HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/17/1966Page 2 -
Meeting of Committee of Adjustment, November 5, 1965 -
The Secretary reported that 27 notices of the said hearing
had been mailed in accordance with item 4 of the Rules of Pro-
cedure.
Mr. IV. Gordon Cotter appeared in support of this application
and explained the separation as presented on the survey. Mr. A.
M. Johnston, a property owner within 200t of the applicant's
property, also appeared. Mr. Johnston did not oppose the appli-
cation. No other person appeared in support of, or in opposition
to this application.
Municipal water is available and connected to the property
upon which severance is being requested.
Upon hearing the presentation of Mr. Cotter, the applicant,
and upon perusal of the material filed, the Committee were of
the unanimous opinion that consent should be granted. It was
so moved by K. Schoenmaker, seconded by H. E. Walkey. Carried.
The Secretary -Treasurer was authorized to service the
said application under Subsection (2x)(10) and (11) of Section
326 of the Planning Act and amendments thereto.
Meeting adjourned at 10.35 p.m:
Secretary -Treasurer Chairman
1=IIFG
of. the
00111ITTEE OF 4DJUo_I. 717T
of the
To.,, 3iiIP OF C7 -2 p
'--onday, January 17, 1966; at 8 p.m.
CouAcil Chamber, Orono.
Present: E.R.Lovekin, Chairman
'_.L.',aalkey, iic!:rber
K.Schoenraaker, :;`ember
H".E.1,1illson, Secretary,*-Treas„rer
The minutes of meetinS dated November 5, 1965, were approved
as read on motion by i . �.':7alkey, seconded by K. Schoenmaker. -
Carried.
Application iTo. 5-65 was tabled for further consideration
at a future meetin_ of this Coimiittee when a plan of survey
by an O.L.S. has heen subi-, tted.,
The following applications were considered by the Committee:
Application File No. 9-66 X. Kay Lycett, .gent
firs. Bertha Touchbu.rn, Owner,
Orono, Ontario
for Lot 291, Con. 5•, in the
Police Village of Orono of
- the Town. -s -hip of C1ark.e
Submission Po. "B" 9-66-5
Application i,.as made for exemption or partial exemption
from provisions of Sub -Division Contro•1 By -Law No. 1306, so as
to permit the separation of a parcel of land bein<; approximately
120? x 1651 being 0.45 acres from the app-licant?s land.
The Secretary reported that 20 notices of the said hearing
had been mailed in accordance with item 4 of the Pules orf
Procedure.'
1?rs. Bertha Touchburn appeared in support of this appli-
cation and explained the separation as one lot as presented \
in the description in the indenture and not as two lots shown
in the plan of survey by LwD.Brown, O.L.S.; No other person
appearedtin. support of, or in opposition to this application.
lj nicipal water is available and connected to the -pro-
perty upon which. severance is being requested.
Page 2 -
ieetin; of Committee of Adjustment, January 17, 1966:
Upon hearing the presentation of Lits. Touchburn, the
applicant, and upon perusal of the material filed, the
Committee were of the unanimous opinion that consent should
be granters. It was so moved by H.N.4'alkey, seconded by
K. Schoenmaker. - Carried.
The Secretary -Treasurer gas authorized to service the
-said appliontion under Subsection (2a)(10) and (11) of
Section 326 of The Planning Act and amendments thereto.
Application File No. 10-66 Ronald Shoobridge, Owner
1338 Simcoe St: S., Oshawa, Ont.
for part Lot 34, Cori. 1,
Township of Clarke.
Submission No.
Application Was -made for exemption or- partial exemption
from provisions of Sub -Division Control By -Law I;o. 1404, so as
to permit the separation. of a parcel o' land being approxi-
Taately 1001 - 150T being 15,000 s�tuare feet from the appli-
cantls land..
The Secretary rerorted that 11 notices of the said hearing
had been mailed in accordance with item 4 of the Rules of
Procedure.
Lr. Ronald Shoobridge appeared in support of this appli-
cation and explained the separation as presented on the survey.
I,Irs. Ronald Shoobridge also appeared. Idsi Chas. Gilkes, a
property owner ;d thin 2001 of the applicEu-itTs property, also
appeared. l.ir. Gilkes did not oppose the application. No other
person appeared in support of, or inoppositior. to this aopli-
ca.tion.
