HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/08/1969MEETING
of the
C0MMITTEE- OF ADJUSTI-'iENT
Monday September 8, 1969 at 8:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
The meeting scheduled for the above-mentioned date was cancelled
by a telephone notice from the Chairman, E. Richard Lovekin, to the
Secretary -Treasurer, Ellen M. Yeo. A quorum of members were unable to
present, therefore the meeting was cancelled until September1 1969
the Council Chamber, and the Secretary was instructe ot• y 1 p
concerned`.
C�� 4a --✓l,. /. 7 ��f-IJP
r Secretary -Treasure' Chairman
MEETING
of the
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMIIT
Saturday, September 13, 1969 at 1:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Present: E.R. Lovekin, Chairman, .
K. Schoenmaker, Member,
E.F.R. Osborne, Member,
Mrs. Ellen M. Yeo, Secretary -Treasurer,
Mr. Arthur Low, Secretary, Planning Board.
Thg8minutes of meeting held on July 14, 1969; decisions made
on July, 1969 and cancellation of September 8, 1969 meeting were
approved as read on motion by K. Schoenmaker and seconded by E.F.R.
Osborne. Carried.
Application File No. 173-69=
George Lumley, Owner,
R.R. #1, Newtonville, Ontario,
for part of Lot 2, Con 111,
Township of Clarke,
Submission No. "B" 173-69-152
This application was brought forward for discussion.
Mr.. K. Schoenmaker, Senior Member, reported that an appeal
by George Lumley against a decision dated March 11, 1969, of the
Committee of Adjustment for the Township of Clarke was heard by
The Ontario Municipal Board, at the Council Chambers of the Town-
ship of Clarke on Monday, July 20, 1969 at 11:00 o'clock in the
forenoon.
The following persons attended:
Mr. K. Schoenmaker and Mr. E.F.R. Osborne, members of the
Committee of Adjustment;
Mr. Horace Best, Building Inspector, for the Township of
Clarke;
Mr. George Lumley, applicant, R.R. #1 Ne.,tonville, Ontario,
Mr. & Mrs. Richard Weaver, proposed owners, R.R. #1,
Newtonville, Ontario,
Mr. Jack Ogden, R.R. #1 Newtonville, Ontario, an abutting
owner;
Two members; of the Ontario Municipal Board conducted the
hearing. The appellant, in his presentation, stated that the
proposed dwelling would not be an accessory to a farm use. The
hearing was adjourned for a period of ten minutes and upon their
return the Board referred to Section 10 Agriculture Zone "A"
"no person shall within any Agricultural Zone, use any land or
erect, alter or use any building or structure, except for such
purposes and in accordance- with such regulations as are per-
mitted by and are in accordance with the following provisions:.
(a) Permitted Uses; (i) all farming uses and uses
accessory thereto including one family detached
dwellings."
The Board thereupon dismissed this appeal.
The Committee were of the opinion that this file is now
finalized and the facts were duly recorded for purposes of the
clarification of the records.
CLASSIFIC"TION "E"