Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD-172-92 i DN: 18T90010.GPA r< Meet„~~: General Purpose and Administration Committee Ffie ~ ~-~ ~p~~° ~c~~'~ Date: Monday, July 20, 1992 ~ - PD-172-92 18T-90010 (X-REF: DEV 90-014) D~®Lat~t Fte~ort Fate Subject: PROPOSED PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND REZONING APPLICATION - RIDDICORP INVESTMENTS LIMITED PART LOT 30, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF DARLINGTON FILE: 18T-90010 (X-REF DEV 90-014) e~rnrn~~ati~r~. It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to Council the following: 1. THAT Report PD-172-92 be received; 2. THAT the proposed Plan of Subdivision application submitted by D.G. Biddle and Associates on behalf of Kiddicorp Investments Limited proposing 250 units be APPROVED as per Attachment # 4 and subject to the conditions contained in Attachment No. 1; 3. THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized by By-law to execute a Subdivision Agreement between the applicant/owner and the Town of Newcastle at such time the agreement has been finalized to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and Director of Planning; ~ 4. THAT the attached amendment to By-law 84-63, as amended, be APPROVED and that the "Holding (H)" symbol be removed by By- law upon execution of a Subdivision Agreement; ~ 5. That the Region of Durham Planning Department be advised of ~ the decision of Council and that a copy of the report be forwarded to the Regional Planning Department. 6. THAT the interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of Council's decision. 1. APPLICATION DETAILS 1.1 Applicant: Kiddicorp Investments Limited 1.2 Agent: D.G. Biddle and Associates Limited ....2 J f / l 9~,«v~~E YI VIS IS' Vlii~flED IXV HFGYCLEU PAPER REPORT NO. PD-17~-92 PAGE 2 1.3 Proposed Plan of Subdivision: proposing to develop 54, 12.0 m frontage single family dwelling lots; 24, 15.0 m frontage single family dwelling lots; 62, 18.0 m frontage semi- detached/link lots (124 units); and 48, 6.0 m frontage on-street townhouse units. Total 250 units. 1.4 Rezoning Application: from "Holding Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to an appropriate zone to permit the above-noted proposed plan of subdivision 1.5 Land Area: 16.7 ha (41.27 acres) 2. LOCATION 2.1 The subject property is located in Part Lot 30, Concession 2, in the former Township of Darlington. The lands are described as being generally south of Sandringham Drive, east of Trulls Road, north of Bloor Street and west of Courtice Road. The applicants total holdings equals 24.69 ha. of which 7.985 ha are currently outside the existing urban boundary and are not subject to the above referenced applications. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 Both the rezoning and proposed draft plan of subdivision applications were received. by the Town of Newcastle Planning and Development Department in January of 1990. The two applications have been circulated and processed concurrently. In support of the proposal, the proponent submitted an environmental noise impact statement to address the projected noise environment for the development and to ...3 } ~ L} REPORT NO.: PD-172-92 PAGE 3 investigate potential noise control features for specific lots. The study suggests Trulls Road to be the only noise source of consequence for the development, and that the noise levels projected from Trulls Road can be mitigated to satisfy Ministry of the Environment standards for all outside amenity areas. 4 EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES 4.1 The subject site is a well vegetated parcel of land with all farm structures having been demolished. 