 0.0% 36 Direct Purchase Impact 16,189 16.2% 0.1% Large Rate M5 37 Delivery Charges 204,257 3.1424 204,407 3.1447 150 0.1% 0.1% 38 Federal Carbon Charge 508,950 7.8300 636,350 9.7900 127,400 25.0% 0.0% 39 Gas Supply Charges 1,094,548 16.8392 1,094,548 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 40 Total Bill 1,807,755 27.8116 1,935,305 29.7739 127,550 7.1% 0.0% 41 Sales Service Impact 127,550 7.1% 0.0% 42 Direct Purchase Impact 127,550 17.9% 0.1% Small Rate M7 43 Delivery Charges 811,015 2.2528 811,771 2.2549 756 0.1% 0.1% 44 Federal Carbon Charge 2,818,800 7.8300 3,524,400 9.7900 705,600 25.0% 0.0% 45 Gas Supply Charges 6,062,112 16.8392 6,062,112 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 46 Total Bill 9,691,927 26.9220 10,398,283 28.8841 706,356 7.3% 0.0% 47 Sales Service Impact 706,356 7.3% 0.0% 48 Direct Purchase Impact 706,356 19.5% 0.1% Large Rate M7 49 Delivery Charges 3,182,715 6.1206 3,183,807 6.1227 1,092 0.0% 0.0% 50 Federal Carbon Charge 4,071,600 7.8300 5,090,800 9.7900 1,019,200 25.0% 0.0% 51 Gas Supply Charges 8,756,384 16.8392 8,756,384 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 52 Total Bill 16,010,699 30.7898 17,030,991 32.7519 1,020,292 6.4% 0.0% 53 Sales Service Impact 1,020,292 6.4% 0.0% 54 Direct Purchase Impact 1,020,292 14.1% 0.0% Approved - EB-2021-0219 Proposed - EB-2021-0209 Bill Impact Page 947 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit E Tab 2 Schedule 3 Page 3 of 3 UNION RATE ZONES Union South In-Franchise Calculation of 2022 Sales Service and Direct Purchase Bill Impacts for Typical Small and Large Customers Total Total Total Bill Including Federal Excluding Federal Line Bill Unit Rate Bill Unit Rate Change Carbon Charge Carbon Charge No. Particulars ($) (cents/m 3) ($) (cents/m 3)($) (%) (%) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) = (c - a) (f) = (e / a) (g) Small Rate M9 1 Delivery Charges 192,354 2.7677 192,555 2.7706 202 0.1% 2 Gas Supply Charges 1,170,324 16.8392 1,170,324 16.8392 - 0.0% 3 Total Bill 1,362,678 19.6069 1,362,880 19.6098 202 0.0% 4 Sales Service Impact 202 0.0% 5 Direct Purchase Impact 202 0.1% Large Rate M9 6 Delivery Charges 571,772 2.8336 572,357 2.8365 585 0.1% 7 Gas Supply Charges 3,397,814 16.8392 3,397,814 16.8392 - 0.0% 8 Total Bill 3,969,586 19.6728 3,970,171 19.6757 585 0.0% 9 Sales Service Impact 585 0.0% 10 Direct Purchase Impact 585 0.1% Average Rate M10 11 Delivery Charges 7,536 7.9747 7,539 7.9775 3 0.0% 12 Gas Supply Charges 15,913 16.8392 15,913 16.8392 - 0.0% 13 Total Bill 23,449 24.8139 23,452 24.8167 3 0.0% 14 Sales Service Impact 3 0.0% 15 Direct Purchase Impact 3 0.0% Small Rate T1 16 Delivery Charges 167,946 2.2283 168,135 2.2308 188 0.1% 0.1% 17 Federal Carbon Charge 590,147 7.8300 737,872 9.7900 147,725 25.0% 0.0% 18 Gas Supply Charges 1,269,171 16.8392 1,269,171 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 19 Total Bill 2,027,264 26.8975 2,175,177 28.8600 147,914 7.3% 0.0% 20 Sales Service Impact 147,914 7.3% 0.0% 21 Direct Purchase Impact 147,914 19.5% 0.1% Average Rate T1 22 Delivery Charges 261,709 2.2628 261,998 2.2653 289 0.1% 0.1% 23 Federal Carbon Charge 905,613 7.8300 1,132,305 9.7900 226,692 25.0% 0.0% 24 Gas Supply Charges 1,947,611 16.8392 1,947,611 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 