HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/24/1969MEETING
of the
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
Monday, November 24, 1969
Present: E.R. Lovekin,
K. Schoenmaker,
E.F.R. Osborne,
Mrs. Ellen M. Yeo,
Horace R. Best,
Arthur Low,
M.D. Brown
at 7:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Chairman,
Member,
Member,
Secretary -Treasurer,
Zoning Administrator,
Secretary, Planning Board
Ontario Land Surveyor, 1106
The minutes of meeting October 27, 1969 were approved as read
on motion by K. Schoenmaker and seconded by E.F.R. Osborne. Carried.
The Secretary -Treasurer presented the following material to the
meeting:
(1) Correspondence from Ontario I-Iunicipal Board,
145 Queen Street W., Toronto, dated November 18,
1969 with duplicate original of the Order of the
Board attached, in connection with an appeal by
George Lumley against a decision of the Committee
of :adjustment, Application No. 173-69. The dommittee
noted the contents thereof and this matter was filed.
(2) Correspondence from The Ontario Municipal Board,
145 Queen Street W., TorojR&pt dated November 21,
1969 with attached appoint for hearing regarding
Sunnydene Estates Limited, Sub. ?:os. B141-68-130
& B142-68-131, said hearing to be on Tuesday, the
9th day of December, 1969, at the hour of eleven
o'clock in the forenoon. The Committee noted the
contents thereof and instructed the Secretary to
keep these files with the current files until this
matter has been finalized.
Application File No. 210-69
Application File No. 211-69
Edward R. Woodyard, Agent,
Orono, Ontario,
Miss Helena J. Waddell, Owners,
Miss Catherine A. "suaddell,
Orono, Ontario,
for part of Lot 29, Con V,
Police Village of Orono,
Township.of Clarke,
Submission No. "B" 210-69-190
Submission No. "B" 211-69-191
As business arising from minutes of past meetings, these
applications were presented for further consideration.
Mr. Edward R. Woodyard, agent for the applicants appeared in
support of this application. Mr. Horace R. Best, Zoning :administrator
and Mr. Arthur Low, Secretary, Planning Board appeared as observers.
No other person appeared in support of, or in opposition to this
application.
Mr. Woodyard as agent for the applicants presented the following
material to the meeting:
(1) A Plan of Survey prepared by M.D. Brown OLS, 1106,
Bowmanville, Ontario, dated November 20, 1969 and
numbered 69169 with legal description attached;
Page 2
Meeting Committee of Adjustment November 24, 1969;
(2) A photostat copy of Resolution No. 69-72 from
the Trustees of the Police Village of Orono,
as follows:
"Moved by E. Woodyard,
Seconded by Floyd Nicholson
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that we, the Trustees
of the Police Village of Orono make application
to Ontario Water Resources for a permit to
extend water mains west approximately 300`feet
on the Fifth Line from Main Street. Carried: D. Simpson"
The Committee:
(1) Referred to minutes of meetings September 13, October 1,
October 27, 1969;
(2) Recalled their inspection of the property on Friday
September 26, 1969;;
(3) Perused the Plan of Survey presented;
(4) Recalled that at their meeting of October 1,
1969 they indicated "there will be no buildings
erected until after the present road is widened
and made safer for traffic";
(5) The Committee informed Mr. Woodyard that they would
instruct the Building Inspector for the Township
of Clarke, Mr. Horace Best, that by agreement and
with consent no building permit was to be issued
on.this property until Mr. Merrill Ross, Road
Superintendent of the Township of Clarke had assured
the Building Inspector that the roads were satisfactory
in his opinion;
(6) The Committee require as a condition to this consent
to sever that any deeds prepared for the conveyance
of these lands must include the acknowledgement that
the applicants are aware that building permits will
not issue until the road is'improved, unless prior
to such deeds being presented for approval a written
statement is filed with the Committee from the Road
Superintendent of the Township of Clarke stating that
the road has been improved to a condition acceptable
to him as concerns vision, grade, width and surfacing.
These applicationsgranted on motion by K. Schoenmaker, seconded
by E.F.R. Osborne. Carried. CL,;SSIFICi.TION "A"
Application File No. 223-69
W. Kay Lycett B.A., agent,
Barrister & Solicitor,
Orono, Ontario,
Gordon Sturrock, Owners,
Howard Sturrock,
210 Scugog, Bowmanville, Ont.,
60 Prospect Street,
Bowmanville, Ontario.
for part of Lots 3,4,5,
Block "T", Police Village
of Orono, Lot 28, Con V.