4.2 Surrounding land uses are as follows: South: primarily vacant and agricultural land with a place of worship and limited scattered residential uses fronting on Trulls Road. East: vacant lands subject to residential development applications. North: limited residential uses fronting on Trulls Road, a small commercial establishment and vacant lands subject to development applications. West: existing residential subdivision development lOM- 820, 10M-821 and lOM-834, as well as limited residential uses fronting on Trulls Road. 5 PUBLIC MEETING AND RESPONSE 5.1 Pursuant to Council's resolution of July 26, 1982 and the requirements of the Planning Act, the appropriate signage acknowledging the application was installed on the subject lands. In addition the appropriate notice was mailed to each landowner and tenant within the 120 metre prescribed distance. The required public meeting for the rezoning application was held April 23, 1990. No one appeared in opposition at that time. ....4 ` ..J I i REPORT NO. PD-172-92 PAGE 4 I i 6 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 6.1 Within the existing Durham Regional Official Plan the subject property is designated "Residential" within the Courtice Urban Area. The residential policies allow for a variety of housing styles and types. This application would appear to conform. 6.2 Within the June 1991, Durham Regional Council approved Official Plan, the subject lands are designated as "Living Area" within the Courtice Urban Area. The policies for the living area designation are similar to the residential policies of the previous plan. This application would appear to conform. 6.3 Within. the Courtice Urban Area section of the Town of Newcastle Official Plan the subject property is located within neighbourhood "2C" and designated "Residential". The predominant use of lands within said designation shall be for housing purposes. The application is comprised of blocks for school and park purposes and proposes a total of 250 residential units with a gross residential density of 14.96 units per hectare. The 250 units would generate approximately 725 persons, which may be accommodated within the 2500 person population target. The application provides a range of housing types and appears to be in conformity with the policies of the local plan. 6.4 Within the Courtice South Neighbourhood Development Plan, the subject lands are designated "Residential". A neighbourhood park and elementary school site are also designated in the vicinity of the application and provided for by this application and the abutting proposed subdivisions. It is noted that the Neighbourhood Plan does ....5 ,a }f~~ i REPORT NO. PD-172-92 PAGE 5, not provide any guidance for density. In the absence of specific densities, determination of the number of units to be permitted will be determined based on the population target of 2500 persons to be distributed to all developable areas in the neighbourhood. In this regard, this proposal is in excess of the permitted amount by approximately 36 ' units. However, since the proposed subdivision is adjacent to the designated central area to the north, a slightly higher density for this subdivision is reasonable to take advantage of the various future retail and central area functions and amenities to be located nearby. Staff is satisfied that the slightly higher density proposed does not jeopardize the intent of the Neighbourhood Plan. 6.5 Staff have also reviewed the subdivision within the context of the draft municipal housing policies and is satisfied that the proposed subdivision is providing a variety of housing mix as envisaged by the draft policies. 7 ZONING 7.1 The current zoning on the subject property is "Holding- Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)". Subject to the removal of the holding (H) symbol, said zone would permit the development of both singles and semi-detached/link units on 15.0 and 18.0 metre lots respectively. In addition to the above type of units, the applicant is proposing to develop on-street townhouses and 12.0 m singles. An application for a zoning by-law amendment is necessary. 8 AGENCY COMMENTS 8.1 In accordance with departmental procedure the subject application was circulated to a number of agencies and ....6 ~ / , i I REPORT NO. PD-172-92 PAGE 6, departments for comment. The Separate School Board advised they had no objection to the subdivision application as proposed. 