HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-97-93
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE
DN: DEV93012.GPA
PUB L I C
M E E TIN G
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee
Date: Monday, June 21, 1993
PD-97-93
#:
F'I DEV 93-012
le#:
File #
Res, # ~brJ/J-3g51-9f3.
#
Subject: REZONING APPLICATION - VICTOR HANC
PART LOT 11, CONCESSION 1, FORMER TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE
FILE: DEV 93-012
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and
Administration Committee recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-97-93 be received;
2. THAT application to amend the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive
Zoning By-law 84-63, as amended, submitted by Russ Gibson on
behalf of victor Hanc be DENIED; and
3. THAT the Durham Region Planning Department, and all interested
parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of
Council's decision.
1.4
Area:
DETAILS
Russ Gibson
victor Hanc
From "Urban Residential Type One (R1)" to a zone
appropriate to permit a driveway onto Queen street
to provide additional parking and an accessory
structure, all of which are in association with a
proposed restaurant fronting on King street. The
proposed restaurant with a second storey 3 (three)
bedroom apartment conforms to the zoning by-law and
is not subject to this application.
763 square metres
1. APPLICATION
1.1 Applicant:
1.2 Owner:
1.3 Rezoning:
2. LOCATION
2.1 The property subject to this rezoning application is located within
Part of Lot 11, Concession 1, former Town of Bowmanville. The site
---------____ __________ po sse sse s .the..._foll.ow:illg-1nllU.icipaL_address-i_2B._....Que.ell-stre..e.:t+__..and___i s._______
situated just west of Liberty street. ....2
"'" ,
~.u I
RECYCLED
PAPER
R~~~I~EE
Tl-HS IS PRiNTED ON RECYCLED PAPEIl
REPORT NO. PD-97-93
PAGE 2
3 EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES
3.1 Existing Uses: single family dwelling to remain
3.2 Surrounding Uses:
East - Single Family Residential
West - Single Family Residential
South - Semi Detached Residential units
North - Existing vacant commercial property on which a site
plan application has been submitted proposing the
associated restaurant and residential unit (181
King st.).
4 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
4.1 within both the 1976 and 1991 Durham Plans the lands are designated
Main Central Area. These areas shall provide an array of
community, office, service and shopping, recreational and
residential uses. As such, this proposal conforms to these plans.
4.2 According to the Town of Newcastle Official Plan the lands are
located within the Low Density Residential component of the
Bowmanville Main Central Area. Lands so designated shall be used
for residential purposes and this Official Plan further states that
"It is the intent of the Council to maintain the character of' those
lands designated Low Density Residential". Use of this land for
driveway or access purposes appears to conform to the Official
Plan, however, uses such as parking or an accessory structure
associated with the restaurant would require an Official Plan
Amendment.
5 ZONING BY-LAW PROVISIONS
5.1 According to the Town of Newcastle Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-
63, as amended, the lands subject to the rezoning application are
zoned "Urban Residentiai Type One". Lands so zoned shall be for
predominantly residential uses. Parking and accessory structure
for commercial use is not permitted.
( r
I:~- ; \ --~
,J'J L
REPORT NO. PD-97-93
PAGE 3
6 PUBLIC MEETING AND SUBMISSION
6.1 Pursuant to Council's Resolution of July 26, 1982 and the
requirements of the Planning Act the appropriate signage
acknowledging the application was installed on the subject lands.
In addition, the appropriate notice was mailed to each landowner
within the prescribed distance.
6.2 A number of neighbours have visited the Planning Department
enquiring about this application. Many of these people were
concerned that th property would be used as a parking lot.
Further, a letter was received from the property owner directly
abutting the subject lands. This landowner is opposed to this
application for a number of reasons. Firstly, he notes that if the
egress is to be constructed it would create a hazard for
pedestrians as it would exit between two residential dwellings
which are located very close to the only sidewalk on this part of
Queen street. He also notes the proximity of this entrance to the
intersection of Queen and Liberty streets stating that there have
been numerous accidents at this corner. An increase in the amount
of traffic would be in his opinion hazardous. Concerns about the
noise, dirt and debris from the driveway and the impact on his
property were mentioned, particularly since his house is located
very close to the property line. Lastly, he noted that the owner
has mentioned that a gate may be erected between the commercial and
residential properties to allow for emergency access to the
restaurant. The neighbour is vehemently opposed to the erection of
a gate for either pedestrian or vehicle traffic.
7 AGENCY COMMENTS
7.1 In accordance with departmental procedures, the application was
circulated to obtain comments from other departments and agencies.
The following departments/agencies in providing comments, offered
no objection to the application as filed:
Town of Newcastle Fire Department
Town of Newcastle Local Architectural Conservation
Advisory Committee (LACAC)
....4
ii, l
jJ
REPORT NO. PD-97-93
PAGE 4
7.2 Comments were received from the Central Lake ontario Conservation
Authority. Although they have no objection in principle to this
application they did note that grading must be designed so that
storm water would be contained on the subject property and would
not affect adjacent lands or buildings. Sediment control measures
must also be installed to prevent sediment from washing off the
property during development. Revised plans reflecting these
comments must be prepared and submitted satisfying the Town of
Newcastle and Conservation Authority.
7.3 Comments are outstanding from the following agencies:
Town of Newcastle Public Works
Town of Newcastle community Services
Newcastle Hydro Electric Commission
Durham Region Planning Department
Durham Region Works Department
Ministry of Natural Resources
8 STAFF COMMENTS
8.1 It is noted for the Committee's information that the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs, in commenting on a previous application within
the Main Central Area (United Counties) stated that they would not
consider future site specific amendments thereby extending the
commercial component of the Main Central Area until such time asa
development plan for the Bomwanville Main Central Area is prepared.
