HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/01/2000 I
I
i
i
VIII
it
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
GENERAL PURPOSE AND
ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING
MAY 1,2000 -9;30 A.M.
FILE
i
i
i
i
i
I
i
i
I
MUNICIPALITY OF
�ar,i t®n
ONTARIO
GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
DATE: MAY 1, 2000
I
TIME: 9:30 A.M.
PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. ROLL CALL
2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
3. MINUTES
(a) Minutes of a Regular Meeting of April 17, 2000 301
(b) Minutes of a Special Meeting of April 17, 2000 309
i
4. PRESENTATION
i
(a) Mr. Charles Packer, Site Vice President, Ontario Power Generation
Darlington, Box 4000, Bowmanville, L1C 3Z8 - re: Update on
Darlington Nuclear Station
(b) Ms. Vaneyk, 6613 Clemens Road, Bowmanville, L1C 3K6, Margaret
Walton, Walton & Hunter Planning Associates and Representatives of
the Durham Region Federation of Agriculture, 4441 Malcolm Road,
R.R. #1, Nestleton, LOB ILO - re: Greater Toronto Area
Agricultural Economic Impact Study - Report PD-032-00
5. DELEGATIONS
(a) Ms. Valerie Dostie, 707 Waverly Road, Bowmanville, L1C 3K3 -
re: PD-045-00
6. PUBLIC MEETINGS
(a) Rezoning Application 1.
Part Lot 26, Concession 1, Former Village of Newcastle
REPORT PD-039-00 - 1319164 Ontario Inc. 501
(b) Rezoning Application
Part Lot 32, Concession 2, Former Township of Darlington
REPORT PD-040-00 - WILLIAM BRYANS 5
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET BOWMANVILLE • ONTARIO • LiC 3A6 • (905) 623-3379 • FAX 623-4169
RECYCLED PAPER
WEBSITE: www municipality clanngton.on.ca i
G.P.& A. Agenda - 2 - May 1, 2000
(c) Rezoning Application
Part Lot 8, Concession 2, Former Town of Bowmanville
REPORT PD-041-00 - LANDCREST DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT
INC. ON BEHALF OF ST. STEPHENS ESTATES INC. 505
7. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
- - (a) PD-039-00 - Rezoning Application
Applicant: 1319164 Ontario Limited
Part Lot 26, Concession 1, Former Village
of Newcastle 601
(b) PD-040-00 - Rezoning Application
Applicant: William Bryans
Part Lot 32, Concession 2, Former Township of
Darlington - 1560 Highway 2, Courtice 608
(c) PD-041-00 - Rezoning Application
- Applicant: Landcrest Development Management Inc.
on behalf of St. Stephens Estates Inc.
Part Lot 8, Concession 2, Former Town of Bowmanville 616
(d) PD-042-00 Rezoning and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications
Applicant: Lizjan Developments Inc.
(to be distributed under separate cover)
(e) PD-043-00 - Deferral No. 38 to the Clarington Official Plan as
requested by Bruce Brown 623
(f) PD-044-00 - Monitoring of Decisions of the Committee of
Adjustment for the meeting of April 20, 2000 630
(g) PD-045-00 - Municipality of Clarington - Proposed Street Name
Change for a portion of Waverly Road and Watson
Drive 638
(h) PD-046-00 - Greater Toronto Services Board (GTSB) Removing
Road Blocks - i\ Strategic Transportation Plan for the
GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth 644
8. CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
(a) CD-18-00 - Animal Services Monthly Report for the Month of
March, 2000 701
G.P.& A. Agenda - 3 - May 1, 2000
(b) CD-19-00 - Parking Enforcement Report for the Month of
March, 2000 703
9. TREASURY DEPARTMENT
No Reports
10. FIRE DEPARTMENT - - -
No Reports
11. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
No Reports
12. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
No Reports
13. ADMINISTRATION
(a) ADMIN-11-00 - Confidential Personnel Matter
(to be distributed under separate cover)
b - - -
O ADMIN 13 00 Confidential Personnel Matter
(to be distributed under separate cover)
14. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -
(a) PD-032-00 - Greater Toronto Area - Agricultural Economic
Impact Study (tabled at meeting of April 3, 2000) 1301
i
15. OTHER BUSINESS
16. ADJOURNMENT
THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
General Purpose and Administration Committee April 17,2000
Minutes of a meeting of the General Purpose and
Administration Committee held on Mondav,
April 17, 2000 at 9:30 a.m., in the Council
Chambers.
ROLL CALL
_ - Present Were: Mayor D. Hamre
Councillor J. Mutton
_ Councillor M. Novak
Councillor J. Rowe
Councillor J. Schell
Councillor C. Trim
Councillor T. Young
Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu
Director of Community Services,J. Caruana
Fire Chief, M.Creighton
Director of Planning and Development, D. Crome
Treasurer, M. Marano
Director of Public Works, S. Vokes
Deputy Clerk, M. Knight Stanley
Mayor Hamre chaired this portion of the meeting.
DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There were no disclosures of pecuniary interest stated at this meeting.
MINUTES
Resolution >7GPA-166-00
Moved by Councillor Young,seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT the minutes of a regular meeting of the General Purpose and Administration
Committee held on April 3,2000 be approved.
"CARRIED"
I
DELEGATION
(a) Representative of the Port Darlington Community Association
119 Cove Road, Bowmanville, LIC 3K3 —delegation was withdrawn as was Report
PD-036-00 which was the subject of their presentation.
G.P. & A. Minutes - ? - April 17,2000
Councillor Novak chaired this portion of the meeting.
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Rezoning and Resolution #G PA-167-00
Draft Plan of
Subdivision Appl. Moved by Councillor Young, seconded by Councillor Trim
Lizjan Developments
ZBA 99-029& THAT Report PD-035-00 be received for information; and
18T-99018
THAT all interested parties listed in Report PD-035-00 and any delegation be
advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
Rezoning Appl. Report PD-036-00 was withdrawn from the agenda at the request of the Director of
Mun. of Clar. Planning and Development.
Westside Marsh
And Associated
Lands
_ DES/ 97-083
DEV 97-084- -
Monitoring Resolution #GPA-168-00 _
Of the Decisions
Of the Committee Moved by Councillor Mutton,seconded by Mayor Hamre
Of Adjustment
March 30,2000 THAT Report PD-037-00 be received; j
i
THAT Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on
March 30,2000 for Applications A99/024 and A2000/008 to A2000/010, inclusive;
and
THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend
the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment for Applications A99-024 and
A2000/008 to A2000/010, inclusive, in the event of an appeal.
"CARRIED"
I
Amendment to Resolution #G PA-169-00
Draft Plan Approval
And Rezoning Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Mutton
Appl, 1138337
Ontario Inc. THAT Report PD-038-00 be received,
ZBA 99-019
THAT the draft approved Plan of Subdivision 18T-91004,as revised and dated
February 16,2000,as per Attachment#3 to Report PD-038-00, be approved subject
to the conditions of Draft Approval as set out in Attachment#l to Report
PD-038-00;
THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized,by By-law, to execute the amending
Subdivision Agreement between the Owner of the revised Draft Plan of Subdivision
18T-91004;
THAT Application ZBA 99-019 submitted by 1138337 Ontario Inc. to amend
Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 of the former Town of Newcastle,as
amended, be approved and that the amending by-law be forwarded to Council for
approval; and
302
i
G.P. & A. Minutes - 3 - April 17,2000
i
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONT'D.
i
THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department, all interested parties listed in
Report PD-038-00 and any delegations be advised of Council's decision.
"CARRIED"
The Director of Planning and Development gave a verbal update on the status of the
Zoning By-law for the Municipality of Clarington . It is anticipated that the first
draft of the new document will be released in June of this year.
CLERK'S DEPARTMENT
There were no reports considered under this section of the agenda.- --
Councillor Mutton chaired this portion of the meeting. -
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Co-operative Resolution#GPA-170-00
j Tender WR1-2000
Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Trim
THAT Report TR-15-00 be received;
THAT Miller Paving Limited, Markham,Ontario,with a total bid price of
$29,700.00(plus applicable taxes), for the Municipality of Clarington's
requirements for liquid calcium chloride(Section 1)being the lowest responsible
bidder meeting all terms,conditions and specifications of the Co-operative Tender
WR1-2000, be awarded the contract to supply and apply approximately 200,000
litres of liquid calcium chloride,as required by the Municipality of Clarington
Public Works Department;
THAT Innovative—Building-Products, Ajax,Ontario,with a total-bid price of-__---
$2,170.00(plus applicable taxes), for the Municipality of Clarington's requirements
for flaked calcium chloride(in 40 kilo bags),(Section 1 1)being the lowest
responsible bidder meeting all terms, conditions and specifications of the Co-
operative Tender WR1-2000,, be awarded the portion of the contract to supply and
deliver approximately 5,600 kg of flaked calcium chloride,as required by the
Municipality of Clarington Public Works Deparatment;
THAT, pending satisfactory pricing and service and approval by the Durham
Purchasing Co-operative, the contracts be awarded for a second year; and
THAT the funds expended be drawn from the approved budget allocation for Public
Works Road Maintenance, FORTHWITH.
"CARRIED"
i
III
303
G.P.& A. Minutes -4- April 17,2000
TREASURY DEPARTMENT CONT'D.
Purchase of Jaws Resolution i4G PA-171-00
Of Life
Moved by Councillor Schell, seconded by Councillor Rowe
THAT Report TR-16-00 be received;
it
THAT the procedures set out in Purchasing By-law No. 94-129, section 5,
Paragraph 06, be waived for this particular transaction;
THAT Council authorize Staff to issue a purchase order for the supply and delivery
of the Hurst Jaws of Life to Code 4 Fire and Rescue, Mississauga, Ontario at a total
cost of$24,991.99(Including taxes);and
i
THAT the funds be drawn from the 2000 Fire Department approved Capital Budget
Account 7102-00001-0504.
"CARRIED"
Resolution a#GPA-172-00
I
Moved by Councillor Young, seconded by Councillor Schell
THAT the committee recess for 15 minutes.
"CARRIED"
The meeting reconvened at 10:20 a.m.
i
Councillor Schell chaired this portion of the meeting.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Monthly Fire Resolution #GPA-173-00
Report
March, 2000 Moved by Councillor Trim,seconded by Councillor Rowe
THAT Report FD-07-00 be received for information.
"CARRIED"
Councillor Young chaired this portion of the meeting. i
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
There were no reports considered under this section of the agenda.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Schickedanz Sub. Resolution#GPA-174-00
Phase I
`Certificate of Moved by Councillor Novak,seconded by Councillor Rowe
Acceptance'
Plan IOM-829 THAT Report WD-17-00 be received;
THAT the Director of Public Works be authorized to issue a `Certificate of
Acceptance' for the Roads and Above Ground Services,which include final stage
roads and other related Works,constructed within Plan l OM-829;and
304
G.P. & A. Minutes 5 - April 17.2000
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONT'D.
THAT Council approve the by-law attached to Report WD-17-00, assuming the
streets within Plan IOM-829 as Public Hiohways.
"CARRIED"
Courtice Crossing Resolution#GPA-175-00
Subdivision,
Phase 4 Moved by Councillor Schell,seconded by Councillor Mutton
Plan 40M-1839 �
THAT Report WD-18-00 be received;
THAT the Director of Public Works be authorized to issue a 'Certificate of
- Acceptance' for the Final Works, which include final stage roads and other related
Works, constructed within Plan 40M-1839; and
THAT Council approve the by-law attached to Report WD-18-00, assuming the
streets within Plan 40M-1839 as Public Highways.
"CARRIED"
Monthly Report Resolution #G PA-176-00
On Building Permit
Activity Moved by Councillor Trim, seconded by Councillor Schell
March, 2000
THAT Report WD-19-00 be received for information.
"CARRIED"
Mayor Hamre chaired this portion of the meeting.
ADMINISTRATION -
Corporate Resolution #GPA-177-00
Advertising
Program & Moved by Councillor Young,seconded by Councillor Trim
Procedures
THAT Report ADMIN-09-00 be received;
THAT Council approve and endorse the implementation of the Corporate
Advertising Program as contained in Report ADMIN-08-00; and
THAT the Corporate Advertising Program run in the Canadian Statesman and the
Orono Weekly Times,on a two per month basis effective May 1, 2000.
i
"CARRIED"
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
I
There was no unfinished business under this section of the agenda. �
I
i
I
305
G.P. & A. Minutes -6- April 17,2000
OTHER BUSINESS
Bethesda Resolution i�GPA-178-00
House
Moved by Councillor Schell,seconded by Councillor Rowe
WHEREAS the Bethesda House Shelter for abused women and children is in a
financial crisis and without funding of$28,000 will be forced to close its doors;
AND WHEREAS the Province has refused to fund any additional Women's
Shelters in Ontario;
AND WHEREAS there is a proven need for this agency in the Municipality of
Clarington; _
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Municipality of Clarington provide a
one-time grant of$5,000 to assist with the immediate needs of the shelter,with the
funds coming from the unallocated grants account, FORTHWITH; and
THAT Bethesda House be advised of actions taken.
- I
"CARRIED"
Bethesda Resolution #G PA-179-00
House
Moved by Councillor Schell,seconded by Councillor Young
WHEREAS the Bethesda House,Clarington's only shelter for abused women and
children, faces a financial crisis which could force it to close by the end of April
2000; and
WHEREAS Bethesda House opened in March 1995, following the Provincial
Government's funding cap for victims of violence, and
WHEREAS plans for the shelter were underway at the time the funding cap was
announced; and
WHEREAS the Province of Ontario continues to fund shelters which were already
in existence prior to the freeze,and
WHEREAS a need for the shelter has been demonstrated in that it has provided
temporary crisis shelter for more than 900 women and children since its opening;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the Municipality of
Clarington appeal to the Honourable Michael D. Harris, Premier of Ontario, that the
services which Bethesda House provides to the residents of Clarington and Durham
Region be recognized and that Provincial funding be established to allow for the
operational costs of Bethesda House to be able to continue to operate and serve the
community; and
FURTHER that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Minister of
Community and Social Services,all MPP's in the Regional Municipality of
Durham, Leaders of the Opposition and Bethesda House.
"CARRIED"
306
G.P. &A. Minutes - 7 - April 17,2000
i
OTHER BUSINESS CONT'D.
Resolution #GPA-180-00
Moved by Councillor Rowe,seconded by Councillor Mutton
THAT the rules of procedure be suspended to allow for reconsideration of
Resolution#C-168-00.
"CARRIED"
Resolution#GPA-181-00 - —
Moved by Councillor Novak,seconded by Councillor Trim
THAT Resolution#C-168-00 be reconsidered for the purpose of making an
amendment thereto.
j - -
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-182-00
Moved by Councillor Schell,seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT Resolution#C-168-00 be amended by deleting item(b)of the second
paragraph in its entirety and replacing it with the following wording:
g
(b) THAT the recommendation of a 50:50 split of revenues for 1998, a 50:50 split
of revenues for 1999 and a 60:40 thereafter plit of revenues between the area
municipalities and the Region be approved conditional upon the municipalities
and the Region of Durham agreeing and conditional on no further discussions
taking place, FORTHWITH.
"CARRIED"
The Resolution in its entirety now reads as follows:
THAT Report CD-16-00 be received;
THAT the following recommendations of the Durham POA Task Forces Report be
approved:
(a) That the Regional Municipality of Durham be selected as the preferred POA
service provider;
(b) That the recommendation of a 50:50 split of revenues for 1998, a 50:50 split
of revenues for 1999 and a 60:40 thereafter split of revenues between the area
municipalities and the Region be approved conditional upon the
municipalities and the Region of Durham agreeing and conditional on no
further discussions taking place, FORTHWITH;
THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the Intermunicipal
Agreement, and the Local Service Agreement;
THAT the authorizing By-law be passed at the appropriate time;and
THAT Regional Council be advised of Council's actions.
307
G.P. & A. Minutes 8 - April 17,2000
ADJOURNMENT
Resolution #GPA-183-00
Moved by Councillor Young,seconded by Councillor Schell
THAT the meeting adjourn at 10:50 a.m.
"CARRIED"
MAYOR
DEPUTY CLERK
I
308
i
THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
General Purpose and Administration Committee April 17, 2000
Minutes of a special meeting of the General
Purpose and Administration Committee held on
Monday,April 17,2000 at 1 1:15 a.m., in the
Council Chambers,
ROLL CALL
Present Were: Mayor D. Hamre
- Councillor J. Mutton
Councillor M.Novak
- - Councillor J. Rowe
Councillor J. Schell
Councillor C.Trim
Councillor T. Young
Also Present: Chief Administrative Officer, F. Wu
Director of Community Services, J. Caruana
Fire Chief, M. Creighton
Director of Planning and Development, D. Crome
Treasurer, M. Marano
Chief Librarian,C. Mearns
Director of Public Works, S. Vokes
Deputy Clerk, M. Knight Stanley
Councillor Mutton chaired the meeting.
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There were no Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest stated for this meeting.
2000 Current Resolution #GPA-184-00
Budget
Moved by Councillor Rowe, seconded by Councillor Schell
THAT Report TR-14-00 be received for information;
THAT the 2000 Current Budget which includes the Executive Summary and
external budgets, be approved, with the non-controllable and Priority#I items
identified on Attachment#I to Report TR-14-00, with an overall impact of 0%:
THAT Council give consideration to those items identified as Priority 42 (Library),
on Attachment#1 to Report TR-14-00:
i
THAT the appropriate By-laws to levy the 2000 tax rates for Municipal, Region
and Education purposes be recommended to Council for approval:
THAT Council authorize the following recommendations for the Clarington Older
Adults Association and the Beech Centre;
a) The funding for the approved Capital Project—Elevator at the Beech Centre
from the principal portion of the Older Adults Capital Reserve Fund;
309
G.P. & A. Minutes -2 - April 17,2000
TREASURY DEPARTMENT CONT'D.
b) The$40.000 for Clarington Beech Centre included prior to finalization of the
Capital Budget requests, on page 28 of the Capital Budget, be redirected to the
Municipal operating budget,to assist in the zero percent impact;
c) The Older Adults additional capital and operating requests per Attachment#2 to
Report TR-14-00 in the amount of$47,000 be approved(reduced by any
Trillium Funding or other Provincial grants received applicable to these
requests) from the interest portion of the Older Adults Capital Reserve Fund;
_ I
THAT any funds remaining in the Ontario Senior Games Reserve be available for
use on promotional banners,etc. for the upcoming games;
- THAT Clarington Library Board,Clarington Older Adults—Beech Centre, Visual _
Arts Centre and Museums be advised of Council's actions; and _
THAT the Garbage Reserve be consolidated with the Rate Stabilization/Working
Funds Reserve.
"SEE FOLLOWING MOTIONS"
Councillor Mutton and Marie Marano,Treasurer,gave a verbal report with respect
to the year 2000 Current Budget.
Resolution#GPA-185-00
Moved by Mayor Hamre, seconded by Councillor Trim
THAT the 2000 Current Budget submitted for the Mayor and Members of Council
and the Chief Administrative Officer's Department be approved.
_ I �
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-186-00
i
Moved by Councillor Trim,seconded by Councillor Young
THAT the 2000 Current Budget submitted for the Clerk's Department-be approved.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-187-00
Moved by Councillor Novak,seconded by Councillor Schell
THAT the 2000 Current Budget submitted for the Finance Department and
Unclassified Administration be approved.
"CARRIED"
Resolution#GPA-188-00
Moved by Councillor Schell,seconded by Councillor Rowe
THAT the 2000 Current Budget submitted for the Fire Department be approved.
"CARRIED"
310
i
I
G.P. & A. Minutes April 17,2000
TREASURY DEPARTMENT CONT'D.
I
Resolution 4GPA-189-00
Moved by Councillor Young,seconded by Mayor Hamre
THAT the 2000 Current Budget submitted for the Public Works Department be
approved.
"CARRIED"
Resolution#GPA-190-00
Moved by Councillor Rowe,seconded by Councillor Schell
THAT the 2000 Current Budget submitted for the Community Services Department
be approved.
"CARRIED"
Resolution#GPA-191-00
Moved by Councillor Novak,seconded by Councillor Schell
THAT the 2000 Current Budget submitted for the Planning and Development
Department be approved.
"CARRIED"
Resolution#GPA-192 -00
Moved by Councillor Novak,seconded by Mayor Hamre
THAT the requests received from the Bowmanville and Clarke Museums be
combined and divided between the two museums equally.
"SEE FOLLOWING MOTION"
Resolution#GPA-193-00
Moved by Councillor Rowe, seconded by Councillor Young
THAT the budget of the Bowmanville Museum and the Clarke Museum be divided
to allow for consideration of each budget separately.
"MOTION LOST"
The foregoing Resolution#GPA-192-00 was then put to a vote and CARRIED.
Resolution #GPA-194-00
Moved by Councillor Rowe,seconded by Councillor Schell
THAT the 2000 Current Budget for the Visual Arts Centre be approved.
"CARRIED"
I
I
i
311
G.P. & A. Minutes -4- April 17,2000
Resolution#GPA-195-00
Moved by Councillor Rowe, seconded by Councillor Novak
THAT the 2000 Current Budget for the Clarington Public Library be approved.
"CARRIED"
Resolution #GPA-184-00 was then put to a vote and CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT
Resolution#GPA-196-00
Moved by Councillor Young,seconded by Councillor Schell
THAT the meeting adjourn at 11:55 a.m.
"CARRIED"
MAYOR
I
I
DEPUTY CLERK
I i
312
REPORT: PD-039-00
1319164 Ontario Ltd.
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will hold a
public meeting to consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment under Section 34 of the
Planning Act, 1990, as amended.
DATE: MONDAY, MAY 1, 2000
TIME: 9:30 A.M.
PLACE: Council Chambers, Municipal Administrative Centre,
40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario
The proposed zoning by-law amendment, submitted by 1319164 Ontario Limited, would change
the zone category of a 1704 m2 parcel of land located in Part Lot 26, Concession 1, former Village
of Newcastle (as shown on the reverse) from "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ((H)R1)" to
an appropriate zone permitting the development of six (6) single detached dwelling units.
ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either
in support of or in opposition to the proposal. Please note that the time listed above reflects the
time at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences, not
necessarily when this item will be considered.
IF A PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY that files an appeal of a decision of Clarington Council in
respect of the proposed zoning by-law does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make
written submissions to the Municipality of Clarington before the proposed Zoning By-law is
adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:30
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. (8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. for the months of July and August) at the Planning
Department, 40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario or by calling Susan Ashton at 623-3379.
DATED AT THE MUNICIPALITY
OF CLARINGTON
THIS 20 DAY OFMARCH 2000
Marie g t- 1X'eputy Clerk ,
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario LIC 3A6
PLANNING FILE: ZBA 2000-006
CLERK'S FILE: D14.ZBA 2000-006
5 � 1
SUBJECT SITE
LOT 27 LOT 26
cAIVAt),
4/v
PAC/F/C N
ELt qy Z
a cn
Ld
z
- 0
G SiTRDET 'i EAS U
a
�I z
T _ � 0_
Lu
(n
W
HIGHWAY 401
S
NEWCASTLE VILLAGE ZBA 2000-006
KEY MAP
502
REPORT: PD-40-00
William Bryans
dn: publorg
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will hold a
public meeting to consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment under Section 34 of the
Planning Act, 1990, as amended.
DATE: MONDAY, MAY 1, 2000
TU*4E: 9:30 A.M.
