HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-105-93 1°FI CORPORATION O TFf IfV OF tV~IGS`~L
DN: COFA.GPA
tvteeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File .~,~~~C > j~~
Date: Monday, July 5, 1993 Rey. #,~1. ~.9. --~~~ _ 9~.
PD-105-93 A93/017 and A93/018 ~~-~-~`~
Report #k: Fiie
Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR THE MEETINGS OF JUNE 17, 1993
FILE: A93/017 AND A93/018
R~or~rt~enc9ti~n;
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-105-93 be received;
2. THAT Council concur with the decision of the Committee of
Adjustment made on June 17, 1993; and
3. THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario
Municipal Board to defend the decisions of the Committee of
Adjustment in the event of an appeal.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 In accordance with Section 45 of the Planning Act R.5.O. 1990,
all applications received by the Town for minor variance are
scheduled to be heard within 30 days of being received by the
Secretary Treasurer. On June 17, 1993 the Committee heard
two (2) applications for minor variance, tabling one and
dismissing the other. Details of each application and
decision of the Committee is attached for information.
1.2 Application A93/017 was submitted to legalize a second storey
addition to a detached garage which exceeded the maximum
height by 0.76 m (2.5 ft.). Staff inspection of the site
revealed that the detached garage had since been attached to
the house with a bricked enclosure without a building permit.
As a result, the garage was no longer interpreted to be
"detached", but rather "attached". An attached garage is
considered to be part of the dwelling unit where the maximum
~f _...2
,_)IU
inc ei~o~ ~e~ec ro~~
PiIS IS PRiN~E~ IXJ FlEGYGLE~ PA~EII
REPORT NO.: PD-56-93 PAGE 2
height is 10.5 m as opposed to 5.0 m for accessory
structures. The application was dismissed as not being
required.
1.3 Application A93/018 was submitted to permit the construction
of an attached garage to an existing dwelling, thereby
reducing the required 3 m (10 ft.) interior side yard to 1.43
m (4.7 ft.). Staff did not support the application as being
minor in nature or desirable. The Central Lake Ontario
Conservation Authority Staff also did not support the
application as the entire subject lands are floodprone. The
Committee TABLED the application at the proponents request to
allow time for revisions to be made.
1.4 Staff have reviewed the Committee's decision and are satisfied
that the decision conforms to the general intent of the
Official Plan and the Zoning By-law.
1.5 Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment
decision is required in order to afford Staff's official
status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an
appeal of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment.
Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
~-~
j !
~~.v
~.-~,
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P. Lawrence E. Kotself`~,`
Director of Planning Chief Administra ive
and Development Officer ~ ~
CP*FW*cc
*Attach.
28 June 1993
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A93/017
APPLICANT: KARIM HIRJI
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
3729 LAKESHORE ROAD, NEWCASTLE, ONT
PART LOT: 24 CONCESSION: BF
TOWNSHIP: CLARKE
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: RS & EP
HEARING DATE: 17-Jun-93
DECISION:
APPEAL DATE: 17-Jul-93
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO LEGALIZE AN ADDITION TO A DETACHED
GARAGE HAVING HEIGHT LIMIT OF .76M (2.5 FT.) GREATER THAN THE BY-
LAW MAXIMUM OF 5M (16.4 FT.)
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT AS THE APPLICATION APPEARS TO COMPLY WITH THE BY-LAW
REQUIREMENTS FOR A SINGLE DETACHED UNIT WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE
THE APPLICATION BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
'~I~
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A93/018
APPLICANT: JOHN WALLACE
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
52 WEST BEACH ROAD, BOWMANVILLE
PART LOT: 10 CONCESSION: BF
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER: lOM-150 -16
ZONING: RSl
HEARING DATE: 17-Jun-93
DECISION: TABLED
APPEAL DATE: 17-Jul-93
MINOR VARIANCE:
TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CONSTRUCT AN ATTACHED GARAGE TO A
DWELLING SITUATED ON A LOT HAVING AN INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK OF
1.43M (4.7 FT.), MINIMUM REQUIRED 3M (10 FT.)
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE TABLED TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO LIASE
WITH THE CONSERVATION REVIEW BOARD