Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-10-22 PD MinutesClaringjton If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Co-ordinator at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131 Planning and Development Committee Minutes Date: October 22, 2019 Time: 7:00 PM Location: Council Chambers, 2nd Floor Municipal Administrative Centre 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario Present Were: Mayor A. Foster, Councillor G. Anderson, Ron Hooper, Councillor J. Jones, Joe Neal, Councillor C. Traill, Councillor M. Zwart Staff Present: M. Marano, F. Langmaid, C. Pellarin, K. Richardson, A. Burke, J. Gallagher, S. Gray, R. Maciver (arrived at 7:05 PM) 1. Call to Order Councillor Neal called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. 2. New Business — Introduction There were no new business items added to the Agenda. Alter the Agenda Resolution # PD-143-19 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Councillor Anderson That the Agenda be altered to consider Presentations from Dale Leadbeater, SLR Consulting and Lisa Backus and Tracey Webster, prior to the Delegations portion of the Agenda. Carried 3. Adopt the Agenda Resolution # PD-144-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Ron Hooper That the Agenda for the Planning and Development Committee meeting of October 22, 2019 be adopted as presented with the addition of Communication Item 10.4, Emma West, Bousfields Inc., Regarding Report PSD-041-19, Community Vision for Jury Lands, Urban Design Master Plan + Design 1 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 Guidelines for Former Ontario Boys Training School and WWII Prison of War Camp 30 — Amendment No 121 to the Clarington Official Plan. Carried 4. Declaration of Interest 4.1 Councillor Zwart declared an interest in Unfinished Business Item 14.1, PSD-039-19 Exemption Request for 10 Victoria Street from Interim Control By-law 4.2 Councillor Zwart declared an interest in Unfinished Business Item 14.4, Confidential Report LGL-013-19, 10 Victoria Street — Exemption from Part Lot Control 5. Announcements Members of Committee announced upcoming community events and matters of community interest. 6. Adoption of Minutes of Previous Meeting 6.1 Minutes of a Regular Meeting of September 30, 2019 Resolution # PD-145-19 Moved by Ron Hooper Seconded by Mayor Foster That the minutes of the regular meeting of the Planning and Development Committee meeting held on September 30, 2019, be approved. Carried 7. Public Meetings 7.1 Application for a Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment In the interest of expediency, Councillor Neal asked whether there was anyone present to speak in opposition to or in support of the application. No one was present to speak in opposition to or in support of the application. As a result, the Planner did not make a presentation. 7.2 Application for a Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment In the interest of expediency, Councillor Neal asked whether there was anyone present to speak in opposition to or in support of the application. No one was present to speak in opposition to or in support of the application. As a result, the Planner did not make a presentation. Michael Fry, D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited, was present on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Fry thanked staff for their Report. He noted that a traffic study was prepared and identifies a concern at the intersection of Courtice Road and 2 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 Highway 401. Mr. Fry advised the Committee that the concerns at that intersection are not influenced by the proposal and that it is currently operating at a low evel of service. He stated that the application is to amend the setback regulations in the existing Energy Park property to allow for the relocation of the East Penn battery warehouse and head office to the Energy Drive site. Mr. Fry noted that they will address the urban design guidelines and provide landscaping for a visual buffer as there is high visibility along Energy Drive and Highway 401. He advised the Committee that they have requested to increase the setback of the building to 20 meters instead of 8 meters, because of the size of the building and the implications to the streetscape. Jim Bouchard and Mike Bouchard, East Penn Canada Ltd., were present to answer questions from the Committee. 7.3 Applications for a Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment Brandon Weiler, Planner, made a verbal and electronic presentation to the Committee regarding the application. Libby Racansky, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Ms. Racansky explained that she is concerned with the following: 1. The impact on hydrogeology; 2. Missing tributaries recognition; 3. Flooding; 4. Drainage; 5. The impact on wells; 6. Green space in south parts of the neighbourhood; and 7. The developers disregard of cumulative effects on surrounding areas. She displayed photos of the area and highlighted the issues related to approving the application. Ms. Racansky noted that there is an influx of water absorbed by the proposed land and would like this area to be protected to ensure that properties are not flooded. Suspend the Rules Resolution # PD-146-19 Moved by Councillor Jones Seconded by Mayor Foster That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the delegation for an additional 5 minutes. Carried She advised the Committee that flooding is already damaging recently resurfaced Hancock Road south due to the Highway 418 construction. Ms. Racansky played a video of the tributary on Hancock Road. 3 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 Suspend the Rules Resolution # PD-147-19 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Councillor Jones That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the delegation for an additional 2 minutes. Carried She explained that this land needs to be protected as the proposed development will created a negative impact. Ms. Racansky concluded by stating that Council should be creating healthy, safe and sustainable communities, not destroying wetlands, mature trees, tributaries, all of which contribute to the health and well- being of the entire area and its residents. Suspend the Rules Resolution # PD-148-19 Moved by Councillor Anderson Seconded by Councillor Jones That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the delegation for an additional 2 minutes. Motion Lost Tristan Knight, Terrastory Environmental Consulting Inc., spoke in opposition to the application. He made a verbal presentation to accompany an electronic presentation. Mr. Knight explained that he was requested by members of the North Courtice Neighbourhood Association to undertake a review of an Environmental Impact Statement (Dillon Consulting, revised July, 2019) in support of the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendments applications at the northwest corner of Nash Road and Hancock Road in Courtice. He summarized his concerns regarding the Environmental Impact Review as follows: 1. Questionable vegetation community mapping 2. Lack of regard for an apparent surface water drainage feature. 