PLACE: Council Chambers,Municipal Administrative Centre,
40 Temperance St.,Bowmanville,Ontario
The proposed zoning by-law amendment, submitted by William Bryans, would change the zone
category on a 0.20 hectare parcel of land located in Part Lot 32, Concession 2, former Township of
Darlington (as shown on the reverse) from "Urban Residential Type One (RI) Zone" to an
appropriate zone to permit a professional office use.
ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either
in support of or in opposition to the proposal. Please note that the time listed above reflects the time
at which the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences, not necessarily
when this item will be considered.
IF A PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY that files an appeal of a decision of Clarington Council in
respect of the proposed zoning by-law does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make
written submissions to the Municipality of Clarington before the proposed Zoning By-law is
adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:30
a.m. and 4:30 p.m. (8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. for the months of July and August) at the Planning
Department,40 Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario or by calling Richard Holy at 623-3379.
DATED AT THE MUNICIPALITY
OF CL ON
TT 2 D MARCH 2000
ame, e
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario L I C 3A6
PLANNING FILE: ZBA 2000-007
CLERK'S FILE: D14.ZBA 2000-007
5n3
i
SUBJECT SITE
LOT 33 NASH ROAD LOT 32
co
A BL'�K
HIGHWAY 2 cV
Z
S-�oN -- - °
LD K N�
ui
U
Q o �
0 U
Aw-
i
0
� M
lot
S
0
COURTICE
KEY MAP Z B A 2000-007
5 `� 4
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT: PD-041-00
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Landcrest Dev. Man.
on behalf of St. Stephens Estates
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington will hold a public
meeting to consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment under Section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, as
amended.
DATE: MONDAY, MAY 1, 2000
TIME: 9:30 A.M.
PLACE: Council Chambers, Municipal Administrative Centre,
40 Temperance St., Bowmanville, Ontario
The-proposed zoning by-law amendment, submitted by Landcrest Development Management on behalf of
St. Stephens Estates_Inc., would change the zone category of fourteen (14) properties located in Part Lot 8,
Coneessi-on 2, former Town of Bowmanville (as shown on the reverse) from "Holding - Urban Residential
Type One ((H)Rl)" and "Holding - Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)" to an appropriate zone in order
to permit the reduction of the exterior side yard setback from 6 metres to 4.5 metres.
The lands in question are also subject to the following application: Rezoning for Removal of Holding
Symbol (ZBA 2000-008).
ANY_PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in
support of or in opposition to the proposal. Please note that the time listed above reflects the time at which
the General Purpose and Administration Committee Meeting commences, not necessarily when this item
will be considered.
IF A PERSON OR PUBLIC BODY that files an appeal of a decision of Clarington Council in respect of the
proposed zoning by-law does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions to
the Municipality of Clarington before the proposed Zoning By-law is adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board
may dismiss all or part of the appeal.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposal is available for inspection between 8:30 a.m, and
4:30 p:m: (8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. for the months of July and August) at the Planning Department, 40
Temperance Street, Bowmanville, Ontario or by calling Bob Russell at 623-3379.
DATED AT THE MUNICIPALITY
OF CLARINGTON
THIS;27th DAY OF MARCH 2000
Patti r e, C1 t
unicipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
BOWMANVILLE, Ontario LIC 3A6
PLANNING FILE: ZBA 2000-008
CLERK'S FILE: D14 ZBA 2000-008
5 �� 5
SUBJECT SITES
LOT 9 LOT 8
N
z
o
Li
z
o
STREET w
z \
w
SPRUCEWOOD CRES
3LOSSOM BLVD. \
m
0
0 z
m
Z � '
DRIVE
13OWMANVILLE
KEY MAP ZBA 2000-0O8
5q6
DN: PD-39-00
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
PUBLIC MEETING
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File#
Date: Monday, May 1, 2000 Res. #
Report#: PD-039-00 File#: ZBA 2000-006 By-law#
-Subject: REZONING APPLICATION
-_ - APPLICANT: 1319164 ONTARIO LIMITED
PART LOT 26, CONCESSION 1, FORMER VILLAGE OF NEWCASTLE
FILE: ZBA 2000-006
i
- - i
I
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-039-00 be received;
2. THAT the rezoning application submitted by D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited on
behalf of 1319164 Ontario Limited be referred back to Staff for further processing and
preparation of a subsequent report pending receipt of all outstanding comments; and,
3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of
Council's decision.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 Applicant: 1319164 Ontario Limited
1.2 Agent: D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited
1.3 Rezoning: To rezone the subject lands from "Holding—Urban Residential
(H(Rl)) Zone"to permit six (6) single detached dwelling units.
1.4 Site Area: 1704m2 (0.42 ac)
6 'J 1
REPORT PD-039-00 PAGE 2
2. LOCATION
2.1 The subject lands are located at the rear of 483 King Street East in Newcastle (See
Attachment #1). The property is contained within Part Lot 26, Concession 1, in the
former Village of Newcastle.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 On February 25, 2000, the agent submitted a rezoning application to the Municipality of
Clarington to rezone the rear portion of 483 King Street East to permit the development
- - of six residential lots.
3.2 This subject parcel is abutted on the east, west and south sides by Draft Approved Plan of
Subdivision 18T-88061. The draft approved plan creates a parcel described as Block 253
which was designed to meld with the subject lot to allow the development of six
residential lots.
-4. SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES
4.1 The northerly portion of the property contains a single detached dwelling unit that has
frontage and access to King Street East. -
4.2_- _ Surrounding Uses:
East: Residential
i
North: Residential
i
West: Residential
South: Residential
i
5. OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
5.1 The lands are designated "Living Area" within the Durham Region Official Plan. The
goal of the Living Area designation is to provide a full range of housing.
5.2 Within Clarington Official Plan, the subject lands are designated "Urban Residential".
g �
The application conforms to the policies.
i
6 'J, L
i
I�
REPORT PD-039-00 PAGE 3
6. ZONING BY-LAW CONFORMITY
6.1 The subject lands are currently zoned "Holding — Urban Residential (H(R1)) Zone",
which permits single detached dwelling units with a minimum 15 metres of frontage.
The block (Block 253 of Draft Approved 18T-88061) to which this land will be melded is
i
currently zoned "Holding — Urban Residential Exception (H(R2-15))" which would
permit single detached dwellings with a minimum 12 metres of frontage. As a result, a
rezoning application was submitted for consideration.
_ I
7. PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSION
7.1 Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject site
jand a public meeting notice sign was installed on the lands.
I
7.2 As of the writing of this report, no inquiries have been received on this application.
8. AGENCY COMMENTS
8.1 The Clarington Fire Department, Veridian Connections, Clarington Building Division,
Peterborough, Victoria, Northumberland and Clarington Catholic District School Board
and the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board have no objections to the proposal.
8.2 The Clarington Public Works Department has no objections provided that the following
issues are addressed:
• All engineering and other works must conform to the approved engineering drawings
for adjacent plan of subdivision 18T-88061;
• The Applicant/Owner must provide this department with a Lot Grading Plan
satisfactory to the Director of Public Works;
• The Applicant will be required to make application for property access in conjunction
with this proposal. The applicant is responsible for any costs necessary to facilitate
the construction of an entrance from the subject property to William Jose Court.
• The Applicant must provide a total of six trees which form a portion of the
connecting boulevard. All planted trees must conform to Municipal standards;
6 I
REPORT PD-039-00 PAGE 4
• The applicant must provide an appropriate cash contribution in lieu of the normal
parkland dedication,
8.3 Comments remain outstanding from the Durham Regional Planning, Durham Regional
Public Works, Bell Canada, Canada Post Corporation and the Ganaraska Region
Conservation Authority.
I
9. COMMENTS
9.1 The subject parcel will be developed in conjunction with Block 253 of Draft Approved
Plan of Subdivision 18T-88061. This subdivision received draft approval on August 10,
1992 and has subsequently been amended five times, receiving approval of the fifth
amendment on December 22, 1999.
i
i
9.2 The first phase of this subdivision (40M-1976) located southeast of this subject parcel is
currently under construction.
10. CONCLUSIONS i
10.1 As the purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements of the Public Meeting under
the Planning Act, and taking into consideration all of the comments received, it is
respectfully requested that this report be referred back to Staff for further processing and
the preparation of a subsequent report.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
DaA rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Direc of Planning and Development Chief Administrative Officer
SA*LT*DJC*
i
Attachment#1 —Key Map
Attachment#2— Site Plan
654
REPORT PD-039-00 PAGE 5
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision.
D.G. Biddle & Associates Limited
96 King Street East
Oshawa, Ontario
L1H 1136
1319164 Ontario Limited
3845 Bathurst Street, Suite 103
Downsview, Ontario
M3H 3N2
i
h � 5
ATTACHMENT #1
SUBJECT SITE
LOT 27 LOT 26
� RESNIK DRIVE _ N
- ' CHALLENPER A DAR - Z
COURT STREET - -
-
INGSTE
- - {
-71 - _
-T _
0
(n
- -- �� w
ARD _ Z
- - \ 0
E
NEWCASTLE VILLAGE Z BA 2000-006
KEY MAP
606
N
I
Z
Lu
S EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED
4 ILJI TVi RInG•S RILMAY Iq.2 3'
DEVELOPMENT
Q / �®� —r„ I--
Q THE KING' S 1 1 1 GHWA Y NO . 2
7F�Q. I ��I E-11
C�N 72'16'0 E 7I.63 n
79 25 n 44 IS n ,xj `'<� f
N '
k t
-W—L6 CARTIQ FIIE"AY
N 3 6 N'xY N g �' ❑ EXl' 'T KEY PLAN
S/NLE
N.T.S.
FAM L Y
Ex/sr zoN/NC R1 ! = RESI DENT I AL
w �
3 ; N 72'16'00' E 7I.63 m 3c
Z A stk% `'P PROPOSED ZONING 'R-2- 15-
J
EXIST ZONANC (Hr R2-l5';-1>Q-EX/Sr ZON?NC 'IM R-1-43'
BLOCK 1139
oc
�`w� \—BLK 48—�
0 30 m ?ESERVr
W vV (_L I ibl C' r (� J F 1319164 ONTARIO LIMITED
D REZONING PLAN
D AF;T` APPROVED �LA� /8 /T- t�80(�/ PART 5. PLAN 40R-16419, PART OF LOT 26. CONC I
�{ ALL IN THE FORMER VILLAGE OF NEWCASTLE.
�I W J (GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF CLARKE)
NOW IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM
D.O.Biddle >g Associates Limited
C
C o n s u
96 KIN% STREET EAST - OSHAwA.ON LIM IB6
PMONE <905>576-8500 FAX <.05>376-9730
SCALE, 0.1 Om` 20mI I PROJECT NO 86257
ORA"eT' B.S.
DESIGN BT. w.0-C. DRAM NC N0.
CRECI BT. w.G C S P -
CAO FILE 6626TFC2 GATE JANUARY 2000
PLOT DATE• FE811.00
i
DNT040-00
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
i
REPORT
PUBLIC MEETING
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File#
Date: Monday, May 1, 2000 Res. #
Report #: PD-040-00 FILE #: ZBA 2000-007 By-law #
-Subject: REZONING APPLICATION
_— - APPLICANT: WILLIAM BRYANS
PART LOT 32, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF
DARLINGTON - 1560 HIGHWAY 2, COURTICE
FILE: ZBA 2000-007
Recommendations:
i
i
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
I
1. THAT Report PD-040-00 be received;
2. THAT the rezoning application submitted by Tunney Planning Inc., on behalf of William
- Bryans, be referred back to Staff for further processing and preparation of a subsequent
report pending receipt of all outstanding comments; and
3. THAT all interested -parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of
Council's decision.
i
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 Applicant:- William Bryans
i
1.2 Agent: Tunney Planning Inc.
1.3 Rezoning: To rezone the subject lands from "Urban Residential (R1) Zone" to
permit a professional office.
1.4 Site Area: 0.20 hectares (0.49 acres)
6 ri8
REPORT NO.: PD-040-00 PAGE 2
2. LOCATION
2.1 The subject lands are located at 1560 Highway 2 in Courtice (see Attachment #1). The
applicant's land holdings total 0.20 hectares (0.49 acres). The property is contained
within Part Lot 32, Concession 2, in the former Township of Darlington.
= 3. BACKGROUND
3.1 On February 28, 2000, the agent submitted a rezoning application to the Municipality of
Clarington to legalize the existing professional office use on the property.
i
3.2 The Zoning By-law permits a home occupation provided that no more than 25% of the
habitable-dwelling area is used. An investigation by our By-law Enforcement Division
revealed that more than 25% of the dwelling has been converted for use as a medical
office. As a result, the Owner was requested to submit a rezoning application to permit a
professional office use.
4. SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES
4.1 The property contains-a single detached dwelling unit that currently that has been
converted for use as a medical office (see Attachment #2). The entire site slopes gently
towards Black Creek. The rear of the property is partially wooded.
I
1
4.2 Surrounding Uses:
East - Urban residential
North - Black Creek valleylands
West - Urban residential
South - Urban residential and commercial plaza
5. OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
5.1 The lands are designated "Living Area" within the Durham Region Official Plan.
Limited office uses are permitted within this designation, provided that they do not
impact the function of planned Central Areas. The application conforms to the policies.
6 59
REPORT NO.: PD-040-00 PAGE 3
5.2 Within Clarington Official Plan, the subject lands are designated "Urban Residential:
Special Policy Area F - King Street Corridor". Permitted uses include limited office
development. Conformity y wil 1 be determined once a land use plan has been prepared for
this special policy area.
5.3 The property is adjacent to the Black Creek valleyland, which has been identified as a
"Cold Water Stream" and "Hazard Land" on the Official Plan's Natural Features and Land
Characteristics mapping. Section 4.3.8 of the Official Plan requires that an
environmental impact study be undertaken where development is located within 50
metres of a stream.
6. ZONING BY-LAW CONFORMITY
6.1 The subject lands are currently zoned "Urban Residential (RI) Zone", which does not
i
permit office development on the property. As a result, a rezoning application was
submitted for consideration.
7. PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSION
7.1 Public Notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the subject site j
and a public meeting notice sign was installed on the lands.
7.2 As of the writing of this report, no inquiries have been received on this application.
8. AGENCY COMMENTS
8.1 The Clarington Fire Department and Ontario Hydro Services Company have no
objections to the proposal.
8.2 The Clarington Public Works Department has no objections in principle to the rezoning
but noted that detailed comments would be provided at the site plan approval stage. A
change of use or building permit will be required.
610
REPORT NO.: PD-040-00 PAGE 4
8.3 The Durham Regional Health Unit has indicated that the existing septic system appears to
be undersized. Therefore, a new sewage system, designed by a qualified engineer, must
be installed for the proposal.
8.4 Central Lake Ontario Conservation indicates that the subject property may be affected by
flooding and erosion, the greater hazard being erosion of the slope by the Black Creek.
The Black Creek stream corridor contains diverse forest and fisheries characteristics and
provides for wildlife movement. The delineation of hazard lands, as well as tree
preservation, should be determined through the environmental impact study process.
Until these issues are addressed, the application is premature.
8.5 Comments remain outstanding from the Durham Regional Planning and Public Works
Departments.
9. COMMENTS
9.1 Although the applicant currently resides on the premises, in excess of 25% of the
habitable dwelling unit area is being used for home occupation purposes. As a result, this
application has been submitted for consideration.
Rezoning applications have been submitted on both sides of the subject lands to permit
professional office development. The Murphy/Stephenson (1556 Highway 2) and
West/West/Wilson (1564 Highway 2) applications have already been through the public
meeting process.
9.2 A number of issues including access to Highway 2, stormwater management, and the EIS
study must be examined comprehensively between all three properties. Cost savings
could be realized through sharing study costs for the EIS and stormwater management.
9.3 The EIS study has been initiated for all three properties. As any impacts are likely to be
minimal, the study process has been scoped. Staff expect that the study process will be
611
REPORT NO.: PD-040-00 PAGE 5
completed within 6 to 8 weeks.
9.4 The Municipality is experiencing development pressures along the Highway 2 corridor in
Courtice, especially in the Special Policy Area "F" lands. Based on Council's
- endorsement, the Planning Department has initiated a study of this area to determine an
appropriate land use, urban design, and transportation plan.
10. CONCLUSIONS
10.1 As the purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements for the Public Meeting under
the Planning Act, and taking into consideration all of the comments received, it is
respectfully requested that this report be referred back to Staff for further processing and
the preparation of a subsequent report.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
David . C ome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer.
*df
14 April 2000
Attachment#1 - Key Map
Attachment#2 - Site Plan
612
REPORT NO.: PD-040-00 PAGE 6
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Tony Rubino
Tunney Planning Inc.
340 Byron Street South, Suite 200
WHITBY, Ontario.
-- - LIN 4P8
William Bryans
I ,
Fred Elliot j
-Cindy Bosy
- I
i
i
613
ATTACHMENT #1
SUBJECT SITE
,LOT 33 NASH ROAD LOT 32
J
co
A
HIGHWAY 2 N
Zti-
�� 0
FOLD K NGS- t ` I t(n
-L U
�\ o
Z
OU
NI
O
- -- Ld -
A4
`o.
a
S
o
COURTICE
KEY MAP ZBA 2000-007
61 -
ATTACHMEINT #2
1213)
IOR
PLAN
0112
I
,,ART 26590 r
pIN
8j 1p°SI
N56'020 E��N fa 131
IPI PDOA rF�1-IEO�" TqTB m`� - ENO OF t,
FENCE ON L04C
5' Ei
p
1y n
V r5
0� ��-FENCE 0.1'EAST
N LF
_ � O
a �
_I
-- FENCE f FL OF HEDGE
n ' FENCE 0.3'WEST I
17 WEST
_ � O
CU1�'.,ES�I��I�' N
9,5r
W t
Y n 25er
U i
Q m lop. 1 V2 STOREY
—i E V1NYL SOM
NOB9E M ~
m z
use
a
'
19.63' L 13.19' I A
01
S.E An1h of ti b
Block II,PIan M- 747 $ n --�-____
(BY PLAN OCR-1871 OF HEDGE
FENCED I EASi----
-___ -- -- SIBnOOSI 9-1106) I l0'EAST�- rp RE I,PLAN/OR-551)
eor
-- )00/S'(PLAN(3)A SET) - L 70.00'P'LANr3)IDEEDI)l&M) 99.9f PLAN rt/MS.
1 -
- ---- N69122'30'E P7E7ERENCE eEARwa)
IDEP. PLAN N. 289 NWY'S)
'THE KING'S HIGH WA Y N' 2'
ZBA 2000-007
1560 HIGHWAY 2, COURTICE
615
DN:P041-00
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
PUBLIC MEETING
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date: Monday, May 1, 2000 Res. #
Report #: PD-041-00 FILE#: ZBA 2000-008 By-law #
Subject: REZONING APPLICATION
_- - APPLICANT: LANDCREST DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT INC. ON
BEHALF OF ST. STEPHENS ESTATES INC.
PART LOT 8, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWN OF BOWMANVILLE
FILE: ZBA 2000-008
Recommendations:
_ I
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-041-00 be received;
_ I
2. THAT the application to amend Comprehensive Zoning By-law 84-63 of the former
Town of Newcastle, submitted by Landcrest Development Management Inc. on behalf of
St. Stephens Estates Inc., be referred back to staff for further processing and the
preparation of a subsequent report following the receipt of the outstanding agency
comments; and
3. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of
Council's decision.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 Owner: St. Stephens Estates Inc.
1.2 Agent: Landcrest Development Management Inc.
1.3 Zoning: From "Holding - Urban Residential Type One ((H)Rl)" and
"Holding - Urban Residential Type Two ((H)R2)" to appropriate
zones to permit an exterior side yard setback of 4.5 metres.
616
REPORT NO.: PD-041-00 PAGE 2
1.4 Area: Eight (8) single detached lots with properties varying in size from
455 m2 to 702 mz and six (6) semi/link lots with properties varying
in size from 704 m' to 821 m`'.
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 On March 9, 2000, the Planning and Development Department received an application to
-- amend Zoning By-law 84-63 in order to permit exterior side yard setbacks of 4.5 metres
rather than 6 metres.
- j
2.2 The exterior (corner) properties subject to the proposal are located in the northerly or
draft approved "Phase 2" portion of the St. Stephens Estates subdivision, which is on the
east side of Meares Avenue. The lands are part of Lot 8, Concession 2, former Town of
Bowmanville.
3. EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES
3.1 The draft approved lots are currently vacant. -
3.2_- - The surrounding land uses are as follows:
i
North - Vacant and beyond, the Canadian Pacific Railway
South - the southerly or registered "Phase 1" portion of the St. Stephens
Estates subdivision and beyond, Concession Street East.
East - Bowmanville Creek and beyond, the Great Lakes College of
Toronto
West - Meares Avenue and beyond, vacant.
4. PUBLIC NOTICE AND SUBMISSIONS
4.1 Public notice was given by mail to each landowner within 120 metres of the fourteen (14)
properties and a Public Notice sign with a map showing the locations of the fourteen(14)
617
REPORT NO.: PD-041-00 PAGE 3
properties was installed on the Mearns Avenue frontage. There have been no inquiries to
date.
5. OFFICIAL PLAN CONFORMITY
5.1 Within the Durham Region Official Plan, the subject properties are designated as Living
Area in the Bowmanville Urban Area. The application conforms.
5.2 Within the Clarington Official Plan, the subject properties are designated as Urban
Residential in the Bowmanville Urban Area. The application conforms.
6. AGENCY COMMENTS
6.1 The rezoning was circulated to various agencies and other departments by the Planning
and Development Department. To date, comments have not been received from the
Clarington Public Works Department, the Regional Planning Department and the Central
Lake Ontario Conservation Authority.
7. STAFF COMMENTS
7.1 The purpose of this report is to give the status of the application for the public meeting,
and it is appropriate to have the application referred back to staff for further processing.
Re submitted, Reviewed by,
a . Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer.
BR*LT*DC*df
14 April 2000
Attachment#1 - Site Locations Key Map
Attachment#2 - Phase 2 of the St. Stephens Estates Subdivision
Attachment#3 - Site Triangle and Setbacks Diagram
618
REPORT NO.: PD-041-00 PAGE 4
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
St. Stephens Estates Inc.
c/o Landcrest Development Management Inc.
633 Edgeley Blvd., Unit No. 3
CONCORD, Ontario
L4K 4H6
619
ATTACHMENT #1
SUBJECT SITES
LOT 9 LOT 8
- . V)
V)
/ z
O
CU
j
STREET
SPRUCEWOOD CRES
3LOSSOM BLVD. \
— �
ul
- Z
DRIVE --
� o
BOWMANVILLE
KEY MAP Z B A 2000-008
b 2 0
ATTACHMENT Y,
PUN 40M—
tOClt N
S '
i0
< � S T A G E_ _ I
— ••.° - - - "-_ ,� PUN OF SUBOMSION OF
° e1 sTnn A K d PART OF LOT 8. CONCESSION 2
EORNEI'l IN THE -of 80W,-w
_ CE00W'HIC TOw 141P Of OAeUNGT0H
NOW 04 THE NUWCIPAIITY OF CtARINM,
9 to n u t3 a Is t �� REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM
s .•n •.'T a Ir 0.15
SCALE _ In000
si
t1 w ^
HACK dl tR S YEYOR'S CE1MMATE
o ..,L .. .. ' n..r:
z3 E: Y Yu.3Y wo run n.ttp«KmDmM
— 1 3 70 1 to 1 is 17 3 11 � Y ^I z � >d
..C u �.....,...,P«...,, <...� P..