8.2 The Fire Department commented that the site falls within the response area of Station # 4, Courtice. With the continued growth in this area, future expansion to fire protection should address the needs that such growth will necessitate. 8.3 Community Services Department Staff advised they have no objection to the application subject to the following conditions. That the entire neighbourhood park be dedicated to the Town prior to execution of the Subdivision Agreement by the Town. That prior to the owner requesting issuance of Building Permits for more than 50% of the dwellings permitted in this subdivision, access to the park block by ' way of road access or easement which is acceptable to the Director of. Community Services be provided. 8.4 The Town of Newcastle Public Works Department reviewed the subject application and offered no objection in principle to the proposal subject to conditions. Conditions of approval included identifying the location of temporary turning circles and lots which are not eligible for building permits until roads are extended beyond the limits of this plan. The applicant shall ensure all storm drainage works ....7 w :~`i'~ REPORT NO. PD-172-92 PAGE 7 necessary for this plan are to be constructed in accordance with the draft Robinson Creek Master Drainage Study. The applicant will be required to pay the Town for the cost of oversizing the storm sewer and storm drainage works to serve drainage of this plan. 8.5 The Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Staff reviewed the application and advised that subject site is within the Robinson Creek watershed. A Master Drainage Plan was being prepared for the creek at the time of the comments. Authority Staff were not in objection with the principle of the proposed storm servicing scheme, however required further information prior to issuance of final approval. CLOCA Staff also suggested the preparation of a tree preservation report in an attempt to preserve much of the forested cover on the park and school blocks. Authority Staff provided conditions to be included in the draft approval of the application. 8.6 The Ministry of Natural Resources advised they have no objection in principle to the development, however resource concerns were identified. The subject property falls within the Robinson Creek watershed. Said creek provides a habitat for the production of warm water bait fish species. Due to the significance of this fish habitat function Ministry Staff were concerned with the potential for water quality degradation. The developer was therefore required to submit stormwater management plan for the review and approval of Ministry Staff. In addition, a number of conditions were specified for inclusion in the terms of Draft Approval. ....8 ,1~ i ii i III REPORT NO. PD-172-92 PAGE 8, 8.7 The Ministry of Environment noted no objection to the proposal as submitted, however further advised that a well monitoring program would be appropriate in consideration of the well interference which has occurred in the past in this general area. 8.8 The Public School. Board advised that members of the Board of Education raised some concerns over the proposed 250 unit subdivision. The Board has requested that should approval be given, that sidewalks be provided on main interior roads as well as Trulls Road. The Board request assurances that the entire school site be available when the Board is prepared to construct a school. Lastly, the School Board asks that all land owners enter into an option to purchase agreement with the Board prior to registration of the Subdivision Agreement. 8.9 The Region of Durham Works Department advised that the proposed densities could be accommodated within the existing system. Regional Staff requested a 5.18 m road allowance widening across the total frontage of the subject lands on the future regional road (Trulls Road), as well as site triangles and reserves. However, it was noted that a section of 450 mm sewer located beneath Prestonvale Road must be replaced with a 675 mm pipe by the developer at his cost in order for this proposal to proceed. 