3. Incorrect assessment of woodland significance. 4. Absence of justification of EP rezoning and development within an EPA. 5. Impacts of PSW anticipated by the EIS Report 4 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 Suspend the Rules Resolution # PD-149-19 Moved by Councillor Jones Seconded by Ron Hooper That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the delegation for an additional 2 minutes. Carried 6. Insufficient rationale supporting significant woodland removal 7. EIS is not signed by authors and does not identify field staff Suspend the Rules Resolution # PD-150-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Ron Hooper That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the delegation for an additional 2 minutes. Carried Mr. Knight thanked the Committee for the opportunity to outline the communities concerns related to the natural heritage components of this application. Lisa Kawasaki and Sami EI-Hajjeh, local residents, spoke in opposition to the application. Ms. Kawasaki stated that proposed the frontage of the properties does not match the current homes in the neighbourhood. She is concerned that the application does not include green space. Ms. Kawasaki explained that the park in the neighbourhood is busy and always at capacity. She advised the Committee that this development will not enhance the current neighbourhood. Ms. Kawasaki noted that the developers are trying to construct as many homes as possible to make as much money as possible. She was concerned that there will be an increase in traffic if the application is approved to permit an additional 151 homes, which could potentially produce 300 cars. Ms. Kawasaki expressed concern that this application will increase traffic and reduce safety. She noted that this proposal will destroy the natural habitats of the wildlife in the area. Ms. Kawasaki asked that the Committee to protect the trees and watersheds in the area. Mr. EI-Hajjeh submitted a petition from residents in the area opposing the application with 102 signatures. Dan and Andrea Sheridan, local residents, spoke in opposition to the application. Mr. Sheridan explained that, since the previous developments have been built, the water on his property is not draining. He advised the Committee that, because of the drainage issues on his property, he cannot put his cattle in the lower fields. Mr. Sheridan stated that, if the proposed subdivision goes in, the drainage issue will be worse and result in more flooding. He explained that there 5 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 is nowhere for the water to go if the land is developed. Ms. Sheridan is concerned with the potential increase in traffic and safety issues. Councillor Neal left the meeting. Mayor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. Andy Koornneef, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Mr. Koornneef stated that the proposal does not match the character of the neighbourhood. He explained that he was concerned with the trees on his property which abut the subject lands and that, if the roots will be cut off, the trees will die. Mr. Koornneef would like to know who would bear the cost of removing the dead trees and replacing them. He also explained that he is concerned with the lack of parks and green space surrounding the proposed development. Councillor Neal returned to the meeting. Jacqueline James, local resident, spoke in opposition to the application. Ms. James explained that her backyard floods every spring and this subdivision will only increase the amount of water being diverted into her backyard. She advised the Committee that she is concerned with the increase in traffic, currently it can take her fifteen minutes to get out of her driveway. Greg Gilbert, was present on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Gilbert explained that he is present to listen to the community and their concerns. He noted that this area has been zoned for urban development since 1998. He noted that the developers assembled 13 properties to deliver a comprehensive community, with a mixed density to address affordability. Mr. Gilbert stated that they have matched density with previous developments in Courtice and Bowmanville. He explained that the development will be in close proximity to existing amenities. Mr. Gilbert noted that the 2013 plan did not include an onsite park, because the parkland was assigned to Harry Gay Drive and George Reynolds. He advised the Committee that, as part of the development, one million dollars will be dedicated to parklands for the Municipality to spend. Mr. Gilbert explained that the Provincial Policy Statement, Clarington's Official Plan and the Hancock Neighbourhood Design Plan allows for townhomes along Nash Road and Hancock Road. He noted that access along Nash Road and Hancock Road are an issue and that is why the proposed development does not include driveways along those roads. Mr. Gilbert noted that the consultants have done their due diligence in regarding the wetlands in the area and he supports the recommendations found in the environmental impact study. He advised the Committee that sidewalks will be installed along their property but the remaining portion has been pushed to 2027 by the Municipality. Mr. Gilbert explained that the development will provide more than one on -street parking spot per residential unit. He advised the Committee that the developer has invested one million dollars into cleaning the former auto wrecker's site. Mr. Gilbert answered questions from the Committee. 