^^ i s> t ---...-
V
Is E
etAnc 11 :i u 13 .'±
o
_. �
' r � NOTES
.— ,.. ... .. ._ .. r I .1 I."°"." _••� [S I ar�.c. « rw.n.w.o.rvwua ons•.wx rm~
SI >D eIMR ro m 2D I] 2e 1 73 14 ' � ��w,` ` _ a..ru eo..a na.cx u.n.a✓c,cnw+wn
` ._ .. .:,. ... � :� '� ': _° b•'rt.,t� �°• sue,,... i i
1 u u u 33 s4 37 Se w L iO 4.
sma
IQ
Kyy � s
J Y•4 ( u . = 9 u ' rT OWNERS CERTIFICATE
` SJ C Sz SI b N M 4 .T�'_ t �: — Y,nna suaOms+0w
t,u 1 47
'� r � "` ,. :` r� ..r u ,', .-..,• � •gym �[
t eIACN eE C SI SS r t r � or ra..0«.c r'•'•c nn n rrm..c.wn
M ) T
•l� J / � < N ' � I � ta.p.rr.'..«M w.cl.un«twso�«u MK wn.n.
m _( ._..... STAECT o •• ♦ � ..i � U E 9 r,/ o...+. - v.o_._._—._.cm
az ` % I SI. STEPHEN'S ESTATES INC.
4� I' \
,,1 A
�a 1
® SUBJECT SITES
621
ATTACHMENT #3
6m I =
4.5m -
�- BUILDIN
I G
f
ENVELOPE
o
z
w
W w U
CI
� � I
L �. ._
E `
Lo
SITE
TRIANGLE
7.5m
STREET
622
DN:P043-00
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File#
Date: Monday, May 1, 2000 Res. #
Report #: PD-043-00 FILE #: PLN 32.11.18 By-law#
Subject: DEFERRAL#38 TO THE CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN AS
REQUESTED BY BRUCE BROWN
PART LOT 31, CONCESSION 1,FORMER TWP. OF CLA-RKE=--
FILE: PLN 32.11.18 -
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
- recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-043-00 be received; - -
2. THAT the Region of Durham be requested to approve the Clarington Official Plan land
use designation as it applies to the area shown as Deferral#38;
3. THAT the Region of Durham Planning Department be forwarded a copy of this report;
and, -
4. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegation be advised of
Council's decision.
1. LOCATION
1.1 The lands in question are located on the west side of Rudell Road south of King Street in
Newcastle Village (Attachment#1). The applicant's land holdings total approximately 57
acres. The property is located in Part Lot 31, Concession 1, in the former Township of
Clarke.
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 A topographic survey prepared for the owner indicates that approximately 25 acres are
located within the floodplain while 32 acres are considered tableland. The area within the
floodplain is designated "Environmental Protection" while the remaining lands are
623
REPORT NO.: PD-043-00 PAGE 2
designated "Community Park" and "Urban Residential". The "Community Park"
designation is conceptual; the Plan provides for a community park between 4 to 12
hectares (10 to 30 acres) in size.
2.2 The Clarington Official Plan Review process examined the need for community park
facilities-within Newcastle Village. This property was identified through the Official
Plan review process as fulfilling the following criteria: I
size and configuration of available lands;
accessibility, visibility, and available street frontage; and,
location adjacent to open space area for connectivity to future trail corridor.
2.3 On September 17, 1996, Durham Regional Council, at the landowner's request, deferred
approval of the "Community Park" land use designation as it related to the subject lands.
The Owner was concerned about the impact that this designation would have on his land
value.
3. COMMENTS
3.1 Community parks are major facilities containing both active and passive recreational
uses. Active uses may include a hockey arena, indoor swimming pool, multipurpose
meeting facilities, library, and major baseball and soccer sports fields that are lit. Passive
uses may include connections to major trails along Wilmot Creek, walking paths, and
interpretative areas.
3.2 The Planning Department has discussed the issue of size and configuration of the
community park with the Public Works and Community Services Departments. They
have advised that the entire tableland area will be required to serve the future community
park needs of Newcastle Village. It is anticipated that the Municipality would purchase
the lands within a 15 year timeframe.
624
REPORT NO.: PD-043-00 PAGE 3
3.3 Although Staff have examined alternative locations, this site remains the preferred site for
the following reasons:
The site has approximately 30 acres of flat tableland, which is the amount required for
a community park. This permits development of buildings, parking areas, and sports
fields on the tableland area, with passive facilities in the floodplain area.
The site has the necessary road frontage required to provide visibility for the facility.
A second means of access can be obtained from Highway 2.
The site is adjacent to the Wilmot Creek, which allows the park to be integrated with
the future trail network in the area. This permits the public to enjoy the open space
areas.
The site is strategically located relative to important wildlife ecosystems such as the
Samuel Wilmot Conservation Area and the Wilmot Creek valleylands.
Municipal services, located on Rudell Road, can readily be extended to the property.
i
3.4 The Separate School Board is looking for a new school site in Newcastle Village because
the St. Francis of Assisi School is operating past its design capacity. The Board was
I
interested in acquiring a 6 acre parcel of land from Mr. Brown for a new elementary
school site. The Community Services, Public Works, and Planning Departments met
with the Board to discuss the matter. Based on past experience, the Municipality could
not support a school at this location for the following reasons.
I
Operational difficulties including loitering, vandalism, and behavioural issues make
schools and community parks a difficult match; and,
• Community parks contain many driveways and parking lots. Park traffic poses a
significant safety concern to young children, especially if they walk into traffic or
between parked cars.
At the meeting, School Board representatives agreed with these issues and are
subsequently examining other sites.
625
i
REPORT NO.: PD-043-00 PAGE 4
3.5 The Planning Department met with Mr. Brown to discuss the rationale for approving the
"Community Park" designation. Mr. Brown was also informed that a report would be
proceeding recommending approval of the land use designation. Mr. Brown had voiced
several concerns with the designation process.
• He feels that the "Community Park" designation hinders the sale of the property for
development purposes. Furthermore, the designation is an attempt by the
Municipality to devalue the property for purposes of expropriation.
I
Staff have attempted to assure Mr. Brown that the Municipality will purchase the
lands at fair market value, based on their land use designation and all other relevant
factors. While the Community Park designation may affect the value, a portion of the
lands are designated Urban Residential. Furthermore, any urban designation is an
improvement over the Permanent Agriculture Reserve designation which existed prior
to the preparation of the new Durham and Clarington Official Plans.
• Mr. Brown is concerned that the Municipality may not purchase the property for
another 15 years. If the Community Park is to be located on Mr. Brown's property,
then the Municipality should either purchase or option the lands immediately.
Otherwise, the park should be relocated to another location.
Staff are reviewing priorities for land acquisition at the current time. It should be
noted, however, that the Newcastle Community Park was not identified as a project
within the Development Charges Study.
• Mr. Brown feels that the Separate School Board should be granted approval for a
school on his property. This would provide some cash flow until the remainder of the
land is sold for development or park purposes.
Staff provided M•. Brown with the reasons as outlined in Section 3.4 indicating why
an elementary school could not be supported by Staff on the subject lands.
4. CONCLUSIONS
4.1 In light of the above, Staff therefore respectfully recommend that the Durham Regional
Council approve the "Community Park" land use designation as shown on Attachment
#2.
626
REPORT NO.: PD-043-00 PAGE 5
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
Davi Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. _ Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Direc r of Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer
Stephen A. Vokes, P. Eng. - -
ec r of Public Works
P J s h P. Caruana
ector of Community Services
*BN*DC*df
3 April 2000
Attachment#1 - Key Map
Attachment#2 - Excerpt of Map A4 - Land Use: Newcastle Village Urban Area
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Mr. Bruce Brown Mr. Joel Sloggett
Peterborough Victoria Northumberland and Clarington
Catholic District School Board
1355 Lansdowne Street West
PETERBOROUGH, Ontario
K9J 7M3
- 627
i
EXHIBIT " 1 "
DEFERRAL No. 38 TO THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON OFFICIAL PLAN,
MAP A4, LAND USE, NEWCASTLE VILLAGE URBAN AREA
CONCESSION ROAD 3
SPECIAL POLICY
AREA G��
r
51 1
Ut 1 i
Q��,
i®
SPECIAL
POLJCY
AREA E
i
o O AJ
OO KING STREET
t
0
APPROVE "COMMUNITY
PARK" LAND USE EDWARD (t STREET 4
DESIGNATION SUBJECT O
TO DEFERRAL No. 38 D38
z
o
HIGHWAY 401
i
t RRl00,
ti hr � O
LAKE OWAR/O
628
� 1
I '
/- I
j +102
i +102 85.
+10, \; s. ! _ HWAY 2 1 -s
' `I KING STREET WE
+98. . I EDWARD STREET WEST
\\\8 . +82.
m
J `
\
1
1 m 1 ' 1 DONCASTER CRESCE
\9
0.
y
\95. \ 1 1 \ \
+98 \, IGHWAY 4 --------�--------- -------- - --
' r` �•\ -
--- ------ ----
-GMW�Y 1 __
185.
`%';�: �--1-sue__ a�';�•' � � < �'"�
t 89.
Point Elevation
------- Contour elevation 5 metres +78. ;,85 \
� 1
r / >
r
\\ Vegetation
C/MAPINFOIP WJNING/STRATEGC/ATTACHMENTB/DEFERRAL38WOR
KEYMAP File: PLN 32.11 .18
6 29
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File#
Date: Monday, May 1, 2000 Res. #
Report #: PD-044-00 FILE #: A2000/011 TO A2000/016, INCLUSIVE
By-law#
Subject: MONITORING OF THE DECISIONS OF THE COMMITTEE OF
ADJUSTMENT FOR THE MEETING OF APRIL 20, 2000
FILE NO'S.: A2000/011 TO A2000/016, INCLUSIVE - --
Recommendations: -
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-044-00 be received;
2. THAT Council concur with the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment made on April
20, 2000 for applications A2000/011 to A2000/016, inclusive; and
3. THAT Staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to defend the
decisions of the Committee of Adjustment for applications A2000/011 to A2000/016,
inclusive, in the event of an appeal.
j -
1. In accordance with Section 45 of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, all applications received
by the Municipality for minor variance are scheduled to be heard within 30 days of being
received by the Secretary Treasurer. The-decisions of the Committee are detailed below.
2. The purpose of these minor variance applications and the Committee's decisions are
detailed in Attachment No. 1.
3. Application A2000/011 was postponed to the next meeting, May 11, 2000, as the
applicant did not meet the signage requirements of the Planning Act. The sign was
provided to the applicant by the Planning Department April 3, 2000 but was not posted
by the applicant. Notice for the meeting, including posting the sign on the subject
property must occur a minimum of ten(10) days prior to the meeting.
i
630
i
i
I
REPORT NO.: PD-044-00 PAGE 2
4. Applications A 2000/012 to A2000/014 inclusive were approved as applied for, subject to
the applicant submitting a satisfactory Lot Grading Plan to the Clarington Public Works
within 90 days.
i
5. Application A2000/015 was tabled for the next meeting, May 11, 2000, to allow the
_-- - applicant_time for discussion with the Municipality regarding the location of the proposed
_ - -- -driveway, outside the sight triangle formed by the corner of McFeeters Crescent..
6. Application A2000/016 was approved as applied for, subject to the applicant removing
the existing shed within ninety (90) days of a building permit being issued for the
proposed garage.
7. Staff have reviewed the Committee's decisions and are satisfied that the applications
which received approval are in conformity with the Official Plan policies, consistent with
the intent of the Zoning By-law and those approved are minor in nature and desirable.
8. Council's concurrence with the Committee of Adjustment decisions is required in order
to afford staff's official status before the Ontario Municipal Board in the event of an
appeal of any decision of the Committee of Adjustment.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
D id ome,M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P.,R.P.P.,
Directo f Planning &Development Chief Administrative Officer
SA*DJC*cc
25 April 2000
Attach.
631
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A00/011
********************
APPLICANT: DAVIE, CHRISTOPHER HOWAARD & LORI' ANN
AGENT: CUREATZ, SAM L.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
616 CHURCH STREET
PART LOT: 28 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP : NEWCASTLE
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: Rl-1 & EP
HEARING DATE : 20-Apr-00
DECISION: WITHDRAW
APPEAL DATE : 31-May-00
MINOR VARIANCE :
TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING SINGLE DETACHED DWELLING WITH AN
EXTYERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 5 . 88 M (19 . 3 FT) , INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED 6 M (19 . 68 FT) SETBACK
REASON FOR DECISION:
632
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A00/012
APPLICANT : VELTRI AND SON LILMITED
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
68 MCFEETERS CRESCENT
PART LOT: 08 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: Rl
HEARING DATE : 20-Apr-00
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE : 10-May-00
MINOR VARIANCE :
TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED LOT AREA FROM 550 SQ M (5920 . 3 SQ FT) TO
530 . 7 SQ M (5712 . 59 SQ FT) FOR SEMI DETACHED/LINKED DWELLINGS
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO A SATISFACTORY LOT
GRADING PLAN BEING SUBMITTED TO THE DIR. OF PUBLIC WORKS WITHIN 90
DAYS, AS THE APP. IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE 0 P &
ZONING BY-LAW & IS DEEMED MINOR & DESIRABLE.
633
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A00/013
APPLICANT: VELTRI AND SON LILMITED
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
74 MCFEETERS CRESCENT
PART LOT: 08 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE -
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: Rl
HEARING DATE : 20-Apr-00
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE : 10-May-00
MINOR VARIANCE :
TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED LOT AREA FROM 550 SQ M (5920 . 3 SQ FT) TO
430 SQ M (4629 SQ FT) FOR SEMI DETACHED/LINKED DWELLINGS
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO A SATISFACTORY LOT
GRADING PLAN BEING SUBMITTED TO THE DIR. OF PUBLIC WORKS WITHIN 90
DAYS, AS THE APP. IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE O P &
ZONING BY-LAW & IS DEEMED MINOR & DESIRABLE.
634
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A00/014
********************
APPLICANT: VELTRI AND SON LILMITED
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
80 MCFEETERS CRESCENT
PART LOT: 08 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP: BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: Rl
HEARING DATE : 20-Apr-00
APPEAL DATE : 10-May-00 DECISION: APPROVED
MINOR VARIANCE :
TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED LOT AREA FROM 550 SQ M (5920 . 3 SQ FT) TO
455 . 8 SQ M (4906 . 35 SQ FT) FOR SEMI DETACHED/LINKED DWELLINGS
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO A SATISFACTORY LOT
GRADING PLAN BEING SUBMITTED TO THE DIR. OF PUBLIC WORKS WITHIN 90
DAYS, AS THE APP. IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE 0 P &
ZONING BY-LAW & IS DEEMED MINOR & DESIRABLE .
635
i
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
I
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A00/015
********************
APPLICANT: VELTRI AND SON LIMITED
AGENT :
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
57 MCFEETERS CRESCENT
PART LOT: 08 CONCESSION: 1
TOWNSHIP : BOWMANVILLE
PLAN NUMBER: 40R-19553-19
ZONING: Rl
HEARING DATE: 20-Apr-00
DECISION: TABLED
APPEAL DATE : 10-May-00
MINOR VARIANCE :
TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6 M (19 . 68
FT) TO 1 . 8M (5 . 9 FT) FOR A SEMI DETACHED/LINKED DWELLING.
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION BE TABLED TO THE MAY 11, 2000 MEETING, TO
ALLOW THE APPLICANT TIME FOR DISCUSSION REGARDING LOCATION OF THE
DRIVEWAY
636
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
PERIODIC REPORT
FILE NUMBER: A00/016
APPLICANT: KNAPP, ARTHUR & LYNNE
AGENT:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
103 ELGIN STREET
PART LOT: 12 CONCESSION: 2
TOWNSHIP : BOWMANVILLE
I
PLAN NUMBER: - -
ZONING: Rl
HEARING DATE : 20-Apr-00
DECISION: APPROVED
APPEAL DATE: 10-May-00
MINOR VARIANCE :
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACC. BUILDING THAT WILL INCREASE
THE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE OF ACC. BUILDINGS FROM THE MAXIMUM 40% TO
42 . 5% OF THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF THE DWELLING. THE ACC. BUILDING
WILL HAVE A GROUND FLOOR AREA OF 55 . 7 SQ M (600 SQ FT) .
REASON FOR DECISION:
THAT THE APPLICATION IS CONSIDERED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OP &
ZONING B/L & DEEMED MINOR & DESIRABLE, THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED
AS APPLIED FOR, SUBJECT TO THE EXISTING SHED BEING REMOVED WITHIN
90 DAYS OF A BUILDING PERMIT BEING ISSUED FOR THE GARAGE
637
i
DN: PD-045-00
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File#
Date: Monday, May 1, 2000 Res. #
Report #: PD-045-00 File#: PLN 25.1.21 By-law#
Subject: MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON – PROPOSED STREET NAME
CHANGE FOR A PORTION OF WAVERLY ROAD AND=-WATSON
DRIVE - -- _ - -
PLN 25.1.21 -
Recommendations: - -
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-045-00 be received; _
2. THAT By-law 86-112, being a by-law to establish a Street Name Map and Street Name
Inventory in the Municipality of Clarington, be amended to provide for the following
street name changes: a portion of "Waverly Road" to "Watson Crescent"; "Watson
Drive" to "Watson Crescent"; and a portion of"Waverly Road" to "Cedar Crest Beach
Road".
3. THAT Council authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute the attached by-law to amend
By-law 86-112 being a by-law to establish the Street Name Map and Street Name
Inventory in the Municipality of Clarington.
4. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of
Council's decision.
1. - BACKGROUND
.1 —Irr-a-prevrous agree -and Blue Circle Canada a Inc., it was
agreed that a portion of Waverly Road will be closed and conveyed to Blue Circle.
Waverly Road will remain in municipal ownership to the north and south of the
transferred portion. Since the southern portion of Waverly Road will be separated from
the northerly portion, it is necessary to rename this southerly section of the road
(Attachment No.1).
638
REPORT PD-045-00 PAGE 2
1.2 A report requesting authorization to place public notices in the local newspapers for the
proposed street name change for this section of road was presented to the March 20, 2000
General Purpose and Administration Committee. At its meeting of March 27, 2000,
Council adopted the following Resolution:
"THAT staff be authorized to advertise the necessary notice advising of a
proposed street name change for Watson Drive and the portions of
Waverly Road identified in Report PD-026-00".
1.3 Three houses will be affected by the proposed changes. Two of the houses will need to
change their--addresses from "Watson Drive" to "Watson Crescent", and one house will
need to change their addresses from "Waverly Road" to "Watson Crescent' if the
Proposed street name change By-law is passed.
2. PUBLIC MEETING AND SUBMISSION
- 2.1 Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Act, the proposed name change was
advertised for four (4) consecutive weeks in either the Canadian Statesman and/or
Clarington This Week, being the week of March 27, 2000 through to the week of April
17, 2000. In addition,_those land owners having properties fronting onto or abutting the
effected streets have been sent individual notices.
2.2 At the time of writing this report, the Planning Department has not received any enquiries
either written or verbal in respect of the notice.
3. AGENCY COMMENTS
3.1 The Region of Durham comments on street name changes to ensure that duplication of
`-- ` -s ro�tnames wi -in t e egion d0 not-occur. The Durham Region Plannmg Department
was circulated the proposed name changes, and the Region advised verbally that they
have no concerns with the street name changes as proposed.
4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
4.1 The transfer of a portion of Waverly Road to Blue Circle Canada Inc. effectively severs
639
REPORT PD-045-00 PAGE 3
the southerly portion of Waverly Road from the northerly portion of Waverly Road. It is
appropriate to rename the southern portion of Waverly Road as the closure and
conveyance of the land to Blue Circle effectively stops passage along Waverly Road.
Maintaining the street name Waverly Road to the south of Blue Circle's lands will create
confusion with drivers, delivery and emergency vehicles. Presently, Watson Drive
intersects with the southern portion of Waverly Road. It is recommended that Waverly
Road be renamed "Watson Crescent", and Watson Drive be renamed "Watson Crescent"
reflecting the crescent road pattern.
4.2 A small portion of Waverly Road abuts Cedar Crest Beach Road, and this portion of road
is the logical extension of Cedar Crest Beach Road. It is recommended that this portion
of Waverly Road be renamed "Cedar Crest Beach Road".
4.3 The proposed changes to the street names will eliminate future confusion for drivers,
delivery and emergency vehicles. It is recommended that the attached by-law proposing
changes to the Street Name Map and Street Name Inventory be passed.
Zi . bmitted, Reviewed by,
cv
rome, M.0.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning and Development Chief Administrative Officer
HB*BN*DJC*cd
Attachment#1 - Key Map
Attachment#2 - Proposed By-law
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision.
Valerie Dostie .Cohn Karoly
Thomas William McPherson
C/O 287409 Ontario Limited
I
640
REPORT PD-045-00 PAGE 4
2200 Yonge Street
Suite 800
Toronto, Ontario
M4S 2C6
i
Robert Kernohan
I
i
Wilson Little
Blue Circle Canada Inc.
R.R. #2
410 Waverly Road South
Bowmanville, Ontario
L1C 3K3
Blue Circle Canada Inc.
400 Waverly Road S.
- R.R. #2
Bowmanville, Ontario
L1C 3K3
641
i
ATTACHMENT #1
0
LOT 13
BROKEN FRONT CONCESSION
v
WATSON
° O
CL ?�
W:•
;Q
•�•:
........ G� ROAD
\ S�
CEDAR GCE
o � -
c -
>. C'
v �
® Road to be renamed from "Watson Drive" to "Watson Crescent"
Road to be renamed from "Waverly Road" to "Watson Crescent"
® ,Road to be renamed from "Waverly Road" to
Cedar Crest Beach Road"
642
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON ATTACHMENT V
BY-LAW NUMBER 99-
being a By-law to amend By-law 86-112, a by-law to establish a
Street Name Map and Street Name Inventory in the Municipality of
Clarington
WHEREAS pursuant to Section 210 (111) of the Municipal Act, R,S,O. 1990, chapter M.45, the
Council of the local Municipality map pass by-laws for giving names to or changing the names of
highways of public property;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it
advisable-to amend the Street Name Map and Street Name Inventory for roads in the Municipality;
AND WHEREAS such Street Name Map and Street Name Inventory establishes an official name
for all improved roads and those unimproved roads with summer maintenance only for the
Municipality of Clarington;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality
of Clarington enacts as follows:
i
1. Schedule "A" to the Street Name Map and Schedule "B" the Street Name Inventory, be
amended to:
a) change the name of a portion of "Waverly Road"to"Watson Crescent'
b) change the name of"Watson Drive"to"Watson Crescent'
C) change the name of a portion of"Waverly Road"to"Cedar Crest Beach Road"
r
BY-LAW read a first time this day of 2000.
BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2000.
BY-LAW read a third time and finally passed this day of 2000.
MAYOR
CLERK
643
DNT046-00
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File#
Date: Monday, May 1, 2000 Res. #
Report#: PD-046-00 FILE #: PLN 23.10.2 By-law #
Subject: REMOVING ROADBLOCKS - A STRATEGIC TRANSPORTATION -
PLAN FOR THE GTA AND HAMILTON-WENTWORTI-r --GREATER TORONTO TORONTO SERVICES BOARD (GTSB) _ -
PLN 23.10.2 -
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report PD-046-00 be received and endorsed as the Municipality's comments on
"Removing Roadblocks - A Strategic Transportation Plan for the GTA and Hamilton-
Wentworth";
2. THAT a copy of this report, the GO Station Location Study (1993), and the Bowmanville
West Main Central Secondary Plan and Urban Design Plan be forwarded to the GTSB for
their consideration; and
3. THAT a copy of this report be forwarded to the Commissioner of Works and
Commissioner of Planning for Durham Region.