Township of Clarke,
Submission No. "A" 223-69-8
Application was made for exemption or partial exemption from
provisions of Subdivision Control By -Law 1592, with amendments
thereto so as to permit a minor variance of the required frontage
for a building lot from 751 to 60.4' with a depth of 132' and having
an area of approximately 8157.1 square feet.
The Secretary reported that 22 notices of the said hearing had
been mailed in accordance with Item 4 of The Rules of Procedure.
Mr. Howard Sturrock, one of the applicants, accompanied by
his agent W. Kay Lycett B.A., Barrister & Solicitor, Orono, Ontario
appeared in support of this application. Mr. Horace R. Best, Zoning
Administrator and Mr. Arthur Low, Secretary, clannirig'Board appeared
as observers. No other person appeared in sup,_,ort of, or in
opposition to this application.
Page 3
Meeting Committee of Adjustment November 24, 1969;
The Secretary -Treasurer presented the following material to
the meeting:
(1) Correspondence from W. Kay Lycett B.A., Barrister
& Solicitor, Orono, Ontario, dated November 5, 1969,
The Committee noted the contents thereof;
(2) A photostat copy of a sketch of survey as per a
registered Hanning Plan of Orono, with description
of the subject land attached; said survey dated
December, 1955;
The Committee referred to the minutes of meeting October 27,
1969 at which time a severance was granted to the former owners
of this property (ref. File No. 216-69 Charles Vertal Wilson
and Hattie May Wilson) and particularly noted the following:
(1) This is an application by the proposed purchasers
for a minor variance of the required frontage of
75' under the present zoning by-law 1653, amending
by-law to 1592,to that of 60.4 feet in respect of
the same lot;
(2) The area is larger by approximately 657 square feet
than the minimum required area of 7500 square feet;
(3) The subject land backs on'a school yard which has
a larger open area;
(4) To the east of the subject land is a flood plain
which also has a large area and will probably remain
as greenbelt or open space in a future plan;
(5) The applicant stated that the house he proposes to
build will have the required sideyard clearances;
In regard to the definition of what constitutes a minor variance
the Committee, referred to a Decision in The Municipal World,
April 1969, "John Pfeffer and the Committee of .adjustment of
the Borough of North York, O.E.B. P7673-68 19th February, 1969 -
"If you define a minor variance mathematically you
must inevitably reach the same conclusion as the
Committee of :adjustment that this is a major and not
a minor variance.
"In the Board's view however there is a good deal to be
said in a case such as the present to look at the overall
picture and consider'whether, if the variance is granted'
the general intent and purpose of the by-law would be
maintained."
Based on the above facts this application was granted on motion
by K. Schoenmaker. Seconded by E.F.R. Osborne. Carried.
CLASSIFICATION "P"
Application File No. 222-69
W. Kay Lycett B.A., Agent,
Barrister & Solicitor,
Orono, Ontario,
Harry A. Kuehn, Owners,
Christa H. Kuehn,
R.R. #1 Newtonville, Ontario,
for part of Lot 6, Con 11,
Township of Clarke,
Submission No."B" 222-69-196
Application was made for exemption or partial exemption from
provisions of sub -division control by-law No. 1592 and amendments
thereto, so as to permit the separation`of 660'x29640' being
approximately 40 acres in area from the applicants' land.
The Secretary reported that 22 notices of the said hearing had
been mailed in accordance with Item 4 0£ The Rules of Procedure.
Mr. Harry A. Kuehn the applicant accompanied by his agent
bJ. Kay Lycett B.A., Barri'ster,& Solicitor, Orono, Ontario, appeared
in support of this application. Mr. Horace R. Best, Zoning Administrator
and Mr. Arthur Low, Secretary, Planning Board, appeared as observers.
No other person appeared in support of,' or in opposition to this
appli'ca'tion.
Page 4
Meeting Committee of Adjustment November 24, 1969;
The Secretary -Treasurer presented the following material to
the meeting:
(1) Correspondence from W. Kay Lycett-B.A., Barrister
& Solicitor, Orono, Ontario, dated October 28, 1969.