6 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 Alter the Agenda Resolution # PD-151-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Jones That the Agenda be altered to consider Report PSD-042-19, at this time. Carried Resolution # PD-152-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Anderson That Report PSD-042-19 be received; That the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment submitted by BV Courtice Partners LP (Trolleybus Urban Development) continue to be processed including the preparation of a subsequent report; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-042-19, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision Carried Recess Resolution # PD-153-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Ron Hooper That the Committee recess for 10 minutes. Carried The meeting reconvened at 9:21 PM with Councillor Neal in the Chair. Alter the Agenda Resolution # PD-154-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Ron Hooper That the Agenda be altered to consider Delegations 8.1 and 8.1, at this time. Carried 7 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 8. Delegations 8.1 Tony Kuypers, Regarding Report PSD-046-19, Renaming of King Street in Haydon and a remnant of King Street in Bowmanville Tony Kuypers, was present regarding Report PSD-046-19, renaming of King Street in Haydon and a remnant of King Street in Bowmanville. Mr. Kuypers is concerned with the renaming of King Street in Haydon and does not support the recommendations contained in Report PSD-046-19. He submitted a survey from residents, regarding their opposition of renaming King Street in Haydon. Mr. Kuypers explained that residents were not receptive to the name change and do not want to go through the lengthy process again, as there postal codes changed in early 2019. He advised the Committee the reasons of public safety and errors being made for deliveries, are not supported by the community. Mr. Kuypers stated that the change should have happened at the same time as the postal code changes. 8.2 Personal information redacted per the Redaction of Personal Information Policy -- for further information contact the Municipal Clerk S.14(1) , Regarding Report PSD-046-19, Renaming of King Street in Haydon and a remnant of King Street in Bowmanville S.14(1) , was present regarding Report PSD-046-19, renaming of King Street in Haydon and a remnant of King Street in Bowmanville. S. provided the Committee with examples of news articlergof police officers being sent to the wrong addresses due to similar or duplicate street names. He expressed public safety concerns with having duplicate or similar sounding street names, specifically the street names in Haydon and Bowmanville. S.14(1) - stated that, in spring 2018, his postal code changed and it was at that time he requested that his street name also change, to reduce frustrations in the future and improve safety. He explained that a study was done in the 1990's to review the street names in order to eliminate the duplicate street names, and it was decided not to change the name because the municipal addresses in Haydon were in the 8000's, where the Bowmanville addresses along King Street were in the 1000's. S.14(1) stated that many people use cellular devices as their main phone line, which are not always registered to their home and makes it more difficult to determine the person's location. He advised the Committee that Durham Regional Police conducted a search for the word `king" in Durham street names and 47 streets were found. S.14(1) explained that the name change would be much safer and could save lives. He urged that the recommendations contained in Report PSD- 047-19 be approved. S.14(1)1. noted that the Durham Regional Police conducted a search for the words "grass hopper" and there were none. s. concluded by stating that leaving two King Street's in Clafiipgton is dangerous and the Committee should support the recommendation to rename the streets. 8 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 8.3 Dale Leadbeater, SLR Consulting, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19 Next Steps on Zone Clarington Dale Leadbeater, Principal Ecologist, SLR Consulting, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19 Next Steps on Zone Clarington. Ms. Leadbeater made a verbal presentation to accompany an electronic presentation. She explained that she was asked by the Municipality of Clarington to provide comments on Environmental Protected lands as an environmental consultant. Ms. Leadbeater provided the Committee with a background of her 30 year career and experience as an environmental consultant. She stated that, when looking at a landscape, it is important to define the constraints, and use the environmental protection layer and natural heritage systems a reference. Ms. Leadbeater provided an example of how she would conduct an assessment of a landscape using the environmental protection layers and the constraints identified as well as their importance. She advised the Committee of a case study regarding floodplain hazards and their implications. Ms. Leadbeater expressed the importance of understanding the features that need to be evaluated for protection and/or enhancement of lands. She provided an example of a Provincially Significant Wetland flooded when a stormwater pond was built in an area of shallow groundwater resulting in no storage capacity. Ms. Leadbeater stated that the natural environment is only one layer and that Environmental Protection (EP) is important when considering land use change. She stated that EP does not interfere with existing functions and that it is an early warning system for landowners interested in development. Ms. Leadbeater advised the Committee that the Official Plan requires that a Vegetation Protection Zone (VPZ) be applied to the feature, however there is flexibility built into Policy to show or not to show VPZ. She answered questions from the Committee. Resolution # PD-155-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Ron Hooper That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Committee to speak for a second time. Carried 8.4 Lisa Backus and Tracey Webster, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19 Next Steps on Zone Clarington Tracey Webster, was present regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19 Next Steps on Zone Clarington. Ms. Webster made a verbal presentation to accompany an electronic presentation. She explained that Official Plan mapping is done at a very large scale and is not meant to be reviewed at a property specific level. Ms. Webster noted that the zoning by-law implements the Official Plan policy at a smaller, property level scale which allows for the opportunity to identify environmental features with more precision. She stated that the Official Plan contains policies that acknowledge that the Environmental Protection Area can be refined through the application and 9 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 approval process for proposed developments. Ms. Webster explained that applicants are not required to amend the Official Plan