8.10 Ontario Hydro has no objection to the application provided that any relocations or revisions to Hydro facilities which are necessary to accommodate this subdivision will be borne by the applicant. 9 STAFF COMMENTS 9.1 The application proposes to create 250 units on approximately 16.7 ha of land for a density of 14.9 units per gross ha. Although this density and the number of units ....9 ~9~~ 0 REPORT NO. PD-172-92 PAGE 9, are slightly higher than what the local official plan and neighbourhood plan originally contemplated, this application is deemed to be in conformity. Servicing capacity is available for the lands without negatively impacting the ability to develop future lands in the neighbourhood or in the urban area. Furthermore, the lands are located immediately adjacent to the Community Central Area as designated in the local official plan, and the Main Central Area designation in the Regional Council adopted Durham Official Plan. Lands in this vicinity are likely to develop at a higher density than originally considered in the current Newcastle Official Plan. 9.2 The subdivision is designed in keeping with the neighbourhood plan. It proposes two access points to Trulls Road, provides for a service lane as opposed to reverse frontage abutting Trulls Road and has single family dwelling lots only fronting on the two collector roads (Sandringham and Avondale). As well, in keeping with the neighbourhood plan, the proposed subdivision designates blocks of land for the majority of the school block and a portion of the park block. 9.3 The application submitted proposes a healthy mix of residential units. The 250 units proposed are categorized as follows, 19% are to be on-street townhouses, 50% semi- detached/link units and 31% single family dwelling units. This breakdown of units should allow the developer to satisfy the goals of the Town's Municipal Housing Statement and those of the Ministry of Housing regarding the provision of affordable housing. 9.4 The subject lands, although within the Courtice urban ....10 ~9~~ , _ REPORT NO. PD-172-92 PAGE 1Q boundary, are located in the vicinity of lots serviced by private water and sanitary sewer systems. The developer, as a condition of approval, shall undertake a ground water monitoring program prior to development and provide compensation to any individual, whose private water supply, is negatively impacted by the development of these lands. In addition, prior to final approval of said plan and any on site grading the owner is required to submit a tree preservation plan. The plan shall detail all trees of significance and clearly identify which trees will be preserved. In addition, the report will address the reasons for removing those trees identified as being significant. 9.5 As mentioned previously the proponent has submitted an environmental noise impact statement in support of the application. Said report has been reviewed and approved by staff at the Region of Durham. Town staff have also reviewed the report and believe the findings and recommendations to be acceptable. The report has provided alternative noise mitigation measures for the outdoor living area of specific lots (lots 1, 125 and 136). Staff do not consider the first option of a 2.2 m high fence acceptable and recommend the second alternative be implemented which utilizes a more creative design for the corner dwellings to reduce the noise level in the outdoor living area. 10 CONCLUSION 10.1 In consideration of the comments received from the circulated agencies as well as the comments from Planning staff, it is recommended the proposed plan of subdivision be approved subject to the conditions contained in Attachment No. 1 attached hereto, and that the application for zoning ....11 REPORT NO. PD-172-92 PAGE 11, by-law amendment be approved and that the "Holding (H)" symbol be removed at such time the applicant has entered into an agreement for the development of the plan of subdivision. Respectfully submitted, Recommended for presentation to the Committee ' ~ 9 , , Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P. Lawrence E. Kots-f DIrector of Planning Chief Administr t' e and Development Officer CP*FW*CC Attachment # 1 - Conditions of Approval Attachment # 2 - Proposed Neighbourhood Development Attachment # 3 - Plan as submitted Attachment # 4 - Plan as Red Lined revised 8 July 1992 Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision: Kiddicorp Investments Ltd. D. G. Biddle & Associates Ltd. 1748 Baseline Road West 96 King Street East Courtice, Ontario LlE 2T1 Oshawa, Ontario L1H 1B6 Michael Freedman Dekkema - Gervais Bonnyden Limited Parkway Corporate Centre 7111 Dufferin Street 100 Allstate Parkway THORNHILL, Ont. L4J 2K2 Suite 501 MARKHAM, Ontario L3R 6H3 290572 Ontario Limited Attention: Wayne Jeffrey 58 Rossland Road West OSHAWA, Ontario L1G 2V5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION PLAN IDENTIFICATION 1. That this approval applies to draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-90010 prepared by D. G. Biddle and Associates Limited dated (revised) May 1992, (and further revised in red as per the attached plan) showing 78 lots for single family detached dwellings, 62 lots for semi-detached or linked dwellings (124 units), Blocks 141 to 146 inclusive for 48 on-street townhouse dwelling units, Block 165 for park purposes, Block 164 for school purposes, and various blocks for future development, 0.3 m reserve, road widening, site triangle etc. FINAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS 2. That all streets within the Plan of Subdivision shall be dedicated as public highway and shown as such on the final plan. 3. That all streets shall be named to the satisfaction of the Town of Newcastle and shown on the final plan. REDUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 4. That the Owner shall retain a qualified landscape architect to prepare and submit a Landscaping Plan to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and Development for review and approval. The Landscaping Plan shall reflect the design criteria of the Town as amended from time to time. 5. That the Owner shall retain a qualified Engineer to prepare and submit a Hydrogeologist Report to the Director of Planning and Development to demonstrate that the proposed development will not adversely impact the existing wells in the surrounding areas. 6. That the Owner shall retain a professional engineer to prepare and submit a Master Drainage and Lot Grading Plan to the Director of Public Works for review and approval. All plans and drawings must conform to the Town's Design Criteria as amended from time to time. 7. That the Owner shall retain a qualified consultant to prepare and submit a Tree Preservation plan to the Director of Planning and Development for review and approval. ...2 ! i -2- i CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION. REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 8. That the Owner shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Town and agree to abide by all terms and conditions of the Town's subdivision agreement, including, but not limited to, the requirements that follow. 9. That all easements, road widening, and reserves as required by the Town shall be granted to the Town free and clear of all encumbrances. 10. (a) That the entire neighbourhood park comprising Block 165 of Plan 18T90010 dated May 1992, Block 23 of Plan 18T90022 dated August 20, 1990 and Block 182 of Plan 18T87092 dated July 31, 1992 shall be dedicated to the Town prior to the execution of the Subdivision Agreement by the Town. (b) Prior to the owner requiring issuance of Building Permits for more than 50% of the dwellings permitted in this subdivision, the entire Neighbourhood Park must front on at least 30 metres of street frontage on a constructed and fully serviced public street. (c) That the owner transfer to the Town a temporary easement of access to the public park from Avondale Drive over a portion of the School Block shown on the Plan of Subdivision which is acceptable to the Director of Community Services. 