The Committee noted the contents thereof;
I=Ir. Lycett on behalf o£ -the applicant made the following submissions:
(1) Mr. and Mrs. Kuehn own approximately 100 acres of
farm property and wish to sever 40 acres from the
100 acre parcel;
(2) The most northerly 24 acres, more or less, is bush
land and of no particular agricultural use to them;
(3) The new amending By-law 1653 provides for a minimum
area of 40 acres in respect of agricultural holdings
and Mr. and Mrs. Kuehn are applying for the severance
of the 40 acres rather than the 24 acres which is
actually the property they wish to dispose of;
(4) Mr. and I,Irs. Kuehn purchased this property approximately
21 years ago. They conduct a small• farming operation by
raising rabbits and laying hens and gross approximately
$5,000.00 annually;
The Committee considered the facts presented and this application was
adjourned to enable the Committee to visit the property.
CLASSIrICATION "E"
Application File No. 224-69
Application File No. 225-69
-W. Kay Lycett B.A., Agent,
Barrister & Solicitor,
Orono, Ontario,
William John Lorenzo Bowins
Jennie Lily Bowins, Owners,
Orono, Ontario.
for part of Lot 3 &
whole of Lots 1 & 2 Block I,
Police Village of Orono,
Lot 29, Concession V,
Township of Clarke,
Submission No. "B" 224 -69 -
Submission No. "A" 225 -69 -
Application was made for exemption or partial exemption from
provisions of sub -division control by-law No. 1592 and amendments
thereto,,so as to permit the separation of 65' x 157.80' being
approximately 10257 square feet in area from the applicants' land.
The Secretary reported that 18 notices of the said hearing had
been mailed in accordance with Item 4 of The Rules of Procedure.
Application was made for exemption or partial exemption from
provisions of Subdivision Control By -Law 1592, with amendments
thereto so as to permit a minor variance of the required frontage
for a building lot from 75' to 65' with a depth of 157.80' and
having an area of 1.0257 square feet.
The Secretary reported that 18 notices of the said hearing had
been mailed in accordance with Item 4 of The Rules of Procedure.
The `Secretary -Treasurer presented the following material to
the meeting:
(1) Correspondence from W. Kay Lycett B.A., Barrister
and Solicitor, Orono, Ontario, dated November 6,1969.
The Committee noted the contents thereof;
(2) A photostat copy of a Plan of Survey prepared by
M.D. Brown, Ontario Land Surveyor, Bowmanville, Ontario,
dated November 28, 1966 and numbered 66139;
Page 5
Meeting Committee of P.djustment November 24, 1969;
The Committee noted that two applications had been submitted by
Mr. Bowins: (1) Application "B" 224-69 for a severance;
(2) Application "A" 225-69 for a minor variance
on the proposed severance.
The Committee, with the approval of the Agent for the Applicants
stated that they would apply the evidence submitted with the
first application to the second application.
Mr. William J.L. Bowins, the applicant accompanied by his
agent W. Kay Lycett B.A., Barrister & Solicitor, appeared in
support of these applications. Mr. Horace R. Best, Zoning
Administrator and Mr. Arthur Low, Secretary, Planning Board,
appeared as observers. No other person appeared in support of,
or in opposition to this application.
Mr. W. Kay Lycett B.A., made the following submissions:
(1) Mr. and Pars. Bowins own all the land in lots 1 & 2
and part of 3 as shown on the Hanning Plan,
Village of Orono.
(2) Mr. Bowins has erected a house at the south east
corner of lot 2 as shown on the Plan of Survey.
(3) Implication "B" 224-69 is an application for a severance
of the more westerly lot outlined in red on the plan
of survey;
(4) Application "A" 225-69 is an application for a minor
variance on the more westerly lot outlined in red
on the plan of survey;
(5) The right-of-way east and west, shown on the plan of
survey has been replaced by the north - south right
of way, also shown on the plan of survey, said north -
south right-of-way gives access to the septic tank
on neighboring land for clean out purposes.
Mr. Bowins stated that he had purchased the property early in
19667 and according to the existing by-law at that time was
approved by the Department of Health for tile beds. There are
also three water main connections to the properties.
The Committee considered the facts presented and this application
was adjourned to enable the Committee to visit the property.
CLASSIFICr:TION "A"
CLASSIFICATIUN "P"
The following applications were also presented for
consideration:.
Application File 212-69
Application File 215-69
Application File 219-69
Application File 226-69
Milton Staples
Delbert J. Hallowell
Sam Buma
John Bouwmeester
The Committee not having completed this work by 12:30 a.m.,
the meeting was adjourned until later in the day to re -assemble
at 6:30 p.m.