8.2 A proposed entranceway for a commercial use exiting in a
predominantly residential area poses serious problems with respect
to the safety of pedestrians on the sidewalk of Queen Street.
Firstly pedestrians would not anticipate commercial traffic between
two residential dwellings. Secondly, the two abutting residential
dwellings are situated very close to the sidewalk limiting the
visibility of the pedestrian with respect to cars exiting the
proposed driveway. In consideration of this application, the
_.____________________c_______~_~!_~!x__oi__1:!1~___<J~_~~~~~_E~_l i ~_~~_~~_E~E~_~~':l_~!__ illlP~E_!~_I1_~e:_~E~_~~_!!1~_t_____
basis alone, the application should not be approved. ....5
r-, l
IJU4
REPORT NO. PD-97-93
PAGE 5
8.3 This report is prepared for the purpose of a public meeting under
the Planning Act and normally Staff would recommend the application
be referred back to Staff for further processing. However, due to
the safety concern of a commercial driveway through a residential
area, Staff is of the opinion that this is a problem which is
unlikely to be resolved nor can it be supported by Staff. Further
processing of this application would appear futile and would not be
to the best interest of all parties. Therefore, it is recommended
that this rezoning application be DENIED.
Respectfully submitted,
Recommended for presentation
to the Committee
r~lv( ~
Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P.
Director of Planning
and Development
HB*FW*cc
Attachment # 1 -
Attachment # 2 -
Key Map
site Plan
15 June 1993
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
victor Hanc
12 Little Avenue
Bowmanville, ontario L1C 1J6
Ken Lynch
24 Queen Street
Bowmanville, ontario L1C 1M2
Russ Gibson
Abbott Gibson Technical Group Inc
172 King Street East
Oshawa, ontario L1H 1B7
, (, r
c" I I Jh.
J ',_)
ATTACHMENT #1
_ SUBJECT SITE
~ OTHER LANDS OWNED BY APPLICANT
I ~~~
\)\)~
BOWMANVILLE
KEY MAP
ee:y;--9S---6-t2
~ I'
I
I
-
o
r----
500m
500 1000 m
I
I
I
~!.
~
!,) rih
'- ~} '-
:'
~:~
i,\
'I
, '.
r
~ Of",
~ ~ ''''L
! 0
tl8,. ";>
'Oi f .E
... ....... .(,,J
r~O\\-
i'C';; fiO,
.:;F{ .~.j
2~'? 1>1:!"
J. i. ~~<
: ~ l I
:1\'1;;1 )-
$1: () t:l:'
_.' xto
~i~ ~O
~ '::IO::l
~\t >
!~~I~~
$ ..I c 0;
~ ~~O
i 10z
t~ n if>
=1
.",
~ 'U
" r
p
Z
t 2 .. ~
,) 8
~
!
J> 5
~ s: ~
~:~
~ n ~
'" -1 - '"
~ 0 E r:;
l' :::0 ~ ;g
~ I '. ~
~ ~.~
;;
~'IW~;~'i ~i~;
j': ',l {'1 ~ rl~ t 1 { ;. .:': ;:
~~I~~ t-~1I; k[gli~
r/ ; J ~ n I~ n ~ ~!
~I P ~ j ~ ~ m \
JI (0, ,,~ &~LOic
~~ I ; ~ f ~ i 1L ~ cll t
!~~Q L 1 ~,~qLJl
t~n,~t Hnd~t
(Q to! pf'l _,J
fl.~~\ <l F d"~!~
~qq; ~~H;t~~
t~r!! Jpr~f
~~d~ ~~~~t~
~~l~f !nd~b
~ [( S t C
~Ii
-g.
,L
ATTACHMENT #2
KING STREET
. __fto
.--~~- '
R' :JI ,I
.'i "~ ~
130 ~ m
~~\'~ ~~ r '
. m~ .lJz I
"13 ~~ i' i
83 '" ,ij I
"'!- il
,,~ ~>>~
~"i-':_'CC - ~ - ,;
~'oo. .. '-::;;.;;;"- -
L_ '
'.1 '
~-:>.,- }
~0L--
'~40Q L
Ji i~
II T"~r
I' l~;:
!t"l~
I z j~
,,'
12:~flOf
IJ ~ I~
r-
J' LOADtNG
,._; ~_.,__.'.~:.o
:z ltet''-2[ ,e.7
~ '~.
I ~ j,~
jl
I~
'.
"
~~
z-;
"",
o
if,
;
.?: '\:"
(~l~
,,~J L~)
'll
~ .
i' ~,
J ,,~I~'
";~j i
! >>~- Ii ~
--,
'" -., ,
..L i'! '
"'''''''
CJz><
~~~
Z Z
~~Q
Q 'b~l .....00 ~
)
QUEEN STREET
LEX,ST,NG RESIDENCESJ
1'6 l\ l\ ~ ~I i'~I~
fo ~ ~ 1 1 '~ ~
~:l -- f iL 2~lk
1 ~ k & t ~ ~::
S' ~ X ' ,.B. ~~i~
~ /) 1 J( ~l
i ( I - "l
l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ li0
" 0 ' t
B 0 'J 1" . ~
I (8 ~' I
,I ~ -
r J J J
(l J ~\ t
i ~ ~'
i i n ~
Q Q }! ~
f ~ ,~z
P ~l ~
1 1 ~ I ~
[k- r
o 0", -
" L ,- ~
p' ~ ~ 0
..N .~::o
iJ .: \) 11-; ~
}~~~':t>
, . 0 " '-j
N '<5
.Z
I", t, 7
,j ',) I