11. That the Owner shall pay to the Town, development charge in accordance to the Development Charge By-law as amended from time to time. 12. That the Owner shall provide and install sidewalks, street lights, temporary turning circles etc. as per the Town's standards and criteria. 13. That the Owner shall cause all utilities, including, hydro, telephone, Cable TV, etc. to be buried underground. 14. That the Owner shall provide the Town, at the time of execution of the subdivision agreement, unconditional and irrevocable Letters of Credit acceptable to the Town's Treasurer, with respect to Performance Guarantee, Maintenance Guarantee, Occupancy Deposit and other guarantees or deposit as may be required by the Town. 15. That the Owner shall adhere to architectural control requirements of the Town. 16. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Owner shall, through its acoustic engineer, provide certification to the Director of Planning, certifying that the Builder's plans are in accordance with the Noise Control Report as approved by the Ministry of the Environment, Region of Durham and the Town of Newcastle. ...3 r ~ (a ;a ~ -3- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D~ 17. That prior to the issuance of building permits, access routes to the subdivision must be provided to meet Subsection 3.2.5.2(6) of the Ontario Building Code and; that all watermains and hydrants are fully serviced and the Owner agrees that during construction, fire access routes be maintained according to Subsection 2.5.1.2 of the Ontario Fire Code, storage of combustible waste be maintained as per Subsection 2.4.1.1 and open burning as per Subsection 2.6.3.4 of the Ontario Fire Code. 18. The Owner agrees that where the well or private water supply of any person is interfered with as a result of construction or the development of the subdivision, the Owner shall at his expense, either connect the affected party to municipal water supply system or provide a new well or private water system so that water supplied to the affected party shall be of quality and quantity at least equal to the quality and quantity of water enjoyed by the affected party prior to the interference. 19. That no building permit be available to blocks 158 inclusive to 162 until such time the un- named street becomes a through road, and a temporary turning circle shall be constructed at the terminus of the un-named street, directly abutting blocks 159 and 160. 20. That no building permit be available to blocks 154 and 155 until such time as Avondale Drive becomes a through road. 21. That lots 1 to 7 inclusive, lots 17, 18 and 19 and block 147 are frozen until such time Sandringham is constructed to intersect with Granary Lane and completed to a full urban cross-section. 22. That the storm drainage for this plan be in accordance with the Courtice Height South Master Drainage Plan and that the storm drainage works necessary for this plan be constructed in accordance with the "Draft" Robinson Creek Master Drainage Study, dated January 1991, prepared by G.M. Sernas & Associates Limited and as finally approved by the Director of Public Works. 23. That the applicant, pay the Town for the cost of oversizing the storm sewer and storm management works to service the drainage of this plan of subdivision, as defined in the Newcastle Co-Tenancy Cost Apportionment Report, dated October 1991, prepared by G.M. Sernas and Associates Limited and as finally approved by the Director of Public Works. ...4 ~ II -4- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION, REGIUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT ICONT'D~ 24. That the subdivision agreement contain a "staging plan" and all necessary provisions that will control the sequential development of this subdivision in conjunction with the construction of Trulls Road. Consideration shall be given to the number and nature of accesses to Trulls Road necessary to accommodate the traffic generated from this subdivision, and any external works or services necessary to service this development to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 25. That all the conditions of the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority be satisfied financially or otherwise. 