1. BACKGROUND
At its meeting on February 4, 2000, the GTSB approved the circulation of the Strategic
Transportation Plan for the Greater Toronto Area and Hamilton-Wentworth to member
municiyaalities and other stakeholders for comments by April 3,_2010. &ubs_equently,on_
March 3, 2000 the Board adopted the recommendation from the Transportation
Committee that the recommended Actions for Implementing the Draft GTSB Strategic
Transport Plan be circulated for comments and that the deadline for comments be
extended to May 15"'.
644
i
i
REPORT NO.: PD-046-00 PAGE 2
The Plan was prepared as part of the GTSB's mandate to promote co-ordinated
transportation planning throughout the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth particularly with
respect to transit.
The purpose of the Plan is to provide the framework for developing a co-ordinated
transportation system for the GTA and Hamilton and to facilitate discussions with
potential funding partners. The Plan is also intended to serve as the starting point for
more detailed planning on specific transportation facilities and related services.
The impetus for the preparation of the Plan is the need to address a number of challenges
facing the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth. Rapidly growing population base, the need to
maintain the competitiveness of the area to ensure jobs are available for the growing
population, and maintaining the quality of life in the area are all important triggers.
2. DISCUSSION
2.1 Highlights of the Plan
The GTSB Strategic Transportation Strategic Plan emphasises getting the most efficient
use of the existing roads and transportation network by enhancing the existing system
within short term and expanding it in the long term. It has two main thrusts: - enhanced
movement of goods and services and an aggressive focus on transit.
A summary of the draft Strategic Transportation Plan is contained in a presentation
prepared by the GTSB (Attachment #1). Recommended Actions for Implementation are
also appended (Attachment#2).
The draft Plan has five elements:
• building a GTA - wide transit network including GO Transit, rapid transit and feeder
bus services;
• a co-ordinated approach to the planning and delivery of inter-regional transit services;
645
REPORT NO.: PD-046-00 PAGE 3
• building a GTA - wide goods movement network including expressways, arterial
roads, rail and intermodal freight facilities;
• optimizinig the use of existing assets;
• phased implementation of the elements of the system.
i
The Plan identifies seven key GTA transit corridors that can accommodate a mix of
transit services and that can be upgraded over time. It also identifies transit gateways
where motorists might be encouraged to switch to transit for the remainder of their trip.
Various strategies such as priority signals or exclusive lanes are proposed that would give
transit an advantage over automobiles. GTA east from Bowmanville through Oshawa
City Centre, Whitby, Ajax, Pickering and Scarborough City Centre to Don Mills station
on the Shepherd subway line is identified as one of the seven corridors.
To improve transit use, the Plan calls for improved GO Transit rail service on all existing
lines, including enhanced rush hour service and better all-day service. Specific service
improvements are listed for various lines and new service and extensions of service are
also identified. Extension of the Lakeshore East. line to Bowmanville, as well as
enhanced GO Bus services to Newcastle, are identified. The Plan also calls for full
service to Oshawa.
Another element of the Plan is a proposal for a co-ordinated approach to the planning and
delivery of transit services between GO Transit and the sixteen individual transit systems
currently in operation. Co-ordination of transit fares, routes and services are proposed.
The Plan proposes specific improvements to the road network which would facilitate the
movement of goods. The extension of Highway 407 to Highway 35/115, and
construction of a connecting expressway from the proposed Highway 407 to Highway
401 east of Courtice are identified as future expressways.
646
REPORT NO.: PD-046-00 PAGE 4
2.2 Staff Comments
Staff believe that traffic congestion is the most important transportation problem facing
the GTA today. Increase population and economic growth in the future will likely
exacerbate this problem.
It is felt-that the draft Plan is a first step in the right direction in dealing with the current
and future transportation problem in the GTA. Recognizing that additional analysis
needs to be undertaken to implement some of the proposed initiatives, staff is generally
supportive of the Plan as presented. Notwithstanding this, the following are specific
comments on the key thrust of the Plan:
a) Although it is agreed that transit improvements can contribute towards the
efficiency and sustainability of the entire transportation system, it should be
recognized that this solution may not be efficient or effective in the suburban/rural
areas. The report needs to examine further the appropriate level of
automobile/transit mix in suburban areas and funding should be provided for
roadways as well as transit where warranted.
i
b) The Plan indicates that the various proposed initiatives will be phased in over a
number of years, but gives no indication of cost, funding sources or timing for
each element of the transportation system. In order to assess how realistic the
Plan is, more information is needed on cost and funding strategies and timing for
phasing in the various strategies. This aspect of the work is proposed to be
completed-by-2005.
C) The success of the proposed Plan is dependent on a radical shift from automobile
dependency to transit use. A number of strategies are proposed to enable this shift
to occur, however, the plan does not propose a strategy to educate the public about
the use and benefits of transit. Education and marketing strategies must be
planned and implemented to encourage greater use.
647
REPORT NO.: PD-046-00 PAGE 5
d) A GTA Transportation Centre should be identified in Bowmanville where the
future GO Rail line intersects with the Highway 2 transit corridor. The
Bowmanville West Main Central Area Secondary Plan provided for a GO station
and bus station on lands at the south end of Clarington Boulevard.
e) The GTSB Strategic Transportation Plan should provide for the garly_acquisition
of appropriate lands for a Bowmanville GO Station. The GO station site was
identified in 1993. As development activity continues in the Bowmanville West
Main Central Area, the protection of these lands will become increasingly difficult
without a solid commitment to acquire the site.
f) The Plan identified property taxes and development charges asAhe-main funding
mechanisms for GO Transit. The Plan, however, is not clear on how the
development charges will be apportioned amongst the municipalities affected. It
is our view that any development charges should be weighted towards those areas
that accrue greater benefits.
g) Municipalities should be kept involved in the further development of this Plan to
ensure co-ordination particularly with respect to corridor protection.
The Clarington Public Works Department has reviewed this report and concurs with its
contents.
- 3 CONCLUSIQN
Staff support the efforts of the GTSB in preparing the Strategic Transportation for the
GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth. However, it should be cautioned that a balanced
approach is critical to success as a transit focussed solution can only be effective in areas
with large masses of densely population. Alternative solution may have to be found for
lower density suburban/rural area.
648
REPORT NO.: PD-046-00 PAGE 6
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
r
41rome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
lanning & Development Chief Administrative Officer.
BN*DC*df
25 April 2000
i
Attachment#1 - Presentation on Strategic Transportation Plan draft GTSB
Attachment#2 - GTSB - Recommended Actions for Implementation
I
649
i
ATTACHMENT #1
F I V
W73P
F
Greater Toronto Services Board
• The Greater Toronto Services Board has released a draft Strategic
Transportation Plan for the Greater Toronto Area and Hamilton-Wentworth for
discussion and comments.
• This presentation explains the foundations of the draft Plan, describes the key
elements of the Plan, and outlines how the GTSB is consulting with people and
stakeholder organizations across the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth.
1
650
II
GTA
Hamilton-Wentworth
Challenges
• Growth
• Economic competitiveness
• Natural environment
• Quality of life
• Infrastructure investment
The GTSB Strategic Transportation Plan was drafted in view of some
important challenges facing the Greater Toronto Area and Hamilton-
Wentworth.
• Accommodating high rates of population growth
• Maintaining the competitiveness of the area to ensure that jobs grow along
with the population
• Protecting the integrity of our natural environment
• Ensuring that our quality of life is maintained as we grow
• Investing in the infrastructure we need to achieve all of these objectives
2
651
Anticipated Growth
• 2 million more people by 2021
• 1.4 million jobs
• 1 million additional vehicles
• 5 million additional trips per day - -
This area is facing some of the highest growth in North America.
• Growing at a pace of 100,000 people each year, it is anticipated that another
2 million people and 1.4 million jobs will be added to the GTA/Hamilton-
Wentworth area by 2021.
• In the next 20 years, it is anticipated that another 1 million vehicles, making
an additional 5 million trips each day will be added to the GTA/Hamilton-
Wentworth Area.
Congestion is already a threat to our quality of life and economic
competitiveness.
This growth shows the importance of addressing our transportation issues
today.
3
6 5 Z
GTA/H--W
Today
• 5.1 million residents (46% of Ontario's
population)
• 2.7 million jobs
• 50% of gross provincial product
• 21% of gross national product
• 2.78 million vehicles
• 10 million trips per day
• The challenges facing the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth affect all of
Ontario and all of Canada.
• This area already has over 5 million people and 2.7 million jobs, representing
nearly half of Ontario's population and a significant proportion of the
economic activity in Ontario and Canada.
• Nearly 3 million vehicles in the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth are already
generating 10 million trips per day, moving people, goods and services.
4
653
.< 6'1i. '77," i�N ®ice 6
11IRYIt01r
•` _��3..s ,f?`�' X� �aS'La 1LYC}UI�fT TbY1pQ tS+�!i"t� ��a:ttn pa r tst
rp a� e s�� z l t �g cssmx 1� t�'i� ao+a SPOL2�+c�E'ss', st nt i
'�� •z.ter I t f T�������g 8�' r k` o. x 6y�tL........•,:4.ilr c3 ears.
� ,I,..
j t •uru•,_�
A,_,�4 r•'--t - ^'''
lu
so I o
•
rte— --- ----.—•i c���pp ,��"
kl
More people and more jobs mean more travel — especially east to west across
the GTA as employment centres grow in every city and town.
•
URBAf1 A9RICYLTURAL AND 9AE6NLAND AR8A6 y ., �£ �,} "'E 1�
a. x
�- � — --•i ^. ` Ili _- - w' arse Map t
The official plans of GTSB member municipalities, which guide the location
and pattern of development over the next 10-20 years, provide the basis for the
draft GTSB Strategic Transportation Plan.
The pink shading on this map shows the existing and designated urban areas as
identified in the official plans.
The map also illustrates the importance of the rural and agricultural areas (in
brown), valleylands and other green spaces (in green) and the Niagara
Escarpment and the Oak Ridges Moraine (in white).
7
656
i
..r.u
Removing Roadblocks
To Continued Economic Prosperity
For the Greater Toronto Area,Ontario and Canada
A Strategic Transportation Plan
For the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth
January 2000
• The Province and municipalities have been working on transportation issues
in the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth for several years—this Plan builds on all
of that work, but is the first time a proposed plan has been prepared for public
discussion.
• The Plan is the result of considerable work by GTSB staff in collaboration
with a team of professionals drawn from across the GTA and Hamilton-
Wentworth.
• The Plan provides the basis for co-ordinated planning of all parts of the inter-
regional transportation system —expressways, arterial roads, GO rail and bus,
rapid transit and feeder buses—all are important and service levels on one
influence conditions on the others.
• A strategic and practical approach has been taken, making the most of
existing transportation infrastructure.
• The Plan is a starting point intended to engage members, stakeholders and
public in a focused dialogue.
it has two in aj n th
1. Enhanced movement of goods & services
2. Aggressive focus on transit
8
h � 7
Transportation Investment
Partnership
• required for implementation
• federal, provincial and municipal governments
• fundamental to economic competitiveness
• vital to Canada's greenhouse gas commitments
• long term, stable investment
• GTSB transportation accord
• Implementation of a GTSB transportation plan will require a transportation investment partnership of
the federal,provincial and municipal governments and involvement of the private sector in the search for
solutions.
•Municipal governments in the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth do not have the capacity to address our
transportation crisis alone,having only two funding sources available—property taxes and development
charges. Just to meet the estimated funding shortfall of$800 million per year would require a property
tax increase of$10.6%or a"transportation development charge"of approximately$7,500 per new
housing unit constructed.
• Ensuring the economic health of the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth is vital to the economic future of
theprovince and the nation. The area already represents half of Ontario's economic activity and nearly
60%of the growth. The area accounts for one-fifth of Canada's economic output and nearly 40%of the
nation's population growth.
•Overcoming congestion in this and other urban regions is also key to improving the quality of our air
and to meeting Canada's international commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
• Implementation of the plan to address congestion and maintain our competitive edge over competing
urban regions in the U.S. will require a long term commitment to stable levels of investment in the
transportation network to the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth.
•The Greater Toronto Services Board and its member municipalities are working in collaboration with
private sector and community stakeholders to focus the provincial and federal governments on this issue.
At the February 4 meeting of the Greater Toronto Services Board,public and private sector stakeholders
rese H ,
long-term and stable investment in the transportation network serving the Greater Toronto Area and
Hamilton-Wentworth. Signatories to the Accord include,among others: Air Canada,the Bank of Nova
Scotia,Sun Media Corporation,York Universitv, Humber College,the Urban Development Institute,the
Toronto Real Estate Board,the Ontario Traffic Conference,the Ontario Road Builders Association,the
Carpenters and Allied Workers Union,the Learning Enrichment Foundation,the Canadian Urban Transit
Association,the Ontario Chambers of Commerce and boards of trade and chambers from Toronto,
Hamilton, Burlington,Milton, Halton Ilills, Mississauga,Brampton, Richmond Hill, Ajax-Pickering and
Greater Oshawa.
•The Plan provides the basis for these discussions with the federal and provincial governments.
9
658
i
Strategic
Transportation Plan
• GTA transit network
• Co-ordinated transit
• GTA goods movement network
• Optimizing existing assets
• Phased implementation
The Plan has five elements:
• A GTA-wide transit network including GO Transit, rapid transit and
feeder bus services running on the arterial road system
• A co-ordinated approach to the planning and delivery of inter-
regional transit services in the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth
• A GTA-wide goods movement network incorporating expressways
and arterial roads, rail and inter-modal freight facilities
• Provisions for optimizing the use of existing assets
• An emphasis on the phased implementation of elements of the system
10
659
i
�I
GTSB w.,_...-.— -,
LONGTERM(2021-)GTA TRANSIT NETWORK
i
�< E, YAK.s, M vn f. �.4•f
Wli' ti, -
-
N -
...... Nrrt......wo.w.n..csy
� w...wwar.,w i✓:s w..ww...
The long-term GTA transit network is shown on this map.
• The network of GTA transit corridors, shown by the blue lines include some
form of transit in separate rights-of-ways, be they priority bus routes, streetcars
or subway extensions
• Services and facilities in each corridor are proposed to evolve as ridership
grows. The Plan proposes the development of implementation strategies for
each corridor, setting out a phasing program and criteria to guide the timing of
I
each phase
11
660
�.rM � }''�.�+ F".... � �'i� v.Fe .1�"y�Yf'�`..`41'it t`.t.4 r.' ... ,f('1r�r y.r�{r • '):sue.
ik, S� r( 1i1���+����!__��'Y_�.•W9�PYY�.rr ..N N r•�• �� 4•:~YI•".y,_�— �5-.i
hours Enhanced GO Transit rail services on all existing lines, especially during peak
- element
661
xtt
;4
...the expansion and improvement of Union Station. This is necessary to
enhance its role as the most important inter-modal transit centre in the region.
In fact, the expansion of Union Station is required for any significant
improvements to the GO rail network.
�I
13
662
I
i
}
. "` WO �
" :... V
Y
t nfs v n xis �'� "77
r
I
,: � R"vv c# ttiY,etr
x
• The Plan identifies a series of GTA transportation centres, where different
modes intersect and co-ordinated transit and customer services are offered.
i
I
14
663
i
I
��.�1r'k•I' �� ,�, 1 I 1
j} t
4
Al
t '
r'
The Plan also proposes:
• Improved feeder bus services into GO Transit rail and rapid transit services,
including GO Transit bus services to smaller urban centres,
• A network of transit priority routes with measures to speed the flow of buses
in mixed traffic, and
• Enhanced connections to Pearson Airport, including connections to the
Georgetown GO line and links to transit corridors to the north and south of the
airport
These elements of the transit network in particular depend on ensuring a high
quality network of arterial roads throughout the GTA and Hamilton-
Wentworth
15
664
Co-Ordinated
GTA-Aide Transit
• Service co-ordination
• Transit fares
• Customer information
• Planning
The second element of the Plan relates to the co-ordination of transit services
across the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth. This includes building on existing
service co-ordination across municipal boundaries, moving toward more
i
convenient and co-ordinated arrangements for transit fares across jurisdictions,
providing more accessible information on transit schedules, routes and fares
across the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth, and taking a more integrated
approach to planning for interregional transit services.
16
i
I ONGTFR4 1121121♦)<l)(NJ<4I1)41.1IF.\t'.\F'i\l'(JR A `-���,.,..._
at
L
;nvq CO.u.N � Mpx
•••••. JItlRewsi
. O .•,r......«v wrr.a..v.,.�, t:.� `e""rr"" KcJ CU,;e,.a w..,..-r,
• The Plan identifies a GTA goods movement network comprising
expressways, arterial roads, rail routes, connections to airports, ports and
intermodal freight facilities. A number of key connections are identified,
including extensions of highways 404, 407, 410, 427, and the Lincoln
Alexander Expressway (Red Hill Creek Expressway).
• A number of expressway widenings at key bottlenecks are also anticipated.
• The Plan recognizes the need to improve connections to key border crossings
along our vital trade corridors.
• The Plan emphasizes the need to complete and maintain the highway and
arterial road networks as the basis for moving not only goods, but also people,
transit and professional services such as courier and delivery.
17
666
J;';-'::'i Cif=�.xag't- �••.:�..,,.,�{ ' �ez,� � ""'�S`y't� ,c-
t fwa�r l�
� 8`�3e�,.x nay
.F
'.' i a.: .-•*i''x t Hit }" i-� Sit t� � a'�� �'•a�.e`ta�z� �.R'�4
- �.x 7�
r � ti:iS"'• t' k•`a}ed,` 1 NL''�`F(.1 X yfi T Ei �,.
x9.�,i.:
*" '°��'btR� h.• �t a•S �\i},<..�°�r`iu{'1. a.a:., aee
' raYStic� ^�, `"`� L �1��l�� ett�e i►�'r�Ci��Rua �,• e•tn•nt r'j'
If
��� �,y. •#• k•,r` Si rk{ s` � 7�wiiJ1 YSJf ai0�dc���� vc�'+�.t
1••I•QMP ^"��ii1r^� .�'"'�.F�� � t �� !.-....�i� ^x+x.a..Y�.l� •n....w J. ..\L.w.s: .:L..:��.
}/lj1 5y ^t v�� • ,t
i
I
Implementing Actions
Approved for 2000
- Transit corridor analysis
- Goods movement analysis
- Transportation investment strategy
- Integrated transit information systems -
- Co-ordinated GO development charges -
- Critical expressway congestion points
- Harmonize EA processes
The Greater Toronto Services Board has approved some key work needed to
move forward with implementation.
• A transit corridor analysis to sort out phasing and priorities in the GTA
transit network will be designed to meet first phase EA requirements
• A goods movement analysis to provide essential information on the origins,
destinations and movements of goods and services, needed to move forward on
strategic improvements to the network
• A transportation investment strategy to engage the federal and provincial
governments in a partnership needed to-implement the plan
• The development of an integrated transit information system, using digital
mapping, to afford transit riders with easy access to information on the routes,
fares and schedules for cross-boundary trips
• Co-ordinated actions and development charges for GO Transit expansion,
identification of short-term improvements need to address existing congestion
- points in our expressways, and harmonization of the federal and provincial
environmental assessment process to avoid costly duplication of time an
effort
19
668
2000 Pending Adoption
Of Strategy
• GO Bus service options for 10 years
• Union Station design and phasing
• O.P. Protection of GTA Transit
Corridors
• Transit co-ordination protocol
• Municipal endorsement of vision and
objectives
Once the GTSB has adopted the Strategic Transportation Plan, a number of
further actions are recommended:
• Identification of options for improving GO Bus service over the next 10
years
• Development of detailed design and phasing plans for the expansion and
improvements to Union Station
• Protection of the GTA transit corridors set out in the Plan through municipal
official plans, as they come up for review
• Adoption by the Board, GTSB municipalities and transit operators of a
protocol on matters relating to interregional co-ordination of transit services
• Endorsement by GTSB municipalities of the vision and objectives set out in
the Plan
20
669
I�
II,
2001
• GO improvements & long-term strategy
• gateways & commuter lots
• bus feeder services & priority transit
• corridor protection
• transit co-ordination priorities
• specialized transit/transportation
• goods movement
• incident management
• freeway traffic management system
Recommended actions in 2001 build on the work completed in 2000:
• Commencing implementation of the GO Transit 10-year capital program
• Preparation of action strategies for GO enhancements beyond 10 years, and a
range of specific elements of the Plan
• Extension and improvement of the freeway traffic management system by
province
21
670
Beyond 2001
• long term land use/infrastructure
co-ordination
• transportation centres
• transit operators sharing/collaboration
• co-ordination/extension of traffic
management systems
• demand management program
• rail corridor rationalization
• co-ordinated capital program
• Based on work completed in 2000 and 2001, actions over the next few years
include the preparation of implementation strategies for remaining elements
of the Plan and development of a long-term co-ordinated capital program
based on agreed upon priorities.
22
671
i
i
I
Consultation
i
i
• Broad circulation and web site access:
wwvv.gtsb.on.ca
• Collaboration with municipalities _
• GTSB hearings in April
-- I
• Comments by May 15
• GTSB consideration in June
-
• This Plan is proposed as a starting point for public dialogue on the future
transportation system in the GTA and Hamilton-Wentworth.
• Consultation is vital to building consensus around the Plan and the need for a
transportation investment partnership to enable implementation.
• At its February 4 and March 3 meetings the Greater Toronto Services Board
agreed to circulate the Plan and recommended actions for implementing the
Plan widely for comments from municipalities and stakeholders, and directed
staff to report back to the GTSB Transportation Committee at the end of May
on the comments received.
• The Plan being widely circulated and has been posted to the GTSB web site
at www.gtsb.on.ca.
• Public consultation on the Plan is being undertaken in collaboration with
GTSB member municipalities, who are consulting with local stakeholders as
appropriate.
• The GTSB Transportation Committee will be scheduling dates in mid-April
to hear from individuals and organizations who wish to make a deputation on
the Plan. Information on those hearings will be posted to the GTSB web site.
Those who wish to register for a deputation should contact the GTSB directly
at 416-338-2989 or toll free at 1-877-335- )3 19.
• Written comments to the GTSB are due no later than May 15, following
which the GTSB, through its Transportation Committee, will consider the
results of the public consultation and recommendations for revisions to the
Plan.
23
672
a 'f NIP
t
Greater Toronto Services Board
• A key step will be Board adoption of a revised strategic transportation plan
as its first infrastructure strategy under the GTSB legislation, based on this
document and the input gained from member municipalities and through the
consultation process. The first opportunity for the Board to consider adoption
of the strategy will be in June.
24
67
N
w A- 1 Appendix A
2
v GTSB Strategic Transportation Plan - Recommended Actions for Implementation
Q The following table sets o t forty recommended actions, organized according to the sections of"Removing Roadblocks," the draft
GTSB Strategic Transportation Plan for the Greater Toronto Area and Hamilton-Wentworth. For each action, the table indicates the
partners who would be involved in implementation, the recommended time frame for completion, an explanation of the purpose of the
action and, for those actions recommended in the year 2000, funds required and part of the staff recommended budget request for
Transportation Committe initiatives. Actions already approved by the GTSB or the subject of a separate GTSB decision-making
process already underway e.g., consideration of the GO Transit 10-year capital plan) are noted.