The meeting of the Committee of .adjustment re -convened at
6:30 p.m. on November 25, 1969 in the Council Chamber with the
following members present:
E.R. Lovekin Chairman,
K.`Schoenmaker Member,
E.F.R. Osborne Member,
Mrs. Ellen M. Yeo Secretary -Treasurer
Page 6
Meeting Committee of adjustment November 24, 1969;
Application File Ido. 212-69 W. Kay Lycett B.A., Agent,
Barrister & Solicitor,
Orono, Ontario,
Milton W. Staples, Owner,
R.R. 42, Orono, Ontario,
for part of Lot 29, Con V,
Police Village of Orono,
and Township of Clarke,
Submissicn No. "B" 212-69-192
As business arising from minutes of past meetings this
application was brought forward for further consideration.
W. Kay Lycett B.A., Barrister & Solicitor, Orono, Ontario,
as agent for the applicant and Nr. Jan Ochonski the proposed
purchaser appeared in support of this application. The following
persons also appeared: Hr. Horace R. Best, an abutting owner,
I•Ir. Arthur Low, Secretary, Planning Board,
Mr. Merrill Brown, Ontario Land Surveyor,
No other person appeared in support of, or in opposition to this
application.
The Committee, in this case, have heard hours of argument
concerning this application.
The adjoining land owner, Mr. Horace Best pointed out
that a water course from his land flowed through lots shown
on the Plan dated December 23, 1966;
Mr. Best further stated that the existing water course
crossed a building lot 44 as shown on a Plan of Survey #66148 "All
prepared by I-I.D. Brown OLS, Bowmanville, Ontario, and this was
in contravention of section 3.8 of amending by-law 1653. He
also referred to by-law #1639 of the Township of Clarke being
a by-law for prohibiting the obstruction of any drain or water
course within the Townshi; of Clarke.
Mr. Arthur Low, Secretary, Planning Board verified that
Plan 66148A had been approved by the local Planning Board and
also by the Department of Municipal Affairs, but would be subject
to review when the subdivision"agreement was signed.
Mr. Brown confirmed on Plan 66148A the existence of the water
course as shown on a previous survey #66148;
The Committee were concerned lest they grant a severance which
would be clearly at variance with a sensible overall scheme for
the area.
After a lengthy discussion the Committee referred to the
minutes of meetings: September 131 October 12 October 82 October
27, 1969; recalled their inspection of the property on September
262 1969; perused 5 Plans of Surveys (ref, minutes October 27,1969)
and concluded thatthere was no valid reason to refuse the severance
and planning requirements in the area were assisted by the provision
of an East-West axis road.
Application granted on motion by K. Schoenmaker. Seconded by
E.F.,t.,Osborne. Carried.
e
CLASSIFIZ,D "H"
Application File No. 215-69 Delbert J. Hallowell, Owner,
26a Triller Avenue,
Toronto, Ontario,
for part of Lot 9, Con 1V,
Township of Clarke,
Submission No. "B" 215-69-193
former
As business arising from minutes of/meetings this application
was brought forward for further consideration.
Page 7
Meeting Committee of Adjustment November 24, 1969;
Mr. Delbert J. Hallowell, the applicant, -accompanied by his
son-in-law Mr. James Redford, 2117 6lestfield Dr., Mississauga,
Ontario, the,proposed,purchaser appeared in support of this
application. No other person appeared in support of, or in opposition
to this application. Mr. Horace R. Best, Zoning Administrator and
Mr. Arthur Low, Secretary, Planning Board, appeared as observers.
The applicant purchased approximately 35 acres of land
about 17 years ago and has spent this time in working the land
and bringing it up to a high state of cultivation in his spare
time, commuting to the property from his urban home.
As indicated in the Plan of Survey submitted to the Committee,
a small frame dwelling existed on the premises for purposes of
his accommodation during the summer holidays and week -end visits.
He obtained a building permit on August 3, 1967, #5767 and con-
structed a modern 2 bedroom house on the premises. As he is con-
structing this mainly himself it is not yet completed but is ob-
viously a building of quite satisfactory standards. This means that
he will have on the property two existing dwellings; one of an
acceptable standard and the one of a sub -standard type of con-
struction.
If the application herein was phrased'in such a manner as to
include one dwelling house on a separate parcel of land, special
consideration might be given to such an application in view of the
fact that the number of housing units on the land would not be increased
or decreased by such a severance. The application proposed is not
so cast and the location of the buildings probably makes this
impossible. °
The applicant obviously is not presently a bona fide farmer with-
in the meaning of By-law 1592 as amended by By-law 1653 in that his
major source of income is not derived from farming.