25 Total Bill 3,114,933 26.9320 3,341,914 28.8945 226,982 7.3% 0.0% 26 Sales Service Impact 226,982 7.3% 0.0% 27 Direct Purchase Impact 226,982 19.4% 0.1% Large Rate T1 28 Delivery Charges 591,056 2.3066 591,697 2.3091 641 0.1% 0.1% 29 Federal Carbon Charge 2,006,365 7.8300 2,508,597 9.7900 502,232 25.0% 0.0% 30 Gas Supply Charges 4,314,890 16.8392 4,314,890 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 31 Total Bill 6,912,312 26.9758 7,415,184 28.9383 502,873 7.3% 0.0% 32 Sales Service Impact 502,873 7.3% 0.0% 33 Direct Purchase Impact 502,873 19.4% 0.1% Small Rate T2 34 Delivery Charges 759,220 1.2813 760,346 1.2832 1,126 0.1% 0.1% 35 Federal Carbon Charge 4,639,745 7.8300 5,801,162 9.7900 1,161,418 25.0% 0.0% 36 Gas Supply Charges 9,978,236 16.8392 9,978,236 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 37 Total Bill 15,377,201 25.9505 16,539,744 27.9124 1,162,543 7.6% 0.0% 38 Sales Service Impact 1,162,543 7.6% 0.0% 39 Direct Purchase Impact 1,162,543 21.5% 0.1% Average Rate T2 40 Delivery Charges 1,858,591 0.9397 1,862,349 0.9416 3,758 0.2% 0.2% 41 Federal Carbon Charge 15,486,945 7.8300 19,363,626 9.7900 3,876,681 25.0% 0.0% 42 Gas Supply Charges 33,306,228 16.8392 33,306,228 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 43 Total Bill 50,651,765 25.6089 54,532,204 27.5708 3,880,439 7.7% 0.0% 44 Sales Service Impact 3,880,439 7.7% 0.0% 45 Direct Purchase Impact 3,880,439 22.4% 0.2% Large Rate T2 46 Delivery Charges 3,083,695 0.8332 3,090,727 0.8351 7,032 0.2% 0.2% 47 Federal Carbon Charge 28,977,969 7.8300 36,231,713 9.7900 7,253,744 25.0% 0.0% 48 Gas Supply Charges 62,320,027 16.8392 62,320,027 16.8392 - 0.0% 0.0% 49 Total Bill 94,381,691 25.5024 101,642,467 27.4643 7,260,776 7.7% 0.0% 50 Sales Service Impact 7,260,776 7.7% 0.0% 51 Direct Purchase Impact 7,260,776 22.6% 0.2% Large Rate T3 52 Delivery Charges 5,948,814 2.1814 5,956,450 2.1842 7,636 0.1% 53 Gas Supply Charges 45,922,519 16.8392 45,922,519 16.8392 - 0.0% 54 Total Bill 51,871,333 19.0206 51,878,969 19.0234 7,636 0.0% 55 Sales Service Impact 7,636 0.0% 56 Direct Purchase Impact 7,636 0.1% Approved - EB-2021-0219 Proposed - EB-2021-0209 Bill Impact Page 948 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 4 Page 1 of 2 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. Union Rate Zones Summary of 2020 Federal Carbon Deferral and Variance Accounts Federal Carbon Charge Federal Carbon Charge Greenhouse Gas - Customer Variance - Facility Variance Emissions Administration Line Account Account Deferral Account No.Particulars ($000's)179-421 179-420 179-422 Total (a)(b)(c)(d) = (a+b+c) 1 Balance - (730) 838 108 2 Interest - (26) 8 (19) 3 Total (1)- (756) 845 89 Notes: (1)Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 4, page 2. Page 949 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 4 Page 2 of 2 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. Union Rate Zones Summary of Allocation of 2020 Federal Carbon Deferral and Variance Accounts Jan - Dec 2020 Federal Carbon Charge Federal Carbon Charge Greenhouse Gas Total Total - Customer Variance - Facility Variance Emissions Administration Line Volumes 2013 A&G Account Account Deferral Account No.Particulars ($000's)103m3 ($000's)179-421 179-420 (1)179-422 (2)Total (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f) = (c+d+e) Union South In-Franchise 1 Rate M1 3,003,878 80,159 - (60) 427 367 2 Rate M2 1,204,341 7,513 - (24) 40 16 3 Rate M4 621,380 2,801 - (12) 15 3 4 Rate M5 61,817 3,131 - (1) 17 15 5 Rate M7 618,372 787 - (12) 4 (8) 6 Rate M9 88,765 108 - (2) 1 (1) 7 Rate M10 360 25 - (0) 0 0 8 Rate T1 430,312 2,036 - (9) 11 2 9 Rate T2 4,017,975 5,624 - (80) 30 (50) 10 Rate T3 264,209 627 - (5) 3 (2) 11 Total South In-Franchise 10,311,409 102,812 - (206) 548 342 Union North In-Franchise 12 Rate 01 982,736 31,817 - (20) 170 150 13 Rate 10 342,656 2,759 - (7) 15 8 14 Rate 20 778,476 2,373 - (16) 13 (3) 15 Rate 25 92,838 2,089 - (2) 11 9 16 Rate 100 996,605 953 - (20) 5 (15) 17 Total North In-Franchise 3,193,310 39,992 - (64) 213 149 Ex-Franchise 18 Rate M12 19,511,464 14,918 - (389) 79 (309) 19 Rate M13 45,910 0 - (1) 0 (1) 20 Rate M16 341,757 21 - (7) 0 (7) 21 Rate M17 7,685 - - (0) - (0) 22 Rate C1 4,522,884 323 - (90) 2 (88) 23 Excess Utility Storage Space - 597 - - 3 3 24 Total Ex-Franchise 24,429,699 15,859 - (487) 85 (403) 25 Total In-Franchise & Ex-Franchise 37,934,418 158,663 - (756) 845 89 Notes: (1)Allocated in proportion to column (a). (2)Allocated in proportion to column (b). Account BalancesAllocators Page 950 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 5 Page 1 of 2 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. Union Rate Zones Unit Rates for One-Time Adjustment - Delivery 2020 Federal Carbon Deferral and Variance Account Disposition Deferral Balance for Line Rate Disposition Volume Unit Rate No.Particulars Class ($000's) (1)(103m3)(cents/m3) (a)(b)(c) = (a / b)*100 Union North 1 Small Volume General Service 01 150 982,736 0.0153 2 Large Volume General Service 10 8 342,656 0.0023 3 Medium Volume Firm Service 20 (3) 778,476 (0.0004) 4 Large Volume Interruptible 25 9 92,838 0.0100 5 Large Volume High Load Factor 100 (15) 996,605 (0.0015) Union South 6 Small Volume General Service M1 367 3,003,878 0.0122 7 Large Volume General Service M2 16 1,204,341 0.0013 8 Firm Com/Ind Contract M4 3 621,380 0.0004 9 Interruptible Com/Ind Contract M5 15 61,817 0.0250 10 Special Large Volume Contract M7 (8) 618,372 (0.0013) 11 Large Wholesale M9 (1) 88,765 (0.0013) 12 Small Wholesale M10 0 360 0.0355 13 Contract Carriage Service T1 2 430,312 0.0005 14 Contract Carriage Service T2 (50) 4,017,975 (0.0012) 15 Contract Carriage- Wholesale T3 (2) 264,209 (0.0007) 16 Total 492 Notes: (1)Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 4, page 2, column (f). Page 951 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 5 Page 2 of 2 ENBRIDGE GAS INC. Union Rate Zones Ex-Franchise Amounts for Disposition 2020 Federal Carbon Deferral and Variance Account Disposition Deferral Balance for Line Rate Disposition No.Particulars ($000's) (1)Class ($000's) (2) (a) 1 Storage and Transportation M12 (309) 2 Local Production M13 (1) 3 Storage Transportation Service M16 (7) 4 Transportation Service M17 (0) 5 Short-Term Cross Franchise C1 (88) 6 Total Ex-Franchise (406) Notes: (1)Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 4, page 2, column (f). (2)Ex-franchise M12, M13, M16, M17 and C1 customer specific amounts determined using approved deferral account allocation methodologies. Page 952 Filed: 2021-09-29 EB-2021-0209 