Plan Recommended Actions Implementin Timing Explanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
Foreward 1. Engage t ie provincial and federal governments in a GTSB and 2000 will link implementation of the Included in
Transporta ion Investment Partnership through member plan to the need for $50,000 budget
continuatio of a collaborative effort with member municipalities transportation investment request for
municipalities, key private sector and community with key partnerships to ensure long transportation
Q�
stakeholders, the Federation of Canadian stakeholders, term, sustainable investment in funding
strategy
�l Municipali ies and other large urban regions in FCM, other the transportation network in
Canada. Canadian city- the GTA and H-W.
regions,
provincial and
federal
governments
2. Prepare a program of transportation projects of GTSB and 2000 provides a co-ordinated GTA- Included in
inter-regional benefit in the Greater Toronto Area cnetnber wide perspective to incorporate $50,000 budget
and Hamilton-Wentworth to be communicated to all municipalities into municipal priorities for request for
GTSB mem ber municipalities for consideration in federal and provincial transportation
funding
preparing their submissions for the anticipated infrastructure funds
strategy
federal-pro incial-municipal infrastructure program.
I
I
I
I
A - 2 Appendix A
I
Plan Recommeinded Actions Implemen'tin Timing ENplanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
3. Prepare submission for the anticipated federal- GTSB, GO 2000 ensures that GO Transit Included in
provincial-municipal infrastructure program, Transit system improvements are $50,000 budget
comprisin GO Transit system improvements, based considered for provincial and request for
on the GO Transit 10-year capital plan and including federal funding under the transportation
Union Station as the first priority. infrastructure program and funding
provides a vehicle for strategy
highlighting the provincial and
federal interests in the
exTansion and improvement of
Union Station and the GO
system
Introduction 4. Prepare o GTA-wide strategy to co-ordinate long GTSB in 2002- will support implementation of
term planning and phasing of land use, transportation cooperation 2004 municipal plans and provide a
and infrastructure. with member GTA-wide platform for future
municipalities plans, helping to minimize
growth in transportation needs
01\ and support the transit
network with higher density
development in key locations
Transit Is Fundamental
Enhancing 5. Adopt th GO Transit 10-year plan as the basis for GTSB 2000 to provide for improvements
GO Rail capital investments (to be considered by Finance & in GO services and to allow for
Services Administration Committee on March 31 and April the preparation of development
28, 2000). charges by-laws for GO
Transit services
r
A- 3 Appendix A
Plan Recommended Actions Implementin Timing Explanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
6. Identify priorities, allocate funding, begin property GO Transit 2001 + to implement the plan's
acquisition and commence construction of elements priority of enhancing service on
in the GO Transit 10-year plan on an incremental existing GO Rail lines
basis as warranted by ridership and GTA
transportation network objectives.
7. Co-ordinate the preparation of development Regional 2000 to minimize duplication of
charges by-laws for GO Transit services. municipalities, costs and ensure a strong and
City of consistent basis for all
Toronto and development charges by-laws
GO Transit for GO Transit services
8. Identify options for new GO bus services in key GO Transit 2000 to grow transit ridership in key
corridors o er the next 10 years. corridors where higher order
i
transit is planned
9. Prepare a long term GO rail and bus service GO Transit 2001 will provide the basis for
01\ phasing strategy (i.e., beyond 10 years), including corridor and site protection and
v priorities and phasing for: long term context for shorter
0_1 - enlianceinent of peak services, two-way and all-day term infrastructure and service
services, in luding interim use of buses; decisions
- new statioris, station relocations and improvements
to existing s ations, including inter-modal
connections, bus access and commuter parking;
- bus services connecting smaller urban centres to
GO rail stat ons and other parts of the GTA transit
network
- additional trains and buses;
- expanded r new maintenance facilities; and
- corridors and lands to be protected, including for
potential stations on potential lines.
i
A - 4 Appendix A
Plan Recommended Actions Implementin Timing Explanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
Union Station 10. Approve the purchase of Union Station involving GTSB, GO 2000 required to implement
GO Transit (approved by GTSB Feb. 4, 2000). Transit and enhanced GO services and
City of Union Station's role as the
Toronto GTA's multi-modal
transportation hub
11. Direct GO Transit to prepare a detailed plan, GO Transit in 2000 to provide the most cost-
design and phasing strategy for Union Station collaboration effective means of
improvements to maximize opportunities for GO with the City accommodating GO service
service, inc tiding: of Toronto and and the basis for approaching
- expanded tracks and platforms; TTC provincial and federal
- enhanced pedestrian connections; and governments for funding
- development of the bus terminal.
GTA Transit 12. Request GTSB member municipalities to protect GTSB and 2000 .+ to ensure coordinated planning
Corridors GTA transi L corridors through official plans as they member for GTA-wide transit services
are reviewed. municipalities and protection of GTA-wide
transit needs
V
A- 5 Appendix A
i
Plan Recomme ded Actions Implementin Timing Explanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
13. Design nd undertake a transit corridor priorities GTSB with 2000 and to move forward from the $75,000
and phasinE strategy, including: mernber 2001 strategic transportation plan to budget
-compilation/review of existing corridor analyses; municipalities a capital works program and to request for
- staged implementation of a specific set of transit and GO maximize the benefits relative study design
improveme is over a specific time period; Transit to costs of new investments in and $200,000
- a transpor ation demand/supply analysis for each GTA transit services and to prepare
radial corridor served by existing or potential GO infrastructure strategy
Transit services, plus GTA Transit Corridors, (subject to
including connections to Pearson airport; approval of
- for each priority corridor, identification of phasing study
for service evolution, transit and infrastructure design)
required to upport corridor service and staging, key
station elements, and connectivity and feeder service
requirernen s.
'
-establishment of GTA-wide priorities for
implementation, property protection and costing
T -meeting first phase environmental assessment
requiremen s.
GTA 14. Prepare i strategy for GTA transportation centres GTSB, 2002- to support incremental
Transportatio where different transit services inter-connect, member 2004 development of the GTA
n Centres including: identification of priority centres; services municipalities, transit network as a fast,
to he provid d to transit riders; actions to ensure GO Transit convenient, integrated system
priority access for feeder buses; and actions to and transit and to take maximum
integrate those transportation centres located in operators advantage of phased
designated urban development centres with improvements to the GTA
surrounding,land uses and to support pedestrian transit network
access and planned development.
A- 6 Appendix A
Plan Recommended Actions Implemeniin Timing Explanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
15. Prepare a GTA gateways plan, including property GTSB, 2001 to identify priorities for
protection .nd a phased implementation strategy member minimizing traffic volumes on
coordinatec with improvements to GO Transit municipalities, key expressway corridors by
services and other transit services and meeting the GO Transit providing opportunities for
requirements of the Environmental Assessment Act and Province transit use for parts of longer
(MTO) distance trips
GO Bus See #6 and #7 above.
Services
Transit 16. Prepare a comprehensive strategy to enhance bus GTSB, 2001 to address the critical link
Priority feeder services into the network of GO rail, rapid member between local transit systems
Routes transit and GTA transit corridor services, addressing municipalities, and the GTA-wide transit
targets for service levels, options for priority GO transit and network, including GO Transit
signalizatio reserved lanes and other transit priority transit services
measures; the investment required for additional operators
equipment and operational improvements, station
O�\ improvements and other measures necessary to
�! improve the connection between various transit
services.
17. Prepare a strategy for phased establishment of a GTSB, 2001 to coordinate efforts to
network of priority transit routes and HOV lanes on member improve the speed and
key expressways and arterial roads, focussed on municipalities, convenience of transit
enhanced connections with important origins and GO Transit, movements across boundaries
destinations supporting the GTA transit network transit
and official plans and based on analyses of congestion operators and
points, costs and benefits. Province
(MTO)
Connections See #13 above.
to Pearson
Airport
A- 7 Appendix A
Plan Recommended Actions Implementin Timing Explanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
Integrated See #13 above.
Planning and
Staging
Co-ordinated Transit
I
A Fast and 18. Adopt a GTA-wide transit service co-ordination GTSB, 2000 to provide a consistent Included in
Convenient protocol, l ed on the strategic plan, as a shared member framework for translation of $50,000
Choice of framework for co-ordination of services. municipalities, GTA-wide transit objectives to budget
Travel GO Transit each municipality and operator request for
and transit transit co-
operators ordination
Co-ordinated 19. Set prio lities for enhanced GTA transit service GTSB, 2001 to guide efforts over the next 2
Transit in the co-ordination across municipal boundaries, including member to 5 years to improve
GTA and proposed phasing, costing and revenue sharing municipalities,
H-W arrangements to maintain revenue neutrality for GO Transit
operators onj implementation. and transit
Co operators
O
20. Identify and implement opportunities for transit GO Transit 2002- to maximize efficiencies in the
operators to share operational information in real and transit 2004 provision of GTA cross-
time, share (I-quipment and collaborate on purchasing, operators boundary services
maintenanc ;and training needs.
21. Prepare strategy to improve coordination of GTSB, 2001 to enkiance the mobility of
Specialized transit and other transportation services, member, �seni'or citizens and people with
based on anaylysis of the demand, opportunities and municipalities disa;bi'liti�s across the GTA and
barriers to s rving GTA cross-boundary trips. and specialized Hamilton-Wentworth
transit
operators
A- 8 Appendix A
Plan Recommended Actions Implementin Timing Explanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
Integrated 22. Prepare'ia strategy to incrementally improve the GTSB, 2001 to improve the convenience of
Transit Fares integration of transit fares and fare media member using the GTA transit network
i
municipalities,
GO Transit
and transit
operators
Integrated 23. Update and build on the conclusions of the GTSB, 2000 to maximize opportunities for Included in
Customer Transit Int gration Steering Committee on the member transit riders to make best use $50,000
Information regional Ride Guide, coordinated telephone municipalities, of existing co-ordinated budget
information'and interregional signage, including: GO Transit services and enhancements to request for
- recomme 'dations on key issues like ongoing and transit service co-ordination as they transit co-
project fun ing, technology, private sector operators are implemented ordination
participatto and formal arrangements for the
ownership irid sharing of assets and the operation
and ongoin maintenance of the data base-,
developzn nt of a geographic data base for providing
co coordinate transit customer information and trip
planning; acid
- alternative means of accessing this information,
including the internet and kiosks in public venues.
I
Intermodal 24. Prepare a strategy for the location and sizing of GTSB, 2001 to ensure that commuter lots
Integration commuter arking lots to support the phased member are used to build transit
implementation of the GTA transit network and municipalities, ridership, especially in priority
including expansion of commuter lots along existing GO Transit, GTA transit corridors, to
and new e !'ressways, including Highway 407. transit ensure that they support
operators and efforts to improve feeder bus
the Province services, and to implement
(MTO) ridesharing and carpooling
programs
�i
A - 9 Appendix A
Plan Recomm nded Actions Implementin Timing Explanation Funding
reference �� g Partners (Year)
Planning and 25. Investigate, as part of the review of the GTSB GTSB in 2000 to provide the tools needed to
Delivery of required :der the Greater Toronto Services Board consultation effectively co-ordinate inter-
Higher Order Act, reviss in the GTSB's mandate to provide with member regional transit across the GTA
Transit clear responsibility for planning and co-ordination of municipalities and H-W
inter-regional transit services, including the and transit
distribution of funding, costs and revenues to operators
operators r�Oted to inter-regional cross-boundary
services. (for consideration by Strategic Planning&
Review Co iunittee as part of the review of the
GTSB)
I
I
O�
Co
I
i
I
I
i
i
i
i
1 I
I
I 1
I
A - 10 Appendix A
Plan Recomm nl ded Actions Implementin Timing Explanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
The Movement of Goods nd Services
A Strategic 26. Preparj a multi-modal analysis of goods and GTSB and 2000 and to provide information needed $100,000
Goods services m¢wernents and trade corridors in the GTA member 20011+ to establish strategic priorities included in
Movement and Hamilton-Wentworth, including: municipalities for planning, policy budget
Network - a comprehensive review of how the provincial in collaboration development and investment in request
expresswayand municipal arterial road networks with the transportation infrastructure to
function to'ether and with other modes to serve the Province facilitate the efficient and
movement of goods and services; (MTO), timely movement of goods and
- detailed f eight data and analyses of patterns and federal services
trends in facility location, origin and destination truck government,
rnovernent� trip generation rates, travel times, the Data
sizes of trucks and cargo types; Management
- the emerging role of intermodal facilities; Group and
- characteristics and implications of aggregate haulage; industry
- issues andbarriers to goods and services
movement
w - impacts oti trade routes and border crossings;
- development of a commodity flows model to allow
for ongoin goods movement analysis;
- consolidation and mapping of traffic cordon counts
across the ('TA and H-W; and
- analysis oti that sector of the service industry which
is dependarllt on road travel, eg. courier, inter-city
buses, local delivery and maintenance services,
including a; industry survey to establish the scale and
issues affec ling this sector.
I
I
i
�i'
i
A - 11 Appendix A
Plan Recomm nded Actions Implementin Timing Explanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
27. Develop a plan to enhance specific elements of Province 2001 to address existing and
the goods r povement network, including expansion (MTO), anticipated future barriers to
or extensio of highways and arterial roads and federal the efficient movement of
improved connections to freight and inter-modal government in goods and services
terminals, I Iused on the comprehensive review of the collaboration
movement of goods and services. with the
GTSB,
I member
municipalities
and the
industry
28. Develo f a short term plan to identify and address Province 2000 to address existing major
the most cr�tical expressway congestion points (MTO) in congestion points affecting
affecting G A and H-W movements of goods and consultation goods movement GTA-wide
services. with GTSB and trade corridor connections
Cr\ and member to border crossings
CO
municipalities
Optimizing Existing Asses
Asset 29. Develo pI an assessment framework for GTSB, 2001 to facilitate the preparation of
Management transportation infrastructure proposals which member asset management plans to
includes life cycle cost estimates, including municipalities minimize costs and disruptions
operational, maintenance and rehabilitation costs. and Province 'due Kb repair and maintenance
(MTO),
Traffic 30. Extend and improve the freeway traffic Province 2001+ to quickly help to address
Management management system to all GTA and Hamilton- (MTO) and existing congestion points on
Wentworth C xT)ressways, including Highway 407 and Highway 407 the expressway system
at key point on all trade corridors to U.S. border ETR Corp.
crossings,with first priority to the QEW and
Highway 4911 west corridors.
A- 12 Appendix A
i
Plan Recomm nded Actions Implementin Timing Explanation Funding
reference 7 g Partners (Year)
31. Co-ord iinate the freeway traffic management City of 2002- to maximize the GTA-wide
systems op,I'lrated by the City of Toronto (Gardiner Toronto and 2004 traffic management benefits of
Expresswa land Don Valley Parkway) and the Province both systems while minimizing
Ministry o {Transportation (400 series highways and (MTO) costs
QEW).
32. Investi ate the possibility of extending the GTSB, 2002- to maximize the GTA-wide
freeway tra 1'fic management system to key parts of member 2004 traffic management benefits of
the arterial 'oad system which connect and provide municipalities the system
alternate ro tes to freeways in highly congested and Province
corridors. (MTO)
33. Prepare a GTA-wide incident management GTSB, 2001 to minimize the impact of
strategy co prdinating the actions of the various member incidents on the efficient flow
jurisdictions and agencies who respond to provide municipalities, of people and goods
procedures and equipment to quickly clear accidents emergency
and spills, provide real time information to the media services,
Cr- 1
and the public, and directing travellers to appropriate Province
alternative �outes. (MTO)
Transportatio 34. Develolj a comprehensive GTA-wide GTSB, 2002- to make maximum use of
n Demand transportation demand management program to member 2004 investments in the existing
Management include tel commuting, flexible work hours, municipalities, transportation network by
employer- inded transit passes and subsidies, transportation reducing the growth in
ridesharingprograms, parking policies and pricing agencies, automobile traffic, particularly
strategies. Province during peak periods
(MTO),
community
and private
sector
s
organizations
35. See #2 above.
i
A- 13 Appendix A
Plan Recommended Actions Implementin Timing .Explanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
Phased Implementation
i
Protection of 35. Prepare la U A-wide transportation corridor and GTSB, 2001 to protect the opportunities to
Future site protection strategy to identify and recommend member implement the GTA
Corridors and means of p:otecting: corridors required for municipalities, transportation plan
Sites enhancement, expansion or extension of the GTA transportation
transportation network; sites for transit stations, agencies and
including parking I and bus access facilities; and access Province
to and frotrii airports, ports, truck terminals, rail (MTO)
yards and i l Iter-modal facilities, and providing the
basis for technical feasibility studies meeting the
requireme l�s for Environmental Assessment
approvals.
i
Freight Rail 36. Investig ate opportunities to rationalize the use of GTSB, GO 2002- to ensure that the public sector
Rationalizatio existing rail corridors. Transit and 2004 is prepared to seize
cl member opportunities to enhance
�. municipalities transit that may emerge from
co changing market conditions
affecting the railways
Service 37. Prepare�n overall phased implementation GTSB, GO 2005 + to consolidate the results of all
Implementatio strategy for "he GTA transportation network based Transit, detailed work into a clear
n on the anal ses completed for each element of the member program of infrastructure
system, incl i ding a co-ordinated GTA-wide long municipalities investments
term capital'Program for elements of the GTA and Province
network identifying costs, funding sources and (MTO)
approvals neiedcd.
I
I
A - 14 Appendix A
Plan Recomm I ded Actions Implementin Timing Explanation Funding
reference g Partners (Year)
Consultatio 38. Receiv� the draft GTA Strategic Transportation GTSB in 2000 to gain public input on the Plan
n Plan and cii-culate it to all member municipalities and collaboration, and possible revisions prior to
other stake olders for comments by May 15th, 2000 with member adoption as a GTSB strategy
and report ack to Transportation Committee at municipalities under the Greater Toronto
their May 16`h, 2000 meeting (approved by the GTSB Services Board Act
on Februa j 4`I', 2000,with comments requested by
April 3, 20i 0).
Guiding 39. EndorsLI and adopt the GTA transportation vision GTSB and 2000 to provide a consistent basis for
Principles, and objects ies. member planning and transportation
Vision and municipalities decisions affecting the GTA-
Objectives wide network
40. Request the provincial and federal governments Province 2000 to ensure all environmental
to harinonil�i e the provincial and federal processes for (MOE) and considerations are evaluated
environmental assessment approval for infrastructure Federal together and to avoid
and condua� them simultaneously. Government unnecessary delays in approval
011 (Environment processes
co Canada)
I
I
I
I
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date: Monday, May 1, 2000
Res. #
Report #: CD-18-00 By-law #-
ANIMAL SERVICES MONTHLY REPORT
Subject: FOR MONTH OF MARCH, 2000
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
- recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report CD-18-00 be received for information; and -
2. THAT a copy of Report CD-18-00 be forwarded to the Animal Alliance of Canada and
the Animal Advisory Committee.
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 For the information of Council, the table attached to Report CD-18-00 summarizes the
activities and revenues pertaining to Animal Services for the month of March, 2000.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
i
Patti arrie A.M.C.T. Franklin Wu M.C.I.P. R.P.P., -
-- -- — ---
_- --
_ nicipai erk Chief Administrative Officer
MPKS*PLB*dm
Animal Alliance of Canada Animal Advisory Committee
221 Broadview Avenue
Suite 101
Toronto, Ontario
M4M 2G3
7 ,,0 1
CLERKS DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENTNO. 1
ANIMAL SERVICES DIVISION TO REPORT NO. CD-18-00
ANIMAL SERVICES MONTHLY REPORT
MARCH 2000
A.ACTIVITIES THIS MONTH YR.TO DATE 2000 YR.TO DATE 99
PICKED UP-WILDLIFE 7 20 24
CATS DOGS CATS DOGS CATS
PICKED UP 17 4 49 17 44 27
BROUGHT IN 15 22 39 60 46 31
13 3 44 3 40 3
SOLD TO RESIDENTS 18 19 37 63 43 32
SOLD TO RESEARCH 0 0 0 0 0 0
EUTHANISED 0 1 0 3 2 5
DEAD ON ARRIVAL 1 3 7 8 5 18
::QUARANTINE 0 1 0 1 2 0
WRITTEN WARNINGS 25 39 48
P.O.A. TICKETS 0 3 7
CONVICTIONS 1 6 4
CALL-OUTS AFTER HOURS 4 10 13
OVER TIME HOURS 32 50 39
B. REVENUES
DOGS &CATS RELEASED 120.00 0 210.00 90.00 291.04 62.06
LICENSES 6328.00 2633.00 13341.00 4331.00 8883.64 0
SOLD TO RESEARCH 0 0 0 0 0 0
SOLD TO RESIDENTS 900.00 675.00 2164.75 1961.80 2395.75 933.40
DOGS REDEEMED 670.00 60.00 1608.00 60.00 1469.00 0
SUB TOTAL--- --_801,8.00---3368.00----1732-3:7-5 644 80 -l3039A3 995:4 ]--
TRAP REVENUE 3.00 42.00 45.39
TOTAL REVENUE 11389.00 23808.55 14080.28
EUTHANISED 1 SICK CAT
7 2
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date: Monday, May 1, 2000 Res. #
Report #: CD-19-00 By-law #
Subject: PARKING ENFORCEMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2000
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend to
Council the following:
1. THAT Report CD-19-00 be received for information; and
2. THAT a copy of Report CD-19-00 be forwarded to the Bowmanville Business Centre for their
information.
The following pertinent statistical information relates to Parking Enforcement activities for the month of
March 2000 and is provided herein for the information of Committee and Council.
TICKETS THIS MONTH Y/T/D 2000 Y/T/D 1999 Y/T/D/1998
ISSUED
By Parking En£ 865 2093 765 1441
Officers
By Police 65 146 69 28
By P.Works 0 42 102 76
By Sec.Officers 18 57 46 11
REVENUE
From Meters $6,543.00 $15,966.00 $10,740.45 $20,574.78
From Permits 0 0 100.00 750.00
Fines 9,041.00 24,035.00 8,430.00 12,171.00
MTO 684.75 13,695.00 N/A N/A
ebac
TOTAL $14, 899.25 $26,306.00 $19,270.45 $33,495.78
REVENUE
Respect lly submi ed, Reviewed by,
-1)
Patti L arrie M.C.T. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P.
icipa erk Chief Administrative Officer
PB/LC/JM/bm
7 n 3
i
C PO?2-00
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
I
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File
Date: Monday, April 3, 2000 Res.
Report #: PD-032-00 File #: PLN 28.5 By-law#
_-- - Subject: GREATER TORONTO AREA - AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC IMPACT
STUDY - FILE: PLN 28.5
j Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
I
1. THAT Report PD-032-00 be received; and
2. THAT a copy of Report PD-032-00 be forwarded to the Durham Region Federation of
Agriculture and to the Greater Toronto Area Federations of Agriculture Project
Management Committee.
i
1. PURPOSE
1.1 The "Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Economic Impact Study" was commissioned by
the Greater Toronto Area Federations of Agriculture. The purpose of the study was to
"identify the benefits that agriculture provides to the urban populations of the Greater
Toronto Area (__ ___)._aud®the._ci-scum tances -ir-ed-to-e-r- u-e-that-a rieulture-has-t --
opportunity to continue to exist in the GTA".
The two main objectives of the Study are to measure the economic benefit of agriculture
in the GTA and to share these findings with government agencies enabling these agencies
to make more informed decisions on issues that may impact agriculture.
REPORT PD-032-00 PAGE 2
1.2 The Federation of Agriculture will be making a presentation to Committee on April 3,
2000. The purpose of this report is to highlight some of the main findings of the GTA
Agricultural Economic Impact Study emphasizing agricultural activities in Clarington. A
copy of the complete report has been provided to the Committee by the Clerk.