where refinements have been identified and policy 14.4.7 provides a further opportunity for refinement at a site specific scale even after the ZONE Clarington process is completed. She noted that the draft Zoning By-law contains a regulation which indicates the boundary of the EP zone represents the actual limits of the environmental features and the minimum vegetation protection zone. Ms. Webster stated that the limits of environmental features are determined through consultation with the appropriate Conservation Authority and review of a relevant study or evaluation where necessary. She advised the Committee that, depending on the location and magnitude of a proposal for new development and its proximity to environmental features, the scope of the study or evaluation would vary. She mentioned that, in some cases, little to no study is required, as expert staff at the conservation authority can provide a simple "sign -off review" at a desk top level for very small-scale projects such as decks or accessory structures and/or additions that are outside of features and for which no conservation authority permit approval is required. Ms. Webster noted that the EP zone implements the Environmental Protection designation in the Official Plan with more precision than conceptually shown in the Official Plan maps. She explained that the EP zone in Zoning By-law 84-63 only covers what had been identified as flood plain when it was created 35 years ago and mapping capabilities have improved greatly in the past 35 years. Ms. Webster advised the Committee that there has also been greater recognition of the importance of protecting our Environmental features. She stated that policies from the Province require greater protection of all environmental features, and include woodlands, wetlands, valleylands, fish habitat, areas of natural and scientific interest, beach bluffs and floodplains. Ms. Webster noted that this has resulted in proposed comprehensive changes to our EP zone from the area covered by Zoning By-law 84-63 and the approach in the draft zoning By-law is similar to what has already been implemented on the Oak Ridges Moraine Zoning By-law 2005-109. She explained that, when mapping the EP zone, staff made initial refinements to trim areas within woodlands that were cleared for development and are in communication with the Conservation Authorities and Province to obtain additional information that could be used to further refine the limits of environmental features. Ms. Webster noted that they will also use details provided by residents to help make additional adjustments. She advised the Committee that a process has been established to review environmental features in the proposed zoning at the request of the property owner and to date we have received 61 requests for site visits for 89 properties. Ms. Webster noted that, in addition to these requests, they have received 95 submissions noting concern with EP zoned lands on properties where a site visit was not requested. She explained that site visits will be conducted where the property owner provides consent and that, in some cases, a site visit will not be needed because of the initial desktop review. Ms. Webster provided an overview of the recommended process for site -specific reviews. She stated that Provincial Policies require the evaluation of development within the EP zone, the 30-metre minimum Vegetation Protection Zone and the 10 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 Environmental Review Area regardless of whether these areas are shown on the proposed zoning map. Ms. Webster proposed that the Site Plan Control By-law be amended in tandem with the new zoning by-law. She provided an overview of the Oak Ridges Moraine Zoning By-law 2005-109, and how it can be used during this process. Ms. Webster displayed four potential options for mapping buffers related to environmental features. She concluded by stating that opportunities exist to refine the EP Zone, protection of environmental features is required by provincial law, improvements to the Site Plan Control By-law and approval process are proposed and that refined and accurate mapping helps to communicate rules. She answered questions from the Committee. Resolution # PD-156-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Anderson That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to allow Members of Committee to speak for a second time. Carried Suspend the Rules Resolution # PD-157-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Traill That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to extend the meeting until 2:00 AM. Carried Recess Resolution # PD-158-19 Moved by Ron Hooper Seconded by Councillor Traill That the Committee recess for 5 minutes. Carried The meeting reconvened at 11:32 PM with Mayor Foster in the Chair. 8.5 Gord Robinson, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C- 333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington Gord Robinson, was present regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington. Mr. Robinson is concerned with how new zoning will impact rural areas and agricultural areas. He noted that, if a motion from the previous term of Council had been passed, the public would have been notified when the Official Plan was adopted and he would not be here tonight. Mr. Robinson stated that he is concerned that 50% of land was rezoned to Environmentally Protected (EP) with the approval of the 11 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 Official Plan using outdated maps. He asked how Councillor Hooper would feel is his store was zoned EP without notice. Councillor Hooper left the meeting. Mr. Robinson noted that he has continually asked for proof that the lands are to be designated EP. He questioned why SLR Consulting was present tonight and what their intent was. Mr. Robinson explained that they will be hosting a public meeting on Thursday, October 24, 2019 at Faith United Church. He advised the Committee that no letters have been sent to residents and they deserve to be notified. Mr. Robinson urged the Councillors to support Resolution #C-333-19, item 14.2 of the Agenda. Councillor Hooper returned to the meeting. 8.6 Marvin Stapleton, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C- 333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington Marvin Stapleton, was present regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington. Mr. Stapleton explained that he is a sixth generation farmer in the Municipality of Clarington. He noted that Council are elected officials and should do what is best for the residents. Mr. Stapleton stated that the maps need to be corrected before moving forward. He advised the Committee and staff to do the preparation work in advance and so that they will be prepared for the future. 