Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01-11-2021 Agenda
Clar*wo F1 u 1r'il 1 ■ WIC ' [ME - D DU ®❑®❑❑❑ 7lP H❑ 1111TI❑[SIP ❑ / RFGOR ❑ & R FLM FP E iYL A IDP EI- RM 61 HDP VLLLD HP EHLYR WU EQFLLO 6 71 -DP V❑ ■1, I 1I -M- ■ gig. -et 1'• 11 - Nf1', a Ili. l: ■ : - ►r @�i'I ! ■ t e VA -l- - NE, . FD t '7 II 1`41■■111■■111■■■11: 1°illl■■■1� I : - ■ �I11 ��, ■ ■ e 11) ■ r p , ,11 - 1„� !� .� �. Ir• II, ll ell In Ino . ',11-� DO 11ANI' � 1. - ►►1���li 11 -�- �D � ” IJIII ,1`�il■■111■■111■■■In ,1`4111■■■■ -SII - 1IMEI / FUM 91VITAIN'T1) „ I; 6 0 OM LTAID IM I -ul t-1 11"Jill remmmall],mm a - 10l Ilfi� - - `�; -�- - �'� Fla1 111 ■ - 1a 111 [IC 1: ■ 1" I",I,�. 1r 1" Y 171 Di Il• I - C�olfllmh I ► 11�►"1 11 - �� ■ - 111 a►'(Il' 1'!1ti,-iD I 1: mill SII I' 11► (li}i. /- HV13 li II (I) (1}. /- - 'i CI -D GRM-UHDUW LF GH FHvMMWJGI Tj - SOFHGFR ■ - ID a ID - -e M- 1 -�► li+ K� ►-t '` 9 0 41) li 111 1�� li 11) 71 1 M, 017 ill ■ ill w nee n ff'!i RIC Or.4 DAYARMQ1 ITA/ 3DJHV Fill / D G❑ FN RZ M P H 1B WW H W ID1 HP EHLVR A R- - IMHOLOiLH FR LEU HGMaR! r'!1 : UNWI HSSDLW H ■ CR �r�� 1P ► nl ■. ICS ED EP RM M [ - CJI, u e ry -HI-WJ El ❑❑ ' F FOWAR R 11 WPM ❑❑ R FHPH H W/ on 1a 1" IC+ [I �,►/C:� KI Ill ► ■111 1 '� I.i 1111: 11) 111 1 1.: Y ■7 - ,�JII11111■■■ ■ ■111■ 1 '1�� 111[�X1111 ► C� Y - 111111■ ■■ Fill 3 EWIO HSA/ J V ern- 3 E4FIO H -W J ffM-3 URSRV -G& W J W 12 11 LFM ® P H GP H VU G Fill R LJ❑ AEII PH CPH W 5 HSRLM' 6 FTI❑❑T1111 / RFDAR Fill❑❑❑❑ LJ KZ D IITI❑(1 DMR 1� DM JUR -i R 01 DLGD G9 DL RH 5 FUGE& R LTFH / L NW3 E(FIO H-! J -3 LWH \QM LLU� - H I - H@R_M DA- J 15 F FLHDMR DC9 H4F®IB UM HSR A 01 J UR [1 D G,/ DLI RHGIILID G-(3❑ ❑ \WKHGlYWHLO FUR AFgEkffi R FMR LWM \N G"ZL MG FHIRM ll . H@PM'l H®LJ DUR ❑ ❑ETI❑ 5 LFKDLG❑ R P D -M DL& J 15 HSFM' 6EFI❑❑EFI❑❑5 H R L J W) DFLW,fb H 6 H HM FHVaWi❑❑❑[2 H VL5 RDG[1 d HZ \IR [M 3 DJ HF[fl �1;6170.,ATA "K MOM Illmliolmlivi ❑❑EL 5 D3KD DGR L5 HJ LR DO&M'l L +ARUR LL HJ L1MHi6 HU LFH\/-5 HJ LR R ❑❑ LKDP E5 HJ DUL J L5 MR VHAW R HP EHUL[I❑FFFn❑❑❑C1 FWHIR [D ROR 5 HJ DU9- J 10 L UAMn R L J 12 l04V ■■111■ 5 SEL, II 1U'' 115 FU IR DO& 014-Y UPRUR II FU UM H16 FU FHV15 Fu LR CR ■■ KD- ■:. HJ D.& J 19. SSRYR ul ■ - L J [2 aUM RP WV : RLJ HJR Z 11:15 -•■1111 !1: FtJ LR CO U I ■ Ti ■■■1■ 1 DLIv■I 1 GHS -Q5 HJ D-0- J 6 SSRLM Wto L MNUM - L J 12 L&UM ■■ ■■■■1: !c 1: -D!■1 -Z - D LM ■■■1■ - - ■ 6 MLV & RP - LVAR - I 11n l<r - MD ■■ - G J L LRSDWR 111■111■ 1 -A'- 11 D HI D J - aGl-- FVV J Y " RK' II) L J i. E75177 UiJ DIL J 3 II) L J 111 !Y H HUSP H V& -F - M■ J H M■ D D D 11■■ ■■■■11 HP SUR M3 DLW - ►& - ►:Cu■ZW VIE[I[E[D !■1■■1 LT on FMA I I'm al CJ • D Ill D J 1: HSFM' • 111■■111■111 II 1'• VVV - H G ■■■ N1 : o) 12 11FMO ul !■ - Ull EMMU (I ti • 1 L HG 8 OL J 111 1111■I -Z 1- VH18 MtDMLiLiELi U r :_ - MTW 1 -O'• VUH RMVMFFR ! Il ►" R 1: HSHM' • 111■■111■111 SS(UFDM VTVV . H !vrKr: II) ,_ 12 11 ffM o) ul GF1 - L J ■ EM AR OZ III■ L HL61 L HGF8 (1: 111 MILL v K- WS NOW NEILIL111 UKZD 11111:; - WH ■■■1■ : - - e F e ■ HMUM DA- J 1:. ►.. pus FKF016 ,. �� H ■■■ - i& II) " II D GJL1 - HGI 11111 !1111 111■11111 I.. DWIT5 FU DLG- J L,5 HSRLM' • 111■■ II 1'• VAW - H G I/I 1 L HG -8■ OL J In !11111I RZ K- \A -i[8 WDNIEIFIFIFI U KZ 1 1 &R LWH 1 - ►R VZLH HLWMLFR VGHLM CR L5 HSRN'• 111■■111■111 SSUDW D ►,. \IV P H !WI:. o) .. 12 11 FM o) ID ! - L J ■ EM A a�;' M L HF6Ili L FM Wi OL J ul !■1■7 RZ 1- \AHi8 WIEW ■■■■■ U KZ D 111■:'. - WHE 111■111■ IJI: �D F• .- ►�,I .111■■111■11111 IF t 1'• D"■ - AFE1M VgH & II) " M II) 111 C R L J ■ [I1� V(,.■ (I;� Ib 1,.�1�■ 1 L HIG i. OL J 111 QIII■I RZ /' \A -i[8 WDNIMFIEI D 111■ 0 RJR VRA WM 1; - MGiIW LR 15 HSRn' . ■1■■■1■111 WZ ulrl L HF " a L FM OL J ul rn1■7 RZ /' :, WIDW ■■■■ UKZD MIL:- UWHFI FRB-K/SR GH ■ 111■111■ ■1■111■ ■ n Ili', ! ti tl:' \AffVL& D Dl�II W1111,1 ■ iD DOU 6W*hvIAr'.Vf-,-3r*DKaD 2S [o - 1'• 1�,_n� �'�i� N� Iii, - e ��110 11% - r,,.■ . r. ❑❑❑ 3 UIFM-i \UIR V 1 R H ■■■ 11) 111 QY I:'.' (+� . � � 1�u .' � ❑❑IIII❑ 3' 6 [ITI❑❑ETI❑FW SS(FD►M \MR- P H GMA M J SIR IL2 I I Ir -m ® D G ❑❑❑ R L J❑ LM AR 90 DI L HC6 Vaki 10 L HG5 VHF- LL J D G[ID❑ 7 RZ KR V416 WDNI❑❑❑❑ U KZ D 1& R UWH ■ . 111■■111■11111 ■ SSQFOOR II 11-71E OII HitLPW:1 ' H e\�" 1 MZ ARF3 RP YWHY H HUSPCis Ill r:. R• P HLFM LRSHWnRU D19 DUHAM 1 111 1n ■■■111 tlll■■■■ II H15 'C 11 'R ' D LO ❑❑®❑ 3' 6 LI]❑❑LL❑LIB H R L J W DFL UNLEL6 H HW FHVDWLI❑❑C2 H V5 RDG L❑ L d FE \IR LS m ❑ 3' 6 i-L❑❑LLLiW L G HM U; S M J UR Ll LP WC -3 U9 SRVHG 5 HG L❑ / L H5 H LYIR VARD� LUW SSLR H1313 ® FR 16 EGL LYIR D G5 H R L J 1 RUIK HWM RU HIJR CI LDG [� UL HLD G[5 G -M RDGIfl H7_ FDMM ❑❑®❑ 3' 6 IFE❑❑®❑EE6 FDS DOB Lfl--Q DIM DM -3192) UDP E❑❑❑5 W W- C❑ * U- M HV TD C331;FHG UM/ ❑❑®❑ 3' 6 LL❑❑LL❑L[EI&RP P LTJ *iR ❑ GM\,I AR H W LIE ❑ d HZ L❑ ❑❑❑ 8 1 L MQ -GE VL HW ■■111■ X� �'s- t■ [l1) 111■■■■t■■111■ IBM [��� \�"[I - P� - 1'�i1C� ■■■ eK. I I) fl ■ ■ ■ 11 �'' K. � ►'�� - ►�,, - ► ' 11]!i� CI I :- r �i . �. ;•,.- e■ [��) 111■■■■t■■111■ 111■ [II) x F1 - �� ■■ L '�' 1�l�Y ■��' ■,�JII■11111■■■r:. C 1111 ���,1 ■ ■■■ - e 1rI1{o ❑❑❑ GR U P H W "Wil' 111 ClarhWWn If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 Planning and Development Committee Minutes Date: December 7, 2020 Time: 7:00 p.m. Location: Council Members (in Chambers or MS Teams) I Members of the Public (MS Teams) Present Were: Councillor G. Anderson Present Via Electronic Mayor A. Foster, Councillor R. Hooper, Councillor J. Jones, Means: Councillor J. Neal, Councillor C. Traill, Councillor M. Zwart Staff Present: J. Gallagher, L. Patenaude Present Via Electronic A. Allison, F. Langmaid, K. Richardson, A. Burke, L. Backus, Means: C. Salazar, C. Strike 1. Call to Order Councillor Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Land Acknowledgment Statement Councillor Traill led the meeting in the Land Acknowledgement Statement. 3. New Business a Introduction Councillor Neal asked that a new business item, regarding Adhoc Jury Lands Negotiation Committee, be added to the New Business - Consideration section of the Agenda. Councillor Zwart asked that a new business item, regarding Bill 229, be added to the New Business a Consideration section of the Agenda. Suspend the Rules Resolution # PD -196-20 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Hooper That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to add the following delegations to the Agenda: F Item 9.9 - Ronald F. Worboy, Worboy Law, Regarding Report PSD - 055 -20 Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan - Recommendation Report for Official Plan Amendment 124 1 3 T Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 C Item 9.10 - Diana White, Regarding Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice F Item 9.11 - Bryan Noble, Regarding Report PSD -058-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment to Permit a Total of 205 Residential Units Contained with an Apartment Building and Townhouses within a Common Elements Condominium in Bowmanville Carried 4. Adopt the Agenda Resolution # PD -197-20 Moved by Councillor Jones Seconded by Mayor Foster That the Agenda for the Planning and Development Committee meeting of December 7, 2020, be adopted with the following additions: F Delegation 9.9 - Ronald F. Worboy, Worboy Law, Regarding Report PSD -055-20 Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan - Recommendation Report for Official Plan Amendment 124 L Delegation 9.10 - Diana White, Regarding Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice L Delegation 9.11 - Bryan Noble, Regarding Report PSD -058-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment to Permit a Total of 206 Residential Units Contained with an Apartment Building and Townhouses within a Common Elements Condominium in Bowmanville F Communication Item 10.2 - Petition Regarding Agenda Item 13.4, Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice F Communication Item 11.2 - Ronald F. Worboy, Worboy Law, Regarding Report PSD -055-20 Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan - Recommendation Report for Official Plan Amendment 124 Carried 2 3 T Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 5. Declaration of Interest There were no disclosures of interest stated at this meeting. 6. Announcements Members of Committee announced upcoming community events and matters of community interest. 7. Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting 7.1 Minutes of a Regular Meeting of November 16, 2020 Resolution # PD -198-20 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Jones That the minutes of the regular meeting of the Planning and Development Committee meeting held on November 16, 2020, be approved. Carried 8. Public Meetings There were no Public Meetings. 9. Delegations 9.1 Patrick Byrne, Kingsway Arms, Regarding Assisted Living Facility in Bowmanville Patrick Bryne, Kingsway Arms, was present via electronic means regarding an Assisted Living Facility in Bowmanville. Mr. Bryne thanked Committee for their time and provided a background on the Kaitlin Corporation and Kingsway Arms retirement homes and added that they have ran the Monarch Seniors Club for over 12 years. Mr. Bryne stated that their vision is to build a campus for seniors that would be fully integrated so seniors can age in place gracefully, at the Stevens Road site. He displayed the proposed campus outlining how many units will be included. Mr. Bryne outlined the components on the site that include 12 one-story independent living bungalows, 140 senior apartment rentals for independent living, 150 privately owned condominiums , 140 units of full-service offering assisted daily living, 130 units with cognitive impairment offering memory care, and a 50,000 square foot Monarch Senor's Club in the centre of the campus. He added that the facility is available for seniors who don't reside at the campus but can utilize the services and he noted the importance of socialization for seniors. Mr. Bryne noted that waiting lists for long term care beds in Clarington are at least two years long which means that seniors are leaving to other regions. He explained that the campus will create over 175 new jobs and will create a great opportunity for seniors in Clarington. Mr. Bryne answered questions from Members of Committee. 3 3 T Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 9.2 Devon Daniell, Kaitlin Corporation, Regarding Assisted Living Facility in Bowmanville Devon Daniell, Kaitlin Corporation, was present via electronic means regarding an Assisted Living Facility in Bowmanville. Mr. Daniell outlined the challenges Kaitlin Corporation has been facing with their proposed VHFIEWcampus facility and noted that that he was advised by Staff that he is unable to submit an application until the Secondary Plan is approved. He explained that the approval process will take time and displayed the site plan proposal of a similar campus. Mr. Daniell requested that Committee direct staff to evaluate the planning process to receive some direction for a faster way to move forward with the approval process and answered questions from members of Committee. Resolution # PD -199-20 Moved by Councillor Jones Seconded by Councillor Neal Whereas seniors are the fastest growing age group in Ontario; And whereas seniors are important to our Clarington community and want to live near their families and at present the wait times for Long Term Care can be years long and wait times for assisted living facilities can also be very long; And whereas aging in place, cluster services and programing that encourages social interaction improves quality of life; Now therefore be it resolved: That the delegation of Devon Daniell, Kaitlin Corporation and Patrick Byrne, Kingsway Arms regarding Assisted Living Facility in Bowmanville, be received with thanks; That Staff report back at the January or February 2021 Planning and Development Committee Meeting on what the most expeditious planning process or processes are to move forward in approving a seniors living/assisted living complex/facility at the Stevens Road location in Bowmanville; and That all interested parties be notified of Council's decision. Carried 4 3 T Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 9.3 Rodger Miller, Miller Planning Services, Regarding Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice Rodger Miller, Miller Planning Services, was present via electronic means regarding Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice. Mr. Miller explained the background of the application and displayed an illustration of the intended development and the site line concept. Mr. Miller addressed the conflicts raised regarding the trees along Richfield Square and explained the two proposed site plans which include removing the trees and leaving the existing trees. He also addressed concerns raised regarding traffic and transit and advised that bicycle racks and a free Durham Region Presto Card Transit Pass will be included with a bus stop located adjacent to the development. Mr. Miller explained that the traffic study estimated six a.m. peak trips and seven p.m. peak trips. Mr. Miller addressed concerns regarding air conditioners and meter screening placement noting that some air conditioners will be concealed from street view with installations on a terrace balcony located internally to the project and some being located in the backyard. He added that gas and hydro meters will be recessed within the masonry exterior wall, installed on the private lane side and answered questions from members of Committee. 9.4 Gina Brouwer, Regarding Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice Gina Brouwer was present via electronic means regarding Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice, to answer questions from members of Committee. 9.5 David Lee, Candevcon Limited, Regarding Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice David Lee, Candevcon Limited, was present via electronic means regarding Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice, to answer questions from members of Committee. 5 3 TFI Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 9.6 Rodrick Sutherland, Kaitlin Corporation, Regarding Report PSD -058-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment to Permit a Total of 205 Residential Units Contained with an Apartment Building and Townhouses within a Common Elements Condominium Rodrick Sutherland, Kaitlin Corporation, was present via electronic means regarding Report PSD -058-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment to Permit a Total of 205 Residential Units Contained with an Apartment Building and Townhouses within a Common Elements Condominium, Bowmanville. Mr. Sutherland noted that they agree with the recommendations contained in the Staff report and answered questions from members of Committee. 9.7 Gord Robinson, Regarding Item 11.1, LPAT Decision for East Gwillimbury, ZONE Clarington - Review of Potential Alternative Approaches Gord Robinson was present via electronic means regarding Item 11.1, LPAT Decision for East Gwillimbury, ZONE Clarington - Review of Potential Alternative Approaches. Mr. Robinson provided a background on the East Gwillimbury appeal and explained the key aspects from their report. He stated that he was advised that Clarington was waiting for the decision of East Gwillimbury as the situations are similar. Mr. Robinson explained that Clarington residents want a similar approach and solutions. He requested that all property owners and effected owners be notified of each step and urged that a serious attempt be made to reach a decision, and that effort should be made to avoid unnecessary costs to landowners. Mr. Robinson stated that landowners were not notified nor had the opportunity to share their views on the amendment. He concluded by noting that any consideration to lift the motion off the table must be made in a transparent way. 9.8 Stephen Shine, Regarding Item 11.1, LPAT Decision for East Gwillimbury, ZONE Clarington - Review of Potential Alternative Approaches Stephen Shine's name was called and was not present. 9.9 Ronald F. Worboy, Worboy Law, Regarding Report PSD -055-20 Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan - Recommendation Report for Official Plan Amendment 124 Ronald F. Worboy, Worboy Law, was present via electronic means regarding Report PSD -055-20 Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan - Recommendation Report for Official Plan Amendment 124. Mr. Worboy explained that he had a discussion with Planning Staff about his client[8 concerns regarding the change of residential use at the corner of Courtice Road and Highway 2. He concluded by stating that he is confident he can work out a reasonable transition from high density to medium density with a park included with Staff by the next Council meeting. n 3 TFI Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 9.10 Diana White, Regarding Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice Diana White was present via electronic means regarding Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice. Ms. White stated that the proposal is too dense for the parcel of land. She expressed her concerns regarding traffic and the number of entrances to the development. Ms. White added that, instead of the proposal, there could be a roundabout for traffic to help with the overlapping turn issues. She stated her concerns regarding parking on Richfield Square and the amount of visitor parking available. Ms. White questioned where the excess snow will be dumped as the designated area is too small. She explained the difficulty of exiting Fourth Street onto Nash Road during peak hours and answered questions from Members of Committee. 9.11 Bryan Noble, Regarding Report PSD -058-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment to Permit a Total of 205 Residential Units Contained with an Apartment Building and Townhouses within a Common Elements Condominium, Bowmanville Bryan Noble was present via electronic means regarding PSD -058-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment to Permit a Total of 205 Residential Units Contained with an Apartment Building and Townhouses within a Common Elements Condominium in Bowmanville. Mr. Noble provided a background of the proposal and noted he spoke in 2018 regarding this matter. He expressed his concerns regarding the increased intensification from stacked towns and semis to the addition of a six -story apartment building. Mr. Noble noted that he is echoing his concerns raised in 2018 and added that if he knew the details of the proposed development EKHLZR❑ OW have purchased his home. He added that other residents in the area are in the same mindset and then answered questions from Members of Committee. Recess Resolution # PD -200-20 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Jones That the Committee recess for 10 minutes. Carried The meeting reconvened at 9:02 p.m. with Councillor Anderson in the Chair. 7 3 TFI Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 10. Communications F1 Receive for Information 10.1 Linda Gasser's Response to Durham Region Regarding Mixed Waste Pre -Sort Proposed Anaerobic Digestion Facility Resolution # PD -201-20 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Hooper That Communication Item 10.1 regarding Linda Gasser's Response to Durham Region Regarding Mix Waste Pre -Sort Proposed Anaerobic Digestion Facility, be received for information. Carried, See following motion Resolution # PD -202-20 Moved by Councillor Jones Seconded by Mayor Foster That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Committee to speak to the foregoing Resolution #PD -201-20 for a second time. Carried The foregoing Resolution #PD -201-20 was then put to a vote and carried. 10.2 Petition Regarding Agenda Item 13.4, Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice Resolution # PD -203-20 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Jones That Communication Item 10.2 be referred to the consideration of Report PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice. Carried 11. Communications F1 Direction 11.1 Memo from Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning and Development Services, Regarding LPAT Decision for East Gwillimbury, ZONE Clarington - Review of Potential Alternative Approaches Resolution # PD -204-20 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Hooper That Council direct Staff to report back on the potential alternative options to rural area zoning; 8 3 TF1 Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 That notice is hereby given that the matter of the rural portion of the zoning by- law amendment be lifted from the table; and That all interested parties be notified of the upcoming report. Motion Withdrawn, see following motion Resolution # PD -205-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Traill That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Committee to speak to the foregoing Resolution #PD -204-20 for a second time. Carried The foregoing Resolution #PD -204-20 was withdrawn. Resolution # PD -206-20 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Neal That notice is hereby given that the matter of the rural portion of the zoning by- law amendment be lifted from the table; and That all interested parties be notified of the upcoming report. Carried 11.2 Ronald F. Worboy, Worboy Law, Regarding Report PSD -055-20 Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan - Recommendation Report for Official Plan Amendment 124 Resolution # PD -207-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Neal That Communication Item 11.2 be referred to the consideration of Report PSD -055-20 Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan - Recommendation Report for Official Plan Amendment 124. Carried 12. Presentations There were no Presentations. 9 3 TF1 Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 13. Planning and Development Services Reports 13.1 PSD -052-20 Heritage Incentive Grant Program Annual Report for 2020 Resolution # PD -208-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Mayor Foster That Report PSD -052-20 be received; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -052-20 and any delegations be DGYW-GSI C❑ R❑EFLC VV_G+U R❑❑ Carried 13.2 PSD -053-20 Environmental Stewardship Program - 2020 Annual Report Resolution # PD -209-20 Moved by Councillor Zwart Seconded by Mayor Foster That Report PSD -053-20 be received; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -053-20 and any delegations be DGMM-G-H IT R❑LIFLOt&FLVIR❑❑ Carried 13.3 PSD -054-20 An Application by Goldmanco Inc. to Amend Sign By-law 2009-123 to Permit Two Oversized Ground Signs at the Southeast Corner of Highway 2 and Trulls Road, Courtice Resolution # PD -210-20 Moved by Councillor Jones Seconded by Councillor Neal That Report PSD -054-20 be received; That two ground signs be permitted, measuring 4.01 m in height and 5.6 m2 in display area, in accordance with all other applicable provisions of the Sign By-law 2009-123, at the southeast corner of Highway 2 and Trulls Road, Courtice; That the amending By-law attached to Report PSD -054-20, as Attachment 2, be approved; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -054-20 and any delegations be DGAM- G RI T R❑JqD Q-FLVIR❑❑ Carried 10 3 T❑ Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 13.4 PSD -055-20 Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan Recommendation Report for Official Plan Amendment 124 Resolution # PD -211-20 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Jones That Report PSD -055-20 be received; That Official Plan Amendment 124 to include the Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan in the Clarington Official Plan be adopted; That, upon adoption by Council, the Southeast Courtice Secondary Plan be LP S®P H❑1hGET6 V91 I DVLL]I R�11IFLCVLSR(FE[RIIM G0MLD G�S®❑dLJ P C1MY0 and be implemented through the capital budget program; That the Director of Planning and Development Services be authorized to finalize the form and content of OPA 124, the Secondary Plan and the Urban Design and Sustainability Guidelines resulting from Council's consideration, public participation, agency comments and technical considerations; That the Urban Design and Sustainability Guidelines appended to the Secondary Plan be approved and be used by staff to guide development applications and public projects; That the Director of Planning and Development Services be authorized to execute any agreements to implement the Secondary Plan once adopted by Council; That OPA 124 be forwarded to the Region of Durham for approval; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -055-20 and any delegations be DGMM-G-RITR-11-FL0tG-FMR❑U%DLG- J -the adoption of the Secondary Plan. Carried as Amended, See following motion Resolution # PD -212-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Jones That the foregoing Resolution #PD -211-20 be amended by adding the following at the end of Paragraph 2: "with the addition of Section 5.4.5 as follows: Private streets and private lanes are not permitted within the Low Density Urban Residential Designation." Carried The foregoing Resolution #PD -211-20 was then put to a vote and carried as amended. 11 3 T❑ Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 13.5 PSD -056-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning to Permit a Block of 17 Townhouse Units within a Common Elements Condominium, Courtice Resolution # PD -213-20 Moved by Councillor Jones Seconded by Mayor Foster That Report PSD -056-20 be received; That the application for a Draft Plan of Subdivision submitted by LCJ Thomas Estates Inc. c/o Sakmet Developments to permit a townhouse block, be supported subject to the conditions contained in Attachment 2 to Report PSD -056-20; That the application to amend Zoning By-law 84-63 be approved and that the Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 3 to Report PSD -056-20 be passed; That, once all conditions contained in the Official Plan with respect to the removal of the (H) Holding Symbol are satisfied, the By-law authorizing the removal of the (H) Holding Symbol be approved; That no further Public Meeting be required for the future Common Elements Condominium; That the Durham Regional Planning and Economic Development Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PSD-056-11❑7J❑G_i_ R❑❑ ED❑G That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -056-20 and any delegations be DGyW- G_RI T R❑EFKW +LVLR❑❑ Yes (5): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Jones, and Councillor Zwart No (2): Councillor Neal, and Councillor Traill Carried on a recorded vote (5 to 2) 13.6 PSD -057-20 Community Improvement Plan Programs 2020 - Annual Report Resolution # PD -214-20 Moved by Councillor Zwart Seconded by Councillor Hooper That Report PSD -057-20 be received; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -057-20 and any delegations be DGAVHG RI T R❑EFIWQ FLVIR❑❑ Carried 12 3 T❑ Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 13.7 PSD -058-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment to Permit a Total of 205 Residential Units Contained with an Apartment Building and Townhouses within a Common Elements Condominium in Bowmanville Resolution # PD -215-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Mayor Foster That Report PSD -058-20 be received; That the application for a Draft Plan of Subdivision submitted by MODO Bowmanville Urban Towns Limited (The Kaitlin Group) to permit 205 future condominium residential units including 55 dual frontage townhouses, 64 back to back townhouses and 86 apartment units, be supported subject to the conditions contained in Attachment 1 to Report PSD -058-20; That the application to amend Zoning By-law 84-63 be approved and that the Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 2 to Report PSD -058-20 be passed; That, once all conditions contained in the Official Plan with respect to the removal of the (H) Holding Symbol are satisfied, the By-law authorizing the removal of the (H) Holding Symbol be approved; That no further Public Meeting be required for the future Common Elements Condominium; That the Durham Regional Planning and Economic Development Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of report PS D-058- ❑[ID❑GT R❑CFLOV-GFLMR]EID❑G That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -058-20 and any delegations be DGYW-bbl T R❑]FL0V-G+LMR 1❑ Yes (2): Mayor Foster, and Councillor Zwart No (5): Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Jones, Councillor Neal, and Councillor Traill Motion Lost (2 to 5), See following motion Resolution # PD -216-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Jones That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Committee to speak to the foregoing Resolution #PD -215-20 for a second time. Carried The foregoing Resolution #PD -215-20 was then put to a recorded vote and lost. 13 3 T❑ Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 Suspend the Rules Resolution # PD -217-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Jones That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the meeting for an additional 30 minutes until 11:30 p.m. Carried Resolution # PD -218-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Hooper That Report PSD -058-20 Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment to Permit a Total of 205 Residential Units Contained with an Apartment Building and Townhouses within a Common Elements Condominium in Bowmanville, be referred to Staff. Carried 13.8 PSD -059-20 Proposed Amendment to Heritage Designation By-law 2014- 84; 210 and 224 King Ave. W, Newcastle Resolution # PD -219-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Zwart That Report PSD -059-20 be received; That the Municipal Clerk and Staff be authorized to carry out the necessary actions, including the notification to amend the designation By-law 2014-084 for 210 and 224 King Avenue W. pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O 1990, c.O.18; That the Mayor and Municipal Clerk be authorized to enact the amending By- law, being Attachment 2 to Report PSD -059-20, to amend heritage designation By-law 2014-84; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -059-20 and any delegations be DGYWMQ-RI T R❑LFID[Q fLMRI[I Carried 14 3 T❑ Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 14. New Business F1 Consideration 14.1 Adhoc Jury Lands Negotiation Committee (Councillor Neal) Resolution # PD -220-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Traill That New Business Item 14.1, be referred to the meeting when the OPA 121 (regarding Jury Lands and Special Policy Area F) will be before Committee. Carried 14.2 Bill 229 Resolution # PD -221-20 Moved by Councillor Zwart Seconded by Mayor Foster Whereas the Municipality of Clarington is concerned that the passing of Schedule 6, regarding amendments to the Conservation Authorities Act, of Bill 229, Protect, Support and Recover from COVID-19 Act (Budget Measures), 2020 will result in negative impacts to the conservation of the environment; Now therefore the Municipality of Clarington requests that Schedule 6 be withdrawn pending further consultation with the public, Conservation Authorities, and Municipalities; and That the Premier, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, and local MPPs be notified. Yes (5): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Jones, and Councillor Zwart No (2): Councillor Neal, and Councillor Traill Carried on a recorded vote (5 to 2) 15 3 TFI Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 7, 2020 15. Unfinished Business 15.1 Wendy Bracken regarding Correspondence from Ravi Mahabir, Dillon Consulting responding to Wendy Bracken's Concerns regarding a Discrepancy in Dioxin Furan Between Dillon Consulting's Presentation and Posted DYEC Reports Resolution # PD -222-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Zwart That Unfinished Business Item 15.1, Correspondence from Wendy Bracken regarding Correspondence from Ravi Mahabir, Dillon Consulting responding to Wendy Bracken's Concerns regarding a Discrepancy in Dioxin Furan Between Dillon Consulting's Presentation and Posted DYEC Reports, be referred to Staff to request a response, in writing, from Dillion Consulting. Carried 16. Confidential Reports There were no Reports for this section of the Agenda. 17. Adjournment Resolution # PD -223-20 Moved by Councillor Hooper Seconded by Councillor Traill That the meeting adjourn at 11:13 p.m. Carried Chair 16 3 TFI Municipal Clerk Clarington If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 Planning and Development Committee Minutes Date: December 9, 2020 Time: 5:00 p.m. Location: Microsoft Teams Present Were: Councillor G. Anderson Present Via Electronic Mayor A. Foster, Councillor R. Hooper, Councillor J. Jones, Means: Councillor J. Neal, Councillor C. Traill, Councillor M. Zwart Staff Present: J. Gallagher, L. Patenaude Present Via Electronic A. Allison (left at 5:45 p.m.), F. Langmaid, A. Burke Means: 1. Call to Order Councillor Anderson called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. 2. Land Acknowledgement Statement Mayor Foster led the meeting in the Land Acknowledgement Statement. 3. Declaration of Interest There were no disclosures of interest stated at this meeting. 4. Confidential Matter 4.1 Confidential Litigation Matter Related to the Proposed Anaerobic Digestor Dispute 4.2 Confidential Matter Regarding the Home Hardware Ministerial Zoning Order Closed Session Resolution # PD -224-20 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Neal That, in accordance with Section 239 (2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, the meeting be closed for the purpose of discussing matters that deal with: litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; and 1 3 TFI Special Planning and Development Committee Minutes of December 9, 2020 a position, plan, procedure, criteria, or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the Municipality of local board. Carried The meeting resumed in open session at 7:38 p.m. 0 DJC R\ANMI G IGANDMR_1WV2H_H_VFLW-GL_FRV �FLIEI accordance with Section 239(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001 as amended, and two resolutions were passed on a procedural matter and one resolution was passed to provide direction to Staff. Confidential Litigation Matter Related to the Proposed Anaerobic Digestor Dispute Resolution # PD -225-20 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Councillor Hooper That Staff report back on boundary options for an Interim Control By-law on the land within Energy Park Secondary Plan area and environs. Yes (7): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Councillor Hooper, Councillor Jones, Councillor Neal, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart Carried on a recorded vote (7 to 0) 5. Adjournment Resolution # PD -226-20 Moved by Councillor Neal Seconded by Councillor Traill That the meeting adjourn at 7:44 p.m. Carried Chair 2 3 T❑ Deputy Clerk Clarington Nonce of Public Meeting A land use change has been proposed, have your say! The Municipality is seeking public comments before making a decision on applications for a proposed Clarington Official Plan amendment and Zoning By-law amendment. The Municipality is seeking public input on applications to amend the Clarington Official Plan – Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan and the Zoning By-law to allow a nine storey mixed use building and 45 stacked townhouse units at 1465 Highway 2 in Courtice. The nine storey building is proposed to contain 132 residential units plus 254 square metres of commercial floor space. The site plan details, and tenure will be addressed through future Site Plan and Plan of Condominium applications. 