1.3 On February 4, 2000, the GTSB adopted the eight recommendations of the Greater
i
_ Toronto Area Agricultural Economic Impact Study and will include consideration of the —
agricultural industry as an important component of GTSB strategies: - The eight
recommendations can be referred to in Attachment #1 - to this- report. The
recommendations are not specifically addressed in this report but will be reviewed during
the presentation.
- I
2. FINDINGS
The report provides a profile of the agriculture industry within the GTA. Information
such as number of farms, types of farms and amount of acres of cropland are provided.
In addition, the report also provides economic information such as farm revenue and farm
receipts. The economic impacts of agriculture are discussed and the advantages in
retaining an agricultural tax base are identified. The social, cultural and environmental
impacts of agriculture are also discussed in this study. Some of the main findings are
reviewed below.
2.1 Agriculture in the GTA Context
In 1996 there were 529 farms in Clarington representing 11.5% of the farms within the
GTA. Clarington's share of the percentage of acres farmed within the GTA is also
significant. The number of acres farmed in Clarington (85,985 acres) is second only to
- — acres _ wi m t e ese numbers signify the importance of
Clarington's agricultural industry within the GTA.
i
Percentage of Farmed Land in GTA Percentage of Farms within the GTA
Clarington claringion
11.3% s%
e
Remaining
Municipalities Other and
8% 31 8%
55.7% Durham
33.0%
- 1302
i;',J P012-00
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
i
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date: Monday, April 3, 2000 Res. #
Report #: PD-032-00 File #: PLN 28.5 By-law #
-- - Subject: GREATER TORONTO AREA - AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC IMPACT
STUDY - FILE: PLN 28.5
j Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1 1. THAT Report PD-032-00 be received; and
2. THAT a copy of Report PD-032-00 be forwarded to the Durham Region Federation of
Agriculture and to the Greater Toronto Area Federations of Agriculture Project
� Management Committee.
i
1. PURPOSE
1.1 The "Greater Toronto Area Agricultural Economic Impact Study" was commissioned by
the Greater Toronto Area Federations of Agriculture. The purpose of the study was to
"identify the benefits that agriculture provides to the urban populations of the Greater
Toronto Area (GTA) and the circumstances required to ensure that agriculture has the
opportunity to continue to exist in the GTA".
The two main objectives of the Study are to measure the economic benefit of agriculture
in the GTA and to share these findings with government agencies enabling these agencies
to make more informed decisions on issues that may impact agriculture.
13 51
REPORT PD-032-00 PAGE 6
is comparable to the increase across the entire GTA where the average farm size was 164
acres in 1996. The increase in farm size is a common trend found occurring throughout
Southern Ontario. The average farm size in Ontario is now 206 acres.
2.5.3 In 1976, Clarington had 93,335 acres of farmland. In 1996, the amount of farmland fell
by 7,381 acres to 85,985 acres. This is a decline of 8%. During this same time, there was
a decline of 13% in the amount of farmland within Durham Region. Of-the lake front -
municipalities within Durham Region, Clarington experienced the least amount of change
in the loss of farm acres,
CHANGE IN FARMLAND ACRES IN DURHAM REGION (1976-1996)
% Rate of Change
1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 (1976-1996)
Ajax 11,590 7,734 8,446 5,332 6,897 -40
Brock 76,824 72,719 73,673 67,218 72,505 -06
Clarington 93,335 88,844 87,728 90,256 85,985 -08
Oshawa 15,459 15,594 15,718 11,393 13,290 -14
Pickering 25,578 25,241 21,874 18,131 18,116 -29
Scugog 78,236 84,046 76,575 71,997 68,879 -12
Uxbridge 59,829 57,681 55,622 54,161 56,789 -05
Whitby 24,364 21,752 18,532 18,734 14,396 -41
DURHAM 385,215 373,611 358,168 337,222 336,857 -13
Source: Statistics Canada,Census of Agriculture, 1976, 1981, 1986, 1991, 1996
2.5.4 Farm ownership is much higher in Durham Then the rest of the GTA. In Durham 63%
was owned, compared to 44% in York, 48% in Peel and 45% in Halton. This would
indicate a stronger agricultural base less dependent on lands owned by speculators,
government, retired farms or non-farmers. It is comparable to the provincial average of
7 1 c,u named
2.5.4 Agriculture jobs in the GTA and Durham Region are declining. Between 1991 and 1996
the GTA experienced a loss of 15% and Durham Region experienced a loss of 7%.
Clarington and Scugog, to the contrary, experienced an increase in the number of
agricultural jobs.
1306
REPORT PD-032-00 PAGE 7
AGRICULTURAL JOBS BY MUNICIPALITY
RATE OF CHANGE 1991 AND 1996
MUNICIPALITY 1991 1996 % Rate of Change
Ajax 240 200 -20
Brock S25 430 -22
Clarington 975 995 2
_ Oshawa 500 430 -16
Pickering 325 275 -1-8
- S-cugog 800 850 6
Uxbridge 635 S20 -22
Whitby 410 405 -1
DURHAM 4,415 4,120 -7
3• MUNICIPAL OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
3.1 The Clarington Official Plan recognizes that the agricultural industry is a very important
part of the Municipality's economic base. It is the goal of the Official Plan to encourage
and support the agricultural industry. The objectives of the Official Plan include
preserving high quality agricultural lands for farming purposes, to promote stewardship
of agricultural lands for future generations and to direct non-farm uses to settlement
areas.
3.2 Clarington's Official Plan has stringent policies with respect to the protection of
agricultural land. Only development directly related to an agricultural activity shall be
pennitted without amendment to the Official Plan. The creation of new lots within the
agricultural area is discouraged with the exception of severances for retiring farmers and
new 40ha (I 00ac) fann parcels. The purpose of restricting lot creation and other forms of
development in the agricultural areas is to preserve the existing agricultural areas and to
ensure that further deterioration of the agricultural land base does not occur.
3.3 Clarington's Official Plan policies recognize the farming may not be the sole occupation
of fanners, and thus provides for home occupation uses and home industry uses. It also
permits fann-related industrial/commercial uses to service the farming community.
1307
REPORT PD-032-00 PAGE S
4. SUMMARY
4.1 Farming in Clarington represents a significant component of the agricultural industry in
Durham Region and within the GTA. This is reflected not only in the total number of
farms and the number of acres farmed, but also in the gross receipts produced by farms in
Clarington. These numbers are indicative of the fact that the agricultural industry in
Clarington is thriving. Clarington's proximity to a market of 120 million people and the
high quality soils which are found in Clarington are reasons often -given for the
outstanding performance of Clarington farms.
4.2 Over the years, farming in Southern Ontario has been eroded by urban sprawl and
policies that did not support the complete protection of agricultural land. In recent years,
the protection of agricultural land has been an important issue and has been given the
consideration it is due.
I
4.3 Clarington shares a strong community of interest with Scugog, Uxbridge and Brock in
providing the municipal environment to support farmers and the broader agricultural
community.
I
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by,
Davi . Crome, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.
Director of Planning Development Chief Administrative Officer
HB*BN*DJC*cd
March 23, 2000
it
Attachment#1 - GTA Federation of Agriculture Recommendations
1 3P8
ATTACHMENT NO 1
GREATER TORONTO AREA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Land use policies governing the use of agricultural land should be
consistent across the GTA and should reflect the need to protect large
contiguous areas from conflicting land uses and to prevent the further
fragmentation of the agricultural land base.
2. Long range planning for the extension of roads and services must be
done with the understanding that where there are services, there is
pressure for development. Planning for urban services should be done
comprehensively to avoid pressure on prime agricultural areas.
3. This study introduced the concept that the agricultural industry is a
critical mass or cluster that sustains itself. If components of the cluster
disappear, the cluster as a whole will be weakened. Additional research
to identify the critical mass and essential elements required by various
sectors of the industry would be useful to support planning for the
industry.
I
4. An input-output analysis was conducted as part of this project, the
results are contained in this report. However, there are limitations with
this approach that are caused by the lack of specific data on a regional
basis. Given the importance of the GTA economy, it would be
appropriate to develop and-maintain input-output tales for the GTA
economy.
5. The issue of the taxes paid versus the services used is one which has not
been specifically studied in the GTA. Comprehensive studies focusing
on this issue would add helpful insight to the long term cost versus
return of different types of development.
6. Agriculture is a rapidly evolving industry being updated by
technological advance. All parties involved in the future of agriculture,
from the farm operators to the politicians, should be kept abreast of the
essential requirements of the industry to keep pace with these changes.
_7. Agriculture in the GTA is a diverse, sophisticated industry that provides
a wide variety of products. Marketing of this industry is key to its
success. Given its nature, there are sectors, which are not marketed
eff
responding to international trends. Programs to address these should
be expanded and developed.
8. Although there are excellent educational programs for farmers, there is
a need for hands on, co-operative programs to train and update farm
employees. Efforts should be made to respond to this need, potentially
through expanded skills, training, and apprenticeship programs
designed to enhance innovation and entrepreneurship.
1-309
0MUNICIPALITY OF
.1arington
ONTARIO
II
i
i
i
SPECIAL GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
DATE: APRIL 17, 2000
TIME: 1:00 p.m. -
PLACE: COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. ROLL CALL
2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
3. REPORT
(a) TR-14-00 - 2000 Current Budget
Presentation - Representative of Clarington Library Board
4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
5. OTHER BUSINESS
6. ADJOURNMENT
I
i
l
I
CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
40 TEMPERANCE STREET • BOWMANVILLE - ONTARIO • LIC 3A6 • (905) 623-3379 • FAX 623-4169
WESSITE: www.municipality.clarinoton.on ra RECYCLED PAPER
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: SPECIAL GENERAL PURPOSE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
Date: April 17, 2000
Report#: TR-14-00
2000 CURRENT BUDGET
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee
recommend to Council the following:
1. THAT Report TR-14-00 be received for information;
2. THAT the 2000 Current Budget which includes the Executive Summary and
external budgets, be approved, with the non-controllable and Priority #1 items
identified on Attachment#1, with an overall impact of 0%;
3. THAT Council receive items identified as Priority#2 (Library), on Attachment#1 for
information;
4. THAT the appropriate By-Laws to levy the 2000 tax rates for Municipal, Region
and Education purposes be recommended to Council for approval;
5. THAT Council authorize the Following recommendations for the Clarington Older
Adults Association and the Beech Centre;
a) The funding for the approved Capital Project — Elevator at the Beech Centre
from the principal portion of the Older Adults Capital Reserve Fund;
b) The $40,000 for Clarington Beech Centre included prior to finalization of the
Capital Budget requests, on page 28 of the Capital Budget, be redirected to the
Municipal operating budget, to assist in the zero percent impact;
c) The Older Adults additional capital and operating requests per Attachment #2
in the amount of $47,000 be approved (reduced by any Trillium Funding or
other Provincial grants received applicable to these requests) from the interest
portion of the Older Adults Capital Reserve Fund;
6. THAT any funds remaining in the Ontario Senior Games Reserve be available for
use on promotional banners, etc., for the upcoming games;
7. THAT Clarington Library Board, Clarington Older Adults — Beech Centre, Visual
Arts Centre and Museums be advised of Council's actions; and
8. THAT the Garbage Reserve be consolidated with the Rate Stabilization/Working
Funds Reserve.
ff ;
l
TR-14-00 Page 2
Background and Comments:
1.0 Capital Budget
1.1 The 2000 Capital Budget was approved by Council through Report TR-8-00 on February
28, 2000. This allowed the Municipality to tender required construction contracts and
proceed with other capital projects while the current budget was awaiting finalization
information.
1.2 The grant requests were also dealt with separately through Report CS-04-00 on March 20,
2000.
2.0 Current Budget
2.1 Impact
The operating/current budget is presented to Council with an overall impact of 0%
excluding rounding.
2.2 Non-Controllable and Priority#1 Items
The current budget reflects those items classified on Attachment #1 as non-controllable
and Priority #1. These items have a municipal tax implication which have been
accommodated through expenditure adjustments and increased sources of revenue such
as the linear property tax assessment revenue.
2.3 The non-controllable impacts result from service levels previously committed to and
include such items as the final full year impact of 24 hour Fire Service in Courtice, the
second year of the Collective Agreement negotiations, the Fire Arbitration Award,
reinstatement of some portion of the transfers to the Reserve Funds, the Board of Trade
funding, municipal election impact, and various other expenses previously committed.
2.4 The Priority #1 items are required to maintain current levels of service. Several of the
items were removed from past budgets in order to maintain the zero percent impact. The
departments, over the past few years have accommodated many adjustments and have
assessed the resources required to effectively maintain the existing levels of service.
2.5 The rural house numbering has been included in the recommended 2000 budget with
funding provided from the Fire Primary Response Reserve Fund.
2.6 There are some items recommended which are new additions to the base, but are
required because of growth, to maintain existing service levels. The Municipality of
Clarington has been coping with the pressures of growth along with the effects of
Provincial downloading over the past few years. The municipality has just received
notice from the Province that a Community Reinvestment Fund grant in the amount of
$116,000 will be made available for the first time in 2000. It has been built into the
bottom line to achieve the zero percent budget presented to Council for approval.
2.7 There is no direction from the Province at this point regarding an "exit strategy" from Bill
79, however Finance is anticipating that there will once again be a significant drain on
time and resources to respond to further legislated tax/assessment changes. There is
TR-14-00 Page 3
an ever increasing demand on corporate support for technology change. This
incorporates application support for many new programs such as GIS (Geographic
Information System), Crysis Fire Software, ESCOM Community Services Registration
Program, Internet, Vailtech, etc. There are 8 remote sites to support and there is a Y21K
requirement to change the financial system for general ledger, accounts
payable/receivable and budgeting financial programs. The 2000 budget incorporates a
partial year budget impact for a Data Base Administrator to assist in this area.
2.8 There are some additional staff recommendations that take existing casual positions to
part time 24-hour recognition, in Fire and Animal Services and take existing part time
position to contract position in Marketing Office. Planning has provided for a contract _
position for the purposes of completion of the zoning by-law, in accordance with-Council's
direction. A mechanic position is reintroduced in the Public Works Department to ensure
our fleet and heavy equipment are properly maintained. In the past, the mechanic
positions have been funded from the Fleet Maintenance Reserve. Due to the elimination
of the Roads Grants, these positions will be gradually transferred to the tax base. The
budget allocation cost to service fleet for the Fire Department and Community Services
have been transferred to the Public Works budget accounts. The recommendations
related to staffing do not increase service levels but assist in maintaining existing levels
due to continuous growth and development.
3.0 Priority#2 Requests -
3.1 The items identified as Priority #2 are requests put forward for Council to consider. They
are generally enhancing service levels or responses to demands experienced by
departments from the effects of growth. In the 2000 budget the only Priority #2 requests
are related to service levels in the Public Library at different branches. In the past many of
the Priority#2 requests have been deferred to future budgets.
4.0 Garbage Rate
4.1 The garbage rate continues to be collected based on a flat rate applied to each collection
stop. The rate is calculated based on tonnage as follows:
2000 1999
Regional Disposal $ 95 $ 83
Municipal Collection 50 50
145 133
The Region's charge has increased based on the increase in the tipping fees from $84 to
$86, plus additional Regional charges and the elimination of subsidy from the reserve.
The garbage rate is based on a Regional Tipping Fee of $86/tonne. Also the municipal
collection contract has increased, in accordance with their contract, by the consumer price
index. In the other area municipalities, garbage is charged on an assessment basis,
thereby making the increase more dramatic for many properties in other areas. In
Clarington the flat rate application ensures that the charges are collected evenly and on
the same basis (tonnage) that they are charged to the municipality. The charge has been
stabilized from year to year with support from the Rate Stabilization Reserve.
TR-14-00 Page 4
5.0 External Agency Budgets
5.1 The Library, Museums, Beech Centre and Visual Arts requests were classified into non-
controllable, Priority#1 and #2 costs. Their detailed submissions are included in the draft
print of the budget, and they have been invited to attend budget deliberations to present
their requests. . The Older Adults Association final requests, both operating and capital,
were received after printing of the draft budget and are shown in Attachment#2 (page 267
Clarington Older Adults section of the draft budget may be eliminated).
6.0 Conclusion
6.1 A few of the numbers in the draft were revised after printing in order to maintain the zero
percent budget and accommodate ongoing changes; they includes such items as
increasing the PIL revenue to match actual 1999 revenue received, etc., and they do not
affect the bottom line.
6.2 The Municipality of Clarington's tax rate has not shown an overall tax increase since 1992.
In 1999 the municipal tax rate was included with the Region and Education rates to show a
net overall impact of 0%. The recommended 2000 municipal budget is presented at 0%.
The Region and Education rates are not available at this time but will be reflected in the
rating by-law which will be forwarded to Council when all information is received.
Respectfull submitted, Reviewed by:
ie A. Marano, H.BSc.,AMCT, Franklin Wu, M.C.I.P.,R.P.P.,
Treasurer. Chief Administrative Officer.
MM/hjl
Attachments
Atari 10 2000 dn:08TWUNE ! 1 Report TR-14-00 Attahoment#1
2000 OPERATING BUDGET
Impact by Department-Major Changes
OPERATING:Additional Expenditures prior year Base: (Expense iReserve !Non-Controllable iPriori #1 lPri ori tit
Item a I Note-numbers are estimates of overall impacts] Contribution Net im act Maintains Service iincreasoe Service
Administration:
1 Negotiations(CUPS/Fire)/Part time Incl.@ 2000 2.6% 361.000
2 Increase Transfer to Building Services Reserve-Building Maintenance/Repairs 10,000'
3 Board of Trade [50 to$75,000 in 2000) 25;000
4 Staff-Confidential Secretary- Mayor 40,000
5 Tounsm/Marketin -Web P re-design&Project approved Adm.10-00 Backyard Festival 80;000:
6 Tourism-Staff one of the t.to -CONTRACT 35,000 1
Clerks:
7 Election expenses 1:67,A00.
8 Animal Services-Staff-casual to part time 24 hours 21,000
9 B-law-additional 21 ae2roved CD-41-99 re POA 8000
Finance&Unclassified Administration:
10 Unclassified-Capital-Playground via transfer to Working Funds Reserve approved via capital budget]30000Q: 1
11 Increase Transfer to Municipal Capital Works R/Fund{fax Component of Dev.Chg.)[reduced prior yrs for p avement) 55 000
12 Increase Transfers to Reserves-sick credit re fire/GIS re mtnc contract/computer replacement 35,Ii00
13 Computer Services-Staff-Data Base Administrator re Increasing Technology Changes[113 year impact) 20,000,
14 Computer Services-hardware maintenance-e ui ment comm off warrant on to mtc./GIS li 48,7751
........ . ... ..
.......... .....
.............. ..
Fire:
15 Fire Service-Courtice full year of 24 hr.service) [estimated impact] 60,000:
16 Staff-Clerical-casual to part time 24 hours 17,000
17 Transfer to Reserve-Fire E ui ment from 15-30 15,000
Public Works:
18 Rural House Numbering Re:FD-2-99 [R/F-Primary Response Reserve Fund] 130,000 (130,000)
19 Public Works-Add Back to Complement-Staff-mechanic re total fleet under P.W 40,000'
20 Snow Clearing-Sidewalks .4Ot100
21 Transfer to Parks Mtnc Reserve Fund -from 25 to 50 25,000'
22 Transfer to Fleet Equipment-impact on tax with Provincial Grant elimination 10Q;000:
23 Street Lights increased demand 50,000
24 Pla round E ui ment a roved throw h ca ital bud et-$460,0001
Communily Services:
25 Youth Grant-approved by Council re J.Howard Society CS-01-00 30,000:
26 Transfer to Reserve Fund from 25-50 25,000,
Plannin
27 Contract -to assist in completion of Zoning by-law-per Council indication 30,000
28 Crossinq Guards 3600.
er-General
29 Library-transfer to reserve for debt &for parking lot future requirements(per Admin -00) $O,g00
30 Estimated Net:Normal Bud eta Increases,Training,Heat, Insurance,Pa Equity,Legal.E 2WO00'
1;675,1900 286,775'
rRevenue:
32 P.I.L./&Rt.of Way Linear Property Tax (1 700000)
Surplus A plied-increase from$1025k to$1,125k 1f0 Building Pennfts/Penal &int.on Taxes/Supplementaries&other general revenue . ... ..Province-Community Reinvestment
Funding Total Revenue Increase Growth-estimated value contributed by rowth -APPLIED ENTIRELY TO CAPITAL appr.2.8% 500,000
MUNICIPAL ONLY-OPERATING:NET IMPACT ON TAX BASE 376 950 2ti6 776
EXTERNAL AGENCIES:;Bl PPETREQUESTS
Non-Cotrollabie
2010%Over 199"on-c
36 Library-(neg'ns)/Pr.#2=1ncr Services(Excludes Main Library Trf)99=1,171,637 1,236,706 5.47 64,068[M16,742 90,340
37 8owmanvilie Museum 1999 Request=$64,408 66,340 3.00::: 1:932 38 Clarke Museum 1999 Request=$63,801 72,234 13.22:39 Visual Arts Centre 1999 Request=$47,000
47,000 0.00:Sub total :: 74,433: 90,340
Note:Museums&Visual Arts R uests have been placed in Non-Controllable&Priori #1 based on Bowmanville Request,
TOTAL REQUESTS -MUNICIPAL&EXTERNAL BUDGETS J302,51711 302,517 1 90,340
Note:some of the numbs
CLARINGTON OLDER ADULT ASSOCIATION
G\ac\ngton Beech Centr Attachment#2
e
26 Beech Avenue . Bowmanville • ON L1 C 3A2
Telephone: (905) 697-2856 Fax: (905) 697-0739
April 7`h 2000 ;..
Municipality of Clarington
40 Temperance Street
Bowmanville, ON ;)F ,LARIiVG i OiV
L1C 3A6
ATT: Marie Marano
Treasurer
Re: Budget Requirements- Clarington Older Adult Association
Marie, enclosed is a copy of our Capitol Budget and a copy of our Operations
Budget for your records.
The Clarington Older Adult Association is requesting financial support for our
Capitol and Operational Budget.
Capitol Budget- Item (e) Folding Partition $20,000.00
With the increase in programs the need to provide more space is required almost
daily. This can be achieved by installing the second partition in the auditorium.
The provision for this folding partition along with the track installation was made
when the room was built. This folding partition will give us the capability of having
three activities taking place at the same time in this area.
Operations Budget- Item (b) Funding (Program Coordinator) $27,000.00
As you are aware, our membership and activities have increased over the past
twelve months to the point we require a staff person to administer the programs.
This work has been done to-date with the help of volunteers and Board members.
The workload is too great for volunteers and we require an individual who can be
working full time with our members, providing them with programs and activities
that meet their needs. This position will also generate revenue by attracting new
members and user fees collected from the activities.
With the present membership number and our projected growth the
consequences of not having a Program Coordinator will be disastrous. Losing
membership due to not having programs and activities is the last thing we want to
see. Marie is it possible to have the money for this financial support taken out of
the Clarington Older Adult Reserve fund?
Marie I would like to thank you for your support in our request for the elevator at
The Beech Centre and our members were very pleased to hear that the -
Municipality decided to have it installed as well.
If you need any more information regarding this budget request please feel free to
contact me.
Thank you,
i
John Coffey
Executive Director
Clarington Older Adult Association
2000 / 2001 Budget
Capitol
EXPENDITURE 2000/2001
NOTE:
a Elevator $ 150,000.00
b Games Room $ 10,000.00
Furniture ( chairs for Auditorium ) $ 5,000.00
d Furniture ( Games room ) $ 5,000.00
e Folding Partition $ 20,000.00
TOTAL $ 190,000.00
NOTE: Item a : Elevator was previously approved and will be funded by
The Municipality of Clarington
Item b: c: d: The Clarington Older Adult Assoc. will Fundraise to cover the
cost of these expenditures.