Yr. Shoobridge stated it had originally been his intention
to b,zild one house on the lands purchased from Er. Gilkes. Due
to a ,recent back ailment and loss of work and finances, he said,
it was now his intention to amply to this Committee for a
separ_,tion in order to build a second house for resale on the
subject land. This wo,_ild, he remarked, eive him an opportunity
y«r.
to re-establish his financial position, Gilkes then
proposed the following ryuestion: "If the Colmnittee consent to
this separation, then ,vould they also consent to a separation
on my ycoperty abutting the subject land?"
The Secretary t,,as asked to secure a copy= of the D.=a.O.
building permit from i_ Shoobrid;;e to ascertain the arproved
set back .of •the proposed residential building on the subject
lard.
The. Committee asked i,:r. 3hoobridLre if the depth could be
increased on the subject land to include the small rocket of
land southerly of the subject- land. ilr. Shoobridge answered
in the affirmative as his applic;;
page
3-
t1eeting of Cormn�ttee of Adjustment, January 17, 1966:
It was pointed out that Lir. Teertstra had legally contrac-
ted to convert (letter of L.C.1.:ason dated Nov. 17/65 pef.) the
property before the passing of the by-law but, unfortunately,
due to an oversight the deed had not been registered. The
subject land haat been for sale for approximately 9 months be�'ore
the passing of the by-law.
Upon hearing the presentation of 11r. Teertstra, the aprli-
cant, and upon perusal of the material filed, the Committee were
of the unanimous opinion that consent should be granted. It
was so moved by,t.E.aalkey, seconded by K. Schoenmaker. - Carried.
The Secretary -Treasurer was authorized to service the said
application under Subsection (2a)(10) and (11) of Section 326
of The PlanninL^ Act and amendments thereto.
Application File i-0.'12-66 Mr. & LIrs. H. E. ISillscn,
Owner, Orono, Ontario,
for part Lots 12-13, Blocl E
in the Police Villae of
Orono in Lot 231 Con.,S,
of the Tozmship of Clarke
Submission Ivo. "B'? 12-66-7
Application was made for exemption or partial ezee•,pti_on
from provisions of Sub -Division Control B-- Lavv 20. 130 , so
as to permit the separation of a parcel of land beim approxi-
mately 53.52? x 104?; 15,QCO square feet, from the applicurr'ts?
land. `
The Secretary reported that 29 notices of tide said hearing
had been nailed in accordance with item 4 of the Rules of
Procedure.
1r. H. H. 3illson appeared in support of t'iis application
and explr_ined the separation as presented in the survey. Iio
other icerson'appeared. in sirojort of, or in opposition to this
aimlication.
Upon hearing; the presentation of lr. 1.illson, the appli-
cant, and upon perusal of the material filed, the ,Committee
here of the unanimous orinion that consent should be granted.
It was moved b•> K. 'Schoenmaker,, seconded bi, 1=. E.alkey. -
Carried.
The Secretar.;r-Treasurer was authorized to service the
said application under Subsection (2a)(10) anal (11) of Section
326 'of -,, `1a, ling Act and amendments thareto.
It v:,as moved by K. Schoer_maker, seconded E. 'v'alkey,
that the Secretary -Treasurer request the Ccunc'_ ;rovide an
ar.�2aropriation for this Co=iittee in the
the Year 1966. - Carried. �
Leetins adjourned at 12:10 a.m.
oecretary-Treasurer - - - —
MEETING
of the
COT1MITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
of the
TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE
Monday, April 11, 1966 at 8 p.m.
Council Chamber, Orono.
Present: E.R.Lovekin, Chairman
H.E.Walkey, Member
K. Schoenmaker, Member
H.E.Millson, Secretary -Treasurer.
The minutes of meeting, dated January 17, 1966, were
approved as read, on motion by H.E.Walkey, seconded by K. Schoen -
maker. - Carried.
.Application No. 5-65 was again tabled for further`considera-
tion at a future meeting of this committee when a plan of survey
by an O.L.S. has been submitted. It was moved by H.E.Walkey,
seconded by K. Schoenmaker, that Solicitor W.Kay Lycett be
requested to submit further details in respect to said Applica-
tion No. 5-65, or otherwise the said application will be filed