1465 Highway 2, east of Darlington Boulevard and Varcoe Road in Courtice. Whine Cli f fey S. —Courtice Heath Centre • , Esso / Circle K I I - I I I I I 0 O —r---•--- 40' �Qt� o do 1 Apartment Building - 9 Storey - 132 Units 2 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 14 Units 3 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 6 Units 4 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 10 Units 5 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 10 Units 6 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 5 Units For additional information on the proposed Clarington Official Plan amendment and Zoning By-law amendment, the background studies are available for review on our website at clarington.net/developmentproposals Questions? Please contact Mitch Morawetz at 905-623- 3379. extension 2411. or by email at mmoravdetz(q)�clarinaton.net Our procedures have changed as we continue to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic. As mandated by Public Health, to maintain physical distancing these meetings will take place electronically. This meeting is live -streamed for public viewing at www.clarington.net/calendar. Date: January 11, 2021 Time: 7:00 PM Place: Electronic Teams meeting by way of on-line device or telephone If you wish to speak at the public meeting, please pre -register and you will be provided with further instructions. You can pre -register by completing the online form at www.clarington.net/delegations or contact the Clerk's Department at 905-623-3379 ext. 2109 or clerks _clarington.net by Friday, January 8, 2021 at 3:30 p.m. If you are unable to participate electronically, please contact the Clerk's Department and we will do our utmost to accommodate you. We encourage you to submit your written comments for Committee's consideration to mmorawetz(a)-clarington.net or by mail or drop box to 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON L1 C 3A6 prior to the date of the public meeting I File Number: COPA 2020-0005 and ZBA 2020-0019 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act The personal information you submit will become part of the public record and may be released to the public. Questions about the information we collect can be directed to the Clerk's Department at 905- 623-3379, extension 2102. Accessibility If you have accessibility needs and require alternate formats of this document or other accommodations, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Appeal Requirements If you do not speak at the public meeting or send your comments or concerns to the Municipality of Clarington before the by-law is passed: a) you will not be entitled to appeal the decision to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal; and b) you will not be able to participate at a hearing of an appeal before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, in the opinion of the Tribunal, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Faye Langmaid, FCSLA, RPP Acting Director of Planning and Development Services \\netapp5\group\Planning\^Department\Application Files2BA-Zoning\20202BA2020-0019 1465 Highway 2 Courtice\Public Notice\ZBA2020-0019 - Public Meeting Notice - COVID.docx Application By: 1465 King Street Inc. Applications to amend the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By- law to allow a nine -storey mixed use building and 45 townhouse units at 1465 Highway 2, Cou rtice Public Meeting: January 11, 2021 View from Regional Highway 2, looking southwest DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Applicant 1465 King Street Inc. Site Location 1465 Highway 2, Courtice Proposal: To amend the Clarington Official Plan — Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan and the Zoning By-law to allow a nine storey mixed use building and 45 stacked townhouse units. The nine storey building (#1) is proposed to contain 132 residential units plus 254 square metres of commercial floor space. Buildings #2 to #6 would contain a total of 45 stacked townhouse units. Files: Clarington Official Plan amendment COPA 2020-0005 & Zoning Bylaw amendment ZBA 2020-0019 v Wheif{e_ + ', -- Courtice Terra e Heaih Centre - a O Esso /Circle K - O O s i 3 O �l ` _�Tke'uplands ,',��atl o° J� 1 I Apartment Building - 9 Storey - 132 Units o ` 2 1 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 14 Units �L 3 1 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 6 Units 41 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 10 Units S 1 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 10 Units 0 61 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 5 Units 1111■ NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Our procedures have changed as we continue to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic. As mandated by Public Health, to maintain physical distancing this meeting will take place in an electronic format using an online device or telephone. Date: Monday, January 11, 2021 Time: 7:00 pm Place: Electronic Teams Meeting If you wish to speak at the public meeting, please pre -register and you will be provided with further instructions. You can pre -register by completing the online form at iww.clarington.net/delegations or contact the Clerk's Department at 905-623-3379 ext. 2109 or clerks(a)clarington.net by Friday, January 8, 2021 at 3:30 p.m or submit your written comments to the Planner by email or to 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON, L1C 3A6 FIND OUT MORE i Contact the Planner Mitch Morawetz Planning Services Department © 905-623-3379 ext. 2411 mmorawetz(a)-clarington.ne Public Comments • Proposed development could be premature • Destruction of green space and wildlife habitat • Increased traffic on area roads • A greater need for commercial vs. residential at this location • Combined with "The Uplands", the development is too dense INN ■�r■ Eel �■� �.� � fir: armor ��■r�w� .-. i IBM ElI! r ■ 1465 DURHAM HIGHWAY 2 I Statutory Public Meeting January 11, 2020 3 ®❑ U,Da+D SAN e IL \\ ` , — i vpToMm— _,mr- i x low�"-`'., ru.1 F_ L A 3 1 O ®❑ AW t1�// if i —� A t i 4v4 J ,rt O Cn O Ir LU z 0 CLOVERFIELD ST NASH ROAD NASH ROAD NASH ROAD DALE PARK DR ' - BRIDLE COURT 0 1o DALE PARK DR m m LU mat'.. U LU 1 � L?L1R HAM i L—j ilCHWAy DURHAM Fil� L_m �IVkY -� Wi 4r1 W. 1 U ❑ KNGWAY GATE w � J LCL 0 go In z G EMPIRE CR J ■ Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan Map A w J w w U B ILL [7[JRFighp OF .0001 a 16 w Q CL 7 l--- w [7 O w NASH ROAD TRAIL PP do� � .0�� inJRHAM NIGMAY 2 U ���IFi ❑ STIRLING AVENUE I STRATH LL iJRfV� I - Co.-emal = Mid -Rise High Density Residential C mnmercial Mixed Use � Low Rise High Density Res-dentiai C,,,,,. ty Facility Medium Density Residential Enwonmental Protection Area Secondary Plan Boundary ® Town Centre Commercial Torun Centre Special 3tudyArea 'Empow, "wimmor A ----A ANN 4t, If THANK YOU Kelly Graham, RPP SvN Architects + Planners kgraham@svn-ap.com a I r] ft - f 9N.\ Municipality of Clarington Planning & Development Committee Resolution # Date: January 11, 2021 Moved by: Councillor Traill Seconded by: That pre -budgetary approval of up to $ to hire an outside planning consultant to provide options for recreational vehicle storage in Clarington; and That Planning staff report back with a summary of what is currently permitted by the ❑®EIEIJ R❑TF12 fficial Plan and Zoning By-laws with respect to recreational vehicle storage, and to identify any additional land use categories with the potential for this use; and information on how recreational vehicle storage has been addressed in similar municipalities. 3 E❑ Inventory of RV Storage Lands in Clarineton - Regort Version x # of RV units Visible in Lot MCC Aerial Size Mac View Photos Ward Address ARN PIN Acres OP zoning #units Photo # 1 not available 18170 1002010525 266060021 16 A 12 1 1 not available 18170 1016014600 267380010 113 A 15 2 1 not available 18170 1009013300 266980031 20 A 15 3 1 not available 18170 1009013270 266980791 1 A 10 4 1 not available 18170 1009014800 267000997 6 (H)A-87 100 5 1 not available 18170 1009015700 267000252 5 A 10 6 1 not available 18170 1016015300 267390052 49 A 20 7 1 not available 18170 1016015400 267390053 57 A 12 8 1 not available 18170 1004003750 266100085 11 A 25 9 1 not available 18170 1004004500 266100178 43 A 24 10 1 not available 18170 1004001904 266100072 3 A-4 12 11 1 not available 18170 1016419950 267390014 3 A 20 12 1 not available 18170 1009003800 266970267 11 EP 15 13 1 not available 18170 1004009300 266090110 2 A 12 14 1 not available 18170 1013003600 266970013 3 EP 40 15 1 not available 18170 1013004900 266980020 14 A-1 20 16 1 not available 18170 1013009050 266990070 100 A 80 17 1 not available 18170 1013009110 266990079 2 A 50 18 1 not available. 18170 1013009900 265990071 2 RHI[H]RFI 25 19 1 not available 18170 1009004110 266970049 58 A 24 20 1 not available 18170 1014007300 267090008 0.5 RH 10 21 2 not available 18170 1012023600 267190027 10 A 8 22 2 not available 18170 1012025600 267190009 10 A-1 25 23 2 not available 18170 1012001500 267180110 8 A 100 24 2 not available 18170 1012021770 267190046 10 A 30 25 2 not available 18170 1015002350 267350060 11 A-1 35 26 2 not available 18170 1008018300 266960030 5 A 85 27 2 not available 18170 1008020500 266960017 16 A-1 30 28 2 not available 18170 1003012350 266110049 4 A 40 29 2 not available 18170 1013022000 267150034 28 A-1 30 30 2 not available 18170 1003014300 266110030 2 A 15 31 2 not available 18170 1002008700 266060079 20 A 100 32 2 not available 18170 1002009400 266060355 50 A 15 33 2 not available 18170 1002009300 266060074 10 A 25 34 2 not available 18170 1003004700 266120035 3 A 15 35 2 not available 18170 1008004304 266930014 10 A 12 36 2 not available 18170 1008020800 266960001 2 A-1 25 37 3 Ell[] Inventory of RV Storaee Lands in Clarineton - Reoort Version 2 [continued # of RV units Visible in Lot MOC Aerial Size MOC View Photos Ward Address ARN PIN Acres OP Zoninse #units Photo # 3 not available 18170 3006020100 267310007 10 A & EP 8 8 38 3 not available 18170 3006020000 267310006 58 EP # 10 39 3 not available 18170 1011006100 267200181 133 A-1 50 40 This property intentionally deleted 41 3 not available 18170 1001000500 269350015 9 R2-16 50 42 4 not avaiiable 18170 3003020900 266670013 2 A-1 5 43 4 not available 18170 3008011900 266810047 101 A & EP 200 44 4 not available 18170 3005001300 266820036 73 A & EP 12 45 4 not available 18170 3007007100 267300066 16 A # 150 46 4 not available 18170 3006000102 267230053 2 A 12 47 4 not available 18170 3005015601 266860045 29 A 12 48 4 not available 18170 3006013700 267310048 104 EP & NL 12 49 4 not available 18170 3005025901 267250015 4 A-1 50 50 Total number of RVs & Boats visible in attached 50 Aerial View Photographs * 1700 * Note: 50 aerial view photographs provided by Municipality of Clarington website 3 EIE❑ Property Search Map • s• Vin• ? a ` an 201 1 1212912020, 11:48:17 AM Ownership Parcels t. Assessment Parcels 0 Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 [South of Oak Ridges Moraine] Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets F —1 Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 1:2.257 0 0-02 0-04 0-07 nr 0 0-03 0A5 0,12 km 202 + ' I Im I ' m Pow by G Fav 5i swims k.. hkmi p r of ria o WAC and As waar� N .ga grad. veal a Plra d Swralr.. d TFatre E�ertme Int. ar.d es aypfri M Wires wwwd Ha a Pbe d Suer. Ia—Paep at cW_V ee JANECO ry of Cloino a D WAC am ft s ppirs. N Ito" tegv w Not a 9W of Survey . r;Te" Emwprse h.c aro as s. W pbWS. N f.01S le5er%,M Not a P.r. Of Surrey f 2= oW*W %3 j *V wM dad Property Search Map T' Ik I%.. A6 v e K � •� I � 4 f: A ol. A� Age 4A A ry • _ 4..F IL 4. rte. L� ` � �, � � .•rt�. 1212912020. 11:51:00 AAA Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels L. Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning Sy -Law 84-53 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 1:4,514 0 0-04 0-07 0.15M 0 0-05 0-1 02 km 2= CkMgplmQaplq• - -1 1 by o Fat erre Sak*va &�. V rr Cb&q%NL O UPAC ad 19 *VFWM N f0ft +trrrbp. NO a PIM d Slawy_ Q Ta4,M ElMrpr- hC aM bf aupp&w& N ri" aaaawd- Nor a Rm d SurNw. Property Search Map 1' O. T-4 f : } "C 6 a • � i 1�� v 12129r2020. 12:25:36 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels 1 Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets —� Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points ki 3 EEII:1 r� 1:2,257 0 0-02 0-04 0-07 in ❑ ❑M 0.08 0, 12 km 2M Onr*PPO VrMft Prate M O FV% Base Sahfi r Inc_ Mwwpaky d CW -0m. S wAC ane is wWlam AM .fs oemw e. W a Ran Of swn . c Termer Fnklmpme inr- ane a %ppht A I rgw rasmod. " a Pun d S rey- Property Search Map 4 r N 04W loft. 46 r iw X A . 12129/2020,12:2823 PM 1= _- Ownership Parcels 0 001 0 02 mi L-- Assessment Parcels 0 0,01 0.01 0.03 km Zoning By -Law 2005.109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) C Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession — 1 Urban Areas and Hamlets r-1 Municipal Boundary Roads 6 Address Points° vob.d by c F.0 s..' S91u14rw `n. ar . a spuC ora � �ra+aaars AA +tea 4 r"wred. MCI a PLaw d Srrrlfr C Terawn Erampree hrc. am ft supgAm M mom r arae N% a Plan d su rev �a,+c�alrtr d C+a*rgix+ U.'"Opawy d ckwoan. PJ Wkc ave a wpp4ers Al rota mewled Na a pun of Surrey. ! Tenw. . EZ *&;m Inc awe Ra aepWs M rota raserwd Mn1 a >iond &wady 2= RmQplqWqrapny p ,6W 3 1❑ ti r�e Property Search Map ..,y • t t- V - • - �,,• '; •�7,��'' " ! •CCS r lk r •11 � _ � _ . i A Ai A If 1212912020,12:3012 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 {Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Morainel Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Munclpal Boundary Roads Address Points r' 4� F a �T• r - Air 1.2.257 0.02 O.D4 o.07 mi 0 0-03 0-D6 OA2 ium 3 1❑ 2WO OnhoPhoW7whry ww.Cle4 by C FWV Sane Sa "M Tc.. of Clary _ C MPAG ane es AN nye aaaarYed Nal a Fifa Of SLFV".- G TefarV Eadrpae h� and its supphom As r W Leser ed. !dot a Ply, of su"V y Property Search Map 12129(2020, 1232:21 PM 1:1,128 Ownership Parcels 0 0.01 0.05 4 63 m Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Road-, Address Points 0 0.47 0.03 0.06 km .. . — , - nrLtir�i Ktx- w tilt of CWrrgw. e; MPAC am 4s suavr� AL rgtft se —; Np a Pian oe Swwy . CT� W E+avrpn enc and As suppd r AF. r" reserved Net a Peter of Sorry I MW OrCiotl�aaepaa++1• �u1drs7 3 EEII:1 2= 01 MWOmprft" Pvrtdad by O FM Sam Solo Yec . Yuno{r(y d Gladrp O W'RZ and as ft*0Ws. " rrpec neawwd. Not: PM of P v.. o TOWW EMS pr MG. wd 4S WIW&— "90ft rrad Noe a F%w-dsun". .. . — , - nrLtir�i Ktx- w tilt of CWrrgw. e; MPAC am 4s suavr� AL rgtft se —; Np a Pian oe Swwy . CT� W E+avrpn enc and As suppd r AF. r" reserved Net a Peter of Sorry I MW OrCiotl�aaepaa++1• �u1drs7 3 EEII:1 Property Search Map 1212912020, 12:35:33 PM 11,128 I_- Ownership Paroels ❑ ❑.❑1 ❑.❑1 ❑-❑3 m. L� Assessment Parcels ❑ 0-01 0.03 0-06 km 0 Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets F —1 Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points MO7 ann qrg powaA °'' c.°5 ease sw�ho n a _ . uuniac•pL;y a' C+arr�pon. 4 QAC a.W is Su�Rrs Ab ..�iG ro rree. Not a Pw of Suwy-. D Trane Ergs rvr tYc a,d ft s{rvvarers 'U "mxerwd NoraArrdSrm!?. Wen-apsrry a! L9a -f— k%x.uq^ ad Clwvjn. D WAC and 4 sus All r.,a rese—ed Nor a Plan o1 SU -V).. 6 TWWO Eraerprae k� a -d as s pOr . All n" reser d Nd a Plan of Swv" 12020 0rVx4ftWgnw y pawed 3 ED❑ Property Search Map 1212912020, 12:37:54 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2p05-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points C� • 3 =❑ 1:1.128 0 0-01 0.01 0 0.01 0.03 0-03 mi 0.05 km 2020 GdhoW.WWSOhy Pa -d1 &10 Frac ease Sak0OWK au- MWWvsky d OWhV e. C WAC and R UWFWM N an- ew na9- tw a F% n d SurwF. O ne 45 Tanwal a ise Wt a suvO Js. N np" nMermot MCI a Pig d,*}awry- Property Search Map V. n t 4 r }'. ►' �., :� � - ��,�,��' �- max;- �• ' r 10 r 1 ll 1. �� k �{. r. �' '� � v� �7•�'. i " 5� 1' � 10, •� r ;. ,may. � _� AiA— r 1,� _ 11,, �� +, � � •'r+' 'iilax�� y=i�►�c:�aC;�-' •�:•.s�.�.sl.fiiA�liorL��ri: :i� i 212912020. 12,40:12 PM 1:1,128 Ownership Parcels o 0.01 u.o1 o.os m ��. Assessment Parcels 0 0.01 0-03 0-06 km C Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 t5outh of Oak Ridges Moraine] Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal boundary Roads 9 Address Points 2'Z° °''°a'°'°v '° b'° br °„ ftin Mc Wwrwpal�r d Cdri�orL O ■RFL sd IK xppFns. W rqt� ,.,er..d. Md s PWM d s rvw_ a TOWW la"F.se krc m as S+ppirs. Ali'va-emwWd MolaP�d5vr� 0-02" dcWW-WI n WWQJ p of MWMW R,0NWACAW fta fta w r t,a Twee %W a Pian OF Sin 5. c 7varer ErSffrmr trm Ono c �OO� wi rvn �W Pmr d& W 12M orftv+vag" vvn*[C 3 =❑ Property Search Map r � ' 12/29/2020. 12:42A5 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 [Oak Ridges Moraine] r I._ Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession 1 Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 3 EEII:1 1:2.257 0 0-02 0-04 0 0-03 0-06 0-07 mi 0-12 km 2= fl afufid� . by O Fral 6n Sukftm kc.- of ow+pwf. O YP►C and ft frets AN +loft foomw dL I" a Pken of SumW_ o Tomrot Eft- kf and � uopfim Ak tgti t fnwred- Mot a Pnn d 5UNW_ Property Search Map 1212912020. 12.43.41 PM �_. Ownership Parcels C Assessment Parcels C Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-53 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession —_� Urban Areas and Hamlets �1 Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 1.1.128 0 0.01 0.01 0 0.01 0.03 0.03 In 4.06 kn. ZQ,?o praneeu by C Fret Etre sogsrdto kc. wkmwwm Rr at omnvttn. C LPAC and a rmp�ac An ngtas r@WV W Moe s Plan d SL"" . C Ttranet E�Wg eye be aW M5 u4x* 's M ""'eserma. Mol a Fun a[ Slarty. Of cw-;P— W.mxRrdCIw-plm.0 MPAC ara Oe wppk rs AN ram ,ew..S Nvi a Pian of Srcrey. . C Teraner Erse Im and as s Vphv M nVhr- resarrva So a Fir. o} Surer 2W OT9PGV, a&I-We 3 �❑ Property Search Map 00 may= y -mow- ' 12/2912020, 12:45:24 PSA 1:1,128 Ownership Parcels 0 0.01 0.01 OW m Assessment Parcels 0 0.01 0.03 0-D6 km <—� Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets �T7 Municipal Boundary Roads 12 Address Points zoo 0~wWW§W°► t by 0 rv$I Rome `i kr-. M of [7Wpn, O WAC and 4 Bibi. N Asti w•arrad. Not a Piles d &A vog, C Taoanat E - Inc and ft ay¢ri M noaa omm`ad- Not a PYn d SumM- 3 EEII:1 Property Search Map • sir , - ti psi k c� ` • . { E Jim 0 ++ 1 . .20 - AW- } " } �R Its- 12/29/202or 12:5520 PM 1:2,257 Ownership Parcels 0 0.02 0.04 0-07 mi C Assessment Parcels 0 0.03 0.06 0,12 km C! Zoning By -Law 2005.109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) C Zoning By -Law 94-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads ° Address Points M20 Ovv* pJ ogra^ Pronged er a Fffm ease sokAe Inc 13 qtr of C+ .VW. C, MPwC ane is aXq>._ Ni r$r reaarred Nd a Plan d &^f.- C Temw Eroagw ae Inc and is srppNers. M n" mes� NO a Plan of S�. lVk .W*II* of CU-0- thEdopft &chwWook 0 Whc a+d 4s Rvol AP rvft reseN*6 Noe a Pian d S—V Tma Erasprae Inc and e9 srppb9 At r.gnn reserved NN a PW of Srs. 12020 OrinOphdog — VvndeC 3 EEII:1 Property Search Map vr i ti ar_ f � •. , 4` lam. •�' /��, ' r� ;,i ' � y "� y lee� � }� , � •,. •ir ��at�.r ter.., 7�,.. 1212912020,12:57:18 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 3 EEII:1 1:1,128 0 0-01 0.01 0 0.01 0.03 0-03 mi 4.06 km 2620 OdhophomqFa^ Pfd by C Fest Base Solos 1r .. M,nopaldy of Cb WQM, P IMPAC and Rs svPoi AN r" reserved 140 a F%n al Ssvey. . £ Taanat Cr#erpnse he ano ih supvbM AN rrptft reserved Nw a Pion of Swrey Property Search Map 1712912020, 12:59:25 PM 1:2.257 6 Ownership Parcels 0 .02 O.I 0.07 m Assessment Parcels L� Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) C Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets —� Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 5 0.03 0.06 0.12 km 2020 provided by G Frac Base Sdrnr 1� WmmopaWy d QarrgWn. C IMPAC and Ra awcwxs " iVg h reser ed " a PWn d surrey.. O Teriew Erftrvx me and ds supple r Aa n" reserrad No a Plan ti Survey M--*aw of drr+pcn Ididpdkral CbwkiMm OMPAC and es m4Vdefs np rgh15 reserved Na a Pfau d $—my . F ierane[ Enlerprre lm ariaW sappli r. Al ryhM reserved Np1 a Pon or Surrey 12921 OrVXK*K*09r6PI y provided 3 �❑ 12J29/2020, 1:01:10 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2065-109 (Oak Ridges !Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 {South of Oak Ridges Moraine] Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads c Address Points 16 3 EEII:1 1:2,257 ❑ 0.02 0-04 0-07 mi 0 0.03 0.06 0.12 km 2VO D&nph"Why hooded by C Fisc Base Sdubom ru.- of OWNVh.n. C NPAC and a sins AN nOft reserved. Hot a Plan of Sesser - C Terarm E dwpr,ee We. ar,d 6 s6vom K r9rds oasery 7- W a PYn Be Swrey. Property Search Map 1 212 91202 0. 1:02:59 PM Ownership Parcels � Assessment Paroels 0 Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession —_� Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads 17 Address Points 1:4,514 0 0.04 0-07 0 0.05 0.1 02 km 0.15 mi 2020 Orthnphotemyaphy pn]rided by C Fast 8t Sohftx NIX.. AWn.Cfiahh of cLw gmn. C MPAC do a5 SLPPbem AN rKjTS' +eser ed Nat a PWa of Sw v -'y Terarw CSP +e k-. and d. 56pp6v AN nghm reserved Nm a Pw+d Survey Muni• ON Cyannplon MATY d Crar�. C MPAC ane is Suppliers AN rgnts msec. Nm a Plan of &—y.. & Teranet Enc rpac Inc ane is suppW.s An e%V*s,e Led Not a Plan of 5�x 12020 OMcpe�y prw.ded 3 EEII:1 Property Search Map 12129/2020. 1=44:44 PM 1:1.128 Ownership Parcels 0 0.01 0.01 0.G3 rni Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) LJ Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads 18 Address Points 3 EEII:1 0 0.01 0.03 0.06 krn 2M IMhopholoWnphy pro. Adi by E FrrM Base Soibxn Inc.. Mmuopaily d Cearrgla+. C 4PAC and es supp`e A.1 rests ressvw. Not a Plan N Sw Y.. C Team Enkgw-se kc aro a sLOpbe . M op,es rcs"%*1 Hol a Pkm of Svc v Property Search Map Aon 14 d , r *A• Im ri 12/29/2020, 1:09:26 PM 1:1,128 Ownership Parcels 0 0.01 0.01 0.03 mi Assessment Parcels 0 0-01 0-03 0-06 Ian Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession !Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads 19 Address Points 2M orThophot 7why wvAkd M e F"u Base SaMtio &c.- PMy d Ckam". C hPAC and d: wpipb�. As n*is rawved. NW a PWn at Surrey.. C Teranot +se tic ad is srVoi . A/ rgm ravened. Hel a Phan dSurrey Property Search Map 1212912020, 1--50:19 PM Ownership Parcels CAssessment Parcels C Zoning By -Law 2605-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) E Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary -- Roads Address Points 20 1 .2,257 0 0.02 0-04 0-07 mi 0 0,03 0.06 0-12 km 2020 DMxPf Dt0gVny MVA: ad by O FWA Base SokA ow. Mu-arp," or Crannglm. C IAPAC and tft &uDDWm Am n" lasered Nd a Plan of Sauey-, m Tera st Entwpre hoc. and rts Saophers Aa r9t a reaarved KA a Fon Of SLFWy f+aaop IV d WidpaYly dfCWnrX$xi,,t MPAC and rts supply AY rghN reserved NW a Plan M Suver . C Tganaf Erderpf Im ana as 5upph.ms Ali r Vft reserved rdM a Plan of Surly 120M OMapApYgrapMy prontled 3 EEII:1 Property Search Map 12129/2020,1:54:23 PM 1:664 a Ownership Parcels o o.a1 o.aa mi Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2D05-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 [South of Oak Ridges Moraine] Lot and Concession —_ Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads 21 Address Points 3 =❑ 0 0.01 0.01 0.03 km 2020 OMMO WWoo y Mundsd by C PM Bese Sai"a VC., Mwwashty of Gruppo. G ■PAC and its tea. AN %ft reserved. Noe a Pen d Survey_ O TWArM BGNFNM k� and ft a. Vom. AM r&ft reserved. Not a Plan d vry. Property Search Map 1212912020, 1:56:19 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) C Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession —_� Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads e 1:2,257 0 0.02 0.04 6.07 mi 0 0.03 0-06 0-12 km ° Address Points W020 OnN. ompraany prOneee M 0 Fret easy SokAm iX.. MumppalEy of Ckr.. , a MPAC and as suppers. AN CWM �ezp.rM Nal a Wan of Svwy. Q Te aw Efavwi We rd is wpNu An rgnffi MMVVW. Nd a Pyo of Sr," Homy Ot Cea-.91a YrYoiply d damn, C MPAC &Z ds SaWi A9 r-" peserved NOL a Plan o! Svrey., 0 Teraeet Fsaarpri bf - ane a sapprrs AN r,pts wwved Not a Pyo of Surrey 12M 0,0-xA 4upmvhy prwOw 3 =❑ Property Search Map f �• • `• -fir' I '`� -0 12/29f2020,2:0212 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 200 5- 109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) C Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads 0) 1:2,257 0 0-02 0-04 0.07 mi 0 0.03 0-06 0.12 km Address Paints 2= Ora ~ by e FnI ease Sak& s r•c.. May 01 CAarnVeun. G+ MPAC Wd 95 ftpp s- AN ri" reae+ved No, a Plan or Srxrey.. 7^ 7ararwl ErAerpriaa Inc. and im supDhd Ay n" reserved. Not a Plan Of Srnrry. Md VAuri*dIy of Clanngm , C, IAPAC and rts suvol AA, rrdnts reserved Nat a Ptah of Surrey.. © Tlranal ErAerp me Inc. and es r vbsct. At aphis reserved Na a PL9 or Svrer. i 2f?217 Cr0x#K*egrap+y ve.rdad 3 =❑ Property Search Map r "A 4W& • r iv y. * r . Ilk ' 1212512020, 2:55:52 PM 1:2,257 _. Ownership Parcels o o.o� 0.0a 0.07 mi Assessment Parcels 0 0"03 0.06 0-12 km E Z.-ing By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) �i Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets _—� Municipal Boundary Roads • liddfe55 Points 2024 Orthpphptpgraphy protides by EI Fist Base adulwne Inc.. 24 Flumcrpality of Clarington, ID MPAC and its a ppders. Ah rights reserved. Not a Plan of stir y„ ne ® Teral Enlerpnse Inc. and As suppliers. M rights reserved. No, a Plan of Survey. M urtica palily of Claringlon Municipality of Ot rmglon- ® MPAC end its suppliers. All nghts reserved. Not a Pian nl Survey., m Tefanel Enterprise Inc. and its suppliers. All f.g hts rescued. Not a Plan of Survey. 12020 Orlhophutog raphy provided 3 =❑ A �+ r # • A% • 1 Property Search Map - g.. t y H r • " kW T r•� r 4P,r f` 1212912020, 2:11:49 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels I Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) >—� Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession I_! Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 25 3 FM❑ A 1:2,257 0 0.02 0.04 0,07 mi 0 0-03 006 0-12 km 2020 Wky pr 7 by C FesI Oase So t*m Inc.. MwPcpaMy at CW gvm, C MPAC and 6a uppkvs. AN nghft n5ser"o NO a Ran of Surly.- C Terano Ereerpr kw and as wpphm AN rg1Ks rasenod. $lo a Pl n of Swvcry hIw. . Property Search Map Or r 12/29/2020, 2:14:11 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets —� Municipal Boundary Roads 0) A 4 1: 1:2,257 G 0.02 0.04 0 0-03 0-06 0-07 mi _L� 0-12 km ° Address Points 2020 arihaphaag+phy pwiMd by c Fret BMW `'-`d bw . Morn W% d CW:om- O WAC and is st404 A/ tights reWV W Hal a Po Cr swvey, . D Terwra CnWproe bre. irrC 96 supph .. A9 noy. Fe5@r.W Hoi a PCWa of Survey Munx.pamv M parngtw Muncp" d Chvngton. 0 MPAC and its Supp69rs AP rghts reserved Nor a Plan d Sw . E Te,aW E.Wpr Im w4 as pA)p`ers AN ripen reserved Hpl a Pon d Surwy 12020 Onhovhawprwhy prawsw 3 =❑ Property Search Map 10 y i M IW .r Aj,%e 41 N µ } IV . A : l 'y r 9212912020, 2:19:21 PM 1:2.257 Ownership Parcels o 0.02 o.oa 0.97 mi Assessment Parcels v 0-03 0.06 R -I? krn Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) L—� Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads 27 Address Points 2=0 0ff.Whe,WMPhy W000d M e F99 Baae sdttinns kc. MWOOPWy CO CW#glon- 8 WAC and as wpOr AN P" reserved. Not a Plan or Saver• 4 TeranM Enerpnse inc. ane Rs uWohere. M nQW repened. Ttd a Pian of rx e - Property Search Map 1212912020, 2:25-37 PM 1:2.257 Ownership Parcels L Assessment Parcels C Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) t[� Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets —� Municipal Boundary Roads 28 Address Points 0 0.02 0.04 0.07 mi 0 0.03 0.05 0.12 km 2020 UtMpfiotnoa^ pmv~ by 8 Faal Base s kAR me M-WVaW of CWWgbn, C MPAC and 4s suppeers Aq y+ts .neved Nal a P%. of su my.. C Tarwrar CnWp— In[ ane b wpWws Al rgpft rowvad. Nal a P�w or Sk . Y May or CU -V b- Uafteftgr dCl kVW 0WAC and ds supp� All rgras reserved Nor a Plan of Survey., G Temno Enreryrse Inc and is suppbe . N nghcs vlm sd Not a Plan d Surrey. 12020 aOmphok pra^F pravrded 3 EEII:1 Property Search Map r' 0Z, ,. r 1'• sl � �fte. '� •'r� +� w! ♦ i ofj T ! _ r r t � ti pA _3 { i F •, JK iLA r R.r1l ? +' 12/2912020. 2:28.19 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession L Urban Areas and Hamlets Y—� Municipal Boundary Roads 29 Address Points 3 EEII:1 /.. 0 1.1,128 0 0.01 0.01 0.03 mi I,,—.f - I 0 4-01 0.'03 0.06 km M0 orlfKONVOWAntly Grrr'rde0 In C Fry ease SOK&*M Wt . w,r.� of clarWGM, o MPRs and ie suppliers As rrpvis reserved. Nal a Plan d storey. C Lefwrel frterpr We ad +G suppeers M r-Wft reserved Wpt r Plan of Survey Property Search Map 12J2912020, 236:06 PM 1:2,257 Ownership Parcels C Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets —� Municipal Boundary Roads ° Address Points 30 0 0.02 0.04 0.07 mi 0 0.03 0.06 0. 12 km 2021 omwohaftw ily Yrcvi . by C Fr t Base sok*m Inc.. Muracpaky of Ciri qkn C 4PFC and ifs suppYms. Al rQft resarad. Not a Ptvn of Surray.. G TswM! EnWrpr kn and Rs S%gPWs AA .teas nmervad " a Plan of Sunray M&KpaMy or CWr Qton 6pr>KvaW of Cor qWn. C] MPAC and as suppliers AU ngfft rewired. Not a Plap of Survey Teranec ENerpr Inc and es suppkem All ngtK reserrea Npl a Plan of $grey. i ?= Orthpphpk oroptry pr vKW 3 EEII:1 Property Search Map 1212912020, 2:40:47 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 31 1:1.128 0 0.01 0.01 0.03 M1 0 0.01 0-03 0.06 km 2020 0Anoph0loOq ^ rwoyged by G F -V am SokA+xrs Lnc- Mwo pakty of CAwwQm, C WAC and is a*pkars. AN rids mserved Mal a Mon of Surrey.. L ierWet Enkwprae Inc and ds m ppkals. AN rplft nserred- Nat a PhW d SarvCy. i 10� �� R� ' �{ � taw vl • � s _ ��•' � ate.. 12129!2020, 2:43:55 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels C Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning ay -Law 84-83 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession — Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary 01 0) Roads 1 A,514 0 0.04 0.07 0.15 rn7 0 0.05 0.1 0.2Ivn ° Address Paints 2020 orsrnW ,dphy pvmw 4y v 5M sam sdit n rc.. MwKVatay of C4a—qWn" G MPAC and K tis. OW riRha reserved Not a Plan of Survey.. C Twaret Efdwpm Mc. and ds 5%Wpkers AM ngrti reserved No a Plan of Survey M-aupx* or Clar.glpn Mlrnc>paly Cr Clamgtan. 0? NAPA(; and 45 S pphe AS r" reserved Noe a Plan Of Swey " � Tenanat Erle vp Inc and rm supp6a At * go% rase -W No a Plan of Svney 12020 ❑nlldpapl "ft prQvK 0 3 ED❑ Property Search Map 1212912020. 2:45:01 PM 1:4,514 Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 [South of Oak Ridges Moraine] .J Lot and Concession —_; Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads 33 Address Points 3 ED❑ 0 D.04 0.07 0.15 mi 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km 2020 onl4pr appy penrA[r1 by G FV base scks� nc.. M4e+uwwty of Gannpan. ® WAC and ft wpgl.en M nods served "a Plan of surrey.. D Tool &deep(rye I— and is supphers rm ryh15 r�. Hpt a PkM d Surrey. Property Search Map 1212912020, 2A6:04 PM 12,257 Ownership Parcels 0 0.02 0.04 0.07 mi i �, . I Assessment Parcels a 0-03 0-06 n.12 km Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession —_� Urban Areas and Hamlets r _ Municipal Boundary Roads 34 ° Address Points 2020 *W P—dee by c F" Bae soe,enm tni M—wally A Curegmn, C MPAC ar 3 as supO6 M " rem"ad Not a Plan of survey.- ° Teranei Enaspn hx. ann •s suppW" A9 ngh6 ,e5[ ved Hot a Pun d &W -v. Mua �a.y of Carrgion, C MPAC ann m supe a s. AN rgh[s rese ved Hot a P an of S uvey . C Te ane En a pr .e Inc " es sWphre Al }es reser %4 Hata Plan of Swvey • 2U2i1 O Ggpt.�gapM p ovdM 3 �� Property Search Map ' w f• t f '� ..p a. - y 4 v 1 •L yy F 12129/2020. 2:50AB PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels L1 Zoning By -Law 2005-109 [Oak Ridges Moraine] U Zoning By -Law 94-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession _ Urban Areas and Hamlets —� Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 35 3 ED❑ 1:2,257 0 0.02 0.04 0.07 mi 0 0.03 0-06 0.12 km = wry pr%FKW by C Frac Baas SakMmm krc- b6"n s" of Cbnnglon. C WAC rnd ds wypFass nvwe ,W Na a Pbon of Surey - G Te irwt EAerprrte W� WO Rs s 90All noa.eserwW eta a Plan of Stx y. Property Search Map 00'.P o ,-.,;g r+' 1212512020.2:59:58 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 [South of Oak Ridges Moraine] Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads J'~ 1:1,128 0 0A1 0.07 0.03 mi 0 0.01 0.03 0.061u» ° Address Points 2020 OrthophUtagraphy prowled by 9 Rum Base Sdutians Inc- Mpnrcrpallly of Clanngton. fl MPAC and as suppers. All rights reserved. Na[ a Plan of Survey., 0 ieranel Enlerpnse Inc- and iIs sup ... A71 io% reserved. Not a Plan d Survey. Munmpaky of C ariMgton Municipakty of Clanngton, ® MPAC and its suppliers. All rights reserved- Not a Plan of St y. ®Teranel Enterprise Inc. and its suppllers. All nghis reserved. Not a Plan el Survey. 12020 0nt*ptwography provided 3 �❑ Property Search Map r Ir , f 12/2912020, 2:53:35 PM 11,128 -- Ownership Parcels a o-oi O.oT o-0.3 mi C Assessment Parcels 0 0.01 0.43 0.06 km Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Zoning $y -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession i- Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary - Roads 37 Address Points ='Q OTV m*,MW9 ^ wor td W o F" Base Sdonon: tnc . MwwVaky of Ct -0w . C_ MPAC aro is srnpb V r O is reserree Na a Plan d Sorry.. C Temw>! E.Wrprrx we ane m srgpuers Ax rrgms rcsenxu. +/a a PNn d St.rrr. yof Cbratow Mw.a4)e4ry of Clan Vu . G MPAC eM ns suppwe Alt (.0s reserved. Na[ a Ptah d S. ey . C Te .4 Emerpn 1n and r�, 5%96 rs A7 rgtus reserved Nat a atan of Swvay 12M CFVw0K laprapl7 proridr} 3 Ell[] Property Search Map r 12/2912020.2:54:51 PM Ownership Parcels L_.__i Assessment Parcels 0 Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 [South of Oak Ridges Morainey 0 Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 3 ED❑ =A 1:2.257 0 4-02 0-04 0-07 mi 0 a.os 0906 0.1 Z km zona onh00WkqM^ prnwded ay c rm ease soul inc. M.vnValdy or Clvngmn. a MPAC ane as sgpws AN F -PM mswvad- Not a Plan of Suvey-- C 7pf~ Eroerpn rti and e suppiars. Aa rgrd r•sarved. Na a Plan of Survey Property Search Map 12129/2020.2-156.41 PM 1:4.514 Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels 0 0.04 0.07 0.15 MI 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km —_ Zoning By -Law 2005-109 [Oak Ridges Moraine] C' Zoning By -Law 64-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession ? Urban Areas and Hamlets f —1 Municipal Boundary Roads ° Address Points 2620 Offto"oagapfry wooed 6y o Fest Ma S"ms Im 39 M"wvalrty of cwvbpO . C MPAC and 4s srpphem. A+I oots reserved Nat a PIPs of Serres . 6 Terarret Er#rque Int anC es suppiws. All nots rese-W Not a Pian a Swvey- Murrapakfy 01 Clar»glon %*.Ucq Wy of dao gi E: MPAC arrd r6 srppl— All rrprts reservV Nal a Pian of Sr y . G Teranet EMa pr6 Im and ns sa.�'rp�� A' rg" resarved Na a Pian of So yr 12020 Orttgpharagraphy prat-dw 3 ED❑ Property Search Map l® 1212912020,2:59:55 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 [Oak Ridges Moraine] Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 3 1❑ 1:2,257 0 0.02 0.04 4.07 mi 0 0.03 0.06 0.12 km 2020 o,thopfKAD apny crwrded by C F- s Base Saldgns WK.. ldvnapahty 0 CLvinOYrn, d MPAC and its tea. All rights nnervw NN a Por+ 0r Surrey . C' Teranet Enwpr Im. and ds suppWe All rights reserved Not a Plan or Survey This page intentionally deleted 41 U] Property Search Map 12/2912020, 3:04:25 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-169 [Oak Ridges Moraine] Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession —_� Urban Areas and Hamlets — Municipal Boundary Roads 4 2 ° Address Points 3 �❑ 1:1.128 0 0.01 0.01 0.03 mi 0 0.01 0.03 0.06 km 2= OnhDOWKWWW PUAINW by O Furst Base SoYnv hc.. WkwmPafty CO Clw-�. D WAC aF4 dB WMP s. As rgN$ neferrM. No a Plan of Surrey.. O Teranel Enwprlea Inc. and its SUPP ra- Ana" teaerred. Nd a Pon or sy. ' r H Property Search Map pro,,* Y'T ,pn1 r r1 12129/2020,10T17 PM Ownership Parcels C Assessment Parcels Q Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) C Lot and Concession —_- Urban Areas and Hamlets r �? Municipal Boundary Roads Aq 1:1.128 0 0-01 0-01 0-03 mi 0 0-01 0-03 0.05 km Address Points 2020 OWWONA-Wa^ Pin'+ + by o RV ease soieeons lrc_ Mua[ipMty of CUftVbm, O NPAC and Rs U*PWM M ruts resarvvd. fka a Pon d Suvey.. O Tsannal Er*vpr ere. and Rs snnppWm_ M nahts resemvd Nat a Pkat or Suwy. mw.op fty Of cweom IidC3wwIgWLG NFACad rhmxxg s M rgnts reserved Noe a Plan d Serve. C Teraw En tevpnse Inc and rts swp►ens Al nght reserved Not a PU n of Suet•. 