HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-04-20Clarington Heritage Committee
bgton
Minutes
April 20, 2021
If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility
Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131
Minutes of the Clarington Heritage Committee held via Microsoft Teams on April 20,
2021, at 7:00 PM.
Members Present were: Peter Vogel, Victor Suppan, David Reesor, Ron Sproule,
Noel Gamble, Steve Conway, Councillor Ron Hooper, Myno
Van Dyke (NVDHS), Jason Moore (ACO), Bob Malone
(NVDHS)
Regrets: Katharine Warren (Museum)
Staff Present: Faye Langmaid, Sarah Allin, Planning and Development
Services; Stephen Brake, Public Works
Guests: Bill Humber (Beech Ave. Heritage Conservation District
Advisory Committee), Rick McEachern
1 Declaration of Interest
There were no disclosures of interest stated at this meeting.
2 Land Acknowledgement Statement
P. Vogel read aloud Clarington's Land Acknowledgement Statement.
3 Adoption of Agenda
21.16 By Consensus
That the Agenda be adopted
"Carried"
4 Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting
21.17 By Consensus
That the minutes of the April 20, 2021 Clarington Heritage Committee
meeting be adopted.
"Carried"
5 Delegations/Presentations: None
6 Business Arising
6.1 Red Oak Tree at 21 Beech Avenue
Staff provided a brief recap of the Committee's consideration of this matter at its
March 16 meeting. Specifically, in response to the receipt of requests to
individually designate the tree under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, the
Committee received (i) delegations on this matter (ii) information regarding arborist
reports and the health of the tree provided by Public Works staff, and (iii) an
overview of the current status of the tree as a significant landscape feature within
- 1 -
Clar;wgtoa
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
April 20, 2021
the existing Beech Avenue Heritage Conservation District (HCD) designated under
Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act.
In response discussions at the March 16 CHC meeting, S. Brake, Director of
Public Works, advised the Committee of the following:
• Staff has implemented parking restrictions and a `No Stopping Zone' on
Beech Avenue in the vicinity of the subject red oak tree in order to minimize
risk of vehicles occupying the space underneath the tree limb that extends
over the road;
• The Municipality's insurance company provided information that
recommends actions be taken to minimize any identified hazards posed by
the tree;
• Additional information provided by the arborist estimates the tree to be
approximately 230 years old, noting with proper care the tree could live
another 50 years; and
• A preliminary plan for mitigation and support for the tree as provided by the
arborist would include pruning, 4 may poles, and a series of cables, with an
estimated cost of approximately $55,000.
In response to a request from residents of the community, the Evaluation sub-
committee of the CHC undertook research and an evaluation of the tree to inform
its recommendation as to whether the tree possesses sufficient cultural heritage
value or interest to merit individual designation under Part IV of the OHA.
The sub -committee evaluation and advice based on extensive research and the
information provided to the Committee, found insufficient cultural heritage
significance to recommend support for individual designation of the tree under Part
IV, as requested at the previous meeting.
Committee members discussed the history of the tree, the potential options to
support the branches, and the importance of the red oak tree to the community
and the Old Bowmanville neighbourhood. The red oak tree at 21 Beech Avenue
remains protected as a significant landscape feature in the Beech Avenue
Heritage Conservation District, designated under Part V of the OHA. The
Committee looks forward to the efforts of the Municipality to preserve and extend
the life of the red oak tree in the Beech Avenue Heritage Conservation District.
Committee members support the Municipality's preliminary plans and efforts not to
remove the tree at this time, and recognize it is not the Committee's mandate to
determine the Municipality's course of action but to assess the heritage impact of
such actions, including but not limited to how the streetscape and canopy
coverage over Beech Avenue may be affected.
In this context and in its role as an advisory committee on matters of cultural
heritage, Committee members requested an opportunity to comment on any
Municipal course of action related to this recognized landscape feature of the
Beech Avenue Heritage Conservation District.
