HomeMy WebLinkAbout75-118REPORT NO.118
ZONING APPLICATION FOR'J.C. TAMBLYN
1. History of the Application:
On May 279 19749 Mr. J.C. Tamblyn submitted an application for
rezoning for his lot, located on the northwest corner of Durham
Road 4 and the road between lots 26 and 279 Clarke. He owned an
existing vacant building which was of an industrial or commercial
type but which could riot be used because it was zoned agricultural.
On September 239 a report was approved by the P.A.C. which
contained the following paragraphs.
I feel that the use of this property for industrial purposes would
be acceptable9 given that it contains an existing industrial build-
ing, provided that the following conditions were maintained:
(a) The coverage permitted was restricted to the existing building
area plus a minor extension (say 20%).
(b) Access were restricted to one entrance at the far south west
corner of the lot.
(c) Industrial uses were restricted to those which produced no
industrial wastes or pollution and used water only for normal
"domestic" purposes.
(d) No open storage were permitted.
(e) Uses were restricted to those which would not be likely to
generate high traffic volumes entering and leaving the premises.
(f) Any additions to or replacements of the existing building met
all the usual setbacks and other requirements of the zoning
by-law.
Page #2,..,,..
In conclusion, I would recommend that Municipal Planning Consultants
be authorized to draw up an amending by-law and site plan agreement
to permit the use of the applicant's land for industrial purposes
under the above conditions with the cost of this work to be charged
to the applicant. These documents should be circulated to the
Regional Works Department and the Health Unit when they are completed.
Municipal Planning Consultants started work on these documents
but before they were completed, a Mr. Neil Dekoker advised us verb-
ally that he had purchased the property and wished to establish a
meat cutting business therein. We informed him that this use did
not conform with the present by-law nor with the amendment as it had
been approved in principle by the P.A.C. He was advised that his
porposal would require a new application.
Mr. Dekoker expressed a desire to speak to the P.A.C. directly
on this matter and he was listed as a delegation to appear at the
following meeting. However, he did not appear and has not contacted
us since that time. On April 39 19759 we wrote to Mr. Tamblyn
advising him that we were informed that he had sold the property
and unless we heard to the contrary, we would consider the applica-
tion abandoned and close the file on it.
Therefore, I am recommending that this file be closed subject
to re -opening on receipt of a new application from any subsequent
owner.
Respectfully submitted,
. ' �'
f firttlza,
eorg F. Howden,
Planning Director.