12020 Orlhopnoupraply pnoWded 3 �� Property Search Map 1212612020, 8:16:43 AM 1.9,028 _ Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels U Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of flak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary - Roads 0 0.07 0.15 0.3 mi 0 3.1 0.2 GA km 442020 Orlhophotography provided by O past Sass So{unons Inc Municipality of Claringlon. ® PAPAC end Rs supyhars. All nghls reserved IN ol a Plan of Survey ®Teranel Enterpnse Inc. and As suppliers. All nghts reserved. Not a Plan W Surrey. 6kuniupalny of Cla n ngton M un -v palily of 0adnglon. ® MPAr.. and rts suppliers. All ngh% reserved. Na+ a Plan of Survey., ® Teranst Entarpnse Inc. and ns suppliers. AW nyh[s reserved. Nd a Plan of Survey. i 2620 Onhophotography provided 3 �❑ Property Search Map 12129/2020, 311:24 PM 1:4.514 Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84-63 [South of Oak Ridges Moraine] 0 Lot and Concession _ a Urban Areas and Hamlets 1 Municipal Boundary Roads 45 Address Paints 0 0.D4 O.07 0.15 mi 0 0.05 0.1 02 km 2= Or*mx*obpraphy OVVKW by U Fag[ Base Sdubons Inc. MW.Upalty d CWwgtm. F MPACand as SUPPUers A6 rghM reserved. Npl a Plan d Surrey . C ieranet ErAerpnse Inc and rR sLpphm_ AK rgiMs reserved "a Plan of 5�" I s L r'► Property Search Map 1 212 912 020, 3.14:10 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law a4-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession Urhan Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads r-- r L 1 1,2,257 0 0.02 0.04 0.07 mi 0 0.03 0A6 0.12 km Address Points 2= Of&nphooWaphy per' by 9 RW eaae SckrEorra krc.. WaropaWr of CW.Vm. O MPAC and as appbw%. M riyas raaary. Nor a Fkm d Stymy.. CD Tranal Erywprise Inc and is aupol . Ah rims reserved. Not a Ran or Suray. Mur•apaKyo1CWv0_ Muncpabty of CJareoon. 0 MPAC and U suppliers An nght5 reserved "a Pian of SONY., 0Terarrt Erampr Inc. and ft P43plws. Ak ruts Fsswv C NV a Plan of 5uvw 12020 PmuphvbprA^ wov4 d 3 �❑ Property Search Map 1�" =AWTV v Jr lor ��L 14, 77, z r :r t=l�� 1212912020, 3:17:07 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) Zoning By -Law 84.63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads Address Points 47 1:1.128 0 0.01 0.01 0.03 mi a 0.01 0-03 0,06 til„ MO 0ft00r-*$0Y Pro+rded by C :W5t Base 50whons 1n . fro w paOty of CWnrgbn. ® LPAC and ds nppbem. N n" -__ yed. No a Ren of Sun,", C rrynel Enterpnse fnc aro as UpOWS AM rr" reg7e . NN a PIM of Slrny v Property Search Map Wl t rdf = A 12/2912920, 318:43 PM Ownership Parcels I_ Assessment Parcels Zoning Sy -Law 2005-109 [Oak Ridges Moraine] Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) 0 Lot and Concession l —_� Urban Areas and Hamlets rf- k Municipal Boundary T Roads ASZ 1:2,257 ❑ 0.02 0-04 0.07 rni I—... rte. .I 0 0-03 0-06 0-12 krn Address Points 2020 OM-M-IoWoy pronged by c F�ml Base 50±utians W_.. MuwwaW of C,arw,00n, 0 MPAC and its mvp A*m. Aa nWft reserved. Hae a P%an d Suwy.. O Tervret Enwpr Inc. and its suppmm All rigras reserved. Not a Plan or Survey. m__Wvaey of CW.nWoa hkmkblfr of C wkgmn- m IrtpAc and its suppkiom Al rights reserved Not a Pun of Surrey., C Tefarw Erxerpree Inc and ns suppY . An nghts rexrred Hd a Plan of Surrey ! 2020 Oilhin mgraphy prdrded 3 ED❑ Property Search Map 12129/2020, 3:25:22 PM Ownership Parcels Assessment Parcels Zoning By -Law 2005-109 (Oak Ridges Moraine) L Zoning By -Law 84-63 (South of Oak Ridges Moraine) C Lot and Concession Urban Areas and Hamlets Municipal Boundary Roads ° Address Points v 50 1 r Rd 6 �ce5s�v r 1:1,128 ❑ 0.01 0.01 0.03 mi 0 0-01 0.03 0.06 km 2= OrOKOKN ynWft Pa•cMd by D F"t Buse So"Im - MvicPaNY bt CW WOO. G MPAC OW to WW*rs AM n" "marood- Not a Pen or Suvey-. O Termat Enterp— Inc and ns wAW6 a. N rgtts rewwW. WOt ■ Pen d Survey. December 17, 2020 The Honourable Steve Clark pJ Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing 777 Bay Street, 17th Floor r - Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 a -. Dear Minister Clark: The Regional RE: Response to November 25, 2020 Notice of Motion regarding Municipality of Durham Minister's Zoning Orders (2020-P-30), Our File: D00 Corporate Services Department Council of the Region of Durham, at its meeting held on December 16, Legislative Services 2020, adopted the following recommendations, as amended: 605 Rossland Rd. E. Level 1 "Whereas increasingly applicants are requesting Minister's Zoning PO Box 623 Orders in order to bypass the public planning process and to expedite Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 Canada development projects; and 905-668-7711 Whereas there is no defined MZO process to ensure that the appropriate 1-800-372-1102 Fax: 905-668-9963 technical issues are fully addressed before an MZO is enacted; and durham.ca Whereas Regional Council wishes to ensure that all planning -related Don Beaton, Bcom, M.P.A. decisions affecting lands in the Region of Durham are sound and in the Commissioner of Corporate public interest; Services Now therefore be it resolved that: Durham Region request that the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing define what are matters of Provincial priority for consideration of MZO's; 2. Durham Region request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to clarify when MZOs will (and will not) be used to expedite development, and to clarify what safeguards can and will be put in place to ensure that future land use decisions made by way of an MZO represent good planning and are in the public interest; 3. That the Minister consult with the upper tier municipalities during the consideration of any MZO that affects land in the Region. Since any new development affects Regional infrastructure, (i.e. sewer, water, roads), this consultation with the Region is imperative; 4. That the Minister consider whether the proposal conforms to provincial planning policy and consider whether the proposed If you require this information in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1102 extension 2097. 3 EF1 Page 2 of 3 development would adversely affect any matter of provincial interest set out in Section 2 of the Planning Act; 5. That the Minister consider whether the proposal conforms to Regional planning policy and facilitates uses that advance Provincial and regional priorities; 6. That the Minister consider whether new development permitted by an MZO adversely affects uses in the vicinity of the area; 7. That the Minister assess whether the project is "shovel -ready" and will be constructed in a timely manner. In that regard, the MZO could include a lapsing provision so that if a building permit has not been issued for the proposal within a specified timeframe, the MZO could be repealed; 8. That prior to the issuance of an MZO, the required technical studies have been, or will be, completed to demonstrate there will not be any unacceptable impacts on the natural environment; 9. That prior to the issuance of an MZO, the required technical studies have been, or will be, completed to demonstrate that the Regional infrastructure is sufficient to accommodate the proposal, and where necessary that a development agreement has been executed prior to the enactment of the MZO to secure the necessary infrastructure works and ensure that any fiscal impacts on the Region have been addressed; 10. That the affected municipality/municipalities be reimbursed by the proponent for time spent by municipal staff on the basis that a significant amount of staff time is required to assist affected Councils when considering MZO requests, to compensate for the foregone planning application fee revenue that would otherwise have been collected; and 11. That a copy of this resolution be forwarded to all local area municipalities in Durham Region." Z atplti W cato-Ev Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services RW/tf 3 TFI Page 3 of 3 c: A. Harras, Acting Clerk, Town of Ajax B. Jamieson, Clerk, Township of Brock J. Gallagher, Clerk, Municipality of Clarington M. Medeiros, Clerk, City of Oshawa S. Cassel, Clerk, City of Pickering J.P. Newman, Clerk, Township of Scugog D. Leroux, Clerk, Township of Uxbridge C. Harris, Clerk, Town of Whitby B. Bridgeman, Commissioner of Planning and Economic Development 3 TFI December 17, 2020 The Honourable Steve Clark Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing pa -.j 777 Bay Street, 17th Floor h Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 Dear Minister Clark: The Regional RE: Private Request for a Minister's Zoning Order to Permit a Municipality of Durham Home Hardware Building Centre in the Rural Area at the Southeast Corner of Rundle Road and Regional Highway 2 Corporate Services Department in the Municipality of Clarington (2020-P-25), Our File: D00 Legislative Services Council of the Region of Durham, at its meeting held on December 16, 605 Rossland Rd. E. Level 1 2020, adopted the following motion: PO Box 623 Whitby, ON L1N 6A3 Canada "That Regional Council advise the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing that it supports the use of a Ministers Zoning Order to permit the 905-668-7711 establishment of a Home Hardware BuildingCentre in the rural area at 1-800-372-1102 Fax: 905-668-9963 the south east corner of Rundle Road and Highway 2 in the Municipality of Clarington." durham.ca Don Beaton, BCom, M.P.A. Commissioner of Corporate Services 2 a P1V W aLtaw Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services RW/tf c: J. Gallagher, Clerk, Municipality of Clarington B. Bridgeman, Commissioner of Planning and Economic Development If you require this information in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1102 extension 2097. 3 TFI December 9, 2020 Mayor Foster & Members of Council Municipality of Clarington RE: Neal/Jones Motion to Amend Resolution #C-418-20 On behalf of the more than 200 property owners who collectively own the more than 2,000+ acres outlined in Resolution #C-418-20 and the subject of the Neal/Jones Motion to Amend - Items 13.1 & 13.2 on the Council Meeting Agenda last night, it is my pleasure to express to you a big "Thank you". Please understand we found it difficult to understand how Council could approve the last-minute insertion of the Mayor's amendment to the original Resolution #C-418-20 considered and approved by Council on October 23, 2020. This was done without any notice or consultation with the people represented within the 2,000+ acres. So, we are very pleased to see your unanimous vote in support of the Neal/Jones Motion to Amend Resolution #C-418-20. We understand the Neal/Jones Motion to Amend will withdraw and amend the letter(s) recently sent to the Minister of Municipal Affairs & Housing requesting a provincial review of our collective 2,000 acres for consideration in expanding the Greenbelt to include our lands. Since becoming aware of the letter of request to expand the Greenbelt sent to the Minister on October 27, 2020, we expressed to you through petitions, discussions and meetings with individual Councilors, and delegations to Council our concerns regarding the lack of transparency in this matter. Members of Council listened and you reacted. Again, we thank you for your unanimous decision. On behalf of the 200 property owners in Special Study Area 2, Martha Vandepol Van Belle Flowers - Courtice Location Member of The Garden Centre Group Co-op 3 TF1 DURHAM REGION Wedn 7. Waste 7.1 Addendum to the Works Committee Agenda Council Chambers Regional Headquarters Building 605 Rossland Road East, Whitby , January 6, 2021 Correspondence A) Memorandum dated January 4, 2021 from Susan Siopis, Commissioner of Works, and Gioseph Anello, Director of Waste Management Services, re: Municipality of Clarington Resolution #C-506-20 regarding Energy from Waste -Waste Management Advisory Committee (EFW-WMAC) Motions to Works Committee Recommendation: Receive for Information 9:30 AM Pages 2 - 4 If this information is required in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1102 ext. 2097 Memorandum Date: January 4, 2021 • To: Regional Chair Henry and Members of Works Committee The Regional From: Susan Siopis, P.Eng., Commissioner, Works, and Municipality of Durham Gioseph Anello, M.Eng., P.Eng., PMP, Director, Waste Works Department Management Services Copy: Elaine Baxter-Trahair, Chief Administrative Officer June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk, Municipality of Clarington Subject: Municipality of Clarington Resolution #C-506-20 regarding Energy from Waste -Waste Management Advisory Committee (EFW-WMAC) Motions to Works Committee The recent correspondence from the Municipality of Clarington dated December 17, 2020, regarding the EFW-WMAC Annual Update requests that "...Council of the Municipality of Clarington encourages the Regional Public Works Committee to ensure that full consideration is given to motions brought forward by the EFW-WMAC." This request came following the discussion related to the presentation on the EFW-WMAC activities in 2020 which also listed the motions passeG by the committee. It was suggested that the majority of the motions were disregarded since they were "received for information". The following table demonstrates how each of the motions were actioned. If you require this information in an accessible format, please contact 1-800-372-1102 ext. 3560. 3 2 ®❑ Regional Chair Henry and Members of Works Committee Municipality of Clarington Resolution #C-506-20 regarding EFW-WMAC Motions to Works Committee January 4, 2021 Paae 2 of 3 Motion Action Taken That a special EFW-WMAC meeting be called in the The draft regulation was issued June/July timeframe once staff have received additional October 29, 2020, and a information and direction from the Province, to discuss the presentation was given to the potential impacts on Durham Region regarding Extended Committee on November 24, 2020. Producer Responsibility (EPR), and that potential meeting dates be sent to Committee members for review. That the EFW-WMAC request that staff review Durham The website was updated with links Region's long-term waste management website to ensure all to the documents suggested. necessary and appropriate information, including but not limited to: Durham's current waste programs; what work is being proposed; any financial costs associated with the project; current and past tonnage data, as well as future projections; and, any related staff reports is posted and available to the public, and where possible links to the external websites with a summary That the EFW-WMAC recommends that there be town hall Town Hall meeting was held meetings where the public can provide comments and ask November 5, 2020. questions of Durham Regional waste staff, and that it include at least one real time question and answer period on the Long -Term Waste Management Plan (LTWMP); and that the town hall meetings occur prior to the Plan outline being developed and presented to the Works Committee and Regional Council That the email correspondence and two references from Response sent to Linda Gasser Linda Gasser, dated September 21, 2020, regarding and Committee, November 24, correspondence to September 22, 2020 EFW-WMAC — 2020, and December 11, 2020. further to July 15, 2020 EFW-WMAC discussion re: LTWMP Guiding Principles (GP) correspondence be referred to Works staff for comment and for staff to answer the question of where the evidence is that shows Regional Council endorsed the guiding principles and report back to the Committee. That the Long -Term Waste Management Plan (LTWMP) guiding principles be amended as follows: A. That an additional guiding principle be added as the first Guiding principles amended to principle that states that the priority of the plan is to improve include reduction and reuse. reduction and reuse; and B. That a sixth guiding principle be added to set as a priority The term `toxic load' refers to the the reduction of toxic load on the environment. accumulation of toxins and chemicals in our bodies and is therefore beyond the scope of the LTWMP. (see note below) 3 3 [E❑ Regional Chair Henry and Members of Works Committee Municipality of Clarington Resolution #C-506-20 regarding EFW-WMAC Motions to Works Committee January 4, 2021 Paae 3 of 3 Motion Action Taken That the following list of suggested actions be forwarded to List was forwarded to staff for Works staff during the consideration of the Long -Term consideration. Waste Management Plan (LTWMP): x Clear bag policy x Single use plastics x Increased enforcement x Increased education (including a list of pros and cons for every kind of waste management decision) x Providing details on cost x Benefits of mulching x Setting reduction targets and making those widely known to the public Each of the motions were discussed during the meeting and staff provided input and recommendations. If a motion is passed by the EFW-WMAC members (whether or not it is supported by staff), a recommendation is made to Works Committee. An example of this occurred when the EFW-WMAC passed a motion: "That a sixth guiding principle be added to set as a priority the reduction of toxic load on the environment." Clarification on how this would be translated into an objective, target or action plan was not provided. Further investigation by staff indicated that the term `toxic load' refers to the accumulation of toxins and chemicals in our bodies. This recommendation would be beyond the scope of the Long -Term Waste Management Plan (and the expertise of Works staff). End of Memo Clarbgton MEMO If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 To: Mayor and Members of Council From: Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning and Development Services Date: January 8, 2021 Re: Planning and Development Committee Agenda January 11, 2021 Exemption to Part Lot Control - Items 15.1 and 15.2 At the December 14, 2020, Council Meeting, two by-laws appeared on the agenda for exemption to part lot control. The two by-laws were referred to the January 11, 2021 Planning and Development Committee Meeting. Exemptions to part lot control can only occur if lands are a block in a Registered Plan of Subdivision as prescribed in the Planning Act. The part -lot control provisions of the Planning Act allow a Municipality to pass a by-law to remove or exempt the identified parcel from part -lot control. Such a by-law has the effect of allowing the conveyance of a portion of a lot/block without requiring the approval of the Land Division Committee. The exemption for part lot control does not change the intent of original approval, for example increase densities or add new lots. Procedurally, exemptions to Part Lot Control are approved by the Director of Planning and Development Services, however a by-law must be passed by Council. The by-law is registered on title allowing the conveyance to occur. A staff report is not prepared since the development was previously approved. In the matter of Item 15.1, being proposed By-law 2020 -083, the by-law would exempt Lot 5 of Registered Plan N632 from Part Lot Control creating two new lots in keeping with the zoning by-law requirements with respect to lot area and frontage. Since the lands are within a Registered Plan of Subdivision, the Exemption to Part Lot Control is the appropriate mechanism versus an application to Land Division. The Owner has entered into a Development Agreement with the Municipality and has the made the appropriate payments and posted the appropriate securities. In the matter of Item 15.2 being proposed By-law 2020-089, the By-law would exempt a certain portion of Registered Plan 40M-2614 from Part Lot Control which effects two very small slivers of land. The lands will be transferred to correct a condominium phase boundary and to transfer ownership from one Kaitlin company to another. It does not impact previous approvals, zoning, unit yield for site plan. The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, ON Ll C 3A6 1-800-563-1195 1 Local: 905-623-3379 1 info@clarington.net I www.clarington.net 3 CF] Paae 2 In future, Planning and Development Services will outline the history in the covering memo we provide to the Municipal Clerk when we request the by-law be placed on the Council agenda. The Clerk has indicated that she will include this memo R(fhe Agenda to provide Council with the background on the by-law. Sincerely, Faye Langmaid Acting Director Planning and Development Services /nl 3 [[E❑❑ From: Chambers, Michelle To: Chambers, Michelle Subject: FW: Proposed Development 1465 Hwy 2 Courtice Public Meeting January 11th, 2021 Date: January 6, 20219:19:32 AM From: Suzanne Reiner <sreiner(@start.ca> Sent: January 4, 20219:11 PM To: Mayor Shared Mailbox <mayor(@clarington.net>; Anderson, Granville <GAndersonlcDclarington.net>; Hooper, Ron <rhooper(@clarington.net>; Jones, Janice <JJones CcDclarington.net>; Neal, Joe <JNeal CcDclarington.net>; Traill, Corinna <CTraill(@clarington.net>; Zwart, Margaret <MZwart(@clarington.net>; Morawetz, Mitch <mmorawetz(@clarington.net> Subject: Proposed Development 1465 Hwy 2 Courtice Public Meeting January 11th, 2021 EXTERNAL RE: COPA 2020-0005 AND ZBA 2020-0019 Dear Mayor, Councillors and Mr. Morawetz, I am submitting my comments to be considered at the upcoming Planning and Development Committee Meeting on January 11th, 2021. In 2017, the previous Council amended the official plan to approve a high-density residential development of 464 -units at 1475-1495 Hwy 2 and 11, 13, 15 Darlington Blvd in Courtice. It has been named "The Uplands". It is comprised of: a ten -storey high rise with 126 units, a nine -storey high rise with 102 units, another nine -storey high rise with 151 units, 80 townhouse units and 5 single -detach homes. I am asking Council to please consider that: • Until The Uplands development is completely built and families moved in —the impact from increased traffic from this development onto neighbouring streets will not be known, and will not be reflected accurately in any traffic studies. • Until The Uplands development is completely built and families moved in — decisions made to re -zone is short sighted and premature. Council will not know if the proposed development at 1465 Hwy 2 will be more valued as a commercial property versus a proposed mix -use residential. (Commercial Zoning status as per the Official Plan and Courtice Main Street Community Improvement Plan, and as per our municipal planners' recommendations and adopted by Council). If other development uses for this location is to be considered, additional options should be explored such as a mental health and wellness centre or a low-rise senior residence. The vision of our community should be driven by the Municipality's needs rather than the developer's wants. • Until The Uplands development is completely built and families moved in — until the 3 high-rises and the townhomes frame the 3 [[E❑❑ landscape and tower over Tooley Mills Park and Farewell Creek Trail, Council should not approve amending the zoning to accommodate an additional 177 residential units. Leave 1465 Hwy 2 property zoned commercial. It can always be amended at a time when the needs of Clarington residents are identified and the infrastructure is in place. Please do not add a nine -storey mix -use building and 45 stacked townhouses to this development. 641 units, condensed on Hwy 2 between Darlington Blvd and Prestonvale Road, is not warranted. Sincerely, Suzanne Reiner 35 Darlington Blvd. Courtice ON L1E 2J8 3 FIF] Jeff Kelso 438 Rickard Road Clarington, ON L 1 C 3K5 December 30, 2020 Mayor Foster & Members of Council 73 Temperance Street Bowmanville, ON. LIC 3A6 RE: Recreational Vehicle (R , Storage on Clarington Lands Zoned 'A' and `EP' I respectfully request that this letter, the attached report(s) and the 50 aerial view photographs are all included on the next Council meeting agenda - January 18, 2020. I submit to you the following attachments to this letter: I . Inventory of RV Storage Lands in Clarington Report - Versions 1 & 2. 2. Aerial view photographs of 50 Clarington properties offering Recreational Vehicle storage services. Note: All aerial view photographs contained in this report were provided by the Municipality of Clarington website e -reap gallery which is an interactive mapping interface allowing the general public to search for properties using civic addresses, assessment roil numbers (ARN), property identification numbers (PIN) numbers or road names. Two versions of the report are provided. Report Version 1 - includes the municipal address of each of the 50 properties which appear to be offering RV storage to the 1,700 Recreational Vehicles (RV) which are represented in the attached 50 Clarington properties. Report Version 2 - excludes the municipal address of these same 50 properties. This version has been modified by deleting all municipal addresses of the 50 Clarington properties listed in my report. The exclusion of property addresses provides an alternative for the Clerk should it be necessary to protect the privacy rights of the 50 Clarington property owners listed in my report. However, note Version 2 does include the Assessment Role Number and PIN information, both of which are readily available to the public and utilized within your municipal website property search engine. Both versions of the report do provide: i) The Ward in which each of the 50 properties are located. ii) The number of RVs which appear to be stored on each of the 50 properties. 3 m1-1 iii) The current zoning of each of the 50 properties offering RV storage, as per the current Zoning By-law 84-63 and Zoning By-law 2005-169. iv) The size (in acres) of each property. V) The Property Identification Number (PIN) of each of the 50 properties. vi) The Assessment Role Number (ARN) of each of the 54 properties. My report has identified 50 properties in Clarington which appear to be offering storage to the owners of 1,700 Recreational Vehicle (RV) which are represented in the attached 50 Clarington properties You may be surprised by this number. I suspect this number could very well be higher considering the snapshots of the 50 aerial views (attached) were taken in late April/early May 3020. By that time many RV owners have already picked up their vehicles for the season. The properties in my report are organized by Ward to assist you in identifying which properties are located within your individual Wards. Please understand this letter and the attachments are not intended to be a complaint. I do own an RV storage facility in Clarington. However, you will not find any reference to my property in my report or the 50 aerial view photographs. The purpose of this letter and my report is to simply draw attention to the challenges facing these 50 property owners with respect to our current Zoning By-laws. More importantly to give you a heads up on the potential legal conflicts ahead should you fail to act now. Most, if not all of these 50 Clarington properties, appear to be a `non-compliant use' as defined in our current Zoning By-law 84-63 and Zoning By-law 2005-109. Consequently, all of them are subject to Clarington By-law Enforcement action. I regret to report to you, after having countless discussions and email exchanges with Clarington Planning Staff, your Staff's unwavering position on this topic is "recreational vehicle & boat storage is not permitted in Prime A icultural Land". Yet my report shows 96% of the 50 Clarington properties listed in my report are providing RV storage services from lands designated in the above mentioned zoning by-laws as either 'A' -Agriculture or `EP' Environmental Protection. 96% is not an unrealistic percentage considering these two designations (A & EP) are the two most pxedorninant zoning designations found within our municipality. I understand previous Councils and Staff made attempts to resolve Clarington's shortfall in RV storage facilities. 3 TFIF] However, you only need to look at my report to see Clarington Staff and Council have not been successful in finding a solution to these shortfalls. Avoiding the issue is not the answer. Issuing written notification to 50 property owners to `shutdown' their business and inform more than 1,700 customers they must find RV storage facilities in another community is not the answer. Council must give direction to Planning Staff to take a good hard look at the issue. Find a compromise. Then report back to Council with recommendations and options to resolve our municipal -wide Recreational Vehicle storage issue once and for all. Your duty as a Councillor is to consider the well-being and interests of the municipality. To create jobs, grow our community and our economy. You are responsible for developing and evaluating the policies and programs of the municipality, and determining which services will be provided within our community. You decide whether those services are offered by the municipality, or the private sector; and you decide which services will not be provided within our community. Surely you must agree that RV storage is a necessary service that should be provided within our community. But it is not enough to agree a service should be provided. You must also facilitate the delivery those services, not hindering them. The message "Municipality of Clarington forces 50 businesses to close" is not a good message to be sending anytime, but especially not right now. A better message would be "Municipality of Clarington helps save 50 businesses from closing". I would be pleased to discuss this issue with you at your convenience, and I look forward to being a delegate at your next Council meeting on January 18, 2020. 1 respectfully remain yours truly, Jeff Kelso 905-259-1895 ke 1 so . t all g u.�rr,,gm ail . corn c.c. Clerk, Municipality of Clarington 3 m-1 From: Wendy Cates <uscates(a-gmail.com> Sent: January 7, 2021 3:22 PM To: Anderson, Granville <GAnderson a( clarington.net>; Hooper, Ron <rhooperCa)-clarington.net>; Jones, Janice <JJonesCc)-clarington.net>; Neal, Joe <JNeal (a clarington.net>; Traill, Corinna <CTraill(o)-clarington.net>; Zwart, Margaret <MZwart(a clarington.net>; Morawetz, Mitch <mmorawetz(a clarington.net>; Mayor Shared Mailbox <mayor a clarington.net> Subject: Proposed Development 1465 Hwy 2 Courtice EXTERNAL Dear Council Please accept this email on record for the proposal development meeting on Jan 11,2021. I am formally requesting that council not alter the zoning for this area from commercial to residential/mixed. The previously approved high density development adjacent to this property, known as the uplands, had numerous concerns over the vast number of units from the community prior to approval. Some of these concerns included - number of units=people=cars condensed in such a small space (which I believe council agreed to a lesser number than initially proposed and has already increased this number since approval) - impact with increased traffic on Hwy2. Traffic is very heavy now. Hwy2 intersections at Townline, Darlington, Centrefield and Prestonvale is congested at the best of times now with no plans to alter. Nash road traffic has more than doubled. - current issues with Darlington Blvd/Foxhunt sub streets being used as a through way to townline/Olive is still an issue. -401 access - the ramps at harmony road is already a disaster during rush hour now. I believe council has recently passed a number of new developments throughout Courtice that have yet to be built. Until all of these new builds are completed and our new neighbours moved in, we will not know the true impact this will have. Whether or not our community can effectively accommodate the additional high density units/people/cars, especially within this area, remains to be seen. 3 rn I am strongly suggesting council allow time for our infrastructure and services to meet the demand of these new builds and adjust before altering and rezoning new spaces that deviate from the existing plan. Approving additional high density developments before the completion of the uplands and other approved developments is not only premature but irresponsible. (The prestonvale community and roads still remains a terrible reminder of poor planning.) I am not opposed to new and high density developments. I do question why council is stuffing hundreds of units in an area that does not allow for easy access to and from the 401. 