26. That all the conditions of the Ministry of Natural Resources be satisfied financially or otherwise. 27, That all the conditions of the Ministry of the Environment be satisfied financially or otherwise. 28. That all the conditions of the Northumberland and Newcastle Public School Board be satisfied financially or otherwise. 2g. That a 0.3 m reserve de dedicated to the Town of Newcastle free and clear of all encumbrances along Lot 33 abutting "Avondale Drive": ~~(~1 i,, I % .ATTACHMENT •#2~ H~ G/.~ wAY N0 2 ! ! ' ~ ,l ~ I J = ( O'Z' J \ ~ I i I - _ \ I I ~ I w oe I I ~ I I \iH Z _I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q I ~ ~ ~ - . 0 ~ I I ~~T1 lTl ~1T~~ T-~-~Y d m y , ~ ~ I ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ 3AIt1 V UONVS ~ w m d ` 5 1 Z~ 11 1 I f/ ~- ~V: JQ I I I I I I yt i t•: r '.:7i•::.':•::•::::v::•I:::•''•:•::•::•:':'.'•:•:•: a- •.~v t i b 1 S :4~I {5i17 :~Yi Y}7='N: ;Ifi:; •{{.h}. i • ...4. ~ ' ~'~::x•: ~:::;::•::ir::~ ::~:~55:;:; ' I I ;I: I • ~ T(T, . I „ Ito .I _ a N~ :~?t~ . ~ I (I III I U s ~ . ':€::~s:Y is 3 i ...A :5~~ < ¢1::• I I i r` .a [ ~ i II 5 i; i i, $ j i::;• `:>i•' ~~i •'•55:•::'~~ •:::':';i• `;:;iii ~i:'~ri: i:':i:r ~ ~~~x' ~~.;~.•3iCai~~•~''-•.~i~ :+i~~:•::i:';'i~:`•i:Yi~isi:;:•::::'~?:::':%':'.;~~ \ U _ m : fi 7, : i i ;i~xii: i;:Xt ir8i: ~ R~t:'•%`% ;:Yc> • :'::,g..• _ 5 A~: = i ::{ivS::i'.{ ^:v}:!'•}:•}Y? ~ $i:<:::,'~ ~'::.''7ia "'h: ••'j:y::'~•::::n.,''i•: • p! ({I _ .~};:'i:fCC :`Xi['~$:.:][[ff:r:Yf[c'c'f>:.~Y;::':.;•iPr,:}};~:i :i.'•:~' Q{i iY:' a>'• "{n:.'.::'•?i~• I - J , :fib. Sri:;;.' ..r,:: <:i:%: ::•r e. • ::9 •::•F~.. I I -111= o ~ ~ I ~ ~l Li_11_I~1~) LL I I = 11 ~~~~1 f.. ATTACHMENT ~3 PLAN AS SUBMIITTED ~ _ _ W ~ ~ ~ _ vO/s ! ~•i ~ ~ J „ - °oovo_o~~~~ i j "_i~'2~ : I v5 ~ i - y°mr_p7as r' G ~Z Z I/) `-3 e ^ _ $ 3 y ?l:iy~ 1~1 ~ C a LL 1- ii S!l CID ~ J v ~ o x „ a _ rcJ iS w i`il?~a~{~ ' ~ ;3 a o . 1- _ _ 6 LL "y`~ ~ LL w ~ y :i ~ 3 : ~ N a p. ">- ~ 3 ~ a = ~ 3 . o ~ a Y 3 a Y s \1 f ~a ~ ~ ~~3 Z y a5p~xg~"„•c`°~q~ ~ g~ o~ ~v~~; " ~''o~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ g I y F-• ~5~=^'.$~°~~~033'~:~ ~3 ~ ~ap~~~~~ a'"~ i ~ $ j~ay~ u. ~ 1 `\\~1 ~ I ~ ~ o~` , 3~ /?/O ~ IYYH9Nl?IONYS 777 L~ -- - e n -rlL ,b^ ~J •a'm~~l n _ ~1 J ~ a„ eN ~ ~y yy ~5 I I INI ~ '3J a, w.iwi~wri w~i~jee f~f °•a I^$"~,.• ^ °b'i\, r '•~m~ ~o h ;yal 1 a _ \ _ l i ~ ~ p i (i! s o s _ „ a „ ~ a - a --~E.~ • of s•srJ $ ~ x 1 a., ~ 1N30S3N0 ~ ~ ~ ~ . - 1 - ~ Z :il;;~~ ti . _ r~ R III I i ~ °q ~ ~ ` ~ ' 3 s I .oaa a a t' r`r/ g -L!~._._.. J 3 ~ d Su3 u3A o,•o: ..t J•• R~ - 3 i ' J 3e$ e~ I ~Y m~ JJii -~ S r~Br' ~I a ~a °a a o A _ I I ~ I f V I 1`\ ~ z m m' d'j a g. t by A _ _ p e' a \ 1 i i x$47 -Y _ y¢/€ Q PI $„A '•-€ S°.•. il•?. ~~Al iaa nA _ •,~-, ~'1• t" 6 $ ' _ t J -.- ~I S II( S YI pit x•' `'g} ° s,;, I 1 ~ \ ~ 1 M ~ ,y /y -~?--• = ~ spa ~ a jF+•~; ~ .Ian:}~r•~s•, ~,-~ „ - ~ ,atj~ g „ ~ 1 I J a a .i e.. ° ~ I ~ ~ m e.. nl~ ; ' °I y ,v - ~ - ~v ~ V. -lye I, 11V I rv `j:D W ~,a.° ~ e ,~F 1 y 9 3~ l?/O 377! c I....~.ls~ - -~,:~~,.+ ~ ~l o `Ij s R eS' - r 1° _ ^ r.asrto:c)w--. as.sr.un a .c..n S-° °'.n 4 r 1 I. i 1 ~ I ~ I I S as•S SA ~°- ISp~fe _ I:S:\l~.y r~Il 1,~a~.. M)I~~'c 1 .\b'I 11 a~A ' \ C/.'ll I •Ot.%JI n • + 01 I'.0?.% Il M j 01)'6 1 I / •'4 ~h~ _ 1~-I 1 ` y ~ ° ~ 3r NV"Id 1~`021Q.^•.~0 11Yi1'1 I.orj%JI~~ I W ~ i{A I:i ~ rwu I~1 - _~_T-_ J -F r inm yy lF 107 ~ ~ ~ I OFI Q T~ I _ ~ 107 R i, ~ ~ ITT- I I I ~ i. ' - ~.-, isc )II i .00.lC JI n 1 ~ l~ t({'(II I .Oi.tl Jl M ~ ' j ATTACHMENI° #4 PLAN AS RED-LINED REVISED ' A`~ W ~3 N - ~~-'oooo ~.~I ~ o i _ i~if;is~ ~ V a ~ : .~Y 1 7a: r -Cyr = t•-• ~ a< ~ y';9Y•J~ ; •y w J . ~i 3"~ ~ J V ~ u w N w~ _V' w a,w9;ay ~-5- tzi ~ _ -y7 zJ Z ~ zo. e z t'ex:_3~ j ~ o: tin - o W _ °_w ~ a as o a ~ o o~ ~ _ ~ ^ ~ ~ z }.N SAS- X12 ~h ~n~~ a ~ I ~ S - c~ ~ IS. b. ~.b I,O ~Jd J $ ~ O ~ ~ ~ z~ x ~t~~s qq V ~q c s~ t ~ `-'' ~ ~ `°y m II n r~ Z ~ RS+~ ~a~-~yy 7- JQ i Ibi LL St KJ L ~ Y 0.