-2-
Clar;wgtoa
6.2 Heritage Trees
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
April 20, 2021
The preservation of heritage trees has been a topic considered by the Committee
for the last number of years. In consideration of the Committee's mandate to
maintain an updated list of cultural heritage resources in the Municipality,
Committee members discussed establishing a list of heritage trees in order to
track these resources and inform any future Municipal tree -related by-laws. During
the Committee's evaluation of the Fletcher Tree, a tree protection by-law was
identified as a tool to establish minimum standards for the ongoing maintenance
and long-term care of living cultural heritage resources on public and private lands,
as well as how to deal with their decline.
21.18 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by M. Van Dyke
That the Heritage Committee (i) establishes a Heritage Tree List consisting of
trees with potential cultural heritage value in and interest (ii) that trees on the list
be mapped by the Municipality, and (iii) that the following five trees be added to
the list in the `Candidate' category:
• Burl Oak Tree located at 4 Liberty Place, Bowmanville;
• Royal Oak Tree located at 57 George Street, Newcastle;
• Royal Oak Tree located at 160 Morgan Road, Newcastle;
• Beech Tree associated with Carrying Place, located on Park Lane in
Newcastle; and
• Tree located at 6320 Scugog Road.
"Carried"
6.3 Fletcher Tree
No update for this standing agenda item.
6.4 Veterans Avenue Housing; 27 Second Street
Sub -committee members presented additional research gathered on the building at 27
Second Street, advising the building had been part of the commissary at Camp 30, and
was moved in whole from the Camp 30 property. The Committee had recently passed a
motion to add the property to the Cultural Heritage Resources List in the Heritage Merit
category. Given the additional information, the sub -committee recommends revising the
category to Secondary.
21.19 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by R. Sproule
That the status of the property at 27 Second Street on the Cultural Heritage
Resources List be changed from the `Heritage Merit' category to `Secondary'.
"Carried"
6.5 62 King Street W., Bowmanville; Consideration of Uncovered Architectural Feature
Exterior structural pillars that are original to the building at 62 King Street W. were
recently uncovered during a renovation project. The Committee is pleased the pillars
-3-
Clarftwn
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
April 20, 2021
were conserved through the renovation, as they are a structural component of the
building, and are now a prominent architectural feature of the front fagade of the
building. It was discussed that there are other locations in downtown Bowmanville that
have similar pillars to those discovered at 62 King St. W. Committee members
discussed the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act that provide for the modification of
the designation by-law to add or remove listed significant heritage attributes. The
subject property was designated in 1998, and the designation by-law has not yet been
updated to align with the criteria established under O. Regulation 9/06. Committee
members would like to see the designation by-law updated to better reflect the O. Reg.
9/06 criteria and to document the commercial/merchant history of the building.
21.20 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by R. Sproule
That staff be directed to initiate the process to update the designation by-law for
62 King Street W., Bowmanville to better align with O. Regulation 9/06 to ensure
the by-law accurately reflects the property's cultural heritage value or interest,
and better informs current and future property owners.
"Carried"
6.6 Update on Former Goodyear Property
The landowner continues to work on a Heritage Impact Assessment and undertake
efforts to secure the site.
6.7 Update on 81 Scugog Street
Staff has sent two letters to the property owner since January 2021 regarding the
Heritage Incentive Grant Program that is available to assist with the cost of the upkeep
and maintenance of the designated heritage features that have fallen into disrepair. To
date, no response has been received. Committee members discussed next steps
available to prevent further deterioration of the designated property, and asked staff to
reach out again to the property owners with a letter outlining the requirements of the
designation and property standards by-laws to maintain designated heritage buildings,
and a response be provided by an appropriate date.
6.8 Belmont Property (302 Given Road) Re: Grist Mill
V. Suppan provided information relating to correspondence with the property owners'
representatives in relation to the Wilmot Creek Heritage Park, and specifically where the
Grist Mill might have been located. The Newcastle Village District Historical Society
provided a watercolour illustrating the grist mill that will be shared with the members of
the Committee for information. Committee members appreciate the opportunity to
continue to be involved in the planning of the Wilmot Creek Heritage Park.