1 would suggest that Courtice road, the new widened Hwy2 and underused hwy418 would serve well to additional traffic and allow for easy access to bus and go train transportation. Once again, I urge council to wait until the true impact of approved builds can be measured accurately before it decides how much density in 1 small area is too much. Sincerely Wendy Cates 10 Darlington Blvd 905 391 9715 Sent from my Phone 3 TFIFI January 6, 2021 To: Clarington Council and Planning & Development Committee Re: Proposed Development at 1465 Highway 2 in Courtice I am writing this letter in response to the Municipality's request for public input regarding applications to amend the Clarington Official Plan November 24, 2020 The Honourable Greg Rickford Minister of Energy, Northern Development & Mines and Minister of Indigenous Affairs Whitney Block, Room 5630 5th Floor, 99 Wellesley St. W. Toronto, ON M7A 1 W 1 Dear Minister Rickford: At its meeting of November 11, 2020, Hamilton City Council approved Item 10 of the General Issues Committee Report 20-018, which reads as follows: 10. Request for an Interim Cap on Gas Plant and Greenhouse Gas Pollution and the Development and Implementation of a Plan to Phase -Out Gas -Fired Electricity Generation (Item 10.2) WHEREAS, the Government of Ontario is planning to increase reliance on gas - I HCHMMJU;P 2 QU JD\/ --fired power plants, which is anticipated to increase greenhouse gas (GHG) pollution by more than 300% by 2025 and by more than 400% by 2040; : ( 5 ( L6 _& DCDMMM SRDXL H L1/_ L40J P RIIH \KD0_G'R)CE(DIAK--I_UMR ViHILP-NW of the world (which is in alignment with climate models and projections impacting northern climates most significantly); WHEREAS, the Province of Ontario will adversely impact more than a third of the greenhouse gas reductions it achieved by phasing -out its dirty coal-fired power plants, due to a power plan built around ramping up gas-fired generation to replace the output of the Pickering Nuclear Station (scheduled to close in 2024); WHEREAS, alternative options are available to reversing short sighted cuts to energy efficiency programs and stop under -investing in this quick to deploy and low-cost resource, which include maximizing our energy efficiency efforts by paying up to the same price per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for energy efficiency measures as we are currently paying for power from nuclear plants (e.g., up to 9.5 cents per kWh); WHEREAS, the Province of Ontario should continue to support renewable energy projects that have costs that are below what we are paying for nuclear power and work with communities to make the most of these economic opportunities; WHEREAS, the Province of Ontario has alternative options to increasing gas - I Z WH3 LRYICFHLR A XI-EHFVLR I Fwd FFLIM_9Z - cost 24/7 power from its water powered reservoir system as a possible alternative; 3 rn Cap on Gas Plant and Greenhouse Gas Pollution Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, a fossil -free electricity system is FUffDDTLP SRl.V6CM-FDP 0VDVT efforts to reduce GHG emissions by replacing fossil fuel use with electric vehicles, electric buses, electric heat pumps, and other steps dependent on a fossil -free electricity supply; and, WHEREAS, our staff have noted this problem in their report on Updated Timelines and SMART Corporate Goals and Areas of Focus for Climate 0 I]W D QG I: IC-DSWuFQ-Z KRH40-lFZ DL040 '8 QDKMV1H1319MCFHFI 12 QDLUR FI]QJ VJ XI- MSS0B LC 1VM/1 HC�SHF\NGiM\XIIDI gas, a n d therefore GHG emissions, may continue to increase as the nuclear facilities are refurbished and the Province of Ontario further supplements the electricity grid Z LWAQD\k M X 4--n THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: (a) That the City of Hamilton request the Government of Ontario to place an interim cap of 2.5 mega tonnes per year on our gas plant and greenhouse gas pollution and develop and implement a plan to phase-out all gas-fired electricity generation by 2030 to ensure that Ontario meets its climate targets; and, (b) That a copy of this resolution be sent to the Premier of Ontario, to the local 0 3 3 [V[ i[5 HJ LRCM O DMEPDQGO;FDQX DIB XCIFLSDMW-L Therefore, there City of Hamilton respectfully requests your consideration of this matter and looks forward to your response. Sincerely, Fred Eisenberger Mayor Copied: The Honourable Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario Andrea Horwath, Opposition Party Leader, New Democratic Party of Ontario, M.P.P Hamilton Centre Monique Taylor, M.P.P. Hamilton Mountain Paul Miller, M.P.P. Hamilton East -Stoney Creek Donna Skelly, M.P.P. Flamborough-GIan brook Sandy Shaw, M.P.P. Hamilton West-Ancaster-Dundas Region of Waterloo Ontario Municipalities Association of Municipalities of Ontario 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Planning & Development Committee Resolution # Date: January 11, 2021 Moved by: Seconded by: WHEREAS the Municipality of Clarington strives to sustain our environment for future generations and to foster a heathy community that nurtures the wellbeing of residents to provide a high quality of life indefinitely; WHEREAS the Municipality of Clarington declared a Climate Emergency on February 18, 2020, acknowledging the important role of governments in reducing greenhouse gas emissions that are contributing to climate change; WHEREAS the Municipality of Clarington recognizes governments have an important role in reducing the local and global environmental damages associated with the production, transportation and use of energy; WHEREAS the Municipality of Clarington is taking action to mitigate climate change through energy conservation and demand management planning and the development of the Clarington Corporate Climate Action Plan; WHEREAS the Municipality of Clarington has collaborated on the development of the Durham Community Energy Plan, which promotes the transition to low carbon energy to ensure the wellbeing of our community and environment; WHEREAS the Municipality of Clarington recognizes the need for energy expenses to be minimized to alleviate the financial burden on residents, businesses and the municipality; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Municipality of Clarington respectfully requests the Government of Ontario take the following actions to reduce GHG emissions in the energy sector while promoting local economic development: L Prioritize the incorporation of carbon -free energy sources into the Ontario power grid including wind, solar and nuclear; ❑ Invest in local renewable energy production, transmission and storage, to reduce GHG emissions and household energy expenses and create high quality new 3 rn jobs in manufacturing, installation, maintenance, and recycling; Li Introduce programs to incentivize energy retrofits for all buildings, as the single most effective way to reduce energy demand, while encouraging local economic development and jobs in the building sector; Li Introduce programs and incentives to encourage the use of electric vehicles by the public, businesses and municipalities to offset GHG emissions from the transportation sector; AND THAT this resolution be sent to the Honourable Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario; the Honourable Greg Rickford, Minister of Energy, Northern Development and Mines and Minister of Indigenous Affairs; The Honourable Jeff Yurek, Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Lindsey Park, MPP (Durham), David Piccini, MPP (Northumberland -Peterborough South); AND THAT this resolution be sent to the Region of Durham and Durham Area Municipalities; AND THAT this resolution be sent to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) and the Association of Municipalities Ontario (AMO) for circulation to municipalities with a request for endorsement; 3 TFIF] WIN M IMM • Canada Ltd. Sound solutions to acoustical challenges Celebrating over Go years 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25 Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada, L4B iB9 Consulting Acoustical Engineers • Canada Ltd. Soundsolutions to acoustical challenges Celebrating over 6o years A potential solution may be for municipalities, either individually or in groups or via the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, to approach CP for information relevant to each municipality and see if CP will cooperate or refuse the request. If CP will cooperate, each municipality can retain the information, attempt to update it every few years and make it available to developers/consultants similar to what is done for road traffic. It should be noted that attempting to count railway traffic on-site, independently of the railway, similar to counting road traffic, is not considered practicable. Another potential, less satisfactory solution is to universally EmitigationEDV❑ outlined in the GWV HCW11 IQ3Q4JL1RM H❑ZD YHUSP HCWC[3UZdP UVOW15 DOD, C2 SRDNZQ May 2015, for all situations. See below for more information on this guideline. In many cases \ffiVEFRXG:ULNA9AWRYHJNQ that is, mitigation measures that are really not necessary for the particular circumstances and in other cases mitigation measures that may be inadequate. THE RAILWAY GUIDELINES The guideline document referenced above was issued jointly by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) and the Railway Association of Canada (RAC). CP is understood to be a member of RAC and participated in creating the Guidelines document. The Guidelines address noise as well as other aspects, and provide recommendations regarding noise assessment reports, noise mitigation and implementation. Specifically: 61-F1ZCEL111I11�CoQAGU5UEE i -CP +5 DKYD, 701FIDWANDMonsultation with the railway is LP SHONH P LCWWHIlftluency, type and speeds of trains within \NHEFRU KRJ DCS 3SRH=RUWSDGM QRl AUX 0®I I LF1within \NHFRUXRJIE 2. 6 HFURQ ❑[1I1EEC�❑ 6 EFHI_t.IDILOoise is site-specific in nature, the level and impact of noise on a given site should be accurately assessed by a qualified acoustic consultant ❑ FW 3. 6 HFOUE111111mplementation Mechanisms ❑2 EIVIFllflf1-i /3( V1&EQ,/K[D50DUDQGHIHF\&Hii process that ensures consistent application of the Guideline across all jurisdictions in Canada when dealing with new resideQAD09-M-MBP LQDQGFRCM-WRQJ= 4. Appendix A, Section AA.1 1,QMZGq15ZQA/XJJ I-MAASU;SFZVH�- P HaVAA ZX(r&EHAOEIV lFW \R D HYHD'SP HCM LDE OWE\&+ M/P HCW O[EH[GRCHI 3LQFR1/H_FFU /XWQRQ I I I Ll,P6( Wai affec\NG UM D, ELDQGEP X\W\U -i UR_DFFRXQAkNHdRS HDAR _AW LED D, I DFLMdLIV❑ [EIEEP RQl VVYU04M90 V❑ 5. I SSHCGL= ❑6 WVRQiii ❑ [[[iC35 DD a I I HUG I IVB C,IliJ VLP SH DAH V L9 a V aH I IDaO D corridor (or other facility) itself als FFFI❑W PL LPXP, the factors to be considered are: iii. Track speed; V. Current and future estimated usage and growth in patronage (10 year KR1DPLEL 2 Consulting Acoustical Engineers 3 [[E❑❑ • Canada Ltd. Soundsolutions to acoustical challenges Celebrating over 6o years 6. Appendix C, Section ❑&1111111111:�5 HFRP P HMed Procedures for the Preparation of Noise Assessment Reports for New Residential or Other Sensitive Land Uses in Proximity to Railway CorridorsFF-i-ontains item 3 which states �2 E1BL❑EH:LV LU Y11F:Volumes from LDLODELED❑GLAP EE]Iq WD0WIJ1GVID11LFCYFUP �by 2.5% compounded for a minimum ❑❑IEFDA)7X❑®MvCN 1 VD: DYLX@EOIJ- 7. Appendix C, Section AC.1.5 is similar to AC.1.4 except for rail yards and talks of obtaining various information from the railway. It is clear that the FCM/RAC Guidelines fully intend that the railways cooperate and provide relevant information to allow the best possible railway noise assessment in accord with the MOE (now MECP) rail noise analysis techniques and the Guidelines. For some reason CP has chosen to abandon these Guidelines which they helped to formulate. We are hoping that, with the help of municipalities, a resolution to this situation with CP can be found, to continue to allow appropriate noise studies to be done where CP rail corridors or other facilities are involved. In the interim, your suggestions would be welcomed as to how we and other consultants/clients should proceed with railway noise studies involving CP Rail facilities, where railway traffic/operational data are not readily available. If you have any suggestions or questions, please contact Michael Lightstone at 905-764-5223 ext. 232 or solutions(a)valcoustics.com. Yours truly, VALCOUSTICS CANADA LTD. Per: A. D. Liglyfstone, Ph.D., P.Eng., President ADL\tk J:\2020\1200000\500 CP Rail Data\Letters\Noise Studies of CP Railway Operations V1_O.docx 3 Consulting Acoustical Engineers 3 [[E❑❑ Clarington Public Meeting Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: January 11, 2021 Report Number: PDS -001-21 Submitted By: Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning and Development Services File Number: COPA 2020-0005 and ZBA 2020-0019 Resolution#: Report Subject: Applications to amend the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law to allow a nine -storey mixed use building and 45 townhouse units at 1465 Highway 2, Courtice Purpose of Report: The purpose of this report is to provide information to the public and Council. It does not constitute, imply, or request any degree of approval. Recommendations: 1. That Report PSD -001-21 be received; 2. That staff receive and consider comments from the public and Council with respect to the above referenced applications; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report PSD -001-21 and any delegations be DGYLM-bbl zi R❑EF10/i &FUR- IF1 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -001-21 Report Overview Page 2 The Municipality is seeking public input on applications to amend the Clarington Official Plan more specifically the Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law to allow a nine -storey mixed use building and 45 stacked townhouse units situated in five separate blocks at 1465 Highway 2 in Courtice. The nine -storey building is proposed to contain 132 residential units plus 254 square metres of ground related commercial floor space. The site is approximately 1.1 hectares, producing a housing density of approximately 160 units per hectare. The site plan details, and tenure will be addressed through future Site Plan and Plan of Condominium applications. The subject applications have been deemed complete. 1. 1.1 1.2 1.3 Application Details Owner/applicant: 1465 King Street Inc. Agent: Proposal 1.4 Area: 1.5 Location SvN Architects + Planners Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan Amendment To permit townhouses as a component of a mixed-use development, to increase the maximum permitted building height from eight storeys to nine storeys for the mixed-use building and to reduce the private laneway width from 7 metres to 6.5 metres. Zoning By-law 84-63 Amendment TR-LHRCHV&i[SLRSHUWU;P EGeneral Commercial Exception (C1- 39FF,nREH zone appropriate to permit a nine -storey mixed use building containing 132 residential units and 254 square metres of ground related commercial floor space and 45 stacked townhouse units. 1.1 hectares 1465 Highway 2, Courtice 1.6 Roll Numbers: 181701007006400, 181701007006700 and part of 181701007003690 1.7 Within Built Boundary: Yes 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report PDS -001-21 2. Background 2.1 On October 9, 2020, 1465 King Street Inc. submitted applications to amend the Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law 84-63, to permit a nine -storey mixed use building and 45 stacked townhouse units in five separate blocks at 1465 Highway 2 in Courtice. The proposal also includes indoor and outdoor common amenity spaces, as well as enclosed at grade and below grade parking. The mixed-use building contains 132 residential units plus 254 square metres of ground floor related commercial floor space (Building 1) and 45 stacked townhouse units (Buildings 2 to 6). See (Figure 1). Figure 1: Proposed Site Plan 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PDS -001-21 2.2 On October 30, 2020, the applications were deemed complete and circulated to departments and agencies for comments. 2.3 The following studies were submitted in support of the applications: ❑ Planning and Urban Design Rationale ❑ Transportation Impact Study ❑ Environmental Impact Study Addendum ❑ Environmental Noise Feasibility Study ❑ Functional Servicing Report ❑ Stage 1-2 Archaeological Property Assessment ❑ Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ❑ Hydrogeological Study 3. Land Characteristics and Surrounding Uses 3.1 The site, which is vacant, is located on the south side of Regional Highway 2, just east of Darlington Boulevard and Varcoe Road. There is approximately 104 metres of frontage along Highway 2. The site 1.1 hectares. Figure 2 shows the proposed development and surroundings uses. 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North: White Cliffe Terrace Retirement Residence and single detached dwellings fronting onto Cherry Blossom Crescent. East: The Uplands, Courtice development site, comprised of 150 -unit apartment plus 2 condominium buildings of 102 and 126 units. South: The Uplands, Courtice development site comprised of single detached homes fronting onto Darlington Boulevard. West: Oshawa Monument Company, Esso and Circle K with Tim Hortons Express. 3.3 The Official Plan Amendment, Secondary Plan Amendment and Zoning by-law Amendment for The Uplands site was approved in 2018. The Site Plan approval process is underway and nearing completion. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 5 Report PDS -001-21 Courtice Heath Centre n� 5 Esso /Circle K � I _ O U G, E White Cliffe Terrace 0 101 Is X r- < I� 1 Apartment Building - 9 Storey - 132 Units 2 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 14 Units 3 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 6 Units 4 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 10 Units 5 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 10 Units 6 Stacked Townhouses - up to 4 Storeys - 5 Units Figure 2: Location and Surrounding Lands 3 [[E❑❑ Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -001-21 4. Provincial Policy Provincial Policy Statement Page 6 4.1 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) policies direct growth to settlement areas and promote compact development forms. Planning authorities are to facilitate development of a variety of housing forms and promote residential intensification to achieve efficient development patterns, especially along public transit and active transportation routes. 7 KH -GH LAMOIR E[IL:NPoI-VI1LFC\R][ILLIF CPQHA3-M-MP HEM U� UL -1-1 previously developed areas and infill development among other uses. Recent changes to the PPS policies state that planning authorities shall also consider market demands when evaluating proposals. 4.2 The site is located within the settlement area of Courtice, in a place that is to be a focus of growth and development. It is located along a multi -modal transportation corridor. New development is to use existing infrastructure and public services appropriately, KDALJ _U DLG_tR M -i[ 4WV[VL lR❑❑G LJ VL 4.3 The applications conform with the Provincial Policy Statement. Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan) 4.4 The Growth Plan is a long-term planning framework that manages growth, mainly within the urban areas of the Greater Golden Horseshoe. It provides policies to encourage complete communities, which includes a diverse mix of land uses, a mix of employment and housing types, high quality public open spaces, and convenient access to local stores and services. New transit -supportive and pedestrian -friendly developments will be concentrated along existing and future transit routes. The objective is to protect the natural environment and near -urban agricultural lands by making efficient use of existing public infrastructure and encouraging compact development within the already built up areas of the municipality. 4.5 The site is within the defined Built Boundary in Courtice. Some growth is to be accommodated by directing development to the already built up areas of Courtice through intensification. A minimum of 40 percent of all residential development occurring annually within each upper tier municipality will be within built-up areas. After the Durham Region Official Plan comprehensive review is completed, the minimum target will increase to 50 percent. 4.6 The applications conform with the Growth Plan. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -001-21 5. Official Plans Durham Region Official Plan Page 7 5.1 The Durham Region Official Plan designates the subject lands as a Regional Corridor. Regional Highway 2 is a Type B Arterial Road and functions as a transit spine. Regional Corridors are targeted for higher densities and mixed uses, supporting higher order transit services and pedestrian oriented development. Regional Corridors support an overall, long-term density target of at least 60 residential units per gross hectare and a floor -space index of 2.5. The nearby Farewell Creek valley is identified as part of the Natural Heritage system. 5.2 Urban areas across the Region shall be planned to accommodate a minimum 40 percent of all residential development occurring annually through intensification within built-up areas. The Durham Regional Official Plan requires a minimum intensification target of 32 percent for lands within the built boundary in Clarington. 5.3 Transit Spines facilitate inter -regional and inter -municipal transit services along arterial roads (GO Transit) and intersect with local transit services (Durham Regional Transit). Development along Transit Spines shall provide for complimentary higher densities and mixed uses in accordance with the Regional Corridor policies. 5.4 Since the site is along Regional Highway 2, noise impacts from the arterial road must be mitigated in accordance with Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks guidelines. Clarington Official Plan 5.5 The lands are within a Regional Corridor, within which a mixed-use building and apartments are permitted with a height between 3 and 12 storeys, and minimum net density of 85 units per hectare. Proposals for multi -unit residential must consider appropriateness of the site, compatibility, provision of suitable access points, traffic and parking impacts and massing. The urban design and sustainability policies of the Official Plan must be implemented through the development. 5.6 Multiple vehicular accesses shall generally be provided to townhouse and apartment blocks. Each condominium corporation shall have direct street frontage and direct vehicular access. 5.7 Where lands are within 120 metres of a natural heritage or hydrologic feature, an Environmental Impact Study is required. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -001-21 Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan Page 8 5.8 Within the Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan, the lands are designated Commercial. The Commercial designation allows retail, service and office uses, high density residential uses such as mid- and high-rise apartments, either in a single use building or part of a mixed-use building and limited community facilities including social, recreational, educational and cultural facilities. 5.9 The Secondary Plan also identifies a trail system and a network of private lanes to be considered during the review of the applications. These are interconnected with The Uplands development which is adjacent. 5.10 The Secondary Plan provides detailed urban design policies to ensure street -oriented buildings and an attractive streetscape along the Courtice Main Street. Development must meet the needs of pedestrians, cyclists and transit users as well as automobiles. Views and connections to natural heritage features shall be enhanced through the development of this site. 5.11 The proposed amendment to the Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan would allow for limited townhouse development in the Commercial designation, permit a nine storey rather than an eight storey (maximum) building and a reduction in the private laneway width from 7 metres to 6.5 metres. 6. Zoning By-law 6.1 The site is zoned General Commercial Exception (C1-39), which permits the full range of commercial uses found in the General Commercial zone within mixed use or single use buildings, subject to various specific regulations. The Zoning By-law amendment application proposes to rezone the property to permit the proposed uses. 7. Summary of Background Studies Planning and Urban Design Rationale, SvN Architects + Planners 7.1 This report provided the planning context of the subject lands and surrounding neighbourhood along Regional Highway 2. The report identifies that the land is within a Regional Corridor in the Regional and Clarington Official Plans and is designated Commercial within the Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan. 7.2 The report summarizes all supporting material submitted with the applications and states that the proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and conforms to the Growth Plan, the Durham Regional Official Plan and the Clarington Official Plan. The proposed development supports the achievement of the objectives of the Secondary Plan, including compact, mixed uses in a transit supportive environment. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 9 Report PDS -001-21 The proposal aims to contribute to meeting density and streetscaping objectives of the Secondary Plan. 7.3 The report concludes that in this location, the proposed scale and intensity of the development considers its context and responds to urban design objectives of the Clarington Official Plan, Secondary Plan and the Courtice Main Street Urban Design Guidelines (Figure 3). Figure 3: View of proposed nine storey building from Regional Highway 2 3 [[E❑❑ Municipality of Clarington Page 10 Report PDS -001-21 Transportation Impact Study, Nextrans Consulting Engineers 7.4 The development is proposed to include 299 vehicle parking spaces and 66 bicycle parking spaces. Site entrances from Regional Highway 2 include a right in/right out access at the west side of the site and a full movement signalized intersection at the east edge of the site, shared with The Uplands development. The analysis completed for this study indicates that the internal private street network and the surrounding public streets can accommodate traffic generated by the proposed development with minimal impact on traffic volumes and travel time. The report states that the proposed supply of onsite parking will be sufficient in the context of available options for public and active transportation at the site. Environmental Impact Study Addendum, GHD 7.5 This addendum was completed in light of the Environmental Impact Study completed for the adjacent Uplands site. The original study included fieldwork on this site. Additional fieldwork needed to produce the addendum was completed in June 2020. The study recommends that work to clear the site for grading should occur outside of the April 15 to August 15 breeding bird window but recognizes that the site has already been disturbed. Environmental Noise Feasibility Study, Valcoustics Canada Limited 7.6 This study examines noise generated by traffic on Regional Highway 2, by operations at the Esso gas bar and by operations the adjacent Oshawa Monument Company. Mitigation measures are outlined in the study report and will need to be addressed by the future Site Plan approval application. Functional Servicing Report, Siteplantech Inc. 7.7 This report investigated water supply, sanitary sewer and storm drainage for the site and concludes that the existing water supply and sanitary sewer services on Regional Highway 2 have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development. Stormwater collected on this site is proposed to be stored on site, with a portion of the water to be reused as greywater and irrigation for landscaping. Stage 1-2 Archaeological Property Assessment, Amick Consultants Limited 7.8 Field investigations were completed in May 2020 and no archaeological resources were encountered. The report concludes that no further archaeological assessment is warranted and that Provincial interest in archaeological resources have been addressed. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 11 Report PDS -001-21 Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, G2S Consulting Inc. 7.9 The Phase One report identifies two areas of potential environmental concern within the site. First, there was a small welding shop on the site historically and second, the current and historic uses on the adjacent properties including the monuments manufacturer and the gas bar. The report recommends that a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment be undertaken to investigate potential contaminants in the soil and groundwater. Hydrogeological Study, G2S Consulting Inc. 7.10 The findings of the Hydrogeological Study were not available at the time of the writing of this staff report. Any future staff report will include the findings. 8. Public Notice and Submissions 8.1 Notice for this Public Meeting was mailed to each landowner within 120 metres of the site on December 16, 2020. A Public Notice sign was posted on the site at Regional Highway 2. 8.2 At the time of writing this report, no comments have been received from the public. It should be noted that this report was written in advance of the Public Meeting due to the Municipal Administrative Centre closure for the Holiday Season. Comments received at the Public Meeting and during the continued review of the applications will be considered and included in a future recommendation report. 8.3 The applicant has advised staff they will host a virtual Open House at a future date. The Open House will provide more details of the proposed development, the applicant and their consultants will be available to answer questions at the virtual open house. 9. Agency and Departmental Comments 9.1 The applications were circulated to internal departments and external agencies for review and comment. At the time of writing this report, comments had not yet been received from the Region of Durham or Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority. Clarington Public Works []Infrastructure Division 9.2 Clarington Public Works ❑ Infrastructure Division has no objection to the proposal, however there is some concern about traffic circulation internal to the site. The applicant needs to confirm the total traffic generated from the adjacent The Uplands site has been included in the intersection capacity analysis and further analysis could be required. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 12 Report PDS -001-21 9.3 This development will require access through adjacent lands for sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and watermain connections for which the applicant will require an agreement with the owner of the adjacent lands. Additional detail is required on the Site Grading Plan in between the condominium buildings and near the property lines to help depict how on-site drainage is to be conveyed and captured and how the proposed grading will tie into existing and proposed adjacent conditions. Further discussion is also required to ensure complete coordination of efforts regarding storm drainage between this site and the adjacent development. 10. Discussion 10.1 This development is intended to be complementary to The Uplands development, completing the west side of the private street between the two sites and completing the street frontage along this section of Highway 2. A cost sharing agreement between the two sites is necessary for the construction and maintenance of the private lanes and any shared services. Cross access easements will also be necessary. The site will add some small commercial space in a place easily accessible by residents of these developments and others nearby. This site is designated Commercial whereas The Uplands site is designated Mid -rise High Density Residential, both sites are within the Regional Corridor and are viewed through the same policy lens beyond the differences of the Secondary Plan designations. 10.2 Transportation objectives of the Secondary Plan are to transform Highway 2 from a �4JIQDF TH❑YLL9�CP H-DI]EAED❑Crnultimodal transportation corridor with greater HP SKD\AVR❑APg-I❑SHG+AkID❑IHEMBREP HEW Additional objectives are to support sustainable transportation choices including active transportation modes and future higher order transit and to improve the public realm and make the Corridor more transit supportive through high quality streetscaping. This proposal is part of bringing the vision for Regional Highway 2 to life by enhancing mobility options and the public realm, building transit -supportive land uses and creating an inspiring urban built form. 10.3 Traffic counts were conducted consistently with the approach taken for The Uplands site. The counts were completed on Wednesday March 4, 2020, which was before the pandemic lockdown began. Conditions observed indicate that the intersections in the study area are operating at acceptable levels of service, which is expected to continue under anticipated future conditions. The same is true of the proposed new entrances from Regional Highway 2 to serve the subject and adjacent Uplands developments. The proposed development is expected to generate 65 two-way automobile trips during the peak morning hours and 90 two-way automobile trips during the peak afternoon hours. Some common Transportation Demand Management recommendations are offered and will be considered in the preparation of the Secondary Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law amendment and through the Site Plan approval process. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -001-21 Page 13 10.4 Staff will continue to review the applications including the recommendations of technical report. Agency comments along with any public comments will be addressed in a subsequent recommendation report. Detailed site design refinement will occur through the Site Plan approval process. The applicants Open House will provide another opportunity for the public to engage in the planning process for this development. 11. Concurrence Not Applicable. 12. Conclusion 12.1 The purpose of this report is to provide background information on the proposal to amend the Clarington Official Plan, specifically the Courtice Main Street Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law for the Public Meeting under the Planning Act. It is recommended that staff continue to review and process the application and prepare a subsequent L FRP P H❑C3ht01UHSRWWRU111 R❑❑ FFM RP P HdV41HFI-LYHGD/V0V1SEE4.F11 meeting will be considered and included in the recommendation report. Staff Contact: Mitch Morawetz, Planner, 905-623-3379 ext. 2411 or mmorawetz(aD_clarington.net. Attachments: Not Applicable. Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: January 11, 2021 Report Number: PDS -002-21 Submitted By: Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning and Development Services Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: File Number: ZBA2018-0029 By-law Number: Report Subject: An application by 2411 Baseline Limited to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the development of a commercial property for a variety of uses at 2411 and 2415 Baseline Road, Bowmanville Recommendations: 1. That Report PDS -002-21 be received; 2. That the application to amend the Zoning By-law submitted by 2411 Baseline Limited be approved and that the Zoning By-law contained in Attachment 1 to Report PDS -002-21 be passed; 3. That a By-law lifting the Holding (H) Symbol be forwarded to Council once Site Plan approval has been granted and including the following items are satisfied: a) Submission and acceptance of the intersection detail design and site entrance design; b) Construction of the access and any associated costs for the construction of the access have been paid; and c) Submission of a Stage One and Two Archaeological Assessment Clearance Letter by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sports, submission of a Phase Two ESA Report and a Reliance Letter and Certificate of Insurance to the Region's satisfaction. 4. That the Durham Regional Planning and Economic Development Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PDS -002-21. 5. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS -002-21 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision by the Department. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -002-21 Report Overview Page 2 This report recommends the approval of a zoning change to allow a commercial development located at 2411 and 2415 Baseline Road. The proposed zoning change would facilitate a proposal that includes 26 commercial units. Staff will continue to work with the applicant through the site plan approval process to ensure that the comments from agencies and departments and conditions imposed for removing the Holding (H) symbol are addressed. 1. Application Details Owner/Applicant Agent: Proposal: Area: Location: Roll Numbers: Within Built Boundary 2. Background 2411 Baseline Limited D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited To permit a two-storey commercial development comprising: 3 restaurants, 13 retail units, 10 office units 133 parking spaces 1.43 ha 2411 and 2415 Baseline Road, Bowmanville 181701002007220 and 181701002007100 Yes 2.1 On November 19, 2018, the Municipality received a Zoning By-law amendment application from 2411 Baseline Limited. The application was deemed complete on November 21, 2018. 2.2 The applicant hosted a Public Information Centre on February 11, 2019 at the Comfort Inn & Suites Hotel in Bowmanville to answer questions and to collect input from the residents. Staff from D.G Biddle & Associates Limited were available to answer questions regarding the application. Municipal staff and a Councillor were in attendance. No members of the public attended the meeting. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -002-21 Page 3 2.3 The Public Meeting under the Planning Act was held on February 19, 2019. The site plan concept originally submitted with the zoning change application was for 23 commercial units and a day care. 2.4 The applicant revised the site plan concept to address comments from agencies and departments. The revised site plan concept consists of 3 buildings (Figure 1) including: Li A one storey restaurant building; ❑ A one storey building for 7 retail units and a restaurant; ❑ A two-storey building for 6 retail units and a take-out restaurant on the first floor and 10 office units on the second floor. 2.5 The following studies were circulated for comments once the applicant provided the outstanding Environmental Impact Study on September 2020: • Planning Justification Report • Update of Traffic Generation for the Proposed Commercial Development Report ❑ Functional Servicing and Storm Water Management Report ❑ Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ❑ Environmental Impact Study 3. Land Characteristics and Surrounding Uses 3.1 The subject site is generally flat, with a gentle slope from Baseline Road south and east. 