HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-165-87~.1~ . '-~
TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
v c~~>
REPORT File # Or;~,~=//
Res . # „~ ~ ., ° .'~
By-Law #
NEFfING: General Purpose and Administration Committee
DATE: Monday, June 15, 1987
T #: PD-165-87 FILE #: 18T-78027
CT: DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 18T-78027
PROPOSED ttEVISIONS
PART LOT 26, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TWP. OF CLARKE (NEWCASTLE VILLAGE)
WILSWAR ENTERPRISES
REC0~9hiENDATIONS:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-165-87 be received; and
2. THAT the Ministry of Municipal Affairs be advised that the Town of Newcastle has no
objections to the proposed revisions to Plan 18T-78027, prepared by Donevan and
Fleischmann, Job No. 1-7282, dated May 14, 1987, illustrating 111 lots for single
family dwellings, 58 lots for linked dwellings, a park block and additional blocks
for street widening, and 0.3 metre reserves.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENT:
On June 4, 1987 the Town received a copy of Plan 18T-78027 as revised, from the Ministry
of Municipal Affairs requesting the Town's comments prior to their consideration of the
request to amend the draft conditions of approval as issued in 1982. Staff would note for
the Committee's information that the draft approval, as issued, has received the necessary
extensions; most recently being considered by Committee and Council April 6 and 13, 1987
respectively.
...2
r ~~)
REPORT NO.: PD-165-87 Page 2 ~v°
In reviewing the proposed revisions, Staff would note that the densities
proposed would comply with the appropriate provisions of the Newcastle
Village Ufficial Plan based on a 15 persons per gross acre ratio. It is
furthermore noted that the proposed revisions would affect the draft plan by
altering the road pattern slightly through the deletion of a cul-de-sac and
re-alignment of the park block entrances.
Staff would note that the draft conditions as previously issued did provide
special consideration to the Canadian Pacific Railway along the northerly
lot line as it affected housing construction. Staff would anticipate that
the Canadian Pacific Railway, in reviewing the most recent plan, would
impose similar considerations and restrictions on lots 74 through 92.
In reviewing the draft conditions of approval as previously issued, Staff
would confirm that the requirement for the entering into a subdivision
agreement and provisions related thereto, would be consistent with the
present requirements imposed through draft approval. Staff would note that
Block 142 as highlighted on the revised plan would provide for the possible
extension for residential development easterly of the subject lands on lands
designated for residential development within the Newcastle Village Official
Plan.
Accordingly and in consideration of the above-noted comments, Staff would
have no objections to the proposed revisions as illustrated on the Plan of
Subdivision 18T-78027 prepared by Donevan and Fleischmann, Drawing No.
1-7282, dated Nlay 14, 1987.
Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
awrence otsef
Chief A i strati ve Of ficer
LDT*TTE*jip
*Attach.
June $, 1987
CC: Veltri and Son Ltd.
1038 Pinetree Court
OSHAWA, Ontario
L 1K 1P4
LOT 27
R1-1
Rl-1
,
~~
~c~~ ~~
LOT 26
LOT 2 5
v /° ~ ~
o . ~~ tai ~ ~~;~,
~_
so,.,
,i N
Z
O~
;~ - ~
W
U
~, Z
U'
- II
~~
~ ~~
t
....
.~
z ~ ~-
~~_, ~~r -~,q
-~ ~-- . ~ ~ p ``'-oy
•~_... ~
® ®; ~ ~® ~S
~.
• ~
(~ ~ ®r Q .~o.~
J ~ _ .r
n r~~ //6 //5 //4 i/ //~ /// /
•Fj.S K.6 .IG,S . fq S W v~ 4
/s .._._._ _,cs ,g _.
~ O
O
O
~~
-~
O O O~ // /2 /3 ~ ~
q
.9s O~ ~ O O O O ~ 3/ O ~J O O~ O O
~ ~ ~ ®g by ~ ~
O•~ ~ O /8 ~ w n O O ~ -az 4~ ~ ~
~~~
-~l37S~ _.. _. ..IS,75 .__. 5.73 t//5~.7~5] ~ /5.73 ~ 6.75 ~ 2/ 2~
O i
`_~r .ci /43
•S'/G.vw.av .w. 2
. ,.. (~
10 i.s9e
.~iLp~
f42
n N
0 ~ ~ ~.5
~®
®° '~ tn4
®°: ~
~~J
/
~ ~~
~O
6/ O 6`
P
~a
S
1 Y
Y V ~
i
A
QO ~ - ~
~ 4U
3
`~
~ ,
;:: -<®
~~
~,
-,-- ~..-
.-~-
~,,
~V~~ti•
li'.`~ {
~ _ w. ~ l
• ~ '~
t j ~ '%
~ _ )~J
I"'
~~
1!~ .
(,.
~i
fiG
-a--