•`~ [ d i O ~o°u Z ~ w a~~~~0$nC 3i~$'~~.d yrd' af= S~~''i w _:juF 41~ I- mF . ~ ~r 3 u ~3aS-. ~i~~"y~-'2{ify t.y iY yY• s w :a=oo~ ~ ~ V~ fI1 `~l Cj Y• ~ q Mai 3 •"-'.Y '~god2~~ ~r o ~J•~E~]" lc~it lam- _ ~ ° ~ l_. Y F-~ ~S~~~N.~Y"Y~~:o$3a~~ ~j S ~:~~Y~~ "a~ i ~ 9 ifi:s °u, J. x- ~ - ` IN - Y: t\\ _fi ' \ ~3 1 " l ] .ot.sz.la x I \ . fw'flt . 3~12/OYIYYN9Nl?lONYS .- >~«.:a.I~N~y\ I a Nsi w.~ w.. w.`' _ -_^-- ~y~ ' - 1 = c~ " ~ yh '3~ ~ 1 l ~NI \ ~ IootTe~f a`- .r I`d~ S _ 3 `°-~ ~'q ;y I,IwI.• ,.I Ny R ;INai y ft I ~ .fr I I i hlpi ~ r s wa _ Ns s t+ a y l i l i ~ ii----~~///~ / b I SHW] w^ r( J S 9p~ 1N39S3?/0 ~ _ 1 fUt t, a.t .ka ~ sr x A ° ~ ~ Gil;i;Z 1 I I i ` ~ "od w P + ~ N . w R t_x~ ;-V. ~A- • r p ~ -~ ~F rw d g a ,Y ~ ~r J ~ : °r x ~ _.__I... I _3 t, 4~f~ 1 $ ~ s 8 x ,i g I I , ^- J 7 ti ~L{ d x o ~ . o : i < r•o ,.^a2 R ~ y ~B~S 1S ~ oo t~ . ~ .'.t N ~t I a - a w a ^ ~///1 '8 • ~ i ` I I I i t_ \ \ i' O ~ = y ~ o i. e. ti -~`. K 8 y,. I '~I S ~ j 'r i c. bf3: N,R Nf~ ~..S~'' ~4+• - ~ III I I V E 1 LN Z I t / I ~ ~ 3 mgt art ' Y X s x _ ry dJ R a' 4',' t \ ~ e I ~I ~ n ~ a P~ ~~'i.'1~yy ~ -. .- 1 - 903 or p ~A A i 4xw ~ J~ d t`` II j '-- _.J 11 w' o..r Na ~ _ ~ti .fn if.o `f e-' ~ g~ '~f,~ A~ `C _ . . _ a~~ y;X -~~ -- ~1 Sws ~ R sf_ ,f•t: Mts =s _s _ a _Y ~~e r ~~\yi V - 'I N1 3 N ! IJ . ur N o N f~ N . ° ' ; ~•t rt y, °~- ~ 1 1 - -] ~ I f.. a b 3/1 / NO 377/ I X --.... _ z. r xa' + ar fys f f f a a x ~ ~ a ~ IS `yy. a.<r'r .-r .oz.of.fz• ..ro.t..cf~ 'av ~ 11,'„14 I. ~I I ~ I ~ ~ I y may. _ - otX\~ t . a.~8~. 7 It' ~ w I . I j ,Y, ~ M ~ O~ , y t/i'if ] .Oi.%•12 N • 002 O2 3•.02.% I! M Olf'tt ~7 O? 91 1 I ! \ 3.021%•14'1 I I / W ! 32,1'.1 1 I ( ~ I[ ~ Isr Ndld l~`di1Q. ~0 l I Yi i ~ ~ao_ t~ _ ~..aa `l u i~ { I . J Y I i -~ r-_ V ~ ~ `-'r P,C - lF 107 ~ o ii ~ ~ ~ OFI T_r I I - i ~J . _ SZ 107 ~ _ ~ , T' f .~.f~.%. , ~ ~ yy _ -~ ,- _ _ - rr itt ftl ) •00.2[•12 x 1 ~It!`'t2Z 1 .Ot.t]J2 h ~~U I THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEWCASTLE BY-LAW NUMBER 92- being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle. WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle deems it advisable to amend By- law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle in accordance with DEV 90-014 to permit the development of 250 residential units. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Newcastle enacts as follows: 1. Schedule "4" to By-law 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone category as follows: from "Holding Urban Residential Type One ((H)Ri)" to "Holding Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)"; and from "Holding Urban Residential Type One ((H)Ri)" to "Holding -Urban Residential Type Three ((H)R3)". as indicated on the attached Schedule "A" hereto. 2. Schedule "A" attached hereto shall form part of this By-law. 3. This By-law shall come into effect on the date of the passing hereof, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act. BY-LAW read a first time this day of 1992. BY-LAW read a second time this day of 1992. BY LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 1992. MAYOR CLERK This is Schedule "A" to By-law 92 - , passed this ~ day, of ,1.992 A.D. LOT 30 0~~~ _- ;s CONCESSION y,~- a i o f a I I. RYN?4/UONYVY~ ( -..- r..... _ ~s ~l.a,,. i3 \ ~ ! 7 _ ~ . ~ , ~I6I; a'~I,I; .ii?i3;.k~,:°~:?i ~x%i%°4;~E~~ 1, ~ i ~'s•': ::~i i;';. ~'"`i~.:afi''.`+i':i'iii£:i:i:Si~:i?.f:tf?i:i'fc 3 ~ ' ZONING CHANGE FROM a~ y a ~ ~ ~:T~~::::;.. <»»>~::.:::;>:.:.:~F;:< I~ ~ '(H)RI' TO ~(H~R2 ~ ZONING CHANGE FROM x ~>~.r~::;: S y ' '.,y:: 0 IIIi=113 'I' ( ~ - - J, :i: tl ..~:?..i:Y,i ~;-- ~ .;t ~ `r 20NING TO REMAIN(H)RI X . -i ~ .1 T~. Tn «~~::'j:0. I.,~~~. r ~.n :4M C~:. Z.,i' 2 i. ' ~ yid Y.v~ ":j`,.,." 1 e 1 . 4/NO 1377/ 1 .,i:; .+t:+F;y Y~. J~ LOT ? ~ i ! i i LOT Mayor r ~ ~ Clerk ®SUBJECT SITE ®OTHER LANDS OWNED BY APPLICANT LOT 31 LOT 30 LOT 29 ' NASH ROAD V I EP R1 RI R4 I RI RI_ -. -- 1 I EP ~/G Rl\ ~ (H)R4 ~ ~ _ o HwAY Ng P~ ;- (H)R1 z I= I N - ~ EP RI EP o O Ras . ~ (H)R1 W ~ EP Rz F ~ W Rai ~ U . J;//~ ~ U R2-2 R1 ti ,