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North - Baseline Park across Baseline Road and single detached homes. South - Stormwater management pond East - Residential property and Westside Creek. West - Stormwater management pond and the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre 3 C❑ Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PDS -002-21 ® Subject Property Figure 1: The subject site, revised concept site plan and surrounding area 4. Provincial Policy Provincial Policy Statement (2020) 4.1 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) identifies settlement areas such as Bowmanville to be the focus of growth. Within settlement areas, the PPS states that planning authorities 3 Fill Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -002-21 Page 5 shall promote the development of vacant or underutilized sites where feasible, considering the availability of existing infrastructure. The PPS encourages municipalities to promote long-term economic prosperity and support opportunities for economic development. 4.2 The proposed commercial development minimizes land consumption and servicing costs by promoting efficient, compact development and land use patterns. 4.3 The proposed commercial development is transit supportive as the development will be located along Baseline Road which is served by Durham Regional Transit providing regular public transit options to downtown Bowmanville as well as transit connections to areas beyond via GO Transit. 4.4 The proposed commercial development will promote energy efficient measures to tackle climate change including solar panels, electric charging stations and permeable parking areas. 4.5 Based on the criteria described above, this development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. Provincial Growth Plan (2019) 4.6 The Provincial Growth Plan directs development to settlement areas and promotes development within the Built Boundary, which the subject site is. 4.7 The Growth Plan encourages the development of underutilized land and efficient use of existing services and infrastructure in built-up areas. The proposed commercial development promotes efficient land use by developing a vacant and underutilized lands where services and infrastructure are available. 4.8 The Growth Plan directs commercial uses to locations that support active transportation and have existing or planned transit. The proposed commercial development provides pedestrian connections within the site and to the existing pedestrian network and transit to facilitate active transportation. 4.9 This proposal conforms to the Provincial Growth Plan. 5. Official Plans Durham Regional Official Plan 5.1 7 d-IMFFWWl]WITIfflFD\hIG_Z U LOM -1 CYL.❑J old )EXNF J d7Bt❑[R MW AJ:DP [Regional Official Plan. Limited office development and limited retailing of goods and services are permitted in this designation. Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -002-21 Page 6 5.2 The proposed zoning -by law amendment will facilitate the development of various retail D GFRP P HL FUOfl11 UDGWH D 1-U F-DW.37 SHS MJNLECUUGILINe Durham Regional Official Plan, increasing employment opportunities in the Municipality of Clarington, consistent with the policies of the Durham Regional Official Plan. Clarington Official Plan 5.3 The Clarington Official Plan (COP) designates the subject lands as Gateway Commercial Centres and Environmental Protection Area. Gateway Commercial areas are intended to serve the specialized needs of residents and attract visitors to the Municipality. 5.4 The proposed commercial development will be located adjacent to a Community Park (South Bowmanville Recreation Centre) which attracts tourists and visitors to the Municipality. The proposed development will benefit from the direct exposure and adjacency to the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre. The proposed uses would also be appropriate in the context of the surrounding residential neighbourhood and commercial uses located further to the east by bringing employment opportunities that can serve the community locally and beyond. The proposal will merge two properties that will allow for a larger parcel of land. The proposed design proposes commercial units that would provide flexibility to integrate units. 5.5 The Westside Creek, its floodplain and associated natural heritage system are located immediately east of this property. No development is proposed on any of the features. 5.6 The application conforms to the Clarington Official Plan. 6. Zoning By-law 6.1 The subject lands are currently zoned as follows: ■■■■111 ID i 'D'(1;L-■ 1 ►-.X1111111e 1111111'1i1111■!1111 EMJREP HA&Q 1" 11 3 11111' ■ ■ ■■■■111■ ID N. '�l11111 ■ �'■' ■ 11Q;; I' '1"■1111 11111'■ ■ 6.2 The proposed commercial development is located in an area with Gateway Commercial Centre and Environmental Protection Area Designations in the Official Plan. The zoning change will allow staff to bring the zoning by-law into conformity with the Official Plan. By changing the existing zoning Molding - / W CVV_1GEaAIDOm:1 10 11LL0RCH_;HLFHS\R__t0 a Special Purpose Commercial (C5) Zone the commercial development would provide a variety of uses consistent with the policies of the Official Plan. The existing 4 EW RSP HFM LRAF IRZ 3 -FR HF -limit would also be refined as per recommendations of the Environmental Impact Study submitted with the application. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report PDS -002-21 7. Summary of Background Studies The following are studies submitted in support of the application: Planning Justification Report 7.1 The Planning Justification report reviewed the land uses proposed against Provincial, Regional and Municipal planning policy and concluded that the proposed commercial development is appropriate for the site and neighbourhood from a planning perspective. The report stated that the proposed commercial development will provide a mix of uses to serve the current needs of the community. The report indicated that the proposed commercial development is located within the existing built-up area and promotes efficient development and land use patterns by minimizing land consumption and servicing costs. 7.2 This proposal will result in an appropriate form of development that will be compatible and complementary to nearby recreational and residential uses and supports both active and public transportation with a bus stop and bike lanes located on Baseline Road. 7.3 The report requests that the zoning by-law amendment allow for the proposed office use, as well as a full spectrum of commercial retail uses and to update the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone limits. Traffic Report -]Update 7.4 An update to the Traffic Report was required as the concept was revised, and more recent traffic counts were provided by the Municipality. The traffic signal analysis states that traffic signals are not warranted at Baseline Road/West Side Drive at this time. However, eventual signalization of the intersection maybe warranted when the entrance driveway is constructed at the Baseline RoadMest Side Drive intersection in concert with the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre expansion. Functional Servicing Report 7.5 The Functional Servicing Report identifies that the site can be serviced from the sanitary sewer and watermain on Baseline Road. It also included the following recommendations: C On-site storm sewers to be sized as per Clarington standards. The proposed stormwater quantity control requires that post -development peak flow does not exceed pre -development peak flows and that stormwater quality controls are to be provided. . Temporary sediment controls during construction will be managed with good engineering practices. 3 CF] Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -002-21 Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report Page 8 7.6 The Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (� 6 ❑❑Z D=EG4ZM[1assess the likelihood of environmental contamination originating from the site and neighbouring properties. The site is made up of two properties. 2411 Baseline Road West which is vacant and formerly used for agricultural purposes. 2415 Baseline Road West is a residential property. 7.7 In a previous ESA document, a potential contaminating activity was identified within the study area that may contribute to an area of potential concern on the site. The historic report investigated the area of potential concern, impacts were not identified, and the completion of a Phase Two ESA was not recommended. However, the Region of Durham is requesting a Phase Two. 7.8 The current Phase One ESA report advised that based on the age of the building (circa1970) a building materials survey is required prior to demolition. Environmental Impact Study 7.9 7 EIHJ ❑YIIR❑P H❑ MQP SDF\M ,6 Fstates that there will be no net loss of provincially significant natural heritage features (e.g., wetlands or fish habitat) or net negative impacts on the functions of identified natural heritage features (e.g., water quality) as a result of construction. This outcome of the study requires that the recommendations outlined in the study to address potential impacts to natural heritage features and/or their functions during the site preparation, construction and post -construction period are followed. Additional dialogue with the Municipality of Clarington and CLOCA will need to occur so that appropriate permitting processes are followed. 8. Public Submissions 8.1 Two residents contacted staff regarding this application requesting information: Before the public meeting one resident inquired about the possibility of traffic lights at the Baseline Road and West Side Drive intersection if this project is built. The Traffic Report Update states that based on the analysis, the traffic signals are not warranted at Baseline Road/West Side Drive Intersection under 2019 existing, 2025 background and 2025 total conditions. This will be further reviewed with the entrance design submission through the site plan review process. 8.2 After the public meeting one resident was looking for information on the proposed uses and availability of commercial space. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -002-21 9. Agency Comments Regional Municipality of Durham Page 9 9.1 The Durham Planning Department is satisfied that the proposed use is consistent with Provincial planning policies and conforms to the Durham Regional Official Plan. 9.2 The Durham Planning Department has reviewed the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report however disagrees with the recommendation that a Phase Two ESA is not required. The Region requires that the Phase Two ESA be undertaken and that the report be provided to the Region. Once the Region is satisfied with its contents, a Reliance Letter and CHMFDHiR [l ❑IIID-IFHI DU4FLHTI L HQVRIEHISLFISDUi -I[5 HJ IR❑FT satisfaction. 9.3 The Durham Planning Department reviewed the Stage One and Two Archaeological Report, which states that no further site assessment is required. 9.4 The Region generally has no concerns with the proposed rezoning of the subject site. They have requested that a copy of the Stage One and Two Archaeological Assessment, Clearance Letter by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sports, a Phase Two ESA report and a Reliance Letter and Certificate of Insurance be provided to the Region's satisfaction and this occur prior to the FF -MFZM U provision being lifted. 9.5 The Regional Works Department supports the zoning change however has servicing and transportation comments that will need to be addressed as part of the subsequent site plan submission. The Regional Works Department staff found the traffic report update to be acceptable. Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) 9.6 CLOCA staff does not object to the proposed zoning change. CLOCA staff are satisfied that all lands affected by natural hazards and natural heritage features have been included in the proposed EP zone. CLOCA requested that the lands zoned EP be dedicated to the Municipality of Clarington. Comments regarding planting requirements will be required through the site plan process. 10. Departmental Comments Public Works Department 10.1 The Public Works Infrastructure Division and Operations Division have no objection to the proposed zoning change subject to the following comments - 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 10 Report PDS -002-21 10.2 The applicant provided a site plan concept with an access entrance to the site that aligns with West Side Drive to mitigate vehicle conflicts from multiple accesses. Coordinating with the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre expansion, a design for a combined entrance would facilitate the commercial development and allow cost sharing. The Municipality will create a municipal Right of Way (ROW) as an extension of West Side Drive south of Baseline Road. This will provide access for the applicant and will not require access easements. 10.3 If the applicant wants to move forward with the site plan ahead of the facility expansion, the applicant will be responsible for the construction of the above noted access and any associated costs. An example of associated costs would be legal costs, and the construction cost to relocate the Ontario Power Generation (OPG) emergency siren. If the applicant decides to wait for the facility expansion, the applicant will be responsible for only a portion of the cost of the entrance with the value to be determined at that time. 10.4 Other additional comments will be required to be addressed through the site plan process including the need for a traffic management plan, a detailed entrance design, and revisions to servicing, grading, and sidewalk plans and reports. Clarington Emergency and Fire Services Department 10.5 The Emergency and Fire Services Department has no objection to the proposed zoning change to allow a commercial development and have provided comments that can be implemented at the site plan approval stage. Planning and Development Services ❑ Building Division 10.6 The Planning and Development Services ❑ Building Division has no objection to the proposed zoning change. 11. Discussion Proposed Commercial Development 11.1 The proposal represents a form of development encouraged by Provincial, Regional and Municipal policies. It will add 4,147 square metres of commercial floor space in Bowmanville, increasing job opportunities for the community and spurring additional economic development. 11.2 Figure 2 illustrates the site plan concept for the commercial development. Buildings A and B are located near Baseline Road while building C is located on the southeast part of the site. The buildings partially screen the parking areas. The proposed development will be connected to the sidewalk of Baseline Road. The supporting documents provided with the 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -002-21 Page 11 application suggest that the proposed development will also include solar panels to reduce electricity demand from outside sources to serve this site. Building C Figure 2: Proposed development looking southeast from Baseline Road Access to the Site 11.3 The subject site is located just east of the West Side Drive and Baseline Road intersection, and as such access to the site would be restricted. Staff recommend the entrance to the site be aligned with the intersection to provide full access. 11.4 To provide full access to the site, the Municipality has worked with the applicant to combine the site entrance with a future expansion of the existing South Bowmanville Recreation Centre. (Figure 3). The design of the entrance may have an impact on the overall site design as the detailed drawing will be provided through the site plan process. For this reason, the Public Works Infrastructure Division is recommending that the submission (and acceptance) of the intersection detail design and site entrance design drawing be addressed through the holding symbol (H).condition 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -002-21 Page 12 Figure 3: Proposed joint access to the subject site and the future entrance to the South Bowmanville Recreation Centre Environmental Protection 11.5 Environmental Protection Areas are recognized as the most significant components of the 0 ❑LLRSDQVII -I �dJVIDI❑YL1R❑P H-WThe eastern part of the property is designated EP. The West Side Creek, its valleyland and flood plain, and a wetland have been identified on the east part of the site. 11.6 The Environmental Impact Study determined the limit of the land to be zoned EP, which will include the above noted features as well as appropriate setbacks. The recommended EP zone limit is consistent with policies of the Official Plan and CLOCA requirements. The proposed development is consistent with the Report recommendations as all development has been proposed outside the proposed EP zone area. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -002-21 Zoning Change Page 13 11.7 The proposed zoning by-law would place the subject lands in a site-specific Special Purpose Commercial (C5) Zone and I EMUREP HEM9M LRAF1MTIE( 3 FFMRTHD The zoning change to a Special Purpose Commercial (C5) Zone exception will allow for a mix of retail, restaurant and office uses, and a range of commercial uses consistent with the policies of the Official Plan. The proposed zone will require both minimum and/or maximum yard setbacks for the buildings to maintain an appropriate distance between the buildings, the roads and adjacent properties. The proposed zoning change will also allow for the refinement of the HAL\UJ L� LMJL _P HIMM LRhF\&Udi 3 CTTREHEEDMDFTP HLW_L Concerns regarding the sensitive use (daycare) proposed originally 11.8 T h H DSSQFDI WT RlW L-DCBl9�SRm@Lf:CYCHG-��DIIHP 13DEIDUHILICo n s i d e red to be a sensitive land use and new sensitive uses are not permitted within a three kilometre radius of a nuclear facility. Ontario Power Generation (OPG) and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) provided comments regarding the proposed development stating that they have no specific concerns with permitting commercial uses on the subject property, with the exception of the proposed day care use. Since then the applicant has revised the proposal and removed the day care use from the proposal. Urban Design and Sustainability 11.9 The applicant has made several changes to the concept plan since the original submission based on the comments from Staff that will need further refinement through the site plan process. • Proposed Buildings A and B are located near Baseline Road which is consistent with the urban design policies of the Official Plan. The location of Building A at the intersection of Baseline Road and future expansion of West Side Drive would add interest to the intersection while screening the parking area. Both Building A and Building B provide patios that would contribute to animating the street. • The proposed building elevations provide canopies that emphasize the windows and doors and enhance the pedestrian environment. • The site plan concept and rendering suggest that the development will provide green building design and green infrastructure features including solar panels to minimize the consumption of energy from the grid, electric charging stations, permeable parking areas that contribute to mitigate the heat island effect of development. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 14 Report PDS -002-21 11.10 The proposed development has been designed to provided safe, well-defined pedestrian walkways that connect to Baseline Road. The site design will make it easy for pedestrians and cyclists to access the sidewalk, road and transit network available near the site. Consideration and need for a marked crosswalk connecting the development to the sidewalk, trail network and bus stop design will be required with the detailed design of the intersection of West Side Drive and Baseline Road through the site plan process. Conditions to be Satisfied Prior to Removing (H) Holding Symbol 11.11 Staff recommend that the zoning by-law amendment be approved with conditions. Staff is satisfied with adding site specific conditions to be satisfied prior to removing the (H) Holding symbol. This is an appropriate planning tool for the development of the lands that will allow the principle of development to be approved. The Official Plan has provisions for applying and removing the Holding Symbol pursuant to the Planning Act. 11.12 The recommended conditions would be in addition to the standard conditions for removing the (H) Holding symbol such as entering into a site plan agreement and satisfying all financial obligations, the follow conditions must be also satisfied, through site plan agreement, prior to the lifting of the holding provision: a) Submission and acceptance of the intersection detail design and site entrance design; b) Construction of the access and any associated costs for the construction of the access have been paid; and c) Submission of a Stage One and Two Archaeological Assessment Clearance Letter by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sports, submission of a Phase Two ESA report and a Reliance Letter and Certificate of Insurance to the Region's satisfaction. 11.13 The applicant is agreeable that the Zoning By-law Amendment include a (H) Holding symbol pending the future approval of a site plan application. Site Plan Process 11.14 The applicant has been notified of comments from agencies and departments that will need be addressed as part of the site plan process. Staff will work with the applicant through the site plan review process to address detailed urban design and sustainable design, final site and building design, landscaping, green infrastructure features and signage. 12. Concurrence Not Applicable. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -002-21 13. Conclusion Page 15 In consideration of all agency, staff and public comments, it is respectfully recommended that the zoning change to allow the commercial development be approved. Staff Contact: Ruth Porras, Senior Planner / Urban Designer, 905-623-3379 ext. 2412 or RPorras(a)_clarington.net; Carlos Salazar, Manager of Community Planning and Design, 2409 or csalazar a( clarington.net. Attachment: Attachment 1 - Draft Zoning By -Law List of interested parties to be notified of Council's decision is on file in the Planning and Development Services Department. 3 rn Attachment 1 to Report PDS -002-21 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. ■ 111' ',' Il 1"■1�� \�1�1 [II SIC, ll�� 111 II) ■ "■ 701001 1� 111■■■fi Being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA 2018-0029 to permit the development of a commercial property for a variety of uses; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: Section 20.4. [ESI-FLDq EFHS\&RVT Special Purposed Commercial (C5FFMR11HEAV hereby amended by introducing a new Sub -section 20.4.17 as follows: =11117. Special Purpose Commercial Exception ((H)C5-171�RFIH Notwithstanding Sections 19.1 b, 19.3.d., e. and f. and 3.12 those lands zoned C5-17 on the Schedules to this By-law shall be used subject to the following zone regulations: a. Definitions i) Department Store: Shall mean a retail/commercial establishment organized into a number of individual departments and primarily engaged in the sale to the public a wide variety of commodities, including clothing, hardware, home furnishings and household appliances. b. Non -Residential Uses i) Business, Professional or Administrative Offices; ii) Building supply outlet; iii) Beer, liquor or wine outlet; iv) Eating establishment; v) Eating establishment, take-out; vi) Garden or nursery sales and supply establishment; vii) Laundry; viii) Retail/Commercial Establishment, excluding department stores, supermarkets, and sales of furniture, major appliances and office furniture; 3 rn 2 91 CI ix) Service shop, personal; x) Service shop, light; xi) Veterinarian clinic; xii) No drive-through facility is permitted for an eating establishment; and xiii) No outdoor storage and display are permitted; C. Loading Spaces i) A permitted use with up to 411 square metres gross commercial floor area requires a loading space of 7.5 metres x 3.0 metres. ii) Two loading spaces of 11 metres x 4.0 metres d. Regulations for Non -Residential Uses i) Front Yard and Exterior Yard (minimum) 3 metres (maximum) 6 metres ii) Interior Side Yard (minimum east side) 10 metres iii) Interior Side Yard (minimum west side) 5 metres Schedule E -W -L daw 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: Holding - / U❑WILGCA DCG111710 ❑T_TTR❑H_Y9_L6SHFLDC8XLSRVH_LRP P HI.FLDO Exception ((H)C5-❑❑®Rd-I1111 I _ML9Z❑P HAMM LIRPoFWEIE( 3 FUREH SFFLDCBX U:ZVM ommercial Exception ((H )C5- ❑❑MMRLHO TD❑G iiii FMA -/ U EWEG A DCm CO ❑mmRd-I ❑MLPcID H_NEU LRAF1W❑ru( 3 mFHREHii I[ WEFG[6 FEFK K(HFM LLI • ■. C r � Il�h��,',�s ■. rJu...�,� wt� (�)1i1 �� � _,► � 1�i1b 1111 This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act. By -Law passed in open session this day of 3 rn .2021 Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2021- , passed this day of , 2021 A.D. 0 0 N 7011N N Q Zoning Change From "(H)M1" To "(H)C5-17" w N Zoning Change From "EP" To "(H)C5-17" s Zoning Change From "(H)M1" To "EP" Q Zoning To Remain "EP" Bowmanville • ZBA 2018-0029 • Schedule 3 Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk [[E❑❑ Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: January 11, 2021 Report Number: PDS -003-21 Submitted By: Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning and Development Services Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: File Number: ZBA2019-0015 By-law Number: Report Subject: Rezoning to facilitate 3 severances at 1535 Ovens Road in Newtonville Recommendations: 1. That Report PDS -003-21 be received; 2. That the application to amend Zoning By-law 84-63 be approved and the By-law contained in Attachment 1 of Report PDS -003-21 be passed; 3. That once all conditions contained in Report PDS -003-21 with respect to Removal of the (H) Holding Symbol are satisfied, the By-law authorizing the Removal of the (H) Holding Symbol be approved; 4. That the Region of Durham Planning and Economic Development Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PDS -003-21 DQOEI] 5. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS -003-21 and any delegations be 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -003-21 Report Overview Page 2 Will and Nancy Vanniejenhuis submitted an application to amend Zoning By-law 84-63 to facilitate the creation of 3 new lots within the Hamlet of Newtonville. This report recommends Council approval of the application for a Zoning By-law Amendment as contained in Attachment 1. The result will be rezoning of the property from [Agricultural (A)❑to [Holding - Residential Hamlet ((H)RH)❑and IEnvironmental Protection (EP) 1. Application Details 1.1 Owner: 1.2 Agent: Will and Nancy Vanniejenhuis Rich Bouma 1.3 Proposal: To amend Zoning By-law 84-63 to rezone the property from L$JtiF❑W=TARTRCQJ - Residential Hamlet ((H)[5 ❑Cly DQGIE( QAJRCP HCWM LRMURQi.( 3 Tto facilitate the creation of 3 new lots. 1.4 Area: The total area is 8.6 ha (21.2 acres): each proposed lot is slightly greater than 4,000 sq. m. (1 acre), leaving a retained lot of approximately 7.4 ha (18 acres) 1.5 Location: 1.6 Roll Number: 1.7 Within Built Boundary 2. Background 1535 Ovens Road, Newtonville (see Figure 1) 1817-030-010-13450 No 2.1 On September 6, 2019 the Municipality received an application to amend Zoning By-law 84-63 to facilitate the severance of three new lots within the hamlet of Newtonville. The S-RSHAIV1L/-F-IQMRCCIGFI$JJF❑W ELH[ZKLFKrequires a minimum lot area of 40 hectares (100 acres). The proposed lots would be approximately 4000 sq. m. (each about 1 acre). The retained lot would be 7.4 hectares (21.2 acres). The applicants are requesting a portion of the lands be rezoned to permit the three 1 -acre lots (see Figure 1). 3 T Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report PDS -003-21 Figure 1: Location of property and proposed severances rn Municipality of Clarington Page 4 Report PDS -003-21 2.2 The existing lot contains a single -detached dwelling, at least one accessory building, and environmental features. The applicant submitted an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) and a Hydrogeological Study to determine the development limits and if there will be any impacts on the natural heritage features. The Municipality and agencies have worked with the applicants to determine the development limits based on the findings of the studies and Municipal policies and regulations. To protect the natural features, the lands with environmental features and the buffer are proposed to be zoned Environmental Protection (EP). 2.3 Should this rezoning application be approved, applications to the Durham Region Land Division Committee would be required to permit the creation of the lots. 2.4 The applicant submitted the following studies and reports in support of the development. These studies and reports have been reviewed by Staff and agencies and are summarized in Section 7 of this report. Environmental Impact Study, prepared by Niblett Environmental Associates Inc. Hydrogeological Assessment, prepared by GHD Site Screening Questionnaire, prepared by GHD 3. Land Use Characteristics 3.1 The lands are located within the hamlet of Newtonville on the east side of Ovens Road, south of Regional Highway 2 and north of Highway 401 (see Figure 1). 3.2 The existing land uses include a single family dwelling, at least one accessory building, a pond, and other environmental features. The property is serviced by municipal water and privately serviced for sewage. The lands gradually slope towards Highway 401. 3.3 The surrounding land uses are as follows: North — Single detached dwellings on large lots and Regional Highway 2 South — One residential lot and Highway 401 East — Predominantly agricultural fields and wooded areas West — Predominantly wooded areas and Bouchette Point Creek Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -003-21 4. Provincial Policy Provincial Policy Statement Page 5 4.1 In rural areas, rural settlements shall be the focus of growth and development, and their vitality and regeneration should be promoted. Development should avoid risks to public health and safety and seek to minimize any impacts on the natural environment. The proposal to create three lots contributes to an appropriate range and mix of housing, conserves biodiversity, and supports the ecological benefits on the site. The proposal represents an opportunity for infill development within a hamlet utilizing existing municipal water services and road infrastructure. 4.2 The proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. Greenbelt Plan 4.3 Newtonville is a hamlet within the Protected Countryside of the Provincial Greenbelt Plan. Hamlets are subject to the policies of the Growth Plan and the local Official Plans. Limited growth is permitted through infill and intensification, subject to appropriate water and sewage services and having regard for the greater connectivity of the natural heritage system and its functions. 4.4 The proposal is consistent with the Greenbelt Plan. Growth Plan 4.5 Municipalities are encouraged to plan for a variety of cultural and economic opportunities within rural settlement areas to serve the needs of rural residents and area businesses. New multiple lots or units for residential development will be directed to settlement areas, such as the hamlet of Newtonville. 4.6 The proposal conforms to the Growth Plan. 5. Official Plans Durham Regional Official Plan 5.1 7 KHAVEP IIIFV 1 JVS� C DWIM DP 1NH-LL LI_LDP L5 W LRQ2 I I LFLDCB CCU] DP BA L consist of predominately single detached dwelling units. New developments within hamlets are required to complement existing building types. Hamlets may accommodate limited growth if they are considered suitable for further development. 5.2 The Hamlet of Newtonville is serviced by municipal water and private sewage disposal. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -003-21 Page 6 5.3 The Official Plan identifies Key Natural Heritage and Hydrological Features in the southern and eastern portion of the site. The creation of new lots for development is not permitted in these features or the associated buffer. The location and extent of the features and the associated buffer were refined, identified, and mapped in the detailed site-specific studies. 5.4 The proposal conforms to the Durham Regional Official Plan. Clarington Official Plan 5.5 7 KH -L (ED -0 URQ2 I I FM 00 -0 -MJ CDhUV9HS _RSH DP 0104A Q_L RCP HOM 3 -Rv FgRQMDQG IT] +FQ)SDFH-7 KHS LCDQu( \4+41 ZQGv/ Z 000WHIE11 DP M designation shall be residential uses in the form of single detached dwellings. Individual land severances may be considered provided they do not jeopardize the future development of the hamlet. Any new residential lot shall: ❑ Have a minimum lot size of approximately 4000 sq. m. (1 acre); ❑ Meet the requirements of the Durham Region Health Department; ❑ Provide a primary and reserve area for a conventional septic tile field area; if development is serviced by approved alternatives, the size of the residential lot may be reduced subject to appropriate studies; and Provide a technical report that demonstrates that there is no adverse impact on adjacent wells and septic systems and meets provincial guidelines for assessing water supply and risk of water quality impact. 5.6 Policies allow minimum lot sizes in Newtonville be reduced below 4000 sq. m. provided an engineering study is submitted and meets the requirements of all approval agencies. However, in this proposal all lots, severed and retained are greater than the minimum 4000 sq. m. 5.7 The creation of new lots for development is not permitted in natural heritage or hydrologically sensitive features or the associated buffer. The EIS identifies environmental features on a portion of the lands. The Official Plan policies allow refinements to the natural heritage feature boundaries through a site-specific study without the need for an amendment to the Official Plan. The proposed lots and all new development are proposed to be located outside of the features and the required 15 metre buffer. 5.8 The proposal conforms to the Clarington Official Plan. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -003-21 6. Zoning By-law Page 7 6.1 Though within a hDP i[SJSH��RC J JF❑ = ❑I17KH[$J IIF❑MIDC)TIRCHEI was used in many rural settlement areas to recognize historical land uses and remains in place until the property is further evaluated and zoned appropriately. 6.2 Lands outside the areas with natural features and the required 15 metre buffer are S-F�SRflGAR-KDJHAMIDJ�M FKDQJ HG1_RP ❑$ J ILF❑MI_DQ $ AR_I_5 ML�DP ®MSI (RH) to facilitate the creation of three (3) residential lots. The RH Zone requires a minimum lot area of 4000 sq. m. and a frontage of 30 metres. The proposed lots conform to the RH Zone regulations. 6.3 Lands within the areas with natural features and the buffer are proposed to have their —QJ FFKDQJ FG1-W -$J JF❑WCDCQ$ MVRA Q1LFZCP HOM Q -I 3 J,Po VM natural features. 7. Summary of Background Studies Environmental Impact Study, Niblett Environmental Studies 7.1 The EIS concludes the proposed severances would not result in negative impacts on the natural heritage features or their functions, provided that the proponent follows the measures recommended in the report, including the requirements to consult with the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) regarding the presence of the threatened species habitat and appropriate mitigation measures. 