HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/29/1973PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
Saturday, September 29, 1973 at 8:00 a.m.
Present: E.R. Lovekin B.A. LL.B., Chairman
K. Schoenmaker, Member
E.F.R. Osborne, Member
As a matter of record the Committee inspected properties
on Saturday, September 29, 1973 from 8:00 AM to 7:00 PM
and travelled a distance of 110 miles.
Following their tour of inspection the Committee .
prepared draft notes for each application and the Secretary
was instructed:
(a) To prepare the draft notes for presentation
at the meeting to be held on Monday, October
9, 1973 at 7:00 p.m.;
(b) To request Plans of Surveys from applicants,
where required;
(c) To prepare and forward to Toronto, the following
decision:
Application "B"46-73 William J. Stapleton, Owner,
R.R. #2, Newcastle, Ontario,
for part of Lot 12, Con 2,
Township of Clarke,
Submission No. "B"46-73-46
As business arising from former minutes, this application
was brought forward for further consideration. No person
appeared in support of or in opposition to the application.
As a matter of record the whole Committee inspected the
property on Saturday, September 29, 1973.
The Committee interviewed Mr. Stapleton who told them
he is 88 years of age. He appeared to be in very remarkable
health, but, obviously at his age, to continue any large
farming operations is clearly not practical.
Mr. Stapleton confirmed that he will retain the lot on
which his dwelling house and outbuildings are erected.
E.R. Lovekin B.A. LL.B., Chairman, disqualified himself
from participation in the decision as he had previous knowledge
of this matter and Messrs K. Schoenmaker and E.F.R. Osborne,members,
reviewed the application.
The minutes of meeting September 11, 1973 were reviewed;
and reference was made to the fact that a Certified Plan of
Survey #71020, Plan 10& 473, registered March 18, 1971
prepared by M.D. Brown OLS., had been presented at the said
meeting.
Following further discussion it was decided that in
view of the age of the applicant, and in view of the fact
that he is retaining existing buildings and not erecting
any new buildings, no restrictive clause would be required
in the decision.
Application granted on motion by K. Schoenmaker, seconded
by E.F.R. Osborne. Carried.
CLAS81 FICATION 10 "A"
�ecre ary-Srea� r
I