8.7 Scott Stevens, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C- 333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington Scott Stevens, was present regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington. Mr. Stevens was concerned that the proposed Zone Clarington changes will negatively affect farmers. He explained that these changes are adding more layers of bureaucracy to farmers in Clarington. Mr. Stevens stated that he previously met with staff, Councillor Zwart, Councillor Hooper and Councillor Anderson and would like them to take the concerns expressed seriously. He asked Staff why the Zoning By-law was being reviewed he was advised it needed to be completed within three years of the approval of the Official Plan. Mr. Stevens suggested that Zone Clarington should not proceed and address the issues being raised. He explained that he had property with no buildings but, with the proposed changes, he will not be able to build on that land in the future. Mr. Stevens stated that agricultural is not constant, and farmers have to be able to adapt, Zone Clarington will cause a restriction. He concluded by advising the Members of Committee he is concerned with how the rural farming industry will be affected if these restrictions are put in place. 12 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 8.8 Dan Zegers, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333- 19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington Dan Zegers, was present regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington. Mr. Zegers thanked Councillor Neal for his presentation at the October 7, 2019 Council meeting, and thanked the Councillors for their time and commitment on this matter. He noted that he believes that Staff do not have the time to focus on this workload. Mr. Zegers is concerned with the amount of time this matter is taking up for himself and many property owners. He suggested that the Municipality be proactive and join the Municipality of East Gwillimbury in their appeal and advise the Provincial Government of the Municipality's concerns. Mr. Zegers stated the Clarington's MPPs feel the policy is flawed and should be revisited before implementation. He expressed his disappointed in the Mayor's approach on this matter. He suggested that current farming practice won't be able to continue if the EP lands are implemented. Mr. Zegers explained that Clarington's logo says "leading the way", and would like the Municipality to "lead the way" so others can follow. He advised the Committee that, if letters are sent to all the land owners that may potentially be affected by the proposed changes, it should contain the following: 1. current mapping of specific property 2. proposed mapping as per environmental features, specific to property 3. written descriptions of current environmental features on land that require protection 4. explanation of why changes are required to protect the features 5. provide a way to verify features and a clear process for dispute and resolution to address deficiencies He concluded by asking the Members of Council to take the time to correct the decisions that have been previously made by Council. 8.9 Steve Chandler, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C- 333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington Steve Chandler, was present regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington. Mr. Chandler explained that 6500 properties are affected by the proposed changes, which results in a minimum 520 million dollar loss in property value. He stated that a cost benefit analysis shows a result of all cost and no benefit. Mr. Chandler advised the Committee that the rural lands are not changing and in 10 years they will be the same. He noted that there is no added value to the wildlife habitats because there will be no changes to the properties. He stated that there should be impact studies done that highlight the adverse effects on property owners. Mr. Chandler explained that these proposed changes will negatively impose life altering impacts on residents of Clarington. He concluded by advising the Committee that it is their duty to mitigate the negative impacts to residents. 13 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 8.10 Theresa Vandergaast, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington Theresa Vandergaast advised the Municipal Clerk's Department, prior to the meeting, that she would be unable to attend as a delegation. 9. Communications — Receive for Information Resolution # PD-159-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Ron Hooper That Communication Items 9.1 to 9.6, be received on consent, with the exception of Communication Item 9.1. Carried 9.2 Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services, Region of Durham, Regarding Envision Durham — Environment and Greenlands System Discussion Paper Report #2019-P-36 9.3 Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services, Region of Durham, Regarding Envision Durham — Engagement and Outreach — Public Opinion Survey Summary Report #2019-P-35 9.4 John Paul Newman, Director of Corporate Services/Clerk, Township of Scugog, Regarding Provincial Policy Statement Review - Response to Draft Policy Revisions 9.5 Megan Fletcher, Acting Deputy Clerk, Municipality of West Elgin, Regarding Provincial Policy Statement 9.6 Courtenay Hoytfox, Development and Legislative Coordinator, Township of Puslinch, Regarding Provincial Policy Statement Review 9.1 Ralph Walton, Regional Clerk/Director of Legislative Services, Region of Durham, Regarding Employment Lands Servicing Project Status Report #2019-EDT-15 Resolution # PD-160-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Traill That Communication Item 9.1, be received for information. Carried 14 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 10. Communications — Direction 10.1 Brian Bridgeman, Commissioner of Planning and Economic Development, Region of Durham, Regarding Provincial Policy Statement Review, Proposed Policies Report #2019-P-42 Councillor Neal left the chair. Mayor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. Resolution # PD-161-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Ron Hooper That the following resolution from the Region of Durham, regarding Provincial Policy Statement Review, be endorsed by the Municipality of Clarington: That Commissioner's Report #2019-P-42 be endorsed as Durham Region's response to the Environmental Registry's posting (ERO #019- 0279) for the Provincial Policy Statement Review — Proposed Policies, including the following recommendations: i) That, for clarification purposes, the term "Provincial Interest" be defined in the PPS, or that a reference to section 2 of the Planning Act be included; ii) That a policy be included in Policy 1.1.1 that encourages the preparation and implementation of community energy plans as a component of planning for healthy, liveable and safe communities; iii) That the term "market -based" in Policy 1.1.1.