7.2 Staff and commenting agencies had several comments which were addressed by the DSSQFDC VVI-FRGA/❑ OGQJ SPA iTROZ LQJ ❑ Defining the potential building envelope for a new single detached dwelling and the septic bed area on the retained lands. The proposed location for a dwelling on the retained lot is now in the back field, behind the proposed severed lots. F Clarifying the exact location of the fish habitat and the significant woodlands, as well as their associated buffer on the property. Providing an illustration which clearly indicates the natural features, the proposed lot lines will be outside the EP Zone (the lands with natural heritage features and the required buffer). The southern lot has been adjusted to be outside the EP zone. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -003-21 Hydrogeological Assessment, GHD Page 8 7.3 Staff reviewed the Assessment and provided comments to the applicant. Further revisions were required to ensure consistency between the EIS and the Hydrogeological Assessment. 7.4 The Region of Durham Health Department required the Assessment be peer reviewed. All potential concerns are resolved, and Durham Health has no objection to the proposed lots. The peer-reviewed document concludes that the installation of the proposed sewage disposal systems will not result in unacceptable degradation of the shallow groundwater. 7.5 Durham Health has indicated that municipal water service is available to the subject site from Ovens Road, however the watermain ends at the existing residential dwelling. 7.6 Conditions of the Land Division application will include the proponent be responsible for the design and construction of the watermain extension and a fire hydrant. The cost of this will be the responsibility of the proponent, including the $6,000/lot buy -in rights payment for the watermain extension. Site Screening Questionnaire 7.7 The questionnaire concludes that the subject lands do not contain any indicators of potential site contamination and the site is thus suitable for the proposed severances. The Region of Durham concur with these findings. 8. Public Submissions 8.1 A Public Meeting was held on December 2, 2019. No public concerns were presented at the Public Meeting and Staff have not received any enquires regarding this application. 9. Agency Comments Ministry of Transportation 9.1 The Ministry of Transportation (MTO) has no objection to the rezoning. Any future development on the retained lands must maintain a minimum 14 metres setback from the MTO Highway 401 right-of-way. The closest development will be more than 300 meters from MTO property. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -003-21 Regional Municipality of Durham Page 9 9.2 Regional Planning provided comments advising that they have no objection to the rezoning provided that the proponent receive documentation from the MECP demonstrating that the proposed development will have no negative effects on the identified threatened species prior to passing the Zoning By-law Amendment, or DWFCD►VHD EHV-ElVlFVW]DM LXFZGU Fprovision. 9.3 One of the conditions of the subsequent Land Division application will be to meet any requirements MECP may have regarding the presence of threatened species habitat and appropriate mitigation and/or compensation measures to ensure no residual effects. Only after all conditions of the Land Division are cleared will a by-law authorizing the Removal of the (H) Holding Symbol be presented to Council. 9.4 The Region also states that the three severed lots and the retained lot must be connected to municipal water services and that the existing dug well on the property must be abandoned in accordance with Provincial regulations. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority 9.5 7 K ISI; SA O'WD-HR-\MCI iA W-IFRQM DLWRIM]l�U C +DDQG[V +HI RUHE GRCA has no objection to the rezoning of the proposed lots. The retained lands will have the potential to build a single detached dwelling, once the severances are approved. The retained lands contain environmental features. These environmental features should be identified and zoned appropriately as part of the Zoning By-law Amendment. The appropriate building envelope for the retained lot has been reviewed by GRCA staff. 9.6 GRCA requested a fence be installed along the western watercourse buffer to protect the riparian habitat from future mowing and lawn maintenance. One of the conditions of the subsequent Land Division application will be to fence off the existing field laneway (see Figure 2) on the retained lands and the lands be revegetated to enhance the protection of the fish habitat. A driveway to access the new home on the retained lands will be provided from Ovens Road by a 10 metre wide strip between two of the proposed lots. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -003-21 �r s a yysi .r Figure 2: Field laneway to be fenced off and revegetated 10. Departmental Comments Page 10 10.1 The Infrastructure Division of Public Works does not have any objections in principle to the proposed zoning change. Further comments and conditions will be provided at the Land Division application stage. 10.2 Emergency and Fire Services does not object to the rezoning. 10.3 The Building Division of Planning and Development Services has no comments or objections to the rezoning. 10.4 The Operations Division of Public Works has no objections to the rezoning. Comments related to mud tracking to and from the site during construction and vehicle load restrictions were provided. It was also noted that the construction on Ovens Road for connection to municipal water must reconstruct the road to good or better condition than it was prior to hook up. Flow drainage features, such as ditches and swales, are to be maintained at all times. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -003-21 11. Discussion Page 11 11.1 Provincial policies focus growth and development to settlement areas, including rural settlement areas such as Newtonville. Severances are permitted, provided the lots can be appropriately serviced and minimal public expenditure is associated with the development. The proposal on the subject lands will utilize existing road infrastructure and public water and have enough land area to be serviced by private sewage. 11.2 The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate the severances within the hamlet of Newtonville is generally permitted in the Clarington Official Plan. The applicant has revised the original submission for the location of a dwelling on the retained lot and the vehicle access to avoid impacts to the natural heritage features. These features are protected by establishing the limits of the features and their associated buffers and prohibiting development within these areas. This approach follows the direction of the Clarington Official Plan, which designate this portion of the land Environmental Protection Area and Green Space. 11.3 The lands that contain natural features and the required buffer will be zoned Environmental Protection (EP) rather than Agricultural (A). This is a more appropriate zone for these lands and will help to protect these natural features. 11.4 The lands outside the natural features and associated buffer are requested to be rezoned to Residential Hamlet (RH) rather than Agricultural (A). This is a more appropriate zone and would facilitate the creation of three residential lots. Each lot would be at least 4000 sq.m. (1 acre) with frontages of at least 30 metres. The retained and proposed lots conform to the requirements for the RH zone. 11.5 An accessory building is located on the proposed retained lands near Ovens Road. There appear to be other, much smaller sheds on the lands as well. The proposed severances will result in the accessory building on a different lot than the current dwelling. This means there would be an accessory building without a principle building on the same lot, which is not permitted by Zoning By-law 84-63. A minor variance will need to be approved to permit an accessory building or buildings without a principal building. Bringing any accessory buildings into conformity with Zoning By-law 84-63 will be a condition of the subsequent Land Division application. 11.6 A Holding (H) Symbol is proposed to be placed on the property until the proponent satisfies all conditions of the subsequent Land Division application. Conditions discussed in this report include: F Meet any requirements MECP may have regarding the presence of threatened species habitat and appropriate mitigation and/or compensation measures to ensure no residual effects; and 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -003-21 Page 12 ❑ 0 HHN15 ❑$ VMHTELFP HCVVMnce off the existing field laneway on the retained lands and the lands be revegetated to enhance the protection of the fish habitat. 12. Concurrence Not Applicable. 13. Conclusion 13.1 It is respectfully recommended that the application to rezone the subject property to protect the natural heritage features and facilitate the creation of three new lots at 1535 Ovens Road in Newtonville be approved. The proposed infill development will utilize partial municipal services and is generally consistent with Provincial, Durham Regional, and Clarington land use policies. Staff Contact: Mark Jull, Planner II, 905-623-3379 or mjul�clarington.net Attachments: Attachment 1 -]Zoning By-law Amendment Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. 3 rn Attachment 1 to Report PDS -003-21 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington ■ 1 .'lll ►"■1�� \�1�i [II ■ �I� 1�11�� 11111111■ "■ ■ ■1111 111■■■f1 being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA2019-0015; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That, the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. Schedule 146Eto By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone from "Agricultural (A) Zone" to "Holding - Residential Hamlet ((H)RH) Zone" D❑GIE( ❑d.REP Hd1gQ3 EIRIFWLA 3 MMRd-lE[as illustrated on the attached Schedule AEhereto. 2. 6 F HC3 "—attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 3. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act. By -Law passed in open session this day of 12021 Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk 3 rn Attachment 1 to Report PDS -003-21 This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2021- , passed this day of , 2021 A.D. saw 1639 - 00 CO 1617 1587 A 1535 0 1530 O 1400 II 1385 ~ ' 0 Zoning Change From "A" To " (H)RH" u 0'. Zoning Change From "A" To "EP" Clarke • ZBA2019-0015 • Schedule2 Adrian Foster, Mayos June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: January 11, 2021 Report Number: PDS -004-21 Submitted By: Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning and Development Services Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: File Number: ZBA2020-0013 By-law Number: Report Subject: Lindvest Properties (Clarington) Limited proposed Red Line Revisions to a Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning North-east corner of Grady Drive and Rudell Road, Newcastle Recommendations: 1. That Report PDS -004-21 be received; 2. That the red -lined revision to a Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision submitted by Lindvest Properties (Clarington) Limited to alter the lot frontages and road layout, be supported subject to the conditions contained in Attachment 1 to Report PDS -004-21; 3. That the application to amend Zoning By-law 84-63 be approved and that the Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 2 to Report PDS -004-21 be passed; 4. That once all conditions contained in the Official Plan with respect to the removal of the (H) Holding Symbol are satisfied, the By-law authorizing the removal of the (H) Holding Symbol be approved; 5. That the Durham Regional Planning and Economic Development Department and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PDS -004-u DLG_&R- 1D G 6. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS -004-21 and any delegations be DGAM-GR IL& R-IJU -G Fi s i o n. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -004-21 Report Overview Page 2 This report recommends approval of red -lined revisions to a Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment submitted by Lindvest Properties (Clarington) Limited. The red -lined revisions include increasing the lot frontage of several lots north and south of Whitehand Drive, and changes to the road pattern. The Zoning By-law Amendment would implement the changes to the lot frontages and increase the lot coverage for several lots. 1. Application Details 1.1 Owner/Applicant: Lindvest Properties (Clarington) Limited 1.2 Agent: Michael Fry, D.G. Biddle & Associates 1.3 Proposal: Red -Line Revision to Draft Approved Subdivision The red -lined revisions include increasing the lot frontage of several lots north and south of Whitehand Drive. All lots will have a minimum of 11.3 metres of frontage. The road network north of Whitehand Drive will be altered. The proposal will result in 6 additional lots, in this final phase of development. Zoning By-law Amendment The Zoning By-law Amendment is to permit the proposed changes to the lot frontages and increase lot coverage from 40% to 45% for 2 storey dwellings and from 45% to 50% for one storey and bungaloft dwellings. 1.4 Area: 8.1 Ha. (20 acres) 1.5 Location: North-east corner of Grady Drive and Rudell Road, Newcastle 1.6 Roll Number: 18-17-030-130-15331 1.7 Within Built Boundary: No 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -004-21 Page 3 Subject Property IZBA 2020-0013 C�nadiahfpdC �i \\S 79 982 c 0 115 114 n M r0 m 10fi 105 11 • .� 102 1101 98 97 15 94 93 19 96 89 23 86 f,_ 1 82 r m Lo n 8 v cn o) v r �O <pN N O cn N N '.6 CO -3 � 'Ill Illi �Lr�rt1L"J ll L"JLf�Y.l V l i 98 99 164 'Ati m �: 2235 r1 r� r� iv _ _ - o �, _� m ' 1 94 95 '.160 �- 2215 90 91 156 22t5 86 87 162- 22 Ni` -219 . N 7.9 144 Figure 1: Subject Property 2. Background 2.1 In March 2004, approval was granted for the Foster Creek North Neighbourhood Design Plan and two draft plans of subdivision for a total of 540 residential units (18T-89059 and S -C-2000-001). An amendment was approved in October 2006 to increase the number of units to 665. 2.2 Three phases of the subdivisions have been registered and are fully occupied. The former school block, Draft Approved in 2018, and the subject lands are the remaining lands to be developed. 2.3 In March 2019, the applicant was granted an extension to Draft Approval to 2025. The extension was required to suit tFIW5 H1LR:IHLE(DWI /V I34 J 3 ®❑❑ Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -004-21 Page 4 the necessary infrastructure to service the remaining units. The earliest opportunity to commence house construction is 2023. 2.4 In June 2020, the applicant submitted applications for Red -Line revision to the Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision and a Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate an alternate road pattern, lot frontage and sizes and to increase lot coverage from 40% to 45% for 2 storey dwellings and from 45% to 50% for one storey and bungaloft dwellings. 3. Land Characteristics and Surrounding Uses 3.1 The subject lands are currently vacant and have been used as a construction marshalling area (i.e. trailers and parking) for the previous phases of the subdivision and to stockpile excess soils on a temporary basis. The lands were previously used for agriculture. Figure 2: Subject lands looking north from the end of Rudell Road. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -004-21 3.2 The surrounding uses are as follows: North - Canadian Pacific Rail Corridor and Agricultural lands South - Single detached dwellings East - Rickard Neighbourhood Park and single detached dwellings West - Vacant lands, Foster Northwest Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision 4. Provincial Policy Provincial Policy Statement Page 5 4.1 The Provincial Policy Statement encourages planning authorities to create healthy, livable and safe communities by accommodating an appropriate range and mix of housing types and development patterns, while making efficient use of land and infrastructure. 4.2 Healthy and active communities should be promoted by planning public streets to be safe, meet the needs of pedestrians, foster social interaction and facilitate active transportation and community connectivity. Compact and diverse developments promote active modes of transportation such as walking and cycling. 4.3 The subject applications are consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. Provincial Growth Plan 4.4 The Provincial Growth Plan encourages municipalities to manage growth by directing population growth to settlement areas, such as the Newcastle Urban Area. Municipalities are encouraged to create complete communities by promoting a diverse mix of land uses, a mix of employment and housing types, high quality public open space and easy access to local stores and services. 4.5 The subject applications conform to the Growth Plan. 5. Official Plans Durham Regional Official Plan 5.1 The Durham Region Official Plan designates the lands as Living Areas. Lands designated Living Area permit the development of communities incorporating the widest possible variety of housing types, sizes and tenure to provide living accommodations that address various socio-economic factors. 5.2 The proposed development conforms with the Durham Region Official Plan. Clarington Official Plan 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report PDS -004-21 5.3 The Clarington Official Plan designates the lands as Urban Residential. The subject lands are within the Foster Neighbourhood. The Urban Residential designation shall predominantly be used for housing purposes, providing for a variety of densities, tenure and types. Neighbourhoods are to be walkable, compact, connected and create a high- quality public realm. The proposed development will integrate into the surrounding community and be consistent with the neighbourhood identity that surrounds it. 5.4 The proposal conforms to the Clarington Official Plan. 6. Zoning By-law 6.1 Zoning By-law 84-63 zones the subject lands -Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-44 ,1 -Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-45)4 and -Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R1-67)F.] The current zoning was approved when the subdivision was approved in 2004. 6.2 A zoning by-law amendment is required to allow for the altered lot frontages and the increased lot coverage on the specific lots as contained in Attachment 2 of this report. 7. Public Notice and Submissions 7.1 A statutory Public Meeting was held on October 5, 2020. Staff received two inquiries for additional information but no additional comments regarding the application were received. 8. Agency Comments Regional Municipality of Durham 8.1 Comments from Durham Region Planning, Works and Transit Departments have no objections with the proposed alteration to the road pattern, the lot pattern and changes to the lot frontages or with the proposed increase in lot coverage. The Region has indicated they will require an updated noise report as part of the amended Conditions of the Draft Approval, which has been included as a condition. Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority 8.2 The Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority has no objections with changes to the road pattern, the lot pattern and frontages or with the proposed increase in lot coverage. Canadian Pacific Rail 8.3 Canadian Pacific Rail had no comments or concerns with the proposed changes to the road pattern or the lot pattern and frontages or with the proposed increase in lot coverage. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -004-21 Ministry of Transportation Page 7 8.4 The Ministry of Transportation had no concerns with the proposal. Nothing other than soft landscaping can EHLZ W)[L -ANH-0 L V -L] P MAIHI_AFNff)FN1U;P 11TIW EZ D=❑171❑❑® 8.5 The required acoustical noise fencing will be outside of the 14 metre setback. 9. Departmental Comments Public Works ❑ Infrastructure Division 9.1 The Infrastructure Division of the Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed revisions to the increase in the number of lots and the increased lot coverage requested and have no objections. The applicant was required to provide updated stormwater data to justify the increased lot coverage and the additional 6 lots. The additional information is satisfactory. Emergency and Fire Services 9.2 The Emergency and Fire Services Department have no objections to the proposed application. Building Division 9.3 The Building Division has no objections to the proposed application. 10. Discussion 10.1 The proposed redline revisions to the final phase of a Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision of 2004 will alter the road network by extending a road across the north part of the entire phase, increasing circulation and connectivity through the subdivision. The red line revisions will eliminate the 15 -metre single detached dwelling lots south of Whitehand Drive, replacing them with 11.3 metre frontage single detached dwelling lots. The elimination of the 15 metre lots reduces the lot frontage variation within this phase of the subdivision as the majority of the lots will have a 11.3 metre frontage. The 11.3 metre frontage allows for a two car garage and double wide driveway. The applicant has proposed the changes in response to current market conditions. 10.2 The unopened portion of the right-of-way for Rudell Road currently extends to the south limits of Highway 35/115. The applicant has shown proposed lots but they are not part of these applications. This will require an application for the closure and conveyance of the Rudell Road right-of-way sometime in the future. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report PDS -004-21 10.3 The Conditions of Draft Approval require the dwellings to be situated outside of the Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) corridor and Ministry of Transportation (MTO) corridor shown in blue and yellow on Figure 3, respectfully. CP requires noise attention fencing adjacent to the CP right of way. The noise fencing will connect to existing noise fencing located in the previous phase to the east, on Noden Crescent. 10.4 There is a significant grade difference between the MTO and CP overpass and proposed Lots 55 to 63. The overpass is higher than the proposed lots. To avoid a high noise fence along Lots 55 to 63, approximately 4 metres, a noise barrier is proposed connected to the dwelling into the rear yard, as shown on Figure 4. The height of this fence ranges between 2 and 3 metres. This provides an amenity area directly adjacent to the dwelling and still provides full access to the rear yard. This option meets the Ministry of Environment, Parks and Conservation criteria for noise attenuation for residential uses adjacent to railway and highway corridors. The design of these fences will be included in the detailed engineering submission and the appropriate warning clauses will be added into the subdivision agreement. 10.5 There are no objections to the proposed red line revisions to the draft approved plan of subdivision or rezoning. The proposed changes provide for better connection throughout the neighbourhood and are in keeping the character of the previously developed phases of the subdivision. 3 TFIFI Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -004-21 Page 9 papa a _- I IIIIIIII,l 11 n pacific Rai S ��. 1 doil o 40 1 I 1 1 !r 4 -i -1- 115d_ way ♦ I r r rr r I I I r r r r 1 I J 1f`{_ ` r r 96 1 4 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 a I 1 k I I � Q I I I ---------- ---------- ----------- I ____F____iI I I -- — — + — — ——- F ---- I I I I I I O I I I ---- � ----� i ---- Lots Requesting p -- - - + - - - -i F---- Inceased Lot 1 , I Coverage 1 �© 14m MTO Setback PC 111 1 1 � o I'M 91,13 D -.4 LTJ 30m Rail Setback Future Roads Figure 3: Lots with increased lot coverage and MTO & CP Rail setbacks Figure 4: Acoustical barrier fencing for Lots 55 to 63, shown in blue. 3 [[E❑❑ Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -004-21 27 jq61'V y Page 10 ii Figure 4: Acoustical barrier fencing for Lots 55 to 63, shown in blue. 11. Conclusion 11.1 It is respectfully recommended that in consideration of all agency and staff comments that the applications for Red Line revisions to a Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision to alter the road pattern and lotting frontages be supported and that the Zoning By-law Amendment to change lot sizes and to increase lot coverage for several lots within the draft approved plan be passed as contained in Attachment 1 and 2 of this report be supported. Staff Contact: Brandon Weiler, Planner, (905) 623-3379 ext. 2424 or bweiler@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 [1 Amended Conditions to Draft Approval Attachment 2 ❑ Draft Zoning By-law Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. 3 rn Clarington Attachment 1 to Report PDS -004-20 Amendment to The Conditions of Draft Approval File Number 18T-89059 Lindvest Properties (Clarington) Limited Issued for Concurrence: December 17, 2020 Notice of Decision: Amendment Approved: Faye Langmaid, RPP, FCSLA Acting Director of Planning and Development Services Municipality of Clarington The Conditions of Draft Approval for 18T- 89059 as issued on October 16, 2006, and amended on September 16, 2014, October 16, 2006 and February 26, 2019 are further amended as follows: Condition 1 is deleted and replaced with the following: Ln The Owner shall have the final plan prepared on the basis of the approved draft plan of subdivision 18T-89059, prepared by Tunney Planning Inc. identified as project number Tun 562-1, and drawing number DP -4, dated September 2006, redlined revised, dated March 2014, and further redlined amended and prepared by D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited identified as project number 119091, revised September 2020, which illustrates 146 lots for single detached dwelling and new public roads and related services in Phases 5 and 6.L1 2. Condition 76 is amended as follows - 111111L Prior to final approval, the Owner is required to submit a signed Record of Site Condition (RSC) to the Regional Municipality of Durham, the Municipality of Clarington and the Ministry of the Environment (MOE). This RSC must be to the satisfaction of the Region, including an Acknowledgement of Receipt of the RSC by the MOE. An updated letter from a Qualified Person (QP), which outlines the status of the current soil and groundwater conditions affecting the subject lands. The most recent environmental work the Region has on file is dated July 7, 2016, which exceeds the 18 months and is not considered current in accordance with the Provincial Brownfields Regulation (Ontario Regulation 153/04). 3. Condition 83 is deleted and replaced with the following: ain The Owner shall agree to provide the Municipality of Clarington and the Region of Durham a revised Noise and Rail Vibration Report and implement the recommendations of the report. The report entitleGlTraffic Noise and Rail Vibration Impact Study Draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-89059, Part Lots 29 and 20, Concession 2, Newcastle, OntarioL, prepared by HGC Engineering, dated. 3 rn Page 2 October 11, 2002, D ❑=-H-TSC EF" Fly/H-' P SDFT6'lIGn) IRVIiEE1 RFE® by HGC Engineering dated April 29, 2008, which specifies noise attenuation measures for the development shall be updated to reflect the new lot configuration and include the required noise attenuation fencing for Lots 55 to 63. The measures shall be included in the subdivision agreement and must also contain a full and complete reference to the noise report (i.e. author, title, date and any revisions/addenda) and shall include any required warning clauses identified in the study. 4. Condition 88 is amended as follows: ■II■� �, II- l�c�' IlclT�7 11111'lll -T� [0 *T.DII of the sentence 1s, ■1. ■� n■� • ���►� u11� n�-u rni■inn ■e�■ t111 0 ul■111 IR0 a W ■-�-ol, �A � -[c■� ■ � -�u■.a etc ■ i...- ■ ■■ n -r --e■1i-�.h.1� ■1. n1 vi) [Purchasers and tenants are notified that in accordance with Board Transportation policies school bus pick up points will generally be located on a through street at a location convenient to the Student Transportation 6 HFF1FWRI II& HCFM QFD4R7 iii) h) Owner agrees to implement those noise control measures recommended in the revised Noise Report required in Condition 79. iv) 1) The Owner agrees to install a noise attenuation barrier from the amenity space at the rear of the dwelling in accordance with the revised Traffic Noise and Rail Vibration Impact Study for lots 55 to 63. 4. Condition 89 is replaced with a new Condition 89 as follows: 89. (1) The Owner covenants and agrees to provide the Municipality of Clarington with evidence that satisfactory arrangements, financial and otherwise, have been made with Canada Post Corporation for the installation of Lockbox Assemblies as required by Canada Post Corporation and as shown on the approved engineering design drawings/Draft Plan, at the time of sidewalk and/or curb installation. The Owner further covenants and agrees to provide notice to prospective purchasers of the locations of Lockbox Assemblies and that home/business mail delivery will be provided via Lockbox Assemblies or Mailroom. 3 rn Page 3 (2) The Owner shall satisfy the following requirements of Canada Post Corporation and the Municipality with respect to the provision of mail delivery to the Subdivision Lands and the provision of community mailbox locations, as follows: (a) The developer will consult with Canada Post to determine suitable permanent locations for the Community Mail Boxes or Lock box Assemblies (Mail Room). The developer will then indicate these locations on the appropriate servicing plans (b) The developer agrees, prior to offering any units for sale, to display a map on the wall of the sales office in a place readily accessible to potential homeowners that indicates the location of all Community Mail Boxes or Lock Box Assemblies (Mail Room)., within the development, as approved by Canada Post. (c) The owner/developer will be responsible for officially notifying the purchasers of the exact Community Mailbox locations prior to the closing of any home sales with specific clauses in the Purchase offer, on which the homeowners do a sign off (d) The Builder/Owner/Developer will confirm to Canada Post that the final secured permanent locations for the Community Mailboxes will not be in conflict with any other utility; including hydro transformers, bell pedestals, cable pedestals, flush to grade communication vaults, landscaping enhancements (tree planting) and bus pads. (e) The developer agrees to include in all offers of purchase and sale a statement which advises the purchaser that mail will be delivered via Community Mail Boxes or Lock Box Assemblies (Mail Room). The developer also agrees to note the locations of all Community Mail Boxes or Lock Box Assemblies (Mail Room)., within the development, and to notify affected homeowners of any established easements granted to Canada Post to permit access to the Community Mail Boxes or Lock Box Assemblies (Mail Room). (f) The owner/developer will agree to prepare and maintain an area of FRP SDF+-GJ rDl DR-& DCDM[3 RV❑ IN)S FLLLFDI; Q/ EIEHDV[ID❑ temporary Community Mailbox location. This location will be in a safe area away from construction activity in order that Community Mailboxes may be installed to service addresses that have occupied prior to the pouring of the permanent mailbox pads. This area will be required to be prepared a minimum of 30 days prior to the date of first occupancy. (g) The owner/developer will install concrete pads at each of the Community Mailbox locations as well as any required walkways across the boulevard and any required curb depressions for wheelchair access as per Canada 3 RV❑ UTF T[NILiLSDGAVSHFULFDIIRQQID❑LOJV. 3 T❑❑ Page 4 (h) The developer agrees to provide the following for each Community Mail Boxes or Lock Box Assemblies, and to include these requirements on the appropriate servicing plans: (if applicable) - Any required walkway across the boulevard, per municipal standards. - If applicable, any required curb depression for wheelchair access, with an opening of at least two meters (consult Canada Post for detailed specifications). 5. A new Condition 90 is added as follows: The Owner shall agree to provide engineering plans to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Durham which shows the location of all transit -related infrastructure/facilities (including how it coordinates with proposed landscaping, driveway entrances and other facilities) within the subdivision. 6. Condition 89 is renumbered and replaced with a new Condition 91 and h) is added as follows: h) Canada Post, Metro Toronto Region, 1860 Midland Ave. 2nd Floor Scarborough ON, M1 P 5A1 I:\^DepartmE.. _abdivision\18Ts\18T-89059 - Lindvest\Amendment red line to D.A.- July 2020\Amendment to Draft Approval\Amendment to The Conditions of Draft Approval_17'Dec'2020.docx Attachment 2 to PSD -004-21 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. ■ 111 �l ►"■1�� \�1�1 [II ■■ SIC, 1�� 11111) ' [II) I111■■ ::: being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington for ZBA2020-0013; Now Therefore the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. 6 F-FMT-E❑1111E16 SFFIDQ] LFHS1RT7T 8 LED[15 HAG --1A09\ SH7Z R-5 TTTRTH-L T amended by adding Special Exception Zone 13.4.89 as follows: 13.4.89 Urban Residential Exception (R2-89[URTHT Notwithstanding Sections 13.2 a., b., c. ii. iii, e., and h. those lands zoned R2-89 on the Schedules to this By-law shall be subject to the following regulations: a. Lot Area (minimum) 350 square metres b. Lot Frontage (minimum) i) Interior Lot ii) Exterior Lot C. Yard Requirements (minimum) Exterior Side Yard Interior Side Yard 11.3 metres 14.4 metres 6.0 metres to private garage or carport and 4.3 metres to dwelling With attached private garage of carport 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the other side; without an attached private garage or carport 3.0 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the other side Setback from railway property line 30 metres �ment 2 to Report PDS-004-21.do- 3 ®❑❑ Attachment 2 to PSD -004-21 d. Lot Coverage One and a Half -Storey and Two Storey Dwelling (maximum) i) Dwelling 40 percent ii) Total 45 percent e. Lot Coverage Single -Storey Dwelling (maximum) i) Dwelling 45 percent ii) Total 50 percent f. Garage Requirements i) All garage doors shall be located no closer to the street line than WHA HM1 TALR-VE DMJHF\MJRJAC3-I[Z RlF❑❑ projection; ii) In no case shall the garage door be closer than 6.0 metres from the front lot line or exterior side lot line; and iii) The outside width of the garage shall be a maximum of 55% of the width of the lot frontage. 2. 