HomeMy WebLinkAbout75-132REPORT N0, 112
ZONING APPLICATION FOR SOUTHEAST
BUILDING CORPORATION
BACKGROUND:
On December 39 1974, an application was submitted for rezoning
of Block E of Plan 702 to permit the construction of two apartment
buildings on the northeast corner of Quinn Drive and Waverly Road in
Bowmanville. These two buildings were to be eight storeys high and
would have contained a total of 120 apartment. The ground floor of
one of these was to contain 7500 square feet of convenience commercial
floor space. Staff recommended that the proposal be approved in pri-
nciple, subject to conformance with several stated design criteria.
A delegation of local residents appeared at the Planning Advisory
Committee meeting to voice their opposition to a high density resi-
dential development on the site. Because of this opposition, the
matter was tabled.
PURPOSE OF APPLICATION:
On April 39 19759 a new application was submitted. This appli-
cation requested the rezoning of Block E, Plan 702. to permit the
construction of a lower density residential -commercial development.
The applicant proposes to build a 2 storey building with convenience
commercial outlets and offices on 649500 square feet of Block E abut-
ting Waverly Road. A 20 unit townhouse development is proposed for
the remaining 53.100 square feet.
- 2 -
OFFICIAL PLAN PROVISIONS:
1. The Interim District Plan - designates the site Urban Residential.
This designation permits limited medium density residential dev-
elopment and "a limited amount of local commercial uses serving
the day-to-day needs of the immediate neighbourhood". Since the
proposed townhouse development does not exceed the maximum den-
sity of 18 dwelling units per net acre articulated in the plan
and the commercial component is neighbourhood oriented, it appears
to conform to these provisions.
2. T e Bowmanville_Official Plan - Since final approval of the Int-
erim District Plan by the Ministry has not yet been obtained, the
provisions of the former Bowmanville OfficialPlan must still be
considered. This plan designated the area Low Density Residential.
This designation permits the development of single family detached
and semi-detached dwellings. It also permits "a limited amount
of greater density residential development" and "a limited amount
of commercial development of a local convenience nature serving
the day-to-day needs of neighbourhood residents".
Although the wording is vague, it would appear that the town-
houses and commercial development proposed for this site conform
to the requirements articulated in this plan.
ZONING PROVISIONS:
1. The Bowmanville Zoning By-law - designates the site Local Commer-
cial permitting convenience stores not. exceeding 1500 square feet
in area. The applicant has requested that a portion of the site
- 3 -
be zoned RM1. The townhouse development proposed for this
p � p portion
of the site conforms to the requirements for this zone.
2. The Porposed Town of Newcastle Zoning By-law - suggests a Local
commercial zoning for the subject site. The commercial component
of this proposed development conforms with the zone provisions.
The provisions of the RM1 zone would allow the townhouse develop-
ment.
CIRCULATION OF APPLICATION:
The application was circulated to the following agencies for
their comment.
1. Durham Regional Police
2. Northumberland and Newcastle Board of Education
3. Peterborough -Victoria -Northumberland and
Newcastle Separate School Board
4. Durham Works Department
5. Bell Canada
6. Bowmanville Public Utilities Commission
7. Newcastle Works Department
8. Newcastle Building Department
9. Newcastle Fire Department
The following agencies did not reply and were assumed to have
no comments.
1. Bell Cwnada
The comments received from the other agencies have been
summarized as follows.
- 4 -
1. The Durham Regional Police advised that they have not adverse
comments to make on this proposal.
2. The Northumberland_and Newcastle Board of Education expressed
concern that the application creates a heavy concentration
almost next door to the site set aside for school purposes.
3. The Peterborough�Victoria-Northiimberland and _Newcastle
ed that they had no object
4. The Durham Works Department advised that there is suffic-
ient water capacity to accommodate this development. Mr.