(6) be revised to "market informed" to better reflect the provincial policy -led planning system, and the Region's long-term planning objectives that support the provision of affordable and supportive housing, while encouraging a more compact urban form that is sensitive to local conditions; iv) That the Province be requested to either release an updated Land Needs Assessment guidance document, or confirm the existing draft document, to help the Region advance Envision Durham, the Region's Municipal Comprehensive Review; v) That the PPS continue to use the word "shall" in policies 1.1.3.6, 1.1.3.7 and 1.6.7.2 to assist with the implementation of orderly and sequential development and complete communities; vi) That the references to Section 2: Wise Use and Management of Resources and Section 3: Protecting Public Health and Safety of the PPS be reinstated in Policy 1.1.3.8 to ensure that the review of Settlement Area boundaries is systematic, well planned and comprehensive; 15 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 vii) That natural heritage and hydrologic systems be added as criteria for consideration in the adjustment of Settlement Area boundaries to ensure that these reviews are systematic, well -planned and comprehensive and in sync with the Growth Plan; viii) That the proposed wording changes to the land use compatibility policies in Policies 1.2.6.1 and 1.2.6.2 not be supported, as the changes could lead to greater conflict between sensitive uses and industrial/manufacturing uses; ix) That the Province be requested to provide additional guidance regarding the appropriate transition area, or distance separation, between industrial and manufacturing uses and non -employment uses, including providing additional clarity regarding Places of Worship that are regarded as sensitive land uses; x) That the term "regional economic development corporation" in Policy 1.3.2.5 be changed to "Planning Authority" to be consistent with other policies in the PPS; xi) That the Province be requested to confirm whether it intends to release updated population and employment forecasts for the Greater Golden Horseshoe that would allow the Region to use a 25- year planning horizon in its Municipal Comprehensive Review; xii) That the Province clarify that the upper -tier planning authority is the level which has responsibility for ensuring residential growth can be accommodated for a minimum of 12 years, and that the three-year supply of residential units is also maintained at the Regional level. In addition, it should be clarified that the upper or single -tier municipality would be responsible for defining the "regional market area"; That the proposed wording changes to Policy 1.6.6.3 be revised to address and safeguard the financial and operational risks to a municipality associated with privately -owned communal services; xiv) That proposed Policy 1.6.6.7 of the PPS be deleted related to the integration of stormwater and water/sewer planning, as the responsibilities of municipalities in single -tier and two-tier systems differ; xv) That Policy 1.6.7.5 not be deleted as its removal is inconsistent with the PPS overall, as the Province and municipalities are to support the timely planning and implementation of transportation infrastructure improvements, coincident with the scale and pace of development, and the failure to provide this statement does not support the principle of promoting transit supportive development; Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 xvi) That, for clarification purposes, the term "wayside" not be deleted from the heading in Policy 2.5.5, as the policy is specific to wayside pits and quarries; xvii) That the Province provide guidance regarding how excess fill can be managed by the planning and development approvals process and suggest that excess fill can be managed through engineering approvals for developments following the draft approval stage; xviii) That the definition of the term "conserved" remain the same as per the 2014 PPS to recognize that municipalities do not have the authority to "approve" or adopt archaeological and heritage impact assessments; and xix) That a reference to climate data be added to the definition of "impacts of a changing climate". B) That a copy of this report be forwarded to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, and Durham's area municipalities and conservation authorities. Referred Resolution # PD-162-19 Moved by Joe Neal Seconded by Councillor Traill That the item 10.1, be referred to the next Regular Council Meeting dated October 28, 2019. Carried Resolution # PD-163-19 Moved by Joe Neal Seconded by Councillor Jones That Communication Items 10.1 to 10.2, be referred to the consideration of Unfinished Business Item 14.2, Resolution #C-333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington. Carried 10.2 Ric Gulka, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C- 333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington 10.3 Vera Spange-Koukidis, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington 17 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 10.4 Emma West, Bousfields Inc., Regarding Report PSD-041-19, Community Vision for Jury Lands, Urban Design Master Plan + Design Guidelines for Former Ontario Boys Training School and WWII Prison of War Camp 30 - Amendment No 121 to the Clarington Official P Resolution # PD-164-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Jones That the item 10.4, be referred to the consideration of Unfinished Business Item 14.3, PSD-041-19, Community Vision for Jury Lands, Urban Design Master Plan + Design Guidelines for Former Ontario Boys Training School and WWII Prison of Ward Camp 30 - Amendment No 121 to the Clarington Official Plan. Carried 11. Presentations 11.1 Steve Usher, SLR Consulting, Regarding Report PSD-047-19 Clarington Transformer Station, Peer Review Steve Usher, SLR Consulting, was present regarding Report PSD-047-19 Clarington Transformer Station, Peer Review. Mr. Usher provided an update on the Clarington Transformer