6 FFM- 1❑1111E16 ShFM ❑ FHSM❑FM 8 LED❑ 5 HAG i❑ 9 \ SH7 Z R❑5 ❑FtMR❑HMIM amended by adding Special Exception Zone 13.4.90 as follows: d 3.4.90 Urban Residential Exception (R2-90) ZR❑H❑ Notwithstanding Sections 13.2 a., b., c. ii. iii, e., and h those lands zoned R2-90 on the Schedules to this By-law shall be subject to the following regulations: a. Lot Area (minimum) 350 square metres b. Lot Frontage (minimum) i) Interior Lot 11.3 metres ii) Exterior Lot 14.4 metres C. Yard Requirements (minimum) i) Exterior Side Yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport and 4.3 metres to dwelling ii) Interior Side Yard With attached private garage of carport 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the other side; without an attached private garage or carport 3.0 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the other side 3 11E❑❑ 91 0 5 d. Lot Coverage (maximum) i) Dwelling ii) Total e. Garage Requirements Attachment 2 to PSD -004-21 45 percent 50 percent i) All garage doors shall be located no closer to the street line than WH -CE HUrJ LJURi� D(RUHEV4JlRULLC3-iLZ D0 UFR SRIF L projection; ii) In no case shall the garage door be closer than 6.0 metres from the front lot line or exterior side lot line; and iii) The outside width of the garage shall be a maximum of 55% of the width of the lot frontage. Schedule L5Lto By-law 84-63, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone designation from: "Holding Urban Residential Exception ((H)R1-67)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-89) Zone" "Holding Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-44)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-89) Zone" "Holding ❑ Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-45)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-89) Zone" "Holding Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-44)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-90) Zone" "Holding ❑ Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-45)" to "Holding - Urban Residential Exception ((H)R2-90) Zone" as illustUMVIGJR r H-DAWEHG[6 FLHK[0-A-hereto. 6 FE GEO-A attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act. Passed in Open Council this day of 3 rn , 2021 Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2021- , passed this day of 2021 A.D. O s �2T79599103109111115 r D PIN 17 109 7 r o m v rn rn 10 Q5 11 10 101 1 9 97 9 93 19 89 23 $� fh rn 4] I� M 78 �O cD �'✓Sa N m a I � o - rn • M M m N r' `n o o rn 98 I 99 164 2235 ��� msa� r��� �r 94 I I95 166 2225 90 I 191 156 2215 86 I I87 152 tp O R CQ N (➢ O V W p N P _ Zoning Change From "(H)R1-67" To "(H)R2-89" 0 Zoning Change From "(H)R2-44" To "(H)R2-89" 0 Zoning Change From "(H)R2-44" To "(H)R2-90" s Zoning Change From "(H)R2-45" To "(H)R2-89" - Zoning Change From "(H)R2-45" To "(H)R2-90" Newcastle • ZBA 2020-0013 • Schedule 5 Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: January 11, 2021 Report Number: PDS -005-21 Submitted By: Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning Services Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO By-law Number: File Number: PLN 37.0.1 Resolution#: Report Subject: Seasonal Sidewalk Patio Program 2020 Results, Guidelines, and Procedures Recommendations: 1. That Report PDS -005-21 be received for information; 2. That Council approve the allocation of $5,000.00 from each of the Bowmanville, Newcastle, and Orono Community Improvement Programs ($15,000 total) to be used to support any additional restaurants that may apply to participate in the Seasonal Sidewalk Patio Program; and 3. That all interested parties and any delegations be advised of CO_CFLCVC&Fl14R0_1 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -005-21 Report Overview Page 2 In 2017, Council approved a pilot project to permit restaurants in downtown Bowmanville and Newcastle to establish sidewalk patios within Municipal rights-of-way. In 2018, staff developed guidelines and approval procedures in support of the Sidewalk Patio Program and coordinated the design and construction of patio and sidewalk extension infrastructure at one restaurant location in each of the two downtowns. Interest in the Program has grown over the last few years and was particularly active during the 2020 season as it provided restauranteurs an opportunity to offer sit-down dining during the COVID-19 pandemic. This report provides an overview of the 2020 Sidewalk Patio season the COVID-19 factor, and proposed updates to the Program in light of the experience implementing the program to date. 1. Background 1.1. Seasonal sidewalk patios were identified by Council as an initiative that would help to HQD+Q Q CQJ URV pmt [FIS❑ OR:] Qk 16 0-i- D5 SDAWD+-IIXFD HG7 L1,PQLQI NH❑ municipal right-of-way for pedestrian -oriented amenities that improve liveability, enhance pedestrian experience, and support local businesses. 1.2. In 2017 Council adopted the recommendations of Report PSD -033-2017 to: (i) Approve a pilot project to permit restaurants in downtown Bowmanville and Newcastle to use on -street parking to establish seasonal sidewalk patios; (ii) Direct staff to develop guidelines and approval procedures for privately initiated seasonal sidewalk patios on municipal rights-of-way for the 2018 summer season -land (iii) $0FDALU111❑1111❑❑TIRP AWMI❑❑❑1DOGISEEMEF-DYLIERmmunity Improvement Plan (CIP) grant funds for Bowmanville and Newcastle to provide an incentive to assist an eligible restaurant with the implementation of a patio. 1.3. In 2018, Report PSD -006-18 presented guidelines and approval procedures for sidewalk patios, and Council approved the Application process for Seasonal Sidewalk Patios on Municipal Property. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 3 Report PDS -005-21 1.4. The Seasonal Sidewalk Patio Program was developed in consultation with restaurant owners in the Bowmanville and Newcastle downtowns and the applicable Business Improvement Associations (BIA). Input considered in the development of the Program included (i) assurance the patios would be available for more than a single season to the restauranteurs in order to justify their investment in the patio infrastructure (outdoor furniture, lighting, heaters etc.), and (ii) the ability to serve alcohol within the patio areas. 1.5. Three -Six Kitchen in Bowmanville and : D@KVLSnug in Newcastle participated in the pilot Program and operated patios during the inaugural 2018 season. Staff worked with the restaurants to ensure the patio infrastructure met applicable accessibility requirements and was sized in accordance with liquor license requirements. 1.6. Feedback collected from participating restaurants and patrons after the first sidewalk patio season in 2018 was generally positive. Restaurant owners advised the patios were a success that translated into new customers, and additional staff. Planning Services staff conducted a survey of patio patrons that indicated the sidewalk patios were a welcome addition, and a number of visitors had stopped in the downtown areas because of the patios. Often these patrons went on to visit other local shops. Both Three -Six Kitchen and : D@KVLSnug operated their patios again throughout the 2019 season and had indicated their intent to re -apply in 2020. 1.7. In 2019, Council adopted the recommendation in Report PSD -002-19 which expanded the Seasonal Sidewalk Patio Program to Orono, and included the allocation of funds I _RP -2 I_ QRVLEI,3 IASRAG IDA P L® HWR_IM_SQtform construction. 1.8. In preparation for the 2020 season the Program Guidelines, Application Form, and Sidewalk Patio License Fee were updated to reflect feedback received and experience gained through the implementation of the Program. Such changes were outlined in detail in Resort PSD -053-19. 2. The 2020 Sidewalk Patio Season 2.1. The 2020 Sidewalk Patio season presented unique challenges and opportunities and was a particularly active one in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. During this time when restaurants have been subject to indoor dining restrictions and closures, patios have been an opportunity for businesses to offer patrons a sit-down dining option. 2.2. WD0KV_6ClFJ [participated in the Program for the third consecutive year. While Three - Six Kitchen had initially applied to re-establish its patio, the restaurant opted not to proceed with the patio this season in favour of concentrating on growing a curbside pick-up component of the business. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -005-21 Page 4 2.3. Star Apples restaurant in Bowmanville also re-established its sidewalk patio this season, using a similar configuration to the patio in 2019. The patio is entirely contained on private property and therefore no application was required. 2.4. Three new seasonal sidewalk patios were installed throughout the 2020 season at the Endivine Bar and Grill in Bowmanville, the Massey House in Newcastle, and the Fire Hall Bistro in Orono. The cost of the construction of the patio infrastructure at each of these locations was supported by the $7,500 of funding allocated from the downtown Community Improvement Plan grant funds in each community. 2.5. Restaurants have provided feedback indicating the importance of the sidewalk patio to the business during a year when conventional operations have not been possible. Other feedback has related to the size of the patio area in relation to the physical distancing measures in effect, which has resulted in the seating capacity being significantly reduced. 2.6. Staff also received feedback from a member of the Orono community indicating concerns that the patio at the Fire Hall Bistro created a sight line issue for those using the adjacent laneway. 0 DLQ-6 Vf++A i2 ERQRM/ D—RDG Q3HEV& 5 HJ IRQ- RI I[[] ❑EKDP V❑ jurisdiction. Staff worked closely with Regional staff this year to design and obtain the necessary approvals for the patio. Staff will consult with Regional staff to ensure this issue is addressed should the Fire Hall Bistro re -apply for the sidewalk patio in 2021. 2.7. Seasonal sidewalk patio infrastructure remained in place until the end of October this year, at which point removal was necessary in order to prepare for winter road maintenance. The COVID-19 Factor 2.9 This annual report typically deals exclusively with F-OFLQJ\RQVSeasonal Sidewalk Patio Program. However, on the subject of patios in 2020, it is important to provide a brief overview of patios in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. 2.10 In June 2020, the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (ACCO) announced that liquor sales licensees were able to temporarily extend their patios or temporarily add a new licensed patio adjacent to the premises for the duration of 2020, once they were permitted to open. Licensees were required to demonstrate the municipality did not object to the patio, and they were able to comply with applicable physical distancing requirements. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -005-21 Page 5 2.11 In response, Council directed staff to (i) adapt the existing Sidewalk Patio Program process and application form to deal with temporary COVI D-1 9 -related patios (ii) work with participating restaurants to ensure all applicable safety and accessibility requirements are met, and (iii) incorporate a grant program to support the cost of establishing outdoor seating areas into the COVID-19 CIP. 2.12 Twelve local restaurants took advantage of the opportunity to create outdoor eating areas to offset the restrictions on indoor dining. In some cases, temporary patios were located along municipal rights-of-way while other businesses created outdoor seating areas on private property. 2.13 Costs associated with the set-up and furnishing of new or expanded COVID-19-related outdoor seating areas are eligible for funding under the Adaptation to Outdoor Operation grant included in the COVID-19 CIP. Qualifying restaurants are encouraged to apply for a grant to assist with such costs. Grant applications for patio projects completed in 2020 are being accepted until February 11, 2021. 2.14 In December, the Province announced amendments to a number of regulations to support businesses as they recover. These include amendments to Ontario Regulation 719 under the Liquor License Act to enable an extension of the permission for temporary patios. The Registrar of the AGCO recently indicated support for the continuation of the current permissions until the end of 2021. 2.15 Staff will monitor new information relating to patios as it becomes available and will continue to work with participating restaurants in 2021. Adjustments to the temporary COVI D-1 9 -related patio process may be necessary as the pandemic situation evolves and new adaptation strategies emerge. 3. Guidelines and Approval Procedure for Seasonal Sidewalk Patios 3.1. In 2018, Municipal staff developed a Seasonal Sidewalk Patio approval process and an application form that outlines all the applicable requirements and guidelines (Attachment 1). The process and form are typically reviewed and updated as necessary after each patio season to reflect feedback received on the process, experience gained through the implementation of the program, and the actual operating costs. At this time, there are no changes proposed to application form, which is appended to this report as Attachment 1. 3.2. The Municipality is responsible for design and construction of the patio infrastructure in order to ensure any rerouting of the sidewalk (if necessary) is carried out in a safe and appropriate manner. The Municipality also provides off-site winter storage of the patios. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 6 Report PDS -005-21 3.3. Initially, the installation and removal of the patio was carried out by a contractor arranged by the Municipality, the cost of which was to be covered by the Sidewalk Patio License Fee. Beginning in fall 2019, Public Works staff has handled the set-up/removal of patio infrastructure. This modification to the process has helped to reduce and better anticipate costs. Restaurant owners are responsible for the patio area once installed, including planters, furniture, heaters, lighting etc., and are required to provide site plan drawings of the patio area proposed to occupy municipal property. 3.4. In preparation for the 2020 patio season, the Sidewalk Patio License Fee was increased by 15% to $1,725 to better reflect the costs associated with the set-up/removal of the patios at the beginning and end of each season. A License Fee increase is not recommended for 2021 at this time; however, the Fee will be subject to an annual increase (approximately 3%) applicable to all Planning applications. 3.5. Staff worked closely with the contractor who constructed the three new sidewalk patios for the 2020 season in an effort to increase efficiency and decrease the cost of the patio set-up/removal process and P DAP IL-HAFAH-0 CtRSD FKVIGVLC3i❑DXSCfiZ❑ infrastructure. Through this collaboration, the design of the patio infrastructure has been standardized, enabling it to be installed at and used by any qualifying restaurant. Further, the patios have been constructed to enable them to be transported in a standard pick-up truck, simplifying the process and reducing the need for and cost of specialized rental equipment. 3.6. Restaurants applying for sidewalk patios are responsible for obtaining (i) the necessary insurance to address municipal right-of-way occupancy, and (ii) a liquor licence to cover the sidewalk patio area. Council direction was to restrict applications to restaurants that have liquor licences and are open in the evening and on weekends. This requirement ❑ sJRDCR❑HO I4_HM19H- M❑CSR❑W-An 2020, Council modified the guidelines to enable restaurants in Orono without liquor licences to participate in the Program. 3.7. Coffee shops and cafes that do not have liquor licences have historically placed tables and chairs adjacent to their storefronts. This practice continued throughout the 2020 patio season as businesses adapted operations during the pandemic. Provided this street furniture is maintained by the cafe owner and does not narrow the sidewalk beyond 1.8 metres, they have been allowed. However, should the furniture impede pedestrian access, Municipal By-law Enforcement has the right to remove the impediment as outlined in the Boulevard By-law 2013-066. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 7 Report PDS -005-21 3.8. The Application Form and patio design requirements contained in the Guidelines have been reviewed with the Accessibility Coordinator and the Accessibility Advisory Committee. All patios must comply with requirements of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. Seasonal Sidewalk Patio Applications are reviewed to ensure the location, design and layout and ingress/egress meet the applicable requirements under the Act. 4. Community Support 4.1. Feedback from the community relating to the Program in 2020 has been relatively minimal. As mentioned previously, staff is aware of a concern regarding a sight line issue in Orono. As in past years, the community appears to have embraced the presence of sidewalk patios during the summer months. Patios appeared to be well - used this season and perhaps offered a welcome opportunity for a brief respite during the ongoing pandemic. 4.2. The BIAs and CIP Liaison Groups have been kept apprised of the Seasonal Sidewalk Patio Program, the adapted process to provide for temporary COVI D- 1 9 -related patios, and the development of the COVID-19 CIP grant programs to assist with the costs of outdoor seating areas. 4.3. BIAs generally agree the outdoor patios serve as a people generator and enliven the street, thereby achieving the Program objectives. CIP Liaison Group members feel the Program has been successful and support continuation and expansion of sidewalk patios. In 2019, Bowmanville members inquired as to potential of a grant to cover the fee in light of the positive contribution of sidewalk patios to the downtown. Sidewalk Patio Licence Fees paid by restaurants in 2020 are eligible for coverage under the COVID-19 CIP grant programs. 4.4. Initial concerns relating to safety and loss of parking appear to have been abated as the Program has been implemented. To date, there does not appear to have been a negative effect on the parking supply in the downtown areas, however each Seasonal Sidewalk Patio application is and will continue to be reviewed in this context. 4.5. Clarington Tourism has featured outdoor patios as part of its promotions in recent years. Tourism operators have received positive feedback from visitors indicating that sidewalk dining opportunities are appreciated. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Page 8 Report PDS -005-21 4.6. In support of the expansion and continued success of the Seasonal Sidewalk Patio Program, and the enhanced importance of patios VRV-SSR-WH\A@EFDDAt RSH / during the COVID-19 pandemic, staff recommends the allocation of funding from the Bowmanville, Newcastle, and Orono CIP funds to support new participants in the Seasonal Sidewalk Patio Program in 2021. It is noted the value of the funding through each downtown CIP is smaller than has been allocated in previous years. This has been recommended in consideration of the new funding opportunities in support of patios under the COVID-19 CIP. 5. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Director of Public Works who concurs with the recommendations. 6. Conclusion 6.1. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the 2020 sidewalk patio season and outline any proposed updates to the Program for 2021. 6.2. 2020 was a particularly active patio season, in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Three new seasonal sidewalk patios, one in each downtown, were approved and constructed. The design of the new patio infrastructure was standardized this year to maximize efficiency and decrease costs of set-up and removal. 6.3. Existing sidewalk patios have been successful in animating the street and drawing visitors to the downtown areas. To support the continued success of the Seasonal Sidewalk Patio Program, it is respectfully recommended that funds be allocated from the downtown CIP programs in 2021. Staff Contact: Sarah Allin, Planner II, 905-623-3379 extension 2419 or sallin@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 -]Seasonal Sidewalk Patio Application Form; 2021 Interested Parties: List of Interested Parties available from Department. 3 rn Attachment 1 to Report PDS -005-21 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Seasonal Sidewalk Patios on Municipal Property Application Form Municipality of Clarington Planning Services Department Please ensure all information is included in the application. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. Please return this application by 4:00 PM on or before March 1St Business Information Owner Name: Phone Number: Registered Name of Business: Operating Name of Business: Street Address of Business: Postal Code: E -Mail: After Hours Contact 1 Name: Phone number: After Hours Contact 2 Name: Phone Number: Checklist Requirement Y/N Copy of complete Seasonal Sidewalk Patio Application Form Copy of the vendor permit for the business Site Plan, including dimensions (see appendix A) Copy of current liability insurance (see appendix B) Patio Sidewalk License Fee payment Copy of AGCO liquor license for principal establishment and sidewalk patio* Municipal Information Form for the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (ACCO)* Fees Patio Sidewalk License $1725 Fire Review and Inspection As per the Fees By-law, as amended Municipal Information Form for the AGCO No charge All applicable fees, as detailed in this application and/or as cited in the Municipality of Clarington Page 1 of 7 Attachment 1 to Report PDS -005-21 I/We hereby make application to the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington EEH+W R+i and d-I+lD\ blE[E&(D-"\ R❑EHto occupy the right of way for the purpose described and agree to abide by the conditions of this permit and other applicable Municipal bylaws. I/We agree to assume all liability and/or cost as a result of road occupancy to maintain the work area and to indemnify and save harmless Clarington until final completion and approval. I understand this is a competitive process and that application for a patio does not guarantee that I will be selected. I understand that the project is not guaranteed to continue in future years. Agreement I, the undersigned have read and understood the information provided and agree to abide by all conditions and provisions listed on this permit application, and permit, if issued. Authorized Representative I0Or,mi- Signature: - Signature: 3 rn Date: Page 2 of 7 Attachment 1 to Report PDS -005-21 Appendix A Site Plan and Design Requirements Your patio design must conform to the following requirements. Site Plan Requirements: a. Location and dimensions of the patio entrances, exits, and access to washrooms, in accordance with the Integrated Accessibility Standards for the Design of Public Spaces; b. Location and use of the adjacent buildings and their entrances and exits; c. The location and dimensions of the patio and its entrances and exits; d. Area of the patio in square metres; e. Width of sidewalk occupied in metres; f. Length of sidewalk occupied in metres; g. Number of parking spaces occupied; h. Width of sidewalk that will remain unobstructed (to be at least 1.8 metres); i. The location and dimension of any enclosures, umbrellas, tents, awnings, etc.; j. The location, height, and construction material to be used for the boundary fence, gate location, and width of gate; k. Location of fire extinguishers; I. Location of tables, chairs, other furniture or installations, etc. and the distance between them to demonstrate how your patio will be accessible to patrons with limited mobility; m. Location of all municipal services and/or assets within or adjacent to the patio (e.g. location of curbs, municipal parking spaces, sidewalks, hydrants, storm sewer grates, manholes, trees, hydro poles, streetlights, benches, garbage cans, sign poles, etc.). Identify whether any of these elements would need to be removed or relocated to accommodate the design. Additional fees may apply for removal or relocation, if such modification is permitted); n. The access to municipal improvements such as trees; o. The location of Durham Region or GO Transit stops close to the patio; p. The address of your business; q. The number of seats on your patio; and r. The maximum occupant load of your business and patio according to the Ontario Building Code. Design Requirements: a. All patios must maintain the requirements of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA). These guidelines set out basic requirements of the AODA. It is the responsibility of each business to ensure their own compliance with the Act; b. A minimum passable sidewalk width of 1.8m must be maintained at all times to ensure accessibility for pedestrians; c. Patios are not permitted to reduce the width of the traffic lanes of the public street. A minimum street width of 6m must be maintained at all times to ensure adequate width for emergency vehicles; d. Patios are not permitted to occupy more than 2 parking spaces; 3 -- Page 3 of 7 Attachment 1 to Report PDS -005-21 e. Entrances to the patio, aisles within the patio, and all public areas must be maintained in a manner that ensures the accessibility of patrons of all levels of ability (preferably 860mm); f. Design materials must be in keeping with the heritage character of downtowns; Plastic and polyvinyl is not permitted. Composites are permitted provided their appearance fulfills the above noted requirement(s). For input on potential design concepts, contact the Planning Services Department; g. Awnings, umbrellas and other fixtures must be maintained in good condition and repair; h. Barriers between the sidewalk extension and the patio should feature planting boxes and are to be maintained by the restaurant; i. No objects are permitted to overhang the sidewalk; and j. The Applicant may only occupy and use the outdoor patio after any installed structures have been approved in writing by Clarington. Clarington responsibilities: k. Temporary sidewalk design, location and dimensions, grade, construction material, IDI HvVID❑GMGE DJL1 CT L(C EHA ®-L-1 WD=I I❑SR❑LA.EONID& R❑ ❑Cvvi I I be undertaken by a contractor; 1. Exterior barriers encroaching into on -street parking spaces must be affixed with high- visibility reflective markers for nighttime visibility; m. Wooden sidewalk extensions may include safety traction tape to reduce the chances of pedestrians slipping; and n. Installation, removal and winter storage of constructed temporary sidewalk or patio. Appendix B ❑ Liability Insurance Requirements Please provide proof that you are compliant with the following liability insurance requirement: You must hold and provide General Liability Insurance from an insurer licensed in the province of Ontario for $2 million per occurrence with an aggregate limit of no less than $5 million to the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington against any liability for property damage or personal injury, negligence including death which may arise from the DSSUDEK operations under this agreement. The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington must be included as an [$G31R-DCNamed ,❑m+iGMIn addition, the Commercial General Liability shall contain Cross Liability and Severability Clauses and Products & Completed Operations coverage including a standard contractual liability endorsement. 3 TT Page 4 of 7 Attachment 1 to Report PDS -005-21 Appendix C General Conditions Your operation of an outdoor patio must conform to the following requirements. General conditions: a. Any person or persons intending to occupy a portion of the municipal right of way for any purpose, including a portion of the sidewalk, boulevard, or on -street parking must first receive permission from Clarington; b. Patios will not be installed prior to April 30 and will be removed no later than October 30 of each year. For Bowmanville, installation will be after Maplefest and removal will be prior to Applefest; c. Permission to install a patio for a season does not entitle a business to any right or expectation to be able to install a patio in subsequent seasons; d. Any required sidewalk extensions must be completed before obstruction of a sidewalk for construction or operation of a patio; e. The Applicant assumes all maintenance and liability for the patio and may be required to undertake alterations or repairs as are required by Clarington to maintain safety and accessibility; f. Clarington retains the right to access the patio and/or sidewalk extension if needed for maintenance or emergency access to municipal property; g. Permission to occupy the municipal right of way becomes null and void if the applicant should fail to meet the requirements set out in this application and other applicable documents, in which case, Clarington shall be at liberty to take any action it deems necessary to repair the patio or to reinstate the site to its original condition for public protection at the expense of the Applicant. In all cases the decision of Clarington staff is final; h. The Applicant shall maintain access to all public and private properties for the duration of the work; i. All municipal property, including the sidewalk, lighting, or other features will be returned to their initial condition or repaired of any damages. Damages not repaired by the Applicant will be repaired or replaced by Clarington at the ASSUDd11Yt7cost. j. No business shall be eligible to operate an outdoor patio unless the business is in compliance with all &01f❑JVVLn1 requirements; k. The Applicant shall be deemed to be the +-R11EVtFVREDEGthe ER-d-iEII[fior all purposes under the Occupation Health and Safety Act for the railings and restaurant features on the sidewalk. The Applicant shall further be deemed to be the :RFF-SIH]]or all purposes under the Occupiers Liability Act; I. The Applicant agrees to indemnify and save Clarington harmless from and against all losses, damages, actions or causes of action, suits, claims, demands, penalties, interest and/or legal fees on a substantial indemnity basis arising in connection with any matter that may arise from the issuance of a permit hereunder or the activities that occur on a patio; m. Clarington retains the right to access any planters, baskets, light posts, or other infrastructure for watering, maintenance, or other matters. Clarington may elect not to 3 T-- Page 5 of 7 Attachment 1 to Report PDS -005-21 install planters at the location of the patios; n. Any costs, expenses or liabilities incurred by Clarington as set out above may be collected by Clarington by means of invoicing for the costs; and o. The Applicant agrees to provide Clarington with a letter from a qualified person, after patio construction/installation and before beginning operations, confirming that construction completed is in general conformance with the approved design. Operating Requirements a. At a minimum, restaurants operating an outdoor patio must be open during the following hours: Tuesday to Saturday: 11:30 AM to 9:00 PM; b. The operations of the business and patio must comply with Clarington IEI Noise By - Law (2007-071), as amended; c. The owner shall ensure that the area around the patio is kept clear of litter, waste, cigarette butts, and refuse. The restaurant will inspect on a daily basis; d. No person shall operate an outdoor patio on any municipal property other than that for which permission has been granted; e. No person shall permit the consumption of alcoholic beverages within any outdoor patio area unless such area is licensed under the provisions of the Liquor License Act to permit the consumption of alcoholic beverages and unless such outdoor patio extension is operated in conjunction with a business holding a valid Liquor License; f. Where such premise is licensed to permit the consumption of alcoholic beverages, no person shall serve or allow the consumption of alcoholic beverages contrary to any law; and g. Outdoor patio operations are permitted only during hours authorized by the Municipality of Clarington. Patio operations must cease between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM, except for Fridays and Saturdays in July and August, during which patios are permitted to remain open until 11:00 PM. Patrons are not permitted to be in, or remain in, the patio area outside of authorized hours of operation. Clarington reserves the right to change these hours. 3 TFIFI Page 6 of 7 Attachment 1 to Report PDS -005-21 Appendix D ❑ Post -submission evaluation Submission of a complete application is not a guarantee of permission being granted for an outdoor patio. Applications will be evaluated by staff to determine which will be selected. Applications will be circulated to appropriate departments and partner organizations for their comments. Criteria Criteria Explanation Location Sites that are located in ways that are complementary to the existing street design and require less extensive change to existing use and management patterns will be preferred. Design Material choice []Appropriate heritage materials and design. Streetscape ❑ Attractive design elements for both patrons and pedestrians. Safety Sites that pose fewer challenges to traffic and pedestrian movement and sightlines will be preferred. Accessibility Sites that more fully ensure the accessibility of the sidewalk and patio for all patrons, in part through greater sidewalk width, will be preferred. Sites should not reduce accessibility by proposing the displacement of parking designated for persons with disabilities. Potential Preference will be given to patios that offer greater potential to demonstrate the economic benefit of the program. 3 [[E❑❑ Page 7 of 7 Clarington Staff Report If this information is required in an alternate accessible format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Report To: Planning and Development Committee Date of Meeting: January 11, 2021 Report Number: PDS -006-21 Submitted By: Faye Langmaid, Acting Director of Planning and Development Services Reviewed By: Andrew C. Allison, CAO Resolution#: File Number: PLN 7.3 By-law Number: Report Subject: Committee of Adjustment By-law ❑ New Recommendations: 1. That Report PDS -006-21 be received; 2. That By-law 83-83, and its amendments, be repealed, and the By-law attached to Report PDS -006-21, as Attachment 2, be passed; and 3. That all interested parties listed in Report PDS -006-21 and any delegations be D❑EWHE R F R-1FLC /� 1 -FMR 1❑ 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -006-21 Report Overview Page 2 Planning and Development Services Department and the Municipal Solicitor were asked to review procedural rules from the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) and review the Committee of Adjustment By-law that dates back to 1983. This came as a result of recommendations contained in Report CLD -011-20, regarding electronic participation at meetings. The purpose of this report is to advise Council on the findings and recommendations regarding electronic participation for the Committee of Adjustment and request Council enact a new Committee of Adjustment By-law. 1. Background 1.1 Prior to the COVID19 pandemic and state of emergency, changes were evolving to allow for electronic participation by Members of Council and local boards. As a result of the COVID-10 pandemic emergency further revisions were made to the Municipal Act, 2001. 1.2 Report CLD -011-20 directed Planning and Development Services Staff and Legal Staff to undertake a review of the Committee of Adjustment By-law including provisions for the holding of electronic hearings, and report with findings and recommendations. Staff were asked to review the procedural rules of the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) to determine best practices at the Provincial level. 1.3 In April 2020, staff from the Clerks division, with the assistance of Planning and Development Services Staff, drafted an internal procedure document for electronic Committee of Adjustment meetings during the pandemic (Attachment 1). Since then a total of 10 meetings have been held and 46 minor variance applications have been considered. Members of the public are offered an opportunity to speak to applications and the process is working very well. Staff and the Committee members can be commended as they made the transition to electronic Committee of Adjustment hearings successfully and early on in the shutdown. 