The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPD-191-87.~1 ~.~" 1.i,w~1l IK~ .V,1~ 1 ~, ~~ ~ ~'~ TOWN OF NEWCASTLE ~~~~ REPORT File # ~,~~,- ~/~; ~ ~~~ Res . # .~~-~~,~ By-Law # NEETII~: General Purpose and Administration Committee DATE: Monday, July 6, 1987 T #: PD-191-87 FII.F #: 18T-86038 CT: PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION FILE: 18T-$6038 SCHICKEDANZ BROS. AND VELTRI 8 SON RECON~'lENDATIONS: It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PD-191-87 be received; and 2. THAT the proposed red-line revision to Plan 18T-86038, to provide for the relotting of Lots 50 to 66, and Block 67 all inclusive, from semi-detached to single detached lots having a minimum frontage of 15 metres, be approved and, the Region of Durham and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs be so advised. BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS: On May 26, 1987 a delegation of residents from Liberty and Concession Streets in Bowmanville appeared before the Regional Planning Committee in respect of the subject draft approved Plan of Subdivision. The residents appeared to outline their concerns relative to same and asked for specific considerations with respect to the design of the Plan. The Regional Planning Committee received the delegation and requested that Councillor Hubbard meet with the residents and the developer in an attempt to resolve the residents concerns. ...2 C~) REPURT NO.: PD-191-87 Page 2 ~ meeting was convened on June 16, 1987 at which time considerable discussion took place relative to the residents' concerns. At the conclusion of the meeting it was agreed that Mr. Bob Schickedanz would examine the implications of revisions to the Plan of Subdivision, particularly a change from semi-detached lots to single detached lots abutting existing residential development on Concession and Liberty Streets. Nir. Schickedanz subsequently advised Staff that they were willing to undertake such a revision in order to provide the transition zone requested by the residents. It is therefore recommended that the subject plan be revised, as shown on the attachment hereto, to provide for the relotting of Lots 50 to 66 and Block 67 inclusive, to provide for the development of this area as single detached lots. It is noted that Lot 66 on the draft approved plan will now have to be shown as a block reserved for future development inasmuch as the Region of Durham has advised that sanitary sewer services are unavailable at the present time. In addition to the concern with respect to the type of housing development to take place, residents expressed a concern about access routes and it was pointed out that, while in the short term Street 'A' provides the sole access for the subdivision, long term development of this area could include an easterly connection to the Penwest Developments Plan of Subdivision. This option was generally supported by the residents and, accordingly, Staff will undertake to provide for such a connection when considering further revisions to the Penwest Plan of Subdivision and development proposals for the intervening lands. A third concern expressed by the residents was the adequacy of the Concession Street services, particularly the road surface and sidewalks; a particular concern being a potential conflict between pedestrian and vehicular traffic, given the narrow travelled surface of the road in this location. ...3 ~(~~ ~- REPORT NU.: PD-191-87 Page 3 Staff indicated that pedestrian access from the subdivision to the school sites to the south would be provided to the south thus reducing the need for school aged children to travel on Liberty or Concession Streets. In the long term, however, it is recognized by Staff that Concession Street will have to be upgraded to reflect its status as an Arterial Road at which time sidewalks will be an essential