Station from 2018 to September 2019. He explained that here have been no further Community Liaison Committee meetings mandated since 2017. Mr. Usher noted that the Clarington Transformer station has been on line for several years and no further site visits have been requested of, nor conducted by, SLR in the reporting period. He advised the Committee that SLR staff conducted two site visits, attended one public meeting, and reviewed the 2017 Annual Monitoring Report (by Stantec on behalf of Hydro One) on Clarington's behalf and no new well owner complaints were received in the reporting period. He stated that here have been no adverse effects of the Transformer Station construction and operation on private wells. Mr. Usher noted that the existing groundwater monitoring program will conclude October 31, 2019. He advised the Committee that Hydro One has offered a two year extension of the private well monitoring program for interested residents. Mr. Usher explained that they have learned a lot about the hydrogeology of the site over the past few years providing additional scientific knowledge for the G360 researchers, and provided an update on the bore hole research. He advised the Committee that SLR has been available to answer questions and review the findings on behalf of resident's private wells monitoring reports by Hydro One. Mr. Usher mentioned that one final annual report, for 2019 is expected to be issued by Hydro One in early 2020. 18 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 11.2 Dale Leadbeater, SLR Consulting, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19 Next Steps on Zone Clarington The Presentation was considered earlier in the meeting during the delegation portion of the agenda. 11.3 Lisa Backus and Tracey Webster, Regarding Unfinished Business Item 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19 Next Steps on Zone Clarington The Presentation was considered earlier in the meeting during the delegation portion of the agenda. 12. Planning Services Department Reports 12.1 PSD-042-19 Applications by BV Courtice Partners LP (Trolleybus Urban Development) for a Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit 151 subdivision at the north-west corner of Hancock Road and Nash Road in Courtice. Report PSD-042-19 was considered earlier in the meeting during the public meeting portion of the agenda. 12.2 PSD-043-19 Proposed Rezoning to permit East Penn battery facility located at 1840 Energy Drive, Courtice) Resolution # PD-165-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Jones That Report PSD-043-19 be received; That the proposed application for Rezoning ZBA 2019-0016 continue to be processed including the preparation of a subsequent report; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-043-19, and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Carried 12.3 PSD-044-19 Application by Werrcroft Farms to Amend Zoning By-law 84-63 and Zoning By-law 2005-109 to Facilitate a Surplus Farm Dwelling Severance, 6115 & 6171 Vannest Road Resolution # PD-166-19 Moved by Ron Hooper Seconded by Mayor Foster That Report PSD-044-19 be received; That the application to amend Zoning By-laws 84-63 and 2005-109 continue to be processed and that a subsequent report be prepared; 19 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-044-19 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Carried 12.4 PSD-045-19 Applications by Werrcroft Farms Ltd. to amend the Clarington Official Plan and Zoning By-law 2005-109 to facilitate a surplus farm dwelling severance at 8800 Middle Road, Darlington Resolution # PD-167-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Ron Hooper That Report PSD-045-19 be received; That the Municipality of Clarington has no objections to the approval of Regional Official Plan Amendment 2019-003 to allow the severance of a non -abutting surplus dwelling; That Amendment No. 118 to the Clarington Official Plan as contained in Attachment 1 of Report PSD-045-19 be adopted; That the application to amend Zoning By-law 2005-109 be approved and the By- law contained in Attachment 2 of Report PSD-045-19 be passed; That the Region of Durham Planning and Economic Development Committee and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation be forwarded a copy of Report PSD-045-19 and Council's decision; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-045-19 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Carried 12.5 PSD-046-19 Renaming of King Street in Haydon and a remnant of King Street in Bowmanville Resolution # PD-168-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Traill That Report PSD-046-19 be received; That the By-law shown in Attachment 1 to Report PSD-046-19 be approved to: a. rename King Street in Haydon to Grasshopper Park Road; and b. rename the remnant portion of King Street in Bowmanville to Kings Hill Lane; That all affected landowners receive a goodwill payment, in accordance with the Municipality of Clarington's Goodwill Payment Policy for Municipally Initiated Street Name Changes, to recognize the inconvenience and time associated with the street name changes; 20 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 That a copy of Report PSD-046-19 and Council's decision be forwarded to the Durham Regional Police Service and the Durham Regional Planning and Economic Development Department; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-046-19 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Carried 12.6 PSD-047-19 Clarington Transformer Station, Peer Review Update Resolution # PD-169-19 Moved by Ron Hooper Seconded by Councillor Jones That Report PSD-047-19-19 be received; and That all interested parties listed in Report PSD-047-19 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision. Carried 12.7 PSD-048-19 St. Mary's Cement Air Quality Monitoring — Options for Retaining an Air Quality Expert Resolution # PD-170-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Jones That Report PSD-048-19 be received; and That funding for an air quality expert be referred to the 2020 budget deliberations. Carried 13. New Business — Consideration 21 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 14. Unfinished Business 14.1 PSD-039-19 Exemption Request for 10 Victoria Street from Interim Control By-law Councillor Zwart declared a direct interest in Report PSD-039-19. Councillor Zwart left the room and refrained from discussion and voting on this matter. Resolution # PD-171-19 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Mayor Foster That Report PSD-039-19, Exemption Request for 10 Victoria Street from Interim Control By-law be tabled