The Committee can see no justification in granting the application
in its present form as a completely separate lot on which no building
exists would be created and since the land is in an agricultural
zone it would appear that no building permit could issue on the 15
acre new parcel which would be created.
The Committee:
(1) Referred to the minutes of
and October 27, 1969;
(2) Recalled their inspection
Saturday October 25, 1969;
meetings of October 1,
of the property on
and
on the facts alleged and in view of present by-law requirements, the
Committee could not see that a case for severance had been made out.
Application refused on motion by E.F.R. Osborne. Seconded by
K. Schoenmaker. Carried.
CLASSIFICATION "E"
Application File No. 219-69 Messrs. Strike & Strike, Agent,
Barristers & Solicitors,
Bowmanville, Ontario,
Sam Buma,
R.R. #4,Bowmanville, Ontario,
for part of Lot 35, Con 1V,
Township of Clarke,
Submission No. "B"219-69-194
As business arising from minutes of meeting October 27, 1969,
this application was brought forward for further consideration.
Page 8
Meeting Committee of Adjutment November 247 1969;
Mr. Sam Buma the applicant accompanied by his agent M.B. Kelly,
B. Comm. LL.B., Barrister & Solicitor of the firm of Messrs. Strike
& Strike appeared in support of this application. The following
persons also appeared: Mr. G'.Var. Zpk�, representing John DeNith
Beal Estate, Bowmanville, Ontllrio, appeared on behalf of a proposed
purchaser; Mr. Horace Best Zoning Administrator and Mr. Arthur Low
Secretary Planning Board appeared as observers. No other person
appeared in support of, or in opposition to this application.
The Committee find as a fact that the applicant, Mr. Sam Buma
is a bona fide farmer in the area and he has been engaged over
the past few years in dairy farming, the selling of cattle and allied
agricultural pursuits since he emigrated from Holland some years ago.
His application is not for the retention of a lot as a retiring farmer
for whom By-law 1592 as amended by By-law 1653 'sets out a pecific
exception. This particular application is apparently based on the
fact that Mr. Buma wishes to sever approximately ZO acres from his
farm because this 20 acre parcel is unsuitable for him,as cattle
pasturing there have, in the past, taken sick and died. Dr. John
bJerry, "Veterinarian, Bowmanville, Ontario, who examined these cattle,
died suddenly of a heart attack about a year ;:go in Bowmanville and is,
therefore, unavailable for comment on the exact cause of death of these
cattle`.
If this application were cast in the form of an application by a
farmer about to retire, and wishing to retain a lot, it is" the opinion
of the Committee that Mr. Buma might qualify for such a severance.
The application here is, however, not cast in this manner nor are the
necessary allegations to support such an application made herein.
The Committee were also concerned as to the future use of the
proj�erty proposed to be severed. It would not be large enough to
qualify as a farm on`which a building permit could issue in the
agricultural zone under present By-laws.
In the absence of evidence as to the future use of these lands
the Committee hesitated to create a severance which would be sterile
land from a land use viewpoint. No positive evidence was tendered
to show what future use the proposed severed land would be put to.
The Committee pointed out to Mr. Buma and his agent that the
material requested by them at their meeting on October 27, 1969 had
not been provided in the form requested;apparently this•wontd be costly and
verbalevidence regarding the death of cattle was given and accepted.
Mr. Kelly presented the following material to the meeting:
(1) A Plan of Survey, prepared by H.D. Brown, OLS,1106,
Bowmanville, Ontario, dated November 4, 1969,annotated
"Surveyor's Certificate:
The Committee perused the Surveyor's Certificate and upon a
full consideration of the case as submitted were of the opinion that
the fact that the applicant had a problem with this land was not
an automatic reason why the "problem land" should be severed for
someone else to worry about and for a purpose left undefined.
"
The Committee were unable to see that the applicant has made
out a case for a severance and this application was refused on
motion by K. Schoenmaker. Seconded by E.R. Lovekin. Carried.
CLASSIFICATION "E"
Page 9
Meeting Committee of .tidjustment November 24, 1969;
Application File No. "A" 226-69
Parkhill & Yanch, Agent,
Barristers & Solicitors, -
8 Simcoe St. S.,
Oshawa, Ontario,
John Bouwmeester, Owner,
154 Annis Street,
Oshawa, Ontario,
for part of Lot 30, Con 1V,
Township of Clarke,
Submission No. "A"226-69-9
Application was made for exemption or partial exemption from
provisions of Subdivision Control By-law 1592, with amendments
tHeretQ so as to permit a minor variance to authorize reduction of
side yards from 25 feet, as rec;uired by amending by-law 1653 to
side yards of 16 feet 11 inches to permit construction of residence
with attached garage.