2. Discussion 2.1 The Rules of Practice and Procedure for the LPAT have been amended to provide for electronic hearings. However, the LPAT rules do not adapt readily for use by the Committee of Adjustments. Staff have concluded that the electronic participation provisions of the Council Procedural By-law serves as a better model for electronic Committee of Adjustment. 3 rn Municipality of Clarington Report PDS -006-21 Page 3 2.2 Staff have tailored the Committee of Adjustment procedure (Attachment 1) to fit the needs of local Committee members, participants and members of the public. It is working very well. The Committee of Adjustment meeting closely mirrors the procedures for Council meetings and is hosted via Microsoft Teams. 2.3 Staff continue to monitor the process and procedure for electronic participation and provide assistance as needed to applicants and members of the public that may not be familiar with the technology. 2.4 In performing this review of internal procedures and electronic meetings, it was noted that the Committee of Adjustment By-law 83-83 required updating. The By-law dates back to 1983 and needs to be updated to reflect the latest provisions from the Planning Act. Amendments to the by-law were passed each time new Committee members were appointed however this is not reflective of current practice. A new by-law is recommended for approval (Attachment 2), which among other things provides for electronic participation. 2.5 The new Committee of Adjustment By-law (Attachment 2) together with the internal procedural document relating to electronic meeting (Attachment 1) provides for best practices to conduct hearings via electronic participation. 3. Concurrence This report has been reviewed by the Municipal Clerk and the Director of Legislative Services who concur with the recommendations. 4. Conclusion It is respectfully recommended that the Planning and Development Committee recommend to Council to repeal Town of Newcastle By-law 83-83 and approve the by- law to constitute a Committee of Adjustment in Attachment 2. Staff Contact: Anne Taylor Scott, Principal Planner, 905-623-3379 ext. 2414 ataylorscott@clarington.net. Attachments: Attachment 1 ❑ Procedure for Electronic Meetings ❑ Committee of Adjustment Attachment 2 ❑ Proposed Committee of Adjustment By-law Interested Parties: There are no interested parties to be notified of Council's decision. 3 rn • Leading the Way Attachment 1 to Report PDS -006-20 Departmental Procedure App d Procedure Number: C00-004 A ov Date: Title: April 27, 2020 Electronic Meetings - Committee of Adjustment Meetings Revision Date: Purpose To set out the guidelines and procedure followed to conduct electronic meetings for Committee of Adjustment. The authority for conducting electronic meetings can be found in Bill 189, Coronavirus (COVID-19) Support and Protection Act, 2020 amendments to the Planning Act and Ontario Regulation 149/20 Special Rules Relating to Declared Emergency. Currently, these provisions only apply during an emergency, and as such, this procedure is geared to a pandemic situation. Definitions Electronic Participation ❑ means participation by telephone or other electronic means (audio or audio/video). Procedure 1. Prior to the Meeting - General 1.1 All electronic Committee of Adjustment meetings shall be conducted using the video/audio conference solution as determined by the Clerk, Manager of IT and in consultation with the Director of Planning Services or designate. 1.2 The number of applications to be considered at a single meeting shall be determined by the Director of Planning Services or designate. Note, when scheduling the meeting, consideration should be given to the time requirements and anticipated number of public participants such that the meeting does not become unmanageable. Scheduling Meetings 1.3 Two members of the Planning Staff shall be required to attend the meeting -]a Planner to take the minutes and answer questions from Committee Members, applicants and delegates, and another staff member URT+JBF\W,,E P HHWJ ❑ Page 1 of 23 3 rn Departmental Procedure Title: C00-004 Electronic Meetings C Committee of Adjustment Meetings 1.4 The host shall have the ability to mute Members of Committee, staff and any other participants who do not have the floor and/or where the background noise is interfering with the meeting. Members and attendees may also be asked to mute their video (where applicable), at some point during the meeting, in order to improve bandwidth. 1.5 The host will schedule the meeting as soon as possible such that the meeting ID is created and can be included in the notices and agendas. The electronic invitation to Committee Members, and all necessary staff, shall be sent at the time of scheduling the meeting. Meeting Option Set-up 1.6 Appendix A to this Procedure details the meeting option setup, using Microsoft Teams. Meeting Notifications 1.7 All Notices to include a statement such as the following: Agendas for Committee of Adjustment can be found in the Agenda 6 F FOLIIRI VgHL& RP P NW HVL[E F-ESQJ H -L httos://www.clarinaton.net/en/town-hall/committee-of- adiustment.asp Members of the Public may participate in the Meeting online or via telephone. The Meeting will start at 7:00 PM. If you wish to participate, anytime after 6:30 PM, you may join the meeting by clicking on the Join Meeting now link at the top of the Meeting Agenda, or you may call into the meeting by calling 289-274-8255. Alternatively, please be advised that rather than participating in the meeting, you may submit your comments in writing by emailing to EEELRJI 1.8 Notification of the Meeting will be issued per the standard protocol via Canada Post, on the property and on the website. Should it be deemed appropriate by the Director of Planning, consideration will be given to also posting a notice in a prominent area within the community in close proximity to the subject property. As well, Notice of the Application and the meeting details shall be posted on the subject property. Page 2 of 23 3 rn Departmental Procedure Meeting Agenda Title: C00-004 Electronic Meetings C Committee of Adjustment Meetings 1.9 The electronic agenda will be posted on the website as per the standard protocol, EE -P DLM:J VQH1DJH CDARANHAOIl11JV_LHSDLR HLWclerks@clarington.net 1.10 Any staff comments, reports, presentations or supporting materials (such as maps, images, etc.).) shall be posted on the website as part of the Agenda, or as soon as possible after the agenda is published in advance of the meeting. 1.11 The meeting agenda shall include a copy of the F� FUAGJ IO 1-11-MIXESHLONEIVE well as the link and telephone number at the to be used to join the meeting. Technical Support 1.2 Arrangements may be made with IT Staff to have them available for the first, or first couple of meetings, at least 30 minutes before the start of the meeting, and for the first 30 minutes of the meeting, to provide assistance to the Committee Members participating in a meeting by electronic means with establishing the electronic connection, if needed. 1.3 If communication is lost for any Committee Members during the meeting, every effort will be made to reestablish the connection. The Chair shall call a five minute recess. Should a Member have difficulty in establishing a connection, they will be encouraged to participate via telephone. 2. Logistics for Committee Members 2.1 The Chair shall lead the meeting and where possible, be present at the designated meeting location (with the Council Chambers being preferred) supported by the two Planning Staff and IT. 2.2 Committee Members will be requested to join the meeting 15 minutes prior to the start time to ensure that any connection issues can be resolved prior to the scheduled start of the meeting. 2.3 Committee Members participating in a meeting by electronic means shall mute their electronic device and when they are not speaking. 2.4 Once recognized by the Chair, the Member shall unmute their microphone prior to speaking so that all participants/attendees are able to hear what the Member is saying. Page 3 of 23 3 rn Departmental Procedure Title: C00-004 Electronic Meetings ❑ Committee of Adjustment Meetings 2.5 Committee Members participating in a meeting by electronic means will be noted L❑44HP L XWV DM11SlU NH PFD V_L 2.6 A Committee Member may be allowed to join a meeting after the meeting has been called to order providing quorum was achieved prior to the member joining. 3. Logistics ❑ Staff 3.1 Staff participating in a meeting by electronic means shall mute their electronic device and turn off their video when they are not speaking. 4. Public Participation 4.1 In accordance with Provincial legislation and Orders, members of the public are not permitted to physically attend the Meeting. Members of the public therefore are limited to participating electronically either by joining the meeting via the electronic meeting or via telephone by calling and connecting into the electronic meeting. 4.2 There is no requirement for a member of the public to register to speak at the meeting. 4.3 Members of the public who wish to comment on an application, are encouraged to provide those comments in writing to planning @clarington.net prior to the meeting. Any comments received in advance of the meeting shall be listed on the Committee Agenda as per the standard process. 4.4 Members of the public who wish to participate (ie. just listen in) in the meeting can join the electronic meeting by clicking the Join Meeting Now link on the agenda or by calling into the meeting using the telephone number and meeting ID as detailed on the agenda and notice for the meeting. 4.5 Members of the public who join the meeting after the application they are interested in was heard by the Committee, shall be advised that the Committee has made its decision. The person may be added to the interested parties list and shall receive a copy of the decision and have the right to appeal should they wish. 5. During the Meeting - Opening Remarks 5.1 After the Chair calls the meeting to order, the Chair will make the following remarks to all those that are participating: Page 4 of 23 3 rn Departmental Procedure Title: C00-004 Electronic Meetings C Committee of Adjustment Meetings Li Remind everyone to have their phones and/or devices muted (for both video and audio) unless they are wishing to speak. F1 Explain that the meeting is taking place through Microsoft Teams, and that some are participating through vide and audio and are visible, while others are participating through audio only. L Explain that the Chair will ensure that the meeting will take a slower pace, such that each item will be stated and then a moment will be given to allow everyone time to find their place. F- Explain to the members of the public who are in attendance, but who did not receive a Notice of the Meeting, and who wish to be added to the Interested Parties List, they must email the Planning Department at planning@clarington.net or by calling 905-623-3379 ext. 2405 to provide their contact information (name, address, telephone number and email address). We do not want them providing that personal information during the meeting. 5.2 The Chair will then proceed to conduct the meeting beginning with the standard introduction to the rules and procedures of the Committee. 6. Processes During the Meeting 6.1 The Planner (ie meeting host) shall monitor attendees to ensure their mics are muted (unless they are speaking) to minimize disruption to the meeting. 6.2 The meeting host shall display any reports, diagrams, maps, etc. as deemed necessary by sharing their screen such that the members and other attendees may see the information. 6.3 Where there is a person attending the meeting via telephone, the Planner shall ensure that they clearly articulate what is being displayed, such that the person on the telephone may follow along should they have a copy of the item (as it would have been posted earlier on the website along with the meeting agenda). 6.4 To ensure transparency during a meeting, no Committee Member shall communicate through the chat feature within the electronic meeting system. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest 6.5 Members who declare an interest in an application to be considered by the Committee shall declare so and mute their microphone and their video during that portion of the meeting. Page 5 of 23 3 rn Departmental Procedure Delegations Title: C00-004 Electronic Meetings L Committee of Adjustment Meetings 6.6 The Chair shall ask the applicant or their agent to speak to the Committee. The host will unmute the applicant/agent. 6.7 The Chair shall then call upon any member of the public in attendance (i.e. joined into the meeting or called in) if they wish to speak the application. 6.8 The meeting host shall then monitor the Participant List in the electronic meeting system, to determine which participant is speaking up. The Participant List will H a1JL-C-1FMV&—lHAfdUISKR-1H-FXP EHURIOM�SHWR Vname. Note: Where there is a number of people wishing to speak, it will be incumbent on the Chair, in cooperation with the host, to keep track of those who wish to speak while ensuring that all those who do wish to speak get their opportunity. 6.9 The Chair shall then recognize the person and grant them the floor. 6.10 The Chair shall call on each Committee Member in alphabetical order to ask any questions. Once all members have had their questions answered, the Chair shall then proceed to call the vote. Moving a motion 6.11 The Chair will ask for a motion on the application. -&D❑qLKDYH[D[P FWELRL1�P V DSS(FDNfiU' ❑ 6.12 A Committee Member who wishes to move or second a motion, will simply speak up -VOLLJ ANH.LLDP HLD GLAARCKFL❑J AKSH UP RAMI J FFrH RHL6 P L\KL I move to DSSLRYHV4FiI-DSSffD\R 7 6.13 The chair will then ask for a seconder to get the motion on the floor. Speaking to a Matter 6.14 The Chair will canvass the Committee Members of their intention to speak to a matter on the floor and will notify the Committee Member when it is their turn to speak. Eg. We have a motion moved by Joe Smith, seconded by Betty Brown to approve the application. Is there any Committee Member wishing to speak to the P Fes' ❑ 6.15 Prior to speaking to the motion, the Committee Member shall state their name. Once all members have had an opportunity to speak to the motion, the Chair shall call the vote. Page 6 of 23 3 L Departmental Procedure Title: COO-004 Electronic Meetings L Committee of Adjustment Meetings Calling the Vote 6.16 The chair shall call the vote by stating the motion and then proceeding through each Committee Member to give them the opportunity to vote in favour or RSS ❑ARAP -iF P FU -( J TF-, 7 LC-RFFFDZWNRN [1W I[ P RJR-R-DSSL YH❑ \ffiVDSSQFDARL-0 HP EH11�"-L-\NH-LL L(aDLV❑ F I LIHV 110 HP EH -U' I_I_I_ NHm ❑L®❑V❑HUS M/ -RL 1IRS] EH XAt DUP HP E YH-Ybted. • 1 : It i� 1�(o>_r�i 0, '.1�'�1 llQ,� 1111'1 1111111' It �• �,• � ■ Leaving the Meeting 6.18 A Committee Member participating in a meeting by electronic means shall inform the Chair about their intentions to leave the meeting either on a temporary or permanent basis. 6.19 A Committee Member participating in a meeting by electronic means shall be deemed to have left the meeting when they are no longer electronically connect to the meeting and are unable to reconnect. However, every effort shall be made to attempt to assist in reconnecting. Where this situation arises, the Committee may resolve to table the remaining portion of the Agenda and reconvene. Concluding the Meeting 6.20 At the conclusion of the meeting, the Chair shall, T announce that the meeting is now concluded, L remind members of the public to email Plan ning(a)-clarington.net or call 905-623-3379 ext. 2405 to provide their contact information should they wish to be included on the Interested Parties List and receive a copy of the decision for that particular application, • '!1 /' �� /x(1)1'!1 ■Illi ■� r"� •• � Page 7 of 23 3 TF❑❑ Departmental Procedure Title: COO-004 Electronic Meetings L Committee of Adjustment Meetings Appendix 1 User Guidelines L For Committee Members and Staff 1. How to schedule an MS Teams Meeting 1.1. The meeting host shall schedule the meeting and actively manage the system throughout the meeting. 1.2. Click on MS Teams purple icon. 1.3. Click on calendar Page 8 of 23 3 CF] Departmental Procedure Title: COO-004 Electronic Meetings L Committee of Adjustment Meetings 1.4. The calendar will display. Click on the desired date and start time of the meeting and the meeting detail screen will display. 00 L. Search or type a command New meeting Details scheduling Assistant Time zone: (UTC -05:00) Eastern Time (US &Canada) v ,�R �dd title 9 Add required attendees + Optional Apr 21, 2020 8:00 PM Apr 21, 2020 8:30 PM v 30m 40 All day Does not repeat Add channel Q Add location B I U A A Paragraph v TR = = 77 Qco Type details for this new meeting 1. ( A%MO-iP I-HIWJ MODV-1& RP P U*HIR EIGMAR HOA HDU ILI] X DSSQFUIVREVEID X being the number of applications to be considered. 2. Enter in the email addresses for each of the committee members and any required staff. 3. Enter the start time and anticipated end time for the meeting. 4. In the details box, enter the application numbers in the order in which they are going to be considered. 5. Then click on Save in the upper right corner. Note, once it is saved the meeting is scheduled, and those invited will immediately receive an email invite F1 which will include a link to join the meeting and a telephone number & meeting ID number which they call and enter when they are ready to join the meeting. Page 9 of 23 3 rn Departmental Procedure Title: COO-004 Electronic Meetings L Committee of Adjustment Meetings 2.1. The host must now set up the meeting settings. 2.2. Go to your Teams Calendar (as set out in steps 1.2 and 1.3 above) 2.3. Click on the scheduled meeting, and the meeting details screen will display. You will notice that now there is a new option DYDLQE3EEII DI MARS -1 ViHA/FLFH❑ELP H -W LS I J test C of A #1 Chat Files details Scheduling Assistant Meeting notes Whiteboard X Cancel meeting Time zone: [UTC -95;04] Eastern Time (U5 & Canada) v Meeting options test C of A #1I 2.4. Click on the Meeting options. A new webpage will open on your screen. test C of A #1 0 April 20, 2020 2:30 PM - 3:00 PM o Greentree, Anne Meeting options Who can bypass the lobby? Always let callers bypass the lobby Announce when callers join or leave Who can present? People in my organization v No Yes QD Only me v Saye • �1i111 /'1.■1. !.� "1 C� ■ IID"IIi� 's1:11■1� ■■ 0 00I0071110RAIS IN 00 N'■ LVA 111 2. t1:I��7 M1•'D1'■lI '■ it is filled in) Page 10 of 23 3 E[1❑❑ Departmental Procedure Title: COO-004 Electronic Meetings L Committee of Adjustment Meetings 3. Set [ILI ❑dRC❑FH❑I KHI1 ❑[Rl BDH[ H" DIVA sure it is filled in) � • ■�1��4�►/C ii��:llilirl�l��1�� I ►�f1]I��i111 5. Save your settings. Once saved, it will show Dcl ile! 2.5. Close that window. And then close the meeting window. Your meeting settings have now been saved. 3.1. The host will start the meeting at least 15-20 minutes before the meeting start time. 3.2. Following steps 1.2 and 1.3 above, go to your teams meeting calendar and click on the scheduled meeting. The meeting details screen will display. Click on Join in the upper right corner of your screen. Page 11 of 23 3 rn Departmental Procedure 3.3. The following screen will be displayed. Title: C00-004 Electronic Meetings C Committee of Adjustment Meetings 3.4. Click on Join Now and you will be in the meeting. Page 12 of 23 3 rn Departmental Procedure Title: C00-004Electronic Meetings L Committee of Adjustment Meetings 4.1. Click on the people icon in the floating menu on the screen (the floating menu is activated by wiggling your mouse on the screen). The participants screen is displayed. People lInvite someone or dial a number (c) - Currently in this meeting (1) reentree, Anne ip Organizer - Others invited (3) V0Gallagher, June No response AGamble, Theresa No response 5.1.7 RP X\N-D SDLWBDFM KVFG NRIAP -I1JAP HILIAW SDIIISDEVVI screen and select mute. 5.2. To mute aartici ant click on the ® to the right of the p p 9 SDLWLSDI VVLEDP H- GA+iFWP X H7 Page 13 of 23 3 rn Departmental Procedure Title: COO-004 Electronic Meetings L Committee of Adjustment Meetings 6.1. When a person who is held in the lobby they must be admitted into the lobby by the host. In the people window, you can see that the people held in the lobby are listed. To admit them into the meeting, click on the 0 6.2. Note,❑KOFDIFSHUR❑COEEmthey cannot hear the meeting, until they are admitted. Invite someone or dial a number (cb - Waiting in lobby (1) M Michelle Truest CurTentiy in this meeting (1) reentree, Anne 0 Organizer - Invite others from conversation (1) V• Chambers. Michelle 7.1. The host ends the meetingb clicking on the ® in the floating Y 9 9 tool bar and M-OREW ILHE P H-WJ M Page 14 of 23 3 E[1❑❑ Departmental Procedure 8.1. *6 to unmute the phone 9. Troubleshooting Title: C00-004 Electronic Meetings C Committee of Adjustment Meetings 9.1. Echo ❑ If there is someone in the meeting that has joined and they have their sound coming out of more than one device, you may get an echo. Have the person mute their devices. The best way to prevent an echo is to use ear buds/ a headset when possible. 9.2. No one can hear me ❑ , I ffW1UiFCF-DEOAR]EH[HDL LAWR 1-114U ❑ here are a few steps on how to check your microphone. Move your mouse over or tap the Teams meeting screen, this will show your Control Bar. Check to see if your microphone is muted. A muted microphone will have a diagonal line across the If your microphone is unmuted and you are still unable to be heard, you can check Teams device settings right from the meeting. To do so bring up the Control Bar, click the three horizontal dots (More Actions button), then click Show device settings at the top of the menu. The Device Settings menu will now appear on the right side of your window. The third option in the Device Settings panel is where you can select which microphone Teams is using. If you have more than one option try selecting each one until your meeting members are able to hear you. Page 15 of 23 3 rn 2 Show device settings Show meeting notes t o Enter full screen Show background effects E9 Tum on live captions (preVievi) Keypad 0 Start recording � End meeting PI Turnoff incoming video 10:14 W4 r -O 41 Device settings Audio devises Custom Setup Speaker Speakers (Conexant HD Audio) 11} Microphone Microphone {?-- USB PnP Sound Devi... \/ Microsoft LifeCam HD-3DOD %/ Mee#Ing settings Private viewing On Allow participants to move through shared presentations on their own Departmental Procedure Change Input Volume. Title: C00-004 Electronic Meetings C Committee of Adjustment Meetinqs Page 18 of 23 Departmental Procedure Title: COO-004 Electronic Meetings ❑ Committee of Adjustment Meetings settinas Device properties I Desktop Microphone I Rename Ji ❑ Disable Volume C LO.J D100 Test You can also click the Test button to see if Windows is able to hear you. Page Break Microphone Privacy Settings. Some devices may prevent the microphone from being used due to their privacy settings. You can allow selected applications access to your microphone by following these steps. Start by opening your Settings application. You can do this by clicking the windows icon in the bottom left corner of your screen, type settings, then select the Settings application. Page 19 of 23 3 [[E❑❑ Departmental Procedure Title: C00-004 Electronic Meetings C Committee of Adjustment Meetinqs Page 20 of 23 Departmental Procedure Title: COO-004 Electronic Meetings ❑ Committee of Adjustment Meetings On the left side of the window, under App permissions select Microphone. Settings p Home Find a setting Privacy Windows permissions 8 General ftt Speech j Inking & typing personalization R� Diagnostics&feedback Genera Change privacy options Let apps use advertising ID to make ads more interesting to you based on your app activity [Turning this off will reset your ID.) O Off Let websites provide locally relevant content by accessing my language list M On Let Windows track app launches to improve Start and search results M On Show ine suggested content in the Settings app 40On �i Activity history Know your privacy options App permissions Learn how this setting impacts your privacy. Learn more LTj Location Privacy dashboard Privacy statement 01 Camera �icrophone Have a question? Voice activation Managing Microsoft account privacy settings On the Microphone privacy settings page please make sure that Allow apps to access your microphone, and Allow desktop apps to access your microphone are both on. Page 21 of 23 3 IIE❑❑ Departmental Procedure Title: COO-004 Electronic Meetings L Committee of Adjustment Meetings Allow maps to access your microphone If you allow access, you can choose vvhich apps can access your microphone by using the settings on this page. Denying access blocks apps from accessing your microphone. On Allow desktop apps to access your microphone Some apps and Windows features need to access your microphone to work as intended. Turning off this setting here might limit what desktop apps and Windows can do. Go On Page 22 of 23 3 U❑❑ Departmental Procedure Title: COO-004 Electronic Meetings L Committee of Adjustment Meetings Appendix 2 u Tips for participating Before the Meeting ❑ What not to wear - Avoid stripes or bright colours, solid colours are best. ❑ What to wear Attire suited to that type of meeting i.e. Council Business Attire. ❑ Be prepared. Have your agenda package or reference materials ready. You can also use your phone or tablet as an extra screen for your agenda. ❑ Avoid messy or distracting items or areas in view of your camera. ❑ Ensure your workspace is quiet and that you will not be interrupted. ❑ Turn off your phone or set to mute and do not check your phone while on camera. Getting Started F Log -on to the meeting 5-10 minutes early to make sure your audio and video are working. L Check your lighting. Try to have light beside or behind your computer to illuminate your head and shoulders. Be cautious with natural light to avoid a silhouette effect. F Adjust your screen for a head and shoulder look and during the meeting do not lean into your computer as viewers may see closeups of your chin. Strange angles can be a distraction. ❑ Using one of the provided backgrounds may cause less distraction to the viewers or ask if there is a corporate background that could be provided. ❑ If you wear glasses, adjust your screen brightness to reduce glare. During the Meeting F Look straight in the camera when speaking to make eye contact with the viewers. It helps them to know you are engaged in the conversation. ❑ Keep your body movements to a minimum as it can pixelate and degrade the picture. ❑ There is about a 40 second lag time between the meeting and the Iivestream so be cautious if you are watching on another device as your body language should be appropriate to the item under consideration and not what you see on the Iivestream. L Keep your microphone muted unless you are speaking. Optics ❑ Ensure your beverage does not look alcoholic or like a beer can. ❑ Plastic water bottles may send the wrong message, consider using a glass, mug or reusable bottle. Page 23 of 23 3 rn Attachment 2 to Report PDS -006-20 If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. ■■1 'll1 ►"■11, I ■ 111,1T4;1 111 II)1NOEVMN 11■■■N Being a by-law to constitute and appoint a Committee of Adjustment for the Municipality of Clarington pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended Whereas Section 44(1) of the Planning Act provides that if a municipality has passed a by-law under section 34, the council of the municipality may by by-law constitute and appoint a Committee of Adjustment; And whereas Council passed Resolution #GG -230-20, arising out of Report CLD -011- 20, to authorize remote participation for local board meetings; And whereas Council deems it necessary to approve a Committee of Adjustment By-law to allow the Committee of Adjustment to participate electronically in meetings and establish updated provisions as described in PDS -006-21; And whereas the Resolution #GG -230-20 directed that the Terms of Reference for all Council Advisory Committees be amended to allow for electronic participation up to, and including, all members and members of the public; Now therefore the Council of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: That the Committee of Adjustment appointed by Council pursuant to Town of Newcastle By-law 83-83 Town of Newcastle is hereby continued. 2. The Committee of Adjustment shall be composed of six (6) persons appointed by Council. 3. The members of the Committee of Adjustment who are not members of a municipal council shall hold office for the term of the Council that appointed them and the members of the committee who are members of a municipal council shall be appointed annually. 4. Members of the Committee of Adjustment shall hold office until their successors are appointed, and are eligible for reappointment, and, where a member ceases to be a member before the expiration of his or her term, the Council shall appoint another eligible person for the unexpired portion of the term 5. Three members of the Committee of Adjustment shall constitute a quorum. Page 1 of 3 3 rn Attachment 2 to Report PDS -006-20 6. The members of the Committee of Adjustment shall elect one of themselves as chair, and, when the chair is absent through illness of otherwise, the Committee may appoint another member to act as acting chair. 7. The Committee shall appoint a secretary -treasurer who shall be an employee of the Municipality. 8. The members of the Committee of Adjustment shall be paid such compensation as Council may provide from time to time. 9. The secretary -treasurer shall keep on file minutes and records of all applications and the decision thereon, and of all other official business of the Committee. 10. The Committee of Adjustment, upon the application of the owner of any land, building or structure affected by any by- law as passed pursuant to Section 34 or 38 of the Planning Act, or a predecessor of such sections, or any person authorized in writing by the owner, may, despite any other act, authorize such minor variance from the provisions of the by- law in respect of the land, building or structure or the use thereof, as in its opinion, is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure, if in the opinion of the Committee, the general intent and purpose of the by- law and of the Clarington official plan, are maintained. 11. In addition to its powers under section 9, the Committee of Adjustment, upon any such application, a. where any land, building or structure on the day the by-law under section 34 or 38 of the Planning Act was passed, was lawfully used for a purpose prohibited by the by- law, may permit: the enlargement or extension of the building or structure, if the use that was made of the building or structure on the day the by-law was passed, or a use permitted under subclause (ii) continued until the date of the application to the Committee, but no permission may be given to enlarge or extend the building or structure beyond the limits of the land owned and used in connection therewith on the date the by-law was passed; or the use of such land, building or structure for a purpose that, in the opinion of the Committee, is similar to the purpose for which it was used on the date the by-law was passed, or is more compatible with the uses permitted by the by-law than the purpose for which it was used on the date the by-law was passed, if the use for a purpose prohibited by the by- law or another use for a purpose previously permitted by the Committee continued until the date of the application to the Committee, or Page 2 of 3 3 rn Attachment 2 to Report PDS -006-20 b. where the uses of lands, buildings or structures permitted in the by-law under section 34 or 38 of the Planning Act are defined in general terms, may permit the use of any land, building or structure for any purpose that in the opinion of the Committee, conforms with the uses permitted in the by-law. 12. A member of the Committee of Adjustment can participate electronically in a meeting. 13. A member of the Committee of Adjustment who is participating electronically in a meeting may be counted in determining whether or not a quorum of members is present at any point in time, and the member can participate electronically in a meeting that is open or closed to the public. 14. The following by-laws are repealed: 83-83, 86-8, 89-223, 92-1, 95-7, 98-7, 99- 158, 2000-04, 2001-006, 2004-015, and 2007-027. 15. That this by-law shall come into force and effect on the date of its passing. Passed in Open Council this day of 2021. Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk Page 3 of 3 3 rn If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 The Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington By-law 2021 -XXX Being a By-law to exempt Lot 5 of Registered Plan N632 from Part Lot Control Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control, for Lot 5, in Plan N632 registered at the Land Titles Division of Whitby ; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands described in Paragraph 2 within the By-law. 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply to Lot 5 in Plan N632. 3. This By-law shall only be used to create 2 single detached lots and 1 retained lot described as Parts 1 to 3, inclusive, as follows: Lot 1 Part 1, Plan 40R31106 Lot 2 Part 2, Plan 40R31106 Lot 3 Part 3, Plan 40R31106 3 rn 4. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-law shall expire on the earlier of a) be in force for a period of two (2) years ending on January 19, 2023; b) the date on which a transfer has been registered respecting each lot contemplated in Paragraph 3 of this by-law. Passed in Open Council this 18th day of January, 2021. Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk 3 TFIFI 10 7 4 O1674 67Jo# O 00 O O O 1676 T.- ~ ~ ~ NASH ROAD Part Lot Control Location Map (Courtice) N - Area Subject To Zoning By -Law w 11 Fourth Avenue, Courtice E s ZBA2020-0003 si m u N r ti oP ti (0 ti rn (9) 3wmas 0131AH:)1b 83 38 Lu Lo rn co ti Lo c9 N 00 (0 N O Lo Lo Cfl ti ti O m m m d7 N— �� 34 W a 30 = 26 c~c 22 LOA. 00 O CD `o LO N LO a7 0- 18 WESTMORE STREET - - LL.,L 10 7 4 O1674 67Jo# O 00 O O O 1676 T.- ~ ~ ~ NASH ROAD Part Lot Control Location Map (Courtice) N - Area Subject To Zoning By -Law w 11 Fourth Avenue, Courtice E s ZBA2020-0003 si m u N r ti If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. ■111'F.'l11 ►"■1�� \�1�1■[II ■ �11;1�11�� 111 II)11■ Being a By-law to exempt a certain portion of Registered Plan 40M-2614 from Part Lot Control Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to exempt from Part Lot Control Part of Block 12, Plan 40M-2614, being Parts 13 and 14, Plan 40R-30960 registered at the Land Titles Division of Whitby (File # ZBA 2020-022); Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington enacts as follows: 1. That Subsection 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall not apply to those lands described in Paragraph 2 within the By-law. 2. That this By-law shall come into effect upon being approved by the Municipality of Clarington and thereafter Subsection 5 of Section 50 shall cease to apply Part of Block 12, Plan 40M-2614, being Parts 13 and 14, Plan 40R-30960. 3. Pursuant to Subsection 7.3 of Section 50 of the Planning Act, this By-law shall be in force for a period of one (1) year ending on January 18, 2022. Passed in Open Council this 18th day of January 2021. Adrian Foster, Mayor June Gallagher, Municipal Clerk 3 rn