component of the redevelopment and up grading. In addition to the site specific concerns of the residents, two additional concerns of a general nature were identified relative to the use of cash-in-lieu payments or recreational lot levies to improve the quality of life in this neighbourhood and an examination of the Town's goals relative to the upgrading of other services, schools, parklands and playgrounds, in an orderly nature. These concerns would, of course, be addressed through capital budget, and as a neighbourhood proceeds to develop or redevelop, priorities should be assigned to these components of the neighbourhood structure in order to minimize the timelag between occupancy of new dwellings and the provision of the necessary community facilities. Staff have reviewed the proposed redline revision and support same. We note, however, that in consideration of the redesign, Lots 60 to 63 inclusive may require minor variances for lot area due to the constraints of the subject lands in terms of the depth between the proposed streets and the existing residential lots to the north. Staff have no difficulty in supporting these variances in view of the circumstances and would hope that the residents would similarly support them at such time as any public meeting is held in respect of same. Recommended for presentation to the Committee -. ~ ~ ~ . ' ~ , Lawrence E. Kotseff Chief Administrative Of f cer TTE*jip *Attach. June 29, 1987 THIRD CONCESSION LOT // LOT /O LOT 9 NpR~_"; ~~ h I LOT 8 ~ LOT 7 ~~~>~. LOT 6 ,~. I i ?? r ,- ~ r~ ~~ -~ . i ' - .lIM1T OF CORRECTfOAICC-TN5TI7V~e'------ /';S{ =~..:.:.:~ f- .. i>: >a4t:SM1 y W ' }:;{:{.ii:n... ~ - iTJ::ii ~v~ :::~:. r „%`•~;~;:>a' ~ay~~;:`;Si:':•:`::=~`• CORRECTIONi4. ~M:?i:;~~;~~>:~kx?:~:;y~t:;:h~~=`:~::~• of INSTITUTE :}\iv?::>ai.:r~'v:vir' ': i:,..:...,ti-:~1iv:>yd•_~.}i:. '~+ ,.2-:`tom::::::.::.•x:'t:::,.t45::,,.. >x; ~:.......,~ - ' _ ~ ~ ~•..,2„`~>a`._Xy{• > a t > ~ CONCF. SS/ON t - -- -- _ '~;,,:~,;;;: ~-~~ CONCESSION STREET - ~'CONCEJS/ON 4 - .. ~ ~~ ~ i t I {P` 4 ., i x' _ a - •- - . ~ i( ' - ~ .~ ` ~ , • ~G,REENNOUSES ~' ~ - ~ ~ i PARK , I ~ _ I -. -- KING STREET j HIGNk'4Y . ~' ~ I ~.. , .Fg3PILl, ~ ~ ~ ~ ',\ 1. .- - ' ~ ~ • ~ SCALE Sno Iso ,o ~ '300 -AE;?RES ~~ :I~EY:~PL/aN` ~ { 1 k .~ ~ PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ~~' ;. ., r ~ .~~~_ _._..~:,_~_ ~~.,~ ..-~:~.. .~ ~.~.._.,~ , _..~. _~ ~~-,.~ a~ ~~ _~ -- ~- ~ _ _ -._ ~ - - - -s ob_a ~~ ,~ ~Qi 1,~3a1S ' Z oa'e£ M„oz,oioelN -~ ~ dos=>i - , I N b'OZ ~ 1 b'OZ•' b'02 61 b%OZ!. '6Z OZ ~ ~ ti ~ M ro M ! N, °n C1 ro aD , M / ~ C., ~ - -~- -~ I I <t I I N \ __ ~~ ~ ~ 6'6Z 6'6Z ~ 6•gZ 6' m ~ \ °° ' ~4 .L I , ~i - a ~ ~ ~ M ~ M ~ wV ~ /~ ' ,, r i ~ Y j P t: L ~ ~ s - L.J ~~ m m ` O N mr ~. ~ ~ ~ .. W ~ ~ -. U o _- _ ._._. _ ~ I N W ~8 6Z ~ ~'6Z 8'6Z ~ ..Z r ~~ o ~ ..._ - -~ f cj I- ~ -- ---ztS N , ' ~ ~ W w ~ ;d~ nD 4 p_ L~ I m I ~ F ~4/ 4J 'Vs' ~N N w ; ~ . ~z ~ _ % %' i 001'8£ M„OZ,I£oLIN - ~ 'tN ~ ~~" ;~i _J , W 3AN3p3Y W p,Q ~~. ~ _ / `•a°----- b69 OZ ~ .' ,469, ~ ,. 4 ; OF m 0~ ~~ ~ 019.' N - (na se~oov bvaodwat) _ ~ ~ ti tpa ss3pavl~lyaodw3t I {~ z ,'Na~cias ' 7AY3t L! ~ 3AY353Y W p•o L z L sz z ,, L.6 rrr ~001'6£~ M„OZ,I£ LIN ~-" p ~"~~LQZ'9Z j' ~b~8 £ -~~ b106£ ~ - IIpZ' ~ .. ~ fit.; f r p ,, !: } ~• o _ M~~09 IZpLiN ; (1 M~,OO,Z£ LIN M„OZ 9ZoB1N < h~04Y9o81N /~~/, m ~ i~ :- J I t ~ '~}. ~,'~ .~ 'i .-rte ..>'; ~• = IIIJJJ _ U l 1 ~; ~_ J W -r~ 'a ~ ti , .pr ~ ' ~ ~ W. 001'8£ M„Ob,LZoLIN .~~K1 /.,pi .~• ,~, ~..._-~.... ~ J, _I.. rZl Z ~ M„05,BZoLIN '~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ y .'~ i ~~ ~ ~•, - T-,- Vii,:.; -I. L- J °'' <s a .,t a W \ ~.-~ ~ 4 O I ~\~~ y r W + p rC ,~ , r ~ r, ~, .r. r.~) r ~ I ~~ ~619'L9.~ M Op8$r}L~i+~~' I'- 1 Ir~ 'd• y':- 1 ~ ~ ~:.,- J ~ ~ , ; r~-- ~--~--- ----.T~ ~:~.-._._ ,; 133 ail , . S Jl.~, a3~ l"1 ' .' ' i',', •.' r ,i; I qr, ' ~ ~ „..