Goad mentioned that although there is adequate sewage capa-
city for the proposal, the development will not be connected
to the sewer main until the pumping station on the Baseline
Road is complete. However, he stated that this station
will be completed before the site is ready for development.
5. The Bowmanville Pl:.blic Utilities Commission advised that
they had no objections to the proposal.
6. The Newcastle Works Department advised that they had no
objections to the proposal.
7. The Newcastle Building Department advised that they had no
comment on the rezoning as required.
8. The N.swcastle Fire Department advised that the proposal
complied with their list of requirements.
COMMENT:
The Northumberland and Newcastle Board of Education expressed
concern over the "concentration"of development almost next door "to
the school site. However, since this development contains only 20
units, it would not significantly alter school requirements in the
neighbourhood. It should be noted that this development is separ-
ated from the school by Quinn Drive and by a fairly large park.
The townhouses will be adequately serviced end will have access
to stores, schools and open space. The density is within the limits
suggested by the Interim District Plan.
C
- 5 -
COMMENT- (continued)....
The commercial component is primarily geared to its immediate
neighbourhood, generating mainly pedestrian traffic. As a result,
there should be no significant change in local traffic patterns.
For these reasons, it is recommended that the application be
approved in principle, subject to conformity with the provisions of the
new zoning by-law for the uses intended, provided that the applicant
enters into a development agreement with the Town of Newcastle.Zone
Provisions.
RM1 ZONE
Permitted Uses - a row dwelling unit
1. Minimum Lot Area 2400 square feet
2. Minimum Lot Frontage Corner Lot - 45 feet
Other Lot - 20 feet
3. Maximum Density 18 dwelling units per acre
4. Minimum Front Yard Depth 25 feet
5. Minimum Exterior Side Yard Width 25 feet
6. Minimum Interior Side Yard Width 15 feet
7. Minimum Rear Yard Depth 33 feet
8. Minimum Dwelling Unit Area 900 square feet
9. Minimum Landscaped Open Space 30%
10. Maximum Lot Coverage 30%
11. Maximum Height of Buildings 3 Storeys
12. Maximum Number of Dwelling
Units Per Lot 1 only
13. Access to Improved Street
14. Parking Requirements 1.5 spaces per unit
- 6 -
15. Underground Parking is permitted
if it does not lie within the
Street Allowance
16. Access to Parking Areas requires a
driveway not less than 10 feet but
not exceeding 30 feet
li. Minimum Distance Between Driveways 25 feet
18. Minimum Distance Separating a
Driveway from the Street Inter-
section 50 feet
19. Minimum Distance between Driveway
and Side Lot Line 4 feet
20. Minimum Setback 58 feet
ZONE PROVISIONS
LOCAL COMMERCIAL ZONE:
1. Minimum Lot Area
2. Minimum Lot Frontage
3. Minimum Front Yard Depth
4. Minimum Exterior Side Yard Width
5. Minimum Interior Side Yard Width
6. Minimum Rear Yard Depth
7. Maximum Gross Floor Area
8. Maximum Height of Buildings
9. Loading Space Requirements:
NUMBER
LOCATION
ACCESS -
10. Parking Requirements:
NUMBER
10,000 square feet
75 feet
45 feet
45 feet
25 feet
35 feet
1500 square feet per store
2 Storeys
3 spaces
At least 60 feet from
Street Line
Driveway of at least
12 feet
1 space for each 200 square
feet of commercial or office
floor space
7 -
10. (continued).....
ACCESS - Driveway of 10 to
30 feet in width
11. Driveways:
LOCATION - At least 50 feet
from intersection
4 feet from side lot line
MAXIMUM NUMBER - 4
12. A Planting Strip is Required-.
Minimum Width - 10 feet
13. Maximum Setback 78 feet
14. Minimum Separation from
Residential Zone 15 feet
15. Vegetation in Sight Triangle
not to exceed 3 1/2 feet
Respectfully submitted9
George F. Howden9
Planning Director.