Item e: Folding Partion. Requesting financial support from the Municipality
of Clarington to cover this item.
1 2:11 PM x/08/2000
Clarington Older Adult Association
2000 / 2001 Budget
Operations
Income 2000 / 2001
NOTE
a Municipal Grant $ 6,000.00
b Funding (reserve fund) $ 27,000.00
c Donations $ 5,000.00
d Membership $ 9,500.00
e Membership Activities $ 12,000.00
f Rentals $ 34,000.00
g Leases $ 36,012.00
h Fundraising $ 17,000.00
i Hospiality $ 8,000.00
Surplus from Previous Year $ 18,000.00
Expenses $ 172,512.00
1 Salary- Director $ 32,000.00
2 Salary - Clerical $ 10,000.00
3 Salary - Support Staff $ 27,000.00
4 Activities Exp. $ 8,000.00
5 Advertising-Activities $ 1,000.00
6 Advertising - Facility $ _2,000.00
7 Utililities $ 23,000.00
8 Maintenance-supplies $ 11,00_0.00
9 Maintenance-Janitorial $ 22,000.00
10 Maintenance- Other $ 1,000.00
11 -Office General $ 7,000.00
12 Fundraising $ 8,000.00
13 Insurance $ 1,700.00
14 Professional Fees $ 11500.00
15 IYOP
16 AdvanceFunding $ 9,000.00
17 Membership $ 2,000.00
18 Hospitality $ 2,500.00
Total Expenses $ 168,700.00
25 Surplus $ 3,812.00
Note: Item (b) Revenue is regested from reserve fund to
cover the cost of hiring a program coordinator.
1 2:13 PM 04/08/2000
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REPORT
Meeting: General Purpose and Administration Committee File #
Date: Monday, May 1, 2000 Res. #
Report #: PD-042-00 File #: ZBA99-029; I ST-99018 By-law #
Subject: REZONING AND DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS
APPLICANT: LIZJAN DEVELOPMENTS INC.
PART LOT 9, CONCESSION 2, FORMER TOWN OF BOW-MANVILLE
FILE NO.: ZBA 99-029; 18T-99018 --
Recommendations:
It is respectfully recommended that the General Purpose and Administration Committee recommend
to Council the following:
I. THAT Report PD-042-00 be received;
2. THAT subject to the approval of a Parking Plan by the Director of Public Works:
a) the Ontario Municipal Board be requested to approve the proposed Draft Plan of
Subdivision 1 ST-99018 as amended and submitted by PMG Planning Consultants on
behalf of Lizjan Developments Inc. subject to the conditions of draft plan approval
contained in Attachment No. 4 of this Report;
b) the Ontario Municipal Board be requested to enact the zoning by-law for the subject
lands as provided for in Attachment No. 5 to this Report;
C) the Mayor and Cleric be authorized, by By-law, to execute a subdivision agreement
between the Owner and the Municipality of Clarington to the satisfaction of the
Director of Planning and Development and the Director of Public Works;
(1) a By-law to remove the "Holding (H)" symbol be forwarded to Council once the
applicant has entered into a subdivision agreement with the Municipality;
3. THAT in the event that:
a) the Parking Plan submitted does not meet Municipal requirements, staff be
authorized to make appropriate changes to the plan of subdivision lotting in order to
achieve compliance;
b) the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board agrees to modified conditions of
draft plan approval, staff be authorized to substitute the modified conditions for
conditions 35 and 36.
4. THAT the Solicitor and staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board in
support of Recommendation 2 and 3 FORTHWITH;
5. THAT a copy of the report and Council's decision be forwarded to the Region of Durham
Planning Department and the Ontario Municipal Board; and
6. THAT all interested parties listed in this report and any delegations be advised of Council's
decision.
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 2
L. APPLICATION DETAILS
1.1 Applicant: Lizjan Developments Inc.
1.2 Agent: PMG Planning Consultants
1.3 Rezoning: To rezone the subject lands from "Agricultural (A) Zone" to permit the
development of a plan of subdivision.
1.4 Draft Plan of Subdivision:
As Submitted As Revised - -
44 - 9 m link dwelling lots 46 - 9.5 m single detached lots
51 - 10.5 m single detached lots 39 - 10.5 m single-detached lots
41 - 12.2 m single detached-lots 51 - 12 m single detached lots
2.03 11a school block 2.51 ha school block
0.46 ha neighbourhood park block 0.1 ha open space block
0.27 ha future commercial block
1.5 Site Area: 10.6 hectares (26.2 acres)
2. LOCATION
2.1 The subject lands are located on the west side of Meams Avenue north of the St. Lawrence
and Hudson Railway in Bowmanville (see Attachment No.1). The applicant's land holdings
totals 10.6 hectares (26.2 ac). The property is located in Part Lot 9, Concession 2, in the
former Town of Bowmanville.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 On August 19, 1999, PMG Planning Consultants, on behalf of Lizjan Developments Inc.,
submitted rezoning and draft plan of subdivision applications to the Municipality of
Clarington.
3.2 A Public Meeting was held on November 1, 1999 to solicit input from the surrounding
residents. The following concerns were raised:
• The trees provide a noise buffer from railway noise to the south. A difference is noted in
the summer when the trees are foliated.
• Existing vegetation provides habitat for wildlife. Trees should be preserved.
• The function of the drainage swale should not be impacted.
The concerns are addressed in Section 8.6 of this report.
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 3
3.3 On ,January 6, 2000, staff met with the applicant to discuss planning and design issues
relating to the draft plan of subdivision. The applicant has referred that application to the
Ontario Municipal Board on ,January 19, 2000 because the Municipality of Clarington and
Regional Municipality of Durham failed to make a decision on the proposed zoning
amendment and draft plan of subdivision respectively within 90 days. Staff can only
presume that the applicant sought a firmer commitment to timing than staff could provide at
that time.
3.4 On-January 18, 2000, a request was received from the agent seeking the following zoning
by-law amendments:
• The reference to an underground linkage for 18.0 metre link lots should be removed to
permit 9.0 metre single detached lots.
• The applicant requests that 10.0 metre single detached lots be permitted.
• The applicant requests that exterior side yards be reduced from 0.0 metres to 3.0 metres
in the draft plan.
As the request was formally submitted prior to the referral to the OMB, this request is also
before the OMB.
3.5 Staff met with the applicant and agents several times in the last three weeks to resolve as
many issues as possible prior to OMB hearing date. The result is a revised draft plan of
subdivision that addresses the majority of subdivision design and engineering issues. The
revised draft plan now proposes 33 - 9.5 metre single detached lots, 40 - 10.5 metre single
detached lots, 64 - 12.0 metre single detached lots, a 2.51 hectare (6.2 acre) public
elementary school site and a 0.1 hectare open space block.
3.6 A hearing has been scheduled for Monday, May 8, 2000 for a five day period. The purpose
of this report is to get Council's direction for the hearing. If Council concurs with the
contents of this report, then a settlement can be presented with the consent of both parties for
the Board's approval.
3.7 The final lotting pattern for the plan of subdivision was settled at a meeting between staff
and the developer on Wednesday, April 26`x'. It has not been possible to prepare a Parking
Plan for this report and thus staff is seeking authorization on the basis that it will comply
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 4
with municipal standards. No problems are anticipated given the changes to lotting mix.
However, if it does not comply, then staff would require further changes to the plan of
subdivision.
3.8 The developer does not concur with the proposed conditions 28, 35 and 36 for the Kawartha
Pine Ridge School Board Site. A meeting between these parties is scheduled for the week of
-- - May 1, 2000. In the event that the School Board agrees to alternate conditions, staff have no
--objection to their substitution for conditions 35 and 36. However, staff require condition 28
to remain to ensure the orderly development of the lands as planned.
4. SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND SURROUNDING USES
4.1 The site is currently being used for agricultural purposes. The western and the northern
property boundaries contain hedgerows. The land slopes steadily towards Meams Avenue.
An intermittent tributary of the Soper Creek is located on the north-east portion of the
property.
4.2 Surrounding Uses:
East: Vacant lands containing draft approved subdivision plan 18T-95005 (Schickedanz)
and draft plan of condominium 18CDM-93005 (Melody Homes)
North: Urban residential uses and vacant lands
West: Vacant lands containing draft approved subdivision plan 18T-90036 (Chizen)
South: Vacant lands containing draft approved subdivision plan 18T-89064 (819363 Ontario
Ltd.) and St. Lawrence and Hudson Railway.
-5 OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
5.1 The lands are designated "Living Area" within the Durham Region Official Plan.
Residential uses are permitted within this designation. The application conforms to the
policies.
5.2 Within the Clarington Official Plan, the majority of the property is designated "Urban
Residential". A "Neighbourhood Park" designation and a "Public Elementary School"
symbol are also located in the vicinity of the subject lands.
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 5
The Official Plan permits net residential densities between 10 to 30 units per net residential
hectare in low density areas. The proposed 137 dwelling units in the revised plan would
yield a density of 26.2 units per net hectare, which fits within the density range. The overall
density has decreased slightly from 26.6 units per net hectare contained in the original
proposal.
The original draft plan proposed a 0.46 hectare park block that would- b� added to the =
existing Longworth Park. That plan also proposed a 2.03 hectare public_elementary school
beside the park. The policies encourage school sites to be- located- adjacent to
neighbourhood parks to permit joint-use between these facilities. The policies require that
elementary school sites must have a minimum size of 2.5 hectares.
5.3 The Natural Features and Land Characteristics Map CI indicates that the property is within
50 metres of a tableland woodlot. As a result, an Environmental Impact Study was initiated
to determine the impacts of development and to identify mitigating measures to minimize
impacts.
_6. ZONING BY-LAW CONFORMITY
6.1 The subject lands are currently zoned "Agricultural (A) Zone", which only permits
agricultural uses on the property. In order to permit residential uses on the property, a
rezoning application was submitted for consideration.
7. AGENCY COMMENTS
7.1 The Clarington Fire Department and Veridian Corporation have no objections to the
proposal.
7.2 The Clarington Public Works Department has provided comments on the proposal. The
following list identifies major issues.
• A traffic report is required to determine the issues of external road access, number of
accesses required to accommodate traffic volumes and the traffic impact on Mearns
Avenue and the Mearns Avenue and Concession Street intersection. This report is
required prior to issuance of draft approval.
• The applicant must construct the external portion of Rickaby Street between the subject
lands and Hooper Square.
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 6
• An on-street parking plan is required prior to issuance of draft approval.
• A 3.00 meu-e road widening is required to be dedicated on Mearns Avenue.
• The applicant must acquire the north half of Longworth Avenue and fully service the
abutting lands with water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and all necessary utilities. The
timing of construction for these required services must be agreed to prior to issuance of
draft approval.
• Full development of the draft plan will required all external accesses to be constructed.
The number available at any given time will determine the development phasing
strategy.
• The applicant will be required to contribute towards external works oversizing of storm
sewers and stormwater management facilities constructed by Eiram Development
Corporation.
• The applicant must provide a Preliminary Master Grading Plan to demonstrate that 9.0
metre wide lots situated on a road with a 5% grade can be graded in accordance with
municipal standards.
• The Conceptual Servicing Plan must indicate road grades for Longworth Avenue and
Streets "B" to the west. Contirmation that all proposed roads will align properly
between adjacent draft plans must also be provided.
• An appropriate parkland dedication is required.
7.3 The Durham Region Planning Department has no objection to the proposal provided that
potential noise sources from major roads (Longworth Avenue and Mearns Avenue) and the
railway line are mitigated through a noise report.
Municipal services are available to the site and will be subject to Regional requirements
through conditions of draft plan approval for the subdivision plan.
7.4 Comments initially provided by Central Lake Ontario Conservation indicated that five lots
at the north end of Rickaby Street were located within a valley and vegetated area defined
by a development plan to the east. Revisions to the plan were required to be consistent with
the "Environmental Protection (EP)" zoning established to the east.
Discussions between the applicant and CLOC resulted in the deletion of former Lots 22 and
23 and a portion of former Lot 21. Therefore, CLOC has no objections in principle to the
development provided that their conditions of draft plan approval are fulfilled.
7.5 The Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board has no objections provided that the
following conditions are fulfilled:
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 7
• A 2.5 hectare (6.0 acre) school site is required within this proposal.
• Sidewalks are required on all streets.
• An option agreement for the site must be signed with the Owner prior to Final Approval.
• The School Board requires permission to conduct bore hole tests to assess site suitability
prior to Final Approval.
7.6 The Peterborough Victoria Northumberland and Clarington Catholic District School Board
has no objections provided that adequate provision be made for sidewalks within the
subdivision.
7.7 Canada Post Corporation has no objections provided that community mailboxes are
provided to the corporation's standards.
7.8 The C. P. Railway (now St. Lawrence and Hudson Railway) indicates that the following
provisions be applied to this development:
• Dwellings must be constructed to meet interior noise requirements as provided by the
Ministry of Environment.
• The developer must warn all potential purchasers within 300 metres of the railway's
existence and future expansion potential, and that the railway is not responsible for
claims due to its operation.
7.9 Comments have never been received from the Durham Regional Police Force or Bell
Canada.
8. COMMENTS
8.1 The draft plan of subdivision originally submitted only provided the Public School Board
with a 2.0 hectare sized school site. Both the official plan and the School Board require an
elementary school site with a minimum size of 2.5 hectares.
The original plan also included a 0.46 hectare park block, which would represent the last
required piece of Longworth Park. This park block would be melded with future park lands
obtained through the draft approved Chizen subdivision to the west. Based on a request
from the applicant, staff examined the impact of deleting park block from the Longworth
Park concept plan. A review determined that this park block could be used for school site
purposes for the following reasons:
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 8
• A revised concept plan for Longworth Park showed that the block was not a crucial
component of the overall park development.
• The western edge of the park block contains a natural hedgerow, which must be removed
if this park block were to be incorporated into the overall park. Maintaining the
hedgerow would preserve this natural feature.
• The park block has a noticeable slope to the east and would therefore not form an
effective component of the overall park without significant regrading.
_ The addition of the 0.46 hectare park block to the 2.03 hectare school site would provide the
School Board with an appropriately sized fixture school site. Staff will encourage the Board
to construct their school parking lot near the park so it can be shared with park patrons as
well. Although the Board has no objections to this proposal, correspondence confirming
their acceptance of this proposal has not been received.
If the Board accepts this proposal, the developer will retain lots on the west side of Rickaby
Street. Therefore, the developer must provide a 5 1/'o cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication.
8.2 The lotting mix has been a concern to staff. The applicant proposed a housing mix
comprising mostly Iuik dwelling units and small lot singles. The Official Plan requires that
a range of housing be provided. This site has no medium density designation. In
discussions with the applicant, the number of 12.0 m singles has been increased substantially
and the number of 10.5 m singles have been reduced. The 9.0 m links have been enlarged to
9.5 m singles which provides for larger dwelling units. The changes are summarized below:
Original Plan Recommended Plan
No. Percentage No. Percentage
9,0 m (29.5 ft.) Links 44 32% 0 0 %
9.5 m (31 ft.) Singles 0 0% 33 24 %
10.5 m (34.5 ft.) Singles 51 38% 40 29 %
12.0 m (39 ft.) Singles 41 30% 64 47 %
136 100% 137 100%
The increase in the number of units is the result of the deletion of the future commercial
block; net densities have been slightly reduced. It is noted that the plan of subdivision does
not incorporate any 13.5 m or 15.0 m lots; however, a total of 6 - 13.2 m lots are located
along Longworth Avenue.
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 9
8.3 Subdivision design has evolved through comments provided by agencies.
• The applicant had initially shown Street "F" as a single loaded road adjacent to Meares
Avenue. This type of design is encouraged because the dwelling shields the outdoor
area rear yard from noise sources. The lotting pattern has now been changed to match
the reverse lotting pattern established by the draft plan to the south. Staff will require
special landscaping features planted in front of the noise fence, alternatively, the
developer could erect architectural noise fencing at back of these lots along Mearns
Avenue.
• Staff along with the applicant have worked to minimize the number of lots fronting on
Longworth Avenue, minimizing number of entrances onto a collector road -
• As previously mentioned, several lots have been designated as an open space block and
the future commercial block has been deleted. -
8.4 As previously mentioned, the applicant submitted a revised rezoning request for the
following items:
• The reference to an underground linkage for 18.0 metre link lots should be removed to
permit a true 9.0 metre single detached lot. This amendment is being sought,primarily
for marketing purposes. The applicant subsequently revised the proposal to 9.5 metre
single detached lots.
The applicant requested 10.0 metre single detached lots be permitted but subsequently
revised to 10.5 metre single detached lots.
• The applicant requests that exterior side yards be reduced from 6.0 metres to 3.0 metres
in the draft plan.
9.5 Metre Single Detached Lots
Staff do not support the 9.5 metre single as a standard lot size. However, given that the
current zoning by-law provides for 9.0 metre link dwellings, this is an improvement which
assists with the creation of a more attractive streetscape, particularly with the two outdoor
parking spaces required.
10.5 Metre Single Detached Lots
Staff support this lot size as an exception since the additional lot frontage provides
additional design flexibility in comparison to a link lot. A wider lot permits a better
transition for lot grading. A 10.5 metre lot frontage will lessen the impact of two car
driveways and provides a greater opportunity for on-street parking
Exterior Side Yard Reduction
Staff support the reduction of the exterior side yard from 6.0 metres to 3.0 metres for the
following reasons:
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 10
• The reduced setback provides greater design and house siting flexibility.
• Siting houses closer towards the road provides a sense of community and a presence at
the street line.
• An exception zone permitting this type of reduction has been approved elsewhere in the
Municipality.
Although the Public Works Department has approved this reduction in the past, there are
instances where larger exterior side yards are required to assist in grading, especially where
grades are steep. While a reduction can be supported in the flatter portions of the
subdivision, this reduction should not be permitted in areas where the Public Works
Department require a larger exterior side yard for grading purposes. A condition of draft
approval will permit a 3.0 metre exterior side yard, except where the Director of Public
Works deems it inappropriate.
8.5 An Environmental Impact Study was required because the proposal is adjacent to a tributary
of the Soper Creek. The study examined the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the
Soper Creek tributary, potential downstream fisheries impacts in the Soper Creek,
preservation of trees and wildlife habitat and movement within the forested portions of the
site. The following recommendations will apply to the subdivision development and be
incorporated into the conditions ofdraft approval.
• Trees within the hedgerow along the northern border of the site should be preserved,
where feasible, to provide a buffer between the proposed school site and the existing
homes to the north.
• Since the valley vegetation offers potential wildlife habitat, it is recommended that
grading works associated with Lot 27 and the Rickaby Street road crossing seek to
minimize disturbance to the valley vegetation at this location. Therefore, grading plans
should be finalized in consultation with a qualified ecologist in order to protect valuable
trees with roots extending onto the development lands.
• Best Management Practices (BMP's) for storm water which promote infiltration should
be used to preserve the existing hydrologic cycle. This would include directing and
discharging roof water onto previous lawn areas.
• An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan should be prepared as part of the future
detailed engineering plans with particular emphasis on the protection of the Soper Creek
tributary and valley feature. These sediment and erosion control measurer should be
inspected frequently during constriction.
• Construction of Rickaby Street will necessitate some disturbance within the open space
Block D at the northeast corner of the site. The final report will contain measures
dealing with edge restoration, vegetation improvement and tree preservation along
Rickaby Street and Block D.
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 11
8.6 A number of adjacent residents raised concerns regarding tree preservation on the subject
lands. They requested that all trees be preserved to foster wildlife habitat and buffer the
residents from rail noise on the St. Lawrence and Hudson Railway, especially a particularly
old maple behind 5 Hooper Square. A closer examination revealed that this tree in question
is located on adjacent lands to the east, where they would be protected through existing
_ "Environmental Protection (EP)" zoning. A tree preservation plan will also assist in the
preservation of trees. The agent indicated that hedgerows on the school block would be
preserved.
Discussions between the applicant and CLOG resulted in the preservation oil'a treed area on
the east side of Rickaby Street on lands now identified as open space Block D.
8.7 The original proposed draft plan shows a 0.28 hectare Future Use block, which is currently
_designated for residential uses. Although the applicant intends to develop for commercial
uses in the future, the required official plan amendment, rezoning and site plan applications
have not been submitted for consideration. Staff do not support this proposed use and
required the applicant to lot the block appropriately for residential uses to tie in with
- adjacent lots on Street "F and Longworth Avenue.
8.8 The Public Works Department has indicated that the preliminary grading plan shows grades
of 5%, on the western portions of Longworth Avenue and Street "B". Based on
topographical constraints and overland flow requirements, the Public Works Department
will accept a 4.5 0/, road grade in the western half and a 1%, road grade on the eastern half of
the development. A steeper road grade can be accommodated because the lots along
Longworth Avenue and Street "B" have been widened. Lots on either side of Street "D",
which previously flanked onto that street, now front onto Street "D". This assists with lot
grading and limits the number of accesses onto Longworth Avenue, which functions as a
collector road.
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 12
8.9 A parking plan must be prepared by the applicant to demonstrate that sufficient on-street
parking exists. This plan is under preparation at the time of the writing of this report as
noted in Section 3.7. Accordingly staffs support of the proposal is conditional upon
meeting municipal requirements and further changes to the plan may be required.
Accordingly, staff are seeking authorization to make the changes as required prior to the
Board hearing.
8.10 . Totten Sims Hubicki Associates prepared the traffic report required by Public Works
detailing impacts of the development on Mearns Avenue and the Mearns
Avenue/Concession Street intersection. A study determined that traffic generated from this
development would not compromise the function of Mearns Avenue and necessitate further
improvements to the Mearns Avenue/Concession Street intersection. The external access
points, which include Longworth Avenue and Rickaby Street, will pen-nit the development
to proceed in its entirety, subject to phasing requirements discussed elsewhere.
8.11 Lizjan Developments must negotiate with Eiram Development Corporation to acquire or
have conveyed the other half of the Longworth Avenue road allowance to create a full
entrance to the subdivision. The northern extent of the road must be fully serviced with
municipal water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and necessary utilities. Previous discussions
with the applicant indicated that this would not be a problem. Development cannot
commence until the applicant provides at least two means of access to the subdivision.
8.12 Lots at the ends of' Streets "C", "E" and "F" will be frozen to accommodate temporary
turning circles until adjacent subdivision plans to the south and west are constructed. Once
constricted, the temporary facilities will be removed and building permits issued. Similarly,
lots requiring road frontage that will be constricted through other draft plans of subdivision
will also be frozen. Once these roads are constricted, building permits will be issued.
8.13 The applicant has requested that a subdivision layout be approved on the school site, which
would be developed if the Public School Board decided not to exercise its option on the
property. Staff do not support this request for the following reasons:
• Deletion ofa school symbol requires an amendment to the Official Plan.
REPORT PD-042-00 PAGE 13
• The housing targets contained in the Official Plan have not taken this practice into
consideration.
• The public residing in the area does so with the expectation that the school will be
constructed.
• Preliminary lot grading and drainage information is based on the use of the property
as a school, not residential purposes. The stormwater management system was not
designed to accommodate these additional flows.
9. CONCLUSIONS - --
9.1 Based on the comments provided in this report, it is respectfully recommended that the
Solicitor and staff be authorized to appear at the upcoming Ontario Nl:unicipal Board
hearing in support of the application for draft plan of subdivision, as revised, subject to
the conditions of draft approval contained in Attachment No. 4. It is further
recommended that the Board be requested to approve the zoning of the subject lands in
accordance with Attachment No. 5.
Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by, -
1
i
Dav'*Plannnin R.P.P. rank in�Wu, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.,
Direcevelopment Chief Administrative Officer
RH*LDT*DJC*cc
April 27, 2000
Attachment No. 1 - Key Map
Attachment No. 2 - Draft Plan of Subdivision, as submitted
Attachment No. 3 - Draft Plan of Subdivision, as revised
Attachment No. 4 - Conditions of Draft Plan Approval
Attachment No. 5 - Zoning By-law
Interested parties to be notified of Council and Committee's decision:
Mr. Philip Litowitz
Lizjan Developments Inc. Mr. John Rackstraw
3845 Bathurst Street
Suite 103
Downsview, Ontario M5H 3N2
Mr. Julius DeRuyter
PMG Planning Consultants
227 Bridgeland Avenue
Toronto, Ontario M6A 1 Y7
ATTACHMENT #1
SUBJECT SITE
LOT 10 LOT 9 LOT 8
CONCESSION ROAD 3
CL
LLJ
LONGWORTH —} cy N
PARK
3 v~i M W I CRT. z z
cy— Q O
0 cn
z cn
V) w
LONGWORTH z V
LLJ PARK cy— Z
cr- EXPANSION 0
V) - M _ U
i
P
1
-- - - - --I P��
BOWMANVILLE Z B A 99-029
KEY MAP 18T-9901 8
3 _ r
i.d
SUBJECT"
-----------
LANDS
' ., .. .• -> _, .• •' y F •� - KEY MAP SCALE , NTS
SCHEDULE OF LAND USE
r ■ S > De—',,c G 5
Z Sfng a ,»_netl G lots
_ r S,;, Get--- 2 loa
_> >.RK `�" _ .. - Z I. 135 J:6, nc
; .e5.,•en, .a
i o+ z oa' c Portion of Road Allowance 'e P ss- < 0 2D4
4 Future Lse <, J 283 rc
I r ' 2_ n : [ °to be Acquired from Eiram F t wtle„ss 42 cce:
r,ture Rootls 143-:44 J JJ �o
c�„ e Development Corporation. z Rnds _ 2 4=-
• p Q TOTAL C6G3 nc
r o r
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
x STREET A:•' --- --
■ ,a P ,� ! a >'� `>' "� • " ' R ( r^ LILJAN FSCJ E•J[LOPM[NTS M1'i NC Pw1 SAINAn COMPAW��I,IJ'+,
- k' ■y ' ■ s J �' c'JNkE j o...,o wo n...r.o.s
?S vim• r r G�•Q [ G r L� P' r ■ >, > _ 02E7 na , I' 16.ti+C tl
_ _t ■ ':4+R s y+ • ¢ Z S ¢ ¢ Il i�}.OSm>ROGD
:x:. > S C_S = S I■ ■ ■ ■IS S it C w1DE—R
` —1 .r �• I �i. '{ O.OSt �( o scaa cL�SJ
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
R STREET B . z r o• :v
2 ■ u xi L. r
" .".-a. -�W" ° • a2l= x•'■I■. f■ xlxl •z .c :
r ■ ¢I21¢ a III(, .,...,.v.......�...<....a......
.( ■ ere .■ —A !- R_ a Z
N •_.�. .!•I• 'I a _ • v — �a ; E� n[ _ WII a DRAFT PLAN
Ll _r^- ;!:al",xl,a;.a.A %_ ,0ESn=�;. -=I_ �r,o:r,� Yf-n�=f of Subdivision j" w
_. - s» �r;>w .-�-° Fu�JR• F OF PART OF LOT 9.
_
'ARE Ro.C' � --�tl"� « � CONCESSION 2•
- -- --- MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM
P L A N 1 9 T 8 9 0 6 4 11000
.. •„"°""a'r^vt �2170
l.R.
PP:I'">", .. sR �..« �cnca `zi o-oas
'I t
I�
'I
---- -- -- -- --tom-- — ---- —- -
I
j R�_STEn_. •. - - ' t SUercT Lli
KEY MAP SCALE — NTS
._- --. ,`-: _ � _�- - .�-• - SCHEDULE OF LAND USE
} F.'-!-_t�^,- ,_�-�-»- .h..,•_�"t-.:.�.��`'�° L .�1�•�N�{�1A��r_ _. wrso•.,m wo�s „�.7-- ----- --
R.Wd-tlol "¢r. _ :�.f ■ S.ngie op Ddtc_nn; S
?, 4 .. ¢ s�ng�� t:.-n-_
`� •Q e t 'y.�'�,C_,'C' C Snil�e Det-nd7 0 1L Jm _--"64 I;ts_. to? R
NTAt_ _ 13' i_ts `JO T
P.W.E7vr+�tary z E= i C.7 1. wv e .ars,uos uu
'I', s.+ar(ru a.l - I Res7ent c: -t" iGO na
Y- - '= •-1 F,jlVrtl R85Jdnt� A.tJ �7.1 n�
• = ,., _ In .°I Z R�cI�C Eltlrtian t.lry C_„,-i 2 5,16 h0
Fv..etc GF en Spc_ D 0 1GJ ha
° i t •A j 3.05 Rocd 'y'd—ng E .,GS nc
n �,�•. - ra�r•u,:r.-a_n e.y < 03m Resmd St"p F 0 1C r,a
w E C r' -” Futurd Rc OJ 0 OOl h
v O „-.I. .! rutC:� j. } C � x zs.n.y�..op..rommcw.a oo uto s s•... w g za :
Z Roos _- 523 ho
w _
O
TO7AL 10.606 h.
` 0) _ Torw ,»got. xc z Lil
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE .•.'EYOR'S CERTIFICATE
r,,
tout
earo
^ t r t 1 Lci•Ywu'ih A. - _.. c suaccr u.mz,4ymr wr..s,z ar me e.acr:.... a
cO _ , T I _ _ - _ .w n..«�.c caair.tl,s.oa..rns roo c*K r.o _
d ' 'ur mv.+c,rrtiwr n.rL.'.
UZJAN DEVELOPMENTS INC. OMPANr LTD.
T e m U YAZI, P.llto.KZ
_ _ c. ..Ey; m 1 ..lars 1 F—a 1—k4 aL.i'c m c�.
l nano
tcmo 5� ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
R.wr.d t>ne.r s.cnm 51(27)Or m.Ra kN Rsa torn.a.F.13
r_ ,. it 1 ~ .a b zI •i .f f. C r�: _ ..S.0�.•v.• �^'” .•»+. ....,mu
-� - `fm on
` c p � W m'. � m E CI E ^; f E E E � ; f: • , + �- I..m rva.''m v.
-Fuuoy f fw n, DRAFT PLAN
m a `
�° 'rµ . *: ri ■ , ■ ,,uat _�� �., ?__ m r== r of Subdivision
j ��\\V
: =------ OF PART OF LOT 9, AIL/
•..». �y F - I 'AI CONCESSION 2.
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON �,
�� I I[ =�+M(o�t•�I _ Vii, I I I __ REGIONAL MUNICiPAL11Y OF DURHAM r
f, _ �______ �(..�-_____ R--J J April 2,1,10
y .. J t 1 r f ---+r C ,w
N 1 8 T,- $-9 �� 4 :. ti ! _ png
c -'10O' 2170
HSIL`aurm CADp uco nlB-DH,ill
as ' ± r. a.f w{8 Auc,I m ��2170-7
D
m
z
W
ATTACHMENT #4
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
PLAN IDENTIFICATION
1. That this approval applies to draft Plan of Subdivision 18T-99018 prepared by PMG
Planning Consultants, dated August 16, 1999, and revised on April 27, 2000 showing
Lots 57 to 59, 63 to 68, 72, 93 to 98, 101, 102, 106 to 109, 114 to 117 and 129 to 137
inclusive, for single detached dwellings with 9.5 metre lot frontages, Lots-27,29 to 31, 51
to 56, 60 to 62, 69 to 71, 73, 74, 79 to 81, 84 to 92, 99, 100, 110 to 113 an'd 121 to 124
inclusive for single detached dwellings with 10.5 metre lot frontages, Lots 1 to 26, 28, 32
to 50, 75 to 78, 82, S3, 103 to 105, 118 to 120 and 125 to 128 inclusive for single
detached dwellings with 12.0 metre lot frontages, Block C for a public elementary school,
Block D for open space, and various blocks for future residential purposes, reserve, road
widening, site triangle etc.
FINAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS
2. That all streets within the Plan of Subdivision shall be dedicated as public highway and
shown as such on the final plan.
3. That all streets shall be named to the satisfaction of the Municipality of Clarington and
shown on the final plan.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
4. That the Owner shall retain a qualified landscape architect to prepare and submit a
Landscaping Plan to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning and
Development for review and approval. The Landscaping Plan shall reflect the design
criteria of the Municipality as amended from time to time.
....2
it
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE SikTISFIED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
5. That the Owner shall retain a ql .lified Engineer to prepare and submit a Hydrogeologist Report
to the Director of Planning and Development to demonstrate that the proposed development
will not adversely impact the existing wells in the surrounding areas.
6. That the Owner shall retain a professional engineer to prepare and submit a-Waster Drainage
-and Lot Grading Plan to the Director of Public Works for review and approval. All plans and
drawings must conform to the Municipality's Design Criteria as amended from time to time.
7. That the Owner shall retain a qualified consultant to prepare and submit a Tree Preservation
plan to the Director of Planning and Development and the Director of Public Works for review
and approval.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
8. That the Owner shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the Municipality and agree to
abide by all terms and conditions of the Municipality's standard subdivision agreement,
including, but not limited to, the requirements that follow.
9. That all easements, road widenings, reserves and open space Block D as required by the
Municipality shall be granted to the Municipality free and clear of all encumbrances.
10. That the Owner shall pay to the Municipality at the time of execution of the subdivision
agreement, five percent (5°10) cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication for residential development.
11. That the builde, include a disclosure in all purchase and sale agreements advising home buyers
of municipal parking regulations.
3
-1-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
12. That the owner acknowledges and agrees to provide two (2) outdoor parking spaces for each
single detached dwelling twit to be constnucted within draft plan of subdivision 18T-99018.
Where the two outdoor parking spaces are provided side by side, the combined minimum width
of the two spaces may be reduced to 4.6 metres provided the minimum landscaped open space
within the front yard is thirty (30%) percent.
13. That any garage shall have a minimum width of 3.0 metres and a minimum area of 18.58 mz.
14. That the Owner shall pay to the Municipality, the development charge in accordance to the
Development Charge By-law as amended from time to time. as well as payment of a portion of
front end-charges pursuant to the Development Charge Act if any are required to be paid by the
owner.
15. -That the Owner shall erect a 1.2 metre high chain link fence along the northern and southern
boundaries of open space Block D to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
16. That the Owner construct, or cause the construction of, the unbuilt portion of Rickaby Street
within Plan of Subdivision 40M-1776 to link with Street "D" on this draft plan of subdivision.
The Owner will be responsible for 100% of the cost of constructing this access, including
sidewalks and all other related services. On acceptance of this portion of Rickaby Street, and
sidewalk and related services by the Municipality, the Municipality will reimburse the Owner
for the costs of construction as approved by the Director of Public Works if securities now
deposited with the Municipality by the Owner of the lands within Plan 40M-1776 can be used
for this purpose.
17. That the Owner ensure that sufficient lands arc conveyed to the Municipality for a nominal
consideration from the landowner identified by Assessment Roll number 18-17-020-060-110 to
facilitate the construction of Street "A" in its required width to Mearns Avenue. All municipal
services shall be installed along the north side of Street 'A' to service the lands identified by
Assessment Roll number 18-17-020-060-110 to the satisfaction of the Director of Public
Works. 4
---
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
Is. That all construction accesses will be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works.
I�). That the Owner ackiiowicd`es that this draft plan falls within the benefiting area of oversizing
works installed by Eiram Development Corporation. The applicant will be required to
contribute an appropriate share for the cost of oversized storm sewers anal. stormwater
-management facilities, based on a Front Ending Agreement registered against the Owner's
property that details oversized works, benefiting areas, proportionate contribution share, and
cost indexing provisions.
2C). That the Owner agrees to llnplenlent all recommendations of the Environmental Impact Study
as prepared for the development. The following recommendations shall be incorporated into
the Subdivision Agreement to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Development and
the Director of Public \Yorks:
a) The Owner shall preserve all trees within the hedgerow along the northern border of the
site, where feasible, to provide a buffer between the proposed school site and the
existing homes to the north. This shall be prepared in Conjunction with the tree
preservation plan identified in draft condition number 7.
b) The Owner shall retain a qualified ecologist to consult on grading works associated with
Lot 27 and the Street D/Rickaby Street road crossing to minimize disturbance to the
valley vegetation at this location and to minimize tree root destruction on Lot 27.
c) The Owner shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMP's) by directing and
discharging roof water onto pervious lawn areas to promote infiltration to best preserve
the existing hydrologic cycle.
(1) The Owner shall prepare an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan for the protection
of the Soper Creel: tributary and valley feature to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works. These sediment and erosion control measures shall be subject to
frequent inspection.
e) The Owner agrees to implement the final recommendations with respect to tree
preservation, edge restoration, and vegetation improvements within Block D.
1. That where the Director of Public Works is of the opinion that there is a lot grading and
- - drainagGproble►a�-on-a-cornci loL tl�e O vi3ei agrees that retaining wall Thal be-itti-lined-and
the following measures will be implemented:
a) architectural treatments to a building on a corner lot to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning and Development and the Director of Public Works; and/or, 5
-5-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
b) increase the exterior side yard setback to a building on a corner lot from 3.0 metres to
an appropriate exterior side yard setback of up to 6.0 metre maximum, as determined by
the Director of Public Works.
- 22. That the Owner agrees to pair dwellings with a 0.6 metre setback and.pair dw--elfings with a-1.2 —
metre setback for lots within "R2-26" and "R2-27" zones to accommodate-lot grading and
drainage requirements to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Where an odd
number of lots zoned "R2-26" and "R2-27" are permitted in succession along a street, the
Owner shall agree to implement the following measures:
a) special lot grading, drainage and/or architectural treatments on the side of the lot
containing the 0.6 metre setback to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and
Development and the Director of Public Works; and/or, - -
b) increase the interior sideyard setback to a building from 0.6 metres to an appropriate
interior side yard setback of up to 1.2 metre maximum, as determined by the Director of
Public Works.
23. That the Owner agrees that the Holding (H) symbol in the zoning for Lots 129 to 137 and
Blocks A and G will not be removed until such time as the adjacent plan of subdivision 18T-
89064 to the south has been registered. Lots 129 to 137 and Blocks A and G will front on an
external road and drainage from these lots will be tributary to the storm sewers located in the
adjacent subdivision. As a condition of removal of Holding (H) symb_ of from Lots 129 to 137
and Blocks A and G, the Owner must demonstrate that all roads and services are in place and
that all costs related to these works have been paid to the satisfaction of the Director of Public
Works.
24. That the Owner agrees that the termini of Streets "A", "B", "C", "D", "E" and "F" must be
stubbed for municipal water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer to provide for the servicing
requirements of adjacent developments.
-6-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
25. That the Owner agrees to provide casements for temporary turning circles as required at the
termini of Streets "C", "E" and "F". Lots 61 to 64, inclusive, Lots 110 to 113 and Lots 98 to
101, inclusive, sliall not be developed until such time that Streets "C", "E" and "F" are extended
and constructed to a finished urban roadway including frill municipal services, asphalt paving,
curb and gutter, sodded boulevard and street lighting for the entire frontage abutting the frozen
lots. The easement areas will be transferred to the owners of abutting lots when Streets "C",
"E" and "F" are extended and constructed to connect with lands in the adjacent plans of
subdivision.
26. That the Owner agrees that, prior to the issuance of building permits on the lots mentioned in
condition number 25, the applicant must provide for the removal of the temporary turning
circles on Streets "C", "E" and "F". The applicant must reconstruct the road to an urban
standard, including asphalt paving, curb and gutter, boulevard sodding, sidewalks, street
lighting and street trees.
27. That the Owner will ensure that Streets "A", "B", "C", "D", "E" and "F" align with the
appropriate streets on draft approved plans of subdivision 18T-89064, 18T-90036, 18T -95005
and Registered Plan 40M-1776.
28. That the Owner shall arrange with the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board and the
Owner of the lands within 40M-1776 for the conveyance to the School Board of Block 141
before final approval of this plan of subdivision.
29. That the Owner agrees to establish a geodetic benchmark in the vicinity of the intersection of
Mearns Avenue and Longworth Avenue, which will serve as a vertical control for the Fenwick
Neighbourhood. The Owner will be responsible for 100% of the cost of establishing this
benchmark.
-7-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
30. That the Owner shall provide and install sidewalks, street lights, temporary turning circles etc.
as per the Municipality's standards and criteria.
31. That the Owner shall cause all utilities, including, hydro, telephone, Cable TV, etc. to be buried
underground.
32. That the Owner shall provide the Municipality, at the time of execution of the subdivision
agreement unconditional and irrevocable Letters of Credit acceptable to the Municipality's
Treasurer, with respect to Performance Guarantee, Maintenance Guarantee, Occupancy Deposit
and other guarantees or deposit as may be required by the Municipality.
33. That the Owner shall adhere to architectural control requirements of the Municipality.
34. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Owner shall, through its engineer, to provide
a certification to the Director of Planning, certifying that the Builder's plans are in accordance
with the Noise Control Report as approved by the Region of Durham and the Municipality of
Clarington.
35. That the Owner shall enter into an option to purchase with the Kawartha Pine Ridge District
School Board for Block C prior to Final Approval. The terms of the option to purchase shall be
satisfactory to the School Board.
36. That the Owner shall agree to permit the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board to
conduct bore hole tests on Block C to assess soil suitability for school development purposes
prior to Final Approval.
37. That the Owner agrees to construct Longworth Avenue to an appropriate width to incorporate a
bicycle lane, ifrequircd by and, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
......8
-S-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAN REGISTRATION
REQUIREIIENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT (CONT'D)
8. That prior to the issuance of building permits, access routes to the subdivision must be provided
to meet Subsection 3?.5?(6) of the Ontario Building Code and, that all watermains and
hvdrants are fully serviced and the Owner a(,rees that during construction, fire access routes be
maintained according to Subsection 2.5.1.2 of the Ontario Fire Code, storage of combustible
waste he maintained as per Subsection 2.4.1.1 and open burning as per Subsection 2.6.3.4 of
the Ontario Fire Code.
39. That-the Owner agrees that where the well or private water supply of any person is interfered
with as_a result_of construction or the development of the subdivision, the Owner shall at his
expense, either connect the affected party to municipal water supply system or provide a new
wcdl or private water system so that water supplied to the affected party shall be of quality and
gUantity at least equal to the quality and quantity of water enjoyed by the affected party prior to
(lie interference.
40. That the Owner agrees to provide the Municipality with a copy of the draft approved and final
approved plan of subdivision on disk in a CAD format in accordance Axith the Municipality's
criteria. -
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON
BY-LAW NUMBER 2000-
being a By-law to amend By-law 84-63, the Comprehensive Zoning
By-law for the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle.
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality of Clarington deems it advisable to
amend By-law 84-63, as amended, of the Corporation of the former Town of Newcastle in
accordance with application ZBA 99-029 and 1 ST-99018 to permit the development of a residential
plan of subdivision.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Municipality
of Clarington enacts as follows:
I. Section 13.4 "SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS - URBAN RESIDENTIAL TYPE TWO (R2)
ZONE" is hereby farther amended by adding thereto, the following new Subsection
13.4.26, as follows:
"13.4.26 URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION(R2-26)ZONE
Notwithstanding Section 13.2,those lands zoned(R2-26)on the schedules to this By-law
shall also be subject to the following zone regulations:
a) Lot Area(minimum) 280 square metres
b) Lot Frontage(minimum)
i) interior lot 9.5 metres
i) exterior lot 11.5 metres
C) Yard Requirements(minimum)
i) front yard 6.0 metres to private garage or carport
_ 4.5 metres to dwelling
ii) interior side yard 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the
other side with attached private garage or
carport
3.0 metres on one side and 1.2 metres on the
other side without an attached private garage
or carport
iii) exterior side yard 3.0 metres"
Section 13.4 "SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS - URBAN RESIDENTIAL TYPE TWO (R2)
ZONE" is hereby further amended by adding thereto, the following new Subsection
13.4.27,as follows:
"13.4.27 URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION(R2-27)ZONE
Notwithstanding Section 13.2, those lands zoned (R2-27)on the schedules to this By-law
shall also be subject to the following zone regulations:
a) Lot Area(minimum) 310 square metres
antage( 'nimum
i) interior lot 10.5 metres
ii) exterior lot 12.5 metres
Yard Rcouircments tminnnum)
ont yard 0.0 metres to private garage or carport
4.5 metres to dwellimy.
I interior side yard 1.2 metres on one side and 0.6 metres on the
other side with attached private garage or
carport
3.0 metres on one side and 1.2 metres on the
other side\%ithout an attached private garage
or carport
iii) c\tcrtor side yard 3.0 metres"
ticction 13.-4 "SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS - t-'RBAN RESIDENTIAL TYPE T\\'O (R2)
ZONE" is herchv Further amended by adding thereto, the following new SubstTtlon
13.4.28, as Follo�ts:
13.4.28 URBAN RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTION(R2-28)ZONE –
Notwithstanding Section 13.2,those lands zoned(R2-28)on the schedules to this By-Law
shall also be subject to the following zone regulations: -
a) Lot Frontage(minimum
i) �\tcrior lot 14.0 metres
h) Yard Requirements(minimum)
i l t rant Ward 6.0 metres to private garage or carport
4.5 metres to dwelling
c\terror side yard 3.0 metres"
2. Schedule"3" h) B\-lay\ 84-63 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone
designation fi-om:
"A�riculttual t:\)Lone"to"Holding- Urban Residential Exception((H)R1-42)Zone"
":\griculturaI(A)Zone"to"I folding- Urban Residential Type Two((H)R2)Zone"
_ "Agricultural(A)Zone"to"Holding- Urban Residential Exception((H)R2-26)Zone"
"Agricultural(A)Zone"to"Holding- Urban Residential Exception((H)R2-27)?_one"
"Agricultural(A)Zone"to"Holding- Urban Residential Exception((H)R2-28)Zone"
"Agricultural(A)Zone"to"Environmental Protection(EP)Zone"
3. Schedule"A" attached hereto shall fonrrpart of this By-law.
4. I'his 13-law shall come into eflect on the date of' the passing hereof, subject to the
provisions ol'Scctions 34 and 36 of the Planning Act.
BY-LAW read a lirst time this day of 2000.
BY-LAW read a second time this day of 2000.
BY-LAW read a thnrd time and finally passed this day of 2000.
CLERK
This is Schedule "A" to By-law 2000-
passed this day of - 2000 A.D.
. _ O V///
N
l l
m Street A I... hA. —
- Z
a I !
0 05
Street 8
Om
NO
,
® ZONING CHANGE FROM "A" TO"(H)R1 -42"
ZONING CHANGE FROM "A" TO"(H)R2"
ZONING CHANGE FROM "A" TO"(H)R2-26"
ZONING CHANGE FROM "A" TO"(H)R2-27"
ZONING CHANGE FROM "A" TO"(H)R2-28"
® ZONING CHANGE FROM "A" TO"EP"
Ma or
Clerk
LOT 10 LOT 9 LOT 8
CONCESSION ROAD 3
DINT.
N
wt^t#fl l..._..... _ w
�. O
N
()
1 I V) W
Q
�: C�VµSpry Q O
U
F.
I
BOWMANVILLE r `�
li- .