to the Planning and Development Committee meeting of November 12, 2019. Tabled 14.2 Resolution #C-333-19, Regarding Next Steps on Zone Clarington Councillor Neal left the chair. Mayor Foster chaired this portion of the meeting. Resolution # PD-172-19 Moved by Joe Neal Seconded by Councillor Zwart That the Zone Clarington amendments to the Clarington Zoning By-laws be abandoned; That Staff shall take all steps necessary to amend Clarington's Official Plan by way of a Municipal Comprehensive Review, and with the Natural Heritage designation in Map D and Environmental Protection Area in Map A of the Official Plan for rural lands being limited to: a. b. c. d. e. f. Provincially Significant Wetland; Areas designated by CLOCA as being within a floodplain (red line on CLOCA maps); Areas designated by the GRCA as being within a floodplain; Land designated on the current Region of Durham Official Plan, Schedule B Map B-1 as containing Key Natural Heritage and Hydrologic Features; Land which is Significant Woodland; and Such other key natural heritage and key hydrologic features, natural hazards, and 30 metre minimum vegetation zone not included in (a) to (e) which are (i) mandated by provincial legislation or the Regional Official Plan; and (ii) which have specifically been approved by Council; prior to the submission of the Official Plan Amendment to the Region of Durham; 22 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 That Planning only notify rural property owners and residents regarding the Official Plan changes that were approved by the Region of Durham in 2017, by Canada Post mail personally addressed to each of the landowners registered on the title for each property affected for those (i) living in Clarington; and (ii) to owners outside the Municipality and that the notice include what cannot be done on the Environmental Protected portion of their land as a result of the proposed Environmental Protection and that the notification clearly state what is happening on their property as a result of the zoning changes; That any amendments to the Official Plan in furtherance of this Resolution shall be at no cost to the landowners for application fees; That, in accordance with the Budget Policy, Staff are authorized to re -allocate budget allocations to fund the communication in paragraph 3; Prior to commencing a comprehensive amendment to the Clarington Zoning By- laws, staff report to Planning Committee on the proposed EP Zoning changes, including mapping; and that if necessary an extension be requested from the Minister; That Report PSD 040-19 be received, and that all interested parties listed in Report PSD-040-19 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision; and That Council's decision and a copy of Report PSD-040-19 be forwarded to the Region of Durham, CLOCA, the GRCA, and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Yes (3): Councillor Jones, Joe Neal, and Councillor Traill No (4): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Ron Hooper, and Councillor Zwart Motion Lost (3 to 4) Mayor Foster left the Chair. Councillor Neal chaired this portion of the meeting. Resolution # PD-173-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Anderson That Report PSD-040-19 be received; That staff expedite the site review assessments for the rural area using the process outlined in Table 1 of Report PSD-040-19; and That Resolution #C-333-19 be tabled to the January 13, 2020, allow staff time to prepare responses to the delegations and comments brought forward at the June 24, 2019 Meeting. Motion Ruled Out of Order 23 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 Resolution # PD-174-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Anderson That the foregoing Resolution #PD-173-19 be amended by inserting the words "consideration of matters contained in" before the words "Resolution #C-333-19" in Paragraph 3. Motion Ruled Out of Order Recess Resolution # PD-175-19 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Councillor Hooper That the Committee recess for 5 minutes. Carried The meeting reconvened at 1:17 AM with Mayor Foster in the Chair. Resolution # PD-176-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Councillor Anderson That Report PSD-040-19 be received; That staff expedite the site review assessments for the rural area using the process outlined in Table 1 of Report PSD-040-19; and That Staff Report to the February 3, 2020, Planning and Development Committee meeting to allow staff time to prepare responses to the delegations and comments brought forward at the June 24, 2019 Meeting. Yes (1): Mayor Foster No (6): Councillor Anderson, Ron Hooper, Councillor Jones, Joe Neal, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart Motion Lost (1 to 6) Resolution # PD-177-19 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Councillor Anderson That the rural portion of the zoning by-law amendment be tabled indefinitely. Yes (7): Mayor Foster, Councillor Anderson, Ron Hooper, Councillor Jones, Joe Neal, Councillor Traill, and Councillor Zwart Carried (7 to 0) Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 14.3 PSD-041-19 Community Vision for Jury Lands, Urban Design Master Plan + Design Guidelines for Former Ontario Boys Training School and WWII Prison of War Camp 30 — Amendment No 121 to the Clarington Official Plan Lifted from the Table Resolution # PD-178-19 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Mayor Foster That the matter of report PSD-041-19, Community Vision for Jury Lands, Urban Design Master Plan + Design Guidelines for Former Ontario Boys Training School and WWII Prison of War Camp 30 — Amendment No 121 to the Clarington Official Plan, be lifted from the table. Carried Resolution # PD-179-19 Moved by Councillor Traill Seconded by Ron Hooper That Report PSD-041-19 be tabled to the Council meeting of October 28, 2019, Tabled 14.4 Confidential Report LGL-013-19 10 Victoria Street — Exemption from Part Lot Control Councillor Zwart declared a direct interest in Confidential Report LGL-013-19. Councillor Zwart left the room and refrained from discussion and voting on this matter. Resolution # PD-180-19 Moved by Mayor Foster Seconded by Ron Hooper That Report LGL-013-19, 10 Victoria Street — Exemption from Part Lot Control be tabled to the Planning and Development Committee meeting of November 12, 2019. Tabled 15. Confidential Reports No Confidential Reports 25 Planning and Development Committee Minutes October 22, 2019 16. Adjournment Resolution # PD-181-19 Moved by Ron Hooper Seconded by Councillor Jones That the meeting adjourn at 1:40 AM. Carried Mayor 26 Deputy Clerk