The Secretary reported that 17 notices of the said hearing had
been mailed in accordance with Item 4 of The Rules of Procedure.
Mr. and Mrs. John Bouwmeester the applicants, accompanied by
Mrs. Bouwmeester's brother Mr. Harry Bouwhuis of Oshawa, Ontario,
appeared in support of this application. Mr. Horace Best, Zoning
Administrator and Mr. Arthur Low, Secretary, Planning Board appeared
as observers. No other person appeared in support of or in opposition
to this application.
The Secretary -Treasurer presented the following material to
the meeting:
(1) Correspondence from abutting owners, Mr. and Mrs.
Douglas McIlwain, R.R. 41, Orono, Ontario, dated
November 11, 1969. The Committee noted the contents
thereof wherein Mr. and Mrs, •icIlwain had no objection
to the construction of a home by Mr. John Bouwmeester
adjacent to and to the West of their property at a
distance of no less than 16 feet 11 inches from their
property line.
(2) A photostat copy of a Plan of Survey prepared by I.I.D.
Brown, OLS., Boc-manville, Ontario, dated January 4,
1968`, numbered 64090C.
(3) A pen sketch showing the position of the proposed
dwelling on the subject land.
The Committee noted that the application was incorrect, in
that the side yards were shown to be 20' rather than 25' as
required by amending By-law 1653 to by-law 1592. Mr. Bouwmeester
made a motion that the application form"be amended to read 25'
and this was granted. The application form was annotated
accordingly.
Mr. Bouwmeester presented to the Committee for their perusal,..
House Plans drawn by D. Mcllwain, dated November 25, 1968.
The Committee: -
(1) This is an"application to build a house on an
undersized lot which lot is deemed to be a lot of
record under amending By-law 1653 and, therefore,
eligible for a building permit.
(2) The applicant is applying for a minor variance only
'becau"se`the width of the house with an attached garage
reduces the side yards below minimum.
(3) Referred to the correspondence received from abutting
owners to the West of the pro erty, wherein they stated
they had no objection to the proposed construction.
To the East of the property farmlands are held in a
fairly large acreage. The Committee were of the opinion
that these facts would not justify a reduction in side
yards requirements of the magnitude required here,
Page 10
Meeting Committee of Adjustment November 24, 1969;
namely from 25" to less than 171. Such a reduction
is only necessary if the applicant insists on building
a type of structure such as he proposes. In other words,
refusal to reduce the side yard requirements does not
prevent the construction of a house but only the construction
of a type of house proposed by the applicant:which includes
an attached garage. The By-laws of the Township of Clarke
require side yards to be a minimum of 25'
The Committee considered all the facts presented and were
of the opinion that there does not appear to be any
strong factor here which would justify the granting of
this application.
Application refused on motion by K. Schoenmaker. Seconded by
E.F.R. Osborne. Carried.
CLASSIFIED "P"
General Business - A period of discussion was held at the close of
the meeting at which time the Committee
reviewed the following:
Number of Applications received to date 63
Number of meetings to date 23
Number of properties visited 58
Moved by E.F.R. Osborne and seconded by K. Schoenmaker that due
to the extra meetings; time involved in visiting properties and
in drafting decisions; consultations etc., the members receive an
additional fee of $50.00 each. Carried.
The Secretary was requested to requisition Council for a cheque in the
amount of $150.00 for this purpose.
Moved by K. Schoenmaker and seconded by E.F.R. Osborne that
4 ring binders, size 812 x 14 be provided for the members and the
Secretary,to hold by-lawsto be kept up to date for ready reference.
Carried.
The Secretary was requested to purchase the said binders -
Meeting adjourned at 11:30 p.m.
Secretary-Treasur
December 20, 1969
The Committee visited the following properties on Saturday,
December 20, 1969:
Application File'No. 222-69
W. Kay Lycett B.A., Agent,
Barrister & Solicitor,
Orono, Ontario,
Harry "'..Kuehn, Owners,
Christa H. Kuehn,
R.R. 01, !;_;t-ontiille, Ontario,
for part of Lot 6, Con 11,
Township of Clarke,
Submission No."B"222_69_196
As-a•matter of record the Committee visited the property on
Saturday December 20, 1969 at 1:00 p.m. No person was at home.