7 Correspondence and Council Referrals: None
8 Reports from other Committees
8.1 Bowmanville, Newcastle, and Orono CIPs — The CIP Liaison Groups met in
February. Summaries of the meetings items were provided including updates
regarding the Community Improvement Plan Grant Programs, seasonal patio
programs, and public art initiatives.
Clarftwn
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
April 20, 2021
8.2 Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO), Clarington Branch — The next ACO
meeting is scheduled for June. No update regarding Doors Open for this year, as
it is difficult to plan with the current COVID-19 restrictions.
8.3 Newcastle Village District Historical Society (NVDHS) — Digitization project
continues to progress remotely as the room is still closed. Fundraising
opportunities are being explored. Committee members welcomed back Mr.
Malone to the Heritage Committee meetings.
8.4 Museum — A Library Board has not met since the last Heritage Committee
meeting. The Museum remains closed to the public.
8.5 Heritage Conservation District Advisory Committee — See Item 6.1, above.
8.6 Wilmot Creek Heritage Park — See Item 6.8, above.
9 Project Reports
9.1 The sub -committee evaluated the following properties and recommended as
follows:
• Red Oak Tree in front of 21 Beech Avenue: In consideration of the protection
afforded to the tree as a significant landscaping feature within the Beech
Avenue Conservation District designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage
Act, and the evaluation of the tree as an individual cultural heritage resource,
that individual designation of the tree under Part IV not be pursued at this
time. See Item 6.1 above for additional details. Staff will notify those who
made the designation request of the Committee's recommendation.
21.21 Moved by V. Suppan, seconded by D. Reesor
That the Heritage Committee recommends to Council that Part IV designation of
the Red Oak Tree located in front of 21 Beech Avenue, identified as a significant
landscaping feature of the Beech Avenue Heritage Conservation District, not be
pursued at this time.
"Carried"
• 62 King Street West.: See Item 6.5 and Motion 20.20 recommending an update
to the designation by-law for the property.
9.2 Outreach/Education Sub -committee:
Cultural Heritage Information Pole Project: Staff has drafted information and
potential sites for the first phase of the project. The information will be circulated to
sub -committee members for review for discussion at the May Committee meeting.
16'2
Clar;wgtoa
New Business
Clarington Heritage Committee
Minutes
April 20, 2021
9.3 Proposed OPA/ZBA at 40 Station Street, Orono: Staff provided an overview of the
proposed applications made to facilitate a future land division of a surplus farm
dwelling as they affect the designated property at 40 Station Street. Committee
members discussed the proposed applications and generally expressed no
objections to the severing of the surplus farm dwelling to provide better opportunity
for the home to remain properly maintained. Discussion and comment included:
• Confirmation the heritage designation would continue to apply to the dwelling,
should the subject applications and future land division request be approved. It
was noted however, that the legal description contained in the existing
designation by-law may need to be updated to reflect the extent of the severed
lands in the future.
• Members inquired about the size and configuration of the proposed surplus farm
lot and the location of the driveway accessing the designated dwelling as it
relates to the contextual value of the dwelling being located at the high point of
the property.
• Committee members discussed the intent to review and update to the
designation by-law to align with the current format prescribed by O. Reg. 9/06,
and to better reflect the contextual value of the property.
It was noted the statutory Public Meeting for the subject Official Plan Amendment
and Zoning By-law Amendment applications is scheduled for the Planning and
Development Committee meeting on April 26th at 7:OOp.m. Committee comments
will be provided to the Planner processing the application.
9.4 Land Registry Microfiche Files — Staff has been corresponding with the Land
Registry Office to inquire about the possible acquisition of Clarington microfiche
records. Updates will be provided as they become available on this initiative, and
this item will be added to the next agenda.
9.5 Title Search Training — Committee members expressed appreciation for the Title
Search Training Session provided recently by heritage consultant ARA. The
session was well attended by Clarington Heritage Committee members as well as
heritage committee members and staff from other Durham local municipalities, and
was very helpful and applicable to the research undertaken by Committee
members.
Adjournment: 9:10 p.m.
Next Meeting: May 18, 2021, 7:00 p.m.