Exhibit D Tab 2 Schedule 6 Page 1 of 1 Volume Line Annual Unit Rate (1)Total Adjustment October 2021 Bill (2) October 2021 Bill Including Total Adjustment Impact Unit Rate (1)Total Adjustment October 2021 Bill (2) October 2021 Bill Including Total Adjustment Impact No.m3 ¢/m3 $$$%¢/m3 $$$% (a)(b)(c) = (a x b) / 100 (d)(e) = (d + c)(f) = (c / d)(g)(h) = (a x g) / 100 (i)(j) = (I + h)(k) = (h / i) GENERAL SERVICE Union North 1 Small Rate 01 2,200 0.0153 0.34 1,217 1,217 0.0%0.0153 0.34 1,044 1,045 0.0% 2 Small Rate 10 60,000 0.0023 1.38 23,888 23,889 0.0%0.0023 1.38 19,190 19,191 0.0% 3 Large Rate 10 250,000 0.0023 5.74 94,828 94,834 0.0%0.0023 5.74 75,253 75,259 0.0% Union South 4 Small Rate M1 2,200 0.0122 0.27 957 958 0.0%0.0122 0.27 785 785 0.0% 5 Small Rate M2 60,000 0.0013 0.80 19,194 19,195 0.0%0.0013 0.80 14,496 14,497 0.0% 6 Large Rate M2 250,000 0.0013 3.33 76,482 76,485 0.0%0.0013 3.33 56,907 56,910 0.0% CONTRACT SERVICE Union North 7 Small Rate 20 3,000,000 (0.0004)(11)896,309 896,298 0.0%(0.0004)(11)661,409 661,398 0.0% 8 Large Rate 20 15,000,000 (0.0004)(55)4,328,893 4,328,837 0.0%(0.0004)(55)3,154,393 3,154,337 0.0% 9 Average Rate 25 2,275,000 0.0100 227 654,103 654,331 0.0%0.0100 227 475,971 476,198 0.0% 10 Small Rate 100 27,000,000 (0.0015)(401)8,376,251 8,375,850 0.0%(0.0015)(401)6,262,151 6,261,750 0.0% 11 Large Rate 100 240,000,000 (0.0015)(3,562)73,646,421 73,642,859 0.0%(0.0015)(3,562)54,854,421 54,850,859 0.0% Union South 12 Small Rate M4 875,000 0.0004 4 268,696 268,700 0.0%0.0004 4 200,184 200,187 0.0% 13 Large Rate M4 12,000,000 0.0004 49 3,377,785 3,377,834 0.0%0.0004 49 2,438,185 2,438,234 0.0% 14 Small Rate M5 Interruptible 825,000 0.0250 206 238,940 239,146 0.1%0.0250 206 174,342 174,549 0.1% 15 Large Rate M5 Interruptible 6,500,000 0.0250 1,625 1,807,755 1,809,380 0.1%0.0250 1,625 1,298,805 1,300,430 0.1% 16 Small Rate M7 36,000,000 (0.0013)(474)9,691,927 9,691,453 0.0%(0.0013)(474)6,873,127 6,872,653 0.0% 17 Large Rate M7 52,000,000 (0.0013)(684)16,010,699 16,010,015 0.0%(0.0013)(684)11,939,099 11,938,415 0.0% 18 Small Rate M9 6,950,000 (0.0013)(94)1,362,678 1,362,585 0.0% 19 Large Rate M9 20,178,000 (0.0013)(272)3,969,586 3,969,315 0.0% 20 Average Rate M10 94,500 0.0355 34 23,449 23,483 0.1% 21 Small Rate T1 7,537,000 0.0005 40 2,027,264 2,027,303 0.0%0.0005 40 1,437,117 1,437,156 0.0% 22 Average Rate T1 11,565,938 0.0005 61 3,114,933 3,114,994 0.0%0.0005 61 2,209,320 2,209,381 0.0% 23 Large Rate T1 25,624,080 0.0005 135 6,912,312 6,912,447 0.0%0.0005 135 4,905,946 4,906,081 0.0% 24 Small Rate T2 59,256,000 (0.0012)(739)15,377,201 15,376,462 0.0%(0.0012)(739)10,737,456 10,736,717 0.0% 25 Average Rate T2 197,789,850 (0.0012)(2,468)50,651,765 50,649,297 0.0%(0.0012)(2,468)35,164,819 35,162,351 0.0% 26 Large Rate T2 370,089,000 (0.0012)(4,618)94,381,691 94,377,073 0.0%(0.0012)(4,618)65,403,722 65,399,104 0.0% 27 Large Rate T3 272,712,000 (0.0007)(1,990)51,871,333 51,869,343 0.0% Notes: (1)Unit rates calculated at Exhibit D, Tab 2, Schedule 5. (2)Typical annual bill for a sales service customer at approved October 2021 QRAM rates (EB-2021-0219). Annual Bill Impact for Non-OBPS Annual Bill Impact for OBPS ENBRIDGE GAS INC. Union Rate Zones Typical Bill Impacts 2